﻿FN Clarivate Analytics Web of Science
VR 1.0
PT J
AU Dong, W
   Zhao, L
   Cheng, W
   Guo, CY
   Shen, XY
   Yao, HX
AF Dong, Wei
   Zhao, Liang
   Cheng, Wei
   Guo, Chunyan
   Shen, Xinyong
   Yao, Haoxin
TI Inconsistent trends between early and late winters in extreme cold
   events in China from 1980 to 2021
SO FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE early and late winters; extreme cold events; high-latitude blocking;
   Arctic Oscillation; anticyclonic anomaly over the North Pacific
ID FGOALS-F3-L MODEL DATASETS; URAL BLOCKING; ARCTIC AMPLIFICATION;
   SEA-ICE; TEMPERATURE; CLIMATE; VARIABILITY; MONSOON; IMPACT; REVERSAL
AB Understanding intra-seasonal variation in extreme cold events (ECEs) has important implications for climate prediction and climate adaptation. However, the ECEs difference between early (from December 1 to January 15) and late (from January 16 to February 28) winters is a lack of sufficient understanding. Herein, we investigated the trends of ECEs over eastern China in early and late winters. Results showed that the number of days with ECEs had a faster and uniformly decreasing trend in late winter over eastern China, whereas the decreasing trend in early winter was not significant because of the dipole pattern with an increase of ECEs in northeast China and a decrease of ECEs in southeast China during the time period 1980-2021. This denoted that China was presenting a pattern of "cold early winter-warm late winter ". The feature of cold early winter was related to a significant increase in high-latitude blocking highs extending poleward and reaching the Arctic Circle in early winter during the last 20 years. In particular, there was a large-scale tilted high ridge from the Ural Mountains to northern Asia, which favored the negative phase of the Arctic oscillation. This, in turn, led to a strong Siberian high and East Asian winter monsoon. Strong cold advection related to the circulation anomalies caused an ECEs increase in northeast China and dominated the change in temperature over eastern China in early winter. By contrast, the decrease in ECEs in late winter in the last 20 years was more related to the interdecadal enhancement of the anticyclonic anomaly over the north Pacific (NPAC). The strong NPAC extended to East Asia in a zonal direction, causing strong warm anomalies in eastern China through warm advection and diabatic heating, which weakened the northerly and prevented the East Asian trough from moving south, resulting in a warmer East Asia and a uniform decrease in late winter.
C1 [Dong, Wei; Shen, Xinyong; Yao, Haoxin] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast andEvaluat Meteoro, Joint Int ResearchLaboratory Climate & Environm Ch, Key Lab Meteorol Disaster,Minist Educ, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
   [Dong, Wei] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Earth Sci, Key Lab Geosci Big Data & Deep Resource Zhejiang P, Hangzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Zhao, Liang; Yao, Haoxin] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, State Key Lab Numer Modeling Atmosphere Sci & Geop, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Cheng, Wei] Beijing Inst Appl Meteorol, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Guo, Chunyan] Inner Mongolia Meteorol Serv Ctr, Hohhot, Peoples R China.
   [Shen, Xinyong] Southern MarineScience & Engn Guangdong Lab, Zhuhai, Peoples R China.
C3 Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology; Zhejiang
   University; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Atmospheric
   Physics, CAS
RP Shen, XY (corresponding author), Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast andEvaluat Meteoro, Joint Int ResearchLaboratory Climate & Environm Ch, Key Lab Meteorol Disaster,Minist Educ, Nanjing, Peoples R China.; Zhao, L (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, State Key Lab Numer Modeling Atmosphere Sci & Geop, Beijing, Peoples R China.; Cheng, W (corresponding author), Beijing Inst Appl Meteorol, Beijing, Peoples R China.; Guo, CY (corresponding author), Inner Mongolia Meteorol Serv Ctr, Hohhot, Peoples R China.; Shen, XY (corresponding author), Southern MarineScience & Engn Guangdong Lab, Zhuhai, Peoples R China.
EM zhaol@lasg.iap.ac.cn; chengw@mail.iap.ac.cn; guocy1266@126.com;
   shenxy@nuist.edu.cn
RI Cheng, Wei/AAT-4170-2020; Zhao, Liang/D-7190-2014
OI Cheng, Wei/0000-0001-7686-775X; Yao, haoxin/0000-0002-9200-8426; Dong,
   Wei/0000-0001-9821-2877
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China; Chinese Academy of
   Sciences [41790471, 42075040, 41975054]; National Key Research and
   Development Program of China [XDA20100304];  [2018YFA0606203]; 
   [2019YFC1510400]
FX This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (41790471, 42075040, 41975054), the Strategic Priority Research
   Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA20100304), and the
   National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFA0606203,
   2019YFC1510400).
CR Chen XD, 2018, J CLIMATE, V31, P2267, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0194.1
   Cohen J, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P20, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0662-y
   Dai HX, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.852673
   Dai HX, 2019, J CLIMATE, V32, P6365, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0804.1
   Detring C, 2021, WEATHER CLIM DYNAM, V2, P927, DOI 10.5194/wcd-2-927-2021
   Ding Yihui, 2007, Acta Meteorologica Sinica, V65, P695
   Dong W, 2020, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/atmos11020215
   Fu DX, 2021, INT J CLIMATOL, V41, P2480, DOI 10.1002/joc.6970
   Gong DY, 2001, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V28, P2073, DOI 10.1029/2000GL012311
   Guan WN, 2020, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V47, DOI 10.1029/2020GL088599
   [韩荣青 Han Rongqing], 2021, [气象, Meteorological Monthly], V47, P880
   Hassanzadeh P, 2015, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V42, P8586, DOI 10.1002/2015GL065923
   He B, 2020, ADV ATMOS SCI, V37, P18, DOI 10.1007/s00376-019-9085-y
   He B, 2019, ADV ATMOS SCI, V36, P771, DOI 10.1007/s00376-019-9027-8
   He SP, 2020, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V47, DOI 10.1029/2020GL087212
   He SP, 2017, EARTH-SCI REV, V164, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.10.014
   Hersbach H., 2016, ECMWF Newsletter 147, P7
   Huang Jiayou, 2006, Acta Meteorologica Sinica, V64, P614
   Jhun JG, 2004, J CLIMATE, V17, P711, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<0711:ANEAWM>2.0.CO;2
   Johnson NC, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-04040-y
   Kim HJ, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-83486-5
   Labe Z, 2020, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V47, DOI 10.1029/2020GL088583
   Li F, 2014, J CLIMATE, V27, P5075, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00335.1
   Li H, 2021, J CLIMATE, V34, P1601, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0048.1
   Lin DW, 2018, ATMOS OCEAN SCI LETT, V11, P404, DOI 10.1080/16742834.2018.1505405
   Long SM, 2021, ADV ATMOS SCI, V38, P203, DOI 10.1007/s00376-020-0177-5
   Lü ZZ, 2020, J CLIMATE, V33, P527, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0861.1
   Luo DH, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P3569, DOI [10.1175/jcli-d-16-0262.1, 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0262.1]
   Luo DH, 2016, J CLIMATE, V29, P3925, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0611.1
   Park TW, 2011, J CLIMATE, V24, P68, DOI 10.1175/2010JCLI3529.1
   [祁莉 Qi Li], 2021, [大气科学, Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences], V45, P1039
   Si D, 2021, ATMOS SCI LETT, V22, DOI 10.1002/asl.1056
   TRENBERTH KE, 1990, B AM METEOROL SOC, V71, P988, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1990)071<0988:ROICCI>2.0.CO;2
   Tyrlis E, 2021, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V147, P1070, DOI 10.1002/qj.3960
   [韦玮 Wei Wei], 2020, [大气科学, Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences], V44, P122
   Woollings T, 2018, CURR CLIM CHANGE REP, V4, P287, DOI 10.1007/s40641-018-0108-z
   Wu BY, 2002, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V29, DOI 10.1029/2002GL015373
   Xu XP, 2018, ADV ATMOS SCI, V35, P737, DOI 10.1007/s00376-017-7059-5
   Yang S, 2002, J CLIMATE, V15, P306, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<0306:VOTEAJ>2.0.CO;2
   Yu MJ, 2022, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V49, DOI 10.1029/2021GL097233
   Yun J, 2018, CLIM DYNAM, V51, P1375, DOI 10.1007/s00382-017-3960-y
   Zhang XB, 2011, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V2, P851, DOI 10.1002/wcc.147
   Zhang Y, 1997, MON WEATHER REV, V125, P2605, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<2605:CAIVOT>2.0.CO;2
   Zhang YJ, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac1f46
   Zhou ST, 2001, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V28, P4107, DOI 10.1029/2001GL013660
NR 45
TC 1
Z9 2
U1 7
U2 34
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-665X
J9 FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ
JI Front. Environ. Sci.
PD AUG 10
PY 2022
VL 10
AR 923228
DI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.923228
PG 16
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 6P9TT
UT WOS:000891267000001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Eitzel, MV
   Solera, J
   Wilson, KB
   Neves, K
   Fisher, AC
   Veski, A
   Omoju, OE
   Ndlovu, AM
   Hove, EM
AF Eitzel, M., V
   Solera, Jon
   Wilson, K. B.
   Neves, Kleber
   Fisher, Aaron C.
   Veski, Andre
   Omoju, Oluwasola E.
   Ndlovu, Abraham Mawere
   Hove, Emmanuel Mhike
TI Indigenous climate adaptation sovereignty in a Zimbabwean agro-pastoral
   system: exploring definitions of sustainability success using a
   participatory agent-based model
SO ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE community-based research; Indigenous climate sovereignty; Indigenous
   knowledge systems; local ecological knowledge; participatory modeling;
   traditional ecological knowledge; Zimbabwe Agro-Pastoral Management
   Model
ID LOCAL KNOWLEDGE; DYNAMICS TYPE; PERCEPTIONS; STRATEGIES; VALIDATION;
   MANAGEMENT; PEOPLES; LAND
AB Indigenous peoples are experiencing a wide range of negative impacts due to climate change and should have the right to determine for themselves how to adapt to these changes and define successful adaptation. These adaptations can then be culturally appropriate and grounded in Indigenous knowledge systems; however, the accelerating rate of change in social-ecological systems can be a challenge for traditional knowledge. Appropriate participatory modeling tools such as agent-based models (ABMs) may be of assistance to Indigenous groups in thinking through how systems may change in the future. Using the Zimbabwe Agro-Pastoral Management Model (a community-based ABM cocreated with farmer-researchers in Mazvihwa Communal Area), we explored how different definitions of sustainability affected the conclusions from the model, including average annual harvest and the persistence of resources (livestock, harvest, and woodland biomass) in the modeled system above minimum thresholds. For very low persistence thresholds, these two measures of success traded off against each other (with higher cropland proportions favoring harvest success and lower cropland proportions favoring persistence success); and different combinations of management interventions favored one or the other definition of sustainability. New insights came from community suggestions of higher persistence thresholds for livestock, crops, and woodland, whereby the model suggested that an intermediate proportion of cropland could be most successful. In all cases, higher year-to-year rainfall variation reduced sustainability success, regardless of the definition or thresholds used. Cocreating, cotesting, and coadaptation of the model and the use of multiple definitions rendered the findings more relevant for local application. The community in Mazvihwa has many ways to adapt to challenging circumstances, and local nongovernmental organization The Muonde Trust has used the model to work with local leaders to support collective action on land use planning to protect woodland from deforestation.
C1 [Eitzel, M., V] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA.
   [Solera, Jon] Seven Points Consulting, San Diego, CA USA.
   [Wilson, K. B.; Ndlovu, Abraham Mawere; Hove, Emmanuel Mhike] Muonde Trust, Zvishavane Dist, Zimbabwe.
   [Neves, Kleber] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
   [Fisher, Aaron C.] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA USA.
   [Veski, Andre] Tallinn Univ Technol, Tallinn, Estonia.
   [Omoju, Oluwasola E.] Natl Inst Legislat & Democrat Studies Natl Assemb, Abuja, Nigeria.
C3 University of California System; University of California Santa Cruz;
   Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; United States Department of
   Energy (DOE); Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory; Tallinn University
   of Technology
RP Eitzel, MV (corresponding author), Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA.
OI Fisher, Aaron/0000-0002-6926-4368
FU United States National Science Foundation [1415130]; Direct For Social,
   Behav & Economic Scie [1415130] Funding Source: National Science
   Foundation; Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [1415130] Funding
   Source: National Science Foundation
FX We gratefully acknowledge the Santa Fe Institute for hosting the initial
   collaborations during their 2015 Complex Systems Summer School, as well
   as affiliates Stephen Guerin, Andrew Berdahl, Joshua Epstein, andfellow
   student Juan Carlos Castilla for advice in our initial modeling efforts,
   and Isaac Ullah and Matthew Potts for additional advice. Tallinn
   University of Technology gave us time on their high-performance
   computing cluster for our initial Behavior Space parameter sweeps, and
   supported A. Veski's travel to the Summer School. This work would be
   impossible without the many dedicated members of the Muonde Trust who
   have gathered data over the last 35 years, and we are especially
   grateful to those who participated in our model development workshops:
   Handsome Madyakuseni, Austen Mugiya, Tatenda Simbini Moyo, Britain Hove,
   Nehemiah Hove, Khaniziwe Chakavanda, Simon Ndhlovu, Sikhangezile
   Madzore, Innocent Ndlovu, Blessed Chikunya, Maria Fundu, Lucia Dube,
   Guilter Shumba, Ndakaziva Hove, Sarah Tobaiwa, Moses Ndhlovu, Adnomore
   Chirindira, Oliver Chikamba, Cephas Ndhlovu, Esther Banda, Egness
   Masocha, Abraham Ndhlovu, Princess Moyo, Godknows Chinguo, Nenero Hove,
   Hosea Ndlovu, Valising Mutombo, Beulah Ngwenya, Ruth Munhundagwa, Vonai
   Ngwenya, Nyengeterai Ngandu, Saori Ogura, Alejandra Cano. Finally, we
   thank Trevor Caughlin for comments on a draft of the manuscript.
   Publication costs, M V. Eitzel's salary and travel, and the community
   -based workshops were supported by the United States National Science
   Foundation under Award Number 1415130. NSF had no involvement in study
   design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of
   thepaper; or the decision to submit for publication.
CR Ahmed MNQ, 2019, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V21, P679, DOI 10.1007/s10668-017-0055-1
   Aniah P, 2019, HELIYON, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01492
   [Anonymous], 2007, Water for food, Water for life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture
   [Anonymous], 2018, PYTH LANG REF VERS 2
   Aryal S, 2016, CLIM DEV, V8, P435, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2015.1040718
   BARLAS Y, 1989, EUR J OPER RES, V42, P59, DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(89)90059-3
   Boillat S, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05894-180421
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Castellani B, 2019, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V22, P403, DOI 10.1080/13645579.2018.1563972
   Cochran P, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V120, P557, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0735-2
   Cozzetto K., 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE INDIG, P61, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-05266-3_6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-05266-3_6]
   d'Aquino P, 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V132, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.011
   Davidson-Hunt I.J., 2012, SAPI EN. S. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society
   Doyle JT., 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE INDIG, P135, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-05266-3_11, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-05266-3_11]
   Eitzel MV, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0237638
   Eitzel M. V, 2018, COMSES COMPUTATIONAL, DOI [10.25937/ ta23-sn46, DOI 10.25937/TA23-SN46]
   Eitzel M. V, 2016, P SANT FE I 2015 COM
   Etienne M., 2013, Companion Modelling: A Participatory Approach to Support Sustainable Development
   Ford JD, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P335, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0435-7
   Galappaththi EK, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V92, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.005
   Gautam M. R., 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE INDIG, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-05266-3_7, 10.1007/978-3-319-05266-3_]
   Grah O., 2014, Climate change and Indigenous Peoples in the United States: Impacts, experiences and actions, P149, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-05266-3_12, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-05266-3_12]
   Herman-Mercer NM, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08463-210328
   Hossain MN, 2019, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V191, DOI 10.1007/s10661-019-7256-z
   Jorgensen B., 1997, The Theory of Dispersion Models
   Jury Mark R., 2013, S. Afr. j. sci., V109, P1
   Lansing J.S., 2007, PRIESTS PROGRAMMERS, DOI [10.1515/9781400827633, DOI 10.1515/9781400827633]
   Lynn K, 2014, Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples in the United States: Impacts, Experiences and Actions, P37
   Maldonado J. K., 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE INDIG, P93, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-05266-3_8
   Mapfumo P, 2016, CLIM DEV, V8, P72, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2014.998604
   Mashizha TM, 2019, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V11, DOI 10.4102/jamba.v11i1.571
   MORAN PAP, 1950, BIOMETRIKA, V37, P17, DOI 10.2307/2332142
   Müller B, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P1857, DOI 10.1890/06-1193.1
   Nursey-Bray M, 2019, LOCAL ENVIRON, V24, P473, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2019.1590325
   Nyahunda Louis, 2019, Jàmbá, V11, P1
   Nyima Y, 2019, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V32, P965, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2019.1590667
   Patrick RJ, 2018, INT INDIG POLICY J, V9, DOI 10.18584/iipj.2018.9.3.1
   Qudrat-Ullah H, 2012, TELECOMMUN SYST, V51, P159, DOI 10.1007/s11235-011-9425-4
   R Core Team, 2020, A language and environment for statistical computing, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-86749-3
   Raygorodetsky Gleb., 2017, The Archipelago of Hope: Wisdom and Resilience from the Edge of Climate Change
   Richards G, 2019, HEALTH PROMOT CHRON, V39, P127, DOI 10.24095/hpcdp.39.4.03
   Roncoli C, 2002, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V15, P409, DOI 10.1080/08941920252866774
   Rutherford M. C., 1978, Biogeography and ecology of Southern Africa. Vol.1., P621
   Saam N.J., 2019, COMPUTER SIMULATION, P405, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-70766-2_17, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-70766-2_17]
   Scoones I, 1989, PATCH USE CATTLE DRY
   Scoones I. C, 1990, THESIS
   Shaibu MT, 2019, CLIMATE CHANGE SUBSA, P223
   Shongwe ME, 2009, J CLIMATE, V22, P3819, DOI 10.1175/2009JCLI2317.1
   Simatele D.M, 2019, CLIM DEV, V11, P112, DOI [10.1080/17565529.2017.1374239, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1374239]
   Simonetti C, 2019, J ROY ANTHROPOL INST, V25, P241, DOI 10.1111/1467-9655.13024
   Smith P. I., 2017, THESIS
   Spies TA, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI 10.5751/ES-08841-220125
   Turner N, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05981-180429
   Tweedie M. C. K., 1984, Proc. Indian statistical institute golden jubilee international conference, P579
   Valdivia C, 2010, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V100, P818, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2010.500198
   Voggesser G., 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE INDIG, P107, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-05266-3_9
   Voinov A, 2010, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V25, P1268, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007
   Wilensky U., 1999, CTR CONNECTED LEARNI
   Wilson KennethB., 1990, Ecological Dynamics and Human Welfare: a Case Study of Health, Diet and Nutrition in Southern Zimbabwe
   Witoshynsky M., 2000, COMSES COMPUTATIONAL, DOI DOI 10.25937/TA23-SN46
   Woittiez LS, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05705-180424
   Wood S.N, 2017, Chapman & Hall/CRC texts in statistical science
NR 62
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 1
U2 27
PU RESILIENCE ALLIANCE
PI WOLFVILLE
PA ACADIA UNIV, BIOLOGY DEPT, WOLFVILLE, NS B0P 1X0, CANADA
SN 1708-3087
J9 ECOL SOC
JI Ecol. Soc.
PD DEC
PY 2020
VL 25
IS 4
AR 13
DI 10.5751/ES-11946-250413
PG 46
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA PM7SY
UT WOS:000603995100027
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sankey, T
   Hultine, K
   Blasini, D
   Koepke, D
   Bransky, N
   Grady, K
   Cooper, H
   Gehring, C
   Allan, G
AF Sankey, Temuulen
   Hultine, Kevin
   Blasini, Davis
   Koepke, Dan
   Bransky, Nathaniel
   Grady, Kevin
   Cooper, Hillary
   Gehring, Catherine
   Allan, Gerard
TI UAV thermal image detects genetic trait differences among populations
   and genotypes of Fremont cottonwood (<i>Populus fremontii</i>,
   Salicaceae)
SO REMOTE SENSING IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION
LA English
DT Article
DE Genetics; high-throughput phenotyping; intraspecific detection;
   phenotyping; tree canopy temperatures; UAV thermal images
ID UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ASSISTED MIGRATION; WATER
   INDEX; LEAF; TREE; REFLECTANCE; ADAPTATION; SCALE; COMMUNITIES
AB Many plants are becoming increasingly maladapted to their environments due to changing climate and environmental conditions. It is, therefore, important to quantitatively evaluate what species, populations, and genotypes will survive in projected climate change scenarios and the implications this can have for associated biodiversity. We evaluate unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based high-resolution thermal images for differentiating populations and genotypes in Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii S. Wats.), a foundation tree species that supports high levels of biodiversity and associated processes in riparian ecosystems. Specifically, we compare UAV thermal image-derived tree canopy temperatures among 16 different populations and 10 replicated genotypes within two of the populations of Fremont cottonwood trees sourced from a broad environmental gradient and growing together in a common garden in central Arizona, USA. The UAV image-derived tree canopy temperatures ranged 30 degrees C-42 degrees C resulting in a high overall accuracy of 85% in tree canopy classification. Our results indicate that the UAV thermal image-derived mean tree canopy temperatures were significantly different among most of the 16 populations (P < 0.001). Within a warm-adapted Sonoran Desert population and a cooler High Plateau population, the UAV thermal image-derived tree canopy temperatures were also significantly different among many genotypes (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the UAV thermal image-derived tree canopy temperatures were significantly correlated with tree canopy cover (R-2 = 0.73; P-value < 0.001) and varied with locations across the garden. Our findings have important implications for characterizing intraspecific genetic diversity in long-lived forest trees like Fremont cottonwood and inferences for understanding ecosystem processes and guiding restoration efforts. We suggest that UAV thermal images can be used to rapidly scale laboratory- and plot-based genetics research up to the landscape level. Ecological restoration efforts informed by projected climate scenarios can benefit from the UAV-based genetics findings to identify future climate-adapted populations and genotypes for potential propagation sources.
C1 [Sankey, Temuulen; Bransky, Nathaniel] No Arizona Univ, Sch Informat Comp & Cyber Syst, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA.
   [Hultine, Kevin; Blasini, Davis; Koepke, Dan] Desert Bot Garden, Dept Res Conservat & Collect, Phoenix, AZ 85008 USA.
   [Grady, Kevin] No Arizona Univ, Sch Forestry, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA.
   [Cooper, Hillary; Gehring, Catherine; Allan, Gerard] No Arizona Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA.
   [Cooper, Hillary; Gehring, Catherine; Allan, Gerard] No Arizona Univ, Merriam Powell Ctr Environm Res, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA.
C3 Northern Arizona University; Northern Arizona University; Northern
   Arizona University; Northern Arizona University
RP Sankey, T (corresponding author), No Arizona Univ, 1298 S Knoles Dr, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA.
EM temuulen.sankey@nau.edu
RI Grady, Kevin/L-4638-2013
OI Bransky, Nathaniel/0000-0003-3113-7491; Sankey,
   Temuulen/0000-0002-6919-8428
CR Aitken SN, 2008, EVOL APPL, V1, P95, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2007.00013.x
   Aitken SN, 2013, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V44, P367, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135747
   Ampatzidis Y, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11040410
   Anderson K, 2013, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V11, P138, DOI 10.1890/120150
   Asner GP, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, pE4043, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1604863113
   Ault TR, 2014, J CLIMATE, V27, P7529, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00282.1
   Axelsson EP, 2020, RESTOR ECOL, V28, P156, DOI 10.1111/rec.13030
   Belmonte A, 2020, REMOTE SENS ECOL CON, V6, P181, DOI 10.1002/rse2.137
   Bjorkman AD, 2018, NATURE, V562, P57, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0563-7
   Blonder B, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V262, P354, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.07.012
   Ceccato P, 2001, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V77, P22, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00191-2
   Champagne C., 2001, P 8 INT S PHYS MEAS, P79
   Compson ZG, 2018, ECOLOGY, V99, P1759, DOI 10.1002/ecy.2224
   Congalton R.G., 2009, Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices, V2, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1477-9730.2010.005742.X, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9730.2010.005742.x, 10.1111/j.1477-9730.2010.00574 2.x]
   Cooper HF, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P187, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14494
   Cunliffe AM, 2016, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V183, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2016.05.019
   Cushman SA, 2014, ECOL APPL, V24, P1000, DOI 10.1890/13-1612.1
   Elkind K, 2019, REMOTE SENS ECOL CON, V5, P318, DOI 10.1002/rse2.116
   FARQUHAR GD, 1982, ANNU REV PLANT PHYS, V33, P317, DOI 10.1146/annurev.pp.33.060182.001533
   Gao BC, 1996, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V58, P257, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00067-3
   GATES DM, 1968, ANN REV PLANT PHYSIO, V19, P211, DOI 10.1146/annurev.pp.19.060168.001235
   Gonzalez-Dugo V, 2013, PRECIS AGRIC, V14, P660, DOI 10.1007/s11119-013-9322-9
   Grady KC, 2017, OIKOS, V126, P583, DOI 10.1111/oik.03240
   Grady KC, 2015, RESTOR ECOL, V23, P811, DOI 10.1111/rec.12245
   Grady KC, 2013, FUNCT ECOL, V27, P428, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12060
   Hanson MA, 2012, SCIENCE, V335, P851, DOI [10.1126/science.1244693, 10.1126/science.1215904]
   HARDISKY MA, 1983, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V49, P77
   Hewitt N, 2011, BIOL CONSERV, V144, P2560, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.031
   Horton JL, 2001, TREE PHYSIOL, V21, P233, DOI 10.1093/treephys/21.4.233
   Hultine KR, 2020, CONSERV PHYSIOL, V8, DOI 10.1093/conphys/coaa061
   Hultine KR, 2020, HYDROL PROCESS, V34, P209, DOI 10.1002/hyp.13587
   HUNT ER, 1989, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V30, P43, DOI 10.1016/0034-4257(89)90046-1
   Ikeda DH, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P164, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13470
   Ikeda DH, 2014, FUNCT ECOL, V28, P65, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12151
   Jackson TJ, 2004, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V92, P475, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2003.10.021
   Kattenborn T, 2019, REMOTE SENS ECOL CON, V5, P5, DOI 10.1002/rse2.86
   Keith AR, 2017, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V284, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2016.2703
   Laforest-Lapointe I, 2014, OECOLOGIA, V175, P1337, DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-2967-x
   Laliberte AS, 2009, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V47, P761, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2008.2009355
   Lamit LJ, 2015, J ECOL, V103, P840, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12416
   LeRoy CJ, 2007, J N AM BENTHOL SOC, V26, P426, DOI 10.1899/06-113.1
   Ludovisi R, 2017, FRONT PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01681
   Madritch MD, 2014, PHILOS T R SOC B, V369, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2013.0194
   Michaletz ST, 2015, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V30, P714, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.006
   Mildrexler DJ, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V116, DOI 10.1029/2010JG001486
   PENUELAS J, 1993, INT J REMOTE SENS, V14, P1887, DOI 10.1080/01431169308954010
   Pincetl S, 2013, NCA REGION INPUT REP, P267, DOI 10.5822/978-1-61091-484-0_13
   Rambo TR, 2009, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V257, P435, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.029
   Rango A, 2006, ENVIRON PRAC, V8, P159, DOI 10.1017/S1466046606060224
   Sagan V, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11030330
   Sankaran S, 2015, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V118, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2015.09.001
   Sankey T, 2017, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V195, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2017.04.007
   Sankey T, 2014, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V80, P885, DOI 10.14358/PERS.80.9.885
   Sankey T, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V118, P1144, DOI 10.1002/jgrg.20088
   Sankey TT, 2018, REMOTE SENS ECOL CON, V4, P20, DOI 10.1002/rse2.44
   Sankey TT, 2019, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V72, P858, DOI 10.1016/j.rama.2019.04.002
   Sankey TT, 2009, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V1, P896, DOI 10.3390/rs1040896
   Santini F., 2019, ANN APPL BIOL, V1, P1
   Shin P, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10081266
   Solazzo D, 2018, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V319, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.07.023
   Stone AC, 2018, FRONT PLANT SCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.01831
   Tattaris M, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.01131
   Vivoni ER, 2014, ECOSPHERE, V5, DOI 10.1890/ES14-00217.1
   Whitham TG, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P492, DOI 10.1126/science.1153918
   Whitham TG, 2006, NAT REV GENET, V7, P510, DOI 10.1038/nrg1877
   Wilby RL, 2009, INT J CLIMATOL, V29, P1193, DOI 10.1002/joc.1839
   Wright JP, 2016, PHILOS T R SOC B, V371, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2015.0272
   Wulder MA, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V225, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.015
   Yang GJ, 2017, FRONT PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01111
   Zhao X, 2019, SENSORS-BASEL, V19, DOI 10.3390/s19183859
NR 70
TC 6
Z9 10
U1 2
U2 30
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA
EI 2056-3485
J9 REMOTE SENS ECOL CON
JI Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv.
PD JUN
PY 2021
VL 7
IS 2
BP 245
EP 258
DI 10.1002/rse2.185
EA NOV 2020
PG 14
WC Ecology; Remote Sensing
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Remote Sensing
GA SR8XE
UT WOS:000590121100001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Bayhan, HG
   Karaca, E
AF Bayhan, Hasan Gokberk
   Karaca, Ece
GP IOP
TI SWOT Analysis of Biomimicry for Sustainable Buildings - A Literature
   Review of the Importance of Kinetic Architecture Applications in
   Sustainable Construction Projects
SO 3RD WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE, URBAN
   PLANNING SYMPOSIUM (WMCAUS 2018)
SE IOP Conference Series-Materials Science and Engineering
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT 3rd World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering, Architecture, Urban
   Planning Symposium (WMCAUS)
CY JUN 18-22, 2018
CL Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC
ID MANAGEMENT; DESIGN; METHODOLOGY; ADAPTATION
AB Biomimicry is a term to explain the use of genius in nature. It basically aims to use of resources in the most effective manner while satisfying human needs. Likewise, kinetic architecture implementations and biomimicry both tend to imitate the excellent mobility of nature and kinetic architecture implementations are somehow investigated in biomimicry studies. These two inspirational concepts of nature nested each other and were integrated over time contributing to the development of sustainable building system design. However, integration of biomimicry and kinetic architecture is essential to explain sustainable buildings and their certification systems. There is still lack of knowledge in the construction industry in terms of kinetic architecture and biomimicry practices since the concepts are dynamic and perceived to be complex by the industry practitioners. Moreover, traditional structure of the construction industry considering short term profits and project-based nature makes these concepts even more challenging for the projects. Hence, it is essential to apply strength, weakness, opportunity and threat (SWOT) analysis in biomimicry and kinetic architecture implementation so that construction industry practitioners might conduct projects more effectively and satisfy project requirements in sustainable building projects. Therefore, this study adopts SWOT as the research methodology and aims to guide construction professionals to better understand these concepts. Within this perspective, this study proposes five major strengths, namely the effective use of energy, higher prestige level, climate adaptation ability, enhancing comfort and higher value and rental costs, where weaknesses are higher initial or maintenance costs, lack of systems expertise, the need for coordination of different professions, special production requirements and complexity in design. Moreover, five major opportunities and threats are suggested as top management support, sustainability focused development strategy, technological improvements, the demand increase to the environmentally responsible buildings, incentives from the governmental bodies are opportunities; unfamiliar systems, system failures, difficulties in project financing, materials do not comply with standards, and market conditions, respectively. The study is expected to reinforce the link between the design and construction processes to apply the above-mentioned concepts in sustainable buildings.
C1 [Bayhan, Hasan Gokberk] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-34295 Istanbul, Turkey.
   [Karaca, Ece] Istanbul Esenyurt Univ, Dept Architecture, TR-34510 Istanbul, Turkey.
C3 Istanbul Aydin University; Istanbul Esenyurt University
RP Bayhan, HG (corresponding author), Istanbul Aydin Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-34295 Istanbul, Turkey.
EM hgbayhan@aydin.edu.tr
RI Bayhan, Hasan/G-1571-2019
OI BAYHAN, HASAN GOKBERK/0000-0003-1207-5491
CR [Anonymous], UAP N KAHN CREATE KI
   [Anonymous], SUST ARCH BUILD DES
   [Anonymous], 21 INT C BUILD LIF N
   [Anonymous], KINETIK ARCHITECTURE
   [Anonymous], L DAVINCI
   [Anonymous], SENG 2013 C 18 20 SE
   [Anonymous], GALLERIA CENTERCITY
   [Anonymous], 2012, FUTURE COMMUNICATION
   [Anonymous], BIYOMIMIKRI VE ERGON
   [Anonymous], REINVENTING WHEEL
   [Anonymous], ARCHITECTS ARE FINDI
   [Anonymous], J CHIFENG U
   [Anonymous], LECT NOT HUM NAT CLA
   Badarnah L, 2015, ARCHIT SCI REV, V58, P120, DOI 10.1080/00038628.2014.922458
   Bell GG, 2016, INT J MANAG EDUC-OXF, V14, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.ijme.2016.06.003
   Benyus J.M., 1997, Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature
   Bower JL, 2008, J MANAGE INQUIRY, V17, P269, DOI 10.1177/1056492608318149
   Buck NT, 2017, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V44, P120, DOI 10.1177/0265813515611417
   El-Zeiny RMA, 2012, PROCD SOC BEHV, V50, P502, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.054
   ElDin NN, 2016, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V34, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.033
   Fecheyr-Lippens D, 2017, ARCHIT SCI REV, V60, P360, DOI 10.1080/00038628.2017.1359145
   Fox M.A., 2003, Transportable Environments, V2, P163
   Grigorian M, 2014, J BIONIC ENG, V11, P638, DOI 10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60075-5
   Jiang R, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V173, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.147
   Kazaz A, 2014, KSCE J CIV ENG, V18, P1934, DOI 10.1007/s12205-014-0239-2
   Kellert S, 2016, INTELL BUILD INT, V8, P51, DOI 10.1080/17508975.2014.902802
   Kennedy S., 2007, The Science Creative Quarterly
   Lurie-Luke E, 2014, BIOTECHNOL ADV, V32, P1494, DOI 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.002
   MIMS C., 2012, Corporate Knights Magazine, V11, P36
   Novicevic M.M., 2004, MARKETING INTELLIGEN, V22, P84, DOI DOI 10.1108/02634500410516931
   Oguntona OA, 2017, ENRGY PROCED, V142, P2721, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.216
   Oguntona OA, 2017, ENRGY PROCED, V142, P2491, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.188
   Reed MS, 2008, BIOL CONSERV, V141, P2417, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
   Ritu PrimlaniVasu., 2013, VILAKSHAN XIMB J MAN, V10, P139
   Sorguc AG, 2009, METU J FAC ARCHIT, V26, P235, DOI 10.4305/METU.JFA.2009.2.12
   Steffen B, 2018, ENERG ECON, V69, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.006
   Volstad NL, 2012, SUSTAIN DEV, V20, P189, DOI 10.1002/sd.1535
   Zhang YX, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V115, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.003
NR 38
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 2
U2 27
PU IOP PUBLISHING LTD
PI BRISTOL
PA DIRAC HOUSE, TEMPLE BACK, BRISTOL BS1 6BE, ENGLAND
SN 1757-8981
J9 IOP CONF SER-MAT SCI
PY 2019
VL 471
AR 082047
DI 10.1088/1757-899X/471/8/082047
PG 8
WC Architecture; Engineering, Civil; Urban Studies
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S); Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Science &amp; Humanities (CPCI-SSH)
SC Architecture; Engineering; Urban Studies
GA BM5ZD
UT WOS:000465811803093
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Swanteson-Franz, RJ
   Krofcheck, DJ
   Hurteau, MD
AF Swanteson-Franz, Rachel J.
   Krofcheck, Daniel J.
   Hurteau, Matthew D.
TI Quantifying forest carbon dynamics as a function of tree species
   composition and management under projected climate
SO ECOSPHERE
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptation; carbon; climate change; fire; forest management; mitigation;
   southern pine
ID LONGLEAF PINE; FIRE; GROWTH; MORTALITY; DROUGHT; SEQUESTRATION;
   WILDFIRE; HABITAT; TERM; US
AB Uncertainty remains about whether current rates of forest carbon uptake will be maintained with on-going climate change and increasing rates of disturbance. The potential exists for climate and disturbance to exceed the physiological tolerances of certain tree species and push forest ecosystems to a point where they become C sources. Thus, a diversity of tree species with a range of physiological tolerances could provide adaptive capacity and potentially sustain a C sink despite adverse abiotic influences. The fire-prone pine forests of the southeastern USA have been impacted by a combination of land use and fire exclusion, which has altered the demographics and composition of these historically diverse forests. We sought to quantify how prescribed fire and planting of climate-resilient tree species would alter forest carbon dynamics under projected climate change at Fort Benning, Georgia. This landscape is comprised of a diversity of forest types with a range of land-use histories and is heavily managed to meet military training objectives and federally listed species habitat requirements. We used a simulation approach to determine species-specific growth responses to projected climate and develop two management scenarios: no-management and prescribed fire coupled with planting. We ran landscape simulations of these two management scenarios under climate projections from ten global climate models to quantify how active management would alter forest carbon dynamics as a function of changing climate and wildfire. We found that the prescribed fire and plant scenario increased total ecosystem carbon (TEC) over our no-management scenario by over 20 Mg C/m(2) by late century. Despite the differences in TEC, differences in net ecosystem exchange were not realized over the entire simulation. The primary drivers of TEC differences were sustained carbon uptake and lower carbon loss to wildfire in the prescribed fire and plant scenario. Our results demonstrate that under projected climate, managing to reduce the impacts of fire and planting climate-adapted species can increase the mitigation potential of these forests.
C1 [Swanteson-Franz, Rachel J.; Krofcheck, Daniel J.; Hurteau, Matthew D.] Univ New Mexico, Dept Biol, MSC03 2020, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA.
C3 University of New Mexico
RP Hurteau, MD (corresponding author), Univ New Mexico, Dept Biol, MSC03 2020, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA.
EM mhurteau@unm.edu
RI Hurteau, Matthew/D-2301-2009
OI Hurteau, Matthew/0000-0001-8457-8974; Krofcheck, Dan/0000-0001-5549-7542
FU US Department of Defense's Strategic Environmental Research and
   Development Program (SERDP) [RC-2118]
FX Funding for this research was provided by the US Department of Defense's
   Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP, project
   RC-2118).
CR Addington RN, 2015, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V24, P778, DOI 10.1071/WF14187
   Addington RN, 2015, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V354, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.028
   Allen CD, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P660, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001
   [Anonymous], 1993, CENTURY SOIL ORGANIC
   [Anonymous], 1422 NOAA NESDIS
   [Anonymous], 2013, Web Soil Survey
   Barford CC, 2001, SCIENCE, V294, P1688, DOI 10.1126/science.1062962
   Baskaran LM, 2006, AM MIDL NAT, V155, P335, DOI 10.1674/0003-0031(2006)155[335:HMWARC]2.0.CO;2
   Bonan GB, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P1444, DOI 10.1126/science.1155121
   Breshears DD, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P15144, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0505734102
   Breshears DD, 2002, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V11, P1, DOI 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00274.x
   Campbell JL, 2012, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V10, P83, DOI 10.1890/110057
   Canadell JG, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P1456, DOI 10.1126/science.1155458
   Dangal SRS, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V119, P35, DOI 10.1002/2013JG002409
   Diffenbaugh NS, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P15774, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0506042102
   ELLIOTT KJ, 1994, J VEG SCI, V5, P229, DOI 10.2307/3236155
   Gilliam FS, 1999, PLANT ECOL, V140, P15, DOI 10.1023/A:1009776020438
   GLITZENSTEIN JS, 1995, ECOL MONOGR, V65, P441, DOI 10.2307/2963498
   Gonzalez-Benecke CA, 2015, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V355, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.02.029
   Gustafson EJ, 2000, CAN J FOREST RES, V30, P32, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-30-1-32
   Hanson PJ, 2001, TREE PHYSIOL, V21, P345, DOI 10.1093/treephys/21.6.345
   Houghton RA, 1999, TELLUS B, V51, P298, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.00013.x
   Hurteau MD, 2016, ECOL APPL, V26, P382, DOI 10.1890/15-0337
   Hurteau MD, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V315, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.012
   Hurteau MD, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P1516, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02295.x
   Kirkman LK, 2004, J ECOL, V92, P409, DOI 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00883.x
   Klos RJ, 2009, ECOL APPL, V19, P699, DOI 10.1890/08-0330.1
   Knutti R, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P369, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1716, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1716]
   Krofcheck DJ, 2017, ECOSPHERE, V8, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1663
   Laflower DM, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V362, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.12.015
   LANDERS JL, 1995, J FOREST, V93, P39
   LEMON PC, 1949, ECOLOGY, V30, P135, DOI 10.2307/1931182
   Marshall D. J., 2008, SRS110 US DEP AGR FO
   Martin KL, 2015, ECOSYSTEMS, V18, P76, DOI 10.1007/s10021-014-9813-1
   Mote P., 2011, Eos Trans. AGU, V92, P257, DOI DOI 10.1029/2011EO310001
   Mueller RC, 2005, J ECOL, V93, P1085, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01042.x
   Oswalt C. M., 2012, GTRSRS166 USDA FOR S
   Pan YD, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P988, DOI 10.1126/science.1201609
   PARTON WJ, 1993, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V7, P785, DOI 10.1029/93GB02042
   Reclamation, 2013, DOWNSC CMIP3 CMIP5 C, P104
   Rhemtulla JM, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P6082, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0810076106
   Samuelson LJ, 2018, CAN J FOREST RES, V48, P227, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2017-0357
   Samuelson LJ, 2017, ECOL APPL, V27, P244, DOI 10.1002/eap.1439
   Samuelson LJ, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V274, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.02.017
   Scheller RM, 2004, ECOL MODEL, V180, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.01.022
   Scheller RM, 2011, ECOSYSTEMS, V14, P987, DOI 10.1007/s10021-011-9462-6
   Scheller RM, 2011, ECOL MODEL, V222, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.09.009
   Seidl R, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P395, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3303, 10.1038/nclimate3303]
   Sturtevant BR, 2009, ECOL MODEL, V220, P3380, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.07.030
   Thom D, 2016, BIOL REV, V91, P760, DOI 10.1111/brv.12193
   US Army Infantry Center (USAIC), 2006, INT NAT RES MAN PLAN
   USFWS, 2003, REC PLAN RED COCK WO
   WALDROP TA, 1992, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V47, P195, DOI 10.1016/0378-1127(92)90274-D
   Wear DN, 2002, J FOREST, V100, P6
   Wiechmann ML, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V132, P709, DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1450-y
   Williams AP, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P292, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1693, 10.1038/nclimate1693]
   Zhao D., 2013, SCI REPORTS, V3, P1
   Zhao SQ, 2010, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V44, P992, DOI 10.1021/es9009019
NR 58
TC 9
Z9 12
U1 2
U2 21
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 2150-8925
J9 ECOSPHERE
JI Ecosphere
PD APR
PY 2018
VL 9
IS 4
AR e02191
DI 10.1002/ecs2.2191
PG 12
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA GJ9NK
UT WOS:000435729400019
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Koo, KA
   Kong, WS
   Park, SU
   Lee, JH
   Kim, J
   Jung, H
AF Koo, Kyung Ah
   Kong, Woo-Seok
   Park, Seon Uk
   Lee, Joon Ho
   Kim, Jaeuk
   Jung, Huicheul
TI Sensitivity of Korean fir (<i>Abies koreana</i> Wils.), a threatened
   climate relict species, to increasing temperature at an island subalpine
   area
SO ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
LA English
DT Article; Proceedings Paper
CT China-Korea Joint Seminars on Multi-Disciplinary and Multi-Method
   Approaches Toward Sustainable Human and Nature Interactions
CY 2015
CL Seoul, SOUTH KOREA
DE Korean fir (Abies koreana); Global warming; Endangered; Species
   distribution model; The Republic of Korea
ID DISTRIBUTION MODELS; JEJU ISLAND; PLANT; ALPS; MICROREFUGIA;
   RESPIRATION; POPULATIONS; VEGETATION; PREDICT; GROWTH
AB The Korean fir (Abies koreana), a subalpine cold-adapted climatic relict, has declined in the Republic of Korea (ROK) since the 1980's, and IUCN 3.1 has assessed it as a species endangered by global warming. We projected thermal habitat suitability for Korean fir at the subalpine zone of Mt. Halla (>1300 m a.s.l.), ROK, using high-resolution microclimatic and topographic variables (30 x 30 m resolution) and forecasted the effects of global warming on thermal suitability at a local scale. These analyses resulted in a more precise definition of the thermal niche of the species, reflecting topoclimatic conditions. We used three single and one ensemble species distribution models (SDMs) for the projection. The results showed that Korean fir was sensitive to heat stress and heat-associated drought stress, showing a strong preference for sites with low temperature, low radiation and near streams. Thermal habitat suitability therefore increased from the southwest (lowland areas) to the northeast (higher elevation areas). All SDMs effectively captured thermal microrefugia, such as north-facing slope, thermally suitable patches and sites near streams at Mt. Halla. In particular, thermal microrefugia successively explained small populations of Korean fir in the south area. All SDMs forecasted that thermal habitat suitability decreased under increasing temperature, with the area of thermally suitable habitats decreasing 80.2% to 94.8% under a 2 degrees C increase scenario. We conclude that Korean fir will likely experience degradation in thermal habitat suitability under rising temperature, with upslope shifts of populations potentially causing continued local decline. However, the extent of decline will depend on metapopulation dynamics among thermal microrefugia and other biotic and abiotic factors. Hence, we need to implement much ecological and physiological research to improve the predictive power of climate response models, and to protect thermal microrefugia from competing and invasive species in order to buffer the upward range shift of Korean fir at Mt. Halla under global warming. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Koo, Kyung Ah; Park, Seon Uk] Natl Inst Ecol, Chungnam, South Korea.
   [Kong, Woo-Seok; Lee, Joon Ho] Kyung Hee Univ, Seoul, South Korea.
   [Kim, Jaeuk; Jung, Huicheul] Korea Environm Inst, Sejong Si, South Korea.
C3 National Institute of Ecology; Kyung Hee University; Korea Environment
   Institute (KEI)
RP Kong, WS (corresponding author), Kyung Hee Univ, Dept Geog, 26 Kyungheedae Ro, Seoul 02447, South Korea.
EM kyungah.koo@gmail.com; wskong@khu.ac.kr; psu1201@nie.re.kr;
   j.h.lee@khu.ac.kr; jukim@kei.re.kr; hchjung@kei.re.kr
RI Koo, Kyung/A-7523-2015
OI Park, Seon Uk/0000-0002-2212-9353
FU project of Korea Environmental Institute, "Development of Climate Change
   Policy Supporting Model for Impact Assessment and Adaptation Planning" -
   Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute, the Republic of
   Korea [2014001310005]
FX We would like to thank Emily Davenport for her help reading and
   commenting on our writing. This work was supported by the project of
   Korea Environmental Institute, "Development of Climate Change Policy
   Supporting Model for Impact Assessment and Adaptation Planning (project
   number: 2014001310005)", funded by Korea Environmental Industry &
   Technology Institute, the Republic of Korea.
CR Díaz-Varela RA, 2010, ECOL MODEL, V221, P621, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.11.010
   Allen C. D., 2009, Unasylva (English ed.), V60, P43
   Allouche O, 2006, J APPL ECOL, V43, P1223, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x
   [Anonymous], 2008, Plant Physiological Ecology
   [Anonymous], R PACKAGE VERSION
   [Anonymous], PACKAGE EARTH 3 2 1
   [Anonymous], TREE PHYSL
   Araújo MB, 2005, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V14, P529, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-822x.2005.00182.x
   Araújo MB, 2007, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V22, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010
   Atkin OK, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P500, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01114.x
   Bauert MR, 1998, MOL ECOL, V7, P1519, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00470.x
   Bell DM, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P1441, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12504
   Breiman L., 2001, Machine Learning, V45, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Linares JC, 2012, EUR J FOREST RES, V131, P1001, DOI 10.1007/s10342-011-0572-7
   Chung CH, 2007, GEOSCI J, V11, P147, DOI 10.1007/BF02913928
   Crossman ND, 2012, DIVERS DISTRIB, V18, P60, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00851.x
   Cutler DR, 2007, ECOLOGY, V88, P2783, DOI 10.1890/07-0539.1
   Daly C, 2006, INT J CLIMATOL, V26, P707, DOI 10.1002/joc.1322
   Daly C, 2010, INT J CLIMATOL, V30, P1857, DOI 10.1002/joc.2007
   Dirnböck T, 2003, J BIOGEOGR, V30, P401, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00839.x
   Dobrowski SZ, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P1022, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02263.x
   Dumais D, 2007, FOREST CHRON, V83, P378, DOI 10.5558/tfc83378-3
   Edenborn HM, 2012, PERMAFROST PERIGLAC, V23, P187, DOI 10.1002/ppp.1742
   Elith J, 2006, ECOGRAPHY, V29, P129, DOI 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
   Elith J., 2007, DIVERS DISTRIB
   Elith J, 2009, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V40, P677, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159
   Ernakovich JG, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P3256, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12568
   Evans JS, 2011, PREDICTIVE SPECIES AND HABITAT MODELING IN LANDSCAPE ECOLOOGY: CONCEPTS AND APPLICATIONS, P139, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7390-0_8
   Evans JS, 2009, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V24, P673, DOI 10.1007/s10980-009-9341-0
   Feeley KJ, 2011, J BIOGEOGR, V38, P783, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02444.x
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Flagmeier M, 2014, PLANT ECOL DIVERS, V7, P457, DOI 10.1080/17550874.2013.817487
   Freeman EA, 2008, J STAT SOFTW, V23, P1
   FRIEDMAN JH, 1991, ANN STAT, V19, P1, DOI 10.1214/aos/1176347963
   Gavin DG, 2014, NEW PHYTOL, V204, P37, DOI 10.1111/nph.12929
   Geiger R., 2009, CLIMATE NEAR GROUND, V7th
   Gentili R, 2015, ECOL COMPLEX, V21, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2014.11.006
   Gharun M, 2015, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V200, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.09.027
   Gong LB, 2006, J HYDROL, V329, P620, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.03.027
   Gregory AW, 2001, J BUS ECON STAT, V19, P34, DOI 10.1198/07350010152472599
   Guisan A, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P993, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x
   Guisan A., 2000, Integr Assess, V1, P307, DOI [DOI 10.1023/A:1018912114948, 10.1023/A:1018912114948]
   Hagedorn B, 2014, GEOSCI J, V18, P381
   Hampe A, 2011, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V42, P313, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145015
   Hamrick JL, 2004, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V197, P323, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.023
   HEIDE OM, 1993, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V88, P531, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1993.tb01368.x
   Heskel MA, 2014, FUNCT PLANT BIOL, V41, P287, DOI 10.1071/FP13137
   Hong Y.P., 2011, J KOREAN FOR SOC, V100
   Hutchinson G.E., 1965, ECOLOGICAL THEATRE E, P26
   송국만, 2014, [JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 한국환경과학회지], V23, P39, DOI 10.5322/JESI.2014.23.1.39
   Jiménez-Valverde A, 2007, ACTA OECOL, V31, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.actao.2007.02.001
   Johnson JB, 2004, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V19, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.013
   Jones MM, 2006, J ECOL, V94, P181, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01071.x
   Jump AS, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P2163, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01250.x
   Kearney MR, 2010, CONSERV LETT, V3, P203, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00097.x
   Kim C., 1985, REP SURV STUDY MT HA, P311
   Kim K., 2001, J KOREAN REG GEOGR, V7, P29
   Kim T, 2008, MT RES DEV, V28, P272, DOI 10.1659/mrd.0890
   Kim YS., 2011, Abies koreana. The IUCN red list of threatened species
   Kiviniemi K, 1999, OIKOS, V86, P241, DOI 10.2307/3546442
   Koo KA., 2001, Korean J Ecol, V24, P281
   LANDIS JR, 1977, BIOMETRICS, V33, P159, DOI 10.2307/2529310
   LARIGAUDERIE A, 1995, ANN BOT-LONDON, V76, P245, DOI 10.1006/anbo.1995.1093
   Lee MW., 1982, Sci Report Tohoku Univ Sendai, V15, P177
   Lim J.H., 2006, J KOREAN FOR SOC, V95, P6
   Lundquist JD, 2007, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V112, DOI 10.1029/2006JD007561
   Lyet A, 2013, DIVERS DISTRIB, V19, P651, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12037
   Marmion M, 2009, DIVERS DISTRIB, V15, P59, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00491.x
   Matteodo M, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024043
   MOONEY HA, 1961, ECOL MONOGR, V31, P1, DOI 10.2307/1950744
   Moyes A.B., 2015, NEW PHYTOL
   Murphy MA, 2010, ECOLOGY, V91, P252, DOI 10.1890/08-0879.1
   Oh S.H.J.Y.C., 2015, FOREST KOREA 1 CONSE
   Oleksyn J, 1998, FUNCT ECOL, V12, P573, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00236.x
   Patsiou TS, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P2286, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12515
   Pauli H, 2012, SCIENCE, V336, P353, DOI 10.1126/science.1219033
   PEARSON R.G., 2007, SYNTHESIS, DOI DOI 10.5531/CBC.NCEP.0184
   Pulido F, 2008, J BIOGEOGR, V35, P1425, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01898.x
   PULLIAM HR, 1988, AM NAT, V132, P652, DOI 10.1086/284880
   Pulliam HR, 2000, ECOL LETT, V3, P349, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00143.x
   Ramirez JM, 2006, ECOGRAPHY, V29, P375, DOI 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04544.x
   Randin CF, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P1557, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01766.x
   Scherrer D, 2010, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V16, P2602, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02122.x
   Sergent AS, 2014, ANN FOREST SCI, V71, P697, DOI 10.1007/s13595-012-0220-5
   Sevanto S, 2006, TREE PHYSIOL, V26, P749, DOI 10.1093/treephys/26.6.749
   Slot M, 2014, OECOLOGIA, P1
   Song K.-M.K., 2010, J ENVIRON SCI, V19, P11
   Song Kuk-Man, 2010, [JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 한국환경과학회지], V19, P415
   Spitzer K, 2006, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V51, P137, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151036
   Sproull GJ, 2015, J VEG SCI, V26, P552, DOI 10.1111/jvs.12264
   Stöckli V, 2011, PLANT ECOL DIVERS, V4, P415, DOI 10.1080/17550874.2011.651504
   Suggitt AJ, 2011, OIKOS, V120, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18270.x
   Summers DM, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P2335, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02700.x
   Theurillat JP, 2001, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V50, P77, DOI 10.1023/A:1010632015572
   Theurillat JP, 1998, POLIT SCI ENVIRONM, P225
   Thornton PE, 1997, J HYDROL, V190, P214, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03128-9
   Thuiller W, 2004, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V10, P2020, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00859.x
   Thuiller W., 2005, Global Change Biology, V11, P2234, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1365-2486.2005.01018.X
   Uyeki Homiki., 1933, ACTA PHYTOTAX GEOBOT, V2, P73
   van Mantgem PJ, 2009, SCIENCE, V323, P521, DOI 10.1126/science.1165000
   Vanwalleghem T, 2009, ECOSYSTEMS, V12, P1158, DOI 10.1007/s10021-009-9281-1
   Williams JN, 2009, DIVERS DISTRIB, V15, P565, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00567.x
   Woo SY, 2009, AFR J BIOTECHNOL, V8, P7409
   YIM Y-J, 1975, Japanese Journal of Ecology, V25, P77
   You QL, 2008, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V35, DOI 10.1029/2007GL032669
NR 105
TC 26
Z9 30
U1 1
U2 37
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0304-3800
EI 1872-7026
J9 ECOL MODEL
JI Ecol. Model.
PD JUN 10
PY 2017
VL 353
SI SI
BP 5
EP 16
DI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.01.018
PG 12
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA EU7JS
UT WOS:000401211700002
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Mathewson, PD
   Moyer-Horner, L
   Beever, EA
   Briscoe, NJ
   Kearney, M
   Yahn, JM
   Porter, WP
AF Mathewson, Paul D.
   Moyer-Horner, Lucas
   Beever, Erik A.
   Briscoe, Natalie J.
   Kearney, Michael
   Yahn, Jeremiah M.
   Porter, Warren P.
TI Mechanistic variables can enhance predictive models of endotherm
   distributions: the American pika under current, past, and future
   climates
SO GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE activity; American pika; biophysical model; climate change; mechanistic
   model; Ochotona princeps; physiology; species distribution model;
   temperature
ID SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; OCHOTONA-PRINCEPS; BEHAVIORAL
   THERMOREGULATION; SELECTING THRESHOLDS; GREAT-BASIN; CONSERVATION;
   IMPACTS; POPULATION; BIODIVERSITY; BIOGEOGRAPHY
AB How climate constrains species' distributions through time and space is an important question in the context of conservation planning for climate change. Despite increasing awareness of the need to incorporate mechanism into species distribution models (SDMs), mechanistic modeling of endotherm distributions remains limited in this literature. Using the American pika (Ochotona princeps) as an example, we present a framework whereby mechanism can be incorporated into endotherm SDMs. Pika distribution has repeatedly been found to be constrained by warm temperatures, so we used Niche Mapper, a mechanistic heat-balance model, to convert macroclimate data to pika- specific surface activity time in summer across the western United States. We then explored the difference between using a macroclimate predictor (summer temperature) and using a mechanistic predictor (predicted surface activity time) in SDMs. Both approaches accurately predicted pika presences in current and past climate regimes. However, the activity models predicted 8-19% less habitat loss in response to annual temperature increases of similar to 3-5 degrees C predicted in the region by 2070, suggesting that pikas may be able to buffer some climate change effects through behavioral thermoregulation that can be captured by mechanistic modeling. Incorporating mechanism added value to the modeling by providing increased confidence in areas where different modeling approaches agreed and providing a range of outcomes in areas of disagreement. It also provided a more proximate variable relating animal distribution to climate, allowing investigations into how unique habitat characteristics and intraspecific phenotypic variation may allow pikas to exist in areas outside those predicted by generic SDMs. Only a small number of easily obtainable data are required to parameterize this mechanistic model for any endotherm, and its use can improve SDM predictions by explicitly modeling a widely applicable direct physiological effect: climate-imposed restrictions on activity. This more complete understanding is necessary to inform climate adaptation actions, management strategies, and conservation plans.
C1 [Mathewson, Paul D.; Moyer-Horner, Lucas; Yahn, Jeremiah M.; Porter, Warren P.] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Zool, Madison, WI 53703 USA.
   [Moyer-Horner, Lucas] Univ Utah, Dept Biol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA.
   [Beever, Erik A.] US Geol Survey, Northern Rocky Mt Sci Ctr, Bozeman, MT 59715 USA.
   [Beever, Erik A.] Montana State Univ, Dept Ecol, Bozeman, MT 59715 USA.
   [Briscoe, Natalie J.; Kearney, Michael] Univ Melbourne, Sch BioSci, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia.
C3 University of Wisconsin System; University of Wisconsin Madison; Utah
   System of Higher Education; University of Utah; United States Department
   of the Interior; United States Geological Survey; Montana State
   University System; Montana State University Bozeman; University of
   Melbourne
RP Mathewson, PD (corresponding author), Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Zool, Madison, WI 53703 USA.
EM mathewson@wisc.edu
RI Beever, Erik/Q-3869-2019; Porter, Warren/IXW-6999-2023; Kearney,
   Michael/R-3404-2017
OI Newman, Gregory/0000-0003-0503-5782; Briscoe,
   Natalie/0000-0003-0049-8956; Kearney, Michael/0000-0002-3349-8744
FU UW-Madison Zoology Department; NERP Environmental Decisions Hub; Great
   Basin LCC; Kosciuszko Foundation; Wilburforce Foundation; World Wildlife
   Fund
FX We thank Chris Lowrey, Donelle Schwalm, and one anonymous reviewer for
   insightful reviews that improved this work. We thank Chris Ray, Tom
   Rodhouse, and Matt Shinderman for sharing data on pika presence
   locations in lava-dominated landscapes. PDM thanks the UW-Madison
   Zoology Department for one summer of graduate research funding in
   support of this work. NJB was supported by NERP Environmental Decisions
   Hub. Data collection on Great Basin pikas benefited from funding by the
   Great Basin LCC, Kosciuszko Foundation, Wilburforce Foundation, and
   World Wildlife Fund. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for
   descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US
   Government.
CR Allouche O, 2006, J APPL ECOL, V43, P1223, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x
   Araújo MB, 2011, ECOL LETT, V14, P484, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01610.x
   Beever EA, 2003, J MAMMAL, V84, P37, DOI 10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084<0037:POAEAI>2.0.CO;2
   Beever EA, 2008, WEST N AM NATURALIST, V68, P8, DOI 10.3398/1527-0904(2008)68[8:APOPIN]2.0.CO;2
   Beever EA, 2016, CONSERV LETT, V9, P131, DOI 10.1111/conl.12190
   Beever EA, 2013, ECOLOGY, V94, P1563, DOI 10.1890/12-2174.1
   Beever EA, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2054, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02389.x
   Beever EA, 2010, ECOL APPL, V20, P164, DOI 10.1890/08-1011.1
   Bellard C, 2012, ECOL LETT, V15, P365, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x
   Boyles JG, 2011, INTEGR COMP BIOL, V51, P676, DOI 10.1093/icb/icr053
   Briscoe NJ, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P2425, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13280
   Buckley LB, 2008, AM NAT, V171, pE1, DOI 10.1086/523949
   Buckley LB, 2012, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V21, P873, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00737.x
   Buckley LB, 2011, ECOLOGY, V92, P2214, DOI 10.1890/11-0066.1
   Buckley LB, 2010, ECOL LETT, V13, P1041, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01479.x
   Cahill AE, 2013, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V280, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2012.1890
   Daly C, 2008, INT J CLIMATOL, V28, P2031, DOI 10.1002/joc.1688
   Dearing MD, 1997, J MAMMAL, V78, P1156, DOI 10.2307/1383058
   Dormann CF, 2012, J BIOGEOGR, V39, P2119, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02659.x
   du Plessis KL, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P3063, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02778.x
   Elith J, 2006, ECOGRAPHY, V29, P129, DOI 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
   Elith J, 2010, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V1, P330, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00036.x
   Elith J, 2009, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V40, P677, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159
   Erb LP, 2011, ECOLOGY, V92, P1730, DOI 10.1890/11-0175.1
   Evans TG, 2015, CONSERV PHYSIOL, V3, DOI 10.1093/conphys/cov056
   Franklin J, 2013, DIVERS DISTRIB, V19, P1217, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12125
   Franklin J, 2010, DIVERS DISTRIB, V16, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00641.x
   Fuentes MMPB, 2013, ECOL MODEL, V251, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.12.020
   Galbreath KE, 2009, EVOLUTION, V63, P2848, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00803.x
   Grayson DK, 2005, J BIOGEOGR, V32, P2103, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01341.x
   Guisan A, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P993, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x
   Guisan A, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P1424, DOI 10.1111/ele.12189
   Hafner DJ, 2010, J MAMMAL, V91, P401, DOI 10.1644/09-MAMM-A-277.1
   HAFNER DJ, 1993, QUATERNARY RES, V39, P373, DOI 10.1006/qres.1993.1044
   HAFNER DJ, 1994, ARCTIC ALPINE RES, V26, P375, DOI 10.2307/1551799
   HAFNER DJ, 1995, J MAMMAL, V76, P302, DOI 10.2307/1382343
   HALL E. RAYMOND, 1938, UNIV CALIFORNIA PUBL ZOOL, V42, P335
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   Jeffress MR, 2013, ECOL APPL, V23, P864, DOI 10.1890/12-0979.1
   KARASOV WH, 1992, AM ZOOL, V32, P238, DOI 10.1093/icb/32.2.238
   Kearney M, 2009, ECOL LETT, V12, P334, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01277.x
   Kearney MR, 2014, SCI DATA, V1, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2014.6
   Kearney MR, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P1470, DOI 10.1111/ele.12192
   Kearney MR, 2010, CONSERV LETT, V3, P203, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00097.x
   Kolbe JJ, 2010, ECOL APPL, V20, P2273, DOI 10.1890/09-1973.1
   La Sorte FA, 2010, J EXP BIOL, V213, P862, DOI 10.1242/jeb.038356
   Liu CR, 2013, J BIOGEOGR, V40, P778, DOI 10.1111/jbi.12058
   Liu CR, 2005, ECOGRAPHY, V28, P385, DOI 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03957.x
   Long RA, 2014, ECOL MONOGR, V84, P513, DOI 10.1890/13-1273.1
   MACARTHUR RA, 1974, CAN J ZOOL, V52, P353, DOI 10.1139/z74-042
   MACARTHUR RA, 1973, CAN J ZOOL, V51, P11, DOI 10.1139/z73-002
   Martínez-Meyer E, 2004, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V13, P305, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2004.00107.x
   Mathewson PD, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0072863
   MEAD JI, 1987, BOREAS, V16, P165
   Meineri E, 2015, BIOL REV, V90, P314, DOI 10.1111/brv.12111
   Millar CI, 2010, ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES, V42, P76, DOI 10.1657/1938-4246-42.1.76
   Morin X, 2009, ECOLOGY, V90, P1301, DOI 10.1890/08-0134.1
   Moritz C, 2008, SCIENCE, V322, P261, DOI 10.1126/science.1163428
   Moyer-Horner L, 2015, ECOL EVOL, V5, pS810, DOI 10.1002/ece3.1848
   Oswald SA, 2012, INTEGR ZOOL, V7, P121, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2012.00287.x
   Parmesan C, 2003, NATURE, V421, P37, DOI 10.1038/nature01286
   Phillips SJ, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V190, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
   Phillips SJ, 2009, ECOL APPL, V19, P181, DOI 10.1890/07-2153.1
   Porter W.P. J.W. Mitchell., 2006, Method and system for calculating the spatial-temporal effects of climate and other environmental conditions on animals
   PORTER WP, 1994, AUST J ZOOL, V42, P125, DOI 10.1071/ZO9940125
   Porter WP, 2000, AM ZOOL, V40, P597, DOI 10.1668/0003-1569(2000)040[0597:CCEOBA]2.0.CO;2
   Ray C, 2016, ECOSPHERE, V7, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1379
   Rowland EL, 2011, ENVIRON MANAGE, V47, P322, DOI 10.1007/s00267-010-9608-x
   Schwalm D, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P1572, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13189
   Schwartz MW, 2012, BIOL CONSERV, V155, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.011
   Shinderman M, 2015, ECOL EVOL, V5, P3666, DOI 10.1002/ece3.1626
   Sinervo B, 2010, SCIENCE, V328, P894, DOI 10.1126/science.1184695
   SMITH A T, 1990, Mammalian Species, P1, DOI 10.2307/3504319
   SMITH AT, 1974, ECOLOGY, V55, P1368, DOI 10.2307/1935464
   Staudinger MD, 2013, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V11, P465, DOI 10.1890/120272
   Stewart JAE, 2015, J BIOGEOGR, V42, P880, DOI 10.1111/jbi.12466
   Stocker, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013
   SWETS JA, 1988, SCIENCE, V240, P1285, DOI 10.1126/science.3287615
   Thomas CD, 2010, DIVERS DISTRIB, V16, P488, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00642.x
   Tomlinson S, 2014, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V29, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2014.03.003
   TYSER RW, 1980, AM MIDL NAT, V104, P32, DOI 10.2307/2424955
   Varner J, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0104648
   Varner J, 2014, J MAMMAL, V95, P72, DOI 10.1644/13-MAMM-A-099.1
   Veloz SD, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P1698, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02635.x
   Wilkening JL, 2011, QUATERN INT, V235, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.05.004
   Yandow LH, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0131082
NR 86
TC 92
Z9 99
U1 5
U2 112
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1354-1013
EI 1365-2486
J9 GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL
JI Glob. Change Biol.
PD MAR
PY 2017
VL 23
IS 3
BP 1048
EP 1064
DI 10.1111/gcb.13454
PG 17
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA EO6UZ
UT WOS:000396829300009
PM 27500587
OA Green Accepted, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Rezaei, A
AF Rezaei, Abolfazl
TI Large-scale climate variability footprint in water levels of alluvial
   aquifers across Iran
SO THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
ID HYDROLOGIC TIME-SERIES; NORTH-ATLANTIC; WAVELET COHERENCE; DROUGHT;
   ENSO; PRECIPITATION; OSCILLATION; TEMPERATURE; PACIFIC; OCEAN
AB The ability to predict the future variability of groundwater resources in time and space is of critical importance in society's adaptation to climate variability and change. Periodic control of large-scale ocean-atmospheric circulations on groundwater levels serves as a potentially effective source for relatively long-term forecasting. In this study, as a first national-scale assessment, we use the continuous wavelet transform, global power spectrum, and wavelet coherence analyses to quantify the linkage between the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), and El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the representative groundwater levels of the 24 principal aquifers, scattered across 14 different climate zones of Iran. Aquifer storage variations are found to be partially derived from annual to interdecadal climate variability and not solely a function of pumping variability. Moreover, teleconnections are observed to be both frequency and time-specific. The significant coherence patterns between the climate indices and groundwater levels are concentrated at five frequency bands of the annual (similar to 1 year), short-interannual (2-4 years), medium-interannual (4-6 years), decadal (8-12 years), and interdecadal (14-18 years), consistent with the dominant oscillations of climate indices. AMO's strong linkage to groundwater variability is found to be at interdecadal and annual modes of groundwater levels while PDO's highest imprint is concentrated in interannual, decadal, and interdecadal periodicities. Unlike ENSO for which the highest modulating influence is found to be across the decadal and interannual modes, the NAO's footprint in aquifers is marked at annual and interdecadal frequency bands. Findings further show that the groundwater variability is driven primarily by a combination of multiple large-scale atmospheric circulations rather than a single atmospheric circulation index. The decadal and interdecadal oscillation modes are the dominant modes in Iranian aquifers. Findings also mark the unsaturated zone contribution in damping and lagging of the climate variability modes, particularly for the higher-frequency indices of ENSO and NAO so that groundwater variability is more correlated with those climate circulations that have lower frequency such as PDO and AMO. Finally, the data length is found to have a significant effect on the teleconnections if the time series are not contemporaneous and for each particular series, only one value of coherence/correlation is computed instead of separate computations for different frequency bands and different time spans.
C1 [Rezaei, Abolfazl] Inst Adv Studies Basic Sci IASBS, Dept Earth Sci, Zanjan 4513766731, Iran.
   [Rezaei, Abolfazl] Inst Adv Studies Basic Sci IASBS, Ctr Res Climate Change & Global Warming CRCC, Zanjan, Iran.
C3 Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS); Institute for
   Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS)
RP Rezaei, A (corresponding author), Inst Adv Studies Basic Sci IASBS, Dept Earth Sci, Zanjan 4513766731, Iran.; Rezaei, A (corresponding author), Inst Adv Studies Basic Sci IASBS, Ctr Res Climate Change & Global Warming CRCC, Zanjan, Iran.
EM arezaei@iasbs.ac.ir
RI Aderiani, Abolfazl/I-3503-2017
OI Rezaei, Abolfazl/0000-0001-8619-2442
CR Abbasi M, 2017, METEOROL APPL, V24, P268, DOI 10.1002/met.1625
   Ahmadi M, 2019, DYNAM ATMOS OCEANS, V85, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2018.12.001
   Alexander M.A., 1990, Climate Dyn, V5, P53, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00195853
   Alijani B., 2000, Iran Climatology, V5th ed.
   Alizadeh-Choobari O, 2019, DYNAM ATMOS OCEANS, V86, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2019.02.001
   Alizadeh-Choobari O, 2018, INT J CLIMATOL, V38, P4239, DOI 10.1002/joc.5564
   Alizadeh-Choobari O, 2018, CLIM DYNAM, V51, P2897, DOI 10.1007/s00382-017-4055-5
   [Anonymous], 2009, WATER MANAGEMENT WAT
   Barco J, 2010, WATER RESOUR RES, V46, DOI 10.1029/2009WR008376
   Barlow MA, 2008, J HYDROMETEOROL, V9, P1334, DOI 10.1175/2008JHM976.1
   Bloomfield JP, 2013, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V17, P4769, DOI 10.5194/hess-17-4769-2013
   Brönnimann S, 2007, REV GEOPHYS, V45, DOI 10.1029/2006RG000199
   Cayan D.R., 1992, NI O, P29
   Cullen HM, 2002, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V55, P315, DOI 10.1023/A:1020518305517
   Darand M., 2014, Q J GEOGRAPHIC RES, V4, P82
   Dehghani M, 2020, ISPRS INT GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9020073
   Dezfuli AK, 2010, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V100, P57, DOI 10.1007/s00704-009-0157-2
   Dickinson J.E., 2014, U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, V4-A9, P49, DOI [10.3133/tm4a9, DOI 10.3133/TM4A9]
   Donat MG, 2014, INT J CLIMATOL, V34, P581, DOI 10.1002/joc.3707
   Graf HF, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V117, DOI 10.1029/2011JD016493
   Green TR, 2011, J HYDROL, V405, P532, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.002
   Grinsted A, 2004, NONLINEAR PROC GEOPH, V11, P561, DOI 10.5194/npg-11-561-2004
   Hanson RT, 2006, HYDROGEOL J, V14, P1122, DOI 10.1007/s10040-006-0067-7
   Hanson RT, 2004, J HYDROL, V287, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.10.006
   Hu W, 2016, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V20, P3183, DOI 10.5194/hess-20-3183-2016
   Hurkmans R, 2009, J HYDROMETEOROL, V10, P1257, DOI 10.1175/2009JHM1133.1
   Juanxiong H., 2004, J METEOROL RES-PRC, V19, P83
   Kariyeva J, 2012, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V162, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2012.08.006
   Klove B, 2014, J HYDROL, V518, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.037
   Kumar KN, 2016, CLIM DYNAM, V47, P2443, DOI 10.1007/s00382-016-2973-2
   Kuss AJM, 2014, J HYDROL, V519, P1939, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.069
   Lee T, 2013, INT J CLIMATOL, V33, P1015, DOI 10.1002/joc.3488
   Levine AFZ, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P3877, DOI 10.1002/2017GL072524
   Mathieu PP, 2004, J CLIMATE, V17, P1953, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<1953:POWCOT>2.0.CO;2
   McMahon PB, 2006, WATER RESOUR RES, V42, DOI 10.1029/2005WR004417
   Michel C, 2020, J CLIMATE, V33, P4871, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0730.1
   Mirzaei A, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11091835
   Mohammadrezaei M, 2020, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V140, P219, DOI 10.1007/s00704-019-03058-6
   Mohammed G., 2018, HYDROL CURRENT RES, V9, P303, DOI [10.4172/2157-7587.1000303, DOI 10.4172/2157-7587.1000303]
   Nazemosadat MJ, 2004, J CLIMATE, V17, P4005, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<4005:QTESIT>2.0.CO;2
   Nazemosadat MJ, 2015, AERUL SI APA COMPONE, P33, DOI [10.17378/AWC2015_05, DOI 10.17378/AWC2015_05]
   Newman M, 2003, J CLIMATE, V16, P3853, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<3853:EVOTPD>2.0.CO;2
   Newman M, 2016, J CLIMATE, V29, P4399, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0508.1
   Nikzad M., 2013, J IRAN WATER RES, V7, P175
   Notaro M, 2015, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V120, P10229, DOI 10.1002/2015JD023855
   Nouri M, 2020, METEOROL APPL, V27, DOI 10.1002/met.1899
   Panda DK, 2007, J HYDROL, V343, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.06.007
   Perez-Valdivia C, 2012, WATER RESOUR RES, V48, DOI 10.1029/2011WR010930
   Pour SH, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11082287
   Rajagopalan B, 1997, J CLIMATE, V10, P2351, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<2351:AEOAAV>2.0.CO;2
   Raziei T, 2009, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V23, P439, DOI 10.1007/s11269-008-9282-4
   Rezaei A, 2021, J HYDROL, V603, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126928
   Rezaei A, 2021, GROUNDWATER, V59, P236, DOI 10.1111/gwat.13034
   Rezaei A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V724, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138273
   Rezaei A, 2017, J AFR EARTH SCI, V134, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.06.029
   ROPELEWSKI CF, 1986, MON WEATHER REV, V114, P2352, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114<2352:NAPATP>2.0.CO;2
   Rust W, 2019, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V23, P3233, DOI 10.5194/hess-23-3233-2019
   Rust W, 2018, EARTH-SCI REV, V177, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.017
   Salahi B., 2005, U TEHRAN GEOGRAPHICA, V60, P156
   Scaife AA, 2010, IN ECMWF SEM PRED EU, P83
   Schulte JA, 2019, NONLINEAR PROC GEOPH, V26, P91, DOI 10.5194/npg-26-91-2019
   Sheffield J, 2008, J CLIMATE, V21, P432, DOI 10.1175/2007JCLI1822.1
   Sung MK, 2014, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V41, P4719, DOI 10.1002/2014GL060711
   Torrence C, 1998, B AM METEOROL SOC, V79, P61, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0061:APGTWA>2.0.CO;2
   Torrence C, 1999, J CLIMATE, V12, P2679, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<2679:ICITEM>2.0.CO;2
   Treidel H., 2012, Climate change effects on groundwater resources: a global synthesis of findings and recommendations
   Van Loon AF, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V119, P4640, DOI 10.1002/2013JD020383
   Van Loon AF, 2015, WIRES WATER, V2, P359, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1085
   Velasco EM, 2017, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V11, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.11.018
   Vicente-Serrano SM, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V116, DOI 10.1029/2011JD016039
   Walvoord MA, 2003, SCIENCE, V302, P1021, DOI 10.1126/science.1086435
   Wang SS, 2014, SCI REP-UK, V4, DOI 10.1038/srep06651
   Wyatt MG, 2012, CLIM DYNAM, V38, P929, DOI 10.1007/s00382-011-1071-8
   Yuan NM, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep27707
   Zhang WJ, 2019, CLIM DYNAM, V52, P257, DOI 10.1007/s00382-018-4135-1
   Zhang WJ, 2019, J CLIMATE, V32, P33, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0365.1
NR 76
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 11
PU SPRINGER WIEN
PI Vienna
PA Prinz-Eugen-Strasse 8-10, A-1040 Vienna, AUSTRIA
SN 0177-798X
EI 1434-4483
J9 THEOR APPL CLIMATOL
JI Theor. Appl. Climatol.
PD FEB
PY 2022
VL 147
IS 3-4
BP 1525
EP 1543
DI 10.1007/s00704-021-03920-6
EA JAN 2022
PG 19
WC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA ZB2ZY
UT WOS:000740381600001
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Tan, E
AF Tan, Ekim
TI Network of Games: An Ecology of Games Informing Integral and Inclusive
   City Developments
SO URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE city games; climate game; collaborative interfaces; integral planning;
   network of games; urban area development game
AB This article analyzes possibilities for connecting individual city games for building a network of games working together. City gaming works along with the understanding that cities are self-organizing systems, influenced by multiple bottom-up and top-down actors with varying interests and powers. Affordable housing, climate adaptation, or area development are examples of urgent urban challenges city games typically focus on. The assumption is that if these specialized games could be linked, then a large game infrastructure built as a modular system, can offer various game combinations responding to urban challenges in an integral and holistic way. To test a working game network, city games, models, and digital apps have been linked through their shared datasets as well as game interfaces. Two city experiments have been conducted in two Dutch cities-Amsterdam and Breda-which enabled the testing to function as "constructive design research." In Amsterdam (Klimaatspel) two separate city games were connected through their datasets, while in Breda (Play the Koepel) datasets and interfaces merged to create a new game. Used data models are the Energy Transition Model developed by Quintel and the urban plan cost simulator software of Urban Reality. Used game interfaces (digital and analog) include the Typeform, the Network of Games app, the Urban Reality simulator, and the Play the City table-top game format. The testing considered two different approaches for a potential game network. The first option assumes an all-encompassing digital app, reformatting and involving various games and models in a single interface. The second option is an open approach that looks to link custom-made games with existing interfaces. The second option allows both simultaneous and sequential linking. Two experiments utilizing sequential and simultaneous integration of diverse digital tools suggest that a collection of interfaces connecting to each other throughout the entire process from a digital poll to an app, a simulator or a webinar, or analog game sessions is more effective than a single mobile phone app for all potential game interactions. Considering city games as an ecology of city tools that can be linked to one another becomes through this study a concrete goal to reach. Through combining specialized games, addressing complex city challenges becomes possible. This step enables a more effective participation environment for diverse experts and non-experts.
C1 [Tan, Ekim] Play City Fdn, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
RP Tan, E (corresponding author), Play City Fdn, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
EM ekim@playthecity.eu
CR Alexander C., 1987, A new theory of urban design
   Alfasi N., 2007, PLAN THEOR, V6, P164
   Batty M., 2012, Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age
   Eizenberg E, 2019, PLAN THEOR, V18, P40, DOI 10.1177/1473095218764225
   Frampton K., 2007, Modern Architecture: A Critical History, VFourth
   Levy P., 1994, INTELLIGENCE COLLECT
   Portugali J, 1997, FUTURES, V29, P353, DOI 10.1016/S0016-3287(97)00022-0
   Portugali J., 2000, SELF ORG CITY
   Tan Ekim., 2014, Negotiation and Design for the Self-Organizing City: Gaming as a Method for Urban Design
   Tzonis A, 1975, DEV POPULIST MOVEME
NR 10
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 1
U2 10
PU COGITATIO PRESS
PI LISBON
PA RUA FIALHO ALMEIDA 14, 2 ESQ, LISBON, 1070-129, PORTUGAL
SN 2183-7635
J9 URBAN PLAN
JI Urban Plan.
PY 2022
VL 7
IS 2
BP 264
EP 277
DI 10.17645/up.v7i2.5136
PG 14
WC Urban Studies
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA 2R2ZD
UT WOS:000820979800006
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT B
AU Knoop, JM
   Bouwman, A
   Visser, H
AF Knoop, Joost M.
   Bouwman, Arno
   Visser, Hans
BE SchmidtThome, P
   Greiving, S
TI Sensitivity analyses of the ESPON Climate framework, on the basis of the
   case study on flooding in the Netherlands
SO EUROPEAN CLIMATE VULNERABILITIES AND ADAPTATION: A SPATIAL PLANNING
   PERSPECTIVE
LA English
DT Article; Book Chapter
ID SEA-LEVEL
AB The ESPON Climate framework could play an important role in the EU's intended shift towards an adaptive climate policy. However, uncertainties about future developments as well as uncertainties caused by choices made in the framework's construction will make this application not as straightforward as one would hope. Often politicians and policymakers in particular find it difficult to deal with this phenomenon. Therefore, it is the task of scientists to provide tailored information, among other things, about the range of uncertainties and how to deal with them as responsibly as possible. This process starts by gaining insight into the potential sources of uncertainty. In this context, we analysed the sensitivity of one of the aggregated indicators - the potential impact of climate change on the Dutch NUTS3 regions -to several choices made in the construction of the framework, on the basis of a case study on flooding in the Netherlands.
   The output of the framework was shown to be highly sensitive to the choice of flood map, hence to the choice of flood model used to calculate these maps. The basis of the framework development was the use of pan-European databases and models in order to avoid spatial differences due to variations in the quality of local information. The drawback of this approach is that very often more crude assumptions and simple models have to be used, such as two European-scale flood models (the DIVA coastal flood model and the LISFLOOD river flood model). A spatial comparison with calculated potential impacts, based on a more sophisticated Dutch flood modelling approach, showed a correlation of only 0.61, which became even less when results were classified (0.51-0.59, depending on the classification scheme used). The correlation was even worse (0.25) for the classes containing the estimated highest impacts. For the case of flooding in the Netherlands, the framework was not sensitive to choices with respect to the selection and weighting of the indicators reflecting the flood sensitivity, nor for the stage of normalisation in the framework. The choice of the risk concept (multiplicative or additive) had some impact, especially when the Dutch flood model was applied. This impact reduced to zero, however, if the results were classified according to an even distribution of the output instead of a classification based on equidistant classes. We also established a slight sensitivity of the output to extreme high-exposure values.
C1 [Knoop, Joost M.; Bouwman, Arno; Visser, Hans] PBL Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, NL-3721 MA Bilthoven, Netherlands.
RP Knoop, JM (corresponding author), PBL Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, A van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, NL-3721 MA Bilthoven, Netherlands.
CR [Anonymous], PANEUROPEAN RIVER CA
   [Anonymous], FLOOD PROTECTION NET
   [Anonymous], OVERSTROMINGSRISICOS
   [Anonymous], OECD WORLD FORUM KEY
   [Anonymous], NEDERLAND LATER TWEE
   Barredo J., 2008, ASSESSMENT COASTAL F
   Bindschadler R, 1998, SCIENCE, V282, P428, DOI 10.1126/science.282.5388.428
   Commission of the European Communities, 2009, IMP ASS COMM STAFF W
   Dankers R., 2009, J GEOPHYS RES, V114
   Dankers R, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V113, DOI 10.1029/2007JD009719
   De Bruijn KM, 2009, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V2, P58, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01022.x
   De Bruijn K. M., 2007, RISKY PLACES NETHERL
   Dessai S., 2007, UNCERTAINTY CLIMATE
   FLOODsite, 2005, LANG RISK PROJ DEF
   IRPUD, 2011, ESPON CLIM FIN REP
   Janssen PHM, 2005, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V52, P125, DOI 10.2166/wst.2005.0160
   Katsman CA, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P617, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0037-5
   Klingen L., 2011, H2O, V22, P14
   KNMI, 2006, KLIM 21E EEUW VIER S
   Kolen B., 2006, ALS TOCH MISGAAT OVE
   Kopp RE, 2009, NATURE, V462, P863, DOI 10.1038/nature08686
   Ligtvoet W., 2009, ROADMAP CLIMATE PROO
   Marchand M, 2009, MODELLING COASTAL VU
   Noordhoff Atlas productions, 2012, WAT ATL NETH
   Rohling EJ, 2008, NAT GEOSCI, V1, P38, DOI 10.1038/ngeo.2007.28
   Sterl A, 2009, OCEAN SCI, V5, P369, DOI 10.5194/os-5-369-2009
   Swart R, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V92, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9444-7
   ten Brinke W, 2008, P I CIVIL ENG-WAT M, V161, P181, DOI 10.1680/wama.2008.161.4.181
   V&W, 2005, VEIL NED KAART HOOFD
   [V&W VROM and LNV Ministerie van Landbouw Natuur en Voedsel], 2009, MIN VERK WAT MVV RUI
   Veijalainen N, 2010, J HYDROL, V391, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.035
   VNK, 2005, VEIL NED KAART HOOFD
   Wardekker JA, 2009, TOOL CATALOGUE FRAME
   WOUTERS K, 2005, VEILIGHEID NEDERLAND
NR 34
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU BLACKWELL SCIENCE PUBL
PI OXFORD
PA OSNEY MEAD, OXFORD OX2 0EL, ENGLAND
BN 978-0-470-97741-5
PY 2013
BP 253
EP 271
D2 10.1002/9781118474822
PG 19
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies
WE Book Citation Index – Social Sciences & Humanities (BKCI-SSH); Book Citation Index – Science (BKCI-S)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA BA1JJ
UT WOS:000332642900014
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Crase, L
   Connor, J
   Michaels, S
   Cooper, B
AF Crase, Lin
   Connor, Jeff
   Michaels, Sarah
   Cooper, Bethany
TI Australian water policy reform: lessons learned and potential
   transferability
SO CLIMATE POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE water policy; drought policy; flood policy; adaptation; policy transfer
ID MURRAY-DARLING BASIN; DROUGHT; CLIMATE; RECOMMENDATIONS; BUYBACKS;
   MARKETS; MODEL
AB This article sharpens consideration of aspects of policy transfer to address climate change and gives greater attention to the context that might support efficient adaptive resilience. Using the example of Australian reforms to water policy, we evaluate how different elements of policy proved more (less) successful in facilitating efficient adaptation to climate variability and thus expose elements that might be more (less) attractive as candidates for policy transfer. Overall, we find that Australian policy reforms in the water sector provide useful guidance in some instances and not others. Establishing caps on extraction, flexible water markets and individual carry over rights generally facilitated flexible and efficient adaptation, and could be transferred. Related policy concepts, like formulating clear water planning rules and entitlements, are worth considering for implementation elsewhere, even if the groundwork on governance is a prerequisite. We also note the importance of shaping drought responses from government in such a way as not to distort the incentives for individual adaptation, and there is some evidence of this working in the Australian setting. Achieving transferability of these policies, however, may be a challenge. Australian policies around 'hard infrastructure' investments have generally proved less desirable and ideally should not be considered as a roadmap. These relate specifically to: (1) extravagant augmentation of urban supply; (2) using infrastructure to supposedly improve irrigation efficiency for environmental water provision; and (3) governments' infrastructure responses after flooding. None of these approaches is consistent with the aim of fostering adaptation to a more variable climatic future. Key policy insights
   Australian water policies that have focussed on capping water extractions, development of flexible markets and specifying rights to allow greater flexibility have generally worked well against a changing climate, and could be transferred. The development of clear planning rules and entitlements also proved important, although the conditions to favour transfer are difficult to engender. Policies dealing with hard physical infrastructure have proven problematic and their adoption elsewhere is discouraged, even if transfer is more amenable. Encouraging more individual adaptation to flooding is a particularly significant challenge, even in a country renowned for drought.
C1 [Crase, Lin; Connor, Jeff; Cooper, Bethany] Univ South Australia, UniSA Business, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
   [Michaels, Sarah] Univ Nebraska, Dept Polit Sci, Lincoln, NE USA.
C3 University of South Australia; University of Nebraska System; University
   of Nebraska Lincoln
RP Crase, L (corresponding author), Univ South Australia, UniSA Business, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
EM lin.crase@unisa.edu.au
RI Connor, Jeff/T-7345-2019; Cooper, Bethany/E-5425-2016; Connor,
   Jeffery/G-5466-2010; Crase, Lin/L-2072-2016
OI Cooper, Bethany/0000-0002-7484-1772; Connor,
   Jeffery/0000-0002-2313-8630; Crase, Lin/0000-0002-3615-7152
CR Adamson D, 2018, AUST J AGR RESOUR EC, V62, P83, DOI 10.1111/1467-8489.12231
   [Anonymous], 2016, Managing Water for the Environment during Drought: Lessons from Victoria, Australia
   [Anonymous], 2012, IMP WAT TRAD SO MURR
   Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2004, IMP DROUGHT AUSTR PR
   Australian Water Association, DES FACT SHEET
   Australian Water Partnership, 2019, AWP
   Banerjee O, 2013, ECOL ECON, V91, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.03.022
   BOM (Bureau of Meteorology) , 2017, CLIM RES WAT SOURC
   Chalkley-Rhoden, 2017, ABC NEWS
   Chief Scientist of Queensland, 2011, UND FLOODS QUEST ANS
   Cooper B, 2012, AUST J AGR RESOUR EC, V56, P61, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2011.00573.x
   Crase L, 2004, WATER RESOUR RES, V40, DOI 10.1029/2003WR002786
   Crase L., 2019, CONVERSATION
   Crase L, 2011, ECON PAP, V30, P135, DOI 10.1111/j.1759-3441.2011.00102.x
   Crase Lin., 2008, Water Policy in Australia: The Impact of Change and Uncertainty
   Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, 2016, HIST AUSTR WAT MARK
   Dolowitz D, 1996, POLIT STUD-LONDON, V44, P343, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x
   Dreverman D.:., 2013, Drought in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions: A Multi-Disciplinary and Cross-Country Perspective, P425
   Hallegatte S, 2008, RISK ANAL, V28, P779, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01046.x
   Hering D, 2010, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V408, P4007, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.031
   Hughes N., 2009, AUSTR COMMODITIES, V16, P1
   IPA, 2017, INN POV ACT WWW DOC
   Kendall M., 2013, DROUGHT ARID SEMIARI, P451
   Kingwell RS, 2017, AUST J AGR RESOUR EC, V61, P344, DOI 10.1111/1467-8489.12195
   Loch A, 2014, LAND USE POLICY, V36, P396, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.007
   Meza FJ, 2008, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V47, P1269, DOI 10.1175/2007JAMC1540.1
   Milly PCD, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P573, DOI 10.1126/science.1151915
   Minkman E, 2018, POLICY STUD-UK, V39, P222, DOI 10.1080/01442872.2018.1451503
   National Climate Centre Bureau of Meteorology, 2012, AUSTR WETT 2 YEAR PE
   Nowak R, 2007, NEW SCI, V194, P8, DOI 10.1016/S0262-4079(07)61467-5
   Organisation for Economic Co operation and Development, 2015, WAT RES ALL SHAR RIS
   Overton I, 2013, DROUGHT ARID SEMIARI, P217
   Perry C, 2007, IRRIG DRAIN, V56, P367, DOI 10.1002/ird.323
   Porter M. G., 2013, TALE 2 CITIES DESALI
   Productivity Commission, 2011, AUSTR UR WAT SECT
   Productivity Commission, 2014, NAT DIS FUND ARR
   Quiggin J, 2001, AUST J AGR RESOUR EC, V45, P67, DOI 10.1111/1467-8489.00134
   Qureshi ME, 2010, WATER RESOUR RES, V46, DOI 10.1029/2008WR007445
   Simms D., 2013, AUSTR EXPERIENCE DRI
   Singh-Peterson L, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P755, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1871-y
   Stone D., 1999, Politics, V19, P51
   The Adelaide Advertiser, 2013, ADELAIDE ADVERTISER
   van Dijk AIJM, 2013, WATER RESOUR RES, V49, P1040, DOI 10.1002/wrcr.20123
   Wheeler S, 2014, J HYDROL, V518, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.019
   Wheeler SA, 2017, J HYDROL, V552, P807, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.010
   Wilhite DA, 2014, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V3, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2014.01.002
   Wittwer G, 2011, ECON PAP, V30, P289, DOI 10.1111/j.1759-3441.2011.00122.x
   Wittwer G, 2013, AUST J AGR RESOUR EC, V57, P399, DOI 10.1111/1467-8489.12001
   Zhu R, 2011, PARASITE VECTOR, V4, DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-4-43
NR 49
TC 12
Z9 12
U1 2
U2 25
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1469-3062
EI 1752-7457
J9 CLIM POLICY
JI Clim. Policy
PD MAY 27
PY 2020
VL 20
IS 5
BP 641
EP 651
DI 10.1080/14693062.2020.1752614
EA APR 2020
PG 11
WC Environmental Studies; Public Administration
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public Administration
GA LU7DK
UT WOS:000527592700001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Dobson, R
   Willis, SG
   Jennings, S
   Cheke, RA
   Challinor, AJ
   Dallimer, M
AF Dobson, Rachel
   Willis, Stephen G.
   Jennings, Stewart
   Cheke, Robert A.
   Challinor, Andrew J.
   Dallimer, Martin
TI Near-Term Forecasting of Terrestrial Mobile Species Distributions for
   Adaptive Management Under Extreme Weather Events
SO GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE climate adaptation strategies; climate change; dynamic species
   management; extreme weather events; near-term forecasting;
   <italic>Quelea quelea</italic>; red-billed quelea; seasonal forecasting;
   species distribution modelling
ID QUELEA QUELEA-QUELEA; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CONSERVATION; DROUGHT; MODELS;
   PREDICTION; MIGRATION; ABUNDANCE; IMPACTS; HABITAT
AB Across the globe, mobile species are key components of ecosystems. Migratory birds and nomadic antelope can have considerable conservation, economic or societal value, while irruptive insects can be major pests and threaten food security. Extreme weather events, which are increasing in frequency and intensity under ongoing climate change, are driving rapid and unforeseen shifts in mobile species distributions. This challenges their management, potentially leading to population declines, or exacerbating the adverse impacts of pests. Near-term, within-year forecasting may have the potential to anticipate mobile species distribution changes during extreme weather events, thus informing adaptive management strategies. Here, for the first time, we assess the robustness of near-term forecasting of the distribution of a terrestrial species under extreme weather. For this, we generated near-term (2 weeks to 7 months ahead) distribution forecasts for a crop pest that is a threat to food security in southern Africa, the red-billed quelea Quelea quelea. To assess performance, we generated hindcasts of the species distribution across 13 years (2004-2016) that encompassed two major droughts. We show that, using dynamic species distribution models (D-SDMs), environmental suitability for quelea can be accurately forecast with seasonal lead times (up to 7 months ahead), at high resolution, and across a large spatial scale, including in extreme drought conditions. D-SDM predictive accuracy and near-term hindcast reliability were primarily driven by the availability of training data rather than overarching weather conditions. We discuss how a forecasting system could be used to inform adaptive management of mobile species and mitigate impacts of extreme weather, including by anticipating sites and times for transient management and proactively mobilising resources for prepared responses. Our results suggest that such techniques could be widely applied to inform more resilient, adaptive management of mobile species worldwide.
C1 [Dobson, Rachel] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Sustainabil Res Inst, Leeds, England.
   [Dobson, Rachel; Willis, Stephen G.] Univ Durham, Dept Biosci, Conservat Ecol Grp, Durham, England.
   [Jennings, Stewart; Challinor, Andrew J.] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Inst Climate & Atmospher Sci, Leeds, England.
   [Cheke, Robert A.] Univ Greenwich, Nat Resources Inst, Chatham, Kent, England.
   [Dallimer, Martin] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Environm Policy, London, England.
C3 University of Leeds; Durham University; University of Leeds; University
   of Greenwich; Imperial College London
RP Dobson, R (corresponding author), Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Sustainabil Res Inst, Leeds, England.; Dobson, R (corresponding author), Univ Durham, Dept Biosci, Conservat Ecol Grp, Durham, England.
EM eerdo@leeds.ac.uk
RI Willis, Stephen/F-8503-2015
FU Leeds- York- Hull Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Doctoral
   Training Partnership (DTP) Panorama [NE/S007458/1]; Biotechnology and
   Biological Sciences Research Council through UK Research and Innovation
   as part of the Global Challenges Research Fund, AFRICAP program
   [BB/P027784/1]
FX This research was supported by the Leeds- York- Hull Natural Environment
   Research Council (NERC) Doctoral Training Partnership (DTP) Panorama
   (NE/S007458/1) and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research
   Council through UK Research and Innovation as part of the Global
   Challenges Research Fund, AFRICAP program (BB/P027784/1).
CR Alerstam T, 2003, OIKOS, V103, P247, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12559.x
   Auer T., 2022, EODeBird Observation Dataset
   Bagchi R, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P1236, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12123
   Barlow DR, 2021, J APPL ECOL, V58, P2493, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.13992
   Barnes CL, 2022, ECOGRAPHY, V2022, DOI 10.1111/ecog.06189
   Bateman BL, 2012, ECOGRAPHY, V35, P306, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06871.x
   Bedia J, 2020, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V13, P1711, DOI 10.5194/gmd-13-1711-2020
   Beguera S., 2023, SPEIbase v. 2.9 Dataset.
   Beguería S, 2014, INT J CLIMATOL, V34, P3001, DOI 10.1002/joc.3887
   BirdLife International, 2021, HDB BIRDS WORLD
   Boas T, 2023, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V27, P3143, DOI [10.5194/hess-27-3143-2023, 10.5194/hess-27-3143-2023,2023]
   Boult VL, 2023, CONSERV BIOL, V37, DOI 10.1111/cobi.14054
   Breiman Leo, 2001, RANDOM FORESTS, V45
   Brodie S, 2023, NAT COMMUN, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-43188-0
   Brodie S, 2017, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V140, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2017.03.004
   Bull JW, 2013, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V11, P203, DOI 10.1890/120020
   Burke RA, 2019, DIVERS DISTRIB, V25, P1399, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12950
   Cannon AJ, 2015, J CLIMATE, V28, P6938, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00754.1
   Cheke RA, 2007, J APPL ECOL, V44, P523, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01295.x
   Cheke RA, 2019, CROP PROT, V116, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.cropro.2018.10.005
   Chevuturi A, 2021, CLIM DYNAM, V56, P2941, DOI 10.1007/s00382-020-05624-5
   Clark NE, 2022, PLOS COMPUT BIOL, V18, DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009874
   Copernicus Climate Change Service, 2018, ECMWR, DOI 10.24381/CDS.181D637E
   Craig A. J. F., 2020, Birds of the World, DOI [10.2173/bow.rebque1.01, DOI 10.2173/BOW.REBQUE1.01]
   Dean WRJ, 2009, S AFR J SCI, V105, P24, DOI 10.1590/s0038-23532009000100016
   Didan K., 2021, MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day L3 Global 250m SIN Grid V061 [Data set], DOI [10.5067/MODIS/MOD13Q1.061, DOI 10.5067/MODIS/MOD13Q1.061]
   Dietze MC, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P1424, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1710231115
   Diez JM, 2012, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V10, P249, DOI 10.1890/110137
   Doblas-Reyes FJ, 2013, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V4, P245, DOI 10.1002/wcc.217
   Dobson R, 2023, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V14, P1190, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.14101
   Dunn DC, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P668, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1513626113
   Elith J, 2008, J ANIM ECOL, V77, P802, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x
   Elith J, 2010, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V1, P330, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00036.x
   ELLIOTT CCH, 1990, IBIS, V132, P232, DOI 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1990.tb01041.x
   Eveson JP, 2015, FISH RES, V170, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2015.05.008
   Friedl M., 2019, MCD12Q2 MODIS/Terra+Aqua Land Cover Dynamics Yearly L3 Global 500m SIN Grid V006
   GENTILLI J, 1983, J BIOGEOGR, V10, P75, DOI 10.2307/2844621
   Guisan A, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P993, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x
   Haines A, 2006, LANCET, V367, P2101, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68933-2, 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.01.002]
   Hersbach H, 2020, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V146, P1999, DOI 10.1002/qj.3803
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   Hobday AJ, 2016, FISH OCEANOGR, V25, P45, DOI 10.1111/fog.12083
   Howard C, 2014, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V5, P506, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12184
   Hudson D, 2013, MON WEATHER REV, V141, P4429, DOI 10.1175/MWR-D-13-00059.1
   Jaeger M.M., 1989, P181
   JAEGER MM, 1979, AUK, V96, P516
   Johnson SJ, 2019, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V12, P1087, DOI 10.5194/gmd-12-1087-2019
   Jones P.J., 1989, P132
   Jones P. J., 1989, Quelea quelea: Africa's bird pest
   Jonzén N, 2011, ANIMAL MIGRATION: A SYNTHESIS, P91
   Karger D.N., 2022, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, P1, DOI [10.5194/essd-2022-367, DOI 10.5194/ESSD-2022-367]
   Kass JM, 2020, ECOGRAPHY, V43, P341, DOI 10.1111/ecog.04886
   Kell LT, 2016, FISH RES, V183, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.05.017
   Kleiven EF, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-33443-6
   Knox J, 2012, ENVIRON RES LETT, V7, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034032
   LAM NSN, 1983, AM CARTOGRAPHER, V10, P129, DOI 10.1559/152304083783914958
   López-Hoffman L, 2017, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V42, P509, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090119
   Malick MJ, 2020, FRONT MAR SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2020.578490
   Maraun D., 2017, Statistical downscaling and bias correction for climate research. Statistical downscaling and bias correction for climate research, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781107588783
   Maxwell SL, 2019, DIVERS DISTRIB, V25, P613, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12878
   McKechnie AE, 2012, EMU, V112, pI, DOI 10.1071/MUv112n2_ED
   MCKEE TB, 1993, P 8 C APPL CLIM AN C
   Mcwilliam AN, 2004, ENVIRON CONSERV, V31, P130, DOI 10.1017/S0376892904001213
   Milanesi P, 2020, ECOL EVOL, V10, P1087, DOI 10.1002/ece3.5938
   Muhling BA, 2020, FRONT MAR SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2020.00589
   Murali G, 2023, NATURE, V615, P461, DOI 10.1038/s41586-022-05606-z
   Nakagawa S, 2008, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V23, P592, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.014
   Nandintsetseg D, 2019, J APPL ECOL, V56, P1916, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.13380
   Niang I, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1199
   O'Kane C., 2024, Continental Europe Has New Hottest Day on Record at Nearly 120F in Sicily.
   Poynting M., 2024, Amazon's Record Drought Driven by Climate Change.
   Prugh LR, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P819, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0255-1
   Reddy S, 2003, J BIOGEOGR, V30, P1719, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00946.x
   Reynolds MD, 2017, SCI ADV, V3, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1700707
   Roberts DR, 2017, ECOGRAPHY, V40, P913, DOI 10.1111/ecog.02881
   Rodenburg J, 2014, CROP PROT, V66, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.cropro.2014.08.015
   Rosqvist GC, 2022, AMBIO, V51, P1247, DOI 10.1007/s13280-021-01655-2
   Runge Claire, 2017, Australian Zoologist, V39, P280, DOI 10.7882/AZ.2016.003
   Runge CA, 2015, CONSERV BIOL, V29, P865, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12440
   Runge CA, 2014, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V12, P395, DOI 10.1890/130237
   Seneviratne S. I., 2021, Climate Change 2021-The Physical Science Basis, P1513, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781009157896.013, 10.1017/9781009157896.013]
   Slingo JM, 2005, PHILOS T R SOC B, V360, P1983, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2005.1755
   Sutherst RW, 2011, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V2, P220, DOI 10.1002/wcc.102
   Teitelbaum CS, 2019, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V34, P569, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2019.02.005
   Thuiller W, 2024, biomod2: Ensemble Platform for Species Distribution Modeling
   Tottrup AP, 2012, SCIENCE, V338, P1307, DOI 10.1126/science.1227548
   Tulloch AIT, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P5816, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15272
   Ummenhofer CC, 2017, PHILOS T R SOC B, V372, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2016.0135
   VanDerWal J, 2009, AM NAT, V174, P282, DOI 10.1086/600087
   VanDerWal J, 2009, ECOL MODEL, V220, P589, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.11.010
   Visser ME, 2008, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V275, P649, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2007.0997
   Walsh JC, 2020, ECOLOGY, V101, DOI 10.1002/ecy.3060
   WARD P, 1971, IBIS, V113, P275, DOI 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1971.tb05158.x
   Weber MM, 2017, ECOGRAPHY, V40, P817, DOI 10.1111/ecog.02125
   White EP, 2019, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V10, P332, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.13104
   Wiley James W., 1993, Bird Conservation International, V3, P319
   Woelmer WM, 2022, ECOL APPL, V32, DOI 10.1002/eap.2642
   Zhang L, 2019, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V64, P15, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ento-011118-112500
   Zimmermann NE, 2010, ECOGRAPHY, V33, P985, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06953.x
NR 99
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 7
U2 7
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1354-1013
EI 1365-2486
J9 GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL
JI Glob. Change Biol.
PD NOV
PY 2024
VL 30
IS 11
AR e17579
DI 10.1111/gcb.17579
PG 17
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA O1R9G
UT WOS:001368995000001
PM 39548694
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wakjira, MT
   Peleg, N
   Six, J
   Molnar, P
AF Wakjira, Mosisa Tujuba
   Peleg, Nadav
   Six, Johan
   Molnar, Peter
TI Current and future cropland suitability for cereal production across the
   rainfed agricultural landscapes of Ethiopia
SO AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Agroecology; Cereal crops; Climate change; CMIP6; Rainfed agriculture;
   Cropland suitability
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; SOIL PROPERTIES; FOOD SECURITY; DROUGHT RISK; MAIZE
   YIELD; ADAPTATION; IMPACTS; STRATEGIES; MODEL; FARMERS
AB One of the major challenges posed by climate change in agriculture is the alteration in cropland suitability. This alteration has serious consequences for food security and economic stability at global, regional, and local scales, especially in smallholder and rainfed agricultural systems like in Ethiopia. A comprehensive understanding of the current state of croplands and future changes under warming temperatures and increasing rainfall uncertainty is critical for national climate adaptation planning. Here, we evaluated cropland suitability (CLS) for four major cereal crops (teff, maize, sorghum, and wheat), under both current and future climates across the rainfed agriculture (RFA) landscapes of Ethiopia. We utilized a novel suitability modelling approach that establishes functional relationships between crop yield, and climatic factors (rainfall, temperature, and solar radiation) and soil factors (texture, pH, and organic carbon). Furthermore, we analyzed the relative influences of the growing season rainfall and temperature on the changes in CLS. The results show that 54 % of the RFA area has a suitability index of 0.6 or higher (moderately to highly suitable) for teff and that 51 %, 63 %, and 29 % of the grid cells are suitable for maize, sorghum, and wheat crops, respectively. The suitable agroecologies of the four crops will likely undergo altitudinal shifts and areal contraction, with magnitudes of the changes depending on the emission scenarios. Under the SSP2-4.5, the suitable areas are projected to decrease by 25 % for teff, 7 % for maize, 10 % for sorghum, and 16 % for wheat in the 2080s. In semi-arid and hyper-humid climates, CLS is sensitive to changes in the growing season rainfall, whereas in low and high elevation regions, it is temperature- sensitive. In light of our results, we argue that adaptation actions tailored to agroecological conditions and topographic locations are vitally necessary to mitigate the long-term impacts of climate change on Ethiopia's rainfed agriculture.
C1 [Wakjira, Mosisa Tujuba; Molnar, Peter] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Engn, Laura Hezner Weg 7, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
   [Peleg, Nadav] Univ Lausanne, Inst Earth Surface Dynam, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
   [Peleg, Nadav] Univ Lausanne, Expertise Ctr Climate Extremes, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
   [Six, Johan] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Environm Syst Sci, Univ Str 2, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
C3 Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology Domain; ETH Zurich; University of
   Lausanne; University of Lausanne; Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology
   Domain; ETH Zurich
RP Wakjira, MT (corresponding author), Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Engn, Laura Hezner Weg 7, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
EM wakjira@ifu.baug.ethz.ch
RI six, johan/J-5228-2015; Wakjira, Mosisa Tujuba/HJB-3484-2022; Peleg,
   Nadav/Q-9719-2016
OI Wakjira, Mosisa Tujuba/0000-0003-4929-5631; Peleg,
   Nadav/0000-0001-6863-2934
FU Engineering for Development E4D Doctoral Scholarship Program of ETH for
   Development (ETH4D) , ETH Zurich by the Sawiris Foundation for Social
   Development
FX This research is funded by the Engineering for Development E4D Doctoral
   Scholarship Program of ETH for Development (ETH4D) , ETH Zurich, which
   is funded by the Sawiris Foundation for Social Development.
CR Abera N, 2019, ENVIRON SOCIO-ECON S, V7, P1, DOI 10.2478/environ-2019-0019
   Adhikari U, 2015, FOOD ENERGY SECUR, V4, P110, DOI 10.1002/fes3.61
   Adimassu Z, 2014, ENVIRON DEV, V11, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2014.04.004
   Akpoti K, 2022, AGR SYST, V200, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103429
   Akpoti K, 2019, AGR SYST, V173, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.02.013
   Alemayehu N., 2020, Handbook of Climate Change Resilience, P1169, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-93336-8_120, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-93336-8_120]
   Alemu WG, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14071723
   Ali A., 2022, EGUsphere, P1, DOI [10.5194/egusphere-2022-301, DOI 10.5194/EGUSPHERE-2022-301]
   Amede T., 2017, A farming system framework for investment planning and priority setting in Ethiopia. ACIAR Technical Reports Series No. 90
   Anandhi A, 2011, WATER RESOUR RES, V47, DOI 10.1029/2010WR009104
   Bekele A, 2014, Projecting Ethiopian demographics from 2012-2050 using the spectrum suite of models
   Bezabih A., 2020, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., V300, DOI [10.1016/j.agee.2020.107020, DOI 10.1016/J.AGEE.2020.107020]
   Bhatt A, 2023, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V19, P547, DOI 10.1002/ieam.4701
   Blanchet G, 2016, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V230, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2016.05.032
   Brusca RC, 2013, ECOL EVOL, V3, P3307, DOI 10.1002/ece3.720
   Burke MB, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.04.003
   Burrough P.A., 1992, Fuzzy classification methods for determining land suitability from soil profile observations and topography, P193
   Carrao H, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V39, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.012
   Castro-Llanos F, 2019, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V24, P1401, DOI 10.1007/s11027-019-09852-x
   Chemura A, 2024, SCI DATA, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41597-024-03118-1
   Chere Z, 2022, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V8, P4539, DOI 10.1007/s40808-022-01439-x
   Conway D, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.013
   CSA, 2010, Agricultural Sample Survey (2010/2011): Report on Area and Production of Crops
   CSA, 2007, Summary and Statistical Report of the 2007 Population and Housing Census
   de Berg M., 2008, Computational Geometry, DOI [10.1007/978-3-540-77974-2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-77974-2]
   De Souza K, 2015, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V15, P747, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0755-8
   Delelegn YT, 2018, BMC ECOL, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12898-018-0214-8
   Dendir Z, 2021, CLIM SERV, V22, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100236
   Destaw F, 2022, AGR RES, V11, P539, DOI 10.1007/s40003-021-00573-9
   Eshete G., 2020, Ethiop. Clim. -smart Agric. Roadmap
   Evangelista P, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V119, P855, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0776-6
   Eze E, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-09862-x
   FAO, 2022, Crops and Climate Change Impact briefs. Climate-smart agriculture For More sustainable, resilient, and Equitable Food Systems, DOI [10.4060/cb8030-n, DOI 10.4060/CB8030-N]
   FAOSTAT, 2018, Land Use Indicators
   Fawcett T, 2006, PATTERN RECOGN LETT, V27, P861, DOI 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010
   Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, 2019, ETH CLIM RES GREEN E
   Fischer G., 2008, Global Agro-ecological Zones Assessment for Agriculture (GAEZ 2008), P10
   Flückiger S, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7246
   Funk C, 2015, SCI DATA, V2, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2015.66
   Gebrelibanos T, 2014, AFR J ECOL, V52, P292, DOI 10.1111/aje.12118
   Gebresamuel G, 2022, J CROP IMPROV, V36, P169, DOI 10.1080/15427528.2021.1931608
   Gidey E., 2023, Northern Ethiopian Highlands, P1
   Global Hunger Index (GHI), 2022, Global Hunger Index
   Godfray HCJ, 2010, SCIENCE, V327, P812, DOI 10.1126/science.1185383
   Goodman L.A., 1960, On the exact variance of products, V55, P708, DOI DOI 10.1080/01621459.1960.10483369
   Grossi A, 2022, FRONT CLIM, V4, DOI 10.3389/fclim.2022.931514
   Hailu G, 2017, EUR J DEV RES, V29, P866, DOI 10.1057/s41287-016-0065-0
   HAMBY DM, 1994, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V32, P135, DOI 10.1007/BF00547132
   Hameso S, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P347, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1291408
   Hassan MA, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2021.676884
   Hatfield JL, 2019, FRONT PLANT SCI, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2019.00103
   Hatfield JL, 2015, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V10, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001
   Hengl T, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0169748
   Holzkämper A, 2013, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V168, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.004
   Huang JY, 2020, EARTH-SCI REV, V208, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103295
   Hurni H., 1998, Res. Report, P43
   Hurni H., 2016, Soil and Water Conservation in Ethiopia: Guidelines for Development Agents, V2nd, P134, DOI [10.7892/boris.80013, DOI 10.7892/BORIS.80013]
   Hussain HA, 2018, FRONT PLANT SCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00393
   Jarvis R. A., 1973, Information Processing Letters, V2, P18, DOI 10.1016/0020-0190(73)90020-3
   Jorgensen M, 2020, J AGRON CROP SCI, V206, P242, DOI 10.1111/jac.12385
   Kang YH, 2009, PROG NAT SCI-MATER, V19, P1665, DOI 10.1016/j.pnsc.2009.08.001
   Karger DN, 2020, SCI DATA, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41597-020-00587-y
   Kassawmar T, 2018, HELIYON, V4, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00914
   Kaur G, 2020, AGRON J, V112, P1475, DOI 10.1002/agj2.20093
   Knoop L., 2012, Securing Water and Land in the Tana Basin
   Kummu M, 2021, ONE EARTH, V4, P720, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.017
   Lala J, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abf9c9
   Lasco RD, 2014, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V5, P825, DOI 10.1002/wcc.301
   Lee H., 2018, The Open Agriculture Journal, V12, P185, DOI DOI 10.2174/1874331501812010185
   Lehmann J, 2015, NATURE, V528, P60, DOI 10.1038/nature16069
   Lesk C, 2022, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V3, P872, DOI 10.1038/s43017-022-00368-8
   Lobell DB, 2009, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V34, P179, DOI 10.1146/annurev.environ.041008.093740
   Lobell DB, 2008, ENVIRON RES LETT, V3, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/3/3/034007
   Manik SMN, 2019, FRONT PLANT SCI, V10, DOI [10.3389/fpls.2019.00140, 10.3389/fneur.2019.00784]
   Marlet S, 1998, ARID SOIL RES REHAB, V12, P139, DOI 10.1080/15324989809381504
   Megabia TT, 2022, ENVIRON SYST RES, V11, DOI 10.1186/s40068-022-00270-8
   Meinshausen M, 2020, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V13, P3571, DOI 10.5194/gmd-13-3571-2020
   Mera GA, 2018, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V22, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2018.10.002
   Meza I, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P695, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-695-2020
   Moges DM, 2018, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V29, P3317, DOI 10.1002/ldr.3091
   Mohamed A.A., 2017, INT J HLTH EC POLICY, V2, P86, DOI [10.11648/j.hep.20170203.11, DOI 10.11648/J.HEP.20170203.11]
   Moroda GT, 2018, ENVIRON DEV, V27, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2018.07.005
   Msimbira LA, 2020, FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S, V4, DOI 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00106
   MUCHOW RC, 1990, AGRON J, V82, P338, DOI 10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200020033x
   Muñoz-Sabater J, 2021, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V13, P4349, DOI 10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021
   Navarro-Racines C, 2020, SCI DATA, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41597-019-0343-8
   NBE, 2021, National Bank of Ethiopia Annual Bulletin
   O'Neill BC, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P3461, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016
   Palmer PI, 2023, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V4, P254, DOI 10.1038/s43017-023-00397-x
   Pan JW, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2020.627331
   Pecl GT, 2017, SCIENCE, V355, DOI 10.1126/science.aai9214
   Peng WX, 2020, ENVIRON RES, V191, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110046
   Philip S, 2018, J CLIMATE, V31, P2465, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0274.1
   Phillips SJ, 2004, P 21 INT C MACH LEAR, P655, DOI DOI 10.1145/1015330.1015412
   Poggio L, 2021, SOIL-GERMANY, V7, P217, DOI 10.5194/soil-7-217-2021
   Ramankutty N, 2002, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V11, P377, DOI 10.1046/j.1466-822x.2002.00294.x
   Ramirez-Cabral NYZ, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-05804-0
   Ramirez-Villegas J, 2013, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V170, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.09.005
   Rawls WJ, 2003, GEODERMA, V116, P61, DOI 10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00094-6
   Rezaei EE, 2015, EUR J AGRON, V64, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2014.10.003
   Rockström J, 2010, AGR WATER MANAGE, V97, P543, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.09.009
   Rosenzweig C, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3268, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1222463110
   Schlenker W, 2010, ENVIRON RES LETT, V5, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014010
   Schmidhuber J, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P19703, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701976104
   Schneider JM, 2022, SCI DATA, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41597-022-01632-8
   Shukla R, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abdb5c
   Sloat LL, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-15076-4
   Studer Christoph, 2021, The sustainable intensification of smallholder farming systems, P67, DOI 10.19103/AS.2020.0080.09
   Studer R., 2013, Water Harvesting: Guidelines to Good Practice
   Suhairi T. A. S. T. M., 2018, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V169, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/169/1/012044
   Sultan B, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-49167-0
   Sutherst RW, 2003, J BIOGEOGR, V30, P805, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00861.x
   Tadele E, 2022, COGENT ECON FINANC, V10, DOI 10.1080/23322039.2021.2020484
   Taffesse A.S., 2012, research note 11
   Taye MA, 2021, HELIYON, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07454
   Tesfahunegn GB, 2021, GEOJOURNAL, V86, P417, DOI 10.1007/s10708-019-10077-3
   Teshome H., 2021, Smallholder Farmers ' Perceptions of Climate Change and Adaptation Practices For Maize Production in Eastern Ethiopia, P1
   Tessema I, 2021, GEOJOURNAL, V86, P1767, DOI 10.1007/s10708-020-10159-7
   Tessema YA, 2019, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V11, P358, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-05-2018-0043
   Teutschbein C, 2012, J HYDROL, V456, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.052
   Tilman D, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P20260, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1116437108
   van Dijk M, 2020, AGR SYST, V183, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102828
   van Etten J, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P4194, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1813720116
   van Ittersum MK, 2013, FIELD CROP RES, V143, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.009
   Viste E, 2013, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V112, P535, DOI 10.1007/s00704-012-0746-3
   Wakjira M.T., 2022, Bias-corrected and downscaled ERA5-Land2-m air temperature dataset for Ethiopia for the period 1981-2010, DOI [10.3929/ethz-b-000546574, DOI 10.3929/ETHZ-B-000546574]
   Wakjira MT, 2023, DATA BRIEF, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108844
   Wakjira MT, 2021, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V310, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108633
   Wheeler T, 2013, SCIENCE, V341, P508, DOI 10.1126/science.1239402
   Wu W, 2022, CROP ENVIRON, V1, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.crope.2022.05.005
   Zabel F, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0107522
   Zeleke G, 2023, ENVIRON SUSTAIN IND, V17, DOI 10.1016/j.indic.2022.100220
   Zewudie DK, 2021, PEERJ, V9, DOI 10.7717/peerj.10965
   ,, 1976, FAO Soils Bulletin
NR 134
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 3
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0168-1923
EI 1873-2240
J9 AGR FOREST METEOROL
JI Agric. For. Meteorol.
PD NOV 15
PY 2024
VL 358
AR 110262
DI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110262
EA OCT 2024
PG 19
WC Agronomy; Forestry; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Forestry; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA J4E3F
UT WOS:001336607400001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Fan, HJ
   Xue, L
   Ma, H
AF Fan, Hongjian
   Xue, Lu
   Ma, Hao
TI Optimization of planting date and irrigation strategy for sustainable
   cotton production
SO FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE AquaCrop model; irrigation quota; planting date; predicting yield;
   climate change
ID CROP WATER PRODUCTIVITY; AQUACROP MODEL; CLIMATE-CHANGE; YIELD RESPONSE;
   SIMULATION; IMPACTS; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; REQUIREMENTS; PERFORMANCE;
   QUALITY
AB Introduction The study aims to evaluate the impact of climatological factors on rice yield and methane emissions in Southern Shaanxi's rice cultivation areas, with the goal of informing effective Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) strategies.Methods A three-year longitudinal analysis (2017-2019) was conducted, examining the correlation between rice productivity and weather conditions within the agricultural ecosystem. Data on rice yields and methane emissions were collected and analyzed to determine patterns and trends.Results Significant correlations were identified between rice yield and weather conditions, with favorable weather for rice growth correlating with higher methane emissions. Methane emissions were particularly high during the vegetative and reproductive stages of rice growth, peaking 60 to 90 days after transplanting. Average emissions for this period were 245.2 +/- 80.1 kg CH4 ha-1 in 2017, 274.2 +/- 93.9 kg CH4 ha-1 in 2018, and 339.6 +/- 50.3 kg CH4 ha-1 in 2019. Total cumulative methane emissions over the entire rice cultivation period were 635.0 +/- 177.2 kg CH4 ha-1 in 2017, 661.2 +/- 239.2 kg CH4 ha-1 in 2018, and 679.4 +/- 205.4 kg CH4 ha-1 in 2019, with no statistically significant interannual differences.Discussion The findings highlight the need to balance the goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions for climate change mitigation with the enhancement of rice yield within CSA practices. The organic link between rice productivity and methane emissions under varying weather conditions suggests that an integrated approach to CSA is essential, considering climate adaptability, productivity, and greenhouse gas reduction. The study's results contribute to a deeper scientific understanding of local agricultural ecosystems and provide a basis for developing management techniques for CSA.Conclusion An integrated approach to CSA that takes into account the interplay between rice yield, methane emissions, and climatological factors is crucial for achieving sustainable agricultural practices in Southern Shaanxi. The study's insights can guide the development of strategies that enhance both rice productivity and environmental sustainability.
C1 [Fan, Hongjian] Shaanxi Prov Land Engn Construction Grp Co Ltd, Land Engn Technol Transformat Ctr, Xian, Peoples R China.
   [Fan, Hongjian] Shaanxi Prov Land Engn Construct Grp Co Ltd, Minist Nat Resources, Land Engn Technol Innovat Ctr, Xian, Peoples R China.
   [Fan, Hongjian] Shaanxi Prov Land Engn Construct Grp Co Ltd, Inst Land Engn & Technol, Xian, Peoples R China.
   [Xue, Lu] Yulin Univ, Coll Life Sci, Yulin, Peoples R China.
   [Ma, Hao] Xijing Univ, Sch Elect Informat, Xian, Peoples R China.
C3 Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China; Yulin
   University; Xijing University
RP Fan, HJ (corresponding author), Shaanxi Prov Land Engn Construction Grp Co Ltd, Land Engn Technol Transformat Ctr, Xian, Peoples R China.; Fan, HJ (corresponding author), Shaanxi Prov Land Engn Construct Grp Co Ltd, Minist Nat Resources, Land Engn Technol Innovat Ctr, Xian, Peoples R China.; Fan, HJ (corresponding author), Shaanxi Prov Land Engn Construct Grp Co Ltd, Inst Land Engn & Technol, Xian, Peoples R China.
EM 201820828@stumail.nwu.edu.cn
FU Postdoctoral Research Funding Program of Shaanxi Province
   [2023BSHEDZZ238]; High-level Talents Scientific Research Start-up Fund
   Project of Yulin University [2023GK13]; New Star of Science and
   Technology Talent Program of Yulin [CXY-2022-137]; Natural Science
   Research Project of the Education Department in Shaanxi Province of
   China [22JK0636]
FX The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the
   research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research
   was funded by the Postdoctoral Research Funding Program of Shaanxi
   Province (2023BSHEDZZ238), the High-level Talents Scientific Research
   Start-up Fund Project of Yulin University (2023GK13), the "New Star of
   Science and Technology" Talent Program of Yulin (CXY-2022-137), the
   Natural Science Research Project of the Education Department in Shaanxi
   Province of China (22JK0636).
CR Abedinpour M, 2012, AGR WATER MANAGE, V110, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.04.001
   Abrha B, 2012, EXP AGR, V48, P252, DOI 10.1017/S0014479711001190
   Ahmadi M, 2021, AGR WATER MANAGE, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106969
   Andarzian B, 2011, AGR WATER MANAGE, V100, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.08.023
   Angella G, 2016, IRRIGATION SCI, V34, P71, DOI 10.1007/s00271-015-0486-0
   Araya A, 2010, AGR WATER MANAGE, V97, P1838, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.06.021
   Bisbis MB, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V170, P1602, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.224
   Braunack MV, 2012, FIELD CROP RES, V137, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.08.018
   Chen YZ, 2016, FIELD CROP RES, V189, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.003
   Conaty WC, 2015, FIELD CROP RES, V183, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.08.010
   Ding BX, 2023, IND CROP PROD, V205, DOI 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117553
   Dong HZ, 2010, FIELD CROP RES, V119, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.06.019
   Feng L, 2017, FIELD CROP RES, V208, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.03.008
   Foster T, 2017, AGR WATER MANAGE, V181, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.11.015
   Geerts S, 2010, AGR WATER MANAGE, V98, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.07.003
   Greaves GE, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8120557
   Jin XL, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0086938
   Kang SZ, 2017, AGR WATER MANAGE, V179, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.05.007
   Khalid N, 2023, J HAZARD MATER, V445, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130455
   Khoshravesh M, 2013, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V67, P232, DOI 10.2166/wst.2012.564
   Kim D, 2015, AGR WATER MANAGE, V149, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.10.013
   Li FW, 2019, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V33, P39, DOI 10.1007/s11269-018-2087-1
   Li Z, 2020, AGR WATER MANAGE, V231, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106020
   Linker R, 2016, AGR WATER MANAGE, V163, P236, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.09.011
   Niu G, 2016, AGR WATER MANAGE, V166, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.12.011
   Read JJ, 2006, EUR J AGRON, V24, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2005.10.004
   Ren FT, 2021, AGR WATER MANAGE, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106859
   Saadi S, 2015, AGR WATER MANAGE, V147, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.05.008
   Sandhu R, 2019, AGR WATER MANAGE, V224, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105753
   Srivastava RK, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V339, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130599
   Stricevic R, 2011, AGR WATER MANAGE, V98, P1615, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.05.011
   Surendran U, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V309, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127272
   Tan S, 2018, AGR WATER MANAGE, V196, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.11.001
   Tanasijevic L, 2014, AGR WATER MANAGE, V144, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.05.019
   Vanuytrecht E, 2014, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V62, P351, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.08.005
   Voloudakis D, 2015, AGR WATER MANAGE, V147, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.028
   Wang XP, 2020, AGR WATER MANAGE, V241, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106378
   Zhou YQ, 2024, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V912, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169327
   Zinkernagel J, 2020, AGR WATER MANAGE, V242, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106404
   Zou MZ, 2020, J HYDROL, V585, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124323
NR 40
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 4
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2571-581X
J9 FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S
JI Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
PD AUG 29
PY 2024
VL 8
AR 1431339
DI 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1431339
PG 11
WC Food Science & Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Food Science & Technology
GA F4W8K
UT WOS:001309846100001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Nooni, IK
   Ogou, FK
   Hagan, DFT
   Chaibou, AAS
   Prempeh, NA
   Nakoty, FM
   Jin, ZF
   Lu, J
AF Nooni, Isaac Kwesi
   Ogou, Faustin Katchele
   Hagan, Daniel Fiifi Tawiah
   Chaibou, Abdoul Aziz Saidou
   Prempeh, Nana Agyemang
   Nakoty, Francis Mawuli
   Jin, Zhongfang
   Lu, Jiao
TI The Relationship between Changes in Hydro-Climate Factors and Maize Crop
   Production in the Equatorial African Region from 1980 to 2021
SO ATMOSPHERE
LA English
DT Article
DE climatology; precipitation; temperature; evapotranspiration; soil
   moisture; maize production; yield; climate change; Equatorial Africa
ID CULTIVAR SELECTION; LAND EVAPORATION; NORTHEAST CHINA; VARIABILITY;
   IMPACT; YIELD; LAST; EFFICIENCY
AB Agricultural production across the African continent is subjected to various effects of climate variability. One of the main staple foods in Sub-Saharan Africa is maize. However, limited scientific research has recently focused on understanding the possible effects of hydro-climatic variability on maize production. The aim of the present work was to contribute to policy and climate adaptation, thus reducing the vulnerability of maize production to climate change over Equatorial Africa. This study firstly examined long-term trends of precipitation (PRE), soil moisture (SM), actual evapotranspiration (E), and potential evapotranspiration (Ep), as well as surface air temperatures, including the minimum (TMIN) and maximum (TMAX). Secondly, the relationship between maize production and these climate variables was quantified for 18 Equatorial African countries (EQCs) over 1980-2021. To assess the linear trends, Mann-Kendall and Sen's slope tests were used to quantify the magnitude of the hydro-climatic variable trends at the 5% significance level, and Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relation of these climate parameters with the maize production. The annual mean PRE declined at 0.03 mm day(-1)10a(-1). Other climate variables increased at different rates: SM at 0.02 mmday(-1)10a(-1), E at 0.03 mm day(-1)10a(-1), Ep at 0.02 mm day(-1) 10a(-1), TMIN and TMAX at 0.01 degrees C day(-1)10a(-1). A regional analysis revealed heterogeneous significant wet-dry and warm-cool trends over the EQCs. While, spatially, dry and warm climates were observed in the central to eastern areas, wet and warm conditions dominated the western regions. Generally, the correlations of maize production with the E, Ep, TMAX, and TMIN were strong (r > 0.7) and positive, while moderate (r > 0.45) correlations of maize production with PRE and SM were obvious. These country-wide analyses highlight the significance of climate change policies and offer a scientific basis for designing tailored adaptation strategies in rainfed agricultural regions.
C1 [Nooni, Isaac Kwesi; Lu, Jiao] Wuxi Univ, Sch Atmospher Sci & Remote Sensing, Wuxi 214105, Peoples R China.
   [Ogou, Faustin Katchele] Univ Abomey Calavi, Dept Phys, Lab Atmospher Phys, 01 BP 526, Cotonou, Benin.
   [Hagan, Daniel Fiifi Tawiah] Univ Ghent, Hydroclimate Extremes Lab, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
   [Chaibou, Abdoul Aziz Saidou] Univ Abdou Moumouni, Fac Sci & Tech, Dept Phys, Niamey, Niger.
   [Prempeh, Nana Agyemang] Univ Energy & Nat Resources, Sch Geosci, Dept Atmospher & Climate Sci, POB 214, Sunyani, Ghana.
   [Nakoty, Francis Mawuli] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China.
   [Jin, Zhongfang] Wuxi Univ, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Wuxi 214105, Peoples R China.
C3 Wuxi University; University of Abomey Calavi; Ghent University; Abdou
   Moumouni University; Nanjing University of Information Science &
   Technology; Wuxi University
RP Lu, J (corresponding author), Wuxi Univ, Sch Atmospher Sci & Remote Sensing, Wuxi 214105, Peoples R China.
EM nooni25593@alumni.itc.nl; ogofaustin@gmail.com; daniel.hagan@ugent.be;
   abdoulaziz.saidou@uam.edu.ne; agyemang.prempeh@uenr.edu.gh;
   francisnakoty@outlook.com; jinzhongfang@cwxu.edu.cn; jiao_lu@cwxu.edu.cn
RI Saidou Chaibou, Abdoul Aziz/AAD-9746-2022; Prempeh, Dr.
   Nana/ACT-9819-2022; OGOU, Faustin Katchele/AAY-5501-2021; Prempeh, Nana
   Agyemang/I-4369-2017; Nooni (Ph.D), Isaac Kwesi/H-9267-2016
OI Jin, Zhongfang/0000-0001-8959-3428; Hagan, Daniel Fiifi
   T./0000-0003-3501-9783; OGOU, Faustin Katchele/0000-0002-0342-7929;
   Saidou Chaibou, Abdoul Aziz/0000-0002-0560-7050; Prempeh, Nana
   Agyemang/0000-0001-6938-8734; Nooni (Ph.D), Isaac
   Kwesi/0000-0001-6636-9554
FU Wuxi University Starting Project [2021r010]; CMOS image sensor (Wuxi
   Univ Starting Project); School of Atmospheric Science and Remote
   Sensing, Wuxi University
FX We are very grateful to the institutions for making their datasets
   available for use in accordance with their specific data-use and
   citation policies: We acknowledge the technical support provided by the
   medical imaging platform with the CMOS image sensor (Wuxi Univ Starting
   Project 2021r010) and the design of minimally invasive surgery robot
   project by the School of Atmospheric Science and Remote Sensing, Wuxi
   University.
CR Abate T, 2015, FOOD SECUR, V7, P965, DOI 10.1007/s12571-015-0488-z
   Abera K., 2018, Environ. Syst. Res, V7, P4, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40068-018-0107-Z
   Adeyeri OE, 2020, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V11, P1339, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2019.283
   Adeyeri OE, 2021, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V308, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108574
   Adhikari U, 2015, FOOD ENERGY SECUR, V4, P110, DOI 10.1002/fes3.61
   Amede T, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15075731
   [Anonymous], 2014, The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2014.Strengthening the enabling environment for food security and nutrition
   [Anonymous], Shuttle Radar Topography Mission website"
   Baffour-Ata F, 2023, CURR RES ENVIRON SUS, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.crsust.2023.100222
   Basso B., 2013, Review of Crop Yield Forecasting Methods and Early Warning Systems
   Beck HE, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2018.214
   Beyene SD, 2023, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V23, DOI 10.1186/s12889-023-15244-3
   Biradar CM, 2009, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V11, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2008.11.002
   Bjornlund V, 2022, FOOD SECUR, V14, P845, DOI 10.1007/s12571-022-01256-1
   Brenya R, 2023, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2023.100678
   Bruinsma J., 2003, World agriculture: towards 2015/2030. An FAO perspective
   Camberlin P, 2017, CLIM DYNAM, V48, P477, DOI 10.1007/s00382-016-3088-5
   Chen MY, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V113, DOI 10.1029/2007JD009132
   De Groote H, 2023, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2023.100676
   Diasso U, 2017, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V128, P223, DOI 10.1007/s00704-015-1705-6
   Edmonds DE, 2009, J PLANT NUTR, V32, P2107, DOI 10.1080/01904160903308184
   ESACCI European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative (ESACCI), Land Use Land Cover (LULC) Map
   FAO, 1991, Water and Soil Requirements
   Farooq M, 2015, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V35, P461, DOI 10.1007/s13593-015-0287-0
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Gebrechorkos SH, 2019, INT J CLIMATOL, V39, P18, DOI 10.1002/joc.5777
   Girma Y., 2023, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, V16, P87, DOI DOI 10.3390/JRFM16020087
   Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM), Homepaage
   Higginbottom TP, 2023, ENVIRON RES LETT, V18, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/acaa46
   Jensen M. E., 1968, Water Deficits and Plant Growth., V2, P1
   Jiménez-Muñoz JC, 2013, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V106, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.02.010
   Kamara AY, 2024, CLIM DEV, V16, P67, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2023.2178840
   Karl T. R., 2009, Global climate change impacts in the United States
   Kebede D, 2023, LAND USE POLICY, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106507
   Kheir A.M.S., 2022, Global Agricultural Production: Resilience to Climate Change, P183, DOI [10.1007/978-3-031-14973-3_6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-14973-3_6]
   Kirui OK, 2023, AGREKON, V62, P80, DOI 10.1080/03031853.2023.2176894
   Kogo BK, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P23, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-00589-1
   Lesk C, 2022, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V3, P872, DOI 10.1038/s43017-022-00368-8
   Li X, 2011, AGR SYST, V104, P348, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.12.006
   Li ZG, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P39, DOI 10.1007/s10113-013-0503-x
   Liu YW, 2022, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101013
   Liu ZJ, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P3481, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12324
   Lobell DB, 2007, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V145, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.05.002
   Mann HB, 1945, ECONOMETRICA, V13, P245, DOI 10.2307/1907187
   Martens B, 2017, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V10, P1903, DOI 10.5194/gmd-10-1903-2017
   Masson-Delmotte V, 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE 2021, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009157896
   Miralles DG, 2011, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V15, P967, DOI 10.5194/hess-15-967-2011
   Miralles DG, 2011, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V15, P453, DOI 10.5194/hess-15-453-2011
   Mozny M, 2012, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V107, P99, DOI 10.1007/s00704-011-0460-6
   Myeni L, 2019, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V21, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.11.004
   Nicholson SE, 2013, HOLOCENE, V23, P1085, DOI 10.1177/0959683613483618
   Niu XK, 2013, J INTEGR AGR, V12, P630, DOI 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60281-6
   noaa, HOM
   Nooni IK, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15123201
   Nooni IK, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13030533
   Nooni IK, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11071400
   Olasehinde TS, 2023, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/agriculture13030611
   Palmer PI, 2023, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V4, P254, DOI 10.1038/s43017-023-00397-x
   Rezaei EE, 2023, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V4, P831, DOI 10.1038/s43017-023-00491-0
   Schlenker W, 2010, ENVIRON RES LETT, V5, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014010
   Schulzweida Uwe., 2021, CDO USER GUIDE VERSI, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.5614769, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.5614769]
   SEN PK, 1968, J AM STAT ASSOC, V63, P1379
   Simanjuntak C, 2023, SCI REP-UK, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-38921-0
   Tadesse T, 2015, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V40, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2015.03.006
   Troy TJ, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/5/054013
   US Department of Agriculture, Homepage
   USAID, 2014, Agricultural Adaptation to Climate Change in the Sahel
   van Ittersum MK, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P14964, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1610359113
   Vogel E, 2018, RESILIENCE: THE SCIENCE OF ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE, P31, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-811891-7.00003-7
   Wang TX, 2022, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V199, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2022.107101
   Xie PP, 2007, J HYDROMETEOROL, V8, P607, DOI 10.1175/JHM583.1
   Yuan ZJ, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14010074
   Zhang ZX, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.954940
   Zhao J, 2015, EUR J AGRON, V67, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2015.03.006
   Zhu P, 2022, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V12, P1016, DOI 10.1038/s41558-022-01492-5
NR 75
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 2
U2 2
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4433
J9 ATMOSPHERE-BASEL
JI Atmosphere
PD MAY
PY 2024
VL 15
IS 5
AR 542
DI 10.3390/atmos15050542
PG 21
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA SF8I2
UT WOS:001233129000001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Gruszka, K
   Aksoy, S
   Rózylo-Kalinowska, I
   Gülbes, MM
   Kalinowski, P
   Orhan, K
AF Gruszka, Katarzyna
   Aksoy, Secil
   Rozylo-Kalinowska, Ingrid
   Gulbes, Melis Misirli
   Kalinowski, Pawel
   Orhan, Kaan
TI A comparative study of paranasal sinus and nasal cavity anatomic
   variations between the Polish and Turkish Cypriot Population with CBCT
SO HEAD & FACE MEDICINE
LA English
DT Article
DE Sinonasal anatomy; Variations; Climate; CBCT
ID AIR-FLOW DYNAMICS; SEPTAL DEVIATION; CONCHA-BULLOSA; SPHENOID SINUS;
   FRONTAL-SINUS; CLIMATE; PNEUMATIZATION; PREVALENCE; ALTITUDE; REGION
AB Background Genetic and environmental factors especially climatic conditions are thought to influence the shape and size of the paranasal sinuses and anatomic variations may create both a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. However, no study has been published about the climatic adaptation of the paranasal sinus region in different populations. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of anatomical variants in the paranasal sinus and nasal cavity using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) between Polish and Turkish Cypriot populations. Methods The material consisted of volumes acquired utilizing Galileos (Sirona, Germany) as well as Newtom 3G (QR Verona, Newtom, Italy) CBCT units. There were examined 356 Polish and 359 Turkish Cypriot patients in whom paranasal sinuses were included in the field of view. Paranasal sinus anatomic variations were assessed in both populations. Results In the Polish population, the most common anatomic variation was septum deviation followed by the Agger nasi cell and concha bullosa with a prevalence of 87.7%, 83.2%, and 54.8% respectively. For the Turkish Cypriot population, the most common anatomic variation was Agger nasi cell followed by concha bullosa and supraorbital ethmoid cells with a prevalence of 81.6%, 68%, and 57.8% respectively. Many anatomic variations were found to show substantial differences among both populations. Incidence rates of hyperpneumatization of the frontal sinus, septum pneumatization, supraorbital ethmoid cells, concha bullosa, uncinate bulla, and internal carotid artery protrusion into the sphenoid sinus were significantly higher in the Turkish Cypriot group, while the incidence of Haller cell, frontal sinus hypoplasia, maxillary sinus hypoplasia, ethmomaxillary sinus, sphenomaxillary plate, and septum deviation were significantly higher in Polish population. Conclusion According to the Koppen-Geiger world climatic map, the climate is warmer and drier in Turkish Cypriote populations than in the Polish population. These climatic differences influence the paranasal sinus variations between the Turkish Cypriot and Polish populations that must be taken into account by rhinologic surgeons especially when performing frontal and sphenoid sinus surgery.
C1 [Gruszka, Katarzyna] Private Clin, Frampol, Poland.
   [Aksoy, Secil] Near East Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Mersin 10, TR-99138 Nicosia, Turkey.
   [Rozylo-Kalinowska, Ingrid; Orhan, Kaan] Med Univ Lublin, Dept Dent & Maxillofacial Radiodiagnost, PL-20093 Lublin, Poland.
   [Gulbes, Melis Misirli] Int Final Univ, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Mersin 10, TR-99138 Nicosia, Turkey.
   [Kalinowski, Pawel] Med Univ Lublin, Dept Hyg & Epidemiol, PL-20093 Lublin, Poland.
   [Orhan, Kaan] Ankara Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey.
   [Orhan, Kaan] Ankara Univ, Med Design Applicat & Res Ctr MEDITAM, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey.
C3 Near East University; Medical University of Lublin; Medical University
   of Lublin; Ankara University; Ankara University
RP Aksoy, S (corresponding author), Near East Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Mersin 10, TR-99138 Nicosia, Turkey.
EM secil.aksoy@neu.edu.tr
RI Orhan, Kaan/I-4026-2019
OI Orhan, Kaan/0000-0001-6768-0176
CR Ahmad M, 2006, ORAL SURG ORAL MED O, V101, P658, DOI 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.08.035
   Aktas D, 2003, RHINOLOGY, V41, P103
   Al-Qudah M, 2008, INT J PEDIATR OTORHI, V72, P817, DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.02.006
   Arslan H, 1999, Auris Nasus Larynx, V26, P39, DOI 10.1016/S0385-8146(98)00024-8
   Asirdizer M, 2017, INT J MORPHOL, V35, P571, DOI 10.4067/S0717-95022017000200031
   Badia L, 2005, RHINOLOGY, V43, P210
   Bradley DT, 2004, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V131, P525, DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.03.038
   Chaiyasate S, 2007, CLIN OTOLARYNGOL, V32, P93, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2007.01404.x
   Cho JH, 2006, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V135, P780, DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.05.750
   Churchill SE, 2004, AM J HUM BIOL, V16, P625, DOI 10.1002/ajhb.20074
   Daniels DL, 2003, AM J NEURORADIOL, V24, P1618
   Evteev A, 2014, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V153, P449, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.22444
   Fadda GL, 2021, AM J RHINOL ALLERGY, V35, P871, DOI 10.1177/19458924211020549
   Franciscus RG, 2003, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, P96
   Güldner C, 2012, ACTA RADIOL, V53, P214, DOI 10.1258/ar.2011.110381
   Haruna S, 2005, INT J PEDIATR OTORHI, V69, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.11.002
   Hewaidi GH, 2008, LIBYAN J MED, V3, P128, DOI 10.4176/080307
   Hodez C, 2011, EUR ANN OTORHINOLARY, V128, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.anorl.2010.10.008
   Hubbe M, 2009, ANAT REC, V292, P1720, DOI 10.1002/ar.20976
   Javadrashid R, 2014, B-ENT, V10, P291
   Kantarci M, 2004, EUR J RADIOL, V50, P296, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.08.012
   Khalil HS, 2011, BMC EAR NOSE THROAT, V11, DOI 10.1186/1472-6815-11-4
   Kim HJ, 2006, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, V126, P1067, DOI 10.1080/00016480600606681
   Kucybala I, 2017, POL J RADIOL, V82, P126, DOI 10.12659/PJR.900634
   Nitinavakarn Benjaporn, 2005, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, V88, P763
   Noback ML, 2011, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V145, P599, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.21523
   Orhan K., 2017, PARANASAL SINUSES, P57
   Peel MC, 2007, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V11, P1633, DOI 10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007
   Robinson M, 2010, RHINOLOGY, V48, P11, DOI 10.4193/Rhin09.083
   Selcuk OT, 2015, J CRANIO MAXILL SURG, V43, P1059, DOI 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.05.013
   Sivash E, 2003, SURG RADIOL ANAT, V24, P400, DOI 10.1007/s00276-002-0074-x
   Smith KD, 2010, INT J DENT, V2010, DOI 10.1155/2010/404982
   Stallman JS, 2004, AM J NEURORADIOL, V25, P1613
   Teul I, 2009, EUR J MED RES, V14, P244, DOI 10.1186/2047-783X-14-S4-244
   Unal B, 2006, SURG RADIOL ANAT, V28, P195, DOI 10.1007/s00276-005-0073-9
   Wormald PJ, 2003, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V129, P497, DOI 10.1016/S0194-5998(03)01581-X
   Yilmaz NA, 2010, INT J PEDIATR OTORHI, V74, P796, DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.04.004
   Zinreich SJ., 2002, HEAD NECK IMAGING, P3
NR 38
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 0
U2 11
PU BMC
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND
EI 1746-160X
J9 HEAD FACE MED
JI Head Face Med.
PD NOV 26
PY 2022
VL 18
IS 1
AR 37
DI 10.1186/s13005-022-00340-3
PG 10
WC Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
GA 6M3XE
UT WOS:000888803500001
PM 36435801
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wang, XQ
   Guo, JH
   Fenech, A
   Farooque, AA
AF Wang, Xiuquan
   Guo, Junhong
   Fenech, Adam
   Farooque, Aitazaz A.
TI Future climate projections for Eastern Canada
SO CLIMATE DYNAMICS
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate projections; Regional climate modeling; Eastern Canada; PRECIS;
   RCPs
ID WATER-RESOURCES; TEMPERATURE; PRECIS; PRECIPITATION; ICE; INCREASES;
   ONTARIO; MODELS; CHINA
AB Recent global warming has caused significant changes to the regional climate over Eastern Canada and brought unprecedented challenges to the local communities, such as rising sea level, shrinking sea ice coverage, increasing coastal and inland floods, accelerated coastal erosion, and so on. Although local governments have declared climate emergency in recent years, there is still a lack of real climate actions due to the poor understanding of the future climatic changes over Eastern Canada and how to mitigate and adapt to those changes from a long-term perspective. Here we attempt to fill this gap by developing high-resolution regional climate scenarios for Eastern Canada throughout the twenty-first century under three greenhouse gases emission scenarios (RCP2.6-low, RCP4.5-medium, and RCP8.5-high). The results suggest that the low-emission scenario of RCP2.6 would potentially stabilize the regional climate (i.e., no significant changes in both temperature and precipitation) over Eastern Canada after the continuous warming reaches its peak in the middle of this century. However, an average warming about 1 degrees C would still be expected from now to the end of this century under RCP2.6, highlighting the importance of preparing for a new climate normal even though strict carbon reduction efforts could be made before 2050. In comparison, both RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios would lead to a continuous warming over Eastern Canada with increased total precipitation throughout this century. Most importantly, the warming trend under RCP8.5 is likely to accelerate after 2050, which would potentially cause significant shifts in the precipitation seasonality and bring more climate extremes, such as droughts in August, increasing spring and fall floods, more freezing rains between fall and winter, and more heavy snowfalls in winter. The results from this study can help the local policy makers understand the importance and scientific implications of taking immediate carbon reduction actions and developing long-term climate adaptation plans.
C1 [Wang, Xiuquan; Fenech, Adam; Farooque, Aitazaz A.] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Canadian Ctr Climate Change & Adaptat, St Peters Bay, PE C0A 2A0, Canada.
   [Wang, Xiuquan; Fenech, Adam; Farooque, Aitazaz A.] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Sch Climate Change & Adaptat, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.
   [Guo, Junhong] North China Elect Power Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, MOE Key Lab Resource & Environm Syst Optimizat, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China.
   [Farooque, Aitazaz A.] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Fac Sustainable Design Engn, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.
C3 University of Prince Edward Island; University of Prince Edward Island;
   North China Electric Power University; University of Prince Edward
   Island
RP Wang, XQ (corresponding author), Univ Prince Edward Isl, Canadian Ctr Climate Change & Adaptat, St Peters Bay, PE C0A 2A0, Canada.; Wang, XQ (corresponding author), Univ Prince Edward Isl, Sch Climate Change & Adaptat, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.
EM xxwang@upei.ca
RI Guo, Junhong/O-6316-2017; Wang, Xander/Q-9659-2018
OI Wang, Xander/0000-0002-3718-3416
FU Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada; New
   Frontiers in Research Fund; Atlantic Computational Excellence Network
   (ACENET)
FX This research was supported by the Natural Science and Engineering
   Research Council of Canada, the New Frontiers in Research Fund, and the
   Atlantic Computational Excellence Network (ACENET).
CR AghaKouchak A, 2020, ANNU REV EARTH PL SC, V48, P519, DOI 10.1146/annurev-earth-071719-055228
   [Anonymous], 2007, From Impacts to Adaptation: Canada in a Changing Climate
   Barthel A, 2020, CRYOSPHERE, V14, P855, DOI 10.5194/tc-14-855-2020
   Bernier NB, 2007, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V112, DOI 10.1029/2006JC003793
   Boon JD, 2012, J COASTAL RES, V28, P1437, DOI 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-12-00102.1
   Brander K, 2010, J MARINE SYST, V79, P389, DOI 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.12.015
   Buttle J, 2016, CAN WATER RESOUR J, V41, P1, DOI 10.1080/07011784.2016.1164495
   Clark NJ, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P862, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0838-5
   Collins W., 2008, Evaluation of the HadGEM2 Model, DOI DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
   Erler AR, 2019, WATER RESOUR RES, V55, P130, DOI [10.1029/2018WR024381, 10.1029/2018wr024381]
   Feser F, 2011, B AM METEOROL SOC, V92, P1181, DOI 10.1175/2011BAMS3061.1
   Fick SE, 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P4302, DOI 10.1002/joc.5086
   Graham RM, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P6974, DOI 10.1002/2017GL073395
   Guo JH, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V718, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137350
   Harris I., 2014, International Journal of Climatology, V34, P623, DOI 10.1002/joc.3711
   Johnston DW, 2005, CLIM RES, V29, P209, DOI 10.3354/cr029209
   Jones R.G., 2004, GENERATING HIGH RESO, P40
   Jubb I., 2013, REPRESENTATIVE CONCE, P5
   Kang SM, 2015, CLIM DYNAM, V44, P1457, DOI 10.1007/s00382-014-2147-z
   King AD, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8e2c
   Kumar N, 2017, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V13, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.07.008
   Long QX, 2020, NAT MED, V26, P845, DOI 10.1038/s41591-020-0897-1
   MacMillan MR, 2017, J SEA RES, V125, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.seares.2017.05.005
   McDermid J., 2015, CLIMATE CHANGE PROJE
   Mondal MS, 2020, CLIMATE, V8, DOI 10.3390/cli8020020
   NIZIOL TA, 1995, WEATHER FORECAST, V10, P61, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(1995)010<0061:WWFTTE>2.0.CO;2
   PEACE RL, 1966, MON WEATHER REV, V94, P495, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1966)094<0495:MSOALE>2.3.CO;2
   Peltier WR, 2018, J CLIMATE, V31, P2651, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0416.1
   Perez J, 2014, CLIM DYNAM, V43, P2663, DOI 10.1007/s00382-014-2078-8
   Polyakov IV, 2012, J CLIMATE, V25, P8362, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00266.1
   Rahel FJ, 2008, CONSERV BIOL, V22, P521, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00950.x
   Rangwala I, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024040
   Reisinger A, 2011, ENVIRON RES LETT, V6, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024020
   Rupak Rajbhandari Rupak Rajbhandari, 2018, Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, V8, P163, DOI 10.4236/acs.2018.82012
   Sharma S, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P227, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0393-5
   Thibodeau B, 2018, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V45, P12376, DOI 10.1029/2018GL080083
   van Vuuren DP, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P5, DOI [10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z, 10.1007/s10584-011-0157-y]
   Wang XQ, 2015, CLIM DYNAM, V45, P1381, DOI 10.1007/s00382-014-2387-y
   Wang XQ, 2016, CLIM DYNAM, V46, P3979, DOI 10.1007/s00382-015-2816-6
   Wang XQ, 2015, J CLIMATE, V28, P7327, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0185.1
   Wang XQ, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V119, P13271, DOI 10.1002/2014JD022564
   Wang XQ, 2014, J CLIMATE, V27, P5259, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00717.1
   Wheaton E, 2008, CAN GEOGR-GEOGR CAN, V52, P241, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-0064.2008.00211.x
   Wilson S., 2005, PRECIS. Version, V1, P157
   Wu Y, 2021, ATMOS RES, V249, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105303
   Zhang L, 2020, J GREAT LAKES RES, V46, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.jglr.2020.01.013
   Zhou X, 2018, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V144, P588, DOI 10.1002/qj.3231
   Zhu JX, 2018, CLIM DYNAM, V50, P4037, DOI 10.1007/s00382-017-3860-1
NR 48
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 1
U2 28
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 0930-7575
EI 1432-0894
J9 CLIM DYNAM
JI Clim. Dyn.
PD NOV
PY 2022
VL 59
IS 9-10
BP 2735
EP 2750
DI 10.1007/s00382-022-06251-y
EA MAR 2022
PG 16
WC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA 4Z8VA
UT WOS:000770968600001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Trlica, A
   Hutyra, LR
   Morreale, LL
   Smith, IA
   Reinmann, AB
AF Trlica, Andrew
   Hutyra, Lucy R.
   Morreale, Luca L.
   Smith, Ian A.
   Reinmann, Andrew B.
TI Current and future biomass carbon uptake in Boston's urban forest
SO SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban forest; Canopy fragmentation; Carbon uptake; Climate adaptation;
   Street trees; Ecosystem services
ID NEW-YORK-CITY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE;
   LAND-USE; STORAGE; SEQUESTRATION; NITROGEN; URBANIZATION; DYNAMICS
AB Ecosystem services provided by urban forests are increasingly included in municipal-level responses to climate change. However, the ecosystem functions that generate these services, such as biomass carbon (C) uptake, can differ substantially from nearby rural forest. In particular, the scaled effect of canopy spatial configuration on tree growth in cities is uncertain, as is the scope for medium-term policy intervention. This study integrates high spatial resolution data on tree canopy and biomass in the city of Boston, Massachusetts, with local measurements of tree growth rates to estimate the magnitude and distribution of annual biomass C uptake. We further project C uptake, biomass, and canopy cover change to 2040 under alternative policy scenarios affecting the planting and preservation of urban trees. Our analysis shows that 85% of tree canopy area was within 10 m of an edge, indicating essentially open growing conditions. Using growthmodels accounting for canopy edge effects and growth context, Boston's current biomass C uptake may be approximately double (median 10.9GgC yr(-1), 0.5 MgC ha(-1) yr(-1)) the estimates based on rural forest growth, much of it occurring in high-density residential areas. Total annual C uptake to long-term biomass storage was equivalent to <1% of estimated annual fossil CO2 emissions for the city. In built-up areas, reducing mortality in larger trees resulted in the highest predicted increase in canopy cover (+25%) and biomass C stocks (236 GgC) by 2040, while planting trees in available road margins resulted in the greatest predicted annual C uptake (7.1 GgC yr(-1)). This study highlights the importance of accounting for the altered ecosystem structure and function in urban areas in evaluating ecosystem services. Effective municipal climate responses should consider the substantial fraction of total services performed by trees in developed areas, which may produce strong but localized atmospheric C sinks. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Trlica, Andrew; Hutyra, Lucy R.; Morreale, Luca L.; Smith, Ian A.] Boston Univ, Dept Earth & Environm, 685 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA.
   [Reinmann, Andrew B.] CUNY, Environm Sci Initiat, Adv Sci Res Ctr, 85 St Nicholas Terr, New York, NY 10021 USA.
   [Reinmann, Andrew B.] CUNY, Grad Ctr, PhD Program Earth & Environm Sci, 365 First Ave,Room 4306, New York, NY USA.
   [Reinmann, Andrew B.] Hunter Coll, Dept Geog & Environm Sci, 695 Pk Ave,Room 1006 HN, New York, NY USA.
C3 Boston University; City University of New York (CUNY) System; City
   University of New York (CUNY) System; City University of New York (CUNY)
   System; Hunter College (CUNY)
RP Trlica, A (corresponding author), Boston Univ, Dept Earth & Environm, 685 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA.
EM atrlica@bu.edu; lrhutyra@bu.edu; lmorreal@bu.edu; iasmith@bu.edu;
   areinmann@gc.cuny.edu
RI Hutyra, Lucy/KWU-0684-2024
OI Hutyra, Lucy/0009-0009-7229-0063; Morreale, Luca/0000-0003-2023-9150
FU National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NA14OAR4310179];
   National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX16AP23G]
FX This work was supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
   Administration grant NA14OAR4310179 and the National Aeronautics and
   Space Administration grant NNX16AP23G. The authors acknowledge Dr. Steve
   M. Raciti for the public availability of the biomass and canopy data as
   well as consultation he provided on their construction. The authors also
   acknowledge Dr. Chloe Anderson, Dr. Kira SullivanWiley, and Ana Reboredo
   Segovia for comments on early drafts of this work. We alsowish to thank
   the two anonymous reviewers of thismanuscript for their detailed and
   helpful comments prior to publications.
CR Alberti M, 2015, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V30, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.007
   [Anonymous], MASSG DAT
   [Anonymous], 2017, RASTER GEOGRAPHIC DA
   [Anonymous], 2012, ARBORIC URBAN FOR, DOI DOI 10.48044/JAUF.2012.026
   [Anonymous], MIXED EFFECTS MODELS
   [Anonymous], DAT DESCR US GUID PH
   [Anonymous], CITY BOSTON GREENHOU
   Bates D, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V67, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Bellucco V, 2017, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V236, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.12.011
   Bivand R., 2015, R package version 1.0-4
   Brack CL, 2002, ENVIRON POLLUT, V116, pS195, DOI 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00251-2
   Briber BM, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0136237
   Broto VC, 2017, WORLD DEV, V93, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.031
   Broto VC, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005
   Crawford B, 2011, ATMOS ENVIRON, V45, P896, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.017
   Danford R., 2014, Cities and The Environment (CATE), V7, P2
   Davies ZG, 2011, J APPL ECOL, V48, P1125, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02021.x
   Decina SM, 2016, ENVIRON POLLUT, V212, P433, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.012
   Dobbs C, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V592, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.058
   Dowle M., 2017, data. table: Extension ofdata. frame
   Environmental Systems Research Institute, ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Redlands, CA
   Escobedo FJ, 2011, ENVIRON POLLUT, V159, P2078, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.010
   Escobedo FJ, 2009, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V90, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.021
   Fahey TJ, 2005, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V75, P109, DOI 10.1007/s10533-004-6321-y
   Gómez-Baggethun E, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019
   Gregg JW, 2003, NATURE, V424, P183, DOI 10.1038/nature01728
   Groffman PM, 2017, ECOSYSTEMS, V20, P38, DOI 10.1007/s10021-016-0053-4
   Hardiman BS, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V592, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.028
   Hutyra LR, 2014, EARTHS FUTURE, V2, P473, DOI 10.1002/2014EF000255
   Hutyra LR, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V103, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.06.004
   Imhoff ML, 2004, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V89, P434, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2003.10.015
   Kremer P, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.012
   Larondelle N, 2013, ECOL INDIC, V29, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.022
   Lovell ST, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1447, DOI 10.1007/s10980-013-9912-y
   Magill AH, 2004, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V196, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.033
   McDonald RI, 2020, ECOSYSTEMS, V23, P137, DOI 10.1007/s10021-019-00395-5
   McPherson EG, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V120, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.08.005
   Melaas EK, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054020
   Miller DL, 2018, URBAN ECOSYST, V21, P831, DOI 10.1007/s11252-018-0769-3
   Niemelä J, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.014
   Nowak DJ, 2013, ENVIRON POLLUT, V178, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.019
   Nowak DJ, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V107, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.005
   Nowak David J., 2008, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, V34, P347
   ONeil-Dunne J., 2017, An Assessment of Bostons Tree Canopy, USDA Urban Tree Canopy Assessment
   Ossola A, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V612, P940, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.103
   Ouimette AP, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V256, P420, DOI [10.1016/j.agrformet2018.03.017, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.03.017]
   Pataki DE, 2009, ECOL COMPLEX, V6, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2008.09.003
   Pataki DE, 2013, NATURE, V502, P624, DOI 10.1038/502624d
   Pataki DE, 2011, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V9, P27, DOI 10.1890/090220
   Pincetl S, 2013, GEOJOURNAL, V78, P475, DOI 10.1007/s10708-012-9446-x
   Pretzsch H, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P466, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.04.006
   Raciti SM, 2014, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V500, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.070
   Raciti SM, 2012, ECOL APPL, V22, P1015, DOI 10.1890/11-1250.1
   Rao P, 2013, URBAN ECOSYST, V16, P593, DOI 10.1007/s11252-013-0291-6
   Reinmann AB, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P107, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1612369114
   Roman LA, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V31, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.03.004
   Roman LA, 2014, URBAN ECOSYST, V17, P387, DOI 10.1007/s11252-013-0320-5
   Roy S, 2012, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V11, P351, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.006
   Russo Alessio, 2014, International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Management, V10, P54, DOI 10.1080/21513732.2013.873822
   Ryan MG, 1997, ADV ECOL RES, V27, P213, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60009-4
   Saier MH, 2007, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V181, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11270-007-9372-6
   Sargent M, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P7491, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1803715115
   Searle SY, 2012, TREE PHYSIOL, V32, P389, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tps027
   Seto KC, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P16083, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1211658109
   Smith IA, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0215846
   Strohbach MW, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V104, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.013
   Team RC, 2014, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
   van Doorn NS, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V29, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.018
   Wang JA, 2017, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V56, P817, DOI 10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0325.1
   Zhou WQ, 2019, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V17, P135, DOI 10.1002/fee.2021
   Ziter CD, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P7575, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1817561116
NR 71
TC 33
Z9 36
U1 10
U2 180
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0048-9697
EI 1879-1026
J9 SCI TOTAL ENVIRON
JI Sci. Total Environ.
PD MAR 20
PY 2020
VL 709
AR 136196
DI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136196
PG 10
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA KJ8BS
UT WOS:000512281700118
PM 31887518
OA Green Published, Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Bonn, B
   von Schneidemesser, E
   Butler, T
   Churkina, G
   Ehlers, C
   Grote, R
   Klemp, D
   Nothard, R
   Schäfer, K
   von Stülpnagel, A
   Kerschbaumer, A
   Yousefpour, R
   Fountoukis, C
   Lawrence, MG
AF Bonn, Boris
   von Schneidemesser, Erika
   Butler, Tim
   Churkina, Galina
   Ehlers, Christian
   Grote, Ruediger
   Klemp, Dieter
   Nothard, Rainer
   Schaefer, Klaus
   von Stuelpnagel, Albrecht
   Kerschbaumer, Andreas
   Yousefpour, Rasoul
   Fountoukis, Christos
   Lawrence, Mark G.
TI Impact of vegetative emissions on urban ozone and biogenic secondary
   organic aerosol: Box model study for Berlin, Germany
SO JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban vegetation; Air pollution; Ozone; Aerosol particles; Box model
ID MASTER CHEMICAL MECHANISM; MCM V3 PART; TROPOSPHERIC DEGRADATION;
   ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; ABSORPTION-MODEL; AIR-POLLUTION; VOC EMISSIONS;
   LAND-USE; PROTOCOL; SYSTEMS
AB Tropospheric ozone and particulate matter affect human health and cause vegetation stress, dysfunction and damages. In this study we investigate the effect of increasing urban vegetation i.e. tree species on atmospheric chemistry, a potential urban management strategy to counteract high levels of local pollutants such as ozone, O-H and PM10 caused by e.g. traffic. We use an extended version of an atmospheric chemistry box model including detailed gas-phase chemistry, mixing layer height variation and secondary organic aerosol calculations based on observations for Berlin, Germany. It is shown to accurately simulate the observed ozone volume mixing ratios during the intensive measurement period in July 2014 (BAERLIN2014) if basic parameters such as nitrogen oxides, meteorological conditions, PM10 concentrations as well as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are considered as 1 h resolved datasets. Based on this setup the effects of changing present day vegetation mixture by 24 different relevant tree species and of urban greening is tested to elucidate benefits and drawbacks in order to support future urban planning. While the present day vegetation causes boundary layer ozone to decline slightly at 35 degrees C, individual tree types alter the ozone production rate and concentration as well as the secondary organic aerosol mass in different ways. Our results suggest that trees intensively emitting isoprene such as black locust, European oak and poplar result in higher ozone and total PM10 concentrations than at present, while tree species emitting primarily monoterpenes such as beech, magnolia and wayfaring trees yield less of both. This is in line with the similar behaviour of OH concentration and new particle formation rates. Thus, for future urban planning including urban greening, consideration of the beneficial and harmful aspects of tree species need to ensure that citizens benefit from and are not being negatively affected by climate adaptation strategies. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Bonn, Boris; von Schneidemesser, Erika; Butler, Tim; Grote, Ruediger; Lawrence, Mark G.] IASS, Berliner Str 130, D-14467 Potsdam, Germany.
   [Churkina, Galina] Humboldt Univ, Geog Dept, Unter Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany.
   [Grote, Ruediger; Schaefer, Klaus] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Meteorol & Climate Res, Dept Atmospher Environm Res IMK IFU, Div Reg Climate Syst, Campus Alpin,Kreuzeckbahnstr 19, D-82467 Garmisch Partenkirchen, Germany.
   [Ehlers, Christian; Klemp, Dieter] Res Ctr Julich, IEK 8, D-52425 Julich, Germany.
   [Nothard, Rainer; von Stuelpnagel, Albrecht; Kerschbaumer, Andreas] Senate Dept Urban Dev & Environm, Brilckenstr 6, D-10179 Berlin, Germany.
   [Yousefpour, Rasoul] Albert Ludwig Univ, Chair Forestry Econ & Forest Planning, Tennenbacher Str 4, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany.
   [Fountoukis, Christos] Hamad Bin Khalifa Univ, QEERI, Qatar Fdn, Doha, Qatar.
   [Bonn, Boris] Albert Ludwig Univ, Chair Tree Physiol, Georges Koehler Allee 053, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany.
   [Ehlers, Christian] Landesamt Nat Umwelt & Verbraucherschutz, Abt 4, Luftqualitat, Gerausche,Erschaterungen,Strahlenschutz, Wallneyer Str 6, D-45133 Essen, Germany.
C3 Humboldt University of Berlin; Helmholtz Association; Karlsruhe
   Institute of Technology; Helmholtz Association; Research Center Julich;
   Qatar Foundation (QF); Hamad Bin Khalifa University-Qatar; Qatar
   Environment & Energy Research Institute
RP Bonn, B (corresponding author), IASS, Berliner Str 130, D-14467 Potsdam, Germany.; Bonn, B (corresponding author), Albert Ludwig Univ, Chair Tree Physiol, Georges Koehler Allee 053, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany.
EM Boris.Bonn@ctp.uni-freiburg.de
RI Fountoukis, Christos/IVV-1277-2023; von Schneidemesser,
   Erika/AAL-8777-2021; Dr. Schäfer, Klaus/A-6173-2013; Yousefpour,
   Rasoul/F-1601-2017; Butler, Tim/G-1139-2011; Grote, Rüdiger/A-7350-2013
OI Dr. Schafer, Klaus Georg/0000-0003-2491-6331; Lawrence,
   Mark/0000-0002-2178-4903; von Schneidemesser, Erika/0000-0003-1386-285X;
   Churkina, Galina/0000-0002-5895-7425; Butler,
   Timothy/0000-0002-2219-4657
FU Federal Ministry (BMBF); Federal Ministry (MWFK); Brandenburg Ministry
   (BMBF); Brandenburg Ministry (MWFK)
FX This work was done primarily at the Institute of Advanced Sustainability
   Studies (LASS) in Potsdam, Germany and was funded by the Federal and
   Brandenburg Ministries (BMBF and MWFK). Thanks for the financial support
   and engagement of all the numerous co-workers without whom this study
   would have been impossible. Christoph Munkel, Vaisala GmbH, Hamburg
   should be thanked for his important support during measurement and
   analysis. Thanks very much to the CARES and CalNex participants for
   sharing their data and to Klaus Muller (Free University of Berlin,
   Germany), for providing the meteorological data from the Botanical
   Garden allowing a basic radiation correction. Special thanks to all
   BAERLIN2014 partners for excellent cooperation, sharing the data and
   making this study possible.
CR Affolderbach J, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V164, P676, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.234
   [Anonymous], 2006, ATMOS CHEM PHYS
   Atkinson R, 2006, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V6, P3625, DOI 10.5194/acp-6-3625-2006
   Berlin Senate, 2010, FLACH STADTSTR
   Bloss C, 2005, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V5, P641, DOI 10.5194/acp-5-641-2005
   Bonn B, 2016, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V16, P7785, DOI 10.5194/acp-16-7785-2016
   Butler TM, 2011, ATMOS ENVIRON, V45, P4082, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.040
   Calfapietra C, 2013, ENVIRON POLLUT, V183, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.012
   Churkina G, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V47, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.014
   Churkina G, 2017, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V51, P6120, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b06514
   Chuwah C, 2015, ATMOS ENVIRON, V106, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.062
   Donahue NM, 2006, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V40, P2635, DOI 10.1021/es052297c
   Drewniak BA, 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/9/1/014006
   Ehlers C., 2013, 17 C COMB REL PART Z
   Ehlers C., 2014, THESIS, P136
   Faiola CL, 2015, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V12, P527, DOI 10.5194/bg-12-527-2015
   Fares S, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P2427, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12222
   Fu Y, 2014, TELLUS B, V66, DOI 10.3402/tellusb.v66.24987
   Geiss A, 2017, ATMOS MEAS TECH, V10, P2969, DOI 10.5194/amt-10-2969-2017
   Ghirardo A, 2016, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V16, P2901, DOI 10.5194/acp-16-2901-2016
   Goldstein AH, 2007, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V41, P1514, DOI 10.1021/es072476p
   GUENTHER A, 1995, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V100, P8873, DOI 10.1029/94JD02950
   Guenther A, 2006, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V6, P3181, DOI 10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006
   Isaacman G, 2011, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V11, P5335, DOI 10.5194/acp-11-5335-2011
   Jenkin ME, 2003, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V3, P181, DOI 10.5194/acp-3-181-2003
   Jenkin ME, 1997, ATMOS ENVIRON, V31, P81, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00105-7
   Jimenez JL, 2009, SCIENCE, V326, P1525, DOI 10.1126/science.1180353
   Jud W, 2016, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V16, P277, DOI 10.5194/acp-16-277-2016
   Jud W, 2016, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V39, P1204, DOI 10.1111/pce.12643
   Karlik JF, 2016, ACTA HORTIC, V1108, P255, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1108.33
   Kofahl C.:., 2012, Hochempfindliche Bestimmung der organischen und anorganischen Kohlenstoff-Fraktion in Feinstaubproben mittels CRD-Spektroskopie
   Leal W, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V171, P1140, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.086
   Lelieveld J, 2015, NATURE, V525, P367, DOI 10.1038/nature15371
   Liu HX, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V174, P868, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.139
   Loreto F, 2001, PLANT PHYSIOL, V127, P1781, DOI 10.1104/pp.010497
   Loreto F, 2014, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V103, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.09.005
   Marousek J, 2017, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V19, P311, DOI 10.1007/s10098-016-1284-y
   McPherson EG, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V99, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.011
   PANKOW JF, 1994, ATMOS ENVIRON, V28, P189, DOI 10.1016/1352-2310(94)90094-9
   PANKOW JF, 1994, ATMOS ENVIRON, V28, P185, DOI 10.1016/1352-2310(94)90093-0
   Parrish D. D., 2014, CALNEX 2010 SYNTHESI
   Pincetl S, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V107, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.006
   Pope CA, 2009, NEW ENGL J MED, V360, P376, DOI 10.1056/NEJMsa0805646
   Sander R, 2011, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V4, P373, DOI 10.5194/gmd-4-373-2011
   Sandu A, 2006, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V6, P187, DOI 10.5194/acp-6-187-2006
   Saunders SM, 2003, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V3, P161, DOI 10.5194/acp-3-161-2003
   STEIN SE, 1994, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V34, P581, DOI 10.1021/ci00019a016
   Tiwary A, 2013, ENVIRON POLLUT, V183, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.049
   Tiwary A, 2009, ENVIRON POLLUT, V157, P2645, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.05.005
   von Schneidemesser E., 2017, ATMOS CHEM PHY UNPUB, V37
   Winkler J, 2002, J ATMOS CHEM, V42, P465, DOI 10.1023/A:1015709214016
   Yousefpour R., 2009, THESIS, P180
NR 52
TC 29
Z9 31
U1 5
U2 137
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0959-6526
EI 1879-1786
J9 J CLEAN PROD
JI J. Clean Prod.
PD MAR 1
PY 2018
VL 176
BP 827
EP 841
DI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.164
PG 15
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA FU1ZM
UT WOS:000423648000072
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Schuldt, A
   Hönig, L
   Li, Y
   Fichtner, A
   Härdtle, W
   von Oheimb, G
   Welk, E
   Bruelheide, H
AF Schuldt, Andreas
   Hoenig, Lydia
   Li, Ying
   Fichtner, Andreas
   Haerdtle, Werner
   von Oheimb, Goddert
   Welk, Erik
   Bruelheide, Helge
TI Herbivore and pathogen effects on tree growth are additive, but mediated
   by tree diversity and plant traits
SO ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
LA English
DT Article
DE BEF-China; biodiversity and ecosystem functioning; climatic niche;
   functional traits; fungal pathogens; plant-herbivore interactions
ID RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; FOREST BIODIVERSITY; SPECIES RICHNESS;
   PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY; GEOGRAPHICAL RANGE; 3-WAY INTERACTIONS; INSECT
   HERBIVORES; SAPLING GROWTH; TROPHIC LEVELS; WOODY-PLANTS
AB Herbivores and fungal pathogens are key drivers of plant community composition and functioning. The effects of herbivores and pathogens are mediated by the diversity and functional characteristics of their host plants. However, the combined effects of herbivory and pathogen damage, and their consequences for plant performance, have not yet been addressed in the context of biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research. We analyzed the relationships between herbivory, fungal pathogen damage and their effects on tree growth in a large-scale forest-biodiversity experiment. Moreover, we tested whether variation in leaf trait and climatic niche characteristics among tree species influenced these relationships. We found significant positive effects of herbivory on pathogen damage, and vice versa. These effects were attenuated by tree species richnessbecause herbivory increased and pathogen damage decreased with increasing richnessand were most pronounced for species with soft leaves and narrow climatic niches. However, herbivory and pathogens had contrasting, independent effects on tree growth, with pathogens decreasing and herbivory increasing growth. The positive herbivory effects indicate that trees might be able to (over-)compensate for local damage at the level of the whole tree. Nevertheless, we found a dependence of these effects on richness, leaf traits and climatic niche characteristics of the tree species. This could mean that the ability for compensation is influenced by both biodiversity loss and tree species identityincluding effects of larger-scale climatic adaptations that have been rarely considered in this context. Our results suggest that herbivory and pathogens have additive but contrasting effects on tree growth. Considering effects of both herbivory and pathogens may thus help to better understand the net effects of damage on tree performance in communities differing in diversity. Moreover, our study shows how species richness and species characteristics (leaf traits and climatic niches) can modify tree growth responses to leaf damage under real-world conditions.
C1 [Schuldt, Andreas; von Oheimb, Goddert; Welk, Erik; Bruelheide, Helge] German Ctr Integrat Biodivers Res iDiv, Leipzig, Germany.
   [Schuldt, Andreas; Hoenig, Lydia; Welk, Erik; Bruelheide, Helge] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Biol Geobot & Bot Garden, Halle, Germany.
   [Li, Ying; Fichtner, Andreas; Haerdtle, Werner] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Inst Ecol, Luneburg, Germany.
   [von Oheimb, Goddert] Tech Univ Dresden, Inst Gen Ecol & Environm Protect, Tharandt, Germany.
C3 Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg; Leuphana University Luneburg;
   Technische Universitat Dresden
RP Schuldt, A (corresponding author), German Ctr Integrat Biodivers Res iDiv, Leipzig, Germany.
EM andreas.schuldt@idiv.de
RI Fichtner, Andreas/AAP-3188-2021; WELK, Erik/AGL-4971-2022; Haerdtle,
   Werner/B-2568-2016; Schuldt, Andreas/J-9429-2013; Bruelheide,
   Helge/G-3907-2013; von Oheimb, Goddert/O-9483-2015
OI Hardtle, Werner/0000-0002-5599-5792; Schuldt,
   Andreas/0000-0002-8761-0025; Bruelheide, Helge/0000-0003-3135-0356;
   Fichtner, Andreas/0000-0003-0499-4893; von Oheimb,
   Goddert/0000-0001-7408-425X
FU Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FOR-891]; Sino-German Centre for
   Research Promotion [524, 592, 698, 699, 785, 970, 1020]; German Centre
   for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig [DFG FZT
   118]
FX Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Grant/Award Number: FOR-891;
   Sino-German Centre for Research Promotion, Grant/Award Number: 524, 592,
   698, 699, 785, 970 and 1020; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity
   Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Grant/Award Number: DFG FZT 118
CR Agrawal AA, 2006, ECOLOGY, V87, pS132, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[132:PDS]2.0.CO;2
   [Anonymous], 2004, Model selection and multimodel inference, DOI DOI 10.1007/B97636
   Bagchi R, 2014, NATURE, V506, P85, DOI 10.1038/nature12911
   Barton K., 2016, R package 1.15. 6
   Bever JD, 2015, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V46, P305, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054306
   Biere A, 2013, FUNCT ECOL, V27, P567, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12100
   Brändle M, 2001, J ANIM ECOL, V70, P491, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00506.x
   Bruelheide H, 1999, J ECOL, V87, P839, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00403.x
   Bruelheide H, 2014, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V5, P74, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12126
   Cardinale BJ, 2012, NATURE, V486, P59, DOI 10.1038/nature11148
   Cardoza YJ, 2003, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V32, P220, DOI 10.1603/0046-225X-32.1.220
   Castagneyrol B, 2014, J APPL ECOL, V51, P134, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12175
   Castagneyrol B, 2013, J ECOL, V101, P418, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12055
   COLEY PD, 1985, SCIENCE, V230, P895, DOI 10.1126/science.230.4728.895
   Coley PD, 1996, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V27, P305, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.305
   Dillen M, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V380, P274, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.004
   Eichenberg D, 2015, J ECOL, V103, P1667, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12475
   Eisenhauer N, 2012, BASIC APPL ECOL, V13, P571, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2012.09.002
   Endara MJ, 2011, FUNCT ECOL, V25, P389, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01803.x
   Fichtner A, 2017, ECOL LETT, V20, P892, DOI 10.1111/ele.12786
   Fine PVA, 2004, SCIENCE, V305, P663, DOI 10.1126/science.1098982
   Folgarait PJ, 1995, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V24, P1487, DOI 10.1093/ee/24.6.1487
   Guyot V, 2016, BIOL LETTERS, V12, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2015.1037
   Hantsch L, 2014, J ECOL, V102, P1673, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12317
   Hantsch L, 2013, ECOSPHERE, V4, DOI 10.1890/ES13-00103.1
   HATCHER PE, 1995, BIOL REV, V70, P639, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1995.tb01655.x
   Hauser TP, 2013, FUNCT ECOL, V27, P623, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12053
   Hess C, 2015, FORESTS, V6, P3847, DOI 10.3390/f6113847
   Hines J, 2015, ADV ECOL RES, V53, P161, DOI 10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.09.001
   Hooper DU, 2012, NATURE, V486, P105, DOI 10.1038/nature11118
   Jactel H, 2007, ECOL LETT, V10, P835, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01073.x
   Johnson MTJ, 2016, ECOL ENTOMOL, V41, P112, DOI 10.1111/een.12280
   Kambach S, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0165815
   Kluth S, 2002, OECOLOGIA, V133, P193, DOI 10.1007/s00442-002-1016-3
   Kröber W, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0109211
   Kuznetsova A., 2016, lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models
   Lefcheck JS, 2015, NAT COMMUN, V6, DOI 10.1038/ncomms7936
   Lefcheck JS, 2013, ECOLOGY, V94, P565, DOI 10.1890/12-0192.1
   Levine JM, 2009, NATURE, V461, P254, DOI 10.1038/nature08251
   Lewinsohn TM, 2005, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V36, P597, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175520
   Li Y, 2017, J PLANT ECOL, V10, P136, DOI 10.1093/jpe/rtw041
   Li Y, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V327, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.039
   Maron JL, 2006, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V273, P2575, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2006.3587
   Massad TJ, 2013, OECOLOGIA, V172, P1, DOI 10.1007/s00442-012-2470-1
   Miller ZJ, 2012, AM NAT, V179, P282, DOI 10.1086/663676
   Naeem S, 2012, SCIENCE, V336, P1401, DOI 10.1126/science.1215855
   Nakagawa S, 2013, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V4, P133, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
   Nguyen D, 2016, ECOL EVOL, V6, P2426, DOI 10.1002/ece3.2056
   Nykänen H, 2004, OIKOS, V104, P247, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12768.x
   Paine CET, 2012, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V3, P245, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00155.x
   Pérez-Harguindeguy N, 2013, AUST J BOT, V61, P167, DOI 10.1071/BT12225
   Pérez-Harguindeguy N, 2003, AUSTRAL ECOL, V28, P642, DOI 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01321.x
   Plath M, 2012, OECOLOGIA, V169, P477, DOI 10.1007/s00442-011-2215-6
   Poorter L, 2004, PLANT BIOLOGY, V6, P746, DOI 10.1055/s-2004-821269
   Reich PB, 2012, SCIENCE, V336, P589, DOI 10.1126/science.1217909
   ROOT RB, 1973, ECOL MONOGR, V43, P95, DOI 10.2307/1942161
   Rottstock T, 2014, ECOLOGY, V95, P1907, DOI 10.1890/13-2317.1
   Schowalter T. D., 2012, Journal of Sustainable Forestry, V31, P518, DOI 10.1080/10549811.2011.636225
   Schuldt A, 2015, J ECOL, V103, P563, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12396
   Schuldt A, 2014, NEW PHYTOL, V202, P864, DOI 10.1111/nph.12695
   Schuldt A, 2012, ECOL LETT, V15, P732, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01792.x
   Schuldt A, 2010, J ECOL, V98, P917, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01659.x
   Scriber JM, 2010, INSECT SCI, V17, P471, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2010.01357.x
   Setiawan NN, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V334, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.08.032
   Slatyer RA, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P1104, DOI 10.1111/ele.12140
   Soliveres S, 2016, NATURE, V536, P456, DOI 10.1038/nature19092
   Spoel SH, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P18842, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0708139104
   Stout MJ, 2006, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V51, P663, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151117
   Tack AJM, 2013, FUNCT ECOL, V27, P633, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12087
   Terborgh J, 2012, AM NAT, V179, P303, DOI 10.1086/664183
   Thaler JS, 2012, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V17, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.02.010
   van Mölken T, 2014, OECOLOGIA, V175, P589, DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-2928-4
   Wise MJ, 2007, AM NAT, V169, P443, DOI 10.1086/512044
   Yang XF, 2013, EUR J FOREST RES, V132, P593, DOI 10.1007/s10342-013-0696-z
   Zhang JY, 2017, OECOLOGIA, V183, P455, DOI 10.1007/s00442-016-3769-0
NR 75
TC 36
Z9 39
U1 2
U2 65
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 2045-7758
J9 ECOL EVOL
JI Ecol. Evol.
PD SEP
PY 2017
VL 7
IS 18
BP 7462
EP 7474
DI 10.1002/ece3.3292
PG 13
WC Ecology; Evolutionary Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Evolutionary Biology
GA FH7DD
UT WOS:000411341800027
PM 28944031
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sommer, R
   Benecke, N
AF Sommer, R
   Benecke, N
TI Late-Pleistocene and early Holocene history of the canid fauna of Europe
   (Canidae)
SO MAMMALIAN BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Vulpes; Canis; Alopex; Glacial refuge
ID QUATERNARY; WOLF
AB In the sub-fossil assemblages of Europe the red fox is clearly the most frequent carnivorous mammalian species with a total of 1553 records. In depositions from the Weichselian Glacial the red fox Vulpes vulpes is, a typical representative of the Holocene fauna, already recorded in 100 assemblages. The Iberian peninsula, Italian peninsula and Balkans were theorised as glacial refugia. Well-founded facts give reason to believe that V vulpes was also distributed in the Carpathian refuge. Later on, the Crimean peninsula would also appear to be a possible glacial refuge of the red fox. In the last warmer complex of interstadials during the Pleni-Glacial (Hengelo-Denekamp, 38,000-25,000 BC) the red fox was distributed in central Europe. Its distribution during this epoch extended at least in part to southern England. The earliest well-dated records of V vulpes in central Europe after the Maximum Glaciation lie between 14,000 and 13,500 BC. Already during the early Late-Glacial (13,500 BC) the red fox appeared in typical glacial faunal communities. A separation to glacial refugia was only possible for 10,000 years.
   During the last warmer Pleni-Glacial complex of interstadials (38,000-25,000 BC) in central Europe a sympatric distribution of the arctic fox (Alopex tagopus) and the red fox probably existed. During the Last Glacial Maximum (22,000-18,000 BC) the arctic fox was exclusively distributed in central Europe, outside of the refuges. The combined distribution of A. lagopus and V vulpes during the Late-Glacial (15,000-9500 BC) in central Europe, with the probable exception of the Allerod, is precisely documented by sub-fossil assemblages.
   In the Pleni-Glacial the wolf Canis lupus was distributed in geographic regions that served as glacial refugia of more warm-climate adapted species. Concerning the wolf no drastic decrease of the distribution is assumed. The Holocene presence of C. lupus is probably not caused by recolonisation. (C) 2005 Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Saugetierkunde. Published by Elsevier Gmbh. All rights reserved.
C1 Univ Rostock, Inst Biosci, D-18055 Rostock, Germany.
   German Archaeol Inst, Eurasia Sect, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.
C3 University of Rostock
RP Univ Rostock, Inst Biosci, Univ Pl 2, D-18055 Rostock, Germany.
EM robert.sommer@uni-rostock.de
CR Altuna J., 1986, Archeologie des Pyrenees Occidentales, V6, P53
   Altuna J., 1972, Munibe, V24, P1
   Altuna J., 1991, Archaeozoologia, V4, P87
   ALTUNA J, 1973, CUEVA CASARES, P97
   ALTUNA J, 1984, OCUPACIONES PALEOTIC, P149
   ALTUNA J., 1983, KOBIE, VXIII, P141
   [Anonymous], 1997, Rem. Sens
   [Anonymous], MONOGRAFIE NATURA BR
   [Anonymous], COURIER FORSCHUNGSIN
   [Anonymous], 1986, ANTROPOLOGICAL RES P
   [Anonymous], 1995, Przeglad Archeologiczny
   [Anonymous], MONOGRAPHIEN ROMISCH
   [Anonymous], 1996, ARCHAEOMETRY, DOI [10.1111/j.1475-4754.1996.tb00785.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1475-4754.1996.TB00785.X]
   [Anonymous], OBRE 1 2 NEOLITHIC S
   Baales M., 2002, MONOGRAPHIEN ROMISCH, V51, P1
   BAALES M, 1994, ARCHAOL KORRESPONDEN, V24, P241
   BATE DMA, 1928, J R ANTHR I GREAT BR, V58, P33
   Benecke N., 1990, Altenburger Naturwissenschaftliche Forschungen, V5, P231
   Benecke N., 1999, ARCHAOLOGIE EURASIEN, V6, P151
   BENECKE N, 1999, ARCHAOLOGIE EURASIEN, V6, P43
   BERKE H, 1987, JUNGPALAOLITHISCH FR, V23, P303
   Bibikova V. I., 1963, Prirodnaya Obst Fauny Proshlogo, VNo. 1, P119
   BIBIKOVA VI, 1970, KIEV NAUKOVA DUMKA, P97
   Bokonyi S., 1992, Cultural and Landscape Changes in South-East Hungary I Reports on the Gyomaendrod Project, P195
   BOKONYI S, 1997, OSTERREICHISCH BULGA, P385
   Bokonyi Sandor., 1992, ACTA PRAEHISTORICA A, V24, P245
   Bolomey A., 1973, Dacia, V17, P41
   Bouchud P, 1953, BULL SOC PREHIST FR, V50, P444, DOI 10.3406/bspf.1953.5155
   Bouchud P, 1953, BULL SOC PREHIST FR, V50, P170, DOI 10.3406/bspf.1953.3020
   Bratlund Bodil, 1999, P39
   CALKIN VI, 1972, T MOSKOVSKOGO OBSCES, V48, P66
   Clot A., 1984, Munibe, V36, P33
   CLUTTONBROCK J, 1979, INVESTIGATIONS ORKNE, V38, P112
   CORRIDI C, 1990, STUDI ETRUSCHI, V55, P227
   Currant A, 2001, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V20, P1707, DOI 10.1016/S0277-3791(01)00035-X
   DAVID AI, 1999, ARCHAOLOGIE EURASIEN, V6, P59
   David Anatolie, 2003, Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, V46, P85
   Davis S., 1984, Fouilles recentes a Khirokitia (Chypre) 1977-1981, P147
   DAVIS S.J.M., 1989, FOUILLES R CENTES KH, P189
   Degerbol M., 1933, Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening i Kjobenhavn, V96, P357
   FORSTEN A, 1972, FINSKT MUSEUM 1972, P74
   Frati F, 1998, J ZOOL, V245, P43, DOI 10.1017/S0952836998005056
   Hewitt G, 2000, NATURE, V405, P907, DOI 10.1038/35016000
   Hewitt GM, 1999, BIOL J LINN SOC, V68, P87, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01160.x
   HOCK C, 2000, WEIMARER MONOGRAFIEN, V35, P1
   JONSSON L, 1988, ACTA REGIAE SOC HUMA, V79, P56
   Jullien R., 1981, La Grotte Prehistorique de Kitsos (Attique), P569
   Jullien R., 1973, B CORRESP HELLENIQUE, V97, P434
   Kahlke R.-D., 1999, HIST ORIGIN EVOLUTIO
   KLEIN R, 1994, MUSEO CTR INVESTIGAC, V17, P141
   KRAKHMALNAYA TV, 1999, ARCHAOLOGIE EURASIEN, V6, P223
   KURTEN B, 1988, Memoranda Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica, V64, P35
   Kurten B., 1968, PLEISTOCENE MAMMALS
   Kuzmina I.E., 1988, Archaeological Cultures of the Northern Caspian Region, P173
   LENTACKER A, 1994, OFFA, V51, P284
   LILJEGREN R, 1975, U LUND DEP QUATERNAR, V8, P1
   LOUGAS L, 1997, THESIS U TARTY ESTON
   MARRIEZKURRENA K, 1989, TRABAJOS ARQUEOLOGIA, V8, P237
   McCormick Finbar, 1999, P355
   MUNZEL S, 2001, ARCHAEOLOGISCHES KOR, V31, P317
   Musil R., 1980, WEIMARER MONOGRAPHIE, V3, P5
   Nadachowski Adam, 1993, Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, V36, P281
   Petrenko A.G., 1995, NEOLIT ENEOLIT JUGA, P205
   PIPERNO M, 1989, QUATERNARIA, V22, P275
   Reisch L., 1976, ARCH OLOGISCHES KORR, V6, P261
   RENOUF MAP, 1989, BRIT ARCHAEOLOGICAL, V487, P1
   Sommer R, 2004, MAMMAL REV, V34, P249, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2004.00043.x
   SOMMER R, 2004, THESIS U ROSTOCK
   STAMPFLI HR, 1983, ACAD HELVETICA, V4, P37
   Terberger T, 2002, ANTIQUITY, V76, P691, DOI 10.1017/S0003598X00091134
   TOZZI C, 1971, RIV SCI PREISTORICHE, V26, P213
   Tranier M., 1973, Bulletin Correspondance Hellenique, V97, P528
   Vilà C, 1999, MOL ECOL, V8, P2089, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00825.x
   Von Koenigswald W., 1999, KAUPIA, V9, P53
   VONKNORRE D, 1980, WEIMARER MONOGRAPHIE, V3, P60
   Wagner E., 1983, Das Mittelpalaolithikum der Grossen Grotte bei Blaubeuren (Alb-Donau- Kreis)
   WAYNE RK, 1992, CONSERV BIOL, V6, P559, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06040559.x
   WOLSAN M, 1993, ANTHROPOLOGIE, V97, P203
   Woodman P, 1997, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V16, P129, DOI 10.1016/S0277-3791(96)00037-6
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
NR 81
TC 83
Z9 93
U1 0
U2 34
PU SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
PI HEIDELBERG
PA TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
SN 1616-5047
EI 1618-1476
J9 MAMM BIOL
JI Mamm. Biol.
PY 2005
VL 70
IS 4
BP 227
EP 241
DI 10.1016/j.mambio.2004.12.001
PG 15
WC Zoology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Zoology
GA 952PA
UT WOS:000231016800004
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Nsibambi, F
   Akiiki, AA
AF Nsibambi, Fredrick
   Akiiki, Aliguma Ahabyona
TI Indigenous knowledge for climate action at the Ekyisalhalha kya Karoro
   sacred site, adjacent to Rwenzori mountains national park in Kasese
SO JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; Indigenous knowledge; Natural disasters; Cultural
   leaders; Mitigation; Knowledge bearers; Ritual cleansing; Indigenous
   minority communities; Ekisalhalha kya Kororo; Kasese Uganda
AB Purpose - This case study examines the contribution of Indigenous knowledge (IK) and practices to climate action at Ekisalhalha kya Kororo sacred site, adjacent to Rwenzori Mountains National Park in the Kasese district of Western Uganda. This paper is intended to make a case for IK as an important component of climate change mitigation strategies especially if the knowledge is profiled and publicised. The paper presents aspects of traditional knowledge in terms of ceremonies, rituals, norms and customs that can be re-energised for climate change. Design/methodology/approach - The authors employed mainly a participatory and qualitative data collection methodology. The data were collected in Kasese district largely from the local government officials, cultural leaders, civil society actors and representatives of indigenous minority communities such as the Basongora. Data were collected from both primary and secondary sources, at the desk and through community interactions to collect various narratives based on IK. Primary data were collected during individual interviews, by administering a semi-structured questionnaire and holding focus group discussions with different stakeholders in Kasese, Uganda. The respondents were carefully identified and included cultural leaders, young people, local government authorities and representatives of civil society organisations responsible for implementing climate change mitigation strategies. Findings - Climate change effects are manifest in rising temperatures, flooding, desertification and other natural hazards. The Kasese district, in particular, has faced several climatic change catastrophes and there has been limited use or mainstreaming of the existing IK of the communities in the region in different climate action interventions. Amongst the key research findings was that IK can be utilised to address or mitigate climate change risks/hazards and provide valuable insights into climate adaptation strategies, including rain-water harvesting, weather forecasting and preparedness, and sustainable farming practices. In addition, it is easily accessible, especially in areas that modern science has not reached. Research limitations/implications - Few elders with IK related to climate change mitigation and the disconnect between young people and IK bearers were limitations encountered during data collection. Originality/value - The information in the article is an original compilation by the authors based on previous published work from the NetZero Heritage for Climate Action research project.
C1 [Nsibambi, Fredrick; Akiiki, Aliguma Ahabyona] CCFU, Kampala, Uganda.
RP Nsibambi, F (corresponding author), CCFU, Kampala, Uganda.
EM fredricknsibambi@yahoo.com; ccfu@crossculturalfoundation.or.ug
NR 0
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 2
PU EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
PI Leeds
PA Floor 5, Northspring 21-23 Wellington Street, Leeds, W YORKSHIRE,
   ENGLAND
SN 2044-1266
EI 2044-1274
J9 J CULT HERIT MANAG S
JI J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev.
PD NOV 1
PY 2024
VL 14
IS 5
SI SI
BP 798
EP 801
DI 10.1108/JCHMSD-05-2024-0111
EA OCT 2024
PG 4
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA K8P6R
UT WOS:001325206000001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Absalan, F
   Hatam, F
   Prévost, M
   Barbeau, B
   Bichai, F
AF Absalan, Faezeh
   Hatam, Fatemeh
   Prevost, Michele
   Barbeau, Benoit
   Bichai, Francoise
TI Climate change and future water demand: Implications for chlorine and
   trihalomethanes management in water distribution systems
SO JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Water distribution network; Climatic events; Water conservation; Water
   quality modeling; Disinfection by-product; Water quality management
ID DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS
AB The global change in surface water quality calls for increased preparedness of drinking water utilities. The increasing frequency of extreme climatic events combined with global warming can impact source and treated water characteristics such as temperature and natural organic matter. On the other hand, water saving policies in response to water and energy crisis in some countries can aggravate the situation by increasing the water residence time in the drinking water distribution system (DWDS). This study investigates the individual and combined effect of increased dissolved organic carbon (DOC), increased temperature, and reduced water demand on fate and transport of chlorine and trihalomethanes (THMs) within a full-scale DWDS in Canada. Chlorine and THM prediction models were calibrated with laboratory experiments and implemented in EPANET-MATLAB toolkit for prediction in the DWDS under different combinations of DOC, temperature, and demand. The duration of low chlorine residuals (<0.2 mg/L) and high THM (>80 mu g/L) periods within a day in each scenario was reported using a reliability index. Low-reliability zones prone to microbial regrowth or high THM exposure were then delineated geographically on the city DWDS. Results revealed that water demand reduction primarily affects chlorine availability, with less concern for THM formation. The reduction in nodal chlorine reliability was gradual with rising temperature and DOC of the treated water and reducing water demand. Nodal THM reliability remained unchanged until certain thresholds were reached, i.e., temperature >25 degrees C for waters with DOC <1.52 mg/L, and DOC >2.2 mg/L for waters with temperature = 17 degrees C. At these critical thresholds, an abrupt network-wide THM exceedance of 80 mu g/L occurred. Under higher DOC and temperature levels in future, employing the proposed approach revealed that increasing the applied chlorine dosage (which is a conventional method used to ensure sufficient chlorine coverage) results in elevated exposure toTHMs and is not recommended. This approach aids water utilities in assessing the effectiveness of different intervention measures to solve water quality problems, identify site-specific thresholds leading to major decreases in system reliability, and integrate climate adaptation into water safety management.
C1 [Absalan, Faezeh; Hatam, Fatemeh; Barbeau, Benoit] Drinking Water Chair, Succ Ctr Ville, Dept Civil Geol & Mining Engn, CP 6079, Montreal, PQ H3C 3A7, Canada.
RP Absalan, F (corresponding author), Drinking Water Chair, Succ Ctr Ville, Dept Civil Geol & Mining Engn, CP 6079, Montreal, PQ H3C 3A7, Canada.
EM Faezeh.absalan@polymtl.ca; Fatemeh-2.hatam@polymtl.ca;
   Michele.prevost@polymtl.ca; Benoit.barbeau@polymtl.ca;
   Fbichai@polymtl.ca
RI prevost, michele/HOC-8215-2023; Bichai, Francoise/GSN-3525-2022;
   Barbeau, Benoit/A-1174-2010
OI Barbeau, Benoit/0000-0002-4108-8155
FU Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
   Discovery Grant of the last author (Bichai); NSERC [ALLRP 545363-19]
FX This research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering
   Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant of the last author
   (Bichai) , Polytechnique Montreal's partial doctoral scholarships, and
   the NSERC grant, ALLRP 545363-19, from the Industrial Chair on Drinking
   Water, Canada.
CR Abokifa AA, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12041033
   Absalan F, 2023, Water Quality Management in Chlorinated Distribution Systems under Changing Climate and Demand Patterns, Civil and Environmental Engineering
   Absalan F, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14223685
   Agudelo-Vera C, 2016, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000658
   Albanakis C, 2021, J WATER PROCESS ENG, V43, DOI 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102252
   Alexander C, 2021, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102265
   Anderson LE, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V858, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159699
   [Anonymous], 2010, Long term 2 enhanced surface water treatment rule toolbox guidance manual, P380
   [Anonymous], 2015, United Nations Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
   Asif Z, 2023, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V37, P2771, DOI 10.1007/s11269-023-03474-4
   Avvedimento S, 2020, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V146, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001254
   Bond T, 2014, J HAZARD MATER, V278, P288, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.100
   Bondank EN, 2018, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V52, P9605, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.7b01591
   Chow AT, 2019, J ENVIRON QUAL, V48, P1826, DOI 10.2134/jeq2019.04.0172
   Cissé G, 2019, ACTA TROP, V194, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.03.012
   Clark RM, 2001, J ENVIRON ENG-ASCE, V127, P493, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2001)127:6(493)
   Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 2010, National Primary Drinking Water Regulations, Subpart H-Filtration and Disinfection, Disinfection, P456
   Cool G, 2019, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.07.004
   Crandall T, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0257733
   Dias VCF, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11030627
   Dion-Fortier A, 2009, WATER RES, V43, P3057, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2009.04.019
   Donohue MJ, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V774, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145142
   Dowdell KS, 2023, ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES, V9, P2847, DOI 10.1039/d3ew00278k
   Eliades D.G., 2016, Proc. 14th International Conference on Computing and Control for the Water Industry (CCWI), P1
   Ferretto A, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V300, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113688
   Golea DM, 2017, WATER RES, V112, P226, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.051
   Hatam F, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13182579
   Hogue D, 2023, ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES, V9, P2745, DOI [10.1039/D3EW00308F, 10.1039/d3ew00308f]
   Hohner AK, 2019, AWWA WATER SCI, V1, DOI 10.1002/aws2.1155
   Hohner AK, 2017, ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES, V3, P352, DOI [10.1039/c6ew00247a, 10.1039/C6EW00247A]
   Hrudey SE, 2009, WATER RES, V43, P2057, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2009.02.011
   Khan F, 2021, J WATER PROCESS ENG, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102165
   Leveque B, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102656
   Liu JL, 2022, CHEMOSPHERE, V288, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132541
   Liu S, 2020, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V193, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103289
   Mian HR, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V325, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116537
   Ministere du Developpement durable de l'Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques (MDDELCC), 2018, Strategie quebecoise de l'eau 2018-2030, P80
   Mosaferi M, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P8168, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-11063-w
   Olefeldt D, 2013, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V10, P6247, DOI 10.5194/bg-10-6247-2013
   Revchuk AD, 2014, WATER ENVIRON RES, V86, P372, DOI 10.2175/106143013X13736496909671
   Rice E.W., 2012, STANDARD METHODS EXA, V22nd
   Rodriquez MJ, 2004, WATER RES, V38, P4367, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2004.08.018
   Sathasivan A, 2020, WATER RES, V184, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116189
   Seidel CJ, 2005, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V97, P87
   Semenza JC, 2020, NAT IMMUNOL, V21, P484, DOI 10.1038/s41590-020-0631-7
   Sham C.H., 2013, Effects of Wildfire on Drinking Water Utilities and Best Practices for Wildfire Risk Reduction and Mitigation
   Statistics Canada, 2019, Survey of Drinking Water Plants
   Summers RS, 1996, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V88, P80
   Tanaka SK, 2006, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V76, P361, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9079-5
   Tsitsifli S, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12051422
   United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1999, EPA 815-R-99-015
   United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2023, Strategies for Climate Change Adaptation
   Uyak V, 2007, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V378, P269, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.02.041
   Valdivia-Garcia M, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-46238-0
   Walski T., 2019, World Water Modeling, V35, P2
   Xu ZQ, 2022, CHEMOSPHERE, V286, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131586
   Zhang CQ, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V770, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145356
   Zhou WQ, 2017, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V195, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.043
   Zou XY, 2023, NAT HAZARDS, V115, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05548-9
NR 59
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 4
U2 12
PU ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI LONDON
PA 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON NW1 7DX, ENGLAND
SN 0301-4797
EI 1095-8630
J9 J ENVIRON MANAGE
JI J. Environ. Manage.
PD MAR
PY 2024
VL 355
AR 120470
DI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120470
EA FEB 2024
PG 11
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA NF7Q1
UT WOS:001199107100001
PM 38422852
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wittke, M
   Baumgart, L
   Menzel, F
AF Wittke, Marti
   Baumgart, Lucas
   Menzel, Florian
TI Acclimation in ants: Interference of communication and waterproofing
   through cuticular hydrocarbons in a multifunctional trait
SO FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE acclimation; aggression; climate adaptation; cuticular hydrocarbons;
   Formicidae; nestmate recognition
ID NESTMATE RECOGNITION; HYMENOPTERA-FORMICIDAE; EVOLUTION; DISCRIMINATION;
   PERMEABILITY; DIVERSITY; SELECTION; ECOLOGY; INSECT; CUES
AB Organismal traits may experience conflicting selection pressures if they fulfil different functions simultaneously. This can require trade-offs between functions or alternatively functional separation between elements of the trait. An important multifunctional trait in insects is the cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) layer. CHCs cover the body of nearly all insects, protect against desiccation and serve as a communication signal. In social insects like ants, they provide cues for nestmate recognition. To maintain their waterproofing function, insects have to adjust CHC composition to current temperatures. These changes might affect information content and interfere with communication, which would be especially detrimental in social insects. Here, we studied how acclimation affects nestmate recognition in two sister species of the ant genus Lasius. Colony fragments were exposed to three climate regimes. We analysed behaviour towards same and differently acclimated conspecifics, and determined which CHCs were related to acclimatory changes, colony differences and inter-individual aggression. Differential acclimation led to higher aggression and chemical distances among former nestmates. We identified small CHC subsets, which only differed among colonies or among acclimation treatments. Moreover, few compounds sufficed to explain inter-individual aggression, suggesting that ants do not use the entire CHC profile for nestmate recognition and that colony identity is encoded in a redundant way. Across individual CHCs, their contribution to colony differences and to differences among acclimatory treatments was negatively correlated, indicating that there is some degree of functional separation. However, CHC classes could not be clearly assigned to one or another function, indicating that the role of each CHC is idiosyncratic and may differ among species. Acclimatory effects and colony differences were more independent from each other in L. platythorax than in L. niger, indicating that functional separation can differ even among sister species. Our results show that CHC functions are more intertwined than previously assumed, suggesting that insects cannot optimise all functions independently. The main constraint might be the need to maintain a certain phase behaviour of the CHC layer, which depends on CHC composition and affects functionality. The need to separate functions might depend on species-specific ecological and life-history parameters. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
C1 [Wittke, Marti; Baumgart, Lucas; Menzel, Florian] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Organism & Mol Evolut IomE, Mainz, Germany.
   [Baumgart, Lucas] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Biol 2, Aachen, Germany.
C3 Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz; RWTH Aachen University
RP Menzel, F (corresponding author), Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Organism & Mol Evolut IomE, Mainz, Germany.
EM menzelf@uni-mainz.de
RI ; Menzel, Florian/H-2436-2017
OI Baumgart, Lucas/0000-0003-1006-0659; Menzel, Florian/0000-0002-9673-3668
FU Heisenberg fellowship of the German Research Foundation (DFG) [ME
   3842/6-1]; Projekt DEAL
FX We thank the Struktur- und Genehmigungsdirektion Sud (Rheinland-Pfalz)
   and the Forstamt Ober-Olmer Wald for permission to collect ants in the
   Ober-Olmer Forest (permission no. 42/553-254/287-19). This work was
   funded by a Heisenberg fellowship of the German Research Foundation (DFG
   grant no. ME 3842/6-1). Open Access funding enabled and organized by
   Projekt DEAL.
CR Bates D, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V67, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Baumgart L., 2022, J EXP BIOL
   Blomquist GJ, 2021, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V66, P45, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ento-031620-071754
   Breiman L., 2001, Machine Learning, V45, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1010933404324
   d'Ettorre P, 2010, ANT ECOLOGY, P194
   Dahbi A, 1998, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V42, P349, DOI 10.1007/s002650050447
   Dietemann V, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P10341, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1834281100
   Foitzik S, 2007, ANIM BEHAV, V73, P999, DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.07.017
   Friedman NR, 2019, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V286, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2019.2474
   Frizzi F, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0137919
   Gibbs AG, 1998, AM ZOOL, V38, P471
   Gibbs AG, 2002, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V48, P391, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1910(02)00059-8
   Gibbs AG, 2010, INSECT HYDROCARBONS: BIOLOGY, BIOCHEMISTRY, AND CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, P100, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511711909.007
   Guerrieri FJ, 2009, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V276, P2461, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2008.1860
   Hadley N. F., 1994, WATER RELATIONS TERR
   Jongepier E, 2016, BEHAV ECOL, V27, P304, DOI 10.1093/beheco/arv153
   Junker RR, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V220, P739, DOI 10.1111/nph.14505
   Junker RR, 2016, SIGNAL COMMUN PLANTS, P257, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-33498-1_11
   Lahav S, 1999, NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, V86, P246, DOI 10.1007/s001140050609
   Lenth RV, 2016, J STAT SOFTW, V69, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v069.i01
   Leonhardt SD, 2016, CELL, V164, P1277, DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.035
   Liang D, 2000, NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, V87, P412, DOI 10.1007/s001140050752
   Martin SJ, 2008, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V275, P1271, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2007.1708
   Martin SJ, 2012, BEHAV GENET, V42, P323, DOI 10.1007/s10519-011-9503-0
   Martin SJ, 2009, J CHEM ECOL, V35, P368, DOI 10.1007/s10886-009-9612-x
   Menzel F, 2017, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V30, P1372, DOI 10.1111/jeb.13115
   Menzel F, 2019, J EXP BIOL, V222, DOI 10.1242/jeb.210807
   Menzel F, 2018, FUNCT ECOL, V32, P657, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13008
   Menzel F, 2008, FRONT ZOOL, V5, DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-5-16
   Morrison WR, 2011, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V24, P2389, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02364.x
   Otte T, 2018, J CHEM ECOL, V44, P235, DOI 10.1007/s10886-018-0934-4
   Otte T, 2015, J CHEM ECOL, V41, P32, DOI 10.1007/s10886-014-0535-9
   Pamminger T, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0079616
   Rosell JA, 2019, INTEGR COMP BIOL, V59, P535, DOI 10.1093/icb/icz057
   Rourke BC, 1999, J EXP BIOL, V202, P3255
   Seifert B., 2007, Die Ameisen Mittel- und Nordeuropas, P368
   Sprenger PP, 2020, MYRMECOL NEWS, V30, P1, DOI 10.25849/myrmecol.news_030:001
   Sprenger PP, 2018, J EXP BIOL, V221, DOI 10.1242/jeb.171488
   Steiger Sandra, 2014, Insects, V5, P423, DOI 10.3390/insects5020423
   Sturgis SJ, 2012, MYRMECOL NEWS, V16, P101
   Tanner CJ, 2009, ANIM BEHAV, V77, P297, DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.10.016
   van Zweden JS, 2010, INSECT HYDROCARBONS: BIOLOGY, BIOCHEMISTRY, AND CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, P222, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511711909.012
   van Zweden JS, 2009, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V55, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.11.001
   Wagner D, 2001, J CHEM ECOL, V27, P1805, DOI 10.1023/A:1010408725464
   Wagner D, 1998, J CHEM ECOL, V24, P2021, DOI 10.1023/A:1020781508889
   Wainwright PC, 2007, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V38, P381, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095706
   ZAHAVI A, 1975, J THEOR BIOL, V53, P205, DOI 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3
NR 47
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 1
U2 8
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0269-8463
EI 1365-2435
J9 FUNCT ECOL
JI Funct. Ecol.
PD AUG
PY 2022
VL 36
IS 8
BP 1973
EP 1985
DI 10.1111/1365-2435.14104
EA JUL 2022
PG 13
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 3M2YA
UT WOS:000825464200001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Mátyás, C
AF Matyas, Csaba
TI Adaptive pattern of phenotypic plasticity and inherent growth reveal the
   potential for assisted transfer in sessile oak <i>(Quercus petraea</i>
   L.)
SO FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptation; Climate change; Phenotypic plasticity; Resilience; Inherent
   growth potential; Trade-off; Provenance test; Trailing edge; Xeric limit
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; PLANT-RESPONSES; TEMPERATURE; POPULATIONS; BOREAL
AB Based on data published by S ' aenz-Romero et al. (Adaptive and plastic responses of Quercus petraea populations to climate across Europe, 2017), an alternative reanalysis of a continent-wide common garden experiment (provenance test) of sessile oak was performed. Population mean heights were analyzed with a focus on responses to drought and high summer temperatures projected for the future. The main aim was to assess the adaptive capacity of populations in the critical drying and warming domain of the distribution. A unilateral approach was applied to calculate response regressions (reaction norms) of individual populations. Regression parameters served to investigate the changing balance of growth potential, phenotypic plasticity and resilience among populations of different provenance.
   Among the reanalysis results, the most striking was the flat, quasi-linear response in the dry-warm niche domain reaching beyond the mimicked "local" conditions. Consequently, at climates equivalent to the population origins no maxima were found. Populations from humid-cool climates displayed higher climate sensitivity (plasticity) to changes toward drier and warmer climates. Populations of dry-warm provenance have shown higher resilience under changing climate. Inherent height growth potential of populations in climates similar to that at their origin ("virtual height") diminished significantly with increasing aridity at provenance. Growth potential and resilience revealed a selection trade-off among populations and both appeared as traits under climatic (adaptive) selection.
   Thus, assisted transfer of sessile oak populations may improve resilience; however, at the expense of lower growth potential. This cautions against mixing differently adapted populations in artificial regenerations. The use of local provenances as a recommended adaptive measure indicates limited relevance for sessile oak.
   The present generation of forest trees meets the predicted rapid climate/habitat shifts in its lifetime. Therefore, phenotypic plasticity and resilience will play a central role in sustaining the fitness of extant populations. To determine these traits independently from local site effects, common garden data cannot be neglected and are worth reanalyzing. Notably, provenance tests provide real-time field information on the performance of populations in new climatic environments, applicable for assisted transfer initiatives.
C1 [Matyas, Csaba] Univ Sopron, Inst Environm & Geosci, Sopron, Hungary.
   [Matyas, Csaba] NEESPI Reg Focus Res Ctr Nonboreal Eastern Europe, Pob 132, H-9401 Sopron, Hungary.
C3 University of West Hungary
RP Mátyás, C (corresponding author), Univ Sopron, Inst Environm & Geosci, Sopron, Hungary.; Mátyás, C (corresponding author), NEESPI Reg Focus Res Ctr Nonboreal Eastern Europe, Pob 132, H-9401 Sopron, Hungary.
EM matyas.csaba@uni-sopron.hu
FU European Union [289119]; Hungary-EU [VKSZ_12-1-2013-0034-Agrarklima.2]
FX the study was partly funded by the joint European Union project "Towards
   the sustainable management for forest genetic resources in Europe"
   (FORGER grant 289119; Matyas et al., 2018a), and was further financed by
   the joint Hungary-EU research project
   "VKSZ_12-1-2013-0034-Agrarklima.2".
CR Adams HD, 2017, NAT ECOL EVOL, V1, P1285, DOI 10.1038/s41559-017-0248-x
   Agramont A.R., 2020, RECENT EVIDENCE
   Alberto FJ, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P1645, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12181
   Allen CD, 2015, ECOSPHERE, V6, DOI 10.1890/ES15-00203.1
   Allen CD, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P660, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001
   [Anonymous], ANN FOREST SCI, V66, P800, DOI [10.1051/forest/2009081, DOI 10.1051/FOREST/2009081]
   [Anonymous], P WFGA IUFRO S OL WA, P1
   [Anonymous], GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P1645, DOI [10.1111/gcb.12181, DOI 10.1111/GCB.12181]
   [Anonymous], NEW PHYTOL, DOI [10.1111/nph.16162, DOI 10.1111/NPH.16162]
   [Anonymous], Annual Review of Neuroscience, V5, P387, DOI [DOI 10.1146/ANNUREV, 10.1146/annurev-, 10.1146/annurev]
   [Anonymous], HUNGARIAN ENGLISH SU
   [Anonymous], AM J MED SCI, DOI [DOI 10.1007/s11270-007-9372-6, DOI 10.1016/J.AMJMS.2021.03.001,00089-6]
   [Anonymous], 2015, CLIMATIC THREATS DET
   [Anonymous], PHYSIOL, V14, P797, DOI [10.1093/treephys/14.7-8-9.797, DOI 10.1093/TREEPHYS/14.7-8-9.797]
   [Anonymous], 1996, Climatic adaptation of trees: Rediscovering provenance tests.
   [Anonymous], SILVAE GENET, V41, P370
   [Anonymous], AGR FOREST METEOROL, V294, DOI [10.1016/j, DOI 10.1016/J]
   [Anonymous], FORGER POLICY BRIEF, V4, P4, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.1.3485.8009, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.3485.8009]
   [Anonymous], 1969, P 10 SO FOR TREE IMP
   [Anonymous], TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V24, P694
   [Anonymous], CAN J FOREST RES, V50, P843, DOI [10.1139/cjfr-2019-0329, DOI 10.1139/CJFR-2019-0329]
   [Anonymous], EUPHYTICA, V92, P45
   [Anonymous], FOREST ECOL MANAG, V414, P15
   [Anonymous], IDOJARAS, V115, P205
   [Anonymous], PROJECT RES REPORT H, P131
   [Anonymous], PEER J, V7, pE6213, DOI [10.7717/peerj.6213, DOI 10.7717/PEERJ.6213]
   [Anonymous], ACTA SILVATICA LIGNA, V2, P33
   [Anonymous], ERDESZETTUD KOZL, V8, P1
   Arnold PA, 2019, PHILOS T R SOC B, V374, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2018.0185
   Arnold PA, 2019, NEW PHYTOL, V222, P1235, DOI 10.1111/nph.15656
   as C., 2009, ALTITUDE FOR LATITUD
   Bauhus J, 2018, MINOR EUROPEAN BROAD
   Benito-Garzon M., 2019, TRAITSDM SPECIES DIS
   Borovics A, 2014, ERDESZETTUD KOZL, V4 4, P135
   Borovics A., 2013, DECLINE GENETIC DIVE
   Browne L, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P25179, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1908771116
   Cavender-Bares J, 2019, NEW PHYTOL, V221, P669, DOI 10.1111/nph.15450
   Chuine I, 2015, PHENOLOGICAL PLASTIC
   Csóka G, 2020, AGR FOREST ENTOMOL, V22, P61, DOI 10.1111/afe.12362
   Czúcz B, 2011, ANN FOREST SCI, V68, P99, DOI 10.1007/s13595-011-0011-4
   Davis MB, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P673, DOI 10.1126/science.292.5517.673
   DeMarche ML, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P775, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14562
   Ducousso A, 2004, EUFORGEN TECHNICAL G, P6
   en`es C., 2020, GENOMIC
   Epstein H.E., 2004, Global Change Biology, V10, P1325, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12629
   Fady B, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V375, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.015
   Fréjaville T, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P484, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14881
   Fuhrer E., 2011, APPLICATION
   Galos B., 2017, ERDESZETTUD KOZL, V7
   Garzón MB, 2019, NEW PHYTOL, V222, P1757, DOI 10.1111/nph.15716
   George JP, 2020, EVOL APPL, V13, P2422, DOI 10.1111/eva.13034
   Grady KC, 2015, RESTOR ECOL, V23, P811, DOI 10.1111/rec.12245
   Groisman P, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aae43c
   Gugerli F., 2016, WALD KLIMAWANDEL GRU, P93
   Horvath A., 2019, COMMON GARDEN COMP C
   Kremer A, 2020, NEW PHYTOL, V226, P987, DOI 10.1111/nph.16274
   Kremer A, 2016, CR BIOL, V339, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.crvi.2016.04.014
   Kremer A, 2012, ECOL LETT, V15, P378, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01746.x
   Leites LP, 2012, ECOL APPL, V22, P154, DOI 10.1890/11-0150.1
   Loehle C, 2000, CAN J FOREST RES, V30, P1632, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-30-10-1632
   Matyas C., 2009, FORESTS LIMIT EVOLUT
   Matyas C., 2016, CLIMATE CHANGE AFFEC
   Matyas C., 1992, EFFECT GEOGRAPHICAL
   Matyas C., 1989, P WFGA IUFRO S OL WA
   Matyas C., 1994, THE TREE
   Matyas C., 2006, MIGRATORY GENETIC PH
   Mátyás C, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9080489
   Mátyás C, 2010, NATURE, V464, P1271, DOI 10.1038/4641271a
   Metzger MJ, 2005, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V14, P549, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-822x.2005.00190.x
   Morrissey MB, 2016, EVOLUTION, V70, P1944, DOI 10.1111/evo.13003
   Nedealcov M, 2020, PRESENT ENV SUST DEV, V14, P219, DOI 10.15551/pesd2020141017
   Nicotra AB, 2010, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V15, P684, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.008
   O'Brien MJ, 2017, J APPL ECOL, V54, P1669, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12874
   Park A, 2014, CRIT REV PLANT SCI, V33, P251, DOI 10.1080/07352689.2014.858956
   Prasad A, 2020, DIVERS DISTRIB, V26, P1142, DOI 10.1111/ddi.13078
   Rehfeldt GE, 2002, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V8, P912, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00516.x
   Rehfeldt GE, 2006, INT J PLANT SCI, V167, P1123, DOI 10.1086/507711
   Rehfeldt GE, 2020, FORESTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/f11121237
   Rehfeldt GE, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P858, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13883
   Reyer CPO, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P75, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12023
   Saenz-Romero C., 2018, KOCSANYTALAN
   Sáenz-Romero C, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P2831, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13576
   Sánchez-Salguero R, 2018, J BIOGEOGR, V45, P1126, DOI 10.1111/jbi.13202
   Savolainen O, 2007, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V38, P595, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095646
   Stinziano JR, 2014, BOTANY, V92, P425, DOI 10.1139/cjb-2013-0314
   Ujvari-Jarmay E., 2016, ACTA SILV LIGNARIA H, V12, P178, DOI [DOI 10.1515/aslh-2016-0001, 10.1515/aslh-2016-0001]
   VIA S, 1993, AM NAT, V142, P352, DOI 10.1086/285542
   Vilà-Cabrera A, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P1549, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14597
   Vitasse Y, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P3781, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14803
   Wang TL, 2010, ECOL APPL, V20, P153, DOI 10.1890/08-2257.1
   Zala County, IDOJARAS, V119, P425
   Zellweger F, 2020, SCIENCE, V368, P772, DOI 10.1126/science.aba6880
NR 92
TC 15
Z9 15
U1 1
U2 19
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0378-1127
EI 1872-7042
J9 FOREST ECOL MANAG
JI For. Ecol. Manage.
PD FEB 15
PY 2021
VL 482
AR 118832
DI 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118832
PG 9
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA QH0HF
UT WOS:000617958400003
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Revord, RS
   Lovell, ST
   Capik, JM
   Mehlenbacher, SA
   Molnar, TJ
AF Revord, Ronald S.
   Lovell, Sarah T.
   Capik, John M.
   Mehlenbacher, Shawn A.
   Molnar, Thomas J.
TI Eastern Filbert Blight Resistance in American and Interspecific Hybrid
   Hazelnuts
SO JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Anisogramma anomala; disease resistance; germplasm; tree breeding
ID QUANTITATIVE RESISTANCE; GENETIC DIVERSITY; PLANT-PATHOGENS; MARKERS;
   INHERITANCE; ACCESSIONS; RUSSIA; DNA; SUSCEPTIBILITY; CULTIVARS
AB Eastern filbert blight (EFB), caused by the fungus Anisogramma anomala, is a primary limitation to european hazelnut (Corylus avellana) cultivation in eastern North America. American hazelnut (Corylus americana) is the endemic host of A. anomala and, despite its tiny, thick-shelled nuts, is a potentially valuable source of EFB resistance and climatic adaptation. Interspecific hybrids (Corylus americana x C. avellana) have been explored for nearly a century as a means to combine EFB resistance with wider adaptability and larger nuts. Although significant progress was made in the past, the genetic diversity of the starting material was limited and additional improvements are needed for expansion of hazelnut (Corylus sp.) production outside of Oregon, where 99% of the U.S. crop is currently produced. Our objective was to determine if C. americana can be a donor of EFB resistance. We crossed 29 diverse EFB-resistant C. americana accessions to EFB-susceptible C. avellana selections (31 total progenies) to produce 2031 F-1 plants. In addition, new C. americana germplasm was procured from across the native range of the species. The new collection of 1335 plants from 122 seed lots represents 72 counties and 22 states. The interspecific hybrid progenies and a subset of the American collection (616 trees from 62 seed lots) were field planted and evaluated for EFB response following field inoculations and natural disease spread over seven growing seasons. EFB was rated on a scale of 0 (no EFB) to 5 (all stems containing cankers). Results showed that progeny means of the interspecific hybrids ranged from 0.96 to 4.72. Fourteen of the 31 progenies were composed of at least one-third EFB-free or highly tolerant offspring (i.e., ratings 0-2), transmitting a significant level of resistance/tolerance. Several corresponding C. americana accessions that imparted a greater degree of resistance to their hybrid offspring were also identified. In addition, results showed that 587 (95.3%) of the 616 C. americana plants evaluated remained completely free of EFB. These findings confirm reports that the species rarely expresses signs or symptoms of the disease and should be robustly studied and exploited in breeding.
C1 [Revord, Ronald S.; Lovell, Sarah T.] Univ Illinois, Dept Crop Sci, Inst Sustainabil Energy & Environm, Plant Sci Lab, 1201 S Dorner Dr, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.
   [Capik, John M.; Molnar, Thomas J.] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Plant Biol, Foran Hall,59 Dudley Rd, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA.
   [Mehlenbacher, Shawn A.] Oregon State Univ, Dept Hort, 4017 Ag & Life Sci Bldg, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA.
C3 University of Illinois System; University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign;
   Rutgers University System; Rutgers University New Brunswick; Oregon
   State University
RP Molnar, TJ (corresponding author), Rutgers State Univ, Dept Plant Biol, Foran Hall,59 Dudley Rd, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA.
EM molnar@aesop.rutgers.edu
RI Capik, John/AAD-3416-2021; Lovell, Sarah/H-4478-2013; Molnar,
   Thomas/AAC-1429-2021
OI Molnar, Thomas/0000-0001-6099-4244
CR Bassil N, 2013, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V60, P543, DOI 10.1007/s10722-012-9857-z
   Bhattarai G, 2017, TREE GENET GENOMES, V13, DOI 10.1007/s11295-017-1129-9
   Bhattarai G, 2017, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V142, P289, DOI [10.21273/JASHS04145-17, 10.21273/jashs04145-17]
   Braun LC, 2019, AGROFOREST SYST, V93, P1081, DOI 10.1007/s10457-018-0209-7
   Capik JM, 2013, HORTSCIENCE, V48, P466, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.48.4.466
   Capik JM, 2012, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V137, P157, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.137.3.157
   Castroverde CDM, 2017, PLANT BIOLOGY, V19, P843, DOI 10.1111/plb.12582
   Chartrain L, 2005, PLANT PATHOL, V54, P134, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01164.x
   Chen HL, 2005, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V130, P412, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.130.3.412
   Chen H, 2007, HORTSCIENCE, V42, P466, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.42.3.466
   Colburn BC, 2015, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V140, P191, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.140.2.191
   Coll NS, 2011, CELL DEATH DIFFER, V18, P1247, DOI 10.1038/cdd.2011.37
   Corwin JA, 2017, PLANT CELL, V29, P655, DOI 10.1105/tpc.16.00915
   Coyne CJ, 1998, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V123, P253, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.123.2.253
   Crosby J.A., 1990, Acta Hortic, V317, P43
   Dangl JL, 2001, NATURE, V411, P826, DOI 10.1038/35081161
   Demchik M., 2011, Univ. Wisconsin Ext. Res. Bul, V17
   Demchik M, 2018, AGROFOREST SYST, V92, P1507, DOI 10.1007/s10457-017-0097-2
   Drumke J, 1964, THESIS
   Erdogan V, 2000, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V125, P489, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.125.4.489
   Erdogan V, 2000, SYST BOT, V25, P727, DOI 10.2307/2666730
   Fischbach J., 2019, PRODUCTION EC MODEL
   Fuller A. S., 1908, THE NUT CULTURIST
   Gessler C., 2012, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V26, P1
   Gleason HenryA., 1963, MANUAL VASCULAR PLAN
   Hammond E., 2006, THESIS
   Hayes RJ, 2011, THEOR APPL GENET, V123, P509, DOI 10.1007/s00122-011-1603-y
   Johnson K.B., 2002, Compendium of nut crop diseases in temperate zones, P44
   Jones JDG, 2006, NATURE, V444, P323, DOI 10.1038/nature05286
   Leadbetter CW, 2016, J AM POMOL SOC, V70, P92
   Lunde CF, 2000, HORTSCIENCE, V35, P729, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.35.4.729
   Lunde CF, 2006, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V131, P731, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.131.6.731
   Marinoni DT, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0195408
   Mehlenbacher S. A., 2018, Acta Horticulturae, P73, DOI 10.17660/actahortic.2018.1226.10
   Mehlenbacher S.A., 1994, ACTA HORTIC, V351, P23, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.1994.351.1
   MEHLENBACHER SA, 1991, HORTSCIENCE, V26, P410, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.26.4.410
   Mehlenbacher SA, 2000, HORTSCIENCE, V35, P314, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.35.2.314
   Mehlenbacher SA, 2001, HORTSCIENCE, V36, P995, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.36.5.995
   Mehlenbacher SA., 1991, Genetic Resources in temperate fruit and nut crops. Acta Hort, V290, P789
   Mehlenbacher SA, 2008, HORTSCIENCE, V43, P255, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.43.1.255
   Mehlenbacher SA, 2007, HORTSCIENCE, V42, P715, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.42.3.715
   Mehlenbacher SA, 2016, HORTSCIENCE, V51, P757, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.51.6.757
   Mehlenbacher SA, 2014, HORTSCIENCE, V49, P346, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.49.3.346
   Mehlenbacher SA, 2013, HORTSCIENCE, V48, P796, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.48.6.796
   Mehlenbacher SA, 2011, HORTSCIENCE, V46, P662, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.46.4.662
   Mehlenbacher SA, 2009, HORTSCIENCE, V44, P845, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.44.3.845
   Molnar T. J., 2018, Acta Horticulturae, P79, DOI 10.17660/actahortic.2018.1226.11
   Molnar T. J., 2012, Acta Horticulturae, P57
   Molnar TJ, 2009, ACTA HORTIC, V845, P73, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.845.6
   Molnar T.J., 2011, Wild crop relatives: Genomic and breeding resources, forest trees, P15, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-21250-5_2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21250-5_2]
   Molnar TJ, 2007, HORTSCIENCE, V42, P51, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.42.1.51
   Molnar TJ, 2012, HORTSCIENCE, V47, P1412, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.47.10.1412
   Molnar TJ, 2005, ACTA HORTIC, P609, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.686.81
   Muehlbauer M, 2018, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V235, P367, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.03.019
   Muehlbauer MF, 2014, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V139, P399, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.139.4.399
   Niks RE, 2015, ANNU REV PHYTOPATHOL, V53, P445, DOI 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080614-115928
   Parlange F, 2009, MOL MICROBIOL, V71, P851, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06547.x
   Petit-Houdenot Y, 2017, FRONT PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01072
   PINKERTON JN, 1992, PLANT DIS, V76, P1179, DOI 10.1094/PD-76-1179
   PINKERTON JN, 1993, PLANT DIS, V77, P261, DOI 10.1094/PD-77-0261
   Poland JA, 2009, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V14, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.006
   R Core Team, 2014, R PROJECT STAT COMPU
   Rutter M., 1991, Annu. Rpt. Northern Nut Growers Assn, V82, P159
   Rutter P.A., 1987, Annu. Rpt. Northern Nut Growers Assn, V78, P173
   Saintenac C, 2018, NAT GENET, V50, P368, DOI 10.1038/s41588-018-0051-x
   SALESSES G, 1988, CYTOLOGIA, V53, P407, DOI 10.1508/cytologia.53.407
   Sathuvalli VR, 2014, ACTA HORTIC, V1052, P27
   Sathuvalli VR, 2011, TREE GENET GENOMES, V7, P337, DOI 10.1007/s11295-010-0335-5
   Sathuvalli VR, 2012, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V59, P1055, DOI 10.1007/s10722-011-9743-0
   Sathuvalli VR, 2011, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V136, P350, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.136.5.350
   Slate GL, 1969, HDB N AM NUT TREES, P287
   Stall RE, 2009, ANNU REV PHYTOPATHOL, V47, P265, DOI 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081752
   Tang DZ, 2017, PLANT CELL, V29, P618, DOI 10.1105/tpc.16.00891
   Technavio, 2017, GLOB HAZ MARK 2017 2
   Thompson M. M., 1996, Fruit Breeding, VIII, P125, DOI DOI 10.1093/0XF0RDJ0URNALS.JHERED.A110035
   Weschcke C., 1963, 54th Annual Report of the Northern Nut Growers' Association, 1963. Inc. Annual Meeting held at Fort Valley, Georgia, August 19-21 1963, P63
   Weschcke C, 1953, GROWING NUTS N
NR 77
TC 9
Z9 16
U1 0
U2 3
PU AMER SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
PI ALEXANDRIA
PA 113 S WEST ST, STE 200, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2851 USA
SN 0003-1062
EI 2327-9788
J9 J AM SOC HORTIC SCI
JI J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.
PD MAY
PY 2020
VL 145
IS 3
BP 162
EP +
DI 10.21273/JASHS04732-19
PG 16
WC Horticulture
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA LK2VB
UT WOS:000530719100003
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Ebrahimi, A
   Lawson, SS
   McKenna, JR
   Jacobs, DF
AF Ebrahimi, Aziz
   Lawson, Shaneka S.
   McKenna, James R.
   Jacobs, Douglass F.
TI Morpho-Physiological and Genomic Evaluation of <i>Juglans</i> Species
   Reveals Regional Maladaptation to Cold Stress
SO FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE cold hardiness; interspecific F1 hybrids; Juglans; signature of
   selection; Carpathian walnut
ID ELECTROLYTE LEAKAGE; GENE-EXPRESSION; BLACK-WALNUT; REGIA L.; HARDINESS;
   RESISTANCE; TREES; ACCLIMATION; ARABIDOPSIS; DIVERSITY
AB Climate change may have unpredictable effects on the cold hardiness of woody species planted outside of their range of origin. Extreme undulations in temperatures may exacerbate susceptibility to cold stress, thereby interfering with productivity and ecosystem functioning. Juglans L. and their naturally occurring interspecific F1 hybrids, are distributed natively across many temperate regions, and J. regia has been extensively introduced. Cold hardiness, an environmental and genetic factor yet to be evaluated in many native and introduced Juglans species, may be a limiting factor under future climate change and following species introductions. We evaluated cold hardiness of native North American and Eastern Asian Juglans along with J. regia genotypes using field data from the Midwestern United States (Indiana), controlled freezing tests, and genome sequencing with close assessment of Juglans cold hardy genes. Many Juglans species previously screened for cold-hardiness were genotypes derived from the Midwest, California, and Europe. In 2014, despite general climate adaptation, Midwestern winter temperatures of -30 degrees C killed J. regia originating from California; however, naturalized Midwestern J. regia survived and displayed low damage. Hybridization of J. regia with black walnut (J. nigra) and butternut (J. cinerea) produced F1s displaying greater cold tolerance than pure J. regia. Cold hardiness and growth are variable in Midwestern J. regia compared to native Juglans, East Asian Juglans, and F1 hybrids. Phylogeny analyses revealed that J. cinerea sorted with East Asian species using the nuclear genome but with North American species using the organellar genome. Investigation of selected cold hardy genes revealed that J. regia was distinct from other species and exhibited less genetic diversity than native Juglans species Average whole genome heterozygosity and Tajima's D for cold hardy genes was low within J. regia samples and significantly higher for hybrid as well as J. nigra. We confirmed that molecular and morpho-physiological data were highly correlated and thus can be used effectively to characterize cold hardiness in Juglans species. We conclude that the genetic diversity within local J. regia populations is low and additional germplasm is needed for development of more regionally adapted J. regia varieties.
C1 [Ebrahimi, Aziz; Jacobs, Douglass F.] Purdue Univ, Dept Forestry & Nat Resources, Hardwood Tree Improvement & Regenerat Ctr, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
   [Lawson, Shaneka S.; McKenna, James R.] US Forest Serv, USDA, Northern Res Stn, Hardwood Tree Improvement & Regenerat Ctr, W Lafayette, IN USA.
C3 Purdue University System; Purdue University; United States Department of
   Agriculture (USDA); United States Forest Service
RP Jacobs, DF (corresponding author), Purdue Univ, Dept Forestry & Nat Resources, Hardwood Tree Improvement & Regenerat Ctr, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
EM djacobs@purdue.edu
RI Ebrahimi, Aziz/AAY-9389-2020; lawson, shaneka/AAV-1569-2021
OI Ebrahimi, Aziz/0000-0003-3122-0404
FU Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center (HTIRC) at Purdue
   University; USDA Forest Service; Department of Forestry and Natural
   Resources at Purdue University, United States
FX This work was supported by Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration
   Center (HTIRC) at Purdue University, the USDA Forest Service, and the
   Department of Forestry and Natural Resources at Purdue University,
   United States.
CR Aitken SN, 2016, EVOL APPL, V9, P271, DOI 10.1111/eva.12293
   Alix B, 2012, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V40, pW573, DOI 10.1093/nar/gks485
   Aslamarz AA, 2011, EUR J HORTIC SCI, V76, P84
   Bai WN, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V217, P1726, DOI 10.1111/nph.14917
   Benedict C, 2006, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V29, P1259, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01505.x
   Bolger AM, 2014, BIOINFORMATICS, V30, P2114, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
   Bonhomme M, 2015, MOL BIOL EVOL, V32, P2097, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msv092
   Buchfink B, 2015, NAT METHODS, V12, P59, DOI 10.1038/nmeth.3176
   Charrier G, 2013, TREE PHYSIOL, V33, P1229, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpt090
   Charrier G, 2011, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V55, P763, DOI 10.1007/s00484-011-0470-1
   Demesure B., 1996, NOBLE HARDWOODS NETW, P9
   Dhawan SS, 2016, PROTOPLASMA, V253, P845, DOI 10.1007/s00709-015-0847-9
   Doyle J., 1990, Focus, V12, P13
   Earnshaw M. J., 1993, STRESS INDICATORS EL, P152
   Ebrahimi A, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0207861
   Ebrahimi A, 2017, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V220, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.03.030
   Fan H, 2015, BMC GENOMICS, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1647-5
   GEORGE MF, 1977, ECOLOGY, V58, P674, DOI 10.2307/1939018
   Gilmour SJ, 1998, PLANT J, V16, P433, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00310.x
   Grimo E., 1979, NUT TREE CULTURE N A, P74
   Guàrdia M, 2013, FOREST SCI, V59, P559, DOI 10.5849/forsci.12-094
   Hamilton JA, 2013, MOL ECOL, V22, P827, DOI 10.1111/mec.12007
   Hu YH, 2017, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.01955
   Jacobs DF, 2008, ANN FOREST SCI, V65, DOI 10.1051/forest:2008036
   Joosen RVL, 2006, TREE PHYSIOL, V26, P1297, DOI 10.1093/treephys/26.10.1297
   LaBonte NR, 2018, FRONT PLANT SCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00810
   Langmead B, 2009, GENOME BIOL, V10, DOI 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25
   Lee JH, 2012, TREE PHYSIOL, V32, P1533, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tps102
   Livak KJ, 2001, METHODS, V25, P402, DOI 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
   Lu PX, 2007, TREE PHYSIOL, V27, P243, DOI 10.1093/treephys/27.2.243
   Luo RB, 2012, GIGASCIENCE, V1, DOI 10.1186/2047-217X-1-18
   Lyons J. M., 1979, LOW TEMPERATURE STRE, P4
   MANNING WE, 1978, ANN MO BOT GARD, V65, P1058, DOI 10.2307/2398782
   Marrano A., 2019, BIORXIV PREPRINT, DOI [10.1101/809798x, DOI 10.1101/809798X]
   Martínez-García PJ, 2016, PLANT J, V87, P507, DOI 10.1111/tpj.13207
   MCKAY HM, 1992, CAN J FOREST RES, V22, P1371, DOI 10.1139/x92-182
   McKay J. W., 1965, ANN REP N NUT GROWER, V56, P76
   McKenna A, 2010, GENOME RES, V20, P1297, DOI 10.1101/gr.107524.110
   Mercuri AM, 2013, QUATERN INT, V303, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.01.005
   Mitra SK, 1991, WALNUT TEMPERATE FRU, V27, P377
   PATTERSON B D, 1976, Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, V3, P435
   Poirier M., 2004, 5 INT WALN S, V705, P281, DOI DOI 10.17660/actahortic.2005.705.35
   Pollegioni P, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0172541
   Potts D.T., 2018, Dabir, V6, P101
   Ramos D.E., 1997, WALNUT PRODUCTION MA
   Robichaud RL, 2006, NEW FOREST, V32, P179, DOI 10.1007/s11056-005-5961-7
   SAKAI A, 1973, ECOLOGY, V54, P118, DOI 10.2307/1934380
   Schaberg PG, 2000, ECOL STU AN, V139, P181
   St Clair JB, 2006, CAN J BOT, V84, P1110, DOI 10.1139/B06-084
   Stanford AM, 2000, AM J BOT, V87, P872, DOI 10.2307/2656895
   Stanke M, 2006, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V34, pW435, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkl200
   Steel RGD., 1997, Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach
   Stevens KA, 2018, G3-GENES GENOM GENET, V8, P2153, DOI 10.1534/g3.118.200030
   SUTINEN ML, 1992, TREE PHYSIOL, V11, P241, DOI 10.1093/treephys/11.3.241
   Tamura K, 2007, MOL BIOL EVOL, V24, P1596, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msm092
   Thornton KR, 2007, GENETICS, V175, P737, DOI 10.1534/genetics.106.064642
   Wang GF, 2004, PLANT PHYSIOL, V135, P1084, DOI 10.1104/pp.104.040436
   WEISER CJ, 1970, SCIENCE, V169, P1269, DOI 10.1126/science.169.3952.1269
   Wisniewski M, 2015, FRONT PLANT SCI, V6, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00085
   Wisniewski M, 2014, CRIT REV PLANT SCI, V33, P92, DOI 10.1080/07352689.2014.870408
   Wysoker A., 2013, Picard tools version 1.90
   Zarei A., 2012, Asian Australas. J. Plant Sci. Biotechnol, V6, P32
   Zuckerkandl E., 1965, EVOLVING GENES PROTE, P97, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-1-4832-2734-4.50017-6
NR 63
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 6
U2 34
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
SN 1664-462X
J9 FRONT PLANT SCI
JI Front. Plant Sci.
PD MAR 10
PY 2020
VL 11
AR 229
DI 10.3389/fpls.2020.00229
PG 13
WC Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences
GA LB6UU
UT WOS:000524769500001
PM 32210997
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Li, Y
   Zhang, JC
   Sailor, DJ
   Ban-Weiss, GA
AF Li, Yun
   Zhang, Jiachen
   Sailor, David J.
   Ban-Weiss, George A.
TI Effects of urbanization on regional meteorology and air quality in
   Southern California
SO ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
LA English
DT Article
ID URBAN HEAT-ISLAND; CANOPY MODEL; BOUNDARY-LAYER; OZONE; CLIMATE;
   IMPACTS; MITIGATION; PARAMETERIZATION; SIMULATION; DEPOSITION
AB Urbanization has a profound influence on regional meteorology and air quality in megapolitan Southern California. The influence of urbanization on meteorology is driven by changes in land surface physical properties and land surface processes. These changes in meteorology in turn influence air quality by changing temperature-dependent chemical reactions and emissions, gas-particle phase partitioning, and ventilation of pollutants. In this study we characterize the influence of land surface changes via historical urbanization from before human settlement to the present day on meteorology and air quality in Southern California using the Weather Research and Forecasting Model coupled to chemistry and the single-layer urban canopy model (WRF-UCM- Chem). We assume identical anthropogenic emissions for the simulations carried out and thus focus on the effect of changes in land surface physical properties and land surface processes on air quality. Historical urbanization has led to daytime air temperature decreases of up to 1.4 K and evening temperature increases of up to 1.7 K. Ventilation of air in the LA basin has decreased up to 36.6 % during daytime and increased up to 27.0 % during nighttime. These changes in meteorology are mainly attributable to higher evaporative fluxes and thermal inertia of soil from irrigation and increased surface roughness and thermal inertia from buildings. Changes in ventilation drive changes in hourly NO, concentrations with increases of up to 2.7 ppb during daytime and decreases of up to 4.7 ppb at night. Hourly O-3 concentrations decrease by up to 0.94 ppb in the morning and increase by up to 5.6 ppb at other times of day. Changes in O-3 concentrations are driven by the competing effects of changes in ventilation and precursor NO(x )concentrations. PM2.5 concentrations show slight increases during the day and decreases of up to 2.5 mu g M-3 at night. Process drivers for changes in PM(2)(.5)( )include modifications to atmospheric ventilation and temperature, which impact gas-particle phase partitioning for semi-volatile compounds and chemical reactions. Understanding process drivers related to how land surface changes effect regional meteorology and air quality is crucial for decision-making on urban planning in megapolitan Southern California to achieve regional climate adaptation and air quality improvements.
C1 [Li, Yun; Zhang, Jiachen; Ban-Weiss, George A.] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA.
   [Sailor, David J.] Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA.
C3 University of Southern California; Arizona State University; Arizona
   State University-Tempe
RP Ban-Weiss, GA (corresponding author), Univ Southern Calif, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA.
EM banweiss@usc.edu
RI Zhang, Jiachen/KHY-7838-2024; Sailor, David/E-6308-2014
OI Sailor, David/0000-0003-1720-8214; Ban-Weiss, George/0000-0001-8211-2628
FU US National Science Foundation [CBET-1512429, CBET-1623948,
   CBET-1752522]; University of Southern California's Center for
   High-Performance Computing
FX This research is supported by the US National Science Foundation under
   grants CBET-1512429, CBET-1623948, and CBET-1752522. Model simulations
   for the work described in this paper are supported by the University of
   Southern California's Center for High-Performance Computing
   (https://hpcc.usc.edu/, last access: 14 July 2018). We thank Scott
   Epstein and Sang-Mi Lee at the South Coast Air Quality Management
   District and Jeremy Avise at California Air Resources Board for
   providing us emission datasets. We also thank Ravan Ahmadov and Stu
   McKeen at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for their
   helpful suggestions.
CR Abdul-Wahab SA, 2005, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V20, P1263, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.09.001
   Ackermann IJ, 1998, ATMOS ENVIRON, V32, P2981, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00006-5
   Ahmadov R, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V117, DOI 10.1029/2011JD016831
   American Lung Association, 2012, STAT AIR 2012
   [Anonymous], J APPL METEOROL CLIM, DOI DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1970)0092.0.CO;2,1970
   [Anonymous], 2006, PERS, V77, P858
   [Anonymous], FIN 2016 AIR QUAL MA
   Ashrafi K, 2009, INT J ENVIRON RES, V3, P637
   Aw J, 2003, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V108, DOI 10.1029/2002JD002688
   Boucher O, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P571, DOI 10.1017/cbo9781107415324.016
   Burian SJ, 2005, HYDROL PROCESS, V19, P1089, DOI 10.1002/hyp.5647
   CARNAHAN WH, 1990, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V33, P65, DOI 10.1016/0034-4257(90)90056-R
   Carter W.P.L., 2003, The SAPRC-99 Chemical Mechanism and Updated VOC Reactivity Scales
   CHARLSON RJ, 1992, SCIENCE, V255, P423, DOI 10.1126/science.255.5043.423
   Chen F, 2001, MON WEATHER REV, V129, P569, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2
   Chen FF, 2011, INDISPENSABLE TRUTH: HOW FUSION POWER CAN SAVE THE PLANET, P273, DOI [10.1002/joc.2158, 10.1007/978-1-4419-7820-2_8]
   Chen L, 2018, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V123, P4323, DOI 10.1002/2017JD027501
   Ching J, 2009, B AM METEOROL SOC, V90, P1157, DOI 10.1175/2009BAMS2675.1
   Chou M.-D., 1999, NASA TECH MEMO, V15, P1
   Civerolo K, 2007, ATMOS ENVIRON, V41, P1803, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.076
   DYER AJ, 1970, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V96, P715, DOI 10.1002/qj.49709641012
   Epstein SA, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P8991, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1703560114
   Fallmann J, 2016, ATMOS ENVIRON, V125, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.094
   Fan C, 2017, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/rs9070672
   Garratt J.R., 1994, ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY, P15
   Georgescu M, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P2909, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1322280111
   Grell GA, 2005, ATMOS ENVIRON, V39, P6957, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027
   Grell GA, 2002, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V29, DOI 10.1029/2002GL015311
   Grimm NB, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P756, DOI 10.1126/science.1150195
   Guenther A, 2006, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V6, P3181, DOI 10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006
   Hardin AW, 2018, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V62, P43, DOI 10.1007/s00484-017-1357-6
   Hassan SK, 2013, ATMOS POLLUT RES, V4, P117, DOI 10.5094/APR.2013.012
   Hong SY, 2006, MON WEATHER REV, V134, P2318, DOI 10.1175/MWR3199.1
   Imhoff ML, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P504, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2009.10.008
   Jiang XY, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V113, DOI 10.1029/2008JD009820
   Kalnay E, 2003, NATURE, V423, P528, DOI 10.1038/nature01675
   Kim SW, 2009, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V114, DOI 10.1029/2008JD011343
   Kumar R, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-14213-2
   Kusaka H, 2001, BOUND-LAY METEOROL, V101, P329, DOI 10.1023/A:1019207923078
   Kusaka H, 2012, J METEOROL SOC JPN, V90B, P33, DOI 10.2151/jmsj.2012-B03
   Li D, 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/9/5/055001
   Li MM, 2017, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V122, P3116, DOI 10.1002/2016JD026182
   LIN YL, 1983, J CLIM APPL METEOROL, V22, P1065, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<1065:BPOTSF>2.0.CO;2
   LIPPMANN M, 1989, JAPCA J AIR WASTE MA, V39, P672, DOI 10.1080/08940630.1989.10466554
   MADRONICH S, 1987, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V92, P9740, DOI 10.1029/JD092iD08p09740
   Marr LC, 2002, ATMOS ENVIRON, V36, P2327, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00188-7
   Mesinger F, 2006, B AM METEOROL SOC, V87, P343, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-87-3-343
   Mlawer EJ, 1997, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V102, P16663, DOI 10.1029/97JD00237
   OKE TR, 1982, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V108, P1, DOI 10.1002/qj.49710845502
   Pankow JF, 1997, ATMOS ENVIRON, V31, P927, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00239-7
   Peng SS, 2012, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V46, P696, DOI 10.1021/es2030438
   Pope CA, 2006, J AIR WASTE MANAGE, V56, P709, DOI 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485
   Qiao Z, 2013, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V85, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.08.010
   Rao ST, 2003, PURE APPL GEOPHYS, V160, P21, DOI 10.1007/s00024-003-8764-9
   Rizwan AM, 2008, J ENVIRON SCI, V20, P120, DOI 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60019-4
   Seto KC, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P16083, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1211658109
   Steiner AL, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P19685, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1008336107
   Stewart ID, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P1879, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00019.1
   Stockwell WR, 1997, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V102, P25847, DOI 10.1029/97JD00849
   STOCKWELL WR, 1990, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V95, P16343, DOI 10.1029/JD095iD10p16343
   Taha H, 2015, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V19, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2015.03.009
   Tao W, 2015, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V15, P8597, DOI 10.5194/acp-15-8597-2015
   Theeuwes NE, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/114022
   U.S. EPA, 2014, Profile of the 2011 National Air Emissions Inventory
   Vahmani P, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124027
   Vahmani P, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P8240, DOI 10.1002/2016GL069658
   Vahmani P, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V121, P1511, DOI 10.1002/2015JD023718
   Vahmani P, 2014, J HYDROMETEOROL, V15, P1440, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-13-0121.1
   Wang KC, 2017, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V122, P2131, DOI 10.1002/2016JD025304
   WESELY ML, 1989, ATMOS ENVIRON, V23, P1293, DOI 10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4
   Wickham JD, 2013, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V130, P294, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2012.12.001
   Xu M, 2006, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V111, DOI 10.1029/2006JD007337
   Yang JC, 2015, BOUND-LAY METEOROL, V155, P87, DOI 10.1007/s10546-014-9991-6
   Zhang J., 2018, ENV SCI TECHNO UNPUB
   Zhang JC, 2018, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V52, P11188, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.8b00732
   Zhang N, 2010, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V102, P331, DOI 10.1007/s00704-010-0263-1
   Zhao L, 2014, NATURE, V511, P216, DOI 10.1038/nature13462
NR 77
TC 46
Z9 47
U1 5
U2 59
PU COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
PI GOTTINGEN
PA BAHNHOFSALLEE 1E, GOTTINGEN, 37081, GERMANY
SN 1680-7316
EI 1680-7324
J9 ATMOS CHEM PHYS
JI Atmos. Chem. Phys.
PD APR 5
PY 2019
VL 19
IS 7
BP 4439
EP 4457
DI 10.5194/acp-19-4439-2019
PG 19
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA HR9WQ
UT WOS:000463512700001
OA gold, Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Senfeldr, M
   Shinneman, DJ
   Mcilroy, SK
   Rogers, PC
   Derose, RJ
AF Senfeldr, Martin
   Shinneman, Douglas J.
   Mcilroy, Susan K.
   Rogers, Paul C.
   Derose, R. Justin
TI Variable climate-growth relationships of quaking aspen <i>(Populus
   tremuloides)</i> among Sky Island mountain ranges in the Great Basin,
   Nevada, USA
SO FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Great Basin; Climate; Growth; Dendroecology; Drought; Populus
   tremuloides; Precipitation; Tree rings
ID RADIAL GROWTH; NORTH-AMERICA; WESTERN; FOREST; DROUGHT; VARIABILITY;
   COLORADO; ACCUMULATION; PRODUCTIVITY; BIODIVERSITY
AB The Great Basin is an arid province located in the interior western United States. The region encompasses millions of hectares and quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) forests comprise a minor portion of the total area. However, montane aspen forests play a disproportionately large role in providing ecosystem services in the region, including water retention, biodiversity, wildlife habitat, livestock forage, and recreational uses. With warming temperatures, increasing evaporative demand, and heightened precipitation variability, the future of aspen has become a critical concern. Using dendroecological approaches, we assessed growth patterns of 20 aspen stands across three geographically isolated "sky island" mountain ranges spanning portions of the north central Great Basin. We anticipated that the growth of Great Basin aspen would be strongly influenced by regional climatic patterns and largely in synchrony. Results revealed a more complex growth dynamic that varied among mountain ranges and across environmental gradients. In particular, aspen climate-growth relationships in the slightly dryer Ruby Mountains were strongly and positively correlated (r > 0.5) with previous fall to winter moisture availability. The Jarbidge Mountains had a positive but modest relationship with previous fall to winter moisture availability (r > 0.3). Climate-growth response in the Santa Rosa Mountains, the wettest range, showed no significant response to moisture availability during any time period examined but had greater tree-ring growth with warmer May temperatures. Although tree-ring centennial (1910 - 2010) growth trends were positive for all three mountain ranges, only the Santa Rosa Mountains maintained a positive recent growth trend (1970 - 2010). Moreover, distinct temporal shifts in tree growth-climate relationships in each mountain range suggest potentially unique aspen population adaptations to climate variability. For instance, in two of the mountain ranges, there was a shift from positive/neutral to negative growth relationships with temperature starting around the 1963 - 1987 time period, while tree growth also began simultaneously responding more positively to moisture availability. These growth shifts and observed enhanced sensitivities to monthly and seasonal climate variables over time may reflect dynamic tree growth responses caused by ongoing global climate change, but that may be tempered by local or regional factors, such as the relative availability and timing of soil moisture provided by spring snowmelt. A better understanding of biogeographic variation and causality in aspen growth could provide multiple management pathways governed by resilience characteristics in the face of future anthropogenic and climatic threats.
C1 [Senfeldr, Martin] Mendel Univ Brno, Fac Forestry & Wood Technol, Dept Forest Bot Dendrol & Geobiocoenol, Brno, Czech Republic.
   [Shinneman, Douglas J.; Mcilroy, Susan K.] US Geol Survey, Forest & Rangeland Ecosyst Sci Ctr, Boise, ID 83702 USA.
   [Rogers, Paul C.] Utah State Univ, Ecol Ctr, Dept Environm & Soc, Western Aspen Alliance, Logan, UT 84322 USA.
   [Derose, R. Justin] Utah State Univ, Ecol Ctr, Dept Wildland Resources, Logan, UT 84322 USA.
C3 Mendel University in Brno; United States Department of the Interior;
   United States Geological Survey; Utah System of Higher Education; Utah
   State University; Utah System of Higher Education; Utah State University
RP Senfeldr, M (corresponding author), Mendel Univ Brno, Fac Forestry & Wood Technol, Dept Forest Bot Dendrol & Geobiocoenol, Brno, Czech Republic.
EM martin.senfeldr@mendelu.cz
RI Šenfeldr, Martin/C-1897-2014; DeRose, Robert/AAH-1900-2020
OI McIlroy, Susan/0000-0001-5088-3700; Senfeldr, Martin/0000-0002-8314-6632
FU U.S. Geological Survey National Climate Adaptation Science Center; Great
   Basin Landscape Conservation Cooperative; Utah Agricultural Experiment
   Station; Utah State University, Logan [84322-4810]; OP RDE project
   "MENDELU international development II" - ESF; 
   [CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/18_053/0016930]
FX We thank the managers of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest for
   logistical support and sampling permits. Funding for the initial study
   was provided by the U.S. Geological Survey National Climate Adaptation
   Science Center and the Great Basin Landscape Conservation Cooperative.
   We are grateful to Richie Gardner for invaluable field and laboratory
   work for this project. The Utah State University Ecology Center and the
   T.W. Daniel Endowment supported the second phase of this study. This
   research was supported in part by the Utah Agricultural Experiment
   Station, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-4810. Approved as
   journal paper no. 9694. Martin Senfeldr was supported from the OP RDE
   project "MENDELU international development II", registration no.:
   CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/18_053/0016930, funded by the ESF. Any use of trade,
   firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not
   imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
CR Allen CD, 2015, ECOSPHERE, V6, DOI 10.1890/ES15-00203.1
   Anderegg WRL, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P1188, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12100
   Andrus RA, 2021, ECOSPHERE, V12, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.3345
   [Anonymous], 2010, Fundamentals of treering research
   Beaty M., 2004, Mid-scale existing vegetation map
   Bell DM, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P1441, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12504
   Biondi F., 1997, Dendrochronologia, V15, P139
   Bunn AG, 2008, DENDROCHRONOLOGIA, V26, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.dendro.2008.01.002
   Callahan CM, 2013, J BIOGEOGR, V40, P1780, DOI 10.1111/jbi.12115
   Carroll CJW, 2019, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V159, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.12.014
   Castagneri D, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V320, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.023
   Chong GW, 2001, USDA ROCKY, P261
   Clark JS, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P2329, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13160
   Cook E.R. L.A. Kairiukstis., 2013, METHODS DENDROCHRONO
   Cook ER, 2007, EARTH-SCI REV, V81, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.12.002
   Crouch CD, 2021, BIOL INVASIONS, V23, P2893, DOI 10.1007/s10530-021-02545-0
   DeByle N.V., 1985, U S Forest Service General Technical Report RM, P135
   DeRose RJ, 2022, J CHEM ECOL, V48, P431, DOI 10.1007/s10886-022-01355-5
   DeRose RJ, 2015, CAN J FOREST RES, V45, P1, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0382
   DeRose RJ, 2017, J FOREST, V115, P283, DOI 10.5849/jof.15-097
   Dudley MM, 2015, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V353, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.002
   Frey BR, 2004, CAN J FOREST RES, V34, P1379, DOI 10.1139/X04-062
   Gray LK, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V117, P289, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0548-8
   Harniss R.O., 1982, USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT (USA). no. INT-297
   HARPER K.T., 1978, GREAT BASIN NATURALI, V2, P81
   Hoang L., 2018, General Technical Report
   Hogg EH, 2008, CAN J FOREST RES, V38, P1373, DOI 10.1139/X08-001
   HOLMES R L, 1983, Tree-Ring Bulletin, V43, P69
   Ireland KB, 2020, CAN J FOREST RES, V50, P1206, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2019-0222
   Ireland KB, 2014, OECOLOGIA, V175, P847, DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-2951-5
   Kelsey KC, 2018, ECOSYSTEMS, V21, P125, DOI 10.1007/s10021-017-0139-7
   Kitchen SG, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V285, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.08.012
   Klesse S, 2021, DENDROCHRONOLOGIA, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.dendro.2020.125786
   Klesse S, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P5146, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15170
   Klos PZ, 2014, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V41, P4560, DOI 10.1002/2014GL060500
   Kretchun AM, 2020, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V462, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118005
   Kulakowski D, 2013, J VEG SCI, V24, P168, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01437.x
   LaMalfa EM, 2008, ECOSYSTEMS, V11, P569, DOI 10.1007/s10021-008-9143-2
   Leonelli G, 2008, CAN J FOREST RES, V38, P1211, DOI 10.1139/X07-227
   Little E. L., CONIFERS IMPORTANT H, V1
   Long JN, 2012, CAN J FOREST RES, V42, P2011, DOI 10.1139/x2012-143
   Love DM, 2019, WATER RESOUR RES, V55, P1833, DOI 10.1029/2018WR023468
   Malanson George P., 2015, Biodiversity (Ottawa), V16, P237, DOI 10.1080/14888386.2015.1117989
   Marshal AM, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P8882, DOI 10.1029/2019GL083770
   Mathys AS, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P920, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13440
   McCormack J. E., 2009, ENCY ISLANDS, P839, DOI DOI 10.1525/J.CTT1PN90R
   Mcllroy SK, 2020, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V455, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117681
   McNab W.H., 2007, GEN TECHNICAL REPORT, V76, P1, DOI DOI 10.2737/WO-GTR-76B
   Meier GA, 2015, ECOL INDIC, V48, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.033
   Meko DM, 2011, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V37, P1234, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.01.013
   Millar CI, 2018, CAN J FOREST RES, V48, P663, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2017-0374
   Mock CJ, 1996, J CLIMATE, V9, P1111, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<1111:CCASVO>2.0.CO;2
   Mock KE, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048406
   Mote PW, 2018, NPJ CLIM ATMOS SCI, V1, DOI 10.1038/s41612-018-0012-1
   Mote PW, 2010, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V102, P29, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9848-z
   Mueggler W.F., 1988, General Technical Report INT-250
   Nayak A, 2010, WATER RESOUR RES, V46, DOI 10.1029/2008WR007525
   Nigro KM, 2022, J BIOGEOGR, V49, P201, DOI 10.1111/jbi.14302
   Pepin N, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P424, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2563, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2563]
   Pepin NC, 2022, REV GEOPHYS, V60, DOI 10.1029/2020RG000730
   Peters RL, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P2040, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12826
   R Core Team, 2022, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
   Redmond MD, 2023, ECOSPHERE, V14, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.4505
   Redmond MD, 2018, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V427, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.05.057
   Rehfeldt GE, 2009, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V258, P2353, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.005
   Rogers PC, 2020, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V21, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00828
   Rogers PC, 2014, FOREST SCI, V60, P345, DOI 10.5849/forsci.12-156
   Rogers PC, 2014, J VEG SCI, V25, P457, DOI 10.1111/jvs.12099
   Seager ST, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V299, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.02.017
   Shepperd W.D., 2006, Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRSGTR-178, V178
   Shinneman Douglas, 2019, USGS, DOI 10.5066/F7HX1BM5
   Shinneman DJ, 2019, ECOL APPL, V29, DOI 10.1002/eap.1948
   Shinneman DJ, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V299, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.032
   Soderquist BS, 2018, ECOSPHERE, V9, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2068
   Strand EK, 2009, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V257, P1705, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.026
   Swain S, 2015, CLIM DYNAM, V44, P2737, DOI 10.1007/s00382-014-2255-9
   Tague C, 2009, ECOHYDROLOGY, V2, P541, DOI 10.1002/eco.88
   Wall TG, 2001, J RANGE MANAGE, V54, P691, DOI 10.2307/4003673
   Wang TL, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0156720
   WELLS PV, 1983, ECOL MONOGR, V53, P341, DOI 10.2307/1942644
   Westerling AL, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P940, DOI 10.1126/science.1128834
   WIGLEY TML, 1984, J CLIM APPL METEOROL, V23, P201, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<0201:OTAVOC>2.0.CO;2
   Winstral A, 2002, HYDROL PROCESS, V16, P3585, DOI 10.1002/hyp.1238
   Worrall JJ, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V299, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.033
   Yang J, 2015, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V30, P1055, DOI 10.1007/s10980-015-0160-1
   Zang C, 2015, ECOGRAPHY, V38, P431, DOI 10.1111/ecog.01335
NR 86
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 1
U2 7
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0378-1127
EI 1872-7042
J9 FOREST ECOL MANAG
JI For. Ecol. Manage.
PD FEB 15
PY 2024
VL 554
AR 121664
DI 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121664
EA DEC 2023
PG 13
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA IJ9X9
UT WOS:001166086400001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Hargreaves, AL
   Eckert, CG
AF Hargreaves, Anna L.
   Eckert, Christopher G.
TI Evolution of dispersal and mating systems along geographic gradients:
   implications for shifting ranges
SO FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; eco-evolutionary dynamics; invasion; local adaptation;
   mating system; range contraction; range expansion; range shift; seed
   dispersal; species' distributions
ID REDUCED INBREEDING DEPRESSION; DENSITY-DEPENDENT DISPERSAL; SYNDROMES
   LINKING DISPERSAL; SELF-FERTILIZATION; REPRODUCTIVE ASSURANCE;
   POPULATION-SIZE; PERIPHERAL-POPULATIONS; SEED DISPERSAL; CLIMATE-CHANGE;
   INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION
AB 1 Dispersal affects species' ability to move or adapt in response to environmental change. Successful long-distance dispersal also requires reproduction in areas with few mates, thus mating systems, especially the capacity for self-fertilization, may influence the speed and success of range shifts. Here, we review: the theoretical predictions regarding dispersal and mating-system evolution at equilibrium, expanding and contracting range limits; the empirical support for these predictions; and how these geographic patterns may influence future range evolution. Equilibrium range limits can arise from environmental gradients in habitat quality, temporal variation or habitat heterogeneity. Dispersal has been predicted to increase or decrease towards range edges, depending on which life-history traits respond to the ecological gradient(s). In general, spatial habitat isolation selects against dispersal, whereas temporal stochasticity favours dispersal. At expanding range fronts, dispersal should increase due to spatial sorting for dispersive individuals and the benefits of colonizing vacant habitat. Dispersal evolution is likely more constrained during native range shifts than invasions. Models of expansion across environmental gradients and during climate-tracking range shifts are lacking. Little theory considers evolution at contracting range margins. We suggest that increased dispersal should be selected if there is local adaptation to climate, as dispersers from warmer areas will out-compete nondispersers no longer adapted to new climatic conditions. Dispersal increases should be more pronounced in regions where local adaptation is stronger. Self fertilization may be favoured at equilibrium, expanding or contracting range margins by providing reproductive assurance. However, this benefit depends on how inbreeding depression is influenced by genetic load, the severity of the abiotic environment, and the competitive milieu in edge populations. Models for the joint evolution of mating and dispersal in plants suggest that although selfing may evolve at range limits, it will not necessarily be associated with high dispersal. Empirical evidence to test these predictions is scarce. Geographic surveys of dispersal traits, mating-system traits and relevant selective factors are needed, especially studies of: (i) stable range limits that identify underlying environmental gradients; (ii) moving range limits that compare traits across space and time; and (iii) contracting limits that assess variation in local adaptation towards the range edge.
C1 [Hargreaves, Anna L.; Eckert, Christopher G.] Queens Univ, Dept Biol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
C3 Queens University - Canada
RP Hargreaves, AL (corresponding author), Queens Univ, Dept Biol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
EM alhargreaves@gmail.com
OI Hargreaves, Anna/0000-0001-9680-9696
FU Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
   Discovery Grant; International Order of Daughters of the Empire (IODE)
   doctoral scholarship
FX We thank Joe Bailey for inviting this contribution and helpful editorial
   suggestions, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments. This
   research was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research
   Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant to C.G.E and an International
   Order of Daughters of the Empire (IODE) doctoral scholarship to A.L.H.
   The authors have no conflict of interest regarding this publication.
CR Anderson BJ, 2009, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V276, P1415, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2008.1681
   Anderson SJ, 2008, ECOL ENTOMOL, V33, P638, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2008.01013.x
   [Anonymous], 1996, PHILOS T R SOC B
   [Anonymous], 1972, GEOGRAPHICAL ECOLOGY
   Arim M, 2006, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V103, P374, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0504272102
   Atkins KE, 2010, J THEOR BIOL, V266, P449, DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.07.014
   Auld JR, 2013, EVOL BIOL, V40, P185, DOI 10.1007/s11692-012-9202-7
   BAKER HG, 1955, EVOLUTION, V9, P347, DOI 10.2307/2405656
   BAKER HG, 1967, EVOLUTION, V21, P853, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1967.tb03440.x
   BARRETT SCH, 1989, EVOLUTION, V43, P1398, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02591.x
   BARRETT SCH, 1987, EVOLUTION, V41, P340, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05802.x
   Barringer BC, 2012, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V25, P1200, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02510.x
   Bataillon T, 2000, GENET RES, V75, P75, DOI 10.1017/S0016672399004048
   BENGTSSON BO, 1978, J THEOR BIOL, V73, P439, DOI 10.1016/0022-5193(78)90151-0
   Bénichou O, 2012, PHYS REV E, V86, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.041908
   Bonte D, 2012, BIOL REV, V87, P290, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00201.x
   Brooker RW, 2007, J THEOR BIOL, V245, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.09.033
   Burrows MT, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P652, DOI 10.1126/science.1210288
   Burton OJ, 2010, ECOL LETT, V13, P1210, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01505.x
   Busch JW, 2011, EVOLUTION, V65, P1511, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01224.x
   Busch JW, 2005, AM J BOT, V92, P1503, DOI 10.3732/ajb.92.9.1503
   Button L, 2012, INT J PLANT SCI, V173, P251, DOI 10.1086/663972
   Byers DL, 1999, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V30, P479, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.479
   CHARLESWORTH D, 1987, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V18, P237, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.18.1.237
   Cheptou PO, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P3796, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0708446105
   Cheptou PO, 2011, NEW PHYTOL, V189, P395, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03541.x
   Cheptou PO, 2009, AM NAT, V174, P46, DOI 10.1086/599303
   Cheptou PO, 2004, EVOLUTION, V58, P2613
   Cheptou PO, 2003, AM NAT, V162, P744, DOI 10.1086/378902
   Cheptou PO, 2001, AM J BOT, V88, P1424, DOI 10.2307/3558449
   Cobben MMP, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P2419, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02711.x
   Cody ML, 1996, J ECOL, V84, P53, DOI 10.2307/2261699
   CONNELL J H, 1971, P298
   Cousens R, 2008, DISPERSAL IN PLANTS: A POPULATION PERSPECTIVE, P1
   Cousens R, 2008, DISPERSAL IN PLANTS: A POPULATION PERSPECTIVE, P113
   CWYNAR LC, 1987, AM NAT, V129, P463, DOI 10.1086/284651
   Darling E, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V178, P424, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02349.x
   Dart SR, 2012, ANN BOT-LONDON, V109, P599, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcr266
   DENNO RF, 1992, ECOLOGY, V73, P1323, DOI 10.2307/1940679
   Donohue K, 1999, AM NAT, V154, P674, DOI 10.1086/303273
   Dytham C, 2009, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V276, P1407, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2008.1535
   Ebert D, 2002, SCIENCE, V295, P485, DOI 10.1126/science.1067485
   Eckert CG, 2008, MOL ECOL, V17, P1170, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03659.x
   Eckert C.G., 2006, ECOLOGY EVOLUTION FL
   Eckert CG, 2001, EVOL ECOL, V15, P501, DOI 10.1023/A:1016005519651
   ECKERT CG, 1994, EVOLUTION, V48, P952, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb05285.x
   Eckert CG, 2002, INT J PLANT SCI, V163, P123, DOI 10.1086/324179
   Eckert CG, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.013
   Excoffier L, 2009, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V40, P481, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173414
   Fausto JA, 2001, AM J BOT, V88, P1794, DOI 10.2307/3558355
   Fisher RA, 1941, ANN EUGENIC, V11, P53, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1941.tb02272.x
   Fox CW, 2011, EVOLUTION, V65, P246, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01108.x
   Gandon S, 1999, J THEOR BIOL, V200, P345, DOI 10.1006/jtbi.1999.0994
   Glémin S, 2003, EVOLUTION, V57, P2678
   Goodwillie C, 2005, INT J PLANT SCI, V166, P741, DOI 10.1086/431801
   Gros A, 2006, OIKOS, V114, P544, DOI 10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14909.x
   Haag CR, 2005, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V272, P2449, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2005.3235
   HAMILTON WD, 1977, NATURE, V269, P578, DOI 10.1038/269578a0
   Hampe A, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P461, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00739.x
   Hanski I, 2004, ECOL LETT, V7, P958, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00654.x
   HANSKI I, 1991, BIOL J LINN SOC, V42, P17, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00549.x
   Hanski I, 2011, ECOL LETT, V14, P1025, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01671.x
   Hassall C, 2008, EUR J ENTOMOL, V105, P939, DOI 10.14411/eje.2008.120
   Hegland SJ, 2009, ECOL LETT, V12, P184, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01269.x
   Herlihy CR, 2005, AM J BOT, V92, P744, DOI 10.3732/ajb.92.4.744
   Hill JK, 2011, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V56, P143, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144746
   Hochkirch A, 2009, BIOL J LINN SOC, V97, P118, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01199.x
   HOFFMANN AA, 1994, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V9, P223, DOI 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90248-8
   Holt RD, 2003, EVOL ECOL RES, V5, P159
   Holt RD, 2005, OIKOS, V108, P18, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13147.x
   Holt RD, 2000, ECOL LETT, V3, P41, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00116.x
   Hughes CL, 2007, ECOL ENTOMOL, V32, P437, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00890.x
   JANZEN DH, 1970, AM NAT, V104, P501, DOI 10.1086/282687
   Jump AS, 2009, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V24, P694, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.007
   Keane RM, 2002, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V17, P164, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02499-0
   Keller SR, 2008, ECOL LETT, V11, P852, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01188.x
   Kirkpatrick M, 1997, AM NAT, V150, P1, DOI 10.1086/286054
   Kirkpatrick M, 2000, AM NAT, V155, P154, DOI 10.1086/303312
   Kubisch A, 2011, ECOGRAPHY, V34, P1002, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06744.x
   Kubisch A, 2011, EVOL ECOL RES, V13, P159
   Kubisch A, 2010, ECOLOGY, V91, P3094, DOI 10.1890/09-2022.1
   LANDE R, 1985, EVOLUTION, V39, P24, DOI [10.2307/2408514, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb04077.x]
   Léotard G, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0005377
   Levin DA, 2012, ANN BOT-LONDON, V109, P613, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcr159
   LLOYD DAVID G., 1965, CONTRIB GRAY HERB HARVARD UNIV, V195, P3
   LLOYD DG, 1992, INT J PLANT SCI, V153, P370, DOI 10.1086/297041
   Massol F, 2011, EVOLUTION, V65, P591, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01134.x
   Mathias A, 2001, EVOLUTION, V55, P246
   McInerny G, 2007, ECOL INFORM, V2, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2006.12.001
   MCPEEK MA, 1992, AM NAT, V140, P1010, DOI 10.1086/285453
   Memmott J, 2007, ECOL LETT, V10, P710, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01061.x
   Moeller DA, 2006, ECOLOGY, V87, P1510, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1510:GSOPCR]2.0.CO;2
   Moeller DA, 2005, EVOLUTION, V59, P786, DOI 10.1554/04-656
   Moeller DA, 2012, ECOLOGY, V93, P1036, DOI 10.1890/11-1462.1
   Monty A, 2010, OIKOS, V119, P1563, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.17769.x
   Morgan MT, 2005, AM NAT, V166, P169, DOI 10.1086/431317
   Morgan MT, 2005, EVOLUTION, V59, P1143, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01050.x
   Morgan MT, 2002, HEREDITY, V89, P253, DOI 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800143
   Mustin K, 2009, OIKOS, V118, P131, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17025.x
   NIEMELA J, 1991, OIKOS, V62, P351, DOI 10.2307/3545500
   Niemela Jari, 1999, Diversity and Distributions, V5, P121, DOI 10.1046/j.1472-4642.1999.00048.x
   Ohmura A, 2012, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V110, P499, DOI 10.1007/s00704-012-0687-x
   Pannell JR, 1998, EVOLUTION, V52, P657, DOI [10.2307/2411261, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb03691.x]
   Pannell JR, 2001, THEOR POPUL BIOL, V59, P145, DOI 10.1006/tpbi.2000.1496
   Parmesan C, 2006, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V37, P637, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
   PEASE CM, 1989, ECOLOGY, V70, P1657, DOI 10.2307/1938100
   PERONI PA, 1994, AM J BOT, V81, P1428, DOI 10.2307/2445316
   Phillips BL, 2012, J BIOGEOGR, V39, P153, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02597.x
   Phillips BL, 2008, AM NAT, V172, pS34, DOI 10.1086/588255
   Phillips BL, 2006, NATURE, V439, P803, DOI 10.1038/439803a
   Piquot Y, 1998, OIKOS, V82, P139, DOI 10.2307/3546924
   Poethke HJ, 2007, EVOL ECOL RES, V9, P41
   Poethke HJ, 2003, AM NAT, V161, P631, DOI 10.1086/368224
   Porcher E, 2005, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V18, P497, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00905.x
   PRICE SC, 1981, OECOLOGIA, V49, P283, DOI 10.1007/BF00349202
   Pujol B, 2006, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V19, P85, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00990.x
   Pujol B, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P15379, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0902257106
   Sagarin RD, 2002, ECOL LETT, V5, P137, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00297.x
   Samis KE, 2007, ECOLOGY, V88, P1747, DOI 10.1890/06-1153.1
   SCHEMSKE DW, 1983, EVOLUTION, V37, P523, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05569.x
   SCHMITT J, 1990, EVOLUTION, V44, P2022, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb04308.x
   SCHMITT J, 1990, EVOLUTION, V44, P269, DOI [10.2307/2409406, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05197.x]
   SCHOEN DJ, 1982, EVOLUTION, V36, P352, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05051.x
   SCHOEN DJ, 1991, EVOLUTION, V45, P1651, DOI [10.2307/2409786, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb02670.x]
   Sexton JP, 2009, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V40, P415, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120317
   Shine R, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P5708, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1018989108
   Simmons AD, 2004, AM NAT, V164, P378, DOI 10.1086/423430
   Solbrig O.T., 1980, DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS, P67
   Sun S, 2012, EVOL ECOL, V26, P771, DOI 10.1007/s10682-011-9549-8
   Takebayashi N, 2001, AM J BOT, V88, P1143, DOI 10.2307/3558325
   Thomas CD, 2001, NATURE, V411, P577, DOI 10.1038/35079066
   Thomas CD, 2000, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V267, P139, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2000.0978
   Thomas CD, 2006, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V21, P415, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.012
   Travis JMJ, 2002, EVOL ECOL RES, V4, P1119
   Travis JMJ, 1999, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V266, P723, DOI 10.1098/rspb.1999.0696
   Travis JMJ, 2012, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V3, P628, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00193.x
   Travis JMJ, 2009, J THEOR BIOL, V259, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.03.008
   Van Kleunen M, 2007, CONSERV BIOL, V21, P1537, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00765.x
   VANDENBOSCH F, 1992, J BIOGEOGR, V19, P135, DOI 10.2307/2845500
   VANTREUREN R, 1993, EVOLUTION, V47, P1669, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01259.x
   VENABLE DL, 1988, AM NAT, V131, P360, DOI 10.1086/284795
   Vergeer P, 2013, NEW PHYTOL, V197, P989, DOI 10.1111/nph.12060
   Willi Y, 2007, EVOL ECOL RES, V9, P959
   Winn AA, 2011, EVOLUTION, V65, P3339, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01462.x
   WOLFE LM, 1993, EVOLUTION, V47, P374, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb02100.x
   Wyatt R, 1988, PLANT EVOLUTIONARY B, P109
   YAHARA T, 1992, EVOLUTION, V46, P557, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb02059.x
   Yakimowski SB, 2007, CONSERV BIOL, V21, P811, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00684.x
NR 148
TC 121
Z9 139
U1 0
U2 224
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0269-8463
EI 1365-2435
J9 FUNCT ECOL
JI Funct. Ecol.
PD FEB
PY 2014
VL 28
IS 1
SI SI
BP 5
EP 21
DI 10.1111/1365-2435.12170
PG 17
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA AA4RN
UT WOS:000331083900003
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU San Martin, VA
   Lavín, FV
   Oliva, RDP
   Lerdón, XP
   Rivera, A
   Serramalera, L
   Gelcich, S
AF San Martin, Valeska A.
   Vasquez Lavin, Felipe
   Ponce Oliva, Roberto D.
   Paz Lerdon, Ximena
   Rivera, Antonella
   Serramalera, Leticia
   Gelcich, Stefan
TI Exploring the adaptive capacity of the mussel mariculture industry in
   Chile
SO AQUACULTURE
LA English
DT Article
DE Aquaculture; Environmental variability; Climate change; Contingent
   behaviour; Vulnerability; Human dimension
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; OCEAN ACIDIFICATION; NATIONAL LEVEL; SEED PRODUCERS;
   VULNERABILITY; AQUACULTURE; ADAPTATION; IMPACTS; VARIABILITY; PATTERNS
AB Societies have adapted to climate and environmental variability throughout history. However, projected climate change poses multiple risks to mariculture because of the increased frequency of environmental threats that lie outside the realm of present day experience. Adaptive capacity evaluated in this study is a characteristic that would reflect mariculture industries ability to anticipate and respond to these changes, and to minimize, cope with, and recover from the consequences and take advantage of new opportunities arising from change. Drawing on a survey to 90 mussel mariculture companies in Chiloe-Chile, we have characterized the way the industry has adapted and recovered from specific stressors in productive capacity, namely; reduced mussel growth rates and reduced larval supply. We additionally assess determinants of the mussel industry's willingness to invest in building capacity to anticipate changes through analysing mussel aquaculture companies' assets to draw upon in times of need (capital; access to credit), the flexibility to change strategies, the companies' perception of the industry's social organization to act collectively (social capital), and their response to hypothetical scenarios regarding shocks in productive capacity. Results show heterogeneity in production decisions when facing environmental stressors. Results also show that the industry adapts in heterogeneous ways and that financial assets and social capital drive willingness to invest in adaptive capacity. Understanding past adaptation strategies and the willingness of the industry to invest in anticipating stressors allows us to begin exploring the consequences of new stressors. Importantly, as Chile and other countries are developing adaptation plans to face the multiple stressors of climate change, information about stakeholders' existing adaptation strategies and their determinants is becoming a critical bottleneck to inform these processes and assure they are in line with stakeholder needs and interest. While we use the Chilean mussel industry as a working example, the approach presented can inform other countries/regions wishing to explore the adaptive capacity of their aquaculture sectors.
C1 [San Martin, Valeska A.] Univ Concepcion, Dept Econ, Concepcion, Chile.
   [Vasquez Lavin, Felipe; Ponce Oliva, Roberto D.] Univ Desarrollo, Sch Econ & Business, Concepcion, Chile.
   [San Martin, Valeska A.; Vasquez Lavin, Felipe; Ponce Oliva, Roberto D.; Serramalera, Leticia; Gelcich, Stefan] Univ Concepcion, Ctr Study Multiple Drivers Marine Socioecol Syst, Concepcion, Chile.
   [Vasquez Lavin, Felipe; Ponce Oliva, Roberto D.; Rivera, Antonella; Serramalera, Leticia; Gelcich, Stefan] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Ctr Appl Ecol & Sustainabil CAPES, Santiago, Chile.
   [Vasquez Lavin, Felipe; Gelcich, Stefan] Millennium Nucleus Ctr Socioecon Impact Environm, Santiago, Chile.
   [Paz Lerdon, Ximena] Bio Bio Univ, Sch Business Sci, Dept Econ & Finance, Concepcion, Chile.
   [Rivera, Antonella] Coral Reef Alliance, 1330 Broadway,Suite 600, Oakland, CA 94612 USA.
C3 Universidad de Concepcion; Universidad del Desarrollo; Universidad de
   Concepcion; Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
RP San Martin, VA (corresponding author), Univ Concepcion, Dept Econ, Concepcion, Chile.
EM valezkasanmartin@gmail.com
RI Rivera, Antonella/AAM-7428-2021; Gelcich, Stefan/LSL-2212-2024; Lavin,
   Felipe/AAF-7373-2020; Ponce, Roberto/AAG-1061-2020
OI San Martin, Valeska/0000-0002-8485-8578; Ponce, Roberto
   D./0000-0001-5024-7456; Vasquez Lavin, Felipe/0000-0002-0767-998X
FU Millennium Nucleus "Center for the Study of Multiple-drivers on Marine
   Socio-Ecological Systems (MUSELS)" [MINECON NC120086]; Conicyt Basal
   [0002-2014]; Chilean National Commission of Scientific and Technological
   Research CONICYT [21151027]
FX The research leading to these results has received funding from the
   Millennium Nucleus "Center for the Study of Multiple-drivers on Marine
   Socio-Ecological Systems (MUSELS)" funded by MINECON NC120086. FVL, RDP
   and SG thanks to Conicyt Basal 0002-2014 (CAPES). During the analysis
   and preparation of the manuscript, VASM was supported by a Doctorate
   Fellowship awarded by the Chilean National Commission of Scientific and
   Technological Research CONICYT No 21151027.
CR Adams CM, 2011, J WORLD AQUACULT SOC, V42, P242, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2011.00460.x
   Adger W. N., 2003, Progress in Development Studies, V3, P179, DOI 10.1191/1464993403ps060oa
   Adger WN, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
   Adger WN, 2005, CR GEOSCI, V337, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.crte.2004.11.004
   Allison E. H., 2011, WorldFish Center Working Paper
   Allison EH, 2009, FISH FISH, V10, P173, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00310.x
   AMEMIYA T, 1984, J ECONOMETRICS, V24, P3, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(84)90074-5
   [Anonymous], BAL GEST SECT AC NAC
   [Anonymous], ADAPTING CHANGING EN
   [Anonymous], 2005, PROJECT NO R4778J FI
   [Anonymous], MITILIDOS REGION LAG
   [Anonymous], ESTADO SITUACION PER
   [Anonymous], 1990, CULTIVO MOLUSCOS CHI
   [Anonymous], OPEN ACCESS J PUBLIC
   [Anonymous], VALUING ENV PREFEREN
   [Anonymous], 2017, TECHN WORKSH FAO ROM
   [Anonymous], 2018, M SUSTAINABLE DEV GO
   [Anonymous], 2008, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2006
   [Anonymous], 2016, Contributing to food security and nutrition for all, P200, DOI DOI 10.18356/D72EB315-EN
   Asche F, 2013, AQUACULT ECON MANAG, V17, P322, DOI 10.1080/13657305.2013.812156
   Avendaño M, 2011, LAT AM J AQUAT RES, V39, P416, DOI 10.3856/vol39-issue3-fulltext-3
   Badjeck MC, 2010, MAR POLICY, V34, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.08.007
   Bandura A, 2000, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V9, P75, DOI 10.1111/1467-8721.00064
   Barange M, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P211, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2119, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2119]
   Barria A, 2012, REV BIOL MAR OCEANOG, V47, P461, DOI 10.4067/S0718-19572012000300009
   Barton A, 2012, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V57, P698, DOI 10.4319/lo.2012.57.3.0698
   Bene C, 2015, FOOD SECUR, V7, P261, DOI 10.1007/s12571-015-0427-z
   Bibby R, 2008, AQUAT BIOL, V2, P67, DOI 10.3354/ab00037
   Brooks N, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.006
   Bustos B, 2019, ISL STUD J, V14, P97, DOI 10.24043/isj.91
   Caballero R, 2002, CLIM RES, V21, P127, DOI 10.3354/cr021127
   Cabello FC, 2016, REV CHIL INFECTOL, V33, P559, DOI 10.4067/S0716-10182016000500011
   Carpenter SR, 2001, BIOSCIENCE, V51, P451, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0451:CWCEAS]2.0.CO;2
   Carson RT, 2003, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V25, P257, DOI 10.1023/A:1024486702104
   Cinner JE, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P117, DOI 10.1038/s41558-017-0065-x
   Cinner JE, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P872, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2690
   Cinner JE, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.001
   Clement Alejandro, 2016, Harmful Algae News, V53, P1
   Cooley SR, 2012, FISH FISH, V13, P182, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00424.x
   Coulthard S, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-04483-170104
   Duarte CM, 2009, BIOSCIENCE, V59, P967, DOI 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.8
   Ekstrom JA, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P207, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2508
   Fenichel EP, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P237, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2871
   Fernández FJ, 2018, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V158, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.03.013
   Figueroa Y, 2016, AQUACULT ECON MANAG, V20, P283, DOI 10.1080/13657305.2016.1180647
   Gazeau F, 2010, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V7, P2051, DOI 10.5194/bg-7-2051-2010
   Goldburg RebeccaJ., 2001, Marine Aquaculture in the United States: Environmental Impacts and Policy Options
   Gonzalez-Poblete E, 2018, AQUACULTURE, V493, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.04.026
   Grothmann T, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002
   Handisyde N, 2017, FISH FISH, V18, P466, DOI 10.1111/faf.12186
   Hinkel J, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.08.002
   Hoyos D, 2010, PRAGUE ECON PAP, V19, P329, DOI 10.18267/j.pep.380
   Hughes S, 2012, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V23, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.012
   Kroeker KJ, 2016, ECOL LETT, V19, P771, DOI 10.1111/ele.12613
   Kundzewicz ZW, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P173
   Lara C, 2016, J MARINE SYST, V155, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2015.10.010
   Little LR, 2015, CLIM RISK MANAG, V8, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2015.02.002
   Little LR, 2014, CONSERV LETT, V7, P196, DOI 10.1111/conl.12041
   López DA, 2008, INT J ENVIRON POLLUT, V33, P401, DOI 10.1504/IJEP.2008.020570
   Mascareno A, 2018, ECOL SOC, V23, DOI 10.5751/ES-10300-230415
   Menge BA, 2009, ECOL MONOGR, V79, P379, DOI 10.1890/08-2086.1
   Monfort M.-C., 2014, Globefish Res. Programme, V115, P2014
   Moser C, 2011, ENVIRON URBAN, V23, P463, DOI 10.1177/0956247811418739
   Parker Laura M., 2013, Biology - Basel, V2, P651, DOI 10.3390/biology2020651
   Oliva RDP, 2019, ECOL ECON, V158, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.011
   Range P, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, pS19, DOI 10.1007/s10113-013-0478-7
   Rivera A, 2017, AQUACULTURE, V479, P423, DOI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.06.015
   Gallo GS, 2016, CULT HIST DIGIT J, V5, DOI 10.3989/chdj.2016.005
   Sainsbury NC, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P896, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0645-z
   San Martin VA, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-41104-5
NR 70
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 2
U2 39
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0044-8486
EI 1873-5622
J9 AQUACULTURE
JI Aquaculture
PD MAR 30
PY 2020
VL 519
AR 734856
DI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734856
PG 8
WC Fisheries; Marine & Freshwater Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Fisheries; Marine & Freshwater Biology
GA KJ1RQ
UT WOS:000511835000045
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sicardi, M
   García-Préchac, F
   Frioni, L
AF Sicardi, M
   García-Préchac, F
   Frioni, L
TI Soil microbial indicators sensitive to land use conversion from pastures
   to commercial <i>Eucalyptus grandis</i> (Hill ex Maiden) plantations in
   Uruguay
SO APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE bioindicators; soil microbial biomass; soil enzymes; Eucalyptus grandis;
   grassland; land use
ID ORGANIC-MATTER; ENZYME-ACTIVITIES; BIOMASS; QUALITY; TILLAGE; CARBON;
   HEALTH
AB Commercial forest plantations have increased during the last decade in Uruguay in soils of low cropping capability. Eucalyptus grandis (Hill ex Maiden) has been the main species planted due to its fast growth and adaptability to climate fluctuations. Assuming that the conversion from natural grazed pastures to commercial Eucalyptus plantations generates significant changes in the soil biological properties, we compared microbial enumeration and variables directly related to microbial activity to characterize these changes, as well as to determine the extent to which these soil biological properties change seasonally and with soil depth. The soil use conversion from pasture to forest land did not have a significant effect on the number of cellulolytic aerobes, P-solubilizers and Azotobacter spp. communities. Soil respiration, the C-mineralization coefficient, dehydrogenase, fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis and acid and alkaline phosphatase activities were affected significantly. Microbial enumeration of cellulolytics, P-solubilizers and Azotobacter spp., and parameters related to microbial biomass, soil respiration and the C-mineralization coefficient showed marked effects of sampling season. This, however, was not the case for the relative levels of the enzyme activities evaluated. These results indicated that the enzyme activities evaluated were sensitive and reliable indicators of the biochenucal changes generated by the soil use change. Spring appeared to be a better time for sampling than summer or winter because enzyme activities tended to be higher. Soil sampling depth was shown to be an important factor for obtaining consistent results, especially for the measurement of enzyme activities. For the last indicators, as well as the others, better results were obtained sampling and analyzing the upper 10 cm of the mineral soil profile. Our work suggested that microbial biomass, soil respiration, and enzyme activities are useful tools to assess biological soil quality changes due to the conversion of pasture land to planted E. grandis forest. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
C1 Univ Republ Oriental Uruguay, Fac Ciencias, CIN, Lab Microbiol Suelos, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay.
   Univ Republ Oriental Uruguay, Fac Agron, Lab Manejo & Conservac Suelos & Aguas, Dept Suelos & Aguas, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay.
   Univ Republ Oriental Uruguay, Fac Agron, Microbiol Lab, Dept Biol Vegetal, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay.
C3 Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay; Universidad de la Republica,
   Uruguay; Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay
RP Univ Republ Oriental Uruguay, Fac Ciencias, CIN, Lab Microbiol Suelos, Igua 4225, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay.
EM sicardi@adinet.com.uy
CR Alef K, 1998, METHODS APPL SOIL MI, P232
   Bergstrom DW, 1998, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V62, P1286, DOI 10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200050020x
   BIDEGAIN MP, 2001, P 3 INT C LAND DEGR
   Brown AHF, 1992, SPECIAL PUBLICATION, V11, P125
   BRUSSA CA, 1994, EUCALYPTUS ESPECIE C
   BUCHANAN M, 1992, BIOL FERT SOILS, V13, P211, DOI 10.1007/BF00340578
   Caldwell BA, 1999, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V31, P1603, DOI 10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00067-X
   CARTER MR, 1991, BIOL FERT SOILS, V11, P135, DOI 10.1007/BF00336378
   DORAN JW, 1997, BIOL INDICATORS SOIL, P2
   Durak E, 2001, ACSMS HEALTH FIT J, V5, P6
   GOMAR EP, 1992, REV INIA INVESTIGACI, V2, P205
   GREGORICH EG, 1994, CAN J SOIL SCI, V74, P367, DOI 10.4141/cjss94-051
   HILL TCJ, 1993, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V25, P1779, DOI 10.1016/0038-0717(93)90183-C
   ICK RP, 1997, BIOL INDICATORS SOIL, P121
   JENKINSON DS, 1976, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V8, P209, DOI 10.1016/0038-0717(76)90005-5
   JORDAN D, 1995, BIOL FERT SOILS, V19, P297, DOI 10.1007/BF00336098
   Kandeler E, 1999, BIOL FERT SOILS, V28, P343, DOI 10.1007/s003740050502
   Kennedy AC, 1997, SOIL SCI, V162, P607, DOI 10.1097/00010694-199709000-00002
   MUSTO JW, 1994, IMPACTS PLANTATION F, P60
   Pankhurst C. E., 1997, P419
   POWLSON DS, 1987, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V19, P159, DOI 10.1016/0038-0717(87)90076-9
   PRIN Y, 1989, AGRON TROP, V44, P13
   Reeves DW, 1997, SOIL TILL RES, V43, P131, DOI 10.1016/S0167-1987(97)00038-X
   RONI L, 1999, PROCESOS MICROBIANOS, V2, P235
   SARATHCHANDRA SU, 1989, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V21, P987, DOI 10.1016/0038-0717(89)90034-5
   Schinner F., 1996, METHODS SOIL BIOL
   Smith OH, 2000, ADV AGRON, V69, P75
   Statistical Analysis Systems (SAS), 1996, Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, V5th ed.
   Taylor JP, 2002, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V34, P387, DOI 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00199-7
   van Bruggen AHC, 2000, APPL SOIL ECOL, V15, P13, DOI 10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00068-8
   Yakovchenko V, 1996, BIOL FERT SOILS, V21, P245, DOI 10.1007/BF00334899
NR 31
TC 97
Z9 126
U1 2
U2 63
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0929-1393
EI 1873-0272
J9 APPL SOIL ECOL
JI Appl. Soil Ecol.
PD OCT
PY 2004
VL 27
IS 2
BP 125
EP 133
DI 10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.05.004
PG 9
WC Soil Science
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA 868XO
UT WOS:000224946600003
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Deng, HJ
   Zhang, SR
   Chen, MH
   Feng, JL
   Liu, K
AF Deng, Haojian
   Zhang, Shiran
   Chen, Minghui
   Feng, Jiali
   Liu, Kai
TI Sensitivity of Local Climate Zones and Urban Functional Zones to
   Multi-Scenario Surface Urban Heat Islands
SO REMOTE SENSING
LA English
DT Article
DE local climate zone (LCZ); urban functional zone (UFZ); multi-scenario;
   surface urban heat island (SUHI); sensitivity
ID TEMPERATURE; MORPHOLOGY; ALGORITHM; TRENDS; CHINA; SCALE
AB Local climate zones (LCZs) and urban functional zones (UFZs) can intricately depict the multidimensional spatial elements of cities, offering a comprehensive perspective for understanding the surface urban heat island (SUHI) effect. In this study, we retrieved two types of land surface temperature (LST) data and constructed 12 SUHI scenarios over the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Central region using six SUHI identification methods. It compared the SUHI sensitivity differences among different types of LCZ and UFZ to analyze the global and local sensitivity differences of influencing factors in the 12 SUHI scenarios by utilizing the spatial gradient boosting trees, geographically weighted regression, and the coefficient of variation model. Results showed the following: (1) The sensitivity of different LCZ and UFZ types to multi-scenario SUHI was significantly affected by differences in SUHI identification methods and non-urban references. (2) In the morning, the shading effect of building clusters reduced the surface urban heat island intensity (SUHII) of some built environment types (such as LCZ 1 (compact high-rise zone) to LCZ 5 (open midrise zone)). The SUHIIs of LCZ E (bare rock or paved zone) and LCZ 10 (industry zone) were 4.22 degrees C and 3.87 degrees C, respectively, and both are classified as highly sensitive to SUHI. (3) The sensitivity of SUHI influencing factors exhibited regional variability, with importance differences in the sensitivity of importance for factors such as the impervious surface ratio, elevation, average building height, vegetation coverage, and average building volume between LCZs and UFZs. Amongst the 12 SUHI scenarios, an average of 87.43% and 89.97% of areas in LCZs and UFZs, respectively, were found to have low spatial sensitivity types. Overall, this study helps urban planners and managers gain a more comprehensive understanding of the complexity of the SUHI effect in high-density cities, providing a scientific basis for future urban climate adaptability planning.
C1 [Deng, Haojian; Liu, Kai] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Shiran] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Architecture, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Minghui] Dongguan Geog Informat & Planning Res Ctr, Dongguan 523000, Peoples R China.
   [Feng, Jiali] Shenzhen Inst Meteorol Innovat, Guangdong Hong Kong Macao Greater Bay Area Weather, Shenzhen 518000, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Kai] Guangdong Prov Key Lab Urbanizat & Geosimulat, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Kai] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Guangdong Prov Engn Res Ctr Publ Secur & Disaster, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Kai] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab, Zhuhai 519000, Peoples R China.
C3 Sun Yat Sen University; University of Hong Kong; Sun Yat Sen University
RP Feng, JL (corresponding author), Shenzhen Inst Meteorol Innovat, Guangdong Hong Kong Macao Greater Bay Area Weather, Shenzhen 518000, Peoples R China.
EM denghj9@mail2.sysu.edu.cn; zsr@stu.scau.edu.cn; cmhgis@126.com;
   jxf545@gbamwf.com; liuk6@mail.sysu.edu.cn
RI chen, minghui/KFR-8832-2024; Zhang, Shiran/L-2785-2013; feng,
   Jiali/AAG-5458-2021; Liu, Kai/K-7307-2015
OI Haojian, Deng/0000-0003-3724-8571; feng, jiali/0000-0002-8082-5525; Liu,
   Kai/0000-0002-1829-7557
FU Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission; National Natural
   Science Foundation of China [42205088, 42201353]; Innovation Group
   Project of Southern Marine Science and Engineering, Guangdong Laboratory
   (Zhuhai) [311021004];  [KCXFZ20230731094905010]
FX This research was funded by Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation
   Commission [grant number KCXFZ20230731094905010], National Natural
   Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 42205088, 42201353], and the
   Innovation Group Project of Southern Marine Science and Engineering,
   Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai) [grant numbers 311021004].
CR [Anonymous], 2019, WORLD URBANIZATION P
   [Anonymous], 2022, ArcGIS Pro: Release 3.0
   BALCHIN WGV, 1947, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V73, P297, DOI 10.1002/qj.49707331706
   Chakraborty T, 2019, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V74, P269, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2018.09.015
   Chen Y, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104374
   Chow WTL, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P517, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00011.1
   Clinton N, 2013, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V134, P294, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2013.03.008
   Deng HJ, 2024, GEO-SPAT INF SCI, DOI 10.1080/10095020.2024.2336593
   Deng HJ, 2023, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V149, DOI 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4160
   Deng HJ, 2021, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V147, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000735
   Dong P, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V218, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109105
   Du C, 2015, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V7, P647, DOI 10.3390/rs70100647
   Elith J, 2008, J ANIM ECOL, V77, P802, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x
   Feng RD, 2021, ENVIRON INT, V157, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106857
   Fernandes R, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15040884
   Fischer E, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V346, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131210
   Fotheringham A.S., 2009, The SAGE Handbook of Spatial Analysis, P243, DOI [https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020130.n13, DOI 10.4135/9780857020130.N13]
   FOTHERINGHAM AS, 1991, ENVIRON PLANN A, V23, P1025, DOI 10.1068/a231025
   Gao YJ, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104443
   Gehlke CE, 1934, J AM STAT ASSOC, V29, P169, DOI 10.2307/2277827
   Geletic J, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V156, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.04.011
   Geng XL, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104303
   Gong P, 2020, SCI BULL, V65, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2019.12.007
   Gu YF, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V24, P982, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2017.12.001
   Han DR, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105588
   Han J, 2020, COMPLEXITY, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/8820338
   Hou HR, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V829, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154710
   Hu D, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V706, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135244
   Huang X, 2021, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102255
   Huang X, 2019, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V152, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.010
   Imhoff ML, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P504, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2009.10.008
   Jia Wu, 2019, Journal of Electronic Science and Technology, V17, P26, DOI 10.11989/JEST.1674-862X.80904120
   [江斯达 Jiang Sida], 2020, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V75, P1860
   [江颂 Jiang Song], 2022, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V77, P2249
   Lai JM, 2018, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V217, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.021
   Li KN, 2022, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V271, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2022.112898
   Li YF, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103146
   Li YF, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-16461-9
   Liao W, 2021, ENERG BUILDINGS, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111027
   Liao WL, 2017, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/rs9030250
   Lin AQ, 2024, URBAN CLIM, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101787
   Liu HM, 2023, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V296, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113735
   Liu HM, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102987
   Liu J, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102698
   Liu Q, 2024, URBAN CLIM, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2024.102046
   Liu SJ, 2020, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V164, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.04.008
   Manoli G, 2019, NATURE, V573, P55, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1512-9
   [毛克彪 Mao Kebiao], 2005, [武汉大学学报. 信息科学版, Geomatics and information science of wuhan university.], V30, P703
   Mo N, 2024, BUILD ENVIRON, V247, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.111042
   OKE TR, 1982, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V108, P1, DOI 10.1002/qj.49710845502
   Qin ZH., 2004, Remote Sensing for Land Resources, V16, P28
   Quanz JA, 2018, CLIMATE, V6, DOI 10.3390/cli6010005
   Ren HZ, 2015, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V120, P1723, DOI 10.1002/2014JD022619
   SBPRC (Statistics Bureau of the Peoples Republic of China), 2020, China Urban Statistics Yearbook
   SEEMCS (Shenzhen Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center Station), DB4403/T 193-2021 Technical Specification of Urban Heat Island Effect Monitoring by Remote Sensing
   SHANNON CE, 1948, BELL SYST TECH J, V27, P379, DOI 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
   Snoek J., 2012, Advances in neural information processing systems, P2951, DOI DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1206.2944
   Stewart ID, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P1879, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00019.1
   Sun Yan-wei, 2021, Huanjing Kexue, V42, P501, DOI 10.13227/j.hjkx.202006009
   United Nations, UN Sustainable Development Goals, DOI 10.1017/9781009106559
   Wang YF, 2022, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V179, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106063
   Wu BW, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105599
   Wu ZF, 2019, ENVIRON REV, V27, P241, DOI 10.1139/er-2018-0029
   Xie ZQ, 2022, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V49, DOI 10.1029/2022GL099117
   Xu D, 2024, BUILD ENVIRON, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.111072
   Yang J, 2021, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V13, P3907, DOI 10.5194/essd-13-3907-2021
   [杨智威 Yang Zhiwei], 2019, [资源科学, Resources Science], V41, P1154
   Yao R, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V89, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.044
   Yao R, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V609, P742, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.217
   Yuan B, 2023, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V204, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.08.012
   Yuan Y, 2022, ENVIRON INT, V170, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107574
   Zhang YT, 2021, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/atmos12101271
   Zhou DC, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074009
NR 73
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 23
U2 23
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2072-4292
J9 REMOTE SENS-BASEL
JI Remote Sens.
PD AUG
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 16
AR 3048
DI 10.3390/rs16163048
PG 27
WC Environmental Sciences; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Remote Sensing;
   Imaging Science & Photographic Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geology; Remote Sensing; Imaging
   Science & Photographic Technology
GA E7L0G
UT WOS:001304770800001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Patel, SK
   Sharma, A
   Barla, A
   Singh, GS
AF Patel, Sanoj Kumar
   Sharma, Anil
   Barla, Anil
   Singh, Gopal Shankar
TI Assessing Morphological and Physiological Crop Functional Traits of
   Underutilized Crops in Response to Different Nutrient Amendments in
   Vindhyan Highlands, India
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptation; Crop functional traits (CFTs); Food security; Production
   sustainability; Underutilized crops
ID WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; TROPICAL DRY FOREST; SPECIES COMPOSITION; DROUGHT
   STRESS; LEAF-AREA; PHOTOSYNTHETIC RATES; MATTER CONTENT; PLANTS; SOIL;
   GROWTH
AB The cultivated crop is frequently subjected to a variety of environmental challenges including drought, salinity, extreme temperature and low moisture levels. In which, drought stress is major factor, which significantly reduces crop survival and productivity, particularly in semi-arid region of the Vindhyan highlands. In response to this stress, millets and traditional crops have evolved a range of morphological and physiological adaptations to withstand these phenomenon. Therefore, the aim of this study is to characterize the morphological and physiological traits of underutilized crops under different nutrient amendments towards the dry conditions. A plot experiment with four treatments viz. control, compost, fertilizer and compost + fertilizer was conducted for eight crop landraces. The results demonstrate plant morpho-physiological traits as well as production were develop in accordance with following trends such as compost + fertilizer > fertilizer > compost > control. This trend was continued in percentage change of production and highest in white maize (41.97%) and ramrahar (36.93%) compared to control. Soil total nitrogen, organic carbon and available phosphate contents were shown a consistent increase from pre-sowing to post-harvest conditions for both cropping seasons in all the treatments. In the context of eco-physiological traits relation, PSR (Photosynthetic rate) was positively associated with plant height in black maize (R = 0.69 P < 0.01), baturi (R = 0.79 P < 0.01), masoor (R = 0.74 P < 0.01) and senduri (R = 0.78 P < 0.01). However, photosynthetic pigment such as, chl a (R = 0.66 P < 0.05) chl b (R = 0.78 P < 0.01) carotenoids (R = 0.71 P < 0.01) in white maize, while chla (R = 0.84 P < 0.001), chlb (R = 0.82 P < 0.01) and carotenoids (R = 0.76 P < 0.01) in baturi positively related with PSR. This study can help policymakers to make a climate-adaptive crop system for better production in dry climatic conditions and livelihood improvement of the local community.
C1 [Patel, Sanoj Kumar; Sharma, Anil; Barla, Anil; Singh, Gopal Shankar] Banaras Hindu Univ, Inst Environm & Sustainable Dev, Varanasi, India.
C3 Banaras Hindu University (BHU)
RP Singh, GS (corresponding author), Banaras Hindu Univ, Inst Environm & Sustainable Dev, Varanasi, India.
EM gopalsingh.bhu@gmail.com
RI Patel, Sanoj Kumar/JKI-0269-2023; Sharma, Anil/GQH-3607-2022
OI Singh, Gopal Shankar/0000-0002-5181-3613; Sharma,
   Anil/0000-0002-6430-0438
FU University Grants Commission, New Delhi
FX The authors would like to acknowledge Dean and Director of Institute of
   Environment & Sustainable Development, BHU, Varanasi for providing all
   the necessary facilities. We are also grateful to the Mr. Bholanath
   Kharwar to provide the agricultural land for plot experiments. SKP would
   like to acknowledge University Grants Commission, New Delhi for
   financial support in the form of fellowship.
CR Adejumo S. A., 2016, African Journal of Agricultural Research, V11, P661, DOI 10.5897/AJAR2015.9895
   Valenzuela-García AA, 2019, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/agriculture9100208
   Ali Muhammad Fraz, 2022, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, DOI 10.1007/s12517-022-10876-y
   Ali S, 2018, AGR WATER MANAGE, V201, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.01.017
   Allen DJ, 2001, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V6, P36, DOI 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01808-2
   ANDERSON JE, 1973, ECOLOGY, V54, P1220, DOI 10.2307/1934185
   Anisuzzaman M, 2021, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/agronomy11091830
   Anjum SA, 2017, ZEMDIRBYSTE, V104, P267, DOI 10.13080/z-a.2017.104.034
   Anjum SA, 2011, AFR J AGR RES, V6, P2026
   [Anonymous], 1999, SOIL TAX BAS SYST SO, V2nd, pWashington
   Ansari Waquar Akhter, 2019, Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia, V16, P697, DOI 10.13005/bbra/2785
   ARNON DI, 1949, PLANT PHYSIOL, V24, P1, DOI 10.1104/pp.24.1.1
   Azurita-Silva A, 2015, State of the Art Report on Quinoa Around the World, P157
   Banik P, 2006, J AGRON CROP SCI, V192, P331, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2006.00219.x
   Banik Pabitra, 2009, Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, V55, P285, DOI 10.1080/03650340802431277
   Basri MHA, 2016, ACTA AGR SCAND B-S P, V66, P534, DOI 10.1080/09064710.2016.1197307
   Bhindhu P. S., 1998, Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, V46, P86
   Blake L, 2000, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V56, P263, DOI 10.1023/A:1009841603931
   BOYER JS, 1982, SCIENCE, V218, P443, DOI 10.1126/science.218.4571.443
   Bremner J. M., 1965, Monographs of the American Society of Agronomists, V9, P1149
   Chaturvedi RK, 2017, J VEG SCI, V28, P997, DOI 10.1111/jvs.12547
   Chaturvedi RK, 2014, J SUSTAIN FOREST, V33, P729, DOI 10.1080/10549811.2014.925402
   Chaturvedi RK., 2010, PLANT FUNCTIONAL TRA, P1
   Chaves MM, 2009, ANN BOT-LONDON, V103, P551, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcn125
   Chun HC, 2021, J INTEGR AGR, V20, P2639, DOI 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63560-2
   Cornelissen JHC, 2003, AUST J BOT, V51, P335, DOI 10.1071/BT02124
   de la Riva EG, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0148788
   Demirevska K, 2009, ACTA PHYSIOL PLANT, V31, P1129, DOI 10.1007/s11738-009-0331-2
   Dubey PK, 2022, ECOL ENG, V177, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106551
   Fahad S, 2017, FRONT PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01147
   Fahad S, 2016, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V103, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.03.001
   Farhat N, 2016, ACTA PHYSIOL PLANT, V38, DOI 10.1007/s11738-016-2165-z
   Fu JinDong Fu JinDong, 2008, Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, V11, P75
   Ghosh A., 2016, Vegetos, V29, P25, DOI 10.5958/2229-4473.2016.00007.0
   GOWER ST, 1992, ECOL MONOGR, V62, P43, DOI 10.2307/2937170
   Hussain M, 2008, J AGRON CROP SCI, V194, P193, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00305.x
   Hussein MS, 2006, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V108, P322, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.01.035
   Impa SM, 2019, J CEREAL SCI, V86, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.jcs.2019.01.013
   Imran, 2021, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V788, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/788/1/012165
   Imran, 2018, Russian Agricultural Sciences, V44, P18, DOI 10.3103/S106836741801010X
   Imran KA., 2015, J CHEM RES, V7, P15
   Jun-Hao ET, 2016, TRENDS ENDOCRIN MET, V27, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.tem.2015.12.006
   Kanemura T.H., 2005, Japanese Journal Crop Science, V74, P238
   Kraft NJB, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P797, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1413650112
   Kumar A, 2021, PLANT SOIL, V465, P197, DOI 10.1007/s11104-021-05003-x
   Kumar S, 2023, FRONT FOR GLOB CHANG, V6, DOI 10.3389/ffgc.2023.1194076
   Li XQ, 2021, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/agriculture11060560
   Li YL, 2005, BOT BULL ACAD SINICA, V46, P127
   Liang XM, 2021, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V21, P2628, DOI 10.1007/s11368-021-02932-z
   MA BL, 1995, CROP SCI, V35, P1411, DOI 10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500050025x
   Mangena P., 2018, Plant, Abiotic Stress and Responses to Climate Change, DOI [10.5772/intechopen.72899, DOI 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.72899]
   Manivannan P, 2007, COLLOID SURFACE B, V59, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.05.002
   Morugán-Coronado A, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V655, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.174
   Muhammad Tahir Muhammad Tahir, 2009, Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, V7, P168
   Nayyar V.K., 2000, Long-term Soil Fertility Experiments in Rice-Wheat Cropping Systems, P68
   Nelson D. W., 1996, Methods of soil analysis. Part 3 - chemical methods., P961
   Ngara R, 2021, LIFE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/life11070704
   Olsen S. R., 1982, Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, P403
   Pandey V, 2015, RICE SCI, V22, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.rsci.2015.04.001
   Patel SK, 2023, ENVIRON MANAGE, DOI 10.1007/s00267-023-01880-3
   Patel SK, 2022, FRONT FOR GLOB CHANG, V5, DOI 10.3389/ffgc.2022.822320
   Patel SK, 2020, ENERGY ECOL ENVIRON, V5, P253, DOI 10.1007/s40974-020-00158-2
   Paudel S, 2014, J MT SCI-ENGL, V11, P1112, DOI 10.1007/s11629-013-2858-3
   Pavithra KS, 2020, PLANT PHYSIOL REP, V25, P418, DOI 10.1007/s40502-020-00525-5
   Phiri L.K., 2000, BIOL FERTIL TROP SOI, V1998, P40
   Praba ML, 2009, J AGRON CROP SCI, V195, P30, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00341.x
   Reich PB, 1997, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V94, P13730, DOI 10.1073/pnas.94.25.13730
   Reich PB, 1998, FUNCT ECOL, V12, P948, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00274.x
   Roy Shubhadeep, 2022, Vegetable Science, V49, P233
   Sahebi M, 2018, BIOMED RES INT, V2018, DOI 10.1155/2018/3158474
   Sarkar AK., 1998, LONG TERM SOIL FERTI, P112
   Shao HB, 2009, CRIT REV BIOTECHNOL, V29, P131, DOI 10.1080/07388550902869792
   Sharifi R. S., 2009, Research Journal of Biological Sciences, V4, P375
   SHARKEY TD, 1981, PLANT PHYSIOL, V68, P33, DOI 10.1104/pp.68.1.33
   Sharma A, 2023, J ASIA-PAC BIODIVERS, V16, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.japb.2022.11.004
   Sharma A, 2021, ENVIRON SUSTAIN, V4, P749, DOI 10.1007/s42398-021-00196-4
   Shipley B, 2006, FUNCT ECOL, V20, P565, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01135.x
   Shipley B, 2002, NEW PHYTOL, V153, P359, DOI 10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00320.x
   Singh A, 2023, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/agronomy13092318
   Singh A, 2019, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/agronomy9090491
   Singh A, 2018, CURR SCI INDIA, V115, P611, DOI 10.18520/cs/v115/i4/611-613
   Singh H, 2017, 3 BIOTECH, V7, DOI 10.1007/s13205-017-0690-0
   Singh JS, 2010, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V139, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2010.07.003
   SINGH JS, 1989, NATURE, V338, P499, DOI 10.1038/338499a0
   Singh R.P., 1990, SUSTAINABILITY PRACT, P5
   Singh R, 2020, ENERGY ECOL ENVIRON, V5, P171, DOI 10.1007/s40974-020-00159-1
   Singh R, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V105, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.043
   Stagnari F., 2016, Water stress and crop plants: a sustainable approach, P375
   Stoilova T., 2013, African Journal of Agricultural Research, V8, P208
   Tabassum S, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127109
   Nguyen TTN, 2017, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V17, P2763, DOI 10.1007/s11368-017-1839-5
   Turk M. A., 2003, African Journal of Range & Forage Science, V20, P239, DOI 10.2989/10220110309485820
   Turk MA, 2003, CROP PROT, V22, P673, DOI 10.1016/S0261-2194(02)00241-7
   Ullah A, 2021, FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S, V5, DOI 10.3389/fsufs.2021.618092
   Unkovich M, 2010, ADV AGRON, V105, P173, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2113(10)05005-4
   Wan LJ, 2021, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/agriculture11121207
   Wen XX, 2012, J INTEGR AGR, V11, P1119, DOI 10.1016/S2095-3119(12)60105-1
   Wright IJ, 2004, NATURE, V428, P821, DOI 10.1038/nature02403
   Wu LN, 2021, FRONT MICROBIOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2021.628503
   Yang QL, 2020, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V20, P2395, DOI 10.1007/s11368-020-02606-2
   Yousefzadeh S, 2015, J PLANT NUTR, V38, P1862, DOI 10.1080/01904167.2015.1061548
   Zhang PF, 2020, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/agronomy10101562
   Zhao TJ, 2006, J BIOL CHEM, V281, P10752, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M510535200
   Zia R, 2021, MICROBIOL RES, V242, DOI 10.1016/j.micres.2020.126626
NR 104
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 2
U2 5
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 1735-6814
EI 1735-8043
J9 INT J PLANT PROD
JI Int. J. Plant Prod.
PD MAR
PY 2024
VL 18
IS 1
BP 13
EP 33
DI 10.1007/s42106-023-00272-1
EA JAN 2024
PG 21
WC Agronomy
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA LI9A5
UT WOS:001145244700001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Van Espen, M
   Williams, JH
   Alves, F
   Hung, Y
   de Graaf, DC
   Verbeke, W
AF Van Espen, Marie
   Williams, James H.
   Alves, Fatima
   Hung, Yung
   de Graaf, Dirk C.
   Verbeke, Wim
TI Beekeeping in Europe facing climate change: A mixed methods study on
   perceived impacts and the need to adapt according to stakeholders and
   beekeepers
SO SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Apiculture; Climate adaptation; Apis mellifera; Perception; Pollinators
   decline
ID HONEY-BEE COLONIES; TEMPERATURE; POLLINATORS
AB The beekeeping sector is suffering from the detrimental effects of climate change, both directly and indirectly. Despite numerous studies conducted on this subject, large-scale research incorporating stakeholders' and beekeepers' perspec-tives has remained elusive. This study aims to bridge this gap by assessing the extent to which stakeholders involved in the European beekeeping sector and European beekeepers perceive and experience the impacts of climate change on their operations, and whether they had to adapt their practices accordingly. To this end, a mixed-methods study in-cluding in-depth stakeholder interviews (n = 41) and a pan-European beekeeper survey (n = 844) was completed within the frame of the EU-funded H2020-project B-GOOD. The development of the beekeeper survey was informed by insights from literature and the stakeholder interviews. The results highlighted significant regional disparities in the perceived impacts of climate change, with beekeepers in Southern European regions expressing more negative out-looks, while Northern European beekeepers reported more favourable experiences. Furthermore, survey analysis re-vealed beekeepers who were classified as 'heavily impacted' by climate change. These beekeepers reported lower average honey yields, higher colony winter loss rates and a stronger perceived contribution of honey bees to pollina-tion and biodiversity, underscoring climate change's detrimental impacts on the beekeeping sector. Multinomial logis-tic regression revealed determinants of the likelihood of beekeepers being classified as 'heavily impacted' by climate change. This analysis indicates that Southern European beekeepers experienced a 10-fold likelihood of being classified as heavily impacted by climate change compared to Northern European beekeepers. Other significant factors distinguishing 'winners' and 'losers' were self-reported level of professionalism as a beekeeper (ranging from pure hob-byist to fully professional, Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.31), number of years active in beekeeping (OR = 1.02), availability of floral resources throughout the bee season (OR = 0.78), beehives located in a forested environment (OR = 1.34), and the presence of local policy measures addressing climate change-related challenges (OR = 0.76).
C1 [Van Espen, Marie; Hung, Yung; Verbeke, Wim] Univ Ghent, Dept Agr Econ, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
   [Williams, James H.] Aarhus Univ, Dept Ecosci ECOS, CF Mollers 4-8, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
   [Alves, Fatima] Univ Coimbra, Ctr Funct Ecol Sci People & Planet, TERRA Associate Lab, P-3000456 Coimbra, Portugal.
   [Alves, Fatima] Univ Aberta, Lisbon, Portugal.
   [de Graaf, Dirk C.] Univ Ghent, Dept Biochem & Microbiol, Krijgslaan 281 S2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
C3 Ghent University; Aarhus University; Universidade de Coimbra;
   Universidade Aberta; Ghent University
RP Van Espen, M (corresponding author), Univ Ghent, Dept Agr Econ, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
EM marie.vanespen@ugent.be; jhw@ecos.au.dk; fatimaa@uab.pt;
   yung.hung@ugent.be; wim.verbeke@ugent.be
RI Van Espen, Marie/KFQ-4907-2024; de Graaf, Dirk/HGD-4017-2022; Hung,
   Christine/S-7911-2019; Verbeke, Wim/F-8373-2010; Alves,
   Fatima/R-3494-2016
OI Van Espen, Marie/0000-0001-8919-5059; Williams,
   James/0000-0003-4143-2128; Verbeke, Wim/0000-0002-9967-7104; de Graaf,
   Dirk/0000-0001-8817-0781; Hung, Yung/0000-0002-9510-3525; Alves,
   Fatima/0000-0003-2600-8652
FU European Union [817622]; FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC)
   [UIDB/04004/2020]
FX This study has received funding from the European Union's Horizon
   2020-Research and Innovation Framework Programme under grant agreement
   No. 817622 (project B-GOOD). Project consortium partners and bee-keeping
   associations who assisted in the recruitment of stakeholders and
   beekeepers are gratefully acknowledged. Dana Freshley (Ghent
   University), Joao Bica (University of Coimbra) and Claudina Martins
   (University of Coimbra) are gratefully acknowledged for their help with
   data collection and curation. Part of this work was carried out with the
   participation of the R & D Unit Centre for Functional Ecology-Science
   for People and the Planet (CFE) (Portugal), with reference
   UIDB/04004/2020, financed by FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC) .
CR Abou-Shaara H, 2021, INSECTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/insects12040275
   Bartomeus I, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P20645, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1115559108
   Brodschneider R, 2018, J APICULT RES, V57, P452, DOI 10.1080/00218839.2018.1460911
   Buchori D, 2022, DIVERSITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/d14010052
   Castellanos-Potenciano B, 2017, APPL ECOL ENV RES, V15, P163, DOI 10.15666/aeer/1504_163175
   Cornelissen B, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P3642, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14791
   de Graaf D., 2022, Res. Ideas Outcomes, V8, DOI [10.3897/rio.8.e84129, DOI 10.3897/RIO.8.E84129]
   Decourtye A, 2019, CURR OPIN INSECT SCI, V35, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.cois.2019.07.008
   Donkersley P, 2014, ECOL EVOL, V4, P4195, DOI 10.1002/ece3.1293
   El Agrebi N, 2022, TRANSBOUND EMERG DIS, V69, P579, DOI 10.1111/tbed.14023
   Medina-Cuéllar SE, 2018, J APICULT RES, V57, P507, DOI 10.1080/00218839.2018.1454377
   European Commission, 2019, EU BEEK SECT NAT AP
   FAO, 2022, The state of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. Towards Blue Transformation, DOI [10.4060/ca9229en, 10.4060/cc0461en, DOI 10.4060/CC0461EN, DOI 10.4060/CA9229EN]
   Flores JM, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V653, P1111, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.004
   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2016, CLIMATE CHANGE FOOD
   Gajardo-Rojas M, 2022, PROG PHYS GEOG, V46, P737, DOI 10.1177/03091333221093757
   Gallardo-López F, 2021, REV MEX CIENC PECU, V12, P238, DOI 10.22319/rmcp.v12i1.5213
   Gérard M, 2020, EMERG TOP LIFE SCI, V4, P77, DOI 10.1042/ETLS20190139
   Giliba RA, 2020, ECOL PROCESS, V9, DOI 10.1186/s13717-020-00247-4
   Graystock P, 2016, INT J PARASITOL-PAR, V5, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.10.001
   Hlásny T, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-96717-6
   Hosni EM, 2022, INSECTS, V13, DOI 10.3390/insects13050484
   Johnson R.B., 2014, Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches, V5th
   Kouchner C, 2019, AGR SYST, V176, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102653
   Langowska A, 2017, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V61, P1125, DOI 10.1007/s00484-016-1293-x
   Le Conte Y, 2008, REV SCI TECH OIE, V27, P485, DOI 10.20506/rst.27.2.1819
   MARKWELL TJ, 1993, NEW ZEAL J ECOL, V17, P85
   Memmott J, 2007, ECOL LETT, V10, P710, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01061.x
   Montoya-Pfeiffer PM, 2021, AGR FOREST ENTOMOL, V23, P452, DOI 10.1111/afe.12446
   Naturalis, 2022, FLOW ARCH
   Newman RJS, 2021, DEV PRACT, V31, P446, DOI 10.1080/09614524.2020.1854689
   Novelli S., 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, P675, DOI [10.3390/land10070675, DOI 10.3390/LAND10070675]
   Nürnberger F, 2018, PEERJ, V6, DOI 10.7717/peerj.4801
   Patel V, 2020, ECOL SOC, V25, DOI 10.5751/ES-11639-250224
   Phillips BB, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P3226, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14130
   Potts SG, 2016, NATURE, V540, P220, DOI 10.1038/nature20588
   Powney GD, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-08974-9
   Requier F, 2019, J PEST SCI, V92, P567, DOI 10.1007/s10340-018-1063-0
   Steinhauer N, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V753, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141629
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Switanek M, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V579, P1581, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.178
   Valido A, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-41271-5
   van der Zee R., 2013, J APIC RES
   Vasiliev D, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V775, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145788
   Vercelli M, 2021, INSECTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/insects12030228
   Yildiz C, 2019, INT J GLOBAL WARM, V17, P185, DOI 10.1504/IJGW.2019.097864
NR 46
TC 11
Z9 11
U1 9
U2 28
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0048-9697
EI 1879-1026
J9 SCI TOTAL ENVIRON
JI Sci. Total Environ.
PD AUG 25
PY 2023
VL 888
AR 164255
DI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164255
EA MAY 2023
PG 12
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA L7AF0
UT WOS:001024741200001
PM 37196971
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Zu, KL
   Wang, ZH
   Lenoir, J
   Shen, ZH
   Chen, FS
   Shrestha, N
AF Zu, Kuiling
   Wang, Zhiheng
   Lenoir, Jonathan
   Shen, Zehao
   Chen, Fusheng
   Shrestha, Nawal
TI Different range shifts and determinations of elevational redistributions
   of native and non-native plant species in Jinfo Mountain of subtropical
   China
SO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
LA English
DT Article
DE Elevational shifts; Climate change; Non-native plants; Range size;
   Elevational distribution
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; IMPACT; DISTURBANCE; DIVERSITY; GRADIENTS; RICHNESS;
   FUTURE
AB Species are changing their elevational distributions in response to climate change, leading to biodiversity loss and changes in community structure. Yet whether native and non-native species have consistent elevational shifts remains to be evaluated. Subtropical mountains are rich in biodiversity, sensitive to climate change, and are experiencing high risks of biological invasion. Hence exploring the changes in species elevational distributions induced by climate change in subtropical mountains is an urgent need. Here, we explored the impact of climate change on the elevational distribution of seed plant species in Jinfo Mountain (Mt. Jinfo), a subtropical mountain in China with rich plant diversity. Notably, we compared the elevational redistributions of native and non-native plants in response to climate change. The results showed that the elevational centroids of native plant species moved downhill, while those of non-native plants shifted upward on average. The upper limit of native plants shifted downward, while the upper limit of non-native plants shifted upward on average. The elevational shifts of non-native plants were dominated by changes in the upper range limits, while those of native plants were affected by the lower limits. These opposite elevational shifts of native vs non-native species led to the increase in the elevational range size of the non-native plants, but decrease in the elevational range size of native plants, especially in high altitudes. The differences in the directions and magnitudes of elevational shifts between the native and non-native plants are mainly due to differences in their climate adaptation. Changes in temperature and precipitation influenced the elevational range shifts of native plants but not of non-native ones. This study provides a new perspective for understanding the elevational redistribution of native and non-native plant species in subtropical mountains, and suggests that climate change has stronger influence on native than nonnative species.
C1 [Zu, Kuiling; Wang, Zhiheng; Shen, Zehao] Peking Univ, Inst Ecol, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
   [Zu, Kuiling; Wang, Zhiheng; Shen, Zehao] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Minist Educ, Key Lab Earth Surface Proc, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
   [Zu, Kuiling; Chen, Fusheng] Jiangxi Agr Univ, Coll Forestry, Key Lab Natl Forestry& Grassland Adm Forest Ecosys, Nanchang 330045, Peoples R China.
   [Zu, Kuiling; Chen, Fusheng] Jiangxi Agr Univ, Coll Forestry, Jiangxi Prov Key Lab Silviculture, Nanchang 330045, Peoples R China.
   [Lenoir, Jonathan] Univ Picardie Jules Verne, UMR CNRS Ecol & Dynam Syst Anthropises EDYSAN 7058, 1 Rue Louvels, F-80000 Amiens, France.
   [Shrestha, Nawal] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Ecol, State Key Lab Grassland Agroecosyst, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China.
C3 Peking University; Peking University; Jiangxi Agricultural University;
   Jiangxi Agricultural University; Universite de Picardie Jules Verne
   (UPJV); Lanzhou University
RP Wang, ZH (corresponding author), Peking Univ, Inst Ecol, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.; Wang, ZH (corresponding author), Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Minist Educ, Key Lab Earth Surface Proc, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
EM zhiheng.wang@pku.edu.cn
RI Wang, Zhiheng/G-1750-2010; Chen, Fu-Sheng/AEY-3260-2022; Shen,
   Zehao/GQI-1121-2022; Lenoir, Jonathan/AAE-8441-2019; Shrestha,
   Nawal/ABA-3021-2020
OI Shrestha, Nawal/0000-0002-6866-5100
FU Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences
   [XDB31000000]; National Key Research Development Program of China
   [2022YFF0802300]; National Natural Science Foundation of China
   [32125026, 31988102]
FX This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of
   Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB31000000) , the National Key Research
   Development Program of China (#2022YFF0802300) and the National Natural
   Science Foundation of China (#32125026, #31988102) .
CR Ahmad M, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107653
   Aiello-Lammens ME, 2015, ECOGRAPHY, V38, P541, DOI 10.1111/ecog.01132
   Alexander JM, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P656, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1013136108
   Beaudrot L, 2018, BIOL CONSERV, V228, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.10.016
   Bellard C, 2012, ECOL LETT, V15, P365, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x
   Bezeng BS, 2017, ECOSPHERE, V8, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1694
   Crimmins SM, 2011, SCIENCE, V331, P324, DOI 10.1126/science.1199040
   Dainese M, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P577, DOI [10.1038/nclimate3337, 10.1038/NCLIMATE3337]
   Datta A., 2019, J BIOGEOGR, V00, P1
   Dauby G, 2016, PHYTOKEYS, P1, DOI 10.3897/phytokeys.74.9723
   Diez J, 2020, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V287, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2019.2348
   DUTILLEUL P, 1993, BIOMETRICS, V49, P305, DOI 10.2307/2532625
   Freeman BG, 2018, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V27, P1268, DOI 10.1111/geb.12774
   Gottfried M, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P111, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1329, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1329]
   Grytnes JA, 2014, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V23, P876, DOI 10.1111/geb.12170
   Guo QF, 2018, J BIOGEOGR, V45, P793, DOI 10.1111/jbi.13145
   Hejda M, 2009, J ECOL, V97, P393, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01480.x
   Hutchinson M.F., 1998, Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, V2, P139, DOI [10.1186/s41044-017-0021-9, DOI 10.1186/S41044-017-0021-9]
   Koide D, 2017, J VEG SCI, V28, P939, DOI 10.1111/jvs.12549
   Körner C, 2000, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V15, P513, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02004-8
   Lembrechts JJ, 2017, ECOGRAPHY, V40, P353, DOI 10.1111/ecog.02200
   Lenoir J, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P1768, DOI 10.1126/science.1156831
   Lenoir J, 2015, ECOGRAPHY, V38, P15, DOI 10.1111/ecog.00967
   Lenoir J, 2020, NAT ECOL EVOL, V4, P1044, DOI 10.1038/s41559-020-1198-2
   Mamantov MA, 2021, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V30, P784, DOI 10.1111/geb.13246
   Moritz C, 2008, SCIENCE, V322, P261, DOI 10.1126/science.1163428
   Myers N, 2000, NATURE, V403, P853, DOI 10.1038/35002501
   Nogués-Bravo D, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P420, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.007
   Page LM, 2015, BIOSCIENCE, V65, P841, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biv104
   Pauchard A, 2016, BIOL INVASIONS, V18, P345, DOI 10.1007/s10530-015-1025-x
   Pauchard A, 2009, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V7, P479, DOI 10.1890/080072
   Pauli H, 2012, SCIENCE, V336, P353, DOI 10.1126/science.1219033
   Pepin N, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P424, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2563, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2563]
   Perrigo A, 2020, J BIOGEOGR, V47, P315, DOI 10.1111/jbi.13731
   Petitpierre B, 2016, ECOL APPL, V26, P530, DOI 10.1890/14-1871
   Polechová J, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P6401, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1421515112
   Rahbek C, 2019, SCIENCE, V365, P1114, DOI 10.1126/science.aax0151
   Rangel TF, 2018, SCIENCE, V361, DOI 10.1126/science.aar5452
   Rebetez M, 2008, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V91, P27, DOI 10.1007/s00704-007-0296-2
   Rew L.J., 2020, ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES
   Rumpf SB, 2019, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V28, P533, DOI 10.1111/geb.12865
   Sandoya V, 2017, ECOL EVOL, V7, P7909, DOI 10.1002/ece3.3270
   Steinbauer MJ, 2018, NATURE, V556, P231, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0005-6
   Stubbs RL, 2018, ECOL EVOL, V8, P7164, DOI 10.1002/ece3.4242
   Sun Juan Sun Juan, 2009, Acta Prataculturae Sinica, V18, P34
   Team T.R.C., 2017, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
   Vitasse Y, 2021, BIOL REV, V96, P1816, DOI 10.1111/brv.12727
   Wang SP, 2010, CHINESE SCI BULL, V55, P1968, DOI 10.1007/s11434-010-3236-y
   Wang YP, 2021, J PLANT ECOL, V14, P749, DOI 10.1093/jpe/rtab029
   Wildlife Conservation Society - WCS, 2005, NASA SEDAC, DOI 10.7927/H46W980H
   Yang WJ, 2014, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V23, P1284, DOI 10.1111/geb.12225
   [易思荣 Yi Sirong], 2004, [西北植物学报, Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalla Sinica], V24, P83
   Zu KL, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V783, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146896
NR 53
TC 3
Z9 4
U1 10
U2 38
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1470-160X
EI 1872-7034
J9 ECOL INDIC
JI Ecol. Indic.
PD DEC
PY 2022
VL 145
AR 109678
DI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109678
PG 9
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA G8MV8
UT WOS:000991642700003
OA Green Submitted, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Li, CB
   Lu, LL
   Fu, ZT
   Sun, RH
   Pan, LY
   Han, LY
   Guo, HD
   Li, QT
AF Li, Chunbo
   Lu, Linlin
   Fu, Zongtang
   Sun, Ranhao
   Pan, Luyang
   Han, Liying
   Guo, Huadong
   Li, Qingting
TI Diverse cooling effects of green space on urban heat island in tropical
   megacities
SO FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE urban heat island; green space; threshold value of efficiency; cooling
   intensity; megacity; sustainable development goals
ID LAND-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; CLIMATE ADAPTATION; SIZE; CITY; MITIGATION;
   VEGETATION; INFRASTRUCTURE; REFLECTANCE; EFFICIENCY; DYNAMICS
AB Cities in tropical regions are experiencing high heat risks by overlaying the urban heat island (UHI) effect. Urban green space (UGS) can provide local cooling effect and reduce UHI. However, there still lack a comprehensive exploration of the characteristics of UHI and cooling effect of UGS due to high cloud coverage and limited number of available remote sensing observations. In this study, the enhanced spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance data fusion method was employed to develop an enhanced land surface temperature data in winter seasons in three tropical megacities, Dhaka, Kolkata, and Bangkok. The spatiotemporal variations of surface urban heat island (SUHI) were explored from 2000 to 2020 with a 5-years interval. The optimal size of UGS associated with its cooling effects was assessed by using the threshold value of efficiency (TVoE). The relationship between the intensity and range of urban cooling island (UCI) and four landscape metrics of green space patches, total area (P_Area), shape index (P_SI), normalized difference vegetation index (P_NDVI), and land surface temperature (P_LST), were analyzed. The results show that the average SUHI intensity increased by 0.98 degrees C, 1.42 degrees C, and 0.73 degrees C in Dhaka, Kolkata, and Bangkok, respectively, from 2000 to 2020. The maximum intensity of UCI ranges from 4.83 degrees C in Bangkok to 8.07 degrees C in Kolkata, and the maximum range of UCI varies from 300 m in Bangkok to 420 m in Kolkata. The optimal size of green space is 0.37 ha, 0.77 ha, and 0.42 ha in Dhaka, Kolkata, and Bangkok, respectively. The P_NDVI and P_Area had significant positive effects on UCI intensity and range, while the background temperature had significant negative effects. With higher background temperature, the optimal patch size of UGS is larger. This study provides useful information for developing effective heat mitigation and adaptation strategies to enhance climate resilience in tropical cities.
C1 [Li, Chunbo; Lu, Linlin; Pan, Luyang; Han, Liying; Guo, Huadong] Chinese Acad Sci, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, Key Lab Digital Earth Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Chunbo; Lu, Linlin; Pan, Luyang; Han, Liying; Guo, Huadong] Int Res Ctr Big Data Sustainable Dev Goals, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Chunbo; Fu, Zongtang] China Univ Geosci, Sch Land Sci & Technol, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Sun, Ranhao] Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Qingting] Chinese Acad Sci, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, Airborne Remote Sensing Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China.
C3 Chinese Academy of Sciences; Aerospace Information Research Institute,
   CAS; Chinese Academy of Sciences; International Research Center of Big
   Data for Sustainable Development Goals; China University of Geosciences;
   Chinese Academy of Sciences; Research Center for Eco-Environmental
   Sciences (RCEES); Chinese Academy of Sciences; Aerospace Information
   Research Institute, CAS
RP Lu, LL (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, Key Lab Digital Earth Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.; Lu, LL (corresponding author), Int Res Ctr Big Data Sustainable Dev Goals, Beijing, Peoples R China.
EM lull@radi.ac.cn
RI han, liying/HDM-8294-2022; sun, ranhao/AAM-6837-2021; Lu,
   Linlin/P-9200-2018
OI Lu, Linlin/0000-0003-1647-1950
FU Director Fund of the International Research Center of Big Data for
   Sustainable Development Goals; National Natural Science Foundation of
   China [CBAS2022DF016];  [42071321]
FX This research was funded by the Director Fund of the International
   Research Center of Big Data for Sustainable Development Goals (grant
   number CBAS2022DF016); and the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (grant number 42071321).
CR Abudu D., 2017, Int J Sci Eng Res, V8, P289, DOI 10.14299/ijser.2017.04.009
   Akbari H, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V133, P834, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.09.067
   Algretawee H, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101255
   Aram F, 2019, HELIYON, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01339
   Arnfield AJ, 2003, INT J CLIMATOL, V23, P1, DOI 10.1002/joc.859
   Baqa MF, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14092164
   Bartesaghi-Koc C, 2022, ENERG BUILDINGS, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111564
   Bechtel B, 2019, URBAN CLIM, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.01.005
   Beck HE, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2018.214
   Coleman Jude, 2022, Nature, DOI 10.1038/d41586-022-01444-1
   Das P, 2020, AEROSOL SCI ENG, V4, P200, DOI 10.1007/s41810-020-00067-1
   Derkzen ML, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V157, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.027
   Doick KJ, 2014, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V493, P662, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.048
   [段四波 Duan Sibo], 2021, [遥感学报, National Remote Sensing Bulletin], V25, P1591
   Estoque RC, 2017, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V133, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.09.008
   Estoque RC, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V577, P349, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.195
   Fan HY, 2019, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V265, P338, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.11.027
   Feyisa GL, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V123, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.008
   Gao F, 2006, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V44, P2207, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2006.872081
   Geng XL, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V823, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153806
   Gillner S, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V143, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.005
   Girardet H, 2020, ONE EARTH, V2, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.005
   Giridharan R, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V40, P677, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.024
   Halder B, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103186
   Hami A, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101634
   Hassan T, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13163177
   Hathway EA, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V58, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.013
   Irger M., 2014, THESIS UNSW SYDNEY
   Khamchiangta D, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109285
   Koc CB, 2018, SOL ENERGY, V166, P486, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2018.03.008
   Lin WQ, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V134, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.012
   Liu MX, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12213673
   Liu X, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V257, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120529
   Lu LL, 2022, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V224, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106201
   Lu LL, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12172713
   Lu LL, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V684, P567, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.344
   Lu LL, 2015, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V7, P7597, DOI 10.3390/rs70607597
   Monteiro MV, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V16, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.008
   Morakinyo TE, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V719, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137461
   Morakinyo TE, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V115, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.01.005
   MURAKAWA S, 1991, ENERG BUILDINGS, V16, P993, DOI 10.1016/0378-7788(91)90094-J
   Nath SK, 2015, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V15, P1103, DOI 10.5194/nhess-15-1103-2015
   OKE TR, 1973, ATMOS ENVIRON, V7, P769, DOI 10.1016/0004-6981(73)90140-6
   Oliveira S, 2011, BUILD ENVIRON, V46, P2186, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.04.034
   Shah A, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V209, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104043
   Shashua-Bar L, 2000, ENERG BUILDINGS, V31, P221, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(99)00018-3
   Si ML, 2022, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V183, P321, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.11.017
   Sobrino JA, 2008, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V46, P316, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2007.904834
   Stone B, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0100852
   Sun RH, 2017, ECOSYST SERV, V23, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.011
   Tan XY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102711
   Uddin ASMS, 2022, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V147, P891, DOI 10.1007/s00704-021-03872-x
   UN, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203
   United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs & Population Division, 2019, WORLD URB PROSP 2018
   Venhari AA, 2019, J ARID ENVIRON, V166, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2019.04.009
   Wang YJ, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-11283-w
   Weng QH, 2014, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V145, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.003
   Weng QH, 2009, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V64, P335, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.03.007
   Yang GY, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101932
   Yin S, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V209, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108676
   Yu ZW, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126630
   Yu ZW, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-25296-w
   Yu ZW, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V29, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.008
   Yu ZW, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V82, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.002
   Yuan HH, 2018, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V144, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.08.013
   Zhao L, 2014, NATURE, V511, P216, DOI 10.1038/nature13462
   Zhou WQ, 2017, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V195, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.043
   Zhou W, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V225, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104449
   Zhu XL, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P2610, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2010.05.032
NR 69
TC 10
Z9 11
U1 17
U2 77
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-665X
J9 FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ
JI Front. Environ. Sci.
PD NOV 24
PY 2022
VL 10
AR 1073914
DI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1073914
PG 15
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 6V2TL
UT WOS:000894906900001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Meigs, GW
   Case, MJ
   Churchill, DJ
   Hersey, CM
   Jeronimo, SMA
   Smith, LAC
AF Meigs, Garrett W.
   Case, Michael J.
   Churchill, Derek J.
   Hersey, Charles M.
   Jeronimo, Sean M. A.
   Smith, L. Annie C.
TI Drought, wildfire and forest transformation: characterizing trailing
   edge forests in the eastern Cascade Range, Washington, USA
SO FORESTRY
LA English
DT Article
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; SPATIAL-PATTERNS; FIRE SEVERITY; IMPACTS; LANDSCAPE;
   MODELS; ERA
AB Climate change and the compounding effects of drought and wildfire are catalyzing rapid ecosystem changes throughout the world. Relatively dry, trailing edge (TE) forests are especially vulnerable to ecological transformation when tree regeneration is moisture-limited following high-severity fire. Here, we illustrate the potential landscape-scale impacts of changing disturbance regimes by focusing on TE forests in the eastern Cascades of Washington, USA. Our specific objectives were to: (1) map TE forests based on climatic water deficit and forest cover; (2) characterize the composition, structure, and ownership of TE and non-TE forests; (3) quantify recent fire activity in TE and non-TE forests; (4) identify locations of potential forest loss where recent fires have burned severely in TE forests. Across the study area, TE forests encompassed 387 000 ha, representing a substantial portion (21 per cent) of the total forested landscape. TE forests generally were characterized by dry, mixed-conifer forest types with more open structure and less biomass than non-TE forests. The structural and compositional conditions within TE forests make them ideal locations for management strategies designed to enhance landscape resilience and sustain fire-resistant trees. TE forestland ownership is diverse (35 per cent federal, 19 per cent Tribal, 16 per cent Washington State, 14 per cent private non-industrial and 13 per cent private industrial), indicating that successful land management will require collaboration among numerous partners. Recent wildfires (1984-2020) cumulatively covered 84 300 ha (22 per cent) of TE forests and 363 500 ha (25 per cent) of non-TE forests. TE forests experienced less high-severity fire than non-TE forests (39 per cent vs. 46 per cent, respectively). Recent high-severity fire effects in TE forests occurred primarily in the northern portion of the study region, reflecting the distribution of individual large fires. By quantifying the variability of TE forests and their recent fire activity, this study supports adaptive management strategies for landscape restoration, post-disturbance reforestation and climate adaptation.
C1 [Meigs, Garrett W.; Churchill, Derek J.; Hersey, Charles M.; Smith, L. Annie C.] Washington State Dept Nat Resources, 1111 Washington St SE, Olympia, WA 98504 USA.
   [Meigs, Garrett W.] Oregon State Univ, Coll Forestry, 3100 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA.
   [Case, Michael J.] Nature Conservancy, 74 Wall St, Seattle, WA 98121 USA.
   [Case, Michael J.] Evergreen State Coll, 2700 Evergreen Pkwy NW, Olympia, WA 98505 USA.
   [Jeronimo, Sean M. A.] Resilient Forestry, 3703 S Edmunds St, Seattle, WA 98116 USA.
   [Jeronimo, Sean M. A.] Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, 3715 W Stevens Way NE, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.
C3 Oregon State University; Nature Conservancy; University of Washington;
   University of Washington Seattle
RP Meigs, GW (corresponding author), Washington State Dept Nat Resources, 1111 Washington St SE, Olympia, WA 98504 USA.; Meigs, GW (corresponding author), Oregon State Univ, Coll Forestry, 3100 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA.
EM gmeigs@gmail.com
RI Meigs, Garrett/AAH-4948-2021
OI Case, Michael/0000-0003-4111-2298
CR Agee JK, 2003, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V18, P725, DOI 10.1023/B:LAND.0000014474.49803.f9
   Ager AA, 2019, APPL GEOGR, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102059
   Anderegg WRL, 2020, SCIENCE, V368, P1327, DOI 10.1126/science.aaz7005
   [Anonymous], Infrastructure investment and jobs act impacts cryptocurrency brokers
   [Anonymous], 2018, ARCGIS DESKT REL 10
   Buotte PC, 2020, ECOL APPL, V30, DOI 10.1002/eap.2039
   Cansler A, 2022, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V504, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119764
   Cansler CA, 2014, ECOL APPL, V24, P1037, DOI 10.1890/13-1077.1
   Case MJ, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P2005, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13570
   Case MJ, 2021, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V482, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118886
   Case MJ, 2020, FORESTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/f11060618
   Churchill DJ, 2022, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V504, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119796
   Churchill DJ, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V291, P442, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.007
   Coop JD, 2020, BIOSCIENCE, V70, P659, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biaa061
   Curtis R. O., 2000, WEST J APPL FOR, V15, P137, DOI DOI 10.1093/WJAF/15.3.137
   Davies IP, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0205825
   Davis KT, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abb9df
   Davis KT, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P6193, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1815107116
   Dobrowski SZ, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P241, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12026
   Donato DC, 2016, ECOSPHERE, V7, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1410
   Dunn CJ, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6498
   Everett RL, 2000, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V129, P207, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00168-1
   Franklin J.F., 1973, PNW8 US FOR SERV GEN, P1
   Guisan A, 2000, ECOL MODEL, V135, P147, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9
   Hagmann RK, 2021, ECOL APPL, V31, DOI 10.1002/eap.2431
   Haugo RD, 2019, ECOSPHERE, V10, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2702
   Hessburg PF, 2007, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V22, P5, DOI 10.1007/s10980-007-9098-2
   Hessburg PF, 2019, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V7, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2019.00239
   Hessburg PF, 2000, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V136, P53, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00263-7
   Kemp KB, 2019, ECOSPHERE, V10, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2568
   Koontz MJ, 2020, ECOL LETT, V23, P483, DOI 10.1111/ele.13447
   Lake FK, 2017, J FOREST, V115, P343, DOI 10.5849/jof.2016-043R2
   Larson AJ, 2022, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V504, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119680
   Lynch AJ, 2021, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V19, P461, DOI 10.1002/fee.2377
   Lynn K, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V120, P545, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0736-1
   Mckenney DW, 2007, BIOSCIENCE, V57, P939, DOI 10.1641/B571106
   McNellis BE, 2021, ECOSPHERE, V12, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.3419
   Meigs GW, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9050243
   Meigs GW, 2015, ECOSPHERE, V6, DOI 10.1890/ES15-00037.1
   Meyer M.D., 2021, PSWGTR270 USDA FOR S, V204, P270
   Millar CI, 2015, SCIENCE, V349, P823, DOI 10.1126/science.aaa9933
   Miller JD, 2007, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V109, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2006.12.006
   North MP, 2022, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V507, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.120004
   O'Neil TA, 2001, WILDLIFE-HABITAT RELATIONSHIPS IN OREGON AND WASHINGTON, P115
   Ohmann JL, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V272, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.09.021
   Parks SA, 2019, ECOSPHERE, V10, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2651
   Parks SA, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10060879
   Pearson RG, 2003, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V12, P361, DOI 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00042.x
   Povak NA, 2020, ECOSPHERE, V11, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.3199
   Prichard SJ, 2020, ECOL APPL, V30, DOI 10.1002/eap.2104
   PRIESTLEY CHB, 1972, MON WEATHER REV, V100, P81, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0081:OTAOSH>2.3.CO;2
   Raats M. M., 1992, Food Quality and Preference, V3, P89, DOI 10.1016/0950-3293(91)90028-D
   Ramsfield TD, 2016, FORESTRY, V89, P245, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpw018
   Reilly MJ, 2017, ECOSPHERE, V8, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1695
   Riahi K, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P33, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y
   Saberi S.J., 2022, FIRE ECOL
   Schuurman GW, 2022, BIOSCIENCE, V72, P16, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biab067
   Seaber P.R., 1987, HYDROLOGIC UNIT MAPS, DOI 10.3133/wsp2294
   Shafer SL, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0138759
   Stephens SL, 2018, BIOSCIENCE, V68, P77, DOI 10.1093/biosci/bix146
   Stephenson NL, 1998, J BIOGEOGR, V25, P855, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.00233.x
   Stevens JT, 2021, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V502, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119678
   Stevens-Rumann CS, 2019, FIRE ECOL, V15, DOI 10.1186/s42408-019-0032-1
   Stocker TF, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1, DOI 10.1017/cbo9781107415324
   Urza AK, 2020, ECOL APPL, V30, DOI 10.1002/eap.2158
   UW Climate Impacts Group (UW Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Front and Centered and Urban@UW), 2018, UNF SHAR EXPL DISPR
   van Mantgem PJ, 2009, SCIENCE, V323, P521, DOI 10.1126/science.1165000
   WADNR (Washington State Department of Natural Resources), 2022, WILDF SEAS 2021 WORK
   WADNR (Washington State Department of Natural Resources), 2020, 7606200 RCW WADNR, V268
   Wang TL, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0156720
   Williams AP, 2022, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V12, P232, DOI 10.1038/s41558-022-01290-z
   Young DJN, 2017, ECOL LETT, V20, P78, DOI 10.1111/ele.12711
NR 72
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 1
U2 12
PU OXFORD UNIV PRESS
PI OXFORD
PA GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND
SN 0015-752X
EI 1464-3626
J9 FORESTRY
JI Forestry
PD MAY 5
PY 2023
VL 96
IS 3
BP 340
EP 354
DI 10.1093/forestry/cpac046
EA NOV 2022
PG 15
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA F3KG2
UT WOS:000880141700001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Zhou, W
   Yu, WL
   Wu, T
AF Zhou, Wen
   Yu, Wenluo
   Wu, Tao
TI An alternative method of developing landscape strategies for urban
   cooling: A threshold-based perspective
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban cool island; The absolute threshold of cooling; Urban planning;
   Climate adaptation
ID LAND-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; HEAT ISLANDS; SPATIAL-PATTERN; CLIMATE-CHANGE;
   GREEN SPACE; VEGETATION; IMPACT; WAVES; MITIGATION; MORTALITY
AB Increasing the amount of blue-green spaces has been recognized as an effective strategy to mitigate the urban heat island (UHI) effect. Specific quantitative and actionable landscape mitigation strategies for different land use and land-cover (LULC) types to cool down cities, have been rarely addressed. In this paper, the absolute threshold of cooling (ToC(abs)) -the specific threshold of a certain influencing factor to ensure the effective cooling of a particular patch type, was proposed and defined for the first time to facilitate the research. The effects of size, shape and neighboring greenspace percentage (NGP) of different types of LULC patches on land surface temperature (LST) were examined and their corresponding ToC(abs) values were determined if existed, in the metropolitan areas of Beijing, Shanghai and Tianjin using satellite images. Results demonstrate that larger sized and complex-shaped water bodies and forested areas produce greater cooling effect. The size is irrelevant to the cooling intensity of grass-dominated patches. ToC(abs) of patch size exist and were identified for water bodies (Beijing, 5 ha; Shanghai, 10 ha; and Tianjin, 5 ha) and forested areas (Beijing, 20 ha; Shanghai, 50 ha; and Tianjin, 20 ha). Besides, NGP is negatively correlated with patch LST for all LULC types, indicating that increasing the amount of neighboring vegetation cover can effectively lower the nearby patch LST. ToC(abs) of NGP exist and were identified for water bodies (Beijing, 30.3%; Shanghai, 61.6%; and Tianjin, 20%) and grass dominated areas (Beijing, 89.1%; Shanghai, 76.9%; and Tianjin, 81.5%). Among the three influencing factors, the size accounts for greatest variability in patch LST for forested areas and impervious surfaces, and neighboring greenspace proportion accounts for the most variability in LST for water bodies and grass-dominated areas. The methodology and results of this study could help to orientate specific and actionable landscape strategies of urban cooling.
C1 [Zhou, Wen; Yu, Wenluo; Wu, Tao] Yangzhou Univ, Coll Hort & Plant Protect, Yangzhou 225000, Peoples R China.
C3 Yangzhou University
RP Wu, T (corresponding author), Yangzhou Univ, Coll Hort & Plant Protect, Yangzhou 225000, Peoples R China.
EM 007688@yzu.edu.cn
RI Zhou, Wen/LTD-0998-2024
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [32101577]; Scientific
   Research Foundation for Advanced Talents, Yangzhou Uni-versity
   [137012167]
FX Acknowledgements This work is supported by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (Grant Number: 32101577; Representative: Wen Zhou)
   and Scientific Research Foundation for Advanced Talents, Yangzhou
   Uni-versity (Grant Number: 137012167; Representative: Wen Zhou) .
   Special thanks to two anonymous reviewers and the editor for their
   valuable comments to improve our manuscript.
CR Akbari H, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V133, P834, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.09.067
   Anderson GB, 2011, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V119, P210, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1002313
   Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics, 2020, BEIJ STAT YB 2020
   Bonan GB, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P1444, DOI 10.1126/science.1155121
   Bowler DE, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V97, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
   Cao C, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms12509
   Cao X, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V96, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.03.008
   Chang CR, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V80, P386, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.09.005
   Chen AL, 2014, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V13, P646, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.07.006
   Du HY, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V67, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.040
   Dugord PA, 2014, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V48, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.07.005
   Ellison D, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V43, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.01.002
   Feng W, 2022, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V24, P4278, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01615-6
   Feyisa GL, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V123, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.008
   Foody GM, 2002, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V80, P185, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00295-4
   FORMAN RTT, 1995, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V10, P133, DOI 10.1007/BF00133027
   Gomez-Martinez F, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10020155
   GRIMMOND CSB, 1991, WATER RESOUR RES, V27, P1739, DOI 10.1029/91WR00557
   Hamada S, 2010, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V9, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.10.002
   He BJ, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V44, P416, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.049
   Hoag H, 2015, NATURE, V524, P402, DOI 10.1038/524402a
   Hsiang SM, 2011, NATURE, V476, P438, DOI 10.1038/nature10311
   Huang CR, 2011, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V119, P1681, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1103456
   Imhoff ML, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P504, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2009.10.008
   Jenerette GD, 2007, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V22, P353, DOI 10.1007/s10980-006-9032-z
   Kong FH, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V128, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.018
   Kottmeier C, 2007, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V133, P128, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2007)133:2(128)
   Kusaka H, 2012, J METEOROL SOC JPN, V90B, P47, DOI 10.2151/jmsj.2012-B04
   Lehmann I, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V42, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.036
   Li D, 2013, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V52, P2051, DOI 10.1175/JAMC-D-13-02.1
   Li JX, 2011, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V115, P3249, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.07.008
   Li XM, 2012, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V27, P887, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9731-6
   Lin WQ, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V134, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.012
   Liu H, 2008, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V144, P199, DOI 10.1007/s10661-007-9979-5
   Manoli G, 2019, NATURE, V573, P55, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1512-9
   Masoudi M, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V184, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.023
   McGarigal K., 2012, Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical and Continuous Maps
   McGeehin MA, 2001, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V109, P185, DOI 10.2307/3435008
   Montazeri H, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.001
   Monteiro MV, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V16, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.008
   Ng E, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V47, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.07.014
   OKE TR, 1982, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V108, P1, DOI 10.1002/qj.49710845502
   Opdam P, 2009, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V24, P715, DOI 10.1007/s10980-009-9377-1
   Park J, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V21, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.12.005
   Patz JA, 2005, NATURE, V438, P310, DOI 10.1038/nature04188
   Peng J, 2016, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V173, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2015.11.027
   Qin Z, 2001, INT J REMOTE SENS, V22, P3719, DOI 10.1080/01431160010006971
   Rizwan AM, 2008, J ENVIRON SCI, V20, P120, DOI 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60019-4
   Santamouris M, 2018, J CIV ENG MANAG, V24, P638, DOI 10.3846/jcem.2018.6604
   Shanghai Municipal Bureau Statistics, 2020, SHANGH STAT YB 2020
   Shiflett SA, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V579, P495, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.069
   Steeneveld GJ, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V121, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.001
   Stewart ID, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P1879, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00019.1
   Sun RH, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V105, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.018
   Theeuwes NE, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V118, P8881, DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50704
   Tianjin Municipal Bureau Statistics, 2020, TIANJ STAT YB 2020
   United Nations Popul. Fund, 2007, STATE WORLD POPULATI
   Upmanis H, 1998, INT J CLIMATOL, V18, P681, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(199805)18:6<681::AID-JOC289>3.0.CO;2-L
   Voogt JA, 2003, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V86, P370, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00079-8
   Wang CH, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V227, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.03.024
   Ward K, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V569, P527, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.119
   Weng Q, 2001, INT J REMOTE SENS, V22, P1999, DOI 10.1080/713860788
   Weng QH, 2011, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V49, P4080, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2011.2128874
   Wu J., 2008, LANDSCAPE J, V27, P41, DOI [DOI 10.3368/LJ.27.1.41, 10.3368/lj.27.1.41]
   Xiao XD, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V40, P428, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.04.002
   [徐丽华 XU LiHua], 2008, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V28, P1702
   Yan H, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V622, P882, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.327
   Yu ZW, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126630
   Yu ZW, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V446, P214, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.05.046
   Yu ZW, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V674, P242, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.088
   Zhang X, 2009, INT J REMOTE SENS, V30, P2105, DOI 10.1080/01431160802549252
   Zhang YZ, 2017, INFRARED PHYS TECHN, V86, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.infrared.2017.08.008
   Zhao L, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa9f73
   Zhao ZQ, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V155, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.046
   Zhou WQ, 2017, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V195, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.043
   Zhou WQ, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V102, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.009
   Zhou W, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105778
   Zhou W, 2019, FORESTS, V10, DOI 10.3390/f10030282
NR 78
TC 29
Z9 30
U1 21
U2 192
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD SEP
PY 2022
VL 225
AR 104449
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104449
EA MAY 2022
PG 11
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional
   & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public
   Administration; Urban Studies
GA 1L5GT
UT WOS:000799317200002
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Mairura, FS
   Musafiri, CM
   Kiboi, MN
   Macharia, JM
   Ng'etich, OK
   Shisanya, CA
   Okeyo, JM
   Mugendi, DN
   Okwuosa, EA
   Ngetich, FK
AF Mairura, Franklin S.
   Musafiri, Collins M.
   Kiboi, Milka N.
   Macharia, Joseph M.
   Ng'etich, Onesmus K.
   Shisanya, Chris A.
   Okeyo, Jeremiah M.
   Mugendi, Daniel N.
   Okwuosa, Elizabeth A.
   Ngetich, Felix K.
TI Determinants of farmers' perceptions of climate variability, mitigation,
   and adaptation strategies in the central highlands of Kenya
SO WEATHER AND CLIMATE EXTREMES
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate-smart agriculture; Adaptation potential; Greenhouse gas
   emissions; Climate variability
ID POTENTIAL INVESTMENT RETURNS; SMALLHOLDER FARMERS; ADAPTING AGRICULTURE;
   METEOROLOGICAL DATA; ADOPTION; SOIL; TECHNOLOGIES; GENDER; DISTRICT;
   DECISION
AB Climate variability in recent decades has intensified in the SSA region, which makes it imperative to explore adequate adaptation and mitigation strategies to offset its current and future adverse impacts. Farmers' perception of climate variability can significantly influence their coping, mitigation, and adaptation potential. This study assessed farmers' perceptions of indicators and consequences of climate variability and explored factors influencing their perception of climate variability and adoption of climate coping strategies. A crosssectional survey design was used to sample 300 farmers in the Central Highlands of Kenya. Binary logistic regression models were used to determine factors that influenced the perception of climate variability, adaptation, and mitigation strategies based on three predictor sets, including socioeconomic, institutional, and environmental dimensions. Three climate adaptation and mitigation strategy groups adopted by farmers, including crop adjustment, nutrient management, and soil and water management practices, were subjected to binary logistic regression models. The core determinants of farmers' perception of climate variability included tropical livestock unit (TLU, p = 0.008), access to agricultural training (p = 0.022), change in agricultural production (p = 0.005), change in forest cover (p = 0.014), soil fertility status (p = 0.039), and perceptions of soil erosion (p = 0.001). Most farmers reported changes in all climatic indicators during the decade preceding the survey, including increasing temperature (80%), reduced precipitation (78%), and declining season lengths (76%). There were significant relationships between climate variability perceptions and coping strategies, with the soil and water management set showing stronger links with climate perceptions compared to crop adjustment and nutrient management strategies. Critical mitigation and adaptation strategies to cope with climate variability implemented by farmers included the use of fertilizer and manure in combination (71%), terracing (66%), and crop rotation (60%). Farmers' perceptions significantly determined the adoption of climate-smart agriculture technologies, and environmental determinants strongly influenced climate variability coping strategies. Therefore, while formulating climate sustainability-related policies, farmers' perceptions should be considered.
C1 [Mairura, Franklin S.; Kiboi, Milka N.; Okeyo, Jeremiah M.] Univ Embu, Dept Land & Water Management, POB 6-60100, Embu, Kenya.
   [Musafiri, Collins M.; Ng'etich, Onesmus K.; Mugendi, Daniel N.] Univ Embu, Dept Agr Resource Management, POB 6-60100, Embu, Kenya.
   [Macharia, Joseph M.; Shisanya, Chris A.] Kenyatta Univ, Dept Geog, POB 43844-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
   [Okwuosa, Elizabeth A.] Kenya Agr & Livestock Res Org KALRO Muguga, POB 30148-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
   [Ngetich, Felix K.] Jaram Oginga Odinga Univ Sci & Technol JOOUST, Dept Plant Anim & Food Sci PAFS, POB 210-40601, Bondo, Kenya.
C3 Kenyatta University
RP Mairura, FS (corresponding author), Univ Embu, Dept Land & Water Management, POB 6-60100, Embu, Kenya.
EM fsmairura@gmail.com
RI Allan, Chrsitopher/ABE-7816-2020; Musafiri, Collins/GWQ-3131-2022;
   Ngetich, Felix/L-1837-2013; Kiboi, Milka/AAD-9601-2019
OI Okeyo, Jeremiah Mosioma/0000-0003-2198-1699; Mugendi, Daniel
   Njiru/0000-0002-4998-662X; Musafiri, Collins/0000-0002-7344-4644;
   Ngetich, Felix/0000-0002-7058-7973; Kiboi, Milka/0000-0003-3206-858X
FU National Research Fund (NRF)-Kenya
FX The authors acknowledge the National Research Fund (NRF)-Kenya for
   providing financial support through the University of Embu
   Multidisciplinary project entitled; "Towards Quantifying Green House Gas
   emissions and deriving emission factors from organic and inorganic
   fertilized farming systems of Kenya." The authors also acknowledge Maara
   and Chuka Sub-County farmers for responding to the interview schedule.
CR Abdul-Hanan A., 2017, International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, V3, P31, DOI 10.1504/IJSAMI.2017.10003795
   Abrams L., 2018, Unlocking the potential of enhanced rain-fed agriculture
   Adzawla W, 2020, SCI AFR, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00397
   Alam GMM, 2017, CLIM RISK MANAG, V17, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2017.06.006
   Arunrat N, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V143, P672, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.058
   Asare-Nuamah P, 2019, HELIYON, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03065
   Asayehegn K, 2017, CAH AGRIC, V26, DOI 10.1051/cagri/2017007
   Asrat P., 2017, Agriculture Food Security, V6, P61, DOI [10.1186/s40066-017-0148-y, DOI 10.1186/S40066-017-0148-Y]
   Asrat P, 2018, ECOL PROCESS, V7, DOI 10.1186/s13717-018-0118-8
   Ayal DY, 2017, J ARID ENVIRON, V140, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.01.007
   Ayanlade A, 2017, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V15, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2016.12.001
   Belachew A, 2020, INT SOIL WATER CONSE, V8, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.iswcr.2020.01.005
   Belay Abrham., 2017, Agriculture Food Security, V6, P24, DOI [10.1186/s40066-017-0100-1, DOI 10.1186/S40066-017-0100-1]
   Beyene AD, 2019, FOR TREES LIVELIHOOD, V28, P194, DOI 10.1080/14728028.2019.1620137
   Branca G, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121900
   Bryan E, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V114, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.036
   Calzadilla A, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V120, P357, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0822-4
   Cochran WilliamGemmell., 1999, Sampling techniques, V3d
   Dhakal A, 2020, FORESTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/f11050565
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Foguesatto CR, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V232, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.275
   Fosu-Mensah B. Y., 2012, Environment Development and Sustainability, V14, P495, DOI 10.1007/s10668-012-9339-7
   Gebre GG, 2019, WOMEN STUD INT FORUM, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.wsif.2019.102264
   Gioto V., 2016, J METEOROL RELAT SCI, V9, DOI 120987/jmrs.0201
   Hallegatte S., 2016, SHOCK WAVES MANAGING, DOI [DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-0673-5, 10.1596/978-1-4648-0673-5_fm]
   Howden SM, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P19691, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701890104
   Jaetzold R., 2007, Farm Management Handbook of Kenya: Natural Conditions and Farm Information (Vol. 11/C), V11
   Jaetzold R., 2010, Farm Management Handbook of Kenya. Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit, V2
   Jahnke H. E., 1982, Livestock production systems and livestock development in tropical Africa.
   Kenya national Bureau of Statistics (KNBS), 2019, Kenya Population and Housing Census Volume I: Population by County and Sub-County, P1
   Kiboi MN, 2020, GEODERMA REG, V21, DOI 10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00287
   Kiboi MN, 2019, AGR WATER MANAGE, V217, P316, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.014
   Kibue GW, 2016, ENVIRON MANAGE, V57, P976, DOI 10.1007/s00267-016-0661-y
   Kpadonou RAB, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V61, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.050
   Lipper L, 2018, NAT RES MAN POL
   Macharia J., 2014, Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology B, V4, P701
   Macharia JM, 2020, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V125, DOI 10.1029/2019JG005427
   Maddison D, 2006, 10 CEEPA U PRET
   Manandhar S, 2011, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V11, P335, DOI 10.1007/s10113-010-0137-1
   Mango N, 2017, INT SOIL WATER CONSE, V5, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.04.003
   Marie M, 2020, HELIYON, V6, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03867
   Masud MM, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V156, P698, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.060
   Mavhura E., 2017, Clim. Chang, V3, P903
   Menike LMCS, 2016, PROC FOOD SCI, V6, P288, DOI 10.1016/j.profoo.2016.02.057
   Mensah M., 2018, West African Journal of Applied Ecology, V26, P179
   Mkonda MY, 2018, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V10, P435, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-17-0036.1
   Moahid M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12031268
   Moges DM, 2017, INT SOIL WATER CONSE, V5, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.02.003
   Mubiru DN, 2018, CLIM RISK MANAG, V22, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2018.08.004
   Mugi-Ngenga EW, 2016, J RURAL STUD, V43, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.11.004
   Mugwe J, 2009, EXP AGR, V45, P61, DOI 10.1017/S0014479708007072
   Muriu-Ng'ang'a FW, 2017, AGR WATER MANAGE, V194, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.09.005
   Musafiri CM, 2020, SCI AFR, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00458
   Musafiri CM, 2020, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V301, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107064
   Mysiak J, 2016, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V16, P2189, DOI 10.5194/nhess-16-2189-2016
   Ndiritu SW, 2014, FOOD POLICY, V49, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.06.010
   Ngetich KF, 2014, CATENA, V121, P288, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2014.05.026
   Njuki J., 2011, Gender, livestock and livelihood indicators
   Ochenje I.M., 2016, KEN 5 INT C AAAE 23
   Ochieng J, 2017, NAT RESOUR FORUM, V41, P195, DOI 10.1111/1477-8947.12111
   Ochieng J, 2016, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V77, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2016.03.005
   Ogalleh SA, 2012, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V4, P3302, DOI 10.3390/su4123302
   Prtner H.O, 2022, Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, P3056, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844]
   Ray DK, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0217148
   Recha CW, 2012, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V108, P479, DOI 10.1007/s00704-011-0544-3
   Reimer AP, 2012, AGR HUM VALUES, V29, P29, DOI 10.1007/s10460-011-9308-z
   Rondhi M, 2019, LAND-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/land8050081
   Serdeczny O, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P1585, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0910-2
   Shikuku KM, 2017, CLIM RISK MANAG, V16, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2017.03.001
   Sileshi M, 2019, INT SOIL WATER CONSE, V7, P354, DOI 10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.08.002
   Silvestri S, 2012, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V12, P791, DOI 10.1007/s10113-012-0293-6
   Swaminathan MS, 2012, AGR RES, V1, P3, DOI 10.1007/s40003-011-0009-z
   Tambo JA, 2013, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V13, P375, DOI 10.1007/s10113-012-0351-0
   Teklewold H, 2020, WORLD DEV PERSPECT, V18, DOI 10.1016/j.wdp.2020.100206
   Tesfahunegn GB, 2016, APPL GEOGR, V73, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.05.009
   Theis S, 2018, AGR HUM VALUES, V35, P671, DOI 10.1007/s10460-018-9862-8
   Thornton P. K., 2006, Mapping climate vulnerability and poverty in Africa
   Thornton PK, 2017, AGR SYST, V151, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.12.007
   Vanlauwe B, 2015, NAT PLANTS, V1, DOI [10.1038/NPLANTS.2015.101, 10.1038/nplants.2015.101]
   Wang YY, 2014, NEW FOREST, V45, P251, DOI 10.1007/s11056-014-9406-z
   Whitmarsh L., 2018, Psychology and climate change, P13, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-813130-5.00002-3, 10.1016/b978-0-12813130-5.00002-3, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12813130-5.00002-3]
   Wiebe K, 2019, SUSTAINABLE FOOD AND AGRICULTURE: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH, P55, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-812134-4.00004-2
   World Bank, 2021, CLIM CHANG KNOWL POR
   Zhang P, 2019, NEW FOREST, V50, P943, DOI 10.1007/s11056-019-09708-x
NR 84
TC 35
Z9 37
U1 6
U2 26
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0947
J9 WEATHER CLIM EXTREME
JI Weather Clim. Extremes
PD DEC
PY 2021
VL 34
AR 100374
DI 10.1016/j.wace.2021.100374
EA AUG 2021
PG 14
WC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA US6EN
UT WOS:000697520200004
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Kheiri, M
   Kambouzia, J
   Deihimfard, R
   Yaghoubian, I
   Moghaddam, SM
AF Kheiri, Mohammad
   Kambouzia, Jafar
   Deihimfard, Reza
   Yaghoubian, Iraj
   Movahhed Moghaddam, Saghi
TI Response of Rainfed Chickpea Yield to Spatio-Temporal Variability in
   Climate in the Northwest of Iran
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate variability; Impact analysis; Climate adaptation; Legumes;
   Semi-arid regions
ID CICER-ARIETINUM L.; HIGH-TEMPERATURE; POD PRODUCTION; WHEAT;
   PRECIPITATION; GROWTH; IMPACTS; DROUGHT; HEAT; TOLERANCE
AB This study assessed the impact of spatio-temporal changes in weather variables (minimum and maximum temperatures, and precipitation), aridity index (AI), and four agro-climatic indices on grain yield of rainfed chickpea in the northwest of Iran between 1998 and 2017. The four agro-climatic indices were accumulative temperatures less than T-min (TLB), number of days with temperatures less than T-min (DLB), accumulative temperatures above the T-critical (TAC), and number of days with temperatures above the T-critical (DAC). Chickpea grain yield responded negatively to higher temperatures and decreased precipitation. Spatio-temporal variability of monthly weather variables (precipitation and temperature) particularly in May, June, and July played an important role in crop yield determination in the target area during the study period. It was shown that Maragheh and Mianeh, located in the lower half of the study area, have become more arid than other locations during the last 2 decades. Therefore, any small increase in AI in these two locations during June at flowering, could lead to a considerable increase in crop yield. Further, the spatio-temporal analysis showed that TLB and DLB decreased while TAC and DAC increased over the last 2 decades, which had detrimental effects on chickpea grain yield. The negative impacts of DAC and TAC, however, were much higher than those of TLB and DLB. Overall, the warmer seasons and warmer locations, particularly in the more arid area, had more destructive effects on chickpea yield than colder ones during the study period. The findings of this study can be used to enhance understanding of the climate-crop relationships and can help decision-makers to recognize the areas have hazardous climatic condition for chickpea and to forecast regional yield as well. Finally, this approach could be transferrable to other regions, particularly in the arid and semi-arid regions that are experiencing similar problems, to move towards sustainable development goals.
C1 [Kheiri, Mohammad; Kambouzia, Jafar; Deihimfard, Reza] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Environm Sci Res Inst, Dept Agroecol, Tehran, Iran.
   [Yaghoubian, Iraj] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept Agron, Fac Agr, Tehran, Iran.
   [Movahhed Moghaddam, Saghi] Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Fac Environm Sci, Prague, Czech Republic.
C3 Shahid Beheshti University; Tarbiat Modares University; Czech University
   of Life Sciences Prague
RP Kambouzia, J (corresponding author), Shahid Beheshti Univ, Environm Sci Res Inst, Dept Agroecol, Tehran, Iran.
EM J_Kambouzia@sbu.ac.ir
RI Deihimfard, Reza/GZG-2267-2022; Movahhed Moghaddam, Saghi/GXH-9384-2022;
   Kambouzia, Jafar/ACU-6500-2022; Kheiri, Mohammad/HCI-7574-2022
OI Kambouzia, Jafar/0000-0002-2777-3885; Kheiri,
   Mohammad/0000-0002-9244-0067; Movahhed Moghaddam,
   Saghi/0000-0002-2809-9693; Deihimfard, Reza/0000-0001-8251-6315
CR Araghi A, 2016, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V125, P213, DOI 10.1007/s00704-015-1499-6
   Asseng S, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P997, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02262.x
   Bannayan M, 2011, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V55, P387, DOI 10.1007/s00484-010-0348-7
   Bannayan M, 2010, FIELD CROP RES, V118, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.04.011
   Barlow KM, 2015, FIELD CROP RES, V171, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.11.010
   Bathiany S, 2018, SCI ADV, V4, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aar5809
   Chakrabarti B., 2013, Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, V18, P7, DOI 10.1007/s40502-013-0002-6
   CHEN THH, 1983, PLANT PHYSIOL, V73, P773, DOI 10.1104/pp.73.3.773
   Chen Y, 2016, EUR J AGRON, V73, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2015.10.009
   Croitoru AE, 2013, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V112, P597, DOI 10.1007/s00704-012-0755-2
   Croser C, 2001, ENVIRON POLLUT, V115, P9, DOI 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00097-5
   Darand M, 2015, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V1, DOI 10.1007/s40808-015-0010-9
   Devasirvatham V, 2018, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/agronomy8080145
   Dreccer MF, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V248, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.006
   Fang XW, 2010, J EXP BOT, V61, P335, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erp307
   Gaur PM, 2019, PLANT BREEDING, V138, P389, DOI 10.1111/pbr.12641
   Hajjarpoor A, 2018, FIELD CROP RES, V223, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.03.023
   Hatfield JL, 2015, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V10, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001
   Hosseinzadeh SR, 2016, PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V54, P87, DOI 10.1007/s11099-015-0162-x
   Kheiri M, 2021, AGR RES, V10, P556, DOI 10.1007/s40003-020-00523-x
   Kheiri M, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V141, P703, DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-1904-5
   LaViola JJ, 2003, P IEEE VIRT REAL ANN, P283, DOI 10.1109/VR.2003.1191164
   Leport L, 2006, EUR J AGRON, V24, P236, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2005.08.005
   Ludwig F, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V92, P495, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9479-9
   MAJ, 2018, MIN AGR JAH DISTR CR
   Mäkinen H, 2018, FIELD CROP RES, V222, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.11.008
   Mera RJ, 2006, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V54, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2005.11.003
   Nouri M, 2019, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V137, P2771, DOI 10.1007/s00704-019-02766-3
   Rani A, 2020, FRONT PLANT SCI, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2019.01759
   Shah NH, 2003, PLANT SOIL, V257, P219, DOI 10.1023/A:1026237816578
   Singh P, 2014, EUR J AGRON, V52, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2013.09.018
   Soltani A, 2006, FIELD CROP RES, V99, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2006.02.004
   Soltani A, 2001, AGR WATER MANAGE, V49, P225, DOI 10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00143-8
   Soltani A, 2012, EUR J AGRON, V38, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2011.11.010
   Tabari H, 2014, QUATERN INT, V345, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.03.061
   Tabari H, 2013, INT J CLIMATOL, V33, P396, DOI 10.1002/joc.3432
   Tack J, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P6931, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1415181112
   Upadhyaya HD, 2011, CROP SCI, V51, P2079, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2011.01.0018
   Varol IS, 2020, FOOD CHEM, V303, DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125402
   Wang J, 2006, CROP SCI, V46, P2171, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2006.02.0092
NR 40
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 1
U2 6
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 1735-6814
EI 1735-8043
J9 INT J PLANT PROD
JI Int. J. Plant Prod.
PD SEP
PY 2021
VL 15
IS 3
BP 499
EP 510
DI 10.1007/s42106-021-00153-5
EA AUG 2021
PG 12
WC Agronomy
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA UN8DH
UT WOS:000681587800001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Bacha, MS
   Muhammad, M
   Kiliç, Z
   Nafees, M
AF Bacha, Muhammad Suleman
   Muhammad, Muhammad
   Kilic, Zeyneb
   Nafees, Muhammad
TI The Dynamics of Public Perceptions and Climate Change in Swat Valley,
   Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; public perception; climate vulnerability; climate
   adaptation; climate-induced hazards
ID FARMER PERCEPTIONS; EXTREME WEATHER; ADAPTATION; KNOWLEDGE; TRENDS;
   DEFORESTATION; COMMUNITIES; EXPERIENCE; BARRIERS; IMPACTS
AB With rising temperatures, developing countries are exposed to the horrors of climate change more than ever. The poor infrastructure and low adaptation capabilities of these nations are the prime concern of current studies. Pakistan is vulnerable to climate-induced hazards including floods, droughts, water shortages, shifts in weather patterns, loss of biodiversity, melting of glaciers, and more in the coming years. For marginal societies dependent on natural resources, adaptation becomes a challenge and the utmost priority. Within the above context, this study was designed to fill the existing research gap concerning public knowledge of climate vulnerabilities and respective adaptation strategies in the northern Hindukush-Himalayan region of Pakistan. Using the stratified sampling technique, 25 union councils (wards) were selected from the nine tehsils (sub-districts) of the study area. Using the quantitative method approach, structured questionnaires were employed to collect data from 396 respondents. The study reveals varying public perceptions about different factors contributing to the causes and impacts of climate change and the sources of information in the three zones of the study area. The primary causes of climate change are deforestation, industrial waste, anthropogenic impurities, natural causes, and the burning of fossil fuels exacerbated by increased population. Changes in temperature, erratic rainfalls, floods, droughts, receding glaciers, and extreme weather events are some of the impacts observed over the past decades. While limiting the indiscriminate use of fossil fuels combined with government-assisted rehabilitation of forests can help combat climate change, the lack of proper education and economic, social, and governance barriers are hindering the local adaptation strategies. In addition, reduce environmental pollution (air, water, soil, etc.) and plantation polluted areas with suitable plants, are the two main actions in combating climate change. This study recommends policy interventions to enhance local adaptation efforts through building capacity, equipping local environmental institutions, discouraging deforestation, and ensuring sustainable use of natural resources.
C1 [Bacha, Muhammad Suleman; Nafees, Muhammad] Univ Peshawar, Dept Environm Sci, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan.
   [Muhammad, Muhammad] Univ Peshawar, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan.
   [Muhammad, Muhammad] Govt Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Planning & Dev Dept, Urban Policy & Planning Unit, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan.
   [Kilic, Zeyneb] Adiyaman Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-02040 Adiyaman, Turkey.
C3 University of Peshawar; University of Peshawar; Adiyaman University
RP Kiliç, Z (corresponding author), Adiyaman Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-02040 Adiyaman, Turkey.
EM sulemanbachastd@uop.edu.pk; muhammadstd@uop.edu.pk;
   zkilic@adiyaman.edu.tr; nafees@uop.edu.pk
RI Bacha, Muhammad/AAN-9236-2020; Mohammad, Nafees/J-4769-2019
OI Bacha, Muhammad Suleman/0000-0001-5800-2138; Muhammad,
   Dr./0000-0001-6321-9980; Mohammad, Nafees/0000-0002-8717-8092
CR Abbas Z, 2009, CLIM CHANG RESIL, V5, P1
   Ahmad H., 2015, Climate change impacts on high-altitude ecosystems, P49, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-12859-7_2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-12859-7_2]
   Akerlof K, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.006
   Ali K., 2016, S ASIAN J LIFE SCI, V4, P40, DOI [10.14737/journal.sajls/2016/4.2.40.50, DOI 10.14737/JOURNAL.SAJLS/2016/4.2.40.50]
   Alibasic H, 2018, SUSTAIN DEV GOAL SER, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72568-0
   Alibasic H, 2022, PUBLIC INTEGR, V24, P33, DOI 10.1080/10999922.2020.1838142
   [Anonymous], AM J MED SCI, DOI [DOI 10.1007/s11270-007-9372-6, DOI 10.1016/J.AMJMS.2021.03.001,00089-6]
   [Anonymous], 2013, I AGR OLTR IAO GOV K
   [Anonymous], CLIMATE CHANGE 2013
   [Anonymous], 2011, 6 AFR TECHN POL STUD
   [Anonymous], 2011, Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences
   Anwar Sajjad Anwar Sajjad, 2015, American Journal of Plant Sciences, V6, P1501
   Araújo MB, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P1396, DOI 10.1126/science.1131758
   Asian Development Bank Pakistan Floods, 2010, DAM NEEDS ASS TECHN
   Atta-ur-Rahman, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P1239, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9830-8
   Babar Shahbaz Babar Shahbaz, 2007, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, V12, P441, DOI 10.1007/s11027-006-9050-9
   Bacha M. S., 2018, Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, V34, P311, DOI 10.17582/journal.sja/2018/34.2.311.326
   Badshah S., 2010, J SCI TECHNOL, V34, P59
   Bangash S., 2012, A Journal of Peace and Development, V2
   Batool H, 2018, EARTH SYST ENVIRON, V2, P609, DOI 10.1007/s41748-018-0073-7
   Bhikhoo N, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9081440
   Bohensky EL, 2016, CLIM RISK MANAG, V12, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2015.11.004
   Bord RJ, 1998, CLIMATE RES, V11, P75, DOI 10.3354/cr011075
   Bord RJ, 2000, PUBLIC UNDERST SCI, V9, P205, DOI 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/301
   Chaudhry A.U, 2005, PAK GULF EC, V15, P35
   Chaudhry Q., 2017, Climate Change Profile of Pakistan
   Crowe S, 2011, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V11, DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
   Debela N, 2015, SPRINGERPLUS, V4, DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-1012-9
   Deng MZ, 2012, QUATERN INT, V282, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.04.033
   Ding P., 2015, INT J RES ENV STUD, V2, P21
   Downing T, 2006, WHOM BELL TOLLS VULN, P1
   Eckstein D., 2018, GERMANWATCH, P1
   Farooqi A., 2005, Pakistan J. Meteorol, V2, P11
   Gentle P, 2012, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V21, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.007
   Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 2015, KHYB PAKHT WILDL BIO
   Government of Pakistan, 2010, MAN DEV PROJ, P9
   Government of Pakistan, 1999, DISTR CENS REP SWAT
   Haq SMA, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V85, P1759, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2664-7
   Hashemi A, 2016, ENERGIES, V9, DOI 10.3390/en9060468
   Hossain MN, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V83, P1007, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2360-7
   Howe PD, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1488, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.014
   Islam MM, 2014, MAR POLICY, V43, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.06.007
   Kabir MI, 2016, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-2930-3
   Kamal A., 2019, Int. J. Law Soc, V1, P157, DOI [10.11648/j.ijls.20180104.13, DOI 10.11648/J.IJLS.20180104.13]
   Khan N, 2019, FORESTS, V10, DOI 10.3390/f10080703
   KHAN OJ, 2019, J BIODIVERS ENVIRON, V15, P14
   Khan S., 2016, INT J EC ENV GEOL, V7, P24
   Khan SR, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P2607, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.018
   Kruseman G, 2013, ECOL BIODIVERS CONS, P234
   Liu ZW, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P313, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0979-x
   Lorenzoni I, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004
   Lorenzoni I, 2006, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V77, P73, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9072-z
   Maryam A., 2014, J EARTH SCI CLIM CHA, V05, P3, DOI [10.4172/2157-7617.1000183, DOI 10.4172/2157-7617.1000183]
   Meehl GA, 2000, B AM METEOROL SOC, V81, P413, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<0413:AITTIE>2.3.CO;2
   Mirza MMQ, 2003, CLIM POLICY, V3, P233, DOI 10.1016/S1469-3062(03)00052-4
   Niles MT, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V39, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.002
   Norton A., 2004, DAY TOMORROW PUBLIC
   Panda A, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V84, P777, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2456-0
   Pellegrini L, 2011, CORRUPTION, DEVELOPMENT AND THE ENVIRONMENT, P121, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0599-9_7
   Qasim M, 2013, LAND USE POLICY, V34, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.02.008
   Qasim S, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P373, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.001
   Rosenzweig C., 2001, GLOBAL CHANGE HUMAN, V2, P90, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1015086831467
   Sabir M.A., 2002, THESIS U PESHAWAR KY
   Safdar F, 2019, ADV METEOROL, V2019, DOI 10.1155/2019/8281201
   Sekaran S, 2003, CURR BIOL, V13, P1290, DOI 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00510-4
   Shah M, 2012, PAK J BOT, V44, P179
   Smith B, 2000, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V45, P223, DOI 10.1023/A:1005661622966
   Spence A, 2011, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V1, P46, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1059, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1059]
   Suleri Abid Q., 2013, FORESTS LIVELIHOODS, P11
   Ullah W., 2016, International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, V4, P126, DOI [10.11648/j.ijepp.20160405.13, DOI 10.11648/J.IJEPP.20160405.13]
   Vignola R, 2013, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V18, P303, DOI 10.1007/s11027-012-9364-8
   Whitmarsh L.E, 2005, THESIS
   Whitmarsh L, 2008, J RISK RES, V11, P351, DOI 10.1080/13669870701552235
   Willis KJ, 2009, SCIENCE, V326, P806, DOI 10.1126/science.1178838
   Wolf J, 2011, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V2, P547, DOI 10.1002/wcc.120
   Yu H, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V69, P459, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0711-1
NR 76
TC 15
Z9 15
U1 6
U2 26
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD APR
PY 2021
VL 13
IS 8
AR 4464
DI 10.3390/su13084464
PG 22
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA RU7IC
UT WOS:000645316400001
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Biagini, B
   Bierbaum, R
   Stults, M
   Dobardzic, S
   McNeeley, SM
AF Biagini, Bonizella
   Bierbaum, Rosina
   Stults, Missy
   Dobardzic, Saliha
   McNeeley, Shannon M.
TI A typology of adaptation actions: A global look at climate adaptation
   actions financed through the Global Environment Facility
SO GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptation; Global Environment Facility; Typology; Resilience; Climate
   change; Development
AB Climate change impacts threaten existing development efforts and achieving future sustainability goals. To build resilience and societal preparedness towards climate change, integration of adaptation into development is being increasingly emphasized. To date, much of the adaptation literature has been theoretical, reflecting the absence of empirical data from activities on the ground. However, the Funds established under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and managed by the Global Environment Facility, the Least Developed Countries Fund, the Special Climate Change Fund and the Strategic Priority for Adaptation, have approved financing for 133 adaptation projects in 70 countries with sufficient documented experience to allow for initial categorization and evaluation. This article provides the first substantial compendium of adaptation actions identified through the allocation and disbursement of these Funds and organizes these actions into a generalized typology of adaptation activities. The information obtained sheds new insight into what adaptation is, in practice, and suggests some next steps to strengthen the empirical database. Ten types of overarching adaptation activities were identified through an analysis of 92 projects financed through these Funds. This paper analyzes these adaptation activities and compares them with theoretical constructs of adaptation typologies. We find that many of the early ideas and concepts advanced by theoreticians are consistent with results from the field. The adaptation categories that recur the most in Global Environment Facility projects are enabling and relatively inexpensive measures, such as those related to capacity building, policy reform, and planning and management. However, a rich panoply of technical actions ranging from information and communications technology, to early warning systems, to new or improved infrastructure, are also identified as common project goals. Future refinements of the costs of various adaptation actions, the mixture of technical and management options, and evaluating the efficacy of actions implemented, will be key to informing the future global adaptation agenda. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Biagini, Bonizella] UN Dev Programme, New York, NY 10017 USA.
   [Bierbaum, Rosina] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
   [Bierbaum, Rosina] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
   [Stults, Missy] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm & Urban & Reg Planni, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
   [Dobardzic, Saliha] Global Environm Facil, Washington, DC 20433 USA.
   [McNeeley, Shannon M.] Colorado State Univ, North Cent Climate Sci Ctr, Nat Resources Ecol Lab, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA.
C3 University of Michigan System; University of Michigan; University of
   Michigan System; University of Michigan; University of Michigan System;
   University of Michigan; Colorado State University
RP Bierbaum, R (corresponding author), Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, 4034 Dana Bldg,440 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
EM emailbonizella.biagini@undp.org; rbierbau@umich.edu
CR Abiodun BJ, 2013, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V13, P477, DOI 10.1007/s10113-012-0381-7
   Agrawala S, 2011, CLIM CHANG ECON, V2, P175, DOI 10.1142/S2010007811000267
   [Anonymous], 2003, 2 LDCS INT I ENV DEV
   [Anonymous], 2010, Evaluation of Assessment of Geology of National Parks, P1
   [Anonymous], 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007
   Ayers JM, 2009, DEV POLICY REV, V27, P675, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2009.00465.x
   Barros V, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, pIX
   Berrang-Ford L, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.012
   Biagini B., 2013, COMMUNICATION   0112
   Bierbaum R, 2013, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V18, P361, DOI 10.1007/s11027-012-9423-1
   Biesbroek GR, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P440, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.005
   Bijlsma L., 1996, Climate Change 1995-Impacts, P289
   Broto VC, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005
   Bryant A., 2002, J INFORM TECHNOLOGY, V4, P25
   Burton Ian., 1993, The Environment as Hazard
   Carter T.R., 1994, INTERGOVERNMENTAL PA
   Charmaz K., 2010, The sage handbook of grounded theory
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Djoudi H, 2013, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V13, P493, DOI 10.1007/s10113-011-0262-5
   Dupuis J, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1476, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.022
   Eakin H, 2009, ADAPTING TO CLIMATE CHANGE: THRESHOLDS, VALUES, GOVERNANCE, P212
   Eisenack K, 2012, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V17, P451, DOI 10.1007/s11027-011-9336-4
   Eisenack K, 2012, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V17, P243, DOI 10.1007/s11027-011-9323-9
   Felgenhauer T, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1556, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.018
   Fidelman PIJ, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P800, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.016
   Ford JD, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.10.008
   Fussel H.-M., 2012, climate change, justice and sustainability, P311
   Glaser B.G., 1994, More Grounded Theory Methodology: A Reader
   Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries, 2013, Standards for Marine Mammal Sanctuaries, P1
   Hall JW, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P833, DOI 10.1038/nclimate1749
   Huq Saleemul., 2005, Adaptation to climate change: A paper for the International Climate Change Taskforce
   Joint Science Academies, 2008, JOINT SCI AC STAT CL
   Joint Science Academies, 2005, JOINT SCI AC STAT GL
   Kates RW, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P7156, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1115521109
   Klein RJT, 2005, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V8, P579, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.06.010
   Lesnikowski AC, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1153, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.008
   Lesnikowski AC, 2011, ENVIRON RES LETT, V6, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044009
   Miles M.B., 1994, Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, V2nd, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1098-2140(99)80125-8, 10.1016/S1098-2140(99)80125-8]
   Mills J., 2006, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, V5, P25, DOI [10.1177/160940690600500103, DOI 10.1177/160940690600500103]
   O'Sullivan R., 2011, CREATION EVOLUTION A, P1
   OECD, 2006, AD CLIM CHANG KEY TE
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Peterson TC, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P1041, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00021.1
   Redford K., 2013, MAINSTREAMING BIODIV
   Reid H, 2010, INT YEAR PLANET EART, P217, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-8716-4_11
   Schipper E., 2007, Climate change adaptation and development: Exploring the linkages
   Schipper E.L.F., 2006, Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law, V15, P82, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1467-9388.2006.00501.X, 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2006.00501.x]
   Skinner M.W., 2004, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V7, P85
   Smit B., 2000, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V45, P19, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1005661622966
   Smit B, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008
   Smit B, 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P877
   Smith JB, 1996, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V92, P229
   Smithers J, 1997, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V7, P129, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(97)00003-4
   Strauss A., 1967, DISCOV GROUNDED THEO
   The World Bank, 2012, TURN HEAT WHY 4 C WA, P106
   Thornberg R, 2012, SCAND J EDUC RES, V56, P243, DOI 10.1080/00313831.2011.581686
   Tompkins EL, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.11.002
   Tompkins EL, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P627, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.05.001
   Travis WR, 2010, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V98, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10584-009-9661-8
   Tschakert P, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.008
   UKCIP, 2005, TECHNICAL REPORT
   Wilbanks TJ, 1999, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V43, P601, DOI 10.1023/A:1005418924748
   World Bank, 2010, WORLD DEV REP CLIM C
   World Bank, 2013, REP WORLD BANK POTSD
   Yohe G, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V106, P71, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9997-0
NR 65
TC 143
Z9 166
U1 4
U2 15
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0959-3780
EI 1872-9495
J9 GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG
JI Glob. Environ. Change-Human Policy Dimens.
PD MAR
PY 2014
VL 25
BP 97
EP 108
DI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.003
PG 12
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies; Geography
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography
GA AG7ZI
UT WOS:000335636900011
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Buma, B
   Wessman, CA
AF Buma, B.
   Wessman, C. A.
TI Forest resilience, climate change, and opportunities for adaptation: A
   specific case of a general problem
SO FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience; Climate change; Adaptive management; Forest disturbance
   recovery; Carbon sequestration; Modeling
ID COMPOUNDED PERTURBATIONS; ASSISTED MIGRATION; CARBON; VEGETATION;
   WILDFIRE; MANAGEMENT; RESPONSES; BLOWDOWN; IMPACTS; FIRE
AB Ecosystems and ecosystem services are subjected to both typical disturbances (e.g., fire) and shifting climatic baselines resulting from anthropogenic drivers. Recovery from these perturbations is of prime interest to researchers and land managers. We explore how differing regeneration of the coniferous forest to specific disturbances and a shifting climate are mediated through managerial responses, in terms of both species composition and an important ecosystem service, carbon sequestration in the southern Rocky Mountains, Colorado, USA. 112 sites across a variety of disturbance histories were surveyed for post-fire regeneration; carbon stock growth was then simulated in the US Forest Service Forest Vegetation Simulator under a variety of climate change scenarios for 100 years. Simultaneously, we simulated three managerial responses to the disturbance: no action, planting of local species (resilience-oriented management), and planting of the most climatically suitable species (adaptation-oriented management). These managerial responses simulate varying levels of intervention which attempt to maintain forest properties and associated carbon stocks. Carbon stocks, initially, were more resilient than the coniferous forest system; areas with little coniferous regeneration recovered carbon at a similar pace due to an influx of deciduous seedlings. However, future climate exerts a strong influence on carbon stocks. Both the no-action scenario and the resilience-oriented management scenario transitioned to non-forest by the end of the simulation period, due to climatic changes. Active, adaptation-oriented management, which included establishment of non-local species, maintained forest structure and carbon stocks under most future climate projections, albeit at lower densities. So while this preserves the presence of a forest, it does not preserve the presence of a specific forest. However, for ecosystem services associated with the mere existence of forest cover (e.g., carbon stocks and general forest habitat), this may be sufficient. In a sense, disturbances are opportunities for more climatically-adapted species/communities to establish, although the complexities of assisted migration and novel ecosystems remain. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Buma, B.] Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.
   CIRES, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.
C3 University of Colorado System; University of Colorado Boulder;
   University of Colorado System; University of Colorado Boulder
RP Buma, B (corresponding author), Univ Colorado, 216 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.
EM brian.buma@colorado.edu
FU University of Colorado Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,
   CIRES; National Science Foundation; Division Of Environmental Biology;
   Direct For Biological Sciences [1119819] Funding Source: National
   Science Foundation
FX Funding for this research came from the University of Colorado
   Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, CIRES, and the National
   Science Foundation. Becky Poore provided excellent feedback on the
   initial manuscript. We would also like to thank Eva Adler, Danielle
   Clucky, Adam Markovits, and Austin Rempel for considerable field help.
   Two reviewers made comments that greatly improved the manuscript.
CR Anderegg WRL, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P233, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1107891109
   [Anonymous], 2010, ArcMap 9.2
   [Anonymous], 1974, INT16 USDA FOR SERV
   Baker WL, 2002, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V168, P63, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00730-7
   Bowler R, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V269, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.011
   Brown CD, 2011, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V20, P829, DOI 10.1071/WF10113
   Brown CD, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V266, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.006
   Brown M, 2010, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V150, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.008
   Buma B, 2011, ECOSPHERE, V2, DOI 10.1890/ES11-00038.1
   Buma B, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V266, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.040
   Chapin FS, 2007, AMBIO, V36, P528, DOI 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[528:MCCITE]2.0.CO;2
   Crookston NL, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V260, P1198, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.013
   D'Amato AW, 2011, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V262, P2070, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.09.003
   Dale VH, 2001, BIOSCIENCE, V51, P723, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0723:CCAFD]2.0.CO;2
   Davidson EA, 2006, NATURE, V440, P165, DOI 10.1038/nature04514
   Flannigan MD, 2009, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V18, P483, DOI 10.1071/WF08187
   Gray LK, 2011, ECOL APPL, V21, P1591, DOI 10.1890/10-1054.1
   Gunderson L.H., 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V9, P439
   Hampe A, 2004, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V13, P469, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2004.00090.x
   Hartmann H, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P642, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02248.x
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hurteau M, 2009, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V7, P409, DOI 10.1890/080049
   Jenkins JC, 2003, FOREST SCI, V49, P12
   Johnstone JF, 2003, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V9, P1401, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00661.x
   Kashian DM, 2006, BIOSCIENCE, V56, P598, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[598:CSOLWS]2.0.CO;2
   Kulakowski D, 2007, ECOLOGY, V88, P759, DOI 10.1890/06-0124
   Lal R, 2005, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V220, P242, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.015
   Lawler JJ, 2009, ECOLOGY, V90, P588, DOI 10.1890/08-0823.1
   Loarie SR, 2009, NATURE, V462, P1052, DOI 10.1038/nature08649
   Mbogga MS, 2010, J APPL ECOL, V47, P731, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01830.x
   McDowell NG, 2011, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V26, P523, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.003
   McLachlan JS, 2007, CONSERV BIOL, V21, P297, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00676.x
   Melson Susanna L, 2011, Carbon Balance Manag, V6, P2, DOI 10.1186/1750-0680-6-2
   Millar CI, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P2145, DOI 10.1890/06-1715.1
   Minckley TA, 2012, ECOL MONOGR, V82, P49, DOI 10.1890/11-0283.1
   Moritz MA, 2012, ECOSPHERE, V3, DOI 10.1890/ES11-00345.1
   Paine RT, 1998, ECOSYSTEMS, V1, P535, DOI 10.1007/s100219900049
   Pearson RG, 2004, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V13, P471, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2004.00112.x
   Rebain S.A., 2010, INTERNAL REP, p[366, 406]
   Rehfeldt GE, 1999, ECOL MONOGR, V69, P375, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0375:GRTCIP]2.0.CO;2
   Rehfeldt GE, 2009, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V258, P2353, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.005
   Scheller RM, 2007, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V22, P491, DOI 10.1007/s10980-006-9048-4
   Seidl R, 2011, CAN J FOREST RES, V41, P694, DOI [10.1139/X10-235, 10.1139/x10-235]
   Smith J.E., 2002, NE722 USDA FOR SERV, P37
   Solomon AM, 2008, FORESTRY AND CLIMATE CHANGE, P151, DOI 10.1079/9781845932947.0151
   Tepe TL, 2011, RESTOR ECOL, V19, P295, DOI 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00748.x
   Veblen T.T., 2000, Forest Fragmentation in the Southern Rocky Mountains, Colorado, P31
   Wessman CA., 2004, Land Change Science ed
   Westerling AL, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P940, DOI 10.1126/science.1128834
   Westerling AL, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P13165, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1110199108
   Worrall JJ, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V260, P638, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.05.020
NR 51
TC 64
Z9 79
U1 3
U2 194
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0378-1127
EI 1872-7042
J9 FOREST ECOL MANAG
JI For. Ecol. Manage.
PD OCT 15
PY 2013
VL 306
BP 216
EP 225
DI 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.044
PG 10
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA 228MI
UT WOS:000325190500025
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Rekioua, D
   Mokrani, Z
   Kakouche, K
   Rekioua, T
   Oubelaid, A
   Logerais, PO
   Ali, E
   Bajaj, M
   Berhanu, M
   Ghoneim, SSM
AF Rekioua, D.
   Mokrani, Z.
   Kakouche, K.
   Rekioua, T.
   Oubelaid, A.
   Logerais, P. O.
   Ali, Enas
   Bajaj, Mohit
   Berhanu, Milkias
   Ghoneim, Sherif S. M.
TI Optimization and intelligent power management control for an autonomous
   hybrid wind turbine photovoltaic diesel generator with batteries
SO SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
LA English
DT Article
ID ENERGY-CONVERSION SYSTEM; PREDICTIVE CONTROL; PERFORMANCE; ALGORITHM;
   NETWORKS
AB In this paper, a critical issue related to power management control in autonomous hybrid systems is presented. Specifically, challenges in optimizing the performance of energy sources and backup systems are proposed, especially under conditions of heavy loads or low renewable energy output. The problem lies in the need for an efficient control mechanism that can enhance power availability while protecting and extending the lifespan of the various power sources in the system. Furthermore, it is necessary to adapt the system's operations to variations in climatic conditions for sustained effectiveness. To address the identified problem. It is proposed the use of an intelligent power management control (IPMC) system employing fuzzy logic control (FLC). The IPMC is designed to optimize the performance of energy sources and backup systems. It aims to predict and adjust the system's operating processes based on variations in climatic conditions, providing a dynamic and adaptive control strategy. The integration of FLC is specifically emphasized for its effectiveness in balancing multiple power sources and ensuring a steady and secure operation of the system. The proposed IPMC with FLC offers several advantages over existing strategies. Firstly, it showcases enhanced power availability, particularly under challenging conditions such as heavy loads or low renewable energy output. Secondly, the system protects and extends the lifespan of the power sources, contributing to long-term sustainability. The dynamic adaptation to climatic variations adds a layer of resilience to the system, making it well-suited for diverse geographical and climatic conditions. The use of realistic data and simulations in MATLAB/Simulink, along with real-time findings from the RT-LAB simulator, indicates the reliability and practical applicability of the proposed IPMC strategy. Efficient load supply and preserved batteries further underscore the benefits of the fuzzy logic-based control strategy in achieving a well-balanced and secure system operation.
C1 [Rekioua, D.; Mokrani, Z.; Kakouche, K.; Rekioua, T.; Oubelaid, A.] Univ Bejaia, Fac Technol, Lab LTII, Bejaia 06000, Algeria.
   [Logerais, P. O.] Univ Paris Est, CERTES, IUT Senart Fontainebleau, Lieusaint, France.
   [Ali, Enas] Future Univ Egypt, Fac Engn & Technol, New Cairo 11835, Egypt.
   [Bajaj, Mohit] Graphic Era, Dept Elect Engn, Dehra Dun 248002, India.
   [Bajaj, Mohit] Graphic Era Hill Univ, Dehra Dun 248002, India.
   [Bajaj, Mohit] Appl Sci Private Univ, Appl Sci Res Ctr, Amman 11937, Jordan.
   [Berhanu, Milkias] Adama Sci & Technol Univ, Dept Elect Power & Control Engn, Adama, Ethiopia.
   [Ghoneim, Sherif S. M.] Taif Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Elect Engn, POB 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.
C3 Universite de Bejaia; Universite Paris-Est-Creteil-Val-de-Marne (UPEC);
   Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Future University in Egypt; Graphic Era
   University; Adama Science & Technology University; Taif University
RP Bajaj, M (corresponding author), Graphic Era, Dept Elect Engn, Dehra Dun 248002, India.; Bajaj, M (corresponding author), Graphic Era Hill Univ, Dehra Dun 248002, India.; Bajaj, M (corresponding author), Appl Sci Private Univ, Appl Sci Res Ctr, Amman 11937, Jordan.; Berhanu, M (corresponding author), Adama Sci & Technol Univ, Dept Elect Power & Control Engn, Adama, Ethiopia.
EM thebestbajaj@gmail.com; mil_ber2000@astu.edu.et
RI REKIOUA, Djamila/C-3011-2011; KAKOUCHE, Khoudir/GWZ-2756-2022; oubelaid,
   Adel/GPC-5308-2022; MOKRANI, Zahra/KHZ-7040-2024; Ghoneim,
   Sherif/AAE-9390-2020; Bajaj, Mohit/AAD-9602-2019; LOGERAIS,
   Pierre-Olivier/O-4042-2019; kakouche, khoudir/KHZ-7440-2024; Berhanu,
   Milkias/ABF-2456-2021; REKIOUA, Toufik/P-2973-2018
OI MOKRANI, Zahra/0009-0000-8996-0128; kakouche,
   khoudir/0000-0001-6365-5029; Bajaj, Mohit/0000-0002-1086-457X; Berhanu,
   Milkias/0000-0001-7223-9238; REKIOUA, Toufik/0000-0002-6258-5708
FU Deanship of Scientific Research, Taif University
FX The researchers would like to acknowledge the Deanship of Scientific
   Research, Taif University for funding this work.
CR Abid MS, 2023, J ENERGY STORAGE, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.est.2023.108276
   Aissou R, 2016, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V41, P21047, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.109
   Aziz AS, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030683
   Bai X, 2021, IEEE T AERO ELEC SYS, V57, P3279, DOI 10.1109/TAES.2021.3074204
   Bakare Mutiu Shola, 2023, Energy Informatics, DOI 10.1186/s42162-023-00262-7
   Belaid S., 2022, Period. Polytech. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci, V66, P60, DOI [10.3311/PPee.18758, DOI 10.3311/PPEE.18758]
   Belaid S, 2022, J ENERGY STORAGE, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.est.2021.103613
   Bovera F, 2023, SUSTAIN ENERGY GRIDS, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.segan.2023.101152
   Chao KH, 2021, ENERGIES, V14, DOI 10.3390/en14102902
   Chen HP, 2023, INT J ELEC POWER, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109420
   Dada M, 2023, BENI-SUEF U J BASIC, V12, DOI 10.1186/s43088-023-00405-5
   Dai W, 2022, IEEE T IND INFORM, V18, P2331, DOI 10.1109/TII.2021.3096840
   Duan YZ, 2023, SUSTAIN ENERGY GRIDS, V34, DOI 10.1016/j.segan.2023.101004
   Durakovic B., 2023, BUILDING ENERGY FLEX, P63
   Durani F, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V420, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138334
   Eke I, 2021, ENG SCI TECHNOL, V24, P899, DOI 10.1016/j.jestch.2020.12.023
   El Hassani S, 2023, J ENERGY STORAGE, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.est.2023.107853
   El Zerk A, 2023, ENERGIES, V16, DOI 10.3390/en16052244
   Eltamaly AM, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11072091
   Gómez JCL, 2023, ENG BASEL, V4, P1446, DOI 10.3390/eng4020084
   Hassani H, 2020, J ENERGY STORAGE, V31, DOI 10.1016/j.est.2020.101644
   Huang NT, 2021, IEEE T INSTRUM MEAS, V70, DOI 10.1109/TIM.2020.3025396
   Huang S, 2021, ENG APPL COMP FLUID, V15, P1113, DOI 10.1080/19942060.2021.1939790
   Ibrahim O, 2023, ENERG CONVERS MAN-X, V18, DOI 10.1016/j.ecmx.2023.100354
   Idjdarene K, 2011, ANALOG INTEGR CIRC S, V69, P67, DOI 10.1007/s10470-011-9629-2
   Islam S, 2023, ENERGY REP, V9, P6063, DOI 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.05.063
   Kakouche K, 2022, SENSORS-BASEL, V22, DOI 10.3390/s22155669
   Kumar V, 2022, ENERG SOURCE PART A, V44, P10694, DOI 10.1080/15567036.2022.2156637
   Kumari N, 2023, PROT CONTR MOD POW, V8, DOI 10.1186/s41601-023-00317-7
   Lalouni S, 2014, J ELECTR SYST, V10, P484
   Li DY, 2022, IEEE T SYST MAN CY-S, V52, P2450, DOI 10.1109/TSMC.2021.3050183
   Li JW, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104917
   Li LF, 2024, IEEE T AUTOM SCI ENG, V21, P2638, DOI 10.1109/TASE.2023.3266065
   Li P, 2022, IEEE T CONTROL NETW, V9, P356, DOI 10.1109/TCNS.2021.3104103
   Li X, 2023, NANO ENERGY, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108979
   Liang J, 2023, OCEAN ENG, V271, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113785
   Liao K, 2022, IEEE T IND ELECTRON, V69, P12874, DOI 10.1109/TIE.2021.3139177
   Lin L, 2023, PLOS ONE, V18, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0281482
   Liu GH, 2021, IEEE COMMUN MAG, V59, P132, DOI 10.1109/MCOM.001.2000921
   Liu KY, 2023, IET GENER TRANSM DIS, V17, P2996, DOI 10.1049/gtd2.12855
   Liu X, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12040831
   Liu ZY, 2023, APPL ENERG, V350, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121714
   Luo P, 2023, IEEE T INSTRUM MEAS, V72, DOI 10.1109/TIM.2023.3241994
   Mebarki N, 2015, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V40, P13777, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.024
   Ouari K, 2014, ISA T, V53, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.isatra.2013.08.004
   Radhika A, 2020, SOFT COMPUT, V24, P16719, DOI 10.1007/s00500-020-04966-w
   Refaat M. M., 2017, 2017 INT C ADV CONTR, P27
   Rekioua Djamila, 2009, 2009 21st International Conference on Microelectronics (ICM 2009), P378, DOI 10.1109/ICM.2009.5418603
   Rekioua D., 2020, Green Energy and Technology, P1
   Rekioua D., 2005, Int. J. Emerg. Electr. Power Syst, V4, P1
   Rekioua D., 2012, Green Energy and Technology, V102
   Rekioua D, 2020, GREEN ENERGY TECHNOL, P79, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-34021-6_3
   Rekioua D, 2018, ADVANCES IN RENEWABLE ENERGIES AND POWER TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 1: SOLAR AND WIND ENERGIES, P349, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-812959-3.00011-3
   Algarín CR, 2018, DATA BRIEF, V21, P1618, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2018.11.023
   Samosir AS., 2018, Int. J. Electr. Comput. Engineeing, V8, P1315, DOI [10.11591/ijece.v8i3.pp1315-1323, DOI 10.11591/IJECE.V8I3.PP1315-1323]
   Shen YP, 2024, IEEE T ENERGY CONVER, V39, P555, DOI 10.1109/TEC.2023.3306804
   Song H, 2023, APPL ENERG, V352, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121860
   Song J, 2022, IEEE T INSTRUM MEAS, V71, DOI 10.1109/TIM.2022.3220300
   Song J, 2022, IEEE T INSTRUM MEAS, V71, DOI 10.1109/TIM.2022.3203459
   Su YR, 2023, ISCIENCE, V26, DOI 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107347
   Taib N, 2013, INT J ELEC POWER, V53, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.05.019
   Wang HX, 2022, CSEE J POWER ENERGY, V8, P983, DOI 10.17775/CSEEJPES.2021.01270
   Wang L., 2023, Rare Metals, V42, P12
   Wang Z, 2024, J ENERGY STORAGE, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.est.2023.109432
   Wu ZC, 2022, IEEE T DIELECT EL IN, V29, P1651, DOI 10.1109/TDEI.2022.3193652
   Xiao S, 2024, IEEE T TRANSP ELECTR, V10, P364, DOI 10.1109/TTE.2023.3283668
   Xiao TY, 2023, APPL THERM ENG, V223, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120039
   Xingjia Yao, 2010, 2010 International Conference on Computer, Mechatronics, Control and Electronic Engineering (CMCE 2010), P482, DOI 10.1109/CMCE.2010.5610461
   Yang ML, 2023, IEEE T ENERGY CONVER, V38, P2146, DOI 10.1109/TEC.2023.3260244
   Yang S, 2023, RENEW ENERG, V219, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119423
   Yang X, 2023, J HAZARD MATER, V459, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132209
   Yang XY, 2023, ISA T, V137, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.isatra.2022.12.013
   Zahedi R, 2022, SUSTAIN ENERGY GRIDS, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.segan.2022.100809
   Zhang XL, 2022, AUTOMATICA, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.automatica.2021.110114
   Zhang XZ, 2023, IEEE T TRANSP ELECTR, V9, P5165, DOI 10.1109/TTE.2022.3194034
   Zhao JY, 2023, INT J ELEC POWER, V144, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108572
   Zhou SH, 2024, IEEE T TRANSP ELECTR, V10, P2408, DOI 10.1109/TTE.2023.3293811
   Zhou SH, 2023, IEEE T IND ELECTRON, V70, P1467, DOI 10.1109/TIE.2022.3156169
   Zhu DH, 2024, IEEE T POWER ELECTR, V39, P664, DOI 10.1109/TPEL.2023.3319134
   Zhu LW, 2023, HIGH VOLT, V8, P739, DOI 10.1049/hve2.12302
NR 80
TC 16
Z9 16
U1 1
U2 5
PU NATURE PORTFOLIO
PI BERLIN
PA HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, BERLIN, 14197, GERMANY
SN 2045-2322
J9 SCI REP-UK
JI Sci Rep
PD DEC 9
PY 2023
VL 13
IS 1
AR 21830
DI 10.1038/s41598-023-49067-4
PG 31
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA AM2X8
UT WOS:001118828300047
PM 38071265
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Alberto-Payet, F
   Lassus, R
   Isla, A
   Daufresne, M
   Sentis, A
AF Alberto-Payet, Fanny
   Lassus, Remy
   Isla, Alejandro
   Daufresne, Martin
   Sentis, Arnaud
TI Nine years of experimental warming did not influence the thermal
   sensitivity of metabolic rate in the medaka fish <i>Oryzias latipes</i>
SO FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE ectotherms; metabolic cold adaptation theory; metabolic theory of
   ecology; metabolism; universal thermal dependence theory
ID INTERMITTENT-FLOW RESPIROMETRY; COLD ADAPTATION; RESPIRATORY METABOLISM;
   ENZYMATIC-ACTIVITIES; JAPANESE MEDAKA; TEMPERATURE; ACCLIMATION;
   PHYSIOLOGY; PATTERNS; SYSTEM
AB A pressing challenge is to determine whether and how global-change drivers influence species physiology and survival. Recently, researchers have proposed the metabolic theory of ecology, defending the hypothesis of a universal thermal dependence of metabolic rate or, alternatively, the metabolic cold adaptation theory, stating that local adaptation can influence the thermal sensitivity of metabolic rate. However, the long-term (i.e. multigenerational) consequences of warming for the thermal sensitivity of metabolic rate remain largely unexplored although it determines energy use and is crucial for species response to climate change. In this study, we used an evolutionary experiment with medaka fishes Oryzias latipes maintained for more than 12 generations at warm and cold temperatures (30 and 20 degrees C, respectively) to address this issue. Our objective was to investigate whether thermal adaptation influences the relationship between temperature and mass-corrected metabolic rate and how this may occur. In agreement with the universal thermal dependence hypothesis, we found that warming did not significantly influence the thermal sensitivity of mass-corrected metabolic rate: neither the intercept nor the slope of the temperature-metabolic rate relationship differed among fish lineages. Our small-scale laboratory experiment thus indicated that there is limited potential for evolutionary change in medaka fish metabolic rate in response to warmer temperatures. Overall, we provide evidence that 9 years of experimental warming did not influence the thermal sensitivity of metabolic rate. Our results highlight the invariability of the thermal dependence of metabolic rate, which has important implications for adaptation to climate warming. This finding suggests a limited potential for metabolic adaptations in response to long-term temperature changes, which may have negative consequences for the persistence of fish populations under climate change.
C1 [Alberto-Payet, Fanny; Lassus, Remy; Daufresne, Martin; Sentis, Arnaud] Aix Marseille Univ, INRAE, UMR RECOVER, Aix En Provence, France.
   [Isla, Alejandro] CSIC, Spanish Inst Oceanog, IEO, Gijon, Spain.
C3 Aix-Marseille Universite; INRAE; Spanish Institute of Oceanography;
   Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC)
RP Sentis, A (corresponding author), INRAE, UMR RECOVER, 3275 Route Cezanne, F-13182 Aix En Provence, France.
EM arnaud.sentis@inrae.fr
RI Sentis, Arnaud/K-5004-2014; Daufresne, Martin/JGE-5174-2023
OI DAUFRESNE, MARTIN/0009-0004-4604-4903
FU Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-19-CE02-0001-01]; Agence Nationale
   de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-19-CE02-0001] Funding Source: Agence
   Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
FX Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Grant/Award Number:
   ANR-19-CE02-0001-01
CR Addo-Bediako A, 2002, FUNCT ECOL, V16, P332, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00634.x
   Angilletta MJ, 2009, BIO HABIT, P1, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570875.001.1
   Archer LC, 2019, J ANIM ECOL, V88, P1670, DOI 10.1111/1365-2656.13060
   Arrhenius S., 1889, Z PHYS CHEM, V4, P226, DOI [10.1515/zpch-1889-0416, DOI 10.1515/ZPCH-1889-0416]
   Bates D, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V67, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Boukal DS, 2019, CURR OPIN INSECT SCI, V35, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.cois.2019.06.014
   Brown JH, 2004, ECOLOGY, V85, P1771, DOI 10.1890/03-9000
   Chown SL, 1999, BIOL REV, V74, P87, DOI 10.1017/S000632319800526X
   Chown SL, 1997, PHYSIOL ZOOL, V70, P116, DOI 10.1086/639554
   Danchin É, 2011, NAT REV GENET, V12, P475, DOI 10.1038/nrg3028
   Dhillon RS, 2007, ECOL FRESHW FISH, V16, P425, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2007.00240.x
   Dias BG, 2014, NAT NEUROSCI, V17, P89, DOI 10.1038/nn.3594
   Donelson JM, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P30, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1323
   Gillooly JF, 2001, SCIENCE, V293, P2248, DOI 10.1126/science.1061967
   Glazier DS, 2015, BIOL REV, V90, P377, DOI 10.1111/brv.12115
   Herrera-R GA, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P5509, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15285
   HIRSHFIELD MF, 1980, ECOLOGY, V61, P282, DOI 10.2307/1935187
   Kawall HG, 2002, MAR BIOL, V140, P279, DOI 10.1007/s002270100695
   Lardies MA, 2004, EVOL ECOL RES, V6, P567
   Leaf RT, 2011, COPEIA, P559, DOI 10.1643/CI-09-190
   LEE RE, 1982, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V28, P725, DOI 10.1016/0022-1910(82)90131-7
   Loisel A, 2019, J THERM BIOL, V84, P460, DOI 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.07.029
   Moffett ER, 2018, ECOLOGY, V99, P2318, DOI 10.1002/ecy.2463
   Nelson G.C., 2005, MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM
   Nyboer EA, 2017, J EXP BIOL, V220, P3782, DOI 10.1242/jeb.163022
   NYLUND L, 1991, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS A, V100, P853, DOI 10.1016/0300-9629(91)90303-T
   Pilakouta N, 2020, FUNCT ECOL, V34, P1205, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13538
   Quintero I, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P1095, DOI 10.1111/ele.12144
   Reveillon T, 2019, OIKOS, V128, P1633, DOI 10.1111/oik.06392
   Sala OE, 2000, SCIENCE, V287, P1770, DOI 10.1126/science.287.5459.1770
   Sandblom E, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms11447
   SCHOLANDER PF, 1953, PHYSIOL ZOOL, V26, P67, DOI 10.1086/physzool.26.1.30152151
   Sentis A, 2017, ECOL LETT, V20, P852, DOI 10.1111/ele.12779
   Sentis A, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P3290, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12931
   Shima A, 2004, MECH DEVELOP, V121, P599, DOI 10.1016/j.mod.2004.03.011
   Snyder S, 2016, J FISH BIOL, V88, P252, DOI 10.1111/jfb.12837
   Somero GN, 2012, ANNU REV MAR SCI, V4, P39, DOI 10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100935
   Steffensen JF, 2002, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS A, V132, P789, DOI 10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00048-X
   Su GH, 2021, SCIENCE, V371, P835, DOI 10.1126/science.abd3369
   Svendsen MBS, 2016, J FISH BIOL, V88, P26, DOI 10.1111/jfb.12797
   TORRES JJ, 1988, MAR BIOL, V98, P169, DOI 10.1007/BF00391192
   Vucic-Pestic O, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P1301, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02329.x
   Wang HY, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-17937-4
   Wang YJ, 2021, FUNCT ECOL, V35, P1538, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13810
   YOUNG SR, 1979, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V25, P361, DOI 10.1016/0022-1910(79)90025-8
   Yvon-Durocher G, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P2117, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0038
   Zuur Alain F., 2009, P1
NR 47
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 5
U2 42
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0046-5070
EI 1365-2427
J9 FRESHWATER BIOL
JI Freshw. Biol.
PD MAR
PY 2022
VL 67
IS 3
BP 577
EP 585
DI 10.1111/fwb.13864
EA DEC 2021
PG 9
WC Ecology; Marine & Freshwater Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Marine & Freshwater Biology
GA YV2BH
UT WOS:000729483600001
OA Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wang, CL
   Shen, SH
   Zhang, SY
   Li, QZ
   Yao, YB
AF Wang Chun-ling
   Shen Shuang-he
   Zhang Shu-yu
   Li Qiao-zhen
   Yao Yu-bi
TI Adaptation of potato production to climate change by optimizing sowing
   date in the Loess Plateau of central Gansu, China
SO JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE
LA English
DT Article
DE potato; climate change; optimum sowing date; growth and development;
   tuber yield
ID PLANTING DATE; YIELD; GROWTH; PHENOLOGY; GENOTYPES; DURATION; IMPACT;
   ROOT; CROP; UK
AB Potato grows in most part of China, it achieves higher yield and better quality in Gansu Province than in others. With global warming, its growth duration has been prolonged and sowing date become earlier than before. Therefore, to regulate its sowing date and growing period is of great significance for better harvest. In this study, experiments were conducted with six sowing-date treatments of potato in Dingxi, which is in the Loess Plateau of central Gansu Province in Northwest China in 2010. The growth period, morphological index and change in yield and their relationships with temperature, precipitation, and other climatic factors were investigated for each treatment. Results show that the crop with different sowing dates experienced different climate conditions, leading to distinct growth duration, plant height, and leaf area index. The growth duration was shortened due to a delay in sowing date. For each 15-day delay in sowing, the growth duration was reduced by 12 days on average. A significant linear relationship was found between numbers of days either from seeding to emergence or from flowering to harvest and mean temperature over the corresponding period. Dry matter accumulation, tuber fresh weight, and final yield were all decreased because of insufficient cumulative temperature over the shorter growing periods. Marked differences in tuber yield were discovered among the six treatments of sowing date, the potato planted on May 27 giving the highest yield. The potato planted either earlier or later would produce invariably lower yield than the treatment of May 27. Late May therefore can be taken as the optimum sowing time of potato in this region because the crop can fully utilize thermal resource. We conclude that to postpone sowing time is a good practice for potato production to adapt to climate warming in the Loess Plateau of central Gansu, China.
C1 [Wang Chun-ling] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Appl Meteorol, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
   [Shen Shuang-he] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast & Evaluat Meteoro, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
   [Wang Chun-ling; Zhang Shu-yu; Li Qiao-zhen; Yao Yu-bi] China Meteorol Adm, Lanzhou Inst Arid Meteorol, Key Lab Arid Climate Change & Reducing Disaster G, Lanzhou 730020, Peoples R China.
   [Li Qiao-zhen; Yao Yu-bi] Meteorol Bur Dingxi City, Dingxi 743000, Peoples R China.
C3 Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology; China
   Meteorological Administration
RP Shen, SH (corresponding author), Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Appl Meteorol, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
EM wangchunling668@126.com; yqzhr@nuist.edu.cn
FU Scientific Research and Innovation Plan for College Graduates of Jiangsu
   Province, China [CXZZ13_0521]
FX This work was supported by the Scientific Research and Innovation Plan
   for College Graduates of Jiangsu Province, China (CXZZ13_0521).
CR Arab H. R., 2011, Journal of Research in Agricultural Science, V7, P141
   Bassu S, 2009, FIELD CROP RES, V111, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2008.11.002
   Chakraborty S, 2000, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V97, P3724, DOI 10.1073/pnas.050012697
   Cleland EE, 2007, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V22, P357, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2007.04.003
   Costa L. dalla, 1997, Potato Research, V40, P19, DOI 10.1007/BF02407559
   [邓振镛 Deng Zhengyong], 2012, [冰川冻土, Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology], V34, P855
   Dong HZ, 2006, FIELD CROP RES, V98, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.12.008
   Dornbusch T, 2011, FIELD CROP RES, V121, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.12.004
   Ferrise R, 2010, FIELD CROP RES, V117, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.03.010
   Haas BJ, 2009, NATURE, V461, P393, DOI 10.1038/nature08358
   Harnney M A, 1966, EUR POTATO J, V9, P145
   Hassanpanah D, 2009, J FOOD AGRIC ENVIRON, V7, P525
   HAVERKORT AJ, 1990, AGR SYST, V32, P251, DOI 10.1016/0308-521X(90)90004-A
   Hijmans RJ, 2003, AM J POTATO RES, V80, P271, DOI 10.1007/BF02855363
   Hoffmann CM, 2010, FIELD CROP RES, V119, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.07.014
   Jaggard KW, 2007, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V145, P367, DOI 10.1017/S0021859607006922
   Jiang G, 2007, SHAANXI METEOROLOGIC, V2, P44
   Kapsa JS, 2008, POTATO RES, V51, P385, DOI 10.1007/s11540-008-9114-1
   Kooman PL, 1996, EUR J AGRON, V5, P207, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(96)02032-1
   Kooman PL, 1996, EUR J AGRON, V5, P193, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(96)02031-X
   Laux P, 2010, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V150, P1258, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.05.008
   Li P.H., 1985, POTATO PHYSL, P1
   Menzel A, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P1969, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01193.x
   Miglietta F, 1998, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V4, P163, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00120.x
   Paz JO, 2012, AGR SYST, V111, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.05.004
   Richter GM, 2006, SOIL USE MANAGE, V22, P39, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2006.00018.x
   Schwartz MD, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P343, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01097.x
   Scott GJ, 2000, FOOD POLICY, V25, P561, DOI 10.1016/S0306-9192(99)00087-1
   Seifert JR, 2006, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V223, P371, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.11.019
   Stalham MA, 2001, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V137, P251, DOI 10.1017/S0021859601001332
   Steyn HM, 1996, J ARID ENVIRON, V32, P407, DOI 10.1006/jare.1996.0034
   van Oort PAJ, 2012, EUR J AGRON, V40, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2012.02.005
   Van Oort PAJ, 2012, EUR J AGRON, V37, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2011.09.002
   [王毅荣 Wang Yirong], 2006, [宁夏大学学报. 自然科学版, Journal of Ningxia University. Natural Science Edition], V27, P93
   [姚玉璧 YAO Yu-bi], 2009, [中国农业气象, Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology], V30, P208
   Zhang Kai, 2012, Shengtaixue Zazhi, V31, P2261
   [张强 ZHANG Qiang], 2008, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V28, P1210
   Zhao H, 2012, AGR WATER MANAGE, V104, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.11.016
NR 38
TC 25
Z9 29
U1 6
U2 62
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 2095-3119
J9 J INTEGR AGR
JI J. Integr. Agric.
PY 2015
VL 14
IS 2
BP 398
EP 409
DI 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60783-8
PG 12
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA CB3GL
UT WOS:000349516100023
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wilby, RL
   Orr, H
   Watts, G
   Battarbee, RW
   Berry, PM
   Chadd, R
   Dugdale, SJ
   Dunbar, MJ
   Elliott, JA
   Extence, C
   Hannah, DM
   Holmes, N
   Johnson, AC
   Knights, B
   Milner, NJ
   Ormerod, SJ
   Solomon, D
   Timlett, R
   Whitehead, PJ
   Wood, PJ
AF Wilby, R. L.
   Orr, H.
   Watts, G.
   Battarbee, R. W.
   Berry, P. M.
   Chadd, R.
   Dugdale, S. J.
   Dunbar, M. J.
   Elliott, J. A.
   Extence, C.
   Hannah, D. M.
   Holmes, N.
   Johnson, A. C.
   Knights, B.
   Milner, N. J.
   Ormerod, S. J.
   Solomon, D.
   Timlett, R.
   Whitehead, P. J.
   Wood, P. J.
TI Evidence needed to manage freshwater ecosystems in a changing climate:
   Turning adaptation principles into practice
SO SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; Ecosystem; Freshwater; Adaptation; Monitoring; Planning;
   Multi-disciplinary
ID STREAM TEMPERATURE; FLOW CONTROLS; POTENTIAL IMPACTS; RIPARIAN WOODLAND;
   RIVER TEMPERATURE; UPLAND STREAM; BIODIVERSITY; FOREST; CONSERVATION;
   PERSPECTIVE
AB It is widely accepted that climate change poses severe threats to freshwater ecosystems. Here we examine the scientific basis for adaptively managing vulnerable habitats and species. Our views are shaped by a literature survey of adaptation in practice, and by expert opinion. We assert that adaptation planning is constrained by uncertainty about evolving climatic and non-climatic pressures, by difficulties in predicting species- and ecosystem-level responses to these forces, and by the plasticity of management goals. This implies that adaptation measures will have greatest acceptance when they deliver multiple benefits, including, but not limited to, the amelioration of climate impacts. We suggest that many principles for biodiversity management under climate change are intuitively correct but hard to apply in practice. This view is tested using two commonly assumed doctrines: "increase shading of vulnerable reaches through tree planting" (to reduce water temperatures); and "set hands off flows" (to halt potentially harmful abstractions during low flow episodes). We show that the value of riparian trees for shading, water cooling and other functions is partially understood, but extension of this knowledge to water temperature management is so far lacking. Likewise, there is a long history of environmental flow assessment for allocating water to competing uses, but more research is needed into the effectiveness of ecological objectives based on target flows. We therefore advocate more multi-disciplinary field and model experimentation to test the cost-effectiveness and efficacy of adaptation measures applied at different scales. In particular, there is a need for a major collaborative programme to: examine natural adaptation to climatic variation in freshwater species; identify where existing environmental practice may be insufficient; review the fitness of monitoring networks to detect change; translate existing knowledge into guidance; and implement best practice within existing regulatory frameworks. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Wilby, R. L.; Wood, P. J.] Univ Loughborough, Dept Geog, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England.
   [Orr, H.; Watts, G.] Environm Agcy, Climate Change Sci Programme, Bristol, Avon, England.
   [Battarbee, R. W.] UCL, Environm Change Res Centre, London WC1E 6BT, England.
   [Berry, P. M.] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Oxford OX1 3QY, England.
   [Chadd, R.; Extence, C.] Environm Agcy, Anglian No, Lincoln LN2 5HA, England.
   [Dugdale, S. J.] APEM Ltd, Stockport SK4 3GN, Lancs, England.
   [Dunbar, M. J.; Johnson, A. C.] Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford OX10 8BB, Oxon, England.
   [Elliott, J. A.] Lancaster Environm Ctr, Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Lancaster LA1 4AP, England.
   [Hannah, D. M.] Univ Birmingham, Sch Geog, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England.
   [Holmes, N.] Alconbury Environm Consultants, Huntingdon PE17 2RW, England.
   [Knights, B.] Kings Coll London, Dept Geog, London WC2R 2LS, England.
   [Milner, N. J.] Univ Bangor, Sch Biol Sci, APEM Ltd, Bangor LL57 2UW, Gwynedd, Wales.
   [Ormerod, S. J.] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff Sch Biosci, Cardiff CF10 3US, S Glam, Wales.
   [Solomon, D.] Fisheries Consultant, Salisbury SP5 2HT, Wilts, England.
   [Timlett, R.] WWF UK, Godalming GU7 1XR, Surrey, England.
   [Whitehead, P. J.] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, Oxford OX1 3QY, England.
C3 Loughborough University; University of London; University College
   London; University of Oxford; UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH);
   UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH); Lancaster University;
   University of Birmingham; University of London; King's College London;
   Bangor University; Cardiff University; World Wildlife Fund; University
   of Oxford
RP Wilby, RL (corresponding author), Univ Loughborough, Dept Geog, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England.
EM r.l.wilby@lboro.ac.uk
RI Dunbar, Michael/C-5212-2009; Elliott, James/I-6862-2012; whitehead,
   paul/K-8689-2012; Watts, Glenn/H-1255-2011; Wood, Paul/C-2627-2012; Orr,
   Harriet/AAP-2665-2020; Johnson, Andrew/C-5551-2008; Dugdale,
   Stephen/K-4251-2015; Hannah, David/B-9221-2015; Ormerod, Stephen
   J/A-4326-2010
OI Berry, Pam/0000-0002-1201-072X; Johnson, Andrew/0000-0003-1570-3764;
   Watts, Glenn/0009-0005-6789-8550; Dugdale, Stephen/0000-0003-3561-4216;
   Orr, Harriet/0000-0001-5021-1074; Wilby, Robert/0000-0002-4662-9344;
   Hannah, David/0000-0003-1714-1240; Ormerod, Stephen
   J/0000-0002-8174-302X; Wood, Paul/0000-0003-4629-3163
CR Acreman M, 2004, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V8, P861, DOI 10.5194/hess-8-861-2004
   Acreman M, 2009, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V162, P13, DOI 10.1680/ensu.2009.162.1.13
   Acreman MC, 2010, FRESHWATER BIOL, V55, P32, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02181.x
   Acreman M, 2008, HYDROLOG SCI J, V53, P1105, DOI 10.1623/hysj.53.6.1105
   Allen MR, 2009, NATURE, V458, P1163, DOI 10.1038/nature08019
   [Anonymous], BIODIVERSITY BALANCE
   [Anonymous], 2007, EEA Tech. Report no. 2/2007
   [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis
   [Anonymous], CLIM CHANG AD MIT DE
   [Anonymous], ADAPTING WATER CHANG
   [Anonymous], CLIMATE PROJECTIONS
   [Anonymous], 2003, FOR WAT GUID
   [Anonymous], 2008, ENS UKS FOOD SEC CHA
   [Anonymous], RIVER ITCHEN MACROIN
   [Anonymous], AD CLIM CHANG CHECKL
   Araújo MB, 2006, J BIOGEOGR, V33, P1712, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01482.x
   Araújo MB, 2004, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V10, P1618, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00828.x
   Aveling R, 2009, ORYX, V43, P311, DOI 10.1017/S0030605309990366
   BARTON D R, 1985, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, V5, P364, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1985)5<364:DORBSR>2.0.CO;2
   Bates B.C., 2008, Climate Change and Water, Technical Paper of the Intergovern-Mental Panel on Climate Change, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JMB.2010.08.039
   Battin J, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P6720, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701685104
   Broadmeadow S, 2004, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V8, P286, DOI 10.5194/hess-8-286-2004
   BROADMEADOW S, 2009, RIVER RES APPL, V26, P1
   BROWN GW, 1970, WATER RESOUR RES, V6, P1133, DOI 10.1029/WR006i004p01133
   Bunn SE, 2002, ENVIRON MANAGE, V30, P492, DOI 10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0
   Caissie D, 2006, FRESHWATER BIOL, V51, P1389, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01597.x
   Chen YD, 1998, J ENVIRON ENG, V124, P304, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1998)124:4(304)
   Clark MJ, 2002, AQUAT CONSERV, V12, P347, DOI 10.1002/aqc.531
   Clark PE, 2008, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V61, P339, DOI 10.2111/07-012.1
   Clarke Stewart J., 2009, Freshwater Reviews, V2, P51, DOI 10.1608/FRJ-2.1.3
   Clayton S., 2009, CONSERVATION PSYCHOL
   Clenaghan C, 1998, FRESHWATER BIOL, V40, P175, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1998.00330.x
   CONLAN K, 2007, SC030300SR ENV AG
   Cottingham P., 2002, AUSTR J WATER RESOUR, V5, P103, DOI [10.1080/13241583.2002.11465196, DOI 10.1080/13241583.2002.11465196]
   Dallas H, 2008, WATER SA, V34, P393
   *DEFR, 2006, FCDPAG3 EC APPR SUPP
   *DEFR, 2009, FUT OUR FARM
   DESCLERS S, 2010, SR070035 ENV AG
   Dessai S, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.004
   Dudgeon D, 2006, BIOL REV, V81, P163, DOI 10.1017/S1464793105006950
   Dunbar MJ, 2010, FRESHWATER BIOL, V55, P226, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02306.x
   Durance I, 2007, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V13, P942, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01340.x
   Elliott JA, 2008, FRESHWATER BIOL, V53, P32, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01865.x
   Erwin KL, 2009, WETL ECOL MANAG, V17, P71, DOI 10.1007/s11273-008-9119-1
   *EUR, 2008, EUR LIMP POS PAP IMP
   Fischlin A, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P211
   Franklin P, 2008, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V400, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.018
   FUNG CF, 2009, SC050045 ENV AG
   Gomi T, 2006, WATER RESOUR RES, V42, DOI 10.1029/2005WR004162
   Graham CT, 2009, J FISH BIOL, V74, P1143, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02180.x
   Hallegatte S, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.12.003
   Hannah DM, 2008, HYDROL PROCESS, V22, P919, DOI 10.1002/hyp.7003
   Hansen LJ., 2003, Buying time. A user's manual for building resistance and resilience to climate change in natural systems
   Harrison PA, 2008, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V90, P113, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9454-5
   HAWKINS CP, 1982, ECOLOGY, V63, P1840, DOI 10.2307/1940125
   Hawkins E, 2009, B AM METEOROL SOC, V90, P1095, DOI 10.1175/2009BAMS2607.1
   Hedger RD, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V197, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.028
   Heino J, 2009, BIOL REV, V84, P39, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00060.x
   Heller NE, 2009, BIOL CONSERV, V142, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.006
   HILL WR, 1995, ECOLOGY, V76, P1297, DOI 10.2307/1940936
   Hill WR, 2001, ECOLOGY, V82, P2306, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2306:SERTFL]2.0.CO;2
   Hopkins J.J., 2007, CONSERVING BIODIVERS
   Hulme PE, 2005, J APPL ECOL, V42, P784, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01082.x
   Johnson AC, 2009, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V407, P4787, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.018
   Jones PD, 2006, INT J CLIMATOL, V26, P219, DOI 10.1002/joc.1252
   Kaushal SS, 2010, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V8, P461, DOI 10.1890/090037
   Kundzewicz ZW, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P173
   Langan SJ, 2001, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V265, P195, DOI 10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00659-8
   Larsen S, 2009, FRESHWATER BIOL, V54, P203, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02093.x
   Lopez A, 2009, WATER RESOUR RES, V45, DOI 10.1029/2008WR007499
   Malcolm IA, 2008, HYDROL PROCESS, V22, P968, DOI 10.1002/hyp.6996
   Malcolm IA, 2004, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V8, P449, DOI 10.5194/hess-8-449-2004
   Marcus WA, 2008, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V33, P4, DOI 10.1002/esp.1637
   Marshall S, 1998, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V46, P175, DOI 10.1006/ecss.1997.0268
   McClure MM, 2008, EVOL APPL, V1, P300, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00030.x
   Meyer JL, 1999, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V35, P1373, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb04222.x
   Milly PCD, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P573, DOI 10.1126/science.1151915
   Milner AM, 2009, HYDROL PROCESS, V23, P62, DOI 10.1002/hyp.7197
   Monk WA, 2008, RIVER RES APPL, V24, P988, DOI 10.1002/rra.1120
   Mooij WM, 2005, AQUAT ECOL, V39, P381, DOI 10.1007/s10452-005-9008-0
   Moore RD, 2005, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V41, P813, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb04465.x
   Moss Brian, 2009, Freshwater Reviews, V2, P103, DOI 10.1608/FRJ-2.2.1
   Mulholland PJ, 1997, HYDROL PROCESS, V11, P949
   NAKAMURA F, 1989, Journal of the Japanese Forestry Society, V71, P387
   Nel JL, 2009, AQUAT CONSERV, V19, P474, DOI 10.1002/aqc.1010
   Ormerod SJ, 2009, AQUAT CONSERV, V19, P609, DOI 10.1002/aqc.1062
   ORMEROD SJ, 1991, IBIS, V133, P53, DOI 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1991.tb04810.x
   Orr HG, 2008, CLIM RES, V37, P77, DOI 10.3354/cr00754
   Orr HG, 2008, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V100, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.10.022
   OSBORNE LL, 1993, FRESHWATER BIOL, V29, P243, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00761.x
   Palmer MA, 2009, ENVIRON MANAGE, V44, P1053, DOI 10.1007/s00267-009-9329-1
   Parasiewicz P., 2001, Archiv fuer Hydrobiologie Supplement, V135, P239
   Parry M, 2009, NATURE, V458, P1102, DOI 10.1038/4581102a
   Paterson JS, 2008, CONSERV BIOL, V22, P1352, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01042.x
   Pelini SL, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P11160, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0900284106
   Petersen I, 2004, J APPL ECOL, V41, P934, DOI 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00942.x
   PETTS G, 1995, ECOLOGICAL BASIS FOR RIVER MANAGEMENT, P1
   Petts GE, 2009, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V45, P1071, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00360.x
   Poff NL, 1997, BIOSCIENCE, V47, P769, DOI 10.2307/1313099
   Poiani A, 2006, ADV ECOL RES, V39, P63, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2504(06)39004-6
   Poole GC, 2001, ENVIRON MANAGE, V27, P787, DOI 10.1007/s002670010188
   Prtner H.O, 2022, Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, P3056, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844]
   Rahel FJ, 2008, CONSERV BIOL, V22, P521, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00950.x
   Ratcliffe N, 2005, J APPL ECOL, V42, P834, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01076.x
   Richards JA, 2008, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V90, P141, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9451-8
   Richter BD, 1997, FRESHWATER BIOL, V37, P231, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00153.x
   Scholze M, 2006, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V103, P13116, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0601816103
   Seavy N. E., 2009, Ecological Restoration, V27, P330, DOI 10.3368/er.27.3.330
   Solomon D.J., 2008, The thermal biology of brown trout and Atlantic salmon: science report
   SOLOMON DJ, 2005, SC040025 ENV AG
   Stubbington R, 2009, HYDROL PROCESS, V23, P2252, DOI 10.1002/hyp.7290
   Sutherland WJ, 2009, CONSERV BIOL, V23, P557, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01212.x
   Sutherland WJ, 2006, J APPL ECOL, V43, P617, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01188.x
   SWIFT LW, 1971, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V26, P111
   Thackeray SJ, 2008, J ECOL, V96, P523, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01355.x
   Tharme RE, 2003, RIVER RES APPL, V19, P397, DOI 10.1002/rra.736
   Todd CD, 2008, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V14, P958, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01522.x
   Torgersen CE, 2001, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V76, P386, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00186-9
   TOWNS DR, 1981, NEW ZEAL J MAR FRESH, V15, P185, DOI 10.1080/00288330.1981.9515911
   Vos CC, 2008, J APPL ECOL, V45, P1722, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01569.x
   Wade AJ, 2002, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V282, P375, DOI 10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00925-1
   Wade AJ, 2006, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V365, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.054
   Walsh CL, 2007, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V11, P1125, DOI 10.5194/hess-11-1127-2007
   WEATHERLEY NS, 1990, FRESHWATER BIOL, V24, P109, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1990.tb00312.x
   Webb BW, 2008, HYDROL PROCESS, V22, P902, DOI 10.1002/hyp.6994
   Webb BW, 2007, HYDROLOG SCI J, V52, P74, DOI 10.1623/hysj.52.1.74
   West JM, 2009, ENVIRON MANAGE, V44, P1001, DOI 10.1007/s00267-009-9345-1
   Whitehead PG, 2006, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V365, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.040
   Whitehead PG, 2009, HYDROLOG SCI J, V54, P101, DOI 10.1623/hysj.54.1.101
   Whitehead PG, 2009, HYDROL RES, V40, P113, DOI 10.2166/nh.2009.078
   Wilby RL, 2006, ENVIRON INT, V32, P1043, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.017
   Wilby RL, 1998, J CHART INST WATER E, V12, P179
   Wilby RL, 2006, WATER RESOUR RES, V42, DOI 10.1029/2005WR004065
   WILBY RL, WEATHER IN PRESS
   WILBY RL, 2008, METAANALYSIS CLIMA 1
   Wilby Robert L., 2004, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, V4, P243
   Williams RJ, 2009, ENVIRON TOXICOL CHEM, V28, P220, DOI 10.1897/08-047.1
   Willis KJ, 2006, SCIENCE, V314, P1261, DOI 10.1126/science.1122667
   Winfield IJ, 2010, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V650, P55, DOI 10.1007/s10750-009-0078-1
   WINFIELD IJ, 2008, REV RECENT IN PRESS
   Xenopoulos MA, 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V11, P1557, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001008.x
   Xenopoulos MA, 2006, ECOLOGY, V87, P1907, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1907:GWTFUS]2.0.CO;2
NR 142
TC 129
Z9 142
U1 0
U2 140
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0048-9697
EI 1879-1026
J9 SCI TOTAL ENVIRON
JI Sci. Total Environ.
PD SEP 1
PY 2010
VL 408
IS 19
BP 4150
EP 4164
DI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.014
PG 15
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 638SW
UT WOS:000280917300022
PM 20538318
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Bachmann, L
   Lex, R
   Regli, F
   Vögeli, S
   Mühlhofer, E
   Mccaughey, JW
   Hanger-Kopp, S
   Bresch, DN
   Kropf, CM
AF Bachmann, Lisa
   Lex, Ricarda
   Regli, Florian
   Vogeli, Saira
   Muhlhofer, Evelyn
   Mccaughey, Jamie W.
   Hanger-Kopp, Susanne
   Bresch, David N.
   Kropf, Chahan M.
TI Climate-resilient strategy planning using the SWOT methodology: A case
   study of the Japanese wind energy sector
SO CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Natural hazard risk modeling; Climate change; Climate adaptation; SWOT;
   Strategic management; Renewables; Tropical cyclones; Typhoons; Japan;
   Wind energy
ID RENEWABLE ENERGY; MODEL; RISK; WEATHER; DESIGN; POLICY
AB As climate change leads to more frequent and intense extreme weather events, industry stakeholders and policymakers must assess their business strategies, practices, and entire sector policies under these uncertain conditions. Much recent research has integrated quantitative climate risk modeling into frameworks to engage policymakers and inform adaptation decisions in a general way, but relatively little attention has been devoted to extending this to strategic business and investment decisions. This falls short of identifying economic opportunities and threats in a wider socio-economic context, such as the development of new technologies or evolving political and regulatory environments. Here, a methodology is developed to integrate quantitative climate risk modeling with SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) which is commonly used in business and investment strategic planning. This moves the focus from avoidance of negative outcomes to prospective planning in an evolving environment. This methodology is illustrated with a case study of the Japanese wind energy sector, using open-access data and the open-source climate risk-assessment platform CLIMADA. This Climate risk assessment indicates threats from increasing damages to the wind energy infrastructure, as well as the profitability of typhoon-resistant wind turbines under present and future climate. Expert interviews and extensive literature research on opportunities and threats, however, also show that the transition towards renewable energies faces restrictive market dynamics, political and social hurdles, which set external conditions surpassing physically- informed dimensions. Beyond this illustrative case study, the methodology developed here bridges established concepts in climate risk modeling and strategic management and thus can be used to identify industry-centric ways forward for climate-resilient planning across a wide range of economic sectors.
C1 [Bachmann, Lisa; Lex, Ricarda; Regli, Florian; Vogeli, Saira; Muhlhofer, Evelyn; Mccaughey, Jamie W.; Hanger-Kopp, Susanne; Bresch, David N.; Kropf, Chahan M.] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Decis, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
   [Bresch, David N.; Kropf, Chahan M.] Fed Off Meteorol & Climatol MeteoSwiss, Zurich, Switzerland.
C3 Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology Domain; ETH Zurich; Federal
   Office of Meteorology & Climatology (MeteoSwiss)
RP Lex, R (corresponding author), Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Decis, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
EM riclex@student.ethz.ch; jamie.mccaughey@usys.ethz.ch
RI Kropf, Chahan/O-4777-2016
OI Kropf, Chahan/0000-0002-3761-2292; Hanger, Susanne/0000-0001-7223-9991
FU European Union [101003687]
FX The authors would like to thank the interview experts Prof. Rudolph
   Rechsteiner and Prof. Ndaona Chokani for their valuable input and
   expertise as well as their sincere insights. This project received
   funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation
   Program grant agreement No 101003687 (PROVIDE) .
CR Abdelilah Y., 2020, Technical Report
   Adams C. W., 2015, Handbook of practical program evaluation, P492, DOI [10.1002/9781119171386.ch19, DOI 10.1002/9781119171386.CH19, 10.1002/9781119171386.CH19]
   [Anonymous], 2020, Vestas
   [Anonymous], 2016, Economics of Climate Adapatation (ECA)-Guidebook for Practitioners
   Attema AE, 2018, PHARMACOECONOMICS, V36, P745, DOI 10.1007/s40273-018-0672-z
   Aznar-Siguan G, 2019, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V12, P3085, DOI 10.5194/gmd-12-3085-2019
   Bauer L., 2023, Compare power curves of wind turbines
   Benincasa E, 2024, J CORP FINANC, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2023.102508
   Benzaghta M. A., 2021, JGBI, V6, P55, DOI [DOI 10.5038/2640-6489.6.1.1148, 10.5038/2640-6489.6.1.1148]
   Biljecki F, 2023, BUILD ENVIRON, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110295
   Blewett D., 2023, Wind Turbine Cost: How Much? Are They Worth It
   Bloemendaal N, 2022, SCI ADV, V8, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abm8438
   Bloemendaal N, 2020, SCI DATA, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41597-020-0381-2
   Bresch DN, 2021, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V14, P351, DOI 10.5194/gmd-14-351-2021
   Brockway AM, 2020, CLIM RISK MANAG, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2020.100256
   Burstein F., 2008, Handbook on Decision Support Systems, V1, DOI [10.1007/978-3-540-48713-5, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-48713-5]
   Carr D., 2022, Technical Report
   Carrillo C, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V21, P572, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.012
   Challenergy Inc, 2020, Technical Report
   Chen WM, 2014, ENERG POLICY, V74, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.019
   Chen Z, 2009, IEEE T POWER ELECTR, V24, P1859, DOI 10.1109/TPEL.2009.2017082
   Cheng C, 2022, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115299
   Chokani N, 2005, PHYS FLUIDS, V17, DOI 10.1063/1.1825471
   Chou JS, 2019, J WIND ENG IND AEROD, V193, DOI 10.1016/j.jweia.2019.103962
   Ciais P., 2013, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013
   Clifton A, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024009
   Culp III K, 2016, Using a SWOT analysis: taking a look at your organization
   Davis NN, 2023, B AM METEOROL SOC, V104, pE1507, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0075.1
   Donat MG, 2020, CLIMATE EXTREMES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR IMPACT AND RISK ASSESSMENT, P31, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-814895-2.00003-3
   Dupuis N., 2021, Introduction to the Japanese power market
   Ebi KL, 2021, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V42, P293, DOI 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-012420-105026
   Eremit B., 2016, Individuelle PersONlichkeitsentwicklung: Growing By Transformation: Quick Finder-Die Wichtigsten Tools Im Business Coaching, P125, DOI [10.1007/978-3-658-09453-921, DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-09453-921]
   Esteban M, 2014, ENERGY, V68, P756, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.045
   Eurus Energy Holding Corporation, 2023, List of projects of eurus energy group. Projects in Japan
   Eyring V, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P1937, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
   Farrokhnia M, 2024, INNOV EDUC TEACH INT, V61, P460, DOI 10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
   Fraser T, 2020, ENVIRON POLIT, V29, P500, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2019.1589037
   Gamesa S, 2021, Technical Report
   General Electric, 2018, Riders on the storm: GE is building a wind turbine that can weather violent typhoons, hurricanes
   Global Patroleum Prices (GPP), 2023, Household electricity prices worldwide in march 2023, by select country
   Gonzales GM, 2021, PHILIPPINE E J APPL, V11, P14
   Haarsma RJ, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P4185, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016
   Hewitson B, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1133
   Holland G, 2008, MON WEATHER REV, V136, P3432, DOI 10.1175/2008MWR2395.1
   IEA, 2018, Technical Report
   IEA, 2021, Technical Report
   IEA, 2021, Technical Report
   Iglinski B, 2016, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V18, P45, DOI 10.1007/s10098-015-0989-7
   IRENA, 2022, Renewable energy roadmaps
   Jeon S, 2015, ENERGY, V93, P1769, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2015.09.086
   Karjalainen O, 2019, SCI DATA, V6, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2019.37
   Knapp KR, 2010, B AM METEOROL SOC, V91, P363, DOI 10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1
   Knutson T, 2020, B AM METEOROL SOC, V101, pE303, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0194.1
   Komiyama R, 2021, SUSTAIN SCI, V16, P429, DOI 10.1007/s11625-021-00907-0
   Kropf CM, 2022, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V15, P7177, DOI 10.5194/gmd-15-7177-2022
   Matsumoto K, 2022, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V162, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112456
   MERVIS J, 1990, SCIENTIST, V4, P1
   Mizuno E, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V40, P999, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.184
   Mori N, 2021, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2021.100309
   Morthorst P.E., 2008, Wind energy-the facts Part III the economics of wind power
   Muhlhofer E., 2023, **DATA OBJECT**, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.8082964
   Mühlhofer E, 2024, ENVIRON RES COMMUN, V6, DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/ad15ab
   Namugenyi C, 2019, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V159, P1145, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.283
   Nayak S, 2020, METEOROL APPL, V27, DOI 10.1002/met.1954
   NREL, 2022, 2022 cost of wind energy review
   Obane H, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V160, P842, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.018
   OSM, OpenStreetMap Wiki
   Parkes R., 2022, Recharge
   Pesonen HL, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V64, P562, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.013
   Rechsteiner R., 2023, Expert interview. personal communication
   Rose S, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P2126, DOI 10.1111/risa.12085
   Sammut-Bonnici T, 2015, Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, P1, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118785317.WEOM120103
   Schwalm CR, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P19656, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2007117117
   Seneviratne S. I., 2021, Climate Change 2021-The Physical Science Basis, P1513, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781009157896.013, 10.1017/9781009157896.013]
   Siguan G.A., 2023, CLIMADA-project/climada_python: v4.0.1, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.8383171, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.8383171]
   Sillmann J, 2021, EARTHS FUTURE, V9, DOI 10.1029/2020EF001783
   Stalhandske Z., 2023, arXiv, DOI [10.31223/X56W9N, DOI 10.31223/X56W9N]
   Steffen B, 2020, JOULE, V4, P359, DOI 10.1016/j.joule.2019.11.012
   Suenaga I., 2020, Technical Report
   Sun YP, 2023, CLIM RISK MANAG, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2022.100474
   Swiss Re, 2024, Technical Report
   Taleb N.N., 2007, The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, V2nd
   Verma A, 2021, NATURE, V591, P199, DOI 10.1038/d41586-021-00580-4
   Vestas, 2022, Vestas turbines V117-4.2 mwTM
   Vivoda V, 2014, TRANSFORM ENV POLIT, P1
   Vousdoukas MI, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-04692-w
   Walsh KJE, 2019, TROP CYCLONE RES REV, V8, P240, DOI 10.6057/2019TCRR04.04
NR 87
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0963
J9 CLIM RISK MANAG
JI CLIM. RISK MANAG.
PY 2024
VL 46
AR 100665
DI 10.1016/j.crm.2024.100665
PG 15
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA N7H7I
UT WOS:001366009000001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Liang, K
   Qi, JY
   Zhang, XS
   Emmett, B
   Johnson, JMF
   Malone, RW
   Moglen, GE
   Venterea, RT
AF Liang, Kang
   Qi, Junyu
   Zhang, Xuesong
   Emmett, Bryan
   Johnson, Jane M. F.
   Malone, Robert W.
   Moglen, Glenn E.
   Venterea, Rodney T.
TI Simulated nitrous oxide emissions from multiple agroecosystems in the US
   Corn Belt using the modified SWAT-C model
SO ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Greenhouse gases; Agroecosystem; Process-based modeling; Crop management
ID N2O EMISSIONS; GENERALIZED-MODEL; CROPPING SYSTEMS; SOIL;
   DENITRIFICATION; WATER; CARBON; NITRIFICATION; CALIBRATION; MANAGEMENT
AB Agriculture is a major source of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions into the atmosphere. However, assessing the impacts of agricultural conservation practices, land use change, and climate adaptation measures on N2O emissions at a large scale is a challenge for process-based model applications. Here, we integrated six N2O emission algorithms for the nitrification processes and seven N2O emission algorithms for the denitrification process into the Soil and Water Assessment Tool-Carbon (SWAT-C). We evaluated the different combinations of methods in simulating N2O emissions under corn (Zea mays L.) production systems with various conservation practices, including fertilization, tillage, and crop rotation (represented by 14 experimental treatments and 83 treatment-years) at five experimental sites across the U.S. Midwest. The SWAT-C model exhibited wide variability in simulating daily average N2O emissions across treatment-years with different method configurations, as indicated by the ranges of R2, NSE, and BIAS (0.04-0.68, - 1.78-0.60, and - 0.94-0.001, respectively). Our results indicate that the denitrification process has a stronger impact on N2O emissions than the nitrification process. The best performing N2O emission algorithms are those rooted in the CENTURY model, which considers soil pH and respiration effects that were overlooked by other algorithms. The optimal N2O emission algorithm explained about 63% of the variability of annual average N2O emissions, with NSE and BIAS of 0.60 and -0.033, respectively. The model can reasonably represent the impacts of agricultural conservation practices on N2O emissions. We anticipate that the improved SWAT-C model, with its flexible configurations and robust modeling and assessment capabilities, will provide a valuable tool for studying and managing N2O emissions from agroecosystems.
C1 [Liang, Kang; Qi, Junyu] Univ Maryland, Earth Syst Sci Interdisciplinary Ctr, College Pk, MD 20740 USA.
   [Zhang, Xuesong; Moglen, Glenn E.] USDA ARS Hydrol & Remote Sensing Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA.
   [Emmett, Bryan; Malone, Robert W.] USDA ARS Natl Lab Agr & Environm, Ames, IA 50011 USA.
   [Johnson, Jane M. F.] USDA ARS North Cent Soil Conservat Res Lab, Morris, MN 56267 USA.
   [Venterea, Rodney T.] USDA ARS, Soil & Water Management Unit, St Paul, MN 55108 USA.
   [Venterea, Rodney T.] Univ Minnesota Twin Cities, Dept Soil Water & Climate, St Paul, MN 55108 USA.
C3 University System of Maryland; University of Maryland College Park;
   United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); University of Minnesota
   System; University of Minnesota Twin Cities
RP Zhang, XS (corresponding author), USDA ARS Hydrol & Remote Sensing Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA.
EM xuesong.zhang@usda.gov
RI malone, rob/JYP-5668-2024; Venterea, Rodney/A-3930-2009; Zhang,
   Xuesong/ISB-8043-2023; Liang, Kang/GLQ-5335-2022; Emmett,
   Bryan/AAA-5265-2022; Qi, Junyu/Q-3939-2019
OI Venterea, Rodney/0000-0002-9003-2318; Emmett, Bryan/0000-0002-1121-3613;
   , Robert/0000-0001-5498-3864; Zhang, Xuesong/0000-0003-4711-7751; Liang,
   Kang/0000-0002-8979-813X
FU U.S. Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service; USDA;
   NASA [NNH13ZDA001N, NNX17AE66G, 18-CMS18-0052, 22-CMS22-0027]
FX The authors greatly appreciate the comments from the anonymous
   reviewers, which helped improve the quality of this paper. This research
   is in part supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
   Agricultural Research Service. This research is a contribution from the
   Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network. LTAR is supported by
   the USDA. The development of the SWAT-C model was also supported by NASA
   (NNH13ZDA001N, NNX17AE66G, 18-CMS18-0052, and 22-CMS22-0027) Mention of
   trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the
   purpose of providing specific information and does not imply
   recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. We
   extend our gratitude to Christopher Clark of the U.S. Environmental
   Protection Agency for his valuable feedback and insightful comments,
   which greatly contributed to the improvement of this manuscript.
CR Abdalla M, 2020, ENVIRON POLLUT, V262, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114199
   Arnold JG, 2015, T ASABE, V58, P1637
   Arnold J.G., 2013, SWAT 2012 Input/Output Documentation
   Arnold JG, 1998, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V34, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
   Aryal B, 2022, ENVIRON POLLUT, V314, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120272
   Bateman EJ, 2005, BIOL FERT SOILS, V41, P379, DOI 10.1007/s00374-005-0858-3
   Benckiser G, 2015, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V35, P1059, DOI 10.1007/s13593-015-0296-z
   Bessou C, 2010, EUR J SOIL SCI, V61, P348, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01243.x
   Bouwman AF, 2002, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V16, DOI [10.1029/2001GB001812, 10.1029/2001GB001811]
   Butterbach-Bahl K, 2013, PHILOS T R SOC B, V368, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2013.0122
   Cai YJ, 2012, GEODERMA, V181, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.03.005
   Chatskikh D, 2005, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V76, P395, DOI 10.1007/s10533-005-6996-8
   Chirinda N, 2011, PLANT SOIL, V343, P139, DOI 10.1007/s11104-010-0596-7
   Clough TJ, 2003, AUST J SOIL RES, V41, P439, DOI 10.1071/SR02079
   Conrad R, 1996, MICROBIOL REV, V60, P609, DOI 10.1128/MMBR.60.4.609-640.1996
   Cui XQ, 2021, NAT FOOD, V2, P886, DOI 10.1038/s43016-021-00384-9
   Decock C, 2014, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V48, P4247, DOI 10.1021/es4055324
   Del Grosso SJ, 2001, MODELING CARBON AND NITROGEN DYNAMICS FOR SOIL MANAGEMENT, P303
   Dobbie KE, 2001, EUR J SOIL SCI, V52, P667, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.00395.x
   Du XZ, 2019, ENVIRON POLLUT, V249, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.014
   Duan QY, 2007, ADV WATER RESOUR, V30, P1371, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.11.014
   Dueri S, 2023, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V340, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109619
   Ehrhardt F, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, pE603, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13965
   Fang QX, 2015, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V72, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.06.005
   Friedl J, 2016, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V92, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.09.016
   Fu CS, 2018, WATER RESOUR RES, V54, P3632, DOI 10.1029/2017WR022108
   Gao X, 2019, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V115, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.02.008
   Ghimire U, 2020, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/atmos11050450
   Gillette K, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V618, P982, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.054
   Grant RF, 2020, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V17, P2021, DOI 10.5194/bg-17-2021-2020
   Griffis TJ, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P12081, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1704552114
   Groffman PM, 2009, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V93, P49, DOI 10.1007/s10533-008-9277-5
   Gu JX, 2011, ENVIRON POLLUT, V159, P3149, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.04.009
   Gupta HV, 1999, J HYDROL ENG, V4, P135, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:2(135)
   Havlin JL., 2016, SOIL FERTILITY FERTI, V8th
   Hergoualc'h K., 2019, N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application
   Jacobsen B. H., 1998, An Integrated Economic and Environmental Farm Simulation Model (FASSET)
   Johnson JMF, 2012, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V76, P1347, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2012.0017
   KHALIL MAK, 1992, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V97, P14651, DOI 10.1029/92JD01222
   Kim Y, 2014, ECOL RES, V29, P441, DOI 10.1007/s11284-014-1136-3
   Lawrence NC, 2021, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V118, DOI [10.1073/pnas.2112108118j1of8, 10.1073/pnas.2112108118]
   Lee S, 2020, J HYDROL, V582, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124544
   Legates DR, 1999, WATER RESOUR RES, V35, P233, DOI 10.1029/1998WR900018
   Lesschen JP, 2011, ENVIRON POLLUT, V159, P3215, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.04.001
   Li CS, 2000, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V105, P4369, DOI 10.1029/1999JD900949
   LI CS, 1992, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V97, P9759, DOI 10.1029/92JD00509
   Li Y, 2005, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V19, DOI 10.1029/2004GB002392
   Li Y, 2007, ECOL MODEL, V203, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.011
   Liang D, 2021, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V27, P5599, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15833
   Liang K, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V879, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162906
   Liang K, 2022, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V158, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105553
   Liang K, 2019, FIELD CROP RES, V242, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107603
   Ma L, 2015, BIOL FERT SOILS, V51, P563, DOI 10.1007/s00374-015-1001-8
   Ma MN, 2022, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V14, DOI 10.1029/2021MS002460
   Maharjan B, 2013, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V66, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.07.015
   Mehnaz KR, 2018, BIOL FERT SOILS, V54, P481, DOI 10.1007/s00374-018-1274-9
   Molina-Herrera S, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V553, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.099
   Moriasi DN, 2007, T ASABE, V50, P885, DOI 10.13031/2013.23153
   Myhre G., 2014, ANTHROPOGENIC NATURA, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018
   Myrgiotis V, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V84, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.002
   Nash JE., 1970, Journal of Hydrology, V10, P282, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6]
   NASS, 2021, Quick Stats: USDAcash rents
   Neitsch S, 2011, SOIL WATER ASSESSMEN
   O'Brien PL, 2022, J ENVIRON QUAL, V51, P683, DOI 10.1002/jeq2.20361
   Olesen JE, 2002, FIELD CROP RES, V74, P131, DOI 10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00204-0
   Padilla FM, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V643, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.215
   Parkin TB, 2014, AGRON J, V106, P694, DOI 10.2134/agronj2013.0219
   Parton WJ, 1998, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V19, P35, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8181(98)00040-X
   Parton WJ, 2001, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V106, P17403, DOI 10.1029/2001JD900101
   PARTON WJ, 1994, SSSA SPEC PUBL, P147
   Parton WJ, 1996, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V10, P401, DOI 10.1029/96GB01455
   Pelster DE, 2012, J ENVIRON QUAL, V41, P427, DOI 10.2134/jeq2011.0261
   Portmann RW, 2012, PHILOS T R SOC B, V367, P1256, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2011.0377
   Portmann RW, 2007, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V34, DOI 10.1029/2006GL028252
   Qi J., 2020, Modeling Riverine Dissolved and Particulate Organic Carbon Fluxes from Two Small Watersheds in the Northeastern United States, V124
   Qi JY, 2020, J HYDROL, V584, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124601
   Quick AM, 2019, EARTH-SCI REV, V191, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.02.021
   Raftery AE, 2005, MON WEATHER REV, V133, P1155, DOI 10.1175/MWR2906.1
   Ravishankara AR, 2009, SCIENCE, V326, P123, DOI 10.1126/science.1176985
   Robertson G. P., 2015, Long-term Ecological Research at the Kellogg Biological Station LTER Site, the Ecology of Agricultural Landscapes: Long-Term Research on the Path to Sustainability, P1
   Rochester IJ, 2003, AUST J SOIL RES, V41, P197, DOI 10.1071/SR02068
   Rousk J, 2010, ISME J, V4, P1340, DOI 10.1038/ismej.2010.58
   Ruangcharus C, 2021, ENVIRON POLLUT, V279, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116892
   Saggar S, 2013, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V465, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.050
   Schwalm CR, 2010, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V115, DOI 10.1029/2009JG001229
   Shcherbak I, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P9199, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1322434111
   Shrestha NK, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V25, P27362, DOI 10.1007/s11356-018-2719-2
   Shrestha NK, 2018, ENVIRON POLLUT, V239, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.068
   Signor Diana, 2013, Pesqui. Agropecu. Trop., V43, P322, DOI 10.1590/S1983-40632013000300014
   Simek M, 2002, EUR J SOIL SCI, V53, P345, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2002.00461.x
   Smith P., 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007
   Souza EFC, 2021, ENVIRON POLLUT, V284, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117124
   Srinivasan R, 2010, T ASABE, V53, P1533
   Teepe R, 2001, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V33, P1269, DOI 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00084-0
   Thomas BW, 2017, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V81, P189, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2016.08.0269
   Tian HQ, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P1311, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.009
   Tilman D, 2002, NATURE, V418, P671, DOI 10.1038/nature01014
   United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2021, Smart Location Database
   Venterea RT, 2020, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V142, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107727
   Venterea RT, 2016, J ENVIRON QUAL, V45, P1186, DOI 10.2134/jeq2016.01.0024
   Venterea RT, 2010, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V74, P407, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2009.0078
   Wagena MB, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V89, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.11.013
   Wang C, 2021, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/agronomy11040770
   WEIER KL, 1993, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V57, P66, DOI 10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700010013x
   Whitaker J, 2018, GCB BIOENERGY, V10, P150, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12488
   Wilts HDM, 2022, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V233, DOI 10.1007/s11270-022-05945-7
   Yang QC, 2017, ECOSYST HEALTH SUST, V3, DOI 10.1002/ehs2.1259
   Yates TT, 2006, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V70, P753, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2005.0214
   Yen H, 2015, INT J AGR BIOL ENG, V8, P54, DOI 10.3965/j.ijabe.20150803.833
   Yen H, 2014, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V54, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.01.004
   Zhang HL, 2021, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V120, P363, DOI 10.1007/s10705-021-10155-4
   Zhang X, 2022, SWAT-carbon Manual
   Zhang XS, 2018, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V102, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.01.005
   Zhang XS, 2013, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V463, P810, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.056
   Zhang XS, 2013, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V46, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.03.013
   Zhang XS, 2011, J HYDROL, V409, P696, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.09.002
   Zhang XS, 2009, J HYDROL, V374, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.023
   Zou JW, 2010, ENVIRON POLLUT, V158, P631, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.08.026
NR 118
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 7
U2 18
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0269-7491
EI 1873-6424
J9 ENVIRON POLLUT
JI Environ. Pollut.
PD NOV 15
PY 2023
VL 337
AR 122537
DI 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122537
EA SEP 2023
PG 11
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA EH3G3
UT WOS:001137985400001
PM 37709120
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Trentinaglia, MT
   Baldi, L
   Peri, M
AF Trentinaglia, Maria Teresa
   Baldi, Lucia
   Peri, Massimo
TI Supporting agriculture in developing countries: new insights on the
   impact of official development assistance using a climate perspective
SO AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD ECONOMICS
LA English
DT Article
DE Official development assistance; Total factor productivity; Developing
   countries; Rio climate markers; ND-GAIN; Climate adaptation
ID SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; FOREIGN-AID; POVERTY REDUCTION; FOOD-PRICES;
   PRODUCTIVITY; GROWTH; REMITTANCES; GOVERNANCE; MIGRATION; TRANSFORMATION
AB Agriculture is a major source of food and income for poor and rural households living in developing countries; yet, agricultural systems are increasingly threatened by changing climate conditions that compromise their productivity and resilience. Over time, international aid has provided support to the agricultural systems of recipient countries, though the literature is not unanimous in confirming their effectiveness.To shed light on this issue, the purpose of this work is to assess the efficacy of these aid in increasing the agricultural productivity of recipient nations, employing original approaches.First, to adopt a climate change perspective, we conduct our analysis using a recent classification adopted by the Official Development Assistance-the Rio Markers-which distinguishes aid between adaptation and mitigation to climate change.Second, taking into account that the starting conditions of recipient countries can significantly impact aid effectiveness, we classify 115 developing countries into four subgroups according to their vulnerability and readiness to climate change, as evaluated by the ND-Gain indicators.We perform a two-stage instrumental variable approach within the context of panel models to investigate the potential growth-enhancing impact that different types of agricultural aid may exert on the agriculture Total Factor Productivity in recipient countries.Our findings show that aid to agriculture, especially adaptation aid, has a positive impact on agricultural productivity growth. We also observe that countries with a higher climate readiness benefit the most from aid, whereas countries highly vulnerable and heavily dependent on the agricultural sector are less able to leverage the aid received to the same extent.Overall, our analysis confirms the importance of international aid to the agricultural sector and suggests that accurate impact assessment analyses should also consider a climate perspective to distinguish adaptation from mitigation aid.
C1 [Trentinaglia, Maria Teresa; Baldi, Lucia; Peri, Massimo] Univ Milan, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Via G Celoria 2, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
C3 University of Milan
RP Baldi, L (corresponding author), Univ Milan, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Via G Celoria 2, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
EM lucia.baldi@unimi.it
RI Baldi, Lucia/ABE-5562-2021
OI BALDI, LUCIA/0000-0002-2791-9127
FU We would like to express our gratitude to the Editor and the anonymous
   reviewers for providing constructive and valuable suggestions that have
   significantly improved the quality of this work. The authors would also
   like to thank the participants to the 17t
FX We would like to express our gratitude to the Editor and the anonymous
   reviewers for providing constructive and valuable suggestions that have
   significantly improved the quality of this work. The authors would also
   like to thank the participants to the 17th Igls Forum and to the LVIII
   SIDEA annual conference. We also extend our thanks to Professor D.
   Cavicchioli for offering helpful insights during the paper & apos;s
   revision phase.
CR Adzawla W, 2021, AGR FOOD ECON, V9, DOI 10.1186/s40100-021-00183-7
   Alabi R. A., 2014, INT FOOD POLICY RES, V6
   Amuedo-Dorantes C, 2006, AM ECON REV, V96, P222, DOI 10.1257/000282806777211946
   Arndt C., 2010, J GLOBALIZATION DEV, V2, DOI DOI 10.2202/1948-1837.1121
   Baliamoune-Lutz M, 2009, REV DEV ECON, V13, P510, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2009.00504.x
   Barkat K, 2019, S AFR J ECON, V87, P354, DOI 10.1111/saje.12224
   Benfica R, 2017, FOOD SECUR, V9, P1405, DOI 10.1007/s12571-017-0731-x
   Burnside C, 2000, AM ECON REV, V90, P847, DOI 10.1257/aer.90.4.847
   Cabral L, 2012, 72 ODI, V72
   Chavas JP, 2019, EUR REV AGRIC ECON, V46, P29, DOI 10.1093/erae/jby019
   Chen C., 2015, Country Index Technical Report
   Chen SA, 2016, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V76, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2015.01.005
   CHRISTENSEN LR, 1975, AM J AGR ECON, V57, P910, DOI 10.2307/1239102
   Christiaensen L, 2018, WORLD DEV, V109, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.027
   Christiaensen L, 2011, J DEV ECON, V96, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.10.006
   Christian Paul., 2017, WORLD BANK POLICY RE
   Combes JL, 2014, WORLD DEV, V54, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.07.011
   Dalgaard CJ, 2004, ECON J, V114, pF191, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00219.x
   Denizer C, 2013, J DEV ECON, V105, P288, DOI 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.06.003
   Dethier JJ, 2012, ECON SYST, V36, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.ecosys.2011.09.003
   Dreher A, 2021, AM ECON J-ECON POLIC, V13, P135, DOI 10.1257/pol.20180631
   Dreher A, 2020, CAN J ECON, V53, P1162, DOI 10.1111/caje.12455
   FAO, 2018, Transforming food and agriculture to achieve the SDGs: 20 interconnected actions to guide decision-makers, technical reference document
   Fisher M, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V133, P283, DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1459-2
   Gáfaro M, 2022, J INT ECON, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.jinteco.2022.103598
   Galiani S, 2017, J ECON GROWTH, V22, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10887-016-9137-4
   Gil JM, 2009, APPL ECON, V41, P105, DOI 10.1080/00036840701604420
   Grace K, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V35, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.010
   Halimanjaya A, 2015, CLIM POLICY, V15, P223, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2014.912978
   Hassine NB, 2009, EUR REV AGRIC ECON, V36, P1, DOI 10.1093/erae/jbp002
   Hudson John., 2001, J INT DEV, V13, P1023, DOI 10.1002/jid.819
   Hynes W., 2013, The Evolution of Official Development Assistance: Achievements, Criticisms and a Way Forward?, DOI [10.1787/5k3v1dv3f024-en, DOI 10.1787/5K3V1DV3F024-EN]
   Iacobut GI, 2022, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102509
   International Labour Organization, 2021, ILO MOD EST DAT ILOS
   Irz X., 2001, Development Policy Review, V19, P449, DOI 10.1111/1467-7679.00144
   Ivanic M, 2008, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V39, P405, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00347.x
   Jain P, 2023, CLIM DEV, V15, P148, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2022.2065236
   Kargbo JM, 2007, APPL ECON, V39, P2211, DOI 10.1080/00036840600735374
   Kaya O, 2013, J AGR ECON, V64, P583, DOI 10.1111/1477-9552.12023
   Kornher L, 2021, AID NUTR LINK CAN TA
   Lio MC, 2009, J AGR ECON, V60, P40, DOI 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2008.00172.x
   Lio M, 2008, FOOD POLICY, V33, P504, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.06.003
   Makate C, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V231, P858, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.069
   Maruta AA, 2020, ECON MODEL, V89, P444, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2019.11.008
   Mary S, 2020, WORLD DEV, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104951
   Mary S, 2020, WORLD DEV, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104713
   Mattoo A., 2020, 9283 WORLD BANK
   Mbow HOP, 2017, CLIMATE CHANGE LAND
   Mendelsohn R., 2008, Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, V1, P5, DOI [DOI 10.1080/19390450802495882, 10.1080/19390450802495882]
   Mosley P, 2004, ECON J, V114, pF217, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00220.x
   NORTON GW, 1992, ECON DEV CULT CHANGE, V40, P775, DOI 10.1086/451976
   Nunn N, 2014, AM ECON REV, V104, P1630, DOI 10.1257/aer.104.6.1630
   OECD, 2016, RIO MARK CLIM HDB
   Petrikova I., 2015, International Journal of Development Issues, V14, P41, DOI 10.1108/IJDI-07-2014-0058
   Pingali P, 2007, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V37, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00231.x
   Pingali P, 2007, FOOD POLICY, V32, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.08.001
   Porkka M, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0082714
   Rajan RG, 2008, REV ECON STAT, V90, P643, DOI 10.1162/rest.90.4.643
   Ravallion M, 1996, WORLD BANK ECON REV, V10, P1, DOI 10.1093/wber/10.1.1
   Robertsen Jamie., 2015, Determinants of the Flow of Bilateral Adaptation-Related Climate Change Financing To Sub-Saharan African Countries
   Rozelle S, 1999, AM ECON REV, V89, P287, DOI 10.1257/aer.89.2.287
   Savvidou G, 2021, CLIM POLICY, V21, P1020, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2021.1978053
   Shumway CR, 2016, APPL ECON PERSPECT P, V38, P1, DOI 10.1093/aepp/ppv032
   Ssozi J, 2019, J ECON STUD, V46, P284, DOI 10.1108/JES-11-2017-0324
   Taylor JE, 2003, ECON DEV CULT CHANGE, V52, P75, DOI 10.1086/380135
   Thornton PK, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V52, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.06.003
   Tian JY, 2023, J AGR ECON, V74, P702, DOI 10.1111/1477-9552.12527
   Tiffin R, 2006, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V35, P79, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2006.00141.x
   Tóth J, 2020, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/agronomy10040612
   Warr P, 2014, AUST J AGR RESOUR EC, V58, P519, DOI 10.1111/1467-8489.12073
   Weiler F, 2018, WORLD DEV, V104, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.11.001
   Wodon Q, 2010, WORLD BANK RES OBSER, V25, P157, DOI 10.1093/wbro/lkp018
   Wonyra K.O., 2020, The Palgrave Handbook of Agricultural and Rural Development in Africa, P67, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-41513-64, 10.1007/978-3-030-41513-6_4, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-41513-6_4]
   World Bank, 2007, World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development
   Zaveri E, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P10225, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1910719117
   ,, 2020, The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2020: transforming food systems for affordable healthy diets, DOI 10.4060/ca9692en
NR 76
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 7
U2 17
PU SPRINGERNATURE
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON, N1 9XW, ENGLAND
EI 2193-7532
J9 AGR FOOD ECON
JI Agric. Food Econ.
PD SEP 21
PY 2023
VL 11
IS 1
AR 39
DI 10.1186/s40100-023-00282-7
PG 23
WC Agricultural Economics & Policy; Economics
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Agriculture; Business & Economics
GA S4HE0
UT WOS:001070786000001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Semere, T
   Fjellheim, S
   Tsehaye, Y
   Westengen, OT
AF Semere, Tesfakiros
   Fjellheim, Siri
   Tsehaye, Yemane
   Westengen, Ola T.
TI Inventory of on-farm sorghum landrace diversity and climate adaptation
   in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia: implications for sorghum breeding and
   conservation
SO GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Sorghum landraces; Conservation; Inventory; Diversity
ID L. MOENCH GERMPLASM; IN-SITU; MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION; SOUTH WELO;
   GEOGRAPHICAL PATTERNS; GENETIC DIVERSITY; BICOLOR; SHEWA;
   CLASSIFICATION; MANAGEMENT
AB The study was conducted with the aim of inventorying and assessing the level of sorghum landraces richness, estimating the extent and patterns of phenotypic diversity, identifying race type, and predicting suitable areas of production using future climate scenarios in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Overall, 358 landraces from 125 independent farmers' fields in 20 districts belonging to four zones of Tigray were surveyed. Landraces richness, frequency of character states, and diversity levels were estimated via Margalef's, Menhinick's and Shannon-Weaver (H ') indices for each zone and altitude classes. Suitable areas for sorghum cultivation in the future were predicted using DIVA-GIS. Altogether, 140 distinctly named landraces were identified and collected. Southern zone has the highest richness (D-Mg = 10.74, D-Mn = 5.0) followed by central (D-Mg = 8.54, D-Mn = 3.80). The estimated H ' for the phenotypic character states ranged from 0.24 (seed form) to 0.95 (rachis branch length). Highest diversity estimate was found in northwest (H ' = 0.71) followed by central zone (H ' = 0.64). Respectively, H ' was 0.70, 0.68, and 0.61 in lowland, intermediate, and highland elevations. In general, lowlands of northwest, central, and southern zones are identified as potential sites for germplasm conservation and utilization. The races durra, bicolor, caudatum, and durra-bicolor were found with durra as the dominant race (79%). All the currently surveyed areas and many other sites in Tigray are predicted to be suitable for future sorghum production under the changing climate scenario. Copies of all the 358 sorghum landraces are deposited in the national gene bank for use in future sorghum breeding work. The wealth of sorghum landraces diversity could be used in sorghum improvement programs.
C1 [Semere, Tesfakiros] Mekelle Univ, Dept Biotechnol, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
   [Semere, Tesfakiros; Fjellheim, Siri] Norwegian Univ Life Sci NMBU, Dept Plant Sci IPV, As, Norway.
   [Tsehaye, Yemane] Mekelle Univ, Dept Dryland Crops & Hort Sci, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
   [Westengen, Ola T.] Norwegian Univ Life Sci NMBU, Dept Int Environm & Dev Studies Noragr, As, Norway.
C3 Mekelle University; Norwegian University of Life Sciences; Mekelle
   University; Norwegian University of Life Sciences
RP Westengen, OT (corresponding author), Norwegian Univ Life Sci NMBU, Dept Int Environm & Dev Studies Noragr, As, Norway.
EM ola.westengen@nmbu.no
OI Semere, Tesfakiros/0000-0001-5933-3991
FU Norwegian Embassy in Addis Ababa
FX This work was supported by the Norwegian Embassy in Addis Ababa through
   the institutional collaboration between Mekelle University and the
   Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
CR Abdi A, 2002, HEREDITAS, V137, P161, DOI 10.1034/j.1601-5223.2002.01604.x
   Adugna A, 2014, SPRINGERPLUS, V3, DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-212
   Adugna A, 2013, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V60, P1313, DOI 10.1007/s10722-012-9921-8
   ALMEKINDERS CJM, 1994, EUPHYTICA, V78, P207, DOI 10.1007/BF00027519
   Amelework B., 2016, Australian Journal of Crop Science, V10, P291
   Asante S. A., 1995, African Crop Science Journal, V3, P231
   ASFAW Z, 1988, ACTA AGR SCAND, V38, P277, DOI 10.1080/00015128809437989
   Awika JM, 2004, PHYTOCHEMISTRY, V65, P1199, DOI 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.04.001
   Ayana A, 2000, HEREDITAS, V132, P249, DOI 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2000.t01-1-00249.x
   Ayana A, 1998, HEREDITAS, V129, P195, DOI 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1998.t01-1-00195.x
   Ayana A, 2000, EUPHYTICA, V115, P91, DOI 10.1023/A:1003998313302
   Beldados A., 2018, Plants and people: Progress in African archaeobotany, P503, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-89839-1_22, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-89839-1_22, 10.1007]
   Billot C, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059714
   Bishaw Z, 2008, EUPHYTICA, V163, P31, DOI 10.1007/s10681-007-9572-6
   Brhane G., 1981, ETH J AGR SCI, V3, P97
   Brown PJ, 2011, CROP SCI, V51, P224, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2010.03.0179
   Cuevas HE, 2017, BMC GENOMICS, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-3475-7
   Cuevas HE, 2013, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V60, P1817, DOI 10.1007/s10722-013-9956-5
   Desmae H., 2016, African Journal of Agricultural Research, V11, P3111
   Deu M, 2008, THEOR APPL GENET, V116, P903, DOI 10.1007/s00122-008-0721-7
   Dillon SL, 2007, ANN BOT-LONDON, V100, P975, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcm192
   Doggett H., 1991, Plant genetic resources of Ethiopia., P140, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511551543.011
   Doggett H., 1988, Tropical Agricultural Series, Vsecond
   Engels J.M.M., 1991, Plant Genetic Resources of Ethiopia, P23
   Faostat, 2017, US
   Fuller D.Q., 2018, Plants and People in the African Past: Progress in African Archaeobotany, P427, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-89839-1_19
   Geleta N, 2005, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V14, P3055, DOI 10.1007/s10531-004-0315-x
   Gerrano AS, 2014, SCI AGR, V71, P472, DOI 10.1590/0103-9016-2013-0322
   Girma G, 2019, FRONT PLANT SCI, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2019.00691
   HARLAN J R, 1975, Journal of Heredity, V66, P182
   Harlan J.R., 1976, ORIGINS AFRICAN PLAN, DOI [10.1515/9783110806373, DOI 10.1515/9783110806373]
   HARLAN JR, 1972, CROP SCI, V12, P172, DOI 10.2135/cropsci1972.0011183X001200020005x
   Harris H.B., 1970, Agron. J, V65, P957, DOI [DOI 10.2134/AGRONJ1973.00021962006500060033X, 10.2134/agronj1973.00021962006500060033x]
   Hijmans R. J., 2001, Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter, P15
   Hijmans RJ., 2012, DIVA-GIS Version 7.5
   HUTCHESON K, 1970, J THEOR BIOL, V29, P151, DOI 10.1016/0022-5193(70)90124-4
   IBPGR, 1993, DESCR SORGH SORG BIC
   Kebebew F, 2001, J AGR SCI, V136, P383, DOI 10.1017/S0021859601008887
   Magurran A.E., 1988, Ecological diversity and its measurement, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0
   Mansuetus A. S. B., 1990, Research & Training Newsletter (Dar es Salaam), V5, P18
   Mekbib F, 2007, J ETHNOBIOL ETHNOMED, V3, DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-3-38
   Morris GP, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P453, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1215985110
   Nadeem MA, 2018, BIOTECHNOL BIOTEC EQ, V32, P261, DOI 10.1080/13102818.2017.1400401
   NEGASSA M, 1985, HEREDITAS, V102, P139, DOI 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1985.tb00474.x
   Patil J.V., 2016, Millets and Sorghum: Biology and Genetic Improvement
   Perales HR, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P949, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0408701102
   Seboka B, 2006, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V53, P1385, DOI 10.1007/s10722-005-5676-9
   STEMLER ABL, 1977, ECON BOT, V31, P446, DOI 10.1007/BF02912558
   Teshome A, 1999, ECON BOT, V53, P79, DOI 10.1007/BF02860796
   Teshome A, 1997, EUPHYTICA, V97, P255, DOI 10.1023/A:1003074008785
   Teshome A, 1996, THESIS CARLETON U OT
   Teshome A, 2007, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V54, P1219, DOI 10.1007/s10722-006-9103-7
   Tesso T, 2008, CROP SCI, V48, P1425, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2007.08.0441
   Tesso T, 2011, HEREDITAS, V148, P98, DOI 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2011.02229.x
   Tsehaye Y, 2006, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V15, P4289, DOI 10.1007/s10531-005-3581-3
   Tsehaye Y, 2009, MOMONA ETHIOP J SCI, V1, P67, DOI 10.4314/mejs.v1i2.46049
   Tunstall V, 2001, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V48, P131, DOI 10.1023/A:1011233217447
   Vavilov N.I., 1951, ORIGIN VARIATION IMM, DOI DOI 10.1097/00010694-195112000-00018
   Venkateswaran K., 2019, Breeding Sorghum for Diverse End Uses, P15, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-101879-8.00002-4
   WARHAM EJ, 1988, CAN J PLANT PATHOL, V10, P57, DOI 10.1080/07060668809501765
   Westengen OT, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P14100, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1401646111
   Winchell F, 2018, AFR ARCHAEOL REV, V35, P483, DOI 10.1007/s10437-018-9314-2
   Worede M., 1993, CULTIVATING KNOWLEDG
   Yilma Kebede Yilma Kebede, 1991, Plant genetic resources of Ethiopia., P315, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511551543.026
   Zeven AC, 1996, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V43, P337, DOI 10.1007/BF00132953
NR 65
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 2
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 0925-9864
EI 1573-5109
J9 GENET RESOUR CROP EV
JI Genet. Resour. Crop Evol.
PD DEC
PY 2023
VL 70
IS 8
BP 2755
EP 2772
DI 10.1007/s10722-023-01604-w
EA MAY 2023
PG 18
WC Agronomy; Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Plant Sciences
GA T3BN9
UT WOS:000996918200001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Arellano, B
   Roca, J
AF Arellano, B.
   Roca, J.
BE Jiang, J
   Shaker, A
   Zhang, H
TI EFFECTS OF URBAN GREENERY ON HEALTH. A STUDY FROM REMOTE SENSING
SO XXIV ISPRS CONGRESS: IMAGING TODAY, FORESEEING TOMORROW, COMMISSION III
SE International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial
   Information Sciences
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT 24th ISPRS Congress on Imaging Today, Foreseeing Tomorrow
CY JUN 06-11, 2022
CL Nice, FRANCE
SP Int Soc Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing
DE Urban Greenery; Nighttime Urban Heat Island; LST; Health; Landsat 8;
   Sentinel 2; Metropolitan Area of Barcelona
ID HEAT WAVES
AB Global warming is causing increasing Heat Waves that affect human health. High temperatures markedly increase morbidity and mortality. Urban Heat Islands increase the effects of Heat Waves and are a serious inconvenience to human health and comfort. Cities can substantially increase local temperatures and reduce temperature drop at night. During the night, the greater thermal inertia of the central areas reduces their cooling capacity. On the other hand, it is important to highlight that urban vegetation plays a key role in adapting cities to Global Warming and Urban Heat Island. Green areas have lower temperatures than the rest of land uses and generate a cooling effect that spreads to their surroundings creating a "cool island" effect. The main objective of this paper is to establish the nocturnal land surface temperature and land surface air temperature of Barcelona Metropolitan Area (35 municipalities, 636 km(2), 3.3 million inhabitants) in an episode of a nocturnal heatwave and to estimate its possible impact on health and mortality. Subsequently, nighttime temperatures are analysed in this extreme heat context to determine their spatial distribution and detect the urban landscapes that are most vulnerable to extreme night heat. Modelling of land surface temperature must reveal the elements that determine night Urban Heat Island and consequently identify actions that can be implemented at urban planning level to refresh the environment during the night and thus increase the resilience of the most vulnerable landscapes and improve residents' health. This paper studies the effect of urban greenery and green infrastructures on Nighttime Urban Heat Island and propose climate adaptation measures and design for urban green areas to decrease high temperature in a Heat Wave context, which contributes to reducing the serious negative impacts on people's health.
C1 [Arellano, B.; Roca, J.] Tech Univ Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
C3 Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya
RP Roca, J (corresponding author), Tech Univ Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
EM blanca.arellano@upc.edu; josep.roca@upc.edu
RI , Josep/U-2243-2019; Arellano, Blanca/I-7710-2016
OI Roca, Josep/0000-0003-3970-6505
FU Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain
FX The study is part of the project "Extreme Spatial and Urban Planning
   Tool for Episodes of Heat Waves and Flash Floods. Building resilience
   for cities and regions", supported by the Ministry of Science and
   Innovation of Spain. The authors also thank the Barcelona Public Health
   Agency for the information provided on daily mortality in the city.
CR [Anonymous], 2014, Human thermal environments: The effects of hot, moderate, andcold environments on human health,comfort, and performance
   [Anonymous], 2022, Statistics Explained
   Arellano B., 2021, Inform. Sci., VXLIII-B3-2021, P15, DOI [10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-15-2021, DOI 10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLIII-B3-2021-15-2021]
   Arellano Blanca, 2021, PROC SPIE, VII, P11888
   Benali A, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V124, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2012.04.024
   Bowler DE, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V97, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
   Gasparrini A, 2015, LANCET, V386, P369, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62114-0
   Guzinski R, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12091433
   Intergov Panel Clim Chg, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139177245
   Kuttler W., 2012, Human and Social Dimensions Change, DOI [10.5772/50867, DOI 10.5772/50867]
   Mahour M, 2017, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V126, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.02.004
   Masson-Delmotte V., 2021, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, P41
   Meehl GA, 2004, SCIENCE, V305, P994, DOI 10.1126/science.1098704
   Mendelsohn R, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V81, P71, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9139-x
   OKE TR, 1973, ATMOS ENVIRON, V7, P769, DOI 10.1016/0004-6981(73)90140-6
   Royé D, 2017, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V61, P2127, DOI 10.1007/s00484-017-1416-z
   Serra C, 2020, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V139, P473, DOI 10.1007/s00704-019-02973-y
   Sobrino JA, 2008, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V46, P316, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2007.904834
   Spronken-Smith RA, 1998, INT J REMOTE SENS, V19, P2085, DOI 10.1080/014311698214884
   Tan JG, 2010, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V54, P75, DOI 10.1007/s00484-009-0256-x
NR 20
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 2
U2 14
PU COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
PI GOTTINGEN
PA BAHNHOFSALLE 1E, GOTTINGEN, 37081, GERMANY
SN 1682-1750
EI 2194-9034
J9 INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM
PY 2022
VL 43-B3
BP 17
EP 24
DI 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-17-2022
PG 8
WC Geography, Physical; Remote Sensing; Imaging Science & Photographic
   Technology
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Physical Geography; Remote Sensing; Imaging Science & Photographic
   Technology
GA BT8VW
UT WOS:000855647800002
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Longui, EL
   Caum, C
   Tomazello, M
   Lisi, CS
   Roig, FA
   Marcati, CR
AF Longui, Eduardo Luiz
   Caum, Caroline
   Tomazello-Filho, Mario
   Lisi, Claudio Sergio
   Roig, Fidel Alejandro
   Marcati, Carmen Regina
TI Anatomical and tree rings differences in two provenances of <i>Cordia
   trichotoma</i> (Vell.) Arrab. ex Steud. (Boraginaceae)
SO SCIENTIA FORESTALIS
LA English
DT Article
DE Heritability; Louro-pardo; Rainfall; Temperature; Wood features
ID ANNUAL GROWTH RINGS; ECOLOGICAL TRENDS; WOOD ANATOMY;
   ARAUCARIA-ANGUSTIFOLIA; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; AXIAL PARENCHYMA;
   TECTONA-GRANDIS; VESSEL DIAMETER; FOREST; XYLEM
AB The parental effect on wood anatomy and growth rings of Cordia trichotoma trees was studied. Tree seeds of two provenances (Cerrado and Atlantic Forest biomes) were collected in 1986. Seedlings were planted, and after 25 years, twelve wood disks were collected from six trees from each provenance. Anatomical features and growth rings were analyzed according to standard techniques. Qualitative anatomy of wood indicated similarities between the two provenances, except for the presence of geniculate vessels found in woods from the Cerrado. However, the greatest differences in wood anatomy were quantitative. Provenances from Cerrado had wood with shorter vessel and fibers elements, less fiber lumen, less parenchyma per mm 2 , and more vessels per group than did provenances from the Atlantic Forest. Cross dating among the radial growth ring series was performed through visual and statistical procedures. The relationships between tree rings and meteorological records were performed through Pearson's correlation, and through dendro-climatic analysis that identified the end summer precipitation as the major factor affecting tree growth at inter annual timescale. The standard chronologies of tree-ring width series showed similarity between Cerrado and Atlantic Forest provenances, but with small differences in the juvenile period of live of trees. The rains that decreased between April and June associated with the gradual decrease in temperature may have reduced the cambial activity and caused the formation of tree rings with small differences between the two provenances. The results of this study are relevant for climate adaptive forestry: they emphasize the importance of heritability in the plasticity of certain features of wood anatomy related to the environmental conditions in which they grow, while the growth rate and its year-by-year variability show small differences.
C1 [Longui, Eduardo Luiz] Inst Pesquisas Ambientais, Ctr Inovacao Tecnol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
   [Caum, Caroline; Marcati, Carmen Regina] Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Fac Ciencias Agron, Dept Ciencia Florestal, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
   [Tomazello-Filho, Mario] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Ciencias Florestais, Escola Super Agr Luiz de Queiroz, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
   [Lisi, Claudio Sergio] Univ Fed Sergipe, Ctr Ciencias Biol & Saude, Dept Biol, Sao Cristovao, SE, Brazil.
   [Roig, Fidel Alejandro] Univ Nacl Cuyo, Lab Dendrocronol & Hist Ambiental, Inst Argentino Nivol Glaciol & Ciencias Ambiental, CONICET, Mendoza, Argentina.
   [Roig, Fidel Alejandro] Univ Mayor, Fac Ciencias, Escuela Ingn Forestal, Hemera Ctr Observac Tierra, Santiago, Chile.
C3 Universidade Estadual Paulista; Universidade de Sao Paulo; Universidade
   Federal de Sergipe; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y
   Tecnicas (CONICET); University Nacional Cuyo Mendoza; Universidad Mayor
RP Longui, EL (corresponding author), Inst Pesquisas Ambientais, Ctr Inovacao Tecnol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
EM elongui@sp.gov.br
RI Tomazello-Filho, Mario/ABD-8077-2020; Longui, Eduardo/D-3680-2015;
   Marcati, Carmen/C-6490-2012
OI Marcati, Carmen/0000-0001-5723-6450
FU Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - CAPES
   (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel);
   Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq
   (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development)
   [302549/2012-9]
FX This research was funded by Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de
   Nivel Superior - CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher
   Education Personnel) for a grant to Caroline Caum (Master Degree).
   Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq
   (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) for a
   grant to Eduardo Luiz Longui (302549/2012-9).
CR Giantomasi MA, 2015, DENDROCHRONOLOGIA, V35, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.dendro.2015.07.002
   Alves ES, 2000, IAWA J, V21, P3, DOI 10.1163/22941932-90000233
   Alves ES, 2002, IAWA J, V23, P391
   ANA, 2020, SIST INF HIDR
   [Anonymous], 1998, ARVORES BRASILEIRAS
   [Anonymous], 1999, VEGETACAO PIRACICABA
   [Anonymous], 1960, KLIMADIAGRAMM WELTAT, DOI DOI 10.4236/OJMH.2013.34026
   [Anonymous], 1988, PROJETO MADEIRA RIO
   [Anonymous], 1997, Manual basico de metodos em morfologia vegetal
   [Anonymous], 2003, ESPECIES ARBOREAS BR
   BAAS P, 1983, IAWA BULL, V4, P141, DOI 10.1163/22941932-90000407
   Baas P., 2004, The evolution of plant physiology, P273, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012339552-8/50016-0
   Barros Claudia Franca, 2006, Rodriguésia, V57, P443, DOI 10.1590/2175-7860200657305
   BERLyN G. P, 1976, BOT MICROTECHNIQUE C
   Bhattacharyya A, 2009, IAWA J, V30, P361, DOI 10.1163/22941932-90000224
   Zanon MLB, 2010, CIENC FLOREST, V20, P467, DOI 10.5902/198050982061
   Botosso P. C., 1991, Revista do Instituto Florestal, V3, P163
   Briceño-J Ana María, 2016, Colomb. for., V19, P219, DOI 10.14483/udistrital.jour.colomb.for.2016.2.a07
   Brienen RJW, 2005, OECOLOGIA, V146, P1, DOI 10.1007/s00442-005-0160-y
   Brienen RJW, 2016, TREE PHYSIOL-NETH, V6, P439, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-27422-5_20
   Brienen RJW, 2009, BIOTROPICA, V41, P186, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00462.x
   Buckley BM, 1995, IAWA J, V16, P393, DOI 10.1163/22941932-90001429
   BUKATSCH F, 1972, Mikrokosmos, V61, P255
   Cahuana Leif Armando Portal, 2021, Floresta, V51, P703, DOI 10.5380/rf.v51i3.72410
   Callado Cátia Henriques, 2010, Braz. J. Bot., V33, P84, DOI 10.1590/S0100-84042010000100008
   CARLQUIST S, 1985, IAWA BULL, V6, P319, DOI 10.1163/22941932-90000960
   Carlquist S., 2001, COMP WOOD ANATOMY, V2nd, P448, DOI [10.1007/978-3-662-04578-7, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-04578-7]
   Carlquist S, 2015, BOT J LINN SOC, V177, P291, DOI 10.1111/boj.12247
   Cavassan O, 2006, Divulgacao cientifica e ensino de Ciencias: Estudos e experiencias, P190
   Tung ESC, 2010, SCI FOR, V38, P499
   Coradin V. T. R, 2000, THESIS U BRASILIA BR
   CORNELIUS J, 1994, CAN J FOREST RES, V24, P372, DOI 10.1139/x94-050
   Denardi Luciano, 2005, Ciênc. Florest., V15, P119, DOI 10.5902/198050981829
   DETIENNE P, 1989, IAWA BULL, V10, P123, DOI 10.1163/22941932-90000480
   Detienne P., 1977, BOIS FOR TROP, V175, P53, DOI DOI 10.19182/BFT1975.159.A19269
   Devall MS, 1995, IAWA J, V16, P411, DOI 10.1163/22941932-90001430
   Eilmann B, 2014, TREE PHYSIOL, V34, P882, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpu069
   Enquist BJ, 2001, J TROP ECOL, V17, P41, DOI 10.1017/S0266467401001031
   Ferreira L. E. T., 2002, THESIS
   Fontana Claudia, 2018, Neotropical Biology and Conservation, V13, P321, DOI 10.4013/nbc.2018.134.06
   Franco A.C., 2002, CERRADOS BRAZIL, P178, DOI DOI 10.7312/OLIV12042-009
   FRANKLIN GL, 1945, NATURE, V155, P51, DOI 10.1038/155051a0
   Freitas M. L. M., 2008, REV I FLORESTAL, V20, P165
   FRITTS HC, 1972, SCI AM, V226, P92, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican0572-92
   García-Cervigón AI, 2017, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V31, P1057, DOI 10.1007/s00468-017-1530-x
   Gurgel-Garrido L. M. A., 1997, IF SERIE REGISTROS, V18, P1
   Hacke UG, 2017, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V40, P831, DOI 10.1111/pce.12777
   Haridasan M., 2000, Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia Vegetal, V12, P54
   HAZLETT DL, 1989, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V28, P191, DOI 10.1016/0378-1127(89)90003-0
   HOLMES R L, 1983, Tree-Ring Bulletin, V43, P69
   Holmes R. L., 1986, TREE RING CHRONOLOGI, P15
   IAWA C., 1989, IAWA Bulletin, V10, P219
   Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia-INMET, 2017, EST MET SAO SIM SP
   Johansen DA., 1940, PLANT MICRO TECHNIQU
   Klaassen R., 1999, Wood Anatomy of the Sapindaceae
   Köse N, 2012, TURK J AGRIC FOR, V36, P501, DOI 10.3906/tar-1109-4
   Leon H. W. J., 2003, Revista Forestal Venezolana, V47, P83
   Lisi CS, 2008, IAWA J, V29, P189, DOI 10.1163/22941932-90000179
   Lobao M. S., 2011, THESIS U SAO PAULO P
   Luchi A.E., 1998, THESIS U SAO PAULO S
   Luchi Agnes E., 2004, Braz. J. Bot., V27, P271, DOI 10.1590/S0100-84042004000200007
   Luchi Agnes E., 2005, Revista Brasileira de Botanica, V28, P809, DOI 10.1590/S0100-84042005000400015
   Mantovani Nilton Cesar, 2001, Ciencia Florestal, V11, P93
   Marcati C.R., 2006, Biota Neotrop, V6, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1590/S1676-06032006000300001, 10.1590/S1676-06032006000300001]
   Marcati C. R., 2000, THESIS U SAO PAULO S
   Marcati Carmen Regina, 2001, Revista Brasileira de Botanica, V24, P311, DOI 10.1590/S0100-84042001000300010
   Matisons R, 2021, FORESTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/f12081101
   Mattos-Filho A., 1978, RODRIGUESIA, V47, P33
   Mattos-Filho A, 1971, RODRIGUESIA, V26, P9
   Montagnini F, 1997, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V99, P237, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00209-0
   Morris H, 2016, NEW PHYTOL, V209, P1553, DOI 10.1111/nph.13737
   Nicotra AB, 2010, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V15, P684, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.008
   Oliveira JM, 2010, AUSTRAL ECOL, V35, P134, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02018.x
   Pfautsch S, 2016, CURR FOR REP, V2, P236, DOI 10.1007/s40725-016-0046-8
   Pratt RB, 2007, NEW PHYTOL, V174, P787, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02061.x
   Prislan P, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.01923
   Pumijumnong N, 1995, IAWA J, V16, P385, DOI 10.1163/22941932-90001428
   Rao VB, 2002, J CLIMATE, V15, P502, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<0502:ADOROS>2.0.CO;2
   Rebollar S, 1994, Acta Botanica Mexicana, P89
   ROESER K R, 1972, Mikrokosmos, V61, P33
   Rosell JA, 2017, CURR FOR REP, V3, P46, DOI 10.1007/s40725-017-0049-0
   Rosell JA, 2014, PERSPECT PLANT ECOL, V16, P288, DOI 10.1016/j.ppees.2014.08.001
   Rozendaal DMA, 2011, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V25, P3, DOI 10.1007/s00468-010-0480-3
   Schöngart J, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P1139, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01154.x
   Schöngart J, 2017, ECOL STUD-ANAL SYNTH, V231, P35, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-61669-8_3
   Schöning M, 2004, J S AM EARTH SCI, V17, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.jsames.2004.05.007
   Schweingruber F. H., 1996, Tree rings and environment: dendroecology.
   Secchi F, 2011, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V34, P514, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02259.x
   Soliz-Gamboa CC, 2011, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V25, P17, DOI 10.1007/s00468-010-0468-z
   Speer J.H., 2011, FUNDAMENTALS TREE RI
   Stahle DW, 1999, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V124, P217, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00075-4
   Stapf M. N. S, 2017, LISTA ESPECIES FLORA
   Sultan SE, 2000, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V5, P537, DOI 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01797-0
   Tomazello_Filho M., 2001, PALAEOBOTANIST, V50, P47
   TSCHINKEL HM, 1966, TURRIALBA, V16, P73
   Tyree MT., 2002, SPR S WOOD, P284
   Ugulino B, 2014, SCI FOR, V42, P473
   Universidade de Sao Paulo-USP, 2020, SER DAD CLIM CAMP LU
   Worbes M, 1999, J ECOL, V87, P391, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00361.x
   WORBES M, 1989, IAWA BULL, V10, P109, DOI 10.1163/22941932-90000479
   Worbes Martin, 2002, Dendrochronologia, V20, P217, DOI 10.1078/1125-7865-00018
   YAMAMOTO F, 1995, IAWA J, V16, P47, DOI 10.1163/22941932-90001388
   Zanne AE, 2010, AM J BOT, V97, P207, DOI 10.3732/ajb.0900178
   Zheng JM, 2013, ANN BOT-LONDON, V112, P927, DOI 10.1093/aob/mct153
NR 104
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 17
PU IPEF-INST PESQUISAS ESTUDOS FLORESTAIS
PI PIRACICABA
PA PADUA DIAS AVE 11, PO BOX 530, PIRACICABA, SP 13400-970, BRAZIL
SN 1413-9324
J9 SCI FOR
JI Sci. For.
PY 2022
VL 50
AR e3765
DI 10.18671/scifor.v50.24
PG 16
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA 2W7KY
UT WOS:000824700500011
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Celliers, L
   Costa, MM
   Williams, DS
   Rosendo, S
AF Celliers, Louis
   Costa, Maria Manez
   Williams, David Samuel
   Rosendo, Sergio
TI The 'last mile' for climate data supporting local adaptation
SO GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; information hierarchy; local adaptation; social entropy
ID LIVING SYSTEMS-THEORY; SOCIAL ENTROPY; INFORMATION USABILITY; ACTIONABLE
   KNOWLEDGE; BARRIERS; SCIENCE; GOVERNMENT; FRAMEWORK; PROJECTIONS;
   GOVERNANCE
AB Non-technical summary The 'last mile' is a transportation planning term that describes the movement of people and goods from a transportation hub to a final destination; a local place such as a home or a shop. This is the final step of the logistics process that unites the product with its new owner. We present and explain challenges of science-guided adaptation at the local level, and how this is an equivalent 'last mile' challenge for climate adaptation. Technical summary The 'last mile' issue, a term used in transportation planning, describes the movement of people and goods from a transportation hub to a final destination, a local place such as a home or a shop. This is the critical final step of the logistics process that unites the product with its new owner, and the point of the value chain. This analogy aptly describes the last steps between presenting scientific evidence of climate change to decision-makers for use in local adaptation and planning. Climate change data (observational and model simulation data e.g. climate change projections and predictions) remain under-utilised, especially by local institutions and actors for which adaptation is a priority. The assumptions and assertions of the classical data-information-knowledge-wisdom are challenged, and a derivative form of the information hierarchy is proposed. Elements of the classical information hierarchy are offset by four balancing elements of access (to data); usability (of information); governance (of knowledge) and politics (of wisdom). These balancing elements and their relatedness coincide with newer models of innovation relating to the interaction between different stakeholders across the different levels of governance, the inclusion of stakeholder expectations, transparency and accountability. Social media summary Climate data to wise decision-making in the 'last mile': a novel perspective on science-guided local adaptation.
C1 [Celliers, Louis; Costa, Maria Manez; Williams, David Samuel] Helmholtz Zentrum Hereon, Climate Serv Ctr Germany Ger, Fischertwiete 1, D-20095 Hamburg, Germany.
   [Williams, David Samuel] Istanbul Policy Ctr, Bankalar Cad 2 Minerva Han, TR-34420 Istanbul, Turkey.
   [Rosendo, Sergio] Nova Univ Lisbon UNL, Fac Social Sci & Humanities FCSH, Interdisciplinary Ctr Social Sci CICS NOVA, Ave Berna 26-C, P-1069061 Lisbon, Portugal.
C3 Helmholtz Association; Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon; Ministry of Interior -
   Turkey; Universidade Nova de Lisboa
RP Celliers, L (corresponding author), Helmholtz Zentrum Hereon, Climate Serv Ctr Germany Ger, Fischertwiete 1, D-20095 Hamburg, Germany.
EM louis.celliers@hereon.de
RI Celliers, Louis/GRO-6282-2022; Rosendo, Sergio/J-3904-2013; Williams,
   David/ABD-7998-2020; Manez Costa, Maria/P-1225-2017
OI /0000-0002-1418-589X; Manez Costa, Maria/0000-0001-5415-0811; Rosendo,
   Sergio/0000-0002-3095-9824
FU Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association MASMA Programme
   [MASMA/OP/2013/01]; ERA-NET CoFund (ERA4CS) project INNOVA [690462]
FX Funding for this research in its very early conception was partially
   provided by the Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association MASMA
   Programme (Grant No. MASMA/OP/2013/01). The ERA-NET CoFund (ERA4CS)
   project INNOVA (Grant Agreement No. 690462) provided financial support
   in the final stages of the development.
CR Ackoff R. L., 1989, J APPL SYSTEMS ANAL, V16, P3, DOI DOI 10.5840/DU2005155/629
   Agrawala Shardul., 2005, Bridge over Troubled Waters: Linking Climate Change and Development, P133
   Araos M, 2017, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V19, P682, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1264873
   Arnott JC, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V42, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.006
   Aven T, 2013, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V111, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2012.09.014
   Aylett A, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.06.005
   Bai XM, 2018, NATURE, V555, P19, DOI 10.1038/d41586-018-02409-z
   Bailey KD, 2006, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V23, P291, DOI 10.1002/sres.728
   Bailey KD, 2008, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V25, P587, DOI 10.1002/sres.933
   Baker I, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V107, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.009
   BARROS VR, 2014, 5 ASSESSMENT REPORT, P1, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.00
   Bateman TS, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P1052, DOI 10.1038/nclimate3166
   Benestad Rasmus, 2017, Climate Services, V6, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2017.06.013
   Berbés-Blázquez M, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V141, P227, DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-1897-0
   Bidwell D, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P610, DOI 10.1038/nclimate1931
   Guy P, 2016, EARTHS FUTURE, V4, P79, DOI 10.1002/2015EF000338
   Bremer S, 2017, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V8, DOI 10.1002/wcc.482
   Bulkeley H, 2005, ENVIRON POLIT, V14, P42, DOI 10.1080/0964401042000310178
   Buontempo C, 2020, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V27, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2019.100226
   Buontempo C, 2018, CLIM SERV, V9, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2017.06.003
   Butler D, 2008, NATURE, V453, P840, DOI 10.1038/453840a
   Cabos W, 2019, CLIM DYNAM, V52, P4305, DOI 10.1007/s00382-018-4381-2
   Carlsson-Kanyama A, 2013, FUTURES, V49, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2013.02.008
   Carmona M, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P750, DOI 10.1002/2017EF000545
   Carter JG, 2015, PROG PLANN, V95, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2013.08.001
   Cheng CW, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V167, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.05.019
   Cole DH, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P114, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2490
   Colenbrander D, 2017, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V150, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.012
   Colglazier E.W., 2016, SCI DIPLOMACY, V5, P7
   Conway D, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P339, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2199
   Cortner H.J., 2000, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V3, P21
   Daron J, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V148, P187, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2183-5
   de Freitas DM, 2013, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V86, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.10.011
   Dessai S, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.004
   Dilling L, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P680, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006
   Frické M, 2009, J INF SCI, V35, P131, DOI 10.1177/0165551508094050
   FUNTOWICZ SO, 1993, FUTURES, V25, P739, DOI 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
   Giorgi F., 2009, Bulletin - World Meteorological Organization, V58, P175
   Giorgi F, 2015, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V40, P467, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021217
   Golding Nicola, 2017, Climate Services, V5, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2017.03.004
   Gorddard R, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V57, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.004
   Hackenbruch J, 2017, CLIMATE, V5, DOI 10.3390/cli5020025
   IPCC, 2018, GLOB WARM 1 5C SUMM
   Jones L, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P812, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2701
   Kalafatis SE, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V32, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.007
   Kirchhoff CJ, 2013, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V38, P393, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-022112-112828
   Kulin J, 2021, CLIM POLICY, V21, P33, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2020.1792822
   Lacey J, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P22, DOI 10.1038/s41558-017-0010-z
   Lacey J, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V32, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.011
   Lemos MC, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P789, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1614, 10.1038/nclimate1614]
   Lorenz S, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P425, DOI 10.1007/s10113-016-1030-3
   Mach KJ, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V42, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.002
   Mavrofides T, 2011, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V28, P353, DOI 10.1002/sres.1084
   Measham TG, 2011, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V16, P889, DOI 10.1007/s11027-011-9301-2
   Moser SC, 2014, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V5, P337, DOI 10.1002/wcc.276
   Moser SC, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P22026, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1007887107
   Nalau J, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V48, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.12.011
   Nordgren J, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P344, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.006
   Norstrom AV, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P182, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2
   Olazabal M, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V83, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.017
   Omar SA, 2017, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V128, P453, DOI 10.1007/s00704-015-1714-5
   Ordner JP, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P161
   Overpeck JT, 2011, SCIENCE, V331, P700, DOI 10.1126/science.1197869
   Paavola J, 2006, ECOL ECON, V56, P594, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.015
   Pasquini L, 2013, HABITAT INT, V40, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.05.003
   Pasquini L, 2015, CLIM DEV, V7, P60, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2014.886994
   Pasquini L, 2014, J ENVIRON DEV, V23, P271, DOI 10.1177/1070496514525406
   Porter JJ, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V35, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.10.004
   Prieur-Richard A-H., 2018, CITIES CLIMATE CHANG, P1, DOI DOI 10.3138/JCCPE-2022.1.1.0007
   Revi A, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P535
   Rölfer L, 2020, CLIM SERV, V18, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100168
   Rowley J, 1998, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V18, P359, DOI 10.1016/S0268-4012(98)00025-5
   Rowley J., 2006, Management Decision, V44, P1246, DOI 10.1108/00251740610707712
   Rowley J, 2007, J INF SCI, V33, P163, DOI 10.1177/0165551506070706
   Sanchez-Rodriguez R, 2009, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V1, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2009.10.005
   Schreurs M. A., 2008, Journal of Environment & Development, V17, P343, DOI 10.1177/1070496508326432
   Shepherd TG, 2019, P ROY SOC A-MATH PHY, V475, DOI 10.1098/rspa.2019.0013
   Shi LD, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P131, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2841
   Shukla P.R., 2019, Special Report on climate change and land
   Spiekermann R, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V13, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.05.002
   Stocker TF, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1, DOI 10.1017/cbo9781107415324
   Street R.B., 2016, Climate Services, V1, P2, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.CLISER.2015.12.001, 10.1016/j.cliser.2015.12, DOI 10.1016/J.CLISER.2015.12]
   Stults M, 2017, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V22, P1249, DOI 10.1007/s11027-016-9725-9
   Swanson GA, 1997, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V14, P45, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199701/02)14:1<45::AID-SRES151>3.0.CO;2-Y
   Swart R, 2014, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V2, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2014.00029
   Tribbia J, 2008, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V11, P315, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.01.003
   Tschakert P, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V40, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.004
   van der Voorn T, 2017, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V22, P519, DOI 10.1007/s11027-015-9686-4
   Vincent K, 2018, CLIM SERV, V12, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2018.11.001
   Vincent K, 2017, CLIM POLICY, V17, P189, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2015.1075374
   Weichselgartner J, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.006
   WEISS CH, 1979, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V39, P426, DOI 10.2307/3109916
   Williams C, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P82, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2476
   Zins C, 2007, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V58, P479, DOI 10.1002/asi.20508
NR 94
TC 13
Z9 14
U1 0
U2 10
PU CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
PI CAMBRIDGE
PA EDINBURGH BLDG, SHAFTESBURY RD, CB2 8RU CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND
EI 2059-4798
J9 GLOB SUSTAIN
JI Glob. Sustain.
PD APR 5
PY 2021
VL 4
AR e14
DI 10.1017/sus.2021.12
PG 8
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA WL6VQ
UT WOS:000710541300001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Vico, G
   Karacic, A
   Adler, A
   Richards, T
   Weih, M
AF Vico, Giulia
   Karacic, Almir
   Adler, Anneli
   Richards, Thomas
   Weih, Martin
TI Consistent Poplar Clone Ranking Based on Leaf Phenology and Temperature
   Along a Latitudinal and Climatic Gradient in Northern Europe
SO BIOENERGY RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Bioenergy; Biomass production; Populus; Leaf phenology; Climate
   adaptation; Northern Europe; Late frost
ID ASPEN POPULUS-TREMULA; SHORT-ROTATION FORESTRY; PHOTOSYNTHETIC CAPACITY;
   TREE PHENOLOGY; AUTUMN SENESCENCE; SPRING PHENOLOGY; GROWTH; MODELS;
   PERFORMANCE; DORMANCY
AB In Northern Europe, poplars (Populus) can provide biomass for energy and material use, but most available clones were developed for lower latitudes and are unlikely to be well adapted to higher latitudes, even under warmer climates. We thus need to understand how clones respond to climatic conditions and photoperiod, and how these responses can be predicted. We answer these questions exploiting leaf phenological data of Populus clones, grown in six sites across the Baltic region, in Northern Europe, for 2 years with contrasting climatic conditions. Regarding the effects of climatic conditions and photoperiod, within each site, higher temperatures advanced the timing and enhanced the speed of spring and autumn phenology, but reduced the effective growing season length. Across sites, latitude affected the timing of spring and autumn phenology, the speed of spring phenology, and the effective growing season length; clone affected only the timing of phenology. Regarding the predictability of clone response to growing conditions, the growing degree day (GDD) model could not predict spring phenology, because the growing degree day threshold for a specific phenological stage was not only clone-, but also latitude- and year-specific. Yet, this GDD threshold allowed a robust ranking of clones across sites and years, thus providing a tool to determine the relative differences across clones, independently of latitude and temperature. A similar, but not as strong, pattern was observed in the timing of spring and autumn phenological stages. Hence, while prediction of spring phenology remains elusive, the ranking of clones based on observations of their phenology in a single location can provide useful indications on the clones' relative performance under different latitudes and climates.
C1 [Vico, Giulia; Karacic, Almir; Adler, Anneli; Weih, Martin] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Crop Prod Ecol, Uppsala, Sweden.
   [Richards, Thomas] Uppsala Univ, Dept Ecol & Genet, Uppsala, Sweden.
C3 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Uppsala University
RP Vico, G (corresponding author), Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Crop Prod Ecol, Uppsala, Sweden.
EM giulia.vico@slu.se
RI richards, tom/L-2186-2019; Karacic, Almir/IWU-8380-2023; Weih,
   Martin/H-5093-2011; Vico, Giulia/A-6296-2010
OI Weih, Martin/0000-0003-3823-9183; Karacic, Almir/0000-0002-0180-812X;
   Richards, Thomas/0000-0001-5945-6545; Vico, Giulia/0000-0002-7849-2653;
   Adler, Anneli/0000-0001-7525-1224
FU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Swedish Research Council
   FORMAS, as part of the Climate Adapted Poplar (CLAP) project
   [942-2016-20001]; Swedish Research Council FORMAS [2018-01820]; Swedish
   University of Agriculture (SLU); Umea University; Skogforsk
FX Open Access funding provided by Swedish University of Agricultural
   Sciences. This project was supported by: - Swedish Research Council
   FORMAS, as part of the Climate Adapted Poplar (CLAP) project, under
   grant 942-2016-20001;- Swedish Research Council FORMAS, through grant
   2018-01820;- Trees and Crops for the Future (TC4F)-a co-operative
   project between established research environments at the Swedish
   University of Agriculture (SLU), Umea University and Skogforsk.
CR Allstadt AJ, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/104008
   Augspurger CK, 2013, ECOLOGY, V94, P41, DOI 10.1890/12-0200.1
   Basler D, 2016, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V217, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.11.007
   Basler D, 2012, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V165, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.06.001
   Bauerle WL, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P8612, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1119131109
   Bernacchi CJ, 2001, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V24, P253, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2001.00668.x
   Blümel K, 2012, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V164, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.05.001
   Cannell M.G. R., 1997, Weather, V52, P46, DOI DOI 10.1002/J.1477-8696.1997.TB06268.X
   CEULEMANS R, 1992, CAN J FOREST RES, V22, P1937, DOI 10.1139/x92-253
   Clark JS, 2014, FUNCT ECOL, V28, P1344, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12309
   Cooke JEK, 2012, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V35, P1707, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02552.x
   Dickmann DI, 2014, POPLARS AND WILLOWS: TREES FOR SOCIETY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, P8, DOI 10.1079/9781780641089.0008
   Elferjani R, 2016, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V125, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.01.007
   Estiarte M, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P1005, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12804
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Flynn DFB, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V219, P1353, DOI 10.1111/nph.15232
   Fracheboud Y, 2009, PLANT PHYSIOL, V149, P1982, DOI 10.1104/pp.108.133249
   Fu YSH, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P2410, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14633
   Givnish TJ, 2002, SILVA FENN, V36, P703, DOI 10.14214/sf.535
   Gleeson E, 2013, BIOL ENVIRON, V113B, P47, DOI 10.3318/BIOE.2013.06
   Gornall JL, 2007, CAN J BOT, V85, P1202, DOI 10.1139/B07-079
   Gunderson CA, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P2008, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02632.x
   HAYLOCK MR, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES, V113, DOI DOI 10.1029/2008JD010201
   HEIDE OM, 1993, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V88, P531, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1993.tb01368.x
   Henner DN, 2020, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105470
   Kaluthota S, 2015, TREE PHYSIOL, V35, P936, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpv069
   Karacic A, 2003, SCAND J FOREST RES, V18, P427, DOI 10.1080/02827580310009113
   Keenan TF, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P2634, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12890
   Keenan TF, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P598, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2253, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2253]
   KIKUZAWA K, 1995, CAN J BOT, V73, P158, DOI 10.1139/b95-019
   Körner C, 2016, J ECOL, V104, P1076, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12574
   Kuncha SK, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-02204-w
   LANG GA, 1987, HORTSCIENCE, V22, P371
   LECHOWICZ MJ, 1984, AM NAT, V124, P821, DOI 10.1086/284319
   Lenz Armando, 2013, New Phytol, V200, P1166, DOI 10.1111/nph.12452
   Linkosalo T, 2006, TREE PHYSIOL, V26, P1165, DOI 10.1093/treephys/26.9.1165
   Luquez V, 2008, TREE GENET GENOMES, V4, P279, DOI 10.1007/s11295-007-0108-y
   Lutter R, 2016, NZ J FORESTRY SCI, V46, DOI 10.1186/s40490-016-0078-7
   McKown AD, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V220, P300, DOI 10.1111/nph.15273
   McKown AD, 2014, NEW PHYTOL, V201, P1263, DOI 10.1111/nph.12601
   Medlyn BE, 2002, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V25, P1167, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00891.x
   Michelson IH, 2018, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V162, P123, DOI 10.1111/ppl.12593
   Muffler L, 2016, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V25, P1061, DOI 10.1111/geb.12466
   MURRAY MB, 1989, J APPL ECOL, V26, P693, DOI 10.2307/2404093
   NELSON ND, 1983, PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V17, P537
   Olsson C, 2013, ECOL MODEL, V266, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.06.026
   Pliura A, 2014, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V70, P513, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.09.011
   Rasulov B, 2015, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V38, P751, DOI 10.1111/pce.12435
   Richards TJ, 2020, HEREDITY, V125, P449, DOI 10.1038/s41437-020-00363-z
   Rigby JR, 2008, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V35, DOI 10.1029/2008GL033955
   Rohde A, 2011, TREE PHYSIOL, V31, P472, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpr038
   Schreiber SG, 2013, J APPL ECOL, V50, P939, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12102
   Silim SN, 2010, PHOTOSYNTH RES, V104, P19, DOI 10.1007/s11120-010-9527-y
   Soolanayakanahally RY, 2009, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V32, P1821, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02042.x
   Stener L. G., 2017, Silva Fennica, V51, P5656
   Toreti A, 2019, EARTHS FUTURE, V7, P652, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001170
   Tullus A, 2012, SCAND J FOREST RES, V27, P10, DOI 10.1080/02827581.2011.628949
   Vico G, 2019, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V42, P1913, DOI 10.1111/pce.13525
   Vitasse Y, 2009, OECOLOGIA, V161, P187, DOI 10.1007/s00442-009-1363-4
   Wang HJ, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-18743-8
   Way DA, 2015, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V38, P1725, DOI 10.1111/pce.12431
   Weih M, 2004, CAN J FOREST RES, V34, P1369, DOI 10.1139/X04-090
   Weih M, 2009, TREE PHYSIOL, V29, P1479, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpp081
   Yu QB, 2001, SILVA FENN, V35, P15, DOI 10.14214/sf.600
NR 64
TC 11
Z9 12
U1 3
U2 31
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 1939-1234
EI 1939-1242
J9 BIOENERG RES
JI BioEnergy Res.
PD JUN
PY 2021
VL 14
IS 2
SI SI
BP 445
EP 459
DI 10.1007/s12155-021-10249-5
EA FEB 2021
PG 15
WC Energy & Fuels; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Energy & Fuels; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA RZ0LT
UT WOS:000614655400001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU George, JP
   Theroux-Rancourt, G
   Rungwattana, K
   Scheffknecht, S
   Momirovic, N
   Neuhauser, L
   Weissenbacher, L
   Watzinger, A
   Hietz, P
AF George, Jan-Peter
   Theroux-Rancourt, Guillaume
   Rungwattana, Kanin
   Scheffknecht, Susanne
   Momirovic, Nevena
   Neuhauser, Lea
   Weissenbacher, Lambert
   Watzinger, Andrea
   Hietz, Peter
TI Assessing adaptive and plastic responses in growth and functional traits
   in a 10-year-old common garden experiment with pedunculate oak
   (<i>Quercus robur</i>L.) suggests that directional selection can drive
   climatic adaptation
SO EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptive plasticity; functional traits; genotype-by-environment
   interactions; heritability; local adaptation; tree growth
ID CARBON-ISOTOPE DISCRIMINATION; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; EVOLUTIONARY
   RESPONSES; Q(ST)-F-ST COMPARISONS; LOCAL ADAPTATION; GENE FLOW;
   POPULATIONS; HYBRIDIZATION; VARIABILITY; RESISTANCE
AB Understanding how tree species will respond to a future climate requires reliable and quantitative estimates of intra-specific variation under current climate conditions. We studied three 10-year-old common garden experiments established across a rainfall and drought gradient planted with nearly 10,000 pedunculate oak (Quercus roburL.) trees from ten provenances with known family structure. We aimed at disentangling adaptive and plastic responses for growth (height and diameter at breast height) as well as for leaf and wood functional traits related to adaptation to dry environments. We used restricted maximum likelihood approaches to assess additive genetic variation expressed as narrow-sense heritability (h(2)), quantitative trait differentiation among provenances (Q(ST)), and genotype-by-environment interactions (GxE). We found strong and significant patterns of local adaptation in growth in all three common gardens, suggesting that transfer of seed material should not exceed a climatic distance of approximately 1 degrees C under current climatic conditions, while transfer along precipitation gradients seems to be less stringent. Moreover, heritability reached 0.64 for tree height and 0.67 for dbh at the dry margin of the testing spectrum, suggesting significant additive genetic variation of potential use for future selection and tree breeding. GxE interactions in growth were significant and explained less phenotypic variation than origin of seed source (4% versus 10%). Functional trait variation among provenances was partly related to drought regimes at provenances origins but had moderate explanatory power for growth. We conclude that directional selection, either naturally or through breeding, is the most likely and feasible outcome for pedunculate oak to adapt to warmer and drier climate conditions in the future.
C1 [George, Jan-Peter; Weissenbacher, Lambert] Fed Res & Training Ctr Forests Nat Hazards & Land, Dept Forest Genet, Vienna, Austria.
   [Theroux-Rancourt, Guillaume; Rungwattana, Kanin; Scheffknecht, Susanne; Momirovic, Nevena; Neuhauser, Lea; Hietz, Peter] Univ Appl Life Sci & Nat Resources Vienna BOKU, Inst Bot, Vienna, Austria.
   [Watzinger, Andrea] Univ Appl Life Sci & Nat Resources Vienna BOKU, Inst Soil Res, Vienna, Austria.
   [George, Jan-Peter] Univ Tartu, Tartu Observ, Toravere, Estonia.
   [George, Jan-Peter] Kasetsart Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Bot, Bangkok, Thailand.
C3 University of Tartu; Tartu Observatory; Kasetsart University
RP George, JP (corresponding author), Fed Res & Training Ctr Forests Nat Hazards & Land, Dept Forest Genet, Vienna, Austria.
EM jan.peter.george@ut.ee
RI Hietz, Peter/AEP-2325-2022; Watzinger, Andrea/AAB-4961-2020;
   Theroux-Rancourt, Guillaume/O-1903-2017
OI Momirovic, Nevena/0000-0001-9156-0203; Theroux-Rancourt,
   Guillaume/0000-0002-2591-0524
FU Austrian Science Fund [M2445]; Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [M2245]
   Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
FX Austrian Science Fund, Grant/Award Number: M2445
CR Ahrens CW, 2019, EVOL APPL, V12, P1178, DOI 10.1111/eva.12796
   Aitken SN, 2008, EVOL APPL, V1, P95, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2007.00013.x
   Aitken SN, 2016, EVOL APPL, V9, P271, DOI 10.1111/eva.12293
   Albert CH, 2011, PERSPECT PLANT ECOL, V13, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.ppees.2011.04.003
   Alberto FJ, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P1645, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12181
   Ramírez-Valiente JA, 2011, TREE GENET GENOMES, V7, P285, DOI 10.1007/s11295-010-0331-9
   Allen CD, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P660, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001
   Bacilieri R, 1996, EVOLUTION, V50, P900, DOI [10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03898.x, 10.2307/2410861]
   Garzón MB, 2011, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V20, P766, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00646.x
   BENJAMINI Y, 1995, J R STAT SOC B, V57, P289, DOI 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
   Bolnick DI, 2011, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V26, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.009
   Bussotti F, 2015, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V111, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.11.006
   CHAKRABORTY D, 2019, 25 IUFRO WORLD C CUR
   Chakraborty D, 2016, EUR J FOREST RES, V135, P919, DOI 10.1007/s10342-016-0984-5
   Chave J, 2009, ECOL LETT, V12, P351, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x
   Chen ZQ, 2017, TREE GENET GENOMES, V13, DOI 10.1007/s11295-017-1103-6
   Corcuera L, 2011, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V25, P1033, DOI 10.1007/s00468-011-0578-2
   Doube M, 2010, BONE, V47, P1076, DOI 10.1016/j.bone.2010.08.023
   Ducousso A., 2004, EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for genetic conservation and use for pedun culate and sessile oaks (Quercus robur and Q. petraea)
   Fady B, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V375, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.015
   FALCONER DS, 1989, INTRO QUANTITATIVE G, P187
   FARQUHAR GD, 1989, ANNU REV PLANT PHYS, V40, P503, DOI 10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443
   Fetter KC, 2019, NEW PHYTOL, V223, P1671, DOI 10.1111/nph.15892
   Ghalambor CK, 2007, FUNCT ECOL, V21, P394, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01283.x
   Gilbert KJ, 2015, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V15, P262, DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12303
   Grady KC, 2015, RESTOR ECOL, V23, P811, DOI 10.1111/rec.12245
   Hajek P, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00791
   Hamann A, 2013, B AM METEOROL SOC, V94, P1307, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00145.1
   Harfouche A, 2012, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V17, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.11.005
   Henderson C. R., 1984, APPL LINEAR MODELS A
   Jacob D, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P563, DOI 10.1007/s10113-013-0499-2
   Jobbágy EG, 2000, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V9, P253, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00162.x
   Kawecki TJ, 2004, ECOL LETT, V7, P1225, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00684.x
   Kelly JK., 2011, Nat Educ Knowl, V4, P5
   Kilian W., 1994, FBVA BER, V82, P55
   Kjær ED, 2012, EVOL APPL, V5, P219, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00222.x
   Klok EJ, 2009, INT J CLIMATOL, V29, P1182, DOI 10.1002/joc.1779
   Konnert M., 2015, Use and transfer of forest reproductive material in Europe in the context of climate change, P75
   Kremer A, 1997, GENETICS, V145, P1229
   LACY R C, 1987, Conservation Biology, V1, P143, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1987.tb00023.x
   Lamy JB, 2014, NEW PHYTOL, V201, P874, DOI 10.1111/nph.12556
   Leinonen T, 2013, NAT REV GENET, V14, P179, DOI 10.1038/nrg3395
   Levanic T, 2011, TREE PHYSIOL, V31, P298, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpq111
   Li YJ, 2017, TREE GENET GENOMES, V13, DOI 10.1007/s11295-017-1144-x
   Loehle C, 1998, J BIOGEOGR, V25, P735, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.2540735.x
   Maechler M., 2019, cluster: Cluster Analysis Basics and Extensions. R package version 2.1.0
   Matesanz S, 2014, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V103, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.09.004
   Nicotra AB, 2010, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V15, P684, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.008
   O'Brien MJ, 2017, J APPL ECOL, V54, P1669, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12874
   Olson ME, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P7551, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1721728115
   Pérez-Harguindeguy N, 2013, AUST J BOT, V61, P167, DOI 10.1071/BT12225
   Petit RJ, 2004, NEW PHYTOL, V161, P151, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00944.x
   Petit RJ, 2002, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V156, P5, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00645-4
   Pigliucci M, 2005, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V20, P481, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2005.06.001
   Porth I, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0142864
   R Core Team, 2022, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
   Ramírez-Valiente JA, 2019, TREE PHYSIOL, V39, P427, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpy108
   Ramirez-Valiente JA, 2017, FRONT PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.00585
   Raymond CA, 2011, TREE GENET GENOMES, V7, P819, DOI 10.1007/s11295-011-0376-4
   Rungwattana K, 2018, FUNCT ECOL, V32, P2638, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13203
   Sáenz-Romero C, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P2831, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13576
   Savolainen O, 2007, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V38, P595, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095646
   Schneider CA, 2012, NAT METHODS, V9, P671, DOI 10.1038/nmeth.2089
   Searle S.R., 1992, Variance components, V391
   Torres-Ruiz JM, 2019, TREE PHYSIOL, V39, P1736, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpz090
   Tyree M.T., 2013, XYLEM STRUCTURE ASCE
   VIA S, 1985, EVOLUTION, V39, P505, DOI [10.2307/2408649, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00391.x]
   Wang T, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P2404, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01271.x
   Wang TL, 2012, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V51, P16, DOI 10.1175/JAMC-D-11-043.1
   Wang TL, 2010, ECOL APPL, V20, P153, DOI 10.1890/08-2257.1
   Wilson AJ, 2010, J ANIM ECOL, V79, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01639.x
   WRICKE G, 1962, Z PFLANZENZUCHT, V47, P92
   WRIGHT S, 1951, ANN EUGENIC, V15, P323
NR 73
TC 22
Z9 22
U1 2
U2 37
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1752-4571
J9 EVOL APPL
JI Evol. Appl.
PD OCT
PY 2020
VL 13
IS 9
BP 2422
EP 2438
DI 10.1111/eva.13034
EA JUN 2020
PG 17
WC Evolutionary Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Evolutionary Biology
GA NS4EO
UT WOS:000540780600001
PM 33005231
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Hanson, HI
   Wickenberg, B
   Olsson, JA
AF Hanson, Helena, I
   Wickenberg, Bjorn
   Olsson, Johanna Alkan
TI Working on the boundaries-How do science use and interpret the
   nature-based solution concept?
SO LAND USE POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Nature-based solutions; Ecosystem services; Green infrastructure;
   Land-use; Green space governance; Boundary objects
ID REGULATING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; CLIMATE ADAPTATION;
   URBAN GARDENS; CO-BENEFITS; MANAGEMENT; CHALLENGES; FRAMEWORK; POLICY;
   RESILIENCE
AB Nature-based solutions (NBS) is the latest contribution to the green concept family. NBS is defined as actions based in nature addressing societal challenges. In this study, we lean on the concept boundary object, broken down into three analytical categories: use, core ideas and granularities, to explore the cohesive and fragmenting powers of the NBS concept, and discuss its future role in green space governance.
   The study is based on a structured, qualitative review of 112 scientific peer-reviewed publications that use the term NBS. Most publications are from 2017 or later, highlighting the novelty of the NBS concept. The concept has a strong footing in the European urban context. Flood mitigation and functional ecosystems and biodiversity conservation are the most targeted sustainability goals in the publications, and a diversity of solutions are considered. There is a close link between the NBS concept, green infrastructure, and the ecosystem service concept, indicating a path dependency in its uptake and use. The publications demonstrate a low level of integration of the NBS concept (i.e. it is commonly used as a buzz word). Most empirical studies focus solely on environmental benefits delivered by NBS, and few studies assess social, economic, and environmental benefits together, which is a central ambition of the concept.
   We conclude that the NBS concept is working on the boundaries between different scientific disciplines and between science and policy. Depending on how the research community deals with identified temporal, epistemological and ontological granularities, we conclude that the concept has three potential developmental pathways; broader and deeper, biased with stickiness to older green concepts and an empty buzz word.
C1 [Hanson, Helena, I; Olsson, Johanna Alkan] Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Res, Ecol Bldg, S-22362 Lund, Sweden.
   [Wickenberg, Bjorn] Lund Univ, Int Inst Ind Environm Econ, S-22100 Lund, Sweden.
C3 Lund University; Lund University
RP Hanson, HI (corresponding author), Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Res, Ecol Bldg, S-22362 Lund, Sweden.
EM Helena.hanson@cec.lu.se
OI Wickenberg, Bjorn/0000-0002-0838-9175
FU Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and
   Spatial Planning (Formas) [2016-00324]; Vinnova [2016-00324] Funding
   Source: Vinnova
FX We thank seminar participants at PBL Netherlands Environmental
   Assessment Agency for valuable input on the results, colleagues at Lund
   University for supportive comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript,
   and Carlos Martinez Avila for thoroughly reading later draft of the
   manuscript. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive
   comments on earlier version of the manuscript. The research was financed
   by the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences
   and Spatial Planning (Formas)through the 'Nature-based solutions for
   urban challenges' project (grant number 2016-00324).
CR Abson DJ, 2014, ECOL ECON, V103, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012
   [Anonymous], SCI TOTAL ENV
   [Anonymous], URBAN FORESTRY URBAN
   [Anonymous], CONN BIOD CLIM CHANG
   [Anonymous], 1999, FAIRNESS FUTURITY ES
   [Anonymous], COASTAL ENG
   [Anonymous], 2015, Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature -based solutions & re-naturing cities, DOI DOI 10.2777/479582
   [Anonymous], PHILOS PHENOMENOL RE
   [Anonymous], LAND USE
   [Anonymous], SUSTAINABILITY
   [Anonymous], 1995, SCI QUEST REALITY, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-25249-7_12
   [Anonymous], COASTAL STRUCTURES S
   [Anonymous], J ENV POLICY PLANNIN
   [Anonymous], ANN NEW YORK ACAD SC
   [Anonymous], 2012, IUCN PROGR 2013 2016
   [Anonymous], METHODS EVALUATING E
   [Anonymous], 1998, Doing a Literature Review Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination
   [Anonymous], GEOHERITAGE
   [Anonymous], ARTS PERFORMING ARTS
   [Anonymous], HUM RELAT
   [Anonymous], ECOSYSTEM BASED DISA
   [Anonymous], 2005, MILLENIUM ECOSYSTEM
   Arkema KK, 2017, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1399, P5, DOI 10.1111/nyas.13322
   ARNSTEIN SR, 1969, J AM I PLANNERS, V35, P216, DOI 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Barh F, 2000, SIGNIFYING IDENTITIES, P17
   Barot S, 2017, ECOL ENG, V99, P486, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.11.071
   Bekessy SA, 2018, BIOL CONSERV, V224, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.05.017
   Belle JA, 2018, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V10, DOI [10.4102/jamba.v10i1.400, 10.4102/jamba.v10i1.40]
   Bennett G, 2016, ECOSYST SERV, V17, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.006
   Blom Tannelie., 2014, The politics of information: The case of the European Union
   Boelee E, 2017, WATER POLICY, V19, P820, DOI 10.2166/wp.2017.105
   Bowker GC., 2008, Sorting things out: classification and its consequences, V1
   Brink E, 2018, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V28, P82, DOI 10.1002/eet.1795
   Brink E, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V36, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.003
   Cáceres L, 2018, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V32, P1307, DOI 10.1007/s11269-017-1871-7
   Camps-Calvet M, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.007
   Capotorti G, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P3958, DOI 10.3390/su7043958
   Cariñanos P, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V155, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.02.015
   Cash DW, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P8086, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1231332100
   Catalano C, 2018, ECOL ENG, V115, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.01.006
   Celis JE, 2014, MOL ONCOL, V8, P447, DOI 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.03.013
   Chen ES, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V156, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.007
   Chen HB, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8040392
   Chen Jiquan, 2016, Ecol Process, V5, P7
   Clarke S., 2009, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, V23, P195, DOI DOI 10.1080/02698590903007170
   Cohen-Shacham E., 2016, NATURE BASED SOLUTIO, V97, P2016
   Connop S, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.013
   D'Amato D, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V168, P716, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053
   Davies HJ, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V156, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.020
   Denjean B, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.006
   Derkzen ML, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V157, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.027
   Eggermont H, 2015, GAIA, V24, P243, DOI 10.14512/gaia.24.4.9
   Erixon H, 2013, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V14, P349, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2013.813960
   Ferreira ML, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V155, P314, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.02.023
   Fink HS, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8030254
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Fukuda-Parr S, 2014, J HUM DEV CAPABIL, V15, P118, DOI 10.1080/19452829.2014.910180
   Garfi M, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V161, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.116
   Geels FW, 2002, RES POLICY, V31, P1257, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   GIERYN TF, 1983, AM SOCIOL REV, V48, P781, DOI 10.2307/2095325
   Gooch D, 2017, J ASSOC INF SCI TECH, V68, P378, DOI 10.1002/asi.23658
   Haase D., 2015, Sustainability of Water Quality and Ecology, V5, P77, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SWAQE.2015.02.003
   Haase D, 2017, HABITAT INT, V64, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.005
   Halbe J, 2018, J HYDROL, V559, P984, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.001
   Hansen R, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.013
   HARAWAY D, 1988, FEMINIST STUD, V14, P575, DOI 10.2307/3178066
   Hatipoglu B, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V111, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.059
   Hernández-Morcillo M, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V80, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.013
   Hoyle H, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V25, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.009
   IUCN, 2009, 15 SESS C PART UN FR
   Jim CY, 2003, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V65, P95, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00244-X
   Jorgensen M.B., 2012, Qualitative Studies, V3, P78
   Jurczak T, 2018, ECOL ENG, V110, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.09.019
   Kabisch N, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P362, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.004
   Kabisch N, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08373-210239
   Kavian A, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10040445
   Keesstra S, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V610, P997, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.077
   Keune H, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V16, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.06.001
   Koprowska K, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V31, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.018
   Kremer P, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08445-210229
   Kronenberg J, 2015, BIOSCIENCE, V65, P1096, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biv135
   Lafortezza R, 2016, ENVIRON RES, V147, P576, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2016.02.018
   Langemeyer J, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V170, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.013
   Lara JL, 2016, COAST ENG, V107, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2015.09.012
   Lin ZH, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V158, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.016
   Liquete C, 2016, ECOSYST SERV, V22, P392, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.011
   Liu L, 2017, WATER POLICY, V19, P997, DOI 10.2166/wp.2017.165
   Livingston JE, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V90, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.003
   Loiseau E, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V139, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.024
   Mackinnon K., 2008, Biodiversity, Climate Change, and Adaptation: Nature-Based Solutions from the World Bank Portfolio
   Marando F, 2016, FORESTS, V7, DOI 10.3390/f7070150
   Masseroni D, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9010020
   Mayrhofer JP, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V57, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.005
   Metcalfe P, 2017, HYDROL PROCESS, V31, P1734, DOI 10.1002/hyp.11140
   Mexia T, 2018, ENVIRON RES, V160, P469, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.023
   Moosavi S, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V196, P930, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.027
   Nahlik AM, 2012, ECOL ECON, V77, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.001
   Narayan S, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-09269-z
   Nguyen TP, 2018, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V155, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.02.005
   Nita MR, 2018, ENVIRON RES, V160, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.007
   Nordin AC, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI 10.5751/ES-09420-220326
   Olsson L, 2015, SCI ADV, V1, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1400217
   Opdam P, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10010220
   Opdam P, 2015, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V16, P63, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2014.997786
   Opdam P, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1439, DOI 10.1007/s10980-013-9925-6
   Ostoic SK, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V31, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.03.005
   Pálsdóttir AM, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V29, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.016
   Panno A, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.016
   Pollitt C, 2011, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V13, P641, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2010.532963
   Powledge F, 2013, BIOSCIENCE, V63, P517, DOI 10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.4
   Raymond C.M., 2017, EKLIPSE EXPERT WORKI
   Raymond CM, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V77, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008
   Reguero B.G., 2014, Coastal Engineering Proceedings, V1, P25, DOI DOI 10.9753/ICCE.V34.MANAGEMENT.25
   Reynolds CC, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9050785
   Richardson M, 2017, ERGONOMICS, V60, P292, DOI 10.1080/00140139.2016.1157213
   Ridley D., 2012, LIT REV STEP BY STEP, VSecond
   Roberts CM, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P6167, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1701262114
   Rodrigo-Comino J, 2018, EARTH-SCI REV, V179, P436, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.02.014
   Russo A, 2017, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V242, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.026
   Scarano FR, 2017, PERSPECT ECOL CONSER, V15, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.pecon.2017.05.003
   Schleyer C, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9071107
   Scott M, 2016, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V17, P267, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2016.1158907
   Shafray E, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9040587
   Shao CL, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.001
   Silva L, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V183, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.086
   Sousa AI, 2017, ECOL ENG, V104, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.04.004
   STAR SL, 1989, SOC STUD SCI, V19, P387, DOI 10.1177/030631289019003001
   Star SL, 2010, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V35, P601, DOI 10.1177/0162243910377624
   Stürck J, 2015, APPL GEOGR, V63, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.06.009
   Timberlake TJ, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V144, P257, DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-2031-z
   Tomao A, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V156, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.006
   Turnhout E, 2007, ECOL INDIC, V7, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.12.003
   United Nations, 2015, No.A/RES/70/1.
   van den Bosch MA, 2015, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-2574-8
   Versini PA, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V173, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.02.001
   Vieira J, 2018, ENVIRON RES, V160, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.006
   Vujcic M, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V158, P385, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.030
   Wai KM, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.010
   Wai KM, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V158, P753, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.036
   Wamsler C, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08266-210131
   Wang ZF, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.024
   Werbeloff L, 2011, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V64, P781, DOI 10.2166/wst.2011.495
   Wild TC, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V158, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.043
   Wilkinson C, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05368-180137
   Xiang PC, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9071205
   Xing YG, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9010149
   Yao X, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9040577
   Zimmermann E, 2016, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V161, P2241, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.822
   Zölch T, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V170, P966, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.146
NR 149
TC 97
Z9 100
U1 3
U2 127
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-8377
EI 1873-5754
J9 LAND USE POLICY
JI Land Use Pol.
PD JAN
PY 2020
VL 90
AR 104302
DI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104302
PG 16
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA JW5LQ
UT WOS:000503093800044
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Cai, YB
   Chen, YH
   Tong, C
AF Cai, Yuanbin
   Chen, Yanhong
   Tong, Chuan
TI Spatiotemporal evolution of urban green space and its impact on the
   urban thermal environment based on remote sensing data: A case study of
   Fuzhou City, China
SO URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
LA English
DT Article
DE Remote sensing; Spatiotemporal evolution; Thermal environment; Urban
   green space; Vegetation and cooling index
ID LAND-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; HEAT-ISLAND; RAPID URBANIZATION;
   INFRASTRUCTURE; PATTERNS; WETLANDS; HEALTH; CITIES; WAVES; FORM
AB Taking the main city of Fuzhou as the study area, the relationship between the spatiotemporal evolution of urban green space (UGS) and the urban thermal environment from 1993 to 2013 was investigated using a set of remote sensing images. The evolution of UGS is obvious in the study area, where UGS loss (42.83 km(2)) > UGS extension (4.99 km(2)) > UGS exchange (2.61 km(2)). UGS loss affects forest/grass > water > wetland. Furthermore, the area defined as high temperature zones increased by 23.11 km(2) in 2013, twice as much as that in 1993. However, the influence of UGS on the urban thermal environment differs by type and evolution: water has the greatest cooling effect, followed by wetland and forest/grass, and UGS loss (8.67 degrees C) > UGS exchange (4.00 degrees C) > UGS extension (2.90 degrees C) > UGS unchanged (2.45 degrees C). Finally, the vegetation and cooling index classified the mechanism of temperature response induced by different types of UGS evolution. The evolution of UGS loss usually simulated the movement of the corresponding pixel from the low land surface temperature and high vegetation coverage to the opposite situation. Regression analyses demonstrated that the effect of elevated land surface temperature generated from the reduction of water and forest/grass reached 0.81 degrees C and 0.72 degrees C, respectively, in 20 years, indicating that the loss of a significant amount of UGS during urbanization was the primary influence on the urban thermal environment. This study may provide more useful information for researchers and decision-makers engaged in urban planning, urban regeneration, and sustainable land development, especially focusing on the issues of climate adaption and the urban heat island (UHI) effect mitigation.
C1 [Cai, Yuanbin] Fuzhou Univ, Coll Environm & Resources, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Yanhong; Tong, Chuan] Fujian Normal Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Humid Subtrop Ecogeog Proc, Fuzhou 350007, Fujian, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Yanhong; Tong, Chuan] Fujian Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Fuzhou 350007, Fujian, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Yanhong] Fuzhou Univ, Zhicheng Coll, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian, Peoples R China.
C3 Fuzhou University; Fujian Normal University; Fujian Normal University;
   Fuzhou University
RP Tong, C (corresponding author), Fujian Normal Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Humid Subtrop Ecogeog Proc, Fuzhou 350007, Fujian, Peoples R China.; Tong, C (corresponding author), Fujian Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Fuzhou 350007, Fujian, Peoples R China.
EM tongch@fjnu.edu.cn
FU Fujian Education Research Project [JT180021]; Social Science Planning
   Project of Fujian [FJ2016C033]
FX This study is support by the Fujian Education Research Project
   (JT180021) and Social Science Planning Project of Fujian (NO.
   FJ2016C033). Many thanks to Chinese Academy of Sciences for their data
   sharing platforms known as Geographic Space Cloud
   (http://www.gscloud.cn/) and the Open Spatial Data Sharing Project
   (http://ids.ceode.ac.cn/).
CR Bowler DE, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V97, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
   Buyantuyev A, 2010, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V25, P17, DOI 10.1007/s10980-009-9402-4
   Cai YB, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080773
   Cai YB, 2013, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V185, P5111, DOI 10.1007/s10661-012-2929-x
   Cai YB, 2016, WETLANDS, V36, P285, DOI 10.1007/s13157-016-0738-7
   Cai YB, 2015, POL J ENVIRON STUD, V24, P1919, DOI 10.15244/pjoes/58593
   Cai YB, 2012, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V22, P568, DOI 10.1007/s11769-012-0564-7
   Cai Z, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V39, P487, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.033
   Chen XL, 2006, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V104, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2005.11.016
   Costanza R, 1997, NATURE, V387, P253, DOI 10.1038/387253a0
   Dixon PG, 2003, J APPL METEOROL, V42, P1273, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<1273:PACOAU>2.0.CO;2
   Feyisa GL, 2016, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V175, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.026
   [傅伯杰 Fu Bojie], 2006, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V61, P1123
   [高云 Gao Yun], 2014, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V34, P1094
   Garuma GF, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V24, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2018.02.003
   Hamada S, 2010, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V9, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.10.002
   Herath HMPIK, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V29, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.013
   [黄荣峰 Huang Rongfeng], 2005, [遥感信息, Remote Sensing Information], V0, P36
   Jaganmohan M, 2016, J ENVIRON QUAL, V45, P134, DOI 10.2134/jeq2015.01.0062
   Jin XB, 2017, CITIES, V63, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.01.002
   Knox JC, 2001, CATENA, V42, P193, DOI 10.1016/S0341-8162(00)00138-7
   Koc CB, 2018, SOL ENERGY, V166, P486, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2018.03.008
   Kong FH, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V128, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.018
   Lan S. R., 2009, CHIN URBAN FOR, P77, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1672-4925.2009.01.001, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-4925.2009.01.001]
   Li D, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/5/054009
   Li D, 2013, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V52, P2051, DOI 10.1175/JAMC-D-13-02.1
   Li JX, 2011, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V115, P3249, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.07.008
   [李双成 LI Shuancheng], 2009, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V28, P63
   Liu F, 2011, IET INFORM SECUR, V5, P51, DOI 10.1049/iet-ifs.2008.0064
   [刘智才 Liu Zhicai], 2014, [湿地科学, Wetland Science], V12, P590
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Miao SG, 2009, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V48, P484, DOI 10.1175/2008JAMC1909.1
   Moonen P, 2012, FRONT ARCHIT RES, V1, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.foar.2012.05.002
   Ngom R, 2016, APPL GEOGR, V66, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.11.008
   Nguyen OV, 2015, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V187, DOI 10.1007/s10661-015-4691-3
   Qin Z., 2001, Acta Geographica Sinica, V56, P456, DOI [10.1142/S0252959901000401, DOI 10.1142/S0252959901000401, 10.11821/xb200104009, DOI 10.11821/XB200104009]
   Rana Md. Masud Parves, 2011, Environment Development and Sustainability, V13, P237, DOI 10.1007/s10668-010-9258-4
   Ren Y, 2016, ENVIRON POLLUT, V216, P519, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.004
   Saaroni H, 2003, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V47, P156, DOI 10.1007/s00484-003-0161-7
   Sterling S, 2008, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V22, DOI 10.1029/2007GB002959
   Sun RH, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V20, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.006
   Takebayashi H, 2007, BUILD ENVIRON, V42, P2971, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.06.017
   Tan JG, 2010, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V54, P75, DOI 10.1007/s00484-009-0256-x
   Tratalos J, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V83, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.05.003
   Turner MG, 2005, ECOLOGY, V86, P1967, DOI 10.1890/04-0890
   Viegas CV, 2013, CITIES, V35, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.05.006
   [王琳 WANG Lin], 2006, [地球信息科学, Geo-information Science], V8, P129
   [吴琳娜 Wu Linna], 2014, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V69, P54
   [徐涵秋 XU Han-Qiu], 2009, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V29, P2456
   Yang J, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V22, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.01.002
   Yu ZW, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V29, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.008
   [张春桂 Zhang Chungui], 2006, [气象, Meteorological Monthly], V32, P20
   [张伟 Zhang Wei], 2015, [华东师范大学学报. 自然科学版, Journal of East China Normal University. Natural Science], P123
   Zuvela-Aloise M, 2016, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V135, P425, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1596-2
NR 54
TC 58
Z9 69
U1 15
U2 198
PU ELSEVIER GMBH
PI MUNICH
PA HACKERBRUCKE 6, 80335 MUNICH, GERMANY
SN 1618-8667
J9 URBAN FOR URBAN GREE
JI Urban For. Urban Green.
PD MAY
PY 2019
VL 41
BP 333
EP 343
DI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.04.012
PG 11
WC Plant Sciences; Environmental Studies; Forestry; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Plant Sciences; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry; Urban
   Studies
GA HY5TP
UT WOS:000468191300037
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Vizzotto, M
   Fetter, MD
   Corbelini, DD
   Pereira, MC
   Gonzales, TN
AF Vizzotto, M.
   da Rosa Fetter, M.
   Dutra Corbelini, D.
   Couto Pereira, M.
   Nogueira Gonzales, T.
BE Mahapatra, SC
   Agrawal, V
TI Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Blueberry (<i>Vaccinium
   ashei</i> Reade)
SO II INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MEDICINAL AND NUTRACEUTICAL PLANTS
SE Acta Horticulturae
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT 2nd International Symposium on Medicinal and Nutraceutical Plants
CY NOV 25-27, 2009
CL New Delhi, INDIA
SP Int Soc Hort Sci (ISHS)
DE genotype; cultivars; anthocyanins; phenolic compounds
ID ANTHOCYANIN CONTENT; PHENOLIC-ACIDS; CULTIVAR; BLACKBERRY; MATURITY;
   CAPACITY; VARIETY; FRUITS; RISK
AB The correlation of fruits and vegetables consumption and good health is well established; however, there are many fruits that need to be studied considering the environmental conditions where they grow. Blueberry is one of the most important small fruit studied in the world; however, little is known about the blueberry cultivated in Brazil. There is an incentive to produce blueberry in the southern region of Brazil, mainly cultivars from the rabbiteye group, due to their rusticity and climate adaptation. It is common to observe papers about blueberry and the health benefits in the international journals; however, little is known about the blueberry produced in Brazil. This study had the aim of to determine the content of total phenolic, anthocyanins and antioxidant activity of blueberry cultivars from the rabbiteye group. Four blueberry cultivars were analyzed ('Climax', 'Powder Blue', 'Florida' and 'Alice Blue'). The blueberry genotypes were harvested at Embrapa Clima Temperado's field and transported to the Food Science and Technology lab to be analyzed for their total content of phenolics, anthocyanins and antioxidant activity. Total phenolic content was measured using the Folin-Ciocalteau reagent mix. Anthocyanins were measured by the pH difference method. Antioxidant activity was measured using the stable radical DPPH. Regarding the results, the cultivar 'Alice Blue' had the highest phenolic content and antioxidant activity among the analyzed cultivars. The anthocyanin content was superior in the 'Climax' cultivar. Selected blueberry genotypes had equal or greater phenolic and antioxidant activity than blueberry cultivated in North America. The level of total phenolic did not correlate with the antioxidant activity in the studied blueberry cultivars. The levels of bioactive compounds varies within the blueberry genotypes examined indicating that breeding and selection could be done to develop cultivars with improved levels of these chemical substances.
C1 [Vizzotto, M.] Embrapa Clima Temperado, BR-96001970 Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
C3 Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria (EMBRAPA)
RP Vizzotto, M (corresponding author), Embrapa Clima Temperado, Rodovia BR 392,Km 78, BR-96001970 Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
EM vizzotto@cpact.embrapa.br
RI ; Vizzotto, Marcia/F-3910-2015
OI Couto Pereira, Marina/0000-0001-7918-3548; Nogueira Gonzalez,
   Tatiane/0000-0002-9350-6152; Vizzotto, Marcia/0000-0002-8071-4980
CR Akamatsu E, 2006, HORTSCIENCE, V41, P1082
   BRAND-WILLIAMS W, 1995, FOOD SCI TECHNOL-LEB, V28, P25
   Connor AM, 2002, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V127, P89, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.127.1.89
   Deighton N, 2000, J SCI FOOD AGR, V80, P1307, DOI 10.1002/1097-0010(200007)80:9<1307::AID-JSFA638>3.0.CO;2-P
   Feldman EB, 2001, NUTR REV, V59, P24
   FULEKI T, 1968, J FOOD SCI, V33, P72, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1968.tb00887.x
   Häkkinen S, 1999, FOOD RES INT, V32, P345, DOI 10.1016/S0963-9969(99)00095-2
   Häkkinen SH, 2000, FOOD RES INT, V33, P517, DOI 10.1016/S0963-9969(00)00086-7
   HERTOG MGL, 1995, ARCH INTERN MED, V155, P381, DOI 10.1001/archinte.155.4.381
   Kalt W, 1999, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V47, P4638, DOI 10.1021/jf990266t
   Prior RL, 1998, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V46, P2686, DOI 10.1021/jf980145d
   Shahidi F., 2004, PHENOLICS FOOD NUTRA, V490, P131
   Siriwoharn T, 2004, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V52, P8021, DOI 10.1021/jf048619y
   Swain T., 1959, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, V10, P63, DOI 10.1002/jsfa.2740100110
   Taruscio TG, 2004, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V52, P3169, DOI 10.1021/jf0307595
   Wang SY, 2000, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V48, P140, DOI 10.1021/jf9908345
NR 16
TC 3
Z9 4
U1 0
U2 8
PU INT SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
PI LEUVEN 1
PA PO BOX 500, 3001 LEUVEN 1, BELGIUM
SN 0567-7572
EI 2406-6168
BN 978-90-66057-45-6
J9 ACTA HORTIC
PY 2013
VL 972
BP 111
EP 115
PG 5
WC Agronomy; Plant Sciences; Horticulture
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Agriculture; Plant Sciences
GA BGX98
UT WOS:000324539000014
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Fazeli, H
   Goodarzi, A
AF Fazeli, H.
   Goodarzi, A.
BE Hernandez, S
   Brebbia, CA
   DeWilde, WP
TI The principles of Vastu as a traditional architectural belief system
   from an environmental perspective
SO ECO-ARCHITECTURE III: HARMONISATION BETWEEN ARCHITECTURE AND NATURE
SE WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT 3rd International Conference on Harmonisation between Architecture and
   Nature
CY APR 12-14, 2010
CL A Coruna, SPAIN
SP Wessex Inst Technol, WIT Transact Ecol & Environm
DE principles of Vastu Shastra; the sun rays; magnetic zones; Geopathic
   Zones; concentric squares; the surrounding environment
AB The shortage of technological discoveries in traditional architecture - which has now made it possible to warm and cool any area regardless of considering the proper direction or geometrical shape - used to lead the habitants to make use of natural phenomena to provide physical and emotional comfort. Therefore, traditional architecture is always accompanied with a set of rules and principles that are to some extent based on environmental criteria as well as the dominant belief system of the specific culture; these two variables seem to be inter-related and in some situations dominating one another. Although assigning auspicious directions, auspicious geometrical patterns in the plan configuration, the concept of concentric zones, elongation of the whole complex and the facade considerations seem to be religious in basis or due to cultural values, still a great amount of such principles in traditional architectural guidelines are derived from the environment; thus a number of common characteristics of vernacular architecture, such as the presence of vegetation in the buildings' site, the use of local materials that create a micro-climate adaptable with human comfort and structural forms associated with the climatic positions, which can also be applied to other cultures with the same climate, are present as parts of all traditional structures.
   Vastu as one of the most ancient architectural belief systems, similar to other traditional architectural sciences such as Feng Shui, also deals with the principles designed to make the most use of the environment and more specifically climate as one of its dominant factors. Based on the knowledge of the Sun Rays, the Earth's Magnetic Poles and the Geopathic Zones, many rules have been legislated in ancient Indian architecture dealing with environmental criteria that are now considered superstitions; however, applying them may be useful in designing buildings in complete harmony with the surrounding nature.
C1 [Fazeli, H.; Goodarzi, A.] Univ Malaya, Dept Architecture, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
C3 Universiti Malaya
RI Fazeli, Hengameh/GWV-6721-2022
OI Fazeli, Hengameh/0000-0002-3056-2528
CR AKOLA T, 2000, VASTU SHASTRA ITS IM, P45
   Bachler K, 2007, EARTH RAD
   BHATTACHARYA T, 1974, STUDY VASTUVIDYA CAN
   Day C., 2004, PLACES SOUL ARCHITEC, V2nd
   FACTS V, 2009, RALITY VASTU
   Gray John., 2006, Domestic Mandala: Architecture of Lifeworlds in Nepal
   Hari A.R., 2000, Amazing science of vaastu
   Kent S., 1993, Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space-an Interdiscplinary Cross-Cultural Study. New Directions in Archaeology
   Krishna Talavane., 2001, The Vaastu Workbook: Using the Subtle Energies of the Indian Art of Placement to Enhance Health, Prosperity, and Happiness in Your Home
   KUMAR A, 2005, VAASTU AN SCI LIVING
   Lawlor Robert., 2002, Sacred Geometry: Philosophy and Practice
   LEVITT S, 2000, TAOIST FENG SHUI
   MARC O, 1975, PSYCHOL HOUSE
   OLDENBERG H, 1886, SACRED TEXTS
   Olivier Paul., 1997, Encyclopedia of Vernacular Architecture of the World
   Pitzl R. P., 2004, ENCY HUMAN GEOGRAPHY
   SAHASRABUDHE G, 2005, COSMIC SCI VAASTU
   Silverman S., 2007, Vastu: Transcendental home design in harmony with nature
   STROBEL N, 2008, ASTRONOMY NOTES
   VASUDEV D, 1998, VASTU ASTROLOGY ARCH
NR 20
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 1
U2 12
PU WIT PRESS
PI SOUTHAMPTON
PA ASHURST LODGE, SOUTHAMPTON SO40 7AA, ASHURST, ENGLAND
SN 1743-3541
BN 978-1-84564-430-7
J9 WIT TRANS ECOL ENVIR
JI WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ.
PY 2010
VL 128
BP 97
EP 108
DI 10.2495/ARC100091
PG 12
WC Architecture
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Science &amp; Humanities (CPCI-SSH)
SC Architecture
GA BQI65
UT WOS:000281122400009
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Gibert, P
   Moreteau, B
   David, JR
AF Gibert, P.
   Moreteau, B.
   David, J. R.
TI Phenotypic plasticity of abdomen pigmentation in two geographic
   populations of <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>: male-female comparison
   and sexual dimorphism
SO GENETICA
LA English
DT Article
DE Climatic adaptation; Modular trait; Isofemale lines; Reaction norms;
   Growth temperature; Tergites melanisation
ID THORACIC TRIDENT PIGMENTATION; NATURAL-POPULATIONS; REACTION NORMS;
   GROWTH TEMPERATURE; ABDOMINAL PIGMENTATION; GENETIC-VARIABILITY; BODY
   PIGMENTATION; SIZE DIMORPHISM; MORPHOMETRICAL TRAITS; ISOFEMALE LINES
AB In Drosophila melanogaster male, the last abdominal tergites (A5-A6) are completely dark due to a strong internal constraint while, in female, all abdominal tergites (A2-A7) are phenotypically variable and highly plastic. Male A2-A4 are quite similar to those of female, but their plasticity was never investigated. In this paper, we compared the phenotypic plasticity of A2-A4 in both sexes in order to know if the major dimorphism (SD) expressed in male A5-A6 also extended toward the more anterior segments. We also compared two geographic populations living under very different climates in order to know if adaptive differences, previously observed in females also existed in males. With an isofemale line design, pigmentation variation according to growth temperature was investigated in the two populations from France and India. Male and female data were compared and sexual dimorphism (SD) analyzed in various ways. Reaction norms were quite similar in both sexes for A2 and A3, but clearly different for A4. Considering the total pigmentation (A2 + A3 + A4) males were darker than females at low temperatures and either identical to them (France) or lighter (India) above 25A degrees C. SD (male-female difference) was genetically variable among lines and significantly different among segments. Reaction norms of SD exhibited an overall decrease with temperature and also a significant difference among populations, suggesting a local adaptation of SD to thermal conditions. The three plastic segments in male (A2-A4) seem to react adaptively to the thermal environment more efficiently than the same segments in female, in agreement with the thermal budget hypothesis. To our knowledge, it is the first time that a SD trait exhibits an adaptive difference between geographic populations.
C1 [Gibert, P.] Univ Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5558, Lab Biometrie & Biol Evolut, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France.
   [Moreteau, B.; David, J. R.] CNRS, Lab Evolut Genome & Speciat, F-91198 Gif Sur Yvette, France.
   [Moreteau, B.; David, J. R.] Univ Paris 11, F-91405 Orsay, France.
   [David, J. R.] Museum Natl Hist Nat, Dept Systemat & Evolut, UMR OSEB 5202, F-75005 Paris, France.
C3 Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1; Centre National de la Recherche
   Scientifique (CNRS); CNRS - Institute of Ecology & Environment (INEE);
   VetAgro Sup; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS);
   Universite Paris Saclay; Universite Paris Saclay; Museum National
   d'Histoire Naturelle (MNHN)
RP Gibert, P (corresponding author), Univ Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5558, Lab Biometrie & Biol Evolut, 43 Blvd 11 Novembre 1918, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France.
EM gibert@biomserv.univ-lyon1.fr
OI Gibert, Patricia/0000-0002-9461-6820
CR [Anonymous], 1954, The distribution and abundance of animals, DOI DOI 10.1111/BRV
   [Anonymous], 1998, Melanism: Evolution in Action
   [Anonymous], 1987, Temperature biology of animals
   [Anonymous], 1983, The genetics and biology of Drosophila
   BACHLI G, 1971, LEUCOPHENGA PARALEUC
   BAKER BS, 1980, GENETICS, V94, P383
   CAPY P, 1994, GENET SEL EVOL, V26, P15, DOI 10.1051/gse:19940102
   CAPY P, 1988, HEREDITY, V61, P263, DOI 10.1038/hdy.1988.114
   DAVID JEAN, 1965, BULL BIOL FRANCE BELG, V99, P369
   David JR, 2006, GENETICA, V128, P109, DOI 10.1007/s10709-005-5539-5
   David JR, 2006, J GENET, V85, P9, DOI 10.1007/BF02728965
   David JR, 2005, HEREDITY, V94, P3, DOI 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800562
   David JR, 1997, J THERM BIOL, V22, P441, DOI 10.1016/S0306-4565(97)00063-6
   DAVID JR, 1985, GENET SEL EVOL, V17, P211, DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-17-2-211
   David JR, 2003, J GENET, V82, P79, DOI 10.1007/BF02715810
   DAVID JR, 1988, TRENDS GENET, V4, P106, DOI 10.1016/0168-9525(88)90098-4
   DAVID JR, 1994, GENET SEL EVOL, V26, P229, DOI 10.1051/gse:19940305
   DAVID JR, 1990, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V3, P429, DOI 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1990.3050429.x
   Falconer D.S., 1996, Quantitative Genetics
   Gibert JM, 2007, PLOS GENET, V3, P266, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030030
   Gibert P, 1998, GENET SEL EVOL, V30, P181, DOI 10.1051/gse:19980207
   Gibert P, 1996, EVOLUTION, V50, P2346, DOI [10.2307/2410703, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03622.x]
   Gibert P, 2004, GENETICA, V120, P165, DOI 10.1023/B:GENE.0000017639.62427.8b
   Gibert P, 2004, HEREDITY, V92, P499, DOI 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800449
   Gibert P, 1999, GENETICA, V105, P165, DOI 10.1023/A:1003704315194
   Gibert P, 1998, J GENET, V77, P13, DOI 10.1007/BF02933036
   Gibert P, 2000, EVOL DEV, V2, P249, DOI 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2000.00064.x
   GIBSON AR, 1979, OECOLOGIA, V43, P99
   Hoffman AA, 1991, EVOLUTIONARY GENETIC
   HOFFMANN AA, 1988, GENET SEL EVOL, V20, P87, DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-20-1-87
   Hollocher H, 2000, EVOLUTION, V54, P2046, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb01248.x
   Huey RB, 2006, ZOOLOGY, V109, P318, DOI 10.1016/j.zool.2006.04.003
   Karan D, 1999, GENET SEL EVOL, V31, P491, DOI 10.1051/gse:19990505
   KINGSOLVER JG, 1991, AM NAT, V137, P816, DOI 10.1086/285195
   Klaczko LB, 2006, GENETICA, V126, P43, DOI 10.1007/s10709-005-1431-6
   Kopp A, 2000, NATURE, V408, P553, DOI 10.1038/35046017
   Kopp A, 2003, GENETICS, V163, P771
   Leather SR., 1993, ECOLOGY INSECT OVERW
   Llopart A, 2002, EVOLUTION, V56, P2262
   Moreteau B, 2003, J ZOOL SYST EVOL RES, V41, P64, DOI 10.1046/j.1439-0469.2003.00195.x
   Munjal AK, 1997, GENET SEL EVOL, V29, P601, DOI 10.1051/gse:19970505
   Precht H., 1973, TEMPERATURE LIFE
   Reeve JP, 1999, HEREDITY, V83, P697, DOI 10.1038/sj.hdy.6886160
   Roff Derek A., 1992
   Rohmer C, 2004, J EXP BIOL, V207, P2735, DOI 10.1242/jeb.01087
   True JR, 2003, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V18, P640, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.006
   VIA S, 1984, EVOLUTION, V38, P896, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00360.x
   WATT WB, 1969, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V63, P767, DOI 10.1073/pnas.63.3.767
   Wittkopp PJ, 2003, TRENDS GENET, V19, P495, DOI 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00194-X
NR 49
TC 14
Z9 14
U1 0
U2 14
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 0016-6707
EI 1573-6857
J9 GENETICA
JI Genetica
PD APR
PY 2009
VL 135
IS 3
BP 403
EP 413
DI 10.1007/s10709-008-9286-2
PG 11
WC Genetics & Heredity
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Genetics & Heredity
GA 413ZO
UT WOS:000263833900015
PM 18568431
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Csilléry, K
   Buchmann, N
   Brendel, O
   Gessler, A
   Glauser, A
   Kupferschmid, AD
AF Csillery, Katalin
   Buchmann, Nina
   Brendel, Oliver
   Gessler, Arthur
   Glauser, Alexandra
   Kupferschmid, Andrea Doris
TI Recovery of silver fir (<i>Abies alba</i> Mill.) seedlings from ungulate
   browsing mirrors soil nitrogen availability
SO TREE PHYSIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE herbivory; mountain forests; mycorrhiza; nitrogen; non-structural
   carbohydrates; simulated browsing; stable isotopes; water-use efficiency
ID SPRUCE PICEA-ABIES; CARBON LIMITATION; MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI;
   GENETIC-VARIATION; USE EFFICIENCY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; NORWAY SPRUCE;
   PLANT-GROWTH; DOUGLAS-FIR; TREES
AB Abies alba (Mill.) has a high potential for mitigating climate change in European mountain forests; yet, its natural regeneration is severely limited by ungulate browsing. Here, we simulated browsing in a common garden experiment to study growth and physiological traits, measured from bulk needles, using a randomized block design with two levels of browsing severity and seedlings originating from 19 populations across Switzerland. Genetic factors explained most variation in growth (on average, 51.5%) and physiological traits (10.2%) under control conditions, while heavy browsing considerably reduced the genetic effects on growth (to 30%), but doubled those on physiological traits related to carbon storage. While browsing reduced seedling height, it also lowered seedling water-use efficiency (decreased delta C-13) and increased their delta N-15. Different populations reacted differently to browsing stress, and for seedling height, starch concentration and delta N-15, population differences appeared to be the result of natural selection. First, we found that populations originating from the warmest regions recovered the fastest from browsing stress, and they did so by mobilizing starch from their needles, which suggests a genetic underpinning for a growth-storage trade-off across populations. Second, we found that seedlings originating from mountain populations growing on steep slopes had a higher delta N-15 in the common garden than those originating from flat areas, indicating that they have been selected to grow on N-poor, potentially drained, soils. This finding was corroborated by the fact that nitrogen concentration in adult needles was lower on steep slopes than on flat ground, strongly indicating that steep slopes are the most N-poor environments. These results suggest that adaptation to climate and soil nitrogen availability, as well as ungulate browsing pressure, co-determine the regeneration and range limit of silver fir.
C1 [Csillery, Katalin] Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, Land Change Sci, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
   [Buchmann, Nina] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Agr Sci, Zurich, Switzerland.
   [Brendel, Oliver] Univ Lorraine, UMR Silva, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Nancy, France.
   [Gessler, Arthur] Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, Forest Dynam, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
   [Gessler, Arthur] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Terr Ecosyst, Zurich, Switzerland.
   [Glauser, Alexandra; Kupferschmid, Andrea Doris] Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, Forest Resources & Management, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
   [Csillery, Katalin] Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, Biodivers & Conservat Biol, Zurcherstr 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
C3 Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology Domain; Swiss Federal Institute
   for Forest, Snow & Landscape Research; Swiss Federal Institutes of
   Technology Domain; ETH Zurich; Universite de Lorraine; AgroParisTech;
   INRAE; Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology Domain; Swiss Federal
   Institute for Forest, Snow & Landscape Research; Swiss Federal
   Institutes of Technology Domain; ETH Zurich; Swiss Federal Institutes of
   Technology Domain; Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow & Landscape
   Research; Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology Domain; Swiss Federal
   Institute for Forest, Snow & Landscape Research
RP Csilléry, K (corresponding author), Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, Land Change Sci, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.; Csilléry, K (corresponding author), Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, Biodivers & Conservat Biol, Zurcherstr 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
EM katalin.csillery@wsl.ch
RI Csillery, Katalin/K-4741-2014; Gessler, Arthur/C-7121-2008; Brendel,
   Oliver/B-9266-2013; Buchmann, Nina/E-6095-2011
OI Brendel, Oliver/0000-0003-3252-0273; Kupferschmid, Andrea
   Doris/0000-0003-2113-9792; Csillery, Katalin/0000-0003-0039-9296;
   Buchmann, Nina/0000-0003-0826-2980
FU Internal Innovative Project grant from the Swiss Federal Institute for
   Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL); Marie Sklodowska-Curie
   Individual Fellowship [FORGENET 705972]; Swiss National Science
   Foundation [CRSK-3_190288]; Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
   [CRSK-3_190288] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
FX This research was supported by an Internal Innovative Project grant from
   the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
   (WSL) to A.D.K., K.C., A.Gessler and N.B.. K.C. was supported by a Marie
   Sklodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (FORGENET 705972) and by a Swiss
   National Science Foundation grant (CRSK-3_190288), while analyzing the
   data and writing this manuscript.
CR ALLISON TD, 1990, OECOLOGIA, V83, P523, DOI 10.1007/BF00317204
   [Anonymous], 2010, European ungulates and their management in the 21st century
   [Anonymous], 2013, Int.J. Plant Sci, DOI DOI 10.9734/IJPSS/2013/4233
   Apollonio M, 2017, MAMMAL RES, V62, P209, DOI 10.1007/s13364-017-0321-5
   Aranda I, 2017, TREE PHYSIOL, V37, P938, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpx058
   Battipaglia G, 2009, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V257, P820, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.10.015
   Bréda N, 2006, ANN FOREST SCI, V63, P625, DOI 10.1051/forest:2006042
   Brendel O, 2003, ANN FOREST SCI, V60, P97, DOI 10.1051/forest:2003001
   Brendel O, 2002, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V25, P945, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00872.x
   Butler D.G., 2009, ASReml user guide release 3.0
   Caignard T, 2019, TREE GENET GENOMES, V15, DOI 10.1007/s11295-018-1309-2
   CAMM E, 1993, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V8, P61, DOI 10.1007/BF00240983
   CHAPIN FS, 1980, J ECOL, V68, P189
   Conrad O, 2015, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V8, P1991, DOI 10.5194/gmd-8-1991-2015
   CORNELIUS J, 1994, CAN J FOREST RES, V24, P372, DOI 10.1139/x94-050
   Craine JM, 2015, PLANT SOIL, V396, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11104-015-2542-1
   Csilléry K, 2020, EVOL APPL, V13, P2357, DOI 10.1111/eva.13029
   Csilléry K, 2020, HEREDITY, V124, P77, DOI 10.1038/s41437-019-0240-0
   Cui J, 2020, NEW PHYTOL, V226, P1696, DOI 10.1111/nph.16480
   Day ME, 2011, TREE PHYSIOL-NETH, V4, P91, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1242-3_4
   Donohue K, 2014, EVOLUTION, V68, P32, DOI 10.1111/evo.12284
   Drexhage M, 2003, ANN FOREST SCI, V60, P173, DOI 10.1051/forest:2003010
   Dyderski MK, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P1150, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13925
   Ellenberg H., 1988, Vegetation ecology of Central Europe.
   Endrulat T, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0154687
   ERICSSON A, 1980, J APPL ECOL, V17, P747, DOI 10.2307/2402653
   Falconer D. S., 1989, Introduction to quantitative genetics.
   Frank A, 2017, ECOLOGY, V98, P211, DOI 10.1002/ecy.1632
   Frank D, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P2861, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12916
   Fuchs R, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P299, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12714
   George JP, 2015, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V214, P430, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.08.268
   Gessler A, 2017, NEW PHYTOL, V214, P513, DOI 10.1111/nph.14340
   Gilbert KJ, 2015, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V15, P262, DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12303
   GILL RMA, 1992, FORESTRY, V65, P363, DOI 10.1093/forestry/65.4.363-a
   Grattapaglia D, 2018, FRONT PLANT SCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.01693
   Hansen JK, 2004, EUR J FOR RES, V123, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10342-004-0031-9
   Hansen TF, 2011, EVOL BIOL, V38, P258, DOI 10.1007/s11692-011-9127-6
   HENDERSON CR, 1975, BIOMETRICS, V31, P423, DOI 10.2307/2529430
   Hirobe M, 1998, EUR J SOIL BIOL, V34, P123, DOI 10.1016/S1164-5563(00)88649-5
   Hishi T, 2014, BIOL FERT SOILS, V50, P343, DOI 10.1007/s00374-013-0863-x
   Hobbie EA, 2003, NEW PHYTOL, V157, P115, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00657.x
   Hobbie EA, 2012, NEW PHYTOL, V196, P367, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04300.x
   Hoch G, 2002, OIKOS, V98, P361, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980301.x
   Hoffmann AA, 2016, EVOLUTION, V70, DOI 10.1111/evo.12992
   Högberg P, 2011, NEW PHYTOL, V189, P515, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03485.x
   Höhn M, 2021, MOL ECOL, V30, P5247, DOI 10.1111/mec.16107
   HOOGESTEGER J, 1992, FUNCT ECOL, V6, P317, DOI 10.2307/2389523
   Hu Y, 2022, TREE PHYSIOL, V42, P32, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpab010
   Kahmen A, 2008, OECOLOGIA, V156, P861, DOI 10.1007/s00442-008-1028-8
   Karger DN, 2017, SCI DATA, V4, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2017.122
   Kerr G, 2015, EUR J FOREST RES, V134, P349, DOI 10.1007/s10342-014-0856-9
   Klopcic M, 2017, EUR J FOREST RES, V136, P1071, DOI 10.1007/s10342-017-1052-5
   Körner C, 2003, J ECOL, V91, P4, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00742.x
   Kupferschmid, 2017, UNGULATES EVOLUTION, P1
   Kupferschmid AD, 2019, ECOL EVOL, V9, P3335, DOI 10.1002/ece3.4955
   Latreille AC, 2017, ANN FOREST SCI, V74, DOI 10.1007/s13595-017-0673-7
   Lehtilä K, 2000, OIKOS, V90, P160, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900116.x
   LI B, 1991, FOREST SCI, V37, P613
   Marguerit E, 2014, J EXP BOT, V65, P4757, DOI 10.1093/jxb/eru226
   McDowell N, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V178, P719, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02436.x
   McDowell NG, 2013, NEW PHYTOL, V200, P289, DOI 10.1111/nph.12502
   McDowell NG, 2011, TREE PHYSIOL-NETH, V4, P255, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1242-3_10
   MCNAUGHTON SJ, 1983, OIKOS, V40, P329, DOI 10.2307/3544305
   Merilä J, 2000, AM NAT, V155, P301, DOI 10.1086/303330
   Millard P, 2001, FUNCT ECOL, V15, P535, DOI 10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00541.x
   Millard P, 2010, TREE PHYSIOL, V30, P1083, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpq042
   Moran E, 2017, NEW PHYTOL, V216, P1034, DOI 10.1111/nph.14774
   O'Reilly-Wapstra JM, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V325, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.03.038
   Palacio S, 2008, FUNCT ECOL, V22, P808, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01433.x
   Palacio S, 2014, NEW PHYTOL, V201, P1096, DOI 10.1111/nph.12602
   Pritchard ES, 2005, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V19, P89, DOI 10.1007/s00468-004-0367-2
   Puri E, 2015, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V29, P1187, DOI 10.1007/s00468-015-1199-y
   Quentin AG, 2015, TREE PHYSIOL, V35, P1146, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpv073
   Ramirez JI, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V432, P478, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.09.049
   Rhodes AC, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V89, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.013
   Robinson D, 1998, PLANTA, V205, P397, DOI 10.1007/s004250050336
   Robinson N, 2014, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V87, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.11.002
   Sakai A., 2012, FROST SURVIVAL PLANT, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-71745-1
   Sala A, 2012, TREE PHYSIOL, V32, P764, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpr143
   Schneider S, 1996, NEW PHYTOL, V134, P103, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01150.x
   Schweitzer JA, 2008, ECOLOGY, V89, P773, DOI 10.1890/07-0337.1
   Seidl R, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2842, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02452.x
   Senn J, 2003, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V181, P151, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00129-4
   SMIRNOFF N, 1984, ANN BOT-LONDON, V54, P363, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086806
   SMIRNOFF N, 1985, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V64, P133, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1985.tb02326.x
   Steppe K, 2011, TREE PHYSIOL-NETH, V4, P235, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1242-3_9
   Talluto MV, 2017, NAT ECOL EVOL, V1, DOI 10.1038/s41559-017-0182
   Tanentzap AJ, 2009, J APPL ECOL, V46, P1064, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01683.x
   Tinner W, 2013, ECOL MONOGR, V83, P419, DOI 10.1890/12-2231.1
   Vitali V, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P5108, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13774
   Vitasse Y, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P3781, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14803
   Vitasse Y, 2019, EUR J FOREST RES, V138, P547, DOI 10.1007/s10342-019-01192-4
   Vitasse Y, 2009, CAN J FOREST RES, V39, P1259, DOI 10.1139/X09-054
   Weber R, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V218, P107, DOI 10.1111/nph.14987
   WELKER JM, 1990, FUNCT ECOL, V4, P807, DOI 10.2307/2389447
   Werner RA, 2001, RAPID COMMUN MASS SP, V15, P501, DOI 10.1002/rcm.258
   Whitlock MC, 2008, MOL ECOL, V17, P1885, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03712.x
   Wiley E, 2013, TREE PHYSIOL, V33, P1216, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpt093
   Wiley E, 2012, NEW PHYTOL, V195, P285, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04180.x
   WONG SC, 1990, PHOTOSYNTH RES, V23, P171, DOI 10.1007/BF00035008
   Xu ZH, 2003, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V186, P359, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00304-9
   ZAK DR, 1989, CAN J FOREST RES, V19, P1521, DOI 10.1139/x89-231
NR 102
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 0
U2 19
PU OXFORD UNIV PRESS
PI OXFORD
PA GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND
SN 0829-318X
EI 1758-4469
J9 TREE PHYSIOL
JI Tree Physiol.
PD FEB
PY 2022
VL 42
IS 2
BP 273
EP 288
DI 10.1093/treephys/tpab105
EA OCT 2021
PG 16
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA 2B2NM
UT WOS:000810029400006
PM 34528673
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Hancock, AM
   Clark, VJ
   Qian, YD
   Di Rienzo, A
AF Hancock, Angela M.
   Clark, Vanessa J.
   Qian, Yudong
   Di Rienzo, Anna
TI Population Genetic Analysis of the Uncoupling Proteins Supports a Role
   for <i>UCP3</i> in Human Cold Resistance
SO MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
LA English
DT Article
DE climate; obesity; nonshivering thermogenesis; natural selection;
   evolution
ID BROWN ADIPOSE-TISSUE; RESTING ENERGY-EXPENDITURE; RAT SKELETAL-MUSCLE;
   MESSENGER-RNA EXPRESSION; FATTY-ACID-METABOLISM; DIET-INDUCED OBESITY;
   MIDDLE-AGED HUMANS; CELL-LINE PANEL; HUMAN GENOME; AFRICAN-AMERICAN
AB Production of heat via nonshivering thermogenesis (NST) is critical for temperature homeostasis in mammals. Uncoupling protein UCP1 plays a central role in NST by uncoupling the proton gradients produced in the inner membranes of mitochondria to produce heat; however, the extent to which UCP1 homologues, UCP2 and UCP3, are involved in NST is the subject of an ongoing debate. We used an evolutionary approach to test the hypotheses that variants that are associated with increased expression of these genes (UCP1 -3826A, UCP2 -866A, and UCP3 -55T) show evidence of adaptation with winter climate. To that end, we calculated correlations between allele frequencies and winter climate variables for these single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which we genotyped in a panel of 52 worldwide populations. We found significant correlations with winter climate for UCP1 -3826G/A and UCP3 -55C/T. Further, by analyzing previously published genotype data for these SNPs, we found that the peak of the correlation for the UCP1 region occurred at the disease-associated -3826A/G variant and that the UCP3 region has a striking signal overall, with several individual SNPs showing interesting patterns, including the -55C/T variant. Resequencing of the regions in a set of three diverse population samples helped to clarify the signals that we found with the genotype data. At UCP1, the resequencing data revealed modest evidence that the haplotype carrying the -3826A variant was driven to high frequency by selection. In the UCP3 region, combining results from the climate analysis and resequencing survey suggest a more complex model in which variants on multiple haplotypes may independently be correlated with temperature. This is further supported by an excess of intermediate frequency variants in the UCP3 region in the Han Chinese population. Taken together, our results suggest that adaptation to climate influenced the global distribution of allele frequencies in UCP1 and UCP3 and provide an independent source of evidence for a role in cold resistance for UCP3.
C1 [Hancock, Angela M.; Clark, Vanessa J.; Qian, Yudong; Di Rienzo, Anna] Univ Chicago, Dept Human Genet, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.
C3 University of Chicago
RP Di Rienzo, A (corresponding author), Univ Chicago, Dept Human Genet, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.
EM dirienzo@uchicago.edu
RI Clark, Vanessa/GWC-4145-2022
OI Hancock, Angela/0000-0002-4768-3377; Di Rienzo, Anna/0000-0002-8982-9098
FU National Institutes of Health (NIH) [DK56670, GM79558, GM07197];
   American Heart Association [0710189Z]; American Heart Association (AHA)
   [0710189Z] Funding Source: American Heart Association (AHA)
FX We are grateful to members of the Di Rienzo laboratory for helpful
   discussions about this research, to Molly Przeworski for comments on an
   earlier version of the manuscript, to Richard Hudson for advice on the
   geographic structure analysis, and to two anonymous reviewers for
   helpful comments. This work was supported by National Institutes of
   Health (NIH) Grants DK56670 and GM79558. A. M. H. was supported in part
   by American Heart Association Graduate Fellowship 0710189Z and by NIH
   Genetics and Regulation Training Grant GM07197.
CR Albu J, 1997, AM J CLIN NUTR, V66, P531, DOI 10.1093/ajcn/66.3.531
   ALLISON AC, 1954, BRIT MED J, V1, P290, DOI 10.1136/bmj.1.4857.290
   Argyropoulos G, 1998, J CLIN INVEST, V102, P1345, DOI 10.1172/JCI4115
   Bézaire V, 2001, AM J PHYSIOL-ENDOC M, V281, pE975, DOI 10.1152/ajpendo.2001.281.5.E975
   Bhangale TR, 2006, NAT GENET, V38, P1457, DOI 10.1038/ng1925
   Boss O, 1997, FEBS LETT, V408, P39, DOI 10.1016/S0014-5793(97)00384-0
   Brown AM, 1999, FEBS LETT, V464, P189, DOI 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)01708-1
   Cadenas S, 1999, FEBS LETT, V462, P257, DOI 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)01540-9
   Cann HM, 2002, SCIENCE, V296, P261
   Cannon B, 2004, PHYSIOL REV, V84, P277, DOI 10.1152/physrev.00015.2003
   Choi CS, 2007, J CLIN INVEST, V117, P1995, DOI 10.1172/JCI13579
   Chung WK, 1999, DIABETES, V48, P1890, DOI 10.2337/diabetes.48.9.1890
   Clement K, 1996, INT J OBESITY, V20, P1062
   Cline GW, 2001, J BIOL CHEM, V276, P20240, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M102540200
   Cohen JC, 2004, SCIENCE, V305, P869, DOI 10.1126/science.1099870
   Coop G, 2010, GENETICS, V185, P1411, DOI 10.1534/genetics.110.114819
   Cypess AM, 2009, NEW ENGL J MED, V360, P1509, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa0810780
   Dulloo AG, 2002, FEBS LETT, V515, P109, DOI 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02449-3
   Enerback S, 1997, NATURE, V387, P90, DOI 10.1038/387090a0
   Esterbauer H, 1998, J LIPID RES, V39, P834
   Esterbauer H, 2001, NAT GENET, V28, P178, DOI 10.1038/88911
   Fleury C, 1997, NAT GENET, V15, P269, DOI 10.1038/ng0397-269
   Foster GD, 1997, OBES RES, V5, P1
   Gong DW, 1997, J BIOL CHEM, V272, P24129, DOI 10.1074/jbc.272.39.24129
   Hagen T, 1999, FEBS LETT, V454, P201, DOI 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00811-X
   Haldane J. B. S., 1949, Ricerca Scientifica Suppl, P68
   Halsall DJ, 2001, INT J OBESITY, V25, P472, DOI 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801584
   Hamada T, 2008, METABOLISM, V57, P410, DOI 10.1016/j.metabol.2007.10.019
   Hancock AM, 2008, PLOS GENET, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.0040032
   Hancock AM, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P8924, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0914625107
   Harper JA, 2002, BIOCHEM J, V361, P49, DOI 10.1042/0264-6021:3610049
   Harper ME, 2001, BIOCHEM SOC T, V29, P768, DOI 10.1042/bst0290768
   Hermisson J, 2005, GENETICS, V169, P2335, DOI 10.1534/genetics.104.036947
   Hesselink MKC, 2003, J CLIN INVEST, V111, P479, DOI [10.1172/JCI16653, 10.1172/JCI200316653]
   Himms-Hagen J, 2001, EXP BIOL MED, V226, P78, DOI 10.1177/153537020122600204
   HUDSON RR, 1992, MOL BIOL EVOL, V9, P138
   HUDSON RR, 1994, GENETICS, V136, P1329
   Hudson RR, 2001, GENETICS, V159, P1805
   Hudson RR, 2002, BIOINFORMATICS, V18, P337, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.2.337
   Jakobsson M, 2008, NATURE, V451, P998, DOI 10.1038/nature06742
   Jia JJ, 2009, OBES REV, V10, P519, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00569.x
   Kaplan AS, 1996, J PEDIATR-US, V129, P643, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3476(96)70143-9
   Kimm SYS, 2002, AM J CLIN NUTR, V75, P714, DOI 10.1093/ajcn/75.4.714
   Kistler R, 2001, B AM METEOROL SOC, V82, P247, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<0247:TNNYRM>2.3.CO;2
   Kontani Y, 2005, AGING CELL, V4, P147, DOI 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2005.00157.x
   Krauss S, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P118, DOI 10.1073/pnas.012410699
   Krauss S, 2005, NAT REV MOL CELL BIO, V6, P248, DOI 10.1038/nrm1592
   Krempler F, 2002, DIABETES, V51, P3331, DOI 10.2337/diabetes.51.11.3331
   Kudaravalli S, 2008, THESIS U CHICAGO CHI
   KUSHNER RF, 1995, OBES RES, V3, pS261, DOI 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1995.tb00472.x
   Lakoski SG, 2009, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V94, P2537, DOI 10.1210/jc.2009-0141
   Lanni A, 1999, FEBS LETT, V444, P250, DOI 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00061-7
   Lanouette CM, 2002, J APPL PHYSIOL, V92, P1111, DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.00726.2001
   Larkin S, 1997, BIOCHEM BIOPH RES CO, V240, P222, DOI 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7636
   Leonard WR, 2005, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V34, P451, DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120558
   Li B, 2000, NAT MED, V6, P1115, DOI 10.1038/80450
   Li JZ, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P1100, DOI 10.1126/science.1153717
   Liu H, 2006, AM J HUM GENET, V79, P230, DOI 10.1086/505436
   Liu YJ, 2005, PHYSIOL GENOMICS, V22, P197, DOI 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00031.2005
   LIVINGSTONE FB, 1964, AM J HUM GENET, V16, P435
   Matsushita H, 2003, MATURITAS, V45, P39, DOI 10.1016/S0378-5122(03)00088-4
   Morrison JA, 1996, J PEDIATR-US, V129, P637, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3476(96)70142-7
   Nagai N, 2003, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V88, P5661, DOI 10.1210/jc.2003-030672
   Nau K, 2008, J COMP PHYSIOL B, V178, P269, DOI 10.1007/s00360-007-0219-7
   Nicolae DL, 2010, PLOS GENET, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000888
   Nielsen R, 2007, NAT REV GENET, V8, P857, DOI 10.1038/nrg2187
   Novembre J, 2009, NAT REV GENET, V10, P745, DOI 10.1038/nrg2632
   Orr HA, 2001, GENETICS, V157, P875
   Paulik MA, 1998, PHARM RES-DORDR, V15, P944, DOI 10.1023/A:1011993019385
   Pennings PS, 2006, PLOS GENET, V2, P1998, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020186
   Pennings PS, 2006, MOL BIOL EVOL, V23, P1076, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msj117
   Pluzhnikov A, 2002, GENETICS, V161, P1209
   Pritchard JK, 2010, CURR BIOL, V20, pR208, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.055
   Przeworski M, 2005, EVOLUTION, V59, P2312, DOI 10.1554/05-273.1
   Ramachandran S, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P15942, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0507611102
   Roberts D.F., 1978, CLIMATE HUMAN VARIAB, VSecond
   Romeo S, 2007, NAT GENET, V39, P513, DOI 10.1038/ng1984
   Romeo S, 2009, J CLIN INVEST, V119, P70, DOI 10.1172/JCI37118
   Rosenberg NA, 2006, ANN HUM GENET, V70, P841, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2006.00285.x
   Saito M, 2009, DIABETES, V58, P1526, DOI 10.2337/db09-0530
   Schaffner SF, 2005, GENOME RES, V15, P1576, DOI 10.1101/gr.3709305
   Schrauwen P, 1999, INT J OBESITY, V23, P1242, DOI 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801057
   Schrauwen P, 2006, PROG LIPID RES, V45, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.plipres.2005.11.001
   Schrauwen P, 1999, DIABETES, V48, P146, DOI 10.2337/diabetes.48.1.146
   SIMOONS FJ, 1970, AM J DIG DIS, V15, P695, DOI 10.1007/BF02235991
   Slatter TL, 2008, CLIN GENET, V73, P179, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00940.x
   Snodgrass JJ, 2007, AM J HUM BIOL, V19, P165, DOI 10.1002/ajhb.20624
   Stephens M, 2001, AM J HUM GENET, V68, P978, DOI 10.1086/319501
   Stuart JA, 2001, J BIOL CHEM, V276, P18633, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M011566200
   Su AI, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P6062, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0400782101
   TAJIMA F, 1989, GENETICS, V123, P585
   Tishkoff SA, 2007, NAT GENET, V39, P31, DOI 10.1038/ng1946
   Virtanen KA, 2009, NEW ENGL J MED, V360, P1518, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa0808949
   Voight BF, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P18508, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0507325102
   WATTERSON GA, 1975, THEOR POPUL BIOL, V7, P256, DOI 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9
   Weyer C, 1999, AM J CLIN NUTR, V70, P13
   Wijers SLJ, 2009, OBES REV, V10, P218, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00538.x
   Wong WW, 1999, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V84, P906, DOI 10.1210/jc.84.3.906
   Yanovski SZ, 1997, OBES RES, V5, P321, DOI 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1997.tb00558.x
NR 99
TC 48
Z9 58
U1 0
U2 15
PU OXFORD UNIV PRESS
PI OXFORD
PA GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND
SN 0737-4038
J9 MOL BIOL EVOL
JI Mol. Biol. Evol.
PD JAN
PY 2011
VL 28
IS 1
BP 601
EP 614
DI 10.1093/molbev/msq228
PG 14
WC Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Evolutionary Biology; Genetics &
   Heredity
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Evolutionary Biology; Genetics &
   Heredity
GA 696CD
UT WOS:000285418600058
PM 20802238
OA Green Published, Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Gangwisch, M
   Matzarakis, A
AF Gangwisch, Marcel
   Matzarakis, Andreas
TI Composition of factors for local heat adaptation measures at the local
   level in cities of the mid-latitude - An approach for the south-west of
   Germany
SO ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Heat health warning system; Heat health action plan; Urban heat island
   analysis; Iso-area analysis; Recommendation for action
ID HUMAN THERMAL COMFORT; URBAN GREEN SPACES; CLIMATE; SYSTEM; ISLAND;
   PALM; RELEVANCE; STRESS; INDOOR; HEALTH
AB Traditional heat health warning systems focus on severe and extreme heat events at the district or regional level, often overlooking localized risk and protective factors such as healthcare access and urban green spaces. This approach considers less the varying impacts of heat within cities, including the phenomenon of Urban Heat Islands (UHIs) and the diverse needs of different populations. To address these shortcomings, a need for the development of an Urban Heat Health Warning and Information System (UHHWIS) that operates within the framework of Heat Health Action Plans is needed. Such a system integrates national acute heat health warnings with city-specific assessments of UHI effects and other relevant factors. The technical implementation of the UHHWIS involves the calculation and preprocessing of basic factors such as the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), imperviousness, and UHI intensity. Additionally, further factors are assessed, spatially processed, and provided in accordance with Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) standards. An iso-area analysis is conducted to evaluate the accessibility of protective factors, such as urban green spaces, drinking wells, hospitals, physicians, and pharmacies, based on the city 's road topology. One crucial factor considered in the system is the casting of shadows, which is influenced by both time and location and facilitated through deck.gl. The developed template encompasses all these components into a unified system aimed at protecting vulnerable and risk groups, such as the elderly, through resilient, climate-adapted urban planning. The system provides warnings and information tailored to the urban morphology and prevailing conditions, complemented by a catalogue of potential short- to long-term measures focused on behavioral changes and climate-resilient urban planning strategies. The template can be adapted for use in various European cities, offering valuable insights to decision-makers in city administration for mitigating thermal stress and enhancing resilience against urban heat nowadays and in future.
C1 [Gangwisch, Marcel] German Meteorol Serv, Res Ctr Human Biometeorol, Stefan Meier Str 4, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany.
   [Gangwisch, Marcel; Matzarakis, Andreas] Univ Freiburg, Inst Earth & Environm Sci, Fac Environm & Nat Resources, Chair Environm Meteorol, Werthmannstr 10, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany.
   [Matzarakis, Andreas] Democritus Univ Thrace, Komotini 69100, Greece.
C3 Deutscher Wetterdienst; University of Freiburg; Democritus University of
   Thrace
RP Gangwisch, M (corresponding author), German Meteorol Serv, Res Ctr Human Biometeorol, Stefan Meier Str 4, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany.
EM marcel.gangwisch@saturn.uni-freiburg.de
RI Matzarakis, Andreas/AAO-2676-2021
FU (Zentrum fr Luft-und Raumfahrt e.V.); Federal Ministry of Ed-ucation and
   Research of Germany (Das Bundesministerium fr Bildung und
   Forschung-BMBF) [01LR1726C]
FX We want to thank the German Aerospace Center (Das DeutscheZentrum fur
   Luft-und Raumfahrt e.V.) and the Federal Ministry of Education and
   Research of Germany (Das Bundesministerium fur Bildung und
   Forschung-BMBF) for providing the financial support (GrueneLunge
   project-funding reference number 01LR1726C, https://
   www.projekt-gruenelunge.de/, last access: 01 April 2024) . The project
   is part of the Zukunftsstadt program (https://
   www.innovationsplattform-zukunfts-stadt.de/, last access: 01 April 2024)
   .r Zentrum fur Luft-und Raumfahrt e.V.) and the Federal Ministry of
   Ed-ucation and Research of Germany (Das Bundesministerium fur Bildung
   und Forschung-BMBF) for providing the financial support (GruneLunge
   project-funding reference number 01LR1726C, https://
   www.projekt-gruenelunge.de/, last access: 01 April 2024) . The project
   is part of the Zukunftsstadt program (https://
   www.innovationsplattform-zukunfts-stadt.de/, last access: 01 April 2024)
   .
CR [Anonymous], 2017, Urban green spaces: a brief for action
   Arnberger A, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V21, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.012
   Astell-Burt T, 2014, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-292
   Beermann B., 2013, Klimaanpassung fur die Stadt Karlsruhe. Stadtebaulicher Rahmenplan
   Beermann B., 2014, Klimaanpssung fur die Stadt Karlsruhe (Teil II)
   Benmarhnia T, 2015, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V26, P781, DOI 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000375
   Blattner B., 2023, Arbeitshilfe zur Entwicklung und Implementierung eines Hitzeaktionsplans fur Stadte und Kommunen
   Briegel F, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101359
   Bund/Lander Ad-hoc Arbeitsgruppe Gesundheitliche Anpassung an die Folgendes Klimawandels (GAK), 2017, Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz, V60, P662, DOI [10.1007/s00103-017-2554-5, DOI 10.1007/S00103-017-2554-5]
   Casanueva A, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16152657
   Cassivi A, 2019, INT J HYG ENVIR HEAL, V222, P1011, DOI 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.06.011
   Chevance G, 2024, SLEEP MED REV, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.smrv.2024.101915
   Clarke J., 2001, Energy Simulation in Building Design, P64, DOI [10.1016/B978-075065082-3/50003-6, DOI 10.1016/B978-075065082-3/50003-6]
   de Freitas CR, 2015, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V59, P109, DOI 10.1007/s00484-014-0819-3
   Deutscher Wetterdienst, 2023, Temperature: multi-year averages 1981-2010
   Deutscher Wetterdienst, 2023, Technical Report
   Deutscher Wetterdienst, 2023, Precipitation: multi-year averages 1981-2010
   Dwyer IJ, 2022, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V66, P1915, DOI 10.1007/s00484-022-02326-x
   EEA, 2018, Copernicus Land Monitoring Service. Corine Land Cover
   Eingruber N., 2023, EMS ANUAL M 2023, DOI [10.5194/ems2023-525, DOI 10.5194/EMS2023-525]
   Enssle F, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V109, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.008
   Ermida SL, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12091471
   Farkas JZ, 2023, HELIYON, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13406
   Ferrini F., 2017, Routledge handbook of urban forestry
   Fröhlich D, 2020, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V13, P3055, DOI 10.5194/gmd-13-3055-2020
   Gangwisch M, 2024, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/atmos15010125
   Gangwisch M, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101624
   Gebhardt H., 2016, Klimawandel in BadenWurttemberg: FaktenFolgen - Perspektiven, V4
   Geofabrik GmbH, 2018, Geofabrik Download Server
   Hackenbruch J., 2018, Wissenschaftliche Berichte des Instituts fur Meteorologie und Klimaforschung des Karlsruher Instituts fur Technologie
   Jendritzky G., 2000, The Perceived Temperature: The method of the Deutscher Wetterdienst for the assessment of cold stress and heat load for the human body
   Jones H. G., 1992, Plants and microclimate: a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology.
   Katavoutas G, 2015, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V59, P205, DOI 10.1007/s00484-014-0836-2
   Konijnendijk CC, 2023, J FORESTRY RES, V34, P821, DOI 10.1007/s11676-022-01523-z
   Matthies F., 2008, HEAT HLTH ACTION PLA
   Matzarakis A, 2008, GEFAHRST REINHALT L, V68, P334
   Matzarakis A, 2017, GEFAHRST REINHALT L, V77, P316
   Matzarakis A., 2021, Urban Microclim. Model. Comf. Energy Stud, P339, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-65421-4_16, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-65421-4_16]
   Matzarakis A, 2022, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/atmos13020226
   Matzarakis A, 2021, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/atmos12050546
   Matzarakis A, 2020, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/atmos11020170
   Matzarakis A, 2009, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V98, P209, DOI 10.1007/s00704-009-0102-4
   McGregor G.R., 2015, Heatwaves and health: guidance on warning-system development
   McLoughlin N, 2023, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V14, DOI 10.1002/wcc.819
   Monteith J.L., 2013, Principles of Environmental Physics, P422, DOI [10.1016/C2010-0-66393-0, DOI 10.1016/C2010-0-66393-0]
   Mucke H.G., 2020, Public Health Forum, V28, P29, DOI [10.1515/pubhef-2020-0001, DOI 10.1515/PUBHEF-2020-0001]
   Muhlemann J., 2023, i18next: Internationalization-framework written in and for JavaScript
   Obrecht C, 2015, ENVIRON FLUID MECH, V15, P753, DOI 10.1007/s10652-014-9381-0
   Oke T. R., 2017, Urban Climates, DOI [10.1017/9781139016476, DOI 10.1017/9781139016476]
   OpenAI, 2023, ChatGPT-4 conversation
   OpenJS Foundation, 2023, Home - deck.gl
   OpenJS Foundation, 2023, OpenJS Foundation
   Pacifici M., 2021, Urban Microclimate Modelling for Comfort and Energy Studies, P293, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-65421-414, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-65421-414]
   Pan XF, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15092051
   Parsons LA, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-27328-y
   Pfafferott J, 2008, BAUPHYSIK, V30, P237, DOI 10.1002/bapi.200810031
   Pfeifer S., 2021, Klimaausblick Karlsruhe und Angrenzende Landkreise
   Raasch S, 2001, METEOROL Z, V10, P363, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2001/0010-0363
   Resler J, 2021, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V14, P4797, DOI 10.5194/gmd-14-4797-2021
   Revi A, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P535
   Rubel F, 2010, METEOROL Z, V19, P135, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2010/0430
   Salloum S., 2016, Int. J. Data Sci. Anal, V1, P145, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S41060-016-0027-9, 10.1007/s41060-016-0027-9]
   Santamouris M, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V512, P582, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.060
   Schlunzen K.H., 2023, Guidance on measuring, modelling and monitoring the canopy layer urban heat island (CL-UHI), V1292
   Stadt Freiburg im Breisgau Stadtplanungsamt, 2019, Ein Entwicklungskonzept fur das Handlungsfeld,,Hitze
   Stadt Karlsruhe Umwelt-und Arbeitsschutz, 2021, Klimaanpassungsstrategie 2021 Teil 2: Umsetzungsstand der Massnahmen und Ausblick. Monitoringbericht und 1. Fortschreibung
   Stadt Wien, 2022, Technical Report
   Staiger H, 2019, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/atmos10010018
   Staiger H, 2012, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V56, P165, DOI 10.1007/s00484-011-0409-6
   Statistisches Landesamt Baden-Wurttemberg, 2020, Bevolkerung, Gebiet und Bevolkerungsdichte
   Sulzer M, 2023, BUILD ENVIRON, V234, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110077
   Takahashi N, 2015, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V12, P3188, DOI 10.3390/ijerph120303188
   The Linux Foundation, 2023, Linux Foundation - Decentralized innovation, built with trust
   Toparlar Y, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V80, P1613, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.248
   Troosters T, 1999, EUR RESPIR J, V14, P270, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14b06.x
   United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division., 2019, STESASERA420 UN POP
   Urban Computing Foundation, 2023, Urban Computing Foundation
   Vandentorren S, 2006, EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH, V16, P583, DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckl063
   Varquez ACG, 2021, SCI DATA, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41597-021-00850-w
   VDI, 2021, VDI 3787, Part 2: Environmental Meteorology, Methods for the human biometeorological evaluation of climate and air quality for urban and regional planning at regional level
   Wagner A., 2013, Zukunftige Klimaentwicklungen in Baden-Wurttemberg: Perspektiven aus regionalen Klimamodellen
   Wang Y, 2019, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1910.08865
   Wienert U, 2005, METEOROL Z, V14, P677, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0069
   World Bank, 2022, World Bank Open Data online
   World Meteorological Organization, 2017, 1 MULT EARL WARN C
   Wüstemann H, 2017, RAUMFORSCH RAUMORDN, V75, P429, DOI 10.1007/s13147-017-0485-0
   Yap W, 2023, SCI DATA, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41597-023-02578-1
   Yap W, 2022, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101825
   Zhou B, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-04242-2
   Zielo B, 2018, GESUNDHEITSWESEN, V80, pE34, DOI 10.1055/s-0043-107874
NR 90
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 10
U2 13
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0160-4120
EI 1873-6750
J9 ENVIRON INT
JI Environ. Int.
PD MAY
PY 2024
VL 187
AR 108718
DI 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108718
EA MAY 2024
PG 16
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA TJ9A8
UT WOS:001241001700001
PM 38735079
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Nguru, W
   Abera, W
   Ouedraogo, I
   Chege, C
   Kane, B
   Bougouma, K
   Mwongera, C
AF Nguru, Wilson
   Abera, Wuletawu
   Ouedraogo, Issa
   Chege, Christine
   Kane, Babacar
   Bougouma, Katiana
   Mwongera, Caroline
TI Spatial estimation of flood residual water cultivation (FRWC) potential
   for food security in S′edhiou and Tambacounda regions of Senegal
SO AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Water management; Climate smart agriculture; Geographical information
   system (GIS); Normalized difference water index (NDWI); Nutritional
   security; Economic empowerment
ID CLIMATE-SMART AGRICULTURE; CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE; USE EFFICIENCY;
   WEST-AFRICA; NUTRITION; IMPACTS
AB Nearly 90% of farming households in Senegal rely on rainfed agriculture; in recent years, climate change-induced disruptions to rainfall patterns and the ensuing depletion of water resources have had adverse effects on agri-cultural production, livelihoods, and food security. Recent studies recommend further assessment of the viability of and potential for Flood Residual Water Cultivation (FRWC) as an alternative growing strategy (i.e., to sup-plement or extend natural growing seasons). This study utilizes satellite imagery, GIS mapping, and crop analysis to identify areas with high potential for FRWC in Senegal's Se & PRIME;dhiou and Tambacounda regions, and recommends key crops that can be grown using FRWC and support food security. By calculating the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) values based on historical data for the rainy season (September) and the first dry month after the rainy season (November) over a 9-year period, areas with flooding potential were identified and mapped. To assess the crop-growing potential for these mapped areas, we used crop reference evapotranspiration (ET) and determined daily water requirements for the select crops included in our analyses. Results: indicated suitable FRWC areas along river valleys in both regions, with specific locations identified along the Gambia River, the Senegal River in the Bakel Department, and low-lying plains near Kidira and Gourel Bouri. It was observed that regions closer to the Sahara Desert required more water for crop production due to higher temperatures and evapotranspiration rates. Our study identified a total potential FRWC area of 20.7 km2 and recommends short-duration crops like okra, French beans, and drought-tolerant crops such as sorghum for FRWC. The integration of FRWC with climate-smart management practices can aid in climate adaptation and economic empowerment in the studied regions, and in Sub-Saharan Africa at large.
C1 [Nguru, Wilson; Chege, Christine; Mwongera, Caroline] Alliance Biovers Int & Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Duduville Campus Kasarani Rd POB 823-00621, Nairobi, Kenya.
   [Abera, Wuletawu] Alliance Biovers Int & Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, c o ILRI,POB 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
   [Ouedraogo, Issa; Kane, Babacar] Alliance Biovers Int & Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Dakar, Senegal.
   [Bougouma, Katiana] MPH, Res & Commun Consultant, Frederick, MD 21703 USA.
RP Nguru, W (corresponding author), Alliance Biovers Int & Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Duduville Campus Kasarani Rd POB 823-00621, Nairobi, Kenya.
EM wilson.maina@cgiar.org
RI Abera, Wuletawu/JBS-3008-2023
OI Abera, Wuletawu/0000-0002-3657-5223
FU Global Affairs Canada (GAC) [P005390]; Mennonite Economic Development
   Associates (MEDA)
FX This article was written as part of the project activities for the
   Adaptation and Valorization of Entrepreneurship in Irrigated Agriculture
   (AVENIR) project (Tambacounda and Sedhiou Regions, Senegal). The AVENIR
   project was funded by Global Affairs Canada (GAC, Project No. P005390)
   and implemented by the International Center for Tropical Agriculture
   (CIAT) in collaboration with Mennonite Economic Development Associates
   (MEDA) . We thank Katiana Bougouma, Derek Linzey, and Courtney Jallo for
   the content review and copyediting of the manuscript.
CR Adhikari R., 2008, Himalayan Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, V3, P86, DOI [DOI 10.3126/HJSA.V3I0.1498, 10.3126/HJSA.V3I0.1498]
   Allen R.G., 2020, CROP EVAPOTRANSPIRAT
   [Anonymous], 2000, Dietary Guidelines for Americans
   [Anonymous], 2012, STATE WORLD FISHERIE, P1
   Asafu-Adjaye J, 2014, J AFR ECON, V23, P17, DOI 10.1093/jae/eju011
   Ba M. N., 2016, Agricultural Sciences, V7, P549
   Balana BB, 2019, AGR SYST, V173, P536, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.021
   Barron J., 2007, WATER POVERTY LINKAG
   Bewket W., 2015, AGR ADAPTATION I RES
   Brosseau A, 2021, AGR SYST, V193, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103211
   Camara M., 2008, REVUES CIRAD FR
   Conti MV, 2019, NUTR REV, V77, P817, DOI 10.1093/nutrit/nuz038
   Das TK, 2016, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V154, P1327, DOI 10.1017/S0021859615001264
   Deng XP, 2006, AGR WATER MANAGE, V80, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.021
   Diome F., 2015, INT J CHEM, V7, P198, DOI [10.5539/ijc.v7n2p198, DOI 10.5539/IJC.V7N2P198]
   Du L., 2014, LEVERAGING AGR NUTRI
   Dumanski J., 2006, Proc of World Association for Soil and Water Conservation, V7, P58
   Eccel E, 2012, METEOROL APPL, V19, P118, DOI 10.1002/met.258
   Evans RG, 2008, WATER RESOUR RES, V44, DOI 10.1029/2007WR006200
   Fall ACAL, 2014, SOIL RES, V52, P671, DOI 10.1071/SR14033
   Fall T., 2016, THESIS VIRGINIA TECH
   FAO, 2021, HARN POW RAIN
   Fiorentino M, 2016, NUTRIENTS, V8, DOI 10.3390/nu8100650
   Fitton N, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101944
   Gao HH, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V651, P484, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.105
   German LA, 2020, WORLD DEV, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105018
   Glatzel Katrin., 2018, What Can We Learn from Rising Rice Production in Senegal? | IFPRI: International Food Policy Research Institute
   Gosling SN, 2016, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V134, P371, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0853-x
   Guarino L., 1997, PROMOT CONSERV USE N, V51
   Hane Maoudo, 2020, International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, V14, P3400, DOI 10.4314/ijbcs.v14i9.34
   Jha PK, 2021, AGR SYST, V190, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103107
   Karuku G.N., 2018, INT J AGRON AGR RES, V12, P116
   Koudahe K., 2017, Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, V7, P476, DOI 10.4236/acs.2017.74035
   Lo YT, 2009, ASIA PAC J CLIN NUTR, V18, P598
   Maestre M, 2017, FOOD POLICY, V68, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.12.007
   Mané I, 2021, FOOD SCI NUTR, V9, P1614, DOI 10.1002/fsn3.2136
   McFeeters SK, 1996, INT J REMOTE SENS, V17, P1425, DOI 10.1080/01431169608948714
   Namara RE, 2010, AGR WATER MANAGE, V97, P520, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.05.007
   Netherlands Enterprise Agency, 2021, SEN VAL CHAIN STUD V
   Parihar CM, 2017, AGR WATER MANAGE, V192, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.07.021
   Partey ST, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V158, P61, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2239-6
   Partey ST, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V187, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.199
   Piraux J., 2015, B LAPAD, DOI [10.4000/APAD.230Pixalytics, DOI 10.4000/APAD.230PIXALYTICS]
   Riaz F., 2020, Environ. Clim. Plant Veg. Growth, V323, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-49732-3_13, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-49732-3_13]
   Sall M, 2020, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/atmos11111192
   Sane Y, 2018, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V18, P1849, DOI 10.5194/nhess-18-1849-2018
   Schewe J, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3245, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1222460110
   Seo KW, 2023, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V50, DOI 10.1029/2023GL103509
   Sibhatu KT, 2018, FOOD SECUR, V10, P47, DOI 10.1007/s12571-017-0762-3
   Sidhu R.S., 2010, J AGR, V65
   Snow T.E., 2013, DECENTRALIZED MANAGE
   Stott P, 2016, SCIENCE, V352, P1517, DOI 10.1126/science.aaf7271
   Taddese G, 2001, ENVIRON MANAGE, V27, P815, DOI 10.1007/s002670010190
   Taylor M, 2018, J PEASANT STUD, V45, P89, DOI 10.1080/03066150.2017.1312355
   The World Bank, 2020, SEN CLIM
   Thiam S, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104191
   Todzo S, 2020, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V11, P319, DOI 10.5194/esd-11-319-2020
   Tour? A.K., 2020, AM J RURAL DEV, V8, P1, DOI [10.12691/ajrd-8-1-1, DOI 10.12691/AJRD-8-1-1]
   USAID, 2011, CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPT
   USAID-KAVES, 2015, FRENCH BEAN VAL CHAI
   Wesolowski A, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P11887, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1504964112
   Xiang KY, 2020, AGR WATER MANAGE, V232, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106043
   Zotarelli L., 2021, STEP STEP CALCULATIO
NR 63
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 2
U2 7
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0378-3774
EI 1873-2283
J9 AGR WATER MANAGE
JI Agric. Water Manage.
PD SEP 1
PY 2023
VL 287
AR 108445
DI 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108445
EA JUL 2023
PG 18
WC Agronomy; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Water Resources
GA O4WM0
UT WOS:001043832500001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Goonesekera, SM
   Olazabal, M
AF Goonesekera, Sascha M.
   Olazabal, Marta
TI Climate adaptation indicators and metrics: State of local policy
   practice
SO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptation metrics; Adaptation indicators; Monitoring and evaluation;
   Learning; Local climate policy
ID TRACKING
AB Recent systematic reviews show that, overall, and across governance levels and sectors, climate change adap-tation monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems are rarely programmed and implemented. As a result, there is a generalized lack of knowledge and practice regarding the definition and use of adaptation indicators and metrics from which to effectively learn. This paper focuses on understanding the emergent state of practice regarding adaptation indicators and metrics at the local level: what indicators and metrics are used? What aspects of the adaptation process are they measuring? How will they be monitored, evaluated, and reported? Out of a sample of the largest 136 coastal cities worldwide, only 59 cities have adaptation-related plans and only 11 (Athens, Auckland, Barcelona, Glasgow, Lima, Montreal, Nagoya, New York City, Portland, Tokyo, and Vancouver) list indicators and metrics. Sourced from these documents, we compile and code a total of 1971 indicators, of which 1841 focus fully or partially on adaptation-related aspects. We study the level of detail (objective, indicator, metric), type (target, input, output, outcome, or impact), scale, dimension, units of measurement, target, and proposed monitoring timeframe, among other aspects. Data shows that current adaptation measurement frameworks are tied to the degree to which each city integrates and addresses adaptation in its policies. A majority of adaptation indicators and metrics measure outputs, i.e. implementation aspects. Outcome indicators are generally connected to users or beneficiaries of adaptation measures and impact indicators are mostly related to health (e.g. hospitalizations). Targets and monitoring timeframes, as well as data sources, are rarely defined. We connect this to a lack of definition of local adaptation goals and a poor understanding of how specific adaptation actions lead to vulnerability reductions and resilience increases. Based on the identified gaps, we propose a metric development guiding framework to stimulate discussion around effective and feasible ap-proaches to measure adaptation progress based on improved adaptation decision-making. We argue, that our results should fuel a critical revision of current adaptation planning practices that might ultimately facilitate processes of learning, experimentation and innovation in this embryonic field.
C1 [Goonesekera, Sascha M.] Univ Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
   [Olazabal, Marta] Basque Ctr Climate Change, BC3, Leioa, Spain.
   [Olazabal, Marta] IKERBASQUE, Basque Fdn Sci, Bilbao, Spain.
   [Olazabal, Marta] Univ Basque Country, Basque Ctr Climate Change, BC3, Sci Campus,Sede Bldg 1,1st Floor, Leioa 48940, Spain.
C3 University of Groningen; Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3); Basque
   Foundation for Science; University of Basque Country; Basque Centre for
   Climate Change (BC3)
RP Olazabal, M (corresponding author), Univ Basque Country, Basque Ctr Climate Change, BC3, Sci Campus,Sede Bldg 1,1st Floor, Leioa 48940, Spain.
EM marta.olazabal@bc3research.org
RI Olazabal, Marta/AFT-6957-2022
FU AXA Research Fund; Maria de Maeztu excellence accreditation 2018-2022;
   Basque Government through the BERC 2022-2025 program;  [4771]; 
   [MDM-2017-0714];  [MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/]
FX This study was funded by AXA Research Fund under Grant Agreement No.
   4771. This research was also supported by Maria de Maeztu excellence
   accreditation 2018-2022 (Ref. MDM-2017-0714), funded by
   MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/; and by the Basque Government through
   the BERC 2022-2025 program.
CR Adaptation Committee, 2021, APPR REW OV PROGR MA
   Arnott JC, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P383, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.017
   Brooks N., 2014, IIED BRIEFING PAPERS
   C40, 2019, MEAS PROGR URB CLIM
   Christiansen L., 2018, ADAPTATION METRICS P, V1
   Coger T., 2021, Working paper, DOI [10.46830/wriwp.20.00060, DOI 10.46830/WRIWP.20.00060]
   Dilling L., 2019, NATURE CLIM CHANGE, V9
   Donatti CI, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V158, P413, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02565-9
   Eriksen S, 2021, WORLD DEV, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105383
   Feldmeyer D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11102931
   Ford JD, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P967, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2744
   Ford JD, 2016, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V21, P839, DOI 10.1007/s11027-014-9627-7
   Göpfert C, 2020, CITY ENVIRON INTERAC, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.cacint.2020.100052
   Haasnoot M, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V52, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.003
   Hale TN, 2021, CLIM POLICY, V21, P406, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2020.1828796
   Hallegatte S, 2019, CLIM RISK MANAG, V23, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2018.12.001
   Harley M., 2008, CLIMATE CHANGE VULNE, P37
   Heidrich O, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V168, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.043
   Hughes S, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P1085, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-00953-z
   Klostermann J, 2018, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V23, P187, DOI 10.1007/s11027-015-9678-4
   Landauer M, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V62, P741, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2018.1430022
   Leiter T., 2019, ADAPTATION METRICS C, P1
   Leiter T., 2018, Pitfalls and potential of measuring climate change adaptation through adaptation metrics
   Leiter T, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V125, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.017
   Lewis W., 2021, BC3 POLICY BRIEFINGS
   Magnan AK, 2016, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V7, P646, DOI 10.1002/wcc.409
   Magnan AK, 2016, NATURE, V530, P160, DOI 10.1038/530160d
   Michaelowa A., 2018, ADAPTATION METRICS P, V1, P29
   Michaelowa A., 2018, DEV UNIVERSAL METRIC, DOI [10.5167/uzh-159652, DOI 10.5167/UZH-159652]
   Moser S.C., 2013, SUCCESSFUL ADAPTATIO, P1
   Mutimba S., 2019, KENYAS MONITORING EV, V8
   Olazabal M, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V206, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103974
   Olazabal M, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab5532
   Olazabal M, 2019, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V11, P277, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2019.1583234
   Olhoff A, 2018, RESILIENCE: THE SCIENCE OF ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE, P51, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-811891-7.00004-9
   Pearce-Higgins JW, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108690
   Salehi S, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V96, P521, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3551-1
   Schneiderbauer S, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V67, P1059, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9919-0
   Scott H, 2022, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V65, P650, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2021.1902789
   Sharifi A, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V750, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141642
   Sharifi A, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V276, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122813
   Singh C, 2022, CLIM DEV, V14, P650, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2021.1964937
   Solecki W, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V163, P1815, DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02947-4
   Tompkins EL, 2018, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V9, DOI 10.1002/wcc.545
   Tyler S, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P420, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.08.004
   UNFCCC, 2021, RAZ ZER
   Ürge-Vorsatz D, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P174, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0100-6
NR 47
TC 15
Z9 15
U1 5
U2 25
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1470-160X
EI 1872-7034
J9 ECOL INDIC
JI Ecol. Indic.
PD DEC
PY 2022
VL 145
AR 109657
DI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109657
EA NOV 2022
PG 10
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 6I6FN
UT WOS:000886224100004
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Ademe, D
   Ziatchik, BF
   Tesfaye, K
   Simane, B
   Alemayehu, G
   Adgo, E
AF Ademe, Dereje
   Ziatchik, Benjamin F.
   Tesfaye, Kindie
   Simane, Belay
   Alemayehu, Getachew
   Adgo, Enyew
TI Climate trends and variability at adaptation scale: Patterns and
   perceptions in an agricultural region of the Ethiopian Highlands
SO WEATHER AND CLIMATE EXTREMES
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptation; Climate change; Climate variability; Mann-Kendal test; Sens'
   slope; Trend analysis
ID BLUE NILE/ABAY HIGHLANDS; RAINFALL VARIABILITY; PRECIPITATION DATA;
   RIVER-BASIN; TIME-SERIES; TEMPERATURE; DROUGHT; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION;
   PHOTOSYNTHESIS; RESILIENCE
AB Analysis of climate variability and trends frequently takes place at large scale. For agricultural applications, however, highly localized climate conditions can be critically important. This certainly applies to tropical highland regions, where dissected topography and convectively dominated precipitation processes can lead to strong variability in both mean climate conditions and year-to-year climate variability. This study examines recent climate variability and trends (1981-2016) on Choke Mountain, located in the western Ethiopian Highlands. Through analysis of precipitation and temperature records at monitored locations, we explore observed variability in climate patterns and trends across sites and seasons. The lens for our spatial analysis is the agroecosystem (AES), defined on the basis of prevailing climate and cropping systems, which currently serve as the foundation for climate adaptation planning in the region. We find that interannual temperature variability is greatest in the hottest, driest AES, and is most pronounced in the dry season. All AES warmed significantly in all seasons over the analysis period, but the magnitude of trend was greatest in high elevation AES. Precipitation variability was also large across AES, with largest interannual variability found in the dry season. This season is frequently excluded in climate analyses, but it is a critical harvest time and irrigation period. Trends in rainfall anomaly and precipitation concentration index are less clear, but there is a tendency towards drying and increasing irregularity of rainfall. Interestingly, we find little association between the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and temperature or precipitation variability at our study sites. This suggests that even though ENSO is a widely recognized driver of large-scale rainfall variability in the region, its impacts are highly spatially variable. This has implications for applying ENSO-based precipitation outlooks to agricultural management decisions. Farmer interviews reveal that local perceptions of climate variability and trends are generally consistent with the objective observations.
C1 [Ademe, Dereje] Debre Markos Univ, Coll Agr & Nat Resources, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
   [Ziatchik, Benjamin F.] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA.
   [Tesfaye, Kindie] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr CMMYT, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
   [Simane, Belay] Addis Ababa Univ, Coll Dev Studies, Ctr Environm & Dev Studies, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
   [Alemayehu, Getachew; Adgo, Enyew] Bahir Dar Univ, Coll Agr & Environm Sci, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
C3 Johns Hopkins University; Addis Ababa University; Bahir Dar University
RP Ademe, D (corresponding author), Debre Markos Univ, Coll Agr & Nat Resources, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
EM ademe.dereje@gmail.com
RI Simane, Belay/KII-9723-2024; Birhan, Dereje/GRO-6552-2022
OI Tesfaye, Kindie/0000-0002-7201-8053
FU Belmont Forum Collaborative Research (NILE-NEXUS) - National Science
   foundation (NSF) [1624335]; Directorate For Geosciences; ICER [1624335]
   Funding Source: National Science Foundation
FX The first author was supported by the Belmont Forum Collaborative
   Research (NILE-NEXUS-a projected award number 1624335) funded by the
   National Science foundation (NSF). The authors wish to acknowledge the
   Ethiopian National Meteorological Services Agency (NMA) for providing
   data used in this study. The CCl/WCRP/JCOMM Expert Team on Climate
   Change Detection and Indices (ETCCDI) is also acknowledged for the
   provision of access to the RHtestsV3 and RHtests_dlyPrcp software
   packages used for homogeneity test and change point detection and for
   their technical comments. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences,
   Johns Hopkins University is also acknowledged for hosting the first
   author as a visiting student.
CR ABER JD, 1992, OECOLOGIA, V92, P463, DOI 10.1007/BF00317837
   Addisu S., 2015, Environ Syst Res, V4, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1186/S40068-015-0051-0, 10.1186/s40068-015-0051-0]
   Alemayehu A, 2017, ENVIRON DEV, V24, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2017.06.006
   Alemayehu A, 2017, GEOGR ANN A, V99, P85, DOI 10.1080/04353676.2017.1289460
   Alemayehu A, 2016, ENVIRON DEV, V19, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2016.06.002
   Alemneh T, 2019, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V7, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00001
   Asfaw A, 2018, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V19, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2017.12.002
   Ayanlade A, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V630, P728, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.196
   Bassirirad H, 2000, NEW PHYTOL, V147, P155, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00682.x
   Brown ME, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V142, P169, DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-1948-6
   Cheung WH, 2008, INT J CLIMATOL, V28, P1723, DOI 10.1002/joc.1623
   Conway D., 2000, Sinet, Ethiopian Journal of Science, V23, P139
   Conway D, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.013
   de Beurs KM, 2009, ENVIRON RES LETT, V4, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045012
   de Luis M, 2011, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V11, P1259, DOI 10.5194/nhess-11-1259-2011
   Degefu MA, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P799, DOI 10.1007/s10113-013-0538-z
   Dinku T., 2016, 124 WORLD POL
   Dinku T, 2014, INT J CLIMATOL, V34, P2489, DOI 10.1002/joc.3855
   Gebrehiwot T., 2013, Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, V5, P104
   Gedefaw M, 2018, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/atmos9090326
   Gilbert RichardO., 1987, Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring, P204
   Gleixner S, 2017, CLIM DYNAM, V49, P1865, DOI 10.1007/s00382-016-3421-z
   Gocic M, 2013, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V100, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.10.014
   Hadgu G, 2015, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V121, P733, DOI 10.1007/s00704-014-1261-5
   Hamed KH, 2009, J HYDROL, V368, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.040
   Hare W., 2003, Assessment of Knowledge on Impacts of Climate Change - Contribution to the Specification of Art. 2 of the UNFCCC
   Hargreaves GH, 2003, J IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V129, P53, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2003)129:1(53)
   Hatfield JL, 2015, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V10, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001
   Iizumi T, 2015, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V4, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2014.11.003
   Jain SK, 2012, CURR SCI INDIA, V102, P37
   Kafadar K., Am Stat, DOI DOI 10.2307/2685660
   Mann HB, 1945, ECONOMETRICA, V13, P245, DOI 10.2307/1907187
   Mekasha A, 2014, INT J CLIMATOL, V34, P1990, DOI 10.1002/joc.3816
   Mengistu D, 2014, INT J CLIMATOL, V34, P2278, DOI 10.1002/joc.3837
   Nardone A, 2010, LIVEST SCI, V130, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.011
   Ochieng J, 2016, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V77, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2016.03.005
   OLIVER JE, 1980, PROF GEOGR, V32, P300, DOI 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1980.00300.x
   Onyutha C, 2016, J HYDRO-ENVIRON RES, V13, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.jher.2015.09.002
   Poisky L, 2017, J DAIRY SCI, V100, P8645, DOI 10.3168/jds.2017-12651
   Saier MH, 2007, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V181, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11270-007-9372-6
   Salehnia N, 2017, J ARID LAND, V9, P797, DOI 10.1007/s40333-017-0070-y
   Samy A, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11030468
   Schlenker W, 2010, ENVIRON RES LETT, V5, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014010
   Shah NH, 2003, PLANT SOIL, V257, P219, DOI 10.1023/A:1026237816578
   Simane B, 2016, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V21, P39, DOI 10.1007/s11027-014-9568-1
   Simane B, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V5, P592, DOI 10.3390/su5020592
   Simane B, 2012, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V9, P610, DOI 10.3390/ijerph9020610
   Suryabhagavan KV, 2017, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V15, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2016.11.005
   Tabari H, 2015, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V29, P1751, DOI 10.1007/s00477-015-1046-0
   Tigchelaar M, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P6644, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1718031115
   Tilahun K, 2006, J ARID ENVIRON, V64, P474, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.06.013
   van Giersbergen NPA, 2005, ECON LETT, V89, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.econlet.2005.05.013
   Viste E, 2013, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V112, P535, DOI 10.1007/s00704-012-0746-3
   Wagesho N, 2013, HYDROLOG SCI J, V58, P354, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2012.754543
   Wang XLL, 2008, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V47, P2423, DOI 10.1175/2008JAMC1741.1
   Wang XLL, 2008, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V25, P368, DOI 10.1175/2007JTECHA982.1
   Wang XLL, 2010, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V49, P2416, DOI 10.1175/2010JAMC2376.1
   Wang Xuanding, 2013, Research on axial and eccentric behavior of tubed steel reinforced concrete stub columns, P1
   Weldlul A., 2016, THESIS, P220
   Zaitchik BF, 2012, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V9, P435, DOI 10.3390/ijerph9020435
   Zhao C, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P9326, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1701762114
NR 61
TC 48
Z9 48
U1 0
U2 6
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0947
J9 WEATHER CLIM EXTREME
JI Weather Clim. Extremes
PD SEP
PY 2020
VL 29
AR 100263
DI 10.1016/j.wace.2020.100263
PG 15
WC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA NK7EU
UT WOS:000566896900007
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT S
AU van den Homberg, M
   McQuistan, C
AF van den Homberg, Marc
   McQuistan, Colin
BE Mechler, R
   Bouwer, LM
   Schinko, T
   Surminski, S
   LinneroothBayer, J
TI Technology for Climate Justice: A Reporting Framework for Loss and
   Damage as Part of Key Global Agreements
SO LOSS AND DAMAGE FROM CLIMATE CHANGE: CONCEPTS, METHODS AND POLICY
   OPTIONS
SE Climate Risk Management Policy and Governance
LA English
DT Article; Book Chapter
DE Loss and damage; Flood early warning systems; Adaptation; Climate risk
   management; Climate justice; Sendai framework for DRR; Sustainable
   development goals; Paris agreement
ID ADAPTATION; DISASTER; KATRINA
AB Technology plays a critical role in the ability to retain, reduce or transfer climate risk or address impacts. However, vulnerable communities do not fully benefit from existing technology, whereas they are disproportionally impacted by climate change. This chapter assesses how technology can shape limits to adaptation and how to report on this injustice as part of key global agreements. We develop an access, use and innovation of technology framework. As a case on a relevant technology, we test it on transboundary early warning systems in South Asia. We find that only a limited set of the state-of-the-art technologies available globally is accessed and used. Insufficient capacity and funding result in the bare minimum, largely copycat type of technology. As climate change progresses, demands on technology increase, whereas, if no action is taken, the technology remains the same widening the adaptation deficit. A better understanding of the crossover from disaster risk reduction to climate adaptation and the emerging policy domain of loss and damage allows trade-offs in terms of reducing risks through greater investment in technologies for adaptation versus absorbing risks and then financing curative or transformative loss and damage measures. We argue that attention to especially distributive, compensatory and procedural climate justice principles, in terms of distributing technology, building capacity and providing finance, can help to motivate support for widening the technology spectrum available to developing countries. We propose as part of comprehensive risk management that, first, an inventory should be developed how of technologies shape soft and hard adaptation limits. Second, technology for climate justice might be included in the adaptation communications to support reporting on the expected and experienced impact of measures on loss and damage, at a sufficiently disaggregated level. Third, soft adaptation limits should be levelled by making technology research, innovation and design equitable between those countries having capacity and those not, recognising the commitment to leave no one behind.
C1 [van den Homberg, Marc; McQuistan, Colin] Pract Act, Rugby, England.
RP van den Homberg, M (corresponding author), Pract Act, Rugby, England.
EM marcjchr@gmail.com; colin.mcquistan@practicalaction.org.uk
RI van den Homberg, Marc/AGY-9332-2022
OI van den Homberg, Marc/0000-0003-1436-254X
FU Zurich Flood Resilience Alliance
FX The Zurich Flood Resilience Alliance supported this work. The authors
   gratefully acknowledge input by the following experts from Practical
   Action: Jonathan Casey, Christine Comerford (UK), Gopal Ghimire,
   Dinanath Bhandari, Gehendra Gurung and Sumit Dugar (Nepal), Rigan Ali
   Khan (Bangladesh) and K. R. Viswanathan (India).
CR [Anonymous], 2012, LIT REV TOP CONT THE
   [Anonymous], 2011, The Guardian
   Boldt J., 2012, OVERCOMING BARRIERS
   Boyd E, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P723, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE3389
   Bridgeman T, 2017, PARIS IS BINDING AGR
   Burton I., 2004, Climate Change, P25
   Chaudhury A., 2014, 67 CCAFS
   Christiansen L., 2011, TECHNOLOGIES ADAPTAT
   Climate Centre, 2017, HYDR HUM SECT JOINT
   Culubrk S, 2015, J NANOMATER, V2015, DOI 10.1155/2015/514173
   Cumiskey L., 2014, Bangladesh: Final Report
   de Perez EC, 2016, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V20, P3549, DOI 10.5194/hess-20-3549-2016
   Desgain DDR, 2016, UNDERSTANDING PARIS
   Dow K, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P384, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.005
   ECBI (European Capacity Building Initiative), 2017, POCK GUID TRANSP
   ETC Group, 2010, GEN GIANTS STOCKP PA
   Etkin D., 1999, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V1, P69
   Freudenburg WR, 2008, SOC FORCES, V87, P1015
   [Government of Nepal Ministry of Population and Environment], 2016, NAT DET CONTR
   Hallegatte S., 2016, Unbreakable: Building the resilience of the poor in the face of natural disasters
   Handmer J, 2019, CLIM RISK MANAGE POL, P365, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5_15
   Haque M, 2019, CLIM RISK MANAGE POL, P451, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5_19
   Headache classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS), 2018, Cephalalgia, V38, P1, DOI [10.1177/0333102417738202, DOI 10.1177/0333102417738202, DOI 10.2833/9937]
   Heslin A, 2019, CLIM RISK MANAGE POL, P383, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5_16
   Heslin A, 2019, CLIM RISK MANAGE POL, P237, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5_10
   Huntington HP, 2012, AMBIO, V41, P66, DOI 10.1007/s13280-011-0226-5
   IISD, 2011, CLIM RISK MAN TECHN
   IPCC, 2018, GLOB WARM 1 5C SUMM
   James RA, 2019, CLIM RISK MANAGE POL, P113, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5_5
   Kates RW, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P7156, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1115521109
   Kato T., 2016, COMMUNICATING PROGR
   Khan M., 2016, Capacity building under the Paris Agreement
   Klein RJT, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P899
   Klinsky S, 2018, ROUTLEDGE ADV CLIMAT
   Klinsky S., 2014, Building Climate Equity: Creating a New Approach from the Ground Up
   Landauer M, 2019, CLIM RISK MANAGE POL, P425, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5_18
   Link LE, 2010, OCEAN ENG, V37, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.09.002
   Martin M, 2017, FINANCING SUSTAINABL
   Maskrey A, 2016, MONITORING PROGR DIS
   Mechler R., 2019, CLIM RISK MANAGE POL, P3, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5_1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5_1]
   Mechler R, 2016, SCIENCE, V354, P290, DOI 10.1126/science.aag2514
   Moser SC, 2010, APPL GEOGR, V30, P464, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.09.003
   Mysiak J, 2016, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V16, P2189, DOI 10.5194/nhess-16-2189-2016
   National Planning Commission, 2015, SUST DEV GOALS 2016
   O'Brien K, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, P437
   Pauw WP, 2016, NDC EXPLORER, DOI [10.23661/NDC_EXPLORER_2017_2.0, DOI 10.23661/NDC_EXPL0RER_2017_2.0]
   Raworth K., 2012, SAFE JUST SPACE HUMA
   Regmi BR, 2016, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V21, P461, DOI 10.1007/s11027-014-9610-3
   Schinko T, 2019, CLIM RISK MANAGE POL, P83, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5_4
   Schinko Thomas, 2017, Ecol Econ, V136, P296, DOI [10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.008, DOI 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2017.02.008]
   Shimada K, 2017, POTENTIAL ROLE TECHN
   Simpson AL, 2015, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V3, DOI 10.3389/feart.2015.00050
   Surminski S., 2012, Current knowledge on relevant methodologies and data requirements as well as lessons learned and gaps identified at different levels
   Tomlinson L., 2015, Procedural Justice in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: Negotiating Fairness, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-17184-5
   Trace S., 2016, Rethink, Retool, Reboot: Technology as if people and planet mattered
   Transparency Partnership, 2017, PREP NEW TRANSP FRAM
   Turner RE, 2006, SCIENCE, V314, P449, DOI 10.1126/science.1129116
   UNESCAP, 2015, OV NAT DIS THEIR IMP
   UNFCCC, 2014, HDB MEAS REP VER DEV
   UNFCCC, 2006, FCCCTP20062
   UNISDR, 2017, GLOB SUMM REP SEND F
   UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduc- tion), 2016, SCI TECHN ROADM SUPP
   UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction), 2015, Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030
   van der Geest K, 2015, INT J GLOBAL WARM, V8, P133
   Verheyen R., 2012, Tackling Loss & Damage-A new role for the climate regime, P1
   Walker G, 2009, ANTIPODE, V41, P614, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00691.x
   Wallimann-Helmer I, 2019, CLIM RISK MANAGE POL, P39, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5_2
   Winkler H, 2014, CLIM POLICY, V14, P102, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2013.791184
   Winsemius HC, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P381, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2893, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2893]
   World Bank, 2010, BANGL EC AD CLIM CHA
NR 70
TC 17
Z9 18
U1 1
U2 12
PU SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
PI CHAM
PA GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND
SN 2510-1390
EI 2510-1404
BN 978-3-319-72026-5; 978-3-319-72025-8
J9 CLIM RISK MANAGE POL
PY 2019
BP 513
EP 545
DI 10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5_22
D2 10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5
PG 33
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies; Geography
WE Book Citation Index – Social Sciences & Humanities (BKCI-SSH); Book Citation Index – Science (BKCI-S)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology;
   Geography
GA BQ0HE
UT WOS:000571983800025
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Liu, Y
   El-Kassaby, YA
AF Liu, Yang
   El-Kassaby, Yousry A.
TI Global Analysis of Small RNA Dynamics during Seed Development of
   <i>Picea glauca</i> and <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> Populations Reveals
   Insights on their Evolutionary Trajectories
SO FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptive strategy; Arabidopsis thaliana; microRNA; organismal
   complexity; phenotypic variation; Picea glauca; seed ontogeny; small RNA
   evolution
ID NORWAY SPRUCE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; CLIMATIC ADAPTATION; EMBRYO
   DEVELOPMENT; MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA; PLANT MICRORNAS; GENE-EXPRESSION;
   ZYGOTIC EMBRYO; DORMANCY; TARGET
AB While DNA methylation carries genetic signals and is instrumental in the evolution of organismal complexity, small RNAs (sRNAs), similar to 18-24 ribonucleotide (nt) sequences, are crucial mediators of methylation as well as gene silencing. However, scant study deals with sRNA evolution via featuring their expression dynamics coupled with species of different evolutionary time. Here we report an atlas of sRNAs and microRNAs (miRNAs, single-stranded sRNAs) produced over time at seed-set of two major spermatophytes represented by populations of Picea glauca and Arabidopsis thaliana with different seed-set duration. We applied diverse profiling methods to examine sRNA and miRNA features, including size distribution, sequence conservation and reproduction-specific regulation, as well as to predict their putative targets. The top 27 most abundant miRNAs were highly overlapped between the two species (e.g., miR166,-319 and-396), but in P. glauca, they were less abundant and significantly less correlated with seed-set phases. The most abundant sRNAs in libraries were deeply conserved miRNAs in the plant kingdom for Arabidopsis but long sRNAs (24-nt) for P. glauca. We also found significant difference in normalized expression between populations for population-specific sRNAs but not for lineage-specific ones. Moreover, lineage-specific sRNAs were enriched in the 21-nt size class. This pattern is consistent in both species and alludes to a specific type of sRNAs (e.g., miRNA, tasiRNA) being selected for. In addition, we deemed 24 and 9 sRNAs in P. glauca and Arabidopsis, respectively, as sRNA candidates targeting known adaptive genes. Temperature had significant influence on selected gene and miRNA expression at seed development in both species. This study increases our integrated understanding of sRNA evolution and its potential link to genomic architecture (e.g., sRNA derivation from genome and sRNA-mediated genomic events) and organismal complexity (e.g., association between different sRNA expression and their functionality).
C1 [Liu, Yang; El-Kassaby, Yousry A.] Univ British Columbia, Dept Forest & Conservat Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
C3 University of British Columbia
RP Liu, Y; El-Kassaby, YA (corresponding author), Univ British Columbia, Dept Forest & Conservat Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
EM yliu2011@interchange.ubc.ca; y.el-kassaby@ubc.ca
RI Liu, Yang/HLW-2939-2023
OI Liu, Yang/0000-0002-3479-9223
FU Johnson's Family Forest Biotechnology Endowment; National Science and
   Engineering Research Council of Canada
FX This project was funded by the Johnson's Family Forest Biotechnology
   Endowment and the National Science and Engineering Research Council of
   Canada Discovery and Industrial Research Chair to YE.
CR Abdel-Ghany SE, 2008, J BIOL CHEM, V283, P15932, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M801406200
   Ali-Rachedi S, 2004, PLANTA, V219, P479, DOI 10.1007/s00425-004-1251-4
   Almeida R, 2005, TRENDS CELL BIOL, V15, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.03.006
   An JY, 2014, BMC BIOINFORMATICS, V15, DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-15-275
   Anderson LL, 2006, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V103, P12447, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0605310103
   Ashburner M, 2000, NAT GENET, V25, P25, DOI 10.1038/75556
   Aung K, 2006, PLANT PHYSIOL, V141, P1000, DOI 10.1104/pp.106.078063
   Axtell MJ, 2008, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V13, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.03.009
   Axtell MJ, 2007, PLANT CELL, V19, P1750, DOI 10.1105/tpc.107.051706
   Bari R, 2006, PLANT PHYSIOL, V141, P988, DOI 10.1104/pp.106.079707
   Birchler JA, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P14746, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1207726109
   Bräutigam K, 2013, ECOL EVOL, V3, P399, DOI 10.1002/ece3.461
   Brousse C, 2014, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V42, P5270, DOI 10.1093/nar/gku157
   Cairney J, 2007, NEW PHYTOL, V176, P511, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02239.x
   Cairney J, 2006, PLANT MOL BIOL, V62, P485, DOI 10.1007/s11103-006-9035-9
   Montes RAC, 2014, NAT COMMUN, V5, DOI 10.1038/ncomms4722
   Chen K, 2007, NAT REV GENET, V8, P93, DOI 10.1038/nrg1990
   Chiang GCK, 2013, EVOLUTION, V67, P883, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01828.x
   Chou CH, 2016, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V44, pD239, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkv1258
   Cortijo S, 2014, SCIENCE, V343, P1145, DOI 10.1126/science.1248127
   Cubas P, 1999, NATURE, V401, P157, DOI 10.1038/43657
   Cui J, 2017, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V35, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2016.11.006
   Cuperus JT, 2011, PLANT CELL, V23, P431, DOI 10.1105/tpc.110.082784
   Czechowski T, 2005, PLANT PHYSIOL, V139, P5, DOI 10.1104/pp.105.063743
   Dai Xinbin, 2011, Nucleic Acids Res, V39, pW155, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkr319
   De Felippes FF, 2008, RNA, V14, P2455, DOI 10.1261/rna.1149408
   De La Torre AR, 2017, MOL BIOL EVOL, V34, P1363, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msx069
   de Vega-Bartol JJ, 2013, BMC PLANT BIOL, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-13-123
   Diez CM, 2014, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V18, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2013.11.017
   Dong CH, 2014, J PLANT BIOL, V57, P209, DOI 10.1007/s12374-013-0490-y
   Dowen RH, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, pE2183, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1209329109
   Dugas DV, 2004, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V7, P512, DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.07.011
   Fahlgren N, 2007, PLOS ONE, V2, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0000219
   Fahlgren N, 2010, PLANT CELL, V22, P1074, DOI 10.1105/tpc.110.073999
   Fattash I, 2007, BMC PLANT BIOL, V7, DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-7-13
   Fedak H, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, pE7846, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1608827113
   Finet C, 2013, MOL BIOL EVOL, V30, P45, DOI 10.1093/molbev/mss220
   Fischerova L, 2008, PLANT CELL REP, V27, P435, DOI 10.1007/s00299-007-0469-6
   Flynt AS, 2008, NAT REV GENET, V9, P831, DOI 10.1038/nrg2455
   Hodgins KA, 2016, MOL BIOL EVOL, V33, P1502, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msw032
   Hornoy B, 2015, GENOME BIOL EVOL, V7, P3269, DOI 10.1093/gbe/evv218
   Hornstein E, 2006, NAT GENET, V38, pS20, DOI 10.1038/ng1803
   Huang XQ, 2010, MOL ECOL, V19, P1335, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04557.x
   Huo HQ, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, pE2199, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1600558113
   Jagadeeswaran G, 2014, PLANT J, V77, P85, DOI 10.1111/tpj.12364
   Jaramillo-Correa JP, 2004, MOL ECOL, V13, P2735, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02258.x
   Johannes F, 2009, PLOS GENET, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000530
   Johnsen O, 2005, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V28, P1090, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01356.x
   Jones-Rhoades MW, 2004, MOL CELL, V14, P787, DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.027
   Källman T, 2013, PLANT PHYSIOL, V162, P741, DOI 10.1104/pp.113.214643
   Kawashima CG, 2009, PLANT J, V57, P313, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03690.x
   Kinoshita N, 2012, PLANT CELL, V24, P3590, DOI 10.1105/tpc.112.097006
   Koornneef M, 2000, GENETICS SEED DORMAN
   Krämer U, 2015, ELIFE, V4, DOI 10.7554/eLife.06100
   Kvaalen H, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V177, P49, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02222.x
   Leitch AR, 2012, NEW PHYTOL, V194, P629, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04105.x
   Lelandais-Brière C, 2009, PLANT CELL, V21, P2780, DOI 10.1105/tpc.109.068130
   Lewsey MG, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, pE801, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1515072113
   Li AL, 2007, CELL RES, V17, P212, DOI 10.1038/sj.cr.7310113
   Li WX, 2008, PLANT CELL, V20, P2238, DOI 10.1105/tpc.108.059444
   Lindow M, 2005, BMC GENOMICS, V6, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-6-119
   Lira-Medeiros CF, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010326
   Liu XD, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P15485, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1304651110
   Liu Y, 2017, PLANT CELL REP, V36, P705, DOI 10.1007/s00299-017-2111-6
   Liu Y, 2017, GENOME BIOL EVOL, V9, P82, DOI 10.1093/gbe/evw283
   Liu Y, 2016, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V13, P2945, DOI 10.5194/bg-13-2945-2016
   Liu Y, 2015, BMC PLANT BIOL, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12870-015-0638-7
   Maher C, 2006, GENOME RES, V16, P510, DOI 10.1101/gr.4680506
   MAPES G, 1989, NATURE, V337, P645, DOI 10.1038/337645a0
   Mastrangelo AM, 2012, PLANT SCI, V185, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.09.006
   May P, 2013, NAT COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1038/ncomms3145
   Michod RE, 2001, HEREDITY, V86, P1, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00808.x
   Navarro L, 2006, SCIENCE, V312, P436, DOI 10.1126/science.1126088
   Navarro L, 2008, SCIENCE, V321, P964, DOI 10.1126/science.1159505
   Nawrocki EP, 2015, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V43, pD130, DOI 10.1093/nar/gku1063
   Nosaka M, 2012, PLOS GENET, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002953
   Nozawa M, 2012, GENOME BIOL EVOL, V4, P230, DOI 10.1093/gbe/evs002
   Nystedt B, 2013, NATURE, V497, P579, DOI 10.1038/nature12211
   Ogata H, 1999, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V27, P29, DOI 10.1093/nar/27.1.29
   Oh TJ, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V179, P67, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02448.x
   Oksanen J, 2022, R package version 2.6-2, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412971874.N145
   Piriyapongsa J, 2008, RNA, V14, P814, DOI 10.1261/rna.916708
   Prunier J, 2016, NEW PHYTOL, V209, P44, DOI 10.1111/nph.13565
   Reyes JL, 2007, PLANT J, V49, P592, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02980.x
   Rhoades MW, 2002, CELL, V110, P513, DOI 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00863-2
   Richards CL, 2012, ECOL LETT, V15, P1016, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01824.x
   Rubio-Somoza I, 2011, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V16, P258, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.03.001
   Rueda A, 2015, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V43, pW467, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkv555
   Schneider H, 2004, NATURE, V428, P553, DOI 10.1038/nature02361
   Schulz B, 2014, MOL ECOL, V23, P3523, DOI 10.1111/mec.12835
   Sigman MJ, 2016, PLANT CELL, V28, P304, DOI 10.1105/tpc.15.00869
   Sparks E, 2013, NAT REV GENET, V14, P631, DOI 10.1038/nrg3541
   Springthorpe V, 2015, ELIFE, V4, DOI 10.7554/eLife.05557
   Sun J, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0034092
   Sunkar R, 2012, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V17, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.01.010
   Takuno S, 2016, NAT PLANTS, V2, DOI [10.1038/NPLANTS.2015.222, 10.1038/nplants.2015.222]
   Taylor RS, 2014, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V19, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.11.008
   Tiwari SB, 2003, PLANT CELL, V15, P533, DOI 10.1105/tpc.008417
   Tollefsrud MM, 2008, MOL ECOL, V17, P4134, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03893.x
   Ulmasov T, 1999, PLANT J, V19, P309, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00538.x
   Vanneste K, 2014, PHILOS T R SOC B, V369, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2013.0353
   Vidal EA, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P4477, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0909571107
   Vidigal DS, 2016, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V39, P1737, DOI 10.1111/pce.12734
   Wagner GP, 1996, EVOLUTION, V50, P967, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb02339.x
   Wang HLV, 2015, RNA, V21, P145, DOI 10.1261/rna.047662.114
   Wang XQ, 2014, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V75, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.02.005
   Warren RL, 2015, PLANT J, V83, P189, DOI 10.1111/tpj.12886
   Wendel JF, 2016, GENOME BIOL, V17, DOI 10.1186/s13059-016-0908-1
   Willmann MR, 2007, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V10, P503, DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.07.004
   Wu CI, 2009, GENOME RES, V19, P734, DOI 10.1101/gr.084640.108
   Xia R, 2015, MOL BIOL EVOL, V32, P2905, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msv164
   Xiang DQ, 2011, PLANT PHYSIOL, V156, P346, DOI 10.1104/pp.110.171702
   Yakovlev IA, 2010, NEW PHYTOL, V187, P1154, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03341.x
   Yeaman S, 2016, SCIENCE, V353, P1431, DOI 10.1126/science.aaf7812
   Zhang BH, 2006, PLANT J, V46, P243, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02697.X
   Zhang XM, 2011, MOL CELL, V42, P356, DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.04.010
   Zhang Y, 2012, PLANT CELL REP, V31, P1637, DOI 10.1007/s00299-012-1277-1
   Zhang Y, 2014, BMC PLANT BIOL, V14, DOI 10.1186/s12870-014-0271-x
NR 118
TC 8
Z9 9
U1 1
U2 16
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
SN 1664-462X
J9 FRONT PLANT SCI
JI Front. Plant Sci.
PD OCT 4
PY 2017
VL 8
AR 1719
DI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01719
PG 22
WC Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences
GA FI8AM
UT WOS:000412222100001
PM 29046688
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Atta, MHR
   Zoromba, MA
   Asal, MGR
   AbdELhay, ES
   Hendy, A
   Sayed, MA
   Abd Elmonem, HH
   El-ayari, OSM
   Sehsah, I
   AbdELhay, IS
   Rahman, AAAOA
   Balha, SMI
   Taha, HMA
   Shehata, HS
   Othman, AA
   Mohamed, AZ
   Abdelrahman, MM
   Ibrahim, NMI
   Hassan, EHM
   Abd El-fatah, HAM
   Ali, AAM
   Elsmalosy, MFA
   Machaly, ER
   Ghoneam, MA
   Ali, AFZ
   Elfar, MNA
   El-Sayed, AAI
   Mahmoud, MFH
   Hassan, EA
AF Atta, Mohamed Hussein Ramadan
   Zoromba, Mohamed A.
   Asal, Maha Gamal Ramadan
   AbdELhay, Eman Sameh
   Hendy, Abdelaziz
   Sayed, Mervat Amin
   Abd Elmonem, Huwida Hamdy
   El-ayari, Omnya Sobhy Mohamad
   Sehsah, Ibrahim
   AbdELhay, Islam Sameh
   Rahman, Alzahraa Abdel Aziz Omar Abdel
   Balha, Selwan Mahmoud Ibrahim
   Taha, Heba Mostafa Ali
   Shehata, Hanady. Sh.
   Othman, Ahmed Abdellah
   Mohamed, Ahmed Zaher
   Abdelrahman, Mahitab Mohamed
   Ibrahim, Noha Mohammed Ibrahim
   Hassan, Eman Hassan Mahmoud
   Abd El-fatah, Hend Ali Mohamed
   Ali, Amal AbdElaal Mohamed
   Elsmalosy, Mohamed Farag Awad
   Machaly, Eslam Reda
   Ghoneam, Mohamed Adel
   Ali, Amal Fawzy Zaki
   Elfar, Mira Naguib Abdelrazek
   El-Sayed, Ahmed Abdelwahab Ibrahim
   Mahmoud, Marwa Fouad Hanafy
   Hassan, Eman Arafa
TI Predictors of climate change literacy in the era of global boiling: a
   cross-sectional survey of Egyptian nursing students
SO BMC NURSING
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; Egyptian; Global boiling; Literacy; Multi-site survey;
   Nursing students; Predictors
AB Background Climate changes have led to health and environmental risks, so it has become essential to measure climate change literacy among the entire population, especially nursing students. The significant role of nursing students in raising public awareness and future healthcare roles emphasizes assessing the predictors of climate change literacy among nursing students. Aims This study seeks to identify the predictors of climate change literacy among nursing students in A Multi-Site Survey. Design A multi-site descriptive cross-sectional study adheres to the guidelines outlined in A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting Survey Studies collected for five months, from the 1st of July 2023 to November 2023. The study participants comprise 10,084 nursing students from all 27 governments in Egypt. The researcher used the Predictors of Nursing Students' Climate Change Literacy scale in this study. Data was collected, with 25 min average time to complete. Backward multiple linear regression was used to identify these predictors. Results In the current study, nursing students demonstrated a moderate understanding of climate science (mean score 14.38), communication and advocacy skills (mean score 14.41), and knowledge of adaptation and mitigation strategies (mean score 13.33). Climate health impacts (mean score 17.72) emerged as the domain with the highest level of knowledge. No significant differences in climate literacy were observed across diverse student backgrounds (all p-values were > 0.05). Perceived faculty knowledge of climate change positively correlated with all four domains of climate literacy and emerged as a significant predictor in multiple linear regression analyses (all p-values were < 0.001). Implication. While our findings highlight significant predictors of climate literacy, it is essential to recognize that these results identify associations rather than causal relationships. Based on these associations, it is recommended that nursing professionals be equipped with comprehensive knowledge of climate adaptation strategies to better advocate for and implement effective public health measures.
C1 [Atta, Mohamed Hussein Ramadan] Alexandria Univ, Fac Nursing, Psychiat Nursing Dept, Psychiat & Mental Hlth Nursing Dept, Admeon Freemon St, Alexandria, Egypt.
   [Zoromba, Mohamed A.; AbdELhay, Eman Sameh] Mansoura Univ, Fac Nursing, Psychiat & Mental Hlth Nursing, Mansoura, Egypt.
   [Asal, Maha Gamal Ramadan] Alexandria Univ, Fac Nursing, Med Surg Nursing Dept, Alexandria, Egypt.
   [Hendy, Abdelaziz] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Nursing, Pediat Nursing, Cairo, Egypt.
   [Sayed, Mervat Amin] Fayoum Univ, Fac Nursing, Community Hlth Nursing, Faiyum, Egypt.
   [Abd Elmonem, Huwida Hamdy] Pediat Nursing, Fayoum City, Egypt.
   [El-ayari, Omnya Sobhy Mohamad] Kafr ElSheikh Univ, Fac Nursing Psychiat Nursing & Mental Hlth, Kafr Elsheikh City, Egypt.
   [Sehsah, Ibrahim] MTI Univ, Fac Engn, Cairo, Egypt.
   [AbdELhay, Islam Sameh] Mansoura Univ, Fac Nursing, Nursing Adm, Mansoura, Egypt.
   [Rahman, Alzahraa Abdel Aziz Omar Abdel] Minya Univ, Fac Nursing, Psychiat Mental Hlth Nursing, Minya City, Egypt.
   [Balha, Selwan Mahmoud Ibrahim] Tanta Univ, Fac Nursing, Psychiat & Mental Hlth Nursing, Tanta, Egypt.
   [Taha, Heba Mostafa Ali] Nursing Adm Dept Univ, Assiut City, Egypt.
   [Shehata, Hanady. Sh.] Menoufia Univ, Fac Nursing, Family & Community Hlth Nursing, Menofia City, Egypt.
   [Othman, Ahmed Abdellah] Sohag Univ, Nursing Adm, Sohag City, Egypt.
   [Mohamed, Ahmed Zaher] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Nursing, Psychiat Mental Hlth Nursing, Cairo, Egypt.
   [Abdelrahman, Mahitab Mohamed] Suez Canal Univ, Fac Nursing, Ismailia, Egypt.
   [Ibrahim, Noha Mohammed Ibrahim] Port Said Univ, Fac Nursing, Med Surg Nursing, Port Said, Egypt.
   [Hassan, Eman Hassan Mahmoud] Helwan Univ, Pediat Nursing, Helwan City, Egypt.
   [Abd El-fatah, Hend Ali Mohamed] Suez Canal Univ, Fac Nursing, Matern Obstet & Gynecol, Ismailia city, Egypt.
   [Ali, Amal AbdElaal Mohamed] South Valley Univ, Qena, Egypt.
   [Elsmalosy, Mohamed Farag Awad] Matrouh Univ, Psychiat Mental Hlth Nursing, Marsa Matroh City, Egypt.
   [Machaly, Eslam Reda] Suez Canal Univ, Pediat Nursing, Suez City, Egypt.
   [Ghoneam, Mohamed Adel] Beni Suef Univ, Crit Care & Emergency Nursing, Beni Suef City, Egypt.
   [Ali, Amal Fawzy Zaki] Zagazig Univ, Tech Inst Nursing, Zagazig, Egypt.
   [Elfar, Mira Naguib Abdelrazek] Alexandria Univ, Fac Nursing, Psychiat & Mental Hlth Nursing Dept, Alexandria City, Egypt.
   [El-Sayed, Ahmed Abdelwahab Ibrahim] Alexandria Univ, Fac Nursing, Nursing Adm Dept, Alexandria City, Egypt.
   [Mahmoud, Marwa Fouad Hanafy] Damanhour Univ, Fac Nursing, Nursing Educ Dept, Damanhour City, Egypt.
   [Hassan, Eman Arafa] Alexandria Univ, Crit Care & Emergency Nursing, Alexandria, Egypt.
C3 Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Alexandria University; Egyptian Knowledge
   Bank (EKB); Mansoura University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB);
   Alexandria University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Ain Shams
   University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Fayoum University; Egyptian
   Knowledge Bank (EKB); Kafrelsheikh University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank
   (EKB); Mansoura University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Minia
   University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Tanta University; Egyptian
   Knowledge Bank (EKB); Menofia University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB);
   Sohag University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Ain Shams University;
   Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Suez Canal University; Egyptian Knowledge
   Bank (EKB); Port Said University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Helwan
   University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Suez Canal University;
   Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); South Valley University Egypt; Matrouh
   University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Suez Canal University;
   Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Beni Suef University; Egyptian Knowledge
   Bank (EKB); Zagazig University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB);
   Alexandria University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Alexandria
   University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Damanhour University;
   Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Alexandria University
RP Atta, MHR (corresponding author), Alexandria Univ, Fac Nursing, Psychiat Nursing Dept, Psychiat & Mental Hlth Nursing Dept, Admeon Freemon St, Alexandria, Egypt.
EM mohamed-hussein@alexu.edu.eg
RI Hassan, Eman/AFA-4332-2022; El-ayari, Omnya/ABR-8417-2022; Ramadan Atta,
   mohamed/JZE-1020-2024; Hendy, Abdelaziz/AAB-8623-2022; Asal,
   Maha/ABQ-3943-2022; Othman, Ahmed/KZU-6120-2024; Hassan, Eman
   HAMZA/HJP-5029-2023; Abd elhay, Eman/ABS-8724-2022; Machaly,
   Eslam/JGL-9321-2023; Ghoneam, Mohamed Adel/JXN-4786-2024; Abdelwahab,
   Ahmed/HLQ-2997-2023; Zoromba, Mohamed/B-1990-2019; Zaher, Dr.
   Ahmed/GQQ-5738-2022
OI Asal, Maha/0000-0002-9348-8898; Abdelrahman,
   Mahitab/0000-0001-8582-5762; Abdelwahab, Ahmed/0000-0001-9124-0808;
   Zoromba, Mohamed/0000-0002-4298-1121; Elfar, mira naguib
   abdelrazek/0009-0005-7235-9340; Zaher, Dr. Ahmed/0000-0001-6982-8541;
   Othman, Ahmed/0009-0009-6755-0625
FU Alexandria University
FX We express our heartfelt gratitude to everyone who participated in the
   study.
CR Abdallah MM, 2023, Role of social media in enhancing climate change literacy among Egyptianusers, P1
   Abdel Nabi E., 2023, Helwan Int J Nurs Res Pract, V2, P69, DOI [10.21608/hijnrp.2023.201614.1068, DOI 10.21608/HIJNRP.2023.201614.1068]
   Abousoliman AD, 2024, BMC NURS, V23, DOI 10.1186/s12912-024-01927-8
   Allen I. E., 2007, Qual. Prog, V40, P64, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1365-2929.2004.02012.X
   Alvarez-Nieto C, 2022, NURS EDUC TODAY, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105185
   Amerson RM, 2022, NURS EDUC PERSPECT, V43, P277, DOI 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000991
   Anåker A, 2021, NURS EDUC TODAY, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105028
   [Anonymous], 2021, Emergency response to rains and poor weather: school suspended in nine governorates and at Alexandria University
   Aronsson J, 2024, J ADV NURS, V80, P3072, DOI 10.1111/jan.15950
   Aronsson J, 2020, NURS HEALTH SCI, V22, P803, DOI 10.1111/nhs.12734
   Barreda AB., 2018, J SUSTAIN ED, V17, P1
   Belton D., 2024, Educ Plan, V31, P7
   Bist M., 2022, J. Student Res, V11, ppp, DOI [10.47611/jsrhs.v11i3.3661, DOI 10.47611/JSRHS.V11I3.3661]
   Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Climate change in Egypt: opportunities and obstacles
   CNN, 2023, Morgues overwhelmed in Libya as floods death toll tops 6,000
   Cook C, 2019, AM J NURS, V119, P54, DOI 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000554551.46769.49
   Cruz JP, 2018, INT NURS REV, V65, P408, DOI 10.1111/inr.12432
   Decamp E, 2024, ENVIRON EDUC RES, V30, P2159, DOI 10.1080/13504622.2024.2309588
   Deshiana A., 2022, Berk Ilm Pendidik Fis, V10, P320, DOI [10.20527/bipf.v10i3.14001, DOI 10.20527/BIPF.V10I3.14001]
   Dong J, The impact of climate change on cognitive performance of children in english school stock
   Dwivedi YK, 2022, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102456
   Eide Phyllis, 2019, Annu Rev Nurs Res, V38, P131, DOI 10.1891/0739-6686.38.131
   El-Sayed AAI, 2023, BMC NURS, V22, DOI 10.1186/s12912-023-01485-5
   Ergin E, 2021, NURS EDUC TODAY, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105144
   Erguvan ID, 2024, HUM SOC SCI COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1057/s41599-024-03149-4
   Eriksen S, 2021, WORLD DEV, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105383
   Glauberman Gary, 2023, Hawaii J Health Soc Welf, V82, P120
   Hansen BS, 2022, NURS FORUM, V57, P1593, DOI 10.1111/nuf.12827
   Hertzog MA, 2008, RES NURS HEALTH, V31, P180, DOI 10.1002/nur.20247
   Hussaini MHAL., 2023, Int J Integr Sci, V2, P513
   Hussein M, 2024, The role of empathy in the relationship between emotional support and caring behavior towards patients among intern nursing students, P1
   Ifegbesan AP., 2021, J Environ Sci Sustain Dev, V4, P222
   Incesu O, 2024, PUBLIC HEALTH NURS, V41, P67, DOI 10.1111/phn.13255
   Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, Libya - years of conflict and weakened infrastructure compound Derna flood impact
   International Council of Nurses, Nurses, climate change and health position statement
   IPCC, IPCC WGII sixth assessment report
   Kalogirou MR, 2020, J CLIN NURS, V29, P4759, DOI 10.1111/jocn.15519
   Kapan R., 2022, Heal Sci Q, V2, P139, DOI [10.26900/hsq.2.3.03, DOI 10.26900/HSQ.2.3.03]
   Kolenaty M, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141610365
   Lee H., 2023, CLIMATE CHANGE 2023, DOI DOI 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
   Lee JJ, 2024, NURS EDUC TODAY, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106290
   Leffers J, 2018, NURS OUTLOOK, V66, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.outlook.2018.02.008
   Leffers J, 2017, J NURS SCHOLARSHIP, V49, P679, DOI 10.1111/jnu.12331
   Limaye VS, 2020, HEALTH AFFAIR, V39, P2182, DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01116
   Mills Anne, 2022, Evid Based Nurs, V25, P91, DOI 10.1136/ebnurs-2021-103507
   Ministry of Education, 2022, Ministers of education and environment explore common issues and prepare for COP27
   Neal-Boylan L, 2019, J NURS EDUC, V58, P364, DOI 10.3928/01484834-20190521-09
   Ofori BY., 2023, PLOS Climate, V2, DOI [DOI 10.1371/JOURNAL.PCLM.0000215, 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000215]
   Örs M, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141711003
   Pan WL, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V405, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136874
   Sharma A, 2021, J GEN INTERN MED, V36, P3179, DOI 10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1
   Shaw E, 2021, MED TEACH, V43, P272, DOI 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1860207
   Simpson NP, 2021, ONE EARTH, V4, P489, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.03.005
   Talwar A., 2023, Journal of College Reading Learning, V53, P58, DOI DOI 10.1080/10790195.2022.2137069
   Trott CD, 2023, LOCAL ENVIRON, V28, P1131, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2023.2187363
   UNFCCC, Communicating climate change: a practitioner's guide
   United Nations Development Programme. UNDP Libya, Harnessing innovation for disaster resilience: the derna floods - Part I
   United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Protecting health from climate change. Fact sheet
   Williams SE, 2017, National climate change adaptation research plan terrestrial biodiversity: update 2017
   World Bank, Climate risk country profile
   World Health Organization, Many countries are prioritizing health and climate change but lack funds to take action
   World Health Organization, Libya: 'a disaster of epic proportions'
   Yang ZS, 2023, SUSTAIN DEV, V31, P853, DOI 10.1002/sd.2425
   Zahidi S, 2024, The global risks report 2024, V19th
NR 64
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 2
U2 2
PU BMC
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND
SN 1472-6955
J9 BMC NURS
JI BMC Nurs.
PD SEP 26
PY 2024
VL 23
IS 1
AR 676
DI 10.1186/s12912-024-02315-y
PG 17
WC Nursing
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Nursing
GA H0H5H
UT WOS:001320343500001
PM 39322950
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Niebsch, J
   von Bloh, W
   Thonicke, K
   Ramlau, R
AF Niebsch, Jenny
   von Bloh, Werner
   Thonicke, Kirsten
   Ramlau, Ronny
TI Accelerated photosynthesis routine in LPJmL4
SO GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
ID SURFACE PARAMETERIZATION SIB2; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; ATMOSPHERIC GCMS;
   MODEL; CARBON; TRANSPIRATION; REPRESENTATION; BIOSPHERE; DYNAMICS;
   SCHEME
AB The increasing impacts of climate change require strategies for climate adaptation. Dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) are one type of multi-sectorial impact model with which the effects of multiple interacting processes in the terrestrial biosphere under climate change can be studied. The complexity of DGVMs is increasing as more and more processes, especially for plant physiology, are implemented. Therefore, there is a growing demand for increasing the computational performance of the underlying algorithms as well as ensuring their numerical accuracy. One way to approach this issue is to analyse the routines which have the potential for improved computational efficiency and/or increased accuracy when applying sophisticated mathematical methods. In this paper, the Farquhar-Collatz photosynthesis model under water stress as implemented in the Lund-Potsdam-Jena managed Land DGVM (4.0.002) was examined. We additionally tested the uncertainty of most important parameter of photosynthesis as an additional approach to improve model quality. We found that the numerical solution of a nonlinear equation, so far solved with the bisection method, could be significantly improved by using Newton's method instead. The latter requires the computation of the derivative of the underlying function which is presented. Model simulations show a significantly lower number of iterations to solve the equation numerically and an overall run time reduction of the model of about 16 % depending on the chosen accuracy. Increasing the parameters theta and alpha C3 by 10 %, respectively, while keeping all other parameters at their original value, increased global gross primary production (GPP) by 2.384 and 9.542 GtC yr-1, respectively. The Farquhar-Collatz photosynthesis model forms the core component in many DGVMs and land surface models. An update in the numerical solution of the nonlinear equation in connection with adjusting globally important parameters to best known values can therefore be applied to similar photosynthesis models. Furthermore, this exercise can serve as an example for improving computationally costly routines while improving their mathematical accuracy.
C1 [Niebsch, Jenny; Ramlau, Ronny] RICAM, Altenbergerstr 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria.
   [von Bloh, Werner; Thonicke, Kirsten] Leibniz Assoc, Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany.
C3 Potsdam Institut fur Klimafolgenforschung
RP Niebsch, J (corresponding author), RICAM, Altenbergerstr 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria.
EM jenny.niebsch@oeaw.ac.at
OI Thonicke, Kirsten/0000-0001-5283-4937
FU European Regional Development Fund (ERDF); German Federal Ministry of
   Education and Research; Land Brandenburg
FX The authors gratefully acknowledge the European Regional Development
   Fund (ERDF), the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, and
   the Land Brandenburg for supporting this project by providing resources
   on the high-performance computer system at the Potsdam Institute for
   Climate Impact Research. We thank Marie Hemmen from PIK for her support
   in benchmarking the LPJmL model.
CR Andreae MO, 2001, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V15, P955, DOI 10.1029/2000GB001382
   [Anonymous], 2009, FAOSTAT Database
   Bonan GB, 2014, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V7, P2193, DOI 10.5194/gmd-7-2193-2014
   BONAN GB, 1995, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V100, P2817, DOI 10.1029/94JD02961
   Christensen BT., 2001, European Journal of Soil Science, V52, P345, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x
   COLLATZ GJ, 1992, AUST J PLANT PHYSIOL, V19, P519, DOI 10.1071/PP9920519
   COLLATZ GJ, 1991, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V54, P107, DOI 10.1016/0168-1923(91)90002-8
   Cox PM, 1998, J HYDROL, V212, P79, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00203-0
   De Kauwe MG, 2015, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V8, P431, DOI 10.5194/gmd-8-431-2015
   Dubois JJB, 2007, NEW PHYTOL, V176, P402, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02182.x
   Dufresne JL, 2013, CLIM DYNAM, V40, P2123, DOI 10.1007/s00382-012-1636-1
   ESWARAN H, 1993, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V57, P192, DOI 10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700010034x
   FARQUHAR GD, 1980, PLANTA, V149, P78, DOI 10.1007/BF00386231
   Haxeltine A, 1996, FUNCT ECOL, V10, P551, DOI 10.2307/2390165
   Haxeltine A, 1996, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V10, P693, DOI 10.1029/96GB02344
   Ito A, 2004, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V109, DOI 10.1029/2003JD004423
   Johnson JE, 2021, PHOTOSYNTH RES, V148, P101, DOI 10.1007/s11120-021-00840-4
   Kim SH, 2003, ANN BOT-LONDON, V91, P771, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcg080
   Knauer J, 2015, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V120, P1894, DOI 10.1002/2015JG003114
   Krinner G, 2005, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V19, DOI 10.1029/2003GB002199
   Lawrence P, 2013, NCARTN503STR
   Masson-Delmotte V., 2021, SUMMARY POLICYMAKERS, DOI [10.1017/9781009157896, 2021, DOI 10.1017/9781009157896,2021]
   Nemani RR, 2003, SCIENCE, V300, P1560, DOI 10.1126/science.1082750
   Niebsch Jenny, 2022, Zenodo, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.6644541
   Oliver RJ, 2022, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V15, P5567, DOI 10.5194/gmd-15-5567-2022
   Olsen Jerry, 2001, AmeriFlux, DOI 10.3334/CDIAC/LUE.NDP017
   Pearcy RW, 1997, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V20, P411, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-88.x
   Pitman AJ, 2003, INT J CLIMATOL, V23, P479, DOI 10.1002/joc.893
   Portner H.-O., CONTRIBUTION WORKING, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844, 2022, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844,2022]
   POST WM, 1982, NATURE, V298, P156, DOI 10.1038/298156a0
   Prentice I. C., TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTE, DOI [10.1007/978-3-540-32730-1, 2007, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-32730-1,2007]
   Reichstein M, 2019, NATURE, V566, P195, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1
   Reick CH, 2013, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V5, P459, DOI 10.1002/jame.20022
   Saugier B, 2001, Terrestrial Global Productivity: Past, Present and Future, P543
   Schaphoff S, 2018, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V11, P1377, DOI 10.5194/gmd-11-1377-2018
   Schwarz H. R., 2009, NUMER MATH, V7, DOI [10.1007/978-3-8348-9282-9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-8348-9282-9]
   SEILER W, 1980, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V2, P207, DOI 10.1007/BF00137988
   Sellar AA, 2019, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V11, P4513, DOI 10.1029/2019MS001739
   Sellers PJ, 1996, J CLIMATE, V9, P706, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<0706:ARLSPF>2.0.CO;2
   Sellers PJ, 1996, J CLIMATE, V9, P676, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<0676:ARLSPF>2.0.CO;2
   SELLERS PJ, 1992, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V42, P187, DOI 10.1016/0034-4257(92)90102-P
   Sitch S, 2003, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V9, P161, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00569.x
   Sitch S, 2015, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V12, P653, DOI 10.5194/bg-12-653-2015
   Sitch S., 2000, THESIS LUND U LUND
   Smith B, 2014, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V11, P2027, DOI 10.5194/bg-11-2027-2014
   Smith B, 2001, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V10, P621, DOI 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001.00256.x
   van der Werf GR, 2004, SCIENCE, V303, P73, DOI 10.1126/science.1090753
   VITOUSEK PM, 1986, BIOSCIENCE, V36, P368, DOI 10.2307/1310258
   von Bloh W, 2010, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V25, P685, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.11.012
   Walker AP, 2021, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V27, P804, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15366
NR 50
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 3
PU COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
PI GOTTINGEN
PA BAHNHOFSALLEE 1E, GOTTINGEN, 37081, GERMANY
SN 1991-959X
EI 1991-9603
J9 GEOSCI MODEL DEV
JI Geosci. Model Dev.
PD JAN 2
PY 2023
VL 16
IS 1
BP 17
EP 33
DI 10.5194/gmd-16-17-2023
PG 17
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology
GA 7M1HM
UT WOS:000906406400001
OA Green Submitted, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Baccour, S
   Ward, FA
   Albiac, J
AF Baccour, Safa
   Ward, Frank A.
   Albiac, Jose
TI Climate adaptation guidance: New roles for hydroeconomic analysis
SO SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate water stress; Adaptation patterns; Water sharing policies;
   Optimization model
ID WATER-RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; HYDRO-ECONOMIC MODEL; IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE;
   CHANGE IMPACTS; FOOD SECURITY; GROUNDWATER; BASIN; ENERGY; FRAMEWORK;
   SCARCITY
AB Climate water stress internationally challenges the goal of achieving food, energy, and water security. This challenge is elevated by population and income growth. Increased climate water stress levels reduce water supplies in many river basins and elevate competition for water among sectors. Organized information is needed to guide river basin managers and stakeholders who must plan for a changing climate through innovative water allocation policies, trade-off analysis, vulnerability assessment, capacity adaptation, and infrastructure planning. Several hydroeconomic models have been developed and applied assessing water use in different sectors, counties, cultures, and time periods. However, none to date has presented an optimization framework by which historical water use and economic benefit patterns can be replicated while presenting capacity to adapt to future climate water stresses to inform the design of policies not yet been implemented. This paper's unique contribution is to address this gap by designing and presenting results of a hydroeconomic model for which optimized base conditions exactly match observed data water use and economic welfare for several urban and agricultural uses at several locations in a large European river basin for which water use supports a population of more than 3.2 million. We develop a state-of-the arts empirical dynamic hydroeconomic optimization model to discover land and water use patterns that optimize sustained farm and city income under various levels of climate-water stress. Findings using innovative model calibration methods allow for the discovery of efficient water allocation plans as well as providing insight into marginal behavioral responses to climate water stress and water policies. Results identify that water trade policy under climate water stress provides more economically efficient water use patterns, reallocating water from lower valued uses to higher valued uses such as urban water. The Ebro River Basin in Spain is used as an example to investigate water use adaptation patterns under various levels of climate water stress. That basin's issues and challenges can be of relevance to other river basins internationally.
C1 [Baccour, Safa] CITA Govt Aragon, Dept Agr & Nat Resource Econ, Zaragoza 50059, Spain.
   [Ward, Frank A.] New Mexico State Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Agr Business, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA.
   [Albiac, Jose] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Econ Anal, Zaragoza 50005, Spain.
C3 New Mexico State University; University of Zaragoza
RP Ward, FA (corresponding author), New Mexico State Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Agr Business, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA.
EM fward@nmsu.edu; maella@unizar.es
RI Baccour, Safa/GSE-3851-2022; Albiac, Jose/J-8827-2012
OI Baccour, Safa/0000-0002-8098-7129
FU Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [RTA 2017-00082-00-00];
   European Regional Development Fund; Spanish Ministry
FX Acknowledgements This study has been financed by the project RTA
   2017-00082-00-00 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation,
   which includes partial funding from the European Regional Development
   Fund. The Spanish Ministry also granted Safa Baccour with a doctoral
   scholarship.
CR Alamanos A, 2021, WATER POLICY, V23, P617, DOI 10.2166/wp.2021.240
   Alamanos A, 2019, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V33, P2775, DOI 10.1007/s11269-019-02241-8
   [Anonymous], 2021, 2021 State of Climate Services: Water
   Appelgren B, 1999, PHYS CHEM EARTH PT B, V24, P361, DOI 10.1016/S1464-1909(99)00015-5
   Baccour S, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V327, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129459
   Bekchanov, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, P26
   Bekchanov M, 2016, WATER RESOUR ECON, V13, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.wre.2015.08.003
   Bekchanov M, 2018, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V29, P952, DOI 10.1002/ldr.2394
   Bekchanov M, 2015, WATER INT, V40, P856, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2015.1051788
   Bierkens MFP, 2019, WATER RESOUR RES, V55, P4266, DOI 10.1029/2018WR023086
   Blanco-Gutiérrez I, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V128, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.037
   Booker JF, 2012, NAT RESOUR MODEL, V25, P168, DOI 10.1111/j.1939-7445.2011.00105.x
   Boucher MA, 2012, J HYDROL, V416, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.042
   Bovolo C., 2010, EBRO RIVER BASIN HDB, P295
   Brouwer R, 2008, ECOL ECON, V66, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.009
   Carolus JF, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V271, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110976
   CEDEX, 2017, Estudio sobre identificacion de fuentes y estimacion de aportes de microplasticos al medio marino, P1
   CEDEX. (Center for Studies and Experimentation of Public Works), 2016, AN AF 2015 2016
   CHE, 2016, PLAN HIDROLOGICO DEM
   CHE. (Confederacin Hidrogrfica del Ebro), 2015, PLAN HIDROLGICO DEMA
   Crespo D, 2019, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V33, P2301, DOI 10.1007/s11269-019-02254-3
   Dagnino M, 2012, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V28, P577, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2012.665801
   del Arco Miguel Angel, 2020, ANOS HAMBRE HIST MEM
   EEA, 2007, CLIM IMP WAT RES
   Escriva-Bou A, 2017, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V143, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000735, 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000735]
   Essenfelder AH, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P1181, DOI 10.1029/2018EF000826
   Esteve P, 2015, ECOL ECON, V120, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.017
   Forero-Ortiz E, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12051779
   Foudi S, 2015, LAND USE POLICY, V42, P278, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.002
   George B, 2011, AGR WATER MANAGE, V98, P733, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.004
   Gohar AA, 2019, J HYDROL, V569, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.008
   Goor Q, 2011, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V137, P258, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000117
   Graveline N, 2020, WATER RESOUR ECON, V29, DOI 10.1016/j.wre.2019.100143
   Guan D, 2008, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V88, P1300, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.07.010
   Guan D, 2007, ECOL ECON, V61, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.022
   Harou JJ, 2008, HYDROGEOL J, V16, P1039, DOI 10.1007/s10040-008-0300-7
   Harou JJ, 2010, WATER RESOUR RES, V46, DOI 10.1029/2008WR007681
   Harou JJ, 2009, J HYDROL, V375, P627, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.037
   Heinz I, 2007, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V21, P1103, DOI 10.1007/s11269-006-9101-8
   Hérivaux C, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V128, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.058
   Hervás-Gámez C, 2020, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V34, P4577, DOI 10.1007/s11269-020-02675-5
   HOWITT RE, 1995, AM J AGR ECON, V77, P329, DOI 10.2307/1243543
   Howitt RE, 2012, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V38, P244, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.06.013
   Jalilov, 2021, J WATER RESOUR PLAN, V147, P15
   Jalilov SM, 2018, J HYDROL, V557, P407, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.040
   Jalilov SM, 2016, J HYDROL, V539, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.071
   Jalilov SM, 2015, WATER-SUI, V7, P4778, DOI 10.3390/w7094778
   Johnson T, 2009, ENVIRON MANAGE, V43, P118, DOI 10.1007/s00267-008-9205-4
   Kahil MT, 2016, J HYDROL, V539, P510, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.057
   Kahil MT, 2015, J HYDROL, V522, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.12.042
   Kirby JM, 2014, J HYDROL, V518, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.024
   Klein SJW, 2015, ENERG POLICY, V79, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.007
   Koch H, 2009, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V23, P1403, DOI 10.1007/s11269-008-9333-x
   Koutroulis AG, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V613, P271, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.074
   Kragt ME, 2011, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V26, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.04.002
   Lopez-Nicolas A, 2018, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V101, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.12.018
   Maneta MP, 2009, WATER RESOUR RES, V45, DOI 10.1029/2008WR007534
   MAPAMA. (Spanish Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Food and Environment, 2017, EVALUACIN IMPACTO CA
   Masson-Delmotte V, 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE 2021, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009157896
   Molina JL, 2013, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V67, P579, DOI 10.2166/wst.2012.598
   Nechifor, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, P20
   Peña-Haro S, 2009, J HYDROL, V373, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.024
   Pérez-Blanco CD, 2021, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104943
   PRIMAVERA JH, 1991, AMBIO, V20, P28
   Pulido-Velazquez M, 2008, ECOL ECON, V66, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.016
   Qureshi ME, 2013, FOOD POLICY, V38, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.11.003
   Rasoulkhani, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, P24
   Ray PA, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V54, P64, DOI [10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.015, 10.1016/j.e]
   Roudier P, 2016, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V135, P341, DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1570-4
   Rupérez-Moreno C, 2017, AGR WATER MANAGE, V182, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.12.008
   Sadoff C, 2013, WATER POLICY, V15, P147, DOI 10.2166/wp.2013.006
   Salman D, 2017, J HYDROL, V554, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.015
   Satoh Y, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P823, DOI 10.1002/2016EF000503
   Udias, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, P21
   Varela-Ortega C, 2016, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V16, P59, DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0720-y
   Varela-Ortega C, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P604, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.001
   Verkade JS, 2011, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V15, P3751, DOI 10.5194/hess-15-3751-2011
   Wang H, 2002, APPL ECON, V34, P759, DOI 10.1080/00036840110054044
   Ward FA, 2008, ECOL ECON, V66, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.018
   Ward FA, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V796, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148945
   Ward FA, 2013, FOOD SECUR, V5, P35, DOI 10.1007/s12571-012-0224-x
   Ward J, 2014, J HYDROL, V519, P2501, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.068
   Yang YCE, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V37, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.01.002
   Ziolkowska JR, 2015, AGR WATER MANAGE, V153, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.01.024
NR 84
TC 13
Z9 13
U1 10
U2 46
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0048-9697
EI 1879-1026
J9 SCI TOTAL ENVIRON
JI Sci. Total Environ.
PD AUG 20
PY 2022
VL 835
AR 155518
DI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155518
EA MAY 2022
PG 14
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 1Y4HM
UT WOS:000808102800007
PM 35483468
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Prichard, SJ
   Hessburg, PF
   Hagmann, RK
   Povak, NA
   Dobrowski, SZ
   Hurteau, MD
   Kane, V
   Keane, RE
   Kobziar, LN
   Kolden, CA
   North, M
   Parks, SA
   Safford, HD
   Stevens, JT
   Yocom, LL
   Churchill, DJ
   Gray, RW
   Huffman, DW
   Lake, FK
   Khatri-Chhetri, P
AF Prichard, Susan J.
   Hessburg, Paul F.
   Hagmann, R. Keala
   Povak, Nicholas A.
   Dobrowski, Solomon Z.
   Hurteau, Matthew D.
   Kane, Van R.
   Keane, Robert E.
   Kobziar, Leda N.
   Kolden, Crystal A.
   North, Malcolm
   Parks, Sean A.
   Safford, Hugh D.
   Stevens, Jens T.
   Yocom, Larissa L.
   Churchill, Derek J.
   Gray, Robert W.
   Huffman, David W.
   Lake, Frank K.
   Khatri-Chhetri, Pratima
TI Adapting western North American forests to climate change and wildfires:
   10 common questions
SO ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptive management; carbon; climate change; Climate Change and Western
   Wildfires; cultural burning; ecological resilience; forest management;
   fuel treatments; managed wildfire; mechanical thinning; prescribed fire;
   restoration; wildland fire
ID MIXED-SEVERITY FIRE; WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE; RESOURCE OBJECTIVE
   WILDFIRES; FUEL-REDUCTION TREATMENTS; YOSEMITE-NATIONAL-PARK; CALIFORNIA
   YELLOW PINE; SIERRA-NEVADA; PRESCRIBED FIRE; CONIFER FOREST; TREE
   MORTALITY
AB We review science-based adaptation strategies for western North American (wNA) forests that include restoring active fire regimes and fostering resilient structure and composition of forested landscapes. As part of the review, we address common questions associated with climate adaptation and realignment treatments that run counter to a broad consensus in the literature. These include the following: (1) Are the effects of fire exclusion overstated? If so, are treatments unwarranted and even counterproductive? (2) Is forest thinning alone sufficient to mitigate wildfire hazard? (3) Can forest thinning and prescribed burning solve the problem? (4) Should active forest management, including forest thinning, be concentrated in the wildland urban interface (WUI)? (5) Can wildfires on their own do the work of fuel treatments? (6) Is the primary objective of fuel reduction treatments to assist in future firefighting response and containment? (7) Do fuel treatments work under extreme fire weather? (8) Is the scale of the problem too great? Can we ever catch up? (9) Will planting more trees mitigate climate change in wNA forests? And (10) is post-fire management needed or even ecologically justified? Based on our review of the scientific evidence, a range of proactive management actions are justified and necessary to keep pace with changing climatic and wildfire regimes and declining forest heterogeneity after severe wildfires. Science-based adaptation options include the use of managed wildfire, prescribed burning, and coupled mechanical thinning and prescribed burning as is consistent with land management allocations and forest conditions. Although some current models of fire management in wNA are averse to short-term risks and uncertainties, the long-term environmental, social, and cultural consequences of wildfire management primarily grounded in fire suppression are well documented, highlighting an urgency to invest in intentional forest management and restoration of active fire regimes.
C1 [Prichard, Susan J.; Hessburg, Paul F.; Hagmann, R. Keala; Kane, Van R.; Khatri-Chhetri, Pratima] Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.
   [Hessburg, Paul F.] US Forest Serv PNW Res Stn, Wenatchee, WA 98801 USA.
   [Hagmann, R. Keala] Applegate Forestry LLC, Corvallis, OR 97330 USA.
   [Povak, Nicholas A.] US Forest Serv, Pacific Southwest Res Stn, Inst Forest Genet, 2480 Carson Rd, Placerville, CA 95667 USA.
   [Dobrowski, Solomon Z.] Univ Montana, Coll Forestry & Conservat, Missoula, MT 59812 USA.
   [Hurteau, Matthew D.] Univ New Mexico, Dept Biol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA.
   [Keane, Robert E.] US Forest Serv Rocky Mt Res Stn, Missoula Fire Sci Lab, Missoula, MT 59808 USA.
   [Kobziar, Leda N.] Univ Idaho, Dept Nat Resources & Soc, Moscow, ID 83844 USA.
   [Kolden, Crystal A.] Univ Calif Merced, Sch Engn, Merced, CA 95343 USA.
   [North, Malcolm] US Forest Serv Pacif Southwest Res Stn, 1731 Res Pk, Davis, CA 95618 USA.
   [Parks, Sean A.] US Forest Serv Aldo Leopold Wilderness Res Inst, Missoula, MT 59801 USA.
   [Safford, Hugh D.] US Forest Serv Pacific Southwest Res Stn, Albany, CA 94710 USA.
   [Stevens, Jens T.] US Geol Survey Ft Collins Sci Ctr, New Mexico Landscapes Field Stn, Santa Fe, NM 87544 USA.
   [Yocom, Larissa L.] Utah State Univ, Dept Wildland Resources & Ecol Ctr, Coll Agr & Appl Sci, Logan, UT 84322 USA.
   [Churchill, Derek J.] Washington State Dept Nat Resources Forest Hlth P, Olympia, WA 98504 USA.
   [Gray, Robert W.] RW Gray Consulting, Chilliwack, BC V2R2N2, Canada.
   [Huffman, David W.] Northern Arizona Univ Ecol Restorat Inst, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA.
   [Lake, Frank K.] US Forest Serv Pacific Southwest Res Stn, Arcata, CA 95521 USA.
C3 University of Washington; University of Washington Seattle; United
   States Department of Agriculture (USDA); United States Forest Service;
   University of Montana System; University of Montana; University of New
   Mexico; United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); United States
   Forest Service; University of Idaho; University of California System;
   University of California Merced; Utah System of Higher Education; Utah
   State University
RP Prichard, SJ (corresponding author), Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.
EM sprich@uw.eu
RI North, Malcolm/AAW-8897-2020; gray, robert/HJB-2567-2022; Safford,
   Hugh/ACG-9041-2022; Povak, Nicholas/JDX-0327-2023; KC,
   Pratima/HOA-8405-2023; Hurteau, Matthew/D-2301-2009; Dobrowski,
   Solomon/Q-7132-2019
OI Hurteau, Matthew/0000-0001-8457-8974; Hessburg, Paul
   Francis/0000-0002-0330-7230; North, Malcolm/0000-0002-9090-784X;
   Kobziar, Leda/0000-0002-5882-8498; Khatri-Chhetri,
   Pratima/0000-0003-4689-2027; Kane, Van R./0000-0002-0792-4850; Kolden,
   Crystal/0000-0001-7093-4552; Hagmann, Keala/0000-0002-1952-7449;
   Dobrowski, Solomon/0000-0003-2561-3850; Povak,
   Nicholas/0000-0003-1220-7095
FU US Forest Service Pacific Northwest and Pacific Southwest Research
   Stations; California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection; NSF
   [2019762]; Ecological Restoration Institute; Washington State Department
   of Natural Resources; Wilderness Society; Nature Conservancy-Oregon;
   Conservation Northwest; Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn;
   Directorate For Engineering [2019762] Funding Source: National Science
   Foundation
FX This synthesis project was funded by the US Forest Service Pacific
   Northwest and Pacific Southwest Research Stations (P. F. Hessburg, N. A.
   Povak), California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (S. J.
   Prichard, R. K. Hagmann, P. Khatri-Chhetri); Ecological Restoration
   Institute (D. Huffman, R. K. Hagmann); Washington State Department of
   Natural Resources (D. Churchill, R. K. Hagmann); the Wilderness Society
   (R. K. Hagmann); Nature Conservancy-Oregon (R. K. Hagmann); and
   Conservation Northwest (R. K. Hagmann). We thank Mike Battaglia, Ellis
   Margolis, and James Rosen for their constructive reviews and the U.S.
   Fish and Wildlife Service for assistance with publication. The authors
   also wish to acknowledge NSF's Growing Convergence Research Program
   (Award Number 2019762) for support of this work. This paper was written
   and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and
   therefore it is in the public domain and not subject to copyright.
CR Abatzoglou JT, 2018, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V27, P377, DOI 10.1071/WF17149
   Abatzoglou JT, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P11770, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1607171113
   Agee J., 1993, Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests
   Agee JK, 2005, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V211, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.01.034
   Agee JK, 2000, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V127, P55, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00116-4
   Ager AA, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V80, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.009
   Ager AA, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.007
   Ager AA, 2013, ECOSPHERE, V4, DOI 10.1890/ES13-00007.1
   Ager AA, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V267, P271, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.021
   Ager AA, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P1556, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.032
   Alig R., 1997, Environmental and Resource Economics, V9, P259, DOI 10.1023/A:1026409105660
   Allen CD, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P660, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001
   Allen CR, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P1339, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.019
   Anderson M.K., 2013, TRENDING WILD NATIVE
   [Anonymous], 2015, PNWGTR915 USDA FOR S
   Arkle RS, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V276, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.002
   Arno S.F., 1991, OVERCOMING PARADOX M
   Backer DM, 2004, CONSERV BIOL, V18, P937, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.494_1.x
   Baker W. L., 2008, Open Forest Science Journal, V1, P1, DOI 10.2174/1874398600801010001
   Baker WL, 2017, ECOSPHERE, V8, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1935
   Balch JK, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P2946, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1617394114
   Bar Massada A, 2011, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V20, P59, DOI 10.1071/WF09041
   Barbero R, 2015, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V24, P892, DOI 10.1071/WF15083
   Barnett K, 2016, FORESTS, V7, DOI 10.3390/f7100237
   Barnett K, 2016, J FOREST, V114, P610, DOI 10.5849/jof.15-111
   Barnhart S.J., 1996, Madroo, V43, P28
   Barros AMG, 2018, ECOSPHERE, V9, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2161
   Battaglia M.A., 2007, RMRSGTR202 US FOR SE
   Battaglia MA, 2018, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V422, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.04.010
   Belote RT, 2015, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V353, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.05.033
   Bentz BJ, 2010, BIOSCIENCE, V60, P602, DOI 10.1525/bio.2010.60.8.6
   BESSIE WC, 1995, ECOLOGY, V76, P747, DOI 10.2307/1939341
   Bigelow SW, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V264, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.09.031
   Bladon KD, 2018, SCIENCE, V359, P1001, DOI 10.1126/science.aar8120
   Boer MM, 2009, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.005
   Boisramé G, 2017, ECOSYSTEMS, V20, P717, DOI 10.1007/s10021-016-0048-1
   Bowman DMJS, 2020, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V1, P500, DOI 10.1038/s43017-020-0085-3
   Bowman DMJS, 2019, AMBIO, V48, P350, DOI 10.1007/s13280-018-1084-1
   Bradley CM, 2016, ECOSPHERE, V7, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1492
   Brown PM, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V445, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.04.058
   Brown RT, 2004, CONSERV BIOL, V18, P903, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.521_1.x
   Calkin DE, 2015, FOR ECOSYST, V2, DOI 10.1186/s40663-015-0033-8
   Calkin DE, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P746, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1315088111
   Campbell JL, 2012, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V10, P83, DOI 10.1890/110057
   Castro J, 2011, RESTOR ECOL, V19, P537, DOI 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00619.x
   Chmura DJ, 2011, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V261, P1121, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.040
   Chung W, 2013, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V22, P1118, DOI 10.1071/WF12138
   Churchill Derek J., 2017, U S Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report PNW-GTR, P1
   Churchill DJ, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V291, P442, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.007
   Cochrane MA, 2012, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V21, P357, DOI 10.1071/WF11079
   Cocking MI, 2014, ECOL APPL, V24, P94, DOI 10.1890/13-0473.1
   Collins BM, 2018, FIRE ECOL, V14, DOI 10.1186/s42408-018-0004-x
   Collins BM, 2011, ECOSPHERE, V2, DOI 10.1890/ES11-00026.1
   Collins BM, 2010, J FOREST, V108, P24
   Collins BM, 2009, ECOSYSTEMS, V12, P114, DOI 10.1007/s10021-008-9211-7
   Coop JD, 2020, BIOSCIENCE, V70, P659, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biaa061
   Coop JD, 2019, ECOSPHERE, V10, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2809
   Coppoletta M, 2016, ECOL APPL, V26, P686, DOI 10.1890/15-0225
   Crawford JN, 2015, HOLOCENE, V25, P1341, DOI 10.1177/0959683615584205
   Crockett JL, 2018, J CLIMATE, V31, P341, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0254.1
   DANIELS SE, 1995, INT J CONFL MANAGE, V6, P290, DOI 10.1108/eb022767
   Davies GM, 2010, J APPL ECOL, V47, P356, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01774.x
   Dellasala DA, 2004, CONSERV BIOL, V18, P976, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00529.x
   DellaSala DA, 2017, FIRE ECOL, V13, P148, DOI 10.4996/fireecology.130248173
   Donato DC, 2009, CAN J FOREST RES, V39, P823, DOI 10.1139/X09-016
   Dubay T., 2013, BREAKING BARRIERS BU
   Dunn CJ, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V404, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.08.039
   Dunn CJ, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V365, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.031
   Eisenberg C, 2019, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V7, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2019.00436
   Engber EA, 2011, FIRE ECOL, V7, P32, DOI 10.4996/fireecology.0702032
   Estes BL, 2012, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V21, P428, DOI 10.1071/WF11056
   Falk DA, 2019, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V7, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2019.00275
   Fargione J, 2021, FRONT FOR GLOB CHANG, V4, DOI 10.3389/ffgc.2021.629198
   Finney MA, 2001, FOREST SCI, V47, P219
   Finney MA, 2007, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V16, P702, DOI 10.1071/WF06063
   Fleeger WE, 2008, J FOREST, V106, P78
   Foster DE, 2020, ECOSPHERE, V11, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.3198
   Franklin JF, 2012, J FOREST, V110, P429, DOI 10.5849/jof.10-006
   Franklin JF, 2002, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V155, P399, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00575-8
   Freeman J, 2017, CONSERV BIOL, V31, P976, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12942
   Friedlingstein P, 2019, SCIENCE, V366, DOI 10.1126/science.aay8060
   Fulé PZ, 2007, J APPL ECOL, V44, P136, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01254.x
   Fulé PZ, 2014, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V23, P825, DOI 10.1111/geb.12136
   Fulé PZ, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V269, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.025
   Fulé PZ, 2001, J FOREST, V99, P24
   Goodwin MJ, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P6180, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15318
   Goodwin MJ, 2018, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V429, P617, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.07.058
   Graham R.T., 2003, HAYMAN FIRE CASE STU
   Hagmann R.K., 2021, ECOL APPL
   Hagmann RK, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V330, P158, DOI [10.1016/j.foreco.2014.0, 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.044]
   Hallema DW, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-03735-6
   Hanan EJ, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abd78e
   Hanberry BB, 2015, J FOREST, V113, P425, DOI 10.5849/jof.15-014
   Hanson CT, 2014, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V23, P1, DOI 10.1071/WF13016
   Harrod RJ, 2009, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V258, P712, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.05.011
   Hartsough BR, 2008, FOREST POLICY ECON, V10, P344, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.02.001
   Haugo RD, 2019, ECOSPHERE, V10, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2702
   Hessburg P.F., 2020, PNWGTR990 US FOR SER
   Hessburg PF, 2021, ECOL APPL, V31, DOI 10.1002/eap.2432
   Hessburg PF, 2019, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V7, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2019.00239
   Hessburg PF, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V366, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.034
   Hessburg PF, 2015, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V30, P1805, DOI 10.1007/s10980-015-0218-0
   Hessburg PF, 2005, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V211, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.016
   Hoffman KM, 2019, FIRE-BASEL, V2, DOI 10.3390/fire2030048
   Holden Z.A., 2007, Fire Ecology, V3, P18, DOI DOI 10.4996/FIREECOLOGY.0302018
   Holden ZA, 2010, FIRE ECOL, V6, P77, DOI 10.4996/fireecology.0603085
   Holl K., 2020, Primer of Ecological Restoration
   Holl KD, 2020, SCIENCE, V368, P580, DOI 10.1126/science.aba8232
   Holsinger L, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V380, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.035
   Hood S, 2015, ECOLOGY, V96, P1846, DOI 10.1890/14-0487.1
   Hudiburg T, 2009, ECOL APPL, V19, P163, DOI 10.1890/07-2006.1
   Huffman DW, 2020, FIRE ECOL, V16, DOI 10.1186/s42408-020-00077-x
   Huffman DW, 2018, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V408, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.032
   Huffman DW, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V389, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.12.036
   Huffman MR, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05843-180403
   Hunter M.E., 2014, RMRSGTR325 USDA FOR
   Hurteau M, 2009, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V7, P409, DOI 10.1890/080049
   Hurteau MD, 2008, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V6, P493, DOI 10.1890/070187
   Hurteau MD, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-39284-1
   Jain TB, 2020, FOREST SCI, V66, P157, DOI 10.1093/forsci/fxz071
   Jeronimo SMA, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V437, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.01.033
   Johnson MC, 2020, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V470, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118190
   Johnson MC, 2011, CAN J FOREST RES, V41, P1018, DOI [10.1139/X11-032, 10.1139/x11-032]
   Johnston JD, 2016, ECOSPHERE, V7, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1581
   Johnstone JF, 2016, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V14, P369, DOI 10.1002/fee.1311
   Jones GM, 2018, DIVERS DISTRIB, V24, P341, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12682
   Kalies EL, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V375, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.021
   Kane JM, 2009, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V18, P686, DOI 10.1071/WF08072
   Kane VR, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V454, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117659
   Kane VR, 2015, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V358, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.09.001
   Kane VR, 2014, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V151, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.041
   Keane R. E., 2006, Ecological Restoration, V24, P71, DOI 10.3368/er.24.2.71
   Keane RE, 2015, ECOL MODEL, V309, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.04.009
   Keane RE, 2009, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V258, P1025, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.05.035
   Keeley JE, 2018, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V27, P781, DOI 10.1071/WF18026
   Kemp KB, 2019, ECOSPHERE, V10, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2568
   Kennedy MC, 2019, ECOSPHERE, V10, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2573
   Kennedy MC, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V318, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.014
   Kent LLY, 2017, ECOSPHERE, V8, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1709
   Kent LLY, 2015, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V349, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.004
   Kimmerer RW, 2001, J FOREST, V99, P36
   Knapp EE, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V406, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.08.028
   Knapp EE, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V310, P903, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.041
   Kobziar LN, 2009, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V18, P791, DOI 10.1071/WF06097
   Kolden CA, 2019, FIRE-BASEL, V2, DOI 10.3390/fire2010009
   Kolden CA, 2019, FIRE-BASEL, V2, DOI 10.3390/fire2020030
   Kolden CA, 2010, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V19, P364, DOI 10.1071/WF08111
   Koontz MJ, 2020, ECOL LETT, V23, P483, DOI 10.1111/ele.13447
   Korb JE, 2020, FORESTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/f11050508
   Korb JE, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V454, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117663
   Krawchuk MA, 2020, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V18, P235, DOI 10.1002/fee.2190
   Kreye JK, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V314, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.11.035
   Krofcheck DJ, 2019, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V124, P3075, DOI 10.1029/2019JG005206
   Krofcheck DJ, 2017, ECOSPHERE, V8, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1663
   Lake F.K., 2018, FOREST LANDSCAPE RES, P198, DOI [10.4324/9781315111872-12, DOI 10.4324/9781315111872-12]
   Lake F.K., 2019, ENCY WILDFIRES WILDL, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-51727-8225-1
   Lake FK, 2017, J FOREST, V115, P343, DOI 10.5849/jof.2016-043R2
   Landis T.D., 2011, NAT P FOR CONS NURS
   Larson AJ, 2013, J FOREST, V111, P348, DOI 10.5849/jof.13-021
   Larson AJ, 2013, ECOL APPL, V23, P1243, DOI 10.1890/13-0066.1
   Larson AJ, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V267, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.038
   LeFevre ME, 2020, FOREST SCI, V66, P578, DOI 10.1093/forsci/fxaa014
   Lehmkuhl JF, 2007, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V246, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.071
   Levine CR, 2017, ECOL APPL, V27, P1498, DOI 10.1002/eap.1543
   Liang S, 2018, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V16, P207, DOI 10.1002/fee.1791
   Liang S, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-02686-0
   Lilley PL, 2009, OIKOS, V118, P1373, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17503.x
   Littell JS, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P1097, DOI 10.1029/2018EF000878
   Long JW, 2018, ECOL SOC, V23, DOI 10.5751/ES-10041-230210
   Lutz JA, 2020, ECOL PROCESS, V9, DOI 10.1186/s13717-020-00243-8
   Lydersen JM, 2019, FIRE ECOL, V15, DOI 10.1186/s42408-019-0060-x
   Lydersen JM, 2019, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V28, P495, DOI 10.1071/WF18141
   Lydersen JM, 2016, FIRE ECOL, V12, P99, DOI 10.4996/fireecology.1203099
   Lydersen JM, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V328, P326, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.005
   Lyons JE, 2008, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V72, P1683, DOI 10.2193/2008-141
   Mallek C, 2013, ECOSPHERE, V4, DOI [10.1890/ES13-00217.1, 10.1890/ES13-00217]
   Margolis EQ, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V375, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.011
   Marks-Block T, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V450, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117517
   Marlon JR, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, pE535, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1112839109
   Martinson E., 2003, HAYMAN FIRE CASE STU, P96
   Martinson E.J., 2013, RMRSRP103WWW USDA FO
   McCarley TR, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V391, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.02.015
   McKenzie D, 2017, ECOL APPL, V27, P26, DOI 10.1002/eap.1420
   McWethy DB, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P797, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0353-8
   Meddens AJH, 2018, BIOSCIENCE, V68, P944, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biy103
   Mell WE, 2010, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V19, P238, DOI 10.1071/WF07131
   Merschel AG, 2018, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V33, P1195, DOI 10.1007/s10980-018-0656-6
   Merschel AG, 2014, ECOL APPL, V24, P1670, DOI 10.1890/13-1585.1
   Meyer MD, 2015, J FOREST, V113, P49, DOI 10.5849/jof.14-084
   Miller JD, 2015, FIRE ECOL, V11, P12, DOI 10.4996/fireecology.1102012
   Miller JD, 2012, FIRE ECOL, V8, P41, DOI 10.4996/fireecology.0803041
   Miller RK, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P101, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0451-7
   Moghaddas JJ, 2007, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V16, P673, DOI 10.1071/WF06066
   Moreira F, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab541e
   Morgan P, 2008, ECOLOGY, V89, P717, DOI 10.1890/06-2049.1
   Morgan P, 2017, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V26, P930, DOI 10.1071/WF17023
   Moritz MA, 2014, NATURE, V515, P58, DOI 10.1038/nature13946
   Naficy CE, 2016, J FOREST, V114, P384, DOI 10.5849/jof.15-010
   Ng J, 2020, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V472, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118220
   Nigro K, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V441, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.01.020
   North M., 2009, ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT
   North MP, 2015, SCIENCE, V349, P1280, DOI 10.1126/science.aab2356
   North M, 2015, J FOREST, V113, P40, DOI 10.5849/jof.14-058
   North M, 2012, J FOREST, V110, P392, DOI 10.5849/jof.12-021
   North MP, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V432, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.09.007
   Odion DC, 2006, ECOSYSTEMS, V9, P1177, DOI 10.1007/s10021-003-0134-z
   Odion DC, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0087852
   Parisien MA, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-15961-y
   Parisien MA, 2012, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V21, P313, DOI 10.1071/WF11044
   Parisien MA, 2009, ECOL MONOGR, V79, P127, DOI 10.1890/07-1289.1
   Park J., 2019, BANFF KOOTENAY YOHO
   Parks SA, 2020, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V47, DOI 10.1029/2020GL089858
   Parks SA, 2019, ECOSPHERE, V10, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2651
   Parks SA, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9040165
   Parks SA, 2016, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V25, P182, DOI 10.1071/WF15107
   Parks SA, 2015, ECOSPHERE, V6, DOI 10.1890/ES15-00294.1
   Parks SA, 2015, ECOL APPL, V25, P1478, DOI 10.1890/14-1430.1
   Parks SA, 2014, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V23, P215, DOI 10.1071/WF13138
   Parks SA, 2014, ECOSYSTEMS, V17, P29, DOI 10.1007/s10021-013-9704-x
   Parsons RA, 2018, ANN FOREST SCI, V75, DOI 10.1007/s13595-017-0686-2
   Perry DA, 2011, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V262, P703, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.004
   Peterson D.W., 2007, PSWGTR203 USDA FOR S
   Peterson DW, 2015, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V338, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.11.016
   Pimont F, 2009, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V18, P775, DOI 10.1071/WF07130
   Pollet J, 2002, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V11, P1, DOI 10.1071/WF01045
   Povak NA, 2020, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V35, P293, DOI 10.1007/s10980-019-00947-z
   Povak NA, 2018, ECOSPHERE, V9, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2443
   Power MJ, 2018, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V6, DOI 10.3389/feart.2018.00151
   Prichard SJ, 2020, ECOL APPL, V30, DOI 10.1002/eap.2104
   Prichard SJ, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V396, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.035
   Prichard SJ, 2014, ECOL APPL, V24, P571, DOI 10.1890/13-0343.1
   Prichard SJ, 2012, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V21, P1004, DOI 10.1071/WF11121
   Prichard SJ, 2010, CAN J FOREST RES, V40, P1615, DOI 10.1139/X10-109
   Quinn-Davidson LN, 2012, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V21, P210, DOI 10.1071/WF11017
   Radeloff VC, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P3314, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1718850115
   Reilly MJ, 2018, ECOL APPL, V28, P291, DOI 10.1002/eap.1644
   Reilly MJ, 2017, ECOSPHERE, V8, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1695
   Reinhardt E, 2006, CAN J FOREST RES, V36, P2803, DOI 10.1139/X06-157
   Reinhardt ED, 2008, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V256, P1997, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.016
   Restaino JC, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V303, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.043
   Reynolds R.T., 2013, RESTORING COMPOSITIO, DOI [10.2737/RMRS-GTR-310, DOI 10.2737/RMRS-GTR-310]
   Ritchie MW, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V287, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.001
   Ritter SM, 2020, ECOSPHERE, V11, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.3177
   Rivera-Huerta H, 2016, FIRE ECOL, V12, P52, DOI 10.4996/fireecology.1201052
   Rodman KC, 2020, ECOL APPL, V30, DOI 10.1002/eap.2001
   Rollins MG, 2002, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V17, P539, DOI 10.1023/A:1021584519109
   Roos CI, 2021, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V118, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2018733118
   ROWE J S, 1973, Quaternary Research (Orlando), V3, P444, DOI 10.1016/0033-5894(73)90008-2
   Ryan KC, 2013, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V11, pE15, DOI 10.1890/120329
   Safford HD, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V274, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.02.013
   Safford H.D., 2012, Historical Environmental Variation in Conservation and Natural Resource Management, P46, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118329726.CH4
   Safford H.D., 2017, GEN TECHNICAL REPORT, DOI DOI 10.2737/PSW-GTR-256
   Safford HD, 2009, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V258, P773, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.05.024
   Savage M, 2013, CAN J FOREST RES, V43, P570, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2012-0404
   Schmidt DA, 2008, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V255, P3170, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.023
   Schoennagel T, 2004, BIOSCIENCE, V54, P661, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0661:TIOFFA]2.0.CO;2
   Schoennagel T, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P4582, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1617464114
   Schoennagel T, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P10706, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0900991106
   Scholl AE, 2010, ECOL APPL, V20, P362, DOI 10.1890/08-2324.1
   Schultz CA, 2019, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V28, P874, DOI 10.1071/WF19040
   Schultz CA, 2012, J FOREST, V110, P381, DOI 10.5849/jof.11-082
   Shive KL, 2018, ECOL APPL, V28, P1626, DOI 10.1002/eap.1756
   Smith AMS, 2016, BIOSCIENCE, V66, P130, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biv182
   Sneeuwjagt RJ, 2013, FIRE ECOL, V9, P14, DOI 10.4996/fireecology.0902014
   Sowerwine J, 2019, J AGRIC FOOD SYST CO, V9, P167, DOI 10.5304/jafscd.2019.09B.013
   Spies Thomas A., 2018, General Technical Report 966
   Stan AB, 2014, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V23, P686, DOI 10.1071/WF13089
   Stenzel JE, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P3985, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14716
   Stephens S. L., 2016, Ecosphere, V7, pe01584, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1584
   Stephens SL, 2021, BIOSCIENCE, V71, P85, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biaa134
   Stephens SL, 2020, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V18, P354, DOI 10.1002/fee.2218
   Stephens SL, 2012, BIOSCIENCE, V62, P549, DOI 10.1525/bio.2012.62.6.6
   Stephens SL, 2010, ENVIRON RES LETT, V5, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024003
   Stephens SL, 2009, ECOL APPL, V19, P305, DOI 10.1890/07-1755.1
   Stephens SL, 2005, J FOREST, V103, P357
   Stephens SL, 2005, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V215, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.070
   Stevens JT, 2020, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V29, P944, DOI 10.1111/geb.13079
   Stevens JT, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V406, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.08.051
   Stevens JT, 2016, ECOSPHERE, V7, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1445
   Stevens JT, 2014, CAN J FOREST RES, V44, P843, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2013-0460
   Stevens-Rumann CS, 2019, FIRE ECOL, V15, DOI 10.1186/s42408-019-0032-1
   Stevens-Rumann CS, 2016, CAN J FOREST RES, V46, P1375, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0185
   Stevens-Rumann CS, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V267, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.003
   Stine P., 2014, The ecology and management of moist mixed-conifer forests in eastern Oregon and Washington: a synthesis of the relevant biophysical science and implications for future land management
   Stockdale CA, 2019, ECOSPHERE, V10, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2774
   Stoddard MT, 2020, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V29, P190, DOI 10.1071/WF19067
   Storm L., 2006, Ecological Restoration, V24, P256, DOI 10.3368/er.24.4.256
   Striplin R, 2020, FIRE ECOL, V16, DOI 10.1186/s42408-020-00071-3
   Syphard AD, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0033954
   Taylor AH, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P13684, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1609775113
   Teske CC, 2012, FIRE ECOL, V8, P82, DOI 10.4996/fireecology.0802082
   Thode AE, 2011, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V20, P223, DOI 10.1071/WF09060
   Thompson DK, 2017, CAN J FOREST RES, V47, P957, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0475
   Thompson JR, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P10743, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0700229104
   Thompson MP, 2016, FORESTS, V7, DOI 10.3390/f7030064
   Trauernicht C, 2015, ECOL EVOL, V5, P1908, DOI 10.1002/ece3.1494
   TURNER MG, 1994, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V9, P59, DOI 10.1007/BF00135079
   Turner MG, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P11319, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1902841116
   Tymstra C, 2020, PROG DISASTER SCI, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100045
   Underwood S., 2003, Ecological Restoration, V21, P278, DOI 10.3368/er.21.4.278
   United States Department of Agriculture, 2001, NAT FIR PLAN RES DEV
   United States Department of Agricuture and United States Department of Interior, 2021, NAT COH WILDL FIR MA
   Vaillant NM, 2017, J FOREST, V115, P300, DOI 10.5849/jof.16-067
   Vaillant NM, 2009, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V18, P165, DOI 10.1071/WF06065
   Van de Water K, 2011, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V262, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.03.026
   van Mantgem PJ, 2018, ECOL APPL, V28, P1730, DOI 10.1002/eap.1778
   van Wagtendonk JW, 2012, FIRE ECOL, V8, P11, DOI 10.4996/fireecology.0801011
   Veldman JW, 2019, SCIENCE, V366, DOI 10.1126/science.aay7976
   Walker RB, 2018, ECOSPHERE, V9, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2182
   Westerling AL, 2016, PHILOS T R SOC B, V371, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2015.0178
   Westlind DJ, 2021, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V480, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118645
   White C.A., 1985, 3 NAT PARKS BRANCH
   Whitman E, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-55036-7
   Williams MA, 2011, ECOL MONOGR, V81, P63, DOI 10.1890/10-0256.1
   Yocom LL, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V449, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.06.037
   Zald HSJ, 2018, ECOL APPL, V28, P1068, DOI 10.1002/eap.1710
NR 316
TC 153
Z9 171
U1 41
U2 193
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1051-0761
EI 1939-5582
J9 ECOL APPL
JI Ecol. Appl.
PD DEC
PY 2021
VL 31
IS 8
AR e02433
DI 10.1002/eap.2433
EA OCT 2021
PG 30
WC Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA XF7IO
UT WOS:000706883300001
PM 34339088
OA Green Published
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Dhyani, S
   Kadaverugu, R
   Dhyani, D
   Verma, P
   Pujari, P
AF Dhyani, Shalini
   Kadaverugu, Rakesh
   Dhyani, Deepak
   Verma, Parikshit
   Pujari, Paras
TI Predicting impacts of climate variability on habitats of <i>Hippophae
   salicifolia</i> (D. Don) (Seabuckthorn) in Central Himalayas: Future
   challenges
SO ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS
LA English
DT Article
DE Hippophae salicifolia; Central Himalayas; Species distribution modeling;
   Climate change; Conservation planning
ID SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; SEA BUCKTHORN; RHAMNOIDES L.; SUITABLE
   HABITAT; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; SUITABILITY; RESPONSES; BERRIES;
   SHIFTS
AB Climate variability is the most influential driver altering the natural habitats of species leading to worldwide biodiversity loss. Understanding the climatic niche of vulnerable species and predicting its shift due to impending climate change is highly important to assess the damage. It also helps to plan and implement long term ex-situ or in-situ strategies to protect the species and its fragile habitats. Though, various important species of Himalayas are exploited for their economic and medicinal benefits, yet the impact of climate change on species have not been efficiently documented. Present study, is an attempt to understand the impact of climate vulnerability on habitat suitability of Hippophae salicifolia, a multipurpose species that grows particularly on the riparian fronts of river Ganga in Central Himalayas, using species distribution modeling. The Maximum entropy (MaxEnt) model with field observed occurrence locations of the species and CMIP5 (Couple Model Inter-comparison Project) derived bioclimatic variables were used for the study. The predictions were done on the geographic area of Central Himalayas in Uttarakhand state of India according to four IPCC RCPs (Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change, Representative Concentration Pathways) for the future periods 2050 and 2070. Our results show that the estimated potential (threshold-1) area along the riparian fronts is around 2050 km(2) for the current period. Whereas, for the future years, the suitable area is likely to be lost by 87% for all climate change scenarios making H. salicifolia highly vulnerable in it' s actual habitats. An upward shift in the habitat of the species by 1700 m amsl (2800-4500 m amsl) is also predicted. Shift of species from its micro-habitats due to climate reflects unusual patterns and demands the vital need of applying climate adaptive management for habitat conservation. Present study presents a baseline database for broad-scale applicability of riparian front restoration for species conservation.
C1 [Dhyani, Shalini; Pujari, Paras] Natl Environm Engn Res Inst, CSIR, Water Technol & Management Div, Nagpur 440020, Maharashtra, India.
   [Kadaverugu, Rakesh] Natl Environm Engn Res Inst, CSIR, Clean Technol & Modeling Div, Nagpur 440020, Maharashtra, India.
   [Dhyani, Deepak] Soc Conserving Planet & Life Srinagar Garhwal, Srinagar, Uttarakhand, India.
   [Verma, Parikshit] Natl Environm Engn Res Insan, Business Dev Grp, CSIR, Nagpur 440020, Maharashtra, India.
C3 Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR) - India; CSIR -
   National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI); Council
   of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR) - India; CSIR - National
   Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI); Council of
   Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR) - India; CSIR - National
   Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI)
RP Dhyani, S (corresponding author), Natl Environm Engn Res Inst, CSIR, Water Technol & Management Div, Nagpur 440020, Maharashtra, India.; Kadaverugu, R (corresponding author), Natl Environm Engn Res Inst, CSIR, Clean Technol & Modeling Div, Nagpur 440020, Maharashtra, India.
EM s_dhyani@neeri.res.in; r_kadaverugu@neeri.res.in; p_verma@neeri.res.in;
   pr_pujari@neeri.res.in
RI kadaverugu, rakesh/HGU-7893-2022; Dhyani, Shalini/AAS-3229-2020
OI Dhyani, Shalini/0000-0002-0915-5733; KADAVERUGU,
   RAKESH/0000-0002-4110-7176
FU Department of Science and Technology, Govt of India; TSBF/GEF/CIAT/UNEP;
   Rufford Small Grants Programme, UK [10326]; DST SYSP [SP/YO/024/2008]
FX Financial support for the field work from Department of Science and
   Technology, Govt of India (2002-2006); TSBF/GEF/CIAT/UNEP (2004-2007);
   DST SYSP (No. SP/YO/024/2008) (2009-2012) and Rufford Small Grants
   Programme, UK (Grant No. 10326) (2014-2015), is thankfully acknowledged.
CR Adhikari D, 2012, ECOL ENG, V40, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.12.004
   Akhter S, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V60, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.027
   Alam Zeb Alam Zeb, 2004, Journal of Biological Sciences, V4, P687
   Anderegg WRL, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V208, P674, DOI 10.1111/nph.13477
   [Anonymous], 2017, Geographic Resources Analysis Support System
   [Anonymous], PAINTING MAPS BATS S
   [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis
   [Anonymous], 2016, Appl. Ecol. Environ. Sci.
   Ansari A., 2003, INT WORKSHOP UNDERUT, V6
   Babar S, 2012, CURR SCI INDIA, V102, P1157
   Bobrowski M, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10060814
   Brijlal A. P., 2001, APPL SEABUCKTHORN AM, P239
   Butchart SHM, 2010, SCIENCE, V328, P1164, DOI 10.1126/science.1187512
   Chakraborty A, 2016, ECOL ENG, V97, P593, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.006
   Champion H.G., 1968, REVISED SURVEY FORES
   Christensen JH, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P847
   Chu QC, 2003, CHROMATOGRAPHIA, V58, P67, DOI 10.1365/s10337-003-0011-0
   Coetzee BWT, 2009, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V18, P701, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00485.x
   Core-Team, 2017, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
   Dawson TP, 2011, SCIENCE, V332, P53, DOI 10.1126/science.1200303
   De Leo G.A., 1997, CONSERV ECOL, V1, P3, DOI DOI 10.5751/ES-00022-010103
   Deb JC, 2017, ECOL EVOL, V7, P2238, DOI 10.1002/ece3.2846
   Deb JC, 2017, ENVIRON MANAGE, V60, P422, DOI 10.1007/s00267-017-0884-6
   Dhyani D, 2010, J ETHNOPHARMACOL, V127, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.jep.2009.10.037
   Dhyani D., 2008, EXPLORATION MULTIPLI
   Dhyani D, 2007, CURR SCI INDIA, V92, P1148
   Dhyani D, 2013, J MT SCI-ENGL, V10, P464, DOI 10.1007/s11629-013-2424-z
   Dhyani S, 2016, ADV NAT TECH HAZ RES, V42, P507, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-43633-3_22
   Dhyani S, 2016, ENERGY ECOL ENVIRON, V1, P109, DOI 10.1007/s40974-016-0008-9
   Díaz S, 2018, SCIENCE, V359, P270, DOI 10.1126/science.aap8826
   Díaz S, 2015, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V14, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002
   Durham University, 2015, INT SPEC DISTR MOD T, V46
   Elith J, 2006, ECOGRAPHY, V29, P129, DOI 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
   Elith J, 2011, DIVERS DISTRIB, V17, P43, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
   Elith J, 2009, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V40, P677, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159
   Fivaz FP, 2014, J INSECT CONSERV, V18, P427, DOI 10.1007/s10841-014-9652-6
   FSI (Forest Survey of India), 2017, IND STAT FOR REP
   Garcia Molinos Jorge, 2016, Nature Climate Change, V6, P83, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2769
   Gaur R., 1999, KEYS GEOG, V6
   Gayle E., 2008, SEA BUCKTHORN HERB G, V78, P1
   Gent PR, 2011, J CLIMATE, V24, P4973, DOI 10.1175/2011JCLI4083.1
   Guillera-Arroita G, 2015, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V24, P276, DOI 10.1111/geb.12268
   Guisan A, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P993, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x
   Hanewinkel M, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P203, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1687, 10.1038/nclimate1687]
   Hector A, 2001, OECOLOGIA, V129, P624, DOI 10.1007/s004420100759
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   Huang JH, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9010009
   Hughes AC, 2017, ECOSPHERE, V8, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1624
   Hughes L, 2000, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V15, P56, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01764-4
   IUCN, 2015, UNEP WCMC TECHN REP
   Jaryan V., 2013, CURR SCI, P1282
   JAYNES ET, 1957, PHYS REV, V106, P620, DOI 10.1103/PhysRev.106.620
   Kanagaraj R, 2011, ECOGRAPHY, V34, P970, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06482.x
   Kershaw RA, 1973, Quantitative and dynamic plant ecology
   Khanna L., 2000, HDB OF FORESTRY
   Kumar KK, 2011, CLIM DYNAM, V36, P2159, DOI 10.1007/s00382-010-0974-0
   Kumar S, 2014, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V103, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2014.02.007
   Lebeda A., 2005, MULTIPURPOSE WONDER, V2, P533
   Lindner M, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P698, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.023
   Liu CR, 2013, J BIOGEOGR, V40, P778, DOI 10.1111/jbi.12058
   Malcolm JR, 2006, CONSERV BIOL, V20, P538, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00364.x
   Myers N, 2000, NATURE, V403, P853, DOI 10.1038/35002501
   Naimi B., 2017, Package usdm
   Narouei-Khandan HA, 2016, EUR J PLANT PATHOL, V144, P655, DOI 10.1007/s10658-015-0804-7
   NEERI, 2017, ASS WAT QUAL SED AN
   Panigrahy S, 2010, Alpine Treeline Atlas of Indian Himalaya: Uttarakhand, India
   Panigrahy S, 2010, TROP ECOL, V51, P87
   Parmesan C, 2006, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V37, P637, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
   Pereira HM, 2013, SCIENCE, V339, P277, DOI 10.1126/science.1229931
   Pereira HM, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P25, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-042911-093511
   Peterson A.T., 2005, CLIMATE CHANGE BIODI, P211
   Phillips SJ, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V190, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
   Phillips SJ, 2004, P 21 INT C MACH LEAR, P655, DOI DOI 10.1145/1015330.1015412
   Pramanik M, 2018, CLIM RISK MANAG, V19, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2017.11.002
   Raffo A, 2004, EUR FOOD RES TECHNOL, V219, P360, DOI 10.1007/s00217-004-0984-4
   Rajvanshi A., 2012, TECHNICAL REPORT, P203
   Ranjith A, 2006, J AM OIL CHEM SOC, V83, P359, DOI 10.1007/s11746-006-1213-z
   Ranjitkar S, 2014, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V1, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2014.07.001
   Rastogi A., 1993, CONSERVATION STATUS, P44
   Rathor R, 2015, CELL STRESS CHAPERON, V20, P821, DOI 10.1007/s12192-015-0603-2
   Remya K, 2015, ECOL ENG, V82, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.053
   Rongsen L., 1992, SEABUCKTHOM MULTIPUR
   Root TL, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P7465, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0502286102
   Roy PS, 2015, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V7, P2401, DOI 10.3390/rs70302401
   Sabir SM, 2005, ITAL J FOOD SCI, V17, P455
   Singh CP, 2012, CURR SCI INDIA, V102, P559
   Singh KN, 2008, J ETHNOPHARMACOL, V115, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.jep.2007.09.017
   Singh V., 2008, MULTIPURPOSE WONDER, V3
   Stohlgren TJ, 2010, RISK ANAL, V30, P224, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01343.x
   Syfert MM, 2014, BIOL CONSERV, V177, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.012
   Thomas CD, 2004, NATURE, V427, P145, DOI 10.1038/nature02121
   Thompson I., 2009, SECRETARIAT CONVENTI
   Tiitinen KM, 2006, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V54, P2508, DOI 10.1021/jf053177r
   TISC, 2001, TECH REP
   Walther GR, 2002, NATURE, V416, P389, DOI 10.1038/416389a
   Xing JF, 2002, FITOTERAPIA, V73, P644, DOI 10.1016/S0367-326X(02)00221-6
NR 96
TC 16
Z9 16
U1 1
U2 26
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1574-9541
EI 1878-0512
J9 ECOL INFORM
JI Ecol. Inform.
PD NOV
PY 2018
VL 48
BP 135
EP 146
DI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2018.09.003
PG 12
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA HE7TC
UT WOS:000453641900014
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Meiyappan, P
   Dalton, M
   O'Neill, BC
   Jain, AK
AF Meiyappan, Prasanth
   Dalton, Michael
   O'Neill, Brian C.
   Jain, Atul K.
TI Spatial modeling of agricultural land use change at global scale
SO ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
LA English
DT Article
DE Prediction; Drivers; Integrated Assessment; Spatially explicit;
   Validation; Land change
ID COVER CHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; EXPLICIT; SYSTEM; INTENSIFICATION;
   BIODIVERSITY; EMISSIONS; SCENARIOS; DYNAMICS; PATTERNS
AB Long-term modeling of agricultural land use is central in global scale assessments of climate change, food security, biodiversity, and climate adaptation and mitigation policies. We present a global-scale dynamic land use allocation model and show that it can reproduce the broad spatial features of the past 100 years of evolution of cropland and pastureland patterns. The modeling approach integrates economic theory, observed land use history, and data on both socioeconomic and biophysical determinants of land use change, and estimates relationships using long-term historical data, thereby making it suitable for long-term projections. The underlying economic motivation is maximization of expected profits by hypothesized landowners within each grid cell. The model predicts fractional land use for cropland and pastureland within each grid cell based on socioeconomic and biophysical driving factors that change with time. The model explicitly incorporates the following key features: (1) land use competition, (2) spatial heterogeneity in the nature of driving factors across geographic regions, (3) spatial heterogeneity in the relative importance of driving factors and previous land use patterns in determining land use allocation, and (4) spatial and temporal autocorrelation in land use patterns.
   We show that land use allocation approaches based solely on previous land use history (but disregarding the impact of driving factors), or those accounting for both land use history and driving factors by mechanistically fitting models for the spatial processes of land use change do not reproduce well long-term historical land use patterns. With an example application to the terrestrial carbon cycle, we show that such inaccuracies in land use allocation can translate into significant implications for global environmental assessments. The modeling approach and its evaluation provide an example that can be useful to the land use, Integrated Assessment, and the Earth system modeling communities. 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
C1 [Meiyappan, Prasanth; Jain, Atul K.] Univ Illinois, Dept Atmospher Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.
   [Dalton, Michael] NOAA, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Alaska Fisheries Sci Ctr, Seattle, WA 98115 USA.
   [O'Neill, Brian C.] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Climate & Global Dynam Div, Boulder, CO 80307 USA.
C3 University of Illinois System; University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign;
   National Oceanic Atmospheric Admin (NOAA) - USA; National Center
   Atmospheric Research (NCAR) - USA
RP Meiyappan, P (corresponding author), 105 South Gregory St,Atmospher Sci Bldg, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.
EM meiyapp2@illinois.edu; jain1@illinois.edu
RI Meiyappan, Prasanth/F-5422-2012; O'Neill, Brian/E-6531-2013; Jain,
   Atul/D-2851-2016
OI Meiyappan, Prasanth/0000-0002-8014-0999; Jain, Atul/0000-0002-4051-3228
FU National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Land Cover and Land
   Use Change Program; National Science Foundation (NSF) Regional Earth
   System modeling program; Directorate For Geosciences; Div Atmospheric &
   Geospace Sciences [1243095, 1243071] Funding Source: National Science
   Foundation
FX The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Land Cover and
   Land Use Change Program and the National Science Foundation (NSF)
   Regional Earth System modeling program supported this work. The findings
   and conclusions in the paper are those of the authors and do not
   necessarily represent the views of the National Marine Fisheries
   Service, NOAA.
CR Agarwal C., 2002, A review and assessment of land use change models: dynamics of space, time, and human choice, P12
   Alexander LV, 2006, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V111, DOI 10.1029/2005JD006290
   Alkemade R, 2009, ECOSYSTEMS, V12, P374, DOI 10.1007/s10021-009-9229-5
   [Anonymous], 2008, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY
   [Anonymous], INT J CLIMATOL
   [Anonymous], 1999, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(99)00018-7
   [Anonymous], 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, DOI DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0157-y
   [Anonymous], 48 GTAP PURD U DEP A
   [Anonymous], OFF RES DEV PUBL
   [Anonymous], 8 GTAP
   [Anonymous], FNU65 HAMB U
   [Anonymous], J CLIM
   [Anonymous], WP4 MADD PROJ
   [Anonymous], J LAND USE SCI
   [Anonymous], CURR OPIN ENV SUST
   [Anonymous], GEOPHYS RES LETT
   [Anonymous], THESIS MIT CAMBRIDGE
   [Anonymous], 5 GEO UNEP
   Augustin NH, 1996, J APPL ECOL, V33, P339, DOI 10.2307/2404755
   Bennett EM, 2001, BIOSCIENCE, V51, P227, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0227:HIOEPA]2.0.CO;2
   Bouwman AF., 2006, Integrated modeling of global environmental change
   Breen B., 1996, Regression Models: Censored, Sample Selected or Truncated Data
   Briassoulis H., 2000, Analysis of Land Use Change: Theoretical and Modeling Approaches
   Brown D.G., 2014, Advancing Land Change Modeling: Opportunities and Research Requirements, DOI DOI 10.17226/18385
   Bruinsma J., 2009, P TECHNICAL M EXPERT, P1
   Dai AG, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V116, DOI 10.1029/2010JD015541
   Dai AG, 2011, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V2, P45, DOI 10.1002/wcc.81
   Dormann CF, 2007, ECOGRAPHY, V30, P609, DOI 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x
   Ekström M, 2007, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V11, P1069, DOI 10.5194/hess-11-1069-2007
   Fischer G., 2012, Global Agro-ecological Zones (GAEZ v3.0): Model Documentation"
   Foley JA, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P570, DOI 10.1126/science.1111772
   Foley JA, 2011, NATURE, V478, P337, DOI 10.1038/nature10452
   Friedman J, 2007, ANN APPL STAT, V1, P302, DOI 10.1214/07-AOAS131
   Friedman J, 2010, J STAT SOFTW, V33, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v033.i01
   Fuchs R., 2014, Global Change Biology
   Geist H, 2006, GLO CH IGBP, P41
   Goldewijk KK, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P861, DOI 10.1007/s10980-013-9877-x
   Goldewijk KK, 2011, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V20, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00587.x
   Goldewijk KK, 2010, HOLOCENE, V20, P565, DOI 10.1177/0959683609356587
   Green RE, 2005, SCIENCE, V307, P550, DOI 10.1126/science.1106049
   Hallgren W, 2013, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V40, P1624, DOI 10.1002/grl.50352
   Havlík P, 2011, ENERG POLICY, V39, P5690, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.030
   Heistermann M, 2006, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V114, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.015
   Hibbard K, 2010, INT J CLIMATOL, V30, P2118, DOI 10.1002/joc.2150
   Houghton R.A., 2008, TRENDS: A Compendium of Data on Global Change
   Hubbard KG, 1999, J PROD AGRIC, V12, P650, DOI 10.2134/jpa1999.0650
   Hunter JE, 2002, HUM COMMUN RES, V28, P552, DOI 10.1093/hcr/28.4.552
   Hurtt GC, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P117, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0153-2
   Irwin EG, 2001, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V85, P7, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00200-6
   Jain AK, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P2893, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12207
   JAMES FC, 1990, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V21, P129, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.21.1.129
   Keys E, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P320, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.04.004
   Kindermann G, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P10302, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0710616105
   Kuemmerle T, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P484, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.002
   Lambin EF, 2001, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V11, P261, DOI [10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3, 10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105459]
   Lambin EF, 2003, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V28, P205, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105459
   Lambin EF, 2000, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V82, P321, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00235-8
   Lambin EF, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P3465, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1100480108
   Lancaster T, 2000, J ECONOMETRICS, V95, P391, DOI 10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00044-5
   Le Quéré C, 2014, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V6, P235, DOI 10.5194/essd-6-235-2014
   Lesschen J.P., 2005, Statistical methods for analyzing the spatial dimension of changes in land use and farming systems
   Letourneau A, 2012, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V33, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.007
   Lotze-Campen H, 2010, ECOL MODEL, V221, P2188, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.10.002
   Lubowski RN, 2008, LAND ECON, V84, P529, DOI 10.3368/le.84.4.529
   MEA, 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING, V5
   Meiyappan P, 2012, FRONT EARTH SCI-PRC, V6, P122, DOI 10.1007/s11707-012-0314-2
   Melillo JM, 2009, SCIENCE, V326, P1397, DOI 10.1126/science.1180251
   Mertens KC, 2003, INT J REMOTE SENS, V24, P4241, DOI 10.1080/01431160310001595073
   Meyfroidt P, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.04.003
   Moss RH, 2010, NATURE, V463, P747, DOI 10.1038/nature08823
   Mu JHE, 2013, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V18, P713, DOI 10.1007/s11027-012-9384-4
   O'Neill B., 2012, Global Land Project (GLP) News Letter
   O'Neill BC, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P17521, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1004581107
   Olesen JE, 2002, EUR J AGRON, V16, P239, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00004-7
   Overmars KP, 2003, ECOL MODEL, V164, P257, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00070-X
   Parker DC, 2003, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V93, P314, DOI 10.1111/1467-8306.9302004
   Pereira HM, 2010, SCIENCE, V330, P1496, DOI 10.1126/science.1196624
   Phalan B, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P1289, DOI 10.1126/science.1208742
   Pielke RA, 2011, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V2, P828, DOI 10.1002/wcc.144
   Pomazi I., 2012, Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, V61, P343, DOI DOI 10.1787/1999155X
   Portmann FT, 2010, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V24, DOI 10.1029/2008GB003435
   Ramankutty N, 1999, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V13, P997, DOI 10.1029/1999GB900046
   Ramankutty N, 2002, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V11, P377, DOI 10.1046/j.1466-822x.2002.00294.x
   Ramankutty N., 2012, Global Cropland and Pasture Data from 1700-2007
   Ray DK, 2012, NAT COMMUN, V3, DOI 10.1038/ncomms2296
   Reilly J, 2012, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V46, P5672, DOI 10.1021/es2034729
   Rokityanskiy D, 2007, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V74, P1057, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.022
   Ronneberger K, 2009, ENVIRON MODEL ASSESS, V14, P149, DOI 10.1007/s10666-008-9177-z
   Rounsevell MDA, 2014, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V5, P117, DOI 10.5194/esd-5-117-2014
   Rounsevell MDA, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P840, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.010
   Sarofim MC, 2011, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V2, P27, DOI 10.1002/wcc.93
   Schaldach R, 2011, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V35, P2401, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.048
   Schlenker W, 2006, REV AGR ECON, V28, P391, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00304.x
   Siebert S, 2005, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V9, P535, DOI 10.5194/hess-9-535-2005
   Smith P, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P2941, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0127
   Souty F, 2012, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V5, P1297, DOI 10.5194/gmd-5-1297-2012
   Souty F., 2013, Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, V6, P6975
   Stehfest E, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V95, P83, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9534-6
   Taylor KE, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P485, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
   Tebaldi C, 2006, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V79, P185, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9051-4
   TEEB-The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB
   Thenkabail PS, 2009, INT J REMOTE SENS, V30, P3679, DOI 10.1080/01431160802698919
   Tilman D, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P20260, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1116437108
   Van Asselen S, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P3648, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12331
   van Asselen S, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P3125, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02759.x
   van Vuuren DP, 2012, ENVIRON RES LETT, V7, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/7/2/024012
   Verburg P. H., 2004, GeoJournal, V61, P309, DOI 10.1007/s10708-004-4946-y
   Verburg PH, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1067, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9745-0
   Verburg PH, 2011, ENVIRON RES LETT, V6, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/034019
   Wilkenskjeld S, 2014, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V11, P4817, DOI 10.5194/bg-11-4817-2014
   Zou H, 2005, J R STAT SOC B, V67, P301, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x
NR 111
TC 94
Z9 104
U1 5
U2 112
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0304-3800
EI 1872-7026
J9 ECOL MODEL
JI Ecol. Model.
PD NOV 10
PY 2014
VL 291
BP 152
EP 174
DI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.027
PG 23
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA AR2AU
UT WOS:000343386500014
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU McGlone, MS
   Duncan, RP
   Heenan, PB
AF McGlone, MS
   Duncan, RP
   Heenan, PB
TI Endemism, species selection and the origin and distribution of the
   vascular plant flora of New Zealand
SO JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
LA English
DT Article; Proceedings Paper
CT XVIth International Botanical Congress (IBC)
CY AUG, 1999
CL ST LOUIS, MISSOURI
DE New Zealand; biogeography; vascular plants; alpine plants; dispersal;
   endemism
ID NORTH-ISLAND; PHYLOGENETIC-RELATIONSHIPS; GLACIAL CLIMATES;
   NATURAL-HISTORY; ALPINE FAULT; EVOLUTION; BIOGEOGRAPHY;
   SCROPHULARIACEAE; COMPLEX; SEQUENCES
AB Aim To evaluate competing views on the origin and distribution of the New Zealand flora by testing the hypothesis that the geographical distribution of species is unrelated to ecological traits such as habitat requirements and dispersal capabilities.
   Location The New Zealand archipelago.
   Methods An analysis of the factors correlated with distribution and endemism for alpine plants within New Zealand, and for the New Zealand biota as a whole.
   Results Woody plants are highly endemic; nonendemic plants tend to be herbaceous and are concentrated among the highly dispersible ferns and fern allies, orchids and wetland plants. These groups make up 32% of the total flora but contribute 78% of nonendemics. Alpine plants with wide spatial distribution tend to have greater altitudinal ranges, a broader habitat preference and better dispersal ability.
   Main conclusions Most vascular plants reached New Zealand by long-distance transoceanic dispersal, probably during the Late Miocene to early Pleistocene period. During the Miocene and Pliocene, similar climates and landscapes to those of Australia and northern island groups, and highly invasible terrain, permitted dispersal of woody plants. Cooling climates and formation of a more mountainous, more compact landscape after that time reduced dispersal of woody plants and favoured herbaceous, wetland and highly dispersible plant groups. The prominence of dispersal has led to intense selective immigration, and is responsible for many characteristic features of the flora. Species selection by glacial-interglacial cycles has restricted acquisition or retention of cool or arid climate adaptations, particularly in the lowland flora. Endemic and range disjunction patterns in the New Zealand mainland are not, in general, directly caused by Pliocene inundations or the faulting and associated horizontal displacement of terrain that has continued since the Miocene. They have arisen mainly through Pleistocene extinctions, speciation and dispersal, and some patterns are strongly linked to repeated glaciation. Endemic centres are associated with differentiated terrain and climates providing isolation, distinctive environments, and habitat continuity conducive to speciation.
C1 Landcare Res, Lincoln 8152, New Zealand.
   Lincoln Univ, Soil Plant & Ecol Sci Div, Ecol & Evolutionary Grp, Canterbury, New Zealand.
C3 Landcare Research - New Zealand; Lincoln University - New Zealand
RP McGlone, MS (corresponding author), Landcare Res, POB 69, Lincoln 8152, New Zealand.
RI Heenan, Peter/AAS-1048-2021; Duncan, Richard/ABD-4099-2020; Duncan,
   Richard/E-7899-2013
OI Duncan, Richard/0000-0003-2295-449X
CR ADAMS CJD, 1979, ORIGIN SO ALPS, P73
   [Anonymous], 2002, Vegetation of New Zealand
   [Anonymous], 1989, WETLAND PLANTS NZ
   [Anonymous], ROYAL SOC NZ MISCELL
   [Anonymous], 1996, The field guide to the birds of New Zealand
   [Anonymous], 1998, ROYAL SOC NZ MISCELL
   [Anonymous], 1999, PANBIOGEOGRAPHY TRAC
   [Anonymous], 1965, ISLAND LIFE
   [Anonymous], CONSERVATION CHATHAM
   [Anonymous], 1995, New Zealand alpine plants
   BENNETT K.D., 1997, Evolution and ecology: the pace of life
   BENNETT KD, 1991, J BIOGEOGR, V18, P103, DOI 10.2307/2845248
   Breitwieser I, 1999, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V37, P399, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1999.9512644
   Brownsey P.J., 1989, New Zealand ferns and allied plants
   BURROWS C. J., 1965, TUATARA, V13, P9
   BURROWS CJ, 1994, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V32, P349
   BUSSELL MR, 1986, NEW ZEAL J GEOL GEOP, V29, P471, DOI 10.1080/00288306.1986.10422168
   CAYZER LW, UNPUB AUSTR J SYSTEM
   Clements M. A., 1991, Lindleyana, V6, P59
   Climo F. M, 1975, BIOGEOGRAPHY ECOLOGY, P459, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-010-1941-5_11, 10.1007/978-94-010-1941-5_11]
   Cockayne L., 1928, The Vegetation of New Zealand
   Comes HP, 1998, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V3, P432, DOI 10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01327-2
   COOPER A, 1995, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V261, P293, DOI 10.1098/rspb.1995.0150
   Cox CB, 1998, J BIOGEOGR, V25, P813, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.00265.x
   CRAW R, 1989, NEW ZEAL J ZOOL, V16, P527, DOI 10.1080/03014223.1989.10422921
   Crisp M D., 1999, Flora of Australia, V1, P321
   Darwin C., 1859, ORIGIN SPECIES MEANS
   Dawson J., 1988, Forest vines to snow tussocks: the story of New Zealand plants
   de Lange PJ, 1999, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V37, P603, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1999.9512657
   de Lange PJ, 1997, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V35, P555, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1987.10410179
   de Lange PJ, 1998, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V36, P521
   deLange PJ, 1997, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V35, P317
   DELANGE PJ, 1995, NZ BOTANICAL SOC NEW, V40, P13
   DELANGE PJ, 1990, NZ BOTANICAL SOC NEW, V22, P9
   DRUCE AP, 1984, UNPUB DISTRIBUTION I
   DUMBLETON L. J., 1967, N Z J BOT, V5, P211
   ENRIGHT NJ, 1995, ECOLOGY SO CONIFERS, P197
   Fleming C.A., 1975, Biogeography and Ecology in New Zealand, V27, P1
   Garnock-Jones P. J., 1993, Australian Systematic Botany, V6, P457, DOI 10.1071/SB9930457
   Garnock-Jones PJ, 1998, AUST SYST BOT, V11, P175, DOI 10.1071/SB97008
   GHANI MA, 1978, NEW ZEAL J GEOL GEOP, V21, P117, DOI 10.1080/00288306.1978.10420728
   Given D.R., 1986, Flora and fauna of alpine Australasia: ages and origins, P451
   Glenny D, 1997, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V35, P441, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1987.10410169
   GRAHAM D K F, 1976, New Zealand Journal of Botany, V14, P275
   GRANTHAM TA, 1995, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V26, P301
   HAASE P, 1992, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V30, P315, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1992.10412910
   HAASE P, 1992, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V30, P359, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1992.10412913
   HAWKINS BJ, 1989, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V27, P101, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1989.10410148
   HAWKINS BJ, 1989, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V27, P83, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1989.10410146
   HEADS M, 1989, NEW ZEAL J ZOOL, V16, P549, DOI 10.1080/03014223.1989.10422922
   Heads M, 1998, BIOL J LINN SOC, V63, P161, DOI 10.1006/bijl.1997.0177
   Heenan PB, 1997, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V35, P437, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1987.10410168
   Heenan PB, 1997, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V35, P395
   Heenan PB, 1998, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V36, P21
   HERTZER RH, 1998, GEOLOGICAL SOC NZ MI, V97, P35
   Hewitt GM, 1996, BIOL J LINN SOC, V58, P247, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01434.x
   Holdaway Richard N., 1999, P189
   Hooker JD., 1853, FLORA NOVAE ZELAND 1
   JANE GT, 1995, NZ BOTANICAL SOC NEW, V42, P4
   Kershaw A.P., 1994, History of the Australian vegetation: Cretaceous to Recent, P299, DOI DOI 10.20851/J.CTT1SQ5WRV.17
   Koechlin J., 1974, FLORE VEGETATION MAD
   KOHN BP, 1992, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V95, P73, DOI 10.1016/0031-0182(92)90166-3
   LLOYD DG, 1985, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V23, P707, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1985.10434239
   LOCKHART PJ, IN PRESS ANN MISSOUR
   Lomolino MV, 1996, J BIOGEOGR, V23, P699, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.1996.tb00030.x
   Lord J, 1999, J BIOGEOGR, V26, P1249, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00355.x
   McGlone M.S., 1988, HDB VEGETATION SCI, P558
   MCGLONE MS, 1981, NEW ZEAL J ECOL, V4, P20
   McGlone MS, 1996, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V5, P309, DOI 10.2307/2997586
   McGlone MS, 1997, NATO ASI SER SER I, V47, P73
   MCGLONE MS, 1985, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V23, P723, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1985.10434240
   MILDENHALL DC, 1980, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V31, P197, DOI 10.1016/0031-0182(80)90019-X
   Mitchell AD, 1998, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V36, P417, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1998.9512580
   Mitchell AD, 2000, SYST BOT, V25, P98, DOI 10.2307/2666676
   Molloy BPJ, 1990, NZ ORCHIDS NATURAL H, P36
   OGDEN J, 1989, J ROY SOC NEW ZEAL, V19, P249
   Oliver WRB., 1948, RECORDS AUCKLAND I M, V3, P211
   Orchard AE, 1999, FLORA AUSTR, V1, P1
   PARRIS BS, 1972, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V18, P145
   POLE M, 1994, J BIOGEOGR, V21, P625, DOI 10.2307/2846036
   Pole Mike, 1993, Australian Systematic Botany, V6, P387, DOI 10.1071/SB9930387
   Powell A. W. B., 1949, Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand, V77, P202
   POWLESLAND MH, 1984, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V22, P81, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1984.10425235
   Procter J, 1984, BIOGEOGRAPHY ECOLOGY, V55, P209
   ROGERS GM, 1989, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V27, P221, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1989.10410376
   ROGERS GM, 1999, NZ BOT SOC NEWSLETTE, V57, P12
   Stagpoole V, 1999, NEW ZEAL J GEOL GEOP, V42, P327, DOI 10.1080/00288306.1999.9514849
   STANLEY SM, 1975, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V72, P646, DOI 10.1073/pnas.72.2.646
   Sutherland R, 1999, NEW ZEAL J GEOL GEOP, V42, P295, DOI 10.1080/00288306.1999.9514846
   Swenson U, 1997, SYST BIOL, V46, P407, DOI 10.2307/2413689
   SYKES WR, 1977, NZ DEP SCI IND RES B, V219
   THORNE RF, 1969, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V255, P595, DOI 10.1098/rstb.1969.0032
   Wagner W.L., 1990, Manual of the flowering plants of Hawai'i, P83
   Wagstaff SJ, 1998, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V36, P425, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1998.9512581
   Wagstaff SJ, 1999, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V37, P17, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1999.9512609
   Wagstaff SJ, 1999, AM J BOT, V86, P1346, DOI 10.2307/2656781
   Wagstaff SJ, 2000, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V38, P389
   Walcott RI, 1998, REV GEOPHYS, V36, P1, DOI 10.1029/97RG03084
   WARDLE P, 1988, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V26, P541, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1988.10410660
   WARDLE P., 1963, NEW ZEALAND JOUR BOT, V1, P3
   Webb CJ, 1999, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V37, P119, DOI 10.1080/0028825X.1999.9512618
   Wellman H.W., 1979, The Origin of the Southern Alps, V18, P13
   Wilton AD, 2000, NEW ZEAL J BOT, V38, P537
   [No title captured]
NR 104
TC 210
Z9 221
U1 1
U2 102
PU BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA P O BOX 88, OSNEY MEAD, OXFORD OX2 0NE, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0305-0270
J9 J BIOGEOGR
JI J. Biogeogr.
PD FEB
PY 2001
VL 28
IS 2
BP 199
EP 216
DI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00525.x
PG 18
WC Ecology; Geography, Physical
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S); Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Physical Geography
GA 447AU
UT WOS:000169547000005
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Chen, YS
   Wu, FJ
   Wang, YY
   Guo, YP
   Kirwan, ML
   Liu, WW
   Zhang, YH
AF Chen, Yasong
   Wu, Fujia
   Wang, Yueyue
   Guo, Yangping
   Kirwan, Matthew L.
   Liu, Wenwen
   Zhang, Yihui
TI Latitudinal trends in the biomass allocation of invasive <i>Spartina
   alterniflora</i>: implications for salt marsh adaptation to climate
   warming
SO FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE invasive plants; latitude; biomass allocation; trade-off; saltmarsh;
   global warming
ID COASTAL MARSHES; PLANT BIOMASS; TEMPERATURE; GROWTH; REPRODUCTION;
   INUNDATION; PRODUCTIVITY; GRASSLAND; SALINITY; HABITATS
AB Introduction: Biomass allocation between aboveground and belowground pools in salt marshes has distinct effects on salt marsh stability, and is influenced by climate warming and reproductive investment. However, the lack of studies on the effect of latitudinal variations in reproductive investments and biomass allocation in salt marshes makes it difficult to explore mechanisms of marsh plant growth to climate warming across geographical scales. The rapid invasion of the salt marsh grass Spartina alterniflora into lower latitude marshes around the world provides an opportunity to investigate biomass allocation and reproductive investment across latitudes, helping to understand how salt marshes respond to climate warming.
   Methods: Therefore, we investigated aboveground biomass (AGB), belowground biomass (BGB), total biomass, sexual reproduction traits (inflorescence biomass, flowering culm), asexual reproduction traits (shoot number, rhizome biomass), among S. alterniflora at 19 sites in 10 geographic locations over a latitudinal gradient of similar to 2000 km from Dongying (37.82 degrees N, high latitude) to Danzhou (19.73 degrees N, low latitude) in China.
   Results: The AGB, BGB, and total biomass displayed hump shaped relationships with latitude, but the BGB: AGB ratio decreased with increasing latitude (i.e. increased linearly with temperature). Interestingly, we found that the BGB: AGB ratio negatively correlated with sexual reproductive investment, but positively correlated with asexual reproductive investment.
   Discussion: While conceptual and numerical models of salt marsh stability and carbon accumulation often infer responses based on aboveground biomass, our study suggests that salt marsh responses to climate warming based on aboveground biomass and static allocations may bias estimates of future salt marsh production driven by climate warming.
C1 [Chen, Yasong; Wu, Fujia; Wang, Yueyue; Guo, Yangping; Liu, Wenwen; Zhang, Yihui] Xiamen Univ, Coll Environm & Ecol, Key Lab, Minist Educ Coastal & Wetland Ecosyst, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples R China.
   [Kirwan, Matthew L.] Virginia Inst Marine Sci, William & Mary, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 USA.
RP Liu, WW; Zhang, YH (corresponding author), Xiamen Univ, Coll Environm & Ecol, Key Lab, Minist Educ Coastal & Wetland Ecosyst, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples R China.
EM lww@xmu.edu.cn; zyh@xmu.edu.cn
FU National Key Research and Development Program of
   China10.13039/501100012166
FX We thank H. Lu, D. Peng, X. Chen, J. Wang provided feedback throughout
   this investigated. We thank H. Zhou, W. Wu, X. Chen, Q. Wang conducted
   field measurements and sample collections.
CR An SQ, 2007, WEED RES, V47, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2007.00559.x
   Biçe K, 2023, FRONT MAR SCI, V10, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2023.1130958
   Borges FO, 2021, FRONT MAR SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2021.696333
   Bruns NE, 2024, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V51, DOI 10.1029/2024GL110902
   Chen X, 2019, NORD J BOT, V37, DOI 10.1111/njb.02411
   Chen XC, 2021, ECOLOGY, V102, DOI 10.1002/ecy.3311
   CODY ML, 1991, VEGETATIO, V97, P39
   Coldren GA, 2019, J ECOL, V107, P79, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13049
   Coleman DJ, 2019, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V44, P944, DOI 10.1002/esp.4547
   Crosby S. C., 2015, Spartina alterniflora. Am. J. Bot, V102, P669, DOI [10.3732/ajb.1400534, DOI 10.3732/AJB.1400534]
   Crosby SC, 2017, ESTUAR COAST, V40, P213, DOI 10.1007/s12237-016-0142-9
   Darby FA, 2008, ESTUAR COAST, V31, P223, DOI 10.1007/s12237-007-9014-7
   Dixon P, 2003, J VEG SCI, V14, P927, DOI 10.1658/1100-9233(2003)014[0927:VAPORF]2.0.CO;2
   Gao JH, 2016, ECOL ENG, V95, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.088
   Gedan KB, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V106, P7, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-0003-7
   George R, 2018, ECOL EVOL, V8, P4508, DOI 10.1002/ece3.3952
   Gross M. F., 1991, Spartina alterniflora (Smooth Cordgrass). Estuaries, V14, P180, DOI [10.2307/1351692, DOI 10.2307/1351692]
   Hatfield JL, 2015, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V10, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001
   Jiang YC, 2024, FRONT MAR SCI, V11, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2024.1400381
   Jin YQ, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V804, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150169
   Kaldy JE, 2000, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V193, P271, DOI 10.3354/meps193271
   Kirwan ML, 2013, NATURE, V504, P53, DOI 10.1038/nature12856
   Kirwan ML, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P1982, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01834.x
   Lefcheck JS, 2016, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V7, P573, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12512
   Li L, 2019, AM J BOT, V106, P42, DOI 10.1002/ajb2.1218
   Li RX, 2018, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V213, P305, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2018.08.027
   Liu MY, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10121933
   Liu WW, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V138, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108799
   Liu WW, 2022, ECOL EVOL, V12, DOI 10.1002/ece3.8681
   Liu WW, 2020, NEW PHYTOL, V226, P623, DOI 10.1111/nph.16371
   Liu WW, 2020, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V65, P1399, DOI 10.1002/lno.11395
   Liu WW, 2019, FUNCT ECOL, V33, P1830, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13384
   Liu WW, 2016, J ECOL, V104, P173, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12487
   Liu YJ, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2021.650802
   Lowry DB, 2019, EVOLUTION, V73, P1168, DOI 10.1111/evo.13699
   Ma HZ, 2021, NAT ECOL EVOL, V5, P1110, DOI 10.1038/s41559-021-01485-1
   Ma ZJ, 2003, ECOL RES, V18, P321, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2003.00557.x
   McCarthy MC, 2007, FUNCT ECOL, V21, P713, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01276.x
   Mudd SM, 2010, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V115, DOI 10.1029/2009JF001566
   Noyce GL, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P21623, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1904990116
   Pennings SC, 1998, ECOGRAPHY, V21, P630, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00556.x
   Poorter H, 2012, NEW PHYTOL, V193, P30, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x
   Qi YL, 2019, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V18, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00606
   Qiu SY, 2018, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V285, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2018.1072
   Silliman BR, 2019, CURR BIOL, V29, P1800, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2019.05.017
   Singh BN, 1935, PLANT PHYSIOL, V10, P245, DOI 10.1104/pp.10.2.245
   Skarpaas O, 2016, PERSPECT PLANT ECOL, V19, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ppees.2016.01.006
   Smith AJ, 2022, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V28, P3236, DOI 10.1111/gcb.16149
   Snedden GA, 2015, ECOL ENG, V81, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.035
   Strong DR, 2013, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V44, P389, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135803
   Sun SC, 2001, ECOL RES, V16, P263, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00395.x
   Tang L, 2022, ECOSPHERE, V13, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.3900
   Tedla B, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V451, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117565
   Thompson FL, 2004, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V17, P581, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00701.x
   Vogel JG, 2008, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V14, P1503, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01600.x
   Wang P, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/055003
   Wang ZW, 2018, BMC PLANT BIOL, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12870-018-1313-6
   Wenk EH, 2015, ECOL EVOL, V5, P5521, DOI 10.1002/ece3.1802
   Wernberg T, 2024, ANNU REV MAR SCI, V16, P247, DOI 10.1146/annurev-marine-042023-093037
   Xie XF, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00603
   Xu X, 2020, ECOL APPL, V30, DOI 10.1002/eap.2045
   Xue L, 2018, J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL, V506, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.jembe.2018.06.008
   Yang Y, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V636, P621, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.260
   Yue SD, 2020, FRONT MAR SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2020.574790
   Zhang DH, 2017, WETLANDS, V37, P1181, DOI 10.1007/s13157-017-0950-0
   Zhang YH, 2012, ECOLOGY, V93, P588, DOI 10.1890/11-1302.1
   Zhao YJ, 2010, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V637, P143, DOI 10.1007/s10750-009-9992-5
   Zhou LY, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V774, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145317
NR 68
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 2
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-7745
J9 FRONT MAR SCI
JI Front. Mar. Sci.
PD DEC 11
PY 2024
VL 11
AR 1510854
DI 10.3389/fmars.2024.1510854
PG 11
WC Environmental Sciences; Marine & Freshwater Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Marine & Freshwater Biology
GA Q2K1C
UT WOS:001383026200001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Macit, MN
   Collin, E
   Pfenninger, M
   Foitzik, S
   Feldmeyer, B
AF Macit, Maide Nesibe
   Collin, Erwann
   Pfenninger, Markus
   Foitzik, Susanne
   Feldmeyer, Barbara
TI Genomic basis of adaptation to climate and parasite prevalence and the
   importance of odorant perception in the ant <i>Temnothorax
   longispinosus</i>
SO MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE cuticular hydrocarbons; dulosis; local adaptation; odorant perception;
   PoolSeq; social parasitism
ID CUTICULAR HYDROCARBON COMPOSITION; CONTACT SEX-PHEROMONE; SOCIAL
   PARASITE; NATURAL VARIATION; SLAVEMAKING ANT; ARMS-RACE; DROSOPHILA;
   RECOGNITION; ECOLOGY; PERMEABILITY
AB A co-evolutionary arms race ensues when parasites exhibit exploitative behaviour, which prompts adaptations in their hosts, in turn triggering counter-adaptations by the parasites. To unravel the genomic basis of this coevolution from the host's perspective, we collected ants of the host species Temnothorax longispinosus, parasitized by the social parasite Temnothorax americanus, from 10 populations in the northeastern United States exhibiting varying levels of parasite prevalence and living under different climatic conditions. We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with both prevalence and climate. Our investigation highlighted a multitude of candidate SNPs associated with parasite prevalence, particularly in genes responsible for sensory perception of smell including odorant receptor genes. We further focused on population-specific compositions of cuticular hydrocarbons, a complex trait important for signalling, communication and protection against desiccation. The relative abundances of n-alkanes were correlated with climate, while there was only a trend between parasite prevalence and the relative abundances of known recognition cues. Furthermore, we identified candidate genes likely involved in the synthesis and recognition of specific hydrocarbons. In addition, we analysed the population-level gene expression in the antennae, the primary organ for odorant reception, and established a strong correlation with parasite prevalence. Our comprehensive study highlights the intricate genomic patterns forged by the interplay of diverse selection factors and how these are manifested in the expression of various phenotypes.
C1 [Macit, Maide Nesibe; Pfenninger, Markus; Feldmeyer, Barbara] Senckenberg Biodivers & Climate Res Ctr SBiK F, Frankfurt, Germany.
   [Collin, Erwann; Foitzik, Susanne] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Organism & Mol Evolut, Mainz, Germany.
C3 Senckenberg Biodiversitat & Klima- Forschungszentrum (BiK-F); Leibniz
   Association; Senckenberg Gesellschaft fur Naturforschung (SGN); Johannes
   Gutenberg University of Mainz
RP Macit, MN (corresponding author), Senckenberg Biodivers & Climate Res Ctr SBiK F, Frankfurt, Germany.
EM maide-nesibe.macit@senckenberg.de
RI Feldmeyer, Barbara/E-5067-2015; Foitzik, Susanne/A-6504-2019
OI Foitzik, Susanne/0000-0001-8161-6306; Pfenninger,
   Markus/0000-0002-1547-7245; Macit, Maide Nesibe/0000-0001-9415-2774
FU Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FE 1333/3-3, Fo298/17-3, GRK 2526/1];
   Huyck Preserve
FX Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Grant/Award Number: FE 1333/3-3,
   Fo298/17-3 and GRK 2526/1; Huyck Preserve
CR Achenbach A, 2010, BEHAV ECOL, V21, P948, DOI 10.1093/beheco/arq008
   Alexa A., 2016, R Package Version 1.38.1
   Alleman A, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-20262-y
   ALLIES AB, 1986, J CHEM ECOL, V12, P1285, DOI 10.1007/BF01012348
   ALTSCHUL SF, 1990, J MOL BIOL, V215, P403, DOI 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999
   Andersen MK, 2017, J EXP BIOL, V220, P4261, DOI 10.1242/jeb.168518
   Andrews S., 2010, FASTQC QUALITY CONTR
   Awater-Salendo S, 2020, J CHEM ECOL, V46, P1032, DOI 10.1007/s10886-020-01227-w
   Bateman A, 2023, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V51, pD523, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkac1052
   Bauer S, 2009, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V64, P45, DOI 10.1007/s00265-009-0817-3
   Berson JD, 2019, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V286, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2019.0677
   BHATKAR A, 1970, Florida Entomologist, V53, P229, DOI 10.2307/3493193
   Blomquist GJ, 2010, INSECT HYDROCARBONS: BIOLOGY, BIOCHEMISTRY, AND CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511711909
   Bolger AM, 2014, BIOINFORMATICS, V30, P2114, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
   Boomsma JJ, 2017, MYRMECOL NEWS, V25, P61
   Brandt M, 2005, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V18, P576, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00867.x
   Brandt M, 2004, ECOLOGY, V85, P2997, DOI 10.1890/03-0778
   Runquist RDB, 2020, AM NAT, V195, P412, DOI 10.1086/707322
   Broad Institute, 2018, Picard Toolkit
   Caminer M. A., 2023, BIORXIV, DOI [10.1101/2023.01.20.524877, DOI 10.1101/2023.01.20.524877]
   Carlson DA, 1998, J CHEM ECOL, V24, P1845, DOI 10.1023/A:1022311701355
   Chung H, 2014, SCIENCE, V343, P1148, DOI 10.1126/science.1249998
   Clarke A, 2004, FUNCT ECOL, V18, P243, DOI 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00841.x
   Cordonnier M, 2022, BMC ECOL EVOL, V22, DOI 10.1186/s12862-022-02044-3
   D'Ettorre P, 2005, CURR BIOL, V15, P2170, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.067
   Dani FR, 2001, ANIM BEHAV, V62, P165, DOI 10.1006/anbe.2001.1714
   DAWKINS R, 1979, PROC R SOC SER B-BIO, V205, P489, DOI 10.1098/rspb.1979.0081
   Edney E. B., 2019, WATER BALANCE LAND A
   Errbii M, 2021, MOL ECOL, V30, P6211, DOI 10.1111/mec.16099
   Feder AF, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048588
   Feldmeyer B, 2017, BMC EVOL BIOL, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12862-017-1078-9
   Feldmeyer B, 2016, MOL ECOL, V25, P648, DOI 10.1111/mec.13498
   Feng M, 2022, FRONT IMMUNOL, V13, DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2022.852702
   Foitzik S, 2001, EVOLUTION, V55, P307, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01295.x
   Foitzik S, 2009, ECOLOGY, V90, P1195, DOI 10.1890/08-0520.1
   Garland T, 2022, PHYSIOL BIOCHEM ZOOL, V95, P82, DOI 10.1086/717897
   Gautier M, 2015, GENETICS, V201, P1555, DOI 10.1534/genetics.115.181453
   GIBBS A, 1995, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS B, V112, P243, DOI 10.1016/0305-0491(95)00081-X
   Gibbs AG, 1998, AM ZOOL, V38, P471
   Gibbs AG, 2002, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V48, P391, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1910(02)00059-8
   Ginzel MD, 2003, J CHEM ECOL, V29, P533, DOI 10.1023/A:1022894419521
   Gregory T. Ryan, 2009, Evolution Education and Outreach, V2, P156
   Guédot C, 2009, J CHEM ECOL, V35, P1437, DOI 10.1007/s10886-009-9725-2
   Hamilton W.D., 1982, Life Sciences Research Report, P269
   Hartke J, 2021, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V34, P937, DOI 10.1111/jeb.13742
   Herbers JM, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P148, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0148:TEOSAA]2.0.CO;2
   Hermann H.R., 1984, Defensive mechanisms in social insects
   Holldobler B., 1990, pi
   Holze H, 2021, HEREDITY, V126, P219, DOI 10.1038/s41437-020-00380-y
   Honorio R, 2019, ANIM BEHAV, V157, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.09.007
   Howard JT, 2014, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V58, P1665, DOI 10.1007/s00484-013-0773-5
   Igoshin AV, 2019, BMC GENET, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12863-019-0725-0
   JALLON JM, 1984, BEHAV GENET, V14, P441, DOI 10.1007/BF01065444
   Johansson H, 2018, PEERJ, V6, DOI 10.7717/peerj.5024
   Jongepier E, 2015, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V28, P2152, DOI 10.1111/jeb.12738
   Jongepier E, 2016, BEHAV ECOL, V27, P304, DOI 10.1093/beheco/arv153
   Jongepier E, 2014, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V281, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2014.0225
   Jonusaite S, 2020, AM J PHYSIOL-CELL PH, V318, pC675, DOI 10.1152/ajpcell.00492.2019
   Kaur R, 2019, PHILOS T R SOC B, V374, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2018.0192
   Kim D, 2015, NAT METHODS, V12, P357, DOI [10.1038/NMETH.3317, 10.1038/nmeth.3317]
   Kleeberg I, 2017, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V284, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2016.2249
   Kofler R, 2011, BIOINFORMATICS, V27, P3435, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr589
   Kofler R, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0015925
   Kohlmeier P, 2019, MOL ECOL, V28, P658, DOI 10.1111/mec.14971
   Kohlmeier P, 2018, PLOS BIOL, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005747
   Kohlmeier P, 2017, SCI NAT-HEIDELBERG, V104, DOI 10.1007/s00114-017-1452-x
   Krasnec MO, 2013, J CHEM ECOL, V39, P59, DOI 10.1007/s10886-012-0227-2
   Lacey ES, 2008, PHYSIOL ENTOMOL, V33, P209, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2008.00624.x
   Le S, 2008, J STAT SOFTW, V25, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v025.i01
   Lenoir A, 2001, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V46, P573, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.573
   Leonhardt SD, 2016, CELL, V164, P1277, DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.035
   Li H, 2009, BIOINFORMATICS, V25, P2078, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
   Li H, 2009, BIOINFORMATICS, V25, P1094, DOI [10.1093/bioinformatics/btp100, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324]
   Lin JT, 2019, APMIS, V127, P170, DOI 10.1111/apm.12939
   Liu Y, 2022, INSECTS, V13, DOI 10.3390/insects13100862
   Lorenzi MC, 2011, ANIM BEHAV, V82, P1143, DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.08.011
   LOVE MI, 2014, GENOME BIOL, V15, DOI DOI 10.1186/S13059-014-0550-8
   Mackay WP, 2000, SOCIOBIOLOGY, V36, P265
   Martin SJ, 2008, J CHEM ECOL, V34, P1072, DOI 10.1007/s10886-008-9482-7
   Martin SJ, 2009, J CHEM ECOL, V35, P368, DOI 10.1007/s10886-009-9612-x
   Menzel F, 2018, FUNCT ECOL, V32, P657, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13008
   Monnin T, 1999, BEHAV ECOL, V10, P323, DOI 10.1093/beheco/10.3.323
   Morgan ET, 2020, DRUG METAB REV, V52, P455, DOI 10.1080/03602532.2020.1817061
   Moustafa GG, 2008, JPN J VET RES, V56, P109
   NADIN L, 1995, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V109, P198, DOI 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90285-6
   Nandi A, 2019, OXID MED CELL LONGEV, V2019, DOI 10.1155/2019/9613090
   Oksanen J, 2022, Vegan
   Oppold AM, 2016, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V283, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2015.2413
   Pamminger T, 2011, BEHAV ECOL, V22, P255, DOI 10.1093/beheco/arq191
   Paysan-Lafosse T, 2023, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V51, pD418, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkac993
   Pei XJ, 2019, INSECT BIOCHEM MOLEC, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.ibmb.2019.103203
   Pennings PS, 2011, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V24, P871, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02223.x
   Putri GH, 2022, BIOINFORMATICS, V38, P2943, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac166
   Quinlan AR, 2010, BIOINFORMATICS, V26, P841, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033
   R Core Team, 2023, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
   Robinson JT, 2011, NAT BIOTECHNOL, V29, P24, DOI 10.1038/nbt.1754
   Rollmann SM, 2010, GENETICS, V186, P687, DOI 10.1534/genetics.110.119446
   Ruther J, 2011, ENTOMOL EXP APPL, V140, P59, DOI 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2011.01129.x
   Sakata I, 2017, J CHEM ECOL, V43, P966, DOI 10.1007/s10886-017-0891-3
   Samanta TB, 2003, BIOCHEM BIOPH RES CO, V312, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.09.227
   Scharf I, 2011, ETHOLOGY, V117, P731, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01926.x
   Schnnenbeck P., 2021, TBG NEW FILE FORMAT
   Segev U, 2019, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V73, DOI 10.1007/s00265-019-2690-z
   Silk PJ, 2011, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V40, P714, DOI 10.1603/EN10213
   Sprenger PP, 2020, MYRMECOL NEWS, V30, P1, DOI 10.25849/myrmecol.news_030:001
   Sprenger PP, 2019, J CHEM ECOL, V45, P741, DOI 10.1007/s10886-019-01099-9
   Stoldt M, 2023, MOL ECOL, V32, P5170, DOI 10.1111/mec.17092
   Tellier A, 2014, EVOLUTION, V68, P2211, DOI 10.1111/evo.12427
   U.S. Forest Service, 2021, US FOREST SERVICE IN
   van Zweden JS, 2010, INSECT HYDROCARBONS: BIOLOGY, BIOCHEMISTRY, AND CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, P222, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511711909.012
   VENARD R, 1980, EXPERIENTIA, V36, P211, DOI 10.1007/BF01953737
   Wagner D, 2001, J CHEM ECOL, V27, P1805, DOI 10.1023/A:1010408725464
   Wagner D, 1998, J CHEM ECOL, V24, P2021, DOI 10.1023/A:1020781508889
   Wang P, 2010, GENETICS, V184, P759, DOI 10.1534/genetics.109.113340
   Wesson L. G. jr., 1939, Transactions of the American Entomological Society, V65, P97
   Wicker-Thomas C, 2015, J LIPID RES, V56, P2094, DOI 10.1194/jlr.M060368
   Wisz MS, 2013, BIOL REV, V88, P15, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00235.x
   Yang YJ, 2022, J ECON ENTOMOL, V115, P508, DOI 10.1093/jee/toab240
   Zhang JJ, 2014, BIOINFORMATICS, V30, P614, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt593
NR 119
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 9
U2 12
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0962-1083
EI 1365-294X
J9 MOL ECOL
JI Mol. Ecol.
PD JUL
PY 2024
VL 33
IS 13
DI 10.1111/mec.17417
EA MAY 2024
PG 16
WC Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Ecology; Evolutionary Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Environmental Sciences & Ecology;
   Evolutionary Biology
GA WG6C9
UT WOS:001234390900001
PM 38808556
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Lombardi, E
   Shestakova, TA
   Santini, F
   de Dios, VR
   Voltas, J
AF Lombardi, Erica
   Shestakova, Tatiana A.
   Santini, Filippo
   de Dios, Victor Resco
   Voltas, Jordi
TI Harnessing tree-ring phenotypes to disentangle gene by environment
   interactions and their climate dependencies in a circum-Mediterranean
   pine
SO ANNALS OF BOTANY
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptive variation; common garden; dendroecology; factorial regression;
   Pinus halepensis; phenotypic plasticity; single nucleotide polymorphisms
ID FACTORIAL REGRESSION; ECOTYPIC VARIATION; GROWTH; HALEPENSIS; MODELS;
   QTL; POPULATIONS; ALLOCATION; GENOTYPES; EARLYWOOD
AB Background and Aims Understanding the genetic basis of adaptation and plasticity in trees constitutes a knowledge gap. We linked dendrochronology and genomics [single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)] for a widespread conifer (Pinus halepensis Mill.) to characterize intraspecific growth differences elicited by climate. Methods The analysis comprised 20-year tree-ring series of 130 trees structured in 23 populations evaluated in a common garden. We tested for genotype by environment interactions (G x E) of indexed ring width (RWI) and early- to latewood ratios (ELI) using factorial regression, which describes G x E as differential gene sensitivity to climate. Key Results The species' annual growth was positively influenced by winter temperature and spring moisture and negatively influenced by previous autumn precipitation and warm springs. Four and five climate factors explained 10 % (RWI) and 16 % (ELI) of population-specific interannual variability, respectively, with populations from drought-prone areas and with uneven precipitation experiencing larger growth reductions during dry vegetative periods. Furthermore, four and two SNPs explained 14 % (RWI) and 10 % (ELI) of interannual variability among trees, respectively. Two SNPs played a putative role in adaptation to climate: one identified from transcriptome sequencing of P. halepensis and another involved in response regulation to environmental stressors. Conclusions We highlight how tree-ring phenotypes, obtained from a common garden experiment, combined with a candidate-gene approach allow the quantification of genetic and environmental effects determining adaptation for a conifer with a large and complex genome.
C1 [Lombardi, Erica; Santini, Filippo; de Dios, Victor Resco; Voltas, Jordi] Joint Res Unit CTFC AGROTECNIO CERCA, Av Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, E-25198 Lleida, Spain.
   [Lombardi, Erica; Santini, Filippo; de Dios, Victor Resco; Voltas, Jordi] Univ Lleida, Dept Crop & Forest Sci, Av Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, E-25198 Lleida, Spain.
   [Shestakova, Tatiana A.] Woodwell Climate Res Ctr, 149 Woods Hole Rd, Falmouth, MA 02540 USA.
C3 Universitat de Lleida
RP Lombardi, E (corresponding author), Joint Res Unit CTFC AGROTECNIO CERCA, Av Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, E-25198 Lleida, Spain.; Lombardi, E (corresponding author), Univ Lleida, Dept Crop & Forest Sci, Av Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, E-25198 Lleida, Spain.
EM erica.lombardi@udl.cat
RI Voltas, Jordi/N-9587-2019; de Dios, Víctor/AAH-3655-2019; Shestakova,
   Tatiana/S-4198-2016
OI Resco de Dios, Victor/0000-0002-5721-1656; Shestakova,
   Tatiana/0000-0002-5605-0299
FU Spanish Government-Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades
   [AGL2015-68274-C3-3-R, RTI2018-094691-B-C31]; AGAUR FI-2020 pre-doctoral
   fellowship (Secretariat for Universities and Research of the Ministry of
   Business and Knowledge of the Government of Catalonia); AGAUR FI-2020
   pre-doctoral fellowship (European Social Fund)
FX This work was partly supported by the Spanish Government-Ministerio de
   Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades; grant numbers AGL2015-68274-C3-3-R
   (MINECO/FEDER) and RTI2018-094691-B-C31 (MCIU/AEI/FEDER, EU). E.
   Lombardi was supported by a AGAUR FI-2020 pre-doctoral fellowship (with
   support from the Secretariat for Universities and Research of the
   Ministry of Business and Knowledge of the Government of Catalonia and
   the European Social Fund).
CR Asano T, 2012, PLANT SIGNAL BEHAV, V7, P817, DOI 10.4161/psb.20351
   Garzón MB, 2011, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V20, P766, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00646.x
   Bouachir BB, 2017, DENDROCHRONOLOGIA, V45, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.dendro.2017.06.008
   Boudsocq M, 2013, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V18, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.08.008
   Boutet E, 2016, METHODS MOL BIOL, V1374, P23, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3167-5_2
   Bunn AG, 2008, DENDROCHRONOLOGIA, V26, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.dendro.2008.01.002
   Cabral-Alemán C, 2017, FORESTS, V8, DOI 10.3390/f8050173
   Calleja-Rodriguez A, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2021.666820
   Camarero JJ, 2021, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V35, P155, DOI 10.1007/s00468-020-02028-0
   Capblancq T, 2021, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V12, P2298, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.13722
   Choury Z, 2017, EUR J FOREST RES, V136, P139, DOI 10.1007/s10342-016-1014-3
   Climent J, 2008, AM J BOT, V95, P833, DOI 10.3732/ajb.2007354
   Daniels RR, 2019, GENES-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/genes10090673
   de Luis M, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0083550
   de Luis M, 2011, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V262, P1630, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.07.013
   de Miguel M, 2022, MOL ECOL, V31, P2089, DOI 10.1111/mec.16367
   Depardieu C, 2021, MOL ECOL, V30, P3898, DOI 10.1111/mec.15846
   Depardieu C, 2020, NEW PHYTOL, V227, P427, DOI 10.1111/nph.16551
   Domec JC, 2002, J EXP BOT, V53, P2369, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erf100
   Du QZ, 2015, DNA RES, V22, P53, DOI 10.1093/dnares/dsu040
   Fick SE, 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P4302, DOI 10.1002/joc.5086
   Fitzpatrick MC, 2015, ECOL LETT, V18, P1, DOI 10.1111/ele.12376
   Forner A, 2018, TREE PHYSIOL, V38, P1127, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpy022
   Gallego-Giraldo L, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P3281, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1914422117
   Gazol A, 2017, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V232, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.08.014
   George JP, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V660, P631, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.478
   Griffin D, 2011, TREE-RING RES, V67, P87, DOI 10.3959/2011-4.1
   Grivet D, 2011, MOL BIOL EVOL, V28, P101, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msq190
   Harris I, 2020, SCI DATA, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3
   Helluy M, 2020, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V460, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117877
   Hevia A, 2020, ANN FOREST SCI, V77, DOI 10.1007/s13595-020-00956-y
   Holliday JA, 2012, G3-GENES GENOM GENET, V2, P1085, DOI 10.1534/g3.112.002733
   HOLMES R L, 1983, Tree-Ring Bulletin, V43, P69
   Housset JM, 2016, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V4, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2016.00123
   Housset JM, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V218, P630, DOI 10.1111/nph.14968
   Jaramillo-Correa JP, 2015, GENETICS, V199, P793, DOI 10.1534/genetics.114.173252
   Jarquín D, 2014, THEOR APPL GENET, V127, P595, DOI 10.1007/s00122-013-2243-1
   Jezkova T, 2016, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V283, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2016.2104
   Camarero JJ, 2010, NEW PHYTOL, V185, P471, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03073.x
   Kagawa A, 2006, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V29, P1571, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01533.x
   Kaur Navneet, 2013, Subcell Biochem, V69, P195, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6889-5_11
   Klein T, 2013, TREE PHYSIOL, V33, P26, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tps116
   Littell RC, 1998, J ANIM SCI, V76, P1216
   Lombardi E, 2021, PLANT SOIL, V468, P319, DOI 10.1007/s11104-021-05135-0
   Mahony CR, 2020, EVOL APPL, V13, P116, DOI 10.1111/eva.12871
   Malosetti M, 2004, EUPHYTICA, V137, P139, DOI 10.1023/B:EUPH.0000040511.46388.ef
   Malosetti M, 2013, FRONT PHYSIOL, V4, DOI 10.3389/fphys.2013.00044
   Martín-Benito D, 2010, ANN FOREST SCI, V67, DOI 10.1051/forest/2009121
   Martín-Sanz RC, 2019, FRONT PLANT SCI, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2019.00607
   Martínez-Sancho E, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V779, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146393
   Montwé D, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P806, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13123
   NELDER JA, 1994, STAT COMPUT, V4, P221, DOI 10.1007/BF00156745
   Novak K, 2013, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V27, P927, DOI 10.1007/s00468-013-0845-5
   Papadopoulos A., 2001, Ecologia Mediterranea, V27, P89
   Pasho E, 2012, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V26, P1875, DOI 10.1007/s00468-012-0756-x
   Patsiou TS, 2020, NEW PHYTOL, V228, P525, DOI 10.1111/nph.16656
   Pinosio S, 2014, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V14, P846, DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12232
   Puri E, 2015, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V29, P1187, DOI 10.1007/s00468-015-1199-y
   Royer-Tardif S, 2021, ECOL EVOL, V11, P13081, DOI 10.1002/ece3.8024
   Royo-Navascues M, 2021, FORESTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/f12070818
   Rui Y, 2017, PLANT CELL, V29, P2413, DOI 10.1105/tpc.17.00568
   Santini F, 2021, NEW PHYTOL, V229, P245, DOI 10.1111/nph.16862
   Santini F, 2019, ANN BOT-LONDON, V124, P1161, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcz088
   Santos-del-Blanco L, 2013, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V26, P1912, DOI 10.1111/jeb.12187
   Sbay H, 2018, ANN FOREST SCI, V75, DOI 10.1007/s13595-018-0746-2
   Schulz P, 2013, PLANT PHYSIOL, V163, P523, DOI 10.1104/pp.113.222539
   Shestakova TA, 2017, FUNCT ECOL, V31, P1359, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12857
   Sixto H, 2016, GCB BIOENERGY, V8, P1124, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12313
   Sork VL, 2013, TREE GENET GENOMES, V9, P901, DOI 10.1007/s11295-013-0596-x
   Tapias R, 2004, PLANT ECOL, V171, P53, DOI 10.1023/B:VEGE.0000029383.72609.f0
   Torbenson MCA, 2016, TREE-RING RES, V72, P53, DOI 10.3959/1536-1098-72.02.53
   van Eeuwijk F. A., 2002, P245, DOI 10.1079/9780851996011.0245
   van Eeuwijk FA, 2005, AUST J AGR RES, V56, P883, DOI 10.1071/AR05153
   Varas-Myrik A, 2022, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V504, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119856
   Vargas M, 2006, THEOR APPL GENET, V112, P1009, DOI 10.1007/s00122-005-0204-z
   Vicente-Serrano SM, 2010, J CLIMATE, V23, P1696, DOI 10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1
   Voltas J, 2005, EUR J AGRON, V22, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2004.04.005
   Voltas J, 2018, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V424, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.04.058
   Wadgymar SM, 2017, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V8, P738, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12777
   Zang C, 2015, ECOGRAPHY, V38, P431, DOI 10.1111/ecog.01335
NR 80
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 2
U2 15
PU OXFORD UNIV PRESS
PI OXFORD
PA GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND
SN 0305-7364
EI 1095-8290
J9 ANN BOT-LONDON
JI Ann. Bot.
PD SEP 26
PY 2022
VL 130
IS 4
BP 509
EP 523
DI 10.1093/aob/mcac092
EA AUG 2022
PG 15
WC Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences
GA 4V0VT
UT WOS:000841270100001
PM 35797146
OA Green Published, Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Mohammadnia, S
   Asghari, A
   Hassanpanah, D
   Karimizadeh, R
   Shokouhian, AA
AF Mohammadnia, Shiva
   Asghari, Ali
   Hassanpanah, Davoud
   Karimizadeh, Rahmatollah
   Shokouhian, Ali Akbar
TI Determining the Most Stable Potato Genotypes Using AMMI Yield Stability
   Analysis Method
SO JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES-TARIM BILIMLERI DERGISI
LA English
DT Article
DE AMMI Parameters; Potato Genotypes; Stability; Tuber Yield
ID MODEL SELECTION; PARAMETERS
AB Genotype-environment interaction (GEI) is very important for breeders. It is considered a complicated issue in breeding programs to obtain stable and high-yielding genotypes to release new genotypes. This study was conducted to achieve a stable high-yielding genotype that is adaptive to climatic conditions of potato-producing regions in Iran. A total of 20 potato breeding lines along with five commercial varieties (Savalan, Agria, Caesar, Luta and Satina) were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with three replicates in the Agricultural Research and Natural Resources Stations of five location (Ardabil, Razavi Khorasan, Karaj, Isfahan and Hamadan) in Iran, for two years (2016 and 2017). Combined ANOVA of yield data for studied genotypes and environments indicates significant differences among potato genotypes, environments, and GE interaction was significant. Thus, the AMMI method and its parameters were used to analyze yield stability. The results indicated that only four interaction principal components were significant (P<0.01), which accounted for 81.2% of the GEI sum of squares. Based on type 1 parameters (SIPC1, FA(1), Za(1), Dz(1), EV1, and Da(1)), genotypes G7, G10, G14, G20 and G24 were identified as to be stable. Moreover, according to the results of type 2, 3 and 4 parameters, genotypes G2, G6, G7, G14, G15 and G20, as well as cultivars Agria (G24) and Luta (G23), were found to be stable. Genotypes G6, G7, G14, G15, G20, and G24 were stable according to the ASV parameter, and genotypes G6 and G7 were stable based on the MASV parameter. Amongst the stable genotypes identified by the AMMI parameters, while genotype G6 was highyielding, G14 and G24 (Agria) were moderate-yielding.
C1 [Mohammadnia, Shiva; Asghari, Ali] Univ Mohaghegh Ardabili, Fac Agr & Nat Resources, Dept Agron & Plant Breeding, Ardebil, Iran.
   [Hassanpanah, Davoud] Ardabil Agr & Nat Resources Res Ctr AREEO, Hort Crops Res Dept, Ardebil, Iran.
   [Karimizadeh, Rahmatollah] Agr Res Educ & Extens Org, Dryland Agr Res Inst, Gachsaran, Iran.
   [Shokouhian, Ali Akbar] Univ Mohaghegh Ardabili, Fac Agr & Nat Resources, Dept Hort, Ardebil, Iran.
C3 University of Mohaghegh Ardabili; University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
RP Asghari, A (corresponding author), Univ Mohaghegh Ardabili, Fac Agr & Nat Resources, Dept Agron & Plant Breeding, Ardebil, Iran.
EM ali_asgharii@yahoo.com
RI Shokouhian, Ali Akbar/AAA-8587-2022; Karimizadeh,
   Rahmatollah/S-3054-2016
CR Abdi H R., 2013, RES ACHIEVEMENTS FIE, V2, P67
   Alemu W., 2018, ADV CROP SCI TECHNOL, V6, P336, DOI [10.4172/2329-8863.1000336, DOI 10.4172/2329-8863.1000336]
   Annicchiarico P, 1997, EUPHYTICA, V94, P53, DOI 10.1023/A:1002954824178
   [Anonymous], 2013, J CROP BREEDING
   [Anonymous], 2016, Iraqi J. Agric. Sci.
   Byarugaba A. A., 2018, African Journal of Agricultural Research, V13, P890, DOI 10.5897/ajar2018.13061
   CROSSA J, 1991, THEOR APPL GENET, V81, P27, DOI 10.1007/BF00226108
   Devaux A, 2014, POTATO RES, V57, P185, DOI 10.1007/s11540-014-9265-1
   Esmaeil Zadeh Moghadam M., 2018, J CROP BREEDING, V10, P73, DOI [10.29252/jcb.10.25.73, DOI 10.29252/JCB.10.25.73]
   Fufa M., 2013, ADV CROP SCI TECHNOL, V2, P1, DOI [10.4172/2329-8863.1000120, DOI 10.4172/2329-8863.1000120]
   GAUCH HG, 1988, BIOMETRICS, V44, P705, DOI 10.2307/2531585
   GAUCH HG, 1988, THEOR APPL GENET, V76, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00288824
   Hymowitz Theodore., 2005, Crop Science, V45, P473
   Karimizadeh R, 2019, J AGR SCI-TARIM BILI, V25, P38, DOI 10.15832/ankutbd.538993
   Karimizadeh R, 2016, TURK J FIELD CROPS, V21, P174, DOI 10.17557/tjfc.17390
   Karimizadeh R, 2012, NOT BOT HORTI AGROBO, V40, P293
   Khashmi, 2018, SEED PLANT IMPROVMEN, V3, P455
   LIN CS, 1986, CROP SCI, V26, P894, DOI 10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600050012x
   Mohammadi A., 2016, J CROP BREEDING, V9, P117
   Mohammadi R, 2016, J CROP ECOPHYSIOLOGY, V10, P731
   Mohebodini M, 2006, EUPHYTICA, V149, P343, DOI 10.1007/s10681-006-9086-7
   Purchase J.L., 1997, Parametric analysis to describe genotype x environment interaction and yield stability in winter wheat
   Raju B.M. K., 2002, Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, V55, P297
   Sabaghnia N, 2008, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V146, P571, DOI 10.1017/S0021859608007831
   Sabaghnia Naser, 2013, Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, V78, P119
   Safavi S M, 2017, J CROP BREEDING, V9, P125, DOI [10.29252/jcb.9.22.125, DOI 10.29252/JCB.9.22.125]
   Shafii Bahman, 1998, Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics, V3, P335, DOI 10.2307/1400587
   Sneller CH, 1997, CROP SCI, V37, P383, DOI 10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700020013x
   Tarakanovas P., 2006, Agronomy Research, V4, P91
   Tollenaar M, 2002, FIELD CROP RES, V75, P161, DOI 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00024-2
   Zali H., 2012, Annals of Biological Research, V3, P3126
   Zhang Z., 1998, Acta Agron. Sin., V24, P304
   Zobel R. W., 1993, Proceedings of the Workshop on Adaptation of plants to soil stresses, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA, 1-4 Aug. 1993., P80
NR 33
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 0
U2 7
PU GALENOS PUBL HOUSE
PI ISTANBUL
PA Kacamak Sokak 21/1, ISTANBUL, Findikzade, TURKEY
SN 1300-7580
EI 2148-9297
J9 J AGR SCI-TARIM BILI
JI J. Agric. Sci.-Tarim Bilim. Derg.
PY 2021
VL 27
IS 2
BP 146
EP 154
DI 10.15832/ankutbd.574082
PG 9
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA SM3IS
UT WOS:000657504000005
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wang, YL
   Li, XR
   Liu, LC
   Zhao, JC
   Song, G
   Zhou, YY
AF Wang, YanLi
   Li, XinRong
   Liu, LiChao
   Zhao, JieCai
   Song, Guang
   Zhou, YuanYuan
TI Dormancy and germination strategies of a desert winter annual
   <i>Echinops gmelini</i> Turcz. in a temperate desert of China
SO ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE dormancy; Echinops gmelini Turcz; germination; temperate desert; winter
   annual
ID BIOLOGICAL SOIL CRUSTS; SEED-GERMINATION; TENGGER-DESERT; VEGETATION;
   DYNAMICS; SURVIVAL; BANK; STABILIZATION; POPULATION; EMERGENCE
AB Echinops gmelini Turcz. is an annual Asteraceae species widely distributed in the desert habitats of northern China. However, little is known about how this species adapts to harsh desert habitats. In this study, E. gmelini germination behaviors were observed in a natural population at the southeastern edge of the Tengger Desert. In addition, the effects of temperature, light, hydration-dehydration (H-D) cycles and different storage conditions on seed germination were tested in the laboratory. E. gmelini behaves as a winter annual, and its seeds germinate during the summer and early autumn in the field. Fresh seeds have non-deep physiological dormancy (PD). A 15-day dry storage treatment under laboratory conditions was required to break PD. Non-dormant seeds can germinate rapidly and at a high rate in light at 30/20 degrees C. Dry storage with seasonal temperature changes had little effect on seed germination and dormancy. However, under natural field conditions, greater and faster germination at a wide range of temperatures was observed after seeds were stored for 1-2 months, which allows seeds to germinate during short periods of moisture availability; seeds were induced into secondary dormancy after storage for 3 months which may prevent germination in autumn. Furthermore, seed germination was reduced and became faster after exposure to four or more H-D cycles. Our results suggest that precipitation is the key factor in determining E. gmelini seed germination time in natural habitats, and they provide information about the strategies that annual plants need to adapt to climatically unpredictable environments in temperate deserts.
C1 [Wang, YanLi; Li, XinRong; Liu, LiChao; Zhao, JieCai; Song, Guang; Zhou, YuanYuan] Chinese Acad Sci, Northwest Inst Eco Environm & Resources, Shapotou Desert Res & Expt Stn, 320 Donggang West Rd, Lanzhou 73000, Gansu, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, YanLi; Zhou, YuanYuan] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.
C3 Chinese Academy of Sciences; Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of
   Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS
RP Li, XR (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Northwest Inst Eco Environm & Resources, Shapotou Desert Res & Expt Stn, 320 Donggang West Rd, Lanzhou 73000, Gansu, Peoples R China.
EM lxinrong@lzb.ac.cn
RI Li, Xinrong/GNW-6025-2022; wang, yanli/G-3306-2010
FU Creative Research Groups of China [41621001]; National Natural Science
   Foundation of China [41530746, 41671210, 41501110, 31500370]; Foundation
   for Excellent Youth Scholars of NIEER
FX Creative Research Groups of China, Grant/Award Number: 41621001;
   National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Numbers:
   41530746, 41671210, 41501110, 31500370; Foundation for Excellent Youth
   Scholars of NIEER,
CR Adams R, 1999, J ARID ENVIRON, V43, P437, DOI 10.1006/jare.1999.0567
   Adondakis S, 2004, ECOLOGY, V85, P2582, DOI 10.1890/03-0587
   [Anonymous], 2018, The Free Encyclopedia
   [Anonymous], 2013, Contribution of working group i to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
   [Anonymous], ENV QUALITY ECOSYS A
   Baskin C. C., 2014, CROP SCI, V40, P564, DOI [DOI 10.2135/CROPSCI2000.0009BR, 10.2135/cropsci2000.0009br]
   BASKIN CC, 1993, J ECOL, V81, P551, DOI 10.2307/2261533
   BASKIN JM, 1976, NEW PHYTOL, V77, P619, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1976.tb04654.x
   BASKIN JM, 1971, B TORREY BOT CLUB, V98, P272, DOI 10.2307/2483627
   BASKIN JM, 1974, CAN J BOT, V52, P2439, DOI 10.1139/b74-318
   BASKIN JM, 1982, ECOLOGY, V63, P248, DOI 10.2307/1937049
   BASKIN JM, 1973, B TORREY BOT CLUB, V100, P110, DOI 10.2307/2484399
   CAVANAGH A K, 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, V91, P161
   COHEN D, 1966, J THEOR BIOL, V12, P119, DOI 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90188-3
   Commander LE, 2017, PLANT ECOL, V218, P1077, DOI 10.1007/s11258-017-0753-7
   Dubrovsky JG, 1996, AM J BOT, V83, P624, DOI 10.2307/2445922
   Dwyer JM, 2016, ECOSPHERE, V7, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1497
   El-Keblawy A., 2014, SABKHA ECOSYSTEMS, P93
   GRIME JP, 1981, ANN APPL BIOL, V98, P555, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1981.tb00792.x
   Gutiérrez JR, 2003, OECOLOGIA, V134, P511, DOI 10.1007/s00442-002-1156-5
   Gutterman Y, 1998, PLANT SOIL, V204, P223, DOI 10.1023/A:1004314017674
   Gutterman Y., 1993, SEED GERMINATION DES
   Huang L, 2017, J ARID LAND, V9, P176, DOI 10.1007/s40333-017-0010-x
   Huxman TE, 2013, AM J BOT, V100, P1369, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1200463
   Li XR, 2007, PLANT SOIL, V300, P221, DOI 10.1007/s11104-007-9407-1
   Li XR, 2010, HYDROL PROCESS, V24, P3621, DOI 10.1002/hyp.7791
   Li XR, 2005, PLANT SOIL, V277, P375, DOI 10.1007/s11104-005-8162-4
   Li XR, 2003, PLANT SOIL, V251, P237, DOI 10.1023/A:1023023702248
   Liu K, 2013, SEED SCI RES, V23, P163, DOI 10.1017/S0960258513000135
   López-Urrutia E, 2014, SEED SCI RES, V24, P91, DOI 10.1017/S0960258513000317
   Moriuchi KS, 2000, ECOLOGY, V81, P1133, DOI 10.2307/177184
   MOTT JJ, 1974, J ECOL, V62, P699, DOI 10.2307/2258950
   NEWMAN EI, 1963, J ECOL, V51, P625, DOI 10.2307/2257751
   Pons T. L., SEEDS
   REGEHR DL, 1979, J ECOL, V67, P923, DOI 10.2307/2259221
   SCIFRES CJ, 1969, J RANGE MANAGE, V22, P334, DOI 10.2307/3895877
   Shi Z., 1987, FLORA REIPUBLICAE PO, V78
   THOMPSON PA, 1970, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V23, P739, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1970.tb06468.x
   Tobe K, 2005, ANN BOT-LONDON, V95, P649, DOI 10.1093/aob/mci060
   Venable DL, 2007, ECOLOGY, V88, P1086, DOI 10.1890/06-1495
   Venable D. Lawrence, 1993, Plant Species Biology, V8, P207, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-1984.1993.tb00071.x
   VENABLE DL, 1985, AM NAT, V126, P577, DOI 10.1086/284440
   Wang Gang, 1995, Acta Botanica Sinica, V37, P231
   Wang GY, 2017, PLANT SOIL, V421, P465, DOI 10.1007/s11104-017-3400-0
   WENT FW, 1949, ECOLOGY, V30, P1, DOI 10.2307/1932273
   WENT FW, 1948, ECOLOGY, V29, P242, DOI 10.2307/1930988
   Werle R, 2014, WEED SCI, V62, P83, DOI 10.1614/WS-D-13-00091.1
   Zhang ZS, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep26030
   Zhou YM, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0140983
   Zhu YJ, 2014, PLANT SOIL, V374, P399, DOI 10.1007/s11104-013-1892-9
NR 50
TC 6
Z9 8
U1 0
U2 33
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0912-3814
EI 1440-1703
J9 ECOL RES
JI Ecol. Res.
PD JAN
PY 2019
VL 34
IS 1
BP 74
EP 84
DI 10.1111/1440-1703.1004
PG 11
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA HJ3UF
UT WOS:000457098500013
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Tabor, K
   Hewson, J
   Tien, H
   González-Roglich, M
   Hole, D
   Williams, JW
AF Tabor, Karyn
   Hewson, Jennifer
   Tien, Hsin
   Gonzalez-Roglich, Mariano
   Hole, David
   Williams, John W.
TI Tropical Protected Areas Under Increasing Threats from Climate Change
   and Deforestation
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE protected areas; climate change; deforestation; tropics; biodiversity;
   conservation
ID LAND-USE CHANGE; PROJECTED IMPACTS; EXTINCTION RISK; BIODIVERSITY
   CONSERVATION; FOREST; RESPONSES; BENEFITS; FUTURE; WORLDS; COVER
AB Identifying protected areas most susceptible to climate change and deforestation represents critical information for determining conservation investments. Development of effective landscape interventions is required to ensure the preservation and protection of these areas essential to ecosystem service provision, provide high biodiversity value, and serve a critical habitat connectivity role. We identified vulnerable protected areas in the humid tropical forest biome using climate metrics for 2050 and future deforestation risk for 2024 modeled from historical deforestation and global drivers of deforestation. Results show distinct continental and regional patterns of combined threats to protected areas. Eleven Mha (2%) of global humid tropical protected area was exposed to the highest combined threats and should be prioritized for investments in landscape interventions focused on adaptation to climate stressors. Global tropical protected area exposed to the lowest deforestation risk but highest climate risks totaled 135 Mha (26%). Thirty-five percent of South America's protected area fell into this risk category and should be prioritized for increasing protected area size and connectivity to facilitate species movement. Global humid tropical protected area exposed to a combination of the lowest deforestation and lowest climate risks totaled 89 Mha (17%), and were disproportionately located in Africa (34%) and Asia (17%), indicating opportunities for low-risk conservation investments for improved connectivity to these potential climate refugia. This type of biome-scale, protected area analysis, combining both climate change and deforestation threats, is critical to informing policies and landscape interventions to maximize investments for environmental conservation and increase ecosystem resilience to climate change.
C1 [Tabor, Karyn; Hewson, Jennifer; Tien, Hsin; Gonzalez-Roglich, Mariano; Hole, David] Conservat Int, Betty & Gordon Moore Ctr Sci, Arlington, VA 22202 USA.
   [Williams, John W.] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Geog, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
C3 Conservation International; University of Wisconsin System; University
   of Wisconsin Madison
RP Tabor, K (corresponding author), Conservat Int, Betty & Gordon Moore Ctr Sci, Arlington, VA 22202 USA.
EM ktabor@conservation.org; jhewson@conservation.org;
   tracy.hs.tien@gmail.com; mgonzalez-roglich@conservation.org;
   dhole@conservation.org; jww@geography.wisc.edu
RI Hole, David/Q-1692-2019; Williams, John/KBC-5275-2024
OI Tabor, Karyn/0000-0002-9648-3056
FU Walton Family Foundation
FX This research was made possible with a Walton Family Foundation grant
   and a gift from Betty and Gordon Moore.
CR Alagador D, 2016, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V7, P853, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12524
   Angelsen A., 2009, Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD): an options assessment report
   [Anonymous], 2010, GLOBAL LAND COVER MA
   [Anonymous], 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007
   [Anonymous], 2016, PROTECTED PLANET REP
   [Anonymous], 2005, LAST WILD PROJ VERS
   Araújo MB, 2004, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V10, P1618, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00828.x
   Asner GP, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7dab
   Asner GP, 2010, CONSERV LETT, V3, P395, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00133.x
   Austin KG, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa6a88
   Avitabile V, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P1406, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13139
   Beaudrot L, 2016, PLOS BIOL, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002357
   Bruner AG, 2004, BIOSCIENCE, V54, P1119, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[1119:FCASOM]2.0.CO;2
   Bruner AG, 2001, SCIENCE, V291, P125, DOI 10.1126/science.291.5501.125
   Burgess ND, 2017, ORYX, V51, P77, DOI 10.1017/S003060531500099X
   Dale VH, 1997, ECOL APPL, V7, P753, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0753:TRBLUC]2.0.CO;2
   Davies D.K., 2015, Time-Sensitive Remote Sensing, P165, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4939-2602-2_11, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2602-211]
   Davies TJ, 2009, AM NAT, V174, P297, DOI 10.1086/603614
   Dawson TP, 2011, SCIENCE, V332, P53, DOI 10.1126/science.1200303
   Dudley N., 2010, Natural Solutions: Protected Areas Helping People Cope with Climate Change
   Eastman J.R., 2005, GIS SPATIAL ANAL MOD, P357
   FAO, 2015, FRA 2015 TERMS DEF
   Foden WB, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0065427
   Garcia RA, 2014, SCIENCE, V344, P486, DOI 10.1126/science.1247579
   Geldmann J, 2013, BIOL CONSERV, V161, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.02.018
   Hales S., 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
   Hannah L, 2005, BIOSCIENCE, V55, P231, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0231:TVFTCE]2.0.CO;2
   Hansen AJ, 2001, BIOSCIENCE, V51, P765, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0765:GCIFRO]2.0.CO;2
   Hansen AJ, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P974, DOI 10.1890/05-1098
   Hanson MA, 2012, SCIENCE, V335, P851, DOI [10.1126/science.1244693, 10.1126/science.1215904]
   Harper GJ, 2007, ENVIRON CONSERV, V34, P325, DOI 10.1017/S0376892907004262
   Hewson J., ENV RES LETT UNPUB
   Hewson Jenny, 2008, Biodiversity (Ottawa), V9, P100
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   Hijmans RJ, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P2272, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01256.x
   Hoffmann M, 2010, SCIENCE, V330, P1503, DOI 10.1126/science.1194442
   Hole DG, 2009, ECOL LETT, V12, P420, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01297.x
   Hurlbert AH, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P13384, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0704469104
   IUCN UNEP-WCMC, UNEP WCMC WORLD DAT
   Jetz W, 2007, PLOS BIOL, V5, P1211, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050157
   Johnstone JF, 2016, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V14, P369, DOI 10.1002/fee.1311
   Jones KR, 2018, SCIENCE, V360, P788, DOI 10.1126/science.aap9565
   Keenan RJ, 2015, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V352, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.014
   Keppel G, 2012, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V21, P393, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00686.x
   Laurance WF, 2012, NATURE, V489, P290, DOI 10.1038/nature11318
   Lawler JJ, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P1014, DOI 10.1111/ele.12132
   Lele S, 2010, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V2, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.006
   Loarie SR, 2009, NATURE, V462, P1052, DOI 10.1038/nature08649
   Mahony CR, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P3934, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13645
   Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), 2005, A Report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
   Mora C, 2013, NATURE, V502, P183, DOI 10.1038/nature12540
   Moss RH, 2010, NATURE, V463, P747, DOI 10.1038/nature08823
   Musinsky J, 2018, REMOTE SENS ECOL CON, V4, P189, DOI 10.1002/rse2.78
   Naidoo R, 2007, BIOL CONSERV, V140, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.025
   Nepstad D, 2014, SCIENCE, V344, P1118, DOI 10.1126/science.1248525
   NGA, 2000, VECT MAP LEV 0 DIG C
   Nuñez TA, 2013, CONSERV BIOL, V27, P407, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12014
   Olson DM, 2001, BIOSCIENCE, V51, P933, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2
   Ordonez A, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P1104, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3127, 10.1038/nclimate3127]
   Pacifici M, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P215, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2448
   Parmesan C, 2003, NATURE, V421, P37, DOI 10.1038/nature01286
   Petrica L, 2016, APPL ACOUST, V113, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.06.022
   Pimm SL, 2000, NATURE, V403, P843, DOI 10.1038/35002708
   Pratihast AK, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0150935
   Pringle RM, 2017, NATURE, V546, P91, DOI 10.1038/nature22902
   Radeloff VC, 2015, ECOL APPL, V25, P2051, DOI 10.1890/14-1781.1
   Rodrigues ASL, 2004, NATURE, V428, P640, DOI 10.1038/nature02422
   Root TL, 2003, NATURE, V421, P57, DOI 10.1038/nature01333
   Schaafsma M, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V24, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.018
   Segurado P, 2004, J BIOGEOGR, V31, P1555, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01076.x
   Siebert S., 2013, Global Map of Irrigation Areas version 5
   Spracklen BD, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0143886
   Tabor Karyn, 2010, Journal of East African Natural History, V99, P19, DOI 10.2982/028.099.0102
   Tabor K, 2010, ECOL APPL, V20, P554, DOI 10.1890/09-0173.1
   Thomas CD, 2004, NATURE, V427, P145, DOI 10.1038/nature02121
   Urban MC, 2015, SCIENCE, V348, P571, DOI 10.1126/science.aaa4984
   USGS, 2011, GLOB MULT TERR EL DA
   Walther GR, 2002, NATURE, V416, P389, DOI 10.1038/416389a
   Wiens JA, 2011, BIOL CONSERV, V144, P2119, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.05.002
   Williams JW, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P5738, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0606292104
   Zabel F, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0107522
NR 81
TC 29
Z9 31
U1 4
U2 73
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD SEP
PY 2018
VL 7
IS 3
AR 90
DI 10.3390/land7030090
PG 14
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA GX7FK
UT WOS:000447930100012
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Canale, CI
   Henry, PY
AF Canale, Cindy I.
   Henry, Pierre-Yves
TI Adaptive phenotypic plasticity and resilience of vertebrates to
   increasing climatic unpredictability
SO CLIMATE RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Physiological flexibility; Global change; Environmental variability;
   Extreme climatic events; Morphology; Energy saving; Reproduction
ID FACULTATIVE HYPOTHERMIC RESPONSES; LEMURS MICROCEBUS-MURINUS; EL-NINO
   EVENTS; DAILY TORPOR; GEOGRAPHIC-VARIATION; BODY-SIZE; PHYSIOLOGICAL
   FLEXIBILITY; ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES; AMBIENT-TEMPERATURE; THERMAL
   PLASTICITY
AB As ecosystems undergo global changes, there is increasing interest in understanding how organisms respond to changing environments. Recent evidence drawn from available vertebrate studies suggests that most of the phenotypic responses to climate change would be due to plasticity. We hypothesize that organisms that have evolved in unpredictable environments inform us about the mechanisms of phenotypic plasticity which provide an adaptive response to climate instability. As climate changes increase climatic hazards, these resilience mechanisms are expected to spread within species, populations and communities. We review studies that have demonstrated the importance of phenotypic plasticity in different life-history traits in overcoming climate uncertainty. We focus on organisms from unstable, recurrently energetically restrictive environments which possess a variety of morphological, physiological and/or behavioural adaptations to climate-driven selective pressures. First, we treat plastic morphological changes in response to fluctuating food availability. Adjustment of morphometric traits and/or organ size to energy supply would be essential in harsh environments. Second, we review the role of flexible energy-saving mechanisms, such as daily torpor, hibernation and energy storage, in overcoming climate-driven energetic shortages. Lastly, we address the role of plastic modulation of reproduction in fine-tuning the energy allocation to offspring production according to environmental conditions, with an emphasis on opportunistic breeding. Overall, we predict that species (or genotypes) possessing these efficient physiological mechanisms of resilience to unpredictable water and food fluctuations will be selectively advantaged in the face of increasing climatic instability.
C1 [Canale, Cindy I.; Henry, Pierre-Yves] MNHN, CNRS, UMR 7179, Dept Ecol & Gest Biodivers, F-91800 Brunoy, France.
C3 Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle (MNHN); Centre National de la
   Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); CNRS - Institute of Ecology & Environment
   (INEE)
RP Canale, CI (corresponding author), MNHN, CNRS, UMR 7179, Dept Ecol & Gest Biodivers, 1 Ave Petit Chateau, F-91800 Brunoy, France.
EM henry@mnhn.fr
RI Henry, Pierre-Yves/G-3139-2013
OI Henry, Pierre-Yves/0000-0003-2255-7347
FU European Science Foundation
FX We thank 2 anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, the
   coordinators of the European Science Foundation-funded projects
   ThermAdapt and ConGen for inviting us to present our ideas in this
   special issue, CSIRO Publishing for the authorization to reproduce Fig.
   1 from Allan et al. (1996), and A. Courivaud for the adaptation of Fig.
   1.
CR Allan R., 1996, El Nino: Southern Oscillation and Climatic Variability
   Alley RB, 2004, SCI AM, V291, P62, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican1104-62
   Araújo MB, 2007, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V22, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010
   Bozinovic F, 1997, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V41, P23, DOI 10.1007/s004840050049
   Bozinovic F, 2007, J COMP PHYSIOL B, V177, P393, DOI 10.1007/s00360-006-0137-0
   Bradshaw WE, 2006, SCIENCE, V312, P1477, DOI 10.1126/science.1127000
   Broecker WS, 1997, SCIENCE, V278, P1582, DOI 10.1126/science.278.5343.1582
   Brommer JE, 2008, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V275, P687, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2007.0951
   Carey HV, 2005, PHYSIOLOGICAL ADAPTATIONS TO FEEDING INVERTEBRATES, P229
   Cavieres G, 2008, FUNCT ECOL, V22, P509, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01382.x
   Charmantier A, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P800, DOI 10.1126/science.1157174
   Chown SL, 2010, CLIM RES, V43, P3, DOI 10.3354/cr00879
   CHRISTIAN DP, 1979, J MAMMAL, V60, P679, DOI 10.2307/1380185
   Cooper ML, 1998, AUST J ZOOL, V46, P145, DOI 10.1071/ZO97057
   Coppack T, 2004, ADV ECOL RES, V35, P131, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2504(04)35007-5
   Cynx J, 2001, J COMP PSYCHOL, V115, P196, DOI 10.1037//0735-7036.115.2.196
   Dausmann KH, 2009, J COMP PHYSIOL B, V179, P345, DOI 10.1007/s00360-008-0318-0
   Dausmann KH, 2005, J COMP PHYSIOL B, V175, P147, DOI 10.1007/s00360-004-0470-0
   Davis MB, 2005, ECOLOGY, V86, P1704, DOI 10.1890/03-0788
   Dawson A, 2008, PHILOS T R SOC B, V363, P1621, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2007.0004
   de Jong MA, 2010, CLIM RES, V43, P91, DOI 10.3354/cr00881
   DEJONG G, 1995, AM NAT, V145, P493, DOI 10.1086/285752
   del Valle JC, 2006, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS A, V145, P397, DOI 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.07.013
   DeWitt TJ, 1998, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V13, P77, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01274-3
   Durant JM, 2007, CLIM RES, V33, P271, DOI 10.3354/cr033271
   Easterling DR, 2000, SCIENCE, V289, P2068, DOI 10.1126/science.289.5487.2068
   Fischer K, 2010, CLIM RES, V43, P17, DOI 10.3354/cr00892
   Foden W., 2008, The 2008 Review of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
   Geiser F, 2000, J COMP PHYSIOL B, V170, P153, DOI 10.1007/s003600050270
   Geiser F, 2004, ANNU REV PHYSIOL, V66, P239, DOI 10.1146/annurev.physiol.66.032102.115105
   GEISER F, 1994, AUST J ZOOL, V42, P1, DOI 10.1071/ZO9940001
   Geiser F., 2006, FUNCTIONAL EVOLUTION, P5, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780195154726.001.0001
   Geiser F, 2007, NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, V94, P941, DOI 10.1007/s00114-007-0274-7
   Geiser Fritz, 2010, Australian Zoologist, V35, P204
   Geiser F, 2009, NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, V96, P1235, DOI 10.1007/s00114-009-0583-0
   Génin F, 2003, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS B, V136, P71, DOI 10.1016/S1096-4959(03)00172-6
   Ghalambor CK, 2007, FUNCT ECOL, V21, P394, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01283.x
   Gienapp P, 2008, MOL ECOL, V17, P167, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03413.x
   Gienapp P, 2007, CLIM RES, V35, P25, DOI 10.3354/cr00712
   Giroud S, 2008, AM J PHYSIOL-REG I, V294, pR1958, DOI 10.1152/ajpregu.00794.2007
   GLANZ WE, 1982, ECOLOGY TROPICAL FOR, P285
   Grant PR, 2000, ECOLOGY, V81, P2442, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2442:EOENOE]2.0.CO;2
   Hahn TP, 2008, GEN COMP ENDOCR, V157, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.ygcen.2008.05.007
   Hannah L, 2008, BIOL LETTERS, V4, P590, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0270
   Hau M, 2004, OIKOS, V106, P489, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13206.x
   Hau M, 2001, HORM BEHAV, V40, P281, DOI 10.1006/hbeh.2001.1673
   Hendry AP, 2008, MOL ECOL, V17, P20, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03428.x
   Holmgren M, 2001, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V16, P89, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02052-8
   HOLT RD, 1990, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V5, P311, DOI 10.1016/0169-5347(90)90088-U
   Humphries MM, 2003, PHYSIOL BIOCHEM ZOOL, V76, P165, DOI 10.1086/367950
   Jackson C, 2005, REPROD FERT DEVELOP, V17, P393, DOI 10.1071/RD04134
   Joubert D, 2010, CLIM RES, V43, P57, DOI 10.3354/cr00883
   Kearney M, 2009, ECOL LETT, V12, P334, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01277.x
   Körtner G, 2000, NATURE, V407, P318, DOI 10.1038/35030297
   Kortner G, 2009, NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, V96, P525, DOI 10.1007/s00114-008-0492-7
   Lande R, 2009, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V22, P1435, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01754.x
   Lepetz V, 2009, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V18, P3185, DOI 10.1007/s10531-009-9636-0
   Liow LH, 2009, AM NAT, V173, P264, DOI 10.1086/595756
   Loehr VJT, 2007, OECOLOGIA, V153, P479, DOI 10.1007/s00442-007-0738-7
   Lovegrove BG, 2000, LIFE IN THE COLD, P29
   Lovegrove BG, 2001, J COMP PHYSIOL B, V171, P11, DOI 10.1007/s003600000140
   Lovegrove BG, 1998, J COMP PHYSIOL B, V168, P303, DOI 10.1007/s003600050150
   Maddocks TA, 2007, J ORNITHOL, V148, P571, DOI 10.1007/s10336-007-0205-6
   McKechnie AE, 2002, CONDOR, V104, P705, DOI 10.1650/0010-5422(2002)104[0705:AFHRAR]2.0.CO;2
   McKechnie AE, 2001, J COMP PHYSIOL B, V171, P507
   McKechnie AE, 2003, J COMP PHYSIOL B, V173, P339, DOI 10.1007/s00360-003-0341-0
   MESERVE PL, 1995, J MAMMAL, V76, P580, DOI 10.2307/1382367
   Millien V, 2006, ECOL LETT, V9, P853, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00928.x
   MORRIS DESMOND, 1962, PROC ZOOL SOC LONDON, V139, P701
   Mysterud A, 2001, NATURE, V410, P1096, DOI 10.1038/35074099
   Naya DE, 2006, FUNCT ECOL, V20, P601, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01137.x
   Naya DE, 2005, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS A, V140, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.cbpb.2004.11.006
   Nussey DH, 2007, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V20, P831, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01300.x
   Nussey DH, 2005, SCIENCE, V310, P304, DOI 10.1126/science.1117004
   Parmesan C, 2000, B AM METEOROL SOC, V81, P443, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<0443:IOEWAC>2.3.CO;2
   Pavey CR, 2009, NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, V96, P679, DOI 10.1007/s00114-009-0516-y
   Pereyra ME, 2005, BRAIN BEHAV EVOLUT, V66, P35, DOI 10.1159/000085046
   Perfito N, 2008, HORM BEHAV, V53, P567, DOI 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.01.002
   Pertoldi C, 2007, J THERM BIOL, V32, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2007.01.011
   Pettorelli N, 2005, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V20, P503, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.011
   Piersma T, 1997, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V12, P134, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01003-3
   Piersma T, 2003, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V18, P228, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00036-3
   Pigliucci M, 1996, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V11, P168, DOI 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10008-2
   Pigliucci M, 2005, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V20, P481, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2005.06.001
   Previtali MA, 2010, CONSERV BIOL, V24, P18, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01407.x
   Price TD, 2003, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V270, P1433, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2003.2372
   Przybylo R, 2000, J ANIM ECOL, V69, P395, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00401.x
   Pulido F, 2004, ADV ECOL RES, V35, P151, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2504(04)35008-7
   Pulido F, 2007, CLIM RES, V35, P5, DOI 10.3354/cr00711
   Radespiel Ute, 2006, P211, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-34586-4_10
   Réale D, 2003, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V270, P591, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2002.2224
   Reed TE, 2009, J ANIM ECOL, V78, P376, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01503.x
   Sabat P, 2005, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS A, V140, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.cbpb.2004.11.010
   Scheuerlein A, 2002, J BIOL RHYTHM, V17, P171, DOI 10.1177/074873002129002465
   Schleucher E, 2004, PHYSIOL BIOCHEM ZOOL, V77, P942, DOI 10.1086/423744
   Schmid J, 2000, J COMP PHYSIOL B, V170, P633, DOI 10.1007/s003600000146
   Schmid J, 2001, INT J PRIMATOL, V22, P1021, DOI 10.1023/A:1012069706237
   Schmid J, 2000, OECOLOGIA, V123, P175, DOI 10.1007/s004420051003
   Séguy M, 2005, J COMP PHYSIOL B, V175, P107, DOI 10.1007/s00360-004-0467-8
   Shimada M, 2010, POPUL ECOL, V52, P5, DOI 10.1007/s10144-009-0187-8
   SIKDAR M, 1992, J EXP ZOOL, V264, P82, DOI 10.1002/jez.1402640112
   Simmons RE, 2004, OSTRICH, V75, P295, DOI 10.2989/00306520409485458
   Smith FA, 2004, AM NAT, V163, P672, DOI 10.1086/382898
   Solomon S, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1
   Starck JM, 1999, ZOOL ANZ, V238, P87
   Stawski C, 2009, J COMP PHYSIOL B, V179, P433, DOI 10.1007/s00360-008-0328-y
   Stenseth NC, 2003, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V270, P2087, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2003.2415
   Stenseth NC, 2002, SCIENCE, V297, P1292, DOI 10.1126/science.1071281
   Sultan SE, 2002, AM NAT, V160, P271, DOI 10.1086/341015
   Tejedo M, 2010, CLIM RES, V43, P31, DOI 10.3354/cr00878
   Teplitsky C, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P13492, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0800999105
   Thomas CD, 2004, NATURE, V427, P145, DOI 10.1038/nature02121
   Tieleman BI, 2003, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V270, P207, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2002.2205
   Trotta V, 2010, CLIM RES, V43, P71, DOI 10.3354/cr00880
   Turbill C, 2008, J COMP PHYSIOL B, V178, P597, DOI 10.1007/s00360-007-0249-1
   Van Buskirk J, 2009, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V22, P852, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01685.x
   VANTIENDEREN PH, 1991, EVOLUTION, V45, P1317, DOI [10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb02638.x, 10.2307/2409882]
   Visser ME, 2008, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V275, P649, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2007.0997
   Walther GR, 2002, NATURE, V416, P389, DOI 10.1038/416389a
   Wang CZ, 2006, PROG OCEANOGR, V69, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.pocean.2006.03.004
   Wang GL, 2003, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V28, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105444
   West-Eberhard Mary Jane, 2003, pi
   Wikelski M, 1997, ECOLOGY, V78, P2204, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2204:ELTBSI]2.0.CO;2
   Wikelski M, 2000, NATURE, V403, P37, DOI 10.1038/47396
   Wingfield JC, 2003, ANIM BEHAV, V66, P807, DOI 10.1006/anbe.2003.2298
   Wingfield JC, 2008, GEN COMP ENDOCR, V157, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.ygcen.2008.04.017
   Yeh PJ, 2004, AM NAT, V164, P531, DOI 10.1086/423825
   Yeh SW, 2009, NATURE, V461, P511, DOI 10.1038/nature08316
   Yom-Tov Y, 2006, OECOLOGIA, V148, P213, DOI 10.1007/s00442-006-0364-9
   Zhao ZJ, 2009, PHYSIOL BIOCHEM ZOOL, V82, P504, DOI 10.1086/603630
NR 130
TC 114
Z9 131
U1 2
U2 95
PU INTER-RESEARCH
PI OLDENDORF LUHE
PA NORDBUNTE 23, D-21385 OLDENDORF LUHE, GERMANY
SN 0936-577X
EI 1616-1572
J9 CLIM RES
JI Clim. Res.
PY 2010
VL 43
IS 1-2
BP 135
EP 147
DI 10.3354/cr00897
PG 13
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA 637PH
UT WOS:000280830000014
OA Green Published, Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sarkar, S
   Maity, R
AF Sarkar, Subharthi
   Maity, Rajib
TI Towards the Development of a Comprehensive Heatwave Proneness Index and
   Identification of Hotspots Across Indian Mainland
SO JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
LA English
DT Article
DE heatwave; Heat-Wave Proneness Index (HWPI); Heat-Wave Magnitude Index
   daily (HWMId); climate change; CMIP6
ID WAVES; TRENDS; CMIP5
AB Heatwaves (HWs) are one of the key-emerging climatic hazards, with increasing duration, severity, and frequency all over the globe. Identifying HW-prone regions and their evolving patterns is therefore essential for effective climate adaptation. To address this, we introduce the "Heat-Wave Proneness Index (HWPI)," a novel metric to identify the key-exposed regions or hotspots by integrating three key HW attributes-(a) the maximum annual HW magnitude, (b) the mean HW magnitude excluding the maximum (MeanX), and (c) the annual frequency (Frq) of HW events. By applying HWPI across the Indian mainland, we demonstrate its superiority to capture diverse regional variations in HW-exposure more effectively than one of the widely-used HW-indices-Heat-Wave Magnitude Index daily (HWMId). Further to validate the reliability of the proposed index, top 10 HW-affected years are identified across India since 1951, out of which four are found from the recent past decade (2010-2019) itself. A comprehensive spatiotemporal analysis is also conducted using the proposed HWPI, over the historical (1951-2020) and future (2021-2050) periods, which reveals the western, central, north-eastern and western peninsular India to be the most HW-prone regions in the country. India as a whole will experience approx. two-fold increase in HW- proneness toward mid-century relative to the 1981-2010 baseline, as depicted from the multi-model multi-scenario analysis. Overall, we expect the newly proposed HWPI and visual identification of the future-projected HW-prone regions will not only be useful to the scientific community but also for the policymakers to build climate-informed decisions sufficiently in advance.
C1 [Sarkar, Subharthi; Maity, Rajib] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Dept Civil Engn, Kharagpur, W Bengal, India.
C3 Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT System); Indian Institute of
   Technology (IIT) - Kharagpur
RP Maity, R (corresponding author), Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Dept Civil Engn, Kharagpur, W Bengal, India.
EM rajib@civil.iitkgp.ac.in
RI Maity, Rajib/AAP-9797-2020
FU Ministry of Earth Sciences [MoES/PAMC/H&C/124/2019-PC-II]; Ministry of
   Earth Science (MoES); Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology
   (MeitY); Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India
FX This study is supported by a sponsored project supported by Ministry of
   Earth Science (MoES), Govt. of India, through a sponsored project (Grant
   MoES/PAMC/H&C/124/2019-PC-II). Authors further acknowledge the National
   Supercomputing Mission (NSM) for providing computing resources of 'PARAM
   Shakti' at IIT Kharagpur, which is implemented by C-DAC and supported by
   the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) and
   Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India.
   Finally, the authors thank the editors and two anonymous reviewers whose
   constructive comments immensely improved the manuscript.
CR Aadhar S, 2017, SCI DATA, V4, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2017.145
   Amou M, 2021, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/atmos12010037
   Awasthi A, 2022, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V147, P589, DOI 10.1007/s00704-021-03854-z
   Bröde P, 2012, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V56, P481, DOI 10.1007/s00484-011-0454-1
   Ceccherini G, 2017, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V17, P115, DOI 10.5194/nhess-17-115-2017
   Chen CA, 2021, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V31, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2021.100303
   Confalonieri U, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P391
   D'Ippoliti D, 2010, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V9, DOI 10.1186/1476-069X-9-37
   Das PK, 2020, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V142, P497, DOI 10.1007/s00704-020-03329-7
   De US, 1998, CURR SCI INDIA, V75, P1308
   Di Luca A, 2020, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V47, DOI 10.1029/2020GL088031
   Dunne JP, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P563, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1827
   Gidden MJ, 2019, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V12, P1443, DOI 10.5194/gmd-12-1443-2019
   Gruber S, 2004, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V31, DOI 10.1029/2004GL020051
   Hari M, 2021, ACTA GEOPHYS, V69, P1447, DOI 10.1007/s11600-021-00603-8
   Jendritzky G, 2012, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V56, P421, DOI 10.1007/s00484-011-0513-7
   Kapwata T, 2022, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V21, DOI 10.1186/s12940-022-00921-4
   Kishore P, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-07373-3
   Koppe C., 2004, Global Environmental Change Series, VNo. 2
   Kotharkar R, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100777
   Kovats RS, 2004, OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V61, P893, DOI 10.1136/oem.2003.012047
   Li JJ, 2021, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3389/feart.2021.687976
   Lin CG, 2022, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V13, P1197, DOI 10.5194/esd-13-1197-2022
   Maity R, 2019, J HYDROMETEOROL, V20, P595, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-18-0126.1
   Mazdiyasni O, 2017, SCI ADV, V3, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1700066
   Mishra V, 2020, SCI DATA, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41597-020-00681-1
   Mishra V, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa9388
   Mishra V, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/2/024005
   Mohammad P., 2024, Nexus, V1, DOI [10.1016/j.ynexs.2024.100027, DOI 10.1016/J.YNEXS.2024.100027]
   Murari KK, 2015, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V15, P569, DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0660-6
   Pai DS, 2013, MAUSAM, V64, P585
   Porfiriev B, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V7, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.007
   Poumadère M, 2005, RISK ANAL, V25, P1483, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00694.x
   Raha S, 2020, ENVIRONMETRICS, V31, DOI 10.1002/env.2626
   Ramamurthy K., 1972, Indian Journal of Meteorology and Geophysics, V23, P165
   Rao KK, 2023, ENVIRON RES-CLIM, V2, DOI 10.1088/2752-5295/acb077
   Ratnam JV, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep24395
   Robine JM, 2008, CR BIOL, V331, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.crvi.2007.12.001
   Rohini P, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep26153
   Romanello M, 2022, LANCET, V400, P1619, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01540-9
   Russo S, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124003
   Russo S, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V119, P12500, DOI 10.1002/2014JD022098
   Sarkar S, 2024, INT J CLIMATOL, V44, P627, DOI 10.1002/joc.8348
   Sarkar S, 2023, J HYDROL, V623, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129805
   Satyanarayana GC, 2020, ATMOS RES, V245, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105078
   Schär C, 2004, NATURE, V432, P559, DOI 10.1038/432559a
   Sharma S, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-15896-3
   Singh S, 2021, INT J CLIMATOL, V41, pE1831, DOI 10.1002/joc.6814
   Srivastava AK, 2009, ATMOS SCI LETT, V10, P249, DOI 10.1002/asl.232
   STEADMAN RG, 1979, J APPL METEOROL, V18, P861, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1979)018<0861:TAOSPI>2.0.CO;2
   STEADMAN RG, 1984, J CLIM APPL METEOROL, V23, P1674, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<1674:AUSOAT>2.0.CO;2
   Taylor KE, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P485, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
   Wang D, 2021, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/atmos12070867
NR 53
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PU AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
PI WASHINGTON
PA 2000 FLORIDA AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20009 USA
SN 2169-897X
EI 2169-8996
J9 J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS
JI J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.
PD DEC 16
PY 2024
VL 129
IS 23
AR e2024JD041775
DI 10.1029/2024JD041775
PG 20
WC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA O3O0G
UT WOS:001370251100001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Luo, Y
   Cheng, X
   He, BJ
   Dewancker, BJ
AF Luo, Y.
   Cheng, X.
   He, B. -j.
   Dewancker, B. J.
TI Identification and assessment of heat disaster risk: a comprehensive
   framework based on hazard, exposure, adaptation and vulnerability
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Urban heat; Disaster risk; Risk assessment; Risk identification; Urban
   planning
ID URBAN HEAT; HEALTH-RISK; CLIMATE; ISLAND; GREEN; TEMPERATURES; INDEX
AB With the rise in global temperatures and frequent occurrence of extreme heat events, overheating disasters pose significant threats to the health, safety, and economic activities of urban residents. Existing methods for heat risk assessment often focus on single-dimensional analysis, neglecting the comprehensive consideration of multiple dimensions such as hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and adaptability. These methods also fail to accurately select risk indicators by integrating diverse data sources, making it difficult to capture the spatial heterogeneity of heat risk characteristics. To address these limitations and enhance the scientific rigor and comprehensiveness of risk assessments, this study proposes a multidimensional framework that integrates hazard, exposure, adaptability, and vulnerability to systematically assess urban heat risks during the summer. In terms of data integration, this model combines geographic meteorological data with socioeconomic data to capture the spatial heterogeneity of the heat risk. Regarding the assessment methodology, a combination of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and entropy method (EM) was suggested to ensure the scientific accuracy and practical relevance of the risk indicators. For risk visualization, the ArcGIS tool was recommended to clearly display the spatial distribution of risks, allowing for the rapid identification of high-risk areas and providing a foundation for urban management and disaster mitigation planning. By utilizing this multidimensional and multidata source integrated analysis framework, a more comprehensive identification and assessment of heat risks under extreme summer heat conditions can be achieved. This approach offers urban planners and policymakers a practical tool to improve public health management and enhance climate adaptability.
C1 [Luo, Y.; Dewancker, B. J.] Kitakyushu Univ, Fac Environm Engn, Fukuoka 8080135, Japan.
   [Cheng, X.; He, B. -j.] Chongqing Univ, Ctr Climate Resilient & Low Carbon Cities, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Key Lab New Technol Construct Cities Mt Area,Minis, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China.
   [He, B. -j.] CMA Key Open Lab Transforming Climate Resources Ec, Chongqing 401147, Peoples R China.
C3 University of Kitakyushu; Chongqing University
RP He, BJ (corresponding author), Chongqing Univ, Ctr Climate Resilient & Low Carbon Cities, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Key Lab New Technol Construct Cities Mt Area,Minis, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China.; He, BJ (corresponding author), CMA Key Open Lab Transforming Climate Resources Ec, Chongqing 401147, Peoples R China.
EM baojie.unsw@gmail.com
RI He, Bao-jie/ABC-5621-2020
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China; Urban Design in Xi'an,
   China
FX Authors would like to appreciate the valuable comments from sessional
   chairs of 4th International Conference on Urban Climate and Urban Design
   in Xi'an, China.
CR Adams QH, 2023, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V138, P955, DOI 10.1177/00333549221148174
   [Anonymous], 2024, State of the Global Climate 2023
   Arnberger A, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V21, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.012
   Aubrecht C, 2013, ENVIRON INT, V56, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2013.03.005
   Botzen WJW, 2009, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V8, P209, DOI 10.3763/ehaz.2009.0023
   Buscail C, 2012, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V11, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-11-38
   Cao Z, 2020, ENVIRON RES, V188, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109813
   Cardone B, 2023, 2023 INT C EM TECHN
   Chen SA, 2022, ATMOS MEAS TECH, V15, P735, DOI 10.5194/amt-15-735-2022
   Coutts AM, 2007, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V46, P477, DOI 10.1175/JAM2462.1
   Crichton D., 1999, Nat Disaster Manag, P102
   Cui Y, 2024, ENVIRON TECHNOL INNO, V34, DOI 10.1016/j.eti.2024.103568
   Dong WH, 2014, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V6, P7334, DOI 10.3390/su6107334
   Ellena M, 2020, URBAN CLIM, V34, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100676
   Freychet N, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac71b9
   Gu W., 2023, Human Settl West China, V38, P8, DOI [10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20230610, DOI 10.13791/J.CNKI.HSFWEST.20230610]
   Gunawardena KR, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V584, P1040, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.158
   Hao ZC, 2022, ISCIENCE, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104689
   He BJ, 2022, ENERG BUILDINGS, V271, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112306
   He BJ, 2022, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112350
   He BJ, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103361
   Hu KJ, 2017, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V51, P1498, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b04355
   Huber V, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5dee
   ILO (International Labour Organization), 2019, Working on a warmer planet: the effect of heat stress on productivity and decent work
   IPCC, 2014, Intergovernmental panel on climate change, P65, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781139177245.005, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139177245.005]
   Jedlovec G, 2017, RESULTS PHYS, V7, P4294, DOI 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.10.056
   Jones B, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V146, P423, DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-2133-7
   JONES TS, 1982, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V247, P3327, DOI 10.1001/jama.247.24.3327
   Lee YJ, 2014, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V44, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.08.002
   LiangLiang T, 2016, 2016 7 IEEE INT C SO, P26
   Liu C, 2016, BUILD ENVIRON, V105, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.028
   Liu MX, 2023, IEEE J-STARS, V16, P3148, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2023.3260467
   Liu X, 2020, COMPLEXITY, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/9717658
   Loughnan ME, 2014, INT J EMERG SERV, V3, P6, DOI 10.1108/IJES-10-2012-0044
   Maitiniyazi M., 2015, Ecol Environ Sci, V24, P7, DOI [10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2015.11.01, DOI 10.16258/J.CNKI.1674-5906.2015.11.01]
   Mangus CW, 2019, PEDIATR REV, V40, P97, DOI 10.1542/pir.2017-0322
   Manoli G, 2019, NATURE, V573, P55, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1512-9
   Martín Y, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V310, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114773
   May P.J., 1989, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, V7, P281, DOI [10.1177/028072708900700307, DOI 10.1177/028072708900700307]
   Medina-Ramón M, 2006, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V114, P1331, DOI 10.1289/ehp.9074
   Moreira LL, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13010098
   Nastran M, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V37, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.008
   O'Lenick CR, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V660, P715, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.002
   OBrien Talip MHX, 2018, China Economic and Trade Herald, P4
   Peduzzi P, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11040957
   Prtner H.O, 2022, Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, P3056, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844]
   Qi JD, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.12.020
   Reid CE, 2009, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V117, P1730, DOI 10.1289/ehp.0900683
   Riddell GA, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101437
   Rohat G, 2019, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V172, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2018.09.013
   Runkle JD, 2019, ENVIRON INT, V129, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.026
   Sandholz S, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100857
   Shan ZR, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19010183
   Shi DC, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102065
   Shi H, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10080867
   Shickman K, 2020, ENERG EFFIC, V13, P407, DOI 10.1007/s12053-019-09789-9
   Stabler Linda B., 2005, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V3, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2004.11.001
   Stone B, 2010, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V118, P1425, DOI 10.1289/ehp.0901879
   Sugg MM, 2018, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V62, P1521, DOI 10.1007/s00484-018-1553-z
   Szagri D, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101711
   Thanvisitthpon N, 2023, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V20, DOI 10.3390/ijerph20021172
   Tomlinson CJ, 2011, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V10, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-10-42
   UN, 2021, Beating the heat: A Sustainable Cooling Handbook for Cities
   UN HANDBOOK OF STATISTICS, 2023, About us
   Venugopal V, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac1469
   Voogt JA, 2003, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V86, P370, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00079-8
   Wang SQ, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107176
   [Wen Xumin 温旭敏], 2023, [Journal of Resources and Ecology, 资源与生态学报], V14, P399
   Wilhelmi OV, 2010, ENVIRON RES LETT, V5, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014021
   WMO, 2023, Heatwave
   Wolf T, 2013, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V1, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2013.07.004
   Wong NH, 2005, HABITAT INT, V29, P547, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2004.04.008
   [武夕琳 Wu Xilin], 2019, [地球信息科学学报, Journal of Geo-Information Science], V21, P1029
   Xia Y, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V171, P811, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.069
   Xu RB, 2020, PLOS MED, V17, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003369
   [徐永明 Xu Yongming], 2013, [生态环境学报, Ecology and Environmental Sciences], V22, P639
   Yang Y, 2022, Spatial and temporal characteristics of heat wave disasters in mountainous cities and risk assessment: the case of Chongqing City Chongqing University
   Yardley J, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P670, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.010
   Zemtsov S, 2020, HEALTH PLACE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102429
   Zennaro F, 2021, EARTH-SCI REV, V220, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103752
   Zhang GW, 2023, NPJ CLIM ATMOS SCI, V6, DOI 10.1038/s41612-023-00404-4
   Zhang W, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V663, P852, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.240
   Zhao L, 2014, NATURE, V511, P216, DOI 10.1038/nature13462
   [赵志欣 Zhao Zhixin], 2022, [干旱区地理, Arid Land Geography], V45, P512
   Zheng MX, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17186584
   Zhu Q, 2014, GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, V7, DOI 10.3402/gha.v7.25051
NR 86
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 5
U2 5
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 1735-1472
EI 1735-2630
J9 INT J ENVIRON SCI TE
JI Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.
PD 2024 NOV 27
PY 2024
DI 10.1007/s13762-024-06195-2
EA NOV 2024
PG 20
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA N5Y1I
UT WOS:001365081700001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Szcodronski, KE
   Wade, AA
   Burton, SE
   Hossack, BR
AF Szcodronski, Kimberly E.
   Wade, Alisa A.
   Burton, Sarah E.
   Hossack, Blake R.
TI Incorporating projected climate conditions to map future riparian
   refugia
SO CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; climate refugia; connectivity; drought; landscape
   diversity; management; resilience; restoration; stream; warming
ID CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEMS; CORRIDORS; MICROREFUGIA; BIODIVERSITY;
   VARIABILITY; RESILIENCE; VEGETATION; RESPONSES; ECOLOGY
AB Identifying areas expected to remain buffered from climate change and maintain biodiversity and ecological function (i.e., climate refugia) is important for climate adaptation planning. As structurally diverse transitional zones between terrestrial and aquatic environments, riparian areas are often biological hotspots and provide critical corridors for species movement, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. In our study region in the western and central USA, identifying riparian areas that could serve as climate refugia is a priority for wildlife managers. We mapped areas with connected riparian habitats that, based on landscape diversity and projected changes in summer temperatures and landscape runoff, are expected to serve as climate refugia. To incorporate uncertainty and balance the need for near- and long-term planning, we mapped potential refugia for 2 future time periods (2040-2069, 2070-2099) based on 2 climate models that represented divergent but plausible climate outcomes. The approach we developed is not constrained by physiology or behavior of target species and can be used to identify areas expected to fare comparatively well under a wide range of future climate scenarios. Our approach can also be used to identify areas where restoration could increase riparian connectedness and climate resilience.
   Identifying areas expected to remain buffered from climate change (climate refugia) is important for adaptation planning. As structurally diverse zones between terrestrial and aquatic environments, riparian areas are critical for maintaining biological diversity. We identified riparian areas in the western USA expected to serve as climate refugia under a wide range of climate scenarios. Our approach is not constrained by physiology or behavior of target species and can help identify areas where restoration could increase riparian connectedness and climate resilience. image
C1 [Szcodronski, Kimberly E.; Hossack, Blake R.] US Geol Survey, Northern Rocky Mt Sci Ctr, Missoula, MT 59812 USA.
   [Szcodronski, Kimberly E.] Montana Fish Wildlife & Pk, Missoula, MT USA.
   [Wade, Alisa A.] US Geol Survey, North Cent Climate Adaptat Sci Ctr, Boulder, CO USA.
   [Wade, Alisa A.] US Dept Interior, Off Policy Anal, Missoula, MT USA.
   [Burton, Sarah E.] US Geol Survey, Natl Climate Adaptat Sci Ctr, Arvada, CO USA.
   [Hossack, Blake R.] Univ Montana, WA Franke Coll Forestry & Conservat, Wildlife Biol Program, Missoula, MT USA.
C3 United States Department of the Interior; United States Geological
   Survey; United States Department of the Interior; United States
   Geological Survey; United States Department of the Interior; United
   States Department of the Interior; United States Geological Survey;
   University of Montana System; University of Montana
RP Hossack, BR (corresponding author), US Geol Survey, Northern Rocky Mt Sci Ctr, Missoula, MT 59812 USA.
EM blake_hossack@usgs.gov
OI /0000-0003-3976-2224
FU U.S. Geological Survey North Central Climate Adaptation Science Center
FX U.S. Geological Survey North Central Climate Adaptation Science Center
CR Abatzoglou JT, 2013, INT J CLIMATOL, V33, P121, DOI 10.1002/joc.3413
   Abatzoglou JT, 2012, INT J CLIMATOL, V32, P772, DOI 10.1002/joc.2312
   Ackerly DD, 2020, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V18, P288, DOI 10.1002/fee.2204
   AFWA, 2012, BEST PRACTICES STATE
   Allen CD, 2015, ECOSPHERE, V6, DOI 10.1890/ES15-00203.1
   Anderson M., 2018, Resilient sites for terrestrial conservation in the Great Lakes and tallgrass prairie
   Anderson M. G., 2019, RESILIENT SITES CONN
   Anderson MG, 2014, CONSERV BIOL, V28, P959, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12272
   [Anonymous], 2020, Existing Vegetation Type Layer
   Ashcroft MB, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P1866, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02661.x
   Beier Paul, 2012, Ecological Restoration, V30, P312, DOI 10.3368/er.30.4.312
   Briggs MK, 1998, WETLANDS, V18, P513, DOI 10.1007/BF03161669
   Brost BM, 2012, ECOL APPL, V22, P87, DOI 10.1890/11-0213.1
   Buttrick S., 2015, CONSERVING NATURES S
   Capon SJ, 2013, ECOSYSTEMS, V16, P359, DOI 10.1007/s10021-013-9656-1
   Cooper DJ, 1999, REGUL RIVER, V15, P419, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199909/10)15:5<419::AID-RRR555>3.0.CO;2-Y
   Dobrowski SZ, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P1022, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02263.x
   Dodds WK, 2004, BIOSCIENCE, V54, P205, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0205:LOTETE]2.0.CO;2
   Ellis J. H., 2008, REPORT MONTANA DEP E
   Fremier AK, 2015, BIOL CONSERV, V191, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.029
   Germain SJ, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V163, P579, DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02868-2
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Hilty JA, 2004, CONSERV BIOL, V18, P126, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00225.x
   Hostetler SW, 2016, WATER RESOUR RES, V52, P9600, DOI 10.1002/2016WR018665
   Johnson W.C., 1999, Great Plains Research: A Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, V9, P357
   Jones KB, 2010, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V25, P1261, DOI 10.1007/s10980-010-9510-1
   Keppel G, 2012, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V21, P393, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00686.x
   KNOPF FL, 1988, WILSON BULL, V100, P272
   Krosby M, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0205156
   Levine R, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-44381-2
   Maclean IMD, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P256, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13343
   Manning A, 2020, J ARID ENVIRON, V178, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104167
   McCabe GJ, 2008, J HYDROMETEOROL, V9, P816, DOI 10.1175/2008JHM943.1
   McCabe GJ, 2011, WATER RESOUR RES, V47, DOI 10.1029/2011WR010630
   Miller MP, 2018, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V54, P1258, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12685
   Morelli TL, 2020, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V18, P228, DOI 10.1002/fee.2189
   Naiman RJ, 1997, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V28, P621, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621
   NAIMAN RJ, 1993, ECOL APPL, V3, P209, DOI 10.2307/1941822
   Omernik JM, 2014, ENVIRON MANAGE, V54, P1249, DOI 10.1007/s00267-014-0364-1
   Patten DT, 1998, WETLANDS, V18, P498, DOI 10.1007/BF03161668
   Rangwala I, 2021, CLIMATE, V9, DOI 10.3390/cli9120177
   Ray AM, 2016, ECOSPHERE, V7, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1409
   Riitters K, 2019, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V34, P2057, DOI 10.1007/s10980-018-0755-4
   Rouget M, 2003, DIVERS DISTRIB, V9, P191, DOI 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00025.x
   Rull V, 2009, J BIOGEOGR, V36, P481, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.02023.x
   Sabo JL, 2005, ECOLOGY, V86, P56, DOI 10.1890/04-0668
   Schile LM, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0088760
   Schloss CA, 2022, ECOL APPL, V32, DOI 10.1002/eap.2468
   Schook DM, 2022, ECOHYDROLOGY, V15, DOI 10.1002/eco.2408
   Schwalm CR, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P19656, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2007117117
   Seavy N. E., 2009, Ecological Restoration, V27, P330, DOI 10.3368/er.27.3.330
   Sepulchre P, 2020, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V13, P3011, DOI 10.5194/gmd-13-3011-2020
   Stromberg JC, 1996, ECOL APPL, V6, P113, DOI 10.2307/2269558
   Stromberg JC, 2017, J ARID ENVIRON, V138, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.12.004
   Szcodronski K. E., 2024, RIPARIAN CLIMATE REF, DOI [10.5066/P96WZLMS, DOI 10.5066/P96WZLMS]
   Szcodronski K. E., 2022, INTEGRATING CLIMATEI, DOI [10.21429/a2et-te45, DOI 10.21429/A2ET-TE45]
   Tercek MT, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0256586
   Theis S, 2023, CONSERV SCI PRACT, V5, DOI 10.1111/csp2.12856
   Theobald DM., 2013, Detailed datasets on riparian and valley- - - bottom attributes and condition for the Great Northern and Northern Pacific:1-19
   Vincent CH., 2020, Federal Land Ownership: Overview and Data
   Voldoire A, 2013, CLIM DYNAM, V40, P2091, DOI 10.1007/s00382-011-1259-y
   Williamson J, 2021, J APPL ECOL, V58, P431, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.13784
   Wolock DM, 1999, CLIM RES, V11, P149, DOI 10.3354/cr011149
   Wood SLR, 2022, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2022.830822
   Yang J, 2011, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V26, P381, DOI 10.1007/s10980-010-9565-z
NR 65
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 13
U2 13
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
EI 2578-4854
J9 CONSERV SCI PRACT
JI Conserv. Sci. Pract.
PD AUG
PY 2024
VL 6
IS 8
DI 10.1111/csp2.13183
EA JUL 2024
PG 14
WC Biodiversity Conservation
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation
GA C5S1E
UT WOS:001278705600001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Nilubon, P
   Laeni, N
AF Nilubon, Polpat
   Laeni, Naim
TI Re-thinking new possibilities for urban climate resilience planning in
   Bangkok: Introducing adaptation pathways through a multidisciplinary
   design workshop
SO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Flood adaptation; Design workshop; Adaptation pathways; Urban
   development; Integrated approach; Bangkok; Design process
ID FLOOD MANAGEMENT; REAL OPTIONS; RISK; POLICY; UNCERTAINTY; ENVIRONMENT;
   CHALLENGES; BARRIERS
AB In many cities in developing countries, the design and implementation of flood adaptation measures face planning challenges, they are often underdeveloped in practice. This paper aims to investigate the potential for urban flood adaptation solutions and design in practice within the context of a climate-vulnerable Southeast Asian city. We specifically explore the "design workshop" - an essential process providing valuable experience and conditions for effective climate adaptation in Bangkok. As part of our research, the workshop was organized to introduce and experiment the implication of adaptation pathway approach with designers, urban planners, and decision-makers. Findings reveal that the design workshop provided a collaborative environment, offers transformative space for formulating integrated and context-specific flood adaptation solutions - new possibilities for urban climate resilience in the making. The application of the adaptation pathways facilitates a concrete, quantifiable, and time-bound design process for identifying and sequencing potential flood adaptation measures in Bangkok. Consequently, this paper concludes that multidisciplinary and collaborative processes, along with the introduction of adaptation pathways, stimulating urban flood adaptation planning and implementation in a more collaborative and participative way. However, it is important to note that the feasibility assessment of the proposed solutions still requires essential conditions such as policy synchronization, technical skills, and local resources. To effectively realize these strategies in real-world urban planning practice, this research suggests that local governments should consider implementing a multidisciplinary design process in urban development and flood risk management.
C1 [Nilubon, Polpat] Rajamangala Univ Technol Thanyaburi, Fac Architecture, 39 Moo 1,Rangsit Nakorn Nayok Rd, Klongluang 12110, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
   [Laeni, Naim] Thammasat Univ, Fac Polit Sci, 2 Prachan Rd, Phra Nakorn 10200, Bangkok, Thailand.
C3 Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi; Thammasat University
RP Nilubon, P (corresponding author), Rajamangala Univ Technol Thanyaburi, Fac Architecture, 39 Moo 1,Rangsit Nakorn Nayok Rd, Klongluang 12110, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
EM polpat_n@rmutt.ac.th
RI Laeni, Naim/GQI-0621-2022
OI Laeni, Naim/0000-0003-1683-589X
FU Embassy of the Netherlands [BKKDW2022]; IHE Delft, and Shma Company
   Limited
FX We would like to express our utmost gratitude to the organizers and
   partners of Bangkok Design Week 2022 (BKKDW2022) , the Embassy of the
   Netherlands, IHE Delft, and Shma Company Limited for their generous
   financial sponsorship and invaluable support in facilitating the
   workshop. We would also like to extend special thanks to all the keynote
   speakers and workshop participants involved in the Bangkok climate
   adaptation initiative for their valuable contributions. Additionally, we
   are deeply thankful to the Association of Landscape Architects
   (Thailand) for their kind comments and recommendations.
CR Alexander M, 2018, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V18, P397, DOI 10.1007/s10113-017-1195-4
   Anderson H.C, 2014, Amphibious Architecture: Living with a Rising Bay
   Asian Development Bank, 2017, A Region at Risk: the Human Dimensions of Climate Change in Asia and the Pacific, DOI [10.22617/TCS178839-2, DOI 10.22617/TCS178839-2]
   Badura T, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V215, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104215
   Bank World, 2012, Thai Flood 2011: Rapid Assessment for Resilient Recovery and Reconstruction Planning
   Bloemen P, 2018, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V23, P1083, DOI 10.1007/s11027-017-9773-9
   Bulkeley H, 2001, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V11, P155, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00064-9
   Buurman J, 2016, POLICY SOC, V35, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.05.002
   Byg A, 2016, GEOJOURNAL, V81, P169, DOI 10.1007/s10708-014-9611-5
   Davoudi S, 2012, Planning Theory
   Driessen PPJ, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10111595
   Evans G, 2015, Sustainable Mediterranean Construction
   Fekete A, 2018, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-68606-6
   Friend R, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V7, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.08.001
   Gersonius B, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, pS201, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-2015-0
   Gersonius B, 2015, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V8, P135, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12083
   Gersonius B., 2012, The resilience approach to climate adaption applied for flood risk
   Gersonius B, 2013, Sensitive Urban
   Haasnoot M, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P485, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006
   Haasnoot M, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V115, P795, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0444-2
   Handayani W, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101073
   Heitz C, 2009, LAND USE POLICY, V26, P443, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.05.008
   Huq S, 2004, CLIM POLICY, V4, P25
   Kempenaar A, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V149, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.002
   Kwadijk JCJ, 2010, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V1, P729, DOI 10.1002/wcc.64
   Laeni N, 2019, CITIES, V90, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.02.002
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Mabon L, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V187, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.03.013
   Marks D, 2015, PAC AFF, V88, P623, DOI 10.5509/2015883623
   Masoud F, 2014, Integrated Water-Management: Landscape Infrastructure & Urban Morphology in the Jordan River Watershed
   [Masson-Delmotte V. IPCC IPCC], 2021, Summary for Policy Makers
   Matthews T, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V138, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.010
   McClure L, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V173, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.01.012
   Meyer V, 2018, FUTURE CITY, V10, P363, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-59324-1_20
   Nillesen Anne Loes, 2021, Cities Research Series, P133, DOI [10.1007/978-981-15-8748-1_6, DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-8748-1_6]
   Nilubon P, 2016, PROCD SOC BEHV, V216, P470, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.063
   Nilubon Polpat, 2019, International Journal of Water Resources Engineering, P50
   Patil D.D., 2010, Int. J. Control Autom., V11, P975, DOI DOI 10.5120/1554-2074
   Perry J, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V133, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.013
   Prothi A, 2023, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V8, P3, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2022.2148951
   QUINLAN JR, 1987, INT J MAN MACH STUD, V27, P221, DOI 10.1016/S0020-7373(87)80053-6
   Radhakrishnan M, 2018, CITIES, V78, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.01.022
   Radhakrishnan M, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9020129
   Ren ZE, 2011, BUILD ENVIRON, V46, P2398, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.05.022
   Revi A, 2008, ENVIRON URBAN, V20, P207, DOI 10.1177/0956247808089157
   Rosenzweig BR, 2018, WIRES WATER, V5, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1302
   Rossi B, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V51, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.017
   Saito N, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V9, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2014.07.006
   Schipper E., 2007, Climate change adaptation and development: Exploring the linkages
   Smit B, 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P877
   Sörensen J, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8080332
   Stumpe J, 2000, Aan de Staatsecretaris van Verkeer En
   Thaitakoo D, 2010, COMM ENV DISAST RISK, V2, P35, DOI 10.1108/S2040-7262(2010)0000002006
   Van der Pol J, 2011, Climate of Coastal Cooperation
   Wiering M, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V44, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.02.006
   Wise RM, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002
   Woodward M, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P75, DOI 10.1111/risa.12088
   Yokohari M, 2000, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V47, P159, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00084-5
   Zevenbergen C, 2008, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V1, P81, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2008.00010.x
   Zevenbergen C, 2010, Urban Flood Manag
   Zheng HW, 2014, HABITAT INT, V41, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.08.006
NR 61
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 6
U2 7
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 1462-9011
EI 1873-6416
J9 ENVIRON SCI POLICY
JI Environ. Sci. Policy
PD APR
PY 2024
VL 154
AR 103711
DI 10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103711
EA FEB 2024
PG 13
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA OB1A2
UT WOS:001204696200001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Townhill, B
   Harrod, O
   Painting, S
   Acheampong, E
   Bell, J
   Nyarko, BK
   Engelhard, G
AF Townhill, Bryony
   Harrod, Olivia
   Painting, Suzanne
   Acheampong, Emmanuel
   Bell, James
   Nyarko, Benjamin Kofi
   Engelhard, Georg
TI Climate change risk and adaptation for fisher communities in Ghana
SO JOURNAL OF COASTAL CONSERVATION
LA English
DT Article
DE West Africa; Vulnerability; Resilience; Climate action; Artisanal
ID WEST-AFRICAN FISHERIES; SOUTHERN BENGUELA; CHANGE IMPACTS; INDICATORS;
   MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM; FOOD; OCEAN
AB Artisanal fisheries in Ghana account for more than two-thirds of the country's food fish production and employ or support up to 2 million people. However, many fish stocks are close to collapse through overexploitation, especially stocks such as sardinella that are a staple food for Ghanaians. Climate change is expected to affect the fish themselves as well as fishing activities, increasing the already high risk to fishers' livelihoods and Ghana's food security. Here, we use a climate change risk assessment framework to assess vulnerability of Ghanaian fisheries, considering climate hazards, fish species sensitivity and socio-economic vulnerability of different fisheries sectors and regions. The results show that some of the species that constitute the highest catches in Ghana are highly sensitive to climate change, such as snappers, Congo dentex and groupers. Some species assessed as having low sensitivity to climate change in the region are migratory pelagic fish, including tuna. Species caught by artisanal fleets are typically more sensitive than those captured by semi-industrial and industrial fleets. Regionally, the highest climate risk is found for Volta in the east, and the lowest for the Greater Accra region, along the central part of the coastline. This information can be used to identify, with stakeholders, the climate adaptation actions that are most suitable for the different regions and fisheries sectors. Actions can be tailored to the different aspects of climate risk, helping the country to achieve its aims of restoring fish stocks, safeguarding livelihoods and improving climate resilience for Ghana's artisanal fishers.
C1 [Townhill, Bryony; Harrod, Olivia; Painting, Suzanne; Bell, James; Engelhard, Georg] Ctr Environm Fisheries & Aquaculture Sci Cefas, Int Marine Climate Change Ctr iMC3, Pakefield Rd, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, England.
   [Acheampong, Emmanuel; Nyarko, Benjamin Kofi] Univ Cape Coast, Dept Geog & Reg Planning, Cape Coast, Ghana.
C3 Centre for Environment Fisheries & Aquaculture Science; University of
   Cape Coast
RP Townhill, B (corresponding author), Ctr Environm Fisheries & Aquaculture Sci Cefas, Int Marine Climate Change Ctr iMC3, Pakefield Rd, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, England.
EM bryony.townhill@cefas.gov.uk
RI Nyarko, Benjamin/I-2155-2019; Harrod, Olivia/LJM-4586-2024
OI Acheampong, Emmanuel/0000-0001-6243-294X; Townhill,
   Bryony/0000-0003-1906-1885; Nyarko, Benjamin Kofi/0000-0002-6560-9613
FU This work was produced under the One Ocean Hub project, funded by UK
   Research and Innovation (UKRI) through the Global Challenges Research
   Fund (GCRF).; UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) through the Global
   Challenges Research Fund (GCRF); NERC [NE/S008950/1] Funding Source:
   UKRI
FX This work was produced under the One Ocean Hub project, funded by UK
   Research and Innovation (UKRI) through the Global Challenges Research
   Fund (GCRF).
CR Aheto DW, 2016, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V127, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.04.006
   Allison E. H., 2005, Rural livelihoods and poverty reduction policies, P256
   Alves B, 2020, J COAST CONSERV, V24, DOI 10.1007/s11852-020-00755-7
   Anning A, 2012, J Econ Sustain Dev, V3
   [Anonymous], 2021, FishStatJ-Software for Fishery and Aquaculture Statistical Time Series
   [Anonymous], 2018, Global Aquaculture Production
   [Anonymous], 2015, Fisheries Management Plan
   Asiedu B., 2013, INT J FISH AQUAT SCI, V2, P21
   Barange M, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P211, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2119, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2119]
   Belhabib D, 2016, MAR POLICY, V71, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.05.009
   Belhabib D, 2015, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V111, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.04.010
   Belhabib D, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0118351
   Blamey LK, 2015, J MARINE SYST, V144, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.11.006
   Blasiak R, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0179632
   Challinor A, 2014, Climate Change: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. IPCC Working Group II Contribution to AR5
   Cheung WWL, 2013, NATURE, V497, P365, DOI 10.1038/nature12156
   Cheung WWL, 2010, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V16, P24, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01995.x
   Chuku EO, 2019, Promoting oyster culture in Ghana: Strategies for optimising seed collection and growth of C rassostrea tulipa (Lamarck, 1819) in coastal water bodies
   Cinner JE, 2009, CONSERV BIOL, V23, P124, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01041.x
   Cobbina R, 2018, Open Access Master's Theses, V1271
   Cochrane K, 2020, Application of a general methodology to understand vulnerability and adaptability of the small pelagic fisheries in the Benguela countries, P108
   Colburn LL, 2016, MAR POLICY, V74, P323, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.030
   Cook RM, 2021, One Ocean Hub Report, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3956447, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3956447]
   Cook RM, 2021, One Ocean Hub Report, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3964757, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3964757]
   Cook R, 2021, FISH RES, V243, DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106048
   Cury P, 2002, Large Marine Ecosystems Elsevier, V11, P241
   Davies K., 2017, Georgetown Environmental Law Review, V30, P47
   Davies-Vollum KS, 2019, J COAST CONSERV, V23, P293, DOI 10.1007/s11852-018-0658-1
   Donkor SM, 2012, Assessment and impact of developmental activities on the marine environment and the fisheries resources of the Gulf of Guinea, P64
   Dovlo E., 2016, REPORT 2016 GHANA MA
   Effah E, 2023, Challenges in Tropical Coastal Zone Management, P227, DOI [10.1007/978-3-031-17879-5_14, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-17879-5_14]
   Environmental Justice Foundation, 2020, Scoping assessment of sustainable livelihood opportunities in the artisanal fishing communities of the Central Region of Ghana
   Evadzi PIK, 2018, J COAST CONSERV, V22, P183, DOI 10.1007/s11852-017-0569-6
   FAO, 2019, REP FAO CECAF WORK G
   FCWC, 2021, General information about Ghana related to fisheries
   Field CB., 2014, MAN RISKS EXTR EV DI, P1
   Freduah G, 2016, Climate change and fisheries in Ghana: Strategies for building adaptive capacity by small-scale fishers
   Fu CH, 2020, ICES J MAR SCI, V77, P1516, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsz182
   Garcia-Soto C, 2021, FRONT MAR SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2021.642372
   Gardner CJ, 2016, Opportunities for oil and gas corporate social investment in the fisheries sector of Ghana's Western Region: full scoping report
   Ghana Statistical Service, 2018, Poverty Trends in Ghana: 2005-2017
   Hardman-Mountford NJ, 2002, Gulf Guinea Large Mar. Ecosyst, P49
   Hare JA, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0146756
   Heath M, 2013, FP7, Project no: 246 933, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004]
   Hutchings L, 2009, PROG OCEANOGR, V83, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.046
   Izmir Municipality, 2013, IZM MUN HOUS ZON COD
   Jarre A, 2018, J MARINE SYST, V188, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2018.01.004
   Jarre A, 2015, FISH OCEANOGR, V24, P122, DOI 10.1111/fog.12086
   Katikiro RE, 2012, J ENVIRON SCI MANAG, V15, P83
   Koranteng KA., 2002, GULF GUINEA LARGE MA, P93
   Lam VWY, 2012, AFR J MAR SCI, V34, P103, DOI 10.2989/1814232X.2012.673294
   Lazar N., 2018, SCI TECH WORK GROUP
   Lindegren M, 2010, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V277, P2121, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.0353
   Mugambiwa SS, 2017, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V9
   Nunoo FKE, 2014, REV FISH SCI AQUAC, V22, P274, DOI 10.1080/23308249.2014.962687
   Ofori-Danson PK, 2019, Assessment of the Socio-Economic, Food Security and Nutrition Impacts of the 2019 Canoe Fishery Closed Fishing Season in Ghana. USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project
   Okyere I, 2023, MAR POLICY, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105640
   Ortega-Cisneros K, 2018, AFR J MAR SCI, V40, P279, DOI 10.2989/1814232X.2018.1512526
   Ortega-Cisneros K, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V95, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.021
   Ortega-Cisneros K, 2018, FISH OCEANOGR, V27, P489, DOI 10.1111/fog.12268
   Pinnegar JK, 2019, ICES J MAR SCI, V76, P1353, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsz052
   Pinsky ML, 2013, SCIENCE, V341, P1239, DOI 10.1126/science.1239352
   Planque B, 2010, J MARINE SYST, V79, P403, DOI 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.12.018
   Ramos JE, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-08818-5
   Serdeczny O, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P1585, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0910-2
   Shannon L, 2014, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V512, P115, DOI 10.3354/meps10821
   Stark J, 2019, Advancing Reforms to Promote Sustainable Management of Ghan''s Small Pelagic Fisheries, P57
   Strathclyde, 2019, Fisheries Research Strathclyde StrathE2E_Mike Heath
   Sumaila UR, 2010, 5 WORLD BANK
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Townhill BL, 2021, Responding to climate change in Caribbean fisheries and aquaculture through adaptation, P1
   Weatherbase, 2022, Ghana
   World Bank, 2020, GHAN POV ASS
NR 73
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 4
U2 6
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 1400-0350
EI 1874-7841
J9 J COAST CONSERV
JI J. Coast. Conserv.
PD OCT
PY 2023
VL 27
IS 5
AR 45
DI 10.1007/s11852-023-00967-7
PG 20
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Environmental Sciences; Marine & Freshwater
   Biology; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Marine &
   Freshwater Biology; Water Resources
GA R6AV1
UT WOS:001065168400001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Iqbal, KMJ
   Khan, MI
   Mikhaylov, A
   Shah, AA
   Yadykin, V
   Filho, WL
   Tariq, MAUR
   Ullah, W
AF Iqbal, Kanwar Muhammad Javed
   Khan, Muhammad Irfan
   Mikhaylov, Alexey
   Shah, Ashfaq Ahmad
   Yadykin, Vladimir
   Filho, Walter Leal
   Tariq, Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman
   Ullah, Wahid
TI Modeling principles, criteria and indicators to assess water sector
   governance for climate compatibility and sustainability
SO FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE SDG-13; climate compatible development; climate governance principles;
   CCD criteria; governance indices; MCDA
ID MANAGEMENT; POLICY; FRAMEWORK; FISHERIES
AB The United Nations SDGs Report 2020 revealed that climatic variability victimized masses across the globe in 2018 and the global average temperature would rise to 3.2? during this century. The GHG emission reduction targets for 2030 were prioritized under the Paris Climate Agreement (PCA) of 2015 to keep the rise in global temperature below 1.5?. Here, parallel action for climate adaptation is on top of it. However, targets for both adaptation and mitigation are lagging. Climatic variations will continue more likely with similar trends thus influencing the development needs vis-a-vis environmental security and sustainability of resources. It entails climate compatibility, particularly for the water security agenda for SDG-13 and Paris Climate Agreement (PCA), which requires an inclusive governance regime and ownership for national and sub-national scenarios. In this context, this paper aimed to assess existing water sector governance for climate compatible development (CCD) by taking the case of Pakistan which is among the top 10 countries vulnerable to climate change. Considering the limitations of available methodologies due to the involvement of various aspects and concepts of governance, an integrated multivariate mix-method model was formulated by combining rules and rights-oriented approaches. This MCDA-based model integrates six novel climate governance principles against six basic components of the basic institutional governance framework; Simple Multi-attribute Rating Technique (SMART) with a set of sectoral indicators of 09 criteria of climate compatible development (CCD). It proved well for this water sector case study with cross-sectional data from 340 key informant interviews (KIIs) and 17 focus group discussions (FGDs) in Pakistan, validated statistically. It can be used for periodic sectoral governance assessments for CCD.
C1 [Iqbal, Kanwar Muhammad Javed] Bahria Univ, Natl Inst Maritime Affairs NIMA, Islamabad, Pakistan.
   [Khan, Muhammad Irfan] Int Islamic Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Islamabad, Pakistan.
   [Mikhaylov, Alexey] Financial Univ Govt Russian Federat, Financial Markets & Financial Engn Dept, Moscow, Russia.
   [Shah, Ashfaq Ahmad] Hohai Univ, Res Ctr Environm & Soc, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
   [Yadykin, Vladimir] Peter Great St Petersburg Polytech Univ, Natl Technol Initiat Ctr, Econ & Trade, St Petersburg, Russia.
   [Filho, Walter Leal] Hsch Angew Wissensch Hamburg Fak Life Sci, Hamburg, Germany.
   [Tariq, Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman] Charles Darwin Univ, Coll Engn IT & Environm, Darwin, NT, Australia.
   [Ullah, Wahid] Tokyo Metropolitan Univ, Fac Urban Environm Sci, Dept Tourism Sci, Hachioji, Japan.
C3 International Islamic University, Pakistan; Financial University Under
   the Government of Russian Federation; Hohai University; Peter the Great
   St. Petersburg Polytechnic University; Charles Darwin University; Tokyo
   Metropolitan University
RP Iqbal, KMJ (corresponding author), Bahria Univ, Natl Inst Maritime Affairs NIMA, Islamabad, Pakistan.; Tariq, MAUR (corresponding author), Charles Darwin Univ, Coll Engn IT & Environm, Darwin, NT, Australia.
EM kanwar.javediqbal@gmail.com; atiq.tariq@yahoo.com
RI Yadykin, Vladimir/V-9152-2018; Leal, Walter/ACX-9082-2022; Khan, Muhamad
   Irfan/KRQ-7337-2024; Tariq, Muhammad/ABG-4263-2020; Ullah,
   Wahid/O-3782-2018; Iqbal, Kanwar Muhammad Javed/AEE-1063-2022;
   Mikhaylov, Alexey/A-7964-2015; , SHAH ASHFAQ AHMAD, PHD/J-2476-2019
OI Leal Filho, Walter/0000-0002-1241-5225; Iqbal, Kanwar Muhammad
   Javed/0000-0003-2868-0450; Mikhaylov, Alexey/0000-0003-2478-0307; , SHAH
   ASHFAQ AHMAD, PHD/0000-0001-9142-2441
FU Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
   [075-15-2021-1333]
FX The research is funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education
   of the Russian Federation under the strategic academic leadership
   program "Priority 2030" (Agreement 075-15-2021-1333 dated 30.09.2021).
CR Ali I., 2017, ABASYN J SOC SCI, V10, P232
   Amer M, 2011, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V15, P420, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2011.09.001
   Anderson P., 2014, REFRAMING ADDICTIONS
   [Anonymous], 2020, The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020 p, P68
   [Anonymous], 2013, FRAM IMPL CLIM CHANG
   [Anonymous], 2018, Tracking Adaptation in Agricultural Sectors: Climate Change Adaptation Indicators, DOI DOI 10.18356/87FE25DE-EN
   [Anonymous], 1983, Sociological Theory, DOI [10.2307/202050, DOI 10.2307/202050]
   Atif SB, 2018, APPL ECOL ENV RES, V16, P4265, DOI 10.15666/aeer/1604_42654287
   Aven T, 2018, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V176, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.018
   Bilal H., 2018, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V37, P19, DOI [10.3923/std.2018.19.27, DOI 10.3923/STD.2018.19.27]
   Blanchard JL, 2017, NAT ECOL EVOL, V1, P1240, DOI 10.1038/s41559-017-0258-8
   Blechinger PFH, 2011, ENERG POLICY, V39, P6331, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.034
   Blunden J., 2019, B AM METEOROL SOC, V100, pSi, DOI DOI 10.1175/2019BAMSSTATEOFTHECLIMATE.1
   Borgatti SP, 2009, SCIENCE, V323, P892, DOI 10.1126/science.1165821
   Campbell BM, 2014, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V8, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.002
   Carvalho A, 2009, ENVIRON COMMUN, V3, P131, DOI 10.1080/17524030902935434
   Christiansen T, 2003, INFORMAL GOVERNANCE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION, P1
   Chuku CA, 2010, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V15, P41, DOI 10.1007/s11027-009-9203-8
   Daim T, 2009, TECHNOL SOC, V31, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.03.009
   Dasgupta S., 2011, Good agricultural governance
   Dey PK, 2012, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V23, P903, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2011.586379
   Dong Y, 2017, PROC CIRP, V61, P697, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.173
   Douxchamps Sabine, 2017, World Development Perspectives, V5, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.wdp.2017.02.001
   EDWARDS W, 1977, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V7, P326, DOI 10.1109/TSMC.1977.4309720
   Eleftheriadis I, 2017, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V9, P626, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-09-2016-0145
   Emenanjo I., 2015, DEV INDICATORS CLIMA
   Gärtner S, 2008, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V256, P1666, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.053
   GOP, 2018, NAT WAT POL
   GoP, 2017, NAT SUST DEV STRAT P
   GoP, 2018, PAK WAT POL
   Government of Pakistan (GoP), 2020, Pakistan Economic Survey 201920
   Government of Punjab, 2018, PUNJ WAT POL
   Government of Punjab, 2017, PUNJ CLIM CHANG POL
   Government of Punjab, 2019, PUNJ WAT ACT
   Ha TP, 2018, J HYDROL, V557, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.024
   Hassan M., 2021, ENERGY ENV SECURITY, P147
   Hassan M, 2018, ENERG ENVIRON-UK, V29, P184, DOI 10.1177/0958305X17743036
   Hovland I., 2005, Successful Communication: A Toolkit for Researchers and Civil Society Organisations
   IPCC, 2018, GLOB WARM 1 5C SUMM
   Iqbal A., 2021, Ilm al Iqtad
   Iqbal K.M.J., 2018, POLICY PERSPECT, V15, P139, DOI [10.13169/polipers.15.3.0139, DOI 10.13169/POLIPERS.15.3.0139]
   Iqbal K. M. J., 2021, INT J MOD AGRIC, V10, P1120
   Iqbal K.M.J., 2021, ACAD STRATEG MANAG J, V20, P1
   Iqbal K.M.J., 2020, POLARIS J MARIT RES, V3, P21, DOI [10.53963/pjmr.2020.002.2, DOI 10.53963/PJMR.2020.002.2]
   Iqbal KMJ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-19399-1
   Ishtiaque A, 2019, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V171, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.01.020
   Jiang JN, 2017, CHIN J POPUL RESOUR, V15, P21, DOI 10.1080/10042857.2017.1286145
   Kartodihardjo H., 2013, PARTICIPATORY GOVERN
   Kleine M, 2014, J EUR PUBLIC POLICY, V21, P303, DOI 10.1080/13501763.2013.870023
   Leskinen P, 2005, J OPER RES SOC, V56, P855, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601925
   Lockwood M, 2010, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V23, P986, DOI 10.1080/08941920802178214
   McIntosh R.D., 2020, ENVIRON SYST DECIS, V40, P356, DOI [DOI 10.1007/s10669-020-09767-y, 10.1007/s10669-020-09767-y]
   Mitchell T., 2010, CDKN ODI Policy Brief
   Nakano R, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V198, P570, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.112
   Norris RH, 2012, FRESHW SCI, V31, P5, DOI 10.1899/11-027.1
   Oliveira E, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V76, P623, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.042
   Peters BG, 2020, GOVERNANCE, V33, P585, DOI 10.1111/gove.12455
   Pyone T, 2017, HEALTH POLICY PLANN, V32, P710, DOI 10.1093/heapol/czx007
   Rahman A, 2013, CEECC WORK
   Roberts J., 2014, TRANSBOUNDARY WATER
   Ruhanen L, 2010, TOUR REV, V65, P4, DOI 10.1108/16605371011093836
   Saunders J., 2010, BACKGROUND PAPER ONE
   Serrat Olivier, 2017, Knowledge Solutions, P307, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_32, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0983-932]
   Gomes CFS, 2017, J MODEL MANAG, V12, P475, DOI 10.1108/JM2-01-2016-0005
   Sridharan V., 2018, P SCI FOR 2018 STELL, P1
   Stone R.W., 2011, Controlling institutions: International organizations and the global economy
   Teh LCL, 2013, FISH FISH, V14, P77, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00450.x
   Thiault L, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aaw9976
   Thornton PK, 2018, AGR SYST, V167, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.09.009
   UNFCCC, 2015, FCCCCP2015L9REV1
   United Nations, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203
   Visseren-Hamakers IJ, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P408, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.003
   Waheed A, 2021, ENVIRON MANAGE, V67, P793, DOI 10.1007/s00267-021-01449-y
   Wise RM, 2016, CLIM RISK MANAG, V12, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2015.11.001
   WMO, 2020, WMO Statement on the state of the global climate in 2019
   Wood BT, 2017, ENVIRON MANAGE, V60, P436, DOI 10.1007/s00267-017-0890-8
   Ysa T., 2014, REFRAMING ADDICTIONS
NR 77
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 1
U2 6
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-665X
J9 FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ
JI Front. Environ. Sci.
PD FEB 15
PY 2023
VL 11
AR 989930
DI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.989930
PG 16
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 9L2DP
UT WOS:000941365600001
OA Green Accepted, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Díaz-Chuquizuta, P
   Hidalgo-Melendez, E
   Mendoza-Paredes, M
   Cieza-Ruiz, I
   Jara-Calvo, TW
   Valdés-Rodríguez, OA
AF Diaz-Chuquizuta, Percy
   Hidalgo-Melendez, Edison
   Mendoza-Paredes, Melbin
   Cieza-Ruiz, Isaac
   Jara-Calvo, Teofilo Wladimir
   Valdes-Rodriguez, Ofelia Andrea
TI New thilinear hybrid of hard yellow corn for the Peruvian tropic
SO AGRONOMIA MESOAMERICANA
LA English
DT Article
DE Zea mays; evaluation; yield; genotype-environment
ID YIELD STABILITY; L.; LINES; CROP
AB Introduction. Hard yellow corn (Zea mays L.) is the main source for food processing; therefore, it is necessary to generate hybrids with yields higher than 2.8 t ha-1 and climatic adaptability. Objective. To evaluate and compare the agronomic behavior of five experimental trilinear hybrids of hard yellow corn maize and the Marginal 28T variety in eight tropical Peruvian locations. Materials and methods. The experiment took place in two phases: from March 2018 to March 2019 in four validation plots in San Martin, and from March to December 2019 in four adaptabilities plots in San Martin, Pucallpa, Loreto, and Amazonas. The evaluated variables were: plant and ear height, size and weight of ear, roots lodging, rust resistance, and yield (t ha-1). A randomized complete block design was applied, with a combined analysis of yield genotype x environment interaction with the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction models. Results. The hybrid HTE6 had the highest ear diameter (4.66 cm), ear weight (190, 76 g), number of rows per ear (14.26), grains per row (37.45), total grain weight (156.21 g), and grain yield (7.21 t ha-1). HTE6 showed superior adaptability in Iquitos (9.2 t ha-1) and San Martin (8.1 t ha-1). In the genotype-environmental interaction, it reached 7.18 t ha-1, with the highest stability in the eight localities. Conclusion. Among the five trilinear hybrids and the Marginal 28T variety, the HTE6 had the best agronomic performance and the highest yield in the eight evaluated locations. Thus, it is considered the more suitable trilinear hybrid for the tropical conditions of Peru.
C1 [Diaz-Chuquizuta, Percy; Hidalgo-Melendez, Edison; Mendoza-Paredes, Melbin] Inst Nacl Innovac Agr INIA, Estn Expt Agr El Porvenir, Jr Martinez de Compagnon 1035, Tarapoto, San Martin, Peru.
   [Cieza-Ruiz, Isaac] Inst Nacl Innovac Agr INIA, Estn Expt Agr Vista Florida, Km 8 Carretera Chiclayo Ferrenafe Km 8 Picsi, Lambayeque, Peru.
   [Jara-Calvo, Teofilo Wladimir] Inst Nacl Innovac Agr INIA, Estn Expt Agr Andenes, Ave Micaela Bastidas 314, Cuzco, Peru.
   [Valdes-Rodriguez, Ofelia Andrea] Colegio Veracruz, Carrillo Puerto 26, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
RP Valdés-Rodríguez, OA (corresponding author), Colegio Veracruz, Carrillo Puerto 26, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
EM pdiaz023@gmail.com; ehidalgo@inia.gob.pe; mmendoza@inia.gob.pe;
   icieza@inia.gob.pe; wjara@inia.gob.pe; dra.valdes.colver@gmail.com
RI Diaz-Chuquizuta, Percy/GZK-6058-2022; Valdes-Rodriguez,
   Ofelia/AAH-6032-2020; Cieza Ruiz, Isaac/JQW-9320-2023
OI Valdes Rodriguez, Ofelia Andrea/0000-0002-3702-6920; Cieza Ruiz,
   Isaac/0000-0002-3990-3966; DIAZ CHUQUIZUTA, PERCY/0000-0002-9893-5482;
   MENDOZA, MELBIN/0000-0002-3513-6552
CR Akhtar S, 2018, J INTEGR AGR, V17, P1454, DOI 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61796-9
   Aybar-Camacho C., 2017, Atlas de zonas de vida del Peru - Guia Explicativa
   Babu R, 2013, THEOR APPL GENET, V126, P389, DOI 10.1007/s00122-012-1987-3
   Bailey-Serres J, 2019, NATURE, V575, P109, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1679-0
   Barandiaran Gamarra M. A, 2020, MANUAL TECNICO CULTI
   Borroel García Victoria Jared, 2018, Terra Latinoam, V36, P423, DOI 10.28940/terra.v36i4.281
   Carballo Carballo A., 2014, GUIA TECNICA DESCRIP
   Carballo Carballo A., 2010, MANUAL GRAFICO DESCR
   Centro International de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo, 2005, MAIZ INBR LIN REL CI
   Chavez A., 2022, ACI Avances En Ciencias E Ingenierias, V14, P1, DOI [10.18272/aci.v14i1.2507, DOI 10.18272/ACI.V14I1.2507]
   Chura CJ, 2014, IDESIA ARICA, V32, P113, DOI [10.4067/S0718-, DOI 10.4067/S0718]
   Cieza RI, 2020, MANGLAR, V17, P261, DOI [10.17268/manglar.2020.038, DOI 10.17268/MANGLAR.2020.038]
   De Leon C, 2001, ANN REPORT 2001 S AM
   De Mendiburu Felipe, 2023, CRAN
   de Oliveira EJ, 2014, SCI AGR, V71, P139, DOI 10.1590/S0103-90162014000200008
   Fabian N.H., 2020, Peruvian Agricultura Research, V2, P60, DOI [10.51431/par.v2i2.643, DOI 10.51431/PAR.V2I2.643]
   Fan XingMing Fan XingMing, 2006, Journal of Maize Sciences, V14, P12
   Garcia-Rodriguez J. J., 2018, Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, V41, P31, DOI 10.35196/rfm.2018.1.31-37
   Guamán Guamán Rocío Noemí, 2020, Siembra, V7, P47, DOI 10.29166/siembra.v7i2.2196
   Hidalgo Melendez E, 2013, MANEJO TECNICO CULTI
   Huanuqueño H, 2021, SCI AGROPEC, V12, P535, DOI 10.17268/sci.agropecu.2021.058
   Huatay Mayra Karelly Garcia, 2019, Arnaldoa, V26, P793, DOI 10.22497/arnaldoa.262.26218
   Kandel BP, 2020, HELIYON, V6, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05542
   Li GL, 2020, CROP J, V8, P830, DOI 10.1016/j.cj.2020.04.006
   Lima-Medina I, 2018, REV INVESTIG ALTOAND, V20, P31, DOI 10.18271/ria.2018.328
   Liu L, 2015, MOL BREEDING, V35, DOI 10.1007/s11032-015-0349-7
   López-Morales Fernando, 2019, Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc, V10, P859, DOI 10.29312/remexca.v10i4.1696
   MacRobert J.F., 2014, Manual de produccion de semilla de maiz hibrido
   Medina-Hoyos A, 2020, SCI AGROPEC, V11, P291, DOI 10.17268/sci.agropecu.2020.03.01
   Moreyra Munoz J. C., 2022, B TRIMESTRAL
   Owusu G., 2018, Ecological Genetics and Genomics, V9, P7, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egg.2018.07.002, DOI 10.1016/J.EGG.2018.07.002, 10.1016/j.egg.2018.07.002]
   Quiroga-Cardona J., 2019, ORINOQUIA, V23, P85, DOI [10.22579/20112629.545, DOI 10.22579/20112629.545]
   Rebolloza Hernández Hermes, 2016, Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc, V7, P1893
   Rezende WS, 2020, CROP J, V8, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.cj.2019.08.001
   RStudio Team, 2015, RStudio: Integrated development for R Computer software, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2340-5
   Sanchez Arizo V. H., 2020, REV LATINOAMERICANA, V51, P85, DOI [10.22201/iiec.20078951-.2020.203.69527, DOI 10.22201/IIEC.20078951-.2020.203.69527]
   SEMARNAT (Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales), 2002, Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-021 SEMARNAT-2000 antes NOM- 021-RECNAT-2000
   Union Internacional para la Proteccion de las Obtenciones Vegetales, 2009, DIR EJ EX DIST HOM E
   United States Foreign Agricultural Service, 2022, CORN 2022 WORLD PROD
   Vasco Medina Alfonso, 2017, Siembra, V4, P66, DOI 10.29166/siembra.v4i1.501
   Vélez-Torres M, 2018, REV FITOTEC MEX, V41, P167
   Zambrano Carlos Edison, 2021, Universidad y Sociedad, P143
NR 42
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PU UNIV COSTA RICA
PI SAN JOSE
PA CENTRO INVESTIGACIONES AGRONOMICAS, APDO POSTAL 183-4050, SAN JOSE,
   00000, COSTA RICA
EI 2215-3608
J9 AGRON MESOAM
JI Agron. Mesoam.
PD JAN-APR
PY 2023
VL 34
IS 1
AR 51177
DI 10.15517/am.v34i1.51177
PG 18
WC Agronomy
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Agriculture
GA 8I3HE
UT WOS:000921615400022
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Joshi, GR
   Bhandari, R
AF Joshi, Ganesh Raj
   Bhandari, Ramchandra
TI Climate Adaptation in Rain-fed Agriculture: Analyzing the Determinants
   of Supplemental Irrigation Practices in Nepal
SO RESEARCH ON WORLD AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY
LA English
DT Article
DE Agriculture; Adaptation; Climate; Supplemental irrigation; Perceptions;
   Nepal
ID ADOPTION
AB Climate change has severely impacted the rain-fed agricultural production system which is dominant in Nepal. This situation demands implementable strategies like supplemental irrigation for mitigating adverse impacts. In spite of the importance of supplemental irrigation, it is not adopted on a wider scale. Hence, this paper aims to assess perceptions of climate change and identify factors that influence the adoption of supplemental irrigation practices. Climate change impact survey data for Province No. 1 (one of the seven provinces in Nepal) with a sample of 800 households were analyzed by using the probit regression model. The results showed that the majority of the farmers perceived increasing temperature and decreasing precipitation, resulting in climate-induced disasters such as drought. Similarly, only about 27% of the households have adopted supplemental irrigation practices. The significant factors influencing the adoption of supplemental irrigation practices were the household head's number of years of farming experience and education level, distance to motorable roads, operational size of landholding, membership in community-based organizations, and the perception of changes in summer temperature. Considering the empirical results, it is necessary to undertake research on sustainable practices and develop support measures for scaling up this practice as the adoption of this practice is very low in Province No. 1. The policy and strategy should also emphasize enhancing the capacity of farmers in technical and managerial aspects of supplemental irrigation practices, raising awareness about climate change and its impact, and strengthening community- based organizations for sharing and exchanging knowledge and skills. In addition, creating additional employment opportunities to enhance the income of the farmers for mitigating the capital constraint and increasing investment in infrastructures like roads for improving physical access thereby promoting adoption.
C1 [Joshi, Ganesh Raj] Agr & Forestry Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness Management, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal.
   [Bhandari, Ramchandra] Univ Appl Sci, Inst Technol & Resources Management Trop & Subtrop, Cologne, Germany.
RP Joshi, GR (corresponding author), Agr & Forestry Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness Management, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal.
EM grjoshi20@gmail.com
OI Bhandari, Ramchandra/0000-0002-4892-0397
FU German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through its Project
   Management Agency Julich under the framework of RETO-DOSSO project
FX The authors are grateful to the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for
   granting renewed research stay of the first author at the Institute for
   Technology and Resources Management in the Tropics and Subtropics (ITT)
   , University of Applied Sciences Cologne, Germany. The authors would
   like to acknowledge the financial support from the German Federal
   Ministry of Education and Research through its Project Management Agency
   Julich under the framework of RETO-DOSSO project. The authors also would
   like to thank Nepal's Central Bureau of Statistics for availing
   datasets.
CR ADESINA AA, 1993, AGR ECON, V9, P297, DOI 10.1016/0169-5150(93)90019-9
   ADS, About us
   Agarwal A, 2016, INT J CLIMATOL, V36, P266, DOI 10.1002/joc.4342
   [Anonymous], 2022, Water in Agriculture
   [Anonymous], 2007, Discussion Paper 00714
   [Anonymous], Progress Report, FY 2020/21 Internet
   [Anonymous], 2017, Climate-Smart Agriculture in Nepal. CSA Country Profiles for Asia Series
   [Anonymous], 2021, Climate Risk Country Profile-Bhutan
   [Anonymous], 2017, National Climate Change Adaptation Strategy
   Apata T.G., 2011, 85 ANN C AGR EC SOC
   Awuni J. A., 2018, Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics, V21, P48
   Deressa TT, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.01.002
   Destaw F, 2021, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V13, DOI 10.4102/jamba.v13i1.974
   Faruk MO, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14148959
   Global Climate Risk Index, 2021, Who Suffers Most from Extreme Weather Events? Weather-related Loss Events in 2019 and 2000-2019 Internet
   Joshi B, 2017, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V9, P433, DOI [10.1108/IJCCSM-07-2016-0099, 10.1108/ijccsm-07-2016-0099]
   Joshi G.R., 2018, Agricultural economy of Nepal: Development challenges & opportunities
   Joshi GR, 2019, AGRICULTURAL TRANSFORMATION IN NEPAL: TRENDS, PROSPECTS, AND POLICY OPTIONS, P119, DOI 10.1007/978-981-32-9648-0_6
   Juana J. S., 2013, Journal of Agricultural Science (Toronto), V5, P121
   Katungi E, 2010, ACTA HORTIC, V879, P719, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.879.77
   mof.gov, Economic Survey 2021/22
   MoFE, 2021, Third national communication report
   MoFE, 2021, Vulnerability and risk assessment and identifying adaptation options in the agriculture and food security
   MoSTE, 2014, Economic assessment of the climate change of the key sectors in Nepal
   Myeni L, 2020, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/agriculture10090410
   Nangia V., 2018, Supplemental Irrigation: A Promising Climate-smart Practice for Dryland Agriculture Internet
   Nepal S, 2016, J HYDRO-ENVIRON RES, V10, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.jher.2015.12.001
   Oweis T. Y., 2003, Water productivity in agriculture: limits and opportunities for improvement, P179, DOI 10.1079/9780851996691.0179
   Pedzisa T., 2015, Abandonment of conservation agriculture by tainable Development, V8, P69
   Pokhrel BK, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10060706
   Sharma S., 2020, APPL ECOLOGY ENV SCI, V8, P64, DOI [10.12691/aees-8-2-4, DOI 10.12691/AEES-8-2-4]
   Shrestha S, 2016, CLIM RISK MANAG, V14, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2016.08.002
   Tan YF, 2020, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V12, P431, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-11-2019-0063
   Thapa Y.B., 2003, Asian Development Bank under project TA 3451 NP
   unfccc, National Adaptation Plan
NR 35
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 0
PU Nan Yang Acad Sciences - NASS
PI Singapore
PA 12 Eu Tong Sen Street, #07-169, Singapore, SINGAPORE
SN 2737-4777
EI 2737-4785
J9 RES WORLD AGR ECON
JI Res. World Agric. Econ.
PD DEC
PY 2022
VL 3
IS 4
BP 48
EP 58
DI 10.36956/rwae.v3i4.761
PG 11
WC Agricultural Economics & Policy
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Agriculture
GA K5W5E
UT WOS:001344575600005
OA hybrid, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Curti, RN
   Ortega-Baes, P
   Ratto, S
   Bertero, D
AF Curti, Ramiro N.
   Ortega-Baes, Pablo
   Ratto, Santiago
   Bertero, Daniel
TI Harnessing phenological traits of wild ancestor <i>Chenopodium
   hircinum</i> to improve climate adaptation of quinoa
SO CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Chenopodium hircinum; development patterns; eco-geographic variables;
   germplasm; heat stress; pre-breeding; quinoa; wild ancestors
ID TEMPERATURE; PHOTOPERIOD; DIVERSITY; RELATIVES; RESPONSES; ACCESSIONS;
   NUMBER
AB Context Cultivation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) is rapidly expanding worldwide. Characterisation of populations of Chenopodium hircinum Schard., its wild ancestor, which thrives in some of the hottest environments in South America, may provide adaptations to new environments. Aims This study evaluated the developmental patterns of populations of C. hircinum collected from a range of agroecological environments in Argentina, in order to quantify variability among sites of origin and to explore the association between climatic data from environments of provenance and variation in development. Methods Thirty-three populations of C. hircinum from contrasting sites of origin in Argentina were multiplied in a common-garden experiment under non-limiting conditions of water and nutrient availability. Plants were sampled once or twice weekly (according to parameter) for estimation of the duration of developmental phases, leaf number, and dates of initiation of branching on the main stem. Key results Significant variation was detected for all phenological traits, and populations were categorised into six groups based on similarity of patterns of variation. We found positive association of the duration of development phases and the number of leaves on the main-stem with maximum temperature during the growing season, and negative association with altitude of origin, consistent with variation in growing-season duration. Conclusions The finding that late-flowering populations are associated with warmest climates reveals that longer vegetative growth is an adaptive strategy to cope with heat stress in Chenopodium spp. Implications Time to flowering should be considered in attempts to improve quinoa performance under heat-stress conditions. Further work is needed to understand the genetic basis controlling this response in wild populations of C. hircinum.
C1 [Curti, Ramiro N.; Ortega-Baes, Pablo] Univ Nacl Salta, CONICET, Fac Ciencias Nat, Lab Invest Botan LABIBO, Salta, Argentina.
   [Curti, Ramiro N.; Ortega-Baes, Pablo] Univ Nacl Salta, CONICET, Sede Reg Sur, Salta, Argentina.
   [Ratto, Santiago; Bertero, Daniel] Univ Buenos Aires, CONICET, Fac Agron, Catedra Prod Vegetal, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina.
   [Ratto, Santiago; Bertero, Daniel] Univ Buenos Aires, CONICET, Fac Agron, Inst Invest Fisiol & Ecol Vinculadas Agr IFEVA, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina.
C3 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET);
   Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET);
   University of Buenos Aires; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones
   Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET); University of Buenos Aires; Consejo
   Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET)
RP Curti, RN (corresponding author), Univ Nacl Salta, Fac Ciencias Nat, Escuela Agron, Ave Bolivia, RA-5150 Salta, Argentina.
EM rcurti@agro.uba.ar
OI Curti, Ramiro/0000-0001-8353-8858
FU FONCYT (Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnica) [PICT-2018-03456]; CONICET
   (the Argentine Scientific Research Council) [PIP 11220170100459 CO,
   OSR-2016-CRG5-2966]; KAUST University
FX This research was supported by FONCYT (Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y
   Tecnica, project PICT-2018-03456) and CONICET (the Argentine Scientific
   Research Council, project PIP 11220170100459 CO). The C. hircinum
   collection trip was supported by grant OSR-2016-CRG5-2966 from KAUST
   University.
CR Al-Hajaj N, 2022, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V69, P1485, DOI 10.1007/s10722-021-01314-1
   Asseng S, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P143, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2470, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2470]
   Atkinson D, 1996, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V1, P119, DOI 10.1016/S1360-1385(96)90006-0
   Atlin GN, 2017, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V12, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2017.01.008
   Baturaygil A, 2022, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/agronomy12020505
   Bazile D, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00850
   Berger J, 2020, FRONT GENET, V11, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2020.607819
   Bertero HD, 2008, EUR J AGRON, V28, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2007.07.002
   Bertero H.D., 2021, QUINOA CROP PHYSL CA, P250, DOI [10.1016/b978-0-12-819194-1.00007-4, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-819194-1.00007-4]
   Bertero HD, 1999, FIELD CROP RES, V63, P19, DOI 10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00024-6
   Bertero HD, 2000, AUST J PLANT PHYSIOL, V27, P349, DOI 10.1071/PP99134
   Bertero HD, 2003, FOOD REV INT, V19, P87, DOI 10.1081/FRI-120018870
   Bunce JA, 2017, PLANTS-BASEL, V6, DOI 10.3390/plants6030026
   Choukr-Allah R, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00346
   Curti RN, 2017, BIOL CONSERV, V209, P349, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.03.008
   Curti RN, 2016, FIELD CROP RES, V189, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.01.014
   Curti RN, 2012, ANN APPL BIOL, V160, P114, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2011.00524.x
   Curti R. N., 2021, The Quinoa Genome, P13, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-65237-1_2
   Curti RN, 2022, BIOSALINE AGR CLIMAT, P1
   de San Celedonio RP, 2018, PLANT SOIL, V429, P469, DOI 10.1007/s11104-018-3708-4
   Di Rienzo J.A., 2012, InfoStat Version 2020
   Enkhbat G, 2021, CROP PASTURE SCI, V72, P1022, DOI 10.1071/CP21226
   Galván MZ, 2006, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V53, P891, DOI 10.1007/s10722-004-0981-2
   Garcia-Parra M.A., 2020, Sylwan, V164, P411
   Greene SL, 2017, CROP SCI, V57, P1039, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2017.04.0001in
   Grenfell-Shaw L., 2021, The Quinoa Genome, P139, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-65237-1_9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-65237-1-9]
   Hafeez MB, 2022, PLANTS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/plants11060738
   Hernández F, 2018, EUPHYTICA, V214, DOI 10.1007/s10681-018-2227-y
   Hinojosa L, 2019, J AGRON CROP SCI, V205, P33, DOI 10.1111/jac.12302
   Humphries AW, 2021, CROP SCI, V61, P69, DOI 10.1002/csc2.20274
   Jarvis DE, 2017, NATURE, V542, P307, DOI 10.1038/nature21370
   Jellen EN, 2021, QUINOA GENOMECOMPEND, P33, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-65237-1_3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-65237-1_3]
   Kamenya SN, 2021, THEOR APPL GENET, V134, P1787, DOI 10.1007/s00122-020-03755-1
   Khan MK, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2021.736614
   Kilian B, 2021, CROP SCI, V61, P32, DOI 10.1002/csc2.20418
   Langridge P, 2021, THEOR APPL GENET, V134, P1607, DOI 10.1007/s00122-021-03854-7
   Le S, 2008, J STAT SOFTW, V25, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v025.i01
   Lesjak J, 2017, FRONT PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.00352
   Maughan PJ, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-36693-6
   Moghaddam SM, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22858-x
   Mousavi-Derazmahalleh M, 2018, THEOR APPL GENET, V131, P887, DOI 10.1007/s00122-017-3045-7
   Nevo E, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P3412, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1121411109
   Nooryazdan H, 2010, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V57, P27, DOI 10.1007/s10722-009-9448-9
   Olivoto T, 2020, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V11, P783, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.13384
   Ortiz-Bobea A, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, P306, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-01000-1
   Renzi JP, 2022, FRONT PLANT SCI, V13, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2022.886162
   Patiranage DSR, 2021, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V44, P2565, DOI 10.1111/pce.14071
   Porch TG, 2013, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V3, P433, DOI 10.3390/agronomy3020433
   Quezada-Martinez D, 2021, THEOR APPL GENET, V134, P1711, DOI 10.1007/s00122-021-03793-3
   R Core Team, 2020, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
   Teso MLR, 2022, FRONT PLANT SCI, V13, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2022.817849
   Ruiz KB, 2014, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V34, P349, DOI 10.1007/s13593-013-0195-0
   Schwinning S, 2022, J ECOL, V110, P986, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13887
   Stanschewski CS, 2021, PLANTS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/plants10091759
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Toker C, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2021.662891
   WILSON HD, 1990, ECON BOT, V44, P92, DOI 10.1007/BF02860478
   WILSON HD, 1988, SYST BOT, V13, P215, DOI 10.2307/2419100
   Yang A, 2016, J AGRON CROP SCI, V202, P445, DOI 10.1111/jac.12167
NR 59
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 0
U2 9
PU CSIRO PUBLISHING
PI CLAYTON
PA UNIPARK, BLDG 1, LEVEL 1, 195 WELLINGTON RD, LOCKED BAG 10, CLAYTON, VIC
   3168, AUSTRALIA
SN 1836-0947
EI 1836-5795
J9 CROP PASTURE SCI
JI Crop Pasture Sci.
PY 2023
VL 74
IS 11
BP 1058
EP 1068
DI 10.1071/CP22187
EA OCT 2022
PG 11
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA LW1Q5
UT WOS:000873887500001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Nielsen, UB
   Hansen, CB
   Hansen, U
   Johansen, VK
   Egertsdotter, U
AF Nielsen, Ulrik Brauener
   Hansen, Camilla Buelow
   Hansen, Ulrich
   Johansen, Vivian Kvist
   Egertsdotter, Ulrika
TI Accumulated effects of factors determining plant development from
   somatic embryos of <i>Abies nordmanniana</i> and <i>Abies
   bornmuelleriana</i>
SO FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE abies; conifer; in vitro; germination; embryo quality; nordmann fir;
   turkish fir
ID SPRUCE PICEA-GLAUCA; GENETIC-CONTROL; POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL; CLIMATIC
   ADAPTATION; EMBRYOGENESIS; GERMINATION; MATURATION; REGENERATION;
   TEMPERATURE; INITIATION
AB Despite a much later inception of somatic embryogenesis (SE) propagation protocols for gymnosperms than for angiosperm species, SE is becoming increasingly important due to its applications for commercial forestry. For many conifers, there are however still major bottlenecks in the SE plant production process limiting the use of SE for forestry operations, Christmas tree production and research projects. In the present case study, the effects on plant growth from different cultural factors applied during the SE developmental process were studied in two conifer species of high value for Christmas tree production. Seven clones of Abies nordmanniana and two clones of Abies bornmuelleriana were included in the study. Accumulated effects from cultural treatments were recorded from the start of germination of mature embryos of different quality scores through development into plants in the third growing period. Experimental factors of the cultural treatments included were: germination temperature, germination time, light conditions, survival ex vitro and traits for plant growth and vitality. The results reveal that most of the studied experimental factors influenced plant growth during the first three years however their relative importance was different. Plant survival rate at end of the nursery stage was strongly impacted by germination temperature (p<0.001), initial embryo score (p=0.007), clone (p<0.001) and to a lesser extend week of germination (p=0.017). This case-study highlights and quantifies the strong interrelation between the developmental steps of somatic embryogenesis and show the importance of considering all cultural steps when optimizing SE plant production protocols.
C1 [Nielsen, Ulrik Brauener; Hansen, Camilla Buelow; Johansen, Vivian Kvist] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Geosci & Nat Resource Management, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
   [Hansen, Ulrich] Hansen Skovplant, Frankfri, Denmark.
   [Egertsdotter, Ulrika] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Umea Plant Sci Ctr, Dept Forest Genet & Plant Physiol, Umea, Sweden.
   [Egertsdotter, Ulrika] Georgia Inst Technol, Renewable Bioprod Inst, Atlanta, GA USA.
C3 University of Copenhagen; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences;
   Umea University; University System of Georgia; Georgia Institute of
   Technology
RP Nielsen, UB (corresponding author), Univ Copenhagen, Dept Geosci & Nat Resource Management, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
EM ubn@ign.ku.dk
RI Johannsen, Vivian Kvist/A-1926-2015; Nielsen, Ulrik Brauner/B-9952-2017
OI Johannsen, Vivian Kvist/0000-0002-1268-9787; Egertsdotter,
   Ulrika/0000-0002-0696-4279; Nielsen, Ulrik Brauner/0000-0001-7198-1924
FU Green Development and Demonstration Program Danish Agricultural Agency
   [340009_16_1081]
FX The project was partly financed by the Green Development and
   Demonstration Program, grant 340009_16_1081, Danish Agricultural Agency
   - years 2016-2021.
CR Baskin CC, 2014, SEEDS: ECOLOGY, BIOGEOGRAPHY, AND EVOLUTION OF DORMANCY AND GERMINATION, 2ND EDITION, P1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-416677-6.00001-9
   Batlla D, 2010, PLANT MOL BIOL, V73, P3, DOI 10.1007/s11103-010-9601-z
   Blodtner-Piske C., 2017, NADEL J, V11, P36
   Bonga JM, 2015, CAN J FOREST RES, V45, P379, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0360
   Businge E, 2013, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V149, P273, DOI 10.1111/ppl.12039
   Chalupa V., 1985, Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Cechosloveniae, V14, P57
   Chamberland V, 2020, TREE GENET GENOMES, V16, DOI 10.1007/s11295-019-1409-7
   CHELIAK WM, 1991, THEOR APPL GENET, V82, P185, DOI 10.1007/BF00226211
   Christensen C.J., 2016, GEN M DANISH CHRISTM
   Cui Y, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2021.751891
   De La Torre AR, 2022, PLANT J, V109, P7, DOI 10.1111/tpj.15592
   Dungey HS, 2009, SILVAE GENET, V58, P28, DOI 10.1515/sg-2009-0004
   Edwards D.G.W., 2003, P ISTA FOREST TREE S, V2003, P18
   Egertsdotter U, 2019, FRONT PLANT SCI, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2019.00109
   Egertsdotter U, 2019, SCAND J FOREST RES, V34, P360, DOI 10.1080/02827581.2018.1441433
   Ekberg I., 1979, Ecography, V2, P255, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1600-0587.1979.TB01297.X, 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1979.tb01297.x]
   FARJON A, 1989, Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, V46, P59
   Fenning T., 2014, Challenges and Opportunities for the World's Forests in the 21st Century, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-7076-8, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7076-8]
   Filonova LH, 2000, J EXP BOT, V51, P249, DOI 10.1093/jexbot/51.343.249
   Find J.I., 2020, Method for growing somatic embryos of conifers into trees, Patent No. 3648576
   Find J.I., 2016, VEGETATIVE PROPAGATI, P528
   Find J.I., 2020, Method for growing somatic embryos of conifers into trees, Patent No. 2020236884
   Gupta P.K., 2011, Methods for producing a synchronized population of conifer somatic embryos, Patent No. 07888099
   HAKMAN I, 1985, PLANT SCI, V38, P53, DOI 10.1016/0168-9452(85)90079-2
   Hatzilazarou S, 2021, PLANTS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/plants10122606
   Hogberg K.A., 2016, VEGETATIVE PROPAGATI, P538
   Högberg KA, 2003, TREE PHYSIOL, V23, P211, DOI 10.1093/treephys/23.3.211
   HRISTOFOROGLU K, 1995, PLANT CELL TISS ORG, V40, P277, DOI 10.1007/BF00048134
   Jamruszka A.M., 2009, Forming stratified cotyledonary conifer somatic embryos for producing plants involves incubating immature conifer somatic embryos in development medium of specific osmolality, for first and second incubation period at different temperature, Patent No. 2009087908
   Johnsen O, 2005, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V28, P1090, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01356.x
   Klimaszewska K, 2016, METHODS MOL BIOL, V1359, P131, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3061-6_7
   Krajnaková J, 2016, METHODS MOL BIOL, V1359, P417, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3061-6_22
   Krajnáková J, 2009, PLANT CELL TISS ORG, V96, P251, DOI 10.1007/s11240-008-9482-x
   Kvaalen H, 2005, CAN J FOREST RES, V35, P1053, DOI 10.1139/X05-035
   Kvaalen H, 1999, IN VITRO CELL DEV-PL, V35, P437, DOI 10.1007/s11627-999-0064-3
   Kvaalen H, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V177, P49, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02222.x
   Landis T.D., 2010, SEEDLING PROPAGATION, V6, P3
   Lauer E, 2022, G3-GENES GENOM GENET, V12, DOI 10.1093/g3journal/jkab405
   Le KC, 2021, BIOSYST ENG, V203, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.12.013
   Lindgren D., 2008, VEGETATIVE PROPAGATI, V114, P08
   Liu T. S., 1971, A monograph of the genus Abies.
   Liu Y, 2015, SEED SCI RES, V25, P29, DOI 10.1017/S0960258514000361
   Lobo A, 2022, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V514, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120212
   MacKay JJ, 2006, TREE GENET GENOMES, V2, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11295-005-0020-2
   Mamun NHA, 2018, IN VITRO CELL DEV-PL, V54, P612, DOI 10.1007/s11627-018-9911-4
   Montagnoli A, 2018, PLANT BIOSYST, V152, P515, DOI 10.1080/11263504.2018.1435583
   Montalbán IA, 2012, ACTA PHYSIOL PLANT, V34, P451, DOI 10.1007/s11738-011-0841-6
   Morel A, 2014, PLANTA, V240, P1075, DOI 10.1007/s00425-014-2125-z
   NAGMANI R, 1985, CAN J FOREST RES, V15, P1088, DOI 10.1139/x85-177
   Navidad H, 2020, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/agronomy10050712
   Nawrot-Chorabik K, 2016, J FORESTRY RES, V27, P1219, DOI 10.1007/s11676-016-0265-7
   Nielsen M.S.L., 2017, N LEDRYS, V102, P12
   Nielsen U.B, 2022, SLUTRAPPORT GUDP PRO
   Nielsen U.B., 2021, N LEDRYS, V116, P38
   Nielsen U.B., 2018, BOOK ABSTRACTS PROGR
   Nielsen UB, 2020, TREE GENET GENOMES, V16, DOI 10.1007/s11295-020-01461-z
   Norgaard JV, 1997, PLANT SCI, V124, P211, DOI 10.1016/S0168-9452(97)04614-1
   NORGAARD JV, 1993, SILVAE GENET, V42, P93
   Ouzounis T, 2015, HORTSCIENCE, V50, P1128, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.50.8.1128
   PARK YS, 1994, THEOR APPL GENET, V89, P742, DOI 10.1007/BF00223714
   PARK YS, 1993, THEOR APPL GENET, V86, P427, DOI 10.1007/BF00838557
   Park YS, 2002, ANN FOR SCI, V59, P651, DOI 10.1051/forest:2002051
   Poovaiah C, 2021, BMC PLANT BIOL, V21, DOI 10.1186/s12870-021-03143-x
   Pullman GS, 2016, NEW FOREST, V47, P453, DOI 10.1007/s11056-016-9525-9
   Rasmussen HN, 2020, NEW FOREST, V51, P781, DOI 10.1007/s11056-019-09759-0
   Rikala R., 2012, METSAPUIDEN PAAKKUTA, V2012
   Rosvall O, 1998, SILVAE GENET, V47, P307
   Salaj T, 2004, ACTA BIOL CRACOV BOT, V46, P159
   Salaj T, 2003, BIOL PLANTARUM, V47, P7, DOI 10.1023/A:1027312410957
   Salaj Terezia, 2005, V77, P483
   Salaj T, 2020, FORESTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/f11111210
   Salaj T, 2019, FRONT PLANT SCI, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2019.00013
   Salaj T, 2016, BIOLOGIA, V71, P93, DOI 10.1515/biolog-2016-0004
   Salajová T, 2001, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V158, P747, DOI 10.1078/0176-1617-00278
   SAS, 2013, SAS VERS 9 4
   Stasolla C, 2002, IN VITRO CELL DEV-PL, V38, P93, DOI 10.1079/IVP2001262
   Tikkinen M, 2018, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V32, P1489, DOI 10.1007/s00468-018-1728-6
   Tikkinen M, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9060325
   Uddenberg D, 2015, FRONT PLANT SCI, V6, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00970
   Vaelimaeki S, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2021.791549
   Valdiani A, 2020, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V17, P1425, DOI 10.1007/s13762-019-02556-4
   Varis S, 2021, FORESTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/f12030301
   Velasco MH, 2019, SCAND J FOREST RES, V34, P159, DOI 10.1080/02827581.2019.1578404
   Vooková B, 2002, IN VITRO CELL DEV-PL, V38, P549, DOI 10.1079/IVP2002330
   White T. L., 2007, Forest Genetics
   Yakovlev IA, 2011, PLANT SCI, V180, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.07.004
   YOUNG E, 1978, FOREST SCI, V24, P458
NR 87
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 2
U2 25
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
SN 1664-462X
J9 FRONT PLANT SCI
JI Front. Plant Sci.
PD OCT 13
PY 2022
VL 13
AR 989484
DI 10.3389/fpls.2022.989484
PG 19
WC Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences
GA 5U3RG
UT WOS:000876467700001
PM 36311146
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sun, XR
   Ge, F
   Fan, Y
   Zhu, SP
   Chen, QL
AF Sun, Xuerong
   Ge, Fei
   Fan, Yi
   Zhu, Shoupeng
   Chen, Quanliang
TI Will population exposure to heat extremes intensify over Southeast Asia
   in a warmer world?
SO ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
LA English
DT Article
DE Southeast Asia; population exposure; temperature extremes; CMIP6
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; TEMPERATURE; MORTALITY; PRECIPITATION; CHINA; CMIP6;
   WAVE; INDEXES; EVENTS; TRENDS
AB Temperature extremes have increased during the past several decades and are expected to intensify under current rapid global warming over Southeast Asia (SEA). Exposure to rising temperatures in highly vulnerable regions affects populations, ecosystems, and other elements that may suffer potential losses. Here, we evaluate changes in temperature extremes and future population exposure over SEA at global warming levels (GWLs) of 2.0 degrees C and 3.0 degrees C using outputs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6. Results indicate that temperature extreme indices are projected to increase over SEA at both GWLs, with more significant magnitudes at 3.0 degrees C. However, daily temperature ranges show a decrease. The substantial increase in total SEA population exposure to heat extremes from 730 million person-days at 2.0 degrees C GWL to 1200 million person-days at 3.0 degrees C GWL is mostly contributed by the climate change component, accounting for 48%. In addition, if global warming is restricted well below 2.0 degrees C, the avoided impacts in population exposure are prominent for most regions over SEA with the largest mitigation in the Philippines. Aggregate population exposure to impacts is decreased by approximately 39% at 2.0 degrees C GWL, while the interaction component effect, which is associated with increased population and climate change, would decrease by 53%. This indicates serious consequences for growing populations concurrent with global warming impacts if the current fossil-fueled development pathway is adhered to. The present study estimates the risks of increased temperature extremes and population exposure in a warmer future, and further emphasizes the necessity and urgency of implementing climate adaptation and mitigation strategies in SEA.
C1 [Sun, Xuerong; Ge, Fei; Chen, Quanliang] Chengdu Univ Informat Technol, Sch Atmospher Sci, Plateau Atmosphere & Environm Key Lab Sichuan Pro, Joint Lab Climate & Environm Change, Chengdu, Peoples R China.
   [Fan, Yi] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast & Evaluat Meteoro, Minist Educ, Key Lab Meteorol Disasters, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
   [Zhu, Shoupeng] CMA, Key Lab Transportat Meteorol, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
   [Zhu, Shoupeng] Nanjing Joint Inst Atmospher Sci, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
C3 Chengdu University of Information Technology; Nanjing University of
   Information Science & Technology; China Meteorological Administration
RP Ge, F (corresponding author), Chengdu Univ Informat Technol, Sch Atmospher Sci, Plateau Atmosphere & Environm Key Lab Sichuan Pro, Joint Lab Climate & Environm Change, Chengdu, Peoples R China.
EM figo@cuit.edu.cn
RI Ge, Fei/ACV-9785-2022; Zhu, Shoupeng/IUM-5866-2023
OI Fan, Yi/0000-0002-2411-7129; Zhu, Shoupeng/0000-0002-4741-1179
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [U20A2097, 4210050408]
FX The National Natural Science Foundation of China (U20A2097, 4210050408).
CR An N, 2021, SCI CHINA EARTH SCI, V64, P1242, DOI 10.1007/s11430-020-9776-3
   Anderson BG, 2009, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V20, P205, DOI 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318190ee08
   [Anonymous], 2018, GLOBAL WARMING 15 C, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009157940.001
   [Anonymous], 2011, The Global Monsoon System: Research and Forecast
   [Anonymous], 2013, Climate Change 2013, V5
   Åström DO, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P1050, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2022, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2022]
   Barnett TP, 1999, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V26, P615, DOI 10.1029/1999GL900042
   Barriopedro D, 2011, SCIENCE, V332, P220, DOI 10.1126/science.1201224
   Barros VR, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1133
   Batibeniz F, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001421
   Bindoff NL, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P867
   Bobb JF, 2014, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V122, P811, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1307392
   Caesar J, 2006, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V111, DOI 10.1029/2005JD006280
   Carleton TA, 2016, SCIENCE, V353, DOI 10.1126/science.aad9837
   Chen HP, 2020, SCI BULL, V65, P1415, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2020.05.015
   Chen HP, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab751f
   Chen HP, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab072e
   Cook BI, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001461
   Dole R, 2011, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V38, DOI 10.1029/2010GL046582
   Dong ZZ, 2021, EARTHS FUTURE, V9, DOI 10.1029/2021EF001992
   Eyring V, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P1937, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
   Gasparrini A, 2015, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V123, P1200, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1409070
   Ge F, 2021, CLIM DYNAM, V57, P2491, DOI 10.1007/s00382-021-05817-6
   Ge F, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abd7ad
   Ge F, 2019, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V135, P1609, DOI 10.1007/s00704-018-2457-x
   Ge F, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaff7e
   Ge F, 2017, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V128, P523, DOI 10.1007/s00704-015-1729-y
   Gleckler PJ, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V113, DOI 10.1029/2007JD008972
   Hajat S, 2006, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V17, P632, DOI 10.1097/01.ede.0000239688.70829.63
   Harrington LJ, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaaa99
   Hoag H., 2014, Nature, V16, P636, DOI [10.1038/nature.2014.16250, DOI 10.1038/NATURE.2014.16250]
   HORTON B, 1995, ATMOS RES, V37, P101, DOI 10.1016/0169-8095(94)00083-P
   Ishigami A, 2008, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V7, DOI 10.1186/1476-069X-7-5
   Iyakaremye V, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V790, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148162
   Jones B, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/084003
   Jones B, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V146, P423, DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-2133-7
   Jones B, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P652, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2631, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2631]
   Jun Matsumoto, 1997, Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, V14, P231
   Kim YH, 2020, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V29, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2020.100269
   King AD, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P412, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3296, 10.1038/nclimate3296]
   Kumar R, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2020EF001731
   Kunkel KE, 1996, B AM METEOROL SOC, V77, P1507, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<1507:TJHWIT>2.0.CO;2
   Li C, 2021, J CLIMATE, V34, P3441, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-1013.1
   Li DH, 2018, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V45, P1541, DOI 10.1002/2017GL076753
   Liao WL, 2018, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V45, P11310, DOI 10.1029/2018GL079679
   Liu CH, 2017, CLIM DYNAM, V49, P71, DOI 10.1007/s00382-016-3327-9
   Liu Z, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/srep43909
   Martínez MD, 2010, INT J CLIMATOL, V30, P267, DOI 10.1002/joc.1884
   Masson-Delmotte V., 2021, Climate change 2021: The physical science basis, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781009157896, 10.1017/9781009157896.002, DOI 10.1017/9781009157896.002]
   McGregor GR, 2018, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/atmos9070282
   McMichael AJ, 2006, LANCET, V367, P859, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68079-3
   McPhaden MJ, 2006, SCIENCE, V314, P1740, DOI 10.1126/science.1132588
   Meehl GA, 2004, SCIENCE, V305, P994, DOI 10.1126/science.1098704
   Mora C, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P501, DOI [10.1038/nclimate3322, 10.1038/NCLIMATE3322]
   Mukherjee S, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-35348-w
   O'Neill BC, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P3461, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016
   Prein AF, 2015, REV GEOPHYS, V53, P323, DOI 10.1002/2014RG000475
   Radinovic D, 2012, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V107, P505, DOI 10.1007/s00704-011-0495-8
   Rogelj J, 2016, NAT GEOSCI, V9, P187, DOI 10.1038/ngeo2668
   Rohat G, 2019, EARTHS FUTURE, V7, P528, DOI 10.1029/2018EF001020
   Russo S, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124003
   Sheikh MM, 2015, INT J CLIMATOL, V35, P1625, DOI 10.1002/joc.4081
   Sillmann J, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V118, P1716, DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50203
   Sillmann J, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V118, P2473, DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50188
   Smithes CJ, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-07999-w
   Stott PA, 2004, NATURE, V432, P610, DOI 10.1038/nature03089
   Stott P, 2016, SCIENCE, V352, P1517, DOI 10.1126/science.aaf7271
   Stott PA, 2010, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V1, P192, DOI 10.1002/wcc.34
   Swart NC, 2019, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V12, P4823, DOI 10.5194/gmd-12-4823-2019
   Thirumalai K, 2017, NAT COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1038/ncomms15531
   Ullah S, 2019, CLIM DYNAM, V53, P6329, DOI 10.1007/s00382-019-04934-7
   UNFCCC, 2015, ADOPTION PARIS AGREE, V32
   Van den Besselaar EJM, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P5151, DOI [10.1175/jcli-d-16-0575.1, 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0575.1]
   Van Der Schrier G., 2016, J CLIMATE, V29, P2651, DOI [10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00574.1, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00574.1]
   Vautard R, 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034006
   Wang B, 2002, J CLIMATE, V15, P1643, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<1643:HSEEAT>2.0.CO;2
   Wang B, 2001, J CLIMATE, V14, P4073, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<4073:IVOTAS>2.0.CO;2
   Wang J., 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, P11
   Wang J, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, P1084, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-01196-2
   Webster PJ, 1998, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V103, P14451, DOI 10.1029/97JC02719
   WMO, 2011, 1074 WMO
   WMO, 2021, 1264 WMO
   Xie WX, 2020, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V141, P1529, DOI 10.1007/s00704-020-03285-2
   Xu ZF, 2021, SCI DATA, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41597-021-01079-3
   Yang XL, 2021, ADV ATMOS SCI, V38, P817, DOI 10.1007/s00376-021-0351-4
   Yao Y, 2013, J CLIMATE, V26, P7692, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00560.1
   You QL, 2017, CLIM DYNAM, V48, P3975, DOI 10.1007/s00382-016-3315-0
   You QL, 2011, CLIM DYNAM, V36, P2399, DOI 10.1007/s00382-009-0735-0
   Zhao Y, 2021, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V126, DOI 10.1029/2021JD034788
   Zhou BT, 2014, J CLIMATE, V27, P6591, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00761.1
   Zhu SP, 2020, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V142, P613, DOI 10.1007/s00704-020-03345-7
   Zhu SP, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V160, P343, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02640-1
   Zscheischler J, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P469, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0156-3
NR 93
TC 32
Z9 34
U1 5
U2 57
PU IOP Publishing Ltd
PI BRISTOL
PA TEMPLE CIRCUS, TEMPLE WAY, BRISTOL BS1 6BE, ENGLAND
SN 1748-9326
J9 ENVIRON RES LETT
JI Environ. Res. Lett.
PD APR 1
PY 2022
VL 17
IS 4
AR 044006
DI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac48b6
PG 12
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA ZP3TU
UT WOS:000766348800001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU He, YZ
   Li, WG
   Zhu, PP
   Wang, M
   Qiu, JY
   Sun, HQ
   Zhang, RZ
   Liu, P
   Ling, LL
   Fu, XZ
   Chun, CP
   Cao, L
   Peng, LZ
AF He, Yizhong
   Li, Wenguang
   Zhu, Panpan
   Wang, Min
   Qiu, Jieya
   Sun, Haoqian
   Zhang, Ruizhi
   Liu, Ping
   Ling, Lili
   Fu, Xingzheng
   Chun, Changpin
   Cao, Li
   Peng, Liangzhi
TI Comparison between the vegetative and fruit characteristics of 'Orah'
   (Citrus reticulata Blanco) mandarin under different climatic conditions
SO SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
LA English
DT Article
DE Citrus; Climatic adaptability; Fruit quality; Morphological analysis;
   Metabolic analysis
ID QUALITY; YIELD; ACCUMULATION; TEMPERATURE
AB There is little information on the impact of agrometeorological factors on late-maturing citrus varieties. Here, several indices of the agronomic and physiological quality of 'Orah' mandarin fruit during three consecutive years were studied along with the metabolic traits under different climatic conditions. The average yield was high in the dry-hot valleys. However, the yield and yield efficiency were the lowest in areas with humid-sparse sunlight. The fruit in the dry-hot valleys and south subtropical regions were large and had seed number beyond 15.38, while the fruit in areas with humid-sparse sunlight were reddish and had few seeds. A statistical analysis of the total soluble solids (TSS) within three years showed that the fruit with highest amounts were in the mid subtropical regions (> 14.03%), followed by the dry-hot valleys. The fruit of tropical rainforest areas (titratable acid > 0.67%) were considered to contain the highest percentage of acid. A metabolic analysis showed that the contents of several metabolites, such as malic acid and proline, varied noticeably across different climatic regions. Correlation and factor analyses of the agronomic, physiological and metabolic indices with meteorological parameters revealed that the fruit yield and quality in the dry-hot valleys were superior to those observed in other regions and that temperature, in particular at the degreening and overwintering stages, along with the hours of sunshine significantly resulted in a considerable degree of variation in the indicators of fruit heterogeneity, such as weight, TSS, malic acid and proline.
C1 [He, Yizhong; Li, Wenguang; Zhu, Panpan; Wang, Min; Qiu, Jieya; Ling, Lili; Fu, Xingzheng; Chun, Changpin; Cao, Li; Peng, Liangzhi] Southwest Univ, Citrus Res Inst, Natl Citrus Engn Res Ctr, Chongqing 400712, Peoples R China.
   [Sun, Haoqian] Southwest Univ, Coll Hort & Forestry, Chongqing 400700, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Ruizhi] Southwest Univ, Coll Pharmaceut Sci & Chinese Med, Chongqing 400700, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Ping] Guangxi Acad specialty crops, Guilin 541004, Peoples R China.
C3 Southwest University - China; Southwest University - China; Southwest
   University - China
RP Peng, LZ (corresponding author), Southwest Univ, Citrus Res Inst, Natl Citrus Engn Res Ctr, Chongqing 400712, Peoples R China.
EM pengliangzhi@cric.cn
FU National Natural Science Foun-dation of China [31902084, 32172510];
   National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFD1000102,
   2017YFD0202006]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
   of China [SWU119072, XDJK2019C054]; China Agriculture Research System of
   MOFand MARA
FX This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foun-dation
   of China (Grant no. 31902084 and 32172510) , the National Key Research
   and Development Program of China (Grant no. 2020YFD1000102 and
   2017YFD0202006) , the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central
   Universities of China (Grant no. SWU119072 and XDJK2019C054) , and China
   Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA.
CR Albertini MV, 2006, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V54, P8335, DOI 10.1021/jf061648j
   Alva AK, 2006, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V109, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.04.011
   [Anonymous], 2016, INT J CLIMATOL, DOI DOI 10.1002/joc.4325
   Batista-Silva W, 2019, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V42, P1630, DOI 10.1111/pce.13518
   Ben-Mechlia N., 1989, International Journal of Biometeorology, V33, P36, DOI 10.1007/BF01045896
   Cantuarias-Avilés T, 2010, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V123, P318, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.09.020
   Chen Hong Chen Hong, 2017, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, V33, P25, DOI 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.14.004
   Cheng S., 1988, FRUIT METEOROLOGY, P237
   Crimmins TM, 2008, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V52, P353, DOI 10.1007/s00484-007-0130-7
   Deng X.X., 2013, CITRUS
   Ding YD, 2015, PLANT PHYSIOL, V168, P357, DOI 10.1104/pp.114.255711
   Duan Hai-lai, 2010, Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao, V21, P1915
   Etienne A, 2013, J EXP BOT, V64, P1451, DOI 10.1093/jxb/ert035
   García MR, 2000, THEOR APPL GENET, V101, P487, DOI 10.1007/s001220051507
   Gong RongGao Gong RongGao, 2004, Acta Horticulturae Sinica, V31, P719
   Gullo G, 2020, EUR J AGRON, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2020.126071
   He YZ, 2019, FOOD CHEM, V292, P314, DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.04.009
   Henao-Rojas Juan Camilo, 2019, Rev. Ceres, V66, P341, DOI [10.1590/0034-737X201966050003, 10.1590/0034-737x201966050003]
   Hussain SB, 2017, FRUITS, V72, P341, DOI 10.17660/th2017/72.6.2
   Jiang D, 2011, South China Fruits, V40, P33, DOI [10.13938/j.issn.1007-1431.2011.05.024, DOI 10.13938/J.ISSN.1007-1431.2011.05.024]
   Lin Q, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0156703
   Liu YongZhong Liu YongZhong, 2004, Acta Horticulturae Sinica, V31, P584
   Magwaza LS, 2017, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V216, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.12.021
   Manera FJ, 2012, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V145, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2012.07.021
   MARANA C, 1990, GENE, V88, P167, DOI 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90028-P
   Mitra SK, 2018, ACTA HORTIC, V1216, P1, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1216.1
   Mukai H, 2000, J JPN SOC HORTIC SCI, V69, P624, DOI 10.2503/jjshs.69.624
   Nawaz R, 2020, J SCI FOOD AGR, V100, P2688, DOI 10.1002/jsfa.10300
   Nawaz R, 2020, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V260, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108868
   Ponting JD, 1943, IND ENG CHEM, V15, P389
   Quaggio JA, 2002, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V96, P151, DOI 10.1016/S0304-4238(02)00121-8
   Rankovic-Vasic Z, 2015, ACTA HORTIC, V1082, P389, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1082.54
   Reig G, 2015, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V190, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.04.019
   Reuther W., 1980, Proceedings of the Tropical Region, American Society for Horticultural Science, V24, P15
   Richardson AC, 1997, J HORTIC SCI, V72, P919, DOI 10.1080/14620316.1997.11515584
   Saini MK, 2019, J FOOD COMPOS ANAL, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.jfca.2019.103278
   Sherman WB, 2003, ACTA HORTIC, P411, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.622.43
   Subedi S., 2019, Adv Plants Agric Res, V9, P141, DOI [10.15406/apar.2019.09.00426, DOI 10.15406/APAR.2019.09.00426]
   [唐玉琴 Tang Yuqin], 2013, [园艺学报, Acta Horticulturae Sinica], V40, P623
   Vardi A, 2008, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V133, P117, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.133.1.117
   Vicent A, 2008, PHYTOPARASITICA, V36, P7, DOI 10.1007/BF02980742
   Yao RY, 2018, FRONT PHARMACOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fphar.2018.00151
   Zhang JP, 2002, J ARID ENVIRON, V51, P153, DOI 10.1006/jare.2001.0851
   Zhang Q, 2018, J INTEGR AGR, V17, P1338, DOI 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61826-4
   Zheng CS, 2015, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V191, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.05.008
NR 45
TC 8
Z9 10
U1 3
U2 48
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0304-4238
EI 1879-1018
J9 SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM
JI Sci. Hortic.
PD JUN 27
PY 2022
VL 300
AR 111064
DI 10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111064
EA MAR 2022
PG 11
WC Horticulture
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA 1F0KU
UT WOS:000794866900004
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sein, ZMM
   Zhi, XF
   Ullah, I
   Azam, K
   Ngoma, H
   Saleem, F
   Xing, Y
   Iyakaremye, V
   Syed, S
   Hina, S
   Nkunzimana, A
AF Sein, Zin Mie Mie
   Zhi, Xiefei
   Ullah, Irfan
   Azam, Kamran
   Ngoma, Hamida
   Saleem, Farhan
   Xing, Yun
   Iyakaremye, Vedaste
   Syed, Sidra
   Hina, Saadia
   Nkunzimana, Athanase
TI Recent variability of sub-seasonal monsoon precipitation and its
   potential drivers in Myanmar using in-situ observation during 1981-2020
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Mann-Kendall (MK) test; Myanmar; precipitation; summer monsoon
ID ASIAN WINTER MONSOON; CLIMATE-CHANGE; EXTREME PRECIPITATION; SUMMER
   MONSOON; INDIAN MONSOON; DROUGHT; REGION; ENSO; PACIFIC; IMPACTS
AB The present study assessed the spatiotemporal variation of summer monsoon precipitation and its potential drivers in Myanmar, utilizing monthly precipitation data from forty-six (46) synoptic meteorological stations spanning 1981-2020. The nonparametric statistical Mann-Kendall (MK), Sequential Mann-Kendall (SQMK) test, Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF), and Probability Distribution Function (PDF) were used to determine the spatiotemporal monsoon precipitation trends and variability over the study period. The results show that higher precipitation occurs during June, July and August (peak monsoon period), while low precipitation was detected in May (onset month), September and October (withdrawal monsoon period), respectively. Moreover, abrupt change in precipitation is observed after 1990 with a significant (95% confidence level) increasing trend from 2000 to 2020. Decadal precipitation experienced the highest fluctuation during 2011-2020, a positive shift and increased frequency in recent decades. The spatial trends for monthly and seasonal precipitation vary from station to station and region to region due to a fluctuated shift of climatic dynamics. During dry conditions, less cloud liquid water suppressed relative humidity and high air temperature were exhibited, thus implying less precipitation in the region. However, the wet years revealed strong moisture/water vapour into the inland regions from the ocean, increased relative humidity, and suppressed air temperature. In addition, no significant relationship was found between El-Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO), Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD), and monsoon onset timing with precipitation variability over Myanmar. This study provides essential information on manageable climate adaptation, mitigation and weather forecasting strategies in Myanmar.
C1 [Sein, Zin Mie Mie] Wuxi Univ, Coll Int Students, Wuxi, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
   [Zhi, Xiefei; Ullah, Irfan; Iyakaremye, Vedaste] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Atmospher Sci, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China.
   [Zhi, Xiefei] Weather Online Inst Meteorol Applicat, Wuxi, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
   [Ullah, Irfan; Xing, Yun; Iyakaremye, Vedaste] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast & Evaluat Meteoro, Joint Int Res Lab Climate & Environm Change, Key Lab Meteorol Disaster,Minist Educ, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
   [Azam, Kamran] Univ Haripur, Dept Management Sci, Haripur, Khyber Pakhtunk, Pakistan.
   [Ngoma, Hamida] Univ Connecticut, Dept Geosci, Storrs, CT USA.
   [Saleem, Farhan] Chinese Acad Sci, Int Ctr Climate & Environm Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Saleem, Farhan; Hina, Saadia] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Earth & Planetary Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Xing, Yun] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Hydrol & Water Resources, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
   [Syed, Sidra] Univ Peshawar, Inst Peace & Conflicts Studies, Peshawar, Pakistan.
   [Nkunzimana, Athanase] Univ Burundi, Dept Geog, Bujumbura, Burundi.
C3 Wuxi University; Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology;
   Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology; University of
   Connecticut; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Atmospheric
   Physics, CAS; Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy
   of Sciences, CAS; Nanjing University of Information Science &
   Technology; University of Peshawar
RP Ullah, I (corresponding author), Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Atmospher Sci, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China.
EM irfan.marwat@nuist.edu.cn
RI Iyakaremye, Vedaste/AGK-7642-2022; Ullah, Irfan/AEN-0985-2022;
   Nkunzimana, Athanase/KBB-5299-2024; Ngoma, Hamida/ABF-1057-2021; Hina,
   Saadia/JMQ-9491-2023; Zhi, Xiefei/AGU-6880-2022; Azam, Dr
   Kamran/D-7431-2019
OI Nadoya, Hamida Ngoma/0000-0002-3690-244X; Zhi,
   Xiefei/0000-0003-4414-0497; Syed, Sidra/0000-0002-3491-4826; IYAKAREMYE,
   Vedaste/0000-0001-6791-1464; Hina, Saadia/0000-0002-6203-9694; Ullah,
   Irfan/0000-0002-6913-7481; Azam, Dr Kamran/0000-0002-5188-8914
FU National (Key) Basic R&D Program of China [2012CB955204]
FX National (Key) Basic R&D Program of China, Grant/Award Number:
   2012CB955204
CR Ahmed K, 2018, ATMOS RES, V214, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.08.020
   Akhtar IU, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-54872-x
   Ali SHB, 2019, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V191, DOI 10.1007/s10661-018-7184-3
   Altin TB, 2017, ATMOS RES, V196, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.06.017
   Annamalai H, 2007, J CLIMATE, V20, P1071, DOI [10.1175/JCLI4035.1, 10.1175/JCL14035.1]
   [Anonymous], 2020, B AM METEOROL SOC, V101, P767, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0037.1
   Ashok K, 2007, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V112, DOI 10.1029/2006JC003798
   BEVAN JM, 1971, J ROY STAT SOC D-STA, V20, P74
   Bibi A, 2020, EARTH SPACE SCI, V7, DOI 10.1029/2019EA001022
   Burki T, 2015, LANCET, V386, P843, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00004-5
   Chen FH, 2019, EARTH-SCI REV, V192, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.03.005
   Das J, 2020, J HYDROL, V580, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124356
   Eckstein D., 2020, GLOBAL CLIMATE RISK, V9, P28
   Farooqi A., 2005, Pakistan J. Meteorol, V2, P11
   Gao T, 2017, ATMOS RES, V197, P379, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.07.017
   Ge F, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abd7ad
   Gong HN, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abd586
   Gong HN, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P10874, DOI 10.1029/2019GL084154
   Gong HN, 2018, J CLIMATE, V31, P9001, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0136.1
   Gong HN, 2018, J CLIMATE, V31, P6857, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0541.1
   Gong HA, 2014, J CLIMATE, V27, P1659, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00039.1
   Hamed KH, 1998, J HYDROL, V204, P182, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00125-X
   Han JY, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V256, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.03.002
   Hannachi A, 2007, INT J CLIMATOL, V27, P1119, DOI 10.1002/joc.1499
   Hemlata P., 2021, APPL ECOLOGY ENV SCI, V9, P123, DOI [10.12691/aees-9-2-1, DOI 10.12691/AEES-9-2-1]
   Hersbach H., 2019, ECMWF Newsl, V159, P17, DOI DOI 10.21957/VF291HEHD7
   Hina S, 2021, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V12, P1638, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2021.1938703
   Huo YL, 2020, J CLIMATE, V33, P2311, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0268.1
   Hussain M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V200, P791, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.272
   Iyakaremye V, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V790, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148162
   Iyakaremye V, 2021, ATMOS RES, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105512
   Iyakaremye V, 2021, INT J CLIMATOL, V41, P1506, DOI 10.1002/joc.6868
   Jiang WP, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P109, DOI [10.1175/jcli-d-16-0365.1, 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0365.1]
   Joshi S, 2018, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V131, P1449, DOI 10.1007/s00704-017-2045-5
   Kreft S., 2017, THINK TANK RES, V13, P76
   Kreft S., 2013, GLOBAL CLIMATE RISK, V11, P28
   Kumar KK, 2006, SCIENCE, V314, P115, DOI 10.1126/science.1131152
   Kumar KK, 1999, SCIENCE, V284, P2156, DOI 10.1126/science.284.5423.2156
   LATIF M, 1994, SCIENCE, V266, P634, DOI 10.1126/science.266.5185.634
   Lawrence MG, 2005, B AM METEOROL SOC, V86, P225, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-86-2-225
   Liu B, 2018, CLIM DYNAM, V51, P1671, DOI 10.1007/s00382-017-3976-3
   Liu MY, 2021, ECOHYDROLOGY, V14, DOI 10.1002/eco.2323
   Ma SM, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P6543, DOI [10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0636.1, 10.1175/jcli-d-16-0636.1]
   Mann HB, 1945, ECONOMETRICA, V13, P245, DOI 10.2307/1907187
   MARDIA KV, 1988, J MULTIVARIATE ANAL, V24, P265, DOI 10.1016/0047-259X(88)90040-1
   Sein ZMM, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13050729
   Sein ZMM, 2021, CLIMATE, V9, DOI 10.3390/cli9020035
   Mon T.L., 2020, Advances in Entomology, V8, P107, DOI [10, DOI 10.4236/AE.2020.83009, 10.4236/ae.2020.83008]
   Musonda B, 2020, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/atmos11121268
   Olauson J, 2018, RENEW ENERG, V126, P322, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.056
   Preethi B, 2019, CLIM DYNAM, V53, P1937, DOI 10.1007/s00382-019-04752-x
   Ren YY, 2017, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V8, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2017.08.001
   Saleem F, 2021, ATMOS RES, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105407
   Sein ZMM, 2015, METEOROL ATMOS PHYS, V127, P587, DOI 10.1007/s00703-015-0386-0
   Sein ZMM, 2016, ARAB J GEOSCI, V9, DOI 10.1007/s12517-016-2502-y
   Shahzaman M, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13163294
   Shahzaman M, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13112059
   Sheikh MM, 2015, INT J CLIMATOL, V35, P1625, DOI 10.1002/joc.4081
   Shiu CJ, 2012, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V39, DOI 10.1029/2012GL052762
   Singh P, 2014, EUR J AGRON, V52, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2013.09.018
   Stocker BD, 2019, NAT GEOSCI, V12, P264, DOI 10.1038/s41561-019-0318-6
   Suman M, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-63571-x
   Toreti A, 2011, INT J CLIMATOL, V31, P630, DOI 10.1002/joc.2088
   Ullah I., 2021, INT J CLIMATOL
   Ullah I, 2021, INT J CLIMATOL, V41, P4437, DOI 10.1002/joc.7063
   Vergopolan N, 2020, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V242, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111740
   Victor DG, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE, P111
   Vinayachandran P., 2009, Current trends in science, P569
   WALSH JE, 1980, MON WEATHER REV, V108, P615, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<0615:AQAOMA>2.0.CO;2
   Wang B, 2009, J CLIMATE, V22, P3303, DOI 10.1175/2008JCLI2675.1
   Wang F, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11050485
   Wang HJ, 2014, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V28, P443, DOI 10.1007/s00477-013-0763-5
   Wang L, 2014, J CLIMATE, V27, P2361, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00086.1
   Wang L, 2010, ADV ATMOS SCI, V27, P855, DOI 10.1007/s00376-009-9094-3
   Wang R, 2019, ATMOS RES, V222, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.02.008
   Wang YM, 2009, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V114, DOI 10.1029/2008JD010929
   Watterson IG, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V113, DOI 10.1029/2007JD009254
   WEBSTER PJ, 1992, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V118, P877, DOI 10.1002/qj.49711850705
   Wu GX, 2012, SCI REP-UK, V2, DOI 10.1038/srep00404
   Yan X, 2021, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V145, P363, DOI 10.1007/s00704-021-03613-0
   Yu HL, 2015, J HYDROL, V525, P585, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.057
   Zehra S., 2016, J GEOSCI ENV PROT, V4, P54, DOI [10.4236/gep.2016.44008, DOI 10.4236/GEP.2016.44008]
   Zhang Y, 2019, J HYDROL, V579, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124230
   Zhao GJ, 2015, J CLIMATE, V28, P9977, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0272.1
   Zhong RD, 2018, ATMOS RES, V214, P296, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.08.008
NR 85
TC 33
Z9 33
U1 1
U2 31
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0899-8418
EI 1097-0088
J9 INT J CLIMATOL
JI Int. J. Climatol.
PD MAY
PY 2022
VL 42
IS 6
BP 3341
EP 3359
DI 10.1002/joc.7419
EA OCT 2021
PG 19
WC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA 0Y4AB
UT WOS:000712138200001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Akyildiz, G
   Guven, E
   Tufek, H
   Bente, D
   Vatansever, Z
   Kar, S
AF Akyildiz, Gurkan
   Guven, Esin
   Tufek, Hakan
   Bente, Dennis
   Vatansever, Zati
   Kar, Sirri
TI Monthly dynamics of the cold-adapted one-host biological north form of
   <i>Hyalomma scupense </i>under the influence of the warm summer subtype
   of the Mediterranean climate in Turkey
SO PARASITOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Hyalomma scupense; Cattle; One-host behavior; Winter activity;
   Mediterranean climate; Turkish Thrace
ID ACARI IXODIDAE; TICKS; AFRICA; EUROPE; ASIA
AB The one-host biological north form / ecotype of Hyalomma scupense Schulze, 1919 (Acari, Ixodidae) is reported for the first time in Turkey herein. Following the first detection of the tick, a longitudinal field study was carried out to fill gaps in the data concerning its biological features. This study also aimed to determine how the monthly activation dynamics of this relatively cold climate-adapted species is characterized under the influence of the warm summer subtype of the Mediterranean climate. During this study, which was carried out on a monthly basis in 2014, H. scupense was found on cattle from 5 out of 18 villages screened in Thrace (the European part of Turkey). The field study revealed that i) this north ecotype of H. scupense exhibits winter one-host behavior beginning in October (with larval stages) and ending in April (with engorged adults); ii) engorged females detach from the cattle, drop on the floors of barns during night and accumulate on piled bedding contaminated with slurry manure; iii) in the late spring, engorged females lay eggs, and larvae hatch in the same area; and iv) larvae become active in autumn as the weather grows cooler. The results indicated that although one-host H. scupense is known to be distinctly adapted to cold conditions, it can also be effectively established in relatively temperate regions and complete its life cycle with some modifications in the timing of its monthly activation dynamics.
C1 [Akyildiz, Gurkan; Kar, Sirri] Tekirdag Namik Kemal Univ, Dept Biol, TR-59030 Tekirdag, Turkey.
   [Guven, Esin] Ataturk Univ, Fac Vet, Dept Parasitol, Erzurum, Turkey.
   [Tufek, Hakan] Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit Univ, Caycuma Vocat High Sch, Zonguldak, Turkey.
   [Bente, Dennis] Univ Texas Med Branch, Inst Human Infect & Immun, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Galveston Natl Lab, Galveston, TX 77555 USA.
   [Vatansever, Zati] Kafkas Univ, Fac Vet, Dept Parasitol, Kars, Turkey.
C3 Namik Kemal University; Ataturk University; Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit
   University; University of Texas System; University of Texas Medical
   Branch Galveston; Kafkas University
RP Kar, S (corresponding author), Tekirdag Namik Kemal Univ, Dept Biol, TR-59030 Tekirdag, Turkey.
EM hakan.tufek@beun.edu.tr; dabente@utmb.edu; sirrikar@yahoo.com
RI Akyildiz, Gurkan/AAE-8609-2019; vatansever, zati/A-2344-2016
OI Akyildiz, Gurkan/0000-0002-8610-5174; tufek, hakan/0000-0002-3601-6317;
   vatansever, zati/0000-0003-3460-3849
FU EU [FP7-261504]
FX This study was funded by EU Grant FP7-261504. The contents of this
   publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not
   neces-sarily reflect the views of the European Commission.
CR Alizon S, 2009, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V22, P245, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01658.x
   [Anonymous], 2017, TICKS EUROPE N AFRIC
   Apanaskevich DA, 2010, FOLIA PARASIT, V57, P69, DOI 10.14411/fp.2010.009
   Aydin L, 2007, PARASITOL RES, V101, pS163, DOI 10.1007/s00436-007-0694-5
   Balashov YS, 1997, ENTOMOL REV, V77, P625, DOI DOI 10.1515/VZOO-2016-0018
   Barker SC, 2008, TICKS: BIOLOGY, DISEASE AND CONTROL, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511551802.002
   BELOZEROV VN, 1976, 28M EZH CHTEN PAM NA, P53
   Binning SA, 2017, INTEGR COMP BIOL, V57, P267, DOI 10.1093/icb/icx024
   Estrada Pena A., 2004, GUIDE IDENTIFICATION
   Galuzo I.G, 1947, GENUS HYALOMMA, V2
   Gharbi M, 2014, PARASITE, V21, DOI 10.1051/parasite/2014002
   Guglielmone AA, 2009, EXP APPL ACAROL, V48, P311, DOI 10.1007/s10493-009-9246-2
   GUSALOVA N G, 1972, Doklady Akademii Nauk Tadzhikskoi SSR, V15, P69
   Hicks O, 2018, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V285, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2018.0489
   HOOGSTRAAL H, 1961, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V24, P197
   HOOGSTRAAL H, 1963, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V28, P235
   Hoogstraal H., 1956, BUR MED SURG US NAVY, VI, P1101
   Iqbal A, 2013, PARASITOL RES, V112, P535, DOI 10.1007/s00436-012-3164-7
   Kolonin GV., 2009, Fauna of ixodid ticks of the world
   Obenchain F.D., 1982, PHYSL TICKS, P469
   Öztürk MZ, 2017, J GEOGR-ISTANBUL, P17, DOI 10.26650/JGEOG295515
   Petney TN, 2011, PARASITOL RES MG, V2, P283, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21396-0_15
   Pomerantsev B.I., 1950, FAUNA SSSR PAUKOOBRA, V4
   Pontes GM, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-68884-5
   Rasulov I, 2007, PARASITOL RES, V101, pS183, DOI 10.1007/s00436-007-0691-8
   Rehman A, 2017, PARASITE VECTOR, V10, DOI 10.1186/s13071-017-2138-0
   Serdyukova GV, 1956, IXODID TICKS KEYS FA
NR 27
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 0
U2 1
PU ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
PI CLARE
PA ELSEVIER HOUSE, BROOKVALE PLAZA, EAST PARK SHANNON, CO, CLARE, 00000,
   IRELAND
SN 1383-5769
EI 1873-0329
J9 PARASITOL INT
JI Parasitol. Int.
PD DEC
PY 2021
VL 85
AR 102427
DI 10.1016/j.parint.2021.102427
EA AUG 2021
PG 7
WC Parasitology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Parasitology
GA WJ8IL
UT WOS:000709282100004
PM 34314861
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Kenner, A
   Skula, A
   Mankikar, D
   Zimmermann, I
   Nobles, E
   Menzo, J
   Flaherty, T
   Zerbo, R
AF Kenner, Alison
   Skula, Alexandra
   Mankikar, Deepa
   Zimmermann, Ian
   Nobles, Eliza
   Menzo, Julia
   Flaherty, Thomas
   Zerbo, Russell
TI The Climate-Ready Home: Teaching Climate Change in the Context of Asthma
   Management
SO ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
LA English
DT Article
DE asthma; climate change; community education; housing; air quality
ID HEALTH
AB More than 330 million people around the world suffer from asthma, a chronic respiratory disease that is produced by environmental conditions such as air pollution, mold, and seasonal change. In Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, high asthma prevalence rates and poor asthma control is attributed to urban air pollution and substandard housing, both of which will be made worse by climate change in the Mid-Atlantic region. Climate change will increase air pollution, worsen indoor environmental conditions, and bring more unpredictable weather, all of which will make asthma more difficult to manage. This article describes a public education project designed to teach vulnerable local communities about climate change and its impact on asthma management. The Climate Ready Philly project provided basic information on the mechanisms of global climate change, presented research on how climate change would impact the city of Philadelphia, and facilitated hands-on activities to help workshop participants learn what they could do to address climate change at home. Our workshops paired healthy homes and energy efficiency strategies, for example, to explore relationships between outdoor and indoor environments, as well as impacts on occupant health. By utilizing climate learning science, our workshops allowed participants to explore relationships between existing health and environmental conditions-such as asthma-and the anticipated impacts of climate change. Using surveys, interviews, and ethnographic data collection, we found that more resources are needed to repair housing infrastructure and help low-income community members access resources that can improve indoor air quality. We conclude by highlighting the need for climate adaptation programs that provide support for housing, in addition to other public infrastructures, which will be needed to reduce the burden of asthma in Philadelphia.
C1 [Kenner, Alison] Drexel Univ, Dept Polit, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
   [Kenner, Alison] Drexel Univ, Ctr Sci Technol & Soc, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
   [Skula, Alexandra] Philadelphia Dept Publ Hlth, Div Dis Control, Philadelphia, PA USA.
   [Mankikar, Deepa] Natl Nurse Led Care Consortium, Philadelphia, PA USA.
   [Zimmermann, Ian] Drexel Univ, Commun Culture & Media Program, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
   [Nobles, Eliza] Univ Penn, City Planning, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
   [Menzo, Julia] Liberty Lutheran, Community Outreach, Philadelphia, PA USA.
   [Flaherty, Thomas] Energy Coordinating Agcy, Dev & Mkt, Philadelphia, PA USA.
   [Zerbo, Russell] Clean Air Council, Philadelphia, PA USA.
C3 Drexel University; Drexel University; Drexel University; University of
   Pennsylvania
RP Kenner, A (corresponding author), Drexel Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
EM ali.kenner@gmail.com
OI Nobles, Eliza Catherine/0009-0005-1162-709X
CR Arlian LG, 2001, J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUN, V107, pS406, DOI 10.1067/mai.2001.113670
   Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, 2019, ASTHM CAP REP 2019 M
   Bryant-Stephens Tyra, 2009, Am J Public Health, V99 Suppl 3, pS657, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2009.165423
   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2017, MOST REC ASTHM STAT
   Checker M, 2011, CITY SOC, V23, P210, DOI 10.1111/j.1548-744X.2011.01063.x
   Chung KF, 2014, EUR RESPIR J, V43, P343, DOI 10.1183/09031936.00202013
   City of Philadelphia, 2017, GUIDE FLOODING PHILA
   Coulter L, 2019, FUTURES, V111, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2019.05.004
   Crimmins A., 2017, The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment
   Crimmins AllisonJ., 2016, IMPACTS CLIMATE CHAN
   Edwards GAS, 2017, URBAN STUD, V54, P1126, DOI 10.1177/0042098015617907
   Hammer Jason, 2019, PHILADELPHIA HEAT VU
   Kenner Alison., 2018, Breathtaking: Asthma Care in a Time of Climate Change
   Kramer Anna, 2018, OLD HOMES HIGH POVER
   Laker B., 2018, PHILADELPHIA INQUIRE
   Loftus Alex, 2019, EVERYDAY ENV CREATIN
   Marroni Steve, 2018, PENNLIVE
   Mudarri D, 2007, INDOOR AIR, V17, P226, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00474.x
   Muttarak R, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06476-190142
   Pollack CE, 2010, AM J PREV MED, V39, P515, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.002
   Poole JA, 2019, J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUN, V143, P1702, DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.02.018
   Rhodes T., 2002, International Journal of Drug Policy, V13, P85, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0955-3959(02)00007-5, DOI 10.1016/J.DRUGPO.2008.10.003, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-3959(02)00007-5]
   Schmidt CW, 2016, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V124, pA70, DOI 10.1289/ehp.124-A70
   Schulz AJ, 2013, HEALTH PLACE, V24, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.09.005
   Snyder S, 2014, GEOPHYS MONOGR SER, V203, P103
NR 25
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 0
U2 11
PU MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
PI NEW ROCHELLE
PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA
SN 1939-4071
EI 1937-5174
J9 ENVIRON JUSTICE
JI Environ. Justice
PD AUG 1
PY 2020
VL 13
IS 4
BP 101
EP 108
DI 10.1089/env.2019.0033
EA JUL 2020
PG 8
WC Environmental Studies
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA NA7AD
UT WOS:000558246400001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Cuevas, S
   Downs, SM
   Ghosh-Jerath, S
   Aafrin
   Shankar, B
AF Cuevas, Soledad
   Downs, Shauna M.
   Ghosh-Jerath, Suparna
   Aafrin
   Shankar, Bhavani
TI Analysing the policy space for the promotion of healthy, sustainable
   edible oil consumption in India
SO PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
LA English
DT Article
DE Fatty acids; Sustainable nutrition; Edible oils
ID NUTRITION TRANSITION; SATURATED FAT; AGRICULTURE; FOOD; MALNUTRITION;
   METAANALYSIS; CHOLESTEROL; BURDEN; TRENDS
AB Objective: To identify opportunities and challenges for the promotion of healthy, sustainable oil consumption in India. Design: We use a framework for policy space analysis which distinguishes between policy context, process and characteristics. Setting: We focus on the Indian edible oils sector and on factors shaping the policy space at a national level. Participants: The study is based on the analysis of policy documents and semi-structured interviews with key experts and stakeholders in the edible oils sector. Results: We find opportunities associated with the emergence of multisectoral policy frameworks for climate adaptation and non-communicable disease (NCD) prevention at a national level which explicitly include the oils sector, the existence of structures for sectoral policy coordination, some supportive factors for the translation of nutrition evidence into practice, and the possibility of integrating nutrition-sensitive approaches within current state-led agricultural interventions. However, the trade-offs perceived across sustainability, NCD prevention and food security objectives in the vegetable oils sector are considered a barrier for policy influence and implementation. Sustainability and nutrition advocates tend to focus on different segments of the value chain, missing potential synergies. Moreover, policy priorities are dominated by historical concerns for food security, understood as energy provision, as well as economic and strategic priorities. Conclusions: Systematic efforts towards identifying synergistic approaches, from agricultural production to distribution of edible oils, as well as increased involvement of nutrition advocates with upstream policies in the oils sector, could increase policy influence for advocates of both nutrition and sustainability.
C1 [Cuevas, Soledad; Shankar, Bhavani] SOAS Univ London, Thornhaugh St,Russell Sq, London WC1H OXG, England.
   [Cuevas, Soledad; Shankar, Bhavani] Leverhulme Ctr Integrat Res Agr & Hlth, London, England.
   [Downs, Shauna M.] Rutgers Sch Publ Hlth, Newark, NJ USA.
   [Ghosh-Jerath, Suparna; Aafrin] Indian Inst Publ Hlth Delhi, Publ Hlth Fdn India, Gurgaon, India.
C3 Rutgers University System; Public Health Foundation of India
RP Cuevas, S (corresponding author), SOAS Univ London, Thornhaugh St,Russell Sq, London WC1H OXG, England.; Cuevas, S (corresponding author), Leverhulme Ctr Integrat Res Agr & Hlth, London, England.
EM soledad.cuevas@soas.ac.uk
RI Ghosh'Jerath, Suparna/KII-9353-2024
OI Downs, Shauna/0000-0003-2161-3343; Cuevas Garcia-Dorado,
   Soledad/0000-0002-4897-5240; Shankar, Bhavani/0000-0001-8102-321X;
   Ghosh-Jerath, Suparna/0000-0002-2229-4455
FU Wellcome Trust under its 'Our Planet, Our Health' initiative
   [103905/Z/14/Z]; Wellcome Trust [103905/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome
   Trust
FX This research was funded by a grant from the Wellcome Trust (grant
   number 103905/Z/14/Z) under its 'Our Planet, Our Health' initiative. The
   Wellcome Trust had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this
   article.
CR Agus F., 2013, Historical CO2 emissions from land use and land use change from the oil palm industry in Indonesia, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea
   [Anonymous], 2015, FOOD WARS GLOBAL BAT
   Bachani D, 2017, NATL MULTISECTORAL A
   Basu S, 2013, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V347, DOI 10.1136/bmj.f6048
   Bowen GA, 2009, QUAL RES J, V9, P27, DOI 10.3316/QRJ0902027
   Centre for Responsible Business, 2014, RESP PRACT IND PALM
   Chang HJ, 2009, J PEASANT STUD, V36, P477, DOI 10.1080/03066150903142741
   Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices Department for Cooperation and Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Ministry of Agriculture Government of India, 2012, PRIC POL COPR 2013 S
   Department of Agriculture and Cooperation Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Government of India, 2014, NAT MISS SUST AGR OP
   Department of Food and Public Distribution Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution Government of India, 2016, ANN REP 2015 16
   Department of Food and Public Distribution Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution Government of India, 2010, ANN REP 2009 10
   Department of Food and Public Distribution Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution Government of India, 2015, ANN REP 2014 15
   Department of Food and Public Distribution Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution Government of India, 2011, ANN REP 2010 11
   Department of Food and Public Distribution Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution Government of India, 2013, ANN REP 2012 13
   Department of Food and Public Distribution Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution Government of India, 2009, ANN REP 2008 09
   Department of Food and Public Distribution Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution Government of India, 2014, ANN REP 2013 14
   Department of Food and Public Distribution Ministry of Consumer Affairs Food and Public Distribution Government of India, 2012, ANN REP 2011 12
   Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion Ministry of Commerce and Industry Government of India, 2016, CONS FDI POL
   Director General of Foreign Trade Government of India, 2008, NOT 85 2007 DT 17 03
   Downs SM, 2015, ECOL FOOD NUTR, V54, P603, DOI 10.1080/03670244.2015.1017759
   Downs SM, 2015, HEALTH PROMOT INT, V30, P595, DOI 10.1093/heapro/dat094
   Downs SM, 2013, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1139
   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1993, PUBL DISTR SYST IND
   Food Safety and Standards Authority of India Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India, 2013, FOOD SAF STAND PACK
   Food Safety and Standards Authority of India Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India, 2011, FOOD SAF STAND PROH
   Food Safety and Standards Authority of India Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India, 2016, FSSAI ANN REP 2015 1
   Food Safety and Standards Authority of India Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India, 2016, FORT FOODS REG 2016
   Food Safety and Standards Authority of India Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India, 2011, FOOD SAF STAND PACK
   Francis S., 2011, Economic and Political Weekly, V46, P46
   Government of India Prime Minister's Council on Climate Change, 2008, NAT ACT PLAN CLIM CH
   Grant J., 2009, Estey Center Journal for International Law and Trade Policy, V10, P223
   Grindle M., 1991, Public Choices and Policy Change: The Political Economy of Reform in Developing Countries
   Hare M., 2002, INTEGR ASSESS, V3, P50, DOI [DOI 10.1076/IAIJ.3.1.50.7408, 10.1076/iaij.3.1.50.7408]
   Hensen S., 2008, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, V4, P63
   Hertel S, 2015, DEV CHANGE, V46, P72, DOI 10.1111/dech.12144
   HFSS Working Group Ministry of Women and Child Development Government of India, 2014, JUNK FOOD GUID DRAFT
   HFSS Working Group Ministry of Women and Child Development Government of India, 2015, REP WORK GROUP ADDR
   Jha Girish Kumar, 2012, Edible Oilseeds Supply and Demand Scenario in India: Implications for Policy
   Mall RK, 2006, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V78, P445, DOI 10.1007/s10584-005-9042-x
   Malterud K, 2016, QUAL HEALTH RES, V26, P1753, DOI 10.1177/1049732315617444
   Marshall MN, 1996, FAM PRACT, V13, P522, DOI 10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
   Meenakshi JV, 2016, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V47, P115, DOI 10.1111/agec.12304
   Mensink RP, 2003, AM J CLIN NUTR, V77, P1146, DOI 10.1093/ajcn/77.5.1146
   Micha R, 2010, LIPIDS, V45, P893, DOI 10.1007/s11745-010-3393-4
   Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Government of India, 2014, NAT MISS OILS OIL PA
   Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Government of India, 2015, ANN REP 2014 15
   Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Government of India, 2014, ANN REP 2013 14
   Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Government of India, 2017, ANN REP 2016 17
   Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Government of India, 2013, FORM PRIC FRESH FRUI
   Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Government of India, 2016, ANN REP 2015 16
   Ministry of Food Processing Industries Government of India, 2017, MIN FOOD PROC IND AN
   Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India & World Health Organization, 2016, INT CONS NAT MULT AC
   Ministry of Law and Justice Government of India, 2013, NAT FOOD SEC ACT
   Misra A, 2011, J DIABETES, V3, P278, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-0407.2011.00139.x
   Mozaffarian D, 2011, J AM DIET ASSOC, V111, P665, DOI 10.1016/j.jada.2011.03.030
   Nordlinger EricA., 1987, UNDERSTANDING POLITI, P353
   Pande S, 2016, CIVIL SOC INNOVATION
   Popkin B. M., 2003, Development Policy Review, V21, P581, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2003.00225.x
   Popkin BM, 2006, FOOD POLICY, V31, P554, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.02.008
   Press Information Bureau Government of India, 2017, CAB APPR MEAS INCR O
   Rasiah Rajah., 2006, Technology, Adaptation, and Exports: How Some Developing Countries Got It Right, P163
   Ritchie J., 1994, ANAL QUALITATIVE DAT
   Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, 2013, PRINC CRIT PROD SUST
   Schleifer P, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V16, P38, DOI 10.1162/GLEP_a_00335
   Shankar B, 2017, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V20, P1126, DOI [10.1017/S1368980016003037, 10.1017/s1368980016003037]
   Shankar B, 2013, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V347, DOI 10.1136/bmj.f6065
   Singh S., 2015, Development Paper
   Solidaridad, 2017, IND AD NAT FRAM SUST
   Sun Y, 2015, J NUTR, V145, P1549, DOI 10.3945/jn.115.210575
   SUTTON R., 1999, POLICY PROCESS OVERV
   Swanson KS, 2013, ADV NUTR, V4, P141, DOI 10.3945/an.112.003335
   Thow AM, 2016, FOOD NUTR BULL, V37, P261, DOI 10.1177/0379572116653863
   US Department of Agriculture, 2016, PROD SUPPL DISTR DAT
   Vepa S. S., 2004, FAO Food and Nutrition Paper, P215
   Wang DD, 2016, JAMA INTERN MED, V176, P1134, DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2417
NR 75
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 0
U2 11
PU CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
PI CAMBRIDGE
PA EDINBURGH BLDG, SHAFTESBURY RD, CB2 8RU CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND
SN 1368-9800
EI 1475-2727
J9 PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR
JI Public Health Nutr.
PD DEC
PY 2019
VL 22
IS 18
BP 3435
EP 3446
DI 10.1017/S1368980019001836
PG 12
WC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Nutrition & Dietetics
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Nutrition & Dietetics
GA JT9WP
UT WOS:000501332300015
PM 31383045
OA Green Accepted, Green Published, Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Nore, K
   Kraniotis, D
   Sortland, ML
AF Nore, Kristine
   Kraniotis, Dimitrios
   Sortland, May-Linn
BE Johansson, D
   Bagge, H
   Wahlstrom, A
TI Wood as an Exposed Building Material for Indoor Climate Adaptation
SO COLD CLIMATE HVAC 2018: SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS IN COLD CLIMATES
SE Springer Proceedings in Energy
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT 9th International Cold Climate Conference (HVAC)
CY MAR 12-15, 2018
CL Kiruna, SWEDEN
DE Wood; Moisture; Ventilation; Control; Indoor climate
ID MOISTURE-BUFFERING CAPACITY
AB Use of massive wood has increased during the last decade. The concept of massive wood, mainly as cross laminated timber elements (CLT), has become a popular building method for new constructions, both in public and private sector. Massive wood elements take advantage of wood as building material, also as an indoor climate buffer. Moholt 50 vertical bar 50 is a new student-housing project in Trondheim, Norway, which consists of five mass timber towers. Each of them with eight stories built in CLT on top of a concrete storey. Apart from the student homes, the buildings host facilities, such as activity center, kindergarten, commercial areas and a library, also built in CLT. This makes Moholt 50 vertical bar 50 a significant wooden living lab in Trondheim. The building technique follows the development from the first Norwegian CLT student housing built in As in 2012, and reproduced later on in similar patterns in other Norwegian cities, as Tromso, Haugesund, Drammen, Fredrikstad, Halden, Honefoss, Porsgrunn and Trondheim. Research on comfort and operation cost coupled to indoor surfaces are included in project Moholt 50 vertical bar 50. The towers are built according to Norwegian low energy standards. All surfaces are treated with water solvent varnish, apart from two stories in one of the Moholt timber towers. Four stories are instrumented to document the difference in the behavior of untreated and treated wooden surfaces. Measurements show a different indoor climate of the stories with untreated surfaces. The measurements presented give preliminary results of a measurement period which, when finished, will include one year of inhabited studios from the date of moving in.
C1 [Nore, Kristine; Sortland, May-Linn] Norwegian Inst Wood Technol, PO Box113 Blindern, N-0314 Oslo, Norway.
   [Kraniotis, Dimitrios] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, POB 4 St Olays Plass, N-0130 Oslo, Norway.
C3 Oslo Metropolitan University (OsloMet)
RP Nore, K (corresponding author), Norwegian Inst Wood Technol, PO Box113 Blindern, N-0314 Oslo, Norway.
EM kristine.nore@treteknisk.no
RI Nore, Kristine/HLH-6787-2023; Kraniotis, Dimitrios/J-4845-2019
OI Kraniotis, Dimitrios/0000-0003-1598-1633
FU Norwegian Research council; student housing organization in Trondheim
   (SiT)
FX The authors greatly acknowledge the student housing organization in
   Trondheim (SiT) for always supporting and helping the research in
   progress and the Norwegian Research council for supporting the
   contractor through Skattefunn to finance the research activity.
CR [Anonymous], 2014, SURV REP SURV INT TA
   [Anonymous], 2005, MOISTURE BUFFERING B
   ASHRAE, 2013, 552013 ASHRAE ANSI
   Hameury S, 2005, BUILD ENVIRON, V40, P1400, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.10.017
   Karagiozis A., 2001, PERF EXT ENV WHOL BU
   Kraniotis D, 2017, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V38, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.102
   Kraniotis D, 2016, J WOOD SCI, V62, P203, DOI 10.1007/s10086-015-1528-1
   Mendes N, 2003, ENERG BUILDINGS, V35, P631
   Nore K, 2015, ENRGY PROCED, V78, P1907, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.361
   Nore K., SCI TECHNOLOGY BUILT
   Ojanen, 2001, VTT PUBLICATIONS, P6
   Osanyintola OF, 2006, ENERG BUILDINGS, V38, P1270, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.026
   Rode C, 2008, J BUILD PHYS, V31, P333, DOI 10.1177/1744259108088960
   Schickhofer G., 2016, JOINT C COST ACT FP
   Woloszyn M, 2009, BUILD ENVIRON, V44, P515, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.04.017
NR 15
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 6
PU SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
PI CHAM
PA GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND
SN 2352-2534
BN 978-3-030-00662-4; 978-3-030-00661-7
J9 SPRING PR ENERG
PY 2019
BP 847
EP 856
DI 10.1007/978-3-030-00662-4_71
PG 10
WC Energy & Fuels
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Energy & Fuels
GA BR9HE
UT WOS:000675599300071
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Leal, L
   Talla, V
   Källman, T
   Friberg, M
   Wiklund, C
   Dinca, V
   Vila, R
   Backström, N
AF Leal, Luis
   Talla, Venkat
   Kallman, Thomas
   Friberg, Magne
   Wiklund, Christer
   Dinca, Vlad
   Vila, Roger
   Backstrom, Niclas
TI Gene expression profiling across ontogenetic stages in the wood white
   (<i>Leptidea sinapis</i>) reveals pathways linked to butterfly diapause
   regulation
SO MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE developmental plasticity; diapause; gene expression; hour-glass model;
   Lepidoptera; monoamine neurotransmitter
ID PHOTOPERIODIC TIME MEASUREMENT; FAT-BODY; CLIMATIC ADAPTATION;
   DROSOPHILA; RNA; INDUCTION; MELATONIN; METABOLISM; MECHANISMS;
   SPECIATION
AB In temperate latitudes, many insects enter diapause (dormancy) during the cold season, a period during which developmental processes come to a standstill. The wood white (Leptidea sinapis) is a butterfly species distributed across western Eurasia that shows photoperiod-induced diapause with variation in critical day-length across populations at different latitudes. We assembled transcriptomes and estimated gene expression levels at different developmental stages in experimentally induced directly developing and diapausing cohorts of a single Swedish population of L. sinapis to investigate the regulatory mechanisms underpinning diapause initiation. Different day lengths resulted in expression changes of developmental genes and affected the rate of accumulation of signal molecules, suggesting that diapause induction might be controlled by increased activity of monoamine neurotransmitters in larvae reared under short-day light conditions. Expression differences between light treatment groups of two monoamine regulator genes (DDC and ST) were observed already in instar III larvae. Once developmental pathways were irreversibly set at instar V, a handful of genes related to dopamine production were differentially expressed leading to a significant decrease in expression of global metabolic genes and increase in expression of genes related to fatty acid synthesis and sequestration. This is in line with a time-dependent (hour-glass) model of diapause regulation where a gradual shift in the concentration of monoamine neurotransmitters and their metabolites during development of larvae under short-day conditions leads to increased storage of fat, decreased energy expenditures, and ultimately developmental stasis at the pupal stage.
C1 [Leal, Luis; Talla, Venkat; Backstrom, Niclas] Uppsala Univ, Dept Evolutionary Biol, EBC, Uppsala, Sweden.
   [Leal, Luis] Uppsala Univ, Dept Plant Ecol & Evolut, EBC, Uppsala, Sweden.
   [Kallman, Thomas] Uppsala Biomed Ctr BMC, Dept Med Biochem & Microbiol, Uppsala, Sweden.
   [Friberg, Magne] Lund Univ, Biodivers Unit, Dept Biol, Lund, Sweden.
   [Wiklund, Christer] Stockholm Univ, Div Ecol, Dept Zool, Stockholm, Sweden.
   [Dinca, Vlad] Univ Oulu, Dept Ecol & Genet, Oulu, Finland.
   [Vila, Roger] Inst Biol Evolut CSIC UPF, Barcelona, Spain.
C3 Uppsala University; Uppsala University; Uppsala University; Lund
   University; Stockholm University; University of Oulu; Consejo Superior
   de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC); CSIC-UPF - Institut de Biologia
   Evolutiva (IBE)
RP Backström, N (corresponding author), Uppsala Univ, Dept Evolutionary Biol, EBC, Uppsala, Sweden.
EM niclas.backstrom@ebc.uu.se
RI Leal, J. Luis/LRT-3182-2024; Talla, Venkat/AAN-8807-2020; Dinca, Vlad
   Eugen/O-3879-2014; Vila, Roger/A-1817-2012
OI Dinca, Vlad Eugen/0000-0003-1791-2148; Leal, J. L./0000-0003-0731-7329;
   Backstrom, Niclas/0000-0002-0961-8427; Talla,
   Venkat/0000-0003-2653-6770; Vila, Roger/0000-0002-2447-4388
FU SciLife Sweden Biodiversity Program [Backstrom_2014]; Swedish Research
   Council (VR) [2013-4508]; Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
FX SciLife Sweden Biodiversity Program, Grant/Award Number: Backstrom_2014;
   Swedish Research Council (VR), Grant/Award Number: 2013-4508; Knut and
   Alice Wallenberg Foundation
CR Adamo SA, 2016, J EXP BIOL, V219, P706, DOI 10.1242/jeb.132936
   Alexa A, 2006, BIOINFORMATICS, V22, P1600, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl140
   Andrés F, 2012, NAT REV GENET, V13, P627, DOI 10.1038/nrg3291
   [Anonymous], F1000RESEARCH
   [Anonymous], 2016, Transcriptome Contig Nx and ExN50 stats
   Arrese EL, 2010, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V55, P207, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085356
   Asada N, 1999, BIOCHEM GENET, V37, P149, DOI 10.1023/A:1018730404305
   Bajgar A, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P4416, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1217060110
   BECK S.D., 1980, INSECT PHOTOPERIODIS, VSegunda
   Becker T, 2010, NATURE, V463, P369, DOI 10.1038/nature08698
   BENJAMINI Y, 1995, J R STAT SOC B, V57, P289, DOI 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
   Borycz J, 2008, J EXP BIOL, V211, P3454, DOI 10.1242/jeb.021162
   Bradshaw WE, 2001, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V98, P14509, DOI 10.1073/pnas.241391498
   Bradshaw WE, 2010, BMC BIOL, V8, DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-8-115
   Bradshaw WE, 2010, J BIOL RHYTHM, V25, P155, DOI 10.1177/0748730410365656
   Bray NL, 2016, NAT BIOTECHNOL, V34, P525, DOI 10.1038/nbt.3519
   Brody T, 2000, J CELL BIOL, V150, pF83, DOI 10.1083/jcb.150.2.F83
   Bunning E., 1936, Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft, V54, P590, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1438-8677.1937.TB01941.X
   Byers KJRP, 2017, MOL ECOL, V26, P277, DOI 10.1111/mec.13678
   Challis RJ, 2017, BIORXIV
   CHOMCZYNSKI P, 1995, BIOTECHNIQUES, V19, P942
   CHOMCZYNSKI P, 1987, ANAL BIOCHEM, V162, P156, DOI 10.1006/abio.1987.9999
   Cong Q, 2016, GENOME BIOL EVOL, V8, P915, DOI 10.1093/gbe/evw045
   CRAIG SP, 1988, CYTOGENET CELL GENET, V48, P48, DOI 10.1159/000132584
   Daimon T, 2012, PLOS GENET, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002486
   Dasmahapatra KK, 2012, NATURE, V487, P94, DOI 10.1038/nature11041
   David S, 2009, PHYSIOL ENTOMOL, V34, P301, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2009.00699.x
   Denlinger D.L., 2012, Insect Endocrinology, P430
   Denlinger DL, 2017, PHILOS T R SOC B, V372, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2016.0257
   Denlinger DL, 2014, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V59, P73, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162023
   Denlinger DL, 2002, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V47, P93, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145137
   Ellegren H, 2008, NATURE, V452, P169, DOI 10.1038/nature06737
   Emerson KJ, 2009, TRENDS GENET, V25, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2009.03.009
   Friberg M, 2008, EVOL ECOL, V22, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10682-007-9155-y
   Friberg M, 2011, OECOLOGIA, V165, P301, DOI 10.1007/s00442-010-1804-0
   Friberg M, 2010, ECOLOGY, V91, P15, DOI 10.1890/09-0328.1
   Goto SG, 2002, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V48, P803, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1910(02)00108-7
   Grabherr MG, 2011, NAT BIOTECHNOL, V29, P644, DOI 10.1038/nbt.1883
   Haas B., 2017, TRINITY DOCUMENTATIO
   Hahn DA, 2011, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V56, P103, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085436
   HARDIN PE, 1990, NATURE, V343, P536, DOI 10.1038/343536a0
   Haugen IMA, 2015, J ANIM ECOL, V84, P464, DOI 10.1111/1365-2656.12291
   Hirsh J, 2010, CURR BIOL, V20, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.037
   HOUK EJ, 1977, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V23, P1209, DOI 10.1016/0022-1910(77)90155-X
   Howard K, 1998, CURR BIOL, V8, pR415, DOI 10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70266-0
   Isabel G, 2001, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS A, V128, P117, DOI 10.1016/S1095-6433(00)00284-1
   ITOH MT, 1995, MOL CELL ENDOCRINOL, V115, P59, DOI 10.1016/0303-7207(95)03670-3
   Jindra M, 2013, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V58, P181, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153700
   Kivelä SM, 2015, EVOLUTION, V69, P2399, DOI 10.1111/evo.12734
   Kost'al V, 2000, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V46, P887, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1910(99)00195-X
   Kostál V, 2006, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V52, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2005.09.008
   Kostál V, 2011, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V57, P538, DOI 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.10.006
   Lampa S, 2013, GIGASCIENCE, V2, DOI 10.1186/2047-217X-2-9
   Lee KY, 2002, INSECT BIOCHEM MOLEC, V32, P1457, DOI 10.1016/S0965-1748(02)00066-8
   Leek JT, 2012, BIOINFORMATICS, V28, P882, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts034
   LEES AD, 1953, ANN APPL BIOL, V40, P487, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1953.tb02388.x
   LEES AD, 1973, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V19, P2279, DOI 10.1016/0022-1910(73)90237-0
   Lehmann P., 2018, J EXPT BIOL EARLY ON
   Li Y, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep35359
   Lindholm P, 2010, DEV NEUROBIOL, V70, P360, DOI 10.1002/dneu.20760
   LINN CE, 1995, J COMP PHYSIOL A, V176, P761, DOI 10.1007/BF00192624
   Liu W, 2016, INSECT BIOCHEM MOLEC, V74, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.ibmb.2016.05.004
   LIVINGSTONE MS, 1983, NATURE, V303, P67, DOI 10.1038/303067a0
   Love Michael I, 2015, F1000Res, V4, P1070, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.7035.1
   Love MI, 2014, GENOME BIOL, V15, DOI 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
   Merzendorfer H, 2003, J EXP BIOL, V206, P4393, DOI 10.1242/jeb.00709
   Meuti ME, 2013, INTEGR COMP BIOL, V53, P131, DOI 10.1093/icb/ict023
   Miller JR, 2010, GENOMICS, V95, P315, DOI 10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.03.001
   Nadeau NJ, 2010, TRENDS GENET, V26, P484, DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2010.08.004
   Noguchi H, 2001, EUR J BIOCHEM, V268, P774, DOI 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.01933.x
   Nowell RW, 2017, GIGASCIENCE, V6, DOI 10.1093/gigascience/gix035
   Pardo-Diaz C, 2015, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V6, P445, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12324
   Parisi F, 2013, DEV BIOL, V379, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.04.008
   Pavey SA, 2010, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1206, P110, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05765.x
   POWELL JR, 1983, GENETICS, V103, P675
   Prasai K, 2011, EVOL ECOL RES, V13, P295
   Ragland GJ, 2017, PHYSIOL ENTOMOL, V42, P246, DOI 10.1111/phen.12193
   Ragland GJ, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P14909, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1007075107
   Rahnenfuhrer J, 2016, topGO: Enrichment Analysis for Gene Ontology (R package version 2.50.0)
   Riddiford LM, 2012, GEN COMP ENDOCR, V179, P477, DOI 10.1016/j.ygcen.2012.06.001
   Roeder T, 2005, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V50, P447, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130404
   Sang TK, 2007, J NEUROSCI, V27, P981, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4810-06.2007
   Saunders DS, 2011, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V57, P557, DOI 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.01.013
   Saunders DS, 2012, PHYSIOL ENTOMOL, V37, P207, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2012.00837.x
   Saunders DS, 2004, PHYSIOL ENTOMOL, V29, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2004.0369.x
   Saunders DS., 2002, INSECT CLOCKS, V3rd edn
   Schmidt PS, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P16207, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0805485105
   Seppanen E. J., 1969, Suom. hyont. Aikak., V35, P129
   Shen Jinhui, 2016, F1000Res, V5, P2631, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.9765.1
   Sim C, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P6777, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0802067105
   Stuart AE, 2007, PROG NEUROBIOL, V82, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.03.006
   Sugumaran H, 2002, PIGM CELL RES, V15, P2, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0749.2002.00056.x
   Talla V, 2017, GENOME BIOL EVOL, V9, P2491, DOI 10.1093/gbe/evx163
   Tolman T., 1997, Butterflies of Britain and Europe
   Van Dyck H, 2015, OIKOS, V124, P54, DOI 10.1111/oik.02066
   Veerman A, 2001, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V47, P1097, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1910(01)00106-8
   Wang QS, 2015, ENTOMOL SCI, V18, P193, DOI 10.1111/ens.12099
   Wang QS, 2015, ENTOMOL SCI, V18, P74, DOI 10.1111/ens.12083
   Williams KD, 2006, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V103, P15911, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0604592103
   Xu WH, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P14687, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1212879109
   Young MW, 2001, NAT REV GENET, V2, P702, DOI 10.1038/35088576
   Zhao XQ, 2016, MOL BIOL EVOL, V33, P707, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msv263
   Zinke I, 2002, EMBO J, V21, P6162, DOI 10.1093/emboj/cdf600
NR 103
TC 16
Z9 16
U1 3
U2 44
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0962-1083
EI 1365-294X
J9 MOL ECOL
JI Mol. Ecol.
PD FEB
PY 2018
VL 27
IS 4
BP 935
EP 948
DI 10.1111/mec.14501
PG 14
WC Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Ecology; Evolutionary Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Environmental Sciences & Ecology;
   Evolutionary Biology
GA GB1FR
UT WOS:000428797100010
PM 29411442
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Prunier, J
   Caron, S
   Lamothe, M
   Blais, S
   Bousquet, J
   Isabel, N
   MacKay, J
AF Prunier, Julien
   Caron, Sebastien
   Lamothe, Manuel
   Blais, Sylvie
   Bousquet, Jean
   Isabel, Nathalie
   MacKay, John
TI Gene copy number variations in adaptive evolution: The genomic
   distribution of gene copy number variations revealed by genetic mapping
   and their adaptive role in an undomesticated species, white spruce
   (<i>Picea glauca</i>)
SO MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptive evolution; comparative genome hybridization on arrays; gene
   copy number variations; genetic mapping; genome architecture;
   gymnosperms
ID ARABIDOPSIS; REARRANGEMENTS; RESISTANCE; POLYMORPHISM; ADAPTATION;
   MECHANISMS; TOLERANCE; SELECTION; INSIGHTS; IMPACT
AB Gene copy number variation (CNV) has been associated with phenotypic variability in animals and plants, but a genomewide understanding of their impacts on phenotypes is largely restricted to human and agricultural systems. As such, CNVs have rarely been considered in investigations of the genomic architecture of adaptation in wild species. Here, we report on the genetic mapping of gene CNVs in white spruce, which lacks a contiguous assembly of its large genome (similar to 20 Gb), and their relationships with adaptive phenotypic variation. We detected 3,911 gene CNVs including de novo structural variations using comparative genome hybridization on arrays (aCGH) in a large progeny set. We inferred the heterozygosity at CNV loci within parents by comparing haploid and diploid tissues and genetically mapped 82 gene CNVs. Our analysis showed that CNVs were distributed over 10 linkage groups and identified four CNV hotspots that we predict to occur in other species of the Pinaceae. Significant relationships were found between 29 of the gene CNVs and adaptive traits based on regression analyses with timings of bud set and bud flush, and height growth, suggesting a role for CNVs in climate adaptation. The importance of CNVs in adaptive evolution of white spruce was also indicated by functional gene annotations and the clustering of 31% of the mapped adaptive gene CNVs in CNV hotspots. Taken together, these results illustrate the feasibility of studying CNVs in undomesticated species and represent a major step towards a better understanding of the roles of CNVs in adaptive evolution.
C1 [Prunier, Julien; Caron, Sebastien; Blais, Sylvie; Bousquet, Jean] Univ Laval, IBIS, Quebec City, PQ, Canada.
   [Prunier, Julien; Caron, Sebastien; Blais, Sylvie; Bousquet, Jean; MacKay, John] Univ Laval, Ctr Forest Res, Quebec City, PQ, Canada.
   [Lamothe, Manuel; Isabel, Nathalie] Nat Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Serv, Laurentian Forest Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada.
   [Lamothe, Manuel; Blais, Sylvie; Bousquet, Jean; Isabel, Nathalie; MacKay, John] Univ Laval, Canada Res Chair Forest Gen, Quebec City, PQ, Canada.
   [MacKay, John] Univ Oxford, Dept Plant Sci, Oxford, England.
C3 Laval University; Laval University; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian
   Forest Service; Laval University; University of Oxford
RP Prunier, J (corresponding author), Univ Laval, IBIS, Quebec City, PQ, Canada.
EM jprunier.1@gmail.com
RI Lamothe, Manuel/W-2848-2019; MacKay, John/M-6978-2014; Bousquet,
   Jean/O-4221-2019
OI Lamothe, Manuel/0000-0002-5947-533X
FU Genome Canada; Quebec Ministry the Economy, Science and Innovation;
   Genome Quebec for the SmarTForests Project
FX Genome Canada and Genome Quebec for the SmarTForests Project; Quebec
   Ministry the Economy, Science and Innovation
CR Bai ZT, 2016, BMC GENOMICS, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-2589-2
   Bedon F, 2010, J EXP BOT, V61, P3847, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erq196
   Belkhadir Y, 2004, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V7, P391, DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.05.009
   Beló A, 2010, THEOR APPL GENET, V120, P355, DOI 10.1007/s00122-009-1128-9
   Bigras F.J., 2001, Conifer cold hardiness
   Birol I, 2013, BIOINFORMATICS, V29, P1492, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt178
   Brewer C, 1999, AM J HUM GENET, V64, P1702, DOI 10.1086/302410
   Carter NP, 2007, NAT GENET, V39, pS16, DOI 10.1038/ng2028
   Carvalho B, 2004, J CLIN PATHOL, V57, P644, DOI 10.1136/jcp.2003.013029
   Clop A, 2012, ANIM GENET, V43, P503, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2012.02317.x
   Conrad DF, 2010, NATURE, V464, P704, DOI 10.1038/nature08516
   Cook DE, 2012, SCIENCE, V338, P1206, DOI 10.1126/science.1228746
   De La Torre AR, 2014, PLANT PHYSIOL, V166, P1724, DOI 10.1104/pp.114.248708
   DeBolt S, 2010, GENOME BIOL EVOL, V2, P441, DOI 10.1093/gbe/evq033
   Dumas L, 2007, GENOME RES, V17, P1266, DOI 10.1101/gr.6557307
   Endelman JB, 2014, BIOINFORMATICS, V30, P1623, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu091
   Fadista J, 2010, BMC GENOMICS, V11, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-11-284
   Fontanesi L, 2011, GENOMICS, V97, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.11.005
   Freeman JL, 2006, GENOME RES, V16, P949, DOI 10.1101/gr.3677206
   Gokcumen O, 2011, GENOME BIOL, V12, DOI 10.1186/gb-2011-12-5-r52
   GRATTAPAGLIA D, 1994, GENETICS, V137, P1121
   Gu Wenli, 2008, Pathogenetics, V1, P4, DOI 10.1186/1755-8417-1-4
   Hall D, 2016, TREE GENET GENOMES, V12, DOI 10.1007/s11295-016-1073-0
   Hastings PJ, 2009, NAT REV GENET, V10, P551, DOI 10.1038/nrg2593
   Howe GT, 2003, CAN J BOT, V81, P1247, DOI [10.1139/b03-141, 10.1139/B03-141]
   Iafrate AJ, 2004, NAT GENET, V36, P949, DOI 10.1038/ng1416
   Jaramillo-Correa JP, 2015, ADV BOT RES, V74, P265, DOI 10.1016/bs.abr.2015.04.003
   Lai CP, 2004, PLANT PHYSIOL, V134, P1586, DOI 10.1104/pp.103.037820
   Langlois-Meurinne M, 2005, PLANT PHYSIOL, V139, P1890, DOI 10.1104/pp.105.067223
   Lu PL, 2012, GENOME RES, V22, P508, DOI 10.1101/gr.127522.111
   Lupski JR, 2007, NAT GENET, V39, pS43, DOI 10.1038/ng2084
   Lupski JR, 2007, NEW ENGL J MED, V356, P1169, DOI 10.1056/NEJMcibr067658
   Lupski JR, 2005, PLOS GENET, V1, P627, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010049
   Mageroy MH, 2015, PLANT J, V81, P68, DOI 10.1111/tpj.12699
   Medina I, 2010, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V38, pW210, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkq388
   Meyers BC, 2003, PLANT CELL, V15, P809, DOI 10.1105/tpc.009308
   Muñoz-Amatriaín M, 2013, GENOME BIOL, V14, DOI 10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-r58
   Murray BG, 1998, ANN BOT-LONDON, V82, P3, DOI 10.1006/anbo.1998.0764
   Neale DB, 2014, GENOME BIOL, V15, DOI 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r59
   Nosil P, 2009, MOL ECOL, V18, P375, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03946.x
   Nystedt B, 2013, NATURE, V497, P579, DOI 10.1038/nature12211
   Pavy N, 2017, PLANT J, V90, P189, DOI 10.1111/tpj.13478
   Pavy N, 2012, BMC BIOL, V10, DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-10-84
   Pelgas B, 2011, BMC GENOMICS, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-12-145
   Perry GH, 2007, NAT GENET, V39, P1256, DOI 10.1038/ng2123
   Perry GH, 2006, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V103, P8006, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0602318103
   Pinosio S, 2016, MOL BIOL EVOL, V33, P2706, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msw161
   Prunier J, 2017, BMC GENOMICS, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-3458-8
   Redon R, 2006, NATURE, V444, P444, DOI 10.1038/nature05329
   Rigault P, 2011, PLANT PHYSIOL, V157, P14, DOI 10.1104/pp.111.179663
   Sebat J, 2004, SCIENCE, V305, P525, DOI 10.1126/science.1098918
   Sena JS, 2014, BMC PLANT BIOL, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-14-95
   Smyth GK, 2005, STAT BIOL HEALTH, P397, DOI 10.1007/0-387-29362-0_23
   Springer NM, 2009, PLOS GENET, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000734
   Storey JD, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P9440, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1530509100
   Sutton T, 2007, SCIENCE, V318, P1446, DOI 10.1126/science.1146853
   Swanson-Wagner RA, 2010, GENOME RES, V20, P1689, DOI 10.1101/gr.109165.110
   Van Ooijen JW., 2006, JoinMap 4, Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations
   Wang XF, 2010, BMC GENOMICS, V11, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-11-351
   Warren RL, 2015, PLANT J, V83, P189, DOI 10.1111/tpj.12886
   Williams EJB, 2004, GENOME RES, V14, P1060, DOI 10.1101/gr.2131104
   Yeaman S, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, pE1743, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1219381110
   Yu P, 2011, BMC GENOMICS, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-12-372
   Zmienko A, 2014, THEOR APPL GENET, V127, P1, DOI 10.1007/s00122-013-2177-7
NR 64
TC 16
Z9 18
U1 0
U2 25
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0962-1083
EI 1365-294X
J9 MOL ECOL
JI Mol. Ecol.
PD NOV
PY 2017
VL 26
IS 21
BP 5989
EP 6001
DI 10.1111/mec.14337
PG 13
WC Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Ecology; Evolutionary Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Environmental Sciences & Ecology;
   Evolutionary Biology
GA FM8TK
UT WOS:000415362500010
PM 28833771
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Yan, HY
   Mao, Y
   Yang, L
AF Yan, Haiyan
   Mao, Yan
   Yang, Liu
TI Thermal adaptive models in the residential buildings in different
   climate zones of Eastern China
SO ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
LA English
DT Article
DE Thermal adaptation; Natural ventilated buildings; Thermal adaptive
   model; The Eastern China
ID NATURAL VENTILATION; COMFORT MODEL; ENVIRONMENT; ADAPTATION; OFFICES;
   HOT; HARBIN; INDIA
AB Adaptive comfort standards have become the main stream comfort research and are now considered an optional choice of natural ventilated buildings in the international thermal comfort standards. However, the international adaptive models were not suitable to evaluate the thermal adaptation level of all the climates. To explore thermal adaptive ability and develop thermal comfort models in different climate zones, field studies on thermal comfort in 120 residential buildings in summer and winter have been conducted in 12 cities, representative of four climate zones in eastern China. Those data were gathered using instantaneous subjective questionnaire surveys and objective on-site measurements. The results showed that the predicted neutral temperatures based on MTS in winter in four climate zones were all lower than the predicted neutral temperatures based on PMV, and vice versa in summer. The clothing was mainly affected by the indoor temperature in the severe cold climate; however, it was affected by the outdoor temperature in the warmer climates. Clothing adjustment was more obvious in the warmer climate than in the colder climate. The warmer the climate, the smaller the yearly temperature difference, and the higher a sensitivity of the neutral temperature to outdoor temperature. The adaptive models in the hot summer and cold winter zone (HSCW) and hot summer and warmer winter zone (HSWW) can be used to predict the comfort temperatures of the natural ventilated buildings in the above two climate zones. Different climate zones should develop their own thermal adaptive models. These findings provide support to the climate adaptation theory and can serve as reference for the design of natural ventilated buildings. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Yan, Haiyan] Henan Polytech Univ, Engn Lab Ecol Architecture & Environm Henan Prov, Jiaozuo 454000, Peoples R China.
   [Yan, Haiyan; Mao, Yan] Henan Polytech Univ, Sch Architectural & Artist Design, Jiaozuo 454000, Peoples R China.
   [Yang, Liu] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Architecture, Xian 710055, Peoples R China.
C3 Henan Polytechnic University; Henan Polytechnic University; Xi'an
   University of Architecture & Technology
RP Yang, L (corresponding author), Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Architecture, Xian 710055, Peoples R China.
EM yangliu@xauat.edu.cn
RI yang, liu/GVU-8760-2022
OI Yan, Haiyan/0009-0000-8780-2601
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [51408198, 51408479,
   51325803]; Research Project of Science and Technology Department in
   Henan Province [162102310421]; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
   [2015M570818]
FX The work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (Project No. 51408198, 51408479 and 51325803), the Research
   Project of Science and Technology Department in Henan Province
   (162102310421), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
   (2015M570818).
CR [Anonymous], 50176 GBT MIN HOUS U
   [Anonymous], 15251 CEN EUR COMM S
   [Anonymous], 2013, ASHRAE Standard 55 - 2013
   Azizi NSM, 2015, ENERG BUILDINGS, V104, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.012
   Cândido C, 2011, BUILD ENVIRON, V46, P379, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.07.032
   De Dear R., 1998, ASHRAE Trans, V104, P145
   de Dear RJ, 2002, ENERG BUILDINGS, V34, P549, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00005-1
   Farghal A., 2010, P C AD CHANG NEW THI
   Humphreys MA, 2013, BUILD ENVIRON, V63, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.01.024
   Indraganti M, 2014, BUILD ENVIRON, V74, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.01.002
   Indraganti M, 2010, BUILD ENVIRON, V45, P1490, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.12.013
   Jones RV, 2016, ENRGY PROCED, V88, P714, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.049
   Kumar S, 2016, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V33, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2016.06.002
   Liu J, 2012, APPL THERM ENG, V35, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.09.037
   Luo MH, 2016, BUILD ENVIRON, V95, P322, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.07.015
   Luo MH, 2014, ENERG BUILDINGS, V72, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.12.057
   Mao Y., 2007, Xi'an Univ. Architect. Techn., DOI [10.7666/d.d195626, DOI 10.7666/D.D195626]
   McCartney KJ, 2002, ENERG BUILDINGS, V34, P623, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00013-0
   Mishra AK, 2015, BUILD ENVIRON, V85, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.12.006
   Mustapa MS, 2016, BUILD ENVIRON, V105, P332, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.06.014
   Nguyen AT, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V56, P291, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.03.021
   Nicol F, 2010, BUILD ENVIRON, V45, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.12.013
   Nicol J.F., 2004, ASHRAE transactions, V110
   Nicol JF, 2002, ENERG BUILDINGS, V34, P563, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00006-3
   Ning HR, 2016, BUILD ENVIRON, V99, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.01.003
   Roetzel A, 2010, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V14, P1001, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.005
   Singh M.K., 2011, APPL ENERGY, V88
   Singh MK, 2015, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V14, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2014.08.011
   Singh Shailza, 2016, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, V5, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.03.007
   Toe DHC, 2013, FRONT ARCHIT RES, V2, P278, DOI 10.1016/j.foar.2013.06.003
   Wang LP, 2015, ENERG BUILDINGS, V92, P313, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.01.060
   Wang Z., 2003, ASHRAE Transactions, V109, P350
   Wang ZJ, 2014, ENERG BUILDINGS, V77, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.03.054
   Wang ZJ, 2006, BUILD ENVIRON, V41, P1034, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.04.020
   Yan HY, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V116, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.12.053
   Yang L, 2007, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V48, P654, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2006.05.016
   Yang L, 2015, ENRGY PROCED, V75, P1413, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.237
NR 37
TC 71
Z9 77
U1 4
U2 92
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA PO BOX 564, 1001 LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND
SN 0378-7788
EI 1872-6178
J9 ENERG BUILDINGS
JI Energy Build.
PD APR 15
PY 2017
VL 141
BP 28
EP 38
DI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.016
PG 11
WC Construction & Building Technology; Energy & Fuels; Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Energy & Fuels; Engineering
GA ET3XG
UT WOS:000400212400003
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Duijn, M
   van Buuren, A
AF Duijn, Michael
   van Buuren, Arwin
TI The absence of institutional entrepreneurship in climate adaptation
   policy - in search of local adaptation strategies for Rotterdam's
   unembanked areas
SO POLICY AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Institutional redesign; entrepreneurial actions; flood risk management;
   adaptive strategies
ID LEGITIMACY; POLITICS
AB Innovative policy measures often imply institutional adjustments. Whether such adjustments are accomplished often depends upon the presence of institutional entrepreneurship: actors who take responsibility to initiate the necessary actions to redesign existing institutional practices. The question arises under which conditions can institutional entrepreneurship be developed? And, what might be the cause of lacking institutional entrepreneurship?In this article, the latter question is examined through in-depth collaborative research project for exploring alternative, adaptive flood risk strategies for flood proofing the unembanked area of the north-end of the city district Feijenoord in Rotterdam. Due to climate change, these areas are increasingly vulnerable to flooding. The traditional, institutionalized solution of raising the ground level before initiating new spatial developments does not suffice in the long term. Therefore, the city government explored alternative strategies for more adaptive ways of dealing with flood risks. Together with representatives of key stakeholders in the area, two key strategies for the unembanked areas were elaborated. These strategies have significant implications for the distribution of costs, risks and responsibilities and necessitate alternative governance architectures that exceed the current institutional structures.During the research project, it became clear that the developed alternative strategies fundamentally differed from the current institutional system. Thus, institutional redesign was necessary. This proved to be virtually impossible, especially because none of the involved actors was willing nor capable of undertaking entrepreneurial activities to start such redesign. This observation led us to further investigate into the causes and the consequences of the absent entrepreneurship.
C1 [Duijn, Michael; van Buuren, Arwin] Erasmus Univ, Dept Publ Adm & Sociol, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
C3 Erasmus University Rotterdam - Excl Erasmus MC; Erasmus University
   Rotterdam
RP Duijn, M (corresponding author), Erasmus Univ, Dept Publ Adm & Sociol, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
EM duijn@fsw.eur.nl
RI van Buuren, Arwin/I-6240-2013
OI van Buuren, Arwin/0000-0002-8504-0495
CR Alexander E., 2005, PLAN THEOR, V4, P209, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1473095205058494, 10.1177/1473095205058494]
   [Anonymous], 1998, The Theory of Institutional Design
   [Anonymous], 2010, 0222010 KFC
   Bakir C, 2009, GOVERNANCE, V22, P571, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01454.x
   Batterbee K., 2010, 0252010 DUR VERM
   Battilana J, 2009, ACAD MANAG ANN, V3, P65, DOI 10.1080/19416520903053598
   BOLIN B, 1970, SCI AM, V223, P124, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican0970-124
   Bulkeley H, 2013, ENVIRON POLIT, V22, P136, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2013.755797
   de Moel H, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P895, DOI 10.1007/s10113-013-0420-z
   Delmestri G, 2006, HUM RELAT, V59, P1515, DOI 10.1177/0018726706072848
   DiMaggio P. J., 1988, RES I PATTERNS ENV C
   DIMAGGIO PJ, 1983, AM SOCIOL REV, V48, P147, DOI 10.2307/2095101
   Dorado S, 2005, ORGAN STUD, V26, P385, DOI 10.1177/0170840605050873
   Dunn W.N., 1994, PUBLIC POLICY ANAL I, V2nd
   DURNING D, 1993, J POLICY ANAL MANAG, V12, P297, DOI 10.2307/3325237
   FLIEGEL FC, 1966, AM J SOCIOL, V72, P235, DOI 10.1086/224292
   Garud R, 2001, LEAS ORG MAN SERIES, P1
   Garud R, 2002, ACAD MANAGE J, V45, P196, DOI 10.5465/3069292
   Garud R, 2007, ORGAN STUD, V28, P957, DOI 10.1177/0170840607078958
   Ghorbani A., 2010, P 2010 WORKSH COMPL, V3, P33
   Gupta J, 2010, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V13, P459, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.05.006
   Hakansson H., 1993, The Embedded Firm on the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks
   Hoffman AJ, 1999, ACAD MANAGE J, V42, P351, DOI 10.5465/257008
   Jepperson R.L., 1991, The New institutionalism in organizational analysis, P143, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781139939744.004
   KEELING CD, 1976, TELLUS, V28, P538, DOI 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1976.tb00701.x
   Kingdon JW, 1995, Agendas, alternatives and public policies, V2nd
   Kokx A., 2012, Am. J. Clim. Change, V01, P181, DOI [10.4236/ajcc.2012.14015, DOI 10.4236/AJCC.2012.14015]
   Kokx A., 2012, 892013D KFC
   Koppenjan J., 2005, International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, V5, P240, DOI 10.1504/IJTPM.2005.008406
   Maguire S, 2004, ACAD MANAGE J, V47, P657, DOI [10.2307/20159610, 10.5465/20159610]
   Maguire S., 2007, International encyclopedia of organization studies
   Matthews T, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V138, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.010
   MEYER JW, 1977, AM J SOCIOL, V83, P340, DOI 10.1086/226550
   Meyer RE, 2006, ORGANIZATION, V13, P725, DOI 10.1177/1350508406067011
   Nabielek-Kronberger P., 2012, 892013C KFC
   Nooteboom B., 2008, MICR FDN INN POL
   OLIVER C, 1992, ORGAN STUD, V13, P563, DOI 10.1177/017084069201300403
   Peters BG, 2005, J POLIT, V67, P1275, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00360.x
   Phillips N, 2000, J MANAGE STUD, V37, P23, DOI 10.1111/1467-6486.00171
   RLI - Councils for the Environment and Infrastructure, 2011, 201106 RLI
   Roberts M., 2013, WHY I MATTER NEW I P, DOI [10.1007/978-1-137-32913-4, DOI 10.1007/978-1-137-32913-4]
   Scott W.R, 1995, Institutions and Organizations
   SUCHMAN MC, 1995, ACAD MANAGE REV, V20, P571, DOI 10.2307/258788
   van Buuren M. W., 2014, ACTION RES CLIMATE A
   Van der Lee D., 2013, THESIS
   Van Veelen P., 2013, 892013 KNOWL CLIM RE
   Van Vliet M., 2014, UNDERSTANDING MANAGI, P549
   Van Vliet M., 2012, DEELRAPPORT RUIMTELI
   Ward PJ, 2013, ENVIRON POLIT, V22, P518, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2012.683155
   Weimer D., 1995, Institutional Design
   Wejs A, 2014, ENVIRON POLIT, V23, P490, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2013.854967
   Wijen F, 2007, ORGAN STUD, V28, P1079, DOI 10.1177/0170840607078115
   Williamson OE, 1998, AM ECON REV, V88, P75
NR 53
TC 0
Z9 2
U1 1
U2 16
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1449-4035
EI 1839-3373
J9 POLICY SOC
JI Policy Soc.
PY 2017
VL 36
IS 4
BP 575
EP 594
DI 10.1080/14494035.2017.1369615
PG 20
WC Political Science; Public Administration
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Government & Law; Public Administration
GA FQ9NN
UT WOS:000418689000007
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Kondamudi, R
   Swamy, KN
   Rao, YV
   Kiran, TV
   Suman, K
   Rao, DS
   Rao, PR
   Subrahmanyam, D
   Sarla, N
   Kumari, BR
   Voleti, SR
AF Kondamudi, Rajesh
   Swamy, K. N.
   Rao, Y. Venkateswara
   Kiran, T. Vishnu
   Suman, K.
   Rao, D. Sanjeeva
   Rao, P. Raghuveer
   Subrahmanyam, D.
   Sarla, N.
   Kumari, B. Ramana
   Voleti, S. R.
TI Gas exchange, carbon balance and stomatal traits in wild and cultivated
   rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.) genotypes
SO ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM
LA English
DT Article
DE Wild rice accessions; Photosynthesis; Dark respiration; Light induced
   respiration; Stomata
ID ADAXIAL GUARD-CELLS; DARK RESPIRATION; ABAXIAL STOMATA; PHOTOSYNTHESIS;
   DROUGHT; YIELD; CO2; PHOTORESPIRATION; DOMESTICATION; ORGANIZATION
AB Carbon balancing within the plant species is an important feature for climatic adaptability. Photosynthesis and respiration traits are directly linked with carbon balance. These features were studied in 20 wild rice accessions Oryza spp., and cultivars. Wide variation was observed within the wild rice accessions for photosynthetic oxygen evolution or photosynthetic rate (A), dark (R-d), and light induced respiration (LIR) rates, as well as stomatal density and number. The mean rate of A varied from 10.49 lmol O2 m(-2) s(-1) in cultivated species and 13.09 mu mol O-2 m(-2) s(-1) in wild spp., The mean R-d is 2.09 mu mol O-2 m(-2) s(-1) and 2.31 mu mol O2 m(-2) s(-1) in cultivated and wild spp., respectively. Light induced Respiration (LIR) was found to be almost twice in wild rice spp., (16.75 mu mol O-2 m(-2) s(-1)) compared to cultivated Oryza spp., Among the various parameters, this study reveals LIR and A as the key factors for positive carbon balance. Stomatal contribution towards carbon balance appears to be more dependent on abaxial surface where several number of stomata are situated. Correlation analysis indicates that R-d and LIR increase with the increase in A. In this study, O. nivara (CR 100100, CR 100097), O. rufipogon (IR 103404) and O. glumaepatula (IR104387) were identified as potential donors which could be used in rice breeding program. Coordination between gas exchange and patchiness in stomatal behaviour appears to be important for carbon balance and environmental adaptation of wild rice accessions, therefore, survival under harsh environment.
C1 [Kondamudi, Rajesh; Swamy, K. N.; Rao, Y. Venkateswara; Kiran, T. Vishnu; Suman, K.; Rao, D. Sanjeeva; Rao, P. Raghuveer; Subrahmanyam, D.; Sarla, N.; Kumari, B. Ramana; Voleti, S. R.] Indian Inst Rice Res, Plant Physiol, Rajendra Nagar 500030, Telangana, India.
C3 Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR); ICAR - Indian Institute
   of Rice Research
RP Voleti, SR (corresponding author), Indian Inst Rice Res, Plant Physiol, Rajendra Nagar 500030, Telangana, India.
EM srvoleti@drricar.org
RI Durbha, Sanjeeva Rao/ABQ-8624-2022; swamy, Konduri/H-9871-2019;
   Neelamraju, Sarla/C-4480-2014
OI Thuraga, Vishnukiran/0000-0002-2801-9323
FU ICAR, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India [Phy/NICRA/2011-2012]
FX Financial assistance received from ICAR, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt.
   of India (F.No. Phy/NICRA/2011-2012) is duly acknowledged.
CR [Anonymous], 2007, Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding: Second Edition
   Barro F, 1996, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V149, P64, DOI 10.1016/S0176-1617(96)80174-X
   CHANDRA K, 2000, J RES ASSAM AGR U, V19, P251
   COOK MG, 1983, FIELD CROP RES, V6, P219, DOI 10.1016/0378-4290(83)90062-X
   Davey PA, 2004, PLANT PHYSIOL, V134, P520, DOI 10.1104/pp.103.030569
   Driscoll SP, 2006, J EXP BOT, V57, P381, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erj030
   Franks PJ, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P10343, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0904209106
   Gerhart LM, 2010, NEW PHYTOL, V188, P674, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03441.x
   Giuliani R, 2011, PLANT PHYSIOL, V162, P1632
   Goh CH, 2002, PLANT SCI, V162, P965, DOI 10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00047-X
   Goh CH, 1997, PLANT SCI, V127, P149, DOI 10.1016/S0168-9452(97)00122-2
   Gu JF, 2012, J EXP BOT, V63, P5137, DOI 10.1093/jxb/ers170
   Hopkins W., 2009, INTRO PLANT PHYSL, Vfourth
   Horie T., 2003, Rice science: innovations and impact for livelihood. Proceedings of the International Rice Research Conference, Beijing, China, 16-19 September 2002, P117
   Kajala K, 2011, J EXP BOT, V62, P3001, DOI 10.1093/jxb/err022
   Kiran TV, 2013, PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V51, P350, DOI 10.1007/s11099-013-0032-3
   Leakey ADB, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P3597, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0810955106
   Li X, 2013, SCI REP-UK, V3, DOI 10.1038/srep03433
   Makino A, 2011, PLANT PHYSIOL, V155, P125, DOI 10.1104/pp.110.165076
   Millar AH, 2011, ANNU REV PLANT BIOL, V62, P79, DOI 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103857
   Nevo E, 2010, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V33, P670, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02107.x
   Ohsumi A, 2007, PLANT PROD SCI, V10, P322, DOI 10.1626/pps.10.322
   Oka HI., 1988, DEV CROP SCI, V14, P1
   Peterhansel C, 2011, PLANT PHYSIOL, V155, P49, DOI 10.1104/pp.110.165019
   Placido DF, 2013, PLANT PHYSIOL, V161, P1806, DOI 10.1104/pp.113.214262
   RAJAGOPAL V, 1990, OLEAGINEUX, V45, P215
   Rodriguez M., 2005, Biotechnol. Appl, V22, P1
   Sage RF, 2001, PLANT BIOLOGY, V3, P202, DOI 10.1055/s-2001-15206
   Sarwar K.M. G., 2013, J BANGLADESH AGRIC U, V11, P47
   Schulze ED, 1982, PHYSL PLANT ECOLOGY, P181
   SECOND G, 1985, GENET SEL EVOL, V17, P89, DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-17-1-89
   Subrahmanyam D, 2011, CLIMATE CHANGE IMPAC, P143
   Sudharsan D, 2013, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V57, P107, DOI 10.1007/s00484-012-0538-6
   Swamy BPM, 2008, BIOTECHNOL ADV, V26, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.09.005
   Tanaka, 1976, P S CLIM RIC CLIM RI, P223
   Tausz M, 2013, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V88, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.12.005
   TSUNODA S, 1986, ANN BOT-LONDON, V58, P531, DOI 10.1093/annbot/58.4.531
   VENORA G, 1991, EUPHYTICA, V57, P275, DOI 10.1007/BF00039674
   Wang Y, 2008, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V31, P1307, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01843.x
   YEO ME, 1994, J EXP BOT, V45, P553, DOI 10.1093/jxb/45.5.553
   Zhao M, 2010, PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V48, P234, DOI 10.1007/s11099-010-0029-0
   Zhu QH, 2007, MOL BIOL EVOL, V24, P875, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msm005
   Zhu XG, 2008, CURR OPIN BIOTECH, V19, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.02.004
   Ziska LH, 2014, FUNCT PLANT BIOL, V41, P236, DOI 10.1071/FP13155
NR 44
TC 25
Z9 28
U1 1
U2 46
PU SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
PI HEIDELBERG
PA TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
SN 0137-5881
EI 1861-1664
J9 ACTA PHYSIOL PLANT
JI Acta Physiol. Plant.
PD JUN
PY 2016
VL 38
IS 6
AR 160
DI 10.1007/s11738-016-2173-z
PG 9
WC Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences
GA DO4TN
UT WOS:000377777100030
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Kesari, R
   Lasky, JR
   Villamor, JG
   Marais, DLD
   Chen, YJC
   Liu, TW
   Lin, W
   Juenger, TE
   Verslues, PE
AF Kesari, Ravi
   Lasky, Jesse R.
   Villamor, Joji Grace
   Marais, David L. Des
   Chen, Ying-Jiun C.
   Liu, Tzu-Wen
   Lin, Wendar
   Juenger, Thomas E.
   Verslues, Paul E.
TI Intron-mediated alternative splicing of <i>Arabidopsis P5CS1</i> and its
   association with natural variation in proline and climate adaptation
SO PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF
   AMERICA
LA English
DT Article
DE amino acid metabolism; drought adaptation; stress gene expression;
   osmoprotectant; compatible solute
ID NUCLEAR FACTOR TDP-43; THALIANA ACCESSIONS; IL POPULATIONS; CFTR EXON-9;
   STRESS; GENOME; DROUGHT; QTL; IDENTIFICATION; PLANTS
AB Drought-induced proline accumulation is widely observed in plants but its regulation and adaptive value are not as well understood. Proline accumulation of the Arabidopsis accession Shakdara (Sha) was threefold less than that of Landsberg erecta (Ler) and quantitative trait loci mapping identified a reduced function allele of the proline synthesis enzyme.1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase1 (P5CS1) as a basis for the lower proline of Sha. Sha P5CS1 had additional TA repeats in intron 2 and a G-to-T transversion in intron 3 that were sufficient to promote alternative splicing and production of a nonfunctional transcript lacking exon 3 (exon 3-skip P5CS1). In Sha, and additional accessions with the same intron polymorphisms, the nonfunctional exon 3-skip P5CS1 splice variant constituted as much as half of the total P5CS1 transcript. In a larger panel of Arabidopsis accessions, low water potential-induced proline accumulation varied by 10-fold and variable production of exon 3-skip P5CS1 among accessions was an important, but not the sole, factor underlying variation in proline accumulation. Population genetic analyses suggest that P5CS1 may have evolved under positive selection, and more extensive correlation of exon 3-skip P5CS1 production than proline abundance with climate conditions of natural accessions also suggest a role of P5CS1 in local adaptation to the environment. These data identify a unique source of alternative splicing in plants, demonstrate a role of exon 3-skip P5CS1 in natural variation of proline metabolism, and suggest an association of P5CS1 and its alternative splicing with environmental adaptation.
C1 [Kesari, Ravi; Villamor, Joji Grace; Chen, Ying-Jiun C.; Liu, Tzu-Wen; Lin, Wendar; Verslues, Paul E.] Acad Sinica, Inst Plant & Microbial Biol, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.
   [Lasky, Jesse R.; Marais, David L. Des; Juenger, Thomas E.] Univ Texas Austin, Sect Integrat Biol, Austin, TX 78712 USA.
   [Juenger, Thomas E.] Univ Texas Austin, Inst Cellular & Mol Biol, Austin, TX 78712 USA.
C3 Academia Sinica - Taiwan; University of Texas System; University of
   Texas Austin; University of Texas System; University of Texas Austin
RP Verslues, PE (corresponding author), Acad Sinica, Inst Plant & Microbial Biol, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.
EM paulv@gate.sinica.edu.tw
RI Lin, Wendar/LXV-5654-2024; Kesari, Ravi/JPY-0113-2023
OI Chen, Timothy C./0000-0003-3766-4612
FU Academia Sinica; National Science Council of Taiwan
   [NSC-97-2311-B-001-005]; US National Science Foundation [DEB 0618347,
   IOS-0922457]; Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems; Direct For
   Biological Sciences [0922457] Funding Source: National Science
   Foundation
FX We thank Mei-Jane Fang, Ang-Hsi Lin, Na Lin, and Ling-Shan Yu for
   assistance; and Dr. Wendy Hwang-Verslues for critical reading. This work
   was supported by an Academia Sinica Career Development Award (to P. E.
   V.); National Science Council of Taiwan Grant NSC-97-2311-B-001-005 (to
   P. E. V.) and a postdoctoral stipend (to R. K.); and US National Science
   Foundation Grants DEB 0618347 and IOS-0922457 (to T.E.J.).
CR Anastasio AE, 2011, PLANT J, V67, P554, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04606.x
   Bouchabke O, 2008, PLOS ONE, V3, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001705
   Buratti E, 2004, AM J HUM GENET, V74, P1322, DOI 10.1086/420978
   Buratti E, 2001, EMBO J, V20, P1774, DOI 10.1093/emboj/20.7.1774
   Cao J, 2011, NAT GENET, V43, P956, DOI 10.1038/ng.911
   CELLINI A, 1986, EMBO J, V5, P1023, DOI 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04317.x
   Clerkx EJM, 2004, PLANT PHYSIOL, V135, P432, DOI 10.1104/pp.103.036814
   Fournier-Level A, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P86, DOI 10.1126/science.1209271
   Fu J, 2009, NAT GENET, V41, P166, DOI 10.1038/ng.308
   Hancock AM, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P83, DOI 10.1126/science.1209244
   HANSON AD, 1994, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V91, P306, DOI 10.1073/pnas.91.1.306
   Hefferon TW, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P3504, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0400182101
   Horton MW, 2012, NAT GENET, V44, P212, DOI 10.1038/ng.1042
   Kang HM, 2008, GENETICS, V178, P1709, DOI 10.1534/genetics.107.080101
   Lisec J, 2008, PLANT J, V53, P960, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03383.x
   Lisec J, 2009, PLANT J, V59, P777, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03910.x
   Marais DLD, 2010, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1206, P56, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05703.x
   Matsukura S, 2010, MOL GENET GENOMICS, V283, P185, DOI 10.1007/s00438-009-0506-y
   McKay JK, 2008, EVOLUTION, V62, P3014, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00474.x
   Niksic M, 1999, HUM MOL GENET, V8, P2339, DOI 10.1093/hmg/8.13.2339
   Pagani F, 2000, J BIOL CHEM, V275, P21041, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M910165199
   Reddy ASN, 2007, ANNU REV PLANT BIOL, V58, P267, DOI 10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103754
   Reddy ASN, 2012, PLANT PHYSIOL, V158, P67, DOI 10.1104/pp.111.186700
   Rowe HC, 2008, PLANT CELL, V20, P1199, DOI 10.1105/tpc.108.058131
   Sanchez SE, 2010, NATURE, V468, P112, DOI 10.1038/nature09470
   Sharma S, 2011, PLANT PHYSIOL, V157, P292, DOI 10.1104/pp.111.183210
   Sharma S, 2010, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V33, P1838, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02188.x
   Sugliani M, 2010, PLANT CELL, V22, P1936, DOI 10.1105/tpc.110.074674
   Szabados L, 2010, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V15, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.009
   Székely G, 2008, PLANT J, V53, P11, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03318.x
   Toomajian C, 2006, PLOS BIOL, V4, P732, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040137
   Verslues Paul E, 2010, Arabidopsis Book, V8, pe0140, DOI 10.1199/tab.0140
   Verslues PE, 2011, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V14, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.04.006
   Wentzell AM, 2007, PLOS GENET, V3, P1687, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030162
   YOSHIBA Y, 1995, PLANT J, V7, P751, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.07050751.x
NR 35
TC 101
Z9 107
U1 1
U2 56
PU NATL ACAD SCIENCES
PI WASHINGTON
PA 2101 CONSTITUTION AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20418 USA
SN 0027-8424
J9 P NATL ACAD SCI USA
JI Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
PD JUN 5
PY 2012
VL 109
IS 23
BP 9197
EP 9202
DI 10.1073/pnas.1203433109
PG 6
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA 955BC
UT WOS:000304991100082
PM 22615385
OA Green Published, Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Grubinger, S
   Coops, NC
   O'Neill, GA
AF Grubinger, Samuel
   Coops, Nicholas C.
   O'Neill, Gregory A.
TI Picturing local adaptation: Spectral and structural traits from drone
   remote sensing reveal clinal responses to climate transfer in
   common-garden trials of interior spruce (<i>Picea engelmannii x
   glauca)</i>
SO GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE climate; digital aerial photogrammetry (DAP); drone; local adaptation;
   multispectral; phenotyping; provenance testing; spruce
ID PHOTOCHEMICAL REFLECTANCE INDEX; ASSISTED MIGRATION; CHLOROPHYLL
   CONTENT; DOUGLAS-FIR; FOREST; PINE; POPULATIONS; NITROGEN; DROUGHT;
   MODELS
AB Common-garden trials of forest trees provide phenotype data used to assess growth and local adaptation; this information is foundational to tree breeding programs, genecology, and gene conservation. As jurisdictions consider assisted migration strategies to match populations to suitable climates, in situ progeny and provenance trials provide experimental evidence of adaptive responses to climate change. We used drone technology, multispectral imaging, and digital aerial photogrammetry to quantify spectral traits related to stress, photosynthesis, and carotenoids, and structural traits describing crown height, size, and complexity at six climatically disparate common-garden trials of interior spruce (Picea engelmannii x glauca) in western Canada. Through principal component analysis, we identified key components of climate related to temperature, moisture, and elevational gradients. Phenotypic clines in remotely sensed traits were analyzed as trait correlations with provenance climate transfer distances along principal components (PCs). We used traits showing clinal variation to model best linear unbiased predictions for tree height (R-2 = .98-.99, root mean square error [RMSE] = 0.06-0.10 m) and diameter at breast height (DBH, R-2 = .71-.97, RMSE = 2.57-3.80 mm) and generated multivariate climate transfer functions with the model predictions. Significant (p < .05) clines were present for spectral traits at all sites along all PCs. Spectral traits showed stronger clinal variation than structural traits along temperature and elevational gradients and along moisture gradients at wet, coastal sites, but not at dry, interior sites. Spectral traits may capture patterns of local adaptation to temperature and montane growing seasons which are distinct from moisture-limited patterns in stem growth. This work demonstrates that multispectral indices improve the assessment of local adaptation and that spectral and structural traits from drone remote sensing produce reliable proxies for ground-measured height and DBH. This phenotyping framework contributes to the analysis of common-garden trials towards a mechanistic understanding of local adaptation to climate.
C1 [Grubinger, Samuel; Coops, Nicholas C.] Univ British Columbia, Fac Forestry, Integrated Remote Sensing Studio, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   [O'Neill, Gregory A.] BC Minist Forests, Kalamalka Forestry Ctr, Vernon, BC, Canada.
   [Grubinger, Samuel] Univ British Columbia, Fac Forestry, Integrated Remote Sensing Studio, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
C3 University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia
RP Grubinger, S (corresponding author), Univ British Columbia, Fac Forestry, Integrated Remote Sensing Studio, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
EM samuel.grubinger@gmail.com
RI Coops, Nicholas/J-1543-2012
OI Coops, Nicholas/0000-0002-0151-9037
FU Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [STPGP
   506286-17]; BC Ministry of Forests; FYBRSolutions
FX Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Grant/Award
   Number: 506286-17; FYBRSolutions; BC Ministry of Forests
CR Alberto FJ, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P1645, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12181
   Badgley G, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P3731, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14729
   Badgley G, 2017, SCI ADV, V3, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1602244
   Benito-Garzón M, 2015, NEW FOREST, V46, P979, DOI 10.1007/s11056-015-9481-9
   Booth TH, 2023, NEW FOREST, V54, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11056-022-09940-y
   Burdon RD, 2017, FOR SCI, V83, P131, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-65018-0_4
   Camarretta N, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12193184
   Castellanos-Acuña D, 2015, ECOSPHERE, V6, DOI 10.1890/ES14-00375.1
   Cepl J, 2018, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V219, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2018.10.001
   Coops NC, 2005, AUST J BOT, V53, P417, DOI 10.1071/BT04129
   Coops NC, 2019, NATURE, V572, P433, DOI 10.1038/d41586-019-02474-y
   D'Odorico P, 2021, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V44, P3552, DOI 10.1111/pce.14177
   D'Odorico P, 2020, NEW PHYTOL, V226, P1667, DOI 10.1111/nph.16488
   De La Torre AR, 2014, NEW PHYTOL, V201, P687, DOI 10.1111/nph.12540
   Demmig-Adams B, 2020, MOLECULES, V25, DOI 10.3390/molecules25245825
   Depardieu C, 2021, MOL ECOL, V30, P3898, DOI 10.1111/mec.15846
   du Toit F, 2022, FRONT PLANT SCI, V13, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2022.893017
   du Toit F, 2020, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V34, P649, DOI 10.1007/s00468-019-01946-y
   Dudney J, 2023, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V29, P4368, DOI 10.1111/gcb.16740
   Dungey HS, 2018, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V23, P854, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.08.005
   Eitel JUH, 2011, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V115, P3640, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.09.002
   Farjat A, 2017, J AM STAT ASSOC, V112, P909, DOI 10.1080/01621459.20171292179
   Gamon JA, 1997, OECOLOGIA, V112, P492, DOI 10.1007/s004420050337
   Gamon JA, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P13087, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1606162113
   Gamon JA, 2013, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V135, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2013.03.032
   Ganz S, 2019, FORESTS, V10, DOI 10.3390/f10080694
   Gao X, 2000, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V74, P609, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00150-4
   Gitelson AA, 2003, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V160, P271, DOI 10.1078/0176-1617-00887
   Gitelson AA, 1996, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V148, P501, DOI 10.1016/S0176-1617(96)80285-9
   Grubinger S, 2020, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V473, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118284
   Housset JM, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V218, P630, DOI 10.1111/nph.14968
   Isaac-Renton MG, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P2607, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12604
   Ivkovic M, 2016, NEW FOREST, V47, P209, DOI 10.1007/s11056-015-9510-8
   Jansson G, 2017, SCAND J FOREST RES, V32, P273, DOI 10.1080/02827581.2016.1242770
   Johnston M., 2009, 2 CLIM CHANG TECHN C, V93, P389
   Koh JCO, 2022, NEW PHYTOL, V233, P2659, DOI 10.1111/nph.17947
   Ledig F. T., 1992, GENETIC STRATEGIES R, V50
   MacLachlan IR, 2021, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V118, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2016900118
   MacLachlan IR, 2018, EVOL APPL, V11, P166, DOI 10.1111/eva.12525
   Martin ME, 2008, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V112, P3511, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2008.04.008
   Martinez-Meier A, 2008, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V256, P837, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.041
   MATYAS C, 1994, TREE PHYSIOL, V14, P797, DOI 10.1093/treephys/14.7-8-9.797
   McDowell NG, 2020, SCIENCE, V368, P964, DOI 10.1126/science.aaz9463
   McDowell NG, 2015, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V20, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.10.008
   Merton R.N., 1999, Multi-temporal analysis of community scale vegetation stress with imaging spectroscopy
   Mishra A, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-32244-w
   Montwé D, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-04039-5
   Montwé D, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P806, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13123
   Morland C, 2018, FOREST POLICY ECON, V92, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.04.003
   O'Neill AL, 2002, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V80, P134, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00294-2
   O'Neill GA, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V328, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.039
   Parker GG, 2004, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V189, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.09.001
   Pedlar JH, 2012, BIOSCIENCE, V62, P835, DOI 10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.10
   Pelai R, 2021, CAN J FOREST RES, V51, P326, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2020-0235
   PENUELAS J, 1995, PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V31, P221
   PULKKINEN P, 1990, TREE PHYSIOL, V6, P381, DOI 10.1093/treephys/6.4.381
   Rehfeldt GE, 1999, ECOL MONOGR, V69, P375, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0375:GRTCIP]2.0.CO;2
   REHFELDT GE, 1994, CAN J BOT, V72, P1197, DOI 10.1139/b94-146
   Reich PB, 2018, NATURE, V562, P263, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0582-4
   Robinson G. K., 1991, STAT SCI, V6, P15, DOI 10.1214/ss/1177011926
   Roussel JR, 2020, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V251, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112061
   Sang ZHH, 2021, CLIM RISK MANAG, V34, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100380
   Santini F, 2021, NEW PHYTOL, V229, P245, DOI 10.1111/nph.16862
   Sebastian-Azcona J, 2020, FRONT PLANT SCI, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2020.00208
   Serbin SP, 2019, NEW PHYTOL, V224, P1557, DOI 10.1111/nph.16123
   Seyednasrollah B, 2021, NEW PHYTOL, V229, P2586, DOI 10.1111/nph.17046
   St Clair JB, 2022, ECOSPHERE, V13, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.4089
   Tingey DT, 2003, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V9, P1038, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00646.x
   Ukrainetz NK, 2011, CAN J FOREST RES, V41, P1452, DOI [10.1139/X11-060, 10.1139/x11-060]
   Wang TL, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0156720
   Watt MS, 2023, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V330, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109294
   White JC, 2013, FOREST CHRON, V89, P722, DOI 10.5558/tfc2013-132
   White T. L., 2007, Forest Genetics
   Wong CYS, 2022, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V321, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108977
   Wong CYS, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V206, P187, DOI 10.1111/nph.13159
   Ying CC, 2006, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V227, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.02.028
   Zarco-Tejada PJ, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V223, P320, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.01.031
   Zedel S., 2017, 099 PROV B C
   Zhang WM, 2016, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/rs8060501
NR 79
TC 5
Z9 6
U1 2
U2 16
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1354-1013
EI 1365-2486
J9 GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL
JI Glob. Change Biol.
PD 2023 JUL 9
PY 2023
DI 10.1111/gcb.16855
EA JUL 2023
PG 19
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA L8RG9
UT WOS:001025876100001
PM 37424219
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Benomar, L
   Lamhamedi, MS
   Villeneuve, I
   Rainville, A
   Beaulieu, J
   Bousquet, J
   Margolis, HA
AF Benomar, Lahcen
   Lamhamedi, Mohammed S.
   Villeneuve, Isabelle
   Rainville, Andre
   Beaulieu, Jean
   Bousquet, Jean
   Margolis, Hank A.
TI Fine-scale geographic variation in photosynthetic-related traits of
   <i>Picea glauca</i> seedlings indicates local adaptation to climate
SO TREE PHYSIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptation; climate change; mesophyll conductance; photosynthesis; white
   spruce
ID MESOPHYLL CONDUCTANCE; GENETIC-VARIATION; WATER-USE; DIFFUSION
   CONDUCTANCE; ASSISTED MIGRATION; LEAF AGE; GROWTH; CO2; POPULATIONS;
   NITROGEN
AB Climate-related variations in functional traits of boreal tree species can result both from physiological acclimation and genetic adaptation of local populations to their biophysical environment. To improve our understanding and prediction of the physiological and growth responses of populations to climate change, we studied the role of climate of seed origin in determining variations in functional traits and its implications for tree improvement programs for a commonly reforested boreal conifer, white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss). We evaluated growth, root-to-shoot ratio (R/S), specific leaf area (SLA), needle nitrogen (N-mass), total non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) and photosynthetic traits of 3-year-old seedlings in a greenhouse experiment using seed from six seed orchards (SO) representing the different regions where white spruce is reforested in Qu,bec. Height and total dry mass (TDM) were positively correlated with photosynthetic capacity (A(max)), stomatal conductance (g(s)) and mesophyll conductance (g(m)). Total dry mass, but not height growth, was strongly correlated with latitude of seed origin (SO) and associated climate variables. A(max), g(s), g(m) and more marginally, photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency (PNUE) were positively associated with the mean July temperature of the SO, while water use efficiency (WUE) was negatively associated. Maximum rates of carboxylation (V-cmax), maximum rates of electron transport (J(max)), SLA, N-mass, NSC and R/S showed no pattern. Our results did not demonstrate a higher A(max) for northern seed orchards, although this has been previously hypothesized as an adaptation mechanism for maintaining carbon uptake in northern regions. We suggest that g(s), g(m), WUE and PNUE are the functional traits most associated with fine-scale geographic clines and with the degree of local adaptation of white spruce populations to their biophysical environments. These geographic patterns may reflect in situ adaptive genetic differences in photosynthetic efficiency along the cline.
C1 [Benomar, Lahcen; Villeneuve, Isabelle; Bousquet, Jean; Margolis, Hank A.] Univ Laval, Fac Foresterie Geog & Geomat, Ctr Etud Foret, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada.
   [Lamhamedi, Mohammed S.; Rainville, Andre] Minist Forets, Direct Rech Forestiere, Quebec City, PQ G1P 3W8, Canada.
   [Beaulieu, Jean] Nat Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Serv, Canadian Wood Fibre Ctr, Stn St Foy, Quebec City, PQ G1V 4C7, Canada.
C3 Laval University; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service
RP Benomar, L (corresponding author), Univ Laval, Fac Foresterie Geog & Geomat, Ctr Etud Foret, Pavillon Abitibi Price, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada.
EM lahcen.benomar.1@ulaval.ca
RI benomar, lahcen/Q-3080-2019; Bousquet, Jean/O-4221-2019
OI benomar, lahcen/0000-0001-9301-5655
FU Fonds de la Recherche du Quebec sur la Nature et les Technologies
   (FRQNT), Programme de recherche en partenariat sur l'amenagement et
   l'environnement forestiers; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research
   Council of Canada; Direction de la recherche forestiere (DRF) du
   ministere des Forets, de la Faune et des Parcs (MFFP)
FX This research was funded by grants to H.A.M. from the 'Fonds de la
   Recherche du Quebec sur la Nature et les Technologies (FRQNT), Programme
   de recherche en partenariat sur l'amenagement et l'environnement
   forestiers' and the Discovery Grant Program of the Natural Sciences and
   Engineering Research Council of Canada. Major additional support was
   also provided by funding from the 'Direction de la recherche forestiere
   (DRF) du ministere des Forets, de la Faune et des Parcs (MFFP)' awarded
   to M.S.L.
CR Ainsworth EA, 2011, PLANT PHYSIOL, V155, P64, DOI 10.1104/pp.110.167684
   Aitken S.N., 2013, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V44, P367, DOI DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135747
   Andalo C, 2005, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V205, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.045
   [Anonymous], LAUX117E CAN FOR SER
   Araya T, 2006, PLANT CELL PHYSIOL, V47, P644, DOI 10.1093/pcp/pcj033
   Beaulieu J., 2009, MANUEL FORESTERIE, P1093
   Bigras FJ, 2006, TREE PHYSIOL, V26, P875, DOI 10.1093/treephys/26.7.875
   BOWES G, 1993, ANNU REV PLANT PHYS, V44, P309, DOI 10.1146/annurev.pp.44.060193.001521
   Bown HE, 2009, TREE PHYSIOL, V29, P1143, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpp051
   Buckley TN, 2014, PHOTOSYNTH RES, V119, P77, DOI 10.1007/s11120-013-9825-2
   Carles S, 2011, NEW FOREST, V42, P195, DOI 10.1007/s11056-011-9247-y
   Carles S, 2012, TREE GENET GENOMES, V8, P39, DOI 10.1007/s11295-011-0418-y
   Chow PS, 2004, TREE PHYSIOL, V24, P1129, DOI 10.1093/treephys/24.10.1129
   Dang QingLai Dang QingLai, 2008, Open Forest Science Journal, V1, P68, DOI 10.2174/1874398600801010068
   De Frenne P, 2013, J ECOL, V101, P784, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12074
   De Lucia EH, 2003, FUNCT PLANT BIOL, V30, P1197, DOI 10.1071/FP03141
   Duan BL, 2011, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V151, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.09.008
   Eichelmann H, 1999, PLANT PHYSIOL, V119, P179, DOI 10.1104/pp.119.1.179
   Ethier GJ, 2004, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V27, P137, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01140.x
   Evans JR, 2009, J EXP BOT, V60, P2235, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erp117
   FARQUHAR GD, 1980, PLANTA, V149, P78, DOI 10.1007/BF00386231
   FIELD C, 1983, OECOLOGIA, V56, P341, DOI 10.1007/BF00379710
   Flexas J, 2008, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V31, P602, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01757.x
   Flexas J, 2013, PHOTOSYNTH RES, V117, P45, DOI 10.1007/s11120-013-9844-z
   Gagnon J., 2011, P PRODUCTION PLANTS, P47
   Gornall JL, 2007, CAN J BOT, V85, P1202, DOI 10.1139/B07-079
   He JS, 2009, ECOLOGY, V90, P2779, DOI 10.1890/08-1126.1
   Iglesias DJ, 2002, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V116, P563, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1160416.x
   Kasai M, 2008, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V134, P216, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01105.x
   KHALIL MAK, 1985, CAN J FOREST RES, V15, P444, DOI 10.1139/x85-071
   KOZLOWSKI TT, 1992, BOT REV, V58, P107, DOI 10.1007/BF02858600
   Laisk A. K., 1977, Kinetics of Photosynthesis and Photorespiration in C 3 plant
   Lamhamedi M, 2001, CAN J FOREST RES, V31, P1968, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-31-11-1968
   Lamhamedi MS, 2006, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V70, P108, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2005.0109
   Lamhamedi MS, 2000, TREE PHYSIOL, V20, P869
   Lamhamedi MS, 2012, VERGER GRAINES PROVI, P2
   LANGLOIS CG, 1993, DEV PLANT SOIL SCI, V45, P303
   Li MH, 2002, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V16, P331, DOI 10.1007/s00468-002-0172-8
   LI P, 1993, SILVAE GENET, V42, P52
   Li P, 1997, CAN J FOREST RES, V27, P189, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-27-2-189
   Li YY, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI [10.1371/journal.pone.0077685, 10.1371/journal.pone.0055108, 10.1371/journal.pone.0071994, 10.1371/journal.pone.0066567, 10.1371/journal.pone.0063648, 10.1371/journal.pone.0054369, 10.1371/journal.pone.0052093, 10.1371/journal.pone.0062036]
   Long SP, 2003, J EXP BOT, V54, P2393, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erg262
   Lu PX, 2011, FOREST CHRON, V87, P391
   Montpied P, 2009, J EXP BOT, V60, P2407, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erp093
   Mullin T. J., 2011, Genetics, genomics and breeding of conifers, P40
   NAFZIGER ED, 1976, PLANT PHYSIOL, V57, P560, DOI 10.1104/pp.57.4.560
   Niinemets Ü, 2009, J EXP BOT, V60, P2249, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erp036
   Niinemets U, 2006, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V29, P1159, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01499.x
   O'Neill G.A., 2008, ASSISTED MIGRATION A
   Oleksyn J, 1998, FUNCT ECOL, V12, P573, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00236.x
   Pedlar JH, 2011, FOREST CHRON, V87, P766, DOI 10.5558/tfc2011-093
   Poorter H, 2009, NEW PHYTOL, V182, P565, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02830.x
   Rainville A, 2014, MEM RECH FOR
   Regniere J, 2003, BIOSIM OPTIMIZING PE, P1
   Reich PB, 2006, NATURE, V439, P457, DOI 10.1038/nature04282
   Richardson JL, 2014, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V29, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2014.01.002
   Rossi S, 2014, FRONT PLANT SCI, V5, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00574
   Savolainen O, 2013, NAT REV GENET, V14, P807, DOI 10.1038/nrg3522
   Sharkey TD, 2004, ECOL STU AN, V178, P171
   Sharkey TD, 2007, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V30, P1035, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01710.x
   Soolanayakanahally RY, 2009, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V32, P1821, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02042.x
   Thomson AM, 2010, CAN J FOREST RES, V40, P1576, DOI 10.1139/X10-112
   von Caemmerer S., 2000, Biochemical Models of Leaf Photosynthesis, DOI DOI 10.1017/CB09781107415324.004
   Wahid N., 2013, Journal of Sustainable Forestry, V32, P576, DOI 10.1080/10549811.2013.791231
   Warren CR, 2006, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V20, P157, DOI 10.1007/s00468-005-0021-7
   Wright IJ, 2004, NATURE, V428, P821, DOI 10.1038/nature02403
   Zhu WZ, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0034213
NR 67
TC 10
Z9 12
U1 3
U2 72
PU OXFORD UNIV PRESS
PI OXFORD
PA GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND
SN 0829-318X
EI 1758-4469
J9 TREE PHYSIOL
JI Tree Physiol.
PD AUG
PY 2015
VL 35
IS 8
BP 864
EP 878
DI 10.1093/treephys/tpv054
PG 15
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA CQ4QQ
UT WOS:000360590100007
PM 26116923
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Kretibich, H
   Schröter, K
   Di Baldassarre, G
   Van Loon, AF
   Mazzoleni, M
   Abeshu, GW
   Agafonova, S
   AghaKouchak, A
   Aksoy, H
   Alvarez-Garreton, C
   Aznar, B
   Balkhi, L
   Barendrecht, MH
   Biancamaria, S
   Bos-Burgering, L
   Bradley, C
   Budiyono, Y
   Buytaert, W
   Capewell, L
   Carlson, H
   Cavus, Y
   Couasnon, A
   Coxon, G
   Daliakopoulos, I
   de Ruiter, MC
   Delus, C
   Erfurt, M
   Esposito, G
   François, D
   Frappart, F
   Freer, J
   Frolova, N
   Gain, AK
   Grillakis, M
   Grima, JO
   Guzmán, DA
   Huning, LS
   Ionita, M
   Kharlamov, M
   Khoi, DN
   Kieboom, N
   Kireeva, M
   Koutroulis, A
   Lavado-Casimiro, W
   Li, HY
   LLasat, MC
   Macdonald, D
   Mård, J
   Mathew-Richards, H
   McKenzie, A
   Mejia, A
   Mendiondo, EM
   Mens, M
   Mobini, S
   Mohor, GS
   Nagavciuc, V
   Ngo-Duc, T
   Nguyen, HTT
   Nhi, PTT
   Petrucci, O
   Quan, NH
   Quintana-Seguí, P
   Razavi, S
   Ridolfi, E
   Riegel, J
   Sadik, MS
   Sairam, N
   Savelli, E
   Sazonov, A
   Sharma, S
   Sörensen, J
   Souza, FAA
   Stahl, K
   Steinhausen, M
   Stoelzle, M
   Szalinska, W
   Tang, QH
   Tian, FQ
   Tokarczyk, T
   Tovar, C
   Tran, TV
   van Huijgevoort, MHJ
   van Vliet, MTH
   Vorogushyn, S
   Wagener, T
   Wang, YL
   Wendt, DE
   Wickham, E
   Yang, L
   Zambrano-Bigiarini, M
   Ward, PJ
AF Kreibich, Heidi
   Schroeter, Kai
   Di Baldassarre, Giuliano
   Van Loon, Anne F.
   Mazzoleni, Maurizio
   Abeshu, Guta Wakbulcho
   Agafonova, Svetlana
   AghaKouchak, Amir
   Aksoy, Hafzullah
   Alvarez-Garreton, Camila
   Aznar, Blanca
   Balkhi, Laila
   Barendrecht, Marlies H.
   Biancamaria, Sylvain
   Bos-Burgering, Liduin
   Bradley, Chris
   Budiyono, Yus
   Buytaert, Wouter
   Capewell, Lucinda
   Carlson, Hayley
   Cavus, Yonca
   Couasnon, Anais
   Coxon, Gemma
   Daliakopoulos, Ioannis
   de Ruiter, Marleen C.
   Delus, Claire
   Erfurt, Mathilde
   Esposito, Giuseppe
   Francois, Didier
   Frappart, Frederic
   Freer, Jim
   Frolova, Natalia
   Gain, Animesh K.
   Grillakis, Manolis
   Grima, Jordi Oriol
   Guzman, Diego A.
   Huning, Laurie S.
   Ionita, Monica
   Kharlamov, Maxim
   Khoi, Dao Nguyen
   Kieboom, Natalie
   Kireeva, Maria
   Koutroulis, Aristeidis
   Lavado-Casimiro, Waldo
   Li, Hong-Yi
   LLasat, Maria Carmen
   Macdonald, David
   Mard, Johanna
   Mathew-Richards, Hannah
   McKenzie, Andrew
   Mejia, Alfonso
   Mendiondo, Eduardo Mario
   Mens, Marjolein
   Mobini, Shifteh
   Mohor, Guilherme Samprogna
   Nagavciuc, Viorica
   Ngo-Duc, Thanh
   Nguyen, Huynh Thi Thao
   Nhi, Pham Thi Thao
   Petrucci, Olga
   Quan, Nguyen Hong
   Quintana-Segui, Pere
   Razavi, Saman
   Ridolfi, Elena
   Riegel, Jannik
   Sadik, Md Shibly
   Sairam, Nivedita
   Savelli, Elisa
   Sazonov, Alexey
   Sharma, Sanjib
   Soerensen, Johanna
   Souza, Felipe Augusto Arguello
   Stahl, Kerstin
   Steinhausen, Max
   Stoelzle, Michael
   Szalinska, Wiwiana
   Tang, Qiuhong
   Tian, Fuqiang
   Tokarczyk, Tamara
   Tovar, Carolina
   Tran, Thi Van Thu
   van Huijgevoort, Marjolein H. J.
   van Vliet, Michelle T. H.
   Vorogushyn, Sergiy
   Wagener, Thorsten
   Wang, Yueling
   Wendt, Doris E.
   Wickham, Elliot
   Yang, Long
   Zambrano-Bigiarini, Mauricio
   Ward, Philip J.
TI Panta Rhei benchmark dataset: socio-hydrological data of paired events
   of floods and droughts
SO EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE DATA
LA English
DT Article
ID DISASTER LOSSES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RIVER FLOODS; RISK; VULNERABILITY;
   ATTRIBUTION; EXPOSURE; TRENDS
AB As the adverse impacts of hydrological extremes increase in many regions of the world, a better understanding of the drivers of changes in risk and impacts is essential for effective flood and drought risk management and climate adaptation. However, there is currently a lack of comprehensive, empirical data about the processes, interactions, and feedbacks in complex human-water systems leading to flood and drought impacts. Here we present a benchmark dataset containing socio-hydrological data of paired events, i.e. two floods or two droughts that occurred in the same area. The 45 paired events occurred in 42 different study areas and cover a wide range of socio-economic and hydro-climatic conditions. The dataset is unique in covering both floods and droughts, in the number of cases assessed and in the quantity of socio-hydrological data. The benchmark dataset comprises (1) detailed review-style reports about the events and key processes between the two events of a pair; (2) the key data table containing variables that assess the indicators which characterize management shortcomings, hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and impacts of all events; and (3) a table of the indicators of change that indicate the differences between the first and second event of a pair. The advantages of the dataset are that it enables comparative analyses across all the paired events based on the indicators of change and allows for detailed context- and location-specific assessments based on the extensive data and reports of the individual study areas. The dataset can be used by the scientific community for exploratory data analyses, e.g. focused on causal links between risk management; changes in hazard, exposure and vulnerability; and flood or drought impacts. The data can also be used for the development, calibration, and validation of socio-hydrological models. The dataset is available to the public through the GFZ Data Services (Kreibich et al., 2023,https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.4.4.2023.001).
C1 [Kreibich, Heidi; Schroeter, Kai; Sairam, Nivedita; Steinhausen, Max; Vorogushyn, Sergiy] GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci, Sect Hydrol, Potsdam, Germany.
   [Van Loon, Anne F.; Mazzoleni, Maurizio; Barendrecht, Marlies H.; Couasnon, Anais; de Ruiter, Marleen C.; Ward, Philip J.] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
   [Abeshu, Guta Wakbulcho; Li, Hong-Yi] Univ Houston, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Houston, TX USA.
   [Agafonova, Svetlana; Frolova, Natalia; Kharlamov, Maxim; Kireeva, Maria; Sazonov, Alexey] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Dept Land Hydrol, Moscow, Russia.
   [AghaKouchak, Amir; Huning, Laurie S.] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Irvine, CA USA.
   [Aksoy, Hafzullah] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye.
   [Alvarez-Garreton, Camila; Zambrano-Bigiarini, Mauricio] Ctr Climate & Resilience Res CR2 FONDAP 1522A0001, Santiago, Chile.
   [Zambrano-Bigiarini, Mauricio] Univ La Frontera, Dept Civil Engn, Temuco, Chile.
   [Aznar, Blanca; Grima, Jordi Oriol] Barcelona Cicle Aigua SA, Operat Dept, Barcelona, Spain.
   [Balkhi, Laila; Carlson, Hayley; Razavi, Saman] Univ Saskatchewan, Global Inst Water Secur, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
   [Biancamaria, Sylvain] Univ Toulouse, CNRS, CNES, LEGOS,IRD,UPS, Toulouse, France.
   [Bos-Burgering, Liduin] Deltares, Dept Groundwater Management, Delft, Netherlands.
   [Bradley, Chris; Capewell, Lucinda] Univ Birmingham, Sch Geog Earth & Environm Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England.
   [Budiyono, Yus] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy BRIN, Jakarta, Indonesia.
   [Buytaert, Wouter] Imperial Coll London, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, England.
   [Cavus, Yonca] Beykent Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye.
   [Cavus, Yonca] Istanbul Tech Univ, Grad Sch, Istanbul, Turkiye.
   [Cavus, Yonca; Erfurt, Mathilde; Stahl, Kerstin; Stoelzle, Michael] Univ Freiburg, Fac Environm & Nat Resources, Freiburg, Germany.
   [Coxon, Gemma; Freer, Jim] Univ Bristol, Geog Sci, Bristol, Avon, England.
   [Coxon, Gemma; Freer, Jim; Wagener, Thorsten] Univ Bristol, Cabot Inst, Bristol, Avon, England.
   [Daliakopoulos, Ioannis] Hellen Mediterranean Univ, Dept Agr, Iraklion, NE, Greece.
   [Delus, Claire; Francois, Didier] Univ Lorraine, LOTERR Ctr Rech Geog, Metz, France.
   [Esposito, Giuseppe; Petrucci, Olga] CNR IRPI, Res Inst Geohydrol Protect, Cosenza, Italy.
   [Freer, Jim] Univ Saskatchewan, Ctr Hydrol, Canmore, AB, Canada.
   [Gain, Animesh K.] Murdoch Univ, Environm & Conservat Sci, Perth, WA 6150, Australia.
   [Grillakis, Manolis] Fdn Res & Technol Hellas, Inst Mediterranean Studies, Lab Geophys Remote Sensing & Archaeoenvironm, Iraklion, NE, Greece.
   [Guzman, Diego A.] Pontificia Bolivariana Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
   [Huning, Laurie S.] Calif State Univ Long Beach, Dept Civil Engn & Construct Engn Management, Long Beach, CA USA.
   [Ionita, Monica; Nagavciuc, Viorica] Helmholtz Ctr Polar & Marine Res, Alfred Wegener Inst, Paleoclimate Dynam Grp, Bremerhaven, Germany.
   [Kharlamov, Maxim; Sazonov, Alexey] Russian Acad Sci, Water Problem Inst, Moscow, Russia.
   [Khoi, Dao Nguyen; Nhi, Pham Thi Thao] Univ Sci, Fac Environm, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
   [Kieboom, Natalie; Mathew-Richards, Hannah] Environm Agcy, Bristol, England.
   [Koutroulis, Aristeidis] Tech Univ Crete, Sch Chem & Environm Engn, Khania, Greece.
   [Mobini, Shifteh] Trelleborg Municipal, Water & Wastewater Dept, Trelleborg, Sweden.
   [Lavado-Casimiro, Waldo] Serv Nacl Meteorol & Hidrol Peru SENAMHI, Lima, Peru.
   [LLasat, Maria Carmen] Univ Barcelona, Dept Appl Phys, Barcelona, Spain.
   [LLasat, Maria Carmen] Univ Barcelona, Water Res Inst, Barcelona, Spain.
   [Macdonald, David; McKenzie, Andrew] British Geol Survey, Wallingford, Oxon, England.
   [Di Baldassarre, Giuliano; Mard, Johanna; Savelli, Elisa] Ctr Nat Hazards & Disaster Sci CNDS, Uppsala, Sweden.
   [Di Baldassarre, Giuliano; Mard, Johanna; Savelli, Elisa] Uppsala Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Uppsala, Sweden.
   [Mejia, Alfonso] Penn State Univ, Civil & Environm Engn, University Pk, PA USA.
   [Mendiondo, Eduardo Mario; Souza, Felipe Augusto Arguello] Univ Sao Paulo, Escola Engn Sao Carlos, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
   [Mens, Marjolein] Deltares, Dept Water Resources & Delta Management, Delft, Netherlands.
   [Mobini, Shifteh; Nagavciuc, Viorica; Soerensen, Johanna] Lund Univ, Dept Water Resources Engn, Lund, Sweden.
   [Mohor, Guilherme Samprogna; Wagener, Thorsten] Univ Potsdam, Inst Environm Sci & Geog, Potsdam, Germany.
   [Ionita, Monica] Tefan Cel Mare Univ, Fac Forestry, Forest Biometr Lab, Suceava, Romania.
   [Ngo-Duc, Thanh] Univ Sci & Technol Hanoi USTH, Vietnam Acad Sci & Technol, Hanoi, Vietnam.
   [Nguyen, Huynh Thi Thao; Nhi, Pham Thi Thao; Quan, Nguyen Hong; Tran, Thi Van Thu] Vietnam Natl Univ Ho Chi Minh City VNU HCM, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
   [Khoi, Dao Nguyen; Quan, Nguyen Hong] Vietnam Natl Univ Ho Chi Minh City VNU HCM, Inst Circular Econ Dev, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
   [Quintana-Segui, Pere] Ramon Llull Univ, CSIC, Observ Ebre OE, Roquetes, Spain.
   [Razavi, Saman] Univ Saskatchewan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
   [Razavi, Saman] Australian Natl Univ, Inst Math Sci, Inst Water Futures, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
   [Riegel, Jannik] Magdeburg Stendal Univ Appl Sci, Magdeburg, Germany.
   [Sadik, Md Shibly] Embassy Kingdom Netherlands, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
   [Sharma, Sanjib] Penn State Univ, Earth & Environm Syst Inst, University Pk, PA USA.
   [Szalinska, Wiwiana; Tokarczyk, Tamara] Natl Res Inst, Inst Meteorol & Water Management, Warsaw, Poland.
   [Tang, Qiuhong; Wang, Yueling] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Proc, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Tian, Fuqiang] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Hydraul Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Tovar, Carolina] Royal Bot Gardens Kew, Surrey, England.
   [van Huijgevoort, Marjolein H. J.] KWR Water Res Inst, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
   [van Vliet, Michelle T. H.] Univ Utrecht, Dept Phys Geog, Utrecht, Netherlands.
   [Wagener, Thorsten; Wendt, Doris E.] Univ Bristol, Civil Engn, Bristol, Avon, England.
   [Wickham, Elliot] Univ Nebraska, Sch Nat Resources, Lincoln, NE USA.
   [Yang, Long] Nanjing Univ, Sch Geog & Ocean Sci, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
   [Schroeter, Kai] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Leichtweiss Inst Hydraul Engn & Water Resources, Div Hydrol & River Basin Management, Braunschweig, Germany.
   [Frappart, Frederic] INRAE, Bordeaux Sci Agro, ISPA, Villenave Dornon, France.
   [Ionita, Monica] Romanian Acad, Emil Racovita Inst Speleol, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
   [Ridolfi, Elena] Sapienza Univ Roma, Dipartimento Ingn Civile Edile & Ambientale, Rome, Italy.
   [Ward, Philip J.] Deltares, Dept Climate Adaptat & Disaster Risk Reduct, Delft, Netherlands.
C3 Helmholtz Association; Helmholtz-Center Potsdam GFZ German Research
   Center for Geosciences; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; University of
   Houston System; University of Houston; Lomonosov Moscow State
   University; University of California System; University of California
   Irvine; Istanbul Technical University; Universidad de La Frontera;
   University of Saskatchewan; Global Institute for Water Security;
   Universite de Toulouse; Universite Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier; Centre
   National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Institut de Recherche pour
   le Developpement (IRD); Laboratoire d'Etudes en Geophysique et
   oceanographie spatiales; Deltares; University of Birmingham; National
   Research & Innovation Agency of Indonesia (BRIN); Imperial College
   London; Beykent University; Istanbul Technical University; University of
   Freiburg; University of Bristol; University of Bristol; Hellenic
   Mediterranean University; Universite de Lorraine; Consiglio Nazionale
   delle Ricerche (CNR); Istituto di Ricerca per la Protezione
   Idrogeologica (IRPI-CNR); University of Saskatchewan; Murdoch
   University; Foundation for Research & Technology - Hellas (FORTH);
   Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana; California State University System;
   California State University Long Beach; Helmholtz Association; Alfred
   Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar & Marine Research; Russian
   Academy of Sciences; Institute of Water Problems of the Russian Academy
   of Sciences; Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNUHCM)
   System; VNU-HCM University of Science (VNUHCM-US); Technical University
   of Crete; Servicio Nacional de Meteorologia Hidrologia del Peru
   (SENAMHI); University of Barcelona; University of Barcelona; UK Research
   & Innovation (UKRI); Natural Environment Research Council (NERC); NERC
   British Geological Survey; Centre of Natural Hazards & Disaster Science
   (CNDS); Uppsala University; Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher
   Education (PCSHE); Pennsylvania State University; Pennsylvania State
   University - University Park; Universidade de Sao Paulo; Deltares; Lund
   University; University of Potsdam; Vietnam Academy of Science &
   Technology (VAST); University of Science & Technology of Hanoi (USTH);
   Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNUHCM) System; Vietnam
   National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNUHCM) System; Universitat Ramon
   Llull; Ebre Observatory; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas
   (CSIC); University of Saskatchewan; Australian National University;
   Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education (PCSHE);
   Pennsylvania State University; Pennsylvania State University -
   University Park; Institute of Meteorology & Water Management; Chinese
   Academy of Sciences; Institute of Geographic Sciences & Natural
   Resources Research, CAS; Tsinghua University; Royal Botanic Gardens,
   Kew; Utrecht University; University of Bristol; University of Nebraska
   System; University of Nebraska Lincoln; Nanjing University; Braunschweig
   University of Technology; INRAE; Romanian Academy; Emil Racovita
   Institute of Speleology; Sapienza University Rome; Deltares
RP Kretibich, H (corresponding author), GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci, Sect Hydrol, Potsdam, Germany.
EM heidi.kreibich@gfz-potsdam.de
RI Aksoy, Hafzullah/G-7222-2011; Stahl, Kerstin/I-8138-2012; Yang,
   Long/G-3263-2013; Llasat, Maria/AAB-7873-2020; Ngo-Duc,
   Thanh/AAY-2945-2021; Steinhausen, Max/AAC-9292-2019; Vorogushyn,
   Sergiy/B-9743-2014; Van Loon, Anne/ADL-7862-2022; casimiro,
   lavado/A-4181-2012; Ward, Philip/E-6208-2010; 李, 洪毅/AAJ-3300-2020;
   Grillakis, Manolis/I-3582-2019; Sazonov, Alexey/P-3702-2014; Mendiondo,
   Eduardo/C-7317-2012; Nguyen, HuuTung/AAD-6670-2019; Mazzoleni,
   Maurizio/O-2566-2016; Abeshu, Guta/IAY-2148-2023; çavuş,
   yonca/AAL-3074-2020; Svetlana, Agafonova/H-6689-2012; Razavi,
   Saman/L-3725-2013; Khoi, Dao/G-8707-2011; Tovar, Carolina/AAT-7070-2020;
   Sharma, Sanjib/R-4989-2019; Koutroulis, Aristeidis/O-9601-2016;
   Biancamaria, Sylvain/ABI-2162-2020; Mård, Johanna/B-8555-2016;
   AghaKouchak, Amir/ABH-2495-2022; Kreibich, Heidi/HNR-9624-2023; Gain,
   Animesh/AGN-4431-2022; Nagavciuc, Viorica/AAJ-4642-2020; Sörensen,
   Johanna/AAG-3189-2019; Buytaert, Wouter/AFU-2595-2022; Frappart,
   Frédéric/AAB-8558-2019; Samprogna Mohor, Guilherme/AAZ-7687-2021;
   Schroter, Kai/B-1482-2013; Bradley, Chris/B-6079-2011; petrucci,
   olga/B-1427-2010; Kreibich, Heidi/G-9408-2012; Di Baldassarre,
   Giuliano/C-7304-2009; Guzman Arias, Diego Alejandro/D-4528-2014;
   ESPOSITO, GIUSEPPE/M-4178-2015; Zambrano-Bigiarini,
   Mauricio/C-7855-2012; Alvarez Garreton, Camila/M-1232-2016; Mazzoleni,
   Maurizio/F-5362-2018; Tian, Fuqiang/M-9958-2013
OI Samprogna Mohor, Guilherme/0000-0003-2348-6181; Schroter,
   Kai/0000-0002-3173-7019; Bradley, Chris/0000-0003-4042-867X; Wendt,
   Doris Elise/0000-0003-2315-7871; Gain, Animesh K./0000-0003-3814-693X;
   Capewell, Lucinda/0000-0002-2765-5854; Aksoy,
   Hafzullah/0000-0001-5807-5660; petrucci, olga/0000-0001-6918-1135; Van
   Loon, Anne F./0000-0003-2308-0392; Barendrecht, Marlies
   H/0000-0002-3825-0123; Kreibich, Heidi/0000-0001-6274-3625; Coxon,
   Gemma/0000-0002-8837-460X; Di Baldassarre, Giuliano/0000-0002-8180-4996;
   Guzman Arias, Diego Alejandro/0000-0003-1071-9767; ESPOSITO,
   GIUSEPPE/0000-0001-5638-657X; Zambrano-Bigiarini,
   Mauricio/0000-0002-9536-643X; Ward, Philip/0000-0001-7702-7859; Alvarez
   Garreton, Camila/0000-0002-5381-4863; Mazzoleni,
   Maurizio/0000-0002-0913-9370; Frappart, Frederic/0000-0002-4661-8274;
   Tian, Fuqiang/0000-0001-9414-7019; Couasnon, Anais/0000-0001-9372-841X;
   Sorensen, Johanna Lykke/0000-0002-2312-4917
FU European Research Council (ERC); Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster
   Science (CNDS) in Sweden; Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award;
   Alexander von Humboldt Foundation; Global Water Futures program,
   University of Saskatchewan; DAAD "Research Grants - Bi-nationally
   Supervised Doctoral Degrees/Cotutelle" Program; Fulbright Academic
   Research Scholarship, Istanbul Technical University; Scientific and
   Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK); Vietnam National
   Foundation for Science and Technology Development; National Natural
   Science Foundation of China; Netherlands Organisation for Scientific
   Research (NWO); MYRIAD-EU project; European Union's Horizon 2020
   research and innovation programme [771678]; Swedish Research Council
   Formas; University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural
   Resources California Institute for Water Resources [WM170042]; US
   Geological Survey; California State University Water Resources and
   Policy Initiatives; NWO; Marie Sklodowska Curie Global Fellowship of the
   European Commission [MUA-2019-42094]; Murdoch University, Australia;
   Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate [105.06-2019.20,
   ERC-2020-StG948601]; Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science
   (CNDS) [105.06-2021.14, 41730645, G21AP10611-00]; UK Natural Environment
   Research Council [41790424]; UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship; Integrated
   Modelling Program for Canada [92047301]; NUFFIC/NICHE VNM 104 project;
   Netherlands Government; Vietnam National University-Ho Chi Minh City
   [016.161.324]; Netherlands Scientific Organisation (NWO); European
   Research Council (ERC); Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM)
   project - US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of
   Biological and Environmental Research [101003276]; C3RiskMed research
   project - Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
   MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033;  [787419];  [NE/S013210/1]; 
   [9MR/V022857/10];  [VI.Vidi.193.019];  [PID2020-113638RB-C22]; FLF
   [MR/V022857/1] Funding Source: UKRI; NERC [NE/L010399/1, bgs06003,
   NE/S013210/1] Funding Source: UKRI
FX Elisa Savelli received funding from the European Research Council (ERC)
   within the project "HydroSocialExtremes: Uncovering the Mutual Shaping
   of Hydrological Extremes and Society" (ERC Consolidator Grant, grant no.
   771678). Elena Ridolfi was supported by the Centre of Natural Hazards
   and Disaster Science (CNDS) in Sweden. Thorsten Wagener was partially
   supported by a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award(WM170042) and
   by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation in the framework of the
   Alexander von Humboldt Professorship endowed by the German Federal
   Ministry of Education and Research. Jim Freer was partly supported by
   the Global Water Futures program, University of Saskatchewan. Yonca
   Cavus was supported by the DAAD "Research Grants - Bi-nationally
   Supervised Doctoral Degrees/Cotutelle" Program. Hafzullah Aksoy
   performed a portion of his contribution to this study during his stay at
   the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, USA, supported by a
   Fulbright Academic Research Scholarship, Istanbul Technical University
   (project no. MUA-2019-42094), and the Scientific and Technological
   Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK). Dao Nguyen Khoi was supported by
   the Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development
   (grant no. 105.06-2019.20). Qiuhong Tang was supported by the National
   Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 41730645, 41790424).
   Philip Ward was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific
   Research (NWO) (VIDI; grant no. 016.161.324) and the MYRIAD-EU project,
   which received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research
   and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 101003276). Maurizio
   Mazzoleni was supported by the Swedish Research Council Formas and the
   Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science (CNDS) in Sweden. Laurie
   Huning was partially supported by the University of California, Division
   of Agriculture and Natural Resources California Institute for Water
   Resources and US Geological Survey (grant no. G21AP10611-00) and a
   California State University Water Resources and Policy Initiatives
   grant. Anais Couasnon was supported by a VIDI grant from NWO that was
   awarded to Philip Ward (grant no. 016.161.324). Marleen de Ruiter was
   supported by the MYRIAD-EU project, which received funding from the
   European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant
   agreement no. 101003276). Animesh K. Gain was financially supported by
   the Marie Sklodowska Curie Global Fellowship of the European Commission
   (grant agreement no. 787419) and Murdoch University, Australia. Liduin
   Bos-Burgering and Marjolein Mens were supported by the Deltares research
   program onwater resources, funded by the Dutch Ministry of Economic
   Affairs and Climate. Fuqiang Tian was partly supported by the National
   Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 92047301).Johanna Mard
   was supported by the Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science
   (CNDS). Wouter Buytaert acknowledges funding from the UK Natural
   Environment Research Council (grant no. NE/S013210/1). Gemma Coxon was
   funded by a UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship award 9MR/V022857/10. Saman
   Razavi, Hayley Carlson, and Laila Balkhi were supported by the
   Integrated Modelling Program for Canada. Huynh Thi Thao Nguyen was
   supported by the NUFFIC/NICHE VNM 104 project, which was co-funded by
   the Netherlands Government and Vietnam National University-Ho Chi Minh
   City. Michelle van Vliet was financially supported by a VIDI grant
   (project no. VI.Vidi.193.019) of the Netherlands Scientific Organisation
   (NWO). Anne Van Loon was supported by the European Research Council
   (ERC) project "PerfectSTORM: Storylines of future extremes"
   (ERC-2020-StG948601). Guta Worku Abeshu and Hong-Yi Li were supported as
   part of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) project, funded by
   the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and
   Environmental Research. Thanh Ngo-Duc was supported by the Vietnam
   National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (grant no.
   105.06-2021.14). Maria Carmen Llasat was supported by the C3RiskMed
   research project(Grant PID2020-113638RB-C22) funded by the Spanish
   Ministry of Science and Innovation MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033.
CR [Anonymous], 2013, RUNOFF PREDICTION UN
   [Anonymous], 2014, Bayesian data analysis
   Barendrecht MH, 2019, WATER RESOUR RES, V55, P1312, DOI 10.1029/2018WR024128
   Barredo JI, 2009, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V9, P97, DOI 10.5194/nhess-9-97-2009
   Blöschl G, 2015, WIRES WATER, V2, P329, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1079
   Blöschl G, 2019, HYDROLOG SCI J, V64, P1141, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2019.1620507
   Bouwer LM, 2011, B AM METEOROL SOC, V92, P39, DOI 10.1175/2010BAMS3092.1
   Brown AE, 2005, J HYDROL, V310, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.12.010
   Bubeck P, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P3507, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-3507-2012
   Danard M, 2003, NAT HAZARDS, V28, P407, DOI 10.1023/A:1022990310410
   de Man H, 2014, WATER RES, V48, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.022
   de Ruiter MC, 2022, ISCIENCE, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104720
   de Ruiter MC, 2021, EARTHS FUTURE, V9, DOI 10.1029/2020EF001531
   Di Baldassarre G, 2019, WATER RESOUR RES, V55, P6327, DOI 10.1029/2018WR023901
   Di Baldassarre G, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P4770, DOI 10.1002/2014WR016416
   Downton MW, 2005, NAT HAZARDS, V35, P211, DOI 10.1007/s11069-004-4808-4
   Duan Q, 2006, J HYDROL, V320, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.031
   European Union, 2007, Official Journal of the European Union, Luxembourg
   Ferrer M., 2017, SCI DISASTER RISK MA, DOI [10.2788/842809,ISBN978-92-79-60679-3, DOI 10.2788/842809,ISBN]
   Gall M, 2009, B AM METEOROL SOC, V90, P799, DOI 10.1175/2008BAMS2721.1
   Gaume E, 2009, J HYDROL, V367, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.028
   Hayes M, 2011, B AM METEOROL SOC, V92, P485, DOI 10.1175/2010BAMS3103.1
   Huning LS, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P19753, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1915921117
   Huning LS, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P10932, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1805953115
   Jongman B, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, pE2271, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1414439112
   Kaspersen PS, 2015, P INT ASS HYDROL SCI, V370, P21, DOI 10.5194/piahs-370-21-2015
   Kreibich H., 2023, PANTA RHEI BENCHMARK, DOI [10.5880/GFZ.4.4.2023.001, DOI 10.5880/GFZ.4.4.2023.001]
   Kreibich H, 2022, NATURE, V608, P80, DOI 10.1038/s41586-022-04917-5
   Kreibich H, 2019, HYDROLOG SCI J, V64, P1, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2018.1558367
   Kreibich H, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P953, DOI 10.1002/2017EF000606
   Kron W, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P535, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-535-2012
   Kuhlicke C., WIREs Water
   McMillan H, 2016, HYDROLOG SCI J, V61, P1174, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2016.1159308
   Mechler R, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V133, P23, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1141-0
   Merz B, 2012, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V16, P1379, DOI 10.5194/hess-16-1379-2012
   Merz B., 2012, Changes in Flood Risk in Europe, V10, P435
   Montanari A, 2013, HYDROLOG SCI J, V58, P1256, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2013.809088
   Mostert E, 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V22, P317, DOI 10.5194/hess-22-317-2018
   Neumayer E, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.10.004
   Okoli C, 2004, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V42, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
   Prosdocimi I, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P4244, DOI 10.1002/2015WR017065
   Razavi S, 2020, HYDROL PROCESS, V34, P1996, DOI 10.1002/hyp.13723
   Sairam N, 2019, EARTHS FUTURE, V7, P235, DOI 10.1029/2018EF000994
   Schoppa L., 2023, IN PRESS
   Schoppa L, 2022, HYDROLOG SCI J, V67, P1623, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2022.2095207
   Stahl K, 2016, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V16, P801, DOI 10.5194/nhess-16-801-2016
   Staudinger M, 2014, WATER RESOUR RES, V50, P7861, DOI 10.1002/2013WR015143
   Stein L, 2020, HYDROL PROCESS, V34, P1514, DOI 10.1002/hyp.13678
   Tallaksen LM, 2004, DEV WATER SCI, V48, P3
   Tarasova L, 2019, WIRES WATER, V6, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1353
   Teuling AJ, 2013, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V40, P2071, DOI 10.1002/grl.50495
   UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction), 2017, SEND FRAM TERM DIS R
   Van Loon AF, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5def
   Van Loon AF, 2019, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V23, P1725, DOI 10.5194/hess-23-1725-2019
   Van Loon AF, 2016, NAT GEOSCI, V9, P89, DOI 10.1038/ngeo2646
   Ward PJ., 2020, Water Security, V11, P100070, DOI [10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100070, DOI 10.1016/J.WASEC.2020.100070]
   Wilhite D. A., 1985, Water International, V10, P111, DOI 10.1080/02508068508686328
   WMO (World Meteorological Organization), 2006, Drought Monitoring and Early Warning: Concepts, Progress and Future Challenges
NR 58
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 5
U2 30
PU COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
PI GOTTINGEN
PA BAHNHOFSALLEE 1E, GOTTINGEN, 37081, GERMANY
SN 1866-3508
EI 1866-3516
J9 EARTH SYST SCI DATA
JI Earth Syst. Sci. Data
PD MAY 16
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 5
BP 2009
EP 2023
DI 10.5194/essd-15-2009-2023
PG 15
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA G9UL8
UT WOS:000992519600001
OA Green Submitted, gold, Green Published, Green Accepted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Ivetic, V
   Tsakaldimi, M
   Ganatsas, P
   Jankovic, IK
   Devetakovic, J
AF Ivetic, Vladan
   Tsakaldimi, Marianthi
   Ganatsas, Petros
   Kerkez Jankovic, Ivona
   Devetakovic, Jovana
TI Freezing and Heating Tolerance of <i>Pinus nigra</i> Seedlings from
   Three South to North Balkan Provenances
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE frost hardiness; global warming; drought; climate adaptive
   reforestation; seed source; Austrian pine
ID COLD-HARDINESS; GROWTH; DROUGHT; ADAPTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; CESSATION;
   ARNOLD
AB To meet the restoration and reforestation goals in the changing environment, the translocation of genotypes and species northward and upward need to be considered to a great extent. Pinus nigra is a genetically diverse, drought sensitive species, with cold hardiness comparable to other tree species under the same climatic conditions. This study tested frost hardiness (whole plant freezing test-WPFT, and electric conductivity-EC test), and heat tolerance (heat tolerance test) of P. nigra seedlings from two southern Greek provenances (Kalamata and Grevena) and one northern Serbian provenance (Sargan) to better understand the potential of seed transfer from the south to the north of the species distribution in the Balkan peninsula. The results showed that, that for all studied provenances, the damage was great; the index of injury (Ii) at -18 degrees C was ranged from 49 to 54.5 (measured by the EC method) and the percentage of injured tissues ranged from 80-90% (measured by visual observation). For all studied provenances, a sharp increase in damages was observed with the fall of temperature from -5 and -18 degrees C and the time after exposure. The WPFT results showed that the highest tolerance to freezing (-18 degrees C) was presented by seedlings from the northern (Sargan) provenance; however, no significant differences were statistically detected among the studied provenances. The heat and drought-treated seedlings, from both provenances, presented significantly highler foliar damages than only drought-treated ones. For seedlings from both contrasting provenances (Grevena and Sargan), exposure to moderate heat (45 degrees C) and short drought did present damages but without significant difference between them. Considering freezing and heating tolerance, Greek provenances of P. nigra (i.e., Grevena region) can be successfully used in Serbian forestation and restoration programs. The present study makes a contribution towards P. nigra reforestation with practical implications for abiotic stress (frost, heat drought) tolerance among southern and northern provenances and could be valuable to determine the suitable provenances for reforestation programs and assisted population migration under climatic change scenarios.
C1 [Ivetic, Vladan; Kerkez Jankovic, Ivona; Devetakovic, Jovana] Univ Belgrade, Fac Forestry, Beograd 11030, Serbia.
   [Tsakaldimi, Marianthi; Ganatsas, Petros] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Lab Silviculture, Dept Forestry & Nat Environm, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece.
C3 University of Belgrade; Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
RP Ivetic, V (corresponding author), Univ Belgrade, Fac Forestry, Beograd 11030, Serbia.
EM vladan.ivetic@sfb.bg.ac.rs; marian@for.auth.gr; pgana@for.auth.gr;
   ivonakerkez@gmail.com; jovana.devetakovic@sfb.bg.ac.rs
RI Tsakaldimi, Marianthi/AFF-1478-2022; Devetaković, Jovana/AAR-5590-2021;
   Ivetic, Vladan/U-1544-2019
OI Ivetic, Vladan/0000-0003-0587-1422; Devetakovic,
   Jovana/0000-0002-3840-6458; Kerkez Jankovic, Ivona/0000-0002-2070-158X
FU Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the
   Republic of Serbia [451-03-9/2021-14/200169]
FX This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and
   Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia according agreement
   No. 451-03-9/2021-14/200169 from 05.02.2021.
CR [Anonymous], 2019, HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL
   Tíscar PA, 2018, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V409, P719, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.014
   Breed MF, 2013, CONSERV GENET, V14, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10592-012-0425-z
   Burr KE, 2001, TREE PHYSIOL SER, V1, P369
   Climent J, 2009, ANN FOREST SCI, V66, DOI 10.1051/forest/2009016
   Colombo S.J., 1984, Frost hardiness testing: an operational manual for use with extended greenhouse culture
   Critchfield WB, 1966, Geographic distribution of the pines of the world
   FLINT HL, 1967, CAN J PLANT SCI, V47, P229, DOI 10.4141/cjps67-043
   Ganatsas P., 2010, NEW APPROACHES RESTO, P7
   Glerum C., 1984, P EV SEED QUAL PRINC
   HAYS KL, 1991, HORTSCIENCE, V26, P180, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.26.2.180
   Isajev V., 2004, EUFORGEN Technical guidelines for genetic conservation and usefor European black pine Pinus nigra
   Ivetic V., 2020, SUMSKI REPROD MATERI
   Ivetic V., 2013, Practicum of seed science, nursery production and afforestation
   Ivetic V., 2016, REFORESTA, P178, DOI [DOI 10.21750/10.21750/REFOR.1.10.10, 10.21750/REFOR.1.10.10, DOI 10.21750/REFOR.1.10.10]
   Ivetic V., 2017, REFORESTA, DOI [10.21750/REFOR.4.04.43, DOI 10.21750/REFOR.4.04.43]
   Ivetic V, 2017, IFOREST, V10, P99, DOI 10.3832/ifor1722-009
   Janssen E, 2018, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V412, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.01.047
   Johnson DM, 2011, TREE PHYSIOL-NETH, V4, P65, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1242-3_3
   Kreyling J, 2012, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V78, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.12.026
   Lavender D.P., 1984, Forestry Nursery Manual: Production of Bareroot Seedlings, VVolume 11, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-6110-4_14
   Lu PX, 2003, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V178, P329, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00481-4
   Marchi M., 2015, Ann. Silvic. Res., V39, DOI [10.12899/asr-1066, DOI 10.12899/ASR-1066]
   Martín-Benito D, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P967, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.12.001
   Mataruga M, 2012, NEW FOREST, V43, P791, DOI 10.1007/s11056-012-9351-7
   Móricz N, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9070414
   Piermattei A, 2012, ANN FOREST SCI, V69, P509, DOI 10.1007/s13595-012-0207-2
   PRENTICE IC, 1992, J BIOGEOGR, V19, P117, DOI 10.2307/2845499
   Prober SM, 2015, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V3, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2015.00065
   Repo T, 2000, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V14, P456, DOI 10.1007/s004680000059
   Ritchie G., SEEDLING QUALITY TES
   Sánchez-Salguero R, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V310, P956, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.050
   Santini F, 2019, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V166, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103828
   Sarsu F., 2018, PREFIELD SCREENING P, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-77338-4_2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-77338-4_2]
   Savolainen O, 2004, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V197, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.006
   Semerci A, 2021, NEW FOREST, V52, P621, DOI 10.1007/s11056-020-09815-0
   South D. B., 2006, General Technical Report - Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, P441
   Stilinovic S., 1991, AFFORESTATION
   Strimbeck GR, 2007, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V21, P557, DOI 10.1007/s00468-007-0151-1
   Taïbi K, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V171, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.014
   Thiel D, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V270, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.034
   Tsakaldimi M, 2013, NEW FOREST, V44, P327, DOI 10.1007/s11056-012-9339-3
NR 42
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 1
U2 18
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD AUG
PY 2021
VL 13
IS 16
AR 9290
DI 10.3390/su13169290
PG 11
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA UH6NC
UT WOS:000690044000001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sinha, P
   Coville, RC
   Hirabayashi, S
   Lim, B
   Endreny, TA
   Nowak, DJ
AF Sinha, Paramita
   Coville, Robert C.
   Hirabayashi, Satoshi
   Lim, Brian
   Endreny, Theodore A.
   Nowak, David J.
TI Modeling lives saved from extreme heat by urban tree cover?
SO ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
LA English
DT Article
DE Ecosystem services; Heat-related mortality; Vulnerability; Health
   impacts; Economic valuation; Human well-being; Urban heat island;
   Modeling temperature changes; i-Tree
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; UNITED-STATES; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; AIR-QUALITY;
   MORTALITY; HEALTH; TEMPERATURE; EMISSIONS; CANOPY; OZONE
AB Urban tree cover contributes to human well-being through a variety of ecosystem services. In this study, we focus on the role that trees can play in reducing temperature during warm seasons and associated impacts on human health and well-being. We introduce a method for quantifying and valuing changes in premature mortality from extreme heat due to the changes in urban tree cover and apply this method to Baltimore City, Maryland. The model i-Tree Cool Air uses a water and energy balance to estimate hourly changes in air temperature due to alternative scenarios of tree cover applied across 653 Census Block Groups. The changes in temperature are applied to existing temperature?mortality models to estimate changes in health outcomes and associated values. Existing tree cover in Baltimore is estimated to reduce annual mortality by 543 deaths as compared to a 0% tree cover scenario. Increasing the area of current tree cover by 10% of each Census Block Group reduced baseline annual mortality by 83 to 247 deaths (valued at $0.68 ?2.0 billion applying Value of Statistical Life estimates). Over half of the reduced mortality is from the over 65 year age group, who are among the most vulnerable to extreme heat. Reductions in air temperature due to increased tree cover were greatest in downtown Baltimore where tree cover is relatively low and impervious cover is relatively high. However, the greatest reductions in mortality occurred in the outskirts of Baltimore where a greater number of people who are over 65 years in age reside. Quantifying and valuing the health benefits of changes in air temperatures due to increased tree cover can inform climate adaptation and mitigation plans by decision makers. Developing adaptation strategies to effectively address these issues will become increasingly important in the future under changing climates and an aging population.
C1 [Sinha, Paramita; Lim, Brian] RTI Int, 3040 E Cornwallis Rd, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA.
   [Coville, Robert C.; Hirabayashi, Satoshi] US Forest Serv, USDA, Davey Inst, Davey Tree Expert Co,SUNY ESF, 5 Moon Lib, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA.
   [Endreny, Theodore A.] SUNY ESF, Dept Environm Resources Engn, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA.
   [Nowak, David J.] US Forest Serv, USDA, Forest Inventory & Anal, SUNYESF, 5 Moon Lib, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA.
C3 Research Triangle Institute; United States Department of Agriculture
   (USDA); United States Forest Service; State University of New York
   (SUNY) System; State University of New York (SUNY) College of
   Environmental Science & Forestry; State University of New York (SUNY)
   System; State University of New York (SUNY) College of Environmental
   Science & Forestry; United States Department of Agriculture (USDA);
   United States Forest Service
RP Sinha, P (corresponding author), RTI Int, 3040 E Cornwallis Rd, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA.
EM psinha@rti.org
RI Endreny, Theodore/H-4743-2019
OI sinha, paramita/0000-0001-5667-9428; Endreny,
   Theodore/0000-0002-1891-261X
FU 2018 U.S. Forest Service National Urban and Community Forestry Challenge
   CostShare Grant Program [18DG-11132544_014]; RTI internal grant
FX We acknowledge financial support from the 2018 U.S. Forest Service
   National Urban and Community Forestry Challenge CostShare Grant Program
   (Federal Award Identification Number 18DG11132544?014) and an RTI
   internal grant. We thank Jennifer Richkus for coordination support for
   the project collaborators.
CR Akbari H, 2001, SOL ENERGY, V70, P295, DOI 10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00089-X
   Analitis A, 2014, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V25, P15, DOI 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31828ac01b
   [Anonymous], 2018, MORT RISK VAL
   APHA, 2018, DIFF HEAT REL MORT C
   Balbus JM, 2009, J OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V51, P33, DOI 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318193e12e
   Basu R, 2005, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V16, P58, DOI 10.1097/01.ede.0000147117.88386.fe
   Basu R, 2002, EPIDEMIOL REV, V24, P190, DOI 10.1093/epirev/mxf007
   Benmarhnia T, 2015, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V26, P781, DOI 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000375
   Bolund P, 1999, ECOL ECON, V29, P293, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0
   Bowler DE, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V97, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2015, NAT CTR HLTH STAT 20
   Crimmins AllisonJ., 2016, IMPACTS CLIMATE CHAN
   Fann N., 2016, HUMAN HEALTH THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON, P69, DOI DOI 10.7930/J0GQ6VP6
   Gamble JL, 2013, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V121, P15, DOI [10.1289/ehp.1205223, 10.1289/ehp.121-a15]
   Gamble JL., 2016, The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment, P247, DOI [10.7930/J0Q81B0T, DOI 10.7930/J0Q81B0T]
   Gasparrini A, 2017, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V1, pE360, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30156-0
   Gómez-Baggethun E, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019
   Guo YM, 2018, PLOS MED, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002629
   Haase D, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P407, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0503-1
   Hirabayashi S., 2016, Surface and Upper Weather Pre processor for i Tree Eco and Hydro
   Jhun I, 2014, ENVIRON INT, V73, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2014.07.009
   Kaiser Reinhard, 2007, Am J Public Health, V97 Suppl 1, pS158, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2006.100081
   Kalkstein LS, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V56, P113, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9552-3
   Kondo MC, 2020, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V4, pE149, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30058-9
   Kovats RS, 2008, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V29, P41, DOI 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090843
   Leff M., 2016, SUSTAINABLE URBAN FO, DOI DOI 10.1023/B:LAND.0000030441.15628.D6
   Madrigano J, 2015, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V14, DOI 10.1186/1476-069X-14-3
   Medina-Ramón M, 2007, OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V64, P827, DOI 10.1136/oem.2007.033175
   Medina-Ramón M, 2006, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V114, P1331, DOI 10.1289/ehp.9074
   Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (MRLC), 2015, NAT LAND COV DAT 200
   National Public Radio (NPR), 2019, HEAT HLTH AM CIT RIS
   Newcomer-Johnson T., 2020, EPA600R20267
   Nowak D.J., 2007, Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast, P25, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-4289-82
   Nowak D.J., 2010, Air quality effects of urban trees and parks
   Nowak DJ, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V21, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.12.004
   Nowak DJ, 2014, ENVIRON POLLUT, V193, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.05.028
   Nowak DJ, 2013, ENVIRON POLLUT, V178, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.050
   Nowak DJ, 2013, ENVIRON POLLUT, V178, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.019
   Nowak DJ, 2010, ENVIRON MANAGE, V46, P378, DOI 10.1007/s00267-010-9536-9
   Nowak David J., 2008, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, V34, P347
   Robine JM, 2008, CR BIOL, V331, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.crvi.2007.12.001
   Sacks JD, 2018, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V104, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.02.009
   Sailor DJ, 2011, INT J CLIMATOL, V31, P189, DOI 10.1002/joc.2106
   Sarofim M.C., 2016, The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment, P43, DOI [DOI 10.7930/J0MG7MDX, 10.7930/J0MG7MDX]
   Sherwood SC, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P9552, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0913352107
   Shindell D, 2020, GEOHEALTH, V4, DOI 10.1029/2019GH000234
   Sinha P, 2018, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V92, P608, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.08.005
   Smith TT, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V118, P811, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0659-2
   U. S. CensusBureau, 2010, 2010 TIGER LIN SHAP
   United Nations General Assembly, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203
   US Bureau of Labor Statistics, CPI INFL CALC
   Vaidyanathan A, 2020, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V69, P729, DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm6924a1
   Voorhees AS, 2011, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V45, P1450, DOI 10.1021/es102820y
   Weinberger KR, 2020, ENVIRON EPIDEMIOL, V4, DOI 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000096
   Yang Yang, 2013, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, V118, P10449, DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50803
   Ziter CD, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P7575, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1817561116
NR 56
TC 19
Z9 21
U1 5
U2 45
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0304-3800
EI 1872-7026
J9 ECOL MODEL
JI Ecol. Model.
PD JUN 1
PY 2021
VL 449
AR 109553
DI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109553
EA APR 2021
PG 19
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA RS6VM
UT WOS:000643914300002
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Liu, Z
   Balk, D
AF Liu Zhen
   Balk, Deborah
TI Urbanisation and differential vulnerability to coastal flooding among
   migrants and nonmigrants in Bangladesh
SO POPULATION SPACE AND PLACE
LA English
DT Article
DE Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (DHS); Global Human Settlement
   Layer (GHSL); low-elevation coastal zone (LECZ); migrants; urbanisation;
   vulnerability
ID SEA-LEVEL RISE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; INTERNAL MIGRATION; UNITED-STATES;
   DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; FAMILY MIGRATION; URBAN MIGRATION; DISASTER RISK;
   INEQUALITY; ADAPTATION
AB Like much of Asia, Bangladesh will see an urban transition in the coming decades. Yet, its urbanisation will be unprecedented in terms of climate vulnerabilities. Little is known about urbanisation and migrants, in the context of these vulnerabilities, in part because demographic inquiry and training (with a few notable exceptions) has only begun in the last decade to embrace new, spatial data and methods of analysis-especially those involving earth-observing satellites. This descriptive analysis examines urban change along with low-elevation coastal zone (LECZ) data as a proxy for flood exposure, using data from satellites, and integrates those features with socioeconomic characteristics and migration information from demographic and health survey data (DHS 2000-2014). We describe where urban change has occurred in the past 40 years, with a focus on understanding change occurring in LECZ areas. We then describe vulnerabilities of the households and migrants in areas of urban change from about 2004 onward, both in terms of their potential exposure to flooding and socioeconomic characteristics. We find that moderate-risk, 7-10m LECZ areas are not only more built-up than higher elevation areas, but they have also had appreciably more urban development as measured by built-up change than other areas. Although we found that poor urban households are more likely to be located in flood-prone areas, poor households were also less likely to be in areas that are built-up. The 0-6m LECZ has lower proportions of urban in-migrants, but among those migrants to cities, the flood-prone LECZ is more likely to be the destination of poor migrants. This paper suggests that climate adaptation plans should be spatially specific because poor migrants are more likely to be located in LECZ areas that are more prone to flooding.
C1 [Liu Zhen] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Sociol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Balk, Deborah] CUNY, Baruch Coll, CUNY Inst Demog Res, New York, NY 10021 USA.
   [Balk, Deborah] CUNY, Baruch Coll, Marxe Sch Publ & Int Affairs, New York, NY 10021 USA.
C3 Zhejiang University; City University of New York (CUNY) System; Baruch
   College (CUNY); City University of New York (CUNY) System; Baruch
   College (CUNY)
RP Balk, D (corresponding author), CUNY, Baruch Coll, Marxe Sch Publ & Int Affairs, CUNY Inst Demog Res, New York, NY 10021 USA.
EM zhen_liu@zju.edu.cn; deborah.balk@baruch.cuny.edu
OI Balk, Deborah/0000-0002-9028-7898; Liu, Zhen/0000-0001-5859-1585
FU Carnegie Corporation of New York [G-F-16-53680]; AXA Research Fund
FX Carnegie Corporation of New York, Grant/Award Number: G-F-16-53680; AXA
   Research Fund
CR Abu M, 2014, POPUL ENVIRON, V35, P341, DOI 10.1007/s11111-013-0191-y
   Adams H, 2016, POPUL ENVIRON, V37, P429, DOI 10.1007/s11111-015-0246-3
   Adger WN, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
   Afsar Rita., 2003, REGIONAL C MIGRATION, P22, DOI [10.1057/dev.2009.89, DOI 10.1057/DEV.2009.89]
   Ahsan R, 2011, ENVIRON JUSTICE, V4, P163, DOI 10.1089/env.2011.0005
   [Anonymous], NAT I POP RES TRAIN
   [Anonymous], THE GUARDIAN 0423
   [Anonymous], 2010, URB DEV SER KNOWL PA
   [Anonymous], 2009, POPULATION DYNAMICS
   [Anonymous], 2008, CLIM AD BERL
   [Anonymous], 2005, NAT AD PROGR ACT NAP
   Balk D., 2004, Population, Space and Place, V10, P175, DOI 10.1002/psp.328
   Balk D, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0208487
   Balk Deborah., 2009, POPULATION DYNAMICS
   Bankoff G, 2003, DISASTERS, V27, P224, DOI 10.1111/1467-7717.00230
   Bell M, 2015, POPUL SPACE PLACE, V21, P1, DOI 10.1002/psp.1848
   Bilsborrow RE, 2012, POPUL ENVIRON, V34, P113, DOI 10.1007/s11111-012-0177-1
   Birkmann J., 2007, Environmental Hazards, V7, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.04.002
   Black R., 2013, Disentangling Migration and Climate Change, P29
   Blaikie P., 2003, At risk - Natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters
   Bocquier P, 2011, DEMOGRAPHY, V48, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13524-011-0019-2
   Brockerhoff M, 1998, POPUL DEV REV, V24, P75, DOI 10.2307/2808123
   BROCKERHOFF M, 1990, DEMOGRAPHY, V27, P601, DOI 10.2307/2061573
   Brockerhoff M, 1999, INT MIGR REV, V33, P833, DOI 10.2307/2547354
   Brouwer R, 2007, RISK ANAL, V27, P313, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00884.x
   Call MA, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V46, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.008
   Carrico AR, 2019, POPUL ENVIRON, V41, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11111-019-00322-9
   Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN)/Columbia University, 2013, LOW EL COAST ZON URB
   Chen J, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P981, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0313-8
   Clark WAV, 2007, DEMOGR RES, V17, P591, DOI 10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.20
   Cooke TJ, 2009, DEMOGRAPHY, V46, P147, DOI 10.1353/dem.0.0036
   Corbane C, 2017, BIG EARTH DATA, V1, P118, DOI 10.1080/20964471.2017.1397899
   Corker J, 2017, POPUL SPACE PLACE, V23, DOI 10.1002/psp.2009
   Cutter SL, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P242, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
   Cutter SL, 2000, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V90, P713, DOI 10.1111/0004-5608.00219
   Dannecker P, 2009, POPUL SPACE PLACE, V15, P119, DOI 10.1002/psp.533
   Dasgupta S., 2009, Sea-Level-Rise and Storm Surges- A Comparative Analysis of Impacts in Developing Countries
   Dasgupta S, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V93, P379, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9499-5
   De Jong GF, 2000, POP STUD-J DEMOG, V54, P307, DOI 10.1080/713779089
   Donner W, 2008, SOC FORCES, V87, P1089
   Dorélien A, 2013, POPUL DEV REV, V39, P413, DOI 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00610.x
   EC [European Commission]UN-HABITAT, 2016, STATE EUR CIT 2016 C
   Elkies N, 2015, POPUL ENVIRON, V37, P83, DOI 10.1007/s11111-014-0225-0
   Felsenstein D, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V71, P463, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0929-y
   Gao J, 2019, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V119, P458, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.06.015
   Gesch D. B., 2018, FRONTIERS EARTH SCI, V6, P344
   Grace K, 2019, POPUL DEV REV, V45, P197, DOI 10.1111/padr.12222
   Gray CL, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P6000, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1115944109
   Hallegatte S, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P802, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1979, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1979]
   Hanson S, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P89, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9977-4
   Hassani-Mahmooei B, 2012, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V17, P763, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X12000290
   Hauer ME, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P691, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2961, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2961]
   Hinkel J, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3292, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1222469111
   Hunter LM, 2015, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V41, P377, DOI 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112223
   International Institute for the Environment and Development (IIED), 2015, POL BRIEF
   Ishtiaque A, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V86, P315, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2690-5
   Kay S, 2015, ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP, V17, P1311, DOI 10.1039/c4em00683f
   Kopp RE, 2014, EARTHS FUTURE, V2, P383, DOI 10.1002/2014EF000239
   Kulp S., 2016, FRONT EARTH SCI, V4, P4823
   Lein Haakon., 2000, NORSK GEOGRAFISK TID, V54, P122
   Lewis W. A., 1954, The Manchester School, V22, P139, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1467-9957.1954.TB00021.X, 10.1111/j.1467-9957.1954.tb00021.x., 10.1111/j.1467-9957.1954.tb00021.x]
   Leyk S, 2018, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V204, P898, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2017.08.035
   Lichter M, 2011, J COASTAL RES, V27, P757, DOI 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10-00072.1
   Lu X, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V38, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.002
   MacManus K., 2019, ANN M AM GEOPH UN DE
   Marshall R., 2013, Internal Migration in Bangladesh: Character, Drivers, and Policy Issues
   Martin M, 2014, POPUL ENVIRON, V36, P85, DOI 10.1007/s11111-014-0207-2
   Martine G., 2013, The Demography of Adaptation to Climate Change
   McGranahan G, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P17, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076960
   McLeman R, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V117, P599, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0578-2
   Melchiorri M, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10050768
   Merkens JL, 2016, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V145, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.08.009
   Montgomery M. R., 2016, International Handbook of Migration and Population Distribution, P573
   Montgomery MR, 2000, DEMOGRAPHY, V37, P155, DOI 10.2307/2648118
   Morrow B H, 1999, Int J Mass Emerg Disasters, V17, P5
   Muis S, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P379, DOI 10.1002/2016EF000430
   Muis S, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V538, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.068
   National Adaptation Plan Global Support Programme (NAP-GSP) of the United Nations Environment Programme, 2017, NAT AD PLAN PROC FOC
   Nawrotzki R. J., 2017, REGIONAL ENV CHANGE, Vn/a, P1
   Nawrotzki RJ, 2017, POPUL SPACE PLACE, V23, DOI 10.1002/psp.2033
   Nawrotzki RJ, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/114023
   Neumann B, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0118571
   New York City Department of Emergency Management, 2014, NYCS RISK LANDSC GUI
   Ngo E.B., 2001, NAT HAZARDS REV, V2, P80, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2001)2:2(80)
   NIPORT, 2009, NAT I POP RES TRAIN
   Omariba DWR, 2010, POPUL RES POLICY REV, V29, P275, DOI 10.1007/s11113-009-9140-y
   Paul SK, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V57, P477, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9631-5
   Peacock W., 2000, Hurricane Andrew and the reshaping of Miami: ethnicity, gender, and the socio-political ecology of disasters
   Pesaresi M, 2015, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V47, P837, DOI 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-7-W3-837-2015
   Pesaresi M., 2016, 27741 EUR JOINT RES, DOI [DOI 10.2788/253582, 10.2788/253582]
   Pesaresi M, 2016, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/rs8040299
   Pinchoff J, 2019, POPUL ENVIRON, V41, P235, DOI 10.1007/s11111-019-00331-8
   Rahaman MA, 2018, INT MIGR, V56, P42, DOI 10.1111/imig.12460
   Rahman HMT, 2019, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V7, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00002
   Rahman MK, 2015, PROF GEOGR, V67, P218, DOI 10.1080/00330124.2014.922020
   Rana Md. Masud Parves, 2011, Environment Development and Sustainability, V13, P237, DOI 10.1007/s10668-010-9258-4
   Rasch R, 2017, SOC SCI QUART, V98, P299, DOI 10.1111/ssqu.12274
   Rashid S. F., 2013, Disaster Risk Reduction, P51, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-4-431-54249-0
   Revi A, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P535
   Riosmena F, 2018, POPUL DEV REV, V44, P455, DOI 10.1111/padr.12158
   Rose L, 2015, AQUAT PR, V4, P532, DOI 10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.069
   Rutstein S. O., 2014, Making the demographic and health surveys wealth index comparable
   Rutstein SO., 2015, Steps to constructing the new DHS wealth index
   Rutstein SO., 2004, DHS COMP REPORTS NO, DOI [10.13140/2.1.2806.4809, DOI 10.13140/2.1.2806.4809]
   Sarkar A, 2017, ADVANCING CULTURE OF LIVING WITH LANDSLIDES, VOL 5: LANDSLIDES IN DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS, P273, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-53483-1_32
   Satterthwaite D., 2007, Adapting to climate change in urban areas: The possibilities and constraints in low-and middle-income nations, V1
   Seto KC, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, pS94, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.08.005
   Singh PK, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0044901
   Smith-Greenaway E, 2014, POPUL RES POLICY REV, V33, P873, DOI 10.1007/s11113-014-9326-9
   STARK O, 1985, AM ECON REV, V75, P173
   Tacoli C, 2011, Not only climate change: Mobility, vulnerability and socio-economic transformations in environmentally fragile areas in Bolivia, Senegal and Tanzania
   TODARO MP, 1987, POPUL DEV REV, V13, P101, DOI 10.2307/1972122
   TODARO MP, 1969, AM ECON REV, V59, P138
   Uhl JH, 2020, INT J DIGIT EARTH, V13, P22, DOI 10.1080/17538947.2018.1550120
   United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2014, WORLD URB PROSP 2014
   VanWey L, 2013, RURAL SOCIOL, V78, P29, DOI 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2012.00094.x
   VanWey LK, 2005, INT MIGR REV, V39, P141, DOI 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2005.tb00258.x
   Voeten HACM, 2010, SEX TRANSM DIS, V37, P240, DOI 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181c3f2d0
   Warner K, 2011, POPUL ENVIRON, V33, P3, DOI 10.1007/s11111-011-0150-4
   Webb G.R., 2000, NAT HAZARDS REV, V1, P83, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(83)
   Westerman A., 2017, NATL PUBLIC RADIO PA
   White M.J. y., 2005, HDB POPULATION, P311, DOI [10.1007/0-387-23106-412, DOI 10.1007/0-387-23106-412, DOI 10.1007/0-387-23106-4_12]
   Yamazaki D, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P5844, DOI 10.1002/2017GL072874
   Young A, 2013, Q J ECON, V128, P1727, DOI 10.1093/qje/qjt025
   Zhang KQ, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V225, P290, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.028
NR 125
TC 7
Z9 8
U1 3
U2 33
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1544-8444
EI 1544-8452
J9 POPUL SPACE PLACE
JI Popul. Space Place.
PD OCT
PY 2020
VL 26
IS 7
AR e2334
DI 10.1002/psp.2334
EA APR 2020
PG 22
WC Demography; Geography
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Demography; Geography
GA OL3MA
UT WOS:000527641400001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Peng, SZ
   Yu, KL
   Li, Z
   Wen, ZM
   Zhang, C
AF Peng, Shouzhang
   Yu, Kailiang
   Li, Zhi
   Wen, Zhongming
   Zhang, Chao
TI Integrating potential natural vegetation and habitat suitability into
   revegetation programs for sustainable ecosystems under future climate
   change
SO AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Potential natural vegetation; Habitat suitability; Land use adjustment;
   LPJ-GUESS; Yanhe Basin; Revegetation program
ID CHINA LOESS PLATEAU; MODEL; IMPACTS; LAND; RESTORATION; VARIABILITY;
   SENSITIVITY; SIMULATION; STRATEGIES; FORESTS
AB Global concern about the restoration of vegetation ecosystems has recently increased. Potential natural vegetation (PNV) and climate adaptation concepts should be integrated into revegetation programs to achieve sustainable ecosystems. The Yanhe Basin in the Loess Plateau of China (7687 km(2)) has been subjected to intense human activity for centuries. It was selected as the study area because vegetation degradation and restoration are occurring there. The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate whether the current vegetation pattern is appropriate, and (2) provide a restoration plan for future revegetation programs based on PNV and habitat suitability patterns simulated by the dynamic vegetation model LPJ-GUESS. Current work focused on the parameter calibration and high-resolution climate data of the model over the study area. The comparisons of model performances in the PNV pattern and productivity indicated that parameter calibration was necessary for the model application. PNV of the Yanhe Basin may shift by 21.37-29.67% from 1981-2010 to 2071-2100, mainly in the southern part. Forests may decrease and steppes may increase as the climate becomes drier in the future. Comparisons between an existing land use map and the current PNV pattern indicated that only 40.8% of the forestland was coincident with the current PNV pattern, whereas grassland was a more suitable vegetation type for the rest of the terrain. In contrast, 83.1% of the grassland aligned with the current PNV pattern. Therefore, 16.9% remains to be forested. Current forestland and grassland patterns should be adjusted to cope with future climate change. Broadleaf summer-green shrubs covered a larger area and had higher habitat suitability than forests; they might be the most suitable woody plants for revegetation of the Yanhe Basin. The applied research approach could be extended to other regions undergoing similar revegetation programs and help promote sustainable vegetation management.
C1 [Peng, Shouzhang; Wen, Zhongming; Zhang, Chao] Northwest A&F Univ, State Key Lab Soil Eros & Dryland Farming Loess P, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
   [Peng, Shouzhang; Wen, Zhongming; Zhang, Chao] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
   [Peng, Shouzhang; Wen, Zhongming; Zhang, Chao] Minist Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
   [Yu, Kailiang] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Integrat Biol, Univ Str 16, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
   [Li, Zhi] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Nat Resources & Environm, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
C3 Northwest A&F University - China; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute
   of Soil & Water Conservation (ISWC), CAS; Ministry of Water Resources;
   Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology Domain; ETH Zurich; Northwest A&F
   University - China
RP Zhang, C (corresponding author), Inst Soil & Water Conservat, 26 Xinong Rd, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
EM zhangchaolynn@163.com
RI Zhang, Chao/JCE-5490-2023; LI, ZHI/D-7204-2015
OI Peng, Shouzhang/0000-0002-2358-6329; LI, ZHI/0000-0002-9268-6497
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41601058]; CAS "Light of
   West China" Program [XAB2015B07, XAB2017A02]; Key Cultivation Project of
   the Chinese Academy of Sciences
FX This work was jointly funded by the National Natural Science Foundation
   of China (Grant No. 41601058), the CAS "Light of West China" Program
   (Grants No. XAB2015B07 and XAB2017A02), and the Key Cultivation Project
   of the Chinese Academy of Sciences entitled 'The promotion and
   management of ecosystem functions of restored vegetation in Loess
   Plateau, China'. In addition, the authors wish to thank anonymous
   reviewers for their constructive suggestions to improve the quality of
   this article.
CR [Anonymous], DOWNSC CMIP3 CMIP5 C
   [Anonymous], 2015, MOD17A3H MODIS TERRA
   Bean WT, 2014, J APPL ECOL, V51, P1116, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12281
   Bentsen M, 2013, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V6, P687, DOI 10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013
   Bolte A, 2009, SCAND J FOREST RES, V24, P473, DOI 10.1080/02827580903418224
   Bonan GB, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P1444, DOI 10.1126/science.1155121
   Botkin DB, 2007, BIOSCIENCE, V57, P227, DOI 10.1641/B570306
   Breed MF, 2013, CONSERV GENET, V14, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10592-012-0425-z
   Bugmann H, 2001, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V51, P259, DOI 10.1023/A:1012525626267
   Cao SX, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V83, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.04.006
   Chen N, 2018, AM NAT, V191, pE1, DOI 10.1086/694821
   Chen YP, 2015, NAT GEOSCI, V8, P739, DOI 10.1038/ngeo2544
   Chiarucci A, 2010, J VEG SCI, V21, P1172, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01218.x
   Crouzeilles R, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms11666
   Dai EF, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P3642, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13307
   de Jong R, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P1953, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12193
   Dunne JP, 2012, J CLIMATE, V25, P6646, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00560.1
   Feng XM, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P1019, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3092, 10.1038/nclimate3092]
   Galatowitsch S, 2009, BIOL CONSERV, V142, P2012, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.03.030
   Harris I, 2014, INT J CLIMATOL, V34, P623, DOI 10.1002/joc.3711
   Hawkins E, 2009, B AM METEOROL SOC, V90, P1095, DOI 10.1175/2009BAMS2607.1
   Hickler T, 2012, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V21, P50, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00613.x
   Hirzel AH, 2008, J APPL ECOL, V45, P1372, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01524.x
   Hua FY, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms12717
   Jian SQ, 2015, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V206, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.03.009
   Koca D, 2006, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V78, P381, DOI 10.1007/s10584-005-9030-1
   Li JJ, 2017, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V247, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.08.005
   Li JJ, 2016, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V75, DOI 10.1007/s12665-016-5807-y
   Liu JY, 2014, J GEOGR SCI, V24, P195, DOI 10.1007/s11442-014-1082-6
   McGuire AD, 2001, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V15, P183, DOI 10.1029/2000GB001298
   Merow C, 2014, ECOGRAPHY, V37, P1267, DOI 10.1111/ecog.00845
   Millar CI, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P2145, DOI 10.1890/06-1715.1
   MONSERUD RA, 1992, ECOL MODEL, V62, P275, DOI 10.1016/0304-3800(92)90003-W
   Neale RB, 2013, J CLIMATE, V26, P5150, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00236.1
   Pappas C, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V118, P505, DOI 10.1002/jgrg.20035
   Pearson RG, 2003, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V12, P361, DOI 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00042.x
   Peng SZ, 2018, INT J CLIMATOL, V38, P2250, DOI 10.1002/joc.5331
   Peng SZ, 2017, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V233, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.11.129
   Peng SZ, 2016, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V21, P153, DOI 10.1007/s11027-014-9581-4
   Rotstayn LD, 2010, INT J CLIMATOL, V30, P1067, DOI 10.1002/joc.1952
   Sato H, 2007, ECOL MODEL, V200, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.09.006
   Scheiter S, 2013, NEW PHYTOL, V198, P957, DOI 10.1111/nph.12210
   Schmidt GA, 2006, J CLIMATE, V19, P153, DOI 10.1175/JCLI3612.1
   Shi HJ, 2016, FORESTS, V7, DOI 10.3390/f7110258
   Sitch S, 2003, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V9, P161, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00569.x
   Smith B, 2014, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V11, P2027, DOI 10.5194/bg-11-2027-2014
   Somodi I, 2017, J VEG SCI, V28, P1260, DOI 10.1111/jvs.12564
   Svenning JC, 2004, ECOL LETT, V7, P565, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00614.x
   Tang KL, 1998, CHINESE SCI BULL, V43, P409, DOI 10.1007/BF02883721
   Tebaldi C, 2007, PHILOS T R SOC A, V365, P2053, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2007.2076
   Txen R., 1956, Angew. Pflanzensozioligie, P5
   Verdone M, 2017, RESTOR ECOL, V25, P903, DOI 10.1111/rec.12512
   Wang H, 2013, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V10, P5817, DOI 10.5194/bg-10-5817-2013
   Wang YQ, 2015, PEDOSPHERE, V25, P546, DOI 10.1016/S1002-0160(15)30035-7
   Weigel AP, 2010, J CLIMATE, V23, P4175, DOI 10.1175/2010JCLI3594.1
   Wolf A, 2008, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V87, P51, DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9342-4
   Yang YZ, 2015, PROG PHYS GEOG, V39, P514, DOI 10.1177/0309133315582018
   Yu KL, 2018, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V29, P2681, DOI 10.1002/ldr.3009
   Yuan ZQ, 2015, SCI REP-UK, V5, DOI 10.1038/srep12130
   Zhao CY, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V191, P487, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.05.018
NR 60
TC 31
Z9 38
U1 8
U2 124
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0168-1923
EI 1873-2240
J9 AGR FOREST METEOROL
JI Agric. For. Meteorol.
PD MAY 15
PY 2019
VL 269
BP 270
EP 284
DI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.02.023
PG 15
WC Agronomy; Forestry; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Forestry; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA HR4MP
UT WOS:000463120900025
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Monteiro, LM
   Okamoto, J
   Peixoto, EV
   Assis, JS
   Suzuki, KM
   Prata-Shimomura, AR
AF Monteiro, Leonardo Marques
   Okamoto Junior, Jun
   Peixoto, Erika Vanoni
   Assis, Julio Sevarolli
   Suzuki, Karina Miyuki
   Prata-Shimomura, Alessandra R.
BE Filho, WL
   Frankenberger, F
   Iglecias, P
   Mulfarth, RCK
TI Assessment of Outdoor Comfort Conditions Based on the Application of a
   Participative Model in Open Urban Spaces
SO TOWARDS GREEN CAMPUS OPERATIONS: ENERGY, CLIMATE AND SUSTAINABLE
   DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES AT UNIVERSITIES
SE World Sustainability Series
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT 1st Symposium on Sustainability in University Campuses (SSUC)
CY SEP 17-19, 2017
CL Sao Paulo, BRAZIL
SP Univ Sao Paulo Brazil, Manchester Metropolitan Univ UK, Hamburg Univ Appl Sci Germany, Res & Transfer Ctr Applicat Life Sci, Inter Univ Sustainable Dev Res Programme
DE Outdoor comfort; Urban space; Participative model; Temperature of
   equivalent perception
AB This paper presents the development of a mobile device application for the implementation of a participative model for evaluation of open spaces. Participants would be users of the Cidade Universitaria Armando Salles Oliveira (CUASO) Campus. The objective is to verify their perception of open spaces with regards to thermal environmental conditions; acoustics; daylight and ergonomic, and enable quick acquisition of these opinions. Thus, the name of the application: Opine. The participative model will provide quantitative subsidies as to the number of users of open spaces and their perception of these spaces and point towards a possible calibration which represents the process of climate adaptation. Studies in the area of environmental comfort and climate in open spaces presuppose the acquisition of data pertaining to environmental conditions, the physical characterization of spaces and users' opinions, gathered by subjective answers. The last years have shown that, despite the technology used in field researches, part of this information could be acquired in a more dynamic manner. The development of the application led us to think of it as merely a questionnaire, as it would be more direct and easy to understand. Furthermore, an application with a questionnaire could be interesting, as campus users can voice their opinion and make their criticisms (or compliments) heard. The mobile application was developed, initially, for the investigation of user comfort in open spaces of the Campus Cidade Universitaria Armando Salles Oliveira, in Sao Paulo, Brazil, but can also be used for the analysis of other open urban spaces. The application was developed for Android systems, with the following characteristics regarded as relevant: easy to understand; clear; organized; easy to read. It should also be visually instinctive to the user, making the data acquisition process more agile and also enabling the rapid and dynamic treatment of the data, providing fast and easy further calculations based on the index of Temperature of Equivalent Perception (TEP) for the assessment of outdoor comfort.
C1 [Monteiro, Leonardo Marques; Peixoto, Erika Vanoni; Assis, Julio Sevarolli; Suzuki, Karina Miyuki; Prata-Shimomura, Alessandra R.] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Architecture & Urbanism, Dept Technol, Lab Environm & Energy Studies, Rua Lago 876, BR-05508080 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
   [Okamoto Junior, Jun] Univ Sao Paulo, Polytech Sch, Dept Mechatron & Mech Syst Engn, Ave Prof Mello Moraes 2231, BR-05508030 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
C3 Universidade de Sao Paulo; Universidade de Sao Paulo
RP Monteiro, LM (corresponding author), Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Architecture & Urbanism, Dept Technol, Lab Environm & Energy Studies, Rua Lago 876, BR-05508080 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
EM leo4mm@usp.br; jokamoto@usp.br; erikalu2@hotmail.com;
   juliosevarollia@gmail.com; karina.miyuki.suzuki@usp.br;
   arprata.shimo@gmail.com
RI Shimomura, Alessandra/AAC-6250-2021; Okamoto, Jun/D-7113-2013; Monteiro,
   Leonardo Marques/K-6780-2015
OI Okamoto Jr., Jun/0000-0001-8869-3662; Monteiro, Leonardo
   Marques/0000-0002-1163-8136
FU FAPESP-The State of Sao Paulo Research Foundation
FX To FAPESP-The State of Sao Paulo Research Foundation-for the financial
   support.
CR Alucci M. P., 2009, PASSIVE LOW ENERGY A, V26
   Alucci M. P, 2005, PASSIVE LOW ENERGY A, V22
   [Anonymous], 2014, WORLD URB PROSP 2014
   [Anonymous], 2008, THESIS
   Anuario Estatistico-USP, 2015, AN EST USP
   Bustamante M. M. C., 2014, CONTRIBUICAO GRUPO T
   Deitel P. J, 2005, JAVA COMO PROGRAMAR
   Lecheta R. R, 2015, GOOGLE ANDROID 4 EDI
   Mills G, 2006, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V84, P69, DOI 10.1007/s00704-005-0145-0
   Monteiro LM, 2011, P 27 INT C PASS LOW, P433
   Oke T. R., 1987, Boundary layer climates, V2nd
NR 11
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 4
PU SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
PI CHAM
PA GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND
SN 2199-7373
EI 2199-7381
BN 978-3-319-76885-4; 978-3-319-76884-7
J9 WORLD SUSTAIN SER
PY 2018
BP 185
EP 196
DI 10.1007/978-3-319-76885-4_12
PG 12
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Studies;
   Regional & Urban Planning
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Science &amp; Humanities (CPCI-SSH)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology;
   Public Administration
GA BK9GI
UT WOS:000444548900012
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Smith, AB
   Alsdurf, J
   Knapp, M
   Baer, SG
   Johnson, LC
AF Smith, Adam B.
   Alsdurf, Jacob
   Knapp, Mary
   Baer, Sara G.
   Johnson, Loretta C.
TI Phenotypic distribution models corroborate species distribution models:
   A shift in the role and prevalence of a dominant prairie grass in
   response to climate change
SO GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE biomass; climate change; intraspecific variation; local adaptation;
   phenotype distribution model; phenotypic variation; precipitation;
   species distribution model
ID ANDROPOGON-GERARDII POACEAE; LOCAL ADAPTATION; BIG BLUESTEM;
   GREAT-PLAINS; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; ECOTYPES; GROWTH; RESTORATION;
   CULTIVARS; COMMUNITY
AB Phenotypic distribution within species can vary widely across environmental gradients but forecasts of species' responses to environmental change often assume species respond homogenously across their ranges. We compared predictions from species and phenotype distribution models under future climate scenarios for Andropogon gerardii, a widely distributed, dominant grass found throughout the central United States. Phenotype data on aboveground biomass, height, leaf width, and chlorophyll content were obtained from 33 populations spanning a similar to 1000 km gradient that encompassed the majority of the species' environmental range. Species and phenotype distribution models were trained using current climate conditions and projected to future climate scenarios. We used permutation procedures to infer the most important variable for each model. The species-level response to climate was most sensitive to maximum temperature of the hottest month, but phenotypic variables were most sensitive to mean annual precipitation. The phenotype distribution models predict that A. gerardii could be largely functionally eliminated from where this species currently dominates, with biomass and height declining by up to similar to 60% and leaf width by similar to 20%. By the 2070s, the core area of highest suitability for A. gerardii is projected to shift up to similar to 700 km northeastward. Further, short-statured phenotypes found in the present-day short grass prairies on the western periphery of the species' range will become favored in the current core similar to 800 km eastward of their current location. Combined, species and phenotype models predict this currently dominant prairie grass will decline in prevalence and stature. Thus, sourcing plant material for grassland restoration and forage should consider changes in the phenotype that will be favored under future climate conditions. Phenotype distribution models account for the role of intraspecific variation in determining responses to anticipated climate change and thereby complement predictions from species distributions models in guiding climate adaptation strategies.
C1 [Smith, Adam B.] Missouri Bot Garden, Ctr Conservat & Sustainable Dev, St Louis, MO 63110 USA.
   [Alsdurf, Jacob; Johnson, Loretta C.] Kansas State Univ, Div Biol, Ackert Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA.
   [Knapp, Mary] Kansas State Univ, Weather Data Lib, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA.
   [Baer, Sara G.] Southern Illinois Univ Carbondale, Dept Plant Biol, Carbondale, IL USA.
   [Baer, Sara G.] Southern Illinois Univ Carbondale, Ctr Ecol, Carbondale, IL USA.
C3 Missouri Botanical Gardens; Kansas State University; Kansas State
   University; Southern Illinois University System; Southern Illinois
   University; Southern Illinois University System; Southern Illinois
   University
RP Smith, AB (corresponding author), Missouri Bot Garden, Ctr Conservat & Sustainable Dev, St Louis, MO 63110 USA.
EM adam.smith@mobot.org
RI Smith, Adam/L-5111-2013
OI Smith, Adam/0000-0002-6420-1659
FU U.S. Department of Agriculture [2008-3510004545]; Kansas Academy of
   Science; Alan Graham Fund in Global Change; Direct For Biological
   Sciences; Division Of Environmental Biology [1440484] Funding Source:
   National Science Foundation
FX U.S. Department of Agriculture, Grant/ Award Number: 2008-3510004545;
   Kansas Academy of Science; Alan Graham Fund in Global Change.
CR Aitken SN, 2013, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V44, P367, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135747
   [Anonymous], 1944, AM SOC AGRONOMY
   Baer SG, 2016, ECOL MONOGR, V86, P94, DOI 10.1890/15-0888.1
   Behrman KD, 2014, BIOENERG RES, V7, P1165, DOI 10.1007/s12155-014-9450-8
   Benito-Garzón M, 2013, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V22, P1141, DOI 10.1111/geb.12075
   Bombi P, 2012, J BIOGEOGR, V39, P640, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02627.x
   Breiman L., 2001, Machine Learning, V45, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Broadhurst LM, 2008, EVOL APPL, V1, P587, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00045.x
   Caudle KL, 2014, PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V52, P511, DOI 10.1007/s11099-014-0057-2
   Chuine I, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P3149, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0142
   Clausen J., 1940, Carnegie Inst Washington Publ 520
   Collins SL, 2012, FUNCT ECOL, V26, P1450, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.01995.x
   Collins SL, 2012, J VEG SCI, V23, P563, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01369.x
   Elith J, 2008, J ANIM ECOL, V77, P802, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x
   Epstein HE, 1998, PLANT ECOL, V134, P173, DOI 10.1023/A:1009732800810
   Epstein HE, 1996, J VEG SCI, V7, P777, DOI 10.2307/3236456
   Etterson JR, 2004, EVOLUTION, V58, P1446, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01726.x
   Fay PA, 2011, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V8, P3053, DOI 10.5194/bg-8-3053-2011
   Gray MM, 2014, MOL ECOL, V23, P6011, DOI 10.1111/mec.12993
   Hällfors MH, 2016, ECOL APPL, V26, P1154, DOI 10.1890/15-0926
   HERRERO MP, 1980, CROP SCI, V20, P796, DOI 10.2135/cropsci1980.0011183X002000060030x
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   Hothorn T, 2011, ECOL MONOGR, V81, P329, DOI 10.1890/10-0602.1
   Hufford KM, 2003, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V18, P147, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00002-8
   Johnson LC, 2015, EVOL APPL, V8, P705, DOI 10.1111/eva.12281
   Joshi J, 2001, ECOL LETT, V4, P536, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00262.x
   Jump AS, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P1010, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00796.x
   Kakani VG, 2007, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V61, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.06.002
   Keeler KH, 2002, AM MIDL NAT, V147, P295, DOI 10.1674/0003-0031(2002)147[0295:CSOAGV]2.0.CO;2
   Lant C, 2016, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V138, P585, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1738-6
   Linhart YB, 1996, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V27, P237, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.237
   Madakadze IC, 2003, CROP SCI, V43, P874, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2003.0874
   Mainali KP, 2014, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V171, P977, DOI 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.04.006
   Malyshev AV, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P449, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13114
   MCMILLAN C, 1959, AM J BOT, V46, P418, DOI 10.2307/2439137
   Mendola ML, 2015, ECOLOGY, V96, P2433, DOI 10.1890/14-1492.1
   Michel MJ, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V140, P563, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1856-1
   Nippert JB, 2012, PLANT SOIL, V355, P385, DOI 10.1007/s11104-011-1112-4
   Olsen JT, 2013, AM J BOT, V100, P1957, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1200628
   Phillips SJ, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V190, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
   Polley HW, 2013, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V66, P493, DOI 10.2111/REM-D-12-00068.1
   Rouse MN, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0017641
   Shaw RG, 2012, NEW PHYTOL, V195, P752, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04230.x
   Silletti A, 2002, PLANT ECOL, V163, P15, DOI 10.1023/A:1020320214750
   Soil Conservation Service, 2012, ANN SUMMARY ENROLLME
   VANTIENDEREN PH, 1991, EVOLUTION, V45, P1317, DOI [10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb02638.x, 10.2307/2409882]
   Weaver JE, 1936, ECOLOGY, V17, P567, DOI 10.2307/1932761
   Weaver JE, 1932, BOT GAZ, V93, P0113, DOI 10.1086/334244
   Wittmann ME, 2016, ECOL EVOL, V6, P873, DOI 10.1002/ece3.1898
   Zhang K, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V52, P740, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.144
NR 50
TC 32
Z9 44
U1 2
U2 63
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1354-1013
EI 1365-2486
J9 GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL
JI Glob. Change Biol.
PD OCT
PY 2017
VL 23
IS 10
BP 4365
EP 4375
DI 10.1111/gcb.13666
PG 11
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA FG7YS
UT WOS:000410642100033
PM 28211151
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Gutiérrez, O
   Panario, D
   Nagy, GJ
   Bidegain, M
   Montes, C
AF Gutierrez, Ofelia
   Panario, Daniel
   Nagy, Gustavo J.
   Bidegain, Mario
   Montes, Carlos
TI Climate teleconnections and indicators of coastal systems response
SO OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Sandy beach; Creek mouths; Erosion-accretion; El Nino - La Nina events;
   Rio de la Plata estuary
ID DE-LA-PLATA; PARANA RIVER; VARIABILITY; SCENARIOS; EVOLUTION; PATTERNS;
   ESTUARY; IMPACT; RISE
AB This article surveys secular urban sandy beaches erosion accretion and its relationship with climate teleconnections, e.g El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO), Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), and extreme events, e.g., storm surges, great rivers' floods, and heavy rains in adjacent basins. The paper aims to discuss these issues and the expected coastal retreat as a consequence of manmade climate changes, e.g., sea level rise (SLR) and increased storminess in the coming decades. Several beaches (Buceo, Malvin, Pocitos, Ramirez) and two tidal creek sandy mouths (Carrasco and Pando), with different characteristics but all constrained by coastal linear infrastructure were studied. These sites are located along the urbanised coast of the middle region of Rio de la Plata microtidal river estuary. All of them show a more or less strong retreat trend with alternated fluctuations, e.g., weak retreat likely due to sea level rise, significant erosion very likely due to storm surges, and processes of loss of sediment stock, as well as episodes of sand recovery. Therefore, these beaches require interventions to preserve their beach prism and dry sand surface. In search for answers to better understand why and under what conditions the process of advance and retreat of the coastline occur, we have analysed different teleconnections and carried out reanalyses for wind anomalies during ENSO events from 1951 to 2010. Both weak and moderate erosion accretion periods are likely related to atmospheric anomalies, e.g., wind direction changes and the consequent swell and littoral drift changes, related' to El Nino and La Nina events. The former associated with accretion and the latter with erosion. In the past most interventions have been reactive. Increased knowledge of climate and weather relationship with the sedimentary balance provides an approach that would allow developing beach risk-management, pro-active strategies and climate adaption measures focused on the generation and recovery planning based on the analysis of the occurrence and prediction of El Nino/La Nina events. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Gutierrez, Ofelia; Panario, Daniel] Univ Republica, Fac Ciencias, IECA, UNCIEP, Igua 4225, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay.
   [Nagy, Gustavo J.] Univ Republica, Fac Ciencias, IECA, Grp Cambio Ambiental & Gest Costero Marina, Igua 4225, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay.
   [Bidegain, Mario] Inst Uruguayo Meteorol InUMet, Barrios Amorin 1488, Montevideo 11200, Uruguay.
   [Montes, Carlos] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Ciencias, Dept Ecol, Ciudad Univ Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain.
C3 Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay; Universidad de la Republica,
   Uruguay; Autonomous University of Madrid
RP Gutiérrez, O (corresponding author), Univ Republica, Fac Ciencias, IECA, UNCIEP, Igua 4225, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay.
EM oguti@fcien.edu.uy; panari@fcien.edu.uy; gnagy@fcien.edu.uy;
   bidegain.mario@gmail.com; carlos.montes@uam.es
RI Panario, Daniel/D-3998-2016; Gutierrez, Ofelia/C-5763-2016; nagy,
   gustavo/G-8097-2017
OI Panario, Daniel/0000-0001-7018-8289; Gutierrez,
   Ofelia/0000-0002-1210-9658; nagy, gustavo/0000-0002-8296-4465
FU U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science Innovative and Novel
   Computational Impact on Theory and Experiment (DOE INCITE) program;
   Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER); National Oceanic
   and Atmospheric Administration Climate Program Office
FX We thank the dataset provided by the NOAA-ESRL Physical Sciences
   Division, Boulder Colorado from their Web site at
   http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/. Support for the Twentieth Century
   Reanalysis Project dataset is provided by the U.S. Department of Energy,
   Office of Science Innovative and Novel Computational Impact on Theory
   and Experiment (DOE INCITE) program, and Office of Biological and
   Environmental Research (BER), and by the National Oceanic and
   Atmospheric Administration Climate Program Office.
CR [Anonymous], 2010, THESIS
   [Anonymous], 1997, RIO PLATA ENV OVERVI
   [Anonymous], COSTAS REV IBEROAM M
   [Anonymous], 2015, CLIMATE CHANGE COAST
   [Anonymous], 2005, CAMBIO CLIMATICO RIO
   [Anonymous], 2015, J INTEGR COAST ZONE
   [Anonymous], 2007, CONTRIBUTION WORKING
   [Anonymous], ESTUARIES S AM THEIR
   Armaroli C, 2006, J COASTAL RES, P473
   Barros V, 2005, APA-PSIEP (Am. Psychol. Assoc. - Proj. Sci. Inf. Exch. Psychol.) Rep
   Bidegain M., 2015, B AM METEOROL SOC, V96, pS182
   BIDEGAIN M, 2005, CAMBIO CLIMATICO RIO, P137
   Blunden J, 2014, B AM METEOROL SOC, V95, pS1, DOI 10.1175/2014BAMSStateoftheClimate.1
   Boak EH, 2005, J COASTAL RES, V21, P688, DOI 10.2112/03-0071.1
   Bracco R, 2011, QUATERN INT, V245, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.05.025
   Camilloni I, 2000, J HYDROMETEOROL, V1, P412, DOI 10.1175/1525-7541(2000)001<0412:TPRRTE>2.0.CO;2
   Camilloni IA, 2003, J HYDROL, V278, P94, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00133-1
   Ciavola P., 2003, P 6 INT C MEDITERRAN, VVolume 3, P2363
   Codignotto JO, 2012, CONT SHELF RES, V38, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.csr.2012.03.013
   del Puerto L, 2013, QUATERN INT, V287, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2011.11.026
   Dias JA, 2013, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V77, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.07.025
   Dragani WC, 2010, CONT SHELF RES, V30, P481, DOI 10.1016/j.csr.2010.01.002
   EcoPlata, 1999, ECOPLATA REC INF TEC
   Escobar G, 2004, INT J CLIMATOL, V24, P1159, DOI 10.1002/joc.1026
   Fisher S., 2015, NEW DIR EVAL, P13
   Flood S, 2014, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V102, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.08.015
   GUTIERREZ O, 2006, BASES CONSERVACION M, P391, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0341-8162(00)00142-9
   GuTIERREz o., 2016, THESIS
   Gutierrez O., 2005, XEOGRAFICA, V5, P107
   Gutiérrez Ofelia, 2015, RGCI, V15, P467, DOI 10.5894/rgci553
   Holling CS, 2001, PANARCHY, P25
   Iriondo M., 2011, SAND DUNES CONSERVAT, P1
   Iriondo M, 2009, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V283, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.09.005
   IRIONDO MH, 1993, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V101, P209, DOI 10.1016/0031-0182(93)90013-9
   Kalnay E, 1996, B AM METEOROL SOC, V77, P437, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO;2
   Ledoux L, 2002, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V45, P583, DOI 10.1016/S0964-5691(02)00088-1
   Luisetti T, 2014, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V493, P682, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.099
   Marshall F.E., 2013, Integrated Conceptual Ecosystem Model Development for the Southeast Florida Coastal Marine Ecosystem, P94
   Masselink G., 2014, Coastal Environments and Global Change
   Menendez A., 2006, CAMBIO CLIM TICO CUE, P81
   MTOP/PNUD/UNESCO, 1979, 73007 MTOPPNUDUNESCO
   Nagy G., 2007, Medio Ambiente y Urbanizacion, V67, P77
   Nagy GJ, 2008, ADV SPACE RES, V41, P1876, DOI 10.1016/j.asr.2007.11.027
   Nagy G.J., 2008, CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPT, P353
   Nagy G. J., 2015, IECA TECHNICAL REPOR
   Nagy G.J., 2003, RIO PLATA RES MANAGE, P21
   Nagy G.J., 2005, CAMBIO CLIMATICO RIO, P173
   Nagy GJ, 2002, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V475, P125, DOI 10.1023/A:1020300906000
   Nagy Gustavo J., 2014, RGCI, V14, P553, DOI 10.5894/rgci472
   Nagy GJ, 2014, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V6, P63, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2013-0035
   Nicholls RJ, 2010, SCIENCE, V328, P1517, DOI 10.1126/science.1185782
   Ortega L, 2013, J COASTAL RES, V29, P747, DOI 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-13-00003.1
   Panario D, 2005, ECOSISTEMAS, V14, P150
   Panario D, 1997, CLIM RES, V9, P67, DOI 10.3354/cr009067
   Panario D., 2008, PROPUESTA TECNICA CO
   Piovano EL, 2009, DEV PALEOENVIRON RES, V14, P323, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-2672-9_14
   PISCIOTTANO G, 1994, J CLIMATE, V7, P1286, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1994)007<1286:ENSOIO>2.0.CO;2
   ROPELEWSKI CF, 1987, MON WEATHER REV, V115, P1606, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<1606:GARSPP>2.0.CO;2
   Severov DN, 2004, ADV SPACE RES-SERIES, V33, P343, DOI 10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00479-4
   Simionato CG, 2007, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V112, DOI 10.1029/2006JC003815
   Simionato CG, 2005, J COASTAL RES, V21, P770, DOI 10.2112/008-NIS.1
   Stevens S., 2005, NPSNERNRTR2005025 US
   Verocai José E., 2015, RGCI, V15, P91, DOI 10.5894/rgci555
   Young IR, 2011, SCIENCE, V332, P451, DOI 10.1126/science.1197219
NR 64
TC 19
Z9 23
U1 1
U2 30
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0964-5691
EI 1873-524X
J9 OCEAN COAST MANAGE
JI Ocean Coastal Manage.
PD MAR
PY 2016
VL 122
BP 64
EP 76
DI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.01.009
PG 13
WC Oceanography; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Oceanography; Water Resources
GA DF7RU
UT WOS:000371556100008
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Huibregtse, E
   Napoles, OM
   Hellebrandt, L
   Paprotny, D
   de Wit, S
AF Huibregtse, Elja
   Napoles, Oswaldo Morales
   Hellebrandt, Laura
   Paprotny, Dominik
   de Wit, Sten
TI Climate change in asset management of infrastructure: A risk-based
   methodology applied to disruption of traffic on road networks due to the
   flooding of tunnels
SO EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; infrastructure; asset management; risk-based design;
   probabilistic modelling; structured expert judgement
ID EXPERT JUDGMENT ASSESSMENT; INTERCONNECTED INFRASTRUCTURES; ADAPTIVE
   MANAGEMENT; EURO-CORDEX; ADAPTATION; IMPACT; UNCERTAINTY; FRAMEWORK
AB This paper presents a risk-based method to quantify climate change effects on road infrastructure, as a support for decision-making on interventions. This can be implemented in climate adaptation plans as an element of asset management. The method is illustrated by a specific case in which traffic on a road network is disrupted by the flooding of a tunnel due to extreme rainfall.
   Novel techniques to describe both probability of occurrence and consequences of an event are integrated into the proposed risk-based approach. To model a typical climate-change related phenomenon, i.e. rainfall intensity-duration, a model using copulas is proposed as well as a method to account for uncertainty using structured expert judgement. To quantify the consequences, an existing quick scan tool is adopted. The method calculates the risk of flooding of a tunnel, expressed in both probability of occurrence and subsequent additional travel duration on the road network. By comparison of this evolving risk to a societally acceptable threshold, the remaining resilience of the tunnel is evaluated. Furthermore, the method assesses the development of the resilience over time as a result of projected climate change. The maximum time-to-intervention is defined as the period up until the moment when the resilience is depleted. By application of the method to a tunnel in two different contexts, i.e. in a regional road network and a highway network, it is shown that the consequences of tunnel flooding may differ by an order of magnitude (25-fold for the example). Using a risk-based decision-making perspective leads to significant differences in the maximum time-to-intervention. In the example case the year of intervention is determined at 2020 for a tunnel in a highway network, while interventions can be postponed until 2140 in a regional road network.
C1 [Huibregtse, Elja; Hellebrandt, Laura; de Wit, Sten] TNO, Delft, Netherlands.
   [Napoles, Oswaldo Morales; Paprotny, Dominik] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Delft, Netherlands.
C3 Netherlands Organization Applied Science Research; Delft University of
   Technology
RP Huibregtse, E (corresponding author), Van Mourik Broekmanweg 6, NL-2628 XE Delft, Netherlands.
EM elja.huibregtse@tno.nl; o.moralesnapoles@tudelft.nl;
   laura.hellebrandt@tno.nl; d.paprotny@tudelft.nl; sten.dewit@tno.nl
RI Morales-Nápoles, Oswaldo/N-3224-2019; Morales Napoles,
   Oswaldo/B-6941-2015
OI Paprotny, Dominik/0000-0001-5090-8402; Morales Napoles,
   Oswaldo/0000-0002-6764-4674
CR [Anonymous], 2006, HIGHL EXP JUDGM POL
   [Anonymous], 1997, Multivariate models and multivariate dependence concepts
   Arvai J, 2006, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V78, P217, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9094-6
   Bamber JL, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P424, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1778, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1778]
   Bollinger LA, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P919, DOI 10.1007/s10113-013-0428-4
   Changnon SA, 1999, J APPL METEOROL, V38, P273, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<0273:RFPROJ>2.0.CO;2
   Chappin EJL, 2014, UTIL POLICY, V31, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2014.07.003
   Chatterton J., 2010, COSTS SUMMER 2007 FL
   Chinowsky PS, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P764, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.004
   Collins M, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1029
   Cooke RM, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P311, DOI 10.1038/nclimate1860
   Cooke RM, 2008, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V93, P657, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.005
   Dankers R, 2009, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V114, DOI 10.1029/2008JD011523
   Genest C, 2009, INSUR MATH ECON, V44, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.10.005
   Huibregtse J. N., 2013, P 11 INT C STRUCT SA, P1463
   Hunter J, 2010, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V99, P331, DOI 10.1007/s10584-009-9671-6
   Jacob D, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P563, DOI 10.1007/s10113-013-0499-2
   Joe H., 2014, Dependence modeling with copulas (1st ed.)
   KNMI, 2014, KNMI STRAT
   Knutti R, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P369, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1716, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1716]
   Koetse MJ, 2009, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V14, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2008.12.004
   Kotlarski S, 2014, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V7, P1297, DOI 10.5194/gmd-7-1297-2014
   McLain RJ, 1996, ENVIRON MANAGE, V20, P437, DOI 10.1007/BF01474647
   Nemry F., 2012, IMPACTS CLIMATE CHAN, DOI [10.2791/15504, DOI 10.2791/15504]
   Neumann JE, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V131, P97, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-1037-4
   Overeem A, 2008, J HYDROL, V348, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.044
   Pfeffer WT, 2008, SCIENCE, V321, P1340, DOI 10.1126/science.1159099
   Piyatrapoomi N, 2004, RES TRANS E, V8, P199, DOI 10.1016/S0739-8859(04)08010-2
   Ryghaug M, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V114, P427, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0449-x
   Schaller N, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V116, DOI 10.1029/2010JD014963
   Schweikert A, 2014, TRANSPORT POLICY, V35, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.05.019
   Snelder M., 2011, TNO060DTM201104228
   Stapelberg R.F., 2009, HDB RELIABILITY AVAI
   Thompson A, 2006, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V78, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9095-5
   Verstraeten-Jochemsen J., 2013, TNO060DTM201300639
   Vrouwenvelder A.C.W.M., 2000, CIB PUBLICATION, V259
NR 36
TC 8
Z9 9
U1 0
U2 40
PU EDITORIAL BOARD EJTIR
PI JAFFALAAN 5
PA SECTION TRANSPORT POLICY-TLO, JAFFALAAN 5, JAFFALAAN 5, 2628 BX,
   NETHERLANDS
SN 1567-7133
EI 1567-7141
J9 EUR J TRANSP INFRAST
JI Eur. J. Transport. Infrastruct. Res.
PD JAN 4
PY 2016
VL 16
IS 1
BP 98
EP 113
PG 16
WC Transportation
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Transportation
GA CZ1YL
UT WOS:000366901900008
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU McInnes, KL
   Hoeke, RK
   Walsh, KJE
   O'Grady, JG
   Hubbert, GD
AF McInnes, Kathleen L.
   Hoeke, Ron K.
   Walsh, Kevin J. E.
   O'Grady, Julian G.
   Hubbert, Graeme D.
TI Application of a synthetic cyclone method for assessment of tropical
   cyclone storm tides in Samoa
SO NATURAL HAZARDS
LA English
DT Article
DE Storm surge; Storm tide; Return periods; Tropical cyclones; Climate
   variability; Climate change; Coastal impacts; Climate adaptation; Risk
   reduction
ID SEA-LEVEL RISE; SOUTH-PACIFIC; CLIMATE VARIABILITY; WIND; INUNDATION;
   ISLANDS; MODEL; FIJI
AB Tropical cyclone-induced storm surges cause damaging impacts in coastal regions. The present study uses a stochastic cyclone modelling approach to evaluate the likelihoods of storm tides, the combination of storm surges and astronomical tides, for Samoa. Cyclones that occurred in the vicinity of Samoa from 1969 to 2009 are used to build a stochastic tropical cyclone data set, and an analytic cyclone model and hydrodynamic model are used to model storm tides under average, La Nia and El Nio cyclone and sea level conditions for present climate conditions as well as cyclone and sea level conditions relevant for 2055, and storm tide return periods are estimated. We find that extreme storm tides exhibit relatively modest variation around the coastline of Samoa owing to the uniform width of the shelf surrounding the coastlines of two main islands of Savai'i and Upolu. The frequency of cyclones and hence storm tides during El Nio conditions is similar to the frequency for all seasons, but is considerably lower in La Nia conditions. For the future, tropical cyclones are assumed to undergo decreased frequency and increased intensity. This is found to lower the storm tide height for return periods < 100 years and increase it for return periods greater than about 200 years. Sea level rise is shown to have a larger influence on storm tides than future changes to tropical cyclones. Considering the aggregated probabilities of storm tides occurring at the national scale, we find that the likelihood of a storm tide occurring that locally exceeds a 1-in-100-year level (i.e. an event with a 1 % annual exceedance probability) has a 6 % probability of occurring somewhere along the entire coastline of Samoa. Such information may be useful for those involved in coastal management and disaster response for which there may be a need to consider the overall likelihood that a nation may have to respond to such a disaster.
C1 [McInnes, Kathleen L.; Hoeke, Ron K.; O'Grady, Julian G.] CSIRO Marine & Atmospher Res, CAWCR Ctr Australian Weather & Climate Res, Aspendale, Vic 3195, Australia.
   [Walsh, Kevin J. E.] Univ Melbourne, Sch Earth Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia.
   [Hubbert, Graeme D.] Global Environm Modelling Syst, Warrandyte, Vic 3113, Australia.
C3 Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO);
   University of Melbourne
RP McInnes, KL (corresponding author), CSIRO Marine & Atmospher Res, CAWCR Ctr Australian Weather & Climate Res, Aspendale, Vic 3195, Australia.
EM kathleen.mcinnes@csiro.au; ron.hoeke@csiro.au;
   kevin.walsh@unimelb.edu.au; julian.ogrady@csiro.au;
   graeme.hubbert@gems-aus.com
RI O'Grady, Julian/T-2742-2019; Hoeke, Ron/F-4085-2014; McInnes,
   Kathleen/A-7787-2012; O'Grady, Julian/H-9603-2016
OI Hoeke, Ron/0000-0003-0576-9436; McInnes, Kathleen/0000-0002-1810-7215;
   O'Grady, Julian/0000-0003-3552-9193; Walsh, Kevin/0000-0002-1860-510X
FU Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
FX This research was undertaken as part of the Pacific-Australia Climate
   Change Science and Adaptation Planning Program funded by the Australian
   Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and administered by the
   Australian Department of the Environment.
CR [Anonymous], CLIM DYN
   Australian Bureau of Meteorology and CSIRO, 2011, CLIM CHANG PAC SCI A, V1, P530
   Becker M, 2012, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V80-81, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.09.004
   Carter R, 1987, 78 SOPAC, P30
   Chand SS, 2009, J CLIMATE, V22, P3877, DOI 10.1175/2009JCLI2880.1
   Church J.A., 2013, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
   Coles S., 2001, An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-3675-0
   Courtney J, 2009, AUST METEOROL OCEAN, V58, P167, DOI 10.22499/2.5803.002
   Emanuel K, 2000, MON WEATHER REV, V128, P1139, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<1139:ASAOTC>2.0.CO;2
   EMANUEL KA, 1987, NATURE, V326, P483, DOI 10.1038/326483a0
   Gill J. P., 1994, Australian Meteorological Magazine, V43, P181
   Hardy TA, 2004, REPORT PREPARED J CO
   Hoeke RK, 2014, 071 CAWCR, P67
   Hoeke R, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V116, DOI 10.1029/2010JC006170
   Hoeke RK, 2013, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V108, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.06.006
   Hoeke RK, 2015, J MAR SCI ENG, V3, P1117, DOI 10.3390/jmse3031117
   HOLLAND GJ, 1980, MON WEATHER REV, V108, P1212, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<1212:AAMOTW>2.0.CO;2
   Holland G, 2008, MON WEATHER REV, V136, P3432, DOI 10.1175/2008MWR2395.1
   Hubbert GD, 1999, J COASTAL RES, V15, P168
   HUBBERT GD, 1991, WEATHER FORECAST, V6, P86, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(1991)006<0086:ARTSFF>2.0.CO;2
   Kimball SK, 2004, J CLIMATE, V17, P3555, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<3555:AYCONA>2.0.CO;2
   Knutson TR, 2010, NAT GEOSCI, V3, P157, DOI 10.1038/NGEO779
   Kossin JP, 2007, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V34, DOI 10.1029/2006GL028836
   LEPROVOST C, 1995, SCIENCE, V267, P639, DOI 10.1126/science.267.5198.639
   McInnes KL, 2011, J COASTAL RES, P1121
   McInnes KL, 2014, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V116, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2014.02.004
   Mcinnes KL, 2003, NAT HAZARDS, V30, P187, DOI 10.1023/A:1026118417752
   Merrifield MA, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V118, P2535, DOI 10.1002/jgrc.20173
   Ready S., 1992, Australian Meteorological Magazine, V40, P111
   Rearic DM, 1990, 104 SOPAC, P36
   Saha S, 2010, B AM METEOROL SOC, V91, P1015, DOI 10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1
   Solomon SM, 1994, 208 SOPAC, P62
   Timmermann A, 2010, J CLIMATE, V23, P4429, DOI 10.1175/2010JCLI3519.1
   UNDP, 2015, SAM BUILD BACK BETT
   Vetter O, 2010, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V115, DOI 10.1029/2010JC006455
   Vickery PJ, 2000, J STRUCT ENG-ASCE, V126, P1222, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1222)
   Walsh KJE, 2012, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V80-81, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.10.006
   Yin JJ, 2010, J CLIMATE, V23, P4585, DOI 10.1175/2010JCLI3533.1
   Zhang XB, 2012, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V39, DOI 10.1029/2012GL053240
NR 39
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 1
U2 29
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 0921-030X
EI 1573-0840
J9 NAT HAZARDS
JI Nat. Hazards
PD JAN
PY 2016
VL 80
IS 1
BP 425
EP 444
DI 10.1007/s11069-015-1975-4
PG 20
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA CZ7EO
UT WOS:000367262900022
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Hargreaves, AJ
AF Hargreaves, A. J.
TI Representing the dwelling stock as 3D generic tiles estimated from
   average residential density
SO COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban modelling; Housing survey; Gamma distribution; Dwelling typology;
   Building-scale technologies
ID BUILDING-STOCK; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; LAND-USE; MICROSIMULATION;
   EFFICIENCY; TRANSPORT; SUPPORT; DESIGN; MODEL; LIDAR
AB Forecasting the variability of dwellings and residential land is important for estimating the future potential of environmental technologies. This paper presents an innovative method of converting average residential density into a set of one-hectare 3D tiles to represent the dwelling stock. These generic tiles include residential land as well as the dwelling characteristics. The method was based on a detailed analysis of the English House Condition Survey data and density was calculated as the inverse of the plot area per dwelling. This found that when disaggregated by age band, urban morphology and area type, the frequency distribution of plot density per dwelling type can be represented by the gamma distribution. The shape parameter revealed interesting characteristics about the dwelling stock and how this has changed overtime. It showed a consistent trend that older dwellings have greater variability in plot density than newer dwellings, and also that apartments and detached dwellings have greater variability in plot density than terraced and semi-detached dwellings, Once calibrated, the shape parameter of the gamma distribution was used to convert the average density per housing type into a frequency distribution of plot density. These were then approximated by systematically selecting a set of generic tiles. These tiles are particularly useful as a medium for multidisciplinary research on decentralized environmental technologies or climate adaptation, which requires this understanding of the variability of dwellings, occupancies and urban space. It thereby links the socioeconomic modeling of city regions with the physical modeling of dwellings and associated infrastructure across the spatial scales. The tiles method has been validated by comparing results against English regional housing survey data and dwelling footprint area data. The next step would be to explore the possibility of generating generic residential area types and adapt the method to other countries that have similar housing survey data. (C) 2015 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
C1 [Hargreaves, A. J.] Univ Birmingham, Sch Civil Engn, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England.
C3 University of Birmingham
RP Hargreaves, AJ (corresponding author), Univ Birmingham, Sch Civil Engn, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England.
EM a.j.hargreaves@bham.ac.uk
OI Hargreaves, Anthony/0000-0002-4887-4407
FU UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
   [EP/F007566/1]; EPSRC [EP/F007566/1] Funding Source: UKRI
FX The author is grateful for the assistance of Dr Vicky Cheng, Technical
   University of Munich who designed the dwelling dimensions of each tile
   type to match its plot density. The research was carried out as part of
   the ReVISIONS (Regional Visions of Integrated Sustainable Infrastructure
   Optimized for NeighborhoodS) research project funded by the UK
   Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) as part of
   the Sustainable Urban Environments program, grant reference number
   EP/F007566/1. The English House Condition Survey data was provided by
   the UK Department of Communities and Local Government. Mastermap (TM)
   was provided for academic use by Ordnance Survey.
CR Abraham JE, 2005, TRANSPORT RES REC, P114
   [Anonymous], 2020, Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences
   [Anonymous], 2009, ENGL HOUS COND SURV
   Ballarini I, 2014, ENERG POLICY, V68, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.027
   Cheng V, 2011, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V26, P1186, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.04.005
   Crompton A, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN B, V39, P174, DOI 10.1068/b37063
   CRUTCHER HL, 1975, J APPL METEOROL, V14, P1600, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1975)014<1600:ANOTPM>2.0.CO;2
   DCLG, 2007, ENGL HOUS COND SUR 1
   DCLG, 2005, GEN LAND US DAT STAT
   *DECC, 2012, REN HEAT INC CONS PR
   Echenique MH, 2013, ENVIRON PLANN B, V40, P1003, DOI 10.1068/b38202
   Filogamo L, 2014, APPL ENERG, V135, P825, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.002
   Firth SK, 2010, BUILD RES INF, V38, P25, DOI 10.1080/09613210903236706
   Girardin L, 2010, ENERGY, V35, P830, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2009.08.018
   Hofierka J, 2009, RENEW ENERG, V34, P2206, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2009.02.021
   Husak GJ, 2007, INT J CLIMATOL, V27, P935, DOI 10.1002/joc.1441
   Ison N. T., 1971, Journal of Applied Meteorology, V10, P658, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1971)010<0658:WPPATG>2.0.CO;2
   Jakubiec JA, 2013, SOL ENERGY, V93, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2013.03.022
   Kavgic M, 2010, BUILD ENVIRON, V45, P1683, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.021
   Kohler N, 2002, BUILD RES INF, V30, P226, DOI 10.1080/09613210110102238
   Lukac N, 2013, APPL ENERG, V102, P803, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.08.042
   Makropoulos CK, 2008, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V23, P1448, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.04.010
   Mata E, 2014, BUILD ENVIRON, V81, P270, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.06.013
   McCullagh P., 1989, Generalized Linear Models, VSecond
   McKenna R, 2013, BUILD ENVIRON, V62, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.01.002
   Meinel G, 2009, BUILD RES INF, V37, P468, DOI 10.1080/09613210903159833
   Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government, 2017, ENGL HOUS SURV EPC I
   Mitchell G, 2011, ENVIRON PLANN A, V43, P2143, DOI 10.1068/a43570
   Pereira IM, 2013, ENERG POLICY, V59, P257, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.024
   Robinson D, 2007, SOL ENERGY, V81, P1196, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2007.06.002
   Siegal S., 1988, NONPARAMETRIC STAT B
   Thom H. C. S., 1958, MON WEATHER REV, V86, P117, DOI [DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1958)086, 10.1175/1520-0493(1958)086<0117:ANOTGD>2.0.CO;2, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1958)086<0117:ANOTGD>2.0.CO;2]
   Tuhus-Dubrow D, 2010, BUILD ENVIRON, V45, P1574, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.005
   Vanegas CA, 2010, COMPUT GRAPH FORUM, V29, P25, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01535.x
   Waddell P, 2003, NETW SPAT ECON, V3, P43, DOI 10.1023/A:1022049000877
   Wiginton LK, 2010, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V34, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.01.001
   Yu Z, 2011, ENERG BUILDINGS, V43, P1409, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.02.002
   Zhou B, 2008, TRANSPORT RES REC, P106, DOI 10.3141/2077-14
NR 38
TC 15
Z9 15
U1 1
U2 6
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0198-9715
EI 1873-7587
J9 COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN
JI Comput. Environ. Urban Syst.
PD NOV
PY 2015
VL 54
BP 280
EP 300
DI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.08.001
PG 21
WC Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Engineering,
   Environmental; Environmental Studies; Geography; Operations Research &
   Management Science; Regional & Urban Planning
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Computer Science; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology;
   Geography; Operations Research & Management Science; Public
   Administration
GA DB1YY
UT WOS:000368306700024
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Zhou, YF
   Zhang, LR
   Liu, JQ
   Wu, GL
   Savolainen, O
AF Zhou, Yongfeng
   Zhang, Lirui
   Liu, Jianquan
   Wu, Guili
   Savolainen, Outi
TI Climatic adaptation and ecological divergence between two closely
   related pine species in Southeast China
SO MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; divergent selection; ecological speciation; gene flow;
   landscape genetics; pine; population genetics
ID STRESS-RESPONSIVE GENES; NUCLEOTIDE DIVERSITY; LOCAL ADAPTATION;
   CONTRASTING PATTERNS; POPULATION-STRUCTURE; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; SEQUENCE
   VARIATION; MOLECULAR MARKERS; LATITUDINAL CLINE; COLD-ACCLIMATION
AB Climate is one of the most important drivers for adaptive evolution in forest trees. Climatic selection contributes greatly to local adaptation and intraspecific differentiation, but this kind of selection could also have promoted interspecific divergence through ecological speciation. To test this hypothesis, we examined intra-and interspecific genetic variation at 25 climate-related candidate genes and 12 reference loci in two closely related pine species, Pinus massoniana Lamb. and Pinus hwangshanensis Hisa, using population genetic and landscape genetic approaches. These two species occur in Southeast China but have contrasting ecological preferences in terms of several environmental variables, notably altitude, although hybrids form where their distributions overlap. One or more robust tests detected signals of recent and/or ancient selection at two-thirds (17) of the 25 candidate genes, at varying evolutionary timescales, but only three of the 12 reference loci. The signals of recent selection were species specific, but signals of ancient selection were mostly shared by the two species likely because of the shared evolutionary history. F-ST outlier analysis identified six SNPs in five climate-related candidate genes under divergent selection between the two species. In addition, a total of 24 candidate SNPs representing nine candidate genes showed significant correlation with altitudinal divergence in the two species based on the covariance matrix of population history derived from reference SNPs. Genetic differentiation between these two species was higher at the candidate genes than at the reference loci. Moreover, analysis using the isolation-with-migration model indicated that gene flow between the species has been more restricted for climate-related candidate genes than the reference loci, in both directions. Taken together, our results suggest that species-specific and divergent climatic selection at the candidate genes might have counteracted interspecific gene flow and played a key role in the ecological divergence of these two closely related pine species.
C1 [Zhou, Yongfeng; Zhang, Lirui; Liu, Jianquan; Wu, Guili] Lanzhou Univ, State Key Lab Grassland Agroecosyst, Sch Life Sci, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China.
   [Zhou, Yongfeng; Savolainen, Outi] Univ Oulu, Plant Genet Grp, Dept Biol, Oulu 90014, Finland.
   [Zhang, Lirui] Univ Zurich, Inst Systemat Bot, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
   [Savolainen, Outi] Univ Oulu, Bioctr Oulu, Oulu 90014, Finland.
C3 Lanzhou University; University of Oulu; University of Zurich; University
   of Oulu
RP Liu, JQ (corresponding author), Lanzhou Univ, State Key Lab Grassland Agroecosyst, Sch Life Sci, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China.
EM liujq@lzu.edu.cn
RI Zhou, Yongfeng/GQA-9022-2022; Liu, Jianquan/JFK-5880-2023
OI Liu, Jianquan/0000-0002-4237-7418; Zhou, Yongfeng/0000-0003-0780-2973
FU National Key Project for Basic Research [2014CB954100, 2012CB114504];
   National Natural Science Foundation of China [30725004]; '111'
   collaboration Program; Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC) [2010618044];
   Center for International Mobility (CIMO, Finland); Biocenter Oulu
FX We thank Dr. Victoria Sork and four anonymous reviewers for their
   careful reviews and valuable comments. We are grateful for useful
   discussions with Dr. Remy Petit, Dr. Delphine Grivet, Dr. Tanja
   Pyhajarvi and Dr. Sebastian Ramos-Onsins. We thank Dr Bin Tian and
   Xingmin Tian for their help in collecting samples. This research was
   supported by grants from the National Key Project for Basic Research
   (2014CB954100, 2012CB114504), the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (30725004) and the '111' collaboration Program. Data analyses were
   partly conducted on computer clusters in the Finnish IT Center for
   Science (CSC). Y.Z.'s stay in Finland was supported by the Chinese
   Scholarship Council (CSC NO. 2010618044), the funding from the Center
   for International Mobility (CIMO, Finland) and Biocenter Oulu (to O.S.).
CR Aitken SN, 2008, EVOL APPL, V1, P95, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2007.00013.x
   Alberto FJ, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P1645, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12181
   Ann W, 2007, MOL BIOL EVOL, V24, P90, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msl131
   [Anonymous], PLANT AN GEN 14 C SA
   [Anonymous], J ANHUI FORESTRY SCI
   Barton NH, 2000, PHILOS T R SOC B, V355, P1553, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2000.0716
   Beaumont MA, 1996, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V263, P1619, DOI 10.1098/rspb.1996.0237
   Bower AD, 2008, AM J BOT, V95, P66, DOI 10.3732/ajb.95.1.66
   Brown GR, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P15255, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0404231101
   Bustamante CD, 2002, NATURE, V416, P531, DOI 10.1038/416531a
   Chen J, 2010, HEREDITY, V104, P3, DOI 10.1038/hdy.2009.88
   Chen J, 2012, GENETICS, V191, P865, DOI 10.1534/genetics.112.140749
   Chiang YC, 2006, MOL ECOL, V15, P765, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02833.x
   Close TJ, 1997, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V100, P291, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1997.1000210.x
   Coop G, 2010, GENETICS, V185, P1411, DOI 10.1534/genetics.110.114819
   CRUZ RT, 1992, PLANT PHYSIOL, V99, P203, DOI 10.1104/pp.99.1.203
   De Mita S, 2013, MOL ECOL, V22, P1383, DOI 10.1111/mec.12182
   Dubos C, 2003, TREE PHYSIOL, V23, P169, DOI 10.1093/treephys/23.3.169
   Dvornyk V, 2002, MOL BIOL EVOL, V19, P179, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004070
   Eckert AJ, 2010, GENETICS, V185, P969, DOI 10.1534/genetics.110.115543
   Eckert AJ, 2009, GENETICS, V183, P289, DOI 10.1534/genetics.109.103895
   Edgar RC, 2004, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V32, P1792, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkh340
   Eilertson KE, 2012, PLOS COMPUT BIOL, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002806
   Evanno G, 2005, MOL ECOL, V14, P2611, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
   Eveno E, 2008, MOL BIOL EVOL, V25, P417, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msm272
   Excoffier L, 2009, HEREDITY, V103, P285, DOI 10.1038/hdy.2009.74
   Feder JL, 2012, TRENDS GENET, V28, P342, DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2012.03.009
   Fisher R.A., 1999, GENETICAL THEORY NAT
   Foll M, 2008, GENETICS, V180, P977, DOI 10.1534/genetics.108.092221
   Franks SJ, 2012, ANNU REV GENET, V46, P185, DOI 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155511
   Fu L., 1999, FLORA CHINA, P15
   FukasawaAkada T, 1996, PLANT MOL BIOL, V30, P711, DOI 10.1007/BF00019006
   García-Gil MR, 2003, MOL ECOL, V12, P1195, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01826.x
   Garrigan D, 2010, MOL BIOL EVOL, V27, P73, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msp209
   Gavrilets S, 1998, EVOLUTION, V52, P1277, DOI 10.2307/2411297
   Ge XJ, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0043717
   Gernandt DS, 2005, TAXON, V54, P29, DOI 10.2307/25065300
   González-Martínez SC, 2006, GENETICS, V172, P1915, DOI 10.1534/genetics.105.047126
   Gossmann TI, 2010, MOL BIOL EVOL, V27, P1822, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msq079
   Grivet D, 2011, MOL BIOL EVOL, V28, P101, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msq190
   Grivet D, 2009, NEW PHYTOL, V184, P1016, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03015.x
   Günther T, 2013, GENETICS, V195, P205, DOI 10.1534/genetics.113.152462
   Hahn MW, 2008, EVOLUTION, V62, P255, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00308.x
   Hall D, 2011, MOL ECOL, V20, P1463, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05014.x
   Hedrick P., 2011, Genetics of Populations
   Hermisson J, 2005, GENETICS, V169, P2335, DOI 10.1534/genetics.104.036947
   Hey J, 2004, GENETICS, V167, P747, DOI 10.1534/genetics.103.024182
   Hey J, 2010, MOL BIOL EVOL, V27, P905, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msp296
   HILL W G, 1968, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, V38, P226, DOI 10.1007/BF01245622
   Hoffmann AA, 2011, NATURE, V470, P479, DOI 10.1038/nature09670
   Hohenlohe PA, 2010, INT J PLANT SCI, V171, P1059, DOI 10.1086/656306
   Holliday JA, 2012, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V279, P1675, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2011.1805
   Holliday JA, 2010, NEW PHYTOL, V188, P501, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03380.x
   Howe GT, 1996, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V97, P95, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1996.tb00484.x
   Howe GT, 2003, CAN J BOT, V81, P1247, DOI [10.1139/b03-141, 10.1139/B03-141]
   Hua X, 2013, AM NAT, V182, P1, DOI 10.1086/670690
   Hubisz MJ, 2009, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V9, P1322, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02591.x
   HUDSON RR, 1987, GENETICS, V116, P153
   Ingvarsson PK, 2004, GENET RES, V83, P31, DOI 10.1017/S0016672303006529
   Jeffreys H., 1961, Oxford Classics Series, V3rd
   Joosen RVL, 2006, TREE PHYSIOL, V26, P1297, DOI 10.1093/treephys/26.10.1297
   Keller I, 2012, MOL ECOL, V21, P782, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05397.x
   Keller SR, 2012, MOL BIOL EVOL, V29, P3143, DOI 10.1093/molbev/mss121
   Keller SR, 2011, GENETICS, V188, P941, DOI 10.1534/genetics.111.128041
   Kujala ST, 2012, TREE GENET GENOMES, V8, P1451, DOI 10.1007/s11295-012-0532-5
   Lenormand T, 2002, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V17, P183, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02497-7
   Leslie AB, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P16217, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1213621109
   Li HP, 2011, MOL BIOL EVOL, V28, P365, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msq211
   Li SX, 2012, TREE GENET GENOMES, V8, P1371, DOI 10.1007/s11295-012-0524-5
   Li SX, 2010, BMC PLANT BIOL, V10, DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-10-37
   Li Y, 2010, MOL BIOL EVOL, V27, P1001, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msp301
   Li ZH, 2012, EVOLUTION, V66, P831, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01466.x
   Librado P, 2009, BIOINFORMATICS, V25, P1451, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187
   Lorenz WW, 2006, TREE PHYSIOL, V26, P1, DOI 10.1093/treephys/26.1.1
   Luo ShiJia Luo ShiJia, 2001, Scientia Silvae Sinicae, V37, P118
   Ma XF, 2006, MOL BIOL EVOL, V23, P807, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msj100
   Ma XF, 2010, GENETICS, V186, P1033, DOI 10.1534/genetics.110.120873
   Mao KS, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P7793, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1114319109
   Mayr E., 1963, Animal speciation and evolution
   MCDONALD JH, 1991, NATURE, V351, P652, DOI 10.1038/351652a0
   Morgenstern E.K., 1996, Geographic variation in forest trees: genetic basis and application of knowledge in silviculture
   Morjan CL, 2004, MOL ECOL, V13, P1341, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02164.x
   Mosca E, 2012, MOL ECOL, V21, P5530, DOI 10.1111/mec.12043
   Nei M., 1987, MOL EVOLUTIONARY GEN, DOI DOI 10.7312/NEI-92038-010
   Nielsen R, 2001, GENETICS, V158, P885
   Nielsen R, 2005, ANNU REV GENET, V39, P197, DOI 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.112420
   Nosil P, 2012, OX ECOL EV, P1, DOI 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199587100.001.0001
   Nosil P, 2009, MOL ECOL, V18, P375, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03946.x
   Olson MS, 2013, MOL ECOL, V22, P1214, DOI 10.1111/mec.12067
   Ometto L, 2006, BIOL LETT-UK, V2, P604, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0521
   Palmé AE, 2009, MOL BIOL EVOL, V26, P893, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msp010
   Pavlidis P, 2012, MOL BIOL EVOL, V29, P3237, DOI 10.1093/molbev/mss136
   Pavlidis P, 2012, GENETICS, V192, P225, DOI 10.1534/genetics.112.142547
   Prunier J, 2012, MOL ECOL, V21, P4270, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05691.x
   Prunier J, 2011, MOL ECOL, V20, P1702, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05045.x
   Pyhäjärvi T, 2007, GENETICS, V177, P1713, DOI 10.1534/genetics.107.077099
   Raats M. M., 1992, Food Quality and Preference, V3, P89, DOI 10.1016/0950-3293(91)90028-D
   RAYMO ME, 1994, ANNU REV EARTH PL SC, V22, P353, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ea.22.050194.002033
   Ren GP, 2012, HEREDITY, V108, P552, DOI 10.1038/hdy.2011.123
   Richardson BA, 2009, INT J PLANT SCI, V170, P1120, DOI 10.1086/605870
   Rieseberg LH, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P12242, DOI 10.1073/pnas.192360899
   Rieseberg LH, 2001, TAXON, V50, P47, DOI 10.2307/1224511
   Rundle HD, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P336, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00715.x
   Savolainen O, 2007, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V38, P595, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095646
   Savolainen O, 2013, NAT REV GENET, V14, P807, DOI 10.1038/nrg3522
   Savolainen O, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P49, DOI 10.1126/science.1213788
   Savolainen O, 2011, J HERED, V102, P526, DOI 10.1093/jhered/esr056
   Schluter D, 2000, AM NAT, V156, pS4, DOI 10.1086/303412
   Schluter D, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P9955, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0901264106
   Schluter D, 2009, SCIENCE, V323, P737, DOI 10.1126/science.1160006
   Schwander T, 2011, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V26, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2010.12.010
   Servedio MR, 2011, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V26, P389, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.04.005
   SLATKIN M, 1987, SCIENCE, V236, P787, DOI 10.1126/science.3576198
   Slatkin M., 1976, P767
   Smith H, 2000, NATURE, V407, P585, DOI 10.1038/35036500
   Sork VL, 2010, MOL ECOL, V19, P3806, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04726.x
   Sousa VC, 2013, GENETICS, V194, P211, DOI 10.1534/genetics.113.149211
   TAJIMA F, 1989, GENETICS, V123, P585
   Tamura K, 2011, MOL BIOL EVOL, V28, P2731, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msr121
   TIEDEMANN R, 1994, PALEOCEANOGRAPHY, V9, P619, DOI 10.1029/94PA00208
   Toivainen T, 2014, MOL ECOL, V23, P1040, DOI 10.1111/mec.12682
   Velasco-Conde T, 2012, TREE GENET GENOMES, V8, P957, DOI 10.1007/s11295-012-0476-9
   Wachowiak W, 2009, TREE GENET GENOMES, V5, P117, DOI 10.1007/s11295-008-0188-3
   Wachowiak W, 2011, MOL ECOL, V20, P1729, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05037.x
   Wang XR, 1999, AM J BOT, V86, P1742, DOI 10.2307/2656672
   WATTERSON GA, 1975, THEOR POPUL BIOL, V7, P256, DOI 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9
   Wei H, 2006, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V29, P558, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01432.x
   Wright S, 1930, J HERED, V21, P349, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a103361
   Wright SI, 2004, GENETICS, V168, P1071, DOI 10.1534/genetics.104.026500
   Wu CI, 2004, NAT REV GENET, V5, P114, DOI 10.1038/nrg1269
   Wu CI, 2001, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V14, P851, DOI 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00335.x
   Wu Z.Y., 1980, VEGETATION CHINA
   Yakovlev IA, 2008, PLANTA, V228, P459, DOI 10.1007/s00425-008-0750-0
   Yoder JB, 2014, GENETICS, V196, P1263, DOI 10.1534/genetics.113.159319
   Zachos J, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P686, DOI 10.1126/science.1059412
   Zeng K, 2007, MOL BIOL EVOL, V24, P1898, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msm119
   Zhou YF, 2010, EVOLUTION, V64, P2342, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00988.x
NR 137
TC 35
Z9 39
U1 2
U2 157
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0962-1083
EI 1365-294X
J9 MOL ECOL
JI Mol. Ecol.
PD JUL
PY 2014
VL 23
IS 14
BP 3504
EP 3522
DI 10.1111/mec.12830
PG 19
WC Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Ecology; Evolutionary Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Environmental Sciences & Ecology;
   Evolutionary Biology
GA AL8LB
UT WOS:000339389000010
PM 24935279
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Souza, KS
   Fortunato, DS
   Jardim, L
   Terribile, LC
   Lima-Ribeiro, MS
   Mariano, CA
   Pinto-Ledezma, JN
   Loyola, R
   Dobrovolski, R
   Rangel, TF
   Machado, IF
   Rocha, T
   Batista, MG
   Lorini, ML
   Vale, MM
   Navas, CA
   Maciel, NM
   Villalobos, F
   Olalla-Tarraga, MA
   Rodrigues, JFM
   Gouveia, SF
   Diniz, JAF
AF Souza, Kelly Silva
   Fortunato, Danilo Siqueira
   Jardim, Lucas
   Terribile, Levi Carina
   Lima-Ribeiro, Matheus Souza
   Mariano, Camilla Avila
   Pinto-Ledezma, Jesus Nazareno
   Loyola, Rafael
   Dobrovolski, Ricardo
   Rangel, Thiago Fernando
   Machado, Ibere Farina
   Rocha, Taina
   Batista, Mariana Gomes
   Lorini, Maria Lucia
   Vale, Mariana Moncassim
   Navas, Carlos Arturo
   Maciel, Natan Medeiros
   Villalobos, Fabricio
   Olalla-Tarraga, Miguel Angelo
   Mota Rodrigues, Joao Fabricio
   Gouveia, Sidney Feitosa
   Felizola Diniz-Filho, Jose Alexandre
TI Evolutionary rescue and geographic range shifts under climate change for
   global amphibians
SO FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
LA English
DT Article
DE eco-evolutionary models; dispersal; thermal tolerance; macroecology;
   extinction
ID RAPID EVOLUTION; EXTINCTION RISK; R PACKAGE; ADAPTATION; RESPONSES;
   BIODIVERSITY; FUTURE; RATES; DISTRIBUTIONS; CONSERVATION
AB By the end of this century, human-induced climate change and habitat loss may drastically reduce biodiversity, with expected effects on many amphibian lineages. One of these effects is the shift in the geographic distributions of species when tracking suitable climates. Here, we employ a macroecological approach to dynamically model geographic range shifts by coupling ecological niche models and eco-evolutionary mechanisms, aiming to assess the probability of evolutionary rescue (i.e., rapid adaptation) and dispersal under climate change. Evolutionary models estimated the probability of population persistence by adapting to changes in the temperature influenced by precipitation in the following decades, while compensating the fitness reduction and maintaining viable populations in the new climates. In addition, we evaluated emerging patterns of species richness and turnover at the assemblage level. Our approach was able to identify which amphibian populations among 7,193 species at the global scale could adapt to temperature changes or disperse into suitable regions in the future. Without evolutionary adaptation and dispersal, 47.7% of the species could go extinct until the year 2,100, whereas adding both processes will slightly decrease this extinction rate to 36.5%. Although adaptation to climate is possible for populations in about 25.7% of species, evolutionary rescue is the only possibility to avoid extinction in 4.2% of them. Dispersal will allow geographic range shifts for 49.7% of species, but only 6.5% may avoid extinction by reaching climatically suitable environments. This reconfiguration of species distributions and their persistence creates new assemblage-level patterns at the local scale. Temporal beta-diversity across the globe showed relatively low levels of species turnover, mainly due to the loss of species. Despite limitations with obtaining data, our approach provides more realistic assessments of species responses to ongoing climate changes. It shows that, although dispersal and evolutionary rescue may attenuate species losses, they are not enough to avoid a significant reduction of species' geographic ranges in the future. Actions that guarantee a higher potential of adaptation (e.g., genetic diversity through larger population sizes) and increased connectivity for species dispersion to track suitable climates become essential, increasing the resilience of biodiversity to climate change.
C1 [Souza, Kelly Silva; Fortunato, Danilo Siqueira; Jardim, Lucas; Mariano, Camilla Avila; Batista, Mariana Gomes] Univ Fed Goias, Inst Biol Sci V, Lab Theoret Ecol & Synth, Goiania, Brazil.
   [Terribile, Levi Carina; Lima-Ribeiro, Matheus Souza; Mota Rodrigues, Joao Fabricio] Fed Univ Jatai, Acad Unit Biol Sci, Macroecol Lab, Jatai, GO, Brazil.
   [Pinto-Ledezma, Jesus Nazareno] Univ Minnesota, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, Minneapolis, MN USA.
   [Loyola, Rafael; Rangel, Thiago Fernando; Maciel, Natan Medeiros; Felizola Diniz-Filho, Jose Alexandre] Univ Fed Goias, Inst Biol Sci V, Dept Ecol, Goiania, Brazil.
   [Dobrovolski, Ricardo] Univ Fed Bahia, Inst Biol, Salvador, Brazil.
   [Machado, Ibere Farina] Boitata Inst & PDJ CNPq, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
   [Rocha, Taina] Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Biodivers Res Program, Belem, PA, Brazil.
   [Lorini, Maria Lucia] Univ Fed Estado Rio de Janeiro, Inst Biosci, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
   [Vale, Mariana Moncassim] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Dept Ecol, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
   [Navas, Carlos Arturo] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Biosci, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
   [Villalobos, Fabricio] Inst Ecol, Red Biol Evolut, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
   [Olalla-Tarraga, Miguel Angelo] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Dept Biol & Geol Phys & Inorgan Chem, Biodivers & Macroecol Lab, Madrid, Spain.
   [Gouveia, Sidney Feitosa] Univ Fed Sergipe, CCBS, Dept Ecol, Aracaju, SE, Brazil.
C3 Universidade Federal de Goias; University of Minnesota System;
   University of Minnesota Twin Cities; Universidade Federal de Goias;
   Universidade Federal da Bahia; Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi;
   Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; Universidade Federal
   do Rio de Janeiro; Universidade de Sao Paulo; Instituto de Ecologia -
   Mexico; Universidad Rey Juan Carlos; Universidade Federal de Sergipe
RP Souza, KS (corresponding author), Univ Fed Goias, Inst Biol Sci V, Lab Theoret Ecol & Synth, Goiania, Brazil.
EM kellysouzaecol@gmail.com
RI Gouveia, Sidney/G-6438-2013; Dobrovolski, Ricardo/B-2580-2013; Diniz,
   José/ABC-2060-2020; Souza, Kelly/JDC-7474-2023; Olalla-Tárraga,
   Miguel/ABE-7880-2020; Maciel, Natan/D-8741-2013; Terribile,
   Levi/AAW-1102-2021; Navas, Carlos/B-2138-2013; Loyola,
   Rafael/A-4425-2008; Villalobos, Fabricio/J-6246-2012; Rodrigues,
   Joao/B-4877-2016; Vale, Mariana/I-9408-2012; Jardim,
   Lucas/AAY-6676-2020; Lorini, Maria/I-2172-2014; Machado,
   Ibere/A-2265-2013; Pinto Ledezma, Jesus N./E-7984-2014; Rangel,
   Thiago/H-8708-2012
OI Pinto Ledezma, Jesus N./0000-0001-6668-9670; Rangel,
   Thiago/0000-0002-2001-7382; Olalla-Tarraga, Miguel
   Angel/0000-0001-5346-4528; Souza, Kelly/0000-0002-5672-4556
FU INCT
FX This paper results from a working group on "Evolutionary Rescue"
   promoted by National Institute for Science and Technology (INCT) in
   Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity Conservation, supported by
   MCTIC/CNPq (proc. 465610/2014-5) and FAPEG (proc. 201810267000023aq).
   JPL was supported by the US National Science Foundation (DEB 2017843 to
   JPL) and the University of Minnesota President's Postdoctoral Fellowship
   Program. JAFDF, RL, RDL, RD, MMV, TFR, CAN, SFG, NMM, LCT receive
   Productivity in ResearchFellowshipsfrom Conselho Nacional de
   Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico do Brasil (CNPq). KSS, DF, LJ,
   JFMR, TR received INCT fellowships, CAM received CNPq fellowship, and
   KSS, MCGB received CAPES Doctoral or Master fellowships during the
   realization of this work.
CR Almeida-Neto M, 2012, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V21, P772, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00709.x
   Alroy J, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P13003, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1508681112
   Anderson RCO, 2017, ECOL EVOL, V7, P9066, DOI 10.1002/ece3.3219
   Araújo MB, 2005, ECOGRAPHY, V28, P693, DOI 10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04253.x
   Araújo MB, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aat4858
   Araújo MB, 2012, ECOLOGY, V93, P1527, DOI 10.1890/11-1930.1
   Bartoszek K, 2017, J THEOR BIOL, V429, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.06.011
   Baselga A., 2018, Package 'Betapart'. Partitioning Beta Diversity into Turnover and Nestedness Components, Version, P1
   Baselga A, 2010, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V19, P134, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x
   Baselga A, 2012, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V3, P808, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00224.x
   Beebee TJC, 2005, BIOL CONSERV, V125, P271, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.009
   Bell G, 2017, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V48, P605, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110316-023011
   Bell G, 2013, PHILOS T R SOC B, V368, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2012.0080
   Bell G, 2009, ECOL LETT, V12, P942, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01350.x
   Blomberg SP, 2003, EVOLUTION, V57, P717, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x
   Blows MW, 2007, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V20, P39, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01241.x
   Broennimann O, 2007, ECOL LETT, V10, P701, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01060.x
   Bush A, 2016, ECOL LETT, V19, P1468, DOI 10.1111/ele.12696
   Capellán-Pérez I, 2016, ENERG ENVIRON SCI, V9, P2482, DOI 10.1039/c6ee01008c
   Caplat P, 2016, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V14, P262, DOI 10.1002/fee.1280
   Carlson SM, 2014, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V29, P521, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2014.06.005
   Ceballos G, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P13596, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1922686117
   Chen IC, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P1024, DOI 10.1126/science.1206432
   Chevin LM, 2010, PLOS BIOL, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000357
   Collins J.P., 2009, Extinction in our times: global amphibian decline
   Colwell RK, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P19651, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0901650106
   Corn P. S., 2005, Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, V28, P59
   Cotto O, 2017, NAT COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1038/ncomms15399
   Diamond SE, 2017, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1389, P5, DOI 10.1111/nyas.13223
   Diniz JAF, 2019, ECOGRAPHY, V42, P1124, DOI 10.1111/ecog.04264
   Duan RY, 2016, PEERJ, V4, DOI 10.7717/peerj.2185
   Engler R, 2009, ECOGRAPHY, V32, P34, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05789.x
   Enriquez-Urzelai U, 2020, J ANIM ECOL, V89, P1722, DOI 10.1111/1365-2656.13222
   Diniz JAF, 2019, PERSPECT ECOL CONSER, V17, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.pecon.2019.06.001
   Foden WB, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0065427
   Franklin J., 2010, Mapping Species Distributions: Spatial Inference and Prediction
   García-Rodríguez A, 2021, AM NAT, V198, pE68, DOI 10.1086/715500
   Gaston K.G., 2000, PATTERN PROCESS MACR, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470999592
   Gibbons JW, 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P653, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0653:TGDORD]2.0.CO;2
   Gingerich PD, 2001, GENETICA, V112, P127, DOI 10.1023/A:1013311015886
   Gonzalez A, 2013, PHILOS T R SOC B, V368, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2012.0404
   Guisan A., 2017, Habitat Suitability and Distribution Models: With Applications in R
   Haddad NM, 2015, SCI ADV, V1, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1500052
   Hausfather Z, 2020, NATURE, V577, P618, DOI 10.1038/d41586-020-00177-3
   Hof C, 2011, NATURE, V480, P516, DOI 10.1038/nature10650
   IUCN, 2016, The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
   Jetz W, 2018, NAT ECOL EVOL, V2, P850, DOI 10.1038/s41559-018-0515-5
   Jones EI, 2012, AM NAT, V179, pE28, DOI 10.1086/663678
   Kearney M, 2009, ECOL LETT, V12, P334, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01277.x
   Khabbazian M, 2016, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V7, P811, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12534
   King NG, 2018, ECOGRAPHY, V41, P1469, DOI 10.1111/ecog.03186
   Koleff P, 2003, J ANIM ECOL, V72, P367, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00710.x
   Kopp M, 2014, EVOL APPL, V7, P169, DOI 10.1111/eva.12127
   Lavergne S, 2010, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V41, P321, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144628
   Legendre P, 2019, ECOL EVOL, V9, P3500, DOI 10.1002/ece3.4984
   LimaRibeiro M. S., 2015, BIODIVERS INFORM, V10, P1, DOI 10.17161/bi.v10i0.4955
   Lindsey HA, 2013, NATURE, V494, P463, DOI 10.1038/nature11879
   Manes S, 2022, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V22, DOI 10.1007/s10113-022-01904-4
   Manes S, 2021, BIOL CONSERV, V257, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109070
   Mendelson JR, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P48, DOI 10.1126/science.1128396
   Munguía M, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0034420
   Nicholson E, 2021, NAT ECOL EVOL, V5, P1338, DOI 10.1038/s41559-021-01538-5
   Norberg J, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P747, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1588, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1588]
   Oliveira BF, 2017, SCI DATA, V4, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2017.123
   Olson DM, 2001, BIOSCIENCE, V51, P933, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2
   Orme D., 2014, CAPER COMP ANAL PHYL
   Pachauri R.K., 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014
   Peterson A. T., 2011, Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions
   Phillips BL, 2006, NATURE, V439, P803, DOI 10.1038/439803a
   Pinto SM, 2010, AM NAT, V175, P675, DOI 10.1086/652467
   Pinto-Ledezma J.N., 2020, REMOTE SENSING PLANT, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-33157-3_9, 10.1007/978-3-030-33157-3_9]
   Quintero I, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P1095, DOI 10.1111/ele.12144
   R Core Team, 2019, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
   Revell LJ, 2012, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V3, P217, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x
   Ribeiro BR, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0165073
   Ritchie J, 2017, ENERGY, V140, P1276, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.083
   Rossetto M, 2008, AM J BOT, V95, P321, DOI 10.3732/ajb.95.3.321
   Schwartz MK, 2007, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V22, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2006.08.009
   Skelly DK, 2007, CONSERV BIOL, V21, P1353, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00764.x
   Soberón J, 2007, ECOGRAPHY, V30, P152, DOI 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04627.x
   Souza K. S., 2019, Front Biogeogr, V11, P43511, DOI [10.21425/f5fbg43511, DOI 10.21425/F5FBG43511, 10.21425/F5FBG43511]
   Stuart SN, 2004, SCIENCE, V306, P1783, DOI 10.1126/science.1103538
   Swenson NG, 2014, ECOGRAPHY, V37, P1056, DOI 10.1111/ecog.00763
   Taheri S, 2021, SCI ADV, V7, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abe1110
   Thomas CD, 2004, NATURE, V427, P145, DOI 10.1038/nature02121
   Tourinho L, 2023, INTEGR ZOOL, V18, P93, DOI 10.1111/1749-4877.12618
   Tourinho L, 2021, ECOL MODEL, V457, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109687
   Trew BT, 2021, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V30, P768, DOI 10.1111/geb.13272
   Urban MC, 2015, SCIENCE, V348, P571, DOI 10.1126/science.aaa4984
   Urban MC, 2014, EVOL APPL, V7, P88, DOI 10.1111/eva.12114
   Urban MC, 2012, EVOL APPL, V5, P154, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00208.x
   Valladares F, 2014, ECOL LETT, V17, P1351, DOI 10.1111/ele.12348
   Vilela Bruno, 2018, Oecologia Australis, V22, P130, DOI 10.4257/oeco.2018.2202.03
   Vilela B, 2015, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V6, P1229, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12401
   Villemant C, 2011, BIOL CONSERV, V144, P2142, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.009
   Visser ME, 2008, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V275, P649, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2007.0997
   Zurell D, 2020, ECOGRAPHY, V43, P1261, DOI 10.1111/ecog.04960
NR 97
TC 8
Z9 9
U1 3
U2 30
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
SN 2296-701X
J9 FRONT ECOL EVOL
JI Front. Ecol. Evol.
PD FEB 10
PY 2023
VL 11
AR 1038018
DI 10.3389/fevo.2023.1038018
PG 13
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 9F4QL
UT WOS:000937454600001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Barnes, J
   Dow, K
AF Barnes, Janice
   Dow, Kirstin
TI Water AND Heat: Intervening in Adaptation Hazard Bias
SO FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE
LA English
DT Article
DE hazard bias; climate adaptation; extreme heat; health inequities; flood
   management
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; VULNERABILITY; RISKS
AB After centuries of adapting to coastal living, increases in stormwater and tidal flooding events, along with projected sea level rise, led Charleston, South Carolina, USA to define flooding as an existential threat to the city. With billions of planned flood management projects underway, and additional billions of federal disaster flood recovery funds allocated to the State of South Carolina, the Governor's office established a South Carolina Office of Resilience in September 2020, with a focus on water management. The City of Charleston developed its own Flooding and Sea Level Rise Strategy. Simultaneously, the fourth National Climate Assessment pointed to heat health risks and projected costs of lost labor productivity concentrated in the Southeast, yet local recognition of heat as an equivalent threat to flooding was not apparent. Although Charleston's All Hazards Vulnerability Assessment included extreme heat as a significant hazard, without a group focused on heat, ongoing work in the city continued to prioritize water management as annual flood events rapidly escalated. This narrow adaptation framing was further solidified as funding focused on flood recovery and adaptation and technical experts worked within water-related boundaries. These interacting forces led to Hazard Bias, an inherent organizational process of reinforcing focus on a single hazard in the context of compound, complex hazard risks. To adapt to increasing heat, Charleston will need to raise compound risk awareness and adjust its capital investments in resilience to be inclusive of heat mitigation and adaptation as well as water. Yet in 2020 Charleston lacked basic urban heat data, technical expertise, and a strong source of motivation to develop a prioritization approach for recognizing multiple risks and complementary adaptation opportunities in those investments. Recognizing the inherent bias, a new coalition of heat researchers, practitioners, and health experts launched a tripartite heat-health research program and spurred the development of a new heat network in Charleston. The network reduced hazard bias by raising heat-health risk awareness and by intervening in adaptation planning to broaden water-only considerations to be inclusive of water AND heat. This paper provides a detailed case study how the intersections of multiple networks, messengers, and messages contributed to broadening the local resilience agenda from a "hazard bias" and how the lessons learned during this transformative process further reveal health inequities.
C1 [Barnes, Janice] Climate Adaptat Partners, New York, NY USA.
   [Dow, Kirstin] Univ South Carolina, Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Geog, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
C3 University of South Carolina System; University of South Carolina
   Columbia
RP Dow, K (corresponding author), Univ South Carolina, Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Geog, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
EM kdow@sc.edu
FU National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NA16OAR4310163]
FX This research was supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
   Administration, Regional Integrated Sciences and Assessments Program
   Award #NA16OAR4310163.
CR Amsterdam Institute of Advanced Metropolitan Solutions (AIAMS), 2020, CIT AMST LAUNCH CLIM
   [Anonymous], 2021, LANCET, V398, P641, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01860-2
   [Anonymous], 2019, Flooding Sea Level Rise Strategy
   [Anonymous], ABOUT US
   Barnes J., 2022, HAZARD BIAS
   Burkart KG, 2021, LANCET, V398, P685, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01700-1
   CISA Carolinas Integrated Sciences and Assessments, 2019, CONV CLIM HLTH VULN
   CISA Carolinas Integrated Sciences and Assessments, 2019, EN POV CONV CLIM HLT
   City of Charleston, 2022, ABOUT US
   City of Charleston, 2022, OFFICIAL BUDGET DOCU
   City of Charleston, 2020, TREE CAN PROGR
   City of Charleston, 2020, STORMWATER MANAGEMEN
   City of Charleston, 2019, DUTCH DIALOGUES
   City of Charleston, 2021, SPECIAL COMMISSION E
   City of Charleston, 2015, 2015 SEA LEVEL RISE
   City of Charleston, 2021, STREET TREE STOR
   City of Charleston, 2020, ART 5 TRANSP AN DRAW
   City of Charleston/Fernleaf Interactive, 2020, ALL HAZ VULN RISK AS
   College of Charleston, 2019, CHARL AR REG TRANS A
   College of Charleston, 2019, TOUR AN ANN REP
   Duke University, 2022, SE EN INS STAK IN
   Eriksen SH, 2007, CLIM POLICY, V7, P337, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685660
   FEMA, 2022, DECL DIS
   Fisher Sheehan and Colton, 2017, HOM EN AFF GAP
   Global Heat Health Information Network (GHHIN), 2022, HEAT HLTH
   Goodrich KA, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V42, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.001
   Guinn Center, 2021, EXTR HEAT EXP CRIT G
   Hernández D, 2016, SOC SCI MED, V167, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.029
   Hoffman J., 2017, THROWING SHADE RVA
   Hoffman JS, 2020, CLIMATE, V8, DOI 10.3390/cli8010012
   House T.W., 2021, FACT SHEET: President biden signs executive order catalyzing America's clean energy economy through federal sustainability, DOI DOI 10.21203/RS.3.PEX-1666/V1
   Howe PD, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P6743, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1813145116
   Hsu A, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22799-5
   Imagine the Wall, 2020, ABOUT US
   IPCC, 2021, CONTRIBUTION WORKING, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009157896
   Jessel S, 2019, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00357
   Johnson C., 2016, SOME CANT AFFORD AIR
   Kehler S, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V124, P471, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.025
   Keith Meerow., 2020, J EXTREME EVENTS, DOI DOI 10.1142/S2345737620500037
   Klok EJ, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V23, P342, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.10.005
   Lavell A, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, P25
   Marino E, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P323, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.03.001
   Medical University of South Carolina, PUBL TRANS INC PROGR
   National Integrated Heat Health Information System (NIHHIS), 2022, ABOUT US
   National Weather Service (NWS), 2022, 80 YEAR LIST SEV WEA
   National Weather Service (NWS), 2020, GLOSS NOAAS NAT WEAT
   National Weather Service (NWS), 2022, PRES FUT HIGH TID FL
   NCEI, 2022, Storm Events Database
   OSHA, 2021, HEAT OV WORK OUTD IN
   Painter W., 2022, The Disaster Relief Fund: Overview and Issues
   Phillips N, 2021, J RACIAL ETHN HEALTH, V8, P1153, DOI 10.1007/s40615-020-00871-y
   Raymond C, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P611, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0790-4
   Reidmiller D.R., 2018, IMPACTS RISKS ADAPTA, P4
   Robert T., 1988, Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act
   State of South Carolina, 2021, ABOUT US
   State of South Carolina, 2020, DIS REL RES ACT
   State of South Carolina, 2022, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON
   Strassberg G., 2021, NOAA NCEI Tech. Rep.
   Sustainability Institute, 2022, WEATH
   Texas Energy Poverty Research Institute (TEPRI) and Southeast Energy Efficiency Alliance (SEEA), 2021, EN INS S ARCGIS STOR
   The Nature Conservancy and Southern Environmental Law Center, 2022, DIS REC MIT S CAR
   Union of Concerned Scientists, 2019, KILL HEAT US CLIM CH
   US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2022, CHARL PEN COAST STOR
   US Climate Resilience Toolkit (USCRT), 2022, US CLIM RES TOOLK TE
   US Department of Commerce NOAA, 2022, WETBULB GLOB TEMP WE
   Ward A, 2019, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V63, P1611, DOI 10.1007/s00484-019-01773-3
   Zscheischler J, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P469, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0156-3
NR 67
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 2
U2 6
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2624-9553
J9 FRONT CLIM
JI Front. Clim.
PD JUN 29
PY 2022
VL 4
AR 868017
DI 10.3389/fclim.2022.868017
PG 14
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA L4VS1
UT WOS:001023264500001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Ratcliffe, H
   Ahlering, M
   Carlson, D
   Vacek, S
   Allstadt, A
   Dee, LE
AF Ratcliffe, Hugh
   Ahlering, Marissa
   Carlson, Daren
   Vacek, Sara
   Allstadt, Andrew
   Dee, Laura E.
TI Invasive species do not exploit early growing seasons in burned
   tallgrass prairies
SO ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE climate adaptation; climate change; grassland management; growing
   season; phenology; prescribed burning; spring timing
ID CHANGE ADAPTATION STRATEGIES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; NORTH-DAKOTA; FLOWERING
   PHENOLOGY; GRASSLAND; DIVERSITY; PLANT; FIRE; CONSERVATION; RESPONSES
AB Invasive species management is key to conserving critically threatened native prairie ecosystems. While prescribed burning is widely demonstrated to increase native diversity and suppress invasive species, elucidating the conditions under which burning is most effective remains an ongoing focus of applied prairie ecology research. Understanding how conservation management interacts with climate is increasingly pressing, because climate change is altering weather conditions and seasonal timing around the world. Increasingly early growing seasons due to climate change are shifting the timing and availability of resources and niche space, which may disproportionately advantage invasive species and influence the outcome of burning. We estimated the effects of burning, start time of the growing season, and their interaction on invasive species relative cover and frequency, two metrics for species abundance and dominance. We used 25 observed prairie sites and 853 observations of 267 transects spread throughout Minnesota, USA from 2010 to 2019 to conduct our analysis. Here, we show that burning reduced the abundance of invasive cool-season grasses, leading to reduced abundance of invasive species as a whole. This reduction persisted over time for invasive cover but quickly waned for their frequency of occurrence. Additionally, and contrary to expectations that early growing season starts benefit invasive species, we found evidence that later growing season starts increased the abundance of some invasive species. However, the effects of burning on plant communities were largely unaltered by the timing of the growing season, although earlier growing season starts weakened the effectiveness of burning on Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) and smooth brome (Bromus inermis), two of the most dominant invasive species in the region. Our results suggest that prescribed burning will likely continue to be a useful conservation tool in the context of earlier growing season starts, and that changes to growing season timing will not be a primary mechanism driving increased invasion due to climate change in these ecosystems. We propose that future research seek to better understand abiotic controls on invasive species phenology in managed systems and how burning intensity and timing interact with spring conditions.
C1 [Ratcliffe, Hugh] Univ Minnesota, Dept Fisheries Wildlife & Conservat Biol, St Paul, MN 55108 USA.
   [Ahlering, Marissa] Nature Conservancy, Moorhead, MN USA.
   [Carlson, Daren] Minnesota Dept Nat Resources, St Paul, MN USA.
   [Vacek, Sara] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Morris, MN USA.
   [Allstadt, Andrew] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Bloomington, MN USA.
   [Dee, Laura E.] Univ Colorado, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Boulder, CO USA.
C3 University of Minnesota System; University of Minnesota Twin Cities;
   Minnesota Department of Natural Resources; United States Department of
   the Interior; US Fish & Wildlife Service; United States Department of
   the Interior; US Fish & Wildlife Service; University of Colorado System;
   University of Colorado Boulder
RP Ratcliffe, H (corresponding author), Univ Minnesota, Dept Fisheries Wildlife & Conservat Biol, St Paul, MN 55108 USA.
EM hugh.ratcliffe@gmail.com
RI Ratcliffe, Hugh/KPA-6272-2024
OI Ahlering, Marissa/0000-0002-3913-428X; Ratcliffe,
   Hugh/0000-0002-1667-0733; Vacek, Sara/0000-0001-6585-6393; Allstadt,
   Andrew/0000-0003-3915-0834; Dee, Laura/0000-0003-0471-1371
FU Cox Family Fund; Nature Conservancy; US Fish and Wildlife Service;
   Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
FX Cox Family Fund; The Nature Conservancy; US Fish and Wildlife Service;
   Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
CR Ahlering M, 2020, ECOSPHERE, V11, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.3095
   Allison P.D., 2019, Socius, V5, p2378023119826441, DOI [DOI 10.1177/2378023119826441, 10.1177/2378023119826441]
   Allstadt AJ, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/104008
   ANDERSON HG, 1980, CAN J BOT, V58, P985, DOI 10.1139/b80-121
   ANDERSON R C, 1970, Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science, V63, P214
   Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
   [Anonymous], P 9 N AM PRAIR C PRA
   [Anonymous], 2019, Quality & Quantity:International Journal of Methodology, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S11135-018-0802-X, 10.1007/s11135-018-0802-x]
   [Anonymous], 1998, 17301 BLM US DEP INT
   Arnold TW, 2010, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V74, P1175, DOI 10.2193/2009-367
   Athey S, 2017, J ECON PERSPECT, V31, P3, DOI 10.1257/jep.31.2.3
   Behnke R, 2016, ECOL APPL, V26, P1338, DOI 10.1002/15-1061
   Bennett J, 2019, RESTOR ECOL, V27, P745, DOI 10.1111/rec.12932
   Blumenthal D, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V179, P440, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02475.x
   Bolker BM, 2009, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V24, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
   Bronaugh D., 2020, PACKAGE CLIMDEX PCIC
   Byun K, 2018, INT J CLIMATOL, V38, pE531, DOI 10.1002/joc.5388
   Cameron AC, 2015, J HUM RESOUR, V50, P317, DOI 10.3368/jhr.50.2.317
   Caswell Hal, 2001, pi
   Catford JA, 2019, ECOL REV, P149
   Coulloudon B., 1999, Sampling vegetation attributes, P1734
   Craine JM, 2011, OECOLOGIA, V165, P1109, DOI 10.1007/s00442-011-1938-8
   Cully AC, 2003, CONSERV BIOL, V17, P990, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02107.x
   D'Antonio C.M., 2000, Invasive Species in a Changing World, P65
   Daehler CC, 2003, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V34, P183, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132403
   Dee LE, 2016, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V283, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2016.1435
   DeKeyser ES, 2015, INVAS PLANT SCI MANA, V8, P255, DOI 10.1614/IPSM-D-14-00069.1
   DeKeyser ES, 2013, NAT AREA J, V33, P81, DOI 10.3375/043.033.0110
   DeKeyser S., 2009, RANGELANDS, V31, P16, DOI [DOI 10.2111/1551-501X-31.6.16, 10.2111/1551-501X-31.6.16]
   DiAllesandro A., 2013, Ecological Restoration, V31, P186, DOI 10.3368/er.31.2.186
   Dickson TL, 2012, BIOL INVASIONS, V14, P2617, DOI 10.1007/s10530-012-0257-2
   Dimitrakopoulos PG, 2006, ENVIRON MANAGE, V37, P826, DOI 10.1007/s00267-004-0179-6
   DiTomaso JM, 2006, WEED TECHNOL, V20, P535, DOI 10.1614/WT-05-086R1.1
   Dudney J, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-25182-6
   Dunnell KL, 2011, AM J BOT, V98, P935, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1000363
   Elton C., 1958
   ENGLE DM, 1984, J RANGE MANAGE, V37, P398, DOI 10.2307/3899623
   Felton AJ, 2017, PHILOS T R SOC B, V372, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2016.0142
   Ferraro PJ, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P5311, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1805563115
   Ferraro PJ, 2017, J ASSOC ENVIRON RESO, V4, P281, DOI 10.1086/689868
   Fuhlendorf S.D., 2011, Conservation Benefits of Rangeland Practices: Assessment, Recommendations, and Knowledge Gaps, P75
   Gaertner M, 2014, DIVERS DISTRIB, V20, P733, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12182
   Galatowitsch S, 2009, BIOL CONSERV, V142, P2012, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.03.030
   Gaure S., 2011, PACKAGE LFE
   Godoy O, 2009, PLANT BIOLOGY, V11, P803, DOI 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00185.x
   Gossner MM, 2016, NATURE, V540, P266, DOI 10.1038/nature20575
   Grace J.B., 2001, P INVASIVE SPECIES W, P40
   Grant T. A., 2004, Ecological Restoration, V22, P106, DOI 10.3368/er.22.2.106
   Grant T. A., 2009, Ecological Restoration, V27, P58, DOI 10.3368/er.27.1.58
   Greenstone M, 2009, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V57, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2008.02.004
   Halmer P, 2004, HANDBOOK OF SEED PHYSIOLOGY: APPLICATIONS TO AGRICULTURE, P125
   Havill S, 2015, APPL VEG SCI, V18, P637, DOI 10.1111/avsc.12171
   Hector A, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P1123, DOI 10.1126/science.286.5442.1123
   Hejda M, 2009, J ECOL, V97, P393, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01480.x
   Herkert JR, 2003, CONSERV BIOL, V17, P587, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01418.x
   Hess MCM, 2019, ECOL ENG, V127, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.11.011
   Higgins KennethF., 1989, EFFECTS FIRE NO GREA
   HOBBS RJ, 1992, CONSERV BIOL, V6, P324, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06030324.x
   Jeschke JM, 2014, DIVERS DISTRIB, V20, P1229, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12258
   KNAPP AK, 1986, BIOSCIENCE, V36, P662, DOI 10.2307/1310387
   Knops JMH, 2006, OECOLOGIA, V150, P477, DOI 10.1007/s00442-006-0535-8
   Komatsu KJ, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P17867, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1819027116
   Kreyling J, 2008, OIKOS, V117, P1542, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16653.x
   Kreyling J, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-51221-w
   Kreyling J, 2010, ECOLOGY, V91, P1939, DOI 10.1890/09-1160.1
   Larsen AE, 2019, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V10, P924, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.13190
   Larsen AE, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P5473, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1620674114
   Leach MK, 1996, SCIENCE, V273, P1555, DOI 10.1126/science.273.5281.1555
   Li Meng, 2014, Open Journal of Ecology, V4, P214
   Lian X, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aax0255
   MacDougall AS, 2013, NATURE, V494, P86, DOI 10.1038/nature11869
   Martinuzzi S, 2019, ECOL APPL, V29, DOI 10.1002/eap.1904
   MASTERS RA, 1992, J RANGE MANAGE, V45, P291, DOI 10.2307/4002980
   McDonald TL, 2003, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V85, P277, DOI 10.1023/A:1023954311636
   Memmott J, 2007, ECOL LETT, V10, P710, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01061.x
   Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR), 2011, MINN REM NAT PRAIR C
   Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR), 2013, MINN DEP NAT RES PLA
   Minnesota Prairie Plan Working Group, 2018, MINN PRAIR CONS PLAN
   Morris WF, 2008, ECOLOGY, V89, P19, DOI 10.1890/07-0774.1
   Murphy RK, 2005, NAT AREA J, V25, P351
   Nielsen TF, 2019, ECOL LETT, V22, P1650, DOI 10.1111/ele.13361
   Normand S, 2009, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V18, P437, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00451.x
   Peratoner Giovanni, 2019, Bodenkultur: Journal of Land Management, Food and Environment, V70, P1, DOI 10.2478/boku-2019-0001
   Petrie MD, 2012, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V107, P427, DOI 10.1007/s00704-011-0484-y
   Phillips-Mao L, 2016, BIOL CONSERV, V193, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.010
   Preister L, 2019, NAT AREA J, V39, P364, DOI 10.3375/043.039.0308
   Ratajczak Z, 2019, ECOL REV, P98
   Reig-Gracia F., 2019, CLIMIND CLIMATE INDI
   Rice P.M., 2005, FIRE TOOL CONTROLLIN
   Rice PeterM., 2008, WILDLAND FIRE ECOSYS, V6, P47
   Rowe HI, 2010, RESTOR ECOL, V18, P253, DOI 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00663.x
   SAMSON F, 1994, BIOSCIENCE, V44, P418, DOI 10.2307/1312365
   Samson FB, 2004, WILDLIFE SOC B, V32, P6, DOI 10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[6:GPEPPA]2.0.CO;2
   Sauer C.O., 1950, J RANGE MANAGE, V3, P16, DOI DOI 10.2307/3894702
   Sherry RA, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P198, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0605642104
   Thorpe J., 2011, 128552E11 SASK RES C
   Towne EG, 2008, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V61, P509, DOI 10.2111/08-043.1
   Turner CL, 1996, ECOLOGY, V77, P1738, DOI 10.2307/2265779
   U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service [USDA FS], NAT FOR SYST CLIM CH
   Vacek S., 2016, GRASSLAND MONITORING
   Vilà M, 2011, ECOL LETT, V14, P702, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x
   Wainwright CE, 2012, J APPL ECOL, V49, P234, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02088.x
   Whittington HR, 2015, ECOSPHERE, V6, DOI 10.1890/ES15-00070.1
   Willis CG, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008878
   Willson G.D., 2000, Ecological Restoration, V18, P34, DOI [10.3368/er.18.1.34, DOI 10.3368/ER.18.1.34]
   Wilsey BJ, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V205, P928, DOI 10.1111/nph.13028
   Wolkovich EM, 2014, AOB PLANTS, V6, DOI 10.1093/aobpla/plu013
   Wolkovich EM, 2013, AM J BOT, V100, P1407, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1200478
   Wooldridge J. M., 2015, Cengage learning
   Wooldridge JM, 2010, ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF CROSS SECTION AND PANEL DATA, 2ND EDITION, P3
   Wright CK, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P4134, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1215404110
   Wuebbles D. J., 2017, Climate science special report: Fourth national climate assessment, VI
   Zettlemoyer MA, 2019, ECOL LETT, V22, P1253, DOI 10.1111/ele.13290
NR 113
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 3
U2 21
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1051-0761
EI 1939-5582
J9 ECOL APPL
JI Ecol. Appl.
PD OCT
PY 2022
VL 32
IS 7
AR e2641
DI 10.1002/eap.2641
EA JUN 2022
PG 18
WC Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 5B5QM
UT WOS:000810337400001
PM 35441427
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Yu, L
   Gu, FX
   Huang, M
   Tao, B
   Hao, M
   Wang, ZS
AF Yu, Li
   Gu, Fengxue
   Huang, Mei
   Tao, Bo
   Hao, Man
   Wang, Zhaosheng
TI Impacts of 1.5 °C and 2 °C Global Warming on Net Primary Productivity
   and Carbon Balance in China's Terrestrial Ecosystems
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C global warming; climate risks; earth
   system models of CIMP5; process-based ecosystem model; China
ID EARTH SYSTEM MODEL; LAND-COVER CHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FUTURE CLIMATE;
   TEMPERATURE; RESPONSES; FOREST; PRECIPITATION; DYNAMICS; CYCLE
AB Assessing potential impacts of 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C global warming and identifying the risks of further 0.5 degrees C warming are crucial for climate adaptation and disaster risk management. Four earth system models in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) and a process-based ecosystem model are used in this study to assess the impacts and potential risks of the two warming targets on the carbon cycle of China's terrestrial ecosystems. Results show that warming generally stimulates the increase of net primary productivity (NPP) and net ecosystem productivity (NEP) under both representative concentration pathway (RCP) 4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios. The projected increments of NPP are higher at 2 degrees C warming than that at 1.5 degrees C warming for both RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios; approximately 13% and 19% under RCP4.5, and 12.5% and 20% under RCP8.5 at 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C warming, respectively. However, the increasing rate of NPP was projected to decline at 2 degrees C warming under the RCP4.5 scenario, and the further 0.5 degrees C temperature rising induces the decreased NPP linear slopes in more than 81% areas of China's ecosystems. The total NEP is projected to be increased by 53% at 1.5 degrees C, and by 81% at 2 degrees C warming. NEP was projected to increase approximately by 28% with the additional 0.5 degrees C warming. Furthermore, the increasing rate of NEP weakens at 2 degrees C warming, especially under the RCP8.5 scenario. In summary, China's total NPP and NEP were projected to increase under both 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C warming scenarios, although adverse effects (i.e., the drop of NPP growth and the reduction of carbon sequestration capacity) would occur in some regions such as northern China in the process of global warming.
C1 [Yu, Li] China Meteorol Adm, Natl Climate Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
   [Gu, Fengxue] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Environm & Sustainable Dev Agr, Minist Agr, Key Lab Dryland Agr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
   [Huang, Mei; Hao, Man; Wang, Zhaosheng] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
   [Tao, Bo] Univ Kentucky, Coll Agr Food & Environm, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Lexington, KY 40546 USA.
C3 China Meteorological Administration; Chinese Academy of Agricultural
   Sciences; Institute of Environment & Sustainable Development in
   Agriculture, CAAS; Ministry of Agriculture & Rural Affairs; Chinese
   Academy of Sciences; Institute of Geographic Sciences & Natural
   Resources Research, CAS; University of Kentucky
RP Huang, M (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
EM yuli@cma.gov.cn; gufengxue@caas.cn; huangm@igsnrr.ac.cn;
   taobo.eco@gmail.com; haom.l4s@igsnrr.ac.cn; wangzs@igsnrr.ac.cn
RI TAO, BO/I-4166-2014; Wang, Zhaosheng/AAX-1350-2021
OI Wang, Zhaosheng/0000-0001-7307-2249
FU National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0503905]; National Natural
   Science Foundation of China [41991285]; Central Public-interest
   Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund [BSRF201708]
FX This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China, grant
   number 2017YFC0503905, National Natural Science Foundation of China,
   grant number 41991285 and Central Public-interest Scientific Institution
   Basal Research Fund, grant number BSRF201708.
CR Ahlström A, 2012, ENVIRON RES LETT, V7, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044008
   [Anonymous], THE PARIS AGREEMENT
   Bispo A, 2017, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V5, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00041
   Cai TEB, 2010, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V33, P394, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02089.x
   Cao MK, 1998, NATURE, V393, P249, DOI 10.1038/30460
   Cao MK, 2003, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V9, P536, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00617.x
   Chen C, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P122, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0220-7
   Chen N., 2019, ATMOS OCEAN SCI LETT
   Ciais P, 2005, NATURE, V437, P529, DOI 10.1038/nature03972
   Ciais P, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P465
   Dufresne JL, 2013, CLIM DYNAM, V40, P2123, DOI 10.1007/s00382-012-1636-1
   Ellsworth DS, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P279, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3235, 10.1038/nclimate3235]
   Feddema JJ, 2005, SCIENCE, V310, P1674, DOI 10.1126/science.1118160
   Field C.B., 2014, WORKING GROUP 2 CONT, P1, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781107415379, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415379]
   Flanagan LB, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2271, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02378.x
   Friend AD, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3280, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1222477110
   Fu YC, 2013, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V5, P4125, DOI 10.3390/rs5084125
   Gang CC, 2015, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V74, P5949, DOI 10.1007/s12665-015-4618-x
   Gao Q, 1998, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V12, P329, DOI 10.1029/97GB03659
   Giorgetta MA, 2013, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V5, P572, DOI 10.1002/jame.20038
   Gu FX, 2017, ECOL EVOL, V7, P6736, DOI 10.1002/ece3.3029
   Gu FX, 2017, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V246, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.06.011
   Hadden D, 2016, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V223, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.03.020
   Headache classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS), 2018, Cephalalgia, V38, P1, DOI [10.1177/0333102417738202, DOI 10.1177/0333102417738202, DOI 10.2833/9937]
   Heimann M, 2008, NATURE, V451, P289, DOI 10.1038/nature06591
   Hibbard K.A., 2017, Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, VI, P277, DOI 10.7930/J0416V6X
   Hoegh-Guldberg O., 2018, Global Warming of 1.5C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5C above pre-industrial levels and related, P138
   Huang MT, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P2366, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12873
   Hutchinson M. F., 1989, Technical Memorandum - Division of Water Resources, Institute of Natural Resources and Environment, CSIRO, P95
   Institute of Soil Science, 1986, SOIL ATL CHIN
   Jackson E., 2016, LMITS AUSTR 1 5 2 C
   Ji D., 2014, Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, V7, P1601, DOI 10.5194/gmd-7-2039-2014
   Ji JJ, 2008, SCI CHINA SER D, V51, P885, DOI 10.1007/s11430-008-0039-y
   Jiang C, 2015, INT J PLANT PROD, V9, P581
   Jiang DB, 2016, INT J CLIMATOL, V36, P4512, DOI 10.1002/joc.4647
   Jones CD, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095012
   Ju WM, 2007, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V85, P538, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.04.028
   Li J, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V639, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.155
   Li YE, 2018, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V23, P603, DOI 10.1007/s11027-017-9751-2
   Liang W, 2015, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V204, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.01.015
   Liu JY, 2014, J GEOGR SCI, V24, P195, DOI 10.1007/s11442-014-1082-6
   Murray-Tortarolo G, 2016, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V13, P223, DOI 10.5194/bg-13-223-2016
   Nemani RR, 2003, SCIENCE, V300, P1560, DOI 10.1126/science.1082750
   Nordhaus M.D., 1977, COWLES FDN DISCUSSIO, V443
   Oleson KW, 2010, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V37, DOI 10.1029/2009GL042194
   PCMDI, 2013, COUPL MOD INT PROJ P
   Piao SL, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P359, DOI [10.1038/nclimate3277, 10.1038/NCLIMATE3277]
   Piao SL, 2011, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V75, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.10.014
   Ren W, 2011, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V20, P391, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00606.x
   Sakalli Abdulla, 2017, Climate Services, V7, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2017.03.006
   Schimel D, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P436, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1407302112
   Schleussner CF, 2016, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V7, P327, DOI 10.5194/esd-7-327-2016
   Seidl R, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P395, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3303, 10.1038/nclimate3303]
   Shao P, 2013, J CLIMATE, V26, P8744, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00831.1
   Shi C, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2017.11.003
   [施雅风 Shi Yafeng], 2003, [第四纪研究, Quaternary Sciences], V23, P152
   Su BD, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V141, P533, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1852-5
   Tao B, 2007, SCI CHINA SER D, V50, P745, DOI 10.1007/s11430-007-0022-z
   The Preparing Committee for the Third National Climate Change Assessment Report, 2015, 3 NAT ASS REP CLIM C, P13
   Tjiputra JF, 2013, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V6, P301, DOI 10.5194/gmd-6-301-2013
   Turner DP, 2011, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V262, P1318, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.034
   van Vuuren DP, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P95, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0152-3
   Wang YJ, 2017, ADV ATMOS SCI, V34, P289, DOI 10.1007/s00376-016-6160-5
   Wang ZQ, 2019, J PLANT ECOL, V12, P804, DOI 10.1093/jpe/rtz024
   White A, 1999, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V9, pS21, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(99)00016-3
   Wu S., 2019, EARTHS FUTURE, P7
   Wu ZT, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P927, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02302.x
   Zhai P., 2017, CLIMATE CHANGE RES, V13, P465
   Zhang YX, 2015, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V121, P157, DOI 10.1007/s00704-014-1213-0
   [张远东 Zhang Yuandong], 2016, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V36, P1515
   Zhao DS, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0060849
   Zhou BT, 2014, J CLIMATE, V27, P6591, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00761.1
   [朱再春 Zhu Zaichun], 2018, [气候变化研究进展, Progressus Inquisitiones de Mutatione Climatis], V14, P31
NR 73
TC 14
Z9 21
U1 8
U2 73
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD APR
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 7
AR 2849
DI 10.3390/su12072849
PG 17
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA LL4WR
UT WOS:000531558100274
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Ogier, E
   Jennings, S
   Fowler, A
   Frusher, S
   Gardner, C
   Hamer, P
   Hobday, AJ
   Linanne, A
   Mayfield, S
   Mundy, C
   Sullivan, A
   Tuck, G
   Ward, T
   Pecl, G
AF Ogier, Emily
   Jennings, Sarah
   Fowler, Anthony
   Frusher, Stewart
   Gardner, Caleb
   Hamer, Paul
   Hobday, Alistair J.
   Linanne, Adrian
   Mayfield, Stephan
   Mundy, Craig
   Sullivan, Andrew
   Tuck, Geoff
   Ward, Tim
   Pecl, Gretta
TI Responding to Climate Change: Participatory Evaluation of Adaptation
   Options for Key Marine Fisheries in Australia's South East
SO FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptation options; climate change; commercial fisheries; evaluation;
   participation
ID TRANSFORMATIONAL ADAPTATION; FISHING COMMUNITIES; MANAGEMENT;
   RESILIENCE; IMPACTS; VULNERABILITY; ENVIRONMENTS; BIODIVERSITY;
   STRATEGIES; FRAMEWORK
AB Planned adaptation to climate impacts and subsequent vulnerabilities will necessarily interact with autonomous responses enabled within existing fisheries management processes and initiated by the harvest and post-harvest components of fishing industries. Optimal adaptation options are those which enable negative effects to be mitigated and opportunities that arise to be maximized, both in relation to specific climate-driven changes and the broader fisheries system. We developed a two-step participatory approach to evaluating adaption options for key fisheries in the fast-warming hotspot of south-eastern Australia. Four fisheries (southern rock lobster, abalone, snapper, and blue grenadier) were selected as case studies on the basis of their high to moderate vulnerability to climatic effects on species distribution and abundance. Involved stakeholders undertook a "first pass" screening assessment of options, by characterizing and then evaluating options. In the characterization step potential adaptation options for each fishery, contextualized by prior knowledge of each species' climate change exposure and sensitivity, were described using a characterization matrix. This matrix included: the specific climate vulnerability/challenges, the implications of each option on the fishery system as a whole, the temporal and spatial scales of implementation processes, and realized benefits and costs. In the evaluation step, semi-quantitative evaluation of options was undertaken by stakeholders scoring the anticipated performance of an option against a pre-determined set of criteria relating to perceived feasibility, risk (inclusive of potential costs), and benefit. Reduction of the total annual commercial catch as well as reductions in both effort and catch through spatial and temporal closures were the options scored as having the highest level of expected benefit and of feasibility and the lowest level of risk of negative outcomes overall. Our screening assessment represents a pragmatic approach to evaluate and compare support for and the effects of alternative adaptation options prior to committing to more detailed formal and resource intensive evaluation or implementation.
C1 [Ogier, Emily; Frusher, Stewart; Gardner, Caleb; Mundy, Craig; Pecl, Gretta] Univ Tasmania, Inst Marine & Antarctic Studies, Hobart, Tas, Australia.
   [Ogier, Emily; Jennings, Sarah; Frusher, Stewart; Hobday, Alistair J.; Pecl, Gretta] Ctr Marine Socioecol, Hobart, Tas, Australia.
   [Jennings, Sarah] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Sch Business & Econ, Hobart, Tas, Australia.
   [Fowler, Anthony; Linanne, Adrian; Mayfield, Stephan; Ward, Tim] South Australian Res & Dev Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
   [Hamer, Paul] Victorian Fisheries Author, Queenscliff, Vic, Australia.
   [Hobday, Alistair J.; Tuck, Geoff] CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, Hobart, Tas, Australia.
   [Sullivan, Andrew] Fish Focus Consulting, Hobart, Tas, Australia.
C3 University of Tasmania; University of Tasmania; South Australian
   Research & Development Institute (SARDI); Commonwealth Scientific &
   Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO); CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere
RP Ogier, E (corresponding author), Univ Tasmania, Inst Marine & Antarctic Studies, Hobart, Tas, Australia.; Ogier, E (corresponding author), Ctr Marine Socioecol, Hobart, Tas, Australia.
EM Emily.Ogier@utas.edu.au
RI WARD, Timothy/KDN-7596-2024; Hobday, Alistair/A-1460-2012; Jennings,
   Sarah/J-7888-2014; Pecl, Gretta/D-7267-2011; Mundy, Craig/G-3390-2014
OI Pecl, Gretta/0000-0003-0192-4339; Ward, Timothy
   Mark/0000-0002-9003-2772; Mundy, Craig/0000-0002-1945-3750; Ogier,
   Emily/0000-0001-6157-5279
FU Fisheries Research and Development Organization (FRDC) on behalf of the
   Australian Government [2011/039]; ARC Future Fellowship
FX This study was undertaken as part of a research project funded by the
   Fisheries Research and Development Organization (FRDC) on behalf of the
   Australian Government (grant number 2011/039). The members of the wider
   project team are thanked for their support. They are as follows: Felipe
   Briceno, Klaas Hartmann, Jason Hartog, Eriko Hoshino, Bastien Le
   Bouhellec, Martin Marzloff, Sally Wayte. GP was supported by an ARC
   Future Fellowship.
CR Adger WN, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P77, DOI [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.03.001, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005]
   Aguilera SE, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0118992
   [Anonymous], 2010, FRAMEWORK SOCIAL ADA
   [Anonymous], 2016, PLOS ONE, DOI DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0145285
   [Anonymous], 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.003
   BEEBE J, 1995, HUM ORGAN, V54, P42, DOI 10.17730/humo.54.1.k84tv883mr2756l3
   BERK RA, 1983, AM SOCIOL REV, V48, P386, DOI 10.2307/2095230
   Berkes F, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V90, P1692, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001
   Blair AAC, 2018, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V157, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.02.015
   Bradley R, 2015, PHILOS COMPASS, V10, P799, DOI 10.1111/phc3.12259
   Brugere C., 2015, 597 FAO FAO FISH AQ
   Caputi N, 2016, ECOL EVOL, V6, P3583, DOI 10.1002/ece3.2137
   Castillo-Jordán C, 2019, FISH RES, V212, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2018.12.019
   Champion C, 2019, MAR FRESHWATER RES, V70, P33, DOI 10.1071/MF17387
   Cheung WWL, 2010, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V16, P24, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01995.x
   Cheung WWL, 2009, FISH FISH, V10, P235, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00315.x
   Choy LT., 2014, IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, V19, P99
   Colman AM, 1997, PSYCHOL REP, V80, P355, DOI 10.2466/pr0.1997.80.2.355
   Creighton C, 2016, ECOSYSTEMS, V19, P187, DOI 10.1007/s10021-015-9925-2
   Dulvy NK, 2008, J APPL ECOL, V45, P1029, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01488.x
   Dutra LXC, 2019, MAR POLICY, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.12.011
   Fankhauser S, 1999, ECOL ECON, V30, P67, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00117-7
   Fleming A, 2014, CLIM RISK MANAG, V1, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2013.12.003
   Frusher SD, 2014, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V24, P593, DOI 10.1007/s11160-013-9325-7
   Grafton RQ, 2010, MAR POLICY, V34, P606, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.11.011
   Grüneis H, 2016, SPRINGERPLUS, V5, DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-3542-1
   Gutiérrez AT, 2017, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V135, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.10.016
   Haasnoot M, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P485, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006
   Hiddink JG, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P117, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12726
   Hobday AJ, 2011, FISH RES, V108, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2011.01.013
   Hobday AJ, 2016, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V26, P249, DOI 10.1007/s11160-016-9419-0
   Hobday AJ, 2014, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V24, P415, DOI 10.1007/s11160-013-9326-6
   Jennings S, 2016, FISH OCEANOGR, V25, P29, DOI 10.1111/fog.12137
   Kates RW, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P7156, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1115521109
   Koehn JD, 2011, MAR FRESHWATER RES, V62, P1148, DOI 10.1071/MF11139
   Le Bris A, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P1831, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1711122115
   Lebel L, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Lehuta S, 2016, AQUAT LIVING RESOUR, V29, DOI 10.1051/alr/2016022
   Leith P, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P55, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0984-0
   Lemieux CJ, 2011, ENVIRON MANAGE, V48, P675, DOI 10.1007/s00267-011-9700-x
   Lindegren M, 2018, REV FISH SCI AQUAC, V26, P400, DOI 10.1080/23308249.2018.1445980
   Michael PE, 2017, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V140, P242, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.12.003
   Miles M. B., 2014, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, V4th
   Miller DD, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, pE1, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13829
   Miller K, 2010, PROG OCEANOGR, V87, P338, DOI 10.1016/j.pocean.2010.09.014
   Moser SC, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P22026, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1007887107
   Mushtaq S, 2018, CLIM RISK MANAG, V19, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2017.12.001
   Nelson DR, 2007, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V32, P395, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
   Nursey-Bray M, 2012, MAR POLICY, V36, P753, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.10.015
   Ogier EM, 2016, MAR POLICY, V71, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.05.014
   Ojea E, 2017, AMBIO, V46, P399, DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0850-1
   [Parry M. IPCC. IPCC.], 2007, 4 ASSESSMENT REPORT
   Pecl G. T., 2014, 2011039 FISH RES DEV, P278
   Pecl GT, 2019, AMBIO, V48, P1498, DOI 10.1007/s13280-019-01186-x
   Pecl GT, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V127, P505, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1284-z
   Pecl GT, 2014, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V24, P409, DOI 10.1007/s11160-014-9355-9
   Plagányi ÉE, 2011, ICES J MAR SCI, V68, P1305, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsr049
   Pratchett MS, 2017, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V27, P297, DOI 10.1007/s11160-016-9455-9
   Prober SM, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V110, P227, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0092-y
   Selim SA, 2016, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V16, P341, DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0635-7
   Senapati S, 2017, MAR POLICY, V76, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.11.023
   Smith MS, 2011, PHILOS T R SOC A, V369, P196, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2010.0277
   Sova CA, 2015, SYST PRACT ACT RES, V28, P383, DOI 10.1007/s11213-014-9335-y
   Stoeckl N., 2017, CLIMATE CHANGE IMPAC
   Stöhr C, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06638-190314
   Szuwalski CS, 2016, ICES J MAR SCI, V73, P1297, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsv229
   Tompkins EL, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.010
   van Putten IE, 2016, ICES J MAR SCI, V73, P1306, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsv192
   Wise RM, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002
   Young T, 2019, ICES J MAR SCI, V76, P93, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsy140
NR 70
TC 13
Z9 14
U1 2
U2 24
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-7745
J9 FRONT MAR SCI
JI Front. Mar. Sci.
PD MAR 6
PY 2020
VL 7
AR 97
DI 10.3389/fmars.2020.00097
PG 22
WC Environmental Sciences; Marine & Freshwater Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Marine & Freshwater Biology
GA KS9LY
UT WOS:000518631800001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Price, N
   Lopez, L
   Platts, AE
   Lasky, JR
AF Price, Nicholas
   Lopez, Lua
   Platts, Adrian E.
   Lasky, Jesse R.
TI In the presence of population structure: From genomics to candidate
   genes underlying local adaptation
SO ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
LA English
DT Article
DE flowering time; population genomics; population structure; quantitative
   trait loci; selective constraint
ID FLOWERING-TIME QTL; ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM;
   FREEZING TOLERANCE; NATURAL VARIATION; ABSCISIC-ACID; MIXED-MODEL;
   ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE; DETECTING SELECTION; EVOLUTION
AB Understanding the genomic signatures, genes, and traits underlying local adaptation of organisms to heterogeneous environments is of central importance to the field evolutionary biology. To identify loci underlying local adaptation, models that combine allelic and environmental variation while controlling for the effects of population structure have emerged as the method of choice. Despite being evaluated in simulation studies, there has not been a thorough investigation of empirical evidence supporting local adaptation across these alleles. To evaluate these methods, we use 875 Arabidopsis thaliana Eurasian accessions and two mixed models (GEMMA and LFMM) to identify candidate SNPs underlying local adaptation to climate. Subsequently, to assess evidence of local adaptation and function among significant SNPs, we examine allele frequency differentiation and recent selection across Eurasian populations, in addition to their distribution along quantitative trait loci (QTL) explaining fitness variation between Italy and Sweden populations and cis-regulatory/nonsynonymous sites showing significant selective constraint. Our results indicate that significant LFMM/GEMMA SNPs show low allele frequency differentiation and linkage disequilibrium across locally adapted Italy and Sweden populations, in addition to a poor association with fitness QTL peaks (highest logarithm of odds score). Furthermore, when examining derived allele frequencies across the Eurasian range, we find that these SNPs are enriched in low-frequency variants that show very large climatic differentiation but low levels of linkage disequilibrium. These results suggest that their enrichment along putative functional sites most likely represents deleterious variation that is independent of local adaptation. Among all the genomic signatures examined, only SNPs showing high absolute allele frequency differentiation (AFD) and linkage disequilibrium (LD) between Italy and Sweden populations showed a strong association with fitness QTL peaks and were enriched along selectively constrained cis-regulatory/nonsynonymous sites. Using these SNPs, we find strong evidence linking flowering time, freezing tolerance, and the abscisic-acid pathway to local adaptation.
C1 [Price, Nicholas] Colorado State Univ, Dept Bioagr Sci & Pest Management, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA.
   [Price, Nicholas] Univ Cyprus, Dept Biol Sci, Nicosia, Cyprus.
   [Lopez, Lua] SUNY Binghamton, Dept Biol, Binghamton, NY USA.
   [Platts, Adrian E.] Cold Spring Harbor Lab, Simons Ctr Quantitat Biol, POB 100, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724 USA.
   [Platts, Adrian E.] NYU, Dept Biol, Ctr Genom & Syst Biol, New York, NY 10003 USA.
   [Lasky, Jesse R.] Penn State Univ, Dept Biol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA.
C3 Colorado State University; University of Cyprus; State University of New
   York (SUNY) System; Binghamton University, SUNY; Cold Spring Harbor
   Laboratory; New York University; Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of
   Higher Education (PCSHE); Pennsylvania State University; Pennsylvania
   State University - University Park
RP Price, N (corresponding author), Colorado State Univ, Dept Bioagr Sci & Pest Management, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA.
EM price4890@gmail.com
RI Platts, Adrian/H-5633-2013; Lopez, Lua/A-9710-2016
OI Platts, Adrian/0000-0001-9238-9647; Lopez, Lua/0000-0002-3619-763X;
   Price, Nicholas/0000-0001-6672-2952
CR Ågren J, 2017, EVOLUTION, V71, P550, DOI 10.1111/evo.13126
   Ågren J, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P21077, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1316773110
   Ågren J, 2012, NEW PHYTOL, V194, P1112, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04112.x
   Alonso-Blanco C, 2016, CELL, V166, P481, DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.063
   Anderson JT, 2013, MOL ECOL, V22, P699, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05522.x
   Anderson JT, 2011, TRENDS GENET, V27, P258, DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2011.04.001
   [Anonymous], 2016, Molecular and Genome Evolution
   Arguello JR, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms11855
   BARTON N, 1986, HEREDITY, V57, P357, DOI 10.1038/hdy.1986.135
   Beaumont MA, 2004, MOL ECOL, V13, P969, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02125.x
   Berardini TZ, 2015, GENESIS, V53, P474, DOI 10.1002/dvg.22877
   Bergelson J, 2010, NAT REV GENET, V11, P867, DOI 10.1038/nrg2896
   BERNER D, 2019, GENES BASEL, V10
   Bhandari J, 2010, PLANT PHYSIOL, V154, P1116, DOI 10.1104/pp.110.157784
   Bierne N, 2011, MOL ECOL, V20, P2044, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05080.x
   Bonhomme M, 2010, GENETICS, V186, P241, DOI 10.1534/genetics.104.117275
   Briskine RV, 2017, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V17, P1025, DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12604
   Caicedo AL, 2009, MOL BIOL EVOL, V26, P699, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msn300
   Caye K, 2019, MOL BIOL EVOL, V36, P852, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msz008
   CHARLESWORTH B, 1993, GENETICS, V134, P1289
   Charlesworth D, 2006, PLOS GENET, V2, P379, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020064
   Colosimo PF, 2004, PLOS BIOL, V2, P635, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020109
   Conover DO, 2009, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1168, P100, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04575.x
   De Mita S, 2013, MOL ECOL, V22, P1383, DOI 10.1111/mec.12182
   de Villemereuil P, 2015, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V6, P1248, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12418
   de Villemereuil P, 2014, MOL ECOL, V23, P2006, DOI 10.1111/mec.12705
   DeGiorgio M, 2016, BIOINFORMATICS, V32, P1895, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw051
   Dittmar EL, 2014, MOL ECOL, V23, P4291, DOI 10.1111/mec.12857
   Dong J, 2017, CURR BIOL, V27, P2420, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.062
   Fischer MC, 2013, MOL ECOL, V22, P5594, DOI 10.1111/mec.12521
   Flowers JM, 2009, MOL BIOL EVOL, V26, P2475, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msp161
   Foll M, 2008, GENETICS, V180, P977, DOI 10.1534/genetics.108.092221
   Forester BR, 2018, MOL ECOL, V27, P2215, DOI 10.1111/mec.14584
   Fournier-Level A, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P86, DOI 10.1126/science.1209271
   Frachon L, 2018, FRONT PLANT SCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00967
   Gehan MA, 2015, PLANT J, V84, P682, DOI 10.1111/tpj.13027
   Gienapp P, 2017, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V32, P897, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2017.09.004
   Gillespie JH, 2000, GENETICS, V155, P909
   Goodstein DM, 2012, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V40, pD1178, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkr944
   Günther T, 2013, GENETICS, V195, P205, DOI 10.1534/genetics.113.152462
   Hall MC, 2006, EVOLUTION, V60, P2466, DOI 10.1554/05-688.1
   Hancock AM, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P83, DOI 10.1126/science.1209244
   Hancock AM, 2011, PLOS GENET, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001375
   Harris R., 2007, Improved paiwase alignment of genomic DNA
   Hassidim M, 2009, PLANTA, V230, P481, DOI 10.1007/s00425-009-0958-7
   Haudry A, 2013, NAT GENET, V45, P891, DOI 10.1038/ng.2684
   Hendry AP, 2002, EVOLUTION, V56, P1199
   Henson J, 2012, PHARMACOGENOMICS, V13, P901, DOI [10.2217/PGS.12.72, 10.2217/pgs.12.72]
   Hereford J, 2009, AM NAT, V173, P579, DOI 10.1086/597611
   Hoban S, 2016, AM NAT, V188, P379, DOI 10.1086/688018
   Hofer T, 2009, ANN HUM GENET, V73, P95, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2008.00489.x
   Hu TT, 2011, NAT GENET, V43, P476, DOI 10.1038/ng.807
   Huber CD, 2016, MOL ECOL, V25, P142, DOI 10.1111/mec.13351
   Huber CD, 2014, MOL BIOL EVOL, V31, P3026, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msu247
   Hubisz MJ, 2011, BRIEF BIOINFORM, V12, P41, DOI 10.1093/bib/bbq072
   Hupalo D, 2013, MOL BIOL EVOL, V30, P1729, DOI 10.1093/molbev/mst082
   Ingvarsson PK, 2020, EVOL APPL, V13, P132, DOI 10.1111/eva.12792
   Jacobs GS, 2016, GENETICS, V203, P1807, DOI 10.1534/genetics.115.185900
   Jeong C, 2014, CURR OPIN GENET DEV, V29, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.gde.2014.06.011
   Jiang BC, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, pE6695, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1706226114
   Joosen RVL, 2009, CURR GENOMICS, V10, P540, DOI 10.2174/138920209789503914
   Kalladan R, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P11536, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1705884114
   Kang HM, 2008, GENETICS, V178, P1709, DOI 10.1534/genetics.107.080101
   Kang HM, 2010, NAT GENET, V42, P348, DOI 10.1038/ng.548
   Katoh K, 2008, BRIEF BIOINFORM, V9, P286, DOI 10.1093/bib/bbn013
   Kaufmann J, 2017, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V30, P938, DOI 10.1111/jeb.13057
   Kawecki TJ, 2004, ECOL LETT, V7, P1225, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00684.x
   Keller SR, 2012, MOL BIOL EVOL, V29, P3143, DOI 10.1093/molbev/mss121
   Kemppainen P, 2015, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V15, P1031, DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12369
   Kim Y, 2004, GENETICS, V167, P1513, DOI 10.1534/genetics.103.025387
   Kim Y, 2002, GENETICS, V160, P765
   Lachance J, 2013, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V44, P123, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135833
   Lasky JR, 2018, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V18, P91, DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12714
   Lasky JR, 2014, MOL BIOL EVOL, V31, P2283, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msu170
   Lasky JR, 2012, MOL ECOL, V21, P5512, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05709.x
   Leimu R, 2008, PLOS ONE, V3, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0004010
   Long Q, 2013, NAT GENET, V45, P884, DOI 10.1038/ng.2678
   Lotterhos KE, 2015, MOL ECOL, V24, P1031, DOI 10.1111/mec.13100
   Lotterhos KE, 2014, MOL ECOL, V23, P2178, DOI 10.1111/mec.12725
   Luu K, 2017, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V17, P67, DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12592
   Maddamsetti R, 2017, GENOME BIOL EVOL, V9, P1072, DOI 10.1093/gbe/evx064
   McKay JK, 2002, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V17, P285, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02478-3
   Miller W, 2007, GENOME RES, V17, P1797, DOI 10.1101/gr.6761107
   Mojica JP, 2016, PLANT SCI, V251, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.03.015
   Monroe JG, 2018, ELIFE, V7, DOI 10.7554/eLife.41038
   Monroe JG, 2016, MOL ECOL, V25, P3632, DOI 10.1111/mec.13711
   Monte E, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P16091, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0407107101
   Nielsen R, 2005, GENOME RES, V15, P1566, DOI 10.1101/gr.4252305
   Oakley CG, 2014, MOL ECOL, V23, P4304, DOI 10.1111/mec.12862
   Oda A, 2004, FEBS LETT, V557, P259, DOI 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)01470-4
   Pass DA, 2017, PLOS GENET, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006988
   Pennisi E, 2014, SCIENCE, V345, P611, DOI 10.1126/science.345.6197.611
   Pérez-Figueroa A, 2010, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V23, P2267, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02093.x
   Phifer-Rixey M, 2018, PLOS GENET, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007672
   Pisupati R, 2017, SCI DATA, V4, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2017.184
   Price AL, 2010, NAT REV GENET, V11, P459, DOI 10.1038/nrg2813
   Price N, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P5028, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1719998115
   Purcell S, 2007, AM J HUM GENET, V81, P559, DOI 10.1086/519795
   Rellstab C, 2017, HEREDITY, V118, P193, DOI 10.1038/hdy.2016.82
   Ristova D, 2018, PLANT J, V96, P468, DOI 10.1111/tpj.14034
   Sabeti PC, 2002, NATURE, V419, P832, DOI 10.1038/nature01140
   Sackton TB, 2019, SCIENCE, V364, P74, DOI 10.1126/science.aat7244
   Salomé PA, 2011, GENETICS, V188, P421, DOI 10.1534/genetics.111.126607
   Sandring S, 2009, EVOLUTION, V63, P1292, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00624.x
   Sasaki E, 2015, PLOS GENET, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005597
   Savolainen O, 2007, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V38, P595, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095646
   Savolainen O, 2013, NAT REV GENET, V14, P807, DOI 10.1038/nrg3522
   Siepel A, 2005, GENOME RES, V15, P1034, DOI 10.1101/gr.3715005
   Slotte T, 2013, NAT GENET, V45, P831, DOI 10.1038/ng.2669
   Sork VL, 2018, J HERED, V109, P3, DOI 10.1093/jhered/esx091
   Soy J, 2012, PLANT J, V71, P390, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04992.x
   Storey JD, 2002, J ROY STAT SOC B, V64, P479, DOI 10.1111/1467-9868.00346
   Tamura K, 2013, MOL BIOL EVOL, V30, P2725, DOI [10.1093/molbev/mst197, 10.1093/molbev/msr121]
   Tiffin P, 2014, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V29, P673, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.004
   Tuteja N, 2007, PLANT SIGNAL BEHAV, V2, P135, DOI 10.4161/psb.2.3.4156
   Verhoeven KJF, 2008, MOL ECOL, V17, P3416, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03847.x
   VIA S, 1991, EVOLUTION, V45, P827, DOI 10.2307/2409692
   Wadgymar SM, 2017, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V8, P738, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12777
   WANG J, 2018, GENOME BIOL, V19
   Wang L, 2011, BIOINFORMATICS, V27, P686, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq728
   YANG JL, 2016, SCI REP UK, V0006
   Yeaman S, 2011, EVOLUTION, V65, P1897, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01269.x
   Yoder JB, 2018, J HERED, V109, P16, DOI 10.1093/jhered/esx042
   Yu JM, 2006, NAT GENET, V38, P203, DOI 10.1038/ng1702
   Zhen Y, 2008, MOL BIOL EVOL, V25, P2547, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msn196
   Zhen Y, 2011, AM NAT, V178, P44, DOI 10.1086/660282
   Zhou X, 2012, NAT GENET, V44, P821, DOI 10.1038/ng.2310
   Zou C, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P14992, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1103202108
NR 128
TC 14
Z9 15
U1 3
U2 27
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 2045-7758
J9 ECOL EVOL
JI Ecol. Evol.
PD FEB
PY 2020
VL 10
IS 4
BP 1889
EP 1904
DI 10.1002/ece3.6002
EA FEB 2020
PG 16
WC Ecology; Evolutionary Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Evolutionary Biology
GA KO9WA
UT WOS:000512806300001
PM 32128123
OA Green Submitted, Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Dawkins, LC
   Brown, K
   Bernie, DJ
   Lowe, JA
   Economou, T
   Grassie, D
   Schwartz, Y
   Godoy-Shimizu, D
   Korolija, I
   Mumovic, D
   Wingate, D
   Dyer, E
AF Dawkins, Laura C.
   Brown, Kate
   Bernie, Dan J.
   Lowe, Jason A.
   Economou, Theodoros
   Grassie, Duncan
   Schwartz, Yair
   Godoy-Shimizu, Daniel
   Korolija, Ivan
   Mumovic, Dejan
   Wingate, David
   Dyer, Emma
TI Quantifying overheating risk in English schools: A spatially coherent
   climate risk assessment
SO CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate risk; Spatial risk assessment framework; Generalised additive
   modelling; Uncertainty quantification; Heat-stress; Overheating in
   buildings
ID IMPACTS; WEATHER; HEAT
AB Climate adaptation decision making can be informed by a quantification of current and future climate risk. This is important for understanding which populations and/or infrastructures are most at risk in order to prioritise adaptation action. When assessing the risk of overheating in buildings, many studies use advanced building models to comprehensively represent the vulnerability of the building to overheating, but often use a limited representation of the meteorological (hazard) information which does not vary realistically in space. An alternative approach for quantifying risk is to use a spatial risk assessment framework which combines information about hazard, exposure and vulnerability to estimate risk in a spatially consistent way, allowing for risk to be compared across different locations. Here we present a novel application of an open-source CLIMADA-based spatial risk assessment framework to an ensemble of climate projections to assess overheating risk in similar to 20,000 schools in England. In doing so, we demonstrate an approach for bringing together the advantages of open-source spatial risk assessment frameworks, data science techniques, and physics-based building models to assess climate risk in a spatially consistent way, allowing for the prioritisation of adaptation action in this vulnerable young population. Specifically, we assess the expected number of days each school overheats (internal operative temperature exceeds a high threshold) in a school-year based on three global warming levels (recent past, 2 degrees C and 4 degrees C warmer than pre-industrial). Our results indicate an increase in this risk in future warmer climates, with the relative frequency of overheating at internal temperatures in excess of 35 degrees C increasing more than at 26 degrees C. Indeed, this novel demonstration of the approach indicates that the most at-risk schools could experience up to 15 school days of internal temperature in excess of 35 degrees C in an average year if the climate warms to 2 degrees C above pre-industrial. Finally, we demonstrate how the spatial consistency in the output risk could enable the prioritisation of high risk schools for adaptation action.
C1 [Dawkins, Laura C.; Brown, Kate; Bernie, Dan J.; Lowe, Jason A.; Dyer, Emma] Met Off, FitzRoy Rd, Exeter EX1 3PB, Devon, England.
   [Bernie, Dan J.] Univ Bristol, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Bristol, England.
   [Lowe, Jason A.] Univ Leeds, Priestley Int Ctr Climate, Leeds, England.
   [Economou, Theodoros] Cyprus Inst, Climate & Atmosphere Res Ctr, Aglandjia, Cyprus.
   [Grassie, Duncan; Schwartz, Yair; Godoy-Shimizu, Daniel; Korolija, Ivan; Mumovic, Dejan] UCL, Inst Environm Design & Engn, London, England.
   [Wingate, David] Dept Educ, Great Smith St, London, England.
C3 Met Office - UK; University of Bristol; University of West England;
   University of Leeds; University of London; University College London
RP Dawkins, LC (corresponding author), Met Off, FitzRoy Rd, Exeter EX1 3PB, Devon, England.
EM laura.dawkins@metoffice.gov.uk
RI Grassie, Duncan/AAH-4432-2021; Korolija, Ivan/KIA-3955-2024
OI Godoy-Shimizu, Daniel/0000-0002-6765-9606; Korolija,
   Ivan/0000-0003-3153-6070; Mumovic, Dejan/0000-0002-4914-9004; Bernie,
   Dan/0000-0003-3522-8921; Schwartz, Yair/0000-0002-3526-2137
FU Strategic Priority Fund for UK Climate Resilience; UKRI Strategic
   Priorities Fund; European Union [856612]; Engineering and Physical
   Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) grant [EP/T000090/1]; Department for
   Education
FX This work (and the time of L.D., K.B, D.B. and J.L.) was funded under
   the Strategic Priority Fund for UK Climate Resilience. The UK Climate
   Resilience programme is supported by the UKRI Strategic Priorities Fund.
   The programme is co-delivered by the Met Office and NERC on behalf of
   UKRI partners AHRC, EPSRC and ESRC. T.E. was funded by the European
   Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant
   agreement No. 856612
   https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/funding/funding-
   opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe_en and
   the Cyprus Government. The building modelling study was funded by an
   Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) grant,
   'Advancing School Performance: Indoor Environmental Quality, Resilience
   and Educational Outcomes' (ASPIRE, EP/T000090/1) . The authors
   gratefully acknowledge the supply of data and support by the Department
   for Education.
CR Angelov P., 2021, Explainable Artificial Intelligence: An Analytical Review. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, P11
   [Anonymous], 2012, The UK Climate Change Risk Assessment 2012 Evidence Report
   [Anonymous], 2009, Technical report
   Arnell NW, 2021, CLIM RISK MANAG, V31, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2020.100265
   Arup, 2022, Addressing overheating risk in existing UK homes
   Aznar-Siguan G, 2019, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V12, P3085, DOI 10.5194/gmd-12-3085-2019
   Betts R.A., 2021, Technical report
   Betts R A., 2021, The Third UK Climate Change Risk Assessment Technical Report
   Cibse, 2008, Tech. Rep
   Clark KM, 2002, GENEVA PAP R I-ISS P, V27, P181, DOI 10.1111/1468-0440.00163
   Crespi A, 2023, CLIM SERV, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2023.100373
   Dawkins LC, 2023, CLIM RISK MANAG, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2023.100510
   Dawkins LC, 2023, CLIM RISK MANAG, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2023.100511
   Defra, 2023, Tech. Rep.
   Department for Education, 2017, Get information about schools
   DFE, 2023, Sustainability and climate change: a strategy for the education and children's services systems
   DLUHC, 2019, Tech. Rep.
   Dong J, 2023, BUILD SERV ENG RES T, V44, P333, DOI 10.1177/01436244231163084
   Dong J, 2023, BUILD ENVIRON, V243, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110607
   Economou T, 2023, PEERJ, V11, DOI 10.7717/peerj.14519
   Education & Skills Funding Agency, 2018, Technical report
   Education & Skills Funding Agency, 2016, Priority school building programme: overview
   Garry FK, 2021, CLIM RISK MANAG, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100282
   Gelman A., 2014, BAYESIAN DATA ANAL
   Godoy-Shimizu D, 2022, BUILD CITIES, V3, P939, DOI 10.5334/bc.264
   Grassie D, 2023, J BUILD ENG, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105536
   Grassie D, 2022, BUILD CITIES, V3, P204, DOI 10.5334/bc.159
   Hanlon HM, 2021, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V166, DOI 10.1007/s10584-021-03100-5
   Hawchar L, 2020, CLIM RISK MANAG, V29, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2020.100235
   Hollis D, 2019, GEOSCI DATA J, V6, P151, DOI 10.1002/gdj3.78
   Iturbide M., 2021, Repository supporting the implementation of fair principles in the ipcc-wg1 atlas. zenodo
   Johnson H., 2005, EUROSURVEILLANCE, V10, P168, DOI DOI 10.2807/ESM.10.07.00558-EN
   Lan C, 2023, J MAR SCI ENG, V11, DOI 10.3390/jmse11071420
   Lowe J.A., 2018, UKCP18 SCI OVERVIEW
   Mayor of London, 2020, How london schools and early years settings can adapt to climate change
   Met Office Hadley Centre, 2019, UKCP18 Convection-Permitting Model Projections for the UK at 5km resolution
   Murphy J., 2019, UKCP18 Land Projections: Science Report 2018
   Mylona A, 2012, BUILD SERV ENG RES T, V33, P51, DOI 10.1177/0143624411428951
   Nikulin G, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aab1b1
   Oikonomou E., 2020, Assessing heat vulnerability in london care settings: case studies of adaptation to climate change
   Paulik R, 2023, NAT HAZARDS, V119, P1073, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05593-4
   Petitti DB, 2016, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V124, P176, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1409119
   Riahi K, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P33, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y
   Sayers P, 2024, NAT HAZARDS, V120, P3773, DOI 10.1007/s11069-023-06350-x
   Schleussner CF, 2016, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V7, P327, DOI 10.5194/esd-7-327-2016
   Schwartz Y, 2022, ENERG BUILDINGS, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111566
   Simpson G., 2022, Using random effects in gams with mgcv
   Stalhandske Z, 2022, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V22, P2531, DOI 10.5194/nhess-22-2531-2022
   Steptoe H, 2023, FRONT BIG DATA, V6, DOI 10.3389/fdata.2023.1198097
   Steptoe H, 2021, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V21, P1313, DOI 10.5194/nhess-21-1313-2021
   Strauss BH, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22838-1
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Switanek MB, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P2649, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-2649-2017
   Taylor T, 2021, P LCAW SCH SUMM CLIM
   Thompson EL, 2019, ECONOMICS-KIEL, V13, DOI 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2019-40
   Thompson R, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19106123
   Tsoulou I., 2022, Assessing the current and future risk of overheating in London's care homes: the effect of passive ventilation
   U.S. Department of Energy, 2021, EnergyPlus Version 9.5.0
   UK Health and Security Agency, 2023, Looking after children and those in early years settings before and during hot weather: teachers and other educational professionals
   UK Health Security Agency, 2022, Heat mortality monitoring report: 2022
   Wargocki P, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V157, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.04.046
   Williams KD, 2018, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V10, P357, DOI 10.1002/2017MS001115
   Wood SN, 2016, J AM STAT ASSOC, V111, P1548, DOI 10.1080/01621459.2016.1180986
   Zennaro F, 2021, EARTH-SCI REV, V220, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103752
NR 64
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 4
U2 4
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0963
J9 CLIM RISK MANAG
JI CLIM. RISK MANAG.
PY 2024
VL 44
AR 100602
DI 10.1016/j.crm.2024.100602
EA MAR 2024
PG 24
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA QS7H6
UT WOS:001222920300001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Parsons, M
   Asena, Q
   Johnson, D
   Nalau, J
AF Parsons, Meg
   Asena, Quinn
   Johnson, Danielle
   Nalau, Johanna
TI A bibliometric and topic analysis of climate justice: Mapping trends,
   voices, and the way forward
SO CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
ID CHANGE ADAPTATION; SOCIAL-JUSTICE; HEALTH; VULNERABILITY; RECOGNITION;
   EXCLUSION; EMISSIONS; POLITICS; ACTIVISM; FEMINIST
AB The field of climate justice has been growing in relevance since its conception in 1997. This paper presents a comprehensive bibliometric and topic modelling analyses to examine the evolution and trajectory of the climate justice literature. We analyse 1,683 publications covering the period from 1997 to 2021, highlighting foundational works, influential authors, leading nations and institutions, and prevailing research topics within this field. We employ Latent Dirichlet Allocation to uncover latent research trends in the literature providing a crucial baseline for future scholarly endeavours and policy development in the realm of climate justice. Our results show that the field of climate justice has grown exponentially from less than 5 papers annually between 1997 and 2005, to around 200 papers annually in recent years. This growth has seen a diversification of research themes with an increase in papers around the topics of health, vulnerability and adaptation, and policy and activism. There has been a consistent backdrop of publications around the topics of sustainable development and policy, and international relations and carbon emissions. Other prominent topics in the literature include education and food security, and human rights and Indigenous people. The field has moved from theoretical research to examining actual examples of climate injustices, with an increased diversification of topics. Future research could usefully focus on exploring future generations and more -than -human entities; the integration of climate justice and climate activism with broader struggles for justice; re -thinking climate adaptation "success" and "effectiveness" through the lens of climate justice, and the ramifications of the Global Goal on Adaptation on climate justice led -approaches that are inclusive, build on human rights approaches, and extend the scale of adaptation analysis beyond the local. It is imperative to prioritise addressing the climate justice needs of those most affected by climate change, transcending national borders, generational gaps, cultural differences, and even the well-being of various species. Such a holistic approach will help inform and refine global climate policy and action.
C1 [Parsons, Meg; Asena, Quinn] Univ Auckland, Sch Environm, Auckland, New Zealand.
   [Asena, Quinn] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Ives Lab, Madison, WI USA.
   [Johnson, Danielle] NIWA, Auckland, New Zealand.
   [Nalau, Johanna] Griffith Univ, Sch Environm & Sci, Griffith, Australia.
C3 University of Auckland; University of Wisconsin System; University of
   Wisconsin Madison; National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research
   (NIWA) - New Zealand; Griffith University
RP Parsons, M (corresponding author), Univ Auckland, Sch Environm, Auckland, New Zealand.
EM meg.parsons@auckland.ac.nz; qasena@wisc.edu;
   Danielle.Johnson@niwa.co.nz; nalau@griffith.edu.au
RI Asena, Quinn/GYJ-4101-2022; Nalau, Johanna/V-5692-2018; Parsons,
   Meg/C-2405-2019
OI Nalau, Johanna/0000-0001-6581-3967; Parsons, Meg/0000-0001-8721-659X
CR Ackerly B, 2019, DISCOURSE ON RIGHTS IN INDIA: DEBATES AND DILEMMAS, P135
   Adamson J, 2014, CAMBR COMPANION LIT, P169
   Adelman S, 2016, J HUM RIGHTS ENVIRON, V7, P32, DOI 10.4337/jhre.2016.01.02
   Ahmed ME, 2016, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V8, P539, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-06-2015-0085
   Ahmed S, 2021, ASIAN AFF, V52, P155, DOI 10.1080/03068374.2021.1880213
   Alcaraz O, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V149, P131, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2224-0
   [Anonymous], 1997, Environ. Polit., DOI [DOI 10.1080/, DOI 10.1080/09644019708414340]
   [Anonymous], 2016, JOSS, DOI [DOI 10.21105/JOSS.00037, 10.21105/joss.00037]
   Antadze N, 2019, ANTHROPOCENE REV, V6, P38, DOI 10.1177/2053019619843679
   Arel-Bundock V, 2018, J Open Source Softw, V3, P848, DOI 10.21105/joss.00848
   Asmi F, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V62, P2393, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2018.1541171
   Atapattu S, 2018, J HUM RIGHTS ENVIRON, V9, P68, DOI 10.4337/jhre.2018.01.04
   Axon S., 2019, ENV SPACE PLACE, V11, P1, DOI [10.5749/envispacplac.11.2.0001, DOI 10.5749/ENVISPACPLAC.11.2.0001]
   Basu D, 2019, INTEGR STEM EDU CONF, P239, DOI [10.1109/isecon.2019.8882109, 10.1109/ISECon.2019.8882109]
   Bauer N, 2020, NATURE, V588, P261, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2982-5
   Baxi U, 2016, J HUM RIGHTS ENVIRON, V7, P7, DOI 10.4337/jhre.2016.01.01
   Black ST, 2016, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V40, P284, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12341
   Blei DM, 2012, COMMUN ACM, V55, P77, DOI 10.1145/2133806.2133826
   Moreira MNB, 2022, FUTURE FOODS, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.fufo.2022.100120
   Boeckmann M, 2016, HEALTHCARE-BASEL, V4, DOI 10.3390/healthcare4030065
   Bond S, 2020, T I BRIT GEOGR, V45, P750, DOI 10.1111/tran.12382
   Bouchet-Valat M., 2020, UTF-8 library
   Boyd-Graber Jordan, 2014, Handbook of mixed membership models and their applications
   Bulkeley H, 2013, ROUTL CRIT INTRO URB, P1
   Bulkeley H., 2003, Routledge Studies in Physical Geography and Environment
   Torres PHC, 2020, ENVIRON JUSTICE, V13, P42, DOI 10.1089/env.2019.0043
   Carmichael C, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11205688
   Chalupka S, 2020, ENVIRON JUSTICE, V13, P10, DOI 10.1089/env.2019.0034
   Chalupka S, 2019, CREAT NURS, V25, P249, DOI 10.1891/1078-4535.25.3.249
   Chu E, 2019, ENVIRON URBAN, V31, P139, DOI 10.1177/0956247818814449
   Ciplet D, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V13, P49, DOI 10.1162/GLEP_a_00153
   Cultural Survival, 2022, Indigenous Youth Speak on Climate Justice [WWW Document]
   Curtis SE, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P654, DOI 10.1177/0309132511423350
   De Saillan C, 2007, NAT RESOUR J, V47, P793
   Deneulin S, 2013, INT J SOC ECON, V40, P624, DOI 10.1108/IJSE-2012-0127
   Divakaran B, 2016, CREAT NURS, V22, P243, DOI 10.1891/1078-4535.22.4.243
   Eakin H, 2006, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V31, P365, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144352
   Eaves LE, 2021, GEOFORUM, V118, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.04.002
   Eriksen S, 2011, CLIM DEV, V3, P7, DOI 10.3763/cdev.2010.0060
   Fancy David C.A., 2021, Theatre Pedagogy in the Era of Climate Crisis
   Fayazi M, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101750
   Fazey I, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P197, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301864
   Ford J, 2016, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V139, P429, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1820-0
   Alves MWFM, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V202, P360, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.091
   García-López GA, 2018, ENVIRON JUSTICE, V11, P101, DOI 10.1089/env.2017.0045
   Gonzalez-Ricoy I, 2019, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V10, DOI 10.1002/wcc.598
   Goodman D, 2012, ROUT STUD GASTRO FOO, P1
   Grady-Benson J, 2016, LOCAL ENVIRON, V21, P661, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2015.1009825
   Grosse C, 2020, J HUM RIGHTS ENVIRON, V11, P146, DOI 10.4337/jhre.2020.03.07
   Gutschow B, 2021, CURR PROB PEDIATR AD, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.cppeds.2021.101028
   Harris P. G, 2019, A Research Agenda for Climate Justice
   Hens L., 2014, J CHEM TECHNOLOGY ME, V49, P194
   Hilert AJ, 2021, J MULTICULT COUNS D, V49, P175, DOI 10.1002/jmcd.12223
   Hjorthen FD, 2020, POLIT STUD-LONDON, V68, P936, DOI 10.1177/0032321719882607
   Holland B, 2017, ENVIRON POLIT, V26, P391, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2017.1287625
   Howard-Jones P, 2021, ENVIRON EDUC RES, V27, P1660, DOI 10.1080/13504622.2021.1937576
   James D, 2020, J HUM RIGHTS ENVIRON, V11, P32, DOI 10.4337/jhre.2020.03.02
   Jesdale BM, 2013, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V121, P811, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1205919
   Kabisch N, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V107, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.008
   Kabisch N, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08373-210239
   Karber P., 2015, Postmarks from a Political Traveler, DOI [10.4324/9781315632674, DOI 10.4324/9781315632674]
   Khan M, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V161, P251, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02563-x
   Larson PS, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18147659
   Leach M., 2010, DYNAMIC SUSTAINABILI, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9781849775069, 10.4324/9781849775069]
   MacUt I., 2019, Crkva u Svijetu, V54, P413
   Malanski PD, 2021, J RURAL STUD, V81, P305, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.050
   Martiskainen M, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102180
   Mary Robinson Foundation, 2021, Climate Justice: Principles of Climate Justice [WWW Document]
   McIntosh Peggy, 2017, Privilege: A Reader, P28
   Méndez-Barrientos LE, 2023, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V6, P1614, DOI 10.1177/25148486221133282
   Milanez F., 2022, IDS Bull., V53, DOI [10.19088/1968-2022.140, DOI 10.19088/1968-2022.140]
   Mitchell BC, 2018, LOCAL ENVIRON, V23, P796, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2018.1474861
   Murakami A, 2017, CORPORA, V12, P243, DOI 10.3366/cor.2017.0118
   Muschelli J., 2019, RSCOPUS SCOPUS DATAB
   Nalau J, 2021, CLIM RISK MANAG, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100290
   Newell P, 2021, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V12, DOI 10.1002/wcc.733
   Nicholas PK, 2017, J NURS SCHOLARSHIP, V49, P606, DOI 10.1111/jnu.12326
   Nightingale AJ, 2017, GEOFORUM, V84, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.011
   Nixon Rob., 2011, Environment at the Margins: Literary and Environmental Studies in Africa, P257
   Nursey-Bray M, 2018, HELIYON, V4, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00565
   Oberman R., 2021, TEACHING SUSTAINABLE, P69
   Okereke C, 2016, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V7, P834, DOI 10.1002/wcc.419
   Osiecki KM, 2021, ENVIRON JUSTICE, V14, P178, DOI 10.1089/env.2020.0040
   Paavola J, 2006, ECOL ECON, V56, P594, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.015
   Paavola J, 2008, ENVIRON POLIT, V17, P644, DOI 10.1080/09644010802193609
   Page E, 1999, POLIT STUD-LONDON, V47, P53, DOI 10.1111/1467-9248.00187
   Parsons M, 2015, APPLIED STUDIES IN CLIMATE ADAPTATION, P283
   Perry GLW, 2021, NEW ZEAL J ECOL, V45, DOI 10.20417/nzjecol.45.12
   Piispa M, 2022, J YOUTH STUD, V25, P897, DOI 10.1080/13676261.2021.1923677
   Pretty J, 2010, INT J AGR SUSTAIN, V8, P219, DOI 10.3763/ijas.2010.0534
   Pye O, 2010, J PEASANT STUD, V37, P851, DOI 10.1080/03066150.2010.512461
   Rice JL, 2023, GEOGR JUST SOC TRANS, P1
   Robert M., 2009, Threatened Island Nations: Legal Implications of Rising Seas and a Changing Climate, P589, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781139198776.022, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139198776.022]
   Roberts JT, 2009, INT J COMP SOCIOL, V50, P385, DOI 10.1177/0020715209105147
   Sandhaus Shana, 2018, Pedagogy Health Promot, V4, P260, DOI 10.1177/2373379917751476
   Schleich J, 2016, CLIM POLICY, V16, P50, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2014.979129
   Schlosberg D, 2014, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V5, P359, DOI 10.1002/wcc.275
   Setzer J, 2019, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V10, DOI 10.1002/wcc.580
   Sheffield PE, 2011, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V119, P291, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1002233
   Smith RAJ, 2016, GEOFORUM, V73, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.11.008
   Smith Tuhiwai., 2012, Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
   Steininger K, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V24, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.10.005
   Stoddart MCJ, 2016, CAN REV SOCIOL, V53, P316, DOI 10.1111/cars.12111
   Sultana F, 2022, GEOGR J, V188, P118, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12417
   Sultana F, 2018, WATER SECUR NEW WOR, P17, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-64046-4_2
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Team RC, 2021, R LANGUAGE ENV STAT
   Thomas A, 2019, NEW ZEAL GEOGR, V75, P96, DOI 10.1111/nzg.12229
   Thomas DSG, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.10.001
   Torpman O, 2019, ETHICAL THEORY MORAL, V22, P749, DOI 10.1007/s10677-019-10016-8
   Tschakert P, 2021, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V12, DOI 10.1002/wcc.699
   Tschakert P, 2012, GEOGR TIDSSKR-DEN, V112, P144, DOI 10.1080/00167223.2012.741889
   United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2001, REPORT C PARTIES ITS
   Walker G., 2012, Environmental Justice: Concepts, Evidence and Politics, DOI [10.4324/9780203610671, DOI 10.4324/9780203610671]
   Waltman L, 2010, J INFORMETR, V4, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
   White PJ, 2022, AUST J ENVIRON EDUC, V38, P26, DOI 10.1017/aee.2021.24
   Whyte K, 2020, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V11, DOI 10.1002/wcc.603
   Wijsman K, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V98, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.017
   Wilkens J, 2022, INT AFF, V98, P125, DOI 10.1093/ia/iiab209
   Winter C., 2023, Cultural Politics, V19, P39, DOI [10.1215/17432197-10232459, DOI 10.1215/17432197-10232459]
   Winter CJ, 2019, ENVIRON VALUE, V28, P9, DOI 10.3197/096327119X15445433913550
   Zimm C, 2024, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V14, P22, DOI 10.1038/s41558-023-01869-0
   Ziser M, 2017, LIT CONTEXT, P342
NR 123
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 7
U2 13
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0963
J9 CLIM RISK MANAG
JI CLIM. RISK MANAG.
PY 2024
VL 44
AR 100593
DI 10.1016/j.crm.2024.100593
EA MAR 2024
PG 20
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA NC5O3
UT WOS:001198264900001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Bottaro, G
   Liagre, L
   Pettenella, D
AF Bottaro, Giorgia
   Liagre, Ludwig
   Pettenella, Davide
TI The Forest Sector in EU Member States' National Recovery and Resilience
   Plans: a preliminary analysis
SO FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS
LA English
DT Article
DE Recovery plans; Forest sector; Policy innovation; Policy instrument; EU
   new green deal
AB The role of forests in reaching the environmental policies targets of the European Union (EU) is being increasingly recognised. Consequently, investing in the forest sector takes on a fundamental role. Different funding opportunities are already in place in the EU, but there are some limitations in accessing them. New funding opportunities arose more recently. To support the recovery process of Member States (MS) after the Covid-19 pandemic, the EU is making significant efforts through NextGenerationEU, funding MS after the European Commission (EC) approval of the National Recovery and Resilience Plans (NRRPs). No specific guidelines are present to finance the forest sector. The aim of this paper is to investigate how the forest sector has been taken into account in the NRRPs through an analysis of the contents of 26 NRRPs. Financial investments in the sector by action types have also been analysed. Finally, commonalities and differences between MS have been extracted by means of a cluster analysis. Results show that the majority of MS dedicate a portion of their funds to the forest sector and there were no investments in the sector in only four countries. One-third of MS have foreseen a dedicated portion of the funds to the sector. The forest-related themes most represented in the NRRPs are: biodiversity protection, climate adaptation, forest-based ecosystem services management, climate mitigation, rural development and innovation. The cluster analysis identifies three MS clusters, giving evidence about the MS behaviour in a non-ordinary funding situation. The first one is characterised by more traditional countries, while in the other two clusters innovation plays an important role. The second cluster orients innovation towards wood-related products, while innovation in the third cluster is addressed to support forest multifunctionality. Results can support national and European decision-makers to plan national strategies, funds allocation, or to act at European level knowing which are the priorities given by the different MS.
C1 [Bottaro, Giorgia; Liagre, Ludwig; Pettenella, Davide] Univ Padua, Dept Land Environm Agr & Forestry, Viale Univ 16, I-35020 Padua, Italy.
C3 University of Padua
RP Bottaro, G (corresponding author), Univ Padua, Dept Land Environm Agr & Forestry, Viale Univ 16, I-35020 Padua, Italy.
EM giorgia.bottaro@unipd.it; davide.pettenella@unipd.it
RI Pettenella, Davide/B-6874-2012
OI Pettenella, Davide/0000-0002-7403-9560
CR Abdi H., 2007, Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412952644
   Aiken M., 2011, Transl. J, V16
   Aiken M., 2019, Stud Linguist Literature, V3, P253, DOI [10.22158/sll.v3n3p253, DOI 10.22158/SLL.V3N3P253]
   [Anonymous], 2021, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Central Bank, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - The European economic and financial system: fostering openness, strength and resilience
   [Anonymous], 2020, COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS: A new Circular Economy Action, Plan For a cleaner and more competitive Europe
   [Anonymous], 2020, EU Biodiversity Strategy
   [Anonymous], 2020, State of Europes Forests 2020
   [Anonymous], 2022, Document 52022DC0230, communication (2022/230) from the commission to the EUROPEAN parliament, the EUROPEAN council, the council, the EUROPEAN economic and social committee and the committee of the regions REPowerEU plan
   Azoulay P, 2020, SCIENCE, V368, P553, DOI 10.1126/science.abc5792
   Chirici G., 2019, FOREST@, V16, P3, DOI [10.3832/efor3070-016, DOI 10.3832/efor3070-016, 10.3832/EFOR3070-016]
   EC, 2018, European Commission. Evaluation Study of the Forestry Measures under Rural Development : Final Report, DOI [10.2762/06029, DOI 10.2762/06029]
   EC, 2021, EUROPEAN COMMISSION
   EEA, 2023, European Environment Agency. Annual European Union greenhouse gas inventory 1990-2021 and inventory report 2023
   EIB, 2022, European Investment Bank. Forests at the heart of sustainable development: investing in forests to meet biodiversity and climate goals, DOI [10.2867/160826, DOI 10.2867/160826]
   Elands B., 2003, EU/FAIR Research Project 'Multifor.RD': Multifunctional Forestry as a Means to Rural Development (FAIR6 - CT98 - 4223
   EU, 2018, Special report n33/2018
   European Commission, 2022, EU BIOEC STRAT PROGR
   European Commission, 2020, A new Circular Economy Action Plan For a cleaner and more competitive Europe, DOI [10.2779/05068, DOI 10.2779/05068]
   European Commission (EC), 2019, COM/2019/640 final, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004]
   Fabbrini F, 2022, J MOD ITAL STUD, V27, P658, DOI 10.1080/1354571X.2022.2124672
   FAO, 2020, Food and Agriculture Organisation. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: FRA 2020 Database
   Ferrara C, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V654, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.049
   Filippini Tommaso, 2021, Acta Biomed, V92, pe2021463, DOI 10.23750/abm.v92iS6.12339
   Forzieri G, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-21399-7
   García-Nieto AP, 2013, ECOSYST SERV, V4, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.03.003
   Haeler E, 2023, FOREST POLICY ECON, V146, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102882
   Hetemaki L, 2020, The Forest Industry around the Baltic Sea Region: Future Challenges and Opportunities
   Husson F, 2014, COMP SCI DATA ANAL S, P165
   Kapoor H, 2021, FRONT PSYCHOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.593359
   Korhonen K, 2020, FOREST EUROPE 2020 S
   Kotseva-Tikova M, 2022, ROM J EUR AFF, V22, P79
   Le S, 2008, J STAT SOFTW, V25, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v025.i01
   Lier M, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102481
   Mayring P., 2019, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, V20, P16, DOI DOI 10.17169/FQS-1.2.1089
   Mina M, 2017, J APPL ECOL, V54, P389, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12772
   Nabuurs G.J., 2015, From Science to Policy, V2
   OECD [Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development], 2017, OECD REPORT FOR THE G7 ENVIRONMENT MINISTERS
   Orsi F, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104840
   Ottone V, 2022, CONTEMP ITAL POLIT, V14, P409, DOI 10.1080/23248823.2022.2120449
   Passaro P, 2024, BRIT FOOD J, V126, P98, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-09-2022-0796
   Patrucco AS, 2022, R&D MANAGE, V52, P273, DOI 10.1111/radm.12495
   Perchinunno P, 2024, SOC INDIC RES, V175, P763, DOI 10.1007/s11205-023-03078-w
   Pfeiffer P., 2021, European Economy - Discussion Papers 20x5-x44
   Prontera A, 2023, CONTEMP ITAL POLIT, V15, P252, DOI 10.1080/23248823.2023.2193462
   Romanian RRP, 2021, National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PlanulNational de RedresaresiRezilienta)
   Scriban RE, 2019, FOREST POLICY ECON, V99, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.018
   Seneviratne S. I., 2021, Climate Change 2021-The Physical Science Basis, P1513, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781009157896.013, 10.1017/9781009157896.013]
   Silva E.J., 2022, Green Forest Jobs in the pan-European Region, P49
   Sweden RRP, 2021, Sweden's recovery plan (Sverigesaterhamtningsplan)
   UNECE and FAO, 2020, GENEVA TIMBER AND FOREST DISCUSSION PAPER 76
NR 50
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 1
U2 3
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1389-9341
EI 1872-7050
J9 FOREST POLICY ECON
JI Forest Policy Econ.
PD MAR
PY 2024
VL 160
AR 103157
DI 10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103157
EA JAN 2024
PG 11
WC Economics; Environmental Studies; Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry
GA IE9S6
UT WOS:001164774900001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Pereira, RD
   Brazilio, LD
   Trejo-Rangel, MA
   dos Santos, MD
   Silva, LMB
   Souza, LF
   Barbosa, ACS
   de Oliveira, MR
   dos Santos, R
   Sato, DP
   Iwama, AY
AF Pereira, Rafael Damasceno
   Brazilio, Lucas de Paula
   Trejo-Rangel, Miguel Angel
   dos Santos, Mauricio Duarte
   Silva, Leticia Milene Bezerra
   Souza, Lilian Fraciele
   Barbosa, Ana Carolina Santana
   de Oliveira, Mario Ricardo
   dos Santos, Ronaldo
   Sato, Danilo Pereira
   Iwama, Allan Yu
TI Traditional and local communities as key actors to identify
   climate-related disaster impacts: a citizen science approach in
   Southeast Brazilian coastal areas
SO FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE
LA English
DT Article
DE collaborative research; climate change impacts; vulnerability; local
   indicators of climate change; disaster risk management
ID RISK; VULNERABILITY; ADAPTATION; KNOWLEDGE; AMERICA; LESSONS; SYSTEMS;
   PEOPLE; PAULO
AB The impacts of climate-related disasters can be estimated by climate models. However, climate models are frequently downscaled to specific settings to facilitate Disaster Risk Management (DRM) to better understand local impacts and avoid overlooking uncertainties. Several studies have registered the increasing importance of recognizing traditional knowledge, co-design, and collaboration with local communities in developing DRM strategies. The objective of this research was co-design local-scale observations with traditional and local communities to characterize their local context regarding the impacts of climate-related disasters. The citizen science approach coupled with participatory action research was conducted with two traditional communities in the Southeast of the Brazilian coast: Quilombo do Campinho da Independencia in Paraty, Rio de Janeiro, and the Caicara (artisanal fishing) community of Ubatumirim in Ubatuba, Sao Paulo. Working groups were organized with leaders to become community researchers, conducting interviews and actively mobilizing their communities. A structured questionnaire was developed, adapting 22 variables taken from the Protocol for the Collection of Cross-Cultural Comparative Data on Local Indicators of Climate Change Impacts-LICCI Protocol. A total of 366 impacts were analyzed, after combining the georeferencing form data collected-Survey123 (280 impacts) and the interviews with community leaders (86 impacts). The results showed a significant level of cohesion (alpha = 0.01) between the Caicara (artisanal fishers) and Quilombola (Afro-descendants) perceptions of climate-related events associated with their subsistence practices and climate variability. These findings highlighting the importance of DRM proposals that recognize traditional peoples and local communities as frontline vulnerable populations while acknowledging their role as key actors in identifying impacts, collecting data on land use and territory, subsistence-oriented activities, and cosmovision. However, it is still necessary to address climate change challenges at different scales. To do this, it is crucial to promote cognitive justice though the recognition of the values of the memories, perceptions and local knowledge, by scaling up locally-driven observations that empower local communities to lead their own climate adaptation efforts.
C1 [Pereira, Rafael Damasceno] Brazilian Minist Sci Technol & Innovat, Natl Ctr Monitoring & Early Warnings Nat Disasters, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil.
   [Brazilio, Lucas de Paula; Silva, Leticia Milene Bezerra] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Arts Sci & Humanities, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
   [Trejo-Rangel, Miguel Angel] Maynooth Univ, Dept Geog, Irish Climate Anal & Res UnitS ICARUS, Maynooth, Kildare, Ireland.
   [dos Santos, Mauricio Duarte] Univ Prebiteriana Mackenzie, Polit & Econ Law Program, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
   [Souza, Lilian Fraciele; dos Santos, Ronaldo] Assoc Residents Campinho Independencia Quilombo, Paraty, Brazil.
   [Barbosa, Ana Carolina Santana; de Oliveira, Mario Ricardo] Caicara Museum, Assoc Friends, Ubatuba, Brazil.
   [dos Santos, Ronaldo] Brazilian Minist Racial Equal, Secretary Policies Quilombolas African Diaspor Peo, Brasilia, Brazil.
   [Sato, Danilo Pereira] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Philosophy Languages & Human Sci, Postgrad Program Human Geog, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
   [Iwama, Allan Yu] Univ Fed Paraiba, Postgrad Program Dev & Environm, Joao Pessoa, Brazil.
C3 Universidade de Sao Paulo; Maynooth University; Universidade
   Presbiteriana Mackenzie; Universidade de Sao Paulo; Universidade Federal
   da Paraiba
RP Pereira, RD (corresponding author), Brazilian Minist Sci Technol & Innovat, Natl Ctr Monitoring & Early Warnings Nat Disasters, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil.
EM rafaeldamasceno@alumni.usp.br
RI Sato, Danilo/ADR-8444-2022; Iwama, Allan/V-3511-2019; Trejo-Rangel,
   Miguel/IUN-0048-2023
OI Pereira Sato, Danilo/0000-0001-8127-7922; Damasceno Pereira,
   Rafael/0000-0003-2122-7549
FU British Council [715066064-RIAP 3/2021]; Ayni Institute for
   Environmental Conservation and Social Development [3180705/2018];
   IDRC/SSHRC through the Queen Elizabeth Scholars project on Ecological
   Economics, Commons Governance [2017-0082]
FX The research project was funded by the British Council [715066064-RIAP
   3/2021] through Citizen science and traditional coastal communities in
   adapting to climate change: building a Brazilian observation network,
   supported by the Ayni Institute for Environmental Conservation and
   Social Development. We acknowledge the ANID/FONDECYT [3180705/2018],
   IDRC/SSHRC through the Queen Elizabeth Scholars project on Ecological
   Economics, Commons Governance, and Climate Justice [2017-0082].r The
   research project was funded by the British Council [715066064-RIAP
   3/2021] through Citizen science and traditional coastal communities in
   adapting to climate change: building a Brazilian observation network,
   supported by the Ayni Institute for Environmental Conservation and
   Social Development. We acknowledge the ANID/FONDECYT [3180705/2018],
   IDRC/SSHRC through the Queen Elizabeth Scholars project on Ecological
   Economics, Commons Governance, and Climate Justice [2017-0082].
CR ADAMS Cristina., 2000, Caicaras da Mata Atlantica: pesquisa cientifica versus planejamento e gestao ambiental
   Adger WN, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V93, P335, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z
   Albagli S, 2022, HUM SOC SCI COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1057/s41599-022-01040-8
   Alcântara E, 2023, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V23, P1157, DOI 10.5194/nhess-23-1157-2023
   [Anonymous], 2009, Understanding climate change adaptation, DOI [10.3362/9781780440415, DOI 10.3362/9781780440415]
   Appadurai A, 2006, GLOB SOC EDUC, V4, P167, DOI 10.1080/14767720600750696
   Araos F., 2019, Antropol. Del. Sur, V6, P87, DOI [10.25074/rantros.v6i12.1120, DOI 10.25074/RANTROS.V6I12.1120]
   Bañales-Seguel C, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12197895
   Barnett J, 2001, WORLD DEV, V29, P977, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00022-5
   Begossi A., 1996, Linking social Linking Social and Ecological Systems, P129
   Berkes F., 2003, Navigating social and ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511541957
   Berkes F, 2007, NAT HAZARDS, V41, P283, DOI 10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7
   Berkes F, 2009, J ROY SOC NEW ZEAL, V39, P151, DOI 10.1080/03014220909510568
   Birkmann J., 2009, Addressing the Challenge: Recommendations and Quality Criteria for Linking Disaster Risk Reduction and Adaptation to Climate Change
   Bograd SJ, 2019, FRONT MAR SCI, V6, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2019.00333
   Brasil-National Policy for the Sustainable Development of Traditional Peoples Communities, 2007, Decree 6,040/2007
   Brondizio ES, 2008, PHILOS T R SOC B, V363, P1803, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2007.0025
   Brondizio ES, 2021, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V46, P481, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-012127
   Bruno P. L., 2020, Res. Soc. Dev, V9, P10, DOI [10.1108/S1057-1922202025, DOI 10.1108/S1057-1922202025]
   Cains MG, 2019, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V39, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.005
   Cajigal-Molina E., 2017, Rev. Dialogos Educ, V17, P1445, DOI [10.7213/1981-416X.17.055.DS01, DOI 10.7213/1981-416X.17.055.DS01]
   Capobianco J. P. R., 2004, Meio Ambiente Brasil: Avancos e Obstaculos pos-Rio-92, P127
   CBHLN (Comite de Bacia Hidrografica do Litoral Norte), 2020, Ubatumirim and Sertao de Ubatumirim. Updated by LindaGeo (Litoral Norte Dados Abertos Geoespaciais)
   Chari R, 2019, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7689-x
   Charles A, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V106, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.01.019
   CPRM (Servico Geologico do Brasil), 2014, Relatorio Anual
   Daunt ABP, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105189
   David-Chavez DM, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaf300
   de Freitas LE, 2016, CLIM CHANG MANAG, P353, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-24660-4_20
   de Mello-Thery NA, 2020, CONFINS, V45, DOI 10.4000/confins.27859
   Di Giulio Gabriela Marques, 2014, Estud. av., V28, P41, DOI 10.1590/S0103-40142014000300004
   Díaz S, 2019, SCIENCE, V366, P1327, DOI 10.1126/science.aax3100
   Eakin HC, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V27, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.013
   Erisman JW, 2015, NATURE, V519, P151, DOI 10.1038/519151a
   Ferraro Junior L. A., 2014, Encontros e caminhos: Formacao de Educadoras(es) Ambientais e Coletivos Educadores, P59
   Finnis J, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V32, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.011
   Fracalanza A. P., 2015, Geousp, V19, P464, DOI [10.11606/issn.2179-0892.geousp.2015.103064, DOI 10.11606/ISSN.2179-0892.GEOUSP.2015.103064]
   Gonzalez-Gaudiano E. J., 2017, Rev. Interuniv, V29, P1, DOI [10.14201/teoredu291273294, DOI 10.14201/TEOREDU291273294]
   Haklay M., 2021, The Science of Citizen Science, P13, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-42, 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_2]
   Hicks A, 2019, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V7, DOI 10.3389/feart.2019.00226
   IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica), 2021, Malha Municipal Digital da Divisao Politico-Administrativa Brasileira.
   IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica), 2009, A rea de Aplicacao da Lei n  11.428, de 2006-Limite Mata Atlantica
   IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica), 2019, A reas Urbanizadas do Brasil
   INCRA (Instituto Nacional de Colonizacao e Reforma Agraria), 2022, A reas de Quilombolas
   International Panel on Climate Change, 2023, AR6 synthesis report: Climate change 2023
   IPT (Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnolcgicas) CPRM/SGB (Servico Geologico do Brasil), 2014, Cartas de Suscetibilidade a Movimentos Gravitacionais de Massa e Inundacoes. 1:25.000. Sao Paulo and Brasilia: IPT and CPRM
   Iwama AY, 2021, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V50, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.01.010
   Iwama Allan Yu, 2016, Ambient. soc., V19, P93
   Iwama Allan Yu, 2014, Ambient. soc., V17, P251, DOI 10.1590/1809-4422ASOC1149V1742014
   Kasten P, 2021, FRONT MAR SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2021.681969
   Klenk N, 2017, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V8, DOI 10.1002/wcc.475
   Kronik J, 2010, Indigenous peoples and climate change in Latin America and the Caribbean, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8237-0, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8237-0]
   Lee TM, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P1014, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2728
   LONDE LUCIANA DE RESENDE, 2018, Ambient. soc., V21, pe01022, DOI 10.1590/1809-4422asoc0102r2vu18l1ao
   Marchezini V., 2018, Rev. Gest. Sustentabilidade Ambient, V7, P525, DOI [10.19177/rgsa.v7e02018525-558, DOI 10.19177/RGSA.V7E02018525-558]
   Marchezini Victor, 2020, Saúde debate, V44, P33, DOI 10.1590/0103-11042020e203
   Marchezini V, 2018, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V6, DOI 10.3389/feart.2018.00184
   Marchezini V, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V8, P390, DOI 10.1007/s13753-017-0150-9
   Marengo J, 2023, CLIM DYNAM, V61, P2599, DOI 10.1007/s00382-023-06701-1
   Marengo JA, 2023, NAT HAZARDS, V116, P3617, DOI 10.1007/s11069-023-05827-z
   Maretti C. C., 2020, Analise da Situacao Legal e da Implementacao no Brasil; Territorios e Areas de Povos Indigenas e Comunidades Tradicionais e Locais no Brasil e Relacoes com os Conceitos Associados aos TICCAs. Instituto Sociedade
   Myers N, 2000, NATURE, V403, P853, DOI 10.1038/35002501
   Naess LO, 2013, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V4, P99, DOI 10.1002/wcc.204
   Inouye CEN, 2015, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V108, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.12.016
   Nakashima DJ., 2012, WEARING UNCERTAIN
   Norstrom AV, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P182, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2
   Observatorio de Territorios Sustentaveis e Saudaveis da Bocaina (OTSS), 2022, Projeto Povos: Territorio
   Olivato D., 2017, Reducao de Vulnerabilidade a Desastres: Do Conhecimento a Acao, P567
   Pereira R. S. D., 2022, Identificacion de soluciones locales para la gobernanza del riesgo climatico y de desastres en territorio Quilombola en Rio de Janeiro
   Pereira R. S. D., 2022, Rev. Brasil. Educ. Ambient, V17, P151, DOI [10.34024/revbea.2022.v17.13510, DOI 10.34024/REVBEA.2022.V17.13510]
   Daunt ABP, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V189, P352, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.05.003
   Pisor AC, 2022, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V12, P213, DOI 10.1038/s41558-022-01303-x
   planalto, 1988, Brasil-Federal Constitution of Brazil
   RAIMUNDO SIDNEI, 2015, Ambient. soc., V18, P291, DOI 10.1590/1809-4422ASOC0142V1842015
   Reyes-Garcia V., 2021, Protocol for the Collection of Cross-cultural Comparative Data on Local Indicators of Climate Change Impacts
   Reyes-García V, 2019, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V39, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.04.007
   Reyes-García V, 2016, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V7, P109, DOI 10.1002/wcc.374
   Rudiak-Gould P, 2013, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V5, P120, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00034.1
   Salgueiro-Otero D, 2020, MAR POLICY, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104123
   Santos B.D., 2007, Cognitive Justice in a Global World: Prudent Knowledges for a Decent Life
   Santos BD, 2018, END OF THE COGNITIVE EMPIRE, P1, DOI 10.1215/9781478002000
   Sato D. P., As Paisagens dos Riscos Sociais. Educar Para Diminuir a Vulnerabilidade
   Savo V, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P462, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2958, 10.1038/nclimate2958]
   Schimitt Alessandra., 2002, Ambiente e Sociedade, Ano, VV, P01, DOI DOI 10.1590/S1414-753X2002000100008
   Schumann S, 2007, MAR POLICY, V31, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2006.05.008
   Serrao-Neumann S, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V109, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.004
   Shirk JL, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-04705-170229
   Siegel S., 1977, Estatistica nao parametrica para as ciencias do comportamento
   Silva R. L. F., 2019, Pesquisa Educ. Ambient, V14, P57, DOI [10.18675/2177-580X.2019-14275, DOI 10.18675/2177-580X.2019-14275]
   Simoes E., 2015, Territorios em Disputa: Do Impasse ao Jogo Compartilhado Entre Tecnicos e Residentes-Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar
   Simoes E, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P1739, DOI 10.1007/s10113-017-1133-5
   Slovic P, 2010, SAUDE SOC, V19, P731, DOI 10.1590/S0104-12902010000400002
   SOS Mata Atlantica (Fundacao SOS Mata Atlantica) and INPE (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais), 2023, Atlas dos Remanescentes Florestais da Mata Atlantica: Per i odo 2021/2022, Relatorio Tecnico
   Stevens M, 2014, IEEE PERVAS COMPUT, V13, P20, DOI 10.1109/MPRV.2014.37
   SULAIMAN SAMIA NASCIMENTO, 2016, Estud. av., V30, P11, DOI 10.1590/s0103-40142016.30880003
   Tengö M, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P579, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3
   Trajber R, 2019, ACTION RES-LONDON, V17, P87, DOI 10.1177/1476750319829202
   Trejo-Rangel MA, 2022, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V31, P124, DOI 10.1108/DPM-03-2021-0100
   Veyret Y., 2007, Os riscos: O Homem Como Agressor E v, P23
   Wannewitz M, 2023, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101248
   Wisner B., 2017, DEAL DIS C DURH
NR 101
TC 0
Z9 1
U1 4
U2 15
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2624-9553
J9 FRONT CLIM
JI Front. Clim.
PD NOV 14
PY 2023
VL 5
AR 1243008
DI 10.3389/fclim.2023.1243008
PG 16
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA Z7VL3
UT WOS:001114116100001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Zu, KL
   Lenoir, J
   Fang, JY
   Tang, ZY
   Shen, ZH
   Ji, CJ
   Zheng, CY
   Luo, A
   Song, WQ
   Zimmermann, NE
   Pellissier, L
   Wang, ZH
AF Zu, Kuiling
   Lenoir, Jonathan
   Fang, Jingyun
   Tang, Zhiyao
   Shen, Zehao
   Ji, Chengjun
   Zheng, Chengyang
   Luo, Ao
   Song, Wenqi
   Zimmermann, Niklaus E.
   Pellissier, Loic
   Wang, Zhiheng
TI Elevational shift in seed plant distributions in China's mountains over
   the last 70 years
SO GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
LA English
DT Article
DE biodiversity redistribution; climate change; climatic niche; elevational
   gradients; macroecology; precipitation; upslope range shifts; velocity
   of species range shift
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; RANGE SHIFTS; SPECIES-RICHNESS; 4 DECADES; COMMUNITIES;
   FOREST; EVOLUTIONARY; CONTRACTIONS; COLLECTIONS; VEGETATION
AB Aim: Significant changes in species elevational ranges in mountains have been repeatedly documented, yet the direction, magnitude and drivers of these shifts remain controversial. Presently, there is still lacking evidence about the general nature of species elevational range shifts in eastern Eurasia in response to anthropogenic climate change. By using historical specimen records and recent field observations for 735 seed plant species across 29 China's mountains, we assessed changes in species' elevational centroids and their drivers.Location: China.Time Period: 1950-2018.Major Taxa Studied: Seed plant species.Methods: The elevation records of all sampled occurrences in each mountain during the two time periods were estimated, and the null models were developed to test the sampling bias. Ecological niche models (ENMs) were used to evaluate the relative importance of climate factors in constraining each species distribution. Generalized linear models (GLMs) to test the relationships between the centroid elevational range shifts of species and different divers.Results: We found that 54% of the species shifting upward and 46% downhill. However, species' elevational shifts significantly differed among species and mountains. Herbaceous and lowland species moved upward faster than woody and high-elevation species. Species in temperate mountains and in mountains with taller elevational gradients moved upward, while species in subtropical mountains and in mountains with shorter elevational gradients moved downward. Precipitation changes experienced by species, species' climatic adaptations, several species' functional traits and mountain size all contributed to explain the magnitude of species' centroid elevational range shifts.Main Conclusions: Our results highlight complex biodiversity redistribution of seed plants across Chinese mountains, not necessarily conforming to the trend of species upward shifts in elevation. Changes in precipitation regimes may blur the simplistic assumption of isotherm tracking. This study fills an important geographic shortfall for our understanding of biodiversity redistribution under anthropogenic climate change.
C1 [Zu, Kuiling; Fang, Jingyun; Tang, Zhiyao; Shen, Zehao; Ji, Chengjun; Zheng, Chengyang; Luo, Ao; Song, Wenqi; Wang, Zhiheng] Peking Univ, Inst Ecol, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Key Lab Earth Surface Proc Minist Educ, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
   [Zu, Kuiling] Jiangxi Agr Univ, Coll Forestry, Key Lab Natl Forestry, Grassland Adm Forest Ecosyst Protect & Restorat Po, Nanchang, Peoples R China.
   [Lenoir, Jonathan] Univ Picardie Jules Verne, UMR CNRS Ecol & Dynam Syst Anthropises EDYSAN 7058, Amiens, France.
   [Fang, Jingyun] Yunnan Univ, Coll Ecol & Environm Sci, Kunming, Peoples R China.
   [Pellissier, Loic] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Terr Ecosyst, Dept Environm Syst Sci, Landscape Ecol, Zurich, Switzerland.
   [Pellissier, Loic] Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, Unit Land Change Sci, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
C3 Peking University; Jiangxi Agricultural University; Universite de
   Picardie Jules Verne (UPJV); Yunnan University; Swiss Federal Institutes
   of Technology Domain; ETH Zurich; Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology
   Domain; Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow & Landscape Research
RP Wang, ZH (corresponding author), Peking Univ, Inst Ecol, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Key Lab Earth Surface Proc Minist Educ, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
EM zhiheng.wang@pku.edu.cn
RI Luo, Ao/HJZ-3541-2023; Wang, Zhiheng/G-1750-2010; Pellissier,
   Loïc/AAG-1013-2020; Shen, Zehao/GQI-1121-2022; Lenoir,
   Jonathan/AAE-8441-2019; Tang, Zhiyao/B-8795-2008; Zimmermann,
   Niklaus/A-4276-2008
OI Zu, Kuiling/0000-0002-0415-1370; Zimmermann,
   Niklaus/0000-0003-3099-9604; Tang, Zhiyao/0000-0003-0154-6403
FU National Key Research Development Program of China [2022YFF0802300];
   Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education Science and Technology
   Research Project [GJJ2200433]; National Natural Science Foundation of
   China [32125026, 31988102]; Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi, China
   [20224BAB213033]; Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy
   of Sciences [XDB31000000]
FX The National Key Research Development Program of China, Grant/Award
   Number: 2022YFF0802300; Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education
   Science and Technology Research Project, Grant/Award Number: GJJ2200433;
   the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number:
   #32125026 and #31988102; the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi,
   China, Grant/Award Number: 20224BAB213033; the Strategic Priority
   Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Grant/Award Number:
   XDB31000000
CR Alexander JM, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P563, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13976
   Bai F, 2008, SCI CHINA SER C, V51, P948, DOI 10.1007/s11427-008-0122-9
   Bhatta KP, 2018, ECOSPHERE, V9, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2084
   Chen IC, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P1024, DOI 10.1126/science.1206432
   Chen IC, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P1479, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0809320106
   Crimmins SM, 2011, SCIENCE, V331, P324, DOI 10.1126/science.1199040
   Dauby G, 2016, PHYTOKEYS, P1, DOI 10.3897/phytokeys.74.9723
   De Frenne P, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P18561, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1311190110
   Devictor V, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P121, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1347
   Fang JY, 2012, ECOGRAPHY, V35, P1059, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00161.x
   Feeley KJ, 2017, DIVERS DISTRIB, V23, P231, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12517
   Feeley KJ, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P1335, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02602.x
   Freeman BG, 2021, ECOL LETT, V24, P1697, DOI 10.1111/ele.13762
   Freeman BG, 2018, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V27, P1268, DOI 10.1111/geb.12774
   Ghalambor CK, 2006, INTEGR COMP BIOL, V46, P5, DOI 10.1093/icb/icj003
   Grinnell J, 1917, AM NAT, V51, P115, DOI 10.1086/279591
   Grytnes JA, 2014, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V23, P876, DOI 10.1111/geb.12170
   HEATWOLE H, 1969, Journal of Herpetology, V3, P65, DOI 10.2307/1563225
   Holmes MW, 2016, MOL ECOL, V25, P864, DOI 10.1111/mec.13529
   HUNTLEY B, 1993, J BIOGEOGR, V20, P163, DOI 10.2307/2845669
   James SA, 2018, APPL PLANT SCI, V6, DOI 10.1002/aps3.1024
   [贾彦龙 Jia Yanlong], 2019, [中国科学数据, China Scientific Data], V4, P1
   Küchler M, 2015, ANN FOREST SCI, V72, DOI 10.1007/s13595-014-0409-x
   LANDE R, 1993, AM NAT, V142, P911, DOI 10.1086/285580
   Lenoir, 2013, Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, P599, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-384719-5.00375-0, 10.1016/b978-0-12-384719-5.00375-0]
   Lenoir J, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P1768, DOI 10.1126/science.1156831
   Lenoir J, 2015, ECOGRAPHY, V38, P15, DOI 10.1111/ecog.00967
   Lenoir J, 2020, NAT ECOL EVOL, V4, P1044, DOI 10.1038/s41559-020-1198-2
   Lenoir J, 2010, ECOGRAPHY, V33, P295, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06279.x
   Li DJ, 2017, NEW PHYTOL, V214, P607, DOI 10.1111/nph.14397
   Liang EY, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P4380, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1520582113
   López-Pujol J, 2011, MT RES DEV, V31, P261, DOI 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00058.1
   Losos JB, 2011, AM NAT, V177, P709, DOI 10.1086/660020
   Maggini R, 2011, ECOL MODEL, V222, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.09.010
   Mamantov MA, 2021, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V30, P784, DOI 10.1111/geb.13246
   Matteodo M, 2016, ECOL EVOL, V6, P6969, DOI 10.1002/ece3.2354
   Moritz C, 2008, SCIENCE, V322, P261, DOI 10.1126/science.1163428
   Myers N, 2000, NATURE, V403, P853, DOI 10.1038/35002501
   Nogués-Bravo D, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P420, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.007
   O'Sullivan KSW, 2021, ECOGRAPHY, V44, P112, DOI 10.1111/ecog.05334
   Page LM, 2015, BIOSCIENCE, V65, P841, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biv104
   Parmesan C, 2003, NATURE, V421, P37, DOI 10.1038/nature01286
   Pecl GT, 2017, SCIENCE, V355, DOI 10.1126/science.aai9214
   Pepin N, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P424, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2563, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2563]
   R Core Team, 2019, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
   Rabasa SG, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P2490, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12220
   Rumpf SB, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-12343-x
   Rumpf SB, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P1848, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1713936115
   Sandel B, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P660, DOI 10.1126/science.1210173
   Scherrer D, 2011, J BIOGEOGR, V38, P406, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02407.x
   Shi H, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V706, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135718
   Shrestha N, 2018, J BIOGEOGR, V45, P438, DOI 10.1111/jbi.13136
   Smith MA, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P12337, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1817774115
   Stewart JR, 2010, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V277, P661, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2009.1272
   Telwala Y, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0057103
   Vitasse Y, 2021, BIOL REV, V96, P1816, DOI 10.1111/brv.12727
   Wang SP, 2010, CHINESE SCI BULL, V55, P1968, DOI 10.1007/s11434-010-3236-y
   Wang XP., 2004, Biodiversity Science, V12, P206, DOI [10.17520/biods.2004025, DOI 10.17520/BIODS.2004025]
   Wang YY, 2020, FRONT PLANT SCI, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2020.01222
   Wen ZX, 2017, BMC ECOL, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12898-017-0128-x
   Wu YJ, 2013, ECOGRAPHY, V36, P185, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07132.x
   Yang WJ, 2014, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V23, P1284, DOI 10.1111/geb.12225
   Yao YH, 2015, INT J CLIMATOL, V35, P1833, DOI 10.1002/joc.4123
   Zellweger F, 2019, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V34, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2018.12.012
   Zhang XH, 2021, J GEOGR SCI, V31, P350, DOI 10.1007/s11442-021-1840-1
   Zhao F, 2014, J GEOGR SCI, V24, P226, DOI 10.1007/s11442-014-1084-4
   Zu KL, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V783, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146896
NR 67
TC 10
Z9 12
U1 18
U2 66
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1466-822X
EI 1466-8238
J9 GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR
JI Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.
PD JUL
PY 2023
VL 32
IS 7
BP 1098
EP 1112
DI 10.1111/geb.13692
EA MAY 2023
PG 15
WC Ecology; Geography, Physical
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Physical Geography
GA AX3N7
UT WOS:000981396600001
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Basel, B
   Hoogesteger, J
   Hellegers, P
AF Basel, Britt
   Hoogesteger, Jaime
   Hellegers, Petra
TI Promise and paradox: A critical sociohydrological perspective on
   small-scale managed aquifer recharge
SO FRONTIERS IN WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE managed aquifer recharge (MAR); water sowing and harvesting; groundwater
   recharge; sociohydrology; community-based adaptation; Nature-based
   Solution; climate adaptation; drought risk reduction
ID SOCIO-HYDROLOGY; HYDROSOCIAL TERRITORIES; WATER STRUGGLES; GROUNDWATER
   USE; RIVER-BASIN; FRAMEWORK; RESILIENCE; CLIMATE; INFRASTRUCTURE;
   SUSTAINABILITY
AB Small-scale managed aquifer recharge (MAR) has significant potential as a bottom-up, community-based adaptation solution for increasing local groundwater availability and reducing the experience of drought for small-holder agriculturalists and rural populations. Using a suite of low-tech and low-cost techniques, small-scale MAR increases the infiltration of surface water runoff to replenish groundwater and deliver a suite of societal and ecosystem benefits. While the technique is hydrologically promising, populations may not act, implementation may not be permitted, interventions may not be effective for the population in question, or unexpected consequences (paradoxes) may result. For small-scale MAR to effectively reduce the experience of drought, it is imperative to unravel how such interventions play out within the complexity of the sociohydrological system in which they are implemented. Building on previous conceptualizations of the sociohydrological system, we apply the lens of political ecology to conceptualize the interplay between biophysical, climate, and social systems. Additionally, we explore considerations, feedbacks, and potential paradoxes in the uptake, implementation, and effectiveness of small-scale MAR interventions. We show that within the parameters of climate trends, small-scale MAR may serve to increase the functionality of ecosystems and reduce the impact of climate extremes, while protecting livelihoods and supporting society. In a positive feedback loop, small-scale MAR may both reduce the likelihood of experiencing drought while simultaneously increasing the ability and likelihood of the population to cope with or further avoid drought. Paradoxes and negative feedback processes, however, must be avoided. Specific factors, and how such factors interplay, will be different in each context where small-scale MAR is implemented. Conceptualizing the sociohydrological system in which small-scale MAR is implemented, including explicitly accounting for climate trends and using a power-sensitive approach, allows us to avoid overestimating or oversimplifying small-scale MAR as a solution, while supporting practical and effective implementation.
C1 [Basel, Britt] Ecothropic, Cimarron, CO 81220 USA.
   [Basel, Britt] Ecothrop Mexico AC, San Cristobal De Las Casa, Mexico.
   [Basel, Britt; Hoogesteger, Jaime; Hellegers, Petra] Wageningen Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Water Resources Management Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands.
C3 Wageningen University & Research
RP Basel, B (corresponding author), Ecothropic, Cimarron, CO 81220 USA.; Basel, B (corresponding author), Ecothrop Mexico AC, San Cristobal De Las Casa, Mexico.; Basel, B (corresponding author), Wageningen Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Water Resources Management Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands.
EM brittbasel@ecothropic.com
RI Hoogesteger, Jaime/A-4506-2015
CR [Anonymous], 2013, EMERGING APPROACHES, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-384703-4.00505-0, 10.1016/B978-0-12-384703-4.00505-0]
   Basel B, 2021, CLIM DEV, V13, P792, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2020.1855100
   Basel B, 2020, MAR POLLUT BULL, V156, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111266
   Bebbington A., 1996, Liberation ecologies: environment, development, social movements., P86
   Benford RD, 2000, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V26, P611, DOI 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Berkes F., 2010, Etudes/Inuit Studies, V34, P109, DOI DOI 10.7202/045407AR
   Biggs R, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P421, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
   Boelens R, 2016, WATER INT, V41, P1, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2016.1134898
   Boelens R, 2015, GEOFORUM, V64, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.07.005
   Boelens R, 2014, GEOFORUM, V57, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.02.008
   Boelens R, 2009, DEV CHANGE, V40, P307, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01516.x
   Bohensky E.L., 2015, Principles for building resilience: Sustaining ecosystem services in social-ecological systems, P142
   Boillat S, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05894-180421
   Clark WC, 2020, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V45, P331, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-012420-043621
   Cleaver Frances., 2018, Water Justice, P246, DOI [10.1017/9781316831847.016, DOI 10.1017/9781316831847.016]
   Cohen-Shacham E., 2016, NATURE BASED SOLUTIO, V97, P2016
   Cruz-Ayala MB, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12020474
   Dell'Angelo J, 2018, ECOL ECON, V143, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.033
   Di Baldassarre G, 2013, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V17, P3295, DOI 10.5194/hess-17-3295-2013
   Di Baldassarre G, 2019, WATER RESOUR RES, V55, P6327, DOI 10.1029/2018WR023901
   Di Baldassarre G, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P305, DOI 10.1002/2017EF000764
   Di Baldassarre G, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P4770, DOI 10.1002/2014WR016416
   Dillon P, 2019, HYDROGEOL J, V27, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10040-018-1841-z
   Dupuits E, 2020, ECOL ECON, V172, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106625
   Elshafei Y, 2014, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V18, P2141, DOI 10.5194/hess-18-2141-2014
   Feindt P.H., 2005, J ENV POLICY PLANNIN, V7, P161, DOI [DOI 10.1080/15239080500339638, https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339638]
   Gleick PH, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P11155, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1004812107
   Guyennon N, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9090689
   Hale RL, 2015, EARTHS FUTURE, V3, P110, DOI 10.1002/2014EF000295
   Hall RebeccaJane., 2015, STUD POLIT ECON, V96, P23, DOI DOI 10.1080/19187033.2015.11674936
   Haugaard M, 2012, J POLITICAL POWER, V5, P33, DOI 10.1080/2158379X.2012.660810
   Hommes L, 2019, WATER INT, V44, P81, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2019.1583311
   Hommes L, 2017, POLIT GEOGR, V57, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.12.002
   Hoogesteger J, 2022, CURR OPIN ENV SCI HL, V27, DOI 10.1016/j.coesh.2022.100341
   Hoogesteger J, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V77, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.002
   Hoogesteger J, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V51, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.004
   Hoogesteger J, 2015, GEOFORUM, V62, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.013
   Hoogesteger J, 2015, INT J COMMONS, V9, P398, DOI 10.18352/ijc.521
   Hulme M, 2011, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V1, P177, DOI 10.1038/nclimate1150
   International Groundwater Assessment Centre, 2020, MANAGED AQUIFER RECH
   Cisneros BEJ, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P229
   Kallis G, 2010, ECOL ECON, V69, P796, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.025
   Kandasamy J, 2014, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V18, P1027, DOI 10.5194/hess-18-1027-2014
   Kates RW, 2006, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V103, P14653, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0605726103
   KENNEDY D, 1995, J FIELD ARCHAEOL, V22, P275, DOI 10.1179/009346995791974198
   Keune J, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V121, P13301, DOI 10.1002/2016JD025426
   Kuil L, 2016, WATER RESOUR RES, V52, P6222, DOI 10.1002/2015WR018298
   Kumar P, 2020, PROG DISASTER SCI, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100134
   Lasage R, 2015, J ARID ENVIRON, V118, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.02.019
   Lasage R, 2015, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V20, P317, DOI 10.1007/s11027-013-9493-8
   Linton J, 2014, GEOFORUM, V57, P170, DOI [10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.08.003, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.008]
   Madani K, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12071941
   Malik RPS, 2014, AGR WATER MANAGE, V131, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2013.07.002
   Mao F, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P3655, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-3655-2017
   Masson-Delmotte V., Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
   Mehta L., 2012, Water Alternatives, V5, P193
   Melsen LA, 2018, HYDROLOG SCI J, V63, P1435, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2018.1499025
   Molle F., 2009, Water Alternatives, V2, P328
   Molle F, 2010, AGR WATER MANAGE, V97, P569, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.01.004
   Molle F, 2009, NAT RESOUR FORUM, V33, P6, DOI 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2009.01204.x
   Ochoa-Tocachi BF, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P584, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0307-1
   Olson M., 1965, LOGIC COLLECTIVE ACT, V124
   Ostrom E., 1990, GOVERNING COMMONS EV
   Ostrom E, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P15176, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701886104
   Ostrom E, 2009, SCIENCE, V325, P419, DOI 10.1126/science.1172133
   Ostrom Elinor., 2000, SWISS POLIT SCI REV, V6, P29, DOI [DOI 10.1002/J.1662-6370.2000.TB00285.X, 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2000.tb00285.x]
   Otieno VO, 2012, CLIM RES, V52, P77, DOI 10.3354/cr01050
   Pande S, 2017, WIRES WATER, V4, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1193
   Pandey DN, 2003, CURR SCI INDIA, V85, P46
   Patel N.G., 2012, PARIPEX IND J RES, V3, P215, DOI [10.15373/22501991/July2014/83, DOI 10.15373/22501991/JULY2014/83]
   Penny G., 2018, Journal of Water Security, V4-5, P37, DOI [10.1016/j.wasec.2018.11.003, DOI 10.1016/J.WASEC.2018.11.003]
   Reid H, 2016, CLIM DEV, V8, P4, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2015.1034233
   Renganayaki SP., 2013, Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol, V2, P416, DOI 10.15623/ijret.2013.0204002
   Ribeiro L., 2020, EGU2020 5959, DOI [10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-5959, DOI 10.5194/EGUSPHERE-EGU2020-5959]
   Neto AR, 2014, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V18, P3449, DOI 10.5194/hess-18-3449-2014
   Robbins P., 2012, Political ecology: A critical introduction, V2nd
   Rockström J, 2014, ECOHYDROLOGY, V7, P1249, DOI 10.1002/eco.1562
   Roobavannan M, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P8344, DOI 10.1002/2017WR020671
   Ross A, 2020, HYDROLOG SCI J, V65, P1443, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2020.1761023
   Rusca M, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11101973
   Sadoff CWCW, 2015, Securing water, sustaining growth: report of the GWP/OECD Task Force on Water Security and Sustainable Growth, V180
   Savelli E, 2021, J HYDROL, V594, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125953
   Seddon N, 2020, PHILOS T R SOC B, V375, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2019.0120
   Shah T, 2009, ENVIRON RES LETT, V4, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/035005
   Sivapalan M, 2014, EARTHS FUTURE, V2, P225, DOI 10.1002/2013EF000164
   Steenbergen F., 2010, MANAGING WATER BUFFE
   Steins NA, 1999, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V12, P539, DOI 10.1080/089419299279434
   Trawick P, 2003, WORLD DEV, V31, P977, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00049-4
   Vanelli FM, 2021, HYDROLOG SCI J, V66, P1758, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2021.1967356
   Viglione A, 2014, J HYDROL, V518, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.018
   Vos J., 2018, WATER JUSTICE, P283, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781316831847.019
   Vos J, 2020, ECOL ECON, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106651
   Wesselink A, 2017, WIRES WATER, V4, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1196
   Zwarteveen M, 2017, WIRES WATER, V4, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1245
   Zwarteveen MZ, 2014, WATER INT, V39, P143, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2014.891168
NR 95
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 1
U2 12
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2624-9375
J9 FRONT WATER
JI Front. Water
PD NOV 25
PY 2022
VL 4
AR 1002721
DI 10.3389/frwa.2022.1002721
PG 14
WC Water Resources
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Water Resources
GA 6U3YQ
UT WOS:000894305300001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Queirós, AM
   Talbot, E
   Beaumont, NJ
   Somerfield, PJ
   Kay, S
   Pascoe, C
   Dedman, S
   Fernandes, JA
   Jueterbock, A
   Miller, PI
   Sailley, SF
   Sará, G
   Carr, LM
   Austen, MC
   Widdicombe, S
   Rilov, G
   Levin, LA
   Hull, SC
   Walmsley, SF
   Aonghusa, CN
AF Queiros, Ana M.
   Talbot, Elizabeth
   Beaumont, Nicola J.
   Somerfield, Paul J.
   Kay, Susan
   Pascoe, Christine
   Dedman, Simon
   Fernandes, Jose A.
   Jueterbock, Alexander
   Miller, Peter I.
   Sailley, Sevrine F.
   Sara, Ginaluca
   Carr, Liam M.
   Austen, Melanie C.
   Widdicombe, Steve
   Rilov, Gil
   Levin, Lisa A.
   Hull, Stephen C.
   Walmsley, Suzannah F.
   Nic Aonghusa, Caitriona
TI Bright spots as climate-smart marine spatial planning tools for
   conservation and blue growth
SO GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptation; blue carbon; climate change; fisheries; marine protected
   area; marine spatial planning; mitigation; nature-based solutions
ID OCEAN; PROTECTION; BENEFITS; TRACKING; FARMS
AB Marine spatial planning that addresses ocean climate-driven change ('climate-smart MSP') is a global aspiration to support economic growth, food security and ecosystem sustainability. Ocean climate change ('CC') modelling may become a key decision-support tool for MSP, but traditional modelling analysis and communication challenges prevent their broad uptake. We employed MSP-specific ocean climate modelling analyses to inform a real-life MSP process; addressing how nature conservation and fisheries could be adapted to CC. We found that the currently planned distribution of these activities may become unsustainable during the policy's implementation due to CC, leading to a shortfall in its sustainability and blue growth targets. Significant, climate-driven ecosystem-level shifts in ocean components underpinning designated sites and fishing activity were estimated, reflecting different magnitudes of shifts in benthic versus pelagic, and inshore versus offshore habitats. Supporting adaptation, we then identified: CC refugia (areas where the ecosystem remains within the boundaries of its present state); CC hotspots (where climate drives the ecosystem towards a new state, inconsistent with each sectors' present use distribution); and for the first time, identified bright spots (areas where oceanographic processes drive range expansion opportunities that may support sustainable growth in the medium term). We thus create the means to: identify where sector-relevant ecosystem change is attributable to CC; incorporate resilient delivery of conservation and sustainable ecosystem management aims into MSP; and to harness opportunities for blue growth where they exist. Capturing CC bright spots alongside refugia within protected areas may present important opportunities to meet sustainability targets while helping support the fishing sector in a changing climate. By capitalizing on the natural distribution of climate resilience within ocean ecosystems, such climate-adaptive spatial management strategies could be seen as nature-based solutions to limit the impact of CC on ocean ecosystems and dependent blue economy sectors, paving the way for climate-smart MSP.
C1 [Queiros, Ana M.; Talbot, Elizabeth; Beaumont, Nicola J.; Somerfield, Paul J.; Kay, Susan; Pascoe, Christine; Miller, Peter I.; Sailley, Sevrine F.; Austen, Melanie C.; Widdicombe, Steve] Plymouth Marine Lab, Plymouth, Devon, England.
   [Dedman, Simon] Stanford Univ, Hopkins Marine Stn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
   [Fernandes, Jose A.] Basque Res & Technol Alliance BRTA, AZTI Tecnalia, Marine Res, Bizkaia, Spain.
   [Jueterbock, Alexander] Nord Univ, Fac Biosci & Aquaculture, Bodo, Norway.
   [Sara, Ginaluca] Univ Palermo, Dept Earth & Marine Sci, Ecol Lab, Palermo, Italy.
   [Carr, Liam M.] Natl Univ Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
   [Austen, Melanie C.] Univ Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, England.
   [Rilov, Gil] Israel Oceanog & Limnol Res, Nat Inst Oceanog, Haifa, Israel.
   [Levin, Lisa A.] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, San Diego, CA 92103 USA.
   [Hull, Stephen C.; Walmsley, Suzannah F.] ABPmer, Southampton, Hants, England.
   [Nic Aonghusa, Caitriona] Inst Marine, Oranmore, Ireland.
C3 Plymouth Marine Laboratory; Stanford University; AZTI; Nord University;
   University of Palermo; Ollscoil na Gaillimhe-University of Galway;
   University of Plymouth; Israel Oceanographic & Limnological Research
   Institute; University of California System; University of California San
   Diego; Scripps Institution of Oceanography; Marine Institute Ireland
RP Queirós, AM (corresponding author), Plymouth Marine Lab, Plymouth, Devon, England.
EM anqu@pml.ac.uk
RI Somerfield, Paul/J-9189-2014; Talbot, Elizabeth/KPB-7398-2024; Miller,
   Peter/E-4525-2013; Dedman, Simon/E-9668-2017; Kay, Susan/C-5659-2008;
   Jueterbock, Alexander/Q-8639-2018; Salvador, Jose/AAH-7939-2019; Levin,
   Lisa/KFQ-2165-2024; Beaumont, Nicola/AAS-2780-2020; Austen,
   Melanie/GLU-1418-2022
OI Austen, Melanie/0000-0001-8133-0498; Carr, Liam/0000-0002-6514-5433;
   Rilov, Gil/0000-0002-1334-4887; Fernandes Salvador, Jose
   Antonio/0000-0003-4677-6077; Queiros, Ana/0000-0002-7067-3177; Talbot,
   Elizabeth/0000-0002-5046-5143; Beaumont, Nicola/0000-0002-5976-9661;
   Dedman, Simon/0000-0002-9108-972X; Kay, Susan/0000-0003-1510-8578
FU Irish Government; COPERNICUS [2018/C3S_422_Lot2_PML]; Global Challenges
   Research Fund [NE/P021050/1, NE/P021107/1]; European Maritime Fisheries
   Fund [SERV-18-OSIS-002]; European Union's Horizon 2020 [869300]; NERC
   [pml010010, NE/P021107/2, NE/P021050/2, NE/P021107/1, NE/P021050/1,
   NE/R015953/1] Funding Source: UKRI; UKRI [NE/V016725/1, NE/V016660/1]
   Funding Source: UKRI
FX Irish Government; COPERNICUS, Grant/Award Number: 2018/C3S_422_Lot2_PML;
   Global Challenges Research Fund, Grant/Award Number: NE/P021050/1 and
   NE/P021107/1; European Maritime & Fisheries Fund, Grant/Award Number:
   SERV-18-OSIS-002; European Union's Horizon 2020, Grant/Award Number:
   869300
CR Agardy T., 2010, Ocean zoning-Making marine management more effective, DOI [10.4324/9781849776462, DOI 10.4324/9781849776462]
   [Anonymous], 2019, FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department - Yearbook of Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics
   Bates AE, 2018, NATURE, V560, P299, DOI 10.1038/d41586-018-05869-5
   Beukers-Stewart BD, 2005, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V298, P189, DOI 10.3354/meps298189
   Bindoff N. L., 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, P447, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781009157964.007, 10.1017/9781009157964.007]
   Block BA, 2011, NATURE, V475, P86, DOI 10.1038/nature10082
   Borenstein M., 2021, Introduction to meta-analysis
   Calosi P, 2013, INTEGR COMP BIOL, V53, P660, DOI 10.1093/icb/ict041
   Cheung WWL, 2012, AQUAT CONSERV, V22, P368, DOI 10.1002/aqc.2248
   Craig RK, 2012, HARVARD ENVIRON LAW, V36, P305
   DERSIMONIAN R, 1986, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V7, P177, DOI 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
   Ehler C., 2009, IOC MANUAL GUIDES
   European Commission, 2021, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Europes Media in the Digital Decade: An Action Plan to Support Recovery and Transformation
   Fernández PA, 2019, PHYCOLOGIA, V58, P542, DOI 10.1080/00318884.2019.1628576
   Foden J, 2011, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V428, P33, DOI 10.3354/meps09064
   Santos CF, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P505, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-0513-x
   Gallo ND, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P833, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3422, 10.1038/nclimate3422]
   Gissi E, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V92, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.002
   Hale R, 2017, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V135, P121, DOI 10.1007/s10533-017-0350-9
   Halpern BS, 2012, NATURE, V488, P615, DOI 10.1038/nature11397
   Hausfather Z, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P27791, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2017124117
   Hawkins E, 2012, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V39, DOI 10.1029/2011GL050087
   Hedges LV., 1982, Statistical Methodology in Meta-Analysis
   Hiddink JG, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P117, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12726
   Hoegh-Guldberg O., 2019, OCEAN SOLUTION CLIMA, V112
   Hoegh-Guldberg O, 2019, SCIENCE, V365, P1372, DOI 10.1126/science.aaz4390
   International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2016, WCC2016RES050EN
   Irish Government, 2017, MAR SPAT PLAN IR ROA, P20
   Irish Government, 2019, BIOD CLIM CHANG SECT, P84
   Irish Government, 2019, NAT MAR PLANN FRAM C, P200
   Irish Government, 2018, NAT MAR PLANN FRAM B, P107
   IUCN, 2020, Guidance for using the IUCN Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions, Vfirst, DOI [DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.09.EN, 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.09.en]
   Johnson DE, 2019, CONSERV LETT, V12, DOI 10.1111/conl.12634
   Kapsenberg L, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P3201, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14730
   Levin LA, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P4664, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15223
   Lotze HK, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P12907, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1900194116
   Lubchenco J, 2015, SCIENCE, V350, P382, DOI 10.1126/science.aad5443
   McCarthy GD, 2015, WEATHER, V70, P242, DOI 10.1002/wea.2543
   McCarthy G.D., 2017, Marine Climate Change Impacts Partnership: MCCIP Science Review 2017, P15, DOI DOI 10.14465/2017.ARC10.002-ATL
   Miller P.I., 2020, OCEAN FRONTS DATA NW
   Molinos JG, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P83, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2769
   Palacios DM, 2013, ENDANGER SPECIES RES, V22, P191, DOI 10.3354/esr00558
   Payne MR, 2016, ICES J MAR SCI, V73, P1272, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsv231
   Pinarbasi K, 2017, MAR POLICY, V83, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.031
   Pinsky ML, 2021, POPUL ECOL, V63, P17, DOI 10.1002/1438-390X.12050
   Pinsky ML, 2020, ANNU REV MAR SCI, V12, P153, DOI 10.1146/annurev-marine-010419-010916
   Popova E, 2019, MAR POLICY, V104, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.02.050
   Portner H.O., 2019, INTERGOV PANEL CLIM, P1
   Pournelle G. H., 1953, Journal of Mammalogy, V34, P133
   Queiros A., 2020, SPATIAL DATA EVIDENC, P231
   Queirós AM, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P3927, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13423
   Queirós AM, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P130, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12675
   Queirós AM, 2019, ECOL MONOGR, V89, DOI 10.1002/ecm.1366
   Rilov G, 2020, ECOL APPL, V30, DOI 10.1002/eap.2009
   Rilov G, 2019, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V17, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00566
   Ryabinin V, 2019, FRONT MAR SCI, V6, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2019.00470
   Sarà G, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P3654, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14296
   Schwalm CR, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P19656, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2007117117
   Seddon N, 2021, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V27, P1518, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15513
   Silber GK, 2017, FRONT MAR SCI, V4, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2017.00413
   Snelgrove PVR, 2018, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V33, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.004
   Stelzenmüller V, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V776, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145918
   Stocker TF, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1, DOI 10.1017/cbo9781107415324
   Tittensor DP, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aay9969
   van Vuuren DP, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P5, DOI [10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z, 10.1007/s10584-011-0157-y]
   Vedor M, 2021, ELIFE, V10, DOI [10.77554/eLife.62508, 10.7554/eLife.62508]
   Wilson KL, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P3251, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15094
NR 67
TC 33
Z9 37
U1 5
U2 73
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1354-1013
EI 1365-2486
J9 GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL
JI Glob. Change Biol.
PD NOV
PY 2021
VL 27
IS 21
BP 5514
EP 5531
DI 10.1111/gcb.15827
EA SEP 2021
PG 18
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA WB7XK
UT WOS:000692752800001
PM 34486773
OA Green Published, hybrid, Green Accepted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Giannoulis, KD
   Skoufogianni, E
   Bartzialis, D
   Solomou, AD
   Danalatos, NG
AF Giannoulis, Kyriakos D.
   Skoufogianni, Elpiniki
   Bartzialis, Dimitrios
   Solomou, Alexandra D.
   Danalatos, Nicholaos G.
TI Growth and productivity of <i>Salvia officinalis</i> L. under
   Mediterranean climatic conditions depends on biofertilizer, nitrogen
   fertilization, and sowing density
SO INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
LA English
DT Article
DE Salvia officinalis; Mycorrhizae; N-fertilization; Yield;
   Aromatic-medicinal plants
ID ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI; ESSENTIAL OIL PRODUCTION;
   ROSMARINUS-OFFICINALIS; PHOSPHORUS UPTAKE; PLANT-GROWTH; WATER-STRESS;
   YIELD; ROSEMARY; QUALITY
AB Salvia officinalis L. is an important medicinal herb of high soil and climatic adaptability and thus the main goal of the current study is to investigate the effect of mycorrhizae, the plant density and the nitrogen fertilization (using bio-fertilizers) on the yield and growth characteristics. For the purpose of the study, a field experiment was established at the Experimental Farm of the University of Thessaly, Velestino, in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. The experimental design was a factorial split-split-plot design with Mico-plus being the main factor (Trt(1): control, Trt(2): mico-plus which contains non composed plant residues, 3% Glomus mosseae and Glomus intradices, 1 x 10(8)UFC/g Bacillus spp, Pseudomonas spp., and Streptomyces spp., and 1 x 10(8)UFC/g Trichoderma), plant density the sub-factor (P-1: 10,000 and P-2: 20,000 plants ha(-1)) and N-fertilization the sub-sub factor using bio-fertilizers (N-1: 0, N-2: 40, and N-3: 80 kg N ha(-1)) with three replicates. Height, leaf area index and leaf yield were measured by samplings at the ideal collection stage (start of the flowering period). The use of mico-plus and nitrogen fertilization resulted in significantly higher yield. Furthermore, plant density had a negative effect on measured values, leading to reduced leaf yield and lower leaf area. The higher produced leaf yield and leaf area (7296 kg ha(-1) and 4.47 leaf area index, respectively) were recorded in the third year for the treatment of the lower plant density with the higher N-dressing where mico-plus was used (MP1N3). Therefore, sage seems to be a promising perennial cultivation characterized by satisfactory yields under low inputs in similar soil-climatic environment, while the use of mico-plus should be taken into consideration, especially in the case of poor and abandoned lands.
C1 [Giannoulis, Kyriakos D.; Skoufogianni, Elpiniki; Bartzialis, Dimitrios; Danalatos, Nicholaos G.] Univ Thessaly, Dept Agr Crop Prod & Rural Environm, Fytocou Str, Volos 38446, Greece.
   [Solomou, Alexandra D.] Hellen Agr Org DEMETER, Inst Mediterranean & Forest Ecosyst, N Chlorou 1, Athens 11528, Greece.
C3 University of Thessaly
RP Giannoulis, KD (corresponding author), Univ Thessaly, Dept Agr Crop Prod & Rural Environm, Fytocou Str, Volos 38446, Greece.
EM kgiannoulis@uth.gr
RI Giannoulis, Kyriakos/ABC-8947-2021; Solomou, Alexandra/C-1428-2018
OI Giannoulis, Kyriakos/0000-0001-6579-8023; SOLOMOU, Dr.
   ALEXANDRA/0000-0002-0014-1909
FU Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment,
   University of Thessaly, Greece
FX This work was supported by the Department of Agriculture, Crop
   Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, Greece.
CR Altindal D., 2016, ESSENTIAL OILS FOOD, P715
   Aslani Z., 2014, Journal of Medicinal Plants and By-Products, V3, P147
   Avato P, 2005, PLANT SCI, V169, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.02.004
   Bagyaraj D. J., 2000, MICROBIAL BIOTECHNOL, P43
   Bagyaraj DJ, 1995, ADV MICROB ECOL, V14, P119
   Baher ZF, 2002, FLAVOUR FRAG J, V17, P275, DOI 10.1002/ffj.1097
   Bahreininejad B, 2013, INT J PLANT PROD, V7, P151
   Beadle C.L., 1987, Techniques in Bio-productivity and Photosynthesis and Photosynthesis, V2nd, P21
   Bochicchio R, 2015, ITAL J AGRON, V10, P163, DOI 10.4081/ija.2015.640
   Bozin B, 2007, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V55, P7879, DOI 10.1021/jf0715323
   Bücking H, 2015, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V5, P587, DOI 10.3390/agronomy5040587
   Ceylan A., 1994, AGRONOMY REPORTS, V1
   Copetta A, 2006, MYCORRHIZA, V16, P485, DOI 10.1007/s00572-006-0065-6
   Danalatos N G., 2007, Proceedings of the 15th European Biomass Conference, P421
   De Mastro G, 2006, ACTA HORTIC, P233, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.723.29
   Ekren S, 2012, AGR WATER MANAGE, V109, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.03.004
   Farahani H., 2009, J. of Horticulture and Forestry, V1, P86
   Fathi T., 2012, Annals of Biological Research, V3, P3346
   Geneva MP, 2010, J SCI FOOD AGR, V90, P696, DOI 10.1002/jsfa.3871
   Giannoulis K.D., 2008, INT C AGR ENG IND EX, P14
   Gosling P, 2006, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V113, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2005.09.009
   Govahi M, 2015, IND CROP PROD, V74, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.04.053
   Grdisa Martina, 2015, Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, V80, P69
   Helgason Thorunn, 2005, Mycologist, V19, P96, DOI 10.1017/S0269915X05003022
   Ho CT, 2000, BIOFACTORS, V13, P161, DOI 10.1002/biof.5520130126
   Horiuchi K, 2007, BIOL PHARM BULL, V30, P1147, DOI 10.1248/bpb.30.1147
   Kazimierczak R, 2015, BIOL AGRIC HORTIC, V31, P118, DOI 10.1080/01448765.2014.977948
   Khaosaad T, 2006, MYCORRHIZA, V16, P443, DOI 10.1007/s00572-006-0062-9
   Koc H., 2000, J AGR FACULTY GAZIOS, V17, P89
   Laborda R, 2013, IND CROP PROD, V48, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.04.011
   Liu JN, 2007, PLANT GROWTH REGUL, V52, P29, DOI 10.1007/s10725-007-9174-2
   Lu YR, 2001, FOOD CHEM, V75, P197, DOI 10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00198-4
   Maric S, 2006, J ESSENT OIL RES, V18, P178, DOI 10.1080/10412905.2006.9699060
   Marquard R., 2001, ANBAU QUALITATSANFOR
   Miransari M., 2014, Use of Microbes for the Alleviation of Soil Stresses, P165, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4939-0721-2_10, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0721-2_10]
   Mona Y. K., 2008, Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, V4, P34
   Morone-Fortunato I, 2008, PLANT CELL TISS ORG, V93, P139, DOI 10.1007/s11240-008-9353-5
   Ozturk A, 2004, PAKISTAN J BOT, V36, P787
   Perry NSL, 2003, PHARMACOL BIOCHEM BE, V75, P651, DOI 10.1016/S0091-3057(03)00108-4
   Piccaglia R., 1997, Journal of Essential Oil Research, V9, P187
   Rasouli-Sadaghiani M, 2010, J MED PLANTS RES, V4, P2222
   Schnepf A, 2011, B MATH BIOL, V73, P2175, DOI 10.1007/s11538-010-9617-1
   Seidler-Lozykowska K, 2015, BIOL AGRIC HORTIC, V31, P53, DOI 10.1080/01448765.2014.966323
   Sharif M, 2011, PEDOSPHERE, V21, P502, DOI 10.1016/S1002-0160(11)60152-5
   Skoufogianni E., 2017, Glob. Adv. Res. J. Agric. Sci, V6, P449
   Smith S., 1997, MYCORRHIZAL SYMBIOSI, P147
   Sonmez C, 2017, TURK J FIELD CROPS, V22, P96, DOI 10.17557/tjfc.311012
   Steel R.G.D., 1982, PRINCIPLES PROCEDURE
   Tarraf W, 2017, IND CROP PROD, V102, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.03.010
   Tarraf W, 2015, ITAL J AGRON, V10, P160, DOI 10.4081/ija.2015.633
   USDA, 1975, USDA AGR HDB
   Vinutha, 2005, THESIS
   Wogiatzi-Kamwoukou E., 2017, J FOOD SCI ENG, V7, P141, DOI [10.17265/2159-5828/2017.03.004., DOI 10.17265/2159-5828/2017.03.004]
   Yang Y, 2017, APPL SCI-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/app7010068
   Zhang HH, 2018, FRONT PLANT SCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.01156
   Zolfaghari M., 2013, Iranian journal of plant physiology, V3, P643
   Zutic I., 2003, Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants, V10, P49, DOI 10.1300/J044v10n04_06
NR 57
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 3
U2 33
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0926-6690
EI 1872-633X
J9 IND CROP PROD
JI Ind. Crop. Prod.
PD FEB
PY 2021
VL 160
AR 113136
DI 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113136
EA JAN 2021
PG 6
WC Agricultural Engineering; Agronomy
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA QA0SP
UT WOS:000613162000010
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Walsh, ES
   Hudiburg, T
AF Walsh, Eric S.
   Hudiburg, Tara
TI An integration framework for linking avifauna niche and forest landscape
   models
SO PLOS ONE
LA English
DT Article
ID SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FLAMMULATED-OWLS; HABITAT
   SUITABILITY; CARBON DYNAMICS; FIRE EXCLUSION; HOME-RANGE; NEST WEBS;
   TRANSFERABILITY; SIMULATION
AB Avian cavity nesters (ACN) are viable indicators of forest structure, composition, and diversity. Utilizing these species responses in multi-disciplinary climate-avian-forest modeling can improve climate adaptive management. We propose a framework for integrating and evaluating climate-avian-forest models by linking two ACN niche models with a forest landscape model (FLM), LANDIS-II. The framework facilitates the selection of available ACN models for integration, evaluation of model transferability, and evaluation of successful integration of ACN models with a FLM. We found selecting a model for integration depended on its transferability to the study area (Northern Rockies Ecoregion of Idaho in the United States), which limited the species and model types available for transfer. However, transfer evaluation of the tested ACN models indicated a good fit for the study area. Several niche model variables (canopy cover, snag density, and forest cover type) were not directly informed by the LANDIS-II model, which required secondary modeling (Random Forest) to derive values from the FLM outputs. In instances where the Random Forest models performed with a moderate classification accuracy, the overall effect on niche predictions was negligible. Predictions based on LANDIS-II simulations performed similarly to predictions based on the niche model's original training input types. This supported the conclusion that the proposed framework is viable for informing avian niche models with FLM simulations. Even models that poorly approximate habitat suitability, due to the inherent constraints of predicting spatial niche use of irruptive species produced informative results by identifying areas of management focus. This is primarily because LANDIS-II estimates spatially explicit variables that were unavailable over large spatial extents from alternative datasets. Thus, without integration, one of the ACN niche models was not applicable to the study area. The framework will be useful for integrating avifauna niche and forest ecosystem models, which can inform management of contemporary and future landscapes under differing management and climate scenarios.
C1 [Walsh, Eric S.; Hudiburg, Tara] Univ Idaho, Dept Forest Rangeland & Fire Sci, Moscow, ID 83843 USA.
C3 University of Idaho
RP Walsh, ES (corresponding author), Univ Idaho, Dept Forest Rangeland & Fire Sci, Moscow, ID 83843 USA.
EM wals0292@vandals.uidaho.edu
RI Hudiburg, Tara/AAG-3134-2019; Walsh, Eric/ABH-5950-2020
OI Hudiburg, Tara/0000-0003-4422-1510; Walsh, Eric/0000-0003-0077-3639
FU National Science Foundation [DEB-1553049]; USDA NIFA McIntire-Stennis
   project [1004594]; NIFA [1004594, 690775] Funding Source: Federal
   RePORTER
FX This study was funded by the National Science Foundation award number
   DEB-1553049, to TH, and USDA NIFA McIntire-Stennis project 1004594, to
   TH. Sponsors played no role in the study design, data collection and
   analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.This work was
   supported by the National Science Foundation award number DEB-1553049
   and USDA NIFA McIntire-Stennis project 1004594.
CR Aarts G, 2013, J ANIM ECOL, V82, P1135, DOI 10.1111/1365-2656.12061
   Abatzoglou JT, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P11770, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1607171113
   [Anonymous], 1996, EVALUATION SOIL ORGA
   [Anonymous], FOR INV AN NAT PROGR
   Araújo MB, 2005, ECOGRAPHY, V28, P693, DOI 10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04253.x
   Araújo MB, 2012, ECOLOGY, V93, P1527, DOI 10.1890/11-1930.1
   Arno SF, 2000, US FOR SERV RMRS-P, V5, P225
   Barnes JM, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0050973
   Barnes KP, 2008, J FIELD ORNITHOL, V79, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2008.00166.x
   Blanc LA, 2008, CONDOR, V110, P80, DOI 10.1525/cond.2008.110.1.80
   Bond ML, 2009, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V73, P1116, DOI 10.2193/2008-248
   Breiman L., 2001, Machine Learning, V45, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Bryce SA, 2002, ENVIRON MANAGE, V30, P294, DOI 10.1007/s00267-002-2702-y
   Bzdok Danilo, 2018, Nat Methods, V15, P233, DOI 10.1038/nmeth.4642
   Conlisk E, 2015, ECOL MODEL, V301, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.02.004
   Coops NC, 2011, ECOL MODEL, V222, P2119, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.03.033
   Cumming SG, 2014, ECOGRAPHY, V37, P137, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00299.x
   Cutler DR, 2007, ECOLOGY, V88, P2783, DOI 10.1890/07-0539.1
   de Bruijn A, 2014, ECOL MODEL, V287, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.05.004
   Di Febbraro M, 2015, DIVERS DISTRIB, V21, P1141, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12362
   Dijak William, 2013, Computational Ecology and Software, V3, P17
   Drever MC, 2008, BIOL CONSERV, V141, P624, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.004
   Dudley JG, 2012, CONDOR, V114, P348, DOI 10.1525/cond.2012.110020
   Duveneck MJ, 2015, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V347, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.03.016
   Elith J, 2010, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V1, P330, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00036.x
   Fogg AM, 2014, AVIAN CONSERV ECOL, V9, DOI 10.5751/ACE-00671-090203
   Freeman EA, 2016, CAN J FOREST RES, V46, P323, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0562
   Fryer J.L., 2016, Fire Effects Information System
   Groves C, 1997, GREAT BASIN NAT, V57, P116
   Guillera-Arroita G., 2015, Glob Ecol Biogeogr, V24, P1
   Guillera-Arroita G, 2015, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V24, P276, DOI 10.1111/geb.12268
   Gustafson EJ, 2000, CAN J FOREST RES, V30, P32, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-30-1-32
   Heikkinen RK, 2012, ECOGRAPHY, V35, P276, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06999.x
   Hoyt JS, 2002, CAN J FOREST RES, V32, P1881, DOI 10.1139/X02-109
   Hudiburg TW, 2017, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V14, P3873, DOI 10.5194/bg-14-3873-2017
   Hutto RL, 2016, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V25, P1074, DOI 10.1071/WF15228
   Idaho Department of Fish and Game, 2005, AM 3 TOED WOODP
   Idaho Department of Fish and Game, 2005, FLAMM OWL
   Idaho Department of Fish and Game, 2018, SPEC DIV DAT
   Jetz W, 2007, PLOS BIOL, V5, P1211, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050157
   KARR JR, 1981, ENVIRON MANAGE, V5, P55, DOI 10.1007/BF01866609
   Kearney MR, 2010, CONSERV LETT, V3, P203, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00097.x
   La Sorte FA, 2010, J EXP BIOL, V213, P862, DOI 10.1242/jeb.038356
   LANDFIRE, 2014, LANDFIRE 1 4 0
   Langdon JGR, 2015, ECOSPHERE, V6, DOI 10.1890/ES14-00400.1
   Latif QS, 2016, CONDOR, V118, P766, DOI 10.1650/CONDOR-16-86.1
   Latif QS, 2016, ECOSPHERE, V7, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1346
   Latif QS, 2013, ECOL EVOL, V3, P4348, DOI 10.1002/ece3.790
   Law BE, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P3663, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1720064115
   Law BE, 2013, PLANT ECOL DIVERS, V6, P73, DOI 10.1080/17550874.2012.679013
   LeBrun JJ, 2017, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V32, P1433, DOI 10.1007/s10980-016-0463-x
   Lenihan JM, 2008, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V64, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.01.006
   Linkhart BD, 1998, WILSON BULL, V110, P342
   Martin K, 2004, CONDOR, V106, P5, DOI 10.1650/7482
   Martin KL, 2015, ECOSYSTEMS, V18, P76, DOI 10.1007/s10021-014-9813-1
   Matthews SN, 2011, ECOGRAPHY, V34, P933, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06803.x
   Mazziotta A, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V381, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.028
   McDowell NG, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P669, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2641, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2641]
   McElhinny C, 2005, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V218, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.034
   Montana Natural Heritage Program, 2016, BLACK BACK WOODP PIC
   Moreno-Amat E, 2015, ECOL MODEL, V312, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.05.035
   Naficy C, 2010, ECOL APPL, V20, P1851, DOI 10.1890/09-0217.1
   Newton I, 2006, ARDEA, V94, P433
   Odion DC, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0087852
   Oliver G.V., 2010, ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY
   Omernik JM, 2014, ENVIRON MANAGE, V54, P1249, DOI 10.1007/s00267-014-0364-1
   Parks SA, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/035002
   Parrish JD, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P851, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0851:AWCWWS]2.0.CO;2
   Peterson AT, 2007, ECOGRAPHY, V30, P550, DOI 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05102.x
   Powney GD, 2015, BIOL J LINN SOC, V115, P532, DOI 10.1111/bij.12517
   Randin CF, 2006, J BIOGEOGR, V33, P1689, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01466.x
   REYNOLDS RT, 1992, USDA ROCKY, V213, P166
   Roberts SL, 2011, BIOL CONSERV, V144, P610, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.002
   Rogers BM, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V116, DOI 10.1029/2011JG001695
   Rota CT, 2015, CONDOR, V117, P178, DOI 10.1650/CONDOR-14-112.1
   Saab VA, 2014, FOREST SCI, V60, P539, DOI 10.5849/forsci.13-022
   Saab VA, 2009, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V257, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.08.028
   Scheller RM, 2008, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V255, P1489, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.11.025
   Scheller RM, 2007, ECOL MODEL, V201, P409, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.10.009
   Scheller RM, 2012, ECOSPHERE, V3, DOI 10.1890/ES12-00241.1
   Scheller RM, 2011, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V26, P1491, DOI 10.1007/s10980-011-9663-6
   Scheller RM, 2011, ECOL MODEL, V222, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.09.009
   Scholer MN, 2014, J RAPTOR RES, V48, P128, DOI 10.3356/JRR-13-00049.1
   Segura A, 2014, ECOL RES, V29, P925, DOI 10.1007/s11284-014-1179-5
   Sillero N, 2011, ECOL MODEL, V222, P1343, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.01.018
   Smith JK, 1997, INTGTR363, V148
   Soberon Jorge, 2005, Biodiversity Informatics, V2, P1
   Spencer W, 2011, BIOL CONSERV, V144, P788, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.027
   Strom H, 2001, ORNIS FENNICA, V78, P145
   Sturtevant BR, 2009, ECOL MODEL, V220, P3380, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.07.030
   Sundblad G, 2009, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V83, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.03.025
   Ibarra JT, 2015, ECOSPHERE, V6, DOI 10.1890/ES15-00207.1
   Tremblay J.A., 2020, BIRDS OF THE WORLD, DOI [10.2173/bna.attwoo1.02, DOI 10.2173/BNA.ATTWOO1.02]
   Tremblay JA, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0191645
   Veloz S., 2013, Projected effects of climate change on the distribution and abundance of North Pacific birds and their habitats: Final report to the North Pacific Landscape Conservation Cooperative
   Vierling K.T., 2013, The Birds of North America
   Vierling KT, 2008, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V72, P422, DOI 10.2193/2006-212
   Vogeler JC, 2016, NORTHWEST SCI, V90, P421, DOI 10.3955/046.090.0404
   Walsh ES, 2019, ECOL EVOL, V9, P2305, DOI 10.1002/ece3.4876
   Wang WJ, 2014, ECOGRAPHY, V37, P225, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00495.x
   Weed AS, 2013, ECOL MONOGR, V83, P441, DOI 10.1890/13-0160.1
   Wenger SJ, 2012, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V3, P260, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00170.x
   Werkowska W, 2017, ENVIRON REV, V25, P127, DOI 10.1139/er-2016-0045
   Zapisocki R., 2000, Habitat suitability index model. Version 6, P2
NR 104
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 0
U2 5
PU PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
PI SAN FRANCISCO
PA 1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA
SN 1932-6203
J9 PLOS ONE
JI PLoS One
PD JUN 7
PY 2019
VL 14
IS 6
AR e0217299
DI 10.1371/journal.pone.0217299
PG 24
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA IC0OB
UT WOS:000470658500012
PM 31173586
OA gold, Green Published, Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Morille, B
   Musy, M
AF Morille, Benjamin
   Musy, Marjorie
BE Bikas, D
   Theodosiou, T
   Katerina, T
TI Comparison of the impact of three climate adaptation strategies on
   summer thermal comfort - Cases study in Lyon, France
SO SUSTAINABLE SYNERGIES FROM BUILDINGS TO THE URBAN SCALE
SE Procedia Environmental Sciences
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT International Conference on Sustainable Synergies from Buildings to the
   Urban Scale (SBE)
CY OCT 16-19, 2016
CL Thessaloniki, GREECE
SP Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Lab Building Construct & Building Phys, Tech Chamber Greece
DE Thermal comfort; water aspersion; vegetation; cool materials; urban
   climate; Solene-microclimat
ID MITIGATION STRATEGIES; URBAN; ENVIRONMENTS
AB Nowadays, the study of the outside thermal comfort is more and more taking into consideration in the urban design process. In a climate change context, town planners have to find solutions to mitigate the effects of the global warming and to ensure that outside spaces designed in new districts will remain liveable.
   In the framework of the EVA project, simulations were carried out to compare the effect of three urban cooling strategies on the thermal comfort in summer. Various urban greenery types, water aspersion systems and cooling materials are applied to three districts in Lyon, France. A set of simulations was designed to explore different configurations:
   - cooling strategies were first applied one by one in each district, - a composition of the three strategies is considered in a second step to optimize their effect,
   - cumulative effect is finally investigated by deducing one of the components from the optimized configuration.
   Simulations were performed using Solene-microclimat which realizes the full coupling between a CFD code and a thermo-radiative model. In this way, Solene-microclimat enables to calculate and evaluate the evolution on the urban microclimate at a district scale considering physical parameters in a completely discretized way. Modules have been introduced in this model to represent different kinds of adaptation strategies such as vegetation (green roofs and walls, trees, lawns) and water aspersion. For each case, the daily variations of surface and air temperatures fields are obtained and compared. The resulting mean radiant temperature is evaluated and investigated for the studied space of each district. Finally, the thermal comfort is assessed using the UTCI index. Findings indicate that vegetation, in particular when including trees is the more efficient, due to its shading effect. Even if water aspersion can strongly lower the surface temperatures, its effect on thermal comfort is local and limited compared to the effect of vegetation. Due to reflection effects, high albedo materials are less efficient concerning external thermal comfort. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier
C1 [Morille, Benjamin; Musy, Marjorie] Ensa Nantes, CRENAU UMR CNRS ECN MCC 1563, 6 Quai F Mitterrand, Nantes, France.
   [Morille, Benjamin; Musy, Marjorie] IRSTV, FR CNRS 2488, 1 Rue Noe, F-44300 Nantes, France.
C3 Nantes Universite; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
RP Morille, B (corresponding author), Ensa Nantes, CRENAU UMR CNRS ECN MCC 1563, 6 Quai F Mitterrand, Nantes, France.; Morille, B (corresponding author), IRSTV, FR CNRS 2488, 1 Rue Noe, F-44300 Nantes, France.
FU ADEME (French Environment and Energy Management Agency)
FX This research work was carried out within the scope of the EVA Project,
   funded by ADEME (French Environment and Energy Management Agency). It
   implies Veolia Environnement and IRSTV (Institute for Research on Urban
   Sciences and Techniques).
CR Bouyer J., 2009, THESIS
   Goldberg V, 2013, METEOROL Z, V22, P739, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0463
   Lee H, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V148, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.004
   Malys L., 2012, THESIS
   Malys L, 2015, BUILD ENVIRON, V73, P187
   Miguet F., 2000, THESIS
   O'Malley C, 2015, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V19, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2015.05.009
   Park S, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.014
   Robitu M., 2005, THESIS U NANTES NANT
   Salata F, 2015, ENERG BUILDINGS, V99, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.04.010
   Taleghani M, GEOPHYS RES LETT
   Taleghani M, 2014, BUILD ENVIRON, V73, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.12.006
   Tan Z, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V114, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.031
   Tseliou A, 2016, BUILD SIMUL-CHINA, V9, P251, DOI 10.1007/s12273-016-0270-y
   Wang YP, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V114, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.046
   Yang F, 2011, ARCHIT SCI REV, V54, P285, DOI 10.1080/00038628.2011.613646
   Yang XS, 2013, BUILD ENVIRON, V60, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.11.008
NR 17
TC 14
Z9 14
U1 0
U2 14
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
PI AMSTERDAM
PA SARA BURGERHARTSTRAAT 25, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1878-0296
J9 PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI
PY 2017
VL 38
BP 619
EP 626
DI 10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.141
PG 8
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil; Environmental
   Sciences
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA BI3FM
UT WOS:000410925400079
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Brawner, JT
   Hodge, GR
   Meder, R
   Dvorak, WS
AF Brawner, J. T.
   Hodge, G. R.
   Meder, R.
   Dvorak, W. S.
TI Visualising the environmental preferences of <i>Pinus tecunumanii</i>
   populations
SO TREE GENETICS & GENOMES
LA English
DT Article
DE Genotype by environment interaction; Provenance; Response profiles;
   Climatic adaptation; Genetic conservation; Forest genetic resources
ID SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; EUCALYPTUS-GLOBULUS;
   GENETIC-PARAMETERS; GROWTH; GENOTYPE; PRODUCTIVITY; ADAPTATION;
   RESOLUTION; RESPONSES
AB A network of 92 pedigreed ex situ conservation plantings of Pinus tecunumanii, established as replicated progeny within provenance trials, is used to present a principal components-based analysis that illustrates the climatic preferences of 23 populations from the species' native range. This meta-analysis quantifies changes in the relative productivity, assessed as individual-tree volume, of populations across climatic gradients and associates the preference of a population with increased volume production along the climatic gradient. Clustering and ordination on the matrix containing estimates of change in productivity for each population summarise differentials in productivity associated with climatic gradients. The preference of populations along principal components therefore reflects the adaptive profiles of populations, which may be used with breeding-value estimates from routine genetic evaluations to assist with the development of deployment populations targeting different environments. As well, the approach may be used to test whether the preference of a population, estimated as population loadings for growth differentials, is affected by the climate in the native range of the population. This relationship may be interpreted as an estimate of how much local climate shapes the adaptive profiles of populations. The amount and seasonality of precipitation most clearly differentiate the adaptive profiles of populations, with less variation in the population responses explained by temperature differentiation. As expected from type-B correlation estimates, most populations exhibited small changes in relative productivity across climatic gradients. However, patterns of similarities in adaptive profiles among populations were evident using spatial orientation to display population responses to the climatic variables experienced in the provenance trials. Clustering and ordination of population responses derived from empirical data served to identify populations that responded positively or negatively to climatic variables; this information may help guide conservation genetics efforts, direct the deployment of germplasm, or identify seed sources that are sensitive to changes in climatic variables. Linking response patterns to the climatic data from the native range of each population indicated little effect of local climate shaping adaptive profiles.
C1 [Brawner, J. T.; Meder, R.] CSIRO, Div Plant Ind, Queensland Biosci Precinct, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.
   [Brawner, J. T.; Meder, R.] Univ Sunshine Coast, Forest Ind Res Ctr, Sippy Downs, Qld 4556, Australia.
   [Hodge, G. R.; Dvorak, W. S.] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Camcore, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA.
C3 Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO);
   Plant Industry; University of the Sunshine Coast; North Carolina State
   University
RP Brawner, JT (corresponding author), Univ Sunshine Coast, Forest Ind Res Ctr, 90 Sippy Downs Dr, Sippy Downs, Qld 4556, Australia.
EM Jeremy.Brawner@csiro.au
RI Meder, Albert/AAU-7252-2020
FU CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship's Adaptive Primary Industries,
   Enterprises and Communities
FX We would like to thank the CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship's Adaptive
   Primary Industries, Enterprises and Communities research theme for
   supporting the development of this work. The insightful comments from
   the associate editor and Tree Genetics and Genomics editorial review
   process, as well as those from CSIRO Plant Industry colleagues David
   Bush and Scott Chapman greatly improved this manuscript. We are also
   grateful for the support of all Camcore members who have managed the
   program over the past 35 years, particularly in those organisations that
   actively manage the field trials and conservation parks of Pinus
   tecunumanii.
CR Almeida AC, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P1730, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.008
   [Anonymous], 2008, Applied Multiway Data Analysis
   Baltunis BS, 2010, NEW FOREST, V40, P305, DOI 10.1007/s11056-010-9201-4
   Basford KE, 1996, ADAPTATION P IMPROVE, P125
   Benito-Garzón M, 2013, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V22, P1141, DOI 10.1111/geb.12075
   Bivand R., 2013, rgdal: Bindings for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library. R package version 0.8-10
   Blanquart F, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P1195, DOI 10.1111/ele.12150
   Brawner JT, 2013, EUPHYTICA, V191, P403, DOI 10.1007/s10681-013-0892-4
   Brawner JT, 2012, SOUTH FORESTS, V74, P121, DOI 10.2989/20702620.2012.701418
   Brawner JT, 1999, CAN J FOREST RES, V29, P737, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-29-6-737
   Carroll JD, 1972, INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENC
   Silva JCE, 2006, TREE GENET GENOMES, V2, P61, DOI 10.1007/s11295-005-0025-x
   Crisp M, 2004, PHILOS T R SOC B, V359, P1551, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2004.1528
   Cullis BR, 2010, GENOME, V53, P1002, DOI 10.1139/G10-080
   DeLacy IH, 1996, ADAPTATION P IMPROVE, P39
   Development Core Team R., 2013, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
   Dutkowski GW, 2012, TREE GENET GENOMES, V8, P757, DOI 10.1007/s11295-011-0461-8
   Dvorak W, 2000, PINUS TECUNUMANII CO
   Dvorak W. S., 2001, Southern African Forestry Journal, P19
   Dvorak WS, 1986, P JOINT M WORK PART, P299
   DVORAK WS, 1991, NEW FOREST, V4, P291
   EISEN EJ, 1983, THEOR APPL GENET, V67, P75, DOI 10.1007/BF00303929
   Estes LD, 2013, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V22, P1007, DOI 10.1111/geb.12034
   Franklin J, 2010, DIVERS DISTRIB, V16, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00641.x
   GABRIEL KR, 1971, BIOMETRIKA, V58, P453, DOI 10.1093/biomet/58.3.453
   Gillingham PK, 2012, DIVERS DISTRIB, V18, P990, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00933.x
   Hamann A, 2013, DIVERS DISTRIB, V19, P268, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00945.x
   Hardner CM, 2010, TREE GENET GENOMES, V6, P833, DOI 10.1007/s11295-010-0295-9
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   Hodge GR, 2012, SOUTH FORESTS, V74, P27, DOI 10.2989/20702620.2012.686192
   Hodge G. R., 1999, Forest Genetics, V6, P157
   Hodge GR, 2004, NEW FOREST, V28, P147, DOI 10.1023/B:NEFO.0000040942.34566.a7
   Kreyling J, 2010, DIVERS DISTRIB, V16, P593, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00675.x
   Leibing C, 2009, SCAND J FOREST RES, V24, P483, DOI 10.1080/02827580903378642
   Perry J.P., 1991, PINES MEXICO CENTRAL
   Ponce-Reyes R, 2013, DIVERS DISTRIB, V19, P518, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12064
   Razgour O, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P1258, DOI 10.1111/ele.12158
   Sork VL, 2013, TREE GENET GENOMES, V9, P901, DOI 10.1007/s11295-013-0596-x
   Stanger TK, 2010, SO FOR, V73, P131
   Storlie CJ, 2013, DIVERS DISTRIB, V19, P1106, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12068
   Yan Weikai, 2002, P289, DOI 10.1079/9780851996011.0289
NR 41
TC 4
Z9 5
U1 0
U2 31
PU SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
PI HEIDELBERG
PA TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
SN 1614-2942
EI 1614-2950
J9 TREE GENET GENOMES
JI Tree Genet. Genomes
PD OCT
PY 2014
VL 10
IS 5
BP 1123
EP 1133
DI 10.1007/s11295-014-0747-8
PG 11
WC Forestry; Genetics & Heredity; Horticulture
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry; Genetics & Heredity; Agriculture
GA AP7AE
UT WOS:000342229000002
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Zhao, S
   Liu, J
   Li, P
   Burritt, T
AF Zhao, Sheng
   Liu, Jenny
   Li, Peng
   Burritt, Tonya
TI Asphalt Binder Adaption for Climatic Conditions in Cold Regions: Alaska
   Experience
SO JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
LA English
DT Article
DE Asphalt binder adaptation; Cold climates; Alaska; Rutting;
   Low-temperature cracking
AB Asphalt binder adaptation in cold and spacious areas such as Alaska is critical because of varying climates and seasonal extreme conditions. To fully address the binder selection issues in Alaska, this paper presents a study that conducted analysis based on a long-term pavement performance (LTPP) database to reveal the climatic effects on binder selection, followed by evaluation of the laboratory and field performance of hot mix asphalt (HMA) containing neat binder and several currently used modified binders in Alaska. It was found that the recommended high performance grading (PG) grades for the entire Alaska are equal to or lower than 52 degrees C, whereas the low grades in more than 76% of the recorded weather stations in Alaska are recommended to be lower than -28 degrees C. Laboratory testing results showed that HMA with high-end modified binders expressed higher rutting resistance than that containing the neat binder PG 52-28, and HMA with the neat binder displayed the lowest resistance to low-temperature cracking compared to modified binders. Field surveys suggested that increasing high temperature grade would improve rutting resistance in Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (ADOT&PF)'s Central Region, although there was not enough evidence to draw any conclusion on modified binders' low-temperature performance in the Northern Region. It is recommended to keep using high-end modified binders in the Central Region and extend the low PG grade to -46 and/or -52 in trial projects in the Northern Region. In addition, more field projects covering different low-end modified binder grades in the Northern Region should be developed for better evaluation of low-temperature performance in that area. Furthermore, a systematic study of highly modified binders through both laboratory tests and field project monitoring is needed to provide more performance data and information for ADOT&PF to fully develop specifications of modified binders to better address the extremely climatic conditions in Alaska. (C) 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
C1 [Zhao, Sheng] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Inst Northern Engn, Ctr Environmentally Sustainable Transportat Cold, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA.
   [Liu, Jenny] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA.
   [Li, Peng] Changan Univ, Coll Highway, Xian 710064, Shannxi, Peoples R China.
   [Burritt, Tonya] Emuls Prod, 2111 Viking Dr, Anchorage, AK 99501 USA.
C3 University of Alaska System; University of Alaska Fairbanks; University
   of Alaska System; University of Alaska Fairbanks; Chang'an University
RP Liu, J (corresponding author), Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA.
EM Uszhao4@alaska.edu; jliu6@alaska.edu; pengli_ak@qq.com;
   tburritt@colaska.com
RI Zhao, Sheng/I-4302-2017
OI Liu, Juanyu/0000-0002-3840-1438
CR AASHTO, 2011, DET CREEP COMPL STRE
   AASHTO, 2011, T34010 AASHTO
   AASHTO, 2013, M320-10: Standard Specification For Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder
   Ahmed M., 2008, THESIS
   [Anonymous], 79 AASHTO TP
   [Anonymous], 2014, DISTRESS IDENTIFICAT
   Aschenbrener T. B, 1992, CDOTDTDR9212
   Brown E.R., 1990, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1282, P27
   FHWA (Federal Highway Administration), 2015, LTPP PROD
   Hajj EY, 2010, J ASSOC ASPHALT PAV, V79, P253
   Li P., 2014, 12214000092 INEAUTC
   Liu J., 2010, 1109 INEAUTC
   Liu JK, 2011, J INEQUAL APPL, P1, DOI 10.1186/1029-242X-2011-57
   McHattie R, 2001, COST EFFECTIVE REPAI
   McHattie R., 1980, FHWAAKRD801 AL DEP T
   Miller J.A., 1999, GROUND WATER ATLAS U
   Mullin A., 2014, P INT S CLIM EFF PAV
   Pavement Systems LLC, 2005, LTPPBIND VERS 3 1 BE
   Roberts F.L., 1996, HOT MIX ASPHALT MAT, VSecond
   Saboundjian S, 2011, TRANSPORT RES REC, P40, DOI 10.3141/2205-06
   Skok E., 2002, 200302 U MINN
   SOUSA JB, 1991, SHRPAIR91104 NAT RES
   Tonya B., 2009, LOW TEMPERATURE PAVE
NR 23
TC 8
Z9 9
U1 3
U2 20
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 0899-1561
EI 1943-5533
J9 J MATER CIVIL ENG
JI J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
PD JAN
PY 2017
VL 29
IS 1
AR 04016184
DI 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001709
PG 7
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil; Materials
   Science, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering; Materials Science
GA EK0ZE
UT WOS:000393654800015
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sun, QL
   Li, BL
   Jiang, YH
   Chen, XZ
   Zhou, GY
AF Sun, Qingling
   Li, Baolin
   Jiang, Yuhao
   Chen, Xiuzhi
   Zhou, Guoyi
TI Declined trend in herbaceous plant green-up dates on the Qinghai-Tibetan
   Plateau caused by spring warming slowdown
SO SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Spring phonology; GUD; Temporal change trend; Climate warming; Plant
   functional group; Ground observation
AB There has been much debate on the temporal change trend and existence of a turning point in spring green-up date (GUD) of plants on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP). Most previous studies on the QTP used remote sensing data, which have large uncertainties. In this study, using a large amount of long-term ground observation data at 27 phenological stations across the QTP (1694 GUD records), we showed that on the whole, QTP herbaceous plant GUD insignificantly advanced during 1982-2017. Although the direction of the GUD trend did not change from 1982 to 2017, the magnitude of the advancing trend greatly weakened after 1999. According to our estimated results from 28 paired GUD time series, the overall GUD trend shifted from -2.70 clays/decade during 1982-1999 to -0.56 days/decade during 2000-2017. This finding contrasts with the conclusions of previous satellite-based studies, which either reported a continuous significant advancement of GUD or a turning point in the mid-to-late 1990s. Through partial correlation analysis and partial least squares regression, we found that winter and spring air temperatures were the primary climatic factors that influenced the temporal change in GUD, and both had negative effects on GUD. The decreased GUD trend was mainly attributable to the warming slowdown in spring. On average, the spring warming rate decreased by 52.43% after 1999, whereas the winter warming rate displayed no obvious change. This study also found that the GUD of (orbs showed stronger sensitivity to air temperature change than that of sedges and grasses. This indicates that (orbs are more competitive in adaptation to climate warming, which might shift plant community structure and affect ecosystem service function. Moreover, the declined advancement in GUD implies that the spring phenologically driven increase in carbon uptake may have also slowed in the past two decades. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Sun, Qingling; Chen, Xiuzhi] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Atmospher Sci, Zhuhai 519082, Peoples R China.
   [Sun, Qingling] Chinese Acad Sci, South China Bot Garden, Guangzhou 510650, Peoples R China.
   [Sun, Qingling; Li, Baolin; Jiang, Yuhao] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, State Key Lab Resources & Environm Informat Syst, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Baolin; Jiang, Yuhao] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
   [Zhou, Guoyi] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Appl Meteorol, Inst Ecol, Jiangsu Key Lab Agr Meteorol, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China.
C3 Sun Yat Sen University; Chinese Academy of Sciences; South China
   Botanical Garden, CAS; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of
   Geographic Sciences & Natural Resources Research, CAS; Chinese Academy
   of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS; Nanjing
   University of Information Science & Technology
RP Li, BL (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, 11A Datun Rd, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.; Zhou, GY (corresponding author), Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, 219 Ningliu Rd, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China.
EM libl@lreis.ac.cn; gyzhou@nuist.edu.cn
FU National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2016YFC0500205];
   Innovative Talents Recruitment Programof Chinese Academy of Sciences
   [Y621231001]; National Natural Science Foundation of China
   [NSFC42071031]; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M653109];
   State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System,
   Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS
FX This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Plan
   of China (2016YFC0500205), the Innovative Talents Recruitment Programof
   Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y621231001), National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (NSFC42071031), China Postdoctoral Science
   Foundation (2019M653109), and a grant from the State Key Laboratory of
   Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic
   Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS.
CR [Anonymous], 2001, CHINESE KOBRESIA MEA
   BELL KL, 1979, ECOL MONOGR, V49, P377, DOI 10.2307/1942469
   Cane MA, 2010, NAT GEOSCI, V3, P231, DOI 10.1038/ngeo823
   Chen H, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, pE93, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1100091108
   Chen XQ, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P3635, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12954
   Cheng M, 2018, INT J REMOTE SENS, V39, P470, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2017.1387308
   China Meteorological Administration, 1993, OBS CRIT AGR MET
   Chuine I, 2000, J THEOR BIOL, V207, P337, DOI 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2178
   Chuine I, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P3149, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0142
   Cong N, 2017, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V232, P650, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.10.021
   Coville FV, 1920, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V6, P434, DOI 10.1073/pnas.6.7.434
   Fu YSH, 2015, NATURE, V526, P104, DOI 10.1038/nature15402
   Guo DL, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V117, DOI 10.1029/2011JD016545
   Harris RB, 2010, J ARID ENVIRON, V74, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.06.014
   Hu HC, 2009, ENVIRON GEOL, V57, P1391, DOI 10.1007/s00254-008-1417-7
   Jeong SJ, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2385, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02397.x
   Jin ZN, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V119, P435, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0722-7
   [雷占兰 Lei Zhanlan], 2012, [中国草地学报, Chinese Journal of Grassland], V34, P10
   [李林 Li Lin], 2011, [冰川冻土, Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology], V33, P1006
   Li RC, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep20985
   Liu HY, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P4051, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1700299114
   Liu LL, 2016, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V60, P1563, DOI 10.1007/s00484-016-1147-6
   Liu YJ, 2019, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V135, P1375, DOI 10.1007/s00704-018-2435-3
   Ma N, 2020, CLIM DYNAM, V55, P2867, DOI 10.1007/s00382-020-05422-z
   Menzel A, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P1969, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01193.x
   Niu KC, 2010, PLANT SOIL, V330, P215, DOI 10.1007/s11104-009-0194-8
   Park H, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P6190, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15322
   Piao SL, 2008, NATURE, V451, P49, DOI 10.1038/nature06444
   Piao SL, 2007, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V21, DOI 10.1029/2006GB002888
   Piao SL, 2011, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V151, P1599, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.06.016
   Rahmstorf S, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P17905, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1101766108
   RAUNKIAER C., 1934
   Richardson AD, 2013, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V169, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.012
   Schaber J, 2003, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V47, P193, DOI 10.1007/s00484-003-0171-5
   Schwartz M.D., 2013, PHENOLOGY INTEGRATIV, V2nd
   Shen MG, 2015, NATL SCI REV, V2, P454, DOI 10.1093/nsr/nwv058
   Shen MG, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P3647, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12961
   Shen MG, 2014, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V189, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.01.003
   Shen MG, 2011, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V151, P1711, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.07.003
   Shen MG, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, pE91, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1018390108
   Sun QL, 2020, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V284, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107896
   Sun QL, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V93, P1089, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.061
   Wang H, 2020, ECOL LETT, V23, P701, DOI 10.1111/ele.13474
   Wang SP, 2014, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V189, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.01.021
   Wang SY, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V593, P449, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.187
   Wang SY, 2017, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V232, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.08.020
   Wang XF, 2017, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V122, P3288, DOI 10.1002/2017JG003949
   Wu GL, 2009, PLANT SOIL, V319, P115, DOI 10.1007/s11104-008-9854-3
   Wu YB, 2013, ECOL RES, V28, P493, DOI 10.1007/s11284-013-1038-9
   Wu YB, 2011, PLANT SOIL, V338, P497, DOI 10.1007/s11104-010-0562-4
   Xie ZY, 2019, ECOSPHERE, V10, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2733
   [徐维新 Xu Weixin], 2014, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V34, P1781
   Yang MX, 2003, J ASIAN EARTH SCI, V21, P457, DOI 10.1016/S1367-9120(02)00069-X
   Yang Y, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V725, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138323
   Yu HY, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P22151, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1012490107
   Zhang GL, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P4309, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1210423110
   Zhang Q, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V248, P408, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.026
   Zheng ZT, 2016, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V223, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.04.012
   Zhou HK, 2014, BIOL LETTERS, V10, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0291
NR 59
TC 15
Z9 16
U1 1
U2 101
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0048-9697
EI 1879-1026
J9 SCI TOTAL ENVIRON
JI Sci. Total Environ.
PD JUN 10
PY 2021
VL 772
AR 145039
DI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145039
EA FEB 2021
PG 10
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA QW6JO
UT WOS:000628753700055
PM 33770902
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sterle, K
   Singletary, L
AF Sterle, Kelley
   Singletary, Loretta
TI Adapting to Variable Water Supply in the Truckee-Carson River System,
   Western USA
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE drought; adaptation strategies; adaptation barriers; collaborative
   modeling; qualitative data; climate uncertainty
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS; OVERCOMING BARRIERS;
   SIERRA-NEVADA; ADAPTATION; DROUGHT; MANAGEMENT; CALIFORNIA; RESPONSES;
   IMPACTS
AB In snow-fed inland river systems in the western United States, water supply depends upon timing, form, and amount of precipitation. In recent years, this region has experienced unprecedented drought conditions due to decreased snowpack, exacerbated by exceptionally warmer winter temperatures averaging 3-4 degrees C above normal. In the snow-fed Truckee-Carson River System, two sets of interviews were conducted as part of a larger collaborative modeling case study with local water managers to examine local adaptation to current drought conditions. A comparative analysis of these primary qualitative data, collected during the fourth and fifth consecutive years of continued warmer drought conditions, identifies shifts in adaptation strategies and emergent adaptation barriers. That is, under continuous exposure to climate stressors, managers shifted their adaptation focus from short-term efforts to manage water demand toward long-term efforts to enhance water supply. Managers described the need to: improve forecasts and scientific assessments of snowmelt timing, groundwater levels, and soil moisture content; increase flexibility of prior appropriation water allocation rules based on historical snowpack and streamflow timing; and foster collaboration and communication among water managers across the river system. While water scarcity and insufficient water delivery infrastructure remain significant impediments in this arid region, climate uncertainty emerged as a barrier surrounding adaptation to variable water supply. Existing prior appropriation based water institutions were also described as an adaptation barrier, meriting objective evaluation to assess how to best modify these historical institutions to support dynamic adaptation to climate-induced water supply variability. This study contributes to a growing body of research that assesses drought adaptation in snow-fed inland river systems, and contributes a unique report concerning how adaptation strategies and barriers encountered by local water managers change over time under continuous exposure to climate stressors. These locally identified adaptation strategies forward a larger collaborative modeling case study by informing alternative water management scenarios simulated through a suite of hydrologic and operations models tailored to this river system.
C1 [Sterle, Kelley] Univ Nevada, Grad Program Hydrol Sci, Reno, NV 89557 USA.
   [Singletary, Loretta] Univ Nevada, Dept Econ & Cooperat Extens, Reno, NV 89557 USA.
C3 Nevada System of Higher Education (NSHE); University of Nevada Reno;
   Nevada System of Higher Education (NSHE); University of Nevada Reno
RP Sterle, K (corresponding author), Univ Nevada, Grad Program Hydrol Sci, Reno, NV 89557 USA.
EM ksterle@unr.edu; singletaryl@unr.edu
OI Singletary, Loretta/0000-0002-7118-7998
FU National Science Foundation (NSF) Division of Earth Sciences Water
   Sustainability and Climate program [1360506]; Directorate For
   Geosciences; Division Of Earth Sciences [1360506] Funding Source:
   National Science Foundation
FX Research is funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF)
   Division of Earth Sciences Water Sustainability and Climate program
   (award# 1360506). The grant covers the cost of this publication. The
   authors acknowledge local water managers across the Truckee-Carson River
   System who contributed substantively to this study.
CR Adger WN, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V93, P335, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z
   Adger WN, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P77, DOI [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.03.001, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005]
   [Anonymous], NO NEV REG GROWTH ST
   [Anonymous], SP1704 U NEV COOP EX
   [Anonymous], TRUCK BAS STUD
   [Anonymous], DOES TMWA GET THEIR
   [Anonymous], PUBLICATION NEVADA W
   [Anonymous], STAT CLIM DROUGHT AN
   [Anonymous], NEV WAT SUPPL OUTL R
   [Anonymous], P AGR APPL EC ASS AA
   [Anonymous], NEV WAT SUPPL OUTL R
   [Anonymous], CARS CIT DAIL WAT SU
   [Anonymous], WATER RESOURCES
   [Anonymous], INTRO OUR HOME WATER
   [Anonymous], NEV WAT SUPPL OUTL R
   [Anonymous], FIELD BASED METHODOL
   [Anonymous], 2013, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, DOI DOI 10.1007/s11027-012-9423-1
   [Anonymous], NEV WAT SUPPL OUTL R
   [Anonymous], SP1603 U NEV COOP EX
   [Anonymous], P 2017 ANN C IT SOC
   [Anonymous], CLIM UNC POL POL MAK
   [Anonymous], NEV STAT WAT PLAN
   [Anonymous], NATURAL VARIABILITY
   [Anonymous], 2015, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
   [Anonymous], 2017, CRESWELL POTH
   [Anonymous], 1999, DISCOV GROUNDED THEO
   [Anonymous], ANN 2 GLOSS CLIM CHA
   [Anonymous], LEARNING FIELD
   [Anonymous], NAT RES CONS SERV BA
   [Anonymous], STAT CLIM NAT OV MAR
   [Anonymous], Q REP OUTL APR JUN 2
   [Anonymous], TRUCKEE CANAL SEEPAG
   Barnett J, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P1103, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2383
   Barnhart TB, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P8006, DOI 10.1002/2016GL069690
   Belmecheri S, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P2
   Berrang-Ford L, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.012
   Bond NA, 2015, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V42, P3414, DOI 10.1002/2015GL063306
   Burnham M, 2016, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V52, P1366, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12459
   Coleman JMA, 2016, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V134, P115, DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1524-x
   Cook BI, 2015, SCI ADV, V1, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1400082
   Dai AG, 2011, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V2, P45, DOI 10.1002/wcc.81
   Das T, 2009, J HYDROMETEOROL, V10, P871, DOI 10.1175/2009JHM1095.1
   Dettinger M, 2015, ECOL APPL, V25, P2069, DOI 10.1890/15-0938.1
   Dettinger MD, 2013, J HYDROMETEOROL, V14, P1721, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-13-02.1
   Diffenbaugh NS, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P3931, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1422385112
   Eisenack K, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P867, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2350
   Ekstrom JA, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V9, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2014.06.002
   Endter-Wada J, 2009, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V1, P54, DOI 10.1175/2009WCAS1009.1
   Engle NL, 2012, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V48, P1139, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00676.x
   Fritze H, 2011, J HYDROMETEOROL, V12, P989, DOI 10.1175/2011JHM1360.1
   Gallaher S, 2013, WATER POLICY, V15, P43, DOI 10.2166/wp.2012.027
   Godsey SE, 2014, HYDROL PROCESS, V28, P5048, DOI 10.1002/hyp.9943
   Haden V, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0052882
   Harpold A., 2017, EOS T AM GEOPHYS UN, V98
   Harpold AA, 2016, ADV WATER RESOUR, V92, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.03.017
   Hatchett BJ, 2015, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V42, P8632, DOI 10.1002/2015GL065841
   Howells M, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P621, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1789, 10.1038/nclimate1789]
   Jackson LE, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P407, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0306-3
   Jasechko S, 2014, WATER RESOUR RES, V50, P8845, DOI 10.1002/2014WR015809
   Jenni K, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V124, P371, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0806-4
   Kahil MT, 2015, J HYDROL, V522, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.12.042
   Kaplowitz MD, 2001, ECOL ECON, V36, P237, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00226-3
   Kates RW, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P7156, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1115521109
   Keskitalo ECH, 2012, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V22, P381, DOI 10.1002/eet.1579
   King AB, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8060232
   Kleppe JA, 2011, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V30, P3269, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2011.08.015
   Knowles N, 2006, J CLIMATE, V19, P4545, DOI 10.1175/JCLI3850.1
   Kruger R.A., 2015, Focus groups: A practice guide for applied research, V5th
   Kurasaki K., 2000, Field Methods, V12, P179, DOI [10.1177/1525822X0001200301, DOI 10.1177/1525822X0001200301]
   Lach D., 2005, International Journal of Water, V3, P1, DOI 10.1504/IJW.2005.007156
   Langsdale S, 2013, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V49, P629, DOI 10.1111/jawr.12065
   López-Hoffman L, 2013, ECOSPHERE, V4, DOI 10.1890/ES13-00118.1
   Mankin JS, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/114016
   McNeeley SM, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P1451, DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0585-0
   Meadow AM, 2015, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V7, P179, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-14-00050.1
   Miles M. B., 2014, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, V4th
   Morway ED, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V82, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.04.018
   Moser SC, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P22026, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1007887107
   Mote PW, 2005, B AM METEOROL SOC, V86, P39, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-86-1-39
   Nava LF, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8070291
   Niswonger RG, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P6970, DOI 10.1002/2017WR020458
   Onwuegbuzie A.J., 2009, Int J Qual Methods, V8, P1, DOI DOI 10.1177/160940690900800301
   Parris A., 2016, CLIMATE CONTEXT SCI, V1st
   Prell C, 2009, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V22, P501, DOI 10.1080/08941920802199202
   Pulwarty RS, 2015, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V29, P273, DOI 10.1007/s11269-014-0885-7
   Reed MS, 2008, BIOL CONSERV, V141, P2417, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
   Reed MS, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V90, P1933, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
   Regonda SK, 2005, J CLIMATE, V18, P372, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-3272.1
   Sandelowski M, 2000, RES NURS HEALTH, V23, P334, DOI 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
   Sandoval-Solis S, 2013, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V49, P639, DOI 10.1111/jawr.12070
   Singletary L, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9020099
   Stoutenborough JW, 2014, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V28, P697, DOI 10.1007/s11269-013-0509-7
   Thorne S, 2016, DEV QUAL INQ, V2
   Townley JohnM., 1998, TURN THIS WATER GOLD, V2nd
   Trujillo E, 2014, WATER RESOUR RES, V50, P5611, DOI 10.1002/2013WR014753
   Van Loon AF, 2016, NAT GEOSCI, V9, P89, DOI 10.1038/ngeo2646
   Wilds L.J., 2014, WATER POLITICS NO NE, V2nd
NR 97
TC 8
Z9 10
U1 1
U2 15
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD OCT
PY 2017
VL 9
IS 10
AR 768
DI 10.3390/w9100768
PG 24
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA FM1BZ
UT WOS:000414707500045
OA gold, Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Oosterbroek, B
   de Kraker, J
   Huynen, MMTE
   Martens, P
AF Oosterbroek, Bram
   de Kraker, Joop
   Huynen, Maud M. T. E.
   Martens, Pim
TI Integrated Assessment of Health Benefits and Burdens of Urban Greenspace
   Designs
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE spatial model; urban green space; human health; climate adaptation;
   ecosystem services; ecosystem disservices; GIS; quantitative assessment;
   scenario analysis
ID SCENARIO ANALYSIS; SPACE; BERLIN; IMPACT; CITY
AB Urban greening is a major goal in policies for sustainable cities, and spatial planners are nowadays strongly interested in the benefits of greenspace for the well-being of urban residents. We present a novel, model-based approach to support the development of effective greening strategies. The approach is quantitative and spatially explicit and accounts for multiple health benefits as well as burdens. In our study, we applied this generic approach to the city of Maastricht (The Netherlands) and conducted an integrated, city-scale assessment of the health benefits and burdens of four urban greenspace designs. These included: 'No greenspace', 'Current greenspace', 'Green parking lots and squares', and 'Optimized greenspace locations'. For each greenspace design, indicator values were calculated for five determinants of health and well-being: heat stress, air pollution, perceived unsafety, unattractive views, and tick-bite risk. To assess the health contribution of urban greenspace in a given design, these indicator values were compared with the values in the 'No greenspace' design. The study produced clear, quantitative conclusions about the health benefits and burdens of the urban greenspace designs for the case of Maastricht but also generated novel, more general insights relevant to the planning of urban greenspace for health and well-being. These insights concern the importance of translating health policy objectives into specific target values or thresholds and the importance of 'smart' choices in greenspace type and location that can effectively reduce trade-offs between health benefits and burdens, as well as the insights that adding more greenery not always improves urban health and that urban greenspace alone cannot solve major air pollution problems. The priorities for future research, which will address the limitations of the presented approach, concern a further expansion of the range of health benefits and burdens covered by the model and the development of a common metric for the entire range of health benefits and burdens to optimize greenspace design and maximize its overall net health benefit.
C1 [Oosterbroek, Bram; de Kraker, Joop; Huynen, Maud M. T. E.] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht Sustainabil Inst, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands.
   [de Kraker, Joop] Open Univ, Dept Environm Sci, NL-6401 DL Heerlen, Netherlands.
   [Martens, Pim] Maastricht Univ, Univ Coll Venlo, Fac Sci & Engn, Syst Earth Sci, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands.
C3 Maastricht University; Open University Netherlands; Maastricht
   University
RP de Kraker, J (corresponding author), Maastricht Univ, Maastricht Sustainabil Inst, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands.; de Kraker, J (corresponding author), Open Univ, Dept Environm Sci, NL-6401 DL Heerlen, Netherlands.
EM oosterbroek.bram@gmail.com; j.dekraker@maastrichtuniversity.nl;
   m.huynen@maastrichtuniversity.nl; p.martens@maastrichtuniversity.nl
RI Martens, Pim/A-9297-2011
OI Oosterbroek, Bram/0000-0002-3866-342X; Martens, Pim/0000-0002-7489-0048;
   de Kraker, Joop/0000-0002-7968-0680
CR [Anonymous], United Nations Goal 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
   [Anonymous], 2021, KNMI Heatwaves
   [Anonymous], 2019, Deel 2 2019
   Börjeson L, 2006, FUTURES, V38, P723, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2005.12.002
   Bush J, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V35, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.015
   CBS Bevolking, 2018, Ontwikkeling in Gemeenten Met 100,000 of Meer Inwoners
   Chen TT, 2020, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V146, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000541
   Coppel G, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V167, P410, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.015
   Datta S, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100995
   Dütemeyer D, 2013, ERDE, V144, P181
   European Commission, 2021, EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: bringing nature back into our lives
   Fischer TB, 2018, IMPACT ASSESS PROJ A, V36, P32, DOI 10.1080/14615517.2017.1364021
   Gassner F., 2018, Teek II' Omgaan Met Teken in de Bebouwde Kom
   Irvine K, 2021, J WATER MANAG MODELL, V29, DOI 10.14796/JWMM.C476
   Kadaverugu Rakesh, 2021, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, V14, DOI 10.1007/s12517-020-06380-w
   Kim I, 2021, ENVIRON MANAGE, V67, P192, DOI 10.1007/s00267-020-01394-2
   Kondo MC, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15030445
   Koopmans S, 2018, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/atmos9090353
   Kruize H, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16224403
   Lafrenz AJ, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph191710867
   Lauf S, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V52, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.017
   Liou YA, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105405
   Maes J., 2019, ENHANCING RESILIENCE
   Mikovits C, 2018, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V68, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.09.006
   Onyango AW, 2006, ACTA PAEDIATR, V95, P38, DOI 10.1080/08035320500494464
   Oosterbroek B, 2024, LAND-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/land13010088
   Oosterbroek B, 2023, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128023
   Pluchinotta I, 2024, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V353, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120110
   Rayaprolu HS, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V47, P662, DOI 10.1177/2399808318797334
   Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM), 2019, Ontwikkeling Standaard Stresstest Hitte
   Nouri AS, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V37, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.031
   Speak A, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V197, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103748
   Spijker J., 2019, Environ. Res
   Takken W, 2016, ECOLOGY AND PREVENTION OF LYME BORRELIOSIS: ECOLOGY AND CONTROL OF VECTOR-BORNE DISEASES, VOL 4, P149, DOI 10.3920/978-90-8686-838-4_10
   Thierfelder H, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.09.004
   Wang HQ, 2024, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V8, pe574, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00140-2
   Wang HQ, 2024, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V242, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104934
   WHO Ambient (Outdoor), 2021, Air Pollution
   Woloshin S, 2000, MED DECIS MAKING, V20, P298, DOI 10.1177/0272989X0002000306
   Zhang D, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V96, P559, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.030
NR 40
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 7
U2 7
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD SEP
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 17
AR 7534
DI 10.3390/su16177534
PG 18
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA F7S6Q
UT WOS:001311776200001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Lima, JS
   Lenoir, J
   Hylander, K
AF Lima, Jacqueline Souza
   Lenoir, Jonathan
   Hylander, Kristoffer
TI Potential migration pathways of broadleaved trees across the receding
   boreal biome under future climate change
SO GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE broadleaved forest; climate adaptation; forestry; habitat suitability;
   range margins; range shift dynamics; species distribution models;
   species redistribution
ID ASSISTED MIGRATION; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; CHANGE
   IMPACTS; RANGE SHIFTS; RESPONSES; MICROREFUGIA; BIODIVERSITY;
   STRATEGIES; RESOLUTION
AB Climate change has triggered poleward expansions in the distributions of various taxonomic groups, including tree species. Given the ecological significance of trees as keystone species in forests and their socio-economic importance, projecting the potential future distributions of tree species is crucial for devising effective adaptation strategies for both biomass production and biodiversity conservation in future forest ecosystems. Here, we fitted physiographically informed habitat suitability models (HSMs) at 50-m resolution across Sweden (55-68 degrees N) to estimate the potential northward expansion of seven broadleaved tree species within their leading-edge distributions in Europe under different future climate change scenarios and for different time periods. Overall, we observed that minimum temperature was the most crucial variable for comprehending the spatial distribution of broadleaved tree species at their cold limits. Our HSMs projected a complex range expansion pattern for 2100, with individualistic differences among species. However, a frequent and rather surprising pattern was a northward expansion along the east coast followed by narrow migration pathways along larger valleys towards edaphically suitable areas in the north-west, where most of the studied species were predicted to expand. The high-resolution maps generated in this study offer valuable insights for our understanding of range shift dynamics at the leading edge of southern tree species as they expand into the receding boreal biome. These maps suggest areas where broadleaved tree species could already be translocated to anticipate forest and biodiversity conservation adaptation efforts in the face of future climate change.
   Climate change is pushing tree species to expand poleward, which has significant ecological and economic impacts. Here, we used fine-grained habitat suitability models to predict where seven species of broadleaved trees might expand in Sweden by 2100, considering different climate scenarios. We found that minimum temperature is crucial to predict where broadleaved tree species are likely to expand, with the east coast and inner valleys of Sweden being important migration pathways.image
C1 [Lima, Jacqueline Souza; Hylander, Kristoffer] Stockholm Univ, Dept Ecol Environm & Plant Sci, Stockholm, Sweden.
   [Lima, Jacqueline Souza; Hylander, Kristoffer] Stockholm Univ, Bolin Ctr Climate Res, Stockholm, Sweden.
   [Lima, Jacqueline Souza] Inst Tecnol Vale, Belem, Brazil.
   [Lenoir, Jonathan] Univ Picardie Jules Verne, CNRS, UMR 7058, Ecol & Dynam Syst Anthropises EDYSAN, Amiens, France.
C3 Stockholm University; Instituto Tecnologico Vale Desenvolvimento
   Sustentavel; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS);
   Universite de Picardie Jules Verne (UPJV)
RP Lima, JS (corresponding author), Stockholm Univ, Dept Ecol Environm & Plant Sci, Stockholm, Sweden.
EM jac.slima@gmail.com
RI Lenoir, Jonathan/AAE-8441-2019
OI Lenoir, Jonathan/0000-0003-0638-9582
FU Bolin Centre for Climate Research; Carl Tryggers Stiftelse for
   Vetenskaplig Forskning [CTS19:148]
FX Bolin Centre for Climate Research; Carl Tryggers Stiftelse for
   Vetenskaplig Forskning, Grant/Award Number: CTS19:148
CR Lee-Yaw JA, 2022, ECOGRAPHY, V2022, DOI 10.1111/ecog.05877
   Ågren AM, 2021, GEODERMA, V404, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115280
   Appelhans T, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V65, P1
   Ballabio C, 2019, GEODERMA, V355, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113912
   Beauregard F, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0092642
   Bertrand R, 2011, NATURE, V479, P517, DOI 10.1038/nature10548
   Bivand Roger, 2023, CRAN
   Boisvert-Marsh L, 2019, J ECOL, V107, P1956, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13149
   Bolte A, 2009, SCAND J FOREST RES, V24, P473, DOI 10.1080/02827580903418224
   Bonannella C, 2022, PEERJ, V10, DOI 10.7717/peerj.13728
   Boyce MS, 2002, ECOL MODEL, V157, P281, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00200-4
   Champagne E, 2021, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V498, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119576
   Chauvier Y, 2022, ECOGRAPHY, V2022, DOI 10.1111/ecog.05973
   Christiansen DM, 2022, J ECOL, V110, P631, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13825
   Crimmins TM, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P1141, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01831.x
   Di Marco M, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P2169, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12834
   Dobrowski SZ, 2015, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V24, P917, DOI 10.1111/geb.12302
   Dobrowski SZ, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P1022, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02263.x
   Draper D, 2019, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V19, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00653
   Dyderski MK, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P1150, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13925
   Fisichelli N, 2014, OIKOS, V123, P1331, DOI 10.1111/oik.01349
   Fransson S., 1965, ACTA PHYTOGEOGRAPHIC, V50, P167
   Fridman J, 2014, SILVA FENN, V48, DOI 10.14214/sf.1095
   Fuchs S, 2021, NEW PHYTOL, V231, P1387, DOI 10.1111/nph.17448
   Gao T, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V330, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.007
   Guisan A., 2017, Habitat Suitability and Distribution Models: With Applications in R
   Haesen S, 2023, ECOL LETT, V26, P2043, DOI 10.1111/ele.14312
   Hirzel AH, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V199, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.017
   Hylander K, 2022, CONSERV BIOL, V36, DOI 10.1111/cobi.13847
   Janowiak MK, 2014, J FOREST, V112, P424, DOI 10.5849/jof.13-094
   Jump AS, 2009, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V24, P694, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.007
   Karger D. N., 2017, Scientific Data, V4, DOI [10.1594/WDCC/CHELSA, DOI 10.1594/WDCC/CHELSA]
   Koralewski TE, 2015, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V344, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.02.014
   Körner C, 2021, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V36, P979, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2021.06.011
   Kremer A, 2010, MOLECULAR APPROACHES IN NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT, P101
   Lembrechts JJ, 2019, ECOGRAPHY, V42, P1267, DOI 10.1111/ecog.03947
   Lenoir J, 2015, ECOGRAPHY, V38, P15, DOI 10.1111/ecog.00967
   Lenoir J, 2020, NAT ECOL EVOL, V4, P1044, DOI 10.1038/s41559-020-1198-2
   Lenoir J, 2010, ECOGRAPHY, V33, P295, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06279.x
   LescopSinclair K, 1995, J ECOL, V83, P929, DOI 10.2307/2261175
   Lloyd AH, 2003, ECOSCIENCE, V10, P176, DOI 10.1080/11956860.2003.11682765
   Lunt ID, 2013, BIOL CONSERV, V157, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.034
   Marscher J. W., 1990, ngermanlands flora
   Mauri A, 2022, SCI DATA, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41597-022-01128-5
   Meineri E, 2017, ECOGRAPHY, V40, P1003, DOI 10.1111/ecog.02494
   Mitchell RJ, 2019, BIOL CONSERV, V233, P316, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.03.040
   Monleon VJ, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0118069
   Naimi B, 2014, ECOGRAPHY, V37, P191, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00205.x
   Newbold T, 2015, NATURE, V520, P45, DOI 10.1038/nature14324
   Normand S, 2009, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V18, P437, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00451.x
   Palik BJ, 2022, ECOSPHERE, V13, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.4260
   Panagos P, 2014, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V479, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.010
   Parmesan C, 2003, NATURE, V421, P37, DOI 10.1038/nature01286
   Pearson RG, 2006, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V21, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.022
   Pecchi M, 2019, ECOL MODEL, V411, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108817
   Pedlar JH, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/srep43881
   Pedlar JH, 2012, BIOSCIENCE, V62, P835, DOI 10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.10
   Piedallu C, 2013, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V22, P470, DOI 10.1111/geb.12012
   Poli P, 2022, EUR J FOREST RES, V141, P253, DOI 10.1007/s10342-021-01437-1
   Potter KA, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P2932, DOI [10.1111/gcb.12257, 10.1111/]
   Roberts DR, 2017, ECOGRAPHY, V40, P913, DOI 10.1111/ecog.02881
   Rubenstein MA, 2023, ENVIRON EVID, V12, DOI 10.1186/s13750-023-00296-0
   Santini A, 2015, IFOREST, V8, P126, DOI [10.1504/IJPM.2015.066292, 10.3832/ifor1231-008]
   Scheffers BR, 2016, SCIENCE, V354, DOI 10.1126/science.aaf7671
   Skovsgaard JP, 2010, FOREST PATHOL, V40, P7, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2009.00599.x
   Sobala M, 2020, RESOURCES-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/resources9120141
   Sturm M, 2001, NATURE, V411, P546, DOI 10.1038/35079180
   Thomas CD, 2011, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V26, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.02.006
   Valavi R, 2019, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V10, P225, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.13107
   Vale CG, 2014, DIVERS DISTRIB, V20, P20, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12115
   Vessella F, 2017, EUR J FOREST RES, V136, P555, DOI 10.1007/s10342-017-1055-2
   Vitasse Y, 2021, BIOL REV, V96, P1816, DOI 10.1111/brv.12727
   Vitt P, 2010, BIOL CONSERV, V143, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.08.015
   Wasof S, 2015, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V24, P1401, DOI 10.1111/geb.12375
   Willis KJ, 1997, ECOLOGY, V78, P740, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0740:DSCCVC]2.0.CO;2
   Winder R, 2011, FOREST CHRON, V87, P731, DOI 10.5558/tfc2011-090
   Zellweger F, 2020, SCIENCE, V368, P772, DOI 10.1126/science.aba6880
NR 77
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 14
U2 14
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1354-1013
EI 1365-2486
J9 GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL
JI Glob. Change Biol.
PD AUG
PY 2024
VL 30
IS 8
AR e17471
DI 10.1111/gcb.17471
PG 17
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA D6Z2J
UT WOS:001297638700001
PM 39188066
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Yeager, R
   Browning, MHEM
   Breyer, E
   Ossola, A
   Larson, LR
   Riggs, DW
   Rigolon, A
   Chandler, C
   Fleischer, D
   Keith, R
   Walker, K
   Hart, JL
   Smith, T
   Bhatnagar, A
AF Yeager, Ray
   Browning, Matthew H. E. M.
   Breyer, Elizabeth
   Ossola, Alessandro
   Larson, Lincoln R.
   Riggs, Daniel W.
   Rigolon, Alessandro
   Chandler, Christopher
   Fleischer, Daniel
   Keith, Rachel
   Walker, Kandi
   Hart, Joy L.
   Smith, Ted
   Bhatnagar, Aruni
TI Greenness and equity: Complex connections between intra-neighborhood
   contexts and residential tree planting implementation
SO ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Greenness; Socioeconomic Status; Environmental Justice; Sustainability;
   Planting; Implementation
ID ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; URBAN;
   PROGRAMS; HEALTH; VEGETATION; LANDSCAPE; ACCESS; SPACE
AB Associations between neighborhood greenness and socioeconomic status (SES) are established, yet intraneighborhood context and SES-related barriers to tree planting remain unclear. Large-scale tree planting implementation efforts are increasingly common and can improve human health, strengthen climate adaptation, and ameliorate environmental inequities. Yet, these efforts may be ineffective without in-depth understanding of local SES inequities and barriers to residential planting. We recruited 636 residents within and surrounding the Oakdale Neighborhood of Louisville, Kentucky, USA, and evaluated associations of individual and neighborhood-level sociodemographic indicators with greenness levels at multiple scales. We offered no-cost residential tree planting and maintenance to residents within a subsection of the neighborhood and examined associations of these sociodemographic indicators plus baseline greenness levels with tree planting adoption among 215 eligible participants. We observed positive associations of income with Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and leaf area index (LAI) within all radii around homes, and within yards of residents, that varied in strength. There were stronger associations of income with NDVI in front yards but LAI in back yards. Among Participants of Color, associations between income and NDVI were stronger than with Whites and exhibited no association with LAI. Tree planting uptake was not associated with income, education, race, nor employment status, but was positively associated with lot size, home value, lower population density, and area greenness. Our findings reveal significant complexity of intra-neighborhood associations between SES and greenness that could help shape future research and equitable greening implementation. Results show that previously documented links between SES and greenspace at large scales extend to residents' yards, highlighting opportunities to redress greenness inequities on private property. Our analysis found that uptake of no-cost residential planting and maintenance was nearly equal across SES groups but did not redress greenness inequity. To inform equitable greening, further research is needed to evaluate culture, norms, perceptions, and values affecting tree planting acceptance among low-SES residents.
C1 [Yeager, Ray; Riggs, Daniel W.; Keith, Rachel; Walker, Kandi; Bhatnagar, Aruni] Univ Louisville, Christina Lee Brown Envirome Inst, 302 E Muhammad Ali Blvd, Louisville, KY 40202 USA.
   [Yeager, Ray; Riggs, Daniel W.; Keith, Rachel; Bhatnagar, Aruni] Univ Louisville, Dept Med, Div Environm Med, 302 Muhammad Ali Blvd, Louisville, KY 40202 USA.
   [Yeager, Ray; Riggs, Daniel W.; Keith, Rachel; Bhatnagar, Aruni] Univ Louisville, Superfund Res Ctr, 302 Muhammad Ali Blvd, Louisville, KY 40202 USA.
   [Yeager, Ray; Bhatnagar, Aruni] Univ Louisville, Ctr Integrat Environm Hlth Sci, 302 Muhammad Ali Blvd, Louisville, KY 40202 USA.
   [Browning, Matthew H. E. M.] Clemson Univ, Dept Pk Recreat & Tourism Management, Sirrine 120B, Clemson, SC USA.
   [Breyer, Elizabeth] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Geog, Bldg 0443,797 Lamar St, College Stn, TX 77843 USA.
   [Ossola, Alessandro] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, PES 1238,One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
   [Larson, Lincoln R.] North Carolina State Univ, Coll Nat Resources, Biltmore Hall 4008L, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA.
   [Rigolon, Alessandro] Univ Utah, Dept City & Metropolitan Planning, 375 S 1530 E,RM 204 ARCH, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA.
   [Chandler, Christopher] North Amer Cities Network, Nat Conservancy 308 Cent Ave, Pewee Valley, KY 40056 USA.
   [Fleischer, Daniel] Hyphae Design Lab, 942 Clay St, Oakland, CA 94607 USA.
   [Walker, Kandi] Univ Louisville, Dept Commun, 2301 South 3rd St, Louisville, KY 40292 USA.
C3 University of Louisville; University of Louisville; University of
   Louisville; University of Louisville; Clemson University; Texas A&M
   University System; Texas A&M University College Station; University of
   California System; University of California Davis; North Carolina State
   University; Utah System of Higher Education; University of Utah;
   University of Louisville
RP Yeager, R (corresponding author), Univ Louisville, Christina Lee Brown Envirome Inst, 302 E Muhammad Ali Blvd, Louisville, KY 40202 USA.
EM ray.yeager@louisville.edu
RI Rigolon, Alessandro/JOZ-2498-2023; Ossola, Alessandro/D-1262-2012;
   Browning, Matthew/D-2111-2014
OI Larson, Lincoln/0000-0001-9591-1269; Ossola,
   Alessandro/0000-0002-0507-6026; Rigolon, Alessandro/0000-0001-5197-6394;
   Riggs, Daniel/0000-0002-3503-0600; Browning,
   Matthew/0000-0003-2296-7602; Yeager, PhD, Ray/0000-0002-5897-1913;
   Breyer, Betsy/0000-0001-6355-1203
FU National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) [R01
   ES029846, P42 ES023716]; National Urban and Community Advisory Council
   [16-DG-11132544-036, 20-DG-11132544-057, 20-DG-11132544-033]
FX This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of
   Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS R01 ES029846 and P42 ES023716), The
   Nature Conservancy, and the Owsley Brown II Family Foundation.
   Christopher Chandler of The Nature Conservancy was invited to co-author
   this article due to his extensive role in development and planting
   efforts as part of the project as well as extensive back-ground and
   expertise in urban greening. No other individuals affiliated funding
   organizations were involved in the study design, data collection,
   analyses, or interpretation of this work. Matthew Browning's
   contribu-tions to the Green Heart Project, including this project, were
   also part a larger project investigating canopy cover and healthcare
   expenditures funded by the USDA Forest Service's Urban and Community
   Forest Grant Program as recommended by the National Urban and Community
   Advisory Council (16-DG-11132544-036 and 20-DG-11132544-057). Lincoln
   Larson's contribution to this project was also funded in part by the
   USDA Forest Service's Urban and Community Forest Grant Program as
   recommended by the National Urban and Community Advisory Council
   (20-DG-11132544-033).
CR Allegretto G, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127664
   [Anonymous], 2023, ESRI LIVING ATLAS PD
   Becker D.A., 2021, CITY ENV INTERACTION, V11
   Breyer B, 2023, LOCAL ENVIRON, V28, P1082, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2023.2184784
   Brown SC, 2016, AM J PREV MED, V51, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.008
   Browning M, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14070675
   Browning MHEM, 2019, ENVIRON RES, V176, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2019.04.016
   Carmichael CE, 2019, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V32, P588, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2018.1550229
   Chiabai A, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V635, P1191, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.323
   Davis AY, 2016, APPL GEOGR, V71, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.04.010
   de Vries S, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12155889
   Donovan Geoffrey H., 2014, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, V40, P70
   Duncan GJ, 2002, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V92, P1151, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.92.7.1151
   Eldridge M., 2019, INVESTING EQUITABLE
   Iungman T., 2023, LANCET
   Hernández HJ, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V29, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.10.017
   James Peter, 2015, Curr Epidemiol Rep, V2, P131
   Jefferson County Property Valuation Administrator Office, 2018, PROP VAL REC CURR PR
   Klingberg J, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V26, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.011
   Klompmaker J.O., 2023, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V131
   Labib SM, 2020, ENVIRON RES, V180, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108869
   Lantz PM, 2010, PREV CHRONIC DIS, V7
   Larson LR, 2022, ENVIRON RES, V204, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112367
   Locke DH, 2018, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V31, P1169, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2018.1481549
   Locke DH, 2016, APPL SPAT ANAL POLIC, V9, P77, DOI 10.1007/s12061-014-9131-1
   McDermott ER, 2018, J APPL DEV PSYCHOL, V56, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.appdev.2018.03.002
   Nero BF, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10103417
   Nesbitt L, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V181, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.007
   Nesbitt L, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V34, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.009
   Nigussie S, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107026
   Nowak DJ, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V41, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.014
   Oscilowicz E., 2021, Policy and Planning Tools for Urban Green Justice: Fighting Displacement and Gentrification and Improving Accessibility and Inclusiveness to Green Amenities
   Ossola A, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V185, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.014
   Ossola Alessandro, 2018, Cities Environ, V11, P1
   Remme RP, 2021, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V118, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2018472118
   Riedman E, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V73, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127597
   Rigolon A, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V153, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.017
   Roman LA, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P1174, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.001
   Sathyakumar V, 2019, GISCI REMOTE SENS, V56, P645, DOI 10.1080/15481603.2018.1549819
   Schwarz K, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0122051
   Shackleton CM, 2014, LAND USE POLICY, V36, P500, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.10.002
   Spahr KM, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126548
   Tubridy D, 2020, GEOFORUM, V113, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.04.020
   United States Census Bureau, AM COMM SURV 2021 5
   Van den Eeden SK, 2022, ENVIRON INT, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107174
   Villeneuve PJ, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15081719
   Vogt JM, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V136, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.11.021
   Wan C., 2021, CITY CULTURE SOC, V24, P100383, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2021.100383, 10.1016/j.ccs.2021.100383]
   Watkins SL, 2017, ENVIRON BEHAV, V49, P452, DOI 10.1177/0013916516636423
   Wolch JR, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
   Xi C, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101393
   Yan~ez E., 2021, CHANGING LANDSCAPE P
   Yeager RA, 2020, TRENDS CARDIOVAS MED, V30, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.tcm.2019.06.005
   Zabret K, 2019, CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, V47, DOI 10.1002/clen.201800327
   Zhang JG, 2023, BUILD ENVIRON, V227, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109799
   Zhou WQ, 2009, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V22, P744, DOI 10.1080/08941920802074330
NR 56
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 7
U2 23
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0160-4120
EI 1873-6750
J9 ENVIRON INT
JI Environ. Int.
PD JUN
PY 2023
VL 176
AR 107955
DI 10.1016/j.envint.2023.107955
EA MAY 2023
PG 10
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA I4DH3
UT WOS:001002295300001
PM 37196566
OA Green Published, Green Accepted, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Das, M
   Das, A
   Momin, S
AF Das, Manob
   Das, Arijit
   Momin, Sahil
TI Quantifying the cooling effect of urban green space: A case from urban
   parks in a tropical mega metropolitan area (India)
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban heat island; Urban green space; Kolkata metropolitan area; Thermal
   comfort; Cooling effect
ID LAND-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; HEAT-ISLAND; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; THERMAL
   ENVIRONMENT; CLIMATE ADAPTATION; VEGETATION INDEX; USE/LAND COVER;
   IMPACT; CITY; MITIGATION
AB Green space (GS) plays a crucial role in reducing the urban heat island (UHI) effect and helps in mitigating climate change. In Indian cities, GS are highly vulnerable due to rapid urbanization and infrastructural devel-opment. This study aims to assess the cooling effect of urban parks such as GS on the thermal environment in Kolkata Metropolitan Area (KMA), India. Five urban parks were selected from different parts of KMA for the assessment during the summer season. Three greenness indices (normalized difference vegetation index, enhanced vegetation index and soil adjusted vegetation index) and two thermal indices (land surface tempera-ture and temperature condition index) were used to find out the cooling effect on the thermal environment. Relative land surface temperature (RLST) and vegetation cooling index (VCI) was developed for a better un-derstanding of the relationship between greenness on the thermal environment. Correlation and regression analysis was also performed to show the relationship as well the effect of greenness parameters on thermal conditions. From the result, it was found that urban parks had a substantial impact on the cooling effect. (i) Botanical Park was the coldest park with an average LST of 33.55 degrees C, followed by Nicco park (34.33 degrees C), Nature park (34.48 degrees C), Rabindra Sarabor (34.55 degrees C), and Central Park (36.65 degrees C) (ii) RLST had a negative correlation with PV (R =-0.51 for Botanical Park; R=-0.65 for Nature park; R=-0.57 for Central park) and (iii) finally, greenness had a negative impact on the thermal pattern in KMA (R =-0.16). Thus, from the results, it was documented that urban parks (as GS) had CA on the surrounding areas. Therefore, the conservation of GS is essential to achieving sustainable development goals (particularly goals-3, 11, 13, and 15).
C1 [Das, Manob; Das, Arijit; Momin, Sahil] Univ Gour Banga, Dept Geog, Malda, West Bengal, India.
C3 University of Gour Banga
RP Das, A (corresponding author), Univ Gour Banga, Dept Geog, Malda, West Bengal, India.
EM arijit3333@gmail.com
RI Das, Arijit/AAC-2784-2021; Das, Dr. Manob/ADB-7695-2022
OI Das, Manob/0000-0002-7264-0256; Das, Arijit/0000-0002-8088-2255
CR Acharya P, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15020247
   Adjei CollinsMensah., 2014, AM J ENV PROTECTION, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.11648/J.AJEP.20140301.11
   Akbari H, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V133, P834, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.09.067
   Andersson E, 2019, BIOSCIENCE, V69, P566, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biz058
   Anjos M, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9081379
   Aram F, 2019, HELIYON, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01339
   Arshad A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101468
   Azevedo JA, 2016, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/rs8020153
   Balogun IA, 2019, SPAT INF RES, V27, P23, DOI 10.1007/s41324-018-0219-6
   Sosa MB, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V32, P547, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.05.003
   Bertram C, 2015, ECOL ECON, V120, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.013
   Biswas S, 2022, INT J URBAN SCI, V26, P604, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2021.1997633
   Bokaie M, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V23, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.03.009
   Brown RD, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V138, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.006
   Buyantuyev A, 2010, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V25, P17, DOI 10.1007/s10980-009-9402-4
   Byomkesh T, 2012, LANDSC ECOL ENG, V8, P45, DOI 10.1007/s11355-010-0147-7
   Cai YB, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13179638
   Cai YB, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V41, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.04.012
   Cao X, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V96, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.03.008
   Chen AL, 2014, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V13, P646, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.07.006
   Chibuike Ekwe Michael, 2018, Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, V11, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.rsase.2018.04.006
   Chow WTL, 2011, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V103, P197, DOI 10.1007/s00704-010-0293-8
   Cohen P, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V51, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.020
   Cruz JA, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103184
   Das M, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V63, DOI [10.1016/j.scs.2020.102433, 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101474]
   Derkzen ML, 2017, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V29, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.10.001
   Dinda S, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107178
   Doick KJ, 2014, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V493, P662, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.048
   Dronova I, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V34, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.05.009
   Du HY, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V27, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.06.008
   Eggermont H, 2015, GAIA, V24, P243, DOI 10.14512/gaia.24.4.9
   Ekwe MC, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P10056, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-01046-9
   El-Zein A, 2015, ECOL INDIC, V48, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.012
   Erell E, 2017, ADV 21ST CENT HUMAN, P73, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-4113-6_4
   Feyisa GL, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V123, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.008
   Gao L, 2020, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V159, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.11.018
   Ghosh K., 2017, Int. Adv. Res. J. Sci. Eng. Technol, V4, P86, DOI [10.17148/IARJSET.2017.4714, DOI 10.17148/IARJSET.2017.4714]
   Ghosh S, 2018, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V4, P501, DOI 10.1007/s40808-018-0456-7
   Ghosh S, 2019, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V5, P307, DOI 10.1007/s40808-018-0535-9
   Gkatsopoulos P, 2017, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V38, P477, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.139
   Golechha M, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100934
   Gómez-Baggethun E, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019
   Gomez-Martinez F, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10020155
   Govindarajulu D, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V10, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2014.09.006
   Haaland C, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P760, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.009
   Halder B, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103186
   Han Y, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12030530
   Heaviside Clare, 2017, Curr Environ Health Rep, V4, P296, DOI 10.1007/s40572-017-0150-3
   Huang CH, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10101569
   Huete A, 2002, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V83, P195, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2
   Imam AUK, 2016, AMBIO, V45, P442, DOI 10.1007/s13280-015-0763-4
   Jabbar M, 2022, GEOJOURNAL, V87, P4405, DOI 10.1007/s10708-021-10474-7
   Jenerette GD, 2016, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V31, P745, DOI 10.1007/s10980-015-0284-3
   Jiang ZY, 2008, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V112, P3833, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.006
   Kadaverugu Rakesh, 2021, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, V14, DOI 10.1007/s12517-020-06380-w
   Ke XL, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127159
   Kim JS, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13020272
   Klemm W, 2015, BUILD ENVIRON, V83, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.05.013
   Klok L, 2012, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V64, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.01.009
   Ko H, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V91, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.006
   Kong FH, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V128, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.018
   Kumar P, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V818, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151788
   Lahoti S, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11072166
   Lau SS, 2012, INT J LOW-CARBON TEC, V7, P215, DOI 10.1093/ijlct/cts033
   Lee ACK, 2015, RISK MANAG HEALTHC P, V8, P131, DOI 10.2147/RMHP.S61654
   Li Y, 2015, NAT COMMUN, V6, DOI 10.1038/ncomms7603
   Liu OY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102772
   Maghrabi A, 2021, FORESTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/f12050629
   Majumdar D, 2020, ATMOS ENVIRON, V222, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117135
   Mandal J, 2019, J INDIAN SOC REMOTE, V47, P1707, DOI 10.1007/s12524-019-01020-7
   Masoudi M, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100743
   Matos P, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V665, P521, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.023
   Middel A, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.09.010
   Miner A., 2016, P 4 INT C HUM AG INT, P123, DOI [DOI 10.1145/2974804.2974820, 10.1145/2974804.2974820]
   NASA, 2016, LANDSAT 8 L8 DATA US
   Nath TK, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V36, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.013
   Nichol JE, 2009, ATMOS RES, V94, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.06.011
   Niemelä J, 2010, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V19, P3225, DOI 10.1007/s10531-010-9888-8
   Nimish G, 2020, REMOTE SENS APPL, V18, DOI 10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100299
   Nouri H, 2020, HYDROL PROCESS, V34, P3183, DOI 10.1002/hyp.13790
   O'Malley C, 2015, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V19, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2015.05.009
   Oke T. R., 2017, Urban Climates, DOI [10.1017/9781139016476, DOI 10.1017/9781139016476]
   Oliveira S, 2011, BUILD ENVIRON, V46, P2186, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.04.034
   Park J, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V21, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.12.005
   Pawe CK, 2018, GEOGR TIDSSKR-DEN, V118, P88, DOI 10.1080/00167223.2017.1405357
   Pulighe G, 2016, ECOSYST SERV, V22, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.004
   Rahaman M., 2018, Applications and Challenges of Geospatial Technology: Potential Future Trends, P205
   Ramaiah M, 2019, URBAN SCI, V3, DOI 10.3390/urbansci3030094
   Rhyma PP, 2020, REMOTE SENS APPL, V17, DOI 10.1016/j.rsase.2019.100280
   Rosenzweig DH, 2017, EUR CELLS MATER, V33, P240, DOI 10.22203/eCM.v033a18
   Sahana M, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V628-629, P1557, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.170
   Shafia A., 2018, P IOP C SER EARTH EN, V169
   Shah A, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V209, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104043
   Shan W, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V239, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118126
   Shi Y, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V771, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145381
   Siddique G, 2022, GEOJOURNAL, V87, P1299, DOI 10.1007/s10708-020-10312-2
   Skelhorn C, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V121, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.012
   Song PH, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12041630
   Sun CY, 2011, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V106, P433, DOI 10.1007/s00704-011-0444-6
   Sun FY, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V38, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.11.012
   Sun RH, 2017, ECOSYST SERV, V23, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.011
   Sun SB, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V123, P277, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.010
   Sun X, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126838
   Tripathy P, 2019, CITIES, V90, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.021
   Twohig-Bennett C, 2018, ENVIRON RES, V166, P628, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.030
   Wang KY, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11020190
   Wang ZH, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103581
   Wang ZF, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127233
   Waseem S, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V234, P972, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.228
   Wende HEW, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V107, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.003
   Weng QH, 2004, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V89, P467, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.005
   Wlodarczyk-Marciniak R, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102236
   Wu CY, 2021, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2021.657969
   Xue JR, 2017, J SENSORS, V2017, DOI 10.1155/2017/1353691
   Yan H, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V622, P882, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.327
   Yan L, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13224601
   Yang CB, 2017, FORESTS, V8, DOI 10.3390/f8050153
   Yu ZW, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V82, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.002
   Yuan XL, 2021, INT J CLIMATOL, V41, P483, DOI 10.1002/joc.6633
   Zasada I, 2020, URBAN ECOSYST, V23, P403, DOI 10.1007/s11252-019-00921-2
   Zhang B, 2014, BUILD ENVIRON, V76, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.003
NR 121
TC 45
Z9 45
U1 15
U2 124
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD DEC
PY 2022
VL 87
AR 104062
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104062
EA SEP 2022
PG 14
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA 5D5ZN
UT WOS:000865019500002
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Kichamu-Wachira, E
   Xu, ZH
   Reardon-Smith, K
   Biggs, D
   Wachira, G
   Omidvar, N
AF Kichamu-Wachira, Edith
   Xu, Zhihong
   Reardon-Smith, Kathryn
   Biggs, Duan
   Wachira, Geoffrey
   Omidvar, Negar
TI Effects of climate-smart agricultural practices on crop yields, soil
   carbon, and nitrogen pools in Africa: a meta-analysis
SO JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate mitigation; Climate adaptation; Green manure; Conservation
   tillage; Crop residue
ID WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; ORGANIC-CARBON; GREEN MANURE; CONSERVATION
   AGRICULTURE; REDUCED TILLAGE; ELEVATED CO2; LAND-USE; MANAGEMENT;
   FERTILIZER; AVAILABILITY
AB Purpose Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices have been advanced as an alternative to conventional farming practices due to their importance in climate mitigation and soil quality improvement, while also enhancing food production. However, few studies have quantitatively investigated the effects of a range of CSA practices on crop yield, soil carbon, and nitrogen pools. This study adds to this limited body of work by synthesizing such studies and evaluates the effect of individual and combinations of widely implemented CSA practices in Africa-green manure (GM), conservation tillage (no-tillage, reduced tillage), and crop residue retention (CR)-on food crop yield, soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration, and soil total nitrogen (TN). Materials and methods This study conducted a meta-analysis of results reported in 60 peer-reviewed articles to examine the effects of CSA management (GM, CR, and conservation tillage) on crop yield, SOC concentration, and soil TN in Africa. Results and discussion The implementation of CSA practices significantly increased crop yield and SOC concentrations (mean effect 9.2% and 14.7%, respectively), although no significant change was evident in soil TN. In terms of yield increase, GM was the most effective practice, increasing yield by 63.5%, followed by CR (5.8%). Conservation tillage and CR increased SOC by 16.4% and 13%, respectively, but no significant difference was observed with GM. Further analysis suggested that integrating CSA practices (conservation tillage and GM; conservation tillage and CR) had a more pronounced effect on both SOC concentration and yield under lower nitrogen fertilizer levels. Conclusion Our meta-analysis showed that CSA management resulted in higher yields and SOC concentrations, thus suggesting the importance of CSA practices in enhancing food production and climate mitigation in Africa. It also highlights the potential of the integration of CSA practices to improve SOC and TN pools and consequently crop productivity.
C1 [Kichamu-Wachira, Edith; Xu, Zhihong; Biggs, Duan; Omidvar, Negar] Griffith Univ, Sch Environm & Sci, Environm Futures Res Inst, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia.
   [Reardon-Smith, Kathryn] Univ Southern Queensland, Ctr Appl Climate Sci, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia.
   [Wachira, Geoffrey] Univ Queensland, Sch Agr & Food Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
C3 Griffith University; University of Southern Queensland; University of
   Queensland
RP Kichamu-Wachira, E (corresponding author), Griffith Univ, Sch Environm & Sci, Environm Futures Res Inst, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia.
EM edith.kichamu@griffithuni.edu.au
RI Biggs, Duan/F-9445-2011; Xu, Zhihong/B-3223-2009
OI Xu, Zhihong/0000-0002-6768-0720; Biggs, Duan/0000-0003-3177-4677
FU Griffith University Postgraduate Research Scholarship; Australian
   Government Research Training Program Scholarship
FX We would like to acknowledge the authors of the publications used in
   this meta-analysis. The authors would also like to acknowledge Dr.
   Shahla Hosseini Bai for providing access to the software for analyzing
   the data. The first author would like to acknowledge the financial
   support received through the Griffith University Postgraduate Research
   Scholarship and an Australian Government Research Training Program
   Scholarship in conducting this study.
CR Abbasi MK, 2015, SOLID EARTH, V6, P197, DOI 10.5194/se-6-197-2015
   Adams AM, 2020, GEODERMA, V366, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114207
   Anyanzwa H, 2010, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V88, P39, DOI 10.1007/s10705-008-9210-2
   Aryal JP, 2018, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V10, P407, DOI [10.1108/IJCCSM-02-2017-0025, 10.1108/ijccsm-02-2017-0025]
   Asrat P, 2017, CLIM CHANG MANAG, P45, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-49520-0_4
   Bai XX, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P2591, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14658
   Baltas E, 2007, METEOROL APPL, V14, P69, DOI 10.1002/met.7
   Bharali A, 2017, SOIL TILL RES, V168, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2016.12.001
   Chen BQ, 2014, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V34, P429, DOI 10.1007/s13593-014-0207-8
   Cherr CM, 2006, AGRON J, V98, P302, DOI 10.2134/agronj2005.0035
   Chivenge P, 2009, AGRON J, V101, P1266, DOI 10.2134/agronj2008.0188x
   Corbeels M, 2020, NAT FOOD, V1, DOI 10.1038/s43016-020-0114-x
   Croitoru AE, 2013, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V112, P597, DOI 10.1007/s00704-012-0755-2
   Dalal RC, 2011, SOIL TILL RES, V112, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2010.12.006
   FAO, 2013, CLIMATE SMART AGR SO
   FAO, 2009, FOOD SECURITY AGR MI
   Field CB., 2014, REGIONAL ASPECTS B
   Fu L, 2020, ENVIRON INT, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105209
   Fuhrer J, 2003, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V97, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00125-7
   Funk C., 2012, Remote Sensing of Drought: Innovative Monitoring Approaches, P331, DOI DOI 10.1201/B11863
   Garcia-Franco N, 2015, SOIL TILL RES, V153, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2015.05.010
   Gattinger A, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P18226, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1209429109
   Gentile R, 2009, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V131, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2009.02.003
   Ghosh PK, 2016, AGR RES, V5, P261, DOI 10.1007/s40003-016-0215-9
   Huang S, 2013, FIELD CROP RES, V154, P188, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.08.013
   Jain S, 2007, POLICY RES WORKING P
   Jat HS, 2019, CATENA, V181, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2019.05.005
   Kabubo-Mariara J, 2007, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V57, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.01.002
   Khatri-Chhetri A, 2017, AGR SYST, V151, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.10.005
   Kimaro AA, 2016, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V105, P217, DOI 10.1007/s10705-015-9711-8
   Kimetu JM, 2004, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V68, P127, DOI 10.1023/B:FRES.0000019043.33580.a6
   Lal R., 2005, CLIMATE CHANGE GLOBA, DOI [10.1201/9781420028614, DOI 10.1201/9781420028614]
   Lenka NK, 2013, SOIL TILL RES, V126, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2012.08.011
   Li T, 2019, SOIL TILL RES, V195, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2019.104428
   Li Y, 2019, SOIL TILL RES, V194, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2019.06.009
   Lipper L, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P1068, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2437, 10.1038/nclimate2437]
   Liu C, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P1366, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12517
   Lu XL, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0231740
   Vicente-Vicente JL, 2016, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V235, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.024
   Luo YQ, 2006, ECOLOGY, V87, P53, DOI 10.1890/04-1724
   Luo ZK, 2010, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V139, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2010.08.006
   Maharjan K. L., 2013, Climate change, agriculture and rural livelihoods in developing countries, DOI [10.1007/978-4-431-54343-5, DOI 10.1007/978-4-431-54343-5]
   Masvaya EN, 2017, SOIL TILL RES, V168, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2016.12.007
   Micheni AN, 2016, EXP AGR, V52, P51, DOI 10.1017/S0014479714000556
   Mtyobile M, 2020, SOIL WATER RES, V15, P47, DOI 10.17221/176/2018-SWR
   Mujuru L, 2013, GEODERMA, V209, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.025
   Mupangwa W, 2013, J ARID ENVIRON, V91, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.11.007
   Naab JB, 2017, FRONT PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.00996
   Nafi E, 2020, SOIL TILL RES, V196, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2019.104473
   Nziguheba G, 2000, BIOL FERT SOILS, V32, P328, DOI 10.1007/s003740000256
   Ogle SM, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-47861-7
   Ouédraogo E, 2006, SOIL TILL RES, V91, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2005.11.004
   Rosenberg M. S., 2000, METAWIN STAT SOFTWAR, DOI DOI 10.1086/420179
   Sithole NJ, 2019, SOIL TILL RES, V194, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2019.104317
   Smith P, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P219, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14815
   Song XD, 2019, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V269, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2018.09.034
   Steenwerth KL., 2014, AGR FOOD SECURITY, V3, P1, DOI [10.1186/2048-7010-3-11, DOI 10.1186/2048-7010-3-11]
   Succarie A, 2020, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V20, P3607, DOI 10.1007/s11368-020-02734-9
   Sun FF, 2010, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V10, P1453, DOI 10.1007/s11368-010-0249-8
   Thierfelder C, 2013, SOIL TILL RES, V126, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2012.09.002
   Wheeler T, 2013, SCIENCE, V341, P508, DOI 10.1126/science.1239402
   Xu J, 2019, FIELD CROP RES, V233, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.016
   Xu Y, 2014, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V14, P917, DOI 10.1007/s11368-014-0878-4
   Xu ZH, 2009, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V9, P83, DOI 10.1007/s11368-009-0060-6
   Zhang DB, 2019, GEODERMA, V337, P425, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.09.053
   Zhang YJ, 2017, FIELD CROP RES, V209, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.002
   Zhao X, 2020, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V31, P694, DOI 10.1002/ldr.3492
   Zhao X, 2017, EUR J AGRON, V84, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2016.11.009
NR 68
TC 16
Z9 19
U1 10
U2 111
PU SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
PI HEIDELBERG
PA TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
SN 1439-0108
EI 1614-7480
J9 J SOIL SEDIMENT
JI J. Soils Sediments
PD APR
PY 2021
VL 21
IS 4
BP 1587
EP 1597
DI 10.1007/s11368-021-02885-3
EA FEB 2021
PG 11
WC Environmental Sciences; Soil Science
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Agriculture
GA RM8QT
UT WOS:000613844200001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Smart, LS
   Taillie, PJ
   Poulter, B
   Vukomanovic, J
   Singh, KK
   Swenson, JJ
   Mitasova, H
   Smith, JW
   Meentemeyer, RK
AF Smart, Lindsey S.
   Taillie, Paul J.
   Poulter, Benjamin
   Vukomanovic, Jelena
   Singh, Kunwar K.
   Swenson, Jennifer J.
   Mitasova, Helena
   Smith, Jordan W.
   Meentemeyer, Ross K.
TI Aboveground carbon loss associated with the spread of ghost forests as
   sea levels rise
SO ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
LA English
DT Article
DE ghost forests; sea level rise; saltwater intrusion; LiDAR; aboveground
   carbon
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; LANDWARD MIGRATION; HUMAN IMPACTS; WEST-COAST; WETLANDS;
   FLORIDA; DROUGHT; BIOMASS; DRIVEN; TRANSITION
AB Coastal forests sequester and store more carbon than their terrestrial counterparts but are at greater risk of conversion due to sea level rise. Saltwater intrusion from sea level rise converts freshwater-dependent coastal forests to more salt-tolerant marshes, leaving 'ghost forests' of standing dead trees behind. Although recent research has investigated the drivers and rates of coastal forest decline, the associated changes in carbon storage across large extents have not been quantified. We mapped ghost forest spread across coastal North Carolina, USA, using repeat Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) surveys, multi-temporal satellite imagery, and field measurements of aboveground biomass to quantify changes in aboveground carbon. Between 2001 and 2014, 15% (167 km(2)) of unmanaged public land in the region changed from coastal forest to transition-ghost forest characterized by salt-tolerant shrubs and herbaceous plants. Salinity and proximity to the estuarine shoreline were significant drivers of these changes. This conversion resulted in a net aboveground carbon decline of 0.13 +/- 0.01 TgC. Because saltwater intrusion precedes inundation and influences vegetation condition in advance of mature tree mortality, we suggest that aboveground carbon declines can be used to detect the leading edge of sea level rise. Aboveground carbon declines along the shoreline were offset by inland aboveground carbon gains associated with natural succession and forestry activities like planting (2.46 +/- 0.25 TgC net aboveground carbon across study area). Our study highlights the combined effects of saltwater intrusion and land use on aboveground carbon dynamics of temperate coastal forests in North America. By quantifying the effects of multiple interacting disturbances, our measurement and mapping methods should be applicable to other coastal landscapes experiencing saltwater intrusion. As sea level rise increases the landward extent of inundation and saltwater exposure, investigations at these large scales are requisite for effective resource allocation for climate adaptation. In this changing environment, human intervention, whether through land preservation, restoration, or reforestation, may be necessary to prevent aboveground carbon loss.
C1 [Smart, Lindsey S.; Vukomanovic, Jelena; Mitasova, Helena; Meentemeyer, Ross K.] North Carolina State Univ, Ctr Geospatial Analyt, 2800 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA.
   [Taillie, Paul J.] Univ Florida, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Conservat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.
   [Poulter, Benjamin] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Biospher Sci Lab, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA.
   [Vukomanovic, Jelena] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Parks Recreat & Tourism Management, 2800 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA.
   [Singh, Kunwar K.] Coll William & Mary, Inst Global Res, AidData, 424 Scotland St, Williamsburg, VA 23185 USA.
   [Singh, Kunwar K.] Coll William & Mary, Ctr Geospatial Anal, 400 Landrum Dr, Williamsburg, VA 23185 USA.
   [Swenson, Jennifer J.] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, 9 Circuit Dr, Durham, NC 27710 USA.
   [Mitasova, Helena] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Marine Earth & Atmospher Sci, 2800 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA.
   [Smith, Jordan W.] Utah State Univ, Dept Environm & Soc, 5215 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 USA.
   [Meentemeyer, Ross K.] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, 2800 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA.
C3 North Carolina State University; State University System of Florida;
   University of Florida; National Aeronautics & Space Administration
   (NASA); NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; North Carolina State
   University; William & Mary; William & Mary; Duke University; North
   Carolina State University; Utah System of Higher Education; Utah State
   University; North Carolina State University
RP Smart, LS (corresponding author), North Carolina State Univ, Ctr Geospatial Analyt, 2800 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA.
EM lssmart@ncsu.edu
RI Mitasova, Helena/Y-8222-2019; Poulter, Ben/ABB-5886-2021; Smith,
   Jordan/AAR-9126-2021; Singh, Kunwar/K-4432-2017; Smart,
   Lindsey/ADN-3370-2022
OI VUKOMANOVIC, JELENA/0000-0001-6477-6551; Singh,
   Kunwar/0000-0002-9788-1822; Smart, Lindsey/0000-0002-1366-6528; Swenson,
   Jennifer J./0000-0002-2069-667X; Poulter, Benjamin/0000-0002-9493-8600;
   Meentemeyer, Ross/0000-0002-1247-6212; Taillie,
   Paul/0000-0001-7172-3589; Smith, Jordan/0000-0001-7036-4887; Mitasova,
   Helena/0000-0002-6906-3398
FU NOAA's North Carolina Sea Grant Program; NASA's North Carolina Space
   Grant Program [NA14OAR4170073, NNX15AH81H]; College of Natural Resources
   Innovation Grant at NC State University; NASA [NNX15AH81H, 804889]
   Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
FX This research was funded by a joint fellowship through NOAA's North
   Carolina Sea Grant Program and NASA's North Carolina Space Grant Program
   (NOAA award #NA14OAR4170073, NASA award #NNX15AH81H). Funding from a
   College of Natural Resources Innovation Grant at NC State University was
   also used to support this research.
CR [Anonymous], 1995, COASTAL WETLAND DYNA
   [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being: Desertification synthesis
   [Anonymous], 2007, ECOLOGY TIDAL FRESHW
   Archer E, 2018, RFPERMUTE R PACKAGE
   Ardón M, 2016, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V127, P411, DOI 10.1007/s10533-016-0189-5
   Ardón M, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P2976, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12287
   Barbier EB, 2011, ECOL MONOGR, V81, P169, DOI 10.1890/10-1510.1
   Bender MA, 2010, SCIENCE, V327, P454, DOI 10.1126/science.1180568
   Bhattachan A, 2018, ELEMENTA-SCI ANTHROP, V6, DOI 10.1525/elementa.316
   Bivand R, 2017, SPDEP R PACKAGE VERS
   Borchert SM, 2018, J APPL ECOL, V55, P2876, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.13169
   Breiman L., 2001, Machine Learning, V45, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Brienen RJW, 2015, NATURE, V519, P344, DOI 10.1038/nature14283
   BRINSON MM, 1995, ESTUARIES, V18, P648, DOI 10.2307/1352383
   Byrd KB, 2018, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V139, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.03.019
   Castillo JM, 2008, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V78, P819, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2008.02.021
   Chen HYH, 2016, ECOL LETT, V19, P1150, DOI 10.1111/ele.12653
   Church J.A., 2013, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
   Church JA, 2011, SURV GEOPHYS, V32, P585, DOI 10.1007/s10712-011-9119-1
   Craft CB, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P3615, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12009
   Dangendorf S, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P5946, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1616007114
   Desantis LRG, 2007, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V13, P2349, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01440.x
   Duarte CM, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P862, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0177-4
   Emadi M, 2014, ARCH AGRON SOIL SCI, V60, P1315, DOI 10.1080/03650340.2014.880837
   Environmental Protection Agency, 2017, STORAGE RETRIEVAL WA
   Enwright NM, 2016, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V14, P307, DOI 10.1002/fee.1282
   Erwin KL, 2009, WETL ECOL MANAG, V17, P71, DOI 10.1007/s11273-008-9119-1
   Evans J.S., 2018, _rfUtilities_. R package version 2.1-3
   Evans JS, 2011, PREDICTIVE SPECIES AND HABITAT MODELING IN LANDSCAPE ECOLOOGY: CONCEPTS AND APPLICATIONS, P139, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7390-0_8
   Evans JS, 2009, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V24, P673, DOI 10.1007/s10980-009-9341-0
   Field CR, 2016, BIOL CONSERV, V201, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.035
   Frost C.C., 1995, FIRE WETLANDS, P39
   Gibbon A, 2010, ECOSYSTEMS, V13, P1097, DOI 10.1007/s10021-010-9376-8
   Trilla GG, 2009, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V85, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.07.034
   Google Earth Engine, 2018, PLAN SCAL PLATF EART
   Hackney C T., 1990, Wetland ecology and management: case studies, P55, DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-2115-3_7
   Hamilton SE, 2016, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V25, P729, DOI 10.1111/geb.12449
   He Q, 2019, CURR BIOL, V29, pR1021, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.042
   Helton AM, 2019, ECOSYSTEMS, V22, P1108, DOI 10.1007/s10021-018-0325-2
   Henman J, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V113, DOI 10.1029/2006JG000395
   Herbert ER, 2015, ECOSPHERE, V6, DOI 10.1890/ES14-00534.1
   Hudak AT, 2008, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V112, P2232, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2007.10.009
   Hudak AT, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V123, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2012.02.023
   Hudak AT, 2009, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V1, P934, DOI 10.3390/rs1040934
   Jenkins JC, 2003, FOREST SCI, V49, P12
   Karegar MA, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-11544-y
   Karegar MA, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P3126, DOI 10.1002/2016GL068015
   Kirschbaum MUF, 2012, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V150, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2012.01.004
   Kirwan ML, 2007, J COASTAL RES, V23, P457, DOI 10.2112/04-0211.1
   Kirwan ML, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P450, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0488-7
   Kirwan ML, 2013, NATURE, V504, P53, DOI 10.1038/nature12856
   Krauss K. W., 2009, Wetland Science and Practice, V26, P18
   Krauss KW, 2018, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V32, P817, DOI 10.1029/2018GB005897
   Krauss KW, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-01224-2
   Krauss Ken W., 2007, P385, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-5095-4_14
   Lagomasino D, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaf0de
   Langston AK, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P5383, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13805
   Law BE, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P3663, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1720064115
   Liaw A., 2018, RANDOMFOREST
   Manda AK, 2014, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V71, P4409, DOI 10.1007/s12665-013-2834-9
   Martin AR, 2018, NAT GEOSCI, V11, P915, DOI 10.1038/s41561-018-0246-x
   Mcleod E, 2011, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V9, P552, DOI 10.1890/110004
   McNulty Steve., 2015, SE REGIONAL CLIMATE
   MOORHEAD KK, 1995, ECOL APPL, V5, P261, DOI 10.2307/1942068
   Moorman CE, 1999, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V118, P37, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00482-4
   National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2012, 2001 NCFMP LID PHAS
   National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2014, 2014 NCFMP LID PHAS
   Noe GB, 2016, ESTUAR COAST, V39, P1006, DOI 10.1007/s12237-016-0066-4
   North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, 2017, GEOGR INF SYST GIS D
   Oliver M. A., 1990, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, V4, P313, DOI 10.1080/02693799008941549
   Pendleton L, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0043542
   Poulter B, 2006, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V111, DOI 10.1029/2005JD006455
   Poulter B, 2005, THESIS DUKE U DURHAM
   Poulter B, 2008, J HYDROL, V357, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.022
   Poulter B, 2009, PLANT ECOL, V202, P55, DOI 10.1007/s11258-008-9465-3
   Raabe EA, 2016, ESTUAR COAST, V39, P145, DOI 10.1007/s12237-015-9974-y
   Riegel JB, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0068251
   Roy DP, 2016, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V185, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.024
   Schieder NW, 2019, GEOLOGY, V47, P1151, DOI 10.1130/G46607.1
   Schieder NW, 2018, ESTUAR COAST, V41, P940, DOI 10.1007/s12237-017-0336-9
   Simard M, 2019, NAT GEOSCI, V12, P40, DOI 10.1038/s41561-018-0279-1
   Singh K K, 2018, HIGH SPATIAL RESOLUT, P71, DOI [10.1201/9780429470196, DOI 10.1201/9780429470196]
   Smart LS, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V281, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.020
   Smith W., 1983, Research Note NC-299
   Taillie PJ, 2019, ECOSYSTEMS, V22, P1918, DOI 10.1007/s10021-019-00382-w
   Thomas N, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0179302
   Tully K, 2019, BIOSCIENCE, V69, P368, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biz027
   Ury EA, 2020, ANN BOT-LONDON, V125, P255, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcz039
   US Geographical Survey, 2018, GLOVIS DAT WAR
   US Geological Survey (USGS), 2013, NAT HYDR GEOD NAT MA
   USDA Forest Service and US Geological Survey, 2017, MTBS DAT ACC FIR LEV
   White E, 2017, ECOSYST HEALTH SUST, V3, DOI 10.1002/ehs2.1258
   Williams K, 1998, AM J BOT, V85, P1745, DOI 10.2307/2446509
   Williams K, 1999, ECOLOGY, V80, P2045, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2045:SLRACF]2.0.CO;2
   Williams K., 1999, US Geological Survey, V1500, P20910
NR 95
TC 49
Z9 59
U1 9
U2 83
PU IOP Publishing Ltd
PI BRISTOL
PA TEMPLE CIRCUS, TEMPLE WAY, BRISTOL BS1 6BE, ENGLAND
SN 1748-9326
J9 ENVIRON RES LETT
JI Environ. Res. Lett.
PD OCT
PY 2020
VL 15
IS 10
AR 104028
DI 10.1088/1748-9326/aba136
PG 15
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA NV9NQ
UT WOS:000574639000001
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Pembleton, KG
   Cullen, BR
   Rawnsley, RP
   Ramilan, T
AF Pembleton, K. G.
   Cullen, B. R.
   Rawnsley, R. P.
   Ramilan, T.
TI Climate change effects on pasture-based dairy systems in south-eastern
   Australia
SO CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE biophysical modeling; climate adaptation; pasture based dairy systems
ID GROWN FORAGE CONSUMPTION; GLOBAL CHANGE IMPACTS; WATER-USE; APSIM;
   YIELD; AGRICULTURE; SIMULATION; EFFICIENCY; REGIONS; QUALITY
AB Increases in temperature, along with possible decreases in rainfall, will influence the production of forage on Australian dairy farms. A biophysical simulation study was undertaken to compare the performance of perennial pastures and annual forage cropping systems under a historical scenario and two possible future climate scenarios for three key dairy locations of south-eastern Australia. Pastures and forage-cropping systems were simulated with the biophysical models DairyMod and APSIM, respectively, for a location with a heavy reliance on irrigation (Dookie, Victoria), a location with a partial reliance on irrigation (Elliott, Tasmania), and a dryland location (Terang, Victoria). The historical climate scenario (baseline scenario) had no augmentation to climate data and an atmospheric CO2 concentration of 380 ppm, whereas the two future climate scenarios had either a 1 degrees C increase in temperatures (with an atmospheric CO2 concentration of 435 ppm) and a concurrent 10% decrease in rainfall, or a 2 degrees C increase in temperatures (with an atmospheric CO2 concentration of 535 ppm) and a concurrent 20% decrease in rainfall. At Dookie, mean annual dry matter yields of the forage-cropping options and the pasture systems increased under both future climate scenarios but more irrigation was required. At Terang, the yield of forage-cropping systems increased whereas the yield of the pasture systems decreased under the future climate scenarios. At Elliott, yields of irrigated pastures and cropping systems increased but there was minimal or a negative impact on yields of dryland pastures and cropping systems under the future climate scenarios. At all three locations, forage production increased in the colder months of the year with a decrease in production during the warmer months. This study indicates that double-cropping and irrigated-pasture systems at all three locations appear resilient to projected changes in climate; however, for irrigated systems this assumes a reliable supply of irrigation water. The systems implications of how a shift in the seasonality of forage supply within these options impacts on the farm system as a whole warrants further investigation.
C1 [Pembleton, K. G.] Univ Southern Queensland, Ctr Sustainable Agr Syst, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
   [Pembleton, K. G.] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Sci, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
   [Cullen, B. R.] Univ Melbourne, Fac Vet & Agr Sci, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia.
   [Rawnsley, R. P.] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Inst Agr, Private Bag 3523, Burnie, Tas 7320, Australia.
   [Ramilan, T.] Massey Univ, Sch Agr & Environm, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North 4417, New Zealand.
C3 University of Southern Queensland; University of Southern Queensland;
   University of Melbourne; University of Tasmania; Massey University
RP Pembleton, KG (corresponding author), Univ Southern Queensland, Ctr Sustainable Agr Syst, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.; Pembleton, KG (corresponding author), Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Sci, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
EM Keith.Pembleton@usq.edu.au
RI Ramilan, Thiagarajah/M-7296-2019; Pembleton, Keith/C-2401-2014
OI Pembleton, Keith/0000-0002-1896-4516; Rawnsley,
   Richard/0000-0001-5381-0208; Cullen, Brendan/0000-0003-2327-0946
FU Australian Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
FX The authors wish to acknowledge the advice from Dr Joe Jacobs, Dr
   Kithsiri Dassanayake, Mr Frank Mickan, Mr Greg O'Brien and Mr Roby
   Zeissig in the design of the forage crop systems simulated in this
   study. The authors gratefully acknowledge the Australian Department of
   Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry for its financial support for this
   study.
CR Alexander LV, 2009, INT J CLIMATOL, V29, P417, DOI 10.1002/joc.1730
   [Anonymous], 2007, P AUSTR DAIR SCI S M
   [Anonymous], 2002, AUSTR SOIL CLASSIFIC
   APSIM Initiative, 2009, APSOIL DAT VER 6 0
   Barlow R, 2008, NATL FEEDBASE STOCKT
   Chapman D. F., 2006, Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, V68, P255
   Chapman DF, 2008, AGR SYST, V97, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2008.02.001
   Chapman DF, 2014, ANIM PROD SCI, V54, P221, DOI 10.1071/AN12295
   Chapman DF, 2009, ANIM PROD SCI, V49, P1071, DOI 10.1071/AN09054
   Cheng L, 2011, J DAIRY SCI, V94, P2031, DOI 10.3168/jds.2010-3763
   Cullen BR, 2008, AUST J AGR RES, V59, P761, DOI 10.1071/AR07371
   Cullen BR, 2012, CROP PASTURE SCI, V63, P77, DOI 10.1071/CP11274
   Cullen BR, 2009, CROP PASTURE SCI, V60, P933, DOI 10.1071/CP09019
   Dillon P., 2005, P131
   Dolling PJ, 2005, AUST J AGR RES, V56, P503, DOI 10.1071/AR04216
   Fulkerson B., 2001, AUSTR DAIRY IND
   Garcia SC, 2008, GRASS FORAGE SCI, V63, P284, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2008.00636.x
   García SC, 2005, AUST J EXP AGR, V45, P1041, DOI 10.1071/EA04143
   Grose M, 2015, CLUSTER REPORTS
   Harle KJ, 2007, AGR SYST, V93, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2006.04.003
   Holzworth DP, 2014, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V62, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.07.009
   Howden SM, 2008, AUST J EXP AGR, V48, P780, DOI 10.1071/EA08033
   Jacobs JL, 1998, AUST J EXP AGR, V38, P219, DOI 10.1071/EA97151
   Jeffrey SJ, 2001, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V16, P309, DOI 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1
   Johnson IR, 2008, AUST J EXP AGR, V48, P621, DOI 10.1071/EA07133
   Johnson IR, 2003, AUST J EXP AGR, V43, P711, DOI 10.1071/EA02213
   Keating BA, 2003, EUR J AGRON, V18, P267, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00108-9
   Kimball BA, 2002, ADV AGRON, V77, P293, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2113(02)77017-X
   Lee JM, 2012, CROP PASTURE SCI, V63, P107, DOI 10.1071/CP11282
   Li FY, 2011, NEW ZEAL J AGR RES, V54, P331, DOI 10.1080/00288233.2011.613403
   Malcolm BJ, 2014, SOIL USE MANAGE, V30, P58, DOI 10.1111/sum.12101
   McKeon GM, 2009, RANGELAND J, V31, P1, DOI 10.1071/RJ08068
   McLeod AR, 1999, ADV ECOL RES, V28, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60028-8
   Pembleton KG, 2016, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V154, P1131, DOI 10.1017/S0021859615001185
   Pembleton KG, 2013, CROP PASTURE SCI, V64, P147, DOI 10.1071/CP12372
   Pembleton KG, 2011, CROP PASTURE SCI, V62, P610, DOI 10.1071/CP11094
   Pembleton KG, 2010, CROP PASTURE SCI, V61, P503, DOI 10.1071/CP09351
   Pembleton KG, 2010, CROP PASTURE SCI, V61, P493, DOI 10.1071/CP09269
   Potter NJ, 2010, J HYDROL, V381, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.025
   Rawnsley RP, 2013, ANIM PROD SCI, V53, P976, DOI 10.1071/AN12282
   Reilly J, 2003, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V57, P43, DOI 10.1023/A:1022103315424
   Reyenga PJ, 2001, ENVIRON INT, V27, P195, DOI 10.1016/S0160-4120(01)00082-4
   Reyenga PJ, 1999, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V14, P297, DOI 10.1016/S1364-8152(98)00081-4
   Robertson MJ, 2002, AUST J AGR RES, V53, P429, DOI 10.1071/AR01106
   Roche JR, 2009, ANIM PROD SCI, V49, P211, DOI 10.1071/EA07309
   Rogers MJ, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9122369
   Stockdale CR, 2010, ANIM PROD SCI, V50, P400, DOI 10.1071/AN09164
   Tharmaraj J, 2014, ANIM PROD SCI, V54, P234, DOI 10.1071/AN12296
   Thomson AM, 2006, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V114, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.001
   Wales WJ, 2017, ANIM PROD SCI, V57, P1366, DOI 10.1071/AN16828
   Wullschleger SD, 2002, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V25, P319, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00796.x
   ZADOKS JC, 1974, WEED RES, V14, P415, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x
   Zahid MS, 2003, SOLUTIONS BETTER ENV
NR 53
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 2
U2 26
PU CSIRO PUBLISHING
PI CLAYTON
PA UNIPARK, BLDG 1, LEVEL 1, 195 WELLINGTON RD, LOCKED BAG 10, CLAYTON, VIC
   3168, AUSTRALIA
SN 1836-0947
EI 1836-5795
J9 CROP PASTURE SCI
JI Crop Pasture Sci.
PY 2021
VL 72
IS 8-9
SI SI
BP 666
EP 677
DI 10.1071/CP20108
EA SEP 2020
PG 12
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA UE0OH
UT WOS:000571564600001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Tang, YY
   Van Kempen, MML
   Van der Heide, T
   Manschot, JJA
   Roelofs, JGM
   Lamers, LPM
   Smolders, AJP
AF Tang, Yingying
   Van Kempen, Monique M. L.
   Van der Heide, Tjisse
   Manschot, Johan J. A.
   Roelofs, Jan G. M.
   Lamers, Leon P. M.
   Smolders, Alfons J. P.
TI A tool for easily predicting short-term phosphorus mobilization from
   flooded soils
SO ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
LA English
DT Article
DE Eutrophication; Restoration; Water management; Flooding; Water storage;
   Riparian wetlands
ID ORGANIC-MATTER DECOMPOSITION; FRESH-WATER; AGRICULTURAL LANDS; PHOSPHATE
   RELEASE; RICH FENS; SEDIMENTS; EUTROPHICATION; RESTORATION; GROUNDWATER;
   EXCHANGE
AB The construction and restoration of riparian (temporarily flooded) wetlands as water storage and flood protection areas plays a central role in climate-adaptive water management. In general, arable and ex arable lands are used for this type of water storage. However, inundation may lead to problems, as excess phosphorus (P) stored in these soils may be released and result in the eutrophication of the overlying surface waters. Clearly, water and nature managers need to be able to determine for which areas temporary water storage would be a feasible option without causing eutrophication problems. Here, using a controlled experimental approach, a simple predictive tool for the P mobilization rates from soils upon short-term inundation has been developed. A large suite of soil characteristics and P mobilization rates were determined during flooding for different soil types (peat and sand), at two different depths to mimic topsoil removal (topsoils and soils from -30 to -60 cm below ground level), and at two temperatures to test seasonal influence (8 degrees C and 18 degrees C). Increasing the temperature from 8 to 18 degrees C almost tripled P mobilization rates, but the variation could not be linked to any of the soil characteristics measured - average Q(10) (temperature coefficient) values were 2.8 (2.9 for peaty soils, 2.6 for sandy soils). Although P mobilization was related to P saturation of amorphic Fe, water-extractable P was found to be by far the best predictor for short-term P mobilization rates, explaining 86.9% of the variation. The predictive tool for P mobilization after short-term rewetting is simple, low-cost and widely applicable, and can support water managers during their decision-making processes concerning the optimal location for the construction of water storage areas, the restoration of riparian wetlands, and the combinational use of different ecosystem services. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Tang, Yingying; Van Kempen, Monique M. L.; Van der Heide, Tjisse; Manschot, Johan J. A.; Roelofs, Jan G. M.; Lamers, Leon P. M.; Smolders, Alfons J. P.] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Aquat Ecol & Environm Biol, Inst Water & Wetland Res, POB 9010, NL-6500 GL Nijmegen, Netherlands.
   [Smolders, Alfons J. P.] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, B WARE Res Ctr, POB 6558, NL-6503 GB Nijmegen, Netherlands.
C3 Radboud University Nijmegen; Radboud University Nijmegen
RP Tang, YY (corresponding author), Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Aquat Ecol & Environm Biol, Inst Water & Wetland Res, POB 9010, NL-6500 GL Nijmegen, Netherlands.
EM y.tang@science.ru.nl
RI van der Heide, Tjisse/M-3000-2013; Roelofs, Jan/C-1243-2011; Smolders,
   Alfons/H-2583-2012; van Kempen, Monique/C-2269-2011; Lamers,
   Leon/A-8718-2012
FU China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201206140019]
FX We would like to thank Evi Verbaarschot, Gijs Van Dijk and Jose van
   Diggelen, Moni Poelen for their help to collect soils in the Netherlands
   and Ankie De Vries-Brock, Germa Verheggen, Paul Van der Ven, Roy Peters
   and Sebastian Krosse for their assistance with the chemical analyses.
   Yingying Tang is funded by China Scholarship Council (CSC), file number
   201206140019.
CR Alfieri L, 2015, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V19, P2247, DOI 10.5194/hess-19-2247-2015
   Barberis E, 1995, FERT RES, V45, P199, DOI 10.1007/BF00748590
   BARTLETT MS, 1947, BIOMETRICS, V3, P39, DOI 10.2307/3001536
   Barton K., 2015, MuMIn: Multi-model inference
   BOERS PCM, 1988, WATER RES, V22, P355, DOI 10.1016/S0043-1354(88)90240-0
   Burnham K. P., 2002, Model selection and inference: a practical informationtheoretic approach, VSecond edition
   CARACO NF, 1989, NATURE, V341, P316, DOI 10.1038/341316a0
   Conley DJ, 2009, SCIENCE, V323, P1014, DOI 10.1126/science.1167755
   Cusell C, 2013, J APPL ECOL, V50, P998, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12096
   Einsele W., 1938, ARCHIV F R HYDROBIOL, V33, P361
   Emsens WJ, 2015, ECOL ENG, V77, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.01.029
   Geurts JJM, 2008, FRESHWATER BIOL, V53, P2101, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02038.x
   Geurts JJM, 2011, ECOL ENG, V37, P1620, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.06.038
   Gunnars A, 1997, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V37, P203, DOI 10.1023/A:1005744610602
   Hooda PS, 2000, J ENVIRON QUAL, V29, P1166, DOI 10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900040018x
   Houba J, 1989, Part 5 Soil Analysis Procedures
   JENSEN HS, 1992, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V235, P731, DOI 10.1007/BF00026261
   Lamers LPM, 2006, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V565, P165, DOI 10.1007/s10750-005-1912-8
   Lamers LPM, 2015, BIOL REV, V90, P182, DOI 10.1111/brv.12102
   Lamers LPM, 1998, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V32, P199, DOI 10.1021/es970362f
   Lamers LPM, 2002, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V478, P107, DOI 10.1023/A:1021022529475
   Lamers LPM, 2001, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V55, P87, DOI 10.1023/A:1010629319168
   Liikanen A, 2002, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V59, P269, DOI 10.1023/A:1016015526712
   Loeb R, 2007, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V85, P289, DOI 10.1007/s10533-007-9135-x
   Loeb R, 2008, ENVIRON POLLUT, V156, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.02.006
   McLatchey GP, 1998, J ENVIRON QUAL, V27, P1268, DOI 10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700050036x
   MOORE PA, 1994, J ENVIRON QUAL, V23, P955, DOI 10.2134/jeq1994.00472425002300050016x
   Mortimer CH, 1941, J ECOL, V29, P280, DOI 10.2307/2256395
   OLSEN STERLING R., 1954, U S DEPT AGRIC CIRC, V939, P1
   Pant HK, 2003, WATER RES, V37, P965, DOI 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00474-8
   PATRICK WH, 1974, SCIENCE, V186, P53, DOI 10.1126/science.186.4158.53
   Ponnamperuma F. N., 1984, Flooding and plant growth, P9
   Pretty JN, 2003, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V37, P201, DOI 10.1021/es020793k
   RICHARDSON CJ, 1985, SCIENCE, V228, P1424, DOI 10.1126/science.228.4706.1424
   Roy JW, 2014, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V48, P1492, DOI 10.1021/es404801y
   Smolders AJP, 2006, CHEM ECOL, V22, P93, DOI 10.1080/02757540600579730
   Smolders AJP, 2008, RESTOR ECOL, V16, P240, DOI 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00267.x
   Smolders AJP, 2010, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V98, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10533-009-9387-8
   SPERBER JI, 1958, NATURE, V181, P934, DOI 10.1038/181934a0
   Van Dijk J, 2004, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V71, P317, DOI 10.1007/s10533-004-0079-0
   van Kempen MML, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0050159
   Wong PP, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P361
   Zak D, 2007, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V85, P141, DOI 10.1007/s10533-007-9122-2
   Zak D, 2006, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V80, P109, DOI 10.1007/s10533-006-0003-x
NR 44
TC 14
Z9 14
U1 1
U2 57
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0925-8574
EI 1872-6992
J9 ECOL ENG
JI Ecol. Eng.
PD SEP
PY 2016
VL 94
BP 1
EP 6
DI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.05.046
PG 6
WC Ecology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Engineering
GA DT7AI
UT WOS:000381636400001
OA Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Marshall, NA
   Stokes, CJ
   Webb, NP
   Marshall, PA
   Lankester, AJ
AF Marshall, N. A.
   Stokes, C. J.
   Webb, N. P.
   Marshall, P. A.
   Lankester, A. J.
TI Social vulnerability to climate change in primary producers: A typology
   approach
SO AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Social resilience; Adaptive capacity; Resource dependency; Climate
   sensitivity; Barriers to change; Climate impacts
ID ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; RESOURCE DEPENDENCY; VARIABILITY; ADAPTATION;
   RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; AGRICULTURE; RANGELANDS; IMPACTS
AB Adaptation of agricultural industries to climate change will make a major difference to the extent of the impacts experienced as a result of climate change. Vulnerability assessments provide the basis for developing strategies to reduce social vulnerability and plan for climate adaptation. Primary industries have been identified as the most vulnerable industry sector globally. We review how primary producers might be socially vulnerable to climate change and develop a 'vulnerability typology' of cattle producers based on survey responses from 240 producers across northern Australia. We measured social vulnerability according to ten indicators of climate sensitivity (resource dependency) and four indicators of adaptive capacity. Using a K-means clustering analysis we identified four main types' of cattle producers. Type 1 producers (43%) were vulnerable because they had low strategic skills and low interest in changing behaviour. Mean age was 59 years old, they were weakly networked within the industry and businesses were small. Type II producers (41%) had low strategic skills, poorly managed risk and uncertainty, had medium sized businesses and were 51 years old on average. Only 16% of producers (Type III and IV) appeared to have resilience to change. Type III producers (13.4%) had a stronger psychological and financial buffer, were 52 years old on average, were well networked and managed or owned larger businesses. Type IV producers (2.6%) managed risk well, liked to experiment with options and were interested in change. They were 41 years old on average, managed extremely large properties, were well networked, perceived themselves as responsible for the future productivity of their land and were early adopters of new technology. By providing knowledge of the different ways in which people can be vulnerable to climate change, vulnerability assessments can enable decision-makers to prioritise their efforts, provide a basis for early engagement, and tailor a range of adaptation approaches to most effectively accommodate and support the divergent requirements of different "types" of resource-users. Crown Copyright (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Marshall, N. A.] James Cook Univ, CSIRO Ecosyst Sci & Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.
   [Stokes, C. J.; Lankester, A. J.] James Cook Univ, CSIRO Ecosyst Sci, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.
   [Webb, N. P.] USDA ARS Jornada Expt Range, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA.
   [Marshall, P. A.] Great Barrier Reef Marine Pk Author, Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia.
C3 James Cook University; Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research
   Organisation (CSIRO); Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research
   Organisation (CSIRO); James Cook University; United States Department of
   Agriculture (USDA)
RP Marshall, NA (corresponding author), James Cook Univ, CSIRO Ecosyst Sci & Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Univ Dr, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.
EM nadine.marshall@csiro.au
RI Marshall, Nadine/D-9339-2011; Lankester, Ally/B-3215-2013; Marshall,
   Paul/E-7262-2012; Webb, Nicholas/D-3337-2011; Stokes, Chris/G-5199-2010
OI Webb, Nicholas/0000-0001-9355-5512; Stokes, Chris/0000-0003-1576-2457;
   marshall, nadine/0000-0003-4463-3558
FU CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship; Department of Agriculture, Forests
   and Fisheries, Canberra; ARS [ARS-0423561, 813350] Funding Source:
   Federal RePORTER
FX The authors are sincerely grateful to the 240 cattle producers who
   agreed to participate in the study. We are indebted to Kate Nairn, Jamie
   Atwell, Svetlana Ukolova, Arun George, Charlie Morgan and Regina
   Andreassen for their terrific interviewing. Many thanks to Ryan
   McAllister and Roger Lawes for constructively criticizing the manuscript
   in an early draft. We would like to gratefully acknowledge the support
   of the CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship and the Department of
   Agriculture, Forests and Fisheries, Canberra.
CR Adger W. N., 2003, Progress in Development Studies, V3, P179, DOI 10.1191/1464993403ps060oa
   Adger WN, 2010, NEW POLIT ECON, V15, P275, DOI 10.1080/13563460903290912
   Allison HE, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Andersen E, 2007, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V82, P353, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.04.021
   Andersson H, 2005, AMBIO, V34, P383, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2005)034[0383:FCTIS]2.0.CO;2
   Armitage D, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.07.002
   Bailey C, 1996, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V9, P191, DOI 10.1080/08941929609380964
   Bohnet I, 2008, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V88, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.07.002
   Cabrera VE, 2006, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V113, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.039
   Clark W. C., 2005, ENVIRONMENT, V47, P2
   Cobon DH, 2009, RANGELAND J, V31, P31, DOI 10.1071/RJ08069
   Cooper PJM, 2008, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V126, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.007
   Darnhofer I, 2010, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V30, P545, DOI 10.1051/agro/2009053
   Emtage N., 2006, Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, V13, P79
   Endfield GH, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P3676, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1114831109
   Fankhauser S, 1999, ECOL ECON, V30, P67, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00117-7
   Füssel HM, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.05.002
   GOKLANY IM, 1995, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V30, P427, DOI 10.1007/BF01093855
   González JJ, 2001, SOCIOL RURALIS, V41, P343, DOI 10.1111/1467-9523.00187
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Gustafson P, 2001, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V21, P5, DOI 10.1006/jevp.2000.0185
   Hansen JW, 2002, AGR SYST, V74, P305, DOI 10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00042-2
   Hobbs NT, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P776, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.011
   Howden SM, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P19691, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701890104
   Ingram JSI, 2008, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V126, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.009
   Jones JW, 2000, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V82, P169, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00225-5
   Joseph C, 2008, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V88, P594, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.028
   Källström HN, 2005, AMBIO, V34, P376, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2005)034[0376:SSACL]2.0.CO;2
   Krannich Richard., 1997, RES COM SOC, V7, P201
   Lankester A, 2012, AUST GEOGR, V43, P233, DOI 10.1080/00049182.2012.706202
   Lawes R. A., 2012, AGR SYST, P106
   Lebel L, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Li XL, 2008, RANGELAND J, V30, P211, DOI 10.1071/RJ08011
   Marshall NA, 2012, ENVIRON RES LETT, V7, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034022
   Marshall NA, 2011, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V24, P1105, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2010.509856
   Marshall NA, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V107, P511, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9962-y
   Marshall NA, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.10.003
   Marshall N.A., 2010, SUSTAINING TROPICAL
   Marshall N. A., 2013, ECOSYSTEMS
   Marshall NA, 2013, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V66, P88, DOI 10.2111/REM-D-11-00176.1
   McAllister RRJ, 2008, RANGELAND J, V30, P167, DOI 10.1071/RJ07040
   McAllister RRJ, 2006, ECOL APPL, V16, P572, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0572:PRTVOR]2.0.CO;2
   McKeon GM, 2004, PASTURE DEGRADATION
   Moser SC, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P22026, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1007887107
   Nelson DR, 2007, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V32, P395, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
   O'Farrell PJ, 2009, S AFR J SCI, V105, P34, DOI 10.1590/s0038-23532009000100018
   Olsson P, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P9489, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0706905105
   Price L, 2009, J RURAL STUD, V25, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.03.008
   Risbey JS, 2013, INT J CLIMATOL, V33, P2459, DOI 10.1002/joc.3597
   Roos P. B., 2015, International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses, V7, P13
   Sivakumar MVK, 2005, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V70, P31, DOI 10.1007/s10584-005-5937-9
   Smit B, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008
   Smith DMS, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P20690, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0704837104
   Spector P. E., 1992, SUMMATD RATING SCALE
   Stedman RC, 1999, FOREST CHRON, V75, P765, DOI 10.5558/tfc75765-5
   Steneck RS, 2011, CONSERV BIOL, V25, P904, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01717.x
   Stokes C, 2010, ADAPTING AGRICULTURE TO CLIMATE CHANGE: PREPARING AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES FOR THE FUTURE, P1
   Stokes CJ, 2006, RANGELAND J, V28, P83, DOI 10.1071/RJ05026
   Taylor CR, 2003, AGR SYST, V75, P251, DOI 10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00068-9
   Thomas RJ, 2008, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V126, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.011
   Tschakert P, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.008
   Valbuena D, 2008, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V128, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.04.015
   Verchot LV, 2008, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V126, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.010
   Volney WJA, 2000, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V82, P283, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00232-2
   Walker S, 2005, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V70, P311, DOI 10.1007/s10584-005-5952-x
   Watson I.W., 2004, GLOBAL ENV IN PRESS
   White B, 2000, ATMOS OCEAN SCI LIB, V21, P1
   Wreford A, 2010, INT J AGR SUSTAIN, V8, P278, DOI 10.3763/ijas.2010.0482
NR 68
TC 66
Z9 78
U1 1
U2 103
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0167-8809
EI 1873-2305
J9 AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON
JI Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
PD MAR 15
PY 2014
VL 186
BP 86
EP 93
DI 10.1016/j.agee.2014.01.004
PG 8
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary; Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Agriculture; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA AH1HL
UT WOS:000335871000009
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Xia, CL
   Zhang, ZY
   Liu, CQ
   Zhang, HX
   Tian, S
AF Xia, Chunlan
   Zhang, Zhiyong
   Liu, Chengqing
   Zhang, Huaxin
   Tian, Shuai
TI Study on Numerical Model and Dynamic Response of Ring Net in Flexible
   Rockfall Barriers
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE sustainable development goals; flexible rockfall barriers; ring net;
   energy dissipation; bending deformation; tensile deformation
ID TESTS
AB Developing reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructure of high quality and improving the ability of countries to resist and adapt to climate-related disasters and natural disasters have been endorsed by the Inter-Agency Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goals (IAEG-SDGs) as key indicators for monitoring SDGs. Landslides pose a serious threat to vehicle traffic and infrastructure in mountain areas all over the world, so it is urgent and necessary to prevent and control them. However, the traditional rigid protective structure is not conducive to the long-term prevention and control of landslide disasters because of its poor impact resistance, high material consumption and difficult maintenance in the later period. Therefore, this study is aimed at the flexible rockfall barriers with good corrosion resistance, material saving and strong cushioning performance, and proposes a fine numerical model of a ring net. This model is used to simulate the existing experiments, and the simulation results are in good agreement with the experimental data. In addition, the numerical model is also used to study the influence of boundary conditions, rockfall gravity and rockfall impact angle on the energy consumption of the ring net. It is indicated that the fixed constraint of four corners increases the deformability, flexibility and energy dissipation ability of the ring net. Apart from that, the influence of gravity on the energy dissipation of the overall protective structure should not be neglected during the numerical simulation analysis when the diameter of rockfall is large enough. As the impact angle rises, the impact energy of the rockfall on the ring net will experience a gradual decline, and the ring at the lower support ropes will be broken. When the numerical model proposed in this study is used to simulate the dynamic response of flexible rockfall barriers, it can increase the accuracy of data and make the research results more credible. Meanwhile, flexible rockfall barriers are the most popular infrastructure for landslide prevention and control at present, which improves the ability of countries to resist natural disasters to some extent. Therefore, the research results provide technical support for the better development and application of flexible rockfall barriers in landslide disasters prevention and control, and also provide an important and optional reference for evaluating sustainable development goals (SDGs) globally and regionally according to specific application goals.
C1 [Xia, Chunlan; Zhang, Zhiyong] Sichuan Water Conservancy Vocat Coll, Dept Hydraul Engn, Chongzhou 611230, Peoples R China.
   [Xia, Chunlan; Zhang, Zhiyong] Protect Struct Inst Sichuan Water Conservancy Inn, Chongzhou 611230, Peoples R China.
   [Xia, Chunlan; Liu, Chengqing; Zhang, Huaxin; Tian, Shuai] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China.
C3 Southwest Jiaotong University
RP Liu, CQ (corresponding author), Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China.
EM lanlan_8776@163.com; lwcivil@163.com; lcqjd@swjtu.edu.cn;
   z1346594651@163.com; XclSL211@163.com
RI LIU, CHENGQING/J-7730-2019
OI LIU, CHENGQING/0000-0001-9916-4627
FU Key Projects of Sichuan Education Department of China [18ZA0413];
   National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778538]; China
   Scholarship Council [201707005100]; China-Indonesia Joint Research
   Center for High-speed Railway Technology [KY201801005]
FX The financial support from the Key Projects of Sichuan Education
   Department of China (No. 18ZA0413), the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (No. 51778538) and the China Scholarship Council
   (No. 201707005100), and the China-Indonesia Joint Research Center for
   High-speed Railway Technology (No. KY201801005) are acknowledged and
   sincerely appreciated by the authors. This research received no external
   funding.
CR Boulaud R, 2022, ENG STRUCT, V251, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113512
   Boulaud R, 2020, INT J SOLIDS STRUCT, V200, P297, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.01.008
   Coulibaly JB, 2019, ROCK MECH ROCK ENG, V52, P4475, DOI 10.1007/s00603-019-01878-6
   Douthe C, 2022, GEOSCIENCES, V12, DOI 10.3390/geosciences12020075
   Froude MJ, 2018, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V18, P2161, DOI 10.5194/nhess-18-2161-2018
   Grassl H, 2002, STRUCT MAT, V11, P143
   Grassl H.G., 2002, THESIS ETH ZURICH ZU
   Hungr O, 2001, ENVIRON ENG GEOSCI, V7, P221, DOI 10.2113/gseegeosci.7.3.221
   Jiang RC, 2021, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V48, DOI 10.1029/2021GL093723
   Kwan JSH, 2019, CAN GEOTECH J, V56, P1225, DOI 10.1139/cgj-2017-0628
   Liu C., 2015, Xinan Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/J. Southwest Jiaotong Univ, V50, P110, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.01.016, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.0258-2724.2015.01.016]
   Liu CQ, 2021, STRUCTURES, V30, P647, DOI 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.12.089
   Liu CQ, 2017, STRUCT DES TALL SPEC, V26, DOI 10.1002/tal.1372
   Qin JQ, 2020, MEASUREMENT, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107409
   Volkwein A., 2004, NUMERISCHE SIMULATIO
   Wang M., 2011, THESIS LOGISTICAL EN
   [汪敏 Wang Min], 2012, [振动与冲击, Journal of Vibration and Shock], V31, P55
   Wendeler C, 2008, WIT TRANS ENG SCI, V60, P23
   Wendeler C, 2015, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V15, P2597, DOI 10.5194/nhess-15-2597-2015
   Wendeler C., 2014, THESIS ETH ZURICH ZU
   Yang JJ, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V99, P71, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03709-x
   Zhu ZH, 2019, COMPUT GEOTECH, V116, DOI 10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103208
NR 22
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 2
U2 37
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD APR
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 8
AR 4406
DI 10.3390/su14084406
PG 17
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 0R0BQ
UT WOS:000785272600001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Xie, HL
   Eames, M
   Mylona, A
   Challenor, P
   De Grussa, Z
   Davies, H
AF Xie, Hailun
   Eames, Matt
   Mylona, Anastasia
   Challenor, Peter
   De Grussa, Zoe
   Davies, Hywel
TI Evaluating UKCP18-Based weather files for overheating assessment using
   building simulation: A case study for a flat in london
SO BUILDING SERVICES ENGINEERING RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Overheating; weather file; morphing; climate change
AB Global warming and net zero transition are the two biggest challenges currently faced by the building industry in the UK. While the net zero transition primarily focuses on the problems of energy efficiency and heat decarbonization, the rise of global temperature imposes a significant threat to the health and wellbeing of occupants and the industry is obliged to make buildings climate-resilient by testing their designs using future weather files. To improve the quality of the current weather files, a new project has been commissioned by CIBSE to revisit the data and the methodology employed for creating future weather files and produce new CIBSE weather files using the latest UK Climate Projections released in 2018 (UKCP18). In this study, we evaluate the newly produced weather files for overheating risk using building simulation. Two different batches of weather files were curated. The first batch was produced primarily using the existing methodology for creating the UKCP09 based weather files, with an adjustment to accommodate new features of the UKCP18 and an improved procedure for morphing the solar radiation data. The second batch was created through an improved morphing process to better emulate the characteristics of distributions of climatic variables. The differences between the existing UKCP09 and new UCKP18 based weather files are compared by evaluating overheating metrics. The new weather files enable robust building performance assessment against future climate conditions under different scenarios and will play an important role in designing climate-resilient buildings and delivering a net zero built environment.Practical applications As the extreme weather events resulting from climate change become more frequent and intense, they pose significant challenges to the resilience of the built environment and severe threats to the health and wellbeing of the occupants. Climate data, which serves as the foundation for climate risk assessment, plays a critical role in helping the building sector to achieve climate resilience through the means of performance assessment and the channel of regulatory compliance. In this study, the revised future weather files created using the latest UKCP18 climate projections are presented and evaluated using building simulation, as part of the weather file testing programme for quality assurance. The revision of the CIBSE weather files according to the latest climate science, i.e. UKCP18, will enable the building industry to quantify overheating risks with more accurate climate assumptions and better inform decision making about risk mitigation and climate adaptation.
C1 [Xie, Hailun; Mylona, Anastasia; De Grussa, Zoe; Davies, Hywel] Chartered Inst Bldg Serv Engineers, London, England.
   [Xie, Hailun; Eames, Matt] Univ Exeter, Fac Environm Sci & Econ, Dept Engn, Harrison Bldg,North Pk Rd, Exeter EX4 4QF, England.
   [Challenor, Peter] Univ Exeter, Fac Environm Sci & Econ, Dept Math & Stat, Exeter, England.
C3 University of Exeter; University of Exeter
RP Xie, HL (corresponding author), Chartered Inst Bldg Serv Engineers, London, England.
EM H.X.Xie@exeter.ac.uk
RI Challenor, Peter/M-2579-2016
FU Innovate UK through the Knowledge Transfer Partnerships (KTPs) programme
   [12939]
FX The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for
   the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work
   is funded by the Innovate UK through the Knowledge Transfer Partnerships
   (KTPs) programme, grant no. 12939.
CR [Anonymous], 2017, Design Methodology for the Assessment of Overheating Risk in Homes
   Eames M, 2011, BUILD SERV ENG RES T, V32, P127, DOI 10.1177/0143624410379934
   Eames M., 2016, CIBSE-Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers
   Eames ME, 2024, BUILD SERV ENG RES T, V45, P5, DOI 10.1177/01436244231218861
   Johns DT., 2021, Within a broader context of climate modelling uncertainty
   Lowe JA., 2018, Met Office
   Met Office, 2018, UKCP18 Guidance: Representative Concentration Pathways
   Murphy JM., 2018, Met Office
   Slingo J., 2021, The third UK Climate Change Risk Assessment Technical Report
   Xie HL, 2024, APPL ENERG, V357, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122549
NR 10
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0143-6244
EI 1477-0849
J9 BUILD SERV ENG RES T
JI Build Serv. Eng. Res. Technol.
PD 2024 OCT 13
PY 2024
DI 10.1177/01436244241291203
EA OCT 2024
PG 11
WC Construction & Building Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology
GA J0J2H
UT WOS:001334014600001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Raimi, MO
   Odubo, TV
   Alima, O
   Efegbere, HA
   Ebuete, AW
AF Raimi, Morufu Olalekan
   Odubo, Tonye Vivien
   Alima, Ogah
   Efegbere, Henry Akpojubaro
   Ebuete, Abinotami Williams
TI Articulating the Effect of Pesticides Use and Sustainable Develop-ment
   Goals (SDGs): The Science of Improving Lives through Deci-sion Impacts
SO RESEARCH ON WORLD AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY
LA English
DT Article
DE Human ingenuity; Decision impacts; Sustainable Development Goals;
   Planetary health; Pesticides; Dialogue and cooperation; Outreach
   programs; Nigeria
AB Nothing vast comes into a mortal's life without a curse. Identifying the pathways of pesticide impact can be multifaceted as well as complex, as humankind faces the magnificent challenge of food systems reconfiguration toward providing and delivering healthy foods that individuals can access while protecting planetary health. Ideally, chemical pesticides used inappropriately in agricultural activities has shaped serious health as well as environmental problems in the global south. The United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) as well as World Health Organization (WHO) approximate that the rates of pesticide poisoning occur 2-3 times per minute, having roughly 20,000 employees dying yearly from exposure, mostly in emerging countries. From an environmental point of view, "chemically-polluted runoff" comes through fields that pollute both ground as well as surface waters, destroying freshwater ecosystems, damaged fisheries, as well as creating growing and sustainable "dead zones" in the coastal areas near the river's mouths of the drain agricultural areas. The environmental as well as health hazards resulting from pesticides could remain comparatively avoided through education as the first step towards achieving the SDGs as well as creating sustainable incentives toward curbing the overuse trend. Other important challenges need to be resolved, for example social inclusion; poverty reduction; education, increased equity as well as health care; sustainable energy; conservation of biodiversity; water security; and changing climate adaptation as well as mitigation. These challenges are interlinked as well as embodied in 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which all UN member states have accepted since 2015 as well as built round the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Therefore, managing the rapid accelerators considerately will need negotiation as well as collaboration from a wide range of civil society sector, private as well as public actors. The time has come toward putting the challenge of sociotechnical innovation as well as massive human ingenuity toward usage to safeguard the next generations as well as the planet future. While, the world is not on the pathway toward realizing its global goals come 2030. Prior to the outbreak of COVID-19, uneven progress had been witnessed, as well as more focused considerations was required in many areas. The sudden onset of the pandemic abruptly hampered the SDGs implementation and, in other cases, twisted decades of progress backwards.
C1 [Raimi, Morufu Olalekan] Niger Delta Univ, Fac Clin Sci, Dept Community Med, Environm Hlth Unit, Wilberforce Isl, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.
   [Odubo, Tonye Vivien; Ebuete, Abinotami Williams] Niger Delta Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Management, Amassoma, Nigeria.
   [Alima, Ogah] Teesside Univ, Sch Hlth & Life Sci, Middlesbrough, England.
   [Efegbere, Henry Akpojubaro] Edo Univ, Dept Community Med, Iyamho, Edo State, Nigeria.
C3 University of Teesside
RP Raimi, MO (corresponding author), Niger Delta Univ, Fac Clin Sci, Dept Community Med, Environm Hlth Unit, Wilberforce Isl, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.
EM ola07038053786@gmail.com
CR Adedoyin OO, 2020, MOJ Public Health, V9, P81, DOI [10.15406/mojph.2020.09.00328, DOI 10.15406/MOJPH.2020.09.00328]
   Adeolu A.T., 2018, J SCI RES REP, V19, P1, DOI [10.9734/JSRR/2018/43133, DOI 10.9734/JSRR/2018/43133]
   [Anonymous], 2011, World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision
   [Anonymous], 2010, World Urbanization Prospects: The 2009 Revision
   [Anonymous], 2014, WORLD URBANIZATION P, DOI [10.4054/DemRes.2005.12.9, DOI 10.4054/DEMRES.2005.12.9, 10.4054/demres.2005.12.9]
   [Anonymous], 2006, State of the world's cities 2006/2007-The Millennium Development Goals and urban sustainability: 30 years of shaping the habitat agenda
   [Anonymous], 2003, CHALL SLUMS GLOB REP
   [Anonymous], 2009, World Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision
   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2018, Future of food and agriculture 2018: alternative pathways to 2050
   Gift R A, 2020, Open Access J Sci, V4, P34, DOI [DOI 10.15406/OAJS.2020.04.00148, 10.15406/oajs.2020.04.00148]
   Gift RA, 2020, Open Access Journal of Science, V4, P69, DOI DOI 10.15406/OAJS.2020.04.00155
   International Monetary Fund, 2023, World Economic Outlook: A Rocky Recovery
   Isah H. M., 2020, Journal of Education and Learning Management (JELM), HolyKnight, V1, P31, DOI [10.46410/jelm.2020.1.1.05, DOI 10.46410/JELM.2020.1.1.05]
   Monsurat Suleiman Romoke, 2019, International Research Journal of Applied Sciences
   Muhammad Isah Hussain, 2020, Merit Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, V8, P432, DOI DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.4008682
   Ochayi, 2018, MOJ PUBLIC HLTH, V7, P337, DOI DOI 10.15406/MOJPH.2018.07.00265
   Odipe O. E., 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal, V3, P186, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3422457, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3422457]
   Olalekan R. M, 2020, Merit Research Journal of Environmental Science and Toxicology, V6, P031, DOI DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.3779288
   Olalekan R. M, 2020, ES Journal of Public Health, V1, P1002
   Olalekan R.M., 2019, MOJ ECOL ENV SCI, V4, P114, DOI DOI 10.15406/MOJES.2019.04.00142
   Olalekan Raimi Morufu, 2020, Medical and Research Microbiology, V1
   Olalekan Raimi Morufu, 2020, EC Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, V4
   Olalekan Raimi Morufu, 2018, WORLD C GLOB WARM VA
   Olalekan Raimi Morufu, 2019, 6 GLOB SUMM EXP POLL
   Olalekan Raimi Morufu, 2020, Journal of Agriculture
   Olalekan Raimi Morufu, 2020, CPQ Medicine, V11, P01
   Olalekan RM, 2020, Open Access Journal of Science, V4, P82, DOI DOI 10.15406/OAJS.2020.04.00156
   Olalekan RM, 2020, Research and Advances: Environmental Sciences, V2020, P72, DOI DOI 10.33513/RAES/2001-13
   Omidiji A. O, 2019, ASS ENV IMP ASS NIG
   Raimi M., 2019, ECOLOGY CONSERVATION, V1, DOI DOI 10.19080/ECOA.2019.01.555558
   Raimi M. O, 2017, Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR), V3
   Raimi M. O, 2019, Journal of Scientific Research in Allied Sciences, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.26838/JUSRES.2019.5.4.104
   Raimi M.O., 2019, Int J Hydro, P244, DOI DOI 10.15406/IJH.2019.03.00187
   Raimi M. O, 2019, Public Health Open Access, V3, DOI DOI 10.23880/PHOA-16000134
   Raimi M. O., 2020, ARTS HUMANITIES OPEN, V4, P191, DOI DOI 10.15406/AHOAJ.2020.04.00170
   Raimi M.O., 2021, SCH SUSTAIN ENV, V6, DOI DOI 10.22158/SE.V6N1P61
   Raimi M. O, 2019, ASS ENV IMP ASS NIG, DOI DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.35999.51366
   Raimi Morufu Olalekan, 2021, Communication, Society and Media
   Raimi Morufu Olalekan, 2021, Annals of Community Medicine & Public Health, V1, P1002
   Samson T.K., 2020, European Journal of Applied Sciences, V8, P1, DOI DOI 10.14738/AIVP.84.8705
   Sawyerr O.H., 2018, MOJ ECO ENV SCI, V3, P369, DOI DOI 10.15406/MOJES.2018.03.00115
NR 41
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 1
U2 1
PU Nan Yang Acad Sciences - NASS
PI Singapore
PA 12 Eu Tong Sen Street, #07-169, Singapore, SINGAPORE
SN 2737-4777
EI 2737-4785
J9 RES WORLD AGR ECON
JI Res. World Agric. Econ.
PD MAR
PY 2021
VL 2
IS 1
BP 29
EP 36
DI 10.36956/rwae.v2i1.347
PG 8
WC Agricultural Economics & Policy
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Agriculture
GA K5W4Y
UT WOS:001344575000005
OA hybrid, Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Tanveer, H
   Ishtiaq, M
   Mehrban, A
   Waheeda, M
   Shahzad, A
   Mehwish, M
AF Tanveer, H.
   Ishtiaq, M.
   Mehrban, A.
   Waheeda, M.
   Shahzad, A.
   Mehwish, M.
TI ASSESSMENT OF WHEAT FOLIAR MYCOFLORA AND ITS MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN
   DISTRICT BHIMBER, AZAD KASHMIR, PAKISTAN
SO APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE mycoflora; wheat varieties; foliar diseases; fungicides; biocontrol
ID FUSARIUM; CLIMATE; BLIGHT; SPOT
AB In this research, an analysis of wheat foliar mycoflora was explored with detection of 21 foliar fungal species from eight cultivated varieties in the wheat fields of District Bhimber of Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. Out of 21 species, 19 were isolated from three wheat varieties viz: V1 (Fareed-2006), V3 (Lasani-2008) and V6 (Aas 2011). Wheat variety V8 (Galaxy-2013) showed less number (28.5%) of fungal species invasion. Mycosphaerella graminicola was present ubiquitously on all eight wheat varieties with 100% prevalence while Cephalosporium gramineum was only found on three wheat varieties with 37.5%. The minimum occurrence was shown by fungus Nigrospora sphaerica (15%). In sub-division Samahni, wheat variety Fareed-2006 (V1) depicted the highest disease susceptibility with incidence of 63.3%. The variety Galaxy-2013 was found the best crop in Samahni having least incidence value of 22.3%. In sub-division Bhimber, wheat variety Seher-2006 was the most affected by mycoflora having highest disease incidence (60.0%) while least infection was measured in Galaxy-2013 (20.9%), being appropriate varietal crop for the area. In Barnala sub-division, Fareed-2006 indicated highest disease incidence (59.7%) while minimum disease incidence was measured in Galaxy-2013 (29.7%). As general conclusion Galaxy-2013 was proved as the best crop variety in the study area being nonth or least infected by fungal taxa. In second aspect of experiment comprising of optimization of management and control strategies, the parameter of grain yield was measured. As a general without any pre-treatment of seed crop, the variety V8 was the best of with yield of 1543 kg/ha, that might be due to its genetic resistance or better eco-climatic adaptability. Out of applied management strategies; use of fungicides (Quadris and Headline) spray on wheat leaves proved to be better having rise of yield i.e., 1550 kg/ha and 1560 kg/ha, respectively. The other strategy: use of biological products i.e. different plant extracts (Acacia nilotica, Azadirachta indica, Curcuma longa, Eucaylptus citriodora, Ficus bengalensis) spray proved that landmark rise was obtained in yield from variety V8 with 1739 kg/ha as compared to others. This rise was huge (1739 kg/ha) in comparison to the without treatment crop having 1543 kg/ha yield and it was proved pre-treatment produces better crop than control (blank) sample culminating the result that use of bio-products (plant extracts) are the best for control and management of mycoflora of wheat.
C1 [Tanveer, H.; Ishtiaq, M.; Waheeda, M.; Shahzad, A.; Mehwish, M.] Mirpur Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Bot, Bhimber Campus, Bhimber Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.
   [Mehrban, A.] Univ Gujarat, Dept Chem, Gujrat City, Pakistan.
RP Tanveer, H (corresponding author), Mirpur Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Bot, Bhimber Campus, Bhimber Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.
EM tanveerajk@gmail.com; drishtiaqajk@gmail.com
RI Ishtiaq, Prof. Dr. Muhammad/F-5152-2010; Ashiq, Mehrban/O-1225-2013
OI Ishtiaq, Prof. D.r Muhammad/0000-0003-2468-1413; Ashiq,
   Mehrban/0000-0003-1131-4841
CR [Anonymous], 2001, FOOD NUTR BULL
   [Anonymous], QUARTERLY, DOI DOI 10.2307/23044045
   [Anonymous], 1982, Compendium of Soil Fungi, DOI DOI 10.2307/1220704
   [Anonymous], ACT C TOD TRIG 18 19
   [Anonymous], 2012, FAOSTAT
   [Anonymous], J RES
   Aqil F, 2010, COMBATING FUNGAL INFECTIONS: PROBLEMS AND REMEDY, P449, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-12173-9_19
   Arregui M.C., 2008, MECANISMOS MODO ACCI, V208
   Bender J, 2011, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V31, P81, DOI 10.1051/agro/2010013
   Benkeblia N, 2004, LEBENSM-WISS TECHNOL, V37, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.lwt.2003.09.001
   Bockus W. W., 2010, COMPENDIUM WHEAT DIS, VThird
   Carignano M, 2008, AGRON J, V100, P145, DOI 10.2134/agronj2007.0092
   Carmona M., 1999, 14 INT PLANT PROT C
   Chakraborty S, 2011, EUPHYTICA, V179, P19, DOI 10.1007/s10681-010-0324-7
   Champeil A, 2004, PLANT SCI, V166, P1389, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.02.004
   Chaurasia P.C.P., 2006, NEPAL AGR RES J, V7, P63
   Dubin H. J., 1994, Studies of soilborne diseases and foliar blights of wheat at the national wheat research experiment station, Bhairahawa
   Dumalasova Veronika, 2009, Plant Protection Science, V45, pS38
   Ewert F, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P153, DOI 10.1038/nclimate1426
   Fazal M.J.R, 2005, PAKIKISTAN J BOT, P829
   Fernandes JM, 2004, P 2 INT S FUS HEAD B, P441
   GILAMAN JC, 1945, MANUAL SOIL FUNGI
   Hussain T, 2011, PAK J BOT, V43, P2581
   Iftikhar S, 2012, PAK J BOT, V44, P361
   Jaczewska K.A., 2010, SWIAT ZBO, V14, P16
   Juroszek P, 2011, PLANT PATHOL, V60, P100, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02410.x
   Korbas M., 2004, Progress in Plant Protection, V44, P147
   Madgwick JW, 2011, EUR J PLANT PATHOL, V130, P117, DOI 10.1007/s10658-010-9739-1
   Neha Pathak Neha Pathak, 2013, Annals of Biological Research, V4, P1
   Oerke EC, 2006, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V144, P31, DOI 10.1017/S0021859605005708
   Ortiz R, 2008, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V126, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.019
   Pettitt T. R., 1996, P20
   Rosada J., 2010, Progress in Plant Protection, V50, P1181
   ROTH GW, 1987, AGRON J, V79, P197, DOI 10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900020005x
   Sharan R, 2003, PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2004, P140
   Sharma RC, 2004, FIELD CROP RES, V89, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.02.002
   SINGH RV, 1998, HELMINTHOSPORIUM BLI, P346
   Svecnjak Z, 2005, J AGRON CROP SCI, V191, P130, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2004.00133.x
   Teng P. S., 2001, Plant pathologist's pocketbook, P25, DOI 10.1079/9780851994581.0025
   USMANI SMH, 1982, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V14, P203, DOI 10.1016/0038-0717(82)90024-4
   Wagacha JM, 2007, CROP PROT, V26, P877, DOI 10.1016/j.cropro.2006.09.003
   West JS, 2012, FUNGAL ECOL, V5, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.funeco.2011.03.003
   Wolf A, 1998, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V284, P817
NR 43
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 2
PU CORVINUS UNIV BUDAPEST
PI BUDAPEST
PA VILLANYI UT 29/43, BUDAPEST, H-1118, HUNGARY
SN 1589-1623
EI 1785-0037
J9 APPL ECOL ENV RES
JI Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res.
PY 2016
VL 14
IS 5
BP 49
EP 65
DI 10.15666/aeer/1405_049065
PG 17
WC Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA ER1DH
UT WOS:000398529200004
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Merwin, JT
   Seeholzer, GF
   Smith, BT
AF Merwin, Jon T.
   Seeholzer, Glenn F.
   Smith, Brian Tilston
TI Macroevolutionary bursts and constraints generate a rainbow in a clade
   of tropical birds
SO BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Macroevolution; Bird; Color; Phylogeny; Model adequacy; Lorikeet; Mosaic
   evolution
ID ANCESTRAL CHARACTER STATES; PLUMAGE COLORATION; MOSAIC EVOLUTION; R
   PACKAGE; PARROTS; LIMITATIONS; LIKELIHOOD; FEATHERS; MODELS;
   DIVERSIFICATION
AB Background Bird plumage exhibits a diversity of colors that serve functional roles ranging from signaling to camouflage and thermoregulation. However, birds must maintain a balance between evolving colorful signals to attract mates, minimizing conspicuousness to predators, and optimizing adaptation to climate conditions. Examining plumage color macroevolution provides a framework for understanding this dynamic interplay over phylogenetic scales. Plumage evolution due to a single overarching process, such as selection, may generate the same macroevolutionary pattern of color variation across all body regions. In contrast, independent processes may partition plumage and produce region-specific patterns. To test these alternative scenarios, we collected color data from museum specimens of an ornate clade of birds, the Australasian lorikeets, using visible-light and UV-light photography, and comparative methods. We predicted that the diversification of homologous feather regions, i.e., patches, known to be involved in sexual signaling (e.g., face) would be less constrained than patches on the back and wings, where new color states may come at the cost of crypsis. Because environmental adaptation may drive evolution towards or away from color states, we tested whether climate more strongly covaried with plumage regions under greater or weaker macroevolutionary constraint. Results We found that alternative macroevolutionary models and varying rates best describe color evolution, a pattern consistent with our prediction that different plumage regions evolved in response to independent processes. Modeling plumage regions independently, in functional groups, and all together showed that patches with similar macroevolutionary models clustered together into distinct regions (e.g., head, wing, belly), which suggests that plumage does not evolve as a single trait in this group. Wing patches, which were conserved on a macroevolutionary scale, covaried with climate more strongly than plumage regions (e.g., head), which diversified in a burst. Conclusions Overall, our results support the hypothesis that the extraordinary color diversity in the lorikeets was generated by a mosaic of evolutionary processes acting on plumage region subsets. Partitioning of plumage regions in different parts of the body provides a mechanism that allows birds to evolve bright colors for signaling and remain hidden from predators or adapt to local climatic conditions.
C1 [Merwin, Jon T.; Seeholzer, Glenn F.; Smith, Brian Tilston] Amer Museum Nat Hist, Dept Ornithol, Cent Pk West & 79th St, New York, NY 10024 USA.
   [Merwin, Jon T.] Columbia Univ, Dept Ecol Evolut & Environm Biol, New York, NY 10027 USA.
C3 American Museum of Natural History (AMNH); Columbia University
RP Merwin, JT (corresponding author), Amer Museum Nat Hist, Dept Ornithol, Cent Pk West & 79th St, New York, NY 10024 USA.; Merwin, JT (corresponding author), Columbia Univ, Dept Ecol Evolut & Environm Biol, New York, NY 10027 USA.
EM jmerwin@amnh.org
RI Seeholzer, Glenn/JVN-9253-2024
OI Merwin, Jon/0000-0002-7808-5820; Seeholzer, Glenn/0000-0003-1337-2084
CR Abolins-Abols M., 2018, ROLE DIFFERENTIAL GE
   Adams DC, 2018, SYST BIOL, V67, P14, DOI 10.1093/sysbio/syx055
   [Anonymous], 1933, MEASUREMENTS BIRDS
   [Anonymous], 2017, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
   [Anonymous], INT J CLIMATOLOGY
   Barton RA, 2000, NATURE, V405, P1055, DOI 10.1038/35016580
   BEASLEY BA, 1988, CAN J ZOOL, V66, P1352, DOI 10.1139/z88-198
   Bennett ATD, 1997, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V94, P8618, DOI 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8618
   Berg ML, 2010, EMU, V110, P10, DOI 10.1071/MU09076
   BirdLife International & NatureServe, 2011, BIRD SPEC DISTR MAPS
   Burtt EH, 2011, BIOL LETTERS, V7, P214, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0716
   Chira AM, 2016, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V29, P2502, DOI 10.1111/jeb.12979
   Cooke TF, 2017, CELL, V171, P427, DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.016
   Cunningham CW, 1998, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V13, P361, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01382-2
   Dale J, 2015, NATURE, V527, P367, DOI 10.1038/nature15509
   Delhey K, 2019, BIOL REV, V94, P1294, DOI 10.1111/brv.12503
   Delhey K, 2019, ECOL LETT, V22, P726, DOI 10.1111/ele.13233
   Dunn PO, 2015, SCI ADV, V1, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1400155
   Edler AU, 2010, PLUMAGE COLOURATION
   Ekman S, 2008, SYST BIOL, V57, P141, DOI 10.1080/10635150801910451
   Endler JA, 2018, BOUNDARY STRENGTH AN, DOI [10.1101/342063, DOI 10.1101/342063]
   Esteve-Altava B, 2017, BIOL REV, V92, P1332, DOI 10.1111/brv.12284
   Felice RN, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P555, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1716437115
   Forshaw Joseph, 2010, P15
   Gloger CL, 1833, NATURE, V124, P753
   Gluckman TL, 2010, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V23, P2501, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02109.x
   Goldberg EE, 2008, EVOLUTION, V62, P2727, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00505.x
   Gomez D, 2007, AM NAT, V169, pS42, DOI 10.1086/510138
   Goolsby EW, 2016, SYST BIOL, V65, P852, DOI 10.1093/sysbio/syw051
   Goswami A, 2016, EVOLUTION, V70, P1622, DOI 10.1111/evo.12956
   Harmon LJ, 2008, BIOINFORMATICS, V24, P129, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm538
   Heinsohn R, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P617, DOI 10.1126/science.1112774
   Hemingson CR, 2019, ECOL LETT, V22, P190, DOI 10.1111/ele.13180
   Hill GE, 2006, FUNCTION EVOLUTION
   HILL RW, 1980, PHYSIOL ZOOL, V53, P305, DOI 10.1086/physzool.53.3.30155793
   Hofmann CM, 2006, EVOLUTION, V60, P1680, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00512.x
   Irestedt M, 2009, BMC EVOL BIOL, V9, DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-9-235
   Kane SA, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0210924
   Losos JB, 1999, ANIM BEHAV, V58, P1319, DOI 10.1006/anbe.1999.1261
   Maia Rafael, 2013, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, V4, P906
   Masello JF, 2004, ECOL RES, V19, P421, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1703.2004.00653.x
   Masello JF, 2003, EMU, V103, P149, DOI 10.1071/MU02036
   Mckay BD, 2013, BIOL J LINN SOC, V110, P1, DOI 10.1111/bij.12086
   Medina I, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-05898-8
   Miller ET, 2018, 375261 BIORXIV, DOI [10.1101/375261, DOI 10.1101/375261]
   Montgomerie R, 2001, BEHAV ECOL, V12, P429, DOI 10.1093/beheco/12.4.429
   Morrison ES, 2018, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V31, P764, DOI 10.1111/jeb.13257
   Morrison ES, 2016, INTEGR COMP BIOL, V56, P235, DOI 10.1093/icb/icw026
   Nemesio Andre, 2001, International Journal of Ornithology, V4, P75
   Nordén KK, 2018, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V33, P574, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2018.05.003
   Omland KE, 2000, EVOLUTION, V54, P2119
   Orme D., 2018, CAPER PACKAGE COMP A
   Ornelas JF, 2009, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V22, P471, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01679.x
   Pennell MW, 2015, AM NAT, V186, pE33, DOI 10.1086/682022
   Powell BJ, 2012, BRAIN BEHAV EVOLUT, V80, P170, DOI 10.1159/000341161
   Provost KL, 2018, EMU, V118, P7, DOI 10.1080/01584197.2017.1387030
   Revell LJ, 2012, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V3, P217, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x
   Saranathan V, 2007, MOL ECOL, V16, P3689, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03415.x
   Schluter D, 2000, AM NAT, V156, pS4, DOI 10.1086/303412
   Schweizer M, 2015, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V90, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.04.021
   Schweizer M, 2014, ECOL EVOL, V4, P2867, DOI 10.1002/ece3.1131
   Schwochow-Thalmann D., 2018, Molecular identification of colour pattern genes in birds
   Seeholzer GF, 2017, EVOLUTION, V71, P702, DOI 10.1111/evo.13177
   SERPELL J, 1989, BIOL J LINN SOC, V36, P193, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1989.tb00490.x
   Skinner A, 2010, BIOL LETTERS, V6, P354, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0840
   Smith BT, 2019, UNEVEN MISSING DATA
   Smith SA, 2012, BIOINFORMATICS, V28, P2689, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts492
   Soma M, 2018, BEHAV ECOL, V29, P676, DOI 10.1093/beheco/ary021
   Stevens M, 2013, BEHAV ECOL, V24, P213, DOI 10.1093/beheco/ars156
   Stoddard MC, 2008, AM NAT, V171, P755, DOI 10.1086/587526
   Survey USG U.S. Geological Survey, 2003, SHUTTL RAD TOP MISS, DOI [10.3133/fs07103, DOI 10.3133/FS07103]
   Taiyun Wei VS, 2013, CORRPLOT VISUALIZATI
   Troscianko J, 2015, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V6, P1320, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12439
   Yu GC, 2017, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V8, P28, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12628
   Zink R.M., 1986, Current Ornithology, V4, P1
NR 75
TC 17
Z9 22
U1 2
U2 30
PU BMC
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND
SN 1471-2148
J9 BMC EVOL BIOL
JI BMC Evol. Biol.
PD FEB 24
PY 2020
VL 20
IS 1
AR 32
DI 10.1186/s12862-020-1577-y
PG 19
WC Evolutionary Biology; Genetics & Heredity
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Evolutionary Biology; Genetics & Heredity
GA KV4HQ
UT WOS:000520443700001
PM 32093609
OA Green Submitted, gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Auffret, AG
   Vangansbeke, P
   De Frenne, P
   Auestad, I
   Basto, S
   Grandin, U
   Jacquemyn, H
   Jakobsson, A
   Kalamees, R
   Koch, MA
   Marrs, R
   Marteinsdottir, B
   Wagner, M
   Bekker, RM
   Bruun, HH
   Decocq, G
   Hermy, M
   Jankowska-Blaszczuk, M
   Milberg, P
   Maren, IE
   Pakeman, RJ
   Phoenix, GK
   Thompson, K
   Van Calster, H
   Vandvik, V
   Plue, J
AF Auffret, Alistair G.
   Vangansbeke, Pieter
   De Frenne, Pieter
   Auestad, Inger
   Basto, Sofia
   Grandin, Ulf
   Jacquemyn, Hans
   Jakobsson, Anna
   Kalamees, Rein
   Koch, Marcus A.
   Marrs, Rob
   Marteinsdottir, Bryndis
   Wagner, Markus
   Bekker, Renee M.
   Bruun, Hans Henrik
   Decocq, Guillaume
   Hermy, Martin
   Jankowska-Blaszczuk, Malgorzata
   Milberg, Per
   Maren, Inger E.
   Pakeman, Robin J.
   Phoenix, Gareth K.
   Thompson, Ken
   Van Calster, Hans
   Vandvik, Vigdis
   Plue, Jan
TI More warm-adapted species in soil seed banks than in herb layer plant
   communities across Europe
SO JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; climatic debt; dispersal; plants; seed longevity;
   seedbank; thermophilisation
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; TRAITS; SHIFTS; RESPONSES; REGENERATION; TEMPERATURES;
   MECHANISMS; VEGETATION; DIVERSITY; DYNAMICS
AB Responses to climate change have often been found to lag behind the rate of warming that has occurred. In addition to dispersal limitation potentially restricting spread at leading range margins, the persistence of species in new and unsuitable conditions is thought to be responsible for apparent time-lags. Soil seed banks can allow plant communities to temporarily buffer unsuitable environmental conditions, but their potential to slow responses to long-term climate change is largely unknown. As local forest cover can also buffer the effects of a warming climate, it is important to understand how seed banks might interact with land cover to mediate community responses to climate change. We first related species-level seed bank persistence and distribution-derived climatic niches for 840 plant species. We then used a database of plant community data from grasslands, forests and intermediate successional habitats from across Europe to investigate relationships between seed banks and their corresponding herb layers in 2763 plots in the context of climate and land cover. We found that species from warmer climates and with broader distributions are more likely to have a higher seed bank persistence, resulting in seed banks that are composed of species with warmer and broader climatic distributions than their corresponding herb layers. This was consistent across our climatic extent, with larger differences (seed banks from even warmer climates relative to vegetation) found in grasslands. Synthesis. Seed banks have been shown to buffer plant communities through periods of environmental variability, and in a period of climate change might be expected to contain species reflecting past, cooler conditions. Here, we show that persistent seed banks often contain species with relatively warm climatic niches and those with wide climatic ranges. Although these patterns may not be primarily driven by species' climatic adaptations, the prominence of such species in seed banks might still facilitate climate-driven community shifts. Additionally, seed banks may be related to ongoing trends regarding the spread of widespread generalist species into natural habitats, while cool-associated species may be at risk from both short- and long-term climatic variability and change.
C1 [Auffret, Alistair G.] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Ecol, Uppsala, Sweden.
   [Vangansbeke, Pieter; De Frenne, Pieter] Univ Ghent, Fac Biosci Engn, Dept Environm, Forest & Nat Lab, Ghent, Belgium.
   [Auestad, Inger] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Dept Environm Sci, Sogndal, Norway.
   [Basto, Sofia] Pontificia Univ Javeriana, Fac Ciencias, Dept Biol, Un Ecol & Sistemat, Bogota, Colombia.
   [Grandin, Ulf] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Aquat Sci & Assessment, Uppsala, Sweden.
   [Jacquemyn, Hans] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Biol Dept, Plant Conservat & Populat Biol, Heverlee, Belgium.
   [Jakobsson, Anna] Univ West, Div Educ Sci & Languages, Trollhattan, Sweden.
   [Kalamees, Rein] Univ Tartu, Inst Ecol & Earth Sci, Tartu, Estonia.
   [Kalamees, Rein] Tallinn Bot Garden, Tallinn, Estonia.
   [Koch, Marcus A.] Heidelberg Univ, Ctr Organismal Studies COS Heidelberg, Dept Biodivers & Plant Systemat, Heidelberg, Germany.
   [Marrs, Rob] Univ Liverpool, Sch Environm Sci, Liverpool, England.
   [Marteinsdottir, Bryndis] Soil Conservat Serv Iceland, Hella, Iceland.
   [Wagner, Markus] UK Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford, England.
   [Bekker, Renee M.] Univ Groningen, Groningen Inst Archaeol, Groningen, Netherlands.
   [Bruun, Hans Henrik] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Biol, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   [Decocq, Guillaume] Jules Verne Univ Picardie, Amiens, France.
   [Hermy, Martin] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Heverlee, Belgium.
   [Jankowska-Blaszczuk, Malgorzata] Jan Kochanowski Univ Kielce, Environm Biol Dept, Kielce, Poland.
   [Milberg, Per] Linkoping Univ, IFM Biol, Linkoping, Sweden.
   [Maren, Inger E.] Univ Bergen, Dept Biol Sci, Bergen, Norway.
   [Pakeman, Robin J.] James Hutton Inst, Aberdeen, Scotland.
   [Phoenix, Gareth K.; Thompson, Ken] Univ Sheffield, Sch Biosci, Sheffield, England.
   [Van Calster, Hans] Res Inst Nat & Forest, Brussels, Belgium.
   [Plue, Jan] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Swedish Biodivers Ctr, Uppsala, Sweden.
C3 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Ghent University; Western
   Norway University of Applied Sciences; Pontificia Universidad Javeriana;
   Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; KU Leuven; University West
   - Sweden; University of Tartu; Tartu University Institute of Ecology &
   Earth Sciences; Ruprecht Karls University Heidelberg; University of
   Liverpool; UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH); University of
   Groningen; University of Copenhagen; Universite de Picardie Jules Verne
   (UPJV); KU Leuven; Jan Kochanowski University; Linkoping University;
   University of Bergen; James Hutton Institute; University of Sheffield;
   Research Institute for Nature & Forest; Swedish University of
   Agricultural Sciences
RP Auffret, AG (corresponding author), Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Ecol, Uppsala, Sweden.
EM alistair.auffret@slu.se
RI Auffret, Alistair/AGB-4949-2022; Vangansbeke, Pieter/AAP-6762-2021;
   Jacquemyn, Hans/AAC-4875-2019; Milberg, Per/G-6153-2012; Hermy,
   Martin/A-3769-2009; Auestad, Inger/JCD-9278-2023; Basto,
   Sofía/AAF-8192-2019; Grandin, Ulf/HKO-5291-2023; Bruun, Hans
   Henrik/C-4476-2008; Plue, Jan/A-2058-2011; Måren, Inger/J-4870-2015;
   Vandvik, Vigdis/C-1924-2008; De Frenne, Pieter/N-4969-2014; Koch,
   Marcus/A-4924-2011
OI Jacquemyn, Hans/0000-0001-9600-5794; Van Calster,
   Hans/0000-0001-8595-8426; Grandin, Ulf/0000-0003-0320-0692; Auffret,
   Alistair/0000-0002-4190-4423; Basto, Sofia/0000-0003-3214-8133; Auestad,
   Inger/0000-0001-6321-0433; Vangansbeke, Pieter/0000-0002-6356-2858;
   Bruun, Hans Henrik/0000-0003-0674-2577; De Frenne,
   Pieter/0000-0002-8613-0943; Koch, Marcus/0000-0002-1693-6829
FU H2020 European Research Council [757833]; Svenska Forskningsradet Formas
   [2015-1065, 2018-00961]; Vetenskapsradet [2020-04276]; Formas
   [2018-00961] Funding Source: Formas; Swedish Research Council
   [2020-04276] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
FX H2020 European Research Council, Grant/Award Number: 757833; Svenska
   Forskningsradet Formas, Grant/Award Number: 2015-1065 and 2018-00961;
   Vetenskapsradet, Grant/Award Number: 2020-04276
CR Alexander JM, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P563, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13976
   Ash JD, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P1305, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13429
   Auffret AG, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P4303, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14765
   Auffret AG, 2017, FUNCT ECOL, V31, P436, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12716
   Barriopedro D, 2011, SCIENCE, V332, P220, DOI 10.1126/science.1201224
   Basto S, 2018, NPJ CLIM ATMOS SCI, V1, DOI 10.1038/s41612-017-0007-3
   Becker-Scarpitta A, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P1629, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14568
   Bertrand R, 2011, NATURE, V479, P517, DOI 10.1038/nature10548
   Borcard D, 2002, ECOL MODEL, V153, P51, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00501-4
   Breheny P, 2017, R J, V9, P56, DOI 10.32614/RJ-2017-046
   Chen IC, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P1024, DOI 10.1126/science.1206432
   Childs DZ, 2010, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V277, P3055, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.0707
   Chytry M, 2008, ECOLOGY, V89, P1541, DOI 10.1890/07-0682.1
   De Frenne P, 2019, NAT ECOL EVOL, V3, P744, DOI 10.1038/s41559-019-0842-1
   De Frenne P, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P18561, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1311190110
   DeMalach N, 2021, J ECOL, V109, P1275, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13555
   Devictor V, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P121, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1347
   Eriksson O, 1996, OIKOS, V77, P248, DOI 10.2307/3546063
   Eskelinen A, 2021, ECOLOGY, V102, DOI 10.1002/ecy.3512
   European Environment Agency, 2022, GLOB EUR TEMP
   Fadrique B, 2018, NATURE, V564, P207, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0715-9
   Fick SE, 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P4302, DOI 10.1002/joc.5086
   Gasperini C, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V798, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149373
   Gioria M, 2021, ECOL LETT, V24, P1655, DOI 10.1111/ele.13783
   Gioria M, 2020, J ECOL, V108, P2121, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13437
   González-Varo JP, 2021, NATURE, V595, P75, DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-03665-2
   Herben T, 2018, FUNCT ECOL, V32, P799, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13011
   Hodkinson DJ, 1998, FUNCT ECOL, V12, P762, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00256.x
   Karger DN, 2017, SCI DATA, V4, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2017.122
   Karlik P, 2014, ACTA OECOL, V58, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.actao.2014.03.003
   Keith SA, 2009, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V276, P3539, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2009.0938
   Kelly AE, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P11823, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0802891105
   Kleyer M, 2008, J ECOL, V96, P1266, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01430.x
   Larson JE, 2016, J ECOL, V104, P1284, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12613
   Leishman MR, 2001, OIKOS, V93, P294, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.930212.x
   Lenoir J, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P1470, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12129
   Lindström Å, 2013, ECOGRAPHY, V36, P313, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07799.x
   Loydi A, 2021, J VEG SCI, V32, DOI 10.1111/jvs.13089
   Martin-Murphy BV, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI [10.1371/journal.pone.0080949, 10.1371/journal.pone.0103352, 10.1371/journal.pone.0109166]
   Moles AT, 2003, J BIOGEOGR, V30, P105, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00781.x
   Morecroft MD, 1998, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V90, P141, DOI 10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00070-1
   Nielsen TF, 2019, ECOL LETT, V22, P1650, DOI 10.1111/ele.13361
   Ooi MKJ, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P2375, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01887.x
   Pakeman RJ, 2008, J ECOL, V96, P355, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01336.x
   Pakeman RJ, 2013, J VEG SCI, V24, P865, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01484.x
   Parmesan C, 2003, NATURE, V421, P37, DOI 10.1038/nature01286
   Pierce S, 2017, FUNCT ECOL, V31, P444, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12722
   Plue J, 2008, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V23, P673, DOI 10.1007/s10980-008-9229-4
   Plue J, 2021, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V30, P128, DOI 10.1111/geb.13201
   R Core Team, 2022, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
   Schielzeth H, 2010, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V1, P103, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00012.x
   Snyder RE, 2006, ECOL LETT, V9, P1106, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00962.x
   Spinoni J, 2015, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V127, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.01.012
   Staude IR, 2022, ECOL LETT, V25, P466, DOI 10.1111/ele.13937
   Staude IR, 2020, NAT ECOL EVOL, V4, P802, DOI 10.1038/s41559-020-1176-8
   Suggitt AJ, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P713, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0231-9
   Thompson K, 1998, J ECOL, V86, P163, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00240.x
   Thompson K., 1997, The soil seed banks of North West Europe
   Vandvik V, 2006, AM NAT, V168, P157, DOI 10.1086/505759
   Vangansbeke P., 2021, FIGSHARE, DOI [10.6084/m9.figshare.12199628.v2, DOI 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.12199628.V2]
   Vangansbeke P, 2021, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V30, P1183, DOI 10.1111/geb.13303
   Vila M, 2007, J VEG SCI, V18, P35, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02513.x
   Walck JL, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2145, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02368.x
   Wiens JJ, 2016, PLOS BIOL, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001104
   Wolkovich EM, 2012, NATURE, V485, P494, DOI 10.1038/nature11014
   Zellweger F, 2020, SCIENCE, V368, P772, DOI 10.1126/science.aba6880
NR 66
TC 2
Z9 3
U1 10
U2 42
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0022-0477
EI 1365-2745
J9 J ECOL
JI J. Ecol.
PD MAY
PY 2023
VL 111
IS 5
BP 1009
EP 1020
DI 10.1111/1365-2745.14074
EA FEB 2023
PG 12
WC Plant Sciences; Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA E8XU9
UT WOS:000936062900001
OA Green Published, hybrid, Green Accepted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Silver, JM
   Arkema, KK
   Griffin, RM
   Lashley, B
   Lemay, M
   Maldonado, S
   Moultrie, SH
   Ruckelshaus, M
   Schill, S
   Thomas, A
   Wyatt, K
   Verutes, G
AF Silver, Jessica M.
   Arkema, Katie K.
   Griffin, Robert M.
   Lashley, Brett
   Lemay, Michele
   Maldonado, Sergio
   Moultrie, Stacey H.
   Ruckelshaus, Mary
   Schill, Steven
   Thomas, Adelle
   Wyatt, Katherine
   Verutes, Gregory
TI Advancing Coastal Risk Reduction Science and Implementation by
   Accounting for Climate, Ecosystems, and People
SO FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE coastal protection; coastal habitats; coastal hazards; ecosystem
   services; social vulnerability; sea level rise; The Bahamas; natural and
   nature-based features
ID NATURAL INFRASTRUCTURE; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; WATER-QUALITY;
   CORAL-REEFS; PROTECTION; ADAPTATION; LESSONS; HAZARD; RESILIENCE;
   MANAGEMENT
AB Climate change and population growth are degrading coastal ecosystems and increasing risks to communities and infrastructure. Reliance on seawalls and other types of hardened shorelines is unsustainable in an era of rising seas, given the costs to build and maintain these structures and their unintended consequences on ecosystems. This is especially true for communities that depend on coastal and marine ecosystems for livelihoods and sustenance. Protecting and restoring coral reefs and coastal forests can be lower cost, sustainable alternatives for shoreline protection. However, decision-makers often lack basic information about where and under what conditions ecosystems reduce risk to coastal hazards and who would benefit. To better understand where to prioritize ecosystems for coastal protection, we assessed risk reduction provided by coral reefs, mangroves, and seagrass along the entire coast of The Bahamas, under current and future climate scenarios. Modeled results show that the population most exposed to coastal hazards would more than double with future sea-level rise and more than triple if ecosystems were lost or degraded. We also found that ecosystem-based risk reduction differs across islands due to variation in a suite of ecological, physical, and social variables. On some populated islands, like Grand Bahama and Abaco, habitats provide protection to disproportionately large numbers of people compared to the rest of the country. Risk reduction provided by ecosystems is also evident for several sparsely populated, remote coastal communities, which in some cases, have large elderly populations. The results from our analyses were critical for engaging policy-makers in discussions about employing natural and nature-based features for coastal resilience. After hurricanes Joaquin and Matthew hit The Bahamas in 2016 and 2017, our assessment of coastal risk reduction and the multiple benefits provided by coastal ecosystems helped pave the way for an innovative loan from the Inter-American Development Bank to the Government of The Bahamas to invest in mangrove restoration for coastal resilience. This work serves as an example for other regions and investors aiming to use assessments of ecosystem services to inform financing of natural and nature-based approaches for coastal resilience and climate adaptation.
C1 [Silver, Jessica M.; Arkema, Katie K.; Griffin, Robert M.; Maldonado, Sergio; Ruckelshaus, Mary; Wyatt, Katherine; Verutes, Gregory] Stanford Univ, Stanford Woods Inst Environm, Nat Capital Project, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
   [Silver, Jessica M.; Arkema, Katie K.; Ruckelshaus, Mary; Wyatt, Katherine] Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.
   [Lashley, Brett] Off Prime Minister Bahamas, Nassau, Bahamas.
   [Lemay, Michele] Interamer Dev Bank, Washington, DC USA.
   [Moultrie, Stacey H.] SEV Consulting Grp, Nassau, Bahamas.
   [Schill, Steven] Nature Conservancy, Caribbean Program, Nassau, Bahamas.
   [Thomas, Adelle] Univ Bahamas, Dept Environm & Life Sci, Nassau, Bahamas.
   [Verutes, Gregory] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Fac Polit & Social Sci, Dept Appl Econ, Santiago De Compostela, Spain.
   [Griffin, Robert M.] Univ Massachusetts Dartmouth, Sch Marine Sci & Technol, New Bedford, MA USA.
   [Lashley, Brett] Kings Coll London, Kings Business Sch, London, England.
   [Maldonado, Sergio] Univ Southampton, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Southampton, Hants, England.
C3 Stanford University; University of Washington; University of Washington
   Seattle; Inter-American Development Bank; Universidade de Santiago de
   Compostela; University of Massachusetts System; University Massachusetts
   Dartmouth; University of London; King's College London; University of
   Southampton
RP Silver, JM; Arkema, KK (corresponding author), Stanford Univ, Stanford Woods Inst Environm, Nat Capital Project, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.; Silver, JM; Arkema, KK (corresponding author), Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.
EM jess.silver@stanford.edu; karkema@stanford.edu
OI Maldonado, Sergio/0000-0001-6072-122X; Griffin,
   Robert/0000-0002-6271-5613; Verutes, Gregory/0000-0002-7667-7902;
   ruckelshaus, mary/0000-0001-9492-2708; Schill, Steven
   R/0000-0002-9066-434X
FU Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Program at the Inter-American
   Development Bank [BH-T1040]
FX This work was funded by the Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Program
   at the Inter-American Development Bank (BH-T1040).
CR Adger WN, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1036, DOI 10.1126/science.1112122
   Alongi DM, 2008, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V76, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.08.024
   Andrefouet S., 2005, P 10 INT COR REEF S, P1732
   [Anonymous], 2015, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V30, P9
   [Anonymous], 2016, THE TRIBUNE
   [Anonymous], ECOLOGICAL GAP ANAL
   [Anonymous], 2012, National oceanic and atmospheric administration (NOAA) technical report OAR CPO-1, DOI DOI 10.C0M/BL0B/VIEW/-/17720396/DATA/1/-/14YF705Z/-/GL0BAL-SEA-LEVEL-RISE-SCENARI0S-F0R-THE-UNITED-STATES-NATI0NAL-CLIMATE-ASSESSMENT.PDF.ACCESSED
   [Anonymous], 2018, PROJ REP REPCON TOOL
   [Anonymous], 2010, GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION
   [Anonymous], 2018, MIAMI HERALD
   Anthoff D, 2010, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V15, P321, DOI 10.1007/s11027-010-9220-7
   Arkema K, 2017, BHT1040 INT DEV BANK
   Arkema KK, 2017, CONSERVATION FOR THE ANTHROPOCENE OCEAN: INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE IN SUPPORT OF NATURE AND PEOPLE, P333, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-805375-1.00016-7
   Arkema KK, 2017, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1399, P5, DOI 10.1111/nyas.13322
   Arkema KK, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P913, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1944
   Bahamas Department of Statistics, 2017, 2010 CENS POP HOUS 1
   Barbier EB, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P321, DOI 10.1126/science.1150349
   Barbier EB, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V11, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.010
   Beck MW, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-04568-z
   Boruff BJ, 2005, J COASTAL RES, V21, P932, DOI 10.2112/04-0172.1
   Boutwell JL, 2016, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V52, P1472, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12473
   Burgess Kevin, 2004, Journal of Coastal Conservation, V10, P65, DOI 10.1652/1400-0350(2004)010[0065:FPTFCE]2.0.CO;2
   Cabral P, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V23, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.04.002
   Caribbean Coastal Services LTD [CCS] and SEV Consulting Group, 2016, CONS SERV PREP NAT I
   Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency [CDEMA], 2016, BAH HURR MATTH RAP A
   Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency [CDEMA], 2016, RAP NEEDS ASS REP N
   Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency [CDEMA], 2016, RAP NEEDS ASS GRAND
   Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency [CDEMA], 2016, DRAFT RAP NEEDS ASS
   Cheong SM, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P787, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1854
   CIA World Factbook, 2017, CIA WORLD FACTBOOK
   CIESIN (Center for International Earth Science Information Network), 2013, URB RUR POP LAND AR
   Clark WC, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P4615, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0900231108
   Clark WC, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P4570, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1601266113
   Cooper JAG, 1998, J COASTAL RES, V14, P512
   Costanza R, 2008, AMBIO, V37, P241, DOI 10.1579/0044-7447(2008)37[241:TVOCWF]2.0.CO;2
   Cutter S.L., 2009, Final Report to Oxfam America, V5, P1
   Cutter SL, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P242, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
   Danielsen F, 2005, SCIENCE, V310, P643, DOI 10.1126/science.1118387
   Das S, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P7357, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0810440106
   Diakakis M, 2015, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V24, P132, DOI 10.1108/DPM-05-2014-0082
   Dundas SJ, 2017, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V85, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.04.008
   EM-DAT International Disaster Database, 2018, GLOB DAT NAT TECHN D
   Environmental Resources Management Inc [ERM], 2017, SUST NASS ACT PLAN H
   ESRI, 2012, OC BAS 1 577K OC BAS
   Ferrario F, 2014, NAT COMMUN, V5, DOI 10.1038/ncomms4794
   Ghosal RD, 2016, J CRIT THOUGHT PRAXI, V5, P2
   Gittman RK, 2015, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V13, P301, DOI 10.1890/150065
   Gornitz V.M., 1990, J COASTAL RES, VSI 9, P201, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10661-017-6282-Y
   Guannel G, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0158094
   Hallegatte S, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P802, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1979, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1979]
   Hammar-Klose E.S., 2001, Coastal vulnerability to sea-level rise: a preliminary database for the US Atlantic, Pacific, and Gulf of Mexico coasts
   Henderson V, 2011, AM ECON REV, V101, P194, DOI 10.1257/aer.101.3.194
   Hillen M.M., 2010, Coastal Defence Cost Estimates. Case Study of the Netherlands
   Hincks J, 2017, HERE ARE DISTURBING
   Hinkel J, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3292, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1222469111
   Hopper T, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0163495
   Jones HP, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P504, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1463
   Jonkman SN, 2009, RISK ANAL, V29, P676, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01190.x
   Kishore N, 2018, NEW ENGL J MED, V379, P162, DOI [10.1056/nejmsa1803972, 10.1056/NEJMsa1803972]
   Knowles J. E., 2017, Expanding The Bahamas marine protected area network to protect 20% of the marine and coastal environment by 2020: a gap analysis
   Koch EW, 2009, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V7, P29, DOI 10.1890/080126
   Koks EE, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V47, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.013
   Kron W, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V66, P1363, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0215-4
   Landry CE, 2011, SOUTH ECON J, V77, P991, DOI 10.4284/0038-4038-77.4.991
   LANDWEHR JM, 1976, J WATER POLLUT CON F, V48, P954
   Langridge SM, 2014, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V95, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.03.019
   Lemay M, 2017, Project Profile (BH-L1043)
   Marine Spatial Ecology Lab [MSEL], 2005, COR REEF I ELL ESR A
   McGranahan G, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P17, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076960
   Moultrie S., 2016, ALLERGY
   Mycoo M., 2017, A blue urban agenda: Adapting to climate change in the coastal cities of Caribbean and Pacific Small Island Developing States
   Mycoo MA, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P1065, DOI 10.1007/s10113-016-1050-z
   Nansen Initiative, 2015, DIS IND CROSS BORD D, V1
   Narayan S, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0154735
   NASA LP DAAC, 2014, SHUTTL RAD TOP MISS
   National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA], 2011, NIGHTT LIGHTS ANN CO
   Neumann B, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0118571
   Nicholls R.J., 2008, OECD ENV WORKING PAP, DOI [DOI 10.1787/011766488208, 10.1787/011766488208]
   NOAA, 2018, Costliest U.S. tropical cyclones tables updated
   Nurse LA, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1613
   Office of the Prime Minister The Bahamas (OPM), 2017, SUST DEV MAST PLAN A
   Ott W.R., 1978, ENV INDICES THEORY P
   Pacific Disaster Center [PDC], 2016, HURR MATTH PREL DAM
   Panditharante M, 2018, NY TIMES
   Pasch R. J., 2019, AL152017 NAT HURR CT
   Peacock W.G., 2012, LESSONS HURRICANE IK, P66
   Rangel-Buitrago N, 2018, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V156, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.04.006
   Reguero BG, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0192132
   Reguero BG, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V210, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.024
   Reguero BG, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0133409
   Resio DT, 2008, PHYS TODAY, V61, P33, DOI 10.1063/1.2982120
   Revesz R, 2017, IRMA HURRICANE SUCKS
   Rhiney K, 2015, GEOGR COMPASS, V9, P97, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12199
   Rodríguez-Díaz CE, 2018, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V108, P30, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304198
   Roelvink J. A, 2010, XBEACH MODEL DESCRIP, P106
   Rolle A, 1990, STORM SURGE ATLAS NO, P22
   Ruckelshaus M, 2015, ECOL ECON, V115, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009
   Ruckelshaus MH, 2016, COAST MANAGE, V44, P504, DOI 10.1080/08920753.2016.1208882
   Scyphers SB, 2015, CONSERV LETT, V8, P41, DOI 10.1111/conl.12114
   Sharp R., 2016, INVEST VERSION USERS
   Shepard CC, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0027374
   Shultz JM, 2019, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V13, P5, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2018.28
   Shultz James M, 2016, Disaster Health, V3, P32, DOI 10.1080/21665044.2016.1173443
   Spalding MD, 2014, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V90, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.09.007
   Swamee PK, 2000, J ENVIRON ENG-ASCE, V126, P451, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2000)126:5(451)
   Temmerman S, 2013, NATURE, V504, P79, DOI 10.1038/nature12859
   Thatcher CA, 2013, J COASTAL RES, P234, DOI [10.2112/SI63-017.1, 10.2112/S163-017.1]
   The Nature Conservancy [TNC] and The National Coral Reef Institute [NCRI], 2010, ANDR ISL BENTH HAB S
   The Nature Conservancy [TNC] and The University of South Florida, 2007, BAH SEAGR LANDS 7 CL
   Thomas A, 2018, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V10, P86, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2017-0055
   Tolman H.L., 2009, NOAA/NWS/NCEP/MMAB Technical note, 276
   UNDRR, 2019, Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction (GAR)
   UNISDR, 2016, DESINVENTAR DIS INF
   United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean [UNECLAC], 2014, EFF CAMB CLIM COST A
   Wamsley TV, 2015, J COASTAL RES, V31, P1521, DOI 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-14-00015.1
   Wong PP, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P361
   World Resources Institute [WRI], 2004, BATH DEV WRI DEPTH P
   Zhang KQ, 2012, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V102, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2012.02.021
NR 118
TC 51
Z9 54
U1 2
U2 63
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-7745
J9 FRONT MAR SCI
JI Front. Mar. Sci.
PD SEP 24
PY 2019
VL 6
AR 556
DI 10.3389/fmars.2019.00556
PG 19
WC Environmental Sciences; Marine & Freshwater Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Marine & Freshwater Biology
GA JA8SI
UT WOS:000488121200001
OA gold, Green Accepted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wang, F
   Hessel, R
   Mu, XM
   Maroulis, J
   Zhao, GJ
   Geissen, V
   Ritsema, C
AF Wang, Fei
   Hessel, Rudi
   Mu, Xingmin
   Maroulis, Jerry
   Zhao, Guangju
   Geissen, Violette
   Ritsema, Coen
TI Distinguishing the impacts of human activities and climate variability
   on runoff and sediment load change based on paired periods with similar
   weather conditions: A case in the Yan River, China
SO JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Precipitation; Reference evapotranspiration (ETO); Surface runoff; Human
   activity; Climate variability; Similar weather condition (SWC)
ID LOESS PLATEAU; YELLOW-RIVER; MIDDLE REACHES; SOIL-EROSION; BASIN;
   STREAMFLOW; TRENDS; VEGETATION; CATCHMENT; WATER
AB Runoff and sediment loads from river basin are largely affected by the interplay of climate variability and human activities within the basin. However, distinguishing the impacts of climate variability and human activities would vastly improve our knowledge of water resources, climate variability and climate adaptation, and watershed management. We propose a new and simple method to determine the impact of human activities within paired datasets under the same or similar weather conditions (SWC). These weather conditions cover one or more meteorological elements such as precipitation, temperature, or evaporation. If there are two or more periods with similar weather conditions but different runoff, the relative runoff and sediment load changes can be considered a consequence of human-induced land surface changes. This study will report on the application of this new method, using the Yan River Basin in China as a case study. We found 10 sets PPs (paired periods) in 1 year intervals and 12 sets of PPs in intervals of 3 years when (1) there was a 2.0% and 1.0% difference of annual precipitation and annual ETO, respectively, (2) the relationship between monthly precipitation and ETO of PPs was significant (P < 0.05) and, (3) there was no overlap of years for the PPs with intervals of 1 and 3 years. We found that the impact of human activities varied greatly between PPs, with the main trend of declining PPs, matched the trends evident from statistical analysis and land use and land cover (LULC) change evaluation. The method is simple and easily applicable to selected periods in most areas and could be extended when more detailed data are available. The result of this method is the impact of all human activities, allowing for further discussion on the contributions of each kind of human activity over time in determining the range which links the research results at different scales, e.g. to define the sediment delivery ratio (SDR) describing soil erosion on catchment slopes and sediment load in the river. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Wang, Fei; Mu, Xingmin; Zhao, Guangju] Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Fei; Mu, Xingmin; Zhao, Guangju] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Fei; Mu, Xingmin; Zhao, Guangju] Minist Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
   [Hessel, Rudi; Geissen, Violette; Ritsema, Coen] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Alterra, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands.
   [Wang, Fei; Maroulis, Jerry; Geissen, Violette; Ritsema, Coen] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Soil Phys & Land Management Grp, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands.
   [Maroulis, Jerry] Univ So Queensland, Australian Ctr Sustainable Catchments, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
C3 Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Soil & Water Conservation
   (ISWC), CAS; Northwest A&F University - China; Chinese Academy of
   Sciences; Institute of Soil & Water Conservation (ISWC), CAS; Ministry
   of Water Resources; Wageningen University & Research; Wageningen
   University & Research; University of Southern Queensland
RP Wang, F (corresponding author), Xinong Rd 26, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi Provinc, Peoples R China.
EM wafe@ms.iswc.ac.cn
RI Maroulis, Jerry/H-8799-2019; Geissen, Violette/B-6153-2014; /J-8497-2013
OI Zhao, Guangju/0000-0002-4233-9403; Hessel, Rudi/0000-0002-1859-309X;
   /0000-0002-5213-4399; Zhao, Guangju/0000-0001-7756-4494
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41171420, 41271295]; Key
   Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZZD-EW-04];
   External Cooperation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [GJHZ1018];
   Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [OND1339291]; Chinese
   Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [QN2011150];
   EC-DG RTD, 6th Framework Research Programme [1.1.6.3]; Research on
   Desertification, project DESIRE [037046]
FX The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China [41171420 and 41271295], the Key Research Program of the Chinese
   Academy of Sciences [KZZD-EW-04], External Cooperation Program of
   Chinese Academy of Sciences [GJHZ1018]; Netherlands Organization for
   Scientific Research [OND1339291] and the Chinese Fundamental Research
   Funds for the Central Universities [QN2011150]. It also was conducted
   within the framework of the EC-DG RTD, 6th Framework Research Programme
   (sub-priority 1.1.6.3), Research on Desertification, project DESIRE
   (037046): Desertification Mitigation and Remediation of Land - a global
   approach for local solutions. The authors wish to thank Ms. Demie Moore
   for improving the manuscript.
CR Ahn KH, 2014, J HYDROL, V515, P257, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.062
   Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
   Arnell NW, 1999, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V9, pS31, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(99)00017-5
   Cannon AJ, 2002, INT J CLIMATOL, V22, P1687, DOI 10.1002/joc.811
   [陈少勇 CHEN Shaoyong], 2008, [中国沙漠, Journal of Desert Research], V28, P66
   Dinpashoh Y, 2011, J HYDROL, V399, P422, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.021
   FERRO V, 1995, HYDROLOG SCI J, V40, P703, DOI 10.1080/02626669509491460
   FU B, 1994, LAND DEGRAD REHABIL, V5, P33, DOI 10.1002/ldr.3400050105
   Fu G, 2007, HYDROL PROCESS, V21, P3431, DOI 10.1002/hyp.6574
   Gao P, 2011, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V15, P1, DOI 10.5194/hess-15-1-2011
   Gates JB, 2011, HYDROGEOL J, V19, P865, DOI 10.1007/s10040-011-0716-3
   HASTENRATH S, 1990, J CLIMATE, V3, P1080, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1990)003<1080:DAPOAR>2.0.CO;2
   Hessel R, 2003, CATENA, V54, P289, DOI 10.1016/S0341-8162(03)00070-5
   JAKEMAN AJ, 1993, WATER RESOUR RES, V29, P2637, DOI 10.1029/93WR00877
   Jhajharia D, 2014, INT J CLIMATOL, V34, P1369, DOI 10.1002/joc.3761
   Jhajharia D, 2012, HYDROL PROCESS, V26, P421, DOI 10.1002/hyp.8140
   Jiang SH, 2011, HYDROL PROCESS, V25, P2492, DOI 10.1002/hyp.8002
   Jiao J.Y., 2000, ACTA PHYTOECOLSIN, V24, P608
   LAL R, 1984, ADV AGRON, V37, P183, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60455-1
   Li LJ, 2007, HYDROL PROCESS, V21, P3485, DOI 10.1002/hyp.6485
   Liu J Y., 1996, Macro-scale survey and dynamic study of natural resources and environment of china by remote sensing
   Liu QA, 2011, ECOL MODEL, V222, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.11.022
   Marshall E, 2008, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V89, P263, DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9389-2
   McVicar TR, 2012, J HYDROL, V416, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.024
   Ministry of Water Resources of China, 2011, CHIN RIV SED B 2010
   Moraes JM, 1998, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V12, P295, DOI 10.1023/A:1008048212420
   Pan Q., 2005, YELLOW RIVER, V27, P13
   PIMENTEL D, 1987, BIOSCIENCE, V37, P277, DOI 10.2307/1310591
   Shangguan ZP, 2006, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V13, P307, DOI 10.1080/13504500609469682
   Taner MÜ, 2011, ECOL MODEL, V222, P3380, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.07.015
   Tang K., 2004, SOIL WATER CONSERVAT, P97
   van Dijk AIJM, 2002, J HYDROL, V261, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00020-3
   Van Steijn H, 2002, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V27, P1189, DOI 10.1002/esp.420
   WAKATSUKI T, 1992, GEODERMA, V52, P251, DOI 10.1016/0016-7061(92)90040-E
   Walling D.E., 1996, IAHS PUBL, V236, P77
   Wang D, 2010, ECOL COMPLEX, V7, P487, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.12.004
   Wang F., 2005, AGRIFOOD RES REPORTS, V68, P95
   Wang ZQ, 2009, J GEOGR SCI, V19, P707, DOI 10.1007/s11442-009-0707-7
   XU BCH, 2003, SCI SOIL WATER CONST, V1, P32
   Xu JH, 2011, INT J CLIMATOL, V31, P687, DOI 10.1002/joc.2110
   Xu JX, 2011, QUATERN INT, V244, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.09.014
   Xu JX, 2003, ENVIRON MANAGE, V31, P328, DOI 10.1007/s00267-002-2828-y
   Xu XZ, 2004, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V7, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2003.12.002
   Ye XC, 2013, J HYDROL, V494, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.036
   Zhang AJ, 2012, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V26, P2199, DOI 10.1007/s11269-012-0010-8
   Zhang SR, 2009, CATENA, V77, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2008.09.001
   Zhang YongFang Zhang YongFang, 2011, Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), V410, P239
   Zhao GJ, 2014, J HYDROL, V519, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.014
   Zhu TX, 1997, J HYDROL, V196, P99, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03310-0
NR 49
TC 51
Z9 54
U1 0
U2 105
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0022-1694
EI 1879-2707
J9 J HYDROL
JI J. Hydrol.
PD AUG
PY 2015
VL 527
BP 884
EP 893
DI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.037
PG 10
WC Engineering, Civil; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Geology; Water Resources
GA CN7QM
UT WOS:000358629100075
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Riedelsheimer, C
   Technow, F
   Melchinger, AE
AF Riedelsheimer, Christian
   Technow, Frank
   Melchinger, Albrecht E.
TI Comparison of whole-genome prediction models for traits with contrasting
   genetic architecture in a diversity panel of maize inbred lines
SO BMC GENOMICS
LA English
DT Article
DE Genomic selection; Whole-genome prediction; Genetic architecture;
   Complex traits; Zea mays
ID EAR ROT RESISTANCE; REGRESSION METHODS; COMPLEX TRAITS; LEAF-BLIGHT;
   SELECTION; REGULARIZATION; CONTAMINATION; LOCI; QTL
AB Background: There is increasing empirical evidence that whole-genome prediction (WGP) is a powerful tool for predicting line and hybrid performance in maize. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the sensitivity of WGP models towards the genetic architecture of the trait. Whereas previous studies exclusively focused on highly polygenic traits, important agronomic traits such as disease resistances, nutrifunctional or climate adaptational traits have a genetic architecture which is either much less complex or unknown. For such cases, information about model robustness and guidelines for model selection are lacking. Here, we compared five WGP models with different assumptions about the distribution of the underlying genetic effects. As contrasting model traits, we chose three highly polygenic agronomic traits and three metabolites each with a major QTL explaining 22 to 30% of the genetic variance in a panel of 289 diverse maize inbred lines genotyped with 56,110 SNPs.
   Results: We found the five WGP models to be remarkable robust towards trait architecture with the largest differences in prediction accuracies ranging between 0.05 and 0.14 for the same trait, most likely as the result of the high level of linkage disequilibrium prevailing in elite maize germplasm. Whereas RR-BLUP performed best for the agronomic traits, it was inferior to LASSO or elastic net for the three metabolites. We found the approach of genome partitioning of genetic variance, first applied in human genetics, as useful in guiding the breeder which model to choose, if prior knowledge of the trait architecture is lacking.
   Conclusions: Our results suggest that in diverse germplasm of elite maize inbred lines with a high level of LD, WGP models differ only slightly in their accuracies, irrespective of the number and effects of QTL found in previous linkage or association mapping studies. However, small gains in prediction accuracies can be achieved if the WGP model is selected according to the genetic architecture of the trait. If the trait architecture is unknown e. g. for novel traits which only recently received attention in breeding, we suggest to inspect the distribution of the genetic variance explained by each chromosome for guiding model selection in WGP.
C1 [Riedelsheimer, Christian; Technow, Frank; Melchinger, Albrecht E.] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Plant Breeding Seed Sci & Populat Genet, Stuttgart, Germany.
C3 University Hohenheim
RP Melchinger, AE (corresponding author), Univ Hohenheim, Inst Plant Breeding Seed Sci & Populat Genet, Stuttgart, Germany.
EM melchinger@uni-hohenheim.de
RI Technow, Frank/AAC-4994-2019
OI Technow, Frank/0000-0002-2497-3136; Melchinger, Albrecht
   E./0000-0002-8346-7786
FU German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [FKZ: 0315045,
   FKZ: 0315528D]
FX We thank the staff of the experimental stations of the University of
   Hohenheim for conducting the field experiments. We thank the groups of
   Mark Stitt and Lothar Willmitzer of the Max Planck Institute of
   Molecular Plant Physiology for performing the metabolic profiling. This
   research was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and
   Research (BMBF) within the project GABI-Energy (FKZ: 0315045) and the
   AgroClustEr 'Synbreed - Synergistic plant and animal breeding' (FKZ:
   0315528D).
CR Albrecht T, 2011, THEOR APPL GENET, V123, P339, DOI 10.1007/s00122-011-1587-7
   Bates D., 2012, Matrix: Sparse and Dense Matrix Classes and Methods. R package version 1.0-6
   Butler D.G., 2009, ASReml user guide release 3.0
   Clark SA, 2011, GENET SEL EVOL, V43, DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-43-18
   de los Campos G, 2009, GENETICS, V182, P375, DOI 10.1534/genetics.109.101501
   Duvick D. N., 2004, Plant Breeding Reviews, V24, P109
   Eyre-Walker A, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P4441, DOI 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4441
   FISCHER R.A., 1919, EARTH ENV SCI T R SO, V52, P399, DOI [10.1017/S0080456800012163, DOI 10.1017/S0080456800012163]
   Friedman J, 2010, J STAT SOFTW, V33, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v033.i01
   Ganal MW, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0028334
   Gianola D, 2008, GENETICS, V178, P2289, DOI 10.1534/genetics.107.084285
   Grieder C, 2012, THEOR APPL GENET, V124, P981, DOI 10.1007/s00122-011-1762-x
   Grieder C, 2011, J NEAR INFRARED SPEC, V19, P463, DOI 10.1255/jnirs.959
   Habier D, 2007, GENETICS, V177, P2389, DOI 10.1534/genetics.107.081190
   Hastie T., 2001, The Elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02985802
   Hayes BJ, 2009, J DAIRY SCI, V92, P433, DOI 10.3168/jds.2008-1646
   Hayes BJ, 2010, PLOS GENET, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001139
   Heffner EL, 2009, CROP SCI, V49, P1, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0512
   Heslot N, 2012, CROP SCI, V52, P146, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2011.06.0297
   Higham NJ, 2002, IMA J NUMER ANAL, V22, P329, DOI 10.1093/imanum/22.3.329
   Jannink JL, 2010, BRIEF FUNCT GENOMICS, V9, P166, DOI 10.1093/bfgp/elq001
   Li ZT, 2012, THEOR APPL GENET, V125, P419, DOI 10.1007/s00122-012-1892-9
   Lisec J, 2006, NAT PROTOC, V1, P387, DOI 10.1038/nprot.2006.59
   Martin M, 2012, CROP SCI, V52, P32, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2011.04.0214
   Martin M, 2011, CROP SCI, V51, P1935, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2010.11.0664
   Meuwissen THE, 2001, GENETICS, V157, P1819
   Morrell PL, 2012, NAT REV GENET, V13, P85, DOI 10.1038/nrg3097
   Ogutu Joseph O, 2012, BMC Proc, V6 Suppl 2, pS10, DOI 10.1186/1753-6561-6-S2-S10
   Piepho HP, 2009, CROP SCI, V49, P1165, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2008.10.0595
   Poland JA, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P6893, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1010894108
   Riedelsheimer C, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P8872, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1120813109
   Riedelsheimer C, 2012, NAT GENET, V44, P217, DOI 10.1038/ng.1033
   Ruppert David, 2003, Semiparametric regression
   Simic D, 2012, J HERED, V103, P47, DOI 10.1093/jhered/esr122
   Technow F, 2012, THEOR APPL GENET, V125, P1181, DOI 10.1007/s00122-012-1905-8
   Tibshirani R, 1996, J ROY STAT SOC B, V58, P267, DOI 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x
   Welz HG, 2000, PLANT BREEDING, V119, P1, DOI 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2000.00462.x
   Wisser RJ, 2006, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V96, P120, DOI 10.1094/PHYTO-96-0120
   Wong JC, 2004, THEOR APPL GENET, V108, P349, DOI 10.1007/s00122-003-1436-4
   Yan JB, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008451
   Yang Jian, 2011, Am J Hum Genet, V88, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011
   Yang J, 2011, NAT GENET, V43, P519, DOI 10.1038/ng.823
   Yang WZ, 2012, GENETICS, V190, P1491, DOI 10.1534/genetics.111.131540
   Zhao YS, 2012, THEOR APPL GENET, V124, P769, DOI 10.1007/s00122-011-1745-y
   Zou H, 2005, J R STAT SOC B, V67, P301, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x
NR 45
TC 69
Z9 81
U1 0
U2 34
PU BMC
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND
SN 1471-2164
J9 BMC GENOMICS
JI BMC Genomics
PD SEP 4
PY 2012
VL 13
AR 452
DI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-452
PG 9
WC Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Genetics & Heredity
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Genetics & Heredity
GA 085WB
UT WOS:000314643900002
PM 22947126
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT B
AU Teller, C
AF Teller, Charles
BE Teller, C
   Hailemariam, A
TI Are there Mixed Malthusian and Boserupian Consequences of Population
   Pressure and Food Insecurity? Vulnerability and Demographic Responses in
   16 Drought-Prone Districts Throughout Ethiopia
SO DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSITION AND DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA: THE UNIQUE CASE OF
   ETHIOPIA
LA English
DT Article; Book Chapter
DE Population pressure; Vulnerability Food/nutrition insecurity; Labor
   migration; Agricultural diversification; Malthusian Boserupian
   Resilience and adaptation; Climate change
AB This was a national, capacity-building vulnerability assessment and profiling project carried out in 16 carefully targeted drought-prone districts in 1999-2002 by the Ethiopian Federal government in collaboration with regional multisectoral government counterparts and university researchers. It used a coordinated, consensus-building approach of assessing interdisciplinary and multilevel aspects of population/food insecurity and disease interrelationships In the process, both Malthusian and Boserupian theories were used to hypothesize that demographic change and response are important risks as well as appropriate adaptations to frequent natural and human hazards. To compliment the scarcity and unreliability of secondary data and information systems from relevant ministries and international organizations, primary data were collected on a multistage, stratified random sample of 10,000 households in 93 communities in 16 drought-prone districts, and spread out in the four most populated regions. The most demographically vulnerable households were found to be either newly formed, or old age and/or female headed, or with many siblings under 10 years of age. The most important assets for household resilience to drought continue to be access to arable land, draft animals and adult labor Household coping strategies and resilience to structural vulnerability were common, with off-farm labor, temporary migration and income diversification as the more successful adaptations. This participatory research finds support for neither the Malthusian nor Boserupian effects, exclusively: there seems to be no direct and consistent causal relationship between crude population-land pressure, rapid population growth and vulnerability to food and nutrition insecurity. The effect of population density is a combination of contextual, technological, organizational, infrastructural and ecological factors and conditions. There are such large inter-district and agro-ecological variation in different types vulnerability that require contextual and micro-level assessment to establish valid criteria for targeting of more effective famine prevention, risk reduction and climate adaptation programs. As part of poverty and food insecurity/disaster risk reduction policies, demographic strategies would include labor migration, carefully planned resettlement, small and large urban center development, and delayed transitions to adulthood and childbearing.
C1 [Teller, Charles] Univ Addis Ababa, Coll Dev Studies, Ctr Populat Studies, Inst Populat Studies, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
   [Teller, Charles] George Washington Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Hlth Serv, Dept Global Hlth, Washington, DC USA.
   [Teller, Charles] George Washington Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Global Hlth, Washington, DC USA.
   [Teller, Charles] AAU, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
   [Teller, Charles] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA.
   [Teller, Charles] Inst Nutr Centroamer & Panama INCAP, WHO, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
   [Teller, Charles] UNFPA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
   [Teller, Charles] US Dept HHS, Off Int Hlth, Washington, DC USA.
   [Teller, Charles] Ctr Dev & Populat Act, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
   [Teller, Charles] US Agcy Int Dev, Washington, DC 20523 USA.
C3 Addis Ababa University; George Washington University; George Washington
   University; University of Texas System; University of Texas Austin;
   World Health Organization; Institute of Nutrition of Central America &
   Panama (INCAP); United Nations Population Fund; United States Agency for
   International Development (USAID)
RP Teller, C (corresponding author), Univ Addis Ababa, Coll Dev Studies, Ctr Populat Studies, Inst Populat Studies, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
EM profcharlesteller@gmail.com; profcharlesteller@gmail.com
CR ABERRA A, 2001, THESIS DTRC AAU
   ADAMO S, 2009, CLIMATE CHANGE POPUL
   ALWANG J, 2001, WORLD BANK WASH DC M
   AMARE Y, 2003, FORUM SOCIAL STUDIES, V3
   Amelework E, 2007, Historical and statistical review of the Ural region for 1904. Pamiatnaia knijka i Adres-kalendar Uralskoi
   Anderson MaryB., 1998, RISING ASHES DEV STR
   [Anonymous], 2006, Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2005
   [Anonymous], ETH DEM HLTH SURV 20
   ASSEFA D, 2003, FAMILY PLANNING SERV
   BIELLIL CG, 2001, POPULATION GROWTH EN
   BILSBORROW R, 1987, WORLD DEV, V15
   Bilsborrow R. E., 2001, Tradeoffs or synergies? Agricultural intensification, economic development and the environment, P35, DOI 10.1079/9780851994352.0035
   BOSERUP E, 1965, SUSTAINABILITY AGR R
   CSA, 1999, 1994 POP HOUS CENS E, V2
   De Sherbinin A, 2007, RURAL HOUSEHOLD DEMO
   Deressa T, 2008, 00806 IFPRI
   Devereux S., 2002, DESTITUTION NE HIGHL
   *DM FSS MOARD, 2009, JOINT GOV HUM PARTN
   DOWNING T, 1991, VULNERABILITY ASSESS
   *DPPA, 2007, LIV INT UN
   *DPPC, 1999, NAT GUID VULN PROF D
   *DPPC, 2002, BACKGR SUMM HIGHL 16
   *DPPC, 2002, DISTR VULN PROF
   *DPPC, 2002, P NAT SEL WER VULN P
   *DPPC, 2002, VULN PROF EACH 16 DR
   *DTRC PSTC, 1998, COMM FAM HLTH SURV 1
   *DTRC PSTC, 2000, MIGR GEND HLTH DEV
   *EEA, 2007, POP GROWTH EC DEV
   ETHIOPIA K, 2009, LINKING POPULATION F
   Ezra M, 2000, J BIOSOC SCI, V32, P395, DOI 10.1017/S0021932000003953
   Ezra M, 1997, DEMOGRAPHIC RESPONSE
   FERRISMORRIS M, 2002, PLANNING NEXT DROUGH
   *FEWSNET ETH, 2009, ETH FOOD SEC UPD FAM
   Frankenberger T.R., 2007, Ethiopia: The Path to Self-Resiliency
   HAGHEBAERT B, 2001, INT WORK C VULN DIS
   Hailemariam A, 1994, POPULATION DYNAMICS
   Hassan A., 2008, Vulnerability to Drought risk and famine: Local responses and external interventions among the Afar of Ethiopia: A study on the Aghini Pastoral Community
   HASSAN A, 2001, VULNERABILITY FAMINE
   *ISDR, 2005, WORDS ACT GUID IMPL
   *ISDR UN, 2002, LIV RISK GLOB REV DI
   JOY L, 1976, NUTR NATL DEV PLANNI
   Lautze Sue., 2003, Risk and Vulnerability in Ethiopia: Learning from the past, responding to the present, preparing for the future
   LITTLE R, 2006, J DEV STUDIES, V42
   LUTZ W, 2001, POPULATION ENV DEV A
   MARCHIONE T, 2003, FAM PREV STRAT FRAM
   *MOARD, 2010, NAT C DIS RISK MAN U
   NEGA B, 2005, ETHIOPIAS FATE ONE G
   PANKHURST A, 2004, HUNGER POVE IN PRESS
   PENDER J, 2001, POPULATION GROWTH EC
   PENDER J, 2004, LAND MANAGEMENT CROP
   Pender JL, 1998, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V19, P99, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5150(98)00024-3
   RHAMATO D, 1992, CODESRIA MONOGRAPH S, V2
   RHAMATO D, 2007, FORUM SOCIAL STUDIES, V4
   RHAMATO D, 2009, PEASANT STATE STUDIE
   RILEY B, 2002, IMPACT TITLE 2 FOOD
   SCHMIDT E, 2009, 5 ESSP 2 IFPRI ESDI
   Sen A.K., 1981, POVERTY FAMINES
   SHARP K, 2004, J HUMAN DEV, V5
   *SHAW CONS INT, 1993, VULN PROF FAM PRON A
   TACOLI C, 2007, MIGR AD CLIM CHANG S
   TEGENE B, 1996, INTEGRATION POPULATI
   TELLER C, 1997, C VULN ETH DIS DEV D
   TELLER C, 2005, IUSSP C TOURS FRANC
   TELLER C, 2010, C DIS RISK SCI SUST
   TELLER C, 2007, POP HLTH ENV C POP R
   TELLER C, 2010, PAA M DALL TX APR
   TELLER C, 2001, NAT VULN PROF TRAIN
   TELLER C, 1998, WORKSH MIGR HLTH GEN
   TELLER C, 2009, IUSSP MOR OCT
   TELLER C, 1996, WORKSH POP ENV NAT O
   TIFFEN M, 1994, 5 WORLD BANK
   Turner B.L., 1993, Population Growth and Agriculturrd Change in Africa
   *USAID ETH, 2004, RED FAM VULN HUNG PO
   WEBB P, 1992, 92 IFPRI
   Wolde-Mariam Mesfm., 1986, RURAL VULNERABILITY
   *WORLD BANK, 2007, ETH CAPT DEM BON ETH
NR 76
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 20
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA 233 SPRING STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10013, UNITED STATES
BN 978-90-481-8917-5
PY 2011
BP 237
EP 263
DI 10.1007/978-90-481-8918-2_12
D2 10.1007/978-90-481-8918-2
PG 27
WC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Book Citation Index – Social Sciences & Humanities (BKCI-SSH)
SC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
GA BUO52
UT WOS:000289928500012
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wang, ZY
   Han, F
   Li, CR
   Li, K
   Wang, Z
AF Wang, Zhiyong
   Han, Fang
   Li, Chuanrong
   Li, Kun
   Wang, Zhe
TI Analysis of Spatial Differentiation of NDVI and Climate Factors on the
   Upper Limit of Montane Deciduous Broad-Leaved Forests in the East
   Monsoon Region of China
SO FORESTS
LA English
DT Article
DE upper limit of montane deciduous broad-leaved forests; NDVI; spatial
   variation; the east monsoon region of China
ID VEGETATION; INDEX; PRECIPITATION; TREELINE; LAI
AB The vertical transition zone of mountain vegetation is characterized by high species diversity, and the width of the transition zone may serve as an indirect indicator of climate change. However, research into the differential characteristics of vegetation response to climate changes at the boundary of vertical transition zones has been limited. This study employs MODIS and climate data spanning 2001 to 2018 to investigate spatiotemporal trends in precipitation (PRE), temperature (TMP), radiation (RAD), and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) across nine montane deciduous broad-leaved forests in the eastern monsoon region of China. It explores the time-lag and -accumulation effects of climatic variables on NDVI, quantifying their relative contributions to both its short-term and interannual variations. Results show that, notably, with the Qinling-Daba Mountains as a demarcation, northern regions exhibit significant increases in RAD (0.874-2.047 W m(-2)/a), whereas southern regions demonstrate notable rises in TMP (0.59-0.73 degrees C/10a). Areas of lower annual PRE correspond to the most rapid increases in annual average NDVI (5.045 x 10(-3)/a). NDVI's lag time and cumulative duration responses to TMP are the shortest (0 and 2 similar to 4 periods), while its correlation with RAD is the strongest (0.815-0.975), generally decreasing from higher to lower latitudes. TMP significantly affects NDVI variations, impacting both short-term and interannual trends, with PRE driving short-term fluctuations and RAD dictating long-term shifts. This research provides critical data and a theoretical framework that enhances our understanding of how regional vegetation's vertical zonation responds to climate change, thereby making a substantial contribution to the study of mountain vegetation's diverse adaptability to climatic variations.
C1 [Wang, Zhiyong; Han, Fang; Wang, Zhe] Shandong Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Geomat, Zibo 255049, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Chuanrong; Li, Kun] Shandong Agr Univ, Coll Forestry, Tai An 271018, Peoples R China.
C3 Shandong University of Technology; Shandong Agricultural University
RP Han, F (corresponding author), Shandong Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Geomat, Zibo 255049, Peoples R China.
EM 21407010771@stumail.sdut.edu.cn; hanf@lreis.ac.cn; chrli@sdau.edu.cn;
   kunli@sdau.edu.cn; 21507020792@stumail.sdut.edu.cn
RI Han, Fang/HTR-7287-2023
OI wang, zhi yong/0000-0002-3919-0337
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China
FX No Statement Available
CR Baker BB, 2007, ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES, V39, P200, DOI 10.1657/1523-0430(2007)39[200:ATARGI]2.0.CO;2
   Bao C.L., 2020, Std. Surv. Map, V36, P14
   BARET F, 1991, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V35, P161, DOI 10.1016/0034-4257(91)90009-U
   Bochet E, 2004, RESTOR ECOL, V12, P166, DOI 10.1111/j.1061-2971.2004.0325.x
   Braswell BH, 1997, SCIENCE, V278, P870, DOI 10.1126/science.278.5339.870
   Brown L, 2000, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V71, P16, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00035-8
   Busetto L, 2010, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V16, P2504, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02189.x
   Cantón Y, 2004, CATENA, V55, P341, DOI 10.1016/S0341-8162(03)00108-5
   Chen L., 2014, FLORA VEGETATION GEO
   [邓晨晖 Deng Chenhui], 2018, [自然资源学报, Journal of Natural Resources], V33, P425
   Didan K., 2019, MODIS vegetation index user's guide (MOD13 series)
   Ding YX, 2020, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V92, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102179
   Engler R, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2330, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02393.x
   Ershadi A, 2015, J HYDROL, V525, P521, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.008
   Ge WY, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V773, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145648
   Gessner U, 2013, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V110, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.09.007
   Gourdji SM, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024041
   Greenwood S, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P3756, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12710
   Guo D., 2014, The Study of Topographic Controls on Altitudinal Belt on Changbai Mountain, P14
   Guo L, 2017, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V233, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.11.006
   Guo ZD, 2013, SCI CHINA LIFE SCI, V56, P661, DOI 10.1007/s11427-013-4492-2
   HOLBEN BN, 1980, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V46, P1191
   [侯光雷 Hou Guanglei], 2012, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V31, P285
   [黄春晓 Huang Chunxiao], 2023, [生态科学, Ecologic Science], V42, P114
   HUETE A R, 1988, Remote Sensing of Environment, V25, P295, DOI 10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X
   [吉珍霞 Ji Zhenxia], 2021, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V41, P6600
   Jiang RG, 2016, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V60, P1389, DOI 10.1007/s00484-015-1132-5
   Jin K., 2019, Spatio-Temporal Variations of Vegetation Cover and Its Relationships between Climate Change and Human Activities over China
   Jing Juan-li, 2023, Research of Soil and Water Conservation, V30, P232, DOI 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.016
   Kaufmann RK, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V107, DOI 10.1029/2001JD001516
   Krner C., 2012, Alpine Treelines: Treeline Formation-Currently, in the Past and in the Future
   Kumari N, 2020, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V47, DOI 10.1029/2020GL088918
   [雷茜 Lei Qian], 2023, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V43, P6378
   LePrieur C., 1994, REMOTE SENS REV, V10, P265, DOI [10.1080/02757259409532250, DOI 10.1080/02757259409532250]
   [李孟蔚 Li Mengwei], 2022, [水土保持研究, Research of Soil and Water Conservation], V29, P248
   [梁大林 Liang Dalin], 2022, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V42, P287
   [蔺鹏飞 Lin Pengfei], 2018, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V38, P3403
   Liu C., 2018, J GLOB CHANGE DATA D, V2, P42, DOI [10.3974/geodp.2018.01.08, DOI 10.3974/GEODP.2018.01.08]
   LIU HQ, 1995, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V33, P457, DOI 10.1109/36.377946
   Liu J.J., 2020, Study on the Influence of Mass Elevation Effect on Solar Radiation and Altitudinal Belt of Vegetation in the Qinling-Daba Mountains
   [刘琪 Liu Qi], 2023, [西北林学院学报, Journal of Northwest Forestry University], V38, P1
   Liu XianFeng Liu XianFeng, 2018, Scientia Agricultura Sinica, V51, P302
   Liu Y.N., 2020, Soils Crops, V9, P191, DOI DOI 10.11689/J.ISSN.2095-2961.2020.02.011
   [刘亚兰 Liu Yalan], 2010, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V30, P3912
   [刘艳丽 Liu Yanli], 2022, [水科学进展, Advances in Water Science], V33, P1
   [刘悦 Liu Yue], 2023, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V78, P729
   [卢训令 Lu Xunling], 2010, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V30, P5790
   Masson-Delmotte V, 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE 2021, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009157896
   Nemani RR, 2003, SCIENCE, V300, P1560, DOI 10.1126/science.1082750
   Peng SS, 2013, NATURE, V501, P88, DOI 10.1038/nature12434
   PINTY B, 1992, VEGETATIO, V101, P15, DOI 10.1007/BF00031911
   [秦进 Qin Jin], 2022, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V42, P7167
   Sanz-Elorza M, 2003, ANN BOT-LONDON, V92, P273, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcg130
   SEN PK, 1968, J AM STAT ASSOC, V63, P1379
   Shi CG, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0107874
   Shi Song, 2024, Huanjing Kexue, V45, P248, DOI 10.13227/j.hjkx.202211190
   Singh P, 1997, J HYDROL, V199, P183, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03222-2
   Sun R, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13020187
   [索南东主 Suo Nandongzhu], 2020, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V39, P2568
   Takahashi K, 2012, ANN BOT-LONDON, V109, P1165, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcs043
   Vicente-Serrano SM, 2014, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V23, P1019, DOI 10.1111/geb.12183
   [王鹏新 Wang Pengxin], 2003, [地球科学进展, Advance in Earth Sciences], V18, P527
   [王根绪 Wang Genxu], 2017, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V37, P3967
   Wang J.B., 2021, The Nations 1 km of the Countrys Surface Net Radiating Data Set during 20002018
   Wang J, 2021, FORESTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/f12091225
   [王军邦 Wang Junbang], 2017, [中国科学数据, China Scientific Data], V2, P73
   Wang Z.Y., Digit. J. Glob. Change Data Repos, P2023, DOI [10.3974/geodb.2023.11.09.V1, DOI 10.3974/GEODB.2023.11.09.V1]
   [王志勇 Wang Zhiyong], 2024, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V79, P240
   [魏书精 Wei Shujing], 2013, [生态环境学报, Ecology and Environmental Sciences], V22, P689
   Wu DH, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P3520, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12945
   [熊雪婷 Xiong Xueting], 2023, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V78, P2256
   [许丽 Xu Li], 2023, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V43, P7274
   Xu Yong, 2022, Huanjing Kexue, V43, P3230, DOI 10.13227/j.hjkx.202108107
   Yang WJ, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V612, P1007, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.180
   Yang X.M., 2015, Spatial-Temporal Variations of Desert Vegetation and Its Response to Climate Change in Hexi Area during 19822013
   [姚永慧 Yao Yonghui], 2010, [山地学报, Journal of Mountain Science], V28, P11
   Yuan J.G., 2015, Bull. Sci. Technol, V31, P47
   [张百平 Zhang Baiping], 2022, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V77, P2236
   Zhang L., 2022, J. Anhui Agric. Sci, V50, P57
   [郑景云 Zheng Jingyun], 2014, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V33, P3
   [朱高龙 Zhu Gaolong], 2013, [遥感学报, Journal of Remote Sensing], V17, P210
   Zhu ZC, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P791, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3004, 10.1038/nclimate3004]
   [卓嘎 Zhuo Ga], 2018, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V38, P3208
NR 83
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 13
U2 14
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 1999-4907
J9 FORESTS
JI Forests
PD MAY
PY 2024
VL 15
IS 5
AR 863
DI 10.3390/f15050863
PG 21
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA SC6W7
UT WOS:001232308900001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Hernández-Montiel, W
   Martínez-Núñez, MA
   Ramón-Ugalde, JP
   Román-Ponce, SI
   Calderón-Chagoya, R
   Zamora-Bustillos, R
AF Hernandez-Montiel, Wilber
   Alberto Martinez-Nunez, Mario
   Porfirio Ramon-Ugalde, Julio
   Ivan Roman-Ponce, Sergio
   Calderon-Chagoya, Rene
   Zamora-Bustillos, Roberto
TI Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Candidate Genes for Litter Size
   Traits in Pelibuey Sheep
SO ANIMALS
LA English
DT Article
DE prolificacy; Pelibuey sheep; genome-wide association study
ID INCREASED OVULATION RATE; LOCI AFFECTING RESISTANCE; FOLLICULAR
   DEVELOPMENT; INCREASED PROLIFICACY; BOOROOLA FECB; GDF9 GENE;
   EXPRESSION; PATHWAY; STERILITY; MUTATION
AB Simple Summary Reproductive traits are economically important in the livestock industry, and this is of greater relevance when it comes to indigenous animals, since their study allows improving their use and management. Through a genome-wide association study (GWAS), the reproductive trait of the litter size (prolificity) was analyzed in the indigenous Pelibuey sheep. Several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and candidate genes potentially associated with litter size trait were found in the multiparous ewe's group. These findings help to understand the genetic basis of reproductive traits of hairy Pelibuey sheep.
   Abstract The Pelibuey sheep has adaptability to climatic variations, resistance to parasites, and good maternal ability, whereas some ewes present multiple births, which increases the litter size in farm sheep. The litter size in some wool sheep breeds is associated with the presence of mutations, mainly in the family of the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) genes. To explore genetic mechanisms underlying the variation in litter size, we conducted a genome-wide association study in two groups of Pelibuey sheep (multiparous sheep with two lambs per birth vs. uniparous sheep with a single lamb at birth) using the OvineSNP50 BeadChip. We identified a total of 57 putative SNPs markers (p < 3.0 x 10(-3), Bonferroni correction). The candidate genes that may be associated with litter size in Pelibuey sheep are CLSTN2, MTMR2, DLG1, CGA, ABCG5, TRPM6, and HTR1E. Genomic regions were also identified that contain three quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for aseasonal reproduction (ASREP), milk yield (MY), and body weight (BW). These results allowed us to identify SNPs associated with genes that could be involved in the reproductive process related to prolificacy.
C1 [Hernandez-Montiel, Wilber; Porfirio Ramon-Ugalde, Julio; Zamora-Bustillos, Roberto] TecNM Inst Tecnol Conkal, Av Tecnol S-N, Conkal 97345, Yucatan, Mexico.
   [Hernandez-Montiel, Wilber] Univ Papaloapan, Dept Ciencias Agr, Loma Bonita Oaxaca 68400, Mexico.
   [Alberto Martinez-Nunez, Mario] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Ciencias, UMDI Sisal, Km 5, Merida 97302, Yucatan, Mexico.
   [Ivan Roman-Ponce, Sergio; Calderon-Chagoya, Rene] Ctr Nacl Invest Disciplinaria Fisiol & Mejoramien, INIFAP, Ajuchitlan Colon 76280, Queretaro, Mexico.
C3 Universidad del Papaloapan; Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
RP Zamora-Bustillos, R (corresponding author), TecNM Inst Tecnol Conkal, Av Tecnol S-N, Conkal 97345, Yucatan, Mexico.; Román-Ponce, SI (corresponding author), Ctr Nacl Invest Disciplinaria Fisiol & Mejoramien, INIFAP, Ajuchitlan Colon 76280, Queretaro, Mexico.
EM wilber.hernandez@itconkal.edu.mx; mamn@ciencias.unam.mx;
   julio.ramon@itconkal.edu.mx; roman.sergio@inifap.gob.mx;
   chagoya_91@hotmail.com; roberto.zamora@itconkal.edu.mx
RI Montiel, Wilber/JXN-9751-2024; ROMAN-PONCE, SERGIO/AAC-4154-2020;
   Calderón-Chagoya, Rene/KEH-2658-2024; ZAMORA, ROBERTO/HCH-8022-2022;
   Martinez Nunez, Mario Alberto/AAH-6079-2019
OI Hernandez Montiel, Wilber/0000-0001-6325-0873; CALDERON CHAGOYA,
   RENE/0000-0002-4450-8979; Martinez Nunez, Mario
   Alberto/0000-0001-8907-2542; Zamora-Bustillos,
   Roberto/0000-0002-4502-1492; ROMAN-PONCE, SERGIO
   IVAN/0000-0002-6704-6578
FU TecNM [5554.19-P]; CONACYT [176533]
FX This work was financially supported by TecNM (Grant No 5554.19-P) and
   partially supported by CONACYT (Grant No. 176533).
CR Abecia JA, 2018, ITAL J ANIM SCI, V17, P736, DOI [10.1080/1828051X.2017.1415705, 10.1080/1828051x.2017.1415705]
   Aké-López R, 2005, SMALL RUMINANT RES, V59, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.11.008
   Al-Mamun HA, 2015, GENET SEL EVOL, V47, DOI 10.1186/s12711-015-0142-4
   Alqudah AM, 2020, J ADV RES, V22, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.jare.2019.10.013
   Aoki-Kinoshita Kiyoko F., 2007, V396, P71
   Atlija M, 2015, GENET SEL EVOL, V48, DOI 10.1186/s12711-016-0182-4
   Balding DJ, 2006, NAT REV GENET, V7, P781, DOI 10.1038/nrg1916
   Beh KJ, 2002, ANIM GENET, V33, P97, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2002.00829.x
   Benavides MV, 2018, GENET MOL RES, V17, DOI 10.4238/gmr16039909
   Lôbo AMBO, 2009, GENET MOL BIOL, V32, P761, DOI 10.1590/S1415-47572009005000080
   Bobadilla-Soto E.E., 2018, INT J DEV RES, V5, P3607
   Bodin L, 2007, ENDOCRINOLOGY, V148, P393, DOI 10.1210/en.2006-0764
   Bonnet A, 2013, BMC GENOMICS, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-904
   Brinster R, 2018, BMC BIOINFORMATICS, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12859-018-2081-x
   Buels R, 2016, GENOME BIOL, V17, DOI 10.1186/s13059-016-0924-1
   Cavanagh CR, 2010, GENET SEL EVOL, V42, DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-42-36
   Chithrakshi, 2017, J ADV PHYS, V6, P375, DOI 10.1166/jap.2017.1338
   Chojnowski A, 2007, NEUROBIOL DIS, V26, P323, DOI 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.12.018
   CONSTANTINOU A, 1989, Small Ruminant Research, V2, P163, DOI 10.1016/0921-4488(89)90041-2
   Crawford AM, 2006, BMC GENOMICS, V7, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-7-178
   Davis GH, 2006, ANIM REPROD SCI, V92, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.06.001
   Gouveia JJD, 2017, LIVEST SCI, V197, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2017.01.006
   Demars J, 2013, PLOS GENET, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003482
   Dickinson RE, 2010, REPRODUCTION, V139, P697, DOI 10.1530/REP-10-0017
   Dickinson RE, 2010, REPRODUCTION, V139, P395, DOI 10.1530/REP-09-0182
   Dickson L, 2004, CUBAN J AGR SCI, V38, P13
   Duncan EL, 2013, GENETICS OF BONE BIOLOGY AND SKELETAL DISEASE, P93, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-387829-8.00007-X
   ENGLAND BG, 1981, ENDOCRINOLOGY, V109, P881, DOI 10.1210/endo-109-3-881
   Feary ES, 2007, BIOL REPROD, V77, P990, DOI 10.1095/biolreprod.107.062752
   Galloway SM, 2000, NAT GENET, V25, P279, DOI 10.1038/77033
   Garcia-Gámez E, 2013, J DAIRY SCI, V96, P6059, DOI 10.3168/jds.2013-6824
   Georgiopoulos G, 2016, GENET RES, V98, DOI 10.1017/S0016672316000069
   GONZALEZ A, 1987, J ANIM SCI, V64, P1717, DOI 10.2527/jas1987.6461717x
   GRUMMER RR, 1988, J ANIM SCI, V66, P3160
   Gu Y, 2018, FRONT PHARMACOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fphar.2018.01026
   Guéripel X, 2006, BIOL REPROD, V75, P836, DOI 10.1095/biolreprod.106.055574
   Gunawardena SR, 2008, J BIOL CHEM, V283, P398, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M706708200
   Gutiérrez-Gil B, 2009, ANIM GENET, V40, P423, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2009.01856.x
   Haldar A, 2014, ASIAN AUSTRAL J ANIM, V27, P628, DOI 10.5713/ajas.2013.13658
   Hanrahan JP, 2004, BIOL REPROD, V70, P900, DOI 10.1095/biolreprod.103.023093
   Harvey KF, 2012, CSH PERSPECT BIOL, V4, DOI 10.1101/cshperspect.a011288
   HINCH GN, 1989, APPL ANIM BEHAV SCI, V22, P39, DOI 10.1016/0168-1591(89)90078-6
   Hnia K, 2012, TRENDS MOL MED, V18, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.04.004
   Hong EJ, 2006, REPROD BIOL ENDOCRIN, V4, DOI 10.1186/1477-7827-4-49
   Huang DW, 2009, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V37, P1, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkn923
   Huang JHY, 2003, GENE EXPR PATTERNS, V3, P3, DOI 10.1016/s1567-133X(02)00096-0
   Jamalvandi M, 2018, MOL BIOL REP, V45, P413, DOI 10.1007/s11033-018-4176-x
   Jaouadi H, 2018, J HUM GENET, V63, P1077, DOI 10.1038/s10038-018-0492-1
   Jonas E, 2011, GENET SEL EVOL, V43, DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-43-22
   Kaler AS, 2019, BMC GENOMICS, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12864-019-5992-7
   Karamichou E, 2006, J ANIM SCI, V84, P3228, DOI 10.2527/jas.2006-204
   Kawashima I, 2018, SYST BIOL REPROD MED, V64, P3, DOI 10.1080/19396368.2017.1411990
   Komiya Y, 2015, INT J DEV BIOL, V59, P281, DOI 10.1387/ijdb.150196lr
   Krapivinsky G, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, pE7092, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1708427114
   Lantier I, 2012, ANIM GENET, V43, P632, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02291.x
   Lassoued N, 2017, BMC GENET, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12863-017-0510-x
   Cavatorta AL, 2017, EXP MOL PATHOL, V102, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.yexmp.2016.12.008
   Lehman MN, 2010, EUR J NEUROSCI, V32, P2152, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07530.x
   Li WT, 2017, J ANIM SCI BIOTECHNO, V8, DOI 10.1186/s40104-017-0208-y
   Lipina TV, 2016, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL, V41, P802, DOI 10.1038/npp.2015.206
   Pesántez-Pacheco JL, 2019, ANIMALS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/ani9040122
   Lyga S, 2016, ENDOCRINOLOGY, V157, P1613, DOI 10.1210/en.2015-1945
   Macías-Cruz U, 2012, ARCH MED VET, V44, P29, DOI 10.4067/S0301-732X2012000100005
   Macías-Cruz U, 2009, J APPL ANIM RES, V36, P255, DOI 10.1080/09712119.2009.9707071
   Martinez-Royo A, 2008, ANIM GENET, V39, P294, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01707.x
   Martinez-Royo A, 2017, THERIOGENOLOGY, V99, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.05.011
   Marziali F, 2019, BIOL CHEM, V400, P699, DOI 10.1515/hsz-2018-0350
   Mateescu RG, 2010, ANIM GENET, V41, P454, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02023.x
   McDonald R, 2019, FRONT ENDOCRINOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fendo.2019.00028
   Middelbeek J, 2010, CELL MOL LIFE SCI, V67, P875, DOI 10.1007/s00018-009-0215-z
   Monteagudo LV, 2009, ANIM REPROD SCI, V110, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.01.005
   Mruk DD, 2011, BIOCHEM J, V433, P253, DOI 10.1042/BJ20101267
   Nakagawa S, 2004, BEHAV ECOL, V15, P1044, DOI 10.1093/beheco/arh107
   Nelson SB, 1998, MOL CELL ENDOCRINOL, V140, P151, DOI 10.1016/S0303-7207(98)00043-4
   Nicol L, 2009, REPRODUCTION, V138, P921, DOI 10.1530/REP-09-0193
   Peñagaricano F, 2014, BMC GENOMICS, V15, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1034
   Phua SH, 2009, ANIM GENET, V40, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01803.x
   Platt A, 2010, GENETICS, V186, P1045, DOI 10.1534/genetics.110.121665
   Plewes MR, 2019, BIOL REPROD, V101, P1001, DOI 10.1093/biolre/ioz139
   Ponz R, 2001, MAMM GENOME, V12, P569, DOI 10.1007/s003350030007
   Purcell S, 2007, AM J HUM GENET, V81, P559, DOI 10.1086/519795
   Radhakrishnan A, 2012, J CELL COMMUN SIGNAL, V6, P169, DOI 10.1007/s12079-012-0168-0
   Roldan DL, 2010, ANIMAL, V4, P1330, DOI 10.1017/S1751731110000315
   Sahana G, 2010, ANIM GENET, V41, P579, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02064.x
   Sallé G, 2012, J ANIM SCI, V90, P4690, DOI 10.2527/jas.2012-5121
   Sankar A, 2017, DEVELOPMENT, V144, P3264, DOI 10.1242/dev.155473
   Santana MHA, 2015, J ANIM BREED GENET, V132, P420, DOI 10.1111/jbg.12167
   Sarker S, 2014, J TRANSL MED, V12, DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-12-204
   Silva BDM, 2011, ANIM GENET, V42, P89, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02078.x
   Simmons HM, 2005, GENE, V347, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.gene.2004.12.027
   Singh P, 2010, J OVARIAN RES, V3, DOI 10.1186/1757-2215-3-26
   Solomon-Zemler R, 2019, MOL GENET METAB, V126, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.ymgme.2019.01.002
   Sosa-Madrid BS, 2020, ANIM GENET, V51, P58, DOI 10.1111/age.12873
   Souza CJH, 2001, J ENDOCRINOL, V169, pR1, DOI 10.1677/joe.0.169R001
   Sundaresan V, 2004, J COMP NEUROL, V468, P467, DOI 10.1002/cne.10984
   Turner S.D., 2014, qqman: an R package for visualizing GWAS results using Q-Q and manhattan plots, P1
   Ulloa-Aguirre A., 2017, Endocrinology of the Testis and Male Reproduction, P1
   Våge DI, 2013, BMC GENET, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2156-14-1
   Volodarsky M, 2015, HUM MOL GENET, V24, P6485, DOI 10.1093/hmg/ddv357
   Wigginton JE, 2005, AM J HUM GENET, V76, P887, DOI 10.1086/429864
   Xu SS, 2018, FRONT GENET, V9, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2018.00118
   Ye HF, 2017, CELL PHYSIOL BIOCHEM, V41, P1051, DOI 10.1159/000464113
   Ye J, 2006, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V34, pW293, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkl031
   Zeng SQ, 2018, BMC GENOMICS, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12864-018-4855-y
NR 104
TC 35
Z9 39
U1 1
U2 13
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
SN 2076-2615
J9 ANIMALS-BASEL
JI Animals
PD MAR
PY 2020
VL 10
IS 3
AR 434
DI 10.3390/ani10030434
PG 17
WC Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science; Veterinary Sciences; Zoology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Veterinary Sciences; Zoology
GA LI3IM
UT WOS:000529378800067
PM 32143402
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Dayananda, B
   Murray, BR
   Webb, JK
AF Dayananda, Buddhi
   Murray, Brad R.
   Webb, Jonathan K.
TI Hotter nests produce hatchling lizards with lower thermal tolerance
SO JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate warming; Developmental plasticity; Incubation temperature;
   Amalosia lesueurii; Critical thermal limits
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; HEAT-SHOCK; DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER;
   INCUBATION-TEMPERATURE; ENDANGERED SNAKE; VELVET GECKO; ADAPTATION;
   RESPONSES; EVOLUTIONARY; SENSITIVITY
AB In many regions, the frequency and duration of summer heatwaves is predicted to increase in future. Hotter summers could result in higher temperatures inside lizard nests, potentially exposing embryos to thermally stressful conditions during development. Potentially, developmentally plastic shifts in thermal tolerance could allow lizards to adapt to climate warming. To determine how higher nest temperatures affect the thermal tolerance of hatchling geckos, we incubated eggs of the rock-dwelling velvet gecko, Amalosia lesueurii, at two fluctuating temperature regimes to mimic current nest temperatures (mean 23.2 degrees C, range 10-33 degrees C, 'cold') and future nest temperatures (mean 27.0 degrees C, range 14-37 degrees C, 'hot'). Hatchlings from the hot incubation group hatched 27 days earlier and had a lower critical thermal maximum (CTmax 38.7 degrees C) and a higher critical thermal minimum (CTmin 6.2 degrees C) than hatchlings from cold incubation group (40.2 and 5.7 degrees C, respectively). In the field, hatchlings typically settle under rocks near communal nests. During the hatching period, rock temperatures ranged from 13 to 59 degrees C, and regularly exceeded the CTmax of both hot- and cold-incubated hatchlings. Because rock temperatures were so high, the heat tolerance of lizards had little effect on their ability to exploit rocks as retreat sites. Instead, the timing of hatching dictated whether lizards could exploit rocks as retreat sites; that is, cold-incubated lizards that hatched later encountered less thermally stressful environments than earlier hatching hot-incubated lizards. In conclusion, we found no evidence that CTmax can shift upwards in response to higher incubation temperatures, suggesting that hotter summers may increase the vulnerability of lizards to climate warming.
C1 [Dayananda, Buddhi; Murray, Brad R.; Webb, Jonathan K.] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Life Sci, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia.
C3 University of Technology Sydney
RP Webb, JK (corresponding author), Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Life Sci, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia.
EM jonathan.webb@uts.edu.au
RI Dayananda, Buddhi/AAN-2100-2020
OI Webb, Jonathan/0000-0003-4822-6829; Dayananda,
   Buddhi/0000-0002-7607-0596; Murray, Brad/0000-0002-4734-5976
FU University of Technology Sydney
FX The research was supported financially by a grant from the University of
   Technology Sydney (to J.K.W.).
CR Amiel JJ, 2012, BIOL LETTERS, V8, P372, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2011.1161
   Angilletta MJ Jr, 2013, CONSERV PHYSIOL, V1, DOI 10.1093/conphys/cot018
   Angilletta MJ, 2002, J THERM BIOL, V27, P249, DOI 10.1016/S0306-4565(01)00094-8
   Angilletta MJ, 1998, COPEIA, P736, DOI 10.2307/1447806
   [Anonymous], 1989, BIOL EVOLUTION AUSTR
   Araújo MB, 2006, J BIOGEOGR, V33, P1712, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01482.x
   Araújo MB, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P1206, DOI 10.1111/ele.12155
   Booth DT, 2006, PHYSIOL BIOCHEM ZOOL, V79, P274, DOI 10.1086/499988
   Bowler K, 2005, J THERM BIOL, V30, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2004.09.001
   Buckley CR, 2007, EVOL ECOL RES, V9, P169
   Buckley LB, 2015, FUNCT ECOL, V29, P1038, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12406
   Chevin LM, 2010, PLOS BIOL, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000357
   CHRISTIAN KA, 1981, OECOLOGIA, V49, P218, DOI 10.1007/BF00349191
   Clusella-Trullas S, 2014, J COMP PHYSIOL B, V184, P5, DOI 10.1007/s00360-013-0776-x
   Clusella-Trullas S, 2011, AM NAT, V177, P738, DOI 10.1086/660021
   Cogger H.C., 2000, Reptiles and amphibians of Australia
   Cowan T, 2014, J CLIMATE, V27, P5851, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00092.1
   Croak BM, 2013, J APPL ECOL, V50, P432, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12040
   Croak BM, 2010, RESTOR ECOL, V18, P428, DOI 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00476.x
   Dayananda B, 2017, J ZOOL, V303, P46, DOI 10.1111/jzo.12460
   Dayananda B., 2017, DRYAD DIGITAL REPOSI
   Dayananda B, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P2405, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13231
   Deeming D.C., 2004, P229
   Doody JS, 2004, BIOL J LINN SOC, V81, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00250.x
   Doughty P, 1997, J HERPETOL, V31, P266, DOI 10.2307/1565395
   Feder ME, 1999, ANNU REV PHYSIOL, V61, P243, DOI 10.1146/annurev.physiol.61.1.243
   Gao J, 2014, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V281, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2014.1135
   Geerts AN, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P665, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2628
   Gilbert AL, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0146904
   Hansen J, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, pE2415, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1205276109
   Hoffmann AA, 2003, J THERM BIOL, V28, P175, DOI 10.1016/S0306-4565(02)00057-8
   Hoffmann AA, 2011, NATURE, V470, P479, DOI 10.1038/nature09670
   Huey R.B., 1982, Biology of Reptilia, V12, P25
   Huey RB, 2012, PHILOS T R SOC B, V367, P1665, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2012.0005
   HUEY RB, 1989, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V4, P131, DOI 10.1016/0169-5347(89)90211-5
   JANZEN FJ, 1994, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V91, P7487, DOI 10.1073/pnas.91.16.7487
   Kingsolver JG, 2011, INTEGR COMP BIOL, V51, P719, DOI 10.1093/icb/icr015
   Krebs RA, 1998, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V44, P1091, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1910(98)00059-6
   Krebs RA, 1997, CELL STRESS CHAPERON, V2, P60, DOI 10.1379/1466-1268(1997)002<0060:DCOHOI>2.3.CO;2
   Leal M, 2012, AM NAT, V180, P815, DOI 10.1086/668077
   Levy O, 2016, ECOL LETT, V19, P620, DOI 10.1111/ele.12595
   Levy O, 2015, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V282, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2015.0837
   Llewelyn J, 2016, DIVERS DISTRIB, V22, P1000, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12466
   Lutterschmidt WI, 1997, CAN J ZOOL, V75, P1553, DOI 10.1139/z97-782
   Moise A., 2015, Climate change in Australia projections for Australia's natural resource management regions: cluster reports
   Phillips B, 2016, FUNCT ECOL, V30, P1161, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12609
   Pounds JA, 1999, NATURE, V398, P611, DOI 10.1038/19297
   Radchuk V, 2013, J ANIM ECOL, V82, P275, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02029.x
   SCHLESINGER CA, 1994, HERPETOLOGICA, V50, P156
   Shine R, 2001, BIOL J LINN SOC, V72, P555, DOI 10.1006/bijl.2000.0516
   SINERVO B, 1989, OECOLOGIA, V78, P411, DOI 10.1007/BF00379118
   Sinervo B, 2010, SCIENCE, V328, P894, DOI 10.1126/science.1184695
   Sorensen JG, 2010, CURR ZOOL, V56, P703
   Telemeco RS, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P1075, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13476
   Telemeco RS, 2016, AM NAT, V188, pE13, DOI 10.1086/686628
   Tewksbury JJ, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P1296, DOI 10.1126/science.1159328
   Thomas CD, 2004, NATURE, V427, P145, DOI 10.1038/nature02121
   Urban MC, 2014, EVOL APPL, V7, P88, DOI 10.1111/eva.12114
   van Heerwaarden B, 2016, EVOLUTION, V70, P456, DOI 10.1111/evo.12843
   Walther GR, 2002, NATURE, V416, P389, DOI 10.1038/416389a
   Webb JK, 2006, AUSTRAL ECOL, V31, P432, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2006.01631.x
   Webb JK, 2005, COPEIA, P894, DOI 10.1643/0045-8511(2005)005[0894:CRRHQF]2.0.CO;2
   Webb JK, 2005, OIKOS, V110, P515, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13722.x
   Webb JK, 1998, BIOL CONSERV, V86, P233, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00180-8
   Webb JK, 2008, AUSTRAL ECOL, V33, P839, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2008.01852.x
NR 65
TC 30
Z9 34
U1 0
U2 31
PU COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
PI CAMBRIDGE
PA BIDDER BUILDING, STATION RD, HISTON, CAMBRIDGE CB24 9LF, ENGLAND
SN 0022-0949
EI 1477-9145
J9 J EXP BIOL
JI J. Exp. Biol.
PD JUN 15
PY 2017
VL 220
IS 12
BP 2159
EP 2165
DI 10.1242/jeb.152272
PG 7
WC Biology; Zoology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Other Topics; Zoology
GA EX6FH
UT WOS:000403337600010
PM 28615488
OA Green Published, Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Arefnejad, B
   Zeinalabedini, M
   Talebi, R
   Mardi, M
   Ghaffari, MR
   Vahidi, MF
   Nekouei, MK
   Szmatola, T
   Salekdeh, GH
AF Arefnejad, Babak
   Zeinalabedini, Mehrshad
   Talebi, Reza
   Mardi, Mohsen
   Ghaffari, Mohammad Reza
   Vahidi, Mohammad Farhad
   Nekouei, Mojtaba Khayam
   Szmatola, Tomasz
   Salekdeh, Ghasem Hosseini
TI Unveiling the population genetic structure of Iranian horses breeds by
   whole-genome resequencing analysis
SO MAMMALIAN GENOME
LA English
DT Article
ID COPY NUMBER; PAIRED-END; SEQUENCE
AB Preserving genetic diversity is pivotal for enhancing genetic improvement and facilitating adaptive responses to selection. This study focuses on identifying key genetic variants, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertion/deletion polymorphisms (INDELs), and copy number variants (CNVs), while exploring the genomic evolutionary connectedness among seven Iranian horses representing five indigenous breeds: Caspian, Turkemen, DareShuri, Kurdish, and Asil. Using whole-genome resequencing, we generated 2.7 Gb of sequence data, with raw reads ranging from 1.2 Gb for Caspian horses to 0.38 Gb for Turkoman horses. Post-filtering, approximately 1.9 Gb of reads remained, with similar to 1.5 Gb successfully mapped to the horse reference genome (EquCab3.0), achieving mapping rates between 76.4% (Caspian) and 98.35% (Turkoman). We identified 2,909,816 SNPs in Caspian horses, constituting around 0.1% of the genome. Notably, 71% of these SNPs were situated in intergenic regions, while 8.5 and 6.8% were located upstream and downstream, respectively. A comparative analysis of SNPs between Iranian and non-Iranian horse breeds showed that Caspian horses had the lowest number of shared SNPs with Turkoman horses. Instead, they showed a closer genetic relationship with DareShuri, Quarter, Arabian, Standardbred, and Asil breeds. Hierarchical clustering highlighted Caspian horses as a distinct cluster, underscoring their distinctive genomic signature. Caspian horses exhibit a unique genetic profile marked by an enrichment of private mutations in neurological genes, influencing sensory perception and awareness. This distinct genetic makeup shapes mating preferences and signifies a separate evolutionary trajectory. Additionally, significant non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) in reproductive genes offer intervention opportunities for managing Caspian horses. These findings reveal the population genetic structure of Iranian horse breeds, contributing to the advancement of knowledge in areas such as conservation, performance traits, climate adaptation, reproduction, and resistance to diseases in equine science.
C1 [Arefnejad, Babak] Univ Tehran, Dept Anim Sci, Karaj, Iran.
   [Zeinalabedini, Mehrshad; Talebi, Reza; Mardi, Mohsen; Ghaffari, Mohammad Reza; Vahidi, Mohammad Farhad] Agr Res Educ & Extens Org AREEO, Agr Biotechnol Res Inst Iran, Dept Syst & Synthet Biol, Karaj, Iran.
   [Nekouei, Mojtaba Khayam] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Biol Sci, Tehran, Iran.
   [Szmatola, Tomasz] Agr Univ Krakow, Ctr Expt & Innovat Med, Al Mickiewicza 24-28, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland.
   [Szmatola, Tomasz] Natl Res Inst Anim Prod, Dept Anim Mol Biol, Krakowska 1, PL-32083 Balice, Poland.
   [Salekdeh, Ghasem Hosseini] Macquarie Univ, Sch Nat Sci, Macquarie Pk, NSW 2109, Australia.
C3 University of Tehran; Tarbiat Modares University; University of
   Agriculture in Krakow; National Research Institute of Animal Production;
   Macquarie University
RP Zeinalabedini, M (corresponding author), Agr Res Educ & Extens Org AREEO, Agr Biotechnol Res Inst Iran, Dept Syst & Synthet Biol, Karaj, Iran.; Salekdeh, GH (corresponding author), Macquarie Univ, Sch Nat Sci, Macquarie Pk, NSW 2109, Australia.
EM m_zeinalabedini@yahoo.com; salekdeh@mq.edu.au
RI Szmatola, Tomasz/N-1021-2015; Zeinlabedini, Mehrshad/AAP-8051-2021;
   Salekdeh, Ghasem/E-4198-2012; Talebi, Reza/AAJ-8397-2020; Ghaffari,
   Mohammad Reza/KII-4990-2024
OI Salekdeh, Ghasem Hosseini/0000-0002-5124-4721; Szmatola,
   Tomasz/0000-0003-1588-4198; Ghaffari, Mohammad Reza/0000-0002-7139-8613;
   Zeinalabedini, Mehrshad/0000-0002-3436-4334; Talebi,
   Reza/0000-0002-5555-8453
FU University of Tehran, Iran
FX The authors would like to acknowledge the initial support provided by
   Dr. Hamid Kohram, former professor at the Department of Animal Science,
   College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran,
   Iran. In February 2020, Dr. Kohram passed away due to complications from
   COVID-19.
CR Ablondi M, 2020, ANIMALS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/ani10061005
   Ablondi M, 2019, BMC GENOMICS, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12864-019-6079-1
   Abyzov A, 2011, GENOME RES, V21, P974, DOI 10.1101/gr.114876.110
   Al Abri MA, 2021, ANIM GENET, V52, P304, DOI 10.1111/age.13056
   Alipour H, 2013, J EQUINE VET SCI, V33, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.07.005
   Amirinia Cyrus, 2007, Pak J Biol Sci, V10, P1540, DOI 10.3923/pjbs.2007.1540.1543
   Boeva V, 2012, BIOINFORMATICS, V28, P423, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr670
   Bolger AM, 2014, BIOINFORMATICS, V30, P2114, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
   Chen K, 2009, NAT METHODS, V6, P677, DOI [10.1038/NMETH.1363, 10.1038/nmeth.1363]
   Cingolani P, 2012, FLY, V6, P80, DOI 10.4161/fly.19695
   Criscione A, 2022, J ANIM BREED GENET, V139, P540, DOI 10.1111/jbg.12680
   CROW J F, 1970, P591, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330
   Doan R, 2012, BMC GENOMICS, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-78
   Durward-Akhurst SA, 2021, FRONT GENET, V12, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2021.758366
   Esdaile E, 2022, J HERED, V113, P238, DOI 10.1093/jhered/esab070
   Fages A, 2019, CELL, V177, P1419, DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.049
   Feng CWA, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-17854-5
   Garrison E., 2012, GENOMICS
   Handsaker RE, 2015, NAT GENET, V47, P296, DOI 10.1038/ng.3200
   HATAMIMONAZAH H, 1979, J REPROD FERTIL, V57, P331, DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.0570331
   Hendricks BonnieL., 2007, International Encyclopedia of Horse Breeds
   Hoglund J., Evolutionary Conservation Genetics, V6, P45, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199214211.003.0001, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199214211.003.0001, 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199214211.003.0001]
   Hossein-Zadeh NG, 2018, MAMM BIOL, V93, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.mambio.2018.07.004
   Hosseini M, 2016, MEDIA PETERNAK, V39, P155, DOI 10.5398/medpet.2016.39.3.155
   Howe KL, 2021, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V49, pD884, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkaa942
   Iqbal K, 2014, BIOL REPROD, V90, DOI 10.1095/biolreprod.113.113928
   Ivankovic A, 2021, ANIMALS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/ani11072130
   Jun J, 2014, BMC GENOMICS, V15, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-S9-S4
   Klecel W, 2021, ANIMALS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/ani11071859
   Lawson JM, 2024, EQUINE VET J, DOI 10.1111/evj.14057
   Li H, 2009, BIOINFORMATICS, V25, P1094, DOI [10.1093/bioinformatics/btp100, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324]
   Librado P, 2021, NATURE, V598, P634, DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-04018-9
   McKenna A, 2010, GENOME RES, V20, P1297, DOI 10.1101/gr.107524.110
   Mousavi SF, 2023, HEREDITY, V131, P96, DOI 10.1038/s41437-023-00624-7
   Orlando L, 2013, NATURE, V499, P74, DOI 10.1038/nature12323
   Petersen JL, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI [10.1371/journal.pone.0054997, 10.1371/journal.pone.0069819, 10.1371/journal.pone.0068620]
   Petersen JL, 2013, PLOS GENET, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003211
   Pluta Michal, 2020, Acta Scientiarum Polonorum - Zootechnica, V19, P79, DOI 10.21005/asp.2020.19.3.10
   Rausch T, 2012, BIOINFORMATICS, V28, pI333, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts378
   Rorvang MV, 2020, FRONT VET SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fvets.2020.00633
   Sadeghi R, 2019, J HERED, V110, P173, DOI 10.1093/jhered/esy061
   Ardestani SS, 2022, ANIM GENET, V53, P627, DOI 10.1111/age.13243
   Seyedabadi Hamidreza, 2006, Iranian Journal of Biotechnology, V4, P260
   Shasavarani H, 2010, AFR J BIOTECHNOL, V9, P293
   Talebi R., 2018, FRONT BIOL BEIJING, DOI [10.1007/s11515-018-1499-x, DOI 10.1007/S11515-018-1499-X]
   Talebi R, 2020, G3-GENES GENOM GENET, V10, P4615, DOI 10.1534/g3.120.401860
   Talebi R, 2021, ANIM BIOTECHNOL, V32, P388, DOI 10.1080/10495398.2019.1684933
   Talebi R, 2018, J ANIM SCI TECHNOL, V60, DOI 10.1186/s40781-018-0171-y
   Talebi R, 2018, THERIOGENOLOGY, V108, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.11.027
   Wang K, 2007, GENOME RES, V17, P1665, DOI 10.1101/gr.6861907
   Ye K, 2009, BIOINFORMATICS, V25, P2865, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp394
   Zandi MB, 2022, J HERED, V113, P421, DOI 10.1093/jhered/esac027
   Zhang DQ, 2018, DEVELOPMENT, V145, DOI 10.1242/dev.164723
NR 53
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 3
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 0938-8990
EI 1432-1777
J9 MAMM GENOME
JI Mamm. Genome
PD JUN
PY 2024
VL 35
IS 2
BP 201
EP 227
DI 10.1007/s00335-024-10035-6
EA MAR 2024
PG 27
WC Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology;
   Genetics & Heredity
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology;
   Genetics & Heredity
GA SG9T1
UT WOS:001190275800001
PM 38520527
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Vij, S
   Stock, R
   Ishtiaque, A
   Gardezi, M
   Zia, A
AF Vij, Sumit
   Stock, Ryan
   Ishtiaque, Asif
   Gardezi, Maaz
   Zia, Asim
TI Power in climate change policy-making process in South Asia
SO CLIMATE POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Policy-making processes; power interplay; climate change; adaptation and
   mitigation; South Asia
ID ADAPTATION; POLITICS; SECURITIZATION; BANGLADESH; CONFLICT; PATHWAYS;
   ENERGY; INDIA; WATER; FOOD
AB Climate change policies are prepared in a power-loaded environment, where different policy actors interact to meet their personal or collective interests. This paper argues that the 'power interplay' between actors plays a significant role in shaping and reshaping climate change policies. We present examples from South Asia (Nepal, India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan) to show how actors' power interplay at the local, sub-national, national and transboundary levels influences climate change policy-making. We show that negative effects of power interplay are prominent in the climate policy domain of South Asia, including short-termism of local adaptation plans, exclusion of certain policy actors in the policy-making processes, lack of transboundary-level adaptation, and lack of coordination between actors. Nuances also exist, such as the state's authority in prioritizing technical solutions, exclusionary design and implementation of climate policies, and an agenda of securitization; these can further marginalize the actors involved in climate change policy processes. The negative effects of power interplay in South Asia can limit the success of on-the-ground implementation of adaptation and mitigation strategies, limit adaptive capacity among communities, and possibly counter the development of a strong climate change solutions space. Lastly, we argue that there are no silver bullet solutions to power asymmetries and appeal to policy actors - in South Asia and elsewhere - to design context-specific and power-sensitive policy-making approaches.
   Key Policy Insights:
   Negative effects of power interplay have led to the exclusion of certain policy actors (especially communities at risk) in policy-making processes and a lack of transboundary-level adaptation in South Asia.
   Hard infrastructure-based adaptation measures tend to exacerbate the vulnerability of the communities at risk in South Asia.
   Policy actors must design context-specific and power-sensitive policy-making climate adaptation and mitigation approaches to reduce the negative impacts of power interplay.
C1 [Vij, Sumit] Wageningen Univ & Res, Sociol Dev & Change, Wageningen, Netherlands.
   [Stock, Ryan] Northern Michigan Univ, Dept Earth Environm & Geog Sci, Marquette, MI USA.
   [Ishtiaque, Asif] Missouri State Univ, Dept Geog Geol & Planning, Springfield, MO USA.
   [Gardezi, Maaz] Virginia Tech, Dept Sociol, Blacksburg, VA USA.
   [Zia, Asim] Univ Vermont, Dept Commun Dev & Appl Econ, Dept Comp Sci, Burlington, VT USA.
   [Vij, Sumit] Wageningen Univ & Res, Sociol Dev & Change, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands.
C3 Wageningen University & Research; Northern Michigan University; Missouri
   State University; Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University;
   University of Vermont; Wageningen University & Research
RP Vij, S (corresponding author), Wageningen Univ & Res, Sociol Dev & Change, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands.
EM sumit.vij@wur.nl
RI Gardezi, Maaz/ABI-1528-2020; Vij, Sumit/AAV-6617-2021; Ishtiaque,
   Asif/P-2423-2019
OI Stock, Ryan J./0000-0002-6218-3725; Gardezi, Maaz/0000-0003-0915-2652;
   Ishtiaque, Asif/0000-0002-2196-9764; zia, asim/0000-0001-8372-6090
CR Adnan MSG, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V682, P405, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.048
   [Anonymous], 2015, American International Journal of Social Science Research
   Ayers J, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V11, P62, DOI 10.1162/GLEP_a_00043
   Barua A, 2018, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V34, P829, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2017.1403892
   Bhave AG, 2018, WATER RESOUR RES, V54, P708, DOI 10.1002/2017WR020970
   Biesbroek GR, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P440, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.005
   Bizikova L, 2015, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V15, P1433, DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0705-x
   Brzoska M., 2009, SF Sicherheit und Frieden, V27, P137
   Buurman J, 2016, POLICY SOC, V35, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.05.002
   Buzan B., 1998, AM POLIT SCI REV, DOI [https://doi.org/10.2307/2586187, DOI 10.2307/2586187]
   Byers E, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aabf45
   Carstensen MB, 2016, J EUR PUBLIC POLICY, V23, P318, DOI 10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
   Colloff MJ, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V68, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.007
   DAHL RA, 1957, BEHAV SCI, V2, P201, DOI 10.1002/bs.3830020303
   Dewulf A, 2009, HUM RELAT, V62, P155, DOI 10.1177/0018726708100356
   Dhakal SP, 2014, CONTEMP SOUTH ASIA, V22, P290, DOI 10.1080/09584935.2014.931356
   Dubash NK, 2013, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V4, P191, DOI 10.1002/wcc.210
   Eriksen SH, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V35, P523, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.014
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Fuchs D, 2011, FOOD POLICY, V36, P729, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.07.013
   Giddens A, 2015, POLICY POLIT, V43, P155, DOI 10.1332/030557315X14290856538163
   Government of India, 2015, IND INT NAT DET CONT
   GPCL, 2015, CORPORATE SOCIAL RES
   Haines A, 2006, LANCET, V367, P2101, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68933-2, 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.01.002]
   Hajer M.A., 2003, Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society
   Hayward C., 2008, J POWER, V1, P5
   Head BW, 2019, POLICY SOC, V38, P180, DOI 10.1080/14494035.2018.1488797
   Huda MS, 2017, WATER INT, V42, P54, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2016.1236232
   Im ES, 2017, SCI ADV, V3, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1603322
   Ingold K, 2011, POLICY STUD J, V39, P435, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00416.x
   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2023, Climate Change 2021The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844.001, DOI 10.1017/9781009157940, 10.1017/9781009157896]
   Ishtiaque A, 2021, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V21, DOI 10.1007/s10113-021-01802-1
   Ishtiaque A, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI [10.5751/ES-09186-220305, 10.5751/es-09186-220305]
   Jonnalagadda I, 2021, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V45, P458, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.13002
   Klijn E.H., 2016, THEORY PRACTICE PUBL, V27, P158, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315714141-11
   Krott M, 2014, FOREST POLICY ECON, V49, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.012
   Mathur K., 2008, GOVT GOVERNANCE BRIE
   Mazhar N, 2020, South Asian Studies, V30, P149
   Mehta L, 2021, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V49, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.04.002
   Mirumachi N., 2015, Transboundary water politics in the developing world, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203068380
   Mishra A, 2019, HINDU KUSH HIMALAYA ASSESSMENT: MOUNTAINS, CLIMATE CHANGE, SUSTAINABILITY AND PEOPLE, P457, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-92288-1_13
   Nagoda S, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V35, P570, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.014
   Nightingale AJ, 2017, GEOFORUM, V84, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.011
   Ojha HR, 2016, CLIM POLICY, V16, P415, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2014.1003775
   Orsini A, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V13, P34, DOI 10.1162/GLEP_a_00182
   Peters K., 2016, The Securitization of Foreign Aid. Rethinking International Development Series, P212
   Rasul G, 2016, ENVIRON DEV, V18, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2015.12.001
   Rein Martin., 1996, Knowledge Policy, V9, P85, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF02832235, 10.1007/BF02832235]
   Stock R., 2021, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT
   Stock R, 2022, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102464
   Stock R, 2021, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102309
   Stock R, 2021, WORLD DEV, V138, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105196
   Stock R, 2020, GENDER PLACE CULT, V27, P1628, DOI 10.1080/0966369X.2020.1811208
   Stock R, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P2314, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-00676-3
   Stock R, 2021, J PEASANT STUD, V48, P984, DOI 10.1080/03066150.2019.1683002
   Susskind L., 2012, SCI DIPLOMACY, V1
   Swyngedouw E., 2011, Philosophy-Supplements Only, V69, P253, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1358246111000300
   Tanner T, 2011, IDS BULL-I DEV STUD, V42, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00217.x
   Tschakert P, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V40, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.004
   van der Steen M, 2016, FUTURES, V76, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2016.01.001
   Vij S, 2020, WATER INT, V45, P254, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2018.1554767
   Vij S, 2019, CLIM POLICY, V19, P571, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2018.1534723
   Vij S, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V78, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.09.007
   Vij Sumit, 2019, THESIS WAGENINGEN U
   Vink M., 2015, THESIS WAGENINGEN U
   Warner J, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN C-POLIT, V37, P1471, DOI 10.1177/2399654419834018
   Williams MC, 2003, INT STUD QUART, V47, P511, DOI 10.1046/j.0020-8833.2003.00277.x
   Wise RM, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002
   Yenneti K, 2015, ENERG POLICY, V86, P664, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.019
   Zia A., 2022, NINO READY NATIONS D, P63
   Zia A., 2017, REPORT US AID NOAA
NR 71
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 3
U2 5
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1469-3062
EI 1752-7457
J9 CLIM POLICY
JI Clim. Policy
PD JAN 2
PY 2024
VL 24
IS 1
BP 104
EP 116
DI 10.1080/14693062.2023.2271440
EA OCT 2023
PG 13
WC Environmental Studies; Public Administration
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public Administration
GA JM9J7
UT WOS:001087613400001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Chen, YL
   Ding, MH
   Zhang, G
   Duan, XW
   Wang, CX
AF Chen, Yueli
   Ding, Minghu
   Zhang, Guo
   Duan, Xingwu
   Wang, Chengxin
TI The possible role of fused precipitation data in detection of the
   spatiotemporal pattern of rainfall erosivity over the Tibetan Plateau,
   China
SO CATENA
LA English
DT Article
DE Rainfall erosivity; Tibetan Plateau; Empirical models; Gridded
   precipitation
ID SOIL LOSS; DATA SETS; R-FACTOR; DENSITY; EROSION; WATER
AB As a typical fragile ecological plateau area, the risk of water erosion on the Tibetan Plateau (TP) in China continues to increase with climate change. Rainfall erosivity is one of the most widely used indicators to assess the potential impact of rainfall events on water erosion. However, limited by the scarcity of historical in situ precipitation observations with sufficient spatiotemporal resolution, the estimates of rainfall erosivity over the TP have much larger biases than those of other regions in China. To accurately investigate the spatiotemporal evolution of rainfall erosivity, empirical models were first established to estimate monthly rainfall erosivity using 1-minute in situ precipitation observations from 1711 meteorological stations on the TP. The independent assessment showed that the correlation correction values between the observed and estimated monthly values were greater than 0.81 for all months. The annual rainfall erosivity data were then produced with a 0.1 degrees spatial resolution for the 1979-2018 period based on the China Meteorological Forcing Dataset (CMFD) precipitation data using newly established estimation models. Our results show that the CMFD-based estimates successfully captured the decreasing spatial pattern of the multiyear average annual rainfall erosivity from the southeast to northwest of the TP. In addition, the CMFD-based annual rainfall erosivity had a good linear relationship with the observed values but with a certain overestimation. Therefore, standardized annual rainfall erosivity values were used to detect the changes in rainfall erosivity. For most regions on the TP, annual rainfall erosivity values have exhibited significant increasing trends over the last 40 years. This study provides a theoretical basis and reference for controlling water erosion and climate adaptation on the TP.
C1 [Chen, Yueli; Ding, Minghu] Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, State Key Lab Severe Weather, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Guo] CMA Earth Syst Modeling & Predict Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Duan, Xingwu] Yunnan Univ, Inst Int Rivers & Ecosecur, Kunming, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Chengxin] Beijing Presky Technol Co Ltd, Beijing, Peoples R China.
C3 China Meteorological Administration; Chinese Academy of Meteorological
   Sciences (CAMS); Yunnan University
RP Ding, MH (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, State Key Lab Severe Weather, Beijing, Peoples R China.; Zhang, G (corresponding author), CMA Earth Syst Modeling & Predict Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China.
EM dingminghu@foxmail.com; zhangguo@cma.gov.cn
RI Ding, Minghu/AFU-3600-2022
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [42201156]; Second Tibetan
   Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) Program
   [2019QZKK0307]; Science and Technology Development Fund of Chinese
   Academy of Meteorological Sciences [2023KJ016]
FX This research was jointly supported by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (Grant No. 42201156), the Second Tibetan Plateau
   Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) Program (Grant No.
   2019QZKK0307), and the Science and Technology Development Fund of
   Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences (Grant No. 2023KJ016). Thanks
   to the National Tibetan Plateau Data Center (http://data.tpdc. ac.cn)
   for providing the dataset of river basins over the Tibetan Plateau.
CR Agnese C, 2006, J HYDROL, V329, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.02.002
   Angulo-Martínez M, 2009, J HYDROL, V379, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.09.051
   Bezak N., 2021, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V18, P2761, DOI [10.1175/JHM-D-17-0075.1, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-17-0075.1]
   Borrelli P, 2017, NAT COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-02142-7
   BROWN LC, 1987, T ASAE, V30, P379
   [操玥 Cao Yue], 2018, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V38, P8766
   Fischer F, 2016, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V223, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.03.024
   Freitas ED, 2020, J HYDROL, V589, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125128
   Gao YH, 2020, J HYDROMETEOROL, V21, P1531, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-19-0277.1
   Gu ZJ, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12010200
   He J, 2020, SCI DATA, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41597-020-0369-y
   Huffman GJ, 2007, J HYDROMETEOROL, V8, P38, DOI 10.1175/JHM560.1
   Kim JH, 2020, CATENA, V193, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104602
   Liu BY, 2020, INT SOIL WATER CONSE, V8, P430, DOI 10.1016/j.iswcr.2020.07.002
   [刘慧 Liu Hui], 2019, [中国沙漠, Journal of Desert Research], V39, P166
   Liu XD, 2000, INT J CLIMATOL, V20, P1729, DOI 10.1002/1097-0088(20001130)20:14<1729::AID-JOC556>3.0.CO;2-Y
   Lo A., 1985, Soil erosion and conservation, P384
   Lobo GP, 2015, J HYDROL, V527, P788, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.045
   Lukic T., 2021, Acta Geogr. Slov., V61, P123, DOI [10.3986/AGS.8754, DOI 10.3986/AGS.8754]
   Luo YL, 2016, J CLIMATE, V29, P8703, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0057.1
   Ma X, 2014, CATENA, V121, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2014.05.017
   Panagos P, 2017, J HYDROL, V548, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.006
   Panagos P, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V511, P801, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.008
   PANT PS, 1983, MON WEATHER REV, V111, P487, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1983)111<0487:APBFCI>2.0.CO;2
   Qi W, 2018, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V123, P13128, DOI 10.1029/2018JD029116
   Renard K., 1996, Agriculture Handbook, P703
   RENARD KG, 1994, J HYDROL, V157, P287, DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(94)90110-4
   Risal A, 2018, CATENA, V161, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2017.10.015
   Rodell M, 2004, B AM METEOROL SOC, V85, P381, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-85-3-381
   Sharma S, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12111836
   Shin JY, 2019, CATENA, V176, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2019.01.005
   Stainton J.D.A., 1972, Forests of Nepal
   Sun QH, 2018, REV GEOPHYS, V56, P79, DOI 10.1002/2017RG000574
   Tanarhte M, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V117, DOI 10.1029/2011JD017293
   Tapiador FJ, 2012, ATMOS RES, V104, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.10.021
   Tarek M, 2020, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V24, P2527, DOI 10.5194/hess-24-2527-2020
   Teng HF, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V635, P673, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.146
   Vrieling A, 2010, J HYDROL, V395, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.035
   Wang AH, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V117, DOI 10.1029/2011JD016553
   Wang YS, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V592, P639, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.235
   Wischmeier W. H., 1978, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook
   Xie Y., 2000, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V12, P6, DOI DOI 10.13870/J.CNKI.STBCXB.2000.04.002
   Xie Y, 2016, J HYDROL, V535, P547, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.020
   Yang F, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P5805, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-5805-2017
   Yang K, 2010, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V150, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.08.004
   Yin S, 2015, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V19, P4113, DOI 10.5194/hess-19-4113-2015
   [殷水清 YIN Shuiqing], 2007, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V26, P541
   Yu B, 1996, T ASAE, V39, P559, DOI 10.13031/2013.27535
   Yuan X, 2021, ATMOS RES, V264, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105875
   Yue TY, 2022, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V14, P665, DOI 10.5194/essd-14-665-2022
   Zhang G., 2019, DATASET RIVER BASINS, DOI [10.11888/BaseGeography.tpe.249465.file.CSTR:18046.11.BaseGeography, DOI 10.11888/BASEGEOGRAPHY.TPE.249465.FILE.CSTR:18046.11.BASEGEOGRAPHY]
   Zhou F.J., 1995, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V9, P13
NR 52
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 5
U2 38
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0341-8162
EI 1872-6887
J9 CATENA
JI Catena
PD JUL
PY 2023
VL 228
AR 107114
DI 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107114
EA APR 2023
PG 12
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Soil Science; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Agriculture; Water Resources
GA F3OY7
UT WOS:000981483400001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Batung, ES
   Mohammed, K
   Kansanga, MM
   Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H
   Luginaah, I
AF Batung, Evans Sumabe
   Mohammed, Kamaldeen
   Kansanga, Moses Mosonsieyiri
   Nyantakyi-Frimpong, Hanson
   Luginaah, Isaac
TI Credit access and perceived climate change resilience of smallholder
   farmers in semi-arid northern Ghana
SO ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience; Climate change; Credit access; Smallholder farmers; Ghana
ID UPPER WEST REGION; FOOD SECURITY; AGRICULTURAL MECHANIZATION;
   PERCEPTIONS; HOUSEHOLDS; SAVANNA; DROUGHT; DETERMINANTS; PRODUCTIVITY;
   VARIABILITY
AB While climate change is a global phenomenon, it has significantly stifled agricultural productivity in the Global South due to changes of key atmospheric elements including extreme temperatures and unpredictable rainfall over the last fifty years. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in sub-Saharan Africa where rainfed agriculture is the dominant livelihood strategy, climate change is increasingly undermining rural livelihoods. Despite several policy efforts to improve climate adaptation in this context, smallholders' lack of access to credit constitutes one of the crucial dimensions of climatic vulnerability. Using an ordered logistic regression model, this study analyzed data from a cross-sectional survey (n = 1,100) in the Upper West Region to examine the relationship between smallholder farmers' access to credit and their perceived climate change resilience. Findings show that households with access to credit from informal sources were more likely (OR = 1.73, p <= 0.05) to report good resilience compared to those without access. Households that received remittances were also more likely (OR = 3.26, p <= 0.001) to report good resilience compared to non-receiving households. Further, households that did not rear any livestock surprisingly emerged more likely (OR = 2.00, p <= 0.001) to report good resilience compared to those that reared livestock. On the contrary, households that had experienced any climatic events in the past 12 months before the study were less likely (OR = 0.29, p <= 0.01) to report good resilience compared to households that did not experience any events. These findings highlight the potential contribution of informal credit sources to improving rural agricultural productivity and climate change resilience. Informal credit sources may be capable of providing smallholder farmers with the needed access to more flexible financial credit options. The study provides policy recommendations on what might be useful to vulnerable groups, and others in similar contexts.
C1 [Batung, Evans Sumabe; Mohammed, Kamaldeen; Luginaah, Isaac] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Geog & Environm, 1151 Richmond St, Richmond, ON, Canada.
   [Kansanga, Moses Mosonsieyiri] George Washington Univ, Dept Geog, 2121 1 St NW, Washington, DC 20052 USA.
   [Nyantakyi-Frimpong, Hanson] Univ Denver, Dept Geog & Environm, 2050 East Iliff Ave, Denver, CO 80210 USA.
C3 Western University (University of Western Ontario); George Washington
   University; University of Denver
RP Batung, ES (corresponding author), Univ Western Ontario, Dept Geog & Environm, 1151 Richmond St, Richmond, ON, Canada.
EM ebatung@uwo.ca
OI Batung, Evans/0000-0003-1943-8646; Mohammed,
   Kamaldeen/0000-0003-0231-3142; Luginaah, Isaac/0000-0001-7858-3048;
   Nyantakyi-Frimpong, Hanson/0000-0002-6407-1970
FU Western Internal Social Science and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC)
   Explore grant [46416]
FX This study was funded by Western Internal Social Science and Humanities
   Research Council (SSHRC) Explore grant (Grant Number: ROLA #46416).
CR Abdul-Razak M, 2017, CLIM RISK MANAG, V17, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2017.06.001
   Abu BM, 2017, AGRIC FINANCE REV, V77, P524, DOI [10.1108/AFR-02-2017-0007, 10.1108/afr-02-2017-0007]
   Adaawen S, 2021, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/atmos12050594
   Adegbite D A., 2017, Journal of Sustainable Development, V4, P25
   Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Adiku S.G. K., 2017, Weather-index based crop insurance as a social adaptation to climate change and variability in the Upper West Region of Ghana: Developing a participatory approach
   Adinkrah M, 2012, SOC SCI MED, V74, P474, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.011
   Afifi T., 2016, Migration and Development, V5, P254, DOI [DOI 10.1080/21632324.2015.1022974, 10.1080/21632324, DOI 10.1080/21632324]
   Akudugu MA, 2016, AGRIC FINANCE REV, V76, P288, DOI 10.1108/AFR-12-2015-0058
   Alemayehu A, 2016, ENVIRON DEV, V19, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2016.06.002
   Anang BT, 2020, SCI AFR, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00219
   Angeler David G., 2021, Inland Waters, V11, P467, DOI 10.1080/20442041.2021.1893099
   [Anonymous], 2018, Third Ghana economic update: Agriculture as an engine of growth and jobs creation, DOI DOI 10.1093/NAR/GKR1098
   [Anonymous], 2016, Agriculture in Ghana: Facts and Figures
   [Anonymous], 2014, Ghana Living Standard Survey Round 6 (GLSS 6), P223, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.INFSOF.2008.09.005
   Ansong D, 2015, INT J BANK MARK, V33, P201, DOI 10.1108/IJBM-09-2013-0103
   Antwi-Agyei P, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P1615, DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0597-9
   Armah FA, 2011, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V16, P291, DOI 10.1007/s11027-010-9263-9
   Arndt C, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P7214, DOI 10.3390/su7067214
   Asiama J.P., 2007, Microfinance in Ghana: An Overview
   Asiedu-darko, 2013, E NO REGIONS GHANA, V5, P37, DOI [10.5897/JAERD12.121, DOI 10.5897/JAERD12.121]
   Asodina F A., 2020, Performance of Smallholder Soybean Farmers in Ghana; Evidence from Upper West Region of Ghana
   Atuoye KN, 2017, INT MIGR, V55, P18, DOI 10.1111/imig.12310
   Atuoye KN, 2019, SOC INDIC RES, V144, P899, DOI 10.1007/s11205-019-02062-7
   Barnett J, 2007, GEOGR COMPASS, V1, P1361, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00066.x
   Beller EE, 2019, BIOSCIENCE, V69, P80, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biy117
   Benin S, 2015, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V46, P103, DOI 10.1111/agec.12201
   Betzold C, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V133, P481, DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1408-0
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Brune L, 2016, ECON DEV CULT CHANGE, V64, P187, DOI 10.1086/684014
   Burkett P., 1988, Journal of Economic Development, V13, P81
   Chandio A. A., 2018, Agricultural Finance Review, V78, P592, DOI 10.1108/AFR-02-2017-0010
   Clapp, 2017, AL BASQ COUNTR CRIT
   Clapp J, 2018, DEV CHANGE, V49, P437, DOI 10.1111/dech.12376
   Collier P, 2014, WORLD DEV, V63, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.10.001
   Couharde C, 2015, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V20, P493, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X14000497
   Dapilah F, 2020, AMBIO, V49, P1437, DOI 10.1007/s13280-019-01275-x
   Dapilah F, 2020, CLIM DEV, V12, P42, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2019.1596063
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Di Gregorio M, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V54, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.003
   Dixon J, 2014, SOC SCI MED, V122, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.028
   DJEBOU DCS, 2017, AGR SWITZERLAND, V7
   Dong Fengxia., 2010, Effects of Credit Constraints on Productivity and Rural Household Income in China
   Duy, 2012, 284 CTR AS STUD, P284
   Etwire PM, 2020, AGR SYST, V179, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102773
   Fadiga M. L., 2004, COLLECTIVE ACTION IN
   Falk DA, 2019, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V7, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2019.00275
   Flory JA, 2018, J DEV ECON, V135, P517, DOI 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.07.015
   Folke C., 2003, Navigating social-ecological systems, P352
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Franzel Steven., 2019, The Climate-Smart Agriculture Papers, P277, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-92798-5_24
   Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), 2015, REG AN REP UPP W RE, P21
   Goulden MC, 2013, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V103, P906, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2013.765771
   GUNDERSON L, 2010, ECOL SOC
   Hananu B., 2015, African Journal of Agricultural Research, V10, P645
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Houssou N., 2017, Can Better Targeting Improve the Effectiveness of Ghana's Fertilizer Subsidy Program? Lessons from Ghana and Other Countries in Africa South of the Sahara
   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2019, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.024
   Jiri O, 2017, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V9, P151, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-07-2016-0092
   Jones L, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P229, DOI 10.1007/s10113-016-0995-2
   Junsheng H, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V238, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117934
   Kansanga MM, 2020, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V31, P1422, DOI 10.1002/ldr.3490
   Kansanga MM, 2017, INT J AGR SUSTAIN, V15, P708, DOI 10.1080/14735903.2017.1399515
   Khandker SR, 2005, WORLD BANK ECON REV, V19, P263, DOI 10.1093/wber/lhi008
   Kleinbaum DG, 2010, Logistic Regression: a Self-Learning Text, V3rd
   Konadu-Agyemang K, 2000, PROF GEOGR, V52, P469, DOI 10.1111/0033-0124.00239
   Kpienbaareh D, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9100356
   Krippner G.R., 2011, Capitalizing on Crisis: The Political Origins of the Rise of Finance
   Kuuire V, 2013, AFR GEOGR REV, V32, P125, DOI 10.1080/19376812.2013.791630
   Kuwornu JKM., 2012, J EC MANAGEMENT TRAD, DOI 10.9734/BJEMT/2012/2270
   Lipper L, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P1068, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2437, 10.1038/nclimate2437]
   Liverpool LSO, 2010, WORLD DEV, V38, P541, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.11.006
   Lolig V, 2014, J DISASTER RES, V9, P542, DOI 10.20965/jdr.2014.p0542
   LUCAS REB, 1985, J POLIT ECON, V93, P901, DOI 10.1086/261341
   Martinez G., 2021, Culture and Climate Resilience, P5
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   MILLER CJ, 1983, J DEV STUD, V19, P522, DOI 10.1080/00220388308421880
   MkNelly Barbara., 1999, FREEDOM HUNGER IMPAC
   Mohammed K, 2021, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V164, DOI 10.1007/s10584-021-03034-y
   Musah-Surugu IJ, 2018, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V10, P178, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2017-0054
   Nagarajan G., 2005, Rural finance: recent advances and emerging lessons, debates, and opportunities
   Nyantakyi-Frimpong H., 2012, Indigenous knowledge and climate adaptation policy in Northern Ghana, V41, P8
   Nyantakyi-Frimpong H, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V32, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.003
   Nyo A. K., 2016, Journal of Developments in Sustainable Agriculture, V11, P43
   Ofori-Sarpong E., 2001, West. Afr. J. Appl. Ecol, V2, P21
   Olney DK, 2015, J NUTR, V145, P1317, DOI 10.3945/jn.114.203539
   Oriangi G, 2020, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V12, P59, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2018-0069
   Owusu K, 2013, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V112, P419, DOI 10.1007/s00704-012-0736-5
   Ozowa V. N., 1995, Quarterly Bulletin of IAALD, V40, P15
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Rademacher-Schulz C, 2014, CLIM DEV, V6, P46, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2013.830955
   Reckien D, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V191, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.220
   Reyes A., 2012, Impact of access to credit on farm productivity of fruit and vegetable growers in Chile
   Saqib SE, 2018, INT J SOC ECON, V45, P644, DOI 10.1108/IJSE-12-2016-0347
   Schindler K, 2010, J DEV STUD, V46, P234, DOI 10.1080/00220380903002905
   Sekyi S, 2020, AFR J ECON MANAG STU, V11, P301, DOI 10.1108/AJEMS-03-2019-0121
   Songsore J., 2011, Regional Development in Ghana: the Theory and the Reality, VNew
   Tanko M, 2019, COGENT ECON FINANC, V7, DOI 10.1080/23322039.2019.1693121
   Tecson Kristen M, 2019, Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent), V32, P520, DOI 10.1080/08998280.2019.1625660
   Totin E, 2018, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V84, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2017.07.002
   Ung M, 2016, CLIMATE, V4, DOI 10.3390/cli4010001
   Walker B., 2004, Ecology and Society, V9, P5
   World Bank, 2015, ACC CLIM RES LOW CAR
   Yamane T., 1967, Research Methods: Determination of Sample Size
   Yaro JA, 2013, AFR GEOGR REV, V32, P72, DOI 10.1080/19376812.2012.759013
   Yidana A., 2018, Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, V9, P175
   Yu C., 2008, ENTREPRENEURSHIP CRE
   Zhai SY, 2018, J INTEGR AGR, V17, P949, DOI 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61753-2
   ,, 2020, The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2020: transforming food systems for affordable healthy diets, DOI 10.4060/ca9692en
NR 110
TC 15
Z9 15
U1 3
U2 21
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 1387-585X
EI 1573-2975
J9 ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN
JI Environ. Dev. Sustain.
PD JAN
PY 2023
VL 25
IS 1
BP 321
EP 350
DI 10.1007/s10668-021-02056-x
EA JAN 2022
PG 30
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 7S6RG
UT WOS:000747105500003
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Kim, MS
   Hanna, JW
   Stewart, JE
   Warwell, MV
   McDonald, GI
   Klopfenstein, NB
AF Kim, Mee-Sook
   Hanna, John W.
   Stewart, Jane E.
   Warwell, Marcus V.
   McDonald, Geral I.
   Klopfenstein, Ned B.
TI Predicting Present and Future Suitable Climate Spaces (Potential
   Distributions) for an Armillaria Root Disease Pathogen (<i>Armillaria
   solidipes</i>) and Its Host, Douglas-fir (<i>Pseudotsuga menziesii</i>),
   Under Changing Climates
SO FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; drought; potential distribution; root disease; species
   distribution modeling; tree maladaptation
ID BARK BEETLES COLEOPTERA; SOUTHERN INTERIOR; POPULATION-STRUCTURE;
   OSTOYAE; SPREAD; FOREST; MODEL; PLANTATIONS; SCOLYTIDAE; PHYLOGENY
AB Climate change and associated disturbances are expected to exacerbate forest root diseases because of altered distributions of existing and emerging forest pathogens and predisposition of trees due to climatic maladaptation and other disturbances. Predictions of suitable climate space (potential geographic distribution) for forest pathogens and host trees under contemporary and future climate scenarios will guide the selection of appropriate management practices by forest managers to minimize adverse impacts of forest disease within forest ecosystems. A native pathogen (Armillaria solidipes) that causes Armillaria root disease of conifers in North America is used to demonstrate bioclimatic models (maps) that predict suitable climate space for both pathogen and a primary host (Pseudotsuga menziesii, Douglas-fir) under contemporary and future climate scenarios. Armillaria root disease caused by A. solidipes is a primary cause of lost productivity and reduced carbon sequestration in coniferous forests of North America, and its impact is expected to increase under climate change due to tree maladaptation. Contemporary prediction models of suitable climate space were produced using Maximum Entropy algorithms that integrate climatic data with 382 georeferenced occurrence locations for DNA sequence-confirmed A. solidipes. A similar approach was used for visually identified P. menziesii from 11,826 georeferenced locations to predict its climatic requirements. From the contemporary models, data were extrapolated through future climate scenarios to forecast changes in geographic areas where native A. solidipes and P. menziesii will be climatically adapted. Armillaria root disease is expected to increase in geographic areas where predictions suggest A. solidipes is well adapted and P. menziesii is maladapted within its current range. By predicting areas at risk for Armillaria root disease, forest managers can deploy suitable strategies to reduce damage from the disease.
C1 [Kim, Mee-Sook] US Forest Serv, USDA, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA.
   [Hanna, John W.; McDonald, Geral I.; Klopfenstein, Ned B.] US Forest Serv, USDA, Rocky Mt Res Stn, Moscow, ID 83843 USA.
   [Stewart, Jane E.] Colorado State Univ, Dept Agr Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA.
   [Warwell, Marcus V.] US Forest Serv, USDA, Atlanta, GA USA.
C3 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); United States Forest
   Service; United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); United States
   Forest Service; Colorado State University; United States Department of
   Agriculture (USDA); United States Forest Service
RP Kim, MS (corresponding author), US Forest Serv, USDA, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA.; Klopfenstein, NB (corresponding author), US Forest Serv, USDA, Rocky Mt Res Stn, Moscow, ID 83843 USA.
EM meesook.kim@usda.gov; ned.klopfenstein@usda.gov
RI Warwell, Marcus/AAY-9868-2020
FU Forest Health Protection, Special Technology Development Program
FX Funding This project was partially funded by the Forest Health
   Protection, Special Technology Development Program (R1-2020-2,
   R4-2019-1, and R2-2018-1).
CR Berbee M., 2015, DIRECT GENBANK SUBMI
   Berbee M., 2014, DIRECT GENBANK SUBMI
   Blodgett J.T., 2011, P 58 W INT FOR WORK, V58
   Blodgett J.T., 2015, P 62 ANN W INT FOR D, P29
   Cannon P., 2008, P 55 W INT FOR DIS W, P29
   Chmura DJ, 2011, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V261, P1121, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.040
   Cruickshank MG, 2011, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V261, P297, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.10.023
   Cruickshank MG, 1997, CAN J FOREST RES, V27, P481, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-27-4-481
   Cruickshank MG, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V392, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.002
   DORFMAN DD, 1992, INVEST RADIOL, V27, P723, DOI 10.1097/00004424-199209000-00015
   Elías-Román RD, 2013, FOREST PATHOL, V43, P390, DOI 10.1111/efp.12043
   Eyring V, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P1937, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
   Feng X, 2019, ECOL EVOL, V9, P10365, DOI 10.1002/ece3.5555
   Ferguson BA, 2003, CAN J FOREST RES, V33, P612, DOI 10.1139/x03-065
   Fick SE, 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P4302, DOI 10.1002/joc.5086
   Hanna JW, 2007, FOREST PATHOL, V37, P192, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2007.00497.x
   Hanna J.W., 2005, Masters Thesis
   Hanna J.W., 2008, P 55 W INT FOR DIS W, P92
   Hanna J.W., 2014, P 61 ANN W INT FOR D, P117
   Hanna J.W., 2009, P 56 ANN W INT FOR D, P53
   Heinzelmann R, 2019, CAN J PLANT PATHOL, V41, P1, DOI 10.1080/07060661.2018.1558284
   Hermann R.K., 1990, SILVICS N AM
   HERTERT HD, 1975, CAN ENTOMOL, V107, P899, DOI 10.4039/Ent107899-8
   Hoffman Christ W., 2014, Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science, V45, P76, DOI 10.2181/036.045.0204
   JOHNSON ALS, 1972, FOREST CHRON, V48, P316, DOI 10.5558/tfc48316-6
   Khanum R, 2013, ACTA OECOL, V49, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.actao.2013.02.007
   Kim MS, 2006, FOREST PATHOL, V36, P145, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2006.00441.x
   Kim MS, 2000, MYCOLOGIA, V92, P874, DOI 10.2307/3761583
   Kliejunas J. T., 2009, General Technical Report - Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service
   Klopfenstein N.B., 2012, P 59 ANN W INT FOR D, P149
   Klopfenstein N.B., 2009, RES PAP RMRS RP 76, P10
   Klopfenstein NB, 2017, MYCOLOGIA, V109, P75, DOI 10.1080/00275514.2017.1286572
   김미숙, 2010, [Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science, 한국산림과학회지], V99, P251
   Kubiak K, 2017, FORESTS, V8, DOI 10.3390/f8040100
   KULHAVY DL, 1984, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V13, P813, DOI 10.1093/ee/13.3.813
   Kumar S., 2009, J ECOL NAT ENV, P94
   Little E.L., 1971, MISC PUBL USDA, V1146
   Lockman IB, 2016, RMRSGTR342 USDA FOR, V55, P342
   McDonald G. I., 1987, Research Note - Intermountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service
   McDonald G. I., 1987, Research Paper, Intermountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service
   McDonald G. I., 2000, P JOINT FIR SCI C WO, P195
   McDonald G.I., 1990, P MANAGEMENT PRODUCT, P129
   McDonald G.I., 1998, Proceedings of the 46th Annual Western International Forest Disease Work Conference, Compiled by L. Trummer. USDA Forest Service, P85
   McDonald G.I., 2011, P 58 ANN W INT FOR D, P135
   Morrison DJ, 2011, FOREST PATHOL, V41, P31, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2009.00630.x
   Morrison DJ, 2000, CAN J FOREST RES, V30, P405, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-30-3-405
   MORRISON DJ, 1981, BCX203 CAN FOR SERV
   Murray MP, 2021, FOREST CHRON, V97, P43, DOI 10.5558/tfc2021-006
   OMDAL DW, 1995, PLANT DIS, V79, P939, DOI 10.1094/PD-79-0939
   Parsons S, 2003, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V177, P559, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00448-6
   Peet FG, 1996, CAN J FOREST RES, V26, P148, DOI 10.1139/x26-016
   Phillips SJ, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V190, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
   Rehfeldt GE, 2006, INT J PLANT SCI, V167, P1123, DOI 10.1086/507711
   Rehfeldt GE, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V324, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.041
   Rehfeldt GE, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V324, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.035
   Remya K, 2015, ECOL ENG, V82, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.053
   RISHBETH J, 1978, T BRIT MYCOL SOC, V70, P213, DOI 10.1016/S0007-1536(78)80033-3
   Robinson RM, 2001, FOREST PATHOL, V31, P371, DOI 10.1046/j.1439-0329.2001.00260.x
   Ross-Davis AL, 2012, MYCOSCIENCE, V53, P161, DOI 10.1007/s10267-011-0148-x
   SHAW CG, 1989, PLANT DIS, V73, P775, DOI 10.1094/PD-73-0775B
   Steeger C, 1998, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V62, P1349, DOI 10.2307/3802001
   Stewart JE, 2020, EUR J PLANT PATHOL, V156, P751, DOI 10.1007/s10658-019-01926-5
   Stewart JE, 2018, FOREST PATHOL, V48, DOI 10.1111/efp.12378
   Sturrock RN, 2011, PLANT PATHOL, V60, P133, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02406.x
   Swart NC, 2019, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V12, P4823, DOI 10.5194/gmd-12-4823-2019
   Tang XG, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2021.652500
   Tkacz B.M., 1986, INT353 USDA FOR SERV, P7
   Van der Star T., 2003, DIRECT GENBANK SUBMI
   VANDERKAMP BJ, 1993, CAN J FOREST RES, V23, P1239, DOI 10.1139/x93-156
   Warwell MV, 2019, FORESTS, V10, DOI 10.3390/f10040294
   Weiskittel A. R., 2012, Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen, V163, P70, DOI 10.3188/szf.2012.0070
   Wiley E.O., 2003, OCEANOGRAPHY, V15, P120
   Worrall JJ, 2004, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V192, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.009
NR 73
TC 7
Z9 8
U1 3
U2 12
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2624-893X
J9 FRONT FOR GLOB CHANG
JI Front. For. Glob. Change
PD DEC 13
PY 2021
VL 4
AR 740994
DI 10.3389/ffgc.2021.740994
PG 11
WC Ecology; Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry
GA XW3LO
UT WOS:000735525300001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Yang, Y
   Li, J
AF Yang, Ya
   Li, Jun
TI Study on urban thermal environmental factors in a water network area
   based on CFD simulation A case study of Chengnan new district, Xiantao
   city, Hubei Province
SO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION
LA English
DT Article
DE CFD simulation; Thermal environment factors; Heat sensitive region;
   Water Network city; Climatic adaptation
AB Cities on the Jianghan plain with a dense water network have a hot and humid climate and a long period of calm wind in the summer. Urban design guidance of a water network with a thermal environment as the starting point is a design control path that takes into account geographical features, climatic conditions and urban construction under complex constraints. Based on the current block division and development intensity, this study of the thermal environment of Xiantao adopts the methods of multiple linear regression and wind-thermal environment simulation. The results show that regional agglomeration shows the spatial distribution of the urban thermal environment in the water network area. The distribution of hot sensitive areas is closely related to the pattern of clusters. The business district, high-density urban area, basic energy facility area and transportation hub are the thermal environment areas. The experimental results show that residential and industrial land, proportion of water area, average elevation and urban development intensity are the main factors influencing the thermal environment of the water network, and the strengths of their effects are in the order of development intensity > water area proportion > industrial land proportion > residential land proportion > average elevation. The urban thermal environment of the dynamic construction area can be inferred. The improvement of urban wind and thermal environment quality is implemented in the urban space level by guiding the construction intensity, ventilation, greening and water, and paving and shading of the thermal environment control area. The exploration of the thermal environment improvement method in the urban design of a water network region provides the guidance for similar cities seeking to cope with climate change. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Yang, Ya; Li, Jun] Wuhan Univ, Sch Urban Design, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China.
C3 Wuhan University
RP Li, J (corresponding author), Wuhan Univ, Sch Urban Design, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China.
EM hfyangya@hotmail.com; wuhanlunwen123@126.com
CR [Anonymous], 2005, THESIS
   Chao Ren, 2014, J URBAN PLAN
   Chen H., 2009, BUILD ENV, V44
   Daniel J., 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V46
   Gan Chen, 2019, J SHANDONG AGR U
   Giridharan R., 2004, ENERGY BUILD, V36
   Haoyan Liang, 2016, CHIN GARD, V32
   HE B, 2017, REMOTE SENS TECHNOL, V32
   Howard L., 1833, The Climate of London, Deduced from Meteorological Observations
   Jianguo Wang, 2011, URBAN PLAN, V35
   Junru Su, 2018, LAND NAT RESOUR RES
   Lei Wang, 2016, J EARTH SCI, V18
   Manley G., 1958, FREQUENCY SNOWFALL M
   Min Wang, 2018, LANDSC ARCHIT, V25
   Rui Y., 2018, ECOL INDIC, V89
   Wong N., 2007, BUILD ENV, V42
   Xin Pan, 2018, BEIJING SURV MAPP, V32
   Xinyu Yan, 2018, URBAN RURAL PLAN
   Ying Pan, 2018, CHIN J ECOL, V37
   Zhiqiang Lv, 2017, J CHONGQING U, V40
NR 20
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 1
U2 36
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2352-1864
J9 ENVIRON TECHNOL INNO
JI Environ. Technol. Innov.
PD NOV
PY 2020
VL 20
AR 101086
DI 10.1016/j.eti.2020.101086
PG 11
WC Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Engineering; Environmental
   Sciences & Ecology
GA PC6WL
UT WOS:000597138700004
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Weinstein, KJ
AF Weinstein, Karen J.
TI Thoracic morphology in Near Eastern Neandertals and early modern humans
   compared with recent modern humans from high and low altitudes
SO JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION
LA English
DT Article
DE neandertal; thorax; ribs; high-altitude adaptation; climatic adaptation;
   Shanidar; Tabun; Skhul
ID CHEST MORPHOLOGY; COLD ADAPTATION; BURIAL SITE; U-SERIES; ES-SKHUL;
   EVOLUTION; TIBETAN; TABUN
AB Paleoanthropologists have long noted the unique "hyper-barrel-shaped" Neandertal thorax as inferred from fragmentary ribs, clavicles, and sterna. Yet scholars disagree whether the Neandertal thorax represents an adaptation to cold climates or elevated activity levels.
   Given the difficulties of reconstructing overall chest shape from isolated and fragmentary thoracic skeletal elements, it is worthwhile comparing Neandertals and contemporaneous early modern human fossils from the same geographic region to recent modern human skeletons that are known to have enlarged chests. This study compares thoracic skeletal morphology in two Near Eastern Neandertals (Tabun Cl and Shanidar 3) and two early modern humans from the same region (Skhul IV and V) with four samples of recent modern human skeletons from the Andes (n = 347): two coastal groups and two groups from high altitudes. The two highland groups, similar to their living descendants, exhibit morphological evidence of anteroposteriorly deep and mediolaterally wide chests as part of respiratory adaptations to high-altitude hypoxia. I calculated the percentage of deviation of each Neandertal and early modern human fossil from the means of the four recent modem human samples for clavicle and rib lengths and curvatures.
   Shanidar 3 and Tabun C1 exhibit ribs that are slightly larger and less curved than the Andean samples, indicating slightly larger thoracic skeletons than modem humans who are known to have enlarged chests in response to increased respiratory demands. Skhul IV and V have significantly shorter ribs with greater curvature suggesting especially narrow thoracic skeletons. Comparisons with Andean populations suggest that the enlarged thoraces of Neandertals may reflect high activity levels, although results from this study do not exclude cold adaptation as an explanatory factor. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 Dickinson Coll, Dept Anthropol, Carlisle, PA 17013 USA.
C3 Dickinson College
RP Weinstein, KJ (corresponding author), Dickinson Coll, Dept Anthropol, POB 1773, Carlisle, PA 17013 USA.
EM weinstek@dickinson.edu
CR [Anonymous], 1981, Biometry
   [Anonymous], OCCASIONAL PAPERS AN
   Antón SC, 2002, J HUM EVOL, V43, P773, DOI 10.1006/jhev.2002.0602
   Arensburg B., 1991, Le Squelette Mousterian de Kebara 2, P113
   Bar-Yosef O, 1999, J HUM EVOL, V37, P879, DOI 10.1006/jhev.1999.0368
   Beall CM, 2000, HUM BIOL, V72, P201
   Beall CM, 2001, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V30, P423, DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.423
   BEALL CM, 1982, HUM BIOL, V54, P145
   BEALL CM, 1977, HUM BIOL, V49, P109
   Boule M., 1913, Annales de Paleontologie, V8, P1
   Boule M, 1912, ANN PALEONTOL, V7, P85
   Boule M., 1913, Ann. Paleontol., V6, P111
   Boule Marcellin., 1912, ANN PAL ONTOLOGIE, V7, P21
   Bramble DM, 2004, NATURE, V432, P345, DOI 10.1038/nature03052
   Brutsaert TD, 1999, AM J HUM BIOL, V11, P383, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(1999)11:3<383::AID-AJHB9>3.0.CO;2-X
   Churchill SE, 2007, VERTEBR PALEOBIOL PA, P113
   Churchill S. E., 1994, THESIS U NEW MEXICO
   Coon CarletonS., 1962, ORIGIN RACES
   Endo B., 1970, The Amud Man and his Cave Site, P231
   FRANCISCUS RG, 1989, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V78, P223
   Franciscus RG, 2002, J HUM EVOL, V42, P303, DOI 10.1006/jhev.2001.0528
   FRISANCHO AR, 1973, HUM BIOL, V45, P583
   Frisancho R.A., 1993, HUMAN ADAPTATION ACC
   Gorjanovic-Kramberger D., 1906, Der diluviale Mensch von Krapina in Kroatien. Ein Beitrag zur Palaoanthropologie
   Greksa L.P., 1989, HUMAN POPULATION BIO, P222
   Grün R, 2000, J HUM EVOL, V39, P601, DOI 10.1006/jhev.2000.0443
   Grün R, 2005, J HUM EVOL, V49, P316, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.04.006
   Grün R, 2006, YEARB PHYS ANTHROPOL, V49, P2, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.20516
   Heim JL., 1976, Archives de L'Institut de Paleontologie Humaine Memoire, V35, P1
   Holliday TW, 1997, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V104, P245, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199710)104:2<245::AID-AJPA10>3.0.CO;2-#
   Holliday TW, 2000, AM ANTHROPOL, V102, P54, DOI 10.1525/aa.2000.102.1.54
   Jellema Lyman M., 1993, P294
   McCown T.D., 1939, FOSSIL HUMAN REMAINS
   MERCIER N, 1993, J ARCHAEOL SCI, V20, P169, DOI 10.1006/jasc.1993.1012
   PAWSON IG, 1978, BIOL HIGH ALTITUDE P
   Ruff C, 2002, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V31, P211, DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085407
   Ruff Christopher B., 1994, Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, V37, P65
   Schultz A., 1969, The Chimpanzee: Anatomy, Behavior, and Diseases of Chimpanzees, V1, P50
   SCHULTZ AH, 1950, COLD SPRING HARB SYM, V15, P37, DOI 10.1101/SQB.1950.015.01.007
   SOLECKI RS, 1963, SCIENCE, V139, P179, DOI 10.1126/science.139.3551.179
   Sorensen MV, 2001, J HUM EVOL, V40, P483, DOI 10.1006/jhev.2001.0472
   Steegmann AT, 2002, AM J HUM BIOL, V14, P566, DOI 10.1002/ajhb.10070
   STEWART TD, 1988, P AM PHILOS SOC, V121, P121
   Stringer C, 2002, PHILOS T R SOC B, V357, P563, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2001.1057
   STRINGER CB, 1989, NATURE, V338, P756, DOI 10.1038/338756a0
   STRINGER CB, 1988, SCIENCE, V239, P1263, DOI 10.1126/science.3125610
   Trinkaus E., 1983, The Shanidar Neandertals
   Trinkaus Erik., 1981, ASPECTS HUMAN EVOLUT, P187
   Vallois H.V., 1965, Anthropol. Anzeiger, V29, P273
   Vandermeersch B., 1981, Les Hommes Fossiles de Qafzeh (Israel)
   Weinstein K. J., 2001, Comparative skeletal morphology of humans and macaques from high and low altitudes
   Weinstein KJ, 2007, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V134, P36, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.20619
   Weinstein KJ, 2005, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V128, P569, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.20137
   WILLIAMSBLANGERO S, 1993, AM J HUM BIOL, V5, P719, DOI 10.1002/ajhb.1310050615
NR 54
TC 32
Z9 41
U1 1
U2 11
PU ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI LONDON
PA 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON NW1 7DX, ENGLAND
SN 0047-2484
J9 J HUM EVOL
JI J. Hum. Evol.
PD MAR
PY 2008
VL 54
IS 3
BP 287
EP 295
DI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.08.010
PG 9
WC Anthropology; Evolutionary Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Anthropology; Evolutionary Biology
GA 320DV
UT WOS:000257214800002
PM 17949791
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wang, XH
   Xu, CS
   Xiong, DC
   Yao, XD
   Chen, TT
   Jiang, Q
   Jia, LQ
   Fan, AL
   Chen, GS
AF Wang, Xiaohong
   Xu, Chensen
   Xiong, Decheng
   Yao, Xiaodong
   Chen, Tingting
   Jiang, Qi
   Jia, Linqiao
   Fan, Ailian
   Chen, Guangshui
TI Root age-related response of fine root respiration of Chinese fir
   seedlings to soil warming
SO TREE PHYSIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE experimental warming; root lifespan; specific root length; subtropical
   plantation forest; thermal acclimation
ID SUGAR MAPLE; TEMPERATURE-ACCLIMATION; THERMAL-ACCLIMATION; INDIVIDUAL
   ROOTS; LARIX-GMELINII; BRANCH ORDER; LIFE-SPAN; NITROGEN; TRAITS;
   DEPOSITION
AB The variation in fine root respiration with root age provides insight into root adaptation to climate warming, but the mechanism is poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the respiratory response of fine roots (<1 mm and 1-2 mm) of different ages (2-, 4- and 6-month old) of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.)) seedlings to soil warming (4 degrees C above the control using cable heating). Fine roots were excised to measure the specific respiration rate at a reference temperature of 20 degrees C (SRR20), and root morphological and chemical traits were measured. Soil warming significantly increased SRR20 by 40% compared with the control, potentially indicating limited acclimation on a short time scale (6 months). However, soil warming increased SRR20 significantly in 2-month-old roots (by 72%) compared with 4- and 6-month-old roots, leading to a steeper decline in SRR20 with root age. This result suggests possible increased nutrient uptake efficiency in young fine roots under warmer temperatures. Soil warming significantly increased specific root length (SRL) but not root tissue nitrogen concentration (RTN). The variation in SRR20 between warming treatments, but not across root ages, was predicted by SRL and RTN individually or together. Our findings conclusively indicate that soil warming increased the respiration cost of young fine roots, which was predicted by adjusting for SRL and RTN, indicating that Chinese fir may adopt a faster fine root turnover strategy to enhance nutrient uptake and soil exploitation under warmer temperatures. Future studies should simultaneously investigate age-related root respiration and nutrient uptake in warming experiments to better understand the effects of warming on root metabolic activity.
C1 [Wang, Xiaohong; Xu, Chensen; Xiong, Decheng; Yao, Xiaodong; Chen, Tingting; Jiang, Qi; Jia, Linqiao; Fan, Ailian; Chen, Guangshui] Fujian Normal Univ, Key Lab Subtrop Mt Ecol, Minist Sci & Technol & Fujian Prov Funded, Sch Geog Sci, Shangsan Rd 8, Fuzhou 350007, Peoples R China.
C3 Fujian Normal University
RP Chen, GS (corresponding author), Fujian Normal Univ, Key Lab Subtrop Mt Ecol, Minist Sci & Technol & Fujian Prov Funded, Sch Geog Sci, Shangsan Rd 8, Fuzhou 350007, Peoples R China.
EM gschen@fjnu.edu.cn
RI Chen, Tingting/IUO-1039-2023; Yao, Xiaodong/HGD-2113-2022; Chen,
   Guangshui/B-8065-2013
OI Chen, Tingting/0000-0001-5421-6534
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [31830014]
FX This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (grant number 31830014).
CR Adams TS, 2013, TREE PHYSIOL, V33, P940, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpt067
   Atkin OK, 2000, NEW PHYTOL, V147, P141, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00683.x
   Atkin OK, 2003, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V8, P343, DOI 10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00136-5
   Augustine DJ, 2006, ECOSYSTEMS, V9, P1242, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0020-y
   Bouma TJ, 2001, NEW PHYTOL, V150, P685, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00128.x
   Bryla DR, 2001, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V24, P781, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00723.x
   Burton AJ, 2003, TREE PHYSIOL, V23, P273, DOI 10.1093/treephys/23.4.273
   Burton AJ, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P258, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02527.x
   Ceccon C, 2016, TREE PHYSIOL, V36, P618, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpw022
   Chen TT, 2021, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V308, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108612
   Comas LH, 2010, AUST J GRAPE WINE R, V16, P131, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2009.00078.x
   Di Iorio A, 2016, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V156, P294, DOI 10.1111/ppl.12363
   Drake JE, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P5069, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13771
   Eissenstat D. M., 1997, Advances in Ecological Research, V27, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60005-7
   Eissenstat DM, 2000, NEW PHYTOL, V147, P33, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00686.x
   FAO, 2020, Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: Main Report
   Gao J, 2021, GEODERMA, V394, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115011
   Gao XL, 2020, ECOL EVOL, V10, P3112, DOI 10.1002/ece3.6135
   Guo DL, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V180, P673, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02573.x
   Hajek P, 2014, PLANT SOIL, V377, P337, DOI 10.1007/s11104-013-2007-3
   Hishi T, 2007, J FOREST RES-JPN, V12, P126, DOI 10.1007/s10310-006-0260-5
   Hogan JA, 2021, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V173, P1008, DOI 10.1111/ppl.13498
   IPCC, 2014, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
   Jarvi MP, 2020, PLANT SOIL, V451, P435, DOI 10.1007/s11104-020-04540-1
   Jarvi MP, 2018, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V41, P504, DOI 10.1111/pce.13098
   Jarvi MP, 2013, TREE PHYSIOL, V33, P949, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpt068
   Jia SX, 2013, TREE PHYSIOL, V33, P579, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpt040
   Jia SX, 2011, TREE PHYSIOL, V31, P718, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpr057
   Kimball BA, 2008, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V14, P309, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01486.x
   Kumar P, 2007, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V21, P693, DOI 10.1007/s00468-007-0162-y
   Lambers H, 2019, PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL ECOLOGY, 3RD EDITION, P115, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-29639-1_3
   Liu Q, 2011, ECOL RES, V26, P637, DOI 10.1007/s11284-011-0824-5
   Lucash MS, 2007, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V21, P593, DOI 10.1007/s00468-007-0160-0
   Makita N, 2012, TREE PHYSIOL, V32, P303, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tps008
   McCormack ML, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V207, P505, DOI 10.1111/nph.13363
   McCormack ML, 2014, FRONT PLANT SCI, V5, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00205
   McCormack ML, 2012, NEW PHYTOL, V195, P823, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04198.x
   Melillo JM, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P9508, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1018189108
   Miyatani K, 2018, PLANT SOIL, V423, P215, DOI 10.1007/s11104-017-3499-z
   Mueller KE, 2016, ECOL LETT, V19, P956, DOI 10.1111/ele.12634
   Noh NJ, 2020, TREE PHYSIOL, V40, P1192, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpaa056
   National Forestry and Grassland Administration, 2019, Forest Resources in China 3 The 9 th National Forest Inventory
   Ostonen I, 2007, PLANT BIOSYST, V141, P426, DOI 10.1080/11263500701626069
   PALTA JA, 1989, ANN BOT-LONDON, V63, P651, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087794
   Parts K, 2019, ECOSYSTEMS, V22, P457, DOI 10.1007/s10021-018-0280-y
   Piao SL, 2009, NATURE, V458, P1009, DOI 10.1038/nature07944
   Reich PB, 2016, NATURE, V531, P633, DOI 10.1038/nature17142
   Roumet C, 2016, NEW PHYTOL, V210, P815, DOI 10.1111/nph.13828
   STEHMAN SV, 1995, CAN J FOREST RES, V25, P446, DOI 10.1139/x95-050
   Sullivan PF, 2008, ECOSYSTEMS, V11, P61, DOI 10.1007/s10021-007-9107-y
   Sun T, 2011, PLANT SOIL, V346, P375, DOI 10.1007/s11104-011-0825-8
   Tjoelker MG, 2008, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V14, P782, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01548.x
   Volder A, 2005, NEW PHYTOL, V165, P493, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01222.x
   Wang JS, 2021, NEW PHYTOL, V230, P1856, DOI 10.1111/nph.17279
   Weemstra M, 2020, FUNCT ECOL, V34, P575, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13520
   Wells CE, 2002, J PLANT GROWTH REGUL, V21, P324, DOI 10.1007/s00344-003-0011-1
   Xiong DC, 2018, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V123, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.05.009
   Zhou XH, 2013, TREE PHYSIOL, V33, P903, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpt064
NR 58
TC 7
Z9 9
U1 10
U2 82
PU OXFORD UNIV PRESS
PI OXFORD
PA GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND
SN 0829-318X
EI 1758-4469
J9 TREE PHYSIOL
JI Tree Physiol.
PD JUN 9
PY 2022
VL 42
IS 6
BP 1177
EP 1187
DI 10.1093/treephys/tpac004
EA JAN 2022
PG 11
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA CG7K6
UT WOS:000767432900001
PM 35043963
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Menegassi, SRO
   Pereira, GR
   Bremm, C
   Koetz, C
   Lopes, FG
   Fiorentini, EC
   McManus, C
   Dias, EA
   da Rocha, MK
   Lopes, RB
   Barcellos, JOJ
AF Oliveira Menegassi, Silvio Renato
   Pereira, Gabriel Ribas
   Bremm, Carolina
   Koetz, Celso, Jr.
   Lopes, Flavio Guiselli
   Fiorentini, Eduardo Custodio
   McManus, Concepta
   Dias, Eduardo Antunes
   da Rocha, Marcela Kuczynski
   Lopes, Rubia Branco
   Jardim Barcellos, Juio Otavio
TI Effects of ambient air temperature, humidity, and wind speed on seminal
   traits in Braford and Nellore bulls at the Brazilian Pantanal
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Thermal indexes; Adaptability; Tropical region; Semen parameters; Bulls
ID BOS-TAURUS BULLS; SCROTAL INSULATION; SPERM PRODUCTION; SEMEN QUALITY;
   BEEF BULLS; BOVINE TESTIS; INDICUS; CATTLE; THERMOGRAPHY; COLLECTION
AB The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioclimatic thermal stress assessed by Equivalent Temperature Index (ETI) and Temperature Humidity Index (THI) on Braford and Nellore bulls sperm quality during the reproductive seasons at the tropical region in the Brazilian Pantanal. We used 20 bulls aged approximately 24 months at the beginning of the study. Five ejaculates per animal were collected using an electroejaculator. Temperature, air humidity, and wind speed data were collected every hour from the automatic weather station at the National Institute of Meteorology. Infrared thermography images data were collected to assess the testicular temperature gradient in each animal. Data were analyzed with ANOVA using MIXED procedure of SAS and means were compared using Tukey's HSD test. The THI and ETI at 12 days (epididymal transit) were higher in January (89.7 and 28.5, respectively) and February (90.0 and 29.0, respectively) compared to other months (P < 0.01). Total seminal defects differ only in Bradford bulls between the months of November and February. Nellore bulls had lower major defects (MaD) and total defects (TD) compared to Braford. Nellore bulls showed correlation between minor defects (MiD) and THI for 30 days (0.90) and 18 days (0.88; P < 0.05). Braford bulls showed correlation for MaD (0.89) in ETI for 12 days (P < 0.05). Infrared thermography showed no difference between animals. Reproductive response to environmental changes is a consequence of Nellore and Braford adaptation to climate stress conditions. Both THI and ETI environmental indexes can be used to evaluate the morphological changes in the seminal parameters in Nellore or Braford bulls; however, more experiments should be performed focusing on larger sample numbers and also in reproductive assessment during the consecutive years to assess fertility potential.
C1 [Oliveira Menegassi, Silvio Renato; Pereira, Gabriel Ribas; Dias, Eduardo Antunes; da Rocha, Marcela Kuczynski; Lopes, Rubia Branco] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Anim Sci, Ave Bento Goncalves N 7712, BR-91540000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
   [Bremm, Carolina] FEPAGRO, Dept Anim Prod, BR-90130060 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
   [Koetz, Celso, Jr.; Lopes, Flavio Guiselli; Fiorentini, Eduardo Custodio] Univ Northern Parana, Coll Vet Med, BR-86041120 Londrina, PR, Brazil.
   [McManus, Concepta] Univ Brasilia, INCT Pecuaria, BR-70910900 Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
C3 Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; University Norte Parana;
   Universidade de Brasilia
RP Pereira, GR (corresponding author), Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Anim Sci, Ave Bento Goncalves N 7712, BR-91540000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
EM gabrielribaspereira@gmail.com
RI Dias, Eduardo/AAY-5058-2020; Bremm, Carolina/ABC-5134-2020; Pereira,
   Gabriel/J-4434-2015; Barcellos, Julio/A-9209-2013; Oliveira Menegassi,
   Silvio Renato/M-5162-2018; Pimentel, Concepta/I-4356-2012; Pereira,
   Gabriel/A-3903-2016; Bremm, Carolina/F-7393-2015
OI Barcellos, Julio/0000-0001-9858-1728; Oliveira Menegassi, Silvio
   Renato/0000-0003-4048-8269; Pimentel, Concepta/0000-0002-1106-8962;
   Pereira, Gabriel/0000-0002-8020-9845; Bremm,
   Carolina/0000-0002-7612-2771
FU Brazilian Council of Scientific and Technological Development (Project
   CNPq) [456724/2014-1]; Coordination for the Improvement of Higher
   Education Personnel/CAPES, Brazil (Project CAPES/PNPD) [2842/2010];
   Brazilian Hereford and Braford Association (ABHB)
FX This study was supported by The Brazilian Council of Scientific and
   Technological Development (Project CNPq/Universal No. 456724/2014-1) and
   The Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education
   Personnel/CAPES, Brazil (Project CAPES/PNPD No. 2842/2010). The authors
   thank Fazenda Tres Marias, Pitangueira Group, located in Santo Antonio
   de Leverger, Rondonopolis/MT, Brazil for providing the animals and
   technical assistance for this study. We thank the Brazilian Hereford and
   Braford Association (ABHB) for providing financial help and assistance
   with the experiment.
CR [Anonymous], 1971, A Guide to Environmental Research on Animals
   Baeta FC, 1987, SUMM M AM SOC AGR EN, P1
   BARTH AD, 1994, CAN VET J, V35, P93
   Barth AD, 2000, B BREEDING SOUNDNESS, P74
   Brito LFC, 2004, THERIOGENOLOGY, V61, P511, DOI 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00231-0
   Brito LFC, 2003, ANIM REPROD SCI, V79, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00082-4
   Burns BM, 2010, ANIM REPROD SCI, V122, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.04.010
   CASADY RB, 1953, J DAIRY SCI, V36, P14, DOI 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(53)91449-0
   Cheminau P, 1994, WORLD ANIM REV, V77, P2
   da Silva RG, 2007, REV BRAS ZOOTECN, V36, P1192, DOI 10.1590/S1516-35982007000500028
   De Rensis F, 2003, THERIOGENOLOGY, V60, P1139, DOI 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00126-2
   Fernandes CE, 2008, THERIOGENOLOGY, V70, P1560, DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.005
   Fernandes HJ, 2004, REV BRAS ZOOTECN, V33, P1581, DOI 10.1590/S1516-35982004000600026
   Fisch H, 2003, MED HYPOTHESES, V61, P21, DOI 10.1016/S0306-9877(03)00061-6
   INMET-Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia, 2014, NORM CLIM
   Kastelic JP, 1996, ANIM REPROD SCI, V41, P153, DOI 10.1016/0378-4320(95)01460-8
   Kastelic JP, 2001, CAN J VET RES, V65, P111
   Koivisto MB, 2009, REPROD DOMEST ANIM, V44, P587, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01023.x
   LEON H, 1991, THERIOGENOLOGY, V36, P349, DOI 10.1016/0093-691X(91)90463-N
   Mader TL, 2010, J ANIM SCI, V88, P2153, DOI 10.2527/jas.2009-2586
   McManus C, 2011, REV BRAS ZOOTECN, V40, P1576, DOI 10.1590/S1516-35982011000700025
   MEYERHOEFFER DC, 1985, J ANIM SCI, V60, P352, DOI 10.2527/jas1985.602352x
   Nichi M, 2006, THERIOGENOLOGY, V66, P822, DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.01.056
   Menegassi SRO, 2016, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V60, P151, DOI 10.1007/s00484-015-1013-y
   Menegassi SRO, 2015, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V59, P357, DOI 10.1007/s00484-014-0847-z
   Overton MW, 2002, J DAIRY SCI, V85, P2407, DOI 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74323-3
   Palmer CW, 2005, ANIM REPROD SCI, V87, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.09.004
   Pineda M.H., 1980, VET ENDOCRINOLOGY RE, P208
   Polguj M, 2015, BMC VET RES, V11, DOI 10.1186/s12917-015-0580-9
   Rengan AK, 2012, REPROD BIOL ENDOCRIN, V10, DOI 10.1186/1477-7827-10-92
   SAS, 2011, SAS STAT US GUID STA
   Silva RG, 2013, BIOMETEOROLOGY, V2, P261, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-5733-2-7, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5733-2-7]
   WROBEL KH, 1981, CELL TISSUE RES, V217, P289, DOI 10.1007/BF00233582
NR 33
TC 20
Z9 21
U1 1
U2 24
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA
SN 0020-7128
EI 1432-1254
J9 INT J BIOMETEOROL
JI Int. J. Biometeorol.
PD NOV
PY 2016
VL 60
IS 11
BP 1787
EP 1794
DI 10.1007/s00484-016-1167-2
PG 8
WC Biophysics; Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Physiology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biophysics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences; Physiology
GA EB3NY
UT WOS:000387273200015
PM 27067313
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Brocke, KV
   Trouche, G
   Weltzien, E
   Kondombo-Barro, CP
   Sidibé, A
   Zougmoré, R
   Gozé, E
AF Brocke, Kirsten Vom
   Trouche, Gilles
   Weltzien, Eva
   Kondombo-Barro, Clarisse P.
   Sidibe, Adama
   Zougmore, Robert
   Goze, Eric
TI HELPING FARMERS ADAPT TO CLIMATE AND CROPPING SYSTEM CHANGE THROUGH
   INCREASED ACCESS TO SORGHUM GENETIC RESOURCES ADAPTED TO PREVALENT
   SORGHUM CROPPING SYSTEMS IN BURKINA FASO
SO EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE
LA English
DT Article
ID PARTICIPATORY VARIETAL SELECTION; IMPROVEMENT; ETHIOPIA; MALI
AB Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is a major staple crop of Burkina Faso where farmers continue to cultivate photoperiod-sensitive guinea landraces as part of the strategy to minimize risk and ensure yield stability. In the Boucle du Mouhoun region, however, sorghum farmers appear to have insufficient varietal choice due to cropping systems having shifted towards more intensive cultivation of cotton and maize, and rainfall patterns having decreased over the past decade. In search for new varietal options that can respond to this changing context, researchers decided to give farmers access to ex-situ national collections along with the opportunity to evaluate recent improved varieties. From 2002 to 2007, researchers and farmers worked closely together to implement on-farm testing, including varietal selection trials, crop management and multi-locational trials. Farmers' choices tend to differ among groups, villages and years, with the exception of four particular landraces: two originating from a collection carried out in the Mouhoun region more than 30 years previous to this research, and two other landraces that came from the dissimilar agro-ecological zones of Burkina Faso. These four were the most commonly selected landraces out of 36 cultivars that covered both improved and landrace varieties. Farmers' selection criteria were focused on adaptation to agro-climatic conditions as well as specific grain qualities for processing and consumption. The potential usefulness of each variety was verified via multi-locational trials. The paper also shows that wide dissemination of experimental seed, not just across the Mouhoun region but also at a national scale, was largely achieved through collaboration with a strong farmer organisation in conjunction with farmer training programs focused on the on-farm seed production and the commercialisation of this seed.
C1 [Brocke, Kirsten Vom] CIRAD, UMR AGAP, ICRISAT, Bamako, Mali.
   [Trouche, Gilles] CIRAD, UMR AGAP, F-34398 Montpellier, France.
   [Weltzien, Eva] ICRISAT WCA, Bamako, Mali.
   [Kondombo-Barro, Clarisse P.] INERA, Programme Cereales Tradit, CRREA Ctr, Koudougou, Burkina Faso.
   [Sidibe, Adama] Union Grp Commercialisat Prod Agr, Dedougou, Burkina Faso.
   [Zougmore, Robert] ICRISAT WCA, CCAFS Reg Program West Africa, Bamako, Mali.
   [Goze, Eric] CIRAD, UPR SCA, F-34398 Montpellier, France.
C3 CIRAD; CGIAR; International Crops Research Institute for the
   Semi-Arid-Tropics (ICRISAT); Universite de Montpellier; CIRAD; CGIAR;
   International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid-Tropics
   (ICRISAT); CGIAR; International Crops Research Institute for the
   Semi-Arid-Tropics (ICRISAT); CIRAD
RP Brocke, KV (corresponding author), CIRAD, UMR AGAP, ICRISAT, BP 320, Bamako, Mali.
EM vom_brocke@cirad.fr
RI Gozé, Eric/JOK-7410-2023
OI Zougmore, Robert/0000-0002-6215-4852; Goze, Eric/0000-0001-9121-7835
FU Collaborative Crop Research Program of the McKnight Foundation; Fond
   Francais pour l'Environnement Mondial (FFEM)
FX We are grateful for the participation and contribution of farmers from
   the Burkinabe villages of Lekuy, Barakuy, Sanaba, Kera, and many more in
   the Mouhoun region. We also thank G. Pale, D. Kamboua, N. Bonzi and S.
   M. Ndiaye for their valuable technical support and advice, and M Halidou
   Compaore for designing the map in this manuscript. The study would not
   have been possible without the financial support of the Fond Francais
   pour l'Environnement Mondial (FFEM) and the Collaborative Crop Research
   Program of the McKnight Foundation, which funded this study. We also
   thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions. We
   further thank A. McGowan for the editing of the draft manuscript.
CR Akponikpe P. B. I, 2010, ICID 18 2 INT C CLIM
   ALMEKINDERS CJM, 1994, EUPHYTICA, V78, P207, DOI 10.1007/BF00027519
   Barro-Kondombo C, 2010, THEOR APPL GENET, V120, P1511, DOI 10.1007/s00122-010-1272-2
   Bazile Didier, 2004, Cahiers Agricultures, V13, P480
   Delaunay S, 2008, CAH AGRIC, V17, P189
   EBERHART SA, 1966, CROP SCI, V6, P36, DOI 10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x
   FINLAY KW, 1963, AUST J AGR RES, V14, P742, DOI 10.1071/AR9630742
   Friis-Hansen E., 2000, PARTICIPATORY APPROA
   Hansen JW, 2011, EXP AGR, V47, P205, DOI 10.1017/S0014479710000876
   Haussmann BIG, 2012, J AGRON CROP SCI, V198, P327, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2012.00526.x
   ICRISAT/INERA, 2003, INTERNAL REPORT
   Lacy SM, 2006, HUM ECOL, V34, P331, DOI 10.1007/s10745-006-9021-5
   McMillan M.S., 2011, NBER Working Paper Series
   Ministere de l'Agriculture de l'Hydraulique et des Ressources Halieutiques/Direction des Statistiques Agricoles (MAHRH/DGPSA), 2006, DONN PROD NAT
   Mulatu E, 2002, EUPHYTICA, V127, P11, DOI 10.1023/A:1019939721444
   Nicholson S, 2005, J ARID ENVIRON, V63, P615, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.03.004
   Seboka B, 2006, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V53, P1385, DOI 10.1007/s10722-005-5676-9
   Smale M, 2006, VALUING CROP BIODIVERSITY: ON-FARM GENETIC RESOURCES AND ECONOMIC CHANGE, P1
   Trouche G., 2002, SEL PART IMPL UT AM, P8
   Trouche Gilles, 1998, P197
   Trouche G, 2009, EXP AGR, V45, P451, DOI 10.1017/S001447970999041X
   Utz H.F., 2005, PLABSTAT VERSION 3A
   Vom Brocke K., 2011, GRAIN SEL, V52-53, P20
   vom Brocke K, 2010, FIELD CROP RES, V119, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.07.005
   Weltzien E, 2008, CAH AGRIC, V17, P134
   Witcombe JR, 1999, EXP AGR, V35, P471, DOI 10.1017/S0014479799354090
NR 26
TC 19
Z9 20
U1 1
U2 29
PU CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
PI NEW YORK
PA 32 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, NEW YORK, NY 10013-2473 USA
SN 0014-4797
EI 1469-4441
J9 EXP AGR
JI Exp. Agric.
PD APR
PY 2014
VL 50
IS 2
BP 284
EP 305
DI 10.1017/S0014479713000616
PG 22
WC Agronomy
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA AJ5KL
UT WOS:000337721000008
OA Green Accepted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Leiblein-Wild, MC
   Kaviani, R
   Tackenberg, O
AF Leiblein-Wild, Marion Carmen
   Kaviani, Rana
   Tackenberg, Oliver
TI Germination and seedling frost tolerance differ between the native and
   invasive range in common ragweed
SO OECOLOGIA
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptation; Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.; Intraspecific variation; Range
   expansion; Temperature
ID LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS; AMBROSIA-ARTEMISIIFOLIA; LOCAL ADAPTATION; GENETIC
   DIFFERENTIATION; ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION; PLANT INVASIONS; ALIEN PLANT;
   TEMPERATURE; POPULATIONS; RESPONSES
AB Germination characteristics and frost tolerance of seedlings are crucial parameters for establishment and invasion success of plants. The characterization of differences between populations in native and invasive ranges may improve our understanding of range expansion and adaptation. Here, we investigated germination characteristics of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L., a successful invader in Europe, under a temperature gradient between 5 and 25 A degrees C. Besides rate and speed of germination we determined optimal, minimal and maximal temperature for germination of ten North American and 17 European populations that were sampled along major latitudinal and longitudinal gradients. We furthermore investigated the frost tolerance of seedlings. Germination rate was highest at 15 A degrees C and germination speed was highest at 25 A degrees C. Germination rate, germination speed, frost tolerance of seedlings, and the temperature niche width for germination were significantly higher and broader, respectively, for European populations. This was partly due to a higher seed mass of these populations. Germination traits lacked evidence for adaptation to climatic variables at the point of origin for both provenances. Instead, in the native range, seedling frost tolerance was positively correlated with the risk of frosts which supports the assumption of local adaptation. The increased frost tolerance of European populations may allow germination earlier in the year which may subsequently lead to higher biomass allocation-due to a longer growing period-and result in higher pollen and seed production. The increase in germination rates, germination speed and seedling frost tolerance might result in a higher fitness of the European populations which may facilitate further successful invasion and enhance the existing public health problems associated with this species.
C1 [Leiblein-Wild, Marion Carmen] Biodivers & Climate Res Ctr BiK F, D-60325 Frankfurt, Germany.
   [Kaviani, Rana; Tackenberg, Oliver] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Ecol Evolut & Divers, D-60438 Frankfurt, Germany.
C3 Leibniz Association; Senckenberg Gesellschaft fur Naturforschung (SGN);
   Senckenberg Biodiversitat & Klima- Forschungszentrum (BiK-F); Goethe
   University Frankfurt
RP Leiblein-Wild, MC (corresponding author), Biodivers & Climate Res Ctr BiK F, Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt, Germany.
EM mleiblein@senckenberg.de
RI Tackenberg, Oliver/AAY-1345-2020
FU LOEWE-Landes-Offensive zur Entwicklung wissenschaftlich-okonomischer
   Exzellenz program of Hesse's Ministry of Higher Education, Research, and
   the Arts
FX The present study was conducted at the Biodiversity and Climate Research
   Centre (BiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, and was funded by the
   LOEWE-Landes-Offensive zur Entwicklung wissenschaftlich-okonomischer
   Exzellenz program of Hesse's Ministry of Higher Education, Research, and
   the Arts. We thank Stefan and Anne Koller, Cornelia Baucker, Jitka
   Klimesova and Felix Heydel for contributing A. artemisiifolia seed
   material. We acknowledge the E-OBS dataset from the EU-FP6 project
   ENSEMBLES (http://ensembles-eu.metoffice.com) and the data providers in
   the ECA&D project(http://www.ecad.eu). We acknowledge Sarah Cunze and
   Christoph Brendle for help in the processing of environmental data, and
   Daniel Jordan Grobbel-Rank for the improvement of the English.
   Constructive suggestions of reviewers of previous versions of the
   manuscript greatly improved the present paper. The experiments comply
   with the current laws in Germany. The authors declare that they have no
   conflict of interest.
CR [Anonymous], 2003, Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany
   [Anonymous], J ECOL
   [Anonymous], BIOL INVASI IN PRESS
   [Anonymous], TUEXENIA
   Bannister P, 2001, J BIOGEOGR, V28, P589, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00573.x
   Becker U, 2006, OECOLOGIA, V150, P506, DOI 10.1007/s00442-006-0534-9
   Beckmann M, 2011, ECOL RES, V26, P763, DOI 10.1007/s11284-011-0834-3
   Berger S, 2007, PHYTOCOENOLOGIA, V37, P523, DOI 10.1127/0340-269X/2007/0037-0523
   Blair AC, 2004, ECOLOGY, V85, P3035, DOI 10.1890/04-0341
   Bossdorf O, 2005, OECOLOGIA, V144, P1, DOI 10.1007/s00442-005-0070-z
   Bruelheide H, 2002, FLORA, V197, P475, DOI 10.1078/0367-2530-00064
   Cervera JC, 2009, PLANT ECOL, V205, P285, DOI 10.1007/s11258-009-9617-0
   Chauvel B, 2006, J BIOGEOGR, V33, P665, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01401.x
   Chun YJ, 2011, MOL ECOL, V20, P1378, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05013.x
   Cunze S., 2013, Int Sch Res, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1155/2013/610126, 10.1155/2013/610126]
   De Frenne P, 2009, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V18, P641, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00487.x
   Deen W, 1998, WEED SCI, V46, P555, DOI 10.1017/S0043174500091098
   DICKERSON CT, 1971, WEED SCI, V19, P64, DOI 10.1017/S0043174500048281
   DiTommaso A, 2004, WEED SCI, V52, P1002, DOI 10.1614/WS-04-030R1
   Dlugosch KM, 2008, MOL ECOL, V17, P431, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03538.x
   Donohue K, 2010, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V41, P293, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144715
   Dukes JS, 1999, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V14, P135, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01554-7
   Ebeling SK, 2008, ECOGRAPHY, V31, P709, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05470.x
   Ellstrand NC, 2000, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V97, P7043, DOI [10.1073/pnas.97.13.7043, 10.1007/s10681-006-5939-3]
   Erfmeier A, 2005, ECOGRAPHY, V28, P417, DOI 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03967.x
   Forcella F, 1997, WEED SCI, V45, P67, DOI 10.1017/S0043174500092493
   Franklin J, 1995, PROG PHYS GEOG, V19, P474, DOI 10.1177/030913339501900403
   Fumanal B, 2007, ANN AGR ENV MED, V14, P233
   Genton BJ, 2005, MOL ECOL, V14, P4275, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02750.x
   Gerhold P, 2011, AM NAT, V177, P668, DOI 10.1086/659059
   Gladieux P, 2011, BIOL INVASIONS, V13, P933, DOI 10.1007/s10530-010-9880-y
   Gregor T, 2013, TUEXENIA, P259
   GRIME JP, 1981, J ECOL, V69, P1017, DOI 10.2307/2259651
   Guillemin JP, 2013, WEED RES, V53, P76, DOI 10.1111/wre.12000
   Hierro JL, 2005, J ECOL, V93, P5, DOI 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00953.x
   Hierro JL, 2009, OIKOS, V118, P529, DOI [10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17283.x, 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17283.x]
   Hodgins KA, 2011, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V24, P2731, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02404.x
   Joshi J, 2001, ECOL LETT, V4, P536, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00262.x
   Kazinczi G., 2008, Herbologia, V9, P55
   Keane RM, 2002, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V17, P164, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02499-0
   Kollmann J, 2004, DIVERS DISTRIB, V10, P377, DOI 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00126.x
   Kowarik I., 2010, Biologische Invasionen. Neophyten und Neozoen in Mitteleuropa, V2nd edn
   Kriticos DJ, 2003, J APPL ECOL, V40, P111, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00777.x
   Lavergne S, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P3883, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0607324104
   Lee CE, 2002, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V17, P386, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02554-5
   Leger EA, 2007, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V20, P1090, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01292.x
   Makra L, 2004, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V49, P37, DOI 10.1007/s00484-004-0208-4
   Mandák B, 2003, FLORA, V198, P45, DOI 10.1078/0367-2530-00075
   Merrill KR, 2012, AM J BOT, V99, P529, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1100085
   Montague JL, 2008, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V21, P234, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01456.x
   Parmesan C, 2006, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V37, P637, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
   PAYNE WW, 1961, J ALLERGY, V32, P241, DOI 10.1016/0021-8707(61)90054-5
   PICKETT ST, 1973, B TORREY BOT CLUB, V100, P165, DOI 10.2307/2484628
   Prentis PJ, 2008, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V13, P288, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.03.004
   Radford IJ, 2000, OECOLOGIA, V125, P531, DOI 10.1007/s004420000474
   RATHCKE B, 1985, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V16, P179, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.001143
   Sakai AK, 2001, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V32, P305, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114037
   Sala OE, 2000, SCIENCE, V287, P1770, DOI 10.1126/science.287.5459.1770
   Skálová H, 2011, PERSPECT PLANT ECOL, V13, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.ppees.2011.03.005
   Stephenson TS, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V113, DOI 10.1029/2007JD009127
   Taramarcaz P, 2005, SWISS MED WKLY, V135, P538
   Thuiller W, 2006, ECOLOGY, V87, P1755, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1755:IBESTA]2.0.CO;2
   Toole E. H., 1946, JOUR AGRIC RES, V72, P201
   Weber E, 1998, AM J BOT, V85, P1110, DOI 10.2307/2446344
   WILLEMSEN RW, 1975, AM J BOT, V62, P1, DOI 10.2307/2442073
   Xia HB, 2011, NEW PHYTOL, V191, P1119, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03766.x
NR 66
TC 62
Z9 68
U1 1
U2 106
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 0029-8549
EI 1432-1939
J9 OECOLOGIA
JI Oecologia
PD MAR
PY 2014
VL 174
IS 3
BP 739
EP 750
DI 10.1007/s00442-013-2813-6
PG 12
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA AB7WS
UT WOS:000332002300013
PM 24197990
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Tan, PL
   Baldwin, C
   White, I
   Burry, K
AF Tan, Poh-Ling
   Baldwin, C.
   White, I.
   Burry, K.
TI Water planning in the Condamine Alluvium, Queensland: Sharing
   information and eliciting views in a context of overallocation
SO JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Water allocation; Groundwater; Sustainable yield; Conflict; Indigenous
   engagement; Intergenerational equity
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; AUSTRALIA
AB The Central Condamine Alluvium, at the head of Australia's Murray-Darling River system, provides groundwater for food, fibre and a fast expanding urban population. Current extraction is assessed at 67 GL/a (gigalitres per annum), while the best available scientific data estimates the sustainable groundwater system yield is closer to 40 GL/a (CSIRO, 2008). Peak organisations accept overallocation as a critical issue but conflict over water has disrupted several past attempts at regulation. To assist local communities and the planning agency, seven planning tools were used: (1) an extended stakeholder analysis and context report, (2) a program of engagement with Traditional Custodians, (3) intergenerational workshops, (4) a survey of groundwater users covering issues in setting and meeting the agreed system yield, (5) a multi-criteria analysis relating to setting and apportioning the available yield, (6) a pilot workshop addressing adaptation to climate risk, and (7) development of a three-dimensional groundwater visualisation tool relating to the regional aquifers. Results fed directly into pre-planning processes undertaken by the State water agency. The tools allowed a much broader range of voices, values and depth of information to feed into the planning process than otherwise available. Participants found the Indigenous engagement tool and the GVT the most useful. The latter addressed identified information gaps and allowed for aquifer characteristics and the interaction with bores to be presented in a user-friendly manner. Intergenerational perspectives about using water within sustainable limits were also obtained but the Community Reference Panel did not place any weight on this perspective in discussions over the plan amendment. Evaluations of the tools demonstrate that a range of planning tools can be readily used to enhance existing planning processes, particularly by sharing information and eliciting views that may not be readily accessible to water planners. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Tan, Poh-Ling] Griffith Univ, Griffith Law Sch, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.
   [Baldwin, C.] Univ Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Qld 4558, Australia.
   [White, I.; Burry, K.] Griffith Univ, Sociolegal Res Ctr, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.
C3 Griffith University; University of the Sunshine Coast; Griffith
   University
RP Tan, PL (corresponding author), Griffith Univ, Griffith Law Sch, Kessels Rd, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.
EM p.tan@griffith.edu.au
RI Baldwin, Claudia/G-6889-2019
OI Baldwin, Claudia/0000-0002-0707-6564
FU National Water Commission through its Raising National Water Standards
   Program; Queensland Government Department of Environment and Resource
   Management (DERM)
FX The Water Planning Tools Project (2008-2010) was funded by the National
   Water Commission through its Raising National Water Standards Program
   which supports the implementation of the National Water Initiative. Many
   Indigenous groups, community members, stakeholders and water planners
   participated in the research and we thank them for their patience,
   ideas, and generous contribution of their time. We thank Dr Malcolm Cox,
   Allan James and Amy Hawke of Queensland University of Technology for
   development and presentation of the visualisation tool. We acknowledge
   support from the Queensland Government Department of Environment and
   Resource Management (DERM) for access to the groundwater database and
   funding towads the visualisation tool.
CR Ammundsen C., 2010, CSG WATER UPDATE AME
   [Anonymous], MAN GROUNDW COND RIV
   [Anonymous], MANAGEMENT GROUNDWAT
   [Anonymous], BEST PRACT MAN WAT C
   [Anonymous], 2008, THESIS U QUEENSLAND
   [Anonymous], LANDHOLDER PRACTICES
   Australian Natural Resources Atlas, 2009, WAT APP 2 GROUNDW AV
   Baldwin C, 2009, AUSTRALAS J ENV MAN, V16, P70
   Cobon DH, 2009, RANGELAND J, V31, P31, DOI 10.1071/RJ08069
   CSIRO, 2008, WAT AV COND BAL REP
   Cullen P., 2003, REV SCI UNDERPINNING
   Department of Environment and Resource Management, 2009, COND BAL WAT RES PLA
   Department of Natural Resource Management, 2005, HYDR FRAM REP GREAT
   Evans R., 2007, IMPACT GROUNDWATER U
   Free D., 1995, P MURR DARL 1995 WOR
   George D., 2009, WATER, V36, P73
   Godden L, 2008, TROUBLED WATERS: CONFRONTING THE WATER CRISIS IN AUSTRALIAS CITIES, P157
   Grant R., 2004, EPLJ, V21, P144
   Jackson J., 2012, J HYDROL, DOI [10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.12.015, DOI 10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2011.12.015]
   James A.R., 2009, CONDAMINE VALLEY 3D
   Kelly B., 2007, 20069D NCGM U TECHN
   Mooney C, 2012, J HYDROL, V474, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.040
   Mooney C, 2012, J HYDROL, V474, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.010
   Murray-Darling Basin Authority, 2010, GUID PROP BAS PLAN O
   Queensland Government, 2006, QUEENSL NAT WAT IN S
   Sinclair Knight Mertz, 2010, 29 SINCL KNIGHT MERT
   Stokes C, 2010, ADAPTING AGRICULTURE TO CLIMATE CHANGE: PREPARING AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES FOR THE FUTURE, P1
   Tan P.-L., 2010, WATERLINES SERIES NA
   Tan P-L, 2000, ENV PLANNING LAW J, V17, P545
   Tan Poh-Ling, 2009, NATL INDIGENOUS WATE
   United Nations General Assembly, 1992, UN C ENV DV RIO DE J
   Weber EU, 2010, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V1, P332, DOI 10.1002/wcc.41
   White I., 2010, IMPACTS GROUNDWATER
NR 33
TC 15
Z9 15
U1 1
U2 17
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
PI AMSTERDAM
PA PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0022-1694
J9 J HYDROL
JI J. Hydrol.
PD DEC 12
PY 2012
VL 474
SI SI
BP 38
EP 46
DI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.004
PG 9
WC Engineering, Civil; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Geology; Water Resources
GA 056FX
UT WOS:000312474900006
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wszola, L
   Sievert, NA
   Lynch, AJ
   Embke, HS
   Kaz, AL
   Robertson, MD
   Midway, SR
   Paukert, CP
AF Wszola, Lyndsie
   Sievert, Nicholas A.
   Lynch, Abigail J.
   Embke, Holly S.
   Kaz, Anna L.
   Robertson, Matthew D.
   Midway, Stephen R.
   Paukert, Craig P.
TI Lake temperature and morphometry shape the thermal composition of
   recreational fishing catch
SO TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE fisheries; human dimensions; lake and reservoir; survey methods
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACTS; FRESH-WATER FISH; OXYTHERMAL HABITAT; POTENTIAL
   CHANGES; LARGEMOUTH BASS; ASIAN CARP; MANAGEMENT; FISHERIES;
   COMMUNITIES; CONSUMPTION
AB Objective: Managing freshwater fisheries in warming lakes is challenging because climate change impacts anglers, fish, and their interactions. Methods: We integrated recent models of current and future lake temperatures with recreational fisheries catch data from 587 lakes in three north-central U.S. states (Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) to evaluate how the thermal composition of recreational fisheries catch varied as a function of temperature, ice coverage, and lake morphometry. Result: We found that warmwater catch share (WCS), defined as the proportion of fish in recreational angling catch that belonged to the warmwater thermal guild (final temperature preferendum [FTP] > 25 degrees C), increased with average annual lake surface temperature and decreased with survey ice coverage. However, we also found that WCS decreased with increased lake area and depth. Using mid-century (2040-2060) water temperature and ice projections while holding all other variables constant, we predicted that WCS will likely increase as the climate warms but that significant thermal heterogeneity will persist. Conclusion: Lakes that are large (>100 ha) and deep (>10 m) and those with cooler (<3700 annual growing degree-days) predicted future temperatures will likely hold thermal refugia for coolwater (FTP = 19-25 degrees C) and coldwater (FTP < 19 degrees C) fish even as average lake temperatures rise, creating the potential for management actions to resist the shift from coolwater to warmwater fisheries. Managers of smaller and more rapidly warming lakes may want to consider strategies that accept or direct emerging warmwater fishing opportunities. We suggest that the most viable path to climate adaptation in landscapes of diverse lakes may be to resist warmwater shifts where possible and to accept or direct the rise of warmwater fishing opportunities where necessary.
C1 [Wszola, Lyndsie] Univ Missouri, Sch Nat Resources, Missouri Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
   [Sievert, Nicholas A.] US Geol Survey, Oak Ridge Inst Sci & Educ, Oak Ridge, TN USA.
   [Lynch, Abigail J.] US Geol Survey, Natl Climate Adaptat Sci Ctr, Reston, VA USA.
   [Embke, Holly S.] US Geol Survey, Midwest Climate Adaptat Sci Ctr, Reston, VA USA.
   [Kaz, Anna L.; Midway, Stephen R.] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Oceanog & Coastal Sci, Baton Rouge, LA USA.
   [Robertson, Matthew D.] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Ctr Fisheries Ecosyst Res, Fisheries & Marine Inst, St John, NF, Canada.
   [Paukert, Craig P.] Univ Missouri, Sch Nat Resources, Missouri Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, US Geol Survey, Columbia, MO USA.
C3 University of Missouri System; University of Missouri Columbia; Oak
   Ridge Associated Universities; United States Department of Energy (DOE);
   Oak Ridge Institute for Science & Education; United States Department of
   the Interior; United States Geological Survey; United States Department
   of the Interior; United States Geological Survey; United States
   Department of the Interior; United States Geological Survey; Louisiana
   State University System; Louisiana State University; Memorial University
   Newfoundland; United States Department of the Interior; United States
   Geological Survey; University of Missouri System; University of Missouri
   Columbia
RP Wszola, L (corresponding author), Univ Missouri, Sch Nat Resources, Missouri Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
EM lswpp5@umsystem.edu
RI Lynch, Abigail/H-5059-2019
OI Lynch, Abigail J./0000-0001-8449-8392; Embke, Holly/0000-0002-9897-7068;
   Midway, Stephen/0000-0003-0162-1995; Paukert, Craig/0000-0002-9369-8545
FU USGS National Climate Adaptation Science Center; Missouri Department of
   Conservation, University of Missouri, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
   and Wildlife Management Institute
FX Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes
   only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. All data,
   metadata, and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality
   standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected.
   Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer
   system at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty, expressed or
   implied, is made regarding the display or utility of the data for other
   purposes, nor on all computer systems, nor shall the act of distribution
   constitute any such warranty. The USGS or the U.S. Government shall not
   be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described
   and/or contained herein. First and foremost, we thank the state and
   territorial natural resources agencies that contributed data to
   CreelCat. Funding for this project was provided by the USGS National
   Climate Adaptation Science Center. The Missouri Cooperative Fish and
   Wildlife Research Unit is jointly supported by a cooperative agreement
   among the USGS, Missouri Department of Conservation, University of
   Missouri, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Wildlife Management
   Institute. We thank D. Smith for his insightful feedback on this
   manuscript and its accompanying code. We furthermore thank two anonymous
   reviewers and the handling editor for their time and expertise, which
   have greatly improved the manuscript.
CR Arlinghaus R, 2020, J OUTDOOR REC TOUR, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.jort.2019.03.006
   Arlinghaus R, 2017, REV FISH SCI AQUAC, V25, P1, DOI 10.1080/23308249.2016.1209160
   Arlinghaus R, 2016, FISHERIES MANAG ECOL, V23, P177, DOI 10.1111/fme.12191
   Azza N, 2007, J TROP ECOL, V23, P353, DOI 10.1017/S0266467407004117
   Baddeley A, 2016, CHAP HALL CRC INTERD, P1
   Beck HE, 2023, SCI DATA, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41597-023-02549-6
   BEITINGER TL, 1979, AM ZOOL, V19, P319
   Benoit DM, 2023, DIVERS DISTRIB, V29, P289, DOI 10.1111/ddi.13661
   Bolker BM, 2009, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V24, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
   Bozek MA, 2011, BIOLOGY, MANAGEMENT, AND CULTURE OF WALLEYE AND SAUGER, P133
   Bozek MA, 2011, BIOLOGY, MANAGEMENT, AND CULTURE OF WALLEYE AND SAUGER, P233
   Brooks SP, 1998, J COMPUT GRAPH STAT, V7, P434, DOI 10.2307/1390675
   Buto SusanG., 2020, NHDPlus High Resolution (NHDPlus HR)-A hydrography framework for the Nation, DOI [10.3133/fs20203033, DOI 10.3133/FS20203033]
   Campana SE, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P428, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0744-x
   Carruthers TR, 2019, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V76, P970, DOI 10.1139/cjfas-2018-0168
   Chizinski CJ, 2014, FISH RES, V154, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2014.02.013
   Cline TJ, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0062279
   Coker G. A., 2001, MORPHOLOGICAL ECOLOG, V2554
   Comte L, 2013, FRESHWATER BIOL, V58, P625, DOI 10.1111/fwb.12081
   Cooke SJ, 2018, FISH FISH, V19, P201, DOI 10.1111/faf.12246
   Cowx IG, 2023, FISHERIES MANAG ECOL, V30, P555, DOI 10.1111/fme.12656
   Dassow CJ, 2022, FISHERIES MANAG ECOL, V29, P378, DOI 10.1111/fme.12548
   Daufresne M, 2007, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V13, P2467, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01449.x
   de Valpine P, 2017, J COMPUT GRAPH STAT, V26, P403, DOI 10.1080/10618600.2016.1172487
   Dundas SJ, 2020, J ASSOC ENVIRON RESO, V7, P209, DOI 10.1086/706343
   Ellerby DJ, 2011, EVOL BIOL, V38, P422, DOI 10.1007/s11692-011-9130-y
   Embke HS, 2020, FISHERIES, V45, P647, DOI 10.1002/fsh.10486
   Erickson KA, 2021, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V27, P2520, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15568
   Feiner ZS, 2020, FISH RES, V230, DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105679
   Fernandes T, 2019, ECOGRAPHY, V42, P2037, DOI 10.1111/ecog.04386
   govinfo, 2024, FEDERAL STATE RELATI
   Graeb BDS, 2005, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V62, P2010, DOI 10.1139/F05-112
   Guzzo MM, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P9912, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1702584114
   Hansen GJA, 2022, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V42, P484, DOI 10.1002/nafm.10741
   Hansen GJA, 2018, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V75, P106, DOI 10.1139/cjfas-2016-0249
   Hayden B, 2014, ECOLOGY, V95, P538, DOI 10.1890/13-0264.1
   Heermann L, 2013, FISHERIES MANAG ECOL, V20, P187, DOI 10.1111/fme.12000
   Herb WR, 2014, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V71, P1334, DOI 10.1139/cjfas-2013-0535
   Homer C, 2020, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V162, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.02.019
   Hunt LM, 2019, REV FISH SCI AQUAC, V27, P261, DOI 10.1080/23308249.2019.1583166
   Hunt LM, 2016, FISHERIES, V41, P362, DOI 10.1080/03632415.2016.1187015
   Hutchinson G E., 1957, John Wiley Sons
   Jacobson PC, 2013, ADV LIMNOL, V64, P323, DOI 10.1127/1612-166X/2013/0064-0005
   Jacobson PC, 2010, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V67, P2002, DOI 10.1139/F10-115
   Jin SM, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11242971
   Jones C. M., 2013, FISHERIES TECHNIQUES, DOI [10.47886/9781934874295.ch19, DOI 10.47886/9781934874295.CH19]
   Junker J, 2015, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V751, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10750-014-2073-4
   Kaemingk MA, 2020, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V77, P194, DOI 10.1139/cjfas-2019-0119
   Keevin TM, 2019, J APPL ICHTHYOL, V35, P1141, DOI 10.1111/jai.13951
   Lawrence MJ, 2022, T AM FISH SOC, V151, P322, DOI 10.1002/tafs.10349
   Lawson ZJ, 2011, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V31, P666, DOI 10.1080/02755947.2011.608990
   Lueck D, 2022, LAND ECON, V98, P461, DOI 10.3368/le.98.3.082721-0100
   Lynch A. J., 2022, ENCY INLAND WATERS, P475
   Lynch AJ, 2021, FISHERIES, V46, P574, DOI 10.1002/fsh.10671
   Lynch AJ, 2021, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V19, P461, DOI 10.1002/fee.2377
   Lyons J, 2017, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V37, P550, DOI 10.1080/02755947.2017.1296514
   Maberly SC, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-15108-z
   Magee MR, 2019, ENVIRON MANAGE, V63, P396, DOI 10.1007/s00267-018-01134-7
   MAGNUSON JJ, 1990, T AM FISH SOC, V119, P254, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1990)119<0254:PCITTH>2.3.CO;2
   Mainka SA, 2010, INTEGR ZOOL, V5, P102, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2010.00193.x
   Mee JA, 2016, ECOL APPL, V26, P1693, DOI 10.1890/15-0879.1
   Michigan Department of Natural Resources, 2023, MICHIGAN FISHING GUI
   Midway SR, 2016, FISHERIES, V41, P536, DOI 10.1080/03632415.2016.1208090
   Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 2018, LAKE SURVEY REPORT R
   Mohseni O, 2003, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V59, P389, DOI 10.1023/A:1024847723344
   Morgan M, 2018, HUM DIMENS WILDL, V23, P491, DOI 10.1080/10871209.2018.1485990
   Nieman CL, 2021, REV FISH SCI AQUAC, V29, P739, DOI 10.1080/23308249.2020.1869696
   Nyboer EA, 2022, FISH FISH, V23, P1282, DOI 10.1111/faf.12688
   Ojea E, 2020, ONE EARTH, V2, P544, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.05.012
   Paukert C, 2021, FISHERIES, V46, P449, DOI 10.1002/fsh.10668
   Pedersen C., 2020, FISHERIES MANAGEMENT
   Plumb JM, 2014, OECOLOGIA, V175, P549, DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-2934-6
   Pollock K.H., 1994, ANGLER SURVEY METHOD
   Pope KL, 2016, FISH RES, V183, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.05.025
   QGIS.org, 2023, QGIS geographic information system
   Raabe JK, 2012, T AM FISH SOC, V141, P1097, DOI 10.1080/00028487.2012.679017
   Rypel AL, 2018, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V75, P2291, DOI 10.1139/cjfas-2017-0311
   Rypel AL, 2016, FISHERIES, V41, P230, DOI 10.1080/03632415.2016.1160894
   Sass GG, 2023, FISH RES, V263, DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2023.106678
   Schuurman GW, 2022, BIOSCIENCE, V72, P16, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biab067
   Sharma S, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0241222
   Shuter BJ, 2012, AQUAT SCI, V74, P637, DOI 10.1007/s00027-012-0274-3
   Siepker MJ, 2013, T AM FISH SOC, V142, P119, DOI 10.1080/00028487.2012.722169
   Sievert NA, 2023, SCI DATA, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41597-023-02523-2
   Thompson LM, 2021, FISHERIES, V46, P8, DOI 10.1002/fsh.10506
   Tingley RW, 2019, LAKE RESERV MANAGE, V35, P435, DOI 10.1080/10402381.2019.1678535
   Tingley RW, 2019, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V39, P676, DOI 10.1002/nafm.10301
   U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2023, 2022 NATL SURVEY FIS
   Van Assche K, 2014, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V57, P1122, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2013.787054
   Van Assche K, 2013, LAND USE POLICY, V34, P233, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.03.009
   Varble S, 2013, APPETITE, V65, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2013.01.022
   Venturelli PA, 2010, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V67, P1057, DOI 10.1139/F10-041
   Ward NK, 2023, ECOL PROCESS, V12, DOI 10.1186/s13717-023-00460-x
   Whitney JE, 2016, FISHERIES, V41, P332, DOI 10.1080/03632415.2016.1186656
   Wolf D, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V199, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.031
   Woodward G, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P2093, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0055
   Woolway RI, 2020, INLAND WATERS, V10, P322, DOI 10.1080/20442041.2020.1712180
   Wu TM, 2023, DIVERS DISTRIB, V29, P300, DOI 10.1111/ddi.13664
   Young N, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.002
NR 99
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0002-8487
EI 1548-8659
J9 T AM FISH SOC
JI Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.
PD NOV
PY 2024
VL 153
IS 6
BP 746
EP 762
DI 10.1002/tafs.10481
EA OCT 2024
PG 17
WC Fisheries
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Fisheries
GA Q6S9K
UT WOS:001337029300001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Yang, MS
   Li, Y
   Du, YA
   Wang, YF
   Fei, WY
   Huang, JX
   Liang, JQ
AF Yang, Mengsheng
   Li, Yuan
   Du, Yanan
   Wang, Yingfeng
   Fei, Wenyi
   Huang, Jingxiong
   Liang, Jiaqi
TI What is the outdoor thermal comfort (OTC) threshold in Gulangyu, China:
   An empirical study
SO URBAN CLIMATE
LA English
DT Article
DE Outdoor thermal comfort; Heritage destinations; Gulangyu; Universal
   thermal climate index; Threshold; Influence
ID URBAN HEAT-ISLAND; HISTORIC SITE; CLIMATE; ENVIRONMENTS; ADAPTATION;
   TOURISM; SPACE; HOT; BEHAVIOR; HERITAGE
AB Empirical outdoor thermal comfort (OTC) research combining subjective questionnaires and objective measurements is emerging in different climate classifications around the globe, with the increasing climate change. The empirical OTC research in heritage destinations has become an indispensable basic work due to the demand difference with urban residential space and the constraints of the OTC measurement scale. Taking Gulangyu, a world heritage destination, as a case study, this paper establishes an OTC benchmark research framework (OTC-BERK-GLY) based on references to previous empirical research and outdoor thermal benchmarks, and reveals a multitude of OTC thresholds for different groups of people through the mathematical-statistical analyses of questionnaire data and Universal Thermal Climatic Index (UTCI). The results show: for foreign tourists, local tourists and islanders, 1) the maximum acceptable temperatures were 29.4 degrees C, 29.4 degrees C and 30.2 degrees C of UTCI, respectively, 2) the neutral temperature ranges were 14.0-25.6 degrees C, 14.1-26.8 degrees C and 15.1-28.3 degrees C, respectively, and 3) the preferred temperatures were 22.6 degrees C, 22.4 degrees C and 21.0 degrees C, respectively. This study also analyzed the main influences on OTC in Gulangyu using Discrete Choice Modeling (DCM), which shows that the physical environment was the main influence affecting the thermal sensation (TSV) of the respondents. And wind environment (va), sky view factor (SVF), age, time of exposure, group errands, and the use of parasols and sun-protective clothing had different levels of influence on thermal comfort (TCV). This study is intended to provide support for the development of climate adaptive tourism management in Gulangyu, and to provide a case study for similar heritage destinations.
C1 [Yang, Mengsheng; Li, Yuan; Du, Yanan; Wang, Yingfeng; Fei, Wenyi; Liang, Jiaqi] Xiamen Univ, Sch Architecture & Civil Engn, Xiamen, Peoples R China.
   [Yang, Mengsheng; Li, Yuan; Du, Yanan; Wang, Yingfeng; Fei, Wenyi; Liang, Jiaqi] Xiamen Key Lab Integrated Applicat Intelligent Tec, Xiamen, Peoples R China.
   [Huang, Jingxiong] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Architecture, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Yuan] Xiamen Univ, Gulangyu Res Ctr, Fujian Prov Social Sci Res Base, Xiamen, Peoples R China.
C3 Xiamen University; Tsinghua University; Xiamen University
RP Li, Y (corresponding author), Xiamen Univ, Sch Architecture & Civil Engn, Xiamen, Peoples R China.
EM liyuan79@xmu.edu.cn
RI Li, Yuan/V-4523-2017; Huang, Jingxiong/KFQ-0459-2024
OI Huang, Jingxiong/0000-0002-2168-7978; Yang,
   Mengsheng/0000-0003-1431-6607
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [42171219]; Natural Science
   Foundation of Fujian Province [2020 J01011]; Major Project Funding for
   Social Science Research Base in Fujian Province Social Science Planning
FX This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (grant number 42171219) , the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian
   Province (grant number 2020 J01011) and the Major Project Funding for
   Social Science Research Base in Fujian Province Social Science Planning.
CR Abdi H., 2010, Encycl. Res. Des, V1, P1
   Abdollahzadeh N, 2021, FRONT ARCHIT RES, V10, P394, DOI 10.1016/j.foar.2020.11.006
   Aghamolaei R, 2023, ENERG ENVIRON-UK, V34, P2204, DOI 10.1177/0958305X221116176
   Ahmed KS, 2003, ENERG BUILDINGS, V35, P103, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00085-3
   [Anonymous], 1998, ISO 7726 ERGONOMICS, DOI DOI 10.1111/INA.12748
   Antonini E, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10.3390/en13082079
   Aram F, 2020, ENVIRON SCI EUR, V32, DOI 10.1186/s12302-020-00393-8
   Ashrae S.M., 1992, ANSI/ASHRAE, V55, P5
   Baruti MM, 2019, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V63, P1449, DOI 10.1007/s00484-019-01757-3
   Blazejczyk K, 2013, GEOGR POL, V86, P5, DOI 10.7163/GPol.2013.1
   Bröde P, 2012, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V56, P471, DOI 10.1007/s00484-011-0452-3
   Budd GM, 2008, J SCI MED SPORT, V11, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.07.003
   Carter B., 1997, International Journal of Heritage Studies, V3, P45
   Chen K, 2023, BUILD ENVIRON, V228, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109919
   Chen L, 2012, CITIES, V29, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2011.08.006
   Cheung PK, 2018, ENERG BUILDINGS, V173, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.029
   Cheung PK, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V123, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.008
   Deevi B, 2020, URBAN CLIM, V34, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100718
   Farhadi H, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101448
   Ghaffour W, 2021, SMART SUSTAIN BUILT, V10, P141, DOI 10.1108/SASBE-12-2019-0166
   Gu H, 2022, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/atmos13122016
   He XD, 2015, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V59, P285, DOI 10.1007/s00484-014-0841-5
   He XY, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V172, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106739
   HENSHER DA, 1994, TRANSPORTATION, V21, P107, DOI 10.1007/BF01098788
   Höppe P, 1999, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V43, P71, DOI 10.1007/s004840050118
   Höppe P, 2002, ENERG BUILDINGS, V34, P661, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00017-8
   Huang BZ, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V787, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147603
   Huang JX, 2016, BUILD ENVIRON, V103, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.03.029
   Huang JX, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12010129
   Indraganti M, 2010, ENERG BUILDINGS, V42, P1019, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.01.014
   ISO, 2019, Ergonomics of the Physical Environment-Subjective Judgement Scales for Assessing Physical Environments, P5
   Jendritzky G, 2012, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V56, P421, DOI 10.1007/s00484-011-0513-7
   Jia C, 2023, BUILD ENVIRON, V241, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110510
   Jiao Y, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V118, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.03.038
   Jie Z., 2021, Rev. Int. Geograph. Educat. Online, V11, P77
   Jin H, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106488
   Konstantakis M, 2020, BIG DATA COGN COMPUT, V4, DOI 10.3390/bdcc4020012
   Kumar P, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102297
   Lane R, 2008, GEOFORUM, V39, P1308, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.08.002
   Lau KKL, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V154, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.005
   LaValley MP, 2008, CIRCULATION, V117, P2395, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.682658
   Lenzholzer S, 2020, URBAN CLIM, V34, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100705
   Li JW, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V170, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106614
   Li M, 2008, TOURISM MANAGE, V29, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.03.013
   Li Y, 2023, BUILD ENVIRON, V242, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110568
   Li Y, 2017, URBAN DES INT, V22, P127, DOI 10.1057/s41289-016-0010-z
   Li Y, 2016, TOURISM MANAGE, V52, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2015.06.008
   Lin TP, 2008, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V52, P281, DOI 10.1007/s00484-007-0122-7
   Lin TP, 2013, BUILD ENVIRON, V59, P599, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.10.005
   Lin TP, 2010, BUILD ENVIRON, V45, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.06.002
   Liu CX, 2017, TRANSPORT REV, V37, P715, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2017.1293188
   Liu YC, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V206, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108355
   Ma X, 2019, TOURISM MANAGE, V75, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.05.005
   Malcoti MD, 2023, J CLIM CHANG, V9, P39, DOI 10.3233/JCC230005
   Matzarakis A, 2007, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V51, P323, DOI 10.1007/s00484-009-0261-0
   Meili N, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V195, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107733
   Mi JY, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V169, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106592
   Mushore TD, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15235461
   Nasrollahi N, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V125, P356, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.09.006
   Nasser N, 2003, J PLAN LIT, V17, P467, DOI 10.1177/0885412203017004001
   Nikolopoulou M, 2003, ENERG BUILDINGS, V35, P95, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00084-1
   Nikolopoulou M, 2006, BUILD ENVIRON, V41, P1455, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.05.031
   Pantavou K, 2013, BUILD ENVIRON, V66, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.02.014
   Peel MC, 2007, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V11, P1633, DOI 10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007
   Rajagopalan P, 2014, SOL ENERGY, V107, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2014.05.042
   Ren XY, 2023, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/atmos14061010
   Rutty M, 2015, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V59, P37, DOI 10.1007/s00484-014-0820-x
   Salata F, 2017, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V61, P2229, DOI 10.1007/s00484-017-1430-1
   Salata F, 2016, BUILD ENVIRON, V96, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.11.023
   Savic S, 2022, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V150, P1425, DOI 10.1007/s00704-022-04237-8
   Shooshtarian S, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V177, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106917
   Shooshtarian S, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101495
   Shooshtarian S, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V123, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.002
   Shooshtarian S, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V26, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.005
   Soebarto V, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V155, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.032
   Song D, 2024, URBAN CLIM, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101949
   Spagnolo J, 2003, BUILD ENVIRON, V38, P721, DOI 10.1016/S0360-1323(02)00209-3
   Sun C, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V222, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109342
   Tabatabaei SS, 2023, BUILD ENVIRON, V243, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110701
   Nguyen THH, 2014, J HERIT TOUR, V9, P35, DOI 10.1080/1743873X.2013.818677
   Tian Y, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V808, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152079
   Tsitoura M, 2014, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V86, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.04.059
   Tung CH, 2014, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V58, P1927, DOI 10.1007/s00484-014-0795-7
   van Hoof J, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V120, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.05.008
   Vecellio DJ, 2021, ENVIRON RES, V201, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111583
   Vellei Marika, 2021, Temperature (Austin), V8, P320, DOI 10.1080/23328940.2021.1976004
   Villadiego K, 2014, BUILD ENVIRON, V75, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.01.017
   Wang C, 2022, ARAB J SCI ENG, V47, P5237, DOI 10.1007/s13369-021-06457-y
   Watanabe S, 2016, BUILD ENVIRON, V95, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.09.015
   Xi TY, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106757
   Xu M, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V43, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.034
   Yahia MW, 2018, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V62, P373, DOI 10.1007/s00484-017-1380-7
   Yahia MW, 2013, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V57, P615, DOI 10.1007/s00484-012-0589-8
   Yan S, 2018, HIST ENVIRON POLICY, V9, P376, DOI 10.1080/17567505.2018.1530495
   Yan TK, 2023, BUILD ENVIRON, V233, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110130
   Yang W, 2013, BUILD ENVIRON, V59, P426, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.008
   Yin S, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101350
   Yuan TT, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101501
   Zare S, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V26, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2018.08.001
   Zhang CJP, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16050876
NR 100
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 21
U2 21
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0955
J9 URBAN CLIM
JI Urban CLim.
PD JUL
PY 2024
VL 56
AR 102086
DI 10.1016/j.uclim.2024.102086
EA AUG 2024
PG 27
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA D0N7C
UT WOS:001293245100001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Suryawan, IWK
   Lee, CH
AF Suryawan, I. Wayan Koko
   Lee, Chun-Hung
TI Importance-performance dynamics and willingness to pay in coastal areas
   for climate-adaptive Marine Debris Management
SO REGIONAL STUDIES IN MARINE SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptive capacity; Marine debris; Coastal communities; Climate change;
   Willingness to pay
ID SOLID-WASTE MANAGEMENT; DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE; VALUATION; COMMUNITY
AB This study focused on evaluating the adaptive capacity of coastal communities to manage marine debris, a critical issue intensified by the effects of human-induced climate change on the Earth 's oceans. The detrimental impacts of climate change, including rising sea levels, ocean acidification, and changes in ocean currents and temperatures, pose significant threats to marine ecosystems and human societies. The study specifically investigated the factors influencing the willingness to pay (WTP) for adaptive Marine Debris Management (MDM) services. It involved diverse community groups, including passive observers, compliant followers, and ecochampions, each exhibiting unique approaches and capacities for managing marine debris. The research revealed that while passive observers and compliant followers favor asset-based programs, eco-champions are more inclined towards enhancing environmental awareness and enforcing policies. A critical methodological aspect of the study was the quantification of WTP, set at IDR 10,000 /month/household, to assess the communities ' financial commitment to MDM. The study found that WTP is influenced by factors such as awareness of environmental issues, behavioral responses to regulations, beach clean-up participation, environmental education, and recycling training. Of these, income emerged as the most impactful factor on WTP, followed by education level, age, place of residence, and eco-champion classification. Furthermore, the provision of adaptive MDM services positively influenced community WTP. These findings highlight the need for MDM policymakers to develop customized strategies that address different community groups ' distinct needs and priorities. The study recommends that such strategies focus on improving understanding and responsiveness to environmental regulations and providing specialized educational programs. By adopting this approach, not only can the immediate challenge of marine debris be tackled, but it can also lead to the establishment of a more sustainable and community-focused model of environmental stewardship.
C1 [Suryawan, I. Wayan Koko] Univ Pertamina, Fac Infrastruct Planning, Dept Environm Engn, Jalan Sinabung II, Jakarta 12220, Indonesia.
   [Suryawan, I. Wayan Koko; Lee, Chun-Hung] Natl Dong Hwa Univ, Coll Environm Studies & Oceanog, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Studies, Hualien 97401, Taiwan.
C3 National Dong Hwa University
RP Lee, CH (corresponding author), Natl Dong Hwa Univ, Coll Environm Studies & Oceanog, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Studies, Hualien 97401, Taiwan.
EM chlee@gms.ndhu.edu.tw
CR Abiddin NZ, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14084386
   Ahmad-Kamil EI, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14074308
   Ananno AA, 2021, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V27, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.022
   [Anonymous], Peraturan Presiden (Perpres) Perpres Nomor 83 Tahun 2018 tentang Penanganan Sampah Laut
   Anwar N, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120401
   Ardakani AF, 2017, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V14, P1409, DOI 10.1007/s13762-017-1246-x
   Assoratgoon W, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V400, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136666
   Battisti C, 2020, ENVIRONMENTS, V7, DOI 10.3390/environments7100087
   Bellou N, 2021, NAT SUSTAIN, V4, P516, DOI 10.1038/s41893-021-00726-2
   Bianco G. B., 2020, International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, V5, P1, DOI [10.1186/s40991-020-00048-0, DOI 10.1186/S40991-020-00048-0]
   Blomsma F, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V156, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104698
   Boakes Z, 2022, J NAT CONSERV, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126190
   Booth H, 2022, ECOL ECON, V201, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107578
   Bostan Y, 2020, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V17, P4031, DOI 10.1007/s13762-020-02714-z
   Brotosusilo A, 2020, GLOB J ENVIRON SCI M, V6, P341, DOI [10.22034/gjesm.2020.03.05, 10.22034/GJESM.2020.03.05]
   Cinner JE, 2019, ONE EARTH, V1, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2019.08.003
   da Costa JP, 2020, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V8, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2020.00104
   Das AK, 2022, INNOV INFRASTRUCT SO, V7, DOI 10.1007/s41062-022-00776-1
   Das M, 2022, ECOSYST SERV, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101431
   De Luca C, 2021, ECOL SOC, V26, DOI 10.5751/ES-12535-260438
   Ferreira JC, 2021, J MAR SCI ENG, V9, DOI 10.3390/jmse9030306
   Fossi MC, 2020, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V184, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105005
   Frantzi S, 2021, MAR POLLUT BULL, V170, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112611
   French E, 2021, NAT PLANTS, V7, P256, DOI 10.1038/s41477-020-00830-9
   Garcés-Ordóñez O, 2020, MAR POLLUT BULL, V160, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111558
   Giebels D, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V47, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.015
   Green KM, 2021, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V164, DOI 10.1007/s10584-021-02965-w
   Hahladakis JN, 2020, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V192, DOI 10.1007/s10661-020-8202-9
   Hartley JM, 2021, MAR POLLUT BULL, V170, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112648
   Hervani AA, 2022, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V30, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.026
   Hua JY, 2019, CITIES, V94, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.014
   Hung LY, 2022, MAR POLICY, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104849
   Jang S, 2023, ENVIRON INT, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2023.107959
   Kandziora JH, 2019, MAR POLLUT BULL, V141, P657, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.01.034
   Karmarkar OD, 2023, CASE STUD TRANSP POL, V12, DOI 10.1016/j.cstp.2023.100974
   Kassahun HT, 2020, ECOL ECON, V177, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106771
   Kostianaia EA, 2021, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/hydrology8030133
   Koumoutsea A, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su152316441
   Laajimi R, 2024, REV DEV ECON, V28, P803, DOI 10.1111/rode.13083
   Lange GM, 2009, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V52, P521, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2009.08.005
   Li Z, 2020, TRANSP LETT, V12, P166, DOI 10.1080/19427867.2018.1546806
   Lin PSS, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101339
   Lincoln S, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V837, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155709
   LOOMIS JB, 1988, J LEISURE RES, V20, P46, DOI 10.1080/00222216.1988.11969756
   Ruiz LAL, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119238
   Lucrezi S, 2020, MAR POLLUT BULL, V155, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111167
   Madricardo F, 2020, FRONT MAR SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2020.505134
   Maes T, 2019, MAR POLLUT BULL, V146, P274, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.06.019
   McCord Sarah E., 2022, Rangelands, V44, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.rala.2021.07.003
   McNicholas G, 2019, ECOL ECON, V163, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.022
   Mir I.S., 2021, Environmental Challenges, V2, DOI [10.1016/j.envc.2021.100023, DOI 10.1016/J.ENVC.2021.100023]
   Mironenko O., 2022, Education Against Plastic Pollution: Current Approaches and Best Practices BT - Plastics in the Aquatic Environment - Part II: Stakeholders' Role Against Pollution, P67
   Monsurat S., 2019, Res J. Appl. Sci., V1
   Nainggolan D, 2019, ECOL ECON, V166, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106402
   Nguyen KT, 2021, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V78, P615, DOI 10.1007/s10640-021-00546-0
   Ojala M, 2021, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V46, P35, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-022716
   Owen G, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102071
   Palanca-Tan R, 2023, SUSTAIN SCI, DOI 10.1007/s11625-023-01403-3
   Pan XF, 2020, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2020.101939
   Pelletier MC, 2020, AQUAT SCI, V82, DOI 10.1007/s00027-020-00717-z
   Perea-Moreno MA, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030863
   Perni A, 2021, ECOL ECON, V189, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107144
   Phan TTT, 2023, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V11, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1243084
   Phan TTT, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V422, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138617
   Rangel-Buitrago N, 2020, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V188, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105133
   Rodríguez Y, 2020, MAR POLLUT BULL, V160, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111631
   Rubilar-Torrealba R., 2022, Sustainability, V14
   Scrich VM, 2024, MAR POLLUT BULL, V198, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115799
   Seno R, 2022, ASIAN REV ACCOUNT, V30, P77, DOI 10.1108/ARA-10-2020-0153
   Shahzad T, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P52635, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-18177-9
   Shao QL, 2020, MAR POLICY, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104110
   Sheridan H, 2020, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V187, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105119
   Shi YJ, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
   Soares J, 2021, J HAZARD MATER, V412, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125227
   Stoll T., 2022, Handb. Micro Environ., P1129, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-39041-926, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-39041-926]
   Sundram S.D., 2022, Int J. Acad. Res Bus. Soc. Sci., V12, P110, DOI [10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i2/11536, DOI 10.6007/IJARBSS/V12-I2/11536]
   Suprapto P.A., 2019, Int Conf. Appl. Sci. Technol., V354, P398, DOI [10.2991/icastss-19.2019.85, DOI 10.2991/ICASTSS-19.2019.85]
   Suryawan IWK, 2024, ECOL INDIC, V165, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112191
   Suryawan IWK, 2024, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V253, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107149
   Suryawan IWK, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V157, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111226
   Suryawan IWK, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104765
   Sutrisno A.D., 2023, Anal. Case Study Indones. Land, V12
   Torres HR, 2019, ENVIRON EDUC RES, V25, P1400, DOI 10.1080/13504622.2019.1633274
   Tseng ML, 2011, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V172, P171, DOI 10.1007/s10661-010-1325-7
   Ulhasanah N, 2018, J MATER CYCLES WASTE, V20, P1257, DOI 10.1007/s10163-017-0691-4
   Utama I.G.B.R., 2020, SSRN Electron J, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3671267, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3671267]
   Veronica E.M., 2019, Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol, V13, P354, DOI [10.5897/ajest2019.2681, DOI 10.5897/AJEST2019.2681, 10.5897/AJEST2019.2681]
   Viti M, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V841, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156636
   Vlachogianni T, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V711, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135058
   Voolstra CR, 2021, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V2, P747, DOI 10.1038/s43017-021-00214-3
   Wang ZF, 2022, ECOSYST SERV, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101446
   Williams R, 2023, SOC SCI RES, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102802
   Wu HH, 2022, MAR POLICY, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103988
   Wynne AL, 2018, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V151, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.10.028
   Xu LX, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11020207
   Xu SJ, 2022, WETLANDS, V42, DOI 10.1007/s13157-022-01569-z
   Yang WJ, 2019, ENERG BUILDINGS, V184, P264, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.053
   Yilmaz F, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P40331, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-09109-0
   Zaman U, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15065213
NR 99
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 3
U2 3
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2352-4855
J9 REG STUD MAR SCI
JI Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci.
PD DEC 10
PY 2024
VL 77
AR 103596
DI 10.1016/j.rsma.2024.103596
EA JUN 2024
PG 12
WC Ecology; Marine & Freshwater Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Marine & Freshwater Biology
GA WN6U3
UT WOS:001255602800001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Hernaández-Dorta, A
   Jaizme-Vega, MD
   Ríos-Mesa, D
AF Hernandez-Dorta, Alexis
   Jaizme-Vega, Maria del Carmen
   Rios-Mesa, Domingo
TI Effect of Mycorrhizal Symbiosis on the Development of the Canary Island
   Tomato Variety "Manzana Negra" under Abiotic Stress Conditions
SO AGRICULTURE-BASEL
LA English
DT Article
DE mycorrhizae; mycorrhizal fungi; local variety; tomato; salt stress
ID VESICULAR-ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZA; BURLEY TOBACCO SEEDLINGS; SALT STRESS;
   NUTRIENT-UPTAKE; IMPROVED TOLERANCE; MAIZE PLANTS; FRUIT YIELD; GROWTH;
   FUNGI; SALINE
AB Tomato production in the Canary Islands has significantly decreased in recent years due to the presence of parasites and pathogens, poor-quality irrigation water, lack of infrastructure modernization, and increased competition. To address this issue, local varieties with better agro-climatic adaptation and organoleptic characteristics have been cultivated. These varieties show their maximum potential under an agro-ecological cultivation system, where the beneficial micro-organisms of the rhizosphere (in general) and mycorrhizal fungi (in particular) have a positive influence on their development, especially when the plants are subjected to biotic or abiotic stresses. Irrigation water in Canary Islands tomato cultivation comes from groundwater sources with moderate levels of sodium and chlorides or sodium and bicarbonates. This study evaluated the response of mycorrizal plants of the local tomato variety "Manzana Negra" under abiotic stress conditions due to the presence of chlorides and bicarbonates. Two tests were carried out with mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants. In the first one, 0, 75, and 150 mM NaCl solutions were applied. In the second, the nutrient solution was enriched with sodium bicarbonate at doses of 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, and 12.5 mM. Presence of native mycorrhizae improved the growth and nutrition of plants affected by irrigation with saline and alkaline water containing chloride and sodium carbonate. Symbiosis produced statistically significant increases in all plant-development-related variables (stem length and diameter; fresh and dry weight) in all bicarbonate concentrations. However, the results with the application of sodium chloride do not seem to indicate a positive interaction in most of the analytical parameters at 150 mM NaCl concentration. The mycorrhizal inoculation with local fungi can be interesting in the production of seedlings of this tomato variety in situations of moderate salinity, especially under bicarbonate stress conditions.
C1 [Hernandez-Dorta, Alexis; Jaizme-Vega, Maria del Carmen] Inst Canario Invest Agr, Plant Protect Dept, San Cristobal de La Lagun 38270, Tenerife, Spain.
   [Rios-Mesa, Domingo] Univ La Laguna, Agr & Rural Engn Dept, Ctra Geneto 2, San Cristobal la Laguna 38071, Tenerife, Spain.
   [Rios-Mesa, Domingo] Ctr Conservat Agr Biodivers Tenerife, Cabildo Insular Tenerife, Calle Mandillo Tejera 8, Santa Cruz De Tenerife 38004, Tenerife, Spain.
C3 Universidad de la Laguna
RP Ríos-Mesa, D (corresponding author), Univ La Laguna, Agr & Rural Engn Dept, Ctra Geneto 2, San Cristobal la Laguna 38071, Tenerife, Spain.; Ríos-Mesa, D (corresponding author), Ctr Conservat Agr Biodivers Tenerife, Cabildo Insular Tenerife, Calle Mandillo Tejera 8, Santa Cruz De Tenerife 38004, Tenerife, Spain.
EM mcjaizme@icia.es
RI Mesa, Domingo/AFI-9027-2022; Rios Mesa, Domingo Jose/H-5375-2015
OI Rios Mesa, Domingo Jose/0000-0002-6232-2828
FU National Institute of Agricultural Research of Spain (INIA)
   [RTA2011-00110-00-00]
FX This research work has received funds to finance the award of a
   pre-doctoral grant within the programme of aid for the Training of
   Research Staff of the FPI-INIA Sub-programme within the framework of the
   National Plan for Scientific Research, Development and Technological
   Innovation 2008-2011 of the National Institute for Agricultural and Food
   Research and Technology (INIA).Furthermore, this work has been carried
   out within the framework of the research project of the National
   Institute of Agricultural Research of Spain (INIA) "Improvement of the
   production andquality of traditional tomato varieties through the
   application of mycorrhizal fungi, under differentcultivation systems"
   RTA2011-00110-00-00
CR Al-Karaki GN, 2001, MYCORRHIZA, V11, P43, DOI 10.1007/s005720100098
   Al-Karaki GN, 2001, J PLANT NUTR, V24, P1311, DOI 10.1081/PLN-100106983
   Al-Karaki GN, 2000, MYCORRHIZA, V10, P51, DOI 10.1007/s005720000055
   Alhendawi RA, 1997, J PLANT NUTR, V20, P1731, DOI 10.1080/01904169709365371
   Amador L., 2012, Variedades Tradicionales de Tomates de Canarias, P1
   BARRS HD, 1962, AUST J BIOL SCI, V15, P413, DOI 10.1071/BI9620413
   Basak H, 2011, AFR J AGR RES, V6, P2532
   Bennett AE, 2022, ANNU REV PLANT BIOL, V73, P649, DOI 10.1146/annurev-arplant-102820-124504
   BRUNDRETT MC, 1985, CAN J BOT, V63, P184, DOI 10.1139/b85-021
   BUWALDA JG, 1983, NEW PHYTOL, V93, P217, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1983.tb03426.x
   Cartmill AD, 2007, J PLANT NUTR, V30, P1517, DOI 10.1080/01904160701556802
   Cceres-Hernndez J.J., 2018, Inf. Tec. Ecn. Agrar, V114, P280, DOI [10.12706/itea.2018.017, DOI 10.12706/ITEA.2018.017]
   Chandrasekaran M, 2021, J FUNGI, V7, DOI 10.3390/jof7040303
   Colla G, 2008, BIOL FERT SOILS, V44, P501, DOI 10.1007/s00374-007-0232-8
   Copeman RH, 1996, HORTSCIENCE, V31, P341, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.31.3.341
   Cuartero J, 1999, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V78, P83, DOI 10.1016/S0304-4238(98)00191-5
   Dorais M, 2001, AGRONOMIE, V21, P367, DOI 10.1051/agro:2001130
   Estrada B, 2013, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V36, P1771, DOI 10.1111/pce.12082
   Estrada B, 2013, PLANT SCI, V201, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.11.009
   Evelin H, 2009, ANN BOT-LONDON, V104, P1263, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcp251
   Feng G, 2002, MYCORRHIZA, V12, P185, DOI 10.1007/s00572-002-0170-0
   Garcia K, 2014, FRONT PLANT SCI, V5, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00337
   Garg N, 2008, J PLANT GROWTH REGUL, V27, P115, DOI 10.1007/s00344-007-9038-z
   Gerdemann J. W., 1975, The Development and Function of Roots. Third Cabot Symposium, Petersham, Massachusetts, USA, April 1974 (Torrey, J.G.; Clarkson, D.T., Editors)., P575
   Gianinazzi S, 2010, MYCORRHIZA, V20, P519, DOI 10.1007/s00572-010-0333-3
   Giri B, 2004, MYCORRHIZA, V14, P307, DOI 10.1007/s00572-003-0274-1
   Giri B, 2007, MICROB ECOL, V54, P753, DOI 10.1007/s00248-007-9239-9
   Gómez-Bellot MJ, 2021, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V283, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110040
   GRAHAM JH, 1984, NEW PHYTOL, V97, P277, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1984.tb04132.x
   Guerra J., 2010, Ph.D. Thesis
   Hajiboland R, 2010, PLANT SOIL, V331, P313, DOI 10.1007/s11104-009-0255-z
   HEWITT E. J., 1952
   Huang JC, 2013, J SOIL SCI PLANT NUT, V13, P469, DOI 10.4067/S0718-95162012005000036
   Jahromi F, 2008, MICROB ECOL, V55, P45, DOI 10.1007/s00248-007-9249-7
   Kaya C, 2009, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V121, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.01.001
   KOSKE RE, 1989, MYCOL RES, V92, P486, DOI 10.1016/S0953-7562(89)80195-9
   Latef AAHA, 2016, J PLANT BIOL, V59, P407, DOI 10.1007/s12374-016-0237-7
   Latef AAHA, 2011, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V127, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.020
   LICHTENTHALER HK, 1987, METHOD ENZYMOL, V148, P350
   Liu MY, 2023, CHEM BIOL TECHNOL AG, V10, DOI 10.1186/s40538-022-00368-2
   Ruiz-Lozano JM, 2012, J EXP BOT, V63, P4033, DOI 10.1093/jxb/ers126
   MEDEIROS CAB, 1994, MYCORRHIZA, V4, P185, DOI 10.1007/BF00206778
   Murkute A. A., 2006, Zahradnictvi (Horticultural Science), V33, P70
   Navarro JM, 2000, PLANT SCI, V157, P89, DOI 10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00272-7
   Pearce RC, 1999, J PLANT NUTR, V22, P1069, DOI 10.1080/01904169909365696
   Pearce RC, 1999, J PLANT NUTR, V22, P1079, DOI 10.1080/01904169909365697
   PHILLIPS JM, 1970, T BRIT MYCOL SOC, V55, P158, DOI 10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3
   PLENCHETTE C, 1983, PLANT SOIL, V70, P199, DOI 10.1007/BF02374780
   Rillig MC, 2019, NEW PHYTOL, V222, P1171, DOI 10.1111/nph.15602
   Ruiz-Lozano JM, 2000, MYCORRHIZA, V10, P137, DOI 10.1007/s005720000075
   Sellitto VM, 2019, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/agriculture9050110
   Senge, 2016, REV AGR SCI, V4, P46, DOI DOI 10.7831/RAS.4.46
   Sheng M, 2008, MYCORRHIZA, V18, P287, DOI 10.1007/s00572-008-0180-7
   TANG CX, 1993, ANN BOT-LONDON, V71, P201, DOI 10.1006/anbo.1993.1025
   van Aarle IM, 2002, NEW PHYTOL, V155, P173, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00439.x
   Vargas G.E., 2001, Ph.D. Thesis
   Verslues PE, 2006, PLANT J, V45, P523, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02593.x
   Wahab A, 2023, PLANTS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/plants12173102
   Zuccarini P, 2008, J PLANT NUTR, V31, P497, DOI 10.1080/01904160801895027
NR 59
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 4
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2077-0472
J9 AGRICULTURE-BASEL
JI Agriculture-Basel
PD JUN
PY 2024
VL 14
IS 6
AR 828
DI 10.3390/agriculture14060828
PG 19
WC Agronomy
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA WJ3A3
UT WOS:001254452000001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Xiao, Y
   Gu, R
   Zhou, Q
   Chen, MY
   Zhang, TT
   Xu, C
   Zhu, ZH
AF Xiao, Yang
   Gu, Ran
   Zhou, Qiang
   Chen, Mengyang
   Zhang, Taotao
   Xu, Chen
   Zhu, Zhenhong
TI Spatiotemporal variations of precipitation patterns in the middle and
   lower reaches of Yangtze River Basin
SO MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE ARIMA; climate change; evolution; flooding; fresh water; hydrology;
   precipitation; simulations
ID TRENDS; EXTREMES; MODEL; SIMULATION; STREAMFLOW; RAINFALL; FLOODS; CHINA
AB Context With escalating global climate change, regional flood disasters have become increasingly prevalent. Precipitation, as a primary influencing factor, has garnered significant attention.Aims This study is based on precipitation data to investigate the spatiotemporal characteristics of precipitation in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River Basin (MLYB), trying to explore more concise methods for precipitation forecasting.Methods Statistical methods were employed to analyse historical precipitation patterns, followed by forecasting future trends using statistical time series models.Key results Precipitation in the MLYB exhibited a decreasing trend during 1961-2010, which shifted to an increasing trend after 2011, becoming more pronounced since 2017. Precipitation patterns in the MLYB were clearly increasing in the east and decreasing in the west, with the Taihu Basin showing the greatest rise. The ARIMA model predicted a significant increase in precipitation after 2022.Conclusions In recent years, precipitation in the MLYB has significantly increased, especially in downstream areas. Although the ARIMA model offers an effective and reasonably simple method for short-term forecast, it struggles with complex terrain influences.Implications These findings provide a theoretical basis for flood prevention in the MLYB, as well as a reference for precipitation prediction simulations in data-limited regions.
   Exploring trends in rainfall across the middle and lower Yangtze River Basin from 1961 to 2022, this study showed a shift from reduced fluctuations to increased precipitation c. 2011, becoming notably pronounced after 2017. Utilising ARIMA models and expert techniques, it forecast future trends, aiding flood management and climate adaptation strategies, with implications for advanced climate modelling and data analytics.This article belongs to the collection Ecological monitoring and assessment of freshwater ecosystems: new trends and future challenges.
C1 [Xiao, Yang; Gu, Ran] Hohai Univ, Coll Water Conservancy & Hydropower Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
   [Xiao, Yang] Hohai Univ, Minist Water Resources, Key Lab Hydrol Cycle & Hydrodynam Syst, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
   [Xiao, Yang; Zhou, Qiang; Chen, Mengyang; Zhang, Taotao] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Suzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Xu, Chen; Zhu, Zhenhong] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Geog Sci & Geomat Engn, 99 Xuefu Rd, Suzhou 215009, Peoples R China.
C3 Hohai University; Hohai University; Suzhou University of Science &
   Technology; Suzhou University of Science & Technology
RP Xu, C (corresponding author), Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Geog Sci & Geomat Engn, 99 Xuefu Rd, Suzhou 215009, Peoples R China.
EM xc_mornings@163.com
RI zhang, taotao/AAK-6896-2021
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [U2240209, 52379075,
   52309102, 42201132]; National Key Research and Development Program of
   China [2023YFC3208601]
FX This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (grant numbers U2240209 and 52379075 were received by Yang Xiao,
   grant numbers 52309102 and 42201132 were received by Taotao Zhang and
   Chen Xu respectively), the National Key Research and Development Program
   of China (grant number 2023YFC3208601, received by Yang Xiao).
CR Abbas AS, 2023, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V9, P2796, DOI 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-11-011
   Arianti I, 2023, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V9, P787, DOI 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-04-02
   Babu CN, 2014, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V23, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.05.028
   Chen JH, 2023, INT J CLIMATOL, V43, P3493, DOI 10.1002/joc.8040
   Ding YH, 2021, ADV ATMOS SCI, V38, P1980, DOI 10.1007/s00376-021-0361-2
   Duan WL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, P401, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2207-2
   Duci V., 2011, K Bulletin of the Serbian Geographical Society, V91, P51, DOI [10.2298/GSGD1102051D, DOI 10.2298/GSGD1102051D]
   Ghosh S, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P86, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1327
   Giorgi F, 2019, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V10, P73, DOI 10.5194/esd-10-73-2019
   Guayjarernpanishk P., 2023, Emerging Science Journal, V7, P1116, DOI [10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-04-06, DOI 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-04-06]
   Huang DP, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V64, P1575, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0323-1
   Kumar V, 2010, HYDROLOG SCI J, V55, P484, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2010.481373
   Lai YC, 2020, WEATHER FORECAST, V35, P959, DOI 10.1175/WAF-D-19-0158.1
   Li X, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V760, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144244
   Li Y, 2021, ATMOS RES, V253, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105406
   Liu Y, 2017, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V31, P4875, DOI 10.1007/s11269-017-1783-6
   Liu Y, 2023, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2205.14415
   Mallakpour I, 2016, HYDROLOG SCI J, V61, P245, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2015.1008482
   Manton MJ, 2001, INT J CLIMATOL, V21, P269, DOI 10.1002/joc.610
   Martinez-Villalobos C, 2018, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V45, P8586, DOI 10.1029/2018GL078465
   Mathbout S, 2018, PURE APPL GEOPHYS, V175, P3875, DOI 10.1007/s00024-017-1695-7
   Pan C, 2023, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V50, DOI 10.1029/2023GL104195
   Ran QH, 2022, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V26, P4919, DOI 10.5194/hess-26-4919-2022
   Shen BZ, 2012, ACTA PHYS SIN-CH ED, V61, DOI 10.7498/aps.61.109202
   Singh D, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V118, P7063, DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50543
   Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China, 2012, Grade of precipitation
   Su B, 2008, QUATERN INT, V186, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2007.09.001
   Tabari H, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-24069-9
   Wang JD, 2014, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V152, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2014.06.004
   Wang SS, 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V22, P4201, DOI 10.5194/hess-22-4201-2018
   Wang WC, 2015, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V29, P2655, DOI 10.1007/s11269-015-0962-6
   Wang ZX, 2023, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101593
   Wilson D, 2010, J HYDROL, V394, P334, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.010
   Wu HTJ, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P1340, DOI 10.1002/2015GL067371
   Yang P, 2022, ATMOS RES, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106087
   [杨晓斌 Yang Xiaobin], 2012, [南水北调与水利科技, South-to-North Water Diversion and Water Science & Technology], V10, P70
   Yin HF, 2001, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V41, P105, DOI 10.1016/S0169-555X(01)00108-8
   Yu FL, 2009, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V113, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.03.008
   Zhang Q, 2006, J HYDROL, V324, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.023
   Zhou ZQ, 2021, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V118, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2022255118
NR 40
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 11
U2 11
PU CSIRO PUBLISHING
PI CLAYTON SOUTH
PA Private Bag 10, CLAYTON SOUTH, VIC 3169, AUSTRALIA
SN 1323-1650
EI 1448-6059
J9 MAR FRESHWATER RES
JI Mar. Freshw. Res.
PY 2024
VL 75
IS 12
SI SI
AR MF24135
DI 10.1071/MF24135
PG 13
WC Fisheries; Limnology; Marine & Freshwater Biology; Oceanography
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Fisheries; Marine & Freshwater Biology; Oceanography
GA A8S5X
UT WOS:001285184100001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Melanidis, MS
   Hagerman, S
   St-Laurent, GP
   Oakes, LE
   Cross, MS
AF Melanidis, Marina Stavroula
   Hagerman, Shannon
   St-Laurent, Guillaume Peterson
   Oakes, Lauren E. E.
   Cross, Molly S. S.
TI Exploring the emergence of a tipping point for conservation with
   increased recognition of social considerations
SO CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE conservation planning; conservation social science; human dimensions;
   justice; nature-based solutions; social considerations; ciencias
   sociales de la conservacion; consideraciones sociales; dimensiones
   humanas; justicia; planeacion de la conservacion; soluciones basadas en
   la naturaleza; (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic);
   (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic); (sic)(sic);
   (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)
ID GLOBAL CONSERVATION; INTERDISCIPLINARY; WILDERNESS; SCIENCE; POLICY;
   NEED
AB Despite a common understanding of the harmful impacts of Western conservation models that separate people from nature, widespread progress toward incorporating socioeconomic, political, cultural, and spiritual considerations in conservation practice is lacking. For some, the concept of nature-based solutions (NbS) is seen as an interdisciplinary and holistic pathway to better integrate human well-being in conservation. We examined how conservation practitioners in the United States view NbS and how social considerations are or are not incorporated in conservation adaptation projects. We interviewed 28 individuals working on 15 different such projects associated with the Wildlife Conservation Society's Climate Adaptation Fund. We completed 2 rounds of iterative coding in NVivo 12.6.1 to identify in the full text of all interview responses an a priori set of themes related to our research questions and emergent themes. Many respondents saw this moment as a tipping point for the field (one in which the perceived values of social considerations are increasing in conservation practice) (76%) and that social justice concerns and the need to overcome racist and colonial roots of Western conservation have risen to the forefront. Respondents also tentatively agreed that NbS in conservation could support social and ecological outcomes for conservation, but that it was far from guaranteed. Despite individual intention and awareness among practitioners to incorporate social considerations in conservation practice, structural barriers, including limited funding and inflexible grant structures, continue to constrain systemic change. Ultimately, systemic changes that address power and justice in policy and practice are required to leverage this moment to more fully address social considerations in conservation.
C1 [Melanidis, Marina Stavroula; Hagerman, Shannon; St-Laurent, Guillaume Peterson] Univ British Columbia, Fac Forestry, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   [Oakes, Lauren E. E.; Cross, Molly S. S.] Wildlife Conservat Soc, Bronx, NY USA.
   [Oakes, Lauren E. E.] Stanford Univ, Dept Earth Syst Sci, Stanford, CA USA.
   [Melanidis, Marina Stavroula] Univ British Columbia, Fac Forestry, 2900-2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
C3 University of British Columbia; Wildlife Conservation Society; Stanford
   University; University of British Columbia
RP Melanidis, MS (corresponding author), Univ British Columbia, Fac Forestry, 2900-2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
EM marina.melanidis@alumni.ubc.ca
RI St-Laurent, Guillaume/AAU-3089-2020
OI Hagerman, Shannon/0000-0002-1830-6126; Melanidis, Marina
   Stavroula/0000-0002-7441-3428
FU British Columbia Graduate Scholarship [6768]; University of British
   Columbia Faculty of Forestry Graduate Award [6439]; Social Sciences and
   Humanities Research Council of Canada [43520170263, 6566]; Doris Duke
   Charitable Foundation
FX British Columbia Graduate Scholarship, Grant/Award Number: 6768;
   University of British Columbia Faculty of Forestry Graduate Award,
   Grant/Award Number: 6439; Social Sciences and Humanities Research
   Council of Canada, Grant/Award Numbers: 43520170263, 6566; Doris Duke
   Charitable Foundation
CR Ahren M., 2021, STATE WORLDS INDIGEN
   Apostolopoulou E, 2021, GEOFORUM, V124, P236, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.05.006
   Armitage D, 2020, CONSERV SCI PRACT, V2, DOI 10.1111/csp2.160
   Artelle KA, 2019, BIOL CONSERV, V240, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108284
   Ban NC, 2013, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V11, P194, DOI 10.1890/110205
   Bennett NJ, 2016, CONSERV BIOL, V30, P582, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12681
   Berkes F., 2021, ADV INTRO COMMUNITY
   Blackman A, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P4123, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1603290114
   Blicharska M, 2016, BIOL CONSERV, V199, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.007
   Buscher Bram., 2020, CONSERVATION REVOLUT
   Calliari E, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V656, P691, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.341
   Chapin M., 2004, WORLD WATCH MAGAZINE
   Charmaz K., 2014, CONSTRUCTING GROUNDE
   Chaudhury A, 2021, CONSERV LETT, V14, DOI 10.1111/conl.12774
   Christie P, 2017, MAR POLICY, V84, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.002
   Cohen-Shacham E., 2016, Nature-based Solutions to address global societal challenges, V97, P2016, DOI [DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.EN, DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.ENB.P001/REF]
   Colchester M, 2004, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V7, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.02.004
   Collins YA, 2021, J POLIT ECOL, V28, P1
   Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), 2022, DEC CBD COP 15 L25 K
   Creswell J. W., 2018, Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
   Cribb R., 2007, INTERVENTIONS-UK, V9, P49, DOI DOI 10.1080/13698010601173817
   Cronon W, 1995, UNCOMMON GROUND, P69
   Díaz S, 2018, SCIENCE, V359, P270, DOI 10.1126/science.aap8826
   Domínguez L, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9030065
   Doolittle AmityA., 2010, Conservation Society, V8, P286, DOI DOI 10.4103/0972-4923.78142
   Duffy R, 2019, BIOL CONSERV, V232, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.013
   Fletcher MS, 2021, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V118, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2022218118
   Griffin C. J., 2019, MORAL ECOLOGIES HIST, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-06112-8, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-06112-8]
   Grove RichardH., 1995, Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600-1860
   GUHA R, 1989, ENVIRON ETHICS, V11, P71, DOI 10.5840/enviroethics198911123
   Hagerman SM, 2021, BIOL CONSERV, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108980
   Hall TD, 2008, GLOBALIZATIONS, V5, P1, DOI 10.1080/14747730701574478
   Hanson HI, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104302
   Harbi J, 2018, FOREST POLICY ECON, V94, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.05.011
   Holstein J. A., 1995, ACTIVE INTERVIEW, VVII
   ICCA Consortium, 2021, TERR AR CONS IND PEO
   IUCN, 2020, Global Standards for Nature-Based Solutions, DOI DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.08.EN
   Kashwan P, 2021, ENVIRONMENT, V63, P4, DOI 10.1080/00139157.2021.1924574
   Kotsila P, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V4, P252, DOI 10.1177/2514848620901437
   Martin A, 2016, BIOL CONSERV, V197, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.021
   Mascia MB, 2003, CONSERV BIOL, V17, P649, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01738.x
   Melanidis M. S., 2022, BIG IDEAS BIG POTENT
   Melanidis MS, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V132, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.02.028
   Nesshöver C, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V579, P1215, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106
   Oldekop JA, 2016, CONSERV BIOL, V30, P133, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12568
   Osaka S, 2021, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V12, DOI 10.1002/wcc.729
   Ostrom E., 1990, GOVERNING COMMONS EV, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
   Palomo I, 2021, ONE EARTH, V4, P730, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.013
   Portner H., 2021, IPBES-IPCC co-sponsored workshop report on biodiversity and climate change, DOI DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.4782538
   Randeria Shalini., 2007, Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, V9, P12, DOI DOI 10.1080/13698010601173791
   Randrup TB, 2020, URBAN ECOSYST, V23, P919, DOI 10.1007/s11252-020-00964-w
   Reed G, 2022, CLIM POLICY, V22, P514, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2022.2047585
   Rudd LF, 2021, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V288, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2021.1871
   Sandbrook C, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P316, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0267-5
   Sandbrook C, 2013, CONSERV BIOL, V27, P1487, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12141
   Sandbrook C, 2012, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V25, P915, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2011.644394
   Sarmiento Barletti J. P., 2017, RIGHTS ABUSE ALLEGAT, DOI [10.17528/cifor/006630, DOI 10.17528/CIFOR/006630]
   Schensul S.L., 1999, ESSENTIAL ETHNOGRAPH
   Schulz KA, 2017, J POLIT ECOL, V24, P125, DOI 10.2458/v24i1.20789
   Scoville C, 2017, SCI CULT-UK, V26, P468, DOI 10.1080/09505431.2017.1354846
   Seddon N, 2021, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V27, P1518, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15513
   St-Laurent GP, 2021, COMMUN BIOL, V4, DOI 10.1038/s42003-020-01556-2
   Tauli-Corpuz V., 2018, Cornered by Protected Areas: Replacing Fortress Conservation with Rights-based Approaches Helps Bring Justice for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities, Reduces Conflict, and Enables Cost-Effective Conservation and Climate Action, DOI [10.53892/EXQC6889, DOI 10.53892/EXQC6889]
   Tong A, 2016, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V31, P897, DOI 10.1093/ndt/gfu354
   United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2022, DEC CP27 SHARM EL SH
   Wall Kimmerer R., 2013, Braiding Sweetgrass
   Welden EA, 2021, PEOPLE NAT, V3, P966, DOI 10.1002/pan3.10212
   West P, 2006, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V35, P251, DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123308
   Wildcat M, 2014, DECOLONIZATION, V3, pI
   Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), 2021, WCS CLIM AD FUND
NR 70
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 1
U2 12
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0888-8892
EI 1523-1739
J9 CONSERV BIOL
JI Conserv. Biol.
PD AUG
PY 2023
VL 37
IS 4
DI 10.1111/cobi.14086
EA JUN 2023
PG 12
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA N1VS9
UT WOS:001004551800001
PM 36919451
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Loli, M
   Kefalas, G
   Dafis, S
   Mitoulis, SA
   Schmidt, F
AF Loli, Marianna
   Kefalas, George
   Dafis, Stavros
   Mitoulis, Stergios Aristoteles
   Schmidt, Franziska
TI Flood damage inspection and risk indexing data for an inventory of
   bridges in Central Greece
SO DATA IN BRIEF
LA English
DT Article; Data Paper
DE Floods; Extreme weather; Flood adaptation; Case study; Field data;
   Network; Risk analysis
AB This dataset is related to the research paper entitled "Bridge -specific flood risk assessment of transport networks using GIS and remotely sensed data" published in the Science of the Total Environment. It provides the information neces-sary for the reproduction of the case study that was used for the demonstration and validation of the proposed risk assessment framework. The latter integrates indicators for the assessment of hydraulic hazards and bridge vulnerability with a simple and operationally flexible protocol for the in-terpretation of bridge damage consequences on the service-ability of the transport network and on the affected socio-economic environment. The dataset encompasses (i) inven-tory data for the 117 bridges of the Karditsa Prefecture, in Central Greece, which were affected by a historic flood that followed the Mediterranean Hurricane (Medicane) Ianos, in September 2020; (ii) results of the risk assessment analy-sis, including the geospatial distribution of hazard, vulnera-bility, bridge damage, and associated consequences for the area's transport network; (iii) an extensive damage inspec-tion record, compiled shortly after the Medicane, involving a sample of 16 (out of the 117) bridges of varying char-acteristics and damage levels, ranging from minimal dam-age to complete failure, which was used as a reference for validation of the proposed framework. The dataset is com-plemented by photos of the inspected bridges which facili-tate the understanding of the observed bridge damage pat-terns. This information is intended to provide insights into the response of riverine bridges to severe floods and a thor-ough base for comparison and validation of flood hazard and risk mapping tools, potentially useful for engineers, as-set managers, network operators and stakeholders involved in decision-making for climate adaptation of the road sector.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
C1 [Loli, Marianna] Grid Engineers, Athens, Greece.
   [Kefalas, George] Int Hellen Univ, Dept Forest & Nat Environm, Athens, Greece.
   [Dafis, Stavros] Natl Observ Athens, Inst Environm Res & Sustainable Dev, Athens, Greece.
   [Dafis, Stavros] Data4Risk, Paris, France.
   [Mitoulis, Stergios Aristoteles] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, England.
   [Schmidt, Franziska] Univ Gustave Eiffel, Eiffel, France.
C3 National Observatory of Athens; University of Birmingham
RP Loli, M (corresponding author), Grid Engineers, Athens, Greece.
EM m.loli@grid-engineers.com
RI Kefalas, George/AAP-2004-2021; Mitoulis, Stergios/JLL-2823-2023;
   Schmidt, Franziska/F-1157-2017; Dafis, Stavros/W-2096-2018
OI Schmidt, Franziska/0000-0001-9277-9805; Dafis,
   Stavros/0000-0002-1513-1930; MITOULIS, STERGIOS
   ARISTOTELES/0000-0001-7201-2703
FU European Union H2020 -Marie Sk?odowska-Curie Research Grants Scheme
   [MSCA-IF-2019, 895432]; Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [895432] Funding
   Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
FX This study has been funded by the European Union H2020 -Marie
   Sk?odowska-Curie Research Grants Scheme MSCA-IF-2019 (grant agreement No
   895432: ReBounce-Integrated resilience as- sessment of bridges and
   transport networks exposed to hydraulic hazards) .
CR Kotroni V., ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V12, P11
   Lagouvardos K., 2021, B AM METEOROL SOC, DOI [10.1175/BAMSD-20-0274.1, DOI 10.1175/BAMSD-20-0274.1]
   Listowski C, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14236162
   Loli M., P 11 INT C BRIDG MAI
   Loli M., 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON
   Loli M, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V822, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153661
   Tegos A, 2022, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/hydrology9050093
   YPEKA, 2018, FLOOD RISK ASS
   Zekkos D, 2020, The September 18-20 2020 Medicane Ianos Impact on Greece Phase I Reconnaissance Report, DOI [10.18118/G6MT1, DOI 10.18118/G6MT1T, 10.18118/G6MT1T]
NR 9
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 3
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2352-3409
J9 DATA BRIEF
JI Data Brief
PD JUN
PY 2023
VL 48
AR 109062
DI 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109062
EA MAR 2023
PG 8
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA A9YO4
UT WOS:000958601400001
PM 37006387
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Soe, YM
   Shinogi, Y
   Taniguchi, T
AF Soe, Yinn Mar
   Shinogi, Yoshiyuki
   Taniguchi, Tomoyuki
TI Impacts of perforated sheet pipe installation on some paddy soil
   properties
SO PADDY AND WATER ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article; Proceedings Paper
CT Joint International Nara Conference of the
   International-Society-of-Paddy-and-Water-Environment-Engineering
   (PAWEES) and the
   International-Network-for-Water-and-Ecosystem-in-Paddy-Fields (INWEPF)
   (Nara Conference)
CY NOV 20-22, 2018
CL Nara, JAPAN
SP Int Soc Paddy & Water Environm Engn, Int Network Water & Ecosystem Paddy Fields
DE Perforated drainage plastic sheet pipe; Paddy soils; Soil aeration;
   Infiltration
ID ORGANIC-MATTER; TILLAGE; DRAINAGE; INFILTRATION; MANAGEMENT; STABILITY;
   QUALITY; LIME
AB Today, the world's vision emphasizes the development of climate-adaptive agriculture for food security and provision of water with safe technology. Under extreme weather conditions, it is necessary to manage water effectively. We must not neglect drainage as a water management option for sustainable agricultural production. Specially designed perforated sheet pipe drains have been developed in Japan recently to control the underground water table and to upgrade croplands from lowlands to uplands. As soils with perforated sheet pipes installed could potentially improve soil aeration, and land conversion could also influence soil functions and properties, this study focuses on the importance of soil properties changed around perforated sheet pipes installed at a depth of 40cm in former paddy soils. Using (3x3x2) factorial design with three replications, soils were sampled on farmland in the Japanese towns of Hisayama, Fukuoka and Usa, Oita, respectively, in 2017 based on three stream sites (upstream, midstream and downstream), three distances from the sheet pipe (center, 1m and 2m) and two soil depths of 10cm and 25cm, respectively. Thirteen potentially changeable soil properties were measured, and all recorded data were analyzed statistically by performing the F test. All means were also compared at least the 5% significantly different level. As the results, there was a major improvement in air-filled capacity and infiltration above the installed perforated sheet pipe. The nearer the sheet pipe, the more the soil bulked together, with the more significant increase in soil organic matter, and total carbonate content that promotes the formation of soil macropores, at 1m of sheet pipe distance in the deep paddy soil layer. The increase in the porosity (f) of studied soils allows more water and air to pass through.
C1 [Soe, Yinn Mar; Shinogi, Yoshiyuki; Taniguchi, Tomoyuki] Kyushu Univ, Sch Agr, Lab Irrigat & Water Management, Div Bioprod Environm Sci,Dept Agroenvironm Sci, Fukuoka, Fukuoka 8190395, Japan.
C3 Kyushu University
RP Soe, YM (corresponding author), Kyushu Univ, Sch Agr, Lab Irrigat & Water Management, Div Bioprod Environm Sci,Dept Agroenvironm Sci, Fukuoka, Fukuoka 8190395, Japan.
EM yinnmar2011@gmail.com
FU Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
FX The authors would like to express their special thanks to Japan
   International Cooperation Agency (JICA) for supporting grants and Japan
   Association of Sheet Pipe Promotion (JASPIP) for providing sheet pipe
   installation in fields and tutoring about sheet pipe information. In
   addition, we wish to thank Dr. Tetsuro Fukuda, former Associate
   Professor at Kyushu University, the president of the JASPIP and some
   administrative staff at the Institute of Agricultural research for their
   kind assistance. Finally, we never forget to give our thanks to
   undergraduate students and our senior PhD student who helped in
   collecting soil samples and field determinations.
CR Amitava Chatterjee Amitava Chatterjee, 2016, Soil fertility management in agroecosystems, P124
   [Anonymous], WAT MAN NETH
   [Anonymous], 1994, SOIL SCI METHODS APP, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315844855
   Beck K, 2003, BUILD ENVIRON, V38, P1151, DOI 10.1016/S0360-1323(03)00074-X
   CASTRO C, 1991, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V55, P1407, DOI 10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500050034x
   Chaudhari P.R., 2013, INT J SCI RES PUBLIC, V3, P2250
   CHRISTEN EW, 2001, 3801 CSIRO
   Cockroft B, 1997, DEV SOIL SCI, V25, P339
   Daniele DW, 2003, 9 INT DRAIN WORKSH D, P37
   Dohnal M, 2009, BIOLOGIA, V64, P580, DOI 10.2478/s11756-009-0078-7
   George AP, 1987, USDA ERS MISCELLANEO, V1455
   Glantz MH, 2018, WORLD METEOROL ORG B, V67, P1
   GREENLAND DJ, 1977, PHILOS T R SOC B, V281, P193, DOI 10.1098/rstb.1977.0133
   Haynes R.J., 1996, Structure and Organic Matter Storage in Agricultural Soils, P213
   Haynes RJ, 1998, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V51, P123, DOI 10.1023/A:1009738307837
   Hoorman JJ, 2006, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V61, p94A
   International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), 2003, SOIL AGGR STAB WET S
   IRIO L, 2015, SUGARCANE, P161
   Jia X, 2008, ASABE ANN INT M
   Josa R, 2013, BIOLOGIA, V68, P1099, DOI 10.2478/s11756-013-0250-y
   Kay B.D., 1990, ADV SOIL SCI, V12, P1
   Kemper WD, 1987, AGRONOMY MONOGRAPH, V9
   Kumar S, 2014, SOIL SCI PLANT NUTR, V60, P108, DOI 10.1080/00380768.2013.878643
   Lal Rantan., 2004, PRINCIPLES SOIL PHYS
   Lopez FB, 2017, PHARMACOGNOSY: FUNDAMENTALS, APPLICATIONS AND STRATEGIES, P45, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-802104-0.00004-4
   Mayer LM, 2004, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V68, P3863, DOI 10.1016/j.gca.2004.03.019
   Mordhorst A, 2017, J PLANT NUTR SOIL SC, V180, P153, DOI 10.1002/jpln.201600351
   Nakajima T, 2014, SOIL TILL RES, V135, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2013.09.003
   Ray BD, 1998, ADV SOIL S, P169
   Reynolds WD, 2003, CAN J SOIL SCI, V83, P381, DOI 10.4141/S02-066
   ROTH CH, 1991, GEODERMA, V48, P351, DOI 10.1016/0016-7061(91)90053-V
   Scheumann W., 2002, Zeitschrift fur Bewasserungswirtschaft, V37, P33
   Schumacher BA, 2002, EMASC001 ORD USEPA N
   Simundsson A, 2016, RES REPORT
   Stata-15, 2017, STAT DAT AN SOFTW
   Sug Z, 2007, ASSESSING US FARM DR
   TISDALL JM, 1982, J SOIL SCI, V33, P141, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x
   UN, 2018, SDG6 Synthesis Report 2018, DOI [10.1126/science.278.5339.827, DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.278.5339.827]
   United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), 2016, PROGR WORK BUDG BIEN
   Vermont Clean Water Initiatives VCWI, 2017, VERM SUBS AGR TIL DR
   Wagenet RJ, 1984, ECOLOGICAL STUDIES A, V51
   WHITE RE, 1985, ADV SOIL SCI, V3
NR 42
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 2
U2 6
PU SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
PI HEIDELBERG
PA TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
SN 1611-2490
EI 1611-2504
J9 PADDY WATER ENVIRON
JI Paddy Water Environ.
PD APR
PY 2019
VL 17
IS 2
SI SI
BP 151
EP 164
DI 10.1007/s10333-019-00707-4
PG 14
WC Agricultural Engineering; Agronomy
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Agriculture
GA HZ6TU
UT WOS:000468986100012
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Creighton, C
   Hobday, AJ
   Lockwood, M
   Pecl, GT
AF Creighton, Colin
   Hobday, Alistair J.
   Lockwood, Michael
   Pecl, Gretta T.
TI Adapting Management of Marine Environments to a Changing Climate: A
   Checklist to Guide Reform and Assess Progress
SO ECOSYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE marine biodiversity; fisheries management; marine conservation; climate
   change; adaptation; transformation
ID SOUTHERN BLUEFIN TUNA; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; AUSTRALIAN MARINE;
   RAPID ASSESSMENT; CHANGE IMPACTS; ADAPTATION; VULNERABILITY; GOVERNANCE;
   FISHERIES; OCEAN
AB Documented impacts of climate change on marine systems indicate widespread changes in many geographic regions and throughout all levels of the ocean's food webs. Oceans provide the main source of animal protein for over a billion people, and contribute significantly to food security for billions more. Clearly, if we are to continue to derive these benefits, then the rate of adaptation in our human systems needs to at least keep pace with the rate of ecological change for these benefits to continue. An Australia-wide program of research into marine biodiversity and fisheries explored the opportunities for policy and management to respond to a changing climate. The research program spanned all Australian estuarine-nearshore and marine environments-tropical, subtropical, and temperate-and focused on two key marine sectors: biodiversity conservation and fisheries (commercial, recreational, and aquaculture). Key findings from across this strategic and extensive research investment were the need to foster resilience through habitat repair and protection, improve resource allocation strategies, fine-tune fisheries management systems, and enhance whole of government approaches and policies. Building on these findings, from a climate adaptation perspective, we generated a checklist of thirteen elements encompassing all project findings to assess and steer progress towards improving marine policy and management. These elements are grouped in three broad areas: preconditioning; future proofing; and transformational changes and opportunities. Arising from these elements is a suite of priority strategies that provide guidance for marine managers, policy practitioners, and stakeholders as they prepare for a future under climate change. As the research program encompassed a wide range of habitats and ecosystems, spanned a latitudinal range of over 30A degrees, and considered a diversity of management systems and approaches, many of these elements and strategies will be applicable in a global context.
C1 [Creighton, Colin] Fisheries Res & Dev Corp, Deakin West, ACT 2600, Australia.
   [Hobday, Alistair J.] CSIRO, Oceans & Atmosphere, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia.
   [Hobday, Alistair J.; Pecl, Gretta T.] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Marine Socioecol, 20 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, Tas 7004, Australia.
   [Lockwood, Michael] Univ Tasmania, Sch Land & Food, Geog & Spatial Sci, Private Bag 78, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia.
   [Pecl, Gretta T.] Univ Tasmania, Inst Marine & Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 49, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia.
   [Creighton, Colin] 117 Lex Creek Rd, Crediton, Qld 4757, Australia.
C3 Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO);
   CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere; University of Tasmania; University of
   Tasmania; University of Tasmania
RP Creighton, C (corresponding author), Fisheries Res & Dev Corp, Deakin West, ACT 2600, Australia.; Creighton, C (corresponding author), 117 Lex Creek Rd, Crediton, Qld 4757, Australia.
EM colinmwnrm@bigpond.com
RI Hobday, Alistair/A-1460-2012; Pecl, Gretta/D-7267-2011
OI Pecl, Gretta/0000-0003-0192-4339
FU Australian Government; CSIRO; State Government
FX The Climate Change Adaptation-Marine Biodiversity and Fisheries research
   initiative was supported by Australian and State Governments, CSIRO, and
   many Australian universities. We acknowledge the contributing research
   efforts led by teams in each of the projects we describe here, and the
   comments of the anonymous reviewers and editor in improving the
   manuscript.
CR AIMS, 2012, AIMS IND MAR IND
   [Anonymous], 2008, Blue Carbon: The Role of Healthy Oceans in Binding Carbon
   [Anonymous], 2011084 FRDC
   [Anonymous], NATL CLIMATE CHANGE
   [Anonymous], 2008, Report
   [Anonymous], IMPLICATIONS CLIMATE
   [Anonymous], 2002, Fish physiology, toxicology, and water quality
   [Anonymous], 2011, VULNERABILITY TROPIC
   [Anonymous], 2010535 FRDC
   Armitage D, 2010, SPRINGER SER ENV MAN, P287, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-12194-4_14
   Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES), 2013, AUSTR FISH STAT 2012
   Ban NC, 2014, CONSERV LETT, V7, P41, DOI 10.1111/conl.12010
   Ban NC, 2013, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V11, P194, DOI 10.1890/110205
   Beck MW, 2011, BIOSCIENCE, V61, P107, DOI 10.1525/bio.2011.61.2.5
   Biggs D, 2011, CONSERV LETT, V4, P169, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00170.x
   BLACKWELL B, 2005, EC EC ACT C DEC 11 1, P143
   Bodin Ö, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002
   Brierley AS, 2009, CURR BIOL, V19, pR602, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.046
   Butler AJ, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011831
   Carpenter SR, 2012, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V4, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.01.001
   Chambers LE, 2015, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V15, P197, DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0634-8
   Costanza R, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V26, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
   Creighton C, 2014, 2009074 FRDC
   Creighton C, 2013, 2012036 FRDC
   Creighton C, 2013, 2011037 FISH RES DEV
   Creighton C, 2015, MAR FRESHWATER RES, V66, P493, DOI 10.1071/MF14041
   Crowder LB, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P617, DOI 10.1126/science.1129706
   Cvitanovic C, 2015, MAR POLICY, V52, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.10.026
   Davidson J, 2013, 3 FISH RES DEV CORP
   Dichmont CM, 2014, REGIONAL EN IN PRESS
   Doney SC, 2012, ANNU REV MAR SCI, V4, P11, DOI 10.1146/annurev-marine-041911-111611
   Falaleeva M, 2011, MAR POLICY, V35, P784, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.01.005
   Fleming A, 2014, CLIM RISK MANAG, V1, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2013.12.003
   Folke C, 2010, SUSTAIN SCI, V5, P151, DOI 10.1007/s11625-010-0109-x
   Fraser DA, 2006, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V113, P49, DOI 10.1007/s10661-005-9096-2
   Frusher SD, 2014, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V24, P593, DOI 10.1007/s11160-013-9325-7
   Gaichas SK, 2014, ICES J MAR SCI, V71, P2323, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsu048
   Gallopin GC, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
   GBRMPA, 2011, TROP CYCL RISK IMP A
   Grafton RQ, 2010, MAR POLICY, V34, P606, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.11.011
   Halpern BS, 2012, NATURE, V488, P615, DOI 10.1038/nature11397
   Hartog JR, 2011, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V58, P746, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.06.005
   Haward M, 2013, MAR POLICY, V38, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.07.004
   Hobday AJ, 2006, FISHERIES MANAG ECOL, V13, P365, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2006.00515.x
   Hobday A.J., 2014, Stanford Environ. Law J, V33, P125
   Hobday AJ, 2014, 20100533 FRDCDCCEE M
   Hobday AJ, FISHERIES O IN PRESS
   Hobday AJ, 2014, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V24, P415, DOI 10.1007/s11160-013-9326-6
   Hobday AJ, 2011, MAR FRESHWATER RES, V62, P1000, DOI 10.1071/MF10302
   Hobday AJ, 2011, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V68, P898, DOI 10.1139/F2011-031
   Hobday AJ, 2010, FISH OCEANOGR, V19, P243, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2419.2010.00540.x
   Hodgkinson JH, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P1663, DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0618-8
   Holbrook NJ, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V124, P703, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1110-7
   Hughes L, 2011, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V11, pS189, DOI 10.1007/s10113-010-0158-9
   Jerry DR, 2014, 2010521 FRDC
   Jiang ZJ, 2013, J WORLD AQUACULT SOC, V44, P133, DOI 10.1111/jwas.12000
   Johnson J.E., 2014, INT J ECOL, V2014, P1, DOI DOI 10.1155/2014/140354
   Kittinger JN, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05115-170417
   Last PR, 2011, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V20, P58, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00575.x
   Lebel L, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Lim-Camacho L, 2015, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V15, P595, DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0670-4
   Link JS, 2011, FISH FISH, V12, P461, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00398.x
   Lockwood M., 2006, MANAGING PROTECTED A
   Lockwood M, 2012, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V69, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.07.015
   Lough JM, 2011, MAR FRESHWATER RES, V62, P984, DOI 10.1071/MF10272
   Madin EMP, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.008
   Maury O, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P314, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.05.008
   Merrie A, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V27, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.012
   Miles EL, 2009, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V34, P17, DOI 10.1146/annurev.environ.33.041707.110117
   New Zealand Seafood Industry Council, 2010, EN EFF HDB INSH VESS
   Ochoa-Ochoa LM, 2013, CONSERV SOC, V11, P291, DOI 10.4103/0972-4923.121034
   Olsson P, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P9489, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0706905105
   Park SE, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.003
   Pearce A., 2011, MARINE HEAT WAVE W A, P40
   Pecl G. T., 2014, 2011039 FISH RES DEV, P278
   Pecl GT, 2008, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V18, P373, DOI 10.1007/s11160-007-9077-3
   Pecl GT, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V127, P505, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1284-z
   Pelletier N, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V24, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.014
   Plagányi EE, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0091833
   Plagányi ÉE, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V119, P181, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0596-0
   Pollnac R, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P18262, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0908266107
   Poloczanska ES, 2007, OCEANOGR MAR BIOL, V45, P407
   Poloczanska ES, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P919, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1958, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1958]
   Poloczanska ES, 2012, REPORT CARD MARINE C
   Polovina JJ, 2014, SEA MARINE ECOSYSTEM, P429
   Prahalad VN, 2011, AUST J BOT, V59, P741, DOI 10.1071/BT11206
   Robinson LM, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V31, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.003
   Rockström J, 2009, NATURE, V461, P472, DOI 10.1038/461472a
   Russell BD, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P2153, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01886.x
   Schlüter M, 2012, NAT RESOUR MODEL, V25, P219, DOI 10.1111/j.1939-7445.2011.00108.x
   Siikamäki J, 2013, ENVIRONMENT, V55, P14, DOI 10.1080/00139157.2013.843981
   Smith MS, 2011, PHILOS T R SOC A, V369, P196, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2010.0277
   Soto D, 2009, 529 FAO FISH AQ DEP
   Spillman CM, 2009, CORAL REEFS, V28, P197, DOI 10.1007/s00338-008-0438-8
   Spillman C. M., 2014, Clim. Risk Manage, V1, P25, DOI [10.1016/j.crm.2013.12.001, DOI 10.1016/J.CRM.2013.12.001]
   Steffen W, 2015, SCIENCE, V347, DOI 10.1126/science.1259855
   Steffen W, 2011, PHILOS T R SOC A, V369, P842, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2010.0327
   Stein BA, 2013, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V11, P502, DOI 10.1890/120277
   Stock CA, 2011, PROG OCEANOGR, V88, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.pocean.2010.09.001
   Taylor A., 2011, The role of leadership for environment and sustainability. guest lecture: perspectives on environment and sustainability
   Thresher RE, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P635, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2611
   Troell M, 2009, AQUACULTURE, V297, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.09.010
   Vaquer-Sunyer R, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P15452, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0803833105
   Veron JEN, 2009, MAR POLLUT BULL, V58, P1428, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.09.009
   Vogel C, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P349, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.002
   Wayte SE, 2013, FISH RES, V142, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2012.07.009
   Welch D. J., 2014, 2010565 FRDC
   Wilcox C, 2007, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V5, P325, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[325:CMAAST]2.0.CO;2
   Wise RM, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002
NR 109
TC 52
Z9 55
U1 0
U2 70
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 1432-9840
EI 1435-0629
J9 ECOSYSTEMS
JI Ecosystems
PD MAR
PY 2016
VL 19
IS 2
BP 187
EP 219
DI 10.1007/s10021-015-9925-2
PG 33
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA DG1AM
UT WOS:000371797400001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Hodgkinson, JH
   Hobday, AJ
   Pinkard, EA
AF Hodgkinson, Jane H.
   Hobday, Alistair J.
   Pinkard, Elizabeth A.
TI Climate adaptation in Australia's resource-extraction industries: ready
   or not?
SO REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate; Fisheries; Mining; Forestry; Adaptation; Extreme events
ID FISHERIES; MARINE; WATER; RISK; RESILIENCE; GOVERNANCE; EUCALYPTUS;
   RESPONSES
AB Australian resource-extraction industries-mining, fisheries and forestry-operate year-round in the natural environment with all three exposed to climate extremes and to long-term climatic change. However, the industries differ in terms of size, ownership and mobility. Although mining companies are 'mobile,' a commitment to a mine site makes them immobile at a location dictated by the presence of a mineral; forestry of natural and managed trees takes place in a specifically selected location that can be changed given a reasonably long time-frame and high financial investment; fishing is the last of the major hunting industries, and despite operating from fixed ports, fishers chase fish across the ocean. All three industries as employers and product providers seek a sustainable future under a changing climate but are subject to environmental variability that impacts on their activities. As each industry has historically dealt with and survived major climate impacts, they typically consider themselves to be resilient, although we illustrate in several case studies that recent climate variability significantly impacts productivity and current resilience is limited. Projected climate change and variability are likely to exacerbate impacts on these industries through new or intensified hazards. Although each industry performs risk management controls to minimize climate-related impacts, a new approach incorporating future climate projections in addition to historical experiences would better prepare each to reduce vulnerability to changing climate. We find that wholesale transformation may not be appropriate or necessary at this time for these industries, and in most cases anticipatory, incremental adaptation should be encouraged, while larger-scale changes are considered in the longer term. Additionally, to overcome some of the barriers and promote the drivers of adaptation, we suggest that a model of adaptive governance coupled with greater use of climate champions may be the most effective method for improving adaptation uptake in these industries.
C1 [Hodgkinson, Jane H.] CSIRO Earth Sci & Resource Engn, CSIRO Climate Adaptat Flagship, Brisbane, Qld 4069, Australia.
   [Hobday, Alistair J.] CSIRO Marine & Atmospher Res, CSIRO Climate Adaptat Flagship, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia.
   [Pinkard, Elizabeth A.] CSIRO Ecosyst Sci, CSIRO Climate Adaptat Flagship, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia.
C3 Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO);
   Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO);
   Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)
RP Hodgkinson, JH (corresponding author), CSIRO Earth Sci & Resource Engn, CSIRO Climate Adaptat Flagship, Brisbane, Qld 4069, Australia.
EM jane.hodgkinson@csiro.au; alistair.hobday@csiro.au;
   libby.pinkard@csiro.au
RI Hobday, Alistair/A-1460-2012; Hodgkinson, Jane/GLT-5216-2022; Pinkard,
   Libby/C-5804-2011
OI Hodgkinson, Jane/0000-0002-4031-3883
FU Climate Adaptation Flagship at CSIRO
FX We appreciate the support of Mark Howden and the Climate Adaptation
   Flagship at CSIRO in undertaking this cross-sectoral analysis. Reviews
   by Anne-Maree Dowd and Mark Howden, two anonymous reviewers and the
   editor greatly improved the clarity and structure of the manuscript.
CR ABARES, 2012, AUSTR FOR GLANC
   Adger WN, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN A, V41, P2800, DOI 10.1068/a42244
   Adger WN, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P77, DOI [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.03.001, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005]
   [Anonymous], 2012, Indian Ocean climate initiative technical report
   [Anonymous], 4 CSIRO
   [Anonymous], 2008, Report
   [Anonymous], 2010, CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship Working Paper No. 5
   [Anonymous], 2012, ADAPTING SUSTAINABLE
   [Anonymous], 2010, ANGL AM OUR NEWS
   [Anonymous], IMPLICATIONS CLIMATE
   [Anonymous], CLIMATE DRIVEN MORTA
   [Anonymous], 2024, Fit for a Changing Climate? Adapting the UK's Transport System
   AON Benfield, 2012, ANN GLOB CLIM CAT RE, P96
   Austrade Australian Trade Commission, 2011, AUSTR DYNAM WAT IND
   Battaglia M, 2004, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V193, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.033
   Battaglia M., 2009, CLIMATE CHANGE AUSTR, P128
   Bell JD, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P591, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1838
   Biesbroek GR, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P440, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.005
   Carnegie AJ, 1997, AUSTRALAS PLANT PATH, V26, P71, DOI 10.1071/AP97012
   CC IP, 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007
   Cheung WWL, 2013, NATURE, V497, P365, DOI 10.1038/nature12156
   Climate Commission, 2013, CHARTS EXTR AUSTR SU
   Cox J, 2012, C20023 PAE ACARP
   CSIRO, 2010, CLIM VAR CHANG S E A, P31
   DAFF, 2010, AUSTR PLANT 2010 INV, P7
   Defeo O, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05971-180430
   DEHAGO, 2006, CLIM CHANG IMP RISK
   Diederen P, 2003, CAHIERS EC SOCIOLOGI
   Donnelly RJ, 2013, STEWARDSHIP ACTION P
   DUTKOWSKI GW, 1995, EUCALYPT PLANTATIONS
   Evans B, 2010, FOREST VULNERABILITY
   Fleming A, 2014, CLIM RISK MANAG, V1, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2013.12.003
   Ford JD, 2010, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V10, P65, DOI 10.1007/s10113-009-0094-8
   Fortescue Metals Group Ltd, 2013, 2012 ENV REP, P19
   Frusher SD, 2014, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V24, P593, DOI 10.1007/s11160-013-9325-7
   Green BS, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0014160
   Hart A, 2013, 2011762 FRDC
   Hatfield-Dodds S, 2007, ANN C AUSTR AGR RES
   Hobday A, 2013, NCCARF 2013
   Hobday AJ, 2011, FISH RES, V108, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2011.01.013
   Hobday AJ, 2010, ADAPTING AGRICULTURE TO CLIMATE CHANGE: PREPARING AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES FOR THE FUTURE, P205
   Hobday AJ, 2011, MAR FRESHWATER RES, V62, P1000, DOI 10.1071/MF10302
   Hodgkinson JH, 2013, NCCARF C SYDN JUN 20
   Hodgkinson JH, 2013, C21041 ACARP CSIRO
   Howden M, 2010, GOLDF ESP REG CLIM V
   Howden SM, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P19691, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701890104
   Innes J., 2009, IUFRO World Series, V22, P135
   Joyce LA, 2009, ADAPTATION FORESTS P, P135
   Kasperski S, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P2076, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1212278110
   Kates RW, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P7156, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1115521109
   Kousky C., 2009, CLIMATE CHANGE RISK
   Lavenex S, 2009, J EUR PUBLIC POLICY, V16, P813, DOI 10.1080/13501760903087779
   Leishout H, 1996, RES WORK GROUP 2 AUS, P6
   Leith P, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P55, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0984-0
   Linnenluecke M, 2010, BUS SOC, V49, P477, DOI 10.1177/0007650310368814
   Linnenluecke MK, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.010
   Loechel B, 2012, 126964 CSIRO EP
   Loechel B, 2011, PILB REG MIN CLIM CH
   Loechel B, 2014, SURVEY AUSTR MINING
   Loechel B, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V119, P465, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0721-8
   Lough JM, 2011, MAR FRESHWATER RES, V62, P984, DOI 10.1071/MF10272
   Marshall NA, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12, DOI 10.5751/es-01940-120101
   Marshall N, 2013, ECOSYSTEMS, V16, P797, DOI 10.1007/s10021-013-9651-6
   Mitchell PJ, 2013, NEW PHYTOL, V197, P862, DOI [10.1111/nph.12064, 10.1111]
   Nelson R, 2010, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V13, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.09.007
   Nelson R, 2008, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V11, P588, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.06.005
   Network for Business Sustainability, 2011, MAN BUS RISKS OPP CH
   NSW Government, 2012, INQ AD WAT STOR NSW
   Nursey-Bray M, 2012, MAR POLICY, V36, P753, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.10.015
   Ogden AE, 2008, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V13, P833, DOI 10.1007/s11027-008-9144-7
   Palutikof JP, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.002
   Palutikof Jean., 2013, Climate Adaptation Futures
   Park SE, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.003
   Pearce A., 2011, MARINE HEAT WAVE W A, P40
   Pearce AF, 2013, J MARINE SYST, V111, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2012.10.009
   Pecl G., 2009, Rep. Dep. Clim. Change Dep. Clim. Change
   Pigot L, 2007, J CLIMATOL, V20, P2847
   Pinkard EA, 2010, ECOL MODEL, V221, P2828, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.08.017
   Pinkard EA, 2010, ADAPTATION CLIMATE C, P80
   Pitcher T, 2009, NATURE, V457, P658, DOI 10.1038/457658a
   PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2008, PRACT GUID RISK ASS
   QFCI, 2012, QUEENSL FLOODS COMM
   Reynolds M, 2007, J EXP BOT, V58, P177, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erl250
   Rio Tinto, 2013, PERF REL
   Rio Tinto, 2011, CARB DISCL PROJ INV
   Rio Tinto Coal Australia Pty Limited, 2011, RIO TINT AUSTR SUBM
   Risbey JS, 2009, MON WEATHER REV, V137, P3233, DOI 10.1175/2009MWR2861.1
   Select Carbon, 2012, BEST PRACT GUID TIMB, P25
   Semple K, 2013, J TROP FOR SCI, V25, P1
   Smale DA, 2013, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V280, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2012.2829
   Smith ADM, 2007, ICES J MAR SCI, V64, P633, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsm041
   Smith AH, 2007, FOREST PATHOL, V37, P361, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2007.00502.x
   Smith M., 2013, Assessing Climate Change Risk and Opportunities for Investors- Mining and Minerals Processing Sector
   Smith MS, 2011, PHILOS T R SOC A, V369, P196, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2010.0277
   Stokes C, 2010, ADAPTING AGRICULTURE TO CLIMATE CHANGE: PREPARING AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES FOR THE FUTURE, P1
   Stone C, 2013, HIST MANAGEMENT RESP, P45
   Suppiah R, 2007, AUST METEOROL MAG, V56, P131
   Tobin A, 2010, 11 J COOK U FISH RES
   Wardlaw T, 2005, 15 AUSTR PLANT PATH, P22
   Wayte SE, 2013, FISH RES, V142, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2012.07.009
   Wernberg T, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P78, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1627, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1627]
   White DA, 2009, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.039
   Wood MJ, 2008, FORESTRY, V81, P415, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpn005
NR 103
TC 52
Z9 54
U1 1
U2 54
PU SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
PI HEIDELBERG
PA TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
SN 1436-3798
EI 1436-378X
J9 REG ENVIRON CHANGE
JI Reg. Envir. Chang.
PD AUG
PY 2014
VL 14
IS 4
BP 1663
EP 1678
DI 10.1007/s10113-014-0618-8
PG 16
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA AM3EX
UT WOS:000339736700030
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Reverter, A
   Porto-Neto, LR
   Fortes, MRS
   Kasarapu, P
   de Cara, MAR
   Burrow, HM
   Lehnert, SA
AF Reverter, A.
   Porto-Neto, L. R.
   Fortes, M. R. S.
   Kasarapu, P.
   de Cara, M. A. R.
   Burrow, H. M.
   Lehnert, S. A.
TI Genomic inbreeding depression for climatic adaptation of tropical beef
   cattle
SO JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE beef cattle; Bos indicus; genomic relationship matrix; inbreeding
   depression
ID FEED-INTAKE; GENE; TRAITS; HOMOZYGOSITY; GROWTH; RUNS; POLYMORPHISM;
   POPULATIONS; PREDICTION; PEDIGREE
AB Inbreeding has the potential to negatively impact animal performance. Strategies to monitor and mitigate inbreeding depression require that it can be accurately estimated. Here, we used genomewide SNP data to explore 3 alternative measures of genomic inbreeding: the diagonal elements of the genomic relationship matrix (FGRM), the proportion of homozygous SNP (FHOM), and the proportion of the genome covered by runs of homozygosity (FROH). We used 2,111 Brahman (BR) and 2,550 Tropical Composite (TC) cattle with phenotypes recorded for 10 traits of relevance to tropical adaptation. We further explored 3 marker densities ranging from a high-density chip (729,068 SNP), a medium-density chip (71,726 SNP) specifically designed for Bos indicus cattle, and a low-density chip (18,860 SNP) associated with the measures of inbreeding. Measures of FGRM were highly correlated across the 3 SNP densities and negatively correlated with FHOM and FROH in the BR population. In both populations, there was a strong positive correlation for each measure of inbreeding across the 3 SNP panels. We found significant (P < 0.01) inbreeding depression for various traits, particularly when using the highest-density SNP chip in the BR population, where inbreeding was negatively associated with coat color and coat type such that inbred animals presented shorter, slicker, and lighter coats. Based on FGRM using the medium-density chip, we found that a 1% increase in inbreeding in the BR and TC populations was associated with a decrease of 0.514 and 0.579 kg BW, respectively, in yearlings. In the TC population, a 1% increase in FHOM was associated with a decrease in BCS of -0.636% (P < 0.001). The low-density chip, comprising SNP associated with inbreeding, captured genes, and regions with pleiotropic effects (P < 0.001). However, it did not improve our ability to identify inbreeding depression, relative to the use of higher-density panels. We conclude that where heterogeneous populations are present, such as in tropical environments where composite animals abound, measures of inbreeding that do not depend on allele frequencies, such as FHOM and FROH, are preferable for estimating genomic inbreeding. Finally, the sustainable intensification of livestock systems in tropical regions will rely on genetic safeguards to ensure that productivity is improved while also adapting animals to cope with climate change. The results of this study are a step toward achieving that goal.
C1 [Reverter, A.; Porto-Neto, L. R.; Kasarapu, P.; Lehnert, S. A.] CSIRO Agr & Food, Queensland Biosci Precinct, 306 Carmody Rd, Brisbane, Qld 4067, Australia.
   [Fortes, M. R. S.] Univ Queensland, Sch Chem & Mol Biosci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.
   [de Cara, M. A. R.] Univ Paul Valery Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ctr Ecol Fonct & Evolut,UMR 5175,EPHE, Montpellier, France.
   [Burrow, H. M.] Univ New England, UNE Business Sch, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
C3 Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO);
   University of Queensland; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
   (CNRS); CNRS - Institute of Ecology & Environment (INEE); Universite
   PSL; Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes (EPHE); Institut Agro; Montpellier
   SupAgro; CIRAD; Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement (IRD);
   Universite Paul-Valery; Universite de Montpellier; University of New
   England
RP Reverter, A (corresponding author), CSIRO Agr & Food, Queensland Biosci Precinct, 306 Carmody Rd, Brisbane, Qld 4067, Australia.
EM tony.reverter-gomez@csiro.au
RI Fortes, Marina/AAN-6815-2020; Reverter-Gomez, Toni/C-9699-2013;
   Porto-Neto, Laercio/D-2594-2012; de Cara, Angeles/F-9012-2015; Lehnert,
   Sigrid/A-3676-2013
OI Kasarapu, Parthan/0000-0002-8317-3649; Reverter-Gomez,
   Toni/0000-0002-4681-9404; Porto-Neto, Laercio/0000-0002-3536-8265; de
   Cara, Angeles/0000-0002-0377-9502; Lehnert, Sigrid/0000-0003-4891-9094;
   Burrow, Heather/0000-0002-7989-0426
CR Ayroles JF, 2009, CONSERV BIOL, V23, P920, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01186.x
   Bastin BC, 2014, ANIM GENET, V45, P439, DOI 10.1111/age.12134
   Bjelland DW, 2013, J DAIRY SCI, V96, P4697, DOI 10.3168/jds.2012-6435
   Bolormaa S, 2013, J ANIM SCI, V91, P3088, DOI 10.2527/jas.2012-5827
   Bolormaa S, 2015, GENET SEL EVOL, V47, DOI 10.1186/s12711-015-0114-8
   Bolormaa S, 2014, PLOS GENET, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004198
   Browning SR, 2010, AM J HUM GENET, V86, P526, DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.02.021
   Burrow HM, 1998, LIVEST PROD SCI, V55, P227, DOI 10.1016/S0301-6226(98)00139-0
   Charlesworth D, 2009, NAT REV GENET, V10, P783, DOI 10.1038/nrg2664
   de los Campos G, 2015, PLOS GENET, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005048
   Silva RMD, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0169860
   Dias MM, 2017, GENET MOL RES, V16, DOI 10.4238/gmr16019522
   Dikmen S, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069202
   Ferencakovic M, 2013, J ANIM BREED GENET, V130, P286, DOI 10.1111/jbg.12012
   Ferencakovic M, 2013, GENET SEL EVOL, V45, DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-45-42
   García C, 2012, GENETICS, V192, P161, DOI 10.1534/genetics.112.142687
   Gibson G, 2012, NAT REV GENET, V13, P135, DOI 10.1038/nrg3118
   Griffith GR, 2015, ANIM PROD SCI, V55, P133, DOI 10.1071/AN13351
   Hay EH, 2017, J ANIM SCI, V95, P1467, DOI 10.2527/jas.2016.1355
   Hayashi KG, 2017, REPROD BIOL ENDOCRIN, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12958-017-0237-6
   Heffernan C, 2013, ANIM HEALTH RES REV, V14, P125, DOI 10.1017/S1466252313000078
   Howard JT, 2015, BMC GENOMICS, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-2001-7
   Keller MC, 2011, GENETICS, V189, P237, DOI 10.1534/genetics.111.130922
   Kristensen TN, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.014
   Leroy G, 2014, ANIM GENET, V45, P618, DOI 10.1111/age.12178
   Lindholm-Perry AK, 2012, ANIM GENET, V43, P216, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02232.x
   Lippert C, 2013, SCI REP-UK, V3, DOI 10.1038/srep01815
   Lo A, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P13892, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1518285112
   Long TAF, 2013, AM NAT, V181, P532, DOI 10.1086/669675
   Matukumalli LK, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0005350
   Neto LRP, 2012, ANIM GENET, V43, P785, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2012.02330.x
   Nicolae DL, 2010, PLOS GENET, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000888
   Paige KN, 2010, BIOSCIENCE, V60, P267, DOI 10.1525/bio.2010.60.4.5
   Patel SM, 2015, GENOM DATA, V5, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.gdata.2015.05.015
   Pereira RJ, 2016, J ANIM BREED GENET, V133, P523, DOI 10.1111/jbg.12219
   Pérez-Enciso M, 2015, GENET SEL EVOL, V47, DOI 10.1186/s12711-015-0117-5
   Pérez-Enciso M, 2011, BMC BIOINFORMATICS, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-12-202
   Peripolli E, 2017, ANIM GENET, V48, P255, DOI 10.1111/age.12526
   Porto-Neto LR, 2015, GENET SEL EVOL, V47, DOI 10.1186/s12711-015-0162-0
   Porto-Neto LR, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0113284
   Pryce JE, 2014, GENET SEL EVOL, V46, DOI 10.1186/s12711-014-0071-7
   Ramayo-Caldas Y, 2014, J ANIM SCI, V92, P2832, DOI 10.2527/jas.2013-7484
   Santana ML, 2012, J ANIM SCI, V90, P99, DOI 10.2527/jas.2011-4079
   Santana ML, 2010, LIVEST SCI, V131, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.04.003
   Saura M, 2015, GENET SEL EVOL, V47, DOI 10.1186/s12711-014-0081-5
   Sugimoto M, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P19495, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1309307110
   Szpiech ZA, 2013, AM J HUM GENET, V93, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.05.003
   VanRaden PM, 2008, J DAIRY SCI, V91, P4414, DOI 10.3168/jds.2007-0980
   Whitlock MC, 2005, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V18, P1368, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00917.x
   Yun L, 2014, EVOLUTION, V68, P3599, DOI 10.1111/evo.12527
   Zhang QQ, 2015, BMC GENET, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12863-015-0227-7
   Zhao SH, 2004, GENOMICS, V84, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.ygeno.2004.02.006
   Zimin AV, 2009, GENOME BIOL, V10, DOI 10.1186/gb-2009-10-4-r42
NR 53
TC 21
Z9 24
U1 1
U2 37
PU OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
PI CARY
PA JOURNALS DEPT, 2001 EVANS RD, CARY, NC 27513 USA
SN 0021-8812
EI 1525-3163
J9 J ANIM SCI
JI J. Anim. Sci.
PD SEP
PY 2017
VL 95
IS 9
BP 3809
EP 3821
DI 10.2527/jas.2017.1643
PG 13
WC Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA FH0FD
UT WOS:000410813900002
PM 28992001
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Quarshie, PT
   Abdulai, AR
   Duncan, E
   Bahadur, KK
   Roth, R
   Sneyd, A
   Fraser, EDG
AF Quarshie, Philip Tetteh
   Abdulai, Abdul-Rahim
   Duncan, Emily
   Bahadur, K. C. Krishna
   Roth, Robin
   Sneyd, Adam
   Fraser, Evan D. G.
TI Myth or reality? The Digitalization of Climate-Smart Agriculture (DCSA)
   practices in smallholding agriculture in the Bono East Region of Ghana
SO CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate adaptation; Climate-smart agriculture; Digital agriculture
   technologies; Digital agriculture services; Smallholder farmers;
   Sub-Saharan Africa
ID BIG DATA; FOOD SYSTEMS; AFRICA; TECHNOLOGIES; OPPORTUNITIES;
   VULNERABILITY; INFORMATION; CHALLENGES; ADAPTATION; OUTCOMES
AB Digitalization of Climate-Smart Agriculture practices leverages the power of digital agriculture tools/services (DATs) of any form (hardware, software, or data) in Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) practices to promote enhanced adaptation, GHGs emissions mitigation and increase productivity for smallholding agriculture. This research used a mixture of participatory and learning approaches with an emphasis on Expert Interviews and a Large-scale Household Survey involving 1219 farmers in the Bono East of Ghana to assess the awareness and utilization of DATs in smallholder farmers' CSA practices. Precisely, we assess farmers' engagement with Digital Agriculture Services (DAS) and DAT such as; TVs, Radios, Mobile phones/Tablets, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV)/Drones, Soil Sensor, Moisture Meters, Rain Gauges, Farm Management Software, Smartphone Applications, and Field Thermometers. The research suggests that the ubiquity of TVs, Radios, and feature phones in rural communities makes these tools the most used devices in farmers' climate-smart practices. However, the level of awareness, availability, accessibility, and utilization of complex tools such as UAVs and simpler tools such as soil sensors, moisture meters, field thermometers, rain gauges, smartphone applications (Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, etc.), and farm management software is minimal among rural farmers. The DAS facilitating farmers' climate-smart practices is limited to Digital Agroadvisory Purposes (digital extension), Agri-Digital Finance, and Digital Procurement services, while engagement with other DAS, such as Agri E-Commerce which facilitates most CSA Institution/Market Smart practice, is non-existing in rural communities. In addition, the Digitalization of Climate-Smart Agriculture, in its present form, is only limited to a few CSA practices and DATs engagement among smallholders owing to unmet training and information needs for most Climate-Smart Agriculture practices and interventions. Challenges such as DATs' unavailability, inaccessibility, high cost, high (digital)illiteracy, and inadequate extension support for the digitalization of CSA practices limit uptake. The study proposes increased capacity building for smallholders on CSA practice and interventions. Likewise, a strong public-private partnership across multiple scales is needed to stimulate needed investment to enhance farmers' access to affordable, easy-to-use, and tailor-made DATs while recognizing the power dependence and inequalities these digital tools may unleash in rural communities. Finally, increasing sensitization on DAT's use and benefits in rural communities and the larger population is critical to enhancing the widespread Digitalization of Climate-Smart Agriculture practices in smallholding agriculture.
C1 [Quarshie, Philip Tetteh; Abdulai, Abdul-Rahim; Duncan, Emily; Bahadur, K. C. Krishna; Roth, Robin; Fraser, Evan D. G.] Univ Guelph, Dept Geog Environm & Geomat, Guelph, ON, Canada.
   [Quarshie, Philip Tetteh] Univ Guelph, Guelph Inst Dev Studies, Guelph, ON, Canada.
   [Quarshie, Philip Tetteh] Global Agribusiness Solut INC, Brantford, ON, Canada.
   [Sneyd, Adam] Univ Guelph, Dept Polit Sci, Guelph, ON, Canada.
   [Abdulai, Abdul-Rahim; Fraser, Evan D. G.] Univ Guelph, Arrell Food Inst, Guelph, ON, Canada.
   [Quarshie, Philip Tetteh] 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, ON N1H 2W1, Canada.
C3 University of Guelph; University of Guelph; University of Guelph;
   University of Guelph
RP Quarshie, PT (corresponding author), 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, ON N1H 2W1, Canada.
EM pquarshi@uoguelph.ca
RI Fraser, Evan/F-7967-2011; Duncan, Emily/KLZ-9441-2024
FU Canada First Research Excellence Fund; Canada Research Chairs Program
FX PTQ receives funding from the Canada First Research Excellence Fund and
   the Canada Research Chairs Program.
CR Abdulai A-R., 2022, DIGITALIZATION AGR U
   Abdulai AR, 2023, AGR FOOD SECUR, V12, DOI 10.1186/s40066-023-00416-6
   Abdulai AR, 2022, J DEV STUD, V58, P1588, DOI 10.1080/00220388.2022.2032673
   Abraham OA., 2022, J Res Sci Technol, V3, P24
   Aggarwal PK, 2018, ECOL SOC, V23, DOI 10.5751/ES-09844-230114
   Antwi-Agyei P, 2021, ENVIRON DEV, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100580
   Antwi-Agyei P, 2018, CLIM RISK MANAG, V19, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2017.11.003
   Antwi-Agyei P, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P213, DOI 10.1007/s10113-016-0993-4
   Arathoon L., 2021, COVID-19: Accelerating the use of digital agriculture
   Asante FA, 2015, CLIMATE, V3, P78, DOI 10.3390/cli3010078
   Asare-Nuamah P, 2021, ENVIRON DEV, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2021.100680
   Ayre M, 2019, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V90-91, DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2019.05.001
   Barbier EB, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P623, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0155-4
   Batchelor S., 2014, Is there a role for Mobiles to support Sustainable Agriculture in Africa?
   Bellon-Maurel Veronique, 2016, Geoeconomie, V80, P159, DOI DOI 10.3917/GEOEC.080.0159
   Blok V, 2018, ETHICS POLICY ENV, V21, P246, DOI 10.1080/21550085.2018.1509491
   Bogoviz Aleksei V., 2022, Smart Innovation in Agriculture. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (264), P13, DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-7633-8_2
   Bronson K, 2019, CAN J COMMUN, V44, P63, DOI 10.22230/cjc.2019v44n2a3489
   Chamberlin J., 2007, Defining Smallholder Agriculture in Ghana: Who Are Smallholders, What Do They Do and How Are They Linked With Markets?
   Chassin L., 2020, Mobile for Development
   Climate Smart Agriculture, 2016, Successes in Africa.
   Coggins S, 2022, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100577
   Creswell J. W., 2018, Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
   Creswell JW., 2017, DESIGNING CONDUCTING
   Di Silvestre ML, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V93, P483, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.068
   Dinesh D., 2019, SUMMARY 5 GLOBAL SCI
   Diouf NS, 2020, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/atmos11101127
   Dosi G., 1992, Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, V100, P219
   Eastwood C, 2017, J RURAL STUD, V49, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.008
   Eastwood C, 2019, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V90-91, DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2019.04.004
   Edwards D., 2016, Plant Genomics and Climate Change, P173
   Essegbey G.O., 2015, Working Paper No 139
   Fabregas R, 2019, SCIENCE, V366, P1328, DOI 10.1126/science.aay3038
   Ferdinand T., 2021, BLUEPRINT DIGITAL CL, DOI [10.46830/wriwp.20.00103, DOI 10.46830/WRIWP.20.00103]
   Ferdinand T, 2021, To tackle food insecurity, invest in digital climate services for agriculture
   Fielke SJ, 2019, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V90-91, DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2019.04.002
   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & the International Telecommunication Union, 2022, Status of digital agriculture in 47 sub-Saharan African countries, DOI [10.4060/cb7943-n, DOI 10.4060/CB7943-N]
   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (UN-FAO), 2009, Food Security and Agricultural Mitigation in Developing Countries: Options for Capturing Synergies, P2
   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (UN-FAO), 2009, Harvesting Agriculture's Multiple Benefits: Mitigation, Adaptation, Development and Food Security, P3
   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (UN-FAO), 2010, Agriculture: Policies, Practices and Financing for Food Security, Adaptation and Mitigation, V4
   Gebbers R, 2010, SCIENCE, V327, P828, DOI 10.1126/science.1183899
   GMet, 2022, District Fact Sheet
   Government of Ghana [GoG], 2021, Ghana National E-Agriculture Policy Draft Working Paper
   Government of Ghana (GoG), 2013, GHAN NAT CLIM CHANG
   Government of Ghana [GoG], 2015, Ghana's Third National Communication Report to the UNFCCC. 2015 Climate Change Report
   Government of Ghana-Ministry of Environment Science Technology and Innovation (GoG-MESTI), 2013, Ghana National Climate Change Policy
   GSM Association, 2020, DIG AGR MAPS 2020 ST
   GSMA, 2019, GSMA AgriTech: Digital disruption of the agricultural sector in Sub-Saharan Africa
   GSMA, 2020, The mobile economy Sub-Saharan Africa 2020
   GSS, 2015, Ghana Poverty Mapping Report, DOI DOI 10.1186/S12913-014-0637-7
   Jakku E, 2019, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V90-91, DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2018.11.002
   Janc K, 2019, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V90-91, DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2019.100309
   Kenou C., 2016, Supporting agricultural extension towards Climate-Smart Agriculture: An overview of existing tools, P28
   Keogh M., 2016, The Implications of Digital Agriculture and Big Data for Australian Agriculture: April 2016
   Khatri-Chhetri A, 2017, AGR SYST, V151, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.10.005
   Kim J., 2020, Scaling up disruptive agricultural technologies in Africa, DOI [10.1596/978-1-4648-1522-5, DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-1522-5]
   Klerkx L, 2019, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V90-91, DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315
   Klutse NAB, 2020, SN APPL SCI, V2, DOI 10.1007/s42452-020-3095-3
   Knierim A, 2019, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V90-91, DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2019.100314
   Lajoie-O'Malley A, 2020, ECOSYST SERV, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101183
   Laws S, 2011, Research for Development, DOI [10.4135/9781849209786, DOI 10.4135/9781849209786]
   Leonard Emma., 2017, Accelerating precision agriculture to decision agriculture: Enabling digital agriculture in Australia
   Leviäkangas P, 2016, TECHNOL SOC, V47, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.07.001
   McCampbell M, 2023, J AGRIC EDUC EXT, V29, P29, DOI 10.1080/1389224X.2021.1984955
   Mechiche-Alami A, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-59943-y
   Minia Z, 2008, GHANA CLIMATE CHANGE, P2
   Ministry of Food and Agriculture [MoFA], 2017, PLANT FOOD JOBS STRA
   Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MoFA), 2021, Agriculture Production in Ghana, Fact and Figures Sheet
   Neufeldt H., 2013, AGR FOOD SECURITY, V2, P12, DOI [DOI 10.1186/2048-7010-2-12, 10.1186/2048-7010-2-12]
   Niang I, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1199
   Nwali P.N., 2022, Sci. Technol., V3, P8
   Partey S.T., 2019, CCAFS Info Note
   Partey ST, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V187, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.199
   Phatty-Jobe A., 2020, Digital Agriculture Maps 2020 State of the Sector in Low and MiddleIncome Countries
   Phillips S., 2014, Better Crops with Plant Food, V98, P4
   Poppe KJ, 2013, EUROCHOICES, V12, P60, DOI 10.1111/1746-692X.12022
   Priebe J., 2021, Tech. Rep.
   Priebe J., 2022, Data-driven advisory services for climate-smart smallholder agriculture, GSMA Agritech Programme
   Quarshie P.T., 2023, Climate Resilience and Sustainability, Ve253
   Quarshie P.T., 2021, The Conversation
   Quarshie PT, 2023, GEOGR SUSTAIN, V4, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.geosus.2023.02.002
   Quarshie PT, 2022, FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S, V6, DOI 10.3389/fsufs.2022.804984
   Quarshie PT, 2022, S AFR GEOGR J, V104, P251, DOI 10.1080/03736245.2021.1963316
   Rao NH, 2018, P INDIAN NATL SCI AC, V84, P625, DOI 10.16943/ptinsa/2018/49342
   Regan A, 2019, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V90-91, DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2019.02.003
   Reghunadhan R, 2020, STUD BIG DATA, V63, P113, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-9177-4_6
   Relf-Eckstein JE, 2019, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V90-91, DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2019.100307
   Rijswijk K, 2019, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V90-91, DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2019.100313
   Rogers E.M., 2003, Diffusion of Innovations, V5th
   Rose DC, 2018, FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S, V2, DOI 10.3389/fsufs.2018.00087
   Rossel RAV, 2016, AGR SYST, V148, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.07.001
   Rotz S, 2019, J RURAL STUD, V68, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.023
   Rotz S, 2019, SOCIOL RURALIS, V59, P203, DOI 10.1111/soru.12233
   RUTTAN VW, 1984, J DEV STUD, V20, P203, DOI 10.1080/00220388408421914
   Scheyvens R., 2014, Development Field Work: A Practical Guide, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781473921801
   Sennuga S.O., 2020, Eur. J. Train. Dev. Stud., V7, P1
   Sennuga S.O., 2020, International Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development Studies, V7, P27
   Shepherd M, 2020, J SCI FOOD AGR, V100, P5083, DOI 10.1002/jsfa.9346
   Simelton E, 2021, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/agriculture11100953
   Smith MJ, 2020, ANIM PROD SCI, V60, P46, DOI 10.1071/AN18522
   Stanturf J.A., 2011, Ghana Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessment
   Sterne J.A. C., 2009, META ANAL STATA UPDA
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Symeonaki EG, 2019, SPRING EARTH SYST SC, P147, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-02312-6_9
   Teye ES, 2022, S AFR GEOGR J, V104, P231, DOI 10.1080/03736245.2021.1962395
   Trisos C H., 2022, Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
   Vik J, 2019, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V90-91, DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2019.100305
   Wassmann R, 2019, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V23, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.02.003
   Weersink A, 2018, ANNU REV RESOUR ECON, V10, P19, DOI 10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053654
   Wolf SA, 1996, AM J AGR ECON, V78, P1269, DOI 10.2307/1243505
   Wolfert S., 2021, Navigating the Twilight Zone: Pathways Towards Digital Transformation of Food Systems, DOI [10.18174/552346, DOI 10.18174/552346]
   Wolfert S, 2017, AGR SYST, V153, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023
   Wyche S, 2016, INFORM TECHNOL DEV, V22, P320, DOI 10.1080/02681102.2015.1048184
   Yoo, 2010, Computing in Everyday Life: A Call for Research on Experiential Computing, P34
   Zougmoré RB, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13084305
NR 115
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 24
U2 61
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0963
J9 CLIM RISK MANAG
JI CLIM. RISK MANAG.
PY 2023
VL 42
AR 100553
DI 10.1016/j.crm.2023.100553
EA SEP 2023
PG 21
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA S6SQ8
UT WOS:001072450800001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wihlborg, M
   Sorensen, J
   Olsson, JA
AF Wihlborg, M.
   Sorensen, J.
   Olsson, J. Alkan
TI Assessment of barriers and drivers for implementation of blue-green
   solutions in Swedish municipalities
SO JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Blue-green solutions; Sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS); Urban
   planning; Transition theory; Multi-level perspective
ID URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT; FLOOD-RISK-MANAGEMENT; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT;
   CLIMATE ADAPTATION; GOVERNANCE; TRANSITION; SUPPORT; INFRASTRUCTURE;
   VULNERABILITY; PERSPECTIVE
AB Due to increased urbanisation, and climate change, there have been calls for a more sustainable management of stormwater. Blue-green measures have been recognised as a sustainable solution and a necessary complement to pipe-bound approaches. The aim of this study is to identify barriers and drivers in the implementation of blue-green measures in a Swedish context, to increase the understanding of how they could be implemented in a more successful manner. The study is qualitative and based on semi-structured interviews. Through the lens of transition theory, barriers and drivers for blue-green measures were identified and they give an updated picture of Swedish urban stormwater management. Many factors encourage municipal actors to implement blue-green solutions, such as increased need for recreation, protection of biodiversity and climate change. Identified barriers are found within the municipal stormwater management it-self, but can also be found outside the storm water management structure, such as lack of knowledge among politicians, officials, exploiters and civilians, fragmented roles and responsibilities in general, as well as uncertainty of the effects and cost of new alternatives. The study has three main findings; Several barriers were mentioned by most of the interviewees clearly show that a wide range of changes are needed to alter the current stormwater management regime; Niche innovations are often put forward as a way to enhance socio-technical transition, but this study is that such an approach is oversimplified instead elaborated suggestions for an alteration of urban stormwater management is given, both with top-down and bottom-up perspective. For the success of blue-green solutions, educational efforts are important at different levels in the planning, building and maintenance process of blue-green solutions. Therefore, employees must have a good general knowledge of both blue and green issues as well as having contacts in the different sectors of the municipality. To conclude we argue that a transition can not only be induced by pilot projects but requires change in legal structures as well as altered financing models for blue-green solutions. Moreover, the ongoing, but slow, change should therefor probably be interpreted as a shift to a new regime, but rather an evolutionary transition where new approaches are combined with traditional, pipe-bound solutions.
C1 [Wihlborg, M.; Olsson, J. Alkan] Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Res CEC, Lund, Sweden.
   [Sorensen, J.] Lund Univ, Water Resources Engn, Lund, Sweden.
C3 Lund University; Lund University
RP Sorensen, J (corresponding author), Lund Univ, Div Water Resources Engn, Fac Engn LTH, POB 118, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden.
EM johanna.sorensen@tvrl.lth.se
RI Sörensen, Johanna/AAG-3189-2019
OI Sorensen, Johanna Lykke/0000-0002-2312-4917
FU Svenska Forskningsradet Formas Grant [2015-00149, 2016-00334]; Formas
   [2016-00334, 2015-00149] Funding Source: Formas
FX Svenska Forskningsradet Formas Grant numbers: 2015-00149, 2016-00334.
CR [Anonymous], P 11 INT C URB DRAIN
   [Anonymous], KOB KLIM
   [Anonymous], 2 INT C SUST TRANS
   [Anonymous], J WATER RESOUR PLANN
   [Anonymous], REGERINGENS PROPOSIT
   [Anonymous], VITMARKER TVISTEGSDI
   [Anonymous], CENT CLEAN AIR POLIC
   [Anonymous], 2013, SUBURB SUSTAIN
   [Anonymous], BOST SKAN 2017
   [Anonymous], ISEE 2012 C EC EC RI
   [Anonymous], J WATER MANAGEMENT R
   [Anonymous], TRANSIT MANAG PUBLIC
   [Anonymous], 201450 SOU
   [Anonymous], VA TAX SWWA WEBP FIN
   [Anonymous], STARKT ARBETE ANPASS
   [Anonymous], REG SKRIV 2017 18 23
   [Anonymous], BANK GREEN LOOK GREE
   [Anonymous], REGERINGEN SATSAR VA
   [Anonymous], 2016, J WATER MANAG RES
   [Anonymous], KLIMATILPASNINGSPORT
   [Anonymous], IMPLEMENTATION EUROP
   [Anonymous], TILLSANUNANS GOR VI
   [Anonymous], LANGSIKTIGT HALLBAR
   [Anonymous], DRIVKRAFTER HALLBAR
   [Anonymous], 2015, Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities: final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on 'Nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities, DOI DOI 10.2777/765301
   [Anonymous], MANGF YTOR KLIM AV B
   [Anonymous], URBAN WATER J
   [Anonymous], 2014900 SFS
   [Anonymous], 201618 SWED NAT BOAR
   [Anonymous], HDB KLIMATANPASSAD V
   [Anonymous], 2012, INT J SUSTAIN DEV, DOI DOI 10.1504/IJSD.2012.044031
   Artmann M., 2017, ECOL INDIC, P1, DOI [10.1016/j.ecolind, DOI 10.1016/J.ECOLIND]
   Bates B.C., 2008, Climate Change and Water, Technical Paper of the Intergovern-Mental Panel on Climate Change, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JMB.2010.08.039
   Bettini Y, 2015, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V94, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.06.002
   Brears R.C., 2018, Blue and green cities, P43, DOI [10.1057/978-1-137-59258-32, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-59258-32, 10.1057/978-1-137-59258-3_2, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-59258-3_2]
   Brown RR, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P839, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.028
   Brown RR, 2008, AUSTRALAS J WAT RESO, V12, P73, DOI 10.1080/13241583.2008.11465336
   Brown RR, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P653, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.022
   Cettner A, 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V146, P29, DOI [10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.024, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.0]
   Cettner A, 2013, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V56, P786, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2012.706216
   Cettner A, 2012, J URBAN TECHNOL, V19, P25, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2012.673058
   Dreiseitl H., 2015, J. Urban Regen. Renew, V8, P161
   Farrelly M, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P721, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.007
   Flowerdew R., 2005, METHODS HUMAN GEOGRA, V2nd
   Geels FW, 2007, RES POLICY, V36, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Geels FW, 2011, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V1, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
   Geels FW, 2002, RES POLICY, V31, P1257, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Haghighatafshar S, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V207, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.018
   Halbe J, 2018, J HYDROL, V559, P984, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.001
   de Haan J, 2011, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V78, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.10.008
   Hansen R, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V96, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.042
   Holtz G, 2008, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V75, P623, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2007.02.010
   Hordijk M, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P130, DOI 10.1177/0956247813519044
   Jha AK, 2012, CITIES AND FLOODING: A GUIDE TO INTEGRATED URBAN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8866-2
   Jia H., 2016, Hydrolink, V4, P100
   Keesstra S, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V610, P997, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.077
   Kennedy S., 2011, SOCIAL ENV ACCOUNTAB, V31, P139, DOI DOI 10.1080/0969160X.2011
   Kvale S., 2009, KVALITATIVA FORSKNIN
   Lerer SM, 2015, WATER-SUI, V7, P993, DOI 10.3390/w7030993
   Li L, 2018, CITIES, V74, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.013
   Loftus A.C., 2011, ADAPTING URBAN WATER
   Loorbach D., 2007, Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development
   Lund D. H., 2014, SAMARBEJDSDREVET INN
   Maksimovic Cedoyotros., 2015, RETHINKING INFRASTRU, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-06275-4
   McCormick K, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.003
   Meene S. J. van de, 2009, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, V45, P1448, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00377.x
   Mguni P, 2015, WATER POLICY, V17, P126, DOI 10.2166/wp.2014.047
   Nielsen SB, 2016, INT J INNOV SUSTAIN, V10, P103, DOI 10.1504/IJISD.2016.075532
   Ossa-Moreno J, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V28, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.10.002
   Pahl-Wostl C., 2015, WATER GOVERNANCE FAC, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-21855-7
   Pahl-Wostl C., 2008, Adaptive and Integrated Water Management: Coping with Complexity and Uncertainty
   Qiao XJ, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V196, P943, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.049
   Scott W.R., 1995, The Institutional Construction of Organizations, P11
   Semadeni-Davies A, 2008, J HYDROL, V350, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.006
   Sjöman JD, 2014, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V13, P304, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.10.007
   Smith A, 2005, RES POLICY, V34, P1491, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
   SOU, 2017, 201742 SOU
   Stahre P., 2008, BLUE GREEN FINGERPRI
   Storbjörk S, 2010, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V12, P235, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2010.505414
   Tratalos J, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V83, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.05.003
   van de Meene SJ, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P1117, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.003
   van der Brugge R, 2005, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V5, P164, DOI 10.1007/s10113-004-0086-7
   van der Jagt APN, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P264, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.013
   van Herk S, 2011, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V4, P306, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01113.x
   van Herk S, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P543, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.006
   Villarreal EL, 2004, ECOL ENG, V22, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.06.007
   Voskamp IM, 2015, BUILD ENVIRON, V83, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.07.018
   Werbeloff L, 2011, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V64, P2362, DOI 10.2166/wst.2011.774
   Winz I, 2014, URBAN WATER J, V11, P497, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2013.832777
NR 89
TC 74
Z9 77
U1 7
U2 131
PU ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI LONDON
PA 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON NW1 7DX, ENGLAND
SN 0301-4797
EI 1095-8630
J9 J ENVIRON MANAGE
JI J. Environ. Manage.
PD MAR 1
PY 2019
VL 233
BP 706
EP 718
DI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.018
PG 13
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA HM5ON
UT WOS:000459525100071
PM 30641419
OA Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Xin, QC
AF Xin, Qinchuan
TI A risk-benefit model to simulate vegetation spring onset in response to
   multi-decadal climate variability: Theoretical basis and applications
   from the field to the Northern Hemisphere
SO AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Growing degree-day; Growing production-day; Phenology; Ecosystem;
   Climate change; Photosynthesis
ID LAND-SURFACE PHENOLOGY; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; CARBON-DIOXIDE;
   GREEN-UP; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; SOIL-TEMPERATURE; TIBETAN PLATEAU;
   WOODY-PLANTS; LEAF; SATELLITE
AB Vegetation spring onset regulates canopy photosynthetic activities and subsequent ecosystem processes, thereby influencing the complex interactions between the biosphere and the atmosphere. Robust models that predict the timing of vegetation spring onsets are required to account for the ecosystem response and adaption to climate variability. Here, a risk-benefit model is proposed to account for the fundamental tradeoff underlying plant leafing strategies: earlier timing of leaf-out events leads to greater vegetative carbon gain but higher risks associated with hazard damages. The proposed model named the Growing Production-Day (GPD) model uses the cumulative productivity of a hypothetical reference vegetation cover as the overall benefit and predicts the events of vegetation spring onset when a certain threshold that vegetation invests to mitigate potential hazard damages is reached. The daily canopy photosynthesis of the hypothetical reference vegetation cover is simulated by a two-leaf canopy model, which considers sunlit and shaded leaves within a canopy separately and accounts for the biogeochemical processes of canopy radiative transfer, leaf photosynthesis, leaf conductance, leaf transpiration, and soil evaporation. When validated against measurements from available flux tower sites of deciduous broadleaf forests, the two-leaf canopy model accurately simulated daily canopy photosynthesis and evapotranspiration rates, indicated by significant correlations (R-2 = 0.787 and 0.745 for gross primary production and latent heat, respectively) and low root-mean-square errors (RMSE = 2.25 gC m(2) day(-1) for gross primary production and 21.53 W m(-2) for latent heat, respectively) between the observed and modeled values. Based on the two-leaf canopy model, the GPD model predicted the dates of spring onsets accurately for three studied biomes (RMSE = 9.10, 5.54, and 12.76 days for evergreen needleleaf forests, deciduous broadleaf forests, and grasslands, respectively) as derived from the flux tower data. In addition, the GPD model could simulate the long-term interannual variation of species-level leaf onset dates as obtained from in-situ observations, and capture the spatiotemporal patterns of multi-decadal variation of vegetation spring onsets across the Northern Hemisphere as derived from satellite data. Although the GPD model requires further refinements, it shows promises with respect to simulating vegetation spring onset in response to multirdecadal climate variability. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Xin, Qinchuan] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Geog & Planning, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China.
   [Xin, Qinchuan] Tsinghua Univ, Ctr Earth Syst Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.
C3 Sun Yat Sen University; Tsinghua University
RP Xin, QC (corresponding author), Sun Yat Sen Univ, Earth & Environm Bldg 0107, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China.
EM xqcchina@gmail.com
RI Xin, Qinchuan/O-3276-2014
OI Xin, Qinchuan/0000-0003-1146-4874
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41401484, 41171308]
FX The author thanks the researchers and investigators involved in the data
   collection and analysis at the AmeriFlux sites and the Harvard Forest
   site. The author gratefully thanks Geli Zhang and Jinwei Dong from the
   University of Oklahoma for providing a satellite-based dataset of
   vegetation spring onset dates. Helpful discussions with Peng Gong and
   Yali Si from Tsinghua University, Jiancheng Shi from the Chinese Academy
   of Sciences, Xiaoping Liu from Sun Yat-sen University, and Mark Broich
   from the University of New South Wales contributed to the paper. This
   research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (grant no. 41401484 and 41171308). The author also thanks
   anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.
CR Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
   Arora VK, 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V11, P39, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00890.x
   Badeck FW, 2004, NEW PHYTOL, V162, P295, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01059.x
   Baldocchi D, 2001, B AM METEOROL SOC, V82, P2415, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<2415:FANTTS>2.3.CO;2
   Baldocchi DD, 2005, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V49, P377, DOI 10.1007/s00484-005-0256-4
   BALDOCCHI DD, 1985, J APPL ECOL, V22, P539, DOI 10.2307/2403184
   Ball J.T., 1987, Prog. Photosynth. Res., P221, DOI [10.1007/978-94-017-0519-6_48, 10.1007/978-94-017-0519, 10.1007/978-94-017-0519-648, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-0519-6_48]
   Blanken PD, 2009, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V95, P61, DOI 10.1007/s10533-009-9325-9
   Bolstad PV, 2004, TREE PHYSIOL, V24, P493, DOI 10.1093/treephys/24.5.493
   Bonan G., 2002, ECOLOGICAL CLIMATOLO
   Boose E., 2001, FISHER METEOROLOGICA
   Broich M, 2014, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V11, P5181, DOI 10.5194/bg-11-5181-2014
   Brunsell NA, 2008, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V112, P2977, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2008.02.002
   Campbell Gaylon S., 1998
   Cesaraccio C, 2004, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V126, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.03.002
   Choler P, 2010, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V7, P907, DOI 10.5194/bg-7-907-2010
   Chuine I, 2004, NATURE, V432, P289, DOI 10.1038/432289a
   Chuine I, 1998, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V21, P455, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00299.x
   Churkina G, 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V11, P1777, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001012.x
   Cleland EE, 2007, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V22, P357, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2007.04.003
   Cleland EE, 2006, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V103, P13740, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0600815103
   COLLATZ GJ, 1991, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V54, P107, DOI 10.1016/0168-1923(91)90002-8
   Coulter RL, 2006, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V136, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.011
   Cramer W, 2001, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V7, P357, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00383.x
   Dai YJ, 2004, J CLIMATE, V17, P2281, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<2281:ATMFCT>2.0.CO;2
   Damour G, 2010, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V33, P1419, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02181.x
   Dawson TE, 2007, TREE PHYSIOL, V27, P561, DOI 10.1093/treephys/27.4.561
   De Reaumur R., 1735, MEMORIES ACAD ROYALE, P545
   dePury DGG, 1997, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V20, P537, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1997.00094.x
   Dewar RC, 2002, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V25, P1383, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00909.x
   Ding RS, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0095584
   Dore S, 2010, ECOL APPL, V20, P663, DOI 10.1890/09-0934.1
   Dragoni D, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P886, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02281.x
   Eagleson P.S., 2002, Ecohydrology: darwinian expression of vegetation form and function, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511535680, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511535680]
   Evans SG, 2014, INT J REMOTE SENS, V35, P2996, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2014.894660
   FARQUHAR GD, 1980, PLANTA, V149, P78, DOI 10.1007/BF00386231
   FIELD C, 1983, OECOLOGIA, V56, P341, DOI 10.1007/BF00379710
   Fischer ML, 2007, EARTH INTERACT, V11
   Fisher JI, 2007, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V109, P261, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2007.01.004
   Fisher JI, 2007, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V13, P707, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01311.x
   Fitzjarrald DR, 2001, J CLIMATE, V14, P598, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<0598:CCOLPI>2.0.CO;2
   Flerchinger GN, 2009, WATER RESOUR RES, V45, DOI 10.1029/2008WR007394
   Friedl MA, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016
   Ganguly S, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P1805, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2010.04.005
   Gilmanov TG, 2005, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V14, P271, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-822x.2005.00151.x
   Givnish T.J., 1986, P 6 MAR MOORS CAB S
   Goldstein AH, 2000, ATMOS ENVIRON, V34, P4997, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00321-6
   Griffith GP, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P3058, DOI [10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02562.x, 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02453.x]
   Gu LH, 2006, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V111, DOI 10.1029/2006JD007161
   Hardiman BS, 2011, ECOLOGY, V92, P1818, DOI 10.1890/10-2192.1
   Harley PC., 2015, Modeling Crop Photosynthesis: From Biochemistry to Canopy, V19, P17, DOI [10.2135/cssaspecpub19.c2, DOI 10.2135/CSSASPECPUB19.C2]
   Hastings DA, 1998, DEV ASSESSMENT GLOBA, P4
   Heinsch F A., 2003, MOD17 User's Guide, P1
   Hollinger DY, 2010, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V16, P696, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02028.x
   Hwang T, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P2580, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12556
   Hwang T, 2011, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V26, P541, DOI 10.1007/s10980-011-9580-8
   JARVIS PG, 1986, ADV ECOL RES, V15, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60119-1
   Jeong SJ, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V117, DOI 10.1029/2011JG001868
   Jin ZN, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V119, P435, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0722-7
   Jolly WM, 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V11, P619, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00930.x
   Jönsson P, 2004, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V30, P833, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2004.05.006
   Julien Y, 2009, INT J REMOTE SENS, V30, P3495, DOI 10.1080/01431160802562255
   Kaduk JD, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V107, P277, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9951-1
   Kathilankal J., 2014, DEV SEMIPARAMETRIC P
   Katul GG, 2000, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V23, P1313, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00641.x
   Körner C, 2010, SCIENCE, V327, P1461, DOI 10.1126/science.1186473
   Kucharik CJ, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V196, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.11.031
   Law BE, 2004, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V10, P1429, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00822.x
   LEUNING R, 1995, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V18, P339, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00370.x
   Levis S, 2004, J CLIMATE, V17, P4531, DOI 10.1175/3218.1
   Lieth H. [Ed.], 1974, Ecological Stud, V8, P1
   Liu H, 2013, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V17, P805, DOI 10.5194/hess-17-805-2013
   Lotsch A, 2003, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V30, DOI 10.1029/2003GL017506
   Melaas E.K., 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL
   Melaas EK, 2013, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V171, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.11.018
   Menzel A, 2002, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V54, P379, DOI 10.1023/A:1016125215496
   Miller GR, 2007, ADV WATER RESOUR, V30, P1065, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.10.002
   Mitchell KE, 2004, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V109, DOI 10.1029/2003JD003823
   Molotch NP, 2009, ECOHYDROLOGY, V2, P129, DOI 10.1002/eco.48
   Mu QZ, 2011, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V115, P1781, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019
   Muldavin EH, 2008, OECOLOGIA, V155, P123, DOI 10.1007/s00442-007-0880-2
   Myneni RB, 2002, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V83, P214, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00074-3
   Noormets A, 2010, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V16, P272, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01928.x
   OKeefe J., 2000, Phenology of Woody Species
   Oleson KW, 2010, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V37, DOI 10.1029/2009GL042194
   Oren R, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P883, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01131.x
   Pearcy R. W., 1989, Plant physiological ecology: field methods and instrumentation., P137
   Piao SL, 2007, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V21, DOI 10.1029/2006GB002888
   Piao SL, 2011, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V151, P1599, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.06.016
   Polgar CA, 2011, NEW PHYTOL, V191, P926, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03803.x
   Richardson AD, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P1174, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01164.x
   Richardson AD, 2013, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V169, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.012
   Richardson Andrew D., 2009, P87, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-0026-5_4
   Richardson AD, 2009, TREE PHYSIOL, V29, P321, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpn040
   Rodell M, 2004, B AM METEOROL SOC, V85, P381, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-85-3-381
   Running SW, 2000, METHODS IN ECOSYSTEM SCIENCE, P44
   Ryu Y, 2011, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V25, DOI 10.1029/2011GB004053
   Scott RL, 2010, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V150, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.002
   Sellers PJ, 1996, J CLIMATE, V9, P676, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<0676:ARLSPF>2.0.CO;2
   SELLERS PJ, 1985, INT J REMOTE SENS, V6, P1335, DOI 10.1080/01431168508948283
   Shen MG, 2011, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V151, P1711, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.07.003
   Sitch S, 2003, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V9, P161, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00569.x
   Sparks TH, 2000, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V44, P82, DOI 10.1007/s004840000049
   Thornton P.E., 2012, DAYMET DAILY SURFACE, DOI DOI 10.3334/ORNLDAAC/DAYMETV2
   Traore AK, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V119, P1554, DOI 10.1002/2014JG002638
   Wang WM, 2007, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V143, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.12.003
   Wang XH, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P1240, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1014425108
   Wharton S, 2012, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V161, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.03.007
   White MA, 1997, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V11, P217, DOI 10.1029/97GB00330
   White MA, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P2335, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01910.x
   Wilson TB, 2007, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V144, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.04.001
   Wu XC, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P870, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12086
   Xia YL, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V117, DOI 10.1029/2011JD016048
   Xiao JF, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P576, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2009.10.013
   Xiao XM, 2004, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V89, P519, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.008
   Xin Q, 2015, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V12, P3447, DOI 10.5194/bg-12-3447-2015
   Xin QC, 2015, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V161, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2015.02.003
   Xin QC, 2015, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V201, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.11.004
   Yang X, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V117, DOI 10.1029/2012JG001977
   Yu HY, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P22151, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1012490107
   Zhang GL, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P4309, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1210423110
   Zhang XY, 2003, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V84, P471, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00135-9
NR 122
TC 9
Z9 10
U1 0
U2 73
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0168-1923
EI 1873-2240
J9 AGR FOREST METEOROL
JI Agric. For. Meteorol.
PD NOV 15
PY 2016
VL 228
BP 139
EP 163
DI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.06.017
PG 25
WC Agronomy; Forestry; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Forestry; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA DV9XJ
UT WOS:000383295200013
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Li, Y
   Zhang, WT
   Bai, MX
   Wu, JY
   Zhu, CMY
   Fu, YJ
AF Li, Yao
   Zhang, Wanting
   Bai, Mengxi
   Wu, Jiayu
   Zhu, Chenmengyuan
   Fu, Yujuan
TI Impact of Ridge Tillage and Mulching on Water Dynamics of Summer Maize
   Fields Under Climate Change in the Semi-Arid Region of Northwestern
   Liaoning, China
SO AGRONOMY-BASEL
LA English
DT Article
DE hydrological simulation; water use efficiency; climate adaptation
   strategies; ridge tillage effects; soil moisture dynamics; future
   emission scenarios
ID HYDRUS-2D MODEL; USE EFFICIENCY; SOIL; FURROW; IRRIGATION; SIMULATION;
   MOVEMENT; YIELD; TEMPERATURE; MOISTURE
AB The ridge-furrow plastic mulching technique has been widely applied due to its benefits of increasing temperature, conserving moisture, reducing evaporation, and boosting yields. Hydrus-2D is a computer model designed to simulate the two-dimensional movement of water in soil characterized by a low cost and high flexibility compared to field experiments. This study, based on field experiment data from Jianping County, Liaoning Province, China, during 2017-2018, developed Hydrus-2D models for two distinct field management practices: non-mulched flat cultivation (NM-FC) and mulched ridge tillage (M-RT). Furthermore, it simulated the dynamic changes in farmland water variations during the summer maize growth period (2021-2100) under climate change scenarios, specifically medium and high emission pathways (SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5), based on the FGOALS-g3 model, which exhibits the highest similarity to the climate pattern of Jianping County in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) global climate models and the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). The results showed that in the future FGOALS-g3 model, net radiation exhibited a significant upward trend under the SSP2-4.5 scenario (Z = 2.38), while the average air temperature showed a highly significant increase under both SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, with Z-values of 6.48 and 8.90, respectively. The Hydrus-2D model demonstrated high simulation accuracy in both NM-FC and M-RT treatments (R2 ranging from 0.86 to 0.96, with RMSE not exceeding 0.011), accurately simulating the dynamic changes in soil water content (SWC) under future climate change. Compared to NM-FC, M-RT reduced evaporation, increased transpiration, and effectively decreased the leakage caused by increased future precipitation, resulting in a 0.04 and 0.01 cm3/cm3 increase in surface and deep soil SWC, respectively, during the summer maize growing season, significantly improving water use efficiency. Moreover, M-RT treatment reduced the impact coefficients of climate change on various water balance parameters, stabilizing changes in these parameters and SWC under future climate conditions. This study demonstrates the significant advantages of M-RT in coping with climate change, providing key scientific evidence for future agricultural water resource management. These findings offer valuable insights for policymakers and farmers, particularly in developing adaptive land management and irrigation strategies, helping to improve water use efficiency and promote sustainable agricultural practices.
C1 [Li, Yao; Zhang, Wanting; Bai, Mengxi; Wu, Jiayu; Zhu, Chenmengyuan; Fu, Yujuan] Shenyang Agr Univ, Coll Water Conservancy, Shenyang 110866, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Yao] Northwest A&F Univ, Key Lab Agr Soil & Water Engn Arid Semiarid Areas, Minist Educ, Xianyang 712100, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Yao] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Water Resources & Architectural Engn, Xianyang 712100, Peoples R China.
RP Fu, YJ (corresponding author), Shenyang Agr Univ, Coll Water Conservancy, Shenyang 110866, Peoples R China.
EM lllyyy@nwafu.edu.cn; wanting_zhang@163.com; 15533043280@163.com;
   15382081005@163.com; syn9406@163.com; fyj0249@syau.edu.cn
FU the National Key Research and Development Program [2021YFD1500701];
   National Key Research and Development Program "Scientific and
   Technological Innovation for the Protection and Utilization of Black
   Soil" under the project "Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Wind, Water
FX We appreciate the support of the National Key Research and Development
   Program "Scientific and Technological Innovation for the Protection and
   Utilization of Black Soil" under the project "Spatiotemporal
   Differentiation of Wind, Water, and Freeze-Thaw Erosion and the
   Mechanisms of Overlapping Driving Factors" (2021YFD1500701) for this
   research.
CR Allen RG, 2006, AGR WATER MANAGE, V81, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.03.007
   Blanchy G, 2023, SOIL-GERMANY, V9, DOI 10.5194/soil-9-1-2023
   Bolte K, 2011, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V11, P209, DOI 10.1007/s11368-010-0281-8
   Cannon AJ, 2018, CLIM DYNAM, V50, P31, DOI 10.1007/s00382-017-3580-6
   Dong QG, 2018, AGR WATER MANAGE, V201, P268, DOI [10.1016/j.agwat.2017.12.011, 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.12.]
   Guo Y, 2021, FIELD CROP RES, V262, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.108028
   Hausfather Z, 2020, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V47, DOI 10.1029/2019GL085378
   He QS, 2018, AGR WATER MANAGE, V210, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.08.005
   Hu ZC, 2020, HYDROLOG SCI J, V65, P2419, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2020.1810253
   Huang YW, 2021, AGR WATER MANAGE, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106962
   Jiang SZ, 2019, AGR WATER MANAGE, V216, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.02.014
   Kader MA, 2021, WATER SUPPLY, V21, P2615, DOI 10.2166/ws.2021.095
   Kadyampakeni DM, 2018, J ENVIRON QUAL, V47, P1546, DOI 10.2134/jeq2018.02.0056
   Kandelous MM, 2010, AGR WATER MANAGE, V97, P1070, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.02.012
   Kang YH, 2014, IRRIG DRAIN, V63, P394, DOI 10.1002/ird.1799
   Kusumastuti C, 2021, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V48, DOI 10.1029/2021GL092953
   Li CJ, 2016, FIELD CROP RES, V188, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.01.013
   Li JD, 2022, ENVIRON RES COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/ac814c
   Li R, 2013, AGR WATER MANAGE, V116, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.10.001
   Li WW, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V24, P23168, DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-9955-8
   Liao Y, 2021, AGR WATER MANAGE, V253, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106936
   Liu MH, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V703, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134621
   Ma ZZ, 2021, GEODERMA, V388, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.114928
   Mak-Mensah E, 2021, PEERJ, V9, DOI 10.7717/peerj.10967
   Morianou G, 2023, WATER-SUI, V15, DOI 10.3390/w15040741
   Peng XB, 2023, J SCI FOOD AGR, V103, P1761, DOI 10.1002/jsfa.12317
   Rani A, 2024, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/rs16163108
   Richards LA, 1931, PHYSICS-J GEN APPL P, V1, P318, DOI 10.1063/1.1745010
   Rossato L, 2017, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V5, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00073
   Saha A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V739, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139863
   Shan GL, 2019, BIOSYST ENG, V179, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.12.007
   Shen QX, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11061153
   Singh Mahesh Chand, 2013, Crop Research (Hisar), V45, P45
   Sultan B., 2023, PLoS Clim, V2, DOI [10.1371/journal.pclm.0000263, DOI 10.1371/JOURNAL.PCLM.0000263]
   VANGENUCHTEN MT, 1980, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V44, P892, DOI 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
   Wang C, 2021, AGR WATER MANAGE, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106762
   Wang Hong-fei, 2014, Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao, V25, P155
   Wesseling J.G., 1985, Introduction of the Occurrence of High Groundwater Levels and Surface Water Storage in Computer Program SWATRE
   Xu XX, 2017, INT SOIL WATER CONSE, V5, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.05.010
   Zhang F, 2017, AGR SYST, V150, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.10.011
   Zhang H, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V666, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.415
   Zhang H, 2023, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/agronomy13122941
   Zhang K, 2023, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/atmos14040665
   Zhang XD, 2019, FIELD CROP RES, V233, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.01.009
NR 44
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4395
J9 AGRONOMY-BASEL
JI Agronomy-Basel
PD DEC
PY 2024
VL 14
IS 12
AR 3032
DI 10.3390/agronomy14123032
PG 32
WC Agronomy; Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Plant Sciences
GA Q4I6W
UT WOS:001384343200001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Bühler, M
   Hollenbach, P
   Koöhler, L
   Armstrong, R
AF Buehler, Michael
   Hollenbach, Pia
   Koehler, Lothar
   Armstrong, Rachel
TI Unlocking resilience and sustainability with earth-based materials: a
   principled framework for urban transformation
SO FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE regenerative design; resilient systems; bioelectricity; new materialism;
   environmental and climate adaptation; computational modelling; earth
   based materials; microbes
ID WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; BIOFILMS; ARCHITECTURE; BIORECEPTIVITY;
   BACTERIAL; CONCRETE; DESIGN; CARBON; CELLS
AB This paper introduces a transformative "living" hypothesis in architecture and engineering, proposing a paradigm shift from conventional design to regenerative, ecologically interconnected resilient systems. At the heart of our hypothesis is the integration of earth-bound materials and bioreceptive surfaces through metabolic exchanges that can be directly monitored via bioelectricity using advanced computational models and cooperative governance structures. This innovative approach that links the living world with natural materials and digital computing, aims to foster sustainable urban development that dynamically and meaningfully responds to ecological shifts, thereby enhancing social sustainability and environmental resilience. Founded on an active relationship with Earth Based Materials (EBMs) our work operationalises the foundational link between organic life and inorganic matter, e.g., minerals, to establish a dynamic relationship between building materials, and ecological systems drawing on the foundational metabolisms of microbes. To enable this ambitious synthesis, our work builds upon and diverges from traditional foundations by operationalizing actor-network theory, new materialism, and regenerative design principles through the application of bioelectrical microbes to "living" materials and digital twins. We propose a novel resilience framework that not only advocates for a symbiotic relationship between human habitats and natural ecosystems but also outlines practical pathways for the creation of adaptive, self-organizing built environments that are informed by data collection and metabolic feedback loops. These environments are fundamentally regenerative, dynamic, and environmentally responsive in ways that can be understood and engaged by human engineers and designers, transcending current sustainability and resilience targets through a methodology rooted in interdisciplinary collaboration. We address challenges such as regulatory barriers, lack of standardization, and perceptions of inferiority compared to conventional materials, proposing a new standardization framework adaptable to the unique properties of these materials. Our vision is supported by advanced predictive digital modelling techniques and sensors, including the integration of biofilms that generate action potentials, enabling the development of Digital Twins that respond to metabolic signals to enhance sustainability, biodiversity, and ultimately generate environmentally positive socio-economic outcomes. This paper reviews existing methodologies to establish an overview of state-of-the-art developments and offers a clear, actionable plan and recommendations for the realization of regenerative and resilient systems in urban development. It contributes a unique perspective on sustainable urban development, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach, which integrates the foundational metabolism of microbes, assisted by big biological data and artificial intelligences that act in concert to respect both the environment and the intricate dynamics of living systems.
C1 [Buehler, Michael; Hollenbach, Pia] Univ Appl Sci HTWG Konstanz, Fac Civil Engn, Constance, Germany.
   [Buehler, Michael; Hollenbach, Pia; Koehler, Lothar] GemeinWerk Ventures GmbH, Munich, Germany.
   [Armstrong, Rachel] KU Leuven Univ, Fac Architecture, Brussels, Belgium.
C3 HTWG Hochschule Konstanz University of Applied Sciences; KU Leuven
RP Bühler, M (corresponding author), Univ Appl Sci HTWG Konstanz, Fac Civil Engn, Constance, Germany.; Bühler, M (corresponding author), GemeinWerk Ventures GmbH, Munich, Germany.
EM mbuehler@htwg-konstanz.de
OI Armstrong, Rachel/0000-0002-3516-6815
FU German Science Foundation (DFG); Baden-Wuerttemberg Ministry of Science,
   Research and Culture (Ministerium fuer Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst
   Baden-Wurttemberg); University of Applied Sciences Konstanz (HTWG
   Hochschule Konstanz Technik, Wirtschaft und Gestaltung); EU [686585];
   University of Trento, University of the West of England, Spanish
   National Research Council; Active Living Infrastructure: Controlled
   Environment (ALICE) - EU Innovation Award [2019-2021]; EU [851246]; EIC
   Pathfinder Open award; University of Southampton (UK); Spanish National
   Research Council (Spain); University of the West of England (UK)
FX The authors declare that financial support was received for the
   research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The hypotheses
   presented in this work emerged from joint collaborative discussions
   during the proposal writing phase for an EU project. The article
   processing charges (APC) were fully funded by the German Science
   Foundation (DFG), the Baden-Wuerttemberg Ministry of Science, Research
   and Culture (Ministerium fuer Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst
   Baden-Wuerttemberg) and the University of Applied Sciences Konstanz
   (HTWG Hochschule Konstanz Technik, Wirtschaft und Gestaltung). Living
   Architecture is Funded by the EU Horizon 2020 Future Emerging
   Technologies Open programme (2016-2019) Grant Agreement 686585 a
   consortium of six collaborating institutions-Newcastle University,
   University of Trento, University of the West of England, Spanish
   National Research Council, Explora Biotech and Liquifer Systems Group.
   The Active Living Infrastructure: Controlled Environment (ALICE) project
   is funded by an EU Innovation Award for the development of a bio-digital
   "brick" prototype, a collaboration between Newcastle University,
   Translating Nature, and the University of the West of England
   (2019-2021) under EU Grant Agreement no. 851246. Microbial Hydroponics
   (Mi-Hy) is funded by an EIC Pathfinder Open award for the development of
   a next-generation hydroponics system with a prosthetic rhizome, which is
   a collaboration between KU Leuven (Belgium), the University of
   Southampton (UK), Sony Computer Science Laboratory (Paris), the Spanish
   National Research Council (Spain), Biofaction (Austria) and the
   University of the West of England (UK).
CR Adamatzky A., 2021, Adaptive fungal architectures
   Agamben G, 1998, REV OCCIDENTE, P63
   ALICE Active Living Infrastructure: controlled Environment ALICE, 2019, "living"installation that communicates with microbes in real time by monitoring their electricity production so we can "respond"to them by feeding them with our liquid waste
   Andersson E, 2019, BIOSCIENCE, V69, P566, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biz058
   [Anonymous], 2007, REASSEMBLING SOCIAL
   Armstrong Rachel, 2015, International Journal of Actor-Network Theory and Technological Innovation, V7, P18, DOI 10.4018/ijantti.2015010103
   Armstrong R., 2023, Deanthropocentrising the Microbial Commons
   Armstrong R., 2023, J. Chin. Archit. Urbanism, V0, P1882, DOI [10.36922/jcau.1882, DOI 10.36922/JCAU.1882]
   Armstrong R., 2017, Living architecture (LIAR): metabolically engineered building units
   Armstrong R, 2023, MICROB BIOTECHNOL, V16, P1112, DOI 10.1111/1751-7915.14256
   ARUP, 2022, Solar leaf, Hamburg. Worldwide first facade system to cultivate micro-algae to generate heat and biomass as renewable energy sources
   Babauta J, 2012, BIOFOULING, V28, P789, DOI 10.1080/08927014.2012.710324
   Barad K., 2007, M UNIVERSE HALFWAY Q
   Bennett J., 2010, VIBRANT MATTER POLIT
   Bennett J., 2010, New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics
   Bhina MR, 2023, J CHIN INST ENG, V46, P726, DOI 10.1080/02533839.2023.2238789
   Bing F C, 1971, J Hist Med Allied Sci, V26, P158
   Bio G., 2024, Grown bio-high quality mycelium products
   BIQ, 2011, Smart material houses
   Bloom D.E., 2004, Global demographic change: dimensions and economic significance
   Blute M., 2010, Can. J. Sociol, V34, P1161, DOI [10.29173/cjs6800, DOI 10.29173/CJS6800]
   Bond DR, 2003, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V69, P1548, DOI 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1548-1555.2003
   Braungart M, 2007, J CLEAN PROD, V15, P1337, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.003
   Bühler MM, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151310677
   Bühler MM, 2023, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/buildings13020442
   Bühler MM, 2022, EDUC SCI, V12, DOI 10.3390/educsci12110782
   Bühler MM, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13183634
   Buhler M. M., 2023, Unlocking the power of digital commons: data cooperatives as a pathway for data sovereign, innovative and equitable digital communities
   Calder B., 2022, Architecture: from prehistory to climate emergency
   Chang I, 2015, INT J POLYM SCI, V2015, DOI 10.1155/2015/326745
   Conant H., 1966, Inside the endless House, V27, P444
   D'Orazio M, 2014, BUILD ENVIRON, V77, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.018
   Dolphijn R., 2021, New materialism: interviews and cartographies
   Dulon S, 2007, J APPL ELECTROCHEM, V37, P173, DOI 10.1007/s10800-006-9250-8
   Dyllick T., 2002, Business Strategy and the Environment, V11, P130, DOI [10.1002/bse.323, DOI 10.1002/BSE.323]
   EIC, 2023, Architecture, engineering and construction digitalisation for a novel triad of design, fabrication, and materials
   Elbert W, 2012, NAT GEOSCI, V5, P459, DOI 10.1038/ngeo1486
   Fairus M.J., 2022, J SUSTAIN SCI MANAG, V17, P271, DOI [10.46754/jssm.2022.01.018, DOI 10.46754/jssm.2022.01.018]
   Feng Y, 2008, APPL MICROBIOL BIOT, V78, P873, DOI 10.1007/s00253-008-1360-2
   Freeman C, 2012, PHILOS T R SOC A, V370, P4404, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2012.0105
   Garg R, 2023, J SUSTAIN CEM-BASED, V12, P317, DOI 10.1080/21650373.2022.2054477
   Gasteiger H. A., 2010, Beginning-of-life MEA performance-efficiency loss contributions
   Gorby YA, 2006, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V103, P11358, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0604517103
   Goubran S, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V326, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116552
   Haneef M, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/srep41292
   Haraway D, 2006, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF VIRTUAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, VOL I, P117, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-3803-7_4
   Henderson L. J., 1913, Part Delivered as lectures in the lowell institute, DOI [10.5962/bhl.title.21049, DOI 10.5962/BHL.TITLE.21049]
   Hird MJ, 2009, ORIGINS OF SOCIABLE LIFE: EVOLUTION AFTER SCIENCE STUDIES, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230242210
   Human Microbiome Project Consortium, 2012, Nature, V486, P207, DOI 10.1038/nature11234
   Jacobs J., 1969, The Economy of Cities
   Jain S, 2021, BIOENGINEERED, V12, P7529, DOI 10.1080/21655979.2021.1979862
   Jones R. J., 2022, Engineered living, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-92949-77, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-92949-77]
   Jonkers HM, 2008, TAILOR MADE CONCRETE STRUCTURES: NEW SOLUTIONS FOR OUR SOCIETY, P109, DOI 10.1201/9781439828410.ch72
   Joshi S, 2017, J IND MICROBIOL BIOT, V44, P1511, DOI 10.1007/s10295-017-1978-0
   Kato S, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P10042, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1117592109
   Kembel SW, 2012, ISME J, V6, P1469, DOI 10.1038/ismej.2011.211
   King GM, 2014, J MICROBIOL, V52, P721, DOI 10.1007/s12275-014-4364-x
   Kirchherr J, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V127, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
   Koolhaas Rem., 2011, Project Japan: Metabolism Talks
   Kyaw HWY, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15030753
   Latour B., 2017, Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime
   Linnaeus Online, 2024, LINNAEUS ONLINE: the linnaean gardens of uppsala
   Logan BE, 2005, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V52, P31, DOI 10.2166/wst.2005.0495
   Logan W.B., 2007, Dirt, the ecstatic skin of the Earth
   Mahrous R, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108920
   Marsili E, 2010, ELECTROANAL, V22, P865, DOI 10.1002/elan.200800007
   Mathis BJ, 2008, APPL MICROBIOL BIOT, V78, P147, DOI 10.1007/s00253-007-1266-4
   Menges A, 2012, ARCHIT DESIGN, V82, P14, DOI 10.1002/ad.1374
   Miller AZ, 2012, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V426, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.026
   Mojzsis SJ, 1996, NATURE, V384, P55, DOI 10.1038/384055a0
   Montgomery M.R., 2013, Cities transformed: demographic change and its implications in the developing world
   Mustafa KF, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13137453
   Nevin KP, 2008, ENVIRON MICROBIOL, V10, P2505, DOI 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01675.x
   Okobaudat, 2024, Informationsportal nachhaltiges bauen-database of sustainable construction
   Petrovski AA, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13042411
   Potter MC, 1911, P R SOC LOND B-CONTA, V84, P260, DOI 10.1098/rspb.1911.0073
   Priavolou C, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11174746
   Price Cedric., 1984, Cedric Price
   Rabaey K, 2005, TRENDS BIOTECHNOL, V23, P291, DOI 10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.04.008
   Rafsanjani H. N., 2023, Energy and built environment
   Rahman A, 2022, J COMPOS SCI, V6, DOI 10.3390/jcs6080237
   Reichert S, 2015, COMPUT AIDED DESIGN, V60, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.cad.2014.02.010
   Revell Andrea., 2007, Business Strategy and the Environment, V16, P404, DOI [10.1002/bse.499, DOI 10.1002/BSE.499]
   Robertson O., 2020, Proceedings of Nord Design, P2020, DOI [10.35199/norddesign2020.18, DOI 10.35199/NORDDESIGN2020.18]
   Rosenbaum MA, 2014, APPL MICROBIOL BIOT, V98, P509, DOI 10.1007/s00253-013-5396-6
   Salifu E., 2021, Young Researchers Forum V
   Sarkar M, 2024, CHEM ENG J, V481, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2023.148148
   Schalk M, 2014, ARTS, V3, P279, DOI 10.3390/arts3020279
   Sender R, 2016, CELL, V164, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.013
   Sharma TK, 2017, J APPL MICROBIOL, V122, P1233, DOI 10.1111/jam.13421
   Shi S, 2019, CHEM ENG J, V369, P694, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.120
   Shittu E, 2021, ADV APPL ENERGY, V4, DOI 10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100036
   Soares S., 2023, Material futures: an introduction of regenerative design principles to product design students
   Song T., 2021, Self-healing materials: a review of recent developments, DOI [10.30919/esmm5f465, DOI 10.30919/ESMM5F465]
   Stohl L., 2023, Bioreceptivity of concrete: a review, V76
   Storefront, 2023, Storefront for art and architecture. (2019) subculture: microbial metrics and the multi-species city
   Sydor M, 2022, MATERIALS, V15, DOI 10.3390/ma15186283
   Tamari T, 2014, THEOR CULT SOC, V31, P201, DOI 10.1177/0263276414547777
   Timmis K, 2019, ENVIRON MICROBIOL, V21, P1513, DOI 10.1111/1462-2920.14611
   Turner C. J., 2020, Utilizing industry 4.0 on the construction site: challenges and opportunities
   Tzonis A., 2002, Le corbusier: the poetics of machine and metaphor
   van de Guchte M, 2018, MICROBIOME, V6, DOI 10.1186/s40168-018-0466-8
   Walker B., 2004, Ecology and Society, V9, P5
   Walter XA, 2018, J POWER SOURCES, V392, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.047
   Wei-Haas M., 2016, Life and rocks may have co-evolved on earth
   Whelan T., 2016, Harv. Bus. Rev
   Yang QY, 2021, DISCRETE DYN NAT SOC, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/5558497
   You JS, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14031735
   Zhu LP, 2018, ROY SOC OPEN SCI, V5, DOI 10.1098/rsos.180396
NR 109
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 6
U2 6
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2297-3362
J9 FRONT BUILT ENVIRON
JI Front. Built Environ.
PD JUL 4
PY 2024
VL 10
AR 1385116
DI 10.3389/fbuil.2024.1385116
PG 20
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
GA YT7Q4
UT WOS:001270807300001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Schubert, JE
   Mach, KJ
   Sanders, BF
AF Schubert, Jochen E.
   Mach, Katharine J.
   Sanders, Brett F.
TI National-Scale Flood Hazard Data Unfit for Urban Risk Management
SO EARTHS FUTURE
LA English
DT Article
DE flood risk; exposure; urban flooding; social inequalities; hydrodynamic
   modeling; climate adaptation
AB Extreme flooding events are becoming more frequent and costly, and impacts have been concentrated in cities where exposure and vulnerability are both heightened. To manage risks, governments, the private sector, and households now rely on flood hazard data from national-scale models that lack accuracy in urban areas due to unresolved drainage processes and infrastructure. Here we assess the uncertainties of First Street Foundation (FSF) flood hazard data, available across the U.S., using a new model (PRIMo-Drain) that resolves drainage infrastructure and fine resolution drainage dynamics. Using the case of Los Angeles, California, we find that FSF and PRIMo-Drain estimates of population and property value exposed to 1%- and 5%-annual-chance hazards diverge at finer scales of governance, for example, by 4- to 18-fold at the municipal scale. FSF and PRIMo-Drain data often predict opposite patterns of exposure inequality across social groups (e.g., Black, White, Disadvantaged). Further, at the county scale, we compute a Model Agreement Index of only 24%-a similar to 1 in 4 chance of models agreeing upon which properties are at risk. Collectively, these differences point to limited capacity of FSF data to confidently assess which municipalities, social groups, and individual properties are at risk of flooding within urban areas. These results caution that national-scale model data at present may misinform urban flood risk strategies and lead to maladaptation, underscoring the importance of refined and validated urban models.
   Flooding presents a significant risk to human activities and development, and its impacts have been rapidly increasing over recent decades. However, government flood mapping in the U.S. has not kept pace with adaptation needs, and communities have now turned to other sources of information to inform planning and design decisions. This study examines the uncertainties of flood hazard data available from the First Street Foundation across Los Angeles, California, the second largest city in the U.S. With a comparision to two different models that more fully capture processes known to affect urban flooding, we show concerning levels of uncertainty in the First Street Foundation data at scales of municipalities and properties. These results highlight the need for more robust validation of urban flood hazard models, and caution against overliance of First Street Foundation data for urban flood management.
   Flood risks are concentrated in urban areas, where national-scale hazard models are less accurate Flood exposure estimates become increasingly uncertain at finer scales and may misrepresent the social distribution of risk Refined and validated urban flood models are needed to effectively and equitably manage increasingly severe flood risks
C1 [Schubert, Jochen E.; Sanders, Brett F.] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.
   [Mach, Katharine J.] Univ Miami, Rosenstiel Sch Marine Atmospher & Earth Sci, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Miami, FL USA.
   [Mach, Katharine J.] Univ Miami, Leonard & Jayne Abess Ctr Ecosyst Sci & Policy, Coral Gables, FL USA.
   [Sanders, Brett F.] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urban Planning & Publ Policy, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.
C3 University of California System; University of California Irvine;
   University of Miami; University of Miami; University of California
   System; University of California Irvine
RP Sanders, BF (corresponding author), Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.; Sanders, BF (corresponding author), Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urban Planning & Publ Policy, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.
EM bsanders@uci.edu
RI Sanders, Brett/K-7153-2012
OI Mach, Katharine/0000-0002-5591-8148; Sanders, Brett/0000-0002-1592-5204
FU National Science Foundation [HDBE-2031535, HDBE-2034308, SCC-2305476];
   NOAA Effects of Sea Level Rise Program [NA23NOS4780283]
FX We express our thanks to the First Street Foundation for making flood
   hazard data available for this study. We also acknowledge high
   performance computing support from the NCAR-Wyoming Supercomputing
   Center provided by the National Science Foundation and the State of
   Wyoming, and supported by NCAR's Computational and Information Systems
   Laboratory. We acknowledge comments and suggestions by S.J. Davis and
   E.-M. Martin which improved the paper, as well as the comments of the
   reviewers. This work was supported by grants from the National Science
   Foundation (HDBE-2031535, HDBE-2034308 and SCC-2305476) and the NOAA
   Effects of Sea Level Rise Program (Grant NA23NOS4780283). B. Sanders and
   J. Schubert have an equity interest in Zeppelin Floods LLC. This
   relationship has been reviewed and approved by the University of
   California, Irvine in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.
CR Alipour A, 2022, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V152, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105398
   [Anonymous], 2023, EJScreen: Environmental justice screening and mapping tool
   [Anonymous], 2020, First Street Foundation Flood Model (FSF-FM) Technical Documentation, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.4740762, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.4740762]
   Bates P., 2023, Nat. Water, V1, P566, DOI [10.1038/s44221-023-00106-4, DOI 10.1038/S44221-023-00106-4]
   Bates P, 2023, NAT SUSTAIN, V6, P9, DOI 10.1038/s41893-022-01000-9
   Bates PD, 2021, WATER RESOUR RES, V57, DOI 10.1029/2020WR028673
   Bates PD, 2012, HYDROL PROCESS, V26, P2515, DOI 10.1002/hyp.9374
   Bates PD, 2010, J HYDROL, V387, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.027
   Bullard Robert D., 2012, WRONG COMPLEXION PRO
   Chakraborty J, 2019, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V109, P244, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304846
   Conkle C., 2006, Hydrology Manual
   de Moel H, 2015, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V20, P865, DOI 10.1007/s11027-015-9654-z
   Dottori F, 2013, WATER RESOUR RES, V49, P6079, DOI 10.1002/wrcr.20406
   Dottori F, 2016, ADV WATER RESOUR, V94, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.05.002
   Duncan B. I., 2023, South Carolina Office of Resilience
   Elvidge CD, 2007, SENSORS-BASEL, V7, P1962, DOI 10.3390/s7091962
   Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2022, National flood insurance program risk rating 2.0 methodology and data sources
   FEMA, 2018, Flood depth and analysis grids
   Gallegos HA, 2009, ADV WATER RESOUR, V32, P1323, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.05.008
   Gold A, 2023, WATER RESOUR RES, V59, DOI 10.1029/2022WR032392
   Harris Lee., 2023, The American Prospect
   Hino M, 2021, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V118, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2003374118
   Hornbeck R, 2014, AM ECON REV, V104, P963, DOI 10.1257/aer.104.3.963
   Huang XY, 2022, SCI ADV, V8, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abq0995
   Jones L.M., 2018, The Big Ones: How Natural Disasters Have Shaped Us (and What We Can Do about Them), VFirst
   Jonkman SN, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P1004
   Kahl DT, 2022, ADV WATER RESOUR, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2022.104287
   Kelly J. V., 2017, Fema needs to improve management of its flood mapping programs
   Kim J, 2023, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101480
   Leandro J, 2009, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V135, P495, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000037
   Lindersson S, 2021, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V21, P2921, DOI 10.5194/nhess-21-2921-2021
   Los Angeles County, Data Portal for Los Angeles County Data
   Mach K.J., 2022, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science., DOI [10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.819, DOI 10.1093/ACREFORE/9780199389414.013.819]
   Magnan AK, 2023, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V13, P1213, DOI 10.1038/s41558-023-01834-x
   Mandli KT, 2014, OCEAN MODEL, V75, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.ocemod.2014.01.002
   Molinari D, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V33, P441, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.10.022
   National Research Council, 2009, MAPP ZON IMPR FLOOD
   Neal J, 2012, WATER RESOUR RES, V48, DOI 10.1029/2012WR012514
   Nguyen AM, 2023, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V20, DOI 10.3390/ijerph20020925
   O'Donnell EC, 2020, PHILOS T R SOC A, V378, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2019.0216
   OCM Partners, 2022, 20152016 LARIAC Lidar: Los Angeles Region, CA
   Orsi J, 2004, HAZARDOUS METROPOLIS: FLOODING AND URBAN ECOLOGY IN LOS ANGELES, P1
   Perica S., 2014, NOAA Atlas 14 volume 6 version 2.3, precipitationfrequency Atlas of the United States
   Realtors Property Resource, What is Risk Factor?
   Redfin, Flood Risk Information
   Rudari R., 2015, Improvement of the global food model for the GAR 2015 (UNISDR), P69
   Sampson CC, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P7358, DOI 10.1002/2015WR016954
   Sampson CC, 2013, HYDROL PROCESS, V27, P467, DOI 10.1002/hyp.9515
   Sanders B. F., 2024, ASCE OPEN: Multidisciplinary Journal of Civil Engineering, V2, DOI [10.1061/AOMJAH/AOENG-0017, DOI 10.1061/AOMJAH/AOENG-0017]
   Sanders BF, 2023, NAT SUSTAIN, V6, P47, DOI 10.1038/s41893-022-00977-7
   Sanders BF, 2020, WIRES WATER, V7, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1414
   Sanders BF, 2019, ADV WATER RESOUR, V126, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.02.007
   Savage JTS, 2016, HYDROL PROCESS, V30, P2014, DOI 10.1002/hyp.10749
   Schubert J., 2024, DRYAD, DOI [10.5061/dryad.kd51c5bcz, DOI 10.5061/DRYAD.KD51C5BCZ]
   Serra-Llobet A, 2022, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V15, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12785
   Shu EG, 2023, NAT COMMUN, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-43493-8
   Smiley KT, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aba0fe
   Smith A, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P539, DOI 10.1002/2014WR015814
   Son Y, 2023, COAST ENG, V186, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2023.104398
   Tate E, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V106, P435, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04470-2
   Trigg MA, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/094014
   U. S. Census Bureau, 2022, Glossary
   Ulibarri N, 2023, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V15, P45, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-22-0013.1
   Vahedifard F, 2023, EARTHS FUTURE, V11, DOI 10.1029/2023EF003619
   Ward PJ, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P712, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2742
   Wing OEJ, 2022, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V12, P156, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-01265-6
   Wing OEJ, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P7968, DOI 10.1002/2017WR020917
   Wobus C, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac1bd7
NR 68
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 10
U2 10
PU AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
PI WASHINGTON
PA 2000 FLORIDA AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20009 USA
EI 2328-4277
J9 EARTHS FUTURE
JI Earth Future
PD JUL
PY 2024
VL 12
IS 7
AR e2024EF004549
DI 10.1029/2024EF004549
PG 16
WC Environmental Sciences; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology &
   Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences
GA YY9K4
UT WOS:001272163500001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Reed, KFM
   Culvenor, R
   Jahufer, Z
   Nichols, P
   Smith, K
   Williams, R
AF Reed, KFM
   Culvenor, R
   Jahufer, Z
   Nichols, P
   Smith, K
   Williams, R
BE Spangenberg, GC
TI Progress and challenges:: <i>Forage breeding in temperate Australia</i>
SO MOLECULAR BREEDING OF FORAGE CROPS
SE DEVELOPMENTS IN PLANT BREEDING
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT 2nd International Symposium on Molecular Breeding of Forage Crops
CY NOV 19-24, 2000
CL LORNE, AUSTRALIA
SP Nat Resources & Environm, Australian Cooperat Res Ctr Molec Plant Breeding, Dairy Res & Dev Corp, Heritage Seeds Pty Ltd, Appl Biosyst, AgResearch Ltd, Qiagen, Qiagen Genomics, Genset Pacific, Adv Labs, Seedco
DE Phalaris aquatica; Lolium perenne; Trifolium repens; Trifolium
   subterraneum; Medicago sativa; plant toxins; pests; diseases; edaphic
   limitations; climatic adaptation
ID PERENNIAL RYEGRASS; PHALARIS; PERSISTENCE; POPULATIONS; IMPROVEMENT;
   ADAPTATION; PASTURE; PLANTS; L.
AB Australia has approximately 2.5 M ha of high quality perennial pasture. Agriculture has however, also developed in many relatively dry regions characterised by a short growing season, and infertile, acid soil. Australia's improved pasture includes introduced species not previously cultivated elsewhere (e.g. phalaris (Phalaris aquatica), tall wheatgrass (Thinopyron ponticum), barrelmedic (Medicago truncatula), strand medic(M. littoralis), subterranean/sub clover (Trifolium subterraneum), michel's/balansa clover (T. michelianum) and yellow serradella (Ornithopus compressus). Common varieties selected from naturalised species, or developed from accessions collected from the Mediterranean basin, have gradually been replaced by cultivars representing a range of maturity times, bred in the target environment using phenotypic selection and multi-site progeny testing. Over the last forty years the zone of adaptation of pasture species has greatly expanded.
   Achievements include expanding the zone of adaptation by providing a range of maturity - e.g. some subterranean clover cultivars flower up to two months later than the earliest cultivar; barrel medic cultivars vary by 3 weeks. Further achievements include seedling vigour, cool season vigour, drought tolerance and yield. In addition, the domestication of annual legumes has involved selection for hard seededness for regions with short growing seasons where cropping phases rotate with pasture. The successful domestication of phalaris involved a mutation for complete seed retention and reduction of alkaloid concentrations. Selection for low oestrogenicity has been important in sub and red clover (Trifolium pratense). Disease screening has made legumes resistant to root pathogens and foliar diseases including viruses. Modem lucerne and medic cultivars are resistant to several aphid species; some resist stem nematode. Edaphic limitations have been overcome by selecting for waterlogging resistance and tolerance to high levels of exchangeable aluminium in acid soils.
   Challenges yet to be overcome include resistance to many grassland pests including molluscs, mites, Collembola and other insects including Coleoptera, Orthoptera and Lepidoptera. Root rot and virus diseases remain serious problems with legumes. With several important forage species, elimination of toxins, persistence on acid and infertile soils - e.g. low Mo/high Mn; ability to absorb Zn at high pH - are required. We need to slow the rate of breakdown of hardseededness in some annual legumes. Susceptibility to herbicide residues and leaching of nutrients from mature herbage represent serious economic losses. Molecular markers are needed for seed retention, root architecture and Al tolerance. Possibilities for molecular breeding include the introduction of genes for drought tolerance, disease resistance, Al tolerance, increased acquisition of P from less soluble sources, increased soluble carbohydrate content and bloat-safe legumes.
C1 Agr Victoria, Pastoral & Vet Inst, Cooperat Res Ctr Mol Plant Breeding, Hamilton, Vic, Australia.
C3 Agriculture Victoria
RP Agr Victoria, Pastoral & Vet Inst, Cooperat Res Ctr Mol Plant Breeding, PB 105, Hamilton, Vic, Australia.
RI Reed, Kevin/J-5524-2019; Culvenor, Richard/B-5732-2011
OI Reed, Kevin F M/0000-0001-5600-2839
CR ALDAO G, 2000, 2 INT S MOL BREED FO, P110
   Anderson MW, 1999, AUST J EXP AGR, V39, P275, DOI 10.1071/EA98103
   ARCHER KA, 1989, AUST J AGR RES, V40, P605, DOI 10.1071/AR9890605
   AURICHT GC, 1999, P 11 AUST PLANT BREE, V1, P71
   BERG G, 1996, INVESTIGATING IMPACT
   CARLSON IT, 1996, COOL SEASON FORAGE G, P569
   CHATEL DL, 1974, J AUST I AGR SCI, V40, P80
   CLARK SG, 1987, AUST J EXP AGR, V27, P551, DOI 10.1071/EA9870551
   CLEMENTS RJ, 1984, AUST J EXP AGR, V24, P178, DOI 10.1071/EA9840178
   CROFT VM, 2000, IN PRESS AUSTR J EXP
   CULVENOR RA, 1999, P 11 AUSTR PLANT BRE, V2, P252
   De la Fuente-Martínez JM, 1999, ADV AGRON, V66, P103, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60426-5
   Donald C., 1970, Australian grasslands', P303
   DONATO R, 2000, 2 INT S MOL BREED FO, P15
   FORSTER JW, 2000, MOL BREEDING FORAGE
   FRANCIS CM, 1965, AUST J AGR RES, V16, P557, DOI 10.1071/AR9650557
   GARRETT R, 1998, WHITE CLOVER VIRUS R
   GELLERT VM, 1999, P 11 AUSTR PLANT BRE, V2, P255
   HUMPHREYS MO, 1989, GRASS FORAGE SCI, V44, P231, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1989.tb01931.x
   Jahufer MZZ, 1999, AUST J AGR RES, V50, P561, DOI 10.1071/A98141
   KALLA R, 2000, MOL BREEDING FORAGE, pCH13
   Kimbeng CA, 1999, AUST J EXP AGR, V39, P361, DOI 10.1071/EA98111
   KOLLIKER R, 2000, PLANT ANIMAL GENOME, pR8
   LEE KC, 1993, AUST J EXP AGR ANIM, V33, P33
   LIDGETT A, 2000, 2 INT S MOL BREED FO, P31
   NAIR RM, 1999, P 11 AUSTR PLANT BRE, V1, P121
   Nichols P., 1994, Journal of Agriculture, Western Australia, V35, P60
   Nichols P. G. H., 1996, AGR W AUSTR V, V4327, P61
   Nichols P.G.H., 1993, P 17 INT GRASSLAND C, VVolume 1, P453
   Oram R N., 1990, Register of Australian herbage plant cultivars
   ORAM RN, 1994, NEW ZEAL J AGR RES, V37, P329, DOI 10.1080/00288233.1994.9513071
   ORAM RN, 1990, AUST J AGR RES, V41, P657, DOI 10.1071/AR9900657
   ORAM RN, 1985, P 15 INT GRASSL C KY, P220
   Reed KFM, 1996, NEW ZEAL J AGR RES, V39, P457, DOI 10.1080/00288233.1996.9513207
   REED KFM, 2000, IN PRESS AUSTR J AGR, V50
   REED KFM, 1982, P 2 AUSTR AGR C WAGG, P142
   RICHARDSON AE, 1998, P 13 ANN C GRASSL SO, P37
   Ridsdill-Smith TJ, 1998, PEST MANAGEMENT - FUTURE CHALLENGES, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, P382
   Smith K. F., 1998, Breeding for a multifunctional agriculture. Proceedings of the 21st Meeting of the Fodder Crops and Amenity Grasses Section of EUCARPIA, Kartause Ittingen, Switzerland, 9-12 September 1997., P16
   Smith KF, 1997, GRASS FORAGE SCI, V52, P167, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2494.1997.00067.x
   Smith KF, 1999, AUST J AGR RES, V50, P79, DOI 10.1071/A98070
   SPANGENBERG G, 1998, MONOGRAPHS THEORETIC, V23
   SPANGENBERG G, 2000, 2 INT S MOL BREDD FO
   SPANGENBERG G, 2000, 2 INT S MOL BREED FO
   SPANGENBERG G, 2000, MOL BREDDING FORAGE
   WILLIAMS RW, 1999, P 11 AUSTR PLANT BRE, V1, P71
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
NR 51
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 2
U2 18
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA PO BOX 17, 3300 AA DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 1381-673X
BN 0-7923-6881-9
J9 DEV PLANT BREED
JI Dev. Plant Breed.
PY 2001
VL 10
BP 303
EP 316
PG 14
WC Agronomy; Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Plant Sciences
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Agriculture; Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Plant Sciences
GA BS43U
UT WOS:000169858400020
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Yang, WF
   Liu, JB
   Yang, JF
   Xing, SL
   Yue, ZL
   Liu, KT
   Huang, SH
   Yang, YM
   Jia, LL
AF Yang, Wenfang
   Liu, Jingbao
   Yang, Junfang
   Xing, Suli
   Yue, Zengliang
   Liu, Ketong
   Huang, Shaohui
   Yang, Yunma
   Jia, Liangliang
TI Improving Yield and Water Productivity of Rainfed Summer Maize in
   Smallholder Farming: A Case Study in Hebei Province, China
SO AGRONOMY-BASEL
LA English
DT Article
DE yield potential; water productivity; smallholder farming; rainfed summer
   maize
ID USE EFFICIENCY; HYBRID-MAIZE; CROP YIELD; NITROGEN; SYSTEM; WHEAT; GAPS;
   MANAGEMENT; PLAIN; GRAIN
AB Because of the strong competition for a limited resource of water and demand for food production, understanding yield and water productivity (WP) potentials and exploitable gaps in the current production of intensively rainfed maize (Zea mays L.) is essential on the regional scale in China. In this study, we conducted 411 site-year on-farm trials to assess the actual yield and WP of rainfed summer maize and its yield and WP potentials in Hebei Province, China. Each on-farm trial contained detailed information of three different treatments: no fertilizer application (CK), current farmers' practices (FP, depending on local farmer field fertilization management), and optimum fertilizer application (OPT, depending on soil testing and balanced fertilization). Results revealed that the yield and WP of rainfed summer maize in Hebei Province were 7635 kg ha(-1) and 20.7 kg ha(-1) mm(-1), respectively, and the yield and WP potentials were 12,148 kg ha(-1) and 32.0 kg ha(-1) mm(-1), respectively. Thus, the farmers attained 62.8% of the yield potential and 64.7% of the WP potential. A wide variation was observed in terms of the yield and WP across various types of farming. Compared with high-yield and high-WP (HYHW) farming, in low-yield and low-WP (LYLW) farming, the yield decreased by 24.9% and WP decreased by 44.4%. Nitrogen fertilizer application rate and rain were the most significant factors for yield and WP gaps among farmers, respectively. Other factors, such as solar radiation (tSola), soil available phosphorus content (AP), potassium fertilizer application rate, and grass-referenced evapotranspiration from planting to maturity (ET0), contributed the most to the variations in the yield and WP. Scenario analysis indicated that the optimization of fertilization levels from current to optimal for each farming could increase the yield and WP by 9.7% and 14.8%, respectively; closing gaps between the farming groups and achievement of the standard of HYHW farming by all farmers could increase the yield and WP by 14.8% and 35.5%, respectively; and achieving the yield and WP potentials could increase the yield and WP by 59.1% and 54.8%, respectively. These findings provided farming-based evidence that optimal nutrient management, advanced and climate-adapted agronomy practices, and higher soil fertility are essential for future maize production.
C1 [Yang, Wenfang; Yang, Junfang; Xing, Suli; Yue, Zengliang; Huang, Shaohui; Yang, Yunma; Jia, Liangliang] Hebei Acad Agr & Forestry Sci, Hebei Fertilizer Technol Innovat Ctr, Inst Agr Resources & Environm, Shijiazhuang 050051, Hebei, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Jingbao] Henan Acad Agr, Cereal Crops Inst, Zhengzhou 450002, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Ketong] Agr & Rural Affairs Dept Hebei Prov, Shijiazhuang 050021, Hebei, Peoples R China.
C3 Hebei Academy of Agricultural & Forestry Sciences; Henan Academy of
   Agricultural Sciences
RP Huang, SH; Yang, YM (corresponding author), Hebei Acad Agr & Forestry Sci, Hebei Fertilizer Technol Innovat Ctr, Inst Agr Resources & Environm, Shijiazhuang 050051, Hebei, Peoples R China.
EM shaohui1988@sina.com; yangyunma@163.com
RI Li, Xiaofeng/B-6524-2008; 黎, 伟/GXM-4040-2022
OI Jia, Liangliang/0000-0002-5293-8610
FU National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFD1901001];
   HAAFS Science and Technology Innovation Special Project
   [2022KJCXZX-ZHS4, 2022KJCXZX-ZHS-6]; HAAFS Scientific and Technological
   Innovation Personnel Project [C22R1102]; Project of the Institute of
   Agricultural Resources and Environment [ZHS-ZLXM2022-05]
FX This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development
   Program of China (2021YFD1901001), the HAAFS Science and Technology
   Innovation Special Project (2022KJCXZX-ZHS4, 2022KJCXZX-ZHS-6), the
   HAAFS Scientific and Technological Innovation Personnel Project
   (C22R1102), and the Project of the Institute of Agricultural Resources
   and Environment (ZHS-ZLXM2022-05).
CR AbdAllah AM, 2021, AGR WATER MANAGE, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106946
   BENNIE ATP, 1986, SOIL TILL RES, V7, P85, DOI 10.1016/0167-1987(86)90010-3
   Cao Y.Q., 2020, J N CHINA U WATER RE, DOI [10.19760/j.ncwu.zk.2020042, DOI 10.19760/J.NCWU.ZK.2020042]
   Chen XP, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P6399, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1101419108
   Chen XP, 2014, NATURE, V514, P486, DOI 10.1038/nature13609
   Dong QG, 2018, AGR WATER MANAGE, V201, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.01.021
   Duan JK, 2021, NAT FOOD, V2, P1014, DOI 10.1038/s43016-021-00415-5
   Fallahi H. R., 2015, Notulae Scientia Biologicae, V7, P338
   Fang Q, 2010, AGR WATER MANAGE, V97, P1165, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.02.012
   Fischer RA, 2018, FIELD CROP RES, V222, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.03.008
   Gao B, 2015, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V203, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.020
   Grassini P, 2009, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V149, P1254, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.02.012
   Hatfield JL, 2001, AGRON J, V93, P271, DOI 10.2134/agronj2001.932271x
   He G, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V245, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118928
   He P, 2022, EUR J AGRON, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2021.126409
   Hou P, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V160, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104913
   Huang SH, 2021, SOIL TILL RES, V213, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2021.105117
   Huang SH, 2021, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/agronomy11071358
   Huang SH, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V282, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111956
   Jia SL, 2011, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V90, P331, DOI 10.1007/s10705-011-9433-5
   Jiang W, 2021, FOOD ENERGY SECUR, V10, DOI 10.1002/fes3.255
   Jiao FL, 2022, AGR WATER MANAGE, V269, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107685
   Jin XP, 2020, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V54, P11894, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.0c00781
   Ju XT, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P3041, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0813417106
   [雷鸣 Lei Ming], 2018, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V73, P535
   Linquist B, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P194, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02502.x
   Luo N, 2020, CROP SCI, V60, P1580, DOI 10.1002/csc2.20000
   Meng QF, 2018, ADV AGRON, V148, P85, DOI 10.1016/bs.agron.2017.11.004
   Meng QF, 2013, FIELD CROP RES, V143, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.023
   National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, 2021, China Health Statistics Yearbook 2021
   Prasad AM, 2006, ECOSYSTEMS, V9, P181, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0054-1
   Qiao L, 2021, FIELD CROP RES, V273, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108304
   Rizzo G, 2022, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V119, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2113629119
   Shi YF, 2013, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V95, P203, DOI 10.1007/s10705-013-9558-9
   Siebert S, 2010, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V14, P1863, DOI 10.5194/hess-14-1863-2010
   van Wart J, 2013, FIELD CROP RES, V143, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.018
   Wang W, 2022, AGR WATER MANAGE, V269, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107690
   Wang WS, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V768, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.144978
   Wardak DLR, 2022, GEODERMA, V422, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115927
   Xiao GM, 2019, AGR WATER MANAGE, V212, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.011
   Xie KL, 2020, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/agronomy10030419
   Xu XP, 2016, FIELD CROP RES, V194, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.05.005
   Xu XP, 2013, FIELD CROP RES, V150, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.06.006
   Xu Z, 2020, FIELD CROP RES, V246, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107661
   Yang HS, 2006, AGRON J, V98, P737, DOI 10.2134/agronj2005.0162
   Yang HS, 2004, FIELD CROP RES, V87, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2003.10.003
   Yang YM, 2011, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V90, P379, DOI 10.1007/s10705-011-9439-z
   Ying H, 2020, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V54, P9939, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.9b05642
   Ying H, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P4273, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14798
   Ying H, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V162, P1308, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.196
   Yu CQ, 2011, NATURE, V470, P307, DOI 10.1038/470307a
   Zhang WF, 2016, NATURE, V537, P671, DOI 10.1038/nature19368
   Zhang WS, 2022, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V184, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106411
   Zhang XY, 2011, AGR WATER MANAGE, V98, P1097, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.02.003
   Zheng HF, 2020, AGR WATER MANAGE, V234, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106119
NR 55
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 5
U2 23
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4395
J9 AGRONOMY-BASEL
JI Agronomy-Basel
PD SEP
PY 2022
VL 12
IS 9
AR 1983
DI 10.3390/agronomy12091983
PG 11
WC Agronomy; Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Plant Sciences
GA 4S4LX
UT WOS:000857415400001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Nwokolo, SC
   Amadi, SO
   Obiwulu, AU
   Ogbulezie, JC
   Eyibio, EE
AF Nwokolo, Samuel Chukwujindu
   Amadi, Solomom Okechukwu
   Obiwulu, Anthony Umunnakwe
   Ogbulezie, Julie C.
   Eyibio, Effiong Ekpenyong
TI Prediction of global solar radiation potential for sustainable and
   cleaner energy generation using improved Angstrom-Prescott and Gumbel
   probabilistic models
SO CLEANER ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Location-based model; Generalized model; Angstrom-Prescott models;
   Gumbel probabilistic model; Gumbel probabilistic coefficients;
   Angstrom-Prescott coefficients
ID SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; EMPIRICAL-MODELS; CLEARNESS INDEX; DIFFUSE;
   TEMPERATURE; EQUATION
AB Predicting and improving global solar radiation models is important in Nigeria because, most government meteorological stations are unable to continuously set-up or measure this radiometric parameter in most metropolitan cities and remote villages where there is a severe need for electricity. This is because most locations are not connected to the national grid due to high cost implications. Global solar radiation (H) prediction has a great deal of benefits in adapting and implementing clean and sustainable energy infrastructure, and much more in detecting and adapting climate mitigation measures in locations affected by climate change externalities. The new Gumbel (GP) probabilistic model applied in this paper is renowned for its high prediction power and low input requirements on the coefficients of the Angstrom-Prescott (AP) model used by researchers to predict global solar radiation since 1940. This study's foremost intention was to investigate ways of generating sustainable and cleaner energy by using coefficients of the AP model in order to accelerate the greener economy in Nigeria. As such, the accuracy and suitability of 36 existing and developed empirical AP models, as well as 11 fitted GP models, were evaluated to estimate H in different climatic regions of Nigeria. The results revealed that AP models fitted with generalized datasets outperformed the 10 location-based models considered in this work and the 7 models selected from literature, however, the GP model outperformed all empirically fitted models. The model established by GP (M13) was used to optimize AP models with poor performance and those selected from literature. This study suggests that it is more realistic to apply the generalized and GP model to predict global solar radiation and generate AP estimation coefficients across Nigeria than using empirical modeling and AP estimation coefficient. This is illustrated by the high prediction accuracy, little or no instrumentation network, and the computational effort for a GP model over an instrumentation network required to generate sunshine hour datasets required to implement AP model predictions. The proposed GP model is sufficient as a valid predictive model that will promote a holistic understanding of the available solar resources in Nigeria and disseminate the application of solar photovoltaic technologies within the country.
C1 [Nwokolo, Samuel Chukwujindu; Ogbulezie, Julie C.] Univ Calabar, Fac Phys Sci, Dept Phys, Calabar, Nigeria.
   [Amadi, Solomom Okechukwu] Fed Univ Ndufu Alike Ikwo, Dept Phys Geol Geophys, Achoro Ndiagu, Nigeria.
   [Obiwulu, Anthony Umunnakwe] Univ Lagos, Dept Phys, Fac Sci, Lagos, Nigeria.
   [Eyibio, Effiong Ekpenyong] Univ Uyo, Dept Phys, Fac Sci, Uyo, Nigeria.
C3 University of Calabar; University of Lagos; University of Uyo
RP Nwokolo, SC (corresponding author), Univ Calabar, Fac Phys Sci, Dept Phys, Calabar, Nigeria.
EM nwokolosc@unical.edu.ng; solomonokeamadi@gmail.com;
   obiwulutony@yahoo.co.uk; jcogbulezie@unical.edu.ng; effiong25@gmail.com
RI Nwokolo, Samuel/HDN-1371-2022
OI NWOKOLO, SAMUEL/0000-0001-6889-9022; Obiwulu,
   Anthony/0000-0003-2147-8524
CR Adaramola MS, 2012, RENEW ENERG, V47, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2012.04.005
   Ajayi OO, 2014, SUSTAIN ENERGY TECHN, V5, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.seta.2013.11.001
   Al-Mostafa ZA, 2014, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V84, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.04.021
   Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
   Almorox J, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V154, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.023
   Angstrom A., 1924, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V50, P121, DOI DOI 10.1002/QJ.49705021008
   Anis MS, 2019, SUSTAIN ENERGY TECHN, V31, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.seta.2018.12.009
   Behar O, 2021, CLEAN ENG TECHNOL, V4, DOI 10.1016/j.clet.2021.100259
   Besharat F, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V21, P798, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.043
   Bodle R., 2016, WORKSH COP21 WHAT DO
   Bounoua Z, 2021, SUSTAIN MATER TECHNO, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00261
   Burke EJ, 2010, J HYDROL, V388, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.04.035
   Chukwujindu NS, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V78, P955, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.101
   Dallas JA, 2021, ACTA ASTRONAUT, V186, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.05.021
   Demircan C, 2020, SUSTAIN ENERGY TECHN, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.seta.2019.100574
   El Genidy M, 2019, COMMUN STAT-THEOR M, V48, P5427, DOI 10.1080/03610926.2018.1517890
   FAGBENLE RL, 1992, INT J ENERG RES, V16, P583, DOI 10.1002/er.4440160703
   Fan JL, 2019, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V100, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.018
   Fan JL, 2018, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V164, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.087
   Fan JL, 2018, ENERGY, V144, P903, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.091
   Feng Y, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109393
   Govindasamy TR, 2021, CLEAN ENG TECHNOL, V2, DOI 10.1016/j.clet.2021.100042
   GUMBEL EJ, 1954, J AM STAT ASSOC, V49, P267, DOI 10.2307/2280935
   Gumbel EJ, 1941, ANN MATH STAT, V12, P163, DOI 10.1214/aoms/1177731747
   Gumbel Emil Julius, 1954, Statistical theory of extreme values and some practical applications: a series of lectures
   HAY JE, 1979, SOL ENERGY, V23, P301, DOI 10.1016/0038-092X(79)90123-3
   Husain S, 2021, CLEAN ENG TECHNOL, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.clet.2021.100262
   IQBAL M, 1980, SOL ENERGY, V24, P491, DOI 10.1016/0038-092X(80)90317-5
   Khorasanizadeh H, 2016, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V41, P21888, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.198
   Kimball H. H., 1919, Mon. Weather Rev, V47, P769, DOI [DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1919)47<769:VITTAL>2.0.CO;2, 10.1175/1520-0493(1919)47andlt;769:vittalandgt;2.0.co;2, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1919)47ANDLT;769:VITTALANDGT;2.0.CO;2]
   Lashari AA, 2021, CLEAN ENG TECHNOL, V2, DOI 10.1016/j.clet.2021.100064
   Liobikiene G, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V309, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127233
   Liu YF, 2017, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V154, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.10.043
   Maduekwe AAL, 1997, SOL ENERGY, V61, P241, DOI 10.1016/S0038-092X(97)00020-0
   Maka A.O.M., 2021, CLEAN ENG TECHNOL, DOI [10.1016/j.clet.2021.100267, DOI 10.1016/J.CLET.2021.100267]
   Makade RG, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V293, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126208
   Marques EP, 2016, RENEW ENERG, V91, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.040
   Naserpour S, 2020, SUSTAIN ENERGY TECHN, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.seta.2020.100855
   NIMET, 2020, US
   Nwokolo S., 2017, Int. J. Phys. Res., V5, P60, DOI [10.14419/ijpr.v5i2.8160, DOI 10.14419/IJPR.V5I2.8160]
   Nwokolo S.C., 2018, Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, V7, P367, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.BJBAS.2017.05.001
   Ogolo E. O., 2014, Indian Journal of Radio & Space Physics, V43, P213
   Ohunakin OS, 2013, FRONT ENERGY, V7, P214, DOI 10.1007/s11708-013-0241-2
   Olarewaju RO, 2021, CLEAN ENG TECHNOL, V4, DOI 10.1016/j.clet.2021.100149
   Olatomiwa L, 2015, SOL ENERGY, V115, P632, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2015.03.015
   Ozoegwu CG, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V216, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.096
   Page JK, 1961, P UN C NEW SOURC EN
   Paulescu M, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V62, P495, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.012
   Prescott J.A., 1940, T FROYAL SOC, V64, P114, DOI DOI 10.1155/2013/168048
   RIETVELD MR, 1978, AGR METEOROL, V19, P243, DOI 10.1016/0002-1571(78)90014-6
   Ryan A., 2013, GUMBEL MAX TRICK DIS
   Shamshirband S, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V52, P1031, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.173
   Sun HW, 2016, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V119, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.051
   Tabelin CB, 2021, MINER ENG, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106743
   Udo SO, 2000, SOL ENERGY, V69, P45, DOI 10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00008-6
   Watari T, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V312, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127698
   WMO, 2018, GUID MET INSTR METH
   Yakoubi H, 2021, OPTIK, V242, DOI 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167145
NR 58
TC 16
Z9 16
U1 0
U2 2
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2666-7908
J9 CLEAN ENG TECHNOL
JI Cleaner Eng. Technol.
PD FEB
PY 2022
VL 6
AR 100416
DI 10.1016/j.clet.2022.100416
EA JAN 2022
PG 17
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA F2UF7
UT WOS:000980943000060
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, YQ
   Shindell, DT
AF Zhang, Yuqiang
   Shindell, Drew T.
TI Costs from labor losses due to extreme heat in the USA attributable to
   climate change
SO CLIMATIC CHANGE
LA English
DT Article
DE Extreme heat; Labor; Market cost; RCPs
ID BIAS CORRECTION; MODEL; FORMULATION; IMPACTS; HEALTH; CMIP5
AB Extreme heat is already occurring more frequently and with greater intensity, with this trend predicted to continue. Exposure to extreme heat causes labor supply declines, but studies to quantify the economic effects from future climate changes are limited. In this study, we adopt two different exposure-response functions relating extreme heat to the loss of labor working minutes or labor productivity. We estimate that temperature differences between 2006 and 2016 relative to 1980-1990 led to labor losses of similar to$1.7 billion annually in the USA. Under the high emissions RCP8.5 scenario, approximately 1-1.8 billion workforce hours will be lost annually in the 2050s, and 1.5-4.4 billion hours will be lost by the 2100s, depending on the exposure-response function used. The lost hours lead to an estimated $51-119 billion in losses by the 2100s, without considering future climate adaptation, demographic, employment, wage structure, or economic changes. Whereas 2006-2016 losses correspond to 0.07% of the 2016 GDP, the 2100s losses rise roughly fourfold to 0.3%, which are mainly caused by the increases of extreme heat conditions with population growth a secondary factor. With the climate change mitigation strategies of the RCP4.5 scenario, 600-2600 million hours of lost labor per year could be avoided in the 2100s, saving $20-78 billion depending on the chosen exposure-response function. We also evaluated the effect of decarbonizing the energy sector in a manner consistent with the 1.5 degrees C target of the Paris Agreement, finding that these lead to similar to 77 million avoided lost work hours worth similar to$2.5 billion annually by the 2050s with global collaboration but insignificant impacts with US action alone. Though uncertainties and limitations exist in the study, we find that extreme heat will cause large economic losses to US businesses, especially in southern states (from California to Florida), though widespread climate change mitigation has the potential to substantially reduce these losses. We find that uncertainties among the exposure-response functions used to derive the economic effects of extreme heat on labor are much larger than those from the climate models. Previous studies using only one exposure-response function may exhibit substantial biases and likely underestimate uncertainties associated with the effect of climate changes on labor.
C1 [Zhang, Yuqiang; Shindell, Drew T.] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, 9 Circuit Dr, Durham, NC 27708 USA.
   [Shindell, Drew T.] Tel Aviv Univ, Porter Sch Environm & Earth Sci, Tel Aviv, Israel.
C3 Duke University; Tel Aviv University
RP Zhang, YQ (corresponding author), Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, 9 Circuit Dr, Durham, NC 27708 USA.
EM Yuqiang.Zhang@duke.edu
RI Zhang, Yuqiang/C-5027-2015; Shindell, Drew/D-4636-2012
OI Zhang, Yuqiang/0000-0002-9161-7086; Shindell, Drew/0000-0003-1552-4715
FU National Science Foundation
FX Funding from the National Science Foundation's EaSM3 program is
   gratefully acknowledged.
CR [Anonymous], EN TECHN PERSP 2012
   Bentsen M, 2013, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V6, P687, DOI 10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013
   Burnett R, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P9592, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1803222115
   Chavaillaz Y, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-50047-w
   Conforti P, 2011, EXP M FEED WORLD 205
   Deser C, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P775, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1562
   Dunne JP, 2013, J CLIMATE, V26, P2247, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00150.1
   Dunne JP, 2012, J CLIMATE, V25, P6646, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00560.1
   Frieler K, 2017, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V10, P4321, DOI 10.5194/gmd-10-4321-2017
   Giani P, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab7f0f
   Haines A, 2019, NEW ENGL J MED, V380, P263, DOI 10.1056/NEJMra1807873
   Hempel S, 2013, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V4, P219, DOI 10.5194/esd-4-219-2013
   Hsiang S, 2017, SCIENCE, V356, P1362, DOI 10.1126/science.aal4369
   IPCC, 2018, MITIGATION PATHWAYS
   Iversen T, 2013, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V6, P389, DOI 10.5194/gmd-6-389-2013
   Jin XM, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab2dcb
   Jones CD, 2011, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V4, P543, DOI 10.5194/gmd-4-543-2011
   Kelley M, 2020, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V12, DOI 10.1029/2019MS002025
   Kim EJ, 2016, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V82, P418, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2016.1218736
   Kjellstrom T, 2016, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V37, P97, DOI 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021740
   Knittel N, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V160, P251, DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02661-1
   Lange S, 2018, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V9, P627, DOI 10.5194/esd-9-627-2018
   Martinich J, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P397, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0444-6
   Mignot J, 2013, CLIM DYNAM, V40, P2089, DOI 10.1007/s00382-013-1720-1
   Shindell DT, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P503, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2935, 10.1038/nclimate2935]
   Stohl A, 2015, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V15, P10529, DOI 10.5194/acp-15-10529-2015
   Szewczyk W., 2019, Economic implications of future heat stress on Labour Productivity 22nd Conference on Global Economic Analysis
   Taylor KE, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P485, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
   U.S. EPA, 2017, EPA600R16366F US EPA
   U.S. EPA, 2017, 430R17001 US EPA EPA
   van Vuuren DP, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.008
   Warszawski L, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3228, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1312330110
   Watanabe S, 2011, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V4, P845, DOI 10.5194/gmd-4-845-2011
   Watts N, 2019, LANCET, V394, P1836, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32596-6
   Watts N, 2018, LANCET, V392, P2479, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32594-7
   Wuebbles D.J., 2018, Climate science special report: fourth national climate assessment, Vi
   Zivin JG, 2014, J LABOR ECON, V32, P1, DOI 10.1086/671766
NR 37
TC 23
Z9 24
U1 10
U2 43
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 0165-0009
EI 1573-1480
J9 CLIMATIC CHANGE
JI Clim. Change
PD FEB
PY 2021
VL 164
IS 3-4
AR 35
DI 10.1007/s10584-021-03014-2
PG 18
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA QF2US
UT WOS:000616755800001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Revord, RS
   Lovell, ST
   Brown, P
   Capik, J
   Molnar, TJ
AF Revord, Ronald S.
   Lovell, Sarah T.
   Brown, Patrick
   Capik, John
   Molnar, Thomas J.
TI Using genotyping-by-sequencing derived SNPs to examine the genetic
   structure and identify a core set of<i>Corylus americana</i>germplasm
SO TREE GENETICS & GENOMES
LA English
DT Article
DE Corylus americana; Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS); Genetic diversity;
   Germplasm structure; Discriminant analysis of principal components
   (DAPC); Core collection
ID EASTERN FILBERT BLIGHT; HAZELNUT; RESISTANCE; TOOLS
AB The American hazelnut (Corylus americana) is native to a broad range of the eastern United States and southern Canada. It is the endemic host of the fungusAnisogramma anomala, which causes eastern filbert blight (EFB) disease and limits European hazelnut (C. avellana) production in eastern North America. WhileC. americanahas thick-shelled, tiny nuts not suited for commercial production, it is cold hardy, highly tolerant of EFB, and phenotypically diverse. Previous studies with simple sequence repeat markers show that it is also genetically diverse. Further, the species is cross-compatible withC. avellanaand is thus a valuable donor of EFB resistance and climate adaptability traits. However, only a narrow set ofC. americanaparents has been used in interspecific hybridizations, and current germplasm availability likely does not fully represent the species' genetic diversity, given its vast range. A new collection of open-pollinatedC. americanaseed was assembled at Rutgers University to broaden available genetic resources. Here, we study the genetic diversity and population structure of 272 of these individuals, which represent 55 seedlots from across 15 states of the species' native range. We use multivariate analyses to examine the distribution of genetic variation within the collection and to support the identification of a core set. A genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach yielded 2653 single nucleotide polymorphisms and subsequent analyses revealed a collection with high estimates of heterozygosity (H-E = 0.276,H-O = 0.280), moderate differentiation (F-ST = 0.108) and low inbreeding (F-IS = -0.136). Bayesian model-based and neighbor-joining (NJ) clustering corroborate an uppermost grouping ofK = 3, with the NJ dendrogram depicting many small subgroups equally distant from common ancestry. Discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) reveals between-subgroup variation (K = 15) within the NJ dendrogram and allows the identification of 19 consensus subgroups. In general, our results support the assembly of a genetically diverse collection where a majority of the variation is explained at the genotype and subgroup levels, which aligns with previous studies ofC. americana. Fifty-one accessions were identified that represent 95% of the observed allelic variation. These genotypes are suggested for inclusion in a core collection, which, when coupled to concurrent phenotypic evaluations, will aid in genetic resource assembly that preserves unique phenotypes and retains genetic variation.
C1 [Revord, Ronald S.; Lovell, Sarah T.] Univ Missouri, Ctr Agroforestry, Sch Nat Resources, Anheuser Busch Nat Resources Bldg,1111 Rollins St, Columbia, MO 65201 USA.
   [Brown, Patrick] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
   [Capik, John; Molnar, Thomas J.] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Plant Biol, Foran Hall,59 Dudley Rd, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA.
C3 University of Missouri System; University of Missouri Columbia;
   University of California System; University of California Davis; Rutgers
   University System; Rutgers University New Brunswick
RP Revord, RS (corresponding author), Univ Missouri, Ctr Agroforestry, Sch Nat Resources, Anheuser Busch Nat Resources Bldg,1111 Rollins St, Columbia, MO 65201 USA.
EM r.revord@missouri.edu
RI Brown, Patrick/E-4085-2012; Capik, John/AAD-3416-2021; Molnar,
   Thomas/AAC-1429-2021; Lovell, Sarah/H-4478-2013
OI Lovell, Sarah/0000-0001-8857-409X; Brown, Patrick/0000-0003-1332-711X;
   Molnar, Thomas/0000-0001-6099-4244
FU USDA/ARS Dale Bumpers Small Farm Research Center from the USDA
   Agricultural Research Service [58-6020-6-001]; University of Missouri
   Center for Agroforestry; Institute for Sustainable Energy and
   Environment at the University of Illinois; New Jersey Agricultural
   Experiment Station, Hatch Act Funds; U.S. Department of Agriculture
   National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Agriculture and Food
   Research Initiative Competitive Grant) [2014-67013-22421]; U.S.
   Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture
   (Specialty Crops Research Initiative Competitive Grants) [2016-04991,
   2009-51181]
FX This work is supported by the USDA/ARS Dale Bumpers Small Farm Research
   Center, Agreement number 58-6020-6-001 from the USDA Agricultural
   Research Service and the University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry;
   by the Institute for Sustainable Energy and Environment at the
   University of Illinois and Melissa Meador; by the New Jersey
   Agricultural Experiment Station, Hatch Act Funds, and the U.S.
   Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture
   (Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant
   2014-67013-22421 and the Specialty Crops Research Initiative Competitive
   Grants 2016-04991 and 2009-51181).
CR [Anonymous], 2018, ACTA HORTICULTURAE, DOI [10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1226.1, DOI 10.17660/ACTAH0RTIC.2018.1226.1]
   Bhattarai G, 2017, TREE GENET GENOMES, V13, DOI 10.1007/s11295-017-1129-9
   Brown JA, 2016, TREE GENET GENOMES, V12, DOI 10.1007/s11295-016-1079-7
   Capik JM, 2012, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V137, P157, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.137.3.157
   Chen H, 2007, HORTSCIENCE, V42, P466, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.42.3.466
   Crane H.L., 1937, YB AGR, P835
   Demchik M., 2011, Univ. Wisconsin Ext. Res. Bul, V17
   Demchik M, 2018, AGROFOREST SYST, V92, P1507, DOI 10.1007/s10457-017-0097-2
   Drumke J, 1964, THESIS
   Earl DA, 2012, CONSERV GENET RESOUR, V4, P359, DOI 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7
   Elshire RJ, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019379
   Erdogan V, 2000, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V125, P489, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.125.4.489
   Evanno G, 2005, MOL ECOL, V14, P2611, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
   FAOSTAT, 2017, AGR PROD CROPS
   Gleason HenryA., 1963, MANUAL VASCULAR PLAN
   Goudet J, 2020, HIERFSTAT ESTIMATION
   Hammond E., 2006, THESIS
   Jeong S, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0181420
   Johnson K.B., 2002, Compendium of nut crop diseases in temperate zones, P44
   Jombart T., 2010, BMC GENET, V11, P94, DOI 10.1186/1471-2156-11-94
   Jombart T, 2011, BIOINFORMATICS, V27, P3070, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr521
   Li H, 2009, BIOINFORMATICS, V25, P1754, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
   Lischer HEL, 2012, BIOINFORMATICS, V28, P298, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr642
   Lunde CF, 2000, HORTSCIENCE, V35, P729, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.35.4.729
   Martins S, 2015, PLANT MOL BIOL REP, V33, P1712, DOI 10.1007/s11105-015-0867-9
   Mehlenbacher SA, 1991, HAZELNUTS CORYLUS, P789
   Mehlenbacher SA, 2019, HORTSCIENCE, V54, P1429, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI14089-19
   Mehlenbacher SA, 2014, HORTSCIENCE, V49, P346, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.49.3.346
   Mehlenbacher SA, 2011, HORTSCIENCE, V46, P662, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.46.4.662
   Melo ATO, 2016, BMC BIOINFORMATICS, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12859-016-0879-y
   Molnar T. J., 2018, Acta Horticulturae, P79, DOI 10.17660/actahortic.2018.1226.11
   Molnar T. J., 2012, Acta Horticulturae, P57
   Molnar T.J., 2011, Wild crop relatives: Genomic and breeding resources, forest trees, P15, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-21250-5_2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21250-5_2]
   Molnar TJ, 2012, HORTSCIENCE, V47, P1412, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.47.10.1412
   Molnar TJ, 2005, ACTA HORTIC, P609, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.686.81
   Molnar TJ, 2018, ACTA HORTIC, V1226, P115
   Muehlbauer MF, 2014, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V139, P399, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.139.4.399
   Öztürk SC, 2017, TREE GENET GENOMES, V13, DOI 10.1007/s11295-017-1195-z
   Peakall R, 2006, MOL ECOL NOTES, V6, P288, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x
   Poland JA, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032253
   Popescu AA, 2012, BIOINFORMATICS, V28, P1536, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts184
   Pritchard JK., 2003, DOCUMENTATION STRUCT
   Reed CA, 1936, J HERED, V27, P427
   Revord RS, 2020, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V145, P162, DOI 10.21273/JASHS04732-19
   Rutter M., 1991, Annu. Rpt. Northern Nut Growers Assn, V82, P159
   Rutter P.A., 1987, Annu. Rpt. Northern Nut Growers Assn, V78, P173
   Sathuvalli VR, 2012, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V59, P1055, DOI 10.1007/s10722-011-9743-0
   Slate GL, 1969, HDB N AM NUT TREES, P287
   Thompson M. M., 1996, Fruit Breeding, VIII, P125, DOI DOI 10.1093/0XF0RDJ0URNALS.JHERED.A110035
   Weschcke C, 1953, GROWING NUTS N
   Yang Z, 2018, BRAZ J BOT, V41, P687, DOI 10.1007/s40415-018-0466-8
   Zong JW, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0137528
NR 52
TC 6
Z9 9
U1 1
U2 9
PU SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
PI HEIDELBERG
PA TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
SN 1614-2942
EI 1614-2950
J9 TREE GENET GENOMES
JI Tree Genet. Genomes
PD AUG 13
PY 2020
VL 16
IS 5
AR 65
DI 10.1007/s11295-020-01462-y
PG 11
WC Forestry; Genetics & Heredity; Horticulture
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry; Genetics & Heredity; Agriculture
GA MZ7VG
UT WOS:000559334300001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU García, JT
   Arroyo, BE
AF García, JT
   Arroyo, BE
TI Effect of abiotic factors on reproduction in the centre and periphery of
   breeding ranges:: a comparative analysis in sympatric harriers
SO ECOGRAPHY
LA English
DT Article
ID GEOGRAPHIC RANGE; ABUNDANCE; CONSERVATION; POPULATION; BOUNDARIES;
   DYNAMICS; RED
AB Variables such as weather or other abiotic factors should have a higher influence on demographic rates in border areas than in central areas, given that climatic adaptation might be important in determining range borders. Similarly, for a given area, the relationship between weather and reproduction should be dissimilar for species which are in the centre of their breeding range and those that are near the edge. We tested this hypothesis on two sympatric ground-nesting raptors, the hen harrier Circus cyaneus and the Montagu's harrier Circus pygargus in Madrid, central Spain, where the hen harrier is at the southern edge of its breeding range in the western Palearctic and the Montagu's harrier is central in its distribution. We examined the reproductive success of both species during an 8-yr period, and looked at the influence of the most stressful abiotic factors in the study area (between-year variation in rainfall and within-year variation in temperature) on reproductive parameters.
   In the hen harrier, low levels of rainfall during the breeding season had a negative influence on annual fledging success and thus on population fledgling production. The relationship between rainfall and reproduction was probably mediated through food abundance, which in Mediterranean habitat depends directly on rainfall levels. In the Montagu's harrier, no negative effect of dry seasons on productivity was found. Additionally, in the hen harrier, the proportion of eggs that did not hatch in each clutch increased with higher temperatures during the incubation period. No such relationship was found in the Montagu's harrier. We interpret these between-species differences in terms of differences of breeding range and adaptations to the average conditions existing there. Hen harriers, commonest at northern latitudes, are probably best adapted to the most typical conditions at those latitudes, and have probably not developed thermoregulatory or behavioural mechanisms to cope with drought and high temperatures in Mediterranean habitats, in contrast to Montagu's harrier. Thus hen harrier distribution might be constrained by these variables, due to lower reproductive success or higher reproductive costs. Accordingly, a logistic regression analysis of the presence or absence of both species in 289 random points throughout the western Palearctic showed that the distribution of both species was related to temperature, but the relationship was in opposite directions for the two species: hen harriers had lower probability of breeding in areas with higher temperature (as expected in a species with a more northerly distribution).
C1 Univ Complutense, Fac Biol, Dept Biol Anim Zool 1, E-28040 Madrid, Spain.
   CNRS, Ctr Etud Biol Chize, F-79360 Villiers en Bois, France.
C3 Complutense University of Madrid; Centre National de la Recherche
   Scientifique (CNRS)
RP García, JT (corresponding author), Univ Complutense, Fac Biol, Dept Biol Anim Zool 1, E-28040 Madrid, Spain.
RI GARCIA, JESUS/M-1503-2014; Arroyo, Beatriz/A-3504-2013
OI GARCIA, JESUS/0000-0003-4126-9658; Arroyo, Beatriz/0000-0002-4657-6609
CR [Anonymous], 1992, ESTEPAS IBERICAS
   [Anonymous], 1994, Handbook of the birds of the World: New World Vultures to Guinea fowl
   [Anonymous], 1954, The distribution and abundance of animals, DOI DOI 10.1111/BRV
   [Anonymous], 2001, Biostatistical analysis
   [Anonymous], 1982, Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity
   [Anonymous], 1988, SAS STAT USERS GUIDE
   [Anonymous], CONSERVACION AVES ES
   Arroyo B., 1995, PhD thesis
   ARROYO BE, 1997, IBIS, V139, P964
   Borralho R, 1998, IBIS, V140, P620, DOI 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1998.tb04707.x
   Brown J.H., 1985, Macroecology
   Brown JH, 1996, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V27, P597, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.597
   BROWN JH, 1984, AM NAT, V124, P255, DOI 10.1086/284267
   CAUGHLEY G, 1988, J ANIM ECOL, V57, P771, DOI 10.2307/5092
   Cramp S., 1980, The Birds of the Western Palearctic, VVolume II
   DAWSON WR, 1973, COMP BIOCH PHYSL, V227, P1038
   Elkins N., 1983, Weather and Bird Behaviour
   Fjeldsa J, 1997, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V6, P401, DOI 10.1023/A:1018364708207
   GRANT GS, 1982, ORNITHOL MONOGR, V30
   Hagemeijer W. J. M., 1997, The EBCC atlas of European breeding birds: their distribution and abundance
   HANSKI I, 1982, OIKOS, V38, P210, DOI 10.2307/3544021
   Harrison CJ., 1982, ATLAS BIRDS W PALEAR
   Herrera C.M., 1980, Donana Acta Vertebrata, V7, P1
   HERSTEINSSON P, 1992, OIKOS, V64, P505, DOI 10.2307/3545168
   HOFFMANN AA, 1994, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V9, P223, DOI 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90248-8
   KENDEIGH SC, 1974, COMP BIOCHEM PHYSIOL, V48, P175
   KREBS CJ, 1985, ECOLOGY EXPT ANAL DI
   LAWTON JH, 1993, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V8, P409, DOI 10.1016/0169-5347(93)90043-O
   Lawton JH, 1996, BIRD STUDY, V43, P3, DOI 10.1080/00063659609460991
   LESICA P, 1995, CONSERV BIOL, V9, P753, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09040753.x
   Lucio Antonio J., 1990, Ardeola, V37, P207
   MACARTHUR RH, 1958, ECOLOGY, V39, P599, DOI 10.2307/1931600
   Mehlman DW, 1997, ECOL APPL, V7, P614
   Mooney HA., 1981, Ecosystems of the World Vol. II. Mediterranean-type shrublands, VII, P249
   Newton I., 1998, POPULATION LIMITATIO
   PEINADO M, 1987, VEGETACION ESPANA PO
   PIMM SL, 1988, AM NAT, V132, P757, DOI 10.1086/284889
   RANDALL MGM, 1982, J ANIM ECOL, V51, P993, DOI 10.2307/4018
   ROGERS DJ, 1986, J ANIM ECOL, V55, P1007, DOI 10.2307/4430
   ROOT T, 1988, J BIOGEOGR, V15, P489, DOI 10.2307/2845278
   ROTENBERRY JT, 1991, ECOLOGY, V72, P1325, DOI 10.2307/1941105
   SAUNDERS MB, 1989, CAN J ZOOL, V67, P1824, DOI 10.1139/z89-259
   SCHARF WC, 1971, IBIS, V113, P323, DOI 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1971.tb05162.x
   Schipper W.J.A., 1973, Gerfaut, V63, P17
   SCHIPPER WJA, 1978, ARDEA, V66, P77
   Soriguer R C., 1981, Donana Acta Vertebrata, V8, P1
   WARD D, 1990, AUK, V107, P10
   WASSER JS, 1986, CONDOR, V88, P57, DOI 10.2307/1367753
   WEATHERS WW, 1979, OECOLOGIA, V42, P81, DOI 10.1007/BF00347620
   WEBB DR, 1987, CONDOR, V89, P874, DOI 10.2307/1368537
   WINK M, 1982, J ORNITHOL, V123, P401, DOI 10.1007/BF01643273
   WINK VM, 1980, VOGELWARTE, V30, P320
NR 52
TC 61
Z9 70
U1 0
U2 26
PU MUNKSGAARD INT PUBL LTD
PI COPENHAGEN
PA 35 NORRE SOGADE, PO BOX 2148, DK-1016 COPENHAGEN, DENMARK
SN 0906-7590
J9 ECOGRAPHY
JI Ecography
PD AUG
PY 2001
VL 24
IS 4
BP 393
EP 402
DI 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.d01-195.x
PG 10
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 485KJ
UT WOS:000171753300003
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Katragkou, E
   Sobolowski, SP
   Teichmann, C
   Solmon, F
   Pavlidis, V
   Rechid, D
   Hoffmann, P
   Fernandez, J
   Nikulin, G
   Jacob, D
AF Katragkou, E.
   Sobolowski, S. P.
   Teichmann, C.
   Solmon, F.
   Pavlidis, V.
   Rechid, D.
   Hoffmann, P.
   Fernandez, J.
   Nikulin, G.
   Jacob, D.
TI Delivering an Improved Framework for the New Generation of CMIP6-Driven
   EURO-CORDEX Regional Climate Simulations
SO BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Europe; Climate; Regional models
ID RESOLUTION LAND-USE; COVER DATASET; MODEL; AEROSOLS; SCALES; IMPACT;
   AFFORESTATION; TEMPERATURE; SENSITIVITY
AB The Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) is a coordinated international activity that has produced ensembles of regional climate simulations with domains that cover all land areas of the world. These ensembles are used by a wide range of practitioners that include the scientific community, policymakers, and stakeholders from the public and private sectors. They also provide the scientific basis for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change-Assessment Reports. As its next phase now launches, the CMIP6-CORDEX datasets are expected to populate community repositories over the next couple of years, with updated state-of-the-art regional climate data that will further support national and regional communities and inform their climate adaptation and mitigation strategies. The protocol presented here focuses on the European domain (EURO-CORDEX). It takes the international CORDEX protocol covering all 14 global domains as its template. However, it expands on the international protocol in specific areas; incorporates historical and projected aerosol trends into the regional models in a consistent way with CMIP6 global climate models, to allow for a better comparison of global versus regional trends; produces more climate variables to better support sectorial climate impact assessments; and takes into account the recent scientific developments addressed in the CORDEX Flagship Pilot Studies, enabling a better assessment of processes and phenomena relevant to regional climate (e.g., land-use change, aerosol, convection, and urban environment). Here, we summarize the scientific analysis which led to the new simulation protocol and highlight the improvements we expect in the new generation regional climate ensemble. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: As climate change affects all aspects of human life, it is imperative to have access to high-quality state-of-the-art regional climate data in order to serve emergent societal needs. A high level of coordination and a design protocol are required, when large climate model datasets are produced, with the aim to be used by a broader community of scientists and stakeholders. In this work, we present the framework within which the next generation of regional climate model simulations over Europe will be produced. We provide the relevant scientific background, underlying the decisions taken to form the protocol and the improvements we expect in comparison with the previous data repository. This work aims to provide valuable information and guidance to the users of regional climate data produced within the European Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment (EURO-CORDEX).
C1 [Katragkou, E.; Pavlidis, V.] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Geol, Dept Meteorol & Climatol, Thessaloniki, Greece.
   [Sobolowski, S. P.] Univ Bergen, Geophys Inst, Bjerknes Ctr Climate Res, Bergen, Norway.
   [Teichmann, C.; Rechid, D.; Hoffmann, P.; Jacob, D.] Helmholtz Zentrum Hereon, Climate Serv Ctr Germany GERICS, Hamburg, Germany.
   [Solmon, F.] Univ Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Lab Aerol, CNRS, Toulouse, France.
   [Fernandez, J.] Univ Cantabria, Inst Fis Cantabria, CSIC, Santander, Spain.
   [Nikulin, G.] Swedish Meteorol & Hydrol Inst, Rossby Ctr, Norrkoping, Sweden.
C3 Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; University of Bergen; Bjerknes
   Centre for Climate Research; Helmholtz Association; Helmholtz-Zentrum
   Hereon; Universite de Toulouse; Universite Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier;
   Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); LAERO; Consejo
   Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC); Universidad de
   Cantabria; CSIC - Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria (IFCA); Swedish
   Meteorological & Hydrological Institute
RP Katragkou, E (corresponding author), Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Geol, Dept Meteorol & Climatol, Thessaloniki, Greece.
EM katragou@geo.auth.gr
RI Hoffmann, Peter/KYC-1568-2024; Fernandez, Jesus/H-4894-2015; Fernandez,
   Jesus/F-5189-2011
OI Solmon, Fabien/0000-0002-0700-0519; Fernandez,
   Jesus/0000-0001-8269-1893; Katragkou, Eleni/0000-0003-0863-3411;
   Fernandez, Jesus/0000-0002-3483-0008
FU European Union-NextGenerationEU [14696]; MCIN/AEI [PID2020-116595RB-I00]
FX We acknowledge the contribution of all EURO-CORDEX modelers to all EURO-
   CORDEX General Assemblies and Workshops. The analysis of MERRA-2 aerosol
   was granted access to the HPC resources of the CALMIP supercomputing
   center under the allocation 2021- p21030. E.K. acknowledges that her
   research is implemented in the framework of H.F.R.I call "Basic research
   Financing (Horizontal support of all Sciences) " under the National
   Recovery and Resilience Plan "Greece 2.0" funded by the European
   Union-NextGenerationEU (H.F.R.I. Project Number:14696) . J. F.
   acknowledges support from project CORDyS (PID2020-116595RB-I00) funded
   by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033.
CR [Anonymous], 2015, MERRA-2 inst3_3d_aer_Nv: 3d, 3-Hourly, Instantaneous, Model-Level, Assimilation, DOI DOI 10.5067/LTVB4GPCOTK2
   Ban N, 2021, CLIM DYNAM, V57, P275, DOI 10.1007/s00382-021-05708-w
   Bartók B, 2017, CLIM DYNAM, V49, P2665, DOI 10.1007/s00382-016-3471-2
   Boé J, 2020, CLIM DYNAM, V54, P2981, DOI 10.1007/s00382-020-05153-1
   Breil M, 2020, J CLIMATE, V33, P9159, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0624.1
   Buchard V, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P6851, DOI [10.1175/jcli-d-16-0613.1, 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0613.1]
   CH2018, 2018, CH2018 CLIMATE SCENA
   Chin M, 2002, J ATMOS SCI, V59, P461, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<0461:TAOTFT>2.0.CO;2
   Colarco P, 2010, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V115, DOI 10.1029/2009JD012820
   Colarco PR, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V119, P753, DOI 10.1002/2013JD020046
   Coppola E, 2020, CLIM DYNAM, V55, P3, DOI 10.1007/s00382-018-4521-8
   CORDEX, 2021, CORDEX experiment design for dynamical downscaling of CMIP6
   Daloz AS, 2022, CRYOSPHERE, V16, P2403, DOI 10.5194/tc-16-2403-2022
   Davin EL, 2020, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V11, P183, DOI 10.5194/esd-11-183-2020
   Davin EL, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P9757, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1317323111
   Diez-Sierra J, 2022, B AM METEOROL SOC, V103, pE2804, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0111.1
   Drugé T, 2021, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V21, P7639, DOI 10.5194/acp-21-7639-2021
   EURO-CORDEX, 2022, EURO-CORDEX-CMIP6 atmosphere variable list (v1.0), DOI [10.5281/zenodo.8414798, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.8414798]
   EURO-CORDEX, 2023, EURO-CORDEX-CMIP6 RCM component description, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.8388778, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.8388778]
   Eyring V, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P1937, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
   Giorgi F., 2009, Bulletin - World Meteorological Organization, V58, P175
   Giorgi F, 2022, B AM METEOROL SOC, V103, pE293, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0119.1
   Giorgi F, 2015, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V40, P467, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021217
   Gutiérrez C, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6666
   Gutirrez JM., 2021, Atlas, P1927, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009157896.021
   Hersbach H, 2020, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V146, P1999, DOI 10.1002/qj.3803
   Hoffmann P, 2023, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V15, P3819, DOI 10.5194/essd-15-3819-2023
   Huang B, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-14890-0
   Hurtt GC, 2020, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V13, P5425, DOI 10.5194/gmd-13-5425-2020
   Jacob D, 2020, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V20, DOI 10.1007/s10113-020-01606-9
   Jacob D, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P563, DOI 10.1007/s10113-013-0499-2
   Katragkou E, 2015, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V8, P603, DOI 10.5194/gmd-8-603-2015
   Kotlarski S, 2014, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V7, P1297, DOI 10.5194/gmd-7-1297-2014
   MassonDelmotte V., 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE 2021, P2391, DOI [10.1017/9781009157896, DOI 10.1017/9781009157896]
   Meinshausen M, 2020, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V13, P3571, DOI 10.5194/gmd-13-3571-2020
   Mooney PA, 2020, TELLUS A, V72, DOI 10.1080/16000870.2020.1853437
   Mooney PA, 2022, CRYOSPHERE, V16, P1383, DOI 10.5194/tc-16-1383-2022
   Nabat P, 2015, CLIM DYNAM, V44, P1127, DOI 10.1007/s00382-014-2205-6
   Nabat P, 2014, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V41, P5605, DOI 10.1002/2014GL060798
   NCCS, 2017, NCCS Rep. 1/2017
   O'Neill BC, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P387, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2
   Pavlidis V, 2020, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V13, P2511, DOI 10.5194/gmd-13-2511-2020
   Randles CA, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P6823, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0609.1
   Rechid D., 2017, Geophysical Research Abstracts, V19
   Reinhart V, 2021, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102221
   Reinhart V, 2022, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V14, P1735, DOI 10.5194/essd-14-1735-2022
   Sobolowski S., 2024, EURO-CORDEX CMIP6 GCM selection and ensemble design: Best practices and recommendations
   Sofiadis G, 2022, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V15, P595, DOI 10.5194/gmd-15-595-2022
   Solmon F., 2022, Aerosol optical properties from merra 2 reanalysis, DOI [10.25326/383, DOI 10.25326/383]
   Stevens B, 2017, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V10, P433, DOI 10.5194/gmd-10-433-2017
   van Vuuren DP, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P5, DOI [10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z, 10.1007/s10584-011-0157-y]
   Vautard R, 2013, CLIM DYNAM, V41, P2555, DOI 10.1007/s00382-013-1714-z
NR 52
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 3
U2 5
PU AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
PI BOSTON
PA 45 BEACON ST, BOSTON, MA 02108-3693, UNITED STATES
SN 0003-0007
EI 1520-0477
J9 B AM METEOROL SOC
JI Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc.
PD JUN
PY 2024
VL 105
IS 6
DI 10.1175/BAMS-D-23-0131.1
PG 13
WC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA UM6U9
UT WOS:001248525200001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Tewari, K
   Tewari, M
   Niyogi, D
AF Tewari, Kushagra
   Tewari, Mukul
   Niyogi, Dev
TI Need for considering urban climate change factors on stroke,
   neurodegenerative diseases, and mood disorders studies
SO COMPUTATIONAL URBAN SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban heat island; Climate change; Neuropathologies; Neurodegenerative
   diseases; Neuroinflammation; Urban climate; Bioclimatology
ID HEAT; IMPACTS; HEALTH; BRAIN
AB The adverse health impacts of climate change have been well documented. It is increasingly apparent that the impacts are disproportionately higher in urban populations, especially underserved communities. Studies have linked urbanization and air pollution with health impacts, but the exacerbating role of urban heat islands (UHI) in the context of neurodegenerative diseases has not been well addressed. The complex interplay between climate change, local urban air pollution, urbanization, and a rising population in cities has led to the byproduct of increased heat stress in urban areas. Some urban neighborhoods with poor infrastructure can have excessive heat even after sunset, increasing internal body temperature and leading to hyperthermic conditions. Such conditions can put individuals at higher risk of stroke by creating a persistent neuroinflammatory state, including, in some instances, Alzheimer's Disease (AD) phenotypes. Components of the AD phenotype, such as amyloid beta plaques, can disrupt long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), which can negatively alter the mesolimbic function and thus contribute to the pathogenesis of mood disorders. Furthermore, although a link has not previously been established between heat and Parkinson's Disease (PD), it can be postulated that neuroinflammation and cell death can contribute to mitochondrial dysfunction and thus lead to Lewy Body formation, which is a hallmark of PD. Such postulations are currently being presented in the emerging field of 'neurourbanism'. This study highlights that: (i) the impact of urban climate, air pollution and urbanization on the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases and mood disorders is an area that needs further investigation; (ii) urban climate- health studies need to consider the heterogeneity in the urban environment and the impact it has on the UHI. In that, a clear need exists to go beyond the use of airport-based representative climate data to a consideration of more spatially explicit, high-resolution environmental datasets for such health studies, especially as they pertain to the development of locally-relevant climate adaptive health solutions. Recent advances in the development of super-resolution (downscaled climate) datasets using computational tools such as convolution neural networks (CNNs) and other machine learning approaches, as well as the emergence of urban field labs that generate spatially explicit temperature and other environmental datasets across different city neighborhoods, will continue to become important. Future climate - health studies need to develop strategies to benefit from such urban climate datasets that can aid the creation of localized, effective public health assessments and solutions.
C1 [Tewari, Kushagra] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Neurosci, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA.
   [Tewari, Mukul] Thomas J Watson Res Ctr, IBM, Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 USA.
   [Niyogi, Dev] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78705 USA.
C3 University of Southern California; International Business Machines
   (IBM); University of Texas System; University of Texas Austin
RP Tewari, K (corresponding author), Univ Southern Calif, Dept Neurosci, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA.
EM ktewari@usc.edu
RI Niyogi, Dev/H-6326-2013
OI Niyogi, Dev/0000-0002-1848-5080
FU Space Applications Center, Ahmedabad, India
FX The authors thank Dr. C.M. Kishtawal, Space Applications Center,
   Ahmedabad, India, and Dr. John Walsh, University of Southern California,
   Los Angeles, California, for their valuable comments.
CR Adli M, 2017, LANCET PSYCHIAT, V4, P183, DOI 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30371-6
   Ahima RS, 2020, J CLIN INVEST, V130, P559, DOI 10.1172/JCI135006
   Ancora LA, 2022, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V13, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.983352
   [Anonymous], 2014, WORLD URBANIZATION P, DOI [10.4054/DemRes.2005.12.9, DOI 10.4054/DEMRES.2005.12.9, 10.4054/demres.2005.12.9]
   Bongioanni P, 2021, ENVIRON RES, V201, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111511
   Bouchama A, 2007, ARCH INTERN MED, V167, P2170, DOI 10.1001/archinte.167.20.ira70009
   Bratman GN, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P8567, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1510459112
   Chauderlier A, 2017, METHODS MOL BIOL, V1523, P369, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6598-4_25
   Chin-Chan M, 2015, FRONT CELL NEUROSCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fncel.2015.00124
   Cianconi P, 2020, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00074
   Crous-Bou M, 2020, ENVIRON INT, V138, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105546
   de Labra C, 2021, FRONT SYST NEUROSCI, V15, DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2021.709337
   Favero-Filho LA, 2008, BRAZ J MED BIOL RES, V41, P1029, DOI 10.1590/S0100-879X2008001100014
   Fung KY, 2022, COMPUT URBAN SCI, V2, DOI 10.1007/s43762-022-00046-x
   Gaoua N, 2012, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V32, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.01.002
   Habibi L, 2014, BIOIMPACTS, V4, P167, DOI 10.15171/bi.2014.013
   Hansen A, 2008, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V116, P1369, DOI 10.1289/ehp.11339
   Hass AL, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13010117
   Hsu YL, 2011, EXP EYE RES, V93, P405, DOI 10.1016/j.exer.2011.06.005
   Kamath HG, 2024, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2205.12224
   Katschinski DA, 2004, NEWS PHYSIOL SCI, V19, P11, DOI 10.1152/nips.01403.2002
   Kumar H, 2012, INT J MOL SCI, V13, P10478, DOI 10.3390/ijms130810478
   Lambert KG, 2015, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V58, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.04.007
   Lee MY, 2011, BIOCHEM BIOPH RES CO, V416, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.10.140
   Lenzuni P, 2014, INT J HYPERTHER, V30, P250, DOI 10.3109/02656736.2014.922222
   Liang X, 2018, B AM METEOROL SOC, V99, P1391, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0178.1
   Mills G, 2022, PROG PHYS GEOG, V46, P649, DOI 10.1177/03091333221107212
   Mirzaei N.F., 2015, Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol, V11, P454, DOI [10.19026/rjaset.11.1802, DOI 10.19026/RJASET.11.1802]
   Miskowiak KW, 2019, CNS SPECTRUMS, V24, P30, DOI 10.1017/S1092852918001062
   Mondschein A, 2018, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V84, P263, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2018.1526644
   de Snyder VNS, 2011, J URBAN HEALTH, V88, P1183, DOI 10.1007/s11524-011-9609-y
   Oke T.R., 1979, World Meteorological Organization Technical Note: No. 169, P100
   Ortiz LE, 2018, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V57, P837, DOI 10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0125.1
   Pal JS, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P197, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2833, 10.1038/nclimate2833]
   Pykett J, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V110, P1936, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1736982
   Qi XM, 2020, RISK MANAG HEALTHC P, V13, P615, DOI 10.2147/RMHP.S253559
   Rodriguez-Loureiro L, 2022, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V21, DOI 10.1186/s12940-022-00863-x
   Russo SJ, 2013, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V14, P609, DOI 10.1038/nrn3381
   Ruszkiewicz JA, 2019, ENVIRON RES, V177, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108637
   Scotland KB, 2023, CURR OPIN NEPHROL HY, V32, P103, DOI 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000845
   Shultz S, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0076750
   Sinigaglia-Coimbra R, 2002, ACTA NEUROPATHOL, V103, P444, DOI 10.1007/s00401-001-0487-3
   Sun LQ, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-19158-1
   Taylor L, 2016, FRONT PHYSIOL, V6, DOI 10.3389/fphys.2015.00372
   Tewari M., 2016, 7 C WEATH CLIM WAT N, P10
   Tewari M, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaf431
   Varquez ACG, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-66288-z
   Violet M, 2014, FRONT CELL NEUROSCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fncel.2014.00084
   Wang J, 2021, THER DRUG MONIT, V43, P69, DOI 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000818
   Ye XY, 2022, COMPUT URBAN SCI, V2, DOI 10.1007/s43762-022-00035-0
   Zammit C, 2021, EARLY HUM DEV, V155, DOI 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105217
   Zareba K, 2021, MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, V57, DOI 10.3390/medicina57111216
   Zhang X, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14153536
NR 53
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 10
U2 14
PU SPRINGERNATURE
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON, N1 9XW, ENGLAND
EI 2730-6852
J9 COMPUT URBAN SCI
JI Comput. Urban Sci.
PD JAN 30
PY 2023
VL 3
IS 1
AR 4
DI 10.1007/s43762-023-00079-w
PG 9
WC Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Regional & Urban
   Planning
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Computer Science; Public Administration
GA GW5S1
UT WOS:001155729400001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wu, YF
   Yao, ML
   Tang, YB
   Li, W
   Yu, T
   Ma, WL
   Geng, XJ
AF Wu, Yifan
   Yao, Minglei
   Tang, Yangbo
   Li, Wei
   Yu, Tao
   Ma, Wenlue
   Geng, Xiaojun
TI Assessing the Relative and Combined Effect of Climate and Land Use on
   Water-Related Ecosystem Services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt,
   China
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE ecosystem services; InVEST model; CASA model; relative and combined
   effects; Yangtze River Economic Belt
ID IMPACT
AB The ecosystem service (ES) is essential for residents' health and well-being. The ecosystem service value (ESV) is one of the measures to scientifically quantify the wealth of ESs. However, climate and human activities intensely affect the sustainability of ESs. Therefore, knowing the relative and combined effects of climate and human activities on ESs and ESV can be crucial. This study selects the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) as the study area to detect how climate and human activities affected the ES and ESV changes during 2001-2020, including net primary productivity, water yield, soil retention, water purification, and integrated ESV. The results show that the southern YREB has relatively higher ESs than the northern YREB, except for the NDR-P, which is mainly located in the urban agglomeration area. The general ranking for the ESV of different provinces in the YREB is sequenced from higher to lower as Sichuan, Yunnan, Hunan, Jiangxi, Guizhou, Hubei, Zhejiang, Anhui, Jiangsu, Chongqing, and Shanghai. Specifically, the ESV of Sichuan is the highest at about 972 billion yuan (133.57 billion USD), while the lowest ESV has been discovered in Shanghai at approximately 0.25 billion yuan (0.03 billion USD). It can be noticed that the regions where climate is the major influencing factor for ESs are concentrated upstream of the YREB, and human activities mainly influence ESs in highly urbanized areas. Furthermore, climate and human activities account for the highest proportion (86%) of synergistic effects for ESV in Yunnan. In contrast, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Shanghai accounted for the lowest proportions, at 18%, 26%, and 31%, respectively. This study may provide crucial insights into how ESs and ESV in the YREB have changed during the study period to inform policymakers, drawing more attention to the inhibitory and synergistic effects arising from the interaction between climate and human activities, to make more reliable decisions on adapting to climate crises in the future.
C1 [Wu, Yifan; Yao, Minglei; Tang, Yangbo; Li, Wei; Yu, Tao] Natl Engn Ctr Ecoenvironm Pan Yangtze Basin, Wuhan 430014, Peoples R China.
   [Wu, Yifan; Yao, Minglei; Tang, Yangbo; Li, Wei; Yu, Tao] China Three Gorges Corp, YANGTZE River Biodivers Res Ctr, Wuhan 430014, Peoples R China.
   [Ma, Wenlue] State Owned Assets Supervis & Adm Commiss State Co, Social Responsibil Bur, Beijing 100031, Peoples R China.
   [Geng, Xiaojun] Minist Water Resources, Gen Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Planning & D, Beijing 100032, Peoples R China.
C3 China Three Gorges Corporation
RP Li, W (corresponding author), Natl Engn Ctr Ecoenvironm Pan Yangtze Basin, Wuhan 430014, Peoples R China.; Li, W (corresponding author), China Three Gorges Corp, YANGTZE River Biodivers Res Ctr, Wuhan 430014, Peoples R China.
EM li_wei29@ctg.com.cn
RI tang, yangbo/HPC-5092-2023
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [U2040206]; China Three
   Gorges Corporation Research Project [NBWL202200489]
FX This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (Grant No. U2040206) and the China Three Gorges Corporation
   Research Project (NBWL202200489)
CR Babbar D, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V278, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123333
   Bai Y, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V102, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.079
   Benesty J., 2009, Dictionary of pharmaceutical medicine, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-00296-05, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-00296-05]
   Caro C, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106426
   Carrasco-Valencia L, 2024, WATER-SUI, V16, DOI 10.3390/w16050664
   Cheng X, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P11856, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-04384-y
   Costanza R, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V26, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
   Daily GC, 2000, SCIENCE, V289, P395, DOI 10.1126/science.289.5478.395
   Daily GC, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P9455, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0804960105
   Deng LY, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph191610230
   Foley JA, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P570, DOI 10.1126/science.1111772
   Guerry AD, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P7348, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1503751112
   Hasan SS, 2020, ENVIRON DEV, V34, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100527
   He QS, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V90, P392, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.030
   Huang GL, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16093741
   Kong LQ, 2023, NAT ECOL EVOL, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41559-023-02198-3
   Li Q, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109026
   Li YJ, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15021100
   Luo QL, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V676, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.135
   Luo R, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13192658
   Munang R, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.02.002
   Ouyang ZY., 1999, Chin. J. Appl. Ecol
   Peng L, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15020430
   Salata S, 2017, LAND-BASEL, V6, DOI 10.3390/land6030048
   Scholes RJ, 2016, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V7, P537, DOI 10.1002/wcc.404
   Sharma R, 2019, RESOURCES-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/resources8010018
   Sharp R., 2017, INVEST USERS GUIDE 3
   Shaw MR, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P465, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0313-4
   Sun L, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V326, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116753
   Vigerstol KL, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P2403, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.040
   Wang HH, 2024, ENVIRON POLLUT, V357, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124402
   Wang N, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110645
   Wu JW, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12020470
   Wu YF, 2023, WATER-SUI, V15, DOI 10.3390/w15050915
   Wu YF, 2021, HYDROL RES, V52, P1159, DOI 10.2166/nh.2021.146
   Wu YF, 2021, ECOL ENG, V159, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.106083
   Xiao PN, 2023, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V25, P6419, DOI 10.1007/s10668-022-02310-w
   Xu F, 2023, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/atmos14071161
   Xu XB, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V634, P1601, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.046
   Xu Y, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108425
   Yang YY, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V330, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129802
   Zhang X, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108304
   Zhu BF, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P14068, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-01190-2
NR 43
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 10
U2 10
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD AUG
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 15
AR 2126
DI 10.3390/w16152126
PG 18
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA C1N5F
UT WOS:001287098500001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Granata, F
   Di Nunno, F
   de Marinis, G
AF Granata, Francesco
   Di Nunno, Fabio
   de Marinis, Giovanni
TI Advanced evapotranspiration forecasting in Central Italy: Stacked MLP-RF
   algorithm and correlated Nystrom views with feature selection strategies
SO COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE
LA English
DT Article
DE Reference Evapotranspiration; Forecasting; Machine Learning; Feature
   Selection; Stacked Model; Correlated Nystrom Views
ID EXTREME LEARNING-MACHINE; LIMITED CLIMATIC DATA; NEURAL-NETWORK; MODELS
AB Evapotranspiration is a key parameter in hydrology, particularly in the field of water resources management. Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) stands as a crucial metric, embodying the influence of climate on water loss from both soil and plant surfaces. The accurate forecasting of future ETo values is paramount for informed decision -making in agricultural practices and water supply planning. The anticipation of evapotranspiration variations supports optimized irrigation, drought assessment, and efficient water allocation. Employing innovative algorithms, specifically the Multilayer Perceptron-Random Forest (MLP-RF) Stacked Model and the Correlated Nystrom Views (XNV), this study focuses on predicting ETo up to 60 days ahead in Agro Pontino, an area in Central Italy known for its flourishing agricultural production in the Mediterranean Europe. A Radial Basis Function (RBF) Neural Network serves as a benchmark. Taking into account firstly all available weatherclimatic variables and subsequently adopting two different strategies for reducing the variables, based respectively on Principal Component Analysis and feature selection using Particle Swarm Optimization, three distinct sets of input variables were considered. The models based on the complete set of exogenous climatic variables demonstrated superior accuracy. However, even models relying on only mean temperature, maximum relative humidity, and shortwave solar radiation as inputs produced good results, also for the 60 -day forecasting horizon, with Kling -Gupta Efficiency (KGE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) equal to 0.98 and 8.356 %, respectively, in the case of MLP-RF Stacked Model. The latter consistently outperformed XNV and RBF across various combinations of input variables and forecasting horizons. Notably, the reduction in accuracy with extended forecasting horizons was mild, suggesting the potential for accurate results over significantly more extended horizons. These forecasting models facilitate precise irrigation scheduling, minimizing water wastage and conserving resources. This targeted approach enhances crop yields, quality, and environmental sustainability, rendering agriculture economically viable and adaptable to climate variability.
C1 [Granata, Francesco; Di Nunno, Fabio; de Marinis, Giovanni] Univ Cassino & Southern Lazio, Dept Civil & Mech Engn DICEM, Via Di Biasio 43, I-03043 Frosinone, Italy.
C3 University of Cassino
RP Granata, F (corresponding author), Univ Cassino & Southern Lazio, Dept Civil & Mech Engn DICEM, Via Di Biasio 43, I-03043 Frosinone, Italy.
EM f.granata@unicas.it; fabio.dinunno@unicas.it; demarinis@unicas.it
RI GRANATA, Francesco/P-5197-2014
OI GRANATA, Francesco/0000-0002-2268-6600
CR Aghelpour P, 2022, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V36, P4133, DOI 10.1007/s00477-022-02249-4
   Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
   Bai Y, 2021, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V298, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108308
   Breiman Leo, 2001, MACH LEARN, V45, P5
   Chen ZJ, 2020, J HYDROL, V591, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125286
   Chen ZJ, 2020, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V169, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2019.105206
   Chia MY, 2020, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105577
   Cioffi F, 2017, HYDROL PROCESS, V31, P668, DOI 10.1002/hyp.11061
   Di Nunno F, 2023, GROUNDWATER SUST DEV, V23, DOI 10.1016/j.gsd.2023.101042
   Di Nunno F, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V890, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164323
   Dou XM, 2018, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V148, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2018.03.010
   Elzain HE, 2024, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V354, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120246
   Feng Y, 2017, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V136, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2017.01.027
   Ferreira LB, 2020, AGR WATER MANAGE, V234, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106113
   Gocic M, 2015, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V113, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2015.02.010
   Goyal P, 2023, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V209, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2023.107836
   Granata F, 2022, J HYDROL, V613, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128431
   Granata F, 2021, AGR WATER MANAGE, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107040
   Granata F, 2019, AGR WATER MANAGE, V217, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.015
   Hotelling H, 1933, J EDUC PSYCHOL, V24, P417, DOI 10.1037/h0071325
   Jia WB, 2023, PLOS ONE, V18, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0281478
   Kennedy J, 1995, 1995 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-6, P1942, DOI 10.1109/icnn.1995.488968
   Kisi O, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V263, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.08.007
   Laaboudi A, 2012, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V56, P831, DOI 10.1007/s00484-011-0485-7
   Landeras G, 2009, J IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V135, P323, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000008
   Luo YF, 2015, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V29, P3863, DOI 10.1007/s11269-015-1033-8
   Malik A, 2019, HYDROL RES, V50, P1623, DOI 10.2166/nh.2019.059
   Mandal N, 2023, J HYDROL, V620, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129418
   McWilliams B., 2013, Adv. Neural Inf. Proces. Syst., V26
   Murtagh F., 1991, Neurocomputing, V2, P183, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0925-2312(91)90023-5, 10.1016/0925-2312(91)90023-5]
   Nourani V, 2020, J HYDROL, V581, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124434
   Parisse B, 2023, DATA BRIEF, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108843
   Park J, 1991, NEURAL COMPUT, V3, P246, DOI 10.1162/neco.1991.3.2.246
   Pearson K, 1901, PHILOS MAG, V2, P559, DOI 10.1080/14786440109462720
   Pham QB, 2022, NEURAL COMPUT APPL, V34, P10751, DOI 10.1007/s00521-022-07009-7
   Sharma G, 2022, NEURAL COMPUT APPL, V34, P4013, DOI 10.1007/s00521-021-06661-9
   Tikhamarine Y, 2020, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V192, DOI 10.1007/s10661-020-08659-7
   Tikhamarine Y, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P30001, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-08792-3
   Tikhamarine Y, 2019, HYDROLOG SCI J, V64, P1824, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2019.1678750
   Torres AF, 2011, AGR WATER MANAGE, V98, P553, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.10.012
   Trajkovic S, 2003, J IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V129, P454, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2003)129:6(454)
   Traore S, 2016, AGR WATER MANAGE, V163, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.10.009
   Valipour M, 2023, AGR WATER MANAGE, V283, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108311
   Wen XH, 2015, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V29, P3195, DOI 10.1007/s11269-015-0990-2
   Xu TR, 2018, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V123, P8674, DOI 10.1029/2018JD028447
   Yamaç SS, 2020, AGR WATER MANAGE, V228, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105875
   Yu HJ, 2020, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V176, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105653
   Zhao L, 2021, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V190, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106424
   Zou H, 2005, J R STAT SOC B, V67, P301, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x
NR 49
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 13
U2 14
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0168-1699
EI 1872-7107
J9 COMPUT ELECTRON AGR
JI Comput. Electron. Agric.
PD MAY
PY 2024
VL 220
AR 108887
DI 10.1016/j.compag.2024.108887
EA MAR 2024
PG 14
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary; Computer Science, Interdisciplinary
   Applications
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Computer Science
GA PY0A6
UT WOS:001217510800001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Hollowed, AB
   Holsman, KK
   Haynie, AC
   Hermann, AJ
   Punt, AE
   Aydin, K
   Ianelli, JN
   Kasperski, S
   Cheng, W
   Faig, A
   Kearney, KA
   Reum, JCP
   Spencer, P
   Spies, I
   Stockhausen, W
   Szuwalski, CS
   Whitehouse, GA
   Wilderbuer, TK
AF Hollowed, Anne Babcock
   Holsman, Kirstin Kari
   Haynie, Alan C.
   Hermann, Albert J.
   Punt, Andre E.
   Aydin, Kerim
   Ianelli, James N.
   Kasperski, Stephen
   Cheng, Wei
   Faig, Amanda
   Kearney, Kelly A.
   Reum, Jonathan C. P.
   Spencer, Paul
   Spies, Ingrid
   Stockhausen, William
   Szuwalski, Cody S.
   Whitehouse, George A.
   Wilderbuer, Thomas K.
TI Integrated Modeling to Evaluate Climate Change Impacts on Coupled
   Social-Ecological Systems in Alaska
SO FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; fishery management strategy; Bering Sea; walleye
   pollock; Pacific cod; climate projections
ID EASTERN BERING-SEA; POLLOCK THERAGRA-CHALCOGRAMMA; WALLEYE POLLOCK;
   ECONOMIC-IMPACTS; BIAS CORRECTION; FUTURE CLIMATE; MANAGEMENT; FISHERY;
   OCEAN; RESPONSES
AB The Alaska Climate Integrated Modeling (ACLIM) project represents a comprehensive, multi-year, interdisciplinary effort to characterize and project climate-driven changes to the eastern Bering Sea (EBS) ecosystem, from physics to fishing communities. Results from the ACLIM project are being used to understand how different regional fisheries management approaches can help promote adaptation to climate-driven changes to sustain fish and shellfish populations and to inform managers and fishery dependent communities of the risks associated with different future climate scenarios. The project relies on iterative communications and outreaches with managers and fishery-dependent communities that have informed the selection of fishing scenarios. This iterative approach ensures that the research team focuses on policy relevant scenarios that explore realistic adaptation options for managers and communities. Within each iterative cycle, the interdisciplinary research team continues to improve: methods for downscaling climate models, climate-enhanced biological models, socio-economic modeling, and management strategy evaluation (MSE) within a common analytical framework. The evolving nature of the ACLIM framework ensures improved understanding of system responses and feedbacks are considered within the projections and that the fishing scenarios continue to reflect the management objectives of the regional fisheries management bodies. The multi-model approach used for projection of biological responses, facilitates the quantification of the relative contributions of climate forcing scenario, fishing scenario, parameter, and structural uncertainty with and between models. Ensemble means and variance within and between models inform risk assessments under different future scenarios. The first phase of projections of climate conditions to the end of the 21st century is complete, including projections of catch for core species under baseline (status quo) fishing conditions and two alternative fishing scenarios are discussed. The ACLIM modeling framework serves as a guide for multidisciplinary integrated climate impact and adaptation decision making in other large marine ecosystems.
C1 [Hollowed, Anne Babcock; Holsman, Kirstin Kari; Haynie, Alan C.; Aydin, Kerim; Ianelli, James N.; Kasperski, Stephen; Kearney, Kelly A.; Reum, Jonathan C. P.; Spencer, Paul; Spies, Ingrid; Stockhausen, William; Szuwalski, Cody S.; Wilderbuer, Thomas K.] NOAA, Alaska Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Seattle, WA 98115 USA.
   [Hermann, Albert J.; Cheng, Wei; Faig, Amanda; Kearney, Kelly A.; Whitehouse, George A.] Univ Washington, Joint Inst Study Atmosphere & Ocean, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.
   [Hermann, Albert J.; Cheng, Wei] NOAA, Pacific Marine Environm Lab, Oceans & Atmospher Res, 7600 Sand Point Way Ne, Seattle, WA 98115 USA.
   [Punt, Andre E.; Faig, Amanda; Whitehouse, George A.] Univ Washington, Coll Environm, Sch Aquat & Fishery Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.
   [Reum, Jonathan C. P.] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Marine Socioecol, Inst Marine & Antarctic Studies, Coll Sci & Engn, Hobart, Tas, Australia.
C3 National Oceanic Atmospheric Admin (NOAA) - USA; University of
   Washington; University of Washington Seattle; National Oceanic
   Atmospheric Admin (NOAA) - USA; University of Washington; University of
   Washington Seattle; University of Tasmania
RP Hollowed, AB (corresponding author), NOAA, Alaska Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Seattle, WA 98115 USA.
EM Anne.Hollowed@noaa.gov
RI Kearney, Kelly/A-8673-2014; Cheng, Wei/J-1030-2017; Stockhausen,
   William/AAR-1740-2021
OI Whitehouse, George/0000-0002-9130-9403; Stockhausen,
   William/0000-0003-3633-2157
FU Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean (JISAO) under
   NOAA [NA15OAR4320063, 2019-1043]; Fisheries and the Environment (FATE);
   Stock Assessment Analytical Methods (SAAM) Science and Technology North
   Pacific Climate Regimes and Ecosystem Productivity; Integrated Ecosystem
   Assessment Program (IEA); Economics and Human Dimensions Program; NOAA's
   Research Transition Acceleration Program (RTAP); Alaska Fisheries
   Science Center (ASFC); Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR);
   National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
FX Multiple NOAA National Marine Fisheries programs provided support for
   ACLIM including Fisheries and the Environment (FATE), Stock Assessment
   Analytical Methods (SAAM) Science and Technology North Pacific Climate
   Regimes and Ecosystem Productivity, the Integrated Ecosystem Assessment
   Program (IEA), the Economics and Human Dimensions Program, NOAA's
   Research Transition Acceleration Program (RTAP), the Alaska Fisheries
   Science Center (ASFC), the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research
   (OAR), and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). Additionally,
   the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) and the
   North Pacific Marine Science Organization (PICES) provided support for
   Strategic Initiative for the Study of Climate Impacts on Marine
   Ecosystems (SI-CCME) and the Strategic Initiative on the Human Dimension
   (SIHD) workshops, which facilitated development of the ideas presented
   in this manuscript. This publication is partially funded by the Joint
   Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean (JISAO) under NOAA
   Cooperative Agreement NA15OAR4320063, Contribution No. 2019-1043. This
   is IEA publication number 2019_9.
CR Abbott JK, 2012, ECOL APPL, V22, P762, DOI 10.1890/11-1319.1
   Allison EH, 2015, SCIENCE, V350, P778, DOI 10.1126/science.aac8721
   Anderson SC, 2017, FISH FISH, V18, P732, DOI 10.1111/faf.12200
   [Anonymous], 2016, Management Science in Fisheries: An Introduction to Simulation-Based Methods
   [Anonymous], REPORTS INT WHALING
   Arrigo KR, 2015, PROG OCEANOGR, V136, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.pocean.2015.05.002
   Aydin K. Y., 2007, A COMPARISON OF THE
   Bailey KM, 2000, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V198, P215, DOI 10.3354/meps198215
   Baker MR, 2014, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V109, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.03.001
   Barbeaux SJ, 2018, FISH OCEANOGR, V27, P1, DOI 10.1111/fog.12229
   Busch DS, 2016, MAR POLICY, V74, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.001
   Buser CM, 2009, CLIM DYNAM, V33, P849, DOI 10.1007/s00382-009-0588-6
   Cheng W, 2016, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V134, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.07.009
   Cheung W. W., 2019, Impacts of Climate Change on Fisheries and Aquaculture, P63
   Cheung WWL, 2016, ICES J MAR SCI, V73, P1283, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsv250
   Colenbrander DR, 2015, COAST MANAGE, V43, P270, DOI 10.1080/08920753.2015.1030321
   Comeau S, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011362
   Curchitser EN, 2005, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V110, DOI 10.1029/2005JC002902
   Dolan TE, 2016, ICES J MAR SCI, V73, P1042, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsv242
   Duffy-Anderson JT, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0178955
   Dunne JP, 2013, J CLIMATE, V26, P2247, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00150.1
   Fedewa E.J., 2019, Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report for BSAI Crab Stocks
   Fulton EA, 2019, FISH FISH, V20, P66, DOI 10.1111/faf.12324
   Gibson GA, 2011, J MARINE SYST, V88, P214, DOI 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2011.04.008
   Groeneveld RA, 2018, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V201, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.10.020
   Haerter JO, 2011, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V15, P1065, DOI 10.5194/hess-15-1065-2011
   Hare JA, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0146756
   Hawkins E, 2013, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V170, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.04.007
   Haynie AC, 2013, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V70, P841, DOI 10.1139/cjfas-2012-0265
   Haynie AC, 2012, ICES J MAR SCI, V69, P1160, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fss021
   Headache classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS), 2018, Cephalalgia, V38, P1, DOI [10.1177/0333102417738202, DOI 10.1177/0333102417738202, DOI 10.2833/9937]
   Heintz RA, 2013, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V94, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.04.006
   Hermann AJ, 2019, ICES J MAR SCI, V76, P1280, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsz043
   Hermann AJ, 2016, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V134, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.11.001
   Hermann AJ, 2013, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V94, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.04.007
   Hill SL, 2007, FISH FISH, V8, P315, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2007.00257.x
   Ho CK, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P21, DOI 10.1175/2011BAMS3110.1
   Hollowed AB, 2011, FISH FISH, V12, P189, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00413.x
   Hollowed AB, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V119, P111, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0641-z
   Holsman KK, 2019, ICES J MAR SCI, V76, P1368, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsz031
   Holsman KK, 2016, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V134, P360, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.08.001
   Hunt GL, 2011, ICES J MAR SCI, V68, P1230, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsr036
   Ianelli J, 2016, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V134, P379, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.04.002
   IPCC, 2018, GLOB WARM 1 5C SUMM
   Kaplan IC, 2019, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V617, P307, DOI 10.3354/meps12504
   Karp MA, 2019, ICES J MAR SCI, V76, P1305, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsz048
   Kasperski S, 2015, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V61, P517, DOI 10.1007/s10640-014-9805-9
   Kay JE, 2015, B AM METEOROL SOC, V96, P1333, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00255.1
   Kearney K., GEOSCI MODEL DEV, DOI [10.5194/gmd-2019-239, DOI 10.5194/GMD-2019-239]
   Kroetz K, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P4188, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1816545116
   Large WG, 2009, CLIM DYNAM, V33, P341, DOI 10.1007/s00382-008-0441-3
   Le Bris A, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P1831, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1711122115
   Lee YJ, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V121, P8635, DOI 10.1002/2016JC011993
   Levin PS, 2018, MAR POLICY, V92, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.01.019
   Livingston Patricia A., 2011, P113
   Long RD, 2015, MAR POLICY, V57, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.01.013
   Long WC, 2019, ICES J MAR SCI, V76, P1335, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsz090
   Long WC, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0060959
   Lotze HK, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P12907, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1900194116
   Merino G, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P795, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.03.003
   Murawski SA, 2010, ICES J MAR SCI, V67, P1, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsp221
   NPFMC, 2018, BERING SEA FISHERY E
   O'Neill BC, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P387, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2
   Olsen E, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0146467
   Ono K, 2018, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V75, P1185, DOI 10.1139/cjfas-2017-0135
   Ortiz I, 2016, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V134, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.07.009
   Payne MR, 2016, ICES J MAR SCI, V73, P1272, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsv231
   Piani C, 2010, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V99, P187, DOI 10.1007/s00704-009-0134-9
   Pinsky ML, 2018, SCIENCE, V360, P1189, DOI 10.1126/science.aat2360
   Plagányi ÉE, 2014, FISH FISH, V15, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2012.00488.x
   Plagányi EE, 2011, MAR FRESHWATER RES, V62, P1132, DOI 10.1071/MF10279
   Poloczanska ES, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P919, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1958, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1958]
   Punt AE, 2016, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V134, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.04.018
   Punt AE, 2016, FISH FISH, V17, P303, DOI 10.1111/faf.12104
   Reimer MN, 2018, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V88, P427, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.01.009
   Reum J., FRONT MAR SCI
   Reum JCP, 2019, OIKOS, V128, P1051, DOI 10.1111/oik.05630
   Rose KA, 2015, PROG OCEANOGR, V138, P348, DOI 10.1016/j.pocean.2015.01.012
   Rosenberg AA, 2018, CONSERV LETT, V11, DOI 10.1111/conl.12363
   Saha S, 2010, B AM METEOROL SOC, V91, P1015, DOI 10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1
   Scott F, 2014, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V5, P1121, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12256
   Seung C. K., 2018, REGIONAL EC ANAL N P, P86
   Seung C, 2016, NAT RESOUR MODEL, V29, P289, DOI 10.1111/nrm.12092
   Seung CK, 2015, CLIM CHANG ECON, V6, DOI 10.1142/S2010007815500177
   Sigler M.F., 2016, ALASKA REGIONAL ACTI
   Sigler MF, 2016, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V134, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.01.003
   Small DP, 2015, PHYSIOL BIOCHEM ZOOL, V88, P494, DOI 10.1086/682238
   Smith DM, 2019, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V12, P1139, DOI 10.5194/gmd-12-1139-2019
   Spencer PD, 2016, ICES J MAR SCI, V73, P1330, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsw040
   Spencers PD, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P3954, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14763
   Stabeno PJ, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0185464
   Stabeno PJ, 2016, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V134, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.05.010
   Stabeno PJ, 2012, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V65-70, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2012.02.020
   Stevenson DE, 2019, POLAR BIOL, V42, P407, DOI 10.1007/s00300-018-2431-1
   Stewart IJ, 2018, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V75, P2109, DOI 10.1139/cjfas-2018-0238
   Stock CA, 2011, PROG OCEANOGR, V88, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.pocean.2010.09.001
   Stouffer RJ, 2017, B AM METEOROL SOC, V98, P95, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00013.1
   Stram DL, 2009, ICES J MAR SCI, V66, P1633, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsp138
   Szuwalski CS, 2016, ICES J MAR SCI, V73, P1297, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsv229
   Szuwalski CS, 2015, FISH FISH, V16, P633, DOI 10.1111/faf.12083
   Thorson JT, 2019, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V64, P2632, DOI 10.1002/lno.11238
   Thorson JT, 2019, FISH FISH, V20, P1083, DOI 10.1111/faf.12398
   Thorson JT, 2017, FISH FISH, V18, P1073, DOI 10.1111/faf.12225
   Tittensor DP, 2018, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V11, P1421, DOI 10.5194/gmd-11-1421-2018
   van Vuuren DP, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P373, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0906-1
   van Vuuren DP, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P95, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0152-3
   Vancoppenolle M, 2013, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V27, P605, DOI 10.1002/gbc.20055
   Wang MY, 2012, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V65-70, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2012.02.022
   Watanabe S, 2011, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V4, P845, DOI 10.5194/gmd-4-845-2011
   Wiese FK, 2012, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V65-70, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2012.03.001
   Wilderbuer T, 2013, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V94, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.03.021
   Wise RM, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002
   Zador SG, 2017, ICES J MAR SCI, V74, P421, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsw144
NR 113
TC 68
Z9 70
U1 0
U2 43
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-7745
J9 FRONT MAR SCI
JI Front. Mar. Sci.
PD JAN 14
PY 2020
VL 6
AR 775
DI 10.3389/fmars.2019.00775
PG 18
WC Environmental Sciences; Marine & Freshwater Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Marine & Freshwater Biology
GA KD6LA
UT WOS:000507975000001
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Constantin, J
   Raynal, H
   Casellas, E
   Hoffman, H
   Bindi, M
   Doro, L
   Eckersten, H
   Gaiser, T
   Grosz, B
   Haas, E
   Kersebaum, KC
   Klatt, S
   Kuhnert, M
   Lewan, E
   Maharjan, GR
   Moriondo, M
   Nendel, C
   Roggero, PP
   Specka, X
   Trombi, G
   Villa, A
   Wang, EL
   Weihermüller, L
   Yeluripati, J
   Zhao, ZG
   Ewert, F
   Bergez, JE
AF Constantin, Julie
   Raynal, Helene
   Casellas, Eric
   Hoffman, Holger
   Bindi, Marco
   Doro, Luca
   Eckersten, Henrik
   Gaiser, Thomas
   Grosz, Balasz
   Haas, Edwin
   Kersebaum, Kurt-Christian
   Klatt, Steffen
   Kuhnert, Matthias
   Lewan, Elisabet
   Maharjan, Ganga Ram
   Moriondo, Marco
   Nendel, Claas
   Roggero, Pier Paolo
   Specka, Xenia
   Trombi, Giacomo
   Villa, Ana
   Wang, Enli
   Weihermueller, Lutz
   Yeluripati, Jagadeesh
   Zhao, Zhigan
   Ewert, Frank
   Bergez, Jacques-Eric
TI Management and spatial resolution effects on yield and water balance at
   regional scale in crop models
SO AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Drainage; Evapotranspiration; Aggregation; Decision rules; Scaling
ID WINTER-WHEAT YIELD; DATA AGGREGATION; SOWING DATES; AREA INDEX; INPUT
   DATA; CARBON; GROWTH; IRRIGATION; PRODUCTIVITY; ASSIMILATION
AB Due to the more frequent use of crop models at regional and national scale, the effects of spatial data input resolution have gained increased attention. However, little is known about the influence of variability in crop management on model outputs. A constant and uniform crop management is often considered over the simulated area and period. This study determines the influence of crop management adapted to climatic conditions and input data resolution on regional-scale outputs of crop models. For this purpose, winter wheat and maize were simulated over 30 years with spatially and temporally uniform management or adaptive management for North Rhine-Westphalia ((similar to)34 083 km(2)), Germany. Adaptive management to local climatic conditions was used for 1) sowing date, 2) N fertilization dates, 3) N amounts, and 4) crop cycle length. Therefore, the models were applied with four different management sets for each crop. Input data for climate, soil and management were selected at five resolutions, from 1 x 1 km to 100 x 100 km grid size. Overall, 11 crop models were used to predict regional mean crop yield, actual evapotranspiration, and drainage. Adaptive management had little effect (< 10% difference) on the 30-year mean of the three output variables for most models and did not depend on soil, climate, and management resolution. Nevertheless, the effect was substantial for certain models, up to 31% on yield, 27% on evapotranspiration, and 12% on drainage compared to the uniform management reference. In general, effects were stronger on yield than on evapotranspiration and drainage, which had little sensitivity to changes in management. Scaling effects were generally lower than management effects on yield and evapotranspiration as opposed to drainage. Despite this trend, sensitivity to management and scaling varied greatly among the models. At the annual scale, effects were stronger in certain years, particularly the management effect on yield. These results imply that depending on the model, the representation of management should be carefully chosen, particularly when simulating yields and for predictions on annual scale.
C1 [Constantin, Julie; Bergez, Jacques-Eric] Univ Toulouse, AGIR, INRA, Castanet Tolosan, France.
   [Raynal, Helene; Casellas, Eric] Univ Toulouse, INRA, MIAT, UR 875, F-31320 Castanet Tolosan, France.
   [Hoffman, Holger; Gaiser, Thomas; Maharjan, Ganga Ram; Ewert, Frank] Univ Bonn, INRES, Crop Sci Grp, Bonn, Germany.
   [Bindi, Marco; Trombi, Giacomo] Univ Florence, Dept Agr Food Environm & Forestry DAGRI, Florence, Italy.
   [Doro, Luca; Roggero, Pier Paolo] Univ Sassari, Desertificat Res Ctr, Sassari, Italy.
   [Doro, Luca; Roggero, Pier Paolo] Univ Sassari, Dept Agr Sci, Sassari, Italy.
   [Doro, Luca] Texas A&M AgriLife Res, Blackland Res & Extens Ctr, Temple, TX USA.
   [Eckersten, Henrik] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Crop Prod Ecol, Uppsala, Sweden.
   [Grosz, Balasz] Thunen Inst Climate Smart Agr, Braunschweig, Germany.
   [Haas, Edwin; Klatt, Steffen] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Meteorol & Climate Res Atmospher Environm Re, Garmisch Partenkirchen, Germany.
   [Kersebaum, Kurt-Christian; Nendel, Claas; Specka, Xenia; Ewert, Frank] ZALF, Leibnz Ctr Agr Landscape Res, Muncheberg, Germany.
   [Kuhnert, Matthias; Yeluripati, Jagadeesh] James Hutton Inst, Informat & Computat Sci Grp, Aberdeen, Scotland.
   [Lewan, Elisabet; Villa, Ana] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Soil & Environm, Uppsala, Sweden.
   [Moriondo, Marco] CNR Ibimet, Florence, Italy.
   [Wang, Enli; Zhao, Zhigan] CSIRO Land & Water, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
   [Weihermueller, Lutz] Agrosphere IBG 3, Inst Bio & Geosci, Julich, Germany.
C3 INRAE; Universite de Toulouse; Universite de Toulouse; INRAE; University
   of Bonn; University of Florence; University of Sassari; University of
   Sassari; Texas A&M University System; Texas A&M University College
   Station; Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Swedish University of Agricultural
   Sciences; Johann Heinrich von Thunen Institute; Helmholtz Association;
   Karlsruhe Institute of Technology; Leibniz Association; Leibniz Zentrum
   fur Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF); James Hutton Institute; Swedish
   University of Agricultural Sciences; Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
   (CNR); Istituto di Biometeorologia (IBIMET-CNR); Commonwealth Scientific
   & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO); CSIRO Land & Water
RP Constantin, J (corresponding author), Univ Toulouse, AGIR, INRA, Castanet Tolosan, France.
RI Haas, Edwin/A-7890-2013; Doro, Luca/AAA-5596-2021; raynal,
   helene/IQU-9470-2023; Grosz, Balazs/AFT-1500-2022; Wang,
   Enli/K-7478-2012; Gaiser, Thomas/AAD-6326-2021; Roggero, Pier
   Paolo/D-2580-2012; Constantin, Julie/JNR-8648-2023; Moriondo,
   Marco/H-5279-2019; Ewert, Frank/AER-0007-2022; Specka,
   Xenia/U-8770-2019; Yeluripati, Jagadeesh/AAF-3283-2020; bindi,
   marco/M-6415-2014; Kersebaum, Kurt Christian/A-7558-2010; Nendel,
   Claas/C-8844-2013; Zhao, Zhigan/E-8963-2015
OI Specka, Xenia/0000-0002-1890-0192; Villa, Ana/0000-0002-8611-6447;
   bindi, marco/0000-0002-8968-954X; Raynal, Helene/0000-0002-3492-0564;
   Weihermuller, Lutz/0000-0003-1991-7735; Gaiser,
   Thomas/0000-0002-5820-2364; Kersebaum, Kurt
   Christian/0000-0002-3679-8427; Grosz, Balazs/0000-0003-4138-4840; Ewert,
   Frank/0000-0002-4392-8154; Constantin, Julie/0000-0001-9647-5374;
   Nendel, Claas/0000-0001-7608-9097; Zhao, Zhigan/0000-0003-1533-7215;
   Kuhnert, Matthias/0000-0003-3284-2133; Trombi,
   Giacomo/0000-0002-3775-272X
FU FACCE MACSUR knowledge hub; INRA ACCAF meta programme; FACCE MACSUR
   through the Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry [3200009600];
   Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and
   Spatial Planning [FORMAS 942-2015-1970]; German Federal Ministry of Food
   and Agriculture (BMEL) through the Federal Office for Agriculture and
   Food (BLE) [2851ERA01 J]; FACCE MACSUR [2812ERA147]; German Federal
   Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [031B0511B]; UK BBSRC
   [BB/N004922/1]; Ministry of Agricultural, food and forestry policies of
   Italy [D.M.60/7303/2012, D.M. 24064/7303/2015]; BBSRC [BB/N004922/1,
   BB/K009265/1] Funding Source: UKRI
FX This work was supported by the FACCE MACSUR knowledge hub
   (http://macsur.eu).JC, HR, EC and JEB thank the INRA ACCAF meta
   programme for funding. FT and RPR were supported by FACCE MACSUR
   (3200009600) through the Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
   (MMM). HE, EL and AV were supported by The Swedish Research Council for
   Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (FORMAS
   942-2015-1970) and thank professor P-E Jansson (Royal Institute of
   Technology, Stockholm) for support. FE, TG and HH acknowledge support by
   the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) through the
   Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE), (2851ERA01 J). KCK and CN
   acknowledge FACCE MACSUR (2812ERA147). XS was funded by the German
   Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the framework of
   the funding measure "Soil as a Sustainable Resource for the Bioeconomy
   BonaRes", project "BonaRes (Module B): BonaRes Centre for Soil Research,
   subproject B" (grant 031B0511B). MK and JY thank for the funding by the
   UK BBSRC (BB/N004922/1) and the MAXWELL HPC team of the University of
   Aberdeen for providing equipment and support through the German Federal
   Ministry of Food and Agriculture for the DailyDayCent simulations. MB,
   LD, MM, PPR and MT aknowledge the funding provided by the Ministry of
   Agricultural, food and forestry policies of Italy D.M.60/7303/2012; D.M.
   24064/7303/2015. The funders had no role in study design, data
   collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the
   manuscript.
CR Asseng S, 2000, EUR J AGRON, V12, P37, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(99)00044-1
   Battude M, 2017, AGR WATER MANAGE, V189, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.04.018
   Bergez JE, 2014, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V62, P370, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.07.010
   Bonelli LE, 2016, FIELD CROP RES, V198, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.09.003
   Brisson N, 2003, EUR J AGRON, V18, P309, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00110-7
   Conrad Y, 2009, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V34, P530, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2008.08.003
   Coucheney E, 2018, GEODERMA, V318, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.11.025
   de Wit A, 2012, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V164, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.04.011
   Del Grosso SJ, 2006, J ENVIRON QUAL, V35, P1451, DOI 10.2134/jeq2005.0160
   Ewert F, 2011, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V142, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.016
   Faivre R, 2004, AGRONOMIE, V24, P205, DOI 10.1051/agro:2004016
   Folberth C., 2016, Crop Manag. Soil Handl. Crop yield Estim, DOI [10.5194/bg- 2016-527, DOI 10.5194/BG-2016-527]
   Gaiser T, 2008, ECOL MODEL, V218, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.06.025
   Gaiser T, 2013, ECOL MODEL, V256, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.02.016
   Gaiser T, 2010, AGR SYST, V103, P656, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.08.004
   Gaiser T, 2009, ECOL MODEL, V220, P3372, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.08.001
   Griffiths P, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V220, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2018.10.031
   Grosz B, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V96, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.046
   Herbst M, 2008, ECOL MODEL, V214, P271, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.02.007
   Hoffmann H, 2015, CLIM RES, V65, P53, DOI 10.3354/cr01326
   Hoffmann H, 2016, CLIMATE SOIL INPUT D, DOI [10.7910/DVN/C0J5BB, DOI 10.7910/DVN/C0J5BB]
   Hoffmann H, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0151782
   Huang JX, 2015, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V204, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.02.001
   Hutchings NJ, 2012, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V9, P4487, DOI 10.5194/bg-9-4487-2012
   Jansson PE, 2012, T ASABE, V55, P1335
   Kersebatum KC, 2007, MODELLING WATER AND NUTRIENT DYNAMICS IN SOIL-CROP SYSTEMS, P147, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-4479-3_11
   Kersebaum KC, 2014, EUR J AGRON, V52, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2013.04.005
   Klosterhalfen A, 2017, ECOL MODEL, V363, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.07.028
   Kollas C, 2015, EUR J AGRON, V70, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2015.06.007
   Kuhnert M, 2017, EUR J AGRON, V88, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2016.06.005
   Leenhardt D, 2002, AGR WATER MANAGE, V55, P37, DOI 10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00183-4
   Maton L, 2005, AGR SYST, V86, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2004.09.010
   Mo XG, 2005, ECOL MODEL, V183, P301, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.07.032
   Nendel C, 2009, EUR J AGRON, V30, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2008.08.003
   Nendel C, 2013, FIELD CROP RES, V145, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.02.014
   Nendel C, 2011, ECOL MODEL, V222, P1614, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.018
   Noory H, 2011, AGR WATER MANAGE, V98, P1062, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.01.013
   Portmann FT, 2010, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V24, DOI 10.1029/2008GB003435
   Priesack E, 2006, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V75, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10705-006-9006-1
   Robert M, 2018, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V100, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.11.013
   Sacks WJ, 2010, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V19, P607, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00551.x
   Savin I, 2007, JRC SCI TECH REP
   Senthilkumar K, 2015, AGR WATER MANAGE, V152, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.01.004
   Singh V., 1995, EPIC MODEL COMPUTER
   Specka X, 2015, EUR J AGRON, V71, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2015.08.004
   Tao FL, 2013, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V170, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.10.003
   Tao F, 2009, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V149, P831, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.11.004
   Therond O, 2014, 7 INT C ENV MOD SOFT, V8
   Tornquist CG, 2009, GEODERMA, V150, P404, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.03.001
   van Ittersum MK, 2013, FIELD CROP RES, V143, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.009
   Varella H., 2012, Agricultural Sciences, V3, P949, DOI 10.4236/as.2012.37116
   WILLIAMS JR, 1983, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V38, P381
   Yeluripati JB, 2009, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V41, P2579, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.08.021
   Zhao G, 2015, CLIM RES, V65, P141, DOI 10.3354/cr01301
   Zhao G, 2015, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V200, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.09.026
NR 55
TC 25
Z9 26
U1 2
U2 51
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0168-1923
EI 1873-2240
J9 AGR FOREST METEOROL
JI Agric. For. Meteorol.
PD SEP 15
PY 2019
VL 275
BP 184
EP 195
DI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.05.013
PG 12
WC Agronomy; Forestry; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Forestry; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA IP9NH
UT WOS:000480376400016
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Mekonnen, EN
   Fetene, A
   Gebremariam, E
AF Mekonnen, Esubalew Nebebe
   Fetene, Aramde
   Gebremariam, Ephrem
TI Grid-based climate variability analysis of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
SO HELIYON
LA English
DT Article
DE Addis Ababa; Climate change; Modified Mann-kendall test; Grid data;
   Temperature trends
ID PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; URBAN HEAT-ISLAND; SPATIAL INTERPOLATION;
   TEMPERATURE VARIABILITY; AIR-TEMPERATURE; TREND ANALYSIS; MANN-KENDALL;
   RAINFALL; VARIABLES; IMPACT
AB Climate change is an intricate global environmental concern. However, its impact is more pervasive in developing nations such as Ethiopia. Hence, this manuscript examines temperature variability and the magnitude of change over 38 years in the specific case of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Gridded meteorological data consisting of minimum and maximum temperatures on a monthly time scale ranging from 1981 to 2018 was obtained from the National Meteorological Agency of Ethiopia. The coefficient of variation (CV) and standardized anomaly index (SAI) were used to examine the rate and extent of temperature anomalies. Geostatistical models, particularly ordinary kriging, are presented as a means of spatially interpolating temperature data. Modified Mann-Kendall test (MMK), Sen's Slope (SS) estimator, principal component analysis (PCA), and Ttest were employed to determine the monthly, annual, and seasonal trends using Geospatial technologies, "R" programming, and statistical software. The findings revealed substantial spatial and temporal variation in Addis Ababa's annual and seasonal maximum and minimum temperatures. The long-term mean annual maximum and minimum temperatures were 25.8 degrees C and 12.6 degrees C, respectively. The monthly, annual, and seasonal temperatures accrued significantly except in the months of January and September. It is noteworthy that the decadal maximum temperature has risen by 2.7 degrees C, while minimum temperatures have displayed comparatively minor fluctuations. Moreover, the findings also exhibited that the average maximum and minimum temperatures increased by 1.88 degrees C and 1.72 degrees C, correspondingly and the highest temperature occurred during the spring (Belg) season. The first two PCAs (Annual and Kiremt Tmax) account for 90% of the temperature variation. In conclusion, the findings underscore the pressing need for the implementation of climate adaptation strategies and policy measures, which can strengthen the city's resilience to imminent climate change-induced hazards. The mounting temperature presents substantial challenges across various sectors within the city, emphasizing the urgency of preemptive actions to mitigate potential repercussions.
C1 [Mekonnen, Esubalew Nebebe; Gebremariam, Ephrem] Addis Ababa Univ, Comp Aided Design & Geoinformat, EiABC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
   [Fetene, Aramde] Addis Ababa Univ, Environm Planning & Landscape Design, EiABC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
C3 Addis Ababa University; Addis Ababa University
RP Mekonnen, EN (corresponding author), Addis Ababa Univ, Comp Aided Design & Geoinformat, EiABC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
EM esubalew.nebebe@aau.edu.et; aramde.fetene@eiabc.edu.et;
   ephrem.gebremariam@eiabc.edu.et
OI Mekonnen, Esubalew Nebebe/0000-0003-1133-4914
CR AACPPO, 2017, Addis Ababa City Structure Plan, P1
   AAEP&GD, 2021, Addis Ababa City Climate Action Plan, V149
   Abadi B., 2020, Environ. Syst. Res, V9, P1, DOI [10.1186/s40068-020-00165-6, DOI 10.1186/S40068-020-00165-6]
   Abebe BA, 2022, METEOROL APPL, V29, DOI 10.1002/met.2059
   Addis Ababa City Planning Project Office, 2017, Addis Ababa City Structure Plan, P1
   Addisu S., 2015, Environ Syst Res, V4, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1186/S40068-015-0051-0, 10.1186/s40068-015-0051-0]
   Adger W. N., 1999, Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change, V4, P253, DOI [10.1023/A:1009601904210, DOI 10.1023/A:1009601904210]
   Agnew CT., 2000, BLACK SCHOLAR, V5, P37, DOI [10.1080/00064246.1974.11431441, DOI 10.1080/00064246.1974.11431441]
   Ahmed I., 2019, Clim. Chang. Agric., DOI 10.5772/intechopen.82697
   Ahn KH, 2014, J HYDROL, V515, P257, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.062
   Akponikpe P.B.I., 2015, 2 INT C CLIM SUSTAIN, V15
   Alemayehu Arragaw, 2020, Environmental Systems Research, V9, DOI 10.1186/s40068-020-00184-3
   Alemayehu A, 2017, GEOGR ANN A, V99, P85, DOI 10.1080/04353676.2017.1289460
   Alemu MM, 2020, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V11, P1505, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2019.084
   Alemu ZA., 2020, Environ. Syst. Res., V9, P27, DOI 10.1186/s40068-020-00190-5
   [Anonymous], 2022, The sustainable development goals report 2022, P64
   [Anonymous], 2011, Global Report on Human Settlements 2011: Citites and Climate Change
   [Anonymous], 2022, IPCCW2, DOI [10.4324/9781315071961-11, DOI 10.4324/9781315071961-11]
   [Anonymous], 2014, Earth Perspect, DOI DOI 10.1186/2194-6434-1-15
   [Anonymous], 2014, Change, P276, DOI 10.1787/9789264091375-en
   [Anonymous], 2014, The IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report What's in it for Africa?
   Apaydin H, 2004, CLIMATE RES, V28, P31, DOI 10.3354/cr028031
   Appelhans T, 2015, SPAT STAT-NETH, V14, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.spasta.2015.05.008
   Arsiso BK, 2018, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V105, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2018.02.009
   Arsiso BK, 2018, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V105, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2018.03.008
   Asefa M, 2020, PLANT DIVERSITY, V42, P302, DOI 10.1016/j.pld.2020.04.004
   Asfaw A, 2018, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V19, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2017.12.002
   Ashraf M, 1997, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V84, P255, DOI 10.1016/S0168-1923(96)02358-1
   Averchenkova A., 2019, Governance of climate change policy: A case study of South Africa, P1, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.23403.49443
   Bahita T.A., 2021, Arab. J. Geosci., V14, P1, DOI [10.1007/s12517-021-08874-7, DOI 10.1007/S12517-021-08874-7]
   Bayable G., 2021, Environ Syst Res, V10, P1, DOI [10.1186/s40068-020-00216-y, DOI 10.1186/S40068-020-00216-Y]
   Belay A, 2021, CLIMATE, V9, DOI 10.3390/cli9060096
   Belay AS, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11222688
   Benti F., 2019, Caraka Tani: Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, V34, P67, DOI [10.20961/carakatani.v34i1.28022, DOI 10.20961/CARAKATANI.V34I1.28022]
   Biernacik P, 2023, SENSORS-BASEL, V23, DOI 10.3390/s23083941
   Bogale GA, 2021, SUSTAIN ENVIRON, V7, DOI 10.1080/23311843.2021.1875555
   Borga M, 1997, J HYDROL, V195, P160, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03250-7
   Bouza-Deaño R, 2008, J HYDROL, V361, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.048
   Butler CD, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15102266
   Chen H, 2007, J HYDROL, V344, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.06.034
   Cherie G.G., 2015, Climate Change Impact Assessment of Dire Dam Water Supply, P1
   Cochrane L., 2013, Int. J. Sociol. Anthropol, V5, P192, DOI [10.5897/ijsa2013.0459, DOI 10.5897/IJSA2013.0459]
   Collins JM, 2011, J CLIMATE, V24, P3649, DOI 10.1175/2011JCLI3753.1
   Conway D, 2004, INT J CLIMATOL, V24, P77, DOI 10.1002/joc.989
   Conway D, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.013
   Cortekar J, 2016, CLIM SERV, V4, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2016.11.002
   Dendir Z, 2022, ADV METEOROL, V2022, DOI 10.1155/2022/4745123
   Dereje Ayalew Dereje Ayalew, 2012, African Journal of Agricultural Research, V7, P1475
   Dhingra I.C., 2021, EUR PHYS J C, V3, P81, DOI [10.4324/9781003206729-4, DOI 10.4324/9781003206729-4]
   Dinku T, 2007, INT J REMOTE SENS, V28, P1503, DOI 10.1080/01431160600954688
   Diro GT, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V117, DOI 10.1029/2011JD016997
   Donat MG, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V118, P2098, DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50150
   Duhan D, 2013, CR GEOSCI, V345, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.crte.2012.10.016
   Elzopy KA, 2021, S AFR GEOGR J, V103, P381, DOI 10.1080/03736245.2020.1835699
   Eshetu M., 2021, J ENV EARTH SCI, V11, P1, DOI [10.7176/jees/11-9-04, DOI 10.7176/JEES/11-9-04]
   Feke B.E., 2021, Variability and trends of observed minimum , maximum and average temperature over Northwestern parts of Ethiopia Since 1987, V27
   Feyisa GL, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V123, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.008
   Feyissa G., 2018, GIS Based Quantification and Mapping of Climate Change Vulnerability Hotspots in Addis Ababa
   Feyissa G, 2018, CLIMATE, V6, DOI 10.3390/cli6030058
   Forster P, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P129
   Frich P, 2002, CLIMATE RES, V19, P193, DOI 10.3354/cr019193
   Frimpong BF, 2022, ENVIRON SYST RES, V11, DOI 10.1186/s40068-022-00269-1
   GABRIEL KR, 1971, BIOMETRIKA, V58, P453, DOI 10.1093/biomet/58.3.453
   Gataric Dragica., 2019, Zbornik radova-Geografski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, P33, DOI DOI 10.5937/ZRGFUB1901033G
   Gebrechorkos SH, 2019, INT J CLIMATOL, V39, P18, DOI 10.1002/joc.5777
   Gebremicael TG, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P2127, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-2127-2017
   Gelata FT, 2023, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V14, P977, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2023.508
   Getachew B., 2018, J. Degrade. Min. Land Manage, V5, P1111, DOI [10.15243/jdmlm.2018.052.1111, DOI 10.15243/JDMLM.2018.052.1111]
   Goovaerts P, 2000, J HYDROL, V228, P113, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00144-X
   Guo Qingchun, 2023, Chemosphere, V340, P139886, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139886
   Guo QC, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P22319, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-23813-z
   Guptha GC, 2021, REMOTE SENS APPL, V23, DOI 10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100601
   Haining RP, 2010, GEOGR ANAL, V42, P7, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2009.00780.x
   Hamed KH, 1998, J HYDROL, V204, P182, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00125-X
   Hare W., 2003, Assessment of Knowledge on Impacts of Climate Change-Contribution to the Specification of Art. 2 of the UNFCCC, P1
   Hassaan M., 2017, J GEOSCIENCE ENV PRO, V5, P102, DOI DOI 10.4236/GEP.2017.511008
   Henderson J.V., 2014, Is Climate Change Driving Urbanization in Africa?
   Hoegh-Guldberg O, 2019, SCIENCE, V365, P1263, DOI 10.1126/science.aaw6974
   Hofierka J., 2002, Multivariate Interpolation of Precipitation Using Regularized Spline with Tension, V6
   Holdaway M.R., 1996, SPATIAL MODELING INT, V6, P215
   Holdaway MR, 1996, CLIMATE RES, V6, P215, DOI 10.3354/cr006215
   Hou YX, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14194840
   Huisman O., 2009, J. Multivariate Anal., V127, P98, DOI [10.1016/j.jmva.2014.02.006, DOI 10.1016/J.JMVA.2014.02.006]
   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2023, Climate Change 2021The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844.001, DOI 10.1017/9781009157940, 10.1017/9781009157896]
   IPCC, 2021, Climate Change 2021 The Physical Science Basis WGI, V34
   IPCC, 2021, Rep. Intergov. Panel Clim. Chang., V34, DOI [10.3724/sp.j.7103161536.F0003-F0003, DOI 10.3724/SP.J.7103161536.F0003-F0003]
   IPCC, 2007, AR4 CLIM CHANG 2007, DOI 10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00250-9
   ipcc, 2023, AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023
   IPCC, 2022, Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844]
   IPCC, 2012, MAN RISKS EXTR EV, DOI 10.1017/cbo9781139177245
   IPCC, 2022, Summary for policymakers: climate change 2022 impacts, P37, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844.Front, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844.FRONT]
   IPCC, 2007, Weather, V59, DOI [10.1256/wea.58.04, DOI 10.1256/WEA.58.04]
   Jacob D, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P563, DOI 10.1007/s10113-013-0499-2
   Jain SK, 2012, CURR SCI INDIA, V102, P37
   Jolliffe IT, 2016, PHILOS T R SOC A, V374, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
   Joseph J.E., 2020, The usefulness of gridded climate data products in characterizing climate variability and assessing crop production
   Kilmer P D., Journalism, DOI DOI 10.1177/1461444810365020
   Kiros G, 2016, ARAB J GEOSCI, V9, DOI 10.1007/s12517-016-2471-1
   Koroso NH, 2023, LAND USE POLICY, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106827
   Krinner G., 2013, Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781107415324.024, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.024]
   Kundzewicz ZW, 2006, IAHS-AISH P, V308, P538
   Kuo PF, 2021, SENSORS-BASEL, V21, DOI 10.3390/s21051853
   Legese W., 2018, Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change, V9, DOI [10.4172/2157-7617.1000491, DOI 10.4172/2157-7617.1000491]
   Li CJ, 2009, J GEOCHEM EXPLOR, V101, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.gexplo.2008.06.003
   Li Jin, 2008, A Review of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Environmental Scientists'
   Ling ZH, 2020, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V631, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/631/1/012019
   Ludi E., 2011, Ethiopia Synthesis Report
   Ly S, 2011, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V15, P2259, DOI 10.5194/hess-15-2259-2011
   Mann HB, 1945, ECONOMETRICA, V13, P245, DOI 10.2307/1907187
   Mayewski PA, 1997, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V102, P26345, DOI 10.1029/96JC03365
   McSweeney C, 2010, B AM METEOROL SOC, V91, P157, DOI 10.1175/2009BAMS2826.1
   Mcsweeney C., 2008, UNDP climate change country profiles: Ethiopian, P1
   Mekonen AA, 2020, GEOENVIRONMENTAL DIS, V7, DOI 10.1186/s40677-020-0146-4
   Michaud J.D., 1995, Spatial and Elevational Variations of Summer Rainfall in the Southwestern United Stated
   Mohammed Y., 2019, Int. J. Hydrol, V2, P594, DOI [10.15406/ijh.2018.02.00131, DOI 10.15406/IJH.2018.02.00131]
   Moral FJ, 2010, INT J CLIMATOL, V30, P620, DOI 10.1002/joc.1913
   Mosammam AM, 2013, J APPL STAT, V40, P923, DOI 10.1080/02664763.2012.750474
   Mulugeta S, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11071498
   Muthoni FK, 2019, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V137, P1869, DOI 10.1007/s00704-018-2712-1
   Mwangi K., 2015, Geosptatial Inf. Syst. Remote Sensing, V4, P12
   Nandi S, 2024, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V171, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105869
   National Meteorological Agency [NMA], 2007, The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Climate Change National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) of Ethiopia Climate Change National Adaptation Programme of Action (Napa) of Ethiopia, P85
   Ngongondo C, 2011, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V106, P79, DOI 10.1007/s00704-011-0413-0
   Niang I, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1199
   Oliver M. A., 1990, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, V4, P313, DOI 10.1080/02693799008941549
   Orke YA, 2021, CLIMATE, V9, DOI 10.3390/cli9060098
   Oxfam, 2017, Oxfam Media Briefing-A Climate in Crisis
   Ozturk D, 2016, AN ACAD BRAS CIENC, V88, P2121, DOI 10.1590/0001-3765201620150103
   PANDZIC K, 1990, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V41, P177, DOI 10.1007/BF00866450
   Patz JA, 2005, NATURE, V438, P310, DOI 10.1038/nature04188
   Pauleit Stephan., 2015, Urban Vulnerability And Climate Change in Africa: A Multidisciplinary Approach, V4
   PHILLIPS DL, 1992, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V58, P119, DOI 10.1016/0168-1923(92)90114-J
   Pingale S. M., 2016, Journal of Water and Land Development, P3
   Piri I., 2016, Determination of the Best Geostatistical Method for Climatic Zoning in Iran Determination of the Best Geostatistical Method for Climatic Zoning in Iran, DOI [10.15666/aeer/1501, DOI 10.15666/AEER/1501]
   Ray S, 2021, EARTH SYST ENVIRON, V5, P531, DOI 10.1007/s41748-021-00205-w
   Reusch DB, 2005, POLAR GEOGR, V29, P188, DOI 10.1080/789610199
   Richman M.B., 1981, Obliquely Rotatted Principal Components: an Improved Meteorological Map Typing Technique?
   RICHMAN MB, 1985, J CLIM APPL METEOROL, V24, P1325, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1985)024<1325:CPAOTA>2.0.CO;2
   Rowell DP, 2015, J CLIMATE, V28, P9768, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0140.1
   Ryu JS, 2002, KSME INT J, V16, P619, DOI 10.1007/BF03184811
   Sahoo S, 2021, GROUNDWATER SUST DEV, V14, DOI 10.1016/j.gsd.2021.100644
   SEN PK, 1968, J AM STAT ASSOC, V63, P1379
   Shiferraw M, 2022, WORLD LITERATURE TOD, V96, P5, DOI 10.1353/wlt.2022.0101
   Sibiya N, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14127111
   Signorino CS, 1999, INT STUD QUART, V43, P115, DOI 10.1111/0020-8833.00113
   Sluiter R., 2009, Intern, P2009
   Sluiter R., 2014, Interpolation Methods for Climate Data Literature Review
   Sonali P, 2013, J HYDROL, V476, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.034
   Srinivasan B.V., 2015, 20 C PROBABLILITY ST, P228
   Stern N., 2007, The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511817434
   Sunny Agarwal A. S. Suchithra, 2021, Indian Journal of Ecology, V48, P453
   Suryavanshi S, 2014, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V117, P403, DOI 10.1007/s00704-013-1013-y
   Swain S, 2022, GEOCARTO INT, V37, P17971, DOI 10.1080/10106049.2022.2136260
   Swain S, 2022, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V194, DOI 10.1007/s10661-022-10532-8
   Swain S, 2022, APPL WATER SCI, V12, DOI 10.1007/s13201-022-01604-8
   Swain S, 2022, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V147, P817, DOI 10.1007/s00704-021-03861-0
   Swain S, 2021, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V80, DOI 10.1007/s12665-021-09523-8
   Tadic L, 2019, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V138, P1049, DOI 10.1007/s00704-019-02887-9
   Tan JG, 2010, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V54, P75, DOI 10.1007/s00484-009-0256-x
   Teferi E, 2017, CLIM CHANG MANAG, P539, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-49520-0_33
   Tessema YA., 2013, Agricultural and Food Economics, V1, P1, DOI [10.1186/2193-7532-1-13, DOI 10.1186/2193-7532-1-13]
   Tofu DA, 2023, SCI AFR, V19, DOI 10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01448
   UN-Habitat, 2008, Addis Ababa Urban Profile
   UN-Habitat, 2022, Envisaging the Future of Cities
   Wagesho N, 2013, HYDROLOG SCI J, V58, P354, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2012.754543
   WALSH JE, 1978, MON WEATHER REV, V106, P1532, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1978)106<1532:TASSOT>2.0.CO;2
   Wang F, 2020, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V8, DOI 10.3389/feart.2020.00014
   Wanyama D., 2017, A Spatial Analysis of Climate Change Effects on Maize Productivity in Kenya
   Ware MB, 2023, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V153, P213, DOI 10.1007/s00704-023-04463-8
   Weldegerima T.M., 2018, Ethiopia, V2018
   WMO, 2023, Guidelines on the Definition and Characterization of Extreme Weather and Climate Events, V1310
   Woldegerima T, 2017, URBAN ECOSYST, V20, P245, DOI 10.1007/s11252-016-0590-9
   Worku Hailu., 2017, Environmental Quality Management, V27, P5, DOI DOI 10.1002/TQEM.21514
   World Bank, 2009, Africa region making development climate resilient: a World Bank strategy for Sub-Saharan Africa. 46947
   World Bank, 2011, and gaps in climate change adaptation in coastal cities, DOI [10.1596/27396, DOI 10.1596/27396]
   Wubneh M, 2013, CITIES, V35, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.08.002
   Xiao Y, 2016, SPRINGERPLUS, V5, DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-2073-0
   Yang DZ, 2017, SOL ENERGY, V153, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2017.05.072
   Yang J.S., 2004, Estimation of Land Surface Temperature Using Spatial Interpolation and Satellite-Derived Surface Emissivity, P89
   Yuan YM, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph192315470
   Yue S, 2002, J HYDROL, V259, P254, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00594-7
   Yue W., 2003, Geo Inf. Sci., V9, P71, DOI [10.1080/10824000309480590, DOI 10.1080/10824000309480590]
   Zegeye MK, 2022, ENVIRON SYST RES, V11, DOI 10.1186/s40068-022-00273-5
   Zglobicki W, 2018, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V77, DOI 10.1007/s12665-018-7969-2
   Zhang Q, 2011, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V106, P417, DOI 10.1007/s00704-011-0447-3
   Zhao CY, 2005, ECOL MODEL, V189, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.016
   Zuska Z, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11236740
NR 187
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 2
PU CELL PRESS
PI CAMBRIDGE
PA 50 HAMPSHIRE ST, FLOOR 5, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139 USA
EI 2405-8440
J9 HELIYON
JI Heliyon
PD MAR 30
PY 2024
VL 10
IS 6
AR e27116
DI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27116
PG 30
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA OQ0O9
UT WOS:001208625400001
PM 38501024
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Shang, YP
   Sang, SH
   Tiwari, AK
   Khan, S
   Zhao, X
AF Shang, Yuping
   Sang, Shenghu
   Tiwari, Aviral Kumar
   Khan, Salahuddin
   Zhao, Xin
TI Impacts of renewable energy on climate risk: A global perspective for
   energy transition in a climate adaptation framework
SO APPLIED ENERGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Renewable energy; Climate risk; Energy transition; Pollution emissions;
   Biodiversity; Technological progress
ID ECONOMIC-GROWTH; OPPORTUNITIES; CONSUMPTION; EMISSIONS
AB In recent decades, the use of fossil fuels has had a harsh impact on the climate, and the frequency and intensity of various extreme weather events have increased, which has triggered an increased the use of renewable energy sources and reflection on technological advances. Many countries are trying to promote renewable energy to reduce their impact on climate change, but the impact of national energy policies in the climate risk framework remains poorly understood. Based on the panel data of 84 developed/developing countries around the world from 2006 to 2019, this paper studies and analyzes the impact of renewable energy use on climate risk. The study found that the increase in the proportion of renewable energy use can reduce the climate risk, and this result is still robust after undergoing robustness tests such as changing variables, samples, and research methods. The findings offer an important solution for European countries, where climate risks are most acute. The heterogeneity analysis shows that the higher the level of economic development, population density and the lower the level of incorruptibility, the weaker the inhibitory effect of renewable energy use on climate risk. The mechanism analysis also shows that the increase in the proportion of renewable energy use can reduce climate risk by reducing carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrogen monoxide (NO), PM2.5 emissions, and the proportion of fossil fuel use, but it does not reduce climate risk by increasing biodiversity. In particular, we find that technological progress has not played a role in the use of renewable energy to reduce climate risk, breaking the stereotype. The policy recommendation of this paper is that under the increasing pressure of climate change, the transition to clean energy is an indispensable option, and the need to accelerate the energy transition becomes more urgent. There is a greater need to further protect biodiversity and enhance technological progress.
C1 [Shang, Yuping; Sang, Shenghu] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China.
   [Tiwari, Aviral Kumar] Indian Inst Management Bodh Gaya, Bodh Gaya, Bihar, India.
   [Khan, Salahuddin] King Saud Univ, Coll Engn, POB 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.
   [Zhao, Xin] Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat & Appl Math, Bengbu 233030, Peoples R China.
C3 Hefei University of Technology; Indian Institute of Management (IIM
   System); Indian Institute of Management Bodh Gaya; King Saud University;
   Anhui University of Finance & Economics
RP Zhao, X (corresponding author), Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat & Appl Math, Bengbu 233030, Peoples R China.
EM zhaoshin_1993@163.com
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [72304084]; Ministry of
   Education of the People's Republic of China Humanities and Social
   Sciences Youth Foundation [22YJC910014]; Fundamental Research Funds for
   the Central Universities of China [JZ2023HGQA0083, JZ2023HGTA0210];
   Innovation Development Research Project of Anhui Province [2023CX507];
   Anhui Province Excellent Young Talents Fund Program of Higher Education
   Institutions [2023AH030015]; Social Sciences Planning Youth Project of
   Anhui Province [AHSKQ2022D138]; King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi
   Arabia [RSP2024R58]
FX This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (Grant No. 72304084) , the Ministry of Education of the People's
   Republic of China Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation (Grant
   No. 22YJC910014) , the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central
   Universities of China (Grant No. JZ2023HGQA0083; Grant No.
   JZ2023HGTA0210) , the Innovation Development Research Project of Anhui
   Province (Grant No. 2023CX507) , the Anhui Province Excellent Young
   Talents Fund Program of Higher Education Institutions (Grant No.
   2023AH030015) , and the Social Sciences Planning Youth Project of Anhui
   Province (Grant No. AHSKQ2022D138) . The authors also sincerely
   appreciate funding from researchers supporting project number
   (RSP2024R58) , King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
CR Acaroglu H, 2022, RENEW ENERG, V193, P434, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.138
   Adedoyin FF, 2021, ENERG POLICY, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112115
   [Anonymous], 2020, Outlook for biogas and biomethane: Prospects for organic growth, DOI DOI 10.1787/040C8CD2-EN
   Arndt C, 2023, ENERG POLICY, V174, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113471
   Battiston S, 2021, J FINANC STABIL, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100867
   Benebere P., 2023, Environmental Challenges, V10, DOI [10.1016/j.envc.2023.100678, DOI 10.1016/J.ENVC.2023.100678]
   Brini R, 2021, ENERGY, V223, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120064
   Carley S, 2020, NAT ENERGY, V5, P569, DOI 10.1038/s41560-020-0641-6
   Chaikumbung M, 2023, ENERG POLICY, V177, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113513
   Chapman L, 2015, INFRASTRUCT ASSET MA, V2, P58, DOI 10.1680/iasma.14.00032
   Chu LK, 2023, ENERGY, V263, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125799
   Costella C, 2023, CLIM RISK MANAG, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2023.100501
   Dagestani A, 2023, ENERG ECON, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106966
   Dincer I, 2000, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V4, P157, DOI 10.1016/S1364-0321(99)00011-8
   Dutta A, 2023, ENERGY, V265, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126376
   Escobedo FJ, 2009, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V90, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.021
   Estrada F, 2021, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1504, P95, DOI 10.1111/nyas.14652
   Fuhrer J, 2006, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V79, P79, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9106-6
   Gielen D, 2019, ENERGY STRATEG REV, V24, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006
   Ginglinger E, 2023, MANAGE SCI, V69, P7492, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4952
   Gu QE, 2023, FINANC RES LETT, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104392
   Guo K, 2023, J COMMOD MARK, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.jcomm.2023.100367
   Halkos G., 2023, J. Risk Financ. Manag, V16, DOI [10.3390/jrfm16050264, DOI 10.3390/JRFM16050264]
   Hanif I, 2019, RENEW ENERG, V143, P586, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.032
   Chan HW, 2022, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101750
   Huang HH, 2018, J INT BUS STUD, V49, P633, DOI 10.1057/s41267-017-0125-5
   Huang XL, 2023, ENERGY, V268, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2023.126685
   Inglesi-Lotz R, 2016, ENERG ECON, V53, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.003
   Kim SK, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V859, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160175
   Krueger P, 2020, REV FINANC STUD, V33, P1067, DOI 10.1093/rfs/hhz137
   Lorente DB, 2023, ENVIRON SUSTAIN IND, V18, DOI 10.1016/j.indic.2023.100244
   Lu QC, 2023, FUEL, V344, DOI 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128041
   Mar KA, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V134, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.03.027
   Moriarty P, 2012, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V16, P244, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.151
   Panwar NL, 2011, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V15, P1513, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.037
   Paramati SR, 2017, ENERG ECON, V66, P360, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.06.025
   Perera ATD, 2023, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2022.113038
   Qamruzzaman M, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V159, P827, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.069
   Santosh M, 2024, GONDWANA RES, V130, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.gr.2024.01.013
   Sen S, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V69, P1170, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.137
   Sen S, 2016, J AFR EARTH SCI, V122, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.06.002
   Shahbaz M, 2020, ENERGY, V207, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118162
   Shan Y, 2023, RESOUR POLICY, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103270
   Sharif A, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102138
   Song ML, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V174, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121276
   Song YW, 2023, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V189, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122365
   Strauss BH, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22838-1
   Suman A, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V151, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111524
   Usman M, 2022, ENERG POLICY, V162, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112780
   Lucas JNV, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V62, P1032, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.069
   Wang TN, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102553
   Wang TN, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102324
   Wang X, 2023, ENERG POLICY, V180, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113660
   Xu Y, 2023, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2023.3239499
   Yao SJ, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V235, P1338, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.069
   Zhao X, 2023, RESOUR POLICY, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103919
   Zhao X, 2023, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V191, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122526
   Zhou DH, 2023, RENEW ENERG, V204, P722, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.018
NR 58
TC 16
Z9 16
U1 33
U2 42
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0306-2619
EI 1872-9118
J9 APPL ENERG
JI Appl. Energy
PD MAY 15
PY 2024
VL 362
AR 122994
DI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122994
EA MAR 2024
PG 13
WC Energy & Fuels; Engineering, Chemical
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Energy & Fuels; Engineering
GA QM7O7
UT WOS:001221357800001
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Fraser, JS
   Knapp, LSP
   Graham, B
   Jenkins, MA
   Kabrick, J
   Saunders, M
   Spetich, M
   Shifley, S
AF Fraser, Jacob S.
   Knapp, Lauren S. Pile
   Graham, Brad
   Jenkins, Michael A.
   Kabrick, John
   Saunders, Michael
   Spetich, Martin
   Shifley, Steve
TI Carbon dynamics in old-growth forests of the Central Hardwoods Region,
   USA
SO FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Carbon pools; Annual carbon productivity; Disturbance; Forest soil
   carbon; Forest floor carbon
ID UNITED-STATES; BIOMASS; STORAGE; MORTALITY; ECOSYSTEM; EXCHANGE;
   BIODIVERSITY; DIVERSITY; STANDS; WOOD
AB Managing old-growth forests and promoting old-growth complexity in aging forests for carbon emissions miti-gation has become an important component of diversified land management strategies. In the midwestern US, the Central Hardwoods Region (CHR) is the largest continuous deciduous forested area and includes a diverse range of species compositions, forest structures, and topoedaphic environments. Understanding carbon storage potential in old-growth forests across the CHR is important for evaluating climate-adaptive management stra-tegies to increase carbon sequestration in the region's aging forests. We assessed forest carbon in two time pe-riods (the early 1990s and the 2010s) in ten old-growth forests across a 770 km east-west productivity gradient from Indiana to Missouri. Further, we related anomalies in carbon pools between the two sampling periods to documented or observable disturbances. As expected, old-growth forests on more productive sites in the eastern portion of the study range stored more aboveground carbon (120-177 Mg C ha -1) than less productive sites to the west (93-117 Mg C ha -1). Over the twenty-year period, old-growth forests accumulated 9.2 +/- 1.5 (mean +/- SE) Mg C ha- 1 or a 7 % increase in total aboveground carbon. Further, downed dead wood carbon increased 5 % (0.4 +/- 0.7 Mg C ha -1), standing dead increased 7 % (0.3 +/- 0.7 Mg C ha -1), live roots increased 4 % (1.0 +/- 0.3), and dead roots increased by 68 % (0.3 +/- 0.1 Mg C ha -1). However, stochastic disturbances can positively or negatively impact total carbon and carbon pools. Documenting carbon trends and disturbance effects in old -growth forests provides guidance to enhance the representation of structurally complex, late successional for-ests using active forest management. Old-growth forests are currently rare in the CHR landscape, but the abundance of aging forests in the region provides immense potential to store carbon, particularly when combined with strategies that optimize early-and late-successional habitats for carbon sequestration along with other ecological goods and services.
C1 [Fraser, Jacob S.; Knapp, Lauren S. Pile; Kabrick, John; Shifley, Steve] US Forest Serv, Northern Res Stn, USDA, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
   [Graham, Brad] Missouri Dept Conservat, Terr Habitat Sci Unit, West Plains, MO 65775 USA.
   [Jenkins, Michael A.; Saunders, Michael] Purdue Univ, Dept Forestry & Nat Resources, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
   [Jenkins, Michael A.; Saunders, Michael] Purdue Univ, Hardwood Tree Improvement & Regenerat Ctr, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
   [Spetich, Martin] US Forest Serv, Southern Res Stn, USDA, Hot Springs, AR 71902 USA.
C3 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); United States Forest
   Service; University of Missouri System; University of Missouri Columbia;
   Purdue University System; Purdue University; Purdue University System;
   Purdue University; United States Department of Agriculture (USDA);
   United States Forest Service
RP Fraser, JS (corresponding author), US Forest Serv, Northern Res Stn, USDA, Columbia, MO 65211 USA.
EM Jacob.Fraser@usda.gov
RI Pile, Lauren/K-4393-2019; Saunders, Mike/A-7035-2010
OI Pile Knapp, Lauren/0000-0003-0096-913X; Saunders,
   Mike/0000-0001-5621-4321
CR Aldrich PR, 2005, FOREST SCI, V51, P406
   Anderson S., FOREST ECOL MANAG
   Barton AndrewM., 2018, Ecology and Recovery of Eastern Old-Growth Forests
   Bauhus J, 2009, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V258, P525, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.053
   Brandt L, 2014, NRS124 USDA FOR SERV
   Caspersen JP, 2001, ECOL RES, V16, P895, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00455.x
   Chojnacky DC, 2014, FORESTRY, V87, P129, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpt053
   Cleland D. T., 2007, WO76D
   Cowell CM, 2010, J VEG SCI, V21, P201, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01137.x
   Curtis PS, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V219, P1188, DOI 10.1111/nph.15227
   D'Amore D., 2016, Climate Change and Forest Soil Carbon
   Dale V. H., 2016, NATURAL DISTURBANCES, P355, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-21527-3_13, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-21527-3_13]
   Eisen K, 2015, J TORREY BOT SOC, V142, P97, DOI 10.3159/TORREY-D-14-00027.1
   Ford SE, 2017, ECOSPHERE, V8, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1721
   Gough CM, 2016, ECOSPHERE, V7, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1375
   Gundersen P, 2021, NATURE, V591, pE21, DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-03266-z
   Gunn J. S., 2018, Ecology and Recovery of Eastern OldGrowth Forests, P217, DOI [10.5822/978-1-61091-891-6_12, DOI 10.5822/978-1-61091-891-6_12]
   Gunn JS, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V312, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.10.023
   Harmon M.E., 1996, GUIDELINES MEASUREME
   Harmon M.E., 2008, Woody detritus density and density reduction factors for tree species in the United States: a synthesis
   Harmon ME, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V291, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.046
   HARMON ME, 1990, SCIENCE, V247, P699, DOI 10.1126/science.247.4943.699
   Harmon ME, 2001, J FOREST, V99, P24
   Hart J. L., 2017, FORESTS
   Hicke JA, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P7, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02543.x
   Hicks RayR., 1998, ECOLOGY MANAGEMENT C
   Hoover C.M., 2008, FIELD MEASUREMENTS F, V1st
   Hoover Coeli M, 2011, Carbon Balance Manag, V6, P17, DOI 10.1186/1750-0680-6-17
   Hoover CM, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V266, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.010
   Indiana Department of Natural Resources, HEMM WOODS NAT PRES
   IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2014, Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, DOI DOI 10.1017/CB09781107415416
   Jenkins J.C., 2004, COMPREHENSIVE DATABA
   Jenkins JC, 2003, FOREST SCI, V49, P12
   JENKINS MA, 1995, CAN J FOREST RES, V25, P1119, DOI 10.1139/x95-124
   Kabrick J. M., 2004, P 14 CENTR HARDW FOR, P27
   Kabrick JM, 2008, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V255, P1409, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.054
   Keeton William., 2018, Ecology and Recovery of Eastern Old Growth Forests, P237
   Keeton WS, 2011, FOREST SCI, V57, P489
   Keeton WilliamS., 2018, Ecology and Recovery of Eastern Old-Growth Forests, P267, DOI DOI 10.5822/978-1-61091-891-6_14
   Knohl A, 2009, ECOL STUD-ANAL SYNTH, V207, P141, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-92706-8_7
   Kowalski AS, 2004, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V10, P1707, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00846.x
   Lamlom SH, 2003, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V25, P381, DOI 10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00033-3
   Li QL, 2007, CAN J FOREST RES, V37, P2337, DOI 10.1139/X07-086
   Loreau M, 2001, SCIENCE, V294, P804, DOI 10.1126/science.1064088
   Lorimer CG, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V334, P344, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.09.003
   Lowney CA, 2016, J PLANT ECOL, V9, P256, DOI 10.1093/jpe/rtv050
   Luyssaert S, 2008, NATURE, V455, P213, DOI 10.1038/nature07276
   Martin AR, 2015, CAN J FOREST RES, V45, P744, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2015-0024
   Maser C., 1979, U S Department of Agriculture Agriculture Handbook, P78
   MCCUNE B, 1988, AM MIDL NAT, V120, P416, DOI 10.2307/2426014
   McGarvey JC, 2015, ECOLOGY, V96, P311, DOI 10.1890/14-1154.1
   McMullin RT, 2019, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V17, P176, DOI 10.1002/fee.2016
   Murphy P.A., 1997, OLD GROWTH DEFINITIO
   Nakagawa S, 2013, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V4, P133, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
   Nigh T., 1992, Draft Missouri Natural Area Nomination: Big Spring Pines, P12
   Oksanen J, 2022, R package version 2.6-2, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412971874.N145
   Oswalt S.N., 2014, Forest Resources of the United States, 2012: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service 2015 Update of the RPA Assessment
   PARKER G R, 1989, Natural Areas Journal, V9, P5
   Peterson C.J., 2016, Natural disturbances and historic range of variation, P89, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-21527-3_5
   Pinheiro J., 2022, R package version 3.1-159, V3, P1
   Potter KM, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V321, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.026
   Pregitzer KS, 2004, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V10, P2052, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00866.x
   Prtner H.O, 2022, Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, P3056, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844]
   Puhlick JJ, 2019, NAT AREA J, V39, P429, DOI 10.3375/043.039.0406
   Puhlick JJ, 2016, CAN J FOREST RES, V46, P1404, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0193
   Puhlick JJ, 2016, CAN J SOIL SCI, V96, P207, DOI 10.1139/cjss-2015-0136
   R Core Team, 2022, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
   Rebertus AJ, 1997, AM MIDL NAT, V137, P48, DOI 10.2307/2426754
   Runkle James R., 1996, P161
   Schmelz D. V., 1974, P INDIANA ACAD SCI, P234
   Schnur G. L., 1937, Yield, Stand, and Volume Tables for Even-Aged Upland Oak Forests
   Selva SB, 2003, FOREST CHRON, V79, P550, DOI 10.5558/tfc79550-3
   Shifley S. R., 1995, General Technical Report - Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, P23
   Shifley SR, 2014, FOREST SCI, V60, P914, DOI 10.5849/forsci.13-153
   Soil Survey Staff Natural Resources Conservation Service United States Department of Agriculture, Web Soil Survey
   Spetich M. A., 1995, CHARACTERISTICS SPAT
   Spetich MA, 1999, FOREST SCI, V45, P302
   Spetich MA, 2022, EARTH-BASEL, V3, P975, DOI 10.3390/earth3030057
   Stahle D.W., 1985, TREE RING CHRONOLOGI
   Thom D, 2018, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V15, P5699, DOI 10.5194/bg-15-5699-2018
   Thomas J.W., 1979, WILDLIFE HABITATS MA, V553, P60
   U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of the Secretary, 2022, 1077004 USDA OFF SEC
   Wilfahrt P. A., 2016, NATURAL DISTURBANCES
   Woods KD, 2022, ECOSPHERE, V13, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.3871
   Zhu K, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P3962, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1900797116
NR 85
TC 5
Z9 6
U1 3
U2 36
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0378-1127
EI 1872-7042
J9 FOREST ECOL MANAG
JI For. Ecol. Manage.
PD JUN 1
PY 2023
VL 537
AR 120958
DI 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120958
EA MAR 2023
PG 14
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA D6DU1
UT WOS:000969624600001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Homet, K
   Kremer, P
   Smith, V
   Strader, S
AF Homet, Kate
   Kremer, Peleg
   Smith, Virginia
   Strader, Stephen
TI Multi-variable assessment of green stormwater infrastructure planning
   across a city landscape: Incorporating social, environmental,
   built-environment, and maintenance vulnerabilities
SO FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE green stormwater infrastructure; GSI planning; GSI maintenance;
   Philadelphia; urban planning
ID URBAN VULNERABILITY; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK; EXPOSURE; SYSTEMS; HAZARDS;
   DAMAGE; MODEL; RISK
AB Green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) is an increasingly popular tool to meet federal water regulations for stormwater quality and quantity, while assuaging urban flooding. While cities across the United States implement GSI into their planning processes, they are also potentially affecting the local communities that are receiving these GSI through social, ecological, physical, and economic impacts. Flooding is impacting urban communities by damaging homes and infrastructure, degrading ecosystems, and exacerbating social inequities. In the planning process, there is an acute need for the consideration of the equitable distribution of GSI in addition to technical and engineering needs. This study examines multiple aspects of vulnerability to local flooding impacts-social, environmental, and infrastructural-across a city landscape to identify those communities that have a greater need for GSI. Given the city of Philadelphia is a leader in GSI implementation in the United States, we use it as our research setting where we create citywide, multifaceted vulnerability indices that account for the spatial distribution of social, built environment, and maintenance vulnerabilities to flooding events. In addition to these indices, a GSI type decision table was created to suggest more equitable placements of different GSI types based on their maintenance needs and expected co-benefits. The results of this study reveal unequal distribution of social and built-environment vulnerabilities in the city at the Census block group scale, with high social vulnerability consistently spread across the central, southwest, and northwest neighborhoods of Philadelphia. Potential areas of severe GSI maintenance impacts appear to be concentrated in the downtown neighborhoods, while overall vulnerability appears elevated throughout the downtown and northwest neighborhoods. These results indicate that some communities in Philadelphia are highly vulnerable and should be prioritized for GSI implementation. In addition, the type of GSI implemented should be optimized to address the specific vulnerability impacts in different areas. A multifaceted vulnerability approach to planning can be applied in multiple areas of climate adaptation equity, with future studies continuing to update and add more dimensions of vulnerability where and when applicable.
C1 [Homet, Kate; Kremer, Peleg; Strader, Stephen] Villanova Univ, Dept Geog & Environm, Villanova, PA 19085 USA.
   [Smith, Virginia] Villanova Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Villanova, PA USA.
C3 Villanova University; Villanova University
RP Kremer, P (corresponding author), Villanova Univ, Dept Geog & Environm, Villanova, PA 19085 USA.
EM peleg.kremer@villanova.edu
RI Kremer, Peleg/H-8373-2019
FU Department of Geography and the Environment at Villanova University;
   Villanova University's Falvey Memorial Library Scholarship Open Access
   Reserve (SOAR) Fund
FX The Department of Geography and the Environment at Villanova University
   supported this study by providing KH with Graduate Assistantship and a
   Graduate Summer Research Grant. In addition, this work received funding
   from Villanova University's Falvey Memorial Library Scholarship Open
   Access Reserve (SOAR) Fund.
CR American Community Survey, 2023, 5-year data (2009-2022)
   American Society of Landscape Architects, 2016, COP CLOUDB FORM STRA
   [Anonymous], 2011, NATL CTR ENV HLTH CD
   [Anonymous], 2011, Philadelphia 2011: State of the city
   [Anonymous], 2010, Prevention of Pneumococcal Disease Among Infants and Children --- Use of 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine and 23-Valent Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine (No. MMWR 59(RR11)), P1, DOI DOI 10.2175/193864711802639741
   Armal S, 2020, CLIMATE, V8, DOI 10.3390/cli8100116
   Ashley WS, 2016, B AM METEOROL SOC, V97, P767, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00150.1
   Backhaus A, 2013, J LANDSC ARCHIT, V8, P52, DOI 10.1080/18626033.2013.864130
   Bagwe M.D., 2017, Climate Change and Resulting Floods: Using Social Capital to Strengthen Community Resilience in Eastwick
   Baykal A., 2012, CITY COPENHAGEN CLOU, P1
   Bell CD, 2019, J SUSTAIN WATER BUIL, V5, DOI 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000871
   Blake E. S., 2018, Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Harvey
   Brody SD, 2008, DISASTERS, V32, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01024.x
   Bull-Kamanga L, 2003, ENVIRON URBAN, V15, P193, DOI 10.1177/095624780301500109
   Cao WT, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V817, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153012
   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016, USING PHARMACISTSPAT
   Charles River Watershed Association, 2008, STORMW PLANT ALT INF
   Chen Y, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062401
   Chini CM, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9010105
   Christman Z, 2018, LAND-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/land7040145
   City of New York, 2008, PLANYC SUST STORMW M
   Clark G.E., 1998, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, V3, P59, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1009609710795
   Custer R, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P461, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1725-7
   Cutter SL, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P242, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
   Cutter Susan L., 2002, American hazardscapes: The regionalization of hazards and disasters
   Delware Valley Regional Planning Commission, 2019, EQ AN GREAT PHIL VER
   Dottori F, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P781, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0257-z
   Environmental Protection Agency, 2020, BAS INF BUILT ENV
   Ferguson AP, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V87, P989, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2806-6
   Flanagan R.M., 2010, Drexel L. Rev, V3, P139
   Golden HE, 2018, WIRES WATER, V5, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1254
   Heckert M, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V19, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.011
   Heinrichs D, 2013, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V37, P1865, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12031
   Herrera J, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V95, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.020
   Hirsch R.M., 1990, Surfa ce Water Hydrology: The Geology of America, VO-1
   Holt D.E., 2021, The Sediment Trap: Collecting Sediment from Urban Stormwater Runoff to Inform an Urban Sediment Budget
   Homet K, 2022, J SUSTAIN WATER BUIL, V8, DOI 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000986
   Hosseiny H., 2022, SOCIAL VULNERABILITY
   Hosseiny H., 2020, A generalized automated framework for urban runoff modeling and its application at a citywide landscape, P1
   Hunt WF., 2005, Impacts of global climate change, P1, DOI DOI 10.1061/40792%28173%29173
   Jarden KM, 2016, HYDROL PROCESS, V30, P1536, DOI 10.1002/hyp.10736
   Koks EE, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V47, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.013
   Kossin JP, 2018, NATURE, V558, P104, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0158-3
   Kovats S., 2010, Environment and health risks: a review of the influence and effects of social inequalities, P149
   Krellenberg K, 2017, PROG HUM GEOG, V41, P408, DOI 10.1177/0309132516645959
   Lavell A, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, P25
   Liu J, 2014, WATER-SUI, V6, P1069, DOI 10.3390/w6041069
   Mailhot A, 2010, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V136, P201, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000023
   Mandarano L, 2017, LOCAL ENVIRON, V22, P1338, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2017.1345878
   Matsler M, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104145
   Maxwell JT, 2021, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V118, DOI [10.1073/pnas.2105636118|1of8, 10.1073/pnas.2105636118]
   McGarity A, 2015, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2015: Floods, Droughts, and Ecosystems, P409
   McMichael AJ, 2000, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V78, P1117
   McPhillips LE, 2021, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V6, P133, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2020.1754625
   McPhillips LE, 2018, FRONT BUILT ENVIRON, V4, DOI 10.3389/fbuil.2018.00026
   Meenar M, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9120534
   Meerow S, 2020, CITIES, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102621
   Nofal OM, 2022, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V7, P171, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2020.1722546
   Open Data Philly, 2017, DEP REC PROP PARC DA
   Open Data Philly, 2021, SCHOOLS
   Open Data Philly, 2021, FIR DEP FAC
   Open Data Philly, 2021, PHIL HOSP
   Philadelphia Water Department, 2016, 5 20 GO CEL 5 YEARS
   Philadelphia Water Department, 2016, GREEN STORMW INF PUB
   Priemus H., 2009, Built Environment, V35, P425, DOI DOI 10.2148/BENV.35.4.425
   Romero-Lankao P, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P670, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.04.002
   Rosenzweig B, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V99, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.020
   Salerno F, 2018, WATER RES, V144, P491, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.058
   Seattle Public Utilities, 2009, GREEN STORMW OP MAIN
   Shade C, 2020, ECOL SOC, V25, DOI 10.5751/ES-12076-250437
   Siemens, 2012, GREEN CIT IND
   Smiley KT, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aba0fe
   Smith C, 2021, J IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V147, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001617
   Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 2021, GID DAT PORT
   Taguchi VJ, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12020522
   Tate E, 2013, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V103, P526, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2012.700616
   Thorsby JS, 2020, URBAN WATER J, V17, P838, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2020.1823429
   Trenberth KE, 1999, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V42, P327, DOI 10.1023/A:1005488920935
   Trenberth KE, 2011, CLIM RES, V47, P123, DOI 10.3354/cr00953
   U.S. Census Bureau, 2021, QUICKFACTS PHIL CIT
   United Nations Population Fund, 2014, POP SUST DEV POST 20
   van der Wiel K, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P897, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-897-2017
   Wadzuk B, 2021, J SUSTAIN WATER BUIL, V7, DOI 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000958
   Wadzuk B, 2021, J SUSTAIN WATER BUIL, V7, DOI 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000945
   Walsh KJE, 2016, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V7, P65, DOI 10.1002/wcc.371
   Zahran S, 2008, DISASTERS, V32, P537, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01054.x
NR 86
TC 3
Z9 4
U1 4
U2 25
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-665X
J9 FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ
JI Front. Environ. Sci.
PD SEP 1
PY 2022
VL 10
AR 958704
DI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.958704
PG 20
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 4P3DF
UT WOS:000855276800001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Li, LC
   Wang, B
   Feng, PY
   Liu, DL
   He, QS
   Zhang, YJ
   Wang, YK
   Li, SY
   Lu, XL
   Yue, C
   Li, Y
   He, JQ
   Feng, H
   Yang, GJ
   Yu, Q
AF Li, Linchao
   Wang, Bin
   Feng, Puyu
   Liu, De Li
   He, Qinsi
   Zhang, Yajie
   Wang, Yakai
   Li, Siyi
   Lu, Xiaoliang
   Yue, Chao
   Li, Yi
   He, Jianqiang
   Feng, Hao
   Yang, Guijun
   Yu, Qiang
TI Developing machine learning models with multi-source environmental data
   to predict wheat yield in China
SO COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE
LA English
DT Article
DE Yield prediction; Vegetation indices; NIRv; Random forest; Support
   vector machine; Wheat
ID CROP YIELD; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WINTER-WHEAT; FOOD-DEMAND; TEMPERATURE;
   IMPACTS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; CLASSIFICATION; FLUORESCENCE; TERRESTRIAL
AB Crop yield is controlled by different environmental factors. Multi-source data for site-specific soils, climates, and remotely sensed vegetation indices are essential for yield prediction. Algorithms of data-model fusion for crop growth monitoring and yield prediction are complicated and need to be optimized to deal with model uncertainty. This study integrated multi-source environmental variables (e.g., satellite-based vegetation indices, climate data, and soil properties) into random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) models for wheat yield prediction in China. The performance of both RF and SVM models was investigated using different types of vegetation indices associated with other predictors. Relative importance and partial dependence analyses were used to identify the main predictors and their relationships with wheat yield. We found that using remotely sensed vegetation indices improved our model precision, and that near-infrared reflectance of terrestrial vegetation (NIRv) was slightly better than normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and enhanced vegetation index (EVI) in predicting yield. NIRv was better in detecting climate stress on crops, and could capture more information regarding crop growth and yield formation. Compared with the SVM model, the RF model with NIRv and other covariates had better performance in wheat yield prediction, with R-2 and RMSE being 0.74 and 758 kg/ha respectively. We also found that NIRv from jointing to heading was the most important predictor in determining yield, followed by solar radiation (especially during tillering-heading), relative humidity (during planting-tillering), soil organic carbon, and wind speed (throughout the growing season). In addition, wheat yield exhibited threshold-like responses to most factors based on our RF model. These threshold values can help to better understand how different environmental factors limit wheat yield, which will provide useful information for climate-adaptive crop management. Our findings demonstrated the potential of using NIRv for yield prediction. This approach is broadly applicable to other regions globally using publicly available data.
C1 [Li, Linchao; Wang, Yakai] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Nat Resources & Environm, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Linchao; Wang, Bin; Zhang, Yajie; Lu, Xiaoliang; Yue, Chao; Feng, Hao; Yu, Qiang] Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, State Key Lab Soil Eros & Dryland Farming Loess P, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Linchao; Yang, Guijun] Beijing Acad Agr & Forestry Sci, Informat Technol Res Ctr, Key Lab Quantitat Remote Sensing Agr, Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Bin; Liu, De Li; Li, Siyi] Wagga Wagga Agr Inst, NSW Dept Primary Ind, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.
   [Feng, Puyu] China Agr Univ, Coll Land Sci & Technol, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, De Li] Univ New South Wales, Climate Change Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
   [He, Qinsi; Li, Siyi] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Sci, Sch Life Sci, POB 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia.
   [Li, Yi; He, Jianqiang; Feng, Hao] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Water Resources & Architectural Engn, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
   [Yang, Guijun] Changan Univ, Sch Geol Engn & Surveying & Mapping, Xian 710054, Peoples R China.
   [Yu, Qiang] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Proc, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
C3 Northwest A&F University - China; Northwest A&F University - China;
   Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Soil & Water Conservation
   (ISWC), CAS; Ministry of Agriculture & Rural Affairs; Beijing Academy of
   Agriculture & Forestry Sciences (BAAFS); Department of Primary
   Industries & Regional Development NSW; China Agricultural University;
   University of New South Wales Sydney; University of Technology Sydney;
   Northwest A&F University - China; Chang'an University; Chinese Academy
   of Sciences; Institute of Geographic Sciences & Natural Resources
   Research, CAS
RP Yang, GJ (corresponding author), Beijing Acad Agr & Forestry Sci, Informat Technol Res Ctr, Key Lab Quantitat Remote Sensing Agr, Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China.; Wang, B (corresponding author), Wagga Wagga Agr Inst, NSW Dept Primary Ind, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.
EM bin.a.wang@dpi.nsw.gov.au; yanggj@nercita.org.cn
RI Wang, Bin/AFI-6568-2022; , De Li Liu/Y-4656-2019; Yu, Qiang/D-3702-2009
OI Yang, Guijun/0000-0002-6425-8321; He, Qinsi/0000-0001-9585-3716; Yang,
   Qian/0009-0003-0914-3198; Liu, De Li/0000-0003-2574-1908; Li,
   Siyi/0009-0007-9570-5474; Yu, Qiang/0000-0001-6950-1821; Wang,
   Bin/0000-0002-6422-5802
FU Natural Science Foundation of China [41961124006, 41730645, 52079114];
   Natural Sci-ence Foundation of Qinghai [2021-HZ-811]; National Key
   Research and Development Program of China [2019YFE0125300,
   2017YFE0122500]
FX Acknowledgments This study was supported by the Natural Science
   Foundation of China (No. 41961124006, 41730645 and 52079114) , the
   Natural Sci-ence Foundation of Qinghai (2021-HZ-811) , and the National
   Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFE0125300 and
   2017YFE0122500) . We thank two anonymous reviewers and the editor for
   their helpful comments to improve the manuscript.
CR Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
   [Anonymous], 2001, Machine Learning
   Badgley G, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P3731, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14729
   Badgley G, 2017, SCI ADV, V3, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1602244
   Bajzelj B, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P924, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2353, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2353]
   Bergjord AK, 2008, EUR J AGRON, V28, P321, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2007.10.002
   Besalatpour A, 2012, INT AGROPHYS, V26, P109, DOI 10.2478/v10247-012-0017-7
   Besalatpour AA, 2014, ARID LAND RES MANAG, V28, P383, DOI 10.1080/15324982.2013.871599
   Brown JN, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V260, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.06.001
   Burgess AJ, 2019, J EXP BOT, V70, P2371, DOI 10.1093/jxb/ery424
   Cai YP, 2019, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V274, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.03.010
   Camps-Valls G, 2021, SCI ADV, V7, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abc7447
   Cao J, 2021, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V297, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108275
   Cao J, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12050750
   Challinor AJ, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P287, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2153, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2153]
   Challinor AJ, 2010, ENVIRON RES LETT, V5, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/5/3/034012
   Chen AN, 2021, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V27, P1144, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15373
   Chen XG, 2020, AGR SYST, V185, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102955
   Chlingaryan A, 2018, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V151, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2018.05.012
   CORTES C, 1995, MACH LEARN, V20, P273, DOI 10.1007/BF00994018
   Dechant B., 2020, NIRVP ROBUST STRUCTU
   FAO, 2018, WORLD FOOD AGR STAT
   Feng PY, 2020, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V285, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107922
   Feng PY, 2019, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V275, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.05.018
   Feng PY, 2019, AGR SYST, V173, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.015
   Gopal PSM, 2019, APPL ARTIF INTELL, V33, P621, DOI 10.1080/08839514.2019.1592343
   Hammad HM, 2020, COMMUN SOIL SCI PLAN, V51, P1406, DOI 10.1080/00103624.2020.1763385
   Han JC, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12020236
   Hand D. W., 1988, Acta Horticulturae, P143
   Harvell CD, 2002, SCIENCE, V296, P2158, DOI 10.1126/science.1063699
   He LY, 2020, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V47, DOI 10.1029/2020GL087474
   Hernández-Barrera S, 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P45, DOI 10.1002/joc.4975
   Hoffman AL, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab7b22
   Huang JX, 2015, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V204, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.02.001
   Huang MT, 2019, NAT ECOL EVOL, V3, P772, DOI 10.1038/s41559-019-0838-x
   Jeong JH, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0156571
   Jiang H, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P1754, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14885
   Köhler P, 2018, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V45, P10456, DOI 10.1029/2018GL079031
   Lal R, 2006, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V17, P197, DOI 10.1002/ldr.696
   Lau CCS, 2007, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V48, P2006, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2007.01.004
   Leng GY, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab7b24
   Leroux L, 2019, EUR J AGRON, V108, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2019.04.007
   Lesk C, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P819, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0830-0
   Li AN, 2007, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V73, P1149, DOI 10.14358/PERS.73.10.1149
   Li LC, 2021, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V308, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108558
   Li LC, 2019, J HYDROL, V579, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124170
   Li LC, 2019, ATMOS RES, V217, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.10.019
   Li Y, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P2325, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14628
   Li Y, 2019, FIELD CROP RES, V234, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.02.005
   Li YX, 2014, FOOD ENERGY SECUR, V3, P19, DOI 10.1002/fes3.41
   Liakos KG, 2018, SENSORS-BASEL, V18, DOI 10.3390/s18082674
   Liu LY, 2017, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V232, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.06.014
   Lobell DB, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V81, P187, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9141-3
   Majumder B, 2008, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V72, P775, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2006.0378
   Naimi S, 2022, GEOCARTO INT, V37, P8230, DOI 10.1080/10106049.2021.1996639
   Norouzi M, 2010, ACTA AGR SCAND B-S P, V60, P341, DOI 10.1080/09064710903005682
   Peng B, 2020, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102126
   Peng B, 2020, NAT PLANTS, V6, P338, DOI 10.1038/s41477-020-0625-3
   Piao SL, 2010, NATURE, V467, P43, DOI 10.1038/nature09364
   Rehfeldt GE, 2012, ECOL APPL, V22, P119, DOI 10.1890/11-0495.1
   Roberts MJ, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7f33
   RODEN JS, 1993, OECOLOGIA, V93, P201, DOI 10.1007/BF00317672
   Ryu Y, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V223, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.01.016
   Schauberger B, 2017, NAT COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1038/ncomms13931
   Shangguan W, 2012, GEODERMA, V171, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.01.013
   Shao GC, 2013, PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V51, P429, DOI 10.1007/s11099-013-0039-9
   Shiferaw B, 2013, FOOD SECUR, V5, P291, DOI 10.1007/s12571-013-0263-y
   Singh B, 2017, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V3, P996, DOI 10.1007/s40808-017-0347-3
   Song L, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P4023, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14302
   SUN DW, 1994, T ASAE, V37, P1919, DOI 10.13031/2013.28284
   Tao FL, 2014, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V189, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.01.013
   Tilman D, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P20260, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1116437108
   Vicente-Serrano SM, 2010, J CLIMATE, V23, P1696, DOI 10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1
   Vittinghoff E, 2005, STAT BIOL HEALTH, pVII
   Wang XB, 2020, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V294, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108135
   Wu A, 2019, NAT PLANTS, V5, P380, DOI 10.1038/s41477-019-0398-8
   [吴克宁 Wu Kening], 2019, [土壤学报, Acta Pedologica Sinica], V56, P227
   Xiao LJ, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V260, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.06.006
   Yao N, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V704, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135245
   Zeraatpisheh M, 2021, GEODERMA REG, V27, DOI 10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00440
   Zeraatpisheh M, 2019, GEODERMA, V338, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.09.006
   Zhang Y, 2018, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V15, P5779, DOI 10.5194/bg-15-5779-2018
   Zhang YG, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P3727, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12664
   Zhao S., 1983, ACTA GEOGR SIN, V38, P1, DOI [10.11821/xb198301001, DOI 10.11821/XB198301001]
   Zhao XZ, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11040375
   Zheng BY, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P2899, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02724.x
NR 86
TC 47
Z9 49
U1 20
U2 154
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0168-1699
EI 1872-7107
J9 COMPUT ELECTRON AGR
JI Comput. Electron. Agric.
PD MAR
PY 2022
VL 194
AR 106790
DI 10.1016/j.compag.2022.106790
EA FEB 2022
PG 12
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary; Computer Science, Interdisciplinary
   Applications
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Computer Science
GA 0P4VM
UT WOS:000784219300002
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Ouyang, ZT
   Becker, R
   Shaver, W
   Chen, JQ
AF Ouyang, Zutao
   Becker, Richard
   Shaver, Wade
   Chen, Jiquan
TI Evaluating the sensitivity of wetlands to climate change with remote
   sensing techniques
SO HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
LA English
DT Article
DE remote sensing; Prarie Pothole; Landsat; TM; ETM; climate change;
   wetlands; water body; water surface
ID COTTONWOOD LAKE AREA; NORTH-DAKOTA; PRAIRIE WETLAND; DROUGHT;
   PERSPECTIVE; LANDSAT; INDEX
AB Wetlands are valuable ecosystems that provide many valuable services, yet many of these important ecosystems are at risk because of current trends in climate change. The Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) in the upper-midwest of the United States and south-central Canada, characterized by glacially sculpted landscapes and abundant wetlands, is one such vulnerable region. According to regional/global climate model predictions, drought occurrence will increase in the PPR region through the 21st century and thus will probably cause the amount of water in wetlands to decline. Water surface area (WSA) of Kidder County, ND, from 1984-2011 was measured by classifying TM/ETM+(Landsat Thematic Mapper / Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus) images through the modified normalized difference water index. We then developed a linear model based on the WSA of these wetlands and historical climate data and used this to determine the wetland sensitivity to climate change and predict future wetlands WSA in the PPR. Our model based on Palmer drought severity index (PDSI) of the current year (PDSIt-0) and of the previous two years (PDSIt-2) can explain 79% of the annual wetland WSA variance, suggesting a high sensitivity of wetlands to drought/climate change. We also predicted the PPR wetlands WSA in the 21st century under A1B scenario (a mid-carbon emission scenario) using simulated PDSI based on Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AR4 22-model ensemble climate. According to our prediction, the WSA of the PPR wetlands will decrease to less than half of the baseline WSA (defined as the mean wetlands WSA of the 2000s) by the mid of the 21st century, and to less than one-third by the 2080s, and will then slightly increase in the 2090s. This considerable future wetland loss caused only by climate change provides important implication to future wetland management and climate adaptation policy. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
C1 [Ouyang, Zutao; Becker, Richard; Shaver, Wade; Chen, Jiquan] Univ Toledo, Dept Environm Sci, Toledo, OH 43606 USA.
C3 University System of Ohio; University of Toledo
RP Becker, R (corresponding author), Univ Toledo, Dept Environm Sci, 2801 West Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA.
EM richard.becker@utoledo.edu
RI Chen, Jiquan/D-1955-2009; Yang, Zutao/LSL-2505-2024; Becker,
   Richard/A-9120-2010
OI Chen, Jiquan/0000-0003-0761-9458; Becker, Richard/0000-0003-2514-2040;
   Yang, Zutao/0000-0002-6919-569X
FU University of Toledo Office of Undergraduate Research through the
   Undergraduate Summer Research and Creative Activity Program (USRCAP);
   Direct For Biological Sciences; Div Of Biological Infrastructure
   [1034791] Funding Source: National Science Foundation; Office Of The
   Director; Office of Integrative Activities [0963345] Funding Source:
   National Science Foundation
FX This project was supported by the University of Toledo Office of
   Undergraduate Research through the Undergraduate Summer Research and
   Creative Activity Program (USRCAP). We thank Dr Aiguo Dai from the
   National Center for Atmospheric Research for providing simulated monthly
   PDSI data. We thank the thorough review and input from an anonymous
   reviewer that improved this paper. We also thank our colleagues working
   in the Environmental Remote Sensing Laboratory of the University of
   Toledo for help revising this paper.
CR AKAIKE H, 1981, CC/ENG TECH APPL SCI, P22
   [Anonymous], 20010006 US GEOL SUR
   Batt BDJ, 1989, US PRAIRIE POTHOLES
   Beeri O, 2007, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V13, P897, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01306.x
   Brander LM, 2006, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V33, P223, DOI 10.1007/s10640-005-3104-4
   Burke EJ, 2006, J HYDROMETEOROL, V7, P1113, DOI 10.1175/JHM544.1
   Council NR, 1982, IMP EM AGR TRENDS FI
   Dahl TE, 1990, WETL LOSS US 1780S 1
   Dai AG, 2011, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V2, P45, DOI 10.1002/wcc.81
   DRACUP JA, 1991, STOCH HYDROL HYDRAUL, V5, P261, DOI 10.1007/BF01543134
   Frazier PS, 2000, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V66, P1461
   Gleason RA, 2011, ECOL APPL, V21, pS65, DOI 10.1890/09-0216.1
   Guttman NB, 1996, B AM METEOROL SOC, V77, P293, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0293:AHPOUC>2.0.CO;2
   Hoke, 2005, P SPIE ALGORITHMS TE, DOI DOI 10.1117/12.603359
   Huang SL, 2011, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V115, P3377, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.002
   Johnson RR, 2008, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V63, p84A, DOI 10.2489/63.3.84A
   Johnson WC, 2010, BIOSCIENCE, V60, P128, DOI 10.1525/bio.2010.60.2.7
   Johnson WC, 2005, BIOSCIENCE, V55, P863, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0863:VONPWT]2.0.CO;2
   KANTRUD H A, 1989, U S Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report, V85, pI
   LARSON DL, 1995, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V30, P169, DOI 10.1007/BF01091840
   Mitsch WJ., 2015, Wetlands, V5
   Niemuth ND, 2010, WETLANDS, V30, P1053, DOI 10.1007/s13157-010-0111-1
   Ozesmi Stacy L., 2002, Wetlands Ecology and Management, V10, P381, DOI 10.1023/A:1020908432489
   Palmer WC, 1965, Research Paper No. 45), DOI DOI 10.2172/5171425
   Prtner H.O, 2022, Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, P3056, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844]
   Rosenberry DO, 2004, WETLANDS, V24, P483, DOI 10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0483:COEFDE]2.0.CO;2
   Sorenson LG, 1998, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V40, P343, DOI 10.1023/A:1005441608819
   van der Valk AG, 2005, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V539, P171, DOI 10.1007/s10750-004-4866-3
   Winter TC, 1998, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V40, P189, DOI 10.1023/A:1005448416571
   Withey P, 2011, ECOL ECON, V70, P798, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.11.019
   Xu HQ, 2006, INT J REMOTE SENS, V27, P3025, DOI 10.1080/01431160600589179
   Zhang B, 2009, WATER RESOUR RES, V45, DOI 10.1029/2008WR006878
   ,, 2007, Climate change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Group I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers
NR 33
TC 12
Z9 17
U1 0
U2 110
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0885-6087
EI 1099-1085
J9 HYDROL PROCESS
JI Hydrol. Process.
PD FEB 15
PY 2014
VL 28
IS 4
BP 1703
EP 1712
DI 10.1002/hyp.9685
PG 10
WC Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Water Resources
GA 304JN
UT WOS:000330743000011
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Fordham, DA
   Watts, MJ
   Delean, S
   Brook, BW
   Heard, LMB
   Bull, CM
AF Fordham, Damien A.
   Watts, Michael J.
   Delean, Steven
   Brook, Brook W.
   Heard, Lee M. B.
   Bull, C. M.
TI Managed relocation as an adaptation strategy for mitigating climate
   change threats to the persistence of an endangered lizard
SO GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE assisted migration; assisted colonization; bioclimate envelope; coupled
   niche-population model; mechanistic model; metapopulation; population
   viability analysis; reptile; species distribution model; translocation
ID PYGMY BLUETONGUE LIZARD; ASSISTED COLONIZATION; HABITAT REQUIREMENTS;
   SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; EXTINCTION RISK; POPULATION; CONSERVATION; MODELS;
   RANGE; AUSTRALIA
AB The distributional ranges of many species are contracting with habitat conversion and climate change. For vertebrates, informed strategies for translocations are an essential option for decisions about their conservation management. The pygmy bluetongue lizard, Tiliqua adelaidensis, is an endangered reptile with a highly restricted distribution, known from only a small number of natural grassland fragments in South Australia. Land-use changes over the last century have converted perennial native grasslands into croplands, pastures and urban areas, causing substantial contraction of the species' range due to loss of essential habitat. Indeed, the species was thought to be extinct until its rediscovery in 1992. We develop coupled-models that link habitat suitability with stochastic demographic processes to estimate extinction risk and to explore the efficacy of potential climate adaptation options. These coupled-models offer improvements over simple bioclimatic envelope models for estimating the impacts of climate change on persistence probability. Applying this coupled-model approach to T. adelaidensis, we show that: (i) climate-driven changes will adversely impact the expected minimum abundance of populations and could cause extinction without management intervention, (ii) adding artificial burrows might enhance local population density, however, without targeted translocations this measure has a limited effect on extinction risk, (iii) managed relocations are critical for safeguarding lizard population persistence, as a sole or joint action and (iv) where to source and where to relocate animals in a program of translocations depends on the velocity, extent and nonlinearities in rates of climate-induced habitat change. These results underscore the need to consider managed relocations as part of any multifaceted plan to compensate the effects of habitat loss or shifting environmental conditions on species with low dispersal capacity. More broadly, we provide the first step towards a more comprehensive framework for integrating extinction risk, managed relocations and climate change information into range-wide conservation management.
C1 [Fordham, Damien A.; Watts, Michael J.; Delean, Steven; Brook, Brook W.; Heard, Lee M. B.] Univ Adelaide, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
   [Heard, Lee M. B.] Sci Resource Ctr, Dept Environm & Nat Resources, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
   [Bull, C. M.] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Biol Sci, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
C3 University of Adelaide; Flinders University South Australia
RP Fordham, DA (corresponding author), Univ Adelaide, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, N Terrace Campus, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
EM damien.fordham@adelaide.edu.au
RI Fordham, Damien/E-9255-2013; Brook, Barry/G-2686-2011; Watts,
   Michael/A-9139-2010
OI Fordham, Damien/0000-0003-2137-5592; Brook, Barry/0000-0002-2491-1517;
   Bull, Michael/0000-0002-9350-5950; Watts, Michael/0000-0003-1559-3091
FU Australian Research Council (ARC) grants [DP1096427, LP0989420,
   FT100100200, LP0562240, LP0883495, DP110103852]; DENR; Australian
   Research Council [LP0562240, LP0883495, LP0989420] Funding Source:
   Australian Research Council
FX Mark Hutchinson, Aaron Fenner and Julie Schofield provided advice on
   functionally relevant predictors of T. adelaidensis range and abundance.
   Peter Lang and Tim Croft were involved in developing the
   vegetation-habitat scenario. Roman Urban and Andy Sharp assisted with T.
   adelaidensis records and regional knowledge. David Thompson provided GIS
   advice. Plant location data were accessed from the Yeti 3.2 vegetation
   plot data base, BDBSA and Victorian Flora Site Database. Australian
   Research Council (ARC) grants were used to support the contributions of
   DAF, MW, SD, LMBH and BWB (DP1096427, LP0989420 and FT100100200) and CMB
   (LP0562240, LP0883495, DP110103852). DENR provided research support.
CR Akçakaya HR, 2002, ANIM CONSERV, V5, P333, DOI 10.1017/S1367943002004092
   Anderson BJ, 2009, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V276, P1415, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2008.1681
   [Anonymous], DEM SURFACE TOOLS V
   [Anonymous], DIGITAL DATASET
   [Anonymous], WILDLIFE CO IN PRESS
   [Anonymous], 2005, RAMAS GIS LINKING LA
   [Anonymous], 2016, IUCN RED LIST THREAT
   Araújo MB, 2007, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V22, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010
   Brook BW, 2008, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V23, P453, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.011
   BULL CM, 1995, AUST J ECOL, V20, P393, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1995.tb00555.x
   Clarke L., 2007, SCENARIOS GREENHOUSE, P1
   Cogger HG, 1992, RETILES AMPHIBIANS A
   Conroy SDS, 2003, POPUL ECOL, V45, P105, DOI 10.1007/s10144-003-0145-9
   Early R, 2011, ECOL LETT, V14, P1125, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01681.x
   Elith J, 2011, DIVERS DISTRIB, V17, P43, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
   Elith J, 2009, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V40, P677, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159
   Fazey I, 2009, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V24, P475, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.003
   Fellows HL, 2009, J ZOOL, V279, P156, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00600.x
   Fenner AL, 2007, J ZOOL, V272, P444, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00287.x
   Fenner AL, 2008, WILDLIFE RES, V35, P158, DOI 10.1071/WR07103
   Fordham DA, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P1357, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02614.x
   Fordham DA, 2011, ECOL APPL, V21, P3317, DOI 10.1890/11-0314.1
   Fordham DA, 2012, ECOGRAPHY, V35, P4, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07398.x
   FRANKHAM R, 2010, INTRO CONSERVATION G
   Hodgson JA, 2009, J APPL ECOL, V46, P964, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01695.x
   Hoegh-Guldberg O, 2008, SCIENCE, V321, P345, DOI 10.1126/science.1157897
   Hoegh-Guldberg O, 2007, SCIENCE, V318, P1737, DOI 10.1126/science.1152509
   Honnay O, 2002, ECOL LETT, V5, P525, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00346.x
   Hughes L, 2003, AUSTRAL ECOL, V28, P423, DOI 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01300.x
   HULME M, 1995, ENERG POLICY, V23, P347, DOI 10.1016/0301-4215(95)90159-5
   Hunter ML, 2007, CONSERV BIOL, V21, P1356, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00780.x
   Hyde MK, 1995, The temperate grasslands of South Australia: their composition and conservation status
   IMAN RL, 1981, J QUAL TECHNOL, V13, P174, DOI 10.1080/00224065.1981.11978748
   Kearney M, 2009, ECOL LETT, V12, P334, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01277.x
   Keith DA, 2008, BIOL LETTERS, V4, P560, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0049
   Keith DA, 2011, P LINN SOC N S W, V132, P5
   Knapp AK, 2002, SCIENCE, V298, P2202, DOI 10.1126/science.1076347
   Liu CR, 2005, ECOGRAPHY, V28, P385, DOI 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03957.x
   Malcolm JR, 2002, J BIOGEOGR, V29, P835, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00702.x
   MCCARTHY MA, 1995, BIOL CONSERV, V73, P93, DOI 10.1016/0006-3207(95)00046-7
   McCarthy MA, 1996, ECOL MODEL, V85, P151, DOI 10.1016/0304-3800(94)00191-X
   McCarthy MA, 2001, ANIM CONSERV, V4, P351, DOI 10.1017/S136794300100141X
   McDonald-Madden E, 2011, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V1, P261, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1170
   Milne T, 1999, THESIS FLINDERS U AD
   Moseby KE, 2003, WILDLIFE RES, V30, P15, DOI 10.1071/WR02012
   Naujokaitis-Lewis IR, 2009, CONSERV BIOL, V23, P225, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01066.x
   Owens IPF, 2000, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V97, P12144, DOI 10.1073/pnas.200223397
   Parmesan C, 2006, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V37, P637, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
   Read JL, 2012, ACTA OECOL, V40, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.actao.2011.09.006
   Regan HM, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P936, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02586.x
   Ricciardi A, 2009, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V24, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2008.12.006
   Rosenzweig C, 2008, NATURE, V453, P353, DOI 10.1038/nature06937
   Sax DF, 2009, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V24, P472, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.004
   Schwartz MW, 2009, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V24, P474, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.006
   Smith AL, 2009, WILDLIFE RES, V36, P466, DOI 10.1071/WR08171
   Souter NJ, 2007, BIOL CONSERV, V135, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.09.014
   Souter NJ, 2006, T ROY SOC SOUTH AUST, V130, P186, DOI 10.1080/3721426.2006.10887056
   Souter NJ, 2004, BIOL CONSERV, V116, P403, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00232-5
   Tait CJ, 2005, ECOL APPL, V15, P346, DOI 10.1890/04-0920
   Thomas CD, 2011, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V26, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.02.006
   Traill LW, 2010, BIOL CONSERV, V143, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.001
   Wigley TML, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V97, P85, DOI 10.1007/s10584-009-9585-3
   Willis Stephen G., 2009, Conservation Letters, V2, P46, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00043.x
   Wintle BA, 2011, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V1, P355, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1227
NR 64
TC 49
Z9 53
U1 4
U2 205
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1354-1013
EI 1365-2486
J9 GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL
JI Glob. Change Biol.
PD SEP
PY 2012
VL 18
IS 9
BP 2743
EP 2755
DI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02742.x
PG 13
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 984WH
UT WOS:000307222700007
PM 24501053
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Eliassen, M
   Hartviksen, TA
   Holm, S
   Sorensen, BA
   Zingmark, M
AF Eliassen, Marianne
   Hartviksen, Trude Anita
   Holm, Solrun
   Sorensen, Bodil Anita
   Zingmark, Magnus
TI Aging in (a meaningful) place - appropriateness and feasibility of
   Outdoor Reablement in a rural Arctic setting
SO BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Age-friendly cities and communities; Aging in place; Outdoor
   environment; Co-design; Health care services; Rural Arctic community
ID CO-CREATION; HEALTH; COMMUNITY; SERVICES; EXPERIENCE; INNOVATION;
   FRAMEWORK; HOME
AB BackgroundAs populations age in the Western world, interventions aiming for 'aging in place', such as reablement, have gained prominence. Reablement programs have focused on enabling older people to maintain independence in their home environment. However, while a growing body of research points to the considerable benefits of engaging in outdoor environments, reablement rarely addresses outdoor activities. People living in rural Arctic areas often tend to have strong cultural, social, and emotional attachments to outdoor places, emphasizing the outdoors as a meaningful arena for engagement. Concurrently, rural Arctic communities face unique obstacles in facilitating outdoor activities, such as geographic isolation, limited access to services, harsh climate conditions, and seasonal variations. Recognizing these challenges, our study sought to tailor an outdoor reablement model that is appropriate and feasible for the context of a rural Arctic setting.MethodsThe study design was inspired by a co-design methodology, incorporating data creation through workshops, focus groups, and individual interviews conducted over an eleven-month period. Three municipalities in rural Arctic Norway were involved, with a total of 35 participants, including older people receiving reablement services and healthcare professionals. A socioecological theory supported the thematic data analysis.ResultsThe study yielded experiences that generated a comprehensive model for implementing outdoor reablement that meet the specific needs that the participants experienced in the rural Arctic setting. The model includes the individual level, accounting for physical and mental functioning; the organizational level, necessitating access to aids and equipment and cross-sectorial collaboration; and the environmental level, adapting to climatic, seasonal, and geographic challenges.ConclusionThis study contributes with knowledge that broadens the scope of reablement as an initiative to support aging in place to include outdoor environments. The tailored outdoor reablement model developed in this study addresses the complexity of aging in place in rural Arctic settings. The study underscores the importance of context-specific strategies that support older people in maintaining a healthy and meaningful life through active engagement with the outdoors.
C1 [Eliassen, Marianne] Art Univ Norway, Dept Hlth & Care Sci, UiT, N-9037 Tromso, Norway.
   [Hartviksen, Trude Anita] Arctic Univ Norway, Ctr Care Sci North, UiT, N-9037 Tromso, Norway.
   [Zingmark, Magnus] Umea Univ, Dept Community Med & Rehabil, Umea, Sweden.
   [Zingmark, Magnus] Hlth & Social Care Adm, Municipal Ostersund, Ostersund, Sweden.
C3 UiT The Arctic University of Tromso; UiT The Arctic University of
   Tromso; Umea University
RP Eliassen, M (corresponding author), Art Univ Norway, Dept Hlth & Care Sci, UiT, N-9037 Tromso, Norway.
EM marianne.eliassen@uit.no; trude.hartviksen@vestvagoy.kommune.no;
   Solrun.holm@vestvagoy.kommune.no;
   bodil.anita.sorensen@vestvagoy.kommune.no; magnus.zingmark@umu.se
RI Zingmark, Magnus/AAK-7839-2020
FU UiTThe Arctic University of Norway (incl University Hospital of North
   Norway); Regional Research Fund of Nordland (RFF) [IT:3217/13217201]
FX Open access funding provided by UiTThe Arctic University of Norway (incl
   University Hospital of North Norway) The study was funded by the
   Regional Research Fund of Nordland (RFF) (Project IT:3217/13217201).
CR [Anonymous], 2017, WMA Declaration of Helsinki-Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects
   Anttonen A, 2012, WELFARE STATE, UNIVERSALISM AND DIVERSITY, P16
   Arnadottir SA, 2022, INT J CIRCUMPOL HEAL, V81, DOI 10.1080/22423982.2022.2084818
   Aspinal F, 2016, AGE AGEING, V45, P574, DOI 10.1093/ageing/afw094
   Astell-Burt T, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V847, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157521
   Astell-Burt T, 2013, BMJ OPEN, V3, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003094
   Best A, 2003, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V18, P168, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-18.2.168
   Birkeland A, 2017, J MULTIDISCIP HEALTH, V10, P195, DOI 10.2147/JMDH.S133417
   Bjerkmo L, 2023, J AGING STUD, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101128
   Bjerkmo L, 2021, INT J CIRCUMPOL HEAL, V80, DOI 10.1080/22423982.2021.1957569
   Blaikie N., 2019, DESIGNING SOCIAL RES
   Blix BH., 2019, Qualitative Res Med Healthc, V3, P47, DOI [10.4081/qrmh.2019.7826, DOI 10.4081/QRMH.2019.7826]
   Bramble M, 2022, PRIM HEALTH CARE RES, V23, DOI 10.1017/S1463423621000918
   Braun V, 2019, QUAL RES SPORT EXERC, V11, P589, DOI 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
   Bronfenbrenner U., 1979, ECOLOGY HUMAN DEV EX, P330
   Buffel Tine., 2019, Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-69892-21094-1
   Crosby BC, 2017, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V19, P655, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165
   Currie M, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18147705
   DAMANPOUR F, 1991, ACAD MANAGE J, V34, P555, DOI 10.5465/256406
   Doh D, 2020, AGEING SOC, V40, P1371, DOI 10.1017/S0144686X18001770
   Donetto S, 2015, DES J, V18, P227, DOI 10.2752/175630615X14212498964312
   Driscoll D, 2010, INT J CIRCUMPOL HEAL, V69, P528, DOI 10.3402/ijch.v69i5.17683
   Edwards N, 2014, JAIDS-J ACQ IMM DEF, V67, pS157, DOI 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000322
   Eggebo H, 2020, J POPUL AGEING, V13, P465, DOI 10.1007/s12062-019-09253-7
   Elg M, 2020, J SERV MARK, V34, P87, DOI 10.1108/JSM-11-2018-0350
   Elg M, 2012, J SERV MANAGE, V23, P328, DOI 10.1108/09564231211248435
   Eliassen M., 2018, Physiother Theory Pract, V36, P18
   Eliassen M., 2018, J Interprof Care, V33, P12
   Eliassen M, 2024, BMC HEALTH SERV RES, V24, DOI 10.1186/s12913-024-10779-6
   Eliassen M, 2023, INT J CIRCUMPOL HEAL, V82, DOI 10.1080/22423982.2023.2273013
   Eliassen M, 2023, PHYSIOTHER THEOR PR, V39, P2106, DOI 10.1080/09593985.2022.2064380
   Emelyanova A, 2024, INT J CIRCUMPOL HEAL, V83, DOI 10.1080/22423982.2024.2339561
   Gitlin L.N., 2015, Behavioral intervention research: Designing, evaluating, and implementing, DOI DOI 10.1891/9780826126597
   Glass TA, 2006, SOC SCI MED, V62, P1650, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.044
   Greenhalgh T, 2016, MILBANK Q, V94, P392, DOI 10.1111/1468-0009.12197
   Herr K., 2005, ACTION RES DISSERTAT, DOI 10.4135/9781452226644.n3
   Hjelle KM, 2018, J MULTIDISCIP HEALTH, V11, P305, DOI 10.2147/JMDH.S160480
   Holt-Lunstad J, 2015, PERSPECT PSYCHOL SCI, V10, P227, DOI 10.1177/1745691614568352
   Howell BM, 2020, J CROSS-CULT GERONTO, V35, P113, DOI 10.1007/s10823-020-09399-4
   Jennings V, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16030452
   Kaltenborn BP, 2020, APPL GEOGR, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102229
   Kaltenborn BP, 2017, ECOL ECON, V140, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.003
   Kyle GT, 2004, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V24, P439, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.11.001
   Lewis C, 2020, J AGING STUD, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100870
   Lifvergren S, 2015, ACTION RES-LONDON, V13, P3, DOI 10.1177/1476750314568210
   Mansson L, 2020, BMC GERIATR, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12877-020-01592-x
   Marek KD, 2012, RES GERONTOL NURS, V5, P123, DOI 10.3928/19404921-20110802-01
   McCormack B, 2006, J ADV NURS, V56, P472, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04042.x
   Metzelthin SF, 2022, AGEING SOC, V42, P703, DOI 10.1017/S0144686X20000999
   Milligan C, 2010, PROG HUM GEOG, V34, P736, DOI 10.1177/0309132510364556
   Mjosund HL, 2022, BMC HEALTH SERV RES, V22, DOI 10.1186/s12913-022-08247-0
   Moe C, 2018, HEALTH SOC CARE COMM, V26, P113, DOI 10.1111/hsc.12471
   Montayre J, 2022, AUSTRALAS J AGEING, V41, P490, DOI 10.1111/ajag.13101
   Nguyen PY, 2023, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V7, pE313, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00025-6
   Nicholson C, 2012, SOC SCI MED, V75, P1426, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.011
   OECD, 1994, Careing for frail elderly people: new directions in care
   Osborne SP, 2016, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V18, P639, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927
   Pettersson B, 2020, BMJ OPEN, V10, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036194
   Pettersson B, 2019, BMC GERIATR, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12877-019-1063-9
   Pettersson C, 2022, SCAND J OCCUP THER, V29, P522, DOI 10.1080/11038128.2021.1967442
   Pfadenhauer LM, 2017, IMPLEMENT SCI, V12, DOI 10.1186/s13012-017-0552-5
   Polit D., 2012, NURSING RES GENERATI
   Proctor E, 2011, ADM POLICY MENT HLTH, V38, P65, DOI 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
   Rendon AA, 2012, AGE AGEING, V41, P549, DOI 10.1093/ageing/afs053
   Rostgaard T, 2022, EUR J AGEING, V19, P201, DOI 10.1007/s10433-022-00703-4
   Sallis J. F., 2008, Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice, V4th, P465
   Sandvin JT., 2020, Den norske og nordiske velferdsmodellen: kjennetegn og utfordringer. Velferdstjenestenes vilkr: Nasjonal politikk og lokale erfaringer, P28, DOI [10.18261/9788215034713-2020-3, DOI 10.18261/9788215034713-2020-3]
   Simonsick EM, 2005, J AM GERIATR SOC, V53, P198, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53103.x
   Snchez-Gonzlez D., 2021, HDB ACTIVE AGEING QU, P235, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-58031-514
   STOKOLS D, 1992, AM PSYCHOL, V47, P6, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.6
   Stokols D, 1996, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V10, P282, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.282
   Struthers NA, 2024, ENVIRON RES, V258, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119421
   Torfing J, 2019, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V21, P1, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248
   Trinkley Katy E, 2023, Implement Sci Commun, V4, P116, DOI 10.1186/s43058-023-00494-4
   Valentijn PP, 2015, INT J INTEGR CARE, V15, DOI 10.5334/IJIC.1513
   Valentijn PP, 2013, INT J INTEGR CARE, V13
   Warth L., 2016, The WHO global network of age-friendly cities and communities: Origins, P37, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-24031-23, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-24031-23]
   WHO, 2007, Global age-friendly cities: a guide
   Windrum P, 2016, EUR J INNOV MANAG, V19, P150, DOI 10.1108/EJIM-05-2015-0033
   Woolrych R, 2022, GERONTOLOGIST, V62, P119, DOI 10.1093/geront/gnab170
   World Health Organization, 2012, World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser, P1
   World Health Organization, Ageing and Health
   Zingmark M, 2023, SCAND J OCCUP THER, V30, P53, DOI 10.1080/11038128.2022.2089229
   Zingmark M, 2020, HEALTH SOC CARE COMM, V28, P1010, DOI 10.1111/hsc.12934
NR 84
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU BMC
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND
EI 1472-6963
J9 BMC HEALTH SERV RES
JI BMC Health Serv. Res.
PD DEC 18
PY 2024
VL 24
IS 1
AR 1580
DI 10.1186/s12913-024-12031-7
PG 16
WC Health Care Sciences & Services
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Health Care Sciences & Services
GA P9K9L
UT WOS:001381017500032
PM 39696265
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Laughlin, DC
AF Laughlin, Daniel C.
TI Unifying functional and population ecology to test the adaptive value of
   traits
SO BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
LA English
DT Article
DE demography; life history; population ecology; survival; reproduction;
   functional traits; convergent evolution; resource limitation;
   temperature; disturbance regime
ID FAST-SLOW CONTINUUM; ASSISTED MIGRATION; PLANT-COMMUNITIES; ROOT TRAITS;
   GAME-THEORY; MODEL; STRATEGIES; DYNAMICS; COMPETITION; LIMITATION
AB Plant strategies are phenotypes shaped by natural selection that enable populations to persist in a given environment. Plant strategy theory is essential for understanding the assembly of plant communities, predicting plant responses to climate change, and enhancing the restoration of our degrading biosphere. However, models of plant strategies vary widely and have tended to emphasize either functional traits or life-history traits at the expense of integrating both into a general framework to improve our ecological and evolutionary understanding of plant form and function. Advancing our understanding of plant strategies will require investment in two complementary research agendas that together will unify functional ecology and population ecology. First, we must determine what is phenotypically possible by quantifying the dimensionality of plant traits. This step requires dense taxonomic sampling of traits on species representing the broad diversity of phylogenetic clades, environmental gradients, and geographical regions found across Earth. It is important that we continue to sample traits locally and share data globally to fill biased gaps in trait databases. Second, we must test the power of traits for explaining species distributions, demographic rates, and population growth rates across gradients of resource limitation, disturbance regimes, temperature, vegetation density, and frequencies of other strategies. This step requires thoughtful, theory-driven empiricism. Reciprocal transplant experiments beyond the native range and synthetic demographic modelling are the most powerful methods to determine how trait-by-environment interactions influence fitness. Moving beyond easy-to-measure traits and evaluating the traits that are under the strongest ecological selection within different environmental contexts will improve our understanding of plant adaptations. Plant strategy theory is poised to (i) unpack the multiple dimensions of productivity and disturbance gradients and differentiate adaptations to climate and resource limitation from adaptations to disturbance, (ii) distinguish between the fundamental and realized niches of phenotypes, and (iii) articulate the distinctions and relationships between functional traits and life-history traits.
C1 [Laughlin, Daniel C.] Univ Wyoming, Bot Dept, Laramie, WY 82071 USA.
C3 University of Wyoming
RP Laughlin, DC (corresponding author), Univ Wyoming, Bot Dept, Laramie, WY 82071 USA.
EM daniel.laughlin@uwyo.edu
FU Division of Environmental Biology [DEB-1906243, OIA-2019528]; National
   Science Foundation; University of Wyoming Flittie Sabbatical
   Augmentation grant
FX Funding was provided by the National Science Foundation (DEB-1906243,
   OIA-2019528) and a University of Wyoming Flittie Sabbatical Augmentation
   grant.
CR Ackerly DD, 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P979, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0979:TEOPET]2.0.CO;2
   AERTS R, 1993, OIKOS, V66, P144, DOI 10.2307/3545208
   AERTS R, 1991, OECOLOGIA, V87, P551, DOI 10.1007/BF00320419
   Agrawal AA, 2006, ECOLOGY, V87, pS132, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[132:PDS]2.0.CO;2
   Angert AL, 2005, EVOLUTION, V59, P1671, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01817.x
   [Anonymous], 1997, The evolutionary biology of plants
   Tíscar PA, 2018, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V409, P719, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.014
   Arroyoa JI, 2022, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V119, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2119872119
   AUSTIN MP, 1989, VEGETATIO, V83, P35, DOI 10.1007/BF00031679
   Balazs KR, 2022, J ECOL, V110, P540, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13816
   Balazs KR, 2020, ECOL APPL, V30, DOI 10.1002/eap.2110
   Bazzaz F.A., 1996, PLANTS CHANGING ENV
   Berendse F., 1990, Perspectives on plant competition., P93
   Berger J, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abb2142
   BLOOM AJ, 1985, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V16, P363, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.002051
   Bond W., 1997, Plant functional types, P174
   Bond WJ, 2019, OPEN ECOSYSTEMS: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION BEYOND THE FOREST EDGE, P1
   Boonman CCF, 2020, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V29, P1034, DOI 10.1111/geb.13086
   Box E.O., 1981, MACROCLIMATE PLANT F
   Bruelheide H, 2018, NAT ECOL EVOL, V2, P1906, DOI 10.1038/s41559-018-0699-8
   Bueno CG, 2023, NATURE, V618, DOI 10.1038/s41586-023-06149-7
   Butler EE, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, pE10937, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1708984114
   Butt N, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V151, P317, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2294-z
   Carmona CP, 2021, NATURE, V597, P683, DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-03871-y
   Caswell Hal, 2001, pi
   Chang-Yang CH, 2021, J ECOL, V109, P2705, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13677
   CHAPIN FS, 1980, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V11, P233, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001313
   CHAPIN FS, 1993, AM NAT, V142, pS78, DOI 10.1086/285524
   Chase JM., 2003, Ecological niches: linking classical and contemporary approaches
   CLAPHAM AR, 1956, J ECOL, V44, P1, DOI 10.2307/2257151
   Clarke PJ, 2013, NEW PHYTOL, V197, P19, DOI 10.1111/nph.12001
   COLWELL RK, 1975, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V6, P281, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.06.110175.001433
   Colwell RK, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P19651, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0901650106
   Cornwell WK, 2019, ECOGRAPHY, V42, P1819, DOI 10.1111/ecog.04481
   Craine JM, 2005, J ECOL, V93, P1041, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01043.x
   Craine JM, 2009, Resource Strategies of Wild Plants
   Crockett JL, 2024, TREE PHYSIOL, V44, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpad136
   Dantas VL, 2020, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V29, P1288, DOI 10.1111/geb.13111
   Del Grosso S, 2008, ECOLOGY, V89, P2117, DOI 10.1890/07-0850.1
   Díaz S, 2016, NATURE, V529, P167, DOI 10.1038/nature16489
   Dybzinski R, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P1182, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12783
   Ellner S. P., 2016, Datadriven modelling of structured populations: A practical guide to the integral projection model
   Falster DS, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, pE2719, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1610206114
   Fan Y, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P10572, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1712381114
   Farrior CE, 2013, AM NAT, V181, P314, DOI 10.1086/669153
   Fiedler S, 2021, J APPL ECOL, V58, P1705, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.13900
   Garnier E., 2016, PLANT FUNCTIONAL DIV, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198757368.001.0001
   Goldberg D. E., 1990, Perspectives on plant competition., P27
   Grace J. B., 1990, Perspectives on plant competition., P51
   Grady KC, 2015, RESTOR ECOL, V23, P811, DOI 10.1111/rec.12245
   Grady KC, 2013, FUNCT ECOL, V27, P428, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12060
   Greenwood S, 2017, ECOL LETT, V20, P539, DOI 10.1111/ele.12748
   Grime J. P., 1979, Plant strategies and vegetation processes.
   GRIME JP, 1984, NEW PHYTOL, V98, P15, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1984.tb06096.x
   GRIME JP, 1977, AM NAT, V111, P1169, DOI 10.1086/283244
   Grime JP, 1997, OIKOS, V79, P259, DOI 10.2307/3546011
   Grubb P. J., 1980, NEW PHYTOL, V86, P123
   Grubb Peter J., 1998, Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics, V1, P3, DOI 10.1078/1433-8319-00049
   Guerrero-Ramírez NR, 2021, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V30, P25, DOI 10.1111/geb.13179
   Guiote C, 2023, OIKOS, V2023, DOI 10.1111/oik.09373
   Hargreaves AL, 2014, AM NAT, V183, P157, DOI 10.1086/674525
   Harper J., 1982, The Plant Community as a Working Mechanism, P11
   Harpole WS, 2011, ECOL LETT, V14, P852, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01651.x
   Hewitt N, 2011, BIOL CONSERV, V144, P2560, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.031
   Huston M.A., 1994, Biological Diversity. The coexistence of species on changing landscapes
   HUTCHINSON GE, 1957, COLD SPRING HARB SYM, V22, P415, DOI 10.1101/SQB.1957.022.01.039
   Iversen CM, 2017, NEW PHYTOL, V215, P15, DOI 10.1111/nph.14486
   Jackson ST, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P19685, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0901644106
   Kattge J, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P119, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14904
   Keddy P.A., 2022, A Framework for Community Ecology: Species Pools, Filters and Traits
   Keddy PamuL A., 2017, Plant Ecology
   Keith DA, 2007, J ECOL, V95, P1324, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01302.x
   Kelly R, 2021, ECOL LETT, V24, P970, DOI 10.1111/ele.13704
   Kimball S, 2012, OECOLOGIA, V169, P319, DOI 10.1007/s00442-011-2199-2
   KITAJIMA K, 1994, OECOLOGIA, V98, P419, DOI 10.1007/BF00324232
   Klimesová J, 2007, PERSPECT PLANT ECOL, V8, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.ppees.2006.10.002
   Klimesová J, 2018, FUNCT ECOL, V32, P2115, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13145
   Kramer-Walter KR, 2016, J ECOL, V104, P1299, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12562
   Kunstler G, 2016, NATURE, V529, P204, DOI 10.1038/nature16476
   Lalor AR, 2023, FRONT FOR GLOB CHANG, V6, DOI 10.3389/ffgc.2023.1198156
   Laughlin DC, 2023, NEW PHYTOL, V240, P1774, DOI 10.1111/nph.19276
   Laughlin DC, 2021, NAT ECOL EVOL, V5, P1123, DOI 10.1038/s41559-021-01471-7
   Laughlin DC, 2020, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V35, P1037, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2020.07.010
   Laughlin DC, 2018, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V9, P1764, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.13023
   Laughlin DC, 2017, RESTOR ECOL, V25, pS135, DOI 10.1111/rec.12342
   Laughlin DC, 2015, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V30, P487, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2015.06.003
   Laughlin DC, 2014, J ECOL, V102, P186, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12187
   Laughlin DC., 2023, PLANT STRATEGIES DEM
   Lee-Yaw JA, 2016, ECOL LETT, V19, P710, DOI 10.1111/ele.12604
   McGhee GR, 2011, VIENNA SER THEOR BIO, P1
   McGill BJ, 2006, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V21, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002
   McGill BJ, 2007, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V38, P403, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175517
   McNickle GG, 2016, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V283, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2016.1993
   McNickle GG, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P545, DOI 10.1111/ele.12071
   Moles AT, 2018, J ECOL, V106, P1, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12887
   Mouillot D, 2021, ECOL LETT, V24, P1988, DOI 10.1111/ele.13778
   NOBLE IR, 1980, VEGETATIO, V43, P5, DOI 10.1007/BF00121013
   Park A, 2023, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V537, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120854
   Pausas JG, 2015, FUNCT ECOL, V29, P315, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12372
   Pausas JG, 2014, NEW PHYTOL, V204, P55, DOI 10.1111/nph.12921
   Pavlick R, 2013, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V10, P4137, DOI 10.5194/bg-10-4137-2013
   Plumanns-Pouton E, 2024, BIOL CONSERV, V292, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110555
   Poorter H, 2009, NEW PHYTOL, V182, P565, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02830.x
   RAUNKIAER C., 1934
   Reich PB, 1997, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V94, P13730, DOI 10.1073/pnas.94.25.13730
   Reich PB, 1999, ECOLOGY, V80, P1955, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1955:GOLTRA]2.0.CO;2
   Reich PB, 2003, INT J PLANT SCI, V164, pS143, DOI 10.1086/374368
   ROSENZWEIG ML, 1986, OIKOS, V46, P339, DOI 10.2307/3565832
   Rüger N, 2018, ECOL LETT, V21, P1075, DOI 10.1111/ele.12974
   Salguero-Gómez R, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P230, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1506215112
   SalgueroGmez R., 2021, DEMOGRAPHIC METHODS
   Shipley B., 2010, From Plant Traits to Vegetation Structure: Chance and Selection in the Assembly of Ecological Communities
   Shugart H. H., 1984, A theory of forest dynamics. The ecological implications of forest succession models.
   Siefert A, 2023, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V14, P1035, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.14079
   Smith T., 1997, Plant Functional Types
   Snyder RE, 2018, AM NAT, V191, pE90, DOI 10.1086/696125
   Soberón J, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0175138
   Soberón J, 2007, ECOL LETT, V10, P1115, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01107.x
   SOUTHWOOD TRE, 1977, J ANIM ECOL, V46, P337
   Stearns S.C., 1992, pi
   Terborgh J, 2014, ECOLOGY, V95, P991, DOI 10.1890/13-0764.1
   Tilman D., 1982, Monographs in Population Biology, pi
   TILMAN D, 1988
   Tumber-Dávila SJ, 2022, NEW PHYTOL, V235, P1032, DOI 10.1111/nph.18031
   Gallagher RV, 2021, ONE EARTH, V4, P927, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.06.013
   Valen L. van, 1975, Biotropica, V7, P260, DOI 10.2307/2989738
   van der Valk A. G., 1985, POPULATION STRUCTURE, P293, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-5500-4_13
   VANDERVALK AG, 1978, ECOLOGY, V59, P322, DOI 10.2307/1936377
   VANDERVALK AG, 1981, ECOLOGY, V62, P688, DOI 10.2307/1937737
   Vincent Thomas L., 2005, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511542633.002
   Violle C, 2007, OIKOS, V116, P882, DOI 10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.15559.x
   Vitt P, 2010, BIOL CONSERV, V143, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.08.015
   Volaire F., 2018, Global Change Biology, V24, P2929
   Walker L.R., 1999, Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground
   Walker L.R., 2003, Primary succession and ecosystem rehabilitation
   Walker Lawrence R., 1999, V16, P1
   Wang YZ, 2019, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V17, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00572
   Weemstra M, 2016, NEW PHYTOL, V211, P1159, DOI 10.1111/nph.14003
   Weigelt A, 2023, NATURE, V618, pE29, DOI 10.1038/s41586-023-06148-8
   Weigelt A, 2021, NEW PHYTOL, V232, P42, DOI 10.1111/nph.17590
   Weiher E, 1999, J VEG SCI, V10, P609, DOI 10.2307/3237076
   Westoby M, 2002, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V33, P125, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150452
   Westoby M, 1998, PLANT SOIL, V199, P213, DOI 10.1023/A:1004327224729
   Westoby M, 2022, PLANT SOIL, V476, P527, DOI 10.1007/s11104-022-05411-7
   Whitham T.G., 2020, Riparian Research and Management: Past, Present, V2, P63
   Whitham TG, 2020, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V51, P587, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-011720-123655
   WISHEU IC, 1992, J VEG SCI, V3, P147, DOI 10.2307/3235675
   Wisheu IC, 1998, OIKOS, V83, P246, DOI 10.2307/3546836
   Woodward F., 1997, Plant functional types, P47
   Wright IJ, 2003, AM NAT, V161, P98, DOI 10.1086/344920
   Wright IJ, 2004, NATURE, V428, P821, DOI 10.1038/nature02403
   Zellweger F, 2020, SCIENCE, V368, P772, DOI 10.1126/science.aba6880
   Zirbel CR, 2020, ECOLOGY, V101, DOI 10.1002/ecy.2971
   Zirbel CR, 2017, J APPL ECOL, V54, P1070, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12885
NR 154
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 35
U2 45
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1464-7931
EI 1469-185X
J9 BIOL REV
JI Biol. Rev.
PD DEC
PY 2024
VL 99
IS 6
BP 1976
EP 1991
DI 10.1111/brv.13107
EA JUN 2024
PG 16
WC Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Other Topics
GA L1T1I
UT WOS:001241625100001
PM 38855941
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Tubi, A
   Israeli, Y
AF Tubi, Amit
   Israeli, Yael
TI Is climate migration successful adaptation or maladaptation? A holistic
   assessment of outcomes in Kenya
SO CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Migration; Successful adaptation; Maladaptation; Vulnerability; Climate
   change; Drought
ID RURAL-URBAN MIGRANTS; SOCIAL NETWORKS; LIVELIHOOD DIVERSIFICATION;
   TRANSNATIONAL FAMILIES; INTERNAL MIGRATION; LIFE SATISFACTION; LABOR
   MIGRATION; RESILIENCE; STRATEGIES; CONFLICT
AB Research is increasingly approaching migration as an adaptation to climate risk. Yet our understanding of the migration-adaptation nexus remains limited, as most studies conceptualize migration as either adaptive or maladaptive and focus on specific aspects of vulnerability. To advance a comprehensive understanding of migration's successful and maladaptive effects, this study employs a two-dimensional conceptualization of migration outcomes, encompassing a range of vulnerability variables at the migrant and household levels and migrants' well-being. This framework is applied to the case of drought-influenced migration from agro-pastoralist northern Kenya to the City of Nairobi. Based on semi-structured interviews with 40 long-term migrants, we identify quantitative and qualitative migration-induced changes in the examined variables. The results highlight the complexity of migration outcomes. Effects on the broad range of variables comprising vulnerability's exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity components are mixed. Migrants' ability to provide their families' basic needs has improved, although only half of the households could allocate remittances to reconstruct their drought-stricken livelihood sources in northern Kenya. Moreover, the profound change in social-environmental settings induced by migration exposed migrants to unfamiliar risks, such as urban crime, but also to new sources of adaptive capacity, such as knowledge enabling the development of climate-insensitive livelihoods. However, migration's partial success in reducing vulnerability came at the expense of migrants' well-being, which diminished drastically. These findings stress the need for fundamental changes in the migration-as-adaptation literature, including a more thorough engagement with the temporalities and scope of migration's effects on adaptation, greater attention to the tradeoffs that are integral to migration as adaptation, and a shift to analytical frameworks that consider maladaptive effects alongside successful ones. We argue that these changes are essential to develop interventions that maximize migration's adaptive potential while minimizing its maladaptive effects.
C1 [Tubi, Amit; Israeli, Yael] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Geog, IL-9190501 Jerusalem, Israel.
C3 Hebrew University of Jerusalem
RP Tubi, A (corresponding author), Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Geog, IL-9190501 Jerusalem, Israel.
EM amit.tubi@mail.huji.ac.il; yael.israeli1@mail.huji.ac.il
OI Tubi, Amit/0000-0002-4523-9141
FU Israel Science Foundation [1713/19]
FX This work was supported by the Israel Science Foundation research grant
   number 1713/19. The funding source was not involved in this research or
   the resulting publication.Compliance with Ethical Standards.This study
   was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Hebrew University
   of Jerusalem and the United States Inter-national University-Africa. All
   interviews were held only after informed consent was obtained from each
   participant, subsequent to reading the informed consent statement in
   Swahili. The research was conducted under permit number
   NACOSTI/P/19/25935/27607, granted by Kenya's National Commission for
   Science, Technology and Innovation.
CR Abel GJ, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V54, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.12.003
   Abrego L, 2009, J MARRIAGE FAM, V71, P1070, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00653.x
   Adams EA, 2021, HEALTH PLACE, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102500
   Adano WR, 2012, J PEACE RES, V49, P65, DOI 10.1177/0022343311427344
   Adger WN, 2021, J PEACE RES, V58, P50, DOI 10.1177/0022343320973717
   Ahmed B, 2018, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V10, P5, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2016-0149
   Anbacha AE, 2021, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V79, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.rama.2021.06.006
   Anderson KJ, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V65, DOI [10.1016/j./gloenvcha.2020.102193, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102193]
   [Anonymous], 2022, Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, P2897, DOI [10. 1017/9781009325844.029, 10.1017/9781009325844.029, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844.029]
   Antwi-Agyei P, 2018, CLIM RISK MANAG, V19, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2017.11.003
   Arenas E, 2021, J MARRIAGE FAM, V83, P1401, DOI 10.1111/jomf.12776
   Arnall A, 2021, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102289
   Askarov Z, 2020, WORLD DEV, V129, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104860
   Ayeb-Karlsson S, 2021, CLIM DEV, V13, P348, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2020.1777078
   Banerjee S, 2019, POPUL SPACE PLACE, V25, DOI 10.1002/psp.2157
   Bayrak MM, 2022, CLIM DEV, V14, P935, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2022.2028596
   Belloni M, 2020, J ETHN MIGR STUD, V46, P336, DOI 10.1080/1369183X.2019.1584698
   Bernardo ABI, 2022, PSYCHOL STUD, V67, P372, DOI 10.1007/s12646-022-00661-y
   Bettini G, 2017, GLOB POLICY, V8, P33, DOI 10.1111/1758-5899.12404
   Blackmore I, 2021, CLIM RISK MANAG, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100279
   Boas I, 2022, J ETHN MIGR STUD, V48, P3365, DOI 10.1080/1369183X.2022.2066264
   Borderon M, 2021, HUM SOC SCI COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1057/s41599-021-00999-0
   Borderon M, 2019, DEMOGR RES, V41, P491, DOI 10.4054/DemRes.2019.41.18
   Bukachi SA, 2021, WATER INT, V46, P677, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2021.1940715
   Cai S, 2018, CHINA ECON REV, V52, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2018.06.005
   Cain M, 2020, LEISURE STUD, V39, P68, DOI 10.1080/02614367.2019.1581248
   Caretta MA, 2023, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V176, DOI 10.1007/s10584-023-03573-6
   Castro B, 2022, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102555
   Chandni Singh Chandni Singh, 2019, Migration and Development, V8, P301
   Chen J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V113, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.007
   Choithani C, 2017, GEOGR RES-AUST, V55, P192, DOI 10.1111/1745-5871.12223
   Choudhury P, 2016, J ECON GEOGR, V16, P585, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbv025
   Clement Viviane, 2021, Groundswell Part 2: Acting on Internal Climate Migration
   Coppock DL, 2018, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V71, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.rama.2017.05.004
   Coulthard S, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P453, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.003
   de Haas H, 2021, COMP MIGR STUD, V9, DOI 10.1186/s40878-020-00210-4
   de Sherbinin A, 2012, ENVIRON RES LETT, V7, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/045602
   Debnath M, 2022, GEOJOURNAL, V87, P5367, DOI 10.1007/s10708-022-10587-7
   Doria MD, 2009, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V12, P810, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.04.001
   Dun O, 2018, ASIA PAC VIEWP, V59, P276, DOI 10.1111/apv.12198
   Ensor JE, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V94, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.01.013
   Entzinger H, 2022, MIGR STUD, V10, P24, DOI 10.1093/migration/mnac006
   Fazey I, 2010, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V8, P414, DOI 10.1890/080215
   Few R, 2021, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V12, DOI 10.1002/wcc.687
   Fouts HN, 2021, SOC DEV, V30, P713, DOI 10.1111/sode.12503
   Gatina L, 2016, J BEHAV EXP ECON, V63, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.018
   Gautam Y, 2017, MT RES DEV, V37, P436, DOI 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-17-00035.1
   Gemenne F, 2017, GEOGR J, V183, P336, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12205
   Government of Kenya, 2012, Vision 2030 development strategy for northern Kenya and other arid lands
   Haagsman K, 2015, ETHNIC RACIAL STUD, V38, P2652, DOI 10.1080/01419870.2015.1037783
   Hardt JN, 2021, POLITICS GOV, V9, P5, DOI 10.17645/pag.v9i4.4573
   Hauck S, 2017, PASTORALISM, V7, DOI 10.1186/s13570-017-0090-4
   Hoffmann EM, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0214511
   Hoffmann R, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P904, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0898-6
   Huang SL, 2017, FRONT PSYCHOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00819
   Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC), GRID 2023: Internal displacement and food security
   International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), 2014, Emergency appeal operations update: Kenya drought
   Jacobson C, 2019, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V19, P101, DOI 10.1007/s10113-018-1387-6
   Jakobsson E, 2021, POLITICS GOV, V9, P16, DOI 10.17645/pag.v9i4.4519
   Johnson JE, 2019, QUANT ECON, V10, P565, DOI 10.3982/QE962
   Jorgensen NJ, 2017, GEOGR CHILD YOUNG, V10, P453, DOI 10.1007/978-981-287-032-2_26
   Juhola S, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V55, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.09.014
   Kamau N, 2018, J HEALTH CARE POOR U, V29, P321, DOI 10.1353/hpu.2018.0022
   Kelly K.D., 2021, SN. Soc. Sci., V1, P11, DOI [10.1007/s43545-020-00012-6, DOI 10.1007/S43545-020-00012-6]
   Klepp S, 2020, SOC SCI-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/socsci9050078
   Kluger LC, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102095
   Knight J, 2010, WORLD DEV, V38, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.03.002
   Korzenevica M, 2020, GEOFORUM, V112, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.04.004
   Koska OA, 2013, INT REV ECON FINANC, V28, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.iref.2013.05.006
   Koubi V, 2021, J PEACE RES, V58, P18, DOI 10.1177/0022343320972153
   Koubi V, 2019, ANNU REV POLIT SCI, V22, P343, DOI 10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070830
   Kratz F, 2020, MIGR STUD, V8, P307, DOI 10.1093/migration/mny040
   Li J, 2017, HEALTH PLACE, V48, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.08.009
   Li Y, 2010, HEALTH PROMOT INT, V25, P371, DOI 10.1093/heapro/daq020
   Lind J, 2020, PASTORALISM, V10, DOI 10.1186/s13570-020-00179-w
   Linke AM, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aad8cc
   Liu Y, 2020, POPUL SPACE PLACE, V26, DOI 10.1002/psp.2336
   Liu YQ, 2021, URBAN STUD, V58, P2490, DOI 10.1177/0042098020954780
   Liu YX, 2022, BMJ OPEN, V12, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060628
   Liu Z, 2020, POPUL SPACE PLACE, V26, DOI 10.1002/psp.2334
   Loebach P, 2016, POPUL ENVIRON, V38, P185, DOI 10.1007/s11111-016-0256-9
   Lönnqvist JE, 2015, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V45, P496, DOI 10.1002/ejsp.2105
   Maharjan A, 2021, CLIM DEV, V13, P879, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2020.1867044
   Maharjan A, 2020, CURR CLIM CHANGE REP, V6, P1, DOI 10.1007/s40641-020-00153-z
   Mazzucato V, 2017, GLOBAL NETW, V17, P89, DOI 10.1111/glob.12132
   Mburu L, 2017, APPL SPAT ANAL POLIC, V10, P189, DOI 10.1007/s12061-015-9178-7
   McCabe JT, 2014, HUM ORGAN, V73, P389, DOI 10.17730/humo.73.4.vkr10nhr65g18400
   McLeman R, 2021, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V165, DOI 10.1007/s10584-021-03056-6
   McNamara KE, 2018, CLIM POLICY, V18, P111, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2016.1248886
   Meloni F, 2020, J ETHN MIGR STUD, V46, P423, DOI 10.1080/1369183X.2019.1584703
   Mianabadi A, 2022, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V65, P852, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2021.1915259
   Miller Todd., 2017, Storming the Wall: Climate Change, Migration, and Homeland Security
   Mitra S, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P103, DOI 10.1177/0956247816689218
   Morales-Muñoz H, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12145702
   Moura K, 2016, URBAN STUD, V53, P1559, DOI 10.1177/0042098015580899
   Mueller V, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102183
   Mueller V, 2020, WORLD DEV, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104704
   Munshi K, 2020, ANNU REV ECON, V12, P503, DOI 10.1146/annurev-economics-082019-031419
   National Drought Management Authority (NDMA), 2017, National drought early warning bulletin
   Nawrotzki RJ, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V140, P243, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1849-0
   Neog BJ, 2022, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V171, DOI 10.1007/s10584-022-03334-x
   New M., 2022, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change., P1041
   Ng'ang'a SK, 2016, WORLD DEV, V84, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.04.002
   Ng'ang'a TW, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V161, P393, DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02696-4
   Nicholson SE, 2017, REV GEOPHYS, V55, P590, DOI 10.1002/2016RG000544
   Niva V, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11123487
   Nowok B, 2013, ENVIRON PLANN A, V45, P986, DOI 10.1068/a45287
   Ochieng V.O., 2022, The Routledge Handbook of African Demography, P535, DOI [10.4324/9780429287213, DOI 10.4324/9780429287213]
   Okumu W, 2017, J MOD AFR STUD, V55, P479, DOI [10.1017/s0022278x17000118, 10.1017/S0022278X17000118]
   Opiyo F, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V6, P295, DOI 10.1007/s13753-015-0063-4
   Owuor MO, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102480
   Paloma V, 2021, APPL RES QUAL LIFE, V16, P435, DOI 10.1007/s11482-020-09832-3
   Pandey A, 2022, ASIAN PAC MIGR J, V31, P426, DOI 10.1177/01171968231154660
   Pandey R., 2021, Nepal. Migration and Development, V10, P313, DOI [10.1080/21632324.2019.1634313, DOI 10.1080/21632324.2019.1634313]
   Paparusso A, 2019, APPL RES QUAL LIFE, V14, P479, DOI 10.1007/s11482-018-9624-1
   Piggott-McKellar AE, 2019, SOC SCI-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/socsci8050133
   Piguet E, 2022, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V13, DOI 10.1002/wcc.746
   Plänitz E, 2019, URBAN CLIM, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100533
   Prtner H.-O., 2022, CLIMATE CHANGE 2022, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009325844.009
   Quandt A., 2016, African Journal of Rural Development, V1, P51, DOI [DOI 10.22004/AG.ECON.263575, 10.22004/AG.ECON.263575]
   Radel C, 2018, WORLD DEV, V108, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.023
   Ramiaramanana FN, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13020149
   Rao N, 2020, WORLD DEV, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104667
   Rao N, 2019, GEOFORUM, V102, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.03.017
   Redehegn MA, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0210034
   Rigaud K.K., 2021, World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
   Rigaud KantaKumari., 2018, GROUNDSWELL PREPARIN
   Rockenbauch T, 2019, GEOFORUM, V107, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.09.009
   Rufino MC, 2013, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V179, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2013.08.019
   Ryan L, 2009, J ETHN MIGR STUD, V35, P61, DOI 10.1080/13691830802489176
   Sahin O, 2021, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V21, DOI 10.1007/s10113-021-01809-8
   Sakdapolrak P, 2024, CLIM DEV, V16, P87, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2023.2180318
   Saliba S., 2022, Climate migration in Mexican and Central American cities
   Scheffran J, 2012, APPL GEOGR, V33, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.10.002
   Schilling J., 2014, Conflictsensitive adaptation to climate change in Africa, P241
   Schrepfer N, 2014, On the margin: Kenya's pastoralists
   Shubin S, 2022, EMOTIONS, V6, P257, DOI 10.1163/2208522X-02010167
   Siddiqui T, 2021, GLOB POLICY, V12, P91, DOI 10.1111/1758-5899.12855
   Silchenko D, 2023, CLIM RISK MANAG, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2022.100472
   Silvestri S, 2012, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V12, P791, DOI 10.1007/s10113-012-0293-6
   Singh C, 2020, GEOGR J, V186, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12328
   Sinha S, 2022, WORLD DEV, V159, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106031
   Skilling L, 2017, CRIME PREV COMMUNITY, V19, P103, DOI 10.1057/s41300-017-0017-4
   Song GW, 2020, CITIES, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102624
   Song JY, 2023, POPUL SPACE PLACE, V29, DOI 10.1002/psp.2610
   Song J, 2019, CITIES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.012
   Szaboova L, 2023, ONE EARTH, V6, P620, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.05.009
   Szaboova L, 2022, POPUL SPACE PLACE, V28, DOI 10.1002/psp.2505
   Tebboth MGL, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V54, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.12.002
   Tebboth MGL, 2023, ECOL SOC, V28, DOI 10.5751/ES-13626-280136
   Titze L, 2021, FRONT PSYCHOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701544
   Tubi A, 2021, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V12, DOI 10.1002/wcc.695
   Uhe P, 2018, INT J CLIMATOL, V38, pE554, DOI 10.1002/joc.5389
   United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA), 2011, Eastern Africa: Drought - humanitarian snapshot
   United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA), 2017, Horn of Africa: A call for action
   United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), 2020, Report on the urban safety governance assessment in Mathare, Nairobi City
   van Heelsum A, 2016, ETHNIC RACIAL STUD, V39, P1301, DOI 10.1080/01419870.2016.1159711
   Vikram K, 2021, INT MIGR REV, V55, P964, DOI 10.1177/0197918321989279
   Vinke K, 2022, POPUL ENVIRON, V43, P319, DOI 10.1007/s11111-021-00393-7
   Vinke K, 2020, MIGR STUD, V8, P626, DOI 10.1093/migration/mnaa029
   Visser SS, 2015, GENDER PLACE CULT, V22, P608, DOI 10.1080/0966369X.2014.885891
   Wafula WM, 2022, PASTORALISM, V12, DOI 10.1186/s13570-021-00204-6
   Warner K, 2014, CLIM DEV, V6, P1, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2013.835707
   Weatherill C.K., 2023, Resisting climate change vulnerability: Feminist and decolonial insights, DOI [10.1057/s41311-023-00523-y, DOI 10.1057/S41311-023-00523-Y]
   Wen M, 2010, HEALTH PLACE, V16, P452, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.12.001
   Wiederkehr C, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aae6de
   Wiegel H, 2019, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V10, DOI 10.1002/wcc.610
   Wisner B., 2004, At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters
   Woodhouse E, 2018, ECOL SOC, V23, DOI 10.5751/ES-09986-230143
   World Bank, 2020, Climate risk country profile: Kenya
   Yu KZ, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16142597
   Yue ZS, 2019, ASIAN POPUL STUD, V15, P302, DOI 10.1080/17441730.2019.1664525
   Zhang ZN, 2017, SOC SCI RES, V61, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.06.020
   Zheng BD, 2022, CHIN POLITICAL SCI R, V7, P197, DOI 10.1007/s41111-021-00187-0
   Zhong H, 2017, J RES CRIME DELINQ, V54, P479, DOI 10.1177/0022427816676861
NR 175
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 6
U2 7
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0963
J9 CLIM RISK MANAG
JI CLIM. RISK MANAG.
PY 2024
VL 44
AR 100614
DI 10.1016/j.crm.2024.100614
EA APR 2024
PG 19
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA ST6C0
UT WOS:001236726700001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Gianelli, I
   Ortega, L
   Pittman, J
   Vasconcellos, M
   Defeo, O
AF Gianelli, Ignacio
   Ortega, Leonardo
   Pittman, Jeremy
   Vasconcellos, Marcelo
   Defeo, Omar
TI Harnessing scientific and local knowledge to face climate change in
   small-scale fisheries
SO GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE Small-scale fisheries; Climate change; Warming hotspots; Local
   ecological knowledge; Co-management; Adaptive capacity
ID SEA-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE; COASTAL COMMUNITIES;
   ECOSYSTEM APPROACH; CHANGE IMPACTS; ALGAL BLOOMS; ADAPTATION; OCEAN;
   MARINE; COMANAGEMENT
AB Small-scale fisheries in developing regions are particularly vulnerable to climate change, but the assessment of climate-induced changes and impacts are often hampered by the data poor-situation of these social-ecological systems. Based on 40 years of scientific and local ecological knowledge, we provide a coherent narrative about the effects of a marine hotspot of climate change on a small-scale fishery across different geographical and temporal scales. We applied a mixed-methods approach to assess biophysical changes, social-ecological impacts, and the incremental spectrum of actions implemented at multiple levels to increase the adaptive capacity of a small-scale clam fishery. The warming hotspot here analyzed was the fastest-warming region in the South Atlantic Ocean. Long-term changes in wind intensity and direction were also noticeable at a regional scale. Both sea surface temperature and winds showed a clear shifting pattern in the late 1990 s. These climate-related stressors determined ecosystem and targeted population changes (e.g. clam mass mortalities, slow stock recovery rates after ecological shocks, habitat narrowing), and favored harmful algal bloom-forming organisms. Climate-induced drivers also affected the human component of the social-ecological system, preventing fishers from securing a fulltime livelihood and limiting the fishery economic potential. Adaptive responses at multiple levels provided some capacity to address climate change effects, and transformative pathways are being taken to adapt to climate-induced changes over the long-term. Transformative changes were fostered by the local perception of environmental change, shared narratives, sustained scientific monitoring programs, and the interaction between knowledge systems, facilitated by a bridging organization within a broader process of governance transformation. The combination of autonomous adaptations (based on linking social capital and fishery leaders agency) and government-led adaptations were essential to face the challenges imposed by climate change. Our results serve as a learning platform to anticipate threats and envision solutions to a wide range of small-scale fisheries in fast-warming regions worldwide.
C1 [Gianelli, Ignacio; Defeo, Omar] Fac Ciencias, Lab Ciencias Mar, Montevideo, Uruguay.
   [Ortega, Leonardo; Defeo, Omar] Direcc Nacl Recursos Acuat, Montevideo, Uruguay.
   [Pittman, Jeremy] Univ Waterloo, Fac Environm, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
   [Vasconcellos, Marcelo] FAO, Div Fisheries, Rome, Italy.
C3 Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay; University of Waterloo; Food &
   Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
RP Gianelli, I; Defeo, O (corresponding author), Fac Ciencias, Lab Ciencias Mar, Montevideo, Uruguay.
EM ignaciogianelli@gmail.com; odefeo@dinara.gub.uy
RI Pittman, Jeremy/N-4355-2015
FU Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research [SGP-HW 017];
   Comision Sectorial de Investigacion Cientifica (CSIC Grupos) [32]
FX We would like to express our gratitude to all the people who
   participated since 1982 in monitoring and studying the socialecological
   system of the yellow clam fishery. This work would not have been
   possible without them. We are particularly grateful to the yellow clam
   fishing community for their hospitality and for sharing their knowledge
   and experience. Special thanks to Ramon "Nino" Aguero, who kindly
   provided his consent for the use of his memoir entitled "Mis
   experiencias en el mar", which synthesizes more than 45 years of fishing
   experience in the yellow clam fishery. We are grateful for the support
   provided by the InterAmerican Institute for Global Change Research
   (grant SGP-HW 017) and Comision Sectorial de Investigacion Cientifica
   (CSIC Grupos ID 32) . Two referees provided insightful comments that
   substantially improved the manuscript.
CR Badjeck MC, 2010, MAR POLICY, V34, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.08.007
   Belkin I.., 2016, IOC UNESCO UNEP 2016, P101
   Béné C, 2016, WORLD DEV, V79, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.007
   Bennett NJ, 2018, ENVIRON MANAGE, V61, P597, DOI 10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2
   Bennett NJ, 2016, CONSERV BIOL, V30, P582, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12681
   Berdej SM, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0147142
   Berkes F., 2015, BRIDGING SCALES KNOW, P315
   Berkes F, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V90, P1692, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001
   Bertrand Arnaud, 2018, FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper, V627, P325
   Bindoff N L., IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate 2019, P477
   Bodin Ö, 2017, SCIENCE, V357, P659, DOI 10.1126/science.aan1114
   Bodin Ö, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002
   Burrows MT, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P652, DOI 10.1126/science.1210288
   Castilla JC, 2001, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V11, P1, DOI 10.1023/A:1014235924952
   Chan MN, 2019, ICES J MAR SCI, V76, P913, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsy193
   Cinner JE, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.018
   Cinner JE, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P117, DOI 10.1038/s41558-017-0065-x
   Cochrane KL, 2019, FRONT MAR SCI, V5, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2018.00505
   Cohen PJ, 2019, FRONT MAR SCI, V6, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2019.00171
   Cuellar-Martinez T, 2018, FRONT MAR SCI, V5, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2018.00409
   DAmbrosio L., 2020, TEKOPORA, V2, P90
   Daw T., 2009, CLIMATE CHANGE IMPLI, P107
   Defeo O, 1996, REV CHIL HIST NAT, V69, P605
   Defeo O, 2016, FISH FISH, V17, P176, DOI 10.1111/faf.12101
   Defeo O, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05971-180430
   Engle NL, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P647, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.019
   Epstein G, 2015, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V14, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.005
   FAO, 2015, VOL GUID SECUR SUST
   Fedele G, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V101, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.001
   Fiedler PC, 2002, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V244, P265, DOI 10.3354/meps244265
   Franco B., FRONT MAR SCI, V7
   Franco BC, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V162, P2359, DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02783-6
   Galappaththi EK, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V92, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.005
   Gianelli I, 2018, MAR POLICY, V95, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.03.020
   Gianelli I, 2019, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V625, P115, DOI 10.3354/meps13035
   Gianelli I, 2019, FISH RES, V209, P242, DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2018.09.028
   Gianelli I, 2015, MAR POLICY, V62, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.09.025
   Gobler CJ, 2020, HARMFUL ALGAE, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.hal.2019.101731
   Gobler CJ, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P4975, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1619575114
   Grafton RQ, 2005, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V48, P753, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2005.08.003
   Gray NJ, 2016, INT J COMMONS, V10, P1013, DOI 10.18352/ijc.643
   Grunblatt J, 2017, SUSTAIN SCI, V12, P3, DOI 10.1007/s11625-016-0394-0
   Gutiérrez NL, 2011, NATURE, V470, P386, DOI 10.1038/nature09689
   Hanich Q, 2018, MAR POLICY, V88, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.011
   Hattenrath-Lehmann TK, 2013, HARMFUL ALGAE, V26, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.hal.2013.03.005
   Herrfahrdt-Pähle E, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102097
   Hobday AJ, 2016, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V26, P249, DOI 10.1007/s11160-016-9419-0
   Hobday AJ, 2014, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V24, P415, DOI 10.1007/s11160-013-9326-6
   Huang BY, 2015, J CLIMATE, V28, P911, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00006.1
   Huntington HP, 2000, ECOL APPL, V10, P1270, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1270:UTEKIS]2.0.CO;2
   Kaiser BA, 2019, FRONT MAR SCI, V6, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2019.00309
   Kalikoski Daniela C., 2018, FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper, V627, P19
   Kalnay E, 1996, B AM METEOROL SOC, V77, P437, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO;2
   Lercari D, 2018, ECOL MODEL, V368, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.11.007
   Leyba IM, 2019, CLIM DYNAM, V53, P4141, DOI 10.1007/s00382-019-04777-2
   Manta G, 2017, J COASTAL RES, V33, P531, DOI 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-16-00054.1
   Martins IM, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V147, P441, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2144-z
   McClenachan L, 2019, FISH FISH, V20, P1111, DOI 10.1111/faf.12400
   McLachlan A, 2018, ECOLOGY OF SANDY SHORES, 3RD EDITION, P1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-809467-9.00001-1
   Moore ML, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06966-190454
   Moore SK, 2019, MAR POLICY, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103543
   Muter BA, 2013, CONSERV BIOL, V27, P187, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01952.x
   Nayak PK, 2018, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V161, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.04.020
   Nykvist B, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06167-190247
   Ojea E, 2020, ONE EARTH, V2, P544, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.05.012
   Ortega L, 2016, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V545, P203, DOI 10.3354/meps11643
   Ortega L, 2013, J COASTAL RES, V29, P747, DOI 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-13-00003.1
   Ortega L, 2012, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V469, P71, DOI 10.3354/meps10016
   PAULY D, 1995, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V10, P430, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89171-5
   Pecl GT, 2019, AMBIO, V48, P1498, DOI 10.1007/s13280-019-01186-x
   Pecl GT, 2014, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V24, P409, DOI 10.1007/s11160-014-9355-9
   Pittman Jeremy, 2019, FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper, V644, P9
   PNA Agro, 2019, PLAN NAC AD VAR CAM, P125
   Popova E, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P2038, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13247
   Proenca L.A.O., 2007, Harmful Algae News, V33, P19
   Proenca L.A.O., 2017, 17 INT C HARMF ALG F, P212
   Rathwell KJ, 2015, INT J COMMONS, V9, P851, DOI 10.18352/ijc.584
   Rayner NA, 2003, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V108, DOI 10.1029/2002JD002670
   Schoeman DS, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P2383, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12505
   Shiffman DS, 2020, ISCIENCE, V23, DOI 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101205
   Spijkers J, 2018, FISH FISH, V19, P798, DOI 10.1111/faf.12291
   Sumaila UR, 2011, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V1, P449, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1301
   Thornton TF, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-04714-170308
   Westlund L., 2019, FAO FISHERIES AQUACU, P184
   Wise RM, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002
   Wouters N, 2015, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V152, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2014.10.017
   Wyllie de Echeverria VR, 2019, AMBIO, V48, P1447, DOI 10.1007/s13280-019-01218-6
   Yang H, 2020, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V47, DOI 10.1029/2019GL085868
NR 88
TC 35
Z9 38
U1 3
U2 53
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0959-3780
EI 1872-9495
J9 GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG
JI Glob. Environ. Change-Human Policy Dimens.
PD MAY
PY 2021
VL 68
AR 102253
DI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102253
EA APR 2021
PG 12
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies; Geography
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography
GA SU7WE
UT WOS:000663341900005
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Cheng, J
   Zhang, ZX
   Li, YL
   Zhang, LW
   Hui, M
   Sha, ZL
AF Cheng, Jiao
   Zhang, Zhixin
   Li, Yulong
   Zhang, Liwen
   Hui, Min
   Sha, Zhongli
TI Rolling with the punches: Organism-environment interactions shape
   spatial pattern of adaptive differentiation in the widespread mantis
   shrimp <i>Oratosquilla oratoria</i>
SO SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate adaptation; Adaptive diversity; Temperature selection;
   Demographic history; Hybrid zone
ID PALEOCEANOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION; TOOL SET; ADAPTATION; CLIMATE; TEMPERATURE;
   SELECTION; HISTORY; JAPAN; ASSOCIATION; DIVERGENCE
AB Investigating spatial pattern of adaptive variation and its underlying processes can inform the adaptive potential distributed within species ranges, which is increasingly important in the context of a changing climate. A correct interpretation of adaptive variation pattern requires that population history and the ensuing population genetic structure are taken into account. Here we carried out such a study by integrating population genomic analyses, demographic model testing and species distribution modeling to investigate patterns and causes of adaptive differentiation in a widespread mantis shrimp, Oratosquilla oratoria, along a replicated, broad -scale temperature gradient in the northwestern Pacific (NWP). Our results supported a strong hierarchical ecogeographic structure dominated by habitat -linked divergence among O. oratoria populations accompanied with introgressive hybridization. A combined FST outlier and environmental correlation analyses revealed remarkable temperatureassociated clines in allele frequency across paired North -South populations on Chinese and Japanese coasts, and identified a suite of loci associated with temperature adaptation. Further demographic model testing revealed the observed clinal variation derived partly from Pleistocene divergence followed by recent secondary contact. More importantly, the likelihood of hybridization is predicted to increase as climate change progresses, which would break barriers to gene flow and enable the spread of adaptive genetic variation. These results support that not only is temperature -driven adaptive differentiation occurs in O. oratoria but that such pattern is likely attributed to ancient adaptive variation, sustained by contemporary ocean conditions and a semi -permeable barrier to gene flow maintained by selection. They moreover provide genomic insights into the distribution of adaptive potential across O. oratoria' s species range. This work can serve as a case study to characterize adaptive diversity of marine species in the NWP by integrating environmental and genetic data at temporal and spatial scales in a population genomic framework, which would improve management and conservation actions under climate change.
C1 [Cheng, Jiao; Zhang, Liwen; Hui, Min; Sha, Zhongli] Chinese Acad Sci, Dept Marine Organism Taxon & Phylogeny, Inst Oceanol, Qingdao 266071, Peoples R China.
   [Cheng, Jiao; Hui, Min; Sha, Zhongli] Laoshan Lab, Lab Marine Biol & Biotechnol, Qingdao 266237, Peoples R China.
   [Cheng, Jiao; Hui, Min; Sha, Zhongli] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Oceanol, Shandong Prov Key Lab Expt Marine Biol, Qingdao 266071, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Zhixin] Chinese Acad Sci, South China Sea Inst Oceanol, CAS Key Lab Trop Marine Bioresources & Ecol, Guangzhou 510301, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Zhixin] Chinese Acad Sci, South China Sea Inst Oceanol, Global Ocean & Climate Res Ctr, Guangzhou 510275, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Yulong] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Oceanol, CAS Key Lab Marine Ecol & Environm Sci, Qingdao 266071, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Liwen] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
   [Sha, Zhongli] 7 Nanhai Rd, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, Peoples R China.
C3 Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Oceanology, CAS; Laoshan
   Laboratory; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Oceanology, CAS;
   Chinese Academy of Sciences; South China Sea Institute of Oceanology,
   CAS; Chinese Academy of Sciences; South China Sea Institute of
   Oceanology, CAS; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Oceanology,
   CAS; Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy of
   Sciences, CAS
RP Sha, ZL (corresponding author), 7 Nanhai Rd, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, Peoples R China.
EM shazl@qdio.ac.cn
RI sha, zhongli/N-7275-2013; Zhang, Zhixin/AAB-8434-2019
FU National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars [42025603];
   National Natural Science Foundation of China [42276145, 31872569];
   Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
   [XDB42000000]; Development fund of South China Sea Institute of
   Oceanology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [SCSIO202208]
FX This work was supported by the National Science Foundation for
   Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 42025603) , the National Natural
   Science Foundation of China (No. 42276145, 31872569) , the Strategic
   Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.
   XDB42000000) , and the Development fund of South China Sea Institute of
   Oceanology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (SCSIO202208) .
CR Alexander DH, 2009, GENOME RES, V19, P1655, DOI 10.1101/gr.094052.109
   Anderson EC, 2002, GENETICS, V160, P1217
   [Anonymous], 2015, E ASIAN SEAS REGIONA
   Assis J, 2018, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V27, P277, DOI 10.1111/geb.12693
   Barber PH, 2002, MOL ECOL, V11, P659, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01468.x
   Barve N, 2011, ECOL MODEL, V222, P1810, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.011
   Basher Z., 2018, World Wide Web Electronic Publication
   Bay RA, 2018, SCIENCE, V359, P83, DOI 10.1126/science.aan4380
   Bierne N, 2013, CURR ZOOL, V59, P72, DOI 10.1093/czoolo/59.1.72
   Bradbury IR, 2015, MOL ECOL, V24, P5130, DOI 10.1111/mec.13395
   Bradbury IR, 2010, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V277, P3725, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.0985
   BULLOCK TH, 1955, BIOL REV, V30, P311, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1955.tb01211.x
   Bustelo XR, 2007, BIOESSAYS, V29, P356, DOI 10.1002/bies.20558
   Catchen J, 2013, MOL ECOL, V22, P3124, DOI 10.1111/mec.12354
   Chen J, 2012, GENETICS, V191, P865, DOI 10.1534/genetics.112.140749
   Cheng J, 2022, FRONT MAR SCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2022.975686
   Cheng J, 2020, PEERJ, V8, DOI 10.7717/peerj.10270
   Cheng J, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-02059-7
   Conesa A, 2005, BIOINFORMATICS, V21, P3674, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610
   Conover DO, 2006, J FISH BIOL, V69, P21, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01274.x
   Conover DO, 2009, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1168, P100, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04575.x
   Danecek P, 2011, BIOINFORMATICS, V27, P2156, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330
   Darwin C, 2009, ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511694295.004
   Davis MB, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P673, DOI 10.1126/science.292.5517.673
   de Lafontaine G, 2018, ECOLOGY, V99, P1530, DOI 10.1002/ecy.2382
   Dhaka A, 2006, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V29, P135, DOI 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112958
   Dormann CF, 2013, ECOGRAPHY, V36, P27, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
   Du XW, 2016, BIOCHEM SYST ECOL, V66, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.bse.2016.02.033
   Elshire RJ, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019379
   Excoffier L, 2013, PLOS GENET, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003905
   Exposito-Alonso M, 2018, NAT ECOL EVOL, V2, P352, DOI 10.1038/s41559-017-0423-0
   Eyre-Walker A, 2007, NAT REV GENET, V8, P610, DOI 10.1038/nrg2146
   Felder S, 2022, PALEOCEANOGR PALEOCL, V37, DOI 10.1029/2021PA004236
   Frölicher TL, 2016, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V30, P1224, DOI 10.1002/2015GB005338
   Gogarten S., 2020, SeqVarTools: tools for variant data
   Guisan A., 2017, Habitat Suitability and Distribution Models: With Applications in R
   Guo BC, 2015, BMC BIOL, V13, DOI 10.1186/s12915-015-0130-8
   Hamada FN, 2008, NATURE, V454, P217, DOI 10.1038/nature07001
   HAMANO T, 1987, Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, V53, P23
   Hanson JO, 2021, CONSERV BIOL, V35, P634, DOI 10.1111/cobi.13602
   Hewitt G, 2000, NATURE, V405, P907, DOI 10.1038/35016000
   Hewitt GM, 2001, MOL ECOL, V10, P537, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01202.x
   Hewitt GM, 2011, GENETICA, V139, P617, DOI 10.1007/s10709-011-9547-3
   Hirzel AH, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V199, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.017
   Hohenlohe PA, 2021, MOL ECOL, V30, P62, DOI 10.1111/mec.15720
   Hu ZM, 2021, MOL ECOL, V30, P3840, DOI 10.1111/mec.15996
   Jeffery NW, 2017, ROY SOC OPEN SCI, V4, DOI 10.1098/rsos.171394
   Jordan R, 2017, MOL ECOL, V26, P6002, DOI 10.1111/mec.14341
   Kass JM, 2021, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V12, P1602, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.13628
   Kim S, 2017, OCEAN SCI J, V52, P257, DOI 10.1007/s12601-017-0027-2
   Kitamura A, 2001, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V172, P81, DOI 10.1016/S0031-0182(01)00272-3
   Kitamura A, 2006, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V236, P355, DOI 10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.11.015
   Kodama K., 2003, Bulletin of the Kanagawa Prefectural Fisheries Research Institute, V8, P71
   Kodama K, 2006, FISHERIES SCI, V72, P568, DOI 10.1111/j.1444-2906.2006.01185.x
   Komai T., 1927, Memoirs of the College of Science Kyoto Imperial University Ser B, VNo.3, P307
   Kramer-Schadt S, 2013, DIVERS DISTRIB, V19, P1366, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12096
   Lee Y, 2021, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V157, DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2020.107037
   Li H, 2009, BIOINFORMATICS, V25, P1754, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
   Li MK, 2020, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106928
   Li Y, 2017, FRONT PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.02136
   Li YL, 2018, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V18, P176, DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12719
   Liggins L., 2020, Population Genomics: Marine Organisms, P171
   Liu JY, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI [10.1371/journal.pone.0064143, 10.1371/journal.pone.0050719, 10.1371/journal.pone.0057473]
   Lou FR, 2021, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS D, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.cbd.2021.100828
   Lou FR, 2019, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS D, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.cbd.2019.100615
   Lou FR, 2019, ANIMALS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/ani9070399
   Manning R. B., 1971, Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, VNo. 71, P1
   Matsuzaki KM, 2018, PROG EARTH PLANET SC, V5, DOI 10.1186/s40645-018-0204-7
   Mounier N, 2002, CELL STRESS CHAPERON, V7, P167, DOI 10.1379/1466-1268(2002)007<0167:ACASHS>2.0.CO;2
   Naziroglu M, 2017, FRONT PHYSIOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fphys.2017.01040
   Ni G, 2017, MOL ECOL, V26, P4591, DOI 10.1111/mec.14235
   Oba T, 2006, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V53, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.05.002
   Paradis E, 2019, BIOINFORMATICS, V35, P526, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633
   Parmesan C, 2003, NATURE, V421, P37, DOI 10.1038/nature01286
   Petit RJ, 2003, SCIENCE, V300, P1563, DOI 10.1126/science.1083264
   Pigliucci M, 1996, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V11, P168, DOI 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10008-2
   Pratt EAL, 2022, MOL ECOL, V31, P2223, DOI 10.1111/mec.16389
   Purcell S, 2007, AM J HUM GENET, V81, P559, DOI 10.1086/519795
   Razgour O, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P10418, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1820663116
   Reisinger A, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1371
   Rellstab C, 2021, EVOL APPL, V14, P1202, DOI 10.1111/eva.13205
   Rellstab C, 2015, MOL ECOL, V24, P4348, DOI 10.1111/mec.13322
   Rochette NC, 2019, MOL ECOL, V28, P4737, DOI 10.1111/mec.15253
   Roschanski AM, 2016, MOL ECOL, V25, P776, DOI 10.1111/mec.13516
   Rose A, 2005, BMC EVOL BIOL, V5, DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-5-66
   Rougemont Q, 2018, EVOLUTION, V72, P1261, DOI 10.1111/evo.13486
   Rougeux C, 2017, GENOME BIOL EVOL, V9, P2057, DOI 10.1093/gbe/evx150
   Sandoval-Castillo J, 2020, J BIOGEOGR, V47, P1599, DOI 10.1111/jbi.13865
   Sandoval-Castillo J, 2018, MOL ECOL, V27, P1603, DOI 10.1111/mec.14526
   Sanford E, 2011, ANNU REV MAR SCI, V3, P509, DOI 10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142756
   Sbrocco E. J., 2013, Ecology, V94, DOI DOI 10.1890/12-1358.1
   Schmidt PS, 2008, ECOLOGY, V89, pS91, DOI 10.1890/07-1162.1
   Shen KN, 2011, BMC EVOL BIOL, V11, DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-83
   Silliman K, 2021, BMC ECOL EVOL, V21, DOI 10.1186/s12862-021-01836-3
   Stelkens RB, 2014, EVOL APPL, V7, P1209, DOI 10.1111/eva.12214
   Stirling C, 2010, BMC HEALTH SERV RES, V10, DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-10-122
   Stocker TF, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1, DOI 10.1017/cbo9781107415324
   TADA R, 1994, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V108, P487, DOI 10.1016/0031-0182(94)90248-8
   Team RC, 2021, R LANGUAGE ENV STAT
   Teske PR, 2019, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V286, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2018.2023
   Wang J, 2015, BMC EVOL BIOL, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12862-015-0387-0
   Wang PX, 2014, MAR GEOL, V352, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.margeo.2014.03.003
   Wang PX, 1999, MAR GEOL, V156, P5, DOI 10.1016/S0025-3227(98)00172-8
   Welch JJ, 2014, MOL ECOL, V23, P3935, DOI 10.1111/mec.12859
   Wellenreuther M, 2010, EVOLUTION, V64, P242, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00815.x
   Xu H., 2021, Fish. Sci., V244, DOI [10.16378/j.cnki.1003-1111.20128, DOI 10.16378/J.CNKI.1003-1111.20128]
   Yeon Inja, 2011, [JOUNAL OF FISHERIES AND MARINE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 수산해양교육연구], V23, P763
   Young MD, 2010, GENOME BIOL, V11, DOI 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14
   Zhang LW, 2023, INT J MOL SCI, V24, DOI 10.3390/ijms241511936
   Zhang Nian-Guo, 2019, Chinese Journal of Zoology, V54, P425, DOI 10.13859/j.cjz.201903012
   Zhang XX, 2019, BMC EVOL BIOL, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12862-019-1489-x
   Zhang ZX, 2021, DIVERS DISTRIB, V27, P684, DOI 10.1111/ddi.13225
   Zhang ZX, 2020, MAR ENVIRON RES, V159, DOI 10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104993
NR 113
TC 3
Z9 5
U1 3
U2 19
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0048-9697
EI 1879-1026
J9 SCI TOTAL ENVIRON
JI Sci. Total Environ.
PD MAR 20
PY 2024
VL 917
AR 170244
DI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170244
EA FEB 2024
PG 13
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA KF1Z1
UT WOS:001178463600001
PM 38278258
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Niu, JY
   Wu, JY
   Qin, WM
   Wang, LC
   Yang, C
   Zhang, M
   Zhang, YJ
   Qi, QH
AF Niu, Jiayun
   Wu, Jinyang
   Qin, Wenmin
   Wang, Lunche
   Yang, Chao
   Zhang, Ming
   Zhang, Yujie
   Qi, Qinghai
TI Projection of future carbon benefits by photovoltaic power potential in
   China using CMIP6 statistical downscaling data
SO ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
LA English
DT Article
DE photovoltaic power potential; carbon benefits; CMIP6; China; statistical
   downscaling
ID CLIMATE; MODELS; PRICE
AB Solar photovoltaic (PV) systems is an affordable solution that significantly contribute to climate adaptation and resilience, energy security and greenhouse gas abatement with respect to fossil fuel electricity generation. Currently, available studies on the benefits of PV power generation only consider the electricity consumption and do not account for the possible future benefits from carbon trading under the combined impacts of pollution emissions and socio-economic. In this study, the downscaling and bias correction were applied to the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) multi-model mean data based on the historical data from the China Meteorological Administration (CMA) stations. The corrected measurements of meteorology were used to explore the PV power potential and the environmental and economic benefits offset by solar power generation under SSP126, SSP245 and SSP585 in China during 2023-2100. We found that the annual mean PV power potential across mainland China ranged from 1 to 37 Wm(-2) and demonstrated a decreasing trend in the Northwest China and an increasing trend in the Southeast China. Compared to thermal power generation, electricity from solar energy will counteract the total emissions of annual mean 139.54 x 10(5) t CO2, 1702 t SO2, 2562 t NO (X) and 3710 t dust in China in SSP126 scenario. The results of variable importance assessment showed that the West Texas Intermediate crude oil price (47.77%), coal price (41.76%), natural gas price (6.65%) and gross domestic product (2.44%) contribute the most to the carbon emissions allowances (CEAs) price. Against a 'carbon peak' background in China, the CEA price will reach 80 CNY/t CO2 by 2030 in China, with the carbon trading value potential ranging from 20 billion to 200 billion CNY of each pixel (10 km x 10 km) by 2030. This study would have important implications for the environmental construction and future investment and construction of PV systems in China.
C1 [Niu, Jiayun; Wu, Jinyang; Qin, Wenmin; Wang, Lunche; Zhang, Ming; Zhang, Yujie; Qi, Qinghai] China Univ Geosci, Hubei Key Lab Reg Ecol & Environm Change, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China.
   [Yang, Chao] Minist Ecol Environm, Yangtze River Basin Ecol Environm Supervis & Adm B, Ecol Environm Monitoring & Sci Res Ctr, Wuhan 430010, Peoples R China.
   [Yang, Chao] Chinese Acad Sci, Innovat Acad Precis Measurement Sci & Technol, Key Lab Environm & Disaster Monitoring & Evaluat H, Wuhan 430077, Peoples R China.
C3 China University of Geosciences; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Innovation
   Academy for Precision Measurement Science & Technology, CAS
RP Qin, WM (corresponding author), China Univ Geosci, Hubei Key Lab Reg Ecol & Environm Change, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China.
EM qinwenmin@whu.edu.cn
RI zhang, yujie/JAA-9367-2023; Wang, Lili/C-9995-2015
OI Qi, Qinghai/0009-0007-1309-4965
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [42001016]; Hubei
   Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2022CFB335]; Natural
   Science Foundation of Henan Province, China [222300420277]
FX We thank the World Climate Research Program, which coordinated and
   facilitated CMIP6 through its Coupled Modelling Working Group. The CMIP6
   data are accessed at https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/cmip6/. We thank
   the China Meteorological Administration for providing the meteorological
   and radiation data (http://cdc.cma.gov.cn/home.do/). The authors
   gratefully acknowledge ECMWF for their effort in making the data
   available. This work is supported by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (No. 42001016), Hubei Provincial Natural Science
   Foundation of China (Grant No. 2022CFB335) and the Natural Science
   Foundation of Henan Province, China (No. 222300420277).
CR Agbor ME, 2023, CLEAN ENG TECHNOL, V13, DOI 10.1016/j.clet.2023.100630
   Batten JA, 2021, ENERG ECON, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105016
   CEC, 2019, ANN DEV REP CHIN POW
   CEC, 2022, Annual development report of China's power industry
   Chen X, 2023, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2022.113109
   Copernicus Climate Change Service, 2024, ECMWR
   Crook JA, 2011, ENERG ENVIRON SCI, V4, P3101, DOI 10.1039/c1ee01495a
   Danso DK, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5a67
   Doelman JC, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V48, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.014
   Dutta R, 2022, RENEW ENERG, V188, P819, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2022.02.023
   El Amri A., 2020, FINANCIAL MARKETS I, V4, P31, DOI 10.21272/fmir.4(4).31-44.2020
   Ellis J, 2020, CLIM POLICY, V20, P1070, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2020.1805291
   Escap U., 2021, Shaping a sustainable energy future in Asia and the Pacific: a greener, more resilient and inclusive energy system
   European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), 2018, document CY45r1
   Eyring V, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P1937, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
   Forster P, 2023, ENVIRON RES-CLIM, V2, DOI 10.1088/2752-5295/acc67f
   Green JF, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9
   Gumus V, 2022, J EARTH SYST SCI, V131, DOI 10.1007/s12040-021-01770-4
   He YY, 2023, NATL SCI REV, V10, DOI 10.1093/nsr/nwac242
   Hersbach H, 2020, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V146, P1999, DOI 10.1002/qj.3803
   Jäger-Waldau A, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109836
   Jiang CH, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12040663
   Junaedi D., 2022, MANBIZ J MANAGE BUS, V1, P1, DOI [10.47467/manbiz.v1i1.1627, DOI 10.47467/MANBIZ.V1I1.1627]
   Karstensen J, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa94a3
   Li ZP, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V723, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137982
   Li ZY, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V113, P547, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05314-x
   Lin BQ, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V654, P525, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.106
   Liu LB, 2022, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V180, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106155
   Liu T, 2023, ENERG ECON, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106626
   Liu Y, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V262, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121376
   Lu N, 2022, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V49, DOI 10.1029/2022GL100068
   Lynn J, 2021, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V169, DOI 10.1007/s10584-021-03233-7
   Niu JY, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V858, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159776
   O'Neill BC, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P387, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2
   Qin WM, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V81, P579, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.037
   Qiu TZ, 2022, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111900
   Song XH, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14138002
   Su RX, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12166662
   van Vuuren DP, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.008
   Wafa N R T, 2022, INT J CURR EC BUS VE, V2, P1
   Wen FH, 2020, ENERG ECON, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104850
   Wild M, 2015, SOL ENERGY, V116, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2015.03.039
   Wolske KS, 2017, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V25, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.023
   World Climate Research Program WCRP., 2016, CMIP6
   Wu JY, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14153695
   Xie J., 2023, IDENTIFYING OPTIMAL, DOI [10.5089/9798400235177.001, DOI 10.5089/9798400235177.001]
   Xu HQ, 2022, CARBON NEUTRALITY, V1, DOI 10.1007/s43979-022-00014-8
   Yang JN, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aabe99
   Yang L., 2018, Glob. Energy Interconnect, V1, P452, DOI [10.14171/j.2096-5117.gei.2018.04.005, DOI 10.14171/J.2096-5117.GEI.2018.04.005]
   You QL, 2021, CLIM DYNAM, V57, P17, DOI 10.1007/s00382-021-05691-2
   Yu BW, 2022, J CONTEMP CHINA, V31, P558, DOI 10.1080/10670564.2021.1985831
   Zhang QB, 2023, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V50, DOI 10.1029/2022GL100888
   Zhang S, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI [10.1038/S41467-021-27671-0, 10.1038/s41467-021-27671-0]
   Zhao XH, 2020, APPL ENERG, V280
   Zhu BZ, 2019, ENERG ECON, V78, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.11.007
NR 55
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 13
U2 71
PU IOP Publishing Ltd
PI BRISTOL
PA TEMPLE CIRCUS, TEMPLE WAY, BRISTOL BS1 6BE, ENGLAND
SN 1748-9326
J9 ENVIRON RES LETT
JI Environ. Res. Lett.
PD SEP 1
PY 2023
VL 18
IS 9
AR 094013
DI 10.1088/1748-9326/acec03
PG 12
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA P0VE8
UT WOS:001047895200001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Elbeltagi, A
   Srivastava, A
   Al-Saeedi, AH
   Raza, A
   Abd-Elaty, I
   El-Rawy, M
AF Elbeltagi, Ahmed
   Srivastava, Aman
   Al-Saeedi, Abdullah Hassan
   Raza, Ali
   Abd-Elaty, Ismail
   El-Rawy, Mustafa
TI Forecasting Long-Series Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Based on Best
   Subset Regression and Machine Learning in Egypt
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE reference evapotranspiration; machine learning algorithms; linear
   regression; random subspace; additive regression; reduced error pruning
   tree; water resources management; climate-resilient pathways
ID RANDOM SUBSPACE METHOD; NEURAL-NETWORK; PREDICTION; MODELS; EQUATIONS;
   INFERENCE; REPTREE; SVM; ANN
AB The estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo), a crucial step in the hydrologic cycle, is essential for system design and management, including the balancing, planning, and scheduling of agricultural water supply and water resources. When climates vary from arid to semi-arid, and there are problems with a lack of meteorological data and a lack of future information on ETo, as is the case in Egypt, it is more important to estimate ETo precisely. To address this, the current study aimed to model ETo for Egypt's most important agricultural governorates (Al Buhayrah, Alexandria, Ismailiyah, and Minufiyah) using four machine learning (ML) algorithms: linear regression (LR), random subspace (RSS), additive regression (AR), and reduced error pruning tree (REPTree). The Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) was used to gather daily climate data variables from 1979 to 2014. The datasets were split into two sections: the training phase, i.e., 1979-2006, and the testing phase, i.e., 2007-2014. Maximum temperature (T-max), minimum temperature (T-min), and solar radiation (SR) were found to be the three input variables that had the most influence on the outcome of subset regression and sensitivity analysis. A comparative analysis of ML models revealed that REPTree outperformed competitors by achieving the best values for various performance matrices during the training and testing phases. The study's novelty lies in the use of REPTree to estimate and predict ETo, as this algorithm has not been commonly used for this purpose. Given the sparse attempts to use this model for such research, the remarkable accuracy of the REPTree model in predicting ETo highlighted the rarity of this study. In order to combat the effects of aridity through better water resource management, the study also cautions Egypt's authorities to concentrate their policymaking on climate adaptation.
C1 [Elbeltagi, Ahmed] Mansoura Univ, Fac Agr, Agr Engn Dept, Mansoura 35516, Egypt.
   [Srivastava, Aman] Indian Inst Technol IIT Kharagpur, Dept Civil Engn, Kharagpur 721302, West Bengal, India.
   [Al-Saeedi, Abdullah Hassan] King Faisal Univ, Coll Agr & Food Sci, Dept Environm & Nat Resources, Al Hasa 31982, Saudi Arabia.
   [Raza, Ali] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Agr Engn, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China.
   [Abd-Elaty, Ismail] Zagazig Univ, Fac Engn, Water & Water Struct Engn Dept, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.
   [El-Rawy, Mustafa] Minia Univ, Fac Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Al Minya 61111, Egypt.
   [El-Rawy, Mustafa] Shaqra Univ, Coll Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Dawadmi 11911, Saudi Arabia.
C3 Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Mansoura University; Indian Institute of
   Technology System (IIT System); Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) -
   Kharagpur; King Faisal University; Jiangsu University; Egyptian
   Knowledge Bank (EKB); Zagazig University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB);
   Minia University; Shaqra University
RP Elbeltagi, A (corresponding author), Mansoura Univ, Fac Agr, Agr Engn Dept, Mansoura 35516, Egypt.; El-Rawy, M (corresponding author), Minia Univ, Fac Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Al Minya 61111, Egypt.; El-Rawy, M (corresponding author), Shaqra Univ, Coll Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Dawadmi 11911, Saudi Arabia.
EM ahmedelbeltagy81@mans.edu.eg; mustafa.elrawy@mu.edu.eg
RI Raza, Ali/IZD-7266-2023; Abd-Elaty, Ismail/AAI-9193-2021; Srivastava,
   Aman/HPH-0177-2023; El-Rawy, Mustafa/G-6605-2018; Elbeltagi,
   Ahmed/P-4614-2018
OI Elbeltagi, Ahmed/0000-0002-5506-9502; El-Rawy,
   Mustafa/0000-0001-7086-0004; Raza, Ali/0000-0001-9207-5779
FU Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Faisal University, KSA
   [GRANT2470]
FX This research received no external funding.
CR Abdullah SS, 2015, J HYDROL, V527, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.073
   Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
   Bellido-Jiménez JA, 2021, AGR WATER MANAGE, V245, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106558
   Arnell NW, 2016, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V134, P387, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1084-5
   Ayaz A, 2021, AIMS GEOSCI, V7, P268, DOI 10.3934/geosci.2021016
   Bai Y, 2021, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V298, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108308
   Bharti B, 2017, HYDROL RES, V48, P1489, DOI 10.2166/nh.2017.153
   Breiman L, 2001, MACH LEARN, V45, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1010933404324
   CAPMAS (Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics), 2022, EG FIG POP
   Dhillon R, 2019, PRECIS AGRIC, V20, P723, DOI 10.1007/s11119-018-9607-0
   Elbeltagi A, 2022, APPL WATER SCI, V12, DOI 10.1007/s13201-022-01667-7
   Fan JL, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V263, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.08.019
   Fang W, 2018, J HYDROL, V561, P764, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.04.038
   Feng Y, 2017, AGR WATER MANAGE, V193, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.08.003
   Feng Y, 2017, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V136, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2017.01.027
   Ferreira LB, 2020, AGR WATER MANAGE, V234, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106113
   Fu JC, 2019, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V33, P4491, DOI 10.1007/s11269-019-02357-x
   Gocic M, 2016, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V127, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2016.05.017
   Granata F, 2019, AGR WATER MANAGE, V217, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.015
   Guo XH, 2011, HYDROL RES, V42, P268, DOI 10.2166/nh.2011.072
   Hastie T., 1986, Stat. Sci., V1, DOI [10.1214/ss/1177013604, DOI 10.1214/SS/1177013604, DOI 10.1214/SS/1177013609]
   Ho TK, 1998, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V20, P832, DOI 10.1109/34.709601
   Hothorn T, 2008, BIOMETRICAL J, V50, P346, DOI 10.1002/bimj.200810425
   Huang GM, 2019, J HYDROL, V574, P1029, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.085
   Joseph K.S., 2012, AUST J BASIC APPL SC, V6, P312
   Jun-Fang Z.H.A.O., 2010, J AGROMETEOROL, V31, P200
   Khadke L, 2021, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V7, P2809, DOI 10.1007/s40808-020-01073-5
   Kisi O, 2021, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V145, P639, DOI 10.1007/s00704-021-03645-6
   Kumar ARS, 2012, J HYDROL ENG, V17, P394, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000445
   Kushwaha NL, 2021, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/atmos12121654
   Laanaya F, 2017, HYDROLOG SCI J, V62, P1078, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2016.1246799
   Liu MX, 2021, SPAT STAT-NETH, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.spasta.2020.100461
   Lu G, 2010, HYDROLOGICAL CYCLE Q
   Mattar MA, 2018, AGR WATER MANAGE, V198, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.12.017
   Mehdizadeh S, 2017, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V139, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2017.05.002
   Meza I, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P695, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-695-2020
   Nourani V, 2019, J HYDROL, V577, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123958
   Nouri H, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P380, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2014.900092
   PARK JY, 1989, ECONOMET THEOR, V5, P95, DOI 10.1017/S0266466600012287
   Pérez-Domínguez L, 2022, MATHEMATICS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/math10101645
   QUINLAN JR, 1987, INT J MAN MACH STUD, V27, P221, DOI 10.1016/S0020-7373(87)80053-6
   Ravikumar P, 2009, J R STAT SOC B, V71, P1009, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2009.00718.x
   Raza A, 2021, POL J ENVIRON STUD, V30, P5413, DOI 10.15244/pjoes/136348
   Raza A, 2021, FRESEN ENVIRON BULL, V30, P7490
   Raza A, 2020, PURE APPL GEOPHYS, V177, P4479, DOI 10.1007/s00024-020-02473-5
   Raza A, 2020, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V139, P1459, DOI 10.1007/s00704-019-03007-3
   Saggi MK, 2019, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V156, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2018.11.031
   Salam R, 2020, J HYDROL, V590, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125241
   Sattari MT, 2020, MATHEMATICS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/math8060972
   Sazib N, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10081265
   Skurichina M, 2002, PATTERN ANAL APPL, V5, P121, DOI 10.1007/s100440200011
   Summit Sherma RDG, 2016, INT J ENG RES, V5, P184, DOI 10.17950/ijer/v5i1/043
   Tabari H, 2013, IRRIGATION SCI, V31, P575, DOI 10.1007/s00271-012-0332-6
   Tang DH, 2018, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V152, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2018.07.029
   Tikhamarine Y, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P30001, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-08792-3
   Torres AF, 2011, AGR WATER MANAGE, V98, P553, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.10.012
   Traore S, 2016, AGR WATER MANAGE, V163, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.10.009
   Valipour M, 2019, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/atmos10060311
   Nhu VH, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9080479
   Walls S, 2020, NEURAL COMPUT APPL, V32, P14001, DOI 10.1007/s00521-020-04800-2
   Witten I. H., 2002, Acm Sigmod Record, V31, P76, DOI [DOI 10.1145/507338.507355, 10.1145/507338.507355]
   Xia CY, 2022, J INTELL MANUF, V33, P1467, DOI 10.1007/s10845-020-01725-4
   Yaman MA, 2018, SYMMETRY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/sym10110651
NR 63
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 2
U2 5
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD MAR
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 6
AR 1149
DI 10.3390/w15061149
PG 17
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA C0FC0
UT WOS:000958771600001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Galliart, M
   Sabates, S
   Tetreault, H
   DeLaCruz, A
   Bryant, J
   Alsdurf, J
   Knapp, M
   Bello, NM
   Baer, SG
   Maricle, BR
   Gibson, DJ
   Poland, J
   St Amand, P
   Unruh, N
   Parrish, O
   Johnson, L
AF Galliart, Matthew
   Sabates, Sofia
   Tetreault, Hannah
   DeLaCruz, Angel
   Bryant, Johnny
   Alsdurf, Jake
   Knapp, Mary
   Bello, Nora M.
   Baer, Sara G.
   Maricle, Brian R.
   Gibson, David J.
   Poland, Jesse
   St Amand, Paul
   Unruh, Natalie
   Parrish, Olivia
   Johnson, Loretta
TI Adaptive genetic potential and plasticity of trait variation in the
   foundation prairie grass<i>Andropogon gerardii</i>across the US Great
   Plains' climate gradient: Implications for climate change and
   restoration
SO EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE drought; ecotypic variation; genetic differentiation; genome-environment
   interaction; Great Plains grasslands; local adaptation; phenotypic
   variation; precipitation; reciprocal gardens
ID LOCAL ADAPTATION; EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE; ECOTYPIC VARIATION;
   ABOVEGROUND PRODUCTIVITY; ENVIRONMENTAL-INFLUENCES;
   ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA; GENOMIC VARIATION; EXTREME DROUGHT; ALPINE PLANT;
   DOMINANT
AB Plant response to climate depends on a species' adaptive potential. To address this, we used reciprocal gardens to detect genetic and environmental plasticity effects on phenotypic variation and combined with genetic analyses. Four reciprocal garden sites were planted with three regional ecotypes ofAndropogon gerardii,a dominant Great Plains prairie grass, using dry, mesic, and wet ecotypes originating from western KS to Illinois that span 500-1,200 mm rainfall/year. We aimed to answer: (a) What is the relative role of genetic constraints and phenotypic plasticity in controlling phenotypes? (b) When planted in the homesite, is there a trait syndrome for each ecotype? (c) How are genotypes and phenotypes structured by climate? and (d) What are implications of these results for response to climate change and use of ecotypes for restoration? Surprisingly, we did not detect consistent local adaptation. Rather, we detected co-gradient variation primarily for most vegetative responses. All ecotypes were stunted in western KS. Eastward, the wet ecotype was increasingly robust relative to other ecotypes. In contrast, fitness showed evidence for local adaptation in wet and dry ecotypes with wet and mesic ecotypes producing little seed in western KS. Earlier flowering time in the dry ecotype suggests adaptation to end of season drought. Considering ecotype traits in homesite, the dry ecotype was characterized by reduced canopy area and diameter, short plants, and low vegetative biomass and putatively adapted to water limitation. The wet ecotype was robust, tall with high biomass, and wide leaves putatively adapted for the highly competitive, light-limited Eastern Great Plains. Ecotype differentiation was supported by random forest classification and PCA. We detected genetic differentiation and outlier genes associated with primarily precipitation. We identified candidate gene GA1 for which allele frequency associated with plant height. Sourcing of climate adapted ecotypes should be considered for restoration.
C1 [Galliart, Matthew; Sabates, Sofia; Tetreault, Hannah; DeLaCruz, Angel; Bryant, Johnny; Alsdurf, Jake; Unruh, Natalie; Parrish, Olivia; Johnson, Loretta] Kansas State Univ, Biol, Ackert Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA.
   [Knapp, Mary] Kansas State Univ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA.
   [Bello, Nora M.] Kansas State Univ, Stat, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA.
   [Baer, Sara G.] Univ Kansas, Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA.
   [Maricle, Brian R.] Ft Hays State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Hays, KS 67601 USA.
   [Gibson, David J.] Southern Illinois Univ, Plant Biol & Ctr Ecol, Carbondale, IL USA.
   [Poland, Jesse] Kansas State Univ, Plant Pathol, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA.
   [St Amand, Paul] USDA ARS, Hard Winter Wheat Genet Res Unit, Manhattan, KS USA.
C3 Kansas State University; Kansas State University; Kansas State
   University; University of Kansas; Southern Illinois University System;
   Southern Illinois University; Kansas State University; United States
   Department of Agriculture (USDA)
RP Johnson, L (corresponding author), Kansas State Univ, Biol, Ackert Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA.
EM Johnson@ksu.edu
RI Gibson, David/HTQ-3690-2023; Poland, Jesse/HKO-1284-2023
OI Poland, Jesse/0000-0002-7856-1399
FU U.S. Department of Agriculture [2008-35100-04545]; National Science
   Foundation [GGVP004169.NS9630.3145.50010]; Kansas Native Plant Society;
   Grasslands Heritage Foundation; Sigma Xi; NIFA [2008-35100-04545,
   583293] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
FX U.S. Department of Agriculture, Grant/Award Number: 2008-35100-04545;
   National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship, Grant/Award
   Number: GGVP004169.NS9630.3145.50010; Kansas Native Plant Society;
   Grasslands Heritage Foundation; Sigma Xi
CR Ackerly DD, 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P979, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0979:TEOPET]2.0.CO;2
   Aitken SN, 2013, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V44, P367, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135747
   Altman N, 2017, NAT METHODS, V14, P933, DOI 10.1038/nmeth.4438
   Anderson JT, 2015, EVOLUTION, V69, P2249, DOI 10.1111/evo.12745
   Anderson JT, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P1689, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12770
   Aspinwall MJ, 2013, NEW PHYTOL, V199, P966, DOI 10.1111/nph.12341
   Avolio ML, 2013, ECOLOGY, V94, P953, DOI 10.1890/12-1119.1
   AXELROD DI, 1985, BOT REV, V51, P163, DOI 10.1007/BF02861083
   Baer SG., 2019, Restoring grassland in the context of climate change. Grasslands and climate change, P310
   Bailey R.G., 1998, Ecoregions: The Ecosystem Geography of the Oceans and Continents
   Bischoff A, 2006, J ECOL, V94, P1130, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01174.x
   BLOOM AJ, 1985, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V16, P363, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.002051
   Bradbury PJ, 2007, BIOINFORMATICS, V23, P2633, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308
   Bradshaw A.D., 1984, PERSPECTIVES PLANT P, P213
   Bragg JG, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V207, P953, DOI 10.1111/nph.13410
   Breiman L., 2001, Machine Learning, V45, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Byars SG, 2007, EVOLUTION, V61, P2925, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00248.x
   Caudle KL, 2014, PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V52, P511, DOI 10.1007/s11099-014-0057-2
   CHAPIN FS, 1981, ECOLOGY, V62, P1000, DOI 10.2307/1936999
   CHAPIN FS, 1991, BIOSCIENCE, V41, P29, DOI 10.2307/1311538
   CHAPIN FS, 1993, AM NAT, V142, pS78, DOI 10.1086/285524
   Christmas MJ, 2016, MOL ECOL, V25, P4216, DOI 10.1111/mec.13750
   Clausen J., 1940, ARNEGIE I WASHINGTON, V520
   Conover DO, 2009, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1168, P100, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04575.x
   CONOVER DO, 1995, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V10, P248, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89081-3
   Cook BI, 2015, SCI ADV, V1, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1400082
   Craine JM, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P3401, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1118438109
   Crispo E, 2008, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V21, P1460, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01592.x
   De Frenne P, 2013, J ECOL, V101, P784, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12074
   De Kort H, 2014, MOL ECOL, V23, P4709, DOI 10.1111/mec.12813
   de Villemereuil P, 2016, HEREDITY, V116, P249, DOI 10.1038/hdy.2015.93
   de Villemereuil P, 2015, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V6, P1248, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12418
   Des Roches S, 2018, NAT ECOL EVOL, V2, P57, DOI 10.1038/s41559-017-0402-5
   Dickman EE, 2019, EVOL APPL, V12, P1569, DOI 10.1111/eva.12803
   Eckhart VM, 2004, EVOLUTION, V58, P59, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01573.x
   Elshire RJ, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019379
   Ensing DJ, 2019, NEW PHYTOL, V224, P1184, DOI 10.1111/nph.16009
   Epstein HE, 1997, ECOLOGY, V78, P2628, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2628:EOTAST]2.0.CO;2
   Epstein HE, 1996, J VEG SCI, V7, P777, DOI 10.2307/3236456
   Etterson JR, 2004, EVOLUTION, V58, P1446, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01726.x
   Exposito-Alonso M, 2018, NAT ECOL EVOL, V2, P352, DOI 10.1038/s41559-017-0423-0
   Falush D, 2007, MOL ECOL NOTES, V7, P574, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01758.x
   Fischer MC, 2013, MOL ECOL, V22, P5594, DOI 10.1111/mec.12521
   Foll M, 2008, GENETICS, V180, P977, DOI 10.1534/genetics.108.092221
   Gallaher TJ, 2019, EVOLUTION, V73, P927, DOI 10.1111/evo.13722
   Galliart M, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P850, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14534
   Gibson AL, 2016, EVOL APPL, V9, P1219, DOI 10.1111/eva.12379
   Gibson D.J., 2009, Grasses and grassland ecology, P1
   Gibson DJ, 2016, GRASSL SCI, V62, P233, DOI 10.1111/grs.12131
   Gonzalo-Turpin H, 2009, J ECOL, V97, P742, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01509.x
   Grassein F, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P1452, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12445
   Gray MM, 2014, MOL ECOL, V23, P6011, DOI 10.1111/mec.12993
   Günther T, 2013, GENETICS, V195, P205, DOI 10.1534/genetics.113.152462
   Hamann E, 2018, EVOLUTION, V72, P2682, DOI 10.1111/evo.13631
   Hancock AM, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P83, DOI 10.1126/science.1209244
   Harper J. L., 1977, Population biology of plants.
   HARPER JL, 1970, J ECOL, V58, P681, DOI 10.2307/2258529
   Hedden P, 2012, BIOCHEM J, V444, P11, DOI 10.1042/BJ20120245
   Hoekstra JM, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P23, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00686.x
   Hoover DL, 2014, ECOLOGY, V95, P2646, DOI 10.1890/13-2186.1
   Hufford KM, 2003, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V18, P147, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00002-8
   IPCC Climate change, 2017, PHYS SCI BASIS
   Johnson LC, 2015, EVOL APPL, V8, P705, DOI 10.1111/eva.12281
   Jombart T, 2008, BIOINFORMATICS, V24, P1403, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129
   Kettenring KM, 2014, J APPL ECOL, V51, P339, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12202
   Knapp AK, 2001, SCIENCE, V291, P481, DOI 10.1126/science.291.5503.481
   Knapp AK, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P19, DOI 10.1007/s100210000057
   Knapp AK., 1998, Grassland Dynamics: Long-Term Ecological Research in Tallgrass Prairie, P193
   Knapp AK, 2008, BIOSCIENCE, V58, P811, DOI 10.1641/B580908
   Kramer DL, 2018, FLORA, V246, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.flora.2018.07.005
   Kuchler A.W., 1965, SOIL SCI, V99, P365, DOI [10.1097/00010694-196505000-00019, DOI 10.1097/00010694-196505000-00019]
   La Pierre KJ, 2011, J ECOL, V99, P1250, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01844.x
   Lasky JR, 2018, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V18, P91, DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12714
   Lasky JR, 2012, MOL ECOL, V21, P5512, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05709.x
   Linhart YB, 1996, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V27, P237, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.237
   Lotterhos KE, 2015, MOL ECOL, V24, P1031, DOI 10.1111/mec.13100
   Lowry DB, 2009, NEW PHYTOL, V183, P776, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02901.x
   Lu F, 2013, PLOS GENET, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003215
   Maricle Brian R., 2017, Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, V120, P1, DOI 10.1660/062.120.0102
   McGraw JB, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P3827, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12991
   McKay JK, 2005, RESTOR ECOL, V13, P432, DOI 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00058.x
   MCMILLAN C, 1965, AM J BOT, V52, P55, DOI 10.2307/2439975
   MCMILLAN C, 1959, ECOL MONOGR, V29, P285, DOI 10.2307/1942132
   Meirmans PG, 2011, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V11, P5, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02927.x
   Mendola ML, 2015, ECOLOGY, V96, P2433, DOI 10.1890/14-1492.1
   Milach SCK, 2002, CROP SCI, V42, P1147, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2002.1147
   Moles AT, 2009, J ECOL, V97, P923, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01526.x
   Narum SR, 2013, MOL ECOL, V22, P2841, DOI 10.1111/mec.12350
   Nicotra AB, 2010, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V15, P684, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.008
   Nosil P, 2012, OX ECOL EV, P1, DOI 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199587100.001.0001
   Oksanen J, 2022, R package version 2.6-2, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412971874.N145
   Olsen JT, 2013, AM J BOT, V100, P1957, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1200628
   Peakall R, 2006, MOL ECOL NOTES, V6, P288, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x
   Peakall R, 2012, BIOINFORMATICS, V28, P2537, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460
   Pickup M, 2012, EVOL APPL, V5, P913, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00284.x
   Pluess AR, 2016, NEW PHYTOL, V210, P589, DOI 10.1111/nph.13809
   Price DL, 2012, CROP SCI, V52, P189, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2011.05.0280
   Ravenscroft CH, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P4165, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12966
   Rellstab C, 2016, MOL ECOL, V25, P5907, DOI 10.1111/mec.13889
   Rellstab C, 2015, MOL ECOL, V24, P4348, DOI 10.1111/mec.13322
   Riordan EC, 2016, AM J BOT, V103, P73, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1500135
   SAMSON F, 1994, BIOSCIENCE, V44, P418, DOI 10.2307/1312365
   SCHMID B, 1985, J ECOL, V73, P819, DOI 10.2307/2260149
   Shaw RG, 2012, NEW PHYTOL, V195, P752, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04230.x
   Smith AB, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P4365, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13666
   Soil Conservation Service (SCS), 1990, SOIL CONS SERV SCS N, V300-0-8
   Sork VL, 2016, EVOL APPL, V9, P291, DOI 10.1111/eva.12316
   Swemmer AM, 2006, INT J PLANT SCI, V167, P1001, DOI 10.1086/505611
   Varvel NA, 2018, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V155, P477, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.07.018
   Weaver J E., 1932, Ecology and Relative Importance of the Dominants of Tall-Grass Ecology and Relative Importance of the Dominants of Tall-Grass Prairie Prairie
   Weber E, 1998, AM J BOT, V85, P1110, DOI 10.2307/2446344
   Weltzin JF, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P941, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0941:ATROTE]2.0.CO;2
   Whitham TG, 2006, NAT REV GENET, V7, P510, DOI 10.1038/nrg1877
   Wilson LR, 2016, ECOSPHERE, V7, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1329
   Wymore AS, 2011, NEW PHYTOL, V191, P19, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03730.x
   Yurkonis KA, 2019, ECOL REV, P218
NR 116
TC 14
Z9 17
U1 3
U2 32
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1752-4571
J9 EVOL APPL
JI Evol. Appl.
PD OCT
PY 2020
VL 13
IS 9
BP 2333
EP 2356
DI 10.1111/eva.13028
EA JUN 2020
PG 24
WC Evolutionary Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Evolutionary Biology
GA NS4EO
UT WOS:000541495700001
PM 33005227
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Jankowski, A
   Wyka, TP
   Zytkowiak, R
   Danusevicius, D
   Oleksyn, J
AF Jankowski, Artur
   Wyka, Tomasz P.
   Zytkowiak, Roma
   Danusevicius, Darius
   Oleksyn, Jacek
TI Does climate-related in situ variability of Scots pine (<i>Pinus
   sylvestris</i> L.) needles have a genetic basis? Evidence from common
   garden experiments
SO TREE PHYSIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE common garden; foliar traits; functional anatomy; genetic variability;
   needle anatomy; plasticity; provenance trial
ID WOOD ANATOMICAL TRAITS; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; LEAF MASS; ECONOMICS
   SPECTRUM; SHOOT GROWTH; AREA LMA; DIFFERENTIATION; ANGIOSPERMS;
   LONGEVITY; COLD
AB The correlations of phenotypic traits with environmental drivers suggest that variability of these traits is a result of natural selection, especially if such trait correlations are based on genetic variability. We hypothesized that in situ correlations of structural needle traits of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L) with minimal winter temperature (T-min) reported previously from a temperate/boreal transect would be conserved when plants are cultivated under common conditions. We tested this hypothesis by analyzing needles from two common gardens located in the temperate zone, one including adult trees and the other juvenile seedlings. The majority of adult needle traits for which correlations with T-min were found in the field turned out to be under environmental influence. In contrast, the majority of traits studied in juvenile needles were correlated with the original T-min suggesting the role of past natural selection in shaping their variability. Juvenile needles thus appeared to be inherently less plastic than adult needles, perhaps reflecting the stronger selective pressure acting during juvenile, as compared with adult, ontogenetic stage. Genetically based cold-climate adaptation in either juvenile or adult needles, or both, involved an increase in leaf mass per area and leaf density, decrease in needle length, reduction in the amount of xylem and phloem, increase in thickness of epidermis, decrease in tracheid diameter and increase in tracheid density, and increase in diameter and volume fraction of resin ducts. We also show that at least some traits, such as transverse xylem and phloem areas and number of fibers, scale with needle length, suggesting that climate-related trait variation may also be mediated by changes in needle length. Moreover, slopes of these allometric relationships may themselves be plastically modified. The phenotypic syndrome typical of needles from cold environments may thus be under environmental, genetic and allometric control.
C1 [Jankowski, Artur; Wyka, Tomasz P.] Adam Mickiewicz Univ, Fac Biol, Inst Expt Biol, Gen Bot Lab, Umultowska 89, PL-61614 Poznan, Poland.
   [Jankowski, Artur; Zytkowiak, Roma; Oleksyn, Jacek] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Dendrol, Parkowa 5, PL-62035 Kornik, Poland.
   [Danusevicius, Darius] Aleksandras Stulginskis Univ, Fac Forest Sci & Ecol, Studentu Str 11, LT-53361 Akademija, Kaunas Reg, Lithuania.
   [Oleksyn, Jacek] Univ Minnesota, Dept Forest Resources, St Paul, MN 55108 USA.
C3 Adam Mickiewicz University; Polish Academy of Sciences; Vytautas Magnus
   University; University of Minnesota System; University of Minnesota Twin
   Cities
RP Jankowski, A (corresponding author), Adam Mickiewicz Univ, Fac Biol, Inst Expt Biol, Gen Bot Lab, Umultowska 89, PL-61614 Poznan, Poland.; Jankowski, A (corresponding author), Polish Acad Sci, Inst Dendrol, Parkowa 5, PL-62035 Kornik, Poland.
EM artjan88@gmail.com
RI Danusevicius, Darius/AAH-5599-2021; Oleksyn, Jacek/AAR-2351-2020
OI Danusevicius, Darius/0000-0002-1196-9293; Zytkowiak,
   Roma/0000-0003-1024-8694; Wyka, Tomasz P./0000-0003-0569-8009; Oleksyn,
   Jacek/0000-0002-6576-3258
FU Polish National Science Center [2011/02/A/NZ9/00108]
FX This study was supported by the Polish National Science Center grant
   2011/02/A/NZ9/00108 awarded to J.O.
CR ABRAMS MD, 1994, TREE PHYSIOL, V14, P833, DOI 10.1093/treephys/14.7-8-9.833
   Albert CH, 2011, PERSPECT PLANT ECOL, V13, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.ppees.2011.04.003
   Androsiuk P, 2011, DENDROBIOLOGY, V65, P3
   Balao F, 2018, PLANT BIOLOGY, V20, P38, DOI 10.1111/plb.12594
   Bischoff A, 2010, OIKOS, V119, P445, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17776.x
   Biswas C., 1997, The gymnosperms
   Boddi S, 2002, FLORA, V197, P10, DOI 10.1078/0367-2530-00008
   Borgman EM, 2014, BOTANY, V92, P805, DOI 10.1139/cjb-2014-0085
   Cavender-Bares J, 2017, TREE PHYSIOL-NETH, V7, P107, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-69099-5_4
   COLEY PD, 1985, SCIENCE, V230, P895, DOI 10.1126/science.230.4728.895
   Cordell S, 1998, OECOLOGIA, V113, P188, DOI 10.1007/s004420050367
   Dobbertin M, 2010, TREE PHYSIOL, V30, P346, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpp123
   Donnelly K, 2016, TREE GENET GENOMES, V12, DOI 10.1007/s11295-016-1000-4
   Falster D., 2006, SMATR STANDARDISED M
   Esteban LG, 2010, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V24, P19, DOI 10.1007/s00468-009-0375-3
   Gleason SM, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V218, P1360, DOI 10.1111/nph.15116
   González-Zurdo P, 2016, TREE PHYSIOL, V36, P273, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpv134
   He NP, 2018, FUNCT ECOL, V32, P10, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12934
   Herman JJ, 2016, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V283, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2016.0988
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   Huang YJ, 2016, J FORESTRY RES, V27, P13, DOI 10.1007/s11676-015-0133-x
   Hultine KR, 2000, OECOLOGIA, V123, P32, DOI 10.1007/s004420050986
   HUTTUNEN S, 1978, Silva Fennica, V12, P1
   Jankowski A, 2017, FUNCT ECOL, V31, P2212, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12946
   JUNTTILA O, 1981, FOREST SCI, V27, P423
   López R, 2008, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V22, P843, DOI 10.1007/s00468-008-0245-4
   Mamayev SA, 1972, FORMY VNUTRIVIDOVOI
   Martín JA, 2010, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V24, P1017, DOI 10.1007/s00468-010-0471-4
   Méndez-Alonzo R, 2012, ECOLOGY, V93, P2397, DOI 10.1890/11-1213.1
   Merilä J, 2014, EVOL APPL, V7, P1, DOI 10.1111/eva.12137
   Moreira X, 2015, TREE PHYSIOL, V35, P112, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpu106
   NERG A, 1994, NEW PHYTOL, V128, P703, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb04034.x
   Niinemets Ü, 2003, ANN FOREST SCI, V60, P195, DOI 10.1051/forest:2003012
   Niinemets Ü, 2001, ECOLOGY, V82, P453, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0453:GSCCOL]2.0.CO;2
   Niinemets Ü, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V205, P79, DOI 10.1111/nph.13001
   Nobis MP, 2012, PLANT ECOL DIVERS, V5, P1, DOI 10.1080/17550874.2012.687501
   NORGREN O, 1994, SCAND J FOREST RES, V9, P165, DOI 10.1080/02827589409382827
   Novikova TN, 2006, RUSS J ECOL+, V37, P90, DOI 10.1134/S1067413606020044
   Ogaya R, 2007, ACTA OECOL, V31, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.actao.2006.07.004
   OLEKSYN J, 1992, NEW PHYTOL, V120, P561, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01806.x
   Oleksyn Jacek, 1998, Silva Fennica, V32, P129
   Olson ME, 2014, ECOL LETT, V17, P988, DOI 10.1111/ele.12302
   Ordoñez JC, 2009, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V18, P137, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00441.x
   Pakharkova NV, 2014, CONTEMP PROBL ECOL+, V7, P84, DOI 10.1134/S1995425514010107
   Pensa M, 2010, PLANT ECOL, V208, P155, DOI 10.1007/s11258-009-9695-z
   Pittermann J, 2003, TREE PHYSIOL, V23, P907, DOI 10.1093/treephys/23.13.907
   Poorter H, 2009, NEW PHYTOL, V182, P565, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02830.x
   Pravdin L. F., 1969, Israel Program for Scientific Translations
   Rademaker H, 2017, PHYS REV E, V95, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.042402
   Read QD, 2014, FUNCT ECOL, V28, P37, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12162
   Reich PB, 1996, TREE PHYSIOL, V16, P643
   Reich PB, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P13703, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1216054110
   Reich PB, 2014, J ECOL, V102, P275, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12211
   Ronellenfitsch H, 2015, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V282, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2014.1863
   RUBY JL, 1976, SILVAE GENET, V25, P169
   SCHOETTLE AW, 1990, TREE PHYSIOL, V7, P209, DOI 10.1093/treephys/7.1-2-3-4.209
   Schreiber SG, 2011, NEW PHYTOL, V190, P150, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03594.x
   Trabucco A., 2009, Global Potential Evapo-Transpiration (Global-PET) and Global Aridity Index (Global-Aridity)
   Villar R, 2013, AM J BOT, V100, P1969, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1200562
   Weiner J, 2004, PERSPECT PLANT ECOL, V6, P207, DOI 10.1078/1433-8319-00083
   Westoby M, 2003, OECOLOGIA, V135, P621, DOI 10.1007/s00442-003-1231-6
   Wisniewski M, 2014, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V99, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.11.011
   WITKOWSKI ETF, 1991, OECOLOGIA, V88, P486, DOI 10.1007/BF00317710
   Wright IJ, 2017, SCIENCE, V357, P917, DOI 10.1126/science.aal4760
   Wyka TP, 2014, DENDROBIOLOGY, V72, P3, DOI 10.12657/denbio.072.001
   Xu YL, 2016, J FORESTRY RES, V27, P41, DOI 10.1007/s11676-015-0153-6
   Zadworny M, 2016, NEW PHYTOL, V212, P389, DOI 10.1111/nph.14048
   Zanne AE, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V218, P1697, DOI 10.1111/nph.15114
   Zanne AE, 2014, NATURE, V506, P89, DOI 10.1038/nature12872
   Zwieniecki MA, 2006, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V29, P803, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01448.x
NR 70
TC 23
Z9 30
U1 1
U2 36
PU OXFORD UNIV PRESS
PI OXFORD
PA GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND
SN 0829-318X
EI 1758-4469
J9 TREE PHYSIOL
JI Tree Physiol.
PD APR
PY 2019
VL 39
IS 4
BP 573
EP 589
DI 10.1093/treephys/tpy145
PG 17
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA JH8XJ
UT WOS:000493051100006
PM 30715504
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Pagliano, L
   Cattarin, G
   Causone, F
   Kindinis, A
AF Pagliano, Lorenzo
   Cattarin, Giulio
   Causone, Francesco
   Kindinis, Andrea
TI Improved methods for the calorimetric determination of the solar factor
   in outdoor test cell facilities
SO ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
LA English
DT Article
DE Test cell; Calorimetric measurement; Measurement accuracy; Measurement
   precision; Measurement procedure; Combined standard uncertainty;
   Standard measurement uncertainty; Total solar energy transmittance;
   Solar factor; g-value; Solar heat gain coefficient; SHGC; Transparent
   building components; Adaptive facades; Lumped-parameters model; Climate
   adaptive building shell (CABS)
ID GENERAL EVALUATION METHOD; OF-THE-ART; VENETIAN BLINDS; CONTROL-SYSTEMS;
   COLLECTORS; MODELS; FACADES
AB Calorimetric methods for the performance assessment of building components have been largely applied in indoor laboratories and under steady-state conditions. Although effects of one or more outdoor weather parameters are sometimes mimicked by means of dynamic schedules, they never fully reproduce the complex interactions of the stochastic processes typical of real climate.
   The present work introduces improved measurement procedures to determine the solar factor under dynamic conditions, applicable to outdoor test cell experiments and which take into account the variation of internal energy in the control volume. An in-depth uncertainty analysis has been conducted in order to highlight the most relevant uncertainty sources and to suggest improvements to the measurement techniques.
   Based on an iterative application of the uncertainty analysis, we developed and optimised two new strategies to extract and measure the solar load entering through a test sample and a new design concept of test cell facility, which allows the configuration to be adapted according to various test objectives. In order to accurately analyse the storage and delay effects of the thermal capacities within the control volume of the calorimeter, lumped-parameter models of three alternative designs (the two proposed strategies and a reference, traditional one) have been developed and coded in Matlab.
   The simulation results suggest that, compared to a traditional solution, the two proposed solutions offer a higher measurement accuracy and measurement precision in the determination of the solar factor. In addition, the results indicate that rapidly variable solar irradiance levels are detrimental to the accuracy level of the solar factor measurement; therefore tests should be carried out under stable clear sky conditions. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Pagliano, Lorenzo; Cattarin, Giulio; Causone, Francesco] Politecn Milan, Dept Energy, End Use Efficiency Res Grp, Via Lambruschini 4, I-20156 Milan, Italy.
   [Cattarin, Giulio; Kindinis, Andrea] Univ Paris Est, Inst Rech Constructibilite, ESTP, F-94230 Cachan, France.
   [Cattarin, Giulio; Kindinis, Andrea] Efficacity, 14-20 Blvd Newton, F-77447 Marne La Vallee 2, France.
C3 Polytechnic University of Milan
RP Pagliano, L (corresponding author), Politecn Milan, Dept Energy, End Use Efficiency Res Grp, Via Lambruschini 4, I-20156 Milan, Italy.
EM lorenzo.pagliano@polimi.it
RI ; Kindinis, Andrea/G-8979-2017
OI Causone, Francesco/0000-0002-8694-7232; Kindinis,
   Andrea/0000-0002-9757-3010
CR Alcamo G., 2011, 5 INT C SOLARIS 10 1
   [Anonymous], 2013, 150992003 ISO
   [Anonymous], ASHRAE T
   [Anonymous], 2008, JCGM 100: Evaluation of Measurement DataGuide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement
   [Anonymous], 2014, 2012014 NFRC
   [Anonymous], 2008, 2002008 JCGM
   [Anonymous], 1994, BUILD ENG
   [Anonymous], 2015, MATHWORKS ONL MAN
   [Anonymous], 1993, C236891993E1 ASTM
   [Anonymous], 2011, BSEN410
   Athienitis A.K., 2002, THERMAL ANAL DESIGN
   Attia S, 2015, 10 C ADV BUILD SKINS
   Cattarin G, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V54, P606, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.012
   Cattarin G., 2017, THESIS
   Causone F, 2010, ENERG BUILDINGS, V42, P305, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.09.008
   Chatziangelidis K, 2009, APPL THERM ENG, V29, P1096, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.05.026
   COST TU1403, 2015, TU1403 COST TU DELFT
   Davies MG, 2004, Building heat transfer, V1st
   Duffle J.A., 1991, SOLAR ENG THERMAL PR
   Favoino F, 2015, APPL ENERG, V156, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.065
   Fiorito F, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V55, P863, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.086
   Fraisse G, 2002, ENERG BUILDINGS, V34, P1017, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00019-1
   Gouda MM, 2002, BUILD ENVIRON, V37, P1255, DOI 10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00121-4
   Hahne E, 1996, SOL ENERGY, V58, P239, DOI 10.1016/S0038-092X(96)00080-1
   ISO, 1994, 89901994 ISO
   Jiménez MJ, 2008, SOL ENERGY, V82, P573, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2008.02.013
   Kalyanova O, 2009, EMPIRICAL VALIDATION
   KAMMINGA W, 1985, INT J HEAT MASS TRAN, V28, P433, DOI 10.1016/0017-9310(85)90076-6
   Klems J. H., 1996, ASHRAE WINT M ATL GA
   Klems JH, 1982, 3 INT S EN CONS BUIL
   Kuhn TE, 2006, ENERG BUILDINGS, V38, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.10.002
   Kuhn TE, 2006, ENERG BUILDINGS, V38, P661, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.10.001
   Kuhn TE, 2000, SOL ENERGY, V69, P59
   Kuhn TE, 2014, ENERG BUILDINGS, V84, P388, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.08.021
   Loonen R.C., 2015, 10 C ADV BUILD SKINS
   Loonen RCGM, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V25, P483, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.016
   Manz H, 2006, BUILD ENVIRON, V41, P1784, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.020
   Villar NM, 2009, SOL ENERGY, V83, P1086, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2009.01.014
   NFRC National Fenestration Rating Council, 2004, 2002004 NFRC
   Pagliano L, 2010, ADV BUILD ENERGY RES, V4, P167, DOI 10.3763/aber.2009.0406
   Platzer W.J., 2000, P 3 INT ISES EUR SOL
   Raithby G.D., 1998, HDB HEAT TRANSFER, p4.32
   Schnieders J, 1997, SOL ENERGY, V61, P179, DOI 10.1016/S0038-092X(97)00036-4
   Tagliafico LA, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V30, P526, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.023
   Underwood C., 2004, MODELLING METHODS EN
   Underwood CP, 2014, ENERG BUILDINGS, V79, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.05.001
   van der Linden G.P., 1995, COMPASS INSTALLATION
   van Dijk H.A.L., 1995, PASLINK CALIBRATION
   WIJEYSUNDERA NE, 1978, SOL ENERGY, V21, P517, DOI 10.1016/0038-092X(78)90077-4
NR 49
TC 9
Z9 10
U1 1
U2 12
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA PO BOX 564, 1001 LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND
SN 0378-7788
EI 1872-6178
J9 ENERG BUILDINGS
JI Energy Build.
PD OCT 15
PY 2017
VL 153
BP 513
EP 524
DI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.07.028
PG 12
WC Construction & Building Technology; Energy & Fuels; Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Energy & Fuels; Engineering
GA FJ7SQ
UT WOS:000412959600042
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sperotto, A
   Torresan, S
   Gallina, V
   Coppola, E
   Crittoa, A
   Marcomini, A
AF Sperotto, A.
   Torresan, S.
   Gallina, V.
   Coppola, E.
   Crittoa, A.
   Marcomini, A.
TI A multi-disciplinary approach to evaluate pluvial floods risk under
   changing climate: The case study of the municipality of Venice (Italy)
SO SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Pluvial floods; Risk assessment; Climate change; Urban areas; GIS maps
ID CHANGE IMPACTS; RAINFALL; PRECIPITATION; ADAPTATION; MODEL
AB Global climate change is likely to pose increasing threats in nearly all sectors and across all sub-regions worldwide (IPCC, 2014). Particularly, extreme weather events (e.g. heavy precipitations), together with changing exposure and vulnerability patterns, are expected to increase the damaging effect of storms, pluvial floods and coastal flooding. Developing climate and adaptation services for local planners and decision makers is becoming essential to transfer and communicate sound scientific knowledge about climate related risks and foster the development of national, regional and local adaptation strategies. In order to analyze the effect of climate change on pluvial flood risk and advice adaptation planning, a Regional Risk Assessment (RRA) methodology was developed and applied to the urban territory of the municipality of Venice. Based on the integrated analysis of hazard, exposure, vulnerability and risk, RRA allows identifying and prioritizing targets and sub -areas that are more likely to be affected by pluvial flood risk due to heavy precipitation events in the future scenario 2041-2050. From the early stages of its development and application, the RRA followed a bottom-up approach taking into account the requests, knowledge and perspectives of local stakeholders of the North Adriatic region by means of interactive workshops, surveys and discussions. Results of the analysis showed that all targets (i.e. residential, commercial -industrial areas and infrastructures) are vulnerable to pluvial floods due to the high impermeability and low slope of the topography. The spatial pattern of risk mostly reflects the distribution of the hazard and the districts with the higher percentage of receptors' surface in the higher risk classes (i.e. very high, high and medium) are Lido-Pellestrina and Marghera. The paper discusses how risk -based maps and statistics integrate scientific and local knowledge with the final aim to mainstream climate adaptation in the development of risk mitigation and urban plans. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights eserved.
C1 [Sperotto, A.; Torresan, S.; Gallina, V.; Crittoa, A.; Marcomini, A.] Ctr Euromediterraneo Cambiamenti Climat CMCC, Via Augusto Imperatore 16, I-73100 Lecce, Italy.
   [Sperotto, A.; Torresan, S.; Gallina, V.; Crittoa, A.; Marcomini, A.] Univ Ca Foscari Venice, Dept Environm Sci Informat & Stat, Via Ind 21-8, I-30175 Venice, Italy.
   [Coppola, E.] Abdus Salaam Int Ctr Theoret Phys, Str Costiera 11, I-34151 Trieste, Italy.
C3 Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici (CMCC); Universita Ca
   Foscari Venezia; Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical
   Physics (ICTP)
RP Sperotto, A (corresponding author), Ctr Euromediterraneo Cambiamenti Climat CMCC, Via Augusto Imperatore 16, I-73100 Lecce, Italy.; Sperotto, A (corresponding author), Univ Ca Foscari Venice, Dept Environm Sci Informat & Stat, Via Ind 21-8, I-30175 Venice, Italy.
RI Marcomini, Antonio/JSL-7114-2023; Sperotto, Anna/T-9782-2019
OI Coppola, Erika/0000-0001-6944-5815; SPEROTTO, Anna/0000-0002-7443-646X;
   TORRESAN, Silvia/0000-0002-9758-7084
FU European Commission within CLIM-RUN; Italian Ministry of Education,
   University and Research; Italian Ministry of Environment, Land and Sea
   within GEMINA project
FX This work was funded by the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) of the
   European Commission within the collaborative projects CLIM-RUN (Climate
   Local Information in the Mediterranean region Responding to User Needs)
   and from the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research and
   the Italian Ministry of Environment, Land and Sea within the GEMINA
   project. The authors would like to thank all the local stakeholders of
   the North Adriatic coastal zone taking part in the CLIM-RUN project for
   the fruitful collaboration and the supply of data. Moreover, a special
   thank is for the stakeholder expert Valentina Giannini, the climate
   experts Filippo Giorgi, Graziano Giuliani, Silvio Gualdi and Alessio
   Bellucci and the GIS expert Elisa Furlan, which helped in the
   elaboration of risk-based maps and statistics. Finally, authors would
   like to express their appreciation to all the mentors and colleagues of
   the 2014 Summer Institute in Disaster Risk Management at the Beijing
   Normal University whose valuable advices and suggestions have led to the
   final draft of this work.
CR Abhas K., 2012, Cities and Flooding: A Guide to Integrated Urban Flood Risk Management for the 21st Century
   [Anonymous], 12 INT C URB DRAIN P
   [Anonymous], MARINE POLL IN PRESS
   [Anonymous], CONTRIBUTION WORKING, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324, 10.1017/CBO9781107415324]
   ARPA Piemonte Area Previsione e Monitoraggio Ambientale, 2004, SOGL PLUV CONV TRA D
   Barbi A., 2007, Analisi meteo-climatica dell'evento pluviometrico del 26 settembre 2007 nel veneziano
   Barredo JI, 2009, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V9, P97, DOI 10.5194/nhess-9-97-2009
   Barros VR, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1133
   Brankovic C., 2011, D 8 3 PROTOCOL DEFIN
   BROEKAERT WF, 1995, PLANT PHYSIOL, V108, P1353, DOI [10.1016/j.jaap.2012.10.004, 10.1016/j.carres.2021.108368, 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100771, 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105188, 10.1182/blood-2012-08-450627, 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.10.007, 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100721, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.10.004, 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.140]
   Castellari S, 2014, ELEMENTI STRATEGIA N
   Centro regionale di monitoraggio della sicurezza stradale, 2012, RELAZ STAT DELL FRIU
   Cheong T.S., 2013, GUIDELINES URBAN FLO
   Diakakis M, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V60, P789, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9904-7
   Escuder Bueno I., 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P2843
   European Environment Agency, 2014, PREC EXTR IND SPEC D
   Falconer R., 2008, DEV RISK ASSESSMENT
   Giannini V., 2016, Earth Perspect, V3, DOI [10.1186/s40322-016-0033-z, DOI 10.1186/S40322-016-0033-Z]
   Giorgi F, 2012, CLIM RES, V52, P7, DOI 10.3354/cr01018
   Glade T., 2005, LANDSLIDE HAZARD RIS, P1, DOI [10.1002/9780470012659.ch1, DOI 10.1002/9780470012659.CH1]
   Goosen H, 2013, REG ENV CHANG, V13
   Houston D, 2011, PLUVIAL RAIN RELATED
   HUNSAKER CT, 1990, ENVIRON MANAGE, V14, P325, DOI 10.1007/BF02394200
   Huong HTL, 2013, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V17, P379, DOI 10.5194/hess-17-379-2013
   Isotta FA, 2014, INT J CLIMATOL, V34, P1657, DOI 10.1002/joc.3794
   ISPRA-Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, 2012, MAP EUR ENV LANDSC L
   ISTAT-Italian National Institute of Statistics, 2014, POP DENS EXTR POP HO
   Iyalomhe F, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V537, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.111
   Kalbfleisch J.G., 1985, SPRINGER TEXTS STAT
   Kazama S, 2009, SUSTAIN SCI, V4, P61, DOI 10.1007/s11625-008-0064-y
   Landis W.G., 2005, REGIONAL SCALE ECOLO
   Larsen AN, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V60, P2205, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.650
   Markandya A., 2004, METODOLOGIA VALORAR, P164
   Mitchell JK, 2003, RISK ANAL, V23, P567, DOI 10.1111/1539-6924.00337
   Molina JL, 2013, J HYDROL, V479, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.038
   Mote TL, 2007, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V34, DOI 10.1029/2007GL031903
   Municipality of Venice, 2013, STOR TERR IER OGGI M
   Municipality of Venice, 2011, ADM BOUND
   Pasini S, 2012, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V440, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.096
   Preston B., 2008, Mapping climate change vulnerability in the Sydney Coastal Councils Group
   Provincia di Venezia, 2011, Manuali degli attrezzi e sistemi di pesca in laguna di Venezia
   Prtner H.O, 2022, Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, P3056, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844]
   Riahi K., 2010, CLIM CHANG, V109
   Ronco P, 2014, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V18, P5399, DOI 10.5194/hess-18-5399-2014
   Rousset N., 2014, D 1 1 REP CLIM RUN P
   Ruti P., 2014, MEDCORDEX INITIATIVE
   Santini M, 2011, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V11, P483, DOI 10.1007/s10113-010-0157-x
   Sartori G., 2012, Rapporto Tecnico
   Scheid C., 2013, GIS BASED METHODOLOG
   Shepherd JM, 2002, J APPL METEOROL, V41, P689, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<0689:RMBMUA>2.0.CO;2
   Torresan S., 2014, 265192 CLIMRUN
   UNISDR, 2009, GLOB ASS REP DIS RIS
   van Vuuren DP, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P5, DOI [10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z, 10.1007/s10584-011-0157-y]
   Veneto, 2006, DIG EL MOD DEM VEN R
   Veneto Regione, 2007, AGG MOD FUNZ CTR FUN
   World Meteorological Organization, 1992, 182 WMO, V2nd
   Zald A.E., 2006, Z GIS ILLUSTRATED DI
   Zhou Q, 2012, J HYDROL, V414, P539, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.031
NR 58
TC 60
Z9 62
U1 4
U2 133
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0048-9697
EI 1879-1026
J9 SCI TOTAL ENVIRON
JI Sci. Total Environ.
PD AUG 15
PY 2016
VL 562
BP 1031
EP 1043
DI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.150
PG 13
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA DN9AW
UT WOS:000377372400102
PM 27161907
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Zhao, GJ
   Li, EH
   Mu, XM
   Wen, ZM
   Rayburg, S
   Tian, P
AF Zhao, Guangju
   Li, Erhui
   Mu, Xingmin
   Wen, Zhongming
   Rayburg, Scott
   Tian, Peng
TI Changing trends and regime shift of streamflow in the Yellow River basin
SO STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Yellow River; Streamflow; Temporal trend; Regime shift; Human activities
ID PAST 50 YEARS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FLOW REGIME; WATER-RESOURCES; LOESS
   PLATEAU; SEDIMENT LOAD; VARIABILITY; DISCHARGE; IMPACTS; CHINA
AB Water shortages have become one of the most severe problems in semi-arid regions throughout the world. Although semi-arid regions have always been dry, human activities and climate change are acerbating the problem. In Chinese Yellow River basin, the river is the major source of freshwater for those living there, and they have long suffered from serious water shortages. However, increasing population and decreasing streamflow are making these shortages more acute. This study seeks to quantify changes in available water in the Yellow River basin over the last 100 years and attempts to determine causes for these changes. To do this, the study evaluated changing trends and regime shifts of streamflow using long term historical records at different hydrological stations in the Yellow River basin over the past century. The results show that annual streamflow has a significant decreasing trends (P < 0.01) in the mid-lower reaches of the basin. Streamflow decomposition by the breaks for additive seasonal and trend approach suggest that this trend can be decomposed into four distinct annual stages (1919-1933, 1934-1969, 1970-1986 and 1987-2011), while the seasonal component demonstrated an evident regime shift in 1986. This regime shift is mainly related to the construction of large reservoirs in the basin. The flow duration curves illustrate a decrease in the magnitude of streamflow over the last century with a relatively uniform flow regime at all stations. The reconstructed streamflow at Toudaoguai station suggests that agricultural irrigation is predominantly responsible for streamflow reductions between Lanzhou and Toudaoguai stations with approximately 9.1 km(3)/a of water extracted between 1997 and 2006. Meanwhile, a decrease of incoming water from upper reaches and soil and water conservation measures were responsible for the significant decline in annual streamflow at mid-lower reaches station. The result of this paper should be of use for water resources planning, watershed management and climate adaptation as they demonstrate how natural and anthropogenic drivers influence water availability in semi-arid regions.
C1 [Zhao, Guangju; Mu, Xingmin; Wen, Zhongming] Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
   [Zhao, Guangju; Mu, Xingmin; Wen, Zhongming] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
   [Zhao, Guangju; Mu, Xingmin; Wen, Zhongming] Minist Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
   [Zhao, Guangju] Tsinghua Univ, State Key Lab Hydrosci & Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Erhui] Nortjwest A&F Univ, Coll Water Resources & Architectural Engn, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
   [Rayburg, Scott] Swinburne Univ Technol, Fac Engn & Ind Sci, Hawthorn, Vic 3122, Australia.
   [Tian, Peng] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Nat Resources & Environm, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
C3 Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Soil & Water Conservation
   (ISWC), CAS; Northwest A&F University - China; Chinese Academy of
   Sciences; Institute of Soil & Water Conservation (ISWC), CAS; Ministry
   of Water Resources; Tsinghua University; Swinburne University of
   Technology; Northwest A&F University - China
RP Mu, XM (corresponding author), Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, 26 Xinong Rd, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
EM xmmu@ms.iswc.ac.cn
RI Peng, Tian/HZJ-9570-2023; WEN, Zhongming/F-1215-2010
OI Zhao, Guangju/0000-0001-7756-4494; Rayburg, Scott/0009-0009-4218-506X;
   Zhao, Guangju/0000-0002-4233-9403
FU Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZZD-EW-04-03]; National Science and
   Technology Ministry [2012BAB02B05]; Fundamental Research Funds for the
   Central Universities [QN2013071]; State key Laboratory of Hydroscience
   and Engineering, Tsinghua University [SKLHSE-2012-B-01]; West Light
   Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Science [2011ZD03]
FX This work was supported by the Key Research Program of the Chinese
   Academy of Sciences (No. KZZD-EW-04-03), the Key Project of the National
   Science and Technology Ministry (No. 2012BAB02B05), the Fundamental
   Research Funds for the Central Universities (QN2013071) and the Open
   Research Fund Program of State key Laboratory of Hydroscience and
   Engineering, Tsinghua University (SKLHSE-2012-B-01) and West Light
   Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Science (2011ZD03). Moreover, the
   authors express their thanks to the Yellow River Conservancy Committee
   (YRCC) for providing data. Special appreciation is also given to the
   anonymous reviewers proposing their constructive suggestions which
   greatly improved the manuscript.
CR Acosta M.M., 2011, ASSESSMENT CHANGING
   Burn DH, 2002, J HYDROL, V255, P107, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00514-5
   Dettinger MD, 2000, J HYDROMETEOROL, V1, P289, DOI 10.1175/1525-7541(2000)001<0289:GCOSFS>2.0.CO;2
   Dyer F, 2014, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V28, P67, DOI 10.1007/s00477-013-0744-8
   Fu GB, 2007, WATER RESOUR RES, V43, DOI 10.1029/2007WR005890
   Guo Y, 2014, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V28, P333, DOI 10.1007/s00477-013-0752-8
   He B, 2013, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V185, P6187, DOI 10.1007/s10661-012-3016-z
   Jia XL, 2015, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V29, P2213, DOI 10.1007/s00477-014-1012-2
   Kendall M. G., 1948, Rank correlation methods.
   Kundzewicz ZW, 2004, HYDROLOG SCI J, V49, P3, DOI 10.1623/hysj.49.1.3.53995
   Liang K, 2013, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V27, P1741, DOI 10.1007/s00477-013-0713-2
   Liu QA, 2010, J HYDROL, V395, P226, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.031
   Mann HB, 1945, ECONOMETRICA, V13, P245, DOI 10.2307/1907187
   Miao CY, 2010, PROG PHYS GEOG, V34, P541, DOI 10.1177/0309133310369434
   Milliman JD, 2008, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V62, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.03.001
   Milly PCD, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P573, DOI 10.1126/science.1151915
   Milly PCD, 2005, NATURE, V438, P347, DOI 10.1038/nature04312
   Mu XM, 2007, HYDROL PROCESS, V21, P2124, DOI 10.1002/hyp.6391
   Mu XM, 2012, CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, V40, P303, DOI 10.1002/clen.201000319
   Oki T, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P1068, DOI 10.1126/science.1128845
   Peters DL, 2001, HYDROL PROCESS, V15, P3181, DOI 10.1002/hyp.321
   Piao SL, 2010, NATURE, V467, P43, DOI 10.1038/nature09364
   Verbesselt J, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P2970, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2010.08.003
   Verbesselt J, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.014
   Wang HJ, 2007, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V57, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.01.003
   Wang HJ, 2006, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V50, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.01.005
   Wang Y, 2013, SCI CHINA EARTH SCI, V56, P1398, DOI 10.1007/s11430-012-4505-1
   Xin ZB, 2011, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V11, P149, DOI 10.1007/s10113-010-0127-3
   Xu JX, 2005, ENVIRON MANAGE, V35, P620, DOI 10.1007/s00267-004-3094-y
   Yang DW, 2004, WATER RESOUR RES, V40, DOI 10.1029/2003WR002763
   Yang T, 2010, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V24, P297, DOI 10.1007/s00477-009-0318-y
   Ye BS, 2003, WATER RESOUR RES, V39, DOI 10.1029/2003WR001991
   YRCC, 1960, HYDR YB YELL RIV
   YRCC Yellow River Conservancy Committee, 1998, YRCC YELL RIV WAT RE
   YRCC Yellow River Conservancy Committee, 1962, STREAMFL SED LOAD 19
   Yue S, 2003, HYDROLOG SCI J, V48, P51, DOI 10.1623/hysj.48.1.51.43478
   Yue S, 2002, HYDROL PROCESS, V16, P1807, DOI 10.1002/hyp.1095
   Zeileis A, 2005, ECONOMET REV, V24, P445, DOI 10.1080/07474930500406053
   Zhang Q, 2009, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V23, P1157, DOI 10.1007/s11269-008-9320-2
   Zhang X.P., 2008, Water Resour Res, V44, DOI DOI 10.1029/2007WR006711
   Zhang ZX, 2011, J HYDROL, V409, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.07.041
   Zhao GJ, 2014, J HYDROL, V519, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.014
   Zhao GJ, 2013, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V68, p159A, DOI 10.2489/jswc.68.6.159A
   Zhao GJ, 2013, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V24, P499, DOI 10.1002/ldr.2246
   Zhao GJ, 2010, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V24, P689, DOI 10.1007/s11269-009-9465-7
   Zheng HX, 2007, HYDROL PROCESS, V21, P886, DOI 10.1002/hyp.6280
   ,, 2007, Climate change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Group I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers
NR 47
TC 46
Z9 57
U1 7
U2 113
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 1436-3240
EI 1436-3259
J9 STOCH ENV RES RISK A
JI Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess.
PD JUL
PY 2015
VL 29
IS 5
BP 1331
EP 1343
DI 10.1007/s00477-015-1058-9
PG 13
WC Engineering, Environmental; Engineering, Civil; Environmental Sciences;
   Statistics & Probability; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Mathematics; Water
   Resources
GA CK0YS
UT WOS:000355932400006
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wachowiak, W
AF Wachowiak, Witold
TI Genetic relationships between Polish and reference populations of Scots
   pine (<i>Pinus sylvestris</i> L.) in Europe based on nucleotide
   polymorphism study at nuclear loci
SO SYLWAN
LA Polish
DT Article
DE nucleotide polymorphism; recolonization; selection; Pinus sylvestris
ID CLIMATIC ADAPTATION; DIVERSITY; PATTERNS
AB Adaptation to local environmental gradients is one of main characteristics of living organisms. Scots pine (Finns sylvestris L.) is the most widely distributed conifer in the world and main forest forming component in Europe. Based on genetic, morphological and growth performance traits, several local ecotypes of the species were distinguished across the species distribution range. The existence of local ecotypes differentiated at many adaptive and phenotypic traits provides unique opportunity for addressing the questions about the genetic basis of local adaptation across the species distribution range. However, information about the underlying population structure between ecotypes is needed for efficient studies of adaptive variation at molecular level. The presented study focused on the genetic variation analysis between nineteen populations of Scots pine from across geographical locations in Poland and eleven reference samples from Northern, Western and Southern Europe. The pattern of nucleotide polymorphisms at 673 polymorphic nucleotide sites found across twenty nine nuclear loci was studied to determine genetic relationship and population structure of different geographical locations. Genetic relationships between populations were conducted based on Baysian assignment and conventional frequency based statistics at the within and between population level. The results indicate very uniform genetic background of Polish populations of the species that despite high phenotypic and ecological differentiation most likely share the same recolonization history. High genetic similarity was found between Polish and North European range of the species. In contrast, differentiation was found in relation to the reference populations from Scotland and Spain that in previous studies were shown to deviate from simple recolonization model after last glaciations and had unique mtDNA mitotypes not observed in continental continuous range of the species, respectively. Considering high differentiation at quantitative traits between northern and central part of the species range in Europe but very homogenous genetic background found in the presented study, it seems that this part of Scots pine distribution is particularly suitable for association genetic studies to find genomic regions that are involved in species adaptive and phenotypic variation.
C1 [Wachowiak, Witold] Uniwersytet A Mickiewicza, Inst Biol Srodowiska, PL-61614 Poznan, Poland.
   [Wachowiak, Witold] Polskiej Akad Nauk, Inst Dendrol, PL-62035 Kornik, Poland.
C3 Polish Academy of Sciences
RP Wachowiak, W (corresponding author), Uniwersytet A Mickiewicza, Inst Biol Srodowiska, Ul Umultowska 89, PL-61614 Poznan, Poland.
EM witoldw@man.poznan.pl
CR Austerlitz F, 2000, GENETICS, V154, P1309
   Boratynski A., 1993, Biology of Scots pine
   Corander J, 2007, MATH BIOSCI, V205, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.mbs.2006.09.015
   Excoffier L, 2004, MOL ECOL, V13, P853, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02004.x
   Excoffier L, 2005, EVOL BIOINFORM, V1, P47, DOI 10.1177/117693430500100003
   Hurme P, 2000, GENETICS, V156, P1309
   Hurme P, 1997, CAN J FOREST RES, V27, P716, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-27-5-716
   Karhu A, 1996, THEOR APPL GENET, V93, P215, DOI 10.1007/BF00225748
   Provan J, 1998, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V265, P1697, DOI 10.1098/rspb.1998.0491
   Prus-Glowacki W, 2012, FLORA, V207, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.flora.2011.11.006
   Ray N, 2003, MOL BIOL EVOL, V20, P76, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msg009
   Savolainen O, 2007, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V38, P595, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095646
   Shutyaev AM, 1997, SILVAE GENET, V46, P332
   Soranzo N, 2000, MOL ECOL, V9, P1205, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00994.x
   Tamura K, 2011, MOL BIOL EVOL, V28, P2731, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msr121
   Wachowiak W, 2011, HEREDITY, V106, P775, DOI 10.1038/hdy.2010.118
   Wachowiak W, 2009, TREE GENET GENOMES, V5, P117, DOI 10.1007/s11295-008-0188-3
   WEIR BS, 1984, EVOLUTION, V38, P1358, DOI [10.2307/2408641, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x]
   Wright SI, 2005, MOL BIOL EVOL, V22, P506, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msi035
NR 19
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 0
U2 16
PU POLSKIE TOWARZYSTWO LESNE
PI WARSZAWA
PA KOMITET REDAKCYJNY SYLWANA, UL BITWY WARSZAWSKIEJ 1920 R NR 3, WARSZAWA,
   PL-02 362, POLAND
SN 0039-7660
J9 SYLWAN
JI Sylwan
PD JAN
PY 2015
VL 159
IS 1
BP 53
EP 61
PG 9
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA CB9FS
UT WOS:000349938000006
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Elum, ZA
   Snijder, M
AF Elum, Zelda Anne
   Snijder, Mieke
TI Climate change perception and adaptation among farmers in coastal
   communities of Bayelsa State, Nigeria: a photovoice study
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATE CHANGE STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptation; Coastal; Climate change; Farmers; Photovoice; Perception;
   Risk
ID STRATEGIES; IMPACTS; RISKS
AB PurposeThere is an increasing need for greater awareness and understanding of the risks climate change poses to farming communities so as to inform appropriate adaptive responses. The purpose of this study is to investigate farmers' climate change impacts, awareness, risk perception and current adaptation strategies adopted to deal with the impacts of climate change on their livelihood. Design/methodology/approachThis research was undertaken with 67 farmers in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. This study used a combination of focus group discussion and quantitative survey to obtain data. Surveyed farmers were invited to an initial workshop and asked to take photos of climate change impacts on their land and the adaptation strategies being adopted. The photos were analysed and discussed with the farmers in a second workshop. Then, in a third workshop, farmers and other stakeholders came together to rank the most important consequences of climate change and shared knowledge on adaptation strategies. The survey and photovoice data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. FindingsThe results of this study showed that a majority of the farmers were knowledgeable of climate change, mostly got climate information through media. Floods and high temperatures were perceived as the most occurring climate change-related disaster risks. Majority of the farmers perceived climate change as high risk and have taken up multiple adaptation strategies in response to it, including changing planting times, mulching their land and digging irrigation pits. Farmers' responses indicated that they want to do more but are restricted by financial resources. Practical implicationsThis study outcomes provide evidence for a need to consider stakeholders' participation in planning climate change responses to effectively address the challenges posed by climate change, particularly in coastal agricultural communities. Government and relevant agencies as recommended need to support farmers to undertake needed adaptive strategies to adapt with future flooding, high temperature and drought, providing them with necessary facilities to enhance their adaptive capacities. Originality/valueTo the best of the authors' knowledge, this was one of the first studies to use photovoice to investigate climate change awareness, impacts and adaptations strategies with majority female farmers in west Africa. This study highlights the importance of participatory approaches to capture grassroots climate adaptation approaches.
C1 [Elum, Zelda Anne] Univ Port Harcourt, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness Management, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.
   [Snijder, Mieke] Inst Dev Studies, Participat Inclus & Social Change Cluster, Brighton, England.
C3 University of Port Harcourt
RP Elum, ZA (corresponding author), Univ Port Harcourt, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness Management, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.
EM zeldaforreal@yahoo.com; m.snijder@ids.ac.uk
RI Elum, Zelda/AAL-6018-2020
FU Royal Society [CSC\R1\211023]
FX The research was supported by grant #CSC\R1\211023 from the Royal
   Society under the Commonwealth Science Conference Follow-on Travel Grant
   2021. The views expressed here are those of the authors and not of the
   Royal Society.
CR Abraham EM, 2018, MANAG ENVIRON QUAL, V29, P165, DOI 10.1108/MEQ-01-2017-0001
   Aderogba K.A., 2012, INT J ACAD RES EC MA, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.17142/IJBAS-2012.1.2.4
   Akankali J.A., 2014, NIGERIA ANN EXPT BIO, V2, P45
   Amusa T.A., 2011, NIGERIA INT J AGR EC, V4, P97
   [Anonymous], 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE IMPAC
   Anugwa I. Q., 2018, International Journal of Agricultural Extension, V6, P29
   Ardrey J, 2021, GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, V14, DOI 10.1080/16549716.2021.2006425
   Bele MY, 2013, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V5, P181, DOI 10.1108/17568691311327587
   Bennett NJ, 2013, LOCAL ENVIRON, V18, P983, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2012.748733
   Bradford RA, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P2299, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-2299-2012
   Bulla B, 2016, AGROECOL SUST FOOD, V40, P1106, DOI 10.1080/21683565.2016.1225623
   Canon M., 2021, SAGE HDB PARTICIPATO
   Echendu AJ, 2020, ECOSYST HEALTH SUST, V6, DOI 10.1080/20964129.2020.1791735
   Elum ZA, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V23, P12880, DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-6864-1
   Elum ZA, 2017, CLIM RISK MANAG, V16, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2016.11.001
   Elum ZA, 2016, S AFR J ECON MANAG S, V19, P549, DOI 10.4102/sajems.v19i4.1384
   Eneji CVO, 2021, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V13, P397, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-06-2020-0070
   Ho MC, 2008, RISK ANAL, V28, P635, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01040.x
   Hochachka G, 2022, SUSTAIN SCI, V17, P519, DOI 10.1007/s11625-021-00965-4
   IPCC/AR6, 2022, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, P3676
   Jagosh J, 2012, MILBANK Q, V90, P311, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00665.x
   Jalil M.M., 2013, PRACTICAL GUIDELINES
   Matemilola S, 2019, CLIMATE, V7, DOI 10.3390/cli7020029
   Mavhura E, 2017, GEOFORUM, V86, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.09.008
   Nguyen MT, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V92, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.016
   National Bureau of Statistic, 2018, NAT NUTR HLTH SURV R
   Ndambiri H. K., 2013, International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics, V1, P75
   Netzel LM, 2021, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V14, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12688
   Nzeadibe T. C., 2011, CLIMATE CHANGE AWARE
   Ochuba O.I., 2020, ASIAN J EC BUSINESS, V16, P17, DOI [DOI 10.9734/AJEBA/2020/V16I430244, 10.9734/ajeba/2020/v16i430244]
   Ofoegbu C, 2021, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V13, P19, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-04-2020-0030
   Ojoyi MM, 2015, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V7, P97, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-12-2012-0072
   Onoja A. O., 2014, Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, V5, P76
   Oxfam and Development Finance International, 2019, W AFR GOV AR LEAST C
   Parry M., 2007, Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change
   Pilli-Sihvola K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P1266, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.12.004
   Robert Odubo Tonbra, 2019, British Journal of Environmental Sciences, V7, P45
   Rojas-Downing MM, 2017, CLIM RISK MANAG, V16, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2017.02.001
   Snijder M, 2020, AUST J RURAL HEALTH, V28, P338, DOI 10.1111/ajr.12655
   Tangonyire D.F., 2021, Ecofeminism Clim. Chang, V2, P50, DOI [10.1108/EFCC-04-2020-0009, DOI 10.1108/EFCC-04-2020-0009]
   Tarfa PY, 2019, APPL ECOL ENV RES, V17, P7085, DOI 10.15666/aeer/1703_70857112
   Taruvinga A., 2016, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, V7, P687, DOI 10.18178/ijesd.2016.7.9.863
   Teka O, 2013, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V5, P166, DOI 10.1108/17568691311327578
   Ullah W, 2018, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V10, P359, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-02-2017-0038
   Uyigue E., 2007, COPING CLIMATE CHANG, DOI [10.1088/1755-1307/6/35/352041, DOI 10.1088/1755-1307/6/35/352041]
   Wang C, 1997, HEALTH EDUC BEHAV, V24, P369, DOI 10.1177/109019819702400309
   Weber EU, 2010, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V1, P332, DOI 10.1002/wcc.41
   Yila JO, 2013, MANAG ENVIRON QUAL, V24, P341, DOI 10.1108/14777831311322659
   Zahid Zainal Zahid Zainal, 2014, Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, V8, P331
NR 49
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 7
U2 18
PU EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
PI Leeds
PA floor 5, Northspring 21-23 Wellington Street, Leeds, W YORKSHIRE,
   ENGLAND
SN 1756-8692
EI 1756-8706
J9 INT J CLIM CHANG STR
JI Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strateg. Manag.
PD NOV 6
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 5
BP 745
EP 767
DI 10.1108/IJCCSM-07-2022-0100
EA AUG 2023
PG 23
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA X1WN7
UT WOS:001048388400001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Spencer, S
   Samateh, T
   Wabnitz, K
   Mayhew, S
   Allen, H
   Bonell, A
AF Spencer, Shantelle
   Samateh, Tida
   Wabnitz, Katharina
   Mayhew, Susannah
   Allen, Haddijatou
   Bonell, Ana
TI The Challenges of Working in the Heat Whilst Pregnant: Insights From
   Gambian Women Farmers in the Face of Climate Change
SO FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; health; women; climate adaptation; The Gambia;
   occupational heat stress
ID HEALTH; INTERSECTIONALITY; GENDER
AB BackgroundThe expected increase in heat in The Gambia is one of the most significant health threats caused by climate change. However, little is known about the gendered dynamics of exposure and response to heat stress, including women's perceived health risks, their adaptation strategies to heat, and their perceptions of climate change. This research project aims to answer the question of whether and how pregnant farmers in The Gambia perceive and act upon occupational heat stress and its health impacts on both themselves and their unborn children, against the backdrop of current and expected climatic changes. MethodIn-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 women who practice subsistence farming and were either pregnant or had delivered within the past month in West Kiang, The Gambia. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Translated interview transcripts were coded and qualitative thematic content analysis with an intersectional lens was used to arrive at the results. ResultsAll women who participated in the study experience significant heat stress while working outdoors during pregnancy, with symptoms often including headache, dizziness, nausea, and chills. The most common adaptive techniques included resting in the shade while working, completing their work in multiple shorter time increments, taking medicine to reduce symptoms like headache, using water to cool down, and reducing the amount of area they cultivate. Layered identities, experiences, and household power structures related to age, migration, marital situation, socioeconomic status, and supportive social relationships shaped the extent to which women were able to prevent and reduce the effects of heat exposure during their work whilst pregnant. Women who participated in this study demonstrated high awareness of climate change and offered important insights into potential values, priorities, and mechanisms to enable effective adaptation. ConclusionOur findings reveal many intersecting social and economic factors that shape the space within which women can make decisions and take adaptive action to reduce the impact of heat during their pregnancy. To improve the health of pregnant working women exposed to heat, these intersectionalities must be considered when supporting women to adapt their working practices and cope with heat stress.
C1 [Spencer, Shantelle; Samateh, Tida; Allen, Haddijatou; Bonell, Ana] Gambia London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Med Res Council Unit, Banjul, Gambia.
   [Wabnitz, Katharina] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst Med Informat Proc Biometry & Epidemiol IBE, Chair Publ Hlth & Hlth Serv Res, Munich, Germany.
   [Mayhew, Susannah] Univ London, Fac Publ Hlth & Policy, London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London, England.
   [Bonell, Ana] Univ London, Ctr Climate Change & Planetary Hlth, London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London, England.
C3 University of London; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine;
   University of Munich; University of London; London School of Hygiene &
   Tropical Medicine; University of London; London School of Hygiene &
   Tropical Medicine
RP Bonell, A (corresponding author), Gambia London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Med Res Council Unit, Banjul, Gambia.; Bonell, A (corresponding author), Univ London, Ctr Climate Change & Planetary Hlth, London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London, England.
EM ana.bonell@lshtm.ac.uk
RI , Susannah/HJP-3632-2023
OI Bonell, Ana/0000-0001-5981-762X; Mayhew, Susannah/0000-0002-2433-3809
FU Wellcome Trust Global Health PhD Fellowship [216336/Z/19/Z]; Wellcome
   Trust [216336/Z/19/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
FX Funding This project was funded by a Wellcome Trust Global Health PhD
   Fellowship awarded to AB (216336/Z/19/Z).
CR Abrams JA, 2020, SOC SCI MED, V258, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113138
   Alhassan SI, 2019, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V11, P195, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2016-0156
   Bauer GR, 2014, SOC SCI MED, V110, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.022
   Bekkar B, 2020, JAMA NETW OPEN, V3, DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8243
   Bonell Ana, 2020, Wellcome Open Res, V5, P32, DOI 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15731.1
   Braun V, 2021, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V18, P328, DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Brottem L, 2018, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V29, P118, DOI 10.1002/ldr.2844
   Cannon T, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V55, P621, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9499-4
   Chersich MF, 2020, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V371, DOI 10.1136/bmj.m3811
   Crenshaw K., 2005, Violence against women: Classic papers, P282, DOI [10.2307/1229039, DOI 10.2307/1229039]
   de Paula N, 2021, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V5, pe109, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00007-3
   Djoudi H, 2016, AMBIO, V45, pS248, DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0825-2
   Flocks J, 2013, J AGROMEDICINE, V18, P350, DOI 10.1080/1059924X.2013.826607
   Flouris AD, 2018, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V2, pE521, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30237-7
   Grace K, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P479, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3318, 10.1038/nclimate3318]
   Ioannou LG, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18147698
   Ioannou LG, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18126303
   Kaijser A, 2014, ENVIRON POLIT, V23, P417, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2013.835203
   Kuehn L, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14080853
   Lowe M, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0163653
   MacGregor S., 2010, J INDIAN OCEAN REG, V6, P223, DOI [DOI 10.1080/19480881.2010.536669, 10.1080/19480881.2010.536669]
   MacVicar S, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0179010
   Masson-Delmotte V., 2021, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, P41
   Mid-Term Evaluation of the UN Environment Project, 2021, EVALUATION REPORT UN
   Olaniyan OF, 2017, FUTURE FOOD, V5, P56
   Olson David M, 2020, F1000Res, V9, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.27157.1
   Rice C, 2019, CULT STUD-CRIT METHO, V19, P409, DOI 10.1177/1532708619829779
   Runkle J, 2014, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V11, P7820, DOI 10.3390/ijerph110807820
   Sylla MB, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P1029, DOI 10.1029/2018EF000873
   UN Women Watch, 2009, WOMEN CLIMATE CHANGE
   Watts N, 2019, LANCET, V394, P1836, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32596-6
NR 31
TC 19
Z9 20
U1 1
U2 17
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-2565
J9 FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH
JI Front. Public Health
PD FEB 10
PY 2022
VL 10
AR 785254
DI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.785254
PG 11
WC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
GA ZX1DJ
UT WOS:000771640300001
PM 35237548
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Qu, CH
   Li, XX
   Ju, H
   Liu, Q
AF Qu Chun-hong
   Li Xiang-xiang
   Ju Hui
   Liu Qin
TI The impacts of climate change on wheat yield in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain
   of China using DSSAT-CERES-Wheat model under different climate scenarios
SO JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; relative contribution; wheat yield; DSSAT-CERES-Wheat
   model; Huang-Huai-Hai Plain
ID WINTER-WHEAT; NORTH CHINA; WATER-RESOURCES; GROWTH; AGRICULTURE;
   MANAGEMENT; RICE; TEMPERATURE; SENSITIVITY; CULTIVARS
AB Climate change has been documented as a major threat to current agricultural strategies. Progress in understanding the impact of climate change on crop yield is essential for agricultural climate adaptation, especially for the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain (3H Plain) of China which is an area known to be vulnerable to global warming. In this study, the impacts of climate change on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield between the baseline period (1981-2010) and two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP8.5 and RCP4.5) were simulated for the short-term (2010-2039), the medium-term (2040-2069) and the long-term (2070-2099) in the 3H Plain, by considering the relative contributions of changes in temperature, solar radiation and precipitation using the DSSAT-CERES-Wheat model. Results indicated that the maximum and minimum temperatures (TMAX and TMIN), solar radiation (SRAD), and precipitation (PREP) during the winter wheat season increased under these two RCPs. Yield analysis found that wheat yield increased with the increase in SRAD, PREP and CO 2 concentration, but decreased with an increase in temperature. Increasing precipitation contributes the most to the total impact, increasing wheat yield by 9.53, 6.62 and 23.73% for the three terms of future climate under RCP4.5 scenario, and 11.74, 16.38 and 27.78% for the three terms of future climate under RCP8.5 scenario. However, as increases in temperature bring higher evapotranspiration, which further aggravated water deficits, the supposed negative effect of increasing thermal resources decreased wheat yield by 1.92, 4.08 and 5.24% for the three terms of future climate under RCP4.5 scenario, and 3.64, 5.87 and 5.81% for the three terms of future climate under RCP8.5 scenario with clearly larger decreases in RCP8.5. Counterintuitively, the impacts in southern sub-regions were positive, but they were all negative in the remaining sub-regions. Our analysis demonstrated that in the 3H Plain, which is a part of the mid-high latitude region, the effects of increasing thermal resources were counteracted by the aggravated water deficits caused by the increase in temperature.
C1 [Qu Chun-hong] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Agr Informat Inst, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
   [Li Xiang-xiang] Agrometeorol Ctr Jiangxi Prov, Nanchang 330096, Jiangxi, Peoples R China.
   [Li Xiang-xiang] Meteorol Sci Inst Jiangxi Prov, Nanchang 330096, Jiangxi, Peoples R China.
   [Ju Hui; Liu Qin] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Environm & Sustainable Dev Agr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
C3 Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Agriculture Information
   Institute, CAAS; Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Institute of
   Environment & Sustainable Development in Agriculture, CAAS
RP Liu, Q (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Environm & Sustainable Dev Agr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
EM quchunhong@caas.cn; lixiangxiang0901@163.com; liuqin02@caas.cn
RI ju, hui/LSK-3282-2024
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41401510, 41675115];
   Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of Chinese
   Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2017-2020)
FX This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation
   of China (41401510 and 41675115) and the Agricultural Science and
   Technology Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural
   Sciences (2017-2020).
CR [Anonymous], 1991, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development
   [Anonymous], ENV RES LETT
   Hunt LA, 1998, SYST APPR S, V7, P9
   Jones JW, 1998, SYST APPR S, V7, P157
   Ju H, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V120, P313, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0803-7
   Keating BA, 2003, EUR J AGRON, V18, P267, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00108-9
   KIMBALL BA, 1983, AGRON J, V75, P779, DOI 10.2134/agronj1983.00021962007500050014x
   Knox J, 2012, ENVIRON RES LETT, V7, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034032
   Li YC, 2015, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V209, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.033
   Liu SX, 2010, AGR WATER MANAGE, V97, P1195, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.03.001
   Liu XY, 2017, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V17, P85, DOI 10.1007/s11368-016-1516-0
   Lobell DB, 2007, ENVIRON RES LETT, V2, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/2/1/014002
   Lobell DB, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P616, DOI [10.1126/science.1206376, 10.1126/science.1204531]
   Martre P, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P911, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12768
   Mei X. R., 2013, CHIN J AGR SCI, V46, P1149
   Palosuo T, 2011, EUR J AGRON, V35, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2011.05.001
   Piao SL, 2010, NATURE, V467, P43, DOI 10.1038/nature09364
   Ritchie JT, 1998, SYST APPR S, V7, P41
   Rosenweig C, 1998, SYST APPR S, V7, P267
   Schlenker W, 2010, ENVIRON RES LETT, V5, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014010
   Schlenker W, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P15594, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0906865106
   Shi WJ, 2013, J GEOGR SCI, V23, P567, DOI 10.1007/s11442-013-1029-3
   Tan JW, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V83, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.05.001
   Tao FL, 2014, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V189, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.01.013
   Tao FL, 2008, CLIM RES, V38, P83, DOI 10.3354/cr00771
   Timsina J, 2006, AGR SYST, V90, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2005.11.007
   Tubiello F, 2008, 42 WORLD BANK, P63
   Wang HL, 2008, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V148, P1242, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.03.003
   WILLIAMS JR, 1983, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V38, P381
   Xiao DP, 2014, EUR J AGRON, V52, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2013.09.020
   Xiong W, 2014, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V196, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2014.06.014
   Xiong W, 2012, ENVIRON RES LETT, V7, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044014
   Yang JY, 2015, J INTEGR AGR, V14, P2065, DOI 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60951-5
   Yao FM, 2011, CHINESE SCI BULL, V56, P729, DOI 10.1007/s11434-011-4374-6
   Yong B, 2013, J HYDROMETEOROL, V14, P1009, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-12-0116.1
   You LZ, 2009, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V149, P1009, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.12.004
   Yu Q, 2014, INT J CLIMATOL, V34, P518, DOI 10.1002/joc.3704
   Yuan WP, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep18813
   Zhang XY, 2011, AGR WATER MANAGE, V98, P1097, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.02.003
   Zhang XY, 2005, AGRON J, V97, P783, DOI 10.2134/agronj2004.0194
NR 40
TC 47
Z9 53
U1 5
U2 70
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 2095-3119
J9 J INTEGR AGR
JI J. Integr. Agric.
PD JUN
PY 2019
VL 18
IS 6
BP 1379
EP 1391
DI 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62585-2
PG 13
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA IE1NU
UT WOS:000472153400020
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Siswanto, E
   Sarker, MLR
   Peter, BN
   Takemura, T
   Horii, T
   Matsumoto, K
   Taketani, F
   Honda, MC
AF Siswanto, Eko
   Sarker, Md. Latifur Rahman
   Peter, Benny N.
   Takemura, Toshihiko
   Horii, Takanori
   Matsumoto, Kazuhiko
   Taketani, Fumikazu
   Honda, Makio C.
TI Variations of phytoplankton chlorophyll in the Bay of Bengal: Impact of
   climate changes and nutrients from different sources
SO FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE phytoplankton chlorophyll-a; satellite ocean color; nutrient supply;
   atmospheric deposition; mesoscale eddy; river discharge; climate changes
ID FRESH-WATER DISCHARGE; INDIAN-OCEAN DIPOLE; MINERAL DUST; VARIABILITY;
   ENSO; SEA; PRODUCTIVITY; EVENTS; BLOOM
AB Phytoplankton biomass, quantified as the concentration of chlorophyll-a (CHL), is the base of the marine food web that supports fisheries production in the Bay of Bengal (BoB). Nutrients from river discharge, the ocean subsurface layer, and the atmosphere have been reported to determine CHL in the BoB. Which source of nutrients mainly determines CHL in different parts of the bay has not been determined. Furthermore, how climate variations influence nutrient inputs from different sources and their impacts on CHL have not been detailed. To address these questions, we used relationships between satellite-derived CHL and in situ river discharge data (a proxy for river-borne nutrients) from 1997 to 2016, physical variables, and modeled dust deposition (DD), a proxy for atmosphere-borne nutrients. Nutrients supplied from the ocean subsurface layer were assessed based on variations in physical parameters (i.e., wind stress curl, sea surface height anomaly, and sea surface temperature). We found that nutrients from the Ganges and Brahmaputra Rivers were important for CHL along the northern coast of the bay. By increasing rainfall and river discharge, La Nina extended high-CHL waters further southward. Nutrients from the ocean subsurface layer determine CHL variations mainly in the southwestern bay. We suggest that the variations in the supply of nutrients from the subsurface layer are related to the generation of mesoscale cyclonic eddies during La Nina, a negative Indian Ocean Dipole, or both. Climate-driven cyclonic eddies together with cyclones can intensify Ekman divergence and synergistically lead to a pronounced increase in CHL in the southwestern bay. Nutrients from the atmosphere mainly determine CHL in the central/eastern BoB. We further suggest that DD in the central/eastern BoB is influenced by ENSO with a 6-7-month time lag. CHL in the central/eastern bay responds to the ENSO 6-7 months after the ENSO peak because of the 6-7-month lag between ENSO and DD. This report provides valuable information needed to plan necessary actions for climate adaptation in local fisheries activities by elucidating how climate variations influence phytoplankton.
C1 [Siswanto, Eko; Matsumoto, Kazuhiko; Taketani, Fumikazu; Honda, Makio C.] Japan Agcy Marine Earth Sci & Technol, Res Inst Global Change, Earth Surface Syst Res Ctr, Yokohama, Japan.
   [Sarker, Md. Latifur Rahman] Univ Rajshahi, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, Rajshahi, Bangladesh.
   [Peter, Benny N.] Kerala Univ Fisheries & Ocean Studies, Dept Phys Oceanog, Kochi, Kerala, India.
   [Takemura, Toshihiko] Kyushu Univ, Res Inst Appl Mech, Fukuoka, Japan.
   [Horii, Takanori] Japan Agcy Marine Earth Sci & Technol, Res Inst Global Change, Ctr Coupled Ocean Atmosphere Res, Yokosuka, Japan.
C3 Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science & Technology (JAMSTEC); University
   of Rajshahi; Kerala University of Fisheries & Ocean Studies; Kyushu
   University; Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science & Technology (JAMSTEC)
RP Siswanto, E (corresponding author), Japan Agcy Marine Earth Sci & Technol, Res Inst Global Change, Earth Surface Syst Res Ctr, Yokohama, Japan.
EM ekosiswanto@jamstec.go.jp
RI Horii, Takanori/AAE-3383-2019; Takemura, Toshihiko/C-2822-2009
FU Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology-Japan
   [KAKENHI JP18H04144]; Climate Adaptation Framework Project -
   Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research
   [CAF2017-RR02-CMY-Siswanto]
FX This research was financially supported by a Grants-in-Aid for
   Scientific Research (KAKENHI JP18H04144) from the Ministry of Education,
   Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology-Japan and by the Climate
   Adaptation Framework Project (CAF2017-RR02-CMY-Siswanto) funded by the
   Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research.
CR Ali M.M., 2007, Eos, V88, P93, DOI DOI 10.1029/2007-O080001
   Alvera-Azcárate A, 2005, OCEAN MODEL, V9, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.08.001
   Banerjee P, 2019, J CLIMATE, V32, P1525, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0403.1
   Banerjee P, 2016, J CLIMATE, V29, P1287, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0039.1
   Calil PHR, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V116, DOI 10.1029/2010JC006704
   Chen MC, 2018, CLIM DYNAM, V51, P4309, DOI 10.1007/s00382-017-3852-1
   Chen XY, 2013, DEEP-SEA RES PT I, V73, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr.2012.11.011
   Dai A, 2002, J HYDROMETEOROL, V3, P660, DOI 10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0660:EOFDFC>2.0.CO;2
   Elayaperumal V, 2019, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V163, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2019.01.001
   Felton CS, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V119, P4200, DOI 10.1002/2013JC009759
   Fukushima H., 2014, W PACIFIC AIR SEA IN, P51, DOI [10.5047/w-pass.a01.006, DOI 10.5047/W-PASS.A01.006]
   Gomes HR, 2000, CONT SHELF RES, V20, P313, DOI 10.1016/S0278-4343(99)00072-2
   Grand MM, 2015, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V29, P357, DOI 10.1002/2014GB004898
   Gulakaram VS, 2018, J OCEAN ENG SCI, V3, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.joes.2018.11.002
   Hossain MS, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-62616-5
   Jayaram C, 2019, J INDIAN SOC REMOTE, V47, P1875, DOI 10.1007/s12524-019-01034-1
   Kay S., 2018, ECOSYSTEM SERVICES W, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-71093-8_14, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-71093-8_14]
   Kitajima S, 2009, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V54, P537, DOI 10.4319/lo.2009.54.2.0537
   Kumar SP, 2010, CURR SCI INDIA, V98, P1331
   Kumar SP, 2002, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V29, DOI 10.1029/2002GL016013
   LARGE WG, 1981, J PHYS OCEANOGR, V11, P324, DOI 10.1175/1520-0485(1981)011<0324:OOMFMI>2.0.CO;2
   Lévy M, 2007, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V112, DOI 10.1029/2007JC004090
   Li JD, 2018, CLIM DYNAM, V51, P1391, DOI 10.1007/s00382-017-3961-x
   Mahala BK, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P1105, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1360-8
   Martin MV, 2015, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V120, P2193, DOI 10.1002/2014JC010162
   Nixon S, 2001, DEEP-SEA RES PT I, V48, P2521, DOI 10.1016/S0967-0637(01)00023-1
   Nixon SW, 2002, ESTUARIES, V25, P782, DOI 10.1007/BF02804905
   Oswald FL., 2012, PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT, V17, P9, DOI [10.7275/5fex-b874, DOI 10.7275/5FEX-B874]
   Pervez MS, 2015, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V15, P147, DOI 10.5194/nhess-15-147-2015
   Rao RR, 2010, DEEP-SEA RES PT I, V57, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr.2009.10.008
   Roman-Stork HL, 2021, ADV SPACE RES, V68, P378, DOI 10.1016/j.asr.2019.09.054
   Roose S, 2022, NPJ CLIM ATMOS SCI, V5, DOI 10.1038/s41612-022-00252-8
   Chowdhury RR, 2022, J OPER OCEANOGR, V15, P104, DOI 10.1080/1755876X.2020.1817659
   SHETYE SR, 1991, CONT SHELF RES, V11, P1397, DOI 10.1016/0278-4343(91)90042-5
   Siswanto E., 2022, APN SCI B, V12, P66, DOI [10.30852/sb.2022.1834, DOI 10.30852/SB.2022.1834]
   Siswanto E, 2015, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V42, P5378, DOI 10.1002/2015GL064188
   Siswanto E, 2011, J OCEANOGR, V67, P627, DOI 10.1007/s10872-011-0062-z
   Solmon F, 2015, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V15, P8051, DOI 10.5194/acp-15-8051-2015
   Sreenivas P, 2012, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V80-81, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.11.001
   Sridevi B, 2019, INDIAN J GEO-MAR SCI, V48, P253
   Takemura T, 2003, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V108, DOI 10.1029/2002JD003210
   Tan CK, 2006, CONT SHELF RES, V26, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.csr.2005.09.008
   Tandule CR, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-11231-7
   Uchida H, 2003, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V30, DOI 10.1029/2002GL016445
   Vinayachandran PN, 2009, GEOPHYS MONOGR SER, V185, P71, DOI 10.1029/2008GM000705
   Vinayachandran PN, 2003, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V30, DOI 10.1029/2002GL016717
   Vinayachandran PN, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V107, DOI 10.1029/2001JC000831
   Xu Y, 2021, PROG OCEANOGR, V198, DOI 10.1016/j.pocean.2021.102661
   Yadav K, 2016, MAR CHEM, V187, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.marchem.2016.10.004
NR 49
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 1
U2 14
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-7745
J9 FRONT MAR SCI
JI Front. Mar. Sci.
PD MAR 13
PY 2023
VL 10
AR 1052286
DI 10.3389/fmars.2023.1052286
PG 17
WC Environmental Sciences; Marine & Freshwater Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Marine & Freshwater Biology
GA A7LT1
UT WOS:000956903500001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Schuett, A
   Becker, JN
   Groengroeft, A
   Schaaf-Titel, S
   Eschenbach, A
AF Schuett, Alexander
   Becker, Joscha N.
   Groengroeft, Alexander
   Schaaf-Titel, Selina
   Eschenbach, Annette
TI Soil water stress at young urban street-tree sites in response to
   meteorology and site parameters
SO URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
LA English
DT Article
DE Soil water monitoring; Critical threshold; Soil water tension; Climate
   adaptation; Site adaptation; Water management; Reduced tree vitality;
   Soil drought; RandomForest
ID COOLING ABILITY; TILIA-CORDATA; DROUGHT; GROWTH; TEMPERATURE; MORTALITY;
   MECHANISMS; TOLERANCE; PAVEMENTS; SELECTION
AB Growth conditions at urban street-tree sites are unfavorable and tree vitality is increasingly threatened by water scarcity due to changing climate. Developing adaption and management strategies to ensure early stage and long-term tree-and root growth requires thorough knowledge about root zone soil-water dynamics at young urban street-tree sites. Therefore, we established a soil water potential (SWP) monitoring at 17 young urban street-tree sites in the city of Hamburg, Germany. Over four years (2016-2019) we measured and quantified critical soil water availability in the root ball, planting pit, and surrounding urban soil using a threshold value (SWP <-1200 hPa) and assessed the tree sites sensitivity towards meteorological variables, tree-and site characteristics using a data driven random forest model. During 2018 and 2019, average critical soil water availability in the root ball and planting pit occurred between three to five months per year, and the trees were exposed to pro-longed periods of critical soil-water availability for two consecutive years. After planting, critical soil water availability increasingly shifted year wise from the root ball into the entire planting pit as a consequence of root development and increasing water demand of the trees. Considering less usable water within the surrounding sandy soils, soil water in the planting pit may be depleted earlier and more rapidly with tree aging. The random forest model successfully predicted critical soil water availability and identified tree age as an important pre-dictor. Long-term (10-day) rainfall was the most important variable predicting the occurrence of critical soil water availability, suggesting a further extension of periods with critical soil water availability as rainy summer days are projected to decrease with climate change. Additionally we identified soil temperature as a more important predictor than air temperature as it reflects site specific characteristics affecting water-an energy balance. This study underlines the urgency to adapt the growing conditions of young urban street-trees in terms of sufficient water storage, and provides an approach for future application in tree site soil water management, to maintain their vitality under urbanization pressure and climate change.
C1 [Schuett, Alexander; Becker, Joscha N.; Groengroeft, Alexander; Schaaf-Titel, Selina; Eschenbach, Annette] Univ Hamburg, Inst Soil Sci, CEN, Hamburg, Germany.
C3 University of Hamburg
RP Schuett, A (corresponding author), Univ Hamburg, Inst Soil Sci, CEN, Hamburg, Germany.
EM Alexander.Schuett@uni-hamburg.de
RI Becker, Joscha/HHS-0056-2022
OI Becker, Joscha N./0000-0002-3210-3632
FU Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear
   Safety, Germany [03DAS153A]; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG,
   German Research Foundation) under Germany`s Excellence Strategy [EXC
   2037 'CLICCS, 390683824]
FX This work was funded by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature
   Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Germany, within the project
   "Bodensubstrat und Baumartenwahl fur klimaangepasste
   Stadtbaumpflanzungen" (BoBaSt) (funding code: 03DAS153A), and by the
   Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under
   Germany`s Excellence Strategy -EXC 2037 'CLICCS -Climate, Climatic
   Change, and Society' -Project Number: 390683824, contribution to the
   Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN) of Universitat
   Hamburg.
CR Allen CD, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P660, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001
   Allen KS, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V21, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.12.002
   Allen R., 2000, Calibration for the Watermark 200ss soil water potential sensor to fit 7-19-06 "calibration #3" table from Irrometer University of Idaho
   [Anonymous], 1991, DENDROCHRONOLOGIA
   [Anonymous], 2018, RADAR CLIMATOLOGY RA, DOI DOI 10.5676/DWD/RADKLIM_YW_V2017.002
   [Anonymous], 2010, Soil Science Society of America Journal, DOI DOI 10.2136/SSSAJ1971
   Armson D, 2013, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V12, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.04.001
   BARATAUD F, 1995, PLANT SOIL, V172, P29, DOI 10.1007/BF00020856
   Bowler DE, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V97, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
   Bréda N, 2006, ANN FOREST SCI, V63, P625, DOI 10.1051/forest:2006042
   Breiman L, 2001, MACH LEARN, V45, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Breiman L., 2001, Machine Learning, V45, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Bühler O, 2017, PLANT SOIL, V413, P29, DOI 10.1007/s11104-016-2814-4
   Buras A, 2020, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V17, P1655, DOI [10.5194/bg-17-1655-2020, 10.5194/bg-17-1655-2020,2020]
   Caplan JS, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V41, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.016
   Carranza C, 2021, J HYDROL, V593, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125840
   Cermák J, 2000, PLANT SOIL, V219, P103, DOI 10.1023/A:1004736310417
   Clark J. R., 1990, Journal of Arboriculture, V16, P203
   CRAUL P J, 1985, Journal of Arboriculture, V11, P330
   De Blécourt M, 2021, J ARID ENVIRON, V189, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2021.104500
   Eschenbach Annette., 2020, BODENSCHUTZ, V25, P103
   FLL, 2010, EMPFEHLUNGENFURBAUMP
   FreieundHansestadtHamburg, 2021, STRA ENBAUMKATASTER
   GILBERTSON P, 1990, Arboricultural Journal, V14, P287
   Gillner S, 2017, URBAN ECOSYST, V20, P853, DOI 10.1007/s11252-016-0636-z
   Grabosky J, 2015, SOIL SCI, V180, P207, DOI 10.1097/SS.0000000000000124
   Grabosky Jason, 1996, Journal of Arboriculture, V22, P255
   Granier A, 1999, ECOL MODEL, V116, P269, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(98)00205-1
   Granier A, 2007, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V143, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.12.004
   Greinert A, 2015, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V15, P1725, DOI 10.1007/s11368-014-1054-6
   Haude W., 1955, MITTEILUNGEN DTSCH W
   Jim C., 2019, Socio Ecol Pract Res, V1, P41, DOI [10.1007/s42532-018-00005-z, DOI 10.1007/S42532-018-00005-Z]
   Jim CY, 2018, ECOL ENG, V120, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.06.016
   Jim CY, 1998, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V40, P235, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00117-5
   Konijnendijk C.C., 2005, URBAN FORESTS TREES, DOI [DOI 10.1007/3-540-27684-X4, 10.1007/3-540-27684-X4]
   Kotzen B, 2003, J ARID ENVIRON, V55, P231, DOI 10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00030-2
   Krieter M., 1996, UNTERSUCHUNGENZURSTA
   Kuhn Max, 2021, UNTER MITARBEIT VON
   Larcher W., 2001, Okophysiologie der Pflanzen. Leben
   Li X, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aab0b1
   Lu J.W.T., 2010, Cities and the Environment, V3, P1
   McCarthy MP, 2010, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V37, DOI 10.1029/2010GL042845
   McDowell N, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V178, P719, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02436.x
   McDowell NG, 2011, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V26, P523, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.003
   Meinke I., 2018, Hamburger Klimabericht - Wissen uber Klima, Klimawandel und Auswirkungen in Hamburg und Norddeutschland, P15, DOI [10.1007/978-3-662-55379-4_2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-55379-4_2]
   Morgenroth J, 2013, ECOL ENG, V51, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.041
   Moser A, 2017, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V61, P1095, DOI 10.1007/s00484-016-1290-0
   Moser A, 2016, FORESTS, V7, DOI 10.3390/f7030071
   Nielsen Christian N., 2007, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, V33, P231
   Nowak David J., 2004, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V2, P139, DOI 10.1078/1618-8667-00030
   Paton E, 2021, HYDROL WASSERBEWIRTS, V65, P5, DOI 10.5675/HyWa_2021.1_1
   Puhlmann H, 2019, ECOL STUD-ANAL SYNTH, V237, P55, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-15734-0_3
   Rahman MA, 2011, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V10, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.05.003
   Rahman MA, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127223
   Rahman MA, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V114, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.013
   Rahman MA, 2017, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V232, P443, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.10.006
   RCoreTeam, 2022, LANGUAGEANDENVIRONME
   Rhee J, 2017, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V237, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.02.011
   Rötzer T, 2017, PLANT SOIL, V418, P337, DOI 10.1007/s11104-017-3306-x
   Roloff A, 2009, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V8, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.08.002
   Roloff Andreas., 2013, BAUMEINDERSTADTBESON, P1
   Roman LA, 2014, URBAN ECOSYST, V17, P387, DOI 10.1007/s11252-013-0320-5
   Schaffitel A, 2020, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V12, P501, DOI 10.5194/essd-12-501-2020
   Scharenbroch BC, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V27, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.08.017
   Scharnweber T, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab865d
   Schlünzen KH, 2010, INT J CLIMATOL, V30, P1121, DOI 10.1002/joc.1968
   Schmidt-Walter P, 2019, ANN FOREST SCI, V76, DOI 10.1007/s13595-019-0822-2
   Schuldt B, 2020, BASIC APPL ECOL, V45, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2020.04.003
   Schulze Ernst-Detlef, 2019, PLANTECOLOGY
   Schwarz J, 2020, CURR FOR REP, V6, P185, DOI 10.1007/s40725-020-00119-2
   Shock CC, 1998, IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION TECHNICAL CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, P139
   Sjöman H, 2018, URBAN ECOSYST, V21, P1171, DOI 10.1007/s11252-018-0791-5
   Sjöman H, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P858, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.08.004
   Sjöman H, 2010, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V9, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2010.04.001
   Smiley E. Thomas, 2006, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, V32, P164
   Stratópoulos LMF, 2019, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V63, P197, DOI 10.1007/s00484-018-1653-9
   Stratópoulos LMF, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V30, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.011
   The Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD), Geoportal DWD
   Thomsen S, 2020, URBAN ECOSYST, V23, P173, DOI 10.1007/s11252-019-00908-z
   Trusilova Kristina, 2015, KLIMAUNTERSUCHUNGFUR, V247
   Vicente-Serrano SM, 2010, J CLIMATE, V23, P1696, DOI 10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1
   von Storch H., 2018, HAMBURGER KLIMABERIC, V1st, DOI [10.1007/978-3-662-55379-4, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-55379-4]
   Watson WT, 2005, HORTTECHNOLOGY, V15, P118, DOI 10.21273/HORTTECH.15.1.0118
   Wessolek Gerd, 2011, PERSPECTIVESINURBANE
   Wiesner S, 2016, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V16, P2523, DOI 10.1007/s11368-016-1385-6
   Yang JL, 2011, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V11, P751, DOI 10.1007/s11368-011-0356-1
   Zink M, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074002
NR 87
TC 11
Z9 14
U1 4
U2 31
PU ELSEVIER GMBH
PI MUNICH
PA HACKERBRUCKE 6, 80335 MUNICH, GERMANY
SN 1618-8667
EI 1610-8167
J9 URBAN FOR URBAN GREE
JI Urban For. Urban Green.
PD SEP
PY 2022
VL 75
AR 127692
DI 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127692
EA AUG 2022
PG 13
WC Plant Sciences; Environmental Studies; Forestry; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Plant Sciences; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry; Urban
   Studies
GA 3Y6QO
UT WOS:000843848000001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Cheng, SH
   Costedoat, S
   Sterling, EJ
   Chamberlain, C
   Jagadish, A
   Lichtenthal, P
   Nowakowski, AJ
   Taylor, A
   Tinsman, J
   Canty, SWJ
   Holland, MB
   Jones, KW
   Mills, M
   Morales-Hidalgo, D
   Sprenkle-Hyppolite, S
   Wiggins, M
   Mascia, MB
   Brenes, CLM
AF Cheng, Samantha H.
   Costedoat, Sebastien
   Sterling, Eleanor J.
   Chamberlain, Catherine
   Jagadish, Arundhati
   Lichtenthal, Peter
   Nowakowski, A. Justin
   Taylor, Auset
   Tinsman, Jen
   Canty, Steven W. J.
   Holland, Margaret B.
   Jones, Kelly W.
   Mills, Morena
   Morales-Hidalgo, David
   Sprenkle-Hyppolite, Starry
   Wiggins, Meredith
   Mascia, Michael B.
   Brenes, Carlos L. Munoz
TI What evidence exists on the links between natural climate solutions and
   climate change mitigation outcomes in subtropical and tropical
   terrestrial regions? A systematic map protocol
SO ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Natural climate solutions; Climate change; Nature-based solutions;
   Mitigation; Land cover and land use change; Conservation; Restoration;
   Land management
ID SERVICES; ACCESS
AB Background: Natural climate solutions (NCS)-actions to conserve, restore, and modify natural and modified ecosystems to increase carbon storage or avoid greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions-are increasingly regarded as important pathways for climate change mitigation, while contributing to our global conservation efforts, overall planetary resilience, and sustainable development goals. Recently, projections posit that terrestrial-based NCS can potentially capture or avoid the emission of at least 11 Gt (gigatons) of carbon dioxide equivalent a year, or roughly encompassing one third of the emissions reductions needed to meet the Paris Climate Agreement goals by 2030. NCS interventions also purport to provide co-benefits such as improved productivity and livelihoods from sustainable natural resource management, protection of locally and culturally important natural areas, and downstream climate adaptation benefits. Attention on implementing NCS to address climate change across global and national agendas has grown-however, clear understanding of which types of NCS interventions have undergone substantial study versus those that require additional evidence is still lacking. This study aims to conduct a systematic map to collate and describe the current state, distribution, and methods used for evidence on the links between NCS interventions and climate change mitigation outcomes within tropical and sub-tropical terrestrial ecosystems. Results of this study can be used to inform program and policy design and highlight critical knowledge gaps where future evaluation, research, and syntheses are needed.
   Methods: To develop this systematic map, we will search two bibliographic databases (including 11 indices) and 67 organization websites, backward citation chase from 39 existing evidence syntheses, and solicit information from key informants. All searches will be conducted in English and encompass subtropical and tropical terrestrial ecosystems (forests, grasslands, mangroves, agricultural areas). Search results will be screened at title and abstract, and full text levels, recording both the number of excluded articles and reasons for exclusion. Key meta-data from included articles will be coded and reported in a narrative review that will summarize trends in the evidence base, assess gaps in knowledge, and provide insights for policy, practice, and research. The data from this systematic map will be made open access.
C1 [Cheng, Samantha H.; Sterling, Eleanor J.; Taylor, Auset; Tinsman, Jen] Amer Museum Nat Hist, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat, New York, NY 10024 USA.
   [Costedoat, Sebastien; Chamberlain, Catherine; Jagadish, Arundhati; Nowakowski, A. Justin; Mascia, Michael B.; Brenes, Carlos L. Munoz] Conservat Int, Moore Ctr Sci, Arlington, VA 22202 USA.
   [Lichtenthal, Peter] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA.
   [Nowakowski, A. Justin; Canty, Steven W. J.] Smithsonian Inst, Conservat Commons, Working Land & Seascapes, Washington, DC 20560 USA.
   [Canty, Steven W. J.] Smithsonian Marine Stn, Ft Pierce, FL USA.
   [Holland, Margaret B.] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Dept Geog & Environm Syst, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA.
   [Jones, Kelly W.] Colorado State Univ, Human Dimens Nat Resources Dept, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA.
   [Mills, Morena] Imperial Coll London, London, England.
   [Morales-Hidalgo, David] Food & Agr Org United Nations, Forestry Div, Rome, Italy.
   [Sprenkle-Hyppolite, Starry] Conservat Int Arlington, Ctr Nat Climate Solut, Arlington, VA USA.
   [Wiggins, Meredith] DAI, Washington, DC USA.
C3 American Museum of Natural History (AMNH); Conservation International;
   Columbia University; Smithsonian Institution; Smithsonian Institution;
   Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History; University System of
   Maryland; University of Maryland Baltimore County; Colorado State
   University; Imperial College London; Food & Agriculture Organization of
   the United Nations (FAO); Conservation International
RP Cheng, SH (corresponding author), Amer Museum Nat Hist, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat, New York, NY 10024 USA.; Brenes, CLM (corresponding author), Conservat Int, Moore Ctr Sci, Arlington, VA 22202 USA.
EM scheng@amnh.org; cmunoz@conservation.org
RI Sterling, Eleanor/AGK-8469-2022; Mascia, Michael/X-5516-2018; Costedoat,
   Sébastien/J-1483-2019; Brenes, Carlos/X-7661-2018; Jagadish,
   Arundhati/Q-3933-2019; Chamberlain, Catherine/A-4218-2013; Lichtenthal,
   Peter/KDN-0453-2024; Mills, Morena/AAD-8916-2019
OI Cheng, Samantha/0000-0003-1799-6310; Tinsman, Jen/0000-0003-2452-4573;
   Costedoat, Sebastien/0000-0002-9496-4542; Canty,
   Steven/0000-0001-9927-7736
FU Patrick J. McGovern Foundation
FX We thank the Patrick J. McGovern Foundation for support.
CR Allen M. R., 2018, GLOBAL WARMING 15C I
   Amano T, 2021, PLOS BIOL, V19, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001296
   [Anonymous], 2002, DRAMA COMMONS
   [Anonymous], 2019, NATURE BASED SOLUTIO
   Ayiku L, 2020, RES SYNTH METHODS, V11, P669, DOI 10.1002/jrsm.1431
   Battin TJ, 2009, NAT GEOSCI, V2, P598, DOI 10.1038/ngeo618
   Berrang-Ford L, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, P989, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-01170-y
   Bindoff N. L., 2019, IPCC SPECIAL REPORT, P447
   Bossio DA, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P391, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-0491-z
   Bottrill M, 2014, ENVIRON EVID, V3, DOI 10.1186/2047-2382-3-16
   Brooks WR, 2020, ENVIRON EVID, V9, DOI 10.1186/s13750-020-00193-w
   Catalano AS, 2019, BIOL CONSERV, V238, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108223
   Chambers JM, 2022, WORLD DEV, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105723
   Chancellor W, 2021, FOOD POLICY, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102091
   Chausson A, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P6134, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15310
   Cheng SH, 2019, ENVIRON EVID, V8, DOI 10.1186/s13750-019-0148-4
   Cohen-Shacham E, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V98, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.014
   Crouzeilles R, 2017, SCI ADV, V3, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1701345
   Dinerstein E, 2017, BIOSCIENCE, V67, P534, DOI 10.1093/biosci/bix014
   Doswald N, 2014, CLIM DEV, V6, P185, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2013.867247
   Ellis PW, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V438, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.004
   Executive office of the president, 2021, Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad Executive Order
   Fleischman F, 2020, BIOSCIENCE, V70, P947, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biaa094
   Garnett ST, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P369, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6
   Glanville JM, 2006, J MED LIBR ASSOC, V94, P130
   Griscom BW, 2020, PHILOS T R SOC B, V375, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2019.0126
   Griscom BW, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P11645, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1710465114
   Hajjar R, 2021, NAT SUSTAIN, V4, P216, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-00633-y
   Hansen MC, 2019, SCIENCE, V363, DOI 10.1126/science.aar3629
   Hanson HI, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104302
   Henderson B, 2021, Policy Strategies and Challenges for Climate Change Mitigation in the Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) Sector
   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2021, AR6 Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis
   Jacquet J, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P643, DOI 10.1038/nclimate3006
   Jetz W, 2019, NAT ECOL EVOL, V3, P539, DOI 10.1038/s41559-019-0826-1
   Konno K, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V114, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.021
   Lal R, 2009, EUR J SOIL SCI, V60, P158, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01114.x
   Lal R, 2008, PHILOS T R SOC B, V363, P815, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2007.2185
   Lal R, 2014, INT SOIL WATER CONSE, V2, P36, DOI 10.1016/S2095-6339(15)30021-6
   Lambin E. F., 2008, Global effects of land use on local terres
   Mahajan SL, 2021, CONSERV SCI PRACT, V3, DOI 10.1111/csp2.299
   Mahanty S, 2013, LAND USE POLICY, V31, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.10.009
   McKinnon MC, 2016, ENVIRON EVID, V5, DOI 10.1186/s13750-016-0058-7
   Meyfroidt P, 2016, J LAND USE SCI, V11, P501, DOI 10.1080/1747423X.2015.1117530
   Miller DC, 2020, CAMPBELL SYST REV, V16, DOI 10.1002/cl2.1066
   O'Connell MJ., 2019, CAPACITY BUILDING CO
   O'Mara-Eves A, 2015, SYST REV-LONDON, V4, DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-4-5
   Pirard R, 2019, GREEN CLIM FUND
   Probst B, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P1019, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-0537-2
   Reid JL, 2018, SCI ADV, V4, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aas9143
   Robinson BE, 2018, CONSERV LETT, V11, DOI 10.1111/conl.12383
   Robinson BE, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.012
   Roe S, 2021, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V27, P6025, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15873
   Rosenstock T.S., 2016, SCI BASIS CLIMATE SM
   Rosenstock TS., 2019, The Climate-Smart Agriculture Papers, P141, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-92798-5_12, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-92798-5_12]
   Saran A, 2020, CAMPBELL SYST REV, V16, DOI 10.1002/cl2.1070
   Shimamoto CY, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0208523
   Smith P, 2019, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V44, P255, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033129
   Snilstveit B, 2016, LAND USE CHANGE FORE
   Tegegne YT, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10124841
   Tseng TWJ, 2021, NAT SUSTAIN, V4, P242, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-00648-5
   UN, 2021, Our Common Agenda-Report of the Secretary-General
   UNFCCC, 2016, MARR PARTN GLOB CLIM
   Valach AC, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0248398
   Veldman JW, 2019, SCIENCE, V366, DOI 10.1126/science.aay7976
   White H, 2020, CAMPBELL SYST REV, V16, DOI 10.1002/cl2.1125
   Wilczynski Nancy L, 2011, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, V2011, P1506
   Winkler K, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22702-2
   Wunder S, 2020, ANNU REV RESOUR ECON, V12, P209, DOI 10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094206
NR 68
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 2
U2 2
PU BMC
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND
EI 2047-2382
J9 ENVIRON EVID
JI Environ. Evid.
PD APR 19
PY 2022
VL 11
IS 1
AR 15
DI 10.1186/s13750-022-00268-w
PG 17
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 0Q5TT
UT WOS:000784981500003
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sinha, P
   Coville, RC
   Hirabayashi, S
   Lim, B
   Endreny, TA
   Nowak, DJ
AF Sinha, Paramita
   Coville, Robert C.
   Hirabayashi, Satoshi
   Lim, Brian
   Endreny, Theodore A.
   Nowak, David J.
TI Variation in estimates of heat-related mortality reduction due to tree
   cover in US cities
SO JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate adaptation planning; Decision-support tool; Economic valuation;
   Public health impacts; Ecosystem services; Modeling temperature changes
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; UNITED-STATES; CANOPY COVER; HUMAN HEALTH; URBAN;
   TEMPERATURE; QUALITY; STORAGE; GREEN; AREAS
AB Heat-related mortality is one of the leading causes of weather-related deaths in the United States. With changing climates and an aging population, effective adaptive strategies to address public health and environmental justice issues associated with extreme heat will be increasingly important. One effective adaptive strategy for reducing heat-related mortality is increasing tree cover. Designing such a strategy requires decision-support tools that provide spatial and temporal information about impacts. We apply such a tool to estimate spatially and temporally explicit reductions in temperature and mortality associated with a 10% increase in tree cover in 10 U. S. cities with varying climatic, demographic, and land cover conditions. Two heat metrics were applied to represent tree impacts on moderately and extremely hot days (relative to historical conditions). Increasing tree cover by 10% reduced estimated heat-related mortality in cities significantly, with total impacts generally greatest in the most populated cities. Mortality reductions vary widely across cities, ranging from approximately 50 fewer deaths in Salt Lake City to about 3800 fewer deaths in New York City. This variation is due to differences in demographics, land cover, and local climatic conditions. In terms of per capita estimated impacts, hotter and drier cities experience higher percentage reductions in mortality due to increased tree cover across the season. Phoenix potentially benefits the most from increased tree cover, with an estimated 22% reduction in mortality from baseline levels. In cooler cities such as Minneapolis, trees can reduce mortality significantly on days that are extremely hot relative to historical conditions and therefore help mitigate impacts during heat wave conditions. Recent studies project highest increases in heat-related mortality in the cooler cities, so our findings have important implications for adaptation planning. Our estimated spatial and temporal distributions of mortality reductions for each city provide crucial information needed for promoting environmental justice and equity. More broadly, the methods and model can be applied by both urban planners and the public health community for designing targeted, effective policies to reduce heat-related mortality. Additionally, land use managers can use this information to optimize tree plantings. Public stakeholders can also use these impact estimates for advocacy.
C1 [Sinha, Paramita; Lim, Brian] RTI Int, 3040 E Cornwallis Rd, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA.
   [Coville, Robert C.; Hirabayashi, Satoshi] SUNY ESF, US Forest Serv, USDA, Davey Tree Expert Co,Davey Inst, 5 Moon Lib, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA.
   [Endreny, Theodore A.] SUNY ESF, Dept Environm Resources Engn, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA.
   [Nowak, David J.] SUNY ESF, US Forest Serv, USDA, 5 Moon Lib, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA.
C3 Research Triangle Institute; State University of New York (SUNY) System;
   State University of New York (SUNY) College of Environmental Science &
   Forestry; United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); United States
   Forest Service; State University of New York (SUNY) System; State
   University of New York (SUNY) College of Environmental Science &
   Forestry; State University of New York (SUNY) System; State University
   of New York (SUNY) College of Environmental Science & Forestry; United
   States Department of Agriculture (USDA); United States Forest Service
RP Sinha, P (corresponding author), RTI Int, 3040 E Cornwallis Rd, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA.
EM psinha@rti.org
RI Endreny, Theodore/H-4743-2019; Hirabayashi, Satoshi/AAC-3078-2019
OI Lim, Brian/0000-0003-1664-1462; Endreny, Theodore/0000-0002-1891-261X;
   Coville, Robert/0000-0002-6895-2564; sinha,
   paramita/0000-0001-5667-9428; Hirabayashi, Satoshi/0000-0003-4259-2748
CR Albouy D, 2016, J ASSOC ENVIRON RESO, V3, P205, DOI 10.1086/684573
   Anderson GB, 2011, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V119, P210, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1002313
   [Anonymous], 2015, UND CAUS DEATH 1999
   [Anonymous], 2015, National Land Cover Database 2006; Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium. Available at
   Baccini M, 2008, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V19, P711, DOI 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318176bfcd
   Burkart K, 2016, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V124, P927, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1409529
   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Center for Environmental Health., 2020, CDCS TRACK NETW ACT
   City of Phoenix, 2021, PHOEN CLIM ACT PLAN
   Crimmins AllisonJ., 2016, IMPACTS CLIMATE CHAN
   Davis RE, 2003, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V111, P1712, DOI 10.1289/ehp.6336
   Donovan GH, 2013, AM J PREV MED, V44, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.066
   ECC, 2012, INT EN CONS COD IECC
   Gamble J. L, 2016, U.S. Global Change Research Program, P247, DOI [10.7930/J0Q81B0T, DOI 10.7930/J0Q81B0T]
   Gasparrini A, 2015, LANCET, V386, P369, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62114-0
   Gasparrini A, 2017, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V1, pE360, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30156-0
   Gerrish E, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V170, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.005
   Graham DA, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V20, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.08.005
   Grimmond CSB, 1999, J APPL METEOROL, V38, P922, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<0922:HSIUAL>2.0.CO;2
   Hayhoe K, 2010, J GREAT LAKES RES, V36, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.jglr.2009.12.009
   Hirabayashi S., 2016, Surface and Upper Weather Pre processor for i Tree Eco and Hydro
   i-Tree Database, 2020, LOC DAT I TREE SUIT
   Kaiser Reinhard, 2007, Am J Public Health, V97 Suppl 1, pS158, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2006.100081
   Kalkstein LS, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V56, P113, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9552-3
   Kondo MC, 2020, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V4, pE149, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30058-9
   Lee M, 2014, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V13, DOI 10.1186/1476-069X-13-89
   Luber G, 2008, AM J PREV MED, V35, P429, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.021
   McDonald RI, 2020, ECOSYSTEMS, V23, P137, DOI 10.1007/s10021-019-00395-5
   McPherson E.G., 1999, CARBON DIOXIDE REDUC
   Medina-Ramón M, 2007, OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V64, P827, DOI 10.1136/oem.2007.033175
   Medina-Ramón M, 2006, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V114, P1331, DOI 10.1289/ehp.9074
   Nowak DJ, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V21, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.12.004
   Nowak DJ, 2014, ENVIRON POLLUT, V193, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.05.028
   Nowak DJ, 2013, ENVIRON POLLUT, V178, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.050
   Nowak DJ, 2013, ENVIRON POLLUT, V178, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.019
   Nowak DJ, 2010, ENVIRON MANAGE, V46, P378, DOI 10.1007/s00267-010-9536-9
   Nowak David J., 2008, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, V34, P347
   Sacks JD, 2018, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V104, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.02.009
   safavi N., 2012, SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP
   Santamouris M, 2020, ENERG BUILDINGS, V217, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110002
   Sarofim M.C., 2016, The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment, P43, DOI [DOI 10.7930/J0MG7MDX, 10.7930/J0MG7MDX]
   Schwartz JD, 2015, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V14, DOI 10.1186/s12940-015-0071-2
   Shandas V, 2019, CLIMATE, V7, DOI 10.3390/cli7010005
   Shindell D, 2020, GEOHEALTH, V4, DOI 10.1029/2019GH000234
   Sinha P, 2021, ECOL MODEL, V449, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109553
   Sinha P, 2018, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V92, P608, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.08.005
   Smith TT, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V118, P811, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0659-2
   Smith VK, 2002, LAND ECON, V78, P132, DOI 10.2307/3146928
   U .S. Bureau of Labour Statistics, CPI INFL CALC
   U.S. Climate Data, 2021, CLIM FARG N DAK
   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2018, MORT RISK VAL
   Vaidyanathan A, 2020, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V69, P729, DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm6924a1
   Venter ZS, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V709, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136193
   Voelkel J, 2017, CLIMATE, V5, DOI 10.3390/cli5020041
   Voorhees AS, 2011, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V45, P1450, DOI 10.1021/es102820y
   Weinberger KR, 2020, ENVIRON EPIDEMIOL, V4, DOI 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000096
   Wen M, 2013, ANN BEHAV MED, V45, pS18, DOI 10.1007/s12160-012-9426-x
   Yang Y, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V118, P10449, DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50803
   Ziter CD, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P7575, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1817561116
NR 58
TC 16
Z9 18
U1 1
U2 35
PU ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI LONDON
PA 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON NW1 7DX, ENGLAND
SN 0301-4797
EI 1095-8630
J9 J ENVIRON MANAGE
JI J. Environ. Manage.
PD JAN 1
PY 2022
VL 301
AR 113751
DI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113751
EA OCT 2021
PG 13
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA WM6SX
UT WOS:000711214300002
PM 34628283
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Maskell, G
   Chemura, A
   Nguyen, H
   Gornott, C
   Mondal, P
AF Maskell, Gina
   Chemura, Abel
   Nguyen, Huong
   Gornott, Christoph
   Mondal, Pinki
TI Integration of Sentinel optical and radar data for mapping smallholder
   coffee production systems in Vietnam
SO REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Agroforestry; Smallholder agriculture; Crop mask; Sentinel-1;
   Sentinel-2; Data fusion; Google Earth Engine; Random forest
ID CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; SATELLITE IMAGERY; CENTRAL HIGHLANDS;
   CLIMATE-CHANGE; LANDSAT; FOREST; CROPS; PLANTATIONS; VARIABILITY;
   EXPANSION
AB Perennial commodity crops, such as coffee, often play a large role globally in agricultural markets and supply chains and locally in livelihoods, poverty reduction, and biodiversity. Yet, the production of spatial information on these crops are often overlooked in favor of annual food crops. Remote sensing detection of coffee faces a particular set of challenges due to persistent cloud cover in the tropical "coffee belt," hilly topography in coffee growing regions, diversity of coffee growing systems, and spectral similarity to other tree crops and agricultural land. Looking at the major coffee growing region in Dak Lak, Vietnam, we integrate multi-temporal 10 m optical Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-1 SAR data in order to map three coffee production systems: i) open-canopy sun coffee, ii) intercropped and other shaded coffee and iii) newly planted or young coffee. Leveraging Google Earth Engine (GEE), we compute five sets of features in order to best enhance separability between coffee and other land cover and within coffee production systems. The features include Sentinel-2 dry and wet season composites, Sentinel-1 texture features, Sentinel-1 spatiotemporal metrics, and topographic features. Using a random forest classification algorithm, we produce a 9-class land cover map including our three coffee production classes and a binary coffee/non-coffee map. The binary map has an overall accuracy of 89% and the three coffee production systems have user accuracies of 65, 56, 71% for sun coffee, intercropped coffee and newly planted coffee, respectively. This is a first effort at large-scale distinction of within-crop production styles and has implications across many applications. The binary coffee map can be used as a high-resolution crop mask, whereas the detailed land cover map can inform monitoring of deforestation dynamics, biodiversity, sustainability certification and implementation of climate adaptation strategies. This work offers a scalable approach to integrating optical and radar Sentinel data for production of spatially explicit agricultural infor-mation and contributes particularly to tree crop and agroforestry mapping, which often is overlooked in between agricultural and forestry sciences.
C1 [Maskell, Gina; Chemura, Abel; Gornott, Christoph] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, Potsdam, Germany.
   [Maskell, Gina; Chemura, Abel; Gornott, Christoph] Leibniz Assoc, Potsdam, Germany.
   [Nguyen, Huong] Tay Nguyen Univ, Dept Forest Resource & Environm Management FREM, Buon Ma Thuot, Dak Lak Provinc, Vietnam.
   [Gornott, Christoph] Univ Kassel, Dept Agroecosyst Anal & Modelling, Kassel, Germany.
   [Mondal, Pinki] Univ Delaware, Dept Geog & Spatial Sci, Newark, DE USA.
   [Mondal, Pinki] Univ Delaware, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Newark, DE 19717 USA.
C3 Potsdam Institut fur Klimafolgenforschung; Tay Nguyen University;
   Universitat Kassel; University of Delaware; University of Delaware
RP Maskell, G (corresponding author), Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, POB 60 12 03, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany.
EM maskell@pik-potsdam.de
RI Gornott, Christoph/ABI-8107-2020; Mondal, Pinki/AFU-2382-2022; Nguyễn,
   Hương/JUV-6128-2023; Chemura, Abel/H-3263-2019
OI Mondal, Pinki/0000-0002-7323-6335
FU University of Delaware Research Foundation - Berlin-Potsdam Research
   Network Geo.X
FX We are grateful to Pamela D. McElwee, Sonali Shukla McDermid, Tran Huu
   Nghi and Nguyen Thi Quynh Thu and colleagues at Tropenbos International
   for their input during the initial development of this research. This
   research is funded by a University of Delaware Research Foundation grant
   awarded to PM. GM's doctoral research is funded by the Berlin-Potsdam
   Research Network Geo.X.
CR Agergaard J, 2009, GEOGR J, V175, P133, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2009.00320.x
   Ortega-Huerta MA, 2012, INT J REMOTE SENS, V33, P220, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2011.591442
   Amarasinghe UA, 2015, AGR SYST, V136, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.02.008
   [Anonymous], 2021, Copernicus: Sentinel-3. Copernicus: Sentinel-3 - Global Sea/Land Monitoring Mission including Altimetry
   Assefa A., 2019, INT J HORTIC, V3, P31, DOI [10.20431/2454-9487.0503004, DOI 10.20431/2454-9487.0503004]
   Belgiu M, 2016, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V114, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011
   Bey A, 2020, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V239, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111611
   Bey A, 2016, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/rs8100807
   Blaes X, 2016, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/rs8060531
   Bourgoin C, 2020, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2019.101958
   Brandt J., 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V18
   Breiman L., 2001, Machine Learning, V45, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Breunig FM, 2020, REMOTE SENS APPL, V19, DOI 10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100325
   Burnett MW, 2019, INT J REMOTE SENS, V40, P7329, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2019.1594440
   Byrareddy V, 2020, AGR WATER MANAGE, V241, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106350
   Chemura A, 2017, GEOCARTO INT, V32, P759, DOI 10.1080/10106049.2016.1178812
   Chemura A, 2017, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V57, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2016.12.007
   Clerici N, 2017, J MAPS, V13, P718, DOI 10.1080/17445647.2017.1372316
   Cordero-Sancho S, 2007, INT J REMOTE SENS, V28, P1577, DOI 10.1080/01431160600887680
   DaMatta Fábio M., 2007, Braz. J. Plant Physiol., V19, P485, DOI 10.1590/S1677-04202007000400014
   Dawson IK, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V333, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.021
   De Beenhouwer M, 2013, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V175, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2013.05.003
   de Carvalho AF, 2021, AGROFOREST SYST, V95, P119, DOI 10.1007/s10457-020-00567-6
   Defourny P, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V221, P551, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.007
   Denize J, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11010037
   Farr TG, 2007, REV GEOPHYS, V45, DOI 10.1029/2005RG000183
   Fridell G, 2014, THIRD WORLD Q, V35, P1179, DOI 10.1080/01436597.2014.926108
   Friedl M., 2015, NASA EOSDIS land processes distributed active archive center, DOI [DOI 10.5067/MODIS/MCD12C1.006, 10.5067/MODIS/MCD12C1.006]
   Fritz S, 2011, ENVIRON RES LETT, V6, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044005
   Gaertner J, 2017, J APPL REMOTE SENS, V11, DOI 10.1117/1.JRS.11.046005
   Gao T, 2015, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V7, P1702, DOI 10.3390/rs70201702
   Gomez C, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P2731, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2010.06.007
   Gorelick N, 2017, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V202, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
   Griffiths P, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V220, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2018.10.031
   Grogan K, 2015, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V169, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2015.03.001
   Ha DT, 2008, REV DEV ECON, V12, P312, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2007.00391.x
   Ha PT, 2020, INT J CLIMATOL, V40, P3072, DOI 10.1002/joc.6383
   HARALICK RM, 1973, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, VSMC3, P610, DOI 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314
   Hebbar R, 2019, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMME, VXLII-3/W6, P293, DOI [10.5194/isprs, 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W6-293-2019]
   Hengl T, 2018, PEERJ, V6, DOI 10.7717/peerj.5518
   Housman IW, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10081184
   Hu LJ, 2018, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V73, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2018.04.001
   Hunt DA, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12122041
   Hurni K, 2018, J LAND USE SCI, V13, P198, DOI [10.1080/1747423X.2018.1499830, 10.1080/1747423x.2018.1499830]
   Inglada J, 2015, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V7, P12356, DOI 10.3390/rs70912356
   Jain M, 2013, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V134, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.029
   Jezeer RE, 2019, ECOSYST SERV, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101033
   Jin ZN, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V228, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.016
   Kath J, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P3677, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15097
   Kawakubo FS, 2016, INT J REMOTE SENS, V37, P3414, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2016.1201226
   Kelley LC, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10060952
   Läderach P, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V141, P47, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1788-9
   Leakey RRB, 2017, MULTIFUNCTIONAL AGRICULTURE: ACHIEVING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA, P123, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-805356-0.00013-1
   Liu P, 2019, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V8, DOI 10.3390/ijgi8020086
   Mercier A, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11080979
   Meyfroidt P, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1187, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.005
   Mishra VN, 2019, EARTH SCI INFORM, V12, P71, DOI 10.1007/s12145-018-0369-z
   Monfreda C, 2008, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V22, DOI 10.1029/2007GB002947
   Mueller H, 2015, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V156, P490, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.014
   Mukashema A, 2014, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V33, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2014.05.005
   Müller D, 2002, AGR ECON, V27, P333, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00124.x
   Nesper M, 2017, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V247, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.024
   Anh NH, 2019, ECONOMIES, V7, DOI 10.3390/economies7030066
   Nguyen M.D., 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, DOI [10.20944/preprints201910.0275.v1, DOI 10.20944/PREPRINTS201910.0275.V1]
   Nogueira SMC, 2018, ENG AGR-JABOTICABAL, V38, P387, DOI [10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v38n3p387-394/2018, 10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v38n3p387-394/2018]
   Nomura K, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10111693
   Numbisi FN, 2019, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V8, DOI 10.3390/ijgi8040179
   O'Brien RM, 2007, QUAL QUANT, V41, P673, DOI 10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
   Oon A, 2019, REMOTE SENS APPL, V13, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.rsase.2018.11.002
   Padovan MP, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V248, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.08.036
   Pflugmacher D, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V221, P583, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.001
   Pham Y, 2020, CLIM RISK MANAG, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2020.100255
   Pham Y, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V156, P609, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02538-y
   Duong PC, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10091406
   Pontius RG, 2011, INT J REMOTE SENS, V32, P4407, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2011.552923
   Poortinga A, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11070831
   Qadir A, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12030522
   Schmitt M., 2019, ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sens. Spatial Inform. Sci., P145, DOI [10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W7-145-2019, DOI 10.5194/ISPRS-ANNALS-IV-2-W7-145-2019]
   Scorneti Erwan, 2017, ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys, V60, P144, DOI 10.1051/proc/201760144
   See LD, 2015, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V4, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2014.10.004
   Siebert SF, 2002, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V11, P1889, DOI 10.1023/A:1020804611740
   Spracklen B, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13020185
   Sun CL, 2019, SENSORS-BASEL, V19, DOI 10.3390/s19102401
   Thi T.P., 2014, World J. Agric. Res, V2, P205, DOI [10.12691/wjar-2-5-2, DOI 10.12691/WJAR-2-5-2]
   Torbick N, 2016, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/rs8030236
   Tsai DM, 2017, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V135, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2016.12.020
   Waldner F, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V233, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111375
   Widayati A., 2003, APPL COMBINED PIXEL
NR 88
TC 21
Z9 23
U1 20
U2 157
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
PI NEW YORK
PA STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA
SN 0034-4257
EI 1879-0704
J9 REMOTE SENS ENVIRON
JI Remote Sens. Environ.
PD DEC 1
PY 2021
VL 266
AR 112709
DI 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112709
EA SEP 2021
PG 16
WC Environmental Sciences; Remote Sensing; Imaging Science & Photographic
   Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Remote Sensing; Imaging Science &
   Photographic Technology
GA WA6IU
UT WOS:000702988300005
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Godinho, RM
   O'Higgins, P
AF Godinho, Ricardo Miguel
   O'Higgins, Paul
TI The biomechanical significance of the frontal sinus in Kabwe 1 (<i>Homo
   heidelbergensis</i>)
SO JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Human evolution; Cranial form; Finite element analysis; Facial
   biomechanics; Palaeoanthropology
ID FINITE-ELEMENT MODEL; PARANASAL SINUSES; MAXILLARY SINUS; BONE MASS;
   COLD ADAPTATION; NASAL CAVITY; GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS; FEEDING
   BIOMECHANICS; CLIMATIC ADAPTATION; SUPRAORBITAL TORUS
AB Paranasal sinuses are highly variable among living and fossil hominins and their function(s) are poorly understood. It has been argued they serve no particular function and are biological 'spandrels' arising as a structural consequence of changes in associated bones and/or soft tissue structures. In contrast, others have suggested that sinuses have one or more functions, in olfaction, respiration, thermoregulation, nitric oxide production, voice resonance, reduction of skull weight, and craniofacial biomechanics. Here we assess the extent to which the very large frontal sinus of Kabwe 1 impacts on the mechanical performance of the craniofacial skeleton during biting. It may be that the browridge is large and the sinus has large trabecular struts traversing it to compensate for the effect of a large sinus on the ability of the face to resist forces arising from biting. Alternatively, the large sinus may have no impact and be sited where strains that arise from biting would be very low. If the former is true, then infilling of the sinus would be expected to increase the ability of the skeleton to resist biting loads, while removing the struts might have the opposite effect. To these ends, finite element models with hollowed and infilled variants of the original sinus were created and loaded to simulate different bites. The deformations arising due to loading were then compared among different models and bites by contrasting the strain vectors arising during identical biting tasks. It was found that the frontal bone experiences very low strains and that infilling or hollowing of the sinus has little effect on strains over the cranial surface, with small effects over the frontal bone. The material used to infill the sinus experienced very low strains. This is consistent with the idea that frontal sinus morphogenesis is influenced by the strain field experienced by this region such that it comes to lie entirely within a region of the cranium that would otherwise experience low strains. This has implications for understanding why sinuses vary among hominin fossils. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Godinho, Ricardo Miguel; O'Higgins, Paul] Univ York, Dept Archaeol, York Y01 7EP, N Yorkshire, England.
   [Godinho, Ricardo Miguel; O'Higgins, Paul] Univ York, Hull York Med Sch, John Hughlings Jackson Bldg, York Y010 5DD, N Yorkshire, England.
   [Godinho, Ricardo Miguel] Univ Algarve, Fac Ciencias Humanas & Sociais, Interdisciplinary Ctr Archaeol & Evolut Human Beh, Campus Gambelas, P-8005139 Faro, Portugal.
C3 University of York - UK; University of Hull; University of York - UK;
   Universidade do Algarve
RP Godinho, RM (corresponding author), Univ York, Dept Archaeol, York Y01 7EP, N Yorkshire, England.; Godinho, RM (corresponding author), Univ York, Hull York Med Sch, John Hughlings Jackson Bldg, York Y010 5DD, N Yorkshire, England.; Godinho, RM (corresponding author), Univ Algarve, Fac Ciencias Humanas & Sociais, Interdisciplinary Ctr Archaeol & Evolut Human Beh, Campus Gambelas, P-8005139 Faro, Portugal.
EM ricardomiguelgodinho@gmail.com
RI ; Godinho, Ricardo Miguel/P-2263-2015
OI O'Higgins, Paul/0000-0002-9797-0809; Godinho, Ricardo
   Miguel/0000-0003-0107-9577
FU Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT)
   [SFRH/BD/76375/2011]; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
   [SFRH/BD/76375/2011] Funding Source: FCT
FX Ricardo Miguel Godinho is funded by the Portuguese Foundation for
   Science and Technology (FCT; Ph.D. funding reference:
   SFRH/BD/76375/2011).
CR [Anonymous], 2014, AUSTRALOPITHECINE FA
   BLANEY SPA, 1990, J LARYNGOL OTOL, V104, P690, DOI 10.1017/S0022215100113635
   Bookstein F, 1999, ANAT RECORD, V257, P217, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19991215)257:6<217::AID-AR7>3.0.CO;2-W
   BUCKLANDWRIGHT JC, 1970, MAN, V5, P512, DOI 10.2307/2798956
   Butaric LN, 2016, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V160, P483, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.22986
   Butaric LN, 2015, ANAT REC, V298, P1710, DOI 10.1002/ar.23182
   Campbell R, 1999, PERCEPTION, V28, P489, DOI 10.1068/p2784
   Cave AJE, 1940, J ANAT, V74, P493
   Churchill SE, 1998, EVOL ANTHROPOL, V7, P46, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1998)7:2<46::AID-EVAN2>3.0.CO;2-N
   Cieri RL, 2014, CURR ANTHROPOL, V55, P419, DOI 10.1086/677209
   Coon CarletonS., 1962, ORIGIN RACES
   Currey J.D., 2006, Bones: structure and mechanics
   DECHOW PC, 1993, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V90, P291, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330900304
   DUTERLOO HS, 1970, AM J ANAT, V127, P357, DOI 10.1002/aja.1001270403
   Ekman P., 1979, Human ethology, P169, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-2783-33
   Enlow DH., 1996, Essentials of Facial Growth.
   Enlow DH., 1968, The human face: an account of the postnatal growth and development of the craniofacial skeleton
   Fagan MJ, 2007, J MORPHOL, V268, P1071
   Fatu C, 2006, ANN ANAT, V188, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.aanat.2005.11.012
   Fitton LC, 2015, ANAT REC, V298, P107, DOI 10.1002/ar.23075
   FROST HM, 1987, ANAT RECORD, V219, P1, DOI 10.1002/ar.1092190104
   Frost HM, 1996, ANAT RECORD, V244, P139, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199602)244:2<139::AID-AR1>3.0.CO;2-X
   Frost HM, 2003, ANAT REC PART A, V275A, P1081, DOI 10.1002/ar.a.10119
   Godinho R. M., 2017, Human remains - Another Dimension: The Application of 3D Imaging in Funerary Context, P135
   Goodship AE, 1998, ACTA ASTRONAUT, V43, P65, DOI 10.1016/S0094-5765(98)00144-1
   GREENE DL, 1973, MAN, V8, P471, DOI 10.2307/2800322
   HILLAM RA, 1995, J BONE MINER RES, V10, pS443
   Holliday TW, 1997, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V104, P245, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199710)104:2<245::AID-AJPA10>3.0.CO;2-#
   Holton N, 2013, ANAT REC, V296, P414, DOI 10.1002/ar.22655
   Holton NE, 2011, J HUM EVOL, V61, P624, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.08.001
   Hutton DavidV., 2003, FUNDAMENTALS FINITE
   HYLANDER WL, 1991, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V86, P1, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330860102
   Hylander WL, 2001, ADV PRIMATO, P43
   Ito T, 2015, PRIMATES, V56, P11, DOI 10.1007/s10329-014-0440-4
   JONES HH, 1977, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V59, P204, DOI 10.2106/00004623-197759020-00012
   KANNUS P, 1995, ANN INTERN MED, V123, P27, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-123-1-199507010-00003
   Kerr D, 1996, J BONE MINER RES, V11, P218
   KOERTVELYESSY T, 1972, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V37, P161, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330370202
   Kupczik K, 2009, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V139, P193, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.20972
   Laitman JT, 2008, ANAT REC, V291, P1346, DOI 10.1002/ar.20788
   Laitman JT, 1996, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V93, P10543, DOI 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10543
   Ledogar JA, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms10596
   Lesne A., 2011, MORPHOGENESIS ORIGIN, P1
   Lieberman Daniel E., 2000, P85
   Lieberman DE., 2011, EVOLUTION HUMAN HEAD
   Lundberg JO, 2008, ANAT REC, V291, P1479, DOI 10.1002/ar.20782
   Márquez S, 2008, ANAT REC, V291, P1350, DOI 10.1002/ar.20791
   MOSS ML, 1960, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V18, P281, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330180406
   Noback ML, 2016, J HUM EVOL, V97, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.06.003
   Nordstrom P, 1996, BONE, V19, P189, DOI 10.1016/8756-3282(96)00163-9
   O'Higgins P, 2000, J ANAT, V197, P103, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19710103.x
   O'Higgins P., 2006, Int Congr Ser, V1296, P55, DOI [10.1016/j.ics.2006.03.036, DOI 10.1016/J.ICS.2006.03.036]
   O'Higgins P, 2012, EVOL BIOL, V39, P521, DOI 10.1007/s11692-012-9173-8
   O'Higgins P, 2011, J ANAT, V218, P3, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01301.x
   Park IH, 2010, INT J PEDIATR OTORHI, V74, P1347, DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.08.018
   Parr WCH, 2012, J THEOR BIOL, V301, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.01.030
   Pearson OM, 2004, YEARB PHYS ANTHROPOL, V47, P63, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.20155
   PICQ PG, 1989, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V79, P393, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330790315
   Preuschoft Holger, 2002, Senckenbergiana Lethaea, V82, P207
   Prossinger H, 2000, ANAT RECORD, V261, P170, DOI 10.1002/1097-0185(20001015)261:5<170::AID-AR5>3.0.CO;2-2
   Prossinger Hermann, 2003, Anatomical Record, V273B, P132, DOI 10.1002/ar.b.10022
   Rae TC, 2004, EVOL ANTHROPOL, V13, P211, DOI 10.1002/evan.20036
   Rae TC, 2003, AM J PRIMATOL, V59, P153, DOI 10.1002/ajp.10072
   Rae TC, 2008, ANAT REC, V291, P1414, DOI 10.1002/ar.20786
   Rae TC, 2006, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V273, P2605, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2006.3629
   Rae TC, 2011, J HUM EVOL, V60, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.10.003
   Ravosa MJ, 2000, ANAT REC, V261, P173, DOI 10.1002/1097-0185(20001015)261:5<173::AID-AR6>3.0.CO;2-X
   Rossie JB, 2006, J MORPHOL, V267, P1, DOI 10.1002/jmor.10263
   Ruff C, 2006, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V129, P484, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.20371
   Scheuer L., 2000, DEV JUVENILE OSTEOLO
   Schwartz JH., 2003, The Human Fossil Record, VII., DOI 10.1002/0471722715
   Schwartz-Dabney CL, 2003, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V120, P252, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.10121
   Seidler H, 1997, J HUM EVOL, V33, P691, DOI 10.1006/jhev.1997.0163
   SHEA BT, 1977, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V47, P289, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330470209
   Sigal IA, 2008, J BIOMECH, V41, P1381, DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.02.019
   Sigal IA, 2010, J BIOMECH, V43, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.08.036
   Skerry T., 2000, DEV GROWTH EVOLUTION, P29
   Smith AL, 2015, ANAT REC, V298, P145, DOI 10.1002/ar.23073
   Smith TD, 2005, ANAT REC PART A, V285A, P677, DOI 10.1002/ar.a.20209
   Smith TD, 2011, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V144, P392, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.21421
   Smith TD, 2010, ANAT REC, V293, P91, DOI 10.1002/ar.21017
   Spaeth J, 1997, INT J PEDIATR OTORHI, V39, P25, DOI 10.1016/S0165-5876(96)01458-9
   Sperber G.H., 2001, CRANIOFACIAL DEV
   Stayton CT, 2009, EVOLUTION, V63, P1348, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00655.x
   Steegmann AT, 2002, AM J HUM BIOL, V14, P566, DOI 10.1002/ajhb.10070
   Strait DS, 2007, J HUM EVOL, V52, P585, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.11.019
   Strait DS, 2010, ANAT REC, V293, P583, DOI 10.1002/ar.21122
   Strait DS, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P2124, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0808730106
   STRINGER C., 2012, The Origin of Our Species
   Stringer C, 2012, EVOL ANTHROPOL, V21, P101, DOI 10.1002/evan.21311
   Tattersall I, 2007, VERTEBR PALEOBIOL PA, P9
   Tillier A.M., 1977, Bull. Mem. Soc. Anthropol, P177
   Toro-Ibacache V, 2016, J ANAT, V228, P70, DOI 10.1111/joa.12384
   Turner CH, 1998, BONE, V23, P399, DOI 10.1016/S8756-3282(98)00118-5
   Valdimarsson O, 2005, J BONE MINER RES, V20, P906, DOI 10.1359/JBMR.050107
   Witmer LM, 1997, J VERTEBR PALEONTOL, V17, P1, DOI 10.1080/02724634.1997.10011027
   Witzel U, 2002, Anthropol Anz, V60, P113
   Witzel U, 2011, VERTEBR PALEOBIOL PA, P203, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0492-3_18
   Wolpoff M., 1999, Paleoanthropology
   Wroe S, 2010, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V277, P3579, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.0509
   Zelditch ML, 2012, GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS FOR BIOLOGISTS: A PRIMER, 2ND EDITION, P1
   Zollikofer CPE, 2008, ANAT REC, V291, P1446, DOI 10.1002/ar.20784
   Zollikofer CPE, 2008, ANAT REC, V291, P1506, DOI 10.1002/ar.20779
NR 103
TC 14
Z9 14
U1 0
U2 10
PU ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI LONDON
PA 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON NW1 7DX, ENGLAND
SN 0047-2484
J9 J HUM EVOL
JI J. Hum. Evol.
PD JAN
PY 2018
VL 114
BP 141
EP 153
DI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.10.007
PG 13
WC Anthropology; Evolutionary Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Anthropology; Evolutionary Biology
GA FX6ZH
UT WOS:000426235300010
PM 29447756
OA Green Accepted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Heller, NE
   Kreitler, J
   Ackerly, DD
   Weiss, SB
   Recinos, A
   Branciforte, R
   Flint, LE
   Flint, AL
   Micheli, E
AF Heller, Nicole E.
   Kreitler, Jason
   Ackerly, David D.
   Weiss, Stuart B.
   Recinos, Amanda
   Branciforte, Ryan
   Flint, Lorraine E.
   Flint, Alan L.
   Micheli, Elisabeth
TI Targeting climate diversity in conservation planning to build resilience
   to climate change
SO ECOSPHERE
LA English
DT Article
DE abiotic diversity; biodiversity; climate adaptation; climate change;
   impact; MARXAN; protected areas; resilience; San Francisco Bay Area;
   systematic conservation planning; terrestrial
ID BIODIVERSITY; ADAPTATION; MANAGEMENT; CALIFORNIA; MICROREFUGIA;
   RESPONSES; SELECTION; FORESTS; MODELS; IMPACT
AB Climate change is raising challenging concerns for systematic conservation planning. Are methods based on the current spatial patterns of biodiversity effective given long-term climate change? Some conservation scientists argue that planning should focus on protecting the abiotic diversity in the landscape, which drives patterns of biological diversity, rather than focusing on the distribution of focal species, which shift in response to climate change. Climate is one important abiotic driver of biodiversity patterns, as different climates host different biological communities and genetic pools. We propose conservation networks that capture the full range of climatic diversity in a region will improve the resilience of biotic communities to climate change compared to networks that do not. In this study we used historical and future hydro-climate projections from the high resolution Basin Characterization Model to explore the utility of directly targeting climatic diversity in planning. Using the spatial planning tool, Marxan, we designed conservation networks to capture the diversity of climate types, at the regional and sub-regional scale, and compared them to networks we designed to capture the diversity of vegetation types. By focusing on the Conservation Lands Network (CLN) of the San Francisco Bay Area as a real-world case study, we compared the potential resilience of networks by examining two factors: the range of climate space captured, and climatic stability to 18 future climates, reflecting different emission scenarios and global climate models. We found that the climate-based network planned at the sub-regional scale captured a greater range of climate space and showed higher climatic stability than the vegetation and regional based-networks. At the same time, differences among network scenarios are small relative to the variance in climate stability across global climate models. Across different projected futures, topographically heterogeneous areas consistently show greater climate stability than homogenous areas. The analysis suggests that utilizing high-resolution climate and hydrological data in conservation planning improves the likely resilience of biodiversity to climate change. We used these analyses to suggest new conservation priorities for the San Francisco Bay Area.
C1 [Heller, Nicole E.; Micheli, Elisabeth] Pepperwood Preserve, Dwight Ctr Conservat Sci, Santa Rosa, CA 95472 USA.
   [Heller, Nicole E.] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC 27708 USA.
   [Kreitler, Jason] US Geol Survey, Boise, ID 83702 USA.
   [Ackerly, David D.] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Integrat Biol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
   [Ackerly, David D.] Univ Calif Berkeley, Jepson Herbarium, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
   [Weiss, Stuart B.] Creekside Ctr Earth Observat, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA.
   [Recinos, Amanda] GreenInfo Network, San Francisco, CA 94104 USA.
   [Branciforte, Ryan] Bay Area Open Space Council, Berkeley, CA 94704 USA.
   [Flint, Lorraine E.; Flint, Alan L.] US Geol Survey, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA.
C3 Duke University; United States Department of the Interior; United States
   Geological Survey; University of California System; University of
   California Berkeley; University of California System; University of
   California Berkeley; United States Department of the Interior; United
   States Geological Survey
RP Heller, NE (corresponding author), Pepperwood Preserve, Dwight Ctr Conservat Sci, Santa Rosa, CA 95472 USA.
EM heller.nicole@gmail.com
RI ; Ackerly, David/A-1247-2009
OI Heller, Nicole/0000-0003-1370-8182; Ackerly, David/0000-0002-1847-7398
FU Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [2861]; California Landscape
   Conservation Cooperative
FX We thank Kirk Klausmeyer, Sam Veloz, Claudia Tebaldi, Healy Hamilton,
   and Adina Merenlender and other members of the Bay Area Terrestrial
   Biodiversity and Climate Change Collaborative (TBC3.org) for many
   helpful discussions in devising this analysis. We also thank two
   anonymous reviewers for helpful edits and feedback. We thank the Gordon
   and Betty Moore Foundation for financial support for this work (grant
   #2861), and the California Landscape Conservation Cooperative for
   funding awarded to Jason Kreitler. Any use of trade, firm, or product
   names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by
   the U.S. Government.
CR Ackerly DD, 2010, DIVERS DISTRIB, V16, P476, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00654.x
   Ackerly D. D., 2012, PUBLICATION CALIFORN, VCFC-500-2012-037
   Anderson MG, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011554
   [Anonymous], 2012, San Fr. Estuary Watershed Sci
   [Anonymous], 20125132 US GEOL SUR
   [Anonymous], P NATL ACAD SCI
   [Anonymous], CEC5002012023
   Araújo MB, 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V11, P1504, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01000.x
   Araújo MB, 2004, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V10, P1618, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00828.x
   Ashcroft MB, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P1866, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02661.x
   Ball I. R., 2009, SPATIAL CONSERVATION, P185
   Barber CB, 1996, ACM T MATH SOFTWARE, V22, P469, DOI 10.1145/235815.235821
   Bay Area Open Space Council, 2011, CONS LANDS NETW SAN
   Beier P, 2010, CONSERV BIOL, V24, P701, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01422.x
   Bellard C, 2012, ECOL LETT, V15, P365, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x
   Cross MS, 2013, CONSERV BIOL, V27, P4, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01954.x
   Daly C, 2008, INT J CLIMATOL, V28, P2031, DOI 10.1002/joc.1688
   Das AJ, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069917
   Dobrowski SZ, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P1022, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02263.x
   Elith J, 2009, ECOGRAPHY, V32, P66, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05505.x
   Flint L.E., 2012, ECOL PROCESS, V1, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1186/2192-1709-1-2, 10.1186/2192-1709-1-2]
   Flint L.E., 2013, ECOL PROCESS, V2, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1186/2192-1709-2-25, 10.1186/2192-1709-2-25]
   Franklin J, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P473, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12051
   Gallagher RV, 2010, J ECOL, V98, P790, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01677.x
   Gavin DG, 2014, NEW PHYTOL, V204, P37, DOI 10.1111/nph.12929
   Hannah L, 2007, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V5, P131, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[131:PANIAC]2.0.CO;2
   Hannah L, 2002, CONSERV BIOL, V16, P264, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00465.x
   Harris JA, 2006, RESTOR ECOL, V14, P170, DOI 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00136.x
   Heller NE, 2009, BIOL CONSERV, V142, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.006
   HUNTER ML, 1988, CONSERV BIOL, V2, P375, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1988.tb00202.x
   Iwamura T, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0015103
   Klausmeyer KR, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006392
   Kueppers LM, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P16281, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0501427102
   Lawler J. J., 2015, CONSERVATIO IN PRESS
   Loarie SR, 2009, NATURE, V462, P1052, DOI 10.1038/nature08649
   Millar CI, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P2145, DOI 10.1890/06-1715.1
   Millar CI, 2012, CAN J FOREST RES, V42, P749, DOI [10.1139/x2012-031, 10.1139/X2012-031]
   MORITZ C, 2002, SYST BIOL, V51, P228
   Moritz C, 2008, SCIENCE, V322, P261, DOI 10.1126/science.1163428
   Noss RF, 2001, CONSERV BIOL, V15, P578, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003578.x
   Parmesan C, 2006, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V37, P637, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
   PETERS RL, 1985, BIOSCIENCE, V35, P707, DOI 10.2307/1310052
   Pressey RL, 2007, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V22, P583, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.001
   Pyke CR, 2005, BIOL CONSERV, V121, P429, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.019
   Rapacciuolo G, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P2841, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12638
   Rouget M, 2003, DIVERS DISTRIB, V9, P191, DOI 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00025.x
   Schloss CA, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0028788
   Sgrò CM, 2011, EVOL APPL, V4, P326, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00157.x
   STEPHENSON NL, 1990, AM NAT, V135, P649, DOI 10.1086/285067
   Svenning JC, 2013, AM J BOT, V100, P1266, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1200469
   Thrasher Bridget, 2013, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, V94, P321
   Torregrosa A, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0058450
   van Mantgem PJ, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P1151, DOI 10.1111/ele.12151
   Veloz SD, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P1698, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02635.x
   Walker Richard., 2007, The Country in the City: The Greening of the San Francisco Bay Area
   Watson JEM, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P989, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2007, 10.1038/nclimate2007]
   WEISS SB, 1988, ECOLOGY, V69, P1486, DOI 10.2307/1941646
   Willis KJ, 2009, SCIENCE, V326, P806, DOI 10.1126/science.1178838
   Wood AW, 2004, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V62, P189, DOI 10.1023/B:CLIM.0000013685.99609.9e
   Wood AW, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V107, DOI 10.1029/2001JD000659
NR 60
TC 28
Z9 31
U1 3
U2 98
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 2150-8925
J9 ECOSPHERE
JI Ecosphere
PD APR
PY 2015
VL 6
IS 4
AR 65
DI 10.1890/ES14-00313.1
PG 20
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA CI5EV
UT WOS:000354777300020
OA Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Pinheiro, RSB
   Farias, IMSC
   Francisco, CL
   Moreno, GMB
AF Pinheiro, Rafael S. B.
   Farias, Iasmin M. S. C.
   Francisco, Caroline L.
   Moreno, Greicy M. B.
TI Physicochemical Quality and Fatty Acid Profile in the Meat of Goats Fed
   Forage Cactus as a Substitute for Tifton 85 Hay
SO ANIMALS
LA English
DT Article
DE cladodes; climate changes; healthy meat; ruminant; sustainability
ID LINOLEIC-ACID; SHEEP; COLOR; LAMB; DIET; CAROTENOIDS; RUMINANTS; MUSCLE;
   BEEF; PH
AB Simple Summary The use of cacti, such as forage cactus, in goat feeding is widely practised in Northeast Brazil due to adaptation to climatic conditions, mainly in arid and semi-arid regions. During dry periods, when water is the main limiting factor for the development of most plant species, the growth of forage cactus is not compromised due to crassulacean acid metabolism. However, little is known about the effects of forage cactus on goats' diet in relation to meat quality. In this study, we evaluated the inclusion of 0, 25 and 55% of forage cactus replacing Tifton 85 hay in the diet of goats and its effects on meat quality. Meat from kids fed 55% of forage cactus showed greater acceptance by consumers. Therefore, it is recommended that Tifton 85 hay be replaced with 55% forage cactus, as it provides lower lipid content and higher monounsaturated fatty acid content in goat meat. Low rainfall in Northeast Brazil is a limiting factor for animal production. Forages that present crassulacean acid metabolism, such as forage cactus, are adapted to the edaphoclimatic conditions of this region, as they lose little water through the stomata. Thus, the objective was to evaluate the physical and chemical quality, fatty acid profile and sensory acceptance of the meat from goats fed forage cactus as a substitute for Tifton 85 hay. Twenty-one uncastrated mixed-breed goats with a mean body weight of 18 +/- 0.86 kg and 7 +/- 1 months of age were used. A completely randomized design with three treatments and seven replications per treatment was performed. The inclusion of 0 (control), 25 and 55% of forage cactus in substitution of Tifton 85 hay in the diet of the goats was evaluated. The lipid content in the meat of animals fed 25 and 55% of forage cactus was 1.33% and 1.26%, respectively, and was lower (p < 0.05) in relation to the meat of animals that received the control diet (1.56%). The inclusion of 55% of forage cactus provided an increase (p < 0.05) in the content of monounsaturated fatty acids in the meat (52.71%) in relation to the control meat (37.75%). Sensory analysis differed (p < 0.05) between treatments. We recommend replacing Tifton 85 hay with 55% forage cactus, as it presents greater sensory acceptance, and provides lower lipid content and higher content of monounsaturated fatty acids in goat meat.
C1 [Pinheiro, Rafael S. B.] Sao Paulo State Univ Julio de Mesquita Filho Unesp, Sch Engn, BR-15385000 Ilha Solteira, Brazil.
   [Farias, Iasmin M. S. C.; Francisco, Caroline L.] Sao Paulo State Univ Julio de Mesquita Filho Unesp, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, BR-18618681 Botucatu, Brazil.
   [Moreno, Greicy M. B.] Univ Fed Alagoas, Campus Arapiraca, BR-57309005 Arapiraca, Alagoas, Brazil.
C3 Universidade Federal de Alagoas
RP Pinheiro, RSB (corresponding author), Sao Paulo State Univ Julio de Mesquita Filho Unesp, Sch Engn, BR-15385000 Ilha Solteira, Brazil.
EM rafael.pinheiro@unesp.br
RI PINHEIRO, RAFAEL SILVIO BONILHA/GLR-9145-2022; Moreno,
   Greicy/AAE-1958-2019
OI Moreno, Greicy/0000-0002-7458-9482; De Farias,
   Iasmin/0000-0001-6605-3824
CR Abidi S, 2009, SMALL RUMINANT RES, V87, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.09.004
   Alberti P, 2017, VIANDES PRODUCITS CA, V33, P1
   AMSA-American Meat Science Association, 2012, MEAT COL MEAS GUID, V1, P135
   Anaeto M., 2010, Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, V1, P1231, DOI 10.5251/abjna.2010.1.6.1231.1236
   Andrade-Montemayor HM, 2011, SMALL RUMINANT RES, V98, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.03.023
   [Anonymous], 2007, Nutrient requirements of small ruminants
   [Anonymous], 2013, SAS SYSTEM WINDOWS R
   [Anonymous], ?About us"
   AOAC, 1995, OFF METH AN ASS AN C
   Aranceta J, 2012, BRIT J NUTR, V107, pS8, DOI 10.1017/S0007114512001444
   Pinho RMA, 2018, ANIM SCI J, V89, P1424, DOI 10.1111/asj.13043
   Archana PR, 2018, MEAT SCI, V141, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.015
   Astiz C.S., 2008, Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, V37, P143, DOI [10.1590/S1516-35982008001300018, DOI 10.1590/S1516-35982008001300018]
   Bartosz G., 2013, Food Oxidants and Antioxidants: Chemical, Biological, and Functional Properties
   Bickerstaffe R., 1997, INT C MEAT SCI TECHN, V43, P196
   BLIGH EG, 1959, CAN J BIOCHEM PHYS, V37, P911
   Borges A.S., 2006, 101 NC TECNOL ALIMEN, V26, P891, DOI [10.1590/S0101-20612006000400028, DOI 10.1590/S0101-20612006000400028]
   Calderón F, 2007, J DAIRY SCI, V90, P5651, DOI 10.3168/jds.2007-0264
   Cardoso DB, 2021, ANIM FEED SCI TECH, V272, DOI 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114788
   Cordova-Torres AV, 2022, LIVEST SCI, V258, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2022.104828
   Costa RG, 2017, J SCI FOOD AGR, V97, P4438, DOI 10.1002/jsfa.8303
   Costa RG, 2012, REV BRAS ZOOTECN, V41, P432, DOI 10.1590/S1516-35982012000200028
   Silva DKD, 2020, SEMIN-CIENC AGRAR, V41, P1639, DOI 10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n5p1639
   de Araujo CM, 2020, REV BRAS ZOOTECN, V49, DOI 10.37496/rbz4920190271
   Monte ALDS, 2007, CIENCIA TECNOL ALIME, V27, P233, DOI 10.1590/S0101-20612007000200004
   Dhanda JS, 1999, MEAT SCI, V52, P363, DOI 10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00015-7
   Souza AFD, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0231191
   Souza MFD, 2019, SMALL RUMINANT RES, V179, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.08.017
   El Otmani S, 2021, ANIM FEED SCI TECH, V272, DOI 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114746
   Elmore JS, 2000, MEAT SCI, V55, P149, DOI 10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00137-0
   de Abreu KSF, 2019, MEAT SCI, V148, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.036
   Galvao Junior J. G. B., 2014, Acta Veterinaria Brasilica, V8, P78
   Geay Y, 2001, REPROD NUTR DEV, V41, P1, DOI 10.1051/rnd:2001108
   Gebremariam T, 2006, ANIM FEED SCI TECH, V131, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.02.003
   GREGORY RA, 1992, J ARID ENVIRON, V22, P323, DOI 10.1016/S0140-1963(18)30574-3
   HAMM REINER, 1960, ADVANCES IN FOOD RES, V10, P355
   Hartman L, 1973, Lab Pract, V22, P475
   Honikel KO, 1998, MEAT SCI, V49, P447, DOI 10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00034-5
   Honkanen AM, 2012, J DAIRY SCI, V95, P1376, DOI 10.3168/jds.2011-4390
   Hopkins DL, 1998, MEAT SCI, V49, P477, DOI 10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00051-5
   Hughes JM, 2014, MEAT SCI, V98, P520, DOI 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.05.022
   IBGE Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, 2021, HERD NUMB TYP HERD
   Jacob RH, 2014, MEAT SCI, V96, P1120, DOI 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.10.039
   Jaramillo-Flores ME, 2003, FOOD SCI TECHNOL INT, V9, P271, DOI 10.1177/108201303036093
   Joo ST, 2013, MEAT SCI, V95, P828, DOI 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.044
   Kenward MG, 1997, BIOMETRICS, V53, P983, DOI 10.2307/2533558
   Koppen W., 1931, GRUNDRISS KLIMAKUNDE, P390
   Li SB, 2022, FOOD RES INT, V152, DOI 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110923
   Lopes E.D., 2012, JOAO PESSOA EMEPA PB, V7, P256
   Mahouachi M, 2012, ScientificWorldJournal, V2012, P321567, DOI 10.1100/2012/321567
   Marengo JA, 2017, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V129, P1189, DOI 10.1007/s00704-016-1840-8
   Medeiros S.R., 2015, LIPIDIOS NUTR RUMINA, V1
   Moraes M.A.C., 1993, METHODS SENSORY EVAL, P1
   Oliveira FA, 2019, TROP ANIM HEALTH PRO, V51, P589, DOI 10.1007/s11250-018-1733-1
   Pastorelli G, 2022, ANIMALS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/ani12131597
   Pinheiro RSB, 2012, ARQ BRAS MED VET ZOO, V64, P1053, DOI 10.1590/S0102-09352012000400035
   Pinheiro R.S.B., 2009, THESIS U ESTADUAL PA, p55f
   Pophiwa P, 2020, SMALL RUMINANT RES, V183, DOI 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.106035
   Pösö AR, 2005, MEAT SCI, V70, P423, DOI 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.12.017
   Pratiwi NMW, 2007, MEAT SCI, V75, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.06.026
   Raes K, 2004, ANIM FEED SCI TECH, V113, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.09.001
   RIISPOARegulation of Industrial and Sanitary Inspection of Products of Animal Origin, 2000, TECHN REG STUNN METH
   Scollan ND, 2001, BRIT J NUTR, V85, P115, DOI 10.1079/BJN2000223
   Sen AR, 2004, MEAT SCI, V66, P757, DOI 10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00035-4
   Silva D.J., 2006, FOOD ANAL CHEM BIOL, P1
   Tegegne F, 2007, SMALL RUMINANT RES, V72, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.10.004
   Troegeler-Meynadier A, 2003, J DAIRY SCI, V86, P4054, DOI 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74017-X
   Tshabalala PA, 2003, MEAT SCI, V65, P563, DOI 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00249-8
   Webb EC, 2005, SMALL RUMINANT RES, V60, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.06.009
NR 69
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 8
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
SN 2076-2615
J9 ANIMALS-BASEL
JI Animals
PD MAR
PY 2023
VL 13
IS 6
AR 957
DI 10.3390/ani13060957
PG 15
WC Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science; Veterinary Sciences; Zoology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Veterinary Sciences; Zoology
GA A2AW0
UT WOS:000953220000001
PM 36978501
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Gourdji, S
   Läderach, P
   Valle, AM
   Martinez, CZ
   Lobell, DB
AF Gourdji, Sharon
   Laederach, Peter
   Martinez Valle, Armando
   Zelaya Martinez, Carlos
   Lobell, David B.
TI Historical climate trends, deforestation, and maize and bean yields in
   Nicaragua
SO AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; Agricultural yields; Central America; Statistical
   crop-weather models
ID DRY SEASON PRECIPITATION; POTENTIAL IMPACTS; LAND MANAGEMENT; CROP
   PRODUCTION; CENTRAL-AMERICA; FARMERS; SURFACE; ENVIRONMENTS;
   AGRICULTURE; TEMPERATURE
AB Nicaragua has already experienced substantial climate change, in part due to a loss of one half of its forest cover in the last half-century. In this study, we assess the extent to which historical climate trends have contributed to stagnating yields for maize (Zen mays) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), the two main staple crops in the country. We first analyze 40 years of historical weather data throughout Nicaragua to estimate trends, and assess the extent to which these trends correlate with spatial deforestation patterns. Then, we create a regression model linking department-level maize and bean yields with seasonal weather conditions, and use the model to estimate the impact of historical climate trends on yields. Regressions are run for yields on both harvested and sown area, with the latter accounting for the effect of complete crop losses. Results confirm strong warming trends throughout the country, with daytime temperatures in deforested areas warming at more than double the rate of global averages in the tropics. Decreases in rainfall frequency are also seen almost everywhere, along with an earlier end to the rainy season. Regression model results show, as expected, that red bean is a highly temperature-sensitive crop, and that maize is more water-limited than bean due to its longer seasonal duration. Warming temperatures and less frequent rainfall have led to drought-related losses for both crops in the main commercial production areas, while heavier rains at planting and harvest have also negatively affected yields, especially for bean. Moreover, reduced precipitation in December and January has negatively impacted production for bean in the commercially important apante, or dry season, on the humid Atlantic side of the country. In these areas, however, substantial model uncertainty remains for maize, with an alternative model formulation showing substantial benefits from drier and sunnier conditions. At an annual, national scale, beans have been more affected by climate trends since 1970 than maize, with -5% yield declines per decade on harvested area for bean and -4% for maize, and -12% and -7% yield declines respectively on sown area (with the alternative model showing gains for maize). Climate adaptation responses include government efforts to limit bean exports to control consumer prices, a switch from red to black bean for commercial sales and export, and area expansion and migration for bean in order to maintain production levels. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
C1 [Gourdji, Sharon] CIAT, Cali, Colombia.
   [Laederach, Peter; Martinez Valle, Armando; Zelaya Martinez, Carlos] CIAT, Managua, Nicaragua.
   [Lobell, David B.] Stanford Univ, Ctr Food Secur & Environm, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
   [Lobell, David B.] Stanford Univ, Dept Environm Earth Syst Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
C3 Alliance; International Center for Tropical Agriculture - CIAT;
   Alliance; International Center for Tropical Agriculture - CIAT; Stanford
   University; Stanford University
RP Gourdji, S (corresponding author), Ctr Int Agr Trop, Km 17, Recta Cali Palmira Cali, Colombia.
EM s.m.gourdji@cgiar.org
OI Lobell, David/0000-0002-5969-3476; Laderach, Peter/0000-0001-8708-6318
FU Rockefeller Foundation; Fulbright NEXUS fellowship
FX This research was conducted under the CGIAR Research Program on Climate
   Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), and was supported by the
   Rockefeller Foundation and by a Fulbright NEXUS fellowship to Sharon
   Gourdji. We would like to gratefully acknowledge the use of data sources
   from the Nicaraguan ministry of agriculture and livestock (MAGFOR) and
   the Institute of Territorial Studies (INETER), which maintains the
   network of meteorological stations in the country. Carlos J. Perez from
   the United Nations Development Program also offered valuable suggestions
   to improve the manuscript.
CR Aguilar E, 2005, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V110, DOI 10.1029/2005JD006119
   [Anonymous], FAOSTAT FOOD BAL SHE
   Barron J, 2003, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V117, P23, DOI 10.1016/S0168-1923(03)00037-6
   Beebe SE, 2008, CROP SCI, V48, P582, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2007.07.0404
   Biasutti M, 2009, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V36, DOI 10.1029/2009GL041303
   Biazin B, 2012, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V47-48, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2011.08.015
   Castillo CKG, 2013, J CLIMATE, V26, P805, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00382.1
   Challinor AJ, 2009, J EXP BOT, V60, P2775, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erp062
   Chou C, 2013, NAT GEOSCI, V6, P263, DOI [10.1038/NGEO1744, 10.1038/ngeo1744]
   Eakin H, 1999, PHYS GEOGR, V20, P447, DOI 10.1080/02723646.1999.10642689
   Fu R, 2004, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V78, P97, DOI 10.1007/s00704-004-0046-7
   Gourdji SM, 2013, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V280, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2012.2190
   HALL P, 1995, BIOMETRIKA, V82, P561
   Hatfield JL, 2011, AGRON J, V103, P351, DOI 10.2134/agronj2010.0303
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   Hoffmann H, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0075033
   Holt-Giménez E, 2002, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V93, P87, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00006-3
   Houspanossian J, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P1211, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12121
   INIDE MAGFOR Equipo tecnico del VI censo, 2012, INF FIN 4 CENS NAC A
   Instituto Nacional de Informacion de Desarrollo (INIDE), 2012, 4 CENS NAC AGR
   Instituto Nicaraguense de Tecnologia Agropecuaria, 2012, AD MAIZ FRIJ CAMB CL
   Jones PG, 2003, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V13, P51, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00090-0
   Kassie BT, 2013, ENVIRON MANAGE, V52, P1115, DOI 10.1007/s00267-013-0145-2
   Kinzer Stephen., 2007, Blood of Brothers, Life and War in Nicaragua
   Koehler AK, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034016
   KONSENS I, 1991, ANN BOT-LONDON, V67, P391, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088173
   LeoGrande WM, 1996, THIRD WORLD Q, V17, P329
   Lin BB, 2007, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V144, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.12.009
   Lobell DB, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P616, DOI [10.1126/science.1206376, 10.1126/science.1204531]
   Lobell DB, 2011, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V1, P42, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1043, 10.1038/nclimate1043]
   Lobell DB, 2008, ENVIRON RES LETT, V3, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/3/3/034007
   MAGFOR, 2013, AGR PROD STAT
   Maltais-Landry G, 2012, AGRON J, V104, P301, DOI 10.2134/agronj2011.0220
   New M, 2000, J CLIMATE, V13, P2217, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<2217:RTCSTC>2.0.CO;2
   Pielke RA, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P101, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(101)
   Porch TG, 2007, J AGR U PUERTO RICO, V91, P133
   Prasad PVV, 2002, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V8, P710, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00508.x
   Ray DK, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V119, P775, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0753-0
   Redo DJ, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P8839, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1201664109
   Rockström J, 2002, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V27, P949, DOI 10.1016/S1474-7065(02)00098-0
   Schmidt A., 2012, TORTILLAS ROASTER TO
   Seth A, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P403, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9973-8
   Simelton E, 2013, CLIM DEV, V5, P123, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.751893
   Smith A, 2011, B AM METEOROL SOC, V92, P704, DOI 10.1175/2011BAMS3015.1
   Stoorvogel JJ, 1998, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V50, P151, DOI 10.1023/A:1009732126336
   Stroosnijder L, 2009, SOIL TILL RES, V103, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2008.05.019
   Tao FL, 2012, CLIM RES, V54, P233, DOI 10.3354/cr01131
   Union Nacional de Agricultores y Ganaderos (UNAG), 2012, CULTI FRIJ NIC
   Vermeulen SJ, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P8357, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1219441110
   Zhang HQ, 2009, ADV ATMOS SCI, V26, P840, DOI 10.1007/s00376-009-8047-1
   Zhang T., 2007, GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE R
NR 51
TC 62
Z9 73
U1 0
U2 103
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
PI AMSTERDAM
PA PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0168-1923
EI 1873-2240
J9 AGR FOREST METEOROL
JI Agric. For. Meteorol.
PD JAN 15
PY 2015
VL 200
BP 270
EP 281
DI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.10.002
PG 12
WC Agronomy; Forestry; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Forestry; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA AY4ZB
UT WOS:000347582300026
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, ZH
   Su, L
   Li, W
   Chen, W
   Zhu, YG
AF Zhang, ZH
   Su, L
   Li, W
   Chen, W
   Zhu, YG
TI A major QTL conferring cold tolerance at the early seedling stage using
   recombinant inbred lines of rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.)
SO PLANT SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE rice (Oryza sativa l.); cold tolerance; quantitative trait loci (QTL);
   epistasis
ID QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; LOW-TEMPERATURE TOLERANCE; FROST-RESISTANCE;
   GENETIC-ANALYSIS; BOOTING STAGE; CHROMOSOME 5A; IDENTIFICATION;
   CONSERVATION; POLYMORPHISM; INHERITANCE
AB Cold tolerance at early seedling stage of rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the major determinants for the stable stand establishment in temperate and high-elevation areas. In the current study, with 269 recombinant inbred lines derived from a cross between a japonica tolerant to cold and a sensitive indica of rice, the cold tolerance at early seedling stage was evaluated by the paper-roll tests in a two-replication trial with 10- and 13-day treatments at 10 degreesC, respectively. The phenotype data, in combination with a complete linkage map consisting of 198 marker loci. were used to conduct composite interval mapping to locate both main-effect and digenic epistatic QTL for the trait. Three main-effect QTL were identified. The comparison of the QTL identified in these two cold treatments resulted in an intriguing finding that seedling cold tolerance in the 10-day cold treatment was regulated by many loci each with minor effect while that in the 13-day cold treatment was controlled by a major QTL as well as trtmor ones. Of the three main-effect QTL, QTL qSCT-11, closely linked to microsatellite marker RM202 onchromosome 11, was found to increase its additive effect from 4.07 to 10.11% (seedling survival percentage) as the duration of cold stress was prolonged from 10 days to 13 days. In the 13-day cold treatment, QTL qSCT-11 was detected at a very high LOD score of 19, explaining up to 30% of the phenotypic variation. In addition, a total of nine digenic interactions were detected, each showing small effects on cold tolerance with R-2 ranging from 3.5 to 9.7%, with an average R-2 of 5.3%. In the 13-day cold treatment, the sum of absolute epistatic effects of all the interactions amounted up to 36% in seedling survival percentage, suggesting the importance of epistasis in the genetic control of cold tolerance. These results would favor our better understanding of the genetic control of cold tolerance in rice. The identification of QTL for the trait is important for the development of rice cultivars with a broader climatic adaptation. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 Wuhan Univ, Coll Life Sci, Key Lab, Educ Minist China Plant Dev Biol, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China.
C3 Wuhan University
RP Wuhan Univ, Coll Life Sci, Key Lab, Educ Minist China Plant Dev Biol, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China.
EM zhangzh9@public.wh.hb.cn; zhuyg@public.wh.hb.cn
CR Abe F, 2002, FEBS LETT, V527, P181, DOI 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03218-0
   AHN S, 1993, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V90, P7980, DOI 10.1073/pnas.90.17.7980
   Andaya VC, 2003, J EXP BOT, V54, P2579, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erg243
   Andaya VC, 2003, THEOR APPL GENET, V106, P1084, DOI 10.1007/s00122-002-1126-7
   [Anonymous], 1997, Rice Genet. Newsl
   Choi DW, 2000, THEOR APPL GENET, V101, P350, DOI 10.1007/s001220051490
   Foolad MR, 1998, PLANT BREEDING, V117, P171, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1998.tb01473.x
   Foolad MR, 2001, EUPHYTICA, V122, P105, DOI 10.1023/A:1012616231637
   Francia E, 2004, THEOR APPL GENET, V108, P670, DOI 10.1007/s00122-003-1468-9
   Fujino K, 2004, THEOR APPL GENET, V108, P794, DOI 10.1007/s00122-003-1509-4
   GALIBA G, 1995, THEOR APPL GENET, V90, P1174, DOI 10.1007/BF00222940
   Gill KS, 1996, GENETICS, V143, P1001
   Huang Zheng, 2004, Acta Genetica Sinica, V31, P596
   IRRI, 1979, IRRI P RIC COLD TOL, P139
   Ismail AM, 1999, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V96, P13566, DOI 10.1073/pnas.96.23.13566
   Kato K, 1999, GENOME, V42, P204, DOI 10.1139/gen-42-2-204
   Kaw R. N., 1986, Rice genetics. Proceedings of the International Rice Genetics Symposium, 27-31 May, 1985, Manila, Philippines., P593
   KURATA N, 1994, BIO-TECHNOL, V12, P276, DOI 10.1038/nbt0394-276
   LI CC, 1980, CROP SCI, V20, P295, DOI 10.2135/cropsci1980.0011183X002000030001x
   Li ZK, 1997, GENETICS, V145, P453
   LI ZK, 1995, THEOR APPL GENET, V91, P374, DOI 10.1007/BF00220902
   Li ZK, 2001, GENETICS, V158, P1737
   Lincoln SE., 1992, CONSTRUCTING GENETIC
   Mackill DJ, 1997, CROP SCI, V37, P1340, DOI 10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700040051x
   Maroof MAS, 1996, THEOR APPL GENET, V92, P541, DOI 10.1007/BF00224556
   McCouch SR, 1997, PLANT MOL BIOL, V35, P89, DOI 10.1023/A:1005711431474
   Nakagahra M, 1997, PLANT MOL BIOL, V35, P69, DOI 10.1023/A:1005784431759
   Saito K, 2004, THEOR APPL GENET, V109, P515, DOI 10.1007/s00122-004-1667-z
   Saito K, 2001, THEOR APPL GENET, V103, P862, DOI 10.1007/s001220100661
   Sarmini K, 1998, J CAPILLARY ELECTROP, V5, P103
   *SAS I INC, 1996, SAS US GUID STAT
   Sthapit BR, 1998, CROP SCI, V38, P660, DOI 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800030007x
   SUTKA J, 1981, THEOR APPL GENET, V59, P145, DOI 10.1007/BF00264968
   TANKSLEY SD, 1993, ANNU REV GENET, V27, P205, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ge.27.120193.001225
   Vágújfalvi A, 2000, MOL GEN GENET, V263, P194, DOI 10.1007/s004380051160
   Wang DL, 1999, THEOR APPL GENET, V99, P1255, DOI 10.1007/s001220051331
   WU KS, 1993, MOL GEN GENET, V241, P225, DOI 10.1007/BF00280220
   Yan ChangJie Yan ChangJie, 1999, Chinese Journal of Rice Science, V13, P134
   Yano M, 2000, PLANT CELL, V12, P2473, DOI 10.1105/tpc.12.12.2473
NR 39
TC 93
Z9 121
U1 2
U2 34
PU ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
PI CLARE
PA ELSEVIER HOUSE, BROOKVALE PLAZA, EAST PARK SHANNON, CO, CLARE, 00000,
   IRELAND
SN 0168-9452
EI 1873-2259
J9 PLANT SCI
JI Plant Sci.
PD FEB
PY 2005
VL 168
IS 2
BP 527
EP 534
DI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.09.021
PG 8
WC Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Plant Sciences
GA 891CL
UT WOS:000226558800030
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Biscarini, F
   Mastrangelo, S
   Catillo, G
   Senczuk, G
   Ciampolini, R
AF Biscarini, Filippo
   Mastrangelo, Salvatore
   Catillo, Gennaro
   Senczuk, Gabriele
   Ciampolini, Roberta
TI Insights into Genetic Diversity, Runs of Homozygosity and
   Heterozygosity-Rich Regions in Maremmana Semi-Feral Cattle Using
   Pedigree and Genomic Data
SO ANIMALS
LA English
DT Article
DE maremmana cattle; runs of homozygosity; inbreeding; heterozygosity-rich
   regions; pedigree relationships; genomic relationships
ID EFFECTIVE POPULATION-SIZE; BREEDS; ASSOCIATION; HOLSTEIN
AB Simple Summary
   In this study, we estimated genetic diversity in semi-feral Maremmana cattle using both pedigree- and genomic-based approaches, and detected regions of homozygosity (ROH) and heterozygosity (ROHet) in the genome, which are still poorly characterized in the Maremmana breed. A sensitivity analysis on the parameters used to detect ROH and ROHet provided information which can be useful to guide studies on the detection of genomic runs in general, and in semi-feral cattle populations in particular. The average observed and expected heterozygosity were estimated at HO=0.274 and HE=0.261, respectively. Pedigree-based average inbreeding (F) was estimated at 4.9%. A total of 3332 ROH and 1471 ROHet were detected in the genomes of the 149 animals included in the study. Genes found to be within the identified ROH and ROHet islands (e.g., KCTD8, GNPDA2) point to phenotypic characteristics related to environmental adaptation and robustness of Maremmana cattle. These results are of important because they will help design and implement breeding and conservation strategies for Maremmana cattle, and provide guidelines for other local cattle breeds.
   Semi-feral local livestock populations, like Maremmana cattle, are the object of renewed interest for the conservation of biological diversity and the preservation and exploitation of unique and potentially relevant genetic material. The aim of this study was to estimate genetic diversity parameters in semi-feral Maremmana cattle using both pedigree- and genomic-based approaches (FIS and FROH), and to detect regions of homozygosity (ROH) and heterozygosity (ROHet) in the genome. The average heterozygosity estimates were in the range reported for other cattle breeds (HE=0.261, HO=0.274). Pedigree-based average inbreeding (F) was estimated at 4.9%. The correlation was low between F and genomic-based approaches (r=0.03 with FIS, r=0.21 with FROH), while it was higher between FIS and FROH (r=0.78). The low correlation between F and FROH coefficients may be the result of the limited pedigree depth available for the animals involved in this study. The ROH islands identified in Maremmana cattle included candidate genes associated with climate adaptation, carcass traits or the regulation of body weight, fat and energy metabolism. The ROHet islands contained candidate genes associated with nematode resistance and reproduction traits in livestock. The results of this study confirm that genome-based measures like FROH may be useful estimators of individual autozygosity, and may provide insights on pedigree-based inbreeding estimates in cases when animals' pedigree data are unavailable, thus providing a more detailed picture of the genetic diversity.
C1 [Biscarini, Filippo] CNR IBBA Natl Res Council, Inst Agr Biol & Biotechnol, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
   [Mastrangelo, Salvatore] Univ Palermo, Dipartimento Sci Agr Alimentari & Forestali, I-90128 Palermo, Italy.
   [Catillo, Gennaro] CREA, CREA Res Ctr Anim Prod & Acquaculture, I-00015 Monterotondo, Italy.
   [Senczuk, Gabriele] Univ Molise, Dipartimento Agr Ambiente & Alimenti, I-86100 Campobasso, Italy.
   [Ciampolini, Roberta] Univ Pisa, Dipartimento Sci Vet, I-56124 Pisa, Italy.
C3 University of Palermo; Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e
   L'analisi Dell'economia Agraria (CREA); University of Molise; University
   of Pisa
RP Biscarini, F (corresponding author), CNR IBBA Natl Res Council, Inst Agr Biol & Biotechnol, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
EM filippo.biscarini@ibba.cnr.it; salvatore.mastrangelo@unipa.it;
   gennaro.catillo@crea.gov.it; g.senczuk@unimol.it;
   roberta.ciampolini@unipi.it
RI Biscarini, Filippo/H-3334-2019; CIAMPOLINI, ROBERTA/IZE-5675-2023
OI MASTRANGELO, Salvatore/0000-0001-6511-1981; Biscarini,
   Filippo/0000-0002-3901-2354; CIAMPOLINI, ROBERTA/0000-0001-5676-1798;
   Senczuk, Gabriele/0000-0001-8889-2290
CR Barbato M, 2015, FRONT GENET, V6, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2015.00109
   Biscarini F., 2018, DetectRUNS: Detect Runs of Homozygosity and Runs of Heterozygosity in Diploid Genomes
   dos Santos WB, 2021, J ANIM BREED GENET, V138, P161, DOI 10.1111/jbg.12508
   Bozzi R, 2003, ITAL J ANIM SCI, V2, P121, DOI 10.4081/ijas.2003.s1.121
   Browning SR, 2007, AM J HUM GENET, V81, P1084, DOI 10.1086/521987
   Bruford MW, 2015, FRONT GENET, V6, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2015.00314
   Catillo G, 2018, LIVEST SCI, V216, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2018.07.011
   Chang CC, 2015, GIGASCIENCE, V4, DOI 10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8
   Coster A, 2010, Package 'pedigree'. R package version
   Curik I, 2014, LIVEST SCI, V166, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.05.034
   Do C, 2014, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V14, P209, DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12157
   Doekes HP, 2019, GENET SEL EVOL, V51, DOI 10.1186/s12711-019-0497-z
   Ferenakovi M., 2016, ACTA AGR SLOVENICA, V5, P42
   Ferencakovic M, 2013, J ANIM BREED GENET, V130, P286, DOI 10.1111/jbg.12012
   Ferencakovic M, 2013, GENET SEL EVOL, V45, DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-45-42
   Fioretti M, 2020, LIVEST SCI, V232, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2019.103903
   Flori L, 2019, MOL ECOL, V28, P1009, DOI 10.1111/mec.15004
   Forutan M, 2018, BMC GENOMICS, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12864-018-4453-z
   Gibson J, 2006, HUM MOL GENET, V15, P789, DOI 10.1093/hmg/ddi493
   Gurgul A, 2016, J APPL GENET, V57, P527, DOI 10.1007/s13353-016-0337-6
   Hay EH, 2018, J ANIM SCI, V96, P444, DOI 10.1093/jas/skx057
   Hayes BJ, 2008, ANIM GENET, V39, P105, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01683.x
   Hou YL, 2012, FUNCT INTEGR GENOMIC, V12, P81, DOI 10.1007/s10142-011-0252-1
   Howrigan DP, 2011, BMC GENOMICS, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-12-460
   Kugler W., 2014, The Ecological Value of Feral Livestock Populations in Europe: Overview, Situation and Development of a Network for Management of Wild and SemiWild Livestock Populations, Final Report
   Lou Y, 2020, J BIOMATER TISS ENG, V10, P17, DOI 10.1166/jbt.2020.2253
   Makanjuola BO, 2020, BMC GENOMICS, V21, DOI 10.1186/s12864-020-07031-w
   Maretto F, 2012, LIVEST SCI, V150, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.09.011
   Marras G., 2018, P 11 WORLD C GEN APP
   Marras G, 2015, ANIM GENET, V46, P110, DOI 10.1111/age.12259
   Mastrangelo S, 2018, ANIMAL, V12, P2480, DOI [10.1017/s1751731118000629, 10.1017/S1751731118000629]
   Mastrangelo S, 2016, ANIMAL, V10, P746, DOI 10.1017/S1751731115002943
   Mc Parland S, 2009, GENET SEL EVOL, V41, DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-41-16
   McQuillan R, 2008, AM J HUM GENET, V83, P359, DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.08.007
   Mekonnen YA, 2019, FRONT GENET, V10, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2019.01095
   Mészáros G, 2015, FRONT GENET, V6, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2015.00173
   Metzger J, 2015, BMC GENOMICS, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1977-3
   Meyermans R, 2020, BMC GENOMICS, V21, DOI 10.1186/s12864-020-6463-x
   Moioli B, 2004, J HERED, V95, P250, DOI 10.1093/jhered/esh032
   Mrode R.A., 2014, LINEAR MODELS PREDIC
   Negrini R, 2006, J ANIM BREED GENET, V123, P10, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00554.x
   Orozco-terWengel P, 2015, FRONT GENET, V6, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2015.00191
   Ouyang HJ, 2016, PEERJ, V4, DOI 10.7717/peerj.2129
   Peripolli E, 2017, ANIM GENET, V48, P255, DOI 10.1111/age.12526
   Purfield DC, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0176780
   Purfield DC, 2012, BMC GENET, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2156-13-70
   Schiavo G, 2020, LIVEST SCI, V240, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104219
   Senczuk G., 2020, AUTHOREA, DOI [10.22541/au.160303335.52950496/v1, DOI 10.22541/AU.160303335.52950496/V1]
   SVED J A, 1971, Theoretical Population Biology, V2, P125
   Szmatola T, 2020, J ANIM BREED GENET, V137, P571, DOI 10.1111/jbg.12482
   Szmatola T, 2019, ANIMALS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/ani9121024
   Szmatola T, 2016, LIVEST SCI, V188, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.04.006
   Torrecillas CP, 2002, J ANIM BREED GENET, V119, P274, DOI 10.1046/j.1439-0388.2002.00342.x
   VanRaden PM, 2008, J DAIRY SCI, V91, P4414, DOI 10.3168/jds.2007-0980
   VanRaden PM, 2011, J DAIRY SCI, V94, P5673, DOI 10.3168/jds.2011-4500
   Waples RS, 2008, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V8, P753, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2007.02061.x
   Williams JL, 2016, ANIM GENET, V47, P19, DOI 10.1111/age.12376
   Wright S, 1922, AM NAT, V56, P330, DOI 10.1086/279872
   Wu PX, 2018, GENOMICS, V110, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.ygeno.2017.09.009
   Xu LY, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-53274-3
   Zhang QQ, 2015, BMC GENOMICS, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1715-x
   Zsolnai A, 2020, ANIMAL, V14, P1786, DOI 10.1017/S1751731120000634
NR 62
TC 38
Z9 43
U1 1
U2 22
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
SN 2076-2615
J9 ANIMALS-BASEL
JI Animals
PD DEC
PY 2020
VL 10
IS 12
AR 2285
DI 10.3390/ani10122285
PG 17
WC Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science; Veterinary Sciences; Zoology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Veterinary Sciences; Zoology
GA PJ3QL
UT WOS:000601686700001
PM 33287320
OA gold, Green Submitted, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Lehmann, I
   Mathey, J
   Rössler, S
   Bräuer, A
   Goldberg, V
AF Lehmann, Iris
   Mathey, Juliane
   Roessler, Stefanie
   Braeuer, Anne
   Goldberg, Valeri
TI Urban vegetation structure types as a methodological approach for
   identifying ecosystem services - Application to the analysis of
   micro-climatic effects
SO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban vegetation structure mapping; Urban vegetation structure types;
   Micro-climate modelling; Urban micro-climate; Climate adaptation
ID BOUNDARY-LAYER; SOIL-WATER; THERMAL COMFORT; HEAT-ISLAND; GREEN AREAS;
   MODEL; SURFACE; TEMPERATURE; ENVIRONMENT; ADAPTATION
AB Increasingly decision-makers and politicians are becoming aware of the importance of urban ecosystem services (ESS). This creates an opportunity to deal with recent challenges of urban development. However, questions remain on how to assess and manage these services as well as to transfer the opportunities which present themselves into planning procedures. Since urban planning is mainly about land use decisions, approaches are required that describe and evaluate ESS in relation to the typologies and procedures of urban planners.
   ESS depend on the structural parameters of urban green spaces. In order to facilitate the analysis and evaluation of these parameters, a method has been sought to enable the detailed identification of ESS on the basis of urban vegetation structures. The so-called urban vegetation structure type (UVST) approach is based on the mapping of urban biotope types as well as an analysis of terrestrial and aerial photographs. It enables the identification and description of all areas within a city characterized by vegetation according to type, size, structural characterization as well as density, structure and building type. The analysis of vegetation structures and the determination of patterns of greenery were realized for the map of the urban biotope types of the City of Dresden, Germany. This led to the identification of 57 UVSTs, distinguished in terms of the level of soil-sealing, structure and type of building as well as the structure and amount of vegetation. By applying these UVSTs, average values for the amount of green space, the green volume and the proportion of sealed surface for the entire city as well as for urban districts can be determined. This provides a solid basis upon which to investigate diverse ESS and assess the ecological quality of urban structures.
   Climate change models predict that average temperatures are to rise. As densely built-up urban areas are particularly affected by such warming effects, planners need to take account of climate data in urban planning processes. An analysis of micro-climatic effects is offered by this paper as an example for the application of the introduced approach, particularly aimed at illustrating the differences between various urban vegetation structures concerning their micro-climatic effects. Selected results of climate modelling are presented, confirming clear differences in the micro-climatic effects of several UVSTs, both at city and urban-district level. The UVST approach is also appropriate for case studies concerning the micro-climatic impact of changes in land use at the urban-district level. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Lehmann, Iris; Mathey, Juliane; Roessler, Stefanie; Braeuer, Anne] Leibniz Inst Ecol Urban & Reg Dev, D-01217 Dresden, Germany.
   [Goldberg, Valeri] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Environm Sci, Inst Hydrol & Meteorol, Chair Meteorol, D-01737 Tharandt, Germany.
C3 Leibniz Institut fur okologische Raumentwicklung; Technische Universitat
   Dresden
RP Mathey, J (corresponding author), Leibniz Inst Ecol Urban & Reg Dev, Weberpl 1, D-01217 Dresden, Germany.
EM i.lehmann@ioer.de; j.mathey@ioer.de; S.Roessler@ioer.de;
   A.Braeuer@ioer.de; valeri.goldberg@tu-dresden.de
OI Goldberg, Valeri/0000-0002-9477-1652
CR Alexandria E, 2008, BUILD ENVIRON, V43, P480, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.055
   Ali-Toudert F, 2007, SOL ENERGY, V81, P742, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2006.10.007
   [Anonymous], 2012, URBAN ADAPTATION CLI
   Arlt G., 2005, AUSWIRKUNGEN STADTIS
   Arlt G., 2002, STADTOKOLOGISCHE QUA, P139
   Avissar R, 1996, ATMOS ENVIRON, V30, P437, DOI 10.1016/1352-2310(95)00013-5
   Bastian O, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V21, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.014
   Baums AB, 2005, METEOROL Z, V14, P211, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0024
   Blum A., 2010, TYPOLOGIEN GEBAUTEN
   Bochow M., 2010, URBAN BIODIVERSITY D, P255
   Bowler DE, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V97, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
   Breuste H.J., 2001, BEITRAGE UMWELT SOZI
   Bruse M, 1998, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V13, P373, DOI 10.1016/S1364-8152(98)00042-5
   Bruse M., 2003, LOBF MITTEILUNGEN, V1, P66
   Burkhard B, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V21, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
   Chen H, 2009, BUILD ENVIRON, V44, P2290, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.03.012
   Colding J, 2011, URBAN ECOLOGY: PATTERNS, PROCESSES, AND APPLICATIONS, P228
   Cowling RM, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P9483, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0706559105
   Daily GC, 2009, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V7, P21, DOI 10.1890/080025
   de Groot RS, 2010, ECOL COMPLEX, V7, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
   Dimoudi A, 2003, ENERG BUILDINGS, V35, P69, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00081-6
   Duhme F., 1992, STRUKTURTYPENKARTIER
   Endlicher W., 2008, URBAN ECOLOGY AN INT, P269
   Endlicher W., 2008, INFORMATIONEN ZUR RA, V6/7, P437
   Environment D.G., 2012, MULTIFUNCTIONALITY G
   Eum JH, 2013, LAND USE POLICY, V34, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.03.016
   Fischer B, 2008, ECOL MODEL, V214, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.02.037
   Gill S., 2009, Planning for Climate Change. Strategies for Mitigation and Adaptation for Spatial Planners, P249
   Gill SE, 2007, Built Environ, V33, P115, DOI [10.2148/benv.33.1.115, DOI 10.2148/BENV.33.1.115]
   Goldberg V, 2008, ANN GEOPHYS-GERMANY, V26, P1977, DOI 10.5194/angeo-26-1977-2008
   Goldberg V, 2001, ANN GEOPHYS, V19, P581, DOI 10.5194/angeo-19-581-2001
   Goldberg V., 2011, NATURSCHUTZ BIOL VIE, V111
   Gómez F, 2004, BUILD ENVIRON, V39, P1077, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.02.001
   Gómez F, 2001, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V55, P151, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00150-5
   Gómez-Muñoz VM, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V94, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.09.002
   Grossmann M., 1984, BODENFUNKTIONSZAHL G
   Haase D, 2013, OKOSYSTEMDIENSTLEIST, P232
   Hagen Katrin., 2010, URBAN BIODIVERSITY D, V1st, P572, DOI DOI 10.1002/-9781444318654.CH31
   Hall JM, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V104, P410, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.015
   Headache classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS), 2018, Cephalalgia, V38, P1, DOI [10.1177/0333102417738202, DOI 10.1177/0333102417738202, DOI 10.2833/9937]
   Hecht R, 2008, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V46, P3832, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2008.2001771
   Hege H.-P., 1998, SEM RAHM VER INSTR O
   Huttner S., 2008, USING ENVI MET SIMUL, V18, P307
   Kleerekoper L, 2012, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V64, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.06.004
   Lafortezza R, 2009, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V8, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.003
   Lakes T, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V13, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.05.016
   Naumann Sandra., 2011, Final Report to the European Commission, DG Environment
   Ng E, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V47, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.07.014
   Niemelä J, 2010, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V19, P3225, DOI 10.1007/s10531-010-9888-8
   Nohl W., 1993, HDB BEISPIELSAMMLUNG, P19
   OKE TR, 1989, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V324, P335, DOI 10.1098/rstb.1989.0051
   Pauleit S, 2011, URBAN ECOLOGY: PATTERNS, PROCESSES, AND APPLICATIONS, P19
   Rannow S, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V98, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.017
   Ren C, 2011, INT J CLIMATOL, V31, P2213, DOI 10.1002/joc.2237
   Schulte W., 1993, NATUR LANDSCHAFT, V68, P491
   Shashua-Bar L, 2000, ENERG BUILDINGS, V31, P221, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(99)00018-3
   Stewart ID, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P1879, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00019.1
   Su YF, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V107, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.016
   Tzoulas K, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
   Van Delm A, 2011, ECOL INDIC, V11, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.06.004
   von Haaren Christina, 2011, International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Management, V7, P150, DOI 10.1080/21513732.2011.616534
   Wende W, 2012, LANDSCAPE RES, V37, P483, DOI 10.1080/01426397.2011.592575
   Wende W, 2012, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V32, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.04.003
   WILMERS F, 1991, ENERG BUILDINGS, V15, P507
   Wong NH, 2007, BUILD ENVIRON, V42, P2949, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.06.004
NR 65
TC 112
Z9 122
U1 3
U2 198
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1470-160X
EI 1872-7034
J9 ECOL INDIC
JI Ecol. Indic.
PD JUL
PY 2014
VL 42
SI SI
BP 58
EP 72
DI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.036
PG 15
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA AI4II
UT WOS:000336828500007
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Alahmad, B
   Yuan, QN
   Achilleos, S
   Salameh, P
   Papatheodorou, SI
   Koutrakis, P
AF Alahmad, Barrak
   Yuan, Qinni
   Achilleos, Souzana
   Salameh, Pascale
   Papatheodorou, Stefania I.
   Koutrakis, Petros
TI Evaluating the temperature-mortality relationship over 16 years in
   Cyprus
SO JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
LA English
DT Article
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; AMBIENT-TEMPERATURE; AIR-TEMPERATURE; HEAT; WEATHER;
   CITIES; RISK; COLD
AB In many regions of the world, the relationship between ambient temperature and mortality is well-documented, but little is known about Cyprus, a Mediterranean island country where climate change is progressing faster than the global average. We Examined the association between daily ambient temperature and all-cause mortality risk in Cyprus. We conducted a time-series analysis with quasipoisson distribution and distributed lag non-linear models to investigate the association between temperature and all-cause mortality from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2019 in five districts in Cyprus. We then performed a meta-analysis to estimate the overall temperature-mortality dose-response relationship in Cyprus. Excess mortality was computed to determine the public health burden caused by extreme temperatures. We did not find evidence of heterogeneity between the five districts (p = 0.47). The pooled results show that for cold effects, comparing the 1st, 2.5th, and 5th percentiles to the optimal temperature (temperature associated with least mortality, 25 degree celsius), the overall relative risks of mortality were 1.55 (95% CI: 1.32, 1.82), 1.41 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.64), and 1.32 (95% CI: 1.15, 1.52), respectively. For heat effects, the overall relative risks of mortality at the 95th, 97.5th and 99th percentiles were 1.10 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.16), 1.17 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.29), and 1.29 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.5), respectively. The excess mortality attributable to cold days accounted for 8.0 deaths (95% empirical CI: 4.5-10.8) for every 100 deaths, while the excess mortality attributable to heat days accounted for 1.3 deaths (95% empirical CI: 0.7-1.7) for every 100 deaths. The results prompt additional research into environmental risk prevention in this under-studied hot and dry region that could experience disproportionate climate change related exposures.Implications: The quantification of excess mortality attributable to temperature extremes shows an urgent need for targeted public health interventions and climate adaptation strategies in Cyprus and similar regions facing rapid climate change. Future steps should look into subpopulation sensitivity, coping strategies, and adaptive interventions to reduce potential future risks.
C1 [Alahmad, Barrak; Yuan, Qinni; Koutrakis, Petros] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, 401 Pk Dr,4th floor, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
   [Alahmad, Barrak] Dasman Diabet Inst, Kuwait, Kuwait.
   [Achilleos, Souzana] Cyprus Univ Technol, Sch Hlth Sci, Limassol, Cyprus.
   [Achilleos, Souzana; Salameh, Pascale] Univ Nicosia Med Sch, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, Nicosia, Cyprus.
   [Papatheodorou, Stefania I.] Harvard Univ, Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA USA.
C3 Harvard University; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Dasman
   Diabetes Institute (DDI); Cyprus University of Technology; Harvard
   University; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
RP Alahmad, B (corresponding author), Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, 401 Pk Dr,4th floor, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
EM Balahmad@hsph.harvard.edu
RI ; Salameh, Pascale/F-9676-2011
OI Achilleos, Souzana/0000-0002-1688-9225; Alahmad,
   Barrak/0000-0002-9523-9537; Salameh, Pascale/0000-0002-4780-0772
FU Cyprus Harvard Internship Program in Environmental Health; Harvard
   Cyprus Endowment Fund on Environmental and Public Health; Ministry of
   Health of Cyprus
FX The study was supported by the Cyprus Harvard Internship Program in
   Environmental Health and the Harvard Cyprus Endowment Fund on
   Environmental and Public Health. The data used in this study was
   collected by the Health Monitoring Unit of the Ministry of Health of
   Cyprus. The ideas and opinions expressed herein are those of the author.
   Endorsement of these ideas and opinions by the Ministry of Health of
   Cyprus is not intended nor should it be inferred. The authors would also
   like to thank the Cyprus Department of Meteorology for providing the
   meteorological data and the Air Quality and Strategic Planning Section,
   Department of Labour Inspection, Ministry of Labour and Social Insurance
   in Cyprus for providing the air pollutants data.
CR Alahmad B, 2023, CIRCULATION, V147, P35, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061832
   Alahmad B, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V732, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139289
   Alahmad B, 2019, ENVIRON RES, V171, P278, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.029
   Analitis A, 2008, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V168, P1397, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwn266
   Anderson BG, 2009, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V20, P205, DOI 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318190ee08
   Basu R, 2002, EPIDEMIOL REV, V24, P190, DOI 10.1093/epirev/mxf007
   Basu R, 2009, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V8, DOI 10.1186/1476-069X-8-40
   Bhaskaran K, 2009, HEART, V95, P1746, DOI 10.1136/hrt.2009.175018
   Curriero FC, 2002, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V155, P80, DOI 10.1093/aje/155.1.80
   Cyprus S.S.O., 2021, CENSUS POPULATION HO
   El-Zein A, 2004, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V330, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.02.027
   Gasparrini A, 2010, STAT MED, V29, P2224, DOI 10.1002/sim.3940
   Gasparrini A, 2015, LANCET, V386, P369, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62114-0
   Gasparrini A, 2017, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V1, pE360, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30156-0
   Gasparrini A, 2014, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-14-55
   Guo YM, 2014, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V25, P781, DOI 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000165
   Heaviside C, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V569, P627, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.138
   Higgins JPT, 2003, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V327, P557, DOI 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
   IPCC A., 2022, IPCC 6 ASS REP
   Kouis P, 2016, IEEE MEDITERR ELECT
   Lelieveld J, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V114, P667, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0418-4
   Lubczynska MJ, 2015, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V14, DOI 10.1186/s12940-015-0025-8
   Ma WJ, 2015, ENVIRON RES, V137, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2014.11.016
   McMichael AJ, 2006, LANCET, V367, P859, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68079-3
   McMichael AJ, 2008, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V37, P1121, DOI 10.1093/ije/dyn086
   Nastos PT, 2012, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V108, P591, DOI 10.1007/s00704-011-0555-0
   Pantavou K, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph182413361
   Sera F, 2019, STAT MED, V38, P5429, DOI 10.1002/sim.8362
   Shen TF, 1998, AM J FOREN MED PATH, V19, P113, DOI 10.1097/00000433-199806000-00003
   Steenland K, 2006, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V17, P512, DOI 10.1097/01.ede.0000229155.05644.43
   Tsangari H, 2016, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V16, P1905, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0793-2
   Zachariadis T, 2014, ENERGY, V76, P899, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.001
   Zanobetti A, 2008, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V19, P563, DOI 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31816d652d
   Zittis G, 2022, REV GEOPHYS, V60, DOI 10.1029/2021RG000762
NR 34
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 0
U2 2
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
PI PHILADELPHIA
PA 530 WALNUT STREET, STE 850, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106 USA
SN 1096-2247
EI 2162-2906
J9 J AIR WASTE MANAGE
JI J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc.
PD JUN 2
PY 2024
VL 74
IS 6
BP 439
EP 448
DI 10.1080/10962247.2024.2345637
EA MAY 2024
PG 10
WC Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Meteorology &
   Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences
GA SS6W0
UT WOS:001216439800001
PM 38718302
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Stadelmann, G
   Portier, J
   Didion, M
   Rogiers, N
   Thürig, E
AF Stadelmann, Golo
   Portier, Jeanne
   Didion, Markus
   Rogiers, Nele
   Thurig, Esther
TI From Paris to Switzerland: Four Pathways to a Forest Reference Level
SO FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE
LA English
DT Article
DE forest reference level; FRL; forest model; MASSIMO; CMP; Yasso07;
   carbon; Paris Agreement
ID CARBON BUDGET; MODEL; SEQUESTRATION; GROWTH
AB Introduction: Among terrestrial ecosystems, forests represent large carbon stocks threatened by changing climatic conditions, deforestation, overexploitation, and forest degradation. Close to nature forestry may help forests to continue to acting as carbon sinks by promoting their resilience against disturbances. The EU decided to carry out carbon accounting of emissions and removals from managed forests under the Paris Agreement (PA) by using a projected Forest Reference Level (FRL) based on the continuation of recent management practices.</p>
   Methods: We developed four conceptual scenarios that could build the Swiss Forest Reference Level and performed simulations over 50 years using Swiss National Forest Inventory (NFI) data and the empirical forest model MASSIMO. To improve MASSIMO, we further developed a new tree species-specific model for small scale mortality that accounts for the Swiss NFI design. Then, using projected biomass and mortality from MASSIMO, carbon budgets of mineral soil, litter, and dead wood were estimated using the Yasso07 model.</p>
   Results: The U-shaped mortality model performed well (AUC 0.7). Small as well as large trees had the highest mortality probabilities, reflecting both young trees dying due to self-thinning and old trees from age, pests or abiotic influences. All scenarios matched their given harvesting and growing stock targets, whereby the share of broadleaves increased in all regions of Switzerland. This resulted in decreasing biomass growth, possibly due to a species shift from typically fast growing and more shade tolerant conifers to broadleaves. The CO2-balance of the conceptual scenarios ranged from 1.06 to -3.3 Mt CO2 a(-1) under Increased Harvesting and Recent Management Practices (RMP), respectively. Rotation periods are shortened under Increased Harvesting, which is an important climate adaptive management strategy, but forests were predicted to become a net carbon source. In contrast, RMP resulted in similar harvesting amounts and forests as carbon sinks, as reported in the past. Further, the RMP scenario does not involve political assumptions and reflects the idea of the CMP approach used by the EU member states, which makes it comparable to other countries. Therefore, we propose the scenario RMP as a suitable and ideal candidate for the Swiss FRL.</p>
C1 [Stadelmann, Golo; Portier, Jeanne; Didion, Markus; Thurig, Esther] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res WSL, Resource Anal Forest Resources & Management, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
   [Rogiers, Nele] Fed Off Environm, Forest Div, Bern, Switzerland.
C3 Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology Domain; Swiss Federal Institute
   for Forest, Snow & Landscape Research
RP Stadelmann, G (corresponding author), Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res WSL, Resource Anal Forest Resources & Management, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
EM gob.stadelmann@wsi.ch
RI Stadelmann, Golo/M-6103-2013; Esther, Thurig/E-1235-2017
OI Stadelmann, Golo/0000-0001-6466-0161; Esther, Thurig/0000-0002-7942-0395
FU Swiss Federal Office for the Environment
FX This study was performed with the support of Swiss Federal Office for
   the Environment.
CR Abegg M.., 2020, SWISS NATL FOREST IN
   [Anonymous], 2015, Adoption of the Paris Agreement
   [Anonymous], 2011, SWISS CLIM CHANG SCE
   Barreiro S, 2016, ANN FOREST SCI, V73, P823, DOI 10.1007/s13595-016-0564-3
   Bellassen V, 2010, ECOL MODEL, V221, P2458, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.07.008
   Brang P, 2014, FORESTRY, V87, P492, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpu018
   Braun M, 2016, CARBON MANAG, V7, P271, DOI 10.1080/17583004.2016.1230990
   Churkina G, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P269, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0462-4
   Didion M, 2014, ECOL MODEL, V291, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.028
   Didion M., 2019, DATA SOIL CARBON STO
   Didion M., 2019, DATA SOIL CARBON STO
   Didion M, 2019, MANAG FOR ECOSYST, V35, P281, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-19293-8_18
   Dorren L., 2015, Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen, V166, P16, DOI 10.3188/szf.2015.0016
   Fischer C., 2019, Swiss national forest inventory methods and models of the fourth assessment, DOI [10.1007/ 978-3- 030-19293-8, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-19293-8, 10.1007/978-3-030-19293-8]
   FOEN, 2016, REP FAC CALC ASS AM
   FOEN, 2020, NAT INV REP INCL REP
   FOEN, 2021, HARV WOOD PROD HWP S
   FOEN, 2013, FOR POL 2020 VIS OBJ
   FOEN (Federal Office for the Environment), 2021, SWITZ GREENH GAS INV
   Forsell N, 2019, CARBON BAL MANAGE, V14, DOI 10.1186/s13021-019-0125-9
   Friedlingstein P, 2019, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V11, P1783, DOI 10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019
   Fukuda M., 2014, REV SUPPL METH GOOD
   Grassi G, 2018, CARBON BAL MANAGE, V13, DOI 10.1186/s13021-018-0096-2
   Gusti M, 2020, FORESTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/f11080794
   Iversen P., 2014, UNDERSTANDING LAND U
   Jonsson R, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120478
   Kindermann G, 2010, AUSTRIAN J FOR SCI, V127, P147
   Larson AJ, 2015, ECOLOGY, V96, P2855, DOI 10.1890/15-0628.1
   Loisel J, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, P70, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-00944-0
   Lumley Thomas, 2024, CRAN
   Matala J, 2005, ECOL MODEL, V181, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.06.030
   Mehr J, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V131, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.026
   MeteoSwiss, 2016, MONTHL YEARL MEAN TE
   MeteoSwiss, 2016, Monthly and yearly precipitation: RhiresM and RhiresY
   Nabuurs GJ, 2018, CARBON BAL MANAGE, V13, DOI 10.1186/s13021-018-0107-3
   Nabuurs GJ, 2003, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V9, P152, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00570.x
   Perin J, 2021, ECOL MODEL, V440, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109382
   Pfister C., 1999, WETTERNACHHERSAGE 50
   Pilli R, 2017, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V14, P2387, DOI 10.5194/bg-14-2387-2017
   R Core Team, 2020, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
   Rantakari M, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V286, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.08.041
   Remund J., 2016, WALD KLIMAWANDEL GRU, P23
   Reyer CPO, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa5ef1
   Rohner B, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106903
   Rohner B, 2018, EUR J FOREST RES, V137, P29, DOI 10.1007/s10342-017-1087-7
   Schelhaas MJ, 2018, FOR ECOSYST, V5, DOI 10.1186/s40663-018-0133-3
   Schelhaas MJ, 2015, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V15, P1581, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0788-z
   Seidl R, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P395, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3303, 10.1038/nclimate3303]
   Stadelmann G., 2016, Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen, V167, P152
   Stadelmann G., ENVIRON SCI POLICY
   Stadelmann G., 2020, Schweizerische Zeitschrift Fur Forstwesen, V171, P124, DOI [10.3188/szf.2020.0124, DOI 10.3188/SZF.2020.0124]
   Stadelmann G, 2019, FORESTS, V10, DOI 10.3390/f10020094
   Stadelmann G, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V305, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.003
   Temperli C, 2020, FOR ECOSYST, V7, DOI 10.1186/s40663-020-00236-1
   Temperli C, 2017, EUR J FOREST RES, V136, P493, DOI 10.1007/s10342-017-1048-1
   Thees O, 2020, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105647
   Thürig E, 2005, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V210, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.030
   Thürig E, 2005, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V204, P51, DOI [10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.070, 10.1016/j.forceo.2004.07.070]
   Thurig E., 2019, ESTIMATING CARBON ST
   Thurig E., 2021, ESTIMATING CARBON ST
   Tuomi M, 2011, ECOL MODEL, V222, P709, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.10.025
   Tuomi M, 2009, ECOL MODEL, V220, P3362, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.05.016
   UNFCCC, 1998, UNFCCC KYOT PROT
   Usbeck T, 2010, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V150, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.08.010
   Valade A, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V405, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.009
   Vauhkonen J, 2019, ANN FOREST SCI, V76, DOI 10.1007/s13595-019-0863-6
   Werner F, 2010, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V13, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.10.004
   WESTOBY M, 1984, ADV ECOL RES, V14, P167, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60171-3
   Zell J, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V433, P771, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.11.052
NR 69
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 1
U2 10
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2624-893X
J9 FRONT FOR GLOB CHANG
JI Front. For. Glob. Change
PD SEP 29
PY 2021
VL 4
AR 685574
DI 10.3389/ffgc.2021.685574
PG 13
WC Ecology; Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry
GA WH1MS
UT WOS:000707451800001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Busker, T
   de Moel, H
   Haer, T
   Schmeits, M
   van den Hurk, B
   Myers, K
   Cirkel, DG
   Aerts, J
AF Busker, Tim
   de Moel, Hans
   Haer, Toon
   Schmeits, Maurice
   van den Hurk, Bart
   Myers, Kira
   Cirkel, Dirk Gijsbert
   Aerts, Jeroen
TI Blue-green roofs with forecast-based operation to reduce the impact of
   weather extremes
SO JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Green roof; Blue-green roof; Stormwater management; Flood risk; Heat
   stress; Climate adaptation
ID SEDUM; WATER; TEMPERATURE; MITIGATION; HEALTH
AB Conventional green roofs have often been criticised for their limited water buffer capacity during extreme rainfall events and for their susceptibility to droughts when additional irrigation is unavailable. One solution to these challenges is to create an extra blue water retention layer underneath the green layer. Blue-green roofs allow more stormwater to be stored, and the reservoir can act as a water source for the green layer throughout capillary rises. An automated valve regulates the water level of the system. It can be opened to drain water when extreme precipitation is expected. Therefore, the water buffer capacity of the system during extreme rainfall events can be maximised by integrating precipitation forecasts as triggers for the operation of the valve. However, the added value of this forecast-based operation is yet unknown. Accordingly, in this study, we design and evaluate a hydrological blue-green roof model that utilises precipitation forecasts. We test its performance to capture (extreme) precipitation and to increase evapotranspiration and evaporative cooling under a variety of precipitation forecast-based decision rules. We show that blue-green roofs can capture between 70 % and 97 % of extreme precipitation (>20 mm/h) when set to anticipate ensemble precipitation forecasts from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). This capture ratio is considerably higher than that of a conventional green roof without extra water retention (12 %) or that of a blue-green roof that does not use forecast information (i.e., valve always closed; 59 %). Moreover, blue-green roofs allow for high evapotranspiration rates relative to potential evapotranspiration on hot summer days (around 70 %), which is higher than from conventional green roofs (30 %). This serves to underscore the higher capacity of blue-green roofs to reduce heat stress. Using the city of Amsterdam as a case study, we show the high upscaling potential of the concept: on average, potentially suitable flat roofs cover 13.3 % of the total area of the catchments that are susceptible to pluvial flood risk. If the 90th percentile of the ECMWF forecast is used, an 84 % rainfall capture ratio can translate into capturing 11 % of rainfall in flood-prone urban catchments in Amsterdam.
C1 [Busker, Tim; de Moel, Hans; Haer, Toon; Schmeits, Maurice; van den Hurk, Bart; Myers, Kira; Aerts, Jeroen] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.
   [Schmeits, Maurice] Royal Netherlands Meteorol Inst KNMI, NL-3731 GA De Bilt, Netherlands.
   [van den Hurk, Bart; Aerts, Jeroen] Deltares, NL-2600 MH Delft, Netherlands.
   [Cirkel, Dirk Gijsbert] KWR Water Res Inst, NL-3433 PE Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
C3 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Royal Netherlands Meteorological
   Institute; Deltares
RP Busker, T (corresponding author), Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.
EM tim.busker@vu.nl
RI de Moel, Hans/L-1311-2013; van den Hurk, Bart/ABI-1654-2020; Aerts,
   Jeroen/M-8431-2013; Schmeits, Maurice/C-6260-2012
OI Busker, Tim/0000-0001-7860-9762; Schmeits, Maurice/0000-0002-0433-0774;
   de Moel, Hans/0000-0002-6826-1974; Haer, Toon/0000-0001-6172-2793; van
   den Hurk, Bart/0000-0003-3726-7086
FU RESILIO; European Regional Development Fund through the Urban Innovative
   Actions Initiative
FX This work is based on data from ECMWF and TIGGE, retrieved using the
   Meteorological Archival and Retrieval System (MARS). TIGGE (The
   Interactive Grand Global Ensemble) is an initiative of the World Weather
   Research Programme (WWRP). The research is funded by RESILIO; RESILIO is
   an acronym for `Resilience nEtwork of Smart Innovative cLImate-adapative
   rOoftops', a collaboration between the Municipality of Amsterdam,
   Waternet, MetroPolder company, Rooftop Revolution, HvA, VU, Stadgenoot,
   de Alliantie and De Key. This project is cofinanced by the European
   Regional Development Fund through the Urban Innovative Actions
   Initiative. We would like to thank MetroPolder company, in particular
   Merle van der Kroft and Joost Jacobi, for their help and support during
   this research project. In addition, we would like to thank ECWMF User
   Services for the excellent support on the use of ECMWF ensemble
   forecasts.
CR Aflaki A, 2017, CITIES, V62, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.003
   Alexandria E, 2008, BUILD ENVIRON, V43, P480, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.055
   Allen R.G., 1998, FAO Irrig. Drain. Pap., V56, P300, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0141-1187(05)80058-6
   Andenaes E, 2021, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/buildings11050185
   [Anonymous], 2016, Natural and Nature-Based Flood Management: A green guide 222
   [Anonymous], 2015, The Practice of Biophilic Design
   Attema Jisk., 2014, KNMI'14: Climate Change scenarios for the 21st Century - A Netherlands perspective
   Bougeault P, 2010, B AM METEOROL SOC, V91, P1059, DOI 10.1175/2010BAMS2853.1
   Buizza R., 2017, ECMWF NEWSL, DOI [10.21957/bv418o, DOI 10.21957/BV4180]
   Chan FKS, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V76, P772, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.005
   Cirkel DG, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10091253
   De Key, 2021, E COMMUNICATION
   Dutch government, 2021, BAS ADR GEB BAG
   Dutch government, 2017, ACT HOOGT NED AHN3
   ECMWF, 2021, ECMWF WEB API
   ESRI, 2021, MULT CLUST SPAT STAT
   GRAVATT DA, 1992, OECOLOGIA, V92, P532, DOI 10.1007/BF00317845
   Haiden T, 2019, EVALUATION ECMWF FOR
   Huang YJ, 2020, WIRES WATER, V7, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1421
   Imhoff RO, 2020, WATER RESOUR RES, V56, DOI 10.1029/2019WR026723
   INDLEKOFER H, 1975, J HYDR ENG DIV-ASCE, V101, P385
   Ireson AM, 2013, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V17, P2083, DOI 10.5194/hess-17-2083-2013
   JACKSON RD, 1981, WATER RESOUR RES, V17, P1133, DOI 10.1029/WR017i004p01133
   Kaspersen PS, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P4131, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-4131-2017
   KNMI, 2021, KLIM MET WAARN
   Kuronuma Takanori, 2017, Environmental Control in Biology, V55, P137, DOI 10.2525/ecb.55.137
   La Roche P, 2014, ENERG BUILDINGS, V82, P492, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.055
   Lee JY, 2015, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V152, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.028
   Liu W, 2021, J HYDROL, V602, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126786
   Manola I, 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V22, P3777, DOI 10.5194/hess-22-3777-2018
   Manso M, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110111
   Masson-Delmotte V., 2021, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, P41
   MetroPolder company, 2021, METROPOLDER CO POLD
   Mohajerani A, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V197, P522, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.095
   Monteith J.L., 2013, Principles of Environmental Physics, V4th
   Nagase A, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V97, P318, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.005
   Pelorosso Raffaele, 2021, Innovation in Urban and Regional Planning. Proceedings of the 11th INPUT Conference. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering (LNCE 146), P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-68824-0_1
   PENMAN HL, 1948, PROC R SOC LON SER-A, V193, P120, DOI 10.1098/rspa.1948.0037
   Pillosu F.M., 2020, NEW LOW COST TECHNIQ
   PILONSMITS EAH, 1991, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V137, P342, DOI 10.1016/S0176-1617(11)80143-4
   Razzaghmanesh M, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V15, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.013
   Redactie Rainproof, 2014, WOLKBR 28 JUL 2014
   RESILIO, 2020, SMART BLUE GREEN ROO
   Shafique M., 2016, NAT ENVIRON POLLUT T, V15, P715
   Skjeldrum PM, 2017, ENRGY PROCED, V132, P417, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.649
   Sluijter R., 2018, De droogte van 2018 Een analyse op basis van het potentile neerslagtekort
   Stovin V., 2015, DEFINING GREEN ROOF, P574, DOI [10.1080/1573062X.2015.1049279, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2015]
   Swinbank R, 2016, B AM METEOROL SOC, V97, P49, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00191.1
   Teotónio I, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102781
   The municipality of Amsterdam, 2021, RAINPR BOTTL MAP
   Tzoulas K, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
   van den Berg M, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P806, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.008
   Van Oldenborgh G. J., 2014, METEOROLOGICA, V3, P28
   Van Rijn A., 2020, THESIS
   VanWoert ND, 2005, HORTSCIENCE, V40, P659, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.40.3.659
   Viavattene C, 2013, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V67, P99, DOI 10.2166/wst.2012.537
   Waternet Tauw, 2017, VLAKK AMST
   WMO, 2021, SUMM EXTR FLOODS HEA
   WWA, 2021, W N AM EXTR HEAT VIR
   Yao L, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V268, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110707
   Yio MHN, 2013, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V68, P1477, DOI 10.2166/wst.2013.381
   Zhang SH, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112682
NR 62
TC 39
Z9 41
U1 3
U2 46
PU ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI LONDON
PA 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON NW1 7DX, ENGLAND
SN 0301-4797
EI 1095-8630
J9 J ENVIRON MANAGE
JI J. Environ. Manage.
PD JAN 1
PY 2022
VL 301
AR 113750
DI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113750
EA SEP 2021
PG 12
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA WD2RO
UT WOS:000704794800002
PM 34597953
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Liang, MS
   Julius, S
   Dong, ZF
   Neal, J
   Yang, YJ
AF Liang, Marissa S.
   Julius, Susan
   Dong, Zhifei
   Neal, Jill
   Yang, Y. Jeffrey
TI Assessing and managing design storm variability and projection
   uncertainty in a changing coastal environment
SO JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Design storm; System vulnerability; Climate projection; Water
   infrastructure; Coastal flooding; Climate adaptation
ID CHESAPEAKE-BAY; REGIONAL CLIMATE; ATMOSPHERIC RIVERS; EXTREME EVENTS;
   MODEL; PRECIPITATION; RAINFALL; NORTH; WATER; ATLANTIC
AB Coastal urban infrastructure and water management programs are vulnerable to the impacts of long-term hydroclimatic changes and to the flooding and physical destruction of disruptive hurricanes and storm surge. Water resilience or, inversely, vulnerability depends on design specifications of the storm and inundation, against which water infrastructure and environmental assets are planned and operated. These design attributes are commonly derived from statistical modeling of historical measurements. Here we argue for the need to carefully examine the approach and associated design vulnerability in coastal areas because of the future hydroclimatic changes and large variability at local coastal watersheds. This study first shows significant spatiotemporal variations of design storm in the Chesapeake Bay of the eastern U.S. Atlantic coast, where the low-frequency high-intensity precipitations vary differently to the tropical cyclones and local orographic effects. Average and gust wind speed exhibited much greater spatial but far less temporal variability than the precipitation. It is noteworthy that these local variabilities are not fully described by the regional gridded precipitation used in CMIP5 climate downscaling and by NOAA' s regional design guide Atlas-14. Up to 46.4% error in the gridded precipitation for the calibration period 1950-1999 is further exacerbated in the future design values by the ensemble of 132 CMIP5 projections. The total model projection error (delta(M)) up to -61.8% primarily comes from the precipitation regionalization (delta(1)), climate downscaling (delta(2)), and a fraction from empirical data modeling (delta(E)). Thus, a post-bias correction technique is necessary. The bias-corrected design wind speed for 10-yr to 30-yr storms has small changes <20% by the year 2100, but contains large spatial variations even for stations of close proximity. Bias-corrected design precipitations are characteristic of large spatial variability and a notable increase of 2-5 year precipitation in the future along western shores of the Lower and Middle Chesapeake Bay. All these accounts point to the potential vulnerability of water infrastructure and water program in coastal areas, when the hydrological design basis using regional values fails to account for significant spatiotemporal precipitation variations in local coastal watersheds.
C1 [Liang, Marissa S.] US EPA, ORD CPHEA, ORISE Postdoctoral Participants, 26W Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA.
   [Julius, Susan] US EPA, ORD CPHEA, 1200 Penn Ave NW, Washington, DC 20460 USA.
   [Dong, Zhifei] Aptim Inc, Coastal Ports & Marine Div, 2481 NW Boca Raton Blvd, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA.
   [Neal, Jill; Yang, Y. Jeffrey] US EPA, ORD CESER, US EPA 26W Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA.
C3 United States Environmental Protection Agency; United States
   Environmental Protection Agency; United States Environmental Protection
   Agency
RP Yang, YJ (corresponding author), US EPA, ORD CESER, US EPA 26W Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA.
EM yang.jeff@epa.gov
FU EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD)
FX We acknowledge constructive and detailed comments from the
   peerreviewers. The research underpinning this paper is funded and
   conducted under the Air-Energy national research program managed by the
   EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD). Any opinions expressed in
   this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect
   the views of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or Oak Ridge
   Institute for Science and Education; therefore, no official endorsement
   should be inferred.
CR Al Mamoon A, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V86, P281, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2687-0
   [Anonymous], 2008, PROBABILITY DISTRIBU, DOI DOI 10.1061/40976(316)585
   Arnbjerg-Nielsen K, 2013, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V68, P16, DOI 10.2166/wst.2013.251
   ASCE, 2014, Standard ASCE/SEI 7-10, VThird
   Barnard PL, 2017, NAT COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1038/ncomms14365
   Beniston M, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V81, P71, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9226-z
   Benson M.A., 1962, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1580-A, P30
   Bhattachan A, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V90, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.006
   Bonnin G.M., 2006, PRECIPITATION FREQUE, V1
   Bordoy R, 2013, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V52, P82, DOI 10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0149.1
   Brekke L., 2013, Downscaled CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate projections: Release of downscaled CMIP5 climate projections, comparison with preceding information, and summary of user needs, P1
   Brown Casey, 2012, WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, V48, DOI DOI 10.1029/2011WR011212
   Chang NB, 2017, ATMOS RES, V193, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.04.018
   CHANGNON D, 1994, INT J CLIMATOL, V14, P165, DOI 10.1002/joc.3370140204
   Cheng L, 2014, SCI REP-UK, V4, DOI 10.1038/srep04814
   Church J.A., 2013, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
   COLMAN SM, 1988, MAR GEOL, V83, P95, DOI 10.1016/0025-3227(88)90054-0
   Cook R., 2011, ASCE 7 10 WIND LOADS, P1440
   Cooley D, 2007, J AM STAT ASSOC, V102, P824, DOI 10.1198/016214506000000780
   Eiras-Barca J, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V121, P931, DOI 10.1002/2015JD023379
   England J.F., 2018, Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency-Bulletin, P4, DOI [DOI 10.3133/TM4B5, 10.3133/tm4b5]
   Fletcher SM, 2017, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V143, DOI [10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000823, 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000823]
   Flynn T.J., 1984, Greenhouse Effect and Sea Level Rise: A Challenge for This Generation, P271
   Fowler HJ, 2005, J HYDROL, V300, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.017
   Gershunov A, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P7900, DOI 10.1002/2017GL074175
   Griffis VW, 2004, WATER RESOUR RES, V40, DOI 10.1029/2003WR002697
   Ho JT, 2016, HYDROLOG SCI J, V61, P551, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2015.1057513
   Hobbs CH, 2004, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V23, P641, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2003.08.003
   Hosseinzadehtalaei P, 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P1105, DOI 10.1002/joc.5069
   Hourdin F, 2013, CLIM DYNAM, V40, P2193, DOI 10.1007/s00382-012-1343-y
   Hsiang S, 2017, SCIENCE, V356, P1362, DOI 10.1126/science.aal4369
   Kirwan ML, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P253, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2909
   Konrad CE, 1997, WEATHER FORECAST, V12, P557, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(1997)012<0557:SSFAWW>2.0.CO;2
   Laflamme EM, 2016, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V12, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2015.12.001
   Levine AD, 2016, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V7, P485, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2016.011
   Li M, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P2127, DOI 10.1002/2015GL067334
   Liang X, 1994, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V99, P14415, DOI 10.1029/94JD00483
   Liang X, 1996, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V13, P195, DOI 10.1016/0921-8181(95)00046-1
   Liu MF, 2018, J CLIMATE, V31, P7269, DOI [10.1175/jcli-d-17-0747.1, 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0747.1]
   Love R, 2016, EARTHS FUTURE, V4, P440, DOI 10.1002/2016EF000363
   Marciano CG, 2015, J CLIMATE, V28, P468, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00418.1
   Maurer EP, 2002, J CLIMATE, V15, P3237, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<3237:ALTHBD>2.0.CO;2
   McDaniels T, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.03.001
   Miao CY, 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/9/5/055007
   Milman A, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P758, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.002
   Morris JT, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P2869, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2869:ROCWTR]2.0.CO;2
   Olsen J. R., 2015, AD INFR CIV ENG PRAC
   Paul S, 2019, GEOSCIENCES, V9, DOI 10.3390/geosciences9020058
   Persechino A, 2013, CLIM DYNAM, V40, P2359, DOI 10.1007/s00382-012-1466-1
   Ralph FM, 2016, B AM METEOROL SOC, V97, P1209, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00043.1
   Reidmiller D. R., 2018, Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, VII, DOI [DOI 10.7930/NCA4.2018, 10.7930/NCA4.2018]
   Reyers M, 2015, INT J CLIMATOL, V35, P229, DOI 10.1002/joc.3975
   Rice KC, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V204, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.057
   Rice KC, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V128, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1295-9
   Rosenzweig Cynthia, 2014, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, V111, P3268, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1222463110
   Sankarasubramanian A, 1999, J HYDROL, V218, P13, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00018-9
   Simiu E., 2011, Design of Buildings for Wind - A Guide for ASCE 7-10 Standard Users and Designers of Special Structures, V2nd
   van Hengstum PJ, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep21728
   Villarini G, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P604, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1530
   VOGEL RM, 1993, J WATER RES PL-ASCE, V119, P353, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1993)119:3(353)
   Wahl T, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P1093, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2736, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2736]
   Watt E, 2013, CAN J CIVIL ENG, V40, P105, DOI 10.1139/cjce-2011-0594
   Wuebbles D. J., 2017, Climate science special report: Fourth national climate assessment, VI
   Yang Y.J., 2008, EWRI 2008 C HON HAW
   Yang Y.J., 2016, SUSTAINABLE WATER MA, VI
   Yang YJ, 2014, CURR OPIN CHEM ENG, V5, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.coche.2014.03.006
   Zhou ZX, 2019, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V98, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.018
   Zilli MT, 2019, CLIM DYNAM, V52, P2545, DOI 10.1007/s00382-018-4277-1
NR 68
TC 5
Z9 6
U1 0
U2 17
PU ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI LONDON
PA 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON NW1 7DX, ENGLAND
SN 0301-4797
EI 1095-8630
J9 J ENVIRON MANAGE
JI J. Environ. Manage.
PD JUN 15
PY 2020
VL 264
AR 110494
DI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110494
PG 13
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA LJ5WE
UT WOS:000530234700064
PM 32250914
OA Green Accepted, Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Brinks, P
AF Brinks, Pascal
GP ASHRAE
TI Energy Performance of Industrial Steel Buildings in Different Climates
SO SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EFFICIENT BUILDING DESIGN: MATERIALS
   AND HVAC EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT 2nd International Conference on Efficient Building Design - Materials
   and HVAC Equipment Technologies
CY SEP 22-23, 2016
CL Amer Univ Beirut, Beirut, LEBANON
SP ASHRAE, ASHRAE Lebanese Chapter, Amer Univ Beirut, Munib & Angela Masri Inst Energy & Nat Resources, OEA, Iklimlendirme Sanayii Ihracatcilari Birligi, Daikin, Camfil, AHRI, Dar Al Handasah Consultants, Al Salem Johnson Controls, KA KhatiBalami
HO Amer Univ Beirut
AB The origin of the industrial steel building industry is in the US and Europe. Here large industrial steel halls have a long tradition and the building design was adapted to the climate in these western regions. With an increasing industrial development of other regions also their demand for industrial buildings raised in the last years. Such emerging markets are often located in very different climates, which should be respected better by the building designers. However, little knowledge in energy efficient building design and missing building regulations in many emerging markets cause the opposite. Industrial steel buildings are often imported by European or American suppliers without any climate adaptation. This leads to a non-optimal energy performance and discomfort in the buildings. In practice such drawback is often compensated by oversized HVAC systems, causing high investments and energy costs and increase the carbon emissions.
   For a better assessment of the most important climate sensitive building parameters, extensive building energy simulations were carried out. Such simulations covered the air infiltration using an air flow network model, ground interaction by linking the building simulation to a transient finite difference model of the ground and solar optimization of window and sky light orientation. To gain input data for the simulation of air infiltration, first extensive measurements of the leakages in typical industrial buildings were carried out. For this purpose an air tightness test stand was build and moreover fan pressurization tests in whole buildings were executed. The assessment was carried out for hot climates such as North Africa, for cold regions such as different locations in Russia and for climates with hot summers and cold winters such as Turkey. The simulation results were compared to the energy performance in the origin climate (Central Europe).
   The outcomes of this study are concepts for improving the energy performance of industrial steel buildings exported to different countries, which still have a lack of experience and regulations for energy efficient building design. In addition a focus was on design aspects for damage free building constructions regarding building physics. As the climate has a huge impact on the humidity transport in building components this aspect was also crucial to consider for the design of optimized building components.
C1 [Brinks, Pascal] Co Astron Bldg, Diekirch, Luxembourg.
RP Brinks, P (corresponding author), Co Astron Bldg, Diekirch, Luxembourg.
FU Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg (FNR); FNR; TU Kaiserslautern
FX The presented research was carried out with financial support by the
   Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg (FNR) in framework of the PhD
   project "Concepts for Nearly Zero-Energy Industrial Buildings" at
   Technical University Kaiserslautern, Germany. We thank the FNR and the
   TU Kaiserslautern for the support.
CR [Anonymous], 2003, Thermal performance of windows, doors and shading devices - Detailed calculations
   Brinks P, 2015, THESIS
   Brinks P, 2015, P WORLD SUST EN DAYS
   Brinks P, 2016, APPL ENERG, V173, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.007
   Brinks P, 2015, ENERG BUILDINGS, V86, P663, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.040
   DIN, 2013, DIN, 4108-2
   Kuhnhenne M, 2009, THESIS
   Oschatz B, 2012, GESAMTANALYSE ENERGI
   Zirkelbach D, WUFI PROMANUAL
NR 9
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 1
PU AMER SOC HEATING, REFRIGERATING AND AIR-CONDITIONING ENGS
PI ATLANTA
PA 1791 TULLIE CIRCLE NE, ATLANTA, GA 30329 USA
BN 978-1-939200-49-5
PY 2016
BP 77
EP 84
PG 8
WC Construction & Building Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Energy & Fuels
GA BM6BM
UT WOS:000466365700010
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Kim, E
   Donohue, K
AF Kim, Eunsuk
   Donohue, Kathleen
TI Local adaptation and plasticity of Erysimum capitatum to altitude: its
   implications for responses to climate change
SO JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE alpine; climate change; Erysimum capitatum; establishment; germination;
   local adaptation; natural selection; phenotypic plasticity; plant
   development and life-history traits
ID ALPINE PLANT; SELECTION; GRADIENT; EVOLUTION; PATTERNS; DROUGHT;
   DIFFERENTIATION; GERMINATION; EXPRESSION; PHENOLOGY
AB Alpine plants are at high risk because of climate change. Assessing the performance of alpine plant species across different altitudes is useful for predicting how they may respond to changing climate. Adaptation and plasticity of early life stages are of particular interest since seed germination and seedling establishment could be crucial life-history stages for environmental tracking and population persistence of sexually reproducing plants. To evaluate past adaptation and the potential to accommodate future climate conditions, seeds and seedlings of Erysimum capitatum were reciprocally transplanted between alpine and low-altitude sites. When grown in a common field environment, E. capitatum from alpine and lower-altitude populations differed from each other in germination, size and morphological traits. Planting altitude also influenced those traits, indicating that population differentiation and plasticity to altitudinal conditions both contributed to differences in the performance of high- vs. low-altitude plants. Seeds tended to germinate more in their native habitat than in the foreign habitat. Alpine plants survived more than low-altitude plants at high altitude, and they suffered higher mortality when they were planted in low-altitude sites. The production of multiple rosettes, a characteristic morphology of alpine E. capitatum, was negatively associated with survival at low altitude. In contrast to alpine populations, a survival advantage of low-altitude populations in low-altitude sites was not evident in this experiment. Synthesis. Because climate change is projected to cause alpine environments to become more similar to low-altitude environments, alpine Erysimum capitatum is expected to suffer reduced seedling recruitment and higher mortality as a direct response to altered environment and possibly as a result of past adaptation to high altitude. In particular, the production of multiple rosettes, an adaptive trait to the current alpine environment, would constrain plant survival should those environments come to resemble low altitude. Moreover, the limited fitness advantage of low-altitude E. capitatum in low-altitude conditions suggests that environmental tracking by low-altitude populations might have a limited role in maintaining future populations.
C1 [Kim, Eunsuk] Harvard Univ, Dept Organism & Evolutionary Biol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA.
   [Donohue, Kathleen] Duke Univ, Dept Biol, Durham, NC 27708 USA.
C3 Harvard University; Duke University
RP Kim, E (corresponding author), Univ S Carolina, Dept Biol Sci, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
EM eunsukkim@sc.edu
RI Kim, Eunsuk/A-5177-2013
OI Kim, Eunsuk/0000-0001-8059-7334
FU Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology at Harvard University;
   Sigma Xi travel grant
FX The authors are grateful to N. Pierce for her support and comments
   throughout this experiment. We thank W. Bowman at the University of
   Colorado Mountain Research Center, S. J. Popovich at the USDA Forest
   Service, C. Wanner at Boulder Co. Parks and Open Space, Jefferson County
   Open Space and C. Dawson at the Bureau of Land Management in Gunnison
   Co. for their support in getting research permits. We also thank two
   anonymous referees for providing valuable comments on a previous version
   of the manuscript. Funding was provided by the Department of Organismic
   and Evolutionary Biology at Harvard University and a Sigma Xi travel
   grant.
CR Allison PD., 2010, SURVIVAL ANAL USING
   Anderson JT, 2012, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V279, P3843, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2012.1051
   [Anonymous], 2021, ALPINE PLANT LIFE FU
   [Anonymous], 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007
   [Anonymous], EXPT STUDIES NATURE
   [Anonymous], 2007, CONTRIBUTION WORKING
   [Anonymous], ADAPTATION
   ATCHLEY WR, 1987, EVOLUTION, V41, P316, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05800.x
   Baskin CC, 2014, SEEDS: ECOLOGY, BIOGEOGRAPHY, AND EVOLUTION OF DORMANCY AND GERMINATION, 2ND EDITION, P1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-416677-6.00001-9
   Bliss L. C., 1971, Annual review of ecology and systematics. Volume 2., P405, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.02.110171.002201
   Byars SG, 2007, EVOLUTION, V61, P2925, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00248.x
   Calanca P, 2007, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V57, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.11.001
   Chaves MM, 2003, FUNCT PLANT BIOL, V30, P239, DOI 10.1071/FP02076
   Dinnétz P, 2002, PLANT ECOL, V159, P61, DOI 10.1023/A:1015593311183
   Donohue K, 2005, EVOLUTION, V59, P740, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01752.x
   Donohue K, 2010, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V41, P293, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144715
   Etterson JR, 2004, EVOLUTION, V58, P1446, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01726.x
   Fox G.A., 2001, Design and analysis of ecological experiments, P253, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781003059813
   Gauthier P, 1998, NEW PHYTOL, V139, P741, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00232.x
   Giménez-Benavides L, 2007, ANN BOT-LONDON, V99, P723, DOI [10.1093/aol/mcm007, 10.1093/aob/mcm007]
   Gonzalo-Turpin H, 2009, J ECOL, V97, P742, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01509.x
   HARTE J, 1995, ECOL APPL, V5, P132, DOI 10.2307/1942058
   HOLT RD, 1990, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V5, P311, DOI 10.1016/0169-5347(90)90088-U
   Inouye DW, 2008, ECOLOGY, V89, P353, DOI 10.1890/06-2128.1
   Jump AS, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P1010, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00796.x
   [Karl RT. U. S. Global Change Research Program U. S. Global Change Research Program], 2009, GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANG
   Kawecki TJ, 2004, ECOL LETT, V7, P1225, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00684.x
   Kim E, 2012, FUNCT ECOL, V26, P294, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01936.x
   Kim E, 2011, AM J BOT, V98, P1752, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1100194
   Kim E, 2011, J ECOL, V99, P1237, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01831.x
   Lambrecht SC, 2007, NEW PHYTOL, V173, P121, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01892.x
   LANDE R, 1983, EVOLUTION, V37, P1210, DOI [10.2307/2408842, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x]
   Marcante S, 2009, ANN BOT-LONDON, V103, P1129, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcp047
   Mojica JP, 2010, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V277, P2945, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.0568
   Mutel CorneliaFleisher., 1992, From Grassland to Glacier: The Natural History of Colorado and the Surrounding Region, V2nd
   Parmesan C, 2006, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V37, P637, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
   Poorter L, 2007, AM NAT, V169, P433, DOI 10.1086/512045
   Price R. A., 1987, THESIS U CALIFORNIA
   Rollins RC., 1993, CRUCIFERAE CONTINENT
   SCHLUTER D, 1991, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V246, P11, DOI 10.1098/rspb.1991.0118
   SCHUPP EW, 1995, AM J BOT, V82, P399, DOI 10.2307/2445586
   SVENSSON BM, 1993, J ECOL, V81, P635, DOI 10.2307/2261662
   TAYLOR RV, 1994, ARCTIC ALPINE RES, V26, P14, DOI 10.2307/1551871
   Theurillat JP, 2001, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V50, P77, DOI 10.1023/A:1010632015572
   Thomas CD, 2004, NATURE, V427, P145, DOI 10.1038/nature02121
   Walther GR, 2002, NATURE, V416, P389, DOI 10.1038/416389a
NR 46
TC 78
Z9 96
U1 10
U2 263
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0022-0477
EI 1365-2745
J9 J ECOL
JI J. Ecol.
PD MAY
PY 2013
VL 101
IS 3
BP 796
EP 805
DI 10.1111/1365-2745.12077
PG 10
WC Plant Sciences; Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 134CH
UT WOS:000318186800025
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Scott, D
   McBoyle, G
   Mills, B
AF Scott, D
   McBoyle, G
   Mills, B
TI Climate change and the skiing industry in southern Ontario (Canada):
   exploring the importance of snowmaking as a technical adaptation
SO CLIMATE RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; skiing; adaptation; snowmaking; Canada
AB The winter tourism industry has been repeatedly identified as potentially vulnerable to global climate change. Climate change impact assessments of ski areas in Australia, Europe and North America all project negative consequences for the industry. An important limitation of earlier studies has been the incomplete consideration of snowmaking as a climate adaptation strategy. Recognising that snowmaking is an integral component of the ski industry, this study examined how current and improved snowmaking capacity affects the vulnerability of the ski industry in southern Ontario (Canada) to climate variability and change. A 17 yr record of daily snow conditions and operations from a primary ski area in the region was used to calibrate a ski season simulation model that included a snowmaking module with climatic thresholds and operational decision rules based on interviews with ski area managers. Climate change scenarios (2020s, 2050s, 2080s) were developed by downscaling climate variables from 4 general circulation models (using both IS92a and SIZES emission scenarios) with the LARS weather generator (parameterized to local climate stations) for input into a daily snow depth simulation model. In contrast to earlier studies, the results indicate that ski areas in the region could remain operational in a warmer climate, particularly within existing business planning and investment time horizons (into the 2020s), The economic impact of additional snowmaking requirements remains an important uncertainty. Under climate change scenarios and current snowmaking technology, the average ski season at the case study ski area was projected to reduce by 0-16 % in the 2020s, 7-32 % in the 2050s and 11-50 % in the 2080s. Concurrent with the projected ski season losses, the estimated amount of snowmaking required increased by 36-144 % in the scenarios for the 2020s. Required snowmaking amounts increased by 48-187 % in the scenarios for the 2020s. The ability of individual ski areas to absorb additional snowmaking costs and remain economically viable in addition to the relative impact of climate change on other nearby ski regions (Quebec, Michigan and Vermont) remain important avenues of further research. The findings reveal the importance of examining a wide range of climate change scenarios and the necessity of including snowmaking and other adaptation strategies in future climate change vulnerability assessments of the ski industry and winter tourism in other regions of the world.
C1 Univ Waterloo, Adaptat & Impacts Res Grp, Fac Environm Studies, Environm Canada, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
   Univ Waterloo, Dept Geog, Fac Environm Studies, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
C3 Environment & Climate Change Canada; University of Waterloo; University
   of Waterloo
RP Univ Waterloo, Adaptat & Impacts Res Grp, Fac Environm Studies, Environm Canada, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
EM dj2scott@fes.uwaterloo.ca
RI Scott, Daniel/AAB-6190-2020
OI Mills, Brian/0000-0003-0968-8430; Scott, Daniel/0000-0001-7825-9301
CR *ACACIA, 2000, ASS POT EFF AD CLIM, P217
   Agnew M.D., 2001, TOUR HOSP RES, V3, P37, DOI DOI 10.1177/146735840100300104
   [Anonymous], DS883 ATM ENV SERV
   [Anonymous], DEP GEOGRAPHY PUBLIC
   [Anonymous], SNOW HYDR
   BREILING M, 1997, 971 I LANDSC PLANN
   Brown RD, 1998, ATMOS OCEAN, V36, P37, DOI 10.1080/07055900.1998.9649605
   *CAN SKI COUNC, 2000, RISK MANAGE, V46, P1
   Crowe R., 1973, The Tourist and Outdoor Recreation Climate of Ontario, Volume 1: Objectives and definitions of season, V1
   Elsasser H, 2002, CLIMATE RES, V20, P253, DOI 10.3354/cr020253
   Galloway R.W., 1988, GREENHOUSE, P428, DOI [10.1071/9780643105041, DOI 10.1071/9780643105041]
   Harrison SJ, 1999, TOURISM MANAGE, V20, P203, DOI 10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00072-7
   *IPCC, 2000, 3 IPCC
   *IPCC, 2001, UN INT PAN CLIM CHAN, P769
   Koenig U., 1997, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, V5, P46, DOI 10.1080/09669589708667275
   Konig U, 1998, WIRTSCHAFTSGEOGRAPHI, V28
   LAMOTHE, 1998, CLIMATE CHANGE DIGES, V8803
   LYNCH P, 1981, CANADIAN CLIMATE REV, P45
   MACDONALD J, 1988, TORONTO STAR    1222, pD6
   Maddison D, 2001, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V49, P193, DOI 10.1023/A:1010742511380
   McBoyle G.R., 1992, MOUNTAIN RESORT DEV, P70
   *MET SERV CAN, 1999, CAN DAIL CLIM DAT ON
   *MET SERV CAN, 2000, CAN SNOW DAT CD ROM
   ORDOWER M, 1995, INVESTIGATING SENSIT
   Perry A., 1997, APPL CLIMATOLOGY, P240
   Semenov MA, 1998, CLIMATE RES, V10, P95, DOI 10.3354/cr010095
   Smith K., 1993, Weather, V48, P398, DOI 10.1002/j.1477-8696.1993.tb05828.x
   SMITH K, 1990, TOURISM CLIMATE CHAN, P176
   Wall G., 1992, Tourism alternatives: potentials and problems in the development of tourism., P194
   Zeng LX, 2000, B AM METEOROL SOC, V81, P2075, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<2075:WDAWIC>2.3.CO;2
NR 30
TC 245
Z9 267
U1 5
U2 93
PU INTER-RESEARCH
PI OLDENDORF LUHE
PA NORDBUNTE 23, D-21385 OLDENDORF LUHE, GERMANY
SN 0936-577X
EI 1616-1572
J9 CLIM RES
JI Clim. Res.
PD JAN 31
PY 2003
VL 23
IS 2
BP 171
EP 181
DI 10.3354/cr023171
PG 11
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA 671UD
UT WOS:000182481700007
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Cerri, CEP
   Cherubin, MR
   Villela, JM
   Locatelli, JL
   Carvalho, ML
   Villarreal, F
   Mello, FFD
   Ibrahim, MA
   Lal, R
AF Cerri, Carlos Eduardo Pellegrino
   Cherubin, Mauricio Roberto
   Villela, Joao Marcos
   Locatelli, Jorge Luiz
   Carvalho, Martha Lustosa
   Villarreal, Federico
   Mello, Francisco Fujita de Castro
   Ibrahim, Muhammad Akbar
   Lal, Rattan
TI Carbon farming in the living soils of the Americas
SO FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE soil C sequestration; climate mitigation; greenhouse gas; agriculture;
   climate adaptation; soil health; soil organic matter; food systems
ID GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; MITIGATE; SYSTEMS; STOCKS; SEQUESTRATION;
   SUSTAINABILITY; OPPORTUNITIES; AGRICULTURE; DYNAMICS; IMPACTS
AB Soil represents Earth's largest terrestrial reservoir of carbon (C) and is an important sink of C from the atmosphere. However, the potential of adopting best management practices (BMPs) to increase soil C sequestration and offset greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in agroecosystems remains unclear. Synthesizing available information on soil C sink capacity is important for identifying priority areas and systems to be monitored, an essential step to properly estimate large-scale C sequestration potential. This study brings an overview of thousands of research articles conducted in the Americas and presents the current state-of-the-art on soil C research. Additionally, it estimates the large-scale BMPs adoption impact over soil C dynamics in the region. Results indicated that soil C-related terms are widely cited in the literature. Despite that, from a total of similar to 13 thousand research articles recovered in the systematic literature review, only 9.2% evaluated soil C (at any depth), and only 4.6% measured soil C for the 0-30 cm soil layer, mostly conducted in North and South America regions. Literature review showed a low occurrence of terms related to BMPs (e.g., cover cropping), suggesting a research gap on the subject. Estimates revealed that upscaling of BMPs over 30% of agricultural land area (334 Mha) of the Americas can lead to soil C sequestration of 13.1 (+/- 7.1) Pg CO(2)eq over 20 years, offsetting similar to 39% of agricultural GHG emissions over the same period. Results suggest that efforts should be made to monitor the impact of cropping system on soil C dynamics on the continents, especially in regions where data availability is low (e.g., Central, Caribbean, and Andean regions). Estimating the available degraded area for the continent and the soil C sequestration rates under BMPs adoption for Central, Andean, and Caribbean regions were major shortcomings encountered in our analysis. Thus, it is expected that some degree of uncertainty may be associated with the obtained results. Despite these limitations, upscaling of BMPs across the Americas suggests having great potential for C removal from the atmosphere and represents a global positive impact in terms of climate change mitigation and adaptation.
C1 [Cerri, Carlos Eduardo Pellegrino; Cherubin, Mauricio Roberto; Villela, Joao Marcos; Locatelli, Jorge Luiz; Carvalho, Martha Lustosa] Univ Sao Paulo, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, Dept Soil Sci, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
   [Cerri, Carlos Eduardo Pellegrino; Cherubin, Mauricio Roberto] Univ Sao Paulo, Ctr Carbon Res Trop Agr CCARBON, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
   [Villarreal, Federico; Mello, Francisco Fujita de Castro; Ibrahim, Muhammad Akbar] Inter Amer Inst Cooperat Agr, San Jose, Costa Rica.
   [Lal, Rattan] Ohio State Univ, CFAES Rattan Lal Ctr Carbon Management & Sequestra, Sch Environm, Columbus, OH USA.
C3 Universidade de Sao Paulo; Universidade de Sao Paulo; University System
   of Ohio; Ohio State University
RP Cerri, CEP (corresponding author), Univ Sao Paulo, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, Dept Soil Sci, Sao Paulo, Brazil.; Cerri, CEP (corresponding author), Univ Sao Paulo, Ctr Carbon Res Trop Agr CCARBON, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
EM cepcerri@usp.br
RI Locatelli, Jorge/AAH-3790-2019; Villela, João/L-8723-2017; Cherubin,
   Mauricio/A-6896-2016
FU Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA); Sao
   Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2023/09533-3]; FAPESP [2021/14989-0,
   2022/13531-3]; Center for Carbon Research in Tropical Agriculture
   (CCARBON) - FAPESP [2021/10573-4]; CNPq [311787/2021-5]
FX We would like to thank the Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on
   Agriculture (IICA) and all the public and private partners supporting
   the Living Soils of the Americas initiative, especially Director General
   Manuel Otero for his leadership and guidance. In addition, we thank the
   support of the Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for providing
   scholarships (JV - FAPESP grant #2023/09533-3; JL - FAPESP grant
   #2021/14989-0; MLC - FAPESP grant #2022/13531-3) and funding through the
   Center for Carbon Research in Tropical Agriculture (CCARBON) - FAPESP
   grant #2021/10573-4. MRC thanks the CNPq for his Research Productivity
   Fellowship (grant #311787/2021-5).
CR Abohassan RA., 2004, Carbon Dynamics in a Temperate Agroforestry System in Southern Canada
   Alavi-Murillo G, 2022, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V22, DOI 10.1007/s10113-022-01980-6
   Amelung W, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-18887-7
   [Anonymous], 2015, Status of the World's Soil Resources
   [Anonymous], 1992, Proceedings of the Ad-hoc Expert Group Meeting to Discuss Global Soil Databases and Appraisal of GLASOD/SOTER, February 24-28
   [Anonymous], 2022, Climate Change and Land: IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems
   Bai XX, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P2591, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14658
   Beillouin D, 2023, NAT COMMUN, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-39338-z
   Berner RA, 2003, NATURE, V426, P323, DOI 10.1038/nature02131
   Blanco-Canqui H, 2020, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V84, P1527, DOI 10.1002/saj2.20129
   Bongaarts J, 2019, POPUL DEV REV, V45, P680, DOI 10.1111/padr.12283
   Bossio DA, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P391, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-0491-z
   Bown MJ, 2010, EUR J VASC ENDOVASC, V40, P669, DOI 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.07.011
   Brantley SL, 2007, ELEMENTS, V3, P307, DOI 10.2113/gselements.3.5.307
   Brazil, 2023, Agricultura de Baixa Emissao de Carbono
   Button ES, 2022, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V170, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108697
   Cezar RM, 2021, BRAZ J MICROBIOL, V52, P2169, DOI 10.1007/s42770-021-00578-0
   Chatterjee N, 2020, FORESTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/f11010049
   Chenu C, 2019, SOIL TILL RES, V188, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2018.04.011
   Conant RT, 2017, ECOL APPL, V27, P662, DOI 10.1002/eap.1473
   Crippa M, 2021, NAT FOOD, V2, P198, DOI 10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9
   Sá JCD, 2017, ENVIRON INT, V98, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2016.10.020
   de Oliveira DC, 2022, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V22, DOI 10.1007/s10113-022-01945-9
   de Souza W, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V213, P968, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.245
   Doetterl S, 2015, NAT GEOSCI, V8, P780, DOI [10.1038/ngeo2516, 10.1038/NGEO2516]
   Dondini M., 2023, Global assessment of soil carbon in grasslands
   Dube F, 2011, ADV AGROFOR, V8, P101, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1630-8_6
   Mena-Mosquera VE, 2021, FLORESTA AMBIENTE, V28, DOI [10.1590/2179-8087-FLORAM-2020-0088, 10.1590/2179-8087-floram-2020-0088]
   Espinoza-Domínguez W, 2012, REV CHAPINGO SER CIE, V18, P57, DOI 10.5154/r.rchscfa.2011.04.030
   Maia SMF, 2022, SOIL TILL RES, V220, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2022.105368
   Frazo L. A., 2023, EGU23 COP M
   Gardi C., 2013, ATLAS SUELOS AM LATI
   Hansen C, 2022, MANAG REV Q, V72, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11301-021-00247-4
   Herrero M, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P20888, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1308149110
   Hong CP, 2021, NATURE, V589, P554, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-03138-y
   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2019, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.024
   IPCC, 2019, Technical summary, in: Climate change and land: IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems
   Jian JS, 2020, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V143, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107735
   Johnson JMF, 2007, ENVIRON POLLUT, V150, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.030
   Jordon MW, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V825, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153955
   Karakurt I, 2012, RENEW ENERG, V39, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2011.09.006
   Kaur N, 2023, GCB BIOENERGY, V15, P24, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.13003
   Kopittke PM, 2022, CRIT REV ENV SCI TEC, V52, P4308, DOI 10.1080/10643389.2021.2024484
   Kraamwinkel CT, 2021, COMMUN EARTH ENVIRON, V2, DOI 10.1038/s43247-021-00323-3
   Krauss M, 2017, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V239, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2017.01.029
   Lal R, 2005, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V220, P242, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.015
   Lal R, 2004, GEODERMA, V123, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032
   Lal R, 2003, CRIT REV PLANT SCI, V22, P151, DOI 10.1080/713610854
   Lal R., 2022, Carbon Footpr, V1, P3, DOI [10.20517/cf.2022.05, DOI 10.20517/CF.2022.05]
   Lal R, 2021, GEODERMA REG, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00398
   Lal R, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P3285, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14054
   Lal R, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P5875, DOI 10.3390/su7055875
   Landholm DM, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab3db6
   Lange M, 2015, NAT COMMUN, V6, DOI 10.1038/ncomms7707
   Le Quéré C, 2009, NAT GEOSCI, V2, P831, DOI 10.1038/ngeo689
   Lehman RM, 2017, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V81, P76, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2016.01.0021
   Li JQ, 2021, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V27, P4196, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15742
   Lin LF, 2018, BIOMETRICS, V74, P785, DOI 10.1111/biom.12817
   Liu C, 2013, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V10, P2427, DOI 10.5194/bg-10-2427-2013
   Löw P, 2020, ENVIRON RES COMMUN, V2, DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/abc098
   Manzatto C. V., 2020, Mitigao das emisses de Gases de Efeitos Estufa pela adoo das tecnologias do Plano ABC: estimativas parciais
   MAPA, 2020, Coletnea de fatores de emisso e remoo de gases de efeito estufa da pecuria brasileira
   Minasny B, 2017, GEODERMA, V292, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.002
   Mosquera O, 2012, GEODERMA, V189, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.04.022
   Chagas JKM, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V305, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114403
   Mukherjee A, 2013, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V3, P313, DOI 10.3390/agronomy3020313
   Nayak D, 2015, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V209, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2015.04.035
   Nicoloso RS, 2021, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V85, P1395, DOI 10.1002/saj2.20260
   Nwaogu C, 2024, ADV AGRON, V185, P1, DOI 10.1016/bs.agron.2024.02.003
   Oelbermann M, 2006, AGROFOREST SYST, V68, P27, DOI 10.1007/s10457-005-5963-7
   Olaya-Montes A, 2021, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V32, P3720, DOI 10.1002/ldr.3832
   Olson KR, 2015, CATENA, V125, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.004
   Owens PR, 2020, GEODERMA REG, V22, DOI 10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00285
   Paustian K, 2016, NATURE, V532, P49, DOI 10.1038/nature17174
   Peichl M, 2006, AGROFOREST SYST, V66, P243, DOI 10.1007/s10457-005-0361-8
   Pereira P, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SCI HL, V5, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.coesh.2017.12.003
   Picasso VD, 2014, MEAT SCI, V98, P346, DOI 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.07.005
   Pretty J., 2001, AGR INFLUENCES CARBO
   Roque BM, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V234, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.193
   Rothstein HR, 2005, PUBLICATION BIAS IN META-ANALYSIS: PREVENTION, ASSESSMENT AND ADJUSTMENTS, P1, DOI 10.1002/0470870168
   Salazar O, 2011, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V140, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2010.11.019
   Segnini A, 2011, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V66, P213, DOI 10.2489/jswc.66.4.213
   Sharrow SH, 2004, AGROFOREST SYST, V60, P123, DOI 10.1023/B:AGFO.0000013267.87896.41
   Silva-Parra A, 2021, GREENH GASES, V11, P554, DOI 10.1002/ghg.2066
   Smith P, 2008, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V81, P169, DOI 10.1007/s10705-007-9138-y
   Smith P, 2008, PHILOS T R SOC B, V363, P789, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2007.2184
   Smith P, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P219, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14815
   Smith P, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE, P811
   Snyder CS, 2009, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V133, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.021
   Sokol NW, 2019, NAT GEOSCI, V12, P46, DOI 10.1038/s41561-018-0258-6
   Stavi I, 2013, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V33, P275, DOI 10.1007/s13593-012-0110-0
   Steinbach HS, 2006, J ENVIRON QUAL, V35, P3, DOI 10.2134/jeq2005.0050
   Steinfeld JP, 2023, GEODERMA, V440, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116726
   Stewart CE, 2007, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V86, P19, DOI 10.1007/s10533-007-9140-0
   Tanabe K., 2006, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
   Thevathasan N. V., 1998, Nitrogen dynamics and other interactions in tree-cereal intercropping systems in southern Ontario
   UNCCD, 2019, Proportion of degraded land over the total land area
   Van Wesemael D, 2019, J DAIRY SCI, V102, P1780, DOI 10.3168/jds.2018-14534
   Venterea RT, 2016, J ENVIRON QUAL, V45, P1186, DOI 10.2134/jeq2016.01.0024
   Viglizzo EF, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V661, P531, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.130
   Williams H, 2020, GEODERMA, V360, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114010
   Wollenberg E, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P3859, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13340
   World Bank, 2023, Data from: Agriculture land (% of land area)
   Yang XL, 2024, NAT COMMUN, V15, DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-44464-9
NR 104
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2571-581X
J9 FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S
JI Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
PD NOV 19
PY 2024
VL 8
AR 1481005
DI 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1481005
PG 14
WC Food Science & Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Food Science & Technology
GA O1Q6J
UT WOS:001368960900001
OA Green Submitted, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Hürzeler, A
   Hollósi, B
   Burger, M
   Gubler, M
   Brönnimann, S
AF Huerzeler, Andre
   Hollosi, Brigitta
   Burger, Moritz
   Gubler, Moritz
   Broennimann, Stefan
TI Performance analysis of the urban climate model MUKLIMO_3 for three
   extreme heatwave events in Bern
SO CITY AND ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE Numerical modelling; Urban heat island; MUKLIMO_3; Urban temperature
   measurement; Heatwave; Climate adaptation
ID MORTALITY; CITY; ZONES; LOAD
AB Extreme heatwaves represent a health hazard that is expected to increase in the future, and which particularly affects urban populations worldwide due to intensification by urban heat islands. To analyze the impact of such extreme heatwaves on urban areas, urban climate models are a valuable tool. This study examines the perfor-mance of the urban climate model MUKLIMO_3 in modelling spatial air temperature patterns in the greater urban area of Bern, Switzerland, a city in complex topography, during three distinct extreme heatwaves in 2018 and 2019 over a total of 23 days. The model is validated using low-cost air temperature data from 79 (2018) and 84 (2019) measurement sites. The intercomparison of the three extreme heatwaves shows that during the first extreme heatwave 2019 at lower elevation regions in the outskirts of the city, modelled air temperature was higher than observation, which was likely due to pronounced mesoscale cold air advection. During calm and dry days, the air temperature distribution was modelled realistically over all three extreme heatwaves investigated. During daytime, modelled air temperatures were lower across all evaluation sites and all extreme heatwaves when compared to the measured values, with highest median air temperature differences of-3.7 K to-4.8 K found in the late afternoon. At night, MUKLIMO_3 generally shows a slowed cooling, so that higher air tem-peratures were modelled when compared to measured values, with median air temperature biases of +1.5 K to +2.8 K at midnight. By sunrise, the model biases continuously decreased, so that the lowest air temperatures at 7 a.m. were modelled with a bias of +0.2 K to +0.7 K. Peak biases exceed 7 K both during day and night. In sum, our results show that MUKLIMO_3 allows to realistically model the urban air temperature distributions during the peaks of the heatwaves investigated with the highest day and night air temperatures, which may assist in the development of heat mitigation measures to reduce the impacts of heat extremes and improve public health in cities with complex topography.
C1 [Huerzeler, Andre; Burger, Moritz; Gubler, Moritz; Broennimann, Stefan] Univ Bern, Oeschger Ctr Climate Change Res, Hsch Str 4, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.
   [Huerzeler, Andre; Burger, Moritz; Gubler, Moritz; Broennimann, Stefan] Univ Bern, Inst Geog, Hallerstr 12, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.
   [Hollosi, Brigitta] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Inst Geog & Reg Sci, Heinrichstr 36, A-8010 Graz, Austria.
   [Hollosi, Brigitta] Zentralanstalt Meteorol & Geodynam, Hohe Warte 38, A-1190 Vienna, Austria.
   [Gubler, Moritz] Inst Lower Secondary Educ, Fabrikstr 8, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.
C3 University of Bern; University of Bern; University of Graz
RP Brönnimann, S (corresponding author), Univ Bern, Inst Geog, Hallerstr 12, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.
RI Brönnimann, Stefan/A-5737-2008
OI Burger, Moritz/0000-0002-9085-8101; Bronnimann,
   Stefan/0000-0001-9502-7991
CR Amt fur Geoinformation des Kantons Bern, 2021, AMTL VERM VER
   Baccini M, 2008, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V19, P711, DOI 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318176bfcd
   BAFU, 2019, HITZ TROCK SOMM 2018, V91
   BFS & SSV, 2020, STAT SCHWEIZ STADT 2
   Bokwa A, 2019, ENERG BUILDINGS, V201, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.07.023
   Burger M, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100885
   Dobrovoln P., 2016, Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, V65, P169, DOI [10.15201/hungeobull.65.2.7, DOI 10.15201/HUNGEOBULL.65.2.7]
   DWD, 2020, US GUID MUKLIMO 3 TH
   Elzafarany A, 2017, GREATER CAIRO EG
   European Environment Agency, TREE COV DENS
   European Environment Agency, IMPERVIOUSNESS DEN
   Feranec J, 2019, Adv. Cartogr. GIScience ICA, V1, P1, DOI [10.5194/ica-adv-1-6-2019, DOI 10.5194/ICA-ADV-1-6-2019]
   Geletic J, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V624, P385, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.076
   Ginzler C, 2015, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V7, P4343, DOI 10.3390/rs70404343
   GODOWITCH JM, 1985, J CLIM APPL METEOROL, V24, P791, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1985)024<0791:EOTNIL>2.0.CO;2
   Grize L, 2005, SWISS MED WKLY, V135, P200
   Gross G., 1989, Contributions to Atmospheric Physics, V62, P57
   Gubler M, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100817
   Holec J, 2020, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V141, P979, DOI 10.1007/s00704-020-03197-1
   Hollósi B, 2021, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V144, P1181, DOI 10.1007/s00704-021-03580-6
   Horn R., 1981, BEDEUTUNG AGGREGIERU
   Kachelmannwetter, 2021, REG SCHNEER SCHWEIZ
   Kielar R, 2017, 1STMUKLIMO 3 USERS W
   Kopecka M, 2021, Agil. GIScience Ser., V2, P1, DOI [10.5194/agile-giss-2-5-2021, DOI 10.5194/AGILE-GISS-2-5-2021]
   Kottek M, 2006, METEOROL Z, V15, P259, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130
   Le Tertre A, 2006, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V17, P75, DOI 10.1097/01.ede.0000187650.36636.1f
   Mathys H, 1980, GEOGR BERNEN, pG12
   Matsaba E.O., 2020, CURR URBAN STUD, V8, P205, DOI [10.4236/cus.2020.82011, DOI 10.4236/CUS.2020.82011]
   MeteoSwiss, 2021, IDAWEB
   MeteoSwiss, 2020, CLIM NORM BERN ZOLL
   MeteoSwiss, 2019, HEAT WAVE
   MeteoSwiss, 2018, FACHBER METEOSCHWEIZ, V272, P38
   MeteoSwiss, 2020, KLIM 2019, V96
   Muthers S, 2017, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/atmos8110224
   Oke T. R., 2017, Urban Climates, DOI [10.1017/9781139016476, DOI 10.1017/9781139016476]
   OKE TR, 1973, ATMOS ENVIRON, V7, P769, DOI 10.1016/0004-6981(73)90140-6
   OKE TR, 1995, NATO ADV SCI INST SE, V277, P81
   Pachauri RK, 2014, 2014 IEEE STUDENTS' CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE (SCEECS)
   SIEBERT J, 1992, BOUND-LAY METEOROL, V59, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00120684
   Sievers U., 1983, Contributions to Atmospheric Physics, V56, P58
   Sievers U., 1986, Contributions to Atmospheric Physics, V59, P13
   Sievers U, 2012, KLEINSKALIGE STRO
   Sievers U, 2016, KLEINSKALIGE STRO
   Stewart ID, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P1879, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00019.1
   Straka M, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V183, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.11.006
   swisstopo, 2021, SWISSBUILDINGS3D 2 0
   swisstopo, 2018, SWISSALTI3D
   Taylor KE, 2001, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V106, P7183, DOI 10.1029/2000JD900719
   WANNER H, 1984, J CLIM APPL METEOROL, V23, P1614, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<1614:SOUCAA>2.0.CO;2
   Wmo, 2006, WORLD METEOROL ORG I, V81
   Zuvela-Aloise M, 2017, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V61, P527, DOI 10.1007/s00484-016-1230-z
NR 51
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 0
U2 7
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2590-2520
J9 CITY ENVIRON INTERAC
JI City Environ. Interact.
PD DEC
PY 2022
VL 16
AR 100090
DI 10.1016/j.cacint.2022.100090
EA OCT 2022
PG 18
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA 6S5HM
UT WOS:000893018000002
OA Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Rochell, K
   Bulkeley, H
   Runhaar, H
AF Rochell, Katharina
   Bulkeley, Harriet
   Runhaar, Hens
TI Nature for resilience reconfigured: global-to-local translation of
   frames in Africa
SO BUILDINGS & CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE cities; climate adaptation; environmental discourses; environmental
   justice; frames; resilience; transnational actors; urban nature; Africa
ID POLICY; MOBILITIES; KNOWLEDGE; JUSTICE; CITY
AB Globally, various frames of urban nature circulate, each emphasising particular challenges and natural solutions in the climate context. Yet which actors and dynamics shape their translation to the African context remains unclear. This paper explores the global -tolocal translation process of frames through interventions funded by transnational actors, conceptualised as agents of policy transfer. Critical scholarship has observed that urban adaptation and resilience interventions in Africa are often characterised as technocratic and top -down approaches, hence it is vital to understand whether these are replicated through proliferating nature -based solutions (NBSs). The study of a resilience -building intervention in Lilongwe, Malawi, reveals that transnational actors play important roles by deploying frames of urban nature through funding projects. However, rather than involving a top -down imposition of particular solutions, this sets in motion dynamics: in the competition for resources that frames generate, various actor constellations of transnational actors, subnational governments and local NGOs reconfigure or relabel strategies and associated (nature -based) practices to suit global frames and the resources they generate. This shapes who is included or not, and what kinds of NBS are being developed, for and by whom. There is a risk that priorities of communities get lost in translation. POLICY RELEVANCE Frames of urban nature shape global agendas but also matter locally in the design of programmes and projects. This study provides key insights of relevance for policymakers. First, external funding for climate and resilience is unpredictable and insufficient to address manifold urgent local priorities. It is important that actors at all levels strive to align resources to holistic strategies of local governments and do not impose certain visions for urban nature. For this to happen, and second, it is key that local governments and communities are empowered to create forms of nature that are built around diverse forms of local knowledge and expertise, to cater to values and priorities of the communities. Third, proponents of NBSs highlight their potential to address interlinked climate-, biodiversity- and society -related challenges. However, unless funding allocation puts emphasis on the interlinkage of goals, the potential for NBSs to reach multiple goals can get lost. Fourth, there is a need to disrupt the persisting scepticism concerning the feasibility of NBSs in informal settlements and forge collaborations that realise interventions closely linked to the priorities of disadvantaged groups in African cities, to leverage the power of nature for more just societies.
C1 [Rochell, Katharina; Bulkeley, Harriet; Runhaar, Hens] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Vening Meinesz Bldg,Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands.
   [Bulkeley, Harriet] Univ Durham, Dept Geog, Durham, England.
C3 Utrecht University; Durham University
RP Rochell, K (corresponding author), Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Vening Meinesz Bldg,Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands.
EM k.rochell@uu.nl
RI Bulkeley, Harriet/Y-3348-2019; Runhaar, Hens/L-5395-2013
OI Bulkeley, Harriet/0000-0001-9912-5687; Runhaar, Hens/0000-0001-7790-097X
CR Afionis S, 2020, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V8, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2020.558619
   Anguelovski I., 2018, City, V22, P417, DOI DOI 10.1080/13604813.2018.1473126
   Anguelovski I, 2023, AMBIO, V52, P45, DOI 10.1007/s13280-022-01771-7
   Bone RA, 2017, SOUTH FORESTS, V79, P269, DOI 10.2989/20702620.2016.1233777
   Bracking S., 2021, Negotiating Climate Change in Crisis, P255, DOI [DOI 10.11647/OBP.0265.20, 10.11647/OBP.0265.20]
   Broto VC, 2014, INT DEV PLANN REV, V36, P257, DOI 10.3828/idpr.2014.23
   Chausson A, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P6134, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15310
   Cocks M, 2021, ROU ST URBAN ECOLOGY, P104
   Croese S, 2023, LAND USE POLICY, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106832
   Diep L, 2022, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V4, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2022.927723
   Diep L, 2023, URBAN GEOGR, V44, P470, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2022.2087947
   Dolowitz D, 1996, POLIT STUD-LONDON, V44, P343, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x
   Dryzek J.S., 1997, POLITICS EARTH
   Englund H, 2002, J S AFR STUD, V28, P137, DOI 10.1080/03057070120117015
   Eriksen S, 2021, WORLD DEV, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105383
   Falzon D, 2021, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V51, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.03.016
   Goh K, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P2222, DOI 10.1177/0042098018807306
   Goodwin S, 2023, NAT SUSTAIN, V6, DOI 10.1038/s41893-022-01036-x
   Government of Malawi (GoM), 2019, Floods post disaster needs assessment report
   Harvey D., 1993, Socialist Register, V29
   Heynen N., 2005, In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism, P1, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203027523
   Laeni N, 2021, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V23, P16, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2020.1792858
   Lane M, 2022, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V112, P1350, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2021.1960791
   Li L, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13073876
   Lilongwe City Council, 2020, CityRAP for Lilongwe city-Malawi with focus on Mtandire informal settlement
   Mabon L, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V136, P652, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.07.025
   Makuwira J, 2022, URBAN FORUM, V33, P51, DOI 10.1007/s12132-022-09460-0
   Mannell J, 2014, HEALTH PLACE, V30, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.07.010
   McCann E, 2013, POLICY STUD-UK, V34, P2, DOI 10.1080/01442872.2012.748563
   McCann E, 2011, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V101, P107, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2010.520219
   Meijerink S, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Melanidis MS, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V132, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.02.028
   Mkulama A. K., 2020, Climate impacts on agricultural and natural resource sustainability in Africa, P115, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-37537-9_6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-37537-9_6]
   Mwathunga E, 2022, PLAN PERSPECT, V37, P713, DOI 10.1080/02665433.2021.1988867
   National Statistical Office, 2019, 2018 Malawi Population and Housing CensusMain report Internet
   Nazombe K, 2023, SCI AFR, V20, DOI 10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01639
   Nyika J., 2022, Nat. Based Solut, V2, DOI [10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100031, DOI 10.1016/J.NBSJ.2022.100031]
   Omukuti J, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104525
   Peck J, 2010, GEOFORUM, V41, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.002
   Pelling M, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V31, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.11.005
   Roberts D, 2020, ENVIRON URBAN, V32, P547, DOI 10.1177/0956247820946555
   Robinson J, 2015, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V39, P831, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12255
   Sekulova F, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103136
   Shi LD, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P131, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2841
   Spaliviero M, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101419
   Stone D, 2004, J EUR PUBLIC POLICY, V11, P545, DOI 10.1080/13501760410001694291
   Tozer L, 2022, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V22, P81, DOI 10.1162/glep_a_00658
   Tozer L, 2020, CITIES, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102892
   UN-Habitat, 2020, Discussion paper
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   van Hulst M, 2016, AM REV PUBLIC ADM, V46, P92, DOI 10.1177/0275074014533142
   Webber S, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V111, P343, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1774349
   Williams Raymond., 2005, NATURE, P47
   Ziervogel G, 2019, AMBIO, V48, P494, DOI 10.1007/s13280-018-1141-9
   Zimba J.M., 2022, The Sustainable City, V16, P135, DOI [10.2495/SC220121, DOI 10.2495/SC220121]
   Zulu LC, 2010, ENERG POLICY, V38, P3717, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.050
NR 56
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 0
U2 2
PU UBIQUITY PRESS LTD
PI LONDON
PA Unit 3N, 6 Osborn Street, LONDON, E1 6TD, ENGLAND
SN 2632-6655
J9 BUILD CITIES
JI Build. Cities
PY 2024
VL 5
IS 1
BP 1
EP 15
DI 10.5334/bc.379
PG 15
WC Construction & Building Technology
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Construction & Building Technology
GA OO0F9
UT WOS:001208091000006
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Abbott, J
   Anderson, JL
   Campling, L
   Hannesson, R
   Havice, E
   Lozier, MS
   Smith, MD
   Wilberg, MJ
AF Abbott, Joshua
   Anderson, James L.
   Campling, Liam
   Hannesson, Rognvaldur
   Havice, Elizabeth
   Lozier, M. Susan
   Smith, Martin D.
   Wilberg, Michael J.
TI Steering the Global Partnership for Oceans
SO MARINE RESOURCE ECONOMICS
LA English
DT Article
DE Oceans governance; environment and development; ocean health
AB The Global Partnership for Oceans (GPO) is an alliance of governments, private firms, international organizations, and civil society groups that aims to promote ocean health while contributing to human wellbeing. A Blue Ribbon Panel (BRP) was commissioned to develop guiding principles for GPO investments. Here we offer commentary on the BRP report from scholars in multiple disciplines that study the oceans: environmental economics, environmental politics, fisheries science, physical oceanography, and political economy. The BRP is a prominent, unique group of individuals representing diverse interests of GPO partners. We applaud the call for knowledge creation, but identify diverse issues that the BRP omitted: the need for effective governance to address data-poor stocks so that gaps do not dictate solutions; the deployment of projects that facilitate learning about governance effectiveness through program evaluation; and the importance of large-scale coordination of data collection in furthering the BRP's call for capacity building. Commenters' opinions are mixed on the likely impact of the report's recommendations on ocean health, governance, and economic development, but they highlight several key features of the report. A centerpiece of the report that distinguishes it from most previous high-level reports on the oceans is the prominence given to human well-being. The report emphasizes the commons problem as a critical institutional failure that must be addressed and focuses heavily on market-based mechanisms to improve governance. The report successfully acknowledges tradeoffs-across different stakeholders as well as across human well-being and ocean health but there is little specific guidance on how to make these tradeoffs. Historical tensions among GPO partners run deep, and resolving them will require more than high-level principles. For instance, it is unclear how to resolve the potential conflict between proprietary data and the report's stated desire for transparency and open access to information. Some differences may ultimately be irreconcilable. The report appropriately advocates flexibility for the GPO to adapt solutions to particulars of a problem, avoiding the trap of one size fits all. However, flexibility is also a weakness because the BRP does not provide guidance on how best to approach problems that span multiple scales. Some scales may be beyond the scope of the GPO; for example, the GPO cannot meaningfully contribute to global climate change mitigation. Nevertheless, the GPO could play an important role in climate adaptation by facilitating the development of governance regimes that are resilient to climate-induced species migrations.
C1 [Abbott, Joshua] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
   [Anderson, James L.] World Bank, Oceans Fisheries & Aquaculture Serv, Washington, DC 20433 USA.
   [Anderson, James L.] World Bank, Agr Serv, Washington, DC 20433 USA.
   [Anderson, James L.] World Bank, Environm Serv, Washington, DC 20433 USA.
   [Campling, Liam] Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Business & Management, London, England.
   [Hannesson, Rognvaldur] Norwegian Sch Econ, London, England.
   [Havice, Elizabeth] Univ N Carolina, Dept Geog, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.
   [Lozier, M. Susan; Smith, Martin D.] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC 27708 USA.
   [Wilberg, Michael J.] Univ Maryland, Ctr Environm Sci, Chesapeake Biol Lab, Solomons, MD 20688 USA.
C3 Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe; The World
   Bank; The World Bank; The World Bank; University of London; Queen Mary
   University London; Norwegian School of Economics (NHH); University of
   North Carolina; University of North Carolina Chapel Hill; Duke
   University; University System of Maryland; University of Maryland Center
   for Environmental Science
RP Abbott, J (corresponding author), Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, POB 875502, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
EM joshua.k.abbott@asu.edu; janderson8@worldbank.org;
   l.campling@qmul.ac.uk; Rognvaldur.Hannesson@nhh.no;
   havice@email.unc.edu; mslozier@duke.edu; marsmith@duke.edu;
   wilberg@umces.edu
RI ; Wilberg, Michael/D-6289-2013; Smith, Martin/D-9168-2016
OI Anderson, James L./0000-0003-2942-8345; Wilberg,
   Michael/0000-0001-8982-5946; Smith, Martin/0000-0002-4714-463X; Havice,
   Elizabeth/0000-0003-0760-2082
CR Anderson J., 2011, Global Program for Fisheries: Strategic Vision for Fisheries and Aquaculture
   [Anonymous], 2009, The Sunken Billions: The Economic Justification for Fisheries Reform
   Arestis P., 2008, CRITICAL ESSAYS PRIV
   Banerjee A. V., 2006, EVALUATION WORLD BAN
   Blue Ribbon Panel, 2013, IND OC AL OC HLTH HU
   Bush SR, 2013, SCIENCE, V341, P1067, DOI 10.1126/science.1237314
   Campling L, 2014, J PEASANT STUD, V41, P707, DOI 10.1080/03066150.2014.894909
   Clapp J, 2012, REV INT POLIT ECON, V19, P181, DOI 10.1080/09692290.2010.514528
   Doulman D., 1999, WORKSH EC STRENGTH F, P27
   FAO/ILO, 2013, GUID ADDR CHILD LAB
   Ghosh J, 2010, J AGRAR CHANGE, V10, P72, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00249.x
   GIGLIOTTI L M, 1990, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, V10, P106, DOI 10.1577/1548-8675(1990)010<0106:TEOIHO>2.3.CO;2
   Global Partnership for Oceans Working Group, 2012, DECL HEALTHY PROD OC
   Gunderson D. R., 1984, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V4, P465
   Havice E, 2013, ENVIRON PLANN A, V45, P2610, DOI 10.1068/a45697
   ILO, 2013, EMPL PRACT WORK COND
   Melber H., 2003, Review of African Political Economy, V30, P142
   Milberg W., 2013, OUTSOURCING EC GLOBA
   Nye JA, 2009, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V393, P111, DOI 10.3354/meps08220
   Pikitch Ellen., 2012, Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs
   Tuck GN, 2000, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V192, P89, DOI 10.3354/meps192089
   Wiedenmann J, 2013, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V33, P845, DOI 10.1080/02755947.2013.811128
   World Bank, 2009, GLOBAL ECONOMIC PROSPECTS: COMMODITIES AT THE CROSSROADS, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-7799-4
   Zoellick R., 2012, EC WORLD OCEAN SUMMI
NR 24
TC 13
Z9 15
U1 1
U2 40
PU UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
PI CHICAGO
PA 1427 E 60TH ST, CHICAGO, IL 60637-2954 USA
SN 0738-1360
EI 2334-5985
J9 MAR RESOUR ECON
JI Mar. Resour. Econ.
PY 2014
VL 29
IS 1
BP 1
EP 16
DI 10.1086/676290
PG 16
WC Economics; Environmental Studies; Fisheries
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Fisheries
GA AH5TT
UT WOS:000336194700001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wu, DX
   Rahim, M
   El Ganaoui, M
   Bennacer, R
   Liu, B
AF Wu, Dongxia
   Rahim, Mourad
   El Ganaoui, Mohammed
   Bennacer, Rachid
   Liu, Bin
TI Multilayer assembly of phase change material and bio-based concrete: A
   passive envelope to improve the energy and hygrothermal performance of
   buildings
SO ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Phase change material (PCM); Bio-based concrete; Passive building
   envelope; Heat and moisture transfer; Hygrothermal performance; Energy
   savings
ID HUMIDITY CONTROL MATERIAL; HEAT-TRANSFER REDUCTION;
   TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENCE; SORPTION ISOTHERM; WALLS; PCM; LAYER;
   OPTIMIZATION; INSULATION; DERIVATION
AB Phase change materials (PCMs) can improve indoor thermal comfort and reduce energy consumption, while biobased concrete is an environment-friendly material that enables indoor humidity regulation and heat insulation. However, only a few studies have explored the integrated application of the two materials and comprehensively analyzed the energy and hygrothermal performance. In this study, a passive envelope solution that integrates PCM and hemp concrete is proposed to improve buildings' energy, thermal, and hygric performances simultaneously. Four integrated scenarios were considered and compared with a baseline scenario (hemp concrete only). The performance of the integrated envelope was studied numerically based on the impact of the PCM' s properties and its location in the envelope. The results highlight the indispensable role moisture transfer plays in determining the indoor hygric environment and heat load, as well as the valuable effect of the integrated envelope on improving both energy and hygrothermal performance. Scenario 4/5 (with PCM closest to the interior) in the summer showed the greatest performance improvement compared to the baseline scenario, with reductions of 8.2%, 46.3%, and 43.7% for heat load, temperature fluctuation, and partial water vapor pressure fluctuation, respectively. The impact of the PCM properties in scenario 4/5 illustrate that the optimization of the integrated envelope can be achieved by increasing the thickness and latent heat of the PCM and identifying its appropriate phase transition range. From a year-round perspective, scenario 4/5 is also notable, as it shows great potential for saving energy and adapting to climate humidity variation while guaranteeing moisture equilibrium within the hemp concrete. The three-year assessment confirmed a lack of condensation and no risk of mold growth for such an integrated envelope, as the relative humidity in key locations remains below 75%.
C1 [Wu, Dongxia; Rahim, Mourad; El Ganaoui, Mohammed] Univ Lorraine, LERMAB, IUT H Poincare Longwy, 168 Rue Lorraine, F-54400 Cosnes Et Romain, Longwy, France.
   [Bennacer, Rachid] Univ Paris Saclay, LMT, CNRS, ENS Paris Saclay, F-91190 Gif Sur Yvette, France.
   [Liu, Bin] Tianjin Univ Commerce, Tianjin Key Lab Refrigerat Technol, Tianjin 300134, Peoples R China.
C3 Universite de Lorraine; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
   (CNRS); Universite Paris Saclay; Tianjin University of Commerce
RP Wu, DX; El Ganaoui, M (corresponding author), IUT Henri Poincare Longwy, 168 Rue Lorraine, F-54400 Cosnes Et Romain, Longwy, France.
EM dongxia.wu@univ-lorraine.fr; mohammed.el-ganaoui@univ-lorraine.fr
RI RAHIM, Mourad/L-9633-2018; Wu, Dongxia/AFF-6886-2022; BENNACER,
   RACHID/GVU-3986-2022
OI Wu, Dongxia/0000-0003-2458-5923
FU China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201808120084]
FX We thank to the China Scholarship Council (CSC) for its financial
   support to the first author, No. 201808120084. CPER UL/Lorraine Region,
   PHC Maghreb, and EMPP Scientific Pole of the University of Lorraine are
   also acknowledged. I would also like to thank my wife, CF WANG, for her
   support of my research and care in my life.
CR [Anonymous], 2012, 13788 EI
   [Anonymous], 2009, BUILD
   Benmahiddine F, 2020, J BUILD ENG, V32, DOI [10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101758, 10.1016/j.jobc.2020.101758]
   Biswas K, 2014, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V88, P1020, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.09.003
   Chang SJ, 2017, APPL THERM ENG, V114, P457, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.11.188
   Chen Z, 2016, APPL THERM ENG, V98, P1150, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.12.096
   Chennouf N, 2019, ENERG BUILDINGS, V202, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109413
   Chennouf N, 2018, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V192, P348, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.089
   Colinart T, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V152, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.07.016
   Colinart T, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V139, P360, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.082
   Dehmous M, 2021, ENERG BUILDINGS, V241, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110878
   Dlimi M, 2019, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V20, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2019.07.008
   Energain® D., 2010, Hydrocarbon-based PCM applications
   Fateh A, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V153, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.007
   Fick A., 1855, Annalen der Physik, V170, P59, DOI [DOI 10.1002/ANDP.18551700105, 10.1002/andp.18551700105]
   Florentin Y, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V156, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.097
   Fraine Y, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V154, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.036
   G.A. f.B.a. Construction, 2020 GLOB STAT REP B
   Galvin KP, 2005, CHEM ENG SCI, V60, P4659, DOI 10.1016/j.ces.2005.03.030
   He XQ, 2021, ENERG BUILDINGS, V236, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110792
   Hou PM, 2020, J BUILD ENG, V31, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101345
   Hukka A, 1999, WOOD SCI TECHNOL, V33, P475, DOI 10.1007/s002260050131
   Kabdrakhmanova M, 2021, ENERGY, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121651
   Kishore RA, 2021, APPL THERM ENG, V187, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.116568
   Kishore RA, 2020, ENERG BUILDINGS, V226, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110355
   Kottek M., 2006, Meteor. Z., V15, P259, DOI [10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0110]
   Kunzel HartwigM., 1995, One-And Two-Dimensional Calculation Using Simple Parameters, P65
   Larwa B, 2021, ENERGY, V225, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120245
   Lee KO, 2015, APPL ENERG, V137, P699, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.003
   Li D, 2018, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V172, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.07.015
   Li LP, 2008, ENERG BUILDINGS, V40, P1790, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.03.010
   Li ZX, 2019, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V195, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.04.075
   Mendes N, 2002, INT J HEAT MASS TRAN, V45, P509, DOI 10.1016/S0017-9310(01)00172-7
   Mousavi S, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V151, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111601
   Neeper DA, 2000, SOL ENERGY, V68, P393, DOI 10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00012-8
   OCALLAGHAN PW, 1977, APPL ENERG, V3, P307, DOI 10.1016/0306-2619(77)90017-4
   Oliver A, 2012, ENERG BUILDINGS, V48, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.01.026
   Park JH, 2019, ENERG BUILDINGS, V183, P803, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.023
   Peuhkuri Ruut., 2003, Moisture dynamics in building envelopes - PhD Thesis
   Piselli C, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V162, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.043
   Poyet S, 2009, CEMENT CONCRETE RES, V39, P1060, DOI 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.07.018
   Rahim M, 2016, J BUILD ENG, V7, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2016.07.003
   Rahim M, 2015, ENERG BUILDINGS, V88, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.11.043
   Rathore PKS, 2019, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V225, P723, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.221
   Rode C., 2006, MOISTURE BUFFERING B
   Shi X, 2014, ENERG BUILDINGS, V71, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.12.001
   SWINBANK WC, 1963, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V89, P339, DOI 10.1002/qj.49708938105
   Walton G N., 1983, Thermal Analysis Research Program Reference Manual, P21
   Wang YY, 2021, J BUILD ENG, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102949
   WHITAKER S, 1986, TRANSPORT POROUS MED, V1, P3, DOI 10.1007/BF01036523
   Wieprzkowicz Anna, 2020, Renewable Energy, V160, P653, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.146
   Wijesuriya S, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106750
   Wu DX, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V201, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107995
   Wu ZM, 2018, ENERG BUILDINGS, V174, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.036
   Wu ZM, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V205, P1011, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.162
   Yang L, 2020, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112876
   Yu JH, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V145, P2538, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.026
   Zhou S, 2002, CLIMATOLOGY METEOROL
NR 58
TC 28
Z9 29
U1 7
U2 28
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0196-8904
EI 1879-2227
J9 ENERG CONVERS MANAGE
JI Energy Conv. Manag.
PD APR 1
PY 2022
VL 257
AR 115454
DI 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115454
EA MAR 2022
PG 20
WC Thermodynamics; Energy & Fuels; Mechanics
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Thermodynamics; Energy & Fuels; Mechanics
GA 2P7NI
UT WOS:000819922400006
OA Bronze, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Moncel, MH
   Ashton, N
   Arzarello, M
   Fontana, F
   Lamotte, A
   Scott, B
   Muttillo, B
   Berruti, G
   Nenzioni, G
   Tuffreau, A
   Peretto, C
AF Moncel, Marie-Helene
   Ashton, Nick
   Arzarello, Marta
   Fontana, Federica
   Lamotte, Agnes
   Scott, Beccy
   Muttillo, Brunella
   Berruti, Gabriele
   Nenzioni, Gabriele
   Tuffreau, Alain
   Peretto, Carlo
TI Early Levallois core technology between Marine Isotope Stage 12 and 9 in
   Western Europe
SO JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Neanderthals; Early Levallois; Western Europe; Technology
ID MIDDLE PALEOLITHIC SITE; GUADO SAN NICOLA; ORGNAC 3; KAPTHURIN
   FORMATION; POPULATION-SIZE; NORTHERN FRANCE; DNA-SEQUENCES; JEBEL
   IRHOUD; SERIES DATES; STONE TOOLS
AB Early Levallois core technology is usually dated in Europe to the end of Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 9 and particularly from the beginning of MIS 8 to MIS 6. This technology is considered as one of the markers of the transition from lower to Middle Paleolithic or from Mode 2 to Mode 3. Recent discoveries show that some lithic innovations actually appeared earlier in western Europe, from MIS 12 to MIS 9, contemporaneous with changes in subsistence strategies and the first appearance of early Neanderthal anatomical features. Among these discoveries, there is the iconic Levallois core technology. A selection of well-dated assemblages in the United Kingdom, France, and Italy dated from MIS 12 to 9, which include both cores and flakes with Levallois features, has been described and compared with the aim of characterizing this technology. The conclusion supports the interpretation that several technical features may be attributed to a Levallois technology similar to those observed in younger Middle Paleolithic sites, distinct from the main associated core technologies in each level. Some features in the sample of sites suggest a gradual transformation of existing core technologies. The small evidence of Levallois could indicate occasional local innovations from different technological backgrounds and would explain the diversity of Levallois methods that is observed from MIS 12. The technological roots of Levallois technology in the Middle Pleistocene would suggest a multiregional origin and diffusion in Europe and early evidence of regionalization of local traditions through Europe from MIS 12 to 9. The relationships of Levallois technology with new needs and behaviors are discussed, such as flake preference, functional reasons related to hunting and hafting, an increase in the use of mental templates in European populations, and changes in the structure of hominin groups adapting to climatic and environmental changes. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Moncel, Marie-Helene] Inst Paleontol Humaine, UMR 7194 CNRS, Museum Natl Hist Nat, Dept Hommes & Environm, Paris, France.
   [Ashton, Nick] British Museum, Dept Britain Europe & Prehist, Franks House,56 Orsman Rd, London N1 5QJ, England.
   [Arzarello, Marta; Fontana, Federica; Scott, Beccy; Muttillo, Brunella; Berruti, Gabriele; Peretto, Carlo] Univ Ferrara, Dipartimento Studi Umanist, Sez Sci Preistor & Antropolog, Corso Ercole Este 32, I-44121 Ferrara, Italy.
   [Lamotte, Agnes; Tuffreau, Alain] Univ Lille, UMR 8164, Batiment Geog,Ave Paul Langevin, Villeneuve Dascq, France.
   [Berruti, Gabriele] Museo Archeol & Paleontol C Conti, Borgosesia, Italy.
   [Nenzioni, Gabriele] Museo Preistoria L Donini, Via Fratelli Canova, Bologna, Italy.
C3 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); CNRS - Institute of
   Ecology & Environment (INEE); Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle
   (MNHN); University of Ferrara; Centre National de la Recherche
   Scientifique (CNRS); CNRS - Institute for Humanities & Social Sciences
   (INSHS); Universite de Lille
RP Moncel, MH (corresponding author), Inst Paleontol Humaine, UMR 7194 CNRS, Museum Natl Hist Nat, Dept Hommes & Environm, Paris, France.
EM marie-helene.moncel@mnhn.fr
RI Muttillo, Brunella/AAB-1641-2020; Ashton, Nicholas/JOZ-1498-2023;
   Arzarello, Marta/F-1464-2015
OI Arzarello, Marta/0000-0003-3379-1112; Fontana,
   Federica/0000-0002-8710-4421; Muttillo, Brunella/0000-0001-8039-5767;
   Ashton, Nicholas/0000-0002-3579-8804
CR Adler DS, 2014, SCIENCE, V345, P1609, DOI 10.1126/science.1256484
   Akhilesh K, 2018, NATURE, V554, P97, DOI 10.1038/nature25444
   Alperson-Afil N, 2016, QUATERN INT, V411, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.068
   [Anonymous], 1995, DEFINITION INTERPRET
   [Anonymous], QUATERNAIRE
   [Anonymous], 1992, HIGH LODGE EXCAVATIO
   [Anonymous], 1978, PALEOECOLOGY ARCHAEO
   [Anonymous], 1924, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0958841800025011
   Antoine P., 2003, Bulletin de la Societe prehistorique francaise, V100, P5, DOI [10.3406/bspf.2003. 12790, 10.3406/bspf.2003.12790]
   Antoine P, 2007, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V26, P2701, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.01.036
   Antoine P, 2016, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V149, P338, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.07.035
   Aouraghe H, 1999, ANTHROPOLOGIE, V103, P177
   Arsuaga JL, 2014, SCIENCE, V344, P1358, DOI 10.1126/science.1253958
   Ashton N., 2017, CROSSING HUMAN THRES, P142
   Ashton N., 2017, CROSSING HUMAN THRES, P164
   Ashton N, 2018, J QUATERNARY SCI, V33, P194, DOI 10.1002/jqs.3015
   Baena J, 2017, QUATERN INT, V436, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.08.031
   BAENA JB, 2018, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V190, P123, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.04.015
   Bar-Yosef O, 2011, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V30, P1318, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.02.016
   Ben-Dor M, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0028689
   Berruti G.L., 2017, THESIS
   Bischoff JL, 2007, J ARCHAEOL SCI, V34, P763, DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2006.08.003
   Bisi F., 1982, ATT 23 RIUN SCI I I, P259
   Blain HA, 2015, J QUATERNARY SCI, V30, P667, DOI 10.1002/jqs.2799
   Blasco R, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0055863
   Blasco R, 2012, QUATERN INT, V252, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2011.03.019
   Bocquet-Appel JP, 2013, CURR ANTHROPOL, V54, pS202, DOI 10.1086/673725
   Boeda E., 1995, DEFINITION INTERPRET, P41
   Boeda E., 1993, Bulletin de La Societe Prehistorique Francaise, V90, P392
   Boeda E., 1990, PALEO, V2, P43
   Boeda E., 1986, THESIS
   Böhner U, 2015, J HUM EVOL, V89, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.10.001
   Bolton L, 2015, THESIS
   Bordes F, 1950, ANTHROPOLOGIE, V54, P19
   Boucher de Perthes J., 1857, ANTIQUITES CELTIQUES, V2
   Bourguignon L., 2008, Memoire XLVII de la Societe Prehistorique Francaise, P41
   Brenet M., 2006, SOC PALEOLITHIQUES G, V47, P57
   Breuil LH, 1954, BULL SOC PREHIST FR, V51, P9
   Bridgland D.R., 1994, QUATERNARY THAMES
   Burchell J.P.T., 1931, P PREHISTORIC SOC E, V6, P253
   Carmignani L, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0178550
   Chazan M, 2015, AFR ARCHAEOL REV, V32, P701, DOI 10.1007/s10437-015-9205-8
   Clark Grahame., 1969, World Prehistory: A New Outline
   Collard M, 2013, CURR ANTHROPOL, V54, pS388, DOI 10.1086/673881
   Combier J., 1967, PALEOLITHIQUE ARDECH
   Commont V., 1909, M MOIRES SOCI T G OL, V6, P1
   Conard NJ, 2015, J HUM EVOL, V89, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.10.003
   de la Torre I, 2003, J HUM EVOL, V44, P203, DOI 10.1016/S0047-2484(02)00206-3
   DE MORTILLET G., 1883, Le Prehistorique, Antiquite de l'homme
   DEBARD E, 1988, CR ACAD SCI II, V306, P1515
   DeBono Hila., 2001, Journal of the Israel Prehistoric Society, V31, P9
   Deino AL, 2018, SCIENCE, V360, P95, DOI 10.1126/science.aao2216
   Dennell RW, 2011, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V30, P1511, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.11.027
   Derex M, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P2982, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1518798113
   Di Modica K, 2016, QUATERN INT, V411, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.072
   Di Modica K, 2016, QUATERN INT, V411, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.084
   Dibble H.L., 1995, DEFINITION INTERPRET
   Douze K, 2016, J HUM EVOL, V91, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.11.006
   EL HAZZAZI N., 1998, THESIS
   Endicott P, 2010, J HUM EVOL, V59, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.04.005
   Eren MI, 2016, J ARCHAEOL METHOD TH, V23, P379, DOI 10.1007/s10816-015-9245-z
   Fabre V, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0005151
   FALGUERES C, 1988, ANTHROPOLOGIE, V92, P727
   Farabegoli E., 2000, ACT C INT SCI TECHN, VII, P1179
   Farabegoli F., 1996, LETT PIETRA DEPOSITI, pXXXIX
   Fernandez Peris J., 2008, TREBALLS ARQUEOLOGIA, V14, P141
   Fogarty L, 2017, PHILOS T R SOC B, V372, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2016.0428
   Foley R, 1997, CAMB ARCHAEOL J, V7, P3, DOI 10.1017/S0959774300001451
   Fontana F, 2013, J ANTHROPOL ARCHAEOL, V32, P478, DOI 10.1016/j.jaa.2013.08.003
   Fontana F, 2010, QUATERN INT, V223, P465, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.02.013
   García-Medrano P, 2015, QUATERN INT, V368, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.03.006
   Gauthier A., 1992, THESIS
   Geyh MA, 2005, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V24, P1861, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.01.007
   Golovanova LV, 2017, QUATERN INT, V428, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.11.062
   Gowlett JAJ, 2016, PHILOS T R SOC B, V371, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2015.0164
   Green RE, 2010, SCIENCE, V328, P710, DOI 10.1126/science.1188021
   Grove M, 2018, J ARCHAEOL SCI-REP, V19, P588, DOI 10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.04.003
   Grove M, 2016, J ARCHAEOL SCI, V74, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2016.09.002
   Guerin C., 1980, DOCUMENTS LAB GEOLOG
   Guthrie RD, 2001, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V20, P549
   Hardy BL, 2013, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V82, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.09.028
   Hérisson D, 2016, QUATERN INT, V411, P233, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.02.049
   Hérisson D, 2016, QUATERN INT, V409, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.01.055
   Hershkovitz I, 2018, SCIENCE, V359, P456, DOI 10.1126/science.aap8369
   Hublin JJ, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P16022, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0904119106
   Hublin JJ, 2017, NATURE, V546, P289, DOI 10.1038/nature22336
   Hublin JJ, 2006, CURR BIOL, V16, pR113, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2006.02.009
   Hublin JJ, 1998, NEANDERTALS AND MODERN HUMANS IN WESTERN ASIA, P295
   JEANNET M, 1981, Bulletin Mensuel de la Societe Linneenne de Lyon, V50, P49
   Johnson CR, 2010, J HUM EVOL, V58, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.10.001
   Jouzel J, 2007, SCIENCE, V317, P793, DOI 10.1126/science.1141038
   Khatib S., 1994, Quaternaire, V5, P13, DOI [10.3406/quate.1994.2010, DOI 10.3406/QUATE.1994.2010]
   Knecht H, 1997, INTERD CONT, P191
   Koulakovska L, 2010, QUATERN INT, V223, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2009.09.031
   Kozlowski JK, 2014, QUATERN INT, V326, P344, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.08.020
   Kozowyk PRB, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-08106-7
   Krings M, 1997, CELL, V90, P19, DOI 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80310-4
   Kyriacou Andreas, 2011, Paleoanthropology, V2011, P130
   Lamotte A., 2012, THESIS
   Lamotte A., 2001, PUBLICATIONS CERP, V6, P59
   Lamotte A., 1994, THESIS
   Lamotte A, 2016, QUATERN INT, V409, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.08.058
   Leader GM, 2018, QUATERN INT, V480, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.08.046
   Lenzi F., 1996, LETT PIETRA
   Limondin-Lozouet N, 2015, J QUATERNARY SCI, V30, P702, DOI 10.1002/jqs.2798
   lovita R., 2016, MULTIDISCIPLINARY AP
   Lumley de MA., 1981, PREMIERS HABITANTS E, P143
   Lycett SJ, 2016, LITHIC TECHNOL, V41, P19, DOI 10.1179/2051618515Y.0000000012
   Lycett SJ, 2013, J ARCHAEOL SCI, V40, P2384, DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2013.01.016
   Malinsky-Buller A, 2016, QUATERN INT, V409, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.09.079
   Malinsky-Buller A, 2016, J WORLD PREHIST, V29, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10963-016-9092-1
   Manzi G, 2010, J HUM EVOL, V59, P580, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.06.010
   de Castro JMB, 2019, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V217, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.04.003
   Masaoudi H., 1995, THESIS
   Mazza PPA, 2006, J ARCHAEOL SCI, V33, P1310, DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2006.01.006
   McNabb J., 2001, The shape of things to come: A speculative essay on the role of the Victoria West phenomenon at Canteen Koppie, during the South African Earlier Stone Age, A Very Remote Period Indeed: Papers on the Palaeolithic presented to Derek Roe, P37
   Meijer T, 2009, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V68, P326, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2009.03.004
   Mellars P., 1996, SYMBOLISM LANGUAGE N, P15
   Meyer M, 2016, NATURE, V531, P504, DOI 10.1038/nature17405
   Meyer M, 2014, NATURE, V505, P403, DOI 10.1038/nature12788
   Michel V, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0082394
   Moigne AM., 1999, ROLE EARLY HUMANS AC, P219
   Moigne AM, 2016, QUATERN INT, V409, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.06.059
   Moncel M-H., 2003, BR ARCHAEOL REPORTS, P1184
   Moncel MH, 2016, QUATERN INT, V409, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.06.006
   Moncel MH, 2015, J ANTHROPOL ARCHAEOL, V40, P302, DOI 10.1016/j.jaa.2015.09.005
   Moncel MH, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0075529
   Moncel MH, 2012, J HUM EVOL, V63, P653, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.08.001
   Moncel MH, 2011, CURR ANTHROPOL, V52, P37, DOI 10.1086/658179
   Monnier GF, 2006, CURR ANTHROPOL, V47, P709, DOI 10.1086/506280
   Mourer-Chauvire C., 1975, FALGUERES DOCUMENTS
   Mourre V, 2006, Normes techniques et pratiques sociale: de la simplicite des outillages pre-et protohistoriques, P61
   Muttillo B., 2014, ANN U STUDI FERRA FE
   Nitychoruk J, 2006, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V25, P2678, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.07.004
   Nowell A, 2010, STONE TOOLS AND THE EVOLUTION OF HUMAN COGNITION, P67
   Ollé A, 2016, QUATERN INT, V411, P316, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.01.042
   Orlando L, 2006, CURR BIOL, V16, pR400, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.019
   Palma di Cesnola A., 1967, MEMORIE MUSEO CIVICO, V15, P1
   Palombo MR, 2016, QUATERN INT, V413, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.07.069
   Pereira A, 2018, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V187, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.03.021
   Pereira A, 2016, QUAT GEOCHRONOL, V36, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2016.08.005
   Peretto C, 2016, QUATERN INT, V411, P301, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.11.056
   Picin A, 2018, J QUATERNARY SCI, V33, P300, DOI 10.1002/jqs.2978
   Picin A, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0076182
   Potts R, 2018, SCIENCE, V360, P86, DOI 10.1126/science.aao2200
   Premo LS, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P33, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0809194105
   RENFREW C., 1978, SOCIAL ORG SETTLEMEN, V47, P89
   Revillion S., 1995, B SOC PREHISTORIQUE, V92, P425, DOI [DOI 10.3406/BSPF.1995.10058, 10.3406/bspf.1995.10058]
   Richter D, 2017, NATURE, V546, P293, DOI 10.1038/nature22335
   Rigaud J.P., 1988, MEMOIRES SOC PREHIST
   Rightmire GP, 2008, EVOL ANTHROPOL, V17, P8, DOI 10.1002/evan.20160
   Rightmire GP, 2017, VERTEBR PALEOBIOL PA, P145, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46646-0_11
   Ríos L, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-38571-1
   Rodríguez-Hidalgo A, 2017, J HUM EVOL, V105, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.01.007
   Roe D.A., 1981, The Lower and Middle Palaeolithic periods in Britain
   Roe HM, 2009, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V28, P2342, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.04.017
   Roebroeks W., 1988, ANALECTA PRAEHIST LE, V21, P196
   Roebroeks W, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P6372, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1521269113
   Roebroeks W, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P5209, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1018116108
   Rogers AR, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P9859, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1706426114
   Rohling EJ, 2010, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V291, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.12.054
   Rossoni-Notter E, 2016, QUATERN INT, V409, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.11.016
   Rots V, 2013, J ARCHAEOL SCI, V40, P497, DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.042
   Rots V, 2011, J HUM EVOL, V60, P637, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.01.001
   Sam Y., 2011, PREDATEURES TOUS EUR, P351
   Sam Y., 2009, THESIS
   Sánchez-Romero L, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0167595
   Santonja M, 2018, QUATERN INT, V480, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.01.021
   Schreve DC, 2001, QUATERN INT, V79, P65, DOI 10.1016/S1040-6182(00)00123-3
   Scott B., 2011, Becoming Neanderthals: The earlier British Middle Palaeolithic
   Scott B, 2010, J QUATERNARY SCI, V25, P931, DOI 10.1002/jqs.1373
   Sharon G, 2009, CURR ANTHROPOL, V50, P335, DOI 10.1086/598849
   Shimelmitz R, 2018, QUATERN INT, V464, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.08.011
   Soriano S, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0186082
   Stiner MC, 2002, J ARCHAEOL RES, V10, P1, DOI 10.1023/A:1014588307174
   Stringer C, 2012, EVOL ANTHROPOL, V21, P101, DOI 10.1002/evan.21311
   TEXIER PJ, 1995, CR ACAD SCI II, V320, P647
   Thieme H, 1997, NATURE, V385, P807, DOI 10.1038/385807a0
   Tillier A.-M., 1991, 114 C NAT SOC SAV PA, P291
   Tixier P J., 1995, Evolution Humana En Europa Y Los Yacimientos de La Sierra Atapuerca, P403
   Tryon CA, 2006, CURR ANTHROPOL, V47, P367, DOI 10.1086/503066
   Tuffreau A., 1987, THESIS
   Tuffreau A, 2008, ANTHROPOLOGIE, V112, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.anthro.2008.01.003
   Tuffreau A, 2017, ANTHROPOLOGIE, V121, P394, DOI 10.1016/j.anthro.2017.10.005
   Tuffreau A, 2010, QUATERN INT, V223, P455, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.02.012
   Vaesen K, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, pE2241, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1520288113
   Van Baelen A., 2017, The lower to Middle palaeolithic transition in northwestern Europe. Evidence from Kesselt-Op de Schans
   Vaquero M, 2018, J ARCHAEOL METHOD TH, V25, P334, DOI 10.1007/s10816-017-9339-x
   Villa P, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0160516
   Villa P, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0096424
   Villa P, 2009, SOURCEBOOK OF PALEOLITHIC TRANSITIONS, P265, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-76487-0_17
   Villa P, 2009, J ARCHAEOL SCI, V36, P850, DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2008.11.012
   Walker MJ, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P10087, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1107318108
   White M, 2003, CURR ANTHROPOL, V44, P598, DOI 10.1086/377653
   White M., 2011, QUATERNARY SCI, V14, P67
   White M., 2016, LITHICS THE J LITHIC, P27
   Wilkins J, 2012, SCIENCE, V338, P942, DOI 10.1126/science.1227608
   Wisniewski A, 2014, QUATERN INT, V326, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.10.027
   Wymer J., 1999, The Lower Palaeolithic Occupation of
   Wymer J. J., 1968, LOWER PALAEOLITHIC A
NR 200
TC 64
Z9 65
U1 1
U2 10
PU ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI LONDON
PA 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON NW1 7DX, ENGLAND
SN 0047-2484
J9 J HUM EVOL
JI J. Hum. Evol.
PD FEB
PY 2020
VL 139
AR 102735
DI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.102735
PG 25
WC Anthropology; Evolutionary Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Anthropology; Evolutionary Biology
GA KW4CZ
UT WOS:000521114500004
PM 32078934
OA Green Submitted, Green Published, Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Cardoso, CC
   Peripolli, V
   Amador, SA
   Brandao, EG
   Esteves, GIF
   Sousa, CMZ
   França, MFMS
   Gonçalves, FG
   Barbosa, FA
   Montalvao, TC
   Martins, CF
   Neto, AMF
   McManus, C
AF Cardoso, C. C.
   Peripolli, V.
   Amador, S. A.
   Brandao, E. G.
   Esteves, G. I. F.
   Sousa, C. M. Z.
   Franca, M. F. M. S.
   Goncalves, F. G.
   Barbosa, F. A.
   Montalvao, T. C.
   Martins, C. F.
   Fonseca Neto, A. M.
   McManus, C.
TI Physiological and thermographic response to heat stress in zebu cattle
SO LIVESTOCK SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Body traits; Heat stress; Physiology; Thermography
ID BOS-TAURUS; COWS; TOLERANCE; TRAITS; COAT
AB The objective of this study was to evaluate the heat tolerance of five zebu breeds using physical, physiological and hematological traits as well as thermographic responses. Forty cows of the Gir, Girolando, Nelore, Sindhi and Indubrasil breeds (eight cows each), approximately three years of age, were evaluated. Body weight, withers and hump heights as well as thoracic circumference were recorded. The density and length of the hair was obtained by collecting one square centimeter in the rump region and skin color using the CIELAB system. Rectal temperature, heart and respiratory rates were evaluated during the morning at 4:30 h, and in the afternoon, at 14:30 h, with six repetitions. Blood samples were collected for hematological evaluation. The surface temperature was obtained using an infrared camera FLIR (R) T400. Two images were taken from each animal, one laterally of the whole body and the other of the head region. Air temperature, wind speed, relative humidity were obtained from a mobile weather station. The statistics analysis included an analyzes of variance, principal factors, as well as cluster, discriminant and canonical analyzes, logistic regression and calculation of odds ratio. There were significant differences in the rectal temperature, heart and respiratory rates between breeds. Gir and Indubrasil breeds had the highest rectal temperatures. Breed was significant for surface temperatures and showed that physical and physiological factors affected breeds in different ways. Eye and brain surface temperatures were the most affected by environmental parameters. Also, environmental parameters affected packed cell volume and red cell number. Odds ratio test showed that the Gir breed was three times more likely to have higher rectal temperature compared with Sindhi as confirmed by the logistic regression. When the black globe temperature approached 35 degrees C, the probability of the Gir animals having rectal temperatures above normal was approximately 70%. Gir was the breed least adapted to climate conditions of the experiment while the Sindhi and Girolando breeds showed the best physiological response to thermal stress. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Cardoso, C. C.; Peripolli, V.; Amador, S. A.; Brandao, E. G.; Esteves, G. I. F.; Sousa, C. M. Z.; Franca, M. F. M. S.; Goncalves, F. G.; Barbosa, F. A.; Montalvao, T. C.; McManus, C.] Univ Brasilia, Fac Agron & Vet Med, Dept Anim Sci, BR-70910900 Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
   [Martins, C. F.; Fonseca Neto, A. M.] Embrapa Cerrados, Ctr Anim Prod Syst, Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
C3 Universidade de Brasilia; Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria
   (EMBRAPA)
RP Peripolli, V (corresponding author), Univ Brasilia, Fac Agron & Vet Med, BR-70910900 Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
EM vanessa.peripolli@hotmail.com
RI Martins, Carlos Frederico/HHC-7592-2022; Cardoso, Caio/B-6501-2013;
   Barbosa, Fernando/L-3836-2014; Pimentel, Concepta/I-4356-2012;
   Peripolli, Vanessa/C-8449-2018
OI Pimentel, Concepta/0000-0002-1106-8962; Martins, Carlos
   Frederico/0000-0001-8551-0146; Peripolli, Vanessa/0000-0002-0463-4727;
   martins, charles/0000-0002-5282-7961
FU CNPq; CAPES; CNPq Inct. Pecuaria (MCT/CNPq/FAPEMIG); Foundation for
   Research Support of the Distrito Federal (FAP-DF)
FX The authors thank CNPq and CAPES for scholarships, CNPq Inct. Pecuaria
   (MCT/CNPq/FAPEMIG) and the Foundation for Research Support of the
   Distrito Federal (FAP-DF), for the financial support, Embrapa Cerrados
   (Zebu Breeds Dairy Technology Transfer Center), for providing
   infrastructure.
CR Al-Haidary A, 2001, J ANIM SCI, V79, P1780
   [Anonymous], 1971, A Guide to Environmental Research on Animals
   Bianchini E, 2006, PESQUI AGROPECU BRAS, V41, P1443, DOI 10.1590/S0100-204X2006000900014
   Church JS, 2014, RES VET SCI, V96, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.11.006
   Collier R.J., 2010, ENV PHYSL LIVESTOCK
   Correa MPC, 2012, SMALL RUMINANT RES, V104, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.11.001
   da Silva RG, 2001, REV BRAS ZOOTECN, V30, P1939, DOI 10.1590/S1516-35982001000700034
   Delfi no L.J, 2012, AGROPECUARIA CIENTIF, V8, P01
   Finocchiaro R, 2005, J DAIRY SCI, V88, P1855, DOI 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72860-5
   Pereira AMF, 2014, J THERM BIOL, V45, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2014.08.004
   Hair J. F., 2010, Multivariate data analysis
   Hanna LLH, 2014, GENET SEL EVOL, V46, DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-46-4
   Hansen PJ, 2004, ANIM REPROD SCI, V82-3, P349, DOI 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.04.011
   Hayes BJ, 2013, TRENDS GENET, V29, P206, DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2012.11.009
   HOLMES CW, 1981, ANIM PROD, V32, P225, DOI 10.1017/S000335610002506X
   JAIN N. C., 1993, ESSENTIALS VET HEMAT
   da Costa ANL, 2015, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V59, P1647, DOI 10.1007/s00484-015-0971-4
   Maia ASC, 2005, LIVEST PROD SCI, V92, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.09.004
   Marai IFM, 2007, SMALL RUMINANT RES, V71, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.10.003
   Maziero R. R. D., 2012, Veterinaria e Zootecnia, V19, P366
   Mcmanus Concepta Margaret, 2014, Ciênc. anim. bras., V15, P152, DOI 10.1590/1809-6891v15i28726
   Nardone A, 2010, LIVEST SCI, V130, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.011
   O'Brien AMP, 2015, GENET SEL EVOL, V47, DOI 10.1186/s12711-015-0109-5
   Pacheco A., 2008, Revista Brasileira de Saude e Producao Animal, V9, P426
   Rebouças GF, 2008, REV BRAS ZOOTECN, V37, P1222, DOI 10.1590/S1516-35982008000700012
   Reece W.O., 2015, Dukes Physiology of Domestic Animals, V13th
   ROBBINS LS, 1993, CELL, V72, P827, DOI 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90572-8
   Santos S. A., 2005, Archivos de Zootecnia, V54, P237
   Scholtz M. M., 2013, Natural Science, V5, P106
   Silva RG., 2000, INTRO BIOCLIMATOLOGI, V1st edn
   Stewart M, 2007, PHYSIOL BEHAV, V92, P520, DOI 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.04.034
   Stewart M, 2005, ANIM WELFARE, V14, P319
   Swenson M J., 1996, Dukes Fisiologia dos Animais Domesticos
NR 33
TC 69
Z9 73
U1 0
U2 38
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1871-1413
EI 1878-0490
J9 LIVEST SCI
JI Livest. Sci.
PD DEC
PY 2015
VL 182
BP 83
EP 92
DI 10.1016/j.livsci.2015.10.022
PG 10
WC Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA CZ0DY
UT WOS:000366776500013
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Daoud, N
   Kadik, L
AF Daoud, Nassera
   Kadik, Leila
TI Spatio-temporal changes of the flora, climate impact and biodiversity
   prediction in the presaharan wadis South of Djelfa (Algeria)
SO ECOLOGICAL FRONTIERS
LA English
DT Article
DE Floristic changes; climate impact; biodiversity; wadis; Oum Laadham;
   Southern Djelfa
ID FLORISTIC DIVERSITY; VEGETATION; STEPPE; SOIL; DISTURBANCES;
   RESTORATION; ECOSYSTEMS; RANGELANDS; DESERT
AB The pre-Saharan region of southern Algeria is a vast area with a range ecosystems, including wadis. However, it is exposed to several anthropogenic and natural environmental stresses, including climate change, which have resulted in repeated and prolonged periods of drought. Such temporal environmental changes have led to alterations in the plant cover, which has negatively impacted the biodiversity of the region, especially endemic ones. Consequently, there have been socio-economic problems. This study aims to examine the impact of climatic changes on wadi flora and biodiversity in the arid region of Oum Laadham (South of the province of Djelfa). The study involved 90 releves during the spring season of the years 2011, 2015 and 2019, with mixed sampling carried out in wadi sites. The overall composition of plant species, biological and phytochoric types, Shannon-Weaver and Pielou indices were used to assess plant diversity. Variance analysis and multiple regression were applied to floristic data to determine the impact of environmental parameters on flora and biodiversity changes. The survey results showed that the Asteraceae family was dominant, and therophytes were the most common biological types, regadless of the year. Variance analysis indicated that the ecological conditions of the site had a significant impact on both floristic richness and flora diversity with a p-value<alpha (0.05). The Multiple regression analysis showed that yearly precipitation (mm) was positively correlated with floristic richness), the global recovery of vegetation, and the Shannon-Weaver and Pielou indices, regardless the year considered. In recent years, climatic disturbance have led to changes in the flora and its distribution in the region. To effectively address these challenges, it is recommended to implement sustainable management practices that focus on water conservation and reforestation with native species, and continuous monitoring of the region's biodiversity. These efforts, combined with climate adaptation strategies, are essential for preserving the unique flora of Oum Laadham area and supporting the local communities dependent on these ecosystems.
C1 [Daoud, Nassera; Kadik, Leila] Univ Sci & Technol Houari Boumedienne, Lab Plant Ecol & Environm, LEVE, BP 32 Alia, Algiers, Algeria.
   [Daoud, Nassera] Univ Ziane Achour Djelfa, Fac Life Sci & Life, Dept Biol, Cite 05 Juillet Route Moudjbara BP: 3117,17000BP, Djelfa, Algeria.
C3 University Science & Technology Houari Boumediene; Universite de Djelfa
RP Daoud, N (corresponding author), Univ Sci & Technol Houari Boumedienne, Lab Plant Ecol & Environm, LEVE, BP 32 Alia, Algiers, Algeria.
EM n.daoud@univ-djelfa.dz
CR Aidoud A., 1989, These de Doctorat, P240
   Aidoud A., 1983, These doct. 3cycle, P180
   Aidoud Ahmed, 2006, Secheresse (Montrouge), V17, P19
   Aidoud Ahmed, 2011, Ecologia Mediterranea, V37, P17
   Aidoud-Lounis F., 1984, These 3e cycle, V253, P1984
   Al-Robai S. A., 2017, Annals of Agricultural Science (Cairo), V62, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.aoas.2017.04.001
   Al-Sodany YM, 2020, EGYPT J BOT, V60, P325, DOI 10.21608/ejbo.2019.6512.1257
   Azizi M, 2021, J KING SAUD UNIV SCI, V33, DOI 10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101656
   BARBERO M, 1990, VEGETATIO, V87, P151, DOI 10.1007/BF00042952
   Barbero M., 2011, Bocconea, V13, P11
   Bekai F., 2019, These de Doctorat, P127
   Benabadji Noury, 2009, Ecologia Mediterranea, V35, P75
   Boubakeur G, 2017, INT J GLOBAL WARM, V12, P66, DOI 10.1504/IJGW.2017.10004841
   Boughani A., 2014, Thesede Doctorat, P184
   Boumakhleb A., 2014, Revue des Bioressources, V4, P29
   BRAUN-BLANQUET J., 1957, AN ESTAC EXPTL AULA DEI, V5, P1
   DAGET P  ..., 1980, Recherches d'ecologie theorique, les strategies adaptatives, P89
   Dahmani-Megrerouche M., 1997, These. Doct. Etat, P330
   Dajoz R., 1982, Precis d'ecologie : Ecologie fondamentale et appliquee, P503
   Dalila N., 2008, VERTIGO, V8, P1, DOI DOI 10.4000/VERTIGO.5375
   Daoud N., 2022, Revue Agrobiol, V12, P2905
   Dhief A., 2022, GSC Biol Pharm Sci, V18, P250, DOI [10.30574/gscbps.2022.18.3.0081, DOI 10.30574/GSCBPS.2022.18.3.0081]
   Djebaili S, 1984, Steppe Algerienne: Phytosociologique et Ecologie, P177
   Dobignard A., 2010, Index synonymique flore d'Afrique du nord pteridophyta Gymnospermae Monocotyledoneae. (Conservati)
   Erian W., 2010, Drought vulnerability in the Arab region: Special case study: Syria, global Assessment on disaster Risk Reduction, P1
   Fan CY, 2017, BMC ECOL, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12898-017-0143-y
   Frontier S., 2008, Ecosystemes: Structure, Fonctionnement, Evolution, P558
   Frontier S, 1983, Collection d'ecologie, V17, P494
   Gamoun M., 2012, Revue d'Ecologie (LaTerre et la Vie), V67, P271, DOI [10.3406/revec.2012.1966, DOI 10.3406/REVEC.2012.1966]
   Gamoun M, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10030313
   Gamoun Mouldi, 2010, Ecologia Mediterranea, V36, P5
   Ghezlaoui Baha-Eddine, 2011, Acta Botanica Malacitana, V36, P113
   Guesmi B., 2014, Revue des BioRessources, V4, P8
   Guesmi B., 2009, Memoire de Magistere, P120
   Habib Noureddine, 2020, Acta Botanica Malacitana, V45, P37, DOI [10.24310/abm.v45i0.7987, 10.24310/abm.v45i.7987]
   Hachmi Azeddine, 2023, Ekologia (Bratislava), V42, P122, DOI 10.2478/eko-2023-0015
   Haddouche I, 2008, NEW MEDIT, V7, P25
   Harrison S, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P4464, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1921724117
   Heneidy S Z., 2001, Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, V4, P1323, DOI [10.3923/pjbs.2001.1323.1330, DOI 10.3923/PJBS.2001.1323.1330]
   HOLZAPFEL C, 1992, FLORA, V186, P261
   Jiao F, 2011, CATENA, V86, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2011.03.001
   Kadi-Hanifi Achour H., 1998, These Doctorat Es Science
   Khedr AH, 2002, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V11, P1809, DOI 10.1023/A:1020312108530
   Kompani-Zare M, 2011, CATENA, V86, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2011.03.008
   Korell L, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22766-0
   Le Floch E., 2002, SESS 2 DEGR REH TERR, P45
   Le Houerou H.N, 1980, FOURRAGES LIGNEUX AF, P57
   Macheroum A, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108279
   Malcolm JR, 2006, CONSERV BIOL, V20, P538, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00364.x
   MCKEE TB, 1993, P 8 C APPL CLIM AN C
   Moore A.W., 2006, Handb. Biosurveillance, P235, DOI [10.1016/B978-012369378-5/50017-X, DOI 10.1016/B978-012369378-5/50017-X]
   Motulsky H, 2012, Biostatistique une approche intuitive, P492
   Nichane M., 2015, Algerian J. Arid Environ., V1, P56
   Ould Sidi Mohamed Y., 2003, These de doctorat en bio, P245
   Ozenda P, 2004, FLORE VEGETATION SAH, P662
   PROJET MATE-PNUD-FEM, 2015, Rapport Final, V118
   QUEZEL P, 1983, Bothalia, V14, P411
   Quezel P., 1962, Nouvelle flore de l'Algerie et des regions desertiques meridionales
   Salama F, 2013, TURK J BOT, V37, P489, DOI 10.3906/bot-1205-10
   Sharma TC, 1997, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V11, P35, DOI 10.1023/A:1007904718057
   Slimani H, 2018, Rev. d'Ecol, P293, DOI [10.3406/revec.2018.1936, DOI 10.3406/REVEC.2018.1936]
   Solomon S., 2007, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group Ito the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, P996
   Tabet M., 2002, Impacts des changements climatiques et de l'ozone sur la biodiversite, Recueil Des Communications du Projet ALG/97/G31 "Plan d'Action et Strategie Nationale sur la Biodiversite, VVI
   Taibaoui B., 2020, Lejeunia, Revue de Botanique, V23, P41, DOI [10.25518/0457-4184.2265, DOI 10.25518/0457-4184.2265]
   Taibaoui B., 2022, These de Doctorat, P160
   Triola Marc M., 2012, Biostatiqtiques pour les sciences de la vie et de la sante, P367
   Vennetier M., 2010, Changement climatique et biodiversite, P75
   Vennetier M, 2008, ANN FOREST SCI, V65, DOI 10.1051/forest:2008050
   von Hardenberg J, 2001, PHYS REV LETT, V87, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.198101
   WILLIAMS P H, 1991, Australian Systematic Botany, V4, P665, DOI 10.1071/SB9910665
   Xu XL, 2008, CATENA, V75, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2008.04.016
   Zitouni W, 2010, Memoire de Magister, P199
NR 72
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
EI 2950-5097
J9 ECOL FRONT
JI Ecol. Front.
PD OCT
PY 2024
VL 44
IS 5
BP 981
EP 1001
DI 10.1016/j.ecofro.2024.01.008
PG 21
WC Ecology
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA M0L5L
UT WOS:001354547800001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sreekanth, D
   Pawar, DV
   Mahesh, S
   Chethan, CR
   Sondhia, S
   Singh, PK
   Mishra, JS
   Mukkamula, N
   Kumar, BK
   Basavaraj, PS
AF Sreekanth, Dasari
   Pawar, Deepak Vishwanath
   Mahesh, Survi
   Chethan, C. R.
   Sondhia, Shobha
   Singh, P. K.
   Mishra, J. S.
   Mukkamula, Nagaraju
   Kumar, B. Kiran
   Basavaraj, P. S.
TI Elucidating the interactive effects of drought, weeds, and herbicides on
   the physiological, biochemical, and yield characteristics of rice
SO PLANT AND SOIL
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Drought stress; Rice; A. paronychioides; E. Colona; Herbicide efficacy;
   Cyhalofop plus penoxsulam
ID ORYZA-SATIVA L.; ABIOTIC STRESS RESPONSES; WATER-DEFICIT; SOIL-MOISTURE;
   IRRIGATION WATER; CARBON-DIOXIDE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ASCORBIC-ACID;
   METABOLISM; MANAGEMENT
AB Aims Rice yields are significantly influenced by both biotic and abiotic factors, like drought stress and weed infestation being prominent contributors to substantial crop losses. Environmental conditions, including drought stress, can impact the effectiveness of herbicides. This study aims to investigate the impact of drought stress on the efficacy of the herbicide (cyhalofop + penoxsulam) against the weed species, Echinochloa colona (L.) Link, and Alternanthera paronychioides A. St.-Hil. Additionally, the study aims to assess the potential consequences of improper weed control, including the survival of weeds and their subsequent adverse effects on rice. Methods The herbicide was applied to rice plants under two distinct conditions: well-watered (WW) and drought-stressed (DS) at 8 days following the suspension of irrigation. The herbicide's effectiveness against two weed species, E. colona and A. paronychioides, was assessed by quantifying weed growth and biomass. Results The findings elucidate a reduction in the herbicide efficacy against both the weeds under DS conditions. However, under DS the decline in herbicide effectiveness was more significant against E. colona than A. paronychioides, leading to inadequate weed control. As a result, the survival of these weeds further exacerbates oxidative stress in rice plants. The magnitude of oxidative stress was excess in rice with E. colona than A. paronychioides, and it significantly reduced the yield under both WW and DS. Conclusions The study highlighted that under drought conditions rice is more susceptible to E. colona infestation than to A. paronychioides with increased oxidative stress and reduced yield. The study underscores the critical importance of understanding complex interactions between multiple environmental factors in developing adaptive, climate-resilient weed management strategies, essential for safeguarding rice yields against the combined impacts of drought stress and weed interference, and addressing climate change-related challenges to food security.
C1 [Sreekanth, Dasari; Pawar, Deepak Vishwanath; Chethan, C. R.; Sondhia, Shobha; Singh, P. K.; Mishra, J. S.] ICAR Directorate Weed Res DWR, Jabalpur 482004, Madhya Pradesh, India.
   [Mahesh, Survi] Univ Catholique Louvain UCLouvain, Louvain Inst Biomol Sci & Technol LIBST, Crouix sud 4-5-L7 07-14 B-353, B-1348 Louvain la Neuve, Belgium.
   [Mukkamula, Nagaraju; Kumar, B. Kiran] Osmania Univ, Dept Bot, Hyderabad 500007, Telangana, India.
   [Basavaraj, P. S.] ICAR Natl Inst Abiot Stress Management, Baramati 413115, Maharashtra, India.
C3 Osmania University; Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR); ICAR
   - National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management
RP Sreekanth, D (corresponding author), ICAR Directorate Weed Res DWR, Jabalpur 482004, Madhya Pradesh, India.
EM sreekanthplantsciences@gmail.com; pawardv1@gmail.com;
   mahesh.survi@uclouvain.be; Chethan.R@icar.gov.in;
   shobhasondia@gmail.com; drsinghpk@gmail.com; jsmishra31@gmail.com;
   rajuplantscience@osmania.ac.in; kiran.nrcpb@gmail.com;
   Basavaraj.ps@icar.gov.in
RI P S, Basavaraj/ADB-3919-2022
OI P S, Basavaraj/0000-0001-6071-8987
FU ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research
FX The authors express gratitude to the ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research
   for the essential facilities and financial assistance.
CR Abd-Elrahman SH, 2022, J SOIL SCI PLANT NUT, DOI [10.1007/542729-022-00799-8, 10.1007/s42729-022-00799-8]
   Abdelaal K, 2022, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/agriculture12122084
   Aebi H, 1974, METHODS ENZYMATIC AN, V2, P673, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-091302-2.50032-3, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-091302-2.50032-3]
   Afifi M, 2012, WEED SCI, V60, P542, DOI 10.1614/WS-D-12-00013.1
   Agostinetto D, 2017, PLANTA DANINHA, V35, DOI 10.1590/S0100-83582017350100044
   Ahmed S, 2021, GENOMICS, V113, P1029, DOI 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.10.037
   Ali MAA, 2024, J SOIL SCI PLANT NUT, V24, P54, DOI 10.1007/s42729-023-01586-9
   Alizade S, 2021, WEED RES, V61, P288, DOI 10.1111/wre.12477
   Alizade S, 2020, CROP PROT, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105292
   Ansari MI, 2021, PLANT GROWTH REGUL, V94, P131, DOI 10.1007/s10725-021-00710-y
   Asada K, 2006, PLANT PHYSIOL, V141, P391, DOI 10.1104/pp.106.082040
   Bahuguna RN, 2015, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V154, P543, DOI 10.1111/ppl.12299
   Bajwa AA, 2015, CROP PROT, V75, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.cropro.2015.06.001
   Bangar P, 2019, TURK J BIOL, V43, P58, DOI 10.3906/biy-1801-64
   BARRS HD, 1962, AUST J BIOL SCI, V15, P413, DOI 10.1071/BI9620413
   BATES LS, 1973, PLANT SOIL, V39, P205, DOI 10.1007/BF00018060
   BEAUCHAM.C, 1971, ANAL BIOCHEM, V44, P276, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8
   Chahal PS, 2018, WEED SCI, V66, P738, DOI 10.1017/wsc.2018.47
   Chauhan BS, 2010, WEED SCI, V58, P132, DOI 10.1614/WS-D-09-00016.1
   Chauhan BS, 2014, ADV AGRON, V123, P65, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-420225-2.00002-9
   Directorate of Economics and Statistics, 2019, About us
   Doklega SMA, 2024, J CROP HEALTH, V76, P235, DOI 10.1007/s10343-023-00947-9
   El-Bially M, 2018, AGR WATER MANAGE, V208, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.06.016
   El-Bially ME, 2022, GESUNDE PFLANZ, V74, P603, DOI 10.1007/s10343-022-00635-0
   El-Metwally I, 2022, ARCH AGRON SOIL SCI, V68, P1103, DOI 10.1080/03650340.2020.1869723
   El-Metwally IM, 2022, J SOIL SCI PLANT NUT, V22, P5217, DOI 10.1007/s42729-022-00997-4
   El-Metwally IM, 2021, ITAL J AGROMETEOROL, P81, DOI 10.36253/ijam-872
   El-Metwally IM, 2021, GESUNDE PFLANZ, V73, P407, DOI 10.1007/s10343-021-00557-3
   El-Metwally IM, 2021, J SOIL SCI PLANT NUT, V21, P238, DOI 10.1007/s42729-020-00356-1
   Faisal Summiya, 2019, Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, V22, P213, DOI 10.1007/s12892-018-0166-0
   FAO, 2019, Food supply-crops primary equivalent database
   Farooq M, 2009, SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, P153, DOI 10.1051/agro:2008021
   Foyer CH, 2005, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V28, P1056, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01327.x
   Froud-Williams R. J., 1996, Aspects of Applied Biology, P187
   FUKAI S, 1995, FIELD CROP RES, V40, P67, DOI 10.1016/0378-4290(94)00096-U
   Gal J, 2015, WEED SCI, V63, P888, DOI 10.1614/WS-D-15-00039.1
   Hadid ML, 2023, NOT BOT HORTI AGROBO, V51, DOI 10.15835/nbha51313291
   Hartmann H, 2013, NEW PHYTOL, V200, P340, DOI 10.1111/nph.12331
   Heap I., 2014, Integrated Pest Management, P281
   Heap I, 2018, PEST MANAG SCI, V74, P1040, DOI 10.1002/ps.4760
   HEATH RL, 1968, ARCH BIOCHEM BIOPHYS, V125, P189, DOI 10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1
   Hodges DM, 1996, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V98, P685, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1996.tb06672.x
   Hussain S., 2019, Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-06118-09, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-06118-09]
   Hussain S, 2018, ACTA PHYSIOL PLANT, V40, DOI 10.1007/s11738-018-2710-z
   Jabran K, 2018, PEST MANAG SCI, V74, P766, DOI 10.1002/ps.4788
   Jaspers P, 2010, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V138, P405, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01321.x
   KAR M, 1976, PLANT PHYSIOL, V57, P315, DOI 10.1104/pp.57.2.315
   Khaffagy AE, 2022, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/agronomy12051037
   Kumar Santosh, 2014, Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, V19, P87, DOI 10.1007/s40502-014-0075-x
   Lata C, 2011, J EXP BOT, V62, P4731, DOI 10.1093/jxb/err210
   Lawlor DW, 2002, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V25, P275, DOI 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00814.x
   Leakey ADB, 2004, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V10, P951, DOI 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00767.x
   Lesk C, 2016, NATURE, V529, P84, DOI 10.1038/nature16467
   Li C, 2022, FRONT PLANT SCI, V13, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2022.979956
   LICHTENTHALER HK, 1987, METHOD ENZYMOL, V148, P350
   LOWRY OH, 1951, J BIOL CHEM, V193, P265
   Mahajan G, 2015, AGRON J, V107, P1573, DOI 10.2134/agronj14.0508
   Makhlouf BSI, 2022, J SOIL SCI PLANT NUT, V22, P1676, DOI 10.1007/s42729-022-00762-7
   Maksup S, 2014, J PLANT INTERACT, V9, P43, DOI 10.1080/17429145.2012.752042
   Matiu M, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0178339
   Matloob A, 2015, CROP PROT, V71, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.cropro.2015.01.009
   Matzrafi M, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-38729-x
   MCCREADY RM, 1950, ANAL CHEM, V22, P1156, DOI 10.1021/ac60045a016
   McKenzie-Gopsill AG, 2019, WEED RES, V59, P288, DOI 10.1111/wre.12365
   Miller MR, 2018, WEED SCI, V66, P418, DOI 10.1017/wsc.2018.21
   Mishra SS, 2018, PHYSIOL MOL BIOL PLA, V24, P1035, DOI 10.1007/s12298-018-0606-4
   Mohammadi A., 2018, Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, V111, P63
   Mubarak M, 2021, J SOIL SCI PLANT NUT, V21, P2020, DOI 10.1007/s42729-021-00498-w
   MUKHERJEE SP, 1983, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V58, P166, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1983.tb04162.x
   Nandula VK, 2019, WEED SCI, V67, P149, DOI 10.1017/wsc.2018.88
   Nezhadahmadi A, 2013, SCI WORLD J, DOI 10.1155/2013/610721
   Noureldin NA, 2013, EGYPT J REMOTE SENS, V16, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrs.2013.04.005
   Nugroho LH., 2016, J ANIM PLANT SCI, V26, P225
   Oliva R, 2019, NAT BIOTECHNOL, V37, P1344, DOI 10.1038/s41587-019-0267-z
   PATTERSON DT, 1989, WEED SCI, V37, P658, DOI 10.1017/S0043174500072593
   PATTERSON DT, 1995, WEED SCI, V43, P483, DOI 10.1017/S0043174500081510
   Pawar Deepak, 2022, Indian Journal of Weed Science, V54, P129, DOI 10.5958/0974-8164.2022.00025.9
   Polle A, 2001, PLANT PHYSIOL, V126, P445, DOI 10.1104/pp.126.1.445
   Ramadan KMA, 2023, NOT BOT HORTI AGROBO, V51, DOI 10.15835/nbha51413437
   Ramadan KMA, 2023, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/agronomy13051227
   Ramesh K, 2017, FRONT PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.00095
   Rao AN, 2007, ADV AGRON, V93, P153, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2113(06)93004-1
   Ray DK, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0066428
   Rollins JA, 2013, J EXP BOT, V64, P3201, DOI 10.1093/jxb/ert158
   Saad-Allah KM, 2022, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/agronomy12010059
   SAIRAM RK, 1994, PLANT GROWTH REGUL, V14, P173, DOI 10.1007/BF00025220
   Salehi-Lisar S Y., 2016, Drought stress tolerance in plants, Vol, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28899-41
   Salem EMM, 2022, GESUNDE PFLANZ, V74, P539, DOI 10.1007/s10343-022-00629-y
   Salem EMM, 2021, COMMUN SOIL SCI PLAN, V52, P1745, DOI 10.1080/00103624.2021.1892733
   Sasi M, 2021, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V185, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104413
   Saudy HS, 2015, COMMUN SOIL SCI PLAN, V46, P913, DOI 10.1080/00103624.2015.1011753
   Saudy HS, 2009, J CENT EUR AGRIC, V10, P41
   Saudy H, 2021, GESUNDE PFLANZ, V73, P169, DOI 10.1007/s10343-020-00535-1
   Saudy HS, 2023, GESUNDE PFLANZ, V75, P899, DOI 10.1007/s10343-022-00736-w
   Saudy HS, 2021, CROP PROT, V149, DOI 10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105755
   Saudy HS, 2020, J ARID LAND, V12, P630, DOI 10.1007/s40333-020-0020-y
   Saudy HS, 2022, J SOIL SCI PLANT NUT, V22, P5195, DOI 10.1007/s42729-022-00995-6
   Saudy HS, 2023, GESUNDE PFLANZ, V75, P647, DOI 10.1007/s10343-022-00729-9
   Saudy HS, 2023, COMMUN SOIL SCI PLAN, V54, P22, DOI 10.1080/00103624.2022.2109659
   Saudy HS, 2021, GESUNDE PFLANZ, V73, P555, DOI 10.1007/s10343-021-00577-z
   Saudy HS, 2019, COMMUN SOIL SCI PLAN, V50, P1821, DOI 10.1080/00103624.2019.1635147
   Saudy HS, 2015, ARCH AGRON SOIL SCI, V61, P1, DOI 10.1080/03650340.2014.920499
   Saudy HS, 2014, ARCH AGRON SOIL SCI, V60, P1077, DOI 10.1080/03650340.2013.866226
   SCHMUGGE TJ, 1980, WATER RESOUR RES, V16, P961, DOI 10.1029/WR016i006p00961
   Shaaban A, 2023, J SOIL SCI PLANT NUT, V23, P3735, DOI 10.1007/s42729-023-01294-4
   Siaut M, 2011, BMC BIOTECHNOL, V11, DOI 10.1186/1472-6750-11-7
   Singh M, 2015, SOIL TILL RES, V147, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2014.11.007
   SINGLETON V. L., 1965, AMER J ENOL VITICULT, V16, P144
   Skelton JJ, 2016, WEED BIOL MANAG, V16, P34, DOI 10.1111/wbm.12092
   Sreekanth D, 2023, CURR SCI INDIA, V124, P686, DOI 10.18520/cs/v124/i6/686-692
   Sreekanth D, 2024, PLANT GROWTH REGUL, V103, P119, DOI 10.1007/s10725-023-01089-8
   TANAKA T, 1993, PHYTOCHEMISTRY, V33, P779, DOI 10.1016/0031-9422(93)85274-U
   United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World population ageing 2019: highlights
   Varanasi VK, 2016, WEED SCI, V64, P231, DOI 10.1614/WS-D-15-00152.1
   Weller SL, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-47237-x
   Wrobel K., 2005, J Agric Food Chem, V53, P220
   Wu GL, 2010, ECOTOXICOLOGY, V19, P124, DOI 10.1007/s10646-009-0396-0
   Wu LM, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0214480
   Xie HS, 1996, WEED RES, V36, P65, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1996.tb01802.x
   XIE HS, 1993, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V33, P283, DOI 10.1016/0098-8472(93)90074-P
   Yamazaki JY, 2010, PHOTOSYNTH RES, V105, P63, DOI 10.1007/s11120-010-9567-3
   Zafar SA, 2017, PAK J BOT, V49, P453
   Zhu R, 2020, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V169, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103901
   Ziska LH, 2016, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V231, P304, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2016.07.014
   Ziska LH, 2004, WEED SCI, V52, P584, DOI 10.1614/WS-03-161R
NR 125
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 3
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 0032-079X
EI 1573-5036
J9 PLANT SOIL
JI Plant Soil
PD 2024 OCT 1
PY 2024
DI 10.1007/s11104-024-06979-y
EA OCT 2024
PG 25
WC Agronomy; Plant Sciences; Soil Science
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Plant Sciences
GA H9Q1X
UT WOS:001326697400004
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Evans, AE
   Jarnevich, CS
   Beaury, EM
   Engelstad, PS
   Teich, NB
   Laroe, JM
   Bradley, BA
AF Evans, Annette E.
   Jarnevich, Catherine S.
   Beaury, Evelyn M.
   Engelstad, Peder S.
   Teich, Nathan B.
   Laroe, Jillian M.
   Bradley, Bethany A.
TI Shifting hotspots: Climate change projected to drive contractions and
   expansions of invasive plant abundance habitats
SO DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE biogeography; habitat suitability; invasion hotspot; invasive plant;
   invasive species; proactive management; range shift; species
   distribution model
ID DISTRIBUTION MODELS; NONNATIVE PLANTS; ECONOMIC COSTS; GROWTH;
   MANAGEMENT; IMPACTS; EVOLUTION; PACKAGE; RISK
AB AimPreventing the spread of range-shifting invasive species is a top priority for mitigating the impacts of climate change. Invasive plants become abundant and cause negative impacts in only a fraction of their introduced ranges, yet projections of invasion risk are almost exclusively derived from models built using all non-native occurrences and neglect abundance information.LocationEastern USA.MethodsWe compiled abundance records for 144 invasive plant species from five major growth forms. We fit over 600 species distribution models based on occurrences of abundant plant populations, thus projecting which areas in the eastern United States (U.S.) will be most susceptible to invasion under current and +2 degrees C climate change.ResultsWe identified current invasive plant hotspots in the Great Lakes region, mid-Atlantic region, and along the northeast coast of Florida and Georgia, each climatically suitable for abundant populations of over 30 invasive plant species. Under a +2 degrees C climate change scenario, hotspots will shift an average of 213 km, predominantly towards the northeast U.S., where some areas are projected to become suitable for up to 21 new invasive plant species. Range shifting species could exacerbate impacts of up to 40 invasive species projected to sustain populations within existing hotspots. On the other hand, within the eastern U.S., 62% of species will experience decreased suitability for abundant populations with climate change. This trend is consistent across five plant growth forms.Main ConclusionsWe produced species range maps and state-specific watch lists from these analyses, which can inform proactive regulation, monitoring, and management of invasive plants most likely to cause future ecological impacts. Additionally, areas we identify as becoming less suitable for abundant populations could be prioritized for restoration of climate-adapted native species. This research provides a first comprehensive assessment of risk from abundant plant invasions across the eastern U.S.
C1 [Evans, Annette E.; Bradley, Bethany A.] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Environm Conservat, Amherst, MA USA.
   [Jarnevich, Catherine S.; Laroe, Jillian M.] US Geol Survey, Ft Collins Sci Ctr, Ft Collins, CO USA.
   [Beaury, Evelyn M.] Princeton Univ, High Meadows Environm Inst, Princeton, NJ USA.
   [Engelstad, Peder S.] Colorado State Univ, Nat Resource Ecol Lab, Ft Collins, CO USA.
   [Teich, Nathan B.] Colorado State Univ, Grad Degree Program Ecol, Ft Collins, CO USA.
   [Evans, Annette E.] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Environm Conservat, Amherst, MA 01003 USA.
C3 University of Massachusetts System; University of Massachusetts Amherst;
   United States Department of the Interior; United States Geological
   Survey; Princeton University; Colorado State University; Colorado State
   University; University of Massachusetts System; University of
   Massachusetts Amherst
RP Evans, AE (corresponding author), Univ Massachusetts, Dept Environm Conservat, Amherst, MA 01003 USA.
EM evans.annette9@gmail.com
RI Bradley, Bethany/B-1964-2008; Engelstad, Peder/GXM-8524-2022
OI Jarnevich, Catherine/0000-0002-9699-2336; Engelstad,
   Peder/0000-0002-3681-9216; Beaury, Evelyn/0000-0002-7971-3593
FU National Science Foundation; U.S. Geological Survey Science Analytics
   and Synthesis Program; U.S. Geological Survey [G21AC10233-01]; Northeast
   Climate Adaptation Science Center (NE CASC); National Science Foundation
   Graduate Research Internship Program award
FX Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes
   only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Thank you to
   Brandon Hays for modelling assistance, Erin Jerome for assistance with
   ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst, and Toni Lyn Morelli for feedback on earlier
   versions of this manuscript. The U.S. Geological Survey Science
   Analytics and Synthesis Program and Invasive Species Program supported
   development of the modelling backbone. AEE is supported by funding from
   the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Northeast Climate Adaptation Science
   Center (NE CASC) through Grant No. G21AC10233-01. The National Science
   Foundation Graduate Research Internship Program award to support EMB.
CR Abatzoglou JT, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2017.191
   Aiello-Lammens ME, 2015, ECOGRAPHY, V38, P541, DOI 10.1111/ecog.01132
   Allen JM, 2016, BIOL CONSERV, V203, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.015
   Ash JD, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P1305, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13429
   Baer KC, 2022, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V518, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120249
   Bailey RG, 2009, ECOSYSTEM GEOGRAPHY: FROM ECOREGIONS TO SITES, SECOND EDITION, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-89516-1_1
   Beaury EM, 2023, BIOL INVASIONS, V25, P3471, DOI 10.1007/s10530-023-03118-z
   Beaury EM, 2021, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V19, P550, DOI 10.1002/fee.2392
   Beaury EM, 2021, J APPL ECOL, V58, P1957, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.13934
   Beaury EM, 2020, BIOL INVASIONS, V22, P233, DOI 10.1007/s10530-019-02087-6
   Beckage B, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P4197, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0708921105
   Bellard C, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P3740, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12344
   Bezeng BS, 2017, ECOSPHERE, V8, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1694
   Bonser SP, 2005, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V18, P1009, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00904.x
   Bradley BA, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P9919, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1818081116
   Bradley BA, 2018, ECOSPHERE, V9, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2302
   Bradley BA, 2016, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V31, P19, DOI 10.1007/s10980-015-0303-4
   Bradley BA, 2013, BIOL INVASIONS, V15, P1417, DOI 10.1007/s10530-012-0380-0
   Bradley BA, 2010, BIOL INVASIONS, V12, P1855, DOI 10.1007/s10530-009-9597-y
   Bradley BA, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P1511, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01824.x
   Calenge C, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V197, P516, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.017
   Catford JA, 2016, J ECOL, V104, P1745, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12627
   Catford JA, 2011, DIVERS DISTRIB, V17, P1099, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00794.x
   Diaz S, 1997, J VEG SCI, V8, P463, DOI 10.2307/3237198
   Dormann CF, 2013, ECOGRAPHY, V36, P27, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
   Elith J, 2010, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V1, P330, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00036.x
   Engelstad P, 2022, PLOS ONE, V17, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0263056
   Evans A., 2022, DATA DATASETS, DOI [10.7275/xrp1-rf69, DOI 10.7275/XRP1-RF69]
   Freeman EA, 2008, J STAT SOFTW, V23, P1
   Giorgis MA, 2016, BIOL INVASIONS, V18, P2017, DOI 10.1007/s10530-016-1148-8
   Guerin GR, 2019, APPL VEG SCI, V22, P582, DOI 10.1111/avsc.12448
   Hellmann JJ, 2008, CONSERV BIOL, V22, P534, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00951.x
   Hess MCM, 2019, ECOL ENG, V127, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.11.011
   Hijmans R. J., 2022, Package 'terra'
   Hirzel AH, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V199, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.017
   Hulme PE, 2006, J APPL ECOL, V43, P835, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01227.x
   Humair F, 2015, CONSERV BIOL, V29, P1658, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12579
   Jarnevich CS, 2021, DIVERS DISTRIB, V27, P2454, DOI 10.1111/ddi.13414
   Jarnevich CS, 2015, ECOL INFORM, V29, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.06.007
   Johnston A, 2015, ECOL APPL, V25, P1749, DOI 10.1890/14-1826.1
   Kuebbing SE, 2015, NEOBIOTA, V25, P73, DOI 10.3897/neobiota.25.8921
   Lakoba VT, 2020, BIOSCIENCE, V70, P804, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biaa081
   Latombe G, 2022, BIOL INVASIONS, V24, P3147, DOI 10.1007/s10530-022-02836-0
   Lehan NE, 2013, AM J BOT, V100, P1287, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1300061
   Lund U., 2017, PACKAGE CIRCULARREPO
   Mainka SA, 2010, INTEGR ZOOL, V5, P102, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2010.00193.x
   Mod HK, 2016, J VEG SCI, V27, P1308, DOI 10.1111/jvs.12444
   Morisette JT, 2013, ECOGRAPHY, V36, P129, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07815.x
   Naimi B, 2022, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V28, P5654, DOI 10.1111/gcb.16310
   Ni M, 2021, DIVERS DISTRIB, V27, P1194, DOI 10.1111/ddi.13267
   O'Donnell J, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P617, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02537.x
   O'Neill MW, 2021, BIOL INVASIONS, V23, P1249, DOI 10.1007/s10530-020-02433-z
   O'Reilly-Nugent A, 2020, J ECOL, V108, P449, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13280
   Omernik JM, 2014, ENVIRON MANAGE, V54, P1249, DOI 10.1007/s00267-014-0364-1
   Parker I.M., 1999, Biological Invasions, V1, P3, DOI 10.1023/A:1010034312781
   Pearse IS, 2019, ECOL LETT, V22, P1214, DOI 10.1111/ele.13284
   Peters CB, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V616, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.015
   Phillips SJ, 2009, ECOL APPL, V19, P181, DOI 10.1890/07-2153.1
   Pimentel D, 2005, ECOL ECON, V52, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002
   Pimentel D, 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P53, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0053:EAECON]2.3.CO;2
   Pournelle G. H., 1953, Journal of Mammalogy, V34, P133
   Pysek P, 2010, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V35, P25, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-033009-095548
   Qin Y, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P459, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0746-8
   Rayamajhi MB, 2016, INVAS PLANT SCI MANA, V9, P195, DOI 10.1614/IPSM-D-16-00022.1
   Rejmanek M., 2002, TURNING THE TIDE, P249
   Ricciardi A, 2021, ENVIRON REV, V29, P119, DOI 10.1139/er-2020-0088
   Richardson David M., 2000, Diversity and Distributions, V6, P93, DOI 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x
   Rowe N, 2005, NEW PHYTOL, V166, P61, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01309.x
   Santini L, 2021, DIVERS DISTRIB, V27, P1035, DOI 10.1111/ddi.13252
   Seager R, 2018, EARTH INTERACT, V22, P1, DOI 10.1175/EI-D-17-0011.1
   Sofaer HR, 2018, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V27, P658, DOI 10.1111/geb.12726
   Spear MJ, 2021, BIOSCIENCE, V71, P357, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biaa168
   USDA, 2022, The PLANTS database
   Valavi R, 2022, ECOL MONOGR, V92, DOI 10.1002/ecm.1486
   Van der Veken S, 2008, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V6, P212, DOI 10.1890/070063
   Vander Zanden MJ, 2008, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V65, P1512, DOI 10.1139/F08-099
   Verberk W., 2011, Nature Education Knowledge, V3, P38
   Vilà M, 2011, ECOL LETT, V14, P702, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x
   Waldock C, 2022, ECOGRAPHY, V2022, DOI 10.1111/ecog.05694
   Wallace RD, 2014, CABI INVASIVE SER, V4, P219, DOI 10.1079/9781780641645.0219
   Walther GR, 2009, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V24, P686, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.008
   Weidlich EWA, 2020, J APPL ECOL, V57, P1806, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.13656
   Westbrooks RG, 2004, WEED TECHNOL, V18, P1468, DOI 10.1614/0890-037X(2004)018[1468:NAFEDA]2.0.CO;2
   Wisz MS, 2008, DIVERS DISTRIB, V14, P763, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00482.x
   Yannelli FA, 2020, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2020.00238
   Yokomizo H, 2009, ECOL APPL, V19, P376, DOI 10.1890/08-0442.1
   Young NE, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0229253
NR 87
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 11
U2 33
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1366-9516
EI 1472-4642
J9 DIVERS DISTRIB
JI Divers. Distrib.
PD JAN
PY 2024
VL 30
IS 1
BP 41
EP 54
DI 10.1111/ddi.13787
EA DEC 2023
PG 14
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA GQ2Y3
UT WOS:001112768400001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wübbelmann, T
   Förster, K
   Bouwer, LM
   Dworczyk, C
   Bender, S
   Burkhard, B
AF Wuebbelmann, Thea
   Forster, Kristian
   Bouwer, Laurens M.
   Dworczyk, Claudia
   Bender, Steffen
   Burkhard, Benjamin
TI Urban flood regulating ecosystem services under climate change: how can
   Nature-based Solutions contribute?
SO FRONTIERS IN WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE hydrological modeling; climate adaptation; ecosystem services supply and
   demand; mismatch analysis; scenarios; cities; extreme rainfall
ID HOURLY PRECIPITATION EXTREMES; SUPPLY-AND-DEMAND; RAINFALL INTERCEPTION;
   LAND-USE; TREES; INTENSITY; IMPACT
AB Urban areas are mostly highly sealed spaces, which often leads to large proportions of surface runoff. At the same time, heavy rainfall events are projected to increase in frequency and intensity with anthropogenic climate change. Consequently, higher risks and damages from pluvial flooding are expected. The analysis of Flood Regulating Ecosystem Services (FRES) can help to determine the benefits from nature to people by reducing surface runoff and runoff peaks. However, urban FRES are rarely studied for heavy rainfall events under changing climate conditions. Therefore, we first estimate the functionality of current urban FRES-supply and demand under changing climate conditions. Second, we identify the effects of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) on FRES-supply and demand and their potential future functionality and benefits concerning more intensive rainfall events. A district of the city of Rostock in northeastern Germany serves as the case study area. In addition to the reference conditions based on the current land use, we investigate two potential NbS: (1) increasing the number of trees; and (2) unsealing and soil improvement. Both NbS and a combination of both are applied for three heavy rainfall scenarios. In addition to a reference scenario, two future scenarios were developed to investigate the FRES functionality, based on 21 and 28% more intense rainfall. While the potential FRES-demand was held constant, we assessed the FRES-supply and actual demand for all scenario combinations, using the hydrological model LEAFlood. The comparison between the actual demand and supply indicates the changes in FRES-supply surplus and unmet demand increase. Existing land use structures reached a FRES capacity and cannot buffer more intense rainfall events. Whereas, the NbS serve FRES benefits by increasing the supply and reducing the actual demand. Using FRES indicators, based on hydrological models to estimate future functionality under changing climate conditions and the benefits of NbS, can serve as an analysis and decision-support tool for decision-makers to reduce future urban flood risk.
C1 [Wuebbelmann, Thea; Bouwer, Laurens M.; Bender, Steffen] Helmholtz Zentrum Hereon, Climate Serv Ctr Germany GERICS, Hamburg, Germany.
   [Wuebbelmann, Thea; Dworczyk, Claudia; Burkhard, Benjamin] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Phys Geog & Landscape Ecol, Hannover, Germany.
   [Forster, Kristian] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Hydrol & Water Resource Management, Hannover, Germany.
   [Forster, Kristian] Weihenstephan Triesdorf Univ Appl Sci, Inst Ecol & Landscape, Freising Weihenstephan, Germany.
   [Burkhard, Benjamin] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Muncheberg, Germany.
C3 Helmholtz Association; Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon; Leibniz University
   Hannover; Leibniz University Hannover; Leibniz Association; Leibniz
   Zentrum fur Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF)
RP Wübbelmann, T (corresponding author), Helmholtz Zentrum Hereon, Climate Serv Ctr Germany GERICS, Hamburg, Germany.; Wübbelmann, T (corresponding author), Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Phys Geog & Landscape Ecol, Hannover, Germany.
EM thea.wuebbelmann@hereon.de
RI Förster, Kristian/I-3813-2019; Bouwer, Laurens/AAV-7628-2021; Burkhard,
   Benjamin/ABF-1090-2021; Wübbelmann, Thea/KBC-1731-2024; Bender,
   Steffen/HSB-8852-2023
OI Bender, Dr. Steffen/0000-0003-3198-7293; Forster,
   Kristian/0000-0001-7542-2820; Wubbelmann, Thea/0000-0002-3333-7385;
   Burkhard, Benjamin/0000-0001-8636-9009
FU Helmholtz Association under the Changing Earth research program
FX This work has received support from the Helmholtz Association under the
   Changing Earth research program.
CR Alves PL, 2018, URBAN ECOSYST, V21, P697, DOI 10.1007/s11252-018-0753-y
   [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being, V5
   [Anonymous], 2015, Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities: final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on "Nature based solutions and re naturing cities.", DOI DOI 10.2777/479582
   [Anonymous], 2016, HEC-RAS River Analysis System Users Manual Version 5.0
   Asadian Y, 2009, WATER QUAL RES J CAN, V44, P16, DOI 10.2166/wqrj.2009.003
   Bengtsson L, 2005, NORD HYDROL, V36, P269
   Biota, 2014, INT ENTW KONZ INTEK
   Breuer L, 2003, ECOL MODEL, V169, P237, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00274-6
   Campagne C.Sylvie., 2020, One Ecosystem, V5, DOI DOI 10.3897/ONEECO.5.E51103
   Climate Service Center Germany, 2019, KLIM ROST LANDKR ROS
   Cohen-Shacham E., 2016, Nature-based solutions to address societal challenges, DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.en
   Dahm R, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11020313
   DIN-EN, 2017, 7522017 DINEN
   DWD Climate Data Center, 2020, KOSTRA DWD 2010
   DWD Climate Data Center, 2022, MULT STAT MEANS AIR
   Dworczyk C, 2021, ONE ECOSYSTEM, V6, DOI 10.3897/oneeco.6.e65966
   European Parliament, 2007, RICHTLINIE 200760EG
   Foerster K, 2021, FRONT WATER, V3, DOI 10.3389/frwa.2021.689679
   Förster K, 2020, NPJ CLIM ATMOS SCI, V3, DOI 10.1038/s41612-020-0117-1
   Fritz M, 2017, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_1
   Gaglio M, 2019, ECOL MODEL, V403, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.04.019
   Grunewald K, 2021, ECOSYST SERV, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101273
   Hanse- und Universitatsstadt Rostock-Amt fur Umwelt- und Klimaschutz, 2019, STADTB 2005
   Holsten A, 2009, ECOL MODEL, V220, P2076, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.04.038
   Jackisch N., 2013, EVALUIERUNG REGENWAS
   Jacob D, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P563, DOI 10.1007/s10113-013-0499-2
   Kabisch N, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08373-210239
   Kraft P., 2020, CMF DOCUMENTATION WH
   Kraft P, 2011, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V26, P828, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.12.009
   Lenderink G, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P6037, DOI [10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0808.1, 10.1175/jcli-d-16-0808.1]
   Lenderink G, 2011, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V15, P3033, DOI 10.5194/hess-15-3033-2011
   Lenderink G, 2008, NAT GEOSCI, V1, P511, DOI 10.1038/ngeo262
   Lenderink G, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/085001
   Liu H, 2011, J HYDROL, V396, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.028
   Maes J., 2020, MAPPING ASSESSMENT T
   Manola I, 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V22, P3777, DOI 10.5194/hess-22-3777-2018
   Martín EG, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V794, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148515
   [Masson-Delmotte IPCC. IPCC.], 2021, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, DOI [10.1017/9781009157896.001, DOI 10.1017/9781009157896.001]
   Camarena KSM, 2022, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/hydrology9060108
   Miegel K., 2011, NIEDERSCHLAGSEREIGNI
   MIT Senseable City Lab, EXPL GREEN CAN CIT W
   Mori S, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V129, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107963
   Natural Capital Project, 2020, InVEST vol 3.8.9. Stanford University, University of Minnesota, Chinese Academy of Sciences, The Nature Conservancy, World Wildlife Fund
   Nedkov S, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V21, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022
   Oppenheimer M, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1039
   Rajczak J, 2017, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V122, P10773, DOI 10.1002/2017JD027176
   Rawls W. J., 1993, HDB HYDROLOGY, P5
   Shen J, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107441
   Shen J, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105544
   Smets V, 2019, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V23, P3865, DOI 10.5194/hess-23-3865-2019
   Sponagel H., 2005, Bodenkundliche Kartieranleitung [KA 5]
   Steinbeis-Transferzentrum Geoinformatik, 2017, REALN 2014
   Stovin V, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V131, P206, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.09.026
   Strasser U, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V657, P746, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.077
   Stürck J, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V38, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.010
   TEEB, 2010, OK OK BIOD OK BED NA
   The Guardian, 2019, GUARDIAN
   Westra S, 2014, REV GEOPHYS, V52, P522, DOI 10.1002/2014RG000464
   Wubbelmann T., 2022, LEAFLOOD LANDSCAPE V
   Wubbelmann Thea, 2021, Landscape Online, DOI 10.3097/LO.202188
   Wuebbelmann T, 2022, ONE ECOSYSTEM, V7, DOI 10.3897/oneeco.7.e87458
   Xiong ZH, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11050740
   Yarnvudhi A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132413624
   Zölch T, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V170, P966, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.146
   Zölch T, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V157, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.023
NR 65
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 6
U2 16
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2624-9375
J9 FRONT WATER
JI Front. Water
PD JUN 15
PY 2023
VL 5
AR 1081850
DI 10.3389/frwa.2023.1081850
PG 18
WC Water Resources
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Water Resources
GA K8EP1
UT WOS:001018718000001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Huang, B
   Li, Y
   Liu, Y
   Hu, XP
   Zhao, WW
   Cherubini, F
AF Huang, Bo
   Li, Yan
   Liu, Yi
   Hu, Xiangping
   Zhao, Wenwu
   Cherubini, Francesco
TI A simplified multi-model statistical approach for predicting the effects
   of forest management on land surface temperature in Fennoscandia
SO AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Forest management; Climate change; Surface temperature; Machine learning
ID COVER CHANGE; BACKGROUND CLIMATE; IMPACTS; EUROPE; AFFORESTATION;
   DEFORESTATION; INCREASE; NORWAY; SCALES
AB Forests interact with the local climate through a variety of biophysical mechanisms. Observational and modelling studies have investigated the effects of forested vs. non-forested areas, but the influence of forest management on surface temperature has received far less attention owing to the inherent challenges to adapt climate models to cope with forest dynamics. Further, climate models are complex and highly parameterized, and the time and resource intensity of their use limit applications. The availability of simple yet reliable statistical models based on high resolution maps of forest attributes representative of different development stages can link individual forest management practices to local temperature changes, and ultimately support the design of improved strategies. In this study, we investigate how forest management influences local surface temperature (LSTs) in Fennoscandia through a set of machine learning algorithms. We find that more developed forests are typically associated with higher LST than young or undeveloped forests. The mean multi-model estimates from our statistical system can accurately reproduce the observed LST. Relative to the present state of Fennoscandian forests, fully develop forests are found to induce an annual mean warming of 0.26 degrees C (0.03/0.69 degrees C as 5th/95th percentile), and an average cooling effect in the summer daytime from-0.85 to-0.23 degrees C (depending on the model). On the contrary, a scenario with undeveloped forests induces an annual average cooling of-0.29 degrees C (-0.61/-0.01 degrees C), but daytime warming in the summer that can be higher than 1 degrees C. A weak annual mean cooling of-0.01 degrees C is attributed to forest harvest from 2015 to 2018, with an increased daytime temperature in summer of about 0.04 degrees C. Overall, this approach is a flexible option to study effects of forest management on LST that can be applied at various scales and for alternative management scenarios, thereby helping to improve local management strategies with consideration of effects on local climate.
C1 [Huang, Bo; Hu, Xiangping; Cherubini, Francesco] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, Ind Ecol Programme, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
   [Li, Yan] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Meteorol, Carl Heinrich Becker Weg 6-10, D-12165 Berlin, Germany.
   [Liu, Yi] Det Norske Veritas DNV, EmTech Grp, Grp Res & Dev GRD, Oslo, Norway.
   [Zhao, Wenwu] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China.
C3 Norwegian University of Science & Technology (NTNU); Free University of
   Berlin; Beijing Normal University
RP Huang, B (corresponding author), Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, Ind Ecol Programme, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway.; Li, Y (corresponding author), Free Univ Berlin, Inst Meteorol, Carl Heinrich Becker Weg 6-10, D-12165 Berlin, Germany.
EM bo.huang@ntnu.no; yan.li@met.fu-berlin.de
RI Hu, Xiangping/ABE-8984-2020; Cherubini, Francesco/AFS-6064-2022; zhao,
   wenwu/L-7716-2018; Huang, Bo/B-2605-2016
OI zhao, wenwu/0000-0001-5342-354X; Hu, Xiangping/0000-0003-3468-8248;
   Huang, Bo/0000-0001-6073-432X
FU Norwegian Research Council [286773, 294534]; China Scholarship Council
   (CSC); National Natural Science Foundation of China [41861134038]; State
   Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology
   [2022-ZD-08]; UNINETT Sigma2-the National Infrastructure for High
   Performance Computing and Data Storage in Norway
FX B.H., X.H., and F.C. acknowledge the support of the Norwegian Research
   Council (project no. 286773 and 294534). Y. Li acknowledges the support
   from the China Scholarship Council (CSC) . W.Z. acknowledges support
   from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project no.
   41861134038) and State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and
   Resource Ecology (2022-ZD-08). Simulations were performed on the
   resources provided by UNINETT Sigma2-the National Infrastructure for
   High Performance Computing and Data Storage in Norway.
CR Alkama R, 2016, SCIENCE, V351, P600, DOI 10.1126/science.aac8083
   Amatulli G, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2018.40
   Anderson RG, 2011, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V9, P174, DOI 10.1890/090179
   Armstrong E, 2016, EARTH INTERACT, V20, DOI 10.1175/EI-D-15-0036.1
   Betts RA, 2007, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V142, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.08.021
   Bonan GB, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P1444, DOI 10.1126/science.1155121
   Ceccherini G, 2020, NATURE, V583, P72, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2438-y
   Chang CC, 2011, ACM T INTEL SYST TEC, V2, DOI 10.1145/1961189.1961199
   Cherubini F, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aac794
   Crowther TW, 2015, NATURE, V525, P201, DOI 10.1038/nature14967
   Dai A, 1999, J CLIMATE, V12, P2451, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<2451:EOCSMP>2.0.CO;2
   Davin EL, 2020, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V11, P183, DOI 10.5194/esd-11-183-2020
   de Noblet-Ducoudré N, 2012, J CLIMATE, V25, P3261, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00338.1
   Doan T, 2015, 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING WORKSHOP (ICDMW), P1498, DOI 10.1109/ICDMW.2015.43
   dos Santos T, 2021, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V126, DOI 10.1029/2020JG005999
   ESA, 2017, Land Cover CCI Product User Guide Version 2.0
   Fernández-Delgado M, 2019, NEURAL NETWORKS, V111, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.12.010
   FRIEDMAN JH, 1991, ANN STAT, V19, P1, DOI 10.1214/aos/1176347963
   Gallo K, 2022, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V61, P1485, DOI 10.1175/JAMC-D-21-0240.1
   Ge J, 2019, J CLIMATE, V32, P4445, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0772.1
   Geurts P, 2006, MACH LEARN, V63, P3, DOI 10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1
   Greg Ridgeway, 2024, CRAN
   Hain CR, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P9723, DOI 10.1002/2017GL074952
   Hall DK, 2021, NSIDC, DOI 10.5067/MODIS/MOD10CM.061
   Hanson MA, 2012, SCIENCE, V335, P851, DOI [10.1126/science.1244693, 10.1126/science.1215904]
   Hu XP, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V104, P626, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.05.037
   Huang B, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-14890-0
   Iordan CM, 2018, CARBON BAL MANAGE, V13, DOI 10.1186/s13021-018-0101-9
   Jackson RB, 2008, ENVIRON RES LETT, V3, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/044006
   Kapelner A, 2016, J STAT SOFTW, V70, P1
   Kellomäki S, 2021, FORESTRY, V94, P588, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpab010
   Kolevatova A, 2021, BIG DATA COGN COMPUT, V5, DOI 10.3390/bdcc5040055
   Kotlarski S, 2014, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V7, P1297, DOI 10.5194/gmd-7-1297-2014
   Kuhn M., 2020, CARET CLASSIFICATION
   Kumkar Y, 2020, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V125, DOI 10.1029/2019JD032092
   Kutner H., 2004, APPL LINEAR STAT MOD, P701
   Lawrence DM, 2019, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V11, P4245, DOI 10.1029/2018MS001583
   Lee X, 2011, NATURE, V479, P384, DOI 10.1038/nature10588
   Li Y, 2016, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V7, P167, DOI 10.5194/esd-7-167-2016
   Li Y, 2015, NAT COMMUN, V6, DOI 10.1038/ncomms7603
   Luyssaert S, 2018, NATURE, V562, P259, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0577-1
   Luyssaert S, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P389, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2196, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2196]
   Ma N, 2020, CLIM DYNAM, V55, P2867, DOI 10.1007/s00382-020-05422-z
   Ma W, 2017, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V122, P3806, DOI 10.1002/2016JD026278
   Majasalmi T, 2018, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V15, P399, DOI 10.5194/bg-15-399-2018
   McGrath MJ, 2015, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V12, P4291, DOI 10.5194/bg-12-4291-2015
   Mooney PA, 2021, EARTHS FUTURE, V9, DOI 10.1029/2020EF001838
   Mu QZ, 2011, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V115, P1781, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019
   Mykleby PM, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P2493, DOI 10.1002/2016GL071459
   Naudts K, 2016, SCIENCE, V351, P597, DOI 10.1126/science.aad7270
   Pan YD, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P988, DOI 10.1126/science.1201609
   Peng SS, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P2915, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1315126111
   Peng SS, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014008
   Perugini L, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa6b3f
   Pitman AJ, 2011, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V1, P472, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1294
   Portmann R, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-33279-9
   Quinlan J. R., 1992, Proceedings of the 5th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AI '92, P343
   Quinlan J.R., 1993, MACHINE LEARNING P 1, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-1-55860-307-3.50037-X, 10.1016/b978-1-55860-307-3.50037-x]
   Rodell M, 2004, B AM METEOROL SOC, V85, P381, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-85-3-381
   Rotenberg E, 2010, SCIENCE, V327, P451, DOI 10.1126/science.1179998
   Schultz NM, 2017, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V122, P903, DOI 10.1002/2016JG003653
   Sharma S., 2013, 2013 IEEE INT C COMP, P1, DOI [10.1109/NAPS.2013.6666837, DOI 10.1109/ICCIC.2013.6724149]
   Tang BJ, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10040529
   Tian L., 2022, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V127
   Wan Z., 2015, NASA EOSDIS Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center data set, DOI DOI 10.5067/MODIS/MYD11C3.006
   Wan ZM, 2014, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V140, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.027
   Winckler J, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P3833, DOI 10.1002/2017GL072519
   Yu P, 2022, SCI DATA, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41597-022-01214-8
   Zhang M, 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034002
   Zhang Y, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aab1e7
   Zhou LM, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P17937, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0700290104
   Zhou N, 2021, GEOGR SUSTAIN, V2, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.geosus.2021.07.001
NR 72
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 4
U2 15
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0168-1923
EI 1873-2240
J9 AGR FOREST METEOROL
JI Agric. For. Meteorol.
PD APR 1
PY 2023
VL 332
AR 109362
DI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109362
EA FEB 2023
PG 12
WC Agronomy; Forestry; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Forestry; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA 9S3BF
UT WOS:000946219100001
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU O'Connor, RS
   Le Pogam, A
   Young, KG
   Robitaille, F
   Choy, ES
   Love, OP
   Elliott, KH
   Hargreaves, AL
   Berteaux, D
   Tam, A
   Vézina, F
AF O'Connor, Ryan S.
   Le Pogam, Audrey
   Young, Kevin G.
   Robitaille, Francis
   Choy, Emily S.
   Love, Oliver P.
   Elliott, Kyle H.
   Hargreaves, Anna L.
   Berteaux, Dominique
   Tam, Andrew
   Vezina, Francois
TI Limited heat tolerance in an Arctic passerine: Thermoregulatory
   implications for cold-specialized birds in a rapidly warming world
SO ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Arctic climate change; evaporative cooling efficiency; evaporative water
   loss; heat dissipation; snow bunting; thermal physiology;
   thermoregulatory polygon
ID EVAPORATIVE COOLING CAPACITY; AVIAN THERMOREGULATION; TEMPERATURE
   REGULATION; CLIMATIC ADAPTATION; METABOLISM; HYPERTHERMIA; ENDOTHERMS;
   MORTALITY; PREDATION; RESPONSES
AB 1. Arctic animals inhabit some of the coldest environments on the planet and have evolved physiological mechanisms for minimizing heat loss under extreme cold. However, the Arctic is warming faster than the global average and how well Arctic animals tolerate even moderately high air temperatures (T-a) is unknown.
   2. Using flow-through respirometry, we investigated the heat tolerance and evaporative cooling capacity of snow buntings (Plectrophenax nivalis; approximate to 31 g, N = 42), a cold specialist, Arctic songbird. We exposed buntings to increasing T-a and measured body temperature (T-b), resting metabolic rate (RMR), rates of evaporative water loss (EWL), and evaporative cooling efficiency (the ratio of evaporative heat loss to metabolic heat production).
   3. Buntings had an average (+/- SD) T-b of 41.3 +/- 0.2 degrees C at thermoneutral T-a and increased T-b to a maximum of 43.5 +/- 0.3 degrees C. Buntings started panting at T-a of 33.2 +/- 1.7 degrees C, with rapid increases in EWL starting at T-a = 34.6 degrees C, meaning they experienced heat stress when air temperatures were well below their body temperature. Maximum rates of EWL were only 2.9x baseline rates at thermoneutral T-a, a markedly lower increase than seen in more heat-tolerant arid-zone species (e.g., >= 4.7x baseline rates). Heat-stressed buntings also had low evaporative cooling efficiencies, with 95% of individuals unable to evaporatively dissipate an amount of heat equivalent to their own metabolic heat production.
   4. Our results suggest that buntings' well-developed cold tolerance may come at the cost of reduced heat tolerance. As the Arctic warms, and this and other species experience increased periods of heat stress, a limited capacity for evaporative cooling may force birds to increasingly rely on behavioral thermoregulation, such as minimizing activity, at the expense of diminished performance or reproductive investment.
C1 [O'Connor, Ryan S.; Le Pogam, Audrey; Robitaille, Francis; Berteaux, Dominique; Vezina, Francois] Univ Quebec Rimouski, Dept Biol Chim & Geog, Rimouski, PQ G5L 3A1, Canada.
   [O'Connor, Ryan S.; Le Pogam, Audrey; Berteaux, Dominique; Vezina, Francois] Grp Rech Environm Nord BOREAS, Rimouski, PQ, Canada.
   [O'Connor, Ryan S.; Le Pogam, Audrey; Berteaux, Dominique; Vezina, Francois] Ctr Etud Nord, Rimouski, PQ, Canada.
   [O'Connor, Ryan S.; Le Pogam, Audrey; Berteaux, Dominique; Vezina, Francois] Ctr Sci Biodiversite Quebec, Rimouski, PQ, Canada.
   [Young, Kevin G.] Western Univ, Dept Biol, Adv Facil Avian Res, London, ON, Canada.
   [Choy, Emily S.; Elliott, Kyle H.] McGill Univ, Dept Nat Resource Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada.
   [Love, Oliver P.] Univ Windsor, Dept Integrat Biol, Windsor, ON, Canada.
   [Hargreaves, Anna L.] McGill Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada.
   [Tam, Andrew] 8 Wing Environm, Dept Natl Def, Astra, ON, Canada.
C3 University of Quebec; Universite du Quebec a Rimouski; Western
   University (University of Western Ontario); McGill University;
   University of Windsor; McGill University
RP O'Connor, RS (corresponding author), Univ Quebec Rimouski, Dept Biol Chim & Geog, Rimouski, PQ G5L 3A1, Canada.
EM ryan_oconnor@uqar.ca
RI Choy, Emily/I-7105-2019; Elliott, Kyle/S-9185-2019; Berteaux,
   Dominique/J-3276-2016; Young, Kevin/AAK-3408-2021
OI Choy, Emily/0000-0002-4703-4318; Young, Kevin/0000-0002-9950-7068; Le
   Pogam, Audrey/0000-0003-2765-3135; O'Connor, Ryan/0000-0002-5831-7006
FU FRQNT-Equipe grant; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
   (NSERC) of Canada; Department of National Defence for Canada; Society
   for Experimental Biology and the Company of Biologists
FX We sincerely thank Justine Drolet and Gabrielle Roy for providing
   assistance in the field. This study is part of the Arctic Scope project
   and was supported by a FRQNT-Equipe grant to F.V., K.H.E., A.L.H., and
   O.P.L. Fieldwork at Alert was also supported by Discovery grants and
   Northern Research Supplements from the Natural Sciences and Engineering
   Research Council (NSERC) of Canada to F.V. and O.P.L and by logistical
   and funding support by the Department of National Defence for Canada to
   F.V. and D.B. A travel award to R.S.O was generously provided by the
   Society for Experimental Biology and the Company of Biologists. All bird
   handling was approved by the animal care committee of the Universite du
   Quebec a Rimouski (CPA-71-17-194) and was conducted under scientific
   (NUN-SCI-15-05) and banding (10889) permits from Environment and Climate
   Change Canada.
CR Albright TP, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P2283, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1613625114
   Angilletta Michael J Jr, 2010, Front Biosci (Elite Ed), V2, P861
   [Anonymous], 2010, Biostatistical design and analysis using R: a practical guide
   BAKKEN GS, 1976, J THEOR BIOL, V60, P337, DOI 10.1016/0022-5193(76)90063-1
   BARTHOLOMEW GEORGE A., 1962, CONDOR, V64, P117, DOI 10.2307/1365480
   Barton K, 2019, MUMIN MULTIMODEL INF
   Bates D, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V67, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Boyles JG, 2011, INTEGR COMP BIOL, V51, P676, DOI 10.1093/icb/icr053
   Burnham KP, 2011, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V65, P23, DOI 10.1007/s00265-010-1029-6
   CAFF (Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna), 2013, ARCTIC BIODIVERSITY
   Conradie SR, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P14065, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1821312116
   Cooper SJ, 2004, CONDOR, V106, P852, DOI 10.1650/7588
   Cunningham SJ, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0074613
   Czenze ZJ, 2020, FUNCT ECOL, V34, P1589, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13573
   du Plessis KL, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P3063, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02778.x
   Gardner JL, 2016, ECOLOGY, V97, P786, DOI 10.1890/15-0642.1
   Gaston AJ, 2002, IBIS, V144, P185, DOI 10.1046/j.1474-919X.2002.00038.x
   Gaston AJ, 2013, ARCTIC, V66, P43
   Gerson AR, 2019, FUNCT ECOL, V33, P597, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13274
   Gilg O, 2016, BIOL LETTERS, V12, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0277
   Grueber CE, 2011, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V24, P699, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02210.x
   HAYWORTH AM, 1984, CONDOR, V86, P19, DOI 10.2307/1367336
   HUDSON JW, 1966, COMP BIOCHEM PHYSIOL, V17, P203, DOI 10.1016/0010-406X(66)90021-1
   Jetz W, 2008, PLOS ONE, V3, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003261
   Karasov W.H., 1990, STUD AVIAN BIOL, V13, P391
   Koller M, 2016, J STAT SOFTW, V75, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v075.i06
   LASIEWSKI RC, 1966, COMP BIOCHEM PHYSIOL, V19, P445, DOI 10.1016/0010-406X(66)90153-8
   Ldecke D., 2018, J Open Source Softw, V3, P772, DOI [DOI 10.21105/JOSS.00772, 10.21105/joss.00772]
   Le Pogam A, 2020, PHYSIOL BIOCHEM ZOOL, V93, P417, DOI 10.1086/711370
   Lighton JRB, 2019, MEASURING METABOLIC RATES: A MANUAL FOR SCIENTISTS, 2ND EDITION, DOI 10.1093/oso/9780198830399.001.0001
   Londoño GA, 2015, FUNCT ECOL, V29, P338, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12348
   McKechnie AE, 2019, PHYSIOLOGY, V34, P302, DOI 10.1152/physiol.00011.2019
   McKechnie AE, 2017, J EXP BIOL, V220, P2436, DOI 10.1242/jeb.155507
   McKechnie AE, 2012, EMU, V112, pI, DOI 10.1071/MUv112n2_ED
   McKechnie AE, 2010, BIOL LETTERS, V6, P253, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0702
   Meltofte H., 1983, Polar Research, V1, P185
   Milne R, 2015, CONSERV PHYSIOL, V3, DOI 10.1093/conphys/cov048
   Moe B, 2009, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V393, P235, DOI 10.3354/meps08222
   Nieuwenhuis R, 2012, R J, V4, P38
   Nilsson JÅ, 2018, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V285, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2018.0652
   Noakes MJ, 2016, J EXP BIOL, V219, P859, DOI 10.1242/jeb.132001
   Nord A, 2019, FUNCT ECOL, V33, P250, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13243
   Nord A, 2016, J AVIAN BIOL, V47, P417, DOI 10.1111/jav.00845
   Oswald KN, 2019, ANIM BEHAV, V157, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.09.006
   Oswald KN, 2018, J ORNITHOL, V159, P1063, DOI 10.1007/s10336-018-1582-8
   Overland J.E., 2019, Arctic Report Card 2019
   PRINZINGER R, 1991, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS A, V99, P499, DOI 10.1016/0300-9629(91)90122-S
   R Core Team, 2020, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
   Rezende EL, 2015, J COMP PHYSIOL B, V185, P709, DOI 10.1007/s00360-015-0909-5
   Riddell EA, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P21609, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1908791116
   SCHOLANDER PF, 1950, BIOL BULL-US, V99, P237, DOI 10.2307/1538741
   Silva JP, 2015, ECOSPHERE, V6, DOI 10.1890/ES14-00454.1
   Smith EK, 2017, J EXP BIOL, V220, P3290, DOI 10.1242/jeb.161141
   Smith PA, 2010, POLAR BIOL, V33, P1149, DOI 10.1007/s00300-010-0791-2
   Snell KRS, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0202114
   Sonderegger D., 2020, SIZER SIGNIFICANT ZE
   Tapper S, 2020, J EXP BIOL, V223, DOI 10.1242/jeb.222232
   Tieleman BI, 1999, PHYSIOL BIOCHEM ZOOL, V72, P87, DOI 10.1086/316640
   Tieleman BI, 2000, PHYSIOL BIOCHEM ZOOL, V73, P461, DOI 10.1086/317740
   Tieleman BI, 2002, PHYSIOL BIOCHEM ZOOL, V75, P305, DOI 10.1086/341998
   van de Ven TMFN, 2019, OECOLOGIA, V191, P205, DOI 10.1007/s00442-019-04486-x
   WEATHERS WW, 1982, AUK, V99, P667
   WEATHERS WW, 1981, PHYSIOL ZOOL, V54, P345, DOI 10.1086/physzool.54.3.30159949
   WEATHERS WW, 1979, OECOLOGIA, V42, P81, DOI 10.1007/BF00347620
   White CR, 2007, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V274, P287, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2006.3727
   Whitfield MC, 2015, J EXP BIOL, V218, P1705, DOI 10.1242/jeb.121749
   Wickham H., 2009, ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, DOI [10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3, 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4]
   Zhang X., 2019, Canada's changing climate report, P112
NR 68
TC 20
Z9 22
U1 3
U2 27
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 2045-7758
J9 ECOL EVOL
JI Ecol. Evol.
PD FEB
PY 2021
VL 11
IS 4
BP 1609
EP 1619
DI 10.1002/ece3.7141
EA JAN 2021
PG 11
WC Ecology; Evolutionary Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Evolutionary Biology
GA QG9IV
UT WOS:000608070600001
PM 33613993
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Iturbide, M
   Gutiérrez, JM
   Alves, LM
   Bedia, J
   Cerezo-Mota, R
   Cimadevilla, E
   Cofiño, AS
   Di Luca, A
   Faria, SH
   Gorodetskaya, IV
   Hauser, M
   Herrera, S
   Hennessy, K
   Hewitt, HT
   Jones, RG
   Krakovska, S
   Manzanas, R
   Martínez-Castro, D
   Narisma, GT
   Nurhati, IS
   Pinto, I
   Seneviratne, SI
   van den Hurk, B
   Vera, CS
AF Iturbide, Maialen
   Gutierrez, Jose M.
   Alves, Lincoln M.
   Bedia, Joaquin
   Cerezo-Mota, Ruth
   Cimadevilla, Ezequiel
   Cofino, Antonio S.
   Di Luca, Alejandro
   Henrique Faria, Sergio
   Gorodetskaya, Irina V.
   Hauser, Mathias
   Herrera, Sixto
   Hennessy, Kevin
   Hewitt, Helene T.
   Jones, Richard G.
   Krakovska, Svitlana
   Manzanas, Rodrigo
   Martinez-Castro, Daniel
   Narisma, Gemma T.
   Nurhati, Intan S.
   Pinto, Izidine
   Seneviratne, Sonia I.
   van den Hurk, Bart
   Vera, Carolina S.
TI An update of IPCC climate reference regions for subcontinental analysis
   of climate model data: definition and aggregated datasets
SO EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE DATA
LA English
DT Article; Data Paper
AB Several sets of reference regions have been used in the literature for the regional synthesis of observed and modelled climate and climate change information. A popular example is the series of reference regions used in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Adaptation (SREX). The SREX regions were slightly modified for the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC and used for reporting subcontinental observed and projected changes over a reduced number (33) of climatologically consistent regions encompassing a representative number of grid boxes. These regions are intended to allow analysis of atmospheric data over broad land or ocean regions and have been used as the basis for several popular spatially aggregated datasets, such as the Seasonal Mean Temperature and Precipitation in IPCC Regions for CMIP5 dataset.
   We present an updated version of the reference regions for the analysis of new observed and simulated datasets (including CMIP6) which offer an opportunity for refinement due to the higher atmospheric model resolution. As a result, the number of land and ocean regions is increased to 46 and 15, respectively, better representing consistent regional climate features. The paper describes the rationale for the definition of the new regions and analyses their homogeneity. The regions are defined as polygons and are provided as coordinates and a shapefile together with companion R and Python notebooks to illustrate their use in practical problems (e.g. calculating regional averages). We also describe the generation of a new dataset with monthly temperature and precipitation, spatially aggregated in the new regions, currently for CMIP5 and CMIP6, to be extended to other datasets in the future (including observations). The use of these reference regions, dataset and code is illustrated through a worked example using scatter plots to offer guidance on the likely range of future climate change at the scale of the reference regions. The regions, datasets and code (R and Python notebooks) are freely available at the ATLAS GitHub repository: https://github.com/SantanderMetGroup/ATLAS (last access: 24 August 2020), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3998463 (Iturbide et al., 2020).
C1 [Iturbide, Maialen; Gutierrez, Jose M.] UC, CSIC, Inst Fis Cantabria, Grp Meteorol, Santander, Spain.
   [Alves, Lincoln M.] Natl Inst Space Res, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil.
   [Bedia, Joaquin; Cimadevilla, Ezequiel; Cofino, Antonio S.; Herrera, Sixto; Manzanas, Rodrigo] Univ Cantabria, Dept Matemat Aplicada & Ciencias Computac, Grp Meteorol, Santander, Spain.
   [Cerezo-Mota, Ruth] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ingn, Mexico City, DF, Mexico.
   [Di Luca, Alejandro] Univ New South Wales, Climate Change Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
   [Di Luca, Alejandro] Univ New South Wales, ARC Ctr Excellence Climate Extremes, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
   [Henrique Faria, Sergio] Basque Ctr Climate Change BC3, Leioa, Spain.
   [Henrique Faria, Sergio] Basque Fdn Sci, IKERBASQUE, Bilbao, Spain.
   [Gorodetskaya, Irina V.] Univ Aveiro, Dept Phys, CESAM Ctr Environm & Marine Studies, Aveiro, Portugal.
   [Hauser, Mathias; Seneviratne, Sonia I.] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Atmospher & Climate Sci, Zurich, Switzerland.
   [Hennessy, Kevin] CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
   [Hewitt, Helene T.; Jones, Richard G.] Met Off Hadley Ctr, Exeter, Devon, England.
   [Jones, Richard G.] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, Oxford, England.
   [Krakovska, Svitlana] Ukrainian Hydrometeorol Inst, Kiev, Ukraine.
   [Krakovska, Svitlana] State Inst Natl Antarctic Sci Ctr, Kiev, Ukraine.
   [Manzanas, Rodrigo] Univ Paris Saclay, WGI TSU, Intergovt Panel Climate Change, Paris, France.
   [Martinez-Castro, Daniel] Inst Meteorol Cuba, Havana, Cuba.
   [Martinez-Castro, Daniel] Inst Geofis Peru, Lima, Peru.
   [Narisma, Gemma T.] Manila Observ, Ateneo de Manila Univ Campus, Quezon City, Philippines.
   [Nurhati, Intan S.] Indonesian Inst Sci, Res Ctr Oceanog, Jakarta, Indonesia.
   [Pinto, Izidine] Univ Cape Town, Climate Syst Anal Grp, Cape Town, South Africa.
   [van den Hurk, Bart] Deltares, Delft, Netherlands.
   [Vera, Carolina S.] Univ Buenos Aires, Dept Ciencias Atmosfera & Oceanos, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina.
   [Vera, Carolina S.] UBA, CONICET, Ctr Invest Mar & Atmosfera, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina.
   [Vera, Carolina S.] UBA, CONICET, Inst Franco Argentino Estudios Clima & Sus Impact, CNRS, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina.
C3 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC); Universidad de
   Cantabria; CSIC - Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria (IFCA); Instituto
   Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE); Universidad de Cantabria;
   Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico; University of New South Wales
   Sydney; University of New South Wales Sydney; Basque Centre for Climate
   Change (BC3); Basque Foundation for Science; Universidade de Aveiro;
   Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology Domain; ETH Zurich; Commonwealth
   Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO); Met Office - UK;
   Hadley Centre; University of Oxford; National Academy of Sciences
   Ukraine; Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute of the State Emergency
   Service of Ukraine & National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine; Ministry
   of Education & Science of Ukraine; State Institution National Antarctic
   Scientific Center; Universite Paris Saclay; Ateneo de Manila University;
   National Research & Innovation Agency of Indonesia (BRIN); Indonesian
   Institute of Sciences (LIPI); University of Cape Town; Deltares;
   University of Buenos Aires; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones
   Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET); University of Buenos Aires; Consejo
   Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET); University
   of Buenos Aires
RP Gutiérrez, JM (corresponding author), UC, CSIC, Inst Fis Cantabria, Grp Meteorol, Santander, Spain.
EM gutierjm@ifca.unican.es
RI Manzanas, R./A-7747-2013; Herrera García, Sixto/GNP-0189-2022;
   Seneviratne, Sonia/G-8761-2011; Gorodetskaya, Irina/K-1987-2015;
   Krakovska, Svitlana/AAB-8794-2020; Gutiérrez, José/C-5754-2009;
   Iturbide, Maialen/P-9101-2017; Faria, Sérgio/K-9454-2013; Di Luca,
   Alejandro/Y-4908-2019; Nurhati, Intan/M-1216-2019; van den Hurk,
   Bart/ABI-1654-2020; Hauser, Mathias/AAB-3396-2020; Bedia,
   Joaquin/Q-2148-2015; Alves, Lincoln/G-8894-2015; Pinto,
   Izidine/AAF-5999-2020; Herrera Garcia, Sixto/A-2573-2015
OI Cimadevilla Alvarez, Ezequiel/0000-0002-8437-2068; Pinto,
   Izidine/0000-0002-9919-4559; Herrera Garcia, Sixto/0000-0002-5384-179X
FU Spanish National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and
   Innovation [PID2019-111481RB-I00]; Spanish National Plan for Scientific
   and Technical Research and Innovation (Maria de Maeztu excellence
   programme projects) [MdM-2017-0765, MdM-2017-0714]; FCT MCTES
   [UIDP/50017/2020 CUIDB/50017/2020]; Basque Government BERC 2018-2021
   programme
FX This research has been supported by the Spanish National Plan for
   Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation (project
   PID2019-111481RB-I00 and Maria de Maeztu excellence programme projects
   MdM-2017-0765 and MdM-2017-0714), FCT MCTES financial support to CESAM
   (UIDP/50017/2020 CUIDB/50017/2020), and the Basque Government BERC
   2018-2021 programme.
CR [Anonymous], 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P727, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0599-1
   [Anonymous], 2015, TECHNICAL REPORT
   Balaji V, 2018, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V11, P3659, DOI 10.5194/gmd-11-3659-2018
   Bärring L, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa9f72
   CDO, 2019, CDO CLIM DAT OP VERS
   Christensen JH, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P847
   Diedhiou A, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aac3e5
   Durack PJ, 2010, J CLIMATE, V23, P4342, DOI 10.1175/2010JCLI3377.1
   Espinoza JC, 2019, CLIM DYNAM, V52, P5413, DOI 10.1007/s00382-018-4462-2
   Forster PM, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P7, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0660-0
   Giorgi F, 2000, CLIM DYNAM, V16, P169, DOI 10.1007/PL00013733
   Giorgi F, 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001: THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS, P583
   Harris I, 2014, INT J CLIMATOL, V34, P623, DOI 10.1002/joc.3711
   Harris I., 2020, CRU TS4 03 CLIMATIC, DOI 10.5285/10d3e3640f004c578403419aac167d82
   Hauser M., REGIONMASK PLOTTING
   Hawkins E, 2009, B AM METEOROL SOC, V90, P1095, DOI 10.1175/2009BAMS2607.1
   Hoyer S., 2017, Journal of Open Research Software, V5, P10, DOI [10.5334/jors.148, DOI 10.5334/JORS.148]
   Huffman GJ, 2009, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V36, DOI 10.1029/2009GL040000
   Iturbide M, 2019, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V111, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.09.009
   Kotlarski S, 2019, INT J CLIMATOL, V39, P3730, DOI 10.1002/joc.5249
   Madakumbura GD, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-39936-2
   Maúre G, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aab190
   McSweeney CF, 2015, CLIM DYNAM, V44, P3237, DOI 10.1007/s00382-014-2418-8
   O'Neill BC, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P3461, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016
   Osima S, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaba1b
   Ruane A.C., 2017, EARTH PERSPECTIVES, V4, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1186/S40322-017-0036-4, 10.1186/s40322-017-0036-4]
   Rubel F, 2010, METEOROL Z, V19, P135, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2010/0430
   Schneider U., 2015, GPCC full data reanalysis: Monthly land-surface precipitation from rain gauges built on GTS based and historic data, DOI [DOI 10.5676/DWDGPCC/FDMV7050, DOI 10.5676/DWD_GPCC/FD_M_V7_050, 10.5676/DWD_GPCC/FD_M_V6_050, DOI 10.5676/DWD_GPCC/FD_M_V6_050]
   Seneviratne SI, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, P109
   Taylor KE, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P485, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
   van Oldenborgh GJ, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1311
   WMO, 2017, WMO GUID CALC CLIM N
NR 32
TC 292
Z9 295
U1 12
U2 99
PU COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
PI GOTTINGEN
PA BAHNHOFSALLEE 1E, GOTTINGEN, 37081, GERMANY
SN 1866-3508
EI 1866-3516
J9 EARTH SYST SCI DATA
JI Earth Syst. Sci. Data
PD NOV 18
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 4
BP 2959
EP 2970
DI 10.5194/essd-12-2959-2020
PG 12
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA OW4KG
UT WOS:000592857100003
OA Green Published, gold
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU LeMoine, MT
   Eby, LA
   Clancy, CG
   Nyce, LG
   Jakober, MJ
   Isaak, DJ
AF LeMoine, Michael T.
   Eby, Lisa A.
   Clancy, Chris G.
   Nyce, Leslie G.
   Jakober, Michael J.
   Isaak, Dan J.
TI Landscape resistance mediates native fish species distribution shifts
   and vulnerability to climate change in riverscapes
SO GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE barriers; climate change; fish; mobility; stream warming; temperature
ID WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT; FRESH-WATER BIODIVERSITY; BULL TROUT; STREAM
   TEMPERATURES; RIVER-BASIN; WESTERN US; HABITAT; CONSERVATION;
   POPULATIONS; WILDFIRE
AB A broader understanding of how landscape resistance influences climate change vulnerability for many species is needed, as is an understanding of how barriers to dispersal may impact vulnerability. Freshwater biodiversity is at particular risk, but previous studies have focused on popular cold-water fishes (e.g., salmon, trout, and char) with relatively large body sizes and mobility. Those fishes may be able to track habitat change more adeptly than less mobile species. Smaller, less mobile fishes are rarely represented in studies demonstrating effects of climate change, but depending on their thermal tolerance, they may be particularly vulnerable to environmental change. By revisiting 280 sites over a 20 year interval throughout a warming riverscape, we described changes in occupancy (i.e., site extirpation and colonization probabilities) and assessed the environmental conditions associated with those changes for four fishes spanning a range of body sizes, thermal and habitat preferences. Two larger-bodied trout species exhibited small changes in site occupancy, with bull trout experiencing a 9.2% (95% CI = 8.3%-10.1%) reduction, mostly in warmer stream reaches, and westslope cutthroat trout experiencing a nonsignificant 1% increase. The small-bodied cool water slimy sculpin was originally distributed broadly throughout the network and experienced a 48.0% (95% CI = 42.0%-54.0%) reduction in site occupancy with declines common in warmer stream reaches and areas subject to wildfire disturbances. The small-bodied comparatively warmer water longnose dace primarily occupied larger streams and increased its occurrence in the lower portions of connected tributaries during the study period. Distribution shifts for sculpin and dace were significantly constrained by barriers, which included anthropogenic water diversions, natural step-pools and cascades in steeper upstream reaches. Our results suggest that aquatic communities exhibit a range of responses to climate change, and that improving passage and fluvial connectivity will be important climate adaptation tactics for conserving aquatic biodiversity.
C1 [LeMoine, Michael T.; Eby, Lisa A.] Univ Montana, Wildlife Biol Program, Missoula, MT 59812 USA.
   [LeMoine, Michael T.] Skagit River Syst Cooperat, POB 368, La Conner, WA 98257 USA.
   [Clancy, Chris G.; Nyce, Leslie G.] Montana Fish Wildlife & Pk, Hamilton, MT USA.
   [Jakober, Michael J.] Bitterroot Natl Forest, Hamilton, MT USA.
   [Isaak, Dan J.] US Forest Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, USDA, Boise, ID USA.
C3 University of Montana System; University of Montana; United States
   Department of Agriculture (USDA); United States Forest Service
RP LeMoine, MT (corresponding author), Skagit River Syst Cooperat, POB 368, La Conner, WA 98257 USA.
EM mlemoine@skagitcoop.org
RI Isaak, Dan/C-8818-2011
FU USGS Montana Water Center; Univeristy of Montana; USDA McIntire Stennis
   [MONZ17004]
FX USGS Montana Water Center; Univeristy of Montana; USDA McIntire Stennis,
   Grant/Award Number: MONZ17004
CR Adams SB, 2007, T AM FISH SOC, V136, P1736, DOI 10.1577/T07-023.1
   Adams SB, 2015, COPEIA, V103, P416, DOI 10.1643/CE-14-229
   Al-Chokhachy R, 2016, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V73, P1395, DOI 10.1139/cjfas-2015-0293
   Albanese B, 2009, FRESHWATER BIOL, V54, P1444, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02194.x
   Alofs KM, 2014, DIVERS DISTRIB, V20, P123, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12130
   Altermatt F, 2013, AQUAT ECOL, V47, P365, DOI 10.1007/s10452-013-9450-3
   Angert AL, 2011, ECOL LETT, V14, P677, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01620.x
   [Anonymous], 2014, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
   Arnold CL, 1996, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V62, P243, DOI 10.1080/01944369608975688
   Arnold TW, 2010, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V74, P1175, DOI 10.2193/2009-367
   Bálint M, 2011, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V1, P313, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1191
   BALTZ DM, 1982, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V39, P1502, DOI 10.1139/f82-202
   Bear EA, 2007, T AM FISH SOC, V136, P1113, DOI 10.1577/T06-072.1
   Behlke C.E., 1991, Fundamentals of culvert design for fish passage of weak-swimming fish
   Bell M., 1981, DACW6P76C0254 US ARM, P1
   Birnie-Gauvin K, 2019, AQUAT CONSERV, V29, P1095, DOI 10.1002/aqc.2946
   Bixby RJ, 2015, FRESHW SCI, V34, P1340, DOI 10.1086/684073
   Boyer MC, 2008, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V65, P658, DOI 10.1139/F08-001
   Britton JR, 2011, FISH FISH, V12, P256, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00390.x
   Buisson L, 2008, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V14, P2232, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01657.x
   Burnham K. P., 2002, Model selection and inference: a practical informationtheoretic approach, VSecond edition
   Burton TA, 2005, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V211, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.063
   Carroll C, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P5318, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14373
   Chen IC, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P1024, DOI 10.1126/science.1206432
   Comte L, 2014, NAT COMMUN, V5, DOI 10.1038/ncomms6053
   Comte L, 2013, ECOGRAPHY, V36, P1236, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00282.x
   Comte L, 2013, FRESHWATER BIOL, V58, P625, DOI 10.1111/fwb.12081
   Deiner K, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, P1, DOI 10.1038/ncomms12544
   Dormann CF, 2013, ECOGRAPHY, V36, P27, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
   Dudgeon D, 2006, BIOL REV, V81, P163, DOI 10.1017/S1464793105006950
   Eby LA, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0098812
   Fausch KD, 2009, CONSERV BIOL, V23, P859, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01159.x
   Ficke A. D., 2015, THESIS
   Ficke AD, 2009, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V29, P1444, DOI 10.1577/M08-248.1
   Fielding AH, 1997, ENVIRON CONSERV, V24, P38, DOI 10.1017/S0376892997000088
   Foden WB, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0065427
   FRALEY JJ, 1989, NORTHWEST SCI, V63, P133
   Gibson-Reinemer DK, 2017, DIVERS DISTRIB, V23, P761, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12576
   Grinnell J., 1924, P752
   Haidvogl G, 2014, ECOL FRESHW FISH, V23, P498, DOI 10.1111/eff.12103
   Hamlet AF, 2007, J CLIMATE, V20, P1468, DOI 10.1175/JCLI4051.1
   Hari RE, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P10, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001051.x
   HARRELL FE, 1984, STAT MED, V3, P143, DOI 10.1002/sim.4780030207
   HAWKINS CP, 1993, FISHERIES, V18, P3, DOI 10.1577/1548-8446(1993)018<0003:AHATCS>2.0.CO;2
   Heino J, 2009, BIOL REV, V84, P39, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00060.x
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   Holsinger L, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V124, P191, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1092-5
   Howell PJ, 2010, ECOL FRESHW FISH, V19, P96, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2009.00393.x
   Isaak DJ, 2018, T AM FISH SOC, V147, P566, DOI 10.1002/tafs.10059
   Isaak DJ, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P9181, DOI 10.1002/2017WR020969
   Isaak DJ, 2017, ECOL APPL, V27, P977, DOI 10.1002/eap.1501
   Isaak DJ, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P4374, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1522429113
   Isaak DJ, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P2540, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12879
   Isaak DJ, 2010, ECOL APPL, V20, P1350, DOI 10.1890/09-0822.1
   Januchowski-Hartley SR, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V232, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.040
   Justice C, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V188, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.005
   Kalinkat G, 2017, CONSERV BIOL, V31, P481, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12813
   Kendall WL, 2013, ECOLOGY, V94, P610, DOI 10.1890/12-1720.1
   Lemoine M, 2014, ZOOTAXA, V3755, P241, DOI 10.11646/zootaxa.3755.3.3
   LeMoine MT, 2014, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V71, P1758, DOI 10.1139/cjfas-2014-0029
   Lenoir J, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P1768, DOI 10.1126/science.1156831
   Leppi JC, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V112, P997, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0235-1
   Littell J.S., 2011, Regional climate and hydrologic change in the Northern U.S. Rockies and Pacific Northwest: internally consistent projections of future climate for resource management
   Luce CH, 2009, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V36, DOI 10.1029/2009GL039407
   Lynch AJ, 2016, FISHERIES, V41, P346, DOI 10.1080/03632415.2016.1186016
   Lyons J, 2009, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V29, P1130, DOI 10.1577/M08-118.1
   MacKenzie DI, 2003, ECOLOGY, V84, P2200, DOI 10.1890/02-3090
   MacLean SA, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P4094, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13736
   Mahlum SK, 2011, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V20, P240, DOI 10.1071/WF09132
   Mawdsley JR, 2009, CONSERV BIOL, V23, P1080, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01264.x
   McGuire JL, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P7195, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1602817113
   Meronek Thomas G., 1996, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, V16, P63, DOI 10.1577/1548-8675(1996)016<0063:AROFCP>2.3.CO;2
   Messager ML, 2018, DIVERS DISTRIB, V24, P1816, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12829
   Meyer KA, 2003, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V23, P149, DOI 10.1577/1548-8675(2003)023<0149:ALTCOY>2.0.CO;2
   Millar CI, 2004, ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES, V36, P181, DOI 10.1657/1523-0430(2004)036[0181:ROSCIT]2.0.CO;2
   Morgan P, 2001, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V10, P329, DOI 10.1071/WF01032
   Moritz C, 2008, SCIENCE, V322, P261, DOI 10.1126/science.1163428
   Mote PW, 2018, NPJ CLIM ATMOS SCI, V1, DOI 10.1038/s41612-018-0012-1
   Muhlfeld CC, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P620, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2252, 10.1038/nclimate2252]
   Nislow KH, 2011, FRESHWATER BIOL, V56, P2135, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02634.x
   Nyboer EA, 2019, BIOL CONSERV, V236, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.003
   Nyce LG, 2013, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V33, P432, DOI 10.1080/02755947.2013.768565
   Pacifici M, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P215, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2448
   Pandit SN, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V598, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.228
   Parmesan C, 2003, NATURE, V421, P37, DOI 10.1038/nature01286
   Parmesan C, 1999, NATURE, V399, P579, DOI 10.1038/21181
   Parmesan C, 2006, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V37, P637, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
   Pederson GT, 2010, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V98, P133, DOI 10.1007/s10584-009-9642-y
   Popescu VD, 2012, ECOL APPL, V22, P1389, DOI 10.1890/11-1669.1
   Potter KA, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P2932, DOI [10.1111/gcb.12257, 10.1111/]
   Radinger J, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V208, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.011
   Radinger J, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P4970, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13760
   RAHEL FJ, 1991, T AM FISH SOC, V120, P319, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1991)120<0319:FAAHGI>2.3.CO;2
   Rahel FJ, 2018, ECOL APPL, V28, P2066, DOI 10.1002/eap.1795
   Reiser D., 1995, S SMALL HYDR FISH, P423
   Rhoades CC, 2011, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V20, P430, DOI 10.1071/WF09086
   RIEMAN BE, 1995, T AM FISH SOC, V124, P285, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1995)124<0285:OOBTIN>2.3.CO;2
   Rieman BE, 2007, T AM FISH SOC, V136, P1552, DOI 10.1577/T07-028.1
   Royle JA, 2007, ECOLOGY, V88, P1813, DOI 10.1890/06-0669.1
   Rubenson ES, 2020, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V77, P314, DOI 10.1139/cjfas-2018-0357
   Sala OE, 2000, SCIENCE, V287, P1770, DOI 10.1126/science.287.5459.1770
   Schloss CA, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P8606, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1116791109
   Schmetterling DA, 2004, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V24, P1163, DOI 10.1577/M03-025.1
   Selong JH, 2001, T AM FISH SOC, V130, P1026, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(2001)130<1026:EOTOGA>2.0.CO;2
   Shepard Bradley B., 1997, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, V17, P1158, DOI 10.1577/1548-8675(1997)017<1158:SAROEF>2.3.CO;2
   Stewart IT, 2009, HYDROL PROCESS, V23, P78, DOI 10.1002/hyp.7128
   Thomas CD, 2004, NATURE, V427, P145, DOI 10.1038/nature02121
   Thuiller W, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P8245, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0409902102
   Tingley MW, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P3279, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02784.x
   Tittensor DP, 2010, NATURE, V466, P1098, DOI 10.1038/nature09329
   Utzinger J, 1998, J APPL ECOL, V35, P882, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.1998.tb00006.x
   Valtonen A, 2017, J ANIM ECOL, V86, P730, DOI 10.1111/1365-2656.12687
   Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), 2009, FISH PASS BARR SURF
   Wenger SJ, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P14175, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1103097108
   Westerling AL, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P940, DOI 10.1126/science.1128834
   White GC, 1999, BIRD STUDY, V46, P120, DOI 10.1080/00063659909477239
   Wilcox TM, 2018, ECOSPHERE, V9, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2500
   Williams JE, 2009, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V29, P533, DOI 10.1577/M08-072.1
   Wohl E, 2017, ANTHROPOCENE, V18, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.ancene.2017.05.004
   Young MK, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0163563
   Young MK, 2013, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V13, P583, DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12091
   Zeller KA, 2012, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V27, P777, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9737-0
   ZWICK P, 1992, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V1, P80, DOI 10.1007/BF00731036
NR 123
TC 31
Z9 36
U1 2
U2 35
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1354-1013
EI 1365-2486
J9 GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL
JI Glob. Change Biol.
PD OCT
PY 2020
VL 26
IS 10
BP 5492
EP 5508
DI 10.1111/gcb.15281
EA AUG 2020
PG 17
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA NR8TO
UT WOS:000560894000001
PM 32677074
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Griffin, PC
   Hangartner, SB
   Fournier-Level, A
   Hoffmann, AA
AF Griffin, Philippa C.
   Hangartner, Sandra B.
   Fournier-Level, Alexandre
   Hoffmann, Ary A.
TI Genomic Trajectories to Desiccation Resistance: Convergence and
   Divergence Among Replicate Selected <i>Drosophila Lines</i>
SO GENETICS
LA English
DT Article
DE Pool-Seq; climate adaptation; experimental evolution; natural variation;
   population genomics
ID STRESS RESISTANCE; GENETIC-VARIATION; MELANOGASTER POPULATIONS;
   EXPERIMENTAL EVOLUTION; CORRELATED RESPONSES; RELATIVE IMPORTANCE;
   NATURAL-POPULATION; ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION; UNIFORM SELECTION;
   CLIMATE-CHANGE
AB Adaptation to environmental stress is critical for long-term species persistence. With climate change and other anthropogenic stressors compounding natural selective pressures, understanding the nature of adaptation is as important as ever in evolutionary biology. In particular, the number of alternative molecular trajectories available for an organism to reach the same adaptive phenotype remains poorly understood. Here, we investigate this issue in a set of replicated Drosophila melanogaster lines selected for increased desiccation resistance-a classical physiological trait that has been closely linked to Drosophila species distributions. We used pooled whole-genome sequencing (Pool-Seq) to compare the genetic basis of their selection responses, using a matching set of replicated control lines for characterizing laboratory (lab-) adaptation, as well as the original base population. The ratio of effective population size to census size was high over the 21 generations of the experiment at 0.52-0.88 for all selected and control lines. While selected SNPs in replicates of the same treatment (desiccation-selection or lab-adaptation) tended to change frequency in the same direction, suggesting some commonality in the selection response, candidate SNP and gene lists often differed among replicates. Three of the five desiccation-selection replicates showed significant overlap at the gene and network level. All five replicates showed enrichment for ovary-expressed genes, suggesting maternal effects on the selected trait. Divergence between pairs of replicate lines for desiccation-candidate SNPs was greater than between pairs of control lines. This difference also far exceeded the divergence between pairs of replicate lines for neutral SNPs. Overall, while there was overlap in the direction of allele frequency changes and the network and functional categories affected by desiccation selection, replicates showed unique responses at all levels, likely reflecting hitchhiking effects, and highlighting the challenges in identifying candidate genes from these types of experiments when traits are likely to be polygenic.
C1 [Griffin, Philippa C.; Hangartner, Sandra B.; Fournier-Level, Alexandre; Hoffmann, Ary A.] Univ Melbourne, Inst Bio21, Sch Biosci, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia.
   [Hangartner, Sandra B.] Monash Univ, Sch Biol Sci, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia.
C3 University of Melbourne; Monash University
RP Griffin, PC (corresponding author), Univ Melbourne, VLSCI, 700 Swanston St, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia.; Griffin, PC (corresponding author), Univ Melbourne, EMBL Australia Bioinformat Resource, 700 Swanston St, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia.
EM pip.griffin@gmail.com
RI Hoffmann, Ary/C-2961-2011
OI FOURNIER-LEVEL, ALEXANDRE/0000-0002-6047-7164; Griffin,
   Philippa/0000-0003-1538-8389; Hoffmann, Ary/0000-0001-9497-7645
FU Australian Research Council (ARC) Laureate Fellowship; Science and
   Industry Endowment Fund; Swiss National Science Foundation grants
   [PBEZP3_140043, PA00P3_145372]; Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
   [PBEZP3_140043, PA00P3_145372] Funding Source: Swiss National Science
   Foundation (SNF)
FX We would like to thank Charles Robin, Chuck Langley, and John Oakeshott
   for discussions, and Melissa Davis for advice on network building. We
   thank the two anonymous reviewers, and, particularly, David Begun, who
   provided useful and constructive comments that improved the manuscript.
   We also thank Ronald Lee for collecting the flies, and Lea Rako,
   Jennifer Shirriffs, Kelly Richardson, Anjali Goundar, and Yoshinori Endo
   for support with rearing of the laboratory lines. We would also like to
   thank the Victorian Life Science Computation Initiative (VLSCI) for
   high-performance computing services. This work was supported by an
   Australian Research Council (ARC) Laureate Fellowship, and a Science and
   Industry Endowment Fund grant to A.A.H., and Swiss National Science
   Foundation grants (PBEZP3_140043 and PA00P3_145372) to S.B.H. The
   funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis,
   decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
CR Anderson AR, 2005, MOL ECOL, V14, P851, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02445.x
   Andolfatto P, 1999, GENETICS, V153, P1297
   Andrews S., 2010, FASTQC V 0 10 1 QUAL
   Arendt J, 2008, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V23, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.011
   AYALA FJ, 1980, GENETICA, V52-3, P1
   Bailey SF, 2015, MOL BIOL EVOL, V32, P1436, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msv033
   Baldwin-Brown JG, 2014, MOL BIOL EVOL, V31, P1040, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msu048
   Berriz GF, 2009, BIOINFORMATICS, V25, P3043, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp498
   Bijlsma R, 2012, EVOL APPL, V5, P117, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00214.x
   BLOWS MW, 1993, EVOLUTION, V47, P1255, DOI [10.2307/2409990, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb02151.x]
   Bradic M, 2013, MOL BIOL EVOL, V30, P2383, DOI 10.1093/molbev/mst136
   Broad Institute, 2014, PIC V1 96
   Burke MK, 2014, MOL BIOL EVOL, V31, P3228, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msu256
   Burke MK, 2012, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V279, P5029, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2012.0799
   Burke MK, 2010, NATURE, V467, P587, DOI 10.1038/nature09352
   Byrne, 2013, ADAPTATION CLIMATE W
   Chan YF, 2010, SCIENCE, V327, P302, DOI 10.1126/science.1182213
   Chintapalli VR, 2007, NAT GENET, V39, P715, DOI 10.1038/ng2049
   Chippindale AK, 1998, EVOLUTION, V52, P1342, DOI [10.2307/2411304, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02016.x]
   Chown SL, 2011, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V57, P1070, DOI 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.05.004
   Cingolani P, 2012, FLY, V6, P80, DOI 10.4161/fly.19695
   COHAN FM, 1989, AM NAT, V134, P613, DOI 10.1086/285000
   COHAN FM, 1986, GENETICS, V114, P145
   Colosimo PF, 2005, SCIENCE, V307, P1928, DOI 10.1126/science.1107239
   Comeron JM, 2012, PLOS GENET, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002905
   Csardi G., 2006, The igraph software package for complex network research
   Dai AG, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P52, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1633, 10.1038/nclimate1633]
   Deagle BE, 2012, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V279, P1277, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2011.1552
   Delworth TL, 2014, NAT GEOSCI, V7, P583, DOI 10.1038/NGEO2201
   DePristo MA, 2011, NAT GENET, V43, P491, DOI 10.1038/ng.806
   dos Santos G, 2015, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V43, pD690, DOI 10.1093/nar/gku1099
   Elmer KR, 2014, NAT COMMUN, V5, DOI 10.1038/ncomms6168
   Elmer KR, 2011, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V26, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.02.008
   Fabian DK, 2012, MOL ECOL, V21, P4748, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05731.x
   Fisher RA, 1922, J R STAT SOC, V85, P87, DOI 10.2307/2340521
   Franks SJ, 2012, ANNU REV GENET, V46, P185, DOI 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155511
   Franssen SU, 2015, MOL BIOL EVOL, V32, P495, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msu320
   Gibbs AG, 2003, J EXP BIOL, V206, P1183, DOI 10.1242/jeb.00233
   Graveley BR, 2011, NATURE, V471, P473, DOI 10.1038/nature09715
   Griffin P. C., 2016, GRIFFINP DESICCATION
   Griffin P. C., 2016, GRIFFINP SEL LINE V0
   Griffiths JA, 2005, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V18, P213, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00782.x
   GRIFFITHS RC, 1982, THEOR APPL GENET, V62, P89, DOI 10.1007/BF00276292
   Harshman LG, 2000, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V15, P32, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01756-5
   Hoffmann AA, 2005, FUNCT ECOL, V19, P222, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.00959.x
   Hoffmann AA, 2003, SCIENCE, V301, P100, DOI 10.1126/science.1084296
   HOFFMANN AA, 1993, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V6, P643, DOI 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1993.6050643.x
   Hoffmann AA, 1999, HEREDITY, V83, P637, DOI 10.1038/sj.hdy.6886490
   Hoffmann AA, 2001, EVOLUTION, V55, P1621, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00681.x
   HOFFMANN AA, 1989, BIOL J LINN SOC, V37, P117, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1989.tb02098.x
   HOFFMANN AA, 1989, GENETICS, V122, P837
   Hoffmann AA, 2011, NATURE, V470, P479, DOI 10.1038/nature09670
   Huang W, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, pE6010, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1519159112
   Jones FC, 2012, NATURE, V484, P55, DOI 10.1038/nature10944
   Juenger TE, 2013, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V16, P274, DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2013.02.001
   Jurka J, 2005, CYTOGENET GENOME RES, V110, P462, DOI 10.1159/000084979
   Kapun M, 2014, MOL ECOL, V23, P1813, DOI 10.1111/mec.12594
   Kawecki TJ, 2006, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V19, P1265, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01071.x
   Kellermann V, 2009, SCIENCE, V325, P1244, DOI 10.1126/science.1175443
   Kessner D, 2015, GENETICS, V199, P991, DOI 10.1534/genetics.115.175075
   Kofler R, 2014, MOL BIOL EVOL, V31, P474, DOI 10.1093/molbev/mst221
   Kofler R, 2012, BIOINFORMATICS, V28, P2084, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts315
   Kofler R, 2011, BIOINFORMATICS, V27, P3435, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr589
   Lang GI, 2013, NATURE, V500, P571, DOI 10.1038/nature12344
   Li H, 2009, BIOINFORMATICS, V25, P1754, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
   Littell R.C., 2006, SAS System for Mixed Models, VSecond
   Lobkovsky Alexander E., 2012, Frontiers in Genetics, V3, P246, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2012.00246
   Lohbeck KT, 2013, EVOLUTION, V67, P1892, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01812.x
   Lohse M, 2012, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V40, pW622, DOI 10.1093/nar/gks540
   Lynch M, 2014, GENOME BIOL EVOL, V6, P1210, DOI 10.1093/gbe/evu085
   Marais DLD, 2010, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1206, P56, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05703.x
   Martin A, 2013, EVOLUTION, V67, P1235, DOI 10.1111/evo.12081
   Matos M, 2000, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V15, P206, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01844-9
   Matzkin LM, 2009, GENETICS, V182, P1279, DOI 10.1534/genetics.109.104927
   Murali T, 2014, BMC BIOINFORMATICS, V15, DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-15-177
   Murali T, 2011, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V39, pD736, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkq1092
   NEI M, 1981, GENETICS, V98, P625
   NICHOLAS FW, 1976, THEOR APPL GENET, V48, P263, DOI 10.1007/BF00264957
   Nordborg M, 2005, PLOS BIOL, V3, P1289, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030196
   Orozco-TerWengel P, 2012, MOL ECOL, V21, P4931, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05673.x
   Orr HA, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P1195, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2009.0282
   Orr HA, 1996, GENETICS, V144, P1331
   Orr HA, 2005, EVOLUTION, V59, P216
   Pichaud N, 2012, EVOLUTION, V66, P3189, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01683.x
   Pope B., 2013, RUBRA BIOINFORMATICS
   Qureshi ME, 2013, FOOD POLICY, V38, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.11.003
   R Core Team, 2014, R LANGUAGE ENV STAT
   Rajpurohit S, 2013, MOL ECOL, V22, P2698, DOI 10.1111/mec.12289
   Reed LK, 2014, GENETICS, V197, P781, DOI 10.1534/genetics.114.163857
   Roesti M, 2014, MOL ECOL, V23, P3944, DOI 10.1111/mec.12720
   Santos J, 2012, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V25, P2607, DOI 10.1111/jeb.12008
   Schiffer M, 2013, J EXP BIOL, V216, P3790, DOI 10.1242/jeb.085126
   Simoes P, 2010, GENETICA, V138, P999, DOI 10.1007/s10709-010-9486-4
   Simoes P, 2008, BMC EVOL BIOL, V8, DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-8-66
   Sinclair BJ, 2013, INTEGR COMP BIOL, V53, P545, DOI 10.1093/icb/ict004
   Smit AFA, 2013-2015 RepeatMasker Open-4.0
   Stern DL, 2013, NAT REV GENET, V14, P751, DOI 10.1038/nrg3483
   Telonis-Scott M, 2016, MOL BIOL EVOL, V33, P1053, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msv349
   Telonis-Scott M, 2012, MOL BIOL EVOL, V29, P1335, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msr294
   Tenaillon O, 2012, SCIENCE, V335, P457, DOI 10.1126/science.1212986
   Teotónio H, 2009, NAT GENET, V41, P251, DOI 10.1038/ng.289
   Tobler R, 2014, MOL BIOL EVOL, V31, P364, DOI 10.1093/molbev/mst205
   Turner TL, 2012, GENETICS, V191, P633, DOI 10.1534/genetics.112.139337
   Turner TL, 2011, PLOS GENET, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001336
   van Heerwaarden B, 2014, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V281, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2014.0396
   Vijendravarma RK, 2015, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V28, P876, DOI 10.1111/jeb.12611
   Willi Y, 2009, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V22, P124, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01631.x
NR 107
TC 43
Z9 44
U1 1
U2 38
PU GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
PI BETHESDA
PA 9650 ROCKVILLE AVE, BETHESDA, MD 20814 USA
SN 0016-6731
EI 1943-2631
J9 GENETICS
JI Genetics
PD FEB
PY 2017
VL 205
IS 2
BP 871
EP 890
DI 10.1534/genetics.116.187104
PG 20
WC Genetics & Heredity
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Genetics & Heredity
GA EK7ZY
UT WOS:000394144900029
PM 28007884
OA Green Published, Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Chen, W
   Hao, H
   Du, H
AF Chen, Wensu
   Hao, Hong
   Du, Hao
TI Failure analysis of corrugated panel subjected to windborne debris
   impacts
SO ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
LA English
DT Article
DE Experimental investigations; Corrugated metal panel; Windborne debris
   impact; Perforation resistance; Numerical simulation
ID STEEL PLATES; PROJECTILES; PERFORATION; PENETRATION; WIND
AB With the changing climate, more and more natural disasters such as cyclone, hurricane and typhoon take place around the world, which cause tremendous loss and damage. Damages of building structures by windborne debris impacts have been reported in almost all the previous major wind events. The windborne debris usually imposes localized impact loading and creates an opening on the building envelope, which might trigger serious damages to the building structures such as roof lift-up and collapse because strong wind pressures propagating into the structure. To withstand the impact of such extreme event, climate adaptation engineering solutions and technique need to be provided or improved for the building protection. The capacity requirement of panels to resist windborne debris impact is given in the Australian Wind Loading Code (AS/NZS 1170.2:2011) [1]. Corrugated metal panel, widely used as building envelope such as roof and wall cladding, might subject to the windborne debris impact. This study evaluates the capacity of corrugated panels to resist wind borne debris impact. Laboratory tests were carried out on corrugated metal panels of dimension 0.76 m by 1.2 m subjected to 4 kg wooden projectile impacts. The effect of various impact locations, impact velocities and boundary conditions on their performance has been studied. The failure and deformation modes under various impact scenarios were observed and compared. The dynamic responses were examined based on the deformations and the strains on the panel back face. The perforation resistance capacity of panels subjected to windborne debris impact were assessed and analyzed. In addition, a numerical model was developed in LS-DYNA to simulate the response and failure of the corrugated panel under windborne debris impact. The accuracy of the numerical model was calibrated with the test data. The validated numerical model was then used to obtain the results such as impact force, boundary reaction force and energy absorption. The vulnerability curve of the corrugated panel against windborne debris impact was also derived. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Chen, Wensu; Hao, Hong] Curtin Univ, Joint Res Ctr Struct Monitoring & Protect, Sch Civil & Mech Engn, Bentley, WA, Australia.
   [Du, Hao] Shangdong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Qingdao, Peoples R China.
C3 Curtin University; Shandong University of Science & Technology
RP Chen, W (corresponding author), Tianjin Univ, Tianjin, Peoples R China.
EM wensu.chen@curtin.edu.au
RI Chen, Wensu/F-8377-2017; Hao, Hong/D-6540-2013
OI Hao, Hong/0000-0001-7509-8653; Chen, Wensu/0000-0001-9933-8156
FU Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
   (CSIRO)
FX This research is financially supported by Australian Commonwealth
   Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) through the
   project "Climate Adaptation Engineering for Extreme Events Cluster". The
   authors acknowledge Mr. Naz Merai from Azuma Design, Mr. Michael
   Augustson, Mr. Mingyang Zhou and Mr. Jim Walters for their assistance in
   the lab. The authors also acknowledge iVEC for access to the Epic
   supercomputer facility.
CR [Anonymous], P361 FEMA
   [Anonymous], 2011, STRUCT DES ACT 2
   BACKMAN ME, 1978, INT J ENG SCI, V16, P1, DOI 10.1016/0020-7225(78)90002-2
   Borvik T, 2002, INT J IMPACT ENG, V27, P19, DOI 10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00034-3
   Borvik T, 1999, INT J IMPACT ENG, V22, P855, DOI 10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00011-1
   Chen XW, 2003, INT J IMPACT ENG, V28, P743, DOI 10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00152-5
   Corbett GG, 1996, INT J IMPACT ENG, V18, P141, DOI 10.1016/0734-743X(95)00023-4
   CTS, 2012, 59 CTS J COOK U
   Dey S, 2004, INT J IMPACT ENG, V30, P1005, DOI 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.06.004
   Enfedaque A, 2011, ENG FAIL ANAL, V18, P1652, DOI 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.01.004
   FEMA, 2008, P320 FEMA
   Frye U, 2009, 7 AS PAC C WIND ENG
   Jones N, 2012, STRUCTURAL IMPACT, P1
   Lin N, 2007, J STRUCT ENG-ASCE, V133, P274, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:2(274)
   Matsuia M, RECENT TORNADO DAMAG
   MENKES SB, 1973, EXP MECH, V13, P480, DOI 10.1007/BF02322734
   Minor J.E., 1972, J. Struct. Div, V98, P2455, DOI DOI 10.1061/JSDEAG.0003375
   OLSON MD, 1993, INT J IMPACT ENG, V13, P279, DOI 10.1016/0734-743X(93)90097-Q
   Rogers C.A., 1996, Ductility of G550 Sheet Steels in Tension-Elongation Measurements and Perforated Tests (No. R735)
   SBC, 1999, SO BUILD COD C INT B
   Shetty MS, 2014, ENG FAIL ANAL, V36, P226, DOI 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.10.005
   Sommer Drees, 2015, Sustainability assessment of windows and curtain walls Online
   State_of_Queensland, 2006, DES GUID QUEENSL PUB
NR 23
TC 36
Z9 40
U1 2
U2 33
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 1350-6307
EI 1873-1961
J9 ENG FAIL ANAL
JI Eng. Fail. Anal.
PD SEP
PY 2014
VL 44
BP 229
EP 249
DI 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.05.017
PG 21
WC Engineering, Mechanical; Materials Science, Characterization & Testing
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Materials Science
GA AO5AO
UT WOS:000341352800020
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Teweldebrihan, MD
   Lyu, HY
   Pande, S
   McClain, ME
AF Teweldebrihan, Meseret Dawit
   Lyu, Haoyang
   Pande, Saket
   McClain, Michael E.
TI Smallholder Farmer's Adaptability to Anthropogenic and Climate-Induced
   Variability in the Dhidhessa River Sub-basin, Ethiopia
SO FRONTIERS IN WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE Dhidhessa river sub-basin; crop production; price volatility; adaptation
   strategy; climate resilience; smallholder sociohydrology; climate
   variability
ID BLUE NILE BASIN; SOCIO-HYDROLOGY; RANDOM FOREST; WATER; CLASSIFICATION;
   PRODUCTIVITY; MAHARASHTRA; ALGORITHM; CAPACITY; RAINFALL
AB Ethiopia depends on rain-fed agriculture with limited use of irrigation for agricultural production. More than 90% of the food supply in the country comes from low productivity rain-fed smallholder agriculture. Since the livelihoods of many farmers depend on rainfed agriculture, this paper investigates how smallholders adapt to climate variability. Dhidhessa sub-basin of the Blue Nile river basin is home to many vulnerable immigrant smallholders from other parts of Ethiopia. Our study focuses on this sub-basin to understand how crop production and patterns have depended on rainfall. Secondary data on land cover and croplands, the number of households growing crops, crop yields, crop prices and area covered by three major crops (teff, maize, and sorghum) are analyzed over a period 2000-2019 and interpreted in light of a primary household survey of 135 farmers in the basin. Results show that almost 40% of the basin is under crop cultivation, and the area under cultivation has been growing 8.6 parts per thousand per year. Irrespective of rainfall variability, the number of households practicing crop cultivation has also been growing over the years. This means that more farmers are moving into the basin to cultivate. Analysis reveals that adaptation strategies are at play. Farmer decisions to grow which crops are sensitive to rainfall and their expectations of crop prices resulting from rainfall variability. Their decisions and crop prices are endogenous to the smallholder sociohydrology of the basin, leading more farmers to grow Teff relative to other crops in years of lower rainfall. These decisions are due to the lower sensitivity of Teff prices to rainfall variability and farmers' expectations of higher Teff prices relative to other crops as rainfall decreases. Such behavior also induces climate resilience, enabling farmers to respond to climate variability rather than migrating out of the basin. Moreover, it allows more farmers to migrate in and engage in crop cultivation within the basin. Such an adaptive strategy based on past experiences offers a way forward to incorporating adaptation mechanisms in sociohydrological models to simulate and assess water futures for similar basins worldwide.</p>
C1 [Teweldebrihan, Meseret Dawit; Lyu, Haoyang; Pande, Saket; McClain, Michael E.] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Water Management, Delft, Netherlands.
   [Teweldebrihan, Meseret Dawit; McClain, Michael E.] IHE Delft Inst Water Educ, Dept Water Resources & Ecosyst, Delft, Netherlands.
C3 Delft University of Technology; IHE Delft Institute for Water Education
RP Teweldebrihan, MD (corresponding author), Delft Univ Technol, Dept Water Management, Delft, Netherlands.; Teweldebrihan, MD (corresponding author), IHE Delft Inst Water Educ, Dept Water Resources & Ecosyst, Delft, Netherlands.
EM m.d.teweldebrihan@tudelft.nl
RI Pande, Saket/A-2671-2009; Teweldebrihan, Meseret/AHE-5070-2022; Moges,
   Michael/HGC-1516-2022
OI Pande, Saket/0000-0003-3061-3185
CR Adgolign T.B., 2015, INT J CIVIL STRUCTUR, V5, P105
   Adgolign TB, 2016, SUST WAT RESOUR MAN, V2, P55, DOI 10.1007/s40899-015-0041-4
   Akay A, 2012, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V81, P421, DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.12.006
   Andersson L., 2014, MIGRATION REMITTANCE
   [Anonymous], 2007, CLIM CHANG NAT AD PR
   [Anonymous], 2012, ETH DEM HLTH SURV 20
   Awulachew S., 2010, Irrigation potential in Ethiopia: Constraints and opportunities for enhancing the system
   Balehegn M, 2019, PASTORALISM, V9, DOI 10.1186/s13570-019-0143-y
   Bekele WT, 2021, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V12, P2325, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2021.307
   Belay Abrham., 2017, Agriculture Food Security, V6, P24, DOI [10.1186/s40066-017-0100-1, DOI 10.1186/S40066-017-0100-1]
   Chen W, 2017, CATENA, V151, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2016.11.032
   Chimdessa K, 2019, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V6, DOI 10.3390/hydrology6010002
   Conway D, 2000, GEOGR J, V166, P49, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2000.tb00006.x
   CSA, 2017, FED DEM REP ETH
   Debela N, 2015, SPRINGERPLUS, V4, DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-1012-9
   Dechassa Chala, 2019, African Journal of Agricultural Research, V15, P149, DOI 10.5897/AJAR2019.14054
   Delango M.W., 2019, BUDAPEST INT RES CRI, V2, P99, DOI [10.33258/birci.v2i4.609, DOI 10.33258/BIRCI.V2I4.609]
   den Besten NI, 2016, P INT ASS HYDROL SCI, V373, P115, DOI 10.5194/piahs-373-115-2016
   Di Baldassarre G, 2013, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V17, P3295, DOI 10.5194/hess-17-3295-2013
   Fuchs S, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P3183, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-3183-2017
   Gober P, 2014, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V18, P1413, DOI 10.5194/hess-18-1413-2014
   Goodman LA., 1961, ANN MATH STAT, P148, DOI [DOI 10.1214/AOMS/1177705148, 10.1214/aoms/1177705148]
   Gorelick N, 2017, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V202, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
   Hagedorn Marcus., 2013, Unemploy- ment Benefits and Unemployment in the Great Recession: The Role of Macro Effects
   Heitmueller A, 2005, J POPUL ECON, V18, P93, DOI 10.1007/s00148-004-0192-3
   Huang HB, 2017, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V202, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2017.02.021
   Jemberie MA, 2016, SPRING GEOGR, P341, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-18787-7_17
   Johnson T.P., 2014, Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, DOI [10.1002/9781118445112.stat05720, DOI 10.1002/9781118445112.STAT05720, 10.1002/9781118445112.STAT05720]
   Jovanovic N, 2020, IRRIG DRAIN, V69, P70, DOI 10.1002/ird.2238
   Kabeta T., 2019, DETERMINANTS SMALLHO
   Legesse S., 2015, J Geol. Geophys, V4, DOI [DOI 10.4172/2329-6755.1000193, 10.4172/2329-6755.1000193]
   Leong C, 2018, WATER RESOUR RES, V54, P3100, DOI 10.1002/2017WR022036
   Lyu H, 2020, HYDROLOG SCI J, V65, P2175, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2020.1802030
   Lyu HY, 2020, J HYDROL, V582, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124524
   Lyu HY, 2019, PALGR COMMUN, V5, DOI 10.1057/s41599-019-0302-1
   Manaswi C.M., 2014, International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology, V5, P529
   Mati B. M., 2006, IWMI Working Paper
   Mekuria W., 2018, Advances in Plants Agriculture Research, V8, P348, DOI DOI 10.15406/APAR.2018.08.00336
   Montanari A, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P4768, DOI 10.1002/2015WR017430
   Niles MT, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-16282-9
   Panda A, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P782, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.002
   Pande S., 2020, OXFORD RES ENCY ENV, DOI [10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.657, DOI 10.1093/ACREFORE/9780199389414.013.657]
   Pande S, 2016, WATER RESOUR RES, V52, P1923, DOI 10.1002/2015WR017841
   Rockstrom J., 2003, WATER PRODUCTIVITY A, V85199, P8, DOI [10.1079/9780851996691.0145, DOI 10.1079/9780851996691.0145]
   Roobavannan M, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P8344, DOI 10.1002/2017WR020671
   Roobavannan M, 2017, ECOL ECON, V136, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.006
   Roobavannan M, 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V22, P1337, DOI 10.5194/hess-22-1337-2018
   Ruben R., 2000, CLIMATE VARIABILITY
   Shelestov A, 2017, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V5, P1, DOI 10.3389/feart.2017.00017
   Simelton E, 2009, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V12, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.11.005
   Sivapalan M, 2012, HYDROL PROCESS, V26, P1270, DOI 10.1002/hyp.8426
   Strzepek K. M., 2007, The impacts of climate change on regional water resources and agriculture in Africa, V4290
   Teluguntla P, 2018, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V144, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.07.017
   Tesemma ZK, 2010, HYDROL PROCESS, V24, P3747, DOI 10.1002/hyp.7893
   Teweldebrihan MD, 2020, HYDROLOG SCI J, V65, P1985, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2020.1789145
   Tolessa T, 2020, GEOJOURNAL, V85, P747, DOI 10.1007/s10708-019-09990-4
   Viglione A, 2014, J HYDROL, V518, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.018
   Villani L, 2018, J AGRIC ENVIRON INT, V112, P139, DOI 10.12895/jaeid.20181.726
   Wedajo GK., 2019, Environ Syst Res, V8, P1, DOI [10.1186/s40068-019-0159-8, DOI 10.1186/S40068-019-0159-8]
   World Bank, 1997, World development report 1997: The state in a changing world
   Xiong J, 2017, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V126, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.01.019
   Yang TT, 2016, WATER RESOUR RES, V52, P1626, DOI 10.1002/2015WR017394
   Zewdie MC, 2020, AGR WATER MANAGE, V233, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106101
NR 63
TC 2
Z9 3
U1 1
U2 9
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2624-9375
J9 FRONT WATER
JI Front. Water
PD OCT 25
PY 2021
VL 3
AR 735004
DI 10.3389/frwa.2021.735004
PG 12
WC Water Resources
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Water Resources
GA WV4QZ
UT WOS:000717224100001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Li, GC
   Yi, ZQ
   Han, LQ
   Hu, P
   Chen, W
   Ye, XF
   Yang, Z
AF Li, Guangchao
   Yi, Zhaoqin
   Han, Liqin
   Hu, Ping
   Chen, Wei
   Ye, Xuefeng
   Yang, Zhen
TI The Synergistic Effect of the Same Climatic Factors on Water Use
   Efficiency Varies between Daily and Monthly Scales
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE synergistic effect; climatic factors; water use efficiency; machine
   learning
ID GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTION; LATENT-HEAT FLUX; ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS;
   GRASSLAND ECOSYSTEMS; 10-YEAR VARIABILITY; FOREST ECOSYSTEMS; CARBON
   EXCHANGE; INNER-MONGOLIA; CHINA; VEGETATION
AB The coupled processes of ecosystem carbon and water cycles are usually evaluated using the water use efficiency (WUE), and improving WUE is crucial for maintaining the sustainability of ecosystems. However, it remains unclear whether the WUE in different ecosystem responds synchronously to the synergistic effect of the same climate factors at daily and monthly scales. Therefore, we employed a machine learning-driven factor analysis method and a geographic detector model, and we quantitatively evaluated the individual effects and the synergistic effect of climate factors on the daily mean water use efficiency (WUED) and monthly mean water use efficiency (WUEM) in different ecosystems in China. Our results showed that (1) among the 10 carbon flux monitoring sites in China, WUED and WUEM exhibited the highest positive correlations with the near-surface air humidity and the highest negative correlation with solar radiation. The correlation between WUEM and climate factors was generally greater than that between WUED and climate factors. (2) There were significant differences in the order of importance and degree of impact of the same climate factors on WUED and WUEM in the different ecosystems. Among the 10 carbon flux monitoring sites in China, the near-surface air humidity imposed the greatest influence on the WUED and WUEM changes, followed by the near-surface water vapor pressure. (3) There were significant differences in the synergistic effects of the same climate factors on WUED and WUEM in the different ecosystems. Among the 10 carbon flux monitoring sites in China, the WUED variability was most sensitive to the synergistic effect of solar radiation and photosynthetically active radiation, while the WUEM variability was most sensitive to the synergistic effect of the near-surface air humidity and soil moisture. The research results indicated that synchronous responses of the WUE in very few ecosystems to the same climate factors and their synergistic effect occurred at daily and monthly scales. This finding enhances the understanding of sustainable water resource use and the impact of climate change on water use efficiency, providing crucial insights for improving climate-adaptive ecosystem management and sustainable water resource utilization across different ecosystems.
C1 [Li, Guangchao; Han, Liqin; Hu, Ping] Henan Normal Univ, Coll Tourism, Xinxiang 453007, Peoples R China.
   [Yi, Zhaoqin] Henan Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, Xinxiang 453007, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Wei] China Univ Min & Technol, Coll Geosci & Surveying Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.
   [Ye, Xuefeng] Zhongyuan Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Zhengzhou 450000, Peoples R China.
   [Yang, Zhen] Henan Univ Technol, Coll Informat Sci & Engn, Zhengzhou 450001, Peoples R China.
C3 Henan Normal University; Henan Normal University; China University of
   Mining & Technology; Henan University of Technology
RP Yi, ZQ (corresponding author), Henan Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, Xinxiang 453007, Peoples R China.
EM 2023219@htu.edu.cn; 2022087@htu.edu.cn; hanliqin@lzb.ac.cn;
   hping0719@163.com; chenw@cumtb.edu.cn; yexuefeng@work.zykj.edu.cn;
   zhenyang@haut.edu.cn
RI Li, Guangchao/AAG-4282-2020; Chen, Wei/GWZ-5380-2022
OI Yang, Zhen/0000-0002-2347-2225; chen, wei/0000-0002-2585-9984
FU Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF; National Key Research and
   Development Program [2022YFF0711704]; National High-Resolution Earth
   Observation System Major Technology Project [92-Y50G35-9001-22/23];
   Science and Technology Research Project of Henan Province
   [232102321057]; PhD scientific research startup fund of Henan Normal
   University [5101049170860];  [5201049430109]
FX This study was supported by the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF
   (5201049430109), National Key Research and Development Program
   (2022YFF0711704), National High-Resolution Earth Observation System
   Major Technology Project (92-Y50G35-9001-22/23), Science and Technology
   Research Project of Henan Province (Grant 232102321057) and PhD
   scientific research startup fund of Henan Normal University
   (5101049170860).
CR Baldocchi D, 2001, B AM METEOROL SOC, V82, P2415, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<2415:FANTTS>2.3.CO;2
   Birhanu D, 2019, HYDROL PROCESS, V33, P2206, DOI 10.1002/hyp.13464
   Boese S, 2017, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V14, P3015, DOI 10.5194/bg-14-3015-2017
   Chen Z, 2013, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V182, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.026
   Dayalu A, 2018, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V15, P6713, DOI 10.5194/bg-15-6713-2018
   Deng YH, 2020, J HYDROL, V585, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124744
   Gui X, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V793, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148443
   Guo Q, 2015, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V214, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.08.251
   Han L, 2020, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V189, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103175
   Hao YB, 2018, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V266, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2018.06.010
   He MZ, 2013, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V173, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.01.003
   Helman D, 2017, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V232, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.08.018
   Hu ZM, 2008, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V14, P1609, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01582.x
   Huang X, 2010, J ARID ENVIRON, V74, P1616, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.07.005
   Jabeur SB, 2024, ANN OPER RES, V334, P679, DOI 10.1007/s10479-021-04187-w
   Jiang YZ, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14164094
   Kim D, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V773, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145519
   Kottek M, 2006, METEOROL Z, V15, P259, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130
   Li GC, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19053121
   Li GC, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107680
   Li HL, 2022, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V319, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108919
   Li X, 2021, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102269
   Li XR, 2016, ECOL MODEL, V324, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.12.019
   Liang L, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14081902
   Liu Xiao, 2017, Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, V41, P497, DOI 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0378
   Liu XM, 2018, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V123, P3933, DOI 10.1002/2017JD028035
   Liu ZJ, 2017, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V233, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.12.001
   Liu ZJ, 2015, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V7, P135, DOI 10.3390/rs70100135
   Ma JY, 2019, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V275, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.05.004
   Nandy S, 2022, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V269, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112791
   Niu SL, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P1073, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02280.x
   Niu ZG, 2019, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V279, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107701
   Pascolini-Campbell M, 2021, NATURE, V593, P543, DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-03503-5
   Ren HG, 2022, FOR ECOSYST, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.fecs.2022.100011
   Scott RL, 2015, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V120, P2612, DOI 10.1002/2015JG003181
   Song QH, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/srep43031
   Tan ZH, 2015, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V120, P464, DOI 10.1002/2014JD022535
   Tang XG, 2017, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/rs9060616
   Tang XG, 2016, ECOL ENG, V91, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.02.022
   Wang YP, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11111359
   Wang Y, 2018, FIELD CROP RES, V226, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.07.006
   Wang YY, 2020, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V142, P1, DOI 10.1007/s00704-020-03303-3
   Xiao BQ, 2023, J HYDROL, V617, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128968
   Xie J, 2016, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V218, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.12.059
   Yang QD, 2021, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V307, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108542
   Yang XQ, 2018, HYDROL RES, V49, P1330, DOI 10.2166/nh.2018.173
   Yang YK, 2017, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V125, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.01.016
   Yao YJ, 2015, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V165, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2015.05.013
   Yao YJ, 2013, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V171, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.11.016
   Yu GR, 2008, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V14, P2555, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01663.x
   Yu GR, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P798, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12079
   Yu GR, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V177, P927, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02316.x
   Yuan WP, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P1416, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2010.01.022
   Zhang L, 2016, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V226, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.05.018
   Zhang L, 2015, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V7, P11183, DOI 10.3390/rs70911183
   Zhang YL, 2019, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V124, P2419, DOI 10.1029/2019JG005117
   Zhu XJ, 2014, J FOREST RES-JPN, V19, P70, DOI 10.1007/s10310-013-0390-5
NR 57
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 6
U2 6
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD OCT
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 20
AR 8925
DI 10.3390/su16208925
PG 20
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA K1H3J
UT WOS:001341458700001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Huang, XY
   Hall, AD
   Berg, N
AF Huang, Xingying
   Hall, Alex D.
   Berg, Neil
TI Anthropogenic Warming Impacts on Today's Sierra Nevada Snowpack and
   Flood Risk
SO GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
LA English
DT Article
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; CALIFORNIA DROUGHT; PRECIPITATION; CHARACTER
AB This study investigates temperature impacts to snowpack and runoff-driven flood risk over the Sierra Nevada during the extremely wet year of 2016-2017, which followed the extraordinary California drought of 2011-2015. By perturbing near-surface temperatures from a 9-km dynamically downscaled simulation, a series of offline land surface model experiments explore how Sierra Nevada hydrology has already been impacted by historical anthropogenic warming and how these impacts evolve under future warming scenarios. Results show that historical warming reduced 2016-2017 Sierra Nevada snow water equivalent by 20% while increasing early-season runoff by 30%. An additional one third to two thirds loss of snowpack is projected by the end of the century, depending on the emission scenario, with middle elevations experiencing the most significant declines. Notably, the number of days in the future with runoff exceeding 20mm nearly doubles under a mitigation emission scenarios and triples under a business-as-usual scenario. A smaller snow-to-rain ratio, as opposed to increased snowmelt, is found to be the primary mechanism of temperature impacts to Sierra snowpack and runoff. These findings are consequential to the prevalence of early-season floods in the Sierra Nevada. In the Feather River Watershed, historical warming increased runoff by over one third during the period of heaviest precipitation in February 2017. This suggests that historical anthropogenic warming may have exacerbated runoff conditions underlying the Oroville Dam spillway overflow that occurred in this month. As warming continues in the future, the potential for runoff-based flood risk may rise even higher.
   Plain Language Summary This study investigates temperature impacts to snowpack and runoff-driven flood risk over the Sierra Nevada during the extremely wet year of 2016-2017. Significant findings have been revealed related to recent public aware precipitation extremes. With a reasonably accurate representation of the historical precipitation and snowpack over the Sierra Nevada, results from the offline simulations with perturbed near-surface temperature reveal significant impacts of warming on snow water equivalent loss and flood risk. As the drought condition predicts to be more severe and precipitation to be more extreme, the loss of snowpack and intensified flood risk informs policymakers for better climate adaptation strategies for water resources supply and flood control.
C1 [Huang, Xingying; Hall, Alex D.; Berg, Neil] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.
C3 University of California System; University of California Los Angeles
RP Huang, XY (corresponding author), Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.
EM xingyhuang@ucla.edu
OI Huang, Xingying/0000-0003-2494-9897
FU U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science project ("An Integrated
   Evaluation of the Simulated Hydroclimate System of the Continental US")
   [DE-SC0016605]; Metabolic Studio; Annenberg Foundation [12-469]
FX We would like to thank two reviewers and the Editor for very helpful
   comments and input. The authors would like to thank Fengpeng Sun, Jerry
   Huang, Daniel Walton, and J. David Neelin for their assistance and
   suggestions. We acknowledge the substantial efforts behind the CMIP5
   simulation archive and the station observations from the California
   Department of Water Resources used in this study. Data and code used in
   the study can be accessed through the public link
   (http://portal.nersc.gov/project/m2637/snowpack/) or by contacting the
   corresponding author (at xingyhuang@ucla.edu). Funding for this work was
   provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science project
   ("An Integrated Evaluation of the Simulated Hydroclimate System of the
   Continental US" (award no. DE-SC0016605)) and by the Metabolic Studio in
   partnership with the Annenberg Foundation (grant 12-469, Climate Change
   Projections in the Sierra Nevada).
CR Berg N, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P2511, DOI 10.1002/2016GL072104
   Caldwell P, 2010, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V49, P2147, DOI 10.1175/2010JAMC2388.1
   Caldwell P, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V95, P499, DOI 10.1007/s10584-009-9583-5
   Dettinger M, 2011, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V47, P514, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00546.x
   Gleick P. H., 1987, INFLUENCE CLIMATE CH, V168, P389
   Hamlet AF, 2007, WATER RESOUR RES, V43, DOI 10.1029/2006WR005099
   Herbarium J., 2017, JEPSON FLORA PROJECT
   Huang XY, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P7555, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0673.1
   Huang XY, 2016, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V8, P345, DOI 10.1002/2015MS000559
   LETTENMAIER DP, 1990, WATER RESOUR RES, V26, P69, DOI 10.1029/WR026i001p00069
   Leung LR, 2009, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V36, DOI 10.1029/2008GL036445
   Mao YX, 2015, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V42, P2805, DOI 10.1002/2015GL063456
   Maurer EP, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V82, P309, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9180-9
   Mesinger F, 2006, B AM METEOROL SOC, V87, P343, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-87-3-343
   Niu GY, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V116, DOI 10.1029/2010JD015139
   Riahi K, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P33, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y
   Seager R., 2014, Causes and Predictability of the 2011-14 California Drought
   Skamarock WC, 2008, J COMPUT PHYS, V227, P3465, DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.01.037
   Soares PMM, 2012, CLIM DYNAM, V39, P2497, DOI 10.1007/s00382-012-1315-2
   Stocker, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013
   Sun FP, 2016, J CLIMATE, V29, P91, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0199.1
   Swain DL, 2014, B AM METEOROL SOC, V95, pS3
   Taylor KE, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P485, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
   Thompson G, 2008, MON WEATHER REV, V136, P5095, DOI 10.1175/2008MWR2387.1
   Thomson AM, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P77, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4
   Vahedifard F, 2017, SCIENCE, V355, P1139, DOI 10.1126/science.aan0171
   von Storch H, 2000, MON WEATHER REV, V128, P3664, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<3664:ASNTFD>2.0.CO;2
   Walton DB, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P1417, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0168.1
   Walton DB, 2015, J CLIMATE, V28, P4597, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00196.1
   Wilkinson R., 2002, PREPARING CHANGING C
NR 30
TC 59
Z9 71
U1 2
U2 42
PU AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
PI WASHINGTON
PA 2000 FLORIDA AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20009 USA
SN 0094-8276
EI 1944-8007
J9 GEOPHYS RES LETT
JI Geophys. Res. Lett.
PD JUN 28
PY 2018
VL 45
IS 12
BP 6215
EP 6222
DI 10.1029/2018GL077432
PG 8
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology
GA GM8QY
UT WOS:000438499100044
OA Bronze, Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Kynoch, C
   Paladino, FV
   Spotila, JR
   Tomillo, PS
AF Kynoch, Camille
   Paladino, Frank V.
   Spotila, James R.
   Tomillo, Pilar Santidrian
TI Variability in thermal tolerance of clutches from different mothers
   indicates adaptation potential to climate warming in sea turtles
SO GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptation; climate warming; sea turtle; thermal adaptation; thermal
   tolerance variation
ID CHELONIA-MYDAS; DERMOCHELYS-CORIACEA; LEATHERBACK TURTLES;
   INCUBATION-TEMPERATURE; EMERGENCE SUCCESS; CARETTA-CARETTA;
   CONSERVATION; PERFORMANCE; EMBRYOS; EGGS
AB The current climate warming is a challenge to biodiversity that could surpass the adaptation capacity of some species. Hence, understanding the means by which populations undergo an increase in their thermal tolerance is critical to assess how they could adapt to climate warming. Specifically, sea turtle populations could respond to increasing temperatures by (1) colonizing new nesting areas, (2) nesting during cooler times of the year, and/or (3) by increasing their thermal tolerance. Differences in thermal tolerance of clutches laid by different females would indicate that populations have the potential to adapt by natural selection. Here, we used exhaustive information on nest temperatures and hatching success of leatherback turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) clutches over 14 years to assess the occurrence of individual variability in thermal tolerance among females. We found an effect of temperature, year, and the interaction between female identity and nest temperature on hatching success, indicating that clutches laid by different females exhibited different levels of vulnerability to high temperatures. If thermal tolerance is a heritable trait, individuals with higher thermal tolerances could have greater chances of passing their genes to following generations, increasing their frequency in the population. However, the high rate of failure of clutches at temperatures above 32 degrees C suggests that leatherback turtles are already experiencing extreme heat stress. A proper understanding of mechanisms of adaptation in populations to counteract changes in climate could greatly contribute to future conservation of endangered populations in a rapidly changing world.
   High temperatures can cause lowered hatching success in sea turtle nests, therefore understanding the naturally occurring variation of thermal tolerances in populations is important in the face of climate change. Using data from 17 leatherback sea turtle nesting seasons, we show that there is naturally occurring variation in the thermal tolerances of clutches produced by different mothers. If offspring with these high tolerances survive to reproduce and these traits are heritable, then higher thermal tolerances traits can be passed on to future generations, and there is potential to adapt and persist under climate change.image
C1 [Kynoch, Camille] Florida State Univ, Dept Earth Ocean & Atmospher Sci, Tallahassee, FL 32304 USA.
   [Paladino, Frank V.; Spotila, James R.] Leatherback Trust, Goldring Gund Marine Biol Stn, Playa Grande, Costa Rica.
   [Paladino, Frank V.] Purdue Univ Ft Wayne, Dept Biol, Ft Wayne, IN 46805 USA.
   [Spotila, James R.] Drexel Univ, Dept Biodivers Earth & Environm Sci, Philadelphia, PA USA.
   [Tomillo, Pilar Santidrian] CSIC, Inst Espanol Oceanog IEO, Ctr Oceanog Balears, Palma De Mallorca, Spain.
C3 State University System of Florida; Florida State University; Purdue
   University System; Purdue University; Drexel University; Consejo
   Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC); Spanish Institute of
   Oceanography
RP Kynoch, C (corresponding author), Florida State Univ, Dept Earth Ocean & Atmospher Sci, Tallahassee, FL 32304 USA.
EM kynochcamille@gmail.com
RI Santidrián Tomillo, Pilar/N-5406-2014; kynoch, camille/KEH-2272-2024
OI Kynoch, Camille/0000-0003-2730-0516; Santidrian Tomillo,
   Pilar/0000-0002-6895-7218
FX We thank field assistants, volunteers from the Earthwatch Institute and
   field coordinators that contributed to the data collection over 14
   nesting seasons. We are especially thankful to the dedicated biologists
   that took the many temperature readings over the years. We also thank
   the Ministry of Environment and Energy and the Tempisque Conservation
   Area for providing research permits and their volunteers for helping to
   patrol the beach. We are grateful to Alejandro Martinez Abrain for
   providing statistical advice and reading an early version of the
   manuscript. Special thanks to the staff members of TLT at the Playa
   Grande Goldring-Gund Marine Station and at the San Jose office for their
   logistical support.
CR Alam SK, 2000, J ENVIRON SCI HEAL B, V35, P705, DOI 10.1080/03601230009373303
   [Anonymous], 2015, Clim. Chang. Responses, DOI [DOI 10.1186/S40665-014-0009-X, 10.1186/s40665-014-0009-x]
   Bell BA, 2004, BIOL CONSERV, V115, P131, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00102-2
   Bennett S, 2019, PHILOS T R SOC B, V374, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2018.0550
   Bentley BP, 2020, FUNCT ECOL, V34, P2302, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13645
   Bentley BP, 2017, MOL ECOL, V26, P2978, DOI 10.1111/mec.14087
   Bodensteiner BL, 2021, J EXP ZOOL PART A, V335, P173, DOI 10.1002/jez.2414
   Booth DT, 2022, AUST J ZOOL, V70, P211, DOI 10.1071/ZO23013
   Booth DT, 2018, J EXP ZOOL PART A, V329, P343, DOI 10.1002/jez.2195
   Booth DT, 2017, INTEGR ZOOL, V12, P352, DOI 10.1111/1749-4877.12255
   Bowen BW, 2007, MOL ECOL, V16, P4886, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03542.x
   BOWEN BW, 1992, EVOLUTION, V46, P865, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb00605.x
   CARR A, 1974, NATURE, V249, P128, DOI 10.1038/249128a0
   Carreras C, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI [10.1038/s41598-018-22718-7, 10.1038/s41598-018-19887-w]
   Clarke LM, 2010, ECOLOGY, V91, P3526, DOI 10.1890/09-0548.1
   Clusella-Trullas S, 2022, NATURE, V611, P39, DOI 10.1038/d41586-022-03365-5
   Clusella-Trullas S, 2021, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V36, P1000, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.001
   Clusella-Trullas S, 2011, AM NAT, V177, P738, DOI 10.1086/660021
   Debes PV, 2021, HEREDITY, V127, P455, DOI 10.1038/s41437-021-00469-y
   Diamond SE, 2017, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1389, P5, DOI 10.1111/nyas.13223
   Doody JS, 2006, EVOL ECOL, V20, P307, DOI 10.1007/s10682-006-0003-2
   Drake DL, 2002, J THERM BIOL, V27, P71, DOI 10.1016/S0306-4565(01)00017-1
   Drury C, 2022, COMMUN BIOL, V5, DOI 10.1038/s42003-022-03428-3
   Du WG, 2019, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V286, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2019.2078
   Eliason EJ, 2011, SCIENCE, V332, P109, DOI 10.1126/science.1199158
   Abrego ME, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-60581-7
   Fish MR, 2005, CONSERV BIOL, V19, P482, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00146.x
   Foden WB, 2019, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V10, DOI 10.1002/wcc.551
   Foo SA, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0042497
   Freeman MT, 2022, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V119, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2116645119
   Fuentes MMPB, 2024, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V30, DOI 10.1111/gcb.16991
   Fuentes MMPB, 2013, ECOL MODEL, V251, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.12.020
   Fuentes MMPB, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P140, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02192.x
   Fuentes MMPB, 2010, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V412, P283, DOI 10.3354/meps08678
   Fuentes MMPB, 2023, ENDANGER SPECIES RES, V52, P303, DOI 10.3354/esr01278
   Gammon M, 2020, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2020.556379
   Gatto CR, 2021, ENDANGER SPECIES RES, V44, P397, DOI 10.3354/esr01111
   GODFREY MH, 1994, COPEIA, P808
   Hamann M, 2013, CRC MAR BIOL SER, P353
   Hawkes Lucy A., 2009, Endangered Species Research, V7, P137, DOI 10.3354/esr00198
   Hays GC, 2017, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V284, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2016.2576
   Hendry AP, 2000, SCIENCE, V290, P516, DOI 10.1126/science.290.5491.516
   Heppell SS, 2003, CRC MAR BIOL SER, P275
   Heppell SS, 1999, AM FISH S S, V23, P137
   Hirayama Ren, 1994, Island Arc, V3, P270, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1738.1994.tb00116.x
   Hochscheid S, 2022, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02194
   Hoffmann AA, 2013, FUNCT ECOL, V27, P934, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02036.x
   Houghton JDR, 2007, J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL, V345, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.jembe.2007.02.001
   Howard R, 2014, ENDANGER SPECIES RES, V26, P75, DOI 10.3354/esr00636
   Huey RB, 2003, AM NAT, V161, P357, DOI 10.1086/346135
   Jensen MP, 2018, CURR BIOL, V28, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.057
   Jones TT, 2011, J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL, V399, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.jembe.2011.01.007
   Jorgensen LB, 2022, NATURE, V611, P93, DOI 10.1038/s41586-022-05334-4
   Laloë JO, 2023, ROY SOC OPEN SCI, V10, DOI 10.1098/rsos.221002
   Lee TM, 2008, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V275, P1261, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2007.1732
   Leslie Alison J., 1996, Chelonian Conservation and Biology, V2, P159
   Li T, 2018, PHYSIOL BIOCHEM ZOOL, V91, P673, DOI 10.1086/694856
   Maulany RI, 2012, COPEIA, P738, DOI 10.1643/CH-12-088
   McCaw BA, 2020, INTEGR COMP BIOL, V60, P1469, DOI 10.1093/icb/icaa049
   Miller Jeffrey D., 1999, P124
   MORREALE SJ, 1982, SCIENCE, V216, P1245, DOI 10.1126/science.7079758
   Mottola G, 2022, ECOSPHERE, V13, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.4015
   Paaijmans KP, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P2373, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12240
   PALADINO FV, 1990, NATURE, V344, P858, DOI 10.1038/344858a0
   Patrício AR, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P522, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14520
   Pike DA, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P7, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12397
   Rafferty AR, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0021038
   Tomillo PS, 2020, BIOESSAYS, V42, DOI 10.1002/bies.202000146
   Tomillo PS, 2015, SCI REP-UK, V5, DOI 10.1038/srep16789
   Tomillo PS, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P2980, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12918
   Santidrián-Tomillo P, 2017, LAT AM J AQUAT RES, V45, P563, DOI 10.3856/vol45-issue3-fulltext-6
   Sarti L., 2000, Dermochelys coriacea. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
   Sasaki MC, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P4147, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14811
   Saura LH, 2022, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V170, DOI 10.1007/s10584-022-03325-y
   Sinaei M, 2017, ARCH ENVIRON CON TOX, V73, P552, DOI 10.1007/s00244-017-0421-x
   Sinclair BJ, 2016, ECOL LETT, V19, P1372, DOI 10.1111/ele.12686
   Somero GN, 2010, J EXP BIOL, V213, P912, DOI 10.1242/jeb.037473
   SPOTILA JR, 1987, HERPETOLOGICA, V43, P74
   STANDORA EA, 1985, COPEIA, P711, DOI 10.2307/1444765
   Stillman JH, 2000, PHYSIOL BIOCHEM ZOOL, V73, P200, DOI 10.1086/316738
   Tedeschi JN, 2016, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V283, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2015.2320
   Thomas CD, 2004, NATURE, V430, DOI 10.1038/nature02719
   Tilley D, 2019, J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL, V514, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.jembe.2019.04.001
   Tomillo PS, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V159, P163, DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02658-w
   Tomillo PS, 2023, BIOL CONSERV, V284, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110146
   Tomillo PS, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0177256
   Tomillo PS, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037602
   Tomillo PS, 2009, MAR BIOL, V156, P2021, DOI 10.1007/s00227-009-1234-x
   Valverde Roldan A., 2010, Endangered Species Research, V12, P77, DOI 10.3354/esr00296
   Wallace B. P., 2013, Dermochelys coriacea (East Pacific Ocean subpopulation). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e.T46967807A46967809, DOI [10.2305/IUCN.UK.20132.RLTS.T46967807A46967809.en, DOI 10.2305/IUCN.UK.20132.RLTS.T46967807A46967809.EN]
   Weber SB, 2012, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V279, P1077, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2011.1238
   Wibbels T, 2003, CRC MAR BIOL SER, P103
   Yousefi M, 2019, CONTEMP PROBL ECOL+, V12, P394, DOI 10.1134/S1995425519040127
   Zanden HBV, 2014, MAR BIOL, V161, P585, DOI 10.1007/s00227-013-2361-y
NR 94
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 8
U2 8
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1354-1013
EI 1365-2486
J9 GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL
JI Glob. Change Biol.
PD AUG
PY 2024
VL 30
IS 8
AR e17447
DI 10.1111/gcb.17447
PG 10
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA A5T6H
UT WOS:001283158400001
PM 39098999
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Johnston, KK
   Dugan, JE
   Hubbard, DM
   Emery, KA
   Grubbs, MW
AF Johnston, Karina K.
   Dugan, Jenifer E.
   Hubbard, David M.
   Emery, Kyle A.
   Grubbs, Melodie W.
TI Using dune restoration on an urban beach as a coastal resilience
   approach
SO FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE beach grooming; foredune; remote sensing; vegetation zonation; sea level
   rise resilience; coastal adaptation; sediment dynamics
ID SEA-LEVEL RISE; SANDY BEACHES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; VEGETATION; SEDIMENT;
   IMPACTS; ISLAND; COMMUNITIES; CALIFORNIA; INVERTEBRATES
AB Coastal dunes are globally recognized as natural features that can be important adaptation approaches for climate change along urban and natural shores. We evaluated the recovery of coastal dunes on an intensively groomed urban beach in southern California over a six-year period after grooming was discontinued. Restoration actions were minimal and included installation of three sides of perimeter sand fencing, cessation of mechanical grooming and driving, and the addition of seeds of native dune plants. To track recovery, we conducted physical and biological surveys of the restoration site and an adjacent control site (groomed beach) using metrics including sand accretion, elevation, foredune and hummock formation, vegetation recovery, and wildlife use. Sediment accretion, elevation, and geomorphic complexity increased over time in the restoration site, largely in association with sand fencing and dune vegetation. A foredune ridge (maximum elevation increase of 0.9 m) and vegetated hummocks developed, along with a general increase in elevation across the restoration site (0.3 m). After six years, an estimated total volume of approximately 1,730 m(3) of sand had accreted in the restoration site and 540 m(3) of sand had accreted in the foredune ridge. Over the same period, more than a meter of sediment (vertical elevation change) accumulated along the perimeter sand fencing. Groomed control areas remained flat and uniform. The total cover of vegetation in the restoration site increased over time to a maximum of approximately 7% cover by the sixth year. No vegetation was observed on the groomed control site. Native plant species formed distinct zones across the restoration site beginning by the second year and increasing over time, with dune forming species aggregating closest to the ocean in association with the incipient foredune ridge. Ecological functions observed in the restoration area included presence of dune invertebrates, shorebird roosting, and use by a breeding federally threatened shorebird, the western snowy plover (Charadrius nivosus nivosus). Our findings on geomorphic and ecological responses of a pilot dune restoration on a heavily groomed urban beach provide new insights on the opportunities and expectations for restoring dunes as nature-based solutions for climate adaptation on urban shorelines.
C1 [Johnston, Karina K.; Dugan, Jenifer E.; Hubbard, David M.] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Marine Sci Inst, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA.
   [Emery, Kyle A.] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Geog, Los Angeles, CA USA.
   [Grubbs, Melodie W.] Morro Bay Natl Estuary Program, Morro Bay, CA USA.
C3 University of California System; University of California Santa Barbara;
   University of California System; University of California Los Angeles
RP Johnston, KK (corresponding author), Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Marine Sci Inst, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA.
EM KarinaJohnston@ucsb.edu
RI Fuentes, José/JZT-9323-2024
FU U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Metabolic Studio (Annenberg
   Foundation) [15-541]; University of Southern California Sea Grant
   Program [NOAA: NA22OAR4170104]; National Science Foundation [2126607,
   1458845]; Santa Barbara Coastal Long Term Ecological Research project
   [1232779, 1831937]
FX U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metabolic Studio (Annenberg
   Foundation; Grant 15-541) funded the initial implementation of the pilot
   restoration project. Research funding came from the University of
   Southern California Sea Grant Program (NOAA: NA22OAR4170104). KAE was
   funded by the National Science Foundation (OCE #2126607). The National
   Science Foundation also provided support to JED, DMH, and KAE including
   OCE #1458845 and the Santa Barbara Coastal Long Term Ecological Research
   project (OCE #1232779 and OCE#1831937).
CR Aerts JCJH, 2018, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1427, P1, DOI 10.1111/nyas.13917
   American Shore and Beach Preservation Association (ASBPA), 2022, US
   ANDERS FJ, 1987, ENVIRON GEOL WATER S, V9, P183, DOI 10.1007/BF02449950
   Arkema KK, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P913, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1944
   Barbour M.G., 1976, J BIOGEOGR, V3, P55, DOI [10.2307/3038099, DOI 10.2307/3038099]
   BARBOUR MG, 1977, B TORREY BOT CLUB, V104, P29, DOI 10.2307/2484662
   Barnard PL, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-94942-7
   Bejarano AC, 2016, ENVIRON POLLUT, V218, P709, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.065
   Lebbe TB, 2021, FRONT MAR SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2021.740602
   Bowen A. J., 1966, BUDGET LITTORAL SAND, P41
   Bridges T., 2015, 480 USA ENG RES DEV, P480
   Brown AC, 2002, ENVIRON CONSERV, V29, P62, DOI 10.1017/S037689290200005X
   Brown S., 2013, COASTAL RES LIB, V1000, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-5234-4_5, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5234-4_5]
   Bryant DB, 2019, COAST ENG, V152, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.103506
   Coastal Data Information Program, SANT MON BUOY WAV DA
   da Silva GM, 2010, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V120, P258, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.03.039
   DavidsonArnott R., 2019, Introduction to coastal processes and geomorphology, DOI [10.1017/9781108546126, DOI 10.1017/9781108546126]
   Defeo O, 2009, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V81, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2008.09.022
   Dugan JE, 2018, ESTUAR COAST, V41, pS180, DOI 10.1007/s12237-017-0254-x
   Dugan JE, 2003, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V58, P25, DOI 10.1016/S0272-7714(03)00045-3
   Dugan JE, 2008, MAR ECOL-EVOL PERSP, V29, P160, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0485.2008.00231.x
   Dugan JE, 2016, ECOSYSTEMS OF CALIFORNIA, P389
   Dugan JE, 2010, ESTUAR COAST, V33, P67, DOI 10.1007/s12237-009-9239-8
   Fink B H., 1990, Madrono, V37, P200
   Finkl C.W., 2013, Coastal Hazards, P3, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-5234-4, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5234-4]
   Fritz M, 2017, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_1
   Fryberger SG., 1979, US Geol Surv, V1052, P137
   Gittman RK, 2014, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V102, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.09.016
   Gonyo SB, 2023, COAST MANAGE, V51, P145, DOI 10.1080/08920753.2023.2186091
   Grifman P., 2020, Shore and Beach, V88, P39, DOI DOI 10.34237/1008834
   Griggs G., Rising Seas in California - An Update on Sea-Level Rise Science, DOI DOI 10.1142/9789811213960_0016
   Griggs G.B., 2005, SHORE BEACH, V73, P13
   Griggs G, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13162151
   Griggs G, 2019, J COASTAL RES, V35, P1051, DOI 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-19A-00007.1
   Griggs GB., 2018, Shore Beach, V86, P1
   Hanak E, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V111, P45, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0295-2
   Hesp P.A., 2013, Springer Series on Environmental Management, P67, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-33445-0_5
   Hilgendorf Z, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13030354
   Houser C, 2015, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V234, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.12.044
   Houser C, 2013, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V71, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.09.012
   Hubbard DM, 2014, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V150, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2013.06.017
   Itzkin M, 2020, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V352, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106995
   Jackson DWT, 1999, SEDIMENTOLOGY, V46, P517
   Jaramillo E, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V755, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142573
   JOHNSON AF, 1977, J BIOGEOGR, V4, P83, DOI 10.2307/3038131
   Johnston K. K., 2021, SANTA MONICA BEACH R, P118
   Kelly EW, 2021, GEOSCIENCES, V11, DOI 10.3390/geosciences11090358
   Kiddle GL, 2021, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2021.723166
   King P., 2004, SHORE BEACH, V72, P3
   King P. G., 2018, SHORE BEACH, V86, P45
   Konlechner T. M., 2014, DYNAMIQUES ENVIRONNE, V33, P141
   Lawlor P., 2022, HUMAN NATURE INTERAC, P417
   Liu JQ, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15041098
   Los Angeles Almanac, PREC DAT
   Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors Seasonal Sand Berm Protection Program, 2016, TECHN REP PREP NOBL, P41
   Manes S, 2023, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V235, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106487
   Martin K. L. M., 2022, SANDY BEACHES ENDANG
   McLachlan A., 2006, ECOLOGY SANDY SHORES, V2nd edn
   Mendoza-González G, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P2524, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12236
   Miller TE, 2015, AOB PLANTS, V7, DOI 10.1093/aobpla/plv003
   Miller TE, 2010, PLANT ECOL, V206, P97, DOI 10.1007/s11258-009-9626-z
   MORENOCASASOLA P, 1986, VEGETATIO, V65, P67, DOI 10.1007/BF00044876
   Morris RL, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P485, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0798-9
   Myers MR, 2019, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V182, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.104921
   ncei.noaa, NOAA CLIM DAT ONL
   Newkirk S., 2018, NATURAL INFRASTRUCTU
   Nordstrom KF, 2022, BEACH AND DUNE RESTORATION, 2 EDITION, P88
   Nordstrom KF, 2012, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V179, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.07.032
   Nordstrom KF, 2011, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V36, P779, DOI 10.1002/esp.2105
   Nordstrom KF, 2000, ENVIRON MANAGE, V25, P37, DOI 10.1007/s002679910004
   Orams MB, 2003, J COASTAL RES, P74
   Patsch K., 2006, Littoral Cells, Sand Budgets, and Beaches: Understanding California's Shoreline, P40
   Perez-Maqueo O., 2013, Restoration of Coastal Dunes, P289, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-33445-0_18
   Pinardo-Barco S, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V325, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116645
   Polade SD, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-11285-y
   Psuty N. P., 2013, RESTORATION COASTAL, P33, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-33445-0_18, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-33445-0_18]
   Runyan K, 2003, J COASTAL RES, V19, P336
   Schlacher TA, 2008, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V610, P345, DOI 10.1007/s10750-008-9426-9
   Schlacher TA, 2007, DIVERS DISTRIB, V13, P556, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00363.x
   Schlacher TA, 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V144, P322, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.036
   Schlacher TA, 2012, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V435, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.071
   Schooler NK, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105457
   Schooler NK, 2017, ECOL EVOL, V7, P4822, DOI 10.1002/ece3.3064
   Schroder K, 2022, FRONT MAR SCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2022.1052373
   Seabloom EW, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P824, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12078
   Stallins JA, 2005, ECOL COMPLEX, V2, P410, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2005.04.011
   Stallins JA, 2003, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V93, P13, DOI 10.1111/1467-8306.93102
   Suter-Burri K, 2013, AEOLIAN RES, V8, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.aeolia.2012.11.002
   Toft JD, 2021, ECOL ENG, V167, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106255
   United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2007, REC PLAN PAC COAST P, V2, P751
   Van der Biest K, 2017, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V149, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.10.005
   van der Wal D, 1998, J ARID ENVIRON, V39, P533, DOI 10.1006/jare.1997.0364
   Vitousek S, 2017, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V122, P1060, DOI 10.1002/2017JF004308
   Walker IJ, 2023, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V48, P143, DOI 10.1002/esp.5478
   Walker IJ, 2017, EARTH-SCI REV, V171, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.04.011
   Walker IJ, 2013, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V199, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.04.023
   Walker IJ, 2020, SANDY BEACH MORPHODY, P213
   Xuan TL, 2022, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V228, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106301
   Zarnetske PL, 2015, J R SOC INTERFACE, V12, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2015.0017
NR 99
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 3
U2 23
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-7745
J9 FRONT MAR SCI
JI Front. Mar. Sci.
PD JUN 19
PY 2023
VL 10
AR 1187488
DI 10.3389/fmars.2023.1187488
PG 17
WC Environmental Sciences; Marine & Freshwater Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Marine & Freshwater Biology
GA L0VT8
UT WOS:001020525600001
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Fan, X
   Yu, HR
   Tiando, DS
   Rong, YJ
   Luo, WX
   Eme, C
   Ou, SY
   Li, JF
   Liang, Z
AF Fan, Xin
   Yu, Haoran
   Tiando, Damien Sinonmatohou
   Rong, Yuejing
   Luo, Wenxu
   Eme, Chan
   Ou, Shengya
   Li, Jiangfeng
   Liang, Zhe
TI Impacts of Human Activities on Ecosystem Service Value in Arid and
   Semi-Arid Ecological Regions of China
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH
LA English
DT Article
DE ecosystem services value; human activities; dynamic mechanism; arid and
   semi-arid regions; special regression
ID GORGES RESERVOIR AREA; LAND-USE; LOESS PLATEAU; SOIL-EROSION;
   AGRICULTURE; SIMULATION
AB The quantitative and spatial-temporal variations in the characteristics of ecosystem value can be helpful to improve environmental protection and climate adaptation measures and adjust the balance between economic development and the ecological environment. The arid and semi-arid regions of China are undergoing the effects of climate change across the entire northern hemisphere. Their ecological environments are fragile and in conflict with anthropogenic activities, which significantly altered more ecosystems services in these regions. Therefore, estimating the effects of anthropogenic activities on ecosystem services is important for formulating ecological policy and regional environmental mitigation plans of these regions. This study employed the model of ecosystem service value (ESV) assessment and the bivariate spatial autocorrelation method to reveal the spatiotemporal variations in the characteristics of ecosystem value in the arid and semi-arid ecological regions of China and its interaction with human activities. Results showed that (1) the total value of ES of the study area increased from USD 487,807 billion in 2000 to USD 67,831,150 billion 2020; (2) the ES value provided by forest land first increased by 5.60% from 2000 to 2020; (3) the ESV provided by grassland showed an overall decline over the 20 years. Food and raw material production showed the lowest ES value, and climate regulation and soil conservation decreased from 2000 to 2020; (4) the index of human footprint patches decreased from 45.80% in 2000 to 17.63% in 2020, while the high and very high human footprint index areas increased significantly, mainly due to the rapid urbanization and improvement of railway networks in these areas. Spatially, the regions with high human footprint were mostly dispersed in the northeastern of China such as Shanxi and Gansu, whereas the regions with a low human footprint remained mainly located in the central and southwestern parts of China; (5) significant spatial dependencies between changes in ESV and the human footprint index were recorded. Our study could provide a scientific basis for ecosystem functions regulation and land development security in arid and semi-arid ecological regions.
C1 [Fan, Xin; Tiando, Damien Sinonmatohou; Eme, Chan; Li, Jiangfeng] China Univ Geosci Wuhan, Sch Publ Adm, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China.
   [Fan, Xin] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China.
   [Yu, Haoran; Liang, Zhe] Anhui Urbanizat Dev Res Ctr, Hefei 230022, Peoples R China.
   [Rong, Yuejing] Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China.
   [Rong, Yuejing] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
   [Luo, Wenxu] China Univ Geosci, Int Educ Coll, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China.
   [Ou, Shengya] Shaanxi Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Tourism, Xian 710119, Peoples R China.
C3 China University of Geosciences; Beijing Normal University; Chinese
   Academy of Sciences; Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences
   (RCEES); Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy of
   Sciences, CAS; China University of Geosciences; Shaanxi Normal
   University
RP Li, JF (corresponding author), China Univ Geosci Wuhan, Sch Publ Adm, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China.
EM worldwin2020@sina.com; watt2020521@163.com; damientiando90@gmail.com;
   yjrong_st@rcees.ac.cn; intlstudents@cug.edu.cn; emechan340@gmail.com;
   osy201705598@snnu.edu.cn; jfli@cug.edu.cn; liazhe_320@163.com
RI Li, Jiangfeng/N-5695-2014; Yu, Haoran/HHS-8869-2022
OI Ou, Shengya/0009-0008-9125-3586; Yu, Haoran/0000-0003-2912-9273
FU Natural Science Foundation of China [42001218]; State Key Laboratory of
   Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology [2021-KF-03]; Beijing
   Normal Univer-sity, China
FX FundingThis research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of
   China, grant number 42001218.The project was also supported by State Key
   Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology (2021-KF-03),
   Beijing Normal Univer-sity, China.
CR Anderson K, 2017, GEO-SPAT INF SCI, V20, P77, DOI 10.1080/10095020.2017.1333230
   ANSELIN L, 1988, ECON LETT, V28, P335, DOI 10.1016/0165-1765(88)90009-2
   ANSELIN L, 1988, GEOGR ANAL, V20, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1988.tb00159.x
   Arowolo AO, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V636, P597, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.277
   Assessment M.E., 2005, Assessment of Climate Change in the Southwest United States: A Report Prepared for the National Climate Assessment, VVolume 5
   Bechtel R.B., 2003, Handbook of Environmental Psychology
   Bin Q., 2020, J APPL ECOL, V31, P1660
   Bo W., 2021, ARID LAND GEOGR, V44, P552
   Bowen S., 2021, ECOL ECON, V37, P13
   Carter CA, 2012, APPL ECON PERSPECT P, V34, P1, DOI 10.1093/aepp/ppr047
   Chen WX, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13081552
   [陈万旭 Chen Wanxu], 2020, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V40, P5137
   Chen WX, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17103717
   Chen WX, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V669, P459, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.139
   Chen ZQ, 2021, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V13, P889, DOI 10.5194/essd-13-889-2021
   Costanza R, 1997, NATURE, V387, P253, DOI 10.1038/387253a0
   Fu BJ, 2011, ECOL COMPLEX, V8, P284, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2011.07.003
   Gong J, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14070818
   Guo XJ, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11202429
   Huang CB, 2020, GEOGR SUSTAIN, V1, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.geosus.2020.08.001
   Huang CB, 2019, CATENA, V175, P388, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2019.01.002
   Jiang W, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12177128
   Jiang WG, 2016, ECOL ENG, V88, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.12.014
   Juncheng C., 2019, J PEKING U, V55, P951
   Leh MDK, 2013, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V165, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2012.12.001
   Li JL, 2017, J GEOGR SCI, V27, P109, DOI 10.1007/s11442-017-1367-7
   Li YY, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V164, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105209
   Liao QP, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17218077
   Lifen X., 2012, Geogr. Res, V31, P1775
   Menzel S, 2013, AQUAT CONSERV, V23, P506, DOI 10.1002/aqc.2365
   REPETTO R, 1992, SCI AM, V266, P94, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican0692-94
   Sanderson EW, 2002, BIOSCIENCE, V52, P891, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0891:THFATL]2.0.CO;2
   Shuai Z., 2021, ARID LAND GEOGR, V44, P739
   Sun WY, 2014, CATENA, V121, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2014.05.009
   Tan Q, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9070488
   Thapa RB, 2008, LAND USE POLICY, V25, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.06.004
   Tiando DS, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18147416
   Tianyang H., 2009, EVALUATION FOREST EC, P53
   Tuo DF, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V633, P1032, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.237
   [谢高地 XIE Gao-di], 2008, [自然资源学报, Journal of Natural Resources], V23, P911
   [谢高地 Xie Gaodi], 2003, [自然资源学报, Journal of Natural Resources], V18, P189
   Xinliang X., 2018, CHINA MULTIPERIOD LA, DOI [10.12078/2018070201, DOI 10.12078/2018070201]
   Xiumei T., 2017, T CHIN SOC AGR MACH, V48, P149
   Yang M.Y., 2020, RESOUR SCI, V42, P2022
   Yuanjie D., 2020, ACTA ECOL SIN, V40, P6597
   Zengyun Z., 2019, J ECOL RURAL ENVIRON, V35, P1531
   Zhang Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18147352
   Zhang ZP, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105826
   Zhao DY, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13163161
   Zhao DY, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18168356
   Zhao J, 2020, FRONT PLANT SCI, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2020.573126
   Zheng WL, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V272, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123054
   Zhou J, 2016, CATENA, V137, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2015.08.015
NR 53
TC 16
Z9 17
U1 29
U2 181
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 1660-4601
J9 INT J ENV RES PUB HE
JI Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
PD NOV
PY 2021
VL 18
IS 21
AR 11121
DI 10.3390/ijerph182111121
PG 15
WC Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational
   Health
GA WY2JY
UT WOS:000719110300001
PM 34769640
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Niles, MT
   Mueller, ND
AF Niles, Meredith T.
   Mueller, Nathaniel D.
TI Farmer perceptions of climate change: Associations with observed
   temperature and precipitation trends, irrigation, and climate beliefs
SO GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE Global warming; Perceptions; Agriculture; Irrigation; Infrastructure;
   Beliefs
ID PERSONAL-EXPERIENCE; ADAPTATION; MITIGATION; ATTITUDES; WEATHER
AB How individuals perceive climate change is linked to whether individuals support climate policies and whether they alter their own climate-related behaviors, yet climate perceptions may be influenced by many factors beyond local shifts in weather. Infrastructure designed to control or regulate natural resources may serve as an important lens through which people experience climate, and thus may influence perceptions. Likewise, perceptions may be influenced by personal beliefs about climate change and whether it is human-induced. Here we examine farmer perceptions of historical climate change, how perceptions are related to observed trends in regional climate, how perceptions are related to the presence of irrigation infrastructure, and how perceptions are related to beliefs and concerns about climate change. We focus on the regions of Marlborough and Hawke's Bay in New Zealand, where irrigation is utilized on the majority of cropland. Data are obtained through analysis of historical climate records from local weather stations, interviews (n = 20), and a farmer survey (n = 490). Across both regions, no significant historical trends in annual precipitation and summer temperatures since 1980 are observed, but winter warming trends are significant at around 0.2-0.3 degrees C per decade. A large fraction of farmers perceived increases in annual rainfall despite instrumental records indicating no significant trends, a finding that may be related to greater perceived water availability associated with irrigation growth. A greater fraction of farmers perceived rainfall increases in Marlborough, where irrigation growth has been most substantial. We find those classes of farmers more likely to have irrigation were also significantly more likely to perceive an increase in annual rainfall. Furthermore, we demonstrate that perceptions of changing climate - regardless of their accuracy - are correlated with increased belief in climate change and an increased concern for future climate impacts. Those farmers that believe climate change is occurring and is human induced are more likely to perceive temperature increases than farmers who believe climate change is not occurring and is not human induced. These results suggest that perceptions are influenced by a variety of personal and environmental factors, including infrastructure, which may in turn alter decisions about climate adaptation. (C) 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
C1 [Niles, Meredith T.] Univ Vermont, Dept Nutr & Food Sci, 109 Carrigan Dr,350 Marsh Life Sci Bldg, Burlington, VT 05405 USA.
   [Niles, Meredith T.] Harvard Univ, Kennedy Sch Govt, Sustainabil Sci Program, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA.
   [Mueller, Nathaniel D.] Harvard Univ, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA.
   [Mueller, Nathaniel D.] Harvard Univ, Dept Organism & Evolutionary Biol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA.
C3 University of Vermont; Harvard University; Harvard University; Harvard
   University
RP Niles, MT (corresponding author), Univ Vermont, Dept Nutr & Food Sci, 109 Carrigan Dr,350 Marsh Life Sci Bldg, Burlington, VT 05405 USA.
EM mtniles@uvm.edu
RI Mueller, Nathan/E-5864-2010
OI Niles, Meredith/0000-0002-8323-1351
FU Harvard University Sustainability Science Program through the Italian
   Ministry of Land, Air and Water; National Science Foundation IGERT;
   National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship; Robert and
   Patricia Switzer Foundation; National Science Foundation (Hydrologic
   Sciences grant) [1521210]; Harvard University Center for the
   Environment; Directorate For Geosciences; Division Of Earth Sciences
   [1521210] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
FX We thank Rob Agnew, Margaret Brown, Robyn Dynes, Peter Huybers, Bill
   Kaye-Blake, Mark Lubell, and Stefan Siebert for helpful comments. We
   thank Josef Beautrais for information about potentially irrigable lands.
   Funding for MTN was provided by the Harvard University Sustainability
   Science Program through the Italian Ministry of Land, Air and Water, the
   National Science Foundation IGERT, the National Science Foundation
   Graduate Research Fellowship, and the Robert and Patricia Switzer
   Foundation. Funding for NDM was provided by the National Science
   Foundation (Hydrologic Sciences grant 1521210) and a fellowship from the
   Harvard University Center for the Environment.
CR Ajzen Theory of Planned Behavior, 1991, ORG BEHAV HUMAN DECI, V50, P179
   Akerlof K, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.006
   [Anonymous], 2012, Facts and Figures
   Arbuckle JG Jr, 2015, ENVIRON BEHAV, V47, P205, DOI 10.1177/0013916513503832
   Arbuckle JG, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V117, P943, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0707-6
   Bonfils C, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P13582, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0700144104
   Broomell SB, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V32, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.001
   Brulle RJ, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V114, P169, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y
   Christy JR, 2006, J CLIMATE, V19, P548, DOI 10.1175/JCLI3627.1
   Egan PJ, 2012, J POLIT, V74, P796, DOI 10.1017/S0022381612000448
   FOLLAND CK, 1995, INT J CLIMATOL, V15, P1195, DOI 10.1002/joc.3370151103
   Haden V, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0052882
   Hamilton LC, 2013, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V5, P112, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00048.1
   Harding KJ, 2012, J HYDROMETEOROL, V13, P1667, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-11-098.1
   Howe PD, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1488, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.014
   Jackson L., 2012, 50009009 CAL EN COMM, P153
   KUNDA Z, 1990, PSYCHOL B, V108
   LaDochy S, 2007, CLIM RES, V33, P159, DOI 10.3354/cr033159
   Lincoln Environmental, 2000, 43751 LINC ENV
   Lobell DB, 2008, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V35, DOI 10.1029/2008GL034145
   Lu Y., 2015, CLIM DYNAM, V117, P1
   Mueller N.D., 2015, Nature Climate Change
   Mueller ND, 2012, NATURE, V490, P254, DOI 10.1038/nature11420
   Mullan B., 2008, CLIMATE CHANGE EFFEC, P156
   Myers TA, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P343, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1754, 10.1038/nclimate1754]
   National Institute for Water and Atmosphere, 2008, CLIM CHANG PROJ NZ
   Niles MT, 2015, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V200, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2014.11.010
   Niles MT, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1752, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.005
   Porter JR, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P485
   Prokopy LS, 2015, ENVIRON MANAGE, V56, P492, DOI 10.1007/s00267-015-0504-2
   SCHEFFE H., 1999, The analysis of variance, V72
   Siebert S, 2015, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V19, P1521, DOI 10.5194/hess-19-1521-2015
   Siebert S., 2013, UPDATE DIGITAL GLOBA
   Sinclair TR, 2012, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V1, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2012.07.001
   Spence A, 2011, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V1, P46, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1059, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1059]
   Stern PaulC., 1999, VALUE BELIEF NORM TH, DOI 10.2307/2083693
   UN WWAP, 2012, UN WORLD WAT DEV REP
NR 37
TC 146
Z9 168
U1 2
U2 68
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0959-3780
EI 1872-9495
J9 GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG
JI Glob. Environ. Change-Human Policy Dimens.
PD JUL
PY 2016
VL 39
BP 133
EP 142
DI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.002
PG 10
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies; Geography
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography
GA DT0HS
UT WOS:000381165100013
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Caves, JK
   Bodner, GS
   Simms, K
   Fisher, LA
   Robertson, T
AF Caves, Jeremy K.
   Bodner, Gitanjali S.
   Simms, Karen
   Fisher, Larry A.
   Robertson, Tahnee
TI Integrating Collaboration, Adaptive Management, and Scenario-Planning:
   Experiences at Las Cienegas National Conservation Area
SO ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE biological planning; Bureau of Land Management; climate adaptation;
   collaboration; desert Southwest; ecological monitoring; implementing
   adaptive management; nested objectives; public lands management;
   scenario planning
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; TRANSITION MODELS; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; WATER;
   STATIONARITY; UNCERTAINTY; HYDROLOGY; SYSTEM; DEAD; FACE
AB There is growing recognition that public lands cannot be managed as islands; rather, land management must address the ecological, social, and temporal complexity that often spans jurisdictions and traditional planning horizons. Collaborative decision making and adaptive management (CAM) have been promoted as methods to reconcile competing societal demands and respond to complex ecosystem dynamics. We detail the experiences of land managers and stakeholders in using CAM at Las Cienegas National Conservation Area (LCNCA), a highly valued site under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The CAM process at Las Cienegas is marked by strong stakeholder engagement, with four core elements: (1) shared watershed goals with measurable resource objectives; (2) relevant and reliable scientific information; (3) mechanisms to incorporate new information into decision making; and (4) shared learning to improve both the process and management actions. The combination of stakeholder engagement and adaptive management has led to agreement on contentious issues, more innovative solutions, and more effective land management. However, the region is now experiencing rapid changes outside managers' control, including climate change, human population growth, and reduced federal budgets, with large but unpredictable impacts on natural resources. Although the CAM experience provides a strong foundation for making the difficult and contentious management decisions that such changes are likely to require, neither collaboration nor adaptive management provides a sufficient structure for addressing the externalities that drive uncontrollable and unpredictable change. As a result, LCNCA is exploring two specific modifications to CAM that may better address emerging challenges, including: (1) creating nested resource objectives to distinguish between those objectives that may be crucial to maintaining ecological resilience from those that may hinder a flexible response to climate change, and (2) incorporating scenario planning into CAM to explore how climate change may interact with other drivers and alter options for the future, to identify robust management actions, and to prioritize ecological monitoring efforts. The experiences at LCNCA demonstrate how collaboration and adaptive management can be used to improve social and environmental outcomes and, with modifications, may help address the full range of complexity and change that threatens to overwhelm even the best efforts to sustain public lands.
C1 [Caves, Jeremy K.] Stanford Univ, Dept Environm Earth Syst Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
   [Bodner, Gitanjali S.] Nature Conservancy, Tucson, AZ USA.
   [Simms, Karen] Univ Arizona, Bur Land Management, Tucson Field Off, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA.
   [Fisher, Larry A.] Univ Arizona, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA.
   [Robertson, Tahnee] Southwest Decis Resources, Tucson, AZ USA.
C3 Stanford University; Nature Conservancy; University of Arizona;
   University of Arizona
RP Caves, JK (corresponding author), Stanford Univ, Dept Environm Earth Syst Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
RI Rugenstein, Jeremy/I-4743-2015
OI Rugenstein, Jeremy/0000-0003-4123-3305
FU Nature Conservancy; NSF Graduate Research Fellowship; Bureau of Land
   Management; U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution
FX This project is an outgrowth of 20 years of hand-wringing, stumbling,
   celebration, and joy. On behalf of the many people who have a vested
   interest in the health of this landscape, the authors are grateful for
   all the camaraderie and hard work of the participants of SVPP and the
   Biological Planning Team, without whom this work would not have been
   possible. The authors wish to thank Carolyn Enquist, Greg Garfin, Dave
   Gori, Holly Hartmann, Rob Marshall, Maggie McCaffrey, Brian Powell,
   Marcos Robles, Ed Smith, Christine Turner, and Jeff Williamson for
   ongoing discussions about the intersection of climate adaptation,
   adaptive management, and scenario planning. We also thank Steve Cohn and
   Michael Schoon for providing thoughtful comments that significantly
   improved this manuscript. Thanks is also due to the U.S. Institute for
   Environmental Conflict Resolution for supporting JKC while working with
   the BLM and stakeholders on a paper about integrating climate change
   uncertainty into decision-cycles. Funding for this paper came from The
   Nature Conservancy, the Bureau of Land Management, and a NSF Graduate
   Research Fellowship to JKC.
CR Allen CD, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P660, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001
   [Anonymous], 246 RM USDA FOR SERV
   [Anonymous], PRELIMINARY REV ADAP
   [Anonymous], 2009, ADAPTIVE
   [Anonymous], 2004, EFFL LIM GUID NEW SO
   Armitage Derek., 2007, ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMEN, P1
   Armitage DR, 2009, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V7, P95, DOI 10.1890/070089
   Barnett TP, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P1080, DOI 10.1126/science.1152538
   Beier P., 2006, Arizona Missing Linkages: Santa Rita-Tumacacori Linkage Design
   Bestelmeyer BT, 2006, RESTOR ECOL, V14, P325, DOI 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00140.x
   Bestelmeyer BT, 2009, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V62, P1, DOI 10.2111/08-146
   BLM] Bureau of Land Management, 2009, BUR LAND MAN NAT NAT
   Bodner G., 2012, BIOD MAN MADR ARCH 3, P24
   Bota L., 1997, THESIS U ARIZONA TUC
   Bureau of Land Management, 2003, APPR LAS CIEN RES MA
   Childs C., 2013, ECOLOGY SOC IN PRESS, V18
   Christensen JH, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P847
   Christensen NL, 1996, ECOL APPL, V6, P665, DOI 10.2307/2269460
   Craig RK, 2010, HARVARD ENVIRON LAW, V34, P9
   Diffenbaugh NS, 2008, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V35, DOI 10.1029/2008GL035075
   Eddy F.W., 1983, CULTURAL ENV HIST CI
   Folke C, 2005, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V30, P441, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Fonseca J., 2008, AQUIFER MONITORING G
   Gori D., 2005, STATE LAS CIENEGAS 1
   Gori D., 2010, SW DESERT RESOURCES, P131
   Groffman PM, 2006, ECOSYSTEMS, V9, P1289, DOI 10.1007/s10021-006-0177-z
   GRUMBINE RE, 1994, CONSERV BIOL, V8, P27, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08010027.x
   Gunderson L., 1999, Ecology and Society, V3, P7
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Heller NE, 2009, BIOL CONSERV, V142, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.006
   Holling C.S., 1978, Adaptive environmental assessment and management
   Hughes K., 2010, NATL LANDSCAPE CONSE
   Johnson B.L., 1999, CONSERV ECOL, V3, DOI DOI 10.5751/ES-00136-030208
   Keith S. J., 1981, THESIS U ARIZONA TUC
   Knapp CN, 2011, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V64, P598, DOI 10.2111/REM-D-10-00188.1
   Knapp CN, 2011, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V64, P158, DOI 10.2111/REM-D-10-00047.1
   Knight E. L., 1996, THESIS U ARIZONA TUC
   Konieczki A. D., 2004, 20045148 USGS
   Koopman M. E., 2010, CLIMATE CHANGE PREPA
   Lawler JJ, 2010, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V8, P35, DOI 10.1890/070146
   Lempert RJ, 2000, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V45, P387, DOI 10.1023/A:1005698407365
   MacDonald GM, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P21256, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0909651107
   Mahmoud M, 2009, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V24, P798, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.11.010
   Majewski T., 2004, 0364 SRI EMP RANCH F
   Marshall RM, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011687
   McDowell NG, 2011, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V26, P523, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.003
   Meridian Institute, 2010, CAMNET ANN REND SUMM
   Millar CI, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P2145, DOI 10.1890/06-1715.1
   Milly PCD, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P573, DOI 10.1126/science.1151915
   Moir WH, 2001, ENVIRON MANAGE, V28, P141, DOI 10.1007/s002670010213
   National Park Service, 2012, AB US
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Parmesan C, 2006, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V37, P637, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
   Peterson GD, 2003, CONSERV BIOL, V17, P358, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01491.x
   Pima Association of Governments, 2000, SON DES CONS PLAN GI
   Pima County Board of Supervisors, 2011, PROT OUR LAND WAT HE
   Pima County Board of Supervisors, 1999, WAT RES SON DES CONS
   Plummer R, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14
   Polasky S, 2011, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V26, P398, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.04.007
   Powell B., 2010, Climate change and natural resources in Pima County: Anticipated effects and management challenges
   Seager R, 2007, SCIENCE, V316, P1181, DOI 10.1126/science.1139601
   Seager R, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P21277, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0910856107
   Serrat-Capdevila A, 2007, J HYDROL, V347, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.08.028
   Serrat-Capdevila A, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14
   Shindler B., 1999, Conservation Ecology, V3, P9
   Simms K., 2006, REPORT BIOL PLANNING
   Stankey GH, 2003, J FOREST, V101, P40
   Swanson E. H., 1951, THESIS U ARIZONA TUC
   Szaro RC, 1998, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V40, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00093-5
   Tiller R. L., 2012, SACATON RIPARIAN GRA
   Walters Carl, 1997, Conservation Ecology, V1, pUnpaginated
   WALTERS CJ, 1990, ECOLOGY, V71, P2060, DOI 10.2307/1938620
   Weeks D., 2011, Park Science, V28, P26
   Williams JW, 2007, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V5, P475, DOI 10.1890/070037
   York AM, 2011, INT J COMMONS, V5, P388
NR 75
TC 34
Z9 51
U1 1
U2 66
PU RESILIENCE ALLIANCE
PI WOLFVILLE
PA ACADIA UNIV, BIOLOGY DEPT, WOLFVILLE, NS B0P 1X0, CANADA
SN 1708-3087
J9 ECOL SOC
JI Ecol. Soc.
PY 2013
VL 18
IS 3
AR 43
DI 10.5751/ES-05749-180343
PG 19
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 232VA
UT WOS:000325521300035
OA Green Submitted, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Gsottbauer, E
   Gampfer, R
   Bernold, E
   Delas, AM
AF Gsottbauer, Elisabeth
   Gampfer, Robert
   Bernold, Elizabeth
   Delas, Anna-Mateja
TI Broadening the scope of loss and damage to legal liability: an
   experiment
SO CLIMATE POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; experiment; international cooperation; liability; social
   dilemma
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; RESPONSIBILITY; COOPERATION; EMISSIONS; DECISION
AB The 2015 Paris Agreement represents a historic deal in the form of a strong international response to address climate change. This outcome came as a surprise for some, as several controversial issues had been postponed from previous conferences, and were expected to complicate the talks in Paris. One related to the Warsaw International Mechanism on Loss and Damage (L&D), and potential legal remedies for L&D in the form of compensation payments. This issue had been particularly contentious with some developing countries advocating ideas for climate damage liability, which developed countries were unwilling to include in an agreement. Although the negotiations on L&D secured many positive outcomes, Decision 1/CP.21 adopting the Paris Agreement notes that there is no possibility of claiming liability and financial compensation for developing countries. This article, however, argues that, rather than triggering endless compensation claims disputes, a liability mechanism could actually serve as a commitment and reciprocity device, ultimately increasing global policy ambition. In this regard, this article reports the results of two experiments testing the effects of liability rules on the climate policy investment decisions of two players that differ in wealth and vulnerability. Results show that liability rules imposing a responsibility for precaution on both parties increase cooperation significantly, consequentially minimizing risk of L&D occurrence in the first place. Liability rules could thus not only help to address future losses, but also to drive global mitigation and adaptation ambition.POLICY RELEVANCEThe research results presented in this paper suggest that policymakers would be well advised to further intensify negotiations on a climate-related compensation mechanism beyond that already committed to in the Paris Agreement. Our findings show that a compensation mechanism that implements a rather simple negligence rule makes climate cooperation more attractive and rewarding, potentially leading rich and poor nations to boost their investments in mitigation and adaptation for climate protection. Thus, far from opening up a Pandora's box of endless compensation claims towards industrialized countries, a liability mechanism could make global climate cooperation more effective, and in the longer run also less costly.
C1 [Gsottbauer, Elisabeth] Univ Innsbruck, Inst Publ Finance, Univ Str 15, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
   [Gsottbauer, Elisabeth; Delas, Anna-Mateja] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Chair Econ, Clausiusstr 37, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
   [Gampfer, Robert] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Ctr Comparat & Int Studies, Zurich, Switzerland.
   [Bernold, Elizabeth] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Chair Decis Theory & Behav Game Theory, Zurich, Switzerland.
   [Bernold, Elizabeth] FehrAdvice & Partners, Zurich, Switzerland.
C3 University of Innsbruck; Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology Domain;
   ETH Zurich; Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology Domain; ETH Zurich;
   Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology Domain; ETH Zurich
RP Gsottbauer, E (corresponding author), Univ Innsbruck, Inst Publ Finance, Univ Str 15, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.; Gsottbauer, E (corresponding author), Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Chair Econ, Clausiusstr 37, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
EM elisabeth.gsottbauer@uibk.ac.at
OI Gsottbauer, Elisabeth/0000-0001-5849-8137
FU ERC [295456]; Chair of Economics, ETH Zurich; European Research Council
   (ERC) [295456] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
FX The research for this article was funded by the ERC Advanced Grant
   'Sources of Legitimacy in Global Environmental Governance' [grant number
   295456] and the Chair of Economics, ETH Zurich.
CR Angelova V, 2014, THEOR DECIS, V77, P531, DOI 10.1007/s11238-013-9405-0
   [Anonymous], EXPLAINING BEHAV PUB
   [Anonymous], 2007, 4 ASSESSMENT REPORT, DOI DOI 10.1038/446727A
   [Anonymous], 2000, Warming the world: economic models of globalwarming
   Balliet D, 2009, GROUP PROCESS INTERG, V12, P533, DOI 10.1177/1368430209105040
   Barrett S, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P14515, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1604989113
   Barrett S, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P17372, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1208417109
   Botzen WJW, 2008, CLIM POLICY, V8, P569, DOI 10.3763/cpol.2008.0539
   Bouwer LM, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P49, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00306.x
   Brick K, 2015, EUR ECON REV, V74, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.11.010
   Brick K, 2010, CLIM POLICY, V10, P543, DOI 10.3763/cpol.2010.0106
   Buhrmester M, 2011, PERSPECT PSYCHOL SCI, V6, P3, DOI 10.1177/1745691610393980
   Burton-Chellew MN, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V120, P815, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0856-7
   Camerer C., 1998, Experimental Economics, V1, P163
   Dellink R, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.07.009
   Eisenberg T, 2014, J EMPIR LEGAL STUD, V11, P301, DOI 10.1111/jels.12042
   Fischbacher U, 2010, AM ECON REV, V100, P541, DOI 10.1257/aer.100.1.541
   Füssel HM, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P597, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.009
   Gächter S, 2004, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V55, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.006
   Galbiati R, 2014, INT REV LAW ECON, V38, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.irle.2014.03.001
   Hayward T, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P843, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1615
   Heal G, 2014, REV ENV ECON POLICY, V8, P120, DOI 10.1093/reep/ret023
   Huq S., 2013, Nature Climate Change, V3, P947, DOI [DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2026, 10.1038/nclimate2026]
   IPCC, 2012, SPEC REP MAN RISKS E
   KAHNEMAN D, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P263, DOI 10.2307/1914185
   Lees E, 2017, CLIM POLICY, V17, P59, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2016.1197095
   Milinski M, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P2291, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0709546105
   Murphy RO, 2011, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V6, P771
   Paolacci G, 2010, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V5, P411
   PARKS CD, 1995, J CONFLICT RESOLUT, V39, P718, DOI 10.1177/0022002795039004006
   Posner R.A., 1972, Journal of Legal Studies, V1, P29, DOI [10.1086/467478, DOI 10.1086/467478]
   Rand DG, 2012, J THEOR BIOL, V299, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.03.004
   Rogelj J, 2016, NATURE, V534, P631, DOI 10.1038/nature18307
   SCHWARTZ GT, 1994, UCLA LAW REV, V42, P377
   Shum RY, 2014, INT ENVIRON AGREEM-P, V14, P83, DOI 10.1007/s10784-013-9231-4
   Suri S, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016836
   Tavoni A, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P11825, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1102493108
   Thöni C, 2012, J PUBLIC ECON, V96, P635, DOI 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.04.003
   Tol RSJ, 2009, J ECON PERSPECT, V23, P29, DOI 10.1257/jep.23.2.29
   Tol RSJ, 2004, ENERG POLICY, V32, P1109, DOI 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00075-2
   Tol RSJ, 2005, ENERG POLICY, V33, P2064, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.002
NR 41
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 1
U2 15
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1469-3062
EI 1752-7457
J9 CLIM POLICY
JI Clim. Policy
PY 2018
VL 18
IS 5
BP 600
EP 611
DI 10.1080/14693062.2017.1317628
PG 12
WC Environmental Studies; Public Administration
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public Administration
GA GA2MK
UT WOS:000428156600006
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Woldearegay, K
   Grum, B
   Hessel, R
   van Steenbergen, F
   Fleskens, L
   Yazew, E
   Tamene, L
   Mekonnen, K
   Reda, T
   Haftu, M
AF Woldearegay, Kifl
   Grum, Berhane
   Hessel, Rudi
   van Steenbergen, Frank
   Fleskens, Luuk
   Yazew, Eyasu
   Tamene, Lulseged
   Mekonnen, Kindu
   Reda, Teklay
   Haftu, Mulu
TI Watershed management, groundwater recharge and drought resilience: An
   integrated approach to adapt to rainfall variability in northern
   Ethiopia
SO INTERNATIONAL SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; Green and blue water; Landscape restoration; Water
   harvesting
ID SOIL-EROSION; TIGRAY HIGHLANDS; SEDIMENT YIELD; LAND-USE; CONSERVATION
   MEASURES; HARVESTING TECHNIQUES; STONE BUNDS; CATCHMENT; DEGRADATION;
   KNOWLEDGE
AB Rainfall variability coupled with poor land and water management is contributing to food insecurity in many sub-Saharan African countries such as Ethiopia. To address such challenges, various efforts have been implemented in Ethiopia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term impacts of different soil and water conservation and water harvesting interventions on groundwater and drought resilience of the Gule watershed, northern Ethiopia. The study involved: (i) documentation of the approaches followed and the technologies implemented in Gule since the 1990s, (ii) monitoring the hydrological effects of the interventions for ten years, and (iii) evaluation of the effects of the interventions on groundwater (level and quality), spring discharge and suspended sediment concentration (SSC) in runoff. Results showed that interventions were implemented at different stages and scales. As a result of the interventions, the watershed was transformed into a landscape resilient to rainfall variability: (a) dry shallow groundwater wells have become productive and the level of water in wells has raised, (b) the groundwater quality has improved, (c) SSC in high floods has reduced by up to 65%, (d) discharge of existing springs has increased by up to 73% and new springs have started to emerge. Due to improved water availability, irrigated land has increased from less than 3.5 ha before 2002 to 166 ha in 2019. Communities have remained water-secure during an extreme drought in 2015/2016. Implementation of watershed management practices has transformed the landscape to be resilient to rainfall variability in a semi-arid environment: a lesson for adaptation to climate variability and change in similar environments. (c) 2023 International Research and Training Center on Erosion and Sedimentation, China Water and Power Press, and China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY
C1 [Woldearegay, Kifl] Mekelle Univ, Sch Earth Sci, POB 231, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
   [Grum, Berhane] Mekelle Univ, Mekelle Inst Technol Mekelle, Sch Civil Engn, Mekelle 3185, Ethiopia.
   [Hessel, Rudi] Wageningen Environm Res, Soil Water & Land Use Team, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands.
   [van Steenbergen, Frank] MetaMeta Res, Postelstr 2, NL-5211 EA sHertogenbosch, Netherlands.
   [Fleskens, Luuk] Wageningen Univ, Soil Phys & Land Management Grp, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands.
   [Yazew, Eyasu] Mekelle Univ, Dept Land Resource Management & Environm Protect, POB 231, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
   [Tamene, Lulseged] Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
   [Mekonnen, Kindu] Int Livestock Res Inst ILRI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
   [Reda, Teklay; Haftu, Mulu] Wukro St Mary Inst, Wukro, Tigray, Ethiopia.
C3 Mekelle University; Mekelle University; Wageningen University &
   Research; Wageningen University & Research; Mekelle University;
   Alliance; International Center for Tropical Agriculture - CIAT; CGIAR;
   International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
RP Woldearegay, K (corresponding author), Mekelle Univ, Sch Earth Sci, POB 231, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
EM kiflewold@gmail.com; biire2005@yahoo.com; rudi.hessel@wur.nl;
   fvansteenbergen@metameta.nl; fleskens@wur.nl; eyasuet@yahoo.com;
   LT.Desta@CGIAR.ORG; k.mekonnen@cgiar.org; teklay258@gmail.com;
   muhaftu2013@gmail.com
RI Fleskens, Luuk/B-4004-2009
OI Grum, Berhane/0000-0003-4087-9366; Woldemariam, Kifle
   Woldearegay/0000-0003-3208-3544; Fleskens, Luuk/0000-0001-6843-0910
FU European Union [FP7/2007-2013, 265570]; Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE)
   programme of the CGIAR; United States Agency for International
   Development (USAID), United States Government's Feed the Future
   Initiative; Ferster Foundation (Switzerland); EU-IFAD project under
   CCAFS
FX We are grateful to the European Union for funding this research through
   the European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) , under
   grant agreement n degrees 265570 (WAHARA project) in the years
   2013-2016. The authors would also like to acknowledge the following
   organizations for the financial support for the research carried out
   during 2017-2019: (a) The Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE) programme of
   the CGIAR, (b) Africa RISING which is a programme financed by the United
   States Agency for International Development (USAID) as part of the
   United States Government's Feed the Future Initiative, (c) Ferster
   Foundation (Switzerland) , and (d) EU-IFAD project under CCAFS. The
   following organizations are highly acknowledged for all the support
   during the watershed management implementation and research: TBoARD
   (Tigray Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Development) , Wukro Saint Mary
   College and Relief Society of Tigray (REST) . The content of this paper
   is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily
   represent the of ficial views of the financiers and organizations who
   supported this research. We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers
   for their constructive comments and suggestions on the manuscript.
CR [Anonymous], 2009, RAINWATER HARVESTING
   Awulachew S.B., 2006, Proceeding of a MoARD/MoWR/USAID/IWMI symposium and exhibition. 7-9 March 2006, Addis Ababa, P23
   Babulo B, 2008, AGR SYST, V98, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2008.06.001
   Bishaw B., 2001, Journal of North African Studies, V8, P7
   BOUWER H, 1976, WATER RESOUR RES, V12, P423, DOI 10.1029/WR012i003p00423
   Bouwer H, 2002, HYDROGEOL J, V10, P121, DOI 10.1007/s10040-001-0182-4
   Burney JA, 2012, WORLD DEV, V40, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.05.007
   Cai ZS, 2016, J HYDROL, V535, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.066
   Calow R. C., 1997, International Journal of Water Resources Development, V13, P241, DOI 10.1080/07900629749863
   Chernet T., 1993, HYDROGEOLOGY ETHIOPI
   Ciampalini R, 2012, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V146, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2011.11.006
   Cobbing J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P597, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.024
   CoSAERT (Commission for Sustainable Agriculture and Environmental Rehabilitation of Tigray), 2002, Tech. Rep., P65
   de Vries JJ, 2002, HYDROGEOL J, V10, P5, DOI 10.1007/s10040-001-0171-7
   Descheemaeker K, 2006, GEODERMA, V132, P291, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.04.027
   Desta L., 2005, Community-based participatory watershed development: A Guideline
   Dillon P., 2022, Managed Aquifer Recharge: Overview and Governance
   Driscoll F.G., 1986, GROUNDWATER WELLS, V2nd, P1089
   EGS (Ethiopian Geological Survey), 2002, Hydrogeological map of northern Ethiopia
   EIGS (Ethiopian Institute of Geological Survey), 1996, Groundwater assessment report for selected sites in Tigray region, P48
   Embaye TAG, 2020, SUST WAT RESOUR MAN, V6, DOI 10.1007/s40899-020-00435-2
   ENMSA (Ethiopian National Meteorology Service Agency), 2020, Daily rainfall data for Wukro station for the years 1995 to 2019
   FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2012, FAO Technical Reports, V38
   Fleskens L, 2014, ENVIRON MANAGE, V54, P1005, DOI 10.1007/s00267-013-0202-x
   Gebremichael D, 2005, SOIL USE MANAGE, V21, P287, DOI 10.1079/SUM2005321
   Grey D, 2007, WATER POLICY, V9, P545, DOI 10.2166/wp.2007.021
   Grum B, 2017, CATENA, V159, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2017.07.018
   Grum B, 2016, AGR WATER MANAGE, V173, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.04.018
   Guy H.P., 1977, LAB THEORY METHODS S
   Haregeweyn N, 2012, ENVIRON MANAGE, V50, P1219, DOI 10.1007/s00267-012-9952-0
   Haskett JD, 2019, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V7, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00146
   Hassanli AM, 2010, ENVIRON SCI ENG TECH, P11
   Hazen A., 1911, T ASCE, V73, P199, DOI DOI 10.1061/TACEAT.0002320
   Herweg K, 1999, CATENA, V36, P99, DOI 10.1016/S0341-8162(99)00004-1
   Hu Q, 2013, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V5, P6026, DOI 10.3390/rs5116026
   Huang TM, 2020, J HYDROL, V583, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124532
   Hunting, 1976, Tigray rural development study. Phase two
   Intergov Panel Clim Chg, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139177245
   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2019, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.024
   Inversin A. R., 1986, Micro-hydropower source book. A practical guide to design and implementation in developing countries, P285
   KAMARA CS, 1992, AGROFOREST SYST, V18, P17, DOI 10.1007/BF00114814
   Kazmin V., 1975, Bulletin, V2
   Kazmin V., 1972, Geological map of Ethiopia (1:2,000,000 scale)
   Kessler J., 1974, Drainage principles and applications, V16, pIII
   Kilvington M., 2014, Social learning review
   Kruseman G. P., 1994, Analysis and evaluation of pumping test data, V47, P377
   Lambin EF, 2000, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V82, P321, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00235-8
   Lasage R, 2015, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V20, P317, DOI 10.1007/s11027-013-9493-8
   Lerner D.N., 1990, Groundwater Recharge: a Guide to Understanding and Estimating Natural Recharge
   Liniger H., 2007, Where the Land is Greener. Case studies and analysis of soil and water conservation initiatives worldwide (WOCAT)
   Lohman S.W., 1972, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, V708, P70
   Mahdi Osman Mahdi Osman, 2001, Journal of Soils and Sediments, V1, P117, DOI 10.1007/BF02987717
   Mehari A, 2007, COMMUNITY-BASED WATER LAW AND WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REFORM IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, P114, DOI 10.1079/9781845933265.0114
   Meinzer O. E., 1923, 494 USGS
   Mekdaschi R., 2013, Water harvesting: Guidelines to good practice
   Mekuria W, 2011, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V75, P246, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2010.0176
   Mohr P., 1988, CONTINENTAL FLOOD BA, DOI [10.1007/978-94-015-7805-9_3, DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-7805-9_3]
   Mohr P., 1967, B GEOPHYSICAL OBSERV, V10, P79
   Munshi K, 2008, HBK ECON, V9, P3085, DOI 10.1016/S1573-4471(07)04048-X
   Negusse T, 2013, MOMONA ETHIOP J SCI, V5, P117
   Nyssen J, 2004, EARTH-SCI REV, V64, P273, DOI 10.1016/S0012-8252(03)00078-3
   Nyssen J, 2010, HYDROL PROCESS, V24, P1880, DOI 10.1002/hyp.7628
   Nyssen J, 2009, Z GEOMORPHOL, V53, P171, DOI 10.1127/0372-8854/2009/0053-0171
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2008, GLOBAL GOV, V14, P419, DOI 10.1163/19426720-01404003
   POSCHEN P, 1986, AGROFOREST SYST, V4, P129, DOI 10.1007/BF00141545
   Quilis RO, 2009, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V34, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2008.06.057
   REST (Relief Society of Tigray), 2012, A technical report for the design of spate diversions and check-dam ponds in Gule watershed, P29
   Rockström J, 2010, AGR WATER MANAGE, V97, P543, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.09.009
   Ryan C, 2016, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V16, P2087, DOI 10.1007/s10113-016-0938-y
   Sanchez PA, 2002, SCIENCE, V295, P2019, DOI 10.1126/science.1065256
   Schwilch G, 2012, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V107, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.023
   Stigter TY, 2023, HYDROGEOL J, V31, P7, DOI 10.1007/s10040-022-02554-w
   Stocking M., 1992, Dryland networks programme. Issues paper, V34
   Stringer LC, 2007, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V18, P99, DOI 10.1002/ldr.760
   Tamene L, 2006, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V31, P1364, DOI 10.1002/esp.1338
   Tamene L., 2019, Africa RISING Technical Report, P35
   Tamene Lulseged, 2011, Lakes & Reservoirs Research and Management, V16, P293, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1770.2011.00489.x
   Taye G, 2015, Z GEOMORPHOL, V59, P477, DOI 10.1127/zfg/2015/0166
   Taylor R., 2022, Groundwater making the invisible visible; the united nations world water development report
   Taylor RG, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P322, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1744, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1744]
   TBoARD (Tigray Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Development), 2017, Annual performance report of the TBoARD for the year 2015/2016
   TBoARD (Tigray Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Development), 2011, Annual performance report of the TBoARD for the year 2010/2011
   TBoARD (Tigray Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Development), 2019, Annual performance report of the TBoARD for the year 2018/2019
   TBoWR (Tigray Bureau of Water Resources), 2010, Groundwater well drilling data for eastern zone
   Teka K, 2020, INT SOIL WATER CONSE, V8, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.iswcr.2020.06.007
   Thomas R, 2018, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V29, P3272, DOI 10.1002/ldr.3080
   Tuinhof A., 2012, Profit from Storage: The Costs and Benefits of Water Buffering, V3R, P86
   Van Steenbergen F., 2018, Rainwater-smart agriculture in arid and semi-arid areas, P121, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-66239-8_7
   Vohland K, 2009, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V131, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2009.01.010
   WAHARA (Water Harvesting for Rainfed Africa), 2013, WAHARA Report Number 15
   Wilby RL, 2010, WEATHER, V65, P180, DOI 10.1002/wea.543
   Woldearegay K., 2015, WAHARA Scientific Report number 28, P30
   Woldearegay K., 2009, A Technical Report, P28
   Woldearegay K., 2017, MEK U RES REV DAY JU
   Woldearegay K., 1995, A technical report, P65
   Woldearegay K., 2015, INT C IMPR FOOD SEC
   Woldearegay K., 2018, Rainwater-Smart agriculture for food security, poverty alleviation and climate resilience in arid and semi-arid regions, P37, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-66239-8_3.RAINWATER-SMARTAGRICULTUREINARIDANDSEMI-ARIDAREAS
   Woldearegay K., 2006, P HIGHL 2006 S SEPT
   Woldearegay K., 2015, P IRF EUR CENTR AS R, P15
   Woldearegay K, 2015, ENGINEERING GEOLOGY FOR SOCIETY AND TERRITORY, VOL 3: RIVER BASINS, RESERVOIR SEDIMENTATION AND WATER RESOURCES, P505, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-09054-2_103
   Yaekob T, 2022, RENEW AGR FOOD SYST, V37, pS73, DOI 10.1017/S1742170520000010
   Yifru BA, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13115905
NR 102
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 5
U2 5
PU KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
PI BEIJING
PA 16 DONGHUANGCHENGGEN NORTH ST, Building 5, Room 411, BEIJING, DONGCHENG
   DISTRICT 100009, PEOPLES R CHINA
SN 2095-6339
EI 2589-059X
J9 INT SOIL WATER CONSE
JI Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res.
PD SEP
PY 2024
VL 12
IS 3
BP 663
EP 683
DI 10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.08.009
EA JUN 2024
PG 21
WC Environmental Sciences; Soil Science; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Agriculture; Water Resources
GA ZC7O8
UT WOS:001273160000001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Hu, ZY
   Wang, GX
   Sun, XY
   Huang, KW
   Song, CL
   Li, Y
   Sun, SQ
   Sun, JY
   Lin, S
AF Hu, Zhaoyong
   Wang, Genxu
   Sun, Xiangyang
   Huang, Kewei
   Song, Chunlin
   Li, Yang
   Sun, Shouqin
   Sun, Juying
   Lin, Shan
TI Biological factor controls the variations in water use efficiency of an
   alpine meadow during the growing season in a permafrost region of the
   Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
SO AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Evapotranspiration; Gross primary productivity; Drought; Precipitation;
   High altitude
ID GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTION; TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS; CLIMATE-CHANGE;
   SPATIOTEMPORAL PATTERNS; CARBON FLUX; RESPONSES; VARIABILITY;
   GRASSLANDS; VEGETATION; EXCHANGES
AB The alpine meadow located in permafrost is crucial for ecosystem services of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), which is experiencing precipitation changes in most areas. Water use efficiency (WUE) can quantify the inextricable link between carbon assimilation and water loss in terrestrial ecosystems. However, the temporal variations in WUE and its driving factors across different precipitation years still need to be clarified in alpine meadows on the QTP. Therefore, 4-year carbon and water flux data were used to elucidate the mechanisms behind seasonal and interannual variations in WUE of an alpine meadow in the hinterland of the QTP. Noticeable seasonal variations in WUE were observed during the studied period, with the highest value (1.38 +/- 0.38 g C kg(-1) H2O) occurring during the mid-growing season (MG, starting around 166 DOY), approximately 2 and 3 times those during the late-growing season (LG, starting around 256 DOY and ending around 282 DOY) and earlygrowing season (EG, starting around 140 DOY), respectively. Standardized total effects in the structural equation models from NDVI to WUE were highest in all seasons, indicating that NDVI was the primary controlling factor for daily WUE variations. Additionally, energy factors (temperature and solar radiation) also significantly influenced daily WUE variations. The highest mean daily WUE (1.23 +/- 0.65 g C kg(-1) H2O) was in the mild dry year (2016). However, no significant differences were noted in mean daily WUE in severe dry (2015) and wet (2019) years compared to the normal year (2020) during GS. This can be attributed to the varying sensitivity of carbon assimilation and water loss to biotic and abiotic changes across divergent precipitation years, with WUE exhibiting a greater sensitive to gross primary productivity than to evapotranspiration. These findings suggest that alpine meadows have endured in its harsh environment and have adapted to climatic fluctuations through long-term evolution.
C1 [Hu, Zhaoyong; Wang, Genxu; Sun, Xiangyang; Song, Chunlin; Li, Yang; Sun, Shouqin; Sun, Juying; Lin, Shan] Sichuan Univ, Coll Water Resource & Hydropower, State Key Lab Hydraul & Mt River Engn, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China.
   [Huang, Kewei] Planning Design & Res Co Ltd, Hubei Key Lab Basin Water Secur, Changjiang Survey, Wuhan 430010, Peoples R China.
C3 Sichuan University
RP Lin, S (corresponding author), Sichuan Univ, Coll Water Resource & Hydropower, State Key Lab Hydraul & Mt River Engn, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China.
EM linshan@scu.edu.cn
RI Sun, Shou-Qin/AAC-5884-2020; Hu, Zhaoyong/HHD-1840-2022; Song,
   Chunlin/AGU-3084-2022
OI Huang, Kewei/0000-0001-8048-1112; Song, Chunlin/0000-0003-3627-2350; Hu,
   Zhaoyong/0000-0003-0409-5126
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [U2240226, 42201146];
   National Key Research and Development Program of China [2022YFC3201702];
   Sanjiangyuan National Park Joint Research Program of Chinese Academy of
   Sciences; People's Government of Qinghai Province [LHZX-2020-10-3];
   Science and Technology Project of Sichuan Province [2022NSFSC1001]
FX This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation
   of China (U2240226) , National Key Research and Development Program of
   China (2022YFC3201702) , National Natural Science Foundation of China
   (42201146) , Sanjiangyuan National Park Joint Research Program of
   Chinese Academy of Sciences and The People's Government of Qinghai
   Province (LHZX-2020-10-3) and Science and Technology Project of Sichuan
   Province (2022NSFSC1001) .
CR Anav A, 2015, REV GEOPHYS, V53, P785, DOI 10.1002/2015RG000483
   Bai YJ, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105932
   Baldocchi D, 2021, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V27, P359, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15414
   Beer C, 2009, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V23, DOI 10.1029/2008GB003233
   Campos GEP, 2013, NATURE, V494, P349, DOI 10.1038/nature11836
   Chen H, 2022, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V3, P701, DOI 10.1038/s43017-022-00344-2
   Chen XP, 2017, ECOL ENG, V107, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.07.018
   Cheng M, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107682
   Chu XJ, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V249, P286, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.11.002
   Cooley SS, 2022, NAT PLANTS, V8, P341, DOI 10.1038/s41477-022-01131-z
   Du MY, 2004, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V41, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2004.01.010
   Gang CC, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V67, P788, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.049
   Ganjurjav H, 2020, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V287, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107943
   Ganjurjav H, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep23356
   Gocic M, 2016, ADV METEOROL, V2016, DOI 10.1155/2016/7912357
   Grossiord C, 2020, NEW PHYTOL, V226, P1550, DOI 10.1111/nph.16485
   Guo N, 2019, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V284, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2019.106593
   He HL, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V119, P466, DOI 10.1002/2013JG002449
   He SY, 2015, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V26, P468, DOI 10.1002/ldr.2358
   Helbig M, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P555, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0763-7
   Hu ZY, 2024, J PLANT ECOL, V17, DOI 10.1093/jpe/rtae002
   Hu ZM, 2008, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V14, P1609, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01582.x
   Huang HX, 2011, SCI COLD ARID REG, V3, P455, DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1226.2011.00455
   Huang MT, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P2165, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13180
   Immerzeel WW, 2010, SCIENCE, V328, P1382, DOI 10.1126/science.1183188
   Ito A, 2012, J HYDROMETEOROL, V13, P681, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-10-05034.1
   Ji ZX, 2022, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02090
   Jin JX, 2017, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/rs9070664
   Kljun N, 2015, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V8, P3695, DOI 10.5194/gmd-8-3695-2015
   Kong DD, 2022, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V13, P1508, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.13870
   Kong DD, 2020, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V125, DOI 10.1029/2020JG005636
   Li HQ, 2019, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V268, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.01.013
   Li Y, 2018, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V123, P2429, DOI 10.1029/2018JG004482
   Lin S, 2023, AGR WATER MANAGE, V289, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108571
   Lin S, 2020, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V125, DOI 10.1029/2020JD032642
   Lin S, 2019, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V124, P1132, DOI 10.1029/2018JG004789
   Liu D, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V249, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.11.034
   Liu W, 2021, J HYDROL, V598, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126464
   Liu YB, 2015, SCI REP-UK, V5, DOI 10.1038/srep13799
   Ma N, 2022, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V127, DOI 10.1029/2022JD036919
   Ma N, 2015, J HYDROL, V529, P980, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.013
   Markus KA, 2012, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V19, P509, DOI 10.1080/10705511.2012.687667
   Massmann A, 2019, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V11, P3305, DOI 10.1029/2019MS001790
   Mauder M, 2013, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V169, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.006
   Peters W, 2018, NAT GEOSCI, V11, P744, DOI 10.1038/s41561-018-0212-7
   Pithan F, 2010, SCIENCE, V330, P584, DOI [10.1126/science.330.6004.584-b, 10.1126/science.330.6004.585-a]
   Pnevmatikos JD, 2006, METEOROL APPL, V13, P331, DOI 10.1017/S1350482706002350
   Puma MJ, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V118, P14, DOI 10.1029/2012JG002088
   Reichstein M, 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V11, P1424, DOI [10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001002.x, 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001010.x]
   Seddon AWR, 2016, NATURE, V531, P229, DOI 10.1038/nature16986
   Song CL, 2020, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V290, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108021
   Sun S., 2023, Water Resour Res, V59, pe2022WR033228
   Twine TE, 2000, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V103, P279, DOI 10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00123-4
   Wang GX, 2008, HYDROL PROCESS, V22, P3310, DOI 10.1002/hyp.6913
   Wang GX, 2020, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V125, DOI 10.1029/2019JD031799
   Wang LM, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V727, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138306
   Wang X, 2023, CATENA, V222, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106874
   Wang YY, 2020, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V64, P1183, DOI 10.1007/s00484-020-01892-2
   WEBB EK, 1980, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V106, P85, DOI 10.1002/qj.49710644707
   Wilczak JM, 2001, BOUND-LAY METEOROL, V99, P127, DOI 10.1023/A:1018966204465
   Wu QB, 2010, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V72, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.03.001
   Wu XC, 2019, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V124, P2174, DOI 10.1029/2018JG004873
   Wutzler T, 2018, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V15, P5015, DOI 10.5194/bg-15-5015-2018
   Xue BL, 2015, ECOSPHERE, V6, DOI 10.1890/ES14-00416.1
   Yao TD, 2019, B AM METEOROL SOC, V100, P423, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0057.1
   Yu GR, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V177, P927, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02316.x
   Yue SY, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abcb36
   Zhang FW, 2018, ECOHYDROLOGY, V11, DOI 10.1002/eco.1925
   Zhang Q, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108483
   Zhang T, 2015, EUR J SOIL BIOL, V71, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2015.10.004
   Zhao AZ, 2020, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V140, P559, DOI 10.1007/s00704-020-03103-9
   Zhao D, 2022, CLIM DYNAM, V59, P1939, DOI 10.1007/s00382-022-06189-1
   Zhao TT, 2022, ECOHYDROLOGY, V15, DOI 10.1002/eco.2360
   Zhuang Q, 2010, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V19, P649, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00559.x
NR 74
TC 1
Z9 2
U1 16
U2 24
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0378-3774
EI 1873-2283
J9 AGR WATER MANAGE
JI Agric. Water Manage.
PD MAY 1
PY 2024
VL 296
AR 108811
DI 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108811
EA APR 2024
PG 10
WC Agronomy; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Water Resources
GA PX0A6
UT WOS:001217250700001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Huffman, MA
   Kumara, R
   Kawamoto, Y
   Jayaweera, PM
   Bardi, M
   Nahallage, CAD
AF Huffman, Michael A.
   Kumara, Raveendra
   Kawamoto, Yoshi
   Jayaweera, Prasad M.
   Bardi, Massimo
   Nahallage, Charmalie A. D.
TI What makes a long tail short? Testing Allen's rule in the toque macaques
   of Sri Lanka
SO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Allen's rule; elevation; morphometrics; Sri Lanka; tail length; toque
   macaque
ID MACACA-MULATTA; BILL SIZE; BODY-SIZE; FASCICULARIS; BERGMANNS; LENGTH;
   TEMPERATURE; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; PRIMATES; COLOR
AB Allen's rule (1877) predicts ecogeographical anatomical variation in appendage proportions as a function of body temperature regulation. This phenomenon has been tested in a variety of animal species. In macaques, relative tail length (RTL) is one of the most frequently measured appendages to test Allen's rule. These studies have relied on museum specimens or the invasive and time-consuming capturing of free-ranging individuals. To augment sample size and lessen these logistical limitations, we designed and validated a novel noninvasive technique using digitalized photographs processed using LibreCAD, an open-source 2D-computer-aided design (CAD) application. This was used to generate pixelated measurements to calculate an RTL equivalent, the Tail to Trunk Index (TTI) = (tail [tail base to anterior tip] pixel count/trunk [neck to tail base] pixel count). The TTI of 259 adult free-ranging toque macaques (Macaca sinica) from 36 locations between 7 and 2,087 m above sea level (m.a.s.l.) was used in the analysis. Samples were collected from all three putative subspecies (M. s. sinica, aurifrons, and opisthomelas), at locations representing all altitudinal climatic zones where they are naturally distributed. These data were used to test whether toque macaque tail length variation across elevation follows Allen's rule, predicting that RTL decreases with increasing elevation and lower temperature. Our results strongly supported this prediction. There was also a statistically significant, negative correlation between elevation and annual average temperature. The best predictor for the TTI index was elevation. Significant subspecies differences in RTL are linked in part to their ecological and altitudinal niche separation, but overall the variation is seen as the species' adaptation to climate. The method developed for the quick morphometric assessment of relative body proportions, applicable for use on unhabituated free-ranging animals, widens the range of materials available for research studying morphological characteristics and their evolution in primates.
C1 [Huffman, Michael A.] Primate Res Inst, Dept Ecol & Social Behav, Kanrin 41-2, Inuyama, Aichi 4848506, Japan.
   [Kumara, Raveendra; Nahallage, Charmalie A. D.] Univ Sri Jayewardenepura, Dept Anthropol, Gangodawila, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
   [Kawamoto, Yoshi] Nippon Vet & Life Sci Univ, Fac Vet Sci, Lab Wildlife Med, Musashino, Tokyo, Japan.
   [Kawamoto, Yoshi] Kyoto Univ, Primate Res Inst, Ctr Human Evolut Modeling Res, Inuyama, Aichi, Japan.
   [Jayaweera, Prasad M.] Univ Sri Jayewardenepura, Dept Comp Sci, Gangodawila, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
   [Bardi, Massimo] Randolph Mason Coll, Dept Psychol, Ashland, VA USA.
C3 University Sri Jayewardenepura; Nippon Veterinary & Life Science
   University; Kyoto University; University Sri Jayewardenepura
RP Huffman, MA (corresponding author), Primate Res Inst, Dept Ecol & Social Behav, Kanrin 41-2, Inuyama, Aichi 4848506, Japan.
EM huffman.michael.8n@kyoto-u.jp
OI Jayaweera, Prasad/0000-0002-8018-8757; Nahallage,
   Charmalie/0000-0002-2576-0255
FU Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [22580349, 23570120];
   Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Ministry of
   Environment, Japan [D-1007]
FX Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Grant/Award Number:
   Research Grants (C) 22580349 and (C) 23570120; Environment Research and
   Technology Development Fund of the Ministry of Environment, Japan,
   Grant/Award Number: (D-1007)
CR [Anonymous], 1877, Radical Review
   Beenaerts N, 2010, MOL ECOL, V19, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04439.x
   Bergmann KGLC., 1847, Gttinger Studien, V3, P595
   Breuer T, 2007, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V134, P369, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.20678
   BROWN JH, 1969, EVOLUTION, V23, P329, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1969.tb03515.x
   Buck LT, 2018, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V192, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.05.032
   Clarke MR, 1999, AM J PRIMATOL, V47, P335, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1999)47:4<335::AID-AJP5>3.0.CO;2-Y
   Conly JM, 2008, CAN J INFECT DIS MED, V19, P12, DOI 10.1155/2008/970372
   Crusz H., 1986, Report of the Society for Researches on Native Livestock, P65
   Danner RM, 2015, J BIOGEOGR, V42, P114, DOI 10.1111/jbi.12389
   Fleagle JG, 2013, PRIMATE ADAPTATION AND EVOLUTION, 3RD EDITION, P1
   FOODEN J, 1990, J HUM EVOL, V19, P607, DOI 10.1016/0047-2484(90)90002-S
   Fooden J, 1997, PRIMATES, V38, P221, DOI 10.1007/BF02381611
   FOODEN J, 1982, Primates, V23, P574, DOI 10.1007/BF02373969
   FOODEN J, 1975, Fieldiana Zoology, V67, P1
   FOODEN J, 1985, AM J PRIMATOL, V8, P11, DOI 10.1002/ajp.1350080103
   FOODEN J, 1979, Primates, V20, P109, DOI 10.1007/BF02373832
   Fooden J, 1999, INT J PRIMATOL, V20, P431, DOI 10.1023/A:1020556922189
   FOODEN J, 1988, Fieldiana Zoology, P1
   Fooden J., 1995, Fieldiana Zoology, V81, P1, DOI DOI 10.5962/BHL.TITLE.3456
   Fooden Jack, 2006, Fieldiana Zoology, P1
   Gohli J, 2016, BMC EVOL BIOL, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12862-016-0778-x
   Gregory T, 2014, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V5, P443, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12177
   Groves Colin, 2003, P140
   Gutiérrez-Pinto N, 2014, BIOL J LINN SOC, V111, P850, DOI 10.1111/bij.12249
   Hamada Y., 1996, Variations in the Asian Macaques, P97
   Hamada Y, 2006, INT J PRIMATOL, V27, P497, DOI 10.1007/s10764-006-9033-4
   Huffman M. A., 2012, PRIMATE RES S, V28, P57, DOI [10.14907/primate.28.0_57, DOI 10.14907/PRIMATE.28.0_57]
   Jadejaroen J, 2015, PRIMATES, V56, P77, DOI 10.1007/s10329-014-0450-2
   Kawamoto Y, 2010, JAPANESE MACAQUES, P53, DOI 10.1007/978-4-431-53886-8_3
   Kurita H, 2012, PRIMATES, V53, P7, DOI 10.1007/s10329-011-0280-4
   Li C, 2015, AM J PRIMATOL, V77, P753, DOI 10.1002/ajp.22394
   Meiri S, 2007, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V16, P788, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00330.x
   Mittermeier R.A., 2013, Handbook of the mammals of the world, V3
   MORI A, 1979, Primates, V20, P371, DOI 10.1007/BF02373390
   National Research Council Committee on Occupational Health and Safety in the Care of Nonhuman Primates, 2003, OCC HLTH SAF CAR US, DOI [10.17226/10713, DOI 10.17226/10713]
   Oswald SA, 2012, INTEGR ZOOL, V7, P121, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2012.00287.x
   Paterson JD, 1996, INT J PRIMATOL, V17, P585, DOI 10.1007/BF02735193
   Pedersen AB, 2009, ECOHEALTH, V6, P496, DOI 10.1007/s10393-010-0284-3
   RICHARD AF, 1989, INT J PRIMATOL, V10, P569, DOI 10.1007/BF02739365
   Roos C., 2014, Asian Primates Journal, V4, P2
   Rothman JM, 2008, AM J PRIMATOL, V70, P1191, DOI 10.1002/ajp.20611
   Serrat MA, 2013, ANAT REC, V296, P1534, DOI 10.1002/ar.22763
   Serrat MA, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P19348, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0803319105
   SHOTAKE T, 1991, PRIMATES, V32, P283, DOI 10.1007/BF02382670
   Symonds MRE, 2010, AM NAT, V176, P188, DOI 10.1086/653666
   Tosi AJ, 2003, EVOLUTION, V57, P1419
   Vitanage P.W., 1970, P 2 SEM GEOL PROSP M, P391
   Wakamori H, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-37963-z
   WEAVER ME, 1969, ECOLOGY, V50, P710, DOI 10.2307/1936264
   Weinstein Karen J, 2011, Anat Res Int, V2011, P714624, DOI 10.1155/2011/714624
   Whitworth A, 2016, TROP CONSERV SCI, V9, P675, DOI 10.1177/194008291600900208
   Yom-Tov Y, 2006, OIKOS, V112, P91, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14183.x
   Yom-Tov Y, 2011, BIOL REV, V86, P531, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00168.x
   Zhang P, 2016, AM J PRIMATOL, V78, P679, DOI 10.1002/ajp.22534
NR 55
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 15
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0275-2565
EI 1098-2345
J9 AM J PRIMATOL
JI Am. J. Primatol.
PD MAR
PY 2020
VL 82
IS 3
AR e23113
DI 10.1002/ajp.23113
EA FEB 2020
PG 13
WC Zoology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Zoology
GA KS8YX
UT WOS:000515312800001
PM 32096278
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Ofoegbu, C
   New, MG
   Staline, K
AF Ofoegbu, Chidiebere
   New, Mark George
   Staline, Kibet
TI The Effect of Inter-Organisational Collaboration Networks on Climate
   Knowledge Flows and Communication to Pastoralists in Kenya
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; adaptation; livelihood; pastoralism
ID CATTLE FARMERS INTENTION; LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION; MANAGEMENT; ADAPTATION;
   GOVERNANCE; DROUGHT; CONSERVATION; STRATEGIES; DISTRICT; DISASTER
AB In Kenya, pastoralists have utilized natural grasslands using practices that often result in overgrazing, low productivity and low income. Such practices have caused environmental problems, which could be exacerbated by climate change. Although knowledge on practices that increase pastoralists' capacity to adapt to climate and environmental challenges is currently available, the adoption rate remains poor. Hence, there is growing interest in understanding how cross-scale inter-organizational collaboration process either facilitates or hinders climate knowledge communications to and uptake by pastoralists. This study used network analysis to identify how inter-organizational collaborations in knowledge production and dissemination shape knowledge flow and communication to pastoralists in Kenya. A knowledge mapping workshop, key informant interviews and questionnaire surveys were used to identify the key organizations involved in the generation, brokering, and dissemination of adaptation knowledge to pastoralists. Two networks of configurations were explored: (i) relations of collaboration in knowledge production and (ii) relations of collaboration in knowledge dissemination. Measure of clustering coefficient, density, core-periphery location, and degree centrality were used to analyze the network structure and cohesion, and its influence on knowledge flow and adoption. Findings revealed a strong integration across the network with research institutes, NGOs (Non-governmental organizations), and CBOs (Community based organizations) identified as among the central actors, based on their degree centrality. Further, we observed a higher density of ties among actors in the knowledge production network than the dissemination network. The lower density of the dissemination network indicates there are not that many activities by key organizations aimed at ensuring that knowledge reaches the users, compared to activities related to knowledge generation. This also results in poor feedback processes from local pastoralists to knowledge generators and brokers. Knowledge transfer and uptake could therefore be enhanced by improving dissemination activities and feedback mechanisms in the dissemination network as a means of capturing pastoralist perspectives on the relevance, reliability, and usability of knowledge for action. Reflection and revision can be used to improve knowledge so that it is more in sync with a pastoralist context.
C1 [Ofoegbu, Chidiebere; New, Mark George] Univ Cape Town, African Climate & Dev Initiat, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa.
   [New, Mark George] Univ East Anglia, Sch Int Dev, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England.
   [Staline, Kibet] Univ Nairobi Kenya, Dept Land Resource Management & Agr Technol, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.
C3 University of Cape Town; University of East Anglia; University of
   Nairobi
RP Ofoegbu, C (corresponding author), Univ Cape Town, African Climate & Dev Initiat, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa.
EM ofoegbu.c@gmail.com; mark.new@uct.ac.za; kibets3k@gmail.com
RI Kibet, Staline/AAA-9156-2019; Ofoegbu, Chidiebere/Q-8372-2019; New,
   Mark/A-7684-2008
OI New, Mark/0000-0001-6082-8879; Ofoegbu, Chidiebere/0000-0002-8920-9411
FU International Development Research Centre, Canada (IDRC); Dept. for
   International Development, United Kingdom (DFID) through the ASSAR
   project (Adaptation at Scale in the Semi-Arid Region) [ACDI-ASSAR-1034];
   ASSAR project
FX This research was funded by the International Development Research
   Centre, Canada (IDRC) and Dept. for International Development, United
   Kingdom (DFID) through the ASSAR project (Adaptation at Scale in the
   Semi-Arid Region), [ACDI-ASSAR-1034]. The APC was also funded through
   the ASSAR project.
CR Abrahamson E, 1997, ORGAN SCI, V8, P289, DOI 10.1287/orsc.8.3.289
   [Anonymous], 2011, COST AD CLIM CHANG A
   [Anonymous], 2002, Ucinet 6 for Windows
   [Anonymous], NAT CLIM CHANG RESP
   [Anonymous], INTRO SOCIAL NETWORK
   Asner GP, 2004, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V29, P261, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.29.062403.102142
   Behnke RH, 2011, ANIMAL MIGRATION: A SYNTHESIS, P144
   Bodin Ö, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002
   Borg R, 2015, FOREST POLICY ECON, V50, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.06.008
   Borges JAR, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V55, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.004
   Borges JAR, 2016, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V45, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.12.001
   Boy G., 2011, LAIKIPIA NATURAL HIS
   Bruno Soares M., 2014, USE SEASONAL DECADAL
   Buizer J, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P4597, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0900518107
   Bunning C., 2008, REV EVIDENCE DRYLAND
   Butt B, 2009, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V99, P309, DOI 10.1080/00045600802685895
   Campbell D.J., 1980, 30 U FIELD STAFF INT
   Campbell DJ, 2000, LAND USE POLICY, V17, P337, DOI 10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00038-7
   Catley A, 2013, PATHWAY SUSTAIN, P85
   Clewer A.G., 2001, Practical statistics and experimental design for plant and crop science, P1
   Conley T, 2001, AM J AGR ECON, V83, P668, DOI 10.1111/0002-9092.00188
   Coulibaly Y. J., 2015, 110 CCAFS CGIAR RES
   Carvalho PCD, 2009, LIVEST SCI, V120, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.04.012
   Dougill AJ, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V195, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.076
   Ernstson H, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
   FAO/LEAD, 2006, LIV LONG SHAD
   Cárcamo PF, 2014, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V91, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.01.007
   FRATKIN E, 1990, HUM ECOL, V18, P385, DOI 10.1007/BF00889464
   Fratkin E, 1997, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V26, P235, DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.235
   Gichuki F.N., 1998, RESOURCES ACTORS POL, V8
   Goldstein BE, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P238, DOI 10.1080/01944361003646463
   Government of Kenya (GOK), 2008, MAP KEN SHOW COUNT A
   Hulme M, 2001, CLIM RES, V17, P145, DOI 10.3354/cr017145
   Janssen MA, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Kabubo-Mariara J, 2008, NAT RESOUR FORUM, V32, P131, DOI 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2008.00178.x
   Kadushin Charles, 2012, Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts, and Findings
   Keller G., 2003, STAT MANAGEMENT EC, P350
   Kibet S, 2016, PASTORALISM, V6, DOI 10.1186/s13570-016-0063-z
   KRUGMAN P, 1991, J POLIT ECON, V99, P483, DOI 10.1086/261763
   Lebel L, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Little PD, 2001, DEV CHANGE, V32, P401, DOI 10.1111/1467-7660.00211
   Luseno WK, 2003, WORLD DEV, V31, P1477, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00113-X
   Muñoz-Erickson TA, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V18, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.08.013
   Nassef Magda., 2009, Pastoralism and Climate Change: Enabling Adaptive Capacity
   Ngugi R K., 2011, Int. J. Curr. Res, V3, P6
   Njiru B.N., 2012, HEXAGON SERIES HUMAN, V8
   Nori M., 2007, CHANGE WIND WIND CHA
   Ochieng R., 2017, Open Access Libr, V4, P1, DOI [10.4236/oalib.1103826, DOI 10.4236/OALIB.1103826]
   Ojwang G.O., 2010, Analysis of Climate Change and Variability Risks in the Smallholder Sector; Case studies of the Laikipia and Narok Districts Representing Major Agro-Ecological Zones in Kenya
   Osano PM, 2013, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V5, P198, DOI 10.1108/17568691311327596
   Pinkballoon, 2013, AFR MAP KEN MAP AFR
   Risbey J., 1999, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, V4, P137, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1009636607038
   Rombach MP, 2014, SIAM J APPL MATH, V74, P167, DOI 10.1137/120881683
   SCBD, 2009, CBD TECHNICAL SERIES, V41
   Silvestri S, 2012, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V12, P791, DOI 10.1007/s10113-012-0293-6
   Speranza CI, 2010, EUR J DEV RES, V22, P623, DOI 10.1057/ejdr.2010.39
   Stein C, 2011, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V36, P1085, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2011.07.083
   Tall A, 2013, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V1, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2013.07.007
   Tegegn M., 2003, REGIONAL SENSITIZATI
   Thornton PK, 2009, AGR SYST, V101, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2009.05.002
   Ziervogel G, 2004, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V65, P73, DOI 10.1023/B:CLIM.0000037492.18679.9e
   Ziervogel G, 2009, CLIM RES, V40, P133, DOI 10.3354/cr00804
NR 62
TC 6
Z9 7
U1 3
U2 18
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD NOV
PY 2018
VL 10
IS 11
AR 4180
DI 10.3390/su10114180
PG 23
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA HC1AQ
UT WOS:000451531700354
OA gold, Green Submitted, Green Accepted, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Kim, KI
   Gesch, RW
   Cermak, SC
   Phippen, WB
   Berti, MT
   Johnson, BL
   Marek, L
AF Kim, Ki-In
   Gesch, Russ W.
   Cermak, Steven C.
   Phippen, Winthrop B.
   Berti, Marisol T.
   Johnson, Burton L.
   Marek, Laura
TI Cuphea growth, yield, and oil characteristics as influenced by climate
   and soil environments across the upper Midwest USA
SO INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
LA English
DT Article
DE Cuphea; Seed oil; Fatty acids; Yield
ID FATTY-ACIDS; SEED YIELD; WATER-USE; TEMPERATURE; RAPE
AB Cuphea is a potential new oilseed crop rich in medium-chain fatty acids (C8:0 to C14:0) that may serve as a renewable, biodegradable source of oil for lubricants. motor oil, and aircraft fuel. Impacts of climate and soil environment on cuphea growth and development are not well understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of climate and soil on growth, seed yield, and seed oil characteristics of two semi-domesticated cuphea genotypes [PSR23 and HC-10 (Cuphea viscosissima Jacq. x C. lanceolata W.T. Aiton)] and three wild species [Cuphea wrightii, Cuphea lutea, and C. viscosissima (VS-6-CPR-1)] that show potential for domestication. The study was conducted in 2007 and 2008 at field sites in North Dakota (ND), Minnesota (MN). Iowa (IA), and Illinois (IL). Cuphea PSR23 and HC-10 were direct seeded in the field, while the three wild species were transplanted. The two plantings were treated as separate experiments. Plant growth, seed yield and oil content for the two direct-seeded lines tended to be distinctly greater in MN and ND than IL and IA, which was related more to growth temperature than soil environment. The three wild species generally performed similarly across the four different environments. C. wrightii had the greatest oil content, ranging from 320 to 360 g kg(-1), which was comprised of 59-64% lauric acid. For each genotype, the content of its most prominent saturated medium-chain fatty acid (e.g., C10:0 or C12:0) increased with decreasing latitude of field site. Seed yields for C. wrightii and C. lutea were as high as 1116 kg ha(-1). Combined with relatively high seed oil contents (280-350 g kg(-1)) these species may be good candidates for domestication. Results indicate that PSR23 and HC-10 are more regionally adapted than the wild species studied, which tended to exhibit a greater range of adaptability to climate and soil conditions. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V.
C1 [Gesch, Russ W.] USDA ARS, N Cent Soil Conservat Res Lab, Morris, MN 56267 USA.
   [Kim, Ki-In] Univ Minnesota, Dept Soil Water & Climate, St Paul, MN 55108 USA.
   [Cermak, Steven C.] USDA ARS, Natl Ctr Agr Utilizat Res Lab, Peoria, IL USA.
   [Phippen, Winthrop B.] Western Illinois Univ, Dept Agr, Macomb, IL 61455 USA.
   [Berti, Marisol T.; Johnson, Burton L.] N Dakota State Univ, Dept Plant Sci, Fargo, ND 58105 USA.
   [Marek, Laura] USDA ARS, N Cent Reg Plant Intro Stn, Ames, IA USA.
C3 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); University of Minnesota
   System; University of Minnesota Twin Cities; United States Department of
   Agriculture (USDA); Western Illinois University; North Dakota State
   University Fargo; United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
RP Gesch, RW (corresponding author), USDA ARS, N Cent Soil Conservat Res Lab, 803 Iowa Ave, Morris, MN 56267 USA.
EM russ.gesch@ars.usda.gov
OI Cermak, Steven/0000-0002-8032-6064
FU Energy & Environmental Research Center, University of North Dakota
   through Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
FX The authors thank Joe Boots, Fred Iutzi, and Irv Larsen for their expert
   field assistance and Amber L Durham for oil and fatty acid analysis. We
   also acknowledge funding by the Energy & Environmental Research Center,
   University of North Dakota for cuphea research, through a grant from the
   Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).
CR [Anonymous], 1972, PHYS EDAPHOLOGY PHYS
   ARKCOLL D, 1988, ECON BOT, V42, P195, DOI 10.1007/BF02858920
   Barnabas B, 2008, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V31, P11, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01727.x
   Berti MT, 2008, IND CROP PROD, V27, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.10.002
   Brown J.H., 2007, US Patent Application Publication, Patent No. [US 2007/0031354 A1, 20070031354]
   Cermak SC, 2004, J AM OIL CHEM SOC, V81, P297, DOI 10.1007/s11746-004-0899-2
   Crane J, 2003, PLANTA, V217, P699, DOI 10.1007/s00425-003-1036-1
   Forcella F, 2005, CROP SCI, V45, P2195, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2004.0593
   Geller DP, 1999, IND CROP PROD, V9, P85, DOI 10.1016/S0926-6690(98)00018-1
   Gesch RW, 2009, CROP SCI, V49, P1867, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2008.11.0664
   Gesch R, 2006, IND CROP PROD, V24, P300, DOI 10.1016/j.indcrop.2006.06.007
   Gesch RW, 2007, IND CROP PROD, V25, P305, DOI 10.1016/j.indcrop.2006.12.008
   Gesch RW, 2005, AGRON J, V97, P817, DOI 10.2134/agronj2004.0231
   Gesch RW, 2002, CROP SCI, V42, P1959, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2002.1959
   GRAHAM SA, 1989, CRIT REV FOOD SCI, V28, P139, DOI 10.1080/10408398909527495
   GRAHAM SA, 1981, AM J BOT, V68, P908, DOI 10.2307/2443221
   HIRSINGER F, 1985, J AM OIL CHEM SOC, V62, P76, DOI 10.1007/BF02541493
   HIRSINGER F, 1984, ECON BOT, V38, P439, DOI 10.1007/BF02859085
   Klute A., 1986, Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, P635
   Knapp SJ, 1997, CROP SCI, V37, P352, DOI 10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700020007x
   Knapp SJ, 2000, CROP SCI, V40, P299, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2000.0003rgp
   Kramer PJ, 1983, WATER RELATIONS PLAN, P235
   Morandin LA, 2006, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V116, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2006.02.012
   Moscheni E, 1994, IND CROP PROD, V3, P3, DOI 10.1016/0926-6690(94)90072-8
   Palmquist D.E., 1993, P KANS STAT U C APPL, P31
   Phippen WB, 2006, IND CROP PROD, V24, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.indcrop.2006.02.001
   Phippen WB, 2009, HANDB PLANT BREED, V4, P517, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-77594-4_19
   Sharratt BS, 2004, AGRON J, V96, P1475, DOI 10.2134/agronj2004.1475
   TAGLIANI LA, 1995, CROP SCI, V35, P1517, DOI 10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500050066x
   Tang JH, 2004, CROP SCI, V44, P732
   THOMPSON AE, 1984, HORTSCIENCE, V19, P352
   THOMPSON AE, 1990, J AM OIL CHEM SOC, V67, P611, DOI 10.1007/BF02540409
   TREMOLIERES A, 1982, PHYTOCHEMISTRY, V21, P41, DOI 10.1016/0031-9422(82)80011-3
NR 33
TC 8
Z9 9
U1 0
U2 10
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0926-6690
EI 1872-633X
J9 IND CROP PROD
JI Ind. Crop. Prod.
PD JAN
PY 2011
VL 33
IS 1
BP 99
EP 107
DI 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.09.003
PG 9
WC Agricultural Engineering; Agronomy
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA 703DY
UT WOS:000285955500015
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Elangbam, G
   Singh, AM
AF Elangbam, Goutam
   Singh, Abujam Manglem
TI How vulnerable are India's North-Eastern hills to climate change?
   Understanding environmental and socio-economic drivers of climate
   vulnerability in the state of Manipur
SO ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Climate vulnerability; Environmental vulnerability; Socio-economic
   vulnerability; Northeast India; Manipur
ID RESILIENT AGRICULTURE; FLOOD VULNERABILITY; INDICATORS; CLUSTER
AB Climate change threatens the environmental and socio-economic sustainability of people living in the ecologically fragile hills of Northeast India. To respond effectively to these challenges, there is a need for an integrated vulnerability assessment to guide the formulation of adaptation strategies. Climate vulnerability refers to an area's susceptibility or inability to cope with the adverse impacts of climate change, including variability and extremes, highlighting the need to assess both environmental and socioeconomic factors. This study conducted a district-level assessment of climate vulnerability in Manipur using a Composite Vulnerability Index (CVI) that combined environmental (8 indicators) and socioeconomic (6 indicators) factors with an unequal weighting scheme. GIS techniques were employed to map the CVI, Environmental Vulnerability Index (EVI), and Socioeconomic Vulnerability Index (SVI), revealing spatial variations in climate vulnerability and its driving factors. The results of the CVI indicated that Imphal West District(CVI = 0.234) was the least climate-vulnerable, due to its low social vulnerability (SVI = 0.196) and intermediate EVI score (0.323). On the other hand, Thoubal emerged as the most climate-vulnerable district in the state because of its high social vulnerability. Districts such as Churachandpur (EVI = 0.742) exhibited high environmental vulnerability, whereas the Senapati District (0.227) experienced minimum vulnerability according to the EVI. Grouping of districts into low, medium and high climate vulnerability categories was validated using hierarchical cluster analysis. This underscored the significance of targeted interventions for districts experiencing different levels of climate vulnerability. The findings of this study may be relevant for similar contexts within the Indian Himalayan states, especially in tropical and subtropical regions where urgent climate adaptation measures are essential. Moreover, the methods show significant flexibility, enabling comparisons of vulnerability across districts of the region and elsewhere. Importantly, it can adjust indicators to anticipate future changes in socioeconomic conditions.
C1 [Elangbam, Goutam; Singh, Abujam Manglem] Manipur Univ, Dept Geog, Imphal 795003, Manipur, India.
C3 Manipur University
RP Singh, AM (corresponding author), Manipur Univ, Dept Geog, Imphal 795003, Manipur, India.
EM amanglem@yahoo.com
OI abujam, Manglem/0000-0002-3546-3617
CR Abbass K, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P42539, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6
   Adger WN, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
   Ahmed I., 2024, Nat Hazards Res, DOI [10.1016/j.nhres.2023.12.018, DOI 10.1016/J.NHRES.2023.12.018]
   Akoijam S., 2016, SSRN J, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.2910285, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2910285]
   Alam MK, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V112, P1395, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05233-x
   [Anonymous], 2010, Climate change impact and vulnerability in the Eastern HimalayasSynthesis Report
   [Anonymous], Power Data Access viewer Available at
   [Anonymous], EC SURVEY MANIPUR 20
   Azhar G, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14040357
   Balaganesh G, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106197
   Barnett J, 2008, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V98, P102, DOI 10.1080/00045600701734315
   Barua A, 2019, Climate vulnerability assessment for the Indian Himalayan Region using a common framework
   Battiston S, 2021, J FINANC STABIL, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100867
   Bora SL, 2022, CURR SCI INDIA, V122, P801, DOI 10.18520/cs/v122/i7/801-811
   Brulle R., 2015, Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives, P1
   Census of India, 2011, Primary Census Abstract-2011
   Chauhan HK, 2023, ENVIRON DEV, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100814
   Chaurasia AR., 2023, Indian J Hum Dev, V17, P219, DOI [10.1177/09737030231178362, DOI 10.1177/09737030231178362]
   Chelariu OE., 2024, Romania Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk, V15, P2384607, DOI [10.1080/19475705.2024.2384607, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2024.2384607]
   Choudhury BA, 2019, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V124, P227, DOI 10.1029/2018JD029625
   Cutter SL, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P242, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
   Das S, 2020, PROG DISASTER SCI, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100110
   Dasgupta S., 2020, Climate vulnerability assessment for adaptation planning in india using a common framework
   Dash SK, 2012, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V98-99, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.07.006
   Dodson JC, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V748, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141346
   Donatti CI, 2024, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104488
   Economic Survey, Manipur, 2020-21
   El Garouani M, 2024, ENVIRON SUSTAIN IND, V22, DOI 10.1016/j.indic.2024.100383
   Estoque RC, 2023, AMBIO, V52, P376, DOI 10.1007/s13280-022-01806-z
   FAO, 2020, Manipur Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2014 (Act No. 10 of 2014)
   Feng YH, 2021, COMMUN EARTH ENVIRON, V2, DOI 10.1038/s43247-021-00163-1
   Fernandes F, 2023, SN APPL SCI, V5, DOI 10.1007/s42452-022-05214-6
   Fernandez P, 2016, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V94, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2016.04.003
   Feroze SM., 2014, Indian J Hill Farming, V27, P22
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Forest Survey of India, 2021, Indian State of Forest Report
   Gaur V.S., 2018, Report of Working Group II: Sustainable Tourism in the Indian Himalayan Region-Contributing to Sustainable Development
   Geological Survey of India, 2023, Landslide Inventory
   George A, 2024, ASIA-PAC J REG SCI, V8, P615, DOI 10.1007/s41685-024-00338-6
   George A, 2023, ASIA-PAC J REG SCI, V7, P1329, DOI 10.1007/s41685-023-00311-9
   Gogoi PP, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-45213-z
   Guo F, 2024, URBAN CLIM, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2024.102067
   Gupta AK, 2024, ENVIRON SUSTAIN IND, V22, DOI 10.1016/j.indic.2024.100377
   Hahn MB, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.11.002
   Hazarika A, 2024, ENVIRON SUSTAIN IND, V23, DOI 10.1016/j.indic.2024.100430
   IFP, 2021, Action plan, policies on climate change require review
   IMD Pune, 2013, Climate of North Eastern States
   Kantamaneni K, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12114771
   Kasthala S, 2024, SOC INDIC RES, V171, P605, DOI 10.1007/s11205-023-03271-x
   Kelly PM, 2000, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V47, P325, DOI 10.1023/A:1005627828199
   Khundrakpam Moirangleima Khundrakpam Moirangleima, 2009, Open Renewable Energy Journal, V2, P1
   Klionsky DJ, 2016, AUTOPHAGY, V12, P1, DOI 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356
   Kumar A, 2024, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V196, DOI 10.1007/s10661-024-12646-7
   Kumar A, 2024, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V155, P3449, DOI 10.1007/s00704-023-04814-5
   Kumar GD, 2024, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V196, DOI 10.1007/s10661-024-12952-0
   Mallapaty S, 2024, NATURE, V631, P718, DOI 10.1038/d41586-024-02321-9
   [Masson-Delmotte V. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change], 2021, 6 ASSESSMENT REPORT, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781009157896, 10.1017/9781009157896]
   McNamara KE, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P628, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0813-1
   Meru LB., 2024, Climate change ecological vulnerability and hotspot analysis of Himalayan forests in North-Eastern Region, DOI [10.1016/j.indic.2024.100472, DOI 10.1016/J.INDIC.2024.100472]
   Mohanty Abinash, 2021, Mapping India's Climate Vulnerability-A District Level Assessment
   MSDMA (Manipur State Disaster Management Authority), 2013, Manipur State Disaster Management Plan, V1
   Ngcamu BS, 2023, NAT HAZARDS, V118, P977, DOI 10.1007/s11069-023-06070-2
   Oppenheimer M, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1039
   Padhan N, 2023, NAT HAZARDS, V115, P2351, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05641-z
   Papathoma-Köhle M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101103
   Paul AR, 2023, SCI REP-UK, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-42360-2
   Poudel S, 2020, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V22, P8159, DOI 10.1007/s10668-019-00566-3
   Prasad BVS, 2016, Rural Pulse, P1
   Prtner H.O, 2022, Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, P3056, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844]
   Rai RK, 2018, ENVIRON DEV, V27, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2018.06.002
   Rao CAR, 2016, CURR SCI INDIA, V110, P1939, DOI 10.18520/cs/v110/i10/1939-1946
   Ravindranath NH, 2011, CURR SCI INDIA, V101, P384
   Ray P, 2021, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V32, P3870, DOI 10.1002/ldr.3986
   Roy SS, 2018, CURR SCI INDIA, V115, P1342, DOI 10.18520/cs/v115/i7/1342-1350
   Sachan D., 2021, Forest, V61, P54, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.2.28607.38561, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.28607.38561]
   Sanayanbi H., 2021, Pandey A
   SAPCC Manipur, 2013, Manipur
   Sarkodie SA, 2022, HUM SOC SCI COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1057/s41599-022-01130-7
   Sarun S, 2018, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V190, DOI 10.1007/s10661-018-7095-3
   Sekhri S, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106700
   Senapati AK., 2019, An indicator-based approach to assess farm households vulnerability to climate change: Evidence from Odisha, DOI [10.1007/s41324-019-00277-x, DOI 10.1007/S41324-019-00277-X]
   Senapati S., 2022, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., V82, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103368, DOI 10.1016/J.IJDRR.2022.103368]
   Sharma A, 2024, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104657
   Sheela A. M., 2012, Lakes & Reservoirs Research and Management, V17, P143, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1770.2012.00506.x
   Shukla R, 2016, APPL GEOGR, V74, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.07.013
   Singha S, 2018, EUR J SUSTAIN DEV, V7, P53, DOI 10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n3p53
   Smits J, 2024, SOC INDIC RES, V174, P721, DOI 10.1007/s11205-024-03399-4
   [Solomon S. IPCC. IPCC.], 2007, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, P996
   Sophia A., 2020, Holist Approach Environ, V10, P124, DOI [10.33765/thate.10.4.4, DOI 10.33765/THATE.10.4.4]
   Soraisam B, 2018, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V160, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.11.010
   Sphere India, 2015, Joint Needs Assessment Report: Manipur Floods
   Thangjam U, 2024, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104575
   Thangjam U, 2023, CLIM RISK MANAG, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2023.100519
   Turner BL, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P8074, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1231335100
   Wehbe C, 2024, SCI REP-UK, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41598-024-68060-z
   Yadava RN, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12031253
   Yusuf AriefAnshory., 2009, CLIMATE CHANGE VULNE
NR 97
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU SPRINGERNATURE
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON, N1 9XW, ENGLAND
SN 2509-7946
EI 2509-7954
J9 ASIA-PAC J REG SCI
JI Asia-Pac. J. Reg. Sci.
PD 2024 NOV 29
PY 2024
DI 10.1007/s41685-024-00363-5
EA NOV 2024
PG 31
WC Economics; Environmental Studies; Regional & Urban Planning
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public
   Administration
GA N8H1L
UT WOS:001366669700001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Walls, SC
   Barichivich, WJ
   Chandler, J
   Meade, AM
   Milinichik, M
   O'Donnell, KM
   Owens, ME
   Peacock, T
   Reinman, J
   Watling, RC
   Wetsch, OE
AF Walls, Susan C.
   Barichivich, William J.
   Chandler, Jonathan
   Meade, Ashley M.
   Milinichik, Marysa
   O'Donnell, Katherine M.
   Owens, Megan E.
   Peacock, Terry
   Reinman, Joseph
   Watling, Rebecca C.
   Wetsch, Olivia E.
TI Seeking shelter from the storm: Conservation and management of imperiled
   species in a changing climate
SO ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptation strategies; Ambystoma cingulatum; climate change; coastal
   wetlands; frosted flatwoods salamander; Hurricane Michael; imperiled
   species management; saltwater inundation; specific conductance; storm
   surge
ID COASTAL WETLANDS; GULF-COAST; RESPONSES; BIODIVERSITY; ADAPTATION;
   AMPHIBIANS; DECLINES; EXTREMES; IMPACT
AB Climate change is anticipated to exacerbate the extinction risk of species whose persistence is already compromised by habitat loss, invasive species, disease, or other stressors. In coastal areas of the southeastern United States (USA), many imperiled vertebrates are vulnerable to hurricanes, which climate models predict to become more severe in the 21st century. Despite this escalating threat, explicit adaptation strategies that address hurricane threats, in particular, and climate change more generally, are largely underrepresented in recovery planning and implementation. We provide a basis for stronger emphasis on strategic planning for imperiled species facing the increasing threat of catastrophic hurricanes. Our reasoning comes from observations of short-term environmental and biological impacts of Hurricane Michael, which impacted the Gulf Coast of the southeastern USA in October 2018. During this storm, St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge, located along the northern Gulf of Mexico's coast in the panhandle region of Florida, received storm surge that was 3.0-3.6 m (NAVD88) above sea level. Storm surge pushed sea water into some ephemeral freshwater ponds used for breeding by the federally threatened frosted flatwoods salamander (Ambystoma cingulatum). After the storm, specific conductance across all ponds measured varied from 80 to 23,100 mu S/cm, compared to 75 to 445 mu S/cm in spring 2018. For 17 overwashed wetlands that were measured in both spring and fall 2018, posthurricane conductance observations were, on average, more than 90 times higher than in the previous spring, setting the stage for varying population responses across this coastal landscape. Importantly, we found live individual flatwoods salamanders at both overwashed and non-overwashed sites, although we cannot yet assess the demographic consequences of this storm. We outline actions that could be incorporated into climate adaptation strategies and recovery planning for imperiled species, like A. cingulatum, that are associated with freshwater coastal wetlands in hurricane-prone regions.
C1 [Walls, Susan C.; Barichivich, William J.; O'Donnell, Katherine M.; Owens, Megan E.; Watling, Rebecca C.] US Geol Survey, Wetland & Aquat Res Ctr, Gainesville, FL 32653 USA.
   [Chandler, Jonathan; Meade, Ashley M.; Milinichik, Marysa; Peacock, Terry; Reinman, Joseph; Wetsch, Olivia E.] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, St Marks Natl Wildlife Refuge, St Marks, FL USA.
   [Owens, Megan E.; Watling, Rebecca C.] Conservat Legacy, Environm Stewards Program, Durango, CO USA.
C3 United States Department of the Interior; United States Geological
   Survey; United States Department of the Interior; US Fish & Wildlife
   Service
RP Walls, SC (corresponding author), US Geol Survey, Wetland & Aquat Res Ctr, Gainesville, FL 32653 USA.
EM swalls@usgs.gov
RI O'Donnell, Katherine/AAG-1106-2020
OI Meade Kusel, Ashley/0000-0001-6376-732X; O'Donnell,
   Katherine/0000-0001-9023-174X
FU U.S. Geological Survey Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative,
   Department of Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development
   Program (SERDP) [RC-2703]
FX U.S. Geological Survey Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative,
   Department of Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development
   Program (SERDP), Grant/Award Number: RC-2703
CR Adams MJ, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0064347
   Albecker MA, 2017, FRONT ZOOL, V14, DOI 10.1186/s12983-017-0222-0
   Anchukaitis KJ, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P5036, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0908572107
   [Anonymous], 2010, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
   [Anonymous], 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2
   [Anonymous], 1987, Viable Populations for Conservation
   Benscoter AM, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0070647
   Beven J.L., 2019, NATL HURRICANE CTR T
   Bhatia KT, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-08471-z
   Blaustein RJ, 2008, BIOSCIENCE, V58, P784, DOI 10.1641/B580904
   Chevin LM, 2017, PHILOS T R SOC B, V372, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2016.0138
   Chown SL, 2010, CLIM RES, V43, P3, DOI 10.3354/cr00879
   Dodd CK, 2007, AM MIDL NAT, V158, P29, DOI 10.1674/0003-0031(2007)158[29:CIANFG]2.0.CO;2
   Enwright NM, 2016, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V14, P307, DOI 10.1002/fee.1282
   Fisk G. W., 2017, CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPT
   Free CM, 2019, SCIENCE, V363, P979, DOI 10.1126/science.aau1758
   Gibbs JP, 1998, BIOSCIENCE, V48, P935, DOI 10.2307/1313297
   Grant EHC, 2017, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V15, P214, DOI 10.1002/fee.1481
   Griffis-Kyle KL, 2016, HERPETOL CONSERV BIO, V11, P563
   Guntenspergen G.R., 1995, IMPACTS HURRICANE AN, P324
   Gunzburger MS, 2010, WETL ECOL MANAG, V18, P651, DOI 10.1007/s11273-010-9185-z
   Hartmann D. L., 2013, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013
   Herrando-Pérez S, 2019, J ANIM ECOL, V88, P247, DOI 10.1111/1365-2656.12914
   Hoeppner JM, 2019, CONSERV BIOL, V33, P534, DOI 10.1111/cobi.13270
   Hopkins GR, 2016, PHYSIOL BIOCHEM ZOOL, V89, P322, DOI 10.1086/687292
   Hopkins GR, 2015, HERPETOL MONOGR, V29, P1
   Hossack BR, 2018, BIOL CONSERV, V228, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.10.007
   Howard JK, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0130710
   Knutson TR, 2013, J CLIMATE, V26, P6591, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00539.1
   Lawler JJ, 2009, ECOLOGY, V90, P588, DOI 10.1890/08-0823.1
   Leonard PB, 2017, ANIM CONSERV, V20, P80, DOI 10.1111/acv.12289
   Lin N, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V119, P8606, DOI 10.1002/2014JD021584
   Malcom JW, 2018, CONSERV LETT, V11, DOI 10.1111/conl.12601
   Maxwell SL, 2019, DIVERS DISTRIB, V25, P613, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12878
   Muths E, 2017, ORYX, V51, P210, DOI 10.1017/S0030605315001131
   Noble IR, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P833
   Noss RF, 2015, DIVERS DISTRIB, V21, P236, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12278
   Novarro AJ, 2018, J EXP BIOL, V221, DOI 10.1242/jeb.178236
   Osland MJ, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P1, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13084
   Pacifici M, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P205, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE3223
   Palis J.G., 2005, Amphibian Declines: The Conservation Status of United States Species, P608
   Povilitis A, 2010, CONSERV BIOL, V24, P372, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01447.x
   Purvis A, 2000, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V267, P1947, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2000.1234
   Riddell EA, 2018, SCI ADV, V4, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aar5471
   ROMAN CT, 1994, BIOSCIENCE, V44, P247, DOI 10.2307/1312229
   Schriever TA, 2009, WETLANDS, V29, P112, DOI 10.1672/07-82.1
   Selwood KE, 2015, BIOL REV, V90, P837, DOI 10.1111/brv.12136
   Semlitsch RD, 2017, J HERPETOL, V51, P12, DOI 10.1670/16-090
   Sergio F, 2018, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V161, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.10.009
   Shaffer Mark L., 2000, P301
   Shoo LP, 2011, J APPL ECOL, V48, P487, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01942.x
   Smith DR, 2018, J FISH WILDL MANAG, V9, P302, DOI 10.3996/052017-JFWM-041
   Stein BA, 2013, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V11, P502, DOI 10.1890/120277
   Tebaldi C, 2012, ENVIRON RES LETT, V7, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014032
   Urban MC, 2014, EVOL APPL, V7, P88, DOI 10.1111/eva.12114
   US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2019, DRAFT REC PLAN FROST
   US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2018, SERV MAK HEADW HURR
   US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 1999, S FLOR FIELD OFF MUL
   US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2009, REC PLAN NW ATL POP
   US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2017, REC PLANN IMPL
   US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2019, DRAFT SPEC STAT ASS
   US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2018, LIST CRIT HAB LIST W
   USFWS, 2016, USFWS SPEC STAT ASS
   *USGS, 1997, NAT FIELD MAN COLL W, pCHA1
   USGS, 2018, Flood Event Viewer.
   Wahl T, 2014, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V41, P491, DOI 10.1002/2013GL058777
   Walls Susan C., 2013, Biology - Basel, V2, P399, DOI 10.3390/biology2010399
   Woodruff JD, 2013, NATURE, V504, P44, DOI 10.1038/nature12855
NR 68
TC 11
Z9 15
U1 2
U2 28
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 2045-7758
J9 ECOL EVOL
JI Ecol. Evol.
PD JUN
PY 2019
VL 9
IS 12
BP 7122
EP 7133
DI 10.1002/ece3.5277
PG 12
WC Ecology; Evolutionary Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Evolutionary Biology
GA IN4MD
UT WOS:000478648300029
PM 31380037
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Portela, JA
   Sidoti, B
   Reybet, G
   Bellaccomo, C
   Astorquizaga, R
AF Portela, J. A.
   Sidoti, B.
   Reybet, G.
   Bellaccomo, C.
   Astorquizaga, R.
BE Wako, T
TI Yield Stability of Ten Garlic (<i>Allium sativum</i>) Clonal Cultivars
   in Northern Patagonia, Argentina
SO VI INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EDIBLE ALLIACEAE
SE Acta Horticulturae
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT 6th International Symposium on Edible Alliaceae
CY MAY 21-24, 2012
CL Fukuoka, JAPAN
SP Int Soc Hort Sci (ISHS)
DE bulb weight; ecophysiological groups; clone-environment interaction;
   AMMI model; SREG model; GGE biplot; mega-environment
AB Since 1989, the Garlic Project of INTA (The National Institute of Agricultural Technology, Argentina) has obtained an important number of clonal cultivars by means of clonal selection. Those high yielding and top quality cultivars allow extending the technological alternatives for the industry. However, all those clones have been obtained in a same location (La Consulta, Mendoza; 33.70 degrees S; 69.7 degrees W, 950 m a.s.l.) and little is known about their stability of response in environments outside the main producing region. The aim of this work was to study yield stability of clonal cultivars from different ecophysiological groups (EG), all selected at 33.70 degrees S, in promising locations for garlic production around northern Patagonia. Throughout 2005-2008 ten clones were proven in four sites. Each year the seed was provided from the site of origin of the clones (Experiment Station La Consulta). Cultivars studied were 'Morado INTA' (EG-II); 'Lican INTA', 'Norteno INTA', 'Nieve INTA', 'Perla INTA' and 'Union' (EG-III); 'Gostoso INTA', 'Fuego INTA' and 'Sureno INTA' (EG-IVa); 'Castano INTA' (EG-IVb). Sites for the survey were Cinco Saltos (Rio Negro; 38.82 degrees S; 68.7 degrees W, 290 m a.s.l.), Hilario Ascasubi (Buenos Aires; 39.38 degrees S 62.62 degrees W, 15 m a.s.l.), Viedma (Rio Negro; 40.78 degrees S; 63.5 degrees W, 9 m a.s.l.) and Trevelin (Chubut; 43.12 degrees S; 71.52 degrees W, 360 m a.s.l.). Bulb weight (g per plant) was analyzed by AMMI and SREG models through the software InfoGen. Although Morado INTA belongs to the EG-II (subtropical climate adaptation) it showed higher yields among clones proven in northern Patagonia (62.73 g on average), besides highly unstable. Clones of EG-III produced an intermediate and more stable response (bulb mean weight about 50 g). 'Gostoso INTA' gave the worst yield across all locations. The four sites in this study, although contrasting in latitudes and seasonal temperatures, would be considered belonging to a same mega-environment.
C1 [Portela, J. A.] INTA, Expt Stn La Consulta, CC 8, RA-5567 Mendoza, Argentina.
   [Sidoti, B.] Natl Inst Agr Technol, Expt Stn Valle Inferior Rio Negro, San Carlos De Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina.
   [Reybet, G.] Natl Univ Comahue, Fac Agron, Neuquen, Rio Negro, Argentina.
   [Bellaccomo, C.] Natl Inst Agr Technol, Expt Stn Hilario Ascasubi, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina.
   [Astorquizaga, R.] Natl Inst Agr Technol, Expt Stn Esquel, Chubut, Argentina.
C3 Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria (INTA); Instituto Nacional
   de Tecnologia Agropecuaria (INTA); Universidad Nacional del Comahue;
   Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria (INTA); Instituto Nacional
   de Tecnologia Agropecuaria (INTA)
RP Portela, JA (corresponding author), INTA, Expt Stn La Consulta, CC 8, RA-5567 Mendoza, Argentina.
EM jportela@laconsulta.inta.gov.ar
CR Balzarini M., 2004, INFOGEN SOFTWARE ANA
   Burba J.L., 1991, CURSO TALLER PRODUCC, V1, P76
   Burba J.L., 2008, HORTICULTURA ARGENTI, V27, P20
   Burba JL, 2005, ACTA HORTIC, P291, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.688.41
   Lopez Frasca A., 2006, HORTICULTURA ARGENTI, V25, P21
   MANN LOUIS K., 1958, HILGARDIA, V27, P385
   Portela JA, 2005, ACTA HORTIC, P239, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.688.32
   Portela JA., 2007, AJO ARGENTINO PAUTAS
   RACCA R, 1981, PHYTON-INT J EXP BOT, V41, P77
   Romagosa I., 1993, V1, P373
   Takagi H., 1990, ONIONS ALLIED CROPS, V3, P109
   Yan WK, 2000, CROP SCI, V40, P597, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x
NR 12
TC 2
Z9 3
U1 0
U2 0
PU INT SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
PI LEUVEN 1
PA PO BOX 500, 3001 LEUVEN 1, BELGIUM
SN 0567-7572
BN 978-90-66056-95-4
J9 ACTA HORTIC
PY 2012
VL 969
BP 107
EP 112
PG 6
WC Agronomy; Plant Sciences; Horticulture
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Agriculture; Plant Sciences
GA BGX84
UT WOS:000324531800012
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Scheller, RM
   Mladenoff, DJ
AF Scheller, Robert M.
   Mladenoff, David J.
TI Simulated effects of climate change, fragmentation, and inter-specific
   competition on tree species migration in northern Wisconsin, USA
SO CLIMATE RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; forest fragmentation; interspecific competition; carbon
   storage; LANDIS-II; tree species range expansion; tree species migration
ID EASTERN UNITED-STATES; GREAT-LAKES REGION; PLANT MIGRATION; ECOSYSTEM
   RESPONSE; FOREST COMPOSITION; RANGE LIMITS; LANDSCAPE; MODEL; RATES;
   DISPERSAL
AB The reproductive success, growth, and mortality rates of tree species in the northern United States will be differentially affected by projected climate change over the next century. As a consequence, the spatial distributions of tree species will expand or contract at differential rates. In addition, human fragmentation of the landscape may limit effective seed dispersal, and inter-specific competition may limit the migration of climate-adapted species, restraining the rate of tree species migration. If the northward migration of tree species adapted to a warmer climate lags behind the rate of climatic change, overall growth rates and aboveground biomass of northern forests may be significantly reduced relative to their potential. We used a spatially interactive forest landscape model, LANDIS-II, that simulates tree species establishment, growth, mortality, succession, and disturbance. We simulated multiple scenarios of disturbance and climatic change across a similar to 15 000 km(2) forested landscape in northwestern Wisconsin, USA. These simulations were used to estimate changes in aboveground live biomass and the spatial distribution of 22 tree species. We observed a reduction in aboveground live biomass relative to the potential biomass for the combined soils and changing climate. We regressed the reduction of potential aboveground biomass against a measure of fragmentation, the initial biomass for 22 tree species, and soil water holding capacity calculated at 3 spatial resolutions. We also regressed the range expansion of 3 individual tree species that are expected to expand their distributions against the same variables. Species migration and range expansion were negatively correlated with fragmentation both in total and for 2 of the 3 species examined in detail. The initial abundances of some tree species were also significant predictors of species migration and range expansion and indicate significant competition between existing species assemblages and more southerly species that are expected to migrate north. In conclusion, the aboveground biomass of northern forests may be limited by interactions among climate change, interspecific competition, and fragmentation.
C1 [Scheller, Robert M.; Mladenoff, David J.] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Forestry & Wildlife Ecol, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
C3 University of Wisconsin System; University of Wisconsin Madison
RP Scheller, RM (corresponding author), Conservat Biol Inst, 136 SW Washington,Suite 202, Corvallis, OR 97333 USA.
EM rmscheller@consbio.org
RI Scheller, Robert/B-3135-2009
OI Scheller, Robert/0000-0002-7507-4499
CR ABER JD, 1992, OECOLOGIA, V92, P463, DOI 10.1007/BF00317837
   [Anonymous], SAS ONL DOC VERS 8
   [Anonymous], 2007, Climate Change 2007: The Scientific Basis
   BOTKIN DB, 1972, J ECOL, V60, P849, DOI 10.2307/2258570
   Clark JS, 1998, BIOSCIENCE, V48, P13, DOI 10.2307/1313224
   Clark JS, 1998, AM NAT, V152, P204, DOI 10.1086/286162
   Collingham YC, 2000, ECOL APPL, V10, P131, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0131:IOHFAP]2.0.CO;2
   CROW TR, 1978, ECOLOGY, V59, P265, DOI 10.2307/1936372
   Currie DJ, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P216, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0005-4
   Curtis J. T., 1959, The Vegetation of Wisconsin: An Ordination of Plant Communities
   Dale VH, 2001, BIOSCIENCE, V51, P723, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0723:CCAFD]2.0.CO;2
   DAVIDSON EA, 1993, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V22, P107, DOI 10.1007/BF00002707
   DAVIS MB, 1989, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V15, P75, DOI 10.1007/BF00138846
   DEZONIA B, 2005, IAN 1 0 7
   Farmer R.E. J., 1997, SEED ECOPHYSIOLOGY T
   Gustafson EJ, 1998, ECOSYSTEMS, V1, P143, DOI 10.1007/s100219900011
   Gustafson EJ, 2000, CAN J FOREST RES, V30, P32, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-30-1-32
   He HS, 1998, ECOL APPL, V8, P1072, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[1072:IOGDAC]2.0.CO;2
   Hewitt N, 2002, J BIOGEOGR, V29, P351, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00679.x
   Higgins SI, 2003, J ECOL, V91, P341, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00781.x
   Higgins SI, 2003, OIKOS, V101, P354, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12141.x
   Host GE, 1996, ECOL APPL, V6, P608, DOI 10.2307/2269395
   Iverson LR, 1999, ECOL MODEL, V115, P77, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(98)00200-2
   Iverson LR, 2004, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V19, P787, DOI 10.1007/s10980-005-3990-5
   Iverson LR, 2004, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V13, P209, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2004.00093.x
   Iverson LR, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P186, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0003-6
   Loehle C, 2000, CAN J FOREST RES, V30, P1632, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-30-10-1632
   Loehle C, 1998, J BIOGEOGR, V25, P735, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.2540735.x
   Loehle C, 2000, AM NAT, V156, P14, DOI 10.1086/303369
   Loehle C, 1996, ECOL MODEL, V90, P1, DOI 10.1016/0304-3800(96)83709-4
   Malanson GP, 1997, PLANT ECOL, V131, P67, DOI 10.1023/A:1009770924942
   Malcolm JR, 2002, J BIOGEOGR, V29, P835, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00702.x
   McLachlan JS, 2005, ECOLOGY, V86, P2088, DOI 10.1890/04-1036
   MELILLO JM, 1995, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V9, P407
   MLADENOFF DJ, 1993, CONSERV BIOL, V7, P889, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.740889.x
   Mladenoff DJ, 2004, ECOL MODEL, V180, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.03.016
   Nitschke CR, 2008, ECOL MODEL, V210, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.07.026
   PASTOR J, 1986, DEV LINKED FOREST PR, V86
   Rastetter EB, 1996, BIOSCIENCE, V46, P190, DOI 10.2307/1312740
   Scheller RM, 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V11, P307, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00906.x
   Scheller RM, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P396, DOI 10.1007/s10021-003-0087-2
   Scheller RM, 2004, ECOL MODEL, V180, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.01.022
   Scheller RM, 2007, ECOL MODEL, V201, P409, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.10.009
   Schulte LA, 2002, CAN J FOREST RES, V32, P1616, DOI 10.1139/X02-082
   *STATSGO, 1994, STAT SOIL GEOGR DAT, V94
   Sykes MT, 1996, J BIOGEOGR, V23, P203
   Walker KV, 2002, J GREAT LAKES RES, V28, P555, DOI 10.1016/S0380-1330(02)70605-9
   Ward BC, 2005, FOREST SCI, V51, P616
   Xu CG, 2007, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V13, P1469, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01387.x
   ZED X, 1995, HIREZ DATA CLIMATOLO
NR 50
TC 68
Z9 85
U1 3
U2 66
PU INTER-RESEARCH
PI OLDENDORF LUHE
PA NORDBUNTE 23, D-21385 OLDENDORF LUHE, GERMANY
SN 0936-577X
J9 CLIM RES
JI Clim. Res.
PD JUN 24
PY 2008
VL 36
IS 3
BP 191
EP 202
DI 10.3354/cr00745
PG 12
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA 329BV
UT WOS:000257842800002
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Roudeillac, P
AF Roudeillac, Philippe
TI From a luxury good for capitalists to profitable export China becomes
   the world's third largest strawberry producer with its own breeding and
   world-wide marketing
SO ERWERBS-OBSTBAU
LA English
DT Article
DE strawberry; strawberry; cultivars export; climate; climate change;
   climate adaption; individually quick frozen fruit; juice plant breeders
   rights; marketing; breeding
AB The 23% consolidation of China's strawberry industry from 70,000ha in 2005 to 53,000ha in 2006 due to extreme climate conditions reduced production from 840,000 t to 650,000 t. This tonnage includes a 40% market share for processing for the home market (150,000-190,000t) and frozen fruit for both the home market and export (70,000-90,000 t) and makes China the world's third largest strawberry producer after the US and Europe.
   Strawberry cultivation in China is characterised by family smallholders with an averaged acreage of ca. 2,000 m(2) and salaries of 2 euros/person/day for hired labour resulting in ca. 500 euros/1,000 m(2) gross return. The major growing regions are the provinces Hebei (near Baoding), Shandong, Liaoning with an acreage of ca. 10,000 ha each. Strawberry plants and varieties are imported, but new Chinese varieties such as 'Chun Xing', 'Xing Du 1 and 2', 'Xuemi' and 'Chun Xu' are increasingly grown. The Chinese varieties are characterised by their sweet flavour with low acidity, a pre-requisite for the Asian market, and good taste and are adapted to the respective growing climate. A portion of the strawberry harvest is used for processing due to insufficient external fruit quality such as size, shape and colour by European standard. Strawberry research in China is spread between 9 institutions and universities throughout the country.
   Strawberries were regarded as exclusive desert and luxury for the upper class during the ten years of the cultural revolution between 1966-1976 under Mao Zedong. Today, fresh strawberries are sold in street markets or supermarkets. Import of strawberry fruit is prohibited, except for Hongkong, which imports 2,200 t from China and the US. China's export of 76,000 t in 2005, equivalent to a 9-10% export rate, was shipped to Japan (11,000 t) and Germany (8,700 t) with dumping prices below 50 cent/kg.
C1 Int Obstbauberater, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
RP Roudeillac, P (corresponding author), Int Obstbauberater, 22 Rue Rolland, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
EM philippe.roudeillac@numericable.fr
CR *BIBL I, 2007, BROCKH MULT
   Blanke M., 2003, Erwerbsobstbau, V45, P97
NR 2
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 16
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA 233 SPRING STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA
SN 0014-0309
J9 ERWERBS-OBSTBAU
JI Erwerbs-Obstbau
PD JUN
PY 2007
VL 49
IS 2
BP 57
EP 63
DI 10.1007/s10341-007-0034-z
PG 7
WC Horticulture
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA 280ZS
UT WOS:000254466300004
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Bentz, BJ
   Logan, JA
   Vandygriff, JC
AF Bentz, BJ
   Logan, JA
   Vandygriff, JC
TI Latitudinal variation in <i>Dendroctonus ponderosae</i> (Coleoptera:
   Scolytidae) development time and adult size
SO CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST
LA English
DT Article
ID MOUNTAIN PINE-BEETLE; LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS; HOPKINS COLEOPTERA; CLIMATIC
   ADAPTATION; GEOGRAPHIC-VARIATION; POPULATIONS; TEMPERATURE;
   DIFFERENTIATION; CRICKET
AB Dendroctonus ponderosae (Hopkins) is widely distributed across western North America, feeding in at least 12 native species of Pinus L. (Pinaceae). We investigated the existence of heritable differences in two life-history parameters (adult size and development time) of D. ponderosae from a northern population (central Idaho, Pinus contorta Douglas ex Loudon) and a southern population (southern Utah, Pinus ponder osa Douglas ex P. and C. Lawson). We attempted to separate heritable from environmental effects by rearing individuals from both populations through two generations (F-1 and F-2) in a common standardized laboratory environment with a constant temperature. Two treatment effects were tested for in the F-2 generation: (I) geographic location (source host) for F-0 D. porderosae; and (2) the F-2 brood host. We hypothesized that, if differences were observed and the F-0 source host and region had a greater effect on F-2 brood development time and adult size than did the host in which F-2 brood were reared, a heritable factor related to the F-0 parents was responsible. Time to emergence was significantly shorter for second-generation offspring of the northern population than for second-generation offspring of the southern population, regardless of the F-2 brood host. Although both the F-2 brood host and F-0 source parents were significant in explaining differences observed in the developmental-time distribution of F-2 brood, the F-0 source effect was round to be much greater. Also, F-2 males and females from southern source parents were sig nificantly larger than F-2 brood from northern source parents when reared in both F-2 brood hosts. Geographic region and original host of F-0 source parents had a significant effect on F-2 offspring size, whereas the immediate food for F-2 brood was not significant in explaining differences. These results suggest genetically based regional differences in D. ponderosae populations.
C1 USDA Forest Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, Logan, UT 84321 USA.
C3 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); United States Forest
   Service
RP USDA Forest Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, 860 N 1200 E, Logan, UT 84321 USA.
EM bbentz@fs.fed.us
CR AMMAN G D, 1972, Environmental Entomology, V1, P691, DOI 10.1093/ee/1.6.691
   Amman G. D., 1983, INT145 USDA FOR SERV
   AMMAN GD, 1982, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V11, P590, DOI 10.1093/ee/11.3.590
   ATKINSON D, 1994, ADV ECOL RES, V25, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60212-3
   AYRES MP, 1994, ECOL MONOGR, V64, P465, DOI 10.2307/2937146
   BALDWIN JD, 1986, OECOLOGIA, V69, P64, DOI 10.1007/BF00399039
   Bentz BJ, 1999, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V28, P577, DOI 10.1093/ee/28.4.577
   Blanckenhorn WU, 1997, OECOLOGIA, V109, P342, DOI 10.1007/s004420050092
   Cerezke HF, 1995, CAN ENTOMOL, V127, P955, DOI 10.4039/Ent127955-6
   Gomi T, 1996, FUNCT ECOL, V10, P384, DOI 10.2307/2390287
   HAY C. JOHN, 1956, ANN ENT SOC AMER, V49, P567
   HILBERT DW, 1995, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V24, P771, DOI 10.1093/ee/24.4.771
   Langermann Tzvi., 1991, MAIMONIDES STUDIES, V2, P123
   LANGOR DW, 1990, EVOLUTION, V44, P609, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05941.x
   LANGOR DW, 1989, CAN ENTOMOL, V121, P149, DOI 10.4039/Ent121149-2
   Logan JA, 1999, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V28, P924, DOI 10.1093/ee/28.6.924
   Logan JA, 1998, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V27, P555, DOI 10.1093/ee/27.3.555
   MASAKI S, 1978, OECOLOGIA, V35, P343, DOI 10.1007/BF00345141
   MASAKI S, 1972, EVOLUTION, V26, P587, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1972.tb01966.x
   MASAKI S, 1967, EVOLUTION, V21, P725, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1967.tb03430.x
   MOUSSEAU TA, 1991, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V36, P511, DOI 10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.002455
   Nelson W., 1982, Applied Life Data Analysis
   Nylin S, 1998, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V43, P63, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.63
   REID R. W., 1962, CA NADIAN ENTOMOL, V94, P605
   ROFF D, 1980, OECOLOGIA, V45, P202, DOI 10.1007/BF00346461
   *S PLUS, 1997, S PLUS 4 GUID STAT
   Safranyik L., 1970, Bi-m. Res. Notes, V26
   SAFRANYIK L, 1970, BIMONTHLY RES NOTES, V26, P19
   *SPSS, 1997, SPSS BAS 8 US GUID
   STOCK MW, 1980, ANN ENTOMOL SOC AM, V73, P472, DOI 10.1093/aesa/73.4.472
   STOCK MW, 1984, ANN ENTOMOL SOC AM, V77, P760, DOI 10.1093/aesa/77.6.760
   STURGEON KB, 1986, EVOLUTION, V40, P290, DOI 10.2307/2408809
   TAUBER CA, 1988, ANN ENTOMOL SOC AM, V81, P755, DOI 10.1093/aesa/81.5.755
   Wood S. L., 1982, The bark and ambrosia beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera : Scolytidae), a taxonomic monograph.
NR 34
TC 81
Z9 104
U1 1
U2 24
PU CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
PI NEW YORK
PA 32 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, NEW YORK, NY 10013-2473 USA
SN 0008-347X
EI 1918-3240
J9 CAN ENTOMOL
JI Can. Entomol.
PD MAY-JUN
PY 2001
VL 133
IS 3
BP 375
EP 387
DI 10.4039/Ent133375-3
PG 13
WC Entomology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Entomology
GA 440ZA
UT WOS:000169205500010
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Bhartiya, A
   Rajesh, V
   Aditya, JP
   Jeevan, B
   Gupta, S
   Kant, L
   Joshi, H
   Mehtre, SP
   Devi, HN
   Jaybhay, S
   Karnwal, MK
   Nataraj, V
   Khandekar, N
AF Bhartiya, Anuradha
   Rajesh, Vangala
   Aditya, J. P.
   Jeevan, B.
   Gupta, Sanjay
   Kant, Lakshmi
   Joshi, Hemlata
   Mehtre, S. P.
   Devi, H. N.
   Jaybhay, S.
   Karnwal, M. K.
   Nataraj, Vennampally
   Khandekar, Nita
TI Evaluation of indigenous and exotic soybean accessions for yield,
   resistance to frog-eye leaf spot and yellow mosaic virus diseases
SO PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES-CHARACTERIZATION AND UTILIZATION
LA English
DT Article
DE diversity; frog-eye leaf spot (FLS) and yellow mosaic virus (YMV);
   multilocation; multivariate analysis; soybean
ID RAIN-FED CONDITION; L. MERRILL GENOTYPES; GENETIC DIVERSITY;
   IMPROVEMENT; STABILITY; BIPLOT; TRIAL; INDIA
AB Soybean is a major source of vegetable oil and protein worldwide. Globally, India is among the top five producers where soybean is a major oilseed grown under diverse agro-climatic conditions by small and marginal farmers. The present study aims to identify soybean varieties with higher yield levels, resistance to pestdiseases and adaptability to climatic fluctuations. One hundred and twenty-five (125) indigenous and exotic soybean germplasm accessions and five checks were evaluated and characterized for eight agro-morphological traits at five testing locations and also screened for frog-eye leaf spot (FLS) and yellow mosaic virus (YMV) diseases under hot-spot locations during the rainy season. A wide range of variability was observed among accessions for days to 50% flowering (39-59), plant height (41-111 cm), number of nodes/plant (10-30), pod clusters/plant (14-39), number of pods/plant (40-102), days to maturity (96-115), grain yield/plant (4.89-16.54 g) and 100-seed weight (6.02-13.72 g). Among various traits, 100-seed weight (0.45), number of pods/plant (0.60) and number of pod clusters/plant (0.38) were found to be major yield-contributing traits as they exhibited highly significant correlation with grain yield/plant. Principal components PCI and PCII with eigen value >1 accounted for 42.66 and 27.08% of the total variation, respectively. Accessions G24 (EC 393222) from Taiwan and G40 (IMP-1) from the USA belonging to cluster IV were found promising for multiple yield traits and JS 20-38 from cluster III for earliness as per cluster analysis. GGE biplot average environment coordination (AEC) view revealed that the accessions viz., G11 (EC 333872), G2 (EC 251506) and G47 (TNAU-S-55) were the best performing stable genotypes in terms of grain yield/plant across locations. Twelve accessions had a high level of resistance against both FLS and YMV diseases under natural hot-spot conditions which can be utilized as promising donors in the soybean breeding programme.
C1 [Bhartiya, Anuradha; Aditya, J. P.; Jeevan, B.; Kant, Lakshmi; Joshi, Hemlata] ICAR Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sanst, Almora, Uttarakhand, India.
   [Rajesh, Vangala; Gupta, Sanjay; Nataraj, Vennampally; Khandekar, Nita] ICAR Indian Inst Soybean Res, Indore, MP, India.
   [Mehtre, S. P.] Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agr Univ VNMKV, Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.
   [Devi, H. N.] Cent Agr Univ CAU, Imphal, Manipur, India.
   [Jaybhay, S.] Agharkar Res Inst ARI, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
   [Karnwal, M. K.] GB Pant Univ Agr & Technol GBPUA&T, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India.
C3 Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR); ICAR - Indian Institute
   of Soybean Research; Department of Science & Technology (India);
   Agharkar Research Institute (ARI); Govind Ballabh Pant University of
   Agriculture Technology
RP Bhartiya, A (corresponding author), ICAR Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sanst, Almora, Uttarakhand, India.
EM anuradha.bhartiya@icar.gov.in
RI Khandekar, Nita/ABA-1527-2020; Nataraj, Vennampally/ABA-2149-2020
CR Agarwal DK, 2013, AGR RES, V2, P293, DOI 10.1007/s40003-013-0088-0
   Bhartiya A, 2017, J ANIM PLANT SCI-PAK, V27, P227
   Bhartiya A, 2018, INDIAN J GENET PL BR, V78, P342, DOI 10.31742/IJGPB.78.3.6
   Bhartiya A, 2016, LEGUME RES, V39, P31
   Chander S, 2021, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/agronomy11030604
   DES, 2020, DIRECTORATE EC STAT
   FAOSTAT, 2020, FAO-News Article: Alarm over Desert Locusts Increases as New Generation of the Destructive Pests Starts Breeding in Horn of Africa
   Fu Y, 2015, THEOR APPL GENET, V128, P1029, DOI 10.1007/s00122-015-2487-z
   Ghimire KH, 2018, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V65, P1147, DOI 10.1007/s10722-017-0602-5
   Gireesh C, 2017, PLANT GENET RESOUR-C, V15, P230, DOI 10.1017/S1479262115000556
   Hou ZH, 2022, ADV BOT RES, V102, P43, DOI 10.1016/bs.abr.2022.02.007
   IBPGR, 1984, INT BOARD PLANT GENE
   Islam MR, 2019, PLANT PROD SCI, V22, P220, DOI 10.1080/1343943X.2018.1561197
   Joshi D., 2018, INT J CHEM STUD, V6, P2731
   Kofsky J, 2018, FRONT PLANT SCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00949
   Kumawat G, 2015, PHYSIOL MOL BIOL PLA, V21, P101, DOI 10.1007/s12298-014-0266-y
   Kuswantoro H., 2017, Biodiversitas: Journal of Biological Diversity, V18, P378, DOI 10.13057/biodiv/d180149
   Lal SK., 2005, SOYBEAN GENETICS NEW, V32, P8083
   Liu LP, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0235397
   McDonald SC, 2022, PLANT METHODS, V18, DOI 10.1186/s13007-022-00934-7
   Mishra K. K., 2021, Indian Phytopathology, V74, P1117, DOI 10.1007/s42360-021-00399-z
   Nataraj V, 2021, AGRON J, V113, DOI 10.1002/agj2.20750
   Naveesh YB., 2020, INT J CURRENT MICROB, V9, P2070
   Oliveira MF, 2010, FIELD CROP RES, V119, P277, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.07.021
   Pandey S, 2018, Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, V7, P279
   SHANNON CE, 1948, BELL SYST TECH J, V27, P623, DOI 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x
   Sharma P, 2016, LEGUME RES, V39, P935, DOI 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.11190
   Singh RJ, 1999, GENOME, V42, P605, DOI 10.1139/gen-42-4-605
   Sohidul Islam M, 2022, Soybean-Recent Advances in Research and Applications, DOI [10.5772/intechopen.104129, DOI 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.104129]
   Terzic D., 2018, 22 ECO C EC MOV NOV
   Yan WK, 2002, AGRON J, V94, P990, DOI 10.2134/agronj2002.0990
   Yang W, 2001, CROP SCI, V41, P549, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2001.412549x
NR 32
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 2
PU CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
PI CAMBRIDGE
PA EDINBURGH BLDG, SHAFTESBURY RD, CB2 8RU CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND
SN 1479-2621
EI 1479-263X
J9 PLANT GENET RESOUR-C
JI Plant Genet. Resour.-Charact. Util.
PD DEC
PY 2023
VL 21
IS 6
BP 513
EP 519
DI 10.1017/S1479262123000941
EA DEC 2023
PG 7
WC Plant Sciences; Genetics & Heredity
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences; Genetics & Heredity
GA IA4B8
UT WOS:001126547800001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Srirattana, K
   McCosker, K
   Schatz, T
   St John, JC
AF Srirattana, Kanokwan
   McCosker, Kieren
   Schatz, Tim
   St John, Justin C.
TI Cattle phenotypes can disguise their maternal ancestry
SO BMC GENETICS
LA English
DT Article
DE Mitochondrial DNA; Phylogenetics; Cattle; Embryo development; Animal
   breeding
ID MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA CONTENT; EMBRYONIC STEM-CELLS; TICK
   BOOPHILUS-MICROPLUS; D-LOOP REGION; COPY NUMBER; PATERNAL INHERITANCE;
   FIELD INFESTATIONS; GENETIC-VARIATION; NUCLEAR TRANSFER; BOVINE EMBRYOS
AB Background: Cattle are bred for, amongst other factors, specific traits, including parasite resistance and adaptation to climate. However, the influence and inheritance of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) are not usually considered in breeding programmes. In this study, we analysed the mtDNA profiles of cattle from Victoria (VIC), southern Australia, which is a temperate climate, and the Northern Territory (NT), the northern part of Australia, which has a tropical climate, to determine if the mtDNA profiles of these cattle are indicative of breed and phenotype, and whether these profiles are appropriate for their environments.
   Results: A phylogenetic tree of the full mtDNA sequences of different breeds of cattle, which were obtained from the NCBI database, showed that the mtDNA profiles of cattle do not always reflect their phenotype as some cattle with Bos taurus phenotypes had Bos indicus mtDNA, whilst some cattle with Bos indicus phenotypes had Bos taurus mtDNA. Using D-loop sequencing, we were able to contrast the phenotypes and mtDNA profiles from different species of cattle from the 2 distinct cattle breeding regions of Australia. We found that 67 of the 121 cattle with Bos indicus phenotypes from NT (55.4%) had Bos taurus mtDNA. In VIC, 92 of the 225 cattle with Bos taurus phenotypes (40.9%) possessed Bos indicus mtDNA. When focusing on oocytes from cattle with the Bos taurus phenotype in VIC, their respective oocytes with Bos indicus mtDNA had significantly lower levels of mtDNA copy number compared with oocytes possessing Bos taurus mtDNA (P < 0.01). However, embryos derived from oocytes with Bos indicus mtDNA had the same ability to develop to the blastocyst stage and the levels of mtDNA copy number in their blastocysts were similar to blastocysts derived from oocytes harbouring Bos taurus mtDNA. Nevertheless, oocytes originating from the Bos indicus phenotype exhibited lower developmental potential due to low mtDNA copy number when compared with oocytes from cattle with a Bos taurus phenotype.
   Conclusions: The phenotype of cattle is not always related to their mtDNA profiles. MtDNA profiles should be considered for breeding programmes as they also influence phenotypic traits and reproductive capacity in terms of oocyte quality.
C1 [Srirattana, Kanokwan; St John, Justin C.] Hudson Inst Med Res, Ctr Genet Dis, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia.
   [Srirattana, Kanokwan; St John, Justin C.] Monash Univ, Dept Mol & Translat Sci, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia.
   [McCosker, Kieren; Schatz, Tim] Dept Primary Ind & Resources, Darwin, NT 0800, Australia.
C3 Hudson Institute of Medical Research; Monash University; NT Department
   of Primary Industry & Resources
RP St John, JC (corresponding author), Hudson Inst Med Res, Ctr Genet Dis, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia.; St John, JC (corresponding author), Monash Univ, Dept Mol & Translat Sci, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia.
EM justin.stjohn@hudson.org.au
RI McCosker, Kieren/AAC-1397-2022; St. John, Justin/A-2942-2010
OI St. John, Jus/0000-0002-3993-1449; McCosker, Kieren/0000-0001-9442-0222
FU Hudson Institute of Medical Research Discretionary Funds; Victorian
   Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program; Monash Graduate
   Scholarship; Monash International Postgraduate Research Scholarship
FX This work was supported by Hudson Institute of Medical Research
   Discretionary Funds and the Victorian Government's Operational
   Infrastructure Support Program. KS was supported by a Monash Graduate
   Scholarship and a Monash International Postgraduate Research
   Scholarship.
CR Allais S, 2010, J ANIM SCI, V88, P446, DOI 10.2527/jas.2009-2385
   ANDERSON S, 1981, NATURE, V290, P457, DOI 10.1038/290457a0
   ANDERSON S, 1982, J MOL BIOL, V156, P683, DOI 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90137-1
   Basiricò L, 2011, CELL STRESS CHAPERON, V16, P441, DOI 10.1007/s12192-011-0257-7
   Bellizzi D, 2009, CELL STRESS CHAPERON, V14, P265, DOI 10.1007/s12192-008-0081-x
   Biase FH, 2007, GENET MOL BIOL, V30, P1058, DOI 10.1590/S1415-47572007000600005
   BIRKY CW, 1995, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V92, P11331, DOI 10.1073/pnas.92.25.11331
   BOLTON RC, 1987, J ANIM SCI, V65, P42, DOI 10.2527/jas1987.65142x
   Bowles EJ, 2008, STEM CELLS, V26, P775, DOI 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0747
   Bowles EJ, 2007, CURR TOP DEV BIOL, V77, P251, DOI 10.1016/S0070-2153(06)77010-7
   BROWN DR, 1989, J ANIM SCI, V67, P1926
   Burgstaller JP, 2015, MOL HUM REPROD, V21, P11, DOI 10.1093/molehr/gau090
   Cagnone GLM, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep23229
   Castro ALF, 2007, MOL ECOL, V16, P5183, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03597.x
   CHENOWETH PJ, 1994, AUST VET J, V71, P422, DOI 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1994.tb00961.x
   Clayton D A, 2000, Hum Reprod, V15 Suppl 2, P11
   Dokianakis E, 2014, ECOL EVOL, V4, P2633, DOI 10.1002/ece3.1069
   El Shourbagy SH, 2006, REPRODUCTION, V131, P233, DOI 10.1530/rep.1.00551
   Facucho-Oliveira JM, 2007, J CELL SCI, V120, P4025, DOI 10.1242/jcs.016972
   FELSENSTEIN J, 1981, J MOL EVOL, V17, P368, DOI 10.1007/BF01734359
   GYLLENSTEN U, 1991, NATURE, V352, P255, DOI 10.1038/352255a0
   Hansen PJ, 2014, ADV EXP MED BIOL, V752, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-8887-3_1
   Hansen PJ, 2004, ANIM REPROD SCI, V82-3, P349, DOI 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.04.011
   Hassan AA, 2009, LIVEST SCI, V125, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.03.001
   Hernández-Cerón J, 2004, J DAIRY SCI, V87, P53, DOI 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73141-0
   HEWETSON RW, 1971, AUST J AGR RES, V22, P331, DOI 10.1071/AR9710331
   Howard JT, 2014, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V58, P1665, DOI 10.1007/s00484-013-0773-5
   HUTCHISO.CA, 1974, NATURE, V251, P536, DOI 10.1038/251536a0
   Jia Shangang, 2007, Journal of Genetics and Genomics, V34, P510, DOI 10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60056-3
   Kelly RDW, 2013, STEM CELLS, V31, P703, DOI 10.1002/stem.1313
   Kelly RDW, 2012, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V40, P10124, DOI 10.1093/nar/gks770
   Kraytsberg Y, 2004, SCIENCE, V304, P981, DOI 10.1126/science.1096342
   Kuss AW, 2005, J DAIRY SCI, V88, P2246, DOI 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72900-3
   Ladoukakis ED, 2004, HEREDITY, V93, P321, DOI 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800572
   Li DM, 2008, MITOCHONDR DNA, V19, P446, DOI 10.1080/19401730802449196
   LIEN S, 1993, ANIM GENET, V24, P373, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.1993.tb00343.x
   Liu YX, 2011, MOL BIOL REP, V38, P83, DOI 10.1007/s11033-010-0080-8
   Loehr J, 2006, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V19, P419, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01027.x
   Mannen H, 2003, J ANIM SCI, V81, P68
   Martínez-Reyes I, 2016, MOL CELL, V61, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.12.002
   May-Panloup P, 2005, REPROD BIOL ENDOCRIN, V3, DOI 10.1186/1477-7827-3-65
   May-Panloup P, 2005, HUM REPROD, V20, P593, DOI 10.1093/humrep/deh667
   Mellado M, 2013, REV COLOMB CIENC PEC, V26, P193
   Mishmar D, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P171, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0136972100
   MORAN JB, 1972, J AGR SCI, V78, P173, DOI 10.1017/S0021859600068982
   Nagao Y, 1998, GENES GENET SYST, V73, P21, DOI 10.1266/ggs.73.21
   Ota S, 2000, MOL BIOL EVOL, V17, P1401, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026423
   Pick JL, 2016, FRONT ZOOL, V13, DOI 10.1186/s12983-016-0172-y
   Posada D, 1998, BIOINFORMATICS, V14, P817, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817
   Prayaga KC, 2009, ANIM PROD SCI, V49, P413, DOI 10.1071/EA08247
   Reynier P, 2001, MOL HUM REPROD, V7, P425, DOI 10.1093/molehr/7.5.425
   ROSENKRANS CF, 1993, BIOL REPROD, V49, P459, DOI 10.1095/biolreprod49.3.459
   Ruiz-Pesini E, 2004, SCIENCE, V303, P223, DOI 10.1126/science.1088434
   Santos TA, 2006, FERTIL STERIL, V85, P584, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.017
   SCHUTZ MM, 1994, LIVEST PROD SCI, V37, P283, DOI 10.1016/0301-6226(94)90123-6
   SEIFERT GW, 1971, AUST J AGR RES, V22, P839, DOI 10.1071/AR9710839
   SEIFERT GW, 1971, AUST J AGR RES, V22, P159, DOI 10.1071/AR9710159
   Shoubridge E A, 2000, Hum Reprod, V15 Suppl 2, P229
   Spikings EC, 2006, HUM REPROD UPDATE, V12, P401, DOI 10.1093/humupd/dml011
   Spikings EC, 2007, BIOL REPROD, V76, P327, DOI 10.1095/biolreprod.106.054536
   St John JC, 2010, HUM REPROD UPDATE, V16, P488, DOI 10.1093/humupd/dmq002
   Stephens PR, 2008, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V21, P77, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01467.x
   Sutarno, 2002, THERIOGENOLOGY, V57, P1603, DOI 10.1016/S0093-691X(02)00664-7
   Takeo S, 2013, J REPROD DEVELOP, V59, P174, DOI 10.1262/jrd.2012-148
   Tanaka M, 1998, LANCET, V351, P185, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)78211-8
   Thornton PK, 2010, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V15, P169, DOI 10.1007/s11027-009-9210-9
   Thundathil J, 2005, MOL REPROD DEV, V71, P405, DOI 10.1002/mrd.20260
   TORRONI A, 1994, AM J HUM GENET, V55, P760
   Tsai TS, 2016, BMC GENET, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12863-016-0375-4
   TURNER HG, 1972, AUST J AGR RES, V23, P177, DOI 10.1071/AR9720177
   Vakifahmetoglu-Norberg H, 2017, BIOCHEM BIOPH RES CO, V482, P426, DOI 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.11.088
   Wai T, 2010, BIOL REPROD, V83, P52, DOI 10.1095/biolreprod.109.080887
   Wallace DC, 1999, GENE, V238, P211, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00295-4
   YANG ZB, 1994, J MOL EVOL, V39, P105
   Zhao X, 2004, HEREDITY, V93, P399, DOI 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800516
NR 75
TC 20
Z9 20
U1 0
U2 5
PU BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
PI LONDON
PA 236 GRAYS INN RD, FLOOR 6, LONDON WC1X 8HL, ENGLAND
SN 1471-2156
J9 BMC GENET
JI BMC Genet.
PD JUN 26
PY 2017
VL 18
AR 59
DI 10.1186/s12863-017-0523-5
PG 11
WC Genetics & Heredity
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Genetics & Heredity
GA EY6SN
UT WOS:000404113600001
PM 28651540
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Liu, JH
   Chen, FG
   Xiao, L
AF Liu, Jianhui
   Chen, Fenggui
   Xiao, Lan
TI China's island management system based on qualitative content analysis:
   The choice between development and conservation
SO JOURNAL OF SEA RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Island ecological protection; Island management patterns; Island
   management system; Management and legal system; Qualitative content
   analysis
AB Due to its unique characteristics and positioning, the conservation and management of islands differ from those of mainland and marine environments. As a major maritime nation with over 11,000 islands, China's island policies reflect its comprehensive strategic needs in resource management, ecological protection, and economic development, while also illustrating the profound influence of global climate change and international marine governance on national interests, giving these policies their distinctiveness. Therefore, this study constructs a qualitative content analysis process, focusing on China's island management policies, with the aim of systematically interpreting policy texts to conduct a comprehensive analysis, revealing the evolution and characteristics of China's island management system, as well as identifying new challenges ahead. This approach provides a fresh perspective on integrated island management. Through analysis, we identified three key themes in China's island management: island development, ecological protection, and legal governance. From a longitudinal perspective, China's island management has shifted from an initial focus on development to increasingly emphasizing ecological protection. As island governance policies are gradually introduced, other management measures have also been continuously implemented, including conducting comprehensive national island resource surveys, establishing and developing nature reserves related to islands, undertaking island ecosystem restoration, and incorporating island management into unified national spatial planning. These efforts have progressively advanced China's island management toward greater specialization and legal governance. A horizontal comparison of island management systems reveals that, in China, economic development is often prioritized, especially on islands with significant development potential. This is fundamentally driven by the current stage of economic development and resource demands. Therefore, exploring a path that balances economic development with ecological protection has become a key highlight of China's island management. Over time, new challenges have emerged due to changing environmental conditions, such as sea level rise and increased extreme weather events exacerbating the vulnerability of island ecosystems and disaster risks. Strengthening island climate adaptation requires the establishment of early warning systems for extreme weather and sea level rise, enhancing flood defenses, and restoring natural ecosystems such as mangroves, coral reefs, and wetlands, which serve as protective barriers against climate risks.
C1 [Liu, Jianhui; Chen, Fenggui] Minist Nat Resources, Inst Oceanog 3, Xiamen 361005, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Jianhui; Chen, Fenggui] Fujian Prov Key Lab Marine Ecol Conservat & Restor, Xiamen 361005, Peoples R China.
   [Xiao, Lan] Minist Nat Resources, Isl Res Ctr, Pingtan 350400, Peoples R China.
C3 Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources; Ministry
   of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China; Ministry of
   Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China
RP Chen, FG (corresponding author), Minist Nat Resources, Inst Oceanog 3, Xiamen 361005, Peoples R China.
EM chenfenggui@tio.org.cn
RI Liu, Jianhui/IUQ-4072-2023
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [42076211, 42376227]
FX This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (Grant No. 42076211 & 42376227). Lastly, we extend
   our heartfelt gratitude to Yuncheng Deng, Fan Yu from the Island
   Research Center of the Ministry of Natural Resources, as well as Jianwei
   Wu from the Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural
   Resources, for their valuable contributions to this article.
CR Assarroudi A, 2018, J RES NURS, V23, P42, DOI 10.1177/1744987117741667
   Bellingham PJ, 2010, NEW ZEAL J ECOL, V34, P115
   Chen FG, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P18488, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01457-2
   Danovaro R, 2021, RESTOR ECOL, V29, DOI 10.1111/rec.13432
   Duriau VJ, 2007, ORGAN RES METHODS, V10, P5, DOI 10.1177/1094428106289252
   Elo S, 2008, J ADV NURS, V62, P107, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   Elo S, 2014, SAGE OPEN, V4, DOI 10.1177/2158244014522633
   Forbes DL, 2013, SUSTAIN SCI, V8, P327, DOI 10.1007/s11625-013-0218-4
   Forman J., 2007, Empirical Methods for Bioethics: A Primer (Advances in Bioethics), V11, P39, DOI [10.1016/S1479-3709(07)11003-7, DOI 10.1016/S1479-3709(07)11003-7]
   Fu Z., 2022, Indust. Eng. Innov. Manag., V5, P27, DOI [10.23977/ieim.2022.050304, DOI 10.23977/IEIM.2022.050304]
   Gao Y., 2013, The Comparative Study of Island Management System between China and Foreign Countries
   Gheuens J, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11040637
   Glaser M, 2018, ENVIRON CONSERV, V45, P227, DOI 10.1017/S0376892918000164
   Grydehoj A, 2015, AREA, V47, P429, DOI 10.1111/area.12207
   Ha S., 2011, A Comparative Study on the Legal System of Ecological Environmental Protection in Islands of China and Japan
   Hidayah Z, 2016, PROCD SOC BEHV, V227, P785, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.146
   Hind EJ, 2010, MAR POLICY, V34, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.04.011
   Hsieh HF, 2005, QUAL HEALTH RES, V15, P1277, DOI 10.1177/1049732305276687
   Jupiter SD, 2017, ENVIRON CONSERV, V44, P254, DOI 10.1017/S0376892917000091
   [李鑫 Li Xin], 2018, [铁道学报, Journal of the China Railway Society], V40, P97
   Liu H., 2006, Pac. J. Theol., V9
   Liu YS, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105288
   Ma ZY, 2022, FRONT MAR SCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2022.920069
   MacArthur R.H., 2001, The theory of island biogeography, P1
   Martyr-Koller R, 2021, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V50, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.05.001
   Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China, 2022, The 2022 China Natural Resources Bulletin
   Pagani-Núñez E, 2022, CONSERV BIOL, V36, DOI 10.1111/cobi.13912
   Pazmiño A, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10041228
   Powell EJ, 2019, J COAST CONSERV, V23, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11852-018-0632-y
   Qiu SS, 2017, ISL STUD J, V12, P177, DOI 10.24043/isj.20
   Rees SE, 2020, MAR POLICY, V117, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103864
   Russell JC, 2019, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V44, P31, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033245
   SECHREST S, 1995, LIBR J, V120, P36
   Song T., 2005, Ocean Dev. Manag., V3, P14, DOI DOI 10.21203/RS.3.RS-41151/V1
   Sun Q., 2018, Ocean Dev. Manag., V8, P22
   Techera E, 2019, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V177, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.04.025
   Tian Y., 2010, A Comparative Study on Island Legal System of China' Neighboring Countries
   Tran KC, 2006, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V49, P367, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.02.005
   Vaismoradi M., 2016, J NURSING ED PRACTIC, V6, P100, DOI [DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-12-16, 10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100, DOI 10.5430/JNEP.V6N5P100]
   Weeks R, 2018, CONSERV BIOL, V32, P72, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12964
   Wen Y., 2008, Chin. Fish. Econ., V26, P79
   Whittaker R. J., 2007, Island Biogeography: Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation
   Wu Y., 2009, Study on the Legal System of our country's Uninhabited islands'development and Utilization
   Xie ZL, 2019, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V167, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.10.014
   Zhang H, 2021, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01603
   Zhang H, 2020, ISL STUD J, V15, P237, DOI 10.24043/isj.105
   Zhang Z., 2018, Ocean Dev. Manag., V10, P26
   Zhao DY, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14063707
   Zhao ZL, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16167090
   Zhou D, 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V146, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.018
   Zhuang K., 2010, Ocean Dev. Manag., V27, P29
NR 51
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 5
U2 5
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1385-1101
EI 1873-1414
J9 J SEA RES
JI J. Sea Res.
PD DEC
PY 2024
VL 202
AR 102553
DI 10.1016/j.seares.2024.102553
EA NOV 2024
PG 12
WC Marine & Freshwater Biology; Oceanography
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Marine & Freshwater Biology; Oceanography
GA O0C8J
UT WOS:001367916100001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, Y
   Wang, KC
AF Zhang, Yan
   Wang, Kaicun
TI The Changing Morphology of Global Precipitation Systems during the Last
   Two Decades
SO BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Precipitation; Hydrology; Satellite observations
ID HYDROLOGICAL CYCLE; TROPICAL RAINFALL; CLIMATOLOGY; RESPONSES; INCREASE;
   CELLS; SHAPE; IMERG
AB The morphology of global precipitation systems can enhance our comprehension of precipitation patterns and the underlying physical processes. However, several unresolved issues remain in the existing studies of precipitation system morphology. This study employs Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) (IMERG)-derived precipitation system dataset to investigate the climatological and changing characteristics of global precipitation system morphology from 2001 to 2022. The results show that precipitation systems with larger scales tend to be more flattened in morphology, while no clear differences in morphological characteristics are observed across systems with different intensities. In terms of geographic distributions, a notable land-sea contrast is observed, with land systems more circular than those over oceans. Due to the impact of the Coriolis force, the orientation distribution of precipitation systems shows obvious hemispherical contrast. Precipitation systems over tropical regions are more regular in shape and more likely to be organized convective systems. During the period of 2001-22, there is a significant trend of global precipitation systems becoming more flattened and are more likely to manifest as organized convective systems. Our results also indicate that the precipitation system morphology is under combined influence of subtropical highs, lateral stretching influences of wind, and the organizing effects of moisture transport and convergence. Moreover, the increasing flattening of precipitation systems could be attributed to enhanced atmospheric stability which constrains vertical expansion and increased moisture availability which favors wider horizontal extension. This study could provide new insights into precipitation changes under global warming. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Precipitation systems exhibit distinct morphological characteristics due to varying formation mechanisms. The morphology of global precipitation systems can enhance our existing understanding of the response of precipitation to global warming, which is primarily based on time series analysis using observations collected from weather stations that are sparsely distributed. By using the latest merged satellite precipitation dataset, this study systematically explores the changing morphology of global precipitation systems. The results indicate a significant trend toward more flattened precipitation systems, which could be vital indicators of the broader impacts of global warming on atmospheric processes. Future research could be conducted regarding the specific regional effects of these morphological changes, which will be crucial for improving weather forecasting and climate adaptation strategies.
C1 [Zhang, Yan] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Global Change & Earth Syst Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Kaicun] Peking Univ, Inst Carbon Neutral, Sino French Inst Earth Syst Sci, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.
C3 Beijing Normal University; Peking University
RP Wang, KC (corresponding author), Peking Univ, Inst Carbon Neutral, Sino French Inst Earth Syst Sci, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.
EM kcwang@pku.edu.cn
RI Wang, Kaicun/F-7813-2012
OI Wang, Kaicun/0000-0002-7414-5400
FU National Key Research and Development Program of China [2022YFF0801302];
   National Natural Science Foundation of China [41930970]
FX This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development
   Program of China (2022YFF0801302) and the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (41930970). The authors thank the NASA Goddard Space
   Flight Center's Precipitation Measurement Missions (PMM) and
   Precipitation Processing System (PPS) teams, which developed and
   computed IMERG as a contribution to GPM.
CR Ashouri H, 2015, B AM METEOROL SOC, V96, P69, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00068.1
   Asong ZE, 2017, J HYDROMETEOROL, V18, P1033, DOI [10.1175/jhm-d-16-0187.1, 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0187.1]
   Ayat H, 2021, J HYDROMETEOROL, V22, P43, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-20-0187.1
   Bao JW, 2024, SCI ADV, V10, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.adj6801
   Barnolas M, 2010, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V14, P129, DOI 10.5194/hess-14-129-2010
   Basso B, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-21763-7
   Berg P, 2013, NAT GEOSCI, V6, P181, DOI 10.1038/ngeo1731
   Chang W, 2016, J CLIMATE, V29, P8355, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0844.1
   Chen YL, 2021, ADV ATMOS SCI, V38, P677, DOI 10.1007/s00376-020-0233-1
   Chou C, 2013, NAT GEOSCI, V6, P263, DOI [10.1038/NGEO1744, 10.1038/ngeo1744]
   Chou C, 2009, J CLIMATE, V22, P1982, DOI 10.1175/2008JCLI2471.1
   Cui WJ, 2024, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V129, DOI 10.1029/2023JD039920
   Cui WJ, 2020, J HYDROMETEOROL, V21, P39, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-19-0123.1
   Dezfuli AK, 2017, J HYDROMETEOROL, V18, P2817, DOI [10.1175/JHM-D-17-0139.1, 10.1175/jhm-d-17-0139.1]
   Fairman JG, 2017, J HYDROMETEOROL, V18, P1595, DOI [10.1175/JHM-D-16-0222.1, 10.1175/jhm-d-16-0222.1]
   Fairman JG, 2016, MON WEATHER REV, V144, P4553, DOI 10.1175/MWR-D-16-0015.1
   Feral L, 2000, PHYS CHEM EARTH PT B, V25, P1073, DOI 10.1016/S1464-1909(00)00155-6
   Fu YF, 2020, J METEOROL RES-PRC, V34, P1129, DOI 10.1007/s13351-020-0035-5
   Guinard K, 2015, INT J CLIMATOL, V35, P596, DOI 10.1002/joc.4006
   Held IM, 2006, J CLIMATE, V19, P5686, DOI 10.1175/JCLI3990.1
   Hersbach H, 2020, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V146, P1999, DOI 10.1002/qj.3803
   Hou AY, 2014, B AM METEOROL SOC, V95, P701, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00164.1
   HOUZE RA, 1990, MON WEATHER REV, V118, P613, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<0613:MOOSRI>2.0.CO;2
   HOUZE RA, 1981, RADIO SCI, V16, P671, DOI 10.1029/RS016i005p00671
   Hu ZY, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V121, P5648, DOI 10.1002/2016JD024781
   Huang TT, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13152920
   Huffman G. J., 2024, V07 IMERG release notes
   Huffman GJ, 2015, Algorithm Theor Basis Doc Version
   Islam MA, 2020, HYDROLOG SCI J, V65, P1112, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2020.1730845
   Jiang Q, 2021, J HYDROL, V595, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125660
   Joyce RJ, 2011, J HYDROMETEOROL, V12, P1547, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-11-022.1
   Karklinsky M, 2006, METEOROL Z, V15, P513, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0153
   Kummerow C, 1998, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V15, P809, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015<0809:TTRMMT>2.0.CO;2
   Lan CW, 2024, J CLIMATE, V37, P2881, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0287.1
   LEMONE MA, 1984, J ATMOS SCI, V41, P1914, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041<1914:MFBLOC>2.0.CO;2
   Li PX, 2023, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V50, DOI 10.1029/2023GL103595
   Li RZ, 2021, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V126, DOI 10.1029/2020JD033692
   Li Z, 2020, J HYDROMETEOROL, V21, P2759, DOI [10.1175/jhm-d-20-0041.1, 10.1175/JHM-D-20-0041.1]
   Li Z, 2021, J HYDROL, V594, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.125975
   Liu CT, 2015, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V42, P3591, DOI 10.1002/2015GL063776
   Liu CT, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V118, P453, DOI 10.1029/2012JD018409
   Lochbihler K, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P8629, DOI 10.1002/2017GL074857
   LOEHRER SM, 1995, MON WEATHER REV, V123, P600, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<0600:SPAPLC>2.0.CO;2
   Mann HB, 1945, ECONOMETRICA, V13, P245, DOI 10.2307/1907187
   Mao YN, 2022, J CLIMATE, V35, P227, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0324.1
   Matte D, 2022, CLIM DYNAM, V58, P1861, DOI 10.1007/s00382-021-05998-0
   Moseley C, 2016, NAT GEOSCI, V9, P748, DOI [10.1038/NGEO2789, 10.1038/ngeo2789]
   Nesbitt SW, 2006, MON WEATHER REV, V134, P2702, DOI 10.1175/MWR3200.1
   Nicholson SE, 2018, B AM METEOROL SOC, V99, P337, DOI [10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0287.1, 10.1175/bams-d-16-0287.1]
   Prein AF, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P880, DOI 10.1038/s41558-017-0007-7
   Qin S, 2021, ATMOS RES, V264, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105872
   Schneider T, 2014, NATURE, V513, P45, DOI 10.1038/nature13636
   Schumacher RS, 2020, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V1, P300, DOI 10.1038/s43017-020-0057-7
   Seager R, 2010, J CLIMATE, V23, P4651, DOI 10.1175/2010JCLI3655.1
   SEN PK, 1968, J AM STAT ASSOC, V63, P1379
   Sharmila S, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P730, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0227-5
   Skofronick-Jackson G, 2017, B AM METEOROL SOC, V98, P1679, DOI [10.1175/bams-d-15-00306.1, 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00306.1]
   Song FF, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, P605, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-01066-x
   Song FF, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P787, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0244-4
   Tan J, 2019, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V36, P2471, DOI 10.1175/JTECH-D-19-0114.1
   Tang GQ, 2020, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V240, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111697
   Tang GQ, 2016, J HYDROL, V533, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.008
   Tu SF, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22304-y
   Vihma T, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V121, P586, DOI 10.1002/2015JG003132
   Wentz FJ, 2007, SCIENCE, V317, P233, DOI 10.1126/science.1140746
   Zhang Y, 2023, J HYDROL, V616, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128768
   Zhang Y, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abf394
   Zhao Y, 2022, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V127, DOI 10.1029/2021JD035765
   Zhou YP, 2019, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V124, P10344, DOI 10.1029/2019JD030449
NR 69
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 14
U2 14
PU AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
PI BOSTON
PA 45 BEACON ST, BOSTON, MA 02108-3693, UNITED STATES
SN 0003-0007
EI 1520-0477
J9 B AM METEOROL SOC
JI Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc.
PD OCT
PY 2024
VL 105
IS 10
BP E1861
EP E1880
DI 10.1175/BAMS-D-23-0106.1
PG 20
WC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA J3T8D
UT WOS:001336328000003
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Mohamed, J
   Abdi, MJ
   Mohamed, AI
   Muhumed, MA
   Abdeeq, BA
   Abdi, AA
   Abdilahi, MM
   Ali, DA
AF Mohamed, Jama
   Abdi, Mukhtar Jibril
   Mohamed, Ahmed Ismail
   Muhumed, Mohamed Aden
   Abdeeq, Barkhad Aden
   Abdi, Abdinasir Ali
   Abdilahi, Mohamed Mussa
   Ali, Dahir Abdi
TI Predicting the short and long term effects of food price inflation,
   armed conflicts, and climate variability on global acute malnutrition in
   Somalia
SO JOURNAL OF HEALTH POPULATION AND NUTRITION
LA English
DT Article
DE Global acute malnutrition; Food price inflation; Armed conflicts;
   Climate variability; Somalia
ID AUTOREGRESSIVE DISTRIBUTED LAG
AB Background Malnutrition poses a substantial challenge in Somalia, impacting approximately 1.8 million children. This critical issue is exacerbated by a multifaceted interplay of factors. Consequently, this study seeks to examine the long-term and short-term effects of armed conflicts, food price inflation, and climate variability on global acute malnutrition in Somalia.Methods The study utilized secondary data spanning from January 2015 to December 2022, sourced from relevant databases. Two distinct analytical approaches were employed to comprehensively investigate the dynamics of global acute malnutrition in Somalia. Firstly, dynamic autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) simulations were applied, allowing for a nuanced understanding of the short and long-term effects of armed conflicts, food price inflation, and climate variability on malnutrition. Additionally, the study employed kernel-based regularized least squares, a sophisticated statistical technique, to further enhance the robustness of the findings. The analysis was conducted using STATA version 17.Results In the short run, armed conflicts and food price inflation exhibit positive associations with global acute malnutrition, particularly in conflict-prone areas and during inflationary periods. Moreover, climatic variables, specifically temperature and rainfall, demonstrate positive associations. It is important to note that temperature lacks a statistically significant relationship with global acute malnutrition in the short run. In the long run, armed conflicts and food price inflation maintain persistent impacts on global acute malnutrition, as confirmed by the dynamic ARDL simulations model. Furthermore, both temperature and rainfall continue to show positive associations with global acute malnutrition, but it is worth noting that temperature still exhibits a non-significant relationship. The results from kernel-based regularized least squares were consistent, further enhancing the robustness of the findings.Conclusions Increased armed conflicts, food price inflation, temperature, and rainfall were associated with increased global acute malnutrition. Strategies such as stabilizing conflict-prone regions, diplomatic interventions, and peace-building initiatives are crucial, along with measures to control food price inflation. Implementing climate adaptation strategies is vital to counter temperature changes and fluctuating rainfall patterns, emphasizing the need for resilience-building. Policymakers and humanitarian organizations can leverage these insights to design targeted interventions, focusing on conflict resolution, food security, and climate resilience to enhance Somalia's overall nutritional well-being.
C1 [Mohamed, Jama] Univ Hargeisa, Coll Appl & Nat Sci, Fac Stat & Data Sci, Hargeisa, Somalia.
   [Abdi, Mukhtar Jibril] Hargeisa Water Agcy, Ctr Ground & Surface Water Management, Hargeisa, Somalia.
   [Mohamed, Ahmed Ismail] Univ Hargeisa, Coll Appl & Nat Sci, Fac Nutr & Food Sci, Hargeisa, Somalia.
   [Muhumed, Mohamed Aden] Minist Planning & Dev, Dept Planning, Hargeisa, Somalia.
   [Abdeeq, Barkhad Aden] Save Children Int, Dept Child Survival, Hargeisa, Somalia.
   [Abdi, Abdinasir Ali] Univ Hargeisa, Coll Business & Publ Adm, Hargeisa, Somalia.
   [Abdilahi, Mohamed Mussa] Univ Hargeisa, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Hargeisa, Somalia.
   [Ali, Dahir Abdi] SIMAD Univ, Fac Econ, Mogadishu, Somalia.
C3 Save the Children
RP Mohamed, J (corresponding author), Univ Hargeisa, Coll Appl & Nat Sci, Fac Stat & Data Sci, Hargeisa, Somalia.
EM jama.mohamed@live.co.uk
RI Mohamed, Ahmed/JGE-1284-2023; Mohamed, Jama/ADZ-1878-2022
OI Mohamed, Jama/0000-0002-7504-7642; Mohamed, Ahmed
   Ismail/0000-0001-6131-874X
CR Baker RE, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-74942-9
   Brinkman HJ, 2010, J NUTR, V140, p153S, DOI 10.3945/jn.109.110767
   Burki TK, 2013, LANCET, V382, P587, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61732-8
   Dahab R, 2020, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-08665-x
   Elayouty A, 2022, Does climate change affect child malnutrition in the Nile Basin?
   Fadare O., 2019, Effect of conflict and food price shocks on calorie intake and acute malnutrition in nigeria: A micro-panel data analysis, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.WDS.2024.100158
   Fanzo J, 2021, AM J CLIN NUTR, V113, P7, DOI 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa313
   Fousekis P, 2016, ECON MODEL, V52, P499, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.030
   Grace K, 2012, APPL GEOGR, V35, P405, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.06.017
   Hainmueller J, 2014, POLIT ANAL, V22, P143, DOI 10.1093/pan/mpt019
   Headey D, 2023, NAT COMMUN, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-41543-9
   Homeida A, 2023, BMJ GLOB HEALTH, V8, DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014152
   Howell E, 2020, MATERN CHILD NUTR, V16, DOI 10.1111/mcn.12968
   IPC, 2023, Acute Malnutrition Situation in Somalia
   Jordan S, 2018, STATA J, V18, P902, DOI 10.1177/1536867X1801800409
   Kinyoki DK, 2017, BMJ GLOB HEALTH, V2, DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000262
   Kinyoki DK, 2015, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V18, P3125, DOI 10.1017/S1368980015001913
   Kripfganz S, 2023, STATA J, V23, P983, DOI 10.1177/1536867X231212434
   Kripfganz S, 2021, OXFORD B ECON STAT, V82, P1456, DOI 10.1111/obes.12377
   Kumar P., 2018, INT J CHEM STUDIES, V6, P124
   Mank I, 2021, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.693281
   Muttarak R, 2019, BMJ GLOB HEALTH, V4, DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001215
   Njatang DK, 2023, HELIYON, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21672
   Pesaran MH, 2001, J APPL ECONOMET, V16, P289, DOI 10.1002/jae.616
   Randell H, 2020, SOC SCI MED, V261, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113234
   Sadikeen SS, 2023, Impact of food price inflation on malnutrition in under five aged children in Bangladesh
   Sankaran A, 2019, HELIYON, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01904
   Thiede BC, 2020, SOC SCI MED, V265, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113298
   Thiede BC, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102192
   van der Merwe E, 2022, FOOD POLICY, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102281
   ,, 2020, The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2020: transforming food systems for affordable healthy diets, DOI 10.4060/ca9692en
NR 31
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 4
U2 4
PU BMC
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND
SN 1606-0997
EI 2072-1315
J9 J HEALTH POPUL NUTR
JI J. Heatlh Popul. Nutr.
PD MAY 17
PY 2024
VL 43
IS 1
AR 68
DI 10.1186/s41043-024-00557-9
PG 18
WC Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational
   Health
GA RJ8O5
UT WOS:001227390200001
PM 38760867
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sian, KTCLK
   Sagero, P
   Ongoma, V
AF Sian, Kenny Thiam Choy Lim Kam
   Sagero, Philip
   Ongoma, Victor
TI Precipitation, temperature and potential evapotranspiration for
   1991-2020 climate normals over Africa
SO THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
ID SPATIAL VARIABILITY; SAHARA; LAND
AB Precipitation and temperature variability and change across Africa significantly impact the continent's key socio-economic sectors such as agriculture, water resources, health and infrastructure development. Despite experiencing the highest warming in the past decades, Africa's most recent climate normals are yet to be documented. This study presents the latest climate normals, 1991-2020, as defined by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) for key variables: precipitation, temperature (mean, minimum and maximum), and potential evaporation (PET). Analysing monthly observational data from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) version 4.07, we examine the spatio-temporal variability of these variables over Africa and its nine climate sub-regions during 1991-2020, and changes relative to the baseline climate normals (1961-1990) and previous normal periods (1971-2000 and 1981-2010). We employ anomaly and trend analysis to investigate changes during the different periods, while empirical orthogonal function (EOF) is used to identify dominant seasonal patterns. Distinct precipitation characteristics emerge across the sub-regions, with the Mediterranean (MED) and Madagascar (MDG) exhibiting a consistent decreasing trend since 1961-1990, while other regions experience an increase compared to the last normal period (1981-2010). The Sahara (SAH), Western Africa (WAF), and Northern Eastern Africa (NEAF) show higher precipitation during 1991-2020 than in 1961-1990. Mean temperature shows an overall increase across Africa, with MED, SAH and Eastern Southern Africa (ESAF) recording the highest temperature rise of 0.79, 1.71 and 0.68 degrees C, respectively, compared to 1961-1990. Similar trends are reflected in minimum and maximum temperatures. PET patterns align closely with temperature changes, particularly in SAH, where PET increases by 35.7 mm during the last climate normals compared to 1961-1990. The EOF results agree with the climatological means. However, a decrease in the percentage variance of the dominant modes across the periods for temperature and PET suggests possible shifts in climate oscillations or dynamics. This study contributes vital insights into observed and expected climate trends over Africa, benefiting the scientific community, stakeholders, and end-users. The results emphasise the urgency of climate adaptation measures in Africa and underscore the necessity for proactive strategies to address climate change impacts.
C1 [Sian, Kenny Thiam Choy Lim Kam] Wuxi Univ, Sch Atmospher Sci & Remote Sensing, Wuxi 214105, Peoples R China.
   [Sagero, Philip] Univ South Pacific, Sch Agr Geog Environm Ocean & Nat Sci, Laucala Campus,Private Bag, Suva, Fiji.
   [Ongoma, Victor] Mohammed VI Polytech Univ UM6P, Int Water Res Inst IWRI, Lot 660, Ben Guerir 43150, Ben Guerir, Morocco.
C3 Wuxi University; University of the South Pacific; Mohammed VI
   Polytechnic University
RP Sian, KTCLK (corresponding author), Wuxi Univ, Sch Atmospher Sci & Remote Sensing, Wuxi 214105, Peoples R China.
EM kennlks@gmail.com
RI Ongoma, Victor/AAE-2500-2019; Lim Kam Sian, Kenny/AAW-8241-2021
OI Ongoma, Victor/0000-0002-5110-2870; Sagero, Philip/0000-0001-9939-7826;
   Lim Kam Sian, Kenny Thiam Choy/0000-0002-8328-8745
CR Akinsanola AA, 2017, METEOROL ATMOS PHYS, V129, P669, DOI 10.1007/s00703-016-0493-6
   [Anonymous], 2022, Africa's Urbanisation Dynamics 2022: The Economic Power of Africa's Cities, DOI DOI 10.1787/3834ED5B-EN
   [Anonymous], 2016, Tech. Rep., DOI [10.1787/agr_outlook-2016-5-en, DOI 10.1787/AGR_OUTLOOK-2016-5-EN]
   [Anonymous], 2017, WMO Guidelines on the Calculation of Climate Normals
   [Anonymous], 1989, WCDP-No. 10, WMO-TD/No. 341
   Arguez A, 2011, B AM METEOROL SOC, V92, P699, DOI 10.1175/2010BAMS2955.1
   Assamnew AD, 2023, INT J CLIMATOL, V43, P17, DOI 10.1002/joc.7697
   Biasutti M, 2019, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V10, DOI 10.1002/wcc.591
   Ceccherini G, 2017, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V17, P115, DOI 10.5194/nhess-17-115-2017
   Dinku T, 2008, INT J CLIMATOL, V28, P1627, DOI 10.1002/joc.1669
   Dinku T, 2022, FRONT CLIM, V3, DOI 10.3389/fclim.2021.787519
   Griffiths JF., 1972, World Survey of Climatology, P602
   Harris I, 2020, SCI DATA, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3
   Harris IC, 2023, CRU TS4.07: Climatic Research Unit (CRU) Time-Series (TS) version 4.07 of high-resolution gridded data of month-by-month variation in climate (Jan. 1901- Dec. 2022)
   Huebner L., 2022, J Geosci Environ Prot, V10, P94, DOI [10.4236/gep.2022.102007, DOI 10.4236/GEP.2022.102007]
   HULME M, 1992, INT J CLIMATOL, V12, P685, DOI 10.1002/joc.3370120703
   Ilori OW, 2020, EARTH SYST ENVIRON, V4, P493, DOI 10.1007/s41748-020-00174-6
   Iturbide M, 2020, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V12, P2959, DOI 10.5194/essd-12-2959-2020
   Koné B, 2018, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V9, P1261, DOI 10.5194/esd-9-1261-2018
   Krakauer NY, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/2/024014
   Leemans R, 1990, Working Paper No. WP-90.-41
   LEGATES DR, 1990, INT J CLIMATOL, V10, P111, DOI 10.1002/joc.3370100202
   Leroux M., 1983, The Climate of Tropical Africa, P650
   Livezey RE, 2007, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V46, P1759, DOI 10.1175/2007JAMC1666.1
   Lorenz E. N., 1956, Science Report 1
   Lüdecke HJ, 2021, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V34, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100795
   Malhi Y, 2013, PHILOS T R SOC B, V368, DOI [10.1098/rstb.2012.0312, 10.1098/rstb.2012.0293]
   Mumuni S, 2023, COGENT FOOD AGR, V9, DOI 10.1080/23311932.2023.2171830
   Nicholson SE, 2000, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V26, P137, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8181(00)00040-0
   Nicholson SE, 2018, INT J CLIMATOL, V38, P3770, DOI 10.1002/joc.5530
   Nooni IK, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18136760
   Ongoma V, 2017, METEOROL ATMOS PHYS, V129, P131, DOI 10.1007/s00703-016-0462-0
   Onyutha C, 2021, ATMOSFERA, V34, P267, DOI [10.20937/atm.52788, 10.20937/ATM.52788]
   Parker LE, 2020, PLANT SCI, V295, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110397
   Pausata FSR, 2020, ONE EARTH, V2, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.03.002
   Pickson RB, 2022, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V24, P4387, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01621-8
   Pogacar T, 2018, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V62, P1251, DOI 10.1007/s00484-018-1530-6
   Rigal A, 2019, CLIM DYNAM, V53, P275, DOI 10.1007/s00382-018-4584-6
   Scherrer SC, 2006, INT J CLIMATOL, V26, P565, DOI 10.1002/joc.1270
   SEN PK, 1968, J AM STAT ASSOC, V63, P1379
   Sindikubwabo C., 2018, Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, V8, P262, DOI 10.4236/acs.2018.82017
   Summary for Policymakers, 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001, P2
   Sun WY, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P9870, DOI 10.1029/2019GL082116
   TANNER CB, 1960, J GEOPHYS RES, V65, P3391, DOI 10.1029/JZ065i010p03391
   Terry N, 2023, ENERG BUILDINGS, V292, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113183
   Trisos CH., 2022, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, P1285, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781009325844.011, 10.1017/9781009325844.011]
   WALSH JE, 1980, MON WEATHER REV, V108, P615, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<0615:AQAOMA>2.0.CO;2
   Wang R, 2022, INT J CLIMATOL, V42, P10126, DOI 10.1002/joc.7887
   World Meteorological Organization, 2015, WMO-No.1157
   World Meteorological Organization, 2007, WCDMP-61, WMO-TD/1377
   Zhang H, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-88162-2
   Zhong ZQ, 2023, NAT COMMUN, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-43007-6
NR 52
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 5
PU SPRINGER WIEN
PI Vienna
PA Prinz-Eugen-Strasse 8-10, A-1040 Vienna, AUSTRIA
SN 0177-798X
EI 1434-4483
J9 THEOR APPL CLIMATOL
JI Theor. Appl. Climatol.
PD 2024 APR 9
PY 2024
DI 10.1007/s00704-024-04963-1
EA APR 2024
PG 18
WC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA NG5Z7
UT WOS:001199325600001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Borg, MA
   Xiang, JJ
   Anikeeva, O
   Ostendorf, B
   Varghese, B
   Dear, K
   Pisaniello, D
   Hansen, A
   Zander, K
   Sim, MR
   Bi, P
AF Borg, Matthew A.
   Xiang, Jianjun
   Anikeeva, Olga
   Ostendorf, Bertram
   Varghese, Blesson
   Dear, Keith
   Pisaniello, Dino
   Hansen, Alana
   Zander, Kerstin
   Sim, Malcolm R.
   Bi, Peng
TI Current and projected heatwave-attributable occupational injuries,
   illnesses, and associated economic burden in Australia
SO ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Attributable risk; Compensation claims; Global warming; Heatwaves;
   Occupational costs; Worker safety
ID WORK-RELATED INJURY; AMBIENT-TEMPERATURES; CASE-CROSSOVER; HOT WEATHER;
   IMPACT; RISK; EXPOSURE; STRESS
AB Introduction: The costs of global warming are substantial. These include expenses from occupational illnesses and injuries (OIIs), which have been associated with increases during heatwaves. This study estimated retrospective and projected future heatwave-attributable OIIs and their costs in Australia.
   Materials and methods: Climate and workers ' compensation claims data were extracted from seven Australian capital cities representing OIIs from July 2005 to June 2018. Heatwaves were defined using the Excess Heat Factor. OIIs and associated costs were estimated separately per city and pooled to derive national estimates. Results were projected to 2030 (2016-2045) and 2050 (2036-2065).
   Results: The risk of OIIs and associated costs increased during heatwaves, with the risk increasing during severe and particularly extreme heatwaves. Of all OIIs, 0.13% (95% empirical confidence interval [eCI]: 0.11-0.16%) were heatwave-attributable, equivalent to 120 (95%eCI:70-181) OIIs annually. 0.25% of costs were heatwaveattributable (95%eCI: 0.18-0.34%), equal to $AU4.3 (95%eCI: 1.4-7.4) million annually. Estimates of heatwaveattributable OIIs by 2050, under Representative Concentration Pathway [RCP]4.5 and RCP8.5, were 0.17% (95% eCI: 0.10-0.27%) and 0.23% (95%eCI: 0.13-0.37%), respectively. National costs estimates for 2030 under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 were 0.13% (95%eCI: 0.27-0.46%) and 0.04% (95%eCI: 0.66-0.60), respectively. These estimates for extreme heatwaves were 0.04% (95%eCI: 0.02-0.06%) and 0.04% (95%eCI: 0.01-0.07), respectively. Cost-AFs in 2050 were, under RCP4.5, 0.127% (95%eCI: 0.27-0.46) for all heatwaves and 0.04% (95%eCI: 0.01-0.09%) for extreme heatwaves. Attributable fractions were approximately similar to baseline when assuming theoretical climate adaptation.
   Discussion: Heatwaves represent notable and preventable portions of preventable OIIs and economic burden. OIIs are likely to increase in the future, and costs during extreme heatwaves in 2030. Workplace and public health policies aimed at heat adaptation can reduce heat-attributable morbidity and costs.
C1 [Borg, Matthew A.; Xiang, Jianjun; Anikeeva, Olga; Varghese, Blesson; Dear, Keith; Pisaniello, Dino; Hansen, Alana; Bi, Peng] Univ Adelaide, Sch Publ Hlth, 50 Rundle Mall, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
   [Xiang, Jianjun] Fujian Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Prevent Med, 1 Xue Yuan Rd,Minhou Campus, Fuzhou 350122, Fujian, Peoples R China.
   [Ostendorf, Bertram] Univ Adelaide, Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, 57 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
   [Zander, Kerstin] Charles Darwin Univ, Northern Inst, Ellengowan Dr, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia.
   [Sim, Malcolm R.] Monash Univ, Alfred Hosp, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia.
   [Bi, Peng] 50 Rundle Mall, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
C3 University of Adelaide; Fujian Medical University; University of
   Adelaide; Charles Darwin University; Florey Institute of Neuroscience &
   Mental Health; Monash University
RP Bi, P (corresponding author), 50 Rundle Mall, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
EM peng.bi@adelaide.edu.au
RI Anikeeva, Olga/L-5130-2019; Zander, Kerstin/M-2888-2013; Borg,
   Matthew/T-5544-2019
OI Dear, Keith/0000-0002-0788-7404; Zander, Kerstin/0000-0002-2237-1801;
   Pisaniello, Dino/0000-0002-4156-0608; Ostendorf,
   Bertram/0000-0002-5868-3567; VARGHESE, BLESSON/0000-0003-2974-7282;
   Borg, Matthew/0000-0003-4741-553X
FU Australian Research Council (ARC); University of Adelaide Faculty of
   Health Sciences Divisional Scholarship; Australian Research Council
   (ARC); University of Adelaide Faculty of Health Sciences Divisional
   Scholarship;  [DP190102869]
FX The authors thank Dr John Nairn, Professor Lisa Alexander, Syeda Hira
   Fatima, and A/Prof Peter Smith for their advice with utilizing EHF,
   advice for usage of projected climate data, assistance with spatial
   analysis, and for providing their ANZSCO-NOC cross-walk version for
   cross-checking, respectively. This publication uses workers'
   compensation claims data supplied by Safe Work Australia and has been
   compiled in collaboration with state, territory and Commonwealth
   workers' compensation regulators. The views expressed are the
   responsibility of the authors and are not necessarily the views of Safe
   Work Australia or the state, territory and Commonwealth workers'
   compensation regulators. The authors acknowledge the World Climate
   Research Programme's Working Group on Coupled Modeling, which is
   responsible for CMIP, and we thank the climate modeling groups (listed
   at https://www.clima
   techangeinaustralia.gov.au/en/obtain-data/application-ready-data/e
   ight-climate-models-data/) for producing and making available their
   model output for projected climate data. For CMIP the U.S. Department of
   Energy's Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison
   provides coordinating support and led development of software
   infra-structure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth
   System Science Portals. This project was supported by the Australian
   Research Council (ARC Discovery Project Grant: DP190102869). Author
   Matthew Borg was supported by a University of Adelaide Faculty of Health
   Sciences Divisional Scholarship.
CR Adélaïde L, 2022, EUR J HEALTH ECON, V23, P119, DOI 10.1007/s10198-021-01357-2
   Adnan MSG, 2022, ENVIRON RES, V213, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113703
   [Anonymous], Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations
   Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2018, Projected Population, Components of Change and Summary Statistics - Australia, State/territory, Greater Capital City and Rest of State, 2017 (Base) to 2066, Data Cube: Excel Spreadsheet
   Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2022, Labour Force, Labour Force
   Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2020, ABOUT US
   Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2020, AUSTR STAT GEOGR STA, V3
   Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021, Consumer Price Index
   Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2018, WORK REL INJ
   Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2022, Australian Industry
   Australian Safety and Compensation Council, 2009, Type of Occurrence Classification System
   Bettio Lynette, 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, V131, P53
   Binazzi A, 2019, AM J IND MED, V62, P233, DOI 10.1002/ajim.22946
   Borg M., 2022, Public Holidays in Australian Capital Cities from 2004 to 2023, DOI [10.25909/6311-7a0dcb3f, DOI 10.25909/6311-7A0DCB3F]
   Borg M., 2022, School Holidays in Australian Capital Cities from 2004 to 2023, DOI [10.25909/6311-7b3bc760, DOI 10.25909/6311-7B3BC760]
   Borg Matthew, 2022, Figshare, DOI 10.25909/63a2d38c1b295
   Borg M, 2019, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V63, P435, DOI 10.1007/s00484-019-01674-5
   Borg MA, 2021, ENVIRON RES, V195, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110781
   Carleton TA, 2016, SCIENCE, V353, DOI 10.1126/science.aad9837
   Collie A, 2016, BMJ OPEN, V6, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010910
   Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, 2021, Eight model Sub set for Application Ready Data
   Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, 2021, Download "NRM" Datasets
   Dunn P.K, 2017, EVALUATION TWEEDIE E
   Dunn P.K, 2018, Springer Texts in Statistics, V1st, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-0118-7
   Dunn PK, 2005, STAT COMPUT, V15, P267, DOI 10.1007/s11222-005-4070-y
   Ebi KL, 2021, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V42, P293, DOI 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-012420-105026
   Fatima SH, 2023, ENVIRON RES, V228, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115855
   Fatima SH, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V826, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153945
   García-León D, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-26050-z
   Gasparrini A, 2015, LANCET, V386, P369, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62114-0
   Gasparrini A, 2017, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V1, pE360, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30156-0
   Gasparrini A, 2014, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-14-55
   Gasparrini A, 2011, J STAT SOFTW, V43, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v043.i08
   Gasparrini A, 2011, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V22, P68, DOI 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181fdcd99
   Gray SE, 2017, INJURY, V48, P2470, DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2017.09.019
   Higgins JPT, 2002, STAT MED, V21, P1539, DOI 10.1002/sim.1186
   International Labour Organization, 2010, Welcome to the ISCO Website
   Jakob D., 2017, The Bulletin of The Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society, V30, P16
   Jay O, 2021, LANCET, V398, P709, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01209-5
   Kurz CF, 2017, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12874-017-0445-y
   Lytras T., 2019, FluMoDL: Influenza Attributable Mortality with Distributed Lag Models
   Ma R, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V666, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.201
   Martínez-Solanas E, 2018, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V126, DOI 10.1289/EHP2590
   McCarthy RB, 2019, J OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V61, P724, DOI 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001639
   McInnes JA, 2017, SCAND J WORK ENV HEA, V43, P86, DOI 10.5271/sjweh.3602
   McInnes JA, 2018, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V62, P153, DOI 10.1007/s00484-017-1435-9
   Nairn J., 2009, Defining and predicting excessive heat events, a national system
   Nairn J, 2022, CLIM SERV, V27, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2022.100315
   Nairn J, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15112494
   Nairn JR, 2015, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V12, P227, DOI 10.3390/ijerph120100227
   Newnam S, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V112, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.10.028
   Notley SR, 2019, J APPL PHYSIOL, V126, P286, DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.00735.2018
   Notley SR, 2017, EXP PHYSIOL, V102, P545, DOI 10.1113/EP086112
   Oliveira A, 2022, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2022.100455
   Orlov Anton, 2019, Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, V3, P191, DOI 10.1007/s41885-019-00044-0
   Raats M. M., 1992, Food Quality and Preference, V3, P89, DOI 10.1016/0950-3293(91)90028-D
   Rai M, 2022, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V6, pE782, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00195-4
   Rothfusz L.P., 1990, HEAT INDEX EQUATION
   Royé D, 2020, ENVIRON RES, V182, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2019.109027
   Safe Work Australia, 2022, Report
   Safe Work Australia, 2019, National Data Set for Compensation Based Statistics, Vthird
   Safe Work Australia, 2021, Managing the risks of working in heat
   Safe Work Australia, 2019, Report
   Safe Work Australia, 2022, Workers' Compensation
   Sera F, 2019, STAT MED, V38, P5429, DOI 10.1002/sim.8362
   Smith Peter M., 2013, Report
   Smyth G.K., 2002, ASTIN B J IAA, V32, P143, DOI [10.2143/AST.32.1.1020, DOI 10.2143/AST.32.1.1020]
   Smyth GK, 2002, J COMPUT GRAPH STAT, V11, P836, DOI 10.1198/106186002871
   Statistics Canada, 2019, National Occupational Classification (NOC) 2016
   Su YA, 2020, ENVIRON RES, V186, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109532
   van Aert RCM, 2021, RES SYNTH METHODS, V12, P429, DOI 10.1002/jrsm.1490
   Varghese BM, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V687, P898, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.098
   Varghese BM, 2019, J EXPO SCI ENV EPID, V29, P821, DOI 10.1038/s41370-019-0138-1
   Varghese BM, 2019, ENVIRON RES, V170, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.024
   Varghese BM, 2018, SAFETY SCI, V110, P380, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.027
   Venugopal V, 2016, GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, V9, DOI 10.3402/gha.v9.31945
   Vicedo-Cabrera AM, 2019, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V30, P321, DOI 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000982
   Wondmagegn BY, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V781, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146815
   Wondmagegn BY, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V657, P608, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.479
   Wood SN, 2017, J AM STAT ASSOC, V112, P1199, DOI 10.1080/01621459.2016.1195744
   Wood SN, 2011, J ROY STAT SOC B, V73, P3, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x
   World Meteorological Organization, 2018, Guide to Climatological Practices WMO No. 100 (Report
   Xiang JJ, 2016, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-3241-4
   Zhao MZ, 2021, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V167, DOI 10.1007/s10584-021-03160-7
NR 84
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 8
U2 21
PU ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
PI SAN DIEGO
PA 525 B ST, STE 1900, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4495 USA
SN 0013-9351
EI 1096-0953
J9 ENVIRON RES
JI Environ. Res.
PD NOV 1
PY 2023
VL 236
AR 116852
DI 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116852
EA AUG 2023
PN 2
PG 15
WC Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational
   Health
GA S2QJ8
UT WOS:001069665000001
PM 37558113
OA hybrid, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Palliwoda, J
   Haase, A
   Suppee, C
   Rink, D
   Priess, JA
AF Palliwoda, Julia
   Haase, Annegret
   Suppee, Constantin
   Rink, Dieter
   Priess, Joerg A.
TI Visions for development and management of urban green and blue
   infrastructure: a citizen's perspective
SO ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE compact green city; citizen participation; land use change; planning;
   urban green spaces
ID ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; HUMAN HEALTH; BIODIVERSITY;
   CITIES; ECOLOGY; SPACE; PARKS; CHALLENGES; BENEFITS
AB Ongoing urbanization leads to problems such as densification, loss of biodiversity, and social injustice in cities. For increasing urban populations, green???blue infrastructure (GBI) is an important element in compact cities contributing to human health, well-being, and the provision of important ecosystem services. We analyzed responses from two open-ended questions about visions, ideas, and topics for the development and management of GBI important for citizens of the city of Leipzig, Germany. The questions were part of an online survey accompanying the development of the local GBI planning strategy: Master Plan Green. The strategy is focusing on five guiding themes that are leading local and global debates about sustainable and resilient cities: biodiversity, climate adaptation, environmental justice, health, and sustainable mobility. We categorize citizens' ideas and suggestions, summarize frequent problems and conflicts, and link ideas and visions to the five guiding themes. As the last step, we discuss citizens' suggestions in order to minimize conflicts in GBI and to identify deficits in present local planning. Major problems and conflicts that were addressed by respondents relate to quality, usability, other users, activities, and safety and security of GBI. Numerous suggestions aimed to tackle these problems, for example, by designating separate use areas, adding naturalness, improving maintenance, and enhancing facilities. A range of ideas and suggestions were based on diverging expectations underpinning the challenge of matching heterogeneous demands of GBI users in an equitable fashion. Linking these suggestions to the five guiding themes reveals that most ideas are covered by one or several guiding themes and are considered in local planning strategies. However, findings also demonstrate that increasing the quantity of Leipzig's GBI is a central request from respondents. Sociocultural and economic aspects as well as conflicting demands among citizens should further be central to GBI planning to avoid injustice and achieve sustainability objectives. This analysis gives insights into opinions and visions of citizens regarding the development of the city's GBI network and thus substantiates major strategic and planning themes leading global and local urban strategies toward sustainable cities. Considering specific suggestions and GBI deficits that bother citizens on a local level, offers the opportunity to improve the social and ecological resilience of GBI.
C1 [Palliwoda, Julia; Priess, Joerg A.] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, Leipzig, Germany.
   [Haase, Annegret; Rink, Dieter] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Urban & Environm Sociol, Leipzig, Germany.
   [Suppee, Constantin] Off Green Space & Water, Leipzig, Germany.
C3 Helmholtz Association; Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research
   (UFZ); Helmholtz Association; Helmholtz Center for Environmental
   Research (UFZ)
RP Palliwoda, J (corresponding author), UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, Leipzig, Germany.
RI Priess, Joerg/G-1697-2012
OI Palliwoda, Julia/0000-0001-5247-875X
FU BiodivErsA [01LC1616A]
FX The study was part of the UrbanGaia project http://urbangaia.eu/, which
   was funded by BiodivErsA, project number 01LC1616A. We thank T. Wilke
   from the City of Leipzig, Office of Green Space and Water, for his input
   in the expert workshops and R. Guschel from Stadtlabor for providing the
   survey data and valuable comments. Thanks to L. Orth for supporting the
   data analysis and to L. Jakobs for language editing.
CR Akpinar A, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V16, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.01.011
   Ali L, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9010024
   Andersson E, 2019, BIOSCIENCE, V69, P566, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biz058
   [Anonymous], 2018, INT STADT LEIPZ 2030
   [Anonymous], 2013, Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities
   [Anonymous], 2009, BRACHFLACHEN STADTEN
   [Anonymous], 2016, Urban sprawl in Europe: Joint EEA-FOEN report
   [Anonymous], 2015, Urban sustainability issues - What is a resource-efficient city?
   Aronson MFJ, 2017, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V15, P189, DOI 10.1002/fee.1480
   Artmann M, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V96, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.001
   Artmann M, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9020198
   BMUB, 2007, LEIPZIG CHARTA NACHH
   Bolund P, 1999, ECOL ECON, V29, P293, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0
   Breuste Jurgen., 2013, Ekologia Bratislava, V32, P290, DOI [DOI 10.2478/EKO-2013-0026, 10.2478/eko-2013-0026]
   Buijs AE, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V22, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.002
   Burton E, 2000, URBAN STUD, V37, P1969, DOI 10.1080/00420980050162184
   Camps-Calvet M, 2015, PARTECIP CONFL, V8, P417, DOI 10.1285/i20356609v8i2p417
   Cerin E, 2017, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V14, DOI 10.1186/s12966-017-0471-5
   Chapman S, 2017, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V32, P1921, DOI 10.1007/s10980-017-0561-4
   Dallimer M, 2012, BIOSCIENCE, V62, P47, DOI 10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.9
   de Oliveira JAP, 2011, BIOL CONSERV, V144, P1302, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.007
   Dennis M, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V15, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.009
   EEA, 2012, CLIM CHANG IMP VULN, DOI DOI 10.2800/66071
   Elmqvist T, 2015, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V14, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001
   European Commission-Directorate-General for Regional Policy, 2011, CIT TOM CHALL VIS WA
   European Environment Agency, 2016, TRANSFORMING CITIES, DOI DOI 10.2800/41895
   European Environment Agency - EEA, 2014, SPAT AN GREEN INFR E, DOI DOI 10.2800/11170
   Faehnle M, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V130, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.012
   Fallmann J, 2013, ERDE, V144, P202
   Fors H, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9110670
   Fuller RA, 2007, BIOLOGY LETT, V3, P390, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149
   Gómez-Baggethun E, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019
   Guneralp Burak, 2013, P437
   Haaland C, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P760, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.009
   Haase D, 2017, HABITAT INT, V64, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.005
   Haase D, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P413, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0
   Haase D, 2008, NAT CULT, V3, P1, DOI 10.3167/nc.2008.030101
   Hansen R, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V96, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.042
   Hansen R, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P516, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0510-2
   Hegetschweiler KT, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V21, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.002
   Hunter MR, 2008, INSECT CONSERV DIVER, V1, P189, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2008.00024.x
   Ignatieva M, 2018, SCIENCE, V362, P148, DOI 10.1126/science.aau6974
   IQAir, 2021, 2020 world air quality report: Region & city pm2.5 ranking
   Jacobs S, 2016, ECOSYST SERV, V22, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.007
   Jorgensen A, 2010, NAT CULT, V5, P338, DOI 10.3167/nc.2010.050307
   Kabisch N, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V107, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.008
   Kabisch N, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V122, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.016
   Kaczynski AT, 2008, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V5, P619, DOI 10.1123/jpah.5.4.619
   Koskela H, 2000, GEOFORUM, V31, P269, DOI 10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00033-0
   Kowarik I, 2011, ENVIRON POLLUT, V159, P1974, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.02.022
   Kowarik Ingo., 2013, International Journal of Wilderness, V19, P32
   Larsen L, 2004, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V70, P374
   Lee ACK, 2011, J PUBLIC HEALTH-UK, V33, P212, DOI 10.1093/pubmed/fdq068
   Low S, 2013, ASHGATE RESEARCH COMPANION TO PLANNING AND CULTURE, P295
   Lyytimäki J, 2009, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V8, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.003
   Marselle MR, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-79924-5
   McCormack GR, 2010, HEALTH PLACE, V16, P712, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.003
   Mcdonald R., 2018, NATURE URBAN CENTURY
   Meyers R.A., 2020, ENCY SUSTAINABILITY, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_211-5
   Miller JR, 2005, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V20, P430, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.013
   Mohaupt F., 2018, GRUNFLACHENMANAGEMEN
   Mueller Norbert, 2013, P123
   Naturkapital Deutschland-TEEB DE, 2016, OK STADT GES SCHUTZ
   Nawrath M, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V190, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103598
   Niemelä J, 1999, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V8, P119, DOI 10.1023/A:1008817325994
   Okolowe, 2021, MEHR BAUM LEIPZ
   Özgüner H, 2011, LANDSCAPE RES, V36, P599, DOI 10.1080/01426397.2011.560474
   Palliwoda J, 2020, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V35, P1127, DOI 10.1007/s10980-020-01004-w
   Palliwoda J, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V157, P394, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.003
   Peters K, 2010, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V9, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.11.003
   R Core Team, 2020, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
   Rall EL, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.004
   Revi A, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P535
   Batalla CR, 2016, WORLD SUSTAIN SER, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26734-0_1
   Schipperijn J, 2010, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V9, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.002
   Southon GE, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V158, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.003
   Stadt Leipzig, 2019, STRASS LEIPZ 2030 DE
   Stadt Leipzig, 2020, MAST GRUN
   Stadt Leipzig, 2017, FREIR STADT LEIPZ DE
   Stadt Leipzig, 2019, ORTST 2018
   Stadt Leipzig, 2020, FACTS FIG 2020
   Stadt Leipzig, 2017, ENTW INT STADT LEIPZ
   Stadt Leipzig, 2020, NEUES FORD DACHB LEI
   Stadt Leipzig, 2019, FACHK FREIR UMW
   Stadt Leipzig, 2020, BET ZUM MAST GRUN
   StadtLabor Troger+Mothes GbR., 2019, ONLINE UMFRAGE STADT
   Tzoulas K, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
   Ugolini F, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126888
   United Nations, 2022, Sustainable development goals
   Van Herzele A, 2003, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V63, P109, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00192-5
   Veitch J, 2006, HEALTH PLACE, V12, P383, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.02.009
   Venter ZS, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abb396
   Vierikko K, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126501
   Wickham H., 2009, ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, DOI [10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3, 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4]
   Wolch JR, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
NR 95
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 9
U2 52
PU Resilience Alliance
PI Dedham
PA 231 Bussey St., Beckwith and Brown, Dedham, Massachusetts, UNITED STATES
SN 1708-3087
J9 ECOL SOC
JI Ecol. Soc.
PD JUN
PY 2022
VL 27
IS 2
AR 270208
DI 10.5751/ES-13129-270208
PG 26
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 3C3QF
UT WOS:000828540400002
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Champagne, E
   Turgeon, R
   Munson, AD
   Raymond, P
AF Champagne, Emilie
   Turgeon, Roxanne
   Munson, Alison D.
   Raymond, Patricia
TI Seedling Response to Simulated Browsing and Reduced Water Availability:
   Insights for Assisted Migration Plantations
SO FORESTS
LA English
DT Article
DE assisted translocation; Cervids; compensatory growth; greenhouse
   experiment; simulated browsing; tolerance; water stress
ID RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; THUJA-OCCIDENTALIS; BIOMASS ALLOCATION; PLANT
   TOLERANCE; DROUGHT STRESS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; NORWAY SPRUCE; HERBIVORY;
   GROWTH; RESISTANCE
AB To facilitate forest transition to future climate conditions, managers can use adaptive silvicultural tools, for example the assisted translocation of tree species and genotypes to areas with suitable future climate conditions (i.e., assisted migration). Like traditional plantations, however, assisted migration plantations are at risk of failure because of browsing by ungulate herbivores. The ability of seedlings to tolerate browsing could also be hampered by low water availability, as is expected under climate change. Using a greenhouse experiment with five eastern North American tree species, we evaluated the effects of simulated winter browsing and reduced water availability on the growth (total biomass, shoot:root ratio), survival, and chemical composition (nitrogen, total phenolics, flavonoids) of seedlings. We compared seedlings from three geographic provenances representing three climate analogues, i.e., locations with a current climate similar to the climate predicted at the plantation site at a specific time (here: current, mid-century and end of the century). We hypothesized that seedlings would allocate resources to the system (shoots or roots) affected by the most limiting treatment (simulated browsing or reduced water availability). Additionally, we evaluated whether the combination of treatments would have an additive or non-additive effect on the growth, survival and chemical composition of the seedlings. Quercus rubra seedlings reacted only to the water reduction treatment (changes in biomass and N concentration, dependent on geographic provenance) while Pinus strobus reacted only to the simulated browsing treatment (biomass and chemical composition). We also observed non-additive effects of reduced water availability and simulated browsing on Prunus serotina, Acer saccharum and Thuja occidentalis. In general, shoot:root ratio and investment in chemical defense did not vary in response to treatments. The regrowth response observed in Q. rubra and A. saccharum suggests that these species could tolerate periodic browsing events, even when water availability is reduced. More information is required to understand their long-term tolerance to repeated browsing events and to harsher and more frequent water stress. We highlight the importance of species-specific growth and allocation responses that vary with geographic provenance, which should be considered by managers when planning climate-adapted strategies, such as assisted migration.</p>
C1 [Champagne, Emilie; Turgeon, Roxanne] Univ Laval, Dept Biol, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada.
   [Champagne, Emilie; Raymond, Patricia] Minist Forets Faune & Parcs, Direct Rech Forestiere, Quebec City, PQ G1P 3W8, Canada.
   [Munson, Alison D.] Univ Laval, Fac Foresterie Geog & Geomat, Ctr Etud Foret CEF, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada.
C3 Laval University; Laval University
RP Champagne, E (corresponding author), Univ Laval, Dept Biol, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada.; Champagne, E (corresponding author), Minist Forets Faune & Parcs, Direct Rech Forestiere, Quebec City, PQ G1P 3W8, Canada.
EM emilie.champagne@mffp.gouv.qc.ca; roxanne.turgeon.1@ulaval.ca;
   Alison.Munson@sbf.ulaval.ca; patricia.raymond@mffp.gouv.qc.ca
RI Champagne, Emilie/I-4364-2019; Munson, Alison/B-1248-2013
OI Munson, Alison/0000-0001-6013-7998; Champagne,
   Emilie/0000-0003-1550-2735
FU NSERC; Ministeres des Forets, de la Faune et des Parcs [142332136]; Fond
   Vert [142959263]
FX This project was realized under a Mitacs Accelerate internship, and EC
   was supported by NSERC postdoctoral fellowship program during completion
   of the project. The project was also funded by the Ministeres des
   Forets, de la Faune et des Parcs (no. 142332136) and the Fond Vert (no.
   142959263).
CR ABRAMS MD, 1992, TREE PHYSIOL, V10, P343, DOI 10.1093/treephys/10.4.343
   Appel HM, 2001, J CHEM ECOL, V27, P761, DOI 10.1023/A:1010306103643
   Barton KE, 2020, BIOTROPICA, V52, P1217, DOI 10.1111/btp.12829
   Barton KE, 2010, AM NAT, V175, P481, DOI 10.1086/650722
   BELSKY AJ, 1986, AM NAT, V127, P870, DOI 10.1086/284531
   Benito-Garzón M, 2015, NEW FOREST, V46, P979, DOI 10.1007/s11056-015-9481-9
   BERGSTROM R, 1987, J ECOL, V75, P533, DOI 10.2307/2260432
   Bergstrom Roger, 2003, Journal for Nature Conservation (Jena), V10, P203, DOI 10.1078/1617-1381-00020
   Boisvert-Marsh L, 2020, FORESTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/f11090989
   Champagne E., 2021, DATASET SEEDLINGS RE
   Champagne E, 2021, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V498, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119576
   Champagne E, 2020, J CHEM ECOL, V46, P84, DOI 10.1007/s10886-019-01130-z
   Cornett MW, 2000, BIOL CONSERV, V93, P359, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00129-9
   Côté SD, 2004, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V35, P113, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105725
   Dey DC, 2014, FOREST SCI, V60, P926, DOI 10.5849/forsci.13-114
   EDENIUS L, 1993, ECOLOGY, V74, P2261, DOI 10.2307/1939579
   Eziz A, 2017, ECOL EVOL, V7, P11002, DOI 10.1002/ece3.3630
   Garrido E, 2016, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V29, P483, DOI 10.1111/jeb.12768
   Gedroc JJ, 1996, FUNCT ECOL, V10, P44, DOI 10.2307/2390260
   Godman R.M., 1990, SILVICS N AM VOLUME
   Gray LK, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V117, P289, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0548-8
   Grenier P, 2013, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V52, P733, DOI 10.1175/JAMC-D-12-0170.1
   Guillet C, 2006, OIKOS, V113, P33, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.13545.x
   Gutbrodt B, 2012, ARTHROPOD-PLANT INTE, V6, P171, DOI 10.1007/s11829-011-9173-0
   Hawkes CV, 2001, ECOLOGY, V82, P2045, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2045:TIOHOP]2.0.CO;2
   Hester A.J., 2006, LARGE HERBIVORE ECOL, P97, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511617461.00
   Housset JM, 2015, J BIOGEOGR, V42, P1233, DOI 10.1111/jbi.12508
   Jafarnia S, 2018, IFOREST, V11, P212, DOI 10.3832/ifor2496-010
   Jamieson MA, 2012, PLANT PHYSIOL, V160, P1719, DOI 10.1104/pp.112.206524
   Johnston W.F., 1990, Silvics of North America: Volume 1, Conifers
   Koricheva J, 1998, OIKOS, V83, P212, DOI 10.2307/3546833
   Kullberg Y, 2003, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V173, P125, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00017-8
   Kuznetsova A, 2017, J STAT SOFTW, V82, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Larouche C, 2010, NORTH J APPL FOR, V27, P5, DOI 10.1093/njaf/27.1.5
   Lenth RV, 2016, J STAT SOFTW, V69, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v069.i01
   Ma F, 2014, AOB PLANTS, V6, DOI 10.1093/aobpla/plu069
   Marquis D.A., 1990, Silvics of North America, Volume 2, Hardwoods, Agriculture Handbook 654, V2
   MATTSON WJ, 1980, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V11, P119, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001003
   McCarthy MC, 2007, FUNCT ECOL, V21, P713, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01276.x
   Michaelian M, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2084, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02357.x
   Millar CI, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P2145, DOI 10.1890/06-1715.1
   Millar CI, 2015, SCIENCE, V349, P823, DOI 10.1126/science.aaa9933
   Muehleisen AJ, 2020, ECOLOGY, V101, DOI 10.1002/ecy.3151
   Netherer S, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V205, P1128, DOI 10.1111/nph.13166
   O'Reilly-Wapstra JM, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V325, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.03.038
   Passioura JB, 2006, FUNCT PLANT BIOL, V33, P1075, DOI 10.1071/FP06223
   Pedlar JH, 2012, BIOSCIENCE, V62, P835, DOI 10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.10
   Pekal A, 2014, FOOD ANAL METHOD, V7, P1776, DOI 10.1007/s12161-014-9814-x
   Persson IL, 2007, OIKOS, V116, P1639, DOI [10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.15946.x, 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15946.x]
   Petersson LK, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V444, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.04.037
   Pike C, 2020, J FOREST, V118, P444, DOI 10.1093/jofore/fvaa013
   Potvin F., 1995, LINVENTAIRE BROUT RE, P70
   Puglielli G, 2021, NEW PHYTOL, V229, P308, DOI 10.1111/nph.16879
   P┬u┬ri┬u┬, 2014, EFFETS ANTICIPES CHA
   R Core Team, 2019, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
   Saucier J-P., 2009, Manuel de foresterie, V2nd
   SAUVESTY A, 1992, CAN J FOREST RES, V22, P654, DOI 10.1139/x92-087
   Schall P, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V266, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.017
   SORK VL, 1993, AM NAT, V142, P928, DOI 10.1086/285581
   Ste-Marie C, 2011, FOREST CHRON, V87, P724, DOI 10.5558/tfc2011-089
   Sun Y, 2010, WEED RES, V50, P527, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2010.00822.x
   Tardif J, 1997, CAN J FOREST RES, V27, P108, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-27-1-108
   Vitt P, 2010, BIOL CONSERV, V143, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.08.015
   Williamson B.T., 2009, CLIMATE CHANGE CANAD, P112
   Winder R, 2011, FOREST CHRON, V87, P731, DOI 10.5558/tfc2011-090
   Wise MJ, 2008, AM NAT, V172, P635, DOI 10.1086/591691
   Wise MJ, 2005, OIKOS, V109, P417, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13878.x
   Zhu K, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P1042, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02571.x
NR 68
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 2
U2 20
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 1999-4907
J9 FORESTS
JI Forests
PD OCT
PY 2021
VL 12
IS 10
AR 1396
DI 10.3390/f12101396
PG 23
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA WQ8GM
UT WOS:000714049100001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Tao, FL
   Palosuo, T
   Valkama, E
   Mäkipää, R
AF Tao, Fulu
   Palosuo, Taru
   Valkama, Elena
   Makipaa, Raisa
TI Cropland soils in China have a large potential for carbon sequestration
   based It on literature survey
SO SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Agronomic management; Carbon sequestration; Climate smart agriculture;
   GHG emission; Mitigation; Paris agreement
ID LONG-TERM FERTILIZATION; ORGANIC-CARBON; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CROPPING
   SYSTEM; STRAW RETURN; RICE PADDY; YIELD; MANAGEMENT; IMPACTS;
   AGRICULTURE
AB The carbon sequestration of soils has been of key concern particularly since the 4 per mille initiative was launched in COP21 in Paris. Here, we tried to understand three related important questions through literature survey: how did soil organic carbon (SOC) stock change in Chinese croplands in the past decades? What are the agronomic management practices and their potentials to increase the SOC of croplands in China? And how do changes in the SOC affect crop yields? The analyses showed that the SOC stock in the surface soil (0-20 cm) of Chinese croplands increased on average by 0.48% yr(-1) from 1980 to 2011. The increase was significant in the eastern and northern China, and particularly in the paddy soils in southern China; however it decreased in the northeastern China. The increase of the SOC stock was attributed to substantial increase in organic inputs, resulted from increased crop productivity, the amendments of crop residues and organic manure, the increases in synthetic fertilizer application and the optimal combination of nutrients, as well as adopting no-tillage practice. Increase in the SOC can increase crop yield and reduce yield variability. Additional means to enhance soil carbon sequestration can be application of biochar, and improvement of synthetic nitrogen use efficiency through disseminating formula fertilizer application based on soil testing, optimized application of inorganic and organic fertilizers associated with extension of conservation tillage. Currently, the straw return ratio has reached about 50%, whereas organic fertilization and conservation tillage (about 6.6%) are still at relatively low levels, the recommended management practices can be further extended to the regions with degraded soils and high population pressure. Further implementation of the recommended management practices on Chinese croplands would increase the SOC stock by >= 25.0 Tg C yr(-1) or 0.63% yr(-1), compensating for Chinese CO2 emissions by >= 1.0%. In conclusion, Chinese croplands can meet the 4 per mille target and play a crucial role in food security, carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation. The priority is to develop climate smart agronomic management practices to gain synergies between climate adaptation and mitigation.
C1 [Tao, Fulu; Palosuo, Taru; Valkama, Elena; Makipaa, Raisa] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Helsinki 00790, Finland.
C3 Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)
RP Tao, FL (corresponding author), Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Helsinki 00790, Finland.
EM fulu.tao@luke.fi
RI Valkama, Elena/ABB-4520-2021; Mäkipää, Raisa/AAC-6548-2022; Palosuo,
   Taru/B-9593-2012
OI Valkama, Elena/0000-0002-8337-8070; Makipaa, Raisa/0000-0003-3146-4425;
   Palosuo, Taru/0000-0003-4322-3450; Tao, F/0000-0001-8574-0080
FU Natural Resources Institute Finland; Academy of Finland through the
   project DivCSA [41007-00140700]
FX This study was funded by the strategic funding of Natural Resources
   Institute Finland (project ChinaSOC & ClimSmartAgr) and by the Academy
   of Finland through the project DivCSA (Project No. 41007-00140700).
CR [Anonymous], SIMULATION PREDICTIO
   [Anonymous], 1985, BLACK CARBON ENV
   [Anonymous], UNPUB
   [Anonymous], MODELLING CARBON BUD
   Bai W, 2016, TOXICOL ENVIRON CHEM, V98, P561, DOI 10.1080/02772248.2015.1133379
   Bellamy PH, 2005, NATURE, V437, P245, DOI 10.1038/nature04038
   Bi LD, 2009, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V129, P534, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.11.007
   Cai ZC, 2006, GEODERMA, V136, P708, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.05.008
   Ciais P, 2010, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V16, P1409, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02055.x
   Deng AX, 2017, CROP J, V5, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.cj.2016.06.015
   Du ZL, 2017, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V17, P581, DOI 10.1007/s11368-015-1349-2
   Du ZL, 2017, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V236, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2016.11.007
   Fang JY, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P4015, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1700304115
   Franzluebbers AJ, 2002, SOIL TILL RES, V66, P197, DOI 10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00027-2
   Guo JH, 2010, SCIENCE, V327, P1008, DOI 10.1126/science.1182570
   Han D, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P987, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13898
   Heikkinen J, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P1456, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12137
   Hijbeek R, 2017, PLANT SOIL, V411, P293, DOI 10.1007/s11104-016-3031-x
   Hong Y, 2017, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V244, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2017.04.019
   Huang S, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V112, P847, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0255-x
   Huang Y, 2006, CHINESE SCI BULL, V51, P1785, DOI 10.1007/s11434-006-2056-6
   Jiang C., 2013, T CHIN SOC AGR ENG, V29, P185
   Knoblauch C, 2011, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V43, P1768, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.07.012
   Kuhn NJ, 2016, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V216, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2015.10.001
   Lal R, 2006, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V17, P197, DOI 10.1002/ldr.696
   Lal R, 2004, SCIENCE, V304, P1623, DOI 10.1126/science.1097396
   Lal R, 2004, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V65, P263, DOI 10.1023/B:CLIM.0000038203.81854.7c
   Lal R, 2002, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V13, P469, DOI 10.1002/ldr.531
   Lal R, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P3285, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14054
   Li CS, 2003, ECOL APPL, V13, P327, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0327:MSOCCI]2.0.CO;2
   Li FY, 2013, SOIL SCI PLANT NUTR, V59, P800, DOI 10.1080/00380768.2013.821391
   Liao QL, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P861, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01792.x
   Liu CA, 2017, SOIL TILL RES, V172, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2017.05.003
   Liu CY, 2011, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V140, P226, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.009
   Liu EK, 2010, GEODERMA, V158, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.029
   Liu XJ, 2013, NATURE, V494, P459, DOI 10.1038/nature11917
   Liu Z, 2015, NATURE, V524, P335, DOI 10.1038/nature14677
   Lu F, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P281, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01743.x
   Lu F, 2015, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V20, P1545, DOI 10.1007/s11027-014-9564-5
   Marland G., 2006, TRENDS COMPENDIUM DA
   Nair PKR, 2009, J PLANT NUTR SOIL SC, V172, P10, DOI 10.1002/jpln.200800030
   Ogle SM, 2003, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V9, P1521, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00683.x
   Ogle SM, 2010, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V16, P810, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01951.x
   Pan GX, 2010, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V136, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2009.12.011
   Pan GX, 2009, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V131, P274, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2009.01.020
   Pan GX, 2009, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V129, P344, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.008
   [潘根兴 PAN GenXing], 2006, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V26, P3704
   Paustian K, 2016, NATURE, V532, P49, DOI 10.1038/nature17174
   Pittelkow CM, 2015, NATURE, V517, P365, DOI 10.1038/nature13809
   Poeplau C, 2015, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V200, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.024
   Poulton P, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P2563, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14066
   Powlson DS, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P678, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2292
   Qin XB, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V569, P1390, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.222
   Qiu SJ, 2016, SOIL TILL RES, V163, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2016.07.002
   Rui WY, 2010, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V135, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2009.09.010
   Schlesinger W.H., 1997, Biogeochemistry: An analysis of global change
   Smith J, 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V11, P2141, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001075.x
   Smith P, 2008, PHILOS T R SOC B, V363, P789, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2007.2184
   Smith P, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P1315, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13178
   Song XZ, 2014, SCI REP-UK, V4, DOI 10.1038/srep04460
   Stockmann U, 2013, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V164, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2012.10.001
   Sun WJ, 2010, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V24, DOI 10.1029/2009GB003484
   Syswerda SP, 2011, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V75, P92, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2009.0414
   Tang HJ, 2006, GEODERMA, V134, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.10.005
   Tang XL, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P4021, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1700291115
   Tao FL, 2012, CLIM RES, V54, P233, DOI 10.3354/cr01131
   Tian HQ, 2011, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V25, DOI 10.1029/2010GB003838
   Tian K, 2015, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V204, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2015.02.008
   Tian SZ, 2016, SOIL TILL RES, V163, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2016.06.005
   Tubiello FN, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P2655, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12865
   Wan YF, 2011, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V141, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2011.02.004
   Wang SK, 2016, J ARID LAND, V8, P569, DOI 10.1007/s40333-016-0011-1
   Wei WL, 2016, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V225, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2016.04.004
   West TO, 2008, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V72, P285, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2007.0113
   Wollenberg E, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P3859, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13340
   Wu JS, 2014, SOIL RES, V52, P575, DOI 10.1071/SR14021
   Xiao DP, 2014, EUR J AGRON, V52, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2013.09.020
   Xie YingXin Xie YingXin, 2015, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, V31, P167
   Xie ZB, 2007, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V13, P1989, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01409.x
   Xu SX, 2012, CATENA, V92, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2011.12.005
   Xu SX, 2011, GEODERMA, V166, P206, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.08.002
   Yan XY, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P1487, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02286.x
   Yang XM, 2008, SOIL TILL RES, V100, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2008.05.003
   Yao ZY, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V607, P433, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.028
   Yu YY, 2009, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V23, DOI 10.1029/2008GB003428
   Zhang AF, 2012, PLANT SOIL, V351, P263, DOI 10.1007/s11104-011-0957-x
   Zhang AF, 2012, FIELD CROP RES, V127, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.020
   Zhang F, 2015, ECOL MODEL, V312, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.05.006
   Zhang W, 2014, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V48, P2589, DOI 10.1021/es404352h
   Zhang XB, 2016, GEODERMA, V265, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.11.027
   Zhao HL, 2018, SOIL TILL RES, V175, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2017.09.012
   Zhao X, 2017, EUR J AGRON, V84, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2016.11.009
   Zhao YN, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8090879
   Zhao Y, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P1801, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1721160115
   Zheng CY, 2014, CROP J, V2, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.cj.2014.06.006
   Zheng JF, 2011, CHINESE SCI BULL, V56, P3748, DOI 10.1007/s11434-011-4693-7
   Zhu LQ, 2015, ECOL INDIC, V53, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.038
   Zou JW, 2005, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V19, DOI 10.1029/2004GB002401
NR 98
TC 71
Z9 82
U1 20
U2 317
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0167-1987
EI 1879-3444
J9 SOIL TILL RES
JI Soil Tillage Res.
PD MAR
PY 2019
VL 186
BP 70
EP 78
DI 10.1016/j.still.2018.10.009
PG 9
WC Soil Science
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA HE0CN
UT WOS:000452934500008
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Ramos, B
   González-Acuña, D
   Loyola, DE
   Johnson, WE
   Parker, PG
   Massaro, M
   Dantas, GPM
   Miranda, MD
   Vianna, JA
AF Ramos, Barbara
   Gonzalez-Acuna, Daniel
   Loyola, David E.
   Johnson, Warren E.
   Parker, Patricia G.
   Massaro, Melanie
   Dantas, Gisele P. M.
   Miranda, Marcelo D.
   Vianna, Juliana A.
TI Landscape genomics: natural selection drives the evolution of mitogenome
   in penguins
SO BMC GENOMICS
LA English
DT Article
DE Comparative mitogenomics; Selection; Penguins; Adaptation
ID HIGH-ALTITUDE ADAPTATION; MITOCHONDRIAL GENOMES; EL-NINO; POSITIVE
   SELECTION; HUMBOLDT PENGUIN; INFECTIOUS-DISEASES; LARGE PHYLOGENIES;
   CLIMATE-CHANGE; DNA; SEQUENCE
AB Background: Mitochondria play a key role in the balance of energy and heat production, and therefore the mitochondrial genome is under natural selection by environmental temperature and food availability, since starvation can generate more efficient coupling of energy production. However, selection over mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) genes has usually been evaluated at the population level. We sequenced by NGS 12 mitogenomes and with four published genomes, assessed genetic variation in ten penguin species distributed from the equator to Antarctica. Signatures of selection of 13 mitochondrial protein-coding genes were evaluated by comparing among species within and among genera (Spheniscus, Pygoscelis, Eudyptula, Eudyptes and Aptenodytes). The genetic data were correlated with environmental data obtained through remote sensing (sea surface temperature [SST], chlorophyll levels [Chl] and a combination of SST and Chl [COM]) through the distribution of these species.
   Results: We identified the complete mtDNA genomes of several penguin species, including ND6 and 8 tRNAs on the light strand and 12 protein coding genes, 14 tRNAs and two rRNAs positioned on the heavy strand. The highest diversity was found in NADH dehydrogenase genes and the lowest in COX genes. The lowest evolutionary divergence among species was between Humboldt (Spheniscus humboldti) and Galapagos (S. mendiculus) penguins (0.004), while the highest was observed between little penguin (Eudyptula minor) and Adelie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae) (0.097). We identified a signature of purifying selection (Ka/Ks < 1) across the mitochondrial genome, which is consistent with the hypothesis that purifying selection is constraining mitogenome evolution to maintain Oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) proteins and functionality. Pairwise species maximum-likelihood analyses of selection at codon sites suggest positive selection has occurred on ATP8 (Fixed-Effects Likelihood, FEL) and ND4 (Single Likelihood Ancestral Counting, SLAC) in all penguins. In contrast, COX1 had a signature of strong negative selection. ND4 Ka/Ks ratios were highly correlated with SST (Mantel, p-value: 0.0001; GLM, p-value: 0.00001) and thus may be related to climate adaptation throughout penguin speciation.
   Conclusions: These results identify mtDNA candidate genes under selection which could be involved in broad-scale adaptations of penguins to their environment. Such knowledge may be particularly useful for developing predictive models of how these species may respond to severe climatic changes in the future.
C1 [Ramos, Barbara; Miranda, Marcelo D.; Vianna, Juliana A.] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Fac Agron & Ingn Forestal, Dept Ecosistemas & Medio Ambiente, Av Vicuna Mackenna, Santiago 4860, Chile.
   [Ramos, Barbara] Univ Andres Bello, Fac Ecol & Recursos Nat, Republ 252, Santiago, Chile.
   [Gonzalez-Acuna, Daniel] Univ Concepcion, Fac Ciencias Vet, Dept Ciencias Pecuarias, Av Vicente Mendez 595, Chillan 3780000, CP, Chile.
   [Loyola, David E.] Ctr Nacl Genom & Bioinformat, Portugal 49, Santiago, Chile.
   [Loyola, David E.] I DEA Biotech, Av Cent 3413, Santiago, Chile.
   [Johnson, Warren E.] Natl Zool Pk, Smithsonian Conservat Biol Inst, 1500 Remount Rd, Front Royal, VA 22630 USA.
   [Parker, Patricia G.] Univ Missouri St Louis, One Univ Blvd, St Louis, MO 63121 USA.
   [Parker, Patricia G.] St Louis Zoo, One Univ Blvd, St Louis, MO 63121 USA.
   [Massaro, Melanie] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Environm Sci, POB 789, Albury, NSW, Australia.
   [Massaro, Melanie] Charles Sturt Univ, Inst Land Water & Soc, POB 789, Albury, NSW, Australia.
   [Dantas, Gisele P. M.] Pontificia Univ Catolica Minas Gerais, Av Dom Jose Gaspar 500, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
   [Vianna, Juliana A.] Ctr Cambio Global UC, Santiago, Chile.
C3 Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile; Universidad Andres Bello;
   Universidad de Concepcion; Smithsonian Institution; Smithsonian National
   Zoological Park & Conservation Biology Institute; University of Missouri
   System; University of Missouri Saint Louis; Charles Sturt University;
   Charles Sturt University; Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Minas
   Gerais
RP Vianna, JA (corresponding author), Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Fac Agron & Ingn Forestal, Dept Ecosistemas & Medio Ambiente, Av Vicuna Mackenna, Santiago 4860, Chile.; Vianna, JA (corresponding author), Ctr Cambio Global UC, Santiago, Chile.
EM jvianna@uc.cl
RI Chaves Ramos, Barbara/KHE-4980-2024; Dantas, Gisele/T-6782-2019;
   Massaro, Melanie/P-4791-2017; Miranda, Marcelo/N-6462-2014; Vianna,
   Juliana/E-9847-2015; Johnson, Warren/D-4149-2016; Dantas,
   Gisele/B-6822-2014
OI Massaro, Melanie/0000-0001-9039-1268; Miranda,
   Marcelo/0000-0002-8386-4888; Vianna, Juliana/0000-0003-2330-7825;
   Johnson, Warren/0000-0002-5954-186X; Dantas, Gisele/0000-0001-5282-7577
FU Sea World and Busch Garden Conservation Fund; Fondecyt [11110060,
   1150517]; INACH [G06-11, T12-13, 12-14]; UNAB [DI-410-13/I]; CNPq
   [482501/2013-8, 490403/2008-5]; FAPESP [2009/08624]; National Science
   Foundation [ANT 0944411]; New Zealand's Ministry of Science and
   Innovation grant [C01X1001]; Saint Louis Zoo and the Des Lee
   Collaborative Vision
FX The research was funded by the Sea World and Busch Garden Conservation
   Fund, Fondecyt No 11110060, 1150517 INACH No G06-11, T12-13 and 12-14,
   UNAB DI-410-13/I, and CNPq 482501/2013-8 and 490403/2008-5, FAPESP
   2009/08624. Sampling of Adelie penguins at Cape Crozier was supported
   through funding from the National Science Foundation to David G. Ainley
   (ANT 0944411) and logistics supplied by the U.S. Antarctic Program. MM
   was funded by a New Zealand's Ministry of Science and Innovation grant
   (C01X1001). PP was funded by the Saint Louis Zoo and the Des Lee
   Collaborative Vision.
CR Ainley D, 2010, ECOL MONOGR, V80, P49, DOI 10.1890/08-2289.1
   Ainley DG, 2002, ADELIE PENGUIN BELLW, DOI DOI 10.7312/AINL12306
   Aljanabi SM, 1997, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V25, P4692, DOI 10.1093/nar/25.22.4692
   [Anonymous], SEAWIFS REPROCESSING
   [Anonymous], 2000, EOS Data Products Handbook
   [Anonymous], 1995, The penguins: Spheniscidae
   [Anonymous], OCEANCOLOR
   [Anonymous], GIGASCIENCE
   [Anonymous], 2009, FigTree 1.3.1
   Arnoult D, 2009, SEMIN IMMUNOL, V21, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.smim.2009.05.009
   Baker AJ, 2006, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V273, P11, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2005.3260
   Ballard JWO, 2010, MOL ECOL, V19, P1523, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04594.x
   Ballard JWO, 2004, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V271, P1197, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2004.2709
   Balloux F, 2009, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V276, P3447, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2009.0752
   Barriga GP, 2016, EMERG INFECT DIS, V22, P2221, DOI 10.3201/eid2212.161076
   Bazin E, 2006, SCIENCE, V312, P570, DOI 10.1126/science.1122033
   Boersma PD, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0085602
   Boersma PD, 1998, CONDOR, V100, P245, DOI 10.2307/1370265
   Boore JL, 1999, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V27, P1767, DOI 10.1093/nar/27.8.1767
   Brandt U, 2006, ANNU REV BIOCHEM, V75, P69, DOI 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142539
   Burger G, 1996, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V93, P2328, DOI 10.1073/pnas.93.6.2328
   Cheviron ZA, 2009, EVOLUTION, V63, P1593, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00644.x
   Cimino MA, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P136, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12016
   Clarke JA, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P11545, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0611099104
   Cobb KM, 2003, NATURE, V424, P271, DOI 10.1038/nature01779
   da Fonseca RR, 2008, BMC GENOMICS, V9, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-9-119
   Diniz JAF, 2013, GENET MOL BIOL, V36, P475, DOI 10.1590/S1415-47572013000400002
   Dobson A, 2001, PHILOS T R SOC B, V356, P1001, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2001.0900
   Excoffier L, 2010, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V10, P564, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x
   Foote AD, 2011, BIOL LETTERS, V7, P116, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0638
   Forcada J, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P411, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01108.x
   Forcada J, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P1618, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01909.x
   Friedlaender AS, 2011, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V58, P1729, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.11.018
   Borboroglu PG, 2013, PENGUINS: NATURAL HISTORY AND CONSERVATION, P321
   Garvin Michael R., 2015, Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, V53, P1
   Gershoni M, 2009, BIOESSAYS, V31, P642, DOI 10.1002/bies.200800139
   Gibson A, 2005, MOL BIOL EVOL, V22, P251, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msi012
   Grimaldi WW, 2015, POLAR BIOL, V38, P591, DOI 10.1007/s00300-014-1632-5
   Guindon S, 2003, SYST BIOL, V52, P696, DOI 10.1080/10635150390235520
   Hancock AM, 2011, MOL BIOL EVOL, V28, P601, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msq228
   Harrisson K, 2016, HEREDITY, V116, P506, DOI 10.1038/hdy.2016.8
   HAYS C, 1986, BIOL CONSERV, V36, P169, DOI 10.1016/0006-3207(86)90005-4
   Huelsenbeck JP, 2001, BIOINFORMATICS, V17, P754, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
   Hurt AC, 2016, J VIROL, V90, P9674, DOI 10.1128/JVI.01404-16
   Hurt AC, 2014, MBIO, V5, DOI 10.1128/mBio.01098-14
   Kadenbach B, 2003, BBA-BIOENERGETICS, V1604, P77, DOI 10.1016/S0005-2728(03)00027-6
   Katewa SD, 2007, INSECT BIOCHEM MOLEC, V37, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.ibmb.2006.11.002
   Kerr KCR, 2011, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V11, P1045, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03049.x
   Kogut MH, 2009, J APPL POULTRY RES, V18, P103, DOI 10.3382/japr.2008-00080
   Ksepka DT, 2006, CLADISTICS, V22, P412, DOI 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00116.x
   Labuschagne C, 2014, GENE, V534, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.gene.2013.09.057
   Latif M, 1997, J CLIMATE, V10, P2221, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<2221:GWDVOE>2.0.CO;2
   Li H, 2009, BIOINFORMATICS, V25, P1754, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
   Li YL, 2013, GENE, V517, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.gene.2012.12.096
   Librado P, 2009, BIOINFORMATICS, V25, P1451, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187
   Lynch HJ, 2012, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V454, P135, DOI 10.3354/meps09252
   Marshall HD, 2013, GENE, V517, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.gene.2012.12.093
   McClintock J, 2008, AM SCI, V96, P302
   Meiklejohn CD, 2007, TRENDS GENET, V23, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2007.03.008
   Menezes AN, 2013, MITOCHONDRION, V13, P846, DOI 10.1016/j.mito.2013.06.001
   Mindell DP, 1998, MOL BIOL EVOL, V15, P1568, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025884
   Mishmar D, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P171, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0136972100
   Morales HE, 2015, MOL ECOL, V24, P2820, DOI 10.1111/mec.13203
   Nunes VL, 2011, MOL ECOL, V20, P193, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04936.x
   Ohta A, 2011, MITOCHONDRION, V11, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.mito.2010.08.006
   Paredes R, 2003, WATERBIRDS, V26, P129, DOI 10.1675/1524-4695(2003)026[0129:SOTHPI]2.0.CO;2
   Pereira SL, 2000, GENET MOL BIOL, V23, P745, DOI 10.1590/S1415-47572000000400008
   Pond SLK, 2011, MOL BIOL EVOL, V28, P3033, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msr125
   Pond SLK, 2005, MOL BIOL EVOL, V22, P1208, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msi105
   Pond SLK, 2005, BIOINFORMATICS, V21, P676, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti079
   Pörtner HO, 2004, PHYSIOL BIOCHEM ZOOL, V77, P959, DOI 10.1086/423742
   QGIS Development Team, 2022, QGIS Geographic Information System
   Raats M. M., 1992, Food Quality and Preference, V3, P89, DOI 10.1016/0950-3293(91)90028-D
   Ribeiro AM, 2011, EVOLUTION, V65, P3499, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01397.x
   Rion S, 2007, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V20, P1655, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01405.x
   Ritchie PA, 2004, MOL BIOL EVOL, V21, P240, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msh012
   Ronquist F, 2003, BIOINFORMATICS, V19, P1572, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
   Ruiz-Pesini E, 2004, SCIENCE, V303, P223, DOI 10.1126/science.1088434
   Sazanov LA, 2000, J MOL BIOL, V302, P455, DOI 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4079
   Shen YY, 2009, GENOME RES, V19, P1760, DOI 10.1101/gr.093138.109
   Siegel DA, 2013, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V135, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2013.03.025
   Simeone A, 2002, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V227, P43, DOI 10.3354/meps227043
   Slack KE, 2003, GENE, V302, P43, DOI 10.1016/S0378111902010533
   Slack KE, 2006, MOL BIOL EVOL, V23, P1144, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msj124
   Storfer A, 2007, HEREDITY, V98, P128, DOI 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800917
   Subramanian S, 2014, MITOCHONDR DNA, V25, P271, DOI 10.3109/19401736.2013.800503
   Subramanian S, 2013, BIOL LETTERS, V9, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0748
   Subramanian S, 2009, TRENDS GENET, V25, P482, DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2009.09.005
   Suzuki Y, 2004, MOL BIOL EVOL, V21, P914, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msh098
   Tamura K, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P11030, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0404206101
   Tamura K, 2013, MOL BIOL EVOL, V30, P2725, DOI [10.1093/molbev/mst197, 10.1093/molbev/msr121]
   Teacher AGF, 2012, BMC EVOL BIOL, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-12-248
   Thiel M, 2007, OCEANOGR MAR BIOL, V45, P195
   Thompson JD, 1997, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V25, P4876, DOI 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876
   Tomasco IH, 2011, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V61, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.06.014
   Trathan PN, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0014738
   Vargas FH, 2006, BIOL CONSERV, V127, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.08.001
   Vianna Juliana A., 2014, Marine Ornithology, V42, P153
   Wallace DC, 2005, ANNU REV GENET, V39, P359, DOI 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.110304.095751
   Watanabe M, 2006, GENE, V378, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gene.2006.05.003
   Welch AJ, 2014, GENOME BIOL EVOL, V6, P433, DOI 10.1093/gbe/evu025
   West AP, 2011, NAT REV IMMUNOL, V11, P389, DOI 10.1038/nri2975
   Williams GN, 2013, CONT SHELF RES, V52, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.csr.2012.08.014
   Xu Shuqing, 2007, Journal of Genetics and Genomics, V34, P720, DOI 10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60081-2
   Yu L, 2011, MITOCHONDRION, V11, P497, DOI 10.1016/j.mito.2011.01.004
   Zerbino DR, 2008, GENOME RES, V18, P821, DOI 10.1101/gr.074492.107
   Zhang JZ, 2015, NAT REV GENET, V16, P409, DOI 10.1038/nrg3950
   Zhou RB, 2011, NATURE, V469, P221, DOI 10.1038/nature09663
   Zhuang X, 2010, MOL BIOL EVOL, V27, P1391, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msq026
   Zink RM, 2005, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V272, P71, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2004.2908
NR 110
TC 26
Z9 28
U1 3
U2 79
PU BMC
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND
SN 1471-2164
J9 BMC GENOMICS
JI BMC Genomics
PD JAN 16
PY 2018
VL 19
AR 53
DI 10.1186/s12864-017-4424-9
PG 17
WC Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Genetics & Heredity
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Genetics & Heredity
GA FT1GP
UT WOS:000422883800003
PM 29338715
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Rieger, M
   Lo Bianco, R
   Okie, WR
AF Rieger, M
   Lo Bianco, R
   Okie, WR
TI Response of <i>Prunus ferganensis</i>, <i>Prunus persica</i> and two
   interspecific hybrids to moderate drought stress
SO TREE PHYSIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE gas exchange; leaf venation; peach; photosynthesis; sorbitol; water
   potential
ID OSMOTIC ADJUSTMENT; ABSCISIC-ACID; GAS-EXCHANGE; WATER-STRESS; LEAVES;
   MANNITOL; SORBITOL; TREES; METABOLISM; RESISTANCE
AB Prunus ferganensis (Kost. & Riab) Kov. & Kost, a close relative of cultivated peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.), is native to and regions of central Asia. A distinguishing feature of P. ferganensis is its prominent, elongated, unbranched pattern of leaf venation. To determine whether the long-vein trait could be used as a marker in breeding for drought tolerance, we investigated the association between this trait and the leaf morphological and physiological parameters related to drought response in P. ferganensis, P. persica and two interspecific hybrids, one with the long-vein trait (BY94P7585) and one without (BY94P7589). The four genotypes were grafted onto "Guardian" peach rootstock and half of the plants were assigned to a drought treatment in which irrigation was limited to 25-50% of the evapotranspiration (ET) rate measured in the remaining well-watered plants, which were irrigated to runoff daily. The drought treatment reduced photosynthesis and leaf conductance by 49-83% and reduced total leaf area per plant by 17-24%, but generally did not affect mid-morning leaf water potential. Leaf gas exchange did not differ among genotypes in either treatment. Sorbitol accumulated in mature leaves in response to drought, but neither its amount nor its metabolism varied systematically with climatic adaptation among genotypes. Accumulation of transport sugars was highest in P. ferganensis, indicating that growth reduction may represent an important strategy for coping with drought in this species. Prunus ferganensis and the hybrids had higher ET than P. persica, and seemed to use water opportunistically, maintaining high gas exchange rates and consequently high ET when water was available, and avoiding low water potentials through stomatal closure as soil water declined. Leaf size (cm(2) leaf(-1)) and specific leaf area (cm(2) g(-1) dry mass) were lower in P. ferganensis and the hybrids than in P. persica. We conclude that the long-vein trait is not a reliable marker for drought tolerance, but leaf traits of P. ferganensis such as size and specific leaf area may be useful in P. persica breeding programs targeting drought tolerance.
C1 Univ Georgia, Dept Hort, Athens, GA 30602 USA.
   USDA ARS, SE Fruit & Tree Nut Res Lab, Byron, GA 31008 USA.
C3 University System of Georgia; University of Georgia; United States
   Department of Agriculture (USDA)
RP Rieger, M (corresponding author), Univ Georgia, Dept Hort, Athens, GA 30602 USA.
RI ; Lo Bianco, Riccardo/M-3724-2015
OI Rieger, Mark/0009-0003-5558-1201; Lo Bianco,
   Riccardo/0000-0003-2568-2880
CR ABRAMS MD, 1994, TREE PHYSIOL, V14, P833, DOI 10.1093/treephys/14.7-8-9.833
   ABRAMS MD, 1992, TREE PHYSIOL, V10, P343, DOI 10.1093/treephys/10.4.343
   [Anonymous], 1977, Plant Response to Wind
   Bieleski R.L., 1982, Encycl. Plant Physiol, V13A, P158
   BROWN CL, 1980, TREES STRUCTURE FUNC
   Correia MJ, 1997, J EXP BOT, V48, P1727, DOI 10.1093/jexbot/48.314.1727
   DONSELMAN HM, 1982, ECOLOGY, V63, P962, DOI 10.2307/1937236
   FUBEDER A, 1992, NEW PHYTOL, V122, P45
   Guicherd P, 1997, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V11, P155, DOI 10.1007/s004680050071
   KARAKAS B, 2001, THESIS U GEORGIA ATH
   Komarov VL, 1941, FLORA USSR, V10
   KORZUN I, 1977, ATLAS WORLD WATER BA
   Lo Bianco R, 2000, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V108, P71, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.108001071.x
   LOPEZ M, 1995, EUR J AGRON, V4, P119, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(14)80023-3
   Moing A, 1997, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V122, P83, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.122.1.83
   NI BR, 1991, TREE PHYSIOL, V8, P1
   Peltier JP, 1997, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V12, P27, DOI 10.1007/s004680050118
   Pustovoitova TN, 1996, RUSS J PLANT PHYSL+, V43, P232
   RANNEY TG, 1991, HORTSCIENCE, V26, P1204, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.26.9.1204
   RANNEY TG, 1991, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V116, P684, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.116.4.684
   RIEGER M, 1992, TREE PHYSIOL, V11, P369, DOI 10.1093/treephys/11.4.369
   ROTH A, 1995, BOT ACTA, V108, P121, DOI 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1995.tb00841.x
   Roth-Nebelsick A, 2001, ANN BOT-LONDON, V87, P553, DOI 10.1006/anbo.2001.1391
   SAKAI A, 1961, NATURE, V189, P416, DOI 10.1038/189416a0
   Scorza R., 1991, Acta Hort, V290, P177, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.1991.290
   STOOP JMH, 1994, PLANT PHYSIOL, V106, P503, DOI 10.1104/pp.106.2.503
   Turner NC., 1980, Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress, P33
   WANG ZC, 1992, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V117, P816, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.117.5.816
   WILLIAMS MW, 1974, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V30, P49, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1974.tb04990.x
   WITKOWSKI ETF, 1991, OECOLOGIA, V88, P486, DOI 10.1007/BF00317710
   ZHANG JH, 1987, J EXP BOT, V38, P1174, DOI 10.1093/jxb/38.7.1174
   Zhang JW, 1997, TREE PHYSIOL, V17, P461
NR 32
TC 35
Z9 41
U1 2
U2 11
PU HERON PUBLISHING
PI VICTORIA
PA 202, 3994 SHELBOURNE ST, VICTORIA, BC V8N 3E2, CANADA
SN 0829-318X
J9 TREE PHYSIOL
JI Tree Physiol.
PD JAN
PY 2003
VL 23
IS 1
BP 51
EP 58
DI 10.1093/treephys/23.1.51
PG 8
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA 651RF
UT WOS:000181334000006
PM 12511304
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Hardy, H
   Harte, SJ
   Hopkins, RJ
   Mnyone, L
   Hawkes, FM
AF Hardy, Harrison
   Harte, Steven J.
   Hopkins, Richard J.
   Mnyone, Ladslaus
   Hawkes, Frances M.
TI The influence of manure-based organic fertilisers on the oviposition
   behaviour of Anopheles arabiensis
SO ACTA TROPICA
LA English
DT Article
DE Organic fertilisers; Oviposition; Anopheles arabiensis; Rice
   cultivation; Malaria vectors
ID RICE INTENSIFICATION SRI; MALARIA MOSQUITO; DIPTERA-CULICIDAE;
   AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES; CHEMICAL ECOLOGY; AQUATIC INSECTS; LACTIC-ACID;
   CULEX; GAMBIAE; AMMONIA
AB The rice agroecosystem provides suitable breeding habitat for many malaria vector species, and rice-adjacent communities are consequently exposed to a greater malaria transmission risk than non-rice-associated com-munities. As part of efforts to expand rice production in Africa, sustainable and climate-adapted practices such as the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) are being promoted. SRI encourages the use of organic fertilisers (OFs) such as cow and chicken dung, as opposed to inorganic industrially produced fertilisers, due to their lower resource cost, apparent benefit to the rice agroecosystem and as a means to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the production of industrial fertilisers. However, the impact of OFs on mosquito fauna is not well documented and may have knock-on consequences on malaria transmission risk. Here, we demonstrate, using dual choice egg count assays, that both cow and chicken dung modulate the oviposition behaviour of Anopheles arabiensis, a major malaria vector in Sub-Saharan Africa. A significantly reduced proportion of eggs were laid in water treated with either cow or chicken dung compared to untreated water, with higher dung concentrations resulting in further reduced proportions. When presented in competition, significantly fewer eggs were laid in water treated with chicken dung than with cow dung. Moreover, there was no evidence of egg retention in any experiment, including in no-choice experiments where only dung-containing dishes were available. These results suggest both cow and chicken dung may act as oviposition deterrents to malaria vector species and that the application of manure-based OFs in rice agriculture may modulate the oviposition behaviour of An. gambiae s.l. within agroecosystems. Quantification of the ammonia present in dung-infused water showed higher concen-trations were present in the chicken dung infusion, which may be one contributing factor to the difference in observed deterrence between the two dung types. Deterrence of mosquito oviposition in OF-treated farms may potentially affect the overall production of malaria vectors within rice fields and their contribution to local malaria transmission.
C1 [Hardy, Harrison; Harte, Steven J.; Hopkins, Richard J.; Hawkes, Frances M.] Univ Greenwich, Nat Resources Inst, London, England.
   [Mnyone, Ladslaus] Sokoine Univ Agr, Inst Pest Management, Morogoro, Tanzania.
   [Mnyone, Ladslaus] Minist Educ Sci & Technol, Dept Sci Technol & Innovat, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
C3 University of Greenwich; Sokoine University of Agriculture
RP Hawkes, FM (corresponding author), Univ Greenwich, Nat Resources Inst, London, England.
EM f.m.hawkes@gre.ac.uk
RI Hopkins, Richard/HLW-9682-2023; Harte, Steven/AAW-5652-2021
OI Hopkins, Richard/0000-0003-4935-5825; Hawkes,
   Frances/0000-0002-0964-3702; Harte, Steven/0000-0001-9628-7912; Hardy,
   Harrison/0000-0003-1209-1256
FU UK Research and Innovation's Expanding Excellence in England Fund under
   the Food and Nutrition Security Initiative (FaNSI), Climate Change area
   [Greenwich] [50.18]
FX This work was supported by UK Research and Innovation's Expanding
   Excellence in England Fund under the Food and Nutrition Security
   Initiative (FaNSI), Climate Change area [50.18 Greenwich].
CR Akpodiete NO, 2021, PARASITE VECTOR, V14, DOI 10.1186/s13071-020-04483-7
   Albeny-Simoes D, 2014, OECOLOGIA, V175, P481, DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-2910-1
   Allan SA, 2005, J AM MOSQUITO CONTR, V21, P268, DOI 10.2987/8756-971X(2005)21[268:EOOSAO]2.0.CO;2
   Asmare Y, 2017, MALARIA J, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12936-017-1717-z
   Benelli G, 2014, PARASITOL RES, V113, P933, DOI 10.1007/s00436-013-3725-4
   BENTLEY MD, 1989, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V34, P401, DOI 10.1146/annurev.en.34.010189.002153
   Blaustein L, 2005, J VECTOR ECOL, V30, P299
   Braks MAH, 2001, PHYSIOL ENTOMOL, V26, P142, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3032.2001.00227.x
   Buxton M, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V715, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136952
   Chaccour C, 2016, MALARIA J, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12936-015-1063-y
   Chan K, 2022, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V6, pE257, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00349-1
   Chen YH, 2007, 2007 ENT SOC AM ANN
   Clements AN, 1999, Sensory reception and behaviour, V2, P740
   Cooperband MF, 2008, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V54, P1184, DOI 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.05.003
   Crawley M. J., 2013, The R Book, V2nd
   Das PC, 2005, AQUAC RES, V36, P785, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2005.01288.x
   Day JF, 2016, INSECTS, V7, DOI 10.3390/insects7040065
   DEHNHARD M, 1991, J CHROMATOGR-BIOMED, V566, P101, DOI 10.1016/0378-4347(91)80114-R
   DETHIER VG, 1960, J ECON ENTOMOL, V53, P134, DOI 10.1093/jee/53.1.134
   DETINOVA T S, 1962, Monogr Ser World Health Organ, V47, P13
   Dhar R, 1996, J MED ENTOMOL, V33, P195, DOI 10.1093/jmedent/33.2.195
   Dibal D., 2012, INT RES J MICROBIOLO, V2, P223
   ELDRIDGE BF, 1992, J AM MOSQUITO CONTR, V8, P104
   Ellis AM, 2008, J ANIM ECOL, V77, P247, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01345.x
   Eneh LK, 2019, MED VET ENTOMOL, V33, P56, DOI 10.1111/mve.12336
   Eneh L.K., MALARIA J, V15, P1
   Eneh L.K., 2016, MALARIA J, V15, P1
   Gloria-Soria A, 2019, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007930
   Hardy H., 2022, PARASIT VECTORS, V15, P1
   Harris C, 2013, PARASITE VECTOR, V6, DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-6-144
   HOUGHGOLDSTEIN J, 1992, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V21, P837, DOI 10.1093/ee/21.4.837
   Huang J, 2007, CHIN J CHROMATOGR, V25, P425
   Ignell R., 2022, COMBINED GAS CHROMAT, ppdb
   Ignell R, 2020, CURR OPIN INSECT SCI, V40, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.cois.2020.03.008
   Ijumba JN, 2001, MED VET ENTOMOL, V15, P1, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2001.00279.x
   Ijumba JN, 2002, MED VET ENTOMOL, V16, P28, DOI 10.1046/j.0269-283x.2002.00337.x
   IKESHOJI T, 1970, ANN ENTOMOL SOC AM, V63, P1322, DOI 10.1093/aesa/63.5.1322
   Jackson BT, 2005, J AM MOSQUITO CONTR, V21, P360, DOI 10.2987/8756-971X(2006)21[360:OPOCRA]2.0.CO;2
   Jarju LBS, 2009, MALARIA J, V8, DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-8-170
   Jeanrenaud ACSN, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0215552
   Kabula B, 2014, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V19, P331, DOI 10.1111/tmi.12248
   Kafy HT, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, pE11267, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1713814114
   Katambara Z., 2013, Agricultural Sciences, V4, P369, DOI 10.4236/as.2013.48053
   Kawada H, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0022574
   Kelleher BP, 2002, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V83, P27, DOI 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00133-X
   KENNEDY JS, 1976, PESTIC SCI, V7, P632, DOI 10.1002/ps.2780070614
   Kitau J, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0031481
   KRAMER WL, 1979, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V8, P1111, DOI 10.1093/ee/8.6.1111
   Kweka EJ, 2011, PARASITE VECTOR, V4, DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-4-129
   Latif MA, 2005, FIELD CROP RES, V93, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.10.005
   Mattson MP, 2008, AGEING RES REV, V7, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.arr.2007.08.007
   Mbuya N. P., 2014, International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, V5, P30
   Meertens HCC, 2003, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V65, P163, DOI 10.1023/A:1022103913683
   Meijerink J, 2001, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V47, P455, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1910(00)00136-0
   MEOLA R, 1972, J MED ENTOMOL, V9, P99, DOI 10.1093/jmedent/9.1.99
   Messenger L.A., 2017, MALARIA J, V16, P1
   Minakawa N, 2002, AM J TROP MED HYG, V67, P32, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.2002.67.32
   Muiruri SK, 2013, J VECTOR DIS, V50, P45
   Muriu SM, 2008, MALARIA J, V7, DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-7-43
   Mutero CM, 2004, ACTA TROP, V89, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2003.08.006
   Muturi EJ, 2008, J AM MOSQUITO CONTR, V24, P349, DOI 10.2987/5675.1
   Muturi EJ, 2006, J VECTOR ECOL, V31, P129, DOI 10.3376/1081-1710(2006)31[129:MSDAAI]2.0.CO;2
   Muturi EJ, 2013, J AM MOSQUITO CONTR, V29, P222, DOI 10.2987/13-6328R.1
   Mwangangi J, 2006, J VECTOR ECOL, V31, P245, DOI 10.3376/1081-1710(2006)31[245:DOISOA]2.0.CO;2
   Mwangangi JM, 2008, J VECTOR ECOL, V33, P129, DOI 10.3376/1081-1710(2008)33[129:CODAHT]2.0.CO;2
   Mwangangi Joseph M., 2006, Malaria Journal, V5, P1
   Mwingira V, 2020, J VECTOR ECOL, V45, P155, DOI 10.1111/jvec.12387
   Mwingira VS, 2020, J MED ENTOMOL, V57, P657, DOI 10.1093/jme/tjz172
   Nakai Yutaka, 1999, Animal Science Journal, V70, P32
   Ogola EO, 2019, PARASITE VECTOR, V12, DOI 10.1186/s13071-019-3332-z
   Okal MN, 2015, MALARIA J, V14, DOI 10.1186/s12936-015-0768-2
   Okal MN, 2013, MALARIA J, V12, DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-12-365
   Oliver SV, 2018, ACTA TROP, V188, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.08.030
   Opoku A.A., 2007, W AFR J APPL ECOL, V11, P81, DOI DOI 10.4314/WAJAE.V11I1.45730
   Otienoburu P. E., 2007, International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, V27, P2, DOI 10.1017/S1742758407706902
   Pekar S., 2016, MODERN ANAL BIOL DAT
   Perugini E, 2020, PARASITE VECTOR, V13, DOI 10.1186/s13071-020-04142-x
   Pintar MR, 2018, FUNCT ECOL, V32, P1589, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13086
   Powlson DS, 2022, SOIL USE MANAGE, V38, P622, DOI 10.1111/sum.12733
   R Core Team, 2019, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
   Rahman MM, 2013, COMMUN SOIL SCI PLAN, V44, P1457, DOI 10.1080/00103624.2012.760575
   Rajapaksha RDT, 2021, INSECTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/insects12040313
   Ranadheera CS, 2017, WORLD POULTRY SCI J, V73, P365, DOI [10.1017/S0043933917000083, 10.1017/s0043933917000083]
   Rapatsa MM, 2015, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V44, P990, DOI 10.1093/ee/nvv083
   Saha N, 2014, MED VET ENTOMOL, V28, P1, DOI 10.1111/mve.12003
   Samuel M, 2020, PEST MANAG SCI, V76, P1560, DOI 10.1002/ps.5676
   Schoelitsz B, 2020, J CHEM ECOL, V46, P397, DOI 10.1007/s10886-020-01175-5
   SERVICE MW, 1989, PARASITOL TODAY, V5, P162, DOI 10.1016/0169-4758(89)90083-5
   Shabtay A, 2009, J ANIM SCI, V87, P1835, DOI 10.2527/jas.2008-1357
   Sinka M.E., 2010, PARASIT VECTORS
   Sinka ME, 2012, PARASITE VECTOR, V5, DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-5-69
   Sissoko MS, 2004, ACTA TROP, V89, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2003.10.015
   Smallegange RC, 2005, CHEM SENSES, V30, P145, DOI 10.1093/chemse/bji010
   Spiehs MJ, 2009, J ANIM SCI, V87, P2977, DOI 10.2527/jas.2008-1584
   Stoop WA, 2002, AGR SYST, V71, P249, DOI 10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00070-1
   Suh E, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0149800
   Sumba Leunita A., 2004, International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, V24, P260, DOI 10.1079/IJT200433
   Takken W, 2013, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V58, P433, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153618
   Thakur AK, 2017, AGRON J, V109, P1163, DOI 10.2134/agronj2016.03.0162
   Tirados I, 2006, MED VET ENTOMOL, V20, P425, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2006.652.x
   Tzollas NM, 2010, INT J ENVIRON AN CH, V90, P115, DOI 10.1080/03067310902962528
   van Vliet PCJ, 2007, J DAIRY SCI, V90, P5146, DOI 10.3168/jds.2007-0065
   Victor TJ, 2000, MED VET ENTOMOL, V14, P361, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2000.00255.x
   Wallingford AK, 2016, PEST MANAG SCI, V72, P701, DOI 10.1002/ps.4040
   Wang Y, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V199, P882, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.222
   WITTER E, 1991, J SOIL SCI, V42, P369, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1991.tb00415.x
   Wondwosen B, 2017, MALARIA J, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12936-016-1656-0
   Wondwosen B, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep37930
   Woodbury BL, 2016, T ASABE, V59, P885, DOI 10.13031/trans.59.11374
   YASUHARA A, 1987, J CHROMATOGR, V387, P371, DOI 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)94539-X
   Yoshioka M, 2012, PARASITE VECTOR, V5, DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-5-225
NR 111
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 4
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0001-706X
EI 1873-6254
J9 ACTA TROP
JI Acta Trop.
PD AUG
PY 2023
VL 244
AR 106954
DI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2023.106954
EA JUN 2023
PG 11
WC Parasitology; Tropical Medicine
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Parasitology; Tropical Medicine
GA K0MR9
UT WOS:001013481500001
PM 37244404
OA hybrid, Green Accepted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Farooq, Z
   Rocklöv, J
   Wallin, J
   Abiri, N
   Sewe, MO
   Sjödin, H
   Semenza, JC
AF Farooq, Zia
   Rockloev, Joacim
   Wallin, Jonas
   Abiri, Najmeh
   Sewe, Maquines Odhiambo
   Sjodin, Henrik
   Semenza, Jan C.
TI Artificial intelligence to predict West Nile virus outbreaks with
   eco-climatic drivers
SO LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-EUROPE
LA English
DT Article
DE West Nile virus; Culex vectors; Europe; XGBoost; SHAP; Outbreaks
   management; Early warning sys-; tems; forecasting; Climate adaptation;
   Preparedness; Emerging infectious disease
ID LINEAGE 2; EPIDEMIOLOGY; CULEX; TEMPERATURE; INFECTION; DIPTERA; EUROPE;
   SPREAD
AB Background In Europe, the frequency, intensity, and geographic range of West Nile virus (WNV)-outbreaks have increased over the past decade, with a 7.2-fold increase in 2018 compared to 2017, and a markedly expanded geographic area compared to 2010. The reasons for this increase and range expansion remain largely unknown due to the complexity of the transmission pathways and underlying disease drivers. In a first, we use advanced artificial intelligence to disentangle the contribution of eco-climatic drivers to WNV-outbreaks across Europe using decade long (2010-2019) data at high spatial resolution. Methods We use a high-performance machine learning classifier, XGBoost (eXtreme gradient boosting) combined with state-of-the-art XAI (eXplainable artificial intelligence) methodology to describe the predictive ability and contribution of different drivers of the emergence and transmission of WNV-outbreaks in Europe, respectively. Findings Our model, trained on 2010-2017 data achieved an AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) score of 0.97 and 0.93 when tested with 2018 and 2019 data, respectively, showing a high discriminatory power to classify a WNV-endemic area. Overall, positive summer/spring temperatures anomalies, lower water availability index (NDWI), and drier winter conditions were found to be the main determinants of WNV-outbreaks across Europe. The climate trends of the preceding year in combination with eco-climatic predictors of the first half of the year provided a robust predictive ability of the entire transmission season ahead of time. For the extraordinary 2018 outbreak year, relatively higher spring temperatures and the abundance of Culex mosquitoes were the strongest predictors, in addition to past climatic trends. Interpretation Our AI-based framework can be deployed to trigger rapid and timely alerts for active surveillance and vector control measures in order to intercept an imminent WNV-outbreak in Europe. Funding The work was partially funded by the Swedish Research Council FORMAS for the project ARBOPREVENT (grant agreement 2018-05973). The Health 2022;17: Published https://doi.org/10.1016/j. lanepe.2022.100370
C1 [Farooq, Zia; Sewe, Maquines Odhiambo; Sjodin, Henrik] Umea Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, Sect Sustainable Hlth, Umea, Sweden.
   [Rockloev, Joacim; Semenza, Jan C.] Heidelberg Univ, Heidelberg Inst Global Hlth, Neunheimer Feld 205, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
   [Rockloev, Joacim; Semenza, Jan C.] Heidelberg Univ, Interdisciplinary Ctr Sci Comp, Neunheimer Feld 205, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
   [Wallin, Jonas; Abiri, Najmeh] Lund Univ, Dept Stat, Lund, Sweden.
C3 Umea University; Ruprecht Karls University Heidelberg; Ruprecht Karls
   University Heidelberg; Lund University
RP Rocklöv, J (corresponding author), Heidelberg Univ, Heidelberg Inst Global Hlth, Neunheimer Feld 205, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.; Rocklöv, J (corresponding author), Heidelberg Univ, Interdisciplinary Ctr Sci Comp, Neunheimer Feld 205, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
OI Rocklov, Joacim/0000-0003-4030-0449; Sjodin, Henrik/0000-0003-1235-4781;
   Abiri, Najmeh/0009-0005-3302-3641
FU Swedish Research Council FORMAS [2018-05973]; European center for
   disease preven-tion and control (ECDC)
FX Acknowledgments This study was partially funded by the Swedish Research
   Council FORMAS for the project ARBOPRE-VENT (grant agreement 2018-05973)
   . We thank and acknowledge the European center for disease preven-tion
   and control (ECDC) for providing the WNV human infections data to make
   this study possible.
CR Tran A, 2014, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V13, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-13-26
   [Anonymous], 2018, Epidemiological update: West Nile virus transmission season in Europe
   [Anonymous], Factsheet about West Nile virus infection
   [Anonymous], 2011, Modeling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals
   [Anonymous], 2021, EUROPEAN CLIMATE HLT
   [Anonymous], 2022, EU4 HLTH 2021 2027 V
   [Anonymous], The European Green Deal-European Commission
   Diniz DFA, 2017, PARASITE VECTOR, V10, DOI 10.1186/s13071-017-2235-0
   Aybar C., 2020, Journal of Open Source Software, V5, P2272, DOI [10.21105/joss.02272, DOI 10.21105/JOSS.02272]
   Bakonyi T, 2013, VET MICROBIOL, V165, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.03.005
   Balenghien T, 2008, VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOT, V8, P589, DOI 10.1089/vbz.2007.0266
   Barker CM, 2019, J MED ENTOMOL, V56, P1508, DOI 10.1093/jme/tjz150
   Barzon L, 2013, VIRUSES-BASEL, V5, P2825, DOI 10.3390/v5112825
   Calzolari M, 2020, FRONT VET SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fvets.2020.00243
   Calzolari M, 2013, VET ITAL, V49, P315
   Camp JV, 2020, EXPERT REV ANTI-INFE, V18, P145, DOI 10.1080/14787210.2020.1713751
   Candeloro L, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12183064
   Chancey C, 2015, BIOMED RES INT, V2015, DOI 10.1155/2015/376230
   Chase JM, 2003, ECOL LETT, V6, P1017, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00533.x
   Chen TQ, 2016, KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, P785, DOI 10.1145/2939672.2939785
   Commission E, 2021, EU AD STRAT
   Cook RL, 2010, AM J TROP MED HYG, V83, P1133, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0717
   Copernicus Climate Change Service, CLIMATE CHANGE
   Danis K, 2011, EMERG INFECT DIS, V17, P1868, DOI 10.3201/eid1710.110525
   Davis Justin K, 2017, PLoS Curr, V9, DOI 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.90e80717c4e67e1a830f17feeaaf85de
   European Center for Disease Prevention and Control, MONK OUTBR
   European Environment Agency, About us
   Ewing DA, 2016, J THEOR BIOL, V400, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.04.008
   Fereidouni SR, 2011, VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOT, V11, P1377, DOI 10.1089/vbz.2010.0244
   García-Carrasco JM, 2021, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009022
   Golding N, 2012, PARASITE VECTOR, V5, DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-5-32
   HARBACH RE, 1984, P ENTOMOL SOC WASH, V86, P521
   Harrigan RJ, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0015437
   Hayes EB, 2006, ANNU REV MED, V57, P181, DOI 10.1146/annurev.med.57.121304.131418
   Hernández-Triana LM, 2014, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V2, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00271
   Hubálek Z, 2019, ZOONOSES PUBLIC HLTH, V66, P978, DOI 10.1111/zph.12638
   Keyel AC, 2021, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009653
   Kriticos DJ, 2014, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V5, P956, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12244
   Kutasi O, 2011, J VET INTERN MED, V25, P586, DOI 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2011.0715.x
   Lahti L, 2017, R J, V9, P385
   Landesman WJ, 2007, VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOT, V7, P337, DOI 10.1089/vbz.2006.0590
   Leggewie M, 2016, ONE HEALTH, V2, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.onehlt.2016.04.001
   Lundberg SM, 2017, ADV NEUR IN, V30
   Lundberg SM, 2020, NAT MACH INTELL, V2, P56, DOI 10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9
   Marcantonio M, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0121158
   Marini G, 2020, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007953
   Martinez-de la Puente J, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-20825-z
   Michel F, 2019, VIRUSES-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/v11070674
   Mordecai EA, 2019, ECOL LETT, V22, P1690, DOI 10.1111/ele.13335
   Morin CW, 2018, CURR ENV HLTH REP, V5, P430, DOI 10.1007/s40572-018-0221-0
   ODonnell M.S., 2012, Data Series, V691, P10, DOI 10.3133/ds691
   Osman AIA, 2021, AIN SHAMS ENG J, V12, P1545, DOI 10.1016/j.asej.2020.11.011
   Pan BY, 2018, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V113, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/113/1/012127
   Parselia E, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11161862
   Paz S, 2019, EMERG TOP LIFE SCI, V3, P143, DOI 10.1042/ETLS20180124
   Paz S, 2013, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V10, P3543, DOI 10.3390/ijerph10083543
   Paz S, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056398
   Pecoraro HL, 2007, J VECTOR ECOL, V32, P22, DOI 10.3376/1081-1710(2007)32[22:CALCFP]2.0.CO;2
   Peres RS, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P79908, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2923405
   Peters DPC, 2020, ECOSPHERE, V11, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.3157
   Petrovic T, 2013, EUROSURVEILLANCE, V18, P7, DOI 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2013.18.44.20622
   Poh KC, 2020, SPAT SPATIO-TEMPORAL, V33, DOI 10.1016/j.sste.2020.100336
   Radojicic S, 2021, ANIMALS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/ani11102951
   Randolph SE, 2010, NAT REV MICROBIOL, V8, P361, DOI 10.1038/nrmicro2336
   Reisen WK, 2006, J MED ENTOMOL, V43, P309, DOI 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)043[0309:EOTOTT]2.0.CO;2
   Riccardo F, 2020, GLOBALIZATION HEALTH, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12992-020-00568-1
   Rochlin I, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0023280
   Rosà R, 2014, PARASITE VECTOR, V7, DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-7-269
   Rudolf I, 2014, EUROSURVEILLANCE, V19, P2, DOI 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.31.20867
   Sejvar JJ, 2014, VIRUSES-BASEL, V6, P606, DOI 10.3390/v6020606
   Semenza JC, 2021, LANCET REG HEALTH-EU, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100230
   Semenza JC, 2017, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V125, DOI 10.1289/EHP2198
   Semenza JC, 2016, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12940-016-0105-4
   Semenza JC, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P432, DOI 10.1038/nclimate1867
   Shapiro LLM, 2017, PLOS BIOL, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003489
   Shapley Lloyd S., 1951, Notes on the n-Person Game-II: The Value of an n-Person Game
   Shocket MS, 2020, ELIFE, V9, DOI 10.7554/eLife.58511
   Sirbu A, 2011, EUROSURVEILLANCE, V16, P2
   Soverow JE, 2009, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V117, P1049, DOI 10.1289/ehp.0800487
   Vlaskamp DRM, 2020, EUROSURVEILLANCE, V25, DOI 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.46.2001904
   Vogels CBF, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-05185-4
   Vogels CBF, 2016, PARASITE VECTOR, V9, DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1677-0
   Wang GM, 2010, BMC INFECT DIS, V10, DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-10-38
   Wieland R, 2021, ECOL MODEL, V452, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109594
   Young SG, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V45, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.022
   Ziegler U, 2020, VIRUSES-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/v12040448
   Ziegler U, 2019, ANTIVIR RES, V162, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.12.005
NR 87
TC 35
Z9 37
U1 6
U2 28
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2666-7762
J9 LANCET REG HEALTH-EU
JI Lancet Reg. Health-Eur.
PD JUN
PY 2022
VL 17
AR 100370
DI 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100370
EA MAR 2022
PG 13
WC Health Care Sciences & Services; Public, Environmental & Occupational
   Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Health Care Sciences & Services; Public, Environmental & Occupational
   Health
GA 1H2JY
UT WOS:000796373200002
PM 35373173
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Aycrigg, JL
   Mccarley, TR
   Belote, RT
   Martinuzzi, S
AF Aycrigg, Jocelyn L.
   Mccarley, T. Ryan
   Belote, R. Travis
   Martinuzzi, Sebastian
TI Wilderness areas in a changing landscape: changes in land use, land
   cover, and climate
SO ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; land cover; land use; landscape; National Wilderness
   Preservation System; protected areas; wilderness
ID UNITED-STATES; EXTREME WEATHER; PROTECTED AREAS; PRESERVATION SYSTEM;
   FROST DAMAGE; HABITAT LOSS; FUTURE; BIODIVERSITY; FOREST; REPRODUCTION
AB Wilderness areas are not immune to changes in land use, land cover, and/or climate. Future changes will intensify the balancing act of maintaining ecological conditions and untrammeled character within wilderness areas. We assessed the quantitative and spatial changes in land use, land cover, and climate predicted to occur in and around wilderness areas by (1) quantifying projected changes in land use and land cover around wilderness areas; (2) evaluating if public lands surrounding wilderness areas can buffer future land-use change; (3) quantifying future climate conditions in and around wilderness areas; and (4) identifying wilderness areas expected to experience the most change in land use, land cover, and climate. We used projections of land use (four variables), land cover (five variables), and climate (nine variables) to assess changes for 707 wilderness areas in the contiguous United States by mid-21st century under two scenarios (medium-low and high). We ranked all wilderness areas relative to each other by summing and ranking decile values for each land use, land cover, and climate variable and calculating a multivariate metric of future change. All wilderness areas were projected to experience some level of change by mid-century. The greatest land-use changes were associated with increases in agriculture, clear cutting, and developed land, while the greatest land cover changes were observed for grassland, forest, and shrubland. In 51.6% and 73.8% of wilderness areas, core area of natural vegetation surrounding wilderness was projected to decrease for the medium-low and high scenarios, respectfully. Presence of public land did not mitigate the influence of land-use change around wilderness areas. Geographically, projected changes occurred throughout the contiguous U.S., with areas in the northeast and upper Midwest projected to have the greatest land-use and climate change and the southwestern U.S. projected to undergo the greatest land cover and climate change. Our results provide insights into potential future threats to wilderness areas and the challenges associated with wilderness stewardship and climate adaptation. Despite the high degree of protection and remoteness of wilderness areas, effective management and preservation of these lands must consider future changes in land use, land cover, and climate.
C1 [Aycrigg, Jocelyn L.; Mccarley, T. Ryan] Univ Idaho, Coll Nat Resources, Dept Fish & Tidlife Sci, Moscow, ID 83844 USA.
   [Belote, R. Travis] Wilderness Soc, Bozeman, MT 59715 USA.
   [Martinuzzi, Sebastian] Univ Wisconsin, SILVIS Lab, Dept Forest & Wildlife Ecol, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
C3 University of Idaho; University of Wisconsin System; University of
   Wisconsin Madison
RP Aycrigg, JL (corresponding author), Univ Idaho, Coll Nat Resources, Dept Fish & Tidlife Sci, Moscow, ID 83844 USA.
EM aycrigg@uidaho.edu
RI Aycrigg, Jocelyn/AAA-5719-2020; McCarley, Ryan/AAU-2276-2020
OI Aycrigg, Jocelyn/0000-0002-6511-7985
FU Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute through USFS
   [17JV11221639050]
FX We thank Susan Fox, Beth Hahn, and Sean Parks for their valuable input
   throughout this project. Funding was provided by the Aldo Leopold
   Wilderness Research Institute through USFS Agreement No.
   17JV11221639050. We thank Volker Radeloff and Dave Helmers at the SILVIS
   Laboratory in the Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology at the
   University of Wisconsin and Andy Allstadt at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
   Service for sharing their knowledge and data. Input from an anonymous
   reviewer and James Watson is appreciated. The authors declare no
   conflicts of interest. JLA, TRM, RTB, and SM conceived of the research
   idea and design. JLA and TRM carried out the research. TRM conducted the
   analyses. JLA, TRM, RTB, and SM wrote, revised, and reviewed the
   manuscript.
CR Abatzoglou JT, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P11770, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1607171113
   Allen CD, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P14839, DOI 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14839
   Allstadt AJ, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/104008
   Aplet GH, 2017, ECOSYST HEALTH SUST, V3, DOI 10.1002/ehs2.1261
   Aplet GH, 2010, BEYOND NATURALNESS: RETHINKING PARK AND WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP IN AN ERA OF RAPID CHANGE, P12
   Appel, 2015, GEORGE WASHINGTON J, V6, P52
   Augspurger CK, 2013, ECOLOGY, V94, P41, DOI 10.1890/12-0200.1
   Aycrigg JL, 2016, J FOREST, V114, P396, DOI 10.5849/jof.15-050
   Aycrigg JL, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054689
   Baldwin RF, 2019, LAND-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/land8030043
   Barbero R, 2015, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V24, P892, DOI 10.1071/WF15083
   Barros V, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, pIX
   Belote RT, 2020, CONSERV SCI PRACT, V2, DOI 10.1111/csp2.196
   Belote RT, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-27721-6
   Belote RT, 2017, BIOSCIENCE, V67, P494, DOI 10.1093/biosci/bix028
   Belote RT, 2017, ECOL APPL, V27, P1050, DOI 10.1002/eap.1527
   Belote RT, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0154223
   Belote RT, 2015, NORTHWEST SCI, V89, P239, DOI 10.3955/046.089.0311
   Blois JL, 2013, SCIENCE, V341, P499, DOI 10.1126/science.1237184
   Brooks TM, 2002, CONSERV BIOL, V16, P909, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00530.x
   Buotte PC, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V399, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.05.032
   Carroll C, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0140486
   Convention on Biological Diversity, 2020, UPD ZER DRAFT POST 2
   Cudmore TJ, 2010, J APPL ECOL, V47, P1036, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01848.x
   Dawson C.P., 2009, Wilderness management: Stewardship and protection of resources and values, V4th
   Di Marco M, 2019, NATURE, V573, P582, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1567-7
   Elsen PR, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aay0814
   Elsen PR, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P6004, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1720141115
   Foley JA, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P570, DOI 10.1126/science.1111772
   Garcia RA, 2014, SCIENCE, V344, P486, DOI 10.1126/science.1247579
   Gaston KJ, 2008, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V39, P93, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173529
   Gimmi U, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.006
   Goetz SJ, 2009, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V113, P1421, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2008.07.019
   Haddad NM, 2015, SCI ADV, V1, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1500052
   Hamilton CM, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0055737
   Hansen AJ, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P974, DOI 10.1890/05-1098
   Hayhoe K., 2017, CLIMATE SCI SPECIAL, VI, P133, DOI [DOI 10.7930/J0WH2N54, 10.7930/J0WH2N54]
   Hilty J., 2020, GUIDELINES CONSERVIN, DOI [DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.PAG.30.EN, 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.PAG.30.en]
   Hobbs RJ, 2010, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V8, P483, DOI 10.1890/090089
   Hoffmann S, 2020, DIVERS DISTRIB, V26, P1496, DOI 10.1111/ddi.13136
   Hoffmann S, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-10593-3
   Holsinger L, 2019, CONSERV SCI PRACT, V1, DOI 10.1111/csp2.50
   Hoover DL, 2014, ECOLOGY, V95, P2646, DOI 10.1890/13-2186.1
   Huang CQ, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.017
   Inouye DW, 2008, ECOLOGY, V89, P353, DOI 10.1890/06-2128.1
   Inouye DW, 2000, ECOL LETT, V3, P457, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00165.x
   IPCC, 2000, LAND USE LAND USE CH
   Isbell F, 2015, NATURE, V526, P574, DOI 10.1038/nature15374
   Jones KR, 2018, SCIENCE, V360, P788, DOI 10.1126/science.aap9565
   Keeley ATH, 2018, CONSERV BIOL, V32, P1221, DOI 10.1111/cobi.13158
   Keetch J. J., 1968, Research Papers. Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, P32
   Kral-O'Brien KC, 2019, AGR ENV LETT, V4, DOI 10.2134/ael2019.07.0025
   Lambin EF, 2001, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V11, P261, DOI [10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3, 10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105459]
   Langdon JGR, 2015, ECOSPHERE, V6, DOI 10.1890/ES14-00400.1
   Lieberman L, 2018, RESTOR ECOL, V26, P900, DOI 10.1111/rec.12670
   Loarie SR, 2009, NATURE, V462, P1052, DOI 10.1038/nature08649
   Long E., 2014, Environmental Law, V44, P623
   Lugo Ariel E., 2014, US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Proceedings RMRS-P, V71, P47
   Mansuy N, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1bc5
   Mantyka-Pringle CS, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P1239, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02593.x
   Marino GP, 2011, ENVIRON RES LETT, V6, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024015
   Martin TG, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P122, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2918
   Martinuzzi S, 2013, ECOSPHERE, V4, DOI 10.1890/ES12-00376.1
   Martinuzzi S, 2019, ECOL APPL, V29, DOI 10.1002/eap.1904
   Martinuzzi S, 2016, BIOL CONSERV, V201, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.007
   Martinuzzi S, 2015, BIOL CONSERV, V184, P446, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.02.015
   Maxwell SL, 2019, DIVERS DISTRIB, V25, P613, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12878
   McKechnie AE, 2010, BIOL LETTERS, V6, P253, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0702
   McKibben B, 2014, NEW YORK REV BOOKS, V61, P46
   Michalak JL, 2018, CONSERV BIOL, V32, P1414, DOI 10.1111/cobi.13130
   Millar B.N.L, 2012, PARK SCI, V28, P1
   Newbold T, 2016, SCIENCE, V353, P288, DOI 10.1126/science.aaf2201
   Ordonez A, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P811, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2337, 10.1038/nclimate2337]
   Pardee GL, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P848, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13865
   Parisien MA, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/075005
   Parks SA, 2018, ECOGRAPHY, V41, P910, DOI 10.1111/ecog.03378
   Parmesan C, 2000, B AM METEOROL SOC, V81, P443, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<0443:IOEWAC>2.3.CO;2
   Pecl GT, 2017, SCIENCE, V355, DOI 10.1126/science.aai9214
   Peters MK, 2019, NATURE, V568, P88, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1048-z
   Peterson AG, 2014, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V41, P2156, DOI 10.1002/2014GL059266
   Radeloff VC, 2012, ECOL APPL, V22, P1036, DOI 10.1890/11-0306.1
   Radeloff VC, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P940, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0911131107
   Seto KC, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P16083, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1211658109
   Sohl TL, 2016, ECOL MODEL, V337, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.07.016
   Sohl TL, 2014, ECOL APPL, V24, P1015, DOI 10.1890/13-1245.1
   Sohl TL, 2007, J LAND USE SCI, V2, P103, DOI 10.1080/17474230701218202
   Soille P, 2009, PATTERN RECOGN LETT, V30, P456, DOI 10.1016/j.patrec.2008.10.015
   Stehfest E, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-09945-w
   Suggitt AJ, 2017, OIKOS, V126, P1533, DOI 10.1111/oik.04203
   Theobald DM, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1859, DOI 10.1007/s10980-013-9941-6
   Tierney JE, 2020, SCIENCE, V370, P680, DOI 10.1126/science.aay3701
   Turner B.L., 1994, CHANGES LAND USE LAN, P3
   U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2011, WHIT PIN PIN ALB 12
   U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Gap Analysis Project (GAP), 2016, PROT AR DAT US PAD U
   van Vuuren DP, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P373, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0906-1
   Venter O, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms12558
   Vogt P, 2017, EUR J REMOTE SENS, V50, P352, DOI 10.1080/22797254.2017.1330650
   Watson JEM, 2018, NATURE, V563, P27, DOI 10.1038/d41586-018-07183-6
   Watson JEM, 2016, CURR BIOL, V26, P2929, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.049
   Williams CM, 2015, BIOL REV, V90, P214, DOI 10.1111/brv.12105
   Wilson TS, 2015, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V15, P1051, DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0686-9
   Zhang FY, 2019, J ECOL, V107, P2553, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13226
NR 102
TC 9
Z9 11
U1 10
U2 143
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1051-0761
EI 1939-5582
J9 ECOL APPL
JI Ecol. Appl.
PD JAN
PY 2022
VL 32
IS 1
AR e02471
DI 10.1002/eap.2471
EA NOV 2021
PG 20
WC Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA XY9DV
UT WOS:000715867000001
PM 34626517
OA hybrid, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Jiang, YF
   Huang, J
   Shi, TM
   Wang, HX
AF Jiang, Yunfang
   Huang, Jing
   Shi, Tiemao
   Wang, Hongxiang
TI Interaction of Urban Rivers and Green Space Morphology to Mitigate the
   Urban Heat Island Effect: Case-Based Comparative Analysis
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH
LA English
DT Article
DE urban heat island (UHI); blue-green space; spatial morphology; urban
   cooling effect (UCI); boosted regression trees (BRT); marginal effect
   (ME); Shanghai
ID LAND-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; THERMAL ENVIRONMENT; SPATIAL-PATTERN; SHADE
   TREES; WATER BODY; VEGETATION; CLIMATE; SIZE; AIR; CONNECTIVITY
AB The spatial morphology of waterfront green spaces helps generate cooling effects to mitigate the urban heat island effect (UHI) in metropolis cities. To explore the contribution and influence of multi-dimensional spatial indices on the mitigation of UHIs, the green space of the riparian buffer along 18 river channels in Shanghai was considered as a case study. The spatial distribution data of the land surface temperature (LST) in the study area were obtained by using remote sensing images. By selecting the related spatial structure morphological factors of the waterfront green space as the quantitative description index, the growth regression tree model (BRT) was adapted to analyze the contribution of various indexes of the waterfront green space on the distribution of the LST and the marginal effect of blue-green synergistic cooling. In addition, mathematical statistical analysis and spatial analysis methods were used to study the influence of the morphological group (MG) types of riparian green spaces with different morphological characteristics on the LST. The results showed that in terms of the spatial structure variables between blue and green spaces, the contribution of river widths larger than 30 m was more notable in decreasing the LST. In the case of a larger river width, the marginal effect of synergistic cooling could be observed in farther regions. The green space that had the highest connectivity degree and was located in the leeward direction of the river exhibited the lowest LST. In terms of the spatial morphology, the fractional cover values of the vegetation (Fv) and area (A) of the green space were the main factors affecting the cooling effect of the green space. For all MG types, a large green patch that had a high green coverage and connectivity degree, as well as was distributed in the leeward direction of the river, corresponded to the lowest LST. The research presented herein can provide methods and development suggestions for optimizing spatial thermal comfort in climate adaptive cities.
C1 [Jiang, Yunfang; Huang, Jing] East China Normal Univ, Sch Urban & Reg Sci, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China.
   [Jiang, Yunfang; Huang, Jing] East China Normal Univ, Ctr Modern Chinese City Studies, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China.
   [Jiang, Yunfang; Huang, Jing] East China Normal Univ, Res Ctr China, Adm Div, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China.
   [Shi, Tiemao] Shenyang Jianzhu Univ, Inst Spatial Planning & Design, Shenyang 110168, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Hongxiang] Sichuan Int Studies Univ, Sch Journalism & Commun, Chongqing 400031, Peoples R China.
C3 East China Normal University; East China Normal University; East China
   Normal University; Shenyang Jianzhu University; Sichuan International
   Studies University
RP Jiang, YF (corresponding author), East China Normal Univ, Sch Urban & Reg Sci, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China.; Jiang, YF (corresponding author), East China Normal Univ, Ctr Modern Chinese City Studies, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China.; Jiang, YF (corresponding author), East China Normal Univ, Res Ctr China, Adm Div, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China.; Shi, TM (corresponding author), Shenyang Jianzhu Univ, Inst Spatial Planning & Design, Shenyang 110168, Peoples R China.
EM yfjiang@re.ecnu.edu.cn; jhuang@stu.ecnu.edu.cn; tiemaos@sjzu.edu.cn;
   elainewhx@163.com
OI Jiang, Yunfang/0000-0002-5025-4741
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China project [51878279,
   51878418, 51578344]
FX This research study was funded by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China project (grant numbers 51878279, 51878418, and
   51578344).
CR Aflaki A, 2017, CITIES, V62, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.003
   Akbari H, 2001, SOL ENERGY, V70, P295, DOI 10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00089-X
   Bodin Ö, 2010, ECOL MODEL, V221, P2393, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.06.017
   Cao X, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V96, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.03.008
   Chan EYY, 2012, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V66, P322, DOI 10.1136/jech.2008.085167
   Chen AL, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V45, P424, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.002
   [陈蕾 Chen Lei], 2020, [长江流域资源与环境, Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin], V29, P322
   Cuculic M., 2012, P 4 EPAM EUR PAV ASS
   De'ath G, 2007, ECOLOGY, V88, P243, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[243:BTFEMA]2.0.CO;2
   DICKSON RE, 1995, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V51, P27, DOI 10.1016/0034-4257(94)00062-R
   Dong J, 1998, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V53, P309, DOI 10.1006/jema.1998.0217
   Du HY, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V67, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.040
   Elith J, 2008, J ANIM ECOL, V77, P802, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x
   Fan HY, 2019, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V265, P338, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.11.027
   Fang J., 2014, WATER SAV IRRIG, V11, P68, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1007-4929.2014.11.019, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1007-4929.2014.11.019]
   Firozjaei MK, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107264
   Gitelson AA, 2002, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V80, P76, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00289-9
   Grimmond CSB, 1999, J APPL METEOROL, V38, P922, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<0922:HSIUAL>2.0.CO;2
   Grunwald L, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V201, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103843
   Gunawardena KR, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V584, P1040, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.158
   Hathway EA, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V58, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.013
   Heggem DT, 2000, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V64, P41, DOI 10.1023/A:1006486316518
   Herb WR, 2005, WATER RESOUR RES, V41, DOI 10.1029/2003WR002613
   Hu YF, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V266, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110424
   Jaeger JAG, 2000, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V15, P115, DOI 10.1023/A:1008129329289
   Jaganmohan M, 2016, J ENVIRON QUAL, V45, P134, DOI 10.2134/jeq2015.01.0062
   Ji Peng, 2012, Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao, V23, P679
   [姜会飞 Jiang Huifei], 2004, [中国农业气象, Agricultural Meteorology of China], V25, P1
   Jiang L, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102835
   Jiang YF, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17228684
   Jiang YF, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10093189
   Jiménez-Muñoz JC, 2014, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V11, P1840, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2014.2312032
   KATZ JS, 1994, SCIENTOMETRICS, V31, P31, DOI 10.1007/BF02018100
   Kong FH, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V128, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.018
   Kundu S, 2017, ECOL ENG, V105, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.04.061
   Li C., 2016, REFRIG AIR CONDITION, V30, P262, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1671-6612.2016.03.025, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1671-6612.2016.03.025]
   Liang SL, 2001, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V76, P213, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00205-4
   Lin BS, 2010, HORTSCIENCE, V45, P83, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.45.1.83
   Liu B.Y., 2015, Landsc. Archit, V6, P46
   Masoudi M, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V184, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.023
   Moyer AN, 2017, URBAN CLIM, V21, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2017.07.004
   MURAKAWA S, 1991, ENERG BUILDINGS, V16, P993, DOI 10.1016/0378-7788(91)90094-J
   OKE TR, 1982, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V108, P1, DOI 10.1002/qj.49710845502
   Pan L., 1997, SCI ATMOS SINICA, V21, P39
   Peng J, 2018, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V215, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2018.06.010
   Peng J, 2016, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V173, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2015.11.027
   Purevdorj T, 1998, INT J REMOTE SENS, V19, P3519, DOI 10.1080/014311698213795
   Qi J, 2000, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V105, P55, DOI 10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00195-7
   Sailor DJ, 2011, INT J CLIMATOL, V31, P189, DOI 10.1002/joc.2106
   Saura S, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V83, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.03.005
   Shanghai Water Authority, 2017 SHANGH RIV CHAN
   Sharma R, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100751
   Shi X., 2005, J CHIN URBAN FOR, V3, P46, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1672-4925.2005.03.018, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-4925.2005.03.018]
   Shih WY, 2017, HABITAT INT, V60, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.12.006
   Skelhorn C, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V121, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.012
   Skoulika F, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V123, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.002
   Sun RH, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V105, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.018
   Syafii NI, 2016, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V169, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.10.023
   Taha H, 1997, ENERG BUILDINGS, V25, P99, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(96)00999-1
   Tallis M, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V103, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.003
   Teng M., 2011, PLANNING ECOLOGICAL, DOI [10.7666/d.Y2162475, DOI 10.7666/D.Y2162475]
   The People's Government of Zhejiang Province, DB33T6142016
   Theeuwes NE, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V118, P8881, DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50704
   Voogt JA, 2003, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V86, P370, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00079-8
   Wang SS, 2002, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V55, P451, DOI 10.1023/A:1020780211008
   [王艳姣 WANG Yan-jiao], 2009, [环境科学研究, Research of Environmental Sciences], V22, P215
   Weather Underground Web, 2017, HONGQIAO DAILY OBSER
   Webb BW, 1997, HYDROL PROCESS, V11, P79, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199701)11:1<79::AID-HYP404>3.0.CO;2-N
   Wu JS, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V117, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106699
   Xue ZS, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V182, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.015
   Yang GY, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101932
   Yang H, 2015, WATER RESOUR PLAN DE, V10, P112, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1672-2469.20l5.10.36, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-2469.20L5.10.36]
   [杨凯 Yang Kai], 2004, [华东师范大学学报. 自然科学版, Journal of East China Normal University.Natural Science], V0, P105
   Yoon J., 2007, C SEOUL BUILDING, P477
   Yu XL, 2014, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V6, P9829, DOI 10.3390/rs6109829
   Yu ZW, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126630
   Yu ZW, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V82, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.002
   [岳文泽 Yue Wenze], 2013, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V33, P1852
   Zhang J., 2020, ENV SCI SURV, V39, P19
   Zhang Y, 2012, CHINESE J GEOPHYS-CH, V55, P1121, DOI 10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.04.007
   Zhao SQ, 2016, ENVIRON POLLUT, V208, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.07.037
   [周立晨 Zhou Lichen], 2005, [生态学杂志, Chinese Journal of Ecology], V24, P1102
NR 82
TC 35
Z9 38
U1 29
U2 269
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 1660-4601
J9 INT J ENV RES PUB HE
JI Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
PD NOV
PY 2021
VL 18
IS 21
AR 11404
DI 10.3390/ijerph182111404
PG 29
WC Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational
   Health
GA WY6PC
UT WOS:000719400200001
PM 34769917
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Ma, RM
   Xie, MM
   Yun, WJ
   Zhu, DH
AF Ma, Ruiming
   Xie, Miaomiao
   Yun, Wenju
   Zhu, Dehai
TI Evaluating Responses of Temperature Regulating Service to Landscape
   Pattern Based on 'Source-Sink' Theory
SO ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION
LA English
DT Article
DE "source-sink" landscape; landscape pattern; temperature regulating
   service; Shenzhen
ID LAND-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; URBAN HEAT-ISLAND; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES;
   USE/LAND-COVER; CITY SIZE; VEGETATION; INDEX; RETRIEVAL; INDIANAPOLIS;
   METRICS
AB Thermal remote sensing provides a method to describe spatial heterogeneity of the "urban heat island" effect and to evaluate the function of temperature regulation. Rapid urbanization and heatwave events with increasing frequencies need a quantitative analysis on the supply and demand for an urban temperature regulating service, which is a gap in urban heat island (UHI) studies in rapidly urbanizing cities. In order to study the quantitative relationship between landscape metrics (including area index and shape index) and temperature regulating service, this study applied a temperature regulating service in an urban thermal environment study based on the "source-sink" landscape theory in western Shenzhen in different periods. The identification of source and sink landscapes is based on the spatial relationship of unusual surface features derived from Landsat-5 and -8 and the consideration of the temperature difference. We found that the source landscapes at different periods provide temperature regulating services for different distances, which directly lead to the difference between the theoretical service value based on the Alternative Cost Method and the actual service value considering demand, changing in the same trend. The results show that the supply distance of temperature regulating services in 2005, 2010, and 2013 is 150 m, 180 m, and 210 m, respectively. The temperature regulating service value is 3.043, 3.273, and 4.308 billion yuan in 2005, 2010, and 2013, which is lower than the estimation value without considering supply and demand (16.638, 23.728, and 37.495 billion yuan, respectively). The value of the temperature regulating service has a positive correlation with the increase of the patch area index. With the gradual complexity of the shape, the service value increases first and then decreases. Moreover, the landscapes with the smallest shape index and area index have the shortest distance for service supplying. The assessment of the temperature regulating service needs to consider the presence of demand landscapes. Furthermore, the interaction of landscapes under different conditions requires further consideration. The setting of the cooling landscape shape and area for mitigating the "urban heat island" effect can provide references to urban planners and policymakers in the practice of urban climate adaptation and regulation.
C1 [Ma, Ruiming; Zhu, Dehai] China Agr Univ, Coll Land Sci & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.
   [Xie, Miaomiao] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Land Sci & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.
   [Yun, Wenju] Minist Nat Resources, Key Lab Agr Land Qual, Beijing 100035, Peoples R China.
C3 China Agricultural University; China University of Geosciences; Ministry
   of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China
RP Xie, MM (corresponding author), China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Land Sci & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.
EM B20163080543@cau.edu.cn; xiemiaomiao@cugb.edu.cn; yunwenju@lcrc.org.cn;
   zhudehai@cau.edu.cn
RI Ma, Ruiming/ADQ-4756-2022
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41771204]
FX This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China, No.41771204.
CR Akbari H, 2001, SOL ENERGY, V70, P295, DOI 10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00089-X
   Alonso L, 2019, URBAN SCI, V3, DOI 10.3390/urbansci3040101
   Amiri R, 2009, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V113, P2606, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2009.07.021
   [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being: Desertification synthesis
   [Anonymous], 2018, CHILL PROSP PROV SUS
   [Anonymous], 2000, Chin. J. Ecol, DOI DOI 10.13292/J.1000-4890.2000.0008
   Arnfield AJ, 2003, INT J CLIMATOL, V23, P1, DOI 10.1002/joc.859
   Arnold CL, 1996, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V62, P243, DOI 10.1080/01944369608975688
   Azevedo JA, 2016, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/rs8020153
   Bechtel B, 2015, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V7, P2850, DOI 10.3390/rs70302850
   Bokaie M, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V23, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.03.009
   Bolund P, 1999, ECOL ECON, V29, P293, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0
   Bowler DE, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V97, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
   Cao X, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V96, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.03.008
   Carlson T.N., 1994, Remote Sens. Rev, V9, P161, DOI DOI 10.1080/02757259409532220
   Chakraborty SD, 2015, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V148, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.034
   Chang CR, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V80, P386, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.09.005
   [陈爱莲 Chen Ailian], 2012, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V32, P4553
   [陈利顶 Chen Liding], 2003, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V23, P2406
   Chen XL, 2006, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V104, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2005.11.016
   Cheng XY, 2015, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000256
   Costanza R, 2017, ECOSYST SERV, V28, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
   DeBono A., 2004, UN Environment Programme (UNEP) Report, DOI 10.1017/S0147547903000218
   Díaz S, 2015, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V14, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002
   Doick KJ, 2014, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V493, P662, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.048
   Duan SB, 2017, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V195, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2017.04.008
   Farrugia Simon, 2013, International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Management, V9, P136, DOI 10.1080/21513732.2013.782342
   Fernández IC, 2019, ECOL ECON, V161, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.029
   Fu P, 2016, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V175, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.040
   Gaodi X., 2001, Journal of Natural Resources, V16, P47, DOI DOI 10.3321/J.ISSN:1000-3037.2001.01.009
   Goward SN, 2002, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V79, P225, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00275-9
   HARE FK, 1983, GEOGR REV, V73, P242, DOI 10.2307/214663
   Huang GL, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P1753, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.02.006
   Jiménez-Muñoz JC, 2003, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V108, DOI 10.1029/2003JD003480
   Jiménez-Muñoz JC, 2014, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V11, P1840, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2014.2312032
   Khanal S, 2017, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V139, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2017.05.001
   Arias Elizabeth, 2011, Natl Vital Stat Rep, V59, P1
   Kumar D, 2015, ECOTOX ENVIRON SAFE, V121, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.07.004
   [Kumar P. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB)], 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations
   [李斌 Li Bin], 2017, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V36, P585
   Li JX, 2011, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V115, P3249, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.07.008
   Li Li-guang, 2014, 2014 Third International Workshop on Earth Observation and Remote Sensing Applications Proceedings of (EORSA), P62, DOI 10.1109/EORSA.2014.6927850
   Li WF, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V586, P457, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.191
   [林荣平 Lin Rongping], 2017, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V37, P294
   Lingli Wang, 2009, Frontiers of Earth Science in China, V3, P237, DOI 10.1007/s11707-009-0023-7
   Liu H, 2008, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V144, P199, DOI 10.1007/s10661-007-9979-5
   Liu H, 2009, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V75, P291, DOI 10.14358/PERS.75.3.291
   Liu YX, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V180, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.006
   [刘焱序 Liu Yanxu], 2017, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V37, P7769
   [栾庆祖 Luan Qingzu], 2014, [生态环境学报, Ecology and Environmental Sciences], V23, P252
   Lyon JG, 1998, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V64, P143
   Mallick J, 2012, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V19, P348, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2012.06.002
   McFeeters SK, 1996, INT J REMOTE SENS, V17, P1425, DOI 10.1080/01431169608948714
   McPherson E. G., 1997, Urban Ecosystems, V1, P49, DOI 10.1023/A:1014350822458
   Mitchell D, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074006
   OKE TR, 1982, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V108, P1, DOI 10.1002/qj.49710845502
   OKE TR, 1973, ATMOS ENVIRON, V7, P769, DOI 10.1016/0004-6981(73)90140-6
   Parsa VA, 2019, URBAN ECOSYST, V22, P989, DOI 10.1007/s11252-019-00870-w
   Peng J, 2018, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V215, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2018.06.010
   Peng J, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V175, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.008
   Phinn S, 2002, INT J REMOTE SENS, V23, P4131, DOI 10.1080/01431160110114998
   Qian J, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8010016
   Quattrochi DA, 1999, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V14, P577, DOI 10.1023/A:1008168910634
   Rosenfeld A.H., 1996, Policies to reduce heat islands: magnitudes of benefits and incentives to achieve them; at
   ROTH M, 1989, INT J REMOTE SENS, V10, P1699, DOI 10.1080/01431168908904002
   SAILOR DJ, 1995, J APPL METEOROL, V34, P1694, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450-34.7.1694
   Sandholt I, 2002, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V79, P213, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00274-7
   Shen HF, 2016, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V172, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2015.11.005
   Sinha S, 2015, EGYPT J REMOTE SENS, V18, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.09.005
   Sobrino JA, 2004, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V90, P434, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2004.02.003
   Streutker DR, 2002, INT J REMOTE SENS, V23, P2595, DOI 10.1080/01431160110115023
   [苏泳娴 Su Yongxian], 2010, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V30, P4905
   Teskey R, 2015, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V38, P1699, DOI 10.1111/pce.12417
   Tran DX, 2017, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V124, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.01.001
   Turner MG, 2005, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V36, P319, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152614
   United Nations, 2018, 2018 REVISION WORLD
   Wang F, 2015, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V7, P4268, DOI 10.3390/rs70404268
   Ward K, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V569, P527, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.119
   Weng QH, 2004, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V89, P467, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.005
   Weng Qihao, 2007, Urban Ecosystems, V10, P203, DOI 10.1007/s11252-007-0020-0
   Wilson EH, 2002, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V80, P385, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00318-2
   [肖建武 Xiao Jianwu], 2011, [中国农学通报, Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin], V27, P27
   Xie MM, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105992
   [谢苗苗 Xie Miaomiao], 2011, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V30, P35
   [徐涵秋 XU Han-Qiu], 2009, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V29, P2456
   [徐涵秋 Xu Hanqiu], 2005, [遥感学报, Journal of Remote Sensing], V9, P589
   Yu ZW, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V82, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.002
   Yuan F, 2007, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V106, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.003
   Zhang YS, 2009, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V11, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2009.03.001
   Zhou D. Y., 2011, AREAL RES DEV, V30, P73, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1003-2363.2011.03.015
   Zhou WQ, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V102, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.009
NR 91
TC 12
Z9 14
U1 7
U2 78
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2220-9964
J9 ISPRS INT J GEO-INF
JI ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf.
PD MAY
PY 2020
VL 9
IS 5
AR 295
DI 10.3390/ijgi9050295
PG 18
WC Computer Science, Information Systems; Geography, Physical; Remote
   Sensing
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Computer Science; Physical Geography; Remote Sensing
GA LZ3CN
UT WOS:000541105200033
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Seroussi, E
   Rosov, A
   Shirak, A
   Lam, A
   Gootwine, E
AF Seroussi, Eyal
   Rosov, Alexander
   Shirak, Andrey
   Lam, Alon
   Gootwine, Elisha
TI Unveiling genomic regions that underlie differences between Afec-Assaf
   sheep and its parental Awassi breed
SO GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION
LA English
DT Article
ID SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE SUBSTITUTION; SCOTTISH BLACKFACE LAMBS; WIDE
   ASSOCIATION; FAT DISTRIBUTION; BODY-WEIGHT; GASTROINTESTINAL NEMATODES;
   GENOMEWIDE ASSOCIATION; POPULATION-STRUCTURE; SELECTION SIGNALS;
   MILK-PRODUCTION
AB Background: Sheep production in Israel has improved by crossing the fat-tailed local Awassi breed with the East Friesian and later, with the Booroola Merino breed, which led to the formation of the highly prolific Afec-Assaf strain. This strain differs from its parental Awassi breed in morphological traits such as tail and horn size, coat pigmentation and wool characteristics, as well as in production, reproductive and health traits. To identify major genes associated with the formation of the Afec-Assaf strain, we genotyped 41 Awassi and 141 Afec-Assaf sheep using the Illumina Ovine SNP50 BeadChip array, and analyzed the results with PLINK and EMMAX software. The detected variable genomic regions that differed between Awassi and Afec-Assaf sheep (variable genomic regions; VGR) were compared to selection signatures that were reported in 48 published genome-wide association studies in sheep. Because the Afec-Assaf strain, but not the Awassi breed, carries the Booroola mutation, association analysis of BMPR1B used as the test gene was performed to evaluate the ability of this study to identify a VGR that includes such a major gene.
   Results: Of the 20 detected VGR, 12 were novel to this study. A similar to 7-Mb VGR was identified on Ovies aries chromosome OAR6 where the Booroola mutation is located. Similar to other studies, the most significant VGR was detected on OAR10, in a region that contains candidate genes affecting horn type (RXFP2), climate adaptation (ALOX5AP), fiber diameter (KATNAl1), coat pigmentation (FRY) and genes associated with fat distribution. The VGR on OAR2 included BNC2, which is also involved in controlling coat pigmentation in sheep. Six other VGR contained genes that were shown to be involved in coat pigmentation by analyzing their mammalian orthologues. Genes associated with fat distribution in humans, including GRB14 and COBLL1, were located in additional VGR. Sequencing DNA from Awassi and Afec-Assaf individuals revealed non-synonymous mutations in some of these candidate genes.
   Conclusions: Our results highlight VGR that differentiate the Awassi breed from the Afec-Assaf strain, some of which may include genes that confer an advantage to Afec-Assaf and Assaf over Awassi sheep with respect to intensive sheep production under Mediterranean conditions.
C1 [Seroussi, Eyal; Rosov, Alexander; Shirak, Andrey; Lam, Alon; Gootwine, Elisha] ARO, Inst Anim Sci, Volcani Ctr, POB 15159, IL-7528809 Rishon Leziyyon, Israel.
C3 VOLCANI INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
RP Gootwine, E (corresponding author), ARO, Inst Anim Sci, Volcani Ctr, POB 15159, IL-7528809 Rishon Leziyyon, Israel.
EM gootwine@agri.gov.il
CR Aali M, 2014, GENE, V537, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.gene.2013.12.023
   Al-Mamun HA, 2015, GENET SEL EVOL, V47, DOI 10.1186/s12711-015-0142-4
   [Anonymous], [No title captured]
   [Anonymous], DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.DDMEC.2013.05.003)
   Astle W, 2009, STAT SCI, V24, P451, DOI 10.1214/09-STS307
   Atlija M, 2015, GENET SEL EVOL, V48, DOI 10.1186/s12711-016-0182-4
   Bakhtiarizadeh MR, 2013, GENE, V521, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.gene.2013.03.045
   Becker D, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008689
   Bonfield JK, 2010, BIOINFORMATICS, V26, P1699, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq268
   Choi Y, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0046688
   Ciani E, 2014, ANIM GENET, V45, P256, DOI 10.1111/age.12106
   Cristancho AG, 2011, NAT REV MOL CELL BIO, V12, P722, DOI 10.1038/nrm3198
   Demars J, 2013, PLOS GENET, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003482
   Dominik S, 2012, ANIM GENET, V43, P468, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02271.x
   Duroudier NP, 2009, ALLERGY, V64, P823, DOI 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02015.x
   Elbeltagy AR, 2014, P INT PLANT AN GEN 2
   Epstein H., 1985, 57 FAO, V57
   Fariello MI, 2013, GENETICS, V193, P929, DOI 10.1534/genetics.112.147231
   Fariello MI, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0103813
   García-Gámez E, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0047782
   García-Gámez E, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0021158
   Gholizadeh M, 2015, J GENET, V94, P143, DOI 10.1007/s12041-015-0469-1
   Gholizadeh M, 2014, J GENET, V93, P489, DOI 10.1007/s12041-014-0372-1
   Goot H, 1991, P INT WORKSH C INRA, P341
   Goot H, 1991, P INT WORKSH C INRA, P335
   Gootwine E, 2000, ANIM SCI, V71, P607, DOI 10.1017/S1357729800055387
   Gootwine E, 1966, SMALL RUMINANT RES, V20, P255
   Gootwine E, 2008, ANIM REPROD SCI, V108, P402, DOI 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.09.009
   Gootwine E, 2011, TROP ANIM HEALTH PRO, V43, P1289, DOI 10.1007/s11250-011-9852-y
   Gratten J, 2007, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V274, P619, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2006.3762
   Gutiérrez-Gil B, 2015, FRONT GENET, V6, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2015.00167
   Gutiérrez-Gil B, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0094623
   Han JL, 2008, PLOS GENET, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000074
   Hazard D, 2014, BMC GENOMICS, V15, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-778
   Heid IM, 2010, NAT GENET, V42, P949, DOI 10.1038/ng.685
   Johnston SE, 2011, MOL ECOL, V20, P2555, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05076.x
   Kang HM, 2010, NAT GENET, V42, P348, DOI 10.1038/ng.548
   Kemper KE, 2012, GENET RES, V94, P191, DOI 10.1017/S0016672312000365
   Kijas JW, 2013, J ANIM BREED GENET, V130, P468, DOI 10.1111/jbg.12048
   Kijas JW, 2013, ANIM GENET, V44, P325, DOI 10.1111/age.12011
   Kijas JW, 2012, PLOS BIOL, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001258
   Legaz E, 2008, SMALL RUMINANT RES, V80, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.09.001
   Li H, 2010, BIOINFORMATICS, V26, P589, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698
   Li MH, 2014, HEREDITY, V112, P122, DOI 10.1038/hdy.2013.83
   Lu YC, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms10495
   Lühken G, 2016, GENET SEL EVOL, V48, DOI 10.1186/s12711-016-0256-3
   Lv FH, 2014, MOL BIOL EVOL, V31, P3324, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msu264
   Matika O, 2016, GENET SEL EVOL, V48, DOI 10.1186/s12711-016-0191-3
   Mcrae KM, 2014, BMC GENOMICS, V15, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-637
   Mömke S, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0018943
   Moioli B, 2015, J ANIM SCI, V93, P4660, DOI 10.2527/jas.2015-9389
   Moioli B, 2016, ANIM PROD SCI, V56, P1046, DOI 10.1071/AN14826
   Moioli B, 2013, BMC GENET, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2156-14-76
   Moradi MH, 2012, BMC GENET, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2156-13-10
   Mucha S, 2015, GENET SEL EVOL, V47, DOI 10.1186/s12711-015-0119-3
   Mulsant P, 2001, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V98, P5104, DOI 10.1073/pnas.091577598
   Norris BJ, 2008, GENOME RES, V18, P1282, DOI 10.1101/gr.072090.107
   Pickering NK, 2015, BMC GENOMICS, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-2148-2
   Pollott GE, 2004, J DAIRY SCI, V87, P3690, DOI 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73508-0
   Purcell S, 2007, AM J HUM GENET, V81, P559, DOI 10.1086/519795
   Raadsma HW, 2013, ANIM GENET, V44, P547, DOI 10.1111/age.12033
   Randhawa IAS, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0153013
   Randhawa IAS, 2014, BMC GENET, V15, DOI 10.1186/1471-2156-15-34
   Ren X, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep21111
   Riggio V, 2014, J ANIM BREED GENET, V131, P426, DOI 10.1111/jbg.12071
   Riggio V, 2013, HEREDITY, V110, P420, DOI 10.1038/hdy.2012.90
   Ro M, 2012, SCAND J IMMUNOL, V76, P151, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2012.02712.x
   Rowe S., 2014, P 10 WORLD C GEN APP
   Rupp R, 2015, PLOS GENET, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005629
   Schleinitz D, 2014, DIABETOLOGIA, V57, P1276, DOI 10.1007/s00125-014-3214-z
   Shariflou MR, 2013, ANIM GENET, V44, P231, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2012.02392.x
   Shimshony A, 1983, Rev Sci Tech, V2, P467, DOI 10.20506/rst.2.2.123
   Shungin D, 2015, NATURE, V518, P187, DOI 10.1038/nature14132
   Souza CJH, 2001, J ENDOCRINOL, V169, pR1, DOI 10.1677/joe.0.169R001
   Sturm RA, 2009, HUM MOL GENET, V18, pR9, DOI 10.1093/hmg/ddp003
   Suárez-Vega A, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0126416
   Sulem P, 2007, NAT GENET, V39, P1443, DOI 10.1038/ng.2007.13
   Wang HH, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0128688
   Wang XL, 2014, GENE, V549, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.gene.2014.07.072
   Wang ZP, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0107101
   Wei CH, 2015, BMC GENOMICS, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1384-9
   White SN, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0047829
   Wiedemar N, 2015, ANIM GENET, V46, P457, DOI 10.1111/age.12309
   Wilson T, 2001, BIOL REPROD, V64, P1225, DOI 10.1095/biolreprod64.4.1225
   Yang GL, 2013, SCI WORLD J, DOI 10.1155/2013/675382
   Zhang L, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0066569
   Zhang LF, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0065942
   Zhao X, 2012, ANIM GENET, V43, P9, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02304.x
   Zhao X, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0021739
   Zhu CY, 2015, INT J MOL SCI, V16, P20360, DOI 10.3390/ijms160920360
NR 90
TC 18
Z9 21
U1 0
U2 9
PU BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
PI LONDON
PA 236 GRAYS INN RD, FLOOR 6, LONDON WC1X 8HL, ENGLAND
SN 0999-193X
EI 1297-9686
J9 GENET SEL EVOL
JI Genet. Sel. Evol.
PD FEB 10
PY 2017
VL 49
AR 19
DI 10.1186/s12711-017-0296-3
PG 10
WC Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science; Genetics & Heredity
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Genetics & Heredity
GA EL6FM
UT WOS:000394715800001
PM 28187715
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Huang, HL
   Band, SS
   Karami, H
   Ehteram, M
   Chau, KW
   Zhang, Q
AF Huang, Hailong
   Band, Shahab S.
   Karami, Hojat
   Ehteram, Mohammad
   Chau, Kwok-wing
   Zhang, Qian
TI Solar radiation prediction using improved soft computing models for
   semi-arid, slightly-arid and humid climates
SO ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Solar radiation; Grasshopper optimization algorithm; Semi-dry climate;
   Dry climate
ID PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; SUPPORT VECTOR
   MACHINE; OPTIMAL-DESIGN; GA ALGORITHM; ANN; REGRESSION; DIFFUSE;
   PARAMETERS; SYSTEM
AB In this research, monthly solar radiation is predicted in semi-dry, dry, and wet climates. Adaptive neurofuzzy interface system (ANFIS), radial basis function neural network (RBFNN), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) models are used for predicting solar radiation (SR). Grasshopper algorithm (GOA) is utilized to improve the performance of ANFIS, RBFNN, and MLP models. Three stations in Iran, namely Rasht (humid climate), Yazd (semi-arid) and Tehran (slightly arid), are considered as the case studies. The accuracy of GOA is benchmarked against particle swarm optimization (PSO) and salp swarm algorithm (SSA). The results reveal that the best-input combination is relative humidity, wind speed, rainfall, and temperature at these three stations. A comprehensive study is performed to select the best-input combination. The main contribution of paper is to create new hybrid ANFIS models for predicting monthly solar radiation in different climates. Besides, effects of different parameters are comprehensively investigated on solar radiation. This study indicates that temperature is the most effective parameter for estimating SR in dry and semi-dry climate. It is found that rainfall plays a key role for estimating SR in a wet region. The main finding of this paper is that the determination of the most suitable input scenario for predicting SR is an important issue because different input scenarios in different climates provide different performances. Besides, the use of a robust optimization algorithm as a training method is a significant step of the modeling process of SR. Results indicate that mean absolute error (MAE) of ANFIS-GOA is 3.8% and 8.9% less in comparison with that of MLP-GOA and RBFNN-GOA, respectively during the training stage at Yazd station. Besides, MAE of ANFIS-GOA is 26% and 31% less than that of MLP-GOA and RBFNN-GOA, respectively during the training stage at Tehran station. Results indicate that NSE values of ANFIS-GOA, ANFIS-SSA, ANFIS-PSO, and ANFIS models are 0.94, 0.88, 0.84, and 0.79, respectively during the testing stage at Rasht station. It is found that ANFIS-GOA attains higher accuracy in predicting SR under different climates.(c) 2022 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
C1 [Huang, Hailong] Wenzhou Univ, Coll Comp Sci & Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Band, Shahab S.] Natl Yunlin Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Future, Future Technol Res Ctr, 123 Univ Rd,Sect 3, Touliu 64002, Yunlin, Taiwan.
   [Karami, Hojat; Ehteram, Mohammad] Semnan Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Water Engn & Hydraul Struct, Semnan, Iran.
   [Chau, Kwok-wing] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hung Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Qian] Wenzhou Univ Technol, Sch Data Sci & Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou 325035, Peoples R China.
C3 Wenzhou University; National Yunlin University Science & Technology;
   Semnan University; Hong Kong Polytechnic University; Wenzhou University
   of Technology
RP Band, SS (corresponding author), Natl Yunlin Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Future, Future Technol Res Ctr, 123 Univ Rd,Sect 3, Touliu 64002, Yunlin, Taiwan.; Karami, H (corresponding author), Semnan Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Water Engn & Hydraul Struct, Semnan, Iran.; Zhang, Q (corresponding author), Wenzhou Univ Technol, Sch Data Sci & Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou 325035, Peoples R China.
EM hhl@wzu.edu.cn; shamshirbands@yuntech.edu.tw; hkarami@semnan.ac.ir;
   mohamm-dehteram@semnan.ac.ir; dr.kwok-wing.chau@polyu.edu.hk;
   20200420@wzu.edu.cn
RI Chau, Kwok-wing/E-5235-2011; Karami, Hojat/AAU-1618-2020; S. Band,
   Shahab/ABB-2469-2020
OI Karami, Hojat/0000-0002-2017-7204; S. Band, Shahab/0000-0001-6109-1311
FU Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY19F020035]
FX This research was supported by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science
   Foundation of China under Grant No. LY19F020035.
CR Abbassi R, 2019, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V179, P362, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.10.069
   Abd Elaziz M, 2020, APPL MATH MODEL, V80, P929, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2019.10.069
   Ahmed Emad A., 2013, Journal of Clean Energy Technologies, V1, P148, DOI 10.7763/JOCET.2013.V1.35
   Alizamir M, 2020, ENERGY, V197, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117239
   Aljarah I, 2018, COGN COMPUT, V10, P478, DOI 10.1007/s12559-017-9542-9
   Alsina EF, 2016, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V120, P320, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.101
   Antonopoulos VZ, 2019, COMPUT ELECTRON AGR, V160, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.compag.2019.03.022
   Bukar AL, 2020, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V221, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113161
   Celik Ö, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V116, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.082
   Chen JL, 2013, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V75, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.06.034
   Chen JL, 2011, RENEW ENERG, V36, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2010.06.024
   Dursun OF, 2012, J HYDROL, V426, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.010
   Eberhart R., 1995, MHS 95 P 6 INT S MIC
   Ehteram M, 2021, ENERGY REP, V7, P6308, DOI 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.09.079
   Ehteram M, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P10675, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-16301-3
   Elazab OS, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10.3390/en13020497
   Fan JL, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V145, P2034, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.104
   Fan JL, 2019, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V100, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.018
   Fernandes FE Jr, 2019, SWARM EVOL COMPUT, V49, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.swevo.2019.05.010
   Garg H, 2019, INFORM SCIENCES, V478, P499, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2018.11.041
   Garg H, 2016, APPL MATH COMPUT, V274, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.amc.2015.11.001
   Garg H, 2015, ADV COMPU INTELL ROB, P620, DOI 10.4018/978-1-4666-7258-1.ch020
   Ghimire S, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V216, P288, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.158
   He HQ, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11111271
   Huang LX, 2021, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3389/feart.2021.596860
   Ibrahim RA, 2019, J AMB INTEL HUM COMP, V10, P3155, DOI 10.1007/s12652-018-1031-9
   Jahani B, 2019, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V137, P1257, DOI 10.1007/s00704-018-2666-3
   Khosravi A, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V194, P342, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.147
   Kisi O, 2014, ENERGY, V64, P429, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.009
   Kumar R., 2013, ADV ENERG ENG, V1, P66
   Kumar R, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V52, P1294, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.021
   Kundu T, 2022, INT J INTELL SYST, V37, P3900, DOI 10.1002/int.22707
   Lee JH, 2018, IEEE T IND ELECTRON, V65, P1791, DOI 10.1109/TIE.2017.2760838
   Liu YF, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V146, P1101, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.053
   Meenal R, 2018, RENEW ENERG, V121, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.005
   Mellit A, 2008, RENEW ENERG, V33, P1570, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2007.08.006
   Mirjalili SZ, 2018, APPL INTELL, V48, P805, DOI 10.1007/s10489-017-1019-8
   Mohammadi B, 2020, ARAB J GEOSCI, V13, DOI 10.1007/s12517-020-05355-1
   Mohammadi K, 2015, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V93, P406, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.01.021
   Naderloo L, 2020, J EARTH SYST SCI, V129, DOI 10.1007/s12040-020-01414-z
   Niu WJ, 2018, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V70, P562, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.06.011
   Ozoegwu CG, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V216, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.096
   Panahi F, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108285
   Panahi F, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V329, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129721
   Panda N, 2020, ARAB J SCI ENG, V45, P2743, DOI 10.1007/s13369-019-04132-x
   Pang ZH, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V156, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.042
   Pellicone G, 2019, J MAPS, V15, P788, DOI 10.1080/17445647.2019.1673840
   Quej VH, 2017, J ATMOS SOL-TERR PHY, V155, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.jastp.2017.02.002
   Ramedani Z, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V39, P1005, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.108
   Rao KDVSK, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V91, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.096
   Rehman S, 2012, ENERG SOURCE PART A, V34, P1326, DOI 10.1080/15567031003792403
   Saremi S, 2017, ADV ENG SOFTW, V105, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.01.004
   Senkal O, 2015, METEOROL ATMOS PHYS, V127, P481, DOI 10.1007/s00703-015-0372-6
   Sözen A, 2008, EXPERT SYST APPL, V35, P1533, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.080
   Talaat M, 2020, ENERGY, V190, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116423
   Yadav AK, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V52, P1093, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.156
   Yildiz BS, 2022, ENG COMPUT-GERMANY, V38, P4207, DOI 10.1007/s00366-021-01368-w
   Yildiz BS, 2021, EXPERT SYST, V38, DOI 10.1111/exsy.12666
   Zhang HR, 2017, OCEAN ENG, V141, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.06.023
NR 59
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 1
U2 10
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1110-0168
EI 2090-2670
J9 ALEX ENG J
JI Alex. Eng. J.
PD DEC
PY 2022
VL 61
IS 12
BP 10631
EP 10657
DI 10.1016/j.aej.2022.03.078
EA APR 2022
PG 27
WC Engineering, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering
GA 1P4NT
UT WOS:000801988100010
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU van Lanen, RJ
   van Beek, R
   Kosian, MC
AF van Lanen, Rowin J.
   van Beek, Roy
   Kosian, Menne C.
TI A different view on (world) heritage. The need for multi-perspective
   data analyses in historical landscape studies: The example of Schokland
   (NL)
SO JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
LA English
DT Article
DE World heritage; Historical landscapes; Heritage management and
   conservation; Historical geographical information systems (hgis);
   Landscape archaeology; Multi-perspective data integration
AB The awareness that cultural heritage plays an influential role in shared identities and in both spatial and environmental development has significantly increased in recent years. International collaboration and treaties, such as the 'FARO-convention' in 2005 emphasize the importance of heritage in relation to aspects of human rights and demography. Furthermore, it is becoming increasingly clear that historical perspectives are essential for making well-informed choices regarding environmental challenges (e.g. spatial planning, sustainable development, climate adaptation). This increased awareness not only emphasizes the importance of cultural heritage for present-day challenges, but equally presents a new set of conditions and standards, and requires the development of new methodologies. Besides conservation, more than ever there is a need for cultural heritage to become contextualized and sustainably accessible. The organisational pinnacle of cultural-heritage conservation is world heritage: sites that are judged to contain a set of cultural and/or natural values which are of outstanding value to humanity. However, to what extent world heritage meets these newly set criteria is unknown. Nevertheless, these sites often reflect an eminent status, scientifically as well as economically (i.e. through tourism). Consequently, world heritage often enjoys interest from multiple stakeholders including governmental, scientific, public, and commercial parties, all of whom engage in contrasting activities and have different interests and needs. As a result the need for accessibility and integrated overviews of these sites is high but equally challenging. In this paper we will focus on the world-heritage site of Schokland (NL). This former island in the Dutch Zuiderzee both reflects outstanding historical and archaeological importance. We will show that the dynamics surrounding this site require tailormade conservation methodologies, which greatly depend on data integration. We present a new Historical Geographical Information System (HGIS) specifically designed to integrate cultural and geoscientific data and facilitate dynamic heritage management. Results show that such a system greatly adds to the contextualization and (digital) accessibility of the heritage site and is essential for substantiating conservation methodologies. Furthermore, it shows great research potential for diachronological reconstructions of dynamic-lowland development. The system facilitates multidisciplinary scientific analyses, integrated monitoring, and public outreach and shows great application potential for other (world-)heritage sites. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
C1 [van Lanen, Rowin J.; van Beek, Roy] Wageningen Univ & Res, Dept Environm Sci, Wageningen, Netherlands.
   [van Lanen, Rowin J.; Kosian, Menne C.] Cultural Heritage Agcy Netherlands, POB 1600, NL-3800 BP Amersfoort, Netherlands.
C3 Wageningen University & Research
RP van Lanen, RJ (corresponding author), Wageningen Univ & Res, Dept Environm Sci, Wageningen, Netherlands.; van Lanen, RJ (corresponding author), Cultural Heritage Agcy Netherlands, POB 1600, NL-3800 BP Amersfoort, Netherlands.
EM r.van.lanen@cultureelerfgoed.nl
RI van Beek, Roy/LKM-8700-2024
OI Kosian, Menne/0000-0002-0861-589X; van Lanen, Rowin/0000-0002-2882-1973;
   van Beek, Roy/0000-0002-0726-6974
CR [Anonymous], 2004, NATL LIDAR SURVEY DA
   [Anonymous], 1762, KAART EILAND SCHOKLA, P1762
   [Anonymous], 2019, NATL LIDAR SURVEY DA
   [Anonymous], 1992, DIG HOOGT HAND NAUWK
   [Anonymous], 2012, NATL LIDAR SURVEY DA
   [Anonymous], 2014, BAS REG ADDR BUILD B
   [Anonymous], 2010, TOP10NL BAS TOP BRT
   Baas H.G., 2001, Ontgonnen verleden. Inzoomen op de historisch-geografische ontwikkeling van het Nederlandse landschap
   Bloemers T, 2010, CULTURAL LANDSCAPE & HERITAGE PARADOX: PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE DUTCH ARCHAEOLOGICAL-HISTORICAL LANDSCAPE AND ITS EUROPEAN DIMENSION, P1, DOI 10.5117/9789089641557
   Bodenhamer DavidJ., 2015, Deep Maps and Spatial Narratives
   Buisman J., 1995, Duizend jaar weer, wind en water in de Lage Landen; deel 1, tot 1300
   Collection plans of the Netherlands' Cadastre Land Registry and Mapping Agency (Kadaster), 1822, AANTEKENINGEN WIJLEN
   De Boer G., 2014, ZUIDELIJK RIVIERDUIN
   Duckham M., 2004, Foundations of geographic information science
   Earley-Spadoni T, 2017, J ARCHAEOL SCI, V84, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.003
   Ell P.S., 2001, History and Computing, V13, P1
   Fairclough G., 2002, 2 EAC
   Fairclough G, 2010, CULTURAL LANDSCAPE & HERITAGE PARADOX: PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE DUTCH ARCHAEOLOGICAL-HISTORICAL LANDSCAPE AND ITS EUROPEAN DIMENSION, P653
   FAIRCLOUGH Graham., 2008, The Heritage Reader, P297
   Geurts A.J., 2002, SCHOKLAND HIST WEERB
   Geurts A.J., 1997, GROENE IJSSELMEERPOL
   Goodchild MF, 2010, J SPAT INT SCI, P3, DOI 10.5311/JOSIS.2010.1.2
   Goodchild MF, 2009, PROCED EARTH PLAN SC, V1, P1037, DOI 10.1016/j.proeps.2009.09.160
   Gotje W., 2014, Catalogus van geologische kaarten van de Noordoostpolder
   Gregory IN, 2007, PROG HUM GEOG, V31, P638, DOI 10.1177/0309132507081495
   Haartsen A., 2010, ONTGONNEN VERLEDEN L
   Haartsen A., 2009, 2006DK116E DK DIR KE
   Holtorf Cornelius., 2007, European Journal of Archaeology, V10, P149, DOI DOI 10.1177/1461957108095982
   Huisman D., 2013, ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERIT
   Ickerodt U, 2010, CULTURAL LANDSCAPE & HERITAGE PARADOX: PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE DUTCH ARCHAEOLOGICAL-HISTORICAL LANDSCAPE AND ITS EUROPEAN DIMENSION, P351
   ICOMOS, 1995, 739 ICOMOS
   Janssen J, 2017, EUR PLAN STUD, V25, P1654, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2017.1329410
   Knowles A.K., 2005, Historical Geography, Geoscience Publication, V33, P7
   Kristiansen K., 2014, CURRENT SWEDISH ARCH, V22, P11, DOI [DOI 10.37718/CSA.2014.01, 10.37718/CSA.2014.01]
   Lanen Rowin J. Van, 2020, Water History, V12, P151, DOI 10.1007/s12685-020-00251-7
   Minute plans of the Netherlands' Cadastre Land Registry and Mapping Agency (Kadaster), 1832, CAD MAP 1811 1832 MI
   Molenaar S., 2000, 625 RAAP
   Pocobelli DP, 2018, HERIT SCI, V6, DOI 10.1186/s40494-018-0191-4
   Reinders H.R., 1980, 50 JAAR ONDERZOEK DO
   Renes J., 2019, TIJDSCHRIFT HIST GEO, V4, P168
   Ridge M, 2013, INT J HUMANIT ARTS C, V7, P176, DOI 10.3366/ijhac.2013.0088
   Rijksinstituut voor NatuurbeheerNatuur En Landschap Van Schokland, 1989, BOUWST EEN GEINT BEH
   Roorda I.M., 1992, SITES MONUMENTS NATL, P117
   Schepers M, 2021, MARIT STUD, V20, P235, DOI 10.1007/s40152-021-00215-4
   sGroten C., 1588, ORBIS TERRESTRIS TAM
   Ten Anscher T., 2018, RAPPORT
   Ten Anscher T.J., 2013, RAPPORT
   Ten Anscher T.J., 2012, THESIS U AMSTERDAM A
   UNESCO, 2019, OP GUID IMPL WORLD H
   van den Biggelaar DFAM, 2019, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V44, P886, DOI 10.1002/esp.4542
   van den Biggelaar DFAM, 2014, NETH J GEOSCI, V93, P175, DOI 10.1017/njg.2014.14
   Van den Biggelaar D.F.A.M, 2017, NEW LAND OLD HIST LA
   van den Biggelaar Don F A M, 2015, Water Hist, V7, P533
   Van Deventer J., 1558, HOLLANDT
   Van Heeringen R.M., 2004, A pilot study on the monitoring of the physical quality of three archaeological sites on the UNESCO Monument of Schokland, province of Flevoland, the Netherlands
   Van Hezel G., 2008, SCHOKLAND OMGEVING
   Van Lanen R.J., NETHERLANDS J GEOSCI, V99, pe14, DOI [10.1017/njg.2020.12, DOI 10.1017/NJG.2020.12]
   Van Lanen R.J., 2017, UTRECHT STUDIES EART, V137
   Van Lier L., 2015, SCHOKLAND BEHEERPLAN
   Van Oorsouw M.F., 1998, JAARVERSLAG RIJKSDIE
   Van Popta Y., 2013, PALEO AKTUEEL, V24, P91
   Van Popta Y., 2020, THESIS U GRONINGEN G, DOI [10.33612/diss.135931299, DOI 10.33612/DISS.135931299]
   Van Popta Y., 2016, WIERHUIZEN ACHLUM HO, P129
   Vecco M, 2010, J CULT HERIT, V11, P321, DOI 10.1016/j.culher.2010.01.006
   Velthuizen D., 2014, BODEMKUNDIG ONDERZOE
   von Lunen Alexander., 2012, History and GIS: Epistemologies, considerations and reflections, V1
   Vos P., 2018, LANDSCHAP BEWONING V
   Vos P.C., 2015, THESIS UTRECHT U BAR
   Westrik C., 2019, TIJDSCHRIFT HIST GEO, V4, P139
   Wiemer R., 2002, MAPPING FUTURE MANAG, P103
   Wiggers A.J., 1955, WORDING NOORDOOSTPOL
   World-heritage contour UNESCO site Schokland, 1995, WORLD HER LIST
NR 72
TC 17
Z9 17
U1 15
U2 46
PU ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
PI ISSY-LES-MOULINEAUX
PA 65 RUE CAMILLE DESMOULINS, CS50083, 92442 ISSY-LES-MOULINEAUX, FRANCE
SN 1296-2074
EI 1778-3674
J9 J CULT HERIT
JI J. Cult. Herit.
PD JAN-FEB
PY 2022
VL 53
BP 190
EP 205
DI 10.1016/j.culher.2021.11.011
PG 16
WC Archaeology; Art; Chemistry, Analytical; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary;
   Materials Science, Multidisciplinary; Spectroscopy
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Arts &amp; Humanities Citation Index (A&amp;HCI)
SC Archaeology; Art; Chemistry; Geology; Materials Science; Spectroscopy
GA ZE0LW
UT WOS:000758584800006
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Davila, F
   Bourke, RM
   McWilliam, A
   Crimp, S
   Robins, L
   van Wensveen, M
   Alders, RG
   Butler, JRA
AF Davila, Federico
   Bourke, R. M.
   McWilliam, Andrew
   Crimp, Steven
   Robins, Lisa
   van Wensveen, Monica
   Alders, Robyn G.
   Butler, James R. A.
TI COVID-19 and food systems in Pacific Island Countries, Papua New Guinea,
   and Timor-Leste: Opportunities for actions towards the sustainable
   development goals
SO AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Food systems; COVID-19; Pacific Island Countries; Papua New Guinea;
   Timor-Leste; Sustainable development goals
ID SECURITY; HEALTH; AGRICULTURE
AB Context: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted global food systems. This has led to different strategies by communities, governments, and businesses involved in food systems to mitigate and adapt to the unfolding pandemic. Small Island Developing States are particularly exposed to the conflation of risks from COVID-19 disease, economic downturns, underlying climate vulnerabilities and biosecurity risks.
   Objective: Our study aimed to identify the food systems vulnerabilities, impacts, and opportunities for supporting resilience and sustainable development in selected Pacific Island countries, Papua New Guinea, and Timor-Leste. The study focused on the impacts from the first six months of the pandemic (February-July 2020), with remote data collection and analysis done between May and July 2020.
   Methods: We conducted 67 interviews, and triangulated information with desktop and news sources emerging at the time. We present results on the effect on smallholder livelihoods, supply chains, governance, communities and employment. Overall, the major impacts of COVID-19 have been on economies, posing risks to future food security and further hampering progress towards key Sustainable Development Goals.
   Results and conclusions: We found that unemployment and economic contraction have been the most severe effects to date, with long-term consequences for food value chains and smallholder farmers. Disruptions to tourism, labour migration, and remittances have led to varying socio-economic impacts throughout the region. Vulnerable groups, notably women, urban poor, and youth, have been disproportionately affected by unemployment. TimorLeste has had some social protection measures, whereas in Pacific Countries these have been varied. The lockdowns and State of Emergency initially influenced the distribution and marketing of food, but local food economies are starting to stabilise. The continued functioning of international food supply chains reduced the risk of food insecurity in high import dependent nations, notably import dependent countries like Tuvalu and Kiribati.
   Significance: The results have significance for three recovery pathways. The first recovery pathway relates to revisiting value chains in light of restricted travel. The second recovery pathway exists through leveraging the adaptive capacities of communities to stimulate innovative agriculture that also integrates climate adaptation and nutrition. The third recovery pathway relates to addressing the structural challenges that perpetuate inequalities and poverty while finding new ways of implementing inclusive policies and research. Our study
C1 [Davila, Federico] Univ Technol, Inst Sustainable Futures, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
   [Bourke, R. M.] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Asia & Pacific, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
   [McWilliam, Andrew] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Social Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
   [Crimp, Steven] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Climate Change Inst, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
   [Robins, Lisa] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
   [van Wensveen, Monica] CSIRO Agr & Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
   [Alders, Robyn G.] Australian Natl Univ, Dev Policy Ctr, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
   [Butler, James R. A.] CSIRO Land & Water, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
C3 University of Technology Sydney; Australian National University; Western
   Sydney University; Australian National University; Australian National
   University; Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation
   (CSIRO); Agriculture & Food; Australian National University;
   Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)
RP Davila, F (corresponding author), Univ Technol, Inst Sustainable Futures, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
EM federico.davila@uts.edu.au; mike.bourke@anu.edu.au;
   A.McWilliam@westernsydney.edu.au; Steven.Crimp@anu.edu.au;
   lisa.robins@anu.edu.au; Monica.Vanwensveen@csiro.au;
   Robyn.Alders@anu.edu.au; James.butler@csiro.au
RI Butler, James/D-7446-2011; Alders, Robyn/LYO-7734-2024; Crimp,
   Steven/D-6995-2011
OI Butler, James/0000-0001-8333-947X; Davila, Federico/0000-0002-6899-1854;
   Robins, Lisa/0000-0003-3838-9536; Alders, Robyn G./0000-0002-6947-2837
FU Australian Government through the Australian Centre for International
   Agricultural Research project [CS/2020/146]
FX We extend our gratitude to the extensive list of contributors and key
   informants who provided valuable material and insights throughout this
   work. We would also like the extended Project Reference Committee, peer
   reviewers, and ACIAR staff, who all provided guidance throughout the
   project. Data Supporting Table 1 was compiled by Alex van der Meer Simo.
   This project was supported by the Australian Government through the
   Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research project
   CS/2020/146.
CR Akter S, 2017, FOOD POLICY, V69, P270, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.05.003
   Allen B, 2009, FOOD AND AGRICULTURE IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA, P27
   [Anonymous], 2018, Asia and the Pacific Regional Overview of Food Security and Nutrition 2018 Accelerating progress towards the SDGs
   [Anonymous], 2020, Genevera, P1
   [Anonymous], 2000, 2000 WORLD CENS AGR
   [Anonymous], 2015, NEW SONG COAST FISH
   [Anonymous], 2020, GLOB NUTR REP
   Barnes TS, 2020, ONE HEALTH-AMSTERDAM, V10, DOI 10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100151
   Barnett J, 2011, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V11, pS229, DOI 10.1007/s10113-010-0160-2
   Béné C, 2020, FOOD SECUR, V12, P805, DOI 10.1007/s12571-020-01076-1
   Bourke R.M., 2021, 90 AUSTR NATL U CRAW
   Bourke Richard Michael, 2004, Estimates of Food Crop Production in Papua New Guinea
   Bourke RM, 2009, FOOD AND AGRICULTURE IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA, P1
   Butler JRA, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V117, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.011
   Butler JRA, 2020, FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S, V4, DOI 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00043
   Campbell BM, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V34, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.06.005
   Campbell J. R., 2020, Food Security in Small Island States, P39, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-8256-7_3
   CARE, 2020, RAP GEND ANAL COVID
   Charlton KE, 2016, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-2953-9
   Clapp J, 2020, J PEASANT STUD, V47, P1393, DOI 10.1080/03066150.2020.1823838
   Clissold R, 2020, GEOFORUM, V113, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.05.003
   Connell J., 2020, FOOD SECURITY SMALL
   Cosijn M., CS2020146 ACIAR
   Crowl L., 1994, SCI PACIFIC ISLAND P
   da Costa MD, 2013, FOOD SECUR, V5, P83, DOI 10.1007/s12571-012-0228-6
   Doan D., 2020, Pacific Labour Mobility, Migration and Remittances in Times of COVID-19: Interim Report
   Dressler WH, 2017, AMBIO, V46, P291, DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0836-z
   Edwards RB, 2020, WORLD DEV, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105072
   Eriksson H., 2020, CHANGES ADAPTATIONS
   Euromonitor International, 2020, FOOD NUTR LIGHT COVI
   FAO, 2020, PAC ISL TROP CYCL HA
   FAO, 2020, IMP COVID 19 FOOD SY
   FAO, 2020, FAOSTAT COUNTRY PRO
   FAO, 2020, PAP NEW GUIN FOOD SE
   Farrell P, 2020, FOOD SECUR, V12, P783, DOI 10.1007/s12571-020-01087-y
   FSIN and Global Network Against Food Crises, 2020, GLOB REP FOOD CRIS 2
   Government of Samoa, 2016, AGR SECT PLAN 2016 2
   Government of Solomon Islands, 2015, AGR LIV SECT POL
   Government of Timor-Leste, 2011, TIM LEST STR DRV PLA
   Government of Tuvalu, 2016, TUV NATL AGR SECT PL
   Government of Vanuatu, 2020, VAN AGR SECT POL
   Grundy J, 2014, HEALTH POLICY PLANN, V29, P873, DOI 10.1093/heapol/czt068
   Herrero M, 2017, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V1, pE33, DOI [10.1016/s2542-5196(17)30007-4, 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30007-4]
   Howes S., 2020, PACIFIC REMITTANCES
   Hoy, 2020, POVERTY PANDEMIC PAC
   Hughes RG, 2005, ASIA PAC J CLIN NUTR, V14, P298
   Hunter D, 2013, ISS AGRIC DIVERS, P1
   Ickowitz A, 2019, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V20, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2018.11.002
   ILO, 2016, STRUCTURAL TRANSFORM
   Inamara A., 2020, SUSTAINING FRESH FOO
   Kabuni M., 2020, IMPACT COVID 19 LIVE
   Lasco RD, 2014, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V5, P825, DOI 10.1002/wcc.301
   Lawless S, 2019, MARIT STUD, V18, P347, DOI 10.1007/s40152-019-00147-0
   Leach M, 2021, WORLD DEV, V138, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105233
   MDF, 2020, COVID 19 FOOD SEC MD
   PIFON, 2020, COVID 19 OVERV EXP I
   Plan International, 2020, WE MATT ADDR COVID 1
   Quisumbing A.R., 2014, Gender in Agriculture: Closing the Knowledge Gap
   Rampa, 1 HLTH GLOBAL HUNGER
   Reardon T., 2020, COVID 19 GLOBAL FOOD
   Refugees International, 2020, NEW VULN COVID 19 TR
   Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 2020, Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Purchasing of Critical Supplies: Roots and Measures to Mitigate "Panic Buying
   Robins, 2020, COVID 19 FOOD SYSTEM, P96
   Robins, 2020, COVID 19 FOOD SYSTEM, P96
   Robins L, 2020, ACIAR Technical Report 96, V96, P254
   Robins L., 2020, COVID 19 FOOD SYSTEM
   Robins L., 2020, COVID 19 FOOD SYSTEM
   Savary S, 2020, FOOD SECUR, V12, P695, DOI 10.1007/s12571-020-01093-0
   Scandurra G, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V84, P382, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.016
   Scoones I., 2020, The Politics of Uncertainty: Challenges of Transformation
   Shah S, 2018, ENVIRON DEV, V28, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2018.11.001
   Sharp T., 2013, ENGAGING CAPITALISM
   Shukla P.R., 2019, Special Report on climate change and land
   Smith D, 2019, ONE HEALTH-AMSTERDAM, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.onehlt.2019.100109
   SPC, 2021, PAC COMM TRANS PLAN
   SPC, 2014, PAC YOUTH DEV FRAM 2
   Stafford-Smith Mark, 2017, Sustain Sci, V12, P911, DOI 10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3
   Steenbergen DJ, 2020, MAR POLICY, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104199
   UNDP, 2020, ASS COVID 19 TIM LES
   UNDP, 2018, TIM LEST NATL HUM DE
   UNICEF, 2018, QUAL ED REAL RIGHTS
   United Nationa, 2011, SMALL ISL DEV STAT S
   University of Cambridge, 2020, COVID 19 BUS RISK
   van Dieen J, 2020, J APPL BIOMECH, V36, P369, DOI 10.1123/jab.2020-0250
   Wairiu M., 2020, ASSESSING NUTR SOCIO
   Wale J., 2020, COVID 19 IMPACT FISH
   Webb, 2020, COVID 19 FOOD SYSTEM, P96
   WFP, 2020, MACR ANAL COVID 19 T
   Wilson, 2020, DEMANING FUTURE NAVI
   World Bank, WORLD BANK DAT HLTH
   World Bank 2020a, TIM LEST EC REP APR
   World Health Organization, WHO COR DIS DASHB
   World Health Organization, 23 WHO
   World Vision International, 2020, OUT TIME COVID 19 AF
NR 94
TC 38
Z9 38
U1 4
U2 71
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0308-521X
EI 1873-2267
J9 AGR SYST
JI Agric. Syst.
PD JUN
PY 2021
VL 191
AR 103137
DI 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103137
EA APR 2021
PG 11
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Agriculture
GA SO9TW
UT WOS:000659317600014
PM 36570634
OA hybrid, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Cai, XT
   Riley, WJ
   Zhu, Q
   Tang, JY
   Zeng, ZZ
   Bisht, G
   Randerson, JT
AF Cai, Xitian
   Riley, William J.
   Zhu, Qing
   Tang, Jinyun
   Zeng, Zhenzhong
   Bisht, Gautam
   Randerson, James T.
TI Improving Representation of Deforestation Effects on Evapotranspiration
   in the E3SM Land Model
SO JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
ID GRASSLAND ENERGY-EXCHANGE; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; TEMPERATURE RESPONSE;
   PAIRED CATCHMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FOREST; IMPACT; FLUXNET; COVER; SCALE
AB Evapotranspiration (ET) plays an important role in land-atmosphere coupling of energy, water, and carbon cycles. Following deforestation, ET is typically observed to decrease substantially as a consequence of decreases in leaf area and roots and increases in runoff. Changes in ET (latent heat flux) revise the surface energy and water budgets, which further affects large-scale atmospheric dynamics and feeds back positively or negatively to long-term forest sustainability. In this study, we used observations from a recent synthesis of 29 pairs of adjacent intact and deforested FLUXNET sites to improve model parameterization of stomatal characteristics, photosynthesis, and soil water dynamics in version 1 of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) Land Model (ELMv1). We found that default ELMv1 predicts an increase in ET after deforestation, likely leading to incorrect estimates of the effects of deforestation on land-atmosphere coupling. The calibrated model accurately represented the FLUXNET observed deforestation effects on ET. Importantly, the search for global optimal parameters converged at values consistent with recent observational syntheses, confirming the reliability of the calibrated physical parameters. Applying this improved model parameterization to the globe scale reduced the bias of annual ET simulation by up to -600 mm/year. Analysis on the roles of parameters suggested that future model development to improve ET simulation should focus on stomatal resistance and soil water-related parameterizations. Finally, our predicted differences in seasonal ET changes from deforestation are large enough to substantially affect land-atmosphere coupling and should be considered in such studies.
   Plain Language Summary Deforestation changes Earth's surface characteristics and affects the water cycle and climate. Although Earth system modeling is an important tool to understand the effects of deforestation, current models have large uncertainties. Here we used FLUXNET-based observations to identify biases in representing deforestation effects on evapotranspiration (ET) in the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM). Results showed these biases are mostly associated with the representation of trees, not with smaller vegetation types (e.g., grasses). We then used the observations to optimize model parameters and improved simulations of ET and sensible heat fluxes following deforestation. Globally, these improvements led to a reduction in ET bias of 600 mm/year. This improved model allows improved estimates of the effects of deforestation on the water cycle and climate and could benefit forest management and climate adaptation strategies.
C1 [Cai, Xitian; Riley, William J.; Zhu, Qing; Tang, Jinyun; Bisht, Gautam] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Climate & Ecosyst Sci Div, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
   [Zeng, Zhenzhong] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shenzhen, Peoples R China.
   [Zeng, Zhenzhong] Princeton Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.
   [Randerson, James T.] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Earth Syst Sci, Irvine, CA USA.
C3 United States Department of Energy (DOE); Lawrence Berkeley National
   Laboratory; Southern University of Science & Technology; Princeton
   University; University of California System; University of California
   Irvine
RP Cai, XT (corresponding author), Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Climate & Ecosyst Sci Div, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
EM xtcai@lbl.gov
RI Zeng, Zhenzhong/A-2212-2019; Bisht, Gautam/P-4043-2019; Randerson,
   James/Y-2550-2019; Riley, William/D-3345-2015; Bisht,
   Gautam/J-4822-2014; Tang, Jinyun/M-4922-2013; Cai, Xitian/N-4526-2013;
   ZHU, QING/G-2433-2015
OI Riley, William/0000-0002-4615-2304; Randerson,
   James/0000-0001-6559-7387; Zeng, Zhenzhong/0000-0001-6851-2756; Bisht,
   Gautam/0000-0001-6641-7595; Tang, Jinyun/0000-0002-4792-1259; Cai,
   Xitian/0000-0002-4798-4954; Foufoula-Georgiou, Efi/0000-0003-1078-231X;
   ZHU, QING/0000-0003-2441-944X
FU Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research of
   the U.S. Department of Energy under Regional and Global Climate Modeling
   program through the Reducing Uncertainties in Biogeochemical
   Interactions through Synthesis and Computation Scien
   [DE-AC02-05CH11231]; Office of Science, Office of Biological and
   Environmental Research of the U.S. Department of Energy under Energy
   Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) project [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
FX This research was supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office
   of Biological and Environmental Research of the U.S. Department of
   Energy under contract DE-AC02-05CH11231 as part of their Regional and
   Global Climate Modeling program through the Reducing Uncertainties in
   Biogeochemical Interactions through Synthesis and Computation Scientific
   Focus Area (RUBISCO SFA) project and as part of the Energy Exascale
   Earth System Model (E3SM) project. FLUXNET atmospheric forcing and
   surface fluxes data are publically available online
   (http://fluxnet.fluxdata.org/and http://ameriflux.lbl.gov/). E3SM model
   code is open source and available on https://e3sm.org/.E3SM model
   outputs are available upon request.
CR Alkama R, 2016, SCIENCE, V351, P600, DOI 10.1126/science.aac8083
   [Anonymous], 2013, NCARTN5031STR
   Baldocchi D, 2001, B AM METEOROL SOC, V82, P2415, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<2415:FANTTS>2.3.CO;2
   Bonan GB, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P1444, DOI 10.1126/science.1155121
   Bright RM, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P296, DOI [10.1038/nclimate3250, 10.1038/NCLIMATE3250]
   Brown AE, 2005, J HYDROL, V310, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.12.010
   Cai XT, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V119, P13751, DOI 10.1002/2014JD022113
   Cai XT, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V119, P23, DOI 10.1002/2013JD020792
   Chen L, 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V22, P111, DOI 10.5194/hess-22-111-2018
   Chen L, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034002
   Cheng L, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P5963, DOI 10.1002/2017WR020600
   Collier N, 2018, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V10, P2731, DOI 10.1029/2018MS001354
   Cuntz M, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V121, P10676, DOI 10.1002/2016JD025097
   Dai YJ, 2004, J CLIMATE, V17, P2281, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<2281:ATMFCT>2.0.CO;2
   Davidson EA, 2012, NATURE, V481, P321, DOI 10.1038/nature10717
   Davin EL, 2010, J CLIMATE, V23, P97, DOI 10.1175/2009JCLI3102.1
   Dirmeyer PA, 2010, INT J CLIMATOL, V30, P1905, DOI 10.1002/joc.2157
   Findell KL, 2007, J CLIMATE, V20, P3621, DOI 10.1175/JCLI4185.1
   Findell KL, 2017, NAT COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-01038-w
   Fisher JB, 2011, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V20, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00578.x
   Göhler M, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V118, P904, DOI 10.1002/jgrg.20072
   Golaz JC, 2019, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V11, P2089, DOI 10.1029/2018MS001603
   Good SP, 2015, SCIENCE, V349, P175, DOI 10.1126/science.aaa5931
   Jefferson JL, 2017, J HYDROMETEOROL, V18, P897, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0053.1
   Jung M, 2009, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V6, P2001, DOI 10.5194/bg-6-2001-2009
   Katul GG, 2012, REV GEOPHYS, V50, DOI 10.1029/2011RG000366
   KELLIHER FM, 1995, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V73, P1, DOI 10.1016/0168-1923(94)02178-M
   Kim H., 2017, GLOBAL SOIL WETNESS, DOI [10.20783/DIAS.501, DOI 10.20783/DIAS.501]
   Konings AG, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P891, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13389
   Koster RD, 2006, J HYDROMETEOROL, V7, P590, DOI 10.1175/JHM510.1
   Lawrence DM, 2007, J HYDROMETEOROL, V8, P862, DOI 10.1175/JHM596.1
   Lawrence DM, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P2973, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-2973-2016
   Lawrence D, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P27, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2430, 10.1038/nclimate2430]
   Lee X, 2011, NATURE, V479, P384, DOI 10.1038/nature10588
   Li Y, 2016, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V7, P167, DOI 10.5194/esd-7-167-2016
   Li Y, 2015, NAT COMMUN, V6, DOI 10.1038/ncomms7603
   Li Y, 2018, SCI ADV, V4, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aar4182
   Lian X, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P640, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0207-9
   Lombardozzi DL, 2017, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V10, P321, DOI 10.5194/gmd-10-321-2017
   Nash JE., 1970, Journal of Hydrology, V10, P282, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6]
   Oleson KW, 2004, CLIM DYNAM, V23, P117, DOI 10.1007/s00382-004-0426-9
   Pitman AJ, 2009, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V36, DOI 10.1029/2009GL039076
   Ricciuto D, 2018, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V10, P297, DOI 10.1002/2017MS000962
   Sakaguchi K, 2009, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V114, DOI 10.1029/2008JD010834
   Saltelli A, 2010, COMPUT PHYS COMMUN, V181, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.018
   Sampaio G, 2007, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V34, DOI 10.1029/2007GL030612
   Seneviratne SI, 2006, NATURE, V443, P205, DOI 10.1038/nature05095
   Sobol IM, 2001, MATH COMPUT SIMULAT, V55, P271, DOI 10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6
   Swenson SC, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V119, DOI 10.1002/2014JD022314
   Tang JY, 2015, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V7, P1828, DOI 10.1002/2015MS000484
   Tang JY, 2013, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V5, P558, DOI 10.1002/jame.20034
   Teuling AJ, 2010, NAT GEOSCI, V3, P722, DOI 10.1038/NGEO950
   van Heerwaarden CC, 2014, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V11, P6159, DOI 10.5194/bg-11-6159-2014
   Wang SS, 2015, J HYDROMETEOROL, V16, P1540, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0189.1
   Wickham JD, 2012, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V166, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.07.002
   Williams IN, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V121, P12125, DOI 10.1002/2016JD025223
   Wolf S, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2763, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02460.x
   Yurtseven I, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V618, P785, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.190
   Zeng ZZ, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P432, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3299, 10.1038/nclimate3299]
   Zhang L, 2001, WATER RESOUR RES, V37, P701, DOI 10.1029/2000WR900325
NR 60
TC 26
Z9 28
U1 2
U2 17
PU AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
PI WASHINGTON
PA 2000 FLORIDA AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20009 USA
EI 1942-2466
J9 J ADV MODEL EARTH SY
JI J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst.
PD AUG
PY 2019
VL 11
IS 8
BP 2412
EP 2427
DI 10.1029/2018MS001551
PG 16
WC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA JE8OI
UT WOS:000490949100002
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Price, M
   Harrison, PA
   Jordan, R
   Steane, D
   Vaillancourt, RE
   Prober, SM
AF Price, Meridy
   Harrison, Peter A.
   Jordan, Rebecca
   Steane, Dorothy
   Vaillancourt, Rene E.
   Prober, Suzanne M.
TI Intra-specific variation and climate differentially shape the thermal
   germination niches of three co-occurring woodland forbs
SO AUSTRAL ECOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Arthropodium fimbriatum; Bulbine bulbosa; climate change; forb;
   germination; Microseris walteri; temperature; thermal niche
ID SEED-GERMINATION; ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA; NATIVE FORBS; TRAITS;
   TEMPERATURE; PLASTICITY; REGENERATION; RESTORATION; PERSISTENCE;
   ADAPTATION
AB Understanding plant responses to temperature is critical for predicting their vulnerability to global warming and for planning management responses. Germination is a key life-stage, strongly regulated by temperature, that affects the potential for plant populations to persist. Here, we compared the thermal germination niches of three unrelated, declining woodland forb species - Arthropodium fimbriatum (Asparagaceae), Bulbine bulbosa (Asphodelaceae), Microseris walteri (Asteraceae) - across common temperature and precipitation gradients, to characterize the relationships with home-site climate, and associated implications for ecological restoration in a changing climate. Open-pollinated seed were sampled from 14-15 populations per species across an aridity gradient in south-eastern Australia. Germination responses for each population were tested in controlled temperature cabinets under five temperature regimes encompassing contemporary and projected future temperatures. Optimum germination temperature and thermal germination niche were characterized and assessed for associations with home-site climate and potential germination under projected climate change. The three species showed significant intra-specific variation in the thermal germination niche. Optimum germination temperature was correlated with home-site climate, suggesting adaptive variation among populations in germination requirements. However, the pattern of variation in optimum germination across the environmental gradients was not always consistent among the species. Future temperatures projected under climate change tended to be outside the current thermal germination niche for all species, indicating potential benefits of incorporating pre-adapted populations in ecological restoration. Climate-related intra-specific variation in the thermal germination niche provides evidence for local adaptation to climate in all three forb species and suggests potential differences among populations in vulnerability to global warming. These results emphasize the importance of understanding the extent of intra-specific variation in key life history traits to better manage and conserve populations and restore their ecosystems as climates change.
C1 [Price, Meridy; Harrison, Peter A.; Jordan, Rebecca; Steane, Dorothy; Vaillancourt, Rene E.] Univ Tasmania, Sch Nat Sci, Hobart, Tas, Australia.
   [Price, Meridy; Harrison, Peter A.; Steane, Dorothy; Vaillancourt, Rene E.] Univ Tasmania, Training Ctr Forest Value, Australian Res Council, Hobart, Tas, Australia.
   [Jordan, Rebecca; Steane, Dorothy] CSIRO Environm, Sandy Bay, Tas, Australia.
   [Prober, Suzanne M.] CSIRO Environm, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
   [Prober, Suzanne M.] CSIRO Environm, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
C3 University of Tasmania; University of Tasmania; Commonwealth Scientific
   & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO); Commonwealth Scientific &
   Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO); Commonwealth Scientific &
   Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)
RP Prober, SM (corresponding author), CSIRO Environm, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
EM suzanne.prober@csiro.au
RI Prober, Suzanne/G-6465-2010; Vaillancourt, Rene/J-7456-2014; Harrison,
   Peter/O-2949-2014
OI Harrison, Peter/0000-0002-3502-0242
FU Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Training Centre;
   CSIRO; Australian Government Department of Climate Change, Energy, the
   Environment and Water through the Biodiversity Knowledge Projects series
   (); J Malcolm Gillies Honours Scholarship in Genetics (University of
   Tasmania);  [IC150100004]
FX Seeds were collected under licence SL100792 of the NSW National Parks
   and Wildlife Service. We thank Greening Australia, Brian Parker (Blayney
   Shire Council, NSW, Australia), Jacqui Stol and Anna Simonsen (CSIRO
   Land and Water) for assistance with seed collection and population
   selection. We thank two anonymous reviewers for feedback that helped
   improve this manuscript. This study was supported by the CSIRO and the
   Australian Government Department of Climate Change, Energy, the
   Environment and Water through the Biodiversity Knowledge Projects series
   (). M. P. received the J Malcolm Gillies Honours Scholarship in Genetics
   (University of Tasmania) to support this research. P.A.H was supported
   by the Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Training
   Centre (Grant IC150100004) Program. The authors have no conflicts of
   interests to disclose.
CR Aitken SN, 2013, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V44, P367, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135747
   [Anonymous], 2005, The ecology of seeds
   Baskin CC, 2014, SEEDS: ECOLOGY, BIOGEOGRAPHY, AND EVOLUTION OF DORMANCY AND GERMINATION, 2ND EDITION, P1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-416677-6.00001-9
   Baskin JM, 2004, SEED SCI RES, V14, P1, DOI 10.1079/SSR2003150
   Bell DT, 1999, AUST J BOT, V47, P475, DOI 10.1071/BT98007
   Brooks ME, 2017, R J, V9, P378, DOI 10.32614/RJ-2017-066
   Carta A, 2022, ANN BOT-LONDON, V129, P775, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcac037
   Catelotti K, 2020, DIVERS DISTRIB, V26, P589, DOI 10.1111/ddi.13040
   Chevin LM, 2013, PHILOS T R SOC B, V368, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2012.0089
   Cochrane A, 2019, FOLIA GEOBOT, V54, P29, DOI 10.1007/s12224-019-09335-6
   Cochrane A, 2017, SEED SCI RES, V27, P99, DOI 10.1017/S0960258517000010
   Cochrane A, 2016, SEED SCI RES, V26, P14, DOI 10.1017/S0960258515000355
   Cochrane A, 2015, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V24, P12, DOI 10.1111/geb.12234
   Cochrane A, 2014, SEED SCI RES, V24, P195, DOI 10.1017/S096025851400018X
   Cochrane JA, 2020, PLANTS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/plants9060796
   CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology, 2015, CLIM CHANG AUSTR INF
   Donohue K, 2005, EVOLUTION, V59, P758, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01751.x
   Donohue K, 2005, EVOLUTION, V59, P771, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01752.x
   Donohue K, 2005, EVOLUTION, V59, P740, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01752.x
   Donohue K, 2010, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V41, P293, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144715
   Fernández-Pascual E, 2017, PLANT BIOLOGY, V19, P32, DOI 10.1111/plb.12472
   Fernández-Pascual E, 2021, NEW PHYTOL, V229, P3573, DOI 10.1111/nph.17086
   Filipe Joao C, 2023, Plant Environ Interact, V4, P146, DOI 10.1002/pei3.10108
   Finch J, 2019, PLANT BIOLOGY, V21, P425, DOI 10.1111/plb.12843
   Fox J., 2019, An R Companion to Applied Regression, V3rd ed
   Gibson-Roy Paul, 2010, Victorian Naturalist (Blackburn), V127, P184
   Gremer JR, 2020, AM J BOT, V107, P350, DOI 10.1002/ajb2.1425
   GRUBB PJ, 1977, BIOL REV, V52, P107, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1977.tb01347.x
   Hartig Florian, 2022, CRAN
   Hovenden MJ, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V180, P143, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02563.x
   Huebner CD, 2010, PLANT ECOL DIVERS, V3, P259, DOI 10.1080/17550874.2010.546814
   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2019, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.024
   Jiménez-Alfaro B, 2016, J VEG SCI, V27, P637, DOI 10.1111/jvs.12375
   Jones DA, 2009, AUST METEOROL OCEAN, V58, P233, DOI 10.22499/2.5804.003
   Jordan GJ, 2016, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V25, P127, DOI 10.1111/geb.12389
   Lenth R., 2018, PACKAGE EMMEANS
   Lloret F, 2004, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V10, P248, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00725.x
   Lunt Ian D., 1996, Victorian Naturalist (Blackburn), V113, P16
   Lunt ID, 1995, AUST J BOT, V43, P439, DOI 10.1071/BT9950439
   Lunt ID, 1997, PLANT ECOL, V130, P21, DOI 10.1023/A:1009780301775
   McLean EH, 2014, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V37, P1440, DOI 10.1111/pce.12251
   Müller LLB, 2017, J ECOL, V105, P507, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12681
   Nicotra AB, 2010, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V15, P684, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.008
   Nicotra AB, 2015, ECOL EVOL, V5, P634, DOI 10.1002/ece3.1329
   Ooi MKJ, 2012, PLANT SOIL, V353, P289, DOI 10.1007/s11104-011-1032-3
   Prober SM, 2022, PLANTS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/plants11141846
   Prober Suzanne M., 2005, Ecological Management & Restoration, V6, P16, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2005.00215.x
   Prober SM, 2017, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V241, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.021
   Prober SM, 2015, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V3, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2015.00065
   Probert R. J., 2000, Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities, P261, DOI 10.1079/9780851994321.0261
   Raats M. M., 1992, Food Quality and Preference, V3, P89, DOI 10.1016/0950-3293(91)90028-D
   Rehfeldt GE, 1999, ECOL MONOGR, V69, P375, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0375:GRTCIP]2.0.CO;2
   Rix KD, 2011, SEED SCI TECHNOL, V39, P686
   Rix KD, 2015, ANN FOREST SCI, V72, P457, DOI 10.1007/s13595-014-0450-9
   Seglias AE, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0191931
   Sexton JP, 2017, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V48, P183, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110316-023003
   Smallbone LT, 2007, AUST J BOT, V55, P818, DOI 10.1071/BT07106
   Walck JL, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2145, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02368.x
   Walter GM, 2020, NEW PHYTOL, V226, P1312, DOI 10.1111/nph.16453
   Wood S.N., 2017, Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R, V2nd edn.
   Zuur AF, 2016, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V7, P636, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12577
NR 61
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 5
U2 11
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1442-9985
EI 1442-9993
J9 AUSTRAL ECOL
JI Austral Ecol.
PD FEB
PY 2024
VL 49
IS 2
AR e13480
DI 10.1111/aec.13480
PG 21
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA HE7O0
UT WOS:001157884200001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Arshad, A
   Raza, MA
   Zhang, Y
   Zhang, LZ
   Wang, XJ
   Ahmed, M
   Habib-ur-Rehman, M
AF Arshad, Adnan
   Raza, Muhammad Ali
   Zhang, Yue
   Zhang, Lizhen
   Wang, Xuejiao
   Ahmed, Mukhtar
   Habib-ur-Rehman, Muhammad
TI Impact of Climate Warming on Cotton Growth and Yields in China and
   Pakistan: A Regional Perspective
SO AGRICULTURE-BASEL
LA English
DT Article
DE agrometeorology; temperature increase; cotton phenology; climate-smart
   management; APSIM-cotton crop modelling
ID PLANT-DENSITY; CROP; DETERMINANTS; MANAGEMENT; REGULATOR; PHENOLOGY;
   PUNJAB; LIGHT; MODEL
AB Year to year change in weather poses serious threats to agriculture globally, especially in developing countries. Global climate models simulate an increase in global temperature between 2.9 to 5.5 degrees C till 2060, and crop production is highly vulnerable to climate warming trends. Extreme temperature causes a significant reduction in crop yields by negatively regulating the crop phenology. Therefore, to evaluate warming impact on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production and management practices, we quantified agrometeorological data of 30 years by applying multiple crop modelling tools to compute the expected rise in temperature, impact of crop phenology, yield loss, provision of agrometeorology-services, agronomic technologies, and adaptation to climate-smart agriculture. Model projections of 15 agrometeorology stations showed that the growing duration of the sowing-boll opening and sowing-harvesting stages was reduced by 2.30 to 5.66 days decade(-1) and 4.23 days decade(-1), respectively, in Pakistan. Temperature rise in China also advanced the planting dates, sowing emergence, 3-5 leaves, budding anthesis, full-bloom, cleft-boll, boll-opening, and boll-opening filling by 24.4, 26.2, 24.8, 23.3, 22.6, 15.8, 14.6, 5.4, 2.9, and 8.0 days. Furthermore, present findings exhibited that the warming effect of sowing-harvest time was observed 2.16 days premature, and delayed for 8.2, 2.4, and 5.3 days in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s in China. APSIM-cotton quantification revealed that the sowing, emergence, flowering, and maturity stages were negatively correlated with temperature -2.03, -1.93, -1.09, and -0.42 days degrees C-1 on average, respectively. This study also provided insight into the adaptation of smart and better cotton by improving agrotechnological services.
C1 [Arshad, Adnan; Zhang, Yue; Zhang, Lizhen] China Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Yuanmingyuan West Rd 2, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China.
   [Raza, Muhammad Ali] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Agron, Chengdu 625014, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Xuejiao] Xinjiang Agrometeorol Observ, Urumqi 830002, Peoples R China.
   [Ahmed, Mukhtar] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Agr Res Northern Sweden, POB 7070, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
   [Ahmed, Mukhtar] Arid Agr Univ, Dept Agron, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan.
   [Habib-ur-Rehman, Muhammad] Univ Bonn, Inst Crop Sci & Resource Conservat INRES, D-53115 Bonn, Germany.
   [Habib-ur-Rehman, Muhammad] Muhammad Nawaz Shareef Agr Univ, Dept Agron, Multan 60800, Pakistan.
   [Habib-ur-Rehman, Muhammad] Washington State Univ, AgWeatherNet Program, Washington, DC USA.
C3 China Agricultural University; Sichuan Agricultural University; Swedish
   University of Agricultural Sciences; Arid Agriculture University;
   University of Bonn; Washington State University
RP Zhang, LZ (corresponding author), China Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Yuanmingyuan West Rd 2, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China.
EM ad@cau.edu.cn; L201601001@stu.sicau.edu.cn; zhangyue93@cau.edu.cn;
   zhanglizhen@cau.edu.cn; Xue.Jiao.WANG@outlook.com; mukhtar.ahmed@slu.se;
   mhabibur@uni-bonn.de
RI Rehman, Muhammad/IUN-6032-2023; Raza, Muhammad Ali/R-8597-2019; Arshad,
   Adnan/ABB-9195-2020; Ahmed, Mukhtar/G-7346-2012; Rahman, Muhammad Habib
   ur/C-5573-2016
OI Rahman, Muhammad Habib ur/0000-0002-2823-9959; Raza, Dr. Muhammad
   Ali/0000-0003-3817-6848; Arshad, Adnan/0000-0002-8755-5281; Zhang,
   Lizhen/0000-0003-1606-6824
FU National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFD1000901];
   Major Scientific and Technological Projects of the XPCC [2018AA00403];
   Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps key areas science and
   technology research program [2020AB017]
FX This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development
   Program of China (2018YFD1000901), Major Scientific and Technological
   Projects of the XPCC (2018AA00403) and Xinjiang Production and
   Construction Corps key areas science and technology research program
   (2020AB017).
CR Abdul Rehman Abdul Rehman, 2019, Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, V18, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.jssas.2016.12.005
   Ahmad S, 2017, J AGRON CROP SCI, V203, P442, DOI 10.1111/jac.12206
   Ahmad S, 2019, FIELD CROP RES, V230, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.10.008
   Ahmad S, 2017, PLANTS-BASEL, V6, DOI 10.3390/plants6010007
   Ahmad S, 2017, CLIM RES, V71, P47, DOI 10.3354/cr01419
   Ali A, 2017, CLIM RISK MANAG, V16, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2016.12.001
   Amin A, 2018, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V131, P121, DOI 10.1007/s00704-016-1960-1
   Amin A, 2018, AGR SYST, V167, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.05.010
   [Anonymous], 2012, COTT SCI
   [Anonymous], 2016, STAT FOOD AGR
   Arshad A., 2020, J AGRIC RES, V33, P729
   Arshad A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101468
   Aslam AQ, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V628-629, P1422, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.129
   Chen C, 2015, J METEOROL RES-PRC, V29, P515, DOI 10.1007/s13351-014-4082-7
   Cisse A, 2019, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/agronomy9060312
   FAO, 2016, PLANNING IMPLEMENTIN
   Gu SH, 2018, ANN BOT-LONDON, V121, P1005, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcx210
   Han M, 2015, WATER-SUI, V7, P2622, DOI 10.3390/w7062622
   Huang J, 2015, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V59, P877, DOI 10.1007/s00484-014-0904-7
   Imran MA, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10062101
   Iqbal M, 2017, EUPHYTICA, V213, DOI 10.1007/s10681-017-1916-2
   Khan N, 2019, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V136, P899, DOI 10.1007/s00704-018-2520-7
   Kriegler E., 2018, IPCCSR15
   Li Y, 2017, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V129, P1017, DOI 10.1007/s00704-016-1827-5
   Li ZG, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P39, DOI 10.1007/s10113-013-0503-x
   Mao LL, 2018, FIELD CROP RES, V224, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.04.017
   McGuire S, 2015, ADV NUTR, V6, P623, DOI 10.3945/an.115.009936
   Pettigrew WT, 2008, CROP SCI, V48, P278, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2007.05.0261
   Rahman MHU, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V253, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.02.008
   Raza MA, 2020, FOOD ENERGY SECUR, V9, DOI 10.1002/fes3.199
   Raza MA, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-41364-1
   Saleem MF, 2018, IND CROP PROD, V124, P885, DOI 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.07.084
   Statista, 2017, WORLD COTT PROD COUN
   Tian L.W., 2014, COTT SCI, V1, P3
   UNEP, 2001, UNEP SYNTH REP COTT
   Wang BL, 2013, QUATERN INT, V298, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.09.010
   Wang Q, 2017, FIELD CROP RES, V213, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.07.016
   Wang Q, 2016, EUR J AGRON, V79, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2016.05.009
   Wang XJ, 2014, AOB PLANTS, V6, DOI 10.1093/aobpla/plu040
   Wang ZB, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-07056-4
   Zafar S.A., 2018, Past, present and future trends in cotton breeding, P65
   Zhang DS, 2014, FIELD CROP RES, V169, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.09.001
   Zhang L, 2008, FIELD CROP RES, V106, P258, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.12.010
   Zhang L, 2008, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V56, P59, DOI 10.1016/S1573-5214(08)80017-6
   Zhao WC, 2017, CROP SCI, V57, P1713, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2016.12.1008
   Zhou XY, 2014, J HYDROL, V519, P769, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.004
   Zulfiqar F, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P3468, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.024
   Zulfiqar F, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V166, P1372, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.155
NR 48
TC 39
Z9 40
U1 3
U2 53
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2077-0472
J9 AGRICULTURE-BASEL
JI Agriculture-Basel
PD FEB
PY 2021
VL 11
IS 2
AR 97
DI 10.3390/agriculture11020097
PG 22
WC Agronomy
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA QM8CO
UT WOS:000622001100001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Lancaster, LT
   Dudaniec, RY
   Hansson, B
   Svensson, EI
AF Lancaster, Lesley T.
   Dudaniec, Rachael Y.
   Hansson, Bengt
   Svensson, Erik I.
TI Latitudinal shift in thermal niche breadth results from thermal release
   during a climate-mediated range expansion
SO JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
LA English
DT Article
DE Character release; colonization and range shifts; habitat suitability;
   insect invasions; macroecology; Ischnura elegans; Maxent; species
   distribution model; Sweden; thermotolerance
ID EVOLUTIONARY RESPONSES; MOUNTAIN PASSES; TOLERANCE; ADAPTATION; MARGINS;
   DISTRIBUTIONS; CONSEQUENCES; COLONIZATION; TEMPERATURE; PLASTICITY
AB AimClimate change is currently altering the geographical distribution of species, but how this process contributes to biogeographical variation in ecological traits is unknown. Range-shifting species are predicted to encounter and respond to new selective regimes during their expansion phase, but also carry historical adaptations to their ancestral range. We sought to identify how historical and novel components of the environment interact to shape latitudinal trends in thermal tolerance, thermal tolerance breadth and phenotypic plasticity of a range-shifting species.
   LocationSouthern and central Sweden.
   MethodsTo evaluate phenotypic responses to changes in the thermal selective environment, we experimentally determined the upper and lower thermal tolerances of >2000 wild-caught damselflies (Ischnura elegans) from populations distributed across core and expanding range-edge regions. We then identified changing correlations between thermal tolerance, climate and recent weather events across the range expansion. Niche modelling was employed to evaluate the relative contributions of varying climatic selective regimes to overall habitat suitability for the species in core versus range-edge regions.
   ResultsUpper thermal tolerance exhibited local adaptation to climate in the core region, but showed evidence of having been released from thermal selection during the current range expansion. In contrast, chill coma recovery exhibited local adaptation across the core region and range expansion, corresponding to increased climatic variability at higher latitudes. Adaptive plasticity of lower thermal tolerances (acclimation ability) increased towards the northern, expanding range edge.
   Main conclusionsOur results suggest micro-evolutionary mechanisms for several large-scale and general biogeographical patterns, including spatially and latitudinally invariant heat tolerances (Brett's rule) and increased thermal acclimation rates and niche breadths at higher latitudes. Population-level processes unique to climate-mediated range expansions may commonly underpin many broader, macro-physiological trends.
C1 [Lancaster, Lesley T.] Univ Aberdeen, Inst Biol & Environm Sci, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, Scotland.
   [Dudaniec, Rachael Y.; Hansson, Bengt; Svensson, Erik I.] Lund Univ, Dept Biol, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden.
C3 University of Aberdeen; Lund University
RP Lancaster, LT (corresponding author), Univ Aberdeen, Sch Biol Sci, Zoology Bldg,Tillydrone Ave, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, Scotland.
EM lesleylancaster@abdn.ac.uk
RI Dudaniec, Rachael/AAR-7034-2020; Hansson, Bengt/L-8874-2013; Svensson,
   Erik/E-8324-2010
OI Dudaniec, Rachael/0000-0002-1854-6808; Hansson,
   Bengt/0000-0001-6694-8169; Svensson, Erik/0000-0001-9006-016X
FU strategic research environment Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in a
   Changing Climate (BECC; a joint Lund-Gothenberg University initiative);
   Wenner-Gren Foundation; Swedish Research Council (VR); Royal Swedish
   Academy of Sciences (KVA) Stiftelsen Anna-Greta and Holger Crafoords
   Fund; VR and The Crafoord Foundation
FX We thank Hanna Bensch, Yuma Takahashi and Hannes Wiese for their
   assistance with fieldwork. Thanks to Jarrod Hadfield and Julien Martin
   for advice on model fitting in MCMCglmm. Funding for this project was
   provided by the strategic research environment Biodiversity and
   Ecosystem Services in a Changing Climate (BECC; a joint Lund-Gothenberg
   University initiative) to B.H. and L.L., the Wenner-Gren Foundation to
   B.H. and R.Y.D., the Swedish Research Council (VR) and The Royal Swedish
   Academy of Sciences (KVA) Stiftelsen Anna-Greta and Holger Crafoords
   Fund to E.I.S., and VR and The Crafoord Foundation to B.H.
CR Addo-Bediako A, 2000, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V267, P739, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2000.1065
   [Anonymous], 2012, COXME MIXED EFFECTS
   [Anonymous], 2012, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
   Araújo MB, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P1206, DOI 10.1111/ele.12155
   Bolnick DI, 2010, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V277, P1789, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.0018
   Bouton N, 2011, J INSECT SCI, V11, DOI 10.1673/031.011.11201
   BRETT JR, 1956, Q REV BIOL, V31, P75, DOI 10.1086/401257
   Bridle JR, 2014, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V281, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2013.1800
   Chen IC, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P1024, DOI 10.1126/science.1206432
   Chevin LM, 2011, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V24, P1462, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02279.x
   Chown SL, 2002, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS B, V131, P587, DOI 10.1016/S1096-4959(02)00017-9
   Clarke A, 2003, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V18, P573, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2003.08.007
   Davis MB, 2005, ECOLOGY, V86, P1704, DOI 10.1890/03-0788
   Dijkstra K.D. W., 2006, Field guide to the dragonflies and damselflies of Britain and Europe
   Gaston KJ, 2009, AM NAT, V174, P595, DOI 10.1086/605982
   Ghalambor CK, 2006, INTEGR COMP BIOL, V46, P5, DOI 10.1093/icb/icj003
   Grigg JW, 2013, BIOL LETTERS, V9, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2012.1056
   Hadfield JD, 2010, J STAT SOFTW, V33, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v033.i02
   Hannah L, 2002, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V11, P485, DOI 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00306.x
   Hewitt GM, 1999, BIOL J LINN SOC, V68, P87, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01160.x
   Hickling R, 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V11, P502, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00904.x
   Hijmans R.J., 2013, dismo: Species distribution modeling. R package version 0.8-17
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   Hoffmann AA, 2013, FUNCT ECOL, V27, P934, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02036.x
   Jaenson TGT, 2012, PARASITE VECTOR, V5, DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-5-8
   Janes JK, 2014, MOL BIOL EVOL, V31, P1803, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msu135
   JANZEN DH, 1967, AM NAT, V101, P233, DOI 10.1086/282487
   Keller SR, 2009, NEW PHYTOL, V183, P678, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02892.x
   Kellermann V, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P16228, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1207553109
   Klok CJ, 2004, J EXP BIOL, V207, P2361, DOI 10.1242/jeb.01023
   Loarie SR, 2009, NATURE, V462, P1052, DOI 10.1038/nature08649
   Menéndez R, 2008, ECOL ENTOMOL, V33, P413, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2008.00985.x
   O'Neil ST, 2014, MOL ECOL, V23, P2686, DOI 10.1111/mec.12773
   Oliver TH, 2012, J APPL ECOL, V49, P581, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02138.x
   Parmesan C, 2006, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V37, P637, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
   Payne N. M., 1926, BIOL BULL, V52, P449
   Peterson AT, 2008, ECOL MODEL, V213, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.11.008
   Phillips SJ, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V190, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
   Preisser EL, 2008, ECOL ENTOMOL, V33, P709, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2008.01021.x
   Reusch TBH, 2007, MOL ECOL, V16, P3973, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03454.x
   Rolland J, 2014, PLOS BIOL, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001775
   Shama LNS, 2011, MOL ECOL, V20, P2929, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05156.x
   Sheldon KS, 2014, ECOLOGY, V95, P2134, DOI 10.1890/13-1703.1
   Sunday JM, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P5610, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1316145111
   Sunday JM, 2011, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V278, P1823, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.1295
   Terblanche JS, 2011, J EXP BIOL, V214, P3713, DOI 10.1242/jeb.061283
   Thomas CD, 2001, NATURE, V411, P577, DOI 10.1038/35079066
   Williams SE, 2008, PLOS BIOL, V6, P2621, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060325
NR 48
TC 71
Z9 75
U1 0
U2 103
PU WILEY-BLACKWELL
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0305-0270
EI 1365-2699
J9 J BIOGEOGR
JI J. Biogeogr.
PD OCT
PY 2015
VL 42
IS 10
BP 1953
EP 1963
DI 10.1111/jbi.12553
PG 11
WC Ecology; Geography, Physical
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Physical Geography
GA CR2SX
UT WOS:000361181900014
OA Bronze, Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Alemayehu, FR
   Frenck, G
   van der Linden, L
   Mikkelsen, TN
   Jorgensen, RB
AF Alemayehu, Fikadu Reta
   Frenck, Georg
   van der Linden, Leon
   Mikkelsen, Teis Norgaard
   Jorgensen, Rikke Bagger
TI Can barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L. s.l.) adapt to fast climate
   changes? A controlled selection experiment
SO GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Barley genotypes; Breeding; Generational selection; Genetic adaptation;
   Hordeum vulgare L. s.l
ID ELEVATED CO2; ATMOSPHERIC CO2; GENETIC DIVERSITY; LEAF SENESCENCE;
   CARBON-DIOXIDE; BRASSICA-NAPUS; OILSEED RAPE; HEAT-STRESS; GRAIN-YIELD;
   TEMPERATURE
AB The projected future climate will affect the global agricultural production negatively, however, to keep abreast of the expected increase in global population, the agricultural production must increase. Therefore, to safeguard the future crop yield and quality, the adaptive potential of crops to environmental change needs to be explored in order to select the most productive genotypes. Presently, it is unknown whether cereal crops like spring barley can adapt to climate stressors over relatively few generations. To evaluate if strong selection pressures could change the performance of barley to environmental stress, we conducted a selection experiment over five plant generations (G0-G4) in three scenarios, where atmospheric [CO2] and temperature were increased as single factors and in combination. The treatments represented the expected environmental characteristics in Northern Europe around year 2075 [700 ppm CO2, 22/17 degrees C (day/night)] as well as a control mimicking present day conditions (390 ppm CO2, 19/12 degrees C). Two different barley accessions, a modern cultivar and an old landrace, were evaluated in terms of yield and biomass production. In all treatments representing future environmental scenarios, the G4-generation of selected plants did not improve its reproductive output compared to the G0-generation, as G4 produced less seeds and had a lower yield than unselected plants. These results indicate that barley might not respond positively to rapid and strong selection by elevated [CO2] and temperature, contrary to previous results from oilseed rape. The two barley accessions analyzed presented almost the same response pattern in a given treatment, though the modern cultivar had the highest yield in the climate scenarios, while the landrace was superior in yield under present day climate conditions.
C1 [Alemayehu, Fikadu Reta; Mikkelsen, Teis Norgaard; Jorgensen, Rikke Bagger] DTU, Dept Chem & Biochem Engn, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
   [Frenck, Georg] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Osborne Lab, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England.
   [van der Linden, Leon] Australian Water Qual Ctr, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
C3 Technical University of Denmark; University of Sheffield
RP Jorgensen, RB (corresponding author), DTU, Dept Chem & Biochem Engn, Riso Campus,BIO 309,Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
EM rijq@kt.dtu.dk
RI Alemayehu, Fikadu/KTI-5486-2024; van der Linden, Leon/B-2375-2009;
   Mikkelsen, Teis/N-4089-2015
OI Mikkelsen, Teis Norgaard/0000-0001-7470-6522; Alemayehu, Fikadu
   Reta/0000-0002-3510-0576; van der Linden, Leon/0000-0001-7995-9158
FU Riso DTU; Aarhus University; NordForsk (the Nordic Council of Ministers)
FX This study was funded by Riso DTU, Aarhus University and NordForsk (the
   Nordic Council of Ministers). Thanks to colleges in the NordForsk
   network for "Sustainable primary production in a changing climate'' for
   valuable discussions. The staff at Riso DTU is also thanked for their
   assistance.
CR Altenbach SB, 2003, J CEREAL SCI, V37, P9, DOI 10.1006/jcrs.2002.0483
   Amthor JS, 2001, FIELD CROP RES, V73, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00179-4
   Anderson JT, 2011, TRENDS GENET, V27, P258, DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2011.04.001
   [Anonymous], PROD SUPPL DISTR ONL
   [Anonymous], WORLD POP PROSP 2010
   [Anonymous], OECD FAO AGR OUTL
   [Anonymous], 2006, BIBLIOTHECA FRAGM AG
   [Anonymous], 2009, FEED WORLD 2050
   Araus JL, 2008, CRIT REV PLANT SCI, V27, P377, DOI 10.1080/07352680802467736
   Barnabas B, 2008, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V31, P11, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01727.x
   Brantestam AK, 2007, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V54, P749, DOI 10.1007/s10722-006-9159-4
   Ceccarelli S, 2010, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V148, P627, DOI 10.1017/S0021859610000651
   Chauhan S, 2005, J AGRON CROP SCI, V191, P88, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2004.00122.x
   Clausen SK, 2011, J AGRON CROP SCI, V197, P442, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2011.00478.x
   Ellis RP, 2000, J EXP BOT, V51, P9, DOI 10.1093/jexbot/51.342.9
   Fangmeier A, 2000, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V44, P151, DOI 10.1016/S0098-8472(00)00067-8
   Frenck G, 2013, ECOL EVOL, V3, P1163, DOI 10.1002/ece3.523
   Frenck G, 2011, EUR J AGRON, V35, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2011.05.004
   Hakala K, 2012, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V150, P145, DOI 10.1017/S0021859611000694
   Hatfield JL, 2011, AGRON J, V103, P351, DOI 10.2134/agronj2010.0303
   Jablonski LM, 2002, NEW PHYTOL, V156, P9, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00494.x
   Jaggard KW, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P2835, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0153
   Johannessen MM, 2005, PLANT BREEDING, V124, P253, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2005.01096.x
   Johannessen MM, 2002, EUPHYTICA, V128, P75, DOI 10.1023/A:1020672116652
   Jump AS, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P1010, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00796.x
   Kraakman ATW, 2004, GENETICS, V168, P435, DOI 10.1534/genetics.104.026831
   Leakey ADB, 2012, PHILOS T R SOC B, V367, P613, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2011.0248
   Lobell DB, 2007, ENVIRON RES LETT, V2, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/2/1/014002
   Long SP, 2006, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V29, P315, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01493.x
   Long SP, 2006, SCIENCE, V312, P1918, DOI 10.1126/science.1114722
   Luo Q, 2009, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V129, P261, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.09.010
   Makino A, 2011, PLANT PHYSIOL, V155, P125, DOI 10.1104/pp.110.165076
   Manderscheid R, 1997, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V64, P65, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(97)00020-0
   Mangelsen E, 2011, MOL PLANT, V4, P97, DOI 10.1093/mp/ssq058
   Martín-Olmedo P, 2002, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V8, P643, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00499.x
   Nevo E, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P3412, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1121411109
   Newton AC, 2010, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V30, P237, DOI 10.1051/agro/2009032
   Prasad PVV, 2002, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V8, P710, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00508.x
   Pswarayi A, 2008, EUPHYTICA, V163, P435, DOI 10.1007/s10681-008-9726-1
   Savolainen O, 2004, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V197, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.006
   Scursoni JA, 2005, WEED TECHNOL, V19, P790, DOI 10.1614/WT-03-065R.1
   Semenov MA, 2011, SCI REP-UK, V1, DOI 10.1038/srep00066
   Smil V., 2005, Yields of farmed species: constraints and opportunities in the 21st century. Proceedings of a University of Nottingham Easter School Series, June 2004, Sutton Bonington, UK, P1
   Solomon S, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1
   Stanton ML, 2004, AM NAT, V164, P736, DOI 10.1086/425331
   Taub DR, 2000, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V23, P649, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00574.x
   Tubiello FN, 2000, EUR J AGRON, V13, P179, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00073-3
   Warren JM, 2011, TREE PHYSIOL, V31, P117, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpr002
   Ziska LH, 2004, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V10, P1810, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00840.x
NR 49
TC 15
Z9 16
U1 0
U2 71
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 0925-9864
EI 1573-5109
J9 GENET RESOUR CROP EV
JI Genet. Resour. Crop Evol.
PD JAN
PY 2014
VL 61
IS 1
BP 151
EP 161
DI 10.1007/s10722-013-0021-1
PG 11
WC Agronomy; Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Plant Sciences
GA 298BH
UT WOS:000330298400010
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Pan, H
   Zhang, H
   Youlatos, D
   Wang, J
   He, G
   Guo, ST
   Huang, K
   Hou, R
   Pan, RL
   Fang, G
   Li, YL
   Zhang, P
   Li, BG
AF Pan, Hao
   Zhang, He
   Youlatos, Dionisios
   Wang, Jing
   He, Gang
   Guo, Songtao
   Huang, Kang
   Hou, Rong
   Pan, Ruliang
   Fang, Gu
   Li, Yuli
   Zhang, Pei
   Li, Baoguo
TI Evolutionary Insights from Dental Diversity in Afro-Asian Primates
SO DIVERSITY-BASEL
LA English
DT Article
DE Cercopithecidae; dental allometry analysis; environmental and climate
   changes; Africa and Asia primates; natural selection and environmental
   adaptation
ID QINGHAI-TIBET PLATEAU; SEXUAL-DIMORPHISM; SOUTHEAST-ASIA; MIDDLE
   PLEISTOCENE; ISOTOPIC EVIDENCE; COLOBINE FOSSILS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; 1ST
   DISCOVERY; LATE MIOCENE; AFRICAN
AB The evolutionary development and phylogenetic division between Asian and African cercopithecoids (Cercopithecidae) have attracted significant attention in genetics, molecular biology, behavior, and morphology. However, less emphasis has been placed on how they have evolved morphologically after divergence, approximately 10 million years ago (mya) for Colobinae and 5-7 mya for Cercopithecinae, corresponding to the significant variation and diversity in landscape, climate, habitat, and ecologies between the two continents. This study examines whether such variation and diversity have been reflected in dental morphology. Our findings reveal substantial differences between Hylobatidae and Cercopithecidae, as well as between Colobinae and Cercopithecinae, indicating that size-adjusted dental variation mainly reveals the diversity associated with evolution and phylogenetic inertia. Interestingly, despite the earlier divergence of Afro-Asian colobines, their Euclidean Distance is comparable to that of Afro-Asian cercopithecines. This implies that latecomers (macaques) demonstrate equivalent diversity to colobines due to their extensive dispersion and broader adaptative radiation on the same continent. Colobinae exhibit more developed premolar and molar regions. However, when post-canine teeth are considered alone, Colobinae present a significantly larger molar size than Asian Cercopithecinae but not with the African Cercopihecinae. This contradicts the hypothesis that folivorous primates (Colobinae) have larger post-canine molars than frugivorous ones (Cercopithecinae). The considerable molar size in African Cercopithecinae must be associated with their more protrusive and larger facial structure rather than a specific dietary preference, being less diverse than their Asian counterparts-a trait that has evolved phylogenetically. This study also paves the way for further exploration of facial and cranial differences between the continental groups of Cercopithecinae and Colobinae, delving deeply into diversity variation due to geographical and climatic adaptations.
C1 [Pan, Hao; Wang, Jing; He, Gang; Guo, Songtao; Huang, Kang; Hou, Rong; Pan, Ruliang; Fang, Gu; Li, Yuli; Zhang, Pei; Li, Baoguo] Northwest Univ, Coll Life Sci, Shaanxi Key Lab Anim Conservat, Xian 710069, Peoples R China.
   [Pan, Hao; Zhang, He; Youlatos, Dionisios; He, Gang; Hou, Rong; Pan, Ruliang; Li, Baoguo] Dali Univ, Int Ctr Biodivers & Primate Conservat, Dali 671003, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, He] Jiangxi Agr Univ, Coll Forestry, Jiangxi Prov Key Lab Conservat Biol, Nanchang 330029, Peoples R China.
   [Youlatos, Dionisios] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Biol, Dept Zool, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
   [Pan, Ruliang] Univ Western Australia, Sch Human Sci, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
C3 Northwest University Xi'an; Dali University; Jiangxi Agricultural
   University; Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; University of Western
   Australia
RP Zhang, P; Li, BG (corresponding author), Northwest Univ, Coll Life Sci, Shaanxi Key Lab Anim Conservat, Xian 710069, Peoples R China.; Li, BG (corresponding author), Dali Univ, Int Ctr Biodivers & Primate Conservat, Dali 671003, Peoples R China.
EM panhao0502@163.com; ruliang.pan@uwa.edu.au; peizhang@nwu.edu.cn;
   baoguoli@nwu.edu.cn
RI Zhang, He/GZA-6164-2022; Pan, Ruliang/G-2662-2015; 张, 培/IVV-3667-2023;
   Gioulatos, Dionysios/C-2150-2008
OI Pan, Hao/0000-0002-6048-281X; Zhang, He/0000-0002-1832-8480; Gioulatos,
   Dionysios/0000-0001-8276-727X; Pan, Ruliang/0000-0003-4467-2143
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China; Key Research and
   Development Program of Shaanxi [2024NC-YBXM-116];  [32371563]; 
   [32170507];  [32400414];  [32170515];  [32370534];  [32070450]; 
   [32071495];  [32101238];  [32300413]
FX This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China
   (32371563, 32170507, 32400414, 32170515, 32370534, 32070450, 32071495,
   32101238, 32300413), and the Key Research and Development Program of
   Shaanxi (2024NC-YBXM-116).
CR Albert A, 2014, BIOL CONSERV, V170, P300, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.016
   [Anonymous], 2004, Dental functional morphology: how teeth work
   Bacon AM, 2006, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V230, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.07.023
   Balolia KL, 2021, INT J PRIMATOL, V42, P737, DOI 10.1007/s10764-021-00233-3
   Balolia KL, 2013, INT J PRIMATOL, V34, P361, DOI 10.1007/s10764-013-9666-z
   Begun D.R., 2023, A Companion to Biological Anthropology the Past and the Dead, P365
   Bird MI, 2005, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V24, P2228, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.04.004
   Bonnefille R, 2010, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V72, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.01.015
   Bouilhol P, 2013, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V366, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.01.023
   BOUVIER M, 1986, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V69, P473, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330690406
   Brandon-Jones D, 2004, INT J PRIMATOL, V25, P97, DOI 10.1023/B:IJOP.0000014647.18720.32
   Brockelman Warren Y., 2009, P211, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-88604-6_11
   BROWN MT, 1983, J LEISURE RES, V15, P290, DOI 10.1080/00222216.1983.11969564
   Bunn JM, 2009, AM J PRIMATOL, V71, P466, DOI 10.1002/ajp.20676
   Burke K, 2016, CAN J EARTH SCI, V53, P1089, DOI 10.1139/cjes-2016-0099
   Chang CH, 2012, J HUM EVOL, V63, P439, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.03.005
   Chapman CA, 2000, AM J PRIMATOL, V50, P169, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(200003)50:3<169::AID-AJP1>3.0.CO;2-P
   Chauhan PR, 2010, VERTEBR PALEOBIOL PA, P145, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-9036-2_10
   Corvinus G, 2004, QUATERN INT, V117, P141, DOI 10.1016/S1040-6182(03)00124-1
   Davies A. Glyn, 1994, P285
   Delson E., 1980, P10
   Delson E., 2003, Asian Paleoprimatology, V3, P48
   DEMENOCAL PB, 1995, SCIENCE, V270, P53, DOI 10.1126/science.270.5233.53
   Deutsch AR, 2022, AM J BIOL ANTHROPOL, V177, P4, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.24430
   Dirks W, 2020, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V172, P528, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.24094
   Elbelrhiti H, 2012, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V138, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.08.033
   Elton S, 2007, FOLIA PRIMATOL, V78, P344, DOI 10.1159/000105149
   FA JE, 1989, MAMMAL REV, V19, P45, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1989.tb00401.x
   Favre A, 2015, BIOL REV, V90, P236, DOI 10.1111/brv.12107
   Filoux A, 2015, GEOBIOS-LYON, V48, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.geobios.2015.07.003
   Frisch J. E., 1963, Primates, V4, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF01659148
   Gilbert CC, 2020, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V287, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2020.1655
   Guangxi-Museum, 2012, Guangxi Ethnic Museum
   Guatelli-Steinberg D, 2023, J HUM EVOL, V180, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2023.103384
   Han KS, 2023, PALAEOWORLD, V32, P573, DOI 10.1016/j.palwor.2022.09.008
   HAPPEL R, 1988, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V75, P303, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330750303
   Harrison T, 2016, DEV PRIMATOL-PROG PR, P91, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-5614-2_4
   Harrison T, 2014, QUATERN INT, V354, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.01.013
   HARVEY PH, 1978, J ZOOL, V186, P475
   HYLANDER WL, 1979, J MORPHOL, V160, P223, DOI 10.1002/jmor.1051600208
   Ingicco T., 2014, Bulletins et Memoires de la Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris, V26, P147, DOI 10.1007/s13219-014-0098-x
   Ito T, 2018, J HUM EVOL, V119, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.02.002
   Ito T, 2014, J HUM EVOL, V72, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.04.001
   Iwamoto M, 2005, ANTHROPOL SCI, V113, P123, DOI 10.1537/ase.04S017
   Jablonski N.G., 2008, Primate Fossil Record, P255
   Jablonski Nina G., 1999, Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement, V57, P307
   Jablonski Nina G., 2009, P111, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-88604-6_7
   Ji XP, 2020, J HUM EVOL, V147, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102866
   Ji XP, 2013, CHINESE SCI BULL, V58, P3771, DOI 10.1007/s11434-013-6021-x
   Jouffroy F., 1959, Bull. Mus Nat Dhist Nat. Paris, V31, P309
   KAY RF, 1975, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V43, P195, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330430207
   KAY RF, 1975, SCIENCE, V189, P63
   KELLEY J, 1995, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V96, P365, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330960405
   Kotla SS, 2018, J ASIAN EARTH SCI, V163, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.05.019
   Koyabu DB, 2010, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V142, P137, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.21213
   Koyabu DB, 2009, J HUM EVOL, V56, P525, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.12.009
   LEUTENEGGER W, 1977, Primates, V18, P117, DOI 10.1007/BF02382954
   LEUTENEGGER W, 1987, J HUM EVOL, V16, P359, DOI 10.1016/0047-2484(87)90066-2
   Levin NE, 2004, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V219, P93, DOI 10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00707-6
   Lewis L.A., 2011, African Environments and Resources
   Li BG, 2020, AM J PRIMATOL, V82, DOI 10.1002/ajp.23142
   LI JJ, 1991, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V10, P479, DOI 10.1016/0277-3791(91)90041-R
   Li XR, 2006, J ARID ENVIRON, V64, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.06.011
   Li ZW, 2022, J MT SCI-ENGL, V19, P418, DOI 10.1007/s11629-021-6985-y
   Liu XD, 2013, CHINESE SCI BULL, V58, P4277, DOI 10.1007/s11434-013-5987-8
   Lopatin A., 2021, Doklady Biological Sciences
   Louys J, 2012, CR PALEVOL, V11, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.crpv.2011.03.003
   Lucas S.G., 2001, Chinese Fossil Vertebrates, P320
   Ma S.L., 1979, Acta Theriol. Sin, V17, P13
   Martin F, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-32092-z
   Martin RD, 2005, J EXP BIOL, V208, P1731, DOI 10.1242/jeb.01566
   Maslin MA, 2007, J HUM EVOL, V53, P443, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.06.005
   Napier J.R., 1967, A Handbook of Living Primates: Morphology, Ecology and Behaviour of Nonhuman Primates
   Ogino S, 2011, J ASIAN EARTH SCI, V42, P408, DOI 10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.05.017
   Ogino S, 2009, PALEONTOL RES, V13, P367, DOI 10.2517/1342-8144-13.4.367
   Ortiz A, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0131206
   Pan R, 2001, PRIMATES, V42, P75, DOI 10.1007/BF02640691
   Pan RL, 2003, ZOOL STUD, V42, P93
   Pan Ru-liang, 2007, Zoological Research, V28, P569
   Pan RL, 2006, J MORPHOL, V267, P1087, DOI 10.1002/jmor.10463
   Pan Yuerong, 1992, Acta Anthropologica Sinica, V11, P303
   Patterson EW, 2023, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V120, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2219489120
   Petersdorf M, 2019, J HUM EVOL, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.06.006
   PIRIE P L, 1978, Primates, V19, P583, DOI 10.1007/BF02373318
   Plavcan J.M., 2004, Sexual Selection, Measures of Sexual Selection, and Sexual Dimorphism in Primates
   PLAVCAN JM, 1992, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V87, P461, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330870407
   Plavcan JM, 2001, YEARB PHYS ANTHROPOL, V44, P25, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.10011
   Pushkina D, 2010, NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, V97, P299, DOI 10.1007/s00114-009-0642-6
   QUADE J, 1995, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V115, P91, DOI 10.1016/0031-0182(94)00108-K
   QUADE J, 1989, NATURE, V342, P163, DOI 10.1038/342163a0
   Raaum RL, 2005, J HUM EVOL, V48, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.11.007
   Rasmussen D.T., 2002, Primate Fossil Record, P255
   RAVOSA MJ, 1990, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V82, P199, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330820209
   Reichard Ulrich H., 2003, P190
   Roos C, 2019, J HUM EVOL, V133, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.05.017
   Roos C, 2011, BMC EVOL BIOL, V11, DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-77
   Rowley DB, 1996, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V145, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0012-821X(96)00201-4
   Schillaci MA, 2017, RAFFLES B ZOOL, V65, P3
   Scott JE, 2018, J HUM EVOL, V121, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.04.006
   Scott JE, 2011, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V146, P20, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.21535
   Selig KR, 2022, J MAMM EVOL, V29, P947, DOI 10.1007/s10914-022-09623-7
   Shi ZG, 2019, CLIM DYNAM, V53, P4433, DOI 10.1007/s00382-019-04796-z
   Singh S, 2013, INT J EARTH SCI, V102, P2019, DOI 10.1007/s00531-013-0893-5
   Smith RJ, 2009, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V140, P476, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.21090
   SMITH RJ, 1981, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V55, P323, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330550306
   SMITH RJ, 1983, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V61, P315, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330610306
   Spicer RA, 2021, NATL SCI REV, V8, DOI 10.1093/nsr/nwaa091
   Stokes CR, 2022, NATURE, V608, P275, DOI 10.1038/s41586-022-04946-0
   Szalay F.S., 1979, EVOLUTIONARY HIST PR
   Takai M., 2009, ASIAN PALEOPRIMATOL, V5, P1
   Takai M, 2016, HIST BIOL, V28, P172, DOI 10.1080/08912963.2015.1018018
   Takai M, 2015, J HUM EVOL, V84, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.04.003
   Takai M, 2014, QUATERN INT, V354, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.02.021
   Warton DI, 2006, BIOL REV, V81, P259, DOI 10.1017/S1464793106007007
   WILLIAMSON PG, 1985, NATURE, V315, P487, DOI 10.1038/315487a0
   Wrangham RW, 1998, INT J PRIMATOL, V19, P949, DOI 10.1023/A:1020318102257
   Wu X., 1995, Human Evolution in China. A Metric Description of the Fossils and a Review of the Sites
   Wu XZ, 2004, INT J PRIMATOL, V25, P1093, DOI 10.1023/B:IJOP.0000043353.24043.19
   Wurster CM, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P15508, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1005507107
   Zeitoun V, 2010, QUATERN INT, V220, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2009.11.022
   Zhang DF, 2000, ENVIRON GEOL, V39, P1352, DOI 10.1007/s002540000174
   Zhang H, 2022, BIOL CONSERV, V273, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109681
   Zhao C, 2016, ADV METEOROL, V2016, DOI 10.1155/2016/2450697
NR 123
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 4
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 1424-2818
J9 DIVERSITY-BASEL
JI Diversity-Basel
PD SEP
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 9
AR 565
DI 10.3390/d16090565
PG 15
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA H4Y9E
UT WOS:001323524100001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Hu, WT
   Nickolaevich, AV
   Huang, Y
   Xiao, ST
AF Hu, Wentao
   Nickolaevich, Alekhin Vladimir
   Huang, Yue
   Xiao, Shuoting
TI Design and adaptability analysis of filling rate of a self-insulation
   wall considering thermal performance, benefit-cost, and cold-winter and
   hot-summer climate
SO CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
LA English
DT Article
DE Self-insulated wall; Insulation materials; Thermal performance;
   Comparative test method; Benefit-cost analysis method
ID OPTIMIZATION
AB The filling rate of different insulation materials significantly affects three influencing factors of self-insulating walls: insulation performance, benefit-cost, and climate adaptability. However, considering only one or two influencing factors of a self-insulating wall cannot satisfy the comprehensive needs of building users. Therefore, this experiment comprehensively considered three influencing factors to design five types of self-insulating wall models with different filling rates (0 %, 25 %, 50 %, 75 %, and 100 %) to obtain the best filling rate scheme for insulation materials. EnergyPlus software was used to simulate the operating state of the self-insulating walls. A comparative analysis of the thermal performance and economic benefit indices indicated that compared to Type (A-1), the average inner surface temperatures of Types (B-1), (C-1), (D-1), and (E-1) increased by 1.49 %, 2.72 %, 3.56 %, and 4.47 %, respectively, indicating that an increase in the filling rate of the insulation materials improved the insulation performance of the self-insulation wall. With the same increase in the filling rate of 25 %, the energy consumption of type (B-1) decreased by 8.66 KWh/m2, and the decrease range was the largest (i.e., by 7.65 %), indicating that Type (B-1) offered the best value for money in terms of energy savings and material costs. The EPS filling rate of Type (B-1) is 25 % and the thickness is 30 mm, which best meets the requirements of the economic thickness value of thermal insulation material (dEPS >= 27 mm), which also indicating that Type (B-1) can satisfy the comprehensive requirements of thermal insulation performance and cost savings in hot-summer and cold-winter climates, so Type (B-1) is the best filling scheme.
C1 [Hu, Wentao; Nickolaevich, Alekhin Vladimir; Xiao, Shuoting] Ural Fed Univ, Inst Civil Engn & Architecture, 19 Mira st, Ekaterinburg 620002, Russia.
   [Huang, Yue] Ural Fed Univ, Ural Inst Humanities, 51 Lenina st, Ekaterinburg 620002, Russia.
C3 Ural Federal University; Ural Federal University
RP Hu, WT; Nickolaevich, AV (corresponding author), Ural Fed Univ, Inst Civil Engn & Architecture, 19 Mira st, Ekaterinburg 620002, Russia.
EM huwentaogood@163.com; v.n.alekhin@urfu.ru
RI Huang, Yue/LRU-6769-2024; Xiao, Shuoting/HCH-4506-2022; Hu,
   Wentao/HGD-0217-2022
OI Huang, Yue/0009-0008-7244-8193; Hu, Wentao/0000-0003-3403-1289
FU China Scholarship Council; GRANT scholarship of Ural Federal University
FX Thank you for the support of the China Scholarship Council and the GRANT
   scholarship of Ural Federal University.
CR Anter AG, 2023, J ENERGY STORAGE, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.est.2023.107568
   Arregi B, 2020, ENERG BUILDINGS, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109846
   Awoyera PO, 2022, J BUILD ENG, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104568
   Bachir A, 2023, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V367, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130336
   Cdb P, 2022, Global status report for buildings and construction 2022
   Dlimi M., 2023, E PRIME ADV ELECT EN, V3, DOI [10.1016/j.prime.2023.100124, DOI 10.1016/J.PRIME.2023.100124]
   Harb E, 2023, CASE STUD CONSTR MAT, V18, DOI 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e01851
   Hou CP, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16072921
   Hu WT, 2023, APPL ENERG, V344, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121268
   Hu WT, 2022, CASE STUD THERM ENG, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.csite.2022.102148
   Hu WT, 2021, CASE STUD THERM ENG, V26, DOI 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101023
   Ishtiaque A, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V303, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114246
   Joo NY, 2023, ENERG BUILDINGS, V296, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113350
   Khoukhi M, 2021, CASE STUD THERM ENG, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.csite.2021.100917
   Li X, 2023, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V174, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2022.113137
   Liu C., 2019, Building energy conservation, V47, P56
   Liu ZA, 2022, CASE STUD THERM ENG, V31, DOI 10.1016/j.csite.2022.101844
   Ma L., 2022, N. Build. Mater., V11, P146
   Martin-Garin Alexander, 2023, Building Engineering Facing the Challenges of the 21st Century: Holistic Study from the Perspectives of Materials, Construction, Energy and Sustainability. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering (345), P417, DOI 10.1007/978-981-99-2714-2_23
   Meng X, 2018, CASE STUD THERM ENG, V12, P608, DOI 10.1016/j.csite.2018.08.003
   Meng X, 2018, CASE STUD CONSTR MAT, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.cscm.2018.e00188
   Nardi I, 2023, ENERGIES, V16, DOI 10.3390/en16083319
   Prasittisopin L, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V366, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132919
   Ravula R, 2023, J BUILD ENG, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107374
   Sakiyama NRM, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V202, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108004
   Wang HT, 2023, SUSTAIN ENERGY TECHN, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102937
   Wang T., 2020, J METEOROLOGICAL SCI, V40, P752
   Xie XD, 2022, CASE STUD CONSTR MAT, V16, DOI 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01047
   Yoo J, 2021, CASE STUD THERM ENG, V24, DOI 10.1016/j.csite.2021.100846
   Zhao JC, 2022, EUR POLYM J, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111261
NR 30
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 4
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2214-5095
J9 CASE STUD CONSTR MAT
JI Case Stud. Constr. Mater.
PD JUL
PY 2024
VL 20
AR e03256
DI 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03256
EA MAY 2024
PG 12
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil; Materials
   Science, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering; Materials Science
GA TI7Q1
UT WOS:001240704800001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Beever, EA
   Wilkening, JL
   Billman, PD
   Thurman, LL
   Ernest, KA
   Wright, DH
   Gill, AM
   Craighead, AC
   Helmstetter, NA
   Svancara, LK
   Cam, MJ
   Bhattacharyya, S
   Fitzgerald, J
   Hirose, JMR
   Westover, ML
   Gerraty, FD
   Klingler, KB
   Schmidts, DA
   Ryals, DK
   Brown, RN
   Clark, SL
   Clayton, N
   Collins, GH
   Cutting, KA
   Doak, DF
   Epps, CW
   Foley, JE
   French, J
   Hayes, CL
   Mills, ZA
   Moyer-Horner, L
   Nichols, LB
   Orlofsky, KB
   Peacock, MM
   Penzel, NC
   Peterson, J
   Ramsay, N
   Rickman, T
   Robinson, MM
   Robison, HL
   Rowe, KMC
   Rowe, KC
   Russello, MA
   Smith, AB
   Stewart, JAE
   Thompson, WW
   Thorne, JH
   Waterhouse, MD
   Weber, SS
   Wilson, KC
AF Beever, Erik A.
   Wilkening, Jennifer L.
   Billman, Peter D.
   Thurman, Lindsey L.
   Ernest, Kristina A.
   Wright, David H.
   Gill, Alisha M.
   Craighead, April C.
   Helmstetter, Nolan A.
   Svancara, Leona K.
   Cam, Meghan J.
   Bhattacharyya, Sabuj
   Fitzgerald, Jedediah
   Hirose, Jocelyn M. R.
   Westover, Marie L.
   Gerraty, Francis D.
   Klingler, Kelly B.
   Schmidts, Danielle A.
   Ryals, Dylan K.
   Brown, Richard N.
   Clark, Steven L.
   Clayton, Neil
   Collins, Gail H.
   Cutting, Kyle A.
   Doak, Daniel F.
   Epps, Clinton W.
   Foley, Janet E.
   French, Johnnie
   Hayes, Charles L.
   Mills, Zachary A.
   Moyer-Horner, Lucas
   Nichols, Lyle B.
   Orlofsky, Kate B.
   Peacock, Mary M.
   Penzel, Nicholas C.
   Peterson, Johnny
   Ramsay, Nathan
   Rickman, Tom
   Robinson, Megan M.
   Robison, Hillary L.
   Rowe, Karen M. C.
   Rowe, Kevin C.
   Russello, Michael A.
   Smith, Adam B.
   Stewart, Joseph A. E.
   Thompson, Will W.
   Thorne, James H.
   Waterhouse, Matthew D.
   Weber, Shana S.
   Wilson, Kenneth C.
TI Geographic and taxonomic variation in adaptive capacity among
   mountain-dwelling small mammals: Implications for conservation status
   and actions
SO BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptive capacity assessments; Climate-change vulnerability;
   Conservation status; Climate-adaptation mechanisms; Taxonomic levels
ID PIKA OCHOTONA-PRINCEPS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; AMERICAN PIKA; GREAT-BASIN;
   BIODIVERSITY; DEMOGRAPHY; MODELS
AB Contemporary climate change is modifying the distribution, morphology, phenology, physiology, evolution, and interspecific interactions of species. Effects of climate change are mediated not only through the magnitude of change experienced (exposure) and an animal's sensitivity to such changes, but also through the ability of the population or species to adjust to climatic variability and change genetically, behaviorally, or spatially (via its distribution) (i.e., adaptive capacity; AC). Here, we used an attribute-based framework to systematically evaluate and compare the AC of American pikas (Ochotona princeps) against four other mountain-dwelling small mammals of North America to determine whether pikas are disproportionately vulnerable to climate change, as has been postulated. Unlike previous analyses, we also compared AC across O. princeps lineages and across three taxo-nomic (and thus, spatial) scales. Our results indicate that pikas have markedly lower adaptive capacity than all compared species except bushy-tailed woodrats (Neotoma cinerea), and that our assessments of species generally align with earlier characterizations of climate-change vulnerability based on life-history characteristics. Although AC did not differ dramatically among pika lineages, some attributes are likely constraining AC differently in various parts of the geographic range. Comparisons across taxonomic levels of pikas illustrated that, although AC levels were comparable in pika lineages versus range-wide, AC was assessed as lower in interior-Great-Basin pikas than across the entire O.p. schisticeps lineage. We conclude that the comparatively lower AC of pikas results in particularly high susceptibility to anthropogenic climate change, corroborating results from numerous other recent investigations of pikas' climate-responsiveness. Adaptive-capacity evalua-tions appear useful as a consistent way to identify sentinel species or populations and for conservation prioritization.
C1 [Beever, Erik A.; Ryals, Dylan K.] US Geol Survey, Northern Rocky Mt Sci Ctr, Bozeman, MT 59715 USA.
   [Beever, Erik A.; Thompson, Will W.] Montana State Univ, Dept Ecol, Bozeman, MT USA.
   [Wilkening, Jennifer L.] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Natl Wildlife Refuge Syst, Nat Resource Program Ctr, Ft Collins, CO USA.
   [Billman, Peter D.] Univ Connecticut, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Storrs, CT USA.
   [Thurman, Lindsey L.] US Geol Survey, NW Climate Adaptat Sci Ctr, Corvallis, OR USA.
   [Ernest, Kristina A.] Cent Washington Univ, Ellensburg, WA USA.
   [Wright, David H.] Calif Dept Fish & Wildlife, Sacramento, CA USA.
   [Craighead, April C.] Craighead Inst, Bozeman, MT USA.
   [Helmstetter, Nolan A.] Univ Idaho, Dept Fish & Wildlife Sci, Idaho Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Moscow, ID USA.
   Idaho Dept Fish & Game, Moscow, ID USA.
   [Cam, Meghan J.] Washington State Univ, Sch Environm, Pullman, WA USA.
   [Bhattacharyya, Sabuj] Inst Stem Cell Sci & Regenerat Med, Bangalore, KA, India.
   Parks Canada, Yoho & Kootenay Natl Pk, Lake Louise, AB, Canada.
   [Westover, Marie L.] Los Rios Community Coll Dist, Sacramento, CA USA.
   [Gerraty, Francis D.] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA USA.
   [Klingler, Kelly B.] Univ Massachusetts, Amherst, MA USA.
   [Schmidts, Danielle A.; Hayes, Charles L.; Russello, Michael A.; Waterhouse, Matthew D.] Univ British Columbia, Dept Biol, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
   [Brown, Richard N.] Cal Poly Humboldt, Arcata, CA USA.
   [Clark, Steven L.] Clark Coll, Vancouver, WA USA.
   [Clayton, Neil] Univ Maine, Sch Forest Resources, Orono, ME USA.
   [Collins, Gail H.] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Viola, ID USA.
   [Cutting, Kyle A.] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Red Rock Lakes Natl Wildlife Refuge, Lima, MT USA.
   [Doak, Daniel F.] Univ Colorado, Dept Environm Studies, Boulder, CO USA.
   [Epps, Clinton W.] Oregon State Univ, Dept Fisheries Wildlife & Conservat Sci, Corvallis, OR USA.
   [Foley, Janet E.] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Davis, CA USA.
   [French, Johnnie] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Natl Fish & Wildlife Forens Lab, Ashland, OR USA.
   [Hayes, Charles L.] Univ New Mexico, Dept Biol, Albuquerque, NM USA.
   [Mills, Zachary A.] Milwaukee Cty Zoo, Milwaukee, WI USA.
   [Moyer-Horner, Lucas] Univ Utah, Sch Biol Sci, Salt Lake City, UT USA.
   [Nichols, Lyle B.] Santa Monica Coll, Dept Life Sci, Santa Monica, CA USA.
   [Orlofsky, Kate B.] Natl Pk Serv, Denali Natl Pk & Preserve, Denali National Pk, AK USA.
   [Peacock, Mary M.] Univ Nevada, Reno, NV USA.
   [Penzel, Nicholas C.] Colorado Coll, Colorado Springs, CO USA.
   [Peterson, Johnny] US Army, Hawthorne Army Depot, Hawthorne, NV USA.
   [Ramsay, Nathan] US Geol Survey, Natl Wildlife Hlth Ctr, Madison, WI USA.
   [Rickman, Tom] US Forest Serv, Lassen Natl Forest, Susanville, CA USA.
   [Robinson, Megan M.] Univ Zurich, Dept Evolutionary Biol & Environm Studies, Zurich, Switzerland.
   [Robison, Hillary L.] Natl Pk Serv, Yellowstone Natl Pk, WY USA.
   [Rowe, Karen M. C.; Rowe, Kevin C.] Museums Victoria, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
   [Smith, Adam B.] Missouri Bot Garden, St Louis, MO USA.
   [Stewart, Joseph A. E.; Thorne, James H.] Univ Calif, Dept, Environm Sci & Policy, Davis, CA USA.
   [Waterhouse, Matthew D.] Coll Sequoias, Visalia, CA USA.
   [Weber, Shana S.] Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ USA.
   [Hirose, Jocelyn M. R.] Parks Canada Agcy, Box 213, Lake Louise, AB T0L IE0, Canada.
   [Ryals, Dylan K.] Purdue Univ, Dept Entomol, W Lafayette, IN USA.
   [Cutting, Kyle A.] Natl Pk Serv, Wrangell St Elias Natl Pk Preserve,POB 439 Mile, Copper Ctr, AK 99573 USA.
   [Hayes, Charles L.] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, New Mexico Ecol Serv Field Off, Albuquerque, NM 87113 USA.
C3 United States Department of the Interior; United States Geological
   Survey; Montana State University System; Montana State University
   Bozeman; United States Department of the Interior; US Fish & Wildlife
   Service; University of Connecticut; United States Department of the
   Interior; United States Geological Survey; Central Washington
   University; University of Idaho; Washington State University; Department
   of Biotechnology (DBT) India; Institute for Stem Cell Biology &
   Regenerative Medicine - inStem; Parks Canada; University of California
   System; University of California Santa Cruz; University of Massachusetts
   System; University of Massachusetts Amherst; University of British
   Columbia; University of Maine System; University of Maine Orono; United
   States Department of the Interior; US Fish & Wildlife Service; United
   States Department of the Interior; US Fish & Wildlife Service;
   University of Colorado System; University of Colorado Boulder; Oregon
   State University; University of California System; University of
   California Davis; United States Department of the Interior; US Fish &
   Wildlife Service; University of New Mexico; Utah System of Higher
   Education; University of Utah; Santa Monica College; United States
   Department of the Interior; Nevada System of Higher Education (NSHE);
   University of Nevada Reno; Colorado College; United States Department of
   the Interior; United States Geological Survey; United States Department
   of Agriculture (USDA); United States Forest Service; University of
   Zurich; United States Department of the Interior; Missouri Botanical
   Gardens; University of California System; University of California
   Davis; Princeton University; Parks Canada; Purdue University System;
   Purdue University; United States Department of the Interior; United
   States Department of the Interior; US Fish & Wildlife Service
RP Beever, EA (corresponding author), US Geol Survey, Northern Rocky Mt Sci Ctr, 2327 Univ Ave,Ste 2, Bozeman, MT 59715 USA.
EM ebeever@usgs.gov; jennifer_wilkening@fws.gov; peter.billman@uconn.edu;
   lthurman@usgs.gov; ernestk@cwu.edu; alisha.gill@noaa.gov;
   april@craigheadinstitute.org; nolanH@uidaho.edu;
   leona.svancara@idfg.idaho.gov; meghan.camp@wsu.edu;
   SabujB@instem.res.in; jocelyn.hirose@gc.pc.ca;
   mariewestover@losrios.edu; fgerraty@ucsc.edu; kklingler@umass.edu;
   danielle.schmidt@ubc.ca; dryals@purdue.edu; richard.brown@humboldt.edu;
   sclark@clark.edu; neil.clayton@maine.edu; gail.h.collins@gmail.com;
   Kyle_Cutting@nps.gov; Daniel.Doak@colorado.edu;
   Clinton.Epps@oregonstate.edu; jefoley@ucdavis.edu;
   Johnnie_French@fws.gov; clhayes@unm.edu; mills.zach.a@gmail.com;
   LRMHorner@gmail.com; nichols_lyle@smc.edu; kate_orlofsky@nps.gov;
   mpeacock@unr.edu; N_Penzel@ColoradoCollege.edu;
   yasmargNahtan@outlook.com; tom.rickman@usda.gov;
   MeganMote.Robinson@uzh.ch; Hillary_Robison@nps.gov;
   karowe@museum.vic.gov.au; michael.russello@ubc.ca; adam.smith@mobot.org;
   JoeStewart@UCDavis.edu; JHThorne@ucdavis.edu; ShanaW@Princeton.edu
RI Rowe, Karen/H-5897-2019; Smith, Adam/H-6906-2019; Billman,
   Peter/KVB-9220-2024; Gill, Alisha/KRP-3793-2024; Epps,
   Clinton/AAX-3971-2021; bhattacharyya, Sabuj/AAC-9799-2020; Stewart,
   Joseph/AAA-4647-2020; Thurman, Lindsey/AAF-7056-2020; Schmidt,
   Danielle/AAV-5621-2021
OI Helmstetter, Nolan/0000-0002-3173-5443; Epps,
   Clinton/0000-0001-6577-1840; Gill, Alisha/0000-0002-8751-835X; Thurman,
   Lindsey/0000-0003-3142-4909; Bhattacharyya, Sabuj/0000-0002-4335-0751;
   Svancara, Leona/0009-0007-1936-6079; Wilkening,
   Nifer/0000-0001-8748-4578; Beever, Erik/0000-0002-9369-486X; Billman,
   Peter/0000-0002-4072-4965; Rowe, Karen/0000-0002-6131-6418; Gerraty,
   Francis (Frankie)/0000-0001-9989-4953
CR Angeler DG, 2019, ADV ECOL RES, V60, P1, DOI 10.1016/bs.aecr.2019.02.001
   Beever E.A., 2011, ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUEN, P285
   Beever E.A., 2019, Introduction: Defining and Interpreting Ecological Disturbances, P3
   Beever EA, 2017, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V15, P299, DOI 10.1002/fee.1502
   Beever EA, 2016, J MAMMAL, V97, P1495, DOI 10.1093/jmammal/gyw128
   Beever EA, 2016, CONSERV LETT, V9, P131, DOI 10.1111/conl.12190
   Beever EA, 2013, ECOLOGY, V94, P1563, DOI 10.1890/12-2174.1
   Beever EA, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2054, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02389.x
   Billman PD, 2021, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V27, P4498, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15793
   Castillo JA, 2016, ECOL APPL, V26, P1660, DOI 10.1890/15-1452.1
   Conover W., 1980, Practical nonparametric statistics John Wiley Sons, P493
   Conroy MJ, 2011, BIOL CONSERV, V144, P1204, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.019
   Dawson TP, 2011, SCIENCE, V332, P53, DOI 10.1126/science.1200303
   Des Roches S, 2018, NAT ECOL EVOL, V2, P57, DOI 10.1038/s41559-017-0402-5
   Edmunds PJ, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-10478-4
   Foden WB, 2019, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V10, DOI 10.1002/wcc.551
   Foden WB, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0065427
   Galbreath KE, 2009, EVOLUTION, V63, P2848, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00803.x
   Grayson DK, 2005, J BIOGEOGR, V32, P2103, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01341.x
   HAFNER DJ, 1994, ARCTIC ALPINE RES, V26, P375, DOI 10.2307/1551799
   Hall LE, 2019, J ANIM ECOL, V88, P363, DOI 10.1111/1365-2656.12925
   Hamann E, 2021, PLANT SCI, V304, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110737
   Hanski I, 1998, NATURE, V396, P41, DOI 10.1038/23876
   Ikeda DH, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P164, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13470
   Jeffress MR, 2017, WEST N AM NATURALIST, V77, P252, DOI 10.3398/064.077.0213
   Jeffress MR, 2013, ECOL APPL, V23, P864, DOI 10.1890/12-0979.1
   Johnston AN, 2019, ECOLOGY, V100, DOI 10.1002/ecy.2638
   Kearney M, 2009, ECOL LETT, V12, P334, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01277.x
   Kreuzer MP, 2003, OECOLOGIA, V134, P343, DOI 10.1007/s00442-002-1145-8
   LeDee OE, 2021, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V85, P7, DOI 10.1002/jwmg.21969
   Lynch AJ, 2021, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V19, P461, DOI 10.1002/fee.2377
   MACARTHUR RA, 1973, CAN J ZOOL, V51, P11, DOI 10.1139/z73-002
   MacLean SA, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P4094, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13736
   Mathewson PD, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P1048, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13454
   McCain CM, 2019, J MAMMAL, V100, P1808, DOI 10.1093/jmammal/gyz155
   MCDONALD KA, 1992, CONSERV BIOL, V6, P409, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06030409.x
   Millar CI, 2022, ECOL EVOL, V12, DOI 10.1002/ece3.9295
   Millar CI, 2018, ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES, V50, DOI 10.1080/15230430.2018.1436296
   Millar CI, 2010, ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES, V42, P76, DOI 10.1657/1938-4246-42.1.76
   Nichols LB, 2016, WEST N AM NATURALIST, V76, P163, DOI 10.3398/064.076.0203
   Nicotra AB, 2015, CONSERV BIOL, V29, P1268, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12522
   Nolan C, 2018, SCIENCE, V361, P920, DOI 10.1126/science.aan5360
   Pacifici M, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P215, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2448
   Quintero I, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P1095, DOI 10.1111/ele.12144
   Rapacciuolo G, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P2841, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12638
   Rumpf SB, 2019, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V28, P533, DOI 10.1111/geb.12865
   Schindler DE, 2010, NATURE, V465, P609, DOI 10.1038/nature09060
   Schwalm D, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P1572, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13189
   Smith AB, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P787, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0584-8
   Smith AT, 2020, J MAMMAL, V101, P1466, DOI 10.1093/jmammal/gyaa110
   SMITH AT, 1974, ECOLOGY, V55, P1368, DOI 10.2307/1935464
   Staudinger MD, 2013, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V11, P465, DOI 10.1890/120272
   Stewart JE, 2020, ECOLOGY, V101, DOI 10.1002/ecy.2906
   Stewart JAE, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0181834
   Stewart JAE, 2015, J BIOGEOGR, V42, P880, DOI 10.1111/jbi.12466
   Thurman LL, 2022, CONSERV BIOL, V36, DOI 10.1111/cobi.13838
   Thurman LL, 2020, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V18, P520, DOI 10.1002/fee.2253
   Varner J, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0104648
   Violle C, 2012, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V27, P244, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.014
   Westover M.L., 2019, DISSERTATION, P120
   WIENS JA, 1989, FUNCT ECOL, V3, P385, DOI 10.2307/2389612
   Wilkening JL, 2019, ECOSPHERE, V10, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2764
   Wilkening JL, 2011, QUATERN INT, V235, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.05.004
NR 63
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 2
U2 11
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0006-3207
EI 1873-2917
J9 BIOL CONSERV
JI Biol. Conserv.
PD JUN
PY 2023
VL 282
AR 109942
DI 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109942
EA APR 2023
PG 11
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA M6KN9
UT WOS:001031286600001
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU van den Hoven, K
   Kroeze, C
   van Loon-Steensma, JM
AF van den Hoven, Kim
   Kroeze, Carolien
   van Loon-Steensma, Jantsje M.
TI Characteristics of realigned dikes in coastal Europe: Overview and
   opportunities for nature-based flood protection
SO OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Managed realignment; Nature-based flood defence system; Realigned dike
   groups; Climate adaptation; Saltmarsh restoration
ID MANAGED REALIGNMENT; SALT-MARSH; INTERTIDAL HABITATS; HUMBER ESTUARY;
   SEA; RESTORATION; ATTENUATION; ADAPTATION; DEFENSES; EMBANKMENTS
AB Managed realignment is the landward relocation of flood infrastructure to re-establish tidal exchange on formerly reclaimed land. Managed realignment can be seen as a nature-based flood defence system that combines flood protection by the realigned dike (artificial) and restored saltmarshes (nature-based). So far, research on coastal managed realignment is primarily directed to saltmarsh restoration on formerly reclaimed land. This study focuses on the realigned dikes. The aim of this research is to characterize realigned dikes and to indicate the characteristics that offer opportunities for nature-based flood protection. We categorized 90 European coastal managed realignment projects into two realigned dike groups: (1) Newly built landward dikes and (2) Existing landward dikes of former multiple dike systems. The second group has two subcategories: (2a) Former hinterland dikes and (2b) Realignments within summer polders. For each group we present the realigned dike characteristics of a representative case study. We consider that the use of existing landward dikes or local construction material make realignment more sustainable. From a nature-based flood protection perspective, the presence of an artificial dike is ambiguous. Our results show that targeted and expected saltmarsh restoration at managed realignment does not necessarily result in a greener realigned dike design that suits for combined flood protection with restored saltmarshes. We recommend coastal managers to explicitly take combined flood protection into account in the realigned dike design and steer the topography of the realignment site to facilitate naturebased flood protection and promote surface elevation increase seaward of the realigned dike in response to sea level rise. This makes managed realignment a nature-based flood defence zone for now and for the future.
C1 [van den Hoven, Kim; Kroeze, Carolien; van Loon-Steensma, Jantsje M.] Wageningen Univ, Water Syst & Global Change Grp, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands.
C3 Wageningen University & Research
RP van den Hoven, K (corresponding author), Wageningen Univ, Water Syst & Global Change Grp, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands.
EM kim.vandenhoven@wur.nl
RI Kroeze, Carolien/C-6938-2014
OI van Loon-Steensma, Jantsje M./0000-0002-6181-7829; van den Hoven,
   Kim/0000-0001-9046-1385
FU Dutch Research Council (NWO) [17589]
FX This publication is part of the project The Hedwige-Prosper Polder as a
   future-oriented experiment in managed realignment: integrating
   saltmarshes in water safety (with project number 17589) of the research
   programme 'Living Labs in the Dutch Delta' which is (partly) financed by
   the Dutch Research Council (NWO).
CR Abel N, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.002
   Abrahamse J., 1997, NOORDERBREEDTE, V21, P2
   Allen JRL, 2000, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V19, P1155, DOI 10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00034-7
   Bakker J. P., 2001, Levende Natuur, V102, P19
   Bakker R., 2014, 11 PUCCIMAR ALT WYM
   Barbier EB, 2011, ECOL MONOGR, V81, P169, DOI 10.1890/10-1510.1
   Barkowski J. W., 2009, Journal of Coastal Conservation, V13, P185, DOI 10.1007/s11852-009-0053-z
   Battjes JA, 2000, COAST ENG, V40, P161, DOI 10.1016/S0378-3839(00)00007-7
   Bawedin V., 2004, CAH NANTAIS IGARUN, V61, P11
   Bernhardt KG, 2003, BASIC APPL ECOL, V4, P441, DOI 10.1078/1439-1791-00180
   Bouma TJ, 2014, COAST ENG, V87, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2013.11.014
   Bridges TS., 2021, International Guidelines on Natural and Nature-Based Features for Flood Risk Management
   Buser M, 2020, PLAN PRACT RES, V35, P127, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2019.1696145
   Chang ER, 2016, APPL VEG SCI, V19, P66, DOI 10.1111/avsc.12195
   Chang YH, 2001, MAR POLLUT BULL, V42, P470, DOI 10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00186-7
   CIRIA, 2013, RP957 CIRIA, P1332
   Cox TJS, 2006, ECOL ENG, V28, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.04.001
   Dale J, 2018, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V215, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2018.10.007
   Dausse A, 2005, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V64, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2005.02.023
   De Beukelaer-Dossche M., 2013, BERGENMEERSEN CONSTR, P11
   De La Vega-Leinert A.C., 2015, GREIFSWALDER GEOGRAP, V51
   de la Vega-Leinert AC, 2018, J COASTAL RES, V34, P586, DOI 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-15-00217.1
   De Leeuw C., 2003, RIKZ2003010
   De Mesel I., 2013, Rapport C072/13
   DEFRA & Environment Agency, 2002, MAN REAL REV
   Degroof J, 1992, INFRASTRUCTUUR LEEFM, V4, P223
   Dewan C, 2015, WATER INT, V40, P401, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2015.1025196
   Dixon A.M., 1998, J CHART I WATER ENV, V12
   EA, 2013, RP032E2013 EA SHOR M
   EA, 2011, GREATH MAN REAL ENV
   Eertman RHM, 2002, RESTOR ECOL, V10, P438, DOI 10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002.01034.x
   Elliot S, 2015, COASTAL REALIGNMENT
   Esselink P., 2015, 06 PUCC ALT WYM EC O
   Esteves L.S., 2014, Managed Realignment : A Viable Long- Term Coastal Management Strategy?, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9029-1_1, 10.1007/978-94-017-9029-1, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9029-1]
   Esteves L. S., 2014, MANAGED REALIGNMENT, P33, DOI [10.1007/978-94-017-9029-1_3, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9029-1_3]
   Esteves L.S., 2014, WHAT IS MANAGED REAL, P19
   European Commission, 2021, COM202182FIN
   Fairchild TP, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac0c45
   Fenger J, 2008, J COASTAL RES, V24, P394, DOI [10.2112/07A-0012.1, 10.2112/107A-0012.1]
   Feretti L, 2016, SUFFOLKS CHANING COA
   French PW, 2006, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V67, P409, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2005.11.035
   Garbutt RA, 2006, MAR POLLUT BULL, V53, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.09.015
   Gedan KB, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V106, P7, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-0003-7
   Goeldner-Gianella L., 2007, Annales de geographic, V656, P339, DOI DOI 10.3917/AG.656.0339
   Goeldner-Gianella L, 2007, J COASTAL RES, V23, P1218, DOI 10.2112/04-0416R.1
   Goeldner-Gianella L, 2015, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V116, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.07.001
   Guthrie, 2009, NORTHUMBERLAND N TYN, V2
   Higuchi T., 2014, SEA SHORE M CHALLENG, P888
   Hinkel J, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3292, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1222469111
   Hoffmann Maurice, 2004, Levende Natuur, V105, P188
   Hofstede JLA, 2019, J COAST CONSERV, V23, P1069, DOI 10.1007/s11852-019-00714-x
   Holz R., 1996, NATUR NATURSCHUTZ ME, V23, P3
   Hughes RG, 2009, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V384, P13, DOI 10.3354/meps08027
   Kiesel J, 2020, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V242, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106844
   Kiesel J, 2019, ECOL ENG, V136, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.06.009
   Kirwan ML, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P253, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2909
   Le Hir P, 2000, CONT SHELF RES, V20, P1433, DOI 10.1016/S0278-4343(00)00031-5
   Liu ZZ, 2021, COMMUN EARTH ENVIRON, V2, DOI 10.1038/s43247-021-00117-7
   MacDonald MA, 2020, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.09.007
   MAI S, 2002, DIKED FORELANDS THEI
   Marijnissen R, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V739, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139698
   Marijnissen RJC, 2021, COAST ENG, V167, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2021.103903
   Marquiegui MA, 2009, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V84, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.08.001
   Mazik K, 2007, MAR POLLUT BULL, V55, P564, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.09.017
   Möller I, 2014, NAT GEOSCI, V7, P727, DOI [10.1038/ngeo2251, 10.1038/NGEO2251]
   Möller I, 2001, J CHART INST WATER E, V15, P109
   Morris R, 2011, EVALUATION RIVER ENG
   Morris RKA, 2013, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V73, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.12.013
   Mossman HL, 2012, J APPL ECOL, V49, P1446, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02198.x
   Nature English., 1994, 4 U HULL I EST COAST
   Nicholls RJ, 2018, PHILOS T R SOC A, V376, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2016.0448
   Oosterlee L, 2020, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106428
   Oppenheimer M., IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, DOI [10.1017/9781009157964.006, DOI 10.1017/9781009157964.006, DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.AAM6284]
   Piesschaert F., 2008, 29 INBO IR
   Pontee NI, 2019, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V172, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.01.017
   Pontee N, 2013, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V84, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.07.010
   Reed D, 2018, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V213, P269, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2018.08.017
   Rupp-Armstrong S, 2007, J COASTAL RES, V23, P1418, DOI 10.2112/04-0426.1
   RWS Centrale Informatievoorziening, 2013, KENM WAARD GET 2011
   Rycke A. de, 2004, Journal of Water and Land Development, P35
   Saathoff S., 2012, MEASURE, V28, P13
   Schernewski G, 2019, J COAST CONSERV, V23, P899, DOI 10.1007/s11852-017-0587-4
   Schoonees T, 2019, ESTUAR COAST, V42, P1709, DOI 10.1007/s12237-019-00551-z
   Schuerch M, 2018, NATURE, V561, P231, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0476-5
   Scoones I, 2007, DEV PRACT, V17, P589, DOI 10.1080/09614520701469609
   Shepard CC, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0027374
   Smolders S, 2015, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V15, P1659, DOI 10.5194/nhess-15-1659-2015
   Soresma, 2013, ONTW INT HEDW PROSP
   Stark J, 2015, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V60, P1371, DOI 10.1002/lno.10104
   Symonds AM, 2007, J COASTAL RES, P130
   Syvitski JPM, 2009, NAT GEOSCI, V2, P681, DOI 10.1038/NGEO629
   Temmerman S, 2013, NATURE, V504, P79, DOI 10.1038/nature12859
   Townend IH, 2008, P I CIVIL ENG-MAR EN, V161, P9, DOI 10.1680/maen.2008.161.1.9
   Van Braeckel A., 2019, MONEOS MONITORINGSOV, DOI [10.21436/inbor.16703072, DOI 10.21436/INBOR.16703072]
   van de Lageweg WI., 2019, PERKPOLDER TIDAL RES
   Van den Bergh E., 2004, A2004105 AWZ AFDELIN
   Van den Bergh E., 2005, ONTPOLDERING HERTOGI, P1114
   Van den Bergh E., 2005, P DUN EST 2005 INT C, P521
   Van den Hoven K., 2021, IN PRESS, DOI [10.3311/FLOODRisk2020.14.13, DOI 10.3311/FLOODRISK2020.14.13]
   Van der Ham W., 2009, Hollandse polders
   Van der Reijden I.M.H., 2019, EFFECTIVITEIT VEGETA
   Van Dort K.W., 1998, TOELICHTING BIJ VEGE
   van Duin W.E., 2007, Cyclisch Beheer Kwelderwerken Friesland: AW-Rapport
   Van Loon-Steensma J.M., 2017, WAGEN ENVIRON RES, DOI [10.18174/412209, DOI 10.18174/412209]
   Van Loon-Steensma J.M., 2013, 2437 ALT, P1566
   van Loon-Steensma JM, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V63, P528, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.002
   Van Loon-Steensma JM, 2016, E3S WEB CONF, V7, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/20160713003
   van Loon-Steensma JM, 2014, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V44, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.06.009
   Van Oevelen D., 2000, LIT NAAR ONTPOLDERIN, V2000, P7
   Van Ryckegem G., 2013, INBOR201326 MONEOS
   Van Ryckegem G., 2014, MONEOS GEINTEGREERD
   van Staveren MF, 2017, WATER POLICY, V19, P147, DOI 10.2166/wp.2016.029
   van Wesenbeeck BK, 2014, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V140, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2013.12.031
   Vandenbruwaene W., 2021, PA04710 WL
   Vousdoukas MI, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-15665-3
   Vuik V, 2016, COAST ENG, V116, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.06.001
   Vuik V, 2019, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V171, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.01.010
   Waterloopkundig Laboratorium, 1984, VERSL BUIT GROEN DIJ
   Wheeler D., 2008, FLOODRISK 2008 THE E
   White A., 2015, THESIS U PLYMOUTH
   Willemsen PWJM, 2020, COAST ENG, V156, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.103628
   Winn PJS, 2003, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V314, P13, DOI 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00092-5
   Wolters M, 2005, BIOL CONSERV, V123, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.11.013
   Zhu ZC, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P853, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-0556-z
NR 124
TC 13
Z9 13
U1 3
U2 30
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0964-5691
EI 1873-524X
J9 OCEAN COAST MANAGE
JI Ocean Coastal Manage.
PD MAY 1
PY 2022
VL 222
AR 106116
DI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106116
EA MAR 2022
PG 14
WC Oceanography; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Oceanography; Water Resources
GA 1C7IF
UT WOS:000793287500002
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Qiu, JL
   Shen, ZY
   Hou, XS
   Xie, H
   Leng, GY
AF Qiu, Jiali
   Shen, Zhenyao
   Hou, Xiaoshu
   Xie, Hui
   Leng, Guoyong
TI Evaluating the performance of conservation practices under climate
   change scenarios in the Miyun Reservoir Watershed, China
SO ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
LA English
DT Article; Proceedings Paper
CT 12th International Congress of Ecology (INTECOL)
CY AUG 21-25, 2017
CL Beijing, PEOPLES R CHINA
DE Climate change; SWAT; Best Management Practices; BMP efficiency; BMP
   optimization; Miyun Reservoir Watershed
ID NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION; LONG-TERM VARIATIONS; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES;
   CHANGE IMPACTS; LAND-USE; PRACTICE IMPLEMENTATION; REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS;
   COST-EFFECTIVENESS; RIVER-BASIN; QUALITY
AB Climate change is one of the major challenges in watershed management systems. Rising air temperatures, increasing precipitation in winter, and decreasing precipitation in summer as well as increases in extreme weather events have increased flooding and droughts and further affected water quality in the Miyun Reservoir Watershed (MRW). This study used the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model with five downscaled general circulation models (GCMs) to quantify the impact of climate change on hydrology, soil erosion, nutrient cycling, and the performance of Best Management Practices (BMPs) at watershed scale, driven by RCPs 2.6, 4.5, and 8.5. Compared with the baseline scenario, the results indicated that climate variability, especially precipitation and temperature, had great effects on surface runoff, sediment yields, and nutrient losses and further significantly affected BMP efficiency, although the magnitudes of change differed among the RCPs. Monthly sediment and nutrient loads increased substantially in all climate change scenarios, especially in flood season, due to the increase in precipitation intensity. Although BMPs were identified to be not appreciably effective in controlling water balance, they were effective in reducing sediment and nutrient losses. Based on this case, a simulation-optimization framework was applied to develop future watershed management strategies with BMP configurations because of their climate adaptation benefits, water improvement targets, and economical cost. The results indicated that the discrepancy among different climate scenarios was reflected by the number and types of BMPs and their spatial distributions, especially structural BMPs. This study suggests that the increasing frequency of rainfall events may decrease the efficiency of BMPs in the MRW, and watershed management should be adjusted according to changing climate in the future.
C1 [Qiu, Jiali; Shen, Zhenyao; Hou, Xiaoshu; Xie, Hui] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Lab Water Environm Simulat, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China.
   [Leng, Guoyong] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Proc, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
C3 Beijing Normal University; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of
   Geographic Sciences & Natural Resources Research, CAS
RP Shen, ZY (corresponding author), Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Lab Water Environm Simulat, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China.
EM zyshen@bnu.edu.cn
OI Xie, Hui/0000-0002-8648-0177
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [51579011]; fund for
   Innovative Research Group of the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China [51721093]
FX This project was supported by the funds from the National Natural
   Science Foundation of China (No. 51579011) and the fund for Innovative
   Research Group of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.
   51721093).
CR Andrews H.O., 2005, P WATER ENV FED, V2005, P4886
   [Anonymous], 2013, AGU FALL M 2013
   Arnold JG, 1998, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V34, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
   Arnold JG., 2012, SOIL WATER ASSESSMEN
   Bao ZX, 2012, J HYDROL, V460, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.054
   Brouziyne Y, 2018, AGR SYST, V162, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.024
   Dudula J, 2016, J HYDROL, V541, P703, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.020
   Geng RZ, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V234, P1023, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.277
   Groffman PM, 2009, ECOSYSTEMS, V12, P927, DOI 10.1007/s10021-009-9268-y
   Hagemann S, 2013, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V4, P129, DOI 10.5194/esd-4-129-2013
   Hempel S, 2013, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V4, P219, DOI 10.5194/esd-4-219-2013
   Jalliffier-Verne I, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V508, P462, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.059
   Jeon DJ, 2018, ECOL ENG, V119, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.05.006
   Karamouz M, 2013, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V139, P520, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000345
   Khan SJ, 2015, WATER RES, V85, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.018
   Kim SB, 2015, PADDY WATER ENVIRON, V13, P557, DOI 10.1007/s10333-014-0471-x
   Klik A, 2010, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V148, P529, DOI 10.1017/S0021859610000158
   Lampe L.K., 2004, Post-Project Monitoring of BMP's/SUDS to determine Performance and Whole-Life Costs
   Legendre P, 1999, ECOL MONOGR, V69, P1, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0001:DBRATM]2.0.CO;2
   Leng GY, 2014, J HYDROMETEOROL, V15, P2085, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-13-0182.1
   Li DQ, 2016, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V188, DOI 10.1007/s10661-015-5048-7
   Li Z, 2018, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V132, P1029, DOI 10.1007/s00704-017-2123-8
   Li Z, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V548, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.002
   Mango LM, 2011, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V15, P2245, DOI 10.5194/hess-15-2245-2011
   Milly PCD, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P946, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3046, 10.1038/nclimate3046]
   Misra AK, 2015, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V29, P4849, DOI 10.1007/s11269-015-1094-8
   Pease LA, 2017, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V72, P240, DOI 10.2489/jswc.72.3.240
   Qiu JL, 2019, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V191, DOI 10.1007/s10661-019-7747-y
   Qiu JL, 2018, ECOL ENG, V123, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.08.020
   Qiu JL, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V25, P6514, DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-0946-6
   Rakib Z., 2017, International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, V12, P155, DOI 10.2495/SDP-V12-N1-155-164
   Rao C., 1973, LINEAR STAT INFERENC
   Renkenberger J, 2017, T ASABE, V60, P769, DOI 10.13031/trans.11691
   Renkenberger J, 2016, T ASABE, V59, P1803, DOI 10.13031/trans.59.11677
   Rousseau AN, 2013, CAN WATER RESOUR J, V38, P99, DOI 10.1080/07011784.2013.780792
   Schmalz B, 2015, ECOHYDROLOGY, V8, P1119, DOI 10.1002/eco.1569
   Shoemaker L., 2009, SUSTAIN - A Framework for Placement of Best Management Practices in Urban Watersheds to Protect Water Quality
   Sun Y, 2016, APPL GEOGR, V76, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.005
   Taylor SD, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V180, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.002
   Valcu-Lisman AM, 2017, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V72, P280, DOI 10.2489/jswc.72.3.280
   VANDENWOLLENBERG AL, 1977, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V42, P207, DOI 10.1007/BF02294050
   Wagena MB, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V635, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.110
   Waidler D., 2011, CONSERVATION PRACTIC
   Wallace CW, 2017, AGR WATER MANAGE, V186, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.02.014
   Walters KM, 2016, ECOL ENG, V89, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.014
   Warszawski L, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3228, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1312330110
   Woznicki SA, 2011, T ASABE, V54, P171
   Woznicki SA, 2012, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V48, P90, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00598.x
   Wu Q, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V609, P242, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.041
   Xia XH, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V523, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.140
   Xu W, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V25, P9071, DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-1092-x
   Xu ZX, 2009, HYDROL PROCESS, V23, P3619, DOI 10.1002/hyp.7475
   Yan TZ, 2019, ECOHYDROL HYDROBIOL, V19, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2018.09.001
   Zessner M, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V579, P1137, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.092
   Zheng JK, 2016, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V20, P1561, DOI [10.5194/hess-20-1561-2016, 10.5]
NR 55
TC 42
Z9 42
U1 16
U2 109
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29a, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0925-8574
EI 1872-6992
J9 ECOL ENG
JI Ecol. Eng.
PD JAN 15
PY 2020
VL 143
AR 105700
DI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.105700
PG 12
WC Ecology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Engineering
GA KA6UE
UT WOS:000505931400011
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Negoua, H
   Chakir, M
   David, JR
   Capy, P
AF Negoua, Hakim
   Chakir, Mohamed
   David, Jean R.
   Capy, Pierre
TI Climatic adaptation in <i>Drosophila</i>: phenotypic plasticity of
   morphological traits along a seasonal cycle
SO ANNALES DE LA SOCIETE ENTOMOLOGIQUE DE FRANCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Drosophila simulans; natural populations; reaction norms; plasticity;
   larval development
ID THORACIC TRIDENT PIGMENTATION; TEMPERATURE-SIZE RULE;
   NATURAL-POPULATIONS; GROWTH TEMPERATURE; ABDOMINAL PIGMENTATION;
   TROPICAL POPULATIONS; QUANTITATIVE TRAITS; GENETIC-VARIABILITY; REACTION
   NORMS; BODY-SIZE
AB Drosophila species often exhibit latitudinal clines for morphological traits, frequently interpreted as adaptations to local climates conditions, especially to temperature. While there are many works on climatic data and genetic variations, the precise effects of temperature in natural conditions are not known. Here, we investigated the phenotypic variations of wild collected Drosophila simulans adults over 12 successive months during which average air temperature varied from 14 to 30 degrees C. Three kinds of traits were measured each month on random samples of 50 flies from two sites and, as control, in laboratory cultures grown at several constant temperatures ranging for 12 to 31 degrees C. All traits exhibited major changes in their mean values. For size-related traits and abdomen pigmentation, a maximum was observed during the coldest months and a minimum in summer. For sternopleural bristles number, a reverse shape was observed with a maximum in July. The shapes of these curves match the shapes of the reaction norms observed under laboratory conditions. For size and pigmentation, mean values are negatively correlated to temperature, but the magnitude of the variation was far less important in nature than in the laboratory. We suggest that the air temperature is not a convenient indicator of the real developmental temperature in nature, especially for low temperatures. Our results show that thermal seasonal variations produce different phenotypes, which may be submitted to natural selection. However, temperature is not the only source of variation and nutritional effects on larvae play also an important role. The impact of temperature in nature is clearly less important than when investigated in the laboratory. Such a result should be considered in ecological genetic studies, especially when biological data are correlated with a diversity of abiotic climatic factors.
C1 [Negoua, Hakim; Chakir, Mohamed] Univ Cadi Ayyad, Fac Sci & Tech, Lab Aliment Environm & Sante, Marrakech, Morocco.
   [David, Jean R.] Sorbonne Univ, CNRS, Inst Systemat Evolut Biodiversite ISYEB, Museum Natl Hist Nat, Paris, France.
   [David, Jean R.; Capy, Pierre] Univ Paris Saclay, Univ Paris Sud, CNRS, Lab Evolut Genomes Comportement Ecol EGCE,IRD, Paris, France.
C3 Cadi Ayyad University of Marrakech; Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle
   (MNHN); Sorbonne Universite; Centre National de la Recherche
   Scientifique (CNRS); Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement (IRD);
   Universite Paris Saclay; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
   (CNRS)
RP Capy, P (corresponding author), Univ Paris Saclay, Univ Paris Sud, CNRS, Lab Evolut Genomes Comportement Ecol EGCE,IRD, Paris, France.
EM pierre.capy@u-psud.fr
FU CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
FX This work was supported by the CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche
   Scientifique).
CR Akhund-Zade J, 2017, J INSECT SCI, V17, DOI 10.1093/jisesa/iew094
   Andrewartha HG, 1964, SELECTIONS DISTRIBUT
   Angilletta MJ, 2009, BIO HABIT, P1, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570875.001.1
   Angilletta MJ, 2003, AM NAT, V162, P332
   Angilletta MJ, 2004, INTEGR COMP BIOL, V44, P498, DOI 10.1093/icb/44.6.498
   [Anonymous], 1971, Genetics of the Evolutionary Process
   [Anonymous], 1983, The genetics and biology of Drosophila
   ATKINSON D, 1994, ADV ECOL RES, V25, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60212-3
   ATKINSON D, 1995, J THERM BIOL, V20, P61, DOI 10.1016/0306-4565(94)00028-H
   ATKINSON WD, 1979, J ANIM ECOL, V48, P91, DOI 10.2307/4102
   Azevedo RBR, 1998, EVOLUTION, V52, P1353, DOI [10.2307/2411305, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02017.x]
   Bastide H, 2016, GENETICS, V204, P1307, DOI 10.1534/genetics.116.192492
   Bastide H, 2014, BMC EVOL BIOL, V14, DOI 10.1186/s12862-014-0179-y
   Bastide H, 2013, PLOS GENET, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003534
   Bergland AO, 2014, PLOS GENET, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004775
   Capy P, 2004, GENETICA, V120, P5, DOI 10.1023/B:GENE.0000017626.41548.97
   CAPY P, 1988, HEREDITY, V61, P263, DOI 10.1038/hdy.1988.114
   CAVICCHI S, 1985, GENETICS, V109, P665
   Chakir M, 2008, J GENET, V87, P373, DOI 10.1007/s12041-008-0060-0
   Chakir M, 2007, J THERM BIOL, V32, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2006.06.001
   Chakir M, 2002, J THERM BIOL, V27, P61, DOI 10.1016/S0306-4565(01)00016-X
   COYNE JA, 1987, GENETICS, V117, P727
   David J.R., 2004, Phenotypic plasticity: Functional and conceptual approaches
   David JR, 2006, J GENET, V85, P9, DOI 10.1007/BF02728965
   David JR, 2004, GENETICA, V120, P151, DOI 10.1023/B:GENE.0000017638.02813.5a
   DAVID JR, 1988, TRENDS GENET, V4, P106, DOI 10.1016/0168-9525(88)90098-4
   DAVID JR, 1990, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V3, P429, DOI 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1990.3050429.x
   Debat V, 2003, EVOLUTION, V57, P2773, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01519.x
   DELPUECH JM, 1995, EVOLUTION, V49, P670, DOI [10.2307/2410320, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02303.x]
   Endler L, 2016, GENETICS, V202, P843, DOI 10.1534/genetics.115.183376
   Gibert JM, 2016, PLOS GENET, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006218
   Gibert P, 1996, EVOLUTION, V50, P2346, DOI [10.2307/2410703, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03622.x]
   Gibert P, 2004, GENETICA, V120, P165, DOI 10.1023/B:GENE.0000017639.62427.8b
   Gibert P, 1998, HEREDITY, V80, P326, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00301.x
   Hoffmann A. A., 1997, EXTREME ENV CHANGE E
   Karan D, 2000, GENETICA, V108, P91, DOI 10.1023/A:1004090517967
   Moreteau B, 2003, GENET RES, V81, P25, DOI 10.1017/S0016672302005967
   MORETEAU B, 1995, ANN SOC ENTOMOL FR, V31, P249
   Munjal AK, 1997, GENET SEL EVOL, V29, P601, DOI 10.1051/gse:19970505
   Parkash R, 2009, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V55, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.01.008
   Petavy G, 1997, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V10, P875, DOI 10.1007/s000360050059
   Petavy G, 2001, J THERM BIOL, V26, P29, DOI 10.1016/S0306-4565(00)00022-X
   Rajpurohit S, 2016, BIOL LETTERS, V12, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0625
   ROUAULT J, 1982, ACTA OECOL-OEC GEN, V3, P331
   Schou MF, 2017, FUNCT ECOL, V31, P934, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12782
   STALKER HD, 1980, GENETICS, V95, P211
   STALKER HD, 1949, EVOLUTION, V3, P330, DOI 10.2307/2405719
   TANTAWY AO, 1964, EVOLUTION, V18, P560, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1964.tb01672.x
   Woods RE, 1998, EVOLUTION, V52, P816, DOI [10.2307/2411275, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb03705.x]
   Yassin A, 2007, ECOL ENTOMOL, V32, P698, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00911.x
   Yassin A, 2009, CR BIOL, V332, P898, DOI 10.1016/j.crvi.2009.06.003
NR 51
TC 1
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 21
PU SOC ENTOMOLOGIQUE FRANCE
PI PARIS
PA 45 RUE BUFFON, 75005 PARIS, FRANCE
SN 0037-9271
EI 2168-6351
J9 ANN SOC ENTOMOL FR
JI Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr.
PD JAN 2
PY 2019
VL 55
IS 1
BP 48
EP 60
DI 10.1080/00379271.2018.1540281
PG 13
WC Entomology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Entomology
GA HJ8TM
UT WOS:000457472900003
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Hoffmann, C
   Hanisch, M
   Heinsohn, JAB
   Dostal, V
   Jehn, M
   Liebers, U
   Pankow, W
   Donaldson, GC
   Witt, C
AF Hoffmann, Christina
   Hanisch, Marc
   Heinsohn, J. Ana B.
   Dostal, Vanessa
   Jehn, Melissa
   Liebers, Uta
   Pankow, Wulf
   Donaldson, Gavin C.
   Witt, Christian
TI Increased vulnerability of COPD patient groups to urban climate in view
   of global warming
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE
LA English
DT Article
DE COPD; acute exacerbation; seasonal phenotype; urban heat island; heat
   stress; climate change
ID DIURNAL TEMPERATURE-RANGE; EXACERBATION; HOSPITALIZATIONS; ADMISSIONS
AB Purpose: Patients with COPD show an increase in acute exacerbations (AECOPD) during the cold season as well as during heat waves in the summer months. Due to global climate changes, extreme weather conditions are likely to occur more frequently in the future. The goal of this study was to identify patient groups most at risk of exacerbations during the four seasons of the year and to determine at which temperature threshold the daily hospital admissions due to AECOPD increase during the summer.
   Patients and methods: We analyzed retrospective demographic and medical data of 990 patients, who were hospitalized for AECOPD in Berlin, Germany. The cases were grouped into the following cohorts: "spring" (admission between March and May), "summer" (June August), "autumn" (September - November), and "winter" (December - February). AECOPD hospital admissions from 2006 and 2010 were grouped into a "hot summer" cohort and cases from 2011 and 2012 into a "cold summer" data-set. Climate data were obtained from the German Meteorological Office.
   Results: Patients hospitalized for a COPD exacerbation during winter were significantly older than summertime patients (P=0.040) and also thinner than patients exacerbating in spring (P=0.042). COPD exacerbations during hot summer periods happened more often to patients with a history of myocardial infarction (P=0.014) or active smokers (P=0.011). An AECOPD during colder summers occurred in patients with a higher Charlson index, who suffered in increased numbers from peripheral vascular diseases (P=0.016) or tumors (P=0.004). Summertime hospital admissions increased above a daily minimum temperature of 18.3 degrees C (P=0.006).
   Conclusion: The identification of COPD patient groups most at risk for climate related exacerbations enables climate-adapted prevention through patient guidance and treatment. In view of global climate changes, discovering vulnerabilities and implementing adaptive measures will be of growing importance.
C1 [Hoffmann, Christina; Hanisch, Marc; Heinsohn, J. Ana B.; Dostal, Vanessa; Jehn, Melissa; Liebers, Uta; Witt, Christian] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Div Ambulatory Pneumol, CC12 Arbeitsbereich Ambulante Pneumol,Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany.
   [Pankow, Wulf] Vivantes Klinikum Neukolln, Thorac Ctr, Div Pneumol & Infectiol, Berlin, Germany.
   [Donaldson, Gavin C.] Imperial Coll London, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, Airways Dis Sect, London, England.
C3 Berlin Institute of Health; Free University of Berlin; Humboldt
   University of Berlin; Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin; VIivantes
   Klinikum Neukolln; Imperial College London
RP Hoffmann, C (corresponding author), Charite Univ Med Berlin, Div Ambulatory Pneumol, CC12 Arbeitsbereich Ambulante Pneumol,Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany.
EM christina.hoffmann2@charite.de
RI Donaldson, Gavin/M-7992-2017; Hoffmann, Christina/AAZ-3794-2021
OI Donaldson, Gavin/0000-0002-5538-4190; Liebers, Uta/0000-0003-0315-4534;
   Hoffmann, Christina/0000-0003-2079-9123
FU Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [FOR 1736, WI 1516/2-1]; DFG; Open
   Access Publication Fund of the Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin
FX The project was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) FOR
   1736 "Urban Climate and Heat Stress in mid-latitude Cities in View of
   Climate Change (UCaHS)", Project " Medical Vulnerability" WI 1516/2-1.
   The sponsor had no involvement at any stage, from study design to
   manuscript submission. We are thankful for the support from the DFG and
   the Open Access Publication Fund of the Charite - Universitatsmedizin
   Berlin for covering open access publication costs.
CR Almagro P, 2015, INT J CHRONIC OBSTR, V10, P899, DOI 10.2147/COPD.S75710
   Anderson GB, 2013, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V187, P1098, DOI 10.1164/rccm.201211-1969OC
   Beaudin AE, 2009, AM J PHYSIOL-REG I, V297, pR605, DOI 10.1152/ajpregu.90672.2008
   CHARLSON ME, 1987, J CHRON DIS, V40, P373, DOI 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
   Crandall CG, 2010, ACTA PHYSIOL, V199, P407, DOI 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02119.x
   Crooks CJ, 2015, BMJ OPEN, V5, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007974
   Donaldson GC, 2012, CHEST, V141, P94, DOI 10.1378/chest.11-0281
   Donaldson GC, 1999, EUR RESPIR J, V13, P844, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.13d25.x
   Gasparrini A, 2015, LANCET, V386, P369, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62114-0
   Holmer I, 2000, Int J Circumpolar Health, V59, P267
   Liang WM, 2009, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V53, P17, DOI 10.1007/s00484-008-0187-y
   Lim YH, 2012, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V417, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.12.048
   MANN M, 1993, CHEST, V103, P1369, DOI 10.1378/chest.103.5.1369
   Meehl GA, 2004, SCIENCE, V305, P994, DOI 10.1126/science.1098704
   MOLITERNO DJ, 1994, NEW ENGL J MED, V330, P454, DOI 10.1056/NEJM199402173300702
   Montserrat-Capdevila J, 2016, INT J TUBERC LUNG D, V20, P389, DOI 10.5588/ijtld.15.0441
   Périard JD, 2015, SCAND J MED SCI SPOR, V25, P20, DOI 10.1111/sms.12408
   Petkova EP, 2017, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V125, P47, DOI 10.1289/EHP166
   Scherer D, 2013, ERDE, V144, P238
   Stojic SS, 2016, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12940-016-0164-6
   Tseng CM, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0057066
   Westerik JAM, 2017, RESP RES, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12931-017-0512-2
   Witt C, 2015, DTSCH ARZTEBL INT, V112, P878, DOI 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0878
   Zanobetti A, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P6608, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1113070109
NR 24
TC 14
Z9 14
U1 0
U2 8
PU DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
PI ALBANY
PA PO BOX 300-008, ALBANY, AUCKLAND 0752, NEW ZEALAND
SN 1178-2005
J9 INT J CHRONIC OBSTR
JI Int. J. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis.
PY 2018
VL 13
BP 3493
EP 3501
DI 10.2147/COPD.S174148
PG 9
WC Respiratory System
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Respiratory System
GA GX8ZI
UT WOS:000448084800003
PM 30498339
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Kou, XJ
   Li, Q
   Beierkuhnlein, C
   Zhao, YH
   Liu, SR
AF Kou, Xiaojun
   Li, Qin
   Beierkuhnlein, Carl
   Zhao, Yiheng
   Liu, Shirong
TI A New Tool for Exploring Climate Change Induced Range Shifts of Conifer
   Species in China
SO PLOS ONE
LA English
DT Article
ID DISTRIBUTION MODELS; ASSISTED COLONIZATION; SELECTING THRESHOLDS; CHANGE
   IMPACTS; PLANT; DISTRIBUTIONS; PREDICTION; LANDSCAPE; HABITAT; METRICS
AB It is inevitable that tree species will undergo considerable range shifts in response to anthropogenic induced climate change, even in the near future. Species Distribution Models (SDMs) are valuable tools in exploring general temporal trends and spatial patterns of potential range shifts. Understanding projections to future climate for tree species will facilitate policy making in forestry. Comparative studies for a large number of tree species require the availability of suitable and standardized indices. A crucial limitation when deriving such indices is the threshold problem in defining ranges, which has made interspecies comparison problematic until now. Here we propose a set of threshold-free indices, which measure range explosion (I), overlapping (O), and range center movement in three dimensions (Dx, Dy, Dz), based on fuzzy set theory (Fuzzy Set based Potential Range Shift Index, F-PRS Index). A graphical tool (PRS_Chart) was developed to visualize these indices. This technique was then applied to 46 Pinaceae species that are widely distributed and partly common in China. The spatial patterns of the modeling results were then statistically tested for significance. Results showed that range overlap was generally low; no trends in range size changes and longitudinal movements could be found, but northward and poleward movement trends were highly significant. Although range shifts seemed to exhibit huge interspecies variation, they were very consistent for certain climate change scenarios. Comparing the IPCC scenarios, we found that scenario A1B would lead to a larger extent of range shifts (less overlapping and more latitudinal movement) than the A2 and the B1 scenarios. It is expected that the newly developed standardized indices and the respective graphical tool will facilitate studies on PRS's for other tree species groups that are important in forestry as well, and thus support climate adaptive forest management.
C1 [Kou, Xiaojun] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China.
   [Kou, Xiaojun; Zhao, Yiheng] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Qin] Univ British Columbia, Dept Bot, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   [Beierkuhnlein, Carl] Univ Bayreuth, Dept Biogeog, Bayreuth, Germany.
   [Liu, Shirong] Chinese Acad Forestry, Inst Forest Environm & Ecol, Beijing, Peoples R China.
C3 Beijing Normal University; Beijing Normal University; University of
   British Columbia; University of Bayreuth; Chinese Academy of Forestry
RP Liu, SR (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Forestry, Inst Forest Environm & Ecol, Beijing, Peoples R China.
EM Liusr@caf.ac.cn
RI Beierkuhnlein, Carl/ABF-9693-2021; Beierkuhnlein, Carl/ABF-8797-2021
OI Beierkuhnlein, Carl/0000-0002-6456-4628
FU Special Research Program for Public-Welfare Forestry [201404201]; NSFC's
   Project [31370486]
FX This research was carried out with the support of the Special Research
   Program for Public-Welfare Forestry (Grant No. 201404201) and NSFC's
   Project (Grant No. 31370486). The funders had no role in study design,
   data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the
   manuscript.
CR Allouche O, 2006, J APPL ECOL, V43, P1223, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x
   [Anonymous], 1987, Climate and plant distributionM
   [Anonymous], 1995, Ecophysiology of coniferous forests
   Araújo MB, 2004, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V10, P1618, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00828.x
   Araújo MB, 2002, CONSERV BIOL, V16, P1662, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.02068.x
   Araújo MB, 2007, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V22, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010
   Araújo MB, 2006, J BIOGEOGR, V33, P1677, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01584.x
   Austin MP, 2011, J BIOGEOGR, V38, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02416.x
   Bellard C, 2012, ECOL LETT, V15, P365, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x
   Bittner T, 2011, J VEG SCI, V22, P699, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01266.x
   Botkin DB, 2007, BIOSCIENCE, V57, P227, DOI 10.1641/B570306
   Bradley BA, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P1511, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01824.x
   Carrete M, 2012, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V10, P12, DOI 10.1890/12.WB.004
   Chambers D, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V291, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.046
   Chiarucci A, 2010, J VEG SCI, V21, P1172, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01218.x
   Colwell RK, 2008, SCIENCE, V322, P258, DOI 10.1126/science.1162547
   Corlett RT, 2012, BIOL CONSERV, V151, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.027
   Crimmins SM, 2011, SCIENCE, V331, P324, DOI 10.1126/science.1199040
   Curtis JMR, 2008, CONSERV BIOL, V22, P1225, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00994.x
   Dobrowski SZ, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P241, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12026
   Dobrowski SZ, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, DOI 10.1126/science.1205029
   Eckenwalder J.E., 2009, Conifers of the World
   Elith J, 2006, ECOGRAPHY, V29, P129, DOI 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
   Elith J, 2011, DIVERS DISTRIB, V17, P43, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
   Elith J, 2009, ECOGRAPHY, V32, P66, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05505.x
   Engler R, 2004, J APPL ECOL, V41, P263, DOI 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00881.x
   Engler R, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2330, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02393.x
   Etterson JR, 2001, SCIENCE, V294, P151, DOI 10.1126/science.1063656
   Fang J., 2009, ATLAS WOODY PLANTS C
   Farjon A, 2010, HANDBOOK OF THE WORLD'S CONIFERS, VOL 1, P1, DOI 10.1163/9789047430629
   Farjon A, 2008, NATURAL HIST CONIFER
   Feeley KJ, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P3606, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12012
   Feeley KJ, 2011, J BIOGEOGR, V38, P783, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02444.x
   Ficarra FVC, 2011, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6616, P44, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-20810-2_6
   Frei E, 2010, BOT HELV, V120, P117, DOI 10.1007/s00035-010-0076-y
   Guisan A, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P993, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x
   Hampe A, 2004, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V13, P469, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2004.00090.x
   Harrison SP, 2010, J VEG SCI, V21, P300, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01144.x
   Hickling R, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P450, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01116.x
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   Ibáñez I, 2006, ECOLOGY, V87, P1896, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1896:PBCOTC]2.0.CO;2
   Iverson LR, 2008, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V254, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.023
   Ives AR, 2010, AM NAT, V176, pE128, DOI 10.1086/656486
   Jablonski D, 2008, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V39, P501, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173510
   Jaeschke A, 2013, INSECT CONSERV DIVER, V6, P93, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00194.x
   Jentsch A, 2008, CR GEOSCI, V340, P621, DOI 10.1016/j.crte.2008.07.002
   Jiménez-Valverde A, 2007, ACTA OECOL, V31, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.actao.2007.02.001
   Jump AS, 2009, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V24, P694, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.007
   Kattge J, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2905, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x
   Kéry M, 2010, CONSERV BIOL, V24, P1388, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01479.x
   Kou XJ, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0023115
   Kou XJ, 2011, ECOL INFORM, V6, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2011.01.004
   Kreyling J, 2011, RESTOR ECOL, V19, P433, DOI 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00777.x
   Kupfer JA, 2012, PROG PHYS GEOG, V36, P400, DOI 10.1177/0309133312439594
   Lenoir J, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P1768, DOI 10.1126/science.1156831
   LePage BA, 2003, ACTA HORTIC, P29, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.615.1
   Liu CR, 2013, J BIOGEOGR, V40, P778, DOI 10.1111/jbi.12058
   Liu CR, 2005, ECOGRAPHY, V28, P385, DOI 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03957.x
   McKenney DW, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2720, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02413.x
   Millar CI, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P2145, DOI 10.1890/06-1715.1
   Mouillot D, 2009, ECOGRAPHY, V32, P671, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05679.x
   Münkemüller T, 2012, ECOGRAPHY, V35, P468, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07259.x
   Oney B, 2013, ECOL EVOL, V3, P437, DOI 10.1002/ece3.426
   Pearson RG, 2005, BIOL CONSERV, V123, P389, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.12.006
   Peterson A.T., 2011, Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions (MPB- 49), V56
   Phillips SJ, 2008, ECOGRAPHY, V31, P161, DOI 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x
   PRENTICE IC, 1992, J BIOGEOGR, V19, P117, DOI 10.2307/2845499
   Real R, 2010, ECOGRAPHY, V33, P304, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06251.x
   Reyer CPO, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P75, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12023
   Schwartz MW, 2012, BIOSCIENCE, V62, P732, DOI 10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.6
   Summers DM, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P3268, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02771.x
   Swenson NG, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0021264
   Tabor K, 2010, ECOL APPL, V20, P554, DOI 10.1890/09-0173.1
   Thomas CD, 2004, NATURE, V427, P145, DOI 10.1038/nature02121
   Thomas CD, 2006, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V21, P415, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.012
   Thomas CD, 2011, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V26, P497, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.006
   Thomas CD, 2011, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V26, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.02.006
   Thuiller W, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P8245, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0409902102
   Thuiller W, 2004, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V10, P2020, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00859.x
   Thuiller W, 2011, NATURE, V470, P531, DOI 10.1038/nature09705
   Thuiller W, 2009, ECOGRAPHY, V32, P369, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05742.x
   Tuomisto H, 2010, ECOGRAPHY, V33, P2, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05880.x
   Uuemaa E, 2013, ECOL INDIC, V28, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.018
   Vilà M, 2011, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V26, P496, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.010
   Webb TJ, 2003, AM NAT, V161, P553, DOI 10.1086/368296
   Webber BL, 2011, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V26, P495, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.007
   Wilson CD, 2011, DIVERS DISTRIB, V17, P182, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00723.x
   Wu Z.Y., 1980, VEGETATION CHINA
   ZADEH LA, 1965, INFORM CONTROL, V8, P338, DOI 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
NR 89
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 1
U2 48
PU PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
PI SAN FRANCISCO
PA 1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA
SN 1932-6203
J9 PLOS ONE
JI PLoS One
PD SEP 30
PY 2014
VL 9
IS 9
AR e98643
DI 10.1371/journal.pone.0098643
PG 16
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA AR6CW
UT WOS:000343671700002
PM 25268604
OA gold, Green Published, Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Campoy, JA
   Ruiz, D
   Allderman, L
   Cook, N
   Egea, J
AF Campoy, Jose Antonio
   Ruiz, David
   Allderman, Laura
   Cook, Nigel
   Egea, Jose
TI The fulfilment of chilling requirements and the adaptation of apricot
   (<i>Prunus armeniaca</i> L.) in warm winter climates: An approach in
   Murcia (Spain) and the Western Cape (South Africa)
SO EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY
LA English
DT Article
DE Chilling requirement; Climatic change; Dormancy; Heat requirement;
   Model; Prunus armeniaca L
ID HEAT REQUIREMENT; DORMANCY BREAKING; BUD DORMANCY; FRUIT-TREES;
   TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENCE; PREDICTION MODEL; VEGETATIVE BUDS;
   DYNAMIC-MODEL; PEACH-TREES; FLOWER BUDS
AB Different chilling requirements (CRs) are required for apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars to overcome dormancy. In a global climate change context, knowledge of these requirements is critical; producers must select the appropriate cultivars to avoid losses caused by an inadequate cultivar adaptation in a particular area. Important differences have been reported in the CRs of cultivars of temperate fruit crops that are cultivated in different climatic conditions. However, the lack of standardisation of protocols to calculate CRs hinders the comparison of the results obtained using different methodologies. This study was aimed at analysing adaptation in terms of the CR fulfilment of commercial apricot cultivars grown successfully in different climatic conditions. Apricot-growing locations with different latitudes and altitudes and cultivars with varying CRs were chosen. The plant material spanned the CR range for this species in South Africa and Spain. Three of the examined cultivars were tested simultaneously in both countries. The Utah, Dynamic and hours below 7 degrees C models for estimating CR were evaluated and compared. The cultivars examined displayed different CR ranges in Spain and South Africa. We concluded that CR differences higher than 50% can be found for clonal plant material grown successfully in different climatic conditions. This variation might be associated both with different temperatures and other factors such as latitude. No significant differences in heat requirements were found among cultivars in Spain, suggesting that this variable might not be cultivar-specific. Finally, the distribution of clonal plant material provides an excellent framework for studying the climatic adaptation of crops. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Campoy, Jose Antonio; Ruiz, David; Egea, Jose] CEBAS CSIC, Dept Plant Breeding, E-30100 Murcia, Espinardo, Spain.
   [Allderman, Laura] Agr Res Council, Fruit Wine & Vine Res Inst, ARC Infruitec Nietvoorbij, ZA-7599 Stellenbosch, South Africa.
   [Cook, Nigel] Deciduous Fruit Producers Trust Res, ZA-7613 Stellenbosch, South Africa.
C3 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC); CSIC - Centro de
   Edafologia y Biologia Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS); Agricultural Research
   Council of South Africa; Institute for Deciduous Fruit, Vines & Wine,
   Agricultural Research Council
RP Campoy, JA (corresponding author), INRA Bordeaux, Unite Rech Especes Fruitieres UREF, 70 Av E Bourlaux, F-33140 Villenave Dornon, France.
EM jacampoy@bordeaux.inra.fr
RI Ruiz, David/L-1834-2017; Campoy, José/L-2699-2015
OI CAMPOY, Jose Antonio/0000-0002-6018-5698; Ruiz,
   David/0000-0002-2659-8210; EGEA, JOSE/0000-0003-1438-0561
FU Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [AGL2004-04126-C01-01,
   BES-2005-7052]; Fundacion Seneca-Agencia de Ciencia y Tecnologia de la
   Region de Murcia
FX The authors are grateful to the Spanish Ministry of Science and
   Innovation, for financing the Project AGL2004-04126-C01-01 and for
   financially assisting J.A.C. (BES-2005-7052 to J.A.C.). J.A. Campoy is
   holder of a grant from the 'Programa de Formacion Posdoctoral de
   Personal Investigador (Fundacion Seneca-Agencia de Ciencia y Tecnologia
   de la Region de Murcia)'. The authors are very grateful to M.D. Nortes,
   A. Molina, the Department of Horticultural Science, University of
   Stellenbosch and the South African growers for technical assistance; and
   the anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments.
CR Alburquerque N, 2008, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V64, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.01.003
   Anderson J. L., 1986, Acta Horticulturae, P71
   Andrés MV, 1999, J HORTIC SCI BIOTECH, V74, P757, DOI 10.1080/14620316.1999.11511184
   [Anonymous], 1981, ACTA HORTIC, DOI DOI 10.17660/ACTAHORTIC.1981.120.23
   [Anonymous], ACTA HORTICULTURAE
   Baggiolini M., 1952, REV ROM DAGRICULTURE, V8, P29
   Bailey C.H., 1977, ACTA HORTIC, V85, P184
   BALANDIER P, 1993, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V55, P249, DOI 10.1016/0304-4238(93)90036-P
   BALANDIER P, 1993, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V67, P95, DOI 10.1016/0168-1923(93)90052-J
   Baldocchi D, 2008, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V87, pS153, DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9367-8
   BROWN DS, 1957, PLANT PHYSIOL, V32, P75, DOI 10.1104/pp.32.2.75
   Campoy JA, 2011, PLANT BIOSYST, V145, P596, DOI 10.1080/11263504.2011.559361
   Campoy JA, 2011, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V130, P357, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.07.011
   Campoy JA, 2011, EUR J HORTIC SCI, V76, P51
   Campoy JA, 2011, S AFR J BOT, V77, P618, DOI 10.1016/j.sajb.2010.12.006
   Campoy JA, 2010, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V125, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.03.029
   Campoy JA, 2011, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V129, P649, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.05.008
   Citadin I, 2001, HORTSCIENCE, V36, P305, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.36.2.305
   COUVILLON GA, 1974, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V99, P23
   COUVILLON GA, 1985, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V110, P47
   Darbyshire R, 2011, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V151, P1074, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.03.010
   Dennis FG, 2003, HORTSCIENCE, V38, P347, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.38.3.347
   Egea J, 2003, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V50, P79, DOI 10.1016/S0098-8472(03)00002-9
   Egea J., 2004, FRUITS, V59, P1
   Erez A, 1998, ACTA HORTIC, P507, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.465.63
   Erez A, 1995, ACTA HORTIC, P81, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.1995.395.7
   Erez A, 2000, TEMPERATE FRUIT CROPS IN WARM CLIMATES, P17
   EREZ A, 1979, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V104, P573
   Faust M, 1997, HORTSCIENCE, V32, P623, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.32.4.623
   FISHMAN S, 1987, J THEOR BIOL, V126, P309, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5193(87)80237-0
   FISHMAN S, 1987, J THEOR BIOL, V124, P473, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5193(87)80221-7
   Garcia EG, 1999, ACTA HORTIC, P289, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.1999.488.45
   GIANFAGNA TJ, 1985, HORTSCIENCE, V20, P909
   GILREATH PR, 1981, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V106, P426
   Guerriero R., 1988, Acta Horticulturae, P39
   Guerriero R., 2002, FRUTTICOLTURA, V3, P73
   Harrington CA, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P798, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.018
   Heide OM, 2008, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V115, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2007.10.005
   LINSLEYNOAKES GC, 1994, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V59, P107, DOI 10.1016/0304-4238(94)90077-9
   Luedeling E, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0020155
   Luedeling E, 2011, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V55, P411, DOI 10.1007/s00484-010-0352-y
   Luedeling E, 2009, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V149, P1854, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.06.013
   Luedeling E, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006166
   Luedeling E, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V96, P219, DOI 10.1007/s10584-009-9581-7
   Luedeling E, 2009, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V133, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.016
   MAUGET JC, 1977, CR ACAD SCI D NAT, V284, P2351
   Olsen JE, 2010, PLANT MOL BIOL, V73, P37, DOI 10.1007/s11103-010-9620-9
   Overcash J.P, 1965, HEAT REQUIRED PEAR V
   Pawasut A, 2004, J JPN SOC HORTIC SCI, V73, P519, DOI 10.2503/jjshs.73.519
   Pérez FJ, 2008, CHIL J AGR RES, V68, P198
   RICHARDSON E A, 1974, Hortscience, V9, P331
   ROM RC, 1966, P AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V88, P239
   Roos P. B., 2015, International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses, V7, P13
   Ruiz D, 2007, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V61, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.06.008
   Saure M. C., 1985, Horticultural Reviews, V7, P239, DOI 10.1002/9781118060735.ch6
   SHALTOUT AD, 1983, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V108, P957
   SPIEGELROY P, 1979, J HORTIC SCI BIOTECH, V54, P115, DOI 10.1080/00221589.1979.11514858
   Tabuenca MC., 1964, ANN AULA, V7, P113
   Tanino KK, 2010, PLANT MOL BIOL, V73, P49, DOI 10.1007/s11103-010-9610-y
   THOMPSON WK, 1975, AUST J AGR RES, V26, P989, DOI 10.1071/AR9750989
   Valentini N, 2004, ACTA HORTIC, P199, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.636.24
   Viti R, 2010, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V124, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.01.001
   Weinberger J. H., 1944, PROC AMER SOC HORT SCI, V45, P233
   WEINBERGER JH, 1950, P AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V56, P122
   YOUNG E, 1992, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V117, P271, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.117.2.271
   Zhang JL, 2011, HORTSCIENCE, V46, P420, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.46.3.420
NR 66
TC 118
Z9 123
U1 0
U2 91
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1161-0301
EI 1873-7331
J9 EUR J AGRON
JI Eur. J. Agron.
PD FEB
PY 2012
VL 37
IS 1
BP 43
EP 55
DI 10.1016/j.eja.2011.10.004
PG 13
WC Agronomy
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA 896BF
UT WOS:000300539700005
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Ambs, D
   Schmied, G
   Zlatanov, T
   Kienlein, S
   Pretzsch, H
   Nikolova, PS
AF Ambs, Dominik
   Schmied, Gerhard
   Zlatanov, Tzvetan
   Kienlein, Sebastian
   Pretzsch, Hans
   Nikolova, Petia Simeonova
TI Regeneration dynamics in mixed mountain forests at their natural
   geographical distribution range in the Western Rhodopes
SO FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Natural regeneration; Mixed mountain forests; Conversion of spruce
   -dominated stands; Microsite differences; Ungulate browsing
ID TO-NATURE SILVICULTURE; NORWAY SPRUCE FORESTS; CLIMATE-CHANGE;
   PICEA-ABIES; SHADE-TOLERANT; SILVER FIR; SEEDLING ESTABLISHMENT; GROWTH
   DYNAMICS; BEECH FOREST; MANAGEMENT
AB Mixed mountain forests consisting of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.), European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), and silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) are among the most productive and stable forest ecosystems in Europe. Their southeasternmost geographical distribution range is located in the Western Rhodopes, where they have high economic, recreational, and ecological value. In the past, shelterwood cuttings dominated forest management practices in these forests and were mainly aimed at maintaining and reproducing conifers. During the past two decades, single-tree and group-tree selection systems have been promoted as alternative management approaches to support the conversion of spruce-dominated stands to close-to-nature mixed forests of fir, beech, and spruce. However, the natural regeneration dynamics in these stands are barely known, and their dependence on microsite and management effects needs to be better understood. The objective of this study was to investigate ecological factors under management regimes of different intensity ("single-tree"-selection and "group-tree"-selection) that influence the regeneration processes in mixed mountain forests in the Bulgarian Rhodopes. Data on regeneration and microsite conditions were collected on 105 systematically distributed plots (25 m(2)/100 m(2)) in four 100-120 years old stands located in the regional forest district of Smoljan, Bulgaria (1580-1650 m a.s.l.). We relied on generalizeds linear mixed models to analyse for each species the (1) size-dependent regeneration density and (2) height increment in dependence on management practices, competing vegetation, as well as soil and light conditions. Our study revealed an overall high potential for recruitment in the Western Rhodopes. Regeneration density was highest in fir (median 12800 N ha-1), followed by spruce (median 1600 N ha-1) and beech (median 1200 N ha-1). Fir benefited most from "single-tree" selection cuttings, while "group-tree" selection cutting tended to promote beech and fir but also spruce. Competing ground vegetation was detrimental for seedling density of all species. Annual height increment increased with plant size, was lowest in spruce, and similar in fir and beech. Sapling increment was driven by light, whereas seedlings did not react to increased radiation. Browsing was species-specific and was highest in beech (15-30 %), followed by fir (5-10 %) and spruce (<1 %). It was not a crucial factor in impeding tree recruitment. We conclude that frequent harvest activities of low intensity which consider advanced regeneration are a promising approach to successfully convert the formerly spruce-firdominated forests to climate-adapted fir-beech-(spruce)-mixed stands.
C1 [Ambs, Dominik; Schmied, Gerhard; Pretzsch, Hans] Tech Univ Munich, Chair Forest Growth & Yield Sci, TUM Sch Life Sci, Hans Carl von Carlowitz Pl 2, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany.
   [Zlatanov, Tzvetan] Bulgarian Acad Sci, Inst Biodivers & Ecosyst Res, Gagarin St 2, Sofia 1113, Bulgaria.
   [Kienlein, Sebastian] Bavarian State Minist Food Agr & Forestry StMELF, Bavarian Off Forest Genet, Forstamtspl 1, D-83317 Teisendorf, Germany.
   [Nikolova, Petia Simeonova] Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, Forest Resources & Management, Zurcherstr 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
C3 Technical University of Munich; Bulgarian Academy of Sciences; Swiss
   Federal Institutes of Technology Domain; Swiss Federal Institute for
   Forest, Snow & Landscape Research
RP Ambs, D (corresponding author), Tech Univ Munich, Chair Forest Growth & Yield Sci, TUM Sch Life Sci, Hans Carl von Carlowitz Pl 2, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany.
EM dominik.ambs@tum.de
RI Schmied, Gerhard/HPD-9129-2023; Zlatanov, Tzvetan/D-3707-2014; Pretzsch,
   Hans/AAC-5565-2019; Pretzsch, Hans/K-3716-2014
OI Ambs, Dominik/0000-0003-4475-7251; Schmied, Gerhard/0000-0003-2424-7705;
   Zlatanov, Tzvetan/0000-0003-4205-3429; Pretzsch,
   Hans/0000-0002-4958-1868
CR AKAIKE H, 1974, IEEE T AUTOMAT CONTR, VAC19, P716, DOI 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   Albrich K, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P4013, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15118
   Aleksandrov A., 2009, Country Report
   Ammer C., 1999, Impact of silvicultural treatments on natural regeneration of a mixed mountain forest in the Bavarian Alps
   Annighöfer P, 2019, FRONT PLANT SCI, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2019.00690
   Annighöfer P, 2018, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V415, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.02.027
   Annighöfer P, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V391, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.01.010
   [Anonymous], 2015, World Soil Resources Reports No. 106
   [Anonymous], 2008, Ecological Models and Data in R
   Aquilué N, 2021, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V481, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118692
   Axer M, 2022, FRONT FOR GLOB CHANG, V5, DOI 10.3389/ffgc.2022.826186
   Balandier P, 2006, FORESTRY, V79, P3, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpi056
   Bauhus J., 2017, MIXED SPECIES FOREST, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-54553-9_1
   Bebre L, 2020, IFOREST, V13, P261, DOI 10.3832/ifor3370-013
   Bednar P, 2022, FORESTS, V13, DOI 10.3390/f13111804
   Behling H, 2015, Solariscope SOL 300: Bedienungsanleitung
   Bigler C, 2006, ECOSYSTEMS, V9, P330, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0126-2
   Bílek L, 2014, DENDROBIOLOGY, V71, P59, DOI 10.12657/denbio.071.006
   BMEL, 2020, Massive Schaden - Einsatz fur die Walder.
   Bocheva L, 2009, ATMOS RES, V93, P490, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.10.025
   Bolker B., 2020, bbmle: Tools for General Maximum Likelihood Estimation
   Bottero A, 2011, SILVA FENN, V45, P875, DOI 10.14214/sf.76
   Bowditch E, 2020, ECOSYST SERV, V43, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101113
   Brang P, 1998, CAN J FOREST RES, V28, P626, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-28-4-626
   Brang P, 2014, FORESTRY, V87, P492, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpu018
   Cater M, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V399, P206, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.05.042
   Caudullo G, 2017, DATA BRIEF, V12, P662, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2017.05.007
   Conedera M, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V388, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.10.027
   Crawley M. J., 2013, The R Book, V2nd
   Cribari-Neto F, 2010, J STAT SOFTW, V34, P1
   Danescu A, 2018, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V430, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.07.055
   De Frenne P, 2021, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V27, P2279, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15569
   Delignette-Muller ML, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V64, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v064.i04
   Diaci J, 2020, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V455, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117688
   Diaci J, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V285, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.08.010
   Dimitrov D., 1976, Climatology of Bulgaria
   Dountchev A., 2015, Forestry Ideas, V21, P293
   Dountchev A., 2016, Forestry Ideas, V21, P293
   Duveneck MJ, 2015, ECOL APPL, V25, P1653, DOI 10.1890/14-0738.1
   Dyderski MK, 2018, ANN FOREST SCI, V75, DOI 10.1007/s13595-018-0775-x
   Feldmann E, 2018, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V415, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.02.022
   Fox J., 2019, An R Companion to Applied Regression, V3rd ed
   Fox J, 2018, J STAT SOFTW, V87, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v087.i09
   Gamfeldt L, 2013, NAT COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1038/ncomms2328
   Gelman A., 2021, REGRESSION OTHER STO
   GENOV PW, 1993, Z JAGDWISS, V39, P217, DOI 10.1007/BF02241396
   Gillerot L, 2021, ECOSYSTEMS, V24, P20, DOI 10.1007/s10021-020-00501-y
   Gimmi U, 2010, ANN FOREST SCI, V67, DOI 10.1051/forest/2010026
   Grasovsky A, 1929, Yale School of Forestry Bulletin, V23, P7
   Grassi G, 2001, TREE PHYSIOL, V21, P959, DOI 10.1093/treephys/21.12-13.959
   Gratzer G, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9050230
   Grün B, 2012, J STAT SOFTW, V48, P1
   Grunewald K, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V95, P535, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9508-8
   Hartig F., 2022, R package
   HEISS E, 1990, Berichte des Naturwissenschaftlich-Medizinischen Vereins in Innsbruck, V77, P123
   Hilmers T, 2020, EUR J FOREST RES, V139, P567, DOI 10.1007/s10342-020-01270-y
   Hilmers T, 2019, FORESTRY, V92, P512, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpz035
   Hlásny T, 2017, EUR J FOREST RES, V136, P1013, DOI 10.1007/s10342-017-1028-5
   Hobi ML, 2015, ECOSPHERE, V6, DOI 10.1890/ES14-00390.1
   Horvat I., 1974, Fischer (geobotanica Selecta, V4
   Hunziker U, 2005, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V210, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.019
   Imbeck H., 1987, Verjungungsokologische Untersuchungen in einem hochstaudenreichen subalpinen Fichtenwald. mit spezieller Berucksichtigung der Schneeablagerung und der Lawinenbildung
   Käber Y, 2021, ECOL EVOL, V11, P12182, DOI 10.1002/ece3.7984
   Kalt T., 2021, Schweizerische Zeitschrift Fur Forstwesen, V172, P156, DOI [10.3188/szf.2021.0156, DOI 10.3188/SZF.2021.0156]
   Kaplan JO, 2009, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V28, P3016, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.09.028
   Kelemen K, 2012, SILVA FENN, V46, P53, DOI 10.14214/sf.65
   Klopcic M, 2015, FORESTRY, V88, P552, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpv021
   Kneeshaw DD, 2006, J ECOL, V94, P471, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01070.x
   Knoke T, 2021, ECOL ECON, V185, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107046
   KOBE RK, 1995, ECOL APPL, V5, P517, DOI 10.2307/1942040
   Kohnle U., 2011, LWF Wissen, P41
   Kolling C., 2007, Klimahullen fur 27 Waldbaumarten, P1242
   Kupferschmid A. D., 2019, Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen, V170, P125, DOI 10.3188/szf.2019.0125
   Kupferschmid AD, 2018, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V429, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.06.046
   Lafond V, 2017, EUR J FOREST RES, V136, P997, DOI 10.1007/s10342-016-1022-3
   Laiho Olavi, 2014, Forest Ecosystems, V1, P4, DOI 10.1186/2197-5620-1-4
   Ldecke D., 2018, J Open Source Softw, V3, P772, DOI [DOI 10.21105/JOSS.00772, 10.21105/joss.00772]
   Ldecke D., 2021, J OPEN SOURCE SOFTW, V6, DOI [10.21105/joss.03139, DOI 10.21105/JOSS.03139]
   LERTZMAN KP, 1992, ECOLOGY, V73, P657, DOI 10.2307/1940772
   Leuschner C., 2017, Ecology of central European forests
   LISS BM, 1988, FORSTWISS CENTRALBL, V107, P14, DOI 10.1007/BF02742169
   Lof M., 2018, Dynamics, Silviculture and Management of Mixed Forests, P103
   Löf M, 2007, FORESTRY, V80, P371, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpm022
   Löf M, 2023, EUR J FOREST RES, V142, P763, DOI 10.1007/s10342-023-01554-z
   Lundqvist L, 1996, SCAND J FOREST RES, V11, P364, DOI 10.1080/02827589609382948
   Masson-Delmotte V, 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE 2021, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009157896
   McCarthy John, 2001, Environmental Reviews, V9, P1, DOI 10.1139/a00-012
   MOSANDL R, 1988, FORSTWISS CENTRALBL, V107, P2, DOI 10.1007/BF02742168
   Muraoka H, 2001, FUNCT ECOL, V15, P798, DOI 10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00581.x
   Niinemets Ü, 2006, J ECOL, V94, P464, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01093.x
   Nikolov BP, 2022, AVIAN RES, V13, DOI 10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100020
   Nikolova PS, 2020, FRONT PLANT SCI, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2020.01211
   Nikolova PS, 2011, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V25, P859, DOI 10.1007/s00468-011-0561-y
   Nopp-Mayr U, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-76843-3
   Orman O, 2021, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V482, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118866
   Paluch J, 2019, EUR J FOREST RES, V138, P889, DOI 10.1007/s10342-019-01209-y
   Panagos P, 2011, INT J DIGIT EARTH, V4, P434, DOI 10.1080/17538947.2011.596580
   PANAYOTOV M., 2016, Mountain coniferous forests in Bulgaria - structure and natural dynamics.
   Panayotov M, 2019, ADV GLOB CHANGE RES, V65, P429, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-95267-3_35
   Patzner K.M, 2004, Die Transpiration von Waldbaumen als Grundlage der Validierung und Modellierung der Bestandestranspiration in einem Wassereinzugsgebiet des Flusses 'Ammer'
   Petrovska R, 2023, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V537, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120939
   Petrovska R, 2022, EUR J FOREST RES, V141, P43, DOI 10.1007/s10342-021-01427-3
   Pluess A. R., 2016, WALD KLIMAWANDEL GRU
   Pretzsch H., 2017, Mixed-Species Forests, Mixed-Species Forests, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-54553-94, 10.1007/978-3-662-54553-9]
   Pretzsch H, 2021, EUR J FOREST RES, V140, P1267, DOI 10.1007/s10342-021-01388-7
   Pretzsch H, 2020, CAN J FOREST RES, V50, P689, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2019-0368
   Pretzsch H, 2017, FOR ECOSYST, V4, DOI 10.1186/s40663-017-0105-z
   Pretzsch H, 2015, FORESTRY, V88, P407, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpv013
   PREUHSLER T, 1981, FORSTWISS CENTRALBL, V100, P313, DOI 10.1007/BF02640650
   Prietzel VJ, 2008, ALLG FORST JAGDZTG, V179, P104
   R Core Team, 2020, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
   Reventlow DOJ, 2021, EUR J FOREST RES, V140, P1005, DOI 10.1007/s10342-021-01381-0
   Rigling A., 2008, Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen, V159, P316, DOI 10.3188/szf.2008.0316
   Schmid U, 2021, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V490, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119076
   Schmied G, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V868, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161601
   Schütz JP, 1999, FORESTRY, V72, P359, DOI 10.1093/forestry/72.4.359
   Seidl R, 2011, CAN J FOREST RES, V41, P694, DOI [10.1139/X10-235, 10.1139/x10-235]
   Senf C, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-19924-1
   Shishkov T, 2014, WOR SOIL BOOK SER, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7784-2
   Simon A, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V453, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117589
   Stancioiu PT, 2006, EUR J FOREST RES, V125, P151, DOI 10.1007/s10342-005-0069-3
   Stanturf JA, 2020, BURL DODDS AGR SCI, V71, P355, DOI 10.19103/AS.2019.0057.14
   Thom D, 2023, EUR J FOREST RES, V142, P259, DOI 10.1007/s10342-022-01520-1
   Thrippleton T, 2016, ECOSYSTEMS, V19, P1240, DOI 10.1007/s10021-016-9999-5
   Tsvetanov N, 2018, IFOREST, V11, P675, DOI 10.3832/ifor2754-011
   Unkule M, 2022, ANN FOREST SCI, V79, DOI 10.1186/s13595-022-01126-y
   van Huis John, 2013, Phytologia Balcanica, V19, P169
   Vencurik J, 2020, IFOREST, V13, P56, DOI 10.3832/ifor3183-012
   von Lüpke B, 2004, EUR FOR INST RES REP, V18, P121
   Walter H., 1960, Klimadiagramm Weltatlas
   Zielonka T, 2006, J VEG SCI, V17, P739, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02497.x
   Zirlewagen D, 2001, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V143, P27, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00522-3
   Zlatanov T, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P79, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0869-z
   Zuur AF, 2010, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V1, P3, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00001.x
   Zuur Alain F., 2009, P1
NR 135
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 3
U2 12
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0378-1127
EI 1872-7042
J9 FOREST ECOL MANAG
JI For. Ecol. Manage.
PD JAN 15
PY 2024
VL 552
AR 121550
DI 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121550
EA NOV 2023
PG 14
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA Z6DS3
UT WOS:001112964000001
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Chauhan, PR
AF Chauhan, Parth R.
BE Hovers, E
   Braun, DR
TI Early <i>Homo</i> Occupation Near the <i>Gate of Tears</i>: Examining
   the Paleoanthropological Records of Djibouti and Yemen
SO INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACHES TO THE OLDOWAN
SE Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT Symposium on Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Oldowan held at the
   Annual Meeting of the Society-of American-Archaeology
CY MAR, 2006
CL San Juan, PR
SP Soc Amer Archaeol
DE Early Homo; Dispersal routes; Plio-Pleistocene; Bab al-Mandab; Yemen;
   Djibouti
ID LATE PLIOCENE; ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES; PLEISTOCENE RECORD; HOMINID
   DISPERSAL; ARABIAN PENINSULA; ELEPHAS-RECKI; MIDDLE-AWASH; STONE TOOLS;
   AFRICA; AFAR
AB The Bab al-Mandab region has often been considered a primary crossing point for early hominins following a southern coastal route from East Africa to South and Southeast Asia. However, surprisingly little work has been done in the countries of Djibouti and Yemen, both of which hold the key to our understanding of the chronological, paleoenvironmental and adaptive contexts of such early movements. As a result, detailed and accurate information about hominin subsistence, raw material exploitation, climatic adaptations, and the rate and success of early dispersals in such regions still remain poorly understood. Being a part of the Rift Valley, Djibouti shows great potential for paleoanthropological research in parity with the rest of East Africa. Only one Oldowan site, near Lake Abbe, is currently known and dated to between 1.6 and 1.3 Ma by ESR, with presumably butchered remains of Elephas recki ileretensis and hundreds of artifacts on lavas. In addition, a complete articulated skeleton of Elephas recki recki was found in clays of the comparatively younger Gobaad Formation. Previous investigators have also reported a fragmentary maxilla, attributed to an older form of Homo sapiens and dated to similar to 250 Ka, from the valley of the Dagadle Wadi. In Yemen and other parts of the Arabian Peninsula, archaeological investigations by numerous workers have yielded an abundance of Lower Paleolithic sites near the mountains and on fan surfaces, particularly in the Hadramaut area and the Tihama Plains, including the Al-Guza cave site with possible Oldowan artifacts. Surveys 25 to 40 km inland from the Gulf of Aden, South of Yemen, have yielded almost 40 Lower Paleolithic sites, including several Oldowan sites. Despite these commendable efforts, however, vast parts of both Djibouti and Yemen remain largely unexplored and much of the known evidence from both regions has not been absolutely dated or excavated. Until this is done, such data lend little support to early dispersal models that incorporate a southern coastal route to Southeast Asia during the Late Pliocene. This paper attempts to highlight and assess the earliest-known Mode 1 and Mode 2 evidence from Djibouti and Yemen, and correlate them with the available Plio-Pleistocene environmental records of the Bab al-Mandab region. Another objective is to provide a detailed synthesis of the original French publications on the paleoanthropological evidence from Djibouti, thus making it more widely available for comparative purposes.
C1 [Chauhan, Parth R.] Stone Age Inst, Bloomington, IN 47407 USA.
EM pchauhan@indiana.edu
RI Chauhan, Parth/CAF-5641-2022
CR Abbate E, 1998, NATURE, V393, P458, DOI 10.1038/30954
   AMIRKHANOV H, 1994, ARAB ARCHAEOL EPIGR, V5, P217, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0471.1994.tb00069.x
   Amirkhanov HA, 2006, STONE AGE S ARABIA
   AMIRKHANOV HA, 1999, ANTHROPOLOGIE, V37, P45
   [Anonymous], 1992, B SOC PREHISTORIQUE
   [Anonymous], 2006, Afr. Archaeol. Rev.
   [Anonymous], ATLATL
   Antón SC, 2004, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V33, P271, DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.144024
   Antón SC, 2002, J HUM EVOL, V43, P773, DOI 10.1006/jhev.2002.0602
   ASFAW B, 1992, NATURE, V360, P732, DOI 10.1038/360732a0
   Asfaw B, 2002, NATURE, V416, P317, DOI 10.1038/416317a
   Bar-Yosef O, 2001, QUATERN INT, V75, P19, DOI 10.1016/S1040-6182(00)00074-4
   Bates MR, 2007, J ARCHAEOL SCI, V34, P1537, DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2007.02.027
   Berthelet A, 2002, ANTHROPOLOGIE, V106, P1
   Berthelet A, 2001, CR ACAD SCI II A, V332, P411, DOI 10.1016/S1251-8050(01)01551-8
   Berthelet A., 2001, The World of Elephants. International Congress Proceedings, P176
   BEYDOUN ZR, 1970, PHILOS TR R SOC S-A, V267, P267, DOI 10.1098/rsta.1970.0036
   BULGARELLI GM, 1986, E W, V36, P419
   Caton-Thompson G, 1939, GEOGR J, V93, P18, DOI 10.2307/1787159
   CATONTHOMPSON G, 1953, P PREHIST SOC, V19, P189
   CATONTHOMPSON G, 1957, P 3 PAN AFR C PREH L, P380
   CHAIVAILLON J, 2001, WORLD ELEPHANTS, P191
   Chapman R.W., 1978, QUATERNARY PERIOD SA, V1, P4
   Chauhan PR, 2007, J ANTHROPOL ARCHAEOL, V26, P412, DOI 10.1016/j.jaa.2007.01.001
   CHAVAILLON J, 1987, ARQUEOLOGIA, V15, P64
   Clark J., 1994, INTEGRATIVE PATHS, P451
   CLARK JD, 1994, SCIENCE, V264, P1907, DOI 10.1126/science.8009220
   Coleman R.G., 1974, INITIAL REPORTS DEEP, V23, P813
   COURTILLOT V, 1984, J GEOPHYS RES, V89, P3315, DOI 10.1029/JB089iB05p03315
   de Lumley H, 2005, ANTHROPOLOGIE, V109, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.anthro.2005.02.011
   DEBONIS L, 1984, CR ACAD SCI II, V299, P1097
   DEBONIS L, 1988, B SOC GEOL FR, V4, P323
   Delagnes A, 2006, J ANTHROPOL ARCHAEOL, V25, P448, DOI 10.1016/j.jaa.2006.03.002
   DEMAIGRET A, 1983, E W, V33, P342
   DeMenocal PB, 2004, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V220, P3, DOI 10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00003-2
   Dennell R, 2005, NATURE, V438, P1099, DOI 10.1038/nature04259
   Dennell R, 2003, J HUM EVOL, V45, P421, DOI 10.1016/j.jhevol.2003.09.006
   Dennell Robin W., 2004, Asian Perspectives, V43, P205, DOI 10.1353/asi.2004.0018
   DENNELL RW, 1988, ANTIQUITY, V62, P98, DOI 10.1017/S0003598X00073555
   Derricourt R, 2005, J WORLD PREHIST, V19, P119, DOI 10.1007/s10963-006-9002-z
   Doe B., 1971, SO ARABIA
   Edgell H S., 2006, Arabian Deserts. Nature, Origin
   FAURE M, 1997, CR HEBD ACAD SCI, P1017
   Feakins SJ, 2005, GEOLOGY, V33, P977, DOI 10.1130/G21814.1
   Field JS, 2005, J WORLD PREHIST, V19, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10963-005-9000-6
   Gabunia L, 2000, SCIENCE, V288, P1019, DOI 10.1126/science.288.5468.1019
   GOODENOUGH W, 1939, GEOGR J, V93, P36
   HUGHES GW, 1992, J PETROL GEOL, V15, P135, DOI 10.1111/j.1747-5457.1992.tb00959.x
   Hurcombe L., 2004, BAR International Series, V1265, P222
   Isaac G.L., 1997, Koobi Fora Research Projec: Volume 5 Plio-Pleisotocene Archeaology, V5
   KIBUNJIA M, 1992, J HUM EVOL, V23, P431, DOI 10.1016/0047-2484(92)90091-M
   LANGBROEK M, 2004, ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPOR, V1244
   Larick R, 1996, AM SCI, V84, P538
   Leakey MD, 1971, OLDUVAI GORGE, V3
   Martínez-Navarro B, 2004, RIV ITAL PALEONTOL S, V110, P61, DOI 10.13130/2039-4942/5765
   Martinez-Navarro Bienvenido, 2004, P37
   Mithen S, 2002, J HUM EVOL, V43, P433, DOI 10.1006/jhev.2002.0584
   O'Regan H, 2006, COUR FOR SEKENBG, V256, P305
   Petraglia MD, 2005, GEOL SOC SPEC PUBL, V247, P305, DOI 10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.247.01.18
   Petraglia MD, 2003, ANTIQUITY, V77, P671, DOI 10.1017/S0003598X00061639
   Petraglia MD, 2003, J WORLD PREHIST, V17, P141, DOI 10.1023/A:1025849206519
   Plummer T, 2004, YEARB PHYS ANTHROPOL, V47, P118, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.20157
   Roche H, 2003, CR PALEVOL, V2, P663, DOI 10.1016/j.crpv.2003.06.001
   Rose JI, 2004, CURR ANTHROPOL, V45, P551, DOI 10.1086/423500
   SAHNOUNI M, 2007, ADUMATU, V15, P7
   Schick K.D., 2006, The Oldowan: Case Studies into the Earliest Stone Age, P3
   Semaw S, 1997, NATURE, V385, P333, DOI 10.1038/385333a0
   SWISHER CC, 1994, SCIENCE, V263, P1118, DOI 10.1126/science.8108729
   TATTERSALL I, 1995, YEMEN UPDATE, V37, P21
   Thomas H, 1998, CR ACAD SCI II A, V326, P145, DOI 10.1016/S1251-8050(97)87459-9
   Todd NE, 2005, QUATERN INT, V126, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2004.04.015
   Turner A, 1999, ANTIQUITY, V73, P563, DOI 10.1017/S0003598X0006511X
   Turner Alan, 2007, P421, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-33761-4_15
   VANBEEK G, 1964, PUBLICATION SMITHSON, V4587, P521
   Vrba Elisabeth S., 2007, P1441, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-33761-4_47
   Werner NY, 2004, BIOL J LINN SOC, V82, P103, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00321.x
   Whalen N.M., 1992, Paleorient, V17, P129
   Whalen N.M., 1990, ATLAL J SAUDI ARABIA, V13, P43
   Whalen NM, 1997, ARAB ARCHAEOL EPIGR, V8, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0471.1997.tb00146.x
   Whalen NormanM., 1989, Atlal, V12, P59
   Whitmarsh R.B., 1974, INITIAL RESULTS DEEP, V23, P1180
   Whybrow P.J., 1999, Fossil Vertebrates of Arabia, with Emphasis on the Late Miocene Faunas, Geology, and Palaeoenvironments of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
   WoldeGabriel G, 2000, GEOL S AM S, P83
   Zhu RX, 2003, EARTH-SCI REV, V61, P341, DOI 10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00132-0
   ZIMMERMAN P.C., 2000, YEMEN UPDATE, V42, P27
   ZUMBO V, 1995, J VOLCANOL GEOTH RES, V65, P281, DOI 10.1016/0377-0273(94)00107-R
NR 86
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 0
U2 8
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA PO BOX 17, 3300 AA DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 1877-9077
BN 978-1-4020-9060-8; 978-1-4020-9059-2
J9 VERTEBR PALEOBIOL PA
JI Vertebr. Paleobiol. Paleoanthropol.
PY 2009
BP 49
EP 59
DI 10.1007/978-1-4020-9060-8_5
PG 11
WC Anthropology; Archaeology; Paleontology
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Science &amp; Humanities (CPCI-SSH)
SC Anthropology; Archaeology; Paleontology
GA BLT81
UT WOS:000270993400005
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Olson, M
   Rosell, JA
   Martínez-Pérez, C
   León-Gómez, C
   Fajardo, A
   Isnard, S
   Cervantes-Alcayde, MA
   Echeverría, A
   Figueroa-Abundiz, VA
   Segovia, A
   Trueba, S
   Vázquez-Segovia, K
AF Olson, Mark
   Rosell, Julieta A.
   Martinez-Perez, Cecilia
   Leon-Gomez, Calixto
   Fajardo, Alex
   Isnard, Sandrine
   Angelica Cervantes-Alcayde, Maria
   Echeverria, Alberto
   Figueroa-Abundiz, Victor A.
   Segovia, Ali
   Trueba, Santiago
   Vazquez-Segovia, Karen
TI Xylem vessel-diameter-shoot-length scaling: ecological significance of
   porosity types and other traits
SO ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS
LA English
DT Article
DE allometry; leaf phenology; porosity type; scalariform perforation plate;
   wood density; xylem vessel
ID WOOD ANATOMY; INDUCED EMBOLISM; WATER TRANSPORT; HYDRAULIC ARCHITECTURE;
   CAVITATION RESISTANCE; SUCCESSIVE CAMBIA; VASCULAR PLANTS; TROPICAL
   FOREST; SECONDARY XYLEM; CLIMATE-CHANGE
AB Flowering plants predominantly conduct water in tubes known as vessels, with vessel diameter playing a crucial role in plant adaptation to climate and reactions to climate change. The importance of vessels makes it essential to understand how and why vessel diameter, plant height, and other ecological factors are interrelated. Although shoot length is by far the main driver of variation in mean vessel diameter across angiosperms, much remains to be understood regarding the factors accounting for the abundant variation around the y-axis in plots of mean species vessel diameter against shoot length. Here, we explore the potential role of porosity types, wood density, leaf phenology, background imperforate tracheary element type, vasicentric tracheids, vascular tracheids, perforation plate type, and successive cambia in causing variation in the y-intercept or slope of the mean species vessel-diameter- and vessel-density-shoot-length associations at the shoot tip and base. We detected numerous cases of ecologically significant variation. For example, latewood vessels of ring porous species scale with a lower slope than earlywood, i.e., latewood vessels are relatively narrow in taller plants. This pattern is likely the result of selection favoring freezing-induced embolism resistance via narrow vessels. Wood density was negatively associated with vessel diameter, with low wood density plants having wider vessels for a given height. Species with scalariform perforation plates scale with a lower shoot base vessel-diameter-shoot-length slope, likely reflecting selection against scalariform plates in wide vessels. In other cases, functional groups scaled similarly. For example, species with successive cambia did not differ from those with conventional single cambia in their mean vessel-diameter-shoot-length scaling, rejecting our prediction that species with successive cambia should have narrower vessels for a given shoot length. They did, however, have fewer vessels per unit shoot cross-sectional area than plants of similar heights, likely because vessels have longer functional lifespans (and therefore are fewer) in species with successive cambia. Our methods illustrate how vessel diameter can be studied taking shoot length into account to detect ecologically important variation and construct theory regarding plant adaptation via the hydraulic system that includes plant size as a vital element.
C1 [Olson, Mark; Martinez-Perez, Cecilia; Leon-Gomez, Calixto; Angelica Cervantes-Alcayde, Maria; Echeverria, Alberto; Figueroa-Abundiz, Victor A.; Segovia, Ali] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Biol, Tercer Circuito S-N Ciudad Univ, Ciudad De Mexico 04510, Mexico.
   [Rosell, Julieta A.; Vazquez-Segovia, Karen] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ecol, Lab Nacl Ciencias Sostenibilidad, Tercer Circuito S-N Ciudad Univ, Ciudad De Mexico 04510, Mexico.
   [Fajardo, Alex] Ctr Invest Cosistemas Patagonia CIEP, Camino Baguales S-N, Coyhaique 5951601, Chile.
   [Isnard, Sandrine; Trueba, Santiago] Univ Montpellier, Bot & Modelisat Architecture Plantes Vegetat, Inst Natl Rech Agronom, Ctr Cooperat Int Rech Agronom Dev,Inst Rech Dev,C, F-34398 Montpellier, France.
   [Isnard, Sandrine; Trueba, Santiago] Herbier Nouvelle Caledonia, Inst Rech Pourle Dev, Bot & Modelisat Architecture Plantes Vegetat, Noumea 98848, New Caledonia.
   [Trueba, Santiago] Yale Univ, Sch Forestry & Environm Studies, New Haven, CT 06511 USA.
C3 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico; Universidad Nacional Autonoma
   de Mexico; Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement (IRD); CIRAD;
   INRAE; Universite de Montpellier; Yale University
RP Olson, M (corresponding author), Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Biol, Tercer Circuito S-N Ciudad Univ, Ciudad De Mexico 04510, Mexico.
EM molson@ib.unam.mx
RI Rosell, Julieta/AAR-5792-2020; Segovia, Ali/KGK-9829-2024; Isnard,
   Sandrine/L-2216-2017; Martinez, Cecilia/AAH-8474-2020
OI Fajardo, Alex/0000-0002-2202-6207; Trueba, Santiago/0000-0001-8218-957X;
   Martinez-Perez, Cecilia/0000-0002-8729-1781; Isnard,
   Sandrine/0000-0003-3142-2671; Rosell, Julieta A./0000-0001-5741-8027;
   Segovia-Rivas, Ali/0000-0001-5500-5309; Olson, Mark
   Earl/0000-0003-3715-4567
FU PAPIIT-UNAM [IN210719, IN210220]; CONACyT [A1-S-26934, 237061]; UC-MEXUS
   [CN-15-1428]; Programa de Becas Posdoctorales, DGAPAUNAM
FX We thank Diana Soriano for assistance and discussion. This work was
   supported by PAPIIT-UNAM [grant numbers IN210719 and IN210220]; CONACyT
   [grant numbers A1-S-26934 and 237061]; UC-MEXUS [grant number
   CN-15-1428]; and a postdoctoral fellowship to C. Martinez-Perez from the
   Programa de Becas Posdoctorales, DGAPAUNAM.
CR Anfodillo T, 2006, NEW PHYTOL, V169, P279, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01587.x
   Angyalossy V, 2012, PLANT ECOL DIVERS, V5, P167, DOI 10.1080/17550874.2011.615574
   [Anonymous], 2014, ARXIV PREPRINT ARXIV
   [Anonymous], 1975, ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIE
   Apgaua DMG, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0130799
   Bailey IW, 1918, P AM ACAD ARTS SCI, V54, P149, DOI 10.2307/20025747
   Ball MC, 2006, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V29, P729, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01426.x
   Berner LT, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P3449, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12304
   Bettiati D, 2012, TREE PHYSIOL, V32, P171, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpr137
   Brodersen C, 2014, PLANT PHYSIOL, V165, P895, DOI 10.1104/pp.113.226522
   Brodersen CR, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V217, P117, DOI 10.1111/nph.14811
   Brodersen CR, 2013, FRONT PLANT SCI, V4, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2013.00108
   Byng JW, 2016, BOT J LINN SOC, V181, P1, DOI [10.1111/boj.12385, 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x]
   Cai J, 2010, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V33, P1059, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02127.x
   CARLQUIST S, 1985, IAWA BULL, V6, P319, DOI 10.1163/22941932-90000960
   CARLQUIST S, 1985, Aliso, V11, P37
   CARLQUIST S, 1987, Aliso, V11, P451
   CARLQUIST S, 1984, Aliso, V10, P505
   CARLQUIST S, 1980, Aliso, V9, P499
   Carlquist S., 2001, COMP WOOD ANATOMY SY, DOI [10.1007/978-3-662-04578-7, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-04578-7]
   Carlquist S, 2007, J TORREY BOT SOC, V134, P301, DOI 10.3159/1095-5674(2007)134[301:SCROHD]2.0.CO;2
   Carlquist Sherwin, 2018, Aliso, V36, P1, DOI 10.5642/aliso.20183601.02
   Carlquist S, 2014, BOT J LINN SOC, V174, P44, DOI 10.1111/boj.12107
   Cavender-Bares J, 2005, NEW PHYTOL, V168, P597, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01555.x
   Cavender-Bares J, 2001, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V24, P1243, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00797.x
   Cavender-Bares Jeannine, 2005, P401, DOI 10.1016/B978-012088457-5/50021-6
   Chave J, 2009, ECOL LETT, V12, P351, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x
   Chavent M, 2012, ADV DATA ANAL CLASSI, V6, P131, DOI 10.1007/s11634-012-0105-3
   Chen JW, 2009, ECOL RES, V24, P65, DOI 10.1007/s11284-008-0482-4
   Christman MA, 2010, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V33, P431, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02094.x
   Christoffersen BO, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P4227, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-4227-2016
   COCHARD H, 1990, TREE PHYSIOL, V6, P393, DOI 10.1093/treephys/6.4.393
   Comstock JP, 2000, NEW PHYTOL, V148, P195, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00763.x
   Davis SD, 1999, AM J BOT, V86, P1367, DOI 10.2307/2656919
   Devi N, 2008, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V14, P1581, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01583.x
   Donovan LA, 2011, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V26, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2010.11.011
   Echeverría A, 2019, J EXP BOT, V70, P5765, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erz329
   Edwards EJ, 2014, J ECOL, V102, P328, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12209
   ELLMORE GS, 1986, AM J BOT, V73, P1771, DOI 10.2307/2444244
   Enquist BJ, 2003, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V26, P151, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00987.x
   Fajardo A, 2020, NEW PHYTOL, V225, P2347, DOI 10.1111/nph.16287
   Frost FH, 1930, BOT GAZ, V89, P67, DOI 10.1086/334026
   Frost FH, 1931, BOT GAZ, V91, P0088, DOI 10.1086/334128
   Montes-Cartas C, 2017, EVOL DEV, V19, P111, DOI 10.1111/ede.12225
   Gamache I, 2004, J ECOL, V92, P835, DOI 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00913.x
   Greenwood S, 2017, ECOL LETT, V20, P539, DOI 10.1111/ele.12748
   Hacke UG, 2001, PERSPECT PLANT ECOL, V4, P97, DOI 10.1078/1433-8319-00017
   Hacke UG, 2001, OECOLOGIA, V126, P457, DOI 10.1007/s004420100628
   Hallinger M, 2010, NEW PHYTOL, V186, P890, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03223.x
   HELLKVIST J, 1974, J APPL ECOL, V11, P637, DOI 10.2307/2402215
   Isnard S, 2015, ECOLOGY OF LIANAS, P221
   Isnard S, 2009, AM J BOT, V96, P1205, DOI 10.3732/ajb.0900045
   Jacobsen AL, 2005, PLANT PHYSIOL, V139, P546, DOI 10.1104/pp.104.058404
   Jacobsen AL, 2007, J ECOL, V95, P171, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01186.x
   Jacobsen AL, 2019, IAWA J, V40, P4, DOI 10.1163/22941932-40190233
   Jacobsen AL, 2018, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V41, P2715, DOI 10.1111/pce.13446
   Jacobsen AL, 2016, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V39, P2473, DOI 10.1111/pce.12802
   Jansen S, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P8833, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0402621101
   JOHANSEN DONALD ALEXANDER, 1940
   Johnson D, 2018, AM J BOT, V105, P186, DOI 10.1002/ajb2.1035
   Barotto AJ, 2016, TREE PHYSIOL, V36, P1485, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpw072
   Kitin P, 2016, IAWA J, V37, P315, DOI 10.1163/22941932-20160136
   Kocacinar F, 2003, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V26, P2015, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2003.01119.x
   Langan SJ, 1997, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V20, P425, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-94.x
   Lazzarin M, 2016, IAWA J, V37, P172, DOI 10.1163/22941932-20160129
   Lechthaler S, 2019, TREE PHYSIOL, V39, P495, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpy110
   Lens F, 2013, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V16, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2013.02.005
   Lens F, 2011, NEW PHYTOL, V190, P709, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03518.x
   Lin YS, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P459, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2550, 10.1038/nclimate2550]
   Liu H, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aav1332
   Magallón S, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V207, P437, DOI 10.1111/nph.13264
   Martínez-Vilalta J, 2002, AM J BOT, V89, P1916, DOI 10.3732/ajb.89.12.1916
   Martínez-Vilalta J, 2012, AM J BOT, V99, P1189, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1100384
   Mayr S, 2002, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V115, P74, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1150108.x
   Mayr S, 2010, NEW PHYTOL, V185, P1016, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03133.x
   McCulloh K, 2010, NEW PHYTOL, V186, P439, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03181.x
   McCulloh KA, 2019, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V42, P2789, DOI 10.1111/pce.13607
   Medeiros JS, 2019, NEW PHYTOL, V221, P1802, DOI 10.1111/nph.15536
   Medeiros JS, 2014, AM J BOT, V101, P598, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1400046
   Méndez-Alonzo R, 2013, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V27, P745, DOI 10.1007/s00468-012-0829-x
   Méndez-Alonzo R, 2012, ECOLOGY, V93, P2397, DOI 10.1890/11-1213.1
   Metcalfe C. R., 1950, Anatomy of the dicotyledons, Vol. 2
   Michaletz ST, 2014, NATURE, V512, P39, DOI 10.1038/nature13470
   Morris H, 2018, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V41, P245, DOI 10.1111/pce.13091
   Nardini A, 2011, PLANT SCI, V180, P604, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.12.011
   Olson M., 2019, PERSPECTIVES EVOLUTI, P123
   Olson ME, 2019, EVOL DEV, V21, P59, DOI 10.1111/ede.12279
   Olson ME, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P7551, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1721728115
   Olson ME, 2018, ANN BOT-LONDON, V122, P583, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcy089
   Olson ME, 2015, Q REV BIOL, V90, P167, DOI 10.1086/681438
   Olson ME, 2014, ECOL LETT, V17, P988, DOI 10.1111/ele.12302
   Olson ME, 2014, NEW PHYTOL, V203, P7, DOI 10.1111/nph.12716
   Olson ME, 2013, INT J PLANT SCI, V174, P1062, DOI 10.1086/671432
   Olson ME, 2013, NEW PHYTOL, V197, P1204, DOI 10.1111/nph.12097
   Olson ME, 2012, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V27, P278, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.12.005
   Pérez-de-Lis G, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V248, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.09.022
   Petit G, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V177, P653, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02291.x
   Petit G, 2014, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V28, P915, DOI 10.1007/s00468-014-1006-1
   Petit G, 2010, NEW PHYTOL, V187, P1146, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03304.x
   Petit G, 2009, J THEOR BIOL, V259, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.03.007
   Pfautsch S, 2018, ANN BOT-LONDON, V121, P129, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcx137
   Pittermann J, 2006, PLANT PHYSIOL, V140, P374, DOI 10.1104/pp.105.067900
   Pittermann J, 2003, TREE PHYSIOL, V23, P907, DOI 10.1093/treephys/23.13.907
   Pockman WT, 1997, OECOLOGIA, V109, P19, DOI 10.1007/s004420050053
   Pratt R.B., 2015, Functional and ecological xylem anatomy, P189, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15783-27
   Pratt RB, 2017, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V40, P897, DOI 10.1111/pce.12862
   Robert EMR, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016558
   Roddy AB, 2019, PEERJ, V7, DOI 10.7717/peerj.6835
   Rodriguez-Zaccaro FD, 2019, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V42, P1816, DOI 10.1111/pce.13528
   Rosell JA, 2007, BOT J LINN SOC, V154, P331, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00667.x
   Rosell JA, 2019, J EXP BOT, V70, P5990, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erz362
   Rosell JA, 2017, NEW PHYTOL, V215, P569, DOI 10.1111/nph.14628
   Rosell JA, 2017, CURR FOR REP, V3, P46, DOI 10.1007/s40725-017-0049-0
   Rosell JA, 2014, PERSPECT PLANT ECOL, V16, P288, DOI 10.1016/j.ppees.2014.08.001
   Salleo S, 2004, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V27, P1065, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01211.x
   Salleo S, 2006, FUNCT PLANT BIOL, V33, P1063, DOI 10.1071/FP06149
   Sano Y, 2011, ANN BOT-LONDON, V107, P953, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcr042
   Savage JA, 2013, ECOLOGY, V94, P1708, DOI 10.1890/12-1779.1
   Schenk HJ, 2015, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V20, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.01.008
   Schulte PJ, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V208, P102, DOI 10.1111/nph.13437
   Selaya NG, 2010, ECOLOGY, V91, P1102, DOI 10.1890/08-2111.1
   Sevanto S, 2012, FRONT PLANT SCI, V3, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2012.00107
   Soltis DE, 2011, AM J BOT, V98, P704, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1000404
   SPERRY JS, 1994, ECOLOGY, V75, P1736, DOI 10.2307/1939633
   Sperry JS, 2005, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V28, P456, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01287.x
   Stephenson NL, 2014, NATURE, V507, P90, DOI 10.1038/nature12914
   Stuart SA, 2007, NEW PHYTOL, V173, P576, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01938.x
   Sturm M, 2001, NATURE, V411, P546, DOI 10.1038/35079180
   Trueba S, 2019, J EXP BOT, V70, P3227, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erz133
   TYREE MT, 1991, NEW PHYTOL, V119, P345, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1991.tb00035.x
   Venturas MD, 2016, TREE PHYSIOL, V36, P1247, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpw055
   Vogel S., 2003, Comparative Biomechanics: Life's Physical World
   WANG J, 1992, FUNCT ECOL, V6, P469, DOI 10.2307/2389285
   Warwick NWM, 2017, ANN BOT-LONDON, V119, P1249, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcx019
   West GB, 1999, NATURE, V400, P664, DOI 10.1038/23251
   West GB, 1997, SCIENCE, V276, P122, DOI 10.1126/science.276.5309.122
   Wheeler EA, 2007, IAWA J, V28, P229, DOI 10.1163/22941932-90001638
   Wheeler TD, 2008, NATURE, V455, P208, DOI 10.1038/nature07226
   Williams CB, 2019, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V33, P1299, DOI 10.1007/s00468-019-01859-w
   Williamson GB, 2012, AM J BOT, V99, P1010, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1100516
   Williamson GB, 2010, AM J BOT, V97, P519, DOI 10.3732/ajb.0900243
   Wolfe BT, 2016, NEW PHYTOL, V212, P1007, DOI 10.1111/nph.14087
   Wyka TP, 2019, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V166, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103798
   Zach A, 2010, FLORA, V205, P506, DOI 10.1016/j.flora.2009.12.008
   Zanne AE, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V218, P1697, DOI 10.1111/nph.15114
   Zanne AE, 2014, NATURE, V506, P89, DOI 10.1038/nature12872
   Zanne AE, 2010, AM J BOT, V97, P207, DOI 10.3732/ajb.0900178
   Zieminska K, 2013, AOB PLANTS, V5, DOI 10.1093/aobpla/plt046
   ,, 1989, IAWA Bulletin, V10, P219
NR 149
TC 59
Z9 61
U1 2
U2 63
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0012-9615
EI 1557-7015
J9 ECOL MONOGR
JI Ecol. Monogr.
PD AUG
PY 2020
VL 90
IS 3
DI 10.1002/ecm.1410
EA MAY 2020
PG 32
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA NA4LX
UT WOS:000531920300001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Earll, MM
   Henson, WR
   Lockwood, B
   Boyce, SE
AF Earll, Marisa M.
   Henson, Wesley R.
   Lockwood, Brian
   Boyce, Scott E.
TI Evaluating seawater intrusion forecast uncertainty under climate change
   in the Pajaro Valley, California
SO JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Groundwater; Seawater intrusion; Climate change; Hydrologic modeling;
   Groundwater management; Uncertainty analysis
ID SEA-LEVEL RISE; MULTIMODEL ENSEMBLE; SALTWATER INTRUSION; COASTAL
   AQUIFERS; CHANGE IMPACTS; MANAGEMENT; PROJECTIONS; HYDROLOGY; RUNOFF;
   MODELS
AB Climate change and climate variability impacts such as rising sea levels have the potential to exacerbate seawater intrusion and the strain on coastal freshwater resources in already stressed groundwater basins such as those in the Pajaro Valley groundwater basin, California. Regional hydrologic models are often coupled with climate projections to forecast future hydrologic conditions and inform adaptive resources management strategies. However, there is high uncertainty in the future projections of water resources due to uncertainties from downscaling global general circulation models (GCMs) to local scale climate change projections, future land use changes, and the inherent uncertainty of developed hydrologic models. Future climate projections and the magnitude of their influence on modeled hydrologic drivers are highly variable. Therefore, to develop a forecast model, an ensemble of different projections can be used to capture a wider range of basin responses and the associated uncertainties in the modeled forecasts. Understanding the reliability and uncertainty of forecasts is important for developing climate adaptation strategies such as developing protective thresholds, particularly at the basin scale where the impacts are felt, and adaptation is implemented. To demonstrate this, an uncertainty analysis of groundwater level and seawater intrusion forecasts for the Pajaro Valley groundwater basin was performed using an ensemble of three future climate projections with the Pajaro Valley Integrated Hydrologic Model (PVIHM) and the first -order second moment (FOSM) method. FOSM uncertainty analysis of hydrologic forecasts across a multi-GCM climate ensemble provides an upper and lower bound of potential impacts of climate change on sustainability targets related to mitigating seawater intrusion. The groundwater level forecasts ' narrow range of variability can help policymakers in adaptation planning by constraining possible outcomes to a focused range for risk -management decisions. However, less than one-third of groundwater level forecasts met the current protection thresholds to prevent chronic lowering of groundwater. Therefore, sustainability targets may need to be reassessed. Relative to groundwater level changes, the seawater intrusion forecasts had larger uncertainty due to the GCM climate projections and the simulated hydrologic response that were compounded by the propagation of scaling and bias from the GCMs and model simplifications in simulating the coastal boundary.
C1 [Earll, Marisa M.; Henson, Wesley R.; Boyce, Scott E.] US Geol Survey, Calif Water Sci Ctr, 4165 Spruance Rd Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92115 USA.
   [Lockwood, Brian] Pajaro Valley Water Management Agcy, 36 Brennan St, Watsonville, CA 95076 USA.
C3 United States Department of the Interior; United States Geological
   Survey
RP Earll, MM (corresponding author), US Geol Survey, Calif Water Sci Ctr, 4165 Spruance Rd Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92115 USA.
EM mearll@usgs.gov; whenson@usgs.gov; lockwood@pvwater.org
RI Henson, Wesley/D-4083-2016
OI Henson, Wesley/0000-0003-4962-5565
FU Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency; U.S. Geological Survey California
   Water Science Center
FX The authors would like to acknowledge Randall Hanson for developing the
   Pajaro Valley Hydrologic Model and thank Brian Lockwood and Casey Meusel
   of the Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency for their collaboration on
   the project. This work was co-funded by Pajaro Valley Water Management
   Agency and the U.S. Geological Survey California Water Science Center.
   Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes
   only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
CR Ajami NK, 2006, J HYDROMETEOROL, V7, P755, DOI 10.1175/JHM519.1
   Angew M.R.S., 2011, Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations, V430, DOI [10.1038/nature02770.1, DOI 10.1038/NATURE02770.1]
   [Anonymous], 2008, Empiricalstatistical downscaling
   Ataie-Ashtiani B, 2011, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V25, P165, DOI 10.1007/s11269-010-9693-x
   Bastola S, 2011, ADV WATER RESOUR, V34, P562, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.01.008
   Bergström S, 2001, CLIM RES, V16, P101, DOI 10.3354/cr016101
   Bhandari R., 2020, OPEN WATER J, V6, P5
   Bosshard T, 2013, WATER RESOUR RES, V49, P1523, DOI 10.1029/2011WR011533
   Boyce S.E., 2020, Techniques and Methods, DOI [10.3133/tm6A60, DOI 10.3133/TM6A60]
   Brakefield L. K., 2015, Scientific Investigations Report, DOI [10.3133/sir20155081, DOI 10.3133/SIR20155081]
   California Department of Water Resources Office of State Climatology, 2020, HYDROCLIMATE REPORT Water Year 2020
   California State Water Resources Board, 1953, Santa Cruz-Monterey Counties Investigation - Bulletin, V5
   Carrera J, 2010, HYDROGEOL J, V18, P131, DOI 10.1007/s10040-009-0524-1
   Carter T., 2010, IPCC EXP M ASS COMB, P25
   Cayan D., 2009, Climate Change Scenarios and Sea Level Rise Estimates for the California Climate Change Scenarios Assessment. CEC-500-2009-014-D
   Chang SW, 2011, ADV WATER RESOUR, V34, P1283, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.06.006
   Christensen NS, 2007, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V11, P1417, DOI 10.5194/hess-11-1417-2007
   Coulon C., 2023, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., V2023, P1
   Coulon C, 2021, J HYDROL, V600, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126509
   Council N.S., 2007, A Strategy for Federal Science and States., Technology to Support Water Availability and Quality in the United Technical Report Subcommitee on Water Availability and Quality
   Crosbie RS, 2011, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V38, DOI 10.1029/2011GL047657
   Dausman A.M., 2005, Scientific Investigations Report, DOI DOI 10.3133/SIR20045256
   Dong L, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-26797-5
   DWR C. A., 2008, Managing an Uncertain Future; Climate Change Adaptation Strategies for California's Water
   Earll M.M., 2024, Evaluating Seawater Intrusion Forecast Uncertainty under Climate Change in Pajaro Valley, DOI [10.5066/P9LWQX18, DOI 10.5066/P9LWQX18]
   Essink GHPO, 2010, WATER RESOUR RES, V46, DOI 10.1029/2009WR008719
   Ferré TPA, 2017, GROUNDWATER, V55, P604, DOI 10.1111/gwat.12574
   Feseker T, 2007, HYDROGEOL J, V15, P267, DOI 10.1007/s10040-006-0151-z
   Fienen M.N., 2010, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, P44
   Flint L E., 2021, The basin characterization model-A regional water balance software package (No. 6-H1)
   Foster LK, 2021, GROUNDWATER, V59, P581, DOI 10.1111/gwat.13107
   Goebel M, 2019, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V23, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100602
   Goebel M, 2017, J HYDROL, V551, P746, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.037
   Hanson R.T., 2014, Integrated hydrologic model of Pajaro Valley, Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties, California, V2014-5111, P180, DOI DOI 10.3133/SIR20145111
   Hanson R.T., 2014, US Geological Survey, DOI DOI 10.3133/TM6A51
   Hanson R.T., 2003, Geohydrologic Framework of Recharge and Seawater Intrusion in the Pajaro Valley, Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties, California
   Harbaugh A.W., 1990, A computer program for calculating subregional water budgets using results from the US Geological Survey modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model, DOI DOI 10.3133/OFR90392
   Her Y, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-41334-7
   Herckenrath D, 2011, WATER RESOUR RES, V47, DOI 10.1029/2010WR009342
   Herrera PA, 2022, WIRES WATER, V9, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1569
   Hingray B, 2014, J CLIMATE, V27, P6779, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00629.1
   Hughes J.D., 2016, Scientific Investigations Report 2014-5162, P175
   IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2015, AR6 Synthesis Report Climate Change 2023
   Johns TC, 2011, CLIM DYNAM, V37, P1975, DOI 10.1007/s00382-011-1005-5
   Johnson M.J., 1988, Water-Resources Investigations Report, DOI [10.3133/wri874281, DOI 10.3133/WRI874281]
   Johnson NC, 2020, J CLIMATE, V33, P2427, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0417.1
   Joseph J, 2018, J HYDROL, V566, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.080
   Ketabchi H, 2016, J HYDROL, V535, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.083
   Ketabchi H, 2014, HYDROL PROCESS, V28, P5938, DOI 10.1002/hyp.10059
   Kopp RE, 2014, EARTHS FUTURE, V2, P383, DOI 10.1002/2014EF000239
   Krantz W., 2021, Memorandum on Evaluating Global Climate Models for Studying Regional Climate Change in California
   Langevin C.D., 2003, MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model--Documentation of the SEAWAT-2000 Version with the Variable-Density Flow Process (VDF) and the Integrated MT3DMS Transport Process (IMT)
   Liu YQ, 2007, WATER RESOUR RES, V43, DOI 10.1029/2006WR005756
   Livneh B, 2013, J CLIMATE, V26, P9384, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00508.1
   Lorenz R, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V121, P607, DOI 10.1002/2015JD024053
   Lu D, 2012, WATER RESOUR RES, V48, DOI 10.1029/2011WR011289
   Lynn E., 2015, California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Climate Change Technical Advisory Group (CCTAG), P142
   Lyra A, 2023, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V37, P2625, DOI 10.1007/s11269-022-03392-x
   [Masson-Delmotte V. IPCC IPCC], 2021, Summary for Policy Makers
   Moore C, 2005, WATER RESOUR RES, V41, DOI 10.1029/2004WR003501
   Motz LH, 2009, J HYDROL ENG, V14, P821, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000049
   Mysiak J.E., 2010, The Adaptive Water Resource Management Handbook
   Newsom G., 2021, Recommendations for an Effective Water Rights Response to Climate Change Identification of Data Needs and Recommendations to Incorporate Climate Change into Water Rights Permitting Policies, Procedures, and Methodologies
   Office of Management and Budget, 2003, Circular A-4 (Technical Report United States Office of Management and Budget
   Ojha R., 2014, Modeling and Management of Resources, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584]
   Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency M. & A., 2022, Pajaro Valley Basin Management Plan Groundwater Sustainability Update 2022
   Pierce DW, 2015, J HYDROMETEOROL, V16, P2421, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0236.1
   Pierce DW, 2014, J HYDROMETEOROL, V15, P2558, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0082.1
   Pierce DW, 2013, J CLIMATE, V26, P5879, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00766.1
   Rajabi MM, 2014, ADV WATER RESOUR, V67, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.02.004
   Raje D, 2012, WATER RESOUR RES, V48, DOI 10.1029/2011WR011123
   REILLY TE, 1987, J HYDROL, V89, P169, DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(87)90179-X
   Saeed MM, 2002, NORD HYDROL, V33, P165
   Schertzer D, 2010, HYDROLOG SCI J, V55, P965, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2010.505173
   Sreekanth J, 2014, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V28, P2005, DOI 10.1007/s11269-014-0591-5
   Stocker T., 2010, IPCC expert meeting on assessing and combining multi model climate projections, P25
   Taylor KE, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P485, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
   Team C.W., 2010, Intergovernal Panel Climate Change, V465
   Tebaldi C, 2007, PHILOS T R SOC A, V365, P2053, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2007.2076
   Teng J, 2012, J HYDROMETEOROL, V13, P122, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-11-058.1
   Teutschbein C, 2011, CLIM DYNAM, V37, P2087, DOI 10.1007/s00382-010-0979-8
   Watson TA, 2010, WATER RESOUR RES, V46, DOI 10.1029/2010WR009564
   Weiland FCS, 2012, J HYDROL, V412, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.047
   Welter D. E., 2015, U. S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 7-C12, Techniques and Methods 7-C12, P54, DOI [10.3133/tm7C12, DOI 10.3133/TM7C12]
   Werner AD, 2017, J HYDROL, V551, P819, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.047
   Werner AD, 2013, ADV WATER RESOUR, V51, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.004
   Werner AD, 2009, GROUND WATER, V47, P197, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00535.x
   White J.T., 2020, TECHNIQUES ANDMETHOD, P64, DOI 10.3133/tm7C26
   White JT, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V85, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.08.017
   WIROJANAGUD P, 1985, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V111, P417, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1985)111:3(417)
   Zhao ZW, 2013, WATER SCI ENG, V6, P380, DOI 10.3882/j.issn.1674-2370.2013.04.002
   Zhao ZC, 2011, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V2, P55, DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1248.2011.00055
NR 92
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 7
U2 8
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0022-1694
EI 1879-2707
J9 J HYDROL
JI J. Hydrol.
PD JUN
PY 2024
VL 636
AR 131226
DI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131226
EA MAY 2024
PG 17
WC Engineering, Civil; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Geology; Water Resources
GA SV1A5
UT WOS:001237118200001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Barratt, LJ
   Ortega, SF
   Harper, AL
AF Barratt, Liam J.
   Franco Ortega, Sara
   Harper, Andrea L.
TI Identification of candidate regulators of the response to early heat
   stress in climate-adapted wheat landraces <i>via</i> transcriptomic and
   co-expression network analyses
SO FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE heat; transcriptomics; network analysis; Triticum aestivum; landrace;
   hub gene
ID PROTEIN-QUALITY CONTROL; ABSCISIC-ACID; SHOCK-PROTEIN; FREEZING
   TOLERANCE; HIGH-TEMPERATURE; SALT STRESS; DROUGHT TOLERANCE;
   COLD-ACCLIMATION; OVER-EXPRESSION; PHOSPHATASE 2C
AB <bold>Introduction:</bold> Climate change is likely to lead to not only increased global temperatures but also a more variable climate where unseasonal periods of heat stress are more prevalent. This has been evidenced by the observation of spring-time temperatures approaching 40 degrees C in some of the main spring-wheat producing countries, such as the USA, in recent years. With an optimum growth temperature of around 20 degrees C, wheat is particularly prone to damage by heat stress. A warming climate with increasingly common fluctuations in temperature therefore threatens wheat crops and subsequently the lives and livelihoods of billions of people who depend on the crop for food. To futureproof wheat against a variable climate, a better understanding of the response to early heat stress is required.<bold>Methods:</bold> Here, we utilised DESeq2 to identify 7,827 genes which were differentially expressed in wheat landraces after early heat stress exposure. Candidate hub genes, which may regulate the transcriptional response to early heat stress, were identified via weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and validated by qRT-PCR.<bold>Results:</bold> Two of the most promising candidate hub genes (TraesCS3B02G409300 and TraesCS1B02G384900) may downregulate the expression of genes involved in the drought, salinity, and cold responses-genes which are unlikely to be required under heat stress-as well as photosynthesis genes and stress hormone signalling repressors, respectively. We also suggest a role for a poorly characterised sHSP hub gene (TraesCS4D02G212300), as an activator of the heat stress response, potentially inducing the expression of a vast suite of heat shock proteins and transcription factors known to play key roles in the heat stress response.<bold>Discussion:</bold> The present work represents an exploratory examination of the heat-induced transcriptional change in wheat landrace seedlings and identifies several candidate hub genes which may act as regulators of this response and, thus, may be targets for breeders in the production of thermotolerant wheat varieties.
C1 [Barratt, Liam J.; Franco Ortega, Sara; Harper, Andrea L.] Univ York, Ctr Novel Agr Prod CNAP, Dept Biol, York, England.
C3 University of York - UK
RP Harper, AL (corresponding author), Univ York, Ctr Novel Agr Prod CNAP, Dept Biol, York, England.
EM andrea.harper@york.ac.uk
RI franco, sara/AAN-2615-2021
OI Franco Ortega, Sara/0000-0001-8924-464X
FU Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research
   Council10.13039/501100000268
FX We thank the horticultural staff at the University of York for their
   help in maintaining and growing plants, as well as Sally James and
   Lesley Gilbert from the Technology Facility at the University of York
   for their assistance in assessing RNA quality prior to sequencing, and
   Isaac Reynolds for his advice and assistance during transcriptomic
   analysis.
CR Aalto MK, 2012, PLANT SCI, V182, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.08.009
   Al-Whaibi Mohamed H., 2011, Journal of King Saud University Science, V23, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.jksus.2010.06.022
   Andleeb T, 2023, G3-GENES GENOM GENET, V13, DOI 10.1093/g3journal/jkac275
   [Anonymous], 2018, BUILDING CLIMATE RES
   Assenov Y, 2008, BIOINFORMATICS, V24, P282, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm554
   Azameti MK, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-18625-7
   Babu RC, 2004, PLANT SCI, V166, P855, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.11.023
   Bahieldin A, 2005, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V123, P421, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00470.x
   Barratt LJ, 2023, FRONT PLANT SCI, V14, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2023.1212559
   Barratt LJ, 2023, PLANT J, V115, P614, DOI 10.1111/tpj.16248
   BENJAMINI Y, 1995, J R STAT SOC B, V57, P289, DOI 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
   Bhat JY, 2017, MOL CELL, V67, P744, DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.07.004
   Bolger AM, 2014, BIOINFORMATICS, V30, P2114, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
   Bolt S, 2017, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V40, P108, DOI 10.1111/pce.12838
   Borrill P, 2019, PLANT PHYSIOL, V180, P1740, DOI 10.1104/pp.19.00380
   Boulanger HG, 2023, FRONT MOL BIOSCI, V10, DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1122201
   Cai ZZ, 2020, FRONT GENET, V11, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2020.562937
   Caruana L, 2022, PHOTOSYNTH RES, V152, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11120-022-00897-9
   Chauhan H, 2012, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V35, P1912, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02525.x
   Chen XH, 2014, BBA-PROTEINS PROTEOM, V1844, P818, DOI 10.1016/j.bbapap.2014.02.010
   Chen YS, 2015, PLANT BIOTECHNOL J, V13, P105, DOI 10.1111/pbi.12241
   CHOWDHURY SI, 1978, AUST J AGR RES, V29, P205, DOI 10.1071/AR9780205
   Collins M, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1029
   De Costa WAJM, 2011, J NATL SCI FOUND SRI, V39, P281, DOI 10.4038/jnsfsr.v39i4.3879
   Degen GE, 2021, NEW PHYTOL, V229, P1298, DOI 10.1111/nph.16937
   Do JM, 2023, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/agriculture13050931
   Du Z, 2010, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V38, pW64, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkq310
   Duan SN, 2019, BMC GENOMICS, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12864-019-5617-1
   Easterling DR, 2000, SCIENCE, V289, P2068, DOI 10.1126/science.289.5487.2068
   Fernández-Pérez F, 2015, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V175, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.11.006
   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2023, FAOSTAT: Crops and livestock products
   Gao CQ, 2012, MOL BIOL REP, V39, P4889, DOI 10.1007/s11033-011-1284-2
   Gil KE, 2017, PLANT CELL, V29, P2882, DOI 10.1105/tpc.17.00612
   Girousse C, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0199434
   Gitlin-Domagalska A, 2020, PHARMACEUTICALS-BASE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ph13120421
   Guihur A, 2021, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V44, P2117, DOI 10.1111/pce.13975
   Guo LM, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-58395-8
   Guo M, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00114
   Han SH, 2021, J EXP BOT, V72, P7421, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erab355
   Han SH, 2020, NAT PLANTS, V6, DOI 10.1038/s41477-020-00809-6
   Haokip S W., 2020, J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem, V9, P435
   Hong SW, 2001, PLANT J, V27, P25, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01066.x
   Hu SS, 2020, FRONT PLANT SCI, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2020.00375
   Hu XJ, 2018, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V41, P79, DOI 10.1111/pce.12957
   Huang QJ, 2015, BMC PLANT BIOL, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12870-015-0644-9
   Janka E, 2013, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V67, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.02.025
   Jansson S, 1999, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V4, P236, DOI 10.1016/S1360-1385(99)01419-3
   JANSSON S, 1994, BBA-BIOENERGETICS, V1184, P1, DOI 10.1016/0005-2728(94)90148-1
   Jia FJ, 2014, BIOCHEM BIOPH RES CO, V454, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.10.136
   Jiang CH, 2020, PLANT CELL TISS ORG, V141, P407, DOI 10.1007/s11240-020-01798-2
   Jin J, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0235763
   Joshi CP, 1997, THEOR APPL GENET, V95, P834, DOI 10.1007/s001220050633
   Kantidze OL, 2016, ACTA NATURAE, V8, P75, DOI 10.32607/20758251-2016-8-2-75-78
   Kariola T, 2006, PLANT PHYSIOL, V142, P1559, DOI 10.1104/pp.106.086223
   Kazan K, 2012, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V17, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.10.006
   Khurana N, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054418
   Kim KH, 2012, BIOTECHNOL LETT, V34, P371, DOI 10.1007/s10529-011-0769-3
   Kiyosue T, 1998, BBA-BIOMEMBRANES, V1370, P187, DOI 10.1016/S0005-2736(98)00007-8
   KOBZA J, 1987, PLANT PHYSIOL, V83, P69, DOI 10.1104/pp.83.1.69
   Kotak S, 2007, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V10, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.011
   LANG V, 1992, PLANT MOL BIOL, V20, P951, DOI 10.1007/BF00027165
   LANG V, 1994, PLANT PHYSIOL, V104, P1341, DOI 10.1104/pp.104.4.1341
   Langfelder P, 2008, BMC BIOINFORMATICS, V9, DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559
   Langfelder P, 2012, J STAT SOFTW, V46, P1
   Le Gall Hyacinthe, 2015, Plants-Basel, V4, P112, DOI 10.3390/plants4010112
   Lee MH, 2022, INT J MOL SCI, V23, DOI 10.3390/ijms231810734
   Li JB, 2016, PLANT CELL REP, V35, P1587, DOI 10.1007/s00299-016-1973-3
   Li N, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2020.627969
   Lima RB, 2013, CARBOHYD POLYM, V93, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.015
   Liu R, 2013, J EXP BOT, V64, P5443, DOI 10.1093/jxb/ert307
   Liu X, 2012, BIOCHEM BIOPH RES CO, V422, P710, DOI 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.05.064
   Liu ZS, 2015, BMC PLANT BIOL, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12870-015-0511-8
   Lorenzo O, 2003, PLANT CELL, V15, P165, DOI 10.1105/tpc.007468
   Love MI, 2014, GENOME BIOL, V15, DOI 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
   MANTYLA E, 1995, PLANT PHYSIOL, V107, P141, DOI 10.1104/pp.107.1.141
   Mathur S, 2014, J PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO B, V137, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.01.010
   Matsuoka D, 2015, PLANT MOL BIOL, V87, P565, DOI 10.1007/s11103-015-0295-0
   MAZELIS M, 1957, PLANT PHYSIOL, V32, P591, DOI 10.1104/pp.32.6.591
   McClellan AJ, 2005, NAT CELL BIOL, V7, P736, DOI 10.1038/ncb0805-736
   McLoughlin F, 2019, PLANT PHYSIOL, V180, P1829, DOI 10.1104/pp.19.00263
   Medina J, 1999, PLANT PHYSIOL, V119, P463, DOI 10.1104/pp.119.2.463
   Merino I, 2014, PLANT PHYSIOL, V164, P978, DOI 10.1104/pp.113.225730
   Min JH, 2015, J INTEGR PLANT BIOL, V57, P313, DOI 10.1111/jipb.12246
   Mishra DC, 2021, CEREAL RES COMMUN, V49, P73, DOI 10.1007/s42976-020-00072-7
   Mitula F, 2015, PLANT CELL PHYSIOL, V56, P2351, DOI 10.1093/pcp/pcv146
   Mogk A, 2018, MOL CELL, V69, P214, DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.004
   Murakami T, 2004, MOL BREEDING, V13, P165, DOI 10.1023/B:MOLB.0000018764.30795.c1
   Murphy JM, 2004, NATURE, V430, P768, DOI 10.1038/nature02771
   Nagai T, 2009, PLANT CELL PHYSIOL, V50, P744, DOI 10.1093/pcp/pcp029
   Niu CF, 2012, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V35, P1156, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02480.x
   NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, 2020, Monthly Global Climate Report for May 2020
   NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, 2022, MONTHL GLOB CLIM REP
   NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, 2018, Monthly National Climate Report for May 2018
   NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, 2022, Monthly National Climate Report for Annual 2021
   Patro R, 2017, NAT METHODS, V14, P417, DOI 10.1038/nmeth.4197
   Pfeifer M, 2014, SCIENCE, V345, DOI 10.1126/science.1250091
   Pinski A, 2021, INT J MOL SCI, V22, DOI 10.3390/ijms22136750
   Puhakainen T, 2004, PLANT MOL BIOL, V54, P743, DOI 10.1023/B:PLAN.0000040903.66496.a4
   Qin DD, 2008, BMC GENOMICS, V9, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-9-432
   Qin WQ, 2022, MOL PLANT, V15, P1725, DOI 10.1016/j.molp.2022.09.018
   Queitsch C, 2000, PLANT CELL, V12, P479, DOI 10.1105/tpc.12.4.479
   Rahman MA, 2022, LIFE-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/life12091426
   Rangan P, 2020, J CEREAL SCI, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.jcs.2019.102895
   Rativa AGS, 2020, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.jplph.2020.153307
   Ray DK, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0066428
   Riaz MW, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13052972
   Rohila JS, 2002, PLANT SCI, V163, P525, DOI 10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00155-3
   Roychowdhury R, 2023, FIELD CROP RES, V298, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108948
   SALVUCCI ME, 1985, PHOTOSYNTH RES, V7, P193, DOI 10.1007/BF00037012
   Santner A, 2007, PLANT CELL, V19, P3839, DOI 10.1105/tpc.107.056960
   Sasaki-Sekimoto Y, 2014, PLANT SIGNAL BEHAV, V9, DOI 10.4161/psb.27639
   Scarpeci TE, 2017, J EXP BOT, V68, P673, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erw429
   Seo PJ, 2011, PLANTA, V233, P189, DOI 10.1007/s00425-010-1293-8
   Shaar-Moshe L, 2017, PLANT PHYSIOL, V174, P421, DOI 10.1104/pp.17.00030
   Shannon P, 2003, GENOME RES, V13, P2498, DOI 10.1101/gr.1239303
   Sivamani E, 2000, PLANT SCI, V155, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00247-2
   Soneson Charlotte, 2015, F1000Res, V4, P1521, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.7563.2
   Sperotto RA, 2018, PLANT CELL REP, V37, P347, DOI 10.1007/s00299-017-2234-9
   Stephens M, 2017, BIOSTATISTICS, V18, P275, DOI 10.1093/biostatistics/kxw041
   Sun LP, 2012, PLANT CELL REP, V31, P1473, DOI 10.1007/s00299-012-1262-8
   Tang YW, 2023, SCI REP-UK, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-40006-x
   Team RC, 2021, R LANGUAGE ENV STAT
   Thornton PK, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P3313, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12581
   Tian B, 2018, IN VITRO CELL DEV-PL, V54, P216, DOI 10.1007/s11627-018-9893-2
   Tian FX, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2021.704905
   Tian T, 2017, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V45, pW122, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkx382
   Tian XJ, 2022, NEW PHYTOL, V233, P1719, DOI 10.1111/nph.17865
   Tiwari LD, 2020, PLANT J, V103, P2069, DOI 10.1111/tpj.14883
   Tonsor SJ, 2008, MOL ECOL, V17, P1614, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03690.x
   Tsuda K, 2000, GENES GENET SYST, V75, P179, DOI 10.1266/ggs.75.179
   United States Department of Agriculture - Foreign Agricultural Service, 2023, Grain: World Markets and Trade
   Velichko AK, 2012, MOL BIOL CELL, V23, P3450, DOI 10.1091/mbc.E11-12-1009
   Wager A, 2012, FRONT PLANT SCI, V3, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2012.00041
   Waki T, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-14558-9
   Wang Q, 2021, MOL PLANT, V14, P1012, DOI 10.1016/j.molp.2021.04.012
   Wang QL, 2018, INT J MOL SCI, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijms19030849
   Wang RB, 2019, BMC GENOMICS, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12864-019-6374-x
   Wang WX, 2004, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V9, P244, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.03.006
   Wang XB, 2023, PLANT SCI, V331, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2023.111676
   Wang YB, 2022, GENES-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/genes13061020
   WARDLAW IF, 1989, AUST J AGR RES, V40, P1, DOI 10.1071/AR9890001
   Wigley TML, 2001, SCIENCE, V293, P451, DOI 10.1126/science.1061604
   Wu HC, 2018, FRONT PLANT SCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.01612
   Xu DP, 1996, PLANT PHYSIOL, V110, P249, DOI 10.1104/pp.110.1.249
   Yamaji N, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P11401, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1508987112
   Yamamoto Y, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.01136
   Yang GS, 2018, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V133, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.10.018
   Yang KA, 2006, PLANT SCI, V171, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.03.013
   Yates AD, 2022, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V50, pD996, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkab1007
   Zeng HQ, 2015, FRONT PLANT SCI, V6, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00600
   Zeng ZC, 2022, BMC GENOMICS, V23, DOI 10.1186/s12864-022-08438-3
   Zhai MZ, 2016, J PLANT BIOL, V59, P549, DOI 10.1007/s12374-015-0507-9
   Zhang LY, 2015, PLANT SCI, V236, P214, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.04.014
   Zhao C, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P9326, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1701762114
   Zheng TH, 2019, NEW PHYTOL, V224, P306, DOI 10.1111/nph.16010
   Zhou LA, 2010, BMC PLANT BIOL, V10, DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-10-290
   Zhou YL, 2012, PLANT CELL REP, V31, P379, DOI 10.1007/s00299-011-1173-0
NR 157
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 5
U2 15
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
SN 1664-462X
J9 FRONT PLANT SCI
JI Front. Plant Sci.
PD JAN 3
PY 2024
VL 14
AR 1252885
DI 10.3389/fpls.2023.1252885
PG 16
WC Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences
GA FA2B3
UT WOS:001142946300001
PM 38235195
OA Green Published, Green Accepted, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Dai, YC
   Huang, HQ
   Qing, Y
   Li, JT
   Li, DY
AF Dai, Yunchuan
   Huang, Heqing
   Qing, Yu
   Li, Jiatong
   Li, Dayong
TI Ecological response of an umbrella species to changing climate and land
   use: Habitat conservation for Asiatic black bear in the
   Sichuan-Chongqing Region, Southwestern China
SO ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
LA English
DT Article
DE climate adaptation; climate refugia; dispersal path; Ursus thibetanus;
   vulnerability assessment
ID URSUS-THIBETANUS; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; ADAPTATION STRATEGIES;
   DISTRIBUTION MODELS; EXTINCTION RISK; VULNERABILITY; EVOLUTIONARY;
   REFUGIA; IMPACTS; CONNECTIVITY
AB Climate and land use changes are increasingly recognized as major threats to global biodiversity, with significant impacts on wildlife populations and ecosystems worldwide. The study of how climate and land use changes impact wildlife is of paramount importance for advancing our understanding of ecological processes in the face of global environmental change, informing conservation planning and management, and identifying the mechanisms and thresholds that underlie species' responses to shifting climatic conditions. The Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus) is a prominent umbrella species in a biodiversity hotspot in Southwestern China, and its conservation is vital for safeguarding sympatric species. However, the extent to which this species' habitat may respond to global climate and land use changes is poorly understood, underscoring the need for further investigation. Our goal was to anticipate the potential impacts of upcoming climate and land use changes on the distribution and dispersal patterns of the Asiatic black bear in the Sichuan-Chongqing Region. We used MaxEnt modeling to evaluate habitat vulnerability using three General Circulation Models (GCMs) and three scenarios of climate and land use changes. Subsequently, we used Circuit Theory to identify prospective dispersal paths. Our results revealed that the current area of suitable habitat for the Asiatic black bear was 225,609.59 km(2) (comprising 39.69% of the total study area), but was expected to decrease by -53.1%, -49.48%, and -28.55% under RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5 projection scenarios, respectively. Across all three GCMs, the distribution areas and dispersal paths of the Asiatic black bear were projected to shift to higher altitudes and constrict by the 2070s. Furthermore, the results indicated that the density of dispersal paths would decrease, while the resistance to dispersal would increase across the study area. In order to protect the Asiatic black bear, it is essential to prioritize the protection of climate refugia and dispersal paths. Our findings provide a sound scientific foundation for the allocation of such protected areas in the Sichuan-Chongqing Region that are both effective and adaptive in the face of ongoing global climate and land use changes.
C1 [Dai, Yunchuan] Chongqing Acad Social Sci, Inst Ecol & Environm Resources, Res Ctr Ecol Secur & Green Dev, Chongqing, Peoples R China.
   [Huang, Heqing] Chongqing Acad Ecol & Environm Sci, Chongqing, Peoples R China.
   [Qing, Yu] Chongqing Ind Polytech Coll, Chongqing, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Jiatong] Kaili Univ, Sch Tourism, Kaili, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Dayong] China West Normal Univ, Key Lab Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conserv, Minist Educ, Nanchong, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Dayong] China West Normal Univ, Key Lab Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conserv, Minist Educ, Nanchong 637009, Sichuan, Peoples R China.
C3 Chongqing Industry Polytechnic College; Kaili University; China West
   Normal University; China West Normal University
RP Li, DY (corresponding author), China West Normal Univ, Key Lab Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conserv, Minist Educ, Nanchong 637009, Sichuan, Peoples R China.
EM 980119lsc@163.com
OI Li, Dayong/0000-0002-0480-0078
FU Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program
   [2019QZKK0501]; Youth Innovation Research Team Project of Chongqing
   Academy of Social Sciences [2022D0307]
FX The Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program,
   Grant/Award Number: 2019QZKK0501; The Youth Innovation Research Team
   Project of Chongqing Academy of Social Sciences, Grant/Award Number:
   2022D0307
CR Ahmad F, 2022, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02145
   Ahmadzadeh F, 2008, J NAT HIST, V42, P2379, DOI 10.1080/00222930802262741
   Ali H, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0260031
   Ali U, 2023, PAK J ZOOL, V55, P1273, DOI 10.17582/journal.pjz/20220404120401
   An Y, 2021, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V36, P2059, DOI 10.1007/s10980-020-01027-3
   Ashcroft MB, 2010, J BIOGEOGR, V37, P1407, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02300.x
   Beckmann JP, 2003, J ZOOL, V261, P207, DOI 10.1017/S0952836903004126
   Bista Rabindra, 2013, Zoology and Ecology, V23, P83, DOI 10.1080/21658005.2013.774813
   Boelman NT, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P1508, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12761
   Bosso L, 2022, BIOL INVASIONS, V24, P3169, DOI 10.1007/s10530-022-02838-y
   Bronson FH, 2009, PHILOS T R SOC B, V364, P3331, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2009.0140
   Chen IC, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P1024, DOI 10.1126/science.1206432
   Cheng BS, 2017, FUNCT ECOL, V31, P642, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12759
   Choi Y, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V288, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112400
   Cord AF, 2014, ECOL MODEL, V272, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.09.011
   Dai YC, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P5960, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-16014-7
   Dai YCA, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V777, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146207
   Dai YC, 2019, ECOL EVOL, V9, P13278, DOI 10.1002/ece3.5780
   Dickson BG, 2019, CONSERV BIOL, V33, P239, DOI 10.1111/cobi.13230
   Doko T, 2011, ECOL MODEL, V222, P748, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.11.005
   Duffy JE, 2017, NATURE, V549, P261, DOI 10.1038/nature23886
   Early R, 2011, ECOL LETT, V14, P1125, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01681.x
   Elith J, 2011, DIVERS DISTRIB, V17, P43, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
   Elith J, 2009, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V40, P677, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159
   Escobar LE, 2015, BIOL CONSERV, V191, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.040
   Foden WB, 2019, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V10, DOI 10.1002/wcc.551
   Franklin J., 2010, Mapping Species Distributions: Spatial Inference and Prediction
   Galatowitsch S, 2009, BIOL CONSERV, V142, P2012, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.03.030
   Gong J., 2006, STATUS BEARS CHINA C
   Goursi UH, 2021, URSUS, V32, DOI 10.2192/URSUS-D-19-00031.3
   Guisan A., 2017, Habitat Suitability and Distribution Models: With Applications in R
   Hannah L, 2007, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V5, P131, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[131:PANIAC]2.0.CO;2
   Hannah L, 2002, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V11, P485, DOI 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00306.x
   Harsch MA, 2009, ECOL LETT, V12, P1040, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01355.x
   Johnson TF, 2023, NAT COMMUN, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-35665-9
   Keeley ATH, 2016, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V31, P2151, DOI 10.1007/s10980-016-0387-5
   Keppel G, 2015, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V13, P106, DOI 10.1890/140055
   Keppel G, 2012, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V21, P393, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00686.x
   Khosravi R, 2021, BIOL CONSERV, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109018
   Lavergne S, 2010, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V41, P321, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144628
   Lawler JJ, 2009, ECOLOGY, V90, P588, DOI 10.1890/08-0823.1
   Learmonth JA, 2006, OCEANOGR MAR BIOL, V44, P431
   Li J, 2021, ECOL EVOL, V11, P17202, DOI 10.1002/ece3.8358
   Li WW, 2019, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V19, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00664
   Li XC, 2016, SCI BULL, V61, P1651, DOI 10.1007/s11434-016-1148-1
   Liu F, 2011, BIOL CONSERV, V144, P538, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.009
   Liu F, 2009, DIVERS DISTRIB, V15, P649, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00571.x
   Ma Y., 1994, CHINESE BEARS
   Mackey Brendan G., 2008, Biodiversity (Ottawa), V9, P11
   Malcolm KD, 2014, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V2, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2014.09.010
   Mateo-Sánchez MC, 2015, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V30, P1405, DOI 10.1007/s10980-015-0194-4
   McGuire JL, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P7195, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1602817113
   McRae B. H., 2013, Circuitscape 4 User Guide
   Mcrae BH, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P19885, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0706568104
   Midgley GF, 2002, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V11, P445, DOI 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00307.x
   MILLS J, 1994, BEARS - THEIR BIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, P161
   NAGY JAS, 1990, INT C BEAR, V8, P227
   Nunez S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V154, P351, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02420-x
   Pacifici M, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P215, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2448
   Parmesan C, 2003, NATURE, V421, P37, DOI 10.1038/nature01286
   Parmesan C, 2006, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V37, P637, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
   Phillips SJ, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V190, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
   Phillips SJ, 2008, ECOGRAPHY, V31, P161, DOI 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x
   Pimm SL, 2014, SCIENCE, V344, P987, DOI 10.1126/science.1246752
   Post E, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aaw9883
   Preston BL, 2011, SUSTAIN SCI, V6, P177, DOI 10.1007/s11625-011-0129-1
   Rather TA, 2020, ECOL PROCESS, V9, DOI 10.1186/s13717-020-00265-2
   Sathyakumar S, 2001, URSUS-SERIES, V12, P21
   Sauve D, 2019, FUNCT ECOL, V33, P2180, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13406
   Searcy CA, 2016, AM NAT, V187, P423, DOI 10.1086/685387
   Stanton JC, 2012, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V3, P349, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00157.x
   Stuart-Smith RD, 2013, NATURE, V501, P539, DOI 10.1038/nature12529
   Summers DM, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P2335, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02700.x
   Sun L, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V326, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116753
   Sunday JM, 2011, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V278, P1823, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.1295
   Takahata C, 2013, URSUS, V24, P16, DOI 10.2192/URSUS-D-11-00018.1
   Tape KD, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P208, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13058
   Thackeray SJ, 2016, NATURE, V535, P241, DOI 10.1038/nature18608
   Thomas CD, 2004, NATURE, V427, P145, DOI 10.1038/nature02121
   Thuiller W, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P424, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01115.x
   Ullah Z, 2020, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V24, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01351
   Urban MC, 2015, SCIENCE, V348, P571, DOI 10.1126/science.aaa4984
   Urban MC, 2012, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V279, P2072, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2011.2367
   Walpole AA, 2012, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V27, P761, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9728-1
   Watson JEM, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P989, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2007, 10.1038/nclimate2007]
   Weyant JP, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V95, P317, DOI 10.1007/s10584-009-9612-4
   Ye XP, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V612, P775, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.191
   Yom-Tov Y, 2001, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V268, P947, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2001.1592
   Zahoor B, 2021, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V27, P4294, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15743
   Zahoor B, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P25179, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-12325-3
   Zhang J., 2011, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V20, P2897
NR 91
TC 3
Z9 5
U1 6
U2 24
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 2045-7758
J9 ECOL EVOL
JI Ecol. Evol.
PD JUN
PY 2023
VL 13
IS 6
AR e10222
DI 10.1002/ece3.10222
PG 17
WC Ecology; Evolutionary Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Evolutionary Biology
GA L0NM7
UT WOS:001020309700001
PM 37384242
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Manzanedo, RD
   Schanz, FR
   Fischer, M
   Allan, E
AF Manzanedo, R. D.
   Schanz, F. R.
   Fischer, M.
   Allan, E.
TI <i>Fagus sylvatica</i> seedlings show provenance differentiation rather
   than adaptation to soil in a transplant experiment
SO BMC ECOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Ectomycorrhizae; Plant-fungal interactions; Drought resistance; Genetic
   adaptation; Reciprocal transplant; Soil
ID PREDICTING SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI; LOCAL
   ADAPTATION; BIOTIC INTERACTIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE;
   PLANT-RESPONSE; GENE FLOW; DROUGHT; DIVERSITY
AB Background: Understanding and predicting the response of tree populations to climate change requires understanding the pattern and scale of their adaptation. Climate is often considered the major driver of local adaptation but, although biotic factors such as soil pathogens or mutualists could be as important, their role has typically been neglected. Biotic drivers might also interact with climate to affect performance and mycorrhizae, in particular, are likely to play a key role in determining drought resistance, which is important in the context of adaptation to future environmental change. To address these questions, we performed a fully reciprocal soil-plant transplant experiment using Fagus sylvatica seedlings and soils from three regions in Germany. To separate the biotic and abiotic effects of inoculation, half of the plants were inoculated with natural soil from the different origins, while the rest were grown on sterilized substrate. We also imposed a drought stress treatment to test for interactions between soil biota and climate. After 1 year of growth, we measured aboveground biomass of all seedlings, and quantified mycorrhizal colonization for a subset of the seedlings, which included all soil-plant combinations, to disentangle the effect of mycorrhiza from other agents.
   Results: We found that plant origin had the strongest effect on plant performance, but this interacted with soil origin. In general, trees showed a slight tendency to produce less aboveground biomass on local soils, suggesting soil antagonists could be causing trees to be maladapted to their local soils. Consistently, we found lower mycorrhizal colonization rate under local soil conditions. Across all soils, seedlings from low elevations produced more annual biomass than middle (+ 290%) and high (+ 97%) elevations. Interestingly, mycorrhizal colonization increased with drought in the two provenances that showed higher drought tolerance, which supports previous results showing that mycorrhizae can increase drought resistance.
   Conclusions: Our findings suggest that soil communities play a role in affecting early performance of temperate trees, although this role may be smaller than that of seed origin. Also, other effects, such as the positive response to generalists or negative interactions with soil biota may be as important as the highly specialized mycorrhizal associations.
C1 [Manzanedo, R. D.; Schanz, F. R.; Fischer, M.; Allan, E.] Univ Bern, Inst Plant Sci, Altenbergrain 21, CH-3013 Bern, Switzerland.
C3 University of Bern
RP Manzanedo, RD (corresponding author), Univ Bern, Inst Plant Sci, Altenbergrain 21, CH-3013 Bern, Switzerland.
EM rdmanzanedo@hotmail.com
RI Fischer, Markus/C-6411-2008; Allan, Eric/AAR-9566-2020
OI Allan, Eric/0000-0001-9641-9436; Schanz, Federica
   Romina/0000-0001-9020-1188; Delgado Manzanedo, Ruben/0000-0001-6592-7235
CR Allen CD, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P660, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001
   [Anonymous], CLIMATIC CHANGE
   [Anonymous], ACIAR MONOGRAPH
   [Anonymous], MYCORRHIZA
   Bardgett RD, 2013, J ECOL, V101, P334, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12043
   Barton K, 2018, PACKAGE MUMIN R PACK
   Baxter JW, 2001, NEW PHYTOL, V152, P139, DOI 10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00245.x
   Garzón MB, 2011, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V20, P766, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00646.x
   Crawley M.J., 2014, The R Book, V2nd
   Crémieux L, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V180, P524, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02545.x
   Csilléry K, 2014, MOL ECOL, V23, P4696, DOI 10.1111/mec.12902
   Davison J, 2015, SCIENCE, V349, P970, DOI 10.1126/science.aab1161
   Fischer M, 2010, BASIC APPL ECOL, V11, P473, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2010.07.009
   Gandon S, 2002, ECOL LETT, V5, P246, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00305.x
   Gehring CA, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P11169, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1704022114
   Gómez-Aparicio L, 2017, ECOLOGY, V98, P1908, DOI 10.1002/ecy.1864
   Gonzalo-Turpin H, 2009, J ECOL, V97, P742, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01509.x
   Grassein F, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P1452, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12445
   Guisan A, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P993, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x
   Gutschick VP, 2003, NEW PHYTOL, V160, P21, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00866.x
   Hereford J, 2009, AM NAT, V173, P579, DOI 10.1086/597611
   Hoeksema JD, 2010, ECOL LETT, V13, P394, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01430.x
   Johnson NC, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P2093, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0906710107
   Joshi J, 2001, ECOL LETT, V4, P536, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00262.x
   Kaltz O, 1998, HEREDITY, V81, P361, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00435.x
   Karst J, 2014, BOTANY, V92, P855, DOI 10.1139/cjb-2014-0063
   Kawecki TJ, 2004, ECOL LETT, V7, P1225, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00684.x
   Keane RM, 2002, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V17, P164, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02499-0
   Kennedy PG, 2007, PLANT SOIL, V291, P155, DOI 10.1007/s11104-006-9183-3
   Kernaghan G, 2005, PEDOBIOLOGIA, V49, P511, DOI 10.1016/j.pedobi.2005.05.007
   Kivlin SN, 2013, AM J BOT, V100, P1445, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1200558
   Kreyling J, 2014, ECOL EVOL, V4, P594, DOI 10.1002/ece3.971
   Kulmatiski A, 2008, ECOL LETT, V11, P980, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01209.x
   Lang C, 2011, MYCORRHIZA, V21, P297, DOI 10.1007/s00572-010-0338-y
   Lehto T, 2011, MYCORRHIZA, V21, P71, DOI 10.1007/s00572-010-0348-9
   Leimu R, 2008, PLOS ONE, V3, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0004010
   Liang EY, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P4380, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1520582113
   Lu N, 2016, FORESTS, V7, DOI 10.3390/f7120316
   Macel M, 2007, ECOLOGY, V88, P424, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[424:CVSFIL]2.0.CO;2
   Magri D, 2006, NEW PHYTOL, V171, P199, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01740.x
   McDowell NG, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P295, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2873, 10.1038/nclimate2873]
   Mohan JE, 2014, FUNGAL ECOL, V10, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.funeco.2014.01.005
   Peichl M, 2007, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V253, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.003
   Perner H, 2006, HORTSCIENCE, V41, P628, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.41.3.628
   Pickles BJ, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V207, P858, DOI 10.1111/nph.13360
   Pinheiro J., 2022, R package version 3.1-159, V3, P1
   Porth I., 2014, Diversity, V6, P283, DOI 10.3390/d6020283
   R Core Team, 2015, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
   Raabová J, 2011, BASIC APPL ECOL, V12, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2011.01.001
   Reynolds HL, 2003, ECOLOGY, V84, P2281, DOI 10.1890/02-0298
   Rillig MC, 2002, PLANT SOIL, V238, P325, DOI 10.1023/A:1014483303813
   Rincón A, 2001, MYCORRHIZA, V11, P265, DOI 10.1007/s005720100127
   Rúa MA, 2016, BMC EVOL BIOL, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12862-016-0698-9
   Shi LB, 2002, MYCORRHIZA, V12, P303, DOI 10.1007/s00572-002-0197-2
   Smith DS, 2012, PLANT SOIL, V352, P243, DOI 10.1007/s11104-011-0992-7
   Smith SE, 2008, MYCORRHIZAL SYMBIOSIS, 3RD EDITION, P1
   STEINER KC, 1990, AM MIDL NAT, V123, P292, DOI 10.2307/2426557
   Swaty RL, 2004, ECOLOGY, V85, P1072, DOI 10.1890/03-0224
   Vadeboncoeur MA, 2007, CAN J FOREST RES, V37, P1777, DOI 10.1139/X07-032
   Valladares F, 2014, ECOL LETT, V17, P1351, DOI 10.1111/ele.12348
   Van der Putten WH, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P2025, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0037
   Van Valen L, 1973, Evol Theory, V1, P1
   Vierheilig H, 2005, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V125, P393, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00564.x
   Wagner V, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0017580
   Wang KS, 2004, GENETICA, V122, P105, DOI 10.1023/B:GENE.0000040999.07339.d4
   Wisz MS, 2013, BIOL REV, V88, P15, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00235.x
NR 66
TC 11
Z9 14
U1 2
U2 50
PU BMC
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND
EI 1472-6785
J9 BMC ECOL
JI BMC Ecol.
PD OCT 3
PY 2018
VL 18
AR 42
DI 10.1186/s12898-018-0197-5
PG 12
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA GV9NA
UT WOS:000446484100002
PM 30285730
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Klanderud, K
   Meineri, E
   Töpper, J
   Michel, P
   Vandvik, V
AF Klanderud, Kari
   Meineri, Eric
   Topper, Joachim
   Michel, Pascale
   Vandvik, Vigdis
TI Biotic interaction effects on seedling recruitment along bioclimatic
   gradients: testing the stress-gradient hypothesis
SO JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Alpine plants; Boreal plants; Climate change; Experiments along
   environmental gradients; Generalist plants; Precipitation; Removal
   experiment; Seed-sowing experiment; Semi-natural grasslands; Temperature
ID ALPINE PLANT-COMMUNITIES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POSITIVE INTERACTIONS; SPECIES
   RICHNESS; DIVERSITY; FACILITATION; TEMPERATURE; INCREASE;
   DIFFERENTIATION; ESTABLISHMENT
AB QuestionsIs there a shift from positive to negative biotic interaction effects on seedling recruitment along two different stress gradients, temperature and precipitation (the stress-gradient hypothesis); do such interaction effects differ between species with different bioclimatic affinities?
   LocationBoreal, sub-alpine and alpine grassland in southern Norway.
   MethodsWe tested the stress-gradient hypothesis by comparing seedling recruitment in bare-ground gaps where vegetation has been removed vs in extant grassland vegetation in 12 boreal, sub-alpine and alpine grassland sites along a precipitation gradient. This was tested in (1) a seed-sowing experiment and (2) in naturally occurring recruitment of alpine, generalist and boreal species.
   ResultsEmergence of the sown alpine species was higher in the cold alpine than in the warmer sub-alpine sites, with no effects of precipitation or vegetation removal. The sown generalists also decreased in emergence towards warmer sites, whereas there was no effect of temperature on the sown boreal species. Vegetation removal, interacting with precipitation, increased the emergence of the generalist and boreal species sown at intermediate precipitation levels. In contrast, interactions between temperature and vegetation removal regulated the emergence of all groups of naturally occurring seedlings. Alpine and generalist species emerged at the highest rate in alpine sites, whereas boreal species had highest emergence in the lowlands.
   ConclusionFor all species groups, strong effects of vegetation removal show that competition from the extant vegetation dominates in controlling seedling emergence across all study sites and species. In generalist and boreal species, positive interactions between vegetation removal and temperature show that competitive interactions affect seedling emergence more strongly towards warmer climates, in line with the stress-gradient hypothesis. In contrast, alpine species show no such interactions. This suggests that species' adaptations to climate, in combination with environmental forcing, control seedling emergence along the bioclimatic gradients. Our results have implications for nature conservation, as we propose that disturbance from grazing animals can be useful to release competition and thereby increase seedling recruitment and biodiversity in boreal and alpine grasslands in a warmer future.
C1 [Klanderud, Kari] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Ecol & Nat Resource Management, POB 5003, NO-1432 As, Norway.
   [Meineri, Eric; Topper, Joachim; Michel, Pascale; Vandvik, Vigdis] Univ Bergen, Dept Biol, POB 7803, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway.
   [Topper, Joachim] Sogn & Fjordane Univ Coll, Fac Sci & Engn, Postboks 133, NO-6851 Sogndal, Norway.
C3 Norwegian University of Life Sciences; University of Bergen; Western
   Norway University of Applied Sciences
RP Klanderud, K (corresponding author), Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Ecol & Nat Resource Management, POB 5003, NO-1432 As, Norway.
EM kari.klanderud@nmbu.no; meineri.eric@gmail.com; joachim.topper@uib.no;
   pascale.michel6@gmail.com; vigdis.vandvik@bio.uib.no
RI Vandvik, Vigdis/C-1924-2008; Töpper, Joachim/AAG-6410-2020
OI Meineri, Eric/0000-0001-8825-8986; Topper, Joachim/0000-0002-6996-7223;
   , Kari/0000-0003-1049-7025
FU Norwegian Research Council (NORKLIMA) [184912/230]
FX We thank two anonymous reviewers and our handling editor for their
   valuable comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. We thank
   Astrid Berge and a large crew of IAESTE students for collecting some of
   the data and the landowners for granting us access to their grasslands.
   This study was partially funded by the Norwegian Research Council
   (NORKLIMA grant #184912/230).
CR AARSSEN LW, 1990, J VEG SCI, V1, P13, DOI 10.2307/3236049
   [Anonymous], 2009, Klima i Norge 2100. Bakgrunnsmateriale til NOU Klimatilplassing
   BERTNESS MD, 1994, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V9, P191, DOI 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90088-4
   Blois JL, 2013, SCIENCE, V341, P499, DOI 10.1126/science.1237184
   Brooker RW, 2006, NEW PHYTOL, V171, P271, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01752.x
   Callaway RM, 2002, NATURE, V417, P844, DOI 10.1038/nature00812
   Cavieres L, 2002, J VEG SCI, V13, P547, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02081.x
   Cavieres LA, 2008, FUNCT ECOL, V22, P148, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01338.x
   Cavieres LA, 2006, NEW PHYTOL, V169, P59, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01573.x
   Cavieres LA, 2009, J ECOL, V97, P1181, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01579.x
   Choler P, 2001, ECOLOGY, V82, P3295, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[3295:FACOGI]2.0.CO;2
   Díaz S, 2003, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V18, P140, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00007-7
   Eriksson A, 1997, NORD J BOT, V17, P469, DOI 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1997.tb00344.x
   Eriksson O, 1996, CAN J BOT, V74, P1369, DOI 10.1139/b96-166
   Farinas AS, 2011, THESIS
   Fournier DA, 2012, OPTIM METHOD SOFTW, V27, P233, DOI 10.1080/10556788.2011.597854
   Gottfried M, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P111, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1329, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1329]
   Graae BJ, 2011, OECOLOGIA, V166, P565, DOI 10.1007/s00442-010-1878-8
   He Q, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P695, DOI 10.1111/ele.12080
   Ibáñez I, 2007, ECOL MONOGR, V77, P163, DOI 10.1890/06-1097
   Jensen K, 2003, BASIC APPL ECOL, V4, P579, DOI 10.1078/1439-1791-00179
   Klanderud K, 2005, ECOLOGY, V86, P2047, DOI 10.1890/04-1563
   Klanderud K, 2003, HOLOCENE, V13, P1, DOI 10.1191/0959683603hl589ft
   Klanderud K, 2007, OIKOS, V116, P1279, DOI 10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.15906.x
   Klanderud K, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0130205
   Klanderud K, 2010, J ECOL, V98, P1128, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01703.x
   Laskurain NA, 2013, J VEG SCI, V24, P320, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01469.x
   Leck M.A., 2008, SEEDLING ECOLOGY EVO, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511815133
   Lenoir J, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P1768, DOI 10.1126/science.1156831
   Lid J., 2007, Norsk flora
   Ma MJ, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0080220
   Maalouf JP, 2012, ANN BOT-LONDON, V110, P821, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcs152
   McCarty JP, 2001, CONSERV BIOL, V15, P320, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015002320.x
   Meineri E, 2014, J VEG SCI, V25, P275, DOI 10.1111/jvs.12062
   Meineri E, 2013, PLANT ECOL, V214, P607, DOI 10.1007/s11258-013-0193-y
   Meineri E, 2012, ECOL MODEL, V231, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.01.021
   Michalet R, 2006, ECOL LETT, V9, P767, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00935.x
   Milbau A, 2013, NEW PHYTOL, V197, P1002, DOI 10.1111/nph.12054
   Milberg P, 2000, SEED SCI RES, V10, P99, DOI 10.1017/S0960258500000118
   Mod HK, 2014, J VEG SCI, V25, P1024, DOI 10.1111/jvs.12148
   Molau U, 1997, GLOB CHANGE BIOL, V3, P80, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.1997.gcb130.x
   Moles AT, 2003, J BIOGEOGR, V30, P105, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00781.x
   Olsen SL, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P1915, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13241
   Olsen SL, 2014, OIKOS, V123, P71, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00336.x
   Pauli H, 2012, SCIENCE, V336, P353, DOI 10.1126/science.1219033
   Pluess AR, 2005, OECOLOGIA, V144, P55, DOI 10.1007/s00442-005-0047-y
   Pywell RF, 2011, BIOL CONSERV, V144, P1602, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.02.010
   Sandvik SM, 2009, PLANT ECOL, V205, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11258-009-9594-3
   Scherrer D, 2011, J BIOGEOGR, V38, P406, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02407.x
   Speed JDM, 2012, J VEG SCI, V23, P617, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01391.x
   Stocker, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013
   Tingstad L, 2015, OECOLOGIA, V179, P599, DOI 10.1007/s00442-015-3360-0
   Totland O, 2002, OECOLOGIA, V133, P168, DOI 10.1007/s00442-002-1028-z
   Totland O, 1999, OECOLOGIA, V120, P242, DOI 10.1007/s004420050854
   Walck JL, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2145, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02368.x
   Walther GR, 2002, NATURE, V416, P389, DOI 10.1038/416389a
   Wang YS, 2008, ACTA OECOL, V33, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.actao.2007.10.002
   WOOKEY PA, 1995, OECOLOGIA, V102, P478, DOI 10.1007/BF00341360
   Zimmermann J, 2008, J ECOL, V96, P1033, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01409.x
   Zuur Alain F., 2009, P1
NR 60
TC 29
Z9 31
U1 1
U2 49
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1100-9233
EI 1654-1103
J9 J VEG SCI
JI J. Veg. Sci.
PD MAR
PY 2017
VL 28
IS 2
BP 347
EP 356
DI 10.1111/jvs.12495
PG 10
WC Plant Sciences; Ecology; Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry
GA EP7LK
UT WOS:000397559100012
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Asaaga, FA
   Tomude, ES
   Rickards, NJ
   Hassall, R
   Sarkar, S
   Purse, BV
AF Asaaga, Festus A.
   Tomude, Emmanuel S.
   Rickards, Nathan J.
   Hassall, Richard
   Sarkar, Sunita
   Purse, Bethan V.
TI Informing climate-health adaptation options through mapping the needs
   and potential for integrated climate-driven early warning forecasting
   systems in South Asia-A scoping review
SO PLOS ONE
LA English
DT Article
ID VECTOR-BORNE DISEASE; WEST NILE VIRUS; JAPANESE ENCEPHALITIS; LYMPHATIC
   FILARIASIS; CHOLERA; SURVEILLANCE; CHALLENGES; DISTRICT; SCIENCE; AREA
AB Background Climate change is widely recognised to threaten human health, wellbeing and livelihoods, including through its effects on the emergence, spread and burdens of climate-and water-sensitive infectious diseases. However, the scale and mechanisms of the impacts are uncertain and it is unclear whether existing forecasting capacities will foster successful local-level adaptation planning, particularly in climate vulnerable regions in developing countries. The purpose of this scoping review was to characterise and map priority climate- and water-sensitive diseases, map existing forecasting and surveillance systems in climate and health sectors and scope out the needs and potential to develop integrated climate-driven early warning forecasting systems for long-term adaptation planning and interventions in the south Asia region.Methods We searched Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus and PubMed using title, abstract and keywords only for papers focussing on climate-and water-sensitive diseases and explicit mention of either forecasting or surveillance systems in south Asia. We conducted further internet search of relevant national climate adaptation plans and health policies affecting disease management. We identified 187 studies reporting on climate-sensitive diseases and information systems in the south Asia context published between 1992 and 2024.Results We found very few robust, evidenced-based forecasting systems for climate- and water- sensitive infectious diseases, which suggests limited operationalisation of decision-support tools that could inform actions to reduce disease burdens in the region. Many of the information systems platforms identified focussed on climate-sensitive vector-borne disease systems, with limited tools for water-sensitive diseases. This reveals an opportunity to develop tools for these neglected disease groups. Of the 34 operational platforms identified across the focal countries, only 13 (representing 38.2%) are freely available online and all were developed and implemented by the human health sector. Tools are needed for other south Asian countries (Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bhutan) where the risks of infectious diseases are predicted to increase substantially due to climate change, drought and shifts in human demography and use of ecosystems.Conclusion Altogether, the findings highlight clear opportunities to invest in the co-development and implementation of contextually relevant climate-driven early warning tools and research priorities for disease control and adaptation planning.
C1 [Asaaga, Festus A.; Tomude, Emmanuel S.; Rickards, Nathan J.; Hassall, Richard; Sarkar, Sunita; Purse, Bethan V.] UK Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford, England.
C3 UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH)
RP Asaaga, FA; Tomude, ES (corresponding author), UK Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford, England.
EM fesasa@ceh.ac.uk; emmanuel.stomude@gmail.com
OI Asaaga, Festus/0000-0003-2675-9464
FU NERC as part of National Capability
FX The research was funded by NERC as part of National Capability. The
   funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis,
   decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
CR Adimi F, 2010, MALARIA J, V9, DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-9-125
   Ahmed T, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17228518
   Ali M, 2013, J HEALTH POPUL NUTR, V31, P11
   Alonso J, 2013, HEALTH QUAL LIFE OUT, V11, DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-11-210
   Anoopkumar AN, 2022, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V24, P8900, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01792-4
   Anwar A, 2019, IRAN J PUBLIC HEALTH, V48, P2187
   Asaaga FA, 2021, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V21, DOI 10.1186/s12889-021-11545-7
   Asaaga Festus A, 2022, PLOS Glob Public Health, V2, pe0000075, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000075
   Balakrishnan A, 2017, INDIAN J MED RES, V146, P70, DOI [10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1638_15, 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_1638_15]
   Bett BK., Climate Services, V28, P100326
   Bhandari D, 2020, ACTA TROP, V204, DOI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105337
   Borah J, 2013, ECOHEALTH, V10, P129, DOI 10.1007/s10393-013-0849-z
   Bostan N, 2017, REV MED VIROL, V27, DOI 10.1002/rmv.1899
   Braun V, 2021, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V18, P328, DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Burthe SJ, 2021, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009243
   Ceglar A, 2021, NPJ CLIM ATMOS SCI, V4, DOI 10.1038/s41612-021-00198-3
   Chua PLC, 2021, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V5, pE436, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00152-2
   Cruz RV, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P469
   Daisy SS, 2020, J WATER HEALTH, V18, P207, DOI 10.2166/wh.2020.133
   Das N, 2022, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V194, DOI 10.1007/s10661-022-10274-7
   Deebani W, 2023, COMPUT METHOD BIOMEC, V26, P1294, DOI 10.1080/10255842.2022.2114793
   Devi RR, 2018, J VECTOR DIS, V55, P20, DOI 10.4103/0972-9062.234622
   Dhimal M, 2021, FRONT PHYSIOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fphys.2021.651189
   Dione C, 2022, CLIM SERV, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2022.100326
   Dutta S, 2021, MAUSAM, V72, P399
   Ehelepola NDB, 2015, INFECT DIS POVERTY, V4, DOI 10.1186/s40249-015-0075-8
   Essar MY, 2023, HEALTH SCI REP-US, V6, DOI 10.1002/hsr2.1775
   Garza M, 2019, PREV VET MED, V167, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.03.004
   Hartemink N, 2015, BIOL REV, V90, P1151, DOI 10.1111/brv.12149
   Hess J, 2020, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V371, DOI 10.1136/bmj.m3081
   Hirons L, 2021, CLIM SERV, V23, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100246
   Islam S, 2021, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/atmos12070905
   Jawid A, 2019, ECON ANAL POLICY, V64, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.eap.2019.07.010
   Kakarla SG, 2019, EPIDEMIOL INFECT, V147, DOI 10.1017/S0950268819000608
   Karunasena VM, 2019, MALARIA J, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12936-019-2843-6
   Khan AI, 2020, CLIN INFECT DIS, V71, P1635, DOI 10.1093/cid/ciz1075
   Kirkby P, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P577, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1372265
   Leach M, 2013, SOC SCI MED, V88, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.017
   Leao I., 2018, Jobs from agriculture in Afghanistan
   Lee S, 2022, CLIM RISK MANAG, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2022.100414
   Liu F., 2021, Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases in BRI Countries, P15
   Lowe R, 2011, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V37, P371, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2010.01.008
   Malavige GN, 2021, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009624
   McIntyre KM, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-06948-9
   McNamara KE, 2017, LOCAL ENVIRON, V22, P443, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2016.1216954
   Mishra MM, 2022, INDIAN J PUBLIC HLTH, V66, P20, DOI 10.4103/ijph.ijph_1298_21
   Misslin R, 2016, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1382, P56, DOI 10.1111/nyas.13084
   Mora C, 2022, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V12, P869, DOI 10.1038/s41558-022-01426-1
   Nagavarapu S, 2022, LYMPHAT RES BIOL, V20, P319, DOI 10.1089/lrb.2020.0014
   Naseem Z., Viral infections in Pakistan: prevalence, factors affecting spread, and recommendations for control
   National Environmental Protection Agency-Afghanistan, 2017, 2 NAT COMM UN FRAM C
   Nilgiriwala KS, 2018, INDIAN J PUBLIC HLTH, V62, P193, DOI 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_306_17
   Olson SH, 2015, EMERG INFECT DIS, V21, P1285, DOI 10.3201/eid2108.141156
   Page MJ, 2021, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V372, DOI [10.1136/bmj.n71, 10.1136/bmj.n160, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906]
   Patil S, 2021, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.798034
   Pilot E, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9040604
   Pley C, 2021, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V5, pE739, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00141-8
   Pramanik M, 2020, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-09609-1
   Prtner H.O., Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, P3056
   Purse BV, 2020, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008179
   Purse BV, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0183583
   Purse BV, 2015, BIOL J LINN SOC, V115, P664, DOI 10.1111/bij.12567
   Rahman Z, 2018, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V6, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00238
   Roy M, 2015, MALARIA J, V14, DOI 10.1186/s12936-015-0937-3
   Ryan SJ, 2020, MALARIA J, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12936-020-03224-6
   Saha GK, 2021, J INFECT DIS, V224, pS710, DOI 10.1093/infdis/jiab436
   Sarkar S, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16183474
   Sarker AR, 2023, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V17, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011820
   Scoones I, 2017, PHILOS T R SOC B, V372, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2016.0164
   Shammin M.R., 2022, Climate Change and Community Resilience, P11, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-981
   Shrestha SL, 2017, ENVIRON MODEL ASSESS, V22, P459, DOI 10.1007/s10666-017-9547-5
   Shrestha UB, 2022, ECOL EVOL, V12, DOI 10.1002/ece3.9204
   Stewart-Ibarra AM., Wellcome Trust, V24, P2022
   Sudeep AB, 2015, J VECTOR DIS, V52, P185
   Tricco AC, 2016, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4
   Tsheten T, 2021, T ROY SOC TROP MED H, V115, P583, DOI 10.1093/trstmh/traa158
   Upadhyayula SM, 2012, VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOT, V12, P418, DOI 10.1089/vbz.2011.0713
   Wangdi K, 2014, MALARIA J, V13, DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-352
   Warnasekara J, 2022, PLOS ONE, V17, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0275447
   Whateley S, 2015, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000466
   Wijerathna T, 2023, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V67, P275, DOI 10.1007/s00484-022-02404-0
   Yadav SK, 2021, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.645405
   Yang XR, 2021, J TRAVEL MED, V28, DOI 10.1093/jtm/taab146
   Yang Y, SHS WEB C 2023, V152, P05001
NR 84
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 2
PU PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
PI SAN FRANCISCO
PA 1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA
SN 1932-6203
J9 PLOS ONE
JI PLoS One
PD OCT 24
PY 2024
VL 19
IS 10
AR e0309757
DI 10.1371/journal.pone.0309757
PG 24
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA K7J6Z
UT WOS:001345605200116
PM 39446805
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Fernandes, R
   Hong, G
   Brown, LA
   Dash, J
   Harvey, K
   Kalimipalli, S
   Macdougall, C
   Meier, C
   Morris, H
   Shah, H
   Sharma, A
   Sun, LX
AF Fernandes, Richard
   Hong, Gang
   Brown, Luke A.
   Dash, Jadu
   Harvey, Kate
   Kalimipalli, Simha
   Macdougall, Camryn
   Meier, Courtney
   Morris, Harry
   Shah, Hemit
   Sharma, Abhay
   Sun, Lixin
TI Not just a pretty picture: Mapping Leaf Area Index at 10 m resolution
   using Sentinel-2
SO REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Sentinel-2; Leaf area index; Downscaling; Validation
ID SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; LAI PRODUCTS; VALIDATION; REFLECTANCE; VARIABLES;
   IMAGERY; TREES
AB Achieving the Global Climate Observing System goal of 10 m resolution leaf area index (LAI) maps is critical for applications related to climate adaptation, sustainable agriculture, and ecosystem monitoring. Five strategies for producing 10 m LAI maps from Sentinel-2 (S2) imagery are evaluated: i. bi-cubic interpolation of 20 m resolution S2 LAI maps from the Simplified Level 2 Prototype Processor Version 1 (SL2PV1) as currently performed by the Sentinel Applications Platform (SNAP), ii. applying SL2PV1 to S2 reflectance bands spatially downscaled to 10 m using bi-cubic interpolation (BICUBIC), iii. Applying SL2PV1 to S2 reflectance bands spatially downscaled to 10 m using Area to Point Regression Kriging (ATPRK), iv. using a recalibrated version of SL2PV1 (SL2PV2) requiring only three S2 10m bands, and iv) a novel use of the previously developed Active Learning Regularization (ALR) approach to locally approximate the SL2PV1 algorithm using only 10 m bands. Algorithms were assessed in terms of per-pixel accuracy and spatial metrics when comparing 10 m LAI maps produced using either actual S2 imagery or S2 imagery synthesized from airborne hyperspectral imagery to reference 10 m LAI maps traceable to in-situ fiducial reference measurements at 10 sites across the continental US. ATPRK and ALR algorithms had the lowest precision error of -0.15 LAI, compared to 0.19 LAI for SNAP and BICUBIC and 0.35 LAI for SL2PV2, and ranked highest in terms of local correlation and Structural Similarity Index measure as well as qualitative agreement with reference maps. SL2PV2 LAI showed evidence of saturation over forests related to decreased sensitivity of input visible reflectance. All algorithms had a similar uncertainty of -0.55 LAI compared to traceable reference maps, due to the trade-off between bias and precision. However, ATPRK and ALR uncertainty reduced to 0.11 LAI and 0.16 LAI, respectively, when compared to reference maps that ignored canopy clumping. These results suggest that both ATPRK and ALR are suitable for producing 10 m S2 LAI maps assuming bias due to local clumping can be corrected in the underlying SL2PV1 algorithm.
C1 [Fernandes, Richard; Hong, Gang; Harvey, Kate; Kalimipalli, Simha; Macdougall, Camryn; Shah, Hemit; Sharma, Abhay; Sun, Lixin] Nat Resources Canada, Canada Ctr Remote Sensing, 580 Booth St, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E4, Canada.
   [Brown, Luke A.] Univ Salford, Sch Sci Engn & Environm, Manchester M5 4WT, England.
   [Dash, Jadu] Univ Southampton, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, England.
   [Meier, Courtney] Battelle Mem Inst, Natl Ecol Observ Network, Boulder, CO 80301 USA.
   [Morris, Harry] Natl Phys Lab, Climate & Earth Observat Grp, Teddington TW11 0LW, England.
C3 Natural Resources Canada; Strategic Policy & Results Sector - Natural
   Resources Canada; Canada Centre for Mapping & Earth Observation (CCMEO);
   University of Salford; University of Southampton; National Physical
   Laboratory - UK
RP Fernandes, R (corresponding author), Nat Resources Canada, Canada Ctr Remote Sensing, 580 Booth St, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E4, Canada.
EM Richard.Fernandes@canada.ca
RI Hong, Gang/GWM-6458-2022; Brown, Luke/AAI-2606-2019
OI Harvey, Kate/0009-0005-2242-5143; Brown, Luke/0000-0003-4807-9056
FU European Commission Joint Research Centre, Global Component of the
   European Union's Copernicus Land Monitoring Service [FWC932059];
   University College London; University of Leicester; University of
   Southampton; University of Valencia; Informus GmbH; European Space
   Agency; Natural Resources Canada's Earth Observation for Cumulative
   Effects Project
FX <STRONG> </STRONG>SL2PV1 and SL2PV2 neural networks were produced using
   code adapted from original code provided by Dr. Marie Weiss and Dr. Fred
   Baret. We acknowledge the use of modified Sentinel-2 data and derived
   products. This study has been undertaken using data from GBOV "Ground
   Based Observation for Validation" (https://land.copernicus.
   eu/global/gbov) funded by European Commission Joint Research Centre
   FWC932059, part of the Global Component of the European Union's
   Copernicus Land Monitoring Service. GBOV products are developed and
   managed by ACRI-ST with the support from University College London,
   University of Leicester, University of Southampton, University of
   Valencia and Informus GmbH. We thank the National Ecological Observatory
   Network for the measurements collected in the field and used to generate
   GBOV products. We thank Dr. Marie Weiss and Dr. Fred Baret for providing
   the code used to calibrate SL2PV1 and SL2PV2. We thank four excellent
   reviewers and the editors of this paper. The contribution of L.A. Brown
   was carried out under the Living Planet Fellowship, a programme of and
   funded by the European Space Agency. The view expressed in this
   publication can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of
   the European Space Agency. The work was funded by Natural Resources
   Canada's Earth Observation for Cumulative Effects Project.
CR Armannsson SE, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13112192
   Awaya Y, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15123043
   Barnett DT, 2019, ECOSPHERE, V10, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2540
   Béland M, 2011, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V151, P1252, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.05.004
   Brodu N, 2017, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V55, P4610, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2694881
   Brown LA, 2024, ECOL INFORM, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102441
   Brown LA, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13163194
   Brown LA, 2021, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V175, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.02.020
   Brown LA, 2020, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V247, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111935
   Brown LA, 2023, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V14, P2329, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.14199
   Butson CR, 2004, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V89, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2003.10.017
   Chen JM, 1997, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V102, P29429, DOI 10.1029/97JD01107
   Clerc S., 2021, S2 MPC L1C Data Quality Report
   Colombo R, 2003, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V86, P120, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00094-4
   Danson FM, 2018, INTERFACE FOCUS, V8, DOI 10.1098/rsfs.2017.0049
   Defourny P, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V221, P551, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.007
   Djamai N, 2021, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112241
   Djamai N, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V225, P416, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.03.020
   Djamai N, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10060926
   Dong YD, 2023, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V61, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3235949
   Doxani G, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10020352
   Dube N, 2019, AGRON J, V111, P2999, DOI 10.2134/agronj2019.01.0018
   ESA, 2023, Sentinel-2A Point Spread Function
   ESA, 2023, COPE-GSEG-EOPGTN-15-0007
   Estévez J, 2022, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V273, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2022.112958
   Fang HL, 2019, REV GEOPHYS, V57, P739, DOI 10.1029/2018RG000608
   Fang HL, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V118, P529, DOI 10.1002/jgrg.20051
   Fernandes R, 2005, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V95, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2005.01.005
   Fernandes R, 2003, CAN J REMOTE SENS, V29, P241, DOI 10.5589/m02-092
   Fernandes R., 2014, GlobalLeafArea Index Product Validation GoodPractices' Committee on Earth Observation Satellites, Working Group on Calibration and Validation, P1, DOI [DOI 10.5067/DOC/CEOSWGCV/LPV/LAI.002, 10.5067/doc/ceoswgcv/lpv/lai.002]
   Fernandes R., 2024, Earth Syst. Sci. Data
   Fernandes R, 2024, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V305, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2024.114060
   Fernandes R, 2023, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V293, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113600
   Fernandes Richard Anthony, 2020, Zenodo, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.4321298
   Ganguly S, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V122, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.032
   Garrigues S, 2006, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V105, P286, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.013
   Gascon F, 2017, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/rs9060584
   Gebbers R, 2011, AGRON J, V103, P1532, DOI 10.2134/agronj2011.0201
   Hosoi F, 2006, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V44, P3610, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2006.881743
   Houborg R, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10060890
   Jin Z, 2007, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V85, P628, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.08.016
   Kamoske AG, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V433, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.11.017
   Kampe T., 2015, NEON.DOC.001290
   Kang YH, 2021, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V258, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112383
   Kganyago M, 2020, REMOTE SENS LETT, V11, P883, DOI 10.1080/2150704X.2020.1767823
   Kimm H, 2020, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V239, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111615
   Kross A, 2015, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V34, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2014.08.002
   Lanaras C, 2018, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V146, P305, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.09.018
   LANG ARG, 1986, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V37, P229, DOI 10.1016/0168-1923(86)90033-X
   Law BE, 2001, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V108, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00226-X
   Lefsky MA, 2002, BIOSCIENCE, V52, P19, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0019:LRSFES]2.0.CO;2
   Lupardus RC, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105515
   Mathworks, 2023, Piecewise Cubic Hermite Interpolating Polynomial (PCHIP)
   McCabe MF, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P10017, DOI 10.1002/2017WR022240
   dos Santos LM, 2020, IEEE J-STARS, V13, P6401, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3034193
   Mulla DJ, 2013, BIOSYST ENG, V114, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.08.009
   Muller-Wilm U., 2018, SEN2COR CONFIGURATIO, V2nd
   NEON (National Ecological Observatory Network), 2023, Spectrometer orthorectified surface directional reflectance - flightline (DP1.30006.001), RELEASE-2023a, DOI [10.48443/ypjz-et36, DOI 10.48443/YPJZ-ET36]
   NEON (National Ecological Observatory Network), 2023, Spectrometer orthorectified at-sensor radiance - flightline (DP1.30008.001), RELEASE-2023b, DOI [10.48443/ehnm-xd88, DOI 10.48443/EHNM-XD88]
   NEON (National Ecological Observatory Network), 2022, Digital hemispheric photos of plot vegetation (DP1.10017.001), DOI [10.48443/t8a4-vk69, DOI 10.48443/T8A4-VK69, DOI 10.48443/X12V-N568]
   Park NW, 2019, KOREAN J REMOTE SENS, V35, P589, DOI 10.7780/kjrs.2019.35.4.8
   Rouault Even, 2024, Zenodo
   Schouwenaars R, 2012, MATER SCI FORUM, V715-716, P522, DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.715-716.522
   Soudani K, 2006, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V102, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.004
   Sumnall MJ, 2021, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112250
   Tran TDB, 2011, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V3, P2128, DOI 10.3390/rs3102128
   Tian YH, 2003, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V84, P143, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00102-5
   van der Walt S, 2014, PEERJ, V2, DOI 10.7717/peerj.453
   Verger A, 2011, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V115, P415, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2010.09.012
   VERHOEF W, 1984, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V16, P125, DOI 10.1016/0034-4257(84)90057-9
   Wang QM, 2016, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V187, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2016.10.030
   Wang QM, 2016, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V114, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.02.006
   Wang Z, 2004, IEEE T IMAGE PROCESS, V13, P600, DOI 10.1109/TIP.2003.819861
   Weiss M, 2004, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V121, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.08.001
   Weiss M., 2020, S2ToolBox Level 2 products LAI, FAPAR, FCOVER
   Weiss M., 2019, S2ToolBox Level 2 Products: LAI, FAPAR, FCOVER
   WMO, 2022, GCOS- No. 245, P261
   Xu BD, 2020, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V240, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111700
   Xu F, 2021, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V171, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.11.009
   Yamazaki D, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P5844, DOI 10.1002/2017GL072874
   Yang C, 2009, PRECIS AGRIC, V10, P292, DOI 10.1007/s11119-009-9120-6
   Zheng HR, 2017, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/rs9121274
NR 82
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 16
U2 16
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
PI NEW YORK
PA STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA
SN 0034-4257
EI 1879-0704
J9 REMOTE SENS ENVIRON
JI Remote Sens. Environ.
PD SEP 1
PY 2024
VL 311
AR 114269
DI 10.1016/j.rse.2024.114269
EA JUN 2024
PG 29
WC Environmental Sciences; Remote Sensing; Imaging Science & Photographic
   Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Remote Sensing; Imaging Science &
   Photographic Technology
GA XM4F2
UT WOS:001262079600001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Ugolotti, A
   Anders, T
   Lanssens, B
   Hickler, T
   François, L
   Tölle, MH
AF Ugolotti, Alessandro
   Anders, Tim
   Lanssens, Benjamin
   Hickler, Thomas
   Francois, Louis
   Toelle, Merja H.
TI Impact of bias correction on climate change signals over central Europe
   and the Iberian Peninsula
SO FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE climate changes; extremes; convection-permitting scale; COSMO-CLM;
   LPJ-GUESS; CARAIB; bias correction; RCP8.5
ID NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION; REGIONAL CLIMATE; CHANGE PROJECTIONS;
   MODEL; PRECIPITATION; INDEXES; SCALE; ENSEMBLE; EXTREMES; SCHEME
AB Vegetation models for climate adaptation and mitigation strategies require spatially high-resolution climate input data in which the error with respect to observations has been previously corrected. To quantify the impact of bias correction, we examine the effects of quantile-mapping bias correction on the climate change signal (CCS) of climate, extremes, and biological variables from the convective regional climate model COSMO-CLM and two dynamic vegetation models (LPJ-GUESS and CARAIB). COSMO-CLM was driven and analyzed at 3 km horizontal resolution over Central Europe (CE) and the Iberian Peninsula (IP) for the transient period 1980-2070 under the RCP8.5 scenario. Bias-corrected and uncorrected climate simulations served as input to run the dynamic vegetation models over Wallonia. Main result of the impact of bias correction on the climate is a reduction of seasonal absolute precipitation by up to -55% with respect to uncorrected simulations. Yet, seasonal climate changes of precipitation and also temperature are marginally affected by bias correction. Main result of the impact of bias correction on changes in extremes is a robust spatial mean CCS of climate extreme indices over both domains. Yet, local biases can both over- and underestimate changes in these indices and be as large as the raw CCS. Changes in extremely wet days are locally enhanced by bias correction by more than 100%. Droughts in southern IP are exacerbated by bias correction, which increases changes in consecutive dry days by up to 14 days/year. Changes in growing season length in CE are affected by quantile mapping due to local biases ranging from 24 days/year in western CE to -24 days/year in eastern CE. The increase of tropical nights and summer days in both domains is largely affected by bias correction at the grid scale because of local biases ranging within +/- 14 days/year. Bias correction of this study strongly reduces the precipitation amount which has a strong impact on the results of the vegetation models with a reduced vegetation biomass and increases in net primary productivity. Nevertheless, there are large differences in the results of the two applied vegetation models.
C1 [Ugolotti, Alessandro; Toelle, Merja H.] Univ Kassel, Kassel Inst Sustainabil, Kassel, Germany.
   [Anders, Tim; Hickler, Thomas] Senckenberg Biodivers & Climate Res Ctr, SBiK F, Frankfurt, Germany.
   [Lanssens, Benjamin; Francois, Louis] Univ Liege, Unit Modelling Climate & Biogeochem Cycles, Res Unit Spheres, Liege, Belgium.
   [Hickler, Thomas] Goethe Univ, Dept Phys Geog, Frankfurt, Germany.
C3 Universitat Kassel; Leibniz Association; Senckenberg Gesellschaft fur
   Naturforschung (SGN); Senckenberg Biodiversitat & Klima-
   Forschungszentrum (BiK-F); University of Liege; Goethe University
   Frankfurt
RP Tölle, MH (corresponding author), Univ Kassel, Kassel Inst Sustainabil, Kassel, Germany.
RI Hickler, Thomas/S-6287-2016; François, Louis/K-9172-2019
OI Francois, Louis/0000-0001-8292-8360
FU FFG (Austria); F.R.S.-FNRS; BELSPO (Belgium); DLR/BMBF (Germany); NWO
   (Netherlands); AEI (Spain); European Union [776608]; German Research
   Foundation (DFG) [401857120]; Scientific Steering Committee (WLA)
   [bb118]
FX This work has been conducted within the MAPPY project (Multisectoral
   analysis of climate and land use change impacts on pollinators, plant
   diversity and crop yields) which is part of AXIS, an ERA-NET initiated
   by JPI Climate, and funded by FFG (Austria), F.R.S.-FNRS and BELSPO
   (Belgium), DLR/BMBF (Germany), NWO (Netherlands), and AEI (Spain) with
   co-funding by the European Union (Grant number 776608). This research
   was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) grant number
   401857120. This work used resources of the Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum
   (DKRZ) granted by its Scientific Steering Committee (WLA) under project
   ID bb118. ERA5 data reformatted by the CLM community provided via the
   DKRZ data pool were used.
CR Alexander LV, 2006, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V111, DOI 10.1029/2005JD006290
   [Anonymous], 2000, STAT ANAL CLIMATE RE, DOI DOI 10.2307/2669798
   [Anonymous], 1977, General Circulation Models of the Atmosphere, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-460817-7.50009-4
   Baldauf M, 2011, MON WEATHER REV, V139, P3887, DOI 10.1175/MWR-D-10-05013.1
   Ban N, 2021, CLIM DYNAM, V57, P275, DOI 10.1007/s00382-021-05708-w
   Beck HE, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2018.214
   Breugem AJ, 2020, EARTH-SCI REV, V204, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103171
   Buser CM, 2009, CLIM DYNAM, V33, P849, DOI 10.1007/s00382-009-0588-6
   Casanueva A, 2020, ATMOS SCI LETT, V21, DOI 10.1002/asl.978
   Champeaux JL, 2005, METEOROL APPL, V12, P29, DOI 10.1017/S1350482705001519
   Chen C, 2011, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V38, DOI 10.1029/2011GL049318
   Christensen JH, 2008, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V35, DOI 10.1029/2008GL035694
   Christensen JH., 2007, Evaluating the performance and utility of regional climate models: the PRUDENCE project
   Christensen O.B., 2007, HIRHAM REGIONAL CLIM, V5, P1
   Coppola E, 2020, CLIM DYNAM, V55, P3, DOI 10.1007/s00382-018-4521-8
   Déqué M, 2012, CLIM DYNAM, V38, P951, DOI 10.1007/s00382-011-1053-x
   Dirmeyer PA, 2006, B AM METEOROL SOC, V87, P1381, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-87-10-1381
   Doms G., 2002, DESCRIPTION NONHYDRO, DOI [10.5676/DWD_pub/nwv/cosmo-doc_6.00_I, DOI 10.5676/DWD_PUB/NWV/COSMO-DOC_6.00_I]
   Doms G., 2021, DESCRIPTION NONHYDRO, DOI [10.5676/DWD/pub/nwv/cosmo-doc_6.00_II, DOI 10.5676/DWD/PUB/NWV/COSMO-DOC_6.00_II]
   Dosio A, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V121, P5488, DOI 10.1002/2015JD024411
   Dury M, 2011, IFOREST, V4, P82, DOI 10.3832/ifor0572-004
   Dury M, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9110722
   Ehret U, 2012, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V16, P3391, DOI 10.5194/hess-16-3391-2012
   Fernández-González S, 2012, INT J CLIMATOL, V32, P2181, DOI 10.1002/joc.2431
   Fischer G., 2008, Global agroecological zones assessment for agriculture (GAEZ 2008), V10
   Frich P, 2002, CLIMATE RES, V19, P193, DOI 10.3354/cr019193
   Giorgetta Marco, 2012, WDCC, V1, DOI 10.1594/WDCC/CMIP5.MXELHI
   Giorgetta Marco, 2012, WDCC, V1, DOI 10.1594/WDCC/CMIP5.MXELR8
   Giorgetta MA, 2013, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V5, P572, DOI 10.1002/jame.20038
   Giorgi F, 2008, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V63, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.09.005
   Giorgi F, 2019, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V124, P5696, DOI 10.1029/2018JD030094
   Haerter JO, 2011, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V15, P1065, DOI 10.5194/hess-15-1065-2011
   Hagemann S, 2013, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V4, P129, DOI 10.5194/esd-4-129-2013
   Hagemann S, 2011, J HYDROMETEOROL, V12, P556, DOI 10.1175/2011JHM1336.1
   Hersbach H., 2018, Operational global reanalysis: progress, future directions and synergies with NWP including updates on the ERA5 production status, DOI DOI 10.21957/TKIC6G3WM
   Hickler T, 2015, CURR FOR REP, V1, P69, DOI 10.1007/s40725-015-0014-8
   Hickler T, 2012, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V21, P50, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00613.x
   Ho CK, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P21, DOI 10.1175/2011BAMS3110.1
   Hubener Heike, 2017, WDCC, DOI 10.2312/WDCC/ReKliEsDe_Ergebnisbericht
   IPCC, 2022, Annex I: Glossary, P541, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009157940.008
   Ivits E, 2016, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V25, P1131, DOI 10.1111/geb.12472
   Jacob D, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V81, P31, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9213-4
   Jacob D, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P563, DOI 10.1007/s10113-013-0499-2
   Karl TR, 1999, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V42, P3, DOI 10.1023/A:1005491526870
   Kiktev D, 2003, J CLIMATE, V16, P3560, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<3560:COMAOT>2.0.CO;2
   Lamichhane JR, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, P554, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-01090-x
   Lange Stefan, 2021, Zenodo
   Lange S, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2020EF001616
   Lange S, 2019, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V12, P3055, DOI 10.5194/gmd-12-3055-2019
   Lange Stefan., 2021, Isimip3b bias adjustment fact sheet
   Li DQ, 2015, SOL ENERGY, V120, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2015.07.033
   Liu Q, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-02690-y
   Maraun D., 2017, Statistical downscaling and bias correction for climate research. Statistical downscaling and bias correction for climate research, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781107588783
   Maraun D, 2016, CURR CLIM CHANGE REP, V2, P211, DOI 10.1007/s40641-016-0050-x
   Maraun D, 2013, J CLIMATE, V26, P2137, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00821.1
   Masson V., 2003, ECOCLIMAP GLOBAL DAT
   Maurer EP, 2014, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V18, P915, DOI 10.5194/hess-18-915-2014
   Mauritsen T, 2019, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V11, P998, DOI 10.1029/2018MS001400
   Meinshausen M, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P213, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z
   Min SK, 2011, NATURE, V470, P378, DOI 10.1038/nature09763
   Morak S, 2011, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V38, DOI 10.1029/2011GL048531
   Moss RH, 2010, NATURE, V463, P747, DOI 10.1038/nature08823
   Mueller B, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P12398, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1204330109
   Nathan RJ, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V156, P87, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02497-4
   Papadimitriou LV, 2016, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V20, P1785, DOI 10.5194/hess-20-1785-2016
   Pereira SC, 2020, INT J CLIMATOL, V40, P1255, DOI 10.1002/joc.6269
   Peterson T., 1998, REPORT ACTIVITIES WO
   Piani C, 2010, J HYDROL, V395, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.024
   Pichelli E, 2021, CLIM DYNAM, V56, P3581, DOI 10.1007/s00382-021-05657-4
   Prein AF, 2015, REV GEOPHYS, V53, P323, DOI 10.1002/2014RG000475
   Putra IDGA, 2020, AIP CONF PROC, V2223, DOI 10.1063/5.0000849
   Radinovic D, 2012, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V107, P505, DOI 10.1007/s00704-011-0495-8
   Rajczak J, 2017, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V122, P10773, DOI 10.1002/2017JD027176
   Raschendorfer M., 2001, The new turbulence parameterization of LM, P89
   Razafimaharo C, 2020, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V142, P1531, DOI 10.1007/s00704-020-03388-w
   Riahi K, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P33, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y
   RITTER B, 1992, MON WEATHER REV, V120, P303, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<0303:ACRSFN>2.0.CO;2
   Rockel B, 2008, METEOROL Z, V17, P347, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0309
   Ruti PM, 2016, B AM METEOROL SOC, V97, P1187, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00176.1
   Santos JA, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V121, P1170, DOI 10.1002/2015JD024399
   Schrodin R., 2001, The multi-layer version of the DWD soil model TERRA_LM, DOI 10.5676/DWD_pub/nwv/cosmo-tr_2
   Schuldt B, 2020, BASIC APPL ECOL, V45, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2020.04.003
   Schulz JP, 2020, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/atmos11050513
   Senf C, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-07539-6
   Sillmann J, 2008, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V86, P83, DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9308-6
   Sillmann J, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V118, P1716, DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50203
   Sillmann J, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V118, P2473, DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50188
   Smiatek G, 2008, METEOROL Z, V17, P395, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0302
   Smith B, 2014, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V11, P2027, DOI 10.5194/bg-11-2027-2014
   Smith B., 2001, LPJ-GUESS-an ecosystem modelling framework, V12, P22362
   Somot S, 2008, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V63, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.10.003
   Steppeler J, 2003, METEOROL ATMOS PHYS, V82, P75, DOI 10.1007/s00703-001-0592-9
   Switanek MB, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P2649, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-2649-2017
   Tebaldi C, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V82, P233, DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9247-2
   Teutschbein C, 2010, GEOGR COMPASS, V4, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00357.x
   Tian HQ, 2018, B AM METEOROL SOC, V99, P1231, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0212.1
   TIEDTKE M, 1989, MON WEATHER REV, V117, P1779, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1779:ACMFSF>2.0.CO;2
   Tölle MH, 2013, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V10, P2959, DOI 10.5194/bg-10-2959-2013
   Tölle MH, 2018, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V134, P829, DOI 10.1007/s00704-017-2303-6
   Van de Velde J, 2022, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V26, P2319, DOI 10.5194/hess-26-2319-2022
   van der Linden P., 2009, ENSEMBLES CLIMATE CH
   van Vuuren DP, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P5, DOI [10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z, 10.1007/s10584-011-0157-y]
   Viceto C, 2019, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/atmos10050229
   WARNANT P, 1994, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V8, P255, DOI 10.1029/94GB00850
   Wei LX, 2023, INT J CLIMATOL, V43, P219, DOI [10.1002/joc.7751, 10.1109/IECON49645.2022.9968762]
   Weigel AP, 2008, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V134, P241, DOI 10.1002/qj.210
   Wicker LJ, 2002, MON WEATHER REV, V130, P2088, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<2088:TSMFEM>2.0.CO;2
   Zhang H., 2021, ENV SCI PROC, V4, DOI [10.3390/ecas2020-08464, DOI 10.3390/ECAS2020-08464]
NR 108
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 3
U2 6
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-665X
J9 FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ
JI Front. Environ. Sci.
PD JUL 27
PY 2023
VL 11
AR 1116429
DI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1116429
PG 26
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA O7RZ2
UT WOS:001045751900001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Jordan, NR
   Kuzma, J
   Ray, DK
   Foot, K
   Snider, M
   Miller, K
   Wilensky-Lanford, E
   Amarteifio, G
AF Jordan, Nicholas R.
   Kuzma, Jennifer
   Ray, Deepak K.
   Foot, Kirsten
   Snider, Madison
   Miller, Keith
   Wilensky-Lanford, Ethan
   Amarteifio, Gifty
TI Should Gene Editing Be Used to Develop Crops for Continuous-Living-Cover
   Agriculture? A Multi-Sector Stakeholder Assessment Using a Cooperative
   Governance Approach
SO FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE gene editing; agricultural diversification; multi-stakeholder;
   governance; cover crops
ID CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE; FOOD; TECHNOLOGIES;
   RESILIENCE; CRISPR; COSTS; TRUST
AB Continuous-living-cover (CLC) agriculture integrates multiple crops to create diversified agroecosystems in which soils are covered by living plants across time and space continuously. CLC agriculture can greatly improve production of many different ecosystem services from agroecosystems, including climate adaptation and mitigation. To go to scale, CLC agriculture requires crops that not only provide continuous living cover but are viable in economic and social terms. At present, lack of such viable crops is strongly limiting the scaling of CLC agriculture. Gene editing (GE) might provide a powerful tool for developing the crops needed to expand CLC agriculture to scale. To assess this possibility, a broad multi-sector deliberative group considered the merits of GE-relative to alternative plant-breeding methods-as means for improving crops for CLC agriculture. The group included many of the sectors whose support is necessary to scaling agricultural innovations, including actors involved in markets, finance, policy, and R&D. In this article, we report findings from interviews and deliberative workshops. Many in the group were enthusiastic about prospects for applications of GE to develop crops for CLC agriculture, relative to alternative plant-breeding options. However, the group noted many issues, risks, and contingencies, all of which are likely to require responsive and adaptive management. Conversely, if these issues, risks, and contingencies cannot be managed, it appears unlikely that a strong multi-sector base of support can be sustained for such applications, limiting their scaling. Emerging methods for responsible innovation and scaling have potential to manage these issues, risks, and contingencies; we propose that outcomes from GE crops for CLC agriculture are likely to be much improved if these emerging methods are used to govern such projects. However, both GE of CLC crops and responsible innovation and scaling are unrefined innovations. Therefore, we suggest that the best pathway for exploring GE of CLC crops is to intentionally couple implementation and refinement of both kinds of innovations. More broadly, we argue that such pilot projects are urgently needed to navigate intensifying grand challenges around food and agriculture, which are likely to create intense pressures to develop genetically-engineered agricultural products and equally intense social conflict.
C1 [Jordan, Nicholas R.] Univ Minnesota, Agron & Plant Genet, St Paul, MN 55108 USA.
   [Kuzma, Jennifer] NC State Univ, Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Genet Engn & Soc Ctr, Raleigh, NC USA.
   [Ray, Deepak K.] Univ Minnesota, Inst Environm, St Paul, MN 55108 USA.
   [Foot, Kirsten; Snider, Madison; Amarteifio, Gifty] Univ Washington, Dept Commun, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.
   [Miller, Keith; Wilensky-Lanford, Ethan] Terraluna Collaborat, Minneapolis, MN USA.
C3 University of Minnesota System; University of Minnesota Twin Cities;
   North Carolina State University; University of Minnesota System;
   University of Minnesota Twin Cities; University of Washington;
   University of Washington Seattle
RP Jordan, NR (corresponding author), Univ Minnesota, Agron & Plant Genet, St Paul, MN 55108 USA.
EM jorda020@umn.edu
RI ; Ray, Deepak/F-7720-2012
OI Kuzma, Jennifer/0000-0003-4456-9613; Ray, Deepak/0000-0002-2856-9608
FU Walton Family Foundation [2019-1163]; University of Minnesota-Twin
   Cities
FX This project was supported by a grant from the Walton Family Foundation,
   2019-1163. Funds for publication fees were provided by the University of
   Minnesota-Twin Cities.
CR [Anonymous], 2019, Agroecological and other innovative approaches for sustainable agriculture and food systems that enhance food security and nutrition. A Report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security
   [Anonymous], 2021, FOREVER GREEN PARTNE
   Asbjornsen H, 2008, PLANT SOIL, V308, P69, DOI 10.1007/s11104-008-9607-3
   Asbjornsen H, 2014, RENEW AGR FOOD SYST, V29, P101, DOI 10.1017/S1742170512000385
   Bain C, 2020, AGR HUM VALUES, V37, P265, DOI 10.1007/s10460-019-09980-9
   Barrett C. B., 2020, Report of the International Expert Panel on Innovations to Build Sustainable, Equitable, Inclusive Food Value Chains
   Basche A, 2017, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V81, P1179, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2017.03.0077
   Bowles TM, 2020, ONE EARTH, V2, P284, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.007
   Brandes E, 2018, GCB BIOENERGY, V10, P199, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12481
   Burchfield EK, 2019, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V285, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2019.106615
   Center for Food Integrity, 2020, COALITION RESPONSIBL
   de Wit MM, 2020, ELEMENTA-SCI ANTHROP, V8, DOI 10.1525/elementa.405
   Delborne JA, 2020, J RESPONSIBLE INNOV, V7, P280, DOI 10.1080/23299460.2020.1738023
   Egelie KJ, 2016, NAT BIOTECHNOL, V34, P1025, DOI 10.1038/nbt.3692
   Gary SN, 2019, U CINCI LAW REV, V88, P707
   Giller KE, 2009, FIELD CROP RES, V114, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017
   Gordon DR, 2021, NAT BIOTECHNOL, V39, P1055, DOI 10.1038/s41587-021-01023-1
   Gould F, 2017, NAT BIOTECHNOL, V35, P302, DOI 10.1038/nbt.3841
   Guilengue N, 2020, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/agronomy10010021
   Herrero M, 2020, NAT FOOD, V1, P266, DOI 10.1038/s43016-020-0074-1
   Isaaa, 2018, BRIEF 54 2018 EX SUM
   Jaffe Gregory., 2021, FOOD DRUG LAW I  SUM, VSummer
   Jasanoff S, 2018, NATURE, V555, P435, DOI 10.1038/d41586-018-03270-w
   Jayaraman S, 2021, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/agriculture11080718
   Jiang GL, 2021, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/agronomy11030475
   Jordan NR, 2017, EMBO REP, V18, P1683, DOI 10.15252/embr.201744394
   Kalaitzandonakes N, 2007, NAT BIOTECHNOL, V25, P509, DOI 10.1038/nbt0507-509
   Karavolias NG, 2021, FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S, V5, DOI 10.3389/fsufs.2021.685801
   Kelrkx L, 2020, AGR SYST, V184, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102901
   King AE, 2018, ECOL APPL, V28, P249, DOI 10.1002/eap.1648
   Kofler N, 2018, SCIENCE, V362, P527, DOI 10.1126/science.aat4612
   Kremen C, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05035-170440
   Kuzma J., 2017, CONSUMER PERCEPTION
   Kuzma J, 2020, SCIENCE, V370, P916, DOI 10.1126/science.abd1512
   Kuzma J, 2021, REGUL GOV, V15, P1144, DOI 10.1111/rego.12245
   Kuzma J, 2018, ISSUES SCI TECHNOL, V35, P80
   Kuzma J, 2016, ASIAN BIOTECHN DEV R, V18, P69
   Kuzma J, 2016, NATURE, V531, P165, DOI 10.1038/531165a
   Lal R, 2020, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V75, p123A, DOI 10.2489/jswc.2020.0620A
   Landis DA, 2017, BASIC APPL ECOL, V18, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2016.07.005
   Lassoued R, 2019, GM CROPS FOOD, V10, P44, DOI 10.1080/21645698.2019.1612689
   Lemmon ZH, 2018, NAT PLANTS, V4, P766, DOI 10.1038/s41477-018-0259-x
   Lin BB, 2011, BIOSCIENCE, V61, P183, DOI 10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.4
   Lotz LAP, 2020, OUTLOOK AGR, V49, P21, DOI 10.1177/0030727020907619
   Montoliu L, 2018, CRISPR J, V1, P128, DOI 10.1089/crispr.2018.29012.mon
   Mortensen DA, 2020, FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S, V4, DOI 10.3389/fsufs.2020.564197
   NAS, 2016, GENETICALLY ENG CROP
   National Family Farm Coalition et al. v Vilsack, 2021, COMPLAINT DECLARATOR
   Nowak A., 2020, EVIDENCE RESILIENT A
   Phillips P.W.B., 2014, EC CONSEQUENCES REGU
   Plastina A, 2020, RENEW AGR FOOD SYST, V35, P38, DOI 10.1017/S1742170518000194
   Qaim M, 2020, APPL ECON PERSPECT P, V42, P129, DOI 10.1002/aepp.13044
   Resnik DB, 2018, DEV WORLD BIOETH, V18, P135, DOI 10.1111/dewb.12147
   Roberts P, 2020, ELEMENTA-SCI ANTHROP, V8, DOI 10.1525/elementa.446
   Rockström J, 2020, NAT FOOD, V1, P3, DOI 10.1038/s43016-019-0010-4
   Rose KM, 2019, PUBLIC UNDERST SCI, V28, P449, DOI 10.1177/0963662518824837
   Runck BC, 2020, COMMUN BIOL, V3, DOI 10.1038/s42003-020-1022-1
   Runck BC, 2014, CROP SCI, V54, P1939, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2014.03.0195
   Rundquist S., 2021, COM BELT PLANTING CO
   Schiek Benjamin, 2016, International Journal of Biotechnology, V14, P112, DOI 10.1504/IJBT.2016.077942
   Schulte LA, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, pE10851, DOI [10.1073/pnas.1719680114, 10.1073/pnas.1620229114]
   Shew AM, 2018, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V19, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2018.10.005
   Siegrist M, 2008, TRENDS FOOD SCI TECH, V19, P603, DOI 10.1016/j.tifs.2008.01.017
   Siegrist M, 2012, RISK ANAL, V32, P1394, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01739.x
   SLOVIC P, 1987, SCIENCE, V236, P280, DOI 10.1126/science.3563507
   Stokstad E., 2020, SCIENCE, DOI [10.1126/science.abc8305, DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.ABC8305]
   Sturgis P, 2004, PUBLIC UNDERST SCI, V13, P55, DOI 10.1177/0963662504042690
   Tamburini G, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aba1715
   Thompson PB, 2007, INT LIBR ENVIRON AGR, V10, P1, DOI 10.1007/1-4020-5791-1
   Tucker J.J., 2020, J FINANC SERV RES, V74
   USDA, 2020, DAT AM REG LETT INQ
   USDA, 2018, CONF REG STAT THLAPS
   Wayman S, 2017, RENEW AGR FOOD SYST, V32, P376, DOI [10.1017/S1742170516000338, 10.1017/s1742170516000338]
   Wigboldus S., 2020, Science, technology, and innovation for Sustainable Development Goals, P518, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780190949501.003.0025
   Willett W, 2019, LANCET, V393, P447, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4
   Yue CY, 2015, J NANOPART RES, V17, DOI 10.1007/s11051-015-3084-4
   Yue CY, 2015, J AGR ECON, V66, P308, DOI 10.1111/1477-9552.12090
   Zanetti F, 2021, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V41, DOI 10.1007/s13593-020-00663-y
NR 78
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 1
U2 15
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
SN 2296-4185
J9 FRONT BIOENG BIOTECH
JI Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
PD FEB 25
PY 2022
VL 10
AR 843093
DI 10.3389/fbioe.2022.843093
PG 17
WC Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Engineering, Biomedical
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Engineering
GA ZR1GR
UT WOS:000767541200001
PM 35284407
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Garry, FK
   Bernie, DJ
   Davie, JCS
   Pope, ECD
AF Garry, Freya K.
   Bernie, Dan J.
   Davie, Jemma C. S.
   Pope, Edward C. D.
TI Future climate risk to UK agriculture from compound events
SO CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate risk; Compound events; Multiple hazards; Future climate;
   Agriculture; Climate projections
ID HEAT-STRESS; POTATO; SIMULATIONS
AB Assessments of current and future climate risk are required for adaptation planning to increase resilience and enable society to cope with future climate hazards. Here we identify case studies of compound hazard events of interest to the UK agricultural sector and present a framework for comparing the frequency and duration of compound events now to those projected in 50 years' time. We use high resolution (12 km) simulations from the UK Climate Projections to explore how the frequency and duration of instances of potato blight and thermal heat stress to dairy cattle may change locally under RCP 8.5 emissions forcing. We combine hazard (temperature and humidity data) with vulnerability (specific threshold exceedance) and exposure (regional dairy cattle numbers/potato growing area) to estimate risk. Regions where most potatoes are grown, and where the potato blight risk is greatest in both the current and future climate, include the East of England, Yorkshire and the Humber and Eastern Scotland. By 2070, potato blight occurrences may increase by 70% in East Scotland and between 20 and 30 % across the East of England, the Midlands and Yorkshire and the Humber. Assuming dairy cattle spatial distributions remain the same, the area of greatest risk now and in the future is South West England, with notable increases in risk across Northern Ireland, Wales, the Midlands, North West England and North West Scotland. Dairy cattle heat stress (using a temperature-humidity index) is projected to increase by nearly 1000% in South West England, the region with the most dairy cattle. Finally, we consider projected changes to UK seasons, using 2018 as a template, where a cold spring followed by a warm/dry summer resulted in hay/silage shortages. In addition to reduced crop yields in 2018, cattle were kept inside for longer in the cold spring and in the warm/dry summer, due to heat stress and poor grass quality. UK Climate Projections indicate that the annual probability of cold spring/warm summer conditions will decrease in future, but the annual probability of longer dry/warm summers will increase. We conclude that the agricultural sector should consider suitable climate adaptation measures to minimise the risk of dairy cattle thermal heat stress, increased potato blight, and longer dry/warm summer conditions.
C1 [Garry, Freya K.; Bernie, Dan J.; Davie, Jemma C. S.; Pope, Edward C. D.] Met Off, Fitzroy Rd, Exeter EX1 3PB, Devon, England.
C3 Met Office - UK
RP Garry, FK (corresponding author), Met Off, Fitzroy Rd, Exeter EX1 3PB, Devon, England.
EM freya.garry@metoffice.gov.uk
RI Pope, Ed/H-9409-2017
OI Garry, Freya/0000-0002-9640-6675; Pope, Edward/0000-0002-8295-2667;
   Bernie, Dan/0000-0003-3522-8921
FU Strategic Priority Fund for UK Climate Resilience; UKRI Strategic
   Priorities Fund
FX This work was funded under the Strategic Priority Fund for UK Climate
   Resilience. The UK Climate Resilience programme is supported by the UKRI
   Strategic Priorities Fund. The programme is co-delivered by the Met
   Office and NERC on behalf of UKRI partners AHRC, EPSRC and ESRC. We
   thank colleagues at Defra and AHDB for conversations which have informed
   the content of this manuscript. We thank Theo Economou for statistical
   discussions, and all involved in the development of the UK Climate
   Projections datasets. UKCP18: The Land Component of the UK Climate
   Projections can be accessed at
   https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/b94590a87114418281a859d391ab5641.
CR AHDB, POT DIS ID
   AHDB Potatoes, 2020, GB POT PROD
   Animal & Plant Health, 2018, INF NOT WINT 2018 PO
   [Anonymous], 2016, SCOTTISH GOVT CATTLE
   [Anonymous], 1959, Weatherwise, DOI [10.1080/00431672.1959.9926960, DOI 10.1080/00431672.1959.9926960]
   ARMSTRONG DV, 1994, J DAIRY SCI, V77, P2044, DOI 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77149-6
   Barrie I. A., 2002, PPO SPECIAL REPORT, V8, P169
   Bohmanova J, 2007, J DAIRY SCI, V90, P1947, DOI 10.3168/jds.2006-513
   Bohnenstengel SI, 2011, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V137, P1625, DOI 10.1002/qj.855
   Committee on Climate Change, 2020, Land Use: Policies for a Net Zero UK
   Committee on Climate Change, 2019, PROGR PREP CLIM CHAN
   Daccache A, 2012, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V150, P161, DOI 10.1017/S0021859611000839
   Dancey S. R., 2017, Proceedings of the Sixteenth EuroBlight Workshop, 14 - 17 May 2017, Aarhus, Denmark, P53
   De Rensis F, 2015, THERIOGENOLOGY, V84, P659, DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.04.021
   Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs, 2019, STRUCT AGR IND ENGL
   Driehuis F, 2018, J DAIRY SCI, V101, P4093, DOI 10.3168/jds.2017-13836
   Dunn RJH, 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064006
   England JR, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V704, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135345
   Fahim M. A., 2003, Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, V1, P159
   Francois B, 2020, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V11, P537, DOI 10.5194/esd-11-537-2020
   Haverkort AJ, 2016, POTATO RES, V59, P35, DOI 10.1007/s11540-015-9312-6
   Hawkins E, 2009, B AM METEOROL SOC, V90, P1095, DOI 10.1175/2009BAMS2607.1
   Hersbach H, 2020, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V146, P1999, DOI 10.1002/qj.3803
   Hillier JK, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P595, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0832-y
   Hollis D, 2019, GEOSCI DATA J, V6, P151, DOI 10.1002/gdj3.78
   Jo KR, 2014, BMC BIOTECHNOL, V14, DOI 10.1186/1472-6750-14-50
   Jones JDG, 2014, PHILOS T R SOC B, V369, DOI [10.1098/rstb.2013.0087, 10.1098/rstb.2013.008]
   Keane T., 1982, AGROMETEOROLOGICAL M, V8
   Landaeta-Hernández A, 2011, TROP ANIM HEALTH PRO, V43, P657, DOI 10.1007/s11250-010-9749-1
   Lowe J. A., 2019, UKCP18 science overview report
   Mader TL, 2006, J ANIM SCI, V84, P712, DOI 10.2527/2006.843712x
   McCarthy M, 2019, WEATHER, V74, P390, DOI 10.1002/wea.3628
   Olesen JE, 2011, EUR J AGRON, V34, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2010.11.003
   Oppenheimer M, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1039
   Pacilly FCA, 2019, CROP PROT, V119, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.01.010
   Poisky L, 2017, J DAIRY SCI, V100, P8645, DOI 10.3168/jds.2017-12651
   Riahi K, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P33, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y
   Schoeneberger M, 2012, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V67, p128A, DOI 10.2489/jswc.67.5.128A
   Switanek MB, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P2649, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-2649-2017
   van der Wiel K, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab7668
   West JW, 2003, J DAIRY SCI, V86, P2131, DOI 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73803-X
   Williams KD, 2018, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V10, P357, DOI 10.1002/2017MS001115
   Yawson DO, 2016, CLIMATE, V4, DOI 10.3390/cli4040054
   Zscheischler J, 2020, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V1, P333, DOI 10.1038/s43017-020-0060-z
   Zscheischler J, 2020, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V29, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2020.100270
   Zscheischler J, 2019, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V10, P31, DOI 10.5194/esd-10-31-2019
NR 46
TC 12
Z9 12
U1 6
U2 64
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0963
J9 CLIM RISK MANAG
JI CLIM. RISK MANAG.
PY 2021
VL 32
AR 100282
DI 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100282
EA FEB 2021
PG 13
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA SU8EJ
UT WOS:000663363200001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Jin, YF
   Chen, B
   Lampinen, BD
   Brown, PH
AF Jin, Yufang
   Chen, Bin
   Lampinen, Bruce D.
   Brown, Patrick H.
TI Advancing Agricultural Production With Machine Learning Analytics: Yield
   Determinants for California's Almond Orchards
SO FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Prunus dulcis; yield gap; artificial intelligence; big data; light
   interceptioon; nutrient management
ID TEMPERATURE; CROPS; PRECIPITATION; TREE
AB Agricultural productivity is subject to various stressors, including abiotic and biotic threats, many of which are exacerbated by a changing climate, thereby affecting long-term sustainability. The productivity of tree crops such as almond orchards, is particularly complex. To understand and mitigate these threats requires a collection of multi-layer large data sets, and advanced analytics is also critical to integrate these highly heterogeneous datasets to generate insights about the key constraints on the yields at tree and field scales. Here we used a machine learning approach to investigate the determinants of almond yield variation in California's almond orchards, based on a unique 10-year dataset of field measurements of light interception and almond yield along with meteorological data. We found that overall the maximum almond yield was highly dependent on light interception, e.g., with each one percent increase in light interception resulting in an increase of 57.9 lbs/acre in the potential yield. Light interception was highest for mature sites with higher long term mean spring incoming solar radiation (SRAD), and lowest for younger orchards when March maximum temperature was lower than 19 degrees C. However, at any given level of light interception, actual yield often falls significantly below full yield potential, driven mostly by tree age, temperature profiles in June and winter, summer mean daily maximum vapor pressure deficit (VPDmax), and SRAD. Utilizing a full random forest model, 82% (+/- 1%) of yield variation could be explained when using a sixfold cross validation, with a RMSE of 480 +/- 9 lbs/acre. When excluding light interception from the predictors, overall orchard characteristics (such as age, location, and tree density) and inclusive meteorological variables could still explain 78% of yield variation. The model analysis also showed that warmer winter conditions often limited mature orchards from reaching maximum yield potential and summer VPDmax beyond 40 hPa significantly limited the yield. Our findings through the machine learning approach improved our understanding of the complex interaction between climate, canopy light interception, and almond nut production, and demonstrated a relatively robust predictability of almond yield. This will ultimately benefit data-driven climate adaptation and orchard nutrient management approaches.
C1 [Jin, Yufang; Chen, Bin] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
   [Lampinen, Bruce D.; Brown, Patrick H.] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
C3 University of California System; University of California Davis;
   University of California System; University of California Davis
RP Jin, YF (corresponding author), Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
EM yujin@ucdavis.edu
RI Chen, Bin/ABD-5074-2021; Brown, Patrick/E-4085-2012
OI Brown, Patrick/0000-0001-6857-8608; Chen, Bin/0000-0003-3496-2876
FU USDA California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) Specialty Crop
   Block Grant Program [SCB16036];  [CA-D-PLS-2016-H];  [CA-D-LAW-2296-H]
FX This work was supported by a project (SCB16036) funded by the USDA
   California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) Specialty Crop
   Block Grant Program. Research conducted under agricultural experimental
   station projects CA-D-PLS-2016-H to PB and CA-D-LAW-2296-H to YJ.
CR Baram S, 2016, VADOSE ZONE J, V15, DOI 10.2136/vzj2016.07.0061
   Belgiu M, 2016, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V114, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011
   Bellon-Maurel V, 2010, TRAC-TREND ANAL CHEM, V29, P1073, DOI 10.1016/j.trac.2010.05.006
   Bendig J, 2015, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V39, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2015.02.012
   Breiman L., 2001, Machine Learning, V45, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Burow KR, 2013, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V69, P2609, DOI 10.1007/s12665-012-2082-4
   California Department of Food and Agriculture, 2017, CAL AGR STAT REV
   Carletto G., 2015, 7150 WPS WORLD BANK
   Chen B, 2019, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V156, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.08.006
   Chen B, 2019, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V151, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.03.012
   Connell J. H., 2000, HortTechnology, V10, P116
   Daly C, 2008, INT J CLIMATOL, V28, P2031, DOI 10.1002/joc.1688
   Daly C, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0141140
   Davis K., 2013, FOOD SECURITY 21 CEN
   DeJong TM, 2019, EUR J HORTIC SCI, V84, P117, DOI [10.17660/eJHS.2019/84.3.1|, 10.17660/eJHS.2019/84.3.1]
   Elliott J, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3239, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1222474110
   Faunt CC, 2016, HYDROGEOL J, V24, P675, DOI 10.1007/s10040-015-1339-x
   Funk CC, 2009, FOOD SECUR, V1, P271, DOI 10.1007/s12571-009-0026-y
   Grömping U, 2009, AM STAT, V63, P308, DOI 10.1198/tast.2009.08199
   Jeong JH, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0156571
   Johansen K, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10060854
   Kerr A, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V148, P419, DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-2011-3
   Lampinen BD, 2012, HORTTECHNOLOGY, V22, P237, DOI 10.21273/HORTTECH.22.2.237
   Lesk C, 2016, NATURE, V529, P84, DOI 10.1038/nature16467
   Liu H, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11050595
   Lobell DB, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V81, P187, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9141-3
   Lobell DB, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P317, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0303-6
   Luedeling E, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006166
   National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, 2019, SCI BREAKTHR ADV FOO
   Pathak TB, 2018, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/agronomy8030025
   Reynolds M, 2008, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V11, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.02.005
   Rosenzweig C., 2001, GLOBAL CHANGE HUMAN, V2, P90, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1015086831467
   Tewes A, 2018, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/agronomy8020016
   THORNTON P., 2017, Daymet: Daily Surface Weather Data on a 1-km Grid for North America, Version3
   Tilman D, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P20260, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1116437108
   Tombesi S, 2010, J HORTIC SCI BIOTECH, V85, P317, DOI 10.1080/14620316.2010.11512674
   Tombesi S, 2017, CALIF AGR, V71, P68, DOI 10.3733/ca.2016a0024
   USDA-NASS, 2018, NONC FRUITS NUTS 201
   Welling S.H., 2016, FOREST FLOOR VISUALI
   Zarate-Valdez JL, 2015, EUR J AGRON, V66, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2015.02.004
   Zhang XY, 2003, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V84, P471, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00135-9
   Zhang Z, 2019, FRONT PLANT SCI, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2019.00809
NR 42
TC 21
Z9 24
U1 1
U2 30
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
SN 1664-462X
J9 FRONT PLANT SCI
JI Front. Plant Sci.
PD MAR 13
PY 2020
VL 11
AR 290
DI 10.3389/fpls.2020.00290
PG 15
WC Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences
GA LC7XE
UT WOS:000525545800001
PM 32231679
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, SF
   Yan, SS
   Zhao, JL
   Xiong, HH
   An, PQ
   Wang, JH
   Zhang, HG
   Zhang, L
AF Zhang, Sufang
   Yan, Shanshan
   Zhao, Jiali
   Xiong, Huanhuan
   An, Peiqi
   Wang, Junhui
   Zhang, Hanguo
   Zhang, Lei
TI Identification of miRNAs and their target genes in Larix olgensis and
   verified of differential expression miRNAs
SO BMC PLANT BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE miRNA; Larix olgensis; Target gene; Differential expression
ID TRANSLATIONAL INHIBITION; CLIMATIC ADAPTATION; ECTOPIC EXPRESSION;
   EPIGENETIC MEMORY; STRESS RESPONSES; ABIOTIC STRESS; SMALL RNAS;
   ARABIDOPSIS; MICRORNAS; PLANT
AB BackgroundMiRNAs (microRNA) are 18-24nt endogenous noncoding RNAs that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level, including tissue-specific, developmental timing and evolutionary conservation gene expression.ResultsThis study used high-throughput sequencing technology for the first time in Larix olgensis, predicted 78 miRNAs, including 12,229,003 reads sRNA, screened differentially expressed miRNAs. Predicting target genes was helpful for understanding the miRNA regulation function and obtained 333 corresponding target genes. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) functional annotation were analysed, mostly including nucleic acid binding, plant hormone signal transduction, pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, and cellulose synthase. This study will lay the foundation for clarifying the complex miRNA-mediated regulatory network for growth and development. In view of this, spatio-temporal expression of miR396, miR950, miR164, miR166 and miR160 were analysed in Larix olgensis during the growth stages of not lignified, beginning of lignification, and completely lignified in different tissues (root, stem, and leaf) by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). There were differences in the expression of miRNAs in roots, stems and leaves in the same growth period. At 60days, miR160, miR166 and miR396-2 exhibited the highest expression in leaves. At 120days, most miRNAs in roots and stems decreased significantly. At 180days, miRNAs were abundantly expressed in roots and stems. Meanwhile, analysis of the expression of miRNAs in leaves revealed that miR396-2 was reduced as time went on, whereas other miRNAs increased initially and then decreased. On the other hand, in the stems, miR166-1 was increase, whereas other miRNAs, especially miR160, miR164, miR396 and miR950-1, first decreased and then increased. Similarly, in the roots, miR950-2 first decreased and then increased, whereas other miRNAs exhibited a trend of continuous increase.ConclusionsThe present investigation included rapid isolation and identification of miRNAs in Larix olgensis through construction of a sRNA library using Solexa and predicted 78 novel miRNAs, which showed differential expression levels in different tissues and stages. These results provided a theoretical basis for further revealing the genetic regulation mechanism of miRNA in the growth and development of conifers and the verification of function in target genes.
C1 [Zhang, Sufang; Yan, Shanshan; Zhao, Jiali; Xiong, Huanhuan; An, Peiqi; Zhang, Hanguo; Zhang, Lei] Northeast Forestry Univ, State Key Lab Tree Genet & Breeding, Harbin 150040, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Junhui] Chinese Acad Forestry, State Key Lab Tree Genet & Breeding, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
C3 Northeast Forestry University - China; Chinese Academy of Forestry;
   State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics & Breeding, CAF
RP Zhang, HG; Zhang, L (corresponding author), Northeast Forestry Univ, State Key Lab Tree Genet & Breeding, Harbin 150040, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China.
EM 171998329@qq.com; hanguozhang1@sina.com; zhanglei@nefu.edu.cn
FU National Science and Technology Major Project [2018ZX08020-003]; Chinese
   National Natural Science Foundation [31700595]; Chinese National
   Programs for High Technlogy Research and Development [2013AA102704];
   Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2572016CA08]
FX The manuscript was written with the funding from National Science and
   Technology Major Project (2018ZX08020-003) and Chinese National Natural
   Science Foundation (31700595). The design of the experiment and the
   collection of samples was supported by Chinese National Programs for
   High Technlogy Research and Development (2013AA102704). Illumina
   sequencing and data analysis were supported by the Fundamental Research
   Funds for the Central Universities(2572016CA08)
CR Achakzai HK, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0200033
   Apweiler R, 2004, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V32, pD115, DOI [10.1093/nar/gkh131, 10.1093/nar/gkw1099]
   Ashburner M, 2000, NAT GENET, V25, P25, DOI 10.1038/75556
   Aukerman MJ, 2003, PLANT CELL, V15, P2730, DOI 10.1105/tpc.016238
   Bari R, 2006, PLANT PHYSIOL, V141, P988, DOI 10.1104/pp.106.079707
   Bartel DP, 2004, CELL, V116, P281, DOI 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5
   Baucher M, 2013, PLANT BIOLOGY, V15, P892, DOI 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00696.x
   BENJAMINI Y, 1995, J R STAT SOC B, V57, P289, DOI 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
   Boualem A, 2008, PLANT J, V54, P876, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03448.x
   Brennecke J, 2007, CELL, V128, P1089, DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.043
   Brodersen P, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P1185, DOI 10.1126/science.1159151
   Cakir C, 2010, CROP SCI, V50, pS77, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2009.10.0567
   Carrington JC, 2003, SCIENCE, V301, P336, DOI 10.1126/science.1085242
   Chen M, 2010, COMPUT BIOL CHEM, V34, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2010.10.001
   Chen XM, 2004, SCIENCE, V303, P2022, DOI 10.1126/science.1088060
   Chen XM, 2009, ANNU REV CELL DEV BI, V25, P21, DOI 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113417
   Deng YT, 2018, PLOS PATHOG, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006756
   Eddy SR, 1998, BIOINFORMATICS, V14, P755, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755
   Fahlgren N, 2007, PLOS ONE, V2, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0000219
   Fire A, 1998, NATURE, V391, P806, DOI 10.1038/35888
   Gandikota M, 2007, PLANT J, V49, P683, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02983.x
   Guo HS, 2005, PLANT CELL, V17, P1376, DOI 10.1105/tpc.105.030841
   Gutierrez L, 2012, PLANT CELL, V24, P2515, DOI 10.1105/tpc.112.099119
   Jones-Rhoades MW, 2006, ANNU REV PLANT BIOL, V57, P19, DOI 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105218
   Jones-Rhoades MW, 2004, MOL CELL, V14, P787, DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.027
   Joshi H., 2018, INT J CURR MICROBIOL, V7, P1275, DOI [10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.154, DOI 10.20546/IJCMAS.2018.705.154]
   Kanehisa M, 2004, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V32, pD277, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkh063
   Kim B, 2012, BMC PLANT BIOL, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-12-218
   Koonin EV, 2004, GENOME BIOL, V5, DOI 10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r7
   Langmead B, 2009, GENOME BIOL, V10, DOI 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25
   Laufs P, 2004, DEVELOPMENT, V131, P4311, DOI 10.1242/dev.01320
   Li J, 2012, BMC PLANT BIOL, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-12-220
   Lindsey K, 2002, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V7, P78, DOI 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02194-X
   Liu DM, 2009, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V136, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01229.x
   Liu Q, 2009, BIOCHEM BIOPH RES CO, V384, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.04.028
   Livak KJ, 2001, METHODS, V25, P402, DOI 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
   Llave C, 2002, SCIENCE, V297, P2053, DOI 10.1126/science.1076311
   Lu SF, 2007, PLANT J, V51, P1077, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03208.x
   Lu X, 2017, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V115, P418, DOI 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.04.009
   Mallory AC, 2005, PLANT CELL, V17, P1360, DOI 10.1105/tpc.105.031716
   Margulies M, 2005, NATURE, V437, P376, DOI 10.1038/nature03959
   Morin RD, 2008, GENOME RES, V18, P571, DOI 10.1101/gr.6897308
   Oh TJ, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V179, P67, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02448.x
   Qi Y, 2005, MOL CELL, V19, P421, DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.014
   Qin YR, 2011, PLANT CELL REP, V30, P1893, DOI 10.1007/s00299-011-1096-9
   Qiu DY, 2009, GENE, V436, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.gene.2009.01.006
   Reinhart BJ, 2002, GENE DEV, V16, P1616, DOI 10.1101/gad.1004402
   Rodriguez RE, 2010, DEVELOPMENT, V137, P103, DOI 10.1242/dev.043067
   Romualdi C, 2003, PHYSIOL GENOMICS, V12, P159, DOI 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00096.2002
   Rounsley S, 2009, RICE, V2, P35, DOI 10.1007/s12284-009-9025-z
   Schmittgen TD, 2008, METHODS, V44, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.ymeth.2007.09.006
   Shi T, 2016, PLANTSIGNAL BEHAV, V11, P1
   Starega-Roslan J, 2015, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V43, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkv968
   Stührwohldt N, 2019, PLANT BIOLOGY, V21, P49, DOI 10.1111/plb.12881
   Sunkar R, 2007, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V12, P301, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.05.001
   Tatusov RL, 2000, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V28, P33, DOI 10.1093/nar/28.1.33
   Tian C, 2004, PLANT J, V40, P333, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02220.x
   Xie ZX, 2003, CURR BIOL, V13, P784, DOI 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00281-1
   Yakovlev IA, 2011, PLANT SCI, V180, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.07.004
   Yakovlev IA, 2010, NEW PHYTOL, V187, P1154, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03341.x
   YANG H, 1923, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V96, P13560
   Yang JS, 2011, RNA, V17, P312, DOI 10.1261/rna.2537911
   Yoon WH, 2011, NAT CELL BIOL, V13, P1062, DOI 10.1038/ncb2316
   Yu K, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059831
   Zhou XF, 2007, MOL SYST BIOL, V3, DOI 10.1038/msb4100143
   Zhu H, 2012, BMC PLANT BIOL, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-12-149
   Zhuo XK, 2018, GENES-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/genes9100494
NR 67
TC 7
Z9 8
U1 4
U2 30
PU BMC
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND
SN 1471-2229
J9 BMC PLANT BIOL
JI BMC Plant Biol.
PD JUN 11
PY 2019
VL 19
AR 247
DI 10.1186/s12870-019-1853-4
PG 20
WC Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences
GA IC9VV
UT WOS:000471333500002
PM 31185902
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Devkota, KP
   Bouasria, A
   Devkota, M
   Nangia, V
AF Devkota, Krishna Prasad
   Bouasria, Abdelkrim
   Devkota, Mina
   Nangia, Vinay
TI Predicting wheat yield gap and its determinants combining remote
   sensing, machine learning, and survey approaches in rainfed
   Mediterranean regions of Morocco
SO EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY
LA English
DT Article
DE Predictors of yield gap; Vegetation indices (EVI2 CGVI MSR NDVI,; OSAVI
   RVI); Customized agronomic solution; Drought risk minimization; Climate
   resilient drylands
ID LEAF-AREA INDEX; VEGETATION INDEXES; TERRESTRIAL; INFORMATION;
   MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; MODELS; CROPS; WATER; NDVI
AB Wheat plays a crucial role in Morocco 's food security, economic stability, and livelihoods of farming communities. Assessing key vegetation indices (as yield predictors), along with understanding potential yield, yield gap, and major determinants for this gap at regional and national scales, is vital for improving food security with resilience in variable climatic conditions. Analysing the yield gap and its causes during drought and optimal weather conditions can reduce crop failure risks and enhance productivity specially in variable rainfed production systems. This study aimed to develop scalable methodology to predict field- and landscape-level yield and yield gaps for wheat and their underlying causes examplifying Morocco 's rainfed production environment combining remote sensing, machine learning, and ground information. By analysing six vegetation indices (EVI2, CGVI, MSR, NDVI, OSAVI, and RVI) derived from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery (10 m resolution) over three successive growing seasons (2018 -2019, 2019 -2020, and 2020 -2021), the study employed advanced vegetation index models for accurate prediction of wheat yields and yield gaps at plot and on a larger regional scale within the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region. To identify the determinants of yield gap, climate and soil datasets were merged with crop management information and the random forest model was fine-tuned and assessed for each season and cumulatively. The findings highlighted that RVI, GCVI, and NDVI vegetation indices were particularly effective in predicting wheat yields, showing the highest R 2 and the lowest prediction errors (RMSE). Such predictive methodologies are crucial for policymakers to proactively plan and mitigate risk minimization and adaption plans at regional and national levels. The models predicted rainfed potential yields of 5.99, 1.53, and 4.66 t ha -1 , with corresponding yield gap of 3.38, 0.73, and 1.58 t ha -1 for the seasons of 2018/2019 (favorable); 2019/2020 (drought) and 2020/2021 (favorable), respectively. Across three periods, critical factors determining yield include soil moisture, total rainfall during the crop growing period, evapotranspiration, and soil texture and carbon content. To minimize drought risks and maximize benefits during variable rainfall conditions, it is essential to implement pre-season drought forecasts, customize seeding dates based on soil moisture, adopt technologies that enhance soil moisture retention, and utilize climate-adapted farming practices in the semi -arid and arid rainfed regions.
C1 [Devkota, Krishna Prasad; Devkota, Mina; Nangia, Vinay] Int Ctr Agr Res Dry Areas ICARDA, Rabat, Morocco.
   [Bouasria, Abdelkrim] Chouaib Doukkali Univ, El Jadida, Morocco.
   [Bouasria, Abdelkrim] Agmetrix, El Jadida, Morocco.
C3 CGIAR; International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas
   (ICARDA); Chouaib Doukkali University of El Jadida
RP Devkota, KP; Devkota, M (corresponding author), Int Ctr Agr Res Dry Areas ICARDA, Rabat, Morocco.
EM k.devkota@cgiar.org; m.devkota@cgiar.org
RI Bouasria, Abdelkrim/AAB-2827-2022
OI Devkota, Krishna/0000-0002-2179-8395
FU One CGIAR Initiatives: Fragility to Resilience in Central and West Asia
   and North Africa (F2R-CWANA (ICARDA) [200289]; Excellence in Agronomy
   (EiA)
FX This study was supported by One CGIAR Initiatives: Fragility to
   Resilience in Central and West Asia and North Africa (F2R-CWANA (ICARDA
   agreement number 200289) , and Excellence in Agronomy (EiA) .
CR Abatzoglou JT, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2017.191
   Abatzoglou JT, 2013, INT J CLIMATOL, V33, P121, DOI 10.1002/joc.3413
   Aboudrare A, 2006, AGR WATER MANAGE, V83, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.12.001
   AghaKouchak A, 2015, NATURE, V524, P409, DOI 10.1038/524409a
   Amberger A., 2006, Soil fertility and plant nutrition in the tropics and subtropics
   Amgain LP, 2021, J PLANT NUTR, V44, P2258, DOI 10.1080/01904167.2021.1889590
   Ash A, 2007, AUST J AGR RES, V58, P952, DOI 10.1071/AR06188
   Atzberger C, 2013, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V5, P949, DOI 10.3390/rs5020949
   Balaghi R, 2013, Agrometeorological cereal yield forecasting in Morocco
   Balaghi R, 2008, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V10, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2006.12.001
   Becker-Reshef I, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P1312, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2010.01.010
   Belmahi M, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15112707
   Bendidi A., 2016, J. Exp. Agric. Int, V14, P1, DOI [10.9734/jeai/2016/30216, DOI 10.9734/JEAI/2016/30216]
   BHATTI AU, 1991, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V37, P181, DOI 10.1016/0034-4257(91)90080-P
   Bouslihim Y, 2024, ANN GIS, V30, P215, DOI 10.1080/19475683.2024.2309868
   Breiman L., 2012, Package'randomForest', V29, DOI DOI 10.5244/C.22.54
   Breiman Leo, 2001, MACH LEARN, V45, P5
   Chen Jing M, 1996, Can. J. Remote Sens, V22, P229, DOI DOI 10.1080/07038992.1996.10855178
   dela Torre DMG, 2021, GEO-SPAT INF SCI, V24, P695, DOI 10.1080/10095020.2021.1984183
   Devkota KP, 2023, EUR J AGRON, V151, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2023.126973
   Devkota KP, 2021, AGR SYST, V192, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103182
   Devkota KP, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V105, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.05.029
   Devkota M, 2022, AGR SYST, V201, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103470
   Devkota M, 2020, AGR SYST, V185, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102946
   Diacono M, 2013, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V33, P219, DOI 10.1007/s13593-012-0111-z
   Dong TF, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V222, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.032
   El Mourid M., 1996, Al Awamia, V92, P69
   FAOSTAT, 2024, United Nations Food and Agricultural Organisation WWW Document
   Feng W, 2019, PRECIS AGRIC, V20, P1157, DOI 10.1007/s11119-019-09648-8
   Field CB, 1998, SCIENCE, V281, P237, DOI 10.1126/science.281.5374.237
   Foley JA, 2011, NATURE, V478, P337, DOI 10.1038/nature10452
   Howden SM, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P19691, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701890104
   Jain M, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8228
   Jiang ZY, 2008, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V112, P3833, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.006
   JORDAN CF, 1969, ECOLOGY, V50, P663, DOI 10.2307/1936256
   Kamir E, 2020, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V160, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.11.008
   Kanke Y, 2016, PRECIS AGRIC, V17, P507, DOI 10.1007/s11119-016-9433-1
   Kuhn M., 2022, R. Package Version, V6, P0
   Lehmann J, 2020, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V47, DOI 10.1029/2020GL087516
   Li CX, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14102458
   Lobell DB, 2015, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V164, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2015.04.021
   Lobell DB, 2013, FIELD CROP RES, V143, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.08.008
   MACDONALD RB, 1980, SCIENCE, V208, P670, DOI 10.1126/science.208.4445.670
   MAJOR DJ, 1990, INT J REMOTE SENS, V11, P727, DOI 10.1080/01431169008955053
   Nguy-Robertson AL, 2014, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V192, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.03.004
   Son NT, 2020, ADV SPACE RES, V65, P1910, DOI 10.1016/j.asr.2020.01.028
   Pala M., 2011, INT CTR AGR RES DRY, Viv, P921
   Paliwal A., 2022, Driv. Smallhold. Syst., DOI [10.21203/rs.3.rs-1654249/v1, DOI 10.21203/RS.3.RS-1654249/V1]
   Poggio L, 2021, SOIL-GERMANY, V7, P217, DOI 10.5194/soil-7-217-2021
   Pretty J, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P441, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0114-0
   Ray DK, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0066428
   Rockström J, 2017, AMBIO, V46, P4, DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0793-6
   Rondeaux G, 1996, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V55, P95, DOI 10.1016/0034-4257(95)00186-7
   Rouse J.W., 1974, Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS
   Sheffield J, 2008, J CLIMATE, V21, P432, DOI 10.1175/2007JCLI1822.1
   Shen JX, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13112202
   Shuai GY, 2022, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V272, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2022.112938
   Teuling AJ, 2011, INT J CLIMATOL, V31, P1408, DOI 10.1002/joc.2153
   Ulfa F, 2022, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/agronomy12020384
   Vidican R, 2023, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/agronomy13123040
   Waldner F, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-51715-7
   Wang Q, 2005, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V94, P244, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2004.10.006
   Zhao Y, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12061024
   Zhu WanXue Zhu WanXue, 2018, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, V34, P78
NR 64
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 9
U2 14
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1161-0301
EI 1873-7331
J9 EUR J AGRON
JI Eur. J. Agron.
PD AUG
PY 2024
VL 158
AR 127195
DI 10.1016/j.eja.2024.127195
EA MAY 2024
PG 14
WC Agronomy
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA TN9O0
UT WOS:001242061400001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Hawkins, P
   Geza, W
   Mabhaudhi, T
   Sutherland, C
   Queenan, K
   Dangour, A
   Scheelbeek, P
AF Hawkins, Poppy
   Geza, Wendy
   Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe
   Sutherland, Catherine
   Queenan, Kevin
   Dangour, Alan
   Scheelbeek, Pauline
TI Dietary and agricultural adaptations to drought among smallholder
   farmers in South Africa: A qualitative study
SO WEATHER AND CLIMATE EXTREMES
LA English
DT Article
DE South Africa; Climate change; Climate extremes; Food consumption; Food
   insecurity; Community resilience; Vulnerability
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; IMPACTS; HEALTH; RESILIENCE; PERCEPTION; MITIGATION;
   DIVERSITY; WORLD; FOODS; WATER
AB Building resilience to environmental change is an integral part of long-term climate adaptation planning and local policy. There is an increased understanding of the impact of climate change on global crop production however, little focus has been given to local adaptation pathways and rural smallholder community responses, especially regarding food security. It is becoming increasingly evident that local level decision-making plays a vital role in reducing vulnerability to environmental change. This research aimed to qualitatively investigate coping and adaptive strategies adopted by smallholder farming households to respond to the impacts of drought in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Focus group discussions (n = 7) consisting of 5-9 participants and individual interviews (n = 9) using pre-tested topic guides, involving a total of 57 adults were conducted in rural areas of drought-affected districts: Msinga, Richmond and Umbumbulu of KwaZulu-Natal, in July 2018. The data were analysed using thematic analysis in NVivo 12. Thematic analysis identified three principal themes: 1. Perceived effects of droughts on the local food system and diets; 2. Current coping strategies; and 3. Enablers for successful adaptation. All sites reported a change in food consumption habits, with the majority perceiving drought to be the main driver behind a shift from vegetable-based to starch-based diets and decreased animal source food consumption. Only short-term coping strategies were implemented across the study sites. However, knowledge of long-term adaptation strategies existed but was unattainable to most respondents. Recommendations of perceived context-specific long-term adaptation strategies that could be used at a local scale were communicated by the respondents. However, they would need external help to actualize them. A need exists to support smallholder communities' short-term response methods to drought to achieve more holistic resilience and successful adaptation. Short-term adaptation strategies, if implemented alone, often have significant tradeoffs with longer-term adaptation and building resilience. This study highlights the need for targeted, contextualised policy solutions to improve smallholder productivity during drought through a strategic combination of both short- and longer-term adaptation measures, i.e. short-term adaptation should be guided by a long-term adaptation strategy. Proper planning, including the use of climate scenarios combined with information on nutritional status, is needed to develop context-specific and transformative adaptation strategies. These strategies should aim to strengthen resilience at a local level and should be included as policy recommendations.
C1 [Hawkins, Poppy] Univ Hertfordshire, Ctr Agr Food & Environm Management CAFEM, Hatfield, Herts, England.
   [Geza, Wendy; Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Agr Earth & Environm Sci, Durban, South Africa.
   [Sutherland, Catherine] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Built Environm Dev Studies, Durban, South Africa.
   [Queenan, Kevin] Royal Vet Coll, Dept Pathobiol & Populat Sci, London, England.
   [Dangour, Alan; Scheelbeek, Pauline] London Sch Hyg Trop Med, Ctr Climate Change Planetary Hlth, London, England.
C3 University of Hertfordshire; University of Kwazulu Natal; University of
   Kwazulu Natal; University of London; University of London Royal
   Veterinary College; University of London; London School of Hygiene &
   Tropical Medicine
RP Scheelbeek, P (corresponding author), London Sch Hyg Trop Med, Ctr Climate Change Planetary Hlth, Room 134,Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, England.
EM pauline.scheelbeek@lshtm.ac.uk
RI Hawkins, Poppy/KBA-1817-2024; Geza, Wendy/IUO-9228-2023; Mabhaudhi,
   Tafadzwanashe/AAF-2418-2019
OI Hawkins, Poppy/0000-0002-8004-1237; Mabhaudhi,
   Tafadzwanashe/0000-0002-9323-8127; Geza, Wendy/0000-0003-2460-4151
FU Wellcome Trust "Our Planet Our Health Programme" [205200/Z/16/z];
   Adaptation Fund
FX This research was funded by the Wellcome Trust "Our Planet Our Health
   Programme" Grant number: (205200/Z/16/z). The uMngeni Resilience
   Project, which is funded by the Adaptation Fund, is acknowledged for
   providing support for this study. Professor Albert Modi, Dean and head
   of the School of Agricultural, Earth & Environmental Sciences at The
   University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN) provided expert knowledge on the
   drought and irrigation systems of the Tugela Ferry study sites. Dr.
   Suveshnee Munien, the farmers support group and the UKZN sustainable and
   healthy food systems (SHEFS) team helped shape the project to have more
   of a local focus, assisting in the identification of drought affected
   areas in South Africa. Meeting with Ms Laurencia Govender a PhD
   Candidate and Lecturer in Dietetics at UKZN helped structure my topic
   guides in regards to rural diets in the area.
CR ABUKUTSA-ONYANGO M.O., 2010, African indigenous vegetables in Kenya: strategic repositioning in the horticultural sector
   Adger N, 2007, INTERGOVERNMENTAL PA
   Aggarwal PK, 2010, WATER RESOUR DEV MAN, P49, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-04615-5_3
   Ali S, 2017, FOODS, V6, DOI 10.3390/foods6060039
   Aliber M, 2009, AGREKON, V48, P434, DOI 10.1080/03031853.2009.9523835
   Alissa EM, 2017, CRIT REV FOOD SCI, V57, P1950, DOI 10.1080/10408398.2015.1040487
   [Anonymous], 2008, CLIMATE CHANGE WATER
   [Anonymous], 2018, KZ2 44 MSING MUN INT
   [Anonymous], 2015, Micronutrient deficiencies
   [Anonymous], 2017, General Household Survey
   Arimond M, 2010, J NUTR, V140, p2059S, DOI 10.3945/jn.110.123414
   Ashraf M, 2013, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V5, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.05.002
   Bain LE, 2013, PAN AFR MED J, V15, DOI 10.11604/pamj.2013.15.120.2535
   Bakhshandeh S, 2019, J AGRON CROP SCI, V205, P157, DOI 10.1111/jac.12314
   Barros V, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, pIX
   Basdew M., 2017, Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems, V3, DOI DOI 10.1515/CASS-2017-0006
   Belesova K, 2020, LANCET, V395, P96, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33042-9
   Boko M, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P433
   Brinkman HJ, 2010, J NUTR, V140, p153S, DOI 10.3945/jn.109.110767
   Browne M., 2007, Agrekon, V46, P566
   Buthelezi N.N, 2010, USE SCI INDIGENOUS K
   Campbell-Lendrum D, 2007, J URBAN HEALTH, V84, pI109, DOI 10.1007/s11524-007-9170-x
   Chatterjee A., 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE PRINC, Vfirst
   Chivenge P, 2015, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V12, P5685, DOI 10.3390/ijerph120605685
   Claasen N, 2016, FOOD ENV HLTH NUTR S, V34
   Climate Data.Org, 2018, CLIM DAT KWAZULU NAT
   Coelho A.E.L, 2015, REV INTERAM PSICOLOG, V38
   Connolly-Boutin L, 2016, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V16, P385, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0761-x
   Costello A., 2009, Lancet, V373, P1693, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60935-1
   Darcan NK, 2018, SMALL RUMINANT RES, V163, P34, DOI [10.1016/j.smallrumres.2017.04.013, 10.1016/j.smallrurnres.2017.04.013]
   Daryanto S, 2017, AGR WATER MANAGE, V179, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.04.022
   Das H.P, 2012, Agrometeorology in extreme events and natural disasters
   Department of environmental affairs report, 2018, LTAS PROGR TECH REP
   DWS (Department of Water and Sanitation), 2019, Governing Board Induction Manual, P1
   FAO, 2012, CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPT
   FAO, IMP DIS AGR FOOD SEC
   Fao I.F.A.D., 2017, STAT FOOD SEC NUTR W
   Flick U., 2004, A companion to qualitative research, P146, DOI DOI 10.3316/QRJ0802081
   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2016, S AFR AQUASTAT
   Garikai M, 2014, ASSESSMENT VEGETABLE
   Grace D., 2018, The influence of livestock-derived foods on nutrition during the first 1,000 days of life, policy brief 25
   Hardy M., 2011, Rainfed Farming Systems, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4020-9132-216, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-9132-2, 10.1007/978-1-4020-9132-2, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-9132-216]
   Headey D, 2018, AM J AGR ECON, V100, P1302, DOI 10.1093/ajae/aay053
   Holbrook AL, 2003, PUBLIC OPIN QUART, V67, P79, DOI 10.1086/346010
   Jones AD, 2017, NUTR REV, V75, P769, DOI 10.1093/nutrit/nux040
   Kom Z, 2022, GEOJOURNAL, V87, P677, DOI 10.1007/s10708-020-10272-7
   Kumar Ranjit., 2010, RES METHODOLOGY STEP, V3rd
   Lindoso DP, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10030622
   Mabhaudhi T., 2019, 3 WORLD IRR FOR WIF3, P1
   Mabhaudhi T, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9091569
   Mahlobo B.T., 2016, Multi-criteria livestock assessment for sustainability of smallholder farms in Kwa-Zulu Natal
   Maseko I, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10010016
   Masih I, 2014, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V18, P3635, DOI 10.5194/hess-18-3635-2014
   McGee K, 2014, POLICY RES WORKING P
   McKune SL, 2015, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V6, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2015.05.001
   Mdungela A.J., 2015, FARMERS CHOICE DROUG
   Miller A., 2013, FOOD SYSTEM STRATEGI
   Miyan MA, 2015, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V7, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2014.06.003
   Morton JF, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P19680, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701855104
   Mthembu N.N, 2013, INVESTIGATION CHARAC
   Mulangu F., 2012, Working Paper no. 2012-011
   Municipality Msinga Local., 2015, DISAS MANAGE
   Murphy SP, 2003, J NUTR, V133, p3932S, DOI 10.1093/jn/133.11.3932S
   Myers SS, 2017, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V38, P259, DOI 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044356
   National Drought Mitigation Centre, 2018, TYP DROUGHT
   Ngcoya M, 2017, J AGRAR CHANGE, V17, P480, DOI 10.1111/joac.12170
   Niang I, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1199
   Nyamushamba GB, 2017, ASIAN AUSTRAL J ANIM, V30, P603, DOI 10.5713/ajas.16.0024
   Ochieng J, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0189022
   Ochieng J, 2016, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V77, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2016.03.005
   Orimoogunje O.O.I, 2017, HDB DROUGHT WATER SC, V2, DOI [10.1201/9781315226781-8, DOI 10.1201/9781315226781-8]
   Ortmand G.F, 2003, CHALLENGE CHANGE AGR, Vfirst
   Pandey S., 2007, EC COSTS DROUGHT RIC
   Payus C, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12041135
   Pelser A., 2001, South African Journal of Agricultural Extension, V30, P52
   Pillay S.E, 2016, IMPACT CHANGE CLIMAT
   Popkin BM, 2006, AM J CLIN NUTR, V84, P289, DOI 10.1093/ajcn/84.2.289
   Rajendran S., 2017, Agric Food Secur, V6, P50, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40066-017-0127-3
   Randolph TF, 2007, J ANIM SCI, V85, P2788, DOI 10.2527/jas.2007-0467
   Ravindranath M., 2005, Journal of Human Ecology, V18, P245
   Rey D, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P1527, DOI 10.1007/s10113-017-1116-6
   Richmond Municipality, 2015, MUN HIST MUN S AFR
   Scheelbeek PFD, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P6804, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1800442115
   Scholtz M. M., 2016, Applied Animal Husbandry & Rural Development, V9, P6
   Schulze R, 2011, PERSPECTIVE CLIMATE
   Shiferaw B, 2014, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V3, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2014.04.004
   Silva C, 2017, JSM NUTR DISORD, V1, P1
   Solh M, 2014, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V3, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2014.03.003
   South African Government, 2015, KWAZULU NAT PROL DRO
   South African Government, 2018, NW373 MUN S AFR
   Springmann M, 2016, LANCET, V387, P1937, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01156-3
   Stanke C., 2013, PLOS ONE, DOI [10.1371/currents. dis.7a2cee9-980f91ad7697b570bcc4b004, DOI 10.1371/CURRENTS.DIS.7A2CEE9-980F91AD7697B570BCC4B004]
   Statistics South Africa, 2013, CENS 2011 AGR HOUS K, P3
   Statistics South Africa, 2017, Poverty trends in South Africa: An examination of absolute poverty between 2006 and 2015
   Strauss E, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P2
   Sulla V., 2018, OVERCOMING POVERTY I, DOI DOI 10.1596/29614
   Tesfay SZ, 2016, HORTSCIENCE, V51, P1529, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI11161-16
   The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE HLTH, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60576-6, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60576-6]
   Tierney W.G, 2011, QUALITATIVE RES PUBL, DOI [10.1007/ 978-94-007-0702-3, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0702-3]
   Tilman D, 2014, NATURE, V515, P518, DOI 10.1038/nature13959
   Tongco M. D. C., 2007, Ethnobotany Research and Applications, V5, P147
   Tuomisto Hanna L, 2017, Wellcome Open Res, V2, P21, DOI 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.11190.2
   Twongyirwe R, 2019, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V24, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2019.100201
   Udmale P, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V10, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.09.011
   Upton M, 2004, ROLE LIVESTOCK EC DE
   Vermeulen SJ, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P8357, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1219441110
   Wamsler C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P86, DOI 10.1177/0956247813516061
   Wang X, 2014, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V349, DOI 10.1136/bmj.g4490
   Warner K, 2013, INT J GLOBAL WARM, V5, P367, DOI 10.1504/IJGW.2013.057289
   Westhoek H, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V26, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.004
   Wilhite D. A., 1985, Water International, V10, P111, DOI 10.1080/02508068508686328
   World Meteorological Organisation, 2016, WORLD METEOROLOGICAL
   Zhang ZY, 2016, FOOD NUTR BULL, V37, P303, DOI 10.1177/0379572116647823
   Ziervogel G, 2014, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V5, P605, DOI 10.1002/wcc.295
NR 114
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 7
U2 20
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0947
J9 WEATHER CLIM EXTREME
JI Weather Clim. Extremes
PD MAR
PY 2022
VL 35
AR 100413
DI 10.1016/j.wace.2022.100413
EA FEB 2022
PG 12
WC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA 0D6QD
UT WOS:000776116800003
PM 35251923
OA Green Accepted, Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Huber, N
   Bugmann, H
   Cailleret, M
   Bircher, N
   Lafond, V
AF Huber, Nica
   Bugmann, Harald
   Cailleret, Maxime
   Bircher, Nicolas
   Lafond, Valentine
TI Stand-scale climate change impacts on forests over large areas:
   transient responses and projection uncertainties
SO ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE adaption; dynamic vegetation model; ForClim; forest gap model; forest
   model; management; mountain forest; species composition; Switzerland;
   tipping point; uncertainty
ID SPECIES RANGE SHIFTS; TEMPERATE FORESTS; TREE MORTALITY; GAP MODEL;
   VEGETATION SHIFTS; MOUNTAIN FORESTS; FAGUS-SYLVATICA; SPRUCE FORESTS;
   CENTRAL-EUROPE; GLOBAL CHANGE
AB The increasing impacts of climate change on forest ecosystems have triggered multiple model-based impact assessments for the future, which typically focused either on a small number of stand-scale case studies or on large scale analyses (i.e., continental to global). Therefore, substantial uncertainty remains regarding the local impacts over large areas (i.e., regions to countries), which is particularly problematic for forest management. We provide a comprehensive, high-resolution assessment of the climate change sensitivity of managed Swiss forests (similar to 10,000 km(2)), which cover a wide range of environmental conditions. We used a dynamic vegetation model to project the development of typical forest stands derived from a stratification of the Third National Forest Inventory until the end of the 22nd century. Two types of simulations were conducted: one limited to using the extant local species, the other enabling immigration of potentially more climate-adapted species. Moreover, to assess the robustness of our projections, we quantified and decomposed the uncertainty in model projections resulting from the following sources: (1) climate change scenarios, (2) local site conditions, and (3) the dynamic vegetation model itself (i.e., represented by a set of model versions), an aspect hitherto rarely taken into account. The simulations showed substantial changes in basal area and species composition, with dissimilar sensitivity to climate change across and within elevation zones. Higher-elevation stands generally profited from increased temperature, but soil conditions strongly modulated this response. Low-elevation stands were increasingly subject to drought, with strong negative impacts on forest growth. Furthermore, current stand structure had a strong effect on the simulated response. The admixture of drought-tolerant species was found advisable across all elevations to mitigate future adverse climate-induced effects. The largest uncertainty in model projections was associated with climate change scenarios. Uncertainty induced by the model version was generally largest where overall simulated climate change impacts were small, thus corroborating the utility of the model for making projections into the future. Yet, the large influence of both site conditions and the model version on some of the projections indicates that uncertainty sources other than climate change scenarios need to be considered in climate change impact assessments.
C1 [Huber, Nica; Bugmann, Harald; Cailleret, Maxime; Bircher, Nicolas; Lafond, Valentine] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Terr Ecosyst, Dept Environm Syst Sci, Forest Ecol, Univ Str 16, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
   [Huber, Nica] Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, Remote Sensing, Zurcherstr 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
   [Cailleret, Maxime] Aix Marseille Univ, INRAE, UMR RECOVER, 3275 Route Cezanne,CS 40061, Aix En Provence 5, France.
   [Lafond, Valentine] Univ British Columbia, Forest Sci Ctr, Fac Forestry, Dept Forest Resources Management, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
C3 Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology Domain; ETH Zurich; Swiss Federal
   Institutes of Technology Domain; Swiss Federal Institute for Forest,
   Snow & Landscape Research; Aix-Marseille Universite; INRAE; University
   of British Columbia
RP Huber, N (corresponding author), Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Terr Ecosyst, Dept Environm Syst Sci, Forest Ecol, Univ Str 16, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.; Huber, N (corresponding author), Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, Remote Sensing, Zurcherstr 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
EM nica.huber@wsl.ch
RI Huber, Nica/AAP-1979-2021; Bugmann, Harald/A-1252-2008
OI Bugmann, Harald/0000-0003-4233-0094; Huber, Nica/0000-0001-5427-6836;
   Cailleret, Maxime/0000-0001-6561-1943
FU Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation SERI
   [C14.0046]; Swiss Federal Office for the Environment FOEN; Swiss
   National Science Foundation [140968]; Academy of Finland (AKA) [140968]
   Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
FX This work was partially funded by the Swiss State Secretariat for
   Education, Research and Innovation SERI (grant no. C14.0046) in the
   context of the COST Action PROFOUND, the Swiss Federal Office for the
   Environment FOEN in the context of the program "Forests and Climate
   Change," and by the Swiss National Science Foundation (project No.
   140968). We appreciate the support of Harald von Waldow (ETH Center for
   Climate Systems Modeling; C2SM) on the selection and appropriate use of
   climate change scenarios in the simulations as well as the support by
   the NFI team at WSL Birmensdorf, particularly by Markus Huber. We
   further thank Monika Frehner for providing expert input regarding best
   management practices and Andreas Rudow for his expertise when revising
   the speciesspecific parameters. We are grateful for the IT support by
   Dominic Michel and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
CR Alberdi Asensio I., 2015, FOREST EUROPE MIN C
   Allen CD, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P660, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001
   Ammer C, 2018, BASIC APPL ECOL, V32, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2018.07.006
   [Anonymous], 2016, KLIMADATEN WALDMODEL
   [Anonymous], 2010, Country Report
   [Anonymous], 1994, THESIS SWISS FEDERAL
   [Anonymous], 2011, SWISS CLIM CHANG SCE
   [Anonymous], 2009, EMSEMBLES CLIMATE CH
   Arbeiter F., 2011, ECOLOGICAL SILIVICUL
   Augusiak J, 2014, ECOL MODEL, V280, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.009
   Barros C, 2017, J APPL ECOL, V54, P39, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12742
   Baumbach L, 2019, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V19, P1159, DOI 10.1007/s10113-019-01472-0
   Bircher N., 2015, THESIS ETH ZURICH ZU
   Bircher N, 2015, ECOL APPL, V25, P1303, DOI 10.1890/14-1462.1
   Boisvenue C, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P862, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01134.x
   Bontemps JD, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P1455, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.019
   Brandli U.-B., 2010, SCHWEIZERISCHES LAND
   Brecka AFJ, 2018, FOREST POLICY ECON, V92, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.03.010
   Bürgi M, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V289, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.012
   Bugmann H, 1998, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V103, P247, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00217-X
   Bugmann H, 1997, CAN J FOREST RES, V27, P551, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-27-4-551
   Bugmann H, 2001, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V51, P259, DOI 10.1023/A:1012525626267
   Bugmann H, 2019, ECOSPHERE, V10, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2616
   Bugmann HKM, 1996, ECOLOGY, V77, P2055, DOI 10.2307/2265700
   Bugmann HKM, 2000, ECOL APPL, V10, P95, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0095:EFCABA]2.0.CO;2
   Bullock JM, 2000, ECOGRAPHY, V23, P257, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00281.x
   Büntgen U, 2006, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V20, P99, DOI 10.1007/s00468-005-0017-3
   Bürgi M, 2003, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V176, P173, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00270-0
   Busing R.T., 2005, Assessment of a model of forest dynamics under contrasting climate and disturbance regimes in the Pacific Northwest
   Cailleret M, 2011, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V25, P265, DOI 10.1007/s00468-010-0503-0
   Linares JC, 2009, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V18, P485, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00465.x
   Charru M, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V260, P864, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.005
   Charru M, 2014, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V28, P205, DOI 10.1007/s00468-013-0943-4
   Clark JS, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P2329, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13160
   Conedera M, 2004, VEG HIST ARCHAEOBOT, V13, P161, DOI 10.1007/s00334-004-0038-7
   Conedera M, 2010, ACTA HORTIC, V866, P297
   Conedera Marco, 2001, Forest Snow and Landscape Research, V76, P487
   De Cáceres M, 2015, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V213, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.06.012
   Didion M, 2009, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V258, pS44, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.006
   Elkin C, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P1827, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12156
   Engler R, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2330, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02393.x
   Etzold S, 2019, FRONT PLANT SCI, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2019.00307
   Fischer A.M., 2016, CH2011 EXTENSION SER
   Forrester DI, 2017, J ECOL, V105, P761, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12704
   Foster AC, 2016, ECOSYSTEMS, V19, P437, DOI 10.1007/s10021-015-9945-y
   Frehner M., 2005, NACHHALTIGKEIT ERFOL
   Fronzek S, 2019, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V19, P679, DOI 10.1007/s10113-018-1421-8
   Fyllas NM, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P1165, DOI 10.1007/s10113-016-1093-1
   Fyllas NM, 2009, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V18, P64, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00419.x
   Gauthier S, 2014, ENVIRON REV, V22, P256, DOI 10.1139/er-2013-0064
   Gonzalez P, 2010, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V19, P755, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00558.x
   Hanewinkel M, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P203, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1687, 10.1038/nclimate1687]
   Harsch MA, 2009, ECOL LETT, V12, P1040, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01355.x
   Hartl-Meier C, 2014, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V28, P819, DOI 10.1007/s00468-014-0994-1
   Henne PD, 2018, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V18, P205, DOI 10.1007/s10113-017-1182-9
   Henne PD, 2011, J BIOGEOGR, V38, P933, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02460.x
   Hickler T, 2012, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V21, P50, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00613.x
   Hirota M, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P232, DOI 10.1126/science.1210657
   Hlásny T, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V328, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.038
   Horemans JA, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V361, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.10.048
   Huber N, 2019, THESIS ETH ZURICH ZU
   Huber N, 2020, ECOSPHERE, V11, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.3109
   Huber N, 2018, ECOL MODEL, V368, P377, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.12.013
   Hülsmann L, 2018, ECOL APPL, V28, P522, DOI 10.1002/eap.1668
   IPCC, 2019, IN PRESS
   Isler J., 2019, THESIS ETH ZURICH ZU
   Ito A, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7a19
   Iverson LR, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P879, DOI 10.1007/s10980-013-9885-x
   Janda P, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V435, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.12.045
   Jochner M, 2018, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V32, P645, DOI 10.1007/s00468-017-1648-x
   Johnstone JF, 2010, ECOSPHERE, V1, DOI 10.1890/ES10-00102.1
   Kalliokoski T, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V262, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.06.030
   Keller M., 2011, MANUAL FIELD SURVEY
   Knüsel S, 2017, BIOL INVASIONS, V19, P455, DOI 10.1007/s10530-016-1301-4
   Knutti R, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P369, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1716, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1716]
   Larocque G R., 2016, Ecological Forest Management Handbook
   Lasch P, 2002, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V162, P73, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00051-8
   Lehner F, 2020, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V11, P491, DOI 10.5194/esd-11-491-2020
   Lenoir, 2013, Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, P599, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-384719-5.00375-0, 10.1016/b978-0-12-384719-5.00375-0]
   Lenoir J, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P1768, DOI 10.1126/science.1156831
   Lexer MJ, 2002, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V162, P53, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00050-6
   Lindner M, 1997, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V95, P183, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03967-9
   Lindner M, 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V146, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.030
   Lindner M, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P698, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.023
   Manusch C, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P1437, DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0586-z
   Maroschek M, 2015, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V15, P1543, DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0691-z
   Martin-Benito D, 2018, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V27, P1314, DOI 10.1111/geb.12799
   Mather JR., 1957, INSTRUCTIONS TABLES
   Mathys AS, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P920, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13440
   Matott LS, 2009, WATER RESOUR RES, V45, DOI 10.1029/2008WR007301
   McCabe GJ, 2009, EARTH INTERACT, V13, DOI 10.1175/2009EI283.1
   Mette T, 2013, ECOSPHERE, V4, DOI 10.1890/ES13-00115.1
   Millar CI, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P2145, DOI 10.1890/06-1715.1
   Mina M, 2017, J APPL ECOL, V54, P389, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12772
   Mina M, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P49, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0902-2
   MOORE AD, 1989, ECOL MODEL, V45, P63, DOI 10.1016/0304-3800(89)90100-2
   Morin X, 2008, J ECOL, V96, P784, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01369.x
   Morin X, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-23763-y
   Nishina K, 2015, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V6, P435, DOI 10.5194/esd-6-435-2015
   Ogle K, 2015, ECOL LETT, V18, P221, DOI 10.1111/ele.12399
   Peng CH, 2011, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V1, P467, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1293
   Peñuelas J, 2003, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V9, P131, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00566.x
   Peñuelas J, 2007, ECOGRAPHY, V30, P829, DOI 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05247.x
   Pinheiro J, 2018, LINEAR NONLINEAR MIX, P1
   Pournelle G. H., 1953, Journal of Mammalogy, V34, P133
   Pretzsch H, 2014, NAT COMMUN, V5, DOI 10.1038/ncomms5967
   Pretzsch H, 2009, FOREST DYNAMICS, GROWTH AND YIELD: FROM MEASUREMENT TO MODEL, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-88307-4_1
   Rasche L, 2012, ECOL MODEL, V232, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.03.004
   Rasche L, 2011, J APPL ECOL, V48, P1174, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02014.x
   Reyer C, 2014, ANN FOREST SCI, V71, P211, DOI 10.1007/s13595-013-0306-8
   Reyer CPO, 2016, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V137, P395, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1694-1
   Reyer CPO, 2015, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V15, P1483, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0861-7
   Rigling A., 2015, Forest Report 2015: Condition and Use of Swiss Forests
   Rigling A, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P229, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12038
   Risch AC, 2005, ECOL MODEL, V181, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.06.029
   Robin Cecile, 2001, Forest Snow and Landscape Research, V76, P361
   Ruiz-Benito P, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056843
   Sallé A, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V328, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.027
   Scheffer M, 2003, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V18, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.002
   Schelhaas MJ, 2015, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V15, P1581, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0788-z
   Schröter D, 2005, SCIENCE, V310, P1333, DOI 10.1126/science.1115233
   Schuetzenmeister A., 2018, Variance component analysis
   Schuler LJ, 2019, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V34, P1279, DOI 10.1007/s10980-019-00838-3
   Schwörer C, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P1512, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12456
   Seidl R, 2005, TREE PHYSIOL, V25, P939, DOI 10.1093/treephys/25.7.939
   Seidl R, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P395, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3303, 10.1038/nclimate3303]
   Seidl R, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V388, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.11.030
   Senf C, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-07539-6
   Shugart HH, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaaacc
   Shuman JK, 2014, ECOL MODEL, V293, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.10.028
   Snell RS, 2014, ECOGRAPHY, V37, P1184, DOI 10.1111/ecog.00580
   Snell RS, 2018, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V18, P2145, DOI 10.1007/s10113-018-1337-3
   SOLOMON AM, 1986, OECOLOGIA, V68, P567, DOI 10.1007/BF00378773
   Takolander A, 2019, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V19, P251, DOI 10.1007/s10113-018-1403-x
   Telesca L, 2010, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V10, P723, DOI 10.5194/nhess-10-723-2010
   Temperli C, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1337, DOI 10.1007/s10980-013-9882-0
   Temperli C, 2012, ECOL APPL, V22, P2065, DOI 10.1890/12-0210.1
   Thom D, 2017, ECOL MONOGR, V87, P665, DOI 10.1002/ecm.1272
   Thom D, 2017, J APPL ECOL, V54, P28, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12644
   Thrippleton T, 2020, EUR J FOREST RES, V139, P483, DOI 10.1007/s10342-020-01263-x
   Thrippleton T, 2020, ECOSYSTEMS, V23, P188, DOI 10.1007/s10021-019-00397-3
   van der Maaten-Theunissen M, 2013, ANN FOREST SCI, V70, P185, DOI 10.1007/s13595-012-0241-0
   Vannini Andrea, 2001, Forest Snow and Landscape Research, V76, P345
   Vanoni M, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V382, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.10.001
   Walther GR, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P2019, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0021
   Walther GR, 2004, PERSPECT PLANT ECOL, V6, P169, DOI 10.1078/1433-8319-00076
   Walther GR, 2002, NATURE, V416, P389, DOI 10.1038/416389a
   Walthert L, 2017, ECOL EVOL, V7, P9473, DOI 10.1002/ece3.3436
   Wehrli A, 2005, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V205, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.043
   Wermelinger B., 2015, CH2014 IMPACTS QUANT
   Wohlgemuth T., 2018, Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen, V169, P279, DOI 10.3188/szf.2018.0279
   Wu ZD, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa6fd8
   Xiao JT, 2017, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V32, P1347, DOI 10.1007/s10980-016-0442-2
   Zubler EM, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V125, P237, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1144-x
NR 154
TC 22
Z9 22
U1 2
U2 25
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1051-0761
EI 1939-5582
J9 ECOL APPL
JI Ecol. Appl.
PD JUN
PY 2021
VL 31
IS 4
AR e02313
DI 10.1002/eap.2313
EA MAY 2021
PG 19
WC Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA SK9KQ
UT WOS:000647223300001
PM 33630399
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Huang, L
   Zhang, YX
   Chao, QC
   Yuan, JS
   Hu, T
AF Huang, Lei
   Zhang, Yongxiang
   Chao, Qingchen
   Yuan, Jiashuang
   Hu, Ting
TI Suggestions on China's capacity building in response to climate change
   in the "post-Paris" era
SO CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN-CHINESE
LA Chinese
DT Article
DE the post-Paris era; climate change; climate governance; capacity
   building
AB Climate change presents an important environmental challenge that is being addressed by the global community. The socio-economic efforts to address climate change involve both international and domestic economic transformation, industrial upgrading, infrastructure protection, and disaster prevention and mitigation, amongst other considerations. In particular, capacity-building is a prerequisite for both participating in global climate governance and for targeting domestic response measures. After the Paris Agreement, global climate governance has entered the new so-called "post-Paris" era. Changes to the United States' global climate policy have exacerbated the complexity of global climate governance, but domestic actions by stakeholders at the national or sub-national level are still striving toward the goals agreed to in the Paris Agreement. In particular, China faces significant challenges in addressing climate change impacts in both global mitigation efforts and domestic adaptation needs. Here, we identify areas shortcoming in capacity building for China that are targeted for improvement in the "post-Paris" era. Firstly, advances in the basic scientific research capacity of China to study climate change should focus on climate change detection attribution, prediction and impact assessment. One specific approach includes the development of climate system models along with the improvement of the comprehensive climate observation system should be implemented to improve fundamental research on climate related topics. Secondly, it is necessary to further enhance China's climate adaptation capacity, particularly targeting adaptation goals for agriculture and urbanized areas as well as improving risk assessment and management of for already-occurring disasters. Thirdly, the development of a comprehensive understanding and support system for policy makers that can be used to integrate climate change responses into China's international and domestic policies is critical for formulating effective mitigation and adaptation efforts. Fourthly, efforts should also be taken in building and enhancing a clear legal system that addresses emerging challenges in mitigation and adaptation. To address many of the above challenges, improvements and expansions also need to be made to strengthen the national expertise in relevant professional fields of climate change, so as to effectively support the pertinence, specialization, refinement, and aptitude in developing strategies for the many climate change-related challenges facing China. Lastly, enhancements in public outreach, awareness and education on climate change will help the public to consciously practice many of the capacity-building efforts being developed, including adopting the concept of green and low carbon in their daily life.
C1 [Huang, Lei; Zhang, Yongxiang; Chao, Qingchen; Hu, Ting] China Meteorol Adm, Natl Climate Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
   [Yuan, Jiashuang] China Meteorol Adm, Dept Sci & Technol & Climate Change, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
C3 China Meteorological Administration; China Meteorological Administration
RP Zhang, YX (corresponding author), China Meteorol Adm, Natl Climate Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
EM helen.zyx@hotmail.com
RI Zhang, Yongxiang/AAS-7574-2020; Hu, Ting/AAH-1732-2019; huang,
   lei/GQP-8739-2022
OI Hu, Ting/0000-0003-4177-7011
CR [Anonymous], 2017, J BIOMED INFORM, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICVRV.2017.00025
   [Anonymous], 2014, STATE TRENDS CARBON
   Chao Q. - C., 2016, QIHOU BIANHUA YANJIU, V12, P61
   Chao Q C, 2014, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V10, P163
   CHEMI T, 2017, ELECT POWER, P1
   [陈晓晨 Chen Xiaochen], 2015, [大气科学, Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences], V39, P1123
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   [傅莎 Fu Sha], 2017, [气候变化研究进展, Progressus Inquisitiones de Mutatione Climatis], V13, P415
   Gao X, 2016, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V12, P83
   Gao Y, 2019, SCI BULL, V64, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2019.01.013
   Ghista DN, 2016, CARDIOLOGY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, P47
   Han J, 2018, J ANAL APPL PYROL, V129, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jaap.2017.12.016
   He J., 2018, CHIN J ENV MANAG, V10, P9, DOI 10.16868/j.cnki.1674-6252.2018.01.009
   [何建坤 He Jiankun], 2016, [科学通报, Chinese Science Bulletin], V61, P1055
   李婧华, 2014, [气候变化研究进展, Progressus Inquisitiones de Mutatione Climatis], V10, P355
   Meckling J, 2017, NAT ENERGY, V2, P918, DOI 10.1038/s41560-017-0025-8
   Mo J., 2018, EC RES J, V53, P168, DOI [DOI 10.16529/J.CNKI.11-4613/F.2020.10.007, 10.16529/j.cnki.11-4613/f.2020.10.007]
   National Climate Change Center China Meteorological Administration, 2019, CHIN BLUE BOOK CLIM
   Song Y M, 2018, J INT RELAT, P137
   吴灿, 2014, [气候变化研究进展, Progressus Inquisitiones de Mutatione Climatis], V10, P65
   [曾文革 Zeng Wenge], 2017, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V27, P112
   [张海滨 Zhang Haibin], 2017, [气候变化研究进展, Progressus Inquisitiones de Mutatione Climatis], V13, P439
   Zhang YX, 2017, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V8, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2017.08.005
   [张永香 Zhang Yongxiang], 2018, [科学通报, Chinese Science Bulletin], V63, P2313
   [张永香 Zhang Yongxiang], 2017, [气候变化研究进展, Progressus Inquisitiones de Mutatione Climatis], V13, P292
   Zhang ZQ, 2019, ENV PROT, P15
   郑秋红, 2014, [气候变化研究进展, Progressus Inquisitiones de Mutatione Climatis], V10, P208
NR 27
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 1
U2 26
PU SCIENCE PRESS
PI EPHRATA
PA 300 WEST CHESNUT ST, EPHRATA, PA 17522 USA
SN 0023-074X
EI 2095-9419
J9 CHIN SCI B-CHIN
JI Chin. Sci. Bull.-Chin.
PY 2020
VL 65
IS 5
BP 373
EP 379
DI 10.1360/TB-2019-0266
PG 7
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA MH8CH
UT WOS:000546949500008
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Viherä-Aarnio, A
   Kostiainen, K
   Piispanen, R
   Saranpää, P
   Vapaavuori, E
AF Vihera-Aarnio, Anneli
   Kostiainen, Katri
   Piispanen, Riikka
   Saranpaa, Pekka
   Vapaavuori, Elina
TI Effects of seed transfers on yield and stem defects of silver birch
   (<i>Betula</i> <i>pendula</i> Roth)
SO FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Betula pendula; Climatic adaptation; Provenance; Growth; Stem quality
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; FREEZING TOLERANCE; CARBON ALLOCATION; WOODY-PLANTS;
   GROWTH; TEMPERATURE; RESPONSES; OZONE; ECOTYPES; ORIGIN
AB We studied the effect of seed transfers on survival, yield and stem defects of silver birch (Betula pendula Roth) of North European origin in five parallel provenance trials in Finland. The trials were located at Loppi (60 degrees 39'N) in southern Finland, at Kannonkoski (62 degrees 58'N), Ilomantsi (62 degrees 58'N) and Toholampi (63 degrees 47'N) in central Finland and at Rovaniemi (66 degrees 21'N) in northern Finland. Four trials were growing on moist upland forest sites and one on agricultural land. The material consisted of altogether 38 stand seed origins from Finland, Sweden, Estonia, Great Britain and Russia ranging between latitudes 53 degrees and 67 degrees N. Survival, height, diameter at breast height, stem volume/ha and number of stem defects per tree were assessed when the trees were 19 years old. Seed transfer distance was calculated either as latitudinal or temperature sum difference between the seed origin and the trial location. According to coefficients of determination (R-2), the latitude-based transfer models gave a slightly better fit with the data than the models based on temperature sum differences. Significant differences were found among the origins regarding all studied traits in all trials. In all traits, the pattern of variation in relation to the transfer distance was curvilinear, and the effect of transfer distance was significant A long transfer from both directions led to a reduction in all measured traits. The optimal transfer distance and direction varied depending on the trait and covariate used in the models. According to the latitudinal model, local or slightly more northern origins had highest survival and lowest number of stem defects. Height growth and yield was at highest with the local or slightly more southern origins. A northward transfer of ca. 2 degrees of latitude increased yield, while a southward transfer or a longer northward transfer, decreased the yield. According to the temperature sum model, origins within the limits of approximately +/- 200 d.d. compared to the trial location produced the highest yield. Origins with similar or slightly lower temperature sums compared to the trial locations had highest survival and best stem quality. The current seed transfer guidelines for silver birch in Finland, which recommend transfer distances of 150 km or 150 d.d. at maximum in southward or northward direction, seem still valid. Because of the low gain in expected yield by even moderate northward transfers and the uncertainties in the success of more southern origins in varying future climate, we recommend no changes in seed transfer guidelines. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Vihera-Aarnio, Anneli; Piispanen, Riikka; Saranpaa, Pekka] Finnish Forest Res Inst, Vantaa Unit, FI-01301 Vantaa, Finland.
   [Kostiainen, Katri; Vapaavuori, Elina] Finnish Forest Res Inst, Suonenjoki Unit, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland.
C3 Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke); Natural Resources Institute
   Finland (Luke)
RP Viherä-Aarnio, A (corresponding author), Finnish Forest Res Inst, Vantaa Unit, POB 18, FI-01301 Vantaa, Finland.
EM anneli.vihera-aarnio@metla.fi; katri.kostiainen@metla.fi;
   riikka.piispanen@metla.fi; pekka.saranpaa@metla.fi;
   elina.vapaavuori@metla.fi
RI Saranpaa, Pekka/C-2114-2008
OI Saranpaa, Pekka/0000-0002-1129-2315; Kostiainen,
   Katri/0000-0001-6223-5110
FU Academy of Finland [640060, 640077]
FX The Finnish Forest and Park Service is acknowledged for cooperation in
   establishing the field trials, for raising the seedlings and for
   providing the experimental sites. Taisto Jaakola, Erkki Kosonen, Heimo
   Tynkkynen and Jouni Unga carried out the field measurements. Torny Axell
   in the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, and Ivo
   Saaremae and Valeria Galushkina in the Estonian Meteorogical and
   Hydrological Institute provided us with the temperature data from Sweden
   and Estonia. Risto Hakkinen and Jaakko Heinonen gave us valuable advice
   in the statistical analysis. Sari Elomaa drew the figures. We wish to
   thank them all for help and co-operation. We are also grateful to Ivar
   Etverk, late Lars-Arvid Vikinge and Ian Brodie who provided us with the
   seed material from Estonia, Sweden and Scotland in the late 1980's. The
   study was partly funded by Academy of Finland (projects 640060 to E.V.
   and 640077 to K.K.).
CR Ahtikoski A., 2000, THESIS U HELSINKI
   [Anonymous], 1996, FINNISH RES PROGRAMM
   [Anonymous], PASW STAT 17 0 COMM
   [Anonymous], METS KEH TAP
   [Anonymous], 1949, ACTA FOR FENN
   [Anonymous], FINNISH ENV I MIMEOG
   Black-Samuelsson S., 2002, Forest Genetics, V9, P71
   Briceño-Elizondo E, 2006, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V232, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.062
   Eriksson G., 1986, SCAND J FOREST RES, V1, P412
   Haapanen M., 2008, WORKING PAPERS FINNI, V71
   HABJORG A, 1972, Meldinger fra Norges Landbrukshogskole, V51, P1
   HABJORG A, 1978, MELD NORG LANDBRUKS, V57, P2
   Hagqvist R., 1991, YB 1991, P12
   Heiskanen V., 1966, Acta Forestalia Fennica, V80, P128
   Hynynen J, 2010, FORESTRY, V83, P103, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpp035
   Johnsson H., 1977, FORENINGEN SKOGSTRAD, P48
   JONSELL B, 2000, FLORA NORDICA, V1, P1
   JUNTTILA O, 1993, NATO ADV SCI INST SE, V244, P43
   Jylha K., 2009, FINNISH METEOROLOGIC, P102
   Karkkainen M., 1986, Silva Fennica, V20, P45
   Kasurinen A, 2012, TREE PHYSIOL, V32, P737, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tps005
   Kleinschmit J., 1982, Forst- und Holzwirt, V37, P257
   Koski V., 1977, COMMUNICATIONES I FO, V90, P1
   Laasasenaho J., 1982, Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae
   Li CY, 2003, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V17, P127, DOI 10.1007/s00468-002-0214-2
   Li CY, 2002, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V116, P478, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1160406.x
   Linkosalo T, 2009, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V149, P453, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.09.006
   Mäenpää M, 2011, TREE PHYSIOL, V31, P808, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpr075
   Marttila V., 2005, PUBLICATIONS MINISTR, V1/2005, P276
   NITSCH J. P., 1957, PROC AMER SOC HORT SCI, V70, P526
   RAULO J, 1978, Silva Fennica, V12, P17
   RAULO J, 1976, COMMUN I FOREST FENN, V88, P1
   RAULO J, 1979, COMMUN I FOREST FENN, V97, P1
   Rehfeldt GE, 1999, ECOL MONOGR, V69, P375, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0375:GRTCIP]2.0.CO;2
   Rehfeldt GE, 2002, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V8, P912, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00516.x
   Riikonen J, 2004, TREE PHYSIOL, V24, P1227, DOI 10.1093/treephys/24.11.1227
   SHARIK TL, 1976, CAN J BOT, V54, P2122, DOI 10.1139/b76-228
   Solantie R., 2004, BOREAL ENVIRON RES, V9, P319
   Stener L.-G., 1995, SKOGFORSK REDOGORELS, V1, P1
   Stener L-G., 1997, SKOGFORSK REDOGORELS, V3, P1
   Sutinen R, 2002, CAN J FOREST RES, V32, P1158, DOI [10.1139/x02-076, 10.1139/X02-076]
   Tanino KK, 2010, PLANT MOL BIOL, V73, P49, DOI 10.1007/s11103-010-9610-y
   Taylor G, 2008, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V14, P264, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01473.x
   Tietäväinen H, 2010, INT J CLIMATOL, V30, P2247, DOI 10.1002/joc.2046
   Velling P., 1979, FOLIA FORESTALIA, V379, P1
   Venalainen A., 2005, FINN METEOROL I REP, V5, P1
   Viherä-Aarnio A, 2005, TREE PHYSIOL, V25, P101, DOI 10.1093/treephys/25.1.101
   Viherä-Aarnio A, 2008, SILVA FENN, V42, P735, DOI 10.14214/sf.226
   Viherä-Aarnio A, 2006, TREE PHYSIOL, V26, P1013, DOI 10.1093/treephys/26.8.1013
   Viherä-Aarnio A, 2006, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V229, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.011
   WAREING PF, 1956, ANNU REV PLANT PHYS, V7, P191, DOI 10.1146/annurev.pp.07.060156.001203
   Way DA, 2010, TREE PHYSIOL, V30, P669, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpq015
   WEISER CJ, 1970, SCIENCE, V169, P1269, DOI 10.1126/science.169.3952.1269
   White T. L., 2007, Forest Genetics
NR 54
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 1
U2 16
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
PI AMSTERDAM
PA PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0378-1127
J9 FOREST ECOL MANAG
JI For. Ecol. Manage.
PD FEB 1
PY 2013
VL 289
BP 133
EP 142
DI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.030
PG 10
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA 099XP
UT WOS:000315659500016
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Kinyua, MW
   Kihara, J
   Bekunda, M
   Bolo, P
   Mairura, FS
   Fischer, G
   Mucheru-Muna, MW
AF Kinyua, M. W.
   Kihara, J.
   Bekunda, M.
   Bolo, P.
   Mairura, F. S.
   Fischer, G.
   Mucheru-Muna, M. W.
TI Agronomic and economic performance of legume-legume and cereal-legume
   intercropping systems in Northern Tanzania
SO AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Mbili-Mbili; Cropping systems; Competition; Gender; Economics;
   Doubled-up legume
ID BIOLOGICAL NITROGEN-FIXATION; CROPPING SYSTEMS; MAIZE; YIELD; SOIL;
   PRODUCTIVITY; ADAPTATION; ATTRIBUTES; SOUTHERN; AFRICA
AB CONTEXT: Cereal-legume intercropping, a common practice among farmers in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), is important for crop diversification, soil fertility improvement, household nutrition and climate adaptation. However, cereals often outcompete the intercropped legumes for growth resources resulting in low legume yields.OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were: i) assessing the effects of different intercropping options (crop spatial configurations) and maize crop (Zea mays L.) management innovations on productivity and economic benefits to farmers and ii) examining how farmers adapt new intercropping technologies to meet their household food security needs.METHODS: The study was undertaken in six on-farm researcher-designed and managed trials in high and low rainfall agro-ecological zones of Babati District in Tanzania, during four cropping seasons (2018-2021). The cropping systems tested included a sole maize system rotated with a legume-legume intercrop (Doubled-up legume), an innovation involving two maize rows intercropped with two legume species (Mbili-Mbili), maize -legume intercrop both with and without de-topping, maize-legume intercrop (2 maize plants at 50 cm intra-space, de-topped), maize-legume system (maize with vertical leaf architecture) and a farmer practice. The Mbili-Mbili technology adaptation assessment was conducted on 225 farmers during the 2021 cropping season. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Overall, maize grain yields increased by up to 56% in improved compared to farmer intercropping practices (P <= 0.05). There were no significant differences in maize grain yield among the improved practices. Significantly higher pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) yields of between 71% and 113% in 2020 and between 65% and 140% in 2021 were observed under Doubled-up legume and between 63% and 124% under local farmer practices in 2020 than in the improved cereal-legume practices. Across the study period, net rev-enues of sole maize and Doubled-up legume rotations were both the highest and lowest relative to other intercropping options, depending on the starting phase (US$ 653 sole maize and US$ 326 legume phase starting). These were also associated with the highest variances indicating instability. Mbili-Mbili intercropping system had not only high net revenue i.e., a mean of US$623 per hectare, but also more stable. Farmers perceived that Mbili-Mbili increased food security and 96% were willing to implement the system without project support.SIGNIFICANCE: Mbili-Mbili is recommended for adoption by farmers because of its potential economic benefits, food security and resilience in the current unpredictable weather and climate patterns.
C1 [Kinyua, M. W.; Kihara, J.; Bolo, P.] Alliance Biovers, ICIPE Duduville Complex,Off Kasarani Rd,POB 823-00, Nairobi 00621, Kenya.
   [Kinyua, M. W.; Kihara, J.; Bolo, P.] Int Ctr Trop Agr, ICIPE Duduville Complex,Off Kasarani Rd,POB 823-0, Nairobi 00621, Kenya.
   [Kinyua, M. W.; Bolo, P.; Mucheru-Muna, M. W.] Kenyatta Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Educ, POB 43844-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
   [Mairura, F. S.] Univ Embu, POB 6, Embu 60100, Kenya.
   [Bekunda, M.; Fischer, G.] Int Inst Trop Agr, POB 10, Duluti, Arusha, Tanzania.
C3 International Centre of Insect Physiology & Ecology (ICIPE);
   International Centre of Insect Physiology & Ecology (ICIPE); Kenyatta
   University
RP Kinyua, MW (corresponding author), Alliance Biovers, ICIPE Duduville Complex,Off Kasarani Rd,POB 823-00, Nairobi 00621, Kenya.; Kinyua, MW (corresponding author), Int Ctr Trop Agr, ICIPE Duduville Complex,Off Kasarani Rd,POB 823-0, Nairobi 00621, Kenya.
EM m.kinyua@cgiar.org
FU USAIDs' Africa Research in Sustainable Intensification for the Next
   Generation (Africa RISING) Program
FX We acknowledge the financial support provided through the USAIDs' Africa
   Research in Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation (Africa
   RISING) Program. We further acknowledge the implementing staff at the
   Ministry of Agriculture, Babati namely, Jonas Julius Masamu, Madam
   Jetrida Kyekaka, Rose Parangjo, Edgar, together with their colleagues at
   the village and wards including Judith Manzi, Adelta Macha, Ezekiel
   Mgumi, David Laswai, Boniventus Mtui, Everline Kaaya, Eldar Mmari, Rahab
   Karemba and Jackson Mbwambo who all played facilitative role and
   coordination of activities with farmers. We also acknowledge the
   technical support provided by Inot Songoyani and our drivers Peter Kiilo
   and Venance Kengwa. The work was conducted within the framework of Water
   Land and Ecosystems CGIAR research portfolio (WLE-CRP) . Within the One
   CGIAR, the work is aligned to Sustainable Intensification Mixed Farming
   Systems (SI-MFS) and the Excellence in Agronomy (EIA) Initiatives.
CR Adu-Gyamfi JJ, 2007, PLANT SOIL, V295, P127, DOI 10.1007/s11104-007-9270-0
   Altieri MA., 2018, AGROECOLOGY, P233
   Anders EJ, 2020, AGR SYST, V184, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102879
   Aref F, 2011, LIFE SCI J, V8, P26
   AUDA-NEPAD, 2019, MECH AGR TRANSF
   Bowles TM, 2020, ONE EARTH, V2, P284, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.007
   Chikowo R, 2020, ROLE OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, P171, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-816436-5.00009-3
   Chitsike C., 2017, QUALITATIVE EVALUATI, P69
   Dahlin AS, 2019, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V39, DOI 10.1007/s13593-019-0575-1
   DAVIS JHC, 1993, FIELD CROP RES, V34, P407, DOI 10.1016/0378-4290(93)90124-6
   Fanadzo M, 2010, WATER SA, V36, P27
   Fischer G, 2017, EUR J HORTIC SCI, V82, P319, DOI 10.17660/eJHS.2017/82.6.7
   Fischer G, 2021, INT J AGR SUSTAIN, V19, P403, DOI 10.1080/14735903.2020.1791425
   Girardin P., 1992, European Journal of Agronomy, V1, P91, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(14)80006-3
   Hoeschle-Zeledon I., 2019, AFRICA RES SUSTAINAB, P112
   John I, 2021, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V320, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107585
   Kanton R.A.L., 2008, W AFR J APP ECOL, V13, P55
   Kanyamuka J.S., 2017, ADOPTION INTEGRATED
   Kassie M, 2014, FOOD SECUR, V6, P217, DOI 10.1007/s12571-014-0332-x
   Kihara J, 2020, African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, V20, P17095, DOI 10.1867/ajfand.95.17965
   Kihara J, 2015, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V102, P5, DOI 10.1007/s10705-014-9648-3
   Kimaro AA, 2009, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V134, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2009.06.002
   Kinyua M., 2021, GEODERMA, V7
   Laizer HC, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11154076
   Li CY, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008049
   Li CJ, 2020, EUR J AGRON, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2019.125987
   Lithourgidis AS, 2011, EUR J AGRON, V34, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2011.02.007
   Madembo C, 2020, AGR SYST, V185, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102921
   Makate C, 2016, SPRINGERPLUS, V5, DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-2802-4
   Man~gaser T.V., 2013, INT SCI RES J, V3, P1094
   Mashingaidze A.B., 2010, JKUAT ANN SCI C P, P761
   Mashingaidze A.B., 2012, SCI C P, P820
   Matusso J. M. M., 2013, Journal of Cereals and Oilseeds, V4, P48
   Mbanyele V, 2021, FIELD CROP RES, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108218
   MEHLICH A, 1984, COMMUN SOIL SCI PLAN, V15, P1409, DOI 10.1080/00103628409367568
   Mponela P., 2022, SYST PRACT ACT RES, P1
   Mrema GC, 2018, AMA-AGR MECH ASIA AF, V49, P13
   Mucheru-Muna M, 2010, FIELD CROP RES, V115, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.013
   Mugi-Ngenga E, 2022, FIELD CROP RES, V287, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108656
   Mugi-Ngenga E, 2021, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V120, P177, DOI 10.1007/s10705-021-10144-7
   Mwila M., 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, P1
   Myaka FM, 2006, PLANT SOIL, V285, P207, DOI 10.1007/s11104-006-9006-6
   Nandwa SM, 1998, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V71, P5, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(98)00128-5
   Ngetich KF, 2014, CATENA, V121, P288, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2014.05.026
   Njira KOW, 2021, AGROFOREST SYST, V95, P279, DOI 10.1007/s10457-020-00589-0
   O'Leary N, 2004, J SUSTAIN AGR, V24, P109, DOI 10.1300/J064v24n03_08
   O'Leary N., 1999, American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, V14, P158, DOI 10.1017/S0889189300008328
   Ogutu M. O., 2012, Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, V3, P154, DOI 10.5251/abjna.2012.3.4.154.168
   Pandey A, 2017, EUR J AGRON, V90, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2017.07.009
   Phiri A.T., 2012, J AGR EXTENS RURAL D, V4, P340
   Rajkumara S., 2020, Agricultural Reviews, V41, P175, DOI 10.18805/ag.R-1953
   Schuler J, 2016, AGROECOL SUST FOOD, V40, P988, DOI 10.1080/21683565.2016.1221018
   Smith A, 2016, AGR SYST, V145, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.03.008
   Snapp SS, 2015, FOOD SECUR, V7, P83, DOI 10.1007/s12571-014-0410-0
   Tang XY, 2021, PLANT SOIL, V460, P89, DOI 10.1007/s11104-020-04768-x
   Tariq M, 2019, AGRONOMIC CROPS, VOL 1: PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, P545, DOI 10.1007/978-981-32-9151-5_24
   Thuita M.N., 2011, INNOVATIONS KEY GREE, P1023
   Vagen T., 2010, AfSIS Technical Specifications: Soil Health Surveillance
   Venance S.K., 2016, J EC SUSTAIN DEV, V7, P2222
   WAHUA TAT, 1981, EXP AGR, V17, P407, DOI 10.1017/S001447970001187X
   Waldman KB, 2016, FOOD SECUR, V8, P1087, DOI 10.1007/s12571-016-0616-4
   Woomer P.L., 2004, W AFR J APP ECOL, V6
   Woomer PL, 2007, ADVANCES IN INTEGRATED SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES, P881, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-5760-1_84
   Zhang W, 2021, INT J AGR SUSTAIN, V19, P269, DOI 10.1080/14735903.2021.1906575
NR 64
TC 11
Z9 11
U1 7
U2 22
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0308-521X
EI 1873-2267
J9 AGR SYST
JI Agric. Syst.
PD FEB
PY 2023
VL 205
AR 103589
DI 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103589
EA DEC 2022
PG 13
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA E4BP6
UT WOS:000975015800001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Ganina, MD
   Tyurin, MV
   Zhumatayeva, UT
   Lednev, GR
   Morozov, SV
   Kryukov, VY
AF Ganina, Mariya D.
   Tyurin, Maksim V.
   Zhumatayeva, Ulzhalgas T.
   Lednev, Georgy R.
   Morozov, Sergey V.
   Kryukov, Vadim Yu.
TI Comparative Analysis of Epicuticular Lipids in <i>Locusta migratoria</i>
   and <i>Calliptamus italicus</i>: A Possible Role in Susceptibility to
   Entomopathogenic Fungi
SO INSECTS
LA English
DT Article
DE alkanes; insect cuticle; climatic adaptations; mycoses; Metarhizium
ID INSECT CUTICULAR HYDROCARBONS; GREGARIA FORSKAL ACRIDIDAE; COLORADO
   POTATO BEETLE; BEAUVERIA-BASSIANA; WATER-BALANCE; SCHISTOCERCA; HOST;
   ATTACHMENT; CUTICLE; WAX
AB Simple Summary The surface lipids of insects protect them from desiccation and may modulate susceptibility to fungal infections. We conducted a comparative analysis of cuticular lipids of the migratory locust and Italian locust. The former inhabits relatively wet landscapes and the latter more arid ones. We analyzed cuticular lipids of these species by gas chromatography with mass spectrometry and found that the Italian locust has a hydrocarbon profile shifted toward long chains as well as a higher content of di- and trimethyl branched hydrocarbons, which is most likely an adaptation to the arid climate and strong temperature fluctuations in its habitats. Meanwhile, the surface of the Italian locust proved to be more hospitable for fungi. The number of Metarhizium conidia attached to the Italian locust cuticle was three-fold greater as compared to the migratory locust. Mortality due to the fungal infection was faster in the Italian locust under laboratory conditions. We propose that species inhabiting arid landscapes rarely encounter fungal pathogens and primarily deal with the problem of desiccation. Therefore, they can afford a cuticle that is hospitable to fungal pathogens. Cuticular lipids protect insects from desiccation and may determine resistance to fungal pathogens. Nonetheless, the trade-off between these lipid functions is still poorly understood. The migratory locust Locusta migratoria and the Italian locust Calliptamus italicus have dissimilar hygrothermal preferences: L. migratoria inhabits areas near water bodies with a reed bed, and C. italicus exploits a wide range of habitats and prefers steppes and semideserts with the predominance of sagebrushes. This paper presents significant differences between these species' nymphs in epicuticular lipid composition (according to gas chromatography with mass spectrometry) and in susceptibility to Metarhizium robertsii and Beauveria bassiana. The main differences in lipid composition are shifts to longer chain and branched hydrocarbons (di- and trimethylalkanes) in C. italicus compared to L. migratoria. C. italicus also has a slightly higher n-alkane content. Fatty acids showed low concentrations in the extracts, and L. migratoria has a wider range of fatty acids than C. italicus does. Susceptibility to M. robertsii and the number of conidia adhering to the cuticle proved to be significantly higher in C. italicus, although conidia germination percentages on epicuticular extracts did not differ between the species. We propose that the hydrocarbon composition of C. italicus may be an adaptation to a wide range of habitats including arid ones but may make the C. italicus cuticle more hospitable for fungi.
C1 [Ganina, Mariya D.; Morozov, Sergey V.] Russian Acad Sci, NN Vorozhtsov Novosibirsk Inst Organ Chem, Siberian Branch, Acad Lavrentyev Ave 9, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
   [Tyurin, Maksim V.; Kryukov, Vadim Yu.] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Systemat & Ecol Anim, Siberian Branch, Frunze Str 11, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia.
   [Zhumatayeva, Ulzhalgas T.] Kazakh Natl Agr Res Univ, Fac Agrabiol, Dept Plant Protect & Quarantine, Abai Ave 8, Alma Ata 050010, Kazakhstan.
   [Lednev, Georgy R.] All Russian Inst Plant Protect, Podbelskogo Ave 3, St Petersburg 196608, Russia.
C3 Russian Academy of Sciences; Vorozhtsov Novosibirsk Institute of Organic
   Chemistry; Russian Academy of Sciences; All-Russian Institute of Plant
   Protection
RP Ganina, MD (corresponding author), Russian Acad Sci, NN Vorozhtsov Novosibirsk Inst Organ Chem, Siberian Branch, Acad Lavrentyev Ave 9, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.; Kryukov, VY (corresponding author), Russian Acad Sci, Inst Systemat & Ecol Anim, Siberian Branch, Frunze Str 11, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia.
EM ganina@nioch.nsc.ru; krukoff@mail.ru
RI Tyurin, Maksim/HZH-4765-2023; Kryukov, Vadim/S-3441-2017
FU Russian Science Foundation (RSF) [20-7410043]; Federal Fundamental
   Scientific Research Program [FWGS-2021-0001]
FX This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (RSF), grant
   number 20-7410043. Maintenance of microorganisms was supported by
   Federal Fundamental Scientific Research Program FWGS-2021-0001.
CR Alkhaibari AM, 2018, VIRULENCE, V9, P1449, DOI 10.1080/21505594.2018.1509665
   Blomquist GJ, 2010, INSECT HYDROCARBONS: BIOLOGY, BIOCHEMISTRY, AND CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, P35, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511711909.004
   Blomquist GJ, 2010, INSECT HYDROCARBONS: BIOLOGY, BIOCHEMISTRY, AND CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, P3, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511711909.002
   Buckner JS, 2010, INSECT HYDROCARBONS: BIOLOGY, BIOCHEMISTRY, AND CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, P187, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511711909.010
   Butt TM, 2016, ADV GENET, V94, P307, DOI 10.1016/bs.adgen.2016.01.006
   Chung H, 2015, BIOESSAYS, V37, P822, DOI 10.1002/bies.201500014
   DOWNER RGH, 1976, AM ZOOL, V16, P733
   Duranton J.-F., 1990, CRIQUET P LERIN SAHE, P1
   GENIN E, 1986, J CHEM ECOL, V12, P1213, DOI 10.1007/BF01012343
   GIBBS A, 1995, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS B, V112, P243, DOI 10.1016/0305-0491(95)00081-X
   Gibbs AG, 2002, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V48, P391, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1910(02)00059-8
   Gibbs AG, 1998, J EXP BIOL, V201, P71
   Golebiowski M, 2021, MYCOLOGIA, V113, P525, DOI 10.1080/00275514.2021.1877520
   Golebiowski M, 2016, CHEM BIODIVERS, V13, P982, DOI 10.1002/cbdv.201500316
   GRUNSHAW JP, 1990, J CHEM ECOL, V16, P2835, DOI 10.1007/BF00979477
   HADLEY NF, 1987, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V33, P677, DOI 10.1016/0022-1910(87)90050-3
   Hajek AE, 2003, J INVERTEBR PATHOL, V82, P12, DOI 10.1016/S0022-2011(02)00198-2
   Hamilton A. G., 1950, Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London, V101, P1
   HAMILTON ANDREW G., 1936, TRANS ROY ENT SOC LONDON, V85, P1
   Hammer Oyvind, 2001, Palaeontologia Electronica, V4, pUnpaginated
   Heuskin S, 2014, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V2, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2014.00037
   Howard RW, 2005, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V50, P371, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130359
   Jarrold SL, 2007, MYCOL RES, V111, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.mycres.2006.10.007
   Kaczmarek A, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0235785
   Kassa A., 2003, THESIS, DOI [10.53846/goediss-1674, DOI 10.53846/GOEDISS-1674]
   Keyhani NO, 2018, FUNGAL BIOL-UK, V122, P420, DOI 10.1016/j.funbio.2017.07.003
   Koukos D, 2015, ACTA BOT GALLICA, V162, P225, DOI 10.1080/12538078.2015.1039579
   Kryukov V. Yu., 2007, Evraziatskii Entomologicheskii Zhurnal, V6, P195
   Latchininsky A.V., 2002, Grasshoppers of Kazakhstan, Middle Asia and Adjacent Territories
   LECUONA R, 1991, J INVERTEBR PATHOL, V58, P10, DOI 10.1016/0022-2011(91)90156-K
   Levchenko M., 2020, PLANT PROTECT NEWS, V103, P150, DOI DOI 10.31993/2308-6459-2020-103-2-13364
   LOCKEY KH, 1976, INSECT BIOCHEM, V6, P457, DOI 10.1016/0020-1790(76)90068-8
   LOCKEY KH, 1990, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS B, V95, P721, DOI 10.1016/0305-0491(90)90310-P
   LOCKEY KH, 1988, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS B, V89, P595, DOI 10.1016/0305-0491(88)90305-7
   MCCLAIN E, 1985, ECOLOGY, V66, P112, DOI 10.2307/1941311
   Ment D, 2013, BIOCONTROL SCI TECHN, V23, P956, DOI 10.1080/09583157.2013.811217
   Ment D, 2010, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V76, P3521, DOI 10.1128/AEM.02596-09
   Menzel F, 2017, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V284, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2016.1727
   Moore D., 2008, Outlooks on Pest Management, V19, P14, DOI 10.1564/19feb05
   Napolitano R, 1997, ARCH BIOCHEM BIOPHYS, V344, P208, DOI 10.1006/abbi.1997.0163
   Nelson DR, 2003, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS B, V134, P447, DOI 10.1016/S1096-4959(02)00262-2
   ORAHA VS, 1990, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS B, V95, P603, DOI 10.1016/0305-0491(90)90028-R
   Ortiz-Urquiza Almudena, 2013, Insects, V4, P357, DOI 10.3390/insects4030357
   Paszkiewicz M, 2016, PHYSIOL ENTOMOL, V41, P111, DOI 10.1111/phen.12133
   Patel Sejal, 2001, Journal of Insect Science (Tucson), V1, P1
   Pedrini N, 2007, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS C, V146, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.cbpc.2006.08.003
   Pedrini N, 2018, FUNGAL BIOL-UK, V122, P538, DOI 10.1016/j.funbio.2017.10.003
   Pedrini N, 2013, FRONT MICROBIOL, V4, DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00024
   Ramsay JA, 1935, J EXP BIOL, V12, P373
   Rourke BC, 2000, J EXP BIOL, V203, P2699
   Ruther J, 2011, ENTOMOL EXP APPL, V140, P59, DOI 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2011.01129.x
   SAITO T, 1983, APPL ENTOMOL ZOOL, V18, P225, DOI 10.1303/aez.18.225
   Sergeev, 2022, ITALIAN LOCUST CALLI, P1, DOI [10.4060/cb7921ru, DOI 10.4060/CB7921RU]
   Sergeev MG, 2021, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/agronomy11040746
   Sergeev MG, 2021, INSECTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/insects12010077
   SosaGomez DR, 1997, J INVERTEBR PATHOL, V69, P31, DOI 10.1006/jipa.1996.4619
   TAYLOR AR, 1975, LIPIDS, V10, P535, DOI 10.1007/BF02532356
   Tomilova OG, 2019, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V116, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2019.05.003
   Tyurin MV, 2016, J EVOL BIOCHEM PHYS+, V52, P252, DOI 10.1134/S002209301603008X
   Verbruggen EMJ, 2000, J PHYS CHEM REF DATA, V29, P1435, DOI 10.1063/1.1347983
   Vötsch W, 2002, INSECT BIOCHEM MOLEC, V32, P1605, DOI 10.1016/S0965-1748(02)00098-X
   Wronska AK, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0192715
NR 62
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 2
U2 13
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2075-4450
J9 INSECTS
JI Insects
PD AUG
PY 2022
VL 13
IS 8
AR 736
DI 10.3390/insects13080736
PG 17
WC Entomology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Entomology
GA 4B5IW
UT WOS:000845811900001
PM 36005361
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Marini, G
   Guzzetta, G
   Toledo, CAM
   Teixeira, M
   Rosà, R
   Merler, S
AF Marini, Giovanni
   Guzzetta, Giorgio
   Marques Toledo, Cecilia A.
   Teixeira, Mauro
   Rosa, Roberto
   Merler, Stefano
TI Effectiveness of Ultra-Low Volume insecticide spraying to prevent dengue
   in a non-endemic metropolitan area of Brazil
SO PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
ID AEDES-AEGYPTI; TRANSMISSION; CULICIDAE; HISTORY; DIPTERA; BURDEN; RISKS;
   CITY
AB Management of vector population is a commonly used method for mitigating transmission of mosquito-borne infections, but quantitative information on its practical public health impact is scarce. We study the effectiveness of Ultra-Low Volume (ULV) insecticide spraying in public spaces for preventing secondary dengue virus (DENV) cases in Porto Alegre, a non-endemic metropolitan area in Brazil. We developed a stochastic transmission model based on detailed entomological, epidemiological and population data, accounting for the geographical distribution of mosquitoes and humans in the study area and spatial transmission dynamics. The model was calibrated against the distribution of DENV cluster sizes previously estimated from the same geographical setting. We estimated a ULV-induced mortality of 40% for mosquitoes and found that the implemented control protocol avoided about 24% of symptomatic cases occurred in the area throughout the 2015-2016 epidemic season. Increasing the radius of treatment or the mortality of mosquitoes by treating gardens and/or indoor premises would greatly improve the result of control, but trade-offs with respect to increased efforts need to be carefully analyzed. We found a moderate effectiveness for ULV-spraying in public areas, mainly due to the limited ability of this strategy in effectively controlling the vector population. These results can be used to support the design of control strategies in low-incidence, non-endemic settings.
   Author summary Dengue is a mosquito-borne infection that causes millions of symptomatic infections and thousands of deaths per year. This pathogen is expanding its geographic range to areas that were previously free from autochthonous transmission thanks to the intensification of international travels, urbanization and to climatic adaptation of mosquitoes and viruses. Usually interventions against dengue transmission consist in insecticide spraying aimed at killing adult mosquitoes, but the impact of this practice has been rarely evaluated in real-life settings. In this work, we estimate the proportion of dengue cases avoided by Ultra-Low-Volume insecticide spraying in public areas in Porto Alegre (Brazil). This city is characterized by a subtropical climate, negligible pre-existing immunity and low dengue incidence. The low incidence makes this region unsuitable for deployment of the currently licensed vaccine, which is only recommended by the WHO for high-transmission areas. We found that insecticide spraying avoided approximately one fourth of all symptomatic cases. The performance of the intervention was negatively affected by the low treatment-induced mosquito mortality, as we estimated that only 40% of Ae. aegypti are killed by the insecticide. Control outcomes could be improved by increasing the targeted area and including private premises, but trade-offs against increased efforts need to be carefully analyzed.
C1 [Marini, Giovanni; Rosa, Roberto] Fdn Edmund Mach, Ctr Ric & Innovaz, Dipartimento Biodiversita & Ecol Mol, San Michele All Adige, Trento, Italy.
   [Guzzetta, Giorgio; Rosa, Roberto; Merler, Stefano] Epilab JRU, FEM FBK Joint Res Unit, Trento, Province Of Tre, Italy.
   [Guzzetta, Giorgio; Merler, Stefano] Bruno Kessler Fdn, Ctr Informat Technol, Trento, Italy.
   [Marques Toledo, Cecilia A.; Teixeira, Mauro] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Inst Ciencias Biol, Dept Bioquim & Imunol, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
   [Rosa, Roberto] Univ Trento, Ctr Agr Food Environm, San Michele All Adige, TN, Italy.
C3 Fondazione Edmund Mach; Fondazione Bruno Kessler; Universidade Federal
   de Minas Gerais; University of Trento
RP Rosà, R (corresponding author), Fdn Edmund Mach, Ctr Ric & Innovaz, Dipartimento Biodiversita & Ecol Mol, San Michele All Adige, Trento, Italy.; Rosà, R (corresponding author), Epilab JRU, FEM FBK Joint Res Unit, Trento, Province Of Tre, Italy.; Rosà, R (corresponding author), Univ Trento, Ctr Agr Food Environm, San Michele All Adige, TN, Italy.
EM roberto.rosa@fmach.it
RI Rosa, Roberto/B-8562-2011; Guzzetta, Giorgio/HKW-7921-2023; Teixeira,
   Mauro/A-4587-2008; Marini, Giovanni/C-3808-2018
OI Teixeira, Mauro/0000-0002-6944-3008; Guzzetta,
   Giorgio/0000-0002-9296-9470; Rosa, Roberto/0000-0002-8655-2230; Marini,
   Giovanni/0000-0001-9721-7211
FU Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia (INCT) em Dengue
   [CNPq/FAPEMIG 573876/2008-08]; FAPEMIG; CNPq
FX U This work was supported by the Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e
   Tecnologia (INCT) em Dengue (CNPq/FAPEMIG 573876/2008-08;
   http://labs.icb.ufmg.br/inctemdengue), FAPEMIG and CNPq. The funders had
   no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to
   publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
CR Aguiar M, 2016, LANCET INFECT DIS, V16, P882, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30168-2
   Alvares CA, 2013, METEOROL Z, V22, P711, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
   ANDIS MD, 1987, J AM MOSQUITO CONTR, V3, P125
   [Anonymous], 2016, Wkly Epidemiol Rec, V91, P266
   Barber JAS, 2007, J AM MOSQUITO CONTR, V23, P55, DOI 10.2987/8756-971X(2007)23[55:FTOMAP]2.0.CO;2
   Barcellos C, 2005, REV SOC BRAS MED TRO, V38, P246, DOI 10.1590/S0037-86822005000300008
   Barmak DH, 2014, EPIDEMIOL INFECT, V142, P545, DOI 10.1017/S0950268813001301
   Bhatt S, 2013, NATURE, V496, P504, DOI 10.1038/nature12060
   Bonds JAS, 2012, MED VET ENTOMOL, V26, P121, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2011.00992.x
   Carrington LB, 2013, J MED ENTOMOL, V50, P43, DOI 10.1603/ME11242
   Chao DL, 2012, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001876
   Ferreira DAD, 2017, PARASITE VECTOR, V10, DOI 10.1186/s13071-017-2025-8
   Dejnirattisai W, 2010, SCIENCE, V328, P745, DOI 10.1126/science.1185181
   Dick OB, 2012, AM J TROP MED HYG, V87, P584, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0770
   Duong V, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P14688, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1508114112
   Esu E, 2010, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V15, P619, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02489.x
   Ferguson NM, 2016, SCIENCE, V353, P1033, DOI 10.1126/science.aaf9590
   Funk S, 2016, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005173
   Gubler Duane J, 2011, Trop Med Health, V39, P3, DOI 10.2149/tmh.2011-S05
   Gunning CE, 2018, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006378
   Guzzetta G, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-05230-4
   Guzzetta G, 2017, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005918
   Halstead SB, 2016, AM J TROP MED HYG, V95, P741, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0222
   Hladish TJ, 2018, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006570
   Hladish TJ, 2016, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004661
   Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica (IBGE), CENSUS 2010
   Karl S, 2014, BMC INFECT DIS, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-447
   Keeling MJ, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P65, DOI 10.1126/science.275.5296.65
   Lourenço J, 2014, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003083
   Mount GA, 1998, J AM MOSQUITO CONTR, V14, P305
   Murray Natasha Evelyn Anne, 2013, Clin Epidemiol, V5, P299, DOI 10.2147/CLEP.S34440
   Otero M, 2006, B MATH BIOL, V68, P1945, DOI 10.1007/s11538-006-9067-y
   Perich MJ, 2000, J MED ENTOMOL, V37, P541, DOI 10.1603/0022-2585-37.4.541
   Pliego EP, 2018, J THEOR BIOL, V437, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.10.025
   Reiner RC, 2013, J R SOC INTERFACE, V10, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2012.0921
   Salje H, 2017, SCIENCE, V355, P1302, DOI 10.1126/science.aaj9384
   Shepard DS, 2016, LANCET INFECT DIS, V16, P935, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00146-8
   Sorichetta A, 2015, SCI DATA, V2, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2015.45
   Tumioto GL, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0104394
   Vanlerberghe V, 2017, REV PANAM SALUD PUBL, V41, DOI 10.26633/RPSP.2017.16
   Vazquez-Prokopec GM, 2017, SCI ADV, V3, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1602024
   Wilder-Smith A, 2008, MED CLIN N AM, V92, P1377, DOI 10.1016/j.mcna.2008.07.002
NR 42
TC 14
Z9 14
U1 0
U2 5
PU PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
PI SAN FRANCISCO
PA 1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA
EI 1553-7358
J9 PLOS COMPUT BIOL
JI PLoS Comput. Biol.
PD MAR
PY 2019
VL 15
IS 3
AR e1006831
DI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006831
PG 13
WC Biochemical Research Methods; Mathematical & Computational Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Mathematical & Computational Biology
GA HS4YW
UT WOS:000463877900033
PM 30849074
OA Green Published, gold, Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Kassie, BT
   Hengsdijk, H
   Rötter, R
   Kahiluoto, H
   Asseng, S
   Van Ittersum, M
AF Kassie, Belay Tseganeh
   Hengsdijk, Huib
   Rotter, Reimund
   Kahiluoto, Helena
   Asseng, Senthold
   Van Ittersum, Martin
TI Adapting to Climate Variability and Change: Experiences from
   Cereal-Based Farming in the Central Rift and Kobo Valleys, Ethiopia
SO ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; Farm households; Adaptation strategies; Perceptions;
   Central Rift Valley; Kobo Valley
ID SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; COPING STRATEGIES; RAINFALL; ADAPTATION; DROUGHT;
   RISK; AGRICULTURE; PERCEPTIONS; FARMERS; SYSTEMS
AB Small-holder farmers in Ethiopia are facing several climate related hazards, in particular highly variable rainfall with severe droughts which can have devastating effects on their livelihoods. Projected changes in climate are expected to aggravate the existing challenges. This study examines farmer perceptions on current climate variability and long-term changes, current adaptive strategies, and potential barriers for successful further adaptation in two case study regions-the Central Rift Valley (CRV) and Kobo Valley. The study was based on a household questionnaire, interviews with key stakeholders, and focus group discussions. The result revealed that about 99 % of the respondents at the CRV and 96 % at the Kobo Valley perceived an increase in temperature and 94 % at CRV and 91 % at the Kobo Valley perceived a decrease in rainfall over the last 20-30 years. Inter-annual and intraseasonal rainfall variability also has increased according to the farmers. The observed climate data (1977-2009) also showed an increasing trend in temperature and high inter-annual and intra-seasonal rainfall variability. In contrast to farmers' perceptions of a decrease in rainfall totals, observed rainfall data showed no statistically significant decline. The interaction among various bio-physical and socio-economic factors, changes in rainfall intensity and reduced water available to crops due to increased hot spells, may have influenced the perception of farmers with respect to rainfall trends. In recent decades, farmers in both the CRV and Kobo have changed farming practices to adapt to perceived climate change and variability, for example, through crop and variety choice, adjustment of cropping calendar, and in situ moisture conservation. These relatively low-cost changes in farm practices were within the limited adaptation capacity of farmers, which may be insufficient to deal with the impacts of future climate change. Anticipated climate change is expected to impose new risks outside the range of current experiences. To enable farmers to adapt to these impacts critical technological, institutional, and market-access constraints need to be removed. Inconsistencies between farmers' perceptions and observed climate trends (e.g., decrease in annual rainfall) could lead to sub-optimal or counterproductive adaptations, and therefore must be removed by better communication and capacity building, for example through Climate Field Schools. Enabling strategies, which are among others targeted at agricultural inputs, credit supply, market access, and strengthening of local knowledge and information services need to become integral part of government policies to assist farmers to adapt to the impacts of current and future climate change.
C1 [Kassie, Belay Tseganeh; Van Ittersum, Martin] Wageningen Univ, Plant Prod Syst Grp, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands.
   [Kassie, Belay Tseganeh] Amhara Reg Agr Res Inst, Bahir Dar 527, Ethiopia.
   [Hengsdijk, Huib] Plant Res Int, Wageningen, Netherlands.
   [Rotter, Reimund; Kahiluoto, Helena] MTT Agri Food Res Finland, Mikkeli, Finland.
   [Asseng, Senthold] Univ Florida, Dept Agr Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.
   [Asseng, Senthold] Univ Florida, Dept Biol Engn, Gainesville, FL USA.
C3 Wageningen University & Research; Natural Resources Institute Finland
   (Luke); State University System of Florida; University of Florida; State
   University System of Florida; University of Florida
RP Kassie, BT (corresponding author), Wageningen Univ, Plant Prod Syst Grp, Droevendaalsesteeg 1,430, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands.
EM belay_tsega@yahoo.com
RI Asseng, Senthold/Y-6014-2019; Hengsdijk, Huib/HOH-9848-2023; van
   Ittersum, Martin/J-8024-2014; Rotter, Reimund P./Y-9579-2019
OI Asseng, Senthold/0000-0002-7583-3811; Hengsdijk,
   Huib/0000-0002-9288-0118; van Ittersum, Martin/0000-0001-8611-6781;
   Rotter, Reimund P./0000-0002-3804-9964
FU Academy of Finland [127405]; Academy of Finland (AKA) [127405] Funding
   Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
FX Authors would like to thank farmers of the case study areas for their
   active participation during interviews and focal group discussions and
   for sharing their local knowledge. Thanks to agricultural experts and
   development agents of Admitulu Jido Kombolcha, Dugida, and Kobo offices
   of agriculture and rural development for providing baseline data and
   facilitating our field work with farmers. We are grateful to the Academy
   of Finland (decision no. 127405) for funding this research as part of
   AlterCLIMA project.
CR Adger WN, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P717
   Amsalu A, 2007, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V83, P448, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.04.010
   [Anonymous], 2007, Climate Change National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) of Ethiopia
   [Anonymous], 2007, INT FOOD POLICY RES
   [Anonymous], 2007, Land and Water Resources Assessment in the Ethiopian Central Rift Valley
   [Anonymous], 35 TYND CTR CLIM CHA
   [Anonymous], 2008, ETHIOP J DEV RES, DOI DOI 10.4314/ejdr.v29i1.38642
   Araya A, 2010, AGR WATER MANAGE, V97, P841, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.01.012
   Asseng S, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V118, P167, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0623-1
   Below T., 2010, Micro-level Practices to Adapt to Climate Change for African Small-scale Farmers
   Bewket Woldeamlak, 2012, International Journal of Environmental Studies, V69, P507, DOI 10.1080/00207233.2012.683328
   Boko M, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P433
   Bryan E, 2009, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V12, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.11.002
   Central Statistical Agency [CSA], 2020, FED DEM REP ETH CENT
   Cheung WH, 2008, INT J CLIMATOL, V28, P1723, DOI 10.1002/joc.1623
   Coe R, 2011, EXP AGR, V47, P395, DOI 10.1017/S001447971100010X
   Conway D, 2004, INT J CLIMATOL, V24, P77, DOI 10.1002/joc.989
   Conway D, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.013
   Cooper PJM, 2008, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V126, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.007
   Davidson O, 2003, CLIM POLICY, V3, pS97, DOI 10.1016/j.clipol.2003.10.007
   Demeke AB, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V108, P185, DOI [10.1007/s10584-010-9994-3, 10.1007/S10584-010-9994-3]
   Deressa TT, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.01.002
   Deressa TT, 2009, J AFR ECON, V18, P529, DOI 10.1093/jae/ejp002
   Eriksen S, 2009, ENVIRON MANAGE, V43, P817, DOI 10.1007/s00267-008-9189-0
   FAO, 2007, 14 FAO WORLD BANK
   Garedew E, 2010, THESIS SWED U AGR SC
   Georgis K., 2004, Seventh Eastern and Southern Africa Regional maize conference, P313
   Glantz M.H., 2009, Environ. Nat. Resour. Manag. Ser. Monit. Assess.-Food Agric. Organ. United Nations, V15, P33
   Gray C, 2012, WORLD DEV, V40, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.05.023
   Haileslassie A, 2005, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V108, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2004.12.010
   Hansen J., 2007, Journal of SAT Agricultural Research, V4, P1
   Huq S, 2004, CLIM POLICY, V4, P25
   Inc SPSS, 2007, SPSS BAS 16 WIND US
   Jones PG, 2009, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V12, P427, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.08.006
   Kahiluoto H, 2012, FORUM DEV STUD, V39, P51, DOI 10.1080/08039410.2011.635381
   Kandji SerigneTacko., 2006, Climate Change and Variability in the Sahel Region: Impacts and Adaptation Strategies in the Agricultural Sector
   Kato E, 2011, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V42, P593, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00539.x
   Kidanu A., 2009, Linking Population, Fertility and Family Planning with Adaptation to Climate Change: Views from Ethiopia
   Mehari A, 2011, IRRIG DRAIN, V60, P163, DOI 10.1002/ird.565
   Mersha E., 2005, Monitoring and predicting agricultural drought. A global study, P227
   Meze-Hausken E, 2004, CLIM RES, V27, P19, DOI 10.3354/cr027019
   Müller C, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P4313, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1015078108
   Ngigi S.N., 2009, Climate Change Adaptation Strategies: Water Resources Management Options for Smallholder Farming Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa, P189, DOI 978-92-9059-264-8
   Osbahr H, 2011, EXP AGR, V47, P293, DOI 10.1017/S0014479710000785
   Rao KPC, 2011, EXP AGR, V47, P267, DOI 10.1017/S0014479710000918
   Rotter R, 1997, AGR SYST, V53, P69, DOI 10.1016/S0308-521X(96)00037-6
   Seleshi Y, 2006, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V83, P181, DOI 10.1007/s00704-005-0134-3
   Seleshi Y, 2004, INT J CLIMATOL, V24, P973, DOI 10.1002/joc.1052
   Slegers MFW, 2008, J ARID ENVIRON, V72, P2106, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.06.011
   Slegers M.F.W, 2008, THESIS WASHINGTON U
   Solomon S., 2007, IPCC 2007, P2
   Stigter K., 2008, Bulletin - World Meteorological Organization, V57, P114
   Thomas DSG, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V83, P301, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9205-4
   Thornton PK, 2007, HUM ECOL, V35, P461, DOI 10.1007/s10745-007-9118-5
   Thornton PK, 2011, PHILOS T R SOC A, V369, P117, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2010.0246
   Thornton PK, 2010, AGR SYST, V103, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2009.09.003
   Tittonell P, 2010, AGR SYST, V103, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2009.10.001
   Tompkins EL, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.010
   Trærup SLM, 2011, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V11, P471, DOI 10.1007/s10113-010-0156-y
   Van den Berg H, 2007, WORLD DEV, V35, P663, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.004
   van Steenbergen F, 2011, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V25, P1899, DOI 10.1007/s11269-011-9780-7
NR 61
TC 83
Z9 97
U1 2
U2 103
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 0364-152X
EI 1432-1009
J9 ENVIRON MANAGE
JI Environ. Manage.
PD NOV
PY 2013
VL 52
IS 5
BP 1115
EP 1131
DI 10.1007/s00267-013-0145-2
PG 17
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 242ME
UT WOS:000326245300007
PM 23943096
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Rawlins, S
   Chen, A
   Rawlins, J
   Chadee, D
   Legall, G
AF Rawlins, S. C.
   Chen, A.
   Rawlins, J. M.
   Chadee, D. D.
   Legall, G.
TI A knowledge, attitude and practices study of the issues of climate
   change/variability impacts and public health in Trinidad and Tobago, and
   St Kitts and Nevis
SO WEST INDIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
LA English
DT Article
AB Objective: To determine the level of understanding of the issues of climate change (CC)/variability (C V) and public health by populations of St Kitts and Nevis (SKN) and Trinidad and Tobago (T&T) and to find whether respondents would be willing to incorporate these values into strategies for dengue fever (DF) prevention.
   Design and Methods: Using a cluster sampling system, representative samples of the communities of SKN (22 7) and T&T (650) were surveyed for responses to a questionnaire document with questions on the impact of climate variability on health, the physical environment, respondents' willingness to utilize climate issues to predict and adapt to climate variability for DF prevention. Data were analyzed by Epi Info.
   Results: Sixty-two per cent SKN and 55% T&T of respondents showed some understanding of the concept of climate change (CC) and distinguished this from climate variability (C V). With regard to causes of CC, 48% SKN and 50% T&T attributed CC to all of: green houses gases, holes in the ozone layer burning of vegetation and vehicular exhaust gases. However some 39.3% SKN and 31% (T&T) did not answer this question.
   In response to ranking issues of life affected by CC/CV in both countries, respondents ranked them: health > water resources > agriculture > biodiversity > coastal degradation. The major health issues identified for SKN and T&T respondents were: food-borne diseases > water-borne diseases > heat stresses; vector-borne diseases were only ranked 4(th) and 5(th) for SKN and T&T respondents respectively. There was in both countries a significant proportion of respondents (p < 0.001) who reported wet season-related increase of DF cases as a CC/CV link. Respondents identified use of environmental sanitation (ES) at appropriate times as a method of choice of using CC/CV to prevent DF outbreaks. More than 82% in both countries saw the use of the CCIC V information for DF prevention by prediction and control as strategic but only 50-51 % were inclined to become personally involved Currently, only 50% SKN and 45% T&T respondents claimed current involvement in DF vector surveillance and control in the last two days.
   Conclusion: Despite the fact that knowledge and attitudes did not always coincide with practices of using ES for DF prevention, in both countries, even with CC/CV tools of prediction being available, it seems that respondents could be persuaded to use such strategies. There is a need for demonstration of the efficacy of CC/CV information and promotion of its usefulness for community involvement in DF and possibly other disease prevention.
C1 Caribbean Epidemiol Ctr, Port Of Spain, Trinidad Tobago.
   Univ W Indies, Dept Phys, Kingston 7, Jamaica.
   Univ W Indies, Publ Hlth & Primary Care Unit, St Augustine, Trinidad Tobago.
   Univ W Indies, Dept Sci & Agr, St Augustine, Trinidad Tobago.
C3 University West Indies Mona Jamaica; University West Indies Mona
   Jamaica; University West Indies Saint Augustine; University West Indies
   Mona Jamaica; University West Indies Saint Augustine
RP Rawlins, S (corresponding author), Caribbean Epidemiol Ctr, POB 164, Port Of Spain, Trinidad Tobago.
EM rawlinsaiacc@wow.net
CR AMARKOON D, 2004, W INDIAN MED J S2, V53, P60
   [Anonymous], W INDIAN MED J
   Blades E., 1998, West Indian Med J, V47, P34
   FOCKS DA, 1995, AM J TROP MED HYG, V53, P489, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.489
   Githeko AK, 2000, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V78, P1136
   GITHEKO AK, 2001, GLOBAL CHANGE HUMAN, V1, P54
   Gyan K., 2003, W INDIAN MED J, V52, P46
   Hay SI, 2002, TRENDS PARASITOL, V18, P530, DOI 10.1016/S1471-4922(02)02374-7
   Kovats RS, 2001, PHILOS T R SOC B, V356, P1057, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2001.0894
   MCCARTY JJ, 2001, 3 IPCC
   Molyneux DH, 2003, T ROY SOC TROP MED H, V97, P129, DOI 10.1016/S0035-9203(03)90097-6
   PETERSON TC, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES, V16, P1
   Tilman D, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P281, DOI 10.1126/science.1057544
   Zell R, 2004, INT J MED MICROBIOL, V293, P16, DOI 10.1016/S1433-1128(04)80005-6
NR 14
TC 15
Z9 18
U1 0
U2 16
PU UNIV WEST INDIES FACULTY MEDICAL SCIENCES
PI KINGSTON
PA MONA CAMPUS, KINGSTON 7, JAMAICA
SN 0043-3144
EI 2309-5830
J9 W INDIAN MED J
JI West Ind. Med. J.
PD MAR
PY 2007
VL 56
IS 2
BP 115
EP 121
PG 7
WC Medicine, General & Internal
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC General & Internal Medicine
GA 202ML
UT WOS:000248905700003
PM 17910140
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Dutta, A
   McDonald, BA
   Croll, D
AF Dutta, Anik
   McDonald, Bruce A.
   Croll, Daniel
TI Combined reference-free and multi-reference based GWAS uncover cryptic
   variation underlying rapid adaptation in a fungal plant pathogen
SO PLOS PATHOGENS
LA English
DT Article
ID GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; POPULATION-STRUCTURE; RESISTANCE; WHEAT;
   VIRULENCE; BACTERIA; TRITICI; VISUALIZATION; MELANIZATION; DIVERSITY
AB Microbial pathogens often harbor substantial functional diversity driven by structural genetic variation. Rapid adaptation from such standing variation threatens global food security and human health. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) provide a powerful approach to identify genetic variants underlying recent pathogen adaptation. However, the reliance on single reference genomes and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) obscures the true extent of adaptive genetic variation. Here, we show quantitatively how a combination of multiple reference genomes and reference-free approaches captures substantially more relevant genetic variation compared to single reference mapping. We performed reference-genome based association mapping across 19 reference-quality genomes covering the diversity of the species. We contrasted the results with a reference-free (i.e., k-mer) approach using raw whole-genome sequencing data in a panel of 145 strains collected across the global distribution range of the fungal wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici. We mapped the genetic architecture of 49 life history traits including virulence, reproduction and growth in multiple stressful environments. The inclusion of additional reference genome SNP datasets provides a nearly linear increase in additional loci mapped through GWAS. Variants detected through the k-mer approach explained a higher proportion of phenotypic variation than a reference genome-based approach and revealed functionally confirmed loci that classic GWAS approaches failed to map. The power of GWAS in microbial pathogens can be significantly enhanced by comprehensively capturing structural genetic variation. Our approach is generalizable to a large number of species and will uncover novel mechanisms driving rapid adaptation of pathogens.
   Mapping trait variation to polymorphism within species has become a cornerstone of modern biology. Applications in microbial pathogens (both bacteria and fungi) have produced major insights into their ecology, emergence of resistance, gains in virulence and climatic adaptation. However, microbial populations collected from the environment often express major adaptive traits governed by complex genetic variation. Standard genome-wide association studies (GWAS) based on single nucleotide polymorphisms have typically failed to reveal the full extent of loci contributing to such traits. We provide the first quantitative assessment of GWAS in a fungal pathogen comprehensively accounting for complex sequence variation. We used an environmental collection of the global fungal pathogen of wheat, Zymoseptoria tritici, as a case study. We analyzed a panel of 145 strains collected across the global distribution range and gathered trait variation data on 49 distinct traits. We integrated complex sequence variation among strains systematically into the association mapping and found that multiple approaches are needed to cover satisfactorily causal loci for trait variation. Our approach is generalizable to many microbial species and will uncover novel mechanisms driving rapid host adaptation in microbial populations.
C1 [Dutta, Anik; McDonald, Bruce A.] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Integrat Biol, Plant Pathol, Zurich, Switzerland.
   [Croll, Daniel] Univ Neuchatel, Inst Biol, Lab Evolutionary Genet, Neuchatel, Switzerland.
   [Dutta, Anik] Christian Albrecht Univ Kiel, Inst Phytopathol, Kiel, Germany.
C3 Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology Domain; ETH Zurich; University of
   Neuchatel; University of Kiel
RP Croll, D (corresponding author), Univ Neuchatel, Inst Biol, Lab Evolutionary Genet, Neuchatel, Switzerland.
EM daniel.croll@unine.ch
RI Croll, Daniel/AAD-6695-2020; Croll, Daniel/C-1661-2018
OI Croll, Daniel/0000-0002-2072-380X
FU Swiss Federal Office for Agriculture (BLW) [627000640]
FX BAM was supported by the Swiss Federal Office for Agriculture (BLW) in
   the framework of the NAP-PGREL Project Nr. 627000640. The funder had no
   role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish,
   or preparation of the manuscript.
CR Allen JP, 2021, TRENDS MICROBIOL, V29, P621, DOI 10.1016/j.tim.2020.12.002
   Aun E, 2018, PLOS COMPUT BIOL, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006434
   Baddam R, 2014, SCI REP-UK, V4, DOI 10.1038/srep07457
   Badet T, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-23862-x
   Badet T, 2020, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V56, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2020.04.009
   Badet T, 2020, BMC BIOL, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12915-020-0744-3
   Bartoli C, 2017, FRONT PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.00763
   Bayer PE, 2020, NAT PLANTS, V6, P914, DOI 10.1038/s41477-020-0733-0
   Bolger AM, 2014, BIOINFORMATICS, V30, P2114, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
   Bonneaud C, 2020, EVOL LETT, V4, P491, DOI 10.1002/evl3.203
   Casadevall A, 2011, PLOS PATHOG, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002136
   Caseys C, 2021, G3-GENES GENOM GENET, V11, DOI 10.1093/g3journal/jkab175
   Colque-Little C, 2021, BMC PLANT BIOL, V21, DOI 10.1186/s12870-020-02804-7
   Cools HJ, 2013, PEST MANAG SCI, V69, P150, DOI 10.1002/ps.3348
   Croll D, 2015, GENETICS, V201, P1213, DOI 10.1534/genetics.115.180968
   Demirjian C, 2023, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V28, P471, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2022.11.006
   Devlin B, 1999, BIOMETRICS, V55, P997, DOI 10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00997.x
   Dixon P, 2003, J VEG SCI, V14, P927, DOI 10.1658/1100-9233(2003)014[0927:VAPORF]2.0.CO;2
   Dutilh BE, 2013, BRIEF FUNCT GENOMICS, V12, P366, DOI 10.1093/bfgp/elt008
   Dutta A, 2021, ISME J, V15, P1402, DOI 10.1038/s41396-020-00859-w
   Dutta A, 2021, EVOL APPL, V14, P335, DOI 10.1111/eva.13117
   Ehrlich GD, 2005, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P20, DOI 10.1097/01.blo.0000175124.52590.c0
   Figueroa M, 2018, MOL PLANT PATHOL, V19, P1523, DOI 10.1111/mpp.12618
   Firrao G, 2018, FRONT MICROBIOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00656
   Fisher MC, 2012, NATURE, V484, P186, DOI 10.1038/nature10947
   Fones H, 2015, FUNGAL GENET BIOL, V79, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.04.004
   Gage JL, 2019, PLANT GENOME-US, V12, DOI 10.3835/plantgenome2018.09.0069
   Golicz AA, 2020, TRENDS GENET, V36, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2019.11.006
   Goodwin SB, 2011, PLOS GENET, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002070
   Gori A, 2020, MBIO, V11, DOI 10.1128/mBio.00728-20
   Gudbjartsson DF, 2008, NAT GENET, V40, P609, DOI 10.1038/ng.122
   Guo J, 2020, GENOME BIOL, V21, DOI 10.1186/s13059-020-02169-y
   Gupta PK, 2021, TRENDS GENET, V37, P868, DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2021.05.006
   Hammond JA, 2020, BIOCHEM SOC T, V48, P2437, DOI 10.1042/BST20190713
   Hartmann FE, 2021, MOL ECOL, V30, P5390, DOI 10.1111/mec.15737
   Hartmann FE, 2018, MOL ECOL, V27, P2725, DOI 10.1111/mec.14711
   Hartmann FE, 2017, ISME J, V11, P1189, DOI 10.1038/ismej.2016.196
   Holt KE, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, pE3574, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1501049112
   Jaillard M, 2020, GIGASCIENCE, V9, DOI 10.1093/gigascience/giaa110
   Jaillard M, 2018, PLOS GENET, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007758
   Kahle D, 2013, R J, V5, P144
   Kang HM, 2008, GENETICS, V178, P1709, DOI 10.1534/genetics.107.080101
   Karisto P, 2018, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V108, P568, DOI [10.1094/PHYTO-04-17-0163-R, 10.1094/phyto-04-17-0163-r]
   Krishnan P, 2018, BMC BIOL, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12915-018-0543-2
   Laabei M, 2014, GENOME RES, V24, P839, DOI 10.1101/gr.165415.113
   Langmead B, 2012, NAT METHODS, V9, P357, DOI [10.1038/NMETH.1923, 10.1038/nmeth.1923]
   Langmead B, 2009, GENOME BIOL, V10, DOI 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25
   Langner T, 2021, PLOS GENET, V17, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009386
   Lassalle F, 2015, RES MICROBIOL, V166, P729, DOI 10.1016/j.resmic.2015.06.008
   Lees JA, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms12797
   Lendenmann MH, 2015, FUNGAL GENET BIOL, V80, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.05.001
   Lendenmann MH, 2014, G3-GENES GENOM GENET, V4, P2519, DOI 10.1534/g3.114.015289
   Lex A, 2014, IEEE T VIS COMPUT GR, V20, P1983, DOI 10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346248
   Liu F, 2014, BMC GENOMICS, V15, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1163
   McKenna A, 2010, GENOME RES, V20, P1297, DOI 10.1101/gr.107524.110
   Meile L, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V219, P1048, DOI 10.1111/nph.15180
   Meric G, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-07368-7
   Mohd-Assaad N, 2016, MOL ECOL, V25, P6124, DOI 10.1111/mec.13916
   Oggenfuss U, 2021, ELIFE, V10, DOI 10.7554/eLife.69249
   Pereira D, 2020, GENOME BIOL EVOL, V12, P2231, DOI 10.1093/gbe/evaa203
   Pereira D, 2020, FUNGAL GENET BIOL, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.fgb.2020.103398
   Peter J, 2018, NATURE, V556, P339, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0030-5
   Plaumann PL, 2018, FRONT MICROBIOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01005
   Purcell S, 2007, AM J HUM GENET, V81, P559, DOI 10.1086/519795
   Qin CF, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI [10.1038/srep20483, 10.1038/srep36888]
   Quinlan AR, 2010, BIOINFORMATICS, V26, P841, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033
   Rahman A, 2018, ELIFE, V7, DOI 10.7554/eLife.32920
   Ritz C, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0146021
   Sánchez-Vallet A, 2018, MOL PLANT PATHOL, V19, P3, DOI 10.1111/mpp.12592
   Sheppard SK, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P11923, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1305559110
   Shin J.H., 2006, Journal of Statistical Software, V16, P1, DOI DOI 10.18637/JSS.V016.C03
   Singh NK, 2021, MICROB GENOMICS, V7, DOI 10.1099/mgen.0.000678
   Singh NK, 2021, BMC GENOMICS, V22, DOI 10.1186/s12864-021-07691-2
   Stalder L, 2023, MOL ECOL, V32, P2443, DOI 10.1111/mec.16435
   Stefansson TS, 2014, PLANT PATHOL, V63, P405, DOI 10.1111/ppa.12111
   Tettelin H, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P13950, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0506758102
   Todesco M, 2020, NATURE, V584, P602, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2467-6
   Torriani SFF, 2015, FUNGAL GENET BIOL, V79, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.04.010
   Tripodi P, 2021, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V118, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2104315118
   Turner S.D., 2018, J. Open Source Softw, V3, P731, DOI [10.1101/005165, 10.21105/joss.00731, DOI 10.21105/JOSS.00731]
   Valiente-Mullor C, 2021, PLOS COMPUT BIOL, V17, DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008678
   Voichek Y, 2020, NAT GENET, V52, P534, DOI 10.1038/s41588-020-0612-7
   Wainschtein P, 2022, NAT GENET, V54, P263, DOI 10.1038/s41588-021-00997-7
   Weinert LA, 2015, NAT COMMUN, V6, DOI 10.1038/ncomms8272
   Wickham H., 2009, ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, DOI [10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3, 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4]
   Wu YC, 2018, FRONT MICROBIOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03096
   Yair S, 2022, PHILOS T R SOC B, V377, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2020.0416
   Yang J, 2011, EUR J HUM GENET, V19, P807, DOI 10.1038/ejhg.2011.39
   Yang JA, 2011, AM J HUM GENET, V88, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011
   Yin ZQ, 2022, MICROBIOL SPECTR, V10, DOI 10.1128/spectrum.02072-21
   Young BC, 2019, ELIFE, V8, DOI 10.7554/eLife.42486
   Zeevi D, 2019, NATURE, V568, P43, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1065-y
   Zhan J, 2005, MOL ECOL, V14, P2683, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02638.x
   Zhang YD, 2023, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V51, pD767, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkac832
   Zhang ZW, 2010, NAT GENET, V42, P355, DOI 10.1038/ng.546
   Zhou X, 2012, NAT GENET, V44, P821, DOI 10.1038/ng.2310
   Zou YQ, 2019, NAT BIOTECHNOL, V37, P179, DOI 10.1038/s41587-018-0008-8
   Zuk O, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P1193, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1119675109
NR 98
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 4
U2 14
PU PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
PI SAN FRANCISCO
PA 1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA
SN 1553-7366
EI 1553-7374
J9 PLOS PATHOG
JI PLoS Pathog.
PD NOV
PY 2023
VL 19
IS 11
AR e1011801
DI 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011801
PG 27
WC Microbiology; Parasitology; Virology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Microbiology; Parasitology; Virology
GA Z1GX7
UT WOS:001109648300001
PM 37972199
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sobolevskaia, V
   Ajo-Franklin, J
   Cheng, F
   Dou, S
   Lindsey, NJ
   Wagner, A
AF Sobolevskaia, Valeriia
   Ajo-Franklin, Jonathan
   Cheng, Feng
   Dou, Shan
   Lindsey, Nathaniel J.
   Wagner, Anna
TI Monitoring Water Level of a Surficial Aquifer Using Distributed Acoustic
   Sensing and Ballistic Surface Waves
SO WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE remote sensing; modeling; monitoring; hydrogeophysics; model calibration
ID SEISMIC VELOCITY CHANGES; SEASONAL-VARIATIONS; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS;
   UNSATURATED ZONE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; LOS-ANGELES; GROUNDWATER; INVERSION;
   SHALLOW; AREA
AB Groundwater resources play an increasingly crucial role in providing the water required to sustain the environment. However, our understanding of the state of surficial aquifers and their spatiotemporal dynamics remains poor. In this study, we demonstrate how Rayleigh wave velocity variation can be used as a direct indicator of changes in the water level of a surficial aquifer in a discontinuous permafrost environment. Distributed acoustic sensing data, collected on a trenched fiber-optic cable in Fairbanks, AK, was processed using the multichannel analysis of surface waves approach to obtain temporal velocity variations. A semi-permanent surface orbital vibrator was utilized to provide a repeatable source of energy for monitoring. To understand the observed velocity perturbations, we developed a rock physics model (RPM) representing the aquifer with the underlying permafrost and accounting for physical processes associated with water level change. Our analyses demonstrated a strong correlation between precipitation-driven head variation and seismic velocity changes at all recorded frequencies. The proposed model accurately predicted a recorded 3% velocity increase for each 0.5 m of head drop and indicated that the pore pressure effect accounted for approximately 75% of the observed phase velocity change. Surface wave inversion and sensitivity analysis suggested that the high velocity contrast in the permafrost table shifts the surface wave sensitivity toward the first 3 m of soil where hydrological forcing occurs. This case study demonstrates how surface wave analysis combined with an RPM can be used for quantitative interpretation of the acoustic response of surficial aquifers.
   Groundwater will potentially become the dominant source of fresh water as surface water accessibility deteriorates due to a warming climate. Therefore, sustainable aquifer management will become critical to changing climate adaptation. While direct measurement of water levels using wells is the primary tool in aquifer monitoring, it is inadequate for large-scale aquifer management due to its numerous limitations and intrinsic aquifer heterogeneity. We present a case study where seismic velocities recorded on a fiber-optic cable were successfully used to predict relative water table change in a shallow aquifer in Fairbanks, AK. The observed strong correlation between hydrologic processes and aquifer acoustic signatures was reconstructed using a model that accounted for physical processes associated with water level change. This study demonstrates that seismic velocities can be used to monitor shallow aquifer dynamics with adequate spatial and temporal resolution.
   Groundwater level variations can cause significant changes in seismic velocities Pore pressure effects are the predominant hydrological forcing responsible for surface wave velocity perturbations in surficial aquifers Relative velocity change can be accurately reproduced by a well-calibrated rock physics model
C1 [Sobolevskaia, Valeriia; Ajo-Franklin, Jonathan] Rice Univ, Dept Earth Environm & Planetary Sci, Houston, TX 77251 USA.
   [Cheng, Feng] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Earth Sci, Hangzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Dou, Shan] Loblaw Digital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   [Lindsey, Nathaniel J.] FiberSense Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
   [Wagner, Anna] USArmy Cold Reg Res & Engn Lab CRREL, Fairbanks, AK USA.
C3 Rice University; Zhejiang University
RP Ajo-Franklin, J (corresponding author), Rice Univ, Dept Earth Environm & Planetary Sci, Houston, TX 77251 USA.
EM ja62@rice.edu
RI Ajo-Franklin, Jonathan/ABG-2550-2020; Cheng, Feng/HGD-2327-2022;
   Ajo-Franklin, Jonathan/G-7169-2015
OI Ajo-Franklin, Jonathan/0000-0002-6666-4702; Cheng,
   Feng/0000-0002-1119-4096; Sobolevskaia, Valeriia/0000-0001-7405-7462
FU Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP)
   [RC-2437]; Mills Bennett fellowship program
FX Field work of this project was supported by the Strategic Environmental
   Research and Development Program (SERDP), Grant RC-2437. Authors would
   like to thank the field team not mentioned including Craig Ulrich,
   Arthur Gelvin, Stephanie Saari, Seth Saltiel, Ian Ekblaw, Todd Wood.
   Valeriia Sobolevskaia's research was funded by Mills Bennett fellowship
   program (2021-2022).
CR Ajo-Franklin J., 2017, Expanded Abstracts of the 87th SEG Ann. Internat. Mtg, P5223, DOI DOI 10.1190/SEGAM2017-17774027.1
   Andajani RD, 2020, EARTH PLANETS SPACE, V72, DOI 10.1186/s40623-020-01311-1
   Anderson D.M., 1973, P 2 INT C PERMAFROST, P289
   Annan AP, 2005, WTR SCI TEC LIBR, V50, P185
   Bachrach R, 2008, GEOPHYSICS, V73, pE197, DOI 10.1190/1.2985821
   Barajas A, 2021, GEOCHEM GEOPHY GEOSY, V22, DOI 10.1029/2021GC009742
   BATZLE M, 1992, GEOPHYSICS, V57, P1396, DOI 10.1190/1.1443207
   Bawden GW, 2001, NATURE, V412, P812, DOI 10.1038/35090558
   Bell JW, 2008, WATER RESOUR RES, V44, DOI 10.1029/2007WR006152
   Bense VF, 2009, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V36, DOI 10.1029/2009GL039225
   Bergamo P, 2016, GEOPHYSICS, V81, pEN1, DOI 10.1190/GEO2015-0275.1
   Berryman J. G., 1995, Rock Physics & Phase Relations, American, V3, P205, DOI DOI 10.1029/RF003P0205
   Berryman JG, 1999, GEOPHYSICS, V64, P1627, DOI 10.1190/1.1444667
   Bettinelli P, 2008, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V266, P332, DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.11.021
   bin Azhar AS, 2019, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V78, DOI 10.1007/s12665-019-8203-6
   Binley A, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P3837, DOI 10.1002/2015WR017016
   BIRKELO BA, 1987, GROUND WATER, V25, P703, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1987.tb02211.x
   Bordes C, 2015, GEOPHYS J INT, V200, P1317, DOI 10.1093/gji/ggu464
   Brenguier F, 2014, SCIENCE, V345, P80, DOI 10.1126/science.1254073
   Briggs MA, 2018, LIMNOLOGICA, V68, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.limno.2017.02.005
   Brunori CA, 2015, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V7, P8610, DOI 10.3390/rs70708610
   CAMPBELL GS, 1988, IRRIGATION SCI, V9, P265, DOI 10.1007/BF00296702
   Castellazzi P, 2016, GROUNDWATER, V54, P768, DOI 10.1111/gwat.12453
   Chadwick RA, 2012, INT J GREENH GAS CON, V10, P374, DOI 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.06.022
   Chakraborty M, 2015, CURR POLLUT REP, V1, P220, DOI 10.1007/s40726-015-0022-0
   Chandrasekar S., 1989, Journal of Materials Science, V24, P4265, DOI 10.1007/BF00544497
   Chaussard E, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V119, P6572, DOI 10.1002/2014JB011266
   Cheng F, 2022, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V49, DOI 10.1029/2021GL097195
   Clements T, 2018, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V45, P6459, DOI 10.1029/2018GL077706
   Corell RW, 2006, AMBIO, V35, P148, DOI 10.1579/0044-7447(2006)35[148:COCCAA]2.0.CO;2
   Cox BR, 2012, J COLD REG ENG, V26, P118, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000041
   Daley TM., 2013, Lead. Edge, V32, P699, DOI DOI 10.1190/TLE32060699.1
   Döll P, 2012, J GEODYN, V59-60, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.jog.2011.05.001
   Dou S, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-11986-4
   Dou S, 2017, GEOPHYSICS, V82, pEN33, DOI 10.1190/GEO2016-0474.1
   Douglas Thomas A., 2021, Cryosphere, V15, P3555, DOI 10.5194/tc-15-3555-2021
   Dupuis JC, 2007, GEOPHYSICS, V72, pA81, DOI 10.1190/1.2773780
   Erler AR, 2019, WATER RESOUR RES, V55, P8142, DOI 10.1029/2018WR023822
   Evengard B, 2011, GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, V4, DOI 10.3402/gha.v4i0.8449
   Fores B, 2018, VADOSE ZONE J, V17, DOI 10.2136/vzj2017.09.0163
   Foti S, 2018, B EARTHQ ENG, V16, P2367, DOI 10.1007/s10518-017-0206-7
   Freifeld B.M., 2016, P 78 EAGE C EXHIBITI, P1
   Garambois S, 2019, GEOPHYS J INT, V219, P1636, DOI 10.1093/gji/ggz391
   Garambois S., 2019, Seg technical program expanded abstracts 2019, P4814
   Gassmann F., 1951, Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zurich, V96, P1
   Gaubert-Bastide T, 2022, WATER RESOUR RES, V58, DOI 10.1029/2021WR030680
   Hartzler A. L., 2018, Informatics for Health and Social Care, V43, P320, DOI 10.1080/17538157.2017.1297815
   HASHIN Z, 1963, J MECH PHYS SOLIDS, V11, P127, DOI 10.1016/0022-5096(63)90060-7
   He L., 2020, Monitoring seasonal variations in seismic velocity and groundwater levels in Harvey, western Australia using borehole ambient seismic noise interferometry
   Herrmann RB, 2013, SEISMOL RES LETT, V84, P1081, DOI 10.1785/0220110096
   HILL R, 1963, J MECH PHYS SOLIDS, V11, P357, DOI 10.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X
   Hillers G, 2015, GEOPHYS J INT, V202, P920, DOI 10.1093/gji/ggv151
   Hu KY, 2023, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V128, DOI 10.1029/2022JB025505
   Izbicki JA, 2000, J HYDROL, V238, P194, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00331-0
   Jacquemart M, 2021, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V21, P629, DOI 10.5194/nhess-21-629-2021
   Jamin P, 2020, HYDROGEOL J, V28, P869, DOI 10.1007/s10040-020-02108-y
   Ji KH, 2012, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V39, DOI 10.1029/2011GL050195
   Johannessen K., 2012, SPE intelligent energy international
   Kane D. L., 1978, Hydrologic properties of subarctic organic soils (Tech. Rep.)
   Kim D, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P13722, DOI 10.1029/2019GL084719
   King NE, 2007, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V112, DOI 10.1029/2006JB004448
   Kramer R, 2023, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V50, DOI 10.1029/2022GL101298
   Kurylyk BL, 2014, WATER RESOUR RES, V50, P3253, DOI 10.1002/2013WR014588
   Lamontagne-Hallé P, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aad404
   Lecocq T, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-14468-9
   Lesage P, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V119, P4360, DOI 10.1002/2013JB010884
   Li HL, 2001, ADV WATER RESOUR, V24, P565, DOI 10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00074-9
   Li Z, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V586, P827, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.061
   Lindsey NJ, 2021, ANNU REV EARTH PL SC, V49, P309, DOI 10.1146/10.1146/annurev-earth-072420-065213
   Linell K. A., 1973, International conference on permafrost, 2d, Yakutsk, Siberia
   Liu CY, 2020, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V125, DOI 10.1029/2020JB019524
   Lu ZQ, 2009, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V73, P1614, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2008.0073
   Luan Y, 2022, SEISMOL RES LETT, V93, P914, DOI 10.1785/0220210160
   Maina FZ, 2021, ADV WATER RESOUR, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.103978
   Maina FZ, 2018, WATER RESOUR RES, V54, P501, DOI 10.1002/2017WR021655
   Mao SJ, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-32194-3
   Mateeva A, 2014, GEOPHYS PROSPECT, V62, P679, DOI 10.1111/1365-2478.12116
   Mavko G., 2020, ROCK PHYS HDB
   Meier U, 2010, GEOPHYS J INT, V181, P985, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04550.x
   MICHEL FA, 1994, PERMAFROST PERIGLAC, V5, P191, DOI 10.1002/ppp.3430050308
   MILLER RD, 1989, GEOPHYSICS, V54, P1528, DOI 10.1190/1.1442620
   Mohamed A, 2017, GEOL SOC AM BULL, V129, P534, DOI [10.1130/B31460.1, 10.1130/b31460.1]
   Molenaar MM, 2012, SPE DRILL COMPLETION, V27, P32, DOI 10.2118/140561-PA
   Nakagawa K, 2019, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V78, DOI 10.1007/s12665-019-8473-z
   Nakashima Y, 2001, J APPL GEOPHYS, V47, P241, DOI 10.1016/S0926-9851(01)00068-4
   Oakley DOS, 2021, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V126, DOI 10.1029/2020JF005823
   Pan L, 2019, GEOPHYS J INT, V216, P1276, DOI 10.1093/gji/ggy479
   Park CB, 1999, GEOPHYSICS, V64, P800, DOI 10.1190/1.1444590
   Pounder E., 1965, The Physics of Ice, P116, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-1-4832-1353-8.50010-6
   Rawls W.J., 1992, P INT WORKSHOP INDIR, P329
   Rezaei A, 2019, J HYDROL, V579, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124196
   Richey AS, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P5217, DOI 10.1002/2015WR017349
   Richter T, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V119, P4747, DOI 10.1002/2013JB010695
   Rivet D, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P9563, DOI 10.1002/2016GL070410
   Rodell M, 2002, J HYDROL, V263, P245, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00060-4
   Romero-Ruiz A, 2021, VADOSE ZONE J, V20, DOI 10.1002/vzj2.20140
   Savage MK, 2013, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V40, P3556, DOI 10.1002/grl.50678
   Scanlon BR, 2002, METHODS SOIL ANAL 4, P643, DOI [10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c23, DOI 10.2136/SSSABOOKSER5.4.C23]
   Seipel L. C., 2016, Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, V4, P43, DOI [10.4236/gep.2016.45005, DOI 10.4236/GEP.2016.45005]
   Sens-Schönfelder C, 2006, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V33, DOI 10.1029/2006GL027797
   Sepaskhah Ali Reza, 2010, Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, V56, P325, DOI 10.1080/03650340903099676
   Sharratt B., 1990, Water Retention, Bulk Density, Particle Size, and Thermal and Hydraulic Conductivity of Arable Soils in Interior Alaska
   Shulski M., 2007, The climate of Alaska
   Silverii F, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V121, P8315, DOI 10.1002/2016JB013361
   Snieder R, 2002, SCIENCE, V295, P2253, DOI 10.1126/science.1070015
   Stevens D., 2015, Guidebook to permafrost and quaternary geology of the Fairbanks area, DOI [10.14509/29566, DOI 10.14509/29566]
   Suzuki R, 2021, EARTH PLANETS SPACE, V73, DOI 10.1186/s40623-021-01484-3
   Taruselli M., 2020, Nsg2020 26th european meeting of environmental and engineering geophysics, V2020, P1
   Taylor C. J., 2002, Groundwaterlevel monitoring and the importance of longterm waterlevel data (No. 12172002)
   Tomar G, 2018, GEOPHYS J INT, V214, P122, DOI 10.1093/gji/ggy122
   Tribaldos VR, 2021, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V126, DOI 10.1029/2020JB021004
   Tsai VC, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V116, DOI 10.1029/2010JB008156
   Vantassel JP, 2022, J APPL GEOPHYS, V205, DOI 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.104776
   Vogt C, 2008, J ACOUST SOC AM, V124, P3613, DOI 10.1121/1.2996304
   Voisin C., 2017, Journal of Water Resource and Protection, V9, P1414, DOI 10.4236/jwarp.2017.912091
   Voisin C, 2016, INTERPRETATION-J SUB, V4, pSJ67, DOI 10.1190/INT-2016-0010.1
   Wagner A, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-28111-8
   Wagner Anna M., 2013, Permafrost Ecosystem Warming Prototype: Installation, Operation, and Initial Site Characterization
   Walvoord MA, 2007, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V34, DOI 10.1029/2007GL030216
   Wang XJ, 2012, WATER RESOUR RES, V48, DOI 10.1029/2011WR011600
   Wathelet M, 2004, NEAR SURF GEOPHYS, V2, P211, DOI 10.3997/1873-0604.2004018
   Willis M. E., 2022, Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Seismic MeasurementsWhat Geophysicists and Engineers Need to Know
   Xia JH, 2003, J APPL GEOPHYS, V52, P45, DOI 10.1016/S0926-9851(02)00239-2
   Xia JH, 1999, GEOPHYSICS, V64, P691, DOI 10.1190/1.1444578
   Xiao H, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V648, P1002, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.199
   Yang ZF, 2020, IEEE GEOSC REM SEN M, V8, P71, DOI 10.1109/MGRS.2019.2954824
   Zhang Y, 2008, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V35, DOI 10.1029/2007GL032117
NR 127
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 36
U2 36
PU AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
PI WASHINGTON
PA 2000 FLORIDA AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20009 USA
SN 0043-1397
EI 1944-7973
J9 WATER RESOUR RES
JI Water Resour. Res.
PD AUG
PY 2024
VL 60
IS 8
AR e2023WR036172
DI 10.1029/2023WR036172
PG 19
WC Environmental Sciences; Limnology; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Marine & Freshwater Biology; Water
   Resources
GA A2X3Z
UT WOS:001281206900001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Epule, TE
   Poirier, V
   Peng, CH
   Etongo, D
AF Epule, Terence Epule
   Poirier, Vincent
   Peng, Changhui
   Etongo, Daniel
TI Vulnerability of barley yields in Québec
SO ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Vulnerability; Exposure; Sensitivity; Adaptive capacity; Barley; Qu &
   eacute;bec
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; SOUTHERN QUEBEC; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; ADAPTIVE
   CAPACITY; FUTURE CLIMATE; CO2 INCREASE; ADAPTATION; IMPACTS;
   VARIABILITY; CANADA
AB Climate projections across Qu & eacute;bec indicate increased water stress and recurrent vulnerability of cropping systems. In recent years, reports of droughts and water stress have been recorded across the province. Many parts of Qu & eacute;bec have experienced droughts in the past few years, which have had uninvestigated impacts on crops. These droughts have been described as some of the most significant in the last 80 years. On the positive side, climate change is likely to trigger shorter winters and therefore longer growing seasons for several crops. However, for crops like maple syrup, the regions suitable for their cultivation will shift northwards. Despite these projections, studies monitoring the susceptibility of barley to environmental changes, climate variability, and adaptive capacity across Qu & eacute;bec are still limited. This study aims to provide a provincial-scale portrait of vulnerability of barley in Qu & eacute;bec based on historical growing season precipitation, barley yield, and socioeconomic data (literacy and poverty rates) using a composite statistical model. Growing season precipitation data were downloaded from Ouranos. Barley yield data were collected from the Institut de la Statistique du Qu & eacute;bec, and the socio-demographic data were collected from the Advisory Council of Poverty and the Institut de la Statistique du Qu & eacute;bec. A vulnerability index with sub-indices (sensitivity, exposure, and adaptive capacity) is deployed. It is hypothesised that (1) vulnerability is inversely associated with adaptive capacity, and (2) the peripheral regions of Qu & eacute;bec are more vulnerable and less adaptive to climate stressors. Initial results show that when the vulnerability index for barley is more prominent, the associated index of adaptive capacity is relatively lower. A significant gradient between the peripheral and southern regions of Qu & eacute;bec is observed, with vulnerability lowest around Montreal/Laval and gradually increasing towards the peripheral regions. A better understanding of vulnerability warrants a change in approach from focusing solely on climate-related variables to integrating socioeconomic proxies. The challenge, however, has been how to introduce these socioeconomic proxies into empirical and process-based crop models.
C1 [Epule, Terence Epule; Poirier, Vincent] Univ Quebec Abitibi Temiscamingue UQAT, Un Rech & Dev Agr Agroalimentaire & Abitibi Temisc, 79 Rue Cote, Notre Dame du Nord, PQ J0Z 3B0, Canada.
   [Peng, Changhui] Univ Quebec Montreal UQAM, Inst Sci Environm, Dept Sci Biol, Montreal, PQ, Canada.
   [Etongo, Daniel] Univ Seychelles, James Michel Blue Econ Res Inst, Victoria, Seychelles.
   [Etongo, Daniel] Univ Seychelles, Dept Environm Sci, Victoria, Seychelles.
C3 University of Quebec; University of Quebec Montreal
RP Epule, TE (corresponding author), Univ Quebec Abitibi Temiscamingue UQAT, Un Rech & Dev Agr Agroalimentaire & Abitibi Temisc, 79 Rue Cote, Notre Dame du Nord, PQ J0Z 3B0, Canada.
EM terenceepule.epule@uqat.ca; Vincent.Poirier@uqat.ca;
   Peng.Changhui@uqam.ca; Daniel.Etongo@unisey.ac.sc
RI Peng, Changhui/JQJ-4339-2023
FU Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Societe et Culture (FRQSC); Ministere de
   l'Environnement, de la Lutte contre les change-ments climatiques, de la
   Faune et des Parcs (MELCCFP) of Quebec; Fonds de recherche du Quebec -
   Sante (FRQS) [2024-0CAR-341095]; Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Nature
   et technologies(FRQNT) [2024-0CAR-341095]; Ouranos [2024-0CAR-341095]
FX This work is funded by Le Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Societe et
   Culture (FRQSC) and its partners (Le Ministere de l'Environnement, de la
   Lutte contre les change-ments climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs
   (MELCCFP) of Quebec, Le Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Sante (FRQS), Le
   Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Nature et technologies(FRQNT) and
   Ouranos) under the concerted actions programme within the auspices of
   the project titled "Pan Quebec Economic Impacts of Climate Change on
   Agriculture and Adaptation (PQEICCAA)" grant number 2024-0CAR-341095.
CR Achli S, 2024, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V15, P1588, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2024.498
   Alexandrov VA, 2000, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V67, P45, DOI 10.1007/s007040070015
   Almaraz JJ, 2008, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V88, P187, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9408-y
   [Anonymous], 2022, Climate change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
   Beckie HJ, 2006, CAN J PLANT SCI, V86, P1243, DOI 10.4141/P05-193
   Bissonnette JF, 2017, SMALL-SCALE FOR, V16, P367, DOI 10.1007/s11842-016-9361-y
   Bonsal BR, 2001, J CLIMATE, V14, P1959, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<1959:CODAET>2.0.CO;2
   Bootsma A., 2004, Technical Bulletin ECORC Contribution No. 03-284
   Brassard JP, 2007, CLIM RES, V34, P105, DOI 10.3354/cr034105
   Brassard JP, 2008, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V13, P241, DOI 10.1007/s11027-007-9109-2
   Breton M.-P, 2017, CLIMATE RISKS ADAPTA, P181
   Bryant C., 2007, Farming in a changing climate: agricultural adaptation in Canada, P142
   Bryant CR, 2000, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V45, P181, DOI 10.1023/A:1005653320241
   Budreau D., 2007, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, V12, P1305, DOI 10.1007/s11027-006-9053-6
   Burton I, 1997, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V36, P185, DOI 10.1023/A:1005334926618
   [Carter T.R. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)], 1994, IPCC SPECIAL REPORT
   Changnon SA, 2003, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V58, P109, DOI 10.1023/A:1023411401144
   Chiotti Q., 2008, Human Health in a Changing Climate, V368
   De Jong R., 2001, Final Report for Climate Change Action Fund Project A080
   EASTERLING WE, 1993, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V24, P23, DOI 10.1007/BF01091476
   Easterling WE, 2003, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V60, P149, DOI 10.1023/A:1026023712494
   El-Shaer H.M., 1997, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V1, P233, DOI [10.1007/BF00517805, DOI 10.1007/BF00517805]
   ElMaayar M, 1997, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V85, P193, DOI 10.1016/S0168-1923(96)02404-5
   Epule T. E., 2024, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, P1
   Epule TE, 2024, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V15, P499, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2024.447
   Epule TE, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V149, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103561
   Epule TE, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0252335
   Epule TE, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9030181
   Fila D, 2023, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, DOI 10.1007/s10668-023-02999-3
   FISCHER G, 1995, ASA SPEC P, P341
   Hadarits M, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P1515, DOI 10.1007/s10113-017-1111-y
   Halofsky JE, 2018, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V421, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.02.037
   Institut de la statistique du Quebec (ISQ), 2023, Superficie des grandes cultures, rendement a l'hectare et production, par regroupement de regions administratives, Quebec, 2007-2023
   Kelly PM, 2000, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V47, P325, DOI 10.1023/A:1005627828199
   Lazurko A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9071237
   Li GL, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V148, P249, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2199-x
   Mendelsohn R, 2000, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V45, P583, DOI 10.1023/A:1005507810350
   Nand V, 2023, IRRIG DRAIN, V72, P1165, DOI 10.1002/ird.2840
   Ouranos, 2023, Climate portraits
   Parry M., 2007, Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change
   Reid S., 2007, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, V12, P609, DOI 10.1007/s11027-006-9051-8
   Reilly J, 2003, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V57, P43, DOI 10.1023/A:1022103315424
   Sabio RP, 2023, RENEW AGR FOOD SYST, V38, DOI 10.1017/S1742170523000170
   Salinger M, 2005, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V70, P9, DOI 10.1007/s10584-005-5936-x
   Sánchez-Pinillos M, 2022, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V28, P542, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15913
   Sherman M, 2016, FOOD SECUR, V8, P551, DOI 10.1007/s12571-016-0583-9
   Simpson NP, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, P937, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-01171-x
   SINGH B, 1991, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V35, P327, DOI 10.1016/0167-8809(91)90082-9
   Singh B, 1998, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V38, P51, DOI 10.1023/A:1005392517715
   Singh B, 1996, ATMOS OCEAN, V34, P379, DOI 10.1080/07055900.1996.9649569
   Smit B., 2003, CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPT, P9, DOI DOI 10.1142/97818609458160002
   Smit B, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008
   Smit B, 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P877
   Statista, 2023, Percentage of Quebec's population in low income from 2000-2021
   Tol RSJ, 1998, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V8, P109, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(98)00004-1
   Vincent K, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.009
   Vincent L. A., 2019, Data, Models and Analysis, P61
   Waldick R, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P187, DOI 10.1007/s10113-016-0992-5
   Weber M, 2003, CAN PUBLIC POL, V29, P163, DOI 10.2307/3552453
   Yohe G, 2000, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V46, P371, DOI 10.1023/A:1005659629316
   Zhang XB, 2000, ATMOS OCEAN, V38, P395, DOI 10.1080/07055900.2000.9649654
   Zhou X, 2018, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V144, P588, DOI 10.1002/qj.3231
NR 62
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 2
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 0167-6369
EI 1573-2959
J9 ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS
JI Environ. Monit. Assess.
PD SEP
PY 2024
VL 196
IS 9
AR 850
DI 10.1007/s10661-024-13036-9
PG 16
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA E0O2P
UT WOS:001300079500004
PM 39192137
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Daraz, U
   Khan, Y
   Alsawalqa, RO
   Alrawashdeh, MN
   Alnajdawi, AM
AF Daraz, Umar
   Khan, Younas
   Alsawalqa, Rula Odeh
   Alrawashdeh, Maissa N.
   Alnajdawi, Ann Mousa
TI Impact of climate change on women mental health in rural hinterland of
   Pakistan
SO FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; rural women; mental health; community dynamics; social
   support; education; food security
ID STRESS
AB Background: Climate change significantly impacts global well-being, with rural and agricultural communities, particularly women, bearing a disproportionate burden. In Pakistan's Malakand Division, women face increased mental health challenges due to environmental stressors such as temperature rise, extreme weather, and environmental degradation. These stressors are expected to exacerbate issues like stress, anxiety, and depression. Understanding their effects on rural women's mental health is crucial for developing effective intervention strategies. Methodology: This study employs quantitative methodologies to assess the impact of climate change on the mental health of rural women in Malakand Division, focusing on Dir Upper, Dir Lower, and Shangla districts. A cross-sectional design was used, with a sample size of 600 women selected through multistage cluster sampling for geographic representation. Data were collected using structured questionnaires addressing stress, anxiety, and community dynamics. Data were analyzed using multiple regression, structural equation modeling (SEM), ANOVA, and logistic regression. Results: The results revealed that climate change factors-temperature increase (beta = 0.42, p < 0.01), extreme weather events (beta = 0.36, p < 0.01), precipitation changes (beta = 0.31, p < 0.05), and environmental degradation (beta = 0.28, p < 0.05)-significantly impacted rural women's mental health. High levels of stress (72%), anxiety (68%), and depression (56%) were reported. Social support (beta = -0.45, p < 0.01), community cohesion (beta = -0.37, p < 0.05), access to resources (beta = -0.39, p < 0.01), and cultural norms (beta = -0.33, p < 0.05) were key factors mitigating the effects of climate stress. Gender disparities were evident, with women showing higher mental health challenges compared to men in similar conditions. Conclusion: The study concludes that climate change significantly exacerbates mental health issues for rural women. It highlights the need for gender-sensitive, community-based interventions that address both climate adaptation and mental health. Strengthening community resilience, improving access to resources, and investing in healthcare and education are vital for enhancing well-being in the face of climate change.
C1 [Daraz, Umar] Univ Malakand Chakddara, Dept Sociol, Chakdara, Khyber Pukhtunk, Pakistan.
   [Khan, Younas] Kohat Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Sociol, Kohat, Pakistan.
   [Alsawalqa, Rula Odeh] Univ Jordan, Dept Sociol, Aljubeiha, Jordan.
   [Alrawashdeh, Maissa N.; Alnajdawi, Ann Mousa] Univ Jordan, Dept Social Work, Aljubeiha, Jordan.
RP Khan, Y (corresponding author), Kohat Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Sociol, Kohat, Pakistan.
EM younaskhan@kust.edu.pk
CR Ahmed S, 2021, LOCAL ENVIRON, V26, P650, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2021.1916901
   Ajibade I, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1714, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.009
   Alam M, 2024, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, DOI 10.1007/s10668-024-04636-z
   Ashrafuzzaman M, 2022, CLIMATE, V10, DOI 10.3390/cli10110172
   Barrable A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12010375
   Batterham PJ, 2022, AUST J RURAL HEALTH, V30, P306, DOI 10.1111/ajr.12851
   Bell K, 2010, SOC SCI MED, V70, P795, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.060
   Benevolenza MA, 2019, J HUM BEHAV SOC ENVI, V29, P266, DOI 10.1080/10911359.2018.1527739
   Braveman P., 2023, The Social Determinants of Health and Health Disparities
   Bronfenbrenner U., 1979, ECOLOGY HUMAN DEV EX, P330
   Chique C, 2021, INT J HYG ENVIR HEAL, V238, DOI 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113840
   Cianconi P, 2020, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00074
   Clayton S, 2020, J ANXIETY DISORD, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102263
   COHEN S, 1985, PSYCHOL BULL, V98, P310, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
   Crandon TJ, 2022, NAT HUM BEHAV, V6, P1474, DOI 10.1038/s41562-022-01477-6
   Dhimal M, 2021, FRONT PHYSIOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fphys.2021.651189
   Di Nicola M, 2020, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00095
   Eriksson M, 2011, GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, V4, DOI 10.3402/gha.v4i0.5611
   Field A., 2013, DISCOVERING STAT USI, V4th ed.
   Fritze Jessica G, 2008, Int J Ment Health Syst, V2, P13, DOI 10.1186/1752-4458-2-13
   Gulliford Martin, 2002, J Health Serv Res Policy, V7, P186, DOI 10.1258/135581902760082517
   Hagen BNM, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0225661
   Hayes K, 2018, INT J MENT HEALTH SY, V12, DOI 10.1186/s13033-018-0210-6
   Hrabok M, 2020, J ANXIETY DISORD, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102295
   Jarrett J, 2024, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102326
   Jones-Bitton A, 2020, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V55, P229, DOI 10.1007/s00127-019-01738-2
   Kabeer N., 2024, Renegotiating Patriarchy: Gender, Agency and the Bangladesh Paradox
   Kaniasty K, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V32, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.026
   Kawachi I, 2001, J URBAN HEALTH, V78, P458, DOI 10.1093/jurban/78.3.458
   Khan MM., 2022, Disaster and Gender in Coastal Bangladesh
   Khan Y, 2024, ECON CHANG RESTRUCT, V57, DOI 10.1007/s10644-024-09679-w
   Khan Younas, 2022, African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, V22, P21186, DOI 10.18697/ajfand.113.21530
   Kori DS, 2023, FRONT PSYCHOL, V14, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1067879
   Lawrance EL, 2022, INT REV PSYCHIATR, V34, P443, DOI 10.1080/09540261.2022.2128725
   Lazarus R., 1984, Stress, appraisal, and coping
   Lecoutere E, 2023, FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S, V7, DOI 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1197809
   Lee S, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V616, P688, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.260
   Leichenko R., 2024, Climate and society: Transforming the future
   LOVIBOND PF, 1995, BEHAV RES THER, V33, P335, DOI 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U
   Manzo LC, 2006, J PLAN LIT, V20, P335, DOI 10.1177/0885412205286160
   Masson-Delmotte V, 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE 2021, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009157896
   Mezzina R, 2022, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V13, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.894370
   Monsour M, 2022, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V300, P430, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.124
   Nadeem F, 2022, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V22, DOI 10.1007/s10113-022-01918-y
   Organization WH., 2014, Gender, climate change and health
   Otten D, 2021, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.553071
   Patel V, 1999, SOC SCI MED, V49, P1461, DOI 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00208-7
   PEARLIN LI, 1981, J HEALTH SOC BEHAV, V22, P337, DOI 10.2307/2136676
   Rugel EJ, 2019, ENVIRON RES, V171, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.034
   Sharpe I, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19052896
   Singh RK, 2020, ENVIRON MANAGE, V66, P826, DOI 10.1007/s00267-020-01345-x
   Sippel LM, 2015, ECOL SOC, V20, DOI 10.5751/ES-07832-200410
   Spencer S, 2022, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.785254
   Steiner JL, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V146, P201, DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-1965-5
   Stephens Christine., 2008, Health Promotion: A Psychosocial Approach
   Stone K, 2022, CURR ENV HLTH REP, V9, P228, DOI 10.1007/s40572-022-00346-8
   Thoma MV, 2021, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.675936
   Thompson R, 2018, PUBLIC HEALTH, V161, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.06.008
   Tota M, 2024, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V15, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1389051
   Tronto JC., 2023, From crisis to catastrophe: Care, COVID, and pathways to change
   Wallerstein NB, 2011, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V101, P822, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2008.140988
   Wang XC, 2024, DIGIT HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.1177/20552076241239246
   Weathers F. W., 2013, The PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
   Wei QG, 2022, HEALTH SOC CARE COMM, V30, pE6414, DOI 10.1111/hsc.14084
   Whaley AL, 2007, AM PSYCHOL, V62, P563, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.62.6.563
   White Bradley Patrick, 2023, Ann Glob Health, V89, P66, DOI 10.5334/aogh.4105
   Woodland Lisa, 2023, Int J Environ Res Public Health, V20, DOI 10.3390/ijerph20085563
   Zhou SB, 2023, J RURAL STUD, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103166
   ZIMET GD, 1988, J PERS ASSESS, V52, P30, DOI 10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
NR 69
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
SN 1664-0640
J9 FRONT PSYCHIATRY
JI Front. Psychiatry
PD DEC 12
PY 2024
VL 15
AR 1450943
DI 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1450943
PG 26
WC Psychiatry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Psychiatry
GA Q5B5R
UT WOS:001384834100001
PM 39735428
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Colaninno, N
   Basu, R
   Hosseini, M
   Alhassan, A
   Liu, L
   Sevtsuk, A
AF Colaninno, Nicola
   Basu, Rounaq
   Hosseini, Maryam
   Alhassan, Abdulaziz
   Liu, Liu
   Sevtsuk, Andres
TI A sidewalk-level urban heat risk assessment framework using pedestrian
   mobility and urban microclimate modeling
SO ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Urban heat; pedestrian mobility; heat risk assessment; climate-proof
   planning; resilient cities
ID MEAN RADIANT TEMPERATURE; WEATHER CONDITIONS; IMPACT; CHOICE
AB Climate change and the associated increase in heat-related hazards pose a pressing threat to urban residents' health and well-being. People, when walking in particular, are at risk of experiencing heat stress as they navigate urban environments. This study proposes a novel heat risk assessment framework combining pedestrian mobility modeling with urban microclimate modeling. Using this framework, we assessed pedestrian heat-related exposure and risk in urban areas by integrating the Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI) as the hazard and pedestrian trips to critical destinations as exposure. We considered temporal variation, in both hazard and exposure, by examining different time periods during the day-morning peak, midday, and evening peak. In addition to hazard and exposure, we also considered vulnerability by focusing on young children and older adults. We contribute to improving the spatial resolution of heat risk assessment by analyzing the hazard for pedestrian trips between home locations and five critical destinations-bus stops, rail stations, parks, schools, and commercial amenities-at the address-point level and using a pedestrian network comprising sidewalks and crosswalks. Our framework helps identify sidewalks with high heat exposure levels as well as home locations with high cumulative heat risk, accounting for walking trips to critical destinations along feasible routes. We demonstrated the effectiveness of this framework by applying it to a 36-square-kilometer area of central Los Angeles, CA. Our findings offer valuable information to urban planners and policy-makers, supporting evidence-based prioritization of intervention sites, climate adaptation strategies, and policy decisions essential for climate-proof planning. By implementing targeted interventions in areas where heat hazard is expected to affect the most vulnerable pedestrians, planners can create heat-resilient, pedestrian-friendly environments while prioritizing the health and well-being of vulnerable groups. This study contributes to the growing knowledge of robust risk assessment methodologies for climate-proof planning, specifically with regard to addressing outdoor heat-related risks during extreme heat events.
C1 [Colaninno, Nicola] Polytech Univ Milan, Milan, Italy.
   [Colaninno, Nicola; Basu, Rounaq] MIT, Dept Urban Studies & Planning, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.
   [Basu, Rounaq] Boston Reg Metropolitan Planning Org, Boston, MA USA.
   [Alhassan, Abdulaziz] MIT, Computat Sci & Engn Civil & Environm Engn, Cambridge, MA USA.
   [Liu, Liu] MIT, Cambridge, MA USA.
   [Sevtsuk, Andres] MIT, Urban Sci & Planning, Cambridge, MA USA.
C3 Polytechnic University of Milan; Massachusetts Institute of Technology
   (MIT); Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); Massachusetts
   Institute of Technology (MIT); Massachusetts Institute of Technology
   (MIT)
RP Colaninno, N (corresponding author), Politecn Milan, Dept Architecture & Urban Studies, Via Edoardo Bonardi,3, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
EM nicola.colaninno@polimi.it
RI Sevtsuk, Andres/JMI-1024-2023; Colaninno, Nicola/KLZ-6488-2024; Basu,
   Rounaq/AAL-6246-2020; Colaninno, Nicola/M-7333-2017
OI sevtsuk, andres/0000-0001-5098-9636; Colaninno,
   Nicola/0000-0003-4428-639X; Basu, Rounaq/0000-0001-5077-2613; Hosseini,
   Maryam/0000-0002-4088-810X
FU European Union [101028035]; Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [101028035]
   Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
FX The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for
   the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This
   research was supported by the project Multi CAST-Multiscale Thermal
   related Urban Climate Analysis and Simulation Tool, which received
   funding from the European Union's Horizon2020 (H2020) Research and
   Innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Action-Individual
   Fellowship-Global Fellowship (MSCA-IF-GF), with grant agreement number
   101028035.
CR Alhassan A., 2024, SSRN, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.4748255, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.4748255]
   Amorim-Maia AT, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101053
   Åström DO, 2011, MATURITAS, V69, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.03.008
   Basu R, 2022, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V163, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2022.06.007
   de Montigny L, 2012, ENVIRON BEHAV, V44, P821, DOI 10.1177/0013916511409033
   Ebi KL, 2021, LANCET, V398, P698, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01208-3
   Fiack D, 2021, CITIES, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103235
   Fiala D, 2012, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V56, P429, DOI 10.1007/s00484-011-0424-7
   Fitzgerald J, 2022, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V88, P508, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2021.2013301
   Gebhart K, 2014, TRANSPORTATION, V41, P1205, DOI 10.1007/s11116-014-9540-7
   Harlan SL, 2006, SOC SCI MED, V63, P2847, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.030
   Heaviside Clare, 2017, Curr Environ Health Rep, V4, P296, DOI 10.1007/s40572-017-0150-3
   Hersbach H, 2020, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V146, P1999, DOI 10.1002/qj.3803
   Hosseini M, 2023, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2023.101950
   Hsu A, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22799-5
   Jendritzky G, 2012, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V56, P421, DOI 10.1007/s00484-011-0513-7
   Jiao DL, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-97432-y
   Karner A, 2015, J TRANSP HEALTH, V2, P451, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2015.10.001
   Klinenberg E., 2001, ETHNOGRAPHY, V2, P501, DOI 10.1177/14661380122231019
   Klinenberg E., 2015, Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago
   Lindberg F, 2008, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V52, P697, DOI 10.1007/s00484-008-0162-7
   Lindberg F, 2018, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V99, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.09.020
   Liu LLJ, 2023, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V67, P2055, DOI 10.1007/s00484-023-02562-9
   McDonald RI, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0249715
   McNicholl B, 2022, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V19, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2021.3137643
   Melnikov VR, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-06383-5
   Napoli C., 2021, Applications of the Universal Thermal Climate Index UTCI in Biometeorology, P193, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-76716-7_10
   Oke T. R., 2017, Urban Climates, DOI [10.1017/9781139016476, DOI 10.1017/9781139016476]
   Pachauri R.K., 2016, Climate Health Risks in Megacities, P47
   Reid CE, 2009, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V117, P1730, DOI 10.1289/ehp.0900683
   Ross R., 2022, Effects of Heat Waves on Population Health: The Challenges Facing Socioeconomically Vulnerable Groups Living in Urban Areas across Washington State. Center for Health Innovation and Policy Science
   Saneinejad S, 2012, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V17, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2011.09.005
   Sangiorgio V, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-75018-4
   Sarrat C, 2006, ATMOS ENVIRON, V40, P1743, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.11.037
   Sevtsuk A., 2012, INT J GEOMATICS SPAT, V22, P287, DOI [10.3166/rig.22.287-305, DOI 10.3166/RIG.22.287-305]
   Sevtsuk A, 2022, J TRANSP GEOGR, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103392
   Sevtsuk A, 2021, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V25, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.05.010
   Sheikh WT, 2022, CITIES, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103972
   StreetLight Data Inc a (nd-a), Solutions: AADT average annual daily traffic counts data
   StreetLight Data Inc b, Solutions: bike pedestrian big data traffic analytics - StreetLight data
   Thorsson S, 2017, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V61, P1531, DOI 10.1007/s00484-017-1332-2
   Thorsson S, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V10, P332, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2014.01.004
   UN-DESA, 2018, 68% of the World Population Projected to Live in Urban Areas by 2050
   Wu JW, 2020, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V135, P264, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2020.03.020
NR 44
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 16
U2 16
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 2399-8083
EI 2399-8091
J9 ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN
JI Env. Plan. B-Urban Anal. City Sci.
PD 2024 SEP 8
PY 2024
DI 10.1177/23998083241280746
EA SEP 2024
PG 20
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban
   Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration;
   Urban Studies
GA F2T9G
UT WOS:001308410400001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Frost, L
   Santamaría-Aguilar, DA
   Singletary, D
   Lagomarsino, LP
AF Frost, Laura
   Santamaria-Aguilar, Daniel A.
   Singletary, Daisy
   Lagomarsino, Laura P.
TI Neotropical niche evolution of <i>Otoba</i> trees in the context of
   global biogeography of the nutmeg family
SO JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
LA English
DT Article
DE Boreotropics; climatic niche; dispersal; herbariomics; Magnoliales;
   Myristicaceae; Neotropics; phylogenetic comparative methods;
   phylogenomics
ID MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY; DISPERSAL
   LIMITATION; CONTINENTAL-SCALE; SEED DISPERSAL; ANDEAN UPLIFT;
   MYRISTICACEAE; DIVERSITY; FORESTS; ANNONACEAE
AB Aim Plant distributions are influenced by species' ability to colonize new areas via long-distance dispersal and propensity to adapt to new environments via niche evolution. We use otobas, a clade of ecologically dominant trees found in low-to mid-elevation wet forests, as a system to understand the relative importance of these processes within the Neotropics. Location Neotropics and global. Taxon Otoba and entire Myristicaceae. Methods We resolve the first phylogeny of Otoba the Angiosperms353 loci and plastome sequences from 13 accessions representing seven species. We pair this with the most densely sampled phylogeny of Myristicaceae to date, inferred using publicly available plastid data. We then use environmental niche modelling, biogeographical reconstruction, phylogenetic principle components analysis and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models to infer biogeography and examine patterns of niche evolution. Results Myristicaceae has an Old World origin, with a single expansion into the Americas. Divergence dates, fossil evidence and a notable lack of long-distance dispersal are consistent with a Boreotropical origin of Neotropical Myristicaceae. Mirroring the rarity of dispersal at the family level, Otoba's biogeography is marked by few biogeographical events: two expansions into Central America from a South American ancestor and a single dispersal event across the Andes. This limited movement contrasts with rapid climatic niche evolution, typically occurring across geographically proximate habitats. Main conclusion Contrasting with previous studies, long-distance dispersal does not need to be invoked to explain the pantropical distribution of Myristicaceae, nor the biogeography of Otoba. This likely results from the family's relatively large seeds that are dispersed by large-bodied vertebrates. Instead, rapid niche evolution in Otoba has facilitated its occurrence throughout mesic habitats of the northern Neotropics, including the Amazon rainforest and Andean montane forests. Otoba adds to a growing group of Neotropical plant clades in which climate adaptation following local migration is common, implying an important role of niche evolution in the assembly of the Neotropical flora.
C1 [Frost, Laura; Santamaria-Aguilar, Daniel A.; Singletary, Daisy; Lagomarsino, Laura P.] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Shirley C Tucker Herbarium, Baton Rouge, LA 70808 USA.
C3 Louisiana State University System; Louisiana State University
RP Lagomarsino, LP (corresponding author), Louisiana State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Shirley C Tucker Herbarium, Baton Rouge, LA 70808 USA.
EM llagomarsino1@lsu.edu
RI Lagomarsino, Laura/GPT-5135-2022; Lagomarsino, Laura/K-9048-2016
OI Lagomarsino, Laura/0000-0003-4537-0761
FU Louisiana Board of Regents; LSU Department of Biological Sciences
FX Louisiana Board of Regents; LSU Department of Biological Sciences
CR [Anonymous], 2004, FLORA ECUADOR
   Antonelli A, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P6034, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1713819115
   Antonelli A, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P9749, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0811421106
   Azuma H, 2001, AM J BOT, V88, P2275, DOI 10.2307/3558389
   Bacon CD, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P6110, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1423853112
   Bemmels JB, 2018, ECOGRAPHY, V41, P1763, DOI 10.1111/ecog.03473
   Bolger AM, 2014, BIOINFORMATICS, V30, P2114, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
   Borowiec ML, 2016, PEERJ, V4, DOI 10.7717/peerj.1660
   Bouckaert R, 2019, PLOS COMPUT BIOL, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006650
   Brewer GE, 2019, FRONT PLANT SCI, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2019.01102
   Capella-Gutiérrez S, 2009, BIOINFORMATICS, V25, P1972, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348
   Carpenter EJ, 2019, GIGASCIENCE, V8, DOI 10.1093/gigascience/giz126
   Cavender-Bares J, 2019, NEW PHYTOL, V221, P669, DOI 10.1111/nph.15450
   Clark K, 2016, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V44, pD67, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkv1276
   De Candolle A., 1856, PRODROMUS SYSTEMATIS, V14, P187
   Dick CW, 2013, ECOL EVOL, V3, P162, DOI 10.1002/ece3.441
   Donoghue MJ, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P11549, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0801962105
   Donoghue MJ, 2019, AM J BOT, V106, P327, DOI 10.1002/ajb2.1255
   Donoghue MJ, 2014, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V45, P547, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091905
   Doyle JA, 2004, INT J PLANT SCI, V165, pS55, DOI 10.1086/421068
   Doyle JA, 2008, SYST BOT, V33, P636, DOI 10.1600/036364408786500217
   Edgar RC, 2004, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V32, P1792, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkh340
   Edwards EJ, 2013, J EXP BOT, V64, P4047, DOI 10.1093/jxb/ert220
   Esquivel-Muelbert A, 2017, ECOGRAPHY, V40, P618, DOI 10.1111/ecog.01904
   Faircloth BC, 2016, BIOINFORMATICS, V32, P786, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv646
   Fick S. E., 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P4302, DOI [DOI 10.1002/joc.5086, DOI 10.1002/JOC.5086]
   Fine PVA, 2016, BIOTROPICA, V48, P24, DOI 10.1111/btp.12301
   Garzione CN, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P1304, DOI 10.1126/science.1148615
   Garzione CN, 2017, ANNU REV EARTH PL SC, V45, P529, DOI 10.1146/annurev-earth-063016-020612
   Giraldo Paula, 2007, Neotropical Primates, V14, P55, DOI 10.1896/044.014.0202
   Goodwin ZA, 2015, CURR BIOL, V25, pR1066, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.002
   Andino JEG, 2017, ECOL EVOL, V7, P9639, DOI 10.1002/ece3.3481
   Hale H, 2020, APPL PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.1002/aps3.11337
   Hijmans R. J., 2015, R PACKAGE
   HOLT RD, 1992, EVOL ECOL, V6, P433, DOI 10.1007/BF02270702
   Hoorn C, 2010, SCIENCE, V330, P927, DOI 10.1126/science.1194585
   Hughes C, 2006, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V103, P10334, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0601928103
   Hughes CE, 2016, NEW PHYTOL, V210, P1152, DOI 10.1111/nph.13958
   Hughes CE, 2013, BOT J LINN SOC, V171, P1, DOI 10.1111/boj.12006
   Jantzen JR, 2020, APPL PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.1002/aps3.11345
   Jaramillo-Vivanco TS, 2020, PHYTOTAXA, V441, P143, DOI 10.11646/phytotaxa.441.2.3
   Johnson M.G., 2016, Appl. Plant Sci., V4, DOI DOI 10.3732/APPS.1600016
   Johnson MG, 2019, SYST BIOL, V68, P594, DOI 10.1093/sysbio/syy086
   Katoh Kazutaka, 2013, Mol Biol Evol, V30, P772, DOI 10.1093/molbev/mst010
   Khabbazian M, 2016, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V7, P811, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12534
   Lagomarsino LP, 2016, NEW PHYTOL, V210, P1430, DOI 10.1111/nph.13920
   Lanfear R, 2017, MOL BIOL EVOL, V34, P772, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msw260
   Larsson A, 2014, BIOINFORMATICS, V30, P3276, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu531
   LAVIN M, 1993, AM J BOT, V80, P1, DOI 10.2307/2445114
   Leebens-Mack JH, 2019, NATURE, V574, P679, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1693-2
   Macia MJ, 2008, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V17, P2671, DOI 10.1007/s10531-008-9348-x
   Madrinan Santiago, 2013, Frontiers in Genetics, V4, P192, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2013.00192
   Magallón S, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V207, P437, DOI 10.1111/nph.13264
   Malhi Y., 2021, EVOLUTIONARY ASSEMBL, DOI [10.1101/2020.12.22.424032, DOI 10.1101/2020.12.22.424032]
   Martínez C, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aaz4724
   Massoni J, 2015, BMC EVOL BIOL, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12862-015-0320-6
   Massoni J, 2014, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V70, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.09.010
   Matzke NJ, 2014, SYST BIOL, V63, P951, DOI 10.1093/sysbio/syu056
   Melo FPL, 2009, BIOTROPICA, V41, P737, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00528.x
   Montes C, 2012, GEOL SOC AM BULL, V124, P780, DOI 10.1130/B30528.1
   Moreira JI, 2017, BIOTROPICA, V49, P502, DOI 10.1111/btp.12427
   Morley RJ, 2003, AM J BOT, V90, P1638, DOI 10.3732/ajb.90.11.1638
   Muller-Landau HC, 2008, J ECOL, V96, P653, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01399.x
   Myster RW, 2020, BOT REV, V86, P119, DOI 10.1007/s12229-020-09219-x
   Nathan R, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P786, DOI [10.1126/science.1124975, 10.1016/j.tree.2008.08.003]
   Nuñez-Iturri G, 2007, BIOTROPICA, V39, P348, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00276.x
   O'Dea A, 2016, SCI ADV, V2, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1600883
   Ogburn RM, 2015, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V92, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.06.006
   Peterson AT, 1999, SCIENCE, V285, P1265, DOI 10.1126/science.285.5431.1265
   Pirie MD, 2018, ROY SOC OPEN SCI, V5, DOI 10.1098/rsos.171561
   Qiu YL, 2006, TAXON, V55, P837, DOI 10.2307/25065680
   Rambaut A, 2018, SYST BIOL, V67, P901, DOI 10.1093/sysbio/syy032
   RAVEN PH, 1974, ANN MO BOT GARD, V61, P539, DOI 10.2307/2395021
   Revell LJ, 2012, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V3, P217, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x
   Särkinen T, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0043808
   Särkinen T, 2012, J BIOGEOGR, V39, P884, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02644.x
   Santamaría-Aguilar D, 2021, PHYTOKEYS, P147, DOI 10.3897/phytokeys.178.64564
   Santamaría-Aguilar D, 2019, BRITTONIA, V71, P369, DOI 10.1007/s12228-019-09585-w
   Sauquet H, 2003, BOT J LINN SOC, V142, P125, DOI 10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.00171.x
   Sharma MV, 2013, TROP CONSERV SCI, V6, P595, DOI 10.1177/194008291300600502
   Simon MF, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P20359, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0903410106
   Slimp M, 2021, APPL PLANT SCI, V9, DOI 10.1002/aps3.11419
   Smith SA, 2012, BIOINFORMATICS, V28, P2689, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts492
   Soltis DE, 2007, INT J PLANT SCI, V168, P137, DOI 10.1086/509788
   Stamatakis, 2011, EXELIXISRRDR201110 H
   Storchová H, 2000, TAXON, V49, P79, DOI 10.2307/1223934
   ter Steege H, 2006, NATURE, V443, P444, DOI 10.1038/nature05134
   Terborgh J.W., 2017, BIODIVERSIDAD AMAZON, V5
   Terborgh J, 2011, J ECOL, V99, P935, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01836.x
   Thomas DC, 2017, J BIOGEOGR, V44, P2862, DOI 10.1111/jbi.13086
   Upchurch P, 2008, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V23, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.006
   Valcárcel V, 2019, J SYST EVOL, V57, P547, DOI 10.1111/jse.12522
   Warren DL., 2019, ENMTools (Software Package)
   Wittmann F, 2006, J BIOGEOGR, V33, P1334, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01495.x
   Wolfe J.A., 1977, 997 US GOVT PRINT, DOI [10.3133/pp997, DOI 10.3133/PP997]
   WOLFE JA, 1975, ANN MO BOT GARD, V62, P264, DOI 10.2307/2395198
   Xue BN, 2018, TAXON, V67, P250, DOI 10.12705/672.2
NR 97
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 2
U2 24
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0305-0270
EI 1365-2699
J9 J BIOGEOGR
JI J. Biogeogr.
PD JAN
PY 2022
VL 49
IS 1
BP 156
EP 170
DI 10.1111/jbi.14290
EA DEC 2021
PG 15
WC Ecology; Geography, Physical
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Physical Geography
GA XX9UO
UT WOS:000728905100001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Al-Chokhachy, R
   Alder, J
   Hostetler, S
   Gresswell, R
   Shepard, B
AF Al-Chokhachy, Robert
   Alder, Jay
   Hostetler, Steven
   Gresswell, Robert
   Shepard, Bradley
TI Thermal controls of Yellowstone cutthroat trout and invasive fishes
   under climate change
SO GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; Greater Yellowstone; growth; non-natives; trout
ID NONNATIVE BROOK TROUT; STREAM TEMPERATURE; RAINBOW-TROUT; RIVER-BASIN;
   SNAKE RIVER; SALVELINUS-FONTINALIS; ONCORHYNCHUS-MYKISS; WATER
   TEMPERATURE; REGIONAL CLIMATE; SOCKEYE-SALMON
AB We combine large observed data sets and dynamically downscaled climate data to explore historic and future (2050-2069) stream temperature changes over the topographically diverse Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (elevation range=824-4017m). We link future stream temperatures with fish growth models to investigate how changing thermal regimes could influence the future distribution and persistence of native Yellowstone cutthroat trout (YCT) and competing invasive species. We find that stream temperatures during the recent decade (2000-2009) surpass the anomalously warm period of the 1930s. Climate simulations indicate air temperatures will warm by 1 degrees C to >3 degrees C over the Greater Yellowstone by mid-21st century, resulting in concomitant increases in 2050-2069 peak stream temperatures and protracted periods of warming from May to September (MJJAS). Projected changes in thermal regimes during the MJJAS growing season modify the trajectories of daily growth rates at all elevations with pronounced growth during early and late summer. For high-elevation populations, we find considerable increases in fish body mass attributable both to warming of cold-water temperatures and to extended growing seasons. During peak July to August warming, mid-21st century temperatures will cause periods of increased thermal stress, rendering some low-elevation streams less suitable for YCT. The majority (80%) of sites currently inhabited by YCT, however, display minimal loss (<10%) or positive changes in total body mass by midcentury; we attribute this response to the fact that many low-elevation populations of YCT have already been extirpated by historical changes in land use and invasions of non-native species. Our results further suggest that benefits to YCT populations due to warmer stream temperatures at currently cold sites could be offset by the interspecific effects of corresponding growth of sympatric, non-native species, underscoring the importance of developing climate adaptation strategies that reduce limiting factors such as non-native species and habitat degradation.
C1 [Al-Chokhachy, Robert; Gresswell, Robert] US Geol Survey, Northern Rocky Mt Sci Ctr, Bozeman, MT 59715 USA.
   [Alder, Jay; Hostetler, Steven] Oregon State Univ, US Geol Survey, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA.
   [Shepard, Bradley] Wildlife Conservat Soc, Livingston, MT 59047 USA.
C3 United States Department of the Interior; United States Geological
   Survey; United States Department of the Interior; United States
   Geological Survey; Oregon State University; Wildlife Conservation
   Society
RP Al-Chokhachy, R (corresponding author), US Geol Survey, Northern Rocky Mt Sci Ctr, 2327 Univ Way,Suite 2, Bozeman, MT 59715 USA.
EM ral-chokhachy@usgs.gov
RI Gresswell, Robert/ABH-8944-2020; Al-Chokhachy, Robert/F-2894-2010
OI Alder, Jay/0000-0003-2378-2853; Gresswell, Robert/0000-0003-0063-855X
FU US Geological Survey Mendenhall Fellowship Program
FX We acknowledge the Yellowstone cutthroat trout Multistate Group for
   assembling the non-native and YCT distribution data. We thank A. White
   (Montana State University) for GIS assistance, and J. Kershner (USGS)
   and D. Isaak (USFS) for reviews of earlier drafts. R.A. is funded
   through the US Geological Survey Mendenhall Fellowship Program. Any use
   of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and
   does not imply endorsement by the US Government.
CR Alder JR, 2011, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V4, P69, DOI 10.5194/gmd-4-69-2011
   ALLENDORF F W, 1988, Conservation Biology, V2, P170, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1988.tb00168.x
   Allendorf FW, 2001, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V16, P613, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02290-X
   Alvarez D, 2006, EVOL ECOL, V20, P345, DOI 10.1007/s10682-006-0004-1
   Anderson JL, 2004, J CLIMATE, V17, P4641, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-3223.1
   ANGRADI TR, 1990, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V47, P199, DOI 10.1139/f90-022
   [Anonymous], 2011, 20111238 US GEOL SUR
   [Anonymous], 2007, SYNTHESIS REPORT CON
   [Anonymous], MAX PLANCK INSTITUT
   Baringer MO, 2010, B AM METEOROL SOC, V91, pS1, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-91-7-StateoftheClimate
   Bear EA, 2007, T AM FISH SOC, V136, P1113, DOI 10.1577/T06-072.1
   Bogan T, 2003, WATER RESOUR RES, V39, DOI 10.1029/2003WR002034
   Brett J. R., 1979, Environmental factors and growth
   BRETT JR, 1971, AM ZOOL, V11, P99
   Brown JH, 1971, AM NAT, V105, P13
   Buys DJ, 2009, WEST N AM NATURALIST, V69, P371, DOI 10.3398/064.069.0311
   Caissie D, 2006, FRESHWATER BIOL, V51, P1389, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01597.x
   Charmantier A, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P800, DOI 10.1126/science.1157174
   Clews E, 2010, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V16, P3271, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02211.x
   DALY C, 1994, J APPL METEOROL, V33, P140, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1994)033<0140:ASTMFM>2.0.CO;2
   DESTASO J, 1994, T AM FISH SOC, V123, P289, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1994)123<0289:IOWTOI>2.3.CO;2
   Domisch S, 2011, FRESHWATER BIOL, V56, P2009, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02631.x
   Downs Christopher C., 1997, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, V17, P85, DOI 10.1577/1548-8675(1997)017<0085:AASMSR>2.3.CO;2
   FAUSCH KD, 1994, OECOLOGIA, V100, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00317124
   Franco EAD, 2005, ENVIRON BIOL FISH, V72, P379, DOI 10.1007/s10641-004-2591-4
   GRESSWELL RE, 1995, CONSERV BIOL, V9, P159, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09010159.x
   Gresswell RE, 2011, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V31, P782, DOI 10.1080/02755947.2011.608980
   Gunnell K, 2008, CONSERV GENET, V9, P49, DOI 10.1007/s10592-007-9302-6
   Hilderbrand RH, 2004, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V24, P33, DOI 10.1577/M02-192
   Hoffmann AA, 2011, NATURE, V470, P479, DOI 10.1038/nature09670
   Isaak DJ, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V113, P499, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0326-z
   Isaak DJ, 2012, FISHERIES, V37, P542, DOI 10.1080/03632415.2012.742808
   Isaak DJ, 2010, ECOL APPL, V20, P1350, DOI 10.1890/09-0822.1
   Isaak DJ, 2004, T AM FISH SOC, V133, P1254, DOI 10.1577/T03-010.1
   Jacob D, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V81, P31, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9213-4
   Johnson SL, 2003, HYDROL PROCESS, V17, P497, DOI 10.1002/hyp.5091
   Kaeding LR, 1996, AM MIDL NAT, V135, P283, DOI 10.2307/2426711
   Kalnay E, 1996, B AM METEOROL SOC, V77, P437, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO;2
   Kanamitsu M, 2002, B AM METEOROL SOC, V83, P1631, DOI [10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631(2002)083<1631:NAR>2.3.CO;2, 10.1175/Bams-83-11-1631]
   Kaushal SS, 2010, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V8, P461, DOI 10.1890/090037
   Kovach RP, 2011, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V31, P1077, DOI 10.1080/02755947.2011.640899
   Kruse Carter G., 2000, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, V20, P693, DOI 10.1577/1548-8675(2000)020<0693:SOYCTI>2.3.CO;2
   Lawler JJ, 2009, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1162, P79, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04147.x
   Lawrence DJ, 2011, CONSERV LETT, V4, P364, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00185.x
   LEVY DA, 1990, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V47, P1796, DOI 10.1139/f90-204
   Luce CH, 2009, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V36, DOI 10.1029/2009GL039407
   MANGEL M, 1994, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V41, P75, DOI 10.1016/0967-0645(94)90063-9
   May BE, 2006, RANGE WIDE STATUS AS
   McClanahan TR, 2008, CONSERV LETT, V1, P53, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00008_1.x
   McGrath CC, 2007, T AM FISH SOC, V136, P1381, DOI 10.1577/T07-017.1
   McMahon TE, 2007, T AM FISH SOC, V136, P1313, DOI 10.1577/T06-217.1
   Meyer KA, 2003, T AM FISH SOC, V132, P183, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(2003)132<0183:RDAFTI>2.0.CO;2
   Mohseni O, 1998, WATER RESOUR RES, V34, P2685, DOI 10.1029/98WR01877
   Mohseni O, 2003, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V59, P389, DOI 10.1023/A:1024847723344
   Mohseni O, 2002, J ENVIRON ENG-ASCE, V128, P4, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2002)128:1(4)
   Mohseni O, 1999, J HYDROL, V218, P128, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00034-7
   Muhlfeld CC, 2009, BIOL LETTERS, V5, P328, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0033
   Nakicenovic N., 2000, IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES)
   Noss RF, 2001, CONSERV BIOL, V15, P578, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003578.x
   Noss RF, 2002, CONSERV BIOL, V16, P895, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01405.x
   Nowak GM, 2002, T AM FISH SOC, V131, P452, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(2002)131<0452:DASPOH>2.0.CO;2
   Pal JS, 2007, B AM METEOROL SOC, V88, P1395, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-88-9-1395
   Parmesan C, 2003, NATURE, V421, P37, DOI 10.1038/nature01286
   Peterson DP, 2008, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V65, P557, DOI 10.1139/F07-184
   Peterson DP, 2004, ECOL APPL, V14, P754, DOI 10.1890/02-5395
   Rahel FJ, 2008, CONSERV BIOL, V22, P551, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00953.x
   Rieman BE, 2006, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V63, P63, DOI 10.1139/F05-206
   Ruff CP, 2011, ECOLOGY, V92, P2073, DOI 10.1890/10-1762.1
   Seiler SM, 2007, ANIM BEHAV, V74, P1805, DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.03.025
   Sinokrot BA, 2000, J HYDRAUL RES, V38, P339, DOI 10.1080/00221680009498315
   Sloat MR, 2005, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V25, P225, DOI 10.1577/M03-165.1
   Stapp P, 2002, J FRESHWATER ECOL, V17, P319, DOI 10.1080/02705060.2002.9663900
   Taniguchi Y, 2000, ECOLOGY, V81, P2027, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2027:CSCIFT]2.0.CO;2
   Torgersen CE, 1999, ECOL APPL, V9, P301, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0301:MTRASH]2.0.CO;2
   Van Kirk RW, 2007, ECOL MODEL, V206, P407, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.04.003
   Walther GR, 2002, NATURE, V416, P389, DOI 10.1038/416389a
   Warren DR, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P1804, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02670.x
   Webb BW, 2008, HYDROL PROCESS, V22, P902, DOI 10.1002/hyp.6994
   Wengeler WR, 2010, BIOL CONSERV, V143, P1144, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.02.012
   Wenger SJ, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P14175, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1103097108
   Wenger SJ, 2011, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V68, P988, DOI [10.1139/F2011-034, 10.1139/f2011-034]
   Wenger SJ, 2010, WATER RESOUR RES, V46, DOI 10.1029/2009WR008839
   Westley PAH, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V280, P9
   WHITLOCK C, 1993, QUATERNARY RES, V39, P231, DOI 10.1006/qres.1993.1026
   Wu H., 2012, WATER RESOURCES RES, V48
   Xu CL, 2010, FRESHWATER BIOL, V55, P2253, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02430.x
   Zhu WQ, 2012, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V21, P260, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00675.x
NR 87
TC 41
Z9 48
U1 1
U2 82
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1354-1013
EI 1365-2486
J9 GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL
JI Glob. Change Biol.
PD OCT
PY 2013
VL 19
IS 10
DI 10.1111/gcb.12262
PG 12
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 210OS
UT WOS:000323844200014
PM 23687062
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Bernabé-Crespo, MB
   Cantos, JO
   Cañizares, AO
AF Bernabe-Crespo, Miguel B.
   Cantos, Jorge Olcina
   Canizares, Antonio Oliva
TI Proposal of the "Wastewater Use Basin" Concept as an Integrated Sewage
   and Rainwater Management Unit in Semiarid Regions-A Case Study in the
   Southeast of the Iberian Peninsula
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE sewage; rainwater; environmental tanks; climate change; drought
ID PUBLIC ACCEPTABILITY; FUTURE SCENARIOS; REUSE; ACCEPTANCE; TRENDS
AB Semi-arid and arid regions are characterized by their water scarcity, which leads territories to seek ways of increasing the water resources available to meet their demands (urban, agricultural, industrial, leisure and tourism, etc.). For this reason, this article proposes the term "wastewater use basin"; the concept of the "wastewater use basin" is presented as a working unit of a smaller scale than traditional river basins, which allows for a better management of the water collected in the sewerage network and rainwater of urban agglomerations. It is a geographically-focused proposal for the integrated management of wastewater and stormwater that ends up in a wastewater treatment plant for treatment and reuse. The study area is located in the southeast of the Iberian Peninsula, Spain; specifically, the Campo of Cartagena-Mar Menor district (Murcia) and Vega Baja district (Alicante). The results show the trend behaviour of rainfall in the Segura river basin in recent episodes of torrential rainfall. There is a clear tendency for these episodes to occur in the coastal and pre-coastal areas, so that the water does not reach the headwaters where the reservoirs are located. For this reason, the proposed concept includes the area of the basin that would be formed by the wastewater and rainwater collectors which, in short, are intended to be treated in a treatment plant for subsequent reuse. The calculations made on the basis of the capacity of the environmental tanks executed and projected amount to four cubic hectometers which could be added to the hydrological planning of the Segura basin. In conclusion, the collection of rainwater allows the incorporation of an additional volume of water that complements and increases the resources offered by the treatment plants in the hydrological planning. It also serves as a measure of adaptation to climatic extremes (droughts and floods) and to the effects of climate change, supporting a circular management of the use of resources.
C1 [Bernabe-Crespo, Miguel B.] Autonomous Univ Madrid, Dept Geog, Madrid 28049, Spain.
   [Cantos, Jorge Olcina] Univ Alicante, Dept Reg Geog Anal & Phys Geog, San Vicente Del Raspeig 03690, Spain.
   [Canizares, Antonio Oliva] Univ Alicante, Interuniv Inst Geog, San Vicente Del Raspeig 03690, Spain.
C3 Autonomous University of Madrid; Universitat d'Alacant; Universitat
   d'Alacant
RP Cañizares, AO (corresponding author), Univ Alicante, Interuniv Inst Geog, San Vicente Del Raspeig 03690, Spain.
EM miguelb.bernabe@uam.es; jorge.olcina@ua.es; antoniogeografia1@gmail.com
RI Oliva, Antonio/JFB-1346-2023; Olcina, Jorge/H-2447-2015
OI BERNABE-CRESPO, MIGUEL BORJA/0000-0001-7269-3270; Oliva Canizares,
   Antonio/0000-0001-6222-5852; Olcina, Jorge/0000-0002-4846-8126
FU Research Groups "Climate and Land Use Planning" and "Climate and Water"
   of the Interuniversity Institute of Geography of the University of
   Alicante
FX The work has been funded with research support from the Research Groups
   "Climate and Land Use Planning" and "Climate and Water" of the
   Interuniversity Institute of Geography of the University of Alicante.
CR AEMET, 2023, PROYECC CLIM SIGL 21
   Aemig Q, 2021, WATER RES, V188, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116524
   Aitken V, 2014, WATER SCI TECH-W SUP, V14, P875, DOI 10.2166/ws.2014.051
   [Anonymous], 2016, EMCDDA-Europol 2016 Annual Report on the Implementation of Council Decision 2005/387/JHA, P1
   Barro J.R., 2015, TECNOAQUA, V12, P70
   Beard JE, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11215936
   Bernabé-Crespo MB, 2022, URBAN WATER J, V19, P629, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2022.2069043
   Bernabe-Crespo M.B., 2020, CANALES AGUA ABASTEC, DOI [10.17561/at.20.6163, DOI 10.17561/AT.20.6163]
   Bernabé-Crespo MB, 2022, CUAD TUR, P289, DOI 10.6018/turismo.521921
   Bernabé-Crespo MB, 2021, B ASOC GEOGR ESP, DOI 10.21138/bage.3009
   Bernabé-Crespo MB, 2019, J POLIT ECOL, V26, P486, DOI 10.2458/v26i1.22911
   Cañizares AO, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14132023
   CEDEX, 2021, IMP CAMB CLIM PREC M
   Centro de Estudios Ambientales del Mediterraneo (CEAM), 2020, MED SST REP AUT 2020
   Centro de Estudios y experimentacion de obras publicas (CEDEX), 2017, Evaluacion del Impacto del Cambio Climatico en los Recursos Hidricos y Sequias en Espana
   Chamizo-Checa S, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12030824
   Cooley H, 2019, ENVIRON RES COMMUN, V1, DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/ab22ca
   Diogo AF, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132212696
   Diogo AF, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11040759
   Diogo AF, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V612, P1042, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.315
   Dolnicar S, 2011, WATER RES, V45, P933, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.030
   Estrela M.J., 2019, P SEM ESTR AD CRIS C
   Garcia-Cuerva L, 2016, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V113, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.006
   Gil-Meseguer E, 2019, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V33, P725, DOI 10.1007/s11269-018-2136-9
   Gil-Meseguer E, 2018, TECNOL CIENC AGUA, V9, P192, DOI 10.24850/j-tyca-2018-02-08
   Harris-Lovett S, 2020, SCIENCE, V369, P1429, DOI 10.1126/science.abd0700
   Harris-Lovett SR, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P7552, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b00504
   Hartley TW, 2006, DESALINATION, V187, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.072
   Hernandez Hernandez M., 2020, RIESGO INUNDACION ES, P531
   Hernández-Hernández M, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12092616
   Hernndez M., 2019, Journal of Urban Planning, Landscape Environmental Design, V4, P53
   INFORM, 2020, SHAR EV MAN CRIS DIS
   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2018, SPEC REP GLOB WARM 1
   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2022, AR6 Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis
   Jodar Abellan A., 2019, AGUA PROVINCIAL ALIC, V70, P84
   JRC-PESETA IV, 2020, AD RIS RIV FLOOD RIS
   Lefebvre O, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SCI HL, V2, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.coesh.2017.12.001
   Leverenz HL, 2011, J WATER REUSE DESAL, V1, P2, DOI 10.2166/wrd.2011.000
   Lienert J, 2006, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V40, P436, DOI 10.1021/es0514139
   Loáiciga HA, 2015, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000487
   López-Ruiz S, 2021, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V37, P772, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2020.1799762
   Martínez-Valderrama J, 2023, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V37, P2805, DOI 10.1007/s11269-023-03481-5
   Mediterranean Experts on Climate and Environmental Change (MedECC), 2019, RISKS ASS CLIM ENV C
   Melgarejo-Moreno J, 2016, AQUA TERRIT, P22, DOI 10.17561/at.v0i8.3293
   Meseguer-Ruiz O, 2023, INVESTIG GEOGR-SPAIN, P9, DOI 10.14198/INGEO.24093
   Miro J., 2019, CLIMAS TIEMPOS PAIS, P171
   Miró JJ, 2021, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/atmos12070879
   Morales A., 1996, INVEST GEOGR-MEX, V15, P127, DOI [10.14198/INGEO1996.15.06, DOI 10.14198/INGEO1996.15.06]
   Morote Seguido A. F., 2017, Papeles de Geografia, V63, P7
   Seguido AFM, 2018, B ASOC GEOGR ESP, DOI 10.21138/bage.2754
   Olcina Cantos J., 2018, RESILIENCIA CICLO UR, V8
   Olcina Cantos J., 2021, CAMBIO CLIMATICO MED, P19
   Cantos JO, 2009, INVESTIG GEOGR-SPAIN, P197
   Olcina J., 2020, RIESGO INUNDACION ES, P465
   OLCINA J., 2010, INVEST GEOGR-MEX, P131, DOI [10.14198/INGEO2010.51.06, DOI 10.14198/INGEO2010.51.06]
   Pastor Guzman F., 2017, P 10 HYMEX WORKSHOP
   Morales AP, 2014, B ASOC GEOGR ESP, P151, DOI 10.21138/bage.1691
   Prados Maria Jose, 2022, Ordenacion del territorio y medio ambiente, P579
   Preisner M, 2020, ENVIRON MANAGE, V66, P694, DOI 10.1007/s00267-020-01344-y
   Rice J, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V27, P467, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.007
   Rice J, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P11099, DOI 10.1021/es402792s
   Roeleveld PJ, 2002, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V45, P77
   Schmidt CW, 2008, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V116, pA524, DOI 10.1289/ehp.116-a524
   Schmidt-Thome P., 2005, Final Report of the European Spatial Planning and Observation Network (ESPON) project, V1, P1
   Seguido A. F. M., 2018, INVESTIGACIONES GEOG, P47, DOI DOI 10.14198/INGEO2018.70.03
   Shaltout M, 2014, OCEANOLOGIA, V56, P411, DOI 10.5697/oc.56-3.411
   Skliris N, 2012, OCEAN DYNAM, V62, P13, DOI 10.1007/s10236-011-0493-5
   Warner R, 2009, GEOGR RES-AUST, V47, P227, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2009.00593.x
NR 68
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 7
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD JUN
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 12
AR 2181
DI 10.3390/w15122181
PG 26
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA K6YF6
UT WOS:001017872100001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Fofana, B
   Soto-Cerda, B
   Zaidi, M
   Main, D
   Fillmore, S
AF Fofana, Bourlaye
   Soto-Cerda, Braulio
   Zaidi, Moshin
   Main, David
   Fillmore, Sherry
TI Genome-wide genetic architecture for plant maturity and drought
   tolerance in diploid potatoes
SO FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
LA English
DT Article
DE diploid potato; climate change; drought; maturity; GWAS; candidate genes
ID WATER-STRESS; MIXED-MODEL; ASSOCIATION; CULTIVARS; GROWTH; METABOLISM;
   TRAITS; POLLEN; LIMITS; DEPTH
AB Cultivated potato (Solanum tuberosum) is known to be highly susceptible to drought. With climate change and its frequent episodes of drought, potato growers will face increased challenges to achieving their yield goals. Currently, a high proportion of untapped potato germplasm remains within the diploid potato relatives, and the genetic architecture of the drought tolerance and maturity traits of diploid potatoes is still unknown. As such, a panel of 384 ethyl methanesulfonate-mutagenized diploid potato clones were evaluated for drought tolerance and plant maturity under field conditions. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were conducted to dissect the genetic architecture of the traits. The results obtained from the genetic structure analysis of the panel showed five main groups and seven subgroups. Using the Genome Association and Prediction Integrated Tool-mixed linear model GWAS statistical model, 34 and 17 significant quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs) were found associated with maturity and drought traits, respectively. Chromosome 5 carried most of the QTNs, some of which were also detected by using the restricted two-stage multi-locus multi-allele-GWAS haploblock-based model, and two QTNs were found to be pleiotropic for both maturity and drought traits. Using the non-parametric U-test, one and three QTNs, with 5.13%-7.4% phenotypic variations explained, showed favorable allelic effects that increase the maturity and drought trait values. The quantitaive trait loci (QTLs)/QTNs associated with maturity and drought trait were found co-located in narrow (0.5-1 kb) genomic regions with 56 candidate genes playing roles in plant development and senescence and in abiotic stress responses. A total of 127 potato clones were found to be late maturing and tolerant to drought, while nine were early to moderate-late maturing and tolerant to drought. Taken together, the data show that the studied germplasm panel and the identified candidate genes are prime genetic resources for breeders and biologists in conventional breeding and targeted gene editing as climate adaptation tools.
C1 [Fofana, Bourlaye; Zaidi, Moshin; Main, David] Agr & Agrifood Canada, Charlottetown Res & Dev Ctr, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.
   [Soto-Cerda, Braulio] Univ Catol Temuco, Fac Recursos Nat, Dept Ciencias Agr & Acuicolas, Temuco, Chile.
   [Soto-Cerda, Braulio] Univ Catol Temuco, Fac Recursos Nat, Nucleo Invest Prod Alimentaria, Temuco, Chile.
   [Fillmore, Sherry] Agr & Agrifood Canada, Kentville Res & Dev Ctr, Kentville, NS, Canada.
C3 Agriculture & Agri Food Canada; Agriculture & Agri Food Canada
RP Fofana, B (corresponding author), Agr & Agrifood Canada, Charlottetown Res & Dev Ctr, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.
EM bourlaye.fofana@agr.gc.ca
RI Fofana, Bourlaye/W-4694-2019
FU Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada [J-00076, J-002665]
FX The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research,
   authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded
   by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada under A-base projects J-00076 and
   J-002665.
CR Aliche EB, 2020, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V146, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.11.019
   Aliche EB, 2018, AGR WATER MANAGE, V206, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.013
   Allard R. W., 1964, Crop science, V4, P503, DOI 10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400050021x
   Anithakumari AM, 2012, MOL BREEDING, V30, P1413, DOI 10.1007/s11032-012-9728-5
   Khan MA, 2015, PLANT MOL BIOL REP, V33, P1286, DOI 10.1007/s11105-014-0824-z
   Bashir I., 2021, Wild germplasm for genetic improvement in crop plants, P215
   Beissinger TM, 2013, GENETICS, V193, P1073, DOI 10.1534/genetics.112.147710
   Berdugo-Cely J, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0173039
   Berthouly-Salazar C, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00777
   Bradbury PJ, 2007, BIOINFORMATICS, V23, P2633, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308
   Buntjer JB, 2005, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V10, P466, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.08.007
   Chang CC, 2015, GIGASCIENCE, V4, DOI 10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8
   Chen K, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-41217-x
   Chung YS, 2017, HORTIC ENVIRON BIOTE, V58, P425, DOI 10.1007/s13580-017-0297-8
   Cortes LT, 2021, PLANT GENOME-US, V14, DOI 10.1002/tpg2.20077
   Cui YR, 2018, FRONT PLANT SCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00320
   D'Agostino N, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-34207-y
   Dietz KJ, 2021, PLANT BIOLOGY, V23, P881, DOI 10.1111/plb.13304
   EL Sabagh A, 2022, FRONT AGRON, V4, DOI 10.3389/fagro.2022.765068
   Elshire RJ, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019379
   Favre F, 2021, METHODS MOL BIOL, V2222, P167, DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-0997-2_10
   FELSENSTEIN J, 1981, J MOL EVOL, V17, P368, DOI 10.1007/BF01734359
   FELSENSTEIN J, 1985, EVOLUTION, V39, P783, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x
   Ganal MW, 2009, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V12, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.009
   Garcia M, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0211730
   Gervais T, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2021.698060
   Goodwin S, 2016, NAT REV GENET, V17, P333, DOI 10.1038/nrg.2016.49
   Guo YF, 2021, MOL HORTIC, V1, DOI 10.1186/s43897-021-00006-9
   Gutiérrez N, 2023, FRONT PLANT SCI, V14, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2023.1091875
   Happ MM, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2021.630175
   He JB, 2017, THEOR APPL GENET, V130, P2327, DOI 10.1007/s00122-017-2962-9
   He JF, 2014, FRONT PLANT SCI, V5, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00484
   HE JX, 1995, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V93, P771, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1995.tb05130.x
   Hill D, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2020.597554
   Hu W, 2019, PLANT SCI, V286, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.06.003
   Joshi R, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.01029
   Kumar S, 2012, BMC GENOMICS, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-684
   Lahlou O, 2005, EUR J AGRON, V22, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2004.02.004
   Li H., 2013, GENOMICS, DOI [10.48550/arXiv.1303.3997, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1303.3997]
   Li H, 2010, BIOINFORMATICS, V26, P589, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698
   Li M, 2022, MOL PLANT, V15, P1251, DOI 10.1016/j.molp.2022.06.002
   Li M, 2022, MOL PLANT, V15, P630, DOI 10.1016/j.molp.2022.02.012
   Lim PO, 2007, ANNU REV PLANT BIOL, V58, P115, DOI 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105316
   Lin DZ, 2021, G3-GENES GENOM GENET, V11, DOI 10.1093/g3journal/jkab196
   Lipka AE, 2012, BIOINFORMATICS, V28, P2397, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts444
   Liu XL, 2016, PLOS GENET, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005767
   Lo S, 2019, THEOR APPL GENET, V132, P3079, DOI 10.1007/s00122-019-03407-z
   Mammadov Jafar, 2012, Int J Plant Genomics, V2012, P728398, DOI 10.1155/2012/728398
   Martínez I, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2021.693060
   Martínez-Vilalta J, 2017, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V40, P962, DOI 10.1111/pce.12846
   Mathew I, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0225383
   Moose SP, 2008, PLANT PHYSIOL, V147, P969, DOI 10.1104/pp.108.118232
   Nagar S, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2021.692252
   Nasir MW, 2022, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/agronomy12030635
   Patrick JW, 2010, FIELD CROP RES, V115, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.005
   Pham GM, 2020, GIGASCIENCE, V9, DOI 10.1093/gigascience/giaa100
   Piepho HP, 2008, EUPHYTICA, V161, P209, DOI 10.1007/s10681-007-9449-8
   Poland JA, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032253
   Pootakham Wirulda, 2023, Methods Mol Biol, V2638, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-3024-2_1
   Rafalski A, 2002, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V5, P94, DOI 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00240-6
   Ren WL, 2018, HEREDITY, V120, P208, DOI 10.1038/s41437-017-0007-4
   SAITOU N, 1987, MOL BIOL EVOL, V4, P406, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454
   Schittenhelm S, 2006, EUR J AGRON, V24, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2005.05.004
   Schliep KP, 2011, BIOINFORMATICS, V27, P592, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq706
   Schumacher C, 2021, INT J MOL SCI, V22, DOI 10.3390/ijms22116123
   Schwarze K, 2020, GENET MED, V22, P85, DOI 10.1038/s41436-019-0618-7
   Shen JB, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-05913-y
   Shinozaki K, 2007, J EXP BOT, V58, P221, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erl164
   Somalraju A., 2020, Crop Breed Genet Genom, V2, DOI 10.20900/cbgg20200017
   Somalraju A, 2019, CAN J PLANT SCI, V99, P138, DOI 10.1139/cjps-2018-0189
   Soto-Cerda BJ, 2020, MOL BREEDING, V40, DOI 10.1007/s11032-019-1096-y
   Sprenger H, 2016, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V39, P2370, DOI 10.1111/pce.12780
   Sreeparvathy V, 2022, NPJ CLIM ATMOS SCI, V5, DOI 10.1038/s41612-022-00302-1
   Su JJ, 2020, BMC PLANT BIOL, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12870-020-02613-y
   Tamba CL, 2017, PLOS COMPUT BIOL, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005357
   Tang Y, 2016, PLANT GENOME-US, V9, DOI 10.3835/plantgenome2015.11.0120
   Tiwari Jagesh Kumar, 2022, Genomic designing for abiotic stress resistant vegetable crops, P49, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-03964-5_2
   Van der Auwera G. A., 2020, Genomics in the cloud: using Docker, GATK, and WDL in Terra
   VANLOON CD, 1981, AM POTATO J, V58, P51, DOI 10.1007/BF02855380
   Wang JB, 2021, GENOM PROTEOM BIOINF, V19, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.gpb.2021.08.005
   Wang N, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-73321-8
   Wang SB, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep19444
   Wang YX, 2010, PLANT J, V64, P230, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04320.x
   Waser NM, 2016, ECOLOGY, V97, P1400, DOI 10.1890/15-1423.1
   Wen YJ, 2018, BRIEF BIOINFORM, V19, P700, DOI 10.1093/bib/bbw145
   Xiong DL, 2020, PLANT J, V101, P800, DOI 10.1111/tpj.14595
   You FM, 2022, INT J MOL SCI, V23, DOI 10.3390/ijms23094960
   Yu JM, 2006, CURR OPIN BIOTECH, V17, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.02.003
   Yu JM, 2006, NAT GENET, V38, P203, DOI 10.1038/ng1702
   Zhao Peng, 2020, CRAN
NR 90
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 11
U2 24
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 1664-8021
J9 FRONT GENET
JI Front. Genet.
PD JAN 31
PY 2024
VL 14
AR 1306519
DI 10.3389/fgene.2023.1306519
PG 15
WC Genetics & Heredity
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Genetics & Heredity
GA HP7Z3
UT WOS:001160788200001
PM 38357658
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sjöman, JD
   Tuhkanen, EM
   Mänttäri, M
   Cimburova, Z
   Stalhammar, S
   Barton, DN
   Randrup, TB
AF Sjoman, Johanna Deak
   Tuhkanen, Eeva-Maria
   Manttari, Miia
   Cimburova, Zofie
   Stalhammar, Sanna
   Barton, David N.
   Randrup, Thomas B.
TI Expectations of i-Tree Eco as a tool for urban tree management in Nordic
   cities
SO FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE i-Tree Eco; urban trees; urban forest; ecosystem services; green space
   management; governance; landscape; green infrastructure
ID ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ECONOMIC VALUATION; SPACE MANAGEMENT;
   DECISION-MAKING; GOVERNANCE; CHALLENGES; KNOWLEDGE; CANOPY; POLICY;
   STATE
AB While urban forests are recognized as imperative toward climate adaptation in cities and provide health and recreational benefits to citizens, municipal tree officers often struggle to find successful governance arrangements and budget support toward long-lasting investment and implementation in new planting schemes and protection of existing trees. Since its release in 2006, i-Tree Eco has helped urban tree officers worldwide to find tangible leverage in the means of quantitative mapping, numeric measures, and economic values of ecosystem services. This may in turn help ease gridlocks and potentially support constructive dialogues across sectors, with decision-makers and public engagement. With the release of i-Tree Eco v. 6 in Europe 2018, 13 Nordic cities were engaged in a larger research project with ambitions to use i-Tree Eco for the purpose of retrieving numeric and monetary data of the biophysical structures and ecosystem services of the urban forest. Based on questionnaires and semi-structured interviews, we present the results from the Nordic i-Tree project with a focus on expectations, opportunities, and potential barriers experienced in using i-Tree Eco in urban forest management. The most prominent expectation and foreseeing opportunities were recognized toward using numeric information on trees to change policies and support cross-sectoral collaboration while reaching politicians and the public. Identified barriers involved how limited resources are spent on public outreach and how information about the project to relevant stakeholders were not distributed from the beginning which may have implications on the dissemination of results. As some important ecosystem services, e.g., cultural services, are not captured by i-Tree Eco, presenting the partial value of urban trees may pose also potential risks to cross-sectoral collaboration. Other findings conclude that although numeric information on ecosystem services is seen as beneficial in terms of communicating with different stakeholders, a deeper understanding toward the criteria used in the valuation process and the potential risks of numeric approaches may provide more context-specific applications.
C1 [Sjoman, Johanna Deak; Stalhammar, Sanna; Randrup, Thomas B.] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Landscape Architecture Planning & Management, Uppsala, Sweden.
   [Tuhkanen, Eeva-Maria; Manttari, Miia] Nat Resources Inst Finland LUKE, Helsinki, Finland.
   [Cimburova, Zofie] Norwegian Environm Agcy, Oslo, Norway.
   [Barton, David N.] Norwegian Inst Nat Res NINA, Trondheim, Norway.
C3 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Natural Resources Institute
   Finland (Luke); Norwegian Institute Nature Research
RP Sjöman, JD (corresponding author), Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Landscape Architecture Planning & Management, Uppsala, Sweden.
EM johanna.deak.sjoman@slu.se
RI Barton, David/KGM-8862-2024; Randrup, Thomas/JCE-0718-2023; B. Randrup,
   Thomas/N-1650-2015
OI B. Randrup, Thomas/0000-0003-1368-3915
FU SLU Movium Think Tank, a university-based research communication
   organization within the field of life sciences [17317]
FX The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research,
   authorship, and/or publication of this article. SLU Movium Think Tank, a
   university-based research communication organization within the field of
   life sciences providing funding for partnership collaboration, Project
   No. 17317.
CR Andersson-Sköld Y, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V205, P274, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.071
   Barton DN, 2018, ECOSYST SERV, V29, P529, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.021
   Beery T, 2016, ECOSYST SERV, V17, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.12.002
   Bevan MT, 2014, QUAL HEALTH RES, V24, P136, DOI 10.1177/1049732313519710
   Breed CA, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127626
   Cimburova Z, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126801
   Costanza R, 1997, NATURE, V387, P253, DOI 10.1038/387253a0
   Costanza R, 2017, ECOSYST SERV, V28, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
   Czúcz B, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106729
   Davies HJ, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V156, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.020
   Dempsey N, 2012, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V11, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.09.005
   Ernstson H, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P274, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.012
   European Commission, 2019, Green Infrastructure
   Fongar C, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126438
   Foucault M., 1969, The Archaeology of Knowledge
   Gomez-Baggethun E., 2016, Routledge handbook of ecosystem services, P99
   Gómez-Baggethun E, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019
   Gómez-Baggethun E, 2011, PROG PHYS GEOG, V35, P613, DOI 10.1177/0309133311421708
   Greater London Authority, 2023, Trees and woodlands
   Hagemann F.A., 2020, Socio-Ecological Practice Research, V2, P283, DOI DOI 10.1007/S42532-020-00054-3
   Haines-Young R., 2010, Ecosystem Ecology: a new synthesis, P110, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511750458.007, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511750458.007]
   Hamel P, 2021, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V1, DOI 10.1038/s42949-021-00027-9
   Hand K., 2018, i-Tree Eco as a tool to inform urban forestry in GB: a literature review of its current application within urban forestry policy and management context
   Hansen K, 2016, SCAND J FOREST RES, V31, P626, DOI 10.1080/02827581.2016.1164888
   Head BW, 2007, AUST J POLIT SCI, V42, P441, DOI 10.1080/10361140701513570
   Husserl Edmund, 2013, Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology
   i-Tree International, 2022, I-tree tools org. Tools for assessing and managing forests and community trees
   ISA, 2020, Guide for Plant Appraisal, V10th
   Jansson M, 2019, LANDSCAPE RES, V44, P952, DOI 10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199
   Jax K, 2018, ECOSYST SERV, V29, P415, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.001
   Jax K, 2013, ECOL ECON, V93, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.008
   Klobucar B, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127118
   Kondo MC, 2020, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V4, pE149, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30058-9
   Konijnendijk CC, 2023, J FORESTRY RES, V34, P821, DOI 10.1007/s11676-022-01523-z
   Kumar P., 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations (1. publ)
   Larsen L, 2004, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V70, P374
   Maes J, 2012, ECOSYST SERV, V1, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004
   May PJ, 2007, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V9, P479, DOI 10.1080/14719030701726473
   Meagher L, 2008, RES EVALUAT, V17, P163, DOI 10.3152/095820208X331720
   Moreno C., 2016, Ecology, V42, P30
   Nowak D.J., 2018, Arboricultural Consultant, V51, P10
   Nowak D.J., 2021, General Technical Report NRS-200-2021
   Nutley SM., 2007, USING EVIDENCE RES C, DOI [10.2307/j.ctt9qgwt1, DOI 10.2307/J.CTT9QGWT1]
   Ordóñez C, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V189, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.020
   Östberg J, 2018, URBAN ECOSYST, V21, P467, DOI 10.1007/s11252-018-0732-3
   Ostberg Johan, 2016, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, V42, P21
   Pauleit S, 2017, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P29, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_3
   Persson B., 2020, Urban open space governance and management, P51
   Potschin-Young M, 2018, ECOSYST SERV, V29, P428, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.015
   Qiao XJ, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V196, P943, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.049
   Randrup TB, 2021, CITIES, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103225
   Randrup TB, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V28, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.10.001
   Randrup TB, 2009, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V8, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2008.08.004
   Randrup Thomas B., 2005, Journal of Arboriculture, V31, P114
   Raum S, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V190, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103590
   Schwarz K, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0122051
   SEEA, 2012, System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012, Central Framework
   Serenko A, 2007, J INTELLECT CAP, V8, P610, DOI 10.1108/14691930710830783
   Sheppard S.R., 2017, ROUTLEDGE HDB URBAN, P205
   Sjoman Henrik, 2014, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, V40, P143
   Song XP, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V29, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.017
   Teixeira FZ, 2019, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V34, P1583, DOI 10.1007/s10980-019-00778-y
   Traaholt N.V., 2015, NINA Report 1114
   Tree, 2019, Tools for assessing and managing forests and community trees
   UNECE, 2020, Trees in cities challenge
   UNEP/FAO, 2020, The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration 2021-2030
   von Döhren P, 2015, ECOL INDIC, V52, P490, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.027
   Wirtz Z, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126901
   Zhou XL, 2013, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V12, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.11.004
   Zölch T, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V157, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.023
NR 70
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 6
U2 14
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2624-9634
J9 FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES
JI Front. Sustain. Cities
PD JAN 24
PY 2024
VL 5
AR 1325039
DI 10.3389/frsc.2023.1325039
PG 17
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology;
   Urban Studies
GA GZ7Z9
UT WOS:001156582800001
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Lasko, K
   ONeill, FD
AF Lasko, Kristofer
   ONeill, Francis D.
TI Automated Method for Artificial Impervious Surface Area Mapping in
   Temperate, Tropical, and Arid Environments Using Hyperlocal Training
   Data With Sentinel-2 Imagery
SO IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE
   SENSING
LA English
DT Article
DE Artificial intelligence; Training data; Indexes; Time series analysis;
   Manuals; Statistics; Sociology; Built-up; global impervious surface area
   (GISA); global manmade impervious surface (GMIS); image classification;
   impervious surface; machine learning; random forest; Sentinel-2;
   spectral indexes
ID BUILT-UP AREA; NIGHTTIME LIGHT; URBAN AREAS; LAND-COVER; EXTRACTION;
   INDEX; MULTISOURCE; SELECTION; EXTENT
AB study presents an automated methodology to generate training data to map up-to-date artificial impervious surface (AIS) extent maps using two dates (winter and nonwinter) of a Sentinel-2 granule across six international sites (Egypt, India, Qatar, U.K., Eastern USA, and Western USA). It uses a series of spectral, textural, and distance decision functions combined with an outdated AIS layer to create nontarget and target binary masks from which to generate a balanced set of training data applied to a random forest classifier. Two outdated global AIS layers (GMIS2010 and GISA-2016) were evaluated within the framework to create AIS maps from more recent years (e.g., 2020). For the decision functions, stepwise threshold adjustments applied to normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and Euclidean distance layers were evaluated on the binary masks (low-density AIS, high-density AIS, and nontarget land covers) with 729 permutations and 115 permutations for global impervious surface area (GISA) and global manmade impervious surface (GMIS), respectively. The optimal thresholds were determined globally (all six scenes), individually (scene) and grouped by climate for adaptive thresholds. The accuracy assessment found both GMIS-output and GISA-output with global thresholds can accurately map current AIS with 86.9% (+/- 1.7%) (GISA) and 82.7% (+/- 2.3%) (GMIS) accuracy. Adaptive climate thresholds yielded slightly higher accuracies for temperate, tropics, and arid scenes. A novel beach bare ground sampling mask and annual NDVI standard deviation were also evaluated for performance and improved the accuracy in 5/6 sites. Lastly, the global GISA output was compared with a manually labeled deep learning model (Esri) with slightly lower overall accuracy (86.9% vs 88.6%).
C1 [Lasko, Kristofer; ONeill, Francis D.] Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Geospatial Res Lab, Alexandria, VA 22315 USA.
C3 United States Department of Defense; United States Army; U.S. Army Corps
   of Engineers; U.S. Army Engineer Research & Development Center (ERDC);
   Geospatial Research Laboratory (GRL)
RP Lasko, K (corresponding author), Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Geospatial Res Lab, Alexandria, VA 22315 USA.
EM Kristofer.D.Lasko@erdc.dren.mil; oneill@erdc.dren.mil
OI Lasko, Kristofer/0000-0001-8980-8943
FU U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
FX No Statement Available
CR Al-Doski J., 2013, IOSR J APPL GEOLOGY, V1, P01, DOI DOI 10.9790/0990-0120110
   Ban YF, 2015, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V103, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.08.004
   Bouhennache R, 2019, GEOCARTO INT, V34, P1531, DOI 10.1080/10106049.2018.1497094
   Bouzekri S, 2015, J INDIAN SOC REMOTE, V43, P867, DOI 10.1007/s12524-015-0460-6
   Breiman L, 2001, MACH LEARN, V45, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Cao H, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10060874
   Chen JY, 2020, EUR J REMOTE SENS, V53, P274, DOI 10.1080/22797254.2020.1820383
   Chini M, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10111833
   Chithra S., 2015, Int. J. Eng. Sci. Invent, V4, P27
   Chowdhury PKR, 2010, J INDIAN SOC REMOTE, V38, P291, DOI 10.1007/s12524-010-0019-5
   Corbane C, 2018, INT J REMOTE SENS, V39, P842, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2017.1392642
   De Colstoun E. B., 2017, Documentation For the Glob. ManMade Impervious Surf. (GMIS) Dataset from Landsat
   Deliry SI, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P6572, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-11007-4
   Ezimand K, 2018, INT J REMOTE SENS, V39, P8428, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2018.1488282
   Fang H, 2019, APPL SCI-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/app9132631
   Feng XX, 2021, IEEE J-STARS, V14, P6974, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3092064
   Forget Y, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10071145
   Gao T, 2023, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V61, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3294241
   Garzelli Andrea, 2021, 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS, P4388, DOI 10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9554493
   Gascon F, 2014, PROC SPIE, V9218, DOI 10.1117/12.2062260
   Gong P, 2019, SCI BULL, V64, P756, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2019.04.024
   Hafner S, 2022, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V280, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113192
   Hu B, 2021, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V10, DOI 10.3390/ijgi10080533
   Hua LZ, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15107947
   Huang X, 2022, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V14, P3649, DOI 10.5194/essd-14-3649-2022
   Huang X, 2022, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102787
   Jarihani AA, 2015, J HYDROL, V524, P489, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.049
   Justiniano EF, 2022, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102791
   Karra Krishna, 2021, 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS, P4704, DOI 10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9553499
   Kaur Rajveer, 2022, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, V15, DOI 10.1007/s12517-022-09688-x
   Koppel K, 2015, INT GEOSCI REMOTE SE, P1175, DOI 10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7325981
   Larkin A, 2016, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V50, P9142, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b02549
   Lasko K, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14174221
   Lasko K, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13224531
   Levin N, 2020, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111443
   Li CC, 2017, SCI BULL, V62, P508, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2017.03.011
   Li CM, 2021, IEEE J-STARS, V14, P3682, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3067325
   Li WM, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P36274, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2903127
   Li XC, 2017, INT J REMOTE SENS, V38, P6030, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2016.1274451
   Li XC, 2015, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V166, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2015.06.007
   Lin YY, 2020, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V242, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111757
   Lisini G, 2018, IEEE J-STARS, V11, P2683, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2017.2782180
   Liu C, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11131571
   Liu JT, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15081976
   Liu JT, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15010136
   Liu K, 2021, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102331
   Liu W, 2022, IEEE J-STARS, V15, P8085, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3206399
   Ma XL, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11212516
   Ma XL, 2017, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/rs9030236
   Myint SW, 2011, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V115, P1145, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2010.12.017
   Mzid N, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13030474
   Olofsson P., 2021, P 2021 IEEE INT GEOS, P1982, DOI [10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9554475, DOI 10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9554475]
   Olofsson P, 2014, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V148, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.015
   Ouyang ZT, 2016, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/rs8100819
   Pedregosa F, 2011, J MACH LEARN RES, V12, P2825
   Pesaresi M, 2011, IEEE J-STARS, V4, P923, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2011.2162579
   Petrushevsky N, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14010036
   Qin YW, 2017, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V124, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.12.011
   Qiu CP, 2020, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V163, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.01.028
   Schneider A, 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/024008
   Schug F, 2020, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V246, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111810
   Sekertekin A, 2018, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V190, DOI 10.1007/s10661-018-6767-3
   Shao ZF, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15102562
   Shi KF, 2014, REMOTE SENS LETT, V5, P358, DOI 10.1080/2150704X.2014.905728
   Shrestha B, 2021, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V193, DOI 10.1007/s10661-021-09321-6
   Slonecker E.T., 2001, REMOTE SENSING REV, V20, P227, DOI DOI 10.1080/02757250109532436
   Small C, 2005, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V96, P277, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2005.02.002
   Su SS, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14143391
   Sun ZC, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11070752
   Sun ZC, 2017, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/rs9090942
   Tan YH, 2018, IEEE J-STARS, V11, P3988, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2871046
   Tang PF, 2020, IEEE J-STARS, V13, P3931, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3004654
   Vadrevu K, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-22834-5
   Wang YL, 2019, IEEE GEOSC REM SEN M, V7, P64, DOI 10.1109/MGRS.2019.2927260
   Wang ZQ, 2015, INT J REMOTE SENS, V36, P1055, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2015.1007250
   Weng QH, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V117, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.030
   Wondrade N, 2014, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V186, P1765, DOI 10.1007/s10661-013-3491-x
   Wu F, 2021, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V262, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112515
   Wu WF, 2023, IEEE J-STARS, V16, P2573, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2023.3250461
   Xu H, 2008, INT J REMOTE SENS, V29, P4269, DOI 10.1080/01431160802039957
   Xu RD, 2018, SENSORS-BASEL, V18, DOI 10.3390/s18092873
   Yu BL, 2018, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V15, P1279, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2018.2830797
   Zha Y, 2003, INT J REMOTE SENS, V24, P583, DOI 10.1080/01431160304987
   Zhang X, 2020, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V12, P1625, DOI 10.5194/essd-12-1625-2020
   Zheng QM, 2021, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V173, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.01.002
   Zízala D, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11242947
NR 86
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 5
U2 11
PU IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
PI PISCATAWAY
PA 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, NJ 08855-4141 USA
SN 1939-1404
EI 2151-1535
J9 IEEE J-STARS
JI IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens.
PY 2024
VL 17
BP 298
EP 314
DI 10.1109/JSTARS.2023.3328301
PG 17
WC Engineering, Electrical & Electronic; Geography, Physical; Remote
   Sensing; Imaging Science & Photographic Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Physical Geography; Remote Sensing; Imaging Science &
   Photographic Technology
GA CD3U8
UT WOS:001123281300034
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Cooke, SJ
   Vermaire, JC
   Baulch, HM
   Birnie-Gauvin, K
   Twardek, WM
   Richardson, JS
AF Cooke, Steven J.
   Vermaire, Jesse C.
   Baulch, Helen M.
   Birnie-Gauvin, Kim
   Twardek, William M.
   Richardson, John S.
TI Our failure to protect the stream and its valley: A call to back off
   from riparian development
SO FRESHWATER SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Biodiversity; climate change; floodplain; fresh water; management;
   riparia
AB Decades ago, Dr Noel Hynes eloquently summarized the inherent interconnectedness of a stream and its valley and made the case that human alteration of the valley would have direct negative consequences for freshwater systems. Currently, the freshwater biodiversity crisis extends across all continents and demands urgent attention from environmental planners, practitioners, and policymakers to protect streams and their valleys. As we work to slow losses of freshwater biodiversity and restore freshwater ecosystems, it is time to revisit the important messages from Hynes. One of the most obvious and immediate actions that could be undertaken is to "back off"-that is, to limit human activity and new development in floodplain and riparian areas immediately adjacent to freshwater systems, including streams, rivers, lakes, and wetlands, while minimizing impacts and risks in areas with existing development. From reducing erosion and flood damage to maintaining cool water temperatures, filtering pollutants, protecting critical habitats, and enabling lateral connectivity, intact riparian zones mitigate many of the threats that degrade freshwater ecosystems. There has been much research to identify optimal setbacks and buffer-strip widths to protect against harm. As such, in many areas, our ability to protect the stream and its valley is not limited by natural science but rather our failure to consistently apply floodplain and riparian regulations and the absence of political will. We are too quick to trade off the environment for short-term economic development. In areas that are already developed, solutions are more complicated but, in many cases, represent a key priority for healing damaged ecosystems and for addressing economic and social risks of vulnerable development. We need to redefine our relationship with freshwater ecosystems, and the first step is to back off and give freshwater ecosystems the opportunity to heal while ensuring that as-of-yet intact riparian areas continue to support freshwater resiliency. In doing so, we will also gain climate adaptive benefits, given that maintaining intact riparian areas is an effective nature-based solution.
C1 [Cooke, Steven J.; Twardek, William M.] Carleton Univ, Dept Biol, Fish Ecol & Conservat Physiol Lab, 1125 Colonel By Dr, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.
   [Cooke, Steven J.; Vermaire, Jesse C.] Carleton Univ, Inst Environm & Interdisciplinary Sci, 1125 Colonel By Dr, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.
   [Cooke, Steven J.; Vermaire, Jesse C.] Carleton Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, 1125 Colonel By Dr, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.
   [Baulch, Helen M.] Univ Saskatchewan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, 105 Adm Pl, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A2, Canada.
   [Birnie-Gauvin, Kim] Danish Tech Univ, Natl Inst Aquat Resources, DK-2800 Kongens, Denmark.
   [Richardson, John S.] Univ British Columbia, Dept Forest & Conservat Sci, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
C3 Carleton University; Carleton University; Carleton University;
   University of Saskatchewan; Technical University of Denmark; University
   of British Columbia
RP Cooke, SJ (corresponding author), Carleton Univ, Dept Biol, Fish Ecol & Conservat Physiol Lab, 1125 Colonel By Dr, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.; Cooke, SJ (corresponding author), Carleton Univ, Inst Environm & Interdisciplinary Sci, 1125 Colonel By Dr, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.; Cooke, SJ (corresponding author), Carleton Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, 1125 Colonel By Dr, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.
EM steven.cooke@carleton.ca; jesse.vermaire@carleton.ca;
   helen.baulch@usask.ca; kbir@aqua.dtu.dk; william.twardek@gmail.com;
   john.richardson@ubc.ca
RI Richardson, John/G-1513-2012; Baulch, Helen/I-9529-2012; Birnie-Gauvin,
   Kim/G-5306-2018; Cooke, Steven/F-4193-2010
OI Baulch, Helen/0000-0001-9018-4998; Cooke, Steven/0000-0002-5407-0659
FU Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Technical
   University of Denmark and Villum Fonden
FX SJC, JCV, HMB, WMT, and JSR are supported by the Natural Sciences and
   Engineering Research Council of Canada. KBG is supported by the
   Technical University of Denmark and Villum Fonden. Chloe Schmidt was
   contracted to create Fig. 2. We are grateful to several anonymous
   referees for providing thoughtful comments on our paper.
CR Abell R, 2019, AQUAT CONSERV, V29, P1022, DOI 10.1002/aqc.3091
   Albert JS, 2021, AMBIO, V50, P85, DOI 10.1007/s13280-020-01318-8
   Amoros C., 2002, FRESHWATER BIOL, V47
   Arthington AH, 2021, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2021.664313
   Baker C. D., 2015, EC COMMUNITY BENEFIT
   Bark R, 2014, WATER POLICY, V16, P739, DOI 10.2166/wp.2014.128
   BARLING RD, 1994, ENVIRON MANAGE, V18, P543, DOI 10.1007/BF02400858
   Bentrup G., 1998, The practical streambank bioengineering guide: user's guide for natural streambank stabilization techniques in the arid and semi-arid great basin and intermountain west
   Biggs R, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P421, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
   Birnie-Gauvin K, 2018, RIVER RES APPL, V34, P548, DOI 10.1002/rra.3271
   Brinson MM, 2002, ENVIRON CONSERV, V29, P115, DOI 10.1017/S0376892902000085
   Burby, 2001, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V3
   Capon SJ, 2013, ECOSYSTEMS, V16, P359, DOI 10.1007/s10021-013-9656-1
   Collins KE, 2013, RESTOR ECOL, V21, P40, DOI 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00859.x
   Cook C. N., 2013, CONSERV BIOL, V27
   Cooke SJ, 2020, BIOL CONSERV, V247, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108589
   Cooke SJ, 2019, CONSERV SCI PRACT, V1, DOI 10.1111/csp2.129
   Cooper J. R., 1987, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V51
   Correll DL, 2005, ECOL ENG, V24, P433, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.01.007
   Cvitanovic C, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V183, P864, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.038
   Dala-Corte RB, 2020, J APPL ECOL, V57, P1391, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.13657
   Dalwani R., 2020, NatureBased Solutions for Resilient Ecosystems and Societies, P231, DOI [10.1007/978-981-15-4712-6_14, DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-4712-6_14]
   Daniels RB, 1996, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V60, P246, DOI 10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000010037x
   Davidson NC, 2014, MAR FRESHWATER RES, V65, P934, DOI 10.1071/MF14173
   Davies PM, 2010, RESTOR ECOL, V18, P261, DOI 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00648.x
   Davis J, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V534, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.127
   de Graaf IEM, 2019, NATURE, V574, P90, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1594-4
   Dixon SJ, 2019, WATER ENVIRON J, V33, P329, DOI 10.1111/wej.12425
   Dodds WK, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P9061, DOI 10.1021/es4021052
   Doody T, 2009, WIT TRANS ECOL ENVIR, V124, P197, DOI 10.2495/RM090181
   Dudgeon D, 2006, BIOL REV, V81, P163, DOI 10.1017/S1464793105006950
   Dudgeon D, 2010, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V2, P422, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.09.001
   Dudley Nigel, 2017, Biodiversity (Ottawa), V18, P45, DOI 10.1080/14888386.2017.1351892
   Eco Logical Australia, 2016, MURR RIV PLANN CONTR
   Entrekin SA, 2019, PHILOS T R SOC B, V374, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2018.0042
   Fang Y, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-08366-z
   Feld C. K., 2011, ADV ECOL RES, V44
   Feld CK, 2018, WATER RES, V139, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2018.04.014
   Gale AP., 2021, ENV REV E 1, DOI 10.1139/er-2021-0040
   González E, 2015, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V158, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.033
   Goss KF, 2003, AUST J BOT, V51, P619, DOI 10.1071/BT03003
   GREGORY SV, 1991, BIOSCIENCE, V41, P540, DOI 10.2307/1311607
   Gurnell A. M., 2016, RIVER RES APPL, V32
   Gurnell A, 2014, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V39, P4, DOI 10.1002/esp.3397
   Hanjra MA, 2010, FOOD POLICY, V35, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.05.006
   Harper M, 2021, AQUAT CONSERV, V31, P2632, DOI 10.1002/aqc.3634
   Harrison I, 2018, SCIENCE, V362, P1369, DOI 10.1126/science.aav9242
   Hart BT, 2016, ECOHYDROL HYDROBIOL, V16, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2016.09.002
   Hart BT, 2016, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V32, P819, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2015.1083847
   Hickey MBC, 2004, WATER QUAL RES J CAN, V39, P311, DOI 10.2166/wqrj.2004.042
   HOLWAY JM, 1990, LAND ECON, V66, P259, DOI 10.2307/3146728
   HOLWAY JM, 1993, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V59, P205, DOI 10.1080/01944369308975869
   Hynes, 1975, INT VEREINIGUNG FR T, V19, P115
   Hynes H. B. N., 1970, ECOLOGY RUNNING WATE, DOI DOI 10.4319/LO.1971.16.3.0593
   ISAB (Independent Scientific Advisory Board), 2011, US COMPR LANDSC APPR
   Jansen A, 2001, J APPL ECOL, V38, P63, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00557.x
   Klijn F, 2018, GEOSCIENCES, V8, DOI 10.3390/geosciences8060224
   Koehn John D., 2012, Endangered Species Research, V16, P165, DOI 10.3354/esr00398
   Krause S, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P6359, DOI 10.1002/2016WR019516
   Kroll SA, 2019, NAT AREA J, V39, P58, DOI 10.3375/043.039.0105
   Kummu M, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0020578
   Lind L, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V249, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109391
   Liu X., 2008, J ENVIRON QUAL, V37
   Longcore T, 2004, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V2, P191, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0191:ELP]2.0.CO;2
   Lovell ST, 2006, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V112, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.002
   LOWRANCE R, 1985, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V40, P87
   Maasri A, 2022, ECOL LETT, V25, P255, DOI 10.1111/ele.13931
   Mace GM, 2012, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V27, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006
   Macklin MG, 2015, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V114, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.02.004
   Mao D., 2018, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V29
   Martinuzzi S, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P113, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12383
   Metrick A, 1998, J ECON PERSPECT, V12, P21, DOI 10.1257/jep.12.3.21
   Mooney C, 2012, J HYDROL, V474, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.010
   Naiman R.J., 2010, RIPARIA ECOLOGY CONS
   Naiman RJ, 1997, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V28, P621, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621
   Naiman RJ, 2013, INLAND WATERS, V3, P391, DOI 10.5268/IW-3.4.667
   Norris V., 1993, Water Resources Management, V7, P257, DOI 10.1007/BF00872284
   Opperman JJ, 2010, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V46, P211, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00426.x
   Osborne L. L., 1993, FRESHWATER BIOL, V29, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1365-2427.1993.TB00761.X
   Parkyn S., 2003, WATER ATMOS, V11, P15
   Parkyn SM, 2003, RESTOR ECOL, V11, P436, DOI 10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.rec0260.x
   Poff B, 2011, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V47, P1241, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00571.x
   Postel S., 1997, NATURES SERVICES SOC, P195214
   Pusey BJ, 2003, MAR FRESHWATER RES, V54, P1, DOI 10.1071/MF02041
   Ralph T. J., 2011, FLOODPLAIN WETLAND B, P116
   Reid AJ, 2019, BIOL REV, V94, P849, DOI 10.1111/brv.12480
   Richardson DM, 2007, DIVERS DISTRIB, V13, P126, DOI 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00314.x
   Richardson JS, 2015, ECOHYDROLOGY, V8, P406, DOI 10.1002/eco.1488
   Richardson JS, 2010, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V67, P1197, DOI 10.1139/F10-063
   Rieman BE, 2015, FISHERIES, V40, P124, DOI 10.1080/03632415.2015.1007205
   Roni P., 2013, STREAM WATERSHED RES
   Seavy N. E., 2009, Ecological Restoration, V27, P330, DOI 10.3368/er.27.3.330
   Shiel RJ, 1998, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V387, P39, DOI 10.1023/A:1017056802001
   Simon A., 2002, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V27
   Strayer DL, 2010, J N AM BENTHOL SOC, V29, P344, DOI 10.1899/08-171.1
   Strayer DL, 2010, AQUAT SCI, V72, P127, DOI 10.1007/s00027-010-0128-9
   Su GH, 2021, SCIENCE, V371, P835, DOI 10.1126/science.abd3369
   Sweeney BW, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P14132, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0405895101
   Thomas-Walters L, 2021, CONSERV SCI PRACT, V3, DOI 10.1111/csp2.426
   Tickner D, 2020, BIOSCIENCE, V70, P330, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biaa002
   Tockner K, 2010, FRESHWATER BIOL, V55, P135, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02371.x
   Twardek WM, 2021, CONSERV SCI PRACT, V3, DOI 10.1111/csp2.467
   UusiKamppa J, 1996, WETLANDS, P221
   VANNOTE RL, 1980, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V37, P130, DOI 10.1139/f80-017
   VOUGHT LBM, 1995, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V31, P323, DOI 10.1016/0169-2046(94)01057-F
   Walsh JC, 2015, CONSERV BIOL, V29, P88, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12370
   Wei Y., 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21
   Wenger S., 1999, A review of the scientific literature on riparian buffer width, extent and vegetation
   Xia J, 2017, SCI CHINA EARTH SCI, V60, P652, DOI 10.1007/s11430-016-0111-8
   Yates AG, 2006, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V114, P257, DOI 10.1007/s10661-006-4779-x
   Zhang XY, 2010, J ENVIRON QUAL, V39, P76, DOI 10.2134/jeq2008.0496
NR 111
TC 8
Z9 9
U1 1
U2 24
PU UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
PI CHICAGO
PA 1427 E 60TH ST, CHICAGO, IL 60637-2954 USA
SN 2161-9549
EI 2161-9565
J9 FRESHW SCI
JI Freshw. Sci.
PD JUN 1
PY 2022
VL 41
IS 2
BP 183
EP 194
DI 10.1086/719958
EA JUN 2022
PG 12
WC Ecology; Marine & Freshwater Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Marine & Freshwater Biology
GA 3D7ON
UT WOS:000793605400001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Shen, YW
   Tahvildari, N
   Morsy, MM
   Huxley, C
   Chen, TD
   Goodall, JL
AF Shen, Yawen
   Tahvildari, Navid
   Morsy, Mohamed M.
   Huxley, Chris
   Chen, T. Donna
   Goodall, Jonathan Lee
TI Dynamic Modeling of Inland Flooding and Storm Surge on Coastal Cities
   under Climate Change Scenarios: Transportation Infrastructure Impacts in
   Norfolk, Virginia USA as a Case Study
SO GEOSCIENCES
LA English
DT Article
DE coastal flooding; urban hydrology; storm surge; climate change; sea
   level rise; combined flood impact
ID SEA-LEVEL RISE; RAINFALL; INUNDATION; TIDES
AB Low-lying coastal cities across the world are vulnerable to the combined impact of rainfall and storm tide. However, existing approaches lack the ability to model the combined effect of these flood mechanisms, especially under climate change and sea level rise (SLR). Thus, to increase flood resilience of coastal cities, modeling techniques to improve the understanding and prediction of the combined effect of these flood hazards are critical. To address this need, this study presents a modeling system for assessing the combined flood impact on coastal cities under selected future climate scenarios that leverages ocean modeling with land surface modeling capable of resolving urban drainage infrastructure within the city. The modeling approach is demonstrated in quantifying the impact of possible future climate scenarios on transportation infrastructure within Norfolk, Virginia, USA. A series of combined storm events are modeled for current (2020) and projected future (2070) climate scenarios. The results show that pluvial flooding causes a larger interruption to the transportation network compared to tidal flooding under current climate conditions. By 2070, however, tidal flooding will be the dominant flooding mechanism with even nuisance flooding expected to happen daily due to SLR. In 2070, nuisance flooding is expected to cause a 4.6% total link close time (TLC), which is more than two times that of a 50-year storm surge (1.8% TLC) in 2020. The coupled flood model was compared with a widely used but physically simplistic bathtub method to assess the difference resulting from the more complex modeling presented in this study. The results show that the bathtub method overestimated the flooded area near the shoreline by 9.5% and 3.1% for a 10-year storm surge event in 2020 and 2070, respectively, but underestimated the flooded area in the inland region by 9.0% and 4.0% for the same events. The findings demonstrate the benefit of sophisticated modeling methods compared to more simplistic bathtub approaches, in climate adaptive planning and policy in coastal communities.
C1 [Shen, Yawen; Chen, T. Donna; Goodall, Jonathan Lee] Univ Virginia, Dept Engn Syst & Environm, Olsson Hall, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA.
   [Tahvildari, Navid] Old Dominion Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA.
   [Morsy, Mohamed M.] Cairo Univ, Fac Engn, Irrigat & Hydraul Engn Dept, Giza 12614, Egypt.
   [Huxley, Chris] BTM WBM Pty Ltd, Level 8,200 Creek St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia.
C3 University of Virginia; Old Dominion University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank
   (EKB); Cairo University
RP Goodall, JL (corresponding author), Univ Virginia, Dept Engn Syst & Environm, Olsson Hall, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA.
EM ys5dv@virginia.edu; ntahvild@odu.edu; mmm4dh@virginia.edu;
   chris.huxley@tuflow.com; tdchen@virginia.edu; goodall@virginia.edu
RI Morsy, Mohamed/AFB-3219-2022; Goodall, Jonathan/B-3663-2009
OI Goodall, Jonathan/0000-0002-1112-4522; Morsy,
   Mohamed/0000-0001-9217-4822; Tahvildari, Navid/0000-0001-9922-129X
FU National Science Foundation [1735587, 1951745]; Directorate For
   Engineering; Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1951745] Funding
   Source: National Science Foundation; Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp
   Sys; Directorate For Engineering [1735587] Funding Source: National
   Science Foundation
FX This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under the
   award number 1735587 and 1951745.
CR Aerts JCJH, 2014, SCIENCE, V344, P472, DOI 10.1126/science.1248222
   [Anonymous], 2017, P 2 INT WORKSH SCI S, P13, DOI [10.1145/3063386.3063764, DOI 10.1145/3063386.3063764]
   [Anonymous], 2008, OECD ENV WORKING PAP, DOI [DOI 10.1787/011766488208, 10.1787/011766488208., 10.1787/011766488208]
   [Anonymous], 2001, P IEAUST WAT PAN SEM
   Arnbjerg-Nielsen K, 2013, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V68, P16, DOI 10.2166/wst.2013.251
   Avila L. A., 2011, TROPICAL CYCLONE REP
   Bacopoulos P, 2017, J HYDROL ENG, V22, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001539
   Batten B., 2017, JOINT OCCURRENCE PRO
   Bi EG, 2017, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V127, P685, DOI 10.1007/s00704-015-1656-y
   Bonnin G.M., 2006, NOAA ATLAS 14 PREC F, V2
   Boon JD, 2012, J COASTAL RES, V28, P1437, DOI 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-12-00102.1
   Burgos AG, 2018, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V45, P12432, DOI 10.1029/2018GL079572
   Castrucci L, 2018, MAR TECHNOL SOC J, V52, P92, DOI 10.4031/MTSJ.52.2.11
   CORDEX, 2019, CORDEX CLIM DAT ARCH
   Dawson D, 2016, J TRANSP GEOGR, V51, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.11.009
   Dewberry, 2014, USGS NORF VA LIDA RE
   Egbert GD, 2002, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V19, P183, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<0183:EIMOBO>2.0.CO;2
   Ezer T, 2014, EARTHS FUTURE, V2, P362, DOI 10.1002/2014EF000252
   Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2017, FLOOD INS STUD CITY
   Fohringer J, 2015, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V15, P2725, DOI 10.5194/nhess-15-2725-2015
   Gallien TW, 2014, COAST ENG, V91, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.04.007
   Hallegatte S, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P802, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1979, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1979]
   Hanson S, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P89, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9977-4
   Jacobs JM, 2018, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2672, P1, DOI 10.1177/0361198118756366
   Karamouz M, 2017, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V76, DOI 10.1007/s12665-017-6722-6
   Kopp RE, 2013, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V40, P3981, DOI 10.1002/grl.50781
   Merkel W.H., 2019, Design Rainfall Distributions Based on NOAA Atlas 14 Rainfall Depths and Durations
   Middleton SE, 2014, IEEE INTELL SYST, V29, P9, DOI 10.1109/MIS.2013.126
   Mignot E, 2019, J HYDROL, V568, P334, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.001
   Moftakhari HR, 2015, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V42, P9846, DOI 10.1002/2015GL066072
   Morsy M.M., 2019, Incorporating Potential Climate Change Impacts in Bridge and Culvert Design
   Morsy MM, 2018, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V107, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.05.007
   Neumann JE, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V131, P97, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-1037-4
   Powers D.M., 2011, arXiv
   Ramirez JA, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, P571, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2198-z
   Ray T, 2011, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V137, P1103, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000398
   Sadler JM, 2017, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V23, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000397
   Shen YW, 2019, J HYDROL, V579, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124159
   Silva-Araya WF, 2018, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V5, DOI 10.3390/hydrology5010013
   Smith RAE, 2012, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V30, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.008
   Suarez P, 2005, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V10, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2005.04.007
   Sweet W., 2017, TECHNICAL REPORT NOA
   Sweet WV, 2016, Supplement to State of the Climate: National Overview for May 2017
   Tahvildari N, 2022, NAT HAZARDS REV, V23, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000524
   Tahvildari N, 2021, NAT HAZARDS REV, V22, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000412
   Wahl T, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P1093, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2736, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2736]
   Xu HS, 2019, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V33, P1249, DOI 10.1007/s00477-019-01695-x
   Xu K, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0109341
   Yin J, 2017, J HYDROL, V555, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.067
   Yin J, 2016, J HYDROL, V537, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.037
NR 50
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 2
U2 25
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2076-3263
J9 GEOSCIENCES
JI Geosciences
PD JUN
PY 2022
VL 12
IS 6
AR 224
DI 10.3390/geosciences12060224
PG 24
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Geology
GA 2K2XE
UT WOS:000816204600001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Cacho, NI
   McIntyre, PJ
   Kliebenstein, DJ
   Strauss, SY
AF Cacho, N. Ivalu
   McIntyre, Patrick J.
   Kliebenstein, Daniel J.
   Strauss, Sharon Y.
TI Genome size evolution is associated with climate seasonality and
   glucosinolates, but not life history, soil nutrients or range size,
   across a clade of mustards
SO ANNALS OF BOTANY
LA English
DT Article
DE Brassicaceae; climate; glucosinolates; plant defence; range size;
   seasonality; soil chemistry; Streptanthus
ID NUCLEAR-DNA CONTENT; CHROMOSOME-NUMBER; ENVIRONMENTAL-FACTORS;
   PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL; GROWTH-RATE; SEED SIZE; PLANTS; DEFENSE; WILD;
   ARABIDOPSIS
AB Background and Aims We investigate patterns of evolution of genome size across a morphologically and ecologically diverse clade of Brassicaceae, in relation to ecological and life history traits. While numerous hypotheses have been put forward regarding autecological and environmental factors that could favour small vs. large genomes, a challenge in understanding genome size evolution in plants is that many hypothesized selective agents are intercorrelated.
   Methods We contribute genome size estimates for 47 species of Streptanthus Nutt. and close relatives, and take advantage of many data collections for this group to assemble data on climate, life history, soil affinity and composition, geographic range and plant secondary chemistry to identify simultaneous correlates of variation in genome size in an evolutionary framework. We assess models of evolution across clades and use phylogenetically informed analyses as well as model selection and information criteria approaches to identify variables that can best explain genome size variation in this clade.
   Key Results We find differences in genome size and heterogeneity in its rate of evolution across subclades of Streptanthus and close relatives. We show that clade-wide genome size is positively associated with climate seasonality and glucosinolate compounds. Model selection and information criteria approaches identify a best model that includes temperature seasonality and fraction of aliphatic glucosinolates, suggesting a possible role for genome size in climatic adaptation or a role for biotic interactions in shaping the evolution of genome size. We find no evidence supporting hypotheses of life history, range size or soil nutrients as forces shaping genome size in this system.
   Conclusions Our findings suggest climate seasonality and biotic interactions as potential forces shaping the evolution of genome size and highlight the importance of evaluating multiple factors in the context of phylogeny to understand the effect of possible selective agents on genome size.
C1 [Cacho, N. Ivalu] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Biol, Ciudad Univ, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico.
   [Cacho, N. Ivalu; McIntyre, Patrick J.; Strauss, Sharon Y.] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Populat Biol, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
   [Cacho, N. Ivalu] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Evolut Ecol, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
   [McIntyre, Patrick J.] NatureServe, 1680 38th St,Suite 120, Boulder, CO 80301 USA.
   [Kliebenstein, Daniel J.] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
   [Kliebenstein, Daniel J.] Univ Copenhagen, DynaMo Ctr Excellence, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871 C Frederiksberg, Denmark.
C3 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico; University of California
   System; University of California Davis; University of California System;
   University of California Davis; University of California System;
   University of California Davis; University of Copenhagen
RP Cacho, NI (corresponding author), Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Biol, Ciudad Univ, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico.; Cacho, NI (corresponding author), Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Populat Biol, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA.; Cacho, NI (corresponding author), Univ Calif Davis, Dept Evolut Ecol, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
EM ivalu.cacho@gmail.com
RI Strauss, Sharon/J-1827-2012
FU National Science Foundation [0919559]; Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y
   Tecnologia (Conacyt) [187083]; program UNAM-DGAPA-PAPIIT [IA201516];
   Direct For Biological Sciences [0919559] Funding Source: National
   Science Foundation; Division Of Environmental Biology [0919559] Funding
   Source: National Science Foundation
FX This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (DEB #0919559
   to S.Y.S.), the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (Conacyt
   #187083 to N.I.C.) and the program UNAM-DGAPA-PAPIIT (award IA201516 to
   N.I.C.).
CR Al-Shehbaz IA, 2010, FLORA N AM N MEXICO, P224
   Alonso C, 2015, FRONT GENET, V6, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2015.00004
   [Anonymous], 2002, Information and Likelihood Theory: A Basis for Model Selection and Inference
   [Anonymous], 1994, Plant allometry: The scaling of form and process
   [Anonymous], 2012, The Jepson manual: vascular plants of California, DOI DOI 10.5860/CHOICE.49-6882
   Bainard JD, 2012, NEW PHYTOL, V196, P1240, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04370.x
   Baldwin BG, 2014, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V45, P347, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135847
   Barrett CF, 2019, GENOME BIOL EVOL, V11, P1501, DOI 10.1093/gbe/evz092
   Beaulieu J.M., 2020, OUWIE ANAL EVOLUTION
   Beaulieu JM, 2007, NEW PHYTOL, V173, P422, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01919.x
   Bennett MD, 2003, ANN BOT-LONDON, V91, P547, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcg057
   BENNETT MD, 1987, NEW PHYTOL, V106, P177, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb04689.x
   Bilinski P, 2018, PLOS GENET, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007162
   Bivand R., 2013, RGEOS INTERFACE GEOM
   Blomberg SP, 2003, EVOLUTION, V57, P717, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x
   Borregaard MK, 2010, Q REV BIOL, V85, P3, DOI 10.1086/650265
   Bottini MCJ, 2000, ANN BOT-LONDON, V86, P565, DOI 10.1006/anbo.2000.1218
   BROWN JH, 1984, AM NAT, V124, P255, DOI 10.1086/284267
   Caceres ME, 1998, THEOR APPL GENET, V96, P559, DOI 10.1007/s001220050774
   Cacho NI, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V208, P915, DOI 10.1111/nph.13561
   Cacho NI, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P15132, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1409242111
   Cacho NI, 2014, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V72, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.11.018
   Cappa JJ, 2014, AM J BOT, V101, P830, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1400041
   CASTROJIMENEZ Y, 1989, AM J BOT, V76, P789, DOI 10.2307/2444535
   Cerbah M, 1999, HEREDITY, V82, P261, DOI 10.1038/sj.hdy.6884690
   Clark J, 2016, NEW PHYTOL, V210, P1072, DOI 10.1111/nph.13833
   Martínez-Ballesta MD, 2013, INT J MOL SCI, V14, P11607, DOI 10.3390/ijms140611607
   Díez CM, 2013, NEW PHYTOL, V199, P264, DOI 10.1111/nph.12247
   Dodsworth S, 2015, SYST BIOL, V64, P112, DOI 10.1093/sysbio/syu080
   Dolezel J, 2007, NAT PROTOC, V2, P2233, DOI 10.1038/nprot.2007.310
   Dusková E, 2010, PRESLIA, V82, P127
   Edger PP, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P8362, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1503926112
   EHRLICH PR, 1964, EVOLUTION, V18, P586, DOI 10.2307/2406212
   Enke N, 2011, PLANT BIOLOGY, V13, P185, DOI 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00341.x
   Fawcett J.A., 2013, PLANT GENOME DIVERSI, V2, P277
   Fick SE, 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P4302, DOI 10.1002/joc.5086
   Fleischmann A, 2014, ANN BOT-LONDON, V114, P1651, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcu189
   GARNIER E, 1992, J ECOL, V80, P665, DOI 10.2307/2260858
   Gaston KJ, 1996, OIKOS, V76, P211, DOI 10.2307/3546192
   GRAFEN A, 1989, PHILOS T R SOC B, V326, P119, DOI 10.1098/rstb.1989.0106
   Greilhuber J, 2005, ANN BOT-LONDON, V95, P255, DOI 10.1093/aob/mci019
   GRIME JP, 1982, NATURE, V299, P151, DOI 10.1038/299151a0
   GRIME JP, 1975, J ECOL, V63, P393, DOI 10.2307/2258728
   Grotkopp E, 2004, EVOLUTION, V58, P1705, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00456.x
   Guignard MS, 2019, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V286, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2018.2619
   Guignard MS, 2016, NEW PHYTOL, V210, P1195, DOI 10.1111/nph.13881
   Hanson L, 2001, ANN BOT-LONDON, V87, P251, DOI 10.1006/anbo.2000.1325
   Harmon LJ, 2008, BIOINFORMATICS, V24, P129, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm538
   Haugen R, 2008, OIKOS, V117, P231, DOI 10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16111.x
   Hijmans R.J., 2013, dismo: Species distribution modeling. R package version 0.8-17
   Ho LST, 2014, SYST BIOL, V63, P397, DOI 10.1093/sysbio/syu005
   Hopkins RJ, 2009, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V54, P57, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090623
   Janz N, 2011, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V42, P71, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145024
   Jedrzejczyk I., 2010, J BOT, V2010, P1, DOI DOI 10.1155/2010/930895
   Johnson CN, 1998, NATURE, V394, P272, DOI 10.1038/28385
   Kalendar R, 2000, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V97, P6603, DOI 10.1073/pnas.110587497
   Kelly LJ, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V208, P596, DOI 10.1111/nph.13471
   Kembel SW, 2010, BIOINFORMATICS, V26, P1463, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq166
   Kliebenstein DJ, 2005, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V8, P264, DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.03.002
   Kliebenstein DJ, 2001, PLANT CELL, V13, P681, DOI 10.1105/tpc.13.3.681
   Knight CA, 2005, ANN BOT-LONDON, V95, P177, DOI 10.1093/aob/mci011
   Knight CA, 2002, ECOL LETT, V5, P66, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00283.x
   Knight CA, 2008, ANN BOT-LONDON, V101, P759, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcm321
   Kwan JC, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P20655, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1213820109
   Lavergne S, 2010, ANN BOT-LONDON, V105, P109, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcp271
   Leitch AR, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P481, DOI 10.1126/science.1153585
   Leitch I.J., 2019, ANGIOSPERM DNA C VAL
   Leitch IJ, 2004, BIOL J LINN SOC, V82, P651, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00349.x
   Lynch M, 2003, SCIENCE, V302, P1401, DOI 10.1126/science.1089370
   Lysak MA, 2009, MOL BIOL EVOL, V26, P85, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msn223
   MACGILLIVRAY CW, 1995, FUNCT ECOL, V9, P320, DOI 10.2307/2390580
   McIntyre PJ, 2012, ANN BOT-LONDON, V110, P1195, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcs187
   Messing J, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P14349, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0406163101
   MOWFORTH MA, 1989, FUNCT ECOL, V3, P289, DOI 10.2307/2389368
   Müller LLB, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-41474-w
   Nakazato T, 2010, AM J BOT, V97, P680, DOI 10.3732/ajb.0900216
   O'Meara BC, 2006, EVOLUTION, V60, P922
   Oliver MJ, 2007, GENOME RES, V17, P594, DOI 10.1101/gr.6096207
   Orne D., 2013, caper: comparative analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R. R package
   Pandit MK, 2014, NEW PHYTOL, V203, P697, DOI 10.1111/nph.12799
   Pellicer J, 2018, GENES-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/genes9020088
   Pellicer J, 2010, BOT J LINN SOC, V164, P10, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01072.x
   Piegu B, 2006, GENOME RES, V16, P1262, DOI 10.1101/gr.5290206
   PRICE HJ, 1975, AM J BOT, V62, P262, DOI 10.2307/2441860
   PRICE HJ, 1981, BOT GAZ, V142, P415, DOI 10.1086/337241
   Qiu F, 2019, NEW PHYTOL, V221, P1609, DOI 10.1111/nph.15465
   R Core Team, 2022, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
   Reichelt M, 2002, PHYTOCHEMISTRY, V59, P663, DOI 10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00014-6
   Revell LJ, 2012, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V3, P217, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x
   Rollins RC., 1993, CRUCIFERAE CONTINENT
   Salehin M, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-12002-1
   Sato Y, 2019, FRONT GENET, V10, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2019.00787
   Schmidt JP, 2017, ECOL EVOL, V7, P10289, DOI 10.1002/ece3.3505
   Schmuths H, 2004, ANN BOT-LONDON, V93, P317, DOI 10.1093/aob/mch037
   SHAPIRO AM, 1981, OECOLOGIA, V48, P142, DOI 10.1007/BF00347003
   Simonin KA, 2018, PLOS BIOL, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003706
   Sliwinska E, 2005, CYTOM PART A, V64A, P72, DOI 10.1002/cyto.a.20122
   Smarda P, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, pE4096, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1321152111
   Smarda P, 2013, NEW PHYTOL, V200, P911, DOI 10.1111/nph.12399
   Soltis DE, 2003, AM J BOT, V90, P1596, DOI 10.3732/ajb.90.11.1596
   Soltis P. S., 2013, Plant Genome Diversity Volume 2: Physical Structure, Behaviour and Evolution of Plant Genomes, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-3-7091-1160-41, DOI 10.1007/978-3-7091-1160-41]
   Souza G, 2019, PERSPECT PLANT ECOL, V38, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.ppees.2019.03.002
   Strauss SY, 2015, ENTOMOL EXP APPL, V157, P74, DOI 10.1111/eea.12347
   Strauss SY, 2013, AM NAT, V182, pE1, DOI 10.1086/670754
   Streiner DL, 2015, AM J CLIN NUTR, V102, P721, DOI 10.3945/ajcn.115.113548
   Suda J, 2003, ANN BOT-LONDON, V92, P153, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcg104
   Textor S, 2009, PHYTOCHEM REV, V8, P149, DOI 10.1007/s11101-008-9117-1
   THOMPSON K, 1990, EVOL TREND PLANT, V4, P113
   Torrell M, 2001, GENOME, V44, P231, DOI 10.1139/gen-44-2-231
   Trávnícek P, 2019, NEW PHYTOL, V224, P1642, DOI 10.1111/nph.15996
   Turnbull LA, 2012, ECOLOGY, V93, P1283, DOI 10.1890/11-0261.1
   VANTHOF J, 1963, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V49, P897, DOI 10.1073/pnas.49.6.897
   Vesely P, 2012, ANN BOT-LONDON, V109, P65, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcr267
   Vinogradov AE, 2003, TRENDS GENET, V19, P609, DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2003.09.010
   WAKAMIYA I, 1993, AM J BOT, V80, P1235, DOI 10.2307/2445706
   Wang XY, 2005, NEW PHYTOL, V165, P937, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01293.x
   Warwick SI, 2006, PLANT SYST EVOL, V259, P237, DOI 10.1007/s00606-006-0421-1
   Watanabe K, 1999, J PLANT RES, V112, P145, DOI 10.1007/PL00013869
   Weber MG, 2018, EVOLUTION, V72, P798, DOI 10.1111/evo.13456
   Wendel JF, 2002, MOL BIOL EVOL, V19, P2346, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004062
   Wendel JF, 2016, GENOME BIOL, V17, DOI 10.1186/s13059-016-0908-1
   Wendel JF, 2015, AM J BOT, V102, P1753, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1500320
   Whitney KD, 2010, EVOLUTION, V64, P2097, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00967.x
   Zenil-Ferguson R, 2016, AM J BOT, V103, P1175, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1500408
NR 124
TC 16
Z9 19
U1 8
U2 40
PU OXFORD UNIV PRESS
PI OXFORD
PA GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND
SN 0305-7364
EI 1095-8290
J9 ANN BOT-LONDON
JI Ann. Bot.
PD JUN 4
PY 2021
VL 127
IS 7
BP 887
EP 902
DI 10.1093/aob/mcab028
PG 16
WC Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences
GA YS7LP
UT WOS:000750854300006
PM 33675229
OA Bronze, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Jagustovic, R
   Papachristos, G
   Zougmoré, RB
   Kotir, JH
   Kessler, A
   Ouédraogo, M
   Ritsema, CJ
   Dittmer, KM
AF Jagustovic, Renata
   Papachristos, George
   Zougmore, Robert B.
   Kotir, Julius H.
   Kessler, Aad
   Ouedraogo, Mathieu
   Ritsema, Coen J.
   Dittmer, Kyle M.
TI Better before worse trajectories in food systems? An investigation of
   synergies and trade-offs through climate-smart agriculture and system
   dynamics
SO AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; Food security; Smallholder agriculture; Systems
   thinking; System dynamics modelling; West Africa
ID WATER-RESOURCES; WEST-AFRICA; MAIZE; YIELD; FARMERS; GHANA; ADAPTATION;
   MANAGEMENT; IMPACTS; LESSONS
AB CONTEXT: Food systems face multiple challenges simultaneously: provision to a growing population, adaptation to more extreme and frequent climate change risks, and reduction of their considerable greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Food system interventions and policies give rise to synergies and trade-offs that emerge over time due to the dynamic nature and interconnections of system elements. Analysis of an entire food system is necessary to identify synergies that bring simultaneous benefits and mitigate trade-offs, both short-and long-term.
   OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to inform the sustainable transformation of food systems by identifying short-and long-term synergies and trade-offs in the climate-smart village (CSV) Lawra-Jirapa in northern Ghana under the current practices, technologies, policies, and trends of population growth, extreme events, and climate change impacts.
   METHODS: We develop a system dynamics model to simulate the food system in the CSV between 2011 and 2060. We apply the climate-smart agriculture (CSA) approach as a diagnostic tool to the CSV system to reveal the short-and long-term trade-offs and synergies between the CSA goals. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The simulation results reveal short-term progress towards the goal of increased productivity and income, with trade-offs in the goals of GHG removal, climate adaptation, and resilience. In the long term, post-2035, current agriculture practices, technologies, and policies inside and outside the CSV boundaries result in trade-offs across all three CSA goals, and progress made towards these goals is reversed. The CSV system behaviour, thus, exhibits a "better before worse" pattern.
   SIGNIFICANCE: The analysis demonstrates an approach, which considers simultaneously all three CSA goals, to identify synergies and mitigate trade-offs in an entire food system. The findings suggest that understanding the dynamics of food systems is a precursor to their sustainable transformation. This transformation will entail changes to the food system's goals and structure with equal attention to short-and long-term outcomes.
C1 [Jagustovic, Renata; Kessler, Aad; Ritsema, Coen J.] Wageningen Univ & Res, Dept Environm Sci, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands.
   [Papachristos, George] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Innovat Sci, POB 513, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands.
   [Zougmore, Robert B.; Ouedraogo, Mathieu] Int Crops Res Inst Semi Arid Trop, CGIAR Res Program Climate Change Agr & Food Secur, BP 320, Bamako, Mali.
   [Kotir, Julius H.] CSIRO Agr & Food, POB 203, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia.
   [Dittmer, Kyle M.] Alliance Biovers Int, Cali, Colombia.
   [Dittmer, Kyle M.] Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Cali, Colombia.
C3 Wageningen University & Research; Eindhoven University of Technology;
   CGIAR; International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid-Tropics
   (ICRISAT); Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation
   (CSIRO); Alliance; International Center for Tropical Agriculture - CIAT
RP Jagustovic, R (corresponding author), Wageningen Univ & Res, Dept Environm Sci, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands.
EM renata.jagustovic@wur.nl
RI Kessler, Aad/B-6163-2014
OI Kotir, Julius Harrison/0000-0001-8536-9146; Zougmore,
   Robert/0000-0002-6215-4852
FU CGIAR; CGIAR Fund Council; European Union; USAID; AustraliaACIAR;
   International Fund for Agricultural DevelopmentIFAD
FX This work was implemented as part of the CGIAR Research Program on
   Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) , which is carried
   out with support from the CGIAR Fund Donors and through several
   bilateral funding agreements (the CGIAR Fund Council, AustraliaACIAR,
   European Union, International Fund for Agricultural DevelopmentIFAD,
   Ireland, New Zealand, Netherlands, Switzerland, USAID, UK, and Thailand)
   . For details, please visit https://ccafs.cgiar. org/donors. We thank
   women and men farmers in DoggohJirapa and CCAFS scientists for
   participating in the systems thinking sessions and the staff of the
   CSIR-SARI and of the Ministry of Food and Agriculture Department in
   Jirapa for providing logistical onsite support and translation services
   during the field data collection.
CR Aggarwal PK, 2018, ECOL SOC, V23, DOI 10.5751/ES-09844-230114
   AGRA, 2017, Africa Agriculture Status Report: the Business of Smallholder Agriculture in Sub-saharan Africa, P180
   Amadei B., 2019, Systems approach to modeling the water-energy-land-food nexus. Volume II: system dynamics modeling and dynamic scenario planning
   [Anonymous], 1994, 1994 INT SYST DYN C
   [Anonymous], 2011, UKSS 15 INT C FUT SY
   [Anonymous], 1980, TIMS Studies in the Manag. Sci.
   Antwi-Agyei P, 2012, APPL GEOGR, V32, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.06.010
   Asare-Nuamah P, 2019, HELIYON, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02654
   Atuoye KN, 2017, INT MIGR, V55, P18, DOI 10.1111/imig.12310
   Bala BK, 2017, SPRING TEXT BUS ECON, P149, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-2045-2_7
   Bardi Ugo., 2011, The Limits to Growth Revisited
   Boote K.J, 2019, SENSITIVITY MAIZE YI
   Bua S., 2020, YIELD RESPONSES MAIZ
   Buah S.S.J., 2017, Agric. Food Secur, V6, P1, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40066-017-0094-8
   Cabrera D, 2008, EVAL PROGRAM PLANN, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.04.001
   Cabrera D, 2015, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V32, P534, DOI 10.1002/sres.2351
   Challinor AJ, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P287, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2153, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2153]
   Chapman A, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V559, P326, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.162
   Clancy Timothy, 2018, IEEE Engineering Management Review, V46, P32, DOI 10.1109/EMR.2018.2844377
   Dakurah G, 2018, THESIS U READING
   Deryng D, 2011, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V25, DOI 10.1029/2009GB003765
   Diao X., 2007, COST IMPLICATIONS AG, DOI [10.22004/ag.econ.42416, DOI 10.22004/AG.ECON.42416]
   Elsawah S, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V93, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.03.001
   Fader M, 2018, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V6, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00112
   FAO, 2017, The Future of Food and Agriculture: Trends and Challenges
   FAO, 2017, FRAM KEY MESS MON EV
   FAO, 2019, Smart and Sustainable Agriculture
   Ford DN, 1998, SYST DYNAM REV, V14, P309, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199824)14:4<309::AID-SDR154>3.0.CO;2-5
   Forrester J. W., 1961, Industrial dynamics
   Herrero, 2019, FOOD SECURITY, P1
   Hochman Z, 2017, AGR SYST, V151, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.11.007
   Holtz G., 2015, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., V17, P45
   Houssou N., 2016, IFPRI discussion paper 01499
   Inam A, 2015, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V152, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.052
   Jagustovic R, 2019, AGR SYST, V171, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.12.008
   Jayne TS, 2018, FOOD POLICY, V75, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.01.003
   Jones PG, 2003, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V13, P51, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00090-0
   Kankam-Boadu I., 2018, Artic Int J Dev Res, V8, P22861
   Karslen R, 2019, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V31, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.006
   Kermah M., 2020, SUSTAINABLE INTENSIF
   Kim D.H., 1998, Systems archetype basics
   Klutse NAB, 2020, SN APPL SCI, V2, DOI 10.1007/s42452-020-3095-3
   Köhler J, 2018, JASSS-J ARTIF SOC S, V21, DOI 10.18564/jasss.3629
   Koffi D, 2020, J INTEGR PEST MANAG, V11, DOI 10.1093/jipm/pmaa015
   Kotir JH, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V573, P444, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.081
   Kranjac-Berisavljevic G, 2014, J DISASTER RES, V9, P468, DOI 10.20965/jdr.2014.p0468
   Kugbe JX, 2019, COGENT FOOD AGR, V5, DOI 10.1080/23311932.2019.1700030
   Lacombe G, 2012, HYDROLOG SCI J, V57, P1594, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2012.728291
   Langsdale SM, 2009, J WATER RES PL-ASCE, V135, P373, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:5(373)
   Leitner S, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V47, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.018
   Lipper L, 2018, CLIMATE SMART AGR NA
   Lobell DB, 2011, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V1, P42, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1043, 10.1038/nclimate1043]
   Malley J., 2019, FOOD SECURITY CLIMAT
   Mangnus E, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10103605
   Martinez-Baron D, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V31, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.013
   Masih I, 2014, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V18, P3635, DOI 10.5194/hess-18-3635-2014
   McSweeney C., 2008, UNPD Climate Change Country Profiles: Pakistan, P27
   Mollona E, 2015, RETHINKING FOOD SECU
   Monasterolo I, 2016, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V6, DOI 10.3390/agriculture6030044
   Muetzelfeldt R, 2010, CGIAR RES PROGR CLIM, V27
   Naab J. B., 2011, CGIAR RES PROGRAM CL
   Ndamani F, 2016, SCI AGR, V73, P201
   Ngmentoma H, 2016, NATURAL RESOURCED LA, P72
   Nimako S.A., 2019, ANAL EFFECTS FERTILI
   Nyantakyi-Frimpong H, 2015, AFR GEOGR REV, V34, P13, DOI 10.1080/19376812.2014.929971
   Papachristos G, 2011, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V1, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2011.10.001
   Papachristos G, 2020, ROU STUD SUST TRANS, P119
   Papachristos G, 2019, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V31, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2018.10.001
   Papachristos G, 2018, FUTURES, V98, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2018.02.006
   Papachristos G, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V108, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.007
   Papachristos G, 2014, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V26, P1037, DOI 10.1080/09537325.2014.944148
   Partey ST, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V187, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.199
   Pradhan P, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P1169, DOI 10.1002/2017EF000632
   Pradhan P, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0129487
   Ragasa C, 2018, WORLD DEV, V102, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.09.008
   Rahmandad H, 2012, SYST DYNAM REV, V28, P396, DOI 10.1002/sdr.1481
   RamirezMendoza JMF, 2015, COLECCION OPERA PRIM, P1
   Reynolds M., 2016, Systems Thinking Foundation, Uses and Challenges, P3
   Riba A., 2019, CCAFS MIDLINE SYNTHE
   Richardson GP, 2011, SYST DYNAM REV, V27, P219, DOI 10.1002/sdr.462
   Richardson GP, 1996, SYST DYNAM REV, V12, P141, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199622)12:2<141::AID-SDR101>3.0.CO;2-O
   Rosenzweig C, 2020, NAT FOOD, V1, P94, DOI 10.1038/s43016-020-0031-z
   Saj S, 2017, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V250, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2017.09.003
   Scheiterle L, 2019, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V50, P479, DOI 10.1111/agec.12504
   Stage J., 2012, ENV DEV NUDGING BOSE
   Steenwerth KL., 2014, Agric Food Secur, V3, P1, DOI [10.1186/2048-7010-3-11, DOI 10.1186/2048-7010-3-11]
   Sultan B, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.01262
   Swanson J, 2002, J OPER RES SOC, V53, P472, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601336
   Theriault V, 2018, FOOD SECUR, V10, P1263, DOI 10.1007/s12571-018-0842-z
   Thornton PK, 2018, AGR SYST, V167, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.09.009
   Tongwane MI, 2018, AGR SYST, V166, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.08.011
   Totin E, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10061990
   Vercillo S, 2020, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V27, P565, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2020.1733702
   Verhagen J., 2015, DLO PLANT RES INT, P1
   Weber T, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P643, DOI 10.1002/2017EF000714
   Westermann O., 2015, CCAFS Research Program on Climate Change and. Food Security, V135, P1
   Wiredu A.N., 2013, INFLUENCE STAYMOIST
   Zougmore R, 2013, AGR FOOD SECUR, V2
NR 98
TC 14
Z9 15
U1 4
U2 56
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0308-521X
EI 1873-2267
J9 AGR SYST
JI Agric. Syst.
PD MAY
PY 2021
VL 190
AR 103131
DI 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103131
EA APR 2021
PG 15
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Agriculture
GA RW0SU
UT WOS:000646235500004
OA hybrid, Green Accepted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Martens, C
   Hickler, T
   Davis-Reddy, C
   Engelbrecht, F
   Higgins, S
   von Maltitz, GP
   Midgley, GF
   Pfeiffer, M
   Scheiter, S
AF Martens, Carola
   Hickler, Thomas
   Davis-Reddy, Claire
   Engelbrecht, Francois
   Higgins, Steven, I
   von Maltitz, Graham P.
   Midgley, Guy F.
   Pfeiffer, Mirjam
   Scheiter, Simon
TI Large uncertainties in future biome changes in Africa call for flexible
   climate adaptation strategies
SO GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE aDGVM; biome shifts and transitions; carbon stocks; climate change; CO2
   fertilization; ensemble simulations; uncertainties; water use efficiency
ID SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; ATMOSPHERIC CO2; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE;
   CARBON-DIOXIDE; ELEVATED CO2; VEGETATION SHIFTS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES;
   DECISION-MAKING; NITROGEN-CYCLE; FOREST
AB Anthropogenic climate change is expected to impact ecosystem structure, biodiversity and ecosystem services in Africa profoundly. We used the adaptive Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (aDGVM), which was originally developed and tested for Africa, to quantify sources of uncertainties in simulated African potential natural vegetation towards the end of the 21st century. We forced the aDGVM with regionally downscaled high-resolution climate scenarios based on an ensemble of six general circulation models (GCMs) under two representative concentration pathways (RCPs 4.5 and 8.5). Our study assessed the direct effects of climate change and elevated CO2 on vegetation change and its plant-physiological drivers. Total increase in carbon in aboveground biomass in Africa until the end of the century was between 18% to 43% (RCP4.5) and 37% to 61% (RCP8.5) and was associated with woody encroachment into grasslands and increased woody cover in savannas. When direct effects of CO2 on plants were omitted, woody encroachment was muted and carbon in aboveground vegetation changed between -8 to 11% (RCP 4.5) and -22 to -6% (RCP8.5). Simulated biome changes lacked consistent large-scale geographical patterns of change across scenarios. In Ethiopia and the Sahara/Sahel transition zone, the biome changes forecast by the aDGVM were consistent across GCMs and RCPs. Direct effects from elevated CO2 were associated with substantial increases in water use efficiency, primarily driven by photosynthesis enhancement, which may relieve soil moisture limitations to plant productivity. At the ecosystem level, interactions between fire and woody plant demography further promoted woody encroachment. We conclude that substantial future biome changes due to climate and CO2 changes are likely across Africa. Because of the large uncertainties in future projections, adaptation strategies must be highly flexible. Focused research on CO2 effects, and improved model representations of these effects will be necessary to reduce these uncertainties.
C1 [Martens, Carola; Hickler, Thomas] Goethe Univ Frankfurt Main, Inst Phys Geog, Altenhoferallee 1, D-60438 Frankfurt, Germany.
   [Martens, Carola; Hickler, Thomas; Pfeiffer, Mirjam; Scheiter, Simon] Senckenberg Biodivers & Climate Res Ctr SBiK F, Frankfurt, Germany.
   [Davis-Reddy, Claire] South African Environm Observat Network SAEON, uLwazi Node, Cape Town, South Africa.
   [Engelbrecht, Francois] Univ Witwatersrand, Global Change Inst, Johannesburg, South Africa.
   [Higgins, Steven, I] Univ Bayreuth, Plant Ecol, Bayreuth, Germany.
   [von Maltitz, Graham P.] Council Sci & Ind Res CSIR, Pretoria, South Africa.
   [von Maltitz, Graham P.; Midgley, Guy F.] Stellenbosch Univ, Global Change Biol Grp, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
C3 Goethe University Frankfurt; Senckenberg Biodiversitat & Klima-
   Forschungszentrum (BiK-F); Leibniz Association; Senckenberg Gesellschaft
   fur Naturforschung (SGN); National Research Foundation - South Africa;
   South African Environmental Observation Network (SAEON); University of
   Witwatersrand; University of Bayreuth; Stellenbosch University
RP Martens, C (corresponding author), Goethe Univ Frankfurt Main, Inst Phys Geog, Altenhoferallee 1, D-60438 Frankfurt, Germany.
EM martens.carola@yahoo.de
RI Midgley, Guy/H-3585-2014; Scheiter, Simon/G-5048-2012; Hickler,
   Thomas/S-6287-2016
OI Midgley, Guy/0000-0001-8264-0869; Engelbrecht,
   Francois/0000-0002-9189-6556; Scheiter, Simon/0000-0002-5449-841X;
   Hickler, Thomas/0000-0002-4668-7552; von Maltitz, Graham
   Paul/0000-0002-9272-1272
FU Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [01LL1801B, 01LL1802B];
   Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SCHE
   1719/2-1]; National Research Foundation [11859]
FX Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung, Grant/Award Number:
   01LL1801B and 01LL1802B; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung; Deutsche
   Forschungsgemeinschaft, Grant/Award Number: SCHE 1719/2-1; National
   Research Foundation, Grant/Award Number: 11859
CR Ainsworth EA, 2007, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V30, P258, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01641.x
   [Anonymous], Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
   Archer Emma, 2018, Biodiversity Ecol, V6, P14, DOI 10.7809/b-e.00296
   Avitabile V, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P1406, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13139
   Baccini A., 2012, Nature Climate Change, V2, P182, DOI 10.1038/nclimate1354
   Ball J.T., 1987, Prog. Photosynth. Res., P221, DOI [10.1007/978-94-017-0519-6_48, 10.1007/978-94-017-0519, 10.1007/978-94-017-0519-648, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-0519-6_48]
   Berner LT, 2012, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V9, P3943, DOI 10.5194/bg-9-3943-2012
   Bombelli A, 2009, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V6, P2193, DOI 10.5194/bg-6-2193-2009
   Bond WJ, 2019, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V34, P963, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2019.08.003
   Bond WJ, 2016, SCIENCE, V351, P120, DOI 10.1126/science.aad5132
   Bond WJ, 2012, PHILOS T R SOC B, V367, P601, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2011.0182
   Bond WJ, 2001, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V16, P45, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02033-4
   Bond WJ, 2000, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V6, P865, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00365.x
   Brancalion PHS, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aav3223
   Chapin F.S., 2011, Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology
   COLLATZ GJ, 1992, AUST J PLANT PHYSIOL, V19, P519, DOI 10.1071/PP9920519
   COLLATZ GJ, 1991, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V54, P107, DOI 10.1016/0168-1923(91)90002-8
   Conradi T, 2020, NEW PHYTOL, V227, P1294, DOI 10.1111/nph.16580
   Cramer W, 2001, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V7, P357, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00383.x
   Davis-Reddy C., 2017, Climate Risk and Vulnerability: A Handbook for Southern Africa, V2nd, P30
   De Kauwe MG, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P1759, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12164
   Dietzen CA, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P2970, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14699
   Doherty RM, 2010, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V16, P617, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01997.x
   Dufresne JL, 2002, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V29, DOI 10.1029/2001GL013777
   Engelbrecht CJ, 2013, INT J CLIMATOL, V33, P173, DOI 10.1002/joc.3420
   Engelbrecht CJ, 2016, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V123, P247, DOI 10.1007/s00704-014-1354-1
   Engelbrecht FA, 2009, INT J CLIMATOL, V29, P1013, DOI 10.1002/joc.1742
   Engelbrecht F, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/085004
   FARQUHAR GD, 1980, PLANTA, V149, P78, DOI 10.1007/BF00386231
   Fisher RA, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P35, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13910
   Fleischer K, 2019, NAT GEOSCI, V12, P736, DOI 10.1038/s41561-019-0404-9
   Fletcher S, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-09677-x
   Gonzalez P, 2012, J ARID ENVIRON, V78, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.11.001
   Gonzalez P, 2010, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V19, P755, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00558.x
   Haverd V, 2018, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V11, P2995, DOI 10.5194/gmd-11-2995-2018
   Hickler T, 2015, CURR FOR REP, V1, P69, DOI 10.1007/s40725-015-0014-8
   Higgins SI, 2000, J ECOL, V88, P213, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00435.x
   Higgins SI, 2008, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V17, P595, DOI 10.1071/WF06037
   Higgins SI, 2015, BIOL LETTERS, V11, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0572
   Higgins SI, 2012, NATURE, V488, P209, DOI 10.1038/nature11238
   Hoegh-Guldberg O., 2018, Global warming of 1.5C
   Hoffmann WA, 2012, ECOL LETT, V15, P759, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01789.x
   Hubau W, 2020, NATURE, V579, P80, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2035-0
   Huntingford C, 2013, NAT GEOSCI, V6, P268, DOI [10.1038/NGEO1741, 10.1038/ngeo1741]
   ILO International Labour Organization, 2019, AGR TOT EMPL ILO MOD
   Jetz W, 2012, PLOS BIOL, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001292
   Jiang MK, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P5856, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15277
   Jiang MK, 2020, NATURE, V580, P227, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2128-9
   Kgope BS, 2010, AUSTRAL ECOL, V35, P451, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02046.x
   Körner C, 2015, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V25, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.05.003
   Körner C, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1360, DOI 10.1126/science.1113977
   Liu YY, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P470, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2581, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2581]
   Loidi J, 2012, J VEG SCI, V23, P596, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01387.x
   Long SP, 2004, ANNU REV PLANT BIOL, V55, P591, DOI 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141610
   Lucht W., 2007, Terrestrial ecosystems in a changing world, P175, DOI [10.1007/978-3-540-32730-115, 10.1007/978-3-540-32730-1_15]
   McGregor J.L., 2005, C CAM GEOMETRIC ASPE
   Medlyn BE, 2001, NEW PHYTOL, V149, P247, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00028.x
   Medlyn BE, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P528, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2621
   Midgley GF, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P823, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2753, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2753]
   Moncrieff GR, 2014, NEW PHYTOL, V201, P908, DOI 10.1111/nph.12551
   Morales P, 2007, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V13, P108, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01289.x
   Müller C, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P2505, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12586
   Naidoo R, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P9495, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0707823105
   New M, 2002, CLIMATE RES, V21, P1, DOI 10.3354/cr021001
   Nishina K, 2015, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V6, P435, DOI 10.5194/esd-6-435-2015
   Norby RJ, 2016, NEW PHYTOL, V209, P17, DOI 10.1111/nph.13593
   Norby RJ, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P19368, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1006463107
   Nowak RS, 2004, NEW PHYTOL, V162, P253, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01033.x
   O'Connor TG, 2014, AFR J RANGE FOR SCI, V31, P67, DOI 10.2989/10220119.2014.939996
   Olejnik S, 2003, PSYCHOL METHODS, V8, P434, DOI 10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.434
   Osborne CP, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V220, P10, DOI 10.1111/nph.15236
   Parr CL, 2014, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V29, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2014.02.004
   Peñuelas J, 2011, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V20, P597, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00608.x
   Pfeiffer M, 2019, ECOL MODEL, V395, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.12.013
   Popp A., 2017, Global Environmental Change, V42, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002
   R Core Team, 2015, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
   Rammig A, 2010, NEW PHYTOL, V187, P694, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03318.x
   Ratnam J, 2011, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V20, P653, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00634.x
   Reich PB, 2014, NAT GEOSCI, V7, P920, DOI [10.1038/NGEO2284, 10.1038/ngeo2284]
   Saatchi SS, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P9899, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1019576108
   Sato H, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V117, DOI 10.1029/2012JG002056
   Scheiter S, 2018, S AFR J BOT, V116, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.sajb.2018.02.394
   Scheiter S, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P5106, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15217
   Scheiter S, 2019, ECOL ECON, V157, P342, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.015
   Scheiter S, 2016, ECOL MODEL, V332, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.03.022
   Scheiter S, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V205, P1211, DOI 10.1111/nph.13130
   Scheiter S, 2012, NEW PHYTOL, V195, P653, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04202.x
   Scheiter S, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P2224, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01838.x
   Scholze M, 2006, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V103, P13116, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0601816103
   Shi M, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P1299, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13131
   Silva LCR, 2013, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V22, P83, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2012.00783.x
   Sitch S, 2008, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V14, P2015, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01626.x
   Staver AC, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P230, DOI 10.1126/science.1210465
   Stevens N, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P235, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13409
   Stocker TF, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P33
   Stokes C, 2005, AUST J BOT, V53, P677, DOI 10.1071/BT04140
   Taylor SH, 2011, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V34, P65, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02226.x
   Terrer C, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P684, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0545-2
   Terrer C, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V217, P507, DOI 10.1111/nph.14872
   Terrer C, 2016, SCIENCE, V353, P72, DOI 10.1126/science.aaf4610
   van der Sleen P, 2015, NAT GEOSCI, V8, P24, DOI [10.1038/ngeo2313, 10.1038/NGEO2313]
   Veldman JW, 2015, BIOSCIENCE, V65, P1011, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biv118
   Warren JM, 2011, ECOHYDROLOGY, V4, P196, DOI 10.1002/eco.173
   Warszawski L, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3228, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1312330110
   Weaver CP, 2013, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V4, P39, DOI 10.1002/wcc.202
   White JW, 2014, OIKOS, V123, P385, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.01073.x
   Yousefpour R, 2012, ANN FOREST SCI, V69, P1, DOI 10.1007/s13595-011-0153-4
   Zaehle S, 2014, NEW PHYTOL, V202, P803, DOI 10.1111/nph.12697
NR 108
TC 37
Z9 37
U1 0
U2 59
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1354-1013
EI 1365-2486
J9 GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL
JI Glob. Change Biol.
PD JAN
PY 2021
VL 27
IS 2
BP 340
EP 358
DI 10.1111/gcb.15390
EA NOV 2020
PG 19
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA PE9FE
UT WOS:000585051000001
PM 33037718
OA hybrid, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Marando, F
   Salvatori, E
   Sebastiani, A
   Fusaro, L
   Manes, F
AF Marando, Federica
   Salvatori, Elisabetta
   Sebastiani, Alessandro
   Fusaro, Lina
   Manes, Fausto
TI Regulating Ecosystem Services and Green Infrastructure: assessment of
   Urban Heat Island effect mitigation in the municipality of Rome, Italy
SO ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
LA English
DT Article
DE Land Surface Temperature; Urban Heat Island; Urban and peri-urban
   forests; Street trees; Climate regulation; Nature-Based solution
ID LAND-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; DIFFERENCE VEGETATION INDEX; MEDITERRANEAN
   CITY; AIR-TEMPERATURE; METROPOLITAN-AREA; ENERGY IMPACT; TEL-AVIV;
   CLIMATE; SPACES; SUMMER
AB The Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect is one of the main environmental impacts of urbanization, affecting directly human health and well-being of the city dwellers, and also contributing to worsen environmental quality. As a key strategy to address sustainable urban development, the EU has advocated the development of Nature-Based solutions, such as the implementation of Green Infrastructure (GI), which can deliver a wide range of Regulating Ecosystem Services (ES). In this article, the ES of climate regulation provided by GI has been analyzed in the Municipality of Rome, Italy, characterized by a complex territory and by a Mediterranean climate. The methodological approach allowed to characterize the UHI and to analyze its features in a spatially explicit way and on a seasonal basis, through the Land Surface Temperature (LST) derived from Landsat-8 data. The cooling capacity of different GI elements (peri-urban forest, urban forest, street trees), as well as the effect of vegetation cover and tree diversity on the provision of this regulating ES were assessed. The results show that GI significantly mitigates the hot urban climate during summer, with an effect that is dependent on the GI element and the environmental constrains to which it is exposed. NDVI and tree cover resulted the main indicators of the provision of the ES of climate regulation, highlighting that GI elements such as urban and peri-urban forests have the highest potential to provide this ES in a Mediterranean city. In the context of the Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) process, our results lend support to claims that GI is important for an ecosystem-based climate adaptation strategy in urban environments, contributing to the definition of knowledge based criteria and indicators, relevant for decision-making in Mediterranean cities.
C1 [Marando, Federica; Salvatori, Elisabetta; Sebastiani, Alessandro; Fusaro, Lina; Manes, Fausto] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Environm Biol, Ple Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy.
C3 Sapienza University Rome
RP Salvatori, E (corresponding author), Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Environm Biol, Ple Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy.
EM elisabetta.salvatori@uniroma1.it
RI Salvatori, Elisabetta/F-8931-2010; SEBASTIANI, Alessandro/AAC-1725-2021;
   FUSARO, LINA/Q-4369-2017
OI SEBASTIANI, Alessandro/0000-0003-4877-3769; SALVATORI,
   ELISABETTA/0000-0002-5603-5064; MANES, Fausto/0000-0002-4563-4272;
   FUSARO, LINA/0000-0003-3316-707X; MARANDO, FEDERICA/0000-0002-8285-4012
FU Project: "Global Change and Health in the Vision "Planetary health" -
   Italian Ministry of Health [4100/22]; Project "Enhancing Resilience Of
   Urban Ecosystems through Green Infrastructure" (EnRoute) - Joint
   Research Centre of the European Commission [12/2016-11/2018]
FX This research was supported by the following grants: Project: "Global
   Change and Health in the Vision "Planetary health", co-ordinated by ISS,
   funded by Italian Ministry of Health (Capitolo 4100/22); Project
   "Enhancing Resilience Of Urban Ecosystems through Green Infrastructure"
   (EnRoute) funded by the Joint Research Centre of the European
   Commission, 12/2016-11/2018. We thank Ing. Massimo Magliocchetti from
   ARPA Lazio and the Direction of the Castelporziano Presidential Estate
   for climatic data provisioning. We are grateful to Prof. Giuseppe Raspa,
   Sapienza University of Rome, for his suggestions regarding statistical
   analyses. We also thank the two anonymous Referees for their
   constructive comments and suggestions that helped us to improve the
   quality of this work.
CR [Anonymous], 2001, INF BOT ITAL
   [Anonymous], 2015, Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature -based solutions & re-naturing cities, DOI DOI 10.2777/479582
   [Anonymous], 2017, SUSTAINABLE DEV
   [Anonymous], 2006, Urban Sprawl in Europe: The Ignored Challenge
   [Anonymous], 2004, HEAT WAVES RISKS RES
   Bolund P, 1999, ECOL ECON, V29, P293, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0
   Bowler DE, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V97, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
   Capotorti G, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V37, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.014
   Catalán B, 2008, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V85, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.11.004
   Cenedese A, 2003, J APPL METEOROL, V42, P1569, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<1569:IBAIUH>2.0.CO;2
   Chen XZ, 2012, INT J REMOTE SENS, V33, P5889, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2012.676743
   Cohen P, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V51, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.020
   Congedo L, 2015, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V13, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.12.002
   Conti S, 2005, ENVIRON RES, V98, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2004.10.009
   Copernicus, 2018, ITALY IMPROVING VALU
   Coronel AS, 2015, AIMS ENVIRON SCI, V2, P803, DOI 10.3934/environsci.2015.3.803
   Di Leo N, 2016, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V18, P373, DOI 10.1007/s10668-015-9653-y
   Diffenbaugh NS, 2007, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V34, DOI 10.1029/2007GL030000
   Esau I, 2016, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V16, P9563, DOI 10.5194/acp-16-9563-2016
   Escobedo F.J., 2018, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.UFUG.2018.02
   Escobedo FJ, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.002
   European Commission, 2013, COM2013249 EUR COMM
   European Commission. Directorate General for the Environment. University of the West of England (UWE). Science Communication Unit, 2016, LINKS NOISE AIR POLL, DOI [10.2779/200217, DOI 10.2779/200217]
   Fares S, 2009, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V6, P1043, DOI 10.5194/bg-6-1043-2009
   Feyisa GL, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V123, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.008
   Fini A, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V156, P443, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.032
   Fusaro L, 2017, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/rs9080791
   Fusaro L, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P1147, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.10.013
   Giannaros TM, 2012, ATMOS RES, V118, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.006
   Grimm NB, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P756, DOI 10.1126/science.1150195
   Haashemi S, 2016, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/rs8040352
   Haines-Young R., 2018, COMMON INT CLASSIFIC
   Hardin Perry J., 2007, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V6, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.01.005
   Heaviside C, 2016, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12940-016-0100-9
   Heinl M, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V134, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.003
   Hidalgo J, 2008, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1146, P354, DOI 10.1196/annals.1446.015
   Imhoff ML, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P504, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2009.10.008
   ISPRA, 2018, CONS SUOL IT 2018
   ISTAT, 2017, BIL DEM ANN 2017
   ISTAT, 2016, FOC VERD URB ANN 201
   Koceva M. M., URBAN EUROPE STAT CI
   Lafortezza R., 2017, ECOL INDIC, DOI [10.1016/j.ccolind.2017.05.014, DOI 10.1016/J.CCOLIND.2017.05.014]
   Lai LW, 2018, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V131, P227, DOI 10.1007/s00704-016-1975-7
   Lazzarini M, 2013, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V130, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2012.11.007
   Li FQ, 2004, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V92, P521, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2004.02.018
   Maes J, 2016, ECOSYST SERV, V17, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023
   Mallick J, 2012, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V19, P348, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2012.06.002
   Manes F, 1997, ATMOS ENVIRON, V31, P19, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00070-8
   Manes F, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V67, P425, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.009
   Manes F, 2012, ECOL APPL, V22, P349, DOI 10.1890/11-0561.1
   Marando F, 2016, FORESTS, V7, DOI 10.3390/f7070150
   Mariani L, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V569, P762, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.111
   Monteiro MV, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V16, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.008
   Morabito M, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10010026
   Mori AS, 2017, J APPL ECOL, V54, P12, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12669
   Munafò M, 2010, SCOT GEOGR J, V126, P153, DOI 10.1080/14702541.2010.527855
   Nastran M., 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, DOI [10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01, DOI 10.1016/J.UFUG.2018.01]
   Norton BA, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V134, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.018
   OKE TR, 1982, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V108, P1, DOI 10.1002/qj.49710845502
   Oliveira S, 2011, BUILD ENVIRON, V46, P2186, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.04.034
   Phelan PE, 2015, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V40, P285, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021155
   Pollastrini N., 2018, EGU GEN ASS C, V20, P9958
   Potchter O, 2006, INT J CLIMATOL, V26, P1695, DOI 10.1002/joc.1330
   Rahman MA, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V114, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.013
   Sakakibara Y, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P811, DOI 10.1002/joc.1180
   Salvati A, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V146, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.025
   Santamouris M, 2018, ENERG BUILDINGS, V166, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.007
   Schwarz N, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V18, P693, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.001
   Shashua-Bar L, 2010, INT J CLIMATOL, V30, P44, DOI 10.1002/joc.1869
   Sheng L, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V72, P738, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.009
   Sheng L, 2015, INT J REMOTE SENS, V36, P1584, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2015.1019016
   Skelhorn C, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V121, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.012
   Skoulika F, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V123, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.002
   Telesca L, 2006, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V101, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2005.12.007
   Tzoulas K, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
   Weier J., 2011, MEASURING VEGETATION
   Weng QH, 2004, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V89, P467, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.005
   World Health Organization, 2018, CLIM CHANG HLTH COUN
   Yu ZW, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V82, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.002
   Yuan F, 2007, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V106, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.003
   Zardo L, 2017, ECOSYST SERV, V26, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.016
   Zhang YJ, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V165, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.04.009
   Zoulia I, 2009, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V156, P275, DOI 10.1007/s10661-008-0483-3
NR 83
TC 144
Z9 156
U1 13
U2 207
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
PI AMSTERDAM
PA PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0304-3800
EI 1872-7026
J9 ECOL MODEL
JI Ecol. Model.
PD JAN 24
PY 2019
VL 392
BP 92
EP 102
DI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.11.011
PG 11
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA HO0NR
UT WOS:000460600900010
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Scott, D
   Iipinge, KN
   Mfune, JKE
   Muchadenyika, D
   Makuti, OV
   Ziervogel, G
AF Scott, Dianne
   Iipinge, Kornelia N.
   Mfune, John K. E.
   Muchadenyika, Davison
   Makuti, Olavi V.
   Ziervogel, Gina
TI The Story of Water in Windhoek: A Narrative Approach to Interpreting a
   Transdisciplinary Process
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE transdisciplinary; water; narrative; Windhoek; co-production;
   participatory
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; GOVERNANCE; POLICIES; JUSTICE
AB The aim of the paper is to present a story about the 2015 to early 2017Windhoek drought in the context of climate change while using the narrative approach. The story that is presented here is derived from the engagement of participants in a transdisciplinary, co-productive workshop, theWindhoek Learning Lab 1 (March 2017), as part of the FRACTAL Research Programme. The results show that the story starts with the 'complication' where the drought had reached crisis levels where the water demand increasingly exceeded the supply in the face of the drought. The City ofWindhoek (CoW) was unable to address the problem, particularly the recharging of the Windhoek aquifer due to lack of funding. Phase 2 then shows four reactions to the drought: water conservation by water demand management; a Water Saving campaign; the Windhoek Managed Aquifer Recharge Scheme; and, the setting up of the Cabinet Technical Committee of Supply Security. The resolution of the story, Phase 4, is when the national government instructs NamWater to provide the funds for CoW to complete the recharging of the aquifer, which supplied water to the city at the last minute at the end of 2016. The final situation of the story is that ongoing collaborative work by CoW with FRACTAL on the city's burning issues is planned to integrate climate change into future decision making for the longer term. The main actors in the story are the Ministry of Agriculture and NamWater as hero and villain, and CoW a hero, with the victims of the story, the residents of informal settlements. The main learnings from this story are that the lack of decentralization of power and resources serve to exacerbate water crises at the local level and hamper climate adaptation, despite a proactive and innovative local municipality. The paper also shows that the narrative approach provides the thread of the story to simplify a very complex set of arrangements and contradictions.
C1 [Scott, Dianne; Muchadenyika, Davison] Univ Cape Town, African Ctr Cities, ZA-7701 Cape Town, South Africa.
   [Iipinge, Kornelia N.; Mfune, John K. E.] Univ Windhoek, Dept Biol Sci, Windhoek 9000, Namibia.
   [Makuti, Olavi V.] City Windhoek Municipal, Dept Econ Dev & Community Serv, Windhoek 9000, Namibia.
   [Ziervogel, Gina] Univ Cape Town, Environm & Geog Sci, ZA-7701 Cape Town, South Africa.
   [Ziervogel, Gina] Univ Cape Town, African Climate & Dev Initiat, ZA-7701 Cape Town, South Africa.
C3 University of Cape Town; University of Cape Town; University of Cape
   Town
RP Scott, D (corresponding author), Univ Cape Town, African Ctr Cities, ZA-7701 Cape Town, South Africa.
EM diannescott.dbn@gmail.com; kniipinge@unam.na; jmfune@unam.na;
   muchadenyikad@gmail.com; Olavi.Makuti@windhoekcc.org.na;
   gina@csag.uct.ac.za
RI Ziervogel, Gina/AAG-2945-2019
OI Ziervogel, Gina/0000-0003-4219-6809
FU Department of International Development (DFID); National Environmental
   Research Council (NERC), UK Government; NERC [NE/M020347/1] Funding
   Source: UKRI
FX This research was funded by Department of International Development
   (DFID), and the National Environmental Research Council (NERC), UK
   Government.
CR [Anonymous], 2016, NAMIBIAN EC     0226
   [Anonymous], DROUGHT RESPONSE PLA
   [Anonymous], 2016, NEW ERA
   [Anonymous], 2013, INTEGRAL REV
   Arrighi J., 2016, 7 RED CROSS CRESC CL
   Climate Systems Analysis Group (CSAG) University of Cape Town, 2018, WINDH BACKGR R UNPUB
   Cook C, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.011
   Dahlstrom MF, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P13614, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1320645111
   Department of Infrastructure Water and Technical Services, 2015, WAT MAN PLAN VERS 1
   Department of Infrastructure Water and Technical Services, 2017, WAT MAN PLAN VERS 2
   Dryzek JS, 2015, ENVIRON POLIT, V24, P1, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2014.961273
   Epstein D, 2014, EVID POLICY, V10, P243, DOI 10.1332/174426514X13990325021128
   Era New, 2017, NEW ERA
   Flottum K, 2017, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V8, DOI 10.1002/wcc.429
   Flottum K, 2013, S AFR J HUM RIGHTS, V29, P61, DOI 10.1080/19962126.2013.11865066
   Flottum K, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V118, P417, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0654-7
   Flottum K, 2012, LANG COMMUN, V32, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.langcom.2011.11.002
   Flottum Kjersti., 2010, La Revue du GERAS, Asp, V58, P19, DOI [https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.1793, DOI 10.4000/ASP.1793]
   Hellmuth MollyE., 2000, POPULATION DEV ENV N, P47
   Houet T, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V86, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.010
   Hulme M, 2008, T I BRIT GEOGR, V33, P5, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00289.x
   Kompridis N, 2011, ETHICS GLOB POLIT, V4, P255, DOI 10.3402/egp.v4i4.14829
   Koujo F., 2017, WINDH LEARN LAB 1 HE
   Lahnsteiner J, 2007, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V55, P441, DOI 10.2166/wst.2007.022
   Lotz-Sisitka H, 2015, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V16, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.07.018
   Makara S, 2018, African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, V12, P22
   Mfune J., 2017, WINDH LEARN LAB 1 HE
   Minister ofWater Agriculture and Forestry, 2017, P PLEN WATERNET ANN
   Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Water (MAFW) Namibia, 2015, 1 MAFW 1, P1
   Mirosa O, 2012, ANTIPODE, V44, P932, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00929.x
   Mottier V., 2005, FORUM QUAL SOC RES, P6
   Murray R., 2013, 9 IWA WAT REUS C WIN
   Murray R, 2018, SUST WAT RESOUR MAN, V4, P217, DOI 10.1007/s40899-018-0213-0
   Namibia Press Agency (NAMPA), 2016, WAT MARSH MON GOVT I
   Nerlich B, 2010, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V1, P97, DOI 10.1002/wcc.002
   Ngatjiheue C., 2017, NAMIBIAN
   Pendleton W., 2014, URBAN FORUM, V25, P191, DOI DOI 10.1007/S12132-014-9220-X
   Peters I., 2013, 9 IWA WAT REUS C WIN
   Polk M, 2015, FUTURES, V65, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.001
   Sakakibara C, 2008, GEOGR REV, V98, P456, DOI 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2008.tb00312.x
   Schnegg M, 2016, HUM ECOL, V44, P245, DOI 10.1007/s10745-016-9820-2
   Scott D., 2018, WORKING PAPER
   Scott D., 2018, TELLING STORIES MULT
   Sharp L, 2011, T I BRIT GEOGR, V36, P501, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00435.x
   Shaw C, 2015, ECOL ECON, V109, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.001
   Shivute V., 2017, COMMUNICATION
   Singh C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P389, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1318744
   Steynor A, 2016, CLIM RISK MANAG, V13, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2016.03.001
   Tait L, 2017, J ENERGY SOUTH AFR, V28, P43, DOI 10.17159/2413-3051/2017/v28i3a1959
   Taylor A., 2016, TRANSDISCIPLINARITY
   The Institute for Public Policy Research, 2017, 18 I PUBL POL RES
   The Institute for Public Policy Research, 2016, 5 I PUBL POL RES
   Tierney K, 2006, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V604, P57, DOI 10.1177/0002716205285589
   Weidlich B., 2008, NAMIBIAN
   Windhoek Learning Lab Report (WCLLR), 2017, COMP KORN IIP UNPUB
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 56
TC 22
Z9 22
U1 1
U2 15
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD OCT
PY 2018
VL 10
IS 10
AR 1366
DI 10.3390/w10101366
PG 16
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA HB6UP
UT WOS:000451208400081
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Shinderman, M
AF Shinderman, Matt
TI American pika in a low-elevation lava landscape: expanding the known
   distribution of a temperature-sensitive species
SO ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
LA English
DT Article
DE American pika; climate adaptations; Newberry National Volcanic Monument;
   occupancy; Ochotona princeps; thermal maxima
ID PROVIDE THERMAL REFUGIA; OCHOTONA-PRINCEPS; PATTERNS; BEHAVIOR;
   THERMOREGULATION; POPULATIONS; HERBIVORE; TORTOISES; BURROWS; NEVADA
AB In 2010, the American pika (Ochotona princeps fenisex) was denied federal protection based on limited evidence of persistence in low-elevation environments. Studies in nonalpine areas have been limited to relatively few environments, and it is unclear whether patterns observed elsewhere (e.g., Bodie, CA) represent other nonalpine habitats. This study was designed to establish pika presence in a new location, determine distribution within the surveyed area, and evaluate influences of elevation, vegetation, lava complexity, and distance to habitat edge on pika site occupancy. In 2011 and 2012, we conducted surveys for American pika on four distinct subalpine lava flows of Newberry National Volcanic Monument, Oregon, USA. Field surveys were conducted at predetermined locations within lava flows via silent observation and active searching for pika sign. Site habitat characteristics were included as predictors of occupancy in multinomial regression models. Above and belowground temperatures were recorded at a subsample of pika detection sites. Pika were detected in 26% (2011) and 19% (2012) of survey plots. Seventy-four pika were detected outside survey plot boundaries. Lava complexity was the strongest predictor of pika occurrence, where pika were up to seven times more likely to occur in the most complicated lava formations. Pika were two times more likely to occur with increasing elevation, although they were found at all elevations in the study area. This study expands the known distribution of the species and provides additional evidence for persistence in nonalpine habitats. Results partially support the predictive occupancy model developed for pika at Craters of the Moon National Monument, another lava environment. Characteristics of the lava environment clearly influence pika site occupancy, but habitat variables reported as important in other studies were inconclusive here. Further work is needed to gain a better understanding of the species' current distribution and ability to persist under future climate conditions.
C1 [Shinderman, Matt] Oregon State Univ, Dept Forest Ecosyst & Soc, Bend, OR USA.
C3 Oregon State University; Oregon State University Cascades
RP Shinderman, M (corresponding author), Oregon State Univ Cascades, 2600 NW Coll Way, Bend, OR 97701 USA.
EM matt.shinderman@osucascades.edu
OI Shinderman, Matt/0000-0003-1522-1976
FU OSU-Cascades Circle of Excellence; Oregon State University Libraries &
   Press Open Access Fund
FX This study was funded by generous support from the OSU-Cascades Circle
   of Excellence. Publication of this article in an open access journal was
   funded by the Oregon State University Libraries & Press Open Access
   Fund.
CR Anderson W. E., 1998, ECOLOGICAL PROVINCES
   [Anonymous], 2002, Information and Likelihood Theory: A Basis for Model Selection and Inference
   Beever EA, 2003, J MAMMAL, V84, P37, DOI 10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084<0037:POAEAI>2.0.CO;2
   Beever EA, 2008, WEST N AM NATURALIST, V68, P8, DOI 10.3398/1527-0904(2008)68[8:APOPIN]2.0.CO;2
   Beever EA, 2013, ECOLOGY, V94, P1563, DOI 10.1890/12-2174.1
   Beever EA, 2010, ECOL APPL, V20, P164, DOI 10.1890/08-1011.1
   Collins GH, 2012, J FISH WILDL MANAG, V3, P311, DOI 10.3996/042012-JFWM-032
   CONNER DA, 1983, CAN J ZOOL, V61, P411, DOI 10.1139/z83-054
   Corp IBM, 2015, IBM SPSS STAT WINDOW
   DAUBENMIRE R., 1959, NORTHWEST SCI, V33, P43
   Dearing MD, 1997, ECOLOGY, V78, P774, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0774:TMOPTB]2.0.CO;2
   DonnellyNolan J. M., 2011, Newberry VolcanoCentral Oregons sleeping giant. USGS Fact Sheet 20113145
   Erb LP, 2014, ECOL APPL, V24, P429, DOI 10.1890/13-1072.1
   Erb LP, 2011, ECOLOGY, V92, P1730, DOI 10.1890/11-0175.1
   Galbreath KE, 2010, J BIOGEOGR, V37, P344, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02201.x
   HUNTLY NJ, 1986, J MAMMAL, V67, P139, DOI 10.2307/1381010
   Ivins B. L., 1984, THESIS U CALIFORNIA
   Jeffress MR, 2013, ECOL APPL, V23, P864, DOI 10.1890/12-0979.1
   KAWAMICHI T, 1982, Japanese Journal of Ecology, V32, P21
   Kearney M, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P3835, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0808913106
   Körner C, 2007, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V22, P569, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.006
   Krajick K, 2004, SCIENCE, V303, P1600, DOI 10.1126/science.303.5664.1600
   Lagarde F, 2012, ENVIRON CONSERV, V39, P172, DOI 10.1017/S0376892911000634
   MACARTHUR RA, 1973, CAN J ZOOL, V51, P11, DOI 10.1139/z73-002
   Manning T, 2011, WEST N AM NATURALIST, V71, P106, DOI 10.3398/064.071.0114
   Millar CI, 2013, WEST N AM NATURALIST, V73, P457, DOI 10.3398/064.073.0412
   Millar CI, 2010, ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES, V42, P76, DOI 10.1657/1938-4246-42.1.76
   Morgan D. S., 1997, 974088 US GEOL SURV
   NAGELKERKE NJD, 1991, BIOMETRIKA, V78, P691, DOI 10.1093/biomet/78.3.691
   Nichols LB, 2010, WEST N AM NATURALIST, V70, P500
   Pike DA, 2013, ANIM CONSERV, V16, P694, DOI 10.1111/acv.12049
   Ray C., 2007, DISTRIBUTION ABUNDAN
   Roach WJ, 2001, OIKOS, V92, P315, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.920214.x
   Rodhouse TJ, 2010, J MAMMAL, V91, P1287, DOI 10.1644/09-MAMM-A-334.1
   Simpson WG, 2009, WEST N AM NATURALIST, V69, P243, DOI 10.3398/064.069.0213
   SMITH A T, 1990, Mammalian Species, P1, DOI 10.2307/3504319
   SMITH AT, 1986, ANIM BEHAV, V34, P392, DOI 10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80107-5
   SMITH AT, 1974, ECOLOGY, V55, P1368, DOI 10.2307/1935464
   Smith JA, 2013, ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES, V45, P396, DOI 10.1657/1938-4246-45.3.396
   Theobald DM, 2007, ENVIRON MANAGE, V40, P134, DOI 10.1007/s00267-005-0199-x
   Varner J, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0104648
   Varner J, 2014, J MAMMAL, V95, P72, DOI 10.1644/13-MAMM-A-099.1
   Walde AD, 2009, SOUTHWEST NAT, V54, P375, DOI 10.1894/MH-41.1
   Wilkening JL, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0119327
   Wilkening JL, 2011, QUATERN INT, V235, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.05.004
   Williams JB, 1999, CONDOR, V101, P714, DOI 10.2307/1370208
   Wolf BO, 1996, CONDOR, V98, P424, DOI 10.2307/1369162
NR 47
TC 14
Z9 19
U1 1
U2 54
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 2045-7758
J9 ECOL EVOL
JI Ecol. Evol.
PD SEP
PY 2015
VL 5
IS 17
BP 3666
EP 3676
DI 10.1002/ece3.1626
PG 11
WC Ecology; Evolutionary Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Evolutionary Biology
GA CR0LM
UT WOS:000361010200012
PM 26380695
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU de Zwaan, DR
   Huang, A
   Fox, CH
   Bradley, DW
   Ethier, DM
AF de Zwaan, Devin R.
   Huang, Andrew
   Fox, Caroline H.
   Bradley, David W.
   Ethier, Danielle M.
TI Occupancy trends of overwintering coastal waterbird communities reveal
   guild-specific patterns of redistribution and shifting reliance on
   existing protected areas
SO GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE area-based conservation; before-after control-intervention; citizen
   science; climate change; cold-water refugia; community ecology; dynamic
   occupancy model; range shift
ID CALIFORNIA CURRENT SYSTEM; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BIRD ABUNDANCE;
   SITE-OCCUPANCY; RANGE SHIFTS; MARINE; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION;
   IMPACTS; OCEAN
AB Climate change and anthropogenic stressors are redistributing species and altering community composition globally. Protected areas (PAs) may not sufficiently protect populations of species undergoing distributional shifts, necessitating that we evaluate existing PAs and identify areas for future protection to conserve biodiversity across regional and temporal scales. Coastal waterbirds are important indicators of marine ecosystem health, representing mobile, long-lived, higher trophic-level consumers. Using a 20-year citizen science dataset (1999-2019) with a before-after control-intervention sampling framework for habitat protection, we applied dynamic occupancy models to assess winter occupancy trends along the Pacific coast of Canada. Specifically, we sought to understand potential drivers of regional declines, spatial commonalities among guilds, and changes in habitat use before and after PA designation, as well as between PAs and non-PAs. Occupancy trends varied regionally, with greater declines in the south compared to the north. Regional differences underlined potential range shifts, particularly for species with traits linked to temperature tolerance, movement, and high productivity foraging, as cold-tolerant, migratory benthivores and piscivores wintered farther north relative to 20 years ago or retreated to cold-water fjords. While 21 of 57 (36.8%) species responded positively to PA designation (before-after), greater occupancy declines tended to occur in PAs established pre-1999 relative to non-PAs (control-intervention). Since PAs are currently concentrated in the south, negative associations were most apparent for species retreating northward, but existing PAs may have a stabilizing or transitory effect on southern wintering species shifting into the region from farther south. We emphasize that conservation strategies must balance persistence of current communities with preserving the climate-adapted biodiversity of tomorrow by accounting for community-level effects of species moving into and out of existing PAs. Incorporating range shifts into PA planning by predicting distributional changes will allow conservation practitioners to identify priority habitats, such as cold-water refugia, for persistent wildlife communities.
   Le changement climatique et les facteurs de stress anthropiques redistribuent les especes et modifient la composition des communautes a l'echelle mondiale. Les zones protegees (ZP) ne protegent peut-etre pas suffisamment les populations d'especes qui subissent des changements de repartition, ce qui nous oblige a evaluer les ZP existantes et a identifier les zones a proteger a l'avenir pour conserver la biodiversite a l'echelle regionale et temporelle. Les oiseaux cotiers sont des indicateurs importants de la sante des ecosystemes marins, car ils representent des consommateurs mobiles, ont une longue duree de vie et represente le niveau trophique superieur. En utilisant un ensemble de donnees de science participative sur 20 ans (1999-2019) avec un echantillonnage avant-apres controle-intervention (AACI) pour la protection de l'habitat, nous avons applique des modeles d'occupation dynamiques pour evaluer les tendances de l'occupation hivernale le long de la cote pacifique du Canada. Plus precisement, nous avons cherche a comprendre les moteurs potentiels des declins regionaux, les points communs spatiaux entre les guildes et les changements dans l'utilisation de l'habitat avant et apres la designation de le ZP, ainsi qu'entre les ZP et les non-ZP. Les tendances en matiere d'occupation varient d'une region a l'autre, avec des declins plus importants dans le sud que dans le nord. Les differences regionales soulignent les deplacements potentiels de l'aire de repartition, en particulier pour les especes dont les caracteristiques sont liees a la tolerance a la temperature, aux deplacements et a la recherche de nourriture a rendement eleve, car les benthivores et les piscivores migrateurs tolerants au froid ont hiverne plus au nord qu'il y a 20 ans ou se sont retires dans les fjords aux eaux froides. Alors que 21 des 57 (36,8 %) especes ont reagi positivement a la designation des aires protegees (avant-apres), les baisses d'occupation ont eu tendance a etre plus importantes dans les aires protegees creees avant 1999 que dans les aires non protegees (controle-intervention). Comme les aires protegees sont actuellement concentrees dans le sud, les associations negatives etaient plus evidentes pour les especes qui se retirent vers le nord, mais les aires protegees existantes peuvent avoir un effet stabilisateur ou transitoire sur les especes hivernant dans le sud qui se deplacent dans la region a partir d'une region plus au sud. Nous soulignons que les strategies de conservation doivent trouver un equilibre entre la persistance des communautes actuelles et la preservation de la biodiversite adaptee au climat de demain, en tenant compte des effets au niveau des communautes des especes qui entrent dans les aires protegees existantes ou qui en sortent. L'integration des changements d'aire de repartition dans la planification des aires protegees en predisant les changements de distribution permettra aux praticiens de la conservation d'identifier les habitats prioritaires, tels que les refuges d'eau froide, pour les communautes d'especes sauvages persistantes.
   We evaluated 20-year occupancy trends of coastal waterbirds wintering inside and outside protected areas (PAs) along Canada's Pacific coast. Occupancy declines were the greatest in older PAs concentrated at lower latitudes, with cold-tolerant, migratory benthivores and piscivores shifting farther north or to cold-water fjords. However, established PAs may have a stabilizing or transitional effect on communities as species shift into the region from farther south. Effective conservation must balance persistence of current communities with preserving future climate-adapted communities by managing for species moving into and out of existing PAs, as well as targeting future priority areas, such as cold-water refugia.image
C1 [de Zwaan, Devin R.] Mt Allison Univ, Dept Biol, Sackville, NB, Canada.
   [de Zwaan, Devin R.] Acadia Univ, Dept Biol, Wolfville, NS, Canada.
   [Huang, Andrew] Canadian Wildlife Serv, Environm & Climate Change Canada, Delta, BC, Canada.
   [Fox, Caroline H.] Environm & Climate Change Canada, Canadian Wildlife Serv, Nanaimo, BC V9R 5H7, Canada.
   [Bradley, David W.; Ethier, Danielle M.] Birds Canada, Port Rowan, ON, Canada.
C3 Mount Allison University; Acadia University; Environment & Climate
   Change Canada; Canadian Wildlife Service; Environment & Climate Change
   Canada; Canadian Wildlife Service
RP de Zwaan, DR (corresponding author), Mt Allison Univ, Dept Biol, Sackville, NB, Canada.
EM ddezwaan@mta.ca
RI ; de Zwaan, Devin R./L-4628-2016
OI Ethier, Danielle/0000-0003-2191-9633; de Zwaan, Devin
   R./0000-0001-5418-0754
FU Public Conservation Assistance Fund of the Habitat Conservation Trust
   Foundation; Environment and Climate Change Canada (Canadian Wildlife
   Service); Vancouver Foundation; BC Waterfowl Society; Public
   Conservation Assistance Fund of the Habitat Conservation Trust
   Foundation, TD Friends of the Environment Fund
FX The BCCWS was conceived by a group of scientists, local naturalists, and
   conservation planners, initiated by Birds Canada in 1999, and sustained
   by >400 citizen science volunteers, without which this work would not be
   possible. Funding was provided by Environment and Climate Change Canada
   (Canadian Wildlife Service), with additional support from the Vancouver
   Foundation, BC Waterfowl Society, Public Conservation Assistance Fund of
   the Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation, TD Friends of the Environment
   Fund, Port of Vancouver, and BC Field Ornithologists.Pacific Birds
   Habitat Joint Venture.
CR Antao LH, 2022, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V12, P587, DOI 10.1038/s41558-022-01381-x
   Araújo MB, 2011, ECOL LETT, V14, P484, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01610.x
   Arimitsu ML, 2016, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V560, P19, DOI 10.3354/meps11888
   Assis J, 2018, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V27, P277, DOI 10.1111/geb.12693
   Ban N, 2008, AQUAT CONSERV, V18, P55, DOI 10.1002/aqc.816
   Birds Canada, 2021, BC coastal waterbird survey protocol: Instructions for participants
   Birds Canada, 2021, British Columbia Coastal Waterbirds Survey. Data accessed from NatureCounts, a node of the Avian Knowledge Network
   Blowes SA, 2019, SCIENCE, V366, P339, DOI 10.1126/science.aaw1620
   Bonnet-Lebrun AS, 2022, AMBIO, V51, P345, DOI 10.1007/s13280-021-01650-7
   Bosch S., 2020, sdmpredictors: Species distribution modelling predictor datasets
   Bower John L., 2009, Marine Ornithology, V37, P9
   Buckley LB, 2012, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V43, P205, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160516
   Burnham K. P., 2002, Model selection and inference: a practical informationtheoretic approach, VSecond edition
   BUTLER R W, 1987, Canadian Wildlife Service Occasional Paper, P1
   Chen IC, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P1024, DOI 10.1126/science.1206432
   Christie AP, 2021, CONSERV BIOL, V35, P249, DOI 10.1111/cobi.13577
   D'Aloia CC, 2019, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V7, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2019.00027
   Davidson P. J. A., 2015, ATLAS BREEDING BIRDS
   de Zwaan D. R., 2024, Data for: Occupancy trends of overwintering coastal waterbird communities reveal guildspecific patterns of redistribution and shifting reliance on existing protected areas, DOI [10.6084/m9.figshare.23055821, DOI 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.23055821]
   de Zwaan D. R., 2024, Code for: Occupancy trends of overwintering coastal waterbird communities reveal guildspecific patterns of redistribution and shifting reliance on existing protected areas, DOI [10.6084/m9.figshare.23055497, DOI 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.23055497]
   Devictor V, 2008, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V275, P2743, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2008.0878
   Dudley N., 2008, Guidelines for applying protected area management categories, DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2008.PAPS.2.en
   Eckert I., 2023, NAT COMMUN, V14, P7113, DOI [10.1038/s41467-023-42737-x, DOI 10.1038/S41467-023-42737-X]
   Elsen PR, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aay0814
   Ethier D, 2020, AVIAN CONSERV ECOL, V15, DOI 10.5751/ACE-01711-150220
   Fiske IJ, 2011, J STAT SOFTW, V43, P1
   Gaget E, 2021, CONSERV BIOL, V35, P834, DOI 10.1111/cobi.13648
   Gaydos Joseph K., 2011, Northwestern Naturalist, V92, P79
   Government of Canada, 2022, Canadian protected and conserved areas database
   Gray CL, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms12306
   Green R. H., 1979, Sampling design and statistical methods for environmental biologists.
   Guélat J, 2018, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V9, P1614, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12983
   Hanski L., 1999, Metapopulation ecology
   Harley CDG, 2006, ECOL LETT, V9, P228, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00871.x
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   Howes D., 1994, PHYS SHORE ZONE MAPP
   Hylander K, 2022, CONSERV BIOL, V36, DOI 10.1111/cobi.13847
   Hyrenbach KD, 2003, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V50, P2537, DOI 10.1016/S0967-0645(03)00123-1
   Islam MS, 2004, MAR POLLUT BULL, V48, P624, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2003.12.004
   Johnston A, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P1055, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2035
   Kellner KF, 2022, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V13, P577, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.13777
   Kéry M, 2008, COMMUNITY ECOL, V9, P207, DOI 10.1556/ComEc.9.2008.2.10
   Khangaonkar T, 2019, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V124, P3876, DOI 10.1029/2018JC014670
   Lawler JJ, 2020, PHILOS T R SOC B, V375, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2019.0117
   Le Saout S, 2013, SCIENCE, V342, P803, DOI 10.1126/science.1239268
   LEBRETON JD, 1992, ECOL MONOGR, V62, P67, DOI 10.2307/2937171
   Lehikoinen A, 2021, J ANIM ECOL, V90, P1085, DOI 10.1111/1365-2656.13433
   Lehikoinen P, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P304, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14461
   Lenoir J, 2015, ECOGRAPHY, V38, P15, DOI 10.1111/ecog.00967
   Lenoir J, 2020, NAT ECOL EVOL, V4, P1044, DOI 10.1038/s41559-020-1198-2
   Mackenzie DI, 2009, ECOLOGY, V90, P823, DOI 10.1890/08-0141.1
   MacKenzie DI, 2004, J AGR BIOL ENVIR ST, V9, P300, DOI 10.1198/108571104X3361
   MacKenzie DI, 2003, ECOLOGY, V84, P2200, DOI 10.1890/02-3090
   MADSEN J, 1995, IBIS, V137, pS67, DOI 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1995.tb08459.x
   Mahoney PC, 2017, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V140, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.02.021
   Mason SC, 2015, BIOL J LINN SOC, V115, P586, DOI 10.1111/bij.12574
   Maxwell SL, 2020, NATURE, V586, P217, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2773-z
   Mazerolle M., 2019, AICCMODAVG MODEL SEL, DOI DOI 10.1515/pacres-2017-0001
   Moilanen A, 2002, OIKOS, V96, P516, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.960313.x
   Morelli TL, 2020, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V18, P228, DOI 10.1002/fee.2189
   MPA Network BC Northern Shelf Initiative, 2023, Network Action Plan - Compendium 3: Socio-economic overview of the Northern Shelf Bioregion
   Orrock JL, 2000, ECOL APPL, V10, P1356, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1356:PPAAOA]2.0.CO;2
   Pavón-Jordán D, 2020, BIOL CONSERV, V246, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108549
   Pecl GT, 2017, SCIENCE, V355, DOI 10.1126/science.aai9214
   Pelletier D, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0230262
   Pigot AL, 2020, NAT ECOL EVOL, V4, P230, DOI 10.1038/s41559-019-1070-4
   Robb CK, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0099578
   Rojas IM, 2022, CONSERV BIOL, V36, DOI 10.1111/cobi.13834
   Rushing CS, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P12897, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2000299117
   Rushing CS, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-48851-5
   Santangeli A, 2017, DIVERS DISTRIB, V23, P308, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12529
   Sbrocco E. J., 2013, Ecology, V94, DOI DOI 10.1890/12-1358.1
   Schleuning M, 2023, FUNCT ECOL, V37, P4, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.14246
   Schuster R, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V101, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.002
   Schuster R, 2013, ECOGRAPHY, V36, P499, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07681.x
   Scridel D, 2021, DIVERS DISTRIB, V27, P1759, DOI 10.1111/ddi.13366
   Sebert L., 1972, Dimensions and areas of maps of the National Topographic System of Canada
   Smith Adam C., 2014, Canadian Field-Naturalist, V128, P119
   Smith PA, 2020, AMBIO, V49, P732, DOI 10.1007/s13280-019-01308-5
   Stewart-Oaten A, 2001, ECOL MONOGR, V71, P305, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0305:TASVIE]2.0.CO;2
   Stocks A, 2017, STATE COASTAL COMMUN
   Sydeman WJ, 2001, PROG OCEANOGR, V49, P309, DOI 10.1016/S0079-6611(01)00028-3
   Team RC, 2021, R LANGUAGE ENV STAT
   Thomas CD, 2015, BIOL J LINN SOC, V115, P718, DOI 10.1111/bij.12510
   Tozer DC, 2016, J GREAT LAKES RES, V42, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.jglr.2015.10.015
   Tyberghein L, 2012, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V21, P272, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00656.x
   Veit RR, 1996, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V139, P11, DOI 10.3354/meps139011
   Vilchis LI, 2015, CONSERV BIOL, V29, P154, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12378
   Wang J, 2001, FISH OCEANOGR, V10, P132, DOI 10.1046/j.1054-6006.2001.00035.x
   Wauchope HS, 2022, NATURE, V605, P103, DOI 10.1038/s41586-022-04617-0
   Weir L, 2009, HERPETOL CONSERV BIO, V4, P389
NR 91
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 6
U2 26
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1354-1013
EI 1365-2486
J9 GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL
JI Glob. Change Biol.
PD FEB
PY 2024
VL 30
IS 2
AR e17178
DI 10.1111/gcb.17178
PG 16
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA HE8J9
UT WOS:001157906100001
PM 38332577
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Filippova, V
   Vinokurova, L
AF Filippova, Viktoriia
   Vinokurova, Liliia
GP SGEM
TI RUSSIAN OLD-TIMERS IN THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF YAKUTIA
SO SGEM 2016, BK 3: ANTHROPOLOGY, ARCHAEOLOGY, HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY
   CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOL II
SE International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social
   Sciences and Arts
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social
   Sciences and Arts, SGEM 2016
CY AUG 24-30, 2016
CL Albena, BULGARIA
SP Bulgarian Acad Sci, Acad Sci Czech Republ, Latvian Acad Sci, Polish Acad Sci, Russian Acad Sci, Serbian Acad Sci & Arts, Slovak Acad Sci, Natl Acad Sci Ukraine, Natl Acad Sci Armenia, Sci Council Japan, World Acad Sci, European Acad Sci, Arts & Letters, Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia, Croatian Acad Sci & Arts, Acad Sci Moldova, Montenegrin Acad Sci & Arts, Georgian Acad Sci, Acad Fine Arts & Design Bratislava, Russian Acad Arts, Turkish Acad Sci, Bulgarian Cultural Inst Vienna
DE Arctic; Yakutia; Russian Arctic Old-timers; ethnic adaptation; social
   and cultural integration; historical cultural landscape
AB The authors presented preliminary results of the project II.2II/XII.186-2 Historical memory in a polycultural space of Yakutia: the formation and transformation of the Arctic identity, supported by the Program of fundamental scientific research of the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences and part of results of the project No 15-11-14003 with the financial support of Russian Humanitarian Science Foundation and the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). This paper focused on local cultural landscapes of Russian old-timers groups as the result of their adaptation to environment and multiethnic socio-cultural space of Yakutia.
   Research work on the project was carried with a broad range of documentary sources from central and local archives and libraries. Field materials were collected in settlements of Russian old-timers and neighboring non-Russian communities of the Northern and Central Yakutia.
   An originality of development of the Russian people in the conditions of Far North is their successful experience of interethnic economic and cultural contacts. Several local ethno-territorial groups were formed as a result of four centuries of Russian old-timer's adaptation to climatic conditions and multiethnic space in Yakutia: arctic fishing and hunting group, agricultural group of central Yakutia, descendants of coachmen and Yakut Cossacks. These local ethno-territorial groups have mastered their niche in the surrounding landscape. But primarily in new space the Russians had kept their traditional economic activities, as arable grain husbandry. Pockets of "Russian agriculture" in Yakutia appeared with the arrival of the first settlers in basins of Amga and the Middle Lena. Growing of cereals and vegetables, unfamiliar activity for the local population, has changed the cultural landscape of Yakutia. The example of fruitful mutual borrowed economic activity is the experience of arctic group of Russian old-timers. Faced with natural and climatic specifics of Arctic Yakutia, Russians have used components of traditional skills of the indigenous population. Arctic fishing, hunting and dog sledding became the basis of well-being for Russian old-timers in the harsh arctic conditions. Here we focused on two cases of adaptation when the Russians were the source of economic and cultural innovations.
C1 [Filippova, Viktoriia; Vinokurova, Liliia] Russian Acad Sci, Siberian Branch, Inst Humanities Res & Indigenous Studies North, Yakutsk, Russia.
C3 Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute for Humanities Research &
   Indigenous Studies of the North; Yakut Science Centre of Complex Medical
   Problems
RP Filippova, V (corresponding author), Russian Acad Sci, Siberian Branch, Inst Humanities Res & Indigenous Studies North, Yakutsk, Russia.
RI Vinokurova, Liliia/M-7026-2016; Filippova, Viktoriya/M-6988-2016
OI Filippova, Viktoriya/0000-0002-3900-918X
CR Basharin G.P., 2003, HIST AGRARIAN RELATI, VI-II, P188
   Chikachev A.G., 2007, RUSSIANS ARCTIC POLA
   Gnatyuk G A, 1996, GEOGRAPHY POPULATION
   Ivanov V.N., 2002, YAKUTIA RUSSIAN STAT
   Mainov I.I., 2012, POPULATION YAKUTIA, p323 
   Safronov F.G., 2010, HIST NE ASIA 17 BEGI
NR 6
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 2
PU STEF92 TECHNOLOGY LTD
PI SOFIA
PA 1 ANDREY LYAPCHEV BLVD, SOFIA, 1797, BULGARIA
SN 2367-5659
BN 978-619-7105-77-3
J9 INT MULTIDDISCIP SCI
PY 2016
BP 131
EP 135
PG 5
WC History & Philosophy Of Science; Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Science &amp; Humanities (CPCI-SSH)
SC History & Philosophy of Science; Social Sciences - Other Topics
GA BH0OH
UT WOS:000395727400017
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Jiang, TC
   Wang, B
   Duan, XN
   Liu, DL
   He, JQ
   He, L
   Jin, N
   Feng, H
   Yu, Q
AF Jiang, Tengcong
   Wang, Bin
   Duan, Xiaoning
   Liu, De Li
   He, Jianqiang
   He, Liang
   Jin, Ning
   Feng, Hao
   Yu, Qiang
TI Prioritizing agronomic practices and uncertainty assessment under
   climate change for winter wheat in the loess plateau, China
SO AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Winter wheat; Crop model; GCMs; Adaptation options; Yield change
   uncertainty; The loess plateau
ID YIELD; TEMPERATURE; PERFORMANCE; IRRIGATION; MANAGEMENT; IMPACTS
AB CONTEXT: Enhancing the climate resilience of local food systems with adaptation options related to cultivar, irrigation, sowing, and fertilization presents significant opportunities for ensuring food security under climate change. The climate-crop modeling method is one of the main ways to customize climate adaptation strategies. However, there is a current lack of prioritization and uncertainty assessment regarding the potential of various adaptations feasible to local farmers. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the prioritizing agronomic practices (shifting the thermal time of cultivars, irrigation, topdressing schedules, and sowing date) and uncertainty assessment under climate change for winter wheat in the Loess Plateau, China. METHODS: Hence, this study integrated eight crop models (CMs), six global climate models (GCMs), and four different types of adaptation options under two Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) 245 and SSP585 emission scenarios. We assessed the potential for adaptation during the periods of 2031-2060 and 2071-2100 at three representative sites (Changwu, Linfen, and Yangling) in the Loess Plateau, China. The ANOVA analysis was used to quantify the uncertainties in wheat yield projections caused by adaptation measures (ADP), CM, GCM, and climate change scenarios (Scen). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We found that optimizing irrigation and topdressing timing positively impacted winter wheat yields more than adjusting planting dates or prolonging the reproductive stage across all three sites. By implementing irrigation during the booting or flowering stage, the ensemble of climate-crop models projected yield increases ranging from 7.1% to 8.5% at Changwu, 18.2% to 20.2% at Linfen, and 13.5% to 17.3% at Yangling. Crop models dominated the projection uncertainty, with values over 50% at all three sites. However, adaptation strategies would dominate the uncertainty in yield projection when the number of crop models used was less than five. Furthermore, the uncertainty in yield projection due to individual crop models varied depending on the study sites and adaptation options. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings could provide valuable guidance to modelers in selecting appropriate climate-crop models to develop effective adaptation options for addressing climate change challenges. Additionally, our findings will provide guidance to producers in the Loess Plateau to optimize food production under climate change.
C1 [Jiang, Tengcong; Feng, Hao; Yu, Qiang] Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, State Key Lab Soil Eros & Dryland Farming Loess Pl, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China.
   [Duan, Xiaoning] PowerChina Northwest Engn Corp Ltd, Xian 710065, Peoples R China.
   [Jiang, Tengcong; Feng, Hao] Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Water Saving Agr Arid Areas China, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Bin; Liu, De Li] Wagga Wagga Agr Inst, NSW Dept Primary Ind, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.
   [He, Jianqiang; Feng, Hao] Northwest A&F Univ, Key Lab Agr Soil & Water Engn Arid Area, Minist Educ, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China.
   [He, Liang] Natl Meteorol Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
   [Jin, Ning] Shanxi Inst Energy, Dept Resources & Environm Engn, Jinzhong 030600, Shanxi, Peoples R China.
C3 Northwest A&F University - China; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute
   of Soil & Water Conservation (ISWC), CAS; Northwest A&F University -
   China; Department of Primary Industries & Regional Development NSW;
   Northwest A&F University - China; Shanxi Institute of Energy
RP Yu, Q (corresponding author), Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, State Key Lab Soil Eros & Dryland Farming Loess Pl, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China.; Wang, B (corresponding author), Wagga Wagga Agr Inst, NSW Dept Primary Ind, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.
EM bin.a.wang@dpi.nsw.gov.au; yuq@nwafu.edu.cn
RI Yu, Qiang/D-3702-2009; , De Li Liu/Y-4656-2019; Wang, Bin/AFI-6568-2022
OI Yang, Qian/0009-0003-0914-3198; Wang, Bin/0000-0002-6422-5802; Liu, De
   Li/0000-0003-2574-1908
FU Office of Science, US Department of Energy
FX This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation China (No.
   41961124006), and Sanqin Scholars Innovation team. acknowledge the
   modeling groups, the Program for Climate Diagnosis and Intercomparison
   (PCMDI), and the WCRP's Working Group on Coupled Modeling (WGCM) for
   their roles in making available the WCRP CMIP6 multi-model dataset.
   Support of this dataset is provided by the Office of Science, US
   Department of Energy. Bernie Dominiak reviewed an early version of the
   manuscript.r the WCRP CMIP6 multi-model dataset. Support of this dataset
   is pro-vided by the Office of Science, US Department of Energy. Bernie
   Dom-iniak reviewed an early version of the manuscript.
CR Asseng S, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P827, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1916, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1916]
   Asseng S, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P997, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02262.x
   Brisson N, 2003, EUR J AGRON, V18, P309, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00110-7
   Brisson N., 2006, WORKING DYNAMIC CROP, P257
   Challinor AJ, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P287, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2153, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2153]
   Corbeels M, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V256, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.02.026
   Ding DianYuan Ding DianYuan, 2015, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, V31, P111
   Dusenge ME, 2019, NEW PHYTOL, V221, P32, DOI 10.1111/nph.15283
   Feng PY, 2022, NAT FOOD, V3, P862, DOI 10.1038/s43016-022-00613-9
   Folberth C, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms11872
   Hasegawa T, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P699, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0230-x
   He L, 2015, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V200, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.09.011
   Howden SM, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P19691, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701890104
   Huang MB, 2004, IRRIGATION SCI, V23, P47, DOI 10.1007/s00271-004-0092-z
   Huang MX, 2022, AGR SYST, V199, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103411
   HUNT LA, 1995, CAN J PLANT SCI, V75, P619, DOI 10.4141/cjps95-107
   Jägermeyr J, 2021, NAT FOOD, V2, P875, DOI 10.1038/s43016-021-00400-y
   Jahan MAHS, 2018, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V258, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2018.02.008
   Jiang TC, 2022, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V319, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108933
   Jones JW, 2003, EUR J AGRON, V18, P235, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00107-7
   Kang SZ, 2002, AGR WATER MANAGE, V55, P203, DOI 10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00180-9
   Kassie BT, 2016, EUR J AGRON, V81, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2016.08.012
   Keating BA, 2003, EUR J AGRON, V18, P267, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00108-9
   Li HM, 2005, AGR WATER MANAGE, V76, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.01.006
   Li LC, 2021, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V308, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108558
   Liu C, 2020, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V292, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108136
   Liu K, 2023, NAT COMMUN, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-36129-4
   Lobell DB, 2012, PLANT PHYSIOL, V160, P1686, DOI 10.1104/pp.112.208298
   Lobell DB, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P616, DOI [10.1126/science.1206376, 10.1126/science.1204531]
   Luo QY, 2022, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V149, P805, DOI 10.1007/s00704-022-04086-5
   Memon SA, 2021, AGR WATER MANAGE, V243, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106389
   Minoli S, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-34411-5
   Minoli S, 2019, EARTHS FUTURE, V7, P1464, DOI 10.1029/2018EF001130
   Nouri M, 2017, AGR WATER MANAGE, V186, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.03.004
   Paleari L, 2022, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V28, P2689, DOI 10.1111/gcb.16087
   Paleari L, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P4651, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13682
   Rahimi-Moghaddam S, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V253, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.01.032
   Ritchie J, 1985, ARS-38
   Sacks WJ, 2010, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V19, P607, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00551.x
   Salo TJ, 2016, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V154, P1218, DOI 10.1017/S0021859615001124
   Shibu ME, 2010, EUR J AGRON, V32, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2010.01.003
   Srinivasan V, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P1626, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13526
   Tao FL, 2022, EUR J AGRON, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2022.126500
   Tao FL, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P1291, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14019
   Timsina J, 2008, AGR WATER MANAGE, V95, P1099, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.04.009
   Ugarte C, 2007, FIELD CROP RES, V100, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2006.07.010
   Wang B, 2020, NAT FOOD, V1, P720, DOI 10.1038/s43016-020-00181-w
   Wheeler T, 2013, SCIENCE, V341, P508, DOI 10.1126/science.1239402
   Wolf J., 2012, User Guide for LINTUL4 and LINTUL4V: Simple Generic Model for Simulation of Crop Growth under Potential, Water Limited and Nitrogen Limited Conditions
   Wolf J, 2013, LINTUL-4 Generic Simulation Model for Crop Growth under Potential, Water Limited and N-Limited Conditions and under Climatic Change
   Wolf J., 2012, User Guide for Lintul5: Simple Generic Model for Simulation of Crop Growth under 926 Potential, Water Limited and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Limited Conditions
   Xiong W, 2020, NAT FOOD, V1, DOI 10.1038/s43016-019-0004-2
   Zabel F, 2021, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V27, P3870, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15649
   Zhao J, 2022, EUR J AGRON, V138, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2022.126516
NR 54
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 9
U2 30
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0308-521X
EI 1873-2267
J9 AGR SYST
JI Agric. Syst.
PD DEC
PY 2023
VL 212
AR 103770
DI 10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103770
EA SEP 2023
PG 14
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA U4QY3
UT WOS:001084674100001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Bao, JL
   Gao, S
AF Bao, Junlin
   Gao, Shu
TI Wetland Utilization and Adaptation Practice of a Coastal Megacity: A
   Case Study of Chongming Island, Shanghai, China
SO FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE coastal wetland; land use change; climatic adaptation; sea-dike system;
   Chongming Island; Shanghai
ID SEA-LEVEL RISE; LONG-TERM; LAND-USE; PROGRADATION RATE; YANGTZE-RIVER;
   MEKONG DELTA; DEGRADATION; FUTURE; RECLAMATION; STRATEGIES
AB Coastal urban areas are faced with risks induced by global warming and sea level rise, which puts pressure on regional sustainable development. In particular, land use adjustment is closely related to climate change for a coastal megacity. Coastal wetlands on the edge of the megacity represent a vulnerable ecosystem and a key area in terms of the resilient adaptation strategy. However, the interrelationship between the development of these wetlands and the megacity's adaptation practice has not been sufficiently analyzed. From a historical perspective, based on document synthesis and field investigation, we attempt in this study to reveal long-term land use stages and driving factors in association with urban marginal wetlands, with a special reference to eastern Chongming Island, Shanghai. On such a basis, the future adaptation strategy of the megacity is evaluated. The analytical results show that this island has witnessed three periods of time for wetland utilization: traditional land use for salt production, fishery and agriculture before 1950, industrialization with rapid reclamation during 1950-2001, and the land use pattern orientated toward wetland ecosystem protection after 2002. The driving forces include sediment budget on the coast, wetland morphodynamic processes, sea level rise, population growth, and resource management policy changes. Transformation occurred between the wetland utilization stages in response to the changes of these forces. Furthermore, facing future climate change, there are different options of adaptation, e.g., retreatment and adherence. It may not be suitable for coastal cities with a large population to take the first option. It will be suitable for coastal communities to adhere to the location, if solutions to the problems of flooding risk, coastal erosion, and the maintenance of coastal facilities can be found. For eastern Chongming wetlands, as a key experimental area for ecosystem-oriented development in Shanghai, the transformation from the reclamation-oriented utilization toward the protection of wetland ecosystems represents the first step toward the latter option. We suggest that the next steps would be to maintain the ecological niche of the wetlands, to create new approaches to coastal engineering with contributions from the ecosystem, and to provide better ecosystem services.
C1 [Bao, Junlin] Fudan Univ, Inst Chinese Hist Geog, Shanghai, Peoples R China.
   [Bao, Junlin] Fudan Univ, Ctr Hist Geog Studies, Shanghai, Peoples R China.
   [Gao, Shu] East China Normal Univ, State Key Lab Estuarine & Coastal Res, Shanghai, Peoples R China.
   [Gao, Shu] Nanjing Univ, Sch Geog & Oceanog Sci, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
C3 Fudan University; Fudan University; East China Normal University;
   Nanjing University
RP Bao, JL (corresponding author), Fudan Univ, Inst Chinese Hist Geog, Shanghai, Peoples R China.; Bao, JL (corresponding author), Fudan Univ, Ctr Hist Geog Studies, Shanghai, Peoples R China.
EM baojunlin@fudan.edu.cn
RI GAO, SHU/KCK-6532-2024; Bao, Junlin/M-6427-2017; Gao, Shu/H-1794-2014
OI Gao, Shu/0000-0001-7850-9753; Bao, Junlin/0000-0001-6839-6329
FU National Social Science Fund of China, through the project "Climate
   change and traditional adaptation on Jiangsu-Shanghai coasts"
   [18BZS156]; Scientific Research and Innovation Program of Shanghai
   Municipal Education Commission [2021-01-07-00-07-E00123]
FX This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China,
   through the project "Climate change and traditional adaptation on
   Jiangsu-Shanghai coasts" (Grant Number: 18BZS156), and the Scientific
   Research and Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education
   Commission, through the major project of humanities and social science,
   entitled "Study on the differentiation process and development mechanism
   of climate change adaptation pattern in historical periods in Shanghai
   City" (Grant Number: 2021-01-07-00-07-E00123).
CR Bao J., 2020, HIST REV-GREECE, V2, P81
   Bao JL, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V162, P799, DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02738-x
   Bao JL, 2019, WETLANDS, V39, P1089, DOI 10.1007/s13157-019-01144-z
   Bao JL, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V82, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.008
   Barros VR, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1133
   Blankespoor B, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P996, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0500-4
   Cai Y. M., 2014, SHANGHAI WETLANDS
   Cao B., 1930, CHRONICLES CHONGMING
   Chen J, 1957, ACTA GEOGRAPHICA SIN, V3, P241
   Chen J., 1988, Comprehensive Survey Report on Coastal Zones and Tideland Resources of Shanghai
   Chen WG, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-04155-0
   Chongming District Government, 2018, MASTER PLAN SHANGHAI
   Chongming District Statistics Bureau, 2020, Chongming District Statistical Yearbook
   Colten CE, 2019, GEOGR REV, V109, P416, DOI 10.1111/gere.12345
   Davidson NC, 2014, MAR FRESHWATER RES, V65, P934, DOI 10.1071/MF14173
   Binh DV, 2020, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100742
   Du SQ, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102037
   Gao S, 2014, SCI CHINA EARTH SCI, V57, P2567, DOI 10.1007/s11430-014-4954-9
   Gao Y., 2006, CHIN AGR SCI B, V8, P475
   Goodwin P., 2001, J COASTAL RES, V27, P1
   Guan D.M., 2012, CHINAS COASTAL WETLA
   Hadley D, 2009, LAND USE POLICY, V26, pS198, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.014
   Hallegatte S, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P802, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1979, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1979]
   Hanson S, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P89, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9977-4
   Hauer ME, 2020, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V1, P28, DOI 10.1038/s43017-019-0002-9
   He Xiaoqin, 2010, Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, V30, P105, DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1140.2010.04105
   He Y., 2020, STUDY COASTAL CHANGE
   Nguyen HH, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V64, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.019
   Nguyen HH, 2016, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V16, P2303, DOI 10.1007/s10113-016-0941-3
   Jiang TT, 2015, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V164, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.07.046
   Kirwan ML, 2013, NATURE, V504, P53, DOI 10.1038/nature12856
   Kunming Survey and Design Institute of State Forestry Administration, 2020, FUNCTIONAL ZONE PLAN
   Larson C., 2015, SCIENCE, DOI [10.1126/science.aad4759, DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.AAD4759]
   Li M., 2006, ACTA GEOGRAPHICA SIN, V3, P282
   Lin D., 1881, CHRONICLES CHONGMING
   Lin QY, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-33406-x
   Lotze HK, 2006, SCIENCE, V312, P1806, DOI 10.1126/science.1128035
   Lu Jian-jian, 2007, Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao, V18, P1097
   Luo XX, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/srep41735
   Ma TT, 2019, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V29, P640, DOI 10.1007/s11769-019-1049-8
   Ma X, 2018, Wetland Science, V16, P304, DOI [10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2018.03.004, DOI 10.13248/J.CNKI.WETLANDSCI.2018.03.004]
   Ma Y., 2006, CHONGMING DONGTAN WE, DOI [10.1007/978-3-211-69325-4, DOI 10.1007/978-3-211-69325-4]
   Ministry of Natural Resources, 2020, CHINA SEA LEVEL B 20
   Ministry of Water Resources, 2003, B CHINA RIVER SEDIME
   Newton A, 2020, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2020.00144
   Nicholls R.J., 1995, GEOJOURNAL, V37, P369, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00814018
   Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, 2018, GLOBAL WETLAND OUTLO
   Schuerch M, 2018, NATURE, V561, P231, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0476-5
   Sha W., 2008, SHANGHAI CONSTRUCTIO, V2, P30
   Shanghai municipality government, 1999, URBAN MASTER PLANNIN
   Shanghai Statistics Bureau, 2019, Shanghai Statistical Yearbook
   Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning Design Institute, 2018, Design of Comprehensive Renovation Plan of Century Park, P104
   Shaotang Chu., 1987, Geographical Research, V6, P9
   Sterzel T, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0220936
   Sun B., 2020, GREEN BOOK CHONGMING, DOI [10.1061/9780784483237.070, DOI 10.1061/9780784483237.070]
   Sun ZG, 2015, ENVIRON INT, V79, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2015.02.017
   Temmerman S, 2015, SCIENCE, V349, P588, DOI 10.1126/science.aac8312
   Temmerman S, 2013, NATURE, V504, P79, DOI 10.1038/nature12859
   The Management Office of Shanghai Chongming Dongtan Bird Nature Reserve, 2006, CHONGMING DONGTAN IN
   The State Council, 2018, NOTICE STRENGTHENING
   The World Bank, 2010, CLIMATE RISKS ADAPTA, DOI [10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00543.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1728-4457.2012.00543.X]
   Tian B, 2010, ECOL ENG, V36, P1383, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.06.016
   Turner RK, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P397, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.006
   UNDESA, 2015, ST/ESA/SER.A/366
   Wang H., 2018, MARINE INFORMAT, V33, P19
   Wang Y., 2012, WETLAND SCI, V1010, P129
   Wei S, 1983, ACAD MONTHLY, V4, P74, DOI [10.19862/j.cnki.xsyk.1983.04.012, DOI 10.19862/J.CNKI.XSYK.1983.04.012]
   Wei W, 2015, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V108, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.05.018
   Woodruff JD, 2018, NATURE, V561, P183, DOI 10.1038/d41586-018-06190-x
   Xiugui Zhang., 2005, Fudan University Journal, Social Sciences, P57
   Xu Z., 2006, SHANGHAI ENV YB
   Yan F., 1799, CHRONICLE LIANGZHE S
   Yang SL, 2011, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V75, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.09.006
   Yang ShiLun Yang ShiLun, 2019, Shanghai Land and Resources, V40, P68
   Yang SL, 2005, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V110, DOI 10.1029/2004JF000271
   Yang SL, 2001, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V38, P167, DOI 10.1016/S0169-555X(00)00079-9
   [姚振兴 Yao Zhenxing], 2017, [长江流域资源与环境, Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin], V26, P698
   Yin J, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2020EF001614
   Yun C, 2010, The pictures and commentary of the Yangtze River Estuary evolution
   Zhang L., 2013, CHRONICLES CHONGMING
   Zhang LQ, 2015, ESTUAR WOR, P137, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-16339-0_7
   Zhang S., 1604, NEW CHRONICLES CHONG
   Zhang W., 1727, CHRONICLES CHONGMING
   Zhang YZ, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104370
   Zhou YX, 2012, STUDY WETLAND RESOUR
   Zhou Z., 1989, Chronicles of Chongming County
   Zhu Y., 1688, CHRONICLES CHONGMING
   Zuo JC, 2013, J OCEAN U CHINA, V12, P327, DOI 10.1007/s11802-013-1908-3
NR 88
TC 11
Z9 11
U1 5
U2 94
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-665X
J9 FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ
JI Front. Environ. Sci.
PD JUN 7
PY 2021
VL 9
AR 627963
DI 10.3389/fenvs.2021.627963
PG 15
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA SV3SK
UT WOS:000663742000001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Tandon, R
   Srinivasan, S
AF Tandon, Rajesh
   Srinivasan, Sumitra
TI Learning from life: The value of everyday knowledge for empowerment and
   change
SO INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF EDUCATION
LA English
DT Article
DE gender issues; education for empowerment; non-formal and informal
   learning; adult education; lifelong learning (policy and practice);
   citizenship education
AB The use of participatory research and participation to promote the empowerment of the poor and marginalised began in the 1970s and gained momentum in the early 1980s. The approach builds on the learning for change paradigm in which everyday experience is the basis for developing agency, and committing to and taking action to create change, both individually and collectively. The paradigm has been used over decades, and in several contexts (e.g. women's literacy and political leadership, work health and safety, access to and control over natural resources, prevention of sexual harassment and violence against women, social accountability and participatory monitoring, access to basic services, and climate adaptation and resilience). In this research note, some of these contexts - work health and safety, women's political leadership, the urban poor and gender-based violence - are used as practical exemplars of work conducted by the non-profit research and training organisation Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA) to support poor, excluded and marginalised communities. The experiences shared in this research note bear witness to the power of popular knowledge and the inclusion of marginalised voices for transformatory, people-centric development.
   Apprendre de la vie : la valeur du savoir quotidien pour le pouvoir d'agir et le changement - L'utilisation de la recherche participative et de la participation pour promouvoir le pouvoir d'agir des personnes pauvres et marginalisees a commence dans les annees 70 et pris de l'ampleur au debut des annees 80. Cette approche s'appuie sur le paradigme de l'apprentissage pour le changement qui se base sur l'experience quotidienne pour developper une action, s'impliquer et agir afin de produire un changement, tant sur le plan individuel que collectif. On utilise ce paradigme depuis des decennies et dans differents contextes (p. ex. l'alphabetisation et le leadership politique des femmes, la sante et la securite au travail, l'acces aux ressources naturelles et leur controle, la prevention du harcelement sexuel et des violences contre les femmes, la responsabilite sociale et sa surveillance participative, l'acces aux services de base et l'adaptation et la resilience au changement climatique). Cette note de recherche prend certains de ces contextes - la sante et la securite au travail, le leadership politique des femmes, la violence urbaine en lien avec la pauvrete et le genre - comme exemples pratiques du travail mene par PRIA (Participatory Research in Asia), une organisation de recherche et de formation a but non lucratif, pour soutenir des communautes pauvres, exclues et marginalisees. Les experiences presentees ici temoignent du pouvoir du savoir populaire et de l'inclusion des voix marginalisees pour un developpement transformateur et axe sur les gens.
C1 [Tandon, Rajesh; Srinivasan, Sumitra] Participatory Res Asia PRIA, New Delhi, India.
RP Tandon, R (corresponding author), Participatory Res Asia PRIA, New Delhi, India.
EM rajesh.tandon@pria.org; sumitra.srinivasan@pria.org
OI Tandon, Rajesh/0000-0001-5119-4720
CR [Anonymous], 2002, Participatory research: Revisiting the roots
   Bebbington A., 2004, Participation: From tyranny to transformation?, P278
   Fernandes W., 1983, PARTICIPATORY RES EV
   Freire P., 1970, PEDAGOGY OPPRESSED
   Gaventa J., 2021, PRIA 40 WEBINAR
   Hall B., 2021, Socially responsible higher education: International perspectives on knowledge democracy
   HALL BL, 1975, CONVERGENCE, V8, P24
   Horton M., 1998, The long haul: An autobiography
   Horton M., 1990, WE MAKE ROAD WALKING
   Mandi PE., 1982, COMMUNITY PARTICIPAT
   Mohanty Ranjita., 2006, PARTICIPATORY CITIZE
   PRIA, 2021, PARTICIPATORY RES GE
   PRIA, 2021, PEOPLES EVERYDAY KNO
   PRIA, 2015, PARTICIPATORY RES PR
   PRIA, 2014, PRIAS ENGAGEMENTS HI
   PRIA (Participatory Research in Asia), 2007, YOUTH PANCHAYAT SYNE
   Rahman MA., 1984, GRASS ROOTS PARTICIP
   Rakhyani N., 2020, J DEV POLICY REV, V1, P120
   Uphoff N., 1992, LEARNING GAL OYA POS, DOI [10.7591/9781501739019, DOI 10.7591/9781501739019]
NR 19
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 6
PU SPRINGERNATURE
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON, N1 9XW, ENGLAND
SN 0020-8566
EI 1573-0638
J9 INT REV EDUC
JI Int. Rev. Educ.
PD APR
PY 2024
VL 70
IS 2
SI SI
BP 253
EP 264
DI 10.1007/s11159-023-10057-3
EA APR 2024
PG 12
WC Education & Educational Research
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Education & Educational Research
GA SK3Q1
UT WOS:001201465400001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sun, YH
   Meng, L
   Tian, L
   Li, GL
   Sun, OJ
AF Sun, Yahui
   Meng, Li
   Tian, Lu
   Li, Guoliang
   Sun, Osbert Jianxin
TI Assessing current stocks and future sequestration potential of forest
   biomass carbon in Daqing Mountain Nature Reserve of Inner Mongolia,
   China
SO JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Carbon sequestration; Climate adaptation; Forest ecosystem; Global
   change; Nature reserve
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; LAND-USE; STORAGE; ECOSYSTEMS; CHRONOSEQUENCE; BALANCE;
   FLUXES
AB Assessment of regional forest carbon stocks and underlying controls is critical for guiding forest management in the context of carbon sequestration. We investigated the variations in tree biomass carbon stocks relating to forest types, and estimated the total tree biomass carbon stocks and projected gains through natural stand development by 2020 and 2050 in the Daqing Mountain Nature Reserve based on Category II data of the Forest Inventory of Inner Mongolia for the period ending 2008. Over a total area of 388,577 ha, this nature reserve currently stores an estimated 2221 GgC in tree aboveground biomass alone, with potential to grow by more than 30 % to reach 2938 GgC by 2020 and nearly double to 4092 GgC by 2050 through natural development of the existing forest stands. The tree biomass carbon density and potential gain in tree biomass carbon stocks vary markedly among forest types and with stand development. The variations in the potential change of tree biomass carbon density for the periods 2008-2020 and 2008-2050 among forest types partly reflect the varying relationships of tree biomass carbon density with stand age for different tree species, and partly are attributable to variations in the stand age structure among different forest types. Of the major forest types, the ranking of projected changes in tree biomass carbon density are not consistent with variations in the relationship between tree biomass carbon density and stand age, neither are they explainable by variations in stand age structures, implying the interactive effect between forest type and stand dynamics on temporal changes in tree biomass carbon density. Birch rank highest for future biomass carbon sequestration because of its dominance in cover area and better age structure for potential gain in tree biomass carbon stocks. Poplar and larch were out-performers compared to other forest types given their greater contribution to total tree biomass carbon stocks relative to their distributional areas. Findings in this study illustrate that protection and proper management of under-aged forests can deliver marked gains in biomass carbon sequestration. This is of great importance to policy-makers as well as to scientific communities in seeking effective solutions for adaptive forest management and mitigation of anthropogenic greenhouse gases emissions using forest ecosystems.
C1 [Sun, Yahui; Sun, Osbert Jianxin] Beijing Forestry Univ, Coll Forest Sci, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.
   [Meng, Li] Survey & Planning Inst State Forestry Adm, Beijing 100714, Peoples R China.
   [Tian, Lu; Li, Guoliang] Inner Mongolia Inst Forest Monitoring & Planning, Hohhot 010020, Peoples R China.
   [Sun, Osbert Jianxin] Beijing Forestry Univ, Inst Forestry & Climate Change Res, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.
C3 Beijing Forestry University; Beijing Forestry University
RP Sun, OJ (corresponding author), Beijing Forestry Univ, Coll Forest Sci, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.; Sun, OJ (corresponding author), Beijing Forestry Univ, Inst Forestry & Climate Change Res, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.
EM sunjianx@bjfu.edu.cn
RI Li, Guo/A-8455-2012
FU Program for Public-Welfare Forestry of the State Forestry Administration
   of China [201104008]
FX This study was funded by the Program for Public-Welfare Forestry of the
   State Forestry Administration of China (Grant No. 201104008).
CR [Anonymous], 2010, Estimation and Evaluation of Forest Biomass Carbon Storage in China
   Buongiorno J, 2015, FOR ECOSYST, V2, DOI 10.1186/s40663-015-0030-y
   Chen GS, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V300, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.07.046
   Chen QQ, 2013, CHINESE SCI BULL, V58, P1551, DOI 10.1007/s11434-012-5100-8
   Dai LM, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V300, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.046
   Fang JY, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P2320, DOI 10.1126/science.1058629
   Houghton RA, 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V11, P945, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00955.x
   Houghton RA, 2003, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V17, DOI 10.1029/2002GB001970
   Law BE, 2003, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V9, P510, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00624.x
   Law BE, 2004, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V10, P1429, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00822.x
   Liu P, 2012, FORESTS, V3, P417, DOI 10.3390/f3020417
   NDRC/PRC (The National Development and Reform Commission The People's Republic of China), 2012, CHIN POL ACT ADDR CL
   Pachauri R.K., 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014
   Piao SL, 2009, NATURE, V458, P1009, DOI 10.1038/nature07944
   SFA-PRC, 2010, CHIN FOR RES REP 7 N
   Turner DP, 2003, TELLUS B, V55, P657, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0889.2003.01416.x
   Wofsy SC, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P2261, DOI 10.1126/science.1061077
   Xu B, 2010, SCI CHINA LIFE SCI, V53, P776, DOI 10.1007/s11427-010-4030-4
   Zeng Wei-Sheng, 2014, Forest Ecosystems, V1, P20, DOI 10.1186/s40663-014-0020-5
   Zeng WS, 2015, FOR ECOSYST, V2, DOI 10.1186/s40663-015-0047-2
   Zhang YD, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V300, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.010
NR 21
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 5
U2 74
PU NORTHEAST FORESTRY UNIV
PI HARBIN
PA NO 26 HEXING RD, XIANGFANG DISTRICT, HARBIN, 150040, PEOPLES R CHINA
SN 1007-662X
EI 1993-0607
J9 J FORESTRY RES
JI J. For. Res.
PD AUG
PY 2016
VL 27
IS 4
BP 931
EP 938
DI 10.1007/s11676-016-0214-5
PG 8
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA DP9GX
UT WOS:000378805800022
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sjulgard, H
   Keller, T
   Garland, G
   Colombi, T
AF Sjulgard, Hanna
   Keller, Thomas
   Garland, Gina
   Colombi, Tino
TI Relationships between weather and yield anomalies vary with crop type
   and latitude in Sweden
SO AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Weather anomalies; Weather extremes; Crop productivity; Growing season;
   Field crops
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; HIGH-TEMPERATURE; MAIZE YIELD; DROUGHT; HEAT; IMPACT;
   WHEAT; AGRICULTURE; VARIABILITY; BARLEY
AB CONTEXT: Information on how crop yields are affected by weather variations and extreme weather is needed to develop climate adaptation measures for arable cropping systems. Here, we analysed the effects of weather anomalies and soil texture on crop yield anomalies across Sweden from 1965 to 2020.OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to (i) assess the effects of temperature and precipitation anomalies and extreme weather on crop yield anomalies for major field crops across Sweden, (ii) quantify how crop responses to weather anomalies vary along the north-south climate gradient across Sweden, and (iii) elucidate the impacts of soil texture on yield responses to weather anomalies.METHODS: We used daily mean air temperature, daily total precipitation, soil texture and crop yield data from public databases covering all 21 counties in Sweden. Yield data was detrended to account for the effects of agricultural intensification on crop productivity. To assess seasonal weather influences on crop yields, temporal trends of daily average temperature and daily total precipitation were detrended for each season containing a three-month period. We also used a water balance index and a heat wave index to evaluate the impact of extreme weather.RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses showed that years with extreme weather during summer (i.e. heat waves, drought or water excess) resulted in the largest negative yield anomalies. Spring-sown crops were more negatively affected by extreme weather compared to autumn-sown crops, which we associate with differences in the lengths of the growth period for autumn-and spring-sown crops. Effects of soil texture on yield anomalies were found for spring-sown cereals, where negative effects of drought were exacerbated with increasing sand content. Moreover, we showed that the effects of weather conditions on crop yield anomalies differed between different regions within the country. In northern Sweden, crop yields were more sensitive to excess water, while drought effects were more pronounced in southern Sweden. Similarly, increased summer temperatures favoured crop yields in northern Sweden but had a negative impact on crop yields in the southern part of the country. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study demonstrates that weather impacts on yields vary between crops and locations, and that adaptation to future climate will require crop-and site-specific strategies.
C1 [Sjulgard, Hanna; Keller, Thomas; Garland, Gina; Colombi, Tino] SLU, Dept Soil & Environm, Uppsala, Sweden.
   [Keller, Thomas] Agroscope, Dept Agroecol & Environm, Zurich, Switzerland.
   [Garland, Gina] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Environm Syst Sci, Zurich, Switzerland.
C3 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Swiss Federal Research
   Station Agroscope; Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology Domain; ETH
   Zurich
RP Sjulgard, H (corresponding author), SLU, Dept Soil & Environm, Uppsala, Sweden.
EM Hanna.sjulgard@slu.se
RI Sjulgard, Hanna/KFF-5420-2024
OI Garland, Gina/0000-0002-1657-3669; Colombi, Tino/0000-0001-8493-4430
FU Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry [GFS2020-0061];
   Swedish Farmers' Foundation for Agricultural Research [O-19-23-309]
FX We would like to thank Dr. Elsa Coucheney (Department of Soil and
   Environment, SLU, Sweden) for constructive feedback and valuable
   comments on this manuscript. Funding from the Royal Swedish Academy of
   Agriculture and Forestry (Kungliga Skogs- och Lant- bruksakademien,
   KSLA; grant number: GFS2020-0061) and the Swedish Farmers' Foundation
   for Agricultural Research (Stiftelsen Lant- bruksforskning, SLF, grant
   number: O-19-23-309) is greatly acknowledged.
CR AKAIKE H, 1974, IEEE T AUTOMAT CONTR, VAC19, P716, DOI 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   Almaraz JJ, 2008, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V88, P187, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9408-y
   Ploschuk RA, 2018, FRONT PLANT SCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.01863
   AVERY BW, 1973, J SOIL SCI, V24, P324, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1973.tb00769.x
   Barlow KM, 2015, FIELD CROP RES, V171, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.11.010
   Begueria Santiago, 2023, CRAN
   Belyaeva M, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V149, P205, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2221-3
   Ceglar A, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aba1be
   Chakraborty D, 2019, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V138, P1925, DOI 10.1007/s00704-019-02939-0
   de Almeida LMM, 2021, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V185, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104400
   de San Celedonio RP, 2014, PLANT SOIL, V378, P265, DOI 10.1007/s11104-014-2028-6
   Delin Sofia, 2005, Precision Agriculture, V6, P321, DOI 10.1007/s11119-005-2325-4
   Droogers P., 2002, Irrigation and Drainage Systems, V16, P33, DOI 10.1023/A:1015508322413
   Eck MA, 2020, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108053
   Eckersten H, 2012, ACTA AGR SCAND B-S P, V62, P151, DOI 10.1080/09064710.2011.585176
   Eckersten H, 2010, CLIM RES, V42, P119, DOI 10.3354/cr00867
   Eklund A., 2015, Klimatologi, V14, P94
   Fahad S, 2017, FRONT PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01147
   Finnish Cereal Committee, 2014, Production of Cereal and Oilseed Crops in Finland
   Gammans M, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa6b0c
   Giannakaki P, 2019, CLIM RES, V78, P135, DOI 10.3354/cr01563
   Gilleland Eric, 2024, CRAN
   Gourdji SM, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024041
   Gupta S, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5206
   Hakala K, 2012, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V150, P145, DOI 10.1017/S0021859611000694
   Hatfield JL, 2015, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V10, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001
   He Y, 2014, SCI REP-UK, V4, DOI 10.1038/srep05736
   Howden SM, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P19691, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701890104
   Huang JY, 2021, AGR SYST, V190, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103085
   Jannat A, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14106051
   Jiang YF, 2021, AGR WATER MANAGE, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107047
   JUMA NG, 1993, GEODERMA, V57, P3, DOI 10.1016/0016-7061(93)90145-B
   Klink K, 2014, INT J CLIMATOL, V34, P2805, DOI 10.1002/joc.3877
   Koppensteiner LJ, 2021, ACTA AGR SCAND B-S P, V71, P806, DOI 10.1080/09064710.2021.1950205
   Koscielny CB, 2018, CROP PASTURE SCI, V69, P284, DOI [10.1071/cp17259, 10.1071/CP17259]
   Labudová L, 2017, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V128, P491, DOI 10.1007/s00704-016-1870-2
   Lesk C, 2022, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V3, P872, DOI 10.1038/s43017-022-00368-8
   Li Y, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P2325, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14628
   Lobell DB, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P616, DOI [10.1126/science.1206376, 10.1126/science.1204531]
   Lopes MS, 2022, FOOD ENERGY SECUR, V11, DOI 10.1002/fes3.372
   Ming B, 2015, J INTEGR AGR, V14, P660, DOI 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60778-4
   Monteleone B, 2023, NAT HAZARDS, V116, P2761, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05791-0
   Morel J, 2021, FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S, V5, DOI 10.3389/fsufs.2021.665025
   Najeeb U, 2015, AOB PLANTS, V7, DOI 10.1093/aobpla/plv080
   Olesen JE, 2011, EUR J AGRON, V34, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2010.11.003
   Peel MC, 2007, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V11, P1633, DOI 10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007
   Peltonen-Sainio P, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P1505, DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0594-z
   Peltonen-Sainio P, 2010, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V139, P483, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2010.09.006
   Ploschuk RA, 2020, J AGRON CROP SCI, V206, P363, DOI 10.1111/jac.12396
   Powell JP, 2016, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V12, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2016.02.003
   Pradhan GP, 2012, FUNCT PLANT BIOL, V39, P190, DOI 10.1071/FP11245
   R Core Team, 2023, R: The R Project for Statistical Computing
   Ray DK, 2015, NAT COMMUN, V6, DOI 10.1038/ncomms6989
   Raza A, 2019, PLANTS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/plants8020034
   Rötter RP, 2011, EUR J AGRON, V35, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2011.06.003
   Rötter RP, 2013, ECOL EVOL, V3, P4197, DOI 10.1002/ece3.782
   Russo S, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124003
   SCB, 2023, Skordar efter lan/riket och groda. Ar 1965-2021
   SCB, 2020, STAT
   Shah NH, 2003, PLANT SOIL, V257, P219, DOI 10.1023/A:1026237816578
   Sjulgård H, 2022, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V336, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2022.108046
   SMHI, 2022, Klimatindikator-vegetationsperiodens langd
   SMHI, 2020, Ladda ner meteorologiska observationer
   Smit B., 2002, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, V7, P85, DOI 10.1023/A:1015862228270
   Smith WN, 2013, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V179, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2013.08.015
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), 2020, National data host lakes and watercourses, and national data host agricultural land
   Tian YL, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0095108
   Trnka M, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2298, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02396.x
   Uleberg E, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P27, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0983-1
   Vicente-Serrano SM, 2012, EARTH INTERACT, V16, DOI 10.1175/2012EI000434.1
   Vicente-Serrano SM, 2010, J CLIMATE, V23, P1696, DOI 10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1
   Vico G, 2014, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V197, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.06.003
   Wang HS, 2016, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V228, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.06.004
   Wang LS, 2022, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/agronomy12071509
   Ylhäisi JS, 2010, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V10, P1563, DOI 10.5194/nhess-10-1563-2010
   Zhao C, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms13530
   Zhao ZL, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0202966
NR 78
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 8
U2 24
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0308-521X
EI 1873-2267
J9 AGR SYST
JI Agric. Syst.
PD OCT
PY 2023
VL 211
AR 103757
DI 10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103757
EA SEP 2023
PG 9
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA T3NK0
UT WOS:001077084900001
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Odhiambo, JA
   Weiser, SD
   Frongillo, EA
   Burger, RL
   Weke, E
   Wekesa, P
   Bukusi, EA
   Cohen, CR
AF Odhiambo, Jackline A.
   Weiser, Sheri D.
   Frongillo, Edward A.
   Burger, Rachel L.
   Weke, Elly
   Wekesa, Pauline
   Bukusi, Elizabeth A.
   Cohen, Craig R.
TI Comparing the effect of a multisectoral agricultural intervention on
   HIV-related health outcomes between widowed and married women
SO SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
LA English
DT Article
DE Widowhood; Marital status; Food insecurity; Depression; HIV; AIDS;
   Social support; Stigma; Africa
ID HIV/AIDS; QUESTIONNAIRE; DETERMINANTS; STIGMA
AB Introduction: Widowed women make up 18-40% of the 12 million women living with HIV in eastern and southern Africa. Widowhood has also been associated with greater HIV morbidity and mortality. We compared the effectiveness of a multisectoral climate adaptive agricultural livelihood intervention (called Shamba Maisha) on food insecurity, and HIV related health outcomes among widowed and married women living with HIV in western Kenya.Methods: We implemented Shamba Maisha (NCT02815579) using a cluster-randomized control trial design. The intervention arm received an US$175 in-kind loan to purchase a micro-irrigation pump, seeds, and fertilizer, and received eight training sessions on sustainable agriculture and financial management. Study outcomes were measured every 6 months over a 24-month follow-up period and trends in outcomes assessed using multilevel mixed-effects models.Results: The trial enrolled 232 (61.5%) married and 145 (38.5%) widowed women. Widowed women (mean age 42.8 & PLUSMN; 8.4 years) were older than married women (35.8 & PLUSMN; 9.0 years) (p < 0.01). Almost all widowed women (97.2%) self-identified as household heads compared to 10.8% of married women. Comparing widowed vs married women, reduction in food insecurity (-3.13, 95%CI-4.42,-1.84 vs.-3.08, 95%CI-4.15,-2.02), depressive symptoms (-0.21, 95%CI-0.36,-0.07 vs.-0.19, 95%CI-0.29,-0.08), internalized stigma (-0.33, 95%CI-0.55,-0.11 vs.-0.38, 95%CI-0.57,-0.19), and anticipated stigma (-0.46 95%CI-0.65,-0.28 vs.-0.35, 95%CI-0.50,-0.21) was similar for both groups. In contrast, improvements in social support (-2.22, 95%CI-3.85,-0.59 vs.-4.00, 95%CI-5.16,-2.84; p = 0.08) and reduction in enacted stigma (0.01, 95%CI-0.06, 0.08 vs.-0.14, 95%CI-0.20,-0.09; p < 0.01) were weaker for widowed than married women.Conclusions: Our study is among the first comparing the effect of a livelihood intervention on HIV health out-comes among widowed and married women. Widowed women experienced similar benefits as married women on individual-level outcomes, but weaker benefit on outcomes dependent on their external environment like enacted stigma and social support. Future trials and programs targeting widowed women should bolster stigma reduction and social support.
C1 [Odhiambo, Jackline A.] Maseno Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Dev, Maseno, Kenya.
   [Odhiambo, Jackline A.] Nyanam Widows Rising, Kisumu, Kenya.
   [Weiser, Sheri D.] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA.
   [Frongillo, Edward A.] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Columbia, SC USA.
   [Burger, Rachel L.] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, San Francisco, CA USA.
   [Weke, Elly; Wekesa, Pauline; Bukusi, Elizabeth A.] Kenya Govt Med Res Ctr, Ctr Microbiol Res, Nairobi, Kenya.
   [Cohen, Craig R.] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA USA.
   [Odhiambo, Jackline A.] Maseno Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Dev, POB 3871-40100, Maseno 40100, Kenya.
C3 Maseno University; University of California System; University of
   California San Francisco; University of South Carolina System;
   University of South Carolina Columbia; University of California System;
   University of California San Francisco; Kenya Medical Research
   Institute; University of California System; University of California San
   Francisco; Maseno University
RP Odhiambo, JA (corresponding author), Maseno Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Dev, POB 3871-40100, Maseno 40100, Kenya.
EM jackline.odhiambo@nyanam.org
OI Bukusi, Elizabeth Anne/0000-0002-2031-2808; Burger,
   Rachel/0000-0001-9373-2910; Cohen, Craig/0000-0001-8654-6634
FU Fogarty International Center (FIC) of the National Institutes of Health
   (NIH) [D43TW011306]; Fogarty International Center of the NIH
   [1R01MH107330]; John E. Fogarty International Center for Advanced Study
   in the Health Sciences; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of
   Child Health and Human Development [D43TW011306] Funding Source: NIH
   RePORTER; National Institute of Mental Health [D43TW011306] Funding
   Source: NIH RePORTER
FX JAO is a Doctoral Fellow in the Sustainable Development for HIV Health
   (SD4H) training program and was supported by Fogarty International
   Center (FIC) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award
   Number D43TW011306. The research reported in this publication was
   supported by the Fogarty International Center of the NIH under Award
   Number 1R01MH107330. The content is solely the responsibility of the
   authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the
   NIH. "
CR Adejumo Olusola Adedeji, 2020, Afr J Infect Dis, V14, P16, DOI 10.21010/ajid.v14i1.3
   Agot K., 2015, ANTHR AFRICA CHALLEN, P55
   Agot KE, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0014028
   Antelman G, 2001, AIDS, V15, P1865, DOI 10.1097/00002030-200109280-00017
   Bolton P, 2004, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V39, P442, DOI 10.1007/s00127-004-0763-3
   Bukenya D, 2019, AIDS RES THER, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12981-018-0214-y
   Chang W., 2020, What Works to Enhance Women's Agency: Cross-Cutting Lessons from Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies
   Chapoto A, 2011, ECON DEV CULT CHANGE, V59, P511, DOI 10.1086/658346
   Coates J AS, 2007, Household food insecurity access scale (HFIAS) for measurement of household food access: indicator guide, V3, DOI DOI 10.1037/E576842013-001
   Cohen CR, 2022, JAMA NETW OPEN, V5, DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.46158
   Cohen CR, 2015, SPRINGERPLUS, V4, DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-0886-x
   Daka DW, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0229883
   Hailu BA, 2020, BMC INFECT DIS, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12879-020-05456-y
   Harling G, 2020, J GERONTOL B-PSYCHOL, V75, P148, DOI 10.1093/geronb/gby013
   Izumi K., 2007, GENDER DEV, V15, P11, DOI [10.1080/13552070601178823, DOI 10.1080/13552070601178823]
   Kalichman SC, 2009, AIDS CARE, V21, P87, DOI 10.1080/09540120802032627
   Kim JC, 2007, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V97, P1794, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2006.095521
   Klugman J., 2014, VOICE AGENCY EMPOWER, DOI DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-0359-8
   Ky-Zerbo O, 2014, SANTE PUBLIQUE, V26, P375, DOI 10.3917/spub.139.0375
   Lopman BA, 2009, SEX TRANSM INFECT, V85, pI41, DOI 10.1136/sti.2008.033043
   Magadi M, 2021, CULT HEALTH SEX, V23, P822, DOI 10.1080/13691058.2020.1734661
   Mast TC, 2004, AIDS CARE, V16, P81, DOI 10.1080/09540120310001633994
   Mekonen T, 2021, BMJ OPEN, V11, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048931
   Ndiaye L., 2015, ETUDES MORT, V147, P181, DOI [10.3917/eslm.147.0181, DOI 10.3917/ESLM.147.0181]
   Nigusso FT, 2020, PEERJ, V8, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8558
   O'Laughlin KN, 2016, BMC INFECT DIS, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12879-016-2021-1
   Olaleye A, 2013, J HEALTH CARE POOR U, V24, P247, DOI 10.1353/hpu.2013.0001
   Olawa BD, 2021, J WOMEN AGING, V33, P268, DOI 10.1080/08952841.2019.1690370
   Oyugi JH, 2004, JAIDS-J ACQ IMM DEF, V36, P1100, DOI 10.1097/00126334-200408150-00014
   Papageorgiou V, 2022, AIDS BEHAV, V26, P2026, DOI 10.1007/s10461-021-03551-y
   Perry B, 2014, J INT AIDS SOC, V17, DOI 10.7448/IAS.17.1.19010
   Ramnarain S, 2016, FEM ECON, V22, P80, DOI 10.1080/13545701.2015.1075657
   Ruzagira E, 2018, AIDS CARE, V30, P879, DOI 10.1080/09540121.2018.1441967
   Seid S, 2020, INT J MENT HEALTH SY, V14, DOI 10.1186/s13033-020-00389-0
   Singer AW, 2015, AIDS BEHAV, V19, P1510, DOI 10.1007/s10461-014-0873-1
   Sinku Y, 2016, HIV AIDS-RES PALLIAT, V8, P135, DOI 10.2147/HIV.S110337
   The Loomba Foundation, 2015, GLOBAL OVERVIEW DEPR, V44
   UNAIDS, 2022, Global HIV statistics-Fact sheet 2022
   Weiser SD, 2015, AIDS, V29, P1889, DOI 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000781
   Weiser SD, 2011, AM J CLIN NUTR, V94, p1729S, DOI 10.3945/ajcn.111.012070
   WU AW, 1991, MED CARE, V29, P786, DOI 10.1097/00005650-199108000-00011
   Yimer S, 2021, HIV AIDS-RES PALLIAT, V13, P917, DOI 10.2147/HIV.S329256
NR 42
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 1
U2 2
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0277-9536
EI 1873-5347
J9 SOC SCI MED
JI Soc. Sci. Med.
PD AUG
PY 2023
VL 330
AR 116031
DI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116031
EA JUN 2023
PG 7
WC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Social Sciences, Biomedical
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Biomedical Social Sciences
GA N2OU6
UT WOS:001035476200001
PM 37390805
OA Green Accepted, Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Odgaard, MV
   Turner, KG
   Bocher, PK
   Svenning, JC
   Dalgaard, T
AF Odgaard, Mette Vestergaard
   Turner, Katrine Grace
   Bocher, Peder K.
   Svenning, Jens-Christian
   Dalgaard, Tommy
TI A multi-criteria, ecosystem-service value method used to assess
   catchment suitability for potential wetland reconstruction in Denmark
SO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
LA English
DT Article
DE Catchment screening; Reconstructed wetlands; Restored wetlands;
   Ecosystem services; Hotspot analysis; Multi-criteria; Scenario mapping
ID WATER MANAGEMENT; LAND-USE; CONSERVATION; FUTURE; BIODIVERSITY;
   SCENARIOS; CLIMATE; GIS
AB Wetlands provide a range of ecosystem services such as drought resistance, flood resistance, nutrient deposition, biodiversity, etc. This study presents a new multi-criteria, ecosystems service value-driven method to drive the optimal placement of restored wetlands in terms of maximizing selected ecosystem services which a wetland can provide or affect. We aim to answer two questions: 1) which of the ecosystem services indicators defines the placement of wetlands today? 2) Based on the ecosystem services indicator assessment, what are the recommendations for future selection of catchments for potential wetland reconstruction (i.e. restoration)?
   Five key ecosystem services indicators produced or affected by wetlands in Denmark were mapped (recreational potential, biodiversity, nitrogen mitigation potential, inverse land rent, and flash-flood risk). These services were compared to current placements of wetlands. Furthermore, scenario testing and hotspot analysis were combined to provide future recommendations for optimal placements of wetlands. The scenarios investigated were Climate Adaptation and Protection of Aquatic Environment, Land-Based Economy, and Rich Nature. Based on these scenarios, the most suitable areas for wetland reconstruction were mapped, taking both the scenarios and attached weightings of ecosystem services indicators into account.
   According to statistical results current reconstructed wetlands are situated in catchments with lower biodiversity, higher nitrogen mitigation potential, higher land rent (i.e. agricultural intensive areas), and to some extent higher flash flood risk compared to the median of catchments with wetlands. Hence, recreation potential, high biodiversity, and low land rent has not been prioritized. 35 out of the 3023 catchments investigated were identified with an especially high suitability when optimizing all scenarios. This coincides with a high suitability around peri-urban and urban areas and near natural areas, hence capturing both supply and demand services. Of the 35 identified catchments with potentially high suitability, only 2 actually hold a presently reconstructed wetland. This indicates a prior placement with almost no consideration of maximizing ecosystem services benefits.
   We recommend a systematic approach, such as the ecosystem service value-driven method demonstrated in the present case study, to target more services and improve the overall benefit from wetlands. This approach seeks to inform decision makers of synergies in the landscape, which is likely to transcend future policy implementations. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Odgaard, Mette Vestergaard; Turner, Katrine Grace; Dalgaard, Tommy] Aarhus Univ, Dept Agroecol, Foulum, Blichers Alle 20,POB 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.
   [Turner, Katrine Grace; Bocher, Peder K.; Svenning, Jens-Christian] Aarhus Univ, Dept Biosci, Ny Munkegade 116, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
C3 Aarhus University; Aarhus University
RP Odgaard, MV (corresponding author), Aarhus Univ, Dept Agroecol, Foulum, Blichers Alle 20,POB 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.
EM mettevestergaardodgaard@agro.au.dk; katrine.grace.turner@gmail.com;
   peder.bocher@bios.au.dk; svenning@bios.au.dk; tommy.dalgaard@agro.au.dk
RI Svenning, Jens-Christian/C-8977-2012; Dalgaard, Tommy/G-4533-2016
OI Dalgaard, Tommy/0000-0001-8020-0034
FU Velux foundation; Danish Innovation Fund; dNmark Research Alliance;
   institute of Agroecology
FX The development and testing of the present method is dependent on
   previously develop methods and datasets as well as expertise within each
   of the ecosystem service areas included. Thanks to good colleagues,
   especially from Aarhus University Departments of Environmental Sciences
   (Mette Termansen et al.), Agroecology (Christen Duus Borgesen, Inge T.
   Kristensen et al.), Morten Revsbech at Scalgo.dk, and Bioscience Kalo
   (Jesper Moeslund et al.) for all their kind help and assistance. Also, a
   large thanks to both the Velux foundation sponsored
   www.fremtidenslandbrug.dk project, as well as the Danish Innovation
   Fund, the dNmark Research Alliance www.dnmark.org, and the
   www.buffertech.dk project for funding this study. Finally, thanks to the
   institute of Agroecology and the Velux foundation for funding the Ph.D.
   of Katrine Grace Turner who contributed substantial to this specific
   paper.
CR Adhikari AR, 2011, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V180, P97, DOI 10.1007/s10661-010-1775-y
   Agger P., 2012, DANMARKS NATUR FREM
   [Anonymous], MILJ OG NAT KORT
   [Anonymous], REKREATIVE VAERDI NA
   [Anonymous], 2014, Biodiversitetskort for Danmark
   [Anonymous], VADOMRADER NORDEN RA
   [Anonymous], DHM2007DTM DKDEM
   [Anonymous], 2011, Human Development Report
   [Anonymous], ANAL IPCC DELRAPPOI
   [Anonymous], DAN NAT TOP MAP KORT
   [Anonymous], EU FARM STRUCT SURV
   [Anonymous], DETALJERET BESKRIVEL
   [Anonymous], 1997, Economic valuation of wetlands: a guide for policy makers and planners
   [Anonymous], SCENARIER FREMTIDENS
   [Anonymous], DAN HYDR MOD CORR DH
   [Anonymous], SCALGO HYDR FLOOD M
   [Anonymous], INT J ADV RES
   [Anonymous], 2014, 052 DCA
   [Anonymous], ANAL LANDBRUGETS OMK
   [Anonymous], 2005, SCENARIOS
   [Anonymous], J GEOPHYS RES ATMOS
   Bai Y, 2011, ECOL COMPLEX, V8, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2011.01.007
   Barbier EB, 2011, HYDROLOG SCI J, V56, P1360, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2011.629787
   Bateman IJ, 2013, SCIENCE, V341, P45, DOI 10.1126/science.1234379
   Beatty WS, 2014, BIOL CONSERV, V176, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.05.018
   Brander LM, 2012, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V52, P395, DOI 10.1007/s10640-011-9535-1
   Burkhard B, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V21, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
   Carpenter SR, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P1305, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0808772106
   Chave P., 2001, The EU Water Framework Directive
   Costanza R, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V26, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
   Cowling RM, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P9483, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0706559105
   Dalgaard T, 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/115002
   Dick J, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V38, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.10.023
   Egoh B, 2008, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V127, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.03.013
   Ellis EC, 2010, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V19, P589, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00540.x
   Esri, 2012, ArcMap (version 10.1) Software
   Fisher B, 2011, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V48, P151, DOI 10.1007/s10640-010-9415-0
   Ghermandi A, 2010, WATER RESOUR RES, V46, DOI 10.1029/2010WR009071
   Grenyer R, 2006, NATURE, V444, P93, DOI 10.1038/nature05237
   Greve M, 2013, NAT COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1038/ncomms3975
   Greve MH, 2007, GEOGR TIDSSKR-DEN, V107, P1
   Greve MH, 2014, SOIL SCI, V179, P250, DOI 10.1097/SS.0000000000000066
   Hansson LA, 2005, FRESHWATER BIOL, V50, P705, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01352.x
   Harrington R, 2011, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V63, P2929, DOI 10.2166/wst.2011.591
   Hojberg A.L., 2015, NATL KVAELSTOFMODEL
   Jarchow ME, 2012, INT J AGR SUSTAIN, V10, P76, DOI 10.1080/14735903.2012.646730
   Jelinski DE, 1996, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V11, P129, DOI 10.1007/BF02447512
   Kayranli B, 2010, WETLANDS, V30, P111, DOI 10.1007/s13157-009-0003-4
   Kristensen K.M., 2008, REESTIMATION FURTHER
   Kronvang B, 2008, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V11, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2007.10.007
   Levin G, 2012, BASEMAP TECHNICAL DO
   Mace GM, 2012, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V27, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006
   Maltby E, 2011, HYDROLOG SCI J, V56, P1341, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2011.631014
   Melbourne-Thomas J, 2011, ECOL APPL, V21, P1380, DOI 10.1890/09-1564.1
   Merken R, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0135445
   Moeslund JE, 2009, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V8, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/8/1/012022
   Moore D, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V16, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.013
   Naidoo R, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P9495, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0707823105
   Ogden L.E., 2015, Bioscience, V65, P452, DOI DOI 10.1093/BIOSCI/BIV021
   Okruszko T, 2011, HYDROLOG SCI J, V56, P1501, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2011.631188
   Pachauri R.K., 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014
   Parsons G.R., 2003, Chapter 9 in a Primer for Nonmarket Valuation, P269, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0826-6_9
   Pereira HM, 2010, SCIENCE, V330, P1496, DOI 10.1126/science.1196624
   PETIT LJ, 1995, WILDLIFE SOC B, V23, P420
   R Core Team, 2022, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
   Raudsepp-Hearne C, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P5242, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0907284107
   Raymond CM, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P1301, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.006
   Russi D., 2013, EC ECOSYSTEMS BIODIV, V78, P118
   Seppelt R, 2011, J APPL ECOL, V48, P630, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x
   Steffen W, 2015, SCIENCE, V347, DOI 10.1126/science.1259855
   Swetnam RD, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P563, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.007
   Turner KG, 2016, ECOL MODEL, V319, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.07.017
   Turner KG, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.007
   Whitfield S, 2012, J ARID ENVIRON, V77, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.09.015
   Willemen L, 2010, ECOL ECON, V69, P2244, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.012
NR 75
TC 31
Z9 33
U1 4
U2 134
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1470-160X
EI 1872-7034
J9 ECOL INDIC
JI Ecol. Indic.
PD JUN
PY 2017
VL 77
BP 151
EP 165
DI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.001
PG 15
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA FB9BY
UT WOS:000406435800017
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Booth, TH
AF Booth, Trevor H.
TI Eucalypt plantations and climate change
SO FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Vulnerability; Adaptation; Carbon dioxide; Simulation models; Database
ID ELEVATED ATMOSPHERIC CO2; FOREST; AUSTRALIA; GROWTH; IMPACT; CHINA
AB Eucalypts are grown in plantations in more than 90 countries, so it is important to assess their vulnerability to climate change. Global mean annual temperature over land has already increased by about 0.9 degrees C in the last century and many countries have agreed that urgent action should be taken to limit the increase in global mean temperature below 2 degrees C. Unfortunately, as emissions are currently tracking at higher levels than the worst case scenario envisaged by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change it appears increasingly unlikely that temperature increase can be limited to 2 degrees C. This paper assesses the vulnerability of eucalypt plantations to climate change. Vulnerability is a function of potential impact, which is related to exposure and sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. Eucalypt plantations total more than 20 million hectares and are grown in many countries around the world, so have significant exposure to climate change. About 41% of more than 800 eucalypt taxa grow naturally in Australia within narrow climatic ranges of less than 2 degrees C, so are potentially sensitive to climatic change. Fortunately, the small number of commercially important species tend to have much wider climatic tolerances, but genetic selection to improve growth may well be reducing their climatic adaptability. Efforts have been made to simulate eucalypt growth under changing climatic and atmospheric conditions. If photosynthesis and water use efficiency are increased by increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels then some plantations may enjoy significant yield increases. However, recent results from eucalypts growing under elevated CO2 conditions in whole tree chambers suggest there is little if any 'fertilisation effect' on photosynthesis, though water use efficiency is increased. Consequently, productivity may increase in some plantations and decrease in others. Fortunately, the adaptive capacity of eucalypt plantations is high. Many eucalypts are grown on short rotations of less than ten years, so changing silvicultural practices and planting different genotypes to match changing climatic conditions is relatively easy. While the vulnerability of eucalypt plantations is only at a medium level it is concluded that sharing information about where particular eucalypt genotypes are grown, identifying potentially marginal climatic areas and recommending genotypes suitable for changing conditions would help to further reduce potential vulnerability. The development of a eucalypt database and mapping system is proposed as a major collaborative project to help to protect one of global forestry's most valuable resources. Crown Copyright (c) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Booth, Trevor H.] CSIRO Ecosyst Sci, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
   [Booth, Trevor H.] CSIRO Climate Adaptat Flagship, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
C3 Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO);
   Ecosystem Sciences; Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research
   Organisation (CSIRO)
RP Booth, TH (corresponding author), CSIRO Ecosyst Sci, GPOB 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
EM Trevor.Booth@csiro.au
RI Booth, Trevor/B-5514-2011
OI Booth, Trevor/0000-0001-8506-7287
CR Ainsworth EA, 2007, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V30, P258, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01641.x
   Alfenas A. C., 2011, IUFRO C IMPR CULT EU, P51
   Allen Consulting Group, 2005, CLIM CHANG RISK VULN
   Almeida A. C., 2009, 1 WORLD IMACS MODSIM
   Almeida AC, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P1730, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.008
   [Anonymous], 45 AUSTR CTR INT AGR
   [Anonymous], 1981, Eucalypts for planting
   [Anonymous], 2011, Opportunities for Carbon Forestry in Australia: Economic Assessment and Constraints to Implementation
   [Anonymous], POT EFF CLIM CHANG F
   [Anonymous], 2010, Climate variability and change in south-eastern Australia: A synthesis of findings from Phase 1 of the South Eastern Australian Climate Initiative SEACI
   ArborGen, 2010, FREEZ TOL EUC
   Barker DH, 2005, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V28, P1506, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01387.x
   Barton CVM, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P585, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02526.x
   Barton CVM, 2010, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V150, P941, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.03.001
   Bassa A. G., 2011, P IUFRO C IMPR CULT, P82
   Battaglia M, 2004, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V193, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.033
   Battaglia M., 2009, Climate Change and Australias plantation estate
   Boden T., 2011, Record high 2010 global carbon dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel combustion and cement manufacture posted on CDIAC site
   Boland D.J., 1984, Forest Trees of Australia
   Booth TH, 2010, ADAPTING AGRICULTURE TO CLIMATE CHANGE: PREPARING AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES FOR THE FUTURE, P137
   Booth T. H., 1996, ACIAR P, V63
   Booth T. H., 2009, CLIMATE CHANGE 2009
   BOOTH TH, 1988, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V23, P47, DOI 10.1016/0378-1127(88)90013-8
   BOOTH TH, 1991, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V43, P47, DOI 10.1016/0378-1127(91)90075-7
   BOOTH TH, 1985, COMMONW FOREST REV, V64, P241
   Busby J. R., 1991, Plant Protection Quarterly, V6, P8
   CAB International, 2005, FOR COMP CD
   Eldridge K., 1994, EUCALYPT DOMESTICATI
   Foster G., 2011, ENVIRON RES LETT, V6, P1
   GIT Consulting, 2009, EUC UN CULT EUC FOR
   Glen M, 2007, AUSTRALAS PLANT PATH, V36, P1, DOI 10.1071/AP06088
   Harwood C., 2011, Developing a eucalypt resource: learning from Australia and elsewhere: University of Canterbury, P43
   Hughes L, 1996, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V5, P23, DOI 10.2307/2997467
   Hutchinson G.E., 1965, ECOLOGICAL THEATRE E, P26
   HUTCHINSON GE, 1957, COLD SPRING HARB SYM, V22, P415, DOI 10.1101/SQB.1957.022.01.039
   HUTCHINSON MF, 1984, SOL ENERGY, V32, P277, DOI 10.1016/S0038-092X(84)80045-6
   IOCI, 2011, 2010 S DEP ENV CONS
   IOCI, 2009, OUR CLIM HAS CHANG
   Jovanovic T, 2000, NEW FOREST, V19, P215, DOI 10.1023/A:1006662718206
   Landsberg JJ, 1997, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V95, P209, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00026-1
   MCKENNEY DW, 1993, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V60, P59, DOI 10.1016/0378-1127(93)90023-G
   Mitchell T.D., 2004, A comprehensive set of climate scenarios for Europe and the globe
   NOAA, 2012, STAT CLIM GLOB AN 20
   Ogden AE, 2007, INT FOREST REV, V9, P713, DOI 10.1505/ifor.9.3.713
   Pinkard EA, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P839, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.027
   Poynton R.J., 1979, EUCALYPTS, V2
   Prtner H.O, 2022, Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, P3056, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844]
   Raison J., 2007, FEASIBILITY FOREST F
   Roden JS, 1999, AUST J PLANT PHYSIOL, V26, P37, DOI 10.1071/PP98134
   Rogelj J., 2011, NATURE CLIM CHANGE
   Seppala R., 2009, ADAPTATION PEOPLE FO
   Shroter D., 2004, GLOBAL CHANGE VULNER
   Spek Machteld., 2005, Financing Pulp Mills: An Appraisal of Risk Assessment and Safeguard Procedures
   Turnbull JW, 1999, NEW FOREST, V17, P37, DOI 10.1023/A:1006524911242
   van Bueren M., 2004, 30 AUSTR CTR INT AGR
NR 55
TC 172
Z9 188
U1 3
U2 109
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0378-1127
EI 1872-7042
J9 FOREST ECOL MANAG
JI For. Ecol. Manage.
PD AUG 1
PY 2013
VL 301
SI SI
BP 28
EP 34
DI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.004
PG 7
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA 165LI
UT WOS:000320485000003
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU García-Valero, A
   Martínez-Martínez, S
   Faz, A
   Terrero, MA
   Muñoz, MA
   Gómez-López, MD
   Acosta, JA
AF Garcia-Valero, Amalia
   Martinez-Martinez, Silvia
   Faz, Angel
   Angelica Terrero, Martire
   Angeles Munoz, Maria
   Dolores Gomez-Lopez, Maria
   Acosta, Jose A.
TI Treatment of WASTEWATER from the Tannery Industry in a Constructed
   Wetland Planted with <i>Phragmites australis</i>
SO AGRONOMY-BASEL
LA English
DT Article
DE constructed wetland; depuration process; hydraulic retention time;
   Phragmites australis; phytoextraction; pollutants; wastewater
ID BORON B REMOVAL; PILOT-SCALE; EUTROPHICATION ASSESSMENT; CHROMIUM
   REMOVAL; PERFORMANCE; PHOSPHORUS; NITROGEN; METALS; ACCUMULATION;
   OXIDATION
AB Constructed wetlands (CWs) can remove a high amount of pollutants from wastewater, and therefore play an important role in water purification. In this study, a pilot system to improve the traditional treatment of industrial wastewater from the tannery industry was tested. The main objective of this research was to remove nitrogen, phosphorus, boron, and chromium from a tannery's industrial wastewater using a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland (HSSFCW) formed from three cells, planted with Phragmites australis and operated in batch mode as an ecofriendly system. P. australis was selected due to its ability to adapt to climatic conditions, its wetland and management characteristics, and its high capacity for pollutant absorption. The concentrations of total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), total phosphorus (TP), boron (B), and chromium (Cr) were analyzed in both wastewater and purified water, and the removal efficiencies were calculated. In addition, both the absorption capacity of P. australis in the aerial and root parts and the adsorption capacity of substrates (gravel and washed sand) were analyzed. Results showed that the concentrations of TP and Cr decreased in the wastewater at both hydraulic retention times (HRTs) tested (3 and 7 days), with 3 days being the most effective, showing removal efficiency values of 78% and 48% for TP and Cr, respectively. However, concentrations of TKN and B were not statistically reduced at either HRTs. Regarding the absorption capacity of P. australis, the highest absorption efficiencies for TKN and TP were reported at 7 days in the aerial part of the plants. In contrast, B was retained in roots at HRT of 3 days. Finally, Cr was more significantly absorbed at 3 days by P. australis. Moreover, the substrates also played important roles in the adsorption of nitrogen and boron. Therefore, CWs planted with P. australis could be used as an ecofriendly technique to the reduce pollution load of the wastewater from tannery industry, especially for P and Cr, although in order to increase the removal efficiency of B and N, the combination with other plant species and different retention times should be tested.
C1 [Garcia-Valero, Amalia; Martinez-Martinez, Silvia; Faz, Angel; Angelica Terrero, Martire; Angeles Munoz, Maria; Dolores Gomez-Lopez, Maria; Acosta, Jose A.] Univ Politecn Cartagena, Management & Reclamat Soil & Water Res Grp, Sustainable Use, Paseo Alfonso XIII 48, Cartagena 30203, Spain.
C3 Universidad Politecnica de Cartagena
RP García-Valero, A (corresponding author), Univ Politecn Cartagena, Management & Reclamat Soil & Water Res Grp, Sustainable Use, Paseo Alfonso XIII 48, Cartagena 30203, Spain.
EM amalia.garcia@upct.es; smartinez@upct.es; afaz@upct.es;
   aterrero@upct.es; cons_angeles24@gmail.com; mdgomez@upct.es;
   jacosta@upct.es
RI Acosta, Jose/K-8036-2017; Gomez-Lopez, MD/L-7979-2014
OI Martinez Martinez, Silvia/0000-0001-7041-3298; Munoz, M
   Angeles/0000-0001-6128-1369; Gomez-Lopez, MD/0000-0001-8204-2914
FU AGUAS DE LORCA S.A. [4497/16CTA]
FX This research was funded by AGUAS DE LORCA S.A. grant number 4497/16CTA.
CR Allende KL, 2012, CHEM ENG J, V179, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2011.10.069
   Babiker E, 2019, J ENVIRON CHEM ENG, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.jece.2019.102948
   Bakhshoodeh R, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V24, P23803, DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-0002-6
   Bolton L, 2019, ECOL ENG, V142, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoena.2019.100005
   Caballero-Lajarín A, 2015, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V226, DOI 10.1007/s11270-015-2606-0
   Calheiros CSC, 2008, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V99, P6866, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.043
   Calheiros CSC, 2012, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V95, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.003
   Cosme N, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V73, P676, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.026
   Crudu M, 2014, WASTE MANAGE, V34, P1806, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.12.015
   Di Luca GA, 2017, ECOL ENG, V108, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.08.038
   Dotro G, 2012, J HAZARD MATER, V239, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.08.050
   Gao Y, 2017, WATER RES, V108, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.033
   Gerek EE, 2019, J WATER PROCESS ENG, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.03.007
   Gill LW, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V601, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.182
   Goh PS, 2018, DESALINATION, V434, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2017.07.023
   Healy MG, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P2348, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.021
   Huang J, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V159, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.008
   Irwin NB, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V206, P1063, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.050
   Kamal AKI, 2016, ENVIRON PROCESS, V3, P179, DOI 10.1007/s40710-016-0123-9
   Kizito S, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V592, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.125
   Kokkinos E, 2019, J ENVIRON CHEM ENG, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103307
   Lavrnic S, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V702, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134795
   Liang YX, 2017, ECOL ENG, V98, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.11.005
   Lipps W C., 2018, Standard Methods Committee of the American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, DOI [DOI 10.2105/AJPH.51.6.940-A, 10.2105/SMWW.2882.023, DOI 10.2105/SMWW.2882.023]
   Liu XL, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V635, P1360, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.260
   Lu SB, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V127, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.166
   Mandal T, 2010, J HAZARD MATER, V180, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.014
   Mant C, 2006, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V97, P1767, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.09.010
   McIver R, 2019, MAR ENVIRON RES, V144, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.11.013
   Mohammed K, 2019, SCI AFR, V4, DOI 10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00096
   Mulkeen CJ, 2017, ECOL ENG, V107, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.07.007
   Muñoz MA, 2016, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V227, DOI 10.1007/s11270-016-2993-x
   Nazer DW, 2006, J CLEAN PROD, V14, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.04.002
   Nguyen TTN, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V653, P370, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.319
   Papaevangelou VA, 2017, CHEMOSPHERE, V168, P716, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.002
   Raper E, 2018, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V118, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.035
   Ricart S, 2019, AGR WATER MANAGE, V217, P426, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.017
   Risser J.A., 1990, TESTING SOILS TOXIC
   Saeed T, 2012, CHEMOSPHERE, V88, P1065, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.055
   Saggaï MM, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V201, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.040
   Salgot M., 2018, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V118, P178
   Sehar S, 2015, ECOL ENG, V81, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.009
   Steidl J, 2019, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V283, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2019.106577
   Sultana MY, 2014, INT BIODETER BIODEGR, V96, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.08.009
   Swain AK, 2018, J WATER PROCESS ENG, V23, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.02.017
   Türker OC, 2017, ECOL ENG, V102, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.02.034
   Türker OC, 2017, J HAZARD MATER, V324, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.10.044
   Türker OC, 2016, ECOL ENG, V88, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.12.021
   Türker OC, 2014, ECOL ENG, V64, P350, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.01.007
   Venturi S, 2015, APPL GEOCHEM, V63, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.08.008
   Vignati DAL, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V653, P401, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.259
   Vymazal J., 2004, BIOGEOCHEMICAL INVES, P657, DOI [10.1023/B:WAFO.0000028385.63075.51, DOI 10.1023/B:WAFO.0000028385.63075.51, 10.1007/978-94-007-0952, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0952]
   Vymazal J, 2007, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V380, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.09.014
   Vymazal J, 2016, CHEM ENG J, V290, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.108
   Wang FT, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V145, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.017
   Watanabe F.S., 1965, TEST ASCORBIC ACID M
   Ye ZH, 2003, CHEMOSPHERE, V52, P1571, DOI 10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00497-1
   Yildirim K, 2018, CHEMOSPHERE, V194, P722, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.036
   Zhang S, 2018, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V104, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2018.02.011
   Zhang WQ, 2017, J ENVIRON SCI, V55, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.jes.2016.07.004
   Zhu H, 2017, J HAZARD MATER, V333, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.03.041
   Zhuang LL, 2019, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V293, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122086
   Zou DA, 2013, CHEMOSPHERE, V93, P1413, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.07.009
NR 63
TC 24
Z9 26
U1 4
U2 34
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4395
J9 AGRONOMY-BASEL
JI Agronomy-Basel
PD FEB
PY 2020
VL 10
IS 2
AR 176
DI 10.3390/agronomy10020176
PG 15
WC Agronomy; Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Plant Sciences
GA KW7LO
UT WOS:000521366400064
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Hundhausen, M
   Feldmann, H
   Kohlhepp, R
   Pinto, JG
AF Hundhausen, Marie
   Feldmann, Hendrik
   Kohlhepp, Regina
   Pinto, Joaquim G.
TI Climate change signals of extreme precipitation return levels for
   Germany in a transient convection-permitting simulation ensemble
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE convection-permitting; COSMO-CLM; extreme precipitation; multi-model
   ensemble; regional climate modelling
ID EXCEPTIONAL FLOOD EVENT; MULTIDISCIPLINARY ANALYSIS; CENTRAL-EUROPE;
   FUTURE CHANGES; JULY 2021; SENSITIVITY; BLOCKING; IMPACTS; MODELS
AB The increase in extreme precipitation with global warming (GW) and associated uncertainties are major challenges for climate adaptation. To project future extreme precipitation on different time and intensity scales (return periods [RPs] from 1 to 100 a and durations from 1 h to 3 days), we use a novel convection-permitting (CP), multi-global climate model ensemble of COSMO-CLM regional simulations with a transient projection time (1971-2100) over Germany. We find an added value of the CP scale (2.8 km) with respect to the representation of hourly extreme precipitation intensities compared to the coarser scale with parametrized deep convection (7 km). In general, the return levels (RLs) calculated from the CP simulations are in better agreement with those of the conventional observation-based risk products for the region for short event durations than for longer durations, where an overestimation by the simulation-based results was found. A maximum climate change signal of 6-8.5% increase per degree of GW is projected within the CP ensemble, with the largest changes expected for short durations and long RPs. Analysis of the uncertainty in the climate change signal shows a substantial residual standard deviation of a linear approximation, highlighting the need for transient data sets instead of time-slice experiments to increase confidence in the estimates. Furthermore, the ensemble spread is found to be smallest for intensities of short duration, where changes are expected to be based mainly on thermodynamic contributions. The ensemble spread is larger for long, multi-day durations, where a stronger dependence on the dynamical component is ascribed. In addition, an increase in spatial variance of the RLs with GW implies a more variable future climate and points to an increasing importance of accounting for uncertainties.
   Extreme precipitation return levels for Germany, projected from a convection-permitting climate ensemble, increase by up to 6-8.5% per degree of global warming, with the largest changes for short event durations (EDs) and long return periods. Sensitivity analyses associate the highest uncertainties with long EDs and emphasize the importance of transient data sets. image
C1 [Hundhausen, Marie; Feldmann, Hendrik; Kohlhepp, Regina; Pinto, Joaquim G.] Karlsruhe Inst Technol KIT, Inst Meteorol & Climate Res Troposphere Res IMKTRO, Karlsruhe, Germany.
C3 Helmholtz Association; Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
RP Hundhausen, M (corresponding author), Karlsruhe Inst Technol KIT, Inst Meteorol & Climate Res Troposphere Res IMKTRO, Karlsruhe, Germany.
EM marie.hundhausen@kit.edu
RI Feldmann, Hendrik/A-8427-2019; Pinto, Joaquim G./A-7352-2009
OI Feldmann, Hendrik/0000-0001-6987-7351; Pinto, Joaquim
   G./0000-0002-8865-1769; Hundhausen, Marie/0000-0001-5400-3088
FU German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01LR2002B,
   01LP1901A]; AXA Research Fund;  [01LR2007B]
FX German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Grant/Award
   Numbers: 01LR2007B, 01LR2002B, 01LP1901A; AXA Research Fund
CR Baldauf M, 2011, MON WEATHER REV, V139, P3887, DOI 10.1175/MWR-D-10-05013.1
   Ban N, 2021, CLIM DYNAM, V57, P275, DOI 10.1007/s00382-021-05708-w
   Ban NI, 2020, CLIM DYNAM, V55, P61, DOI 10.1007/s00382-018-4339-4
   Ban N, 2015, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V42, P1165, DOI 10.1002/2014GL062588
   Ban N, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V119, DOI 10.1002/2014JD021478
   Berg P, 2013, ATMOS RES, V119, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.05.012
   Berg P, 2019, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V19, P957, DOI 10.5194/nhess-19-957-2019
   Chan SC, 2016, NAT GEOSCI, V9, P24, DOI [10.1038/NGEO2596, 10.1038/ngeo2596]
   Chan SC, 2014, J CLIMATE, V27, P6155, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00723.1
   DWA, 2012, Starkregen in Abhngigkeit von Wiederkehrzeit und Dauer, P531
   DWD, 2023, HOURL STAT OBS PREC
   Eggert B, 2015, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V15, P5957, DOI 10.5194/acp-15-5957-2015
   Ettrichratz V., 2023, EGUSPHERE, V2023, P1
   Fosser G, 2015, CLIM DYNAM, V44, P45, DOI 10.1007/s00382-014-2242-1
   Fowler HJ, 2021, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V2, P107, DOI 10.1038/s43017-020-00128-6
   Gao P., 2022, Short, disclose, and distort
   Guerreiro SB, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P803, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0245-3
   Helsen S, 2020, CLIM DYNAM, V54, P1267, DOI 10.1007/s00382-019-05056-w
   Henn B, 2018, J HYDROL, V556, P1205, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.008
   Ho CK, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P21, DOI 10.1175/2011BAMS3110.1
   Hodnebrog O, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab549c
   Hohenegger C, 2008, METEOROL Z, V17, P383, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0303
   Hundhausen M, 2023, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V23, P2873, DOI 10.5194/nhess-23-2873-2023
   Junghanel T., KOSTRA DWD 2010R  BE
   Kaspar F, 2013, ADV SCI RES, V10, P99, DOI 10.5194/asr-10-99-2013
   Kautz LA, 2022, WEATHER CLIM DYNAM, V3, P305, DOI 10.5194/wcd-3-305-2022
   Kendon EJ, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P570, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2258, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2258]
   Kendon EJ, 2012, J CLIMATE, V25, P5791, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00562.1
   Kendon EJ, 2023, NAT COMMUN, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-36499-9
   Kreienkamp F., 2021, World Weather Atribution
   Lehmann J, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V132, P501, DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1434-y
   Lenderink G, 2008, NAT GEOSCI, V1, P511, DOI 10.1038/ngeo262
   Lenderink G, 2021, PHILOS T R SOC A, V379, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2019.0544
   Lenderink G, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab214a
   Lengfeld K, 2019, METEOROL Z, V28, P363, DOI 10.1127/metz/2019/0964
   Li C, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P6885, DOI 10.1029/2019GL082908
   Lucas-Picher P, 2021, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V12, DOI 10.1002/wcc.731
   Ludwig P, 2023, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V23, P1287, DOI 10.5194/nhess-23-1287-2023
   MALITZ G., 2015, KOSTRA-DWD-2010. Starkniederschlags - hohen fur Deutschland (Bezugszeitraum 1951 - 2010). Abschlussbericht
   Masson-Delmotte V, 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE 2021, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009157896
   Michaelis AC, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P6905, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0697.1
   Mishra V, 2012, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V39, DOI 10.1029/2012GL052790
   Mohr S, 2023, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V23, P525, DOI 10.5194/nhess-23-525-2023
   Nijsse FJMM, 2020, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V11, P737, DOI 10.5194/esd-11-737-2020
   Pendergrass AG, 2018, SCIENCE, V360, P1072, DOI 10.1126/science.aat1871
   Pfahl S, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P423, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3287, 10.1038/nclimate3287]
   Poschlod B, 2021, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V13, P983, DOI 10.5194/essd-13-983-2021
   Prein AF, 2013, CLIM DYNAM, V41, P2655, DOI 10.1007/s00382-013-1744-6
   Rajczak J, 2017, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V122, P10773, DOI 10.1002/2017JD027176
   Rauthe M, 2013, METEOROL Z, V22, P235, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0436
   Rockel B, 2008, METEOROL Z, V17, P347, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0309
   Santos JA, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V121, P1170, DOI 10.1002/2015JD024399
   Sato T, 2009, J CLIMATE, V22, P4809, DOI 10.1175/2009JCLI2890.1
   Schiemann R, 2020, WEATHER CLIM DYNAM, V1, P277, DOI 10.5194/wcd-1-277-2020
   Seneviratne SI, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001474
   Sieck LC, 2007, WATER RESOUR RES, V43, DOI 10.1029/2005WR004519
   Sorland SL, 2021, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V14, P5125, DOI 10.5194/gmd-14-5125-2021
   Taylor K.E., 2011, CMIP5 Data Reference Syntax (DRS) and Controlled Vocabularies
   Teichmann C, 2018, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/atmos9040115
   TIEDTKE M, 1989, MON WEATHER REV, V117, P1779, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1779:ACMFSF>2.0.CO;2
   UK Environment Agency, 2012, GUID FLOOD RISK ASS
   Westra S, 2014, REV GEOPHYS, V52, P522, DOI 10.1002/2014RG000464
   Westra S, 2013, J CLIMATE, V26, P3904, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00502.1
NR 63
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 5
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0899-8418
EI 1097-0088
J9 INT J CLIMATOL
JI Int. J. Climatol.
PD APR
PY 2024
VL 44
IS 5
BP 1454
EP 1471
DI 10.1002/joc.8393
EA FEB 2024
PG 18
WC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA NO5W2
UT WOS:001167433600001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Rubio-Martin, A
   Llario, F
   Garcia-Prats, A
   Macian-Sorribes, H
   Macian, J
   Pulido-Velazquez, M
AF Rubio-Martin, Adria
   Llario, Ferran
   Garcia-Prats, Alberto
   Macian-Sorribes, Hector
   Macian, Javier
   Pulido-Velazquez, Manuel
TI Climate services for water utilities: Lessons learnt from the case of
   the urban water supply to Valencia, Spain
SO CLIMATE SERVICES
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate services; Vulnerability assessment; Climate adaptation; Water
   utility; Climate projections; Water supply; Mediterranean water
   resources; Resilient cities
ID DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; CYANOBACTERIAL BLOOMS; LAND-USE; QUALITY; LAKE;
   TEMPERATURES; RESOURCES; RESERVOIR; NITROGEN; IMPACTS
AB Climate change projections in many regions of the world show a critical reduction in precipitation and a sig-nificant rise in temperatures in the next decades. This change may affect the operation of water utilities in arid and semi-arid parts of the globe. The Mediterranean region is particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change on water resources. In this paper, we reflect on the challenges that the water utility sector may experience during the upcoming decades to continue providing its essential service under the new climate scenario. Our reasoning is based on the lessons learned during the co-creation of a climate service with the water utility company of Valencia (Spain) within the framework of the EU ERA4CS project INNOVA. The joint vision of climate, water management researchers and water utility operators resulted in a multi-scale framework for evaluating the vulnerability of the water utility to climate change. The modelling framework couples water quantity and quality and their interaction in a chain of models. The proposed framework forced all parties to consider the issue of the temporal and spatial scales, and the importance of choosing and defining the boundaries of the problem. The analytical framework has three distinct elements: (1) a combination of climate projections; (2) hydrological and water resource management model of the river basin system; (3) reservoir management and water quality model. Two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5 were considered in two timeframes for the analysis: the short term (2020-2040) and the medium term (2041-2069). The results show a significant reduction in water availability combined with an increased frequency and intensity of phytoplankton blooms and anoxia episodes. These changes result in the deterioration of the reservoir trophic state, shifting from ultraoligotrophic-oligotrophic (control period) to oligotrophic-mesotrophic (RCP 8.5). The example shows how the combination of models on different scales and the involvement of experts in the co-creation process can result in a customized climate service that provides valuable information to water utility operators that can be used to reduce the system's vulnerability to climate change.
C1 [Rubio-Martin, Adria; Llario, Ferran; Garcia-Prats, Alberto; Macian-Sorribes, Hector; Pulido-Velazquez, Manuel] Univ Politecn Valencia UPV, Res Inst Water & Environm Engn IIAMA, Cami Vera S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain.
   [Macian, Javier] Empresa Mixta Valenciana Aguas S A Global Omnium S, Gran via Marques Turia 19, Valencia 46005, Spain.
C3 Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
RP Rubio-Martin, A (corresponding author), Univ Politecn Valencia UPV, Res Inst Water & Environm Engn IIAMA, Cami Vera S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain.
EM adrumar@upv.es
RI Garcia-Prats, Alberto/K-9228-2017; Pulido-Velazquez, Manuel/N-1619-2014;
   Rubio-Martin, Adria/KFQ-7411-2024; Macian-Sorribes, Hector/Z-5540-2019
OI Garcia-Prats, Alberto/0000-0001-5605-8349
FU INNOVA; ADAPTAMED; SAPIDES; WATER4CAST; European Research Area for
   Climate Services Consortium (ER4CS); Agencia Estatal de Investigacion of
   the Spanish government [GA: 690462, PCIN-2017-066]; Ministerio de
   Ciencia e Innovacion of Spain [RTI2018-101483-B-I00]; EU FEDER funds;
   Agencia Valenciana de la Innovacio (AVI) [INNEST/2021/276]; Generalitat
   Valenciana through the Conselleria de Innovacion, Universidades, Ciencia
   y Sociedad Digital [PROMETEO/2021/074]
FX This research was supported by the INNOVA, ADAPTAMED, SAPIDES, and
   WATER4CAST projects. The Innovation of Climate Services (INNOVA) project
   is funded by the European Research Area for Climate Services Consortium
   (ER4CS) and the Agencia Estatal de Investigacion of the Spanish
   government (GA: 690462; PCIN-2017-066). The ADAP-TAMED project is funded
   by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion of Spain
   (RTI2018-101483-B-I00), including EU FEDER funds. SAPIDES
   (INNEST/2021/276) is funded by the Agencia Valenciana de la Innovacio
   (AVI). Lastly, WATER4CAST (PROMETEO/2021/074) is funded by the
   Generalitat Valenciana through the Conselleria de Innovacion,
   Universidades, Ciencia y Sociedad Digital.
CR Amblar M.P., 2017, GUIA ESCENARIOS REGI, VFirst
   Andreu J, 1996, J HYDROL, V177, P269, DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(95)02963-X
   [Anonymous], 2020, LANCET, V396, P1129, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32131-0
   [Anonymous], 2019, CONFEDERACION HIDROG
   [Anonymous], 2011, Guidelines for drinking-water quality: incorporating 1st and 2nd addenda, V1, P104
   Baron JS, 2013, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V114, P71, DOI 10.1007/s10533-012-9788-y
   Beutel M, 2020, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V847, P4425, DOI 10.1007/s10750-020-04192-3
   Brasil J, 2016, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V770, P145, DOI 10.1007/s10750-015-2578-5
   Bremer S, 2019, CLIM SERV, V13, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2019.01.003
   Caissie D, 2006, FRESHWATER BIOL, V51, P1389, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01597.x
   Cantin A, 2011, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V68, P260, DOI 10.1139/F10-138
   Cha Y, 2017, WATER RES, V124, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.040
   Charlton MB, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V613, P1510, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.218
   CHJ, 2022, PLAN HIDR DEM HIDR J
   Clercin NA, 2019, WATER RESOUR RES, V55, P5413, DOI 10.1029/2018WR023651
   Couture RM, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V621, P713, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.303
   Danilenko A., 2010, 24 WORLD BANK
   Delpla I, 2009, ENVIRON INT, V35, P1225, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2009.07.001
   European Commission, 2015, ROADM CLIM SERV EUR
   Fink G, 2016, J HYDROL, V540, P457, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.023
   Fonseca BM, 2008, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V600, P267, DOI 10.1007/s10750-007-9240-9
   Gelda RK, 2019, J HYDROMETEOROL, V20, P1197, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-18-0213.1
   Gibbs M.M., 2018, LAKE RESTORATION HDB, P165, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-93043-5_6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-93043-5_6]
   Giorgi F, 2006, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V33, DOI 10.1029/2006GL025734
   Hayakawa A, 2015, CATENA, V133, P486, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2015.04.009
   Herrera S, 2012, INT J CLIMATOL, V32, P74, DOI 10.1002/joc.2256
   Lee W, 2006, WATER RES, V40, P3767, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2006.08.008
   Leite Jéssica Nayara de Carvalho, 2019, Acta Limnol. Bras., V31, pe15, DOI 10.1590/s2179-975x6918
   Li ZG, 2019, WATER RES, V157, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.072
   Lins RPM, 2016, BRAZ J BOT, V39, P583, DOI 10.1007/s40415-016-0267-x
   Lipczynska-Kochany E, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V640, P1548, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.376
   Macian-Sorribes H, 2017, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V143, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000712, 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000712]
   Marcos-Garcia P, 2017, J HYDROL, V554, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.028
   Marcos-Garcia P, 2017, ING AGUA, V21, P35, DOI 10.4995/Ia.2017.6361
   Mirchi A, 2012, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V26, P2421, DOI 10.1007/s11269-012-0024-2
   Mohseni O, 1999, WATER RESOUR RES, V35, P3723, DOI 10.1029/1999WR900193
   Momblanch A, 2014, J HYDROL, V519, P3369, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.002
   Moss B, 2011, INLAND WATERS, V1, P101, DOI 10.5268/IW-1.2.359
   Nazari-Sharabian M, 2018, ENG TECHNOL APPL SCI, V8, P3668
   Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 1982, LIST SOC IND
   Pachauri RK, 2014, 2014 IEEE STUDENTS' CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE (SCEECS)
   Paredes J, 2010, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V408, P2576, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.037
   Paredes-Arquiola J., 2013, MODELO GESCAL SIMULA
   Páscoa P, 2017, ADV METEOROL, V2017, DOI 10.1155/2017/4653126
   Rolland DC, 2013, J PLANKTON RES, V35, P744, DOI 10.1093/plankt/fbt042
   Rubio-Martin A, 2021, EARTHS FUTURE, V9, DOI 10.1029/2021EF002181
   Rubio-Martin A, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12051407
   Schwefel R, 2016, WATER RESOUR RES, V52, P8794, DOI 10.1002/2016WR019194
   Sebastiá MT, 2013, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V78, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.03.012
   Serpa D, 2017, ENVIRON POLLUT, V224, P454, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.026
   Sharma S, 2017, APPL WATER SCI, V7, P1043, DOI 10.1007/s13201-016-0455-7
   Suhari M, 2022, CLIM SERV, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100282
   Swart R, 2021, CLIM SERV, V22, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100227
   Temez J.R., 1977, Modelo Matematico de Trasformacion 'Precipitacion- Escorrentia.'
   Tzanakakis VA, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12092347
   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2010, EPA800R10001
   UN, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203
   United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2021, AD STRAT GUID WAT UT
   Vogel Jason, 2016, Climate Services, V2-3, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2016.06.003
   Wang HQ, 2018, ENVIRON CHEM LETT, V16, P265, DOI 10.1007/s10311-017-0657-8
   Ward NK, 2020, WATER RESOUR RES, V56, DOI 10.1029/2020WR027296
   Watanabe F, 2016, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V2, DOI 10.1007/s40808-016-0193-8
   Willmott CJ, 2012, INT J CLIMATOL, V32, P2088, DOI 10.1002/joc.2419
   Winder M, 2012, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V698, P5, DOI 10.1007/s10750-012-1149-2
   Woolway RI, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V155, P81, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02465-y
   Zittis G, 2019, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V19, P2621, DOI 10.1007/s10113-019-01565-w
NR 66
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 1
U2 13
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2405-8807
J9 CLIM SERV
JI Clim. Serv.
PD JAN
PY 2023
VL 29
AR 100338
DI 10.1016/j.cliser.2022.100338
EA DEC 2022
PG 13
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA 7M6HC
UT WOS:000906755200001
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sun, B
   Zhao, LL
   Shao, F
   Lu, ZC
   Tian, JS
   Liu, CD
AF Sun, Bin
   Zhao, Linlin
   Shao, Fei
   Lu, Zhichuang
   Tian, Jiashen
   Liu, Changdong
TI Estimating the impacts of climate change on the habitat suitability of
   common minke whales integrating local adaptation
SO FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE balaenoptera acutorostrata; climate change; species distribution models;
   habitat suitability; local adaptation
ID BALAENOPTERA-ACUTOROSTRATA; PROTECTED AREAS; MARINE MAMMALS; MORAY
   FIRTH; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM; PATTERNS; OCEAN
AB Climate change is exerting unprecedented effects on the habitats of marine mammals. Common minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) have suffered immense harm from commercial whaling, and the recovery of this species is likely threatened by climate change. To better manage and conserve this species, it is important to predict its current habitat distribution and the potential change under future climate change scenarios. Such predictions are typically generated by species distribution models (SDMs), which construct a correlation between species occurrence data and its habitat environmental variables. SDMs are commonly constructed at the species level, assuming a homogenous response of the species to climatic variables across their entire geographic range. Spatially segregated populations from the same species inhabit distinct environments and gradually adapt to the local conditions, resulting in niche differentiation among populations. Species-level SDMs that ignore the effects of local adaptation mask differences in population responses to climate change and might present an unrealistic picture of potential species distributions. Based on morphological and genetic evidence, the common minke whale was divided into three populations: the North Atlantic population (NAP), Southern Hemisphere population (SHP) and North Pacific population (NPP); these populations inhabit isolated geographic areas with distinct environmental conditions. We quantified the realized niches of these populations and found evidence of significant ecological niche differentiation. We then constructed SDMs at the species and population levels and compared the predictions from these two types of models under different climate change scenarios. Both types of models projected similar change trends in species range, with a contraction of future suitable habitats for the NAP and SHP and an expansion for the NPP. However, the magnitudes of this change differed; the population-level model projected more optimistic results for the SHP and NAP, indicating less habitat loss. This study highlighted the importance of considering local adaptation when estimating the impact of climate change on species habitat suitability. These spatiotemporal predictions provide essential knowledge for designing climate-adaptive conservation and management strategies, such as the delimitation of mobile marine protected areas (MPAs).
C1 [Sun, Bin; Liu, Changdong] Ocean Univ China, Dept Fisheries, Qingdao, Peoples R China.
   [Zhao, Linlin] Minist Nat Resources, Inst Oceanog 1, Qingdao, Peoples R China.
   [Shao, Fei] Shandong Prov Forestry Protect & Dev Serv Ctr, Dept Resource Protect, Jinan, Peoples R China.
   [Lu, Zhichuang; Tian, Jiashen] Liaoning Ocean & Fisheries Sci Res Inst, Dalian Key Lab Conservat Biol Endangered Marine Ma, Dalian, Peoples R China.
C3 Ocean University of China; Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's
   Republic of China; First Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural
   Resources
RP Liu, CD (corresponding author), Ocean Univ China, Dept Fisheries, Qingdao, Peoples R China.
EM changdong@ouc.edu.cn
RI Tian, Jiashen/ABE-7636-2021
FU National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFD0901205]
FX We are grateful to the data provider of the Global Biodiversity
   Information Facility (GBIF), Ocean Biogeographic Information System
   (OBIS) and Bio-ORACLE v2.1 datasets. This work was funded by the
   National Key R & D Program of China (2020YFD0901205).
CR Abe H, 2021, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V210, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105744
   Aiello-Lammens ME, 2015, ECOGRAPHY, V38, P541, DOI 10.1111/ecog.01132
   Allouche O, 2006, J APPL ECOL, V43, P1223, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x
   [Anonymous], 2017, Habitat Suitability and Distribution Models with Applications in R, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781139028271.010
   Araújo MB, 2012, ECOLOGY, V93, P1527, DOI 10.1890/11-1930.1
   Assis J, 2018, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V27, P277, DOI 10.1111/geb.12693
   Basher Z., 2018, World Wide Web Electronic Publication
   Benson SR, 2002, PROG OCEANOGR, V54, P279, DOI 10.1016/S0079-6611(02)00054-X
   Blonder B., 2021, **DATA OBJECT**
   Bowen WD, 1997, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V158, P267, DOI 10.3354/meps158267
   Breitburg D, 2018, SCIENCE, V359, P46, DOI 10.1126/science.aam7240
   Broennimann O., 2021, ECOSPAT SPATIAL ECOL
   Brower AA, 2018, POLAR BIOL, V41, P1033, DOI 10.1007/s00300-018-2257-x
   Bruno JF, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P499, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0149-2
   Cardoso P., 2021, BAT BIODIVERSITY ASS
   Cartagena-Matos B, 2021, MAMMAL REV, V51, P436, DOI 10.1111/mam.12238
   Carvalho JC, 2020, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2020.00243
   Chardon NI, 2020, ECOGRAPHY, V43, P60, DOI 10.1111/ecog.04630
   Chen YL, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107799
   Cheung WWL, 2013, NATURE, V497, P365, DOI 10.1038/nature12156
   Davies TE, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-08758-5
   de Boer MN, 2010, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V408, P265, DOI 10.3354/meps08598
   DeMarche ML, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P775, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14562
   Dormann CF, 2007, BASIC APPL ECOL, V8, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2006.11.001
   Dormann CF, 2013, ECOGRAPHY, V36, P27, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
   Edwards M, 2021, COMMUN BIOL, V4, DOI 10.1038/s42003-021-02159-1
   Flores H, 2012, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V458, P1, DOI 10.3354/meps09831
   Fossheim M, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P673, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2647
   Franklin J, 2010, Mapping species distributions, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511810602, 10.1017/CBO9780511810602]
   Fu JB, 2021, PEERJ, V9, DOI 10.7717/peerj.12001
   Glover KA, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0015197
   Hällfors MH, 2016, ECOL APPL, V26, P1154, DOI 10.1890/15-0926
   Hastings RA, 2020, CURR BIOL, V30, P1572, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2020.02.043
   Heide-Jorgensen MP, 2020, ECOL EVOL, V10, P8073, DOI 10.1002/ece3.6464
   Hunt TN, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-69863-6
   Ikeda DH, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P164, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13470
   Iturbide M., 2017, **DATA OBJECT**
   IWC (International Whaling Commision), 2021, POP STAT
   Kavanagh A. S., 2018, Marine Biodiversity Records, V11, P22, DOI 10.1186/s41200-018-0157-y
   Kishida T, 2017, MAR MAMMAL SCI, V33, P645, DOI 10.1111/mms.12369
   Kiszka JJ, 2015, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V523, P267, DOI 10.3354/meps11180
   Kramer-Schadt S, 2013, DIVERS DISTRIB, V19, P1366, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12096
   Le S, 2008, J STAT SOFTW, V25, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v025.i01
   Lecocq T, 2016, CONSERV LETT, V9, P281, DOI 10.1111/conl.12215
   Lee D, 2017, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V143, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr2.2017.06.005
   Liu CR, 2013, J BIOGEOGR, V40, P778, DOI 10.1111/jbi.12058
   Liu MM, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V822, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153651
   Lumpkin R, 2020, B AM METEOROL SOC, V101, pS135
   Luo Mei, 2017, Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao, V28, P4001, DOI 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201712.011
   Mammola S, 2020, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V11, P986, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.13424
   Maxwell SM, 2020, SCIENCE, V367, P252, DOI 10.1126/science.aaz9327
   Milmann L, 2021, POLAR BIOL, V44, P1575, DOI 10.1007/s00300-021-02897-2
   Milmann L, 2019, MAMMALIA, V83, P49, DOI 10.1515/mammalia-2017-0127
   Mitani Y, 2006, FISHERIES SCI, V72, P69, DOI 10.1111/j.1444-2906.2006.01118.x
   Moss RH, 2010, NATURE, V463, P747, DOI 10.1038/nature08823
   Murcia S, 2020, J APPL PHYCOL, V32, P2105, DOI 10.1007/s10811-020-02084-6
   Muzquiz-Villalobos M, 2018, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V208, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2018.05.002
   Oney B, 2013, ECOL EVOL, V3, P437, DOI 10.1002/ece3.426
   Park JY, 2015, BMC GENOMICS, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1213-1
   Pastene LA, 2007, MOL ECOL, V16, P1481, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03244.x
   Peñalver-Alcázar M, 2021, ZOOLOGY, V144, DOI 10.1016/j.zool.2020.125852
   Perrin WF, 2018, ENCYCLOPEDIA OF MARINE MAMMALS, 3RD EDITION, P608
   Piñones A, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P8580, DOI 10.1002/2016GL069656
   Ramirez-Flores O, 2019, AUST MAMMAL, V41, P231, DOI 10.1071/AM18015
   Razgour O, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P10418, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1820663116
   Rice DaleW., 1998, MARINE MAMMALS WORLD
   Risch D, 2019, FRONT MAR SCI, V6, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2019.00247
   Robinson Kevin P., 2009, Journal of Coastal Conservation, V13, P39, DOI 10.1007/s11852-009-0050-2
   Robinson NM, 2017, FRONT MAR SCI, V4, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2017.00421
   Roman J, 2014, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V12, P377, DOI 10.1890/130220
   Rosel Patricia E., 2016, Marine Biodiversity Records, V9, P63, DOI 10.1186/s41200-016-0058-x
   Salvadeo CJ, 2013, ARCH BIOL SCI, V65, P997, DOI 10.2298/ABS1303997S
   Schickele A, 2020, ECOL MODEL, V416, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108902
   Singer A, 2017, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V188, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.02.003
   Smith AB, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P4365, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13666
   Smith LV, 2013, J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL, V446, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jembe.2013.04.010
   SMITH RC, 1986, MAR BIOL, V91, P385, DOI 10.1007/BF00428633
   Song KJ, 2014, MAR BIOL RES, V10, P400, DOI 10.1080/17451000.2013.814787
   Soultan A, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac4ebe
   Tamura T, 2002, ICES J MAR SCI, V59, P516, DOI 10.1006/jmsc.2002.1199
   Tetley MJ, 2008, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V112, P3449, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2007.10.015
   Thuiller W., 2013, biomod2: ensemble platform for species distribution modeling
   Todd VLG, 2022, POLAR BIOL, V45, P113, DOI 10.1007/s00300-021-02977-3
   Tulloch VJD, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P1263, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14573
   Van Weelden C., 2021, CLIM CHANGE ECOL, V1
   Vikingsson GA, 2015, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V3, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2015.00006
   Wang Wei, 2021, Biodiversity Science, V29, P133, DOI 10.17520/biods.2020070
   Wang Zhen, 2020, Acta Theriologica Sinica, V40, P532, DOI 10.16829/j.slxb.150376
   Zhang ZX, 2021, DIVERS DISTRIB, V27, P684, DOI 10.1111/ddi.13225
   Zhang ZX, 2020, DIVERS DISTRIB, V26, P126, DOI 10.1111/ddi.13002
NR 90
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 6
U2 49
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-7745
J9 FRONT MAR SCI
JI Front. Mar. Sci.
PD AUG 9
PY 2022
VL 9
AR 923205
DI 10.3389/fmars.2022.923205
PG 16
WC Environmental Sciences; Marine & Freshwater Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Marine & Freshwater Biology
GA 3Y6BM
UT WOS:000843808600001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wu, Y
   Wang, DY
   Qiao, XJ
   Jiang, MX
   Li, QX
   Gu, ZR
   Liu, F
AF Wu, Yu
   Wang, Dongya
   Qiao, Xiujuan
   Jiang, Mingxi
   Li, Qianxi
   Gu, Zhirong
   Liu, Feng
TI Forest dynamics and carbon storage under climate change in a subtropical
   mountainous region in central China
SO ECOSPHERE
LA English
DT Article
DE aboveground biomass; climate warming; forest landscape model; forest
   management; LANDIS-II; soil organic carbon; species distribution;
   subtropical forest
ID LITTER DECOMPOSITION RATES; LANDSCAPE SIMULATION-MODEL;
   SPECIES-DIVERSITY; SOIL RESPIRATION; MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES; HABITAT
   FRAGMENTATION; CONIFEROUS FORESTS; ECOSYSTEM CARBON; EXTINCTION RISK;
   TREE DIVERSITY
AB Climate change has been observed to significantly influence forest growth, community composition, and species distribution ranges. These influences in turn will impose continuous impacts on forest production and carbon (C) storage potential. Forests in the subtropical China that are experiencing rapid regeneration and recovery may suffer multiple threats in the face of future climate change. Understanding how climate change may affect forest C sequestration and species dynamics over time will help formulate better management strategies for maintaining forest productivity and biodiversity. Here, we used a forest landscape model (LANDIS-II) to evaluate the long-term effects of current business-as-usual (BAU) management and climate projections (current, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5 climate scenarios; IPCC representative concentration pathways [RCPs] scenarios) on above- and belowground forest C storage and tree species dynamics in the Sangzhi County in the subtropical China. Our simulations showed a fast-growing period of forest total C in the first 70 yr, regardless of climate regime. Moderate climate change (RCP4.5 climate scenario) increased soil organic carbon (SOC) (12%) and detrital C (16%) but reduced live C (5%), contributing to a slight augment of 3% in forest C storage compared to the control climate, while severe climate change (RCP8.5 climate scenario) decreased SOC (16%), detrital C (27%), and live C (12%), resulting in a dramatic reduction of 14% in forest C storage, primarily because severe warming-induced water stress restrained species establishment and regeneration in temperature-sensitive areas like the lower elevations. Meanwhile, nature reserves in the higher elevations could act as "safe islands" by providing suitable conditions for most tree species, but the logging ban caused higher canopy closure, which in turn inhibit the growth and establishment of shade-intolerant species. The results also highlighted the positive responses of native "warm species" to climate warming and suggest that using them to replace some conventional coniferous plantation tree species would better mitigate the future climate change. Poor performance of the current BAU management in maintaining forest productivity and diversity suggests that new climate-adapted management strategies should be designed accordingly.
C1 [Wu, Yu; Wang, Dongya; Qiao, Xiujuan; Jiang, Mingxi; Li, Qianxi; Liu, Feng] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Aquat Bot & Watershed Ecol, Wuhan Bot Garden, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China.
   [Wu, Yu; Wang, Dongya; Li, Qianxi] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
   [Gu, Zhirong] Badagongshan Natl Nat Reserve, Sangzhi 416900, Hunan, Peoples R China.
C3 Chinese Academy of Sciences; Wuhan Botanical Garden, CAS; Chinese
   Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS
RP Liu, F (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Aquat Bot & Watershed Ecol, Wuhan Bot Garden, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China.
EM liufeng@wbgcas.cn
RI Wu, Yu/LUZ-1328-2024; Jiang, Mingxi/E-6344-2017; , Xiujuan/M-6966-2013;
   Liu, Feng/A-1410-2014
OI , Xiujuan/0000-0003-4647-399X; Liu, Feng/0000-0003-3383-7598
FU National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2014CB954004];
   National Natural Science Foundation of China [31700462, 31870465]
FX Funding was provided by the National Basic Research Program of China
   (973 Program) (2014CB954004) and the National Natural Science Foundation
   of China (31700462 and 31870465). We would like to thank Dr. David Bell
   and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on this
   manuscript.
CR Aerts R, 2006, J ECOL, V94, P713, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01142.x
   Aitken SN, 2008, EVOL APPL, V1, P95, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2007.00013.x
   Alexander LV, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P3
   Allen MR, 2000, NATURE, V407, P617, DOI 10.1038/35036559
   [Anonymous], 2018, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
   Ares A, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V260, P1104, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.023
   Beer C, 2010, SCIENCE, V329, P834, DOI 10.1126/science.1184984
   Bennie J, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P921, DOI 10.1111/ele.12129
   Biswas SR, 2010, ECOLOGY, V91, P28, DOI 10.1890/08-0887.1
   Boulanger Y, 2017, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V32, P1415, DOI 10.1007/s10980-016-0421-7
   Brienen RJW, 2015, NATURE, V519, P344, DOI 10.1038/nature14283
   Bronson DR, 2008, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V14, P856, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01508.x
   Busing RT, 2005, PLANT ECOL, V177, P177, DOI 10.1007/s11258-005-2322-8
   Busing RT, 2005, ECOLOGY, V86, P73, DOI 10.1890/04-0410
   Chen IC, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P1024, DOI 10.1126/science.1206432
   Chen LC, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V432, P656, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.09.059
   Choat B, 2012, NATURE, V491, P752, DOI 10.1038/nature11688
   Ciais P, 2005, NATURE, V437, P529, DOI 10.1038/nature03972
   Clark DA, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P5852, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0935903100
   Cornwell WK, 2008, ECOL LETT, V11, P1065, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x
   Creutzburg MK, 2017, ECOL APPL, V27, P503, DOI 10.1002/eap.1460
   Creutzburg MK, 2016, GCB BIOENERGY, V8, P357, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12255
   Cui GY, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0137452
   Da LJ, 2009, ECOL RES, V24, P1287, DOI 10.1007/s11284-009-0613-6
   Dai EF, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P3642, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13307
   Dale VH, 2001, BIOSCIENCE, V51, P723, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0723:CCAFD]2.0.CO;2
   DAVIS MB, 1989, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V15, P75, DOI 10.1007/BF00138846
   Delpierre N, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P1455, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01835.x
   Deng CH, 2019, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V138, P1899, DOI 10.1007/s00704-019-02886-w
   Dullinger S, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P619, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1514
   Duveneck MJ, 2015, ECOL APPL, V25, P1653, DOI 10.1890/14-0738.1
   Duveneck MJ, 2014, CAN J FOREST RES, V44, P700, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2013-0391
   Duveneck MJ, 2014, ECOSPHERE, V5, DOI 10.1890/ES13-00370.1
   Dymond CC, 2016, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V13, P1933, DOI 10.5194/bg-13-1933-2016
   ESRI, 2013, ESRI 2013. ArcGIS Desktop
   FANG J-Y, 1990, Ecological Research, V5, P291, DOI 10.1007/BF02347005
   Fang JY, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P2019, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12512
   Fang JY, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P2320, DOI 10.1126/science.1058629
   Feeley KJ, 2007, ECOL LETT, V10, P461, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01033.x
   Franklin J, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P3725, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1519911113
   Frey SJK, 2016, SCI ADV, V2, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1501392
   Gavazov KS, 2010, PLANT SOIL, V337, P19, DOI 10.1007/s11104-010-0477-0
   Gottfried M, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P111, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1329, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1329]
   Guo YL, 2013, CAN J FOREST RES, V43, P826, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2013-0084
   Gustafson EJ, 2013, ECOSYSTEMS, V16, P60, DOI 10.1007/s10021-012-9596-1
   Gustafson EJ, 2011, CAN J FOREST RES, V41, P1405, DOI [10.1139/X11-065, 10.1139/x11-065]
   Hannah L, 2014, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V29, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2014.04.006
   Hararuk O, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P1222, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14561
   Heller NE, 2009, BIOL CONSERV, V142, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.006
   Hewitt N, 2011, BIOL CONSERV, V144, P2560, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.031
   Higgins SI, 2003, OIKOS, V101, P354, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12141.x
   Hof AR, 2017, ECOSPHERE, V8, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1981
   Honnay O, 2002, ECOL LETT, V5, P525, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00346.x
   Isebrands JG, 2001, ENVIRON POLLUT, V115, P359, DOI 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00227-5
   Iverson LR, 2004, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V19, P787, DOI 10.1007/s10980-005-3990-5
   Kelly AE, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P11823, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0802891105
   Kerr G, 1999, FORESTRY, V72, P191, DOI 10.1093/forestry/72.3.191
   Kirschbaum MUF, 2006, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V38, P2510, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.01.030
   Knorr W, 2005, NATURE, V433, P298, DOI 10.1038/nature03226
   Knutti R, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P369, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1716, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1716]
   Kretchun AM, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0102531
   Kruhlov I, 2018, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V18, P1555, DOI 10.1007/s10113-018-1296-8
   Laflower DM, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V362, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.12.015
   Lazaridis M, 2011, ENVIRON POLLUT SER, V19, P67, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0162-5_2
   Lenoir J, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P1768, DOI 10.1126/science.1156831
   Lenz A, 2013, NEW PHYTOL, V200, P1166, DOI 10.1111/nph.12452
   Lewis SL, 2011, SCIENCE, V331, P554, DOI 10.1126/science.1200807
   Li QX, 2017, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V17, P2296, DOI 10.1007/s11368-016-1491-5
   Li YY, 2016, PLANT SOIL, V409, P247, DOI 10.1007/s11104-016-2966-2
   Liu B, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9050248
   Liu CJ, 2004, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V13, P105, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-882X.2004.00072.x
   Liu D, 2014, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V29, P1675, DOI 10.1007/s10980-014-0081-4
   Liu JG, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P9477, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0706436105
   Liu Y, 2007, CHINESE SCI BULL, V52, P50, DOI 10.1007/s11434-007-7006-4
   Loudermilk EL, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P3502, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12310
   Lucash MS, 2018, ECOSPHERE, V9, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2293
   Luo YQ, 2008, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V14, P1986, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01629.x
   Malhi Y, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P169, DOI 10.1126/science.1146961
   Martin GM, 2011, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V4, P723, DOI 10.5194/gmd-4-723-2011
   Martin KL, 2015, ECOSYSTEMS, V18, P76, DOI 10.1007/s10021-014-9813-1
   McLane SC, 2012, ECOL APPL, V22, P142, DOI 10.1890/11-0329.1
   McMahon SM, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P3611, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0912376107
   Molino JF, 2001, SCIENCE, V294, P1702, DOI 10.1126/science.1060284
   Newton AC, 2011, BIOL CONSERV, V144, P1949, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.03.026
   Pan YD, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P988, DOI 10.1126/science.1201609
   Pan YD, 2009, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.049
   Parmesan C, 2006, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V37, P637, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
   Parolo G, 2008, BASIC APPL ECOL, V9, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2007.01.005
   Pearson RG, 2005, BIOL CONSERV, V123, P389, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.12.006
   Peñuelas J, 2009, SCIENCE, V324, P887, DOI 10.1126/science.1173004
   Phillips OL, 2009, SCIENCE, V323, P1344, DOI 10.1126/science.1164033
   Pretzsch H, 2014, NAT COMMUN, V5, DOI 10.1038/ncomms5967
   Prieto I, 2019, J ECOL, V107, P2364, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13168
   Ruiz-Labourdette D, 2012, J BIOGEOGR, V39, P162, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02592.x
   Rustad LE, 2001, OECOLOGIA, V126, P543, DOI 10.1007/s004420000544
   Savage KE, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P2389, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12224
   Schelhaas MJ, 2015, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V15, P1581, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0788-z
   Scheller RM, 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V11, P307, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00906.x
   Scheller RM, 2004, ECOL MODEL, V180, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.01.022
   Scheller RM, 2007, ECOL MODEL, V201, P409, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.10.009
   Scheller RM, 2012, ECOSPHERE, V3, DOI 10.1890/ES12-00241.1
   Scheller RM, 2011, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V26, P1491, DOI 10.1007/s10980-011-9663-6
   Scheller RM, 2011, ECOSYSTEMS, V14, P987, DOI 10.1007/s10021-011-9462-6
   Scheller RM, 2011, ECOL MODEL, V222, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.09.009
   Schindlbacher A, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P2270, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02696.x
   Schweitzer CJ, 2011, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V262, P1729, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.07.020
   Seidl R, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P395, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3303, 10.1038/nclimate3303]
   Shrestha Krishna B., 2013, International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Management, V9, P21, DOI 10.1080/21513732.2012.749303
   Steenberg JWN, 2013, ANN FOREST SCI, V70, P61, DOI 10.1007/s13595-012-0235-y
   Sundqvist MK, 2013, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V44, P261, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135750
   Suseela V, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P336, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02516.x
   Swanson ME, 2009, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V257, P1740, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.045
   Tan ZH, 2012, ENVIRON RES LETT, V7, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044017
   Tang CQ, 1997, PLANT ECOL, V133, P63, DOI 10.1023/A:1009729027521
   Temperli C, 2012, ECOL APPL, V22, P2065, DOI 10.1890/12-0210.1
   Thomas CD, 2004, NATURE, V427, P145, DOI 10.1038/nature02121
   Thompson JR, 2011, ECOL APPL, V21, P2425, DOI 10.1890/10-2383.1
   Tian QX, 2016, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V128, P125, DOI 10.1007/s10533-016-0198-4
   Urban MC, 2015, SCIENCE, V348, P571, DOI 10.1126/science.aaa4984
   Vitt P, 2010, BIOL CONSERV, V143, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.08.015
   Wahid A, 2007, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V61, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.011
   Wang QG, 2017, J PLANT ECOL, V10, P440, DOI 10.1093/jpe/rtw047
   Wang X, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P3229, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12620
   Wang YF, 2018, J FORESTRY RES, V29, P439, DOI 10.1007/s11676-017-0459-7
   Wen XF, 2010, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V7, P357, DOI 10.5194/bg-7-357-2010
   Westerling AL, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P940, DOI 10.1126/science.1128834
   Wickham H, 2014, J STAT SOFTW, V59, P1
   Wickham H, 2009, USE R, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3_1
   Wickham H, 2011, J STAT SOFTW, V40, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v040.i01
   Xi W., 2009, ACTA ECOLOGICA SINIC, V29, P69, DOI [10.1016/j.chnaes.2009.01.001, DOI 10.1016/J.CHNAES.2009.01.001]
   Xu YZ, 2015, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V357, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.08.010
   Yu GR, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P4910, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1317065111
   Zhang PC, 2000, SCIENCE, V288, P2135, DOI 10.1126/science.288.5474.2135
   Zhou LL, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V23, P24135, DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-7624-y
NR 134
TC 9
Z9 12
U1 7
U2 61
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 2150-8925
J9 ECOSPHERE
JI Ecosphere
PD MAR
PY 2020
VL 11
IS 3
AR e03072
DI 10.1002/ecs2.3072
PG 24
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA LJ8PG
UT WOS:000530422900002
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Arbuckle, JG
   Tyndall, JC
   Morton, LW
   Hobbs, J
AF Arbuckle, J. G.
   Tyndall, J. C.
   Morton, L. W.
   Hobbs, J.
TI Climate change typologies and audience segmentation among Corn Belt
   farmers
SO JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptation; audience segmentation; climate change; farmer typology;
   social networks
ID PERCEPTIONS; ADAPTATION; STRATEGIES; POLICY
AB Development of natural resource user typologies has been viewed as a potentially effective means of improving the effectiveness of natural resource management engagement strategies. Prior research on Corn Belt farmers' perspectives on climate change employed a latent class analysis (LCA) that created a six-class typology-the Concerned, Uneasy, Uncertain, Unconcerned, Confident, and Detached-to develop a better understanding of farmer perspectives on climate change and inform more effective climate adaptation and mitigation outreach strategies. The LCA employed 34 variables that are generally unobservable- beliefs about climate change, experience with extreme weather, perceived risks of climate change, and attitudes toward climate action-to identify types. The research reported in this paper builds on this typology of Corn Belt farmers by exploring 33 measures of observable farm enterprise characteristics, land management practices, and farmer demographics to assess whether variations in these observable characteristics between the six farmer classes display systematic patterns that might be sufficiently distinctive to guide audience segmentation strategies. While analyses detected some statistically significant differences, there were few systematic, meaningful observable patterns of difference between groups of farmers with differing perspectives on climate change. In other words, farmers who believe that anthropogenic climate change is occurring, that it poses risks to agriculture, and that adaptive action should be taken, may look very much like farmers who deny the existence of climate change and do not support action. The overall implication of this finding is that climate change engagement efforts by Extension and other agricultural advisors should use caution when looking to observable characteristics to facilitate audience segmentation. Additional analyses indicated that the farmer types that tended to be more concerned about climate change and supportive of adaptive action (e.g., Concerned and Uneasy) reported that they were more influenced by key private and public sector actors in agricultural social networks. On the other hand, farmers who were not concerned about climate change or supportive of adaptation (e. g., the Unconcerned, Confident, and Detached groups, comprising between one-third and one-half of respondents) were less integrated into agricultural networks. This suggests that Extension and other agricultural advisors should expand outreach efforts to farmers who are not already within their spheres of influence.
C1 [Arbuckle, J. G.; Morton, L. W.] Iowa State Univ, Dept Sociol, Ames, IA 50011 USA.
   [Tyndall, J. C.] Iowa State Univ, Dept Nat Resource Management & Ecol, Ames, IA 50011 USA.
   [Hobbs, J.] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA USA.
C3 Iowa State University; Iowa State University; National Aeronautics &
   Space Administration (NASA); NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL);
   California Institute of Technology
RP Arbuckle, JG (corresponding author), Iowa State Univ, Dept Sociol, Ames, IA 50011 USA.
RI Tyndall, John/AAR-6189-2021; Arbuckle, J/P-2151-2016
FU USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA)
   [2011-68002-30190]; Useful to Usable (U2U), Transforming Climate
   Variability and Change Information for Cereal Crop Producers
   [2011-68002-30220]
FX This research is part of two regional collaborative projects funded by
   the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA): Award No.
   2011-68002-30190, Cropping Systems Coordinated Agricultural Project:
   Climate Change, Mitigation, and Adaptation in Corn-based Cropping
   Systems; and Award No. 2011-68002-30220, Useful to Usable (U2U),
   Transforming Climate Variability and Change Information for Cereal Crop
   Producers.
CR Akerlof K, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.006
   Andersen E, 2007, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V82, P353, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.04.021
   [Anonymous], 2009, 2007 Census of Agriculture
   [Anonymous], NATURE CLIMATE CHANG
   [Anonymous], USDA AGR HDB
   [Anonymous], CROP PROD 2010 SUMM
   [Anonymous], PROD SUPPL DISTR ONL
   [Anonymous], SUST AGR SYST 21 CEN
   Arbuckle JG Jr, 2014, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V69, P505, DOI 10.2489/jswc.69.6.505
   Arbuckle JG, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V117, P943, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0707-6
   Barnes AP, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V112, P507, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0226-2
   Briggeman BC, 2007, REV AGR ECON, V29, P765, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2007.00386.x
   Brody SD, 2008, ENVIRON BEHAV, V40, P72, DOI 10.1177/0013916506298800
   Castellano M., 2015, IOWA CAN IMPROVE WAT
   Daloglu I, 2014, AGR SYST, V129, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.05.007
   Drinkwater LE, 2007, ADV AGRON, V92, P163, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2113(04)92003-2
   Emtage N, 2007, ENVIRON MANAGE, V40, P481, DOI 10.1007/s00267-005-0359-z
   Haigh T, 2015, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V7, P83, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-14-00015.1
   Hatfield JL, 2013, MAR FRESHWATER RES, V64, P423, DOI 10.1071/MF12164
   Hyland JJ, 2016, AGR HUM VALUES, V33, P323, DOI 10.1007/s10460-015-9608-9
   ISU (Iowa State University), 2012, SP435A ISU
   Janowiak M.K., 2016, TECHNICAL B USDA
   Loy A., 2013, FARMER PERSPECTIVES, V1
   Maibach EW, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0017571
   McLellan E, 2015, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V51, P263, DOI 10.1111/jawr.12246
   Morton L.W., 2016, Technical Report Series: Climate and Corn-based Cropping Systems Coordinated Agricultural Project Findings and Recommendations Vol 3 of 5, V3
   Morton LW, 2015, J ENVIRON QUAL, V44, P810, DOI 10.2134/jeq2014.08.0352
   Myers TA, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P343, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1754, 10.1038/nclimate1754]
   Prokopy LS, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V130, P261, DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1339-9
   Skevas T, 2014, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V67, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.05.011
   Walthall C., 2012, USDA TECHNICAL B, V1935
   Wandersee C., 2016, THESIS
   Wilke AK, 2015, SCI COMMUN, V37, P371, DOI 10.1177/1075547015581927
NR 33
TC 17
Z9 17
U1 2
U2 35
PU SOIL WATER CONSERVATION SOC
PI ANKENY
PA 945 SW ANKENY RD, ANKENY, IA 50023-9723 USA
SN 0022-4561
EI 1941-3300
J9 J SOIL WATER CONSERV
JI J. Soil Water Conserv.
PD MAY-JUN
PY 2017
VL 72
IS 3
BP 205
EP 214
DI 10.2489/jswc.72.3.205
PG 10
WC Ecology; Soil Science; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Agriculture; Water Resources
GA ET6GQ
UT WOS:000400389700007
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wang, K
   She, DQ
   Zhang, XT
   Wang, YY
   Wen, H
   Yu, JH
   Wang, QG
   Han, SJ
   Wang, WJ
AF Wang, Kai
   She, Danqi
   Zhang, Xiting
   Wang, Yuanyuan
   Wen, Hui
   Yu, Jinghua
   Wang, Qinggui
   Han, Shijie
   Wang, Wenjie
TI Tree richness increased biomass carbon sequestration and ecosystem
   stability of temperate forests in China: Interacted factors and
   implications
SO JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Biomass carbon storage; NDVI; Ecosystem stability; Tree diversity;
   Conifer-broadleaf forests differences; Structure equation model
ID BIODIVERSITY; DIVERSITY; SINK; PRODUCTIVITY; GRASSLANDS; DYNAMICS;
   IMPACTS; WATER
AB Biodiversity loss and forest degradation have received increasing attention worldwide, and their effects on forest biomass carbon storage and stability have not yet been well defined. This study examined 1275 tree plots using the field survey method to quantify the effects of tree diversity, tree sizes, and mycorrhizal symbiont abundance on biomass carbon storages (C-s) and NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index)-based ecosystem stability (standard deviation/mean NDVI = NDVI_S) during the field survey period from 2008 to 2018. Our data showed C-s and NDVI_S averaged at 31-108 t ha(-1) and 32.04-49.28, respectively, and positive relations between C-s and NDVI_S were observed (p < 0.05). Large forest-type and regional variations were found in these two parameters. Broadleaf forests had 74% of C-s (p < 0.05) of the conifer forests, but no differences were in NDVI_S. Cold regions at high latitudes had 71% of NDVI_S in the warm regions at low latitudes, while no differences were in C-s. Moist regions at high longitudes had 2.04 and 1.28-fold higher C-s and NDVI_S (p < 0.05). The >700 m a.s.l. regions had 1.24-fold higher C-s (p < 0.01) than the <700 m a.s.l. regions, but similar NDVI_S (p > 0.05). Nature Reserves had 1.94-fold higher C-s but 30% lower NDVI_S than outside Reserves (p < 0.001). > 40-year-old forests had 1.3- and 2-fold higher C-s and NDVI_S than the young forests. Structural equation modeling and hierarchical partitioning revealed the driving paths responsible for these variations. Tree richness was positively associated with C-s and ecosystem stability, contributing 21.6%-30.6% to the total effects on them; tree sizes significantly promoted the C-s, but had negligible impacts on NDVI_S. MAT's total effects on NDVI_S of conifer forests were 40% higher than that of broadleaf forests, MAP's total effects on C-s varied with forest types; arbuscular mycorrhizal tree dominance exhibited a smaller positive impact on C-s and ecosystem stability in comparison to other factors. Our findings underscore that the significance of climatic-adapted forest management, diversity conservation, and big-sized tree protections can support the achievement of carbon neutrality in China from biomass carbon sequestration and ecosystem stability.
C1 [Wang, Kai; She, Danqi; Wang, Wenjie] Zhejiang A&F Univ, Coll Forestry & Biotechnol, State Key Lab Subtrop Silviculture, Hangzhou 311300, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Kai; Wang, Yuanyuan; Wang, Wenjie] Chinese Acad Sci, Northeast Inst Geog & Agroecol, Changchun 130102, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Kai] Bohai Univ, Sch Tourism, Jinzhou 121000, Liaoning, Peoples R China.
   [She, Danqi; Zhang, Xiting; Wen, Hui] Northeast Forestry Univ, Coll Chem Chem Engn & Resource Utilizat, Key Lab Forest Plant Ecol MOE, Harbin 150040, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Xiting] Leshan Normal Univ, Sch Life Sci, Leshan 614000, Peoples R China.
   [Yu, Jinghua] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Appl Ecol, Shenyang 110016, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Qinggui; Han, Shijie] Qufu Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, Qufu 273165, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Kai] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
C3 Zhejiang A&F University; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Northeast
   Institute of Geography & Agroecology, CAS; Bohai University; Northeast
   Forestry University - China; Leshan Normal University; Chinese Academy
   of Sciences; Shenyang Institute of Applied Ecology, CAS; Qufu Normal
   University; Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy
   of Sciences, CAS
RP Wang, WJ (corresponding author), Zhejiang A&F Univ, Coll Forestry & Biotechnol, State Key Lab Subtrop Silviculture, Hangzhou 311300, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
EM wjwang225@hotmail.com
RI Wang, Yuanyuan/KIH-5532-2024; 张, 喜庭/HMP-0152-2023
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41730641, 2022LFR120];
   Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2007FY110400, 2014FY110600]
FX This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (No. 41730641) , and the startup project from Zhejiang
   Agri-culture and Forestry University (2022LFR120) . The field data
   collection was supported by projects from the Ministry of Science and
   Technology of China (2007FY110400, 2014FY110600) .
CR Ali A, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V127, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107760
   Ali A, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P2810, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14707
   Almond R., 2020, Living Planet Report 2020-Bending the Curve of Biodiversity Loss (No. LPR2020)
   Amelung W, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-18887-7
   [Anonymous], 1997, GEOGRAPHY VEGETATION
   Babst F, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aat4313
   Baul TK, 2021, CARBON BAL MANAGE, V16, DOI 10.1186/s13021-021-00175-6
   Bennett JA, 2017, SCIENCE, V355, P181, DOI 10.1126/science.aai8212
   Cao XD, 2023, PLANT SOIL, V486, P681, DOI 10.1007/s11104-023-05900-3
   Cardinale BJ, 2013, ECOLOGY, V94, P1697, DOI 10.1890/12-1334.1
   Carteron A, 2022, NAT ECOL EVOL, V6, P370, DOI 10.1038/s41559-021-01634-6
   Chen LT, 2021, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V30, P1418, DOI 10.1111/geb.13307
   Chen Y, 2024, FOR ECOSYST, V11, DOI 10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100205
   Cholewinska O, 2021, FORESTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/f12091162
   Chun JH, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V744, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140783
   Committee N.G., 2014, Guidelines for Carbon Sink Measurement and Monitoring of Afforestation Projects
   Craven D, 2018, NAT ECOL EVOL, V2, P1579, DOI 10.1038/s41559-018-0647-7
   Dai LM, 2019, J FORESTRY RES, V30, P2227, DOI 10.1007/s11676-018-0771-x
   de Bello F, 2021, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V36, P822, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2021.05.001
   Deng MF, 2023, SCI ADV, V9, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.add4468
   Ding Y, 2021, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V482, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118805
   DIXON RK, 1994, SCIENCE, V263, P185, DOI 10.1126/science.263.5144.185
   Drake JE, 2019, NEW PHYTOL, V222, P1298, DOI 10.1111/nph.15629
   [杜倩 Du Qian], 2022, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V42, P9712
   Fan Wen-Yi, 2011, Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, V35, P402, DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00402
   Fang JY, 2005, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V32, DOI 10.1029/2005GL024231
   Farooqi TJA, 2021, J FORESTRY RES, V32, P7, DOI 10.1007/s11676-020-01138-2
   Fichtner A, 2020, J ECOL, V108, P865, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13353
   Gao WQ, 2021, ECOL EVOL, V11, P16806, DOI 10.1002/ece3.8312
   García-Palacios P, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P8400, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1800425115
   García-Valdés R, 2020, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V29, P1360, DOI 10.1111/geb.13112
   Gavrikov VL, 2016, J FORESTRY RES, V27, P907, DOI 10.1007/s11676-015-0189-7
   Gerz M, 2016, J VEG SCI, V27, P89, DOI 10.1111/jvs.12338
   Ghafoor GZ, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-14333-4
   Grime JP, 1998, J ECOL, V86, P902, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00306.x
   Grman E, 2010, ECOL LETT, V13, P1400, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01533.x
   Hagan JG, 2023, NAT ECOL EVOL, V7, P332, DOI 10.1038/s41559-022-01920-x
   He NP, 2020, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V35, P908, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2020.06.003
   He ZH, 2014, J CEREAL SCI, V59, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.jcs.2013.07.012
   Heinrich VHA, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22050-1
   HILL MO, 1973, ECOLOGY, V54, P427, DOI 10.2307/1934352
   Hoyle R. H., 2012, HDB STRUCTURAL EQUAT
   HURLBERT SH, 1971, ECOLOGY, V52, P577, DOI 10.2307/1934145
   Ji XC, 2023, PLANT SOIL, V488, P377, DOI 10.1007/s11104-023-05980-1
   Jiao WZ, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-24016-9
   Jing LX, 2024, EUR J FOREST RES, V143, P813, DOI 10.1007/s10342-023-01653-x
   JONES CG, 1994, OIKOS, V69, P373, DOI 10.2307/3545850
   Kigel J, 2021, J VEG SCI, V32, DOI 10.1111/jvs.13012
   Lai JS, 2022, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V13, P782, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.13800
   LARSEN JB, 1995, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V73, P85, DOI 10.1016/0378-1127(94)03501-M
   Le Quere C., 2018, Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., V2018, P1
   Lee H, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V148, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.004
   Li D., 2018, J. Open Source Softw, V3, P1041, DOI DOI 10.21105/JOSS.01041
   Li KW, 2020, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V282, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107865
   Li X, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P1831, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-2025-2
   Li Y, 2022, J ECOL, V110, P1656, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13900
   Li Y, 2018, SCI ADV, V4, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aar4182
   Lian X, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aax0255
   Lin GG, 2015, J ECOL, V103, P1224, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12429
   Liu BH, 2004, J CLIMATE, V17, P4453, DOI 10.1175/3230.1
   Liu CF, 2012, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V11, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.03.002
   Liu D, 2022, NAT GEOSCI, V15, P800, DOI 10.1038/s41561-022-01026-w
   Liu G., 2000, ACTA ECOLOGICA SINIC, V20, P733
   Liu XJ, 2018, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V285, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2018.1240
   Liu YB, 2015, SCI REP-UK, V5, DOI 10.1038/srep13799
   Loreau M, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P106, DOI 10.1111/ele.12073
   Lu YL, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abd0952
   Luo Y., 2015, COMPREHENSIVE DATABA
   Lutz JA, 2018, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V27, P849, DOI 10.1111/geb.12747
   Ma SJ, 2023, J FORESTRY RES, DOI 10.1007/s11676-022-01581-3
   Mahecha MD, 2022, NATURE, V612, P30, DOI 10.1038/d41586-022-04152-y
   Mathias JM, 2022, ECOL LETT, V25, P498, DOI 10.1111/ele.13945
   Maure LA, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V345, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118929
   McDowell NG, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P295, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2873, 10.1038/nclimate2873]
   Meineke EK, 2018, J APPL ECOL, V55, P1701, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.13130
   Mensah S, 2018, OECOLOGIA, V187, P783, DOI 10.1007/s00442-018-4144-0
   Murphy HT, 2022, ECOL EVOL, V12, DOI 10.1002/ece3.9324
   Ngute ASK, 2024, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V30, DOI 10.1111/gcb.17140
   Nilsson MC, 2005, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V3, P421, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0421:UVAAFE]2.0.CO;2
   Oehri J, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P10160, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1703928114
   Pan YD, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P988, DOI 10.1126/science.1201609
   Parmesan C, 2007, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V13, P1860, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01404.x
   Peng SZ, 2019, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V11, P1931, DOI 10.5194/essd-11-1931-2019
   Pennekamp F, 2018, NATURE, V563, P109, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0627-8
   Petrenko TY, 2022, FOR ECOSYST, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.fecs.2022.100015
   Qian H, 2003, GEOBOTANT, V28, P181
   Sanaei A, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V757, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143724
   Schulze E.-D., 2019, Plant Ecology
   Smith S.E., 2010, Mycorrhizal symbiosis
   Soudzilovskaia NA, 2020, NEW PHYTOL, V227, P955, DOI 10.1111/nph.16569
   Soudzilovskaia NA, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V208, P280, DOI 10.1111/nph.13447
   Sterner RW., 2002, ECOLOGICAL STOICHIOM
   Tagesson T, 2020, NAT ECOL EVOL, V4, P202, DOI 10.1038/s41559-019-1090-0
   Tan XP, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V142, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109233
   Team R.D.C., 2020, R Version 4.0.3 R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 4.0, V3
   Tedersoo L, 2020, SCIENCE, V367, P867, DOI 10.1126/science.aba1223
   Tilman D, 1999, ECOLOGY, V80, P1455, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1455:TECOCI]2.0.CO;2
   TILMAN D, 1994, NATURE, V367, P363, DOI 10.1038/367363a0
   Traill LW, 2010, J ANIM ECOL, V79, P937, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01695.x
   Valencia E, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V206, P660, DOI 10.1111/nph.13268
   Wagg C, 2011, ECOLOGY, V92, P1303, DOI 10.1890/10-1915.1
   [王洪岩 Wang Hongyan], 2012, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V32, P833
   Wang J, 2020, NATURE, V586, P720, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2849-9
   Wang K, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P115337, DOI 10.1007/s11356-023-30445-4
   Wang SP, 2021, ECOLOGY, V102, DOI 10.1002/ecy.3347
   Wang WJ, 2018, J BIOGEOGR, V45, P2766, DOI 10.1111/jbi.13467
   Wang Wen-jie, 2022, Journal of Beijing Forestry University, V44, P52, DOI 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220202
   Wang WJ, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V404, P214, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.08.047
   Wang YY, 2022, J FORESTRY RES, V33, P623, DOI 10.1007/s11676-021-01313-z
   Wang YY, 2020, FORESTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/f11030295
   Wu AC, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109021
   Xu L, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-20764-9
   Xu S, 2020, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V287, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2020.2063
   Yan GY, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V819, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153086
   Yan Y, 2021, J ECOL, V109, P3370, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13725
   Yang GW, 2016, OIKOS, V125, P576, DOI 10.1111/oik.02351
   Yang H, 2019, SCIENCE, V363, DOI [10.1126/science.aav9117, 10.1126/science.aat6405]
   Yang YB, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V838, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156192
   Yin DC, 2018, J FORESTRY RES, V29, P1775, DOI 10.1007/s11676-017-0583-4
   Yin YH, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-18798-6
   Yu DP, 2011, ENVIRON MANAGE, V48, P1122, DOI 10.1007/s00267-011-9633-4
   Yu Z, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P68, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14484
   Yuan ZQ, 2018, ANN FOREST SCI, V75, DOI 10.1007/s13595-018-0745-3
   Zhang CH, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V119, P1163, DOI 10.1002/2013JG002515
   Zhang ChunHua Zhang ChunHua, 2018, China Environmental Science, V38, P4678
   Zhang CY, 2020, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V29, P1257, DOI 10.1111/geb.13101
   Zhang PC, 2000, SCIENCE, V288, P2135, DOI 10.1126/science.288.5474.2135
   Zhang QY, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V860, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160548
   Zhang XT, 2024, CATENA, V236, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107746
   Zhang Y, 2017, FUNCT ECOL, V31, P419, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12699
   Zhong C, 2023, J FORESTRY RES, V34, P623, DOI 10.1007/s11676-023-01602-9
   Zhou GY, 2022, ADV SCI, V9, DOI 10.1002/advs.202201144
   Zhu XR, 2024, SCI BULL, V69, P2430, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2024.05.022
NR 133
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 39
U2 39
PU ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI LONDON
PA 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON NW1 7DX, ENGLAND
SN 0301-4797
EI 1095-8630
J9 J ENVIRON MANAGE
JI J. Environ. Manage.
PD SEP
PY 2024
VL 368
AR 122214
DI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122214
EA AUG 2024
PG 18
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA E4M6R
UT WOS:001302766100001
PM 39191057
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Yang, MJ
   Wang, GL
AF Yang, Meijian
   Wang, Guiling
TI Heat stress to jeopardize crop production in the US Corn Belt based on
   downscaled CMIP5 projections
SO AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Crop yield; Climate change; Heat stress; Adaptation; DSSAT; Corn Belt
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACTS; CENTRAL UNITED-STATES; FERTILIZER USE; YIELD;
   MAIZE; DROUGHT; PRECIPITATION; TEMPERATURE; EXTREMES; SUMMER
AB CONTEXT: Global food security faces increasing challenges from the changing climate. Changes of agricultural output from some of the most productive regions such as the US Corn Belt can largely affect the world's food market. Developing predictive understanding of the agricultural risk of climate change and potential mitigation strategies is critical for the global food security.
   OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess the responses of maize and soybean yield to projected climate changes in the Corn Belt, identify the shifting environment stressors on crop yield, and tackle potential climate adaptation strategies.
   METHODS: We drive a process-based model, the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer, with high-resolution statistically downscaled and bias-corrected historical and future climates from ten CMIP5 models in the MACA-2 database.
   RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The multi-model ensemble mean suggests a 12% decrease of maize yield by mid-century and 40% by late century, with a high degree of model consensus in the direction of changes; for individual models, the projected decrease of maize yield by late century ranges from <5% to over 80%, with the worst crop outcome corresponding to the most sensitive climate models. Soybean yield is projected to increase by midcentury with a high degree of model consensus, but such consensus is lost by late century as some projections shift to significant decreases. Crop yield in the Corn Belt is currently limited by water stress, but is projected to be increasingly limited by heat stress as well after the midcentury. The mounting heat stress will drive the most productive zone for maize to shift from central to northern part of the Corn Belt, but the projected increase in the northern states cannot fully compensate for the decrease in the south, causing the total production to decrease if agricultural practice stays the same. Earlier planting can alleviate only a small fraction of the heat-induced crop loss in a warmer climate. Climate change will (at least partially) offset the yield boost caused by agricultural technology and intensification.
   SIGNIFICANCE: This study advances our predictive understanding of crop yield responses to climate change, and suggests that a multitude of strategies will be needed to address the climate change challenges for the U.S. agriculture.
C1 [Yang, Meijian; Wang, Guiling] Univ Connecticut, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Storrs, CT 06269 USA.
   [Yang, Meijian; Wang, Guiling] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Environm Sci & Engn, Storrs, CT 06269 USA.
   [Yang, Meijian] Columbia Univ, Ctr Climate Syst Res, Climate Sch, New York, NY 10025 USA.
   [Yang, Meijian] NASA, Goddard Inst Space Studies, New York, NY 10025 USA.
C3 University of Connecticut; University of Connecticut; Columbia
   University; National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA); NASA
   Goddard Space Flight Center; Goddard Institute for Space Studies
RP Wang, GL (corresponding author), Univ Connecticut, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Storrs, CT 06269 USA.; Wang, GL (corresponding author), Univ Connecticut, Ctr Environm Sci & Engn, Storrs, CT 06269 USA.
EM guiling.wang@uconn.edu
OI Wang, Guiling/0000-0002-9744-2563
FU CEE Department Research Initiative; UConn Center for Biological Risks
FX This work was partially supported by the UConn Center for Biological
   Risks and CEE Department Research Initiative. The authors thank the five
   anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions on
   earlier versions of the manuscript.
CR Abatzoglou JT, 2013, INT J CLIMATOL, V33, P121, DOI 10.1002/joc.3413
   Abatzoglou JT, 2012, INT J CLIMATOL, V32, P772, DOI 10.1002/joc.2312
   Ahmed KF, 2013, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V100, P320, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.11.003
   Allan RP, 2008, SCIENCE, V321, P1481, DOI 10.1126/science.1160787
   Alter RE, 2018, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V45, P1586, DOI 10.1002/2017GL075604
   [Anonymous], 2015, ERR-189
   [Anonymous], 2010, AGR HDB, V628, P1
   Assefa Y, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-23362-x
   Asseng S, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P143, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2470, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2470]
   Bal S.K., 2018, Adv. Crop Environ. Interact, DOI [10.1007/978-981-13-1861-0, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-1861-0]
   Boote K. J., 1998, Agricultural systems modeling and simulation., P651
   Burchfield E, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V159, P329, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02567-7
   Butler EE, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P11935, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1808035115
   Cao PY, 2018, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V10, P969, DOI 10.5194/essd-10-969-2018
   Challinor AJ, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P287, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2153, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2153]
   Chen HP, 2020, SCI BULL, V65, P1415, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2020.05.015
   Cooper M, 2020, CROP SCI, V60, P582, DOI 10.1002/csc2.20109
   Eck MA, 2020, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108053
   FAO IFAD UNICEF and WHO, 2020, STAT FOOD SEC NUTR W, DOI [10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2300145, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2300145]
   Fei CC, 2023, ANTHROPOCENE, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.ancene.2023.100386
   Fernandez-Cornejo J., 2014, Genetically engineered crops in the United States
   Fraga H, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P3774, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13382
   Franke JA, 2020, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V13, P2315, DOI 10.5194/gmd-13-2315-2020
   Friedlingstein P, 2020, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V12, P3269, DOI 10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020
   Green TR, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V618, P1613, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.325
   Grose MR, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001469
   Hammer GL, 2009, CROP SCI, V49, P299, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2008.03.0152
   Hausfather Z, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P27791, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2017124117
   Hengl T, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0105992
   Hoogenboom G., 2017, Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) Version 4.7
   Hsiang SM, 2013, SCIENCE, V341, P1212, DOI 10.1126/science.1235367
   IEA-International Energy Agency, 2021, World Energy Outlook
   International Food Policy Research Institute, 2019, HarvardDataverse, V3
   International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI), 2015, HarvardDataverse, V2
   Jägermeyr J, 2021, NAT FOOD, V2, P875, DOI 10.1038/s43016-021-00400-y
   Jin ZN, 2019, FIELD CROP RES, V240, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.04.013
   Jin ZN, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, pE522, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13946
   Jin Z, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P2687, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13617
   Jin ZN, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P3112, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13376
   Johnson B., 2011, Nebraska Irrigation Fact Sheet
   Jones JW, 2003, EUR J AGRON, V18, P235, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00107-7
   Joyce Linda A, 2018, FSRDA, DOI 10.2737/RDS-2018-0014
   Karan K, 2022, J ARID LAND, V14, P1234, DOI 10.1007/s40333-022-0081-1
   Knutti R, 2013, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V40, P1194, DOI 10.1002/grl.50256
   Kucharik CJ, 2008, ENVIRON RES LETT, V3, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/3/3/034003
   Leng GY, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab7b24
   Li Y, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P2325, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14628
   Li ZG, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P2032, DOI 10.1021/es505624x
   Liu YB, 2015, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V35, P83, DOI 10.1007/s13593-014-0259-9
   Lobell DB, 2007, ENVIRON RES LETT, V2, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/2/1/014002
   Lobell DB, 2020, NAT FOOD, V1, P729, DOI 10.1038/s43016-020-00165-w
   Lobell DB, 2014, SCIENCE, V344, P516, DOI 10.1126/science.1251423
   Messina C, 2021, J EXP BOT, V72, P5235, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erab231
   Miao CY, 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/9/5/055007
   Mueller ND, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P7505, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0096.1
   Mueller ND, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P317, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2825, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2825]
   Ortiz-Bobea A, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1e75
   Perry ED, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-17707-2
   Pierce DW, 2023, J HYDROMETEOROL, V24, P951, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-22-0194.1
   Pierce DW, 2014, J HYDROMETEOROL, V15, P2558, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0082.1
   Riahi K, 2007, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V74, P887, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.026
   Riahi K, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P33, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y
   Rosenzweig C, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3268, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1222463110
   Sánchez B, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P408, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12389
   Schauberger B, 2017, NAT COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1038/ncomms13931
   Schlenker W, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P15594, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0906865106
   Schwalm CR, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P19656, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2007117117
   Seneviratne SI, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001474
   Sloat LL, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-15076-4
   Smith SJ, 2006, ENERG J, P373
   Sundquist E.T., 2009, USGS Open-File Report
   Taylor KE, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P485, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
   Thorarinsdottir TL, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abc778
   Trenberth KE, 1999, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V42, P327, DOI 10.1023/A:1005488920935
   Trenberth KE, 2003, B AM METEOROL SOC, V84, P1205, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-84-9-1205
   Trenberth KE, 2011, CLIM RES, V47, P123, DOI 10.3354/cr00953
   USDA, 2020, USDA ERS-Crops
   USDA-NASS, 2018, Trends in U.S. Agriculture-Mechanization
   Wang GL, 2020, J HYDROMETEOROL, V21, P2739, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-19-0275.1
   Wang GL, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P268, DOI [10.1038/nclimate3239, 10.1038/NCLIMATE3239]
   Wang S, 2020, SCI DATA, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41597-020-00646-4
   Webber H, 2015, EUR J AGRON, V71, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2015.09.002
   Wise M, 2009, SCIENCE, V324, P1183, DOI 10.1126/science.1168475
   Xiong W, 2020, NAT FOOD, V1, DOI 10.1038/s43016-019-0004-2
   Yang MJ, 2021, AGR WATER MANAGE, V243, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106430
   Yang MJ, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V723, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137893
   Yu QY, 2020, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V12, P3545, DOI 10.5194/essd-12-3545-2020
NR 87
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 6
U2 15
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0308-521X
EI 1873-2267
J9 AGR SYST
JI Agric. Syst.
PD OCT
PY 2023
VL 211
AR 103746
DI 10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103746
EA AUG 2023
PG 14
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA S2NW1
UT WOS:001069598800001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Vedeld, T
   Hofstad, H
   Mathur, M
   Büker, P
   Stordal, F
AF Vedeld, Trond
   Hofstad, Hege
   Mathur, Mihir
   Buker, Patrick
   Stordal, Frode
TI Reaching out? Governing weather and climate services (WCS) for farmers
SO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Weather and climate services; Governance; Agro-meteorological services;
   Climate adaptation; Co-creation; Participation
ID BOUNDARY ORGANIZATIONS; INFORMATION; SCIENCE
AB High-quality weather and climate services (WCS) can be critical for communicating knowledge about current and future weather and climate risks for adaptation and disaster risk management in the agricultural sector. This paper investigates the structure and performance of weather and climate services for farmers from a governance perspective. Empirically the paper compares the institutional design and operations of agro-meteorological services in Maharashtra/India and Norway through a 'most different case study' approach. The two cases were selected to represent great diversity in location, scale and institutional design. A governance approach based on semi-direct interviews and policy and institutional analysis was combined with local survey data of farmers' perceptions and use of the services. Despite the fact that the context for the two agromet advisory services was very different from a climate-weather, eco-agriculture and socio-institutional angle, the analysis reveals great similarities in the services structures and critical governance challenges. In both countries the agromet services communicated knowledge that was largely perceived not to be well tailored to farmers' needs for decisions in specific crops- and farm operations, spatially too coarse to address local issues, and, often unreliable or inaccurate in terms of the quality of data. Farmers did, however, respond positively to specific and locally relevant information on e.g., warnings about high rainfall and spread of pests. Observing such similarities across very diverse contexts enhances the generalization potential, precisely because they evolved under very different circumstances. Similar observations find support in the wider WCS literature. Based on the empirical findings, we propose a more deliberate approach to institutional design of WCS in order to enhance governance performance and co-creation of the services at local, district and national scales. It is suggested that greater participation of farmers and agricultural extension agents in the co-creation of these services is a necessary means of improving the services, supported by the WCS literature. However, we insist that greater participation is only likely to materialize if the deficiencies in institutional design and knowledge quality and relevance are addressed to greater extent than done today. The comparison between the two services shows that Norway can learn from India that a more ambitious scope and multiple forms of communication, including the use of social media/WhatsApp groups, can facilitate greater awareness and interest among farmers in multi-purpose agromet services for multi-way communication. India can learn from Norway that a more integrated and decentralized institutional design can strengthen the network attributes of the services, foster co-creation, and improve participation of both poor and large-scale farmers and extension agents.
C1 [Vedeld, Trond; Hofstad, Hege] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Norwegian Inst Urban & Reg Res NIBR, Postbox 4,St Olavs Plass, N-0130 Oslo, Norway.
   [Mathur, Mihir] India Habitat Ctr, Energy & Resource Inst TERI, Lodhi Rd, New Delhi 110003, India.
   [Buker, Patrick] Univ York, Dept Environm & Geog, York Ctr, Stockholm Environm Inst, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England.
   [Stordal, Frode] Univ Oslo, Sect Meteorol & Oceanog, Gaustadalleen 210349 OSLO,Forskningspk, N-0315 Oslo, Norway.
   [Mathur, Mihir] DESTA Res LLP, New Delhi, India.
C3 Oslo Metropolitan University (OsloMet); University of York - UK;
   University of Oslo
RP Vedeld, T (corresponding author), Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Norwegian Inst Urban & Reg Res NIBR, Postbox 4,St Olavs Plass, N-0130 Oslo, Norway.
EM trondv@oslomet.no; hegeh@oslomet.no; mihir09mathur@gmail.com;
   patrick.bueker@giz.de; frode.stordal@geo.uio.no
RI Hofstad, Hege/LEN-1877-2024; Büker, Patrick/G-6460-2019; Stordal,
   Frode/R-6672-2017; Vedeld, Trond/KWU-7892-2024
OI Vedeld, Trond/0000-0001-9618-9757
FU Research Council of Norway (RCN) [240018]
FX Funded by the Research Council of Norway (RCN) under the project
   GovClimServices (2015-2018) no. 240018.
CR Adger N W., 2009, Adaptation to Climate Change
   [Anonymous], EC POLIT
   [Anonymous], HANBOOK THEORIES GOV
   [Anonymous], 2014, MAPPING CLIMATE SERV
   [Anonymous], ADM SOC
   [Anonymous], AM METEOROL SOC
   [Anonymous], 2014, Earth Perspect, DOI DOI 10.1186/2194-6434-1-15
   [Anonymous], SCAND J PUBLIC ADM
   [Anonymous], WEATHER CLIM INF SER
   [Anonymous], WEATHER B
   [Anonymous], 54 CCFAFS
   Ansell C, 2008, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, V18, P543, DOI 10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Guy P, 2016, EARTHS FUTURE, V4, P79, DOI 10.1002/2015EF000338
   Buontempo C, 2018, CLIM SERV, V9, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2017.06.011
   Christel I, 2018, CLIM SERV, V9, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2017.06.002
   Dilling L, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P680, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006
   George AL., 2005, Case studies and theory development in the social sciences
   Golding Nicola, 2017, Climate Services, V8, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2017.11.002
   Golding Nicola, 2017, Climate Services, V5, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2017.03.004
   Guston DH, 2001, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V26, P399, DOI 10.1177/016224390102600401
   Harjanne A, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V46, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.008
   Hewitt CD, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P614, DOI 10.1038/nclimate3378
   Hoppe R, 2013, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V4, P283, DOI 10.1002/wcc.225
   Kundzewicz Zbigniew W., 2017, Climate Services, V8, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2017.10.004
   Lemos MC, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P789, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1614, 10.1038/nclimate1614]
   Nesheim I, 2017, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/agriculture7080070
   O'Brien K, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V31, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.04.010
   Pant B., 2012, INT J AGR MAN DEV IJ
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Rathore L. S., 2013, J AGR PHYS, V13, P89
   Singh C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P389, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1318744
   Thakur D., 2017, International Journal of Science Environment and Technology, V6, P2190
   Vargo S.L., 2006, The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions
   Vaughan Catherine, 2017, Climate Services, V8, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2017.11.001
   Vaughan Catherine, 2016, Climate Services, V4, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2016.11.004
   Vaughan C, 2018, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V10, P373, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-17-0030.1
   Vaughan C, 2014, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V5, P587, DOI 10.1002/wcc.290
   Vedeld T., 2014, DROUGHT JALNA COMMUN
   Vedeld T, 2019, CLIM SERV, V15, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2019.100103
   Vogel Jason, 2017, Climate Services, V6, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2017.07.003
   Weber ER, 2008, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V68, P334, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x
NR 41
TC 14
Z9 15
U1 1
U2 17
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1462-9011
EI 1873-6416
J9 ENVIRON SCI POLICY
JI Environ. Sci. Policy
PD FEB
PY 2020
VL 104
BP 208
EP 216
DI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.11.010
PG 9
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA KL2XG
UT WOS:000513291300022
OA Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Ekram, MAE
   Campbell, M
   Kose, SH
   Plet, C
   Hamilton, R
   Bijaksana, S
   Grice, K
   Russell, J
   Stevenson, J
   Vogel, H
   Coolen, MJL
AF Ekram, Md Akhtar-E
   Campbell, Matthew
   Kose, Sureyya H.
   Plet, Chloe
   Hamilton, Rebecca
   Bijaksana, Satria
   Grice, Kliti
   Russell, James
   Stevenson, Janelle
   Vogel, Hendrik
   Coolen, Marco J. L.
TI A 1 Ma sedimentary ancient DNA (<i>sed</i>aDNA) record of catchment
   vegetation changes and the developmental history of tropical Lake Towuti
   (Sulawesi, Indonesia)
SO GEOBIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE metabarcoding; paleodepositional environment; Quaternary; sedimentary
   ancient DNA; tropical paleovegetation record
ID ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE; RAIN-FORESTS; N-ALKANES; POLLEN; TERRESTRIAL;
   VARIABILITY; EVOLUTION; DYNAMICS; HOLOCENE; PLANTS
AB Studying past ecosystems from ancient environmental DNA preserved in lake sediments (sedaDNA) is a rapidly expanding field. This research has mainly involved Holocene sediments from lakes in cool climates, with little known about the suitability of sedaDNA to reconstruct substantially older ecosystems in the warm tropics. Here, we report the successful recovery of chloroplast trnL (UAA) sequences (trnL-P6 loop) from the sedimentary record of Lake Towuti (Sulawesi, Indonesia) to elucidate changes in regional tropical vegetation assemblages during the lake's Late Quaternary paleodepositional history. After the stringent removal of contaminants and sequence artifacts, taxonomic assignment of the remaining genuine trnL-P6 reads showed that native nitrogen-fixing legumes, C-3 grasses, and shallow wetland vegetation (Alocasia) were most strongly associated with >1-million-year-old (>1 Ma) peats and silts (114-98.8 m composite depth; mcd), which were deposited in a landscape of active river channels, shallow lakes, and peat-swamps. A statistically significant shift toward partly submerged shoreline vegetation that was likely rooted in anoxic muddy soils (i.e., peatland forest trees and wetland C-3 grasses (Oryzaceae) and nutrient-demanding aquatic herbs (presumably Oenanthe javanica)) occurred at 76 mcd (similar to 0.8 Ma), similar to 0.2 Ma after the transition into a permanent lake. This wetland vegetation was most strongly associated with diatom ooze (46-37 mcd), thought to be deposited during maximum nutrient availability and primary productivity. Herbs (Brassicaceae), trees/shrubs (Fabaceae and Theaceae), and C-3 grasses correlated with inorganic parameters, indicating increased drainage of ultramafic sediments and laterite soils from the lakes' catchment, particularly at times of inferred drying. Downcore variability in trnL-P6 from tropical forest trees (Toona), shady ground cover herbs (Zingiberaceae), and tree orchids (Luisia) most strongly correlated with sediments of a predominantly felsic signature considered to be originating from the catchment of the Loeha River draining into Lake Towuti during wetter climate conditions. However, the co-correlation with dry climate-adapted trees (i.e., Castanopsis or Lithocarpus) plus C-4 grasses suggests that increased precipitation seasonality also contributed to the increased drainage of felsic Loeha River sediments. This multiproxy approach shows that despite elevated in situ temperatures, tropical lake sediments potentially comprise long-term archives of ancient environmental DNA for reconstructing ecosystems, which warrants further exploration.
C1 [Ekram, Md Akhtar-E; Campbell, Matthew; Kose, Sureyya H.; Plet, Chloe; Grice, Kliti; Coolen, Marco J. L.] Curtin Univ, Inst Geosci Res TIGeR, Western Australia Organ & Isotope Geochem Ctr WAOI, Sch Earth & Planetary Sci EPS, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.
   [Hamilton, Rebecca; Stevenson, Janelle] Australian Natl Univ, ARC Ctr Excellence Australian Biodivers & Heritage, Sch Culture Hist & Language, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
   [Bijaksana, Satria] Inst Teknol Bandung, Fac Min & Petr Engn, Bandung, Indonesia.
   [Russell, James] Brown Univ, Dept Earth Environm & Planetary Sci DEEPS, Providence, RI USA.
   [Vogel, Hendrik] Univ Bern, Inst Geol Sci, Bern, Switzerland.
   [Vogel, Hendrik] Univ Bern, Oeschger Ctr Climate Change Res, Bern, Switzerland.
C3 Curtin University; Australian National University; Institute Technology
   of Bandung; Brown University; University of Bern; University of Bern
RP Coolen, MJL (corresponding author), Curtin Univ, Inst Geosci Res TIGeR, Western Australia Organ & Isotope Geochem Ctr WAOI, Sch Earth & Planetary Sci EPS, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.
EM marco.coolen@curtin.edu.au
RI Hamilton, Rebecca/ITV-8574-2023; Bijaksana, Satria/I-4683-2013; Vogel,
   Hendrik/C-6148-2014
OI Hamilton, Rebecca/0000-0002-5443-8353; Vogel,
   Hendrik/0000-0002-9902-8120; Plet, Chloe/0000-0003-1959-6732; Bijaksana,
   Satria/0000-0001-6374-4128; EKRAM, MD AKHTAR-E/0000-0002-0446-7789
FU Australian Research Council [DP15102587]; Australian Research Council
   (ARC); Curtin Office; Research and Development (ORF); International
   Continental Scientific Drilling Program (ICDP); U.S. National Science
   Foundation (NSF) [200021_153053]; Swiss National Science Foundation;
   Ministry of Research, Education, and Higher Technology of Indonesia;
   Brown University; Institute for Geoscience Research (TIGeR) at Curtin
   University; US Continental Scientific Drilling and Coordination Office;
   Ministry of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia; Natural Resources
   Conservation Centre (BKSDA); Government of Luwu Timur of Sulawesi; Wiley
   - Curtin University agreement via the Council of Australian University
   Librarians; Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_153053]
   Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
FX This work was primarily supported by the Australian Research Council
   (ARC), Discovery Grant # DP15102587. The Curtin Office provided
   additional financial support for Research and Development (ORF) for
   funding AE's PhD stipend. This research was furthermore carried out with
   partial support from the International Continental Scientific Drilling
   Program (ICDP), the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the Swiss
   National Science Foundation (SNSF; grant no: 200021_153053), PT Vale
   Indonesia, the Ministry of Research, Education, and Higher Technology of
   Indonesia (RISTEK), Brown University, and The Institute for Geoscience
   Research (TIGeR) at Curtin University. We thank PT Vale Indonesia, the
   US Continental Scientific Drilling and Coordination Office, the US
   National Lacustrine Core Repository, and DOSECC Exploration Services for
   logistical support. The research was carried out with permission from
   RISTEK, the Ministry of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia, the Natural
   Resources Conservation Centre (BKSDA), and the Government of Luwu Timur
   of Sulawesi. We thank Dr Cornelia Wuchter (Curtin University) for
   helpful discussions. Open access publishing facilitated by Curtin
   University, as part of the Wiley - Curtin University agreement via the
   Council of Australian University Librarians.
CR Aliscioni S, 2012, NEW PHYTOL, V193, P304, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03972.x
   Alsos IG, 2021, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V259, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106903
   Alsos IG, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0195403
   [Anonymous], 2019, International Union for Conservation of Nature Annual Report 2019
   Anshari G, 2004, J QUATERNARY SCI, V19, P637, DOI 10.1002/jqs.879
   Armbrecht L, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-33494-4
   Baldwin AH, 1996, AM J BOT, V83, P470, DOI 10.2307/2446216
   Bi XH, 2005, ORG GEOCHEM, V36, P1405, DOI 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.06.001
   Biagioni S, 2015, REV PALAEOBOT PALYNO, V213, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2014.11.005
   Boessenkool S, 2014, CONSERV BIOL, V28, P446, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12195
   Boyer F, 2016, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V16, P176, DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12428
   Bremond L, 2017, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V170, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.06.025
   Cannon CH, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P11188, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0809865106
   Capo E, 2021, QUATERNARY, V4, DOI 10.3390/quat4010006
   Caporaso JG, 2012, ISME J, V6, P1621, DOI 10.1038/ismej.2012.8
   CARACO NF, 1989, NATURE, V341, P316, DOI 10.1038/341316a0
   Chang YM, 2013, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V66, P453, DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.009
   Chikaraishi Y, 2003, PHYTOCHEMISTRY, V63, P361, DOI 10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00749-5
   Clarke K.R., 2015, PRIMER v7: user manual/tutorial
   Cockell CS, 2021, FRONT MICROBIOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2021.668240
   Coolen MJL, 2007, ENVIRON MICROBIOL, V9, P238, DOI 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01134.x
   Coolen MJL, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P8609, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1219283110
   Coolen MJL, 2004, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V223, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.04.014
   Costa KM, 2015, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V417, P467, DOI 10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.10.009
   Courtin J, 2021, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V09, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2021.625096
   Crowe SA, 2008, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V53, P319, DOI 10.4319/lo.2008.53.1.0319
   Culmsee H, 2010, J BIOGEOGR, V37, P960, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02269.x
   De Cáceres M, 2009, ECOLOGY, V90, P3566, DOI 10.1890/08-1823.1
   Demanèche S, 2001, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V67, P293, DOI 10.1128/AEM.67.1.293-299.2001
   Direito SOL, 2012, FEMS MICROBIOL ECOL, V81, P111, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01325.x
   Dommain R, 2020, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2020.00218
   Epp LS, 2015, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V117, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.03.027
   Foster NR, 2022, ECOL EVOL, V12, DOI 10.1002/ece3.8816
   Freeman C. L., 2023, Environmental DNA, V5, P1
   Friese A, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22453-0
   Friese A, 2017, LIMNOL OCEANOGR-METH, V15, P200, DOI 10.1002/lom3.10159
   Garnier J, 2021, BRAZ J GEOL, V51, DOI 10.1590/2317-4889202120200092
   GREGORY PH, 1978, PURE APPL GEOPHYS, V116, P309, DOI 10.1007/BF01636888
   Haberle SG, 2006, J ECOL, V94, P987, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01140.x
   Hamilton R, 2019, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V224, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.105929
   Hamilton R, 2019, REV PALAEOBOT PALYNO, V263, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2019.01.012
   Hasberg AKM, 2019, SEDIMENTOLOGY, V66, P675, DOI 10.1111/sed.12503
   Hope G, 2001, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V171, P129, DOI 10.1016/S0031-0182(01)00243-7
   Hopkins Helen C. Fortune, 1994, Kew Bulletin, V49, P181, DOI 10.2307/4110261
   Inagaki F, 2015, SCIENCE, V349, P420, DOI 10.1126/science.aaa6882
   Kazakou E, 2008, BIOL REV, V83, P495, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00051.x
   Keler P.J.A., 2002, Blumea Supplement, V14, P1
   Kirkpatrick JB, 2016, GEOLOGY, V44, P615, DOI 10.1130/G37933.1
   Koop-Jakobsen K, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2021.669751
   Lasut M. T., 2009, The floristic study of herbaceous grasses in Sulawesi
   Lee C, 2017, INT J DATA MIN BIOIN, V19, P366, DOI 10.1504/IJDMB.2017.10012554
   Li K, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108303
   Liu SS, 2020, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2020.560243
   Mander L, 2014, INT J PLANT SCI, V175, P931, DOI 10.1086/677680
   Markesteijn L, 2007, AM J BOT, V94, P515, DOI 10.3732/ajb.94.4.515
   More KD, 2018, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V496, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.05.045
   Morlock MA, 2021, J QUATERNARY SCI, V36, P1040, DOI 10.1002/jqs.3338
   Morlock MA, 2019, J PALEOLIMNOL, V61, P279, DOI 10.1007/s10933-018-0059-3
   Morrissey J, 2009, CHEM REV, V109, P4553, DOI 10.1021/cr900112r
   Myers N, 2000, NATURE, V403, P853, DOI 10.1038/35002501
   Niemeyer B, 2017, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V17, pe46, DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12689
   Nijburg JW, 1997, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V63, P931, DOI 10.1128/AEM.63.3.931-937.1997
   Ollerton J, 2011, OIKOS, V120, P321, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x
   Orsi WD, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-05590-9
   Parducci L, 2017, NEW PHYTOL, V214, P924, DOI 10.1111/nph.14470
   Parducci L, 2015, PHILOS T R SOC B, V370, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2013.0382
   Parducci L, 2013, MOL ECOL, V22, P3511, DOI 10.1111/mec.12298
   Pastré D, 2006, LANGMUIR, V22, P6651, DOI 10.1021/la053387y
   Paus A, 2015, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V121, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.05.004
   Pedersen MW, 2013, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V75, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.06.006
   Pietramellara G, 2009, BIOL FERT SOILS, V45, P219, DOI [10.1007/s00374-006-0156-8, 10.1007/s00374-008-0345-8]
   Prasad MNV, 2003, ELECTRON J BIOTECHN, V6, P285, DOI 10.2225/vol6-issue3-fulltext-6
   Randlett ME, 2014, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V104, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.07.009
   Riaz T, 2011, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V39, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkr732
   Rohart F, 2017, PLOS COMPUT BIOL, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005752
   Russell JM, 2020, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V556, DOI 10.1016/j.palaeo.2020.109905
   Russell JM, 2016, SCI DRILL, V21, P29, DOI 10.5194/sd-21-29-2016
   Russell JM, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P5100, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1402373111
   Sheppard RY, 2021, GEOCHEM GEOPHY GEOSY, V22, DOI 10.1029/2020GC009582
   Sisk-Hackworth L, 2020, NAR GENOM BIOINFORM, V2, DOI 10.1093/nargab/lqaa079
   Stevenson J, 2018, TERRA AUSTRALIS, V48, P17
   Taberlet P, 2007, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V35, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkl938
   Vogel H, 2015, J PALEOLIMNOL, V54, P359, DOI 10.1007/s10933-015-9857-z
   Voldstad LH, 2020, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V234, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106207
   Vuillemin A, 2019, GEOLOGY, V47, P540, DOI 10.1130/G46100.1
   Vuillemin A, 2017, FRONT MICROBIOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01440
   Wang ZL, 2022, CHEMOSPHERE, V301, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134705
   Whitten A. J., 1988, The ecology of Sulawesi
   Wickham H., 2009, ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, DOI [10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3, 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4]
   Zimmermann HH, 2017, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V14, P575, DOI 10.5194/bg-14-575-2017
NR 90
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 12
U2 21
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1472-4677
EI 1472-4669
J9 GEOBIOLOGY
JI Geobiology
PD MAY
PY 2024
VL 22
IS 3
AR e12599
DI 10.1111/gbi.12599
PG 21
WC Biology; Environmental Sciences; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences &
   Ecology; Geology
GA QQ8W6
UT WOS:001222436900001
PM 38745401
OA hybrid, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Bauer, VM
   Scherrer, SC
AF Bauer, Victoria M.
   Scherrer, Simon C.
TI The observed evolution of sub-daily to multi-day heavy precipitation in
   Switzerland
SO ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE LETTERS
LA English
DT Article
DE Alps; climate change; daily and sub-daily; elevation dependency; heavy
   precipitation; observed trends; Switzerland
ID EXTREME PRECIPITATION; TRENDS; TEMPERATURE; EUROPE; RAINFALL; FREQUENCY;
   INTENSITY; CYCLONES; EVENTS
AB Heavy precipitation is a major natural hazard in the Alps. Understanding the possible changes due to climate change is a prerequisite for effective climate adaptation and protection. In this study, we revisit the long-term (1901-2023) evolution of daily and multi-day heavy precipitation intensity and frequency, discuss trends for sub-daily to multi-day events in the recent period 1981-2023 and investigate elevation dependencies in the complex topography of Switzerland. We analyze station measurements from MeteoSwiss' dense operational network covering the whole country and a wide range of elevation levels. We find that daily maximum precipitation and the frequency of precipitation events exceeding the 99th all-day percentile have increased since 1901 with a peak in the 1980s and decreases thereafter. For the recent period 1981-2023, positive trends in summer heavy precipitation intensity are detected for short (10-min to 3-h) events, but no changes are found for the frequency of these moderate extreme events. For longer (1- to 5-day) events on the other hand, decreases in intensity and frequency are found, especially for the winter half-year. We hypothesize that the opposing trends on the centennial (1901-2023) vs. decadal (1981-2023) time scales are caused by the interaction between thermodynamics, reflecting the primary influence of human-induced climate change, and the internal variability of atmospheric dynamics. Moreover, we observe a small negative elevation dependency of the daily long-term trends up to 2300 m above sea level. For the 1981-2023 trends, no strong elevation dependencies are found for sub-daily events. For daily events, we find small opposing negative summer and positive winter elevation dependencies for both intensities and frequencies. The reason for these tendencies remains unclear. Our results underscore the need to further investigate the interplay between climate change, internal variability of large-scale dynamics and elevation to better understand heavy precipitation variability in the complex Alpine terrain.
   Daily and multi-day heavy precipitation intensity and frequency have increased since 1901, mainly driven by anthropogenic climate change. Heavy precipitation peaks in the 1980s and subsequently shows a decrease in daily to multi-day heavy precipitation due to internal variability. Sub-daily summer heavy precipitation intensity has increased since 1981 with no changes in frequency. Trends in heavy precipitation show only small to no elevation dependencies. image
C1 [Bauer, Victoria M.; Scherrer, Simon C.] MeteoSwiss, Fed Off Meteorol & Climatol, Zurich, Switzerland.
   [Bauer, Victoria M.] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Atmospher & Climate Sci, Zurich, Switzerland.
C3 Federal Office of Meteorology & Climatology (MeteoSwiss); Swiss Federal
   Institutes of Technology Domain; ETH Zurich
RP Bauer, VM (corresponding author), Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Atmospher & Climate Sci, Zurich, Switzerland.
EM victoria.bauer@env.ethz.ch
RI Scherrer, Simon/A-8547-2008
OI Bauer, Victoria/0009-0000-9675-5958
CR Ban N, 2015, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V42, P1165, DOI 10.1002/2014GL062588
   Barbero R, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P974, DOI 10.1002/2016GL071917
   Begert M, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P65, DOI 10.1002/joc.1118
   Belleri L, 2023, INT J CLIMATOL, V43, P7003, DOI 10.1002/joc.8248
   Blanchet J, 2023, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V128, DOI 10.1029/2022JD038253
   Blanchet J, 2021, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V33, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2021.100356
   Brönnimann S, 2022, CLIM PAST, V18, P919, DOI 10.5194/cp-18-919-2022
   Brönnimann S, 2019, CLIM PAST, V15, P1395, DOI 10.5194/cp-15-1395-2019
   Cleveland W, 1992, Statistical models in S, P608, DOI [10.1201/9780203738535, DOI 10.1201/9780203738535]
   Donat MG, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P508, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2941, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2941]
   Forster K., 2022, ELSEVIER, P131, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-323-88456-3.00015-0, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-323-88456-3.00015-0]
   Fowler HJ, 2021, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V2, P107, DOI 10.1038/s43017-020-00128-6
   Frei C, 2001, J CLIMATE, V14, P1568, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<1568:DPOTIR>2.0.CO;2
   Fukutome S, 2015, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V120, P403, DOI 10.1007/s00704-014-1180-5
   Giorgi F, 2016, NAT GEOSCI, V9, P584, DOI [10.1038/ngeo2761, 10.1038/NGEO2761]
   Grose MR, 2019, CLIM DYNAM, V53, P3675, DOI 10.1007/s00382-019-04736-x
   Kotlarski S, 2023, CLIM DYNAM, V60, P65, DOI 10.1007/s00382-022-06303-3
   Lenderink G, 2008, NAT GEOSCI, V1, P511, DOI 10.1038/ngeo262
   Lundquist J, 2019, B AM METEOROL SOC, V100, P2473, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0001.1
   Maraun D, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014004
   Martinkova M, 2020, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/atmos11080786
   Molnar P, 2015, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V19, P1753, DOI 10.5194/hess-19-1753-2015
   Napoli A, 2023, INT J CLIMATOL, V43, P5813, DOI 10.1002/joc.8222
   O'Gorman PA, 2015, CURR CLIM CHANGE REP, V1, P49, DOI 10.1007/s40641-015-0009-3
   Ombadi M, 2023, NATURE, V619, P305, DOI 10.1038/s41586-023-06092-7
   Ossó A, 2022, CLIM DYNAM, V58, P487, DOI 10.1007/s00382-021-05917-3
   Palazzi E, 2019, CLIM DYNAM, V52, P2685, DOI 10.1007/s00382-018-4287-z
   Pepin NC, 2022, REV GEOPHYS, V60, DOI 10.1029/2020RG000730
   Rajczak J, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V118, P3610, DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50297
   Rüdisühli S, 2020, WEATHER CLIM DYNAM, V1, P675, DOI 10.5194/wcd-1-675-2020
   Saffioti C, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P8189, DOI 10.1002/2016GL069802
   Scherrer SC, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V121, P2626, DOI 10.1002/2015JD024634
   Scherrer SC, 2024, CLIM SERV, V33, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2023.100428
   Scherrer SC, 2011, METEOROL Z, V20, P397, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2011/0236
   Schroeer K, 2018, CLIM DYNAM, V50, P3981, DOI 10.1007/s00382-017-3857-9
   Serquet G, 2011, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V38, DOI 10.1029/2011GL046976
   Sinclair VA, 2023, WEATHER CLIM DYNAM, V4, P567, DOI 10.5194/wcd-4-567-2023
   Sinclair VA, 2020, WEATHER CLIM DYNAM, V1, P1, DOI 10.5194/wcd-1-1-2020
   Sippel S, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab86f2
   Westra S, 2014, REV GEOPHYS, V52, P522, DOI 10.1002/2014RG000464
   Westra S, 2013, J CLIMATE, V26, P3904, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00502.1
   Williams AIL, 2022, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V49, DOI 10.1029/2021GL096531
   WMO, 2009, WMO FIELD INTERCOMPA
   Wood RR, 2020, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V47, DOI 10.1029/2020GL089300
   Yettella V, 2017, CLIM DYNAM, V49, P1765, DOI 10.1007/s00382-016-3410-2
   Yue S, 2002, J HYDROL, V259, P254, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00594-7
   Zeder J, 2020, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V29, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2020.100266
NR 47
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 2
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1530-261X
J9 ATMOS SCI LETT
JI Atmos. Sci. Lett.
PD SEP
PY 2024
VL 25
IS 9
DI 10.1002/asl.1240
EA MAY 2024
PG 14
WC Geochemistry & Geophysics; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geochemistry & Geophysics; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA P8B9W
UT WOS:001227479600001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Vorobevskii, I
   Park, J
   Kim, D
   Barfus, K
   Kronenberg, R
AF Vorobevskii, Ivan
   Park, Jeongha
   Kim, Dongkyun
   Barfus, Klemens
   Kronenberg, Rico
TI Simulating sub-hourly rainfall data for current and future periods using
   two statistical disaggregation models: case studies from Germany and
   South Korea
SO HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES
LA English
DT Article
ID STOCHASTIC WEATHER GENERATOR; MERGING METHODS; CASCADE MODEL; RADAR;
   PRECIPITATION; RESOLUTION; REGIONALIZATION; PROSPECTS; IMPROVE; FIELDS
AB The simulation of fast-reacting hydrological systems often requires sub-hourly precipitation data to develop appropriate climate adaptation strategies and tools, i.e. upgrading drainage systems and reducing flood risks. However, these sub-hourly data are typically not provided by measurements and atmospheric models, and many statistical disaggregation tools are applicable only up to an hourly resolution.
   Here, two different models for the disaggregation of precipitation data from a daily to sub-hourly scale are presented. The first one is a conditional disaggregation model based on first-order Markov chains and copulas (WayDown) that keeps the input daily precipitation sums consistent within disaggregated time series. The second one is an unconditional rain generation model based on a double Poisson process (LetItRain) that does not reproduce the input daily values but rather generates time series with consistent rainfall statistics. Both approaches aim to reproduce observed precipitation statistics over different timescales.
   The developed models were validated using 10min radar data representing 10 climate stations in Germany and South Korea; thus, they cover various climate zones and precipitation systems. Various statistics were compared, including the mean, variance, autocorrelation, transition probabilities, and proportion of wet period. Additionally, extremes were examined, including the frequencies of different thresholds, extreme quantiles, and annual maxima. To account for the model uncertainties, 1000-year-equivalent ensembles were generated by both models for each study site. While both models successfully reproduced the observed statistics, WayDown was better (than LetItRain) at reproducing the ensemble median, showing strength with respect to precisely refining the coarse input data. In contrast, LetItRain produced rainfall with a greater ensemble variability, thereby capturing a variety of scenarios that may happen in reality. Both methods reproduced extremes in a similar manner: overestimation until a certain threshold of rainfall and underestimation thereafter.
   Finally, the models were applied to climate projection data. The change factors for various statistics and extremes were computed and compared between historical (radar) information and the climate projections at a daily and 10min scale. Both methods showed similar results for the respective stations and Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios. Several consistent trends, jointly confirmed by disaggregated and daily data, were found for the mean, variance, autocorrelation, and proportion of wet periods. Further, they presented similar behaviour with respect to annual maxima for the majority of the stations for both RCP scenarios in comparison to the daily scale (i.e. a similar systematic underestimation).
C1 [Vorobevskii, Ivan; Barfus, Klemens; Kronenberg, Rico] TUD Dresden Univ Technol, Inst Hydrol & Meteorol, Fac Environm Sci, Chair Meteorol, D-01737 Tharandt, Germany.
   [Park, Jeongha; Kim, Dongkyun] Hongik Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Seoul 04066, South Korea.
C3 Hongik University
RP Vorobevskii, I (corresponding author), TUD Dresden Univ Technol, Inst Hydrol & Meteorol, Fac Environm Sci, Chair Meteorol, D-01737 Tharandt, Germany.; Park, J (corresponding author), Hongik Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Seoul 04066, South Korea.
EM ivan.vorobevskii@tu-dresden.de; parkjungha1121@gmail.com
OI Vorobevskii, Ivan/0000-0002-4246-5290; Kim,
   Dongkyun/0000-0002-4222-7444; Kronenberg, Rico/0000-0001-7489-9061
FU Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst [2022R1A4A3032838]; National
   Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2021K2A9A2A15000179]
FX This research has been supported by the Deutscher Akademischer
   Austauschdienst (grant no. 2022R1A4A3032838) and the National Research
   Foundation of Korea (grant no. NRF-2021K2A9A2A15000179, FY2021).
CR Alfieri L, 2010, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V10, P149, DOI 10.5194/nhess-10-149-2010
   Arora VK, 2011, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V38, DOI 10.1029/2010GL046270
   Barnes S.L, 1964, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V3, P396, DOI [10.1175/1520-0450(1964)0032.0.CO;2,https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/apme/3/4/1520-045019640030396atfmdi20co2.xml, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1964)0032.0.CO;2, 10.1175/1520-0450(1964)003<0396:ATFMDI>2.0.CO;2, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1964)003<0396:ATFMDI>2.0.CO;2]
   Berne A, 2004, J HYDROL, V299, P166, DOI [10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.002, 10.1016/S0022-1694(04)00363-4]
   Chan SC, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/094024
   Cowpertwait PSP, 1996, J HYDROL, V175, P17, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)80004-7
   Dao DA, 2022, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V36, P735, DOI 10.1007/s00477-021-02049-2
   Dao DA, 2020, J HYDRO-ENVIRON RES, V32, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.jher.2020.08.001
   De Luca DL, 2021, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/hydrology8020076
   Dao DA, 2020, J HYDROL, V584, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124704
   Dyrrdal AV, 2018, INT J CLIMATOL, V38, P1661, DOI 10.1002/joc.5287
   Fatichi S, 2011, ADV WATER RESOUR, V34, P448, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.12.013
   Ghimire GR, 2022, ADV WATER RESOUR, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2022.104145
   Goudenhoofdt E, 2009, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V13, P195, DOI 10.5194/hess-13-195-2009
   Han J, 2021, KSCE J CIV ENG, V25, P356, DOI 10.1007/s12205-020-0526-z
   HILAB, Rainfall Modeling
   Iles CE, 2020, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V13, P5583, DOI 10.5194/gmd-13-5583-2020
   Jasper-Tonnies J., 2012, URBAN CHALLENGES RAI
   Jung C, 2019, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/atmos10120737
   Kaczmarska J, 2014, HYDROLOG SCI J, V59, P1972, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2014.925558
   Kim D., 2024, Zenodo code, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.10560108, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.10560108]
   Kim D, 2020, J HYDROL, V589, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125150
   Kim D, 2017, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V31, P1023, DOI 10.1007/s00477-016-1234-6
   Kim D, 2016, J HYDRO-ENVIRON RES, V11, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.jher.2014.10.004
   Kim D, 2013, TERR ATMOS OCEAN SCI, V24, P421, DOI 10.3319/TAO.2012.11.12.01(Hy)
   Kim Jin-Uk, 2022, [Journal of Climate Change Research, 한국기후변화학회지], V13, P339, DOI 10.15531/KSCCR.2022.13.3.339
   Kim MK, 2016, ASIA-PAC J ATMOS SCI, V52, P79, DOI 10.1007/s13143-016-0010-3
   Kim TJ, 2021, J HYDROL, V593, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125790
   Kirsch B, 2019, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V58, P2259, DOI 10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0077.1
   Kossieris P, 2018, J HYDROL, V556, P980, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.015
   Kottek M, 2006, METEOROL Z, V15, P259, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130
   Koutsoyiannis D, 2001, J HYDROL, V246, P109, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00363-8
   Kreienkamp F, 2019, CLIM DYNAM, V52, P991, DOI 10.1007/s00382-018-4276-2
   Kronenberg R, 2015, METEOROL APPL, V22, P636, DOI 10.1002/met.1498
   Licznar P, 2011, ATMOS RES, V99, P563, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.12.014
   Liu Y, 2021, J HYDROL, V603, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126820
   Lombardo F, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P4586, DOI 10.1002/2017WR020529
   Maraun D, 2010, REV GEOPHYS, V48, DOI 10.1029/2009RG000314
   Meierdiercks KL, 2010, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V46, P932, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00465.x
   Meredith EP, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6787
   Meredith EP, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P7680, DOI 10.1029/2019GL082385
   Müller H, 2018, J HYDROL, V556, P847, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.031
   Müller H, 2015, J HYDROL ENG, V20, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001195
   Müller-Thomy H, 2020, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V24, P169, DOI 10.5194/hess-24-169-2020
   Müller-Thomy H, 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V22, P5259, DOI 10.5194/hess-22-5259-2018
   NASA JPL, 2013, NASA Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Global 1 arc second distributed by NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, DOI DOI 10.5067/MEASURES/SRTM/SRTMGL1.003
   O'Neill BC, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P3461, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016
   Ochoa-Rodriguez S, 2019, WATER RESOUR RES, V55, P6356, DOI 10.1029/2018WR023332
   Oh MinKwan Oh MinKwan, 2016, Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, V49, P981, DOI 10.3741/jkwra.2016.49.12.981
   Papalexiou SM, 2018, ADV WATER RESOUR, V115, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.02.013
   Park J, 2021, J HYDROL, V598, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126296
   Park S, 2014, ATMOS-KOREA, V24, P77, DOI 10.14191/Atmos.2014.24.1.077
   Peleg N, 2017, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V9, P1595, DOI 10.1002/2016MS000854
   Pidoto R, 2023, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V27, P3957, DOI 10.5194/hess-27-3957-2023
   Prein AF, 2015, REV GEOPHYS, V53, P323, DOI 10.1002/2014RG000475
   Pui A, 2012, J HYDROL, V470, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.041
   Ramly S, 2020, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V34, P3113, DOI 10.1007/s11269-020-02595-4
   RODRIGUEZ-ITURBE I, 1988, PROC R SOC LON SER-A, V417, P283, DOI 10.1098/rspa.1988.0061
   Schär C, 2020, B AM METEOROL SOC, V101, pE567, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0167.1
   Segers J, 2017, J MULTIVARIATE ANAL, V155, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.jmva.2016.11.010
   Sellar AA, 2019, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V11, P4513, DOI 10.1029/2019MS001739
   Semenov MA, 1997, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V35, P397, DOI 10.1023/A:1005342632279
   Semenov MA, 1998, CLIMATE RES, V10, P95, DOI 10.3354/cr010095
   Siggia AD., 2004, Proc. European Conf. on Radar in Meteorology and Hydrology, V2, P421
   Sinclair S, 2005, ATMOS SCI LETT, V6, P19, DOI 10.1002/asl.85
   Sohn W, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106774
   Takhellambam BS, 2022, SCI DATA, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41597-022-01304-7
   Verdin A, 2018, J HYDROL, V556, P835, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.036
   Vorobevskii I., 2023, HydroShare data set and code, DOI [10.4211/hs.9322-1ef25e04822a759c515795642e1, DOI 10.4211/HS.9322-1EF25E04822A759C515795642E1]
   Vorobevskii Ivan, 2024, Zenodo, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.10559432
   Vorobevskii I, 2020, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/hydrology7020035
   Wang WT, 2021, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V13, P2945, DOI 10.5194/essd-13-2945-2021
   Wijayarathne D, 2021, J HYDROMETEOROL, V22, P2033, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-20-0267.1
   Wijayarathne D, 2020, J HYDROMETEOROL, V21, P1847, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-20-0033.1
   Winterrath T., 2018, DWD data set, DOI [10.5676/DWD/RADKLIMYWV2017.002, DOI 10.5676/DWD/RADKLIMYWV2017.002]
   Winterrath T., 2017, BERICHTE DTSCH WETTE
NR 76
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 1
U2 1
PU COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
PI GOTTINGEN
PA BAHNHOFSALLEE 1E, GOTTINGEN, 37081, GERMANY
SN 1027-5606
EI 1607-7938
J9 HYDROL EARTH SYST SC
JI Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
PD JAN 31
PY 2024
VL 28
IS 2
BP 391
EP 416
DI 10.5194/hess-28-391-2024
PG 26
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Water Resources
GA A3E3V
UT WOS:001281391500001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Mao, TB
   Li, Q
AF Mao, Tianbin
   Li, Qian
TI Research on the relationship between the formation of local construction
   culture and geographical environment based on adaptability analysis
SO JOURNAL OF KING SAUD UNIVERSITY SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptability analysis; Local construction; Cultural formation;
   Geographic environment
ID RESILIENCE; STRATEGIES
AB Objectives: Since the natural ecology and geographical environment are the basis for the formation of local architecture, based on the adaptability analysis, the article analyzes the natural ecology and geographical environment that affect the creation of regional local architecture, and analyzes the adaptability of traditional architecture to natural ecology and the impact of traditional culture. Methods: The summary of the response methods is to try to find the substantive connotation of vernacular architecture in order to provide basic theoretical support for contemporary vernacular architecture creation. At the same time, combined with the characteristics of the times of the contemporary area, it proposes a typical site design adaptability analysis, a suitability climate adaptability analysis and a construction adaptability analysis returning to the local culture. And for the coastal cultural and historical background of the region, the development of regional ancient towns is discussed, and the location of regional coastal ancient towns is analyzed for the coastal environment.
   Results: The final selected model was a weighted average based on Akaike weights of 71 logistic candidate models that included all the variables in these 71 candidate models. The importance weights of variables are the criteria for assessing the impact and contribution rate of environmental factors on survival and dispersal, and are the sum of the Akaike weights of all candidate models containing a given predictor variable. The connection between households basically uses the scattered water of the building, does not occupy the foundation, and basically does not damage the landform. The entrance to the building is determined by the terrain on the one hand, and the road on the other, and is generally set on one side of the road. Finally, the coastal environmental background and historical and cultural background of regional ancient towns are summarized, and the research roughly explores the region. Conclusions: At the end of the article, through the interpretation of actual cases, it provides certain evidence and explanations for adaptability analysis, and expresses the design ideas of comprehensive trade-offs in the process of adaptability analysis, in order to provide contemporary local architectural design for the extensive urban and rural construction in the region with theories and adaptability analysis. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
C1 [Mao, Tianbin; Li, Qian] Chengdu Univ, 2025 Chengluo Ave, Chengdu 610106, Sichuan, Peoples R China.
C3 Chengdu University
RP Mao, TB (corresponding author), Chengdu Univ, 2025 Chengluo Ave, Chengdu 610106, Sichuan, Peoples R China.
EM maotb2021@163.com
FU Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of Education
   Department of Sichuan Province - Sichuan Grassroots Public Cultural
   Service Research Center general Project [JY2021B02]
FX Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of Education
   Department of Sichuan Province - Sichuan Grassroots Public Cultural
   Service Research Center general Project in 2021, Project number:
   JY2021B02.
CR Adamson GCD, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V48, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.003
   Ahrens CW, 2020, ECOL EVOL, V10, P232, DOI 10.1002/ece3.5890
   Balacescu A, 2021, AMFITEATRU ECON, V23, P683, DOI 10.24818/EA/2021/58/683
   Bardosh KL, 2017, INFECT DIS POVERTY, V6, DOI 10.1186/s40249-017-0375-2
   Cafer A, 2019, COMMUNITY DEV, V50, P201, DOI 10.1080/15575330.2019.1575442
   Cai YP, 2020, PLANT BIOTECHNOL J, V18, P298, DOI 10.1111/pbi.13199
   Chen XH, 2020, HABITAT INT, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102250
   Chowdhury RB, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V150, P371, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.060
   de Araujo MJ, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V454, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117631
   Derville S, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P1466, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14563
   Dunets AN, 2019, ENTREP SUSTAIN ISS, V7, P1217, DOI 10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2(29)
   Estaji H, 2017, NEW ARCH, V4, P37, DOI 10.14621/tna.20170204
   Ferro-Azcona H, 2019, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V173, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.01.005
   García-Solache M, 2019, CLIN MICROBIOL REV, V32, DOI 10.1128/CMR.00058-18
   Goh K, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P2222, DOI 10.1177/0042098018807306
   Hardy RD, 2017, GEOFORUM, V87, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.10.005
   Hariharakrishnan J., 2021, J ISMAC, V3, P69, DOI DOI 10.36548/JISMAC.2021.2.001
   Healey P., 2002, URBAN GOVERNANCE I C, P204
   Helgadóttir A, 2018, J AGRON CROP SCI, V204, P493, DOI 10.1111/jac.12273
   Li Y, 2020, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V41, P921, DOI 10.1002/smj.3098
   Liu JX, 2018, WATER RES, V133, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2018.01.014
   Okamuro H, 2019, REG STUD, V53, P803, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2018.1500687
   Oladigbolu JO, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11184959
   Pérez-Fargallo A, 2020, ENERGY SUSTAIN DEV, V58, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.esd.2020.07.009
   Qin ZJ, 2019, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V124, P3317, DOI 10.1029/2018JC014648
   Reyes-García V, 2016, CURR ANTHROPOL, V57, P761, DOI 10.1086/689307
   Roncoli Carla., 2009, Anthropology and Climate Change: From Encounters to Actions, P87
   Ruiz X.F.Q, 2018, BRIT FOOD J
   Shen XX, 2016, WORLD DEV, V87, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.06.010
   Szareski VJ, 2018, PESQUI AGROPECU BRAS, V53, P727, DOI [10.1590/s0100-204x2018000600009, 10.1590/S0100-204X2018000600009]
   Tan XH, 2016, HABITAT INT, V56, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.06.006
   Tang CL, 2018, J GEOGR SCI, V28, P685, DOI 10.1007/s11442-018-1499-4
   Ten YP, 2021, EUR J CONTEMP EDUC, V10, P159, DOI 10.13187/ejced.2021.1.159
   Thomas K, 2019, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V10, DOI 10.1002/wcc.565
   Wang H, 2019, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V103, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.005
   Wang WJ, 2021, J RURAL STUD, V83, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.02.006
   Wang WM, 2019, FRONT GENET, V10, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2019.00300
   Zarrinabadi N, 2022, INNOV LANG LEARN TEA, V16, P249, DOI 10.1080/17501229.2021.1962888
   Zhang J, 2020, APPL ENERG, V261, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114362
   Zheng RF, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10.3390/en13061428
NR 40
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 9
U2 23
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1018-3647
EI 2213-686X
J9 J KING SAUD UNIV SCI
JI J. King Saud Univ. Sci.
PD JAN
PY 2023
VL 35
IS 1
AR 102387
DI 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102387
EA NOV 2022
PG 7
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA 8J5XF
UT WOS:000922487500001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT B
AU Ligon, K
AF Ligon, Khalil
BE Doucet, B
TI Reconstructing Detroit: the resilient city
SO WHY DETROIT MATTERS: DECLINE, RENEWAL AND HOPE IN A DIVIDED CITY
LA English
DT Article; Book Chapter
AB In this chapter, Khalil Ligon discusses the role in which non-municipally led community development strategies can play a role in revitalizing Detroit. She argues that Detroiters who have persisted and remained in the city despite all its problems should play a central role in shaping its future. Rather than focusing on "resilient" cities, Ligon sees resilience coming from Detroiters themselves. In the absence of any strong and visionary leadership, they have taken matters into their own hands. Such sentiments featured strongly in Kimberley Kinder's chapter (Chapter Six) on do-it-yourself urbanism and will be a central focus of many of the conversations in Section Three. What sets Ligon's chapter apart is her ability to easily move between the two worlds of planning and the grassroots community initiatives she describes in this chapter.
   Ligon's approach to urban planning, design, and development has been framed by the experience of witnessing her own neighborhood's dramatic decline. She grew up (and still resides in) the area near the Coleman A. Young International Airport in Northeast Detroit (see Chapter One). The first time we met, she described how the closure of McNichols Road by the airport severed her community in two, separating people from businesses, schools, and churches. She then saw first-hand the effects that such a planning decision had on her community.Today, she is one of the few residents still living on her street. As a result of seeing this transformation, her professional life has been dedicated to championing community planning efforts such as the ones she describes in this chapter, some of which she has been personally and professionally involved with. They offer opportunities for shared and inclusive visions and stand in contrast to the developer- and corporate-led projects in Downtown. Her central message is that city officials need to listen to, and empower these community initiatives if Detroit is to avoid repeating past mistakes and injustices.
   Khalil Ligon is chief executive officer of Vista Vantage Consulting Group, L3C, an urban planning and environmental design firm based in Detroit. She has developed award-winning community plans and leads a variety of sustainability initiatives to advance green infrastructure, climate adaptation, and food systems development. Khalil is active throughout the community, serving on various boards, including the Detroit Eastside Community Collaborative (DECC), the US Green Building Council, and the Detroit Greenways Coalition. She holds a master's degree in urban planning from Wayne State University.
C1 [Ligon, Khalil] Vista Vantage Consulting Grp L3C, Detroit, MI 48213 USA.
   [Ligon, Khalil] Detroit Eastside Community Collaborat, Detroit, MI 48215 USA.
   [Ligon, Khalil] US Green Bldg Council, Washington, DC 20037 USA.
   [Ligon, Khalil] Detroit Greenways Coalit, Detroit, MI 48232 USA.
RP Ligon, K (corresponding author), Vista Vantage Consulting Grp L3C, Detroit, MI 48213 USA.; Ligon, K (corresponding author), Detroit Eastside Community Collaborat, Detroit, MI 48215 USA.; Ligon, K (corresponding author), US Green Bldg Council, Washington, DC 20037 USA.; Ligon, K (corresponding author), Detroit Greenways Coalit, Detroit, MI 48232 USA.
NR 0
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 3
PU POLICY PRESS
PI BRISTOL
PA UNIV BRISTOL, 4TH FLOOR, BEACON HOUSE, QUEENS ROAD, BRISTOL, BS8 1QU,
   ENGLAND
BN 978-1-4473-2787-5; 978-1-4473-2789-9; 978-1-4473-2786-8
PY 2017
BP 221
EP 232
PG 12
WC Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary; Urban Studies
WE Book Citation Index – Social Sciences & Humanities (BKCI-SSH)
SC Social Sciences - Other Topics; Urban Studies
GA BJ4XO
UT WOS:000425584600013
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Van Loon-Steensma, JM
   Kok, M
AF Van Loon-Steensma, Jantsje M.
   Kok, Matthijs
BE Lang, M
   Klijn, F
   Samuels, P
TI Risk reduction by combining nature values with flood protection?
SO 3RD EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT (FLOODRISK 2016)
SE E3S Web of Conferences
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk)
CY OCT 17-21, 2016
CL Lyon, FRANCE
ID SALT-MARSH; WAVE ATTENUATION; TRADE-OFFS; DISSIPATION; COAST; FIELD
AB In the Netherlands, the concept of a multifunctional dike has already often been implemented, and has been identified as a promising climate adaptation measure. In a multifunctional dike, functions like urban development, transport infrastructure, recreation, agriculture or nature are deliberately combined with its primary flood protection function. This means that the design must be based on the requirements and life span of all different functions, while in a monofunctional dike only the flood protection function is considered. By accommodating other functions, a multifunctional dike may easier fit into, or even contribute to the quality of the landscape. Moreover, these other functions may help in financing the flood protection works, but governance is more complicated. To avoid costly adjustments forthcoming from changed safety standards, incorporation of multiple functions can require a more "robust" flood defence than a monofunctional flood defence. A robust flood defence can withstand more extreme situations than required by the present safety standards, and has a substantially lower flooding probability. Therefore, a multifunctional dike may be attractive in view of the uncertainties regarding the effects of climate change and a changing world. Moreover, it will result in reduced flood risk. As part of the Dutch Delta programme, several explorative studies on multifunctional dikes were initiated. Most studies focused on urban areas, but also in the rural area interest emerged for multifunctional dikes, e.g. for the integration of salt marshes into the flood defences. Marshes provide valuable habitat for vegetation and invertebrate species, and are important for wading birds. Furthermore, under condition of abundant sediment availability they can keep pace with sea level rise. Explorative modelling results indicate that vegetated forelands affect wave heights, even under extreme conditions. However, the inclusion of a vegetated foreland into the dike design does not automatically mean that nature values and flood protection are well integrated. Flood protection imposes rather different requirements on the extent and features of marshes than nature conservation and development. Wave damping is most effective with a high and stable marsh, while nature thrives with dynamic processes and differences in elevation. Therefore, only a design that allows natural marsh dynamics and includes different marsh zones could combine nature values with flood protection. In practice, this means a dike design with an uncertain foreland, that offers space for natural processes. The uncertainty in foreland development reduces the possible flood risk reduction. In our paper we describe the critical points of interest concerning risk reduction in this system.
C1 [Van Loon-Steensma, Jantsje M.] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Earth Syst Sci Grp, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands.
   [Kok, Matthijs] Delft Univ Technol, POB 5048, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands.
C3 Wageningen University & Research; Delft University of Technology
RP Van Loon-Steensma, JM (corresponding author), Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Earth Syst Sci Grp, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands.
EM jantsje.vanloon@wur.nl
OI van Loon-Steensma, Jantsje M./0000-0002-6181-7829
CR Adam P., 1990, Saltmarsh Ecology
   Allen JRL, 2000, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V19, P1155, DOI 10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00034-7
   Anderson ME, 2014, COAST ENG, V83, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2013.10.004
   [Anonymous], 2011, US ARMY CORPS ENG
   [Anonymous], 2011 DELT PROGR WORK
   [Anonymous], 2008, WORK TOG WAT LIV LAN
   Bakker J., 2005, Wadden Sea Quality Status Report, V19, P163
   Barbier EB, 2011, ECOL MONOGR, V81, P169, DOI 10.1890/10-1510.1
   Borsje BW, 2011, ECOL ENG, V37, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.11.027
   Bouma TJ, 2005, ECOLOGY, V86, P2187, DOI 10.1890/04-1588
   Bouma TJ, 2014, COAST ENG, V87, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2013.11.014
   Brampton A. H., 1992, P115
   Cooper NJ, 2005, J COASTAL RES, V21, P28, DOI 10.2112/01002.1
   Costanza R, 2008, AMBIO, V37, P241, DOI 10.1579/0044-7447(2008)37[241:TVOCWF]2.0.CO;2
   De Bruijn K.M, 2008, T140801 FLOODSITE
   de Groot R, 2006, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V75, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.016
   Deltaprogramma Waddengebied, 2011, DELT 2012 PROBL WADD
   Dijkema K.S., 2001, Van landaanwinning naar kwelderwerken
   French P.W., 2002, Coastal defences: processes, problems and solutions, DOI [10.4324/9780203187630, DOI 10.4324/9780203187630]
   Gedan KB, 2009, ANNU REV MAR SCI, V1, P117, DOI 10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163930
   Gedan KB, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V106, P7, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-0003-7
   Haasnoot M, 2011, SUSTAIN DEV, V19, P369, DOI 10.1002/sd.438
   Hall J, 2008, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V6, P85, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2008.9635339
   Hu Z, J COASTAL RES
   JONES CG, 1994, OIKOS, V69, P373, DOI 10.2307/3545850
   KING SE, 1995, MAR POLLUT BULL, V30, P180, DOI 10.1016/0025-326X(94)00173-7
   Klijn F., 2013, EXPLAINING DIFFERENC
   Klijn F, 2015, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V20, P845, DOI 10.1007/s11027-015-9638-z
   Laursen K., 2010, WADDEN SEA ECOSYSTEM, V30
   Mens MJP, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P1121, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.003
   Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, 2007, HYDR RENDV PRIM WAT
   Möller I, 2014, NAT GEOSCI, V7, P727, DOI [10.1038/ngeo2251, 10.1038/NGEO2251]
   Möller I, 2006, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V69, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2006.05.003
   Möller I, 2001, J CHART INST WATER E, V15, P109
   Möller I, 1999, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V49, P411, DOI 10.1006/ecss.1999.0509
   MOLLER I, 2002, P 28 INT C COAST ENG, V1, P651
   Resilient Coasts Initiative, 2009, RES COASTS BLUEPR AC
   Rijkswaterstaat, 2007, EXPERTISE NETWERK WA
   Shepard CC, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0027374
   Smale A.J., 2014, Invloed kwelderbreedte op veiligheidsopgave
   Van Goor MA, 2003, MAR GEOL, V202, P211, DOI 10.1016/S0025-3227(03)00262-7
   Van Loon-Steensma JM, 2015, APPL VEG SCI, V18, P674, DOI 10.1111/avsc.12182
   van Loon-Steensma JM, 2014, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V44, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.06.009
   van Loon-Steensma JM, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P320, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.007
   Van Loon-Steensma JM, 2013, J COASTAL RES, V29, P783, DOI 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-12-00123.1
   Venema J.E., 2012, Kwelders en dijkveiligheid in het Waddengebied
   VNK, 2015, NAT FLOOD RISK AN NE
   Vuik N., COASTAL ENG UNPUB
   Wamsley TV, 2009, NAT HAZARDS, V51, P207, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9378-z
   Yang SL, 2012, ESTUAR COAST, V35, P169, DOI 10.1007/s12237-011-9424-4
   Ysebaert T, 2011, WETLANDS, V31, P1043, DOI 10.1007/s13157-011-0240-1
NR 51
TC 7
Z9 8
U1 1
U2 18
PU E D P SCIENCES
PI CEDEX A
PA 17 AVE DU HOGGAR PARC D ACTIVITES COUTABOEUF BP 112, F-91944 CEDEX A,
   FRANCE
SN 2267-1242
J9 E3S WEB CONF
PY 2016
VL 7
AR 13003
DI 10.1051/e3sconf/20160713003
PG 10
WC Engineering, Environmental; Engineering, Civil; Environmental Sciences;
   Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Regional & Urban Planning; Water
   Resources
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S); Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Science &amp; Humanities (CPCI-SSH)
SC Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geology; Public
   Administration; Water Resources
GA BG8GU
UT WOS:000392270100144
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Montero, JL
   Salas, MC
   Díaz, JG
   Guzmán, M
   Heredia, E
AF Montero, J. L.
   Salas, M. C.
   Diaz, J. G.
   Guzman, M.
   Heredia, E.
BE Tellez, FA
   Rodriguez, AM
   Sancho, IM
   Robinson, MV
   RuizAltisent, M
   Ballesteros, FR
   Hernando, ECC
TI Water use evaluation in green roofs applied to bioclimatic architecture
   in arid and semi-arid Mediterranean areas
SO VII CONGRESO IBERICO DE AGROINGENIERIA Y CIENCIAS HORTICOLAS: INNOVAR Y
   PRODUCIR PARA EL FUTURO. INNOVATING AND PRODUCING FOR THE FUTURE
LA Spanish
DT Proceedings Paper
CT 7th Iberian Congress of Agricultural Engineering and Horticultural
   Sciences
CY AUG 26-29, 2013
CL Madrid, SPAIN
SP Sociedad Espanola Agroingenieria, Sociedad Espanola Ciencias Horticolas, Associacao Portuguesa Horticultura, Secc Especializada Ingn Rural Sociedad Ciencias Agrarias Portugal, Univ Politecnica Madrid, Escuela Tecnica Superior Ingenieros Agronomos Madrid, Escuela Univ Ingenieros Tecnicos Agricolas Madrid, Campus Excelencia Internac, Comis Espanola Ingn Rural, European Soc Agr
DE temperature; irrigation; extensive roofs
AB There is growing interest in using the vegetation in the urban environment as an element that contributes to climate control. Traditionally, in warm areas, vegetation has been used to protect from direct sun lowering the temperature and increasing humidity. In Spain and more specifically in the southeastern Spanish and areas around the Mediterranean, the concept of urban "naturation" is starting to enter, although there are numerous barriers to using vegetation as an element for passive climate control in buildings. In the Mediterranean regions (arid and semi-arid), extreme weather conditions, and the scarcity and poor quality of water, requires to minimize the use of irrigation water for gardening. To ensure the survival of the facades and ground cover is necessary to optimize water consumption. The aim of this study was to quantify the water needs of green roofs planted with native and naturalized plants located in the southeastern Spanish to ensure their survival, and to know the effect on temperature for their use as insulation of roofs of buildings. The water consumption can be minimized by tailoring the dose to water demand system. To achieve the following parameters were considered: the incorporation of drip irrigation, the dose calculation based on the local evapotranspiration, the use of flora adapted to climatic conditions (native and naturalized) and the physical characteristics of the material used as substrate (water reserve). Three watering treatments were applied according to three coefficients as a function of evapotranspiration and water retention capacity of the substrate. The experiment results indicate that green roof gardening in our latitudes demands considerable water consumption, more than 200 mm year(-1). This means that the implementation of irrigation systems in the design of an extensive green roof must be considered, and it could be consider that 52% v/v minimum substrate water content, even when using native and xeric plants naturalized, to ensure the sustainability and survival of roofs. With regard to the capability of controlling the temperature of the covers, the results show that significant differences were observed in maximum temperatures, being lower below the landscaped surface, however the minimum temperatures are not significantly affected.
C1 [Montero, J. L.] Grinea, Madrid, Spain.
   [Salas, M. C.; Guzman, M.; Heredia, E.] Univ Almeria, Dept Agron, Almeria, Spain.
   [Diaz, J. G.] Univ Ctr Occidental Lisandro Alvarado, Dept Fitotecnia, Huetamo De Nunez, Venezuela.
C3 Universidad de Almeria
RP Montero, JL (corresponding author), Grinea, Madrid, Spain.
EM jlmp@grinea.com; csalas@ual.es; josegregoriodiaz@ucla.edu.ve;
   mguzman@ual.es
RI del Carmen Salas, Maria/L-3148-2014; Guzman, Miguel/H-6111-2011
CR Benvenuti Stefano, 2010, Urban Ecosystems, V13, P349, DOI 10.1007/s11252-010-0124-9
   BLANCA G., 2009, Flora Vascular de Andalucia Oriental
   Costello L.R., 2000, GUIDE ESTIMATING IRR
   Dunnett N., 2008, Planting green roofs and living walls
   Getter Kristin L., 2008, Urban Ecosystems, V11, P361, DOI 10.1007/s11252-008-0052-0
   IFAPA, 2011, I INV FORM AGR PESQ
   Montero JL, 2010, ACTA HORTIC, V881, P355
   Salas MC, 2010, ACTA HORTIC, V881, P421
   TEERI JA, 1986, PLANT PHYSIOL, V81, P678, DOI 10.1104/pp.81.2.678
NR 9
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 8
PU FUNDACION GENERAL UNIV POLITECNICA MADRID
PI MADRID
PA C/PASTOR, 3, MADRID, CP 28003, SPAIN
BN 978-84-695-9055-3
PY 2014
BP 1389
EP 1394
PG 6
WC Agricultural Engineering; Horticulture
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Agriculture
GA BE8NU
UT WOS:000376620800235
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Miola, I
   Junqueira, GD
   Prol, F
   Vecchione-Gonçalves, M
   Ferrando, T
   Herrera, H
AF Miola, Iage
   Junqueira, Gabriela de Oliveira
   Prol, Flavio
   Vecchione-Goncalves, Marcela
   Ferrando, Tomaso
   Herrera, Hector
TI Green bonds in the world-ecology: capital, nature and power in the
   financialized expansion of the forestry industry in Brazil
SO RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES-MADRID
LA Spanish
DT Article
DE Green economy; green bonds; financialization of nature; forestry
   industry; world-ecology
ID POLITICAL-ECONOMY; CLIMATE FINANCE; CHALLENGES
AB The 2008 financial crisis opened the doors of green capitalism as a financially sound approach to saving the planet from the worst effects of the climate emergency. The emphasis on the role of finance in promoting "green growth" has permeated mainstream political,academic and business approaches to climate change adaptation and mitigation, assuming multiple forms - from the carbon markets of the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement, to the Environmental, Social and Governance taxonomy for "green" investments, to the proliferation of sustainable labels in several economic sectors. The present article offers a critical appraisal of one of the most prominent arguments that upholds the idea that it is possible and desirable to achieve sustainability and economic growth through finance: green bonds.
   Green bonds are debt instruments whose proceeds are earmarked to fund projects with supposedly environmental benefits. After some years in the background, they now occupy a central position in the green recovery narrative and political framework all over the world. Most of the academic literature tends to naturalize green bonds as an eminently technical solution to reconcile economic growth and environmental sustainability. Filling an epistemological gap, the present article leverages a world-ecology approach to embed the financial phenomenon of green bonds within the broader picture of the capitalist political economy and the expansion of its ecological frontier. In light of the ongoing experiences that the authors have been following in the Brazilian legal,financial and political context, the article unpacks and makes sense of green bonds as a tool in the hands of climate finance that reproduces global patterns of North-South uneven development and the shifting of ecological costs.
   To test the potential of the "interpretative framework" offered by a world-ecology approach, we mobilize it in the concrete case of green bonds issuances directed to fund the forestry sector in Brazil. Aware that the current phenomenon only represents a blip in comparison to the largeer temporal (the longue duree) and spatial (the world system) scales usually deployed by world-ecology, we nonetheless discuss how the ideological, technical and power dynamics behind the issuance of green bonds unleash capital accumulation, produce a financialized and subordinated construction of nature, and entail an institutional arrangement.
   The article is organized around 3 main sections. After the introduction, section 1 describes green bonds as one of the most fashionable financial topics of the moment, and one that promotes a shift in discourses towards the need of actively building a "green economy". Although from a legal standpoint green bonds embody no significant difference from regular bonds, our focus is to describe the promises around them, the current (private) governance structure, and the trends in the issuance of these debt instruments both in the Global North and South, with a specific focus on the case of Brazil.
   In section 2, we look at the operations of green bonds emissions on the ground, i.e. taking as an example the context of green debt underpinning the Brazilian forestry sector. The analysis reveals how the emissions, made predominantly by large multinational companies actively present on the global market, feed off great efforts deployed by both the public and the private sector in constructing an image of the sector as a key player in the emergent "bioeconomy" and in the strengthening of Brazil's goals in the Paris Agreement. However,we describe how green bond revenues that are officially committed to the implementation of "sustainable management of forests" are associated with the expansion of the ecological frontier in the Brazilian territory, stretching the boundaries of the area dedicated to tree plantations and amplifying social and environmental tensions. The backstage of the emissions shows how capital accumulation through green bonds is associated with the coproduction of nature for the purpose of accumulation, generating concerns that are often diluted or transformed into procedural requirements. Debt generated by the subscription of green bonds, we argue, is not only financial, but also social and ecological.
   In section 3, we put forward that for private accumulation to be successful, green bonds in the forestry sector demand an institutional arrangement that combines state support and private governance of debt in its financial, social and ecological dimensions. Rather than being the result of an idealized and spontaneous market, a set of institutional transformations have to be considered in order to comprehend the feasibility of green bonds in the Brazilian forestry sector. We thus describe the historic connection between forestry and the state, the endless public incentives to put nature to work, the functional adaptations of the Brazilian environmental legislation and the regulation concerning the demarcation, access and use of land. In this context, we argue that green bonds add yet a new institutional layer to the process of creating and validating specific forms of nature, through a governance structure that dilutes the tensions between the promise of environmental benefits and its concrete negative social and environmental impacts.
   We conclude the article by reassembling these findings as part of the capitalist world ecology "dialectical unity" of capital accumulation, co-production of nature and power. We suggest that the world-ecology approach allows us to grasp green bonds as a complex form that has so far been ignored in the relevant literature. As any other phenomenon of financialization, a green bond should not be understood in isolation from its material basis, since it is from that basis - and its social and environmental conditions and contradictions - that it appropriates value. As the example of the Brazilian forestry sector illuminates, the "greenness" of the financial debt inscribed in green bonds may come into existence at the expense of the social and environmental debt that underlie the forestry sector productive model.
   Hence, although the explicit inclusion of "environmental concerns" into financial considerations and project implementation has been praised as a step towards the recognition that finance has a material impact on the planet and that these externalities shall be accounted for, the article warns of the typical green arithmetic move put forward by green bonds. Green bonds inevitably co-produce nature and social relations, but in a very unequal way that emphasizes capital accumulation and that does not necessarily protect the environment (even when standards are introduced). Much to the contrary, green bonds may come into being at the expense of other ways of living ecologically, and by restoring injustices of the past and creating a regenerative future - in other words, by creating debt.
C1 [Miola, Iage] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
   [Miola, Iage; Prol, Flavio] Ctr Brasileno Anal & Planificac CEBRAP Brasil, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
   [Junqueira, Gabriela de Oliveira] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Derecho, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
   [Ferrando, Tomaso] Univ Amberes, Fac Derecho, Grp Invest Derecho & Desarrollo, Antwerp, Belgium.
   [Ferrando, Tomaso; Herrera, Hector] Univ Amberes, Inst Polit Desarrollo IOB, Antwerp, Belgium.
   [Vecchione-Goncalves, Marcela] Univ Fed Para, Program Postgrad Desarrollo Sostenible Trop Hume, Relac Int & Desairollo, Belem, Para, Brazil.
C3 Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (UNIFESP); Universidade de Sao Paulo;
   Universidade Federal do Para
RP Miola, I (corresponding author), Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.; Miola, I (corresponding author), Ctr Brasileno Anal & Planificac CEBRAP Brasil, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
EM iage.miola@unifesp.br; goliveirajunqueira@gmail.com; fmprol15@gmail.com;
   marcela.vecchione@gmail.com; tomaso.ferrando@uantwerpen.be;
   hector.herrera@uantwerpen.be
OI de Oliveira Junqueira, Gabriela/0000-0002-3853-2817
CR Aglietta M, 2015, INT ENVIRON AGREEM-P, V15, P403, DOI 10.1007/s10784-015-9298-1
   Ahrens S., 2017, PLANTACOES FLORESTAI, P73
   Alves da Silva T.L., 2018, TERRA LIVRE, V33, P159
   [Anonymous], 2008, RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS
   Antal M, 2016, CLIM POLICY, V16, P165, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2014.992003
   Barbosa RA, 2019, POLEMICA, V19, P69, DOI 10.12957/polemica.2019.46671
   Bigger P, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V3, P601, DOI 10.1177/2514848619876539
   Borges A., 2019, REV RI, P10
   Bracking S, 2019, ANTIPODE, V51, P709, DOI 10.1111/anti.12510
   Celulose Irani, 2020, REL SUST 2019
   Cerrato D, 2020, ACCOUNT ECON LAW, V10, DOI 10.1515/ael-2019-0006
   Climate Bonds Initiative, 2020, GREEN BONDS FRAM OV
   Climate Bonds Initiative, 2020, Explaining Green Bonds
   Escobar Arturo., 2011, Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, DOI 10.1515/9781400839926
   European Investment Bank (EIB), 2020, CLIM AW BONDS
   European Union Technical Expert Group on sustainable finance, 2020, TECHN REP TAX FIN RE
   Flammer C., 2020, ENV ENERGY POLICY EC, V1, P95, DOI [10.1086/706794, DOI 10.1086/706794]
   Flammer C., 2018, 023 GLOB DEV POL CTR
   Gibson-Graham JK, 2008, PROG HUM GEOG, V32, P613, DOI 10.1177/0309132508090821
   Hazeu M.T., 2020, REV POLITICA PUBLICA, V20, P433
   Industria Brasileira de Arvores, 2019, REL AN 2019
   International Financial Corporation, 2020, EM MARK GREEN BONDS
   International Financial Corporation y Climate Bonds Initiative, 2018, CREAT GREEN BOND MAR
   Jessop Bob., 2012, DEVELOPMENT, V55, P17, DOI DOI 10.1057/DEV.2011.104
   Jones R, 2020, GEOFORUM, V114, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.05.014
   Klabin, 2020, REL SUST
   Klabin, 2020, APR I 2T20
   KPMG, 2015, GEAR GREEN BONDS
   Kroger M., 2008, BRAZ TOD TRANS BROZ
   Kroger M., 2015, ESTADO BUROCRACIA CO, P171
   Kröger M, 2016, J PEASANT STUD, V43, P886, DOI 10.1080/03066150.2016.1140646
   Kröger M, 2014, J PEASANT STUD, V41, P235, DOI 10.1080/03066150.2014.890596
   Kröger M, 2013, GLOBALIZATIONS, V10, P837, DOI 10.1080/14747731.2013.814433
   Kröger M, 2012, DEV CHANGE, V43, P947, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01787.x
   Kudavicz M., 2014, B DATALUTA
   Kuhlmann W., 2019, IND TREE PLANTATIONS
   MAPA, 2018, PLAN NAC DES FLOR PL
   Marks S, 2011, MOD LAW REV, V74, P57, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00836.x
   Marques M.I.M., 2016, REV GEONORDESTE, V27, P213
   Moore J, 2015, Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the accumulation of capital
   Moore J.W., 2014, STRUCTURES WORLD POL, P285
   Moore Jason., 2014, New Geographies, V06, P10
   Moore Jason., 2011, Upping the Anti, V12, P47
   Moore JW, 2015, CRIT HIST STUD, V2, P1, DOI 10.1086/681007
   Moore JW, 2003, ORGAN ENVIRON, V16, P431, DOI 10.1177/1086026603259091
   OECD, 2017, MOB BOND MARK LOW CA
   OLIVEIRA A. B., 2018, REV GEOGRAFIA INTERD, V4, P135
   Pantoja V.M. L., 2016, REV POLITICA TRABALH, V45, P327
   Paranque B, 2019, RES INT BUS FINANC, V47, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.12.003
   Parenti C., 2016, ANTHROPOCENE CAPITAL, P166
   Park SK, 2018, STANFORD J INT LAW, V54, P1
   Perez O., 2016, Minnesota Journal of Law, Science, and Technology, V17, P153
   Perpetua G.M., 2017, REV NERA, V20, P61
   Polanyi K., 1944, GREAT TRANSFORMATION
   Prol F., 2020, ECOLOGIA POLITICA, V59, P57
   Reyes O., 2020, Change finance, not the climate
   Sachs J D., 2019, Handbook of green finance: Energy security and sustainable development, DOI [10., 10.1007/978-981-13-0227-5, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-0227-5]
   Shishlov I, 2018, Green Bonds Research Program Work Package 2
   Silva M.O., 2014, REV ELETRONICA ASS G, V11, P60
   Silva Neta M.Q., 2018, SOU MULHER PRATICAME
   Siswantoro Dodik, 2018, E3S Web of Conferences, V74, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/20187401003
   Sitawi, 2019, PAR IND DEB VERD CEL
   Sitawi, 2020, OP BRAS SUST CRED
   Sustainalytics, 2017, KLAB GREEN BOND FRAM
   Sustainalytics, 2016, SUZ PAP CEL GREEN BO
   Sustainalytics, 2016, FIBR GREEN BOND FRAM
   Suzano, 2020, REL SUST 2019
   Toledo M.H.S., 2012, CADERNOS IHUIDEIAS, V10
   Vecchione-Goncalves M., 2018, REV CERRADOS CPT, P44
   Voivodic Mauricio de Almeida, 2011, Ambient. soc., V14, P115, DOI 10.1590/S1414-753X2011000100007
   WACQUANT LJD, 1985, SOC FORCES, V64, P17, DOI 10.2307/2578970
   Weber O, 2019, Centre for International Governance Innovation Papers, V210
   World Bank, 2017, GREEN BONDS
   WRM, 2013, FSC CONS COMPL PROC
   Zhang DY, 2019, FINANC RES LETT, V29, P425, DOI 10.1016/j.frl.2019.02.003
NR 75
TC 2
Z9 3
U1 4
U2 41
PU UNIV AUTONOMA MADRID
PI MADRID
PA UNIV AUTONOMA MADRID, MADRID, 00000, SPAIN
SN 1699-3950
J9 RELAC INT-MADR
JI Relac. Int.-Madr.
PD FEB-MAY
PY 2021
IS 46
BP 161
EP 180
DI 10.15366/relacionesinternacionales2021.46.009
PN 1
PG 20
WC International Relations
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC International Relations
GA QQ6NQ
UT WOS:000624640200010
OA Green Submitted, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Baig, F
   Ali, L
   Faiz, MA
   Chen, HA
   Sherif, M
AF Baig, Faisal
   Ali, Luqman
   Faiz, Muhammad Abrar
   Chen, Haonan
   Sherif, Mohsen
TI How accurate are the machine learning models in improving monthly
   rainfall prediction in hyper arid environment?
SO JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Rainfall forecasting; Arid regions; Machine learning; Sensitivity
   analysis
ID PRECIPITATION DATA
AB Arid regions like the United Arab Emirates (UAE) face a dire challenge of scarce water resources and unpredictable climate patterns. This study investigates the efficacy of advanced Machine Learning (ML) techniques in enhancing rainfall prediction within hyper-arid environments. Leveraging an extensive 30-year dataset from 1991 to 2020, this study harnessed the power of XGBoost, LSTM, Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boost (GB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Linear Regression (LR), and ensemble methods to significantly enhance the prediction accuracy of monthly rainfall over UAE. In the initial univariate analysis, focused solely on rainfall as the predictor, the ML models displayed encouraging performance during the training phase, achieving an impressive correlation coefficient (CC) of 0.88 for both XGBoost and the ensemble models. However, their predictive efficacy witnessed a decline during the testing phase, where the maximum CC reached 0.45. In contrast, traditional models like Linear Regression and SVM, yielded subpar results in both training and testing, exhibiting correlation values lower than 0.3. To address these limitations, a multivariate analysis is conducted by incorporating additional meteorological parameters, including wind speed, temperature, humidity, and evapotranspiration. This augmentation proved highly beneficial as it substantially enhanced the models' predictive capacities during the testing period. The XGB achieves a CC of 0.76, LSTM improves from 0.21 to 0.71, and stacked models exhibit promising behavior jumping from an average of 0.44 to 0.82 during the testing periods. Additionally, we performed a sensitivity analysis utilizing LASSO regression, which revealed that wind speed and minimum temperature emerged as the most influential parameters for monthly rainfall prediction in the arid context. These two meteorological factors exerted a substantial impact on the accuracy of our predictive models, underscoring their significance in understanding and forecasting rainfall patterns in hyper-arid regions, such as the United Arab Emirates. The identification of these key drivers further strengthens the foundation for effective water resource management and climate adaptation strategies in such challenging environments. This study provides valuable insights for water resource planning, agriculture, and climate resilience strategies in hyper-arid regions. Further research can build upon these results to enhance rainfall prediction models and support sustainable development in arid regions.
C1 [Baig, Faisal; Sherif, Mohsen] UAE Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, COE, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates.
   [Baig, Faisal; Faiz, Muhammad Abrar; Sherif, Mohsen] UAE Univ, Natl Water & Energy Ctr, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates.
   [Ali, Luqman] UAE Univ, Coll Informat Technol, AI & Robot Lab, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates.
   [Chen, Haonan] Colorado State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Ft Collins, CO USA.
   [Faiz, Muhammad Abrar] Northeast Agr Univ, Sch Water Conservancy & Civil Engn, Harbin, Peoples R China.
C3 United Arab Emirates University; United Arab Emirates University; United
   Arab Emirates University; Colorado State University; Northeast
   Agricultural University - China
RP Baig, F; Sherif, M (corresponding author), UAE Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, COE, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates.
EM 201990038@uaeu.ac.ae; msherif@uaeu.ac.ae
RI Ali, Luqman/IST-1064-2023; Faiz, Muhammad Abrar/I-3994-2019
OI Abrar, Muhammad/0000-0003-0626-0308
CR Abbot J., 2018, Eng Math Top Rainfall, DOI [10.5772/intechopen.72619, DOI 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.72619, 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.72619]
   Abebe WT, 2023, J BIG DATA-GER, V10, DOI 10.1186/s40537-022-00683-3
   Adaryani FR, 2022, J HYDROL, V614, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128463
   Al Senafi F, 2015, INT J CLIMATOL, V35, P4509, DOI 10.1002/joc.4302
   Amini A, 2024, J HYDROL, V631, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130804
   Amini A, 2022, J HYDROL, V612, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128197
   [Anonymous], 2011, Fundamentals of numerical weather prediction
   Baig F, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15041078
   Baig F, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14225827
   Baljon M, 2023, WATER-SUI, V15, DOI 10.3390/w15040826
   Bárdossy A, 2017, J HYDROL, V544, P397, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.039
   Barrera-Animas AY, 2022, MACH LEARN APPL, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100204
   Bauer P, 2015, NATURE, V525, P47, DOI 10.1038/nature14956
   Chen C, 2023, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105669
   Chen HN, 2020, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V58, P982, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2942280
   Chen HN, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P10669, DOI 10.1029/2019GL084771
   Cheung P., 2012, 3 WMO INT S NOWC VER, P6
   Cramer S, 2017, EXPERT SYST APPL, V85, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.05.029
   Deman VMH, 2022, FRONT WATER, V4, DOI 10.3389/frwa.2022.1053020
   Diez-Sierra J, 2020, J HYDROL, V586, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124789
   Dong JH, 2023, ENG APPL ARTIF INTEL, V117, DOI 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105579
   Elshaboury N., 2021, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, V1900, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1900/1/012015
   Endalie D, 2022, WATER SUPPLY, V22, P3448, DOI 10.2166/ws.2021.391
   Faiz MA, 2021, INT J CLIMATOL, V41, P5003, DOI 10.1002/joc.7113
   Faiz MA, 2018, ATMOS RES, V211, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.05.006
   Fan PY, 2024, ATMOS RES, V300, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.107216
   Fan YL, 2023, ATMOS RES, V283, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106570
   Feng GL, 2020, CHAOS SOLITON FRACT, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110160
   Fonseca R, 2022, INT J CLIMATOL, V42, P1092, DOI 10.1002/joc.7291
   Frame JM, 2022, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V26, P3377, DOI 10.5194/hess-26-3377-2022
   Francis D, 2021, ATMOS RES, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105364
   Gutierrez-Lopez A, 2019, CLIMATE, V7, DOI 10.3390/cli7110131
   He RF, 2024, EXPERT SYST APPL, V235, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121160
   He RF, 2022, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V251, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109125
   Kumar KN, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V119, DOI 10.1002/2014JD021724
   Kumar KN, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-12430-3
   Kumar KN, 2015, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V120, P1637, DOI 10.1002/2014JD022341
   Le PVV, 2023, NAT COMMUN, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-39463-9
   Li HJ, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V108, P799, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04706-9
   Lim T, 2022, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V159, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2021.105025
   Liu J, 2022, J HYDROL, V609, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127748
   Luong TM, 2020, ATMOS SCI LETT, V21, DOI 10.1002/asl.981
   Mohan TS, 2020, MON WEATHER REV, V148, P3181, DOI 10.1175/MWR-D-20-0073.1
   Nelli N, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.972380
   Palmitessa R, 2022, WATER RES, V223, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118972
   Parviz L, 2023, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V37, P3833, DOI 10.1007/s11269-023-03528-7
   Pathan MS, 2021, USNC-URSI RADIO SCI, P99, DOI 10.23919/USNC-URSI51813.2021.9703664
   Piadeh F, 2023, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V167, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105772
   Pirone D, 2023, J HYDROL, V617, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128949
   Rostam MG, 2020, J ARID LAND, V12, P854, DOI 10.1007/s40333-020-0097-3
   Shi XJ, 2015, ADV NEUR IN, V28
   Singh V., 2020, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, V9, DOI [10.17577/IJERTV9IS070464, DOI 10.17577/IJERTV9IS070464]
   Van SP, 2020, J HYDROINFORM, V22, P541, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2020.095
   Steinhoff DF, 2018, MON WEATHER REV, V146, P1383, DOI 10.1175/MWR-D-17-0296.1
   Tang YH, 2023, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101406
   Thirumalai Chandrasegar, 2017, 2017 International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICEI). Proceedings, P1114, DOI 10.1109/ICOEI.2017.8300884
   Tien-Thinh Le, 2020, CIGOS 2019, Innovation for Sustainable Infrastructure. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Geotechnics, Civil Engineering Works and Structures. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering (LNCE 54), P1191, DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-0802-8_191
   Vishkaee FA, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V117, DOI 10.1029/2011JD016339
   Wang C, 2021, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3389/feart.2021.659310
   Wang C, 2023, ATMOS RES, V288, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106724
   Wang GG, 2023, NEUROCOMPUTING, V520, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.11.078
   Wang N, 2022, ATMOS RES, V275, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106221
   Wang S, 2022, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101139
   Woo WC, 2017, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/atmos8030048
   Wu CL, 2013, ENG APPL ARTIF INTEL, V26, P997, DOI 10.1016/j.engappai.2012.05.023
   Wu ZJ, 2021, J HYDROL, V603, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127028
   Xu YH, 2022, J HYDROL, V608, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127553
   Yang S., 2023, Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems, V2, DOI [10.1175/AIES-D-22-0078.1, DOI 10.1175/AIES-D-22-0078.1]
   Yucel I, 2015, J HYDROL, V523, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.042
NR 69
TC 11
Z9 11
U1 5
U2 5
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0022-1694
EI 1879-2707
J9 J HYDROL
JI J. Hydrol.
PD APR
PY 2024
VL 633
AR 131040
DI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131040
EA MAR 2024
PG 19
WC Engineering, Civil; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Geology; Water Resources
GA QD0O7
UT WOS:001218825500001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sarkar, A
   Fwanyanga, FM
   Horn, LN
   Welzel, S
   Diederichs, M
   Kerk, LJ
   Zimmermann, M
   Reinhold-Hurek, B
AF Sarkar, Abhijit
   Fwanyanga, Felicitas M.
   Horn, Lydia N.
   Welzel, Sina
   Diederichs, Marco
   Kerk, Luca Jonas
   Zimmermann, Meret
   Reinhold-Hurek, Barbara
TI Towards inoculant development for Bambara groundnut (<i>Vigna
   subterranean</i> (L.) Verdc) pulse crop production in Namibia
SO FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Bambara groundnut; legumes; Bradyrhizobium; bioinoculant; Kavango
ID NITROGEN-FIXING BACTERIUM; SP NOV.; ROOT-NODULES; OKAVANGO REGION;
   RHIZOBIA
AB Introduction: The globally expanding population, together with climate change, poses a risk to the availability of food for humankind. Bambara groundnut (BGN) (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc) is a neglected, relatively drought-tolerant native legume of Sub-Saharan Africa that has the potential to become a successful food crop because of its nutritional quality and climate-smart features. Nitrogen fixation from root nodule symbiosis with climate-adapted rhizobial symbionts can contribute nitrogen and organic material in nutrient-poor soil and improve yields. However, high soil temperature and drought often reduce the abundance of native rhizobia in such soil. Therefore, the formulation of climate-smart biofertilizers has the potential to improve the farming of BGN at a low cost in a sustainable manner.Method: The effect of seven Bradyrhizobium spp. strains native to Namibia, including B. vignae and B. subterraneum, were tested on three Namibian BGN varieties (red, brown, cream) in greenhouse pot experiments in Namibia, using soil from the target region of Kavango. Each variety was treated with a mixed inoculant consisting of seven preselected strains ("MK") as well as with one promising single inoculant strain.Results: The results revealed that in all three varieties, the two inoculants (mixed or single) outperformed the non-inoculated cultivars in terms of shoot dry weight by up to 70%; the mixed inoculant treatment performed significantly better (p < 0.05) in all cases compared to the single inoculant used. To test whether the inoculant strains were established in root nodules, they were identified by sequence analysis. In many cases, the indigenous strains of Kavango soil outcompeted the inoculant strains of the mix for nodule occupancy, depending on the BGN variety. As a further preselection, each of the individual strains of the mix was used to inoculate the three varieties under sterile conditions in a phytotron. The agronomic trait and root nodulation response of the host plant inoculations strongly differed with the BGN variety. Even competitiveness in nodule occupancy without involving any indigenous strains from soil differed and depended strictly on the variety.Discussion: Severe differences in symbiont-plant interactions appear to occur in BGN depending on the plant variety, demanding for coupling of breeding efforts with selecting efficient inoculant strains.
C1 [Sarkar, Abhijit; Welzel, Sina; Diederichs, Marco; Kerk, Luca Jonas; Zimmermann, Meret; Reinhold-Hurek, Barbara] Univ Bremen, Fac Biol & Chem, CBIB Ctr Biomol Interact Bremen, Dept Microbe Plant Interact, Bremen, Germany.
   [Fwanyanga, Felicitas M.; Horn, Lydia N.] Univ Namibia, Multidisciplinary Res Serv, Zero Emiss Res Initiat, Windhoek, Namibia.
C3 University of Bremen; University of Namibia
RP Reinhold-Hurek, B (corresponding author), Univ Bremen, Fac Biol & Chem, CBIB Ctr Biomol Interact Bremen, Dept Microbe Plant Interact, Bremen, Germany.
EM breinhold@uni-bremen.de
RI Sarkar, Dr. Abhijit/AAW-3889-2020
OI Sarkar, Abhijit/0009-0005-6256-683X
FU The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research,
   authorship, and/or publication of this article. The authors are grateful
   for funding of the German-Namibian cooperation. Grants of the Federal
   Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, [01DG21008]; Federal Ministry
   of Education and Research (BMBF) [57558109]; German Academic Exchange
   Service (DAAD) [2019-1-DE01-KA107-004934]; Erasmus ICM International
   Credit Mobility Grant
FX The authors are grateful for the granting of a Research and Collection
   Permit to BR-H (RPIV01042023) by the National Commission on Research,
   Science and Technology, Windhoek, Namibia, and export permit 131729. We
   also thank Dennis Tebbe for contributing some preliminary data on BGN
   inoculation effects during his Bachelor thesis at the University of
   Bremen.r The author(s) declare financial support was received for the
   research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The authors
   are grateful for funding of the German-Namibian cooperation. Grants of
   the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, grant no.
   01DG21008) and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD, grant no.
   57558109) were given to BR-H and LH in the framework of "Partnerships
   for sustainable solutions with Sub-Saharan Africa". Travel of FMF was
   supported by a Erasmus ICM International Credit Mobility Grant to the
   University of Bremen (2019-1-DE01-KA107-004934).
CR Ajayi O. O., 2020, J. Microbiol. Pathol, V5, P118
   Allito BB, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-83235-8
   Becker JN, 2024, PLANT SOIL, V500, P33, DOI 10.1007/s11104-023-06051-1
   Bünger W, 2021, FRONT MICROBIOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2021.611704
   CARADUS JR, 1979, PLANT SOIL, V51, P437, DOI 10.1007/BF02197791
   Chen YX, 2018, FRONT MICROBIOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01338
   Chidebe IN, 2018, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V84, DOI 10.1128/AEM.01712-17
   DEBRUIJN FJ, 1992, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V58, P2180, DOI 10.1128/AEM.58.7.2180-2187.1992
   EAGLESHAM ARJ, 1982, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V44, P611, DOI 10.1128/AEM.44.3.611-618.1982
   Felsenstein J., 1993, PHYLIP (Phylogeny Interface Program) version 3.6. Distributed by the author
   Gedamu SA, 2021, CABI AGR BIOSCI, V2, DOI 10.1186/s43170-021-00025-y
   Gomoung D., 2017, American Journal of Plant Sciences, V8, P1953, DOI 10.4236/ajps.2017.88131
   Groenemeyer Jann, 2013, Biodiversity Ecol, V5, P287, DOI 10.7809/b-e.00282
   Grönemeyer JL, 2014, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V80, P7244, DOI 10.1128/AEM.02417-14
   Grönemeyer JL, 2018, FRONT MICROBIOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02194
   Grönemeyer JL, 2017, INT J SYST EVOL MICR, V67, P4884, DOI 10.1099/ijsem.0.002039
   Grönemeyer JL, 2015, INT J SYST EVOL MICR, V65, P4886, DOI 10.1099/ijsem.0.000666
   Grönemeyer JL, 2015, INT J SYST EVOL MICR, V65, P3241, DOI 10.1099/ijsem.0.000403
   Groengroeft A., 2013, Biodiversity Ecol, V5, P105, DOI 10.7809/b-e.00259
   Gronemeyer JL, 2016, INT J SYST EVOL MICR, V66, P62, DOI 10.1099/ijsem.0.000674
   Guei N. K. R., 2019, Int. J. Res. Stud. Microbiol. Biotechnol, V5, P13, DOI [10.20431/2454-9428.0502004, DOI 10.20431/2454-9428.0502004]
   Hillocks R. J., 2012, African Crop Science Journal, V20, P1
   Ibny FYI, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-48944-1
   Ikenganyia E., 2018, International journal of Horticulture, Agriculture and Food science, V2, P54, DOI 10.22161/ijhaf.2.3.5
   신완식, 2016, [Korean Journal of Soil Science & Fertilizer, 한국토양비료학회지(Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer)], V49, P17, DOI 10.7745/KJSSF.2016.49.1.017
   Jensen H L., 1942, Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, V66, P98
   Laguerre G, 1996, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V62, P2029, DOI 10.1128/AEM.62.6.2029-2036.1996
   Latif R., 2014, J. Biol. Med. Sci, V2, P7
   Luchen C. C., 2018, J. Plant Pathol. Microbiol, V9, DOI [10.4172/2157-7471.1000456, DOI 10.4172/2157-7471.1000456]
   Maluk M, 2023, FRONT AGRON, V5, DOI 10.3389/fagro.2023.1196873
   Mandizvo T, 2019, HELIYON, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01249
   Mendoza-Suarez M, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2021.690567
   Mohammed M, 2021, FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S, V5, DOI 10.3389/fsufs.2021.672247
   Muhammad Sajid Muhammad Sajid, 2011, Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, V27, P573
   Ngo Nkot L, 2015, American Journal of Microbiological Research, V3, P65, DOI [DOI 10.12691/AJMR-3-2-5, 10.12691/ajmr-3-2-5]
   Pulido-Suárez L, 2021, FRONT AGRON, V3, DOI 10.3389/fagro.2021.660574
   Puozaa DK, 2021, FRONT AGRON, V3, DOI 10.3389/fagro.2021.692238
   Redjeki ES, 2013, ACTA HORTIC, V979, P389
   Saad MM, 2019, MOL PLANT MICROBE IN, V32, P208, DOI 10.1094/MPMI-07-18-0188-R
   SAITOU N, 1987, MOL BIOL EVOL, V4, P406, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454
   Schneider M, 1996, WORLD J MICROB BIOT, V12, P163, DOI 10.1007/BF00364681
   Tamura K, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P11030, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0404206101
   Tamura K, 2021, MOL BIOL EVOL, V38, P3022, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msab120
   VANBERKUM P, 1990, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V56, P3835, DOI 10.1128/AEM.56.12.3835-3841.1990
   Versalovic James, 1994, Methods in Molecular and Cellular Biology, V5, P25
   Yakubu H., 2010, Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, V18, P229
NR 46
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 6
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
SN 1664-462X
J9 FRONT PLANT SCI
JI Front. Plant Sci.
PD OCT 26
PY 2023
VL 14
AR 1270356
DI 10.3389/fpls.2023.1270356
PG 16
WC Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences
GA Y6OW9
UT WOS:001106444400001
PM 37965028
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Palosuo, T
   Hoffmann, MP
   Rötter, RP
   Lehtonen, HS
AF Palosuo, Taru
   Hoffmann, Munir P.
   Roetter, Reimund P.
   Lehtonen, Heikki S.
TI Sustainable intensification of crop production under alternative future
   changes in climate and technology: The case of the North Savo region
SO AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptation; Crop simulation; Grain nitrogen content; Leaching; Yield;
   Water productivity
ID CHANGE IMPACTS; NITROGEN MANAGEMENT; SIMULATION-MODELS; LAND-USE; YIELD;
   WATER; FINLAND; BARLEY; AGRICULTURE; ADAPTATION
AB CONTEXT: Sustainable intensification (SI) is needed to cope with the challenges agriculture faces with respect to climate change and increasing food demand. Northern cropping systems may benefit from longer and warmer growing seasons, but the sustainability of production will be challenged due to increased production risks. Concentrated efforts are needed to find ways to adapt cropping to changing conditions and sustainably intensify production.
   OBJECTIVE: This study combined stakeholder knowledge and simulation modelling to find means for the sustainable intensification of cereal production in the North Savo region in Finland.
   METHODS: Stakeholders identified promising intensification measures in two workshops. Alternative options for sustainable intensification and climate adaptations and their combinations were assessed using the APSIM cropping system model. The model was used to assess cereal yields, the grain nitrogen (N) content, nitrate leaching and water productivity for a historical baseline (1981?2010) and mid-century conditions (2041?2070) projected by five general circulation models for different emission scenarios. Simulated management options included improved cultivars with later maturing characteristics, improved heat/drought resistance and nitrogenuse efficiency, increased N fertilisation levels, improved crop rotations together with improved soil, as well as supplementary and full irrigation.
   RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The simulation results indicated that although a warming climate in conjunction with elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations generally increase yield levels, N uptake and water productivity, risks associated with higher N leaching due to increased precipitation are a challenge for the sustainability of crop production. Overall, different SI options affected the sustainability indicators studied more than future projected climate, strongly suggesting that there is a large potential for sustainably intensifying crop production in northern conditions, particularly when applying more than one intensification measure at a time. Among a wide set of SI options tested for their sustainability impacts, improved crop cultivars showed the firmest positive impacts. This was supported by the views of agricultural stakeholders in the region.
   SIGNIFICANCE: While the agricultural stakeholder?s suggestions for alternative SI options challenged the simulation approach to some extent, the simulations provided robust information for comparing the sustainability impacts of alternative measures.
C1 [Palosuo, Taru; Lehtonen, Heikki S.] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Latokartanonkaari 9, Helsinki 00790, Finland.
   [Hoffmann, Munir P.; Roetter, Reimund P.] Univ Gottingen, Trop Plant Prod & Agr Syst Modelling TROPAGS, Grisebachstr 6, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany.
   [Hoffmann, Munir P.] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Eberswalder Str 84, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany.
   [Hoffmann, Munir P.] AGVOLUTION GmbH, Gottingen, Germany.
   [Roetter, Reimund P.] Univ Gottingen, Ctr Biodivers & Sustainable Land Use CBL, Buesgenweg 1, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany.
C3 Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke); University of Gottingen;
   Leibniz Association; Leibniz Zentrum fur Agrarlandschaftsforschung
   (ZALF); University of Gottingen
RP Palosuo, T (corresponding author), Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Latokartanonkaari 9, Helsinki 00790, Finland.
EM taru.palosuo@luke.fi; mhoffma@gwdg.de;
   reimund-paul.roetter@agr.uni-goettingen.de; heikki.lehtonen@luke.fi
RI Hoffmann, Munir/AAB-6221-2019; Rotter, Reimund P./Y-9579-2019; Palosuo,
   Taru/B-9593-2012
OI Rotter, Reimund P./0000-0002-3804-9964; Palosuo,
   Taru/0000-0003-4322-3450; Hoffmann, Munir/0000-0002-9791-5658
FU Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland; BoostIA project - Luke;
   DivCSA project - Academy of Finland [316215]; BMBF [01LL1802A]; BARISTA
   project [031B0811A]
FX The authors are grateful to an anonymous reviewer for the valuable
   comments on earlier versions of this paper. This work was conducted as
   part of the international SUSTag project of the FACCE-SURPLUS ERA-NET
   Cofund in the framework of the FACCE JPI. The participation by the
   Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) in the SUSTAg project was
   funded by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland. This work
   was also supported by the BoostIA project funded by Luke and the DivCSA
   project funded by the Academy of Finland (decision no. 316215) . MH and
   RPR were supported by the BMBF funded SALLnet project (Grant number:
   01LL1802A) under the SPACES2 programme and by the BARISTA project (Grant
   number: 031B0811A) , respectively.
CR Aggarwal P, 2019, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V23, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.04.002
   Asseng S, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P827, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1916, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1916]
   Asseng S, 2000, EUR J AGRON, V12, P37, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(99)00044-1
   Bouraoui F, 2004, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V66, P109, DOI 10.1023/B:CLIM.0000043147.09365.e3
   Carter TR, 1996, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V79, P301, DOI 10.1016/0168-1923(95)02287-2
   Challinor AJ, 2009, J EXP BOT, V60, P2775, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erp062
   Chenu K, 2017, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V22, P472, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.02.003
   Collins M, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1029
   Corbeels M, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V256, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.02.026
   Dreccer MF, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V248, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.006
   Ekroos J, 2016, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V3, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2015.00145
   Ergon Å, 2016, GRASS FORAGE SCI, V71, P667, DOI 10.1111/gfs.12250
   Ewert F, 2005, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V107, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2004.12.003
   Ewert F, 2015, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V72, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.003
   Ewert F., 2018, **DATA OBJECT**, DOI [10.4228/ZALF.DK.59, DOI 10.4228/ZALF.DK.59]
   Folberth C, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms11872
   Garnett T, 2013, SCIENCE, V341, P33, DOI 10.1126/science.1234485
   Gaudio N, 2019, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V39, DOI 10.1007/s13593-019-0562-6
   Granlund K, 2000, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V80, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00132-8
   Hakala K, 2011, AGR FOOD SCI, V20, P3, DOI 10.2137/145960611795163042
   Hoffmann MP, 2018, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V259, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2018.02.009
   Holzworth DP, 2014, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V62, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.07.009
   Hyytiäinen K, 2011, AGR SYST, V104, P634, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2011.06.006
   Janssen S, 2007, AGR SYST, V94, P622, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2007.03.001
   Kanter DR, 2018, AGR SYST, V163, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.010
   Kell DB, 2011, ANN BOT-LONDON, V108, P407, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcr175
   Kersebaum KC, 2015, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V72, P402, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.05.009
   Kollas C, 2015, EUR J AGRON, V70, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2015.06.007
   Lamb A, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P488, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2910, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2910]
   Leakey ADB, 2019, ANNU REV PLANT BIOL, V70, P781, DOI 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040305
   Lehtonen H, 2018, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/agriculture8070093
   Lehtonen H, 2015, AGR FOOD SCI, V24, P219, DOI 10.23986/afsci.51080
   Liu X, 2016, AGR SYST, V144, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.003
   Luke, 2019, ECONOMYDOCTOR FARM A
   Luke, 2019, ECONOMYDOCTOR FARM A
   Mann ME, 2018, SCI ADV, V4, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aat3272
   Mann ME, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/srep45242
   Meinshausen M, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P213, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z
   Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Finland, 2014, RURAL DEV PROGRAMME
   Movedi E, 2019, ECOL MODEL, V401, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.03.001
   Nas T. F., 1996, COST BENEFIT ANAL TH, V2
   Official Statistics of Finland (OFS), 2019, CROP PRODUCTION STAT
   Olesen JE, 2011, EUR J AGRON, V34, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2010.11.003
   Olesen JE, 2002, EUR J AGRON, V16, P239, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00004-7
   Palosuo T, 2015, CLIM RES, V65, P221, DOI 10.3354/cr01317
   Parent B, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P10642, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1720716115
   Paustian K, 2016, NATURE, V532, P49, DOI 10.1038/nature17174
   Peltonen-Sainio P, 2016, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V16, P1521, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0875-1
   Peltonen-Sainio P, 2010, AGR FOOD SCI, V19, P341, DOI 10.2137/145960610794197588
   Pirttioja N, 2019, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V264, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.10.006
   Pohjois-Savon Liitto, 2014, MAAKUNTASUUNNITELMA
   PRIESTLEY CHB, 1972, MON WEATHER REV, V100, P81, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0081:OTAOSH>2.3.CO;2
   Probert ME, 1998, AGR SYST, V56, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00028-0
   Purola T, 2018, AGR SYST, V162, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.018
   Reidsma P, 2015, AGR SYST, V141, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.10.009
   Reidsma P, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/4/045004
   Reyenga PJ, 1999, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V14, P297, DOI 10.1016/S1364-8152(98)00081-4
   Rötter RP, 2018, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V45, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2018.05.009
   Rötter RP, 2018, FIELD CROP RES, V221, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.023
   Rötter RP, 2011, EUR J AGRON, V35, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2011.06.003
   Rotter R.P., 2013, 2013A
   Rötter RP, 2013, ECOL EVOL, V3, P4197, DOI 10.1002/ece3.782
   Rötter RP, 2011, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V1, P175
   Rummukainen M, 2012, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V3, P115, DOI 10.1002/wcc.160
   Ruosteenoja K., 2016, Geophysica, V51
   Salo TJ, 2016, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V154, P1218, DOI 10.1017/S0021859615001124
   Savary S, 2006, ANNU REV PHYTOPATHOL, V44, P89, DOI 10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143342
   Schils R, 2018, EUR J AGRON, V101, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2018.09.003
   Schneider F, 2017, SOIL TILL RES, V174, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2017.07.005
   Schönhart M, 2016, AGR SYST, V145, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.02.008
   Simkin AJ, 2019, J EXP BOT, V70, P1119, DOI 10.1093/jxb/ery445
   Stöckle CO, 2020, FRONT PLANT SCI, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2020.00737
   Swarbreck SM, 2019, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V24, P892, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.06.006
   Tao FL, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P1291, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14019
   Tao FL, 2017, EUR J AGRON, V82, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2016.10.012
   Tardieu F, 2017, J EXP BOT, V68, P1393, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erx042
   Tiwari DN, 1999, AGR SYST, V60, P99, DOI 10.1016/S0308-521X(99)00021-9
   Vanuytrecht E, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P1806, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13600
   Wang E, 2017, NAT PLANTS, V3, DOI 10.1038/nplants.2017.102
   Webber H, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-06525-2
   Woli P, 2016, AGR WATER MANAGE, V171, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.04.003
   YLARANTA T, 1993, AGR SCI FINLAND, V2, P281, DOI 10.23986/afsci.72651
   Ylhäisi JS, 2010, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V10, P1563, DOI 10.5194/nhess-10-1563-2010
   Zomer RJ, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-15794-8
NR 84
TC 11
Z9 12
U1 3
U2 22
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0308-521X
EI 1873-2267
J9 AGR SYST
JI Agric. Syst.
PD MAY
PY 2021
VL 190
AR 103135
DI 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103135
EA MAR 2021
PG 13
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA RW0SU
UT WOS:000646235500010
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Shukla, S
   Landsfeld, M
   Anthony, M
   Budde, M
   Husak, GJ
   Rowland, J
   Funk, C
AF Shukla, Shraddhanand
   Landsfeld, Martin
   Anthony, Michelle
   Budde, Michael
   Husak, Gregory J. J.
   Rowland, James
   Funk, Chris
TI Enhancing the Application of Earth Observations for Improved
   Environmental Decision-Making Using the Early Warning eXplorer (EWX)
SO FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE
LA English
DT Article
DE earth observation; food security; water security; web service; drought;
   climate services; remote sensing
ID SOUTHERN AFRICA; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FOOD SECURITY; SMAP MISSION; DROUGHT;
   PREDICTION; RANGELAND; IMPACTS; SCIENCE
AB The mitigation of losses due to extreme climate events and long-term climate adaptation requires climate informed decision-making. In the past few decades, several remote sensing and modeled-based Earth observations (EOs) have been developed to provide an unprecedented global overview and routine monitoring of climate and its impacts on vegetation and hydrologic conditions, with the goal of supporting informed decision-making. However, their usage in decision-making is particularly limited in climate-risk vulnerable and in situ data-scarce regions such as sub-Saharan Africa, due to lack of access to EOs. Here, we describe the Early Warning eXplorer (EWX), which was developed to address this crucial limitation and facilitate the application of EOs in decision-making, particularly in the food and water-insecure regions of the world. First, the EWX's core framework, which includes (i) the Viewer, (ii) GeoEngine, and (iii) Support Applications, is described. Then, a comprehensive overview of the Viewer, which is a web-based interface used to access EOs, is provided. This includes a description of (i) the maps and associated features to access gridded EO data and anomalies for different temporal averaging periods, (ii) time series graphs and associated features to access EOs aggregated over polygons such as administrative boundaries, and (iii) commonly used EOs served by the EWX that provide assessments of climate and vegetation conditions. Next, examples are provided to demonstrate how EWX can be used to monitor development, progression, spatial extent, and severity of climate-driven extreme events to support timely decisions related to mitigation of food insecurity and flooding impacts. Finally, the value of a regional implementation of EWX at the Regional Centre for Mapping of Resources for Development (RCMRD) in Nairobi, Kenya, is highlighted. Regional implementation of the EWX facilitates access to regionally focused EOs and their availability at polygon boundaries most relevant to the local decision-makers. Similar instances of EWX implemented in other regions, especially those susceptible to food and water security, will likely further enhance the application of EOs for informed decision-making.
C1 [Shukla, Shraddhanand; Landsfeld, Martin; Husak, Gregory J. J.; Funk, Chris] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Climate Hazards Ctr, Dept Geog, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA.
   [Anthony, Michelle] US Geol Survey, KBR Tech Support Serv Contract, Earth Resources Observat & Sci Ctr, Sioux Falls, SD USA.
   [Budde, Michael; Rowland, James; Funk, Chris] US Geol Survey, Earth Resources Observat & Sci Ctr, Sioux Falls, SD USA.
C3 University of California System; University of California Santa Barbara;
   United States Department of the Interior; United States Geological
   Survey; United States Department of the Interior; United States
   Geological Survey
RP Shukla, S (corresponding author), Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Climate Hazards Ctr, Dept Geog, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA.
EM sshukla@ucsb.edu
RI Shukla, Shraddhanand/GSI-6193-2022
OI Shukla, Shraddhanand/0000-0003-0077-6733
FU United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
   [72DFFP19CA00001]; Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
   World Modelers Program under Army Research Office (ARO) prime
   [G14AC00042]; USGS cooperative agreement;  [W911NF-18-1-0018]
FX The authors would like to thank Mr. Patrick Kabatha from the Geospatial
   Information Technology team at the RCMRD for providing usage analytics
   data for RCMRD's EWX, the USGS internal reviewer, Shahriar Pervez, KBR
   contractor to the USGS EROS, for his helpful comments and suggestions on
   this manuscript and the Climate Hazards Center's technical writer,
   Juliet Way-Henthorne, for providing professional editing. The authors
   acknowledge support of the United States Agency for International
   Development (USAID) cooperative agreement no. 72DFFP19CA00001, the USGS
   cooperative agreement #G14AC00042, the USGS Drivers of Drought program,
   and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) World Modelers
   Program under Army Research Office (ARO) prime contract no.
   W911NF-18-1-0018. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or
   recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s)
   and do not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of DARPA and
   ARO, and no such official endorsement by either should be inferred.
CR [Anonymous], 2016, DAM LOSS DUE WEATH C
   Archer ERM, 2017, CLIM RISK MANAG, V16, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2017.03.006
   Arsenault KR, 2020, B AM METEOROL SOC, V101, pE1007, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0264.1
   Ashouri H, 2015, B AM METEOROL SOC, V96, P69, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00068.1
   Begue A, 2014, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V31, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2014.03.024
   Brown ME, 2013, B AM METEOROL SOC, V94, P1125, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00049.1
   Campbell BM, 2016, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V11, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2016.06.002
   Das NN, 2018, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V211, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.011
   Dinku T, 2018, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V144, P292, DOI 10.1002/qj.3244
   Donlon C, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V120, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.07.024
   Dorigo W, 2017, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V203, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.001
   Drusch M, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V120, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.026
   Falkenmark M, 2013, PHILOS T R SOC A, V371, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2012.0410
   FEWS NET, 2020, SO AFR KEY MESS UPD
   Funk C, 2015, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V7, P275, DOI 10.5194/essd-7-275-2015
   Funk C, 2009, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V113, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2008.08.015
   Funk C, 2019, B AM METEOROL SOC, V100, P1011, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0233.1
   Funk C, 2018, B AM METEOROL SOC, V99, pS91, DOI [10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0112.1, 10.1175/bams-d-17-0112.1]
   Funk C, 2015, SCI DATA, V2, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2015.66
   Gelaro R, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P5419, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1
   Gore M, 2020, CLIM DYNAM, V54, P307, DOI 10.1007/s00382-019-05002-w
   Hamill TM, 2006, B AM METEOROL SOC, V87, P33, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-87-1-33
   Hersbach H., 2016, ECMWF Newsletter 147, P7
   Huffman GJ, 2010, SATELLITE RAINFALL APPLICATIONS FOR SURFACE HYDROLOGY, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-2915-7_1
   Jenkerson C. B., 2010, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
   Jiang CY, 2020, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V24, P1251, DOI 10.5194/hess-24-1251-2020
   Karnieli A, 2010, J CLIMATE, V23, P618, DOI 10.1175/2009JCLI2900.1
   Kirtman BP, 2014, B AM METEOROL SOC, V95, P585, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00050.1
   Macharia D., 2020, FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S
   Manatsa D, 2017, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V127, P259, DOI 10.1007/s00704-015-1632-6
   Meque A, 2015, CLIM DYNAM, V44, P1881, DOI 10.1007/s00382-014-2143-3
   Milly PCD, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P573, DOI 10.1126/science.1151915
   Molteni F, 1996, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V122, P73, DOI 10.1002/qj.49712252905
   Pegion K, 2019, B AM METEOROL SOC, V100, P2043, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0270.1
   Pomposi C, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aacc4c
   Pricope NG, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1525, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.10.002
   Reason CJC, 2005, METEOROL ATMOS PHYS, V89, P181, DOI 10.1007/s00703-005-0128-9
   Rodell M, 2018, NATURE, V557, P650, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0123-1
   SADC (Southern African Development Community), 2016, SADC REG VULN ASS AN
   Saha S, 2010, B AM METEOROL SOC, V91, P1015, DOI 10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1
   Schmidhuber J, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P19703, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701976104
   Senay GB, 2020, SENSORS-BASEL, V20, DOI 10.3390/s20071915
   Shukla S, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P1187, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-1187-2020
   Skofronick-Jackson G, 2017, B AM METEOROL SOC, V98, P1679, DOI [10.1175/bams-d-15-00306.1, 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00306.1]
   Szantoi Z, 2019, EUR J REMOTE SENS, V52, P253, DOI 10.1080/22797254.2019.1582840
   Tapley BD, 2004, SCIENCE, V305, P503, DOI 10.1126/science.1099192
   Torres R, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V120, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.028
   UNOCHA, 2020, KEN FLOODS FLASH UPD
   Vrieling A, 2008, PROC SPIE, V7104, DOI 10.1117/12.799824
   Vrieling A, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P455, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0049-1
   Wan ZM, 2014, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V140, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.027
   Wheeler T, 2013, SCIENCE, V341, P508, DOI 10.1126/science.1239402
   Wulder MA, 2014, NATURE, V513, P30, DOI 10.1038/513030a
   Wulder MA, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V122, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.010
NR 54
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 0
U2 1
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2624-9553
J9 FRONT CLIM
JI Front. Clim.
PD FEB 9
PY 2021
VL 2
AR 583509
DI 10.3389/fclim.2020.583509
PG 16
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA L4XC1
UT WOS:001023300700001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Freitas, PHF
   Wang, YC
   Yan, P
   Oliveira, HR
   Schenkel, FS
   Zhang, Y
   Xu, Q
   Brito, LF
AF Freitas, Pedro H. F.
   Wang, Yachun
   Yan, Ping
   Oliveira, Hinayah R.
   Schenkel, Flavio S.
   Zhang, Yi
   Xu, Qing
   Brito, Luiz F.
TI Genetic Diversity and Signatures of Selection for Thermal Stress in
   Cattle and Other Two <i>Bos</i> Species Adapted to Divergent Climatic
   Conditions
SO FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
LA English
DT Article
DE cold stress; climate resilience; genetic resources; heat stress; heat
   tolerance; selective sweep
AB Understanding the biological mechanisms of climatic adaptation is of paramount importance for the optimization of breeding programs and conservation of genetic resources. The aim of this study was to investigate genetic diversity and unravel genomic regions potentially under selection for heat and/or cold tolerance in thirty-two worldwide cattle breeds, with a focus on Chinese local cattle breeds adapted to divergent climatic conditions, Datong yak (Bos grunniens; YAK), and Bali (Bos javanicus) based on dense SNP data. In general, moderate genetic diversity levels were observed in most cattle populations. The proportion of polymorphic SNP ranged from 0.197 (YAK) to 0.992 (Mongolian cattle). Observed and expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.023 (YAK) to 0.366 (Sanhe cattle; SH), and from 0.021 (YAK) to 0.358 (SH), respectively. The overall average inbreeding (+/- SD) was: 0.118 +/- 0.028, 0.228 +/- 0.059, 0.194 +/- 0.041, and 0.021 +/- 0.004 based on the observed versus expected number of homozygous genotypes, excess of homozygosity, correlation between uniting gametes, and runs of homozygosity (ROH), respectively. Signatures of selection based on multiple scenarios and methods (F-ST, HapFLK, and ROH) revealed important genomic regions and candidate genes. The candidate genes identified are related to various biological processes and pathways such as heat-shock proteins, oxygen transport, anatomical traits, mitochondrial DNA maintenance, metabolic activity, feed intake, carcass conformation, fertility, and reproduction. This highlights the large number of biological processes involved in thermal tolerance and thus, the polygenic nature of climatic resilience. A comprehensive description of genetic diversity measures in Chinese cattle and YAK was carried out and compared to 24 worldwide cattle breeds to avoid potential biases. Numerous genomic regions under positive selection were detected using three signature of selection methods and candidate genes potentially under positive selection were identified. Enriched function analyses pinpointed important biological pathways, molecular function and cellular components, which contribute to a better understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying thermal tolerance in cattle. Based on the large number of genomic regions identified, thermal tolerance has a complex polygenic inheritance nature, which was expected considering the various mechanisms involved in thermal stress response.
C1 [Freitas, Pedro H. F.; Oliveira, Hinayah R.; Brito, Luiz F.] Purdue Univ, Dept Anim Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
   [Wang, Yachun; Zhang, Yi] China Agr Univ, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, MARA Natl Engn Lab Anim Breeding, Key Lab Anim Genet Breeding & Reprod, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Yan, Ping] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Lanzhou Inst Husb & Pharmaceut Sci, Lanzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Oliveira, Hinayah R.; Schenkel, Flavio S.] Univ Guelph, Ctr Genet Improvement Livestock, Dept Anim Biosci, Guelph, ON, Canada.
   [Xu, Qing] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Coll Life Sci & Bioengn, Sch Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.
C3 Purdue University System; Purdue University; China Agricultural
   University; Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Lanzhou Institute
   of Husbandry & Pharmaceutical Sciences, CAAS; University of Guelph;
   Beijing Jiaotong University
RP Brito, LF (corresponding author), Purdue Univ, Dept Anim Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.; Zhang, Y (corresponding author), China Agr Univ, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, MARA Natl Engn Lab Anim Breeding, Key Lab Anim Genet Breeding & Reprod, Beijing, Peoples R China.; Xu, Q (corresponding author), Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Coll Life Sci & Bioengn, Sch Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.
EM zhangyi@cau.edu.cn; qingxu@bjtu.edu.cn; britol@purdue.edu
RI Zhang, Yi/HMO-7379-2023; Schenkel, Flavio/ABG-1842-2021
OI Ferreira Freitas, Pedro Henrique/0009-0006-6276-389X; Schenkel,
   Flavio/0000-0001-8700-0633; Brito, Luiz Fernando/0000-0002-5819-0922
FU Research Fund for International Young Scientists by the National Natural
   Science Foundation of China [31750110459]; China Agriculture Research
   System [CARS-36]; Program for Changjiang Scholar, and Innovation
   Research Team in University [IRT_15R62]
FX This work was supported by the Research Fund for International Young
   Scientists by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant
   Number: 31750110459), China Agriculture Research System (CARS-36), the
   Program for Changjiang Scholar, and Innovation Research Team in
   University (IRT_15R62).
NR 0
TC 42
Z9 43
U1 2
U2 24
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 1664-8021
J9 FRONT GENET
JI Front. Genet.
PD FEB 3
PY 2021
VL 12
AR 604823
DI 10.3389/fgene.2021.604823
PG 25
WC Genetics & Heredity
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Genetics & Heredity
GA QI0RC
UT WOS:000618681700001
PM 33613634
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Castander-Olarieta, A
   Montalbán, IA
   Oliveira, ED
   Dell'Aversana, E
   D'Amelia, L
   Carillo, P
   Steiner, N
   Fraga, HPD
   Guerra, MP
   Goicoa, T
   Ugarte, MD
   Pereira, C
   Moncaleán, P
AF Castander-Olarieta, Ander
   Montalban, Itziar A.
   Oliveira, Eliana De Medeiros
   Dell'Aversana, Emilia
   D'Amelia, Luisa
   Carillo, Petronia
   Steiner, Neusa
   De Freitas Fraga, Hugo Pacheco
   Guerra, Miguel Pedro
   Goicoa, Tomas
   Ugarte, Maria Dolores
   Pereira, Catia
   Moncalean, Paloma
TI Effect of Thermal Stress on Tissue Ultrastructure and Metabolite
   Profiles During Initiation of Radiata Pine Somatic Embryogenesis
SO FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE amino acids; Pinus radiata; proteins; somatic embryo; sugars;
   temperature; transmission electron microscopy
ID FREE AMINO-ACIDS; CLIMATIC ADAPTATION; TEMPERATURE STRESS; EPIGENETIC
   MEMORY; FREE PROLINE; PICEA-ABIES; HIGH LIGHT; DROUGHT; ACCUMULATION;
   MATURATION
AB Climate change will inevitably lead to environmental variations, thus plant drought tolerance will be a determinant factor in the success of plantations and natural forestry recovery. Some metabolites, such as soluble carbohydrates and amino acids, have been described as being the key to both embryogenesis efficiency and abiotic stress response, contributing to phenotypic plasticity and the adaptive capacity of plants. For this reason, our main objectives were to evaluate if the temperature during embryonal mass initiation in radiata pine was critical to the success of somatic embryogenesis, to alter the morphological and ultrastructural organization of embryonal masses at cellular level and to modify the carbohydrate, protein, or amino acid contents. The first SE initiation experiments were carried out at moderate and high temperatures for periods of different durations prior to transfer to the control temperature of 23 degrees C. Cultures initiated at moderate temperatures (30 degrees C, 4 weeks and 40 degrees C, 4 days) showed significantly lower initiation and proliferation rates than those at the control temperature or pulse treatment at high temperatures (50 degrees C, 5 min). No significant differences were observed either for the percentage of embryogenic cell lines that produced somatic embryos, or for the number of somatic embryos per gram of embryonal mass. Based on the results from the first experiments, initiation was carried out at 40 degrees C 4 h; 50 degrees C, 30 min; and a pulse treatment of 60 degrees C, 5 min. No significant differences were found for the initiation or number of established lines or for the maturation of somatic embryos. However, large morphological differences were observed in the mature somatic embryos. At the same time, changes observed at cellular level suggested that strong heat shock treatments may trigger the programmed cell death of embryogenic cells, leading to an early loss of embryogenic potential, and the formation of supernumerary suspensor cells. Finally, among all the differences observed in the metabolic profile, it is worth highlighting the accumulation of tyrosine and isoleucine, both amino acids involved in the synthesis of abiotic stress response-related secondary metabolites.
C1 [Castander-Olarieta, Ander; Montalban, Itziar A.; Moncalean, Paloma] Neiker Tecnalia, Ctr Arkaute, Vitoria, Spain.
   [Oliveira, Eliana De Medeiros] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Cent Lab Electron Microscopy, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil.
   [Dell'Aversana, Emilia; D'Amelia, Luisa; Carillo, Petronia] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Environm Biol & Pharmaceut Sci & Technol, Naples, Italy.
   [Steiner, Neusa] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Bot, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil.
   [De Freitas Fraga, Hugo Pacheco] Univ Fed Parana, Dept Bot, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil.
   [Guerra, Miguel Pedro] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Lab Fisiol Desenvolvimento & Genet Vegetal, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil.
   [Goicoa, Tomas; Ugarte, Maria Dolores] Univ Publ Navarra, Dept Stat Comp Sci & Math, Pamplona, Spain.
   [Pereira, Catia] Univ Coimbra, Dept Life Sci, Coimbra, Portugal.
C3 Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC); Universita della Campania
   Vanvitelli; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC); Universidade
   Federal do Parana; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC);
   Universidad Publica de Navarra; Universidade de Coimbra
RP Moncaleán, P (corresponding author), Neiker Tecnalia, Ctr Arkaute, Vitoria, Spain.
EM pmoncalean@neiker.eus
RI Steiner, Neusa/ABG-3512-2020; Fraga, Hugo/L-7275-2019; Goicoa,
   Tomas/J-8848-2014; Ugarte, Maria Dolores/J-8834-2014; Carillo,
   Petronia/A-6052-2010
OI D'Amelia, Luisa/0000-0001-7808-5997; Castander-Olarieta,
   Ander/0000-0001-5062-7731; Leite Pereira, Catia
   Sofia/0000-0002-1033-8270; Moncalean, Paloma/0000-0003-0143-4647;
   Goicoa, Tomas/0000-0002-0588-0137; Ugarte, Maria
   Dolores/0000-0002-3505-8400; Carillo, Petronia/0000-0003-3723-0398;
   Montalban, Itziar Aurora/0000-0002-1868-5058
FU MINECO (Spanish Government) project [AGL2016-76143-C4-3R]; CYTED
   [P117RT0522]; DECO (Basque Government)
FX This research was funded by MINECO (Spanish Government) project
   (AGL2016-76143-C4-3R), CYTED (P117RT0522), and DECO (Basque Government,
   "Ayudas de formacion a jovenes investigadores y tecnologos").
CR Abrahamsson M, 2012, PLANT CELL TISS ORG, V109, P391, DOI 10.1007/s11240-011-0103-8
   Ahuja I, 2010, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V15, P664, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.002
   [Anonymous], GREENHOUSE
   AUGUSTI A, 1999, ECOSYSTEM RESPONSE C, P117
   Bandurska H, 2009, DENDROBIOLOGY, V62, P3
   BATES LS, 1973, PLANT SOIL, V39, P205, DOI 10.1007/BF00018060
   BENJAMINI Y, 1995, J R STAT SOC B, V57, P289, DOI 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
   Boyko A, 2008, ENVIRON MOL MUTAGEN, V49, P61, DOI 10.1002/em.20347
   BRADFORD MM, 1976, ANAL BIOCHEM, V72, P248, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
   Bräutigam K, 2013, ECOL EVOL, V3, P399, DOI 10.1002/ece3.461
   Breton D, 2006, PLANT CELL TISS ORG, V87, P95, DOI 10.1007/s11240-006-9144-9
   Burg MB, 2008, J BIOL CHEM, V283, P7309, DOI 10.1074/jbc.R700042200
   Campalans A, 1999, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V37, P327, DOI 10.1016/S0981-9428(99)80039-4
   Carillo P., 2011, Extraction and Determination of Proline
   Carillo P, 2012, FOOD CHEM, V133, P1264, DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.08.088
   Carillo P, 2011, FUNCT PLANT BIOL, V38, P139, DOI 10.1071/FP10177
   Carneros E, 2017, PLANT CELL TISS ORG, V131, P445, DOI 10.1007/s11240-017-1296-2
   Conrath U, 2015, ANNU REV PHYTOPATHOL, V53, P97, DOI 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080614-120132
   Corcuera L, 2012, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V26, P799, DOI 10.1007/s00468-011-0651-x
   DaMatta Fábio M., 2006, Braz. J. Plant Physiol., V18, P55, DOI 10.1590/S1677-04202006000100006
   Davies WJ, 2011, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V149, P123, DOI 10.1017/S0021859610001115
   De Diego N, 2015, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V188, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.08.006
   DELAUNEY AJ, 1993, PLANT J, V4, P215, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.04020215.x
   DORMLING I, 1992, CAN J FOREST RES, V22, P88, DOI 10.1139/x92-013
   Dronne S, 1997, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V99, P433, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1997.990311.x
   Dungey HS, 2009, SILVAE GENET, V58, P28, DOI 10.1515/sg-2009-0004
   Eliásová K, 2017, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V31, P1279, DOI 10.1007/s00468-017-1547-1
   Escandón M, 2017, J EXP BOT, V68, P3629, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erx198
   ESPINEL S, 1995, ANN SCI FOREST, V52, P515, DOI 10.1051/forest:19950510
   Falahi H, 2018, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V147, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.11.003
   Fehér A, 2003, PLANT CELL TISS ORG, V74, P201, DOI 10.1023/A:1024033216561
   Fehér A, 2015, BBA-GENE REGUL MECH, V1849, P385, DOI 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.07.005
   Filonova LH, 2000, J CELL SCI, V113, P4399
   Fraga HPF, 2015, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V29, P1613, DOI 10.1007/s00468-015-1244-x
   García-Mendiguren O, 2017, ACTA HORTIC, V1155, P77, DOI [10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1155.10, 10.17660/actahortic.2017.1155.10]
   García-Mendiguren O, 2016, PLANT BIOTECHNOL-NAR, V33, P143, DOI 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.16.0520a
   García-Mendiguren O, 2016, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V30, P949, DOI 10.1007/s00468-015-1336-7
   Hargreaves CL, 2002, PLANT CELL REP, V21, P40, DOI 10.1007/s00299-002-0478-4
   Jia JB, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/srep43215
   Johnsen O, 2005, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V28, P1090, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01356.x
   JONES MGK, 1977, PLANT PHYSIOL, V60, P379, DOI 10.1104/pp.60.3.379
   Joshi V, 2010, AMINO ACIDS, V39, P933, DOI 10.1007/s00726-010-0505-7
   Krasensky J, 2012, J EXP BOT, V63, P1593, DOI 10.1093/jxb/err460
   Kvaalen H, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V177, P49, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02222.x
   Li J, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep38401
   Mena-Petite A, 2004, ANN FOREST SCI, V61, P695, DOI 10.1051/forest:2004060
   Merino I, 2018, TREE GENET GENOMES, V14, DOI 10.1007/s11295-018-1247-z
   Montalbán IA, 2019, J FORESTRY RES, V30, P65, DOI 10.1007/s11676-018-0618-5
   Montalbán IA, 2015, NEW FOREST, V46, P309, DOI 10.1007/s11056-014-9457-1
   Montalbán IA, 2012, ACTA PHYSIOL PLANT, V34, P451, DOI 10.1007/s11738-011-0841-6
   Montalbán IA, 2010, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V24, P1061, DOI 10.1007/s00468-010-0477-y
   Montalbán IA, 2017, CRYOLETTERS, V38, P202
   Moradi P, 2017, ANAL BIOCHEM, V527, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.ab.2017.02.006
   Morel A, 2014, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V152, P184, DOI 10.1111/ppl.12158
   Nambara E, 1998, PLANT CELL PHYSIOL, V39, P853, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029444
   Nuccio ML, 1999, CURR OPIN PLANT BIOL, V2, P128, DOI 10.1016/S1369-5266(99)80026-0
   Park YS, 2002, ANN FOR SCI, V59, P651, DOI 10.1051/forest:2002051
   Patakas A, 2002, PLANT SCI, V163, P361, DOI 10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00140-1
   Pereira C., 2017, FOREST SYST, V26, P1
   Pereira C, 2016, J FOREST RES-JPN, V21, P143, DOI 10.1007/s10310-016-0524-7
   Pietrini F, 1999, AUST J PLANT PHYSIOL, V26, P367, DOI 10.1071/PP98151
   Pullman GS, 2003, PLANT CELL REP, V21, P747, DOI 10.1007/s00299-003-0586-9
   REYNOLDS ES, 1963, J CELL BIOL, V17, P208, DOI 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208
   Santa-Catarina C., 2012, Current Topics in Plant Biology, Volume 13, P103
   SHEN L, 1989, J EXP BOT, V40, P71, DOI 10.1093/jxb/40.1.71
   SINGH BK, 1995, PLANT CELL, V7, P935
   Smertenko A, 2014, J EXP BOT, V65, P1343, DOI 10.1093/jxb/eru005
   Smith DR, 1997, PLANT TISSUE CULT BI, V3, P63
   Spinoni J, 2018, INT J CLIMATOL, V38, P1718, DOI 10.1002/joc.5291
   SPURR AR, 1969, J ULTRA MOL STRUCT R, V26, P31, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5320(69)90033-1
   Steiner N, 2016, PROTOPLASMA, V253, P487, DOI 10.1007/s00709-015-0827-0
   Taïbi K, 2015, ECOL ENG, V84, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.09.005
   Taylor NL, 2004, PLANT PHYSIOL, V134, P838, DOI 10.1104/pp.103.035675
   Villar-Salvador P, 2004, TREE PHYSIOL, V24, P1147, DOI 10.1093/treephys/24.10.1147
   Walter Christian, 2005, V77, P11
   WELCH WJ, 1985, J CELL BIOL, V101, P1198, DOI 10.1083/jcb.101.4.1198
   Woodrow P, 2017, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V159, P290, DOI 10.1111/ppl.12513
   Yakovlev IA, 2016, PLANTA, V243, P1237, DOI 10.1007/s00425-016-2484-8
   Yakovlev IA, 2011, PLANT SCI, V180, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.07.004
   Zas R, 2013, HEREDITY, V111, P248, DOI 10.1038/hdy.2013.44
   Zavattieri Maria Amely, 2010, Electron. J. Biotechnol., V13, P12, DOI 10.2225/vol13-issue1-fulltext-4
NR 81
TC 30
Z9 30
U1 3
U2 18
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
SN 1664-462X
J9 FRONT PLANT SCI
JI Front. Plant Sci.
PD JAN 17
PY 2019
VL 9
AR 2004
DI 10.3389/fpls.2018.02004
PG 16
WC Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences
GA HH8IN
UT WOS:000455975200001
PM 30705684
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wigand, C
   Sundberg, K
   Hanson, A
   Davey, E
   Johnson, R
   Watson, E
   Morris, J
AF Wigand, C.
   Sundberg, K.
   Hanson, A.
   Davey, E.
   Johnson, R.
   Watson, E.
   Morris, J.
TI Varying Inundation Regimes Differentially Affect Natural and
   Sand-Amended Marsh Sediments
SO PLOS ONE
LA English
DT Article
ID SEA-LEVEL RISE; COASTAL SALT-MARSH; TIDAL MARSH; SPARTINA-ALTERNIFLORA;
   VEGETATION CHANGE; DREDGED MATERIAL; NORTH-CAROLINA; BRACKISH MARSH;
   NEW-ENGLAND; SOIL
AB Climate change is altering sea level rise rates and precipitation patterns worldwide. Coastal wetlands are vulnerable to these changes. System responses to stressors are important for resource managers and environmental stewards to understand in order to best manage them. Thin layer sand or sediment application to drowning and eroding marshes is one approach to build elevation and resilience. The above-and below-ground structure, soil carbon dioxide emissions, and pore water constituents in vegetated natural marsh sediments and sand-amended sediments were examined at varying inundation regimes between mean sea level and mean high water (0.82 m NAVD88 to 1.49 m NAVD88) in a field experiment at Laws Point, part of the Plum Island Sound Estuary (MA). Significantly lower salinities, pH, sulfides, phosphates, and ammonium were measured in the sand-amended sediments than in the natural sediments. In natural sediments there was a pattern of increasing salinity with increasing elevation while in the sand-amended sediments the trend was reversed, showing decreasing salinity with increasing elevation. Sulfide concentrations generally increased from low to high inundation with highest concentrations at the highest inundation (i. e., at the lowest elevations). High pore water phosphate concentrations were measured at low elevations in the natural sediments, but the sand-amended treatments had mostly low concentrations of phosphate and no consistent pattern with elevation. At the end of the experiment the lowest elevations generally had the highest measures of pore water ammonium. Soil carbon dioxide emissions were greatest in the sandamended mesocosms and at higher elevations. Differences in coarse root and rhizome abundances and volumes among the sediment treatments were detected with CT imaging, but by 20 weeks the natural and sand-amended treatments showed similar total belowground biomass at the intermediate and high elevations. Although differences in pore water nutrient concentrations, pH, salinity, and belowground root and rhizome morphology were detected between the natural and sand-amended sediments, similar belowground productivity and total biomass were measured by the end of the growing season. Since the belowground productivity supports organic matter accumulation and peat buildup in marshes, our results suggest that thin layer sand or sediment application is a viable climate adaptation action to build elevation and coastal resiliency, especially in areas with low natural sediment supplies.
C1 [Wigand, C.; Hanson, A.; Davey, E.; Johnson, R.; Watson, E.] US EPA, Atlantic Ecol Div, ORD NHEERL, Narragansett, RI USA.
   [Sundberg, K.; Morris, J.] Univ South Carolina, Belle W Baruch Inst Marine & Coastal Sci, Columbia, SC USA.
   [Sundberg, K.; Morris, J.] Univ South Carolina, Dept Biol Sci, Columbia, SC USA.
   [Watson, E.] Drexel Univ, Acad Nat Sci, Biodivers Earth & Environm Sci Dept, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
C3 United States Environmental Protection Agency; University of South
   Carolina System; University of South Carolina Columbia; University of
   South Carolina System; University of South Carolina Columbia; Drexel
   University
RP Wigand, C (corresponding author), US EPA, Atlantic Ecol Div, ORD NHEERL, Narragansett, RI USA.
EM wigand.cathleen@epa.gov
RI Watson, Elizabeth/N-1638-2019; morris, james/ABC-8111-2020
OI Watson, Elizabeth/0000-0002-8496-1647; Morris, James/0000-0002-0511-642X
FU NSF [OCE 1058747, OCE 123821]
FX This work was supported by NSF #OCE 1058747 and #OCE 123821 (J. Morris);
   The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis,
   decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
CR ACOE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers), 2014, FACT SHEET MARSH ISL
   [Anonymous], CLIM CHANG LETT
   [Anonymous], 1972, BULLETIN
   Bayard TS, 2011, AUK, V128, P393, DOI 10.1525/auk.2011.10178
   Blum LK, 2013, OCEANOGRAPHY, V26, P85, DOI 10.5670/oceanog.2013.49
   CAHOON DR, 1988, COAST MANAGE, V16, P341, DOI 10.1080/08920758809362067
   Callaway J.C., 1996, Current Topics in Wetland Biochemistry, V2, P2
   CLINE JD, 1969, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V14, P454, DOI 10.4319/lo.1969.14.3.0454
   Craft C, 2003, ECOL APPL, V13, P1417, DOI 10.1890/02-5086
   Croft AL, 2006, ESTUARIES COASTS, V29, P737, DOI 10.1007/BF02786525
   Davey E, 2011, ECOL APPL, V21, P2156, DOI 10.1890/10-2037.1
   DELAUNE RD, 1981, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V13, P533, DOI 10.1016/0038-0717(81)90045-6
   DNREC (Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control), 2013, COASTAL CONNECTION, V7
   Fagherazzi S, 2009, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V114, DOI 10.1029/2008JF001139
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE 2014 CHANGE
   Ford MA, 1999, ECOL ENG, V12, P189, DOI 10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00061-5
   Frame G.W., 2006, People, Places, and Parks: Proceedings of the 2005 George Wright Society Conference on Parks, Protected Areas, and Cultural Sites, P123
   Frame GW, 2007, 88685 PMIS NAT PARK
   Frumhoff PC, 2007, CONFRONTING CLIMATE
   Gedan KB, 2011, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V434, P229, DOI 10.3354/meps09084
   GIBSON KD, 1994, ECOL APPL, V4, P757, DOI 10.2307/1942006
   Gjerdrum C, 2008, AUK, V125, P608, DOI 10.1525/auk.2008.07029
   Kearney MS, 2011, WETL ECOL MANAG, V19, P373, DOI 10.1007/s11273-011-9222-6
   Kirwan ML, 2015, ECOSYSTEMS, V18, P903, DOI 10.1007/s10021-015-9870-0
   Kirwan ML, 2013, NATURE, V504, P53, DOI 10.1038/nature12856
   Kirwan ML, 2012, J ECOL, V100, P764, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.01957.x
   KOCH MS, 1989, J ECOL, V77, P565, DOI 10.2307/2260770
   KOCH MS, 1990, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V35, P399, DOI 10.4319/lo.1990.35.2.0399
   Mendelssohn IA, 2003, ECOL ENG, V21, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2003.09.006
   MENDELSSOHN IA, 1988, J ECOL, V76, P509, DOI 10.2307/2260609
   Morris JT, 2013, WETLANDS, V33, P975, DOI 10.1007/s13157-013-0480-3
   Morris JT, 2013, OCEANOGRAPHY, V26, P78, DOI 10.5670/oceanog.2013.48
   Morris JT, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P2869, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2869:ROCWTR]2.0.CO;2
   Nelson JL, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0038558
   NPS (US National Park Service), 2007, 8865FY200305 NPS PMI
   Portnoy JW, 1997, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V36, P275, DOI 10.1023/A:1005715520988
   Portnoy JW, 1999, ENVIRON MANAGE, V24, P111, DOI 10.1007/s002679900219
   Portnoy JW, 1997, ECOL APPL, V7, P1054, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[1054:BEOSRT]2.0.CO;2
   Rafferty P., 2010, Park Sci, V27, P34
   Ray G.L., 2007, THIN LAYER DISPOSAL
   Reimold RJ, 1978, D7838 USA ENG WAT EX
   Sallenger AH, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P884, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1597, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1597]
   Slocum MG, 2005, ESTUARIES, V28, P519, DOI 10.1007/BF02696063
   Smith SM, 2015, WETLANDS, V35, P127, DOI 10.1007/s13157-014-0601-7
   TEAL JM, 1966, J EXP BOT, V17, P355, DOI 10.1093/jxb/17.2.355
   Temmerman S, 2004, MAR GEOL, V212, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.margeo.2004.10.021
   Temmerman S, 2012, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V92-93, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.06.001
   US FWS (US Fish and Wildlife Service). Rhode Island National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 2015, MAID FORD SALT MARSH
   VALIELA I, 1976, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V21, P245, DOI 10.4319/lo.1976.21.2.0245
   Voss CM, 2013, MAR BIOL, V160, P181, DOI 10.1007/s00227-012-2076-5
   WARREN RS, 1993, ECOLOGY, V74, P96, DOI 10.2307/1939504
   Warren RS, 2002, RESTOR ECOL, V10, P497, DOI 10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002.01031.x
   Watson EB, 2017, ESTUAR COAST, V40, P617, DOI [10.1007/s12237-016-0166-1, 10.1007/s12237-016-0069-1]
   Watson EB, 2016, BIOL CONSERV, V196, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.011
   Watson EB, 2015, AQUAT BOT, V121, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.aquabot.2014.10.012
   Watson EB, 2015, BOTANY, V93, P671, DOI 10.1139/cjb-2015-0055
   Wehner MF, 2004, J CLIMATE, V17, P4281, DOI 10.1175/JCLI3197.1
   Weston NB, 2014, ESTUAR COAST, V37, P1, DOI 10.1007/s12237-013-9654-8
   Wigand C, 2008, SPRINGER SER ENV MAN, P499, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-35299-2_17
   Wigand Cathleen, 2017, Estuaries Coast, V40, P682
   Wigand C, 2014, ECOL APPL, V24, P633, DOI 10.1890/13-0594.1
   Wigand C, 2009, WETLANDS, V29, P952, DOI 10.1672/08-147.1
   Wong JXW, 2015, MAR ENVIRON RES, V104, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.marenvres.2014.12.003
NR 63
TC 20
Z9 27
U1 0
U2 44
PU PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
PI SAN FRANCISCO
PA 1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA
SN 1932-6203
J9 PLOS ONE
JI PLoS One
PD OCT 27
PY 2016
VL 11
IS 10
AR e0164956
DI 10.1371/journal.pone.0164956
PG 24
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA EE4VY
UT WOS:000389604900036
PM 27788165
OA Green Published, gold, Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Tjoelker, MG
   Oleksyn, J
   Reich, PB
   Zytkowiak, R
AF Tjoelker, Mark G.
   Oleksyn, Jacek
   Reich, Peter B.
   Zytkowiak, Roma
TI Coupling of respiration, nitrogen, and sugars underlies convergent
   temperature acclimation in <i>Pinus banksiana</i> across wide-ranging
   sites and populations
SO GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE acclimation; adaptation; biogeography; carbohydrates; climate change;
   common garden; dark respiration; intraspecific variation; jack pine
   (Pinus banksiana); nitrogen
ID LEAF DARK RESPIRATION; FALL FROST-RESISTANCE; PLANT RESPIRATION; ROOT
   RESPIRATION; THERMAL-ACCLIMATION; NEEDLE RESPIRATION;
   SEASONAL-VARIATION; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CARBON-DIOXIDE; CLIMATE-CHANGE
AB Patterns and mechanisms of short-term temperature acclimation and long-term climatic adaptation of respiration among intraspecific populations are poorly understood, but both are potentially important in constraining respiratory carbon flux to climate warming across large geographic scales, as well as influencing the metabolic fitness of populations. Herein we report on leaf dark respiration of 33-year-old trees of jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) grown in three contrasting North American common gardens (0.9, 4.6, and 7.9 degrees C, mean annual temperature) comprised of identical populations of wide-ranging geographic origins. We tested whether respiration rates in this evergreen conifer acclimate to prevailing ambient air temperatures and differ among populations. At each of the common gardens, observed population differences in respiration rates measured at a standard temperature (20 degrees C) were comparatively small and largely unrelated to climate of seed-source origin. In contrast, respiration in all populations exhibited seasonal acclimation at all sites. Specific respiration rates at 20 degrees C inversely tracked seasonal variation in ambient air temperature, increasing with cooler temperatures in fall and declining with warmer temperatures in spring and summer. Such responses were similar among populations and sites, thus providing a general predictive equation regarding temperature acclimation of respiration for the species. Temperature acclimation was associated with variation in nitrogen (N) and soluble carbohydrate concentrations, supporting a joint enzyme and substrate-based model of respiratory acclimation. Regression analyses revealed convergent relationships between respiration and the combination of needle N and soluble carbohydrate concentrations and between N-based respiration (R-N, mu mol mol N- 1 s(- 1)) and soluble carbohydrate concentrations, providing evidence for general predictive relationships across geographically diverse populations, seasons, and sites. Overall, these findings demonstrate that seasonal acclimation of respiration modulates rates of foliar respiratory carbon flux in a widely distributed evergreen species, and does so in a predictable way. Genetic differences in specific respiration rate appear less important than temperature acclimation in downregulating respiratory carbon fluxes with climate warming across wide-ranging sites.
C1 [Tjoelker, Mark G.] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Ecosyst Sci & Management, College Stn, TX 77483 USA.
   [Oleksyn, Jacek; Reich, Peter B.] Univ Minnesota, Dept Forest Resources, St Paul, MN 55108 USA.
   [Oleksyn, Jacek; Zytkowiak, Roma] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Dendrol, PL-62035 Kornik, Poland.
C3 Texas A&M University System; Texas A&M University College Station;
   University of Minnesota System; University of Minnesota Twin Cities;
   Polish Academy of Sciences
RP Tjoelker, MG (corresponding author), Texas A&M Univ, Dept Ecosyst Sci & Management, College Stn, TX 77483 USA.
EM m-tjoelker@tamu.edu
RI Reich, Paul/D-4321-2013; Oleksyn, Jacek/AAR-2351-2020; Tjoelker,
   Mark/M-2413-2016
OI Zytkowiak, Roma/0000-0003-1024-8694; Reich, Peter/0000-0003-4424-662X;
   Tjoelker, Mark/0000-0003-4607-5238; Oleksyn, Jacek/0000-0002-6576-3258
CR Amthor JS, 2000, ANN BOT-LONDON, V86, P1, DOI 10.1006/anbo.2000.1175
   [Anonymous], WO38 USDA FOR SERV
   Armstrong AF, 2006, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V29, P940, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01475.x
   Atkin OK, 2005, ADV PHOTO RESPIRAT, V18, P95
   Atkin OK, 2005, FUNCT PLANT BIOL, V32, P87, DOI 10.1071/FP03176
   Atkin OK, 2000, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V23, P15, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00511.x
   Atkin OK, 2003, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V8, P343, DOI 10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00136-5
   AZCONBIETO J, 1983, PLANT PHYSIOL, V72, P598, DOI 10.1104/pp.72.3.598
   BILLINGS W D, 1971, Arctic and Alpine Research, V3, P277
   Bolstad PV, 2003, TREE PHYSIOL, V23, P969, DOI 10.1093/treephys/23.14.969
   Bruhn D, 2007, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V13, P1216, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01351.x
   Burton AJ, 2002, OECOLOGIA, V131, P559, DOI 10.1007/s00442-002-0931-7
   Covey-Crump EM, 2002, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V25, P1501, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00932.x
   Cox PM, 2000, NATURE, V408, P184, DOI 10.1038/35041539
   Davidson EA, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P154, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01065.x
   Davis MB, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P673, DOI 10.1126/science.292.5517.673
   Dewar RC, 1999, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V5, P615, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00253.x
   FARRAR JF, 1991, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V14, P819, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01445.x
   Gifford RM, 2003, FUNCT PLANT BIOL, V30, P171, DOI 10.1071/FP02083
   Griffin KL, 2002, NEW PHYTOL, V154, P609, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00410.x
   Gunderson CA, 2000, TREE PHYSIOL, V20, P87
   HAISSIG BE, 1979, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V47, P151, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1979.tb03207.x
   HANSEN J, 1975, ANAL BIOCHEM, V68, P87, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(75)90682-X
   King AW, 2006, SCIENCE, V312, P536, DOI 10.1126/science.1114166
   LARIGAUDERIE A, 1995, ANN BOT-LONDON, V76, P245, DOI 10.1006/anbo.1995.1093
   Lavigne MB, 1996, TREE PHYSIOL, V16, P847
   LEDIG FT, 1983, AM J BOT, V70, P256, DOI 10.2307/2443271
   Lee TD, 2005, FUNCT ECOL, V19, P640, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.01023.x
   Loveys BR, 2003, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V9, P895, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00611.x
   Luo YQ, 2001, NATURE, V413, P622, DOI 10.1038/35098065
   MATYAS C, 1992, SILVAE GENET, V41, P370
   Mitchell KA, 1999, TREE PHYSIOL, V19, P861
   MOONEY HA, 1961, ECOL MONOGR, V31, P1, DOI 10.2307/1950744
   Ogren E, 1997, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V20, P247, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-56.x
   Ögren E, 1999, TREE PHYSIOL, V19, P755
   Ögren E, 1999, TREE PHYSIOL, V19, P749
   Oleksyn J, 2000, TREE PHYSIOL, V20, P837
   Oleksyn J, 1998, FUNCT ECOL, V12, P573, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00236.x
   Rehfeldt GE, 1999, ECOL MONOGR, V69, P375, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0375:GRTCIP]2.0.CO;2
   Reich PB, 2006, NATURE, V439, P457, DOI 10.1038/nature04282
   Reich PB, 1996, FUNCT ECOL, V10, P768, DOI 10.2307/2390512
   Reich PB, 1998, OECOLOGIA, V114, P471, DOI 10.1007/s004420050471
   ROOK D A, 1969, New Zealand Journal of Botany, V7, P43
   RYAN MG, 1995, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V18, P765, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00579.x
   RYAN MG, 1991, ECOL APPL, V1, P157, DOI 10.2307/1941808
   [Solomon S. IPCC IPCC], 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007
   Stockfors J, 1998, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V12, P130, DOI 10.1007/s004680050131
   STRAIN BR, 1966, ECOLOGY, V47, P1043, DOI 10.2307/1935653
   Teskey RO, 1999, TREE PHYSIOL, V19, P519, DOI 10.1093/treephys/19.8.519
   Tjoelker MG, 1999, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V22, P767, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00435.x
   Tjoelker MG, 2005, NEW PHYTOL, V167, P493, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01428.x
   Tjoelker MG, 1999, GLOB CHANGE BIOL, V5, P679, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00257.x
   Turnbull MH, 2002, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V25, P1729, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00947.x
   Valentini R, 2000, NATURE, V404, P861, DOI 10.1038/35009084
   Vose JM, 2002, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V8, P182, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00464.x
   Walters MB, 2000, FUNCT ECOL, V14, P155, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00415.x
   Weih M, 2001, NEW PHYTOL, V150, P147, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00078.x
   Whitehead D, 2004, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V10, P925, DOI 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00739.x
   Wright IJ, 2004, NATURE, V428, P821, DOI 10.1038/nature02403
   Wright IJ, 2006, NEW PHYTOL, V169, P309, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01590.x
   Wythers KR, 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V11, P435, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00922.x
   Xu CY, 2006, FUNCT ECOL, V20, P778, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01161.x
   Xu CY, 2007, OECOLOGIA, V153, P809, DOI 10.1007/s00442-007-0790-3
NR 63
TC 97
Z9 117
U1 0
U2 77
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1354-1013
EI 1365-2486
J9 GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL
JI Glob. Change Biol.
PD APR
PY 2008
VL 14
IS 4
BP 782
EP 797
DI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01548.x
PG 16
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 276FI
UT WOS:000254126300007
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Shannon, J
   Kolka, R
   Van Grinsven, M
   Liu, FJ
AF Shannon, Joseph
   Kolka, Randall
   Van Grinsven, Matthew
   Liu, Fengjing
TI Joint impacts of future climate conditions and invasive species on black
   ash forested wetlands
SO FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE
LA English
DT Article
DE black ash; climate change; stochastic weather generator; emerald ash
   borer; ecohydrology; wetland hydrology; water table; ecosystem specific
   yield
ID FRAXINUS-NIGRA; BORER MORTALITY; REGIME SHIFTS; R PACKAGE;
   EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; MINNESOTA; MODELS; TEMPERATURE; VEGETATION; HISTORY
AB Wetlands around the globe are being impacted by changing temperature and precipitation patterns. Simultaneously black ash forested wetlands are expected to lose much of their overstory canopy due to the invasive Emerald Ash Borer (EAB). Field experiments and modeling efforts have provided information on species tolerance of post-EAB conditions and future climate adapted species. No studies have yet examined the interaction of the loss of ash and future climate scenarios on wetland hydrologic conditions. We developed daily wetland hydrology models for three vegetation conditions: black ash forest, alternate non-ash forest, and non-forested. Model simulations were evaluated under current climate conditions and under two future climate scenarios representing warm & dry (T: +1.9 degrees C, P: -2.6 cm) and hot & wet (T: +8.9 degrees C, P: +6.2 cm) scenarios. For each combination of vegetation condition and climate scenario, 10,000 annual synthetic weather sequences were used as inputs to the wetland hydrology models. Simulated wetland hydrology remained highly variable based on seasonal precipitation and evaporative demand. We compared the occurrence probability of stream-network connectivity, surface inundation, and dry conditions. Effects ranged from slightly drier under non-forested and warm & dry conditions to much wetter under alternate-forested and hot & wet conditions. Non-forested conditions resulted in a median increase of 15 and 20% of daily observations of connectivity to stream networks and surface inundation, respectively, and 7% (median) fewer daily observations of dry conditions. Alternate-forested conditions resulted in larger median impacts: 40 and 35% more daily observations of connectivity to stream networks and surface inundation, respectively and 10% fewer daily observations of dry conditions. Projected climate change-induced water deficits resulted in 3-9% fewer days with connectivity and surface inundation, respectively and 0-10% more days with dry conditions (values represent the range of median values for combination of vegetation and future scenario). Our results show vegetation change as an equal or greater individual driver of future hydrologic conditions in black ash wetlands relative to climate change. Non-forested conditions and projected climate change-induced impacts each effectively negated the other. Management decisions around vegetation transition and establishment should consider the interaction with future climate scenarios and the large effect that poorly inundation-adapted plant communities could have on hydrologic conditions.
C1 [Shannon, Joseph; Van Grinsven, Matthew; Liu, Fengjing] Michigan Technol Univ, Coll Forest Resources & Environm Sci, Houghton, MI 49931 USA.
   [Shannon, Joseph] Nat Capital Exchange, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA.
   [Kolka, Randall] United States Dept Agr USDA Forest Serv, Northern Res Stn, Grand Rapids, MN USA.
   [Van Grinsven, Matthew] Northern Michigan Univ, Dept Earth Environm & Geog Sci, Marquette, MI USA.
C3 Michigan Technological University; Northern Michigan University
RP Shannon, J (corresponding author), Michigan Technol Univ, Coll Forest Resources & Environm Sci, Houghton, MI 49931 USA.; Shannon, J (corresponding author), Nat Capital Exchange, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA.
EM jpshanno@mtu.edu
RI Liu, Fengjing/AFB-2641-2022
FU U.S. Forest Service
FX Funding This work was supported by the U.S. Forest Service, Grant/Award
   Numbers: 17-JV-11 242307-133 and 21-JV-11242307-050, the Graduate School
   Finishing Fellowship, Michigan Technological University, Michigan
   Technological University Ecosystem Science Center (ESC), and the USDA
   National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) McIntire Stennis
   Project (Grant Contract Number: NI22MSCFRXXXG027, Proposal: 2109065).
CR [Anonymous], 2007, ROLE CLIMATOLOGICAL
   APHIS, 2021, IN COUNT EAB DET N A
   Arguez A, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P1687, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00197.1
   Bates D, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V67, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Bolton N, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9030146
   Brinson M. M., 1993, WRPDE4
   BRISTOW KL, 1984, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V31, P159, DOI 10.1016/0168-1923(84)90017-0
   Bürkner PC, 2018, R J, V10, P395
   Bürkner PC, 2017, J STAT SOFTW, V80, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v080.i01
   Burkett V, 2000, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V36, P313, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2000.tb04270.x
   Byun K, 2018, INT J CLIMATOL, V38, pE531, DOI 10.1002/joc.5388
   Coron L, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V94, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.05.002
   Davis JC, 2017, CAN J FOREST RES, V47, P319, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0105
   Diamond JS, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V222, P436, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.082
   Gent PR, 2011, J CLIMATE, V24, P4973, DOI 10.1175/2011JCLI4083.1
   Griffies SM, 2011, J CLIMATE, V24, P3520, DOI 10.1175/2011JCLI3964.1
   Haack RA., 2002, Newsl Mich Entomol Soc, V47, P1
   Hargreaves GH, 2003, J IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V129, P53, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2003)129:1(53)
   Hayhoe K, 2010, J GREAT LAKES RES, V36, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.jglr.2010.03.012
   Herms DA, 2014, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V59, P13, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162051
   Horel J, 2002, B AM METEOROL SOC, V83, P211, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083<0211:MCMITW>2.3.CO;2
   Hourly Precipitation Data [HPD], 2021, HOURL PREC DAT HPD N
   Iverson L, 2016, ECOSYSTEMS, V19, P248, DOI 10.1007/s10021-015-9929-y
   Kane ES, 2019, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V124, P3600, DOI 10.1029/2019JG005339
   Kolka RK, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9040179
   Krause P., 2005, ADV GEOSCIENCES, V5, P89, DOI DOI 10.5194/ADGEO-5-89-2005
   Lenth R., 2018, PACKAGE EMMEANS
   Loheide SP, 2008, ECOHYDROLOGY, V1, P59, DOI 10.1002/eco.7
   Looney CE, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V389, P352, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.12.028
   Looney CE, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V375, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.050
   Looney CE, 2015, CAN J FOREST RES, V45, P1728, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2015-0129
   McElreath R, 2016, TEXT STAT SCI, pXI
   McLaughlin DL, 2019, WATER RESOUR RES, V55, P6018, DOI 10.1029/2018WR024652
   McLaughlin DL, 2014, HYDROL PROCESS, V28, P1495, DOI 10.1002/hyp.9672
   Menne M. J., 2012, Global Historical Climatology Network - Daily (GHCN-Daily), V10, pV5D21VHZ
   Menne MJ, 2012, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V29, P897, DOI 10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00103.1
   Moomaw WR, 2018, WETLANDS, V38, P183, DOI 10.1007/s13157-018-1023-8
   Moriasi DN, 2015, T ASABE, V58, P1763
   Notaro M, 2015, J CLIMATE, V28, P1661, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00467.1
   OCHA, 2018, UN OFF COORD HUM AFF
   OSBORN HB, 1979, WATER RESOUR RES, V15, P1701, DOI 10.1029/WR015i006p01701
   Pierce DW, 2014, J HYDROMETEOROL, V15, P2558, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0082.1
   R Core Team, 2019, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
   RICHARDSON CW, 1981, WATER RESOUR RES, V17, P182, DOI 10.1029/WR017i001p00182
   Scheffer M, 2003, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V18, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.002
   Shannon J, 2022, HYDROL PROCESS, V36, DOI 10.1002/hyp.14457
   Shannon J, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9030147
   Short FT, 2016, AQUAT BOT, V135, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.aquabot.2016.06.006
   Slesak RA, 2014, CAN J FOREST RES, V44, P961, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0111
   Soylu ME, 2012, WATER RESOUR RES, V48, DOI 10.1029/2011WR010964
   Stan Development Team, 2022, Stan modeling language users guide and reference manual, 2.30
   Swanston CW., 2016, Forest Adaptation Resources: climate change tools and approaches for land managers, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.2737/NRS-GTR-87-2
   Valéry A, 2014, J HYDROL, V517, P1166, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.059
   Van Grinsven MJ, 2017, ECOHYDROLOGY, V10, DOI 10.1002/eco.1862
   van Vuuren DP, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P5, DOI [10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z, 10.1007/s10584-011-0157-y]
   Verdin A, 2015, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V29, P347, DOI 10.1007/s00477-014-0911-6
   Watras CJ, 2017, ECOHYDROLOGY, V10, DOI 10.1002/eco.1834
   WHITE WALTER N., 1932, U S GEOL SUN WATER SUPPLY PAPER, V659-A., P1
   Wilks DS, 2012, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V3, P267, DOI 10.1002/wcc.167
   Wilks DS, 1999, PROG PHYS GEOG, V23, P329, DOI 10.1177/030913339902300302
   Wuebbles D., 2017, Fourth National Climate Assessment
   Yuan WP, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aax1396
   Zhu JT, 2011, J HYDROL, V403, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.04.016
NR 63
TC 1
Z9 2
U1 1
U2 15
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2624-893X
J9 FRONT FOR GLOB CHANG
JI Front. For. Glob. Change
PD AUG 18
PY 2022
VL 5
AR 957526
DI 10.3389/ffgc.2022.957526
PG 22
WC Ecology; Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry
GA 4E8TZ
UT WOS:000848093900001
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Rosche, C
   Hensen, I
   Schaar, A
   Zehra, U
   Jasieniuk, M
   Callaway, RM
   Khasa, DP
   Al-Gharaibeh, MM
   Lekberg, Y
   Nagy, DU
   Pal, RW
   Okada, M
   Schrieber, K
   Turner, KG
   Lachmuth, S
   Erst, A
   Tsunoda, T
   Sheng, M
   Schmidt, R
   Peng, YL
   Luo, WB
   Jäschke, Y
   Reshi, ZA
   Shah, MA
AF Rosche, Christoph
   Hensen, Isabell
   Schaar, Adrian
   Zehra, Uzma
   Jasieniuk, Marie
   Callaway, Ragan M.
   Khasa, Damase P.
   Al-Gharaibeh, Mohammad M.
   Lekberg, Ylva
   Nagy, David U.
   Pal, Robert W.
   Okada, Miki
   Schrieber, Karin
   Turner, Kathryn G.
   Lachmuth, Susanne
   Erst, Andrey
   Tsunoda, Tomonori
   Sheng, Min
   Schmidt, Robin
   Peng, Yanling
   Luo, Wenbo
   Jaeschke, Yun
   Reshi, Zafar A.
   Shah, Manzoor A.
TI Climate outweighs native vs. nonnative range-effects for genetics and
   common garden performance of a cosmopolitan weed
SO ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS
LA English
DT Article
DE among-population variation; biological invasions; climatic gradients;
   contemporary evolution; Conyza canadensis; functional connectivity;
   multiple introductions; native vs; nonnative comparisons; non-adaptive
   evolution; post-introduction evolutionary changes; propagule pressure;
   selfing
ID HORSEWEED CONYZA-CANADENSIS; EXOTIC PLANT INVASIONS; SELF-FERTILIZATION;
   INVADED RANGE; REPRODUCTIVE ASSURANCE; COLONIZATION ABILITIES;
   POPULATION-GENETICS; DROUGHT TOLERANCE; RAPID EVOLUTION; LONG-DISTANCE
AB Comparing genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and performance between native and nonnative populations has advanced our knowledge of contemporary evolution and its ecological consequences. However, such between-range comparisons can be complicated by high among-population variation within native and nonnative ranges. For example, native vs. nonnative comparisons between small and non-representative subsets of populations for species with very large distributions have the potential to mislead because they may not sufficiently account for within-range adaptation to climatic conditions, and demographic history that may lead to non-adaptive evolution. We used the cosmopolitan weed Conyza canadensis to study the interplay of adaptive and demographic processes across, to our knowledge, the broadest climatic gradient yet investigated in this context. To examine the distribution of genetic diversity, we genotyped 26 native and 26 nonnative populations at 12 microsatellite loci. Furthermore, we recorded performance traits for 12 native and 13 nonnative populations in the field and in the common garden. To analyze how performance was related to range and/or climate, we fit pedigree mixed-effects models. These models weighed the population random effect for co-ancestry to account for the influence of demographic history on phenotypic among-population differentiation. Genetic diversity was very low, selfing rates were very high, and both were comparable between native and nonnative ranges. Nonnative populations out-performed native populations in the field. However, our most salient result was that both neutral genetic differentiation and common garden performance were far more correlated with the climatic conditions from which populations originated than native vs. nonnative range affiliation. Including co-ancestry of our populations in our models greatly increased explained variance and our ability to detect significant main effects for among-population variation in performance. High propagule pressure and high selfing rates, in concert with the ability to adapt rapidly to climatic gradients, may have facilitated the global success of this weed. Neither native nor nonnative populations were homogeneous groups but responded comparably to similar environments in each range. We suggest that studies of contemporary evolution should consider widely distributed and genotyped populations to disentangle native vs. nonnative range effects from varying adaptive processes within ranges and from potentially confounding effects of demographic history.
C1 [Rosche, Christoph; Hensen, Isabell; Schaar, Adrian; Lachmuth, Susanne] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Biol Geobot & Bot Garden, Kirchtor 1, D-06108 Halle, Saale, Germany.
   [Rosche, Christoph; Callaway, Ragan M.] Univ Montana, Div Biol Sci, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT 59812 USA.
   [Rosche, Christoph; Callaway, Ragan M.] Univ Montana, Inst Ecosyst, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT 59812 USA.
   [Rosche, Christoph; Schmidt, Robin] Independent Inst Environm Issues, Greifswalder Str 4, D-10405 Berlin, Germany.
   [Hensen, Isabell; Lachmuth, Susanne; Tsunoda, Tomonori; Schmidt, Robin] German Ctr Integrat Biodivers Res iDiv, Deutsch Pl 5e, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany.
   [Zehra, Uzma; Reshi, Zafar A.; Shah, Manzoor A.] Univ Kashmir, Dept Bot, Srinagar 190006, Jammu & Kashmir, India.
   [Jasieniuk, Marie; Okada, Miki] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
   [Khasa, Damase P.] Univ Laval, Ctr Forest Res CEF, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada.
   [Khasa, Damase P.] Univ Laval, Inst Integrat & Syst Biol IBIS, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada.
   [Al-Gharaibeh, Mohammad M.] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Agr, Dept Plant Prod, Irbid 22110, Jordan.
   [Lekberg, Ylva; Sheng, Min] MPG Ranch, 1001 South Higgins Ave,Suite A3, Missoula, MT 59801 USA.
   [Lekberg, Ylva] Univ Montana, Dept Ecosyst & Conservat Sci, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT 59812 USA.
   [Nagy, David U.] Univ Pecs, Dept Genet & Mol Biol, Ifjusag U 6, H-7624 Pecs, Hungary.
   [Pal, Robert W.] Montana Technol Univ, Dept Biol Sci, 1300 West Pk St, Butte, MT 59701 USA.
   [Schrieber, Karin] Bielefeld Univ, Dept Chem Ecol, Univ Str 25, D-33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
   [Turner, Kathryn G.] Colorado State Univ, Bioagr Sci & Pest Management Dept, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA.
   [Turner, Kathryn G.] Penn State Univ, Biol Dept, State Coll, PA 16802 USA.
   [Erst, Andrey] Russian Acad Sci, Siberian Branch, Cent Siberian Bot Garden, Zolotodolinskaya Ulitsa 101, Novosibirsk, Russia.
   [Erst, Andrey] Tomsk State Univ, Lab Phylogeny & Systemat, Lenina Prospekt,D 36, Tomsk, Russia.
   [Tsunoda, Tomonori] Shinshu Univ, Fac Agr, Minami Minowa 8304, Nagano 3994598, Japan.
   [Sheng, Min] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Forestry, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
   [Schmidt, Robin] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Community Ecol BZF, Theodor Lieser Str 4, D-06120 Halle, Germany.
   [Peng, Yanling] Shenzhen Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Agr Genom Inst, Peifei Rd 7, Shenzhen 518120, Peoples R China.
   [Luo, Wenbo] Northeast Normal Univ, Key Lab Wetland Ecol & Vegetat Restorat, Changchun 130024, Jilin, Peoples R China.
   [Jaeschke, Yun] Senckenberg Museum Nat Hist Gorlitz, POB 300154, D-02806 Gorlitz, Germany.
C3 Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg; University of Montana System;
   University of Montana; University of Montana System; University of
   Montana; University of Kashmir; University of California System;
   University of California Davis; Laval University; Laval University;
   Jordan University of Science & Technology; University of Montana System;
   University of Montana; University of Pecs; University of Montana System;
   University of Montana; University of Bielefeld; Colorado State
   University; Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education
   (PCSHE); Pennsylvania State University; Central Siberian Botanical
   Garden; Russian Academy of Sciences; Tomsk State University; Shinshu
   University; Northwest A&F University - China; Helmholtz Association;
   Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research (UFZ); Chinese Academy of
   Agricultural Sciences; Agriculture Genomes Institute at Shenzhen, CAAS;
   Northeast Normal University - China; Leibniz Association; Senckenberg
   Gesellschaft fur Naturforschung (SGN)
RP Rosche, C (corresponding author), Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Biol Geobot & Bot Garden, Kirchtor 1, D-06108 Halle, Saale, Germany.; Rosche, C (corresponding author), Univ Montana, Div Biol Sci, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT 59812 USA.; Rosche, C (corresponding author), Univ Montana, Inst Ecosyst, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT 59812 USA.; Rosche, C (corresponding author), Independent Inst Environm Issues, Greifswalder Str 4, D-10405 Berlin, Germany.
EM christoph.rosche@botanik.uni-halle.de
RI Erst, Andrey/M-3444-2016; Lachmuth, Susanne/H-8066-2019; RESHI,
   ZAFAR/AAQ-7373-2021; Tsunoda, Tomonori/AAH-8628-2020; Nagy, David
   U/N-8697-2019; Schrieber, Karin/ABD-1544-2021; Turner,
   Kathryn/M-2074-2014; Wang, Yun/G-4825-2015
OI Rosche, Christoph/0000-0002-4257-3072; Pal, Robert/0000-0003-2843-8517;
   Schrieber, Karin/0000-0001-7181-2741; Schmidt,
   Robin/0000-0001-5445-0216; Turner, Kathryn/0000-0001-8982-0301; Reshi,
   Zafar A/0000-0001-9567-7484; Al-Gharaibeh, Mohammad/0000-0001-9242-4262;
   Khasa, Damase/0000-0002-9336-7770; Lachmuth,
   Susanne/0000-0002-4027-7632; Wang, Yun/0000-0002-8238-5367; Nagy,
   David/0000-0001-7742-4459; Lekberg, Ylva/0000-0003-1033-8032
FU DAAD postdoctoral fellowship [91554701]; DAAD-DST exchange program grant
   [57085939]; NSF PRFB [1523842]; NSF EPSCoR Cooperative Agreement
   [IIA-1757351]; National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0504400]; NSERC
   [CG073540]; Div Of Biological Infrastructure; Direct For Biological
   Sciences [1523842] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
FX The authors thank V. Burghard and C. Voigt for their assistance during
   the germination experiment and D. Hooper, I. J. K. Link, M. L. Slate, as
   well as V. and L. Pavlu during the greenhouse experiment. We are
   grateful to B. Muller and W. Grotherath for their invaluable efforts in
   the population genetic lab. We thank M. Roshan, M. E. Beaulieu, N.
   Fontaine, S. Trogisch, T. Spribille, C. Plos, C. Stein, P. Mraz, S.
   Trager, S. Heinecke, J. Nyulasi, M. Kohler, A. Khan, L. Zhang, J. Yan,
   and X. Li for collecting plant material and/or field data. This work was
   supported by a DAAD postdoctoral fellowship (91554701 to C. Rosche), a
   DAAD-DST exchange program grant (57085939 to C. Rosche, I. Hensen, U.
   Zehra, Z. A. Reshi. and M. A. Shah), a NSF PRFB grant (1523842 to K. G.
   Turner), a NSF EPSCoR Cooperative Agreement (IIA-1757351 to R. M.
   Callaway), a grant of the National Key R&D Program of China
   (2017YFC0504400 to M. Sheng) and an NSERC grant (CG073540 to D. P.
   Khasa). We thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on
   previous versions of the manuscript and I. Kuhn for suggestions on
   spatial autocorrelation.
CR Abhilasha D, 2009, J PLANT ECOL, V2, P77, DOI 10.1093/jpe/rtp008
   Agrawal AA, 2015, AM NAT, V186, pE1, DOI 10.1086/681622
   [Anonymous], R package version 2.6-7
   Austerlitz F, 2000, GENETICS, V154, P1309
   Bajwa AA, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V23, P24694, DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-7794-7
   Barker BS, 2017, MOL ECOL, V26, P1131, DOI 10.1111/mec.13998
   Bates D, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V67, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Blackburn TM, 2011, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V26, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023
   Broennimann O, 2014, J BIOGEOGR, V41, P1126, DOI 10.1111/jbi.12274
   Callaway RM, 2006, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V21, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2006.04.008
   Callaway RM, 2011, ECOLOGY, V92, P2208, DOI 10.1890/11-0518.1
   Callaway RM, 2004, NATURE, V427, P731, DOI 10.1038/nature02322
   Cheptou PO, 2002, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V269, P1177, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2002.1997
   Chybicki IJ, 2009, J HERED, V100, P106, DOI 10.1093/jhered/esn088
   Colautti RI, 2015, MOL ECOL, V24, P1999, DOI 10.1111/mec.13162
   Colautti RI, 2013, SCIENCE, V342, P364, DOI 10.1126/science.1242121
   Dauer JT, 2007, J APPL ECOL, V44, P105, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01256.x
   Davis KT, 2019, ECOGRAPHY, V42, P1, DOI 10.1111/ecog.03836
   Dlugosch KM, 2008, MOL ECOL, V17, P431, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03538.x
   Dlugosch KM, 2015, MOL ECOL, V24, P2095, DOI 10.1111/mec.13183
   Dornier A, 2008, EVOLUTION, V62, P2558, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00464.x
   Doyle J., 1990, Focus, V12, P13
   Dumolin S, 1995, THEOR APPL GENET, V91, P1253, DOI 10.1007/BF00220937
   Evanno G, 2005, MOL ECOL, V14, P2611, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
   Excoffier L, 2010, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V10, P564, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x
   Gao H, 2007, GENETICS, V176, P1635, DOI 10.1534/genetics.107.072371
   Guo WY, 2018, ECOL EVOL, V8, P2440, DOI 10.1002/ece3.3869
   Hardy OJ, 2002, MOL ECOL NOTES, V2, P618, DOI 10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00305.x
   Hayashi I., 1979, Bulletin Yokohama Phytosociological, V16, P407
   Heinicke S, 2016, FLORA, V224, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.flora.2016.06.003
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   Hughes AR, 2008, ECOL LETT, V11, P609, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01179.x
   Jakobsson M, 2007, BIOINFORMATICS, V23, P1801, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233
   Janes JK, 2017, MOL ECOL, V26, P3594, DOI 10.1111/mec.14187
   KARHUNEN M, 2013, RAFM ADMIXTURE F MOD
   Karhunen M, 2012, GENETICS, V192, P609, DOI 10.1534/genetics.112.140871
   Keane RM, 2002, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V17, P164, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02499-0
   Keller SR, 2010, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V23, P1720, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02037.x
   Keller SR, 2008, ECOL LETT, V11, P852, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01188.x
   Keller SR, 2009, NEW PHYTOL, V183, P678, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02892.x
   Lachmuth S, 2011, NEW PHYTOL, V192, P529, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03808.x
   Lachmuth S, 2010, MOL ECOL, V19, P3952, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04797.x
   Ledger KJ, 2015, PLANT ECOL, V216, P1285, DOI 10.1007/s11258-015-0508-2
   Lekberg Y, 2018, ECOL LETT, V21, P1268, DOI 10.1111/ele.13093
   Liu J, 2018, ECOSCIENCE, V25, P271, DOI 10.1080/11956860.2018.1455371
   Macdonald SL, 2018, ECOL LETT, V21, P207, DOI 10.1111/ele.12883
   Manel S, 2013, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V28, P614, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.012
   Maron JL, 2004, ECOL MONOGR, V74, P261, DOI 10.1890/03-4027
   Maron JL, 2014, J ECOL, V102, P19, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12172
   Matesanz S, 2013, ECOLOGY, V94, P2464, DOI 10.1890/12-1359.1
   Middleton BA, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0208300
   Mitchell CE, 2006, ECOL LETT, V9, P726, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00908.x
   Mráz P, 2014, ANN BOT-LONDON, V114, P289, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcu105
   Okada M, 2013, EVOL APPL, V6, P761, DOI 10.1111/eva.12061
   Oksanen J, 2022, R package version 2.6-2, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412971874.N145
   Pál R, 2004, WEED TECHNOL, V18, P1314, DOI 10.1614/0890-037X(2004)018[1314:IPTSWV]2.0.CO;2
   Pal RW, 2015, BIOL INVASIONS, V17, P3317, DOI 10.1007/s10530-015-0955-7
   PAL RW, 2012, INVAZIOS NOVENYFAJOK, P213
   Pannell JR, 2015, MOL ECOL, V24, P2018, DOI 10.1111/mec.13087
   Pannell JR, 1998, EVOLUTION, V52, P657, DOI [10.2307/2411261, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb03691.x]
   Parker JD, 2013, ECOLOGY, V94, P985, DOI 10.1890/12-1810.1
   Peischl S, 2015, AM NAT, V185, pE81, DOI 10.1086/680220
   Peng YH, 2014, PLANT PHYSIOL, V166, P1241, DOI 10.1104/pp.114.247668
   Pérez-Fernández MA, 2006, J ENVIRON BIOL, V27, P13
   R Core Team, 2019, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
   Rellstab C, 2015, MOL ECOL, V24, P4348, DOI 10.1111/mec.13322
   Reusch TBH, 2014, EVOL APPL, V7, P104, DOI 10.1111/eva.12109
   Rius M, 2014, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V29, P233, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2014.02.003
   Rosche C, 2018, PLANT BIOLOGY, V20, P75, DOI 10.1111/plb.12628
   Rosche C, 2018, BASIC APPL ECOL, V28, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2018.02.001
   Rosche C, 2017, J ECOL, V105, P425, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12670
   Rosche C, 2016, BIOL INVASIONS, V18, P1895, DOI 10.1007/s10530-016-1133-2
   Rosenberg NA, 2004, MOL ECOL NOTES, V4, P137, DOI 10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00566.x
   Schrieber K, 2017, OIKOS, V126, P572, DOI 10.1111/oik.03781
   Schrieber K, 2017, BIOL REV, V92, P939, DOI 10.1111/brv.12263
   Shah MA, 2014, NEW PHYTOL, V202, P1286, DOI 10.1111/nph.12733
   Shields EJ, 2006, WEED SCI, V54, P1063, DOI 10.1614/WS-06-097R1.1
   Slatkin M, 2012, GENETICS, V191, P171, DOI 10.1534/genetics.112.139022
   STEBBINS GL, 1957, AM NAT, V91, P337, DOI 10.1086/281999
   Stein K, 2014, J TROP ECOL, V30, P199, DOI 10.1017/S0266467414000030
   Stewart CN Jr, 2009, WEED SCI, V57, P451, DOI 10.1614/WS-09-011.1
   Tardieu F, 2018, ANNU REV PLANT BIOL, V69, P733, DOI 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040218
   Turner KG, 2015, ECOL EVOL, V5, P3183, DOI 10.1002/ece3.1599
   Uller T, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P3478, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02509.x
   VanGessel MJ, 2001, WEED SCI, V49, P703, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0703:RPRHFD]2.0.CO;2
   Verhoeven KJF, 2011, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V278, P2, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.1272
   Vilà M, 2011, ECOL LETT, V14, P702, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x
   Voillemot M, 2017, ECOL EVOL, V7, P8535, DOI 10.1002/ece3.3354
   Vu VQ., 2011, ggbiplot: A ggplot2 based biplot. R package version 0.55
   Wang CY, 2017, POL J ENVIRON STUD, V26, P1289, DOI 10.15244/pjoes/66175
   Wang IJ, 2014, MOL ECOL, V23, P5649, DOI 10.1111/mec.12938
   Weaver SE, 2001, CAN J PLANT SCI, V81, P867, DOI 10.4141/P00-196
   Weber E, 2008, BIOL INVASIONS, V10, P1411, DOI 10.1007/s10530-008-9216-3
   Welles S.R., 2019, POPULATION GENOMICS, P655, DOI [10.1007/13836_2018_22, DOI 10.1007/13836_2018_22, 10.1007/13836201822]
   Wilson JRU, 2009, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V24, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.007
   Wright S, 1943, GENETICS, V28, P114
   Yuan JS, 2010, WEED SCI, V58, P109, DOI 10.1614/WS-D-09-00037.1
   Zenni RD, 2014, ECOL LETT, V17, P727, DOI 10.1111/ele.12278
NR 98
TC 30
Z9 30
U1 2
U2 66
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0012-9615
EI 1557-7015
J9 ECOL MONOGR
JI Ecol. Monogr.
PD NOV
PY 2019
VL 89
IS 4
AR e01386
DI 10.1002/ecm.1386
EA JUL 2019
PG 20
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA JK4ZT
UT WOS:000477494600001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, DL
   Xi, YZ
   Boffa, DJ
   Liu, Y
   Nogueira, LM
AF Zhang, Danlu
   Xi, Yuzhi
   Boffa, Daniel J.
   Liu, Yang
   Nogueira, Leticia M.
TI Association of Wildfire Exposure While Recovering From Lung Cancer
   Surgery With Overall Survival
SO JAMA ONCOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
ID WILDLAND FIRE SMOKE; ANTHROPOGENIC CLIMATE-CHANGE; WESTERN
   UNITED-STATES; HEALTH IMPACTS; AIR-POLLUTION; EMISSIONS
AB IMPORTANCE With a changing climate, wildfire activity in the US has increased dramatically, presenting multifaceted and compounding health hazards. Individuals discharged from the hospital following surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are potentially at higher risk from wildfires' health hazards.
   OBJECTIVE To assess the association between wildfire exposure and postoperative long-term overall survival among patients with lung cancer in the US.
   DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this cohort study, individuals who underwent curative-intent NSCLC resection between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2019, were selected from the National Cancer Database. Daily wildfire information was aggregated at the zip code level from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Fire Information for Resource Management System. The data analysis was performed between July 19, 2022, and April 14, 2023.
   EXPOSURE An active wildfire detected at the zip code of residence between 0 and 3, 4 and 6, or 7 and 12 months after NSCLC surgery.
   MAIN OUTCOME Overall survival was defined as the interval between age at hospital discharge and age at death, last contact, or study end, whichever came first. Cox proportional hazards were used for estimating hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for sex, region, metropolitan category, health insurance type, comorbidities, tumor size, lymph node involvement, era, and facility type.
   RESULTS A total of 466 912 individuals included in the study (249 303 female and [53.4] and 217 609 male [46.6%]; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 67.3 [9.9] years), with 48 582 (10.4%) first exposed to a wildfire between 0 and 3 months, 48 328 (10.6%) between 4 and 6 months, and 71 735 (15.3%) between 7 and 12 months following NSCLC surgery. Individuals exposed to a wildfire within 3 months (adjusted HR [AHR], 1.43; 95% CI, 1.41-1.45), between 4 and 6 months (AHR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.37-1.41), and between 7 and 12 months (AHR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.15-1.19) after discharge from the hospital following stage I to III NSCLC resection had worse overall survival than unexposed individuals.
   CONCLUSIONS In this cohort study, wildfire exposure was associated with worse overall survival following NSCLC surgical resection, suggesting that patients with lung cancer are at greater risk from the health hazards of wildfires and need to be prioritized in climate adaptation efforts.
C1 [Zhang, Danlu; Xi, Yuzhi; Liu, Yang] Emory Univ, Dept Environm Hlth, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA.
   [Boffa, Daniel J.] Yale Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA.
   [Nogueira, Leticia M.] Amer Canc Soc, Surveillance & Hlth Equity Sci, 3380 Chastain Meadows Pkwy NW,S 200, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA.
C3 Emory University; Rollins School Public Health; Yale University;
   American Cancer Society
RP Nogueira, LM (corresponding author), Amer Canc Soc, Surveillance & Hlth Equity Sci, 3380 Chastain Meadows Pkwy NW,S 200, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA.
EM leticia.nogueira@cancer.org
RI Xi, Yuzhi/ABC-3760-2021
FU National Aeronautics and Space Administration [80NSSC21K0507]
FX This project was supported by grant 80NSSC21K0507 from the National
   Aeronautics and Space Administration.
CR Abatzoglou JT, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P11770, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1607171113
   Alman BL, 2016, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12940-016-0146-8
   Balbus JM, 2009, J OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V51, P33, DOI 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318193e12e
   Balch JK, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P2946, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1617394114
   Balduyck B, 2009, EUR J CARDIO-THORAC, V35, P1070, DOI 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.01.050
   Balmes JR, 2018, NEW ENGL J MED, V378, P881, DOI 10.1056/NEJMp1716846
   Black C, 2017, ENVIRON TOXICOL PHAR, V55, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.etap.2017.08.022
   Boffa DJ, 2008, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V135, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.07.060
   Brady MA., 2006, INT WORKSH AGR RISK
   Cascio WE, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V624, P586, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.086
   Csiszar IA, 2006, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V44, P1757, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2006.875941
   Davies D., 2019, EARSEL FOR FIR SIG W
   Dennison PE, 2014, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V41, P2928, DOI 10.1002/2014GL059576
   Eckel SP, 2016, THORAX, V71, P891, DOI 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207927
   Emilsson L, 2018, JAMA ONCOL, V4, P63, DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.2752
   Fajersztajn L, 2013, NAT REV CANCER, V13, P674, DOI 10.1038/nrc3572
   Fernandez FG, 2018, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V155, P1254, DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.09.149
   Giglio L., 2015, MODIS COLLECTION 6 A, P9
   Handy JR, 2002, CHEST, V122, P21, DOI 10.1378/chest.122.1.21
   Hohner AK, 2019, ACCOUNTS CHEM RES, V52, P1234, DOI 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00670
   Jemal A, 2007, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V57, P43, DOI 10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43
   Justice CO, 2002, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V83, P3, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00084-6
   Kim KH, 2015, ENVIRON INT, V74, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.005
   Kizer KW, 2020, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V324, P1605, DOI 10.1001/jama.2020.19334
   Klabunde CN, 2000, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V53, P1258, DOI 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00256-0
   Korn EL, 1997, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V145, P72
   Korsiak J, 2022, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V6, pE400, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00067-5
   Larsen A, 2021, J EXPO SCI ENV EPID, V31, P170, DOI 10.1038/s41370-020-0246-y
   Lindenmayer DB, 2018, SCIENCE, V361, P341, DOI 10.1126/science.aau6672
   Littell JS, 2009, ECOL APPL, V19, P1003, DOI 10.1890/07-1183.1
   Liu JC, 2015, ENVIRON RES, V136, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.015
   Liu JC, 2017, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V186, P730, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwx141
   Mallin K, 2019, ANN SURG ONCOL, V26, P1604, DOI 10.1245/s10434-019-07213-1
   MORISETTE JT, 2005, EARTH INTERACT, V9, P1, DOI DOI 10.1175/EI141.1
   National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine, 2020, IMPL CAL WILDF HLTH
   National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Colon Cancer Version 1
   Nogueira LM, 2020, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V70, P239, DOI 10.3322/caac.21610
   Pavlovic R, 2016, J AIR WASTE MANAGE, V66, P819, DOI 10.1080/10962247.2016.1158214
   Proctor CR, 2020, AWWA WATER SCI, V2, DOI 10.1002/aws2.1183
   Radeloff VC, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P3314, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1718850115
   Rappold AG, 2017, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V51, P6674, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b06200
   Reid CE, 2016, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V124, P1334, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1409277
   Schlosser JS, 2017, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V122, P8951, DOI 10.1002/2017JD026547
   Schoennagel T, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P4582, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1617464114
   Schweizer D, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V201, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.004
   Strader SM, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V92, P543, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3217-z
   Syphard AD, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P1388, DOI 10.1890/06-1128.1
   To P, 2021, BEHAV SCI-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/bs11090126
   Vaidyanathan A, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V619, P376, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.270
   Westerling AL, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P940, DOI 10.1126/science.1128834
   Westerling AL, 2016, PHILOS T R SOC B, V371, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2015.0178
   Williams AP, 2019, EARTHS FUTURE, V7, P892, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001210
   Williams AP, 2016, CURR CLIM CHANGE REP, V2, P1, DOI 10.1007/s40641-016-0031-0
   Xu RB, 2020, NEW ENGL J MED, V383, P2173, DOI 10.1056/NEJMsr2028985
   Youssouf H, 2014, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V11, P11772, DOI 10.3390/ijerph111111772
   Yu P., 2022, PLoS Med, V19, DOI [10.1371/journal.pmed.1004103, DOI 10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1004103]
NR 56
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 1
U2 12
PU AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
PI CHICAGO
PA 330 N WABASH AVE, STE 39300, CHICAGO, IL 60611-5885 USA
SN 2374-2437
EI 2374-2445
J9 JAMA ONCOL
JI JAMA Oncol.
PD JUL 27
PY 2023
VL 9
IS 9
BP 1214
EP 1220
DI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.2144
EA JUL 2023
PG 7
WC Oncology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Oncology
GA HV2K1
UT WOS:001039226300002
PM 37498574
OA Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Girma, G
   Melka, Y
   Haileslassie, A
   Mekuria, W
AF Girma, Gonche
   Melka, Yoseph
   Haileslassie, Amare
   Mekuria, Wolde
TI Participatory forest management for improving livelihood assets and
   mitigating forest degradation: Lesson drawn from the Central Rift
SO CURRENT RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate adaptation; Environmental degradation; Institutional structures;
   Livelihood assets; Sustainable Forest development
ID BALE HIGHLANDS; CHALLENGES; COMMUNITY; CONSERVATION; RESOURCES; IMPACTS;
   SAVINGS
AB The study was conducted in Heban Arsi district, Central Rift Valley, Ethiopia to investigate the contribution of participatory forest management (PFM) to improving household's livelihood assets and mitigating forest degradation. Data were gathered using household surveys, observation, key informant interviews and focus group discussions. During the entire study, 231 households (131 from PFM; 100 form non-PFM households), 35 key informants (25 from PFM; 10 from non-PFM) and 10 focus groups (6 from PFM; 4 from non-PFM) were involved. The livelihood assets framework was used to organize and analyze the quantitative data. The qualitative data was analyzed using topic coding and building categories, themes, and patterns of relationships. The introduction of PFM significantly (P < 0.05) improved the overall natural (index value of 0.72 and 0.58 for PFM and non-PFM, respectively), financial (0.73 and 0.61), physical (0.49 and 0.37), human (0.62 and 0.57) and social (0.77 and 0.59) livelihood asset values of local communities and contributed to the mitigation of forest degradation. On average, households involved in PFM displayed a 61.6%, 45.7%, 30.8% and 24.2% improvements in natural, financial, physical, and social assets, respectively. Households engaged in PFM showed a 37.4% improvement on the overall livelihood assets value, suggesting that PFM households displayed better livelihood assets compared to non-PFM households. However, the overall contribution of PFM to the livelihood assets showed skewed structure, suggesting that the improvements deviate from sustainability. The existing institutional structure including bylaws contributed a lot to strengthen PFM. Yet, it is crucial to strengthening the protection of forestlands through improving rule enforcement and commitments of both formal and informal institutions in managing forest resources. Also, sustaining the extraction of wood and non-wood forest products and the benefits from as well as integration of other interventions in PFM areas such as the provision of improved cook stoves and solar PV could help reduce forest degradation, improve the sense of ownership among local communities and sustain PFM activities. Further, expanding capacity building trainings and improving access to market could play a great role to sustainably manage forest resources through increasing the participation of local communities in decision making processes.
C1 [Girma, Gonche] Ethiopian Environm & Forest Res Inst, POB 24536, Addis Ababa 1000, Ethiopia.
   [Girma, Gonche; Melka, Yoseph] Hawassa Univ, Wondo Genet Coll Forestry & Nat Resources, POB 128, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
   [Haileslassie, Amare; Mekuria, Wolde] East African & Nile Basin Reg Off, Int Water Management Inst IWMI, POB 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
C3 Hawassa University; CGIAR; International Water Management Institute
   (IWMI)
RP Mekuria, W (corresponding author), East African & Nile Basin Reg Off, Int Water Management Inst IWMI, POB 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
EM a.haileslassie@cgiar.org; w.bori@cgiar.org
OI Yoseph, Melka/0000-0002-5659-5889
FU Swedish International Development Agency (SIDA)
FX We thank the Swedish International Development Agency (SIDA) for
   providing financial support to Nature for Future project implemented in
   Central Rift Valley, Ethiopia. We also thank Woreda government offices,
   local administrative bodies, private sectors, project offices and local
   communities for their support during project implementation.
CR Abebaw D, 2012, FOREST POLICY ECON, V20, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.02.002
   Ameha A, 2014, ENVIRON MANAGE, V53, P838, DOI 10.1007/s00267-014-0243-9
   Amena E.M., 2017, J BIODIVERS MANAG, V6
   Arnold JEM, 2001, ECOL ECON, V39, P437, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00236-1
   Ayana AN, 2017, CRIT POLICY STUD, V11, P19, DOI 10.1080/19460171.2015.1024703
   Baiyegunhi LJS, 2016, J FORESTRY RES, V27, P443, DOI 10.1007/s11676-015-0168-z
   Begum F, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V298, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113504
   Berkes F, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V90, P1692, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001
   Birendra K. C., 2014, Environment and Natural Resources Research, V4, P142
   Birhan Endalkachew, 2021, [Geography, Environment, Sustainability, Geography, Environment, Sustainability], V14, P185, DOI 10.24057/2071-9388-2020-108
   Central Statistical Agency (CSA), 2007, FED DEM REP ETH
   Chambers R., 1992, Discussion Paper - Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex
   Chen HY, 2013, LAND USE POLICY, V30, P908, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.009
   Chinangwa L., 2016, INT J FORESTRY RES, V12, DOI [DOI 10.1155/2016/5847068, 10.1155/2016/5847068]
   Dawson IK, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V333, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.021
   DFID, 1999, Sustainable livelihood guidance sheets
   Difabachew Endale, 2022, Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics, V25, P13, DOI 10.15414/raae.2022.25.01.13-29
   Dresen E, 2014, LAND-BASEL, V3, P1137, DOI 10.3390/land3031137
   FAO, 2022, The state of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. Towards Blue Transformation, DOI [10.4060/ca9229en, 10.4060/cc0461en, DOI 10.4060/CC0461EN, DOI 10.4060/CA9229EN]
   FAO (FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION), 2014, STAT WORLDS FOR ENH
   FARM-Africa, 2020, COMM BAS FOR MAN REP
   Fekadu M., 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE, V7, P1
   Gebreegziabher Z, 2018, RESOUR ENERGY ECON, V52, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2018.01.006
   Gobeze T, 2009, INT FOREST REV, V11, P346, DOI 10.1505/ifor.11.3.346
   HADADO (Heban Arsi District Agriculture Development Office), 2020, HEB ARS DISR AGR DEV
   Hong H.N., 2005, SEARCH EXCELLENCE EX, V2, P49
   Islam K.K., 2016, INT J NAT RESOUR ECO, V1, P88, DOI 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20160103.14
   Islam K.K., 2014, Open J. For., V04, P1, DOI [10.4236/ojf.2014.45b001, DOI 10.4236/OJF.2014.45B001]
   Islam K, 2019, ENVIRON DEV, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2019.100456
   Kassa G., 2015, SINET Ethiop J Sci, V38, P1
   Kassa H., 2017, INT FOREST REV, V19, P51, DOI [10.1505/146554817822330560, DOI 10.1505/146554817822330560]
   Kassa H, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V90, P1004, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.03.009
   Kedir H, 2018, J SUSTAIN FOREST, V37, P357, DOI [10.1080/10549811.2017.1414614, 10.1080/10549811.2017.]
   Kibria AMG, 2014, J FOREST RES-JPN, V19, P42, DOI 10.1007/s10310-013-0403-4
   Kumar M, 2016, INDIAN J DAIRY SCI, V69, P220
   Kumar P., 1999, Journal of Service Marketing, V2, P4, DOI [DOI 10.1177/109467059921002, 10.1177/109467059921002]
   Lemeneh M., 2004, EFFECTS LAND USE CHA, V306, P18
   Lemeneh M., 2015, FARM AFRICA TECHNICA
   Lemenih M, 2014, FORESTS, V5, P1896, DOI 10.3390/f5081896
   Levine S, 2014, How to study livelihoods: bringing a sustainable livelihoods framework to life, P1
   Luswaga H, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12030921
   Matiku P, 2013, CONSERV SOC, V11, P112, DOI 10.4103/0972-4923.115724
   MEFCC, 2018, SITUATION ANAL, V1
   Mekuria W, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10121373
   Mengist D., 2019, African Journal of Agricultural Research, V14, P2119
   Natarajan N, 2022, WORLD DEV, V155, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105898
   Nath TK, 2010, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V23, P1093, DOI 10.1080/08941920802653521
   Nath TK, 2009, PARTICIPATORY FOREST MANAGEMENT AND LIVELIHOOD OF ETHNIC PEOPLE: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS FROM BANGLADESH, P1
   Nelson F., 2010, Community rights, conservation and contested land: The politics of natural resource governance in Africa, P3
   Ngowo G.M., 2014, THESIS SOKOINE
   Okumu B., 2017, Economic analysis of participatory forest management in Kenya
   Potters J., 2003, Second international workshop on participatory forestry in Africa: Defining the way forward: Sustainable livelihoods and sustainable forest management through participatory forestry, P69
   Reddy V.R., 2004, DEV EC WORKING PAPER, V22158
   Sabogal C., 2013, 173 FAO UN CTR INT F
   Scoones I., 2016, Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, V5, P221, DOI 10.1177/2277976016683750
   Senganimalunje TC, 2020, J SUSTAIN FOREST, DOI 10.1080/10549811.2020.1745654
   Senganimalunje TC, 2016, AGROFOREST SYST, V90, P691, DOI 10.1007/s10457-015-9826-6
   Serrat O., 2017, Knowledge Solutions, P21, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0983-95, 10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9]
   Shahbaz B., 2009, Dilemmas in Participatory Forest Management in Northwest Pakistan - A Livelihood Perspective
   Soe KT, 2019, FORESTS, V10, DOI 10.3390/f10050427
   Soe KT, 2019, FOREST POLICY ECON, V100, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.11.009
   Solomon Tadesse Solomon Tadesse, 2017, Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, V26, P229, DOI 10.1080/14728028.2017.1322920
   Suleiman MS, 2017, ECOL PROCESS, V6, DOI 10.1186/s13717-017-0090-8
   Tadesse SA, 2017, ECOL PROCESS, V6, DOI 10.1186/s13717-017-0084-6
   Tesfaye Y., 2015, ENHANCING ROLE FORES
   Tesfaye Y, 2011, FOREST POLICY ECON, V13, P258, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.01.002
   The Global Forest Goals Report, 2021, GLOBAL FOREST GOALS
   UNEP, 2016, CONTR FOR NAT INC ET
   Walle Y, 2020, J SUSTAIN FOREST, V39, P655, DOI 10.1080/10549811.2019.1684950
   Yami M, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14031478
   Yemiru T, 2010, INT FOREST REV, V12, P66, DOI 10.1505/ifor.12.1.66
NR 71
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 1
U2 2
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2666-0490
J9 CURR RES ENVIRON SUS
JI Curr. Res. Environmental Sustainability
PY 2023
VL 5
AR 100205
DI 10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100205
EA DEC 2022
PG 11
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 7X2YS
UT WOS:000914069400001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU de Guzman, EB
   Escobedo, FJ
   O'Leary, R
AF de Guzman, Edith B.
   Escobedo, Francisco J.
   O'Leary, Rachel
TI A socio-ecological approach to align tree stewardship programs with
   public health benefits in marginalized neighborhoods in Los Angeles, USA
SO FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE urban forest management; urban forest equity; community engagement; tree
   planting; community-based climate adaptation; collaborative ecosystem
   management
ID ESTABLISHMENT SUCCESS; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; URBAN FOREST; GREEN SPACE;
   HEAT; STREET; COMMUNITY; CALIFORNIA; EMISSIONS; SURVIVAL
AB Extreme heat in the United States is a leading cause of weather-related deaths, disproportionately affecting low-income communities of color who tend to live in substandard housing with limited indoor cooling and fewer trees. Trees in cities have been documented to improve public health in many ways and provide climate regulating ecosystem services via shading, absorbing, and transpiring heat, measurably reducing heat-related illnesses and deaths. Advancing "urban forest equity" by planting trees in marginalized neighborhoods is acknowledged as a climate health equity strategy. But information is lacking about the efficacy of tree planting programs in advancing urban forest equity and public wellbeing. There is a need for frameworks to address the mismatch between policy goals, governance, resources, and community desires on how to green marginalized neighborhoods for public health improvement-especially in water-scarce environments. Prior studies have used environmental management-based approaches to evaluate planting programs, but few have focused on equity and health outcomes. We adapted a theory-based, multi-dimensional socio-ecological systems (SES) framework regularly used in the public health field to evaluate the Tree Ambassador, or Promotor Forestal, program in Los Angeles, US. The program is modeled after the community health worker model-where frontline health workers are trusted community members. It aims to address urban forest equity and wellbeing by training, supporting, and compensating residents to organize their communities. We use focus groups, surveys, and ethnographic methods to develop our SES model of community-based tree stewardship. The model elucidates how interacting dimensions-from individual to society level-drive urban forest equity and related public health outcomes. We then present an alternative framework, adding temporal and spatial factors to these dimensions. Evaluation results and our SES model highlight drivers aiding or hindering program trainees in organizing communities, including access to properties, perceptions about irrigation responsibilities, and lack of trust in local government. We also find that as trainee experience increases, measures including self- and collective efficacy and trust in their neighbors increase. Findings can inform urban forestry policy, planning, and management actions at the government and non-profit levels that aim to increase tree cover and reduce heat exposure in marginalized communities.
C1 [de Guzman, Edith B.] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA.
   [Escobedo, Francisco J.] US Dept Agr USDA Forest Serv, Pacific Southwest Res Stn, Riverside, CA USA.
   [O'Leary, Rachel] City Plants, Los Angeles, CA USA.
C3 University of California System; University of California Los Angeles
RP de Guzman, EB (corresponding author), Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA.
EM eb3@ucla.edu
RI Escobedo, Francisco/H-1286-2016
OI DE GUZMAN, EDITH/0000-0002-6715-3963
FU U.S. Forest Service, Region 5's Urban and Community Forestry Program;
   Los Angeles Center for Urban Natural Resources Sustainability; UC Center
   for Climate, Health and Equity
FX This project was made possible with support from U.S. Forest Service,
   Region 5's Urban and Community Forestry Program, the Los Angeles Center
   for Urban Natural Resources Sustainability, and the UC Center for
   Climate, Health and Equity.
CR Akbari H, 2002, ENVIRON POLLUT, V116, pS119, DOI 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00264-0
   [Anonymous], 2019, LAS GREEN NEW DEAL S
   [Anonymous], 2019, LOS ANGELES DAILY NE
   [Anonymous], 2021, Community Health Workers
   Barreca A, 2016, J POLIT ECON, V124, P105, DOI 10.1086/684582
   Bekesi D., 2019, ADAPTING EXPAND CONT, V42, P41
   Boone Christopher G., 2010, Urban Ecosystems, V13, P255, DOI 10.1007/s11252-009-0118-7
   CAPA Strategies for Los Angeles Urban Forest Equity Collective, 2021, LA URB FOR EQ STREET
   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019, SOC EC MOD FRAM PREV
   Centers for Disease Control Prevention, 2019, PROM SAL COMM HLTH W
   Chakraborty T, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab3b99
   Checker M, 2011, CITY SOC, V23, P210, DOI 10.1111/j.1548-744X.2011.01063.x
   City of Los Angeles, 2022, CIT COUNC
   City of Los Angeles Bureau of Street Services, 2015, 2015 STAT STREET TRE
   Danford R., 2014, Cities and The Environment (CATE), V7, P2
   Danis K.., 2007, NEW YORK DAILY  1010
   Dawes LC, 2018, URBAN ECOSYST, V21, P657, DOI 10.1007/s11252-018-0760-z
   de Guzman Edith, 2018, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, V44, P291
   Donovan GH, 2021, FOREST POLICY ECON, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102387
   Dousset B, 2011, INT J CLIMATOL, V31, P313, DOI 10.1002/joc.2222
   Dudek for City Plants, 2018, 1 STEP DEV URB FOR M
   Escobedo FJ, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V37, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.011
   Esperon-Rodriguez M, 2022, PLANTS PEOPLE PLANET, V4, P201, DOI 10.1002/ppp3.10240
   Estrada Francisco, 2017, Nature Climate Change, V7, P403, DOI 10.1038/nclimate3301
   Gifford R., 2012, The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology, P65, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199733026.013.0004
   Golden SD, 2012, HEALTH EDUC BEHAV, V39, P364, DOI 10.1177/1090198111418634
   Hall A., 2018, PUBLICATION NUMBER
   Hartig T, 2006, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V26, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.07.007
   Hoffman JS, 2020, CLIMATE, V8, DOI 10.3390/cli8010012
   Jack-Scott Emily, 2013, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, V39, P189
   Jesdale BM, 2013, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V121, P811, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1205919
   Kalkstein L.., 2014, The impact of oppressive weather on mortality across demographic groups in los angeles county and the potential impact of climate change
   Kalkstein LS, 2022, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V66, P911, DOI 10.1007/s00484-022-02248-8
   Keith Meerow., 2020, J EXTREME EVENTS, DOI DOI 10.1142/S2345737620500037
   Kendall A, 2012, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V17, P444, DOI 10.1007/s11367-011-0339-x
   Ko YK, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V143, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.07.017
   Krasny M.E., 2015, Civic ecology: Adaptation and transformation from the ground up
   Kuo FE, 1998, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V26, P823, DOI 10.1023/A:1022294028903
   Landry SM, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN A, V41, P2651, DOI 10.1068/a41236
   Lavrakas P. J., 2008, British Medical Journal, DOI [DOI 10.1136/BMJ.F6304, 10.1136/bmj.f6304, DOI 10.4135/9781412963947]
   Lee SJ, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V24, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.03.004
   Levinsson A, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V28, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.09.014
   Li DW, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab7d04
   Lipkis A.., 1984, ARBORICULTURAL J, V8, P211, DOI [10.1080/03071375.1984.9746678, DOI 10.1080/03071375.1984.9746678]
   Livesley SJ, 2016, J ENVIRON QUAL, V45, P119, DOI 10.2134/jeq2015.11.0567
   Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, 2021, NEAR REAL TIM PREC M
   McPherson E. G., 2007, LOS ANGELES ONE MILL
   McPherson EG, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V99, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.011
   Mohin M., 2020, PREPRINT, DOI [10.35542/osf.io/z628v, DOI 10.35542/OSF.IO/Z628V]
   Ostrom Elinor., 2009, POLYCENTRIC APPROACH
   Palatox NA, 2018, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V6, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00313
   Partelow S, 2018, ECOL SOC, V23, DOI [10.5751/ES-10594-230436, 10.5751/es-10594-230436]
   Pincetl S, 2013, GEOJOURNAL, V78, P475, DOI 10.1007/s10708-012-9446-x
   Pincetl S, 2010, ENVIRON MANAGE, V45, P227, DOI 10.1007/s00267-009-9412-7
   R Core Team, 2020, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
   Riley CB, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0228499
   Roe J, 2011, HEALTH PLACE, V17, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.09.003
   Roman LA, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P1174, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.001
   Santamouris M, 2017, SOL ENERGY, V154, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2016.12.006
   Schwarz K, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0122051
   Scott K, 2018, HUM RESOUR HEALTH, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12960-018-0304-x
   Sharifi F, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105577
   Sheridan SC, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V115, P291, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0436-2
   Shorey S, 2022, GERONTOLOGIST, V62, pE193, DOI 10.1093/geront/gnaa172
   Taha H, 2015, INT J LOW-CARBON TEC, V10, P3, DOI 10.1093/ijlct/ctt010
   United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2011, US TREES VEG RED HEA
   *US CENS BUR, 2021, QUICKFACTS
   van den Berg AE, 2010, SOC SCI MED, V70, P1203, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.002
   Vanos JK, 2012, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V51, P1639, DOI 10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0245.1
   Volin E, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126818
   Washington Post, 2001, WASHINGTON POST
   Watson WT, 2005, HORTTECHNOLOGY, V15, P118, DOI 10.21273/HORTTECH.15.1.0118
   Wilson V, 2014, EVID BASED LIB INF P, V9, P74, DOI 10.18438/B8WW3X
   Wolch JR, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
NR 74
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 2
U2 31
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2624-9634
J9 FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES
JI Front. Sustain. Cities
PD AUG 3
PY 2022
VL 4
AR 944182
DI 10.3389/frsc.2022.944182
PG 21
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology;
   Urban Studies
GA 7V8CY
UT WOS:000913041800001
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Kader, A
AF Kader, Alexander
GP IOP
TI Climate Adapted Facades in Zero-Waste and Cradle to Cradle Buildings -
   Comparison, Evaluation and Future Recommendations, e.g. in Regard to
   U-Values, G-Values, Photovoltaic Integration, Thermal Performance and
   Solar Orientation
SO 5TH WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE-URBAN
   PLANNING SYMPOSIUM (WMCAUS)
SE IOP Conference Series-Materials Science and Engineering
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT 5th World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering-Architecture-Urban
   Planning Symposium (WMCAUS)
CY JUN 15-19, 2020
CL Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC
SP LAMA Energy Grp, LAMA Gas & Oil, Prague City Tourism
AB The construction methods we are using today on a broad scale are highly unsustainable in regard to their resource efficiency. Fundamental improvements are necessary in order to change towards a more ecological future. The integration of reusable building components could be an adequate option to significantly reduce the ecological deficits we are facing today. The concepts of Zero-Waste and Cradle to Cradle are seen as viable solutions for the future. The few already existing Zero-Waste and Cradle to Cradle buildings are currently representing the most advanced construction standards of resource efficient design. In regard to their facades, however, there is still a high improvement potential. Therefore, methods have been elaborated within this research which demonstrates how the facades of Zero-Waste buildings can be strongly optimised. In particular, this research poses the question: with which interventions can we improve the performance of facades of Zero-Waste buildings? Which interventions are most important and how can we prioritize them? For example, which role does the insulation capacity of the building skin play in comparison to the building's capability for natural ventilation and external shading? Within this paper, at first, the facades of selected existing Zero-Waste and Cradle to Cradle inspired buildings are examined and critically evaluated in regard to their u-values, g-values, photovoltaic integration, thermal performance and solar orientation. Furthermore, criteria such as sun exposure of glazed areas, natural ventilation capacity through facade openings etc. are investigated. Thereafter follows an assessment in the form of a list about which interventions could significantly improve the facade's performance in regard to energy efficiency. The approaches include active strategies, such as improving the u-values, photovoltaic energy generation and passive strategies, such as enabling natural ventilation through the facade and external shading of sun exposed glazed areas. The selected case study buildings in Germany are "Aktivhaus B10" in Stuttgart by Werner Sobek, "Woodcube Building" in Hamburg by IfuH Architects and Architekturagentur, "ICON Rheinlanddamm" in Dortmund by William McDonough and Partners. In order to recommend which interventions are the best applicable in the relation between ecological performance and cost, the paper concludes with a prioritisation of the suggested improvement options. Overall, it demonstrates that the building's overall energy performance can be significantly improved by adapting the facades towards a better implementation of passive strategies which take strong advantage of the project site's individual climatic conditions.
C1 [Kader, Alexander] German Univ Technol Oman, RWTH Aachen, POB 1816, Muscat 130, Oman.
RP Kader, A (corresponding author), German Univ Technol Oman, RWTH Aachen, POB 1816, Muscat 130, Oman.
EM alexkader@gmx.de
CR Berge B, 2009, ECOLOGY BUILDING MAT, P21
   DBZ Deutsche Bauzeitschrift, 2014, DBZ DTSCH BAUZEITSCH, V3
   Hegger M., 2013, AKTIVHAUSER ENTWICKE, P130
   Kloepffer W, 2008, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V13, P89, DOI 10.1065/lca2008.02.376
   Lehmann S., 2012, DESIGNING ZERO WASTE, P284
   Lennartz M. W., 2015, NEW ARCHITECTURE WOO, P125
   McDonough W., 2002, CRADLE CRADLE REMAKI, P196
   Petersen J. P., 2014, SMART MAT HOUSE WOOD, P4
   Reggeborgh Investment & Management, 2020, MOVE FUTURE ICON BUI
   Reich K, 2017, DBZ GERMAN CONSTRUCT, V8, P26
   Vieirab C. P., 2015, P 4 INT C SOL HEAT C, P269
NR 11
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 0
U2 11
PU IOP PUBLISHING LTD
PI BRISTOL
PA DIRAC HOUSE, TEMPLE BACK, BRISTOL BS1 6BE, ENGLAND
SN 1757-8981
J9 IOP CONF SER-MAT SCI
PY 2020
VL 960
AR 032105
DI 10.1088/1757-899X/960/3/032105
PG 9
WC Engineering, Civil
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Engineering
GA BR3IJ
UT WOS:000646533100214
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Tesfay, G
   Zhao, YC
   Zhao, MY
   Li, K
   Demelash, T
   Xu, YL
AF Tesfay, Goitom
   Zhao, Yuncheng
   Zhao, Mingyue
   Li, Kuo
   Demelash, Tsedale
   Xu, Yinlong
TI Assessing the Impacts of Climate Change on Geographical Distribution of
   Tea (<i>Camellia sinensis</i> L.) in Kenya with Maximum Entropy Model
SO AGRONOMY-BASEL
LA English
DT Article
DE climate tea suitable habitats; MaxEnt model
ID SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS; FUTURE; SURFACES; MAXENT; AUC
AB Climate change has been disturbing the present species distribution ranges, resulting in the shifting of cultivation areas and decreases in production and quality. Tea (Camellia sinensis L.), which seeks optimum climatic resources, is a key cash crop economically in Kenya. In this study, the shifting of tea suitability was projected with the MaxEnt model under the SSP (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5) climate scenarios for the 2050s and 2090s relative to the 1970-2000 distribution. Analysis under the current climatic condition showed that the proportions of optimal and medium- and marginal-suitable areas were 2%, 3%, and 24% of the total area, respectively, and located in south-western (SW), central, and north-eastern (NE) Kenya and, to some extent, in the Rift Valley. It was projected that the potential suitable tea-growing areas would migrate from the western areas to the central, eastern, and north-eastern highlands in Kenya. It was detected that the precipitation of the driest period (July), precipitation of the wettest quarter (April, May, and June), and annual temperature range could be the main climatic factors determining the shift in tea distribution. Compared to the current distribution (29%), the climatically suitable areas for tea production could reach 32.58% of Kenya's land area under the SSP1-2.6 scenarios in the 2050s and 35.08% in the 2090s under the SSP5-8.5 scenario. On the contrary, it was found that the optimal climate-suitable habitats were projected to shrink by 2% and 1% in the 2050s and 2090s under all scenarios on the west side of the Great Rift Valley compared to the current distribution. In comparison, the sizes of medium- and marginal-suitable habitats would increase by 1% and 3%, respectively. The findings indicated that unless adaptive climate actions are taken, climate change could reduce the tea planting areas in western Kenya. Meanwhile, climate suitability was projected to expand upward on the east side of the Rift Valley, enhancing the potential distribution of tea. The developed climate information could be used to design and implement adaptation interventions in the lower elevation areas. Finally, we highlight that the available scientific literature on the climate suitability of tea in Kenya should be broadened by adding non-climatic factors.
C1 [Tesfay, Goitom; Zhao, Mingyue; Li, Kuo; Demelash, Tsedale; Xu, Yinlong] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Environm & Sustainable Dev Agr, 12 Zhongguancun South St, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
   [Tesfay, Goitom] Wollo Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, POB 1145, Dessie, Ethiopia.
   [Zhao, Yuncheng] Natl Meteorol Ctr, 46 Zhongguancun South St, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
C3 Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Institute of Environment &
   Sustainable Development in Agriculture, CAAS
RP Xu, YL (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Environm & Sustainable Dev Agr, 12 Zhongguancun South St, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
EM 2018y90100139@caas.cn; zhaoyc@cma.gov.cn; zhaomingyue@caas.cn;
   likuo@caas.cn; 2018y90100060@caas.cn; xuyinlong@caas.cn
RI Mareke, Goitom Tesfay/JMB-0657-2023
OI Zhao, Mingyue/0000-0002-7340-1345
FU Global Low Carbon Tea-Triangular Cooperation in Tea Value Chain in Kenya
   (GLI-TEA Kenya) [GCP/KEN/114/CPR]
FX This research was funded by Global Low Carbon Tea-Triangular Cooperation
   in Tea Value Chain in Kenya (GLI-TEA Kenya), grant number
   GCP/KEN/114/CPR.
CR Abdelaal M, 2019, ECOL INFORM, V50, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2019.01.003
   Agnes C., 2022, Int. J. Innov. Res. Adv. Stud. (IJIRAS), V9, P70
   Ahmed S.T. S., 2018, GRIN Veriag, Academic paper, P1
   [Anonymous], 2008, Report on Small-Scale Tea Sector in Kenya
   [Anonymous], 2022, International tea market: Market situation, prospects and emerging issues
   Anyango A., Climate Change Storm Threatens Kenya's Tea Production
   Azapagic A, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P4031, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.029
   Barros V, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, pIX
   Bellard C, 2012, ECOL LETT, V15, P365, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x
   Beringer T, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab649b
   Bett G.K., 2018, An Assessment of the Effects of Climate Variability on Tea Production in Kericho County: A Case Study of James Finalys (Kenya) Limited Tea Estates, Kericho, Kenya
   Bhalla N., As Climate Change Threatens Kenyan Tea, Millions of Workers Seen at Risk
   Bore J.K., 2013, Tea, VVolume 34, P59
   Bouwer R., 2021, Managing Long-Term Risks in the Tea Sector in Malawi, Kenya and Rwanda: Key Insights from the Future Climate for Africa Programme
   Bryan E., 2010, Coping with Climate Variability and Adapting to Climate Change in Kenya: Household and Community Strategies and Determinants
   CAAS, 2021, Carbon Neutral Tea Production in ChinaThree Pilot Case Studies
   Carr M.K. V., 1992, Tea, Cultivation to Consumption, P87, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-2326-64, 10.1007/978-94-011-2326-6_4, DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-2326-6_4]
   Chakraborty A, 2016, ECOL ENG, V97, P593, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.006
   Cheserek B C., 2015, Donnish Journal of Research in Environmental Studies, V2, P5
   CIAT, 2011, Future Climate Scenarios for Kenya s Tea Growing Areas
   Çoban HO, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12072671
   Das Anupam, 2009, Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. ICAI 2009, P32
   Dharmadasa M., 2018, Review of Tea Industry in Sri Lanka for Climate Analysis
   Du ZY, 2021, J ARID ENVIRON, V184, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104328
   Elbehri A., 2015, Kenya's tea sector under climate change: an impact assessment and formulation of a climate smart strategy. FAO report
   Elith J, 2006, ECOGRAPHY, V29, P129, DOI 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
   ETP, 2011, Climate Change Adaptation in the Kenyan Tea Sector
   FAO, 2015, Socio-Economic Implications of Climate Change for Tea Producing Countries
   FAO, 2013, Climate Change and Tea in Kenya: Impact Assessment and Policy Response
   FAO, 2016, REPORT WORKING GROUP, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.1.4284.5680, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.4284.5680]
   FAO, 2022, Current Global Market Situation and Emerging Issues
   Fick SE, 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P4302, DOI 10.1002/joc.5086
   Fitzgibbon A, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11091382
   Gebrewahid Y, 2020, ECOL PROCESS, V9, DOI 10.1186/s13717-019-0210-8
   Gesimba R. M., 2005, Journal of Applied Sciences, V5, P334
   GoK, 2020, Kenya's Updated Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC)
   Gunathilaka RPD, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V140, P577, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1882-z
   Han WY, 2018, BURL DODDS AGR SCI, V41, P455, DOI 10.19103/AS.2017.0036.19
   Harvey F., Tea-Growing Areas to Be Badly Hit If Global Heating Intensifies
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2023, Climate Change 2021The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844.001, DOI 10.1017/9781009157940, 10.1017/9781009157896]
   Jayasinghe SL, 2021, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/agronomy11040619
   Jayasinghe SL, 2020, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/agronomy10101536
   Jayasinghe SL, 2019, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V272, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.03.025
   Jayawardhana J.M.S., 2023, P INT FOR ENV S  BAL, VVolume 27, P1
   Jiménez-Valverde A, 2012, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V21, P498, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00683.x
   Kariuki G.M., 2022, Afr. J. Econ. Rev, V10, P2
   Karuri A.N., 2021, Adaptation of Small-Scale Tea and Coffee Farmers in Kenya to Climate Change, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-45106-6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-45106-6]
   Kimutai L.J., 2022, Afr. J. Agric. Util. Nat. Resour. Sustain. Dev, V1, P19, DOI [10.1017/S0014479701003076, DOI 10.1017/S0014479701003076]
   Kong F, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P34655, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-13121-3
   Laface VLA, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12010247
   Lawrence TJ, 2023, OUTLOOK AGR, V52, P186, DOI 10.1177/00307270231176577
   Leshamta G.T., 2017, Doctoral Dissertation
   Lobo JM, 2008, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V17, P145, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x
   Lou WP, 2021, INT J CLIMATOL, V41, pE479, DOI 10.1002/joc.6700
   Mallik P, 2022, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V147, P559, DOI 10.1007/s00704-021-03848-x
   Merow C, 2013, ECOGRAPHY, V36, P1058, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x
   Mohotti A.J., 2020, Adapting to Climate Change: A Sri Lankan Perspective, P118
   Muoki CR, 2020, FRONT PLANT SCI, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2020.00339
   Nuskiya N., 2021, KALAM Int. J, V14, P48
   Nyabundi K.W., 2017, Int. J. Tea Sci, V13, P10, DOI [10.20425/ijts.v13i01-02.9981, DOI 10.20425/IJTS.V13I01-02.9981]
   Nyairo R, 2020, CLIMATE, V8, DOI 10.3390/cli8100109
   Ochieng J, 2016, NJAS-WAGEN J LIFE SC, V77, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2016.03.005
   Owuor P. O., 2007, International Journal of Tea Science (IJTS), V6, P1
   Pearson RG, 2007, J BIOGEOGR, V34, P102, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01594.x
   Peterson A., 2019, Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions
   Phillips SJ, 2008, ECOGRAPHY, V31, P161, DOI 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x
   Phillips SJ, 2017, ECOGRAPHY, V40, P887, DOI 10.1111/ecog.03049
   Popp A, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002
   Rigden AJ, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab70be
   Rwigema D.P.-C., 2021, Strateg. J. Bus. Chang. Manag, V8, P521, DOI [10.61426/sjbcm.v8i2.2013, DOI 10.61426/SJBCM.V8I2.2013]
   Shrestha UB, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0036741
   Sriram S.A., 2023, Int. J. Manag. Commer. Innov, V10, P2021, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.7323440, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.7323440]
   Suryani A, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14095611
   Tang XG, 2021, FRONT PLANT SCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2021.652500
   TANTON TW, 1982, EXP AGR, V18, P53, DOI 10.1017/S0014479700013429
   UNIDO, 2017, Adaptation and Mitigation in the Kenyan Tea Industry
   Wachira F, 2002, EUPHYTICA, V127, P289, DOI 10.1023/A:1020273616349
   Wei B, 2018, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V16, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00477
   Wijeratne M. A., 2007, Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka, V35, P119
   WMO (World Meteorological Organization), 2024, State of global climate 2023, P3, DOI [10.18356/9789263113474, DOI 10.18356/9789263113474]
   Worthington TA, 2016, ECOL MODEL, V342, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.09.016
   Yan HY, 2020, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V21, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00856
   Yan YL, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abede6
   Zhang Xiaoling, 2019, Biodiversity Science, V27, P595, DOI 10.17520/biods.2019085
   Zhao YC, 2022, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/agronomy12123192
   Zhao YC, 2021, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/agriculture11111122
NR 87
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 3
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4395
J9 AGRONOMY-BASEL
JI Agronomy-Basel
PD SEP
PY 2024
VL 14
IS 9
AR 2080
DI 10.3390/agronomy14092080
PG 23
WC Agronomy; Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Plant Sciences
GA H9D5D
UT WOS:001326367700001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Moradian, S
   Coleman, L
   Kazmierczak, B
   Olbert, AI
AF Moradian, Sogol
   Coleman, Liz
   Kazmierczak, Bartosz
   Olbert, Agnieszka I.
TI How to Choose the Most Proper Representative Climate Model Over a Study
   Region? a Case Study of Precipitation Simulations in Ireland with
   NEX-GDDP-CMIP6 Data
SO WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; Precipitation projections; Multi-criteria decision
   making; Decision support system-based approaches; Policy; Data analysis
ID CMIP5; TEMPERATURE; TOPSIS; RAINFALL; IMPACTS; GCM
AB With the aim of providing a multi-criteria decision-support system to capture the spatio-temporal climatological patterns derived from climate models and identify the best representative climate model over each target area, this study developed a toolbox. This toolbox includes (1) climate data from observations and simulations, (2) a broad range of statistical and categorical metrics to quantify the models' assessment, and (3) a multi-criteria decision-making method of the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) as the central engine, where the climate models are investigated and ranked based on the applied evaluation metrics. To make the concept more tangible, the procedure was utilised for the case of Ireland where the effectiveness of precipitation estimates from the new version of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Earth Exchange (NEX) Global Daily Downscaled Projections (GDDP) is analysed. The applied archive comprises downscaled hindcast projections based on the outputs from the Phase 6 of the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Using a set of 13 categorical and statistical metrics, 34 NEX-GDDP-CMIP6 models were compared to the reference data from the Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP) dataset in a 25-year period of 1990-2014. A comprehensive evaluation was done at different temporal scales of daily, monthly and annual. The obtained findings illustrate that the reliability of the estimations varies significantly across time and space. The NEX-GDDP-CMIP6 models, best reproducing the climatological and spatio-temporal features of rainfall data in wetter areas of Ireland, do not perform well in the drier zones and vice versa. Therefore, there is a strong uncertainty in choosing the best representative model. As a result, this framework uses the TOPSIS method, prioritizing the applied 34 climate models based on the employed metrics. This toolbox is easily replicable for other case studies, which can be used as a guideline for policy makers, hydrologists, as well as climate scientists for choosing the best climate model over each target area according to the prediction task: water resources allocation, flood and disaster preparedness, ecosystem conservation, agriculture security, public health, infrastructure planning and risk assessment, hydropower energy, coastal management and climate adaptation and mitigation strategies.
C1 [Moradian, Sogol; Olbert, Agnieszka I.] Univ Galway, Coll Sci & Engn, Galway, Ireland.
   [Moradian, Sogol; Olbert, Agnieszka I.] Univ Galway, EHIRG EcoHydroInformat Res Grp, Galway, Ireland.
   [Coleman, Liz; Olbert, Agnieszka I.] Univ Galway, MaREI Res Ctr Energy, Climate & Marine, Galway, Ireland.
   [Kazmierczak, Bartosz] Wroclaw Univ Technol, Environm Engn, Wroclaw, Poland.
   [Olbert, Agnieszka I.] Univ Galway, Ryan Inst Environm, Marine & Energy Res, Galway, Ireland.
C3 Ollscoil na Gaillimhe-University of Galway; Ollscoil na
   Gaillimhe-University of Galway; Ollscoil na Gaillimhe-University of
   Galway; Wroclaw University of Science & Technology; Ollscoil na
   Gaillimhe-University of Galway
RP Moradian, S (corresponding author), Univ Galway, Coll Sci & Engn, Galway, Ireland.; Moradian, S (corresponding author), Univ Galway, EHIRG EcoHydroInformat Res Grp, Galway, Ireland.
EM sogolmoradian@live.com
RI Kazmierczak, Bartosz/AAO-2612-2020
OI Kazmierczak, Bartosz/0000-0003-4933-8451
FU Environmental Protection Agency [2021-CCEN-CT7_1056]; Environmental
   Protection Agency (EPA), Ireland [GOIPD/2023/1627]; Irish Research
   Council (IRC), Ireland [22/NCF/DR/11286]; Science Foundation Ireland-
   National Challenge Fund (SFI-NCF), Ireland
FX This study has been funded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
   Ireland (project code: 2021-CCEN-CT7_1056) and the Irish Research
   Council (IRC), Ireland (project code: GOIPD/2023/1627) and the Science
   Foundation Ireland- National Challenge Fund (SFI-NCF), Ireland (project
   code: 22/NCF/DR/11286).
CR Agrawal Arun., 2008, ROLE LOCAL I ADAPTAT, DOI [10.1596/28274, 10.1007/978-0-387-75217-4_1]
   Ahmed K, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11020210
   Albahri AS, 2021, ARTIF INTELL MED, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101983
   Andermann C, 2011, GEOCHEM GEOPHY GEOSY, V12, DOI 10.1029/2011GC003513
   Assamnew AD, 2020, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V142, P1169, DOI 10.1007/s00704-020-03357-3
   Battiston S, 2021, J FINANC STABIL, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100867
   Beck HE, 2019, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V23, P207, DOI 10.5194/hess-23-207-2019
   Beck HE, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P6201, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-6201-2017
   Belo-Pereira M, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V116, DOI 10.1029/2010JD015481
   Blong R, 2021, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3389/feart.2021.740695
   Cheng LY, 2015, CLIM DYNAM, V44, P2947, DOI 10.1007/s00382-015-2625-y
   Dau QV, 2021, ENVIRON PROCESS, V8, P77, DOI 10.1007/s40710-020-00475-y
   Deepthi B, 2022, ATMOS RES, V278, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106333
   Desamsetti S, 2019, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V145, P3175, DOI 10.1002/qj.3612
   Deveci M, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V41, P777, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.034
   Domonkos P, 2020, INT J CLIMATOL, V40, P6458, DOI 10.1002/joc.6592
   Dong TY, 2021, CLIM DYNAM, V57, P1751, DOI 10.1007/s00382-021-05773-1
   Duan Z, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V573, P1536, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.213
   Fajardo J, 2020, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V11, P656, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.13360
   Fallah A, 2020, INT J CLIMATOL, V40, P4102, DOI 10.1002/joc.6445
   Gampe D, 2017, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V4, DOI 10.3390/hydrology4040053
   Gharbia SS, 2020, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/hydrology7030039
   Gharbia SS, 2016, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V2, DOI 10.1007/s40808-016-0154-2
   Gharbia SS, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V633, P571, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.208
   Gouda KC, 2018, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V21, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2018.05.001
   Guo H, 2021, ATMOS RES, V252, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105451
   Gusain A, 2020, ATMOS RES, V232, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104680
   Hamed MM, 2022, INT J CLIMATOL, V42, P4316, DOI 10.1002/joc.7468
   Hwang C.L., 1981, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications A 885 State -of -the -Art Survey, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-93, 10.1007/978-3-642-83555-1_5, 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9]
   Hwang S, 2013, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V17, P4481, DOI 10.5194/hess-17-4481-2013
   IPCC, 2018, Summary for policy makers
   Iqbal Z, 2021, ATMOS RES, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105525
   Khan N, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10121793
   Kuo YH, 2020, J ATMOS SCI, V77, P379, DOI 10.1175/JAS-D-19-0132.1
   Langroudi MZA, 2013, GROUP DECIS NEGOT, V22, P851, DOI 10.1007/s10726-012-9296-4
   Li Y, 2021, ATMOS RES, V253, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105406
   Li ZY, 2022, EARTHS FUTURE, V10, DOI 10.1029/2021EF002500
   Mehran A, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V119, P1695, DOI 10.1002/2013JD021152
   Moradian S, 2023, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101523
   Moradian S, 2023, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113147
   Moradian S, 2023, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V37, P2447, DOI 10.1007/s11269-022-03272-4
   Moradian S, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V826, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154124
   Moradian S, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V108, P1089, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04721-w
   Nasrollahi N, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P2847, DOI 10.1002/2014WR016318
   Omrani H, 2023, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V25, P5899, DOI 10.1007/s10668-022-02285-8
   Omrani H, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V203, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.238
   Ortega G, 2021, INT J CLIMATOL, V41, P6713, DOI 10.1002/joc.7221
   Nguyen P, 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V22, P5801, DOI 10.5194/hess-22-5801-2018
   Raghavan SV, 2018, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V132, P989, DOI 10.1007/s00704-017-2111-z
   Rivera JA, 2020, ATMOS RES, V241, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104953
   Ryan C, 2022, INT J CLIMATOL, V42, P4040, DOI 10.1002/joc.7475
   Siabi E.K., 2021, Environmental Challenges, V5, P100299, DOI [10.1016/j.envc.2021.100299, DOI 10.1016/J.ENVC.2021.100299]
   García-Cascales MS, 2012, MATH COMPUT MODEL, V56, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.12.022
   Stouffer RJ, 2017, B AM METEOROL SOC, V98, P95, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00013.1
   Taylor KE, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P485, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
   Tegegne G, 2021, ENVIRON PROCESS, V8, P59, DOI 10.1007/s40710-020-00474-z
   Thrasher B, 2022, SCI DATA, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41597-022-01393-4
   Vuong QH, 2021, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V28, P30, DOI 10.1002/csr.2029
   Weber EU, 2010, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V1, P332, DOI 10.1002/wcc.41
   Yang XL, 2021, ADV ATMOS SCI, V38, P817, DOI 10.1007/s00376-021-0351-4
   Yazdandoost F, 2021, J ARID LAND, V13, P891, DOI 10.1007/s40333-021-0091-4
   Yazdandoost F, 2021, ATMOS RES, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105369
   Yazdandoost F, 2020, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V34, P4831, DOI 10.1007/s11269-020-02693-3
   Yeggina S, 2020, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V140, P1495, DOI 10.1007/s00704-020-03175-7
   Zaidan BB, 2018, MEASUREMENT, V117, P277, DOI 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.12.019
   Zarrin A, 2021, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V144, P643, DOI 10.1007/s00704-021-03568-2
   Zazulie N, 2018, CLIM DYNAM, V51, P2913, DOI 10.1007/s00382-017-4056-4
   Zhang ZP, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14148654
   Zhu YY, 2020, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V11, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2020.08.001
NR 69
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 11
U2 27
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 0920-4741
EI 1573-1650
J9 WATER RESOUR MANAG
JI Water Resour. Manag.
PD JAN
PY 2024
VL 38
IS 1
BP 215
EP 234
DI 10.1007/s11269-023-03665-z
EA NOV 2023
PG 20
WC Engineering, Civil; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Water Resources
GA EV6D2
UT WOS:001107444800001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU O'Neill, BF
   Williams, J
AF O'Neill, Brian F.
   Williams, Joe
TI Progress in understanding the social dimensions of desalination and
   future research directions
SO GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE Political ecology of desalination; Global desalination industry; Green
   new deal and the blue economy; Social research on ocean issues;
   Infrastructure studies; Transboundary research; Environmental sociology
ID WATER; ENERGY; TECHNOLOGY; POLITICS; ARIZONA; STATE
AB The piece outlines the contributions of key works in the field of the political ecology of desalination over the past decade. We note that the field is diverse in terms of contributions from geographers, sociologists, anthropologists, and public policy scholars. The research to date has been concerned with the ways in which the deployment of desalting techniques can reflect and reinforce social processes of inequality, political power and economic flows. In this way, desalination has been opened up for intellectual debate beyond technical considerations of the desalting industry and engineers. A critical perspective that complements the recent discussions of environmental harm caused by the desalination industry has emerged as well across a number of global and transboundary contexts. A number of themes emerged that will continue to be of interest to scholars and that need to be addressed in the years ahead. First, desalination intersects transboundary water governance and geopolitics between different water uses and emerges from complex assemblages of local and global actors, including financial actors, water companies, governments, technologies, and natural forces. Second, critical scholarship on desalination needs to continue to pay attention to the interests in and overarching patterns of, the Green New Deal and Blue Economy, each of which intersect with the worlds of academia and policymaking, and involve issues of climate adaptation and mitigation. Third, questions about equity remain with desalination as it is a solution deeply imbricated in the unequal distribution of resources, and questions about representation in decision-making remain. Fourth, research on finance and infrastructure have been at the core of critical desalting research and should remain so. Fifth, there is a growing heterogeneity in terms of research in types of desalting, from reverse osmosis to inland desalting to nuclear and more. This variety will make for rich research for the years ahead. Our hope is that the epistemological, theoretical, and methodological flexibility of this area of research will remain a strong point continuing its rigor, as well as the already robust collegiality among scholars in this interesting, and still nascent field.
C1 [O'Neill, Brian F.] Evans Sch Publ Policy & Governance, 4105 George Washington Ln NE Box 353055, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.
   [Williams, Joe] Cardiff Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Cardiff, Wales.
C3 Cardiff University
RP O'Neill, BF (corresponding author), Evans Sch Publ Policy & Governance, 4105 George Washington Ln NE Box 353055, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.
EM bfoneill@uw.edu
RI O'Neill, Brian/KHY-0977-2024
FU Ocean Nexus Fellowship Program at the University of Washington
FX Brian F. O'Neill's work on this article was supported by the Ocean Nexus
   Fellowship Program at the University of Washington.
CR Ahmed FE, 2019, DESALINATION, V453, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2018.12.002
   Aviram R, 2014, WATER POLICY, V16, P609, DOI 10.2166/wp.2014.106
   Barnett J, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.004
   Bennett NJ, 2021, MAR POLICY, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104387
   Campero C, 2023, GEOGR J, V189, P231, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12429
   Fragkou MC, 2020, T I BRIT GEOGR, V45, P448, DOI 10.1111/tran.12351
   Dunlap A, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V139, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.10.008
   Flavelle C., 2023, The New York Times June 10
   Germond-Duret C, 2022, DEV CHANGE, V53, P308, DOI 10.1111/dech.12703
   Hirt P, 2017, J SOUTHWEST, V59, P264, DOI 10.1353/jsw.2017.0017
   Jones E, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V657, P1343, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.076
   Katz D, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V116, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.11.012
   Lee K, 2021, DESALINATION, V509, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2021.115066
   Loftus A, 2016, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V40, P46, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12342
   Low MC, 2020, ENVIRON HIST-UK, V26, P145, DOI 10.3197/096734018X15254461646549
   McEvoy J, 2015, WATER-SUI, V7, P5224, DOI 10.3390/w7105224
   McEvoy J, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P353, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.11.001
   Mumme SP, 2017, WATER INT, V42, P777, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2017.1373320
   O'Neill BF, 2023, WATER ALTERN, V16, P480
   O'Neill BF, 2023, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V6, P1366, DOI 10.1177/25148486221102377
   O'Neill BF, 2020, J WORLD SYST RES, V26, P318, DOI 10.5195/JWSR.2020.987
   ONeill B.F., 2024, World Water Policy, V10, P16, DOI [10.1002/wwp2.12162, DOI 10.1002/WWP2.12162]
   ONeill B.F., Natur. Water, V1, P994, DOI [10.1038/s44221-023-00161-x, DOI 10.1038/S44221-023-00161-X]
   ONeill BF., 2023, Human Geography, V15, P311, DOI [10.1177/19427786221098700, DOI 10.1177/19427786221098700]
   ONeill BF., 2023, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, V34, P107, DOI [10.1080/10455752.2022.2126130, DOI 10.1080/10455752.2022.2126130]
   Patel EJ, 2023, WATER ALTERN, V16, P509
   Pryke M, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P1326, DOI 10.1177/0042098017742288
   Swyngedouw E, 2016, WATER INT, V41, P54, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2016.1107705
   Swyngedouw E, 2013, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V103, P261, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2013.754688
   Tal A, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10020197
   Tubi A, 2021, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V12, DOI 10.1002/wcc.695
   Usher M, 2019, T I BRIT GEOGR, V44, P110, DOI 10.1111/tran.12256
   Velásquez C, 2023, WATER ALTERN, V16, P632
   Whiteley JohnM., 2008, Water, Place, Equity
   Williams J, 2018, TAPPING THE OCEANS: SEAWATER DESALINATION AND THE POLITICAL ECOLOGY OF WATER, P1, DOI 10.4337/9781788113816
   Williams J, 2023, WATER ALTERN, V16, P429
   Williams J, 2022, WATER ALTERN, V15, P193
   Williams J, 2018, WATER ALTERN, V11, P847
   Williams J, 2018, GEOFORUM, V93, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.04.022
   Yoon H, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10030824
NR 40
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 0
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0959-3780
EI 1872-9495
J9 GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG
JI Glob. Environ. Change-Human Policy Dimens.
PD JUL
PY 2024
VL 87
AR 102877
DI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102877
EA JUN 2024
PG 4
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies; Geography
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography
GA XA6A5
UT WOS:001258987700001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Blanco-Sacristan, J
   Johansen, K
   Duarte, CM
   Daffonchio, D
   Hoteit, I
   McCabe, MF
AF Blanco-Sacristan, Javier
   Johansen, Kasper
   Duarte, Carlos M.
   Daffonchio, Daniele
   Hoteit, Ibrahim
   McCabe, Matthew F.
TI Mangrove distribution and afforestation potential in the Red Sea
SO SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Species distribution; Carbon sequestration; MaxEnt; Mangroves
ID GULF-OF-CALIFORNIA; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; GLOBAL
   DISTRIBUTION; NUTRIENT DYNAMICS; ORGANIC-CARBON; CONSERVATION; FORESTS;
   SENTINEL-2; CLASSIFICATION
AB Mangrove ecosystems represent one of the most effective natural environments for fixing and storing carbon (C). Man-groves also offer significant co-benefits, serving as nurseries for marine species, providing nutrients and food to support marine ecosystems, and stabilizing coastlines from erosion and extreme events. Given these considerations, mangrove afforestation and associated C sequestration has gained considerable attention as a nature-based solution to climate adaptation (e.g., protect against more frequent storm surges) and mitigation (e.g. offsetting other C-producing activi-ties). To advance our understanding and description of these important ecosystems, we leverage Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 satellite data to provide a current assessment of mangrove extent within the Red Sea region and also explore the effect of spatial resolution on mapping accuracy. We establish that Sentinel-2 provides a more precise spatial record of extent and subsequently use these data together with a maximum entropy (MaxEnt) modeling approach to: i) map the distribution of Red Sea mangrove systems, and ii) identify potential areas for future afforestation. From these cur-rent and potential mangrove distribution maps, we then estimate the carbon sequestration rate for the Red Sea (as well as for each bordering country) using a meta-analysis of sequestration values surveyed from the available literature. For the mangrove classification, we obtained mapping accuracies of 98 %, with a total Red Sea mangrove extent estimated at approximately 175 km(2). Based on the MaxEnt approach, which used soil physical and environmental variables to identify the key factors limiting mangrove growth and distribution, an area of nearly 410 km(2) was identified for potential mangrove afforestation expansion. The factors constraining the potential distribution of mangroves were re-lated to soil physical properties, likely reflecting the low sediment load and limited nutrient input of the Red Sea. The current rate of carbon sequestration was calculated as 1034.09 +/- 180.53 Mg C yr(-1), and the potential sequestration rate as 2424.49 +/- 423.26 Mg C yr(-1). While our results confirm the maintenance of a positive trend in mangrove growth over the last few decades, they also provide the upper bounds on above ground carbon sequestration potential for the Red Sea mangroves.
C1 [Blanco-Sacristan, Javier; Johansen, Kasper; McCabe, Matthew F.] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol, Div Biol & Environm Sci & Engn, Climate & Livabil Initiat, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
   [Duarte, Carlos M.] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol, Red Sea Res Ctr, Computat Biosci Res Ctr, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
   [Daffonchio, Daniele] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol, Red Sea Res Ctr, Div Biol & Environm Sci & Engn, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
   [Hoteit, Ibrahim] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol, Div Phys Sci & Engn, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
C3 King Abdullah University of Science & Technology; King Abdullah
   University of Science & Technology; King Abdullah University of Science
   & Technology; King Abdullah University of Science & Technology
RP Blanco-Sacristan, J (corresponding author), King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol, Div Biol & Environm Sci & Engn, Climate & Livabil Initiat, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
EM javier.blancosacristan@kaust.edu.sa
RI Daffonchio, Daniele/AAF-4922-2019; McCabe, Matthew/G-5194-2011; Duarte,
   Carlos M./A-7670-2013
OI McCabe, Matthew/0000-0002-1279-5272; Daffonchio,
   Daniele/0000-0003-0947-925X; Duarte, Carlos M./0000-0002-1213-1361;
   Hoteit, Ibrahim/0000-0002-3751-4393
FU King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST); KAUST
   Circular Carbon Initiative
FX Research reported in this publication was supported by the King Abdullah
   University of Science and Technology (KAUST) and the KAUST Circular
   Carbon Initiative.
CR Aburto-Oropeza O, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P10456, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0804601105
   Adame MF, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056569
   Ai-But'hie IM, 2002, HABITAT INT, V26, P1
   ALEEM AA, 1990, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V208, P7, DOI 10.1007/BF00008438
   Almahasheer H, 2016, FRONT MAR SCI, V3, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2016.00271
   Almahasheer H, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-10424-9
   Almahasheer H, 2016, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V169, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.11.027
   Alongi D.M., 2009, Introduction in the Energetics of Mangrove Forests
   Alongi DM, 2008, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V76, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.08.024
   Alongi DM, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9100596
   Alongi DM, 2014, ANNU REV MAR SCI, V6, P195, DOI 10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135020
   Anton A, 2020, FRONT MAR SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2020.00597
   Arreola-Lizárraga JA, 2004, AQUAT BOT, V79, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.aquabot.2004.01.012
   Arshad M, 2020, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V192, DOI 10.1007/s10661-020-8140-6
   Arshad M, 2018, FUND APPL LIMNOL, V192, P53, DOI 10.1127/fal/2018/1127
   Assis J, 2018, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V27, P277, DOI 10.1111/geb.12693
   Badr NBE, 2009, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V155, P509, DOI 10.1007/s10661-008-0452-x
   BALL MC, 1988, AUST J PLANT PHYSIOL, V15, P447, DOI 10.1071/PP9880447
   Barber RA, 2022, DIVERS DISTRIB, V28, P128, DOI 10.1111/ddi.13442
   Basheer M.A., 2019, EGYPTIAN J AQUAT BIO, V23, P27
   Bastin JF, 2019, SCIENCE, V365, P76, DOI 10.1126/science.aax0848
   Berumen ML, 2019, CORAL REEFS WORLD, V11, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-05802-9_1
   Bojang E., 2009, RELEVANCE MANGROVE F
   Booth JM, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-43980-3
   Booth JM, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-40315-0
   Bradley AP, 1997, PATTERN RECOGN, V30, P1145, DOI 10.1016/S0031-3203(96)00142-2
   Brander LM, 2012, ECOSYST SERV, V1, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.003
   Breda N.J. J., 2008, Encyclopedia of Ecology, P2148, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00849-1
   Breiman L., 1984, Classification and Regression Trees, DOI 10.1201/9781315139470
   Breiman L., 1998, Ann Statist, V26, P801, DOI DOI 10.1214/AOS/1024691079
   BURCHETT MD, 1989, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V75, P299, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1989.tb06185.x
   Bütikofer L, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P6657, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15358
   Cárdenas NY, 2017, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V63, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2017.07.004
   Chakraborty A, 2016, ECOL ENG, V97, P593, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.006
   Charrua AB, 2020, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V189, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105145
   Chaudhari P.R., 2013, INT J SCI RES PUBLIC, V3, P2250
   Chen N, 2020, J APPL REMOTE SENS, V14, DOI 10.1117/1.JRS.14.014508
   Chithambaran S., 2019, Restoration of mangrove vegetation at Red Sea coast, Saudi Arabia
   Costa R.S., 2016, Open access Library Journal, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.4236/OALIB.1102777
   De Grissac A.J., 2007, ERITREAS COASTAL MAR
   DeLeo J. M., 1993, [1993] Proceedings Second International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, P318, DOI 10.1109/ISUMA.1993.366750
   Donato DC, 2011, NAT GEOSCI, V4, P293, DOI [10.1038/NGEO1123, 10.1038/ngeo1123]
   Drusch M, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V120, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.026
   EFRON B, 1991, SCIENCE, V253, P390, DOI 10.1126/science.253.5018.390
   Eid EM, 2020, OCEANOLOGIA, V62, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.oceano.2019.12.001
   Eid EM, 2016, REG STUD MAR SCI, V3, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.rsma.2015.05.006
   Elith J, 2011, DIVERS DISTRIB, V17, P43, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
   Fatoyinbo TE, 2013, INT J REMOTE SENS, V34, P668, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2012.712224
   Fatoyinbo TE, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V113, DOI 10.1029/2007JG000551
   Feller IC, 2003, OECOLOGIA, V134, P405, DOI 10.1007/s00442-002-1117-z
   Fick SE, 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P4302, DOI 10.1002/joc.5086
   FISHER WD, 1958, J AM STAT ASSOC, V53, P789, DOI 10.2307/2281952
   Fouda M.M., 1994, IMPLICATIONS CLIMATE
   Franklin J, 2010, Mapping species distributions, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511810602, 10.1017/CBO9780511810602]
   Geospatial Authority for Survey and Geospatial Information, 2021, SAUDI TIDE TABLES
   Giri C, 2011, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V20, P154, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00584.x
   Gladstone W, 1994, MANAGEMENT PLAN FARA
   Goldberg L, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P5844, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15275
   Gorelick N, 2017, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V202, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
   Guisan A, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P993, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x
   Hamilton SE, 2016, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V25, P729, DOI 10.1111/geb.12449
   HANLEY JA, 1982, RADIOLOGY, V143, P29, DOI 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747
   Hastenrath S., 1979, Climatic Atlas of the Indian Ocean: Surface climate and atmospheric circulation
   Hereher ME, 2016, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V75, DOI 10.1007/s12665-015-4835-3
   Hijmans R., 2020, **DATA OBJECT**
   Hoyos R, 2013, REV BIOL TROP, V61, P1445
   Hu WJ, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V748, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142321
   Huang L.Y., 2015, Theses and Dissertations
   Hutchings P., 1987, Ecology of Mangroves
   Jayasinghe SL, 2019, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V272, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.03.025
   Jayathilake DRM, 2018, BIOL CONSERV, V226, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.009
   Jiménez-Valverde A, 2008, DIVERS DISTRIB, V14, P885, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00496.x
   Johnston CA, 2004, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V2, P522, DOI 10.2307/3868382
   Kaky E, 2016, J ARID ENVIRON, V135, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.09.001
   Kelleher G., 1995, GLOBAL REPRESENTATIV
   Khalil ASM, 2015, SPRING EARTH SYST SC, P585, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-45201-1_33
   Krauss KW, 2014, NEW PHYTOL, V202, P19, DOI 10.1111/nph.12605
   Kristensen E, 2008, AQUAT BOT, V89, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.005
   Lawrence RL, 2001, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V67, P1137
   Lee SY, 2019, NAT ECOL EVOL, V3, P870, DOI 10.1038/s41559-019-0861-y
   Lee SY, 2014, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V23, P726, DOI 10.1111/geb.12155
   Lewis RR, 2005, ECOL ENG, V24, P403, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.10.003
   Liao B., 2014, WETLAND SCI, V12, P435, DOI 10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2014.04.005
   Lovelock CE, 2019, BIOL LETTERS, V15, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0781
   Lovelock CE, 2016, TREE PHYSIOL-NETH, V6, P149, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-27422-5_7
   Lyons MB, 2018, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V208, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.026
   Macreadie PI, 2021, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V2, P826, DOI 10.1038/s43017-021-00224-1
   Mandura A.S., 1997, MANGROVES SALT MARSH, V1, P255, DOI [10.1023/A:1009927605517, DOI 10.1023/A:1009927605517]
   Matilal S., 1986, STUDIES SOIL VEGETAT
   McCabe MF, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P10017, DOI 10.1002/2017WR022240
   Mcleod E, 2011, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V9, P552, DOI 10.1890/110004
   McNally CG, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P13945, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1101825108
   Mondal P, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11242928
   Muhsoni FF, 2018, INT J GEOMATE, V14, P42, DOI 10.21660/2018.45.7177
   NAIDOO G, 1982, S AFR J BOT, V1, P85, DOI 10.1016/S0022-4618(16)30155-3
   Newbold T, 2010, PROG PHYS GEOG, V34, P3, DOI 10.1177/0309133309355630
   Osland MJ, 2017, ECOL MONOGR, V87, P341, DOI 10.1002/ecm.1248
   Palmer MW, 2002, ENVIRONMETRICS, V13, P121, DOI 10.1002/env.516
   Pantaleoni E, 2009, INT J REMOTE SENS, V30, P3423, DOI 10.1080/01431160802562214
   PERSGA, 2011, GD00110 PERSGA, P1
   PERSGA/GEF, 1998, STRATEGIC ACTION PRO, V1
   PERSGA/GEF, 2001, STRATEGIC ACTION PRO
   Phillips SJ, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V190, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
   Phillips SJ, 2004, P 21 INT C MACH LEAR, P655, DOI DOI 10.1145/1015330.1015412
   Phillips SJ, 2017, ECOGRAPHY, V40, P887, DOI 10.1111/ecog.03049
   PRICE ARG, 1987, J NAT HIST, V21, P449, DOI 10.1080/00222938700771121
   Purnamasari E, 2021, REG STUD MAR SCI, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101730
   Quisthoudt K, 2012, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V26, P1919, DOI 10.1007/s00468-012-0760-1
   Raats M. M., 1992, Food Quality and Preference, V3, P89, DOI 10.1016/0950-3293(91)90028-D
   Raitsos DE, 2015, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V42, P855, DOI 10.1002/2014GL062882
   Rasul NMA, 2015, SPRING EARTH SYST SC, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-45201-1_1
   Richards DR, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-18118-z
   Robertson A.I., 1992, TROPICAL MANGROVE EC
   Root TL, 2006, CONSERV BIOL, V20, P706, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00465.x
   Rouse J.W., 1974, NASAGSFC FINAL REPOR, P1
   Royal-Commission-Yanbu, 2013, SUST REP
   Saderne V, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab76da
   Saenger P., 2007, PERGA GEF REGIONAL A, P101
   Saenger P., 2002, MANGROVE ECOLOGY SIL
   Saintilan N, 2020, SCIENCE, V368, P1118, DOI 10.1126/science.aba2656
   Sandilyan S, 2012, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V21, P3523, DOI 10.1007/s10531-012-0388-x
   Sasmito SD, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P4291, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14774
   Shaltout K.H., 2005, ASSESSMENT MANAGEMEN
   Shaltout KH, 2020, OCEANOLOGIA, V62, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.oceano.2019.08.002
   Shaltout M, 2019, OCEANOLOGIA, V61, P484, DOI 10.1016/j.oceano.2019.05.002
   Sheppard C., 1992, P1
   Siikamäki J, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P14369, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1200519109
   Spalding M., 2010, World Atlas of Mangroves, DOI [10.4324/9781849776608, 10.34892/w2ew-m835]
   Spurgeon J, 2002, CONSERVATION SUSTAIN
   STORY M, 1986, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V52, P397
   Svenning JC, 2004, ECOL LETT, V7, P565, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00614.x
   Tadono T, 2016, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V41, P157, DOI 10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B4-157-2016
   Tang WW, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10020472
   Venables W. N., 2002, Modern Applied Statistics with S, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
   Vessella F, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V304, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.006
   Wang DZ, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10091468
   Wang L, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V231, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111223
   Wang YY, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V788, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147914
   Wei B, 2018, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V16, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00477
   Worthington T., 2018, MANGROVE RESTORATION, DOI [DOI 10.17863/CAM.39153, 10.17863/CAM.39153]
   Yao YiFeng Yao YiFeng, 2011, Forestry Studies in China, V13, P173, DOI 10.1007/s11632-011-0209-4
   Yue YJ, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V688, P1308, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.153
   Zahran M.A., 2008, VEG EGYPT, V2, P305
   Zellmer AJ, 2019, FRONT MAR SCI, V6, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2019.00003
   Zhang HKK, 2018, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V215, P482, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.031
   Zhao S., 2014, 22 INT C GEOINF KAOH, P1
NR 146
TC 19
Z9 20
U1 24
U2 162
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0048-9697
EI 1879-1026
J9 SCI TOTAL ENVIRON
JI Sci. Total Environ.
PD OCT 15
PY 2022
VL 843
AR 157098
DI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157098
EA JUL 2022
PG 13
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 3D4VT
UT WOS:000829302300013
PM 35779736
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Diatta, O
   Diallo, AM
   Sanogo, D
   Nielsen, LR
   Ræbild, A
   Kjær, ED
   Hansen, JK
AF Diatta, Oulimata
   Diallo, Adja Madjiguene
   Sanogo, Diaminatou
   Nielsen, Lene Rostgaard
   Raebild, Anders
   Kjaer, Erik Dahl
   Hansen, Jon Kehlet
TI Variation in phenology of<i> Acacia</i><i> senegal</i> (L.) Wild. in
   relation to origin and ploidy level: Implications for climatic
   adaptation
SO GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION
LA English
DT Article
DE Flowering; Fruiting; Genetic variation; Leafing; Sahel; Senegalia
   senegal
ID BLUE NILE REGION; GENETIC-VARIATION; PLANT PHENOLOGY; BREEDING SYSTEM;
   LEAF PHENOLOGY; WEST-AFRICA; WATER-USE; FOREST; PROVENANCES; SAVANNA
AB Correct timing of phenology is crucial for the survival and growth of species in arid areas with long dry seasons. Nevertheless, knowledge on genetic variation and adaptive patterns in phenology in deciduous African dryland species is limited. Here we study the variation in phenology of diploid and polypoid A. senegal trees from rangewide populations growing in a common garden trial in Senegal and test correlations between population phenology and climate at the site of origin. The leafing, flowering and fruiting phenology was monitored during 17 months and compared to detailed observations of the rainfall in the common garden during the period. We found that A. senegal trees in general started development of leaves prior to the beginning of the rainy season with flowering and fruiting initiation occurring during the rainy season. The results lead us to conclude that is was not the rain per se that initiated leaf development. We also conclude that phenology in A. senegal is under genetic control, because significant differences could be observed among populations and ploidy levels when grown at the same site. In general, early leaf flushing trees had a longer growing period and performed better in terms of growth at the tested site and the results thus support that leaf phenology influence fitness. We further found that differences among trees in phenology seem to be associated with differences in climate at their site of origin, because the timing of leaf development in the common garden and the timing of the rainy season at the site of origin was significantly correlated for the diploid trees (not for tetraploids). However, it was diploid trees from sites with a late arriving rainy season that developed leaves earliest in the year. The environmental cues that control leafing phenology and the associated physiological mechanisms therefore still need to be identified in order to understand how the variation among populations has evolved, its relationship to local adaptation and the implication for smart transfer of seed sources as mean to mitigate changing growing conditions related to global warming.
C1 [Diatta, Oulimata; Nielsen, Lene Rostgaard; Raebild, Anders; Kjaer, Erik Dahl; Hansen, Jon Kehlet] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Geosci & Nat Resource Management, Rolighedsvej 23, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
   [Diatta, Oulimata; Diallo, Adja Madjiguene; Sanogo, Diaminatou] Ctr Natl Rech Forestieres CNRF ISRA, Inst Senegalais Rech Agr, Route Peres Maristes,BP 2312, Dakar, Senegal.
C3 University of Copenhagen
RP Diatta, O (corresponding author), Univ Copenhagen, Dept Geosci & Nat Resource Management, Rolighedsvej 23, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
EM diatta_oulimata2@yahoo.com; madjiguene.diallo@isra.sn;
   diaminatou.sanogo@isra.sn; jkh@ign.ku.dk
RI Ræbild, Anders/N-9741-2014; Nielsen, Lene/E-6769-2015; Kjaer,
   Erik/D-6534-2017; Hansen, Jon/A-6582-2015
OI Nielsen, Lene/0000-0002-7214-8691; Kjaer, Erik/0000-0001-8624-1611;
   Hansen, Jon/0000-0002-1260-3509
FU Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) , Saudi Arabia, Ph.d. Merit Scholarship
   program grant [600032772]; University of Copenhagen, Denmark
FX This study was funded by the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) , Saudi
   Arabia, Ph.d. Merit Scholarship program grant number600032772,
   University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
CR Assoumane A, 2013, TREE GENET GENOMES, V9, P93, DOI 10.1007/s11295-012-0537-0
   Bamba H, 2019, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V17, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00544
   Bates D, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V67, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   BORCHERT R, 1994, ECOLOGY, V75, P1437, DOI 10.2307/1937467
   Bräutigam K, 2013, ECOL EVOL, V3, P399, DOI 10.1002/ece3.461
   Chapotin SM, 2006, NEW PHYTOL, V169, P549, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01618.x
   Cleland EE, 2007, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V22, P357, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2007.04.003
   de Bie S, 1998, J BIOGEOGR, V25, P883, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.00229.x
   Di Lucchio LM, 2018, ECOL EVOL, V8, P11261, DOI 10.1002/ece3.4600
   Diallo A.M., 2021, NEW FOREST
   Diallo AM, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00821
   Diallo AM, 2015, TREE GENET GENOMES, V11, DOI 10.1007/s11295-015-0902-x
   Diatta O, 2021, ANN FOREST SCI, V78, DOI 10.1007/s13595-021-01098-5
   Diatta O, 2022, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V36, P295, DOI 10.1007/s00468-021-02206-8
   Do FC, 2005, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V215, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.022
   Do FC, 2008, TREE PHYSIOL, V28, P95, DOI 10.1093/treephys/28.1.95
   Eamus D, 2001, ADV ECOL RES, V32, P113, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2504(01)32012-3
   Fagg CW, 2004, TROPICAL FOR PAPERS
   Gebrekirstos A, 2011, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V25, P95, DOI 10.1007/s00468-010-0467-0
   Göttsche FM, 2016, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/rs8050410
   Gray A, 2013, PLANT SOIL, V369, P479, DOI 10.1007/s11104-013-1593-4
   Harris I, 2014, INT J CLIMATOL, V34, P623, DOI 10.1002/joc.3711
   Khanduri V. P., 2014, Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, V36, P389
   Kyalangalilwa B, 2013, BOT J LINN SOC, V172, P500, DOI 10.1111/boj.12047
   Larwanou M, 2010, SILVAE GENET, V59, P210, DOI 10.1515/sg-2010-0025
   LIEBERMAN D, 1982, J ECOL, V70, P791, DOI 10.2307/2260105
   Lim PO, 2007, ANNU REV PLANT BIOL, V58, P115, DOI 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105316
   Milla R, 2006, PLANT BIOLOGY, V8, P103, DOI 10.1055/s-2005-872890
   Myers BA, 1998, AUST J ECOL, V23, P329, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1998.tb00738.x
   Nicotra AB, 2010, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V15, P684, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.008
   Odee DW, 2015, AOB PLANTS, V7, DOI 10.1093/aobpla/plv011
   Okullo JBL, 2004, AGROFOREST SYST, V60, P77, DOI 10.1023/B:AGFO.0000009407.63892.99
   Omondi S.F., 2016, INT J RES, V2016, DOI 10.1155/2016/6904834
   Ouedraogo M, 2015, THESIS U COPENHAGEN
   Panchen ZA, 2015, ANN BOT-LONDON, V116, P865, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcv015
   Parmesan C, 2006, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V37, P637, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
   Polgar C, 2014, NEW PHYTOL, V202, P106, DOI 10.1111/nph.12647
   R Core Team, 2020, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
   Raddad EY, 2006, AGROFOREST SYST, V68, P193, DOI 10.1007/s10457-006-9009-6
   Raddad EAY, 2007, NEW FOREST, V34, P207, DOI 10.1007/s11056-007-9049-4
   Raddad EY, 2006, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V226, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.01.036
   Raebild A., 2003, TRIAL 8 ARID ZONES S, V3
   Raebild A., 2003, TRIAL NO 5 ARID ZONE, V7
   Raebild A., 2003, TRIAL NO 12 ARID ZON, V5, P14
   Ræbild A, 2011, NEW FOREST, V41, P297, DOI 10.1007/s11056-010-9237-5
   RATHCKE B, 1985, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V16, P179, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.001143
   Revelle WR., 2017, How to: Use the Psych Package for Factor Analysis and Data Reduction
   Ryan CM, 2017, NEW PHYTOL, V213, P625, DOI 10.1111/nph.14262
   Seghieri J, 2012, PLANT ECOL, V213, P861, DOI 10.1007/s11258-012-0048-y
   Singh KP, 2006, ANN BOT-LONDON, V97, P265, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcj028
   Tagesson T, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P250, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12734
   Tandon R, 2001, BOT J LINN SOC, V135, P251, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2001.tb01094.x
   Tian F, 2018, NAT ECOL EVOL, V2, P1428, DOI 10.1038/s41559-018-0630-3
   TYBIRK K, 1993, BOT J LINN SOC, V112, P107, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1993.tb00312.x
   Wickham H., 2016, J. Stat. Softw., V2nd, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4, DOI 10.18637/JSS.V077.B02]
   Wu ChaoYang Wu ChaoYang, 2013, Ecological Engineering, V60, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.07.019
NR 56
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 2
U2 12
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
EI 2351-9894
J9 GLOB ECOL CONSERV
JI Glob. Ecol. Conserv.
PD JAN
PY 2022
VL 33
AR e01957
DI 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01957
PG 15
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA XV4AQ
UT WOS:000734887000005
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Olsson, J
   Berggren, K
   Olofsson, M
   Viklander, M
AF Olsson, J.
   Berggren, K.
   Olofsson, M.
   Viklander, M.
TI Applying climate model precipitation scenarios for urban hydrological
   assessment: A case study in Kalmar City, Sweden
SO ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article; Proceedings Paper
CT 7th International Workshop on Precipitation in Urban Areas
CY DEC 07-10, 2006
CL St Moritz, SWITZERLAND
DE Rainfall; Climate change; Regional climate model; Delta change; Urban
   drainage
ID EASTERN UNITED-STATES; EXTREME RAINFALL; DRAINAGE; IMPACTS
AB There is growing interest in the impact of climate change on urban hydrological processes. Such assessment may be based on the precipitation output from climate models. To date, the model resolution in both time and space has been too low for proper assessment, but at least in time the resolution of available model output is approaching urban scales. In this paper, 30-min precipitation from a model grid box covering Kalmar City, Sweden, is compared with high-resolution (tipping-bucket) observations from a gauge in Kalmar. The model is found to overestimate the frequency of low rainfall intensities, and therefore the total volume, but reasonably well reproduce the highest intensities. Adapting climate model data to urban drainage applications can be done in several ways but a popular way is the so-called Delta Change (DC) method. In this method, relative changes in rainfall characteristics estimated from climate model output are transferred to an observed rainfall time series, generally by multiplicative factors. In this paper, a version of the method is proposed in which these DC factors (DCFs) are related to the rainfall intensity level. This is achieved by calculating changes in the probability distribution of rainfall intensities and modelling the DCFs as a function of percentile. Applying this method in Kalmar indicated that in summer and autumn, high intensities will increase by 20-60% by year 2100, whereas low intensities remain stable or decrease. In winter and spring, generally all intensity levels increase similarly. The results were transferred to the observed time series by varying the volume of the tipping bucket to reflect the estimated intensity changes on a 30-min time scale. In an evaluation of the transformed data at a higher 5-min resolution, effects on the intensity distribution as well as single precipitation events were demonstrated. In particular, qualitatively different changes in peak intensity and total volume are attainable, which is required in light of expected future changes of the precipitation process and a step forward as compared with simpler DC approaches. Using the DC transformed data as input in urban drainage simulations for a catchment in Kalmar indicated an increase of the number of surface floods by 20-45% during this century. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Olsson, J.] Swedish Meteorol & Hydrol Inst, S-60176 Norrkoping, Sweden.
   [Berggren, K.; Olofsson, M.; Viklander, M.] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, S-95187 Lulea, Sweden.
C3 Swedish Meteorological & Hydrological Institute; Lulea University of
   Technology
RP Olsson, J (corresponding author), Swedish Meteorol & Hydrol Inst, S-60176 Norrkoping, Sweden.
EM Jonas.Olsson@smhi.se
RI Olsson, Jonas/LVR-9745-2024
CR Allen RJ, 2005, J HYDROL ENG, V10, P327, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:4(327)
   Andréasson J, 2004, AMBIO, V33, P228, DOI 10.1579/0044-7447-33.4.228
   [Anonymous], 1996, Report No. 218,
   [Anonymous], 1997, Reports Meteorology and Climatology
   Arnbjerg-Nielsen K, 2006, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V54, P1, DOI 10.2166/wst.2006.572
   BERGGREN K, 2007, THESIS LULEA U TECHN
   BERNES C, 2003, WARMER WORLD
   BUISHAND TA, 1982, J HYDROL, V58, P11, DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(82)90066-X
   CARLSSON B, 2006, REPORTS HYDROLOGY, V19
   Denault C, 2006, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V42, P685, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04485.x
   Frei C, 2006, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V111, DOI 10.1029/2005JD005965
   Giorgi F, 1999, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V104, P6335, DOI 10.1029/98JD02072
   Grum M, 2006, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V54, P9, DOI 10.2166/wst.2006.592
   Hay LE, 2000, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V36, P387, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2000.tb04276.x
   Headache classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS), 2018, Cephalalgia, V38, P1, DOI [10.1177/0333102417738202, DOI 10.1177/0333102417738202, DOI 10.2833/9937]
   Hernebring C., 2006, VA FORSK PUBL
   Hewitson BC, 1996, CLIMATE RES, V7, P85, DOI 10.3354/cr007085
   Kjellstrom E., 2005, 140 YEAR SIMULATION
   Mailhot A, 2007, J HYDROL, V347, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.019
   Natural Environment Research Council, 1975, FLOOD STUD REP, VI
   NIEMCZYNOWICZ J, 1989, HYDROLOG SCI J, V34, P651, DOI 10.1080/02626668909491373
   OLOFSSON M, 2007, THESIS LULEA U TECHN
   ONOF C, 2002, TIME SERIES DESIGN E, V607
   Pagliara S, 1998, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V37, P195, DOI 10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00333-3
   Prtner H.O, 2022, Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, P3056, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844]
   Räisänen J, 2004, CLIM DYNAM, V22, P13, DOI 10.1007/s00382-003-0365-x
   Schilling W, 1991, ATMOS RES, V27, P5, DOI 10.1016/0169-8095(91)90003-F
   Schreider SY, 2000, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V47, P91, DOI 10.1023/A:1005621523177
   SEMADENIDAVIES A, 2005, IMPACTS CLIMATE CHAN
   Trenberth KE, 2003, B AM METEOROL SOC, V84, P1205, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-84-9-1205
   Waters D., 2003, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V46, P755, DOI DOI 10.1080/0964056032000138472
   Wood AW, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V107, DOI 10.1029/2001JD000659
NR 32
TC 128
Z9 142
U1 0
U2 43
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
PI NEW YORK
PA STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA
SN 0169-8095
EI 1873-2895
J9 ATMOS RES
JI Atmos. Res.
PD MAY
PY 2009
VL 92
IS 3
SI SI
BP 364
EP 375
DI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.01.015
PG 12
WC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA 437CU
UT WOS:000265464600009
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Navarro-Cerrillo, RM
   Cachinero-Vivar, AM
   Ruiz-Gómez, FJ
   Camarero, JJ
   González-Pérez, JA
   Pérez-Priego, O
AF Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael Ma
   Cachinero-Vivar, Antonio M.
   Ruiz-Gomez, Francisco J.
   Camarero, J. Julio
   Gonzalez-Perez, Jose A.
   Perez-Priego, Oscar
TI Planted or Natural Pine Forests, Which One Will Better Recover after
   Drought? Insights from Tree Growth and Stable C and H Isotopes
SO FORESTS
LA English
DT Article
DE Pinus pinaster; Pinus nigra; dendroecology; wood isotopes; delta C-13;
   delta H-2; Py-CSIA; forest die-off
ID WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; CLIMATE; MORTALITY; TRANSPIRATION; VULNERABILITY;
   RESPONSES; DECLINE; STRESS; CARBON; RATIO
AB Increasing intensity and frequency of droughts are leading to forest dieback, growth decline and tree mortality worldwide. Reducing tree-to-tree competition for water resources is a primary goal for adaptive climate silviculture strategies, particularly in reforested areas with high planting density. Yet, we need better insights into the role of stand type (i.e., natural forests versus plantations) on the resilience of pine forests to droughts across varying time scales. In this study, we combined dendrochronological data and stable C (d(13)C) and H (d(2)H) isotopes measured in tree-ring wood as well as in specific wood chromatographically isolated compounds to investigate contrasting responses to drought of natural versus planted stands of two representative pine species, i.e., Pinus pinaster and Pinus nigra in southeastern Europe. Natural stands exhibited about two-fold increase in tree-ring growth in average (basal area at 20 years-BAI(20)) as compared to planted stands. A response function analysis showed contrasting seasonal growth patterns for both species, which were related to monthly mean temperature and precipitation. Both stand type and species variables influenced growth resilience indices. Both pine species revealed contrasting resilience patterns among forest types; whereas planted stands seemed to be less sensitive to yearly droughts as determined by a higher recovery index (CRc) for P. pinaster, the contrary was found in the case of P. nigra. On the other hand, while resistance CRT and resilience CRS indices were higher for planted than natural forests in the case of P. pinaster, little differences were found for P. nigra. Beyond comparisons, carbon stable isotopes shed lights on the role of forest types in dry sites, being d(13)C consistently lower in natural than in planted forests for both pine species (p < 0.05). We concluded that planted forest assimilated more carbon as per unit of water used than natural stands in response to droughts. Both d(13)C and d(2)H isotopic signals were positively correlated for both species for planted forests. However, a lack of correlation was evidenced for natural stands. Consistent with d(13)C observations, d(2)H concentrations in woody phenolic compounds (guaiacol and oleic acid) revealed contrasting patterns among forest types. This puts forward that d(2)H concentrations in woody phenolic compounds (rather than in woody tree ring) accounts for other confounding factors in tree ring formation that can be associated with forest type. Our results highlight the value of stable isotope approaches versus conventional dendrochronological tools in drought studies and call for the consideration of forest type as an endogenous aspect defining the vulnerability of pine forests to climate.
C1 [Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael Ma; Cachinero-Vivar, Antonio M.; Ruiz-Gomez, Francisco J.; Perez-Priego, Oscar] Univ Cordoba, Sch Agr & Forestry, Lab Dendrochronol Silviculture & Climate Change, Dept Forestry,DendrodatLab ERSAF, Edif Leonardo da Vinci,Campus Rabanales S-N, E-14071 Cordoba, Spain.
   [Camarero, J. Julio] CSIC, IPE, Avda Montanana 1005, E-50192 Zaragoza, Spain.
   [Gonzalez-Perez, Jose A.] CSIC, IRNAS, Ave Reina Mercedes 10, E-41012 Seville, Spain.
C3 Universidad de Cordoba; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas
   (CSIC); CSIC - Instituto Pirenaico de Ecologia (IPE); Consejo Superior
   de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC); CSIC - Instituto de Recursos
   Naturales y Agrobiologia de Sevilla (IRNAS)
RP Navarro-Cerrillo, RM (corresponding author), Univ Cordoba, Sch Agr & Forestry, Lab Dendrochronol Silviculture & Climate Change, Dept Forestry,DendrodatLab ERSAF, Edif Leonardo da Vinci,Campus Rabanales S-N, E-14071 Cordoba, Spain.
EM rmnavarro@uco.es
RI Camarero, J./A-8602-2013; Ruiz-Gómez, Francisco/I-4823-2019;
   Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael/AAG-5872-2019; Cachinero-Vivar, Antonio
   M./LFV-1045-2024; Gonzalez-Perez, Jose A./E-5666-2010
OI Camarero, J. Julio/0000-0003-2436-2922; Navarro Cerrillo, Rafael
   M/0000-0003-3470-8640; Cachinero-Vivar, Antonio M./0000-0002-1294-2148;
   Gonzalez-Perez, Jose A./0000-0001-7607-1444; Ruiz Gomez, Francisco
   Jose/0000-0002-1999-3415
FU SILVADAPT.NET [RED2018-102719-T]; EVIDENCE [2822/2021]; REMEDIO
   [PID2021-128463OB-I00]
FX This research was funded by SILVADAPT.NET (RED2018-102719-T), EVIDENCE
   (Ref: 2822/2021) and REMEDIO (PID2021-128463OB-I00).
CR Allen CD, 2015, ECOSPHERE, V6, DOI 10.1890/ES15-00203.1
   [Anonymous], 1999, USDA AGR HDB, V2nd
   Bates D, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V67, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Battipaglia G., 2022, Stable isotopes in tree rings: inferring physiological, climatic and environmental responses, V8, P605
   Belmecheri S, 2020, DENDROCHRONOLOGIA, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.dendro.2020.125748
   Biondi F, 2008, TREE-RING RES, V64, P81, DOI 10.3959/2008-6.1
   Bogino SM, 2008, ANN FOREST SCI, V65, DOI 10.1051/forest:2008025
   Bunn AG, 2010, DENDROCHRONOLOGIA, V28, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.dendro.2009.12.001
   Caminero L, 2018, DENDROCHRONOLOGIA, V48, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.dendro.2018.01.006
   Linares JC, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P1000, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02566.x
   Cernusak L. A., 2022, STABLE ISOTOPES TREE, V8, P291
   Cherubini P, 2021, CURR FOR REP, V7, P69, DOI 10.1007/s40725-021-00137-8
   Choat B, 2018, NATURE, V558, P531, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0240-x
   Coplen TB, 2011, RAPID COMMUN MASS SP, V25, P2538, DOI 10.1002/rcm.5129
   Cormier MA, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V218, P479, DOI 10.1111/nph.15016
   De Cáceres M, 2018, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V108, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.003
   Lucas-Borja ME, 2021, FORESTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/f12091161
   FARQUHAR GD, 1982, AUST J PLANT PHYSIOL, V9, P121, DOI 10.1071/PP9820121
   Fernandes TJG, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V361, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.11.029
   Fernández-de-Uña L, 2016, J ECOL, V104, P678, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12544
   Forrester DI, 2015, TREE PHYSIOL, V35, P289, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpv011
   Frank DC, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P579, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2614
   Fritts H.C., 1976, Tree rings and climate, P1
   de la Serrana RG, 2015, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V29, P1791, DOI 10.1007/s00468-015-1261-9
   Gazol A, 2022, ECOL APPL, V32, DOI 10.1002/eap.2589
   Gessler A, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V219, P485, DOI 10.1111/nph.15154
   Gessler A, 2014, TREE PHYSIOL, V34, P796, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpu040
   Giorgi F, 2008, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V63, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.09.005
   Gonzalez-Perez J.A., 2016, P 21 INT S AN APPL P
   HARGREAVES GH, 1982, J IRR DRAIN DIV-ASCE, V108, P225
   HOLMES R L, 1983, Tree-Ring Bulletin, V43, P69
   Jiménez-Morillo NT, 2020, FOODS, V9, DOI 10.3390/foods9121855
   Camarero JJ, 2021, MANAG FOR ECOSYST, V38, P237, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-63625-8_12
   Camarero JJ, 2021, PLANT ECOL DIVERS, V14, P1, DOI 10.1080/17550874.2021.1961172
   Camarero JJ, 2015, J BIOGEOGR, V42, P2220, DOI 10.1111/jbi.12590
   Camarero JJ, 2015, J ECOL, V103, P44, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12295
   Kannenberg SA, 2022, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V322, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108996
   Lehmann MM, 2021, DENDROCHRONOLOGIA, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.dendro.2020.125788
   Lehmann MM., 2022, STABLE ISOTOPES TREE, V8, P331, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-92698-4_11
   Linares JC, 2009, OECOLOGIA, V161, P611, DOI 10.1007/s00442-009-1409-7
   Lloret F, 2011, OIKOS, V120, P1909, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19372.x
   MAGRAMA, 2017, REST FOR ESP 75 AN I
   Manrique-Alba A, 2021, FORESTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/f12080985
   Manrique-Alba A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V728, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138536
   Marshall JD, 2006, TREE PHYSIOL, V26, P1055, DOI 10.1093/treephys/26.8.1055
   Maseyk K, 2011, OECOLOGIA, V167, P573, DOI 10.1007/s00442-011-2010-4
   McDowell N, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V178, P719, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02436.x
   Meusburger K, 2022, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V28, P5928, DOI 10.1111/gcb.16332
   Moreno-Gutiérrez C, 2012, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V35, P1026, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02469.x
   Moulin JC, 2022, IAWA J, V43, P263, DOI 10.1163/22941932-bja10092
   Navarro-Cerrillo R. M., 2016, Journal of Forest Science (Prague), V62, P53, DOI 10.17221/104/2015-JFS
   Navarro-Cerrillo RM, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V433, P313, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.11.006
   Navarro-Cerrillo RM, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9060358
   Pontius J, 2014, FOREST SCI, V60, P1156, DOI 10.5849/forsci.13-121
   R Core Team, 2013, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
   Rodriguez-Vallejo C, 2021, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V479, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118537
   Rodriguez-Vallejo C, 2019, FORESTS, V10, DOI 10.3390/f10070603
   Rubio-Cuadrado A, 2021, MANAG FOR ECOSYST, V38, P141, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-63625-8_9
   Salazar-Tortosa D, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aab18f
   San-Emeterio LM, 2021, APPL SCI-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/app11156684
   Sánchez-Salguero R, 2010, FOREST SYST, V19, P458
   Sánchez-Salguero R, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V310, P956, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.050
   Sánchez-Salguero R, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V113, P767, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0372-6
   Schimmelrnann A, 2016, ANAL CHEM, V88, P4294, DOI 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04392
   Shestakova TA, 2017, FUNCT ECOL, V31, P1359, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12857
   Silvério E, 2020, FOREST SCI, V66, P178, DOI 10.1093/forsci/fxz066
   Sohn JA, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V380, P261, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.07.046
   Tyutkova E, 2023, WOOD SCI TECHNOL, V57, P289, DOI 10.1007/s00226-022-01447-1
   Valeriano C, 2021, FORESTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/f12121700
   Vicente-Serrano SM, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P52, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1207068110
   Volkmann THM, 2016, NEW PHYTOL, V210, P839, DOI 10.1111/nph.13868
   Voltas J, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V208, P1031, DOI 10.1111/nph.13569
   Wang J, 2020, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V288, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108020
   Xu B, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P901, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14843
   Yi CX, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac507b
   Zang C, 2015, ECOGRAPHY, V38, P431, DOI 10.1111/ecog.01335
NR 76
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 6
U2 19
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 1999-4907
J9 FORESTS
JI Forests
PD MAR
PY 2023
VL 14
IS 3
AR 573
DI 10.3390/f14030573
PG 19
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA C1WN1
UT WOS:000959904200001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Herzog, K
   Schwander, F
   Schneider, N
   Töpfer, R
AF Herzog, Katja
   Schwander, Florian
   Schneider, Nele
   Toepfer, Reinhard
TI Relationship between meteorological data, physical-mechanical
   characteristics of grapes and<i> Botrytis</i> bunch rot
SO VITIS
LA English
DT Article
DE grapevine; Vitis vinifera ssp; vinifera; high-throughput phenotyping;
   grey mold; meteorological conditions; 3D grape bunch architecture;
   phenology; SMPH; veraison; PIWI varieties; training system
ID ARCHITECTURE; CHARDONNAY; RESISTANCE; REMOVAL; TRAIT
AB Botrytis bunch rot (BBR) is the economically third most im-portant disease in cool climate viticulture. In order to avoid or delay spreading of BBR infections until the grapes reach phys-iological ripeness, different management strategies like early defoliation or specific fungicide applications were developed. The scope of most grapevine breeding programs is the selec-tion of mildew fungus-resistant, climatic adapted grapevines with balanced, healthy yield and outstanding wine quality. Within the long-term breeding process, the application of marker-assisted selection (MAS) is the most efficient way for early selection of desired grapevine seedlings. Since no resist-ances have yet been described for BBR, grapevines shall be selected for developing fruits with physical-mechanical barri-ers reducing the risk for BBR infection like loose grape bunch architecture and thick, impermeable berry cuticle.In the present study first results regarding the investigation of the relationship between physical-mechanical fruit traits (bunch architecture, berry impedance and berry texture), me-teorological data and the degree of BBR infection are shown. Varieties and elite breeding lines were phenotyped using high-throughput, objective sensors in 2021 and 2022, two years with contrasting growing conditions (Siebeldingen, Ger-many). In comparison to 2021, 2022 was characterized by a higher temperature sum D (+196(degrees)days between veraison and harvest) and huge differences in the precipitation sum (PS;-62 mm up to + 105 mm). In order to categorize BBR resist-ance/susceptibility, berries from different genotypes showing high variability in their berry characteristics were sampled at maturity and were tested under controlled lab conditions for BBR susceptibility. For some varieties, it could be shown that meteorological conditions affect both, berry traits as well as infection with BBR. In addition to the environment and the training system, physical-mechanical berry traits and the mean berry diameter could be confirmed as prom-ising phenotypic traits for the prediction of BBR resistance. In summary, the consideration of sensor-based physical -me-chanical berry traits enables an improved risk prediction for BBR, which is of outstanding importance for the evaluation of breeding material and new varieties growing under different environmental conditions, as well as for phenotyping of map-ping populations for QTL analyses and the development of molecular markers. As meteorological conditions were con-trasting in 2021 and 2022 and varieties with high phenotypic variability were considered, additional years of investigations are recommended in order to verify the reliability of the de-tected relationships.
C1 [Herzog, Katja; Schwander, Florian; Schneider, Nele; Toepfer, Reinhard] Julius Kuhn Inst, Inst Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof, D-76833 Siebeldingen, Germany.
C3 Julius Kuhn-Institut
RP Herzog, K (corresponding author), Julius Kuhn Inst, Inst Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof, D-76833 Siebeldingen, Germany.
EM katja.herzog@julius-kuehn.de; florian.schwander@julius-kuehn.de;
   nele.schneider@julius-kuehn.de; reinhard.toepfer@julius-kuehn.de
RI Schwander, Florian/D-3057-2013
FU German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [Bundesministerium fur
   Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) , Bonn, Germany] [ViSys: FKZ 031A349E]
FX The authors thank Moritz Cappel, Ulrike Braun, Claudia Vogel and Teresa
   Claus for their excellent technical support during FTIR analysis.
   Further, we would like to thank Patrick Roemer, Madelaine Stoll and
   Hannes Engler for grape sampling and the conduction of the 3D grape
   scan, and Shuta Kurokawa and Muhammad Idrees Khan supporting the
   measurement of berry texture and berry impedance. We also gratefully
   acknowledge Nagarjun Malagol, providing his expertise in statistical
   anlysis using R. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge the German Federal
   Ministry of Education and Research [Bundesministerium fur Bildung und
   Forschung (BMBF) , Bonn, Germany (No ViSys: FKZ 031A349E) ] , for the
   funding of the SMPH experiments.
CR Bahr C, 2021, IN SILICO PLANTS, V3, DOI 10.1093/insilicoplants/diab027
   Becker T, 2012, VITIS, V51, P141
   BROOME JC, 1995, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V85, P97, DOI 10.1094/Phyto-85-97
   Carreño I, 2015, TREE GENET GENOMES, V11, DOI 10.1007/s11295-014-0818-x
   Cubero S, 2015, AUST J GRAPE WINE R, V21, P101, DOI 10.1111/ajgw.12118
   Deytieux-Belleau C, 2009, EUR J PLANT PATHOL, V125, P551, DOI 10.1007/s10658-009-9503-6
   Dimopoulos N, 2020, J EXP BOT, V71, P3126, DOI 10.1093/jxb/eraa046
   Gabler FM, 2003, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V93, P1263, DOI 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.10.1263
   González-Fernández E, 2020, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V158, P88, DOI 10.1017/S0021859620000362
   GUBLER WD, 1987, PLANT DIS, V71, P599, DOI 10.1094/PD-71-0599
   Harrell Jr F.E., 2020, R Package 'Hmisc'
   Herzog K, 2022, FRONT PLANT SCI, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2021.808365
   Herzog K, 2015, SENSORS-BASEL, V15, P12498, DOI 10.3390/s150612498
   Khanal BP, 2021, PLANT BIOLOGY, V23, P74, DOI 10.1111/plb.13178
   Kicherer A, 2015, ACTA HORTIC, V1082, P335, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1082.46
   Kraus C, 2018, VITIS, V57, P53, DOI 10.5073/vitis.2018.57.53-60
   Le S, 2008, J STAT SOFTW, V25, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v025.i01
   Lorenz D. H., 1995, Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, V1, P100, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0238.1995.tb00085.x
   Medeiros CD, 2017, S AFR J BOT, V111, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.sajb.2017.03.033
   Molitor D, 2020, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V64, P1571, DOI 10.1007/s00484-020-01938-5
   Molitor D, 2019, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/agronomy9040173
   Mosedale JR, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P3814, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13406
   Mundy DC, 2022, PLANTS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/plants11213004
   Nendel C, 2010, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V54, P231, DOI 10.1007/s00484-009-0274-8
   Palacios F, 2019, SENSORS-BASEL, V19, DOI 10.3390/s19173799
   Poni S, 2006, AM J ENOL VITICULT, V57, P397
   Porro D, 2010, ACTA HORTIC, V868, P73, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.868.5
   Richter R, 2019, THEOR APPL GENET, V132, P1159, DOI 10.1007/s00122-018-3269-1
   Rist F, 2022, HORTICULTURAE, V8, DOI 10.3390/horticulturae8100907
   Rist F, 2018, SENSORS-BASEL, V18, DOI 10.3390/s18030763
   Schäfer J, 2021, APPL SCI-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/app11083304
   Schmidt D, 2019, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/agronomy9080426
   Intrigliolo DS, 2008, AM J ENOL VITICULT, V59, P30
   Signorell A., 2021, Package DescTools: Tools for Descriptive Statistics
   Tello J, 2018, AUST J GRAPE WINE R, V24, P6, DOI 10.1111/ajgw.12310
   Töpfer R, 2022, THEOR APPL GENET, V135, P3947, DOI 10.1007/s00122-022-04077-0
   Underhill A, 2020, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V145, P363, DOI 10.21273/JASHS04932-20
   Vail ME, 1998, PLANT DIS, V82, P107, DOI 10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.1.107
   VanderWeide J, 2022, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V202, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.105036
   Watt AM, 2008, AUST J GRAPE WINE R, V14, P46, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2008.00006.x
   Würz DA, 2020, CROP PROT, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105079
NR 41
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 3
PU Julius Kuhn Inst - JKI
PI Quedlinburg
PA Erwin-Baur-Str. 27, Quedlinburg, GERMANY
SN 0042-7500
J9 VITIS
JI Vitis
PY 2023
VL 62
SI SI
BP 56
EP 66
DI 10.5073/vitis.2023.62.special-issue.56-66
PG 11
WC Horticulture
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA FD5T4
UT WOS:001143842600011
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Seddon, N
   Daniels, E
   Davis, R
   Chausson, A
   Harris, R
   Hou-Jones, X
   Huq, S
   Kapos, V
   Mace, GM
   Rizvi, AR
   Reid, H
   Roe, D
   Turner, B
   Wicander, S
AF Seddon, Nathalie
   Daniels, Elizabeth
   Davis, Rowan
   Chausson, Alexandre
   Harris, Rian
   Hou-Jones, Xiaoting
   Huq, Saleemul
   Kapos, Valerie
   Mace, Georgina M.
   Rizvi, Ali Raza
   Reid, Hannah
   Roe, Dilys
   Turner, Beth
   Wicander, Sylvia
TI Global recognition of the importance of nature-based solutions to the
   impacts of climate change
SO GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; ecosystem-based adaptation; Nationally Determined
   Contributions; policy
ID ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; STREAMFLOW RESPONSE; BIODIVERSITY; FOREST; CHINA;
   AFFORESTATION; AGROFORESTRY; RESTORATION; ADAPTATION; DEFENSE
AB Non-technical summary
   Ecosystems across the globe are vulnerable to the effects of climate change, as are the communities that depend on them. However, ecosystems can also protect people from climate change impacts. As the evidence base strengthens, nature-based solutions (NbS) are increasingly prominent in climate change policy, especially in developing nations. Yet intentions rarely translate into measurable, evidence-based targets. As Paris Agreement signatories revise their Nationally Determined Contributions, we argue that NbS are key to meeting global goals for climate and biodiversity, and we urge researchers to work more closely with policy-makers to identify targets that benefit both people and ecosystems.
   Technical summary
   Recent research demonstrates that nature-based solutions (NbS) can help protect communities and infrastructure from the impacts of climate change while providing a range of other benefits for society. As nations revise or prepare new Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) in support of the Paris Agreement, there is a major opportunity to increase global ambition on NbS. To support this process and to provide a baseline against which ambition for NbS can be tracked, here we report on the prominence of NbS in the 168 NDCs that were submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. In total, 104 nations include NbS in the adaptation component of their NDCs, 77 nations include them in both their adaptation and mitigation components and an additional 27 include them as part of their mitigation plans only. In other words, 131 nations - or 66% of all signatories to the Paris Agreement - have articulated intentions of working with ecosystems, in one form or another. However, national intentions to deliver NbS for adaptation vary by level of economic development, region and habitat type, and rarely translate into measurable evidence-based targets. We discuss possible reasons for these findings and provide recommendations on how national governments, practitioners and researchers can together enhance ambition for NbS to climate change impacts. As climate pledges are revised during successive global 'stock takes' of the Paris Agreement, we urge the research community to work closely with practitioners and policy-makers to identify meaningful targets that benefit both people and the ecosystems on which they depend.
   Social media summary
   Ecosystems can help us adapt to climatic impacts but robust policy targets that benefit people and nature are needed.
C1 [Seddon, Nathalie; Chausson, Alexandre; Turner, Beth] Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Nat Based Solut Initiat, Oxford OX1 3PS, England.
   [Daniels, Elizabeth] Stockholm Environm Inst, 29 Grove St, Oxford OX2 7JT, England.
   [Davis, Rowan] Univ Sussex, Inst Dev Studies, Sci Policy Res Unit, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England.
   [Harris, Rian] Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Wildlife Conservat Res Unit, Tubney House, Oxford OX13 5QL, England.
   [Hou-Jones, Xiaoting; Reid, Hannah; Roe, Dilys] Int Inst Environm & Dev, Grays Inn Rd, London WC1X 8NH, England.
   [Huq, Saleemul] Int Ctr Climate Change & Dev, House 27,Rd 1,Block A, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.
   [Kapos, Valerie; Wicander, Sylvia] World Conservat Monitoring Ctr, 2019 Huntingdon Rd, Cambridge CB3 0DL, England.
   [Mace, Georgina M.] UCL, Ctr Biodivers & Environm Res, London, England.
   [Rizvi, Ali Raza] Int Union Conservat Nat, 1630 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC 20009 USA.
C3 University of Oxford; University of Sussex; University of Oxford;
   University of London; University College London
RP Seddon, N (corresponding author), Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Nat Based Solut Initiat, Oxford OX1 3PS, England.
EM nathalie.seddon@zoo.ox.ac.uk
RI Mace, Georgina/I-3072-2016
OI Chausson, Alexandre/0000-0001-9337-3970; Seddon,
   Nathalie/0000-0002-1880-6104
FU Natural Environmental Research Council Knowledge Exchange Fellowship;
   University of Oxford (John Fell Fund, Department of Zoology and Wadham
   College); German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature
   Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU); NERC [NE/R002649/1] Funding
   Source: UKRI
FX This study was supported by a Natural Environmental Research Council
   Knowledge Exchange Fellowship to N. Seddon, with additional funding from
   the University of Oxford (John Fell Fund, Department of Zoology and
   Wadham College). The study also formed part of the International Climate
   Initiative (IKI) project `Ecosystem-Based Adaptation: Strengthening the
   Evidence and Informing Policy', coordinated by the International
   Institute for Environment and Development, the International Union for
   Conservation of Nature and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre of
   the United Nations Environment Programme. The German Federal Ministry
   for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU)
   supports the IKI on the basis of a decision adopted by the German
   Bundestag.
CR Allen CD, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P660, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001
   [Anonymous], 2009, TECHN SER
   Bongaarts J, 2019, POPUL DEV REV, V45, P680, DOI 10.1111/padr.12283
   Bowler DE, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V97, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
   Brancalion PHS, 2017, RESTOR ECOL, V25, P491, DOI 10.1111/rec.12519
   Brink E, 2018, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V28, P82, DOI 10.1002/eet.1795
   Browder Greg., 2019, Integrating Green and Gray: Creating Next Generation Infrastructure
   Brown DR, 2011, ENVIRON MANAGE, V48, P322, DOI 10.1007/s00267-010-9590-3
   Buttle JM, 2011, HYDROL PROCESS, V25, P3030, DOI 10.1002/hyp.8061
   Calliari E, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V656, P691, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.341
   Cao SX, 2008, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V42, P1826, DOI 10.1021/es0870597
   Cao SX, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V183, P843, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.096
   Cao SX, 2009, J APPL ECOL, V46, P536, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01605.x
   Crouzeilles R, 2020, CONSERV LETT, V13, DOI 10.1111/conl.12709
   Dadson SJ, 2017, P ROY SOC A-MATH PHY, V473, DOI 10.1098/rspa.2016.0706
   Dave R, 2019, NATURE, V570, P164, DOI 10.1038/d41586-019-01817-z
   Enríquez-de-Salamanca A, 2017, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V64, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.03.005
   Forsell N, 2016, CARBON BAL MANAGE, V11, DOI 10.1186/s13021-016-0068-3
   Frank D, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P2861, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12916
   Global Commission on Adaptation, 2019, AD NOW GLOB CALL LEA
   Grassi G, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P220, DOI [10.1038/nclimate3227, 10.1038/NCLIMATE3227]
   Griscom BW, 2020, PHILOS T R SOC B, V375, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2019.0126
   Hobbie SE, 2020, PHILOS T R SOC B, V375, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2019.0124
   Hua FY, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms12717
   Huang L, 2012, ECOL ENG, V44, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.03.007
   Hutchison C, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-33670-x
   IPCC, 2019, CLIM LAND IPCC SPEC
   IPCC, 2018, GLOB WARM 1 5C SUMM
   Jactel H, 2017, CURR FOR REP, V3, P223, DOI 10.1007/s40725-017-0064-1
   Jia XX, 2017, J HYDROL, V546, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.011
   Jiao JY, 2012, RESTOR ECOL, V20, P240, DOI 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00756.x
   Kabisch N, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08373-210239
   Kelly CN, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P3727, DOI 10.1002/2016GL068058
   Lavorel S, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V92, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.010
   Lewis SL, 2019, NATURE, V568, P25, DOI 10.1038/d41586-019-01026-8
   Liquete C, 2016, ECOSYST SERV, V22, P392, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.011
   Liu JG, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P9477, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0706436105
   Loreau M, 2008, AM NAT, V172, pE48, DOI 10.1086/589746
   Mace G., 2014, ROYAL SOC SCI POLICY
   Martin TG, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P122, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2918
   Maxwell SL, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aax2546
   Mbow C, 2014, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V6, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.014
   McGuire JL, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P7195, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1602817113
   Menéndez P, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-61136-6
   Mijangos JL, 2015, MOL ECOL, V24, P22, DOI 10.1111/mec.12995
   Morecroft MD, 2019, SCIENCE, V366, P1329, DOI 10.1126/science.aaw9256
   Nalau J, 2018, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V10, P851, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0032.1
   Narayan S, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-09269-z
   Narayan S, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0154735
   Natl Acad Sci Engn Med, 2016, ATTRIBUTION OF EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS IN THE CONTEXT OF CLIMATE CHANGE, P1, DOI 10.17226/21852
   Nature4Climate, SUMM ANN UN CLIM SUM
   NBSPP, 2020, NATURE BASED SOLUTIO
   Oliver TH, 2015, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V30, P673, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.009
   Ostrom E, 2009, SCIENCE, V325, P419, DOI 10.1126/science.1172133
   Osuri AM, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab5f75
   Ouyang Z, 2016, SCIENCE, V352, P1455, DOI 10.1126/science.aaf2295
   Paul C, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V587, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.037
   Reid H., 2019, Is ecosystem-based adaptation effective? Perceptions and Lessons Learned from 13 Project Sites
   Rizvi A., 2014, NATURE BASED SOLUTIO
   Rupp-Armstrong S, 2007, J COASTAL RES, V23, P1418, DOI 10.2112/04-0426.1
   Scherr S. J., 2009, SUSTAINABLE LAND MAN
   Scyphers SB, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0022396
   Seddon N., 2019, Nature-Based Solutions in Nationally Determined Contributions: Synthesis and Recommendations for Enhancing Climate Ambition and Action by 2020
   Seddon N, 2020, PHILOS T R SOC B, V375, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2019.0120
   Seddon N, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P84, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0405-0
   Temmerman S, 2013, NATURE, V504, P79, DOI 10.1038/nature12859
   Torralba M, 2016, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V230, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.002
   UNFCCC, 2016, PAR AGR UN FRAM CONV
   Uy N, 2012, COMM ENV DISAST RISK, V9, P131, DOI 10.1108/S2040-7262(2012)0000009014
   Veldman JW, 2015, BIOSCIENCE, V65, P1011, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biv118
   Vermaat JE, 2016, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V769, P121, DOI 10.1007/s10750-015-2482-z
   Waldron A, 2017, TROP CONSERV SCI, V10, DOI 10.1177/1940082917720667
   Watson JEM, 2018, NAT ECOL EVOL, V2, P599, DOI 10.1038/s41559-018-0490-x
   World Economic Forum, 2020, The global risks report 2020
   Woroniecki S, 2019, ECOL SOC, V24, DOI 10.5751/ES-10854-240204
   Woroniecki S, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030772
   Xu JC, 2011, NATURE, V477, P370, DOI 10.1038/477371a
   Zhang JZ, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V63, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.008
NR 78
TC 101
Z9 110
U1 5
U2 34
PU CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
PI CAMBRIDGE
PA EDINBURGH BLDG, SHAFTESBURY RD, CB2 8RU CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND
EI 2059-4798
J9 GLOB SUSTAIN
JI Glob. Sustain.
PY 2020
VL 3
AR e15
DI 10.1017/sus.2020.8
PG 12
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA VK9OJ
UT WOS:000769813600015
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sudo, K
   Maehara, S
   Nakaoka, M
   Fujii, M
AF Sudo, Kenji
   Maehara, Serina
   Nakaoka, Masahiro
   Fujii, Masahiko
TI Predicting Future Shifts in the Distribution of Tropicalization
   Indicator Fish that Affect Coastal Ecosystem Services of Japan
SO FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; Northwest Pacific; species distribution model;
   mitigation and adaptation; climate model
ID SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; OCEAN ACIDIFICATION;
   SIGANUS-FUSCESCENS; KYPHOSUS-BIGIBBUS; MARINE; TEMPERATURE; PERFORMANCE;
   ASSEMBLAGE; HERBIVORY
AB Tropicalization characterized by an increase in marine species originating from the tropical waters affects human society in various ways. An increase in toxic harmful species negatively affects fisheries and leisure use, and an increase in herbivorous fish affects fisheries and carbon sink capacity by decreasing seagrass/seaweed beds. On the other hand, an increase in tropical reef fish attracts more tourism. This study aimed to predict future shifts in the distribution of functional groups of tropicalization indicator fish that can affect marine ecosystem services in temperate coastal waters of Japan. We estimated the distribution of harmful fish Aluterus scriptus and Scarus ovifrons, herbivorous fish Kyphosus bigibbus and Siganus fuscescens, and tropical reef fish Amphiprion frenatus and Chaetodon auriga by collecting their distribution data from open databases. Distributions in 2000-2018 and the future (2046-2055 and 2091-2100) under different climate change scenarios (the representative concentration pathways; RCPs) were estimated using a species distribution model. We used environmental variables such as minimum sea surface temperature (SST), depth, slope, coral reef area, and seagrass/seaweed bed area as predictors and carried out future predictions using the future ocean regional projection (FORP) dataset. The minimum SST was the factor most responsible for the estimated distribution patterns for all species. The depth, slope, and seagrass/seaweed bed were also important for some species. The estimated probability of occurrence was high along the Pacific coast, which was affected by the warm Kuroshio Current and Tsushima Current along the coast of the Sea of Japan. Projected shifts in distributions based on different RCP scenarios showed that these indicator species would significantly increase their distribution in the middle to northern parts of Japan (32-37 degrees N). By the 2090s, their habitat range was estimated to increase to 1.2-1.9 times that of 2000-2018 with severe warming (RCP8.5). However, the target species habitat range would not change significantly with stringent mitigation (RCP2.6). Our results suggest that ambitious commitment to reducing CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions, such as following the Paris Agreement, will alleviate future tropicalization. Moreover, the fine resolution results can also be directly used for planning climate adaptation programs for local decision makers.
C1 [Sudo, Kenji; Nakaoka, Masahiro] Hokkaido Univ, Field Sci Ctr Northern Biosphere, Akkeshi Marine Stn, Akkeshi, Japan.
   [Maehara, Serina; Fujii, Masahiko] Hokkaido Univ, Grad Sch Environm Sci, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
   [Fujii, Masahiko] Hokkaido Univ, Fac Environm Earth Sci, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
C3 Hokkaido University; Hokkaido University; Hokkaido University
RP Sudo, K (corresponding author), Hokkaido Univ, Field Sci Ctr Northern Biosphere, Akkeshi Marine Stn, Akkeshi, Japan.
EM ksudo.hokudai@gmail.com
RI Nakaoka, Masahiro/I-9237-2019
FU Integrated Research Program for Advancing Climate Models (TOUGOU) from
   the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology
   (MEXT), Japan [JPMXD0717935498]; Japan Society for the Promotion of
   Science (JSPS) KAKENHI by Environmental Restoration and Conservation
   Agency, Japan [JP 16H01792]; Hokkaido University Functional Enhancement
   Project; Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council,
   Development of Blue Carbon Evaluation Method and Efficient
   Seaweed/Seagrass Bed Formation and Expansion Technology [JPJ008722];
   Japan Agency for Marine-Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) under the
   "SI-CAT" project of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
   and Technology, Japan [JPMXD0715667163]
FX This study was supported by the Integrated Research Program for
   Advancing Climate Models (TOUGOU) Grant Number JPMXD0717935498 from the
   Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT),
   Japan; The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI
   Grant Number JP 16H01792: Environment Research and Technology
   Development Funds by Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency,
   Japan (S-15: Predicting and Assessing Natural Capital and Ecosystem
   Services); Hokkaido University Functional Enhancement Project;
   Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council, Development of
   Blue Carbon Evaluation Method and Efficient Seaweed/Seagrass Bed
   Formation and Expansion Technology (JPJ008722). This study utilized the
   dataset "Future Ocean Regional Projection" (FORP), which was produced by
   the Japan Agency for Marine-Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) under the
   "SI-CAT" project (Grant Number: JPMXD0715667163) of the Ministry of
   Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
CR Abe H, 2021, REG STUD MAR SCI, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101968
   Aguirre-Gutiérrez J, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0063708
   Angilletta MJ, 2006, PHYSIOL BIOCHEM ZOOL, V79, P282, DOI 10.1086/499990
   [Anonymous], 2010, Marine Biodiversity Records, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1755267210000369
   Architects Regional Planners and Associates Hiroshima University Japan Weather Association, 2019, REP LOC CLIM CHANG A
   Bartier PM, 1996, COMPUT GEOSCI, V22, P795, DOI 10.1016/0098-3004(96)00021-0
   Beaugrand G, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P695, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2650, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2650]
   Biodiversity Center of Japan, 2015, MON SIT 1000 COR REE
   Booth DJ, 2011, MAR FRESHWATER RES, V62, P1027, DOI 10.1071/MF10270
   Boria RA, 2014, ECOL MODEL, V275, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.012
   Costa B, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0085555
   Elith J, 2006, ECOGRAPHY, V29, P129, DOI 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
   Elith J, 2011, DIVERS DISTRIB, V17, P43, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
   Escalante Tania, 2013, TIP, V16, P05
   Fielding AH, 1997, ENVIRON CONSERV, V24, P38, DOI 10.1017/S0376892997000088
   Fish Image Database, 2021, FISHPIX
   Fisheries Agency Japan, 2021, GUID LIN COUNT ROCK, V3th
   Fourcade Y, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0097122
   Fujii M, 2021, FRONT MAR SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2021.590020
   Garcia Molinos Jorge, 2016, Nature Climate Change, V6, P83, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2769
   GBIF.org, 2022, GBIF HOM PAG
   Gomi K, 2021, J FISH BIOL, V99, P131, DOI 10.1111/jfb.14704
   Graham CH, 2008, J APPL ECOL, V45, P239, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01408.x
   Harley CDG, 2006, ECOL LETT, V9, P228, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00871.x
   Hattori Akihisa, 2011, Galaxea - Tokyo, V13, P1
   Hijmans RJ, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P2272, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01256.x
   HOUDE ED, 1989, FISH B-NOAA, V87, P471
   IPCC, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007, DOI DOI 10.1017/CB09781107415324
   ISHIHAMA F, 2017, HOZEN SEITAIGAKU KEN, V22, P21
   Kadota T, 2017, NIPPON SUISAN GAKK, V83, P74, DOI 10.2331/suisan.16-00035
   Kamimura Y., 2009, Aquaculture Science, DOI DOI 10.11233/AQUACULTURESCI.57.233
   Kuiter R.H., 2001, Pictoral guide to Indonesian reef fishes. Part 3 Jawfishes - Sunfishes, Opistognathidae - Molidae, P623
   Kumagai NH, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P8990, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1716826115
   Kuwahara Hisami, 2006, Global Environmental Research, V10, P189
   Lenanton RCJ, 2017, REG STUD MAR SCI, V13, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.rsma.2017.03.005
   Leriorato JC, 2021, MAR BIOL, V168, DOI 10.1007/s00227-021-03875-2
   Liu Y, 2013, ICES J MAR SCI, V70, P1460, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fst108
   Luiz OJ, 2008, ZOOTAXA, P1
   Mantua NJ, 2002, J OCEANOGR, V58, P35, DOI 10.1023/A:1015820616384
   Marine Planning, 2001, DIV PAR JAP MONTHL D, P272
   Marsland S, 2009, CH CRC MACH LEARN PA, P1
   Merow C, 2013, ECOGRAPHY, V36, P1058, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x
   Morim J, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P711, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0542-5
   Moss RH, 2010, NATURE, V463, P747, DOI 10.1038/nature08823
   Motomura H., 2020, CURRENT STANDARD JAP, P560
   Munday PL, 2012, J EXP BIOL, V215, P3865, DOI 10.1242/jeb.074765
   Nakamura Y, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0081107
   Nakazono A, 2002, FISHERIES SCI, V68, P127, DOI 10.2331/fishsci.68.sup1_127
   Nishikawa S, 2021, PROG EARTH PLANET SC, V8, DOI 10.1186/s40645-020-00399-z
   Nishimura S, 1981, SEA LIFE EARTH INTRO
   Noda Mikio, 2016, Journal of National Fisheries University, V64, P219
   Noda M, 2011, NIPPON SUISAN GAKK, V77, P1008, DOI 10.2331/suisan.77.1008
   O'Connor MI, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P1266, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0603422104
   Oppenheimer M., IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, DOI [10.1017/9781009157964.006, DOI 10.1017/9781009157964.006, DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.AAM6284]
   Orr JC, 2005, NATURE, V437, P681, DOI 10.1038/nature04095
   Payne NL, 2016, FUNCT ECOL, V30, P903, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12618
   Phillips SJ, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V190, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
   Pittman SJ, 2007, ECOL MODEL, V204, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.017
   Poloczanska ES, 2016, FRONT MAR SCI, V3, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2016.00062
   Poloczanska ES, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P919, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1958, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1958]
   Raes N, 2007, ECOGRAPHY, V30, P727, DOI 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05041.x
   Randin CF, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P1557, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01766.x
   Ready J, 2010, ECOL MODEL, V221, P467, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.10.025
   Sato M, 2021, POPUL ECOL, V63, P75, DOI 10.1002/1438-390X.12061
   Shimizu N., 2009, SCI MUSEUM NET
   Steneck RS, 2017, CURR BIOL, V27, pR484, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.021
   Sudo K, 2020, ECOL RES, V35, P47, DOI 10.1111/1440-1703.12053
   SWETS JA, 1988, SCIENCE, V240, P1285, DOI 10.1126/science.3287615
   Takao S, 2015, ECOL EVOL, V5, P213, DOI 10.1002/ece3.1358
   Tanaka K, 2012, ECOL EVOL, V2, P2854, DOI 10.1002/ece3.391
   Tanase H., 1992, ANN REPORT SETO MARI, V5, P49
   Taniyama S, 2003, TOXICON, V42, P29, DOI 10.1016/S0041-0101(03)00097-7
   Taylor KE, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P485, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
   Tebaldi C, 2007, PHILOS T R SOC A, V365, P2053, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2007.2076
   Tsuchida S., 2018, REP MAR ECOL RES I, V23, P69
   Tsujino H, 2017, TECHNICAL REPORTS ME, V80, DOI [DOI 10.11483/MRITECHREPO.80, 10.11483/mritechrepo.80]
   Ueta Y., 2018, TOKUSHIMA B TOKUSHIM, V12, P1
   United Nations Environment Programme, 2020, OUT BLUE VAL SEAGR E
   Vergés A, 2019, FUNCT ECOL, V33, P1000, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13310
   Vergés A, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P13791, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1610725113
   Vergés A, 2014, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V281, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2014.0846
   Warren DL, 2011, ECOL APPL, V21, P335, DOI 10.1890/10-1171.1
   Wenger SJ, 2012, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V3, P260, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00170.x
   Wernberg T, 2016, SCIENCE, V353, P169, DOI 10.1126/science.aad8745
   Wisz MS, 2008, DIVERS DISTRIB, V14, P763, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00482.x
   Woodhead AJ, 2019, FUNCT ECOL, V33, P1023, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13331
   Yamaguchi A, 2006, NIPPON SUISAN GAKK, V72, P1046, DOI 10.2331/suisan.72.1046
   Yara Y, 2012, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V9, P4955, DOI 10.5194/bg-9-4955-2012
   Yara Y, 2011, GALAXEA J CORAL REEF, V13, P11, DOI DOI 10.3755/GALAXEA.13.11
   Young M, 2015, DIVERS DISTRIB, V21, P1428, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12378
NR 90
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 2
U2 17
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2297-3362
J9 FRONT BUILT ENVIRON
JI Front. Built Environ.
PD JAN 5
PY 2022
VL 7
AR 788700
DI 10.3389/fbuil.2021.788700
PG 15
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
GA YL3KX
UT WOS:000745794500001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Zahmatkesh, Z
   Burian, SJ
   Karamouz, M
   Tavakol-Davani, H
   Goharian, E
AF Zahmatkesh, Zahra
   Burian, Steven J.
   Karamouz, Mohammad
   Tavakol-Davani, Hassan
   Goharian, Erfan
TI Low-Impact Development Practices to Mitigate Climate Change Effects on
   Urban Stormwater Runoff: Case Study of New York City
SO JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; Climate adaptation; Change factor; Green infrastructure;
   Urban runoff
ID PERMEABLE PAVEMENT; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; GREEN ROOF; QUALITY;
   PERSPECTIVE; PERFORMANCE; QUANTITY; MODELS
AB Urban stormwater runoff management systems are usually designed to meet performance standards based on historical climate data, which are assumed to be stationary. Based on the evidence from climate change impact studies, in the near future, stormwater management systems, within the built environment, may need to meet performance expectations under climatic conditions different from historical climate. Considering the impacts of climate change on rainfall intensities and stormwater runoff peak flow and volumes, and in turn the effectiveness of mitigation, practices for urban stormwater management are desirable. This paper presents the results of a climate change impact study on urban stormwater runoff in the Bronx River watershed, New York City. Considering the impacts of climate change on watershed runoff, the potential for low-impact development (LID) controls to mitigate the impacts was investigated. Stormwater runoff and LID controls were modeled using the U.S. EPA Storm Water Management Model version 5 (EPA SWMM5). The simulations were driven by historical precipitation modified to represent future projections using a change factor methodology based on precipitation from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). Using the change factor method, historical precipitation was perturbed to obtain future data, based on three climate scenarios projecting maximum, mean, and minimum values for rainfall. Results of frequency analysis performed on the simulated peak flow rates, with different recurrence intervals, showed a noticeable increase in the frequency of occurrence of extreme storm events and their peak values, under future extreme climate conditions. An LID control scenario consisting of rainwater harvesting, porous pavement, and bioretention was designed and evaluated using the SWMM model. The results showed that, while average increase in historical annual runoff volume under climate change impacts was approximately 48%, the LID controls could provide an average reduction of 41% in annual runoff volume. Application of the LID controls also reduced peak flow rates by an average of 8 to 13%. LID implementation decreased watershed runoff corresponding to 2-year and 50-year return periods, by 28 and 14%, respectively. In conclusion, retrofits with LID controls may provide not only their inherent benefits (e.g., runoff volume and water quality), but also additional climate impact mitigation benefits for stormwater runoff. (C) 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
C1 [Zahmatkesh, Zahra] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran.
   [Burian, Steven J.] Univ Utah, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Global Change & Sustainabil Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA.
   [Karamouz, Mohammad] Univ Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
   [Karamouz, Mohammad] NYU Polytech Sch Engn, Dept Civil & Urban Engn, Environm Engn Program, Brooklyn, NY USA.
   [Karamouz, Mohammad] NYU, Polytech Inst, Environm Engn Program, Dept Civil Engn, Brooklyn, NY USA.
   [Tavakol-Davani, Hassan; Goharian, Erfan] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA.
C3 University of Tehran; Utah System of Higher Education; University of
   Utah; University of Tehran; New York University; New York University;
   New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Utah System of Higher
   Education; University of Utah
RP Zahmatkesh, Z (corresponding author), Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA.
EM zhr_zahmatkesh@yahoo.com; burian@eng.utah.edu; mkaramou@poly.edu;
   Hassan.tavakol@utah.edu; erfan.goharian@utah.edu
RI Karamouz, Mohammad/Z-2080-2019
OI Davani, Hassan/0000-0001-5428-4844; Burian, Steven/0000-0003-0523-4968
CR Aad MPA, 2010, J HYDROL ENG, V15, P434, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000136
   Ahiablame LM, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V119, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.019
   Anandhi A, 2011, WATER RESOUR RES, V47, DOI 10.1029/2010WR009104
   [Anonymous], 2007, STORM WATER MANAGEME
   [Anonymous], WEF MANUAL OF PRACTI
   [Anonymous], 1999, PREL DAT SUMM URB ST
   [Anonymous], 2013, CLIM CHANG 2013 5 AS
   [Anonymous], 2009, Global climate change impacts in the Unites States
   [Anonymous], URB STORMW MAN US
   Arnold CL, 1996, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V62, P243, DOI 10.1080/01944369608975688
   Bedan ES, 2009, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V45, P998, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00342.x
   Benedict M., 2006, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
   Berndtsson JC, 2010, ECOL ENG, V36, P351, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.12.014
   Blaney H. F., 1962, Technical Bulletin. United States Department of Agriculture, No. 1275
   Bloomberg M.R., 2012, NYC Green Infrastructure Plan : 2012 Green Infrastructure Pilot Monitoring Report
   Brabec EA, 2009, J HYDROL ENG, V14, P425, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(425)
   Burian S.J., 2010, URBAN ECOSYSTEMS ECO
   Carter T, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V80, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.005
   Center for Watershed Protection, 2006, BRONX RIV WAT BAS AS
   Center for Watershed Protection and Biohabitats, 2007, BRONX RIV WAT ASS MA
   Coffman L. S., 2002, Handbook of water sensitive planning and design, P97
   Collins KA, 2008, J HYDROL ENG, V13, P1146, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:12(1146)
   Damodaram C, 2010, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V46, P907, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00462.x
   Darch GJC, 2012, P I CIVIL ENG-WAT M, V165, P553, DOI 10.1680/wama.12.00024
   Davis A, 2005, HUDSON REV, V58, P344
   Davis AP, 2012, J HYDROL ENG, V17, P604, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000467
   Davis AP, 2009, J ENVIRON ENG, V135, P109, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2009)135:3(109)
   Dessai S., 2007, UNCERTAINTY CLIMATE
   Dietz ME, 2005, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V167, P123, DOI 10.1007/s11270-005-8266-8
   Dietz ME, 2008, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V87, P560, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.026
   Dietz ME, 2007, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V186, P351, DOI 10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z
   Elliott AH, 2007, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V22, P394, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.005
   EPA, 2000, EPA841B00E005
   EPA, 2011, SMART GROWTH
   Fach S, 2005, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V51, P37, DOI 10.2166/wst.2005.0030
   Fassman EA, 2010, J HYDROL ENG, V15, P475, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000238
   Gardner MW, 2000, ATMOS ENVIRON, V34, P21, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00359-3
   Gill SE, 2007, Built Environ, V33, P115, DOI [10.2148/benv.33.1.115, DOI 10.2148/BENV.33.1.115]
   Gregoire BG, 2011, ECOL ENG, V37, P963, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.02.004
   GRINGORTEN II, 1963, J GEOPHYS RES, V68, P813, DOI 10.1029/JZ068i003p00813
   Hallegatte S, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.12.003
   Hinman C., 2009, 04DEC11SG WAT ENV RE
   Hunt WF, 2006, J IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V132, P600, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:6(600)
   Hurley SE, 2011, ECOL ENG, V37, P850, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.01.008
   Jennings DB, 2002, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V17, P471, DOI 10.1023/A:1021211114125
   Jia HF, 2012, SEP PURIF TECHNOL, V84, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.04.026
   Karamouz M, 2013, EARTH INTERACT, V17, DOI 10.1175/2012EI000503.1
   Karamouz M, 2013, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V139, P349, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000263
   Karamouz M, 2011, J HYDROL ENG, V16, P395, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000317
   Karamouz M, 2010, J IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V136, P847, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000261
   Karl T. R., 2009, Global climate change impacts in the United States
   Kay AL, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V114, P211, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0395-z
   KUO CY, 1988, WATER RESOUR BULL, V24, P125
   LeFevre NJB, 2010, J IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V136, P333, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000177
   Leopold L.B., 1968, Geological Survey Circular, P554, DOI DOI 10.3133/CIR554
   Lucas W, 2008, LOW IMP DEV C SEATTL
   Milly PCD, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P573, DOI 10.1126/science.1151915
   Myers B, 2011, P I CIVIL ENG-WAT M, V164, P361, DOI 10.1680/wama.2011.164.7.361
   Pingale SM, 2014, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V83, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.10.006
   Prince George's County Maryland (PGCo), 1999, LOW IMP DEV DES MAN
   Prince George's County Maryland (PGCo), 1999, LOW IMPACT DEV HYDR
   Prudhomme C, 2010, J HYDROL, V390, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.043
   Pyke C, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V103, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.006
   Racoviceanu AI, 2010, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V16, P40, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2010)16:1(40)
   Roebuck R. M., 2007, THESIS U BRADFORD W
   Rowe DB, 2011, ENVIRON POLLUT, V159, P2100, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.029
   Roy-Poirier A, 2010, J ENVIRON ENG, V136, P878, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000227
   Scholz A., 2011, THESIS U NEW HAMPSHI
   Scholz M, 2007, BUILD ENVIRON, V42, P3830, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.016
   Schueler T.R., 1994, Watershed protection techniques, V1, P100
   Shaw R. K., 2007, BRONX RIVER WATERSHE
   Shongwe ME, 2011, J CLIMATE, V24, P3718, DOI 10.1175/2010JCLI2883.1
   Shuster W. D., 2005, Urban Water J, V2, P263, DOI [DOI 10.1080/15730620500386529, 10.1080/15730620500386529]
   Sieker H, 1998, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V38, P91, DOI 10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00737-9
   Simonovic Slobodan P., 2009, Updated rainfall intensity duration frequency curves for the City of London under the changing climate
   Spatari S, 2011, ENVIRON POLLUT, V159, P2174, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.015
   Steffen J, 2013, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V49, P810, DOI 10.1111/jawr.12038
   Stokes J, 2006, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V11, P335, DOI 10.1065/lca2005.06.214
   Stokes J, 2011, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V17, P15, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000036
   Sutherland R.C., 1995, Watershed Protection Techniques, V2, P282
   Trenberth KE, 2011, CLIM RES, V47, P123, DOI 10.3354/cr00953
   U.S. Army Corps of Engineers New York District (USACE NYD), 2010, ENV ASS
   U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2003, PRACT LOW IMP DEV
   Walsh CJ, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0045814
   Walsh T. C., 2013, 41 ANN WAT RES C UT
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   Westchester County Department of Planning, 2013, BRONX RIV WAT COAL
   Willems P, 2012, ATMOS RES, V103, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.04.003
   Zimmerman M. J., 2010, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, P40
NR 89
TC 169
Z9 207
U1 7
U2 492
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 0733-9437
EI 1943-4774
J9 J IRRIG DRAIN ENG
JI J. Irrig. Drainage Eng-ASCE
PD JAN
PY 2015
VL 141
IS 1
AR 04014043
DI 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000770
PG 13
WC Agricultural Engineering; Engineering, Civil; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Engineering; Water Resources
GA AW6CY
UT WOS:000346358200005
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Pappalardo, SE
   Zanetti, C
   Todeschi, V
AF Pappalardo, Salvatore Eugenio
   Zanetti, Carlo
   Todeschi, Valeria
TI Mapping urban heat islands and heat-related risk during heat waves from
   a climate justice perspective: A case study in the municipality of Padua
   (Italy) for inclusive adaptation policies
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate Justice; Urban heat islands; Heat waves; Inclusive climate
   adaptation policies; Urban resilience; Italy
ID MORTALITY; VULNERABILITY; POPULATION; IMPACTS; SUMMER; EUROPE; HEALTH;
   DEATH; GREEN; AREA
AB Climate change has led to a dramatic increase in extreme events worldwide. Predictions for a + 1.5 degrees C world indicate that 13.8% of the global population will be exposed to heat waves (HWs), a proportion rising to 36.9% in a + 2 degrees C scenario. At present, about 9.6 M people in the EU and UK are exposed to extreme heat every year. Overheating has various impacts on cities, including urban infrastructure failures and changes in ecological processes. However, scarce attention is currently paid to the distribution of HWs impacts and the differential vulnerabilities of different social groups, raising the issue of climate justice in cities. HWs directly impact the health of the most vulnerable social groups resulting in an increase in mortality and morbidity rates. This research focuses on the city of Padua (Italy) as a pilot study to assess the effects of urban HWs and heat islands (UHI) combined. By framing the unequal spatial distribution of socially vulnerable groups, this study aims to i) provide a replicable spatially explicit open-access methodology to assess the heat-related risk of UHI; ii) propose the first climate justice heat-related risk index to be adopted in inclusive and just adaptation plans. Specifically, it aims to i) identify HWs and map critical hotspots during summer 2022 at suburban scale; ii) assess the spatial correlations among impervious areas and UHI; iii) map the climate risk to vulnerable social groups; and iv) propose a global climate justice risk index for all the vulnerable groups considered. Images from Landsat 8-9 were processed, and territorial data were acquired from public databases. It was found that three extreme HWs hit Padua in summer 2022, on 2-7 June, 21-23 July, and 4-8 August, when maximum temperatures were 35.1 degrees C, 36.1 degrees C, and 35.8 degrees C, respectively. The intensity and magnitude of UHIs were considerable, with land surface temperatures of 33.8 degrees C on average (& sigma; = 1.7, min = 27.9, max = 41.4). UHI intensity reached 5-8 degrees C of difference with rural contexts, mainly in strongly urbanized sectors. Ordinary least squares regression indicated a positive correlation with impervious surfaces, with a & beta; coefficient showing an average increase of 0.3 degrees C per 10% of soil sealing. Six different hotspots were identified both in industrial areas and within the city centre. However, the integrated climate risk analyses highlight that most critical areas are in sectors where there is a large number of the elderly, migrants, children, and low-income households. Our findings reveal the need for urgent heat island mitigation measures and that the distributive dimension of climate justice should be respected in adaptation planning.
C1 [Pappalardo, Salvatore Eugenio; Todeschi, Valeria] Univ Padua, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn ICEA, Adv Master GISci & UAV, I-35100 Padua, Italy.
   [Zanetti, Carlo] Univ Padua, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Padua, Italy.
   [Pappalardo, Salvatore Eugenio; Zanetti, Carlo] Univ Padua, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Lab GISci & Drones Good, Padua, Italy.
C3 University of Padua; University of Padua; University of Padua
RP Pappalardo, SE (corresponding author), Univ Padua, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn ICEA, Adv Master GISci & UAV, I-35100 Padua, Italy.; Pappalardo, SE (corresponding author), Univ Padua, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Lab GISci & Drones Good, Padua, Italy.
EM salvatore.pappalardo@unipd.it
RI todeschi, valeria/ABD-1086-2020
OI Pappalardo, Salvatore Eugenio/0000-0002-1546-644X; Zanetti,
   Carlo/0000-0003-2343-5536
FU Erasmus + Programme of the European Union [EAC/A02/2019]; 
   [620401-EPP-1-2020-1-IT-EPPJMO-CoE]
FX This article is part of the research activities of the Jean Monnet
   Center of Excellence on Climate Justice, by the support of Erasmus +
   Programme of the European Union, call for proposals EAC/A02/2019 -Jean
   Monnet Activities; Decision number 620401; Project number:
   620401-EPP-1-2020-1-IT-EPPJMO-CoE.
CR Amado C., 2022, UNRAVELLING URBAN HE
   AnandaBabu D, 2018, INT J ADV RES IDEAS, V4
   Andersson J., 2022, BBC             0719
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   ARPAV, 2022, HWF GIORN OND CAL
   Arsad FS, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph192316356
   Åström DO, 2011, MATURITAS, V69, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.03.008
   Balany F, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12123577
   Barnett J, 2006, CLIMATE CHANGE INSEC, P115
   Busato F, 2014, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V10, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2013.05.001
   Churchill SA, 2021, ENERG ECON, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105219
   Ciais P, 2005, NATURE, V437, P529, DOI 10.1038/nature03972
   Colelli FP, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-32471-1
   Comune di Padova, 2022, ANN STAT 2021
   Conti S, 2007, ENVIRON RES, V103, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2006.06.003
   Dosio A, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aab827
   Du HY, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V571, P461, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.012
   Eurostat, 2022, EXC MORT HITS 16 HIG
   Fears D., 2022, WASH POST
   Founda D, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-11407-6
   Gardiner S.M., 2011, The perfect moral storm: The ethical tragedy of climate change, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195379440.001.0001
   Ge X, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9100593
   Gualtieri A. E., 2022, CBS NEWS        0723
   Guerreiro SB, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaaad3
   He BJ, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103685
   Imran HM, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V197, P393, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.179
   Javanroodi K, 2021, J PHYS CONF SER, V2042, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/2042/1/012058
   Javanroodi K, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V829, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154223
   Kotharkar R, 2016, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000277
   Kovats RS, 2004, OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V61, P893, DOI 10.1136/oem.2003.012047
   Liao W, 2021, ENERG BUILDINGS, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111027
   Lobaccaro G, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.10.002
   Matthies F, 2009, INT J CIRCUMPOL HEAL, V68, P8, DOI 10.3402/ijch.v68i1.18293
   Maycock K., 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE 2021, DOI [10.1017/9781009157896, DOI 10.1017/9781009157896]
   Mentaschi L, 2022, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102441
   Messeri A, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16071090
   Mitchell BC, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18094800
   Mitchell D, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074006
   Mohtat N, 2022, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V4, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2022.919724
   Mohtat N, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100951
   Morabito M, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0127277
   Munafo M, 2022, Report SNPA 32/22
   Naumann G, 2020, JRC Publications Repository, DOI [DOI 10.2760/47878, 10.2760/47878,JRC118540]
   Nayak SG, 2018, PUBLIC HEALTH, V161, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.09.006
   Nitschke M, 2011, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V10, DOI 10.1186/1476-069X-10-42
   Noro M, 2015, INDOOR BUILT ENVIRON, V24, P514, DOI 10.1177/1420326X13517404
   Obradovich N, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P10953, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1801528115
   OKE TR, 1973, ATMOS ENVIRON, V7, P769, DOI 10.1016/0004-6981(73)90140-6
   Otto IM, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P1651, DOI 10.1007/s10113-017-1105-9
   Palinkas LA, 2020, CURR OPIN PSYCHOL, V32, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.023
   Paravantis J, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9040606
   Peng WCY, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101136
   Peroni F, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac6887
   Peroni F, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12010150
   Phelan PE, 2015, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V40, P285, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021155
   Porfiriev B, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V7, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.007
   Pristeri G, 2021, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V10, DOI 10.3390/ijgi10080538
   Pristeri G, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12125167
   Robine JM, 2008, CR BIOL, V331, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.crvi.2007.12.001
   Romanello M, 2021, LANCET, V398, P1619, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01787-6, 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01859-7]
   Rousi E, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-31432-y
   Royé D, 2021, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V32, P487, DOI 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001359
   Russo S, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124003
   Ruuhela R, 2021, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/atmos12010046
   Sakka A, 2012, ENERG BUILDINGS, V49, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.01.023
   Sanchez-Guevara C, 2019, ENERG BUILDINGS, V190, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.02.024
   Sangiorgio V, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-75018-4
   Santo FE, 2014, INT J CLIMATOL, V34, P1814, DOI 10.1002/joc.3803
   Serco Italia SPA, 2018, URB HEAT ISL SENT 3
   Shashua-Bar L, 2011, INT J CLIMATOL, V31, P1498, DOI 10.1002/joc.2177
   Singh N., 2020, Urban Ecology [Internet], P317, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-820730-7.00017-3, 10.1016/B978-0-12-820730-7.00017-3]
   Stone B, 2021, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V55, P6957, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.1c00024
   Sultana F, 2022, GEOGR J, V188, P118, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12417
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Swanson K, 2021, URBAN PLAN, V6, P287, DOI 10.17645/up.v6i4.4399
   Todeschi V, 2022, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V11, DOI 10.3390/ijgi11090490
   Tomlinson CJ, 2011, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V10, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-10-42
   UNFCCC, 2021, NAT DET CONTR PAR AG
   Vandentorren S, 2006, EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH, V16, P583, DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckl063
   Vanos JK, 2015, ENVIRON INT, V76, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.016
   Wang J, 2021, URBAN ECOSYST, V24, P1165, DOI 10.1007/s11252-021-01104-8
   WMO, 2022, CLIM CHANG EXTR WEAT
   World Bank, 2023, POPULATION
   Xu ZW, 2014, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V58, P239, DOI 10.1007/s00484-013-0655-x
   Yensukho P, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, P1
   Yuan F, 2007, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V106, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.003
   Yue WZ, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V671, P1036, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.421
   Zanter K., 2018, Landsat surface temperature (ST) product guide
NR 88
TC 24
Z9 24
U1 44
U2 116
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD OCT
PY 2023
VL 238
AR 104831
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104831
EA JUL 2023
PG 27
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional
   & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public
   Administration; Urban Studies
GA N4RG7
UT WOS:001036897200001
OA Green Submitted, hybrid
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Marzouk, M
   Attia, K
   Azab, S
AF Marzouk, Mohamed
   Attia, Khalid
   Azab, Shimaa
TI Assessment of Coastal Vulnerability to Climate Change Impacts using GIS
   and Remote Sensing: A Case Study of Al-Alamein New City
SO JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; Coastal areas; Vulnerability; Geographic Information
   System (GIS); Remote sensing (RS)
AB Recently, climate change has become a catastrophic phenomenon in the whole world. It has not only devastating effects on the environment but also on the social and economic aspects of societies, especially those seeking to achieve sustainable development. Coastal areas are classified as one of the areas that are particularly exposed to current and projected risks connected to climate change. Selection of suitable climate adaptation means requires an integrated evaluation of climate change impacts and detects the vulnerability degree of various areas exposed to climate change. Therefore, this paper uses Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques to develop a GIS data model (Climate-Coastal Model) for evaluating the long-term impacts of climate changes and delineating the most vulnerable areas in coastal zones. In this regard, specific indicators are needed to detect the vulnerable areas. Four main effective parameters of climate change impacts were selected, which are meteorological parameter, topographical structures parameter (Earth Shape), engineering geology parameter, and shoreline parameter. The paper considered that all indicators in the four parameters have equal weights, where the results depended on changing the values of model indicators during the study period, which is 30 years. Al-Alamein New City in Egypt is presented as a case study to demonstrate the practical features of the proposed model. The results of a developed model according to 30 years study period reveal that the affected areas from climate change impacts are those located along the shoreline. Vulnerability along the shoreline has divided into three categories. The first one represents the least vulnerable areas, which located in Al-Alamein city and constitute about 0.00154 km(2) from the total area (227.65 km(2)). This is due to being affected by low values of meteorological indicators and minor erosion and accretion processes comparing to the other sections. The second one represents the moderate vulnerable areas, which scattered throughout all sections of the case study: Al-Alamein City, Tel Al-Eis, and Sidi Abd El-Rahman. It constitutes about 0.9941 km(2) from the total area. The last one represents the most vulnerable areas, which located also in all sections of the study area and forms about 0.72092 km(2) from the total area which have low elevations below the average mean of sea water level that means it is most vulnerable to any climate change scenarios. It is also affected by high values of coastal erosion, costal accretion, and wind speed as well as a high percentage of dew point. The proposed model is considered as a decision support tool, which helps the decision-makers to detect the vulnerability degree of any areas exposed to climate-change impacts based on multi-criteria and parameter to give the priority for such areas. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
C1 [Marzouk, Mohamed] Cairo Univ, Fac Engn, Struct Engn Dept, Giza, Egypt.
   [Attia, Khalid; Azab, Shimaa] Inst Natl Planning, Environm Planning & Dev Ctr, Cairo, Egypt.
C3 Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); Cairo University; Institute of National
   Planning
RP Azab, S (corresponding author), Inst Natl Planning, Environm Planning & Dev Ctr, Cairo, Egypt.
EM mmarzouk@staff.cu.edu.eg; k.attia@inp.edu.eg; shaymaa.azab@inp.edu.eg
RI Marzouk, Mohamed/AAA-2717-2021
OI Marzouk, Mohamed/0000-0002-8594-8452
CR [Anonymous], 2013, COMPUTATIONAL GEOMET
   Arun PV, 2013, EGYPT J REMOTE SENS, V16, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrs.2013.09.001
   Attia S., 2016, GEN STRATEGIC PLAN
   BenDor T.K., 2018, GIS COASTAL VULNERAB, P236
   Bozek P, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11192259
   Calewaert J.-B., 2011, CLIMATE CHANGE MARIN, P151
   Childs C, 2004, Interpolating surfaces in ArcGIS spatial Analyst, V3235, P569
   Cramer W, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P972, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0299-2
   Djouder F, 2017, ARAB J GEOSCI, V10, DOI 10.1007/s12517-017-3062-5
   Effat A., 2013, J. Geogr. Inf. Syst, V5, P567, DOI [10.4236/jgis.2013.56054, DOI 10.4236/JGIS.2013.56054]
   Eichelberger S., 2008, North American Windpower, V7, P68
   El-helw M., 2008, C P 7 INT C EARTH OB
   El-Nahry AH, 2010, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V59, P1497, DOI 10.1007/s12665-009-0135-0
   El-Sammany M., 2011, NILE BASIN WATER SCI, V4, P49
   Faour G., 2013, J SURV MAPP ENG, V1, P41
   Fernando G.M.T.S., 2017, COASTAL PROCESSES CA
   Firth LB, 2013, ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP, V15, P1665, DOI 10.1039/c3em00313b
   Ford M, 2013, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V135, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2013.03.027
   GIBB JG, 1978, NEW ZEAL J MAR FRESH, V12, P429, DOI 10.1080/00288330.1978.9515770
   Hadjimitsis DG, 2004, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V5239, P464, DOI 10.1117/12.511520
   Hauer ME, 2019, POPUL ENVIRON, V40, P369, DOI 10.1007/s11111-019-00315-8
   Hay J, 2006, SUSTAIN SCI, V1, P23, DOI 10.1007/s11625-006-0011-8
   He Q, 2019, CURR BIOL, V29, pR1021, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.042
   Hernando D., 2015, Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, V2, P155, DOI DOI 10.1007/S40515-015-0024-9
   Hoekema D.J., 2011, A system dynamics approach for climate change impact analysis in the Snake River Basin
   Huang F, 2011, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V37, P426, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2010.05.024
   Hutchinson M. F., 1988, Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, P117
   Jackson J.A., 2005, GLOSSARY GEOLOGY, V779
   Jenkins S.A., 2003, ACCRETION EROSION WA
   Kantamaneni K, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11020393
   Kennedy V.S., 2002, COASTAL MARINE ECOSY
   Kumar V., 2016, INT C CLIM CHANG ITS, DOI [10.13140/ RG.2.2.35031.52647, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.35031.52647]
   Latifovic R, 2007, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V106, P492, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.015
   Leal W, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V692, P1175, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.227
   Li J., 2008, A Review of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Environmental Scientists, P137
   Li LF, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V217, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.162
   Mahendra RS, 2011, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V54, P302, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.12.008
   Masud MM, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V156, P698, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.060
   McInnes R., 2006, Responding to the risks from climate change in coastal zones. A good practice guide. LIFE Environment project 'Response'-'Responding to the risks from climate change
   Mesev V., 2008, Integration of GIS and Remote Sensing, V19
   Minarík R, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11202428
   Muggah R., 2019, HERES SOME ARE FIGHT
   Murali RM, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P3291, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-3291-2013
   Nathanail J, 2009, ENG GEOL SPEC PUBL S, V22, P65, DOI 10.1144/EGSP22.5
   Neumann B, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0118571
   Pantusa D, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10091218
   Petkov N., 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUTER, V5702
   Prasad D.H., 2014, INT J GEOSCI, V5
   Rahman B., 2018, Daily sun
   Rentschler J. E., 2020, 1 47 BILLION PEOPLE
   Roberts B.H., 2015, WORK PAP URBAN FRON
   Rodriguez-Delgado C, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V222, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.058
   Sibson R., 1981, INTERPRETING MULTIVA, P21, DOI DOI 10.1007/3-540-26772-7_8
   Sisodia PS, 2014, 2014 RECENT ADVANCES AND INNOVATIONS IN ENGINEERING (ICRAIE)
   Thieler E.R., 1999, U.S. Atlantic Coast: U.S, Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-593, P1
   Torresan S, 2008, SUSTAIN SCI, V3, P45, DOI 10.1007/s11625-008-0045-1
   Wallace J. M., 2006, ATMOSPHERIC SCI INTR, P92
   Wolf J., 2020, Mar. Clim. Chang. Impacts Partnersh. Sci. Rev, V2020, P456, DOI DOI 10.14465/2020.ARC07.SAW
   World Meteorological Organization, 2017, WMO GUID CALC CLIM N
   Xu YY, 2015, ADV METEOROL, V2015, DOI 10.1155/2015/793107
   Yang J, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101487
   Zhu SJ, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10020323
NR 62
TC 20
Z9 20
U1 5
U2 45
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0959-6526
EI 1879-1786
J9 J CLEAN PROD
JI J. Clean Prod.
PD MAR 25
PY 2021
VL 290
AR 125723
DI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125723
EA JAN 2021
PG 19
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA QK3IT
UT WOS:000620274900007
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Hulme, PE
AF Hulme, Philip E.
TI Climate change and biological invasions: evidence, expectations, and
   response options
SO BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
LA English
DT Article
DE biosecurity; exotic; globalisation; non-native; pathways; species
   distribution models; weed
ID POTENTIAL DISTRIBUTION RANGES; GREAT-BRITAIN; CAMERARIA-OHRIDELLA;
   NONNATIVE PLANTS; ALIEN; TEMPERATURE; RISK; DISEASES; IMPACTS; EUROPE
AB A changing climate may directly or indirectly influence biological invasions by altering the likelihood of introduction or establishment, as well as modifying the geographic range, environmental impacts, economic costs or management of alien species. A comprehensive assessment of empirical and theoretical evidence identified how each of these processes is likely to be shaped by climate change for alien plants, animals and pathogens in terrestrial, freshwater and marine environments of Great Britain. The strongest contemporary evidence for the potential role of climate change in the establishment of new alien species is for terrestrial arthropods, as a result of their ectothermic physiology, often high dispersal rate and their strong association with trade as well as commensal relationships with human environments. By contrast, there is little empirical support for higher temperatures increasing the rate of alien plant establishment due to the stronger effects of residence time and propagule pressure. The magnitude of any direct climate effect on the number of new alien species will be small relative to human-assisted introductions driven by socioeconomic factors. Casual alien species (sleepers) whose population persistence is limited by climate are expected to exhibit greater rates of establishment under climate change assuming that propagule pressure remains at least at current levels. Surveillance and management targeting sleeper pests and diseases may be the most cost-effective option to reduce future impacts under climate change. Most established alien species will increase their distribution range in Great Britain over the next century. However, such range increases are very likely be the result of natural expansion of populations that have yet to reach equilibrium with their environment, rather than a direct consequence of climate change. To assess the potential realised range of alien species will require a spatially explicit approach that not only integrates bioclimatic suitability and population-level demographic rates but also simulation of landscape-level processes (e.g. dispersal, land-use change, host/habitat distribution, non-climatic edaphic constraints). In terms of invasive alien species that have known economic or biodiversity impacts, the taxa that are likely to be the most responsive are plant pathogens and insect pests of agricultural crops. However, the extent to which climate adaptation strategies lead to new crops, altered rotations, and different farming practices (e.g. irrigation, fertilization) will all shape the potential agricultural impacts of alien species. The greatest uncertainty in the effects of climate change on biological invasions exists with identifying the future character of new species introductions and predicting ecosystem impacts. Two complementary strategies may work under these conditions of high uncertainty: (i) prioritise ecosystems in terms of their perceived vulnerability to climate change and prevent ingress or expansion of alien species therein that may exacerbate problems; (ii) target those ecosystem already threatened by alien species and implement management to prevent the situation deteriorating under climate change.
C1 [Hulme, Philip E.] Lincoln Univ, Bioprotect Res Ctr, POB 85084, Christchurch, New Zealand.
C3 Lincoln University - New Zealand
RP Hulme, PE (corresponding author), Lincoln Univ, Bioprotect Res Ctr, POB 85084, Christchurch, New Zealand.
EM Philip.hulme@lincoln.ac.nz
RI Hulme, Philip/F-7454-2011
FU UK Living with Environmental Change (LWEC)
FX This work was supported by the UK Living with Environmental Change
   (LWEC) partnership as part of its climate change impacts report card
   programme.
CR Anderson PK, 2004, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V19, P535, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.021
   [Anonymous], AUDIT NONNATIVE SPEC
   [Anonymous], 2009, Handbook of Alien Species in Europe
   [Anonymous], 2015, Biodiversity Climate Change Impacts Summary Report
   Ashton GV, 2007, MAR ENVIRON RES, V64, P305, DOI 10.1016/j.marenvres.2007.02.003
   Bacon SJ, 2014, DIVERS DISTRIB, V20, P84, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12149
   Baker R.H.A., 1996, Aspects of Applied Biology, V45, P323
   Baker R. H. A., 1998, BRIGHT CROP PROT C P, VIII, P979
   Baker RHA, 2003, BCPC INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS CROP SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2003, VOL 1 AND 2, CONGRESS PROCEEDINGS, P1201
   Baker RHA, 2000, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V82, P57, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00216-4
   Bale JS, 2002, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V8, P1, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00451.x
   Barbet-Massin M, 2013, BIOL CONSERV, V157, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.09.015
   Barredo J. I., 2015, Bulletin OEPP, V45, P273, DOI 10.1111/epp.12208
   Beckmann B, 2012, Non-native Species in Great Britain: establishment, detection and reporting to inform effective decision making
   BEERLING DJ, 1995, J VEG SCI, V6, P269, DOI 10.2307/3236222
   BELL DJ, 1991, J ZOOL, V224, P639, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1991.tb03792.x
   Bellard C, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P3740, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12344
   Berry PM, 2002, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V11, P453, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2002.00304.x
   Bourdôt GW, 2012, BIOL INVASIONS, V14, P1545, DOI 10.1007/s10530-010-9905-6
   Bradley BA, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2009.12.003
   Bradley BA, 2010, BIOL INVASIONS, V12, P1855, DOI 10.1007/s10530-009-9597-y
   Brasier C. M., 1994, Bulletin OEPP, V24, P221, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2338.1994.tb01063.x
   Britton JR, 2010, FRESHWATER BIOL, V55, P1130, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02396.x
   Buckland SM, 2001, J APPL ECOL, V38, P301, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00603.x
   Burrows MT, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P652, DOI 10.1126/science.1210288
   Castellanos-Frias E, 2014, ANN APPL BIOL, V165, P53, DOI 10.1111/aab.12117
   Catterall S, 2012, ECOGRAPHY, V35, P901, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07190.x
   Chakraborty S, 2011, PLANT PATHOL, V60, P2, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02411.x
   Chapman DS, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P192, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12380
   Chen YH, 2008, INTEGR ZOOL, V3, P166, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2008.00095.x
   Chown SL, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P4938, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1119787109
   Collingham YC, 2000, J APPL ECOL, V37, P13, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00556.x
   Compagnoni A, 2014, ECOSPHERE, V5, DOI 10.1890/ES14-00047.1
   Cowling JE, 2003, COMP BIOCHEM PHYS A, V136, P735, DOI 10.1016/S1095-6433(03)00242-3
   Defra, 2009, NUIS INS CLIM CHANG
   Dias PJ, 2011, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V670, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10750-011-0664-x
   Diez JM, 2012, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V10, P249, DOI 10.1890/110137
   Donnelly A, 2011, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V55, P805, DOI 10.1007/s00484-011-0426-5
   Dukes JS, 1999, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V14, P135, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01554-7
   Essl F, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P203, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1011728108
   Evans Hugh, 2002, Great Britain Forestry Commission Bulletin, V125, P99
   Evans K. A., 2010, Aspects of Applied Biology, P29
   Evans K.A., 1996, Aspects of Applied Biology, V45, P335
   Fausch KD, 2007, J FISH BIOL, V71, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01682.x
   Fischer D, 2014, EUROSURVEILLANCE, V19, P34, DOI 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.6.20696
   Flojgaard C, 2009, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V8, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/8/1/012016
   Fobert E, 2011, J FISH BIOL, V79, P1592, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03083.x
   Frenot Y, 2005, BIOL REV, V80, P45, DOI 10.1017/S1464793104006542
   Froud-Williams R. J., 1996, Aspects of Applied Biology, P187
   Gallardo B, 2013, BIOL CONSERV, V160, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.02.001
   Gallardo B, 2013, J APPL ECOL, V50, P757, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12079
   Gilbert M, 2005, J APPL ECOL, V42, P805, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01074.x
   Gloster J, 2007, VET REC, V160, P422, DOI 10.1136/vr.160.13.422
   Gormley AM, 2013, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V19, P1038, DOI 10.1080/10807039.2012.708248
   Gröner F, 2011, J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL, V409, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.jembe.2011.08.002
   Guareschi S, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059757
   Guichard S, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0112491
   HALES JM, 1989, BOT MAR, V32, P167, DOI 10.1515/botm.1989.32.2.167
   Hardwick N.V., 1996, Aspects of Applied Biology, V45, P261
   Hart AJ, 2002, J INSECT PHYSIOL, V48, P593, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1910(02)00087-2
   Harwood TD, 2011, PLANT PATHOL, V60, P545, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02391.x
   Hellmann JJ, 2008, CONSERV BIOL, V22, P534, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00951.x
   Howden SM, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P19691, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701890104
   Hulme M., 1997, CLIMATES BRIT ISLES
   Hulme PE, 2008, J APPL ECOL, V45, P403, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01442.x
   Hulme PE, 2009, WEED RES, V49, P19, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2008.00658.x
   Hulme PE, 2015, J APPL ECOL, V52, P1418, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12470
   Hulme PE, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, pE2988, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1506517112
   Hulme PE, 2011, FIFTY YEARS OF INVASION ECOLOGY: THE LEGACY OF CHARLES ELTON, P301
   Hulme PE, 2011, NEW PHYTOL, V189, P272, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03446.x
   Hulme PE, 2009, J APPL ECOL, V46, P10, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01600.x
   Ibáñez I, 2009, J APPL ECOL, V46, P1219, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01736.x
   Ibáñez I, 2009, ECOL APPL, V19, P359, DOI 10.1890/07-2095.1
   Jenkins G., 2009, The climate of the UK and recent trends
   Jones DR, 2007, PLANT PATHOL, V56, P891, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2007.01619.x
   Jones MC, 2013, AQUAT CONSERV, V23, P710, DOI 10.1002/aqc.2364
   Keith SA, 2009, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V276, P3539, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2009.0938
   Kornis MS, 2012, J FISH BIOL, V80, P235, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03157.x
   Kriticos DJ, 2011, WEED RES, V51, P85, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2010.00827.x
   Liu XA, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0018429
   Loomans A. J. M., 2013, IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, V94, P15
   Lurgi M, 2015, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V6, P247, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12315
   Marcos-López M, 2010, TRANSBOUND EMERG DIS, V57, P293, DOI 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2010.01150.x
   Maskell LC, 2006, J ECOL, V94, P1052, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01172.x
   Mason SC, 2015, BIOL J LINN SOC, V115, P586, DOI 10.1111/bij.12574
   McGregor KF, 2012, DIVERS DISTRIB, V18, P1013, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00942.x
   Medlock JM, 2015, LANCET INFECT DIS, V15, P721, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70091-5
   Meynard CN, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0066445
   Morecroft MD, 2008, FORESTRY, V81, P59, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpm045
   Murphy J., 2010, UK CLIMATE PROJECTIO
   Natural England, 2009, HOR SCANN NEW INV NO
   O'Donnell J, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P617, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02537.x
   Parker I.M., 1999, Biological Invasions, V1, P3, DOI 10.1023/A:1010034312781
   Parmesan C, 2003, NATURE, V421, P37, DOI 10.1038/nature01286
   Pearce-Higgins JW., 2015, Research on the assessment of risks opportunities for species in England as a result of climate change
   Preston CD., 2002, NEW ATLAS BRIT IRISH
   Pryor SC, 2012, CLIM DYNAM, V38, P189, DOI 10.1007/s00382-010-0955-3
   Purse BV, 2015, J BIOGEOGR, V42, P575, DOI 10.1111/jbi.12423
   Pysek P, 2008, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V23, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2008.02.002
   Raybaud V, 2015, BIOL INVASIONS, V17, P725, DOI 10.1007/s10530-014-0764-4
   Reid P. C., 2009, MARINE CLIMATE CHANG, P1
   Rodríguez-Rey M, 2013, ECOL MODEL, V256, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.01.024
   Rödder D, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007843
   Roura-Pascual N, 2004, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V271, P2527, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2004.2898
   Roy HE, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P3859, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12603
   Settele Josef, 2008, BioRisk, V1, P1
   Shardlow M.E.A., 2004, British Journal of Entomology and Natural History, V17, P143
   Shwartz A, 2009, DIVERS DISTRIB, V15, P310, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00538.x
   Smith RM, 2007, AGR FOREST ENTOMOL, V9, P307, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2007.00349.x
   Sparks TH, 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V11, P507, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00910.x
   Sparks TH, 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V11, P22, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00887.x
   Stephenson SR, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V118, P885, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0685-0
   Stiels D, 2011, J ORNITHOL, V152, P769, DOI 10.1007/s10336-011-0662-9
   Storkey J, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0088156
   Straw N. A., 1995, Scottish Forestry, V49, P134
   Thorne F. S., 2004, RMIS, V4919
   Trnka M, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2298, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02396.x
   Tubby KV, 2010, FORESTRY, V83, P451, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpq027
   UKMO, 2006, HIST CENTR ENGL TEMP
   UKNEA, 2011, UK NAT EC ASS SYNTH
   Vanhanen H., 2008, Bulletin OEPP, V38, P249, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2008.01212.x
   Vanhanen H., 2008, Bulletin OEPP, V38, P239, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2008.01211.x
   VILA M, 2006, TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTE, P115
   Walmsley C.A., 2007, MONARCH MODELLING NA
   Walther GR, 2009, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V24, P686, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.008
   Watt MS, 2011, WEED SCI, V59, P538, DOI 10.1614/WS-D-11-00032.1
   Welch D., 2001, AUDIT ALIEN SPECIES
   West JS, 2012, EUR J PLANT PATHOL, V133, P315, DOI 10.1007/s10658-011-9932-x
   Williams F., 2010, EC COST INVASIVE NON
   Willis SG, 2002, FUNCT ECOL, V16, P530, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00653.x
   Wisz MS, 2013, BIOL REV, V88, P15, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00235.x
NR 131
TC 242
Z9 276
U1 15
U2 437
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1464-7931
EI 1469-185X
J9 BIOL REV
JI Biol. Rev.
PD AUG
PY 2017
VL 92
IS 3
BP 1297
EP 1313
DI 10.1111/brv.12282
PG 17
WC Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Other Topics
GA EZ5HF
UT WOS:000404744100003
PM 27241717
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Guise, I
   Silva, B
   Mestre, F
   Muñoz-Rojas, J
   Duarte, MF
   Herrera, JM
AF Guise, Ines
   Silva, Bruno
   Mestre, Frederico
   Munoz-Rojas, Jose
   Duarte, Maria F.
   Herrera, Jose M.
TI Climate change is expected to severely impact Protected Designation of
   Origin olive growing regions over the Iberian Peninsula
SO AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Agroecology; Climate adaptation; Ecological niche modelling;
   Environmental suitability; Mediterranean; Olive tree
AB CONTEXT: The Iberian Peninsula is the world's largest olive ( Olea europaea subsp. europaea L. ) producing region due to its high environmental suitability for olive growing, consistently accounting for about half of the global share. Moreover, it includes a range of olive-producing regions with Protected Designation of Origin (PDO), aimed to safeguard and promote the distinctive geographical status of agricultural products linked to unique environmental characteristics. Despite the olive industry's economic importance, the impact of climate change on the environmental suitability and the environmental distinctiveness of olive-producing regions is still far from being understood. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our work was twofold. First, to evaluate changes in the spatial distribution patterns of environmental suitability for olive growing both within and outside PDOs across the Iberian Peninsula under two climate change scenarios within a 2050 time horizon. Second, to evaluate the ability of PDOs to retain their distinctive environmental characteristics in response to new climate regimes. METHODS: The study area was framed using 1 x 1 km square plots. We used an Ecological Niche Modelling approach, firstly, to model the environmental correlates of environmental suitability for olive growing and, secondly, to forecast their relative change within and outside PDOs. The estimated change in environmental suitability for olive growing was calculated as the percentage variation between the present and each climate change scenario. Additionally, a Random Forests Modelling approach was employed, firstly, to model the environmental correlates of PDOs and, secondly, to evaluate their environmental distinctiveness based on the probability of belonging to a given PDO. The estimated change in environmental distinctiveness of PDOs was calculated as the percentage variation between present and future in the probability of belonging to the same PDO. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest significant climate-driven range shifts of environmental suitability toward northern latitudes, leading to widespread reductions in southern latitudes both within and outside PDO olive-growing regions. Climate change will also severely affect the idiosyncratic environmental envelope of most PDOs, leading to the loss of their environmental distinctiveness. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study demonstrates that climate change's impact on olive growing in the Iberian Peninsula might be stronger than previously thought. We propose exploiting the existing genotypic and phenotypic diversity related to climate- or climate diversity- as a way to adapt O. europaea crops to shifting climates and, in turn, allow olive growers to continue to grow in their current location for many years to come.
C1 [Guise, Ines; Silva, Bruno; Mestre, Frederico; Munoz-Rojas, Jose; Herrera, Jose M.] Univ Evora, MED Mediterranean Inst Agr Environm & Dev, Inst Invest & Formacao Avancada, Ap 94, P-7006554 Evora, Portugal.
   [Guise, Ines; Silva, Bruno; Mestre, Frederico; Munoz-Rojas, Jose; Herrera, Jose M.] Univ Evora, CHANGE Global Change & Sustainabil Inst, Inst Invest & Formacao Avancada, Ap 94, P-7006554 Evora, Portugal.
   [Mestre, Frederico] Univ Evora, Rui Nabeiro Biodivers Chair, Casa Cordovil,2 Andar, P-7000890 Evora, Portugal.
   [Mestre, Frederico] Univ Algarve, Ctr Marine Sci, CCMAR, P-8005139 Faro, Portugal.
   [Munoz-Rojas, Jose] Univ Evora, Dept Landscape Environm & Planning Colegio Luis A, Rua Romao Ramalho 59, P-7000671 Evora, Portugal.
   [Duarte, Maria F.] Inst Politecn Beja IPBeja, Alentejo Biotechnol Ctr Agr & Agrofood CEBAL, P-7801908 Beja, Portugal.
   [Duarte, Maria F.] CEBAL, MED Medmediterranean Inst Agr Environm & Dev, P-7801908 Beja, Portugal.
   [Duarte, Maria F.] CEBAL, CHANGE Global Change & Sustainabil Inst, P-7801908 Beja, Portugal.
   [Herrera, Jose M.] Univ Cadiz, Dept Biol, Inst Invest Vitivinicola & Agroalimentaria, Puerto Real, Spain.
C3 University of Evora; University of Evora; University of Evora;
   Universidade do Algarve; University of Evora; Instituto Politecnico de
   Beja; Universidad de Cadiz
RP Guise, I; Herrera, JM (corresponding author), Univ Evora, MED Mediterranean Inst Agr Environm & Dev, Inst Invest & Formacao Avancada, Ap 94, P-7006554 Evora, Portugal.; Guise, I; Herrera, JM (corresponding author), Univ Evora, CHANGE Global Change & Sustainabil Inst, Inst Invest & Formacao Avancada, Ap 94, P-7006554 Evora, Portugal.
EM inesguise@uevora.pt
RI Herrera, José/L-7432-2013; Mestre, Frederico/L-7335-2013; Silva,
   Bruno/JRW-8182-2023
OI Mestre, Frederico/0000-0002-7390-1120; Silva, Bruno/0000-0002-7323-513X
FU OLEAdapt - Portuguese National Public Agency for Sci-ence, Technology
   and Innovation; SUSTAINOLIVE - PRIMA EU programme [1822]; FCT
   [UI/BD/153512/2022, SFRH/BD/137803/2018]; Alentejo 2020 RHAQ research
   contract [ALT2059-2019-24]; European Union [ALT2059-2019-24]; MCIN/AEI
   [CSN2022-135655]; FCT-Portugal [UIDB/05183/2020, LA/P/0121/2020]
FX This work was supported by the projects OLEAdapt
   (PTDC/BIA-CBI/1365/2020) funded by the Portuguese National Public Agency
   for Sci-ence, Technology and Innovation, and the SUSTAINOLIVE funded by
   the PRIMA EU programme.IG and BS were supported by FCT grants
   (UI/BD/153512/2022 and SFRH/BD/137803/2018, respectively) . FM was
   supported by an Alentejo 2020 RHAQ research contract (ref.
   ALT2059-2019-24) . JMR was funded by the SUSTAINOLIVE project (Grant No.
   1822; PRIMA EU Programme) . JMH was supported by a Maria Zambrano
   contract (University of Cadiz, Ministry of Universities, Recovery,
   Transformation, and Resilience Plan - Funded by the European Union -
   Next Generation EU) and the action CSN2022-135655 funded by
   MCIN/AEI/10.130 39/501100011033 and the European Union - Next Generation
   EU/PRTR. This work was also funded by Project UIDB/05183/2020
   (FCT-Portugal) to Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture Environment
   and Development (MED) , and Project LA/P/0121/2020 to CHANGE - Global
   Change and Sustainability Institute.
CR Alfieri SM, 2019, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V24, P435, DOI 10.1007/s11027-018-9820-1
   Allouche O, 2006, J APPL ECOL, V43, P1223, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x
   AMA, 2022, o Administrativa
   [Anonymous], 2012, OFFICIAL J EUROPEA L, VL197, P38, DOI [10.3000/19770677.L_2012.197.eng, DOI 10.3000/19770677.L_2012.197.ENG]
   [Anonymous], 2019, R FDN STAT COMPUTING
   Araújo MB, 2007, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V22, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010
   Arenas-Castro S, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V709, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136161
   Barranco D., 2000, HortTechnology, V10, P107
   Breiman L, 2001, MACH LEARN, V45, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Connor D. J., 2005, Horticultural Reviews, V31, P155, DOI 10.1002/9780470650882.ch4
   DeAndreis P., 2022, Olive Oil Times
   DGADR, 2016, DOP - Denominaca"o de Origem Protegida (Produtos agricolas e generos alimenticios)
   DGAV, 2022, Registo Nacional de Variedades de Fruteiras
   EC, 2022, Geographical indications registers
   EC, 2010, Soil pH in Europe
   EU, 2018, Copernicus Land Monitoring Service
   FAO, 2022, FAOSTAT FOOD AGR DAT
   Fick SE, 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P4302, DOI 10.1002/joc.5086
   FRIEDMAN JH, 1991, ANN STAT, V19, P1, DOI 10.1214/aos/1176347963
   Goberville E, 2015, ECOL EVOL, V5, P1100, DOI 10.1002/ece3.1411
   Guisan A., 2017, Habitat Suitability and Distribution Models: With Applications in R, V1, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781139028271
   Hastie T, 1996, J ROY STAT SOC B, V58, P155
   Hastie TJ., 1990, Generalized Additive Models
   Hearst MA, 1998, IEEE INTELL SYST APP, V13, P18, DOI 10.1109/5254.708428
   Hijmans Robert J, 2023, CRAN
   Hosmer DW, 2000, APPL LOGISTIC REGRES, DOI DOI 10.1002/0471722146
   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2023, Climate Change 2021The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844.001, DOI 10.1017/9781009157940, 10.1017/9781009157896]
   IOC, 2022, IOC News
   Jordao P., 2014, Boas Praticas no Olival e no Lagar
   Liaw A., 2002, R N, V2, P18
   Loh WY, 2011, WIRES DATA MIN KNOWL, V1, P14, DOI 10.1002/widm.8
   MAPA, 2017, Calidad Diferenciada
   Marchi M, 2020, SCI DATA, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41597-020-00763-0
   Morales-Castilla I, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P2864, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1906731117
   Moriondo M, 2013, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V22, P818, DOI 10.1111/geb.12061
   Myers N, 2000, NATURE, V403, P853, DOI 10.1038/35002501
   Naimi B, 2016, ECOGRAPHY, V39, P368, DOI 10.1111/ecog.01881
   Naimi B, 2014, ECOGRAPHY, V37, P191, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00205.x
   NELDER JA, 1972, J R STAT SOC SER A-G, V135, P370, DOI 10.2307/2344614
   Ponti L, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P5598, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1314437111
   QGIS Development Team, 2022, QGIS Geographic Information System
   Ridgeway G., 1999, Comput. Sci. Stat, V31, P172
   Tanasijevic L, 2014, AGR WATER MANAGE, V144, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.05.019
   Tang Y, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0189496
   Taylor KE, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P485, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
   Venables W. N., 2002, Modern Applied Statistics with S, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
   Wolkovich EM, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P29, DOI 10.1038/s41558-017-0016-6
NR 47
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 4
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0308-521X
EI 1873-2267
J9 AGR SYST
JI Agric. Syst.
PD OCT
PY 2024
VL 220
AR 104108
DI 10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104108
EA AUG 2024
PG 9
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA E7R6P
UT WOS:001304943900001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Tudoran, MM
   Marquer, L
   Jönsson, AM
AF Tudoran, Mihaela-Mariana
   Marquer, Laurent
   Jonsson, Anna Maria
TI Historical experience (1850-1950 and 1961-2014) of insect species
   responsible for forest damage in Sweden: Influence of climate and land
   management changes
SO FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; Forest damage; Insects; Landscape management;
   Scandinavia
ID IPS-TYPOGRAPHUS; BARK BEETLE; PESTS; STORM
AB The ongoing climate change can influence the dynamic of insect populations and therefore the Insect species Responsible for Forest Damage ("insects-RFD" hereafter). The present study aims at identifying the most occurring insects-RFD in Sweden, and exploring the relationships between insects-RFD and climate and land management changes. The recorded insect attacks based on historical reports, literature and databases, were collected for North, Central and South of Sweden, and for two periods at yearly time scales: 1850-1950 and 1961-2014. A series of analyses has been carried out based on this dataset: 1 Estimation of the occurrence of each insects-RFD over years to assess which insect species have caused the major forest damage, 2-Ratios of broadleaved versus conifer host trees to estimate the main types of damaged forests, and 3-Canonical correspondence analyses to evaluate how much climate (winter and summer temperature, winter and summer precipitation, and storms) and land management (land areas for wood production, standing volume for all trees and standing volume for deciduous trees) changes have affected insects-RFD. The results reveal that the most occurring insects-RFD differ between the North and South of Sweden, and between 1850-1950 and 1961-2014. The most occurring insects-RFD since 1850 were Ips typographus, Neodiprion sertifer, Tortrix viridana, Hylobius abietis and Tomicus piniperda. The occurrences of insects-RFD have been higher in the South of Sweden since at least 1850 than in other regions. The North of Sweden have been mostly affected by insects-RFD between 1911 and 1950. Canonical correspondence analyses show that the spread of insects-RFD might be related to environmental conditions. More particularly, the insects-RFD variation explained are increasing between 1902-1950 and 1961-2007 in all Sweden for temperature (winter and summer) and in Central and South of Sweden for storm damage. However, the evolution of landscape management would participate in influencing insects-RFD, in particular from 1961, when changes in forest management (e.g. increase in land areas for wood production) have been developed, as well as the way to report insect forest damages. This long-term perspective of how changes in climate and land management have influenced insects-RFD is of great interest for further discussion about climate adaptation strategies in forestry and ecosystem services. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Tudoran, Mihaela-Mariana; Marquer, Laurent; Jonsson, Anna Maria] Lund Univ, Dept Phys Geog & Ecosyst Sci, Solvegatan 12, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden.
C3 Lund University
RP Marquer, L (corresponding author), Lund Univ, Dept Phys Geog & Ecosyst Sci, Solvegatan 12, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden.
EM laurent.marquer.es@gmail.com
OI MARQUER, LAURENT/0000-0002-5772-3782
CR Ahti T., 1968, Annales Botanici Fennici, Helsinki, V5, P168
   Andrew NR, 2013, PEERJ, V1, DOI 10.7717/peerj.11
   [Anonymous], 2008, FOR STAT 2008 OFF ST
   [Anonymous], 2014, Multivariate analysis of ccological data using CANOCO 5
   Austara O., 1983, FAUNA NORV B, V31, P8
   Barford E., 2013, Nature News
   Barklund A., 2009, SWEDISH FORESTRY MOD
   Bebber DP, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P985, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1990, 10.1038/nclimate1990]
   Berglund B.E., 1991, ECOLOGICAL B, V41, P1
   Björkman C, 2015, CABI CLIM CHANGE SER, V7, P248, DOI 10.1079/9781780643786.0248
   Björkman C, 2011, FORESTS, V2, P474, DOI 10.3390/f2020474
   Byers J. A., 2006, BARK WOOD BORING INS
   Byers JA, 2004, NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, V91, P215, DOI 10.1007/s00114-004-0520-1
   CHRISTIANSEN E, 1970, Norsk Entomologisk Tidsskrift, V17, P153
   Douce G. K., 2002, U GEORGIA US SPECIAL, V16
   EHNSTROM B, 1974, Annales Entomologici Fennici, V40, P37
   Ehnstrom B., 1998, RAPPORT SKOGFORSKN S, V2, P1
   Eidmann H.H., 1976, SKADEGORARE ISKOGEN
   Ekelund H., 2001, 8A SKOGSST JONK
   Flower CE, 2015, ANNU REV PLANT BIOL, V66, P547, DOI 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-115540
   Glavendekic MM, 2010, ARCH BIOL SCI, V62, P1137, DOI 10.2298/ABS1004137G
   Harding S., 1998, RAPPORT SKOGFORSKN S, P1
   Jones P. D., 2013, TS320 CRU NCAS U E A
   Jönsson AM, 2012, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V166, P188, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.07.012
   Komonen A, 2011, J APPL ENTOMOL, V135, P132, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2010.01520.x
   Langstrom B, 2009, IUFRO FOREST INSECT
   Lekander B., 1954, SKOGSINSEKTERNAS UPP
   Lekander B., 1976, ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA FE, V32, P1
   Lekander M., 1950, SKOGSINSEKTERNAS UPP
   Liebhold A., 2011, Insect disturbance and climate change
   Loman JO, 2004, SWEDISH STAT YB FORE, P329
   Loyttyniemi K., 1979, FOLIA FOR, V395, P1
   Marini L, 2013, OIKOS, V122, P1768, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00431.x
   Meyer J. R., 2007, IMPACT INSECTS
   National Center for Atmospheric Research Staff, 2014, TS321 CRU NAT CTR AT
   Nilsson C, 2004, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V199, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.031
   Nilsson C., 2008, THESIS
   Nooten SS, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0085987
   North Carolina Forest Services, 2013, COMM FOR INS PESTS
   Örlander G, 1999, SCAND J FOREST RES, V14, P341, DOI 10.1080/02827589950152665
   Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, 2009, SWED FOR MOD REP ROY
   Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, 2015, FOR FOR SWED
   Sfa, 2014, STAT YB FOR 2014
   Stolte K.W., 1997, NATL TECHNICAL REPOR
   Swedish Forest Agency, 2014, SUST FOR MAN SWED
   Swedish National Forest Inventory, 2013, FOR STAT SWED NAT FO
   Tudoran M. M., 2015, THESIS
   Wermelinger B, 2004, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V202, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.018
NR 48
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 1
U2 67
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0378-1127
EI 1872-7042
J9 FOREST ECOL MANAG
JI For. Ecol. Manage.
PD DEC 1
PY 2016
VL 381
BP 347
EP 359
DI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.044
PG 13
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA EB6VC
UT WOS:000387522700033
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Buretic-Tomljanovic, A
   Giacometti, J
   Ostojic, S
   Kapovic, M
AF Buretic-Tomljanovic, Alena
   Giacometti, Jasminka
   Ostojic, Sasa
   Kapovic, Miljenko
TI Sex-specific differences of craniofacial traits in Croatia: The impact
   of environment in a small geographic area
SO ANNALS OF HUMAN BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE body height; craniofacial traits; environmental influence
ID POLYUNSATURATED FATTY-ACIDS; HUMAN-BODY SIZE; ANTHROPOMETRIC VARIATION;
   SECULAR TRENDS; CRANIOMETRIC VARIATION; CRANIAL FORM; GROWTH; HEIGHT;
   POPULATIONS; CHILDREN
AB Background: Craniometric variation in humans reflects different genetic and environmental influences. Long-term climatic adaptation is less likely to show an impact on size and shape variation in a small local area than at the global level.
   Aim: The aim of this work was to assess the contribution of the particular environmental factors to body height and craniofacial variability in a small geographic area of Croatia.
   Subjects and methods: A total of 632 subjects, aged 18-21, participated in the survey. Body height, head length, head breadth, head height, head circumference, cephalic index, morphological face height, face breadth, and facial index were analysed regarding geographic, climatic and dietary conditions in different regions of the country, and correlated with the specific climatic variables ( cumulative multiyear sunshine duration, cumulative multiyear average precipitation, multiyear average air temperatures) and calcium concentrations in drinking water. Significant differences between groups classified according to geographic, climatic or dietary affiliation, and the impact of the environmental predictors on the variation in the investigated traits were assessed using multiple forward stepwise regression analyses.
   Results: Higher body height measures in both sexes were significantly correlated with Mediterranean diet type. Mediterranean diet type also contributed to higher head length and head circumference measures in females. Cephalic index values correlated to geographic regions in both sexes, showing an increase from southern to eastern Croatia. In the same direction, head length significantly decreased in males and head breadth increased in females. Mediterranean climate was associated with higher and narrower faces in females. The analysis of the particular climatic variables did not reveal a significant influence on body height in either sex. Concurrently, climatic features influenced all craniofacial traits in females and only head length and facial index in males. Mediterranean climate, characterized by higher average sunshine duration, higher average precipitation and higher average air temperatures, was associated with longer, higher and narrower skulls, higher head circumference, lower cephalic index, and higher and narrower faces ( lower facial index). Calcium concentrations in drinking water did not correlate significantly with any dependent variable.
   Conclusion: A significant effect of environmental factors on body height and craniofacial variability was found in Croatian young adult population. This effect was more pronounced in females, revealing sex-specific craniofacial differentiation. However, the impact of environment was low and may explain only 1.0-7.32% variation of the investigated traits.
C1 Univ Rijeka, Dept Biol & Med Genet, Sch Med, Rijeka 51000, Croatia.
   Univ Rijeka, Dept Chem & Biochem, Sch Med, Rijeka 51000, Croatia.
C3 University of Rijeka; University of Rijeka
RP Buretic-Tomljanovic, A (corresponding author), Univ Rijeka, Dept Biol & Med Genet, Sch Med, Brace Branchetta 20, Rijeka 51000, Croatia.
EM alena@medri.hr
RI Buretić-Tomljanović, Alena/K-2056-2019; Giacometti,
   Jasminka/O-4456-2018; Buretic-Tomljanovic, Alena/S-3985-2018; Ostojic,
   Sasa/S-8968-2018; Kapovic, Miljenko/S-8310-2018
OI Giacometti, Jasminka/0000-0002-3388-4645; Buretic-Tomljanovic,
   Alena/0000-0002-9840-1245; Ostojic, Sasa/0000-0001-7134-4335; Kapovic,
   Miljenko/0000-0002-8466-1011
CR Adak Dipak Kumar, 2004, Anthropologischer Anzeiger, V62, P445
   ANGEL JL, 1982, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V58, P297, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330580308
   Barac L, 2003, EUR J HUM GENET, V11, P535, DOI 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200992
   Bharati S, 2005, ANN HUM BIOL, V32, P407, DOI 10.1080/03014460500097443
   Bharati S, 2001, AM J HUM BIOL, V13, P626, DOI 10.1002/ajhb.1101.abs
   Boas F., 1912, CHANGES BODILY FORM
   Buretic-Tomljanovic A, 2004, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V123, P91, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.10306
   Buretic-Tomljanovic A, 2006, AM J HUM BIOL, V18, P668, DOI 10.1002/ajhb.20536
   Cacciari E, 2002, EUR J CLIN NUTR, V56, P171, DOI 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601314
   Carels C E, 1998, Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd, V105, P423
   Castilho LV, 2001, ANN HUM BIOL, V28, P564, DOI 10.1080/03014460110045146
   Cole TJ, 2000, P NUTR SOC, V59, P317, DOI 10.1017/S0029665100000355
   Colic-Baric I, 2004, EUR J NUTR, V43, P169, DOI 10.1007/s00394-004-0455-5
   COLICBARIC I, 2000, FOOD TECHNOL BIOTECH, V38, P217
   Cordain L, 2005, AM J CLIN NUTR, V81, P341, DOI 10.1093/ajcn.81.2.341
   CROGNIER E, 1981, ANN HUM BIOL, V8, P99, DOI 10.1080/03014468100004841
   Danubio ME, 2003, ANN HUM BIOL, V30, P225, DOI 10.1080/0301446021000038116
   Das G, 2006, ARCH DIS CHILD, V91, P569, DOI 10.1136/adc.2005.077974
   Dawodu A, 1998, J BIOSOC SCI, V30, P431, DOI 10.1017/S0021932098004313
   DEFRIAS EC, 1999, SECULAR TREND GROWTH, V116, P83
   DEMEER K, 1993, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V90, P59, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330900105
   DEROUSSEAU CJ, 1987, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V73, P279, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330730302
   FELICIANO ES, 1994, J TROP PEDIATRICS, V40, P162, DOI 10.1093/tropej/40.3.162
   Fine John., 1983, EARLY MEDIEVAL BALKA
   Fredriks AM, 2000, PEDIATR RES, V47, P316, DOI 10.1203/00006450-200003000-00006
   FROMENT A, 1984, ANN HUM BIOL, V11, P189, DOI 10.1080/03014468400007061
   Gonzalez-Jose RG, 2005, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V128, P757, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.20161
   Gravlee CC, 2003, AM ANTHROPOL, V105, P125, DOI 10.1525/aa.2003.105.1.125
   GUGLIELMINOMATESSI CR, 1979, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V50, P549, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330500407
   GULDESCU S, 1967, HIST MEDIEVAL CROATI, P287
   Gyenis G, 1994, Anthropol Anz, V52, P149
   Gyenis G, 2004, ECON HUM BIOL, V2, P321, DOI 10.1016/j.ehb.2004.03.001
   Hanihara T, 2003, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V121, P241, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.10233
   Hauspie RC, 1996, HORM RES, V45, P8, DOI 10.1159/000184841
   Hoppa RD, 1998, ANN HUM BIOL, V25, P553, DOI 10.1080/03014469800006792
   Huggare J, 1993, Proc Finn Dent Soc, V89, P95
   Jantz RL, 2000, AM J HUM BIOL, V12, P327, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(200005/06)12:3<327::AID-AJHB3>3.0.CO;2-1
   Klaic N., 1971, POVIJEST HRVATA RANO
   KONIGSBERG LW, 1995, HUM BIOL, V67, P481
   KOVAC I, 1984, GI ADJ, V21, P37
   Larsen CS, 2003, J NUTR, V133, p3893S, DOI 10.1093/jn/133.11.3893S
   LEUTENEGGER W, 1989, Zeitschrift fuer Morphologie und Anthropologie, V78, P15
   Lieberman DE, 2000, J HUM EVOL, V38, P291, DOI 10.1006/jhev.1999.0335
   Liu YZ, 2004, ANN HUM GENET, V68, P472, DOI 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.00117.x
   Livshits G, 2002, ANN HUM BIOL, V29, P271, DOI 10.1080/03014460110085322
   MAGOCSI PR, 1993, HIST ATLAS E CENTRAL, V1, P6
   MAGOCSI PR, 1993, HIST ATLAS E CENTRAL, V1, P25
   MAGOCSI PR, 1993, HIST ATLAS E CENTRAL, V1, P35
   Peter Inga, 2004, Anthropol Anz, V62, P61
   Post E, 1999, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V96, P4467, DOI 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4467
   PREBEG Z, 1995, ANN HUM BIOL, V22, P99, DOI 10.1080/03014469500003762
   PREBEG Z, 2002, LIJEC VJESN, V3, P124
   Relethford JH, 2002, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V118, P393, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.10079
   Relethford JH, 2004, AM J HUM BIOL, V16, P379, DOI 10.1002/ajhb.20045
   RELETHFORD JH, 1994, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V95, P53, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330950105
   Rosales-Lopez A, 1992, Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex, V49, P730
   Roseman CC, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P12824, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0402637101
   Ross AH, 2004, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V124, P73, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.10339
   Ruff C, 2002, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V31, P211, DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085407
   Sanna E, 2000, AM J HUM BIOL, V12, P782, DOI 10.1002/1520-6300(200011/12)12:6<782::AID-AJHB6>3.0.CO;2-L
   Schousboe K, 2004, INT J OBESITY, V28, P39, DOI 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802524
   Silventoinen K, 2003, TWIN RES, V6, P399, DOI 10.1375/twin.6.5.399
   SISIC F, 1925, HIST CROATIA TIME NA
   Skaric-Juric T, 2003, COLLEGIUM ANTROPOL, V27, P135
   Slaus M, 2000, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V111, P193, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(200002)111:2<193::AID-AJPA6>3.3.CO;2-S
   Slaus M, 2004, CROAT MED J, V45, P434
   Slaus M., 1998, STAROHRVATSKA PROSVJ, V25, P81
   SLAUS M, 2000, OPUSCULA ARCHAEOLOGI, V23, P273
   SMOLEJNARANCIC N, 1994, HUM BIOL, V66, P275
   Sparks CS, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P14636, DOI 10.1073/pnas.222389599
   Tolk HV, 2000, COLLEGIUM ANTROPOL, V24, P267
   VERCAUTEREN M, 1990, HUM BIOL, V62, P681
   Vitale K, 2002, HUM BIOL, V74, P545, DOI 10.1353/hub.2002.0049
   Vitart V, 2006, EUR J HUM GENET, V14, P478, DOI 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201589
   Wade T D, 2001, Twin Res, V4, P260, DOI 10.1375/1369052012489
   Watkins BA, 2000, J NUTR, V130, P2274, DOI 10.1093/jn/130.9.2274
   Watkins BA, 2001, EXP BIOL MED, V226, P485, DOI 10.1177/153537020122600601
   Weninger M, 1979, Anthropol Anz, V37, P18
   Wescott DJ, 2005, DEV PRIMATOL-PROG PR, P231, DOI 10.1007/0-387-27614-9_10
   WOLPOFF MH, 1968, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V29, P405, DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330290315
   Yonei T, 1999, BONE, V24, P145, DOI 10.1016/S8756-3282(98)00162-8
   Zellner K, 1999, Anthropol Anz, V57, P147
NR 82
TC 28
Z9 33
U1 0
U2 17
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0301-4460
J9 ANN HUM BIOL
JI Ann. Hum. Biol.
PY 2007
VL 34
IS 3
BP 296
EP 314
DI 10.1080/03014460701211017
PG 19
WC Anthropology; Biology; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Anthropology; Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Other Topics; Public,
   Environmental & Occupational Health
GA 186UC
UT WOS:000247802800003
PM 17612861
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Mehlenbacher, SA
AF Mehlenbacher, S. A.
BE Varvaro, L
   Franco, S
TI Genetic Resources for Hazelnut: State of the Art and Future Perspectives
SO VII INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON HAZELNUT
SE Acta Horticulturae
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT 7th International Congress on Hazelnut
CY OCT 31, 2009
CL Viterbo, ITALY
DE Corylus; filbert; breeding; germplasm characterization
ID EASTERN FILBERT BLIGHT; CORYLUS-AVELLANA L.; MICROSATELLITE MARKERS;
   CULTIVARS; DNA
AB World production of the European hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) is based primarily on selections from the wild. Breeding programs are developing new cultivars for the kernel and in-shell markets, but efforts are limited. To date, the hazelnut breeding program at Oregon State University has released six cultivars, eight pollinizers, and two ornamentals. Micropropagation allows routine, rapid multiplication of new cultivars. C. avellana is highly polymorphic, and cultivars have been collected and preserved in several genebanks. Collections in Corvallis house more than 900 accessions of Corylus, of which 500 are C. avellana. Recent introductions include germplasm from Turkey and the former Soviet Union. Of more than 500 known cultivars, only about 20 are worthy of consideration for commercial production. Apple mosaic virus is common in cultivars from some regions, but infected trees often show no symptoms. Very strict plant quarantine regulations designed to prevent the spread of eastern filbert blight, caused by Anisogramma anomala, also prevent the sharing of improved cultivars. Genetic studies have identified several simply inherited traits. Most economically important traits are quantitative with moderate to high heritabilities. Climatic adaptation is rarely a concern in the major production areas, but expansion of hazelnut plantings into marginal areas will require the development of adapted cultivars from diverse germplasm and identification of suitable pollinizers. Genetic diversity in other species will be useful in breeding efforts for marginal areas. Studies at the DNA level have been useful in clarifying the taxonomy of Corylus and related genera. More than 150 microsatellite markers have been developed and placed on the linkage map where they serve as anchor loci, and many also amplify Betula. Characterization with microsatellite markers showed that 72 of 270 accessions in the Corvallis collections were duplicates, and assigned most accessions to one of four major geographic groups: Central European, Black Sea, English and Spanish-Italian. Eastern filbert blight is a major concern in North America. Several sources with high levels of resistance have been identified and are being used in breeding, with selection facilitated by DNA markers. A bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library will allow map-based cloning of important genes, including eastern filbert blight resistance from 'Gasaway' and the S-locus that controls pollen-stigma incompatibility. Public databases now include very few Corylus sequences. EST sequences from other genera and species in the order Fagales may be useful for studies in Corylus, as synteny of the genomes is expected. Hazelnut is amenable to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, with regeneration most successful if explants are from germinating seeds or very young seedlings.
C1 Oregon State Univ, Dept Hort, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA.
C3 Oregon State University
RP Mehlenbacher, SA (corresponding author), Oregon State Univ, Dept Hort, 4107 Ag & Life Sci Bldg, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA.
CR [Anonymous], ACTA HORTIC
   Aramburu J, 2000, PLANT PATHOL, V49, P423, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2000.00477.x
   Bassil NV, 2005, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V130, P543, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.130.4.543
   Boccacci P, 2006, GENOME, V49, P598, DOI 10.1139/G06-017
   Boccacci P, 2005, MOL ECOL NOTES, V5, P934, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01121.x
   Chen H, 2007, HORTSCIENCE, V42, P466, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.42.3.466
   Erdogan V, 2000, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V125, P489, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.125.4.489
   Erdogan V, 2000, SYST BOT, V25, P727, DOI 10.2307/2666730
   Erdogan V, 2002, Herb J Syst Bot, V9, P83
   Gökirmak T, 2009, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V56, P147, DOI 10.1007/s10722-008-9352-8
   LAGERSTEDT HB, 1990, ANN RPT N NUT GROWER, V81, P60
   Lunde CF, 2000, HORTSCIENCE, V35, P729, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.35.4.729
   Mehlenbacher SA, 2006, HORTSCIENCE, V41, P482, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.41.2.482
   MEHLENBACHER SA, 1997, ACTA HORTIC, V445, P167
   Yao Q, 2000, PLANT BREEDING, V119, P369, DOI 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2000.00524.x
NR 15
TC 17
Z9 23
U1 1
U2 3
PU INT SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
PI LEUVEN 1
PA PO BOX 500, 3001 LEUVEN 1, BELGIUM
SN 0567-7572
BN 978-90-6605-712-8
J9 ACTA HORTIC
PY 2009
VL 845
BP 33
EP 38
PG 6
WC Plant Sciences; Horticulture
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Plant Sciences; Agriculture
GA BAW16
UT WOS:000305695500001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Chen, J
   Shi, XY
   Gu, L
   Wu, GY
   Su, TH
   Wang, HM
   Kim, JS
   Zhang, LP
   Xiong, LH
AF Chen, Jie
   Shi, Xinyan
   Gu, Lei
   Wu, Guiyang
   Su, Tianhua
   Wang, Hui-Min
   Kim, Jong-Suk
   Zhang, Liping
   Xiong, Lihua
TI Impacts of climate warming on global floods and their implication to
   current flood defense standards
SO JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Global warming; Global climate models; Floods; Flood protection
   standards
ID 2 DEGREES-C; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; PROJECTED INCREASES; STREAMFLOW
   EXTREMES; RUNOFF; RISK; PERFORMANCE; ENSEMBLE; UNCERTAINTIES;
   SENSITIVITY
AB Floods usually threaten human lives and cause serious economic losses, which can be more severe with global warming. Therefore, it is a salient challenge to find out how global flood characteristic changes and whether current flood protection standards will face more pressures. This study aims to characterize changes in global floods and explicit flood defense pressures in warming climates of 1.5-3.0 degrees C above pre-industrial levels by running four well-calibrated lumped hydrological models using bias-corrected Global Climate Model (GCM) simulations for 9045 watersheds worldwide. The results show that global warming from 1.5 to 3.0 degrees C has increasingly dominated all continents, with amplification effects on changes of flood frequency and magnitude. Southeast Eurasia, Africa, and South America are hotspots of changes for significant proportions of watersheds with larger flood patterns and greater changing extents than others. For example, for the 3.0 degrees C warming period under the combination of shared socioeconomic pathway 2 and representative concentration pathway 4.5 (SSP245) scenario, the regionally averaged 50-year flood magnitude will increase by 25.6 %, 30.6 %, and 16.4 % for these regions, respectively. The increases in occurrence and magnitude indicate that current flood protection standards will face increasing pressures in future warming climates. The design-level flood frequency is projected to increase for about 47 %, 55 %, 70 %, and 74 % of watersheds in 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 degrees C warming periods under the SSP245 scenario. However, large uncertainty are observed for the change of flood characteristics dominated by GCMs and their interactions with SSP scenarios and hydrological models. This study implies that the current flood defense standards should be enhanced and climate adaptation and mitigation strategies should be proposed to cope the change of future flood.Plain language summary: Floods usually threaten human lives and cause serious economic losses, which can be more severe in the context of global warming. It is a salient challenge to find out how global flood risk changes and whether current flood protection standards will face more pressures. This study aims to characterize changes in global floods and explicit flood defense pressures in warming climates of 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 degrees C above pre-industrial levels. Here we show that amplification effects of higher air temperature on the range of changes in flood frequency and magnitude are projected. Southeast Eurasia, Africa, and South America are hotspots of changes for significant proportions of watersheds with larger flood patterns and greater changing extents than others. Most watersheds worldwide is likely to face increasing flood defense pressures in warming climates. Our findings could improve the understanding of future flood conditions under the warming climates and provide information to mitigation and adaptation policymaking.
C1 [Chen, Jie; Shi, Xinyan; Wu, Guiyang; Su, Tianhua; Kim, Jong-Suk; Zhang, Liping; Xiong, Lihua] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn Sc, Wuhan, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Jie; Shi, Xinyan; Wu, Guiyang; Su, Tianhua; Kim, Jong-Suk; Zhang, Liping; Xiong, Lihua] Wuhan Univ, Hubei Key Lab Water Syst Sci Sponge City Construct, Wuhan, Peoples R China.
   [Gu, Lei] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil & Hydraul Engn, Wuhan, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Hui-Min] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore, Singapore.
C3 Wuhan University; Wuhan University; Huazhong University of Science &
   Technology; National University of Singapore
RP Chen, J (corresponding author), Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn Sc, Wuhan, Peoples R China.; Gu, L (corresponding author), Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil & Hydraul Engn, Wuhan, Peoples R China.
EM jiechen@whu.edu.cn; 2020210216@hust.edu.cn
RI Wu, Guiyang/GWQ-8314-2022; Gu, Lei/A-7052-2011; wang,
   huimin/AAB-7888-2022; Kim, Jong-Suk/ABC-9255-2021
OI Kim, Jong-Suk/0000-0002-5274-5085; Xiong, Lihua/0000-0001-6990-2414; Su,
   Tianhua/0000-0001-9227-5084; Gu, Lei/0000-0001-8291-9894
FU National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0603704];
   National Natural Science Foundation of China [U2240201, 52079093];
   Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation (111
   Project) - Ministry of Education; State Administration of Foreign
   Experts Affairs P.R. China;  [B18037]
FX This work was partially supported by the National Key Research and
   Development Program of China (No. 2017YFA0603704) , the National Natural
   Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U2240201, 52079093) , and the
   Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation (111
   Project) funded by Ministry of Education and State Administration of
   Foreign Experts Affairs P.R. China (Grant No. B18037) . The authors
   would like to thank the World Climate Research Program Working Group on
   Coupled Modelling and the climate modeling institutions (listed in Table
   S1) for producing and making the datasets available.
CR Aich V, 2014, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V18, P1305, DOI 10.5194/hess-18-1305-2014
   Arsenault R, 2020, SCI DATA, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41597-020-00583-2
   Arsenault R, 2017, J HYDROL ENG, V22, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001489
   Arsenault R, 2015, J HYDROL, V529, P754, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.001
   Asadieh B, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P5863, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-5863-2017
   Beck HE, 2016, WATER RESOUR RES, V52, P3599, DOI 10.1002/2015WR018247
   Berghuijs WR, 2019, WATER RESOUR RES, V55, P4582, DOI [10.1029/2019WR024841, 10.1029/2019wr024841]
   Berghuijs WR, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P4382, DOI 10.1002/2016GL068070
   Boots B., 2009, Spatial tessellations: concepts and applications of Voronoi diagrams
   Bosshard T, 2013, WATER RESOUR RES, V49, P1523, DOI 10.1029/2011WR011533
   Bubeck P, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V155, P19, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02434-5
   Chegwidden OS, 2019, EARTHS FUTURE, V7, P623, DOI 10.1029/2018EF001047
   Chen J, 2011, WATER RESOUR RES, V47, DOI 10.1029/2011WR010602
   Chen J, 2013, J HYDROL, V479, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.062
   Cheng LY, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V127, P353, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1254-5
   Chiew F., 1991, NATL C PUBLICATION
   Chiew F. H. S., 2002, Mathematical models of small watershed hydrology and applications, P335
   Coles S., 2001, An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-3675-0
   Dankers R., 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA
   de Moel H, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P620, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.005
   Degefu MA, 2019, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V19, P1923, DOI 10.1007/s10113-019-01510-x
   Döll P, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aab792
   Dottori F, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P781, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0257-z
   DUAN QY, 1992, WATER RESOUR RES, V28, P1015, DOI 10.1029/91WR02985
   Fischer EM, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P560, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2617
   Foster G, 2011, ENVIRON RES LETT, V6, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044022
   Fowler K, 2018, WATER RESOUR RES, V54, P9812, DOI 10.1029/2018WR023989
   Gosling SN, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V141, P577, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1773-3
   Gowda PH, 2012, T ASABE, V55, P1345
   Gu L, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2020EF001718
   Gu L, 2020, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V24, P451, DOI 10.5194/hess-24-451-2020
   Guo Q, 2019, CLIM DYNAM, V53, P3603, DOI 10.1007/s00382-019-04729-w
   Gupta HV, 2009, J HYDROL, V377, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003
   Held IM, 2006, J CLIMATE, V19, P5686, DOI 10.1175/JCLI3990.1
   Hirabayashi Y, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P816, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1911, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1911]
   Huang SC, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aae94b
   Huo R., 2022, PSYCHOL MED, V613
   IMAN RL, 1982, COMMUN STAT B-SIMUL, V11, P311, DOI 10.1080/03610918208812265
   Jevrejeva S, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aacc76
   Ji P, 2020, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V24, P5439, DOI 10.5194/hess-24-5439-2020
   Jones RN, 2006, ADV WATER RESOUR, V29, P1419, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.11.001
   Jongman B, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P264, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2124, 10.1038/nclimate2124]
   Kling H, 2012, J HYDROL, V424, P264, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.011
   Knoben WJM, 2019, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V23, P4323, DOI 10.5194/hess-23-4323-2019
   Krysanova V, 2018, HYDROLOG SCI J, V63, P696, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2018.1446214
   Li KL, 2022, WATER RESOUR RES, V58, DOI 10.1029/2021WR031557
   Li Kailong., 2022, Water Resources Research, V58
   Liu WB, 2021, WATER RESOUR RES, V57, DOI 10.1029/2020WR028830
   Mallakpour I, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P2130, DOI 10.1029/2018GL081888
   Mann HB, 1945, ECONOMETRICA, V13, P245, DOI 10.2307/1907187
   Martel JL, 2017, INT J ENG EDUC, V33, P1307
   Marx A, 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V22, P1017, DOI 10.5194/hess-22-1017-2018
   Morice CP, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V117, DOI 10.1029/2011JD017187
   Musselman KN, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P808, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0236-4
   O'Neill BC, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P3461, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016
   Oudin L, 2005, J HYDROL, V303, P290, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.026
   Perrin C, 2003, J HYDROL, V279, P275, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7
   Qi WY, 2021, J HYDROL, V601, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126680
   Riahi K, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009
   Roudier P, 2016, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V135, P341, DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1570-4
   Scussolini P, 2016, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V16, P1049, DOI 10.5194/nhess-16-1049-2016
   Shi XY, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V766, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142665
   Smith KA, 2019, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V23, P3247, DOI 10.5194/hess-23-3247-2019
   Su BD, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P10600, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1802129115
   Troin M, 2016, J HYDROL, V540, P588, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.055
   UNEP U., 2021, EMISS GAP REP 2021
   UNFCCC, 2015, PAR AGR
   Valéry A, 2014, J HYDROL, V517, P1176, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.058
   Vautard R, 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034006
   Veldkamp TIE, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aab96f
   Vormoor K, 2015, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V19, P913, DOI 10.5194/hess-19-913-2015
   Wang HM, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2020EF001602
   Wang XX, 2017, SCI BULL, V62, P1673, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2017.11.004
   Ward PJ, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P712, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2742
   Wei X, 2021, J ENVIRON INFORM, V37, P153, DOI 10.3808/jei.202000436
   Wilby RL, 2006, WATER RESOUR RES, V42, DOI 10.1029/2005WR004065
   Winsemius HC, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P381, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2893, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2893]
   Yamazaki D, 2011, WATER RESOUR RES, V47, DOI 10.1029/2010WR009726
   Zhang SB, 2022, INT J CLIMATOL, V42, P507, DOI 10.1002/joc.7257
   Zhang YQ, 2016, J HYDROMETEOROL, V17, P995, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0107.1
   Zhang YQ, 2009, WATER RESOUR RES, V45, DOI 10.1029/2008WR007504
   Zhao R. J., 1980, IAHS AISH PUBLICATIO, V129, P351
NR 82
TC 24
Z9 25
U1 28
U2 99
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0022-1694
EI 1879-2707
J9 J HYDROL
JI J. Hydrol.
PD MAR
PY 2023
VL 618
AR 129236
DI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129236
EA FEB 2023
PG 15
WC Engineering, Civil; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Geology; Water Resources
GA 9N0VA
UT WOS:000942636700001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Ozbay, G
   Sriharan, S
   Fan, C
AF Ozbay, Gulnihal
   Sriharan, Shobha
   Fan, Chunlei
BE Chova, LG
   Martinez, AL
   Torres, IC
TI ENHANCING ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CURRICULUM: CLIMATE CHANGE AND
   ADAPTATION STUDIES THROUGH EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATIONS VIA
   VIDEOCONFERENCING, E-LEARNING, AND INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN AUSTRALIA
SO INTED2014: 8TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT
   CONFERENCE
SE INTED Proceedings
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT 8th International Technology, Education and Development Conference
   (INTED)
CY MAR 10-12, 2014
CL Valencia, SPAIN
DE Climate change education; effective learning; E-learning; video
   conferencing climate education; international climate change education
AB To enhance the teaching of Environmental Science at Virginia State University (VSU) and its partner institutions (Delaware State University-DSU and Morgan State University-MSU) in the Mid-Atlantic Region, the course on climate change and adaptation studies was developed and offered in 2013. This course was designed to include information on the physical basis for the earth's climate system and current climate change instruction modules by the American Meteorological Society (AMS) and historic climate information (NOAA Climate Services, U.S. and World Weather Data, NCAR Climate Model, NASA Climate Model and NCAR Community Earth System Model). By using the Global Seminar as a Model, the faculty members (Dr. Shobha Sriharan, VSU, Dr. Gulnihal Ozbay, DSU, and Dr. Chunlei Fan, MSU) at the collaborating institutions worked in teams to engage students in communications via videoconferencing on climate change throughout the courses which included Contemporary Global Studies and Climate Change and Adaptation Response Science at VSU, Sustainable Agriculture, Introduction to Environmental Sciences and Climatology at DSU, and an Ecology and Adaptation course at MSU. This interactive and innovative instruction is the outcome of the joint effort of several educators (S. Sriharan, G. Ozbay, and C. Fan) in engaging minority students of VSU, DSU, and MSU in the Study Abroad Program through their participation in the course Climate Change and Course (ENS 310) taught by Professor Richard Warrick at the University of Sunshine Coast (USC), Queensland, Australia. The students examined various extreme scenarios due to climate change tcould potentially occur by the year 2100 by using two modeling programs (SimCLIM and TrainCLIM) from CLIMSystems. The students earned three credits for their successful completion of this course. In addition, the above-mentioned educators also learned to use SimCLIM software to demonstrate the impact of weather change on soils, water, and plants across different global regions at USC.
   The partnership between VSU, DSU, and MSU has enriched the environmental science education by preparing students to:
   (1) know how to gather information about climate and weather, and how to distinguish credible from non-credible scientific sources on the subject,
   (2) communicate about climate and climate change in a meaningful way, and
   (3) make scientifically informed and responsible decisions regarding actions that may affect climate.
   Further, the instructional delivery system via the E-learning community is planned to promote effective learning of climate related science through the Blackboard system which is integrated with the National Climate Adaptation and Mitigation E-Learning (CAMEL) community which was created by NCSE through climate change education grants from NASA and NSF. The offering of the newly-developed climate course has increased the capacity of the faculty to teach team building and critical thinking skills, and prepare students to fully capitalize on the power of teamwork for meeting the needs of environmental and agricultural professionals/employers.
C1 [Ozbay, Gulnihal] Delaware State Univ, Dover, DE 19901 USA.
   [Sriharan, Shobha] Virginia State Univ, Petersburg, VA 23806 USA.
   [Fan, Chunlei] Morgan State Univ, Baltimore, MD 21239 USA.
C3 Delaware State University; Virginia State University; Morgan State
   University
RP Ozbay, G (corresponding author), Delaware State Univ, Dover, DE 19901 USA.
CR AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 1990, SCI ALL AM ONL
   AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2013, PROJ 2061 LEARN GOAL
   [Anonymous], 2013, Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses
   Bean J.C., 1996, ENGAGING IDEAS PROFE
   Cannon A., CASE STUDY CLI UNPUB
   Conole G., 2004, REPORT EFFETIVENESS
   FAU (Florida Atlantic University) College of Business, 2013, EFF TEACH US VID C N
   Global Seminar, 2009, LEARN COMM
   Gyorke A., 2007, FACULTY GUIDE TEACHI
   Nancarrow C., 2013, 3 4 1 OVERVIEW EFFEC
   Wiggins G, 2005, UNDERSTANDING DESIGN
NR 11
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 2
U2 22
PU IATED-INT ASSOC TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION A& DEVELOPMENT
PI VALENICA
PA LAURI VOLPI 6, VALENICA, BURJASSOT 46100, SPAIN
SN 2340-1079
BN 978-84-616-8412-0
J9 INTED PROC
PY 2014
BP 1
EP 10
PG 10
WC Education & Educational Research
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Science &amp; Humanities (CPCI-SSH)
SC Education & Educational Research
GA BE0SN
UT WOS:000366835100001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Erdos, L
   Török, P
   Veldman, JW
   Bátori, Z
   Bede-Fazekas, A
   Magnes, M
   Kröel-Dulay, G
   Tölgyesi, C
AF Erdos, Laszlo
   Torok, Peter
   Veldman, Joseph W.
   Batori, Zoltan
   Bede-Fazekas, Akos
   Magnes, Martin
   Kroel-Dulay, Gyorgy
   Tolgyesi, Csaba
TI How climate, topography, soils, herbivores, and fire control
   forest-grassland coexistence in the Eurasian forest-steppe
SO BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
LA English
DT Article
DE biome transition; old-growth grassland; spatiotemporal heterogeneity;
   tree-grass coexistence; topography; soil; herbivory; fire
ID LATE-HOLOCENE VEGETATION; SPECIES COMPOSITION; EUROPEAN RUSSIA; TROPICAL
   FOREST; HUMAN IMPACT; WOODY COVER; NORTHERN; HISTORY; DYNAMICS; SAVANNA
AB Recent advances in ecology and biogeography demonstrate the importance of fire and large herbivores - and challenge the primacy of climate - to our understanding of the distribution, stability, and antiquity of forests and grasslands. Among grassland ecologists, particularly those working in savannas of the seasonally dry tropics, an emerging fire-herbivore paradigm is generally accepted to explain grass dominance in climates and on soils that would otherwise permit development of closed-canopy forests. By contrast, adherents of the climate-soil paradigm, particularly foresters working in the humid tropics or temperate latitudes, tend to view fire and herbivores as disturbances, often human-caused, which damage forests and reset succession. Towards integration of these two paradigms, we developed a series of conceptual models to explain the existence of an extensive temperate forest-grassland mosaic that occurs within a 4.7 million km(2) belt spanning from central Europe through eastern Asia. The Eurasian forest-steppe is reminiscent of many regions globally where forests and grasslands occur side-by-side with stark boundaries. Our conceptual models illustrate that if mean climate was the only factor, forests should dominate in humid continental regions and grasslands should prevail in semi-arid regions, but that extensive mosaics would not occur. By contrast, conceptual models that also integrate climate variability, soils, topography, herbivores, and fire depict how these factors collectively expand suitable conditions for forests and grasslands, such that grasslands may occur in more humid regions and forests in more arid regions than predicted by mean climate alone. Furthermore, boundaries between forests and grasslands are reinforced by vegetation-fire, vegetation-herbivore, and vegetation-microclimate feedbacks, which limit tree establishment in grasslands and promote tree survival in forests. Such feedbacks suggest that forests and grasslands of the Eurasian forest-steppe are governed by ecological dynamics that are similar to those hypothesised to maintain boundaries between tropical forests and savannas. Unfortunately, the grasslands of the Eurasian forest-steppe are sometimes misinterpreted as deforested or otherwise degraded vegetation. In fact, the grasslands of this region provide valuable ecosystem services, support a high diversity of plants and animals, and offer critical habitat for endangered large herbivores. We suggest that a better understanding of the fundamental ecological controls that permit forest-grassland coexistence could help us prioritise conservation and restoration of the Eurasian forest-steppe for biodiversity, climate adaptation, and pastoral livelihoods. Currently, these goals are being undermined by tree-planting campaigns that view the open grasslands as opportunities for afforestation. Improved understanding of the interactive roles of climate variability, soils, topography, fire, and herbivores will help scientists and policymakers recognise the antiquity of the grasslands of the Eurasian forest-steppe.
C1 [Erdos, Laszlo; Bede-Fazekas, Akos; Kroel-Dulay, Gyorgy] Ctr Ecol Res, Inst Ecol & Bot, Alkotmany Utca 2-4, H-2163 Vacratot, Hungary.
   [Erdos, Laszlo; Torok, Peter] MTA DE Lendulet Funct & Restorat Ecol Res Grp, Egyet Ter 1, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
   [Torok, Peter] Univ Debrecen, Dept Ecol, Egyet Ter 1, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
   [Torok, Peter] Polish Acad Sci, Ctr Biol Divers Conservat Powsin, Bot Garden, Prawdziwka St 2, PL-02973 Warsaw, Poland.
   [Veldman, Joseph W.] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Ecol & Conservat Biol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA.
   [Batori, Zoltan] Univ Szeged, Dept Ecol, Kozep Fasor 52, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.
   [Bede-Fazekas, Akos] Eotvos Lorand Univ, Dept Environm & Landscape Geog, Pazmany Peter Setany 1-C, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary.
   [Magnes, Martin] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Inst Biol, Holteigasse 6, A-8010 Graz, Austria.
   [Tolgyesi, Csaba] MTA SZTE Momentum Appl Ecol Res Grp, Kozep Fasor 52, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.
C3 Hungarian Academy of Sciences; Hungarian Research Network; HUN-REN
   Centre for Ecological Research; University of Debrecen; Polish Academy
   of Sciences; Texas A&M University System; Texas A&M University College
   Station; Szeged University; Eotvos Lorand University; University of Graz
RP Erdos, L (corresponding author), Ctr Ecol Res, Inst Ecol & Bot, Alkotmany Utca 2-4, H-2163 Vacratot, Hungary.; Erdos, L (corresponding author), MTA DE Lendulet Funct & Restorat Ecol Res Grp, Egyet Ter 1, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
EM erdos.laszlo@ecolres.hu
RI Bátori, Zoltán/M-3399-2018; Bede-Fazekas, Ákos/J-1636-2012; Peter,
   Torok/C-5514-2008
OI Batori, Zoltan/0000-0001-9915-5309
FU National Research, Development and Innovation Office [FK 134384, K
   119225, K 137573, K 124796, PD 132131]; New National Excellence
   Programme of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology from the source
   of the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund
   [UNKP-21-5-SZTE-591, UNKP21-5-SZTE-581]; Janos Bolyai Research
   Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences; USDA-NIFA Sustainable
   Agricultural Systems Grant [2019-68012-29819]; USDA-NIFA
   McIntire-Stennis Project [1016880]; National Science Foundation
   [DEB-1931232]
FX This work was supported by the National Research, Development and
   Innovation Office (FK 134384 to L. E., K 119225 and K 137573 to P. T., K
   124796 to Z. B., and PD 132131 to C. T.), the New National Excellence
   Programme of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology from the source
   of the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund
   (UNKP-21-5-SZTE-591 to C. T. and UNKP21-5-SZTE-581 to Z. B.), and the
   J~anos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
   (to L. E., Z. B., and C. T.). J. W. V. is supported by USDA-NIFA
   Sustainable Agricultural Systems Grant 2019-68012-29819, USDA-NIFA
   McIntire-Stennis Project 1016880, and the National Science Foundation
   under award DEB-1931232.
CR Agam N, 2006, J ARID ENVIRON, V65, P572, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.09.004
   Alkemade Rob, 2013, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, V110, P20900, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1011013108
   Anenkhonov OA, 2015, ECOL INDIC, V57, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.012
   [Anonymous], 2012, Ecotones between forest and grassland, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-3797-0_4
   [Anonymous], 2012, Eurasian Steppes. Ecological Problems and Livelihoods in a Changing World. Plant and Vegetation, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-3886-7_3
   [Anonymous], 1993, Ecosystems of the World
   [Anonymous], 1999, ANN BOT-COENOL PLANT
   Archer S. R., 2009, Wild rangelands: conserving wildlife while maintaining livestock in semi-arid ecosystems, P53, DOI 10.1002/9781444317091.ch4
   Archer SR, 2017, SPRINGER SER ENV MAN, P25, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46709-2_2
   Asner GP, 2004, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V29, P261, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.29.062403.102142
   Augustine DJ, 2004, J APPL ECOL, V41, P45, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2004.00864.x
   Baker JCA, 2021, NAT GEOSCI, V14, P458, DOI 10.1038/s41561-021-00787-0
   Barrett K, 2020, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111539
   Bátori Z, 2018, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V27, P1011, DOI 10.1007/s10531-017-1477-7
   Baudena M, 2010, J ECOL, V98, P74, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01588.x
   BEARD JS, 1953, ECOL MONOGR, V23, P149, DOI 10.2307/1948518
   Boch S, 2019, FLORA, V258, DOI 10.1016/j.flora.2019.151444
   Bond WJ, 2019, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V34, P963, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2019.08.003
   Bond WJ, 2010, BIOL CONSERV, V143, P2395, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.012
   Bond WJ, 2008, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V39, P641, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173411
   Bond WJ, 2019, OPEN ECOSYSTEMS: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION BEYOND THE FOREST EDGE, P1
   Borhidi A., 2004, TILIA, V12, P199
   Borhidi A., 2012, Plant Communities of Hungary
   Bredenkamp GJ, 2002, PLANT ECOL, V163, P209, DOI 10.1023/A:1020957807971
   Breshears DD, 2006, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V4, P96, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0096:TGCTIE]2.0.CO;2
   Breshears DD, 1997, ECOL APPL, V7, P1201, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[1201:OIHISR]2.0.CO;2
   Cao SX, 2008, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V42, P1826, DOI 10.1021/es0870597
   Chibilyov A.A., 2002, The Physical Geography of Northern Eurasia, P248
   Cook-Patton SC, 2020, NATURE, V585, P545, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2686-x
   Cseresnyés I, 2011, ACTA BOT CROAT, V70, P157, DOI 10.2478/v10184-010-0022-5
   D'Odorico P, 2013, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V22, P364, DOI 10.1111/geb.12000
   Dass P, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aacb39
   Davies-Colley RJ, 2000, NEW ZEAL J ECOL, V24, P111
   Deák B, 2016, BIOL CONSERV, V204, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.023
   deVries MFW, 1996, VEGETATIO, V122, P111, DOI 10.1007/BF00044694
   Dulamsuren C, 2005, ANN BOT FENN, V42, P411
   Dulamsuren C, 2005, APPL VEG SCI, V8, P149, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2005.tb00640.x
   Dulamsuren C, 2008, PLANT ECOL, V195, P143, DOI 10.1007/s11258-007-9311-z
   Dulamsuren C, 2013, PLANT ECOL, V214, P139, DOI 10.1007/s11258-012-0152-z
   Dulamsuren C, 2009, TREE PHYSIOL, V29, P99, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpn008
   Dulamsuren C, 2009, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V66, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.12.020
   Erdos L., 2014, TISCIA (Szeged), V40, P11
   Erdos L, 2015, COMMUNITY ECOL, V16, P95, DOI 10.1556/168.2015.16.1.11
   Erdos L, 2014, ECOL COMPLEX, V17, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.11.004
   Erdos L, 2021, EUR J FOREST RES, V140, P589, DOI 10.1007/s10342-020-01344-x
   Erdos L, 2019, TUEXENIA, P357, DOI 10.14471/2019.39.007
   Erdos L, 2019, PLANT ECOL, V220, P279, DOI 10.1007/s11258-019-00913-4
   Erdos L, 2018, APPL VEG SCI, V21, P345, DOI 10.1111/avsc.12382
   Erdos L, 2014, ACTA BOT CROAT, V73, P63, DOI 10.2478/botcro-2013-0009
   Evans P, 2017, ENVIRON REV, V25, P423, DOI 10.1139/er-2017-0009
   Feurdean A, 2013, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V81, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.09.014
   Feurdean A, 2018, BIOL CONSERV, V228, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.09.022
   Gantuya B, 2019, J ETHNOBIOL ETHNOMED, V15, DOI 10.1186/s13002-019-0328-x
   Goncharenko Igor, 2019, Thaiszia, V29, P191, DOI 10.33542/TJB2019-2-05
   Hais M, 2016, J ARID ENVIRON, V135, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.08.011
   Hao Q, 2014, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V409, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.05.020
   Hauck M, 2008, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V62, P351, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.10.025
   Hauck M, 2012, FLORA, V207, P450, DOI 10.1016/j.flora.2012.03.008
   Hejcman M, 2013, GRASS FORAGE SCI, V68, P345, DOI 10.1111/gfs.12066
   Hempson GP, 2015, SCIENCE, V350, P1056, DOI 10.1126/science.aac7978
   Hessl AE, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P6519, DOI 10.1002/2016GL069059
   Hessl AE, 2012, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V21, P86, DOI 10.1071/WF10108
   Higgins SI, 2000, J ECOL, V88, P213, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00435.x
   Hilbig W., 2000, Marbg. Geogr. Schriften, V135, P171
   Hirota M, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P232, DOI 10.1126/science.1210657
   Hoffmann WA, 2012, ECOL LETT, V15, P759, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01789.x
   Holdridge L. R., 1967, Life zone ecology.
   Holl KD, 2020, SCIENCE, V368, P580, DOI 10.1126/science.aba8232
   House JI, 2003, J BIOGEOGR, V30, P1763, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00873.x
   Ishikawa M, 2018, PERMAFROST PERIGLAC, V29, P271, DOI 10.1002/ppp.1990
   Ivanova GA, 2010, ENVIRON RES LETT, V5, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/015002
   JAKUCS P., 1961, PHYTOZONOLOGISCHEN V
   Kämpf I, 2016, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V25, P2563, DOI 10.1007/s10531-016-1078-x
   Kertész M, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0188260
   Kharuk VI, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P803, DOI 10.1007/s10113-016-1073-5
   Khishigjargal M, 2013, PLANT ECOL, V214, P1391, DOI 10.1007/s11258-013-0259-x
   Klotzli FA., 2014, VEGETATION ERDE GRUN, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-41950-8, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-41950-8]
   Kolár T, 2020, J ARID ENVIRON, V182, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104223
   Korotchenko I., 2012, Eurasian steppes: Ecological problems and livelihoods in a changing world, P173, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-3886-7_5
   Lashchinskiy N, 2017, FOLIA GEOBOT, V52, P175, DOI 10.1007/s12224-016-9268-6
   Lashchinsky N, 2020, INNOV LAND RES, P33, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-15927-6_4
   László E, 2018, BIOL CONSERV, V226, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.029
   Lehmann CER, 2014, SCIENCE, V343, P548, DOI 10.1126/science.1247355
   Lehmann CER, 2011, NEW PHYTOL, V191, P197, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03689.x
   Lellei-Kovács E, 2008, COMMUNITY ECOL, V9, P29, DOI 10.1556/ComEc.9.2008.1.4
   Li F. Y., 2020, Encyclopedia of the World's Biomes, P773
   Liu HY, 2015, APPL VEG SCI, V18, P43, DOI 10.1111/avsc.12139
   Liu HY, 2012, PHYS GEOGR, V33, P561, DOI 10.2747/0272-3646.33.6.561
   Liu HY, 2000, J VEG SCI, V11, P525, DOI 10.2307/3246582
   Lkhagvadorj D, 2013, HUM ECOL, V41, P725, DOI 10.1007/s10745-013-9599-3
   Lu N, 2009, ENVIRON RES LETT, V4, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045006
   Magyari EK, 2010, J BIOGEOGR, V37, P915, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02261.x
   Makunina NI, 2016, CONTEMP PROBL ECOL+, V9, P342, DOI 10.1134/S1995425516030100
   Makunina Natalia Ivanovna, 2017, International Journal of Environmental Studies, V74, P674, DOI 10.1080/00207233.2017.1283943
   Mátyás C, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9080489
   Murphy BP, 2016, PHILOS T R SOC B, V371, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2015.0319
   Murphy BP, 2012, ECOL LETT, V15, P748, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01771.x
   Myers N, 2000, NATURE, V403, P853, DOI 10.1038/35002501
   Novenko EY, 2018, HOLOCENE, V28, P308, DOI 10.1177/0959683617721331
   Novenko EY, 2016, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V25, P2453, DOI 10.1007/s10531-016-1051-8
   Onodi G, 2021, APPL VEG SCI, V24, DOI 10.1111/avsc.12546
   Owen-Smith N, 2008, ECOLOGY BROWSING GRA, P149
   Parr CL, 2014, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V29, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2014.02.004
   Pausas JG, 2019, J ECOL, V107, P1031, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13109
   Pausas JG, 2017, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V26, P395, DOI 10.1111/geb.12562
   Peltzer DA, 2001, J ECOL, V89, P519, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00570.x
   Peshkova G.A., 2001, Florogenetic Analysis of the Steppe Flora of the Mountains of Southern Siberia
   Pfeiffer M., 2019, Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, P759, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.12057-3
   Ratajczak Z, 2018, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V33, P513, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2018.04.013
   Ratajczak Z, 2017, ECOSYSTEMS, V20, P1278, DOI 10.1007/s10021-017-0110-7
   Roques KG, 2001, J APPL ECOL, V38, P268, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00567.x
   Rudenko OV, 2019, QUATERN INT, V504, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2018.01.019
   Rychnovska M., 1993, Ecosystems of the World. Natural Grasslands. Eastern Hemisphere and Resume, P125
   Sankaran M, 2004, ECOL LETT, V7, P480, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00596.x
   Sankaran M, 2005, NATURE, V438, P846, DOI 10.1038/nature04070
   Sankaran M, 2008, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V17, P236, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00360.x
   Sarmiento G., 1984, The ecology of neotropical savannas.
   Scheffer M, 2001, NATURE, V413, P591, DOI 10.1038/35098000
   Scholes RJ, 1997, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V28, P517, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.517
   Schultz J., 2005, ECOZONES WORLD, DOI DOI 10.1007/3-540-28527-X
   Shi L, 2021, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V311, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108667
   Simon T., 2000, A magyarorszagi edenyes flora hatarozoja (Harasztok-viragos novenyek)
   Smelansky I. E., 2012, EURASIAN STEPPES ECO, P45, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-3886-7, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-3886-7_2]
   Staal A, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P5096, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14408
   Staal A, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P539, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0177-y
   Staver AC, 2017, NEW PHYTOL, V216, P1151, DOI 10.1111/nph.14738
   Staver AC, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P230, DOI 10.1126/science.1210465
   STEVENS GC, 1991, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V22, P177, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.001141
   Süle G, 2020, FORESTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/f11101078
   Takatsuki S, 2018, GRASSL SCI, V64, P167, DOI 10.1111/grs.12195
   Tchebakova NM, 2009, ENVIRON RES LETT, V4, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045013
   Temperton VM, 2019, RESTOR ECOL, V27, P705, DOI 10.1111/rec.12989
   Tishkov A., 2020, ENCY WORLDS BIOMES, V3, P725
   Tölgyesi C, 2016, J PLANT ECOL, V9, P40, DOI 10.1093/jpe/rtv032
   Tölgyesi C, 2022, RESTOR ECOL, V30, DOI 10.1111/rec.13594
   Tëlgyesi C, 2020, ECOGRAPHY, V43, P848, DOI 10.1111/ecog.04906
   Tölgyesi C, 2019, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V30, P1083, DOI 10.1002/ldr.3295
   Tölgyesi C, 2018, PLANT ECOL DIVERS, V11, P465, DOI 10.1080/17550874.2018.1544674
   TOROK P., 2020, Encycl. Worlds Biomes, P703
   Torok P., 2018, Grasslands of the world: Diversity, management and conservation
   Unkelbach J, 2018, VEG HIST ARCHAEOBOT, V27, P665, DOI 10.1007/s00334-017-0664-5
   Valkó O, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V572, P1377, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.184
   Valkó O, 2014, BASIC APPL ECOL, V15, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2013.11.002
   Valladares F, 2008, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V39, P237, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173506
   van Staalduinen, 2012, EURASIAN STEPPES ECO, P209, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-3886-7_7, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-3886-7_7]
   Varga A, 2020, J ETHNOBIOL ETHNOMED, V16, DOI 10.1186/s13002-020-00397-x
   Varga A, 2015, ACTA SOC BOT POL, V84, P215, DOI 10.5586/asbp.2015.005
   Veenendaal EM, 2018, NEW PHYTOL, V218, P153, DOI 10.1111/nph.14940
   Veldman JW, 2019, SCIENCE, V366, DOI 10.1126/science.aay7976
   Veldman JW, 2016, PHILOS T R SOC B, V371, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2015.0306
   Veldman JW, 2015, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V13, P154, DOI 10.1890/140270
   Vera F. W. M., 2000, Grazing ecology and forest history, P287, DOI 10.1079/9780851994420.0287
   Wagner V., 2020, Encyclopedia of the World's Biomes, V3, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.12043-3, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.12043-3]
   Walter H, 1989, ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS G
   Wang H, 2013, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V10, P5817, DOI 10.5194/bg-10-5817-2013
   Weigl PD, 2014, BIOL REV, V89, P466, DOI 10.1111/brv.12063
   Wesche K., 2012, Eurasian Steppes. Ecological problems and livelihoods in a changing world, P3
   Wesche K, 2016, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V25, P2197, DOI 10.1007/s10531-016-1214-7
   White RP., 2000, Pilot Analysis of Global Ecosystems: Grassland Ecosystems
   Wilson SD, 2021, J ECOL, V109, P74, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13445
   Wirth C, 2005, ECOL STUD-ANAL SYNTH, V176, P309
   Xu CY, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P2370, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13582
   Yang CY, 2019, J GEOGR SCI, V29, P1527, DOI 10.1007/s11442-019-1675-1
   Yin Y, 2013, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V178, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.10.005
   Yu KL, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V207, P1038, DOI 10.1111/nph.13431
   Zech W., 2014, BODEN WELT
   Zlotin Roman., 2002, The Physical Geography of Northern Eurasia, P169
   Zolotareva NV, 2020, RUSS J ECOL+, V51, P440, DOI 10.1134/S1067413620050148
NR 168
TC 26
Z9 27
U1 9
U2 55
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1464-7931
EI 1469-185X
J9 BIOL REV
JI Biol. Rev.
PD DEC
PY 2022
VL 97
IS 6
BP 2195
EP 2208
DI 10.1111/brv.12889
EA AUG 2022
PG 14
WC Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Other Topics
GA 5Y5AE
UT WOS:000837584900001
PM 35942892
OA Green Published, Green Accepted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Strengers, Y
   Maller, C
AF Strengers, Yolande
   Maller, Cecily
TI Integrating health, housing and energy policies: social practices of
   cooling
SO BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptive behaviour; air-conditioning; cooling practices; energy
   consumption; heatwave; inhabitant behaviour; peak electricity demand;
   public health; thermal comfort
ID THERMAL COMFORT; CONSUMPTION
AB Health, housing, and energy policies to address hot weather and heatwaves are typically based on divided 'technical' and 'behavioural' strategies and tend to be developed in isolation. This approach results in conflicting outcomes both within and across public policies, potentially leaving households more vulnerable to heat. The cooling practices of Australian householders are analysed using social practice theory to highlight inherent contradictions and tensions in current policies. A range of successful adaptive strategies is identified in participants of a dynamic peak pricing electricity programme or residents of an eco-living development without air-conditioning. The findings demonstrate how householders' ability to respond to heat is shaped by the elements of cooling practices, including common understandings about air-conditioners, practical knowledge and available housing infrastructures. There is a critical need to move towards a coordinated, multi-pronged and flexible public policy response framed around the dynamic cooling practices of households. This requires policies that prioritize and support adaptive cooling infrastructures, and that recognize, support and share householders' existing adaptive capacity to respond to heat. Les politiques de la sante, du logement et de l'energie visant a faire face aux fortes chaleurs et aux canicules se fondent en regle generale sur des strategies << techniques >> et << comportementales >> eclatees et ont tendance a etre elaborees isolement. Cette approche se traduit par des resultats contradictoires aussi bien dans le cadre meme de ces politiques publiques qu'entre celles-ci, rendant ainsi les menages potentiellement plus vulnerables a la chaleur. Les pratiques de refroidissement des occupants australiens sont analysees en utilisant la theorie des pratiques sociales pour souligner les contradictions et les tensions inherentes aux politiques actuelles. Il est identifie un eventail de strategies adaptatives concluantes chez les participants qui faisaient partie d'un programme d'ecretage dynamique des pics de consommation electrique par la tarification ou bien qui vivaient dans un lotissement ecologique sans climatisation. Les resultats obtenus montrent comment la capacite des occupants a reagir a la chaleur est influencee par les elements constitutifs des pratiques de refroidissement, au nombre desquels une comprehension commune de ce que sont les climatiseurs, les connaissances pratiques et les infrastructures de logement disponibles. Il est absolument necessaire de progresser, en termes de politiques publiques, dans le sens d'une reaction souple et coordonnee, sur plusieurs fronts, s'articulant autour des pratiques de refroidissement dynamique des logements. Ceci necessite des politiques qui donnent la priorite et apportent leur soutien aux infrastructures de refroidissement adaptatives, et qui reconnaissent, appuient et partagent la capacite adaptative existante des occupants a reagir a la chaleur. Mots cles: comportement adaptatif climatisation pratiques de refroidissement consommation d'energie canicule comportement des habitants pic de demande d'electricite sante publique confort thermique.
C1 [Strengers, Yolande; Maller, Cecily] RMIT Univ, Design Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia.
C3 Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT)
RP Strengers, Y (corresponding author), RMIT Univ, Design Ctr, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia.
EM Yolande.strengers@rmit.edu.au; Cecily.maller@rmit.edu.au
RI Strengers, Yolande/AFP-7802-2022; Maller, Cecily/I-9004-2019
OI Maller, Cecily/0000-0001-8322-2124; Strengers,
   Yolande/0000-0002-5664-621X
FU Australasian CRC for Interaction Design; Australian Housing and Urban
   Research Institute; ESRC [ES/F037538/1] Funding Source: UKRI
FX The authors are grateful to the Australasian CRC for Interaction Design
   and the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute for their
   financial support in conducting this research. The authors thank the
   leaders (Carla Taines, Professor Ralph Horne and Professor John Fien)
   and participants of a writing workshop hosted by the Sustainable Urban
   and Regional Futures programme within RMIT University's Global Cities
   Institute for valuable feedback on this paper. Constructive feedback was
   gratefully received from members of the Centre for Design's Beyond
   Behaviour Change reading group, and from five anonymous Building
   Research & Information referees. The authors also express their deepest
   gratitude to the householders participating in this research.
CR Ackermann M.E., 2002, COOL COMFORT AMERICA
   Akrich Madeleine -., 1992, Shaping technology-building society: studies in sociotechnical change, P204
   [Anonymous], 1 ETSA
   [Anonymous], GREEN LOANS AUSS HOM
   [Anonymous], 2009, HEATW PLANN GUID DEV
   [Anonymous], ENERGY BUILDINGS
   [Anonymous], 2009, Ph.D. Thesis
   [Anonymous], 1996, 1996 ACEEE SUMM STUD
   [Anonymous], 2008, EN US AUSTR RES SECT
   [Anonymous], 2009 EL STAT OPP NAT
   [Anonymous], AUSTR CLIM CHANG VAR
   [Anonymous], ENV HLTH HEATW
   [Anonymous], MATH EL SUPPL PRIC C
   [Anonymous], COOL SUBS NEED PROT
   [Anonymous], CLIMATE CHANGE STRAT
   [Anonymous], STAT AIR COND AUSTR
   [Anonymous], 2006, ASHRAE GREENGUIDE DE
   [Anonymous], YOU HAV POW SAV EN
   [Anonymous], 2008, ENV ISS EN US CONS
   [Anonymous], JAPAN TRADES SUITS C
   [Anonymous], DEATH TOLL SOARED DU
   [Anonymous], 2003, COMFORT CLEANLINESS
   [Anonymous], 2004, Standard 55. Thermal Environment Conditions for Human Occupancy
   [Anonymous], 1 ERDC ACT
   [Anonymous], 1992, P ACEEE 1992 SUMM ST
   [Anonymous], COST BEN AN SMART ME
   [Anonymous], P 4 C DES INT SYST P
   [Anonymous], RES MAND DISCL POINT
   [Anonymous], 5 STAR STAND ALL NEW
   [Anonymous], CIT LOW CARB TRANS M
   [Anonymous], 1993, Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930
   [Anonymous], 10 TIPS SAV THIS WIN
   [Anonymous], JAN 2009 HEATW VICT
   [Anonymous], ECOVILLAGE CURR
   [Anonymous], WELC HIA GREENSMART
   [Anonymous], EC J
   [Anonymous], AGE
   Bouchama A, 2007, ARCH INTERN MED, V167, P2170, DOI 10.1001/archinte.167.20.ira70009
   Brager GS, 2003, BUILDINGS, CULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, P177, DOI 10.1002/9780470759066.ch11
   Brown S, 2008, BUILD RES INF, V36, P363, DOI 10.1080/09613210802076427
   BUSCH JF, 1992, ENERG BUILDINGS, V18, P235, DOI 10.1016/0378-7788(92)90016-A
   Chappells H, 2005, BUILD RES INF, V33, P32, DOI 10.1080/0961321042000322762
   Cooper G., 1998, AIR CONDITIONING AM
   Davison G, 2008, TROUBLED WATERS: CONFRONTING THE WATER CRISIS IN AUSTRALIAS CITIES, P37
   de Dear RJ, 2002, ENERG BUILDINGS, V34, P549, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00005-1
   Gram-Hanssen K, 2008, J CLEAN PROD, V16, P1181, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.006
   Gram-Hanssen K, 2010, BUILD RES INF, V38, P175, DOI 10.1080/09613210903541527
   Guy Simon., 2000, A Sociology of Energy, Buildings, and the Environment: Constructing Knowledge, Designing Practice
   Hand M., 2007, J CONSUM CULT, V7, P79, DOI [10.1177/1469540507073509, DOI 10.1177/1469540507073509]
   Hand M, 2007, ENVIRON PLANN D, V25, P668, DOI 10.1068/d413t
   Hennessy K, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P507
   Horne Ralph., 2011, Material Geographies of Household Sustainability, P89
   Humphreys M., 1998, ASHRAE Tech. Data Bull, V14, P1
   KEMPTON W, 1992, ENERG BUILDINGS, V18, P177, DOI 10.1016/0378-7788(92)90012-6
   KEMPTON W, 1982, ENERGY, V7, P817, DOI 10.1016/0360-5442(82)90030-5
   LUTZENHISER L, 1992, ENERG BUILDINGS, V18, P193, DOI 10.1016/0378-7788(92)90013-7
   Maller CJ, 2011, HEALTH PROMOT INT, V26, P492, DOI 10.1093/heapro/dar003
   PRINS G, 1992, ENERG BUILDINGS, V18, P251, DOI 10.1016/0378-7788(92)90017-B
   Reckwitz A., 2002, Eur J Soc Theory, V5, P243, DOI [DOI 10.1177/13684310222225432, 10.1177/13684310222225432]
   Rey G, 2009, EUR J EPIDEMIOL, V24, P495, DOI 10.1007/s10654-009-9374-3
   Rybczynski Withold., 1986, HOME SHORT HIST IDEA, DOI DOI 10.1179/1461957114Y.0000000085
   Schatzki Theodore., 2002, The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Exploration of the Constitution of Social Life and Change
   Shove E., 2005, Journal of Consumer Culture, V5, P43, DOI 10.1177/1469540505049846
   Shove E, 1998, ENERG POLICY, V26, P1105, DOI 10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00065-2
   Shove E, 2007, HUM AFF, V17, P154, DOI 10.2478/v10023-007-0014-9
   Shove E, 2010, ENVIRON PLANN A, V42, P1273, DOI 10.1068/a42282
   Shove E, 2010, RES POLICY, V39, P471, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019
   Shove Elizabeth., 2004, Energy Environment, V15, P1053, DOI [DOI 10.1260/0958305043026555, https://doi.org/10.1260/0958305043026555]
   Sofoulis Z, 2008, SOC ALTERN, V27, P50
   Strengers Y, 2008, BUILD RES INF, V36, P381, DOI 10.1080/09613210802087648
   Strengers Y, 2010, ENERG POLICY, V38, P7312, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.006
   Warde A, 2017, CONSUM PUBLIC LIFE, P79, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-55682-0_5
   Wilhite H, 1996, ENERG POLICY, V24, P795, DOI 10.1016/0301-4215(96)00061-4
   Wilkenfeld G., 2004, A National Demand Management Strategy for Small Airconditioners: The role of the National Appliance and Equipment Energy Efficiency Program (NAEEEP)
NR 74
TC 88
Z9 95
U1 3
U2 40
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0961-3218
EI 1466-4321
J9 BUILD RES INF
JI Build. Res. Informat.
PY 2011
VL 39
IS 2
SI SI
BP 154
EP 168
AR PII 934837395
DI 10.1080/09613218.2011.562720
PG 15
WC Construction & Building Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Construction & Building Technology
GA 742MQ
UT WOS:000288948700006
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Lusk, JJ
   Guthery, FS
   DeMaso, SJ
AF Lusk, JJ
   Guthery, FS
   DeMaso, SJ
TI Northern bobwhite (<i>Colinus virginianus</i>) abundance in relation to
   yearly weather and long-term climate patterns
SO ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
LA English
DT Article; Proceedings Paper
CT 2nd International Conference on Applications of Machine Learning to
   Ecological Modelling
CY NOV 27-DEC 02, 2000
CL ADELAIDE, AUSTRALIA
SP ISEI
DE artificial neural networks; climate adaptation; Colinus virginianus;
   global warming; northern bobwhites; population abundance; weather
   patterns
ID MODELS; PRECIPITATION; REPRODUCTION
AB We used a multilayered, backpropagation neural network to investigate the relative effects of yearly weather and long-term climate patterns on the abundance of northern bobwhites (Colinus virginianus: hereafter, bobwhite) in Oklahoma, USA. Bobwhite populations have been declining for several decades across the United States, and predicted global climate change might accelerate the rate of decline. We were interested in whether bobwhite abundance was more responsive to yearly precipitation and temperature, or to annual deviations from long-term mean climate patterns. We used roadside count data collected over a 6 year period (1991-1997) by the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation as a measure of bobwhite abundance. We standardized quail counts among counties by calculating the standard normal deviate for each county. Weather data were obtained from weather stations closest to the roadside-count route. We had 280 training cases and 68 test-validation cases. Two data sets were constructed: one using yearly weather data (actual rainfall and temperature) and the second using annual deviations from long-term mean values. We conducted simulation analyses to determine the nature of the relationship between each dependent variable and the standardized bobwhite counts. A neural network with eight neurons was most efficient for the yearly weather data, accounting for 25% of the variation in the training data. The adjusted sum-of-squares for this model was 2.42. A four-neuron network was selected for the deviation-from-normal data set, accounting for 23% of the variation in the training data. The adjusted sum-of-squares for the deviation model was 1.44, indicating it performed better than the model for yearly weather patterns. Deviation from long-term mean July and August temperatures combined contributed 31.5% to the climate network's predictions, and deviations from mean winter, spring, and summer precipitation combined contributed 42.8% to the network's predictions. As July temperature increased over the long-term mean, the number of bobwhites counted increased over the route mean, but the relationship decelerated at high July temperatures. Predicted increases in bobwhites counted were highest when August temperatures were below the mean and decreased rapidly for all temperatures greater than the mean. Predicted bobwhite counts increased asymptotically as winter rain increased over the long-term mean, but were greatest at mean spring-rainfall amounts and at below average amounts of summer rainfall. We conclude that the absolute changes in yearly weather pattern predicted by some global change models will not have as great an impact on bobwhite abundance as will the magnitude of the deviations of these values from the climate bobwhites are adapted to in this portion of their range. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Forestry, 008 C Agr Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA.
   Oklahoma Dept Wildlife Conservat, Oklahoma City, OK 73105 USA.
C3 Oklahoma State University System; Oklahoma State University - Stillwater
RP Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Forestry, 008 C Agr Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA.
EM luskj@okstate.edu
CR [Anonymous], STUDIES AVIAN BIOL
   [Anonymous], POPULATION ECOLOGY B
   Brown D.E., 1978, Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conferences, V43, P477
   Brown JL, 1999, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V96, P5565, DOI 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5565
   Campbell G.S., 1998, An introduction to environmental biophysics, V2nd, P286, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4612-1626-1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-1626-1]
   CASE RM, 1974, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V38, P638, DOI 10.2307/3800031
   CHURCH KE, 1993, QUAIL, V3, P44
   Conroy Michael J., 1993, Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, V58, P509
   CONROY MJ, 1995, ECOL APPL, V5, P17, DOI 10.2307/1942047
   Dawson W.R., 1992, P158
   DEMASO SJ, 1992, WILDLIFE SOC B, V20, P94
   DUNHAM AE, 1993, BIOTIC INTERACTIONS AND GLOBAL CHANGE, P95
   Easterling DR, 1997, SCIENCE, V277, P364, DOI 10.1126/science.277.5324.364
   EDMINSTER FC, 1954, AM GAME BIRDS FIELD, P490
   Edwards W.R., 1972, Proceedings of the First National Bobwhite Symposium, P174
   ERRINGTON P. L., 1939, WILSON BULL, V51, P22
   ERRINGTON PAUL L., 1941, WILSON BULL, V53, P85
   ERRINGTON PAUL L., 1936, AMER MIDLAND NAT, V17, P554, DOI 10.2307/2419979
   ERRINGTON PL, 1945, ECOL MONOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.2307/1943293
   Forrester ND, 1998, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V62, P1506, DOI 10.2307/3802017
   GILL FB, 1995, ORNITHOLOGY, P763
   GIULIANO WM, 1993, QUAIL, V3, P64
   Guthery FS, 2000, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V64, P407, DOI 10.2307/3803239
   GUTHERY FS, 1988, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V52, P144, DOI 10.2307/3801075
   Guthery FS, 1997, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V61, P291, DOI 10.2307/3802584
   Guthery FS, 1999, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V63, P245, DOI 10.2307/3802506
   HAGAN MT, 1996, NEURAL NETWORK DESIG, P300
   Haykin S.S., 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, P842
   Heffelfinger JR, 1999, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V63, P154, DOI 10.2307/3802496
   Hilborn Ray, 1997, V28
   HOUGHTON JT, 1990, 2 IPCC
   KAUFMAN K, 1996, LIVES N AM BIRDS, P675
   KLIMSTRA WD, 1975, WILDL MONO, V41, P37
   LAROE ET, 1991, T N AM WILDL NAT RES, V56, P171
   Lek S, 1996, AQUAT LIVING RESOUR, V9, P23, DOI 10.1051/alr:1996004
   Murray R.W., 1958, Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commission, V12, P269
   Newton I., 1998, Population Limitation in Birds, P597
   Özesmi SL, 1999, ECOL MODEL, V116, P15, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(98)00149-5
   PEOPLES A, 1991, W82R30 OKLAH DEP WIL
   PETERS RL, 1992, GLOBAL WARMING BIOL, P3
   PETERSON MJ, 1994, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V58, P222, DOI 10.2307/3809384
   Roseberry JL, 1998, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V62, P895, DOI 10.2307/3802540
   ROSEBERRY JL, 1962, ECOLOGY, V43, P739, DOI 10.2307/1933467
   ROSEBERRY JOHN L., 1964, J WILDLIFE MGMT, V28, P244, DOI 10.2307/3798084
   Rubenstein D.I., 1992, P180
   Rykiel EJ, 1996, ECOL MODEL, V90, P229, DOI 10.1016/0304-3800(95)00152-2
   Sauer J.R., 1997, N AM BREEDING BIRD S
   Schemnitz S. D., 1961, Wildlife Monographs, VNo. 8, P1
   SCHNEIDER SH, 1993, BIOTIC INTERACTIONS AND GLOBAL CHANGE, P9
   Smith M, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS STAT, P235
   SOWLS LYLE K., 1960, JOUR WILDLIFE MANGEMENT, V24, P185, DOI 10.2307/3796744
   SPEARS GS, 1993, J WILDLIFE MANAGE, V57, P805, DOI 10.2307/3809083
   Sumner E. L., 1935, California Fish and Game, V21, P167
   Swank W.G. S. Gallizioili., 1954, Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, V19, P283
   Tracy C.R., 1992, P171
   WILSON HR, 1979, POULTRY SCI, V58, P1351, DOI 10.3382/ps.0581351
NR 56
TC 45
Z9 51
U1 0
U2 25
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0304-3800
EI 1872-7026
J9 ECOL MODEL
JI Ecol. Model.
PD DEC 1
PY 2001
VL 146
IS 1-3
SI SI
BP 3
EP 15
DI 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00292-7
PG 13
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 506AN
UT WOS:000172947900002
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Minuti, G
   Stiers, I
   Coetzee, JA
AF Minuti, Gianmarco
   Stiers, Iris
   Coetzee, Julie A.
TI Climatic suitability and compatibility of the invasive<i> Iris</i><i>
   pseudacorus</i> L. (Iridaceae) in the Southern Hemisphere:
   Considerations for biocontrol
SO BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
LA English
DT Article
DE Yellow flag iris; Iris flea beetle; Aphthona nonstriata; Ecological
   niche modelling; MaxEnt
ID BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL; OCCURRENCE RECORDS; SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS; SAMPLING
   BIAS; NICHE; PRIORITIZATION; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; IMPACTS; AGENTS
AB Iris pseudacorus L. (Iridaceae) is an emergent macrophyte native to Europe, North Africa and western Asia. Considered invasive in wetland habitats around the world, this species is now the target of a biocontrol programme in the Southern Hemisphere. Native range surveys of the weed led to the selection of the flea beetle, Aphthona nonstriata Goeze (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), as a candidate biocontrol agent. An important aspect to consider in weed biocontrol is the ability of an agent to establish and thrive in the environment where it is released. Climatic incompatibility between source and intended release sites can in fact limit the success of a biocontrol programme. In the current study, the potential climatic niche of I. pseudacorus and A. nonstriata in the Southern Hemisphere was analysed. The ecological niche modelling software MaxEnt was used to map the climatic suitability of both organisms across invaded regions in South America, southern Africa and Australasia. Furthermore, occurrence records from each invaded range were used independently to model the climatic compatibility of I. pseudacorus in Europe, in order to prioritize areas of the native range to explore during future surveys for potential biocontrol agents. The models identified areas at high risk of invasion by I. pseudacorus in northern Argentina, Uruguay, southern Brazil and central Chile, as well as numerous provinces of eastern South Africa, Lesotho, southern Australia and New Zealand. Accordingly, the highest climatic suitability for A. nonstriata was predicted across the humid temperate climates of north-east Argentina, Uruguay, southern Brazil, southern South Africa, south-east Australia and New Zealand. These results can eventually be used in future release plans to prioritize areas where establishment and survival of the agent is expected to be highest. At the same time, it may be useful to search the native range of the weed for biological control agents showing high climatic adaptation towards the intended release sites of each invaded range. In this regards, our climatic compatibility models identified high-priority areas across the Mediterranean regions of Italy and southern France, as well as the temperate regions of central and western Europe. Altogether, the current study provides useful new information to tackle the invasion and advance the biocontrol programme of I. pseudacorus in the Southern Hemisphere.
C1 [Minuti, Gianmarco; Stiers, Iris] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Biol, Ecol & Biodivers Res Unit, Brussels, Belgium.
   [Minuti, Gianmarco] Rhodes Univ, Ctr Biol Control, Dept Zool & Entomol, Makhanda, South Africa.
   [Stiers, Iris] Vrije Univ Brussel, Multidisciplinary Inst Teacher Educ Sci & Technol, Brussels, Belgium.
   [Coetzee, Julie A.] Rhodes Univ, Ctr Biol Control, Dept Bot, Makhanda, South Africa.
C3 Vrije Universiteit Brussel; Rhodes University; Vrije Universiteit
   Brussel; Rhodes University
RP Minuti, G (corresponding author), Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Biol, Ecol & Biodivers Res Unit, Brussels, Belgium.
EM Gianmarco.Minuti@vub.be
RI Minuti, Gianmarco/KGM-4654-2024; Coetzee, Julie/S-5457-2019; Stiers,
   Iris/JYQ-1075-2024
OI Coetzee, Julie/0000-0002-0364-3349; Minuti,
   Gianmarco/0000-0002-1632-8612; Stiers, Iris/0000-0002-0367-1315
FU Research Foundation-Flanders [FWO SB71]; Department of Environmental
   Affairs, Natural Resource Management Programmes; South African Research
   Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology; National
   Research Foundation of South Africa;  [BAS 53];  [BAS 42]
FX & nbsp;The PhD project of G.M. is funded by a strategic basic research
   fellowship of the Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO SB71) . We thank the
   Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BAS 53 and BAS 42) and the Centre for
   Biological Control (Rhodes University) for logistic support. The authors
   would also like to thank Dr Grant Martin and Dr Guy Sutton for their
   valuable feedback. Iris pseudacorus biological control research in South
   Africa is funded through the Department of Environmental Affairs,
   Natural Resource Management Programmes (previously the Working for Water
   Programme) . The South African Research Chairs Initiative of the
   Department of Science and Technology and the National Research
   Foundation of South Africa provided additional funding. Any opinion,
   finding, conclusion or recommendation expressed in this material is that
   of the authors, and the National Research Foundation does not accept any
   liability in this regard.
CR Aiello-Lammens ME, 2015, ECOGRAPHY, V38, P541, DOI 10.1111/ecog.01132
   [Anonymous], 2013, WEED RISK ASSESSMENT
   [Anonymous], R package version 2.6-7
   Beaumont LJ, 2009, DIVERS DISTRIB, V15, P409, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00547.x
   Beck H.E., 2020, SCI DATA, V7, P274, DOI [DOI 10.1038/SDATA.2018.214, 10.1038/s41597-020-00616-w, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2018.214]
   Beck J, 2014, ECOL INFORM, V19, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.11.002
   Bell KL, 2013, J BIOGEOGR, V40, P1755, DOI 10.1111/jbi.12102
   Bellard C, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P3740, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12344
   Boria RA, 2014, ECOL MODEL, V275, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.012
   Byrne M. J., 2004, Proceedings of the XI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, Canberra, Australia, 27 April - 2 May, 2003, P28
   de Jong Yde, 2014, Biodivers Data J, pe4034, DOI 10.3897/BDJ.2.e4034
   Di Cola V, 2017, ECOGRAPHY, V40, P774, DOI 10.1111/ecog.02671
   Elith J, 2011, DIVERS DISTRIB, V17, P43, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
   Elith J, 2010, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V1, P330, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00036.x
   Estoup A, 2010, MOL ECOL, V19, P4113, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04773.x
   Fick SE, 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P4302, DOI 10.1002/joc.5086
   Fielding AH, 1997, ENVIRON CONSERV, V24, P38, DOI 10.1017/S0376892997000088
   Gallardo B, 2020, WATER RES, V178, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115771
   Gallardo B, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P151, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13004
   Gervazoni P, 2020, BIOL INVASIONS, V22, P3183, DOI 10.1007/s10530-020-02331-4
   Grewell BJ, 2021, PLANT SOIL, V466, P275, DOI 10.1007/s11104-021-04997-8
   Guevara L, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P1511, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13992
   Harms NE, 2021, INSECTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/insects12060549
   Harms NE, 2020, BIOL CONTROL, V151, DOI 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104398
   Hill MP, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0090121
   Hirzel AH, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V199, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.017
   Hortal J, 2008, OIKOS, V117, P847, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16434.x
   Jaca TP, 2015, BIOINVASIONS REC, V4, P249, DOI 10.3391/bir.2015.4.4.03
   Jacobs J., 2011, EB0203 MONT STAT U
   Kassambara A., 2020, R PACKAGE VERSION, V1, P7
   Liu CR, 2005, ECOGRAPHY, V28, P385, DOI 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03957.x
   Lobo JM, 2008, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V17, P145, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x
   Manzoor SA, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-25437-1
   Martin GD, 2020, S AFR J BOT, V132, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.sajb.2020.04.019
   McGrannachan C., 2019, MANAAKI WHENUA LANDC, V63
   Merow C, 2013, ECOGRAPHY, V36, P1058, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x
   Mgidi TN, 2007, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V84, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.018
   Minuti G, 2021, BIOCONTROL SCI TECHN, V31, P314, DOI 10.1080/09583157.2020.1853050
   Mopper S, 2016, AM J BOT, V103, P1575, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1600075
   Mukherjee A, 2011, BIOL CONTROL, V56, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.11.006
   Paterson ID, 2014, BIOCONTROL SCI TECHN, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09583157.2013.864382
   Pearson RG, 2007, J BIOGEOGR, V34, P102, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01594.x
   Peterson AT, 2003, Q REV BIOL, V78, P419, DOI 10.1086/378926
   Petitpierre B, 2017, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V26, P275, DOI 10.1111/geb.12530
   Phillips SJ, 2017, ECOGRAPHY, V40, P887, DOI 10.1111/ecog.03049
   Pournelle G. H., 1953, Journal of Mammalogy, V34, P133
   QGIS, 2022, QGIS Geographic Information System
   Reddy S, 2003, J BIOGEOGR, V30, P1719, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00946.x
   Robertson MP, 2008, BIOL CONTROL, V46, P442, DOI 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.04.002
   Robinson TB, 2020, NEOBIOTA, P463, DOI 10.3897/neobiota.62.55729
   Rodríguez-Merino A, 2019, PLANTS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/plants8100424
   Schlüter U, 2001, J EXP BOT, V52, P2213, DOI 10.1093/jexbot/52.364.2213
   Simberloff D, 2013, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V28, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.013
   Sun Y, 2017, ECOSPHERE, V8, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1731
   SUTHERLAND WJ, 1990, J ECOL, V78, P833, DOI 10.2307/2260902
   Sutton GF, 2019, BIOL CONTROL, V129, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.11.012
   Tourne DCM, 2019, ECOL EVOL, V9, P12623, DOI 10.1002/ece3.5726
   Trethowan PD, 2011, S AFR J BOT, V77, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.sajb.2010.07.007
   Verbruggen H, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0068337
   Wolmarans R, 2010, J BIOGEOGR, V37, P1797, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02325.x
   Zizka A, 2019, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V10, P744, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.13152
NR 61
TC 11
Z9 11
U1 1
U2 19
PU ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
PI SAN DIEGO
PA 525 B ST, STE 1900, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4495 USA
SN 1049-9644
EI 1090-2112
J9 BIOL CONTROL
JI Biol. Control
PD JUN
PY 2022
VL 169
AR 104886
DI 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.104886
EA MAR 2022
PG 9
WC Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Entomology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Entomology
GA 1A6DI
UT WOS:000791844700009
OA Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Nesbitt, A
   Dorling, S
   Jones, R
   Smith, DKE
   Krumins, M
   Gannon, KE
   Dorling, L
   Johnson, Z
   Conway, D
AF Nesbitt, Alistair
   Dorling, Stephen
   Jones, Richard
   Smith, Dan K. E.
   Krumins, Marcus
   Gannon, Kate E.
   Dorling, Lewis
   Johnson, Zoe
   Conway, Declan
TI Climate change projections for UK viticulture to 2040: a focus on
   improving suitability for Pinot noir
SO OENO ONE
LA English
DT Article
DE bioclimatic indices; climate resilience; climate adaptation; climate
   change; Pinot noir; viticulture suitability
ID WINEGRAPE-GROWING REGIONS; SPATIAL-ANALYSIS; WINE; FUTURE; PHENOLOGY;
   MODEL; VARIABILITY; INVESTMENT; TRENDS
AB Between 1981-2000 and 1999-2018, growing season average temperatures (GST) in the main UK viticulture regions have warmed similar to 1.0 degrees C and are now more reliably > 14.0 degrees C GST. This warming has underpinned the rapid expansion of the UK viticulture sector and its current focus on growing grape varieties for sparkling wine. Near-term (2021-2040) climate change may condition opportunities for further variety and/or wine style changes. Using the latest high -resolution (5 km) ensemble (x 12) of downscaled climate change models for the UK (UK Climate Projections; UKCP18) under Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5, we calculate near-term trends and variability in bioclimatic indices (BCIs). We simulate the projected repetition of the UK's highest yielding season-2018-and use an analogue approach to model the 1999-2018 mean growing season temperatures from Pinot noir producing areas of Champagne (France), Burgundy (France) and Baden (Germany) over the UK during 2021-2040. We also project, across the UK for the 2021-2040 period, BCI values of recent high-quality vintage years from Champagne and Burgundy. GST are projected to increase from a 1999-2018 spatial range of 13.0 (minimum threshold)-15.7 degrees C to a future (2021-2040) range of 13.0-17.0 degrees C, and Growing Degree Days (GDD) from 850 (minimum threshold)-1267 to 850-1515. Growing season precipitation (GSP) is projected to decline in some UK viticulture areas but is not modelled as a limiting viticulture factor. High inter-annual weather variability is simulated to remain a feature of the UK viticulture climate and early season frost risk is likely to occur earlier. Large areas of the UK are projected to have > 50 % of years within the bioclimatic ranges experienced during the 2018 growing season, indicating potential higher yields in the future. The 1999-2018 mean Champagne, Burgundy and Baden GST and GDD are projected for much of England and some areas in the far south and south-east of Wales during 2021- 2040, with significant areas projected to have > 25 % of years within the BCI ranges of top Champagne vintages. These results indicate greater potential for Pinot noir for sparkling wines and shifting suitability to still red wine production. Accounting for changes in variety suitability and wine styles will be essential to maximise opportunities and build resilience within this rapidly expanding wine region.
C1 [Nesbitt, Alistair] Vinescapes Ltd, Dorking, Dorking RH5 6SX, England.
   [Nesbitt, Alistair; Dorling, Stephen; Jones, Richard; Smith, Dan K. E.] Univ East Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich Res Pk, Norwich NR4 7TJ, England.
   [Gannon, Kate E.; Conway, Declan] London Sch Econ, Grantham Res Inst Climate Change & Environm, London WC2A 2AE, England.
   [Dorling, Stephen; Smith, Dan K. E.; Krumins, Marcus; Dorling, Lewis; Johnson, Zoe] Univ East Anglia, Enterprise Ctr, Weatherquest Ltd, Norwich Res Pk, Norwich NR4 7TJ, England.
C3 University of East Anglia; University of London; London School Economics
   & Political Science; University of East Anglia
RP Nesbitt, A (corresponding author), Vinescapes Ltd, Dorking, Dorking RH5 6SX, England.; Nesbitt, A (corresponding author), Univ East Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich Res Pk, Norwich NR4 7TJ, England.
EM alistair@vinescapes.com
RI Conway, Declan/HCH-7778-2022
OI Dorling, Steve/0000-0001-9087-2547; Conway, Declan/0000-0002-4590-6733;
   Smith, Daniel/0000-0003-0818-672X; Jones, Richard
   Wilson/0000-0002-2777-5805; Gannon, Kate/0000-0001-6742-8982; Nesbitt,
   Alistair/0000-0002-5228-5226
FU UK Natural Environment Research Council [NE/S016848/1]; Grantham
   Foundation for the Protection of the Environment; UK Economic and Social
   Research Council through the Centre for Climate Change Economics and
   Policy [ES/R009708/1]; ESRC [ES/R009708/1] Funding Source: UKRI; UKRI
   [NE/S016848/1] Funding Source: UKRI
FX This paper is from the Climate REsilience in the UKWine Sector
   (CREWS-UK) project
   (https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/resilient-wine/) funded by the
   UK Natural Environment Research Council (Grant number NE/S016848/1) as
   part of the UK Climate Resilience Programme
   (https://www.ukclimateresilience.org). D. Conway and K.E. Gannon are
   also supported by funding from the Grantham Foundation for the
   Protection of the Environment and the UK Economic and Social Research
   Council (ES/R009708/1) through the Centre for Climate Change Economics
   and Policy.
CR Amerine M. A., 1944, HILGARDIA, V15, P493
   Anderson JD, 2012, J INT SCI VIGNE VIN, V46, P149
   [Anonymous], 2012, GEOGRAPHY WINE REGIO, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0464-0_7
   Berry Bros and Rudd, 2021, CHART GIV IND QUAL R
   Blanco-Ward D, 2007, VITIS, V46, P63
   Bois B, 2018, OENO ONE, V52, P291, DOI 10.20870/oeno-one.2018.52.4.1580
   Briche E, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V123, P241, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-1044-5
   Cardell MF, 2019, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V19, P2299, DOI 10.1007/s10113-019-01502-x
   Copernicus, 2020, CORINE LAND COVER CL
   Decanter, 2020, VINT GUID
   Dunn M, 2019, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V19, P723, DOI 10.1007/s10113-017-1240-3
   ECMWF, 2020, ERA5
   ESRI, 2020, ARCGIS DESKT REL VER
   Fraga H, 2012, FOOD ENERGY SECUR, V1, P94, DOI 10.1002/fes3.14
   Fraga H, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P295, DOI 10.1007/s10113-013-0490-y
   Gladstones J., 2004, Viticulture 1 - Resources, P255
   Gohar L., 2018, UKCP18 Derived Projections of Future Climate over the UK
   Google, 2020, GOOGL EARTH PRO VERS
   Hall A, 2010, AUST J GRAPE WINE R, V16, P389, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2010.00100.x
   Hannah L, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P6907, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1210127110
   Hersbach H, 2020, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V146, P1999, DOI 10.1002/qj.3803
   Hollis D., 2019, HADUK GRID GRIDDED C, DOI [10.5285/d134335808894b2bb249-9f222e2eca8, DOI 10.5285/D134335808894B2BB249-9F222E2ECA8]
   Infoclimat, 2021, CLIM GLOB
   International Wine and Spirits Competition, 2017, ENGL WIN AW REC NUMB
   Johnson H., 2001, The World Atlas of Wine, V5th
   Jones G., 2009, Bulletin de l'OIV, V82, P507
   Jones G. V., 2016, Wine and Viticulture Journal, V31, P51
   Jones G. V., 2006, Fine Wine and Terroir the Geopscience Persepective, P203
   Jones GV, 2008, CLIM RES, V35, P241, DOI 10.3354/cr00708
   Jones GV, 2010, AM J ENOL VITICULT, V61, P313
   Jones GV, 2005, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V73, P319, DOI 10.1007/s10584-005-4704-2
   Jones GV, 2001, AGR ECON, V26, P115, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00058.x
   Kendon E., 2021, UPDATE UKCP LOCAL 2
   Kenny G. J., 1992, Journal of Wine Research, V3, P163, DOI 10.1080/09571269208717931
   Lewin B., 2011, SEARCH PINOT NOIR
   Met Office, 2020, UKCP18
   Met Office, 2020, CLIMATE CLIMATE CHAN
   Met Office, 2018, CHANC SUMM HEATW NOW
   Murphy J., 2018, UKCP18 LAND PROJECT
   Neethling E, 2012, CLIM RES, V53, P89, DOI 10.3354/cr01094
   Nesbitt A, 2018, J LAND USE SCI, V13, P414, DOI 10.1080/1747423X.2018.1537312
   Nesbitt A, 2016, AUST J GRAPE WINE R, V22, P324, DOI 10.1111/ajgw.12215
   Parker R, 2020, CHART GIVING INDICAT
   Robinson J, 2020, VINTAGES
   Sagristà E, 2020, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V20, DOI 10.1007/s10113-020-01673-y
   Santos JA, 2020, APPL SCI-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/app10093092
   Santos JA, 2012, CLIM RES, V51, P89, DOI 10.3354/cr01056
   Schultz Hans R., 2010, Journal of Wine Research, V21, P137, DOI 10.1080/09571264.2010.530098
   Skelton S., 2020, UK Vineyards List
   Tesic D, 2002, AUST J GRAPE WINE R, V8, P15, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2002.tb00207.x
   Tomasi D, 2011, AM J ENOL VITICULT, V62, P329, DOI 10.5344/ajev.2011.10108
   Tonietto J, 2004, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V124, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.06.001
   Tóth JP, 2016, AUST J GRAPE WINE R, V22, P64, DOI 10.1111/ajgw.12168
   van Vuuren DP, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0157-y
   Webb LB, 2007, AUST J GRAPE WINE R, V13, P165, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2007.tb00247.x
   Wine Spectator, 2020, RAT VINT CHARTS
   WineGB, 2020, 2020 IND REP GREAT B
   WineGB, 2021, Industry Press Briefing
   WineGB, 2020, HECT PROD 1975 ONW
   WineGB, 2021, Wine industry of Great Britain 2021: Latest figures
NR 60
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 2
U2 19
PU INT VITICULTURE & ENOLOGY SOC-IVES
PI VILLENAVE D ORNON
PA INST SCI VIGNE VIN-ISVV, 210 CHEMIN DE LEYSOTTE, VILLENAVE D ORNON,
   FRANCE
EI 2494-1271
J9 OENO ONE
JI OENE One
PY 2022
VL 56
IS 3
BP 69
EP 87
DI 10.20870/oeno-one.2022.56.3.5398
PG 19
WC Food Science & Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Food Science & Technology
GA 5V0YY
UT WOS:000876965200006
OA Green Accepted, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Van Pham, T
   Steger, C
   Rockel, B
   Keuler, K
   Kirchner, I
   Mertens, M
   Rieger, D
   Zängl, G
   Früh, B
AF Van Pham, Trang
   Steger, Christian
   Rockel, Burkhardt
   Keuler, Klaus
   Kirchner, Ingo
   Mertens, Mariano
   Rieger, Daniel
   Zaengl, Guenther
   Frueh, Barbara
TI ICON in Climate Limited-area Mode (ICON release version 2.6.1): a new
   regional climate model
SO GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
ID NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION; RADIATIVE-TRANSFER; ECMWF MODEL; SCHEME;
   PARAMETERIZATION; FORMULATION
AB For the first time, the Limited-Area Mode of the new ICON (Icosahedral Nonhydrostatic) weather and climate model has been used for a continuous long-term regional climate simulation over Europe. Built upon the Limited-Area Mode of ICON (ICON-LAM), ICON-CLM (ICON in Climate Limited-area Mode, hereafter ICON-CLM, available in ICON release version 2.6.1) is an adaptation for climate applications. A first version of ICON-CLM is now available and has already been integrated into a starter package (ICON-CLM_SP_betal). The starter package provides users with a technical infrastructure that facilitates long-term simulations as well as model evaluation and test routines. ICON-CLM and ICON-CLM_SP were successfully installed and tested on two different computing systems. Tests with different domain decompositions showed bit-identical results, and no systematic outstanding differences were found in the results with different model time steps. ICON-CLM was also able to reproduce the large-scale atmospheric information from the global driving model. Comparison was done between ICON-CLM and the COnsortium for Small-scale MOdeling (COSMO)-CLM (the recommended model configuration by the CLM-Community) performance. For that, an evaluation run of ICON-CLM with ERA-Interim boundary conditions was carried out with the setup similar to the COSMO-CLM recommended optimal setup. ICON-CLM results showed biases in the same range as those of COSMO-CLM for all evaluated surface variables. While this COSMO-CLM simulation was carried out with the latest model version which has been developed and was carefully tuned for climate simulations on the European domain, ICON-CLM was not tuned yet. Nevertheless, ICON-CLM showed a better performance for air temperature and its daily extremes, and slightly better performance for total cloud cover. For precipitation and mean sea level pressure, COSMO-CLM was closer to observations than ICON-CLM. However, as ICON-CLM is still in the early stage of development, there is still much room for improvement.
C1 [Van Pham, Trang; Steger, Christian; Rieger, Daniel; Zaengl, Guenther; Frueh, Barbara] Deutsch Wetterdienst, Frankfurter Str 135, D-63067 Offenbach, Germany.
   [Rockel, Burkhardt] Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht, Max Planck Str 1, D-21502 Geesthacht, Germany.
   [Keuler, Klaus] Brandenburg Tech Univ Cottbus, POB 10 13 44, D-03013 Cottbus, Germany.
   [Kirchner, Ingo] Free Univ Berlin, Carl Heinrich Becker Weg 6-10, D-12165 Berlin, Germany.
   [Mertens, Mariano] Deutsch Zentrum Luft & Raumfahrt, Inst Phys Atmosphare, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany.
C3 Deutscher Wetterdienst; Helmholtz Association; Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon;
   Max Planck Society; Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus; Free
   University of Berlin; Helmholtz Association; German Aerospace Centre
   (DLR)
RP Van Pham, T (corresponding author), Deutsch Wetterdienst, Frankfurter Str 135, D-63067 Offenbach, Germany.
EM trang.pham-van@dwd.de
OI Kirchner, Ingo/0000-0002-4103-6849; Mertens,
   Mariano/0000-0003-3549-6889; Fruh, Barbara/0000-0002-9283-6627; Zangl,
   Gunther/0000-0002-7443-7163
FU project ProWas (Projection Service for Waterways and Shipping),
   Deutscher Wetterdienst
FX This research was supported by project ProWas (Projection Service for
   Waterways and Shipping), Deutscher Wetterdienst.
CR Anders I, 2009, CLIM DYNAM, V33, P177, DOI 10.1007/s00382-008-0470-y
   [Anonymous], **DATA OBJECT**, DOI DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.3896136
   Baldauf M, 2011, MON WEATHER REV, V139, P3887, DOI 10.1175/MWR-D-10-05013.1
   Barker HW, 2003, J CLIMATE, V16, P2676, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<2676:ADASRT>2.0.CO;2
   Bechtold P, 2008, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V134, P1337, DOI 10.1002/qj.289
   Brovkin V, 2013, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V5, P48, DOI 10.1029/2012MS000169
   Christensen JH, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V81, P7, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9210-7
   Dee DP, 2011, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V137, P553, DOI 10.1002/qj.828
   Doms G., 2011, Consortium for small scale modelling
   Doms G., 1999, NONHYDROSTATIC LTD A, P10
   GALCHEN T, 1975, J COMPUT PHYS, V17, P209, DOI 10.1016/0021-9991(75)90037-6
   Gampe D, 2017, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V4, DOI 10.3390/hydrology4040053
   Giorgetta MA, 2018, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V10, P1613, DOI 10.1029/2017MS001242
   Giorgetta MA, 2013, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V5, P572, DOI 10.1002/jame.20038
   Giorgi F., 2009, Bulletin - World Meteorological Organization, V58, P175
   Harris I, 2014, INT J CLIMATOL, V34, P623, DOI 10.1002/joc.3711
   Heinze R, 2017, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V143, P69, DOI 10.1002/qj.2947
   Hofstra N, 2009, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V114, DOI 10.1029/2009JD011799
   Korn P, 2017, J COMPUT PHYS, V339, P525, DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.03.009
   Kotlarski S, 2014, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V7, P1297, DOI 10.5194/gmd-7-1297-2014
   Leuenberger D, 2010, MON WEATHER REV, V138, P3683, DOI 10.1175/2010MWR3307.1
   MAJEWSKI D., 2002, PROMET, V27, P111
   Mlawer EJ, 1997, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V102, P16663, DOI 10.1029/97JD00237
   Orr A, 2010, J CLIMATE, V23, P5905, DOI 10.1175/2010JCLI3490.1
   Rieger D., 2019, Reports on ICON, DOI [10.5676/DWDpub/nwv/icon004, DOI 10.5676/DWDPUB/NWV/ICON004]
   RITTER B, 1992, MON WEATHER REV, V120, P303, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<0303:ACRSFN>2.0.CO;2
   Rockel B, 2008, METEOROL Z, V17, P347, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0309
   Sanchez-Gomez E, 2009, CLIM DYNAM, V33, P723, DOI 10.1007/s00382-008-0502-7
   Schär C, 2002, MON WEATHER REV, V130, P2459, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<2459:ANTFVC>2.0.CO;2
   Schrodin R., 2001, MULTI LAYER VERSION, DOI [10.5676/DWD_pub/nwv/cosmo-tr_2, DOI 10.5676/DWD_PUB/NWV/COSMO-TR_2]
   Schulz JP, 2016, METEOROL Z, V25, P607, DOI 10.1127/metz/2016/0537
   Seifert A, 2001, ATMOS RES, V59, P265, DOI 10.1016/S0169-8095(01)00126-0
   SIMMONS AJ, 1981, MON WEATHER REV, V109, P758, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1981)109<0758:AEAAMC>2.0.CO;2
   Stephenson TS, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V113, DOI 10.1029/2007JD009127
   Stevens B, 2013, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V5, P146, DOI 10.1002/jame.20015
   Tegen I, 1997, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V102, P23895, DOI 10.1029/97JD01864
   TIEDTKE M, 1989, MON WEATHER REV, V117, P1779, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1779:ACMFSF>2.0.CO;2
   Trusilova K., 2014, URBAN EFFECTS CLIMAT, V2, P4
   van den Besselaar EJM, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V116, DOI 10.1029/2010JD015468
   Van Pham T, 2014, OCEANOLOGIA, V56, P167, DOI 10.5697/oc.56-2.167
   Zängl G, 2015, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V141, P563, DOI 10.1002/qj.2378
NR 41
TC 17
Z9 17
U1 1
U2 11
PU COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
PI GOTTINGEN
PA BAHNHOFSALLEE 1E, GOTTINGEN, 37081, GERMANY
SN 1991-959X
EI 1991-9603
J9 GEOSCI MODEL DEV
JI Geosci. Model Dev.
PD FEB 18
PY 2021
VL 14
IS 2
BP 985
EP 1005
DI 10.5194/gmd-14-985-2021
PG 21
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology
GA QL9HY
UT WOS:000621392500002
OA Green Submitted, Green Accepted, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Bahrani, HA
   Ghazvini, H
   Amiri, B
   Bazrafshan, F
   Nikkhah, H
AF Bahrani, Hamzeh Abbasipour
   Ghazvini, Habibollah
   Amiri, Bahram
   Bazrafshan, Foroud
   Nikkhah, Hamidreza
TI Responses of Barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.) Genotypes to Salinity
   Stress Under Controlled and Field Conditions
SO GESUNDE PFLANZEN
LA English
DT Article
DE Barely; Salinity stress; Adaptability; Warm climate zone; Controlled
   conditions
ID SCREENING METHODS; SALT TOLERANCE; GROWTH
AB This study was conducted to determine the effects of salinity on grain yield and some salinity-tolerance related traits of 20 barley genotypes in Bushehr province, Iran. Barley genotypes were selected on the basis of their tolerance to salinity in the temperate and warm regions or their yield performance and adaptability in the south warm regions of Iran. All 20 genotypes were initially evaluated for their salinity tolerance in greenhouse under pot culture and hydroponic conditions. Under both conditions, increasing salinity resulted in a significant decrease for all studied traits. The most salinity-tolerant genotypes under pot culture were genotypes STW-81-2, Golshan, Nimrooz and Oxin. In contrast, genotypes MBS-87-19, MBS-89-11, Zahak and ASBYT-M-86-3 exhibited higher salinity tolerance under solution culture. Based on results of greenhouse evaluation, seven lines and cultivars that showed higher tolerance to salinity were selected and studied in a field experiment under different salt treatments (1.5, 8 and 12 dS/m NaCl). Results of field experiment showed that cultivars Oxin and Nimrooz, and breeding line STW-81-10 which had high grain yield and outstanding salinity-tolerance related traits under pot culture, also performed well under salinity stress in the field experiment. Stress tolerance indices (STI) of genotypes Oxin, Nimrooz and breeding line STW-81-2 were 1.278, 1.068 and 0.960, respectively, indicating their higher salinity tolerance compared to the other genotypes. Results of this study indicated that barley genotypes with no history of selection for salinity tolerance (e.g Oxin and Nimrooz), but with a good level of adaptability in the warm climate zone, had better performance under saline conditions compared to those genotypes improved specifically for such conditions in the temperate zone of Iran. This finding may suggest that adaptation to climate conditions is an essential factor for breeding salinity tolerant barley genotypes in the warm zone of the country.
C1 [Bahrani, Hamzeh Abbasipour; Amiri, Bahram; Bazrafshan, Foroud] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Agron, Firouzabad Branch, Firouzabad, Iran.
   [Ghazvini, Habibollah] Agr Res Educ & Extens Org AREEO, Cereal Res Dept, Seed & Plant Improvement Inst, Karaj, Iran.
   [Nikkhah, Hamidreza] Agr Res Educ & Extens Org AREEO, Seed & Plant Improvement Res Dept, Khorasan Razavi Agr & Nat Resources Res & Educ Ct, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran.
C3 Islamic Azad University
RP Ghazvini, H (corresponding author), Agr Res Educ & Extens Org AREEO, Cereal Res Dept, Seed & Plant Improvement Inst, Karaj, Iran.
EM habib_ghaz@yahoo.com
RI amiri, bahram/AAO-7229-2021; Bazrafshan, Foroud/JPX-1819-2023; Ghazvini,
   Habibollah/AAD-5395-2022
CR Arzani A, 2016, CRIT REV PLANT SCI, V35, P146, DOI 10.1080/07352689.2016.1245056
   Arzani A, 2008, IN VITRO CELL DEV-PL, V44, P373, DOI 10.1007/s11627-008-9157-7
   Ebrahim F, 2020, PLANT BREEDING, V139, P304, DOI 10.1111/pbr.12770
   FERNANDEZ GCJ, 1993, ADAPTATION OF FOOD CROPS TO TEMPERATURE AND WATER STRESS, P257
   Flowers TJ, 2015, ANN BOT-LONDON, V115, P327, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcu267
   Gharaghanipor N, 2022, FRONT PLANT SCI, V13, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2022.819282
   GoI, 2019, Agricultural statistics at a glance
   Gürel F, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.01137
   Kopittke PM, 2011, NEW PHYTOL, V189, P1110, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03551.x
   Mahlooji M, 2018, PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V56, P549, DOI 10.1007/s11099-017-0699-y
   Munns R, 2003, PLANT SOIL, V253, P201, DOI 10.1023/A:1024553303144
   Munns R, 2008, ANNU REV PLANT BIOL, V59, P651, DOI 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
   Pirasteh-Anosheh H, 2016, PLANT-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION: RESPONSES AND APPROACHES TO MITIGATE STRESS, P141
   Pour-Aboughadareh A, 2019, APPL PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.1002/aps3.11278
   Radi A. A., 2013, Journal of Biology and Earth Sciences, V3, pB72
   Saade S, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0236037
   SALIM M, 1989, NEW PHYTOL, V113, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1989.tb02390.x
   Singh K., 2001, Application of Physiology in Wheat Breeding, P101
   Srivastava J. P., 1984, Salinity tolerance in plants - strategies for crop improvement, P273
   Tavakkoli E., 2011, THESIS U ADELAIDE AD
   Tavakkoli E, 2012, J EXP BOT, V63, P3853, DOI 10.1093/jxb/ers085
   ZADOKS JC, 1974, WEED RES, V14, P415, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x
NR 22
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 3
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 0367-4223
EI 1439-0345
J9 GESUNDE PFLANZ
JI Gesunde Pflanz.
PD JUN
PY 2023
VL 75
IS 3
BP 499
EP 513
DI 10.1007/s10343-022-00711-5
EA AUG 2022
PG 15
WC Agronomy
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA G0UX0
UT WOS:000847629300001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Montanez-Gonzalez, R
   Vallera, AC
   Calzetta, M
   Pichler, V
   Love, RR
   Guelbeogo, MW
   Dabire, RK
   Pombi, M
   Costantini, C
   Simard, F
   della Torre, A
   Besansky, NJ
AF Montanez-Gonzalez, Raquel
   Vallera, Alexandra C.
   Calzetta, Maria
   Pichler, Verena
   Love, Rachel R.
   Guelbeogo, Moussa W.
   Dabire, Roch K.
   Pombi, Marco
   Costantini, Carlo
   Simard, Frederic
   della Torre, Alessandra
   Besansky, Nora J.
TI A PCR-RFLP method for genotyping of inversion 2R<i>c</i> in <i>Anopheles
   coluzzii</i>
SO PARASITES & VECTORS
LA English
DT Article
DE Anopheles gambiae complex; Chromosomal inversion; Inversion genotyping;
   Malaria vector; Molecular karyotyping; PCR-RFLP; Tag SNP
ID GAMBIAE COMPLEX; MOLECULAR-FORMS; SPECIATION; IDENTIFICATION;
   ADAPTATION; EVOLUTION; VECTORS; DNA
AB BackgroundGenotyping of polymorphic chromosomal inversions in malaria vectors such as An. coluzzii Coetzee & Wilkerson is important, both because they cause cryptic population structure that can mislead vector analysis and control and because they influence epidemiologically relevant eco-phenotypes. The conventional cytogenetic method of genotyping is an impediment because it is labor intensive, requires specialized training, and can be applied only to one gender and developmental stage. Here, we circumvent these limitations by developing a simple and rapid molecular method of genotyping inversion 2Rc in An. coluzzii that is both economical and field-friendly. This inversion is strongly implicated in temporal and spatial adaptations to climatic and ecological variation, particularly aridity.MethodsUsing a set of tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) strongly correlated with inversion orientation, we identified those that overlapped restriction enzyme recognition sites and developed four polymerase chain reaction (PCR) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assays that distinguish alternative allelic states at the tag SNPs. We assessed the performance of these assays using mosquito population samples from Burkina Faso that had been cytogenetically karyotyped as well as genotyped, using two complementary high-throughput molecular methods based on tag SNPs. Further validation was performed using mosquito population samples from additional West African (Benin, Mali, Senegal) and Central African (Cameroon) countries.ResultsOf four assays tested, two were concordant with the 2Rc cytogenetic karyotype > 90% of the time in all samples. We recommend that these two assays be employed in tandem for reliable genotyping. By accepting only those genotypic assignments where both assays agree,>99% of assignments are expected to be accurate.ConclusionsWe have developed tandem PCR-RFLP assays for the accurate genotyping of inversion 2Rc in An. coluzzii. Because this approach is simple, inexpensive, and requires only basic molecular biology equipment, it is widely accessible. These provide a crucial tool for probing the molecular basis of eco-phenotypes relevant to malaria epidemiology and vector control.
C1 [Montanez-Gonzalez, Raquel; Vallera, Alexandra C.; Love, Rachel R.; Besansky, Nora J.] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Biol Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA.
   [Montanez-Gonzalez, Raquel; Love, Rachel R.; Besansky, Nora J.] Univ Notre Dame, Eck Inst Global Hlth, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA.
   [Calzetta, Maria; Pichler, Verena; Pombi, Marco; della Torre, Alessandra] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dipartimento Sanita Pubbl & Malattie Infett, Ist Pasteur, Fdn Cenci Bolognetti, I-00185 Rome, Italy.
   [Guelbeogo, Moussa W.] Ctr Natl Rech & Format Paludisme CNRFP, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
   [Dabire, Roch K.] Ctr Muraz, Inst Rech Sci Sante IRSS, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
   [Costantini, Carlo; Simard, Frederic] Univ Montpellier, CNRS, MIVEGEC, IRD, Montpellier, France.
C3 University of Notre Dame; University of Notre Dame; Fondazione Cenci
   Bolognetti; Sapienza University Rome; Centre Muraz; Universite de
   Montpellier; Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement (IRD); Centre
   National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
RP Besansky, NJ (corresponding author), Univ Notre Dame, Dept Biol Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA.; Besansky, NJ (corresponding author), Univ Notre Dame, Eck Inst Global Hlth, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA.
EM nbesansk@nd.edu
RI Pombi, Marco/JBR-7922-2023; Costantini, Carlo/F-3470-2012; SIMARD,
   Frederic/J-9489-2016
OI DELLA TORRE, Alessandra/0000-0001-7054-0027; Costantini,
   Carlo/0000-0003-1016-129X; SIMARD, Frederic/0000-0002-2871-5329
FU US National Institutes of Health [R01 AI125360]; Bill & Melinda Gates
   Foundation [OPP1141988]; Progetti di Ricerca Universita SAPIENZA 2018;
   University of Notre Dame; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
   Diseases [R01AI125360] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER; Bill and Melinda
   Gates Foundation [OPP1141988] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates
   Foundation
FX This study was supported by the US National Institutes of Health (R01
   AI125360). During this work, NJB was supported by the Bill & Melinda
   Gates Foundation (Target Malaria, OPP1141988). Under the grant
   conditions of the Foundation, a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic
   License has already been assigned to the Author Accepted Manuscript
   version that might arise from this submission. ADT was supported by
   Progetti di Ricerca Universita SAPIENZA 2018. ACV received summer
   support from the Glynn Family Honors Program of the University of Notre
   Dame. RMG was supported in part by a Kinesis-Fernandez Richards Family
   Fellowship from the University of Notre Dame.
CR Akogbeto Martin, 1995, Journal of African Zoology, V109, P443
   Barrón M, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-49065-5
   Cheng CD, 2012, GENETICS, V190, P1417, DOI 10.1534/genetics.111.137794
   Clarkson CS, 2020, GENOME RES, V30, P1533, DOI 10.1101/gr.262790.120
   Coetzee M, 2013, ZOOTAXA, V3619, P246, DOI 10.11646/zootaxa.3619.3.2
   Coluzzi M, 2002, SCIENCE, V298, P1415, DOI 10.1126/science.1077769
   COLUZZI M, 1979, T ROY SOC TROP MED H, V73, P483, DOI 10.1016/0035-9203(79)90036-1
   COLUZZI M, 1984, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V62, P107
   Costantini Carlo, 2009, BMC Ecology, V9, P16, DOI 10.1186/1472-6785-9-16
   della Torre A, 2001, INSECT MOL BIOL, V10, P9, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2001.00235.x
   Fanello C, 2002, MED VET ENTOMOL, V16, P461, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2002.00393.x
   George P, 2010, INSECT MOL BIOL, V19, P675, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2010.01025.x
   Giraldo-Calderón GI, 2015, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V43, pD707, DOI 10.1093/nar/gku1117
   Hoffmann AA, 2008, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V39, P21, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173532
   Kirkpatrick M, 2006, GENETICS, V173, P419, DOI 10.1534/genetics.105.047985
   Kirkpatrick M, 2010, PLOS BIOL, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000501
   Love RR, 2020, G3-GENES GENOM GENET, V10, P3299, DOI 10.1534/g3.120.401418
   Love RR, 2019, G3-GENES GENOM GENET, V9, P3249, DOI 10.1534/g3.119.400445
   Lukindu M, 2020, INSECTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/insects11100693
   Ma JZ, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0040224
   Miles A, 2017, NATURE, V552, P96, DOI 10.1038/nature24995
   Montanez-Gonzalez R, 2020, PARASITE VECTOR, V13, DOI 10.1186/s13071-019-3877-x
   PETRARCA V, 1987, MED VET ENTOMOL, V1, P303, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1987.tb00359.x
   Pombi M, 2008, AM J TROP MED HYG, V79, P201, DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-8-309
   Sangare DM, 2007, BREAKPOINT ANAL ANOP
   Santolamazza F, 2004, AM J TROP MED HYG, V70, P604, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.2004.70.604
   Santolamazza F, 2008, MALARIA J, V7, DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-7-163
   SCOTT JA, 1993, AM J TROP MED HYG, V49, P520, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.1993.49.520
   Simard Frederic, 2009, BMC Ecology, V9, P17, DOI 10.1186/1472-6785-9-17
   Thawornwattana Y, 2018, MOL BIOL EVOL, V35, P2512, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msy158
   Torre A. della, 1997, The molecular biology of insect disease vectors: a methods manual., P329
   Toure Y. T., 1998, Parassitologia (Rome), V40, P477
   Touroutine D, 2020, GENETICS, V216, P343, DOI 10.1534/genetics.120.303553
   Untergasser A, 2012, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V40, DOI 10.1093/nar/gks596
   Vincze T, 2003, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V31, P3688, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkg526
   Wellenreuther M, 2018, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V33, P427, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2018.04.002
   White BJ, 2011, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V42, P111, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145028
NR 37
TC 5
Z9 6
U1 0
U2 3
PU BMC
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND
SN 1756-3305
J9 PARASITE VECTOR
JI Parasites Vectors
PD MAR 22
PY 2021
VL 14
IS 1
AR 174
DI 10.1186/s13071-021-04657-x
PG 10
WC Parasitology; Tropical Medicine
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Parasitology; Tropical Medicine
GA RC5FB
UT WOS:000632825900001
PM 33752733
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU da Costa, ANL
   Feitosa, JV
   Montezuma, PA
   de Souza, PT
   de Araújo, AA
AF Lima da Costa, Antonio Nelson
   Feitosa, Jose Valmir
   Montezuma, Pericles Afonso, Jr.
   de Souza, Priscila Teixeira
   de Araujo, Airton Alencar
TI Rectal temperatures, respiratory rates, production, and reproduction
   performances of crossbred Girolando cows under heat stress in
   northeastern Brazil
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptability; Bioclimatology; Dairy cows; Physiology; Semiarid
ID BODY-TEMPERATURE; DAIRY-COWS; HOLSTEIN; CATTLE
AB This study compared the two breed groups of Girolando (A1/2 Holstein A1/2 Gyr vs. A3/4 Holstein A1/4 Gyr) through analysis of the percentages (stressed or non-stressed cows) of rectal temperature (RT), respiratory rate (RR) and pregnancy rate (PR), and means of production and reproduction parameters to determine the group best suited to rearing in semiarid tropical climate. The experiment was conducted at the farm, in the municipality of Umirim, State of Ceara, Brazil. Two hundred and forty cows were used in a 2 Au 2 factorial study; 120 of each group were kept under an intensive system during wet and dry seasons. The environmental parameters obtained were relative humidity (RH), air temperature (AT), and the temperature and humidity index (THI). Pregnancy diagnosis (PD) was determined by ultrasonography 30 days after artificial insemination (AI). The milk production of each cow was recorded with automated milkings in the farm. The variables were expressed as mean and standard error, evaluated by ANOVA at 5 % probability using the GLM procedure of SAS. Chi-square test at 5 % probability was applied to data of RT, RR, pregnancy rate (PR), and the number of AIs to obtain pregnancy. The majority of A1/2 Holstein cows showed mean values of RT and RR within the normal range in both periods and shifts. Most animals of the A3/4 Holstein group exhibited the RR means above normal during the afternoon in the rainy and dry periods and RT means above normal during the afternoon in the dry period. After analyses, A1/2 Holstein crossbred cows are more capable of thermoregulating than A3/4 Holstein cows under conditions of thermal stress, and the dry period was more impacting for bovine physiology with significant changes in physiological parameters, even for the first breed group. Knowledge of breed groups adapted to climatic conditions of northeastern Brazil can directly assist cattle farmers in selecting animals best adapted for forming herds.
C1 [Lima da Costa, Antonio Nelson; Feitosa, Jose Valmir] Univ Fed Cariri UFCA, Curso Agron, BR-63133610 Crato, CE, Brazil.
   [de Souza, Priscila Teixeira; de Araujo, Airton Alencar] Univ Estadual Ceara UECE, Fac Vet, BR-60714903 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
   [Montezuma, Pericles Afonso, Jr.] Companhia Alimentos Nordeste CIALNE, BR-60761190 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
C3 Universidade Federal do Cariri; Universidade Estadual do Ceara
RP da Costa, ANL (corresponding author), Univ Fed Cariri UFCA, Curso Agron, Rua Vereador Sebastiao Maciel Lopes S-N, BR-63133610 Crato, CE, Brazil.
EM nelsonlcvet@gmail.com
RI DE+ARAÚJO, AIRTON/AAK-6493-2020
OI Alencar de Araujo, Airton/0000-0002-6636-3803
FU Universidade Federal do Ceara
FX The authors gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of the owners, the
   herdsman, and the staff of the Companhia de Alimentos do Nordeste. We
   also acknowledge the Universidade Federal do Ceara for the support given
   to this work as part of PhD dissertation from the first author.
CR Amaral BC, 2009, J DAIRY SCI, V92, P5988, DOI [10.3168/jds.2009-2343, DOI 10.3168/JDS.2009-2343]
   [Anonymous], 1959, Weatherwise, DOI [10.1080/00431672.1959.9926960, DOI 10.1080/00431672.1959.9926960]
   Burfeind O, 2012, THERIOGENOLOGY, V78, P2031, DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.07.024
   Du Preez JH, 2000, ONDERSTEPOORT J VET, V67, P263
   DUPREEZ JH, 1990, ONDERSTEPOORT J VET, V57, P183
   Morais DAEF, 2008, REV BRAS ZOOTECN, V37, P538, DOI 10.1590/S1516-35982008000300020
   Ferreira F, 2006, ARQ BRAS MED VET ZOO, V58, P732, DOI 10.1590/S0102-09352006000500005
   Guimaraes JD, 2002, REV BRAS ZOOTECN, V31, P641, DOI 10.1590/S1516-35982002000300014
   Hermsworth PH, 1995, APPL ANIM BEHAV SCI, V42, P161, DOI [10.1016/0168-1591(94)00538-P, DOI 10.1016/0168-1591(94)00538-P]
   Ju JC, 2005, THERIOGENOLOGY, V64, P1677, DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.03.025
   Kadzere CT, 2002, LIVEST PROD SCI, V77, P59, DOI 10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00330-X
   da Costa ANL, 2015, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V59, P231, DOI 10.1007/s00484-014-0838-0
   Marai IFM, 2010, LIVEST SCI, V127, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.08.001
   Marai IFM, 1999, TROP ANIM HEALTH PRO, V31, P233, DOI 10.1023/A:1005219227668
   McManus C, 2009, LIVEST SCI, V120, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.07.014
   Mellado M, 2011, TROP SUBTROP AGROECO, V14, P927
   Nabenishi H, 2011, J REPROD DEVELOP, V57, P450, DOI 10.1262/jrd.10-135T
   Nardone A, 2010, LIVEST SCI, V130, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.011
   Perissinotto M., 2007, Rev. de Ciências Agrárias, V30, P135
   SAS, 2011, STAT AN SYST MICR WI
   Smith B.P., 2009, LARGE ANIMAL INTERNA, V4th
   Srikandakumar A, 2004, TROP ANIM HEALTH PRO, V36, P685, DOI 10.1023/B:TROP.0000042868.76914.a9
   Suthar V, 2012, J DAIRY RES, V79, P135, DOI 10.1017/S0022029911000896
   Tao S, 2011, J DAIRY SCI, V94, P5976, DOI 10.3168/jds.2011-4329
   Wolfenson D, 2000, ANIM REPROD SCI, V60, P535, DOI 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00102-0
NR 25
TC 48
Z9 53
U1 1
U2 45
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 0020-7128
EI 1432-1254
J9 INT J BIOMETEOROL
JI Int. J. Biometeorol.
PD NOV
PY 2015
VL 59
IS 11
BP 1647
EP 1653
DI 10.1007/s00484-015-0971-4
PG 7
WC Biophysics; Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Physiology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biophysics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences; Physiology
GA CT5ZE
UT WOS:000362889000011
PM 25702060
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Parnell, LD
   Blokker, BA
   Dashti, HS
   Nesbeth, PD
   Cooper, BE
   Ma, YY
   Lee, YC
   Hou, RX
   Lai, CQ
   Richardson, K
   Ordovás, JM
AF Parnell, Laurence D.
   Blokker, Britt A.
   Dashti, Hassan S.
   Nesbeth, Paula-Dene
   Cooper, Brittany Elle
   Ma, Yiyi
   Lee, Yu-Chi
   Hou, Ruixue
   Lai, Chao-Qiang
   Richardson, Kris
   Ordovas, Jose M.
TI CardioGxE, a catalog of gene-environment interactions for
   cardiometabolic traits
SO BIODATA MINING
LA English
DT Article
DE Cardiovascular diseases; Diet; Gene-environment interaction; Genetic
   variants; Phenotypic variance; Physical activity; Type 2 diabetes
ID SINGLE-NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS; MICRORNA TARGET SITES; ESTER TRANSFER
   PROTEIN; HIGH-ALTITUDE; LINKING POLYMORPHISMS; POLYMIRTS DATABASE;
   POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION; HUMAN-DISEASES; SNPS; GENOTYPE
AB Background: Genetic understanding of complex traits has developed immensely over the past decade but remains hampered by incomplete descriptions of contribution to phenotypic variance. Gene-environment (GxE) interactions are one of these contributors and in the guise of diet and physical activity are important modulators of cardiometabolic phenotypes and ensuing diseases.
   Results: We mined the scientific literature to collect GxE interactions from 386 publications for blood lipids, glycemic traits, obesity anthropometrics, vascular measures, inflammation and metabolic syndrome, and introduce CardioGxE, a gene-environment interaction resource. We then analyzed the genes and SNPs supporting cardiometabolic GxEs in order to demonstrate utility of GxE SNPs and to discern characteristics of these important genetic variants. We were able to draw many observations from our extensive analysis of GxEs. 1) The CardioGxE SNPs showed little overlap with variants identified by main effect GWAS, indicating the importance of environmental interactions with genetic factors on cardiometabolic traits. 2) These GxE SNPs were enriched in adaptation to climatic and geographical features, with implications on energy homeostasis and response to physical activity. 3) Comparison to gene networks responding to plasma cholesterol-lowering or regression of atherosclerotic plaques showed that GxE genes have a greater role in those responses, particularly through high-energy diets and fat intake, than do GWAS-identified genes for the same traits. Other aspects of the CardioGxE dataset were explored.
   Conclusions: Overall, we demonstrate that SNPs supporting cardiometabolic GxE interactions often exhibit transcriptional effects or are under positive selection. Still, not all such SNPs can be assigned potential functional or regulatory roles often because data are lacking in specific cell types or from treatments that approximate the environmental factor of the GxE. With research on metabolic related complex disease risk embarking on genome-wide GxE interaction tests, CardioGxE will be a useful resource.
C1 [Parnell, Laurence D.; Blokker, Britt A.; Dashti, Hassan S.; Nesbeth, Paula-Dene; Cooper, Brittany Elle; Ma, Yiyi; Lee, Yu-Chi; Hou, Ruixue; Lai, Chao-Qiang; Richardson, Kris; Ordovas, Jose M.] Tufts Univ, JM USDA Human Nutr Res Ctr Aging, Boston, MA 02111 USA.
C3 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); Tufts University
RP Parnell, LD (corresponding author), Tufts Univ, JM USDA Human Nutr Res Ctr Aging, 711 Washington St, Boston, MA 02111 USA.
EM laurence.parnell@ars.usda.gov
RI Hou, Ruixue/AAD-1375-2020; Chi, Chien-Yu/HJH-0077-2022; Ma,
   Yiyi/J-5237-2017
OI Ma, Yiyi/0000-0002-3609-8877; Lai, Chao-Qiang/0000-0003-1107-8375;
   Dashti, Hassan/0000-0002-1650-679X
FU National Institutes of Health [5R21HL114238-02]; U.S. Department of
   Agriculture [58-1950-0-014]
FX This work is supported in part by National Institutes of Health
   (5R21HL114238-02) to LDP. This material is based upon work supported by
   the U.S. Department of Agriculture, under agreement No. 58-1950-0-014.
   Any opinions, findings, conclusion, or recommendations expressed in this
   publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the
   view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
CR AlSaleh A, 2011, J NUTRIGENET NUTRIGE, V4, P354, DOI 10.1159/000336362
   Andreassi MG, 2009, MUTAT RES-FUND MOL M, V667, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.10.018
   Bains RK, 2013, BMC GENET, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2156-14-34
   Bao L, 2007, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V35, pD51, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkl797
   Barrett JC, 2005, BIOINFORMATICS, V21, P263, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457
   Betel D, 2010, GENOME BIOL, V11, DOI 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r90
   Bhattacharya A, 2014, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V42, pD86, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkt1028
   Björkegren JLM, 2014, PLOS GENET, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004201
   Bruno AE, 2012, BMC GENOMICS, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-44
   Buroker NE, 2012, INT J HEMATOL, V96, P200, DOI 10.1007/s12185-012-1117-7
   Casas-Agustench P, J ACAD NUTR IN PRESS
   Chen R, 2012, PLOS GENET, V8, P100, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002621
   Conde L, 2006, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V34, pW621, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkl071
   Danecek P, 2011, BIOINFORMATICS, V27, P2156, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330
   Dayeh T, 2014, PLOS GENET, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004160
   Gamazon ER, 2012, AM J HUM GENET, V90, P1046, DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.04.023
   Ganesh SK, 2013, CIRCULATION, V128, P2813, DOI 10.1161/01.cir.0000437913.98912.1d
   Gong J, 2012, HUM MUTAT, V33, P254, DOI 10.1002/humu.21641
   Grundberg E, 2012, NAT GENET, V44, P1084, DOI 10.1038/ng.2394
   Haig D, 2011, EUR J HUM GENET, V19, P123, DOI 10.1038/ejhg.2010.161
   Hancock AM, 2008, PLOS GENET, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.0040032
   Hancock AM, 2011, MOL BIOL EVOL, V28, P601, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msq228
   Hariharan M, 2009, BMC BIOINFORMATICS, V10, DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-10-108
   Hashimoto T, 2013, BIOCHEM BIOPH RES CO, V440, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.09.034
   Heneghan HM, 2010, OBES REV, V11, P354, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00659.x
   Hiard S, 2010, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V38, pD640, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkp926
   Innocenti F, 2011, PLOS GENET, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002078
   Isaacs A, 2007, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V92, P2680, DOI 10.1210/jc.2007-0269
   Jeggari A, 2012, BIOINFORMATICS, V28, P2062, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts344
   John B, 2004, PLOS BIOL, V2, P1862, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020363
   Keller KL, 2012, J FOOD SCI, V77, pS143, DOI 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02585.x
   Kertesz M, 2007, NAT GENET, V39, P1278, DOI 10.1038/ng2135
   Khrameeva EE, 2014, NAT COMMUN, V5, DOI 10.1038/ncomms4584
   Kim J, 2014, BMC GENET, V15, DOI 10.1186/1471-2156-15-18
   Kim J, 2009, NAT BIOTECHNOL, V27, P472, DOI 10.1038/nbt.1540
   Krek A, 2005, NAT GENET, V37, P495, DOI 10.1038/ng1536
   Laayouni H, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P2668, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1317723111
   LAI CG, 1994, SCIENCE, V266, P1697, DOI 10.1126/science.7992053
   Lai CQ, 2012, PROG MOL BIOL TRANSL, V108, P461, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-398397-8.00018-6
   Laland KN, 2010, NAT REV GENET, V11, P137, DOI 10.1038/nrg2734
   Lange LA, 2014, AM J HUM GENET, V94, P233, DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.01.010
   Lanktree MB, 2009, GENOME MED, V1, DOI 10.1186/gm28
   Lee Yu-Chi, 2011, J Data Mining Genomics Proteomics, V2
   Levinson RS, 2011, NAT MED, V17
   Lewis BP, 2005, CELL, V120, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035
   Liu CX, 2012, BMC GENOMICS, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-661
   Lu J, 2012, GENOME RES, V22, P1243, DOI 10.1101/gr.132514.111
   Ma L, 2012, PLOS GENET, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002714
   Manolio TA, 2009, NATURE, V461, P747, DOI 10.1038/nature08494
   Mattei J, 2009, BMC GENET, V10, DOI 10.1186/1471-2156-10-45
   Moore JH, 2009, EUR J HUM GENET, V17, P1205, DOI 10.1038/ejhg.2009.39
   Moore KJ, 2011, ANNU REV NUTR, V31, P49, DOI 10.1146/annurev-nutr-081810-160756
   Myles S, 2008, ANN HUM GENET, V72, P99, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2007.00390.x
   Nelson VR, 2010, EPIGENOMICS-UK, V2, P513, DOI 10.2217/EPI.10.26
   Ordovas JM, 2008, OBESITY, V16, pS40, DOI 10.1038/oby.2008.515
   Park HS, 2005, J HUM GENET, V50, P365, DOI 10.1007/s10038-005-0260-x
   Parnell LD, 2010, CURR OPIN LIPIDOL, V21, P116, DOI 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3283378e42
   Pasquali L, 2014, NAT GENET, V46, P136, DOI 10.1038/ng.2870
   Patel CJ, 2013, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V42, P1795, DOI 10.1093/ije/dyt208
   Penas-Steinhardt A, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0050992
   Pybus M, 2014, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V42, pD903, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkt1188
   Raj SM, 2013, BMC GENET, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2156-14-87
   Ramos EM, 2014, EUR J HUM GENET, V22, P144, DOI 10.1038/ejhg.2013.96
   Richardson K, 2011, BMC GENOMICS, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-12-504
   Rosenow A, 2013, BBA-PROTEINS PROTEOM, V1834, P2761, DOI 10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.10.003
   Schadt EE, 2008, PLOS BIOL, V6, P1020, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060107
   Scheinfeldt LB, 2012, GENOME BIOL, V13, DOI 10.1186/gb-2012-13-1-r1
   Shoemaker R, 2010, GENOME RES, V20, P883, DOI 10.1101/gr.104695.109
   Simonson TS, 2012, HUM GENET, V131, P527, DOI 10.1007/s00439-011-1109-3
   Simonson TS, 2010, SCIENCE, V329, P72, DOI 10.1126/science.1189406
   Skibola CF, 2004, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V13, P779
   Solomon BD, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P9851, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1302575110
   Sorlí JV, 2006, CLIN CHIM ACTA, V366, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.cca.2005.10.001
   Stranger BE, 2013, CURR OPIN GENET DEV, V23, P627, DOI 10.1016/j.gde.2013.10.004
   Stranger BE, 2012, PLOS GENET, V8, P272, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002639
   Tachmazidou I, 2013, NAT COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1038/ncomms3872
   Thomas LF, 2011, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V39, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkr414
   Turner SD, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019586
   Udpa N, 2014, GENOME BIOL, V15, DOI 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r36
   van Ommen B, 2014, GENES NUTR, V9, DOI 10.1007/s12263-014-0423-5
   van Vliet-Ostaptchouk Jana V, 2012, Curr Nutr Rep, V1, P184
   Voight BF, 2006, PLOS BIOL, V4, P446, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040072
   Weinberg RB, 1999, GENET EPIDEMIOL, V17, P285, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(199911)17:4<285::AID-GEPI4>3.0.CO;2-3
   Welter D, 2014, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V42, pD1001, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkt1229
   Westra HJ, 2013, NAT GENET, V45, P1238, DOI 10.1038/ng.2756
   Xu Y, 2013, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V310, P948, DOI 10.1001/jama.2013.168118
   Zheng JS, 2014, BMC GENOMICS, V15, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-781
   Zheng JS, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0077442
   Zhi D, 2013, EPIGENETICS-US, V8, P802, DOI 10.4161/epi.25501
   Ziebarth JD, 2012, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V40, pD216, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkr1026
NR 90
TC 52
Z9 57
U1 0
U2 14
PU BMC
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND
SN 1756-0381
J9 BIODATA MIN
JI BioData Min.
PD OCT 26
PY 2014
VL 7
AR 21
DI 10.1186/1756-0381-7-21
PG 20
WC Mathematical & Computational Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Mathematical & Computational Biology
GA AW1CF
UT WOS:000346027600001
PM 25368670
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Nkiaka, E
   Bryant, RG
   Dembélé, M
AF Nkiaka, Elias
   Bryant, Robert G.
   Dembele, Moctar
TI Quantifying Sahel Runoff Sensitivity to Climate Variability, Soil
   Moisture and Vegetation Changes Using Analytical Methods
SO EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Analytical methods; Budyko framework; Elasticity concept; Geospatial
   data; Sahel hydrological paradox; Variable Importance in Projection
ID REMOTE-SENSING DATA; LAND-USE; SURFACE RUNOFF; WATER SCARCITY;
   CATCHMENT; DEGRADATION; UNCERTAINTY; STREAMFLOW; DYNAMICS; IMPACT
AB Whilst substantial efforts have been deployed to understand the "Sahel hydrological paradox", most of the studies focused on small experimental watersheds around the central and western Sahel. To our knowledge, there is no study on this issue covering all the watersheds located within the Sahelian belt. The absence of relevant studies may be attributed to a sparsity of in situ data leading to a dearth of knowledge on the Sahel hydrology. To fill this knowledge gap, the present study leverages analytical methods and freely available geospatial datasets to understand the effects of climatic factors, soil moisture and vegetation cover changes on surface runoff in 45 watersheds located within the Sahelian belt over two decades (2000-2021). Analyses show increasing trends in annual precipitation and potential evapotranspiration (PET) in more than 80% of the watersheds. Surface runoff, soil moisture (SM), and vegetation cover measured using the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) also show increasing trends in all the watersheds. Multivariable linear regression (MLR) analyses reveal that precipitation, PET, SM, and NDVI contribute about 62% of surface runoff variance. Further analyses using MLR, and the partial least squares regression (PLSR) show that precipitation and NDVI are the main factors influencing surface runoff in the Sahel. Elasticity coefficients reveal that a 10% increase in precipitation, SM and NDVI may lead to about 22%, 26% and 45% increase in surface runoff respectively. In contrast, a 10% increase in PET may lead to a 61% decline in surface runoff in the Sahel. This is the first hydrological study covering all the watersheds located within the Sahelian belt with results showing that surface runoff is influenced by climate, SM and NDVI to varying degrees. Given the unique hydrological characteristics of the Sahel, a better understanding of the different factors influencing surface runoff may be crucial for enhancing climate adaptation and ecological restoration efforts in the region such as the Great Green Wall Initiative.
C1 [Nkiaka, Elias; Bryant, Robert G.] Univ Sheffield, Dept Geog, Sheffield S10 2TN, England.
   [Nkiaka, Elias] Univ Lincoln, Dept Geog, Catchments & Coasts Res Grp, Lincoln, England.
   [Dembele, Moctar] Int Water Management Inst IWMI, CSIR Campus,6 Agostino Neto Rd, Accra, Ghana.
   [Dembele, Moctar] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, South Parks Rd, Oxford QY OX1, England.
C3 University of Sheffield; University of Lincoln; CGIAR; International
   Water Management Institute (IWMI); University of Oxford
RP Nkiaka, E (corresponding author), Univ Sheffield, Dept Geog, Sheffield S10 2TN, England.; Nkiaka, E (corresponding author), Univ Lincoln, Dept Geog, Catchments & Coasts Res Grp, Lincoln, England.
EM e.nkiaka@sheffield.ac.uk
RI Dembélé, Moctar/P-7609-2019; Bryant, Robert/C-7737-2009
OI Bryant, Robert/0000-0001-7943-4781
FU Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship [ECF-097-2020]
FX The first author was funded by the Leverhulme Trust Early Career
   Fellowship-Award Number ECF-097-2020.
CR Abdourahamane ZS, 2021, ATMOS RES, V252, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105459
   Abera W, 2019, J ARID ENVIRON, V167, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2019.04.017
   Addor N, 2019, WATER RESOUR RES, V55, P378, DOI 10.1029/2018WR022958
   Avand M, 2021, J HYDROL, V595, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125663
   Baggio G, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V792, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148230
   Budyko M.I., 1974, Climate and Life. International Geophysical Series, V18
   Buechel M, 2022, COMMUN EARTH ENVIRON, V3, DOI 10.1038/s43247-021-00334-0
   Condon LE, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P1117, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-1117-2017
   Creed IF, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P3191, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12615
   Daku EK, 2022, ENVIRON RES COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/ac6073
   Dardel C, 2014, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V6, P3446, DOI 10.3390/rs6043446
   Dembélé M, 2022, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V26, P1481, DOI 10.5194/hess-26-1481-2022
   Dembélé M, 2020, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V24, P5379, DOI 10.5194/hess-24-5379-2020
   Dembéle M, 2020, ADV WATER RESOUR, V143, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103667
   Descroix L, 2009, J HYDROL, V375, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.012
   Descroix L, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10060748
   Dey P, 2017, J HYDROL, V548, P278, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.014
   Didan K., 2015, NASA EOSDIS LAND PRO, DOI DOI 10.5067/MODIS/MOD13Q1.006
   Donohue RJ, 2007, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V11, P983, DOI 10.5194/hess-11-983-2007
   Ebodé VB, 2022, HYDROL RES, DOI 10.2166/nh.2022.047
   Elagib NA, 2021, J HYDROL, V599, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126362
   Fu B.P., 1981, Sci. Atmos. Sin, V5, P23, DOI DOI 10.3878/J.ISSN.1006-9895.1981.01.03
   Funk C, 2015, SCI DATA, V2, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2015.66
   Gal L, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P4591, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-4591-2017
   Gbohoui YP, 2021, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100828
   Gebrechorkos SH, 2022, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101143
   Gebremicael TG, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V660, P1155, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.085
   Greve P, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P486, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0134-9
   Grippa M, 2017, J HYDROMETEOROL, V18, P1847, DOI [10.1175/jhm-d-16-0170.1, 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0170.1]
   Gunkel A, 2017, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V12, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.04.004
   Hasan E, 2018, J HYDROL, V561, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.04.004
   Herrera PA, 2022, WIRES WATER, V9, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1569
   Huntington JL, 2017, B AM METEOROL SOC, V98, P2397, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00324.1
   Ibrahim S, 2021, INT J REMOTE SENS, V42, P567, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2020.1811914
   Jambou R, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph191610105
   Jellason NP, 2021, J ARID ENVIRON, V186, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104398
   Jiang M, 2023, BIG EARTH DATA, V7, P298, DOI 10.1080/20964471.2022.2146632
   Kaptué AT, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P12133, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1509645112
   Kaushik PR, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V151, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110310
   Kendall M. G., 1948, Rank correlation methods.
   Khan Z, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14132033
   Kingston DG, 2020, HYDROL PROCESS, V34, P2292, DOI 10.1002/hyp.13729
   Lebel T, 2009, J HYDROL, V375, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.030
   Lehner B, 2013, HYDROL PROCESS, V27, P2171, DOI 10.1002/hyp.9740
   Li D, 2013, WATER RESOUR RES, V49, P969, DOI 10.1002/wrcr.20107
   Liu D, 2017, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V122, P2218, DOI 10.1002/2016JD025694
   Liu HY, 2022, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V28, P2202, DOI 10.1111/gcb.16059
   Mann HB, 1945, ECONOMETRICA, V13, P245, DOI 10.2307/1907187
   McNally A, 2017, SCI DATA, V4, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2017.12
   Mianabadi A, 2020, J HYDROL, V588, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125089
   Miller J, 2022, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2022.100462
   Mirzabaev A., 2022, Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change., P2195, DOI [10.1017/ 9781009325844.020, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844.020]
   Ndiaye PM, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12071957
   Nkiaka E, 2018, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V32, P1665, DOI 10.1007/s00477-017-1466-0
   Nkiaka E, 2024, HYDROL PROCESS, V38, DOI 10.1002/hyp.15124
   Nkiaka E, 2022, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V26, P5899, DOI 10.5194/hess-26-5899-2022
   Nkiaka E, 2022, HYDROL RES, V53, P336, DOI 10.2166/nh.2022.124
   Odongo RA, 2023, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V23, P2365, DOI 10.5194/nhess-23-2365-2023
   Reaver NGF, 2022, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V26, P1507, DOI 10.5194/hess-26-1507-2022
   Ricciardi L, 2022, PHILOS T R SOC B, V377, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2021.0391
   Sankarasubramanian A, 2001, WATER RESOUR RES, V37, P1771, DOI 10.1029/2000WR900330
   Sanogo S, 2015, INT J CLIMATOL, V35, P4589, DOI 10.1002/joc.4309
   SEN PK, 1968, J AM STAT ASSOC, V63, P1379
   Souverijns N, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12223817
   Tan XJ, 2020, WATER RESOUR RES, V56, DOI 10.1029/2020WR027349
   Taylor CM, 2017, NATURE, V544, P475, DOI 10.1038/nature22069
   Tazen F, 2019, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V12, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12507
   Thomas NP, 2022, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V49, DOI 10.1029/2022GL099872
   Tsai YS, 2017, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V9, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.12.078
   Vizy EK, 2022, CLIM DYNAM, V59, P997, DOI 10.1007/s00382-022-06171-x
   Wamucii CN, 2021, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V25, P5641, DOI 10.5194/hess-25-5641-2021
   Wendling V, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab3dde
   Wu GA, 2023, ECOL MODEL, V477, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110273
   Wu HJ, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-96250-6
   Yonaba R, 2023, CR GEOSCI, V355, P411, DOI 10.5802/crgeos.179
   Yonaba R, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V757, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143792
   Zhang Y. Q., 2023, Nature Water, V1, P261, DOI [DOI 10.1038/S44221-023-00030-7, 10.1038/s44221-023-00030-7]
   Zheng HX, 2009, WATER RESOUR RES, V45, DOI 10.1029/2007WR006665
   Zhou S, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, P38, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-00945-z
   Zoungrana BJB, 2018, J ARID ENVIRON, V153, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2018.01.005
NR 80
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 5
U2 5
PU SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
PI CHAM
PA GEWERBESTRASSE 11, CHAM, CH-6330, SWITZERLAND
SN 2509-9426
EI 2509-9434
J9 EARTH SYST ENVIRON
JI Earth Syst. Environ.
PD 2024 SEP 16
PY 2024
DI 10.1007/s41748-024-00464-3
EA SEP 2024
PG 14
WC Environmental Sciences; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology &
   Atmospheric Sciences
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences
GA G0I0N
UT WOS:001313543100001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Rubuga, FK
   Moraga, P
   Ahmed, A
   Siddig, E
   Remera, E
   Moirano, G
   Cissé, G
   Utzinger, J
AF Rubuga, Felix K.
   Moraga, Paula
   Ahmed, Ayman
   Siddig, Emmanuel
   Remera, Eric
   Moirano, Giovenale
   Cisse, Gueladio
   Utzinger, Jurg
TI Spatio-temporal dynamics of malaria in Rwanda between 2012 and 2022: a
   demography-specific analysis
SO INFECTIOUS DISEASES OF POVERTY
LA English
DT Article
DE Malaria transmission; Epidemiology; Public health; Rwanda;
   Spatio-temporal analysis
ID RISK
AB BackgroundDespite global efforts to reduce and eventually interrupt malaria transmission, the disease remains a pressing public health problem, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. This study presents a detailed spatio-temporal analysis of malaria transmission in Rwanda from 2012 to 2022. The main objective was to gain insights into the evolving patterns of malaria and to inform and tailor effective public health strategies.MethodsThe study used yearly aggregated data of malaria cases from the Rwanda health management information system. We employed a multifaceted analytical approach, including descriptive statistics and spatio-temporal analysis across three demographic groups: children under the age of 5 years, and males and females above 5 years. Bayesian spatially explicit models and spatio scan statistics were utilised to examine geographic and temporal patterns of relative risks and to identify clusters of malaria transmission.ResultsWe observed a significant increase in malaria cases from 2014 to 2018, peaking in 2016 for males and females aged above 5 years with counts of 98,645 and 116,627, respectively and in 2018 for under 5-year-old children with 84,440 cases with notable geographic disparities. Districts like Kamonyi (Southern Province), Ngoma, Kayonza and Bugesera (Eastern Province) exhibited high burdens, possibly influenced by factors such as climate, vector control practices, and cross-border dynamics. Bayesian spatially explicit modeling revealed elevated relative risks in numerous districts, underscoring the heterogeneity of malaria transmission in these districts, and thus contributing to an overall rising trend in malaria cases until 2018, followed by a subsequent decline. Our findings emphasize that the heterogeneity of malaria transmission is potentially driven by ecologic, socioeconomic, and behavioural factors.ConclusionsThe study underscores the complexity of malaria transmission in Rwanda and calls for climate adaptive, gender-, age- and district-specific strategies in the national malaria control program. The emergence of both artemisinin and pyrethoids resistance and persistent high transmission in some districts necessitates continuous monitoring and innovative, data-driven approaches for effective and sustainable malaria control.
C1 [Rubuga, Felix K.; Ahmed, Ayman; Cisse, Gueladio; Utzinger, Jurg] Swiss Trop & Publ Hlth Inst, Allschwil, Switzerland.
   [Rubuga, Felix K.; Ahmed, Ayman; Cisse, Gueladio; Utzinger, Jurg] Univ Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
   [Rubuga, Felix K.] Univ Rwanda, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Kigali, Rwanda.
   [Moraga, Paula] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol, Comp Elect & Math Sci & Engn Div, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
   [Ahmed, Ayman] Univ Khartoum, Inst Endem Dis, Khartoum, Sudan.
   [Siddig, Emmanuel] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus Med Ctr, Dept Med Microbiol & Infect Dis, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
   [Siddig, Emmanuel] Univ Khartoum, Fac Med Lab Sci, Khartoum, Sudan.
   [Remera, Eric] Rwanda Biomed Ctr, Kigali, Rwanda.
   [Moirano, Giovenale] Univ Turin, Dept Med Sci, Turin, Italy.
   [Moirano, Giovenale] Barcelona Supercomp Ctr, Barcelona, Spain.
   [Rubuga, Felix K.] Ctr Impact Innovat & Capac Bldg Hlth Informat Syst, Kigali, Rwanda.
C3 University of Basel; Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute;
   University of Basel; University of Rwanda; King Abdullah University of
   Science & Technology; University of Khartoum; Erasmus University
   Rotterdam; Erasmus MC; University of Khartoum; Rwanda Biomedical Center;
   University of Turin; Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya; Barcelona
   Supercomputer Center (BSC-CNS)
RP Rubuga, FK (corresponding author), Swiss Trop & Publ Hlth Inst, Allschwil, Switzerland.; Rubuga, FK (corresponding author), Univ Basel, Basel, Switzerland.; Rubuga, FK (corresponding author), Univ Rwanda, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Kigali, Rwanda.; Rubuga, FK (corresponding author), Ctr Impact Innovat & Capac Bldg Hlth Informat Syst, Kigali, Rwanda.
EM flxktm86@gmail.com
RI Kitema, Felix/LNQ-4694-2024; Moirano, Giovenale/AAG-7126-2019; Siddig,
   Emmanuel Edwar/K-3466-2016
OI /0000-0001-5266-0201; Kitema Rubuga, Felix/0000-0002-6375-9570; Siddig,
   Emmanuel Edwar/0000-0001-6314-7374
FU University of Basel
FX We extend our deepest gratitude to the Rwanda Biomedical Center for
   their generous and invaluable support in providing essential malaria
   secondary data. This contribution was crucial not only for the
   successful completion of this study but also for enabling a deeper
   understanding of the impact and dynamics of malaria in Rwanda. Their
   collaboration has significantly enriched our research and findings.
CR Adegboye O, 2021, ZOONOSES PUBLIC HLTH, V68, P443, DOI 10.1111/zph.12828
   Asingizwe D, 2019, MALARIA J, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12936-019-2904-x
   Aubourg MA, 2022, MALARIA J, V21, DOI 10.1186/s12936-022-04375-4
   Bizimana JP, 2021, T GIS, V25, P751, DOI 10.1111/tgis.12711
   Colborn KL, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-27537-4
   Coleman M, 2009, MALARIA J, V8, DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-8-68
   Elena N., 2015, A beginners guide to data exploration and visualisation with R
   Giorgi E, 2018, INT STAT REV, V86, P571, DOI 10.1111/insr.12268
   Govoetchan R, 2022, MALARIA J, V21, DOI 10.1186/s12936-022-04336-x
   Hakizimana E, 2018, ACTA TROP, V182, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.02.012
   Hakizimana E, 2016, MALARIA J, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12936-016-1618-6
   Hakizimana E, 2014, MALARIA J, V13, DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-344
   Ingabire CM, 2016, MALARIA J, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12936-016-1285-7
   Kabera M, 2023, AM J TROP MED HYG, V109, P1356, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0317
   Karema C, 2020, MALARIA J, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12936-020-03407-1
   Keiser J, 2005, AM J TROP MED HYG, V72, P392, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.2005.72.392
   Melchior LAK, 2016, GEOSPATIAL HEALTH, V11, P233, DOI 10.4081/gh.2016.443
   Kubana E, 2023, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V23, DOI 10.1186/s12889-023-15104-0
   Lawson AB, 2015, ENVIRONMETRICS, V26, P383, DOI 10.1002/env.2346
   Librero J, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0170480
   McNutt LA, 2003, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V157, P940, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwg074
   Moraga P., 2019, Geospatial Health Data, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429341823
   Moraga P., 2023, Spatial Statistics for Data Science: Theory and Practice with R, DOI [10.1201/9781032641522, DOI 10.1201/9781032641522]
   Moraga P, 2018, R J, V10, P495
   Moraga P, 2017, SPAT SPATIO-TEMPORAL, V23, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.sste.2017.08.001
   National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda, 2023, Fifth Rwanda Population and Housing Census, 2022 Main Indicators Report, P1
   Ngufor C, 2020, MALARIA J, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12936-020-03325-2
   NISR MINECOFIN, 2012, RWAND 4 POP HOUS CEN
   Nzabakiriraho JD, 2021, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V21, DOI 10.1186/s12889-021-10305-x
   Okunlola OA, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-53814-x
   Ostovar A, 2016, J ARTHROPOD-BORNE DI, V10, P222
   Patz JA, 2006, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V103, P5635, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0601493103
   Paul P, 2018, TROP DIS TRAVEL MED, V4, DOI 10.1186/s40794-018-0066-4
   Pebesma E, 2018, R J, V10, P439
   Roger S.Bivand., 2013, APPL SPATIAL DATA AN, Vsecond
   Rue H, 2009, J ROY STAT SOC B, V71, P319, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00700.x
   Rwanda Biomedical Center, 2021, Malaria Matchbox Assessment in Rwanda
   Rwanda Biomedical Center, 2023, Rwanda Malaria Programme Mid Term Review
   Sarpong E, 2022, MALARIA J, V21, DOI 10.1186/s12936-022-04340-1
   Stern DI, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0024524
   Suh PF, 2023, MALARIA J, V22, DOI 10.1186/s12936-023-04444-2
   WHO, 2022, World malaria report 2022
   Wickham H., 2009, ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, DOI [10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3, 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4]
   Wikle CK., 2019, Spatio-Temporal Statistics with R, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781351769723
   World Health Organization, 2023, World malaria report 2023
   Yankson R, 2019, MALARIA J, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12936-019-2709-y
NR 46
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU BMC
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND
SN 2095-5162
EI 2049-9957
J9 INFECT DIS POVERTY
JI Infect. Dis. Poverty
PD SEP 16
PY 2024
VL 13
IS 1
AR 67
DI 10.1186/s40249-024-01237-w
PG 15
WC Infectious Diseases; Parasitology; Tropical Medicine
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Infectious Diseases; Parasitology; Tropical Medicine
GA F8Y4M
UT WOS:001312603100001
PM 39278924
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Challis, A
   Rymer, PD
   Ahrens, CW
   Hardy, G
   Byrne, M
   Ruthrof, KX
   Tissue, T
AF Challis, A.
   Rymer, P. D.
   Ahrens, C. W.
   Hardy, Gesj
   Byrne, M.
   Ruthrof, K. X.
   Tissue, T.
TI Environmental and genetic drivers of physiological and functional traits
   in a key canopy species
SO ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
LA English
DT Article
DE Common garden; Genotype-by-environment; Leaf economic spectrum; Water
   use efficiency; Eucalypt; Local adaptation
ID WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; CARBON-ISOTOPE DISCRIMINATION; PHENOTYPIC
   PLASTICITY; LOCAL ADAPTATION; TRANSPIRATION EFFICIENCY; RAINFALL
   GRADIENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WOOD DENSITY; LEAF; EUCALYPTUS
AB The resilience of forests worldwide is challenged by climate change. Large-scale tree mortality and dieback events have been documented across continents in recent decades. The adaptive capacity of forests is important for predicting forest resistance and resilience to future climates yet remains largely unknown. We grew 12 populations of a widespread foundation tree species (Corymbia calophylla), originating from different temperature and rainfall regimes, in two common garden trials in Western Australia that had similar temperature but contrasting rainfall conditions. We quantified intraspecific trait variation at these two sites to estimate genetically determined trait variation with climate origin (genetic adaptation) and trait variation associated with environment (phenotypic plasticity). We aimed to determine the 1) contribution of genetic and environmental factors on growth, functional, and physiological trait variation; 2) coordination of leaf traits within the context of the leaf economic spectrum (LES) in variable rainfall conditions; and 3) role of local or regional climate adaptation influencing tree growth and water use efficiency. Growth and physiological traits were differentially expressed across populations and sites, highlighting the importance of genetic adaptation and phenotypic plasticity. Leaf traits reflected a more water conservative strategy with higher water use efficiency, high foliar nitrogen content, and low specific leaf area, as predicted by the LES, in trees at the dry site measured in autumn after the warm summer. Local adaptation was detected in growth and leaf water use efficiency traits at the regional climate, not the local population, scale. Plants from the cool region had greater performance than those from the warm region in most plant traits. Home-site rainfall was not a good predictor of trait expression. The capacity of C. calophylla to respond to low water availability through genetic adaptation and phenotypic plasticity may enable it to maintain optimal performance in drier conditions associated with climate change.
C1 [Challis, A.; Rymer, P. D.; Ahrens, C. W.; Tissue, T.] Western Sydney Univ, Hawkesbury Inst Environm, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
   [Ahrens, C. W.] Cesar Australia, Brunswick, Vic 3056, Australia.
   [Hardy, Gesj; Ruthrof, K. X.] Murdoch Univ, Environm & Conservat Sci, 90 South St, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
   [Byrne, M.; Ruthrof, K. X.] Bentley Delivery Ctr, Dept Biodivers Conservat & Attract, Biodivers & Conservat Sci, Locked Bag 104, Bentley, WA 6983, Australia.
   [Tissue, T.] Western Sydney Univ, Global Ctr Land Based Innovat, Hawkesbury Campus,Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 1797, Australia.
C3 Western Sydney University; Murdoch University; Western Sydney University
RP Challis, A (corresponding author), Western Sydney Univ, Hawkesbury Inst Environm, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
EM Anthea.challis91@gmail.com
RI Byrne, Margaret/H-8198-2015
FU Australian Research Council Linkage project [LP150100936, LP100200747];
   Western Australian Government Department of Biodiversity
FX This work was supported by the Australian Research Council Linkage
   project (ID:LP150100936) titled 'Do hotter and drier regions harbor
   adaptive variation for climate change?' with the Western Australian
   Government Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions.
   Establishment of the experimental sites was funded by the Australian
   Research Council Linkage project (ID: LP100200747) .
CR Ahrens CW, 2021, NEW PHYTOL, V229, P1183, DOI 10.1111/nph.16959
   Ahrens CW, 2020, ECOL EVOL, V10, P232, DOI 10.1002/ece3.5890
   Ahrens CW, 2019, EVOL APPL, V12, P1178, DOI 10.1111/eva.12796
   Ahrens CW, 2019, MOL ECOL, V28, P2502, DOI 10.1111/mec.15092
   Aitken SN, 2008, EVOL APPL, V1, P95, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2007.00013.x
   Aitken SN, 2013, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V44, P367, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135747
   Ramírez-Valiente JA, 2011, TREE GENET GENOMES, V7, P285, DOI 10.1007/s11295-010-0331-9
   Ramírez-Valiente JA, 2010, TREE PHYSIOL, V30, P618, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpq013
   Anderegg LDL, 2021, NEW PHYTOL, V229, P1375, DOI 10.1111/nph.16795
   Anderegg LDL, 2018, ECOL LETT, V21, P734, DOI 10.1111/ele.12945
   Aspinwall MJ, 2017, TREE PHYSIOL, V37, P1095, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpx047
   Aspinwall MJ, 2015, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V38, P1752, DOI 10.1111/pce.12424
   Bartholomé J, 2015, NEW PHYTOL, V206, P1437, DOI 10.1111/nph.13301
   Beyer F, 2018, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V32, P1737, DOI 10.1007/s00468-018-1747-3
   Blackman CJ, 2017, TREE PHYSIOL, V37, P583, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpx005
   Blanco-Sánchez M, 2024, J ECOL, V112, P1533, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.14322
   Broeckx LS, 2014, TREE PHYSIOL, V34, P701, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpu057
   Browne L, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P25179, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1908771116
   Cernusak LA, 2013, NEW PHYTOL, V200, P950, DOI 10.1111/nph.12423
   Challis A, 2022, TREE PHYSIOL, V42, P708, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpab096
   Di Matteo G, 2014, J FORESTRY RES, V25, P839, DOI 10.1007/s11676-014-0532-4
   Dillen SY, 2008, ANN BOT-LONDON, V102, P399, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcn107
   Drake JE, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P5069, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13771
   EPRON D, 1995, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V18, P43, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00542.x
   EVANS JR, 1989, OECOLOGIA, V78, P9, DOI 10.1007/BF00377192
   Fajardo A, 2018, ECOLOGY, V99, P1024, DOI 10.1002/ecy.2194
   FARQUHAR GD, 1984, AUST J PLANT PHYSIOL, V11, P539, DOI 10.1071/PP9840539
   Geber MA, 2003, INT J PLANT SCI, V164, pS21, DOI 10.1086/368233
   Grivet D, 2011, MOL BIOL EVOL, V28, P101, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msq190
   Grossnickle SC, 2005, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V19, P32, DOI 10.1007/s00468-004-0360-9
   GUEHL JM, 1995, NEW PHYTOL, V131, P149, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb05716.x
   Hacke UG, 2001, OECOLOGIA, V126, P457, DOI 10.1007/s004420100628
   HUBICK KT, 1988, AUST J PLANT PHYSIOL, V15, P799, DOI 10.1071/PP9880799
   Kawecki TJ, 2004, ECOL LETT, V7, P1225, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00684.x
   Kohn MJ, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P19691, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1004933107
   Lázaro-Nogal A, 2016, OECOLOGIA, V180, P1075, DOI 10.1007/s00442-015-3514-0
   Leimu R, 2008, PLOS ONE, V3, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0004010
   Li CY, 2000, AUST J PLANT PHYSIOL, V27, P231
   Liu ZL, 2020, FUNCT ECOL, V34, P458, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13498
   López R, 2021, NEW PHYTOL, V230, P497, DOI 10.1111/nph.17185
   López R, 2013, ANN BOT-LONDON, V111, P1167, DOI 10.1093/aob/mct084
   Mcfarlane Don, 2020, Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, V103, P9
   McLean EH, 2014, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V37, P1440, DOI 10.1111/pce.12251
   Moles AT, 2014, J VEG SCI, V25, P1167, DOI 10.1111/jvs.12190
   Nicotra AB, 2010, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V15, P684, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.008
   Niinemets U, 1998, TREE PHYSIOL, V18, P681
   Niinemets Ü, 2001, ECOLOGY, V82, P453, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0453:GSCCOL]2.0.CO;2
   Nolan RH, 2017, FUNCT PLANT BIOL, V44, P1134, DOI 10.1071/FP17079
   O'Brien EK, 2010, RESTOR ECOL, V18, P359, DOI 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00453.x
   Poorter H, 2009, NEW PHYTOL, V182, P565, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02830.x
   Prober Suzanne M., 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, V128, P40, DOI 10.1071/RS16004
   Ramírez-Valiente JA, 2022, J ECOL, V110, P1022, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13730
   READ J, 1991, FUNCT ECOL, V5, P684, DOI 10.2307/2389489
   Rosas T, 2019, NEW PHYTOL, V223, P632, DOI 10.1111/nph.15684
   Roussel M, 2009, J EXP BOT, V60, P2419, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erp100
   Rumman R, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P1186, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13911
   Rymer PD, 2010, MOL ECOL, V19, P4765, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04794.x
   Sampson J, 2018, BIOL J LINN SOC, V123, P545, DOI 10.1093/biolinnean/blx168
   Schneider CA, 2012, NAT METHODS, V9, P671, DOI 10.1038/nmeth.2089
   Sommer RJ, 2020, GENETICS, V215, P1, DOI 10.1534/genetics.120.303163
   Steane DA, 2017, BIOL J LINN SOC, V121, P484, DOI 10.1093/biolinnean/blw051
   STEWART GR, 1995, AUST J PLANT PHYSIOL, V22, P51, DOI 10.1071/PP9950051
   Swenson NG, 2007, AM J BOT, V94, P451, DOI 10.3732/ajb.94.3.451
   TERASHIMA I, 1995, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V18, P1111, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00623.x
   van Ommen Kloeke AEE, 2012, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V21, P224, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00667.x
   Vitasse Y, 2014, FUNCT ECOL, V28, P243, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12161
   Werden LK, 2018, TREE PHYSIOL, V38, P517, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpx135
   Wright IJ, 2004, NATURE, V428, P821, DOI 10.1038/nature02403
   Wright IJ, 2005, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V14, P411, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-822x.2005.00172.x
   Wright IJ, 2001, FUNCT ECOL, V15, P423, DOI 10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00542.x
   ZHANG J, 1994, CAN J FOREST RES, V24, P92, DOI 10.1139/x94-014
NR 71
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 9
U2 9
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0098-8472
EI 1873-7307
J9 ENVIRON EXP BOT
JI Environ. Exp. Bot.
PD OCT
PY 2024
VL 226
AR 105904
DI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2024.105904
EA JUL 2024
PG 10
WC Plant Sciences; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA ZP3Z4
UT WOS:001276473900001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Carbajal-de-la-Fuente, AL
   Piccinali, R
   Porcasi, X
   Marti, GA
   Arias, ARD
   Abrahan, L
   Suárez, FC
   Lobbia, P
   Medina, G
   Provecho, Y
   Cortez, MR
   Soria, N
   Gonçalves, TC
   Nattero, J
AF Carbajal-de-la-Fuente, Ana Laura
   Piccinali, Romina, V
   Porcasi, Ximena
   Marti, Gerardo Anibal
   Arias, Antonieta Rojas de
   Abrahan, Luciana
   Suarez, Florencia Cano
   Lobbia, Patricia
   Medina, Gabriela
   Provecho, Yael
   Cortez, Mirko Rojas
   Soria, Nicolas
   Goncalves, Teresa C.
   Nattero, Julieta
TI Variety is the spice: The role of morphological variation of Triatoma
   infestans (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) at a macro-scale
SO ACTA TROPICA
LA English
DT Article
DE Argentina; Triatoma infestans; Climatic adaptation; Geometric
   morphometry; Wing; Vector ecology
ID CHAGAS-DISEASE VECTOR; BODY-SIZE; PHENOTYPIC VARIABILITY;
   POPULATION-GENETICS; SPECIES RICHNESS; GENOMIC CHANGES; MAIN VECTOR;
   PLASTICITY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; HETEROPTERA
AB Chagas disease is caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas, 1909). One of the primary vectors of T. cruzi in South America is Triatoma infestans (Klug, 1834 ) . This triatomine species is distributed across a huge latitudinal gradient, inhabiting domiciliary , peridomiciliary , and wild environments. Its wide geographic distribution provides an excellent opportunity to study the relationships between environmental gradients and intraspecific morphological variation. In this study, we investigated variations in wing size and shape in T. infestans across six ecoregions. We aimed to address the following questions: How do wing size and shape vary on a regional scale, does morphological variation follow specific patterns along an environmental or latitudinal gradient, and what environmental factors might contribute to wing variation? Geometric morphometric methods were applied to the wings of 162 females belonging to 21 T. infestans populations, 13 from Argentina ( n = 105), 5 from Bolivia ( n = 42), and 3 from Paraguay ( n = 15). A comparison of wing centroid size across the 21 populations showed significant differences. Canonical Variate Analysis (CVA) revealed significant differences in wing shape between the populations from Argentina, Bolivia, and Paraguay, although there was a considerable overlap, especially among the Argentinian populations. Well -structured populations were observed for the Bolivian and Paraguayan groups. Two analyses were performed to assess the association between wing size and shape, geographic and climatic variables: multiple linear regression analysis (MRA) for size and Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression for shape. The MRA showed a significant general model fit. Six temperature -related variables, one precipitation -related variable, and the latitude showed significant associations with wing size. The PLS analysis revealed a significant correlation between wing shape with latitude, longitude, temperaturerelated, and rainfall -related variables. Wing size and shape in T. infestans populations varied across geographic distribution. Our findings demonstrate that geographic and climatic variables significantly influence T. infestans wing morphology.
C1 [Carbajal-de-la-Fuente, Ana Laura] Ctr Nacl Diagnost Invest Endemoepidemias CENDIE AN, Av Paseo Colon 568,Paseo Colon 568, RA-1063 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
   [Carbajal-de-la-Fuente, Ana Laura; Lobbia, Patricia] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn CONICET, Godoy Cruz 2290, RA-1425 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
   [Piccinali, Romina, V; Nattero, Julieta] UBA, DEGE FCEN, Lab Ecoepidemiol, IEGEBA UBA CONICET, Intendente Guiraldes 2160,Ciudad Univ Pabellon 2, RA-1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
   [Porcasi, Ximena] Inst Gulich CONAE UNC, Ruta C45 Km 8, RA-5187 Cordoba, Argentina.
   [Marti, Gerardo Anibal] CCT La Plata CONICET UNLP Asociado CIC, Ctr Estudios Parasitol & Vectores CEPAVEC, Blvd 120 & 60, RA-1900 La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
   [Arias, Antonieta Rojas de] Ctr Desarrollo Invest Cient CEDIC, Manduvi 635 Entre 15 Agosto y Oleary, Asuncion 1255, Paraguay.
   [Abrahan, Luciana] UNCa, Ctr Reg Invest Cient & Transferencia Tecnol La Rio, CONICET, UNLAR,SEGEMAR, Entre Rios & Mendoza S-N, RA-5301 La Rioja, Provincia De La, Argentina.
   [Suarez, Florencia Cano] Minist Salud Publ, Programa Prov Control Vectores, Santa Fe 977 Este Predio Hosp Dr Guillermo Rawson, RA-5400 San Juan, Argentina.
   [Lobbia, Patricia] Ctr Nacl Diagnost & Invest Endemoepidemias CeNDIE, Unidad Operat Vectores & Ambiente UNOVE, Pabellon S-N, RA-2423 Cordoba, Argentina.
   [Medina, Gabriela] Minist Salud Catamarca, Lab Entomol & Parasitol, Direccio Control Integral Vectores & Zoonosis n, Chacabuco 169, RA-4700 San Fernando Del Valle De, Argentina.
   [Provecho, Yael] Minist Salud Nacio, Direcc Control Enfermedades Transmitidas Vectores, Ave 9 Julio 1925, RA-1073 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
   [Cortez, Mirko Rojas] Argentina Fundacio Salud Nat Integral SANIT, Pasaje Fidelia de Sanchez 433, Cochabamba 00591, Bolivia.
   [Soria, Nicolas; Goncalves, Teresa C.] Minist Salud Prov Cordoba, Dept Zoonosis, Div Manejo Integrado Vectores, Direcc Jurisdicc Epidemiol, Santiago Caceres 1885, RA-5000 Cordoba, Argentina.
   [Goncalves, Teresa C.] Lab Interdisciplinar Vigilancia Entomol Diptera He, Inst Oswaldo Cruz IOC Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Ave Brasil 4365, BR-21040360 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
C3 University of Buenos Aires; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones
   Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET)
RP Carbajal-de-la-Fuente, AL (corresponding author), Ctr Nacl Diagnost Invest Endemoepidemias CENDIE AN, Av Paseo Colon 568,Paseo Colon 568, RA-1063 Buenos Aires, Argentina.; Carbajal-de-la-Fuente, AL (corresponding author), Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn CONICET, Godoy Cruz 2290, RA-1425 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
EM analaura.carbajal@gmail.com
RI FUENTE, ANA/X-3988-2018; Piccinali, Romina/KHE-0140-2024
OI Piccinali, Romina/0000-0003-3198-6039; Carbajal de la Fuente, Ana
   Laura/0000-0003-0809-3507
FU National Researchers Incentive Program (PRONII) of the CONACyT
FX We thank specialized technicians from national and provincial pro-grams
   of control vectors for their collaboration during the field samplings.
   We are grateful to Lucia Babino (IEGEBA-CONICET) for her advice on
   statistical analysis; Abel Perez Gonzalez for helpful discussions and
   critical reading. ARA thanks the National Researchers Incentive Program
   (PRONII) of the CONACyT, Paraguay. Thank you to the Re-viewers for their
   invaluable feedback which greatly contributed to the enhancement of our
   manuscript.
CR Abad-Franch F, 2021, ENTOMOL FOCUS, P387, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-64548-9_16
   Angilletta MJ, 2009, BIO HABIT, P1, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570875.001.1
   Ascarrunz E, 2019, PEERJ, V7, DOI 10.7717/peerj.7476
   Badejo O, 2020, OECOLOGIA, V194, P27, DOI 10.1007/s00442-020-04738-1
   Bai Y, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep32680
   Bargues MD, 2006, INFECT GENET EVOL, V6, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.meegid.2005.01.006
   Batista VSP, 2013, MED VET ENTOMOL, V27, P247, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2012.01043.x
   BOOKSTEIN FL, 1991, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V511, P326, DOI 10.1007/BFb0033763
   Boumaza M, 2022, INSECTS, V13, DOI 10.3390/insects13111031
   de Lafuente ALC, 2011, MED VET ENTOMOL, V25, P178, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2010.00912.x
   Ceccarelli Soledad, 2022, GigaByte, V2022, pgigabyte62, DOI 10.46471/gigabyte.62
   Ceccarelli S, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2018.71
   Chambers JM., 2008, Software for data analysis : programming with R, DOI [10.1007/978-0-387-75936-4, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-75936-4]
   Chown S., 2004, Insect physiological ecology: mechanisms and patterns
   Chown SL, 2010, BIOL REV, V85, P139, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00097.x
   Correa R.D., 1977, Revista Brasileira de Malariologia e Doencas Tropicais, P23
   Coscaron Maria del Carmen, 1999, P891
   Costa J, 2009, INFECT GENET EVOL, V9, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.12.005
   CUSHMAN JH, 1993, OECOLOGIA, V95, P30, DOI 10.1007/BF00649503
   Davidowitz G, 2004, EVOL ECOL RES, V6, P49
   de Arias AR, 2022, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V117, DOI 10.1590/0074-02760210130
   De La Vega GJ, 2018, MED VET ENTOMOL, V32, P1, DOI 10.1111/mve.12262
   de la Vega GJ, 2015, ECOGRAPHY, V38, P851, DOI 10.1111/ecog.01028
   de Oliveira J, 2023, REV SOC BRAS MED TRO, V56, DOI 10.1590/0037-8682-0150-2023
   Di Rienzo J., 2016, INFOSTAT VERSION 201
   Dinerstein E, 2017, BIOSCIENCE, V67, P534, DOI 10.1093/biosci/bix014
   Dudley R, 2018, ARTHROPOD STRUCT DEV, V47, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.asd.2018.06.006
   Dujardin JP, 2009, ACTA TROP, V110, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.09.026
   Dujardin J.P., 2007, Modern Methodol, P435, DOI [10.1002/9780470114209.ch25, DOI 10.1002/9780470114209.CH25]
   Dujardin JP, 1999, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V94, P223, DOI 10.1590/S0074-02761999000700036
   Eberhard FE, 2020, ELIFE, V9, DOI 10.7554/eLife.52072
   Fiad FG, 2022, ACTA TROP, V232, DOI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106488
   Fox CW, 1997, AM NAT, V149, P149, DOI 10.1086/285983
   Gigena GV, 2023, PARASITE VECTOR, V16, DOI 10.1186/s13071-022-05570-7
   Gorla D, 2017, AMERICAN TRYPANOSOMIASIS CHAGAS DISEASE: ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF RESEARCH, 2ND EDITION, P197, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-801029-7.00009-5
   Gorla David E, 2002, Ecol. austral, V12, P117
   Hernández L, 2008, ACTA TROP, V106, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.01.006
   Jolliffe I.T., 1986, Principal component analysis, VSecond
   Kamimura E.H., 2020, Parasit. Vect., V13, P1
   Klingenberg CP, 2016, DEV GENES EVOL, V226, P113, DOI 10.1007/s00427-016-0539-2
   Klingenberg CP, 2011, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V11, P353, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x
   Kuhn M, 2008, J STAT SOFTW, V28, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v028.i05
   Kumar S, 2018, MOL BIOL EVOL, V35, P1547, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msy096
   LACHENBRUCH PA, 1967, BIOMETRICS, V23, P639, DOI 10.2307/2528418
   Lardeux F., 2023, bioRxiv, DOI [10.1101/2023.08.31.555655,2023-08, DOI 10.1101/2023.08.31.555655,2023-08]
   LENT H, 1979, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, V163, P123
   Levy RA, 2015, OIKOS, V124, P610, DOI 10.1111/oik.01615
   Makarieva AM, 2005, OIKOS, V111, P425, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2005.14095.x
   Gonçalves TCM, 2013, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V108, P429, DOI 10.1590/S0074-0276108042013006
   Monteiro FA, 1999, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V94, P229, DOI 10.1590/S0074-02761999000700037
   Montejo-Kovacevich G, 2019, EVOLUTION, V73, P2436, DOI 10.1111/evo.13865
   de Souza RDM, 2022, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V117, DOI 10.1590/0074-02760200479
   Nattero J., 2017, Parasit. Vect., V10, P1
   Nattero J, 2023, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2023.1211219
   Nattero J, 2021, PARASITE VECTOR, V14, DOI 10.1186/s13071-021-04857-5
   Nattero J, 2020, PARASITE VECTOR, V13, DOI 10.1186/s13071-020-3912-y
   Nattero J, 2019, INFECT GENET EVOL, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.meegid.2019.103925
   Nattero J, 2013, INFECT GENET EVOL, V19, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.06.014
   Fergnani PN, 2013, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V108, P997, DOI 10.1590/0074-0276130369
   Nylin S, 1998, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V43, P63, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.63
   Olson DM, 2001, BIOSCIENCE, V51, P933, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2
   Panzera F, 2004, EMERG INFECT DIS, V10, P438, DOI 10.3201/eid1003.020812
   Paschoaletto L, 2022, ANIMALS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/ani12111362
   Piccinali RV, 2009, J MED ENTOMOL, V46, P796, DOI 10.1603/033.046.0410
   Pigliucci M, 2005, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V20, P481, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2005.06.001
   Pita S, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0181635
   QGIS Development Team, 2022, QGIS Geographic Information System
   Quisberth S, 2011, INFECT GENET EVOL, V11, P1006, DOI 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.03.014
   Rodriguero MS, 2004, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V13, P75, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-882X.2004.00071.x
   ROFF D, 1980, OECOLOGIA, V45, P202, DOI 10.1007/BF00346461
   Rohlf FJ, 1999, J CLASSIF, V16, P197, DOI 10.1007/s003579900054
   Rosenberg MS, 2011, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V2, P229, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00081.x
   Correia JPSO, 2022, INSECTS, V13, DOI 10.3390/insects13070591
   Shelomi M, 2012, AM NAT, V180, P511, DOI 10.1086/667595
   Sherpa S, 2019, EVOLUTION, V73, P1793, DOI 10.1111/evo.13801
   Szumlewicz A.P., 1975, Am. Trypanosomiasis Res., V74, P63
   Tseng M, 2019, ECOL ENTOMOL, V44, P151, DOI 10.1111/een.12684
   Varian CP, 2023, ECOSPHERE, V14, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.4347
   Vendrami DP, 2017, INFECT GENET EVOL, V49, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.12.031
   Vilaseca C, 2020, INSECTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/insects11050274
   Villacís AG, 2010, J MED ENTOMOL, V47, P1034, DOI 10.1603/ME10053
   Walters RJ, 2006, AM NAT, V167, P510, DOI 10.1086/501029
   Zhao YS, 2023, INSECTS, V14, DOI 10.3390/insects14050450
   Zheng XL, 2015, ACTA ZOOL-STOCKHOLM, V96, P242, DOI 10.1111/azo.12072
NR 84
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0001-706X
EI 1873-6254
J9 ACTA TROP
JI Acta Trop.
PD AUG
PY 2024
VL 256
AR 107239
DI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2024.107239
EA MAY 2024
PG 12
WC Parasitology; Tropical Medicine
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Parasitology; Tropical Medicine
GA UE3L3
UT WOS:001246345000001
PM 38735448
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Mah, A
   Aragón, C
   Markowitz, E
AF Mah, Andrea
   Aragon, Carolina
   Markowitz, Ezra
TI Visualizing Hope: Investigating the Effect of Public Art on Risk
   Perception and Awareness of Climate Adaptation
SO WEATHER CLIMATE AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Social science; Communications/decision-making; Experimental design
ID OVERCOMING BARRIERS; WIND ENERGY; CHALLENGES; ACCEPTANCE
AB To support human flourishing in a climate -changed world, individuals and communities will have to take costly and challenging adaptation actions. Although there is evidence of increasing public concern over climate change, current levels of engagement and adaptation action remain insufficient. There is a need for innovative ways to bring individuals and communities into the climate movement. Public art installations that creatively communicate relevant aspects of the problem may represent one largely untapped pathway to greater levels of engagement. Here, we examined how virtual exposure to a public art installation, FutureSHORELINE, impacted climate change risk perceptions, attitudes, behaviors, and emotions. The installation depicted sea level rise impacts and solutions for a shoreline area in Boston, Massachusetts. In study 1 (N = 474), participants were randomly assigned to view the art in different formats: video, stills, or 3608 viewers. Exposure to this installation, in any format, was associated with greater perceived risk of climate change, feelings of personal responsibility to address climate change, and likelihood of engaging in community -led initiatives related to climate change as compared with pre -art -exposure levels. In study 2 (N = 294), the video was compared, with and without text, with a no -information control. This study revealed that the video impacted emotional reactions to climate change. Public art installations may present a model by which to make information about the local impacts of climate change and proposed adaptation solutions visible to diverse audiences, providing a novel way to increase public concern and engagement. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: While much climate change art has been created, efforts to systematically evaluate its impacts are sparse. The purpose of this work was to examine how viewing a landscape installation impacted climate change and sea level rise perceptions. Across two studies, we evaluated the impacts of viewing a Boston (Massachusetts)based landscape installation depicting the impacts of, and a solution to, sea level rise and flooding. Our results highlight the potential usefulness of art as a means of communicating about climate change.
C1 [Mah, Andrea] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Amherst, MA 01003 USA.
   [Mah, Andrea; Markowitz, Ezra] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Environm Conservat, Amherst, MA 01003 USA.
   [Aragon, Carolina] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Landscape Architecture & Reg Planning, Amherst, MA USA.
C3 University of Massachusetts System; University of Massachusetts Amherst;
   University of Massachusetts System; University of Massachusetts Amherst;
   University of Massachusetts System; University of Massachusetts Amherst
RP Mah, A (corresponding author), Univ Massachusetts, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Amherst, MA 01003 USA.; Mah, A (corresponding author), Univ Massachusetts, Dept Environm Conservat, Amherst, MA 01003 USA.
EM amah@umass.edu
RI Mah, Andrea/LRV-7579-2024
OI Mah, Andrea/0000-0002-4680-9396
FU University of Massachusetts Amherst (Faculty Research Grant, Social
   Science and Environment Network Seed Grant and Institute of Diversity
   Sciences Seed Grant); Fort Point Arts Community Operations Board; State
   Street Bank
FX This research work and the construction of FutureSHORELINE was supported
   by grants from the University of Massachusetts Amherst (Faculty Research
   Grant, Social Science and Environment Network Seed Grant and Institute
   of Diversity Sciences Seed Grant) , and the Fort Point Arts Community
   Operations Board and State Street Bank. The authors have no conflicts of
   interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
   The research presented here was reviewed and approved by the University
   of Massachusetts Institutional Review Board, protocol 1834. Informed
   consent was obtained electronically from all participants of the study.
   Participants consented to have their data shared publicly in aggregate
   and unidentifiable forms. All authors participated in the conception and
   design of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of the data.
   The paper was drafted by author Mah and critically revised by authors
   Aragon and Markowitz.
CR [Anonymous], 2016, Climate Ready Boston
   [Anonymous], 2018, Coastal resilience solutions for South Boston
   Aragón C, 2021, C&C'21: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH CONFERENCE ON CREATIVITY AND COGNITION, DOI 10.1145/3450741.3465259
   Aragón C, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V189, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.03.014
   Barnett AG, 2005, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V34, P215, DOI 10.1093/ije/dyh299
   Bell James., 2021, Response to Climate Change, Citizens in Advanced Economies Are Willing To Alter How They Live and Work
   Bergquist M, 2019, FRONT PSYCHOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00220
   Bishop Claire., 2005, INSTALLATION ART
   Bloodhart B, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0141526
   Bonnemaison Sarah., 2009, INSTALLATIONS ARCHIT
   Braun V, 2012, APA HDB RES METHODS, V2, P57
   Cain BE, 2020, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V197, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105298
   Deci E.L., 2015, International Encyclopedia of the Social Behavioral Sciences, V21, P486, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26036-4, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26036-4, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26036-4]
   Delmotte V. Masson, 2021, Summary for policymakers. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, P3
   Eisenack K, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P867, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2350
   Ekstrom JA, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V9, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2014.06.002
   Galafassi D, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V31, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.12.010
   Giannachi G, 2012, LEONARDO, V45, P124, DOI 10.1162/LEON_a_00278
   Gifford R, 2011, AM PSYCHOL, V66, P290, DOI 10.1037/a0023566
   Gustafson A, 2020, COMMUN REP, V33, P121, DOI 10.1080/08934215.2020.1799049
   Hamin EM, 2014, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V80, P110, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2014.949590
   Hayward B, 2008, POLIT SCI, V60, P47, DOI 10.1177/003231870806000105
   Holmes T, 2007, CC2007-CREATIVITY AND COGNITION 2007 SEEDING CREATIVITY: TOOLS, MEDIA, AND ENVIRONMENTS, P153
   Howe PD, 2021, CURR OPIN BEHAV SCI, V42, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.05.005
   Inwood H., 2008, Canadian journal of environmental education, V13, P29
   Jay A.K., 2023, Fifth National Climate Assessment, DOI [DOI 10.7930/NCA5.2023.CH1, https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA5.2023.CH1]
   Joslyn S, 2021, FRONT COMP SCI-SWITZ, V2, DOI 10.3389/fcomp.2020.590232
   Lindeman KC, 2015, COAST MANAGE, V43, P555, DOI 10.1080/08920753.2015.1075282
   Litman L, 2017, BEHAV RES METHODS, V49, P433, DOI 10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z
   Marín-Morales J, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0223881
   Markowitz E.M., 2018, Psychology and Climate Change: Human Perceptions, Impacts, and Responses, P35, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-813130-5.00003-5, 10.1016/B978-0-12-813130-5.00003-5, 10.1016/b978-0-12-813130-5.00003-5]
   McKibben Bill., 2005, Grist
   McMichael C, 2021, POPUL ENVIRON, V43, P82, DOI 10.1007/s11111-021-00378-6
   Mochizuki Y., 2015, Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, V9, P4, DOI [10.1177/0973408215569109, DOI 10.1177/0973408215569109]
   Monacella R., 2015, KERB 23 Digital Landscapes, P14
   Moser SC, 2016, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V7, P345, DOI 10.1002/wcc.403
   Moser SC, 2010, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V1, P31, DOI 10.1002/wcc.11
   Mycoo M, 2014, NAT RESOUR FORUM, V38, P47, DOI 10.1111/1477-8947.12033
   Nadav-Greenberg L, 2008, J COGN ENG DECIS MAK, V2, P24, DOI 10.1518/155534308X284354
   Nurmis J, 2016, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V7, P501, DOI 10.1002/wcc.400
   O'Neill SJ, 2014, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V5, P73, DOI 10.1002/wcc.249
   Petrova MA, 2013, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V4, P575, DOI 10.1002/wcc.250
   Piggott-McKellar AE, 2019, LOCAL ENVIRON, V24, P374, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2019.1580688
   Rand J, 2017, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V29, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.019
   Roosen LiselotteJ., 2018, World Art, V8, P85, DOI [10.1080/21500894.2017.1375002, DOI 10.1080/21500894.2017.1375002]
   Rovira R., 2016, Innovations in Landscape Architecture, P223
   Rulleau B, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V72, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.01.009
   Savelli S, 2013, APPL COGNITIVE PSYCH, V27, P527, DOI 10.1002/acp.2932
   Sheppard S. R. J., 2012, Visualizing climate change: a guide to visual communication of climate change and developing local solutions
   Sheppard SRJ, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V142, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.07.006
   Shi LD, 2021, SCIENCE, V372, P1408, DOI 10.1126/science.abc8054
   Smith P., 2015, CLIMATE CHANGE SOCIA, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781316217269, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781316217269]
   Sommer LK, 2021, PSYCHOL AESTHET CREA, V15, P60, DOI 10.1037/aca0000247
   Sommer LK, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101992
   Sundar SS, 2015, INT J HUM-COMPUT INT, V31, P385, DOI 10.1080/10447318.2015.1033912
   Syropoulos S, 2023, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102006
   Syropoulos S, 2022, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101868
   Wolsko C, 2017, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V51, P284, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.04.005
   Wolsko C, 2016, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V65, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.005
NR 59
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 6
U2 9
PU AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
PI BOSTON
PA 45 BEACON ST, BOSTON, MA 02108-3693, UNITED STATES
SN 1948-8327
EI 1948-8335
J9 WEATHER CLIM SOC
JI Weather Clim. Soc.
PD JAN-MAR
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 1
BP 185
EP 204
DI 10.1175/WCAS-D-23-0081.1
PG 20
WC Environmental Studies; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA JB1O3
UT WOS:001170603900001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Fufa, TW
   Menamo, TM
   Abtew, WG
   Amadi, CO
   Oselebe, HO
AF Fufa, Tilahun Wondimu
   Menamo, Temesgen Matiwos
   Abtew, Wosene Gebreselassie
   Amadi, Charles Okechukwu
   Oselebe, Happiness Ogba
TI Detection of the local adaptive and genome-wide associated loci in
   southeast Nigerian taro (<i>Colocasia esculenta</i> (L.) Schott)
   populations
SO BMC GENOMICS
LA English
DT Article
DE Genome-environment association; Genome-traits association; Nigerian taro
ID MYB TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; STRESS RESPONSES; ADAPTATION; MARKERS; SCANS
AB BackgroundTaro has a long history of being consumed and remains orphan and on the hand Nigeria farmers. The role of farmer-driven artificial selection is not negligible to fit landraces to a particular ecological condition. Limited study has been conducted on genome-wide association and no study has been conducted on genome-environment association for clinal adaptation for taro. Therefore, the objective of this study was to detect loci that are associated with environmental variables and phenotype traits and forward input to breeders. The study used 92 geographical referred taro landraces collected from Southeast (SE) Nigeria.ResultsThe result indicates that SE Nigerian taro has untapped phenotype and genetic variability with low admixture. Redundancy analysis indicated that collinear explained SNP variation more than single climatic variable. Overall, the results indicated that no single method exclusively was able to capture population confounding effects better than the others for all six traits. Nevertheless, based on overall model performance, Blink seemed to provide slight advantage over other models and was selected for all subsequent assessment of genome-environment association (GEA) and genome-wide association study (GWAS) models. Genome scan and GEA identified local adapted loci and co-located genes. A total of nine SNP markers associated with environmental variables. Some of the SNP markers (such as S_101024366) co-located with genes which previously reported for climatic adaptation such as astringency, diaminopimelate decarboxylase and MYB transcription factor. Genome-wide association also identified 45, 40 and 34 significant SNP markers associated with studied traits in combined, year 1 and year 2 data sets, respectively. Out of these, five SNP markers (S1_18891752 S3_100795476, S1_100584471 S1_100896936 and S2_10058799) were consistent in two different data sets.ConclusionsThe findings from this study improve our understanding of the genetic control of adaptive and phenotypic traits in Nigerian taro. However, the study suggests further study on identification of local adaptive loci and GWAS through collection of more landraces throughout the country, and across different agro-ecologies.
C1 [Fufa, Tilahun Wondimu] Oromia Agr Res Inst, Dept Hort, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
   [Fufa, Tilahun Wondimu; Oselebe, Happiness Ogba] Ebonyi State Univ, Dept Crop Prod & Landscape Management, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
   [Menamo, Temesgen Matiwos; Abtew, Wosene Gebreselassie] Jimma Univ, Dept Plant Sci & Hort, Jimma, Ethiopia.
   [Amadi, Charles Okechukwu] Natl Root Crops Res Inst, Cocoyam Improvement Programme, Umudike, Nigeria.
C3 Jimma University
RP Menamo, TM (corresponding author), Jimma Univ, Dept Plant Sci & Hort, Jimma, Ethiopia.
EM temesgen2008@hotmail.com
RI Abtew, Wosene/AGA-2189-2022; Menamo, Temesgen Matiwos/AAI-2042-2019
OI Menamo, Temesgen Matiwos/0000-0003-4856-3147; Abtew, Wosene
   Gebreselassie/0000-0002-7628-0059
FU Intra-Africa Mobility Scheme through Mobreed project; Education,
   Audio-visual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) of the European
   Commission [2016-2988]
FX This work was supported by Intra-Africa Mobility Scheme through Mobreed
   project. Mr. Tilahun Wondimu Fufa, from the Oromia Agricultural Research
   Institute, Ethiopia is a scholar of the "Intra-Africa Academic Mobility
   Scheme" under the project grant number 2016-2988 on "Enhancing training
   and research mobility for novel crops breeding in Africa (MoBreed)"
   funded by the Education, Audio-visual and Culture Executive Agency
   (EACEA) of the European Commission. The project provided a scholarship
   for academic training and research mobility and a research grant to the
   first Author to complete a Ph.D. degree at Ebonyi State University
   (Nigeria)
CR Abebe TD, 2015, FRONT PLANT SCI, V6, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00813
   Agriculture I.I.f.T., 1990, DESCR TAR COL SPP
   Amadi C, 2012, NIGERIA AGR J, V43, P8
   Amadi CO, 2015, J CROP IMPROV, V29, P106, DOI 10.1080/15427528.2014.980023
   Awika JM, 2004, PHYTOCHEMISTRY, V65, P1199, DOI 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.04.001
   Bates D, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V67, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Bellinger MR, 2020, G3-GENES GENOM GENET, V10, P2763, DOI 10.1534/g3.120.401367
   BENJAMINI Y, 1995, J R STAT SOC B, V57, P289, DOI 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
   Bi HH, 2016, J EXP BOT, V67, P5363, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erw298
   Bradbury PJ, 2007, BIOINFORMATICS, V23, P2633, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308
   Browning BL, 2018, AM J HUM GENET, V103, P338, DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.07.015
   Caye K, 2019, MOL BIOL EVOL, V36, P852, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msz008
   Chaïr H, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI [10.1371/journal.pone.0157712, 10.13]
   Chrysafides S.M., 2021, Physiology, Resting Potential
   Cinar O, 2022, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V13, P383, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.13760
   Dipaloke Mukherjee Dipaloke Mukherjee, 2016, American Journal of Plant Sciences, V7, P479, DOI 10.4236/ajps.2016.73042
   Dubos C, 2010, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V15, P573, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.06.005
   Duforet-Frebourg N, 2014, MOL BIOL EVOL, V31, P2483, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msu182
   El-Monairy Olfat M, 2015, J Egypt Soc Parasitol, V45, P85
   Eze C, 2016, J EXP AGR INT, P1, DOI [10.9734/JEAI/2016/27053, DOI 10.9734/JEAI/2016/27053]
   Faye JM, 2019, ECOL EVOL, V9, P6038, DOI 10.1002/ece3.5187
   Foll M, 2008, GENETICS, V180, P977, DOI 10.1534/genetics.108.092221
   Forester BR, 2018, MOL ECOL, V27, P2215, DOI 10.1111/mec.14584
   Frichot E, 2015, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V6, P925, DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12382
   Frichot E, 2014, GENETICS, V196, P973, DOI 10.1534/genetics.113.160572
   Fufa T.W., 2021, J Plant Sci, V9, P224, DOI [DOI 10.11648/J.JPS.20210904.23, 10.11648/j.jps.20210904.23]
   Fufa T.W., 2021, IN PRESS, P8
   GUINARD JX, 1986, AM J ENOL VITICULT, V37, P184
   Gupta S, 2012, FUNCT INTEGR GENOMIC, V12, P543, DOI 10.1007/s10142-012-0277-0
   HALDANE J. B. S., 1957, JOUR GENETICS, V55, P511, DOI 10.1007/BF02984069
   He M, 2015, MOLECULES, V20, P1434, DOI 10.3390/molecules20011434
   Hijmans R. J., 2015, R PACKAGE
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   Kilian Andrzej, 2012, Methods Mol Biol, V888, P67, DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-870-2_5
   Kindt R, 2018, COMMUNITY ECOLOGY PA
   Kitsios G, 2011, PLANT SIGNAL BEHAV, V6, P204, DOI 10.4161/psb.6.2.14835
   Kokubugata Goro, 1999, Cytologia (Tokyo), V64, P77, DOI 10.1508/cytologia.64.77
   KURUVILLA KM, 1981, EUPHYTICA, V30, P405, DOI 10.1007/BF00034004
   Lasky JR, 2015, SCI ADV, V1, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1400218
   Leitch I., 2019, Plant DNA C-values database
   Li J, 2005, HEREDITY, V95, P221, DOI 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800717
   Mace ES, 2002, GENOME, V45, P823, DOI [10.1139/g02-045, 10.1139/G02-045]
   Magwanga RO, 2018, INT J MOL SCI, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijms19092625
   Markwei C., 2010, ASSESSMENT CULTIVAR, P29
   Matthews P.J., 2004, Ethnobot. Res. Appl, V2, P55, DOI DOI 10.17348/ERA.2.0.55-71
   Matthews PJ, 2021, PLANTS PEOPLE PLANET, V3, P99, DOI 10.1002/ppp3.10155
   Matthews PJ, 2010, An introduction to the history of taro as a food: Global Diversity of Taro
   Drucker A. G., 2016, Enhancing crop genepool use: capturing wild relative and landrace diversity for crop improvement, P362, DOI [10.1079/9781780646138.0000, 10.1079/9781780646138.0362]
   Menamo T, 2021, THEOR APPL GENET, V134, P731, DOI 10.1007/s00122-020-03727-5
   Miyasaka SC, 2019, SUSTAIN DEV BIODIVER, V22, P191, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-96454-6_7
   Nayik G.A., 2020, Antioxidants in vegetables and nuts-properties and health benefits, DOI [10.1007/978-981-15-7470-2, DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-7470-2]
   Nunney L, 2016, J HERED, V107, P15, DOI 10.1093/jhered/esv084
   OKADA H, 1989, CYTOLOGIA, V54, P389, DOI 10.1508/cytologia.54.389
   Olatoye MO, 2018, G3-GENES GENOM GENET, V8, P3269, DOI 10.1534/g3.118.200551
   Onyeka J, 2014, CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB), P1
   Popat R., 2020, Variability: Genetic Variability Analysis for Plant Breeding Research
   Power RA, 2017, NAT REV GENET, V18, P41, DOI 10.1038/nrg.2016.132
   Raats M. M., 1992, Food Quality and Preference, V3, P89, DOI 10.1016/0950-3293(91)90028-D
   Rao VR., 2010, ETHNOBOTANY GLOBAL D
   Rao VR., 2010, TARO GENETIC DIVERSI, P121
   Remington DL, 2001, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V98, P11479, DOI 10.1073/pnas.201394398
   Shanker AK, 2014, FUNCT INTEGR GENOMIC, V14, P11, DOI 10.1007/s10142-013-0356-x
   Singh D, 2012, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V2, P182, DOI 10.3390/agriculture2030182
   Sokolkova A, 2020, INT J MOL SCI, V21, DOI 10.3390/ijms21113952
   Storz JF, 2005, MOL ECOL, V14, P671, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02437.x
   Tamirisa S, 2017, FRONT PLANT SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.00165
   Ubalua Alfred O., 2016, Journal of Applied Biology & Biotechnology, V4, P53, DOI 10.7324/JABB.2016.40110
   Wang JB, 2021, GENOM PROTEOM BIOINF, V19, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.gpb.2021.08.005
   Westengen OT, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0047832
   Wilson JE., 1983, P 6 S INT SOC TROPIC
   Yang J, 2011, EUR J HUM GENET, V19, P807, DOI 10.1038/ejhg.2011.39
   ZHANG KM, 1994, MYCOLOGIA, V86, P108, DOI 10.2307/3760724
   Zhao Y, 2018, FRONT PLANT SCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.01426
   Zoratti L, 2015, AOB PLANTS, V7, DOI 10.1093/aobpla/plv117
NR 74
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 15
PU BMC
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND
SN 1471-2164
J9 BMC GENOMICS
JI BMC Genomics
PD JAN 24
PY 2023
VL 24
IS 1
AR 39
DI 10.1186/s12864-023-09134-6
PG 16
WC Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Genetics & Heredity
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Genetics & Heredity
GA 8G0UT
UT WOS:000920068000003
PM 36694124
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Mugandani, R
   Muziri, T
   Murewi, CTF
   Mugadza, A
   Chitata, T
   Sungirai, M
   Zirebwa, FS
   Manhondo, P
   Mupfiga, ET
   Nyamutowa, C
   Mudereri, BT
   Mugari, ZE
   Mwadzingeni, L
   Mafongoya, P
AF Mugandani, Raymond
   Muziri, Tavagwisa
   Murewi, Cyril Tapiwa Farai
   Mugadza, Amanda
   Chitata, Tavengwa
   Sungirai, Marvelous
   Zirebwa, Farai Solomon
   Manhondo, Petronella
   Mupfiga, Elvis Tawanda
   Nyamutowa, Charles
   Mudereri, Bester Tawona
   Mugari, Zvenyika Eckson
   Mwadzingeni, Liboster
   Mafongoya, Paramu
TI Mapping and Managing Livelihoods Vulnerability to Drought: A Case Study
   of Chivi District in Zimbabwe
SO CLIMATE
LA English
DT Article
DE drought hazard; livelihood vulnerability index (LVI); livelihood
   vulnerability index-intergovernmental panel on climate change
   (LVI-IPCC); Chivi district
ID EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; RISK; AGRICULTURE; ADAPTATION
AB The assessment of the vulnerability to drought hazards in smallholder farming systems dependent on rain-fed agriculture has recently gained global popularity, given the need to identify and prioritize climate hotspots for climate adaptation. Over the past decade, numerous studies have focused on vulnerability assessments with respect to drought and other meteorological hazards. Nonetheless, less research has focused on applying common measurement frameworks to compare vulnerability in different communities and the sources of such vulnerability. Yet, the crucial question remains: who is more vulnerable and what contributes to this vulnerability? This article is a case study for assessing the vulnerability to drought of smallholder farmers in two wards in Chivi district, Masvingo Province, Zimbabwe. This study is timely, as climate change is increasingly affecting populations dependent on rainfed agriculture. This assessment has been conducted by calculating the Livelihood Vulnerability Index (LVI) and Livelihood Vulnerability Index of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (LVI-IPCC). This empirical study used data from 258 households from the two wards and triangulated it through Key Informant Interviews and Focus Group Discussions. To calculate the LVI, twenty-six subcomponents made up of seven major components, including socio-demographic variables; livelihood strategies; social capital; access to food, health, and water; and exposure to drought, were considered. To calculate the LVI-IPCC, we combined the three contributing factors of vulnerability (exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity). Our results indicate that the LVI forward 14 is statistically higher than for ward 19 (F = 21.960; p <= 0.01) due to high exposure to drought, food insecurity, and compromised social networks. Concerning the LVI-IPCC, ward 14 was significantly more vulnerable to the impacts of drought than ward 19 (F = 7.718; p <= 0.01). Thus, reducing exposure to drought through early warning systems, building diversified agricultural systems, and social networks are of high priority to reduce the vulnerability of the farmers.
C1 [Mugandani, Raymond; Chitata, Tavengwa; Zirebwa, Farai Solomon; Mupfiga, Elvis Tawanda] Midlands State Univ, Fac Agr Environm & Nat Resources Management, Dept Land & Water Resources Management, Gweru 9055, Zimbabwe.
   [Muziri, Tavagwisa] Midlands State Univ, Fac Agr Environm & Nat Resources Management, Dept Agron & Hort, Gweru 9055, Zimbabwe.
   [Murewi, Cyril Tapiwa Farai] Midlands State Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Appl Math & Stat, Gweru 9055, Zimbabwe.
   [Mugadza, Amanda] Midlands State Univ, Fac Law, Publ Law Dept, Gweru 9055, Zimbabwe.
   [Chitata, Tavengwa] Univ Sheffield, Dept Geog, Sheffield S10 2TN, England.
   [Sungirai, Marvelous; Manhondo, Petronella; Mudereri, Bester Tawona] Midlands State Univ, Fac Agr Environm & Nat Resources Management, Dept Anim & Wildlife Sci, Gweru 9055, Zimbabwe.
   [Nyamutowa, Charles] Midlands State Univ, Fac Agr Environm & Nat Resources Management, Dept Agr Econ & Dev, Gweru 9055, Zimbabwe.
   [Mudereri, Bester Tawona] Int Ctr Insect Physiol & Ecol Icipe, POB 30772, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.
   [Mudereri, Bester Tawona] Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Anim Plant & Environm Sci, Private Bag 3, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa.
   [Mugari, Zvenyika Eckson] Midlands State Univ, Fac Social Sci, Gweru 9055, Zimbabwe.
   [Mwadzingeni, Liboster; Mafongoya, Paramu] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Agr Earth & Environm Sci, Carbis Rd, ZA-3201 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
C3 University of Sheffield; International Centre of Insect Physiology &
   Ecology (ICIPE); University of Witwatersrand; University of Kwazulu
   Natal
RP Mugandani, R (corresponding author), Midlands State Univ, Fac Agr Environm & Nat Resources Management, Dept Land & Water Resources Management, Gweru 9055, Zimbabwe.
EM mugandanir@staff.msu.ac.zw
RI Mudereri, Bester/O-3401-2019; Mugari, Zvenyika Eckson/GQQ-0270-2022;
   sungirai, marvelous/L-5594-2019; Mupfiga, Elvis/KZU-2352-2024;
   Mwadzingeni, Liboster/GNM-9468-2022; Mugandani, Raymond/GON-5779-2022;
   Murewi, Cyril/AAF-5982-2020
OI Murewi, Cyril T. F./0000-0002-0345-322X; Mugari, Zvenyika
   Eckson/0000-0002-8628-1370; Mupfiga, Elvis/0000-0003-2626-762X;
   Mugandani, Raymond/0000-0002-8280-4170; Mwadzingeni,
   Liboster/0000-0002-8015-7010
CR Abdul-Razak M, 2017, CLIM RISK MANAG, V17, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2017.06.001
   Abegunde VO, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12010195
   Adger WN, 2018, PHILOS T R SOC A, V376, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2018.0106
   Adu D. T., 2018, Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, V39, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.kjss.2017.06.009
   Aitsi-Selmi A, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V6, P164, DOI 10.1007/s13753-015-0050-9
   Alderman H, 2006, OXFORD ECON PAP, V58, P450, DOI 10.1093/oep/gpl008
   Amuzu J., 2018, J. Environ. Earth Sci, V8, P35, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.2.36057.42081, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.36057.42081]
   [Anonymous], GCF GREEN CLIMATE FU
   [Anonymous], 2020, GOZ NATL DEV STRATEG
   [Anonymous], 2007, HUMAN DEV REPORTS
   Ashburner L., 2018, P 5 INT CLIMATE CHAN
   Barros VR, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1133
   Bhattacharjee K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P758, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.017
   Birkmann J, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V803, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150065
   Botero D.Gonzalez, 2013, ASSESSING FARMERS VU
   Brown D., 2012, Climate change impacts, vulnerability and adaptation in Zimbabwe
   Chingarande D., 2020, ZIMBABWE STAKEHOLDER
   de Sherbinin A, 2019, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V10, DOI 10.1002/wcc.600
   Diana MIN, 2019, IOP CONF SER-MAT SCI, V506, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/506/1/012059
   Donatti CI, 2019, CLIM DEV, V11, P264, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2018.1442796
   Doshi D, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12104308
   Fellmann T., 2012, Building resilience for adaptation to climate change in the agriculture sector. Proceedings of a Joint FAO/OECD Workshop, Rome, Italy, 23-24 April 2012, P37
   Frischen J, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12030752
   Gaiha R., 2008, Measuring vulnerability and poverty estimates for rural India
   Githui N.P., 2021, VULNERABILITY SMALLH
   GOZ (Government of Zimbabwe), 2021, ZIMB REV NAT DET CON
   Gulev S. K., 2021, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781009157896.004, 10.1017/9781009157896, 10.1017/9781009157896.004]
   Hachigonta S., 2013, Southern African agriculture and climate change: a comprehensive analysis, V3
   Hagenlocher M, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab225d
   Hahn MB, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.11.002
   Hirabayashi Y, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P816, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1911, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1911]
   IPCC, 2022, IPCC sixth assessment report-climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change
   IPCC, 2007, 4 ASSESSMENT REPORT, P433
   Jayne TS, 2010, WORLD DEV, V38, P1384, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.06.002
   Kovats RS, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1267
   Lahsen M, 2022, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V13, DOI 10.1002/wcc.750
   Lee M, 2022, J RURAL STUD, V92, P214, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.03.031
   Lemessa SD, 2019, COGENT FOOD AGR, V5, DOI 10.1080/23311932.2019.1640835
   Lunduka RW, 2019, CLIM DEV, V11, P35, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1372269
   Malone EL, 2011, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V2, P462, DOI 10.1002/wcc.116
   Manatsa D., 2020, REPORT REVISED AGROE
   Mascndeke S., 2014, International Journal of Social Science Studies, V2, P137, DOI [10.11114/ijsss.v2i.1.299, DOI 10.11114/IJSSS.V2I.1.299, DOI 10.11114/IJSSS.V2I1.299]
   McCarthy JJ, 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P1
   Meza I, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P695, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-695-2020
   Mudasser M., 2020, INVESTIGATING CLIMAT, V1, P12, DOI [10.3390/world1020012, DOI 10.3390/WORLD1020012]
   Ncube M, 2016, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V8, DOI 10.4102/jamba.v8i2.182
   Nguyen MH, 2021, J ASIAN AFR STUD, V56, P1879, DOI 10.1177/0021909621993499
   Huong NTL, 2019, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V25, P1157, DOI 10.1080/10807039.2018.1460801
   Nhodo L., 2013, Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, V4, P19
   Nyikahadzoi K, 2011, DROUGHT HAZARD RISK
   Poudel S, 2020, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V22, P8159, DOI 10.1007/s10668-019-00566-3
   Rai P, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14042339
   Ramirez-Villegas J, 2021, CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Working Paper
   Ribot J, 2013, HANDBOOK ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND HUMAN SECURITY, P164
   Ribot J, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P1160, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.07.008
   Sarker MNI, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11061623
   Sekhri S, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106700
   Sharma J, 2019, ENVIRON RES COMMUN, V1, DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/ab24ed
   Simane B, 2016, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V21, P39, DOI 10.1007/s11027-014-9568-1
   Stânga IC, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P1987, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-1987-2012
   Theodory TF, 2021, AFR J SCI TECHNOL IN, V13, P51, DOI 10.1080/20421338.2020.1816615
   Thomas K, 2019, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V10, DOI 10.1002/wcc.565
   Thwaites J., 2019, MULTILATERAL DEV BAN
   Tilman D, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P20260, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1116437108
   Timilsina GR, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13126515
   UNDP, 2015, MAPP SEL HAZ AFF RUR
   UNFCCC, 2015, PAR AGR
   Tran VT, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13137106
   Yang X, 2021, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/agriculture11111088
   Zimbabwe, 2019, National Adaptation Plan Roadmap
   ZimStat, 2013, ZIMB POP CENS 2012, V1, P110
   ZIMSTAT, 2018, Poverty, Income, Consumption and Expenditure Survey 2017 Report
NR 72
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 2
U2 9
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2225-1154
J9 CLIMATE
JI Climate
PD DEC
PY 2022
VL 10
IS 12
AR 189
DI 10.3390/cli10120189
PG 16
WC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA 7D6XI
UT WOS:000900630200001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Oyinlola, MA
   Reygondeau, G
   Wabnitz, CCC
   Frölicher, TL
   Lam, VWY
   Cheung, WWL
AF Oyinlola, Muhammed A.
   Reygondeau, Gabriel
   Wabnitz, Colette C. C.
   Frolicher, Thomas L.
   Lam, Vicky W. Y.
   Cheung, William W. L.
TI Projecting global mariculture production and adaptation pathways under
   climate change
SO GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE fish farming; fishmeal replacement; food security; food system; forage
   fish aquafeed; global change; resilience
ID FISH-MEAL REPLACEMENT; PLANT PROTEIN-SOURCES; SALMON SALMO-SALAR;
   FEEDING 9 BILLION; ATLANTIC SALMON; OIL REPLACEMENT; FOOD SECURITY;
   AQUACULTURE; AQUAFEEDS; TRENDS
AB The sustainability of global seafood supply to meet increasing demand is facing several challenges, including increasing consumption levels due to a growing human population, fisheries resources over-exploitation and climate change. Whilst growth in seafood production from capture fisheries is limited, global mariculture production is expanding. However, climate change poses risks to the potential seafood production from mariculture. Here, we apply a global mariculture production model that accounts for changing ocean conditions, suitable marine area for farming, fishmeal and fish oil production, farmed species dietary demand, farmed fish price and global seafood demand to project mariculture production under two climate and socio-economic scenarios. We include 85 farmed marine fish and mollusc species, representing about 70% of all mariculture production in 2015. Results show positive global mariculture production changes by the mid and end of the 21(st) century relative to the 2000s under the SSP1-2.6 scenario with an increase of 17%+/- 5 and 33%+/- 6, respectively. However, under the SSP5-8.5 scenario, an increase of 8%+/- 5 is projected, with production peaking by mid-century and declining by 16%+/- 5 towards the end of the 21(st) century. More than 25% of mariculture-producing nations are projected to lose 40%-90% of their current mariculture production potential under SSP5-8.5 by mid-century. Projected impacts are mainly due to the direct ocean warming effects on farmed species and suitable marine areas, and the indirect impacts of changing availability of forage fishes supplies to produce aquafeed. Fishmeal replacement with alternative protein can lower climate impacts on a subset of finfish production. However, such adaptation measures do not apply to regions dominated by non-feed-based farming (i.e. molluscs) and regions losing substantial marine areas suitable for mariculture. Our study highlights the importance of strong mitigation efforts and the need for different climate adaptation options tailored to the diversity of mariculture systems, to support climate-resilient mariculture development.
C1 [Oyinlola, Muhammed A.; Reygondeau, Gabriel; Wabnitz, Colette C. C.; Lam, Vicky W. Y.; Cheung, William W. L.] Univ British Columbia, Inst Oceans & Fisheries, Changing Ocean Res Unit, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
   [Wabnitz, Colette C. C.] Stanford Ctr Ocean Solut, Stanford, CA USA.
   [Frolicher, Thomas L.] Univ Bern, Phys Inst, Climate & Environm Phys, Bern, Switzerland.
   [Frolicher, Thomas L.] Univ Bern, Oeschger Ctr Climate Change Res, Bern, Switzerland.
C3 University of British Columbia; University of Bern; University of Bern
RP Oyinlola, MA (corresponding author), Univ British Columbia, Inst Oceans & Fisheries, Changing Ocean Res Unit, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
EM m.oyinlola@oceans.ubc.ca
RI Lam, Vy/KBQ-7534-2024; Reygondeau, Gabriel/G-1903-2017; Cheung,
   William/F-5104-2013; /CAE-6559-2022; Oyinlola, Muhammed
   Alolade/B-4363-2019; Frolicher, Thomas/E-5137-2015
OI Oyinlola, Muhammed Alolade/0000-0001-5177-854X; Frolicher,
   Thomas/0000-0003-2348-7854; Lam, Vicky/0000-0002-1931-0514; Cheung,
   William/0000-0001-9998-0384
FU Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Nippon
   Foundation--the University of British Columbia Nereus Program
FX Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; the Nippon
   Foundation--the University of British Columbia Nereus Program
CR Albert J., 2018, Package LearnBayes
   Alder J, 2008, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V33, P153, DOI 10.1146/annurev.environ.33.020807.143204
   Andreyeva T, 2010, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V100, P216, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2008.151415
   [Anonymous], 2015, Feed and Feeding Practices in Aquaculture, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-100506-4.00008-8
   Bandara T., 2018, J. Entomol. Zool. Stud., V6, P3087
   Barange M, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P211, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2119, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2119]
   Beal CM, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-33504-w
   Bene C, 2015, FOOD SECUR, V7, P261, DOI 10.1007/s12571-015-0427-z
   Boucher O, 2020, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V12, DOI 10.1029/2019MS002010
   Boyd C.E., 2015, Feed and Feeding Practices in Aquaculture, P3, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-100506-4.00001-5
   Breitburg D, 2018, SCIENCE, V359, P46, DOI 10.1126/science.aam7240
   Bryndum-Buchholz A, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P459, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14512
   Campbell B, 2013, MAR POLICY, V39, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.10.009
   Carter CG, 2000, AQUACULTURE, V185, P299, DOI 10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00353-1
   Cashion T, 2017, FISH FISH, V18, P837, DOI 10.1111/faf.12209
   Checkley DM, 2009, CLIMATE CHANGE AND SMALL PELAGIC FISH, P1
   Cheung WWL, 2021, SCI ADV, V7, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abh0895
   Cheung WWL, 2017, FISH FISH, V18, P254, DOI 10.1111/faf.12177
   Cheung WWL, 2016, ECOL MODEL, V325, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.12.018
   Cheung WWL, 2010, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V16, P24, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01995.x
   Cochrane KL., 2009, FAO FISHERIES AQUACU
   Costello C, 2020, NATURE, V588, P95, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2616-y
   Cottrell RS, 2020, NAT FOOD, V1, DOI 10.1038/s43016-020-0078-x
   Daniel N., 2018, International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies, V6, P164, DOI DOI 10.1038/S41598-020-60325-7
   Davies IP, 2019, MAR POLICY, V104, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.02.054
   Delgado C. L., 2003, Fish to 2020: supply and demand in changing global markets
   Dunne JP, 2020, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V12, DOI 10.1029/2019MS002015
   Easterling W, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P273
   Edwards P., 2000, Aquaculture, poverty impacts and livelihoods, Natural Resources Perspectives
   Eyring V, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P1937, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
   FAO, 2022, The state of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. Towards Blue Transformation, DOI [10.4060/ca9229en, 10.4060/cc0461en, DOI 10.4060/CC0461EN, DOI 10.4060/CA9229EN]
   FAO, 2003, FAO FISH CIRC, V886, P95
   FAO, 2017, The impact of disasters and crises on agriculture and food security: 2021, DOI DOI 10.4060/CB3673-N
   FAO, 2018, STATE WORLD FISHERIE
   Fearnside PM, 2001, ENVIRON CONSERV, V28, P23, DOI 10.1017/S0376892901000030
   Fischer G., 2002, CLIMATE CHANGE AGR V
   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2019, FISHSTATJ SOFTW FISH
   Froehlich HE, 2018, NAT ECOL EVOL, V2, P1745, DOI 10.1038/s41559-018-0669-1
   Froehlich HE, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P298, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0077-1
   Galappaththi EK, 2020, REV AQUACULT, V12, P2160, DOI 10.1111/raq.12427
   Garcia SM, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P2869, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0171
   Gatlin DM, 2007, AQUAC RES, V38, P551, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01704.x
   Gentry RR, 2017, NAT ECOL EVOL, V1, P1317, DOI 10.1038/s41559-017-0257-9
   Gephart JA, 2020, REV FISH SCI AQUAC, V29, P122, DOI 10.1080/23308249.2020.1782342
   Glencross BD, 2020, REV AQUACULT, V12, P703, DOI 10.1111/raq.12347
   Gobler CJ, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P4975, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1619575114
   Godfray HCJ, 2010, SCIENCE, V327, P812, DOI 10.1126/science.1185383
   Gómez-Requeni P, 2004, AQUACULTURE, V232, P493, DOI 10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00532-5
   Gutierrez AP, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0119730
   Gutjahr O, 2019, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V12, P3241, DOI 10.5194/gmd-12-3241-2019
   Hardy, 1980, FISH FEED TECHNOLOGY, P233
   Hardy RW, 2010, AQUAC RES, V41, P770, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02349.x
   Henriksson PJG, 2021, ONE EARTH, V4, P1220, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.08.009
   Gasparri NI, 2016, CONSERV LETT, V9, P21, DOI 10.1111/conl.12173
   Izquierdo MS, 2015, AQUACULTURE, V449, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.03.032
   Jacobsen NS, 2018, FISH FISH, V19, P791, DOI 10.1111/faf.12290
   Jones MC, 2015, ICES J MAR SCI, V72, P741, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsu172
   Kourentzes N, 2014, EXPERT SYST APPL, V41, P4235, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.12.011
   Lam VWY, 2020, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V1, P440, DOI 10.1038/s43017-020-0071-9
   Lazzarotto V, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0190730
   Leung TLF, 2013, J APPL ECOL, V50, P215, DOI 10.1111/1365-2644.12017
   Lhorente JP, 2019, REV AQUACULT, V11, P340, DOI 10.1111/raq.12335
   Li X, 2011, AGR SYST, V104, P348, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.12.006
   Liu OR, 2018, PEERJ, V6, DOI 10.7717/peerj.4733
   Molinos JG, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P83, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2769
   Naylor RL, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-25516-4
   Naylor RL, 2021, NATURE, V591, P551, DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-03308-6
   O'Neill BC, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004
   O'Neill BC, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P3461, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016
   Odegård J, 2011, AQUAC RES, V42, P103, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02669.x
   da Silva RDO, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-90600-0
   Oyinlola, 2019, FISHERIES CTR RES RE, V27, P125, DOI [10.14288/1.0387414, DOI 10.14288/1.0387414]
   Oyinlola, 2019, THESIS U BRIT COLUMB
   Oyinlola MA, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P2134, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14974
   Oyinlola MA, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0191086
   Pahlow M, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V536, P847, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.124
   Patil V, 2007, AQUACULT INT, V15, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10499-006-9060-3
   Pauly D, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms10244
   Pearson RG, 2003, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V12, P361, DOI 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00042.x
   Phillips SJ, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V190, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
   Pikitch EK, 2014, FISH FISH, V15, P43, DOI 10.1111/faf.12004
   Pillay, 1980, FISH FEED TECHNOLOGY, P242
   Ramirez-Cabral NYZ, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-05804-0
   Reid GK, 2019, AQUACULT ENV INTERAC, V11, P603, DOI 10.3354/aei00333
   Roderburg J, 2011, Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal, V25, P161
   Rossi W, 2012, AQUACULTURE, V338, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.01.026
   Ruiz N., 2020, A review: 100 years of soybean meal
   RUMSEY GL, 1994, VET IMMUNOL IMMUNOP, V41, P323, DOI 10.1016/0165-2427(94)90105-8
   Rye M, 2010, P 9 WORLD C GEN APPL
   Sae-Lim P, 2017, J ANIM SCI, V95, P1801, DOI 10.2527/jas.2016.1066
   Salayo ND, 2012, MAR POLICY, V36, P867, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.12.003
   Salvatteci R, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P1055, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13991
   Santigosa E, 2011, AQUACULTURE, V317, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.04.026
   Sarker PK, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0201315
   Scopel L, 2019, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V626, P177, DOI 10.3354/meps13048
   Shah MR, 2018, J APPL PHYCOL, V30, P197, DOI 10.1007/s10811-017-1234-z
   Shannon L, 2021, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2021.645023
   Shepherd CJ, 2013, J FISH BIOL, V83, P1046, DOI 10.1111/jfb.12224
   Sonesson AK, 2009, GENET SEL EVOL, V41, DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-41-37
   Soutullo A, 2020, ENVIRON CONSERV, V47, P97, DOI 10.1017/S0376892920000089
   SoybeanMealInfoCenter, 2018, WORLD FEED PROD
   Sprague M, 2017, BIOTECHNOL LETT, V39, P1599, DOI 10.1007/s10529-017-2402-6
   TACON AGJ, 2011, FAO FISHERIES AQUACU
   Tacon AGJ, 2008, AQUACULTURE, V285, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.08.015
   Thilsted S H., 2014, Maximizing the contribution of fish to human nutrition
   Tigchelaar M, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P6644, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1718031115
   Torrecillas S, 2017, AQUACULTURE, V468, P386, DOI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.11.005
   Torstensen BE, 2011, BRIT J NUTR, V106, P633, DOI 10.1017/S0007114511000729
   Tourre YM, 2007, ENVIRON RES LETT, V2, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/2/3/034005
   Troell M, 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/109001
   Tschirner M, 2017, GAIA, V26, P332, DOI 10.14512/gaia.26.4.10
   Turchini G.M., 2010, Fish Oil Replacement and Alternative Lipid Sources in Aquaculture Feeds
   Turchini GM, 2009, REV AQUACULT, V1, P10, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-5131.2008.01001.x
   van den Burg SWK, 2017, MAR POLICY, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.007
   van Vuuren DP, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P148, DOI [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.009, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009]
   Vianna GMS, 2020, CURR ENV HLTH REP, V7, P161, DOI 10.1007/s40572-020-00286-1
   Wood S.N., 2017, Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R, V2nd edn.
   Ytrestoyl T, 2015, AQUACULTURE, V448, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.06.023
NR 118
TC 20
Z9 21
U1 5
U2 54
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1354-1013
EI 1365-2486
J9 GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL
JI Glob. Change Biol.
PD FEB
PY 2022
VL 28
IS 4
BP 1315
EP 1331
DI 10.1111/gcb.15991
EA DEC 2021
PG 17
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA YH0MZ
UT WOS:000729541600001
PM 34902203
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wan, SH
   Radhakrishnan, M
   Zevenbergen, C
   Pathirana, A
AF Wan, Shanhong
   Radhakrishnan, Mohanasundar
   Zevenbergen, Chris
   Pathirana, Assela
TI Capturing the changing dynamics between governmental actions across
   plausible future scenarios in urban water systems
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Connections; DPSIR; Governmental actions; Scenarios; SWOT; Urban water
   systems; Water quality
ID CLIMATE ADAPTATION; DECISION-MAKING; DPSIR FRAMEWORK; SWOT-ANALYSIS;
   CHALLENGES
AB Deterioration of water quality due to economic development, climate change and other factors has become a challenge to human beings and the ecosystem. Most countries have recognized this problem and have resorted to actions for improving water quality. However, the effect on water quality improvements due to these actions is uncertain due to the plausibility of multiple scenarios like climate change scenarios and socio- economic scenarios. Hence it is important to assess how these actions implemented by various governmental agencies relate or connect to each other towards sustaining the water quality targets in the future. The paper discusses the need for a systematic approach based on SWOT analysis and DPSIR framework to establish and assess the connections between governmental actions that will ensure achieving water quality objectives at present and in the future scenarios. The proposed methodology to quantify the connection relies on impact based indicators for quantifying connections between governmental actions. The methodology was tested using the governmental actions usually implemented to improve water quality in Luzhi Town, a water village in China, in the context of four plausible scenarios based on change in land use and economic development. The results show that the connections between physical actions as well as policy actions change across future scenarios due to the change in drivers resulting in diverse impacts based on the scenario. For example, the difference in impact on water quality due to wetlands project is profound between the high green area scenarios and low green area scenarios irrespective of economic drivers, whereas the difference in impact due to the sanitation project is mild in all four scenarios. It can be concluded that by combining SWOT analysis and DPSIR framework, the connections between governmental actions can be established; and, scenario-based impact assessment methods can be used to select, implement and sustain governmental actions for resolving the challenges related to water quality deterioration in the future.
C1 [Wan, Shanhong; Radhakrishnan, Mohanasundar; Zevenbergen, Chris; Pathirana, Assela] IHE Delft Inst Water Educ, Delft, Netherlands.
C3 IHE Delft Institute for Water Education
RP Radhakrishnan, M (corresponding author), IHE Delft Inst Water Educ, Delft, Netherlands.
EM mohanasundar@gmail.com
RI Pathirana, Assela/B-5189-2011
OI Radhakrishnan, Mohanasundar/0000-0003-3785-7713
CR [Anonymous], 2015, 13065 ISO
   [Anonymous], 2019, SPEC ED PROGR SUST D
   Bilalic M, 2008, COGNITION, V108, P652, DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.005
   Botequilha-Leitao A, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102089
   Chu E, 2017, CITIES, V60, P378, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.016
   Davidson KM, 2011, LOCAL ENVIRON, V16, P213, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2011.565464
   Emenike CP, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V30, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.01.005
   Fang HH, 2016, DESTECH TRANS SOC, P8
   Griffiths J, 2020, PHILOS T R SOC A, V378, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2019.0222
   Griggs D. J., 2017, GUIDE SDG INTER CONN
   Haase D, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V80, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.03.011
   Nguyen HQ, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101465
   Houben G, 1999, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V26, P125, DOI 10.1016/S0167-9236(99)00024-X
   Islam FR, 2017, GREEN ENERGY TECHNOL, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-50197-0_1
   Jackson SE, 2003, J MANAGE, V29, P801, DOI 10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00080-1
   Jiang LW, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.008
   Kaur M, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V259, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120897
   Lewison RL, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V56, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.001
   LINSTER Myriam., 2003, OECD ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS: DEVELOPMENT
   Liu H, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11081606
   Mack L, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V668, P470, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.251
   Molina-Navarro E, 2020, LIMNOLOGICA, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.limno.2019.125742
   Motew M, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V693, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.290
   O'Neill BC, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004
   O'Neill BC, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P387, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2
   RADHAKRISHNAN M, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI DOI 10.3390/W9120939
   Radhakrishnan M, 2018, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V102, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.12.016
   Radhakrishnan M, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9020129
   SAATY TL, 1977, J MATH PSYCHOL, V15, P234, DOI 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
   Sadoff CW, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P346, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-0530-9
   Samir KC, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.004
   Sayers P, 2015, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V13, P137, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2014.902378
   The Housing and Urban-rural Development Department of Luzhi Town, 2019, INF BIDD PROJ RUR SE
   The Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China, 2019, STAT SURF WAT AIR QU
   The People's Government of Luzhi Town, 2019, REP GOV WORK 2019
   The Planning Department of Suzhou, 2017, REG PLAN LUZH VILL S
   The State Council of China, 2015, NOT STAT COUNC PRINT
   The State Council of China, 2014, NAT NEW URB PLAN 201
   The State Council of China, 2015, GUID OP GEN OFF STAT
   The Tourism Department of Suzhou, 2013, SUZH TOUR ANN REP
   Tscherning K, 2012, LAND USE POLICY, V29, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.05.009
   Velmurugan R, 2011, PHARMAZIE, V66, P836, DOI 10.1691/ph.2011.1034
   Von Bertalanffy L., 1968, General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications
   [袁再健 Yuan Zaijian], 2017, [生态环境学报, Ecology and Environmental Sciences], V26, P896
NR 44
TC 7
Z9 8
U1 2
U2 26
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD NOV
PY 2020
VL 62
AR 102318
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102318
PG 9
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA NU4DI
UT WOS:000573592300003
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Jennings, M
   Haeuser, E
   Foote, D
   Lewison, R
   Conlisk, E
AF Jennings, Megan
   Haeuser, Emily
   Foote, Diane
   Lewison, Rebecca
   Conlisk, Erin
TI Planning for Dynamic Connectivity: Operationalizing Robust
   Decision-Making and Prioritization Across Landscapes Experiencing
   Climate and Land-Use Change
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; climate-wise connectivity; conservation; ecological
   network; feasibility; functional connectivity; linkage; multispecies;
   protected area network; scenario
ID CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; SUITABILITY; CALIFORNIA; RESISTANCE; FACETS;
   MODELS
AB Preserving landscape connectivity is one of the most frequently recommended strategies to address the synergistic threats of climate change, habitat fragmentation, and intensifying disturbances. Although assessments to develop plans for linked and connected landscapes in response to climate and land-use change have been increasingly employed in the last decade, efforts to operationalize and implement these plans have been limited. Here, we present a framework using existing, available biological data to design an implementable, comprehensive multispecies connectivity plan. This framework uses a scenario-based approach to consider how ecosystems, habitats, and species may need to adapt to future conditions with an ensemble of connectivity models. We use the south coast ecoregion of California as an example to evaluate and prioritize linkages by combining linked metapopulation models and key landscape features (e.g., conservation planning status and implementation feasibility) to identify and prioritize a multispecies linkage network. Our analyses identified approximately 30,000 km(2) of land, roughly one-fifth of our study area, where actions to preserve or enhance connectivity may support climate adaptation, nearly half of which is already conserved. By developing and implementing a dynamic connectivity assessment with an eye towards projected changes, our analysis demonstrates how dynamic connectivity can be integrated into feasible regional conservation and management plans that account for demographic as well as landscape change. We observed overlap across multiple models, reinforcing the importance of areas that appeared across methods. We also identified unique areas important for connectivity captured by our complementary models. By integrating multiple approaches, the resultant linkage network is robust, building on the strengths of a variety of methods to identify model consensus and reduce uncertainty. By linking quantitative connectivity metrics with prioritized areas for conservation, our approach supports transparent and robust decision-making for landscape planning, despite uncertainties of climate and land-use change.
C1 [Jennings, Megan; Foote, Diane; Lewison, Rebecca] San Diego State Univ, Biol Dept, 5500 Campanile Dr, San Diego, CA 92182 USA.
   [Jennings, Megan; Foote, Diane; Lewison, Rebecca] San Diego State Univ, Inst Ecol Monitoring & Management, San Diego, CA 92182 USA.
   [Haeuser, Emily] Univ Washington, Inst Hlth Metr & Evaluat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.
   [Conlisk, Erin] Point Blue Conservat Sci, Petaluma, CA 94954 USA.
C3 California State University System; San Diego State University;
   California State University System; San Diego State University;
   Institute for Health Metrics & Evaluation; University of Washington;
   University of Washington Seattle
RP Jennings, M (corresponding author), San Diego State Univ, Biol Dept, 5500 Campanile Dr, San Diego, CA 92182 USA.; Jennings, M (corresponding author), San Diego State Univ, Inst Ecol Monitoring & Management, San Diego, CA 92182 USA.
EM mjennings@sdsu.edu; ehaeuser@uw.edu; dfoote@sdsu.edu; rlewison@sdsu.edu;
   econlisk@pointblue.org
OI Jennings, Megan/0000-0002-3707-851X; Lewison, Rebecca
   L./0000-0003-3065-2926
FU California Wildlife Conservation Board [WC-1541SM, 2015095]; California
   State Wildlife Grant [F16AF00551, G1698064]
FX This research was funded by the California Wildlife Conservation Board
   grant number WC-1541SM, Project ID#2015095 and a California State
   Wildlife Grant F16AF00551; Project #G1698064.
CR Adriaensen F, 2003, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V64, P233, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00242-6
   Akcakaya H.R., 2005, LINKING LANDSCAPE DA
   Albert CH, 2017, CONSERV BIOL, V31, P1383, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12943
   Anantharaman R., 2019, ARXIV2019190603542
   [Anonymous], 2017, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
   [Anonymous], 2006, CORRIDOR ECOLOGY SCI
   [Anonymous], 2018, GREENINFO NETWORK CA
   [Anonymous], 2018, GREENINFO NETWORK CA
   [Anonymous], 2009, National Elevation Dataset
   Beier P, 2012, PLOS BIOL, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001253
   Beier P, 2010, CONSERV BIOL, V24, P701, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01422.x
   Bengtsson J, 2003, AMBIO, V32, P389, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2003)032[0389:RRADL]2.0.CO;2
   Bezanson J, 2017, SIAM REV, V59, P65, DOI 10.1137/141000671
   Brost BM, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048965
   Brost BM, 2012, ECOL APPL, V22, P87, DOI 10.1890/11-0213.1
   BROWN JH, 1977, ECOLOGY, V58, P445, DOI 10.2307/1935620
   Comer PJ, 2015, CONSERV BIOL, V29, P692, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12508
   Csardi G., 2006, The igraph software package for complex network research
   Daly C, 2006, INT J CLIMATOL, V26, P707, DOI 10.1002/joc.1322
   Dilkina B, 2017, CONSERV BIOL, V31, P192, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12814
   Elissa Lynn, 2015, PERSPECTIVES GUIDANC
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Flint L.E., 2012, ECOL PROCESS, V1, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1186/2192-1709-1-2, 10.1186/2192-1709-1-2]
   Flint L.E., 2013, ECOL PROCESS, V2, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1186/2192-1709-2-25, 10.1186/2192-1709-2-25]
   Franklin J, 2009, DIVERS DISTRIB, V15, P167, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00536.x
   Gallo J.A., 2018, Connectivity Analysis Software for Estimating Linkage Priority
   Gippoliti S, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V68, P686, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.001
   Hannah L, 2002, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V11, P485, DOI 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00306.x
   Hanski I., 1999, Metapopulation ecology, P313
   Heller NE, 2009, BIOL CONSERV, V142, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.006
   Hijmans RJ, 2017, CIRCLES, V9, P1
   Jenness J., DEM SURFACE TOOLS
   Jenness J., 2013, LAND FACET CORRIDOR, P110
   Jin SM, 2013, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V132, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2013.01.012
   Keeley ATH, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab3234
   Keeley ATH, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aacb85
   Keeley ATH, 2016, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V31, P2151, DOI 10.1007/s10980-016-0387-5
   Krosby M, 2015, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V30, P2121, DOI 10.1007/s10980-015-0235-z
   Luque S, 2012, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V27, P153, DOI 10.1007/s10980-011-9700-5
   Mateo-Sánchez MC, 2015, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V30, P1405, DOI 10.1007/s10980-015-0194-4
   McGuire JL, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P7195, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1602817113
   McRae BH., 2011, LINKAGE MAPPER CONNE
   Mcrae BH, 2008, ECOLOGY, V89, P2712, DOI 10.1890/07-1861.1
   McRae BH, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0052604
   NOSS RF, 1991, LANDSCAPE LINKAGES AND BIODIVERSITY, P27
   Nuñez TA, 2013, CONSERV BIOL, V27, P407, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12014
   Parmesan C, 2006, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V37, P637, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
   Penrod K., 2012, A Linkage Network for the California Deserts. Produced for the Bureau of Land Management and The Wildlands Conservancy. Produced by Science and Collaboration for Connected Wildlands, Fair Oaks
   Peterson GD, 2003, CONSERV BIOL, V17, P358, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01491.x
   Pierce DW, 2014, J HYDROMETEOROL, V15, P2558, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0082.1
   Saura S, 2018, BIOL CONSERV, V219, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.020
   Sheehan T, 2016, ECOL INFORM, V34, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2016.05.001
   Shirk A., 2013, Gnarly landscape utilities: core mapper user guide
   SIMBERLOFF D, 1992, CONSERV BIOL, V6, P493, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06040493.x
   South Coast Wildlands, 2008, S COAST WILDLANDS S
   Spencer W.D., 2010, CALIFORNIA ESSENTIAL, P313
   Syphard AD, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P1388, DOI 10.1890/06-1128.1
   Theobald DM, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0143619
   Trainor AM, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P755, DOI 10.1007/s10980-013-9861-5
   Underwood EC, 2009, DIVERS DISTRIB, V15, P188, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00518.x
   Vos CC, 2010, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V25, P1465, DOI 10.1007/s10980-010-9535-5
   Wood SN, 2011, J ROY STAT SOC B, V73, P3, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x
   Zimmerman JKH, 2018, FRESHWATER BIOL, V63, P859, DOI 10.1111/fwb.13058
NR 63
TC 12
Z9 13
U1 0
U2 23
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD OCT
PY 2020
VL 9
IS 10
AR 341
DI 10.3390/land9100341
PG 18
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA OM9AJ
UT WOS:000586307600001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Rajan, LJ
   Santhoshkumar, AV
   Gopal, KS
   Kunhamu, TK
AF Rajan, Lakshmy J.
   Santhoshkumar, A., V
   Gopal, Surendra K.
   Kunhamu, T. K.
TI Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculation as a Climate Adaptation
   Strategy for Establishment of<i>Swietenia macrophylla</i>King. Seedlings
SO FORESTS
LA English
DT Article
DE drought stress; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; Swietenia macrophylla;
   rate of photosynthesis; stomatal conductance; transpiration rate; leaf
   temperature; chlorophyll content; plant water status
ID NUTRIENT-UPTAKE; DROUGHT STRESS; GAS-EXCHANGE; WATER STATUS; STOMATAL
   CONDUCTANCE; OSMOTIC ADJUSTMENT; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; GROWTH; PLANTS;
   PHOTOSYNTHESIS
AB Research Highlights:Drought stress significantly decreased the performance of seedlings in the nursery. Seedlings inoculated withClaroideoglomus etunicatumis recommended to produce superior planting stock of mahogany seedlings with better drought resistance in the nursery.Background and Objectives:With numerous intense droughts across tropical regions due to climate change, it is crucial to understand effects of drought stress on tree seedlings to improve crop management practices and avoid failures on large scale planting.Swietenia macrophylla, a commercial timber species in India, is poorly studied in relation to its management including physiological responses to various environmental stresses. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is known to improve performance of tree seedlings under drought conditions and produce quality planting stock in nursery. This study aims to understand the responses of mahogany seedlings under different levels of drought stress when inoculated with three types of AMF, namelyFunneliformis mosseae,Claroideoglomus etunicatum,andRhizophagus intraradices.Materials and Methods:The experiment is conducted in pot culture using a factorial completely randomized design. Different irrigation regimes were applied at 100, 80, 60, and 40 percentage of weekly cumulative evapotranspiration. The seedlings were tested for biometric, physiological, and mycorrhizal parameters periodically.Results:Physiological attributes such as rate of photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, chlorophyll content, and water potential were found to be higher in the daily irrigated (control) seedlings. Performance of the seedlings were poorest in the least irrigated treatment. It was apparent that inoculated seedlings performed better than the non-inoculated ones.Conclusions:Among the three different AMF species used,C. etunicatumwas found to be the most beneficial and suitable for the young mahogany seedlings. These seedlings also recorded higher root colonization percentage and total spore count in the rhizosphere soils. Seedlings inoculated withC. etunicatumshowed positive influence on rate of photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, chlorophyll content, relative growth rate (RGR) and water potential of seedlings.
C1 [Rajan, Lakshmy J.] Tech Univ Dresden, Inst Trop Forestry & Forest Prod, D-01737 Dresden, Germany.
   [Santhoshkumar, A., V] Kerala Agr Univ, Coll Forestry, Dept Forest Biol & Tree Improvement, Trichur 680656, India.
   [Gopal, Surendra K.] Kerala Agr Univ, Coll Hort, Dept Agr Microbiol, Trichur 680656, India.
   [Kunhamu, T. K.] Kerala Agr Univ, Coll Forestry, Dept Silviculture & Agroforestry, Trichur 680656, India.
C3 Technische Universitat Dresden
RP Rajan, LJ (corresponding author), Tech Univ Dresden, Inst Trop Forestry & Forest Prod, D-01737 Dresden, Germany.
EM lakshmy.jalaja_rajan@mailbox.tu-dresden.de; santhoshkumar.av@kau.in;
   gopsurendra@gmail.com; kunhamu.tk@kau.in
RI AV, Santhoshkumar/ADP-1870-2022
OI AV, Santhoshkumar/0000-0003-4253-8581; Gopal,
   Surendra/0000-0002-9842-5044; Jalaja Rajan, Lakshmy/0000-0001-8598-7876
FU Kerala Agricultural University [COF/Acad(1)/1687/15]; Publication Fund
   of the TU Dresden
FX This research was funded by Kerala Agricultural University grant number
   COF/Acad(1)/1687/15 and the APC was funded by the Publication Fund of
   the TU Dresden.
CR Ajeesh R, 2017, J TROP FOR SCI, V29, P395, DOI 10.26525/jtfs2017.29.4.395403
   ALLEN MF, 1982, NEW PHYTOL, V91, P191, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1982.tb03305.x
   Ananthakrishnan G, 2004, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V100, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2003.07.008
   Anjum SA, 2011, PLANT SOIL ENVIRON, V57, P326, DOI 10.17221/41/2011-PSE
   Aroca R, 2008, J EXP BOT, V59, P2029, DOI 10.1093/jxb/ern057
   AUGE R M, 1986, Plant Physiology (Rockville), V82, P765, DOI 10.1104/pp.82.3.765
   Augé RM, 2004, CAN J SOIL SCI, V84, P373, DOI 10.4141/S04-002
   Augé RM, 2001, MYCORRHIZA, V11, P3, DOI 10.1007/s005720100097
   Augé RM, 2008, MYCORRHIZA, V18, P115, DOI 10.1007/s00572-008-0162-9
   BAGYARAJ DJ, 1992, METHOD MICROBIOL, V24, P359, DOI 10.1016/S0580-9517(08)70102-8
   Begum N, 2019, PLANTS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/plants8120579
   Begum N, 2019, FRONT PLANT SCI, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2019.01068
   Biswal Basanti, 2008, P167, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-76326-0_8
   Borowicz VA, 2001, ECOLOGY, V82, P3057
   Bray EA, 1997, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V2, P48, DOI 10.1016/S1360-1385(97)82562-9
   Brenes-Arguedas T, 2011, OECOLOGIA, V166, P443, DOI 10.1007/s00442-010-1832-9
   Cerasoli S, 2014, AOB PLANTS, V6, DOI 10.1093/aobpla/plu018
   Cornic G., 1996, Photosynthesis and the Environment, P347, DOI [10.1007/0-306-48135-9_14, DOI 10.1007/0-306-48135-9_14]
   Dar M. H., 2017, Russian Agricultural Sciences, V43, P138, DOI 10.3103/S1068367417020057
   Din J, 2011, J ANIM PLANT SCI, V21, P78
   Domuța C., 2011, Analele Universitații din Oradea, Fascicula: Protecția Mediului, V16, P229
   Engelbrecht BMJ, 2003, OECOLOGIA, V136, P383, DOI 10.1007/s00442-003-1290-8
   GERDEMANN J. W., 1963, TRANS BRIT MYCOL SOC, V46, P235
   Giovannetti M., 1980, NEW PHYTOL, V84, P489, DOI 101111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04556.x
   Giovannetti M, 2006, PLANT SIGNAL BEHAV, V1, P1, DOI 10.4161/psb.1.1.2277
   Hetherington AM, 2003, NATURE, V424, P901, DOI 10.1038/nature01843
   Hoagland D. R., 1938, Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution, P461
   Jones H. G, 2009, PLANTS MICROCLIMATE
   Karagiannidis N, 2002, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V94, P145, DOI 10.1016/S0304-4238(01)00336-3
   Lahr EC, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P4221, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13010
   Lamb D, 2005, SCIENCE, V310, P1628, DOI 10.1126/science.1111773
   Larekeng SH, 2019, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V270, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/270/1/012022
   Mahari A., FACTORS AFFECTING SU
   MARSCHNER H, 1994, PLANT SOIL, V159, P89, DOI 10.1007/BF00000098
   Mathur N, 2000, J ARID ENVIRON, V45, P191, DOI 10.1006/jare.2000.0644
   Medrano H, 2002, ANN BOT-LONDON, V89, P895, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcf079
   Miller R. M., 2000, ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZ, P3, DOI [10.1007/978-94-017-0776-3_1, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-0776-3_1]
   Morte A, 2001, BIOL PLANTARUM, V44, P263, DOI 10.1023/A:1010207610974
   MOSSE B, 1981, ADV MICROB ECOL, V5, P137
   Mott KA, 2010, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V33, P1084, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02129.x
   PENG SB, 1993, PLANT PHYSIOL, V101, P1063, DOI 10.1104/pp.101.3.1063
   PHILLIPS JM, 1970, T BRIT MYCOL SOC, V55, P158, DOI 10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3
   POORTER H, 1990, PLANT PHYSIOL, V94, P621, DOI 10.1104/pp.94.2.621
   Rahimzadeh S, 2017, MYCORRHIZA, V27, P537, DOI 10.1007/s00572-017-0775-y
   Rajan SK, 2000, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V126, P91, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00089-4
   Ramos F.R., 2019, ADV FOR SCI, V6, P493, DOI [10.34062/afs.v6i1.5735, DOI 10.34062/AFS.V6I1.5735]
   Rapparini F., 2014, Use of Microbes for the Alleviation of Soil Stresses, V1, P21
   Rillig MC, 2006, NEW PHYTOL, V171, P41, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01750.x
   Rodríguez-Morelos VH, 2014, REV CHIL HIST NAT, V87, DOI 10.1186/s40693-014-0009-z
   Ryan MH, 2002, PLANT SOIL, V244, P263, DOI 10.1023/A:1020207631893
   Sánchez-Blanco MJ, 2004, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V161, P675, DOI 10.1078/0176-1617-01191
   Saraswathi SG, 2011, J ENVIRON BIOL, V32, P173
   Saravanavel R., 2011, Recent Research in Science and Technology, V3, P177
   SCHOLANDER PF, 1965, SCIENCE, V148, P339, DOI 10.1126/science.148.3668.339
   Sharma MP, 1996, MYCORRHIZA, V6, P441, DOI 10.1007/s005720050144
   Sneha C, 2013, CURR SCI INDIA, V104, P348
   Subramanian KS, 1997, MYCORRHIZA, V7, P25, DOI 10.1007/s005720050159
   TAKEBE M, 1989, JARQ-JPN AGR RES Q, V23, P86
   Tavakkol-Afshari R., 2010, INT J BIOL SCI, V6, P216
   TURNER N.C., 1980, PHYSIOLOGICAL ADAPTA, P123, DOI DOI 10.1111/1365-3040.EP11572630
   von Caemmerer S, 2004, J EXP BOT, V55, P1157, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erh128
   Williams JW, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P5738, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0606292104
   WILLIAMS RF, 1946, ANN BOT-LONDON, V10, P41, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083119
   WONG SC, 1985, PLANT PHYSIOL, V78, P826, DOI 10.1104/pp.78.4.826
   Wu QS, 2006, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V163, P417, DOI 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.04.024
   Yang YR, 2014, J PLANT GROWTH REGUL, V33, P612, DOI 10.1007/s00344-013-9410-0
   Zhu XC, 2012, PLANT SOIL ENVIRON, V58, P186, DOI 10.17221/23/2011-PSE
   Zhu XC, 2011, PLANT SOIL, V346, P189, DOI 10.1007/s11104-011-0809-8
NR 68
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 1
U2 21
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 1999-4907
J9 FORESTS
JI Forests
PD MAY
PY 2020
VL 11
IS 5
AR 488
DI 10.3390/f11050488
PG 15
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA MB6UE
UT WOS:000542736000011
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Cinar, I
AF Cinar, Ismail
TI Assessing the Correlation between Land Cover Conversion and Temporal
   Climate Change-A Pilot Study in Coastal Mediterranean City, Fethiye,
   Turkey
SO ATMOSPHERE
LA English
DT Article
DE air temperature; LULC change; CORINE index; RS; sustainable
   urbanization; climate change
ID SURFACE TEMPERATURE; GREEN SPACES; HEAT-ISLAND; VEGETATION; TRENDS;
   IMPACT; ENVIRONMENT; HYDROLOGY; PATTERNS
AB The rapid growth and expansion of urbanized landscapes in cities has resulted in an increase in air temperature and has lowered the bioclimatic comfort levels in urban landscapes. Recent studies to estimate the climatic response of urban landscape conversion have mostly examined the relationship between land use/land cover (LULC) change and land surface temperature (LST) data collected using advanced remote sensing (RS) techniques instead of atmospheric temperature. In this respect, four decadal Landsat images from the 1980s were used to investigate the impact of landscape transformation on atmospheric temperature. The mean and average minimum and maximum monthly air temperature datasets were used in the analysis. The CORINE (Coordination of Information on Environment) index was used to determine LULC diversity in an urban development boundary and urban periphery. Consequently, clustered LULC change values for the last three decades were integrated with decadal air temperature anomalies. The findings revealed an important relationship between monthly mean air temperature and land changes over recent decades, which resulted in an increase in urban fabric land use, deforestation land cover changes and conversion of permanent crop fields to artificial green houses for earlier vegetable production; the R-sqr values for these regressions were 97.7%, 88.5% and 90.6% respectively. On the other hand, the most important increasing temperature trends were obtained for the average monthly minimum air temperature, which supports the global warming concerns of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) and related studies, which have concluded that an increased nighttime temperature results in urban heat islands (UHIs). The results should be used to support better urban landscape plans and architectural designs to improve human thermal comfort for sustainable urban life in Mediterranean cities. Street geometry and orientation to wind breeze, the Height/Width H/W ratio of buildings, and sizes of open and green spaces should be examined carefully in urban planning and design for climate adaptation.
C1 Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Dept Landscape, TR-48306 Fethiye, Turkey.
C3 Mugla Sitki Kocman University
RP Cinar, I (corresponding author), Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Dept Landscape, TR-48306 Fethiye, Turkey.
EM icinar@mu.edu.tr
FU Department of Research Foundation of Mugla Sitki Kocman University
   [2011/27]
FX Part of this research was supported by the Department of Research
   Foundation of Mugla Sitki Kocman University Project Number: 2011/27. I
   am thankful to the State Meteorological Office of Fethiye for providing
   climatological data and to Erdogan Gavcar for statistical revision
   (Department of Numerical Analysis, Faculty of Business and
   Administration, Mugla Sitki Kocman University) and to Ihsan Cicek
   (Department of Geography, Faculty of Letters, Ankara University) for
   examining the conclusion, designing the framework, and editing and
   revising the manuscript. The author also thanks editors and anonymous
   reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.
CR ACKERMAN B, 1985, J CLIM APPL METEOROL, V24, P547, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1985)024<0547:TMOTCH>2.0.CO;2
   Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Altinsoy H, 2011, P NAT GEOGR C INT PA
   Araya YH, 2010, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V2, P1549, DOI 10.3390/rs2061549
   Barati AA, 2015, INT J ENVIRON RES, V9, P281
   BERNATZKY A, 1982, ENERG BUILDINGS, V5, P1, DOI 10.1016/0378-7788(82)90022-6
   Carlson TN, 2000, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V25, P49, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8181(00)00021-7
   Chen XL, 2006, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V104, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2005.11.016
   Cheng KS, 2008, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V85, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.014
   Feng XY, 2012, INT J ENVIRON RES, V6, P499
   Georgi JN, 2010, BUILD ENVIRON, V45, P1401, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.12.003
   Gibbard S, 2005, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V32, DOI 10.1029/2005GL024550
   Govindasamy B, 2001, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V28, P291, DOI 10.1029/2000GL006121
   Gulinck H, 2001, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V55, P257, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00159-1
   Han KS, 2004, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V92, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2004.05.005
   Iyigun C, 2013, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V114, P95, DOI 10.1007/s00704-012-0823-7
   Jenerette GD, 2011, ECOL APPL, V21, P2637, DOI 10.1890/10-1493.1
   Klok L, 2012, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V64, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.01.009
   KRUSKAL WH, 1952, J AM STAT ASSOC, V47, P583, DOI 10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441
   Li JJ, 2009, ECOL COMPLEX, V6, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.02.002
   Mahmood R, 2006, INT J CLIMATOL, V26, P1091, DOI 10.1002/joc.1298
   Masek JG, 2008, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V112, P2914, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2008.02.010
   McCarthy J.J., 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE IMPAC
   Odindi JO, 2012, INT J ENVIRON RES, V6, P653
   Osborne TM, 2004, CLIM DYNAM, V23, P45, DOI 10.1007/s00382-004-0421-1
   Owen TW, 1998, INT J REMOTE SENS, V19, P1663, DOI 10.1080/014311698215171
   Saptomo SK, 2004, PADDY WATER ENVIRON, V2, P73, DOI 10.1007/s10333-004-0047-2
   Schwarz N, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V18, P693, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.001
   Sen B, 2012, CLIM RES, V52, P175, DOI 10.3354/cr01074
   Shashua-Bar L, 2011, INT J CLIMATOL, V31, P1498, DOI 10.1002/joc.2177
   Song CH, 2005, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V95, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2005.01.002
   Stone B, 2009, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V43, P9052, DOI 10.1021/es902150g
   Su WZ, 2014, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V6, P6799, DOI 10.3390/su6106799
   Tian YC, 2014, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V6, P10593, DOI 10.3390/rs61110593
   Türkes M, 2004, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V77, P195, DOI 10.1007/s00704-003-0024-5
   Türkes M, 2002, INT J CLIMATOL, V22, P947, DOI 10.1002/joc.777
   Turkes M., 2011, GLOBAL WARMING KYOTO, P21
   Turkes M, 2011, 5 ATM SCI S P BOOK 2, p[27, 135]
   Vancutsem C, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P449, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2009.10.002
   Voogt JA, 2003, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V86, P370, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00079-8
   Wang Bin, 2013, Acta Ecologica Sinica, V33, P1701
   Weng QH, 2004, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V89, P467, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.005
   Weng QH, 2009, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V64, P335, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.03.007
   Willems E., LANDSCAPE LAND COVER
   Xiao HL, 2007, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V85, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.07.016
   Yu C, 2006, ENERG BUILDINGS, V38, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.04.003
   Zhang X, 2009, INT J REMOTE SENS, V30, P2105, DOI 10.1080/01431160802549252
NR 47
TC 13
Z9 13
U1 2
U2 50
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4433
J9 ATMOSPHERE-BASEL
JI Atmosphere
PD AUG
PY 2015
VL 6
IS 8
BP 1102
EP 1118
DI 10.3390/atmos6081102
PG 17
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA CQ4HM
UT WOS:000360565400007
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Nice, KA
   Demuzere, M
   Coutts, AM
   Tapper, N
AF Nice, Kerry A.
   Demuzere, Matthias
   Coutts, Andrew M.
   Tapper, Nigel
TI Present day and future urban cooling enabled by integrated water
   management
SO FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE integrated water management; climate change; TARGET; Local Climate
   Zones; climate adaptation strategies; cooling benefits
ID LOCAL CLIMATE ZONES; DESIGN; MODEL; IRRIGATION; VEGETATION; CAPACITY;
   CITIES; SYSTEM
AB The process of urbanisation has increased public health risks due to urban heat, risks that will be further exacerbated in future decades by climate change. However, the growing adoption of integrated water management (IWM) practices (coordinated stormwater management of water, land, and resources) provides an opportunity to support urban heat amelioration through water supply provision and irrigated and vegetated infrastructure that can provide cooling benefits. This study examines the thermal impacts of future implementations of IWM for nine Australian cities based on a review of Government policy documents in the present and over two future time frames (2030 and 2050) under different greenhouse gas emission scenarios (SSPs 1.2-6, 3.7-0 and 5.8-5). Statistical analysis of the future climate data using historical data shows that future warming is nuanced, with changes variable in both time and place, and with extremes becoming more pronounced in future. We have developed a unique approach to morph the future climate projections onto historical data (derived from the ERA5 Reanalysis product) for the 2010-2020 period. Additionally, we use locally appropriate Local Climate Zones (LCZs) for Australian cities, resulting from a holistic and global approach that is widely adopted by the urban climate modelling community. We developed scenarios for business-as-usual as well as implementation of moderate and high levels of IWM across each of the Australian LCZs and modelled them using TARGET (The Air temperature Response to Green infrastructure Evaluation Tool). Results generated at the LCZ level are aggregated to Australian statistical areas (SA4, the largest sub-city area) and city-wide levels. The thermal impacts associated with the various degrees of IWM were marked and geographically differentiated, depending on the climatic characteristics of the various cities. For the current climate, high IWM intervention provided reductions in annual mean daily maximum temperature ranging from -0.77 degrees C in Darwin, up to -1.86 degrees C in Perth. Generally, the drier southern cities of Sydney, Canberra, Albury, Melbourne, Adelaide, and Perth produced the greatest thermal response to implementation of IWM and the more tropical cities with higher rainfalls the least response. For some southern cities cooling was > -3.0 degrees C at the time of maximum summer temperatures. Interestingly high levels of IWM in winter produced modest warming of minimum overnight temperatures, especially for the cooler southern cities. The cooling benefits of IWM were seen across all future climate scenarios and are a real opportunity to offset-projected temperature increases resulting from climate change.
C1 [Nice, Kerry A.] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Transport Hlth Urban Syst Res Lab, Parkville, Vic, Australia.
   [Demuzere, Matthias] B Kode, Ghent, Belgium.
   [Coutts, Andrew M.; Tapper, Nigel] Monash Univ, Sch Earth Atmosphere & Environm, Clayton, Vic, Australia.
C3 University of Melbourne; Monash University
RP Nice, KA (corresponding author), Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Transport Hlth Urban Syst Res Lab, Parkville, Vic, Australia.; Demuzere, M (corresponding author), B Kode, Ghent, Belgium.
EM kerry.nice@unimelb.edu.au; matthias@b-kobe.be
RI Demuzere, Matthias/HOF-7046-2023; Nice, Kerry/N-2794-2018
OI Demuzere, Matthias/0000-0003-3237-4077; Nice, Kerry/0000-0001-6102-1292
FU Australian Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (DAWE)
FX The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research,
   authorship, and/or publication of this article. Funding for KN, MD, AMC,
   and NT were provided by the Australian Department of Agriculture, Water
   and the Environment (DAWE).
CR ACT Government, 2019, CANBERRAS LIVING INF
   [Anonymous], 2000, INTEGRATED WATER RES
   Belcher S. E., 2005, Building Services Engineering Research & Technology, V26, P49, DOI 10.1191/0143624405bt112oa
   Bowler DE, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V97, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
   Broadbent AM, 2019, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V12, P785, DOI 10.5194/gmd-12-785-2019
   Broadbent AM, 2018, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V134, P1, DOI 10.1007/s00704-017-2241-3
   Brunner J, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P231, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2012.733525
   Cheung PK, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101310
   Cheung PK, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102974
   Cheung PK, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V130, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.12.013
   Ching J, 2018, B AM METEOROL SOC, V99, P1907, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0236.1
   City of Paramatta, 2021, Urban Forest
   City of Port Phillip, 2018, City of Port Phillip WSUD Guidelines
   Coutts AM, 2016, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V124, P55, DOI 10.1007/s00704-015-1409-y
   Coutts AM, 2013, PROG PHYS GEOG, V37, P2, DOI 10.1177/0309133312461032
   Demuzere M, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V10, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2014.10.012
   Demuzere M, 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V146, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025
   Demuzere M, 2022, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V14, P3835, DOI 10.5194/essd-14-3835-2022
   Eyring V, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P1937, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
   Geoscape, 2022, Geoscape Surface Cover: Product Description Version 1.7
   Hendel M, 2016, URBAN CLIM, V16, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.02.003
   Hersbach H, 2020, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V146, P1999, DOI 10.1002/qj.3803
   Jamei E, 2019, APPROACHES TO WATER SENSITIVE URBAN DESIGN: POTENTIAL, DESIGN, ECOLOGICAL HEALTH, URBAN GREENING, ECONOMICS, POLICIES, AND COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS, P381, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-812843-5.00019-8
   Jia H., 2020, Hydrolink, V4, P100
   Jia SQ, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V201, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107988
   Krayenhoff ES, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abdcf1
   Li XC, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab9be3
   Loughnan ME, 2010, APPL GEOGR, V30, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.08.003
   Manteghi G., 2015, Modern Applied Science, V9, P1, DOI DOI 10.5539/MAS.V9N6P1
   Martilli A, 2020, URBAN CLIM, V31, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100541
   Masson-Delmotte V., 2021, Climate change 2021: The physical science basis, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781009157896, 10.1017/9781009157896.002, DOI 10.1017/9781009157896.002]
   Middel A, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V687, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.085
   Nazarian N, 2022, EARTHS FUTURE, V10, DOI 10.1029/2022EF002682
   New South Wales, 2021, State Environmental Planning Policy Design and Place
   Newton PW, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12114745
   Nice KA, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V224, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109502
   Nicholls N, 2008, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V52, P375, DOI 10.1007/s00484-007-0132-5
   NSW Department of Planning Environment, 2015, Apartment Design Guide
   Oke T. R., 2017, Urban Climates, DOI [10.1017/9781139016476, DOI 10.1017/9781139016476]
   Perkins-Kirkpatrick SE, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-16970-7
   Probst N, 2022, BLUE-GREEN SYST, V4, P348, DOI 10.2166/bgs.2022.028
   Pulkkinen J, 2021, DATA BRIEF, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107209
   Renouf Marguerite A., 2020, Milestone report
   Santamouris M, 2017, SOL ENERGY, V154, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2016.12.006
   Shashua-Bar L, 2000, ENERG BUILDINGS, V31, P221, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(99)00018-3
   Solcerova A, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10060741
   Spronken-Smith RA, 1998, INT J REMOTE SENS, V19, P2085, DOI 10.1080/014311698214884
   State of Victoria, 2017, Integrated Water Management Framework for Victoria: An IWM Approach to Urban Water Planning and Shared Decision Making Throughout Victoria
   Stewart ID, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P1879, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00019.1
   Theeuwes NE, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V118, P8881, DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50704
   Varghese B. M., 2024, Heat-Attributable Hospitalisations and Associated Costs: Current Risk, Future Projection, and Intervention Effectiveness: A Multi-site Study in Australia, 2010-2019
   Völker S, 2013, ERDKUNDE, V67, P355, DOI 10.3112/erdkunde.2013.04.05
   Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils (WSROC), 2021, Turn Down the Heat
   Whiteoak K, 2019, APPROACHES TO WATER SENSITIVE URBAN DESIGN: POTENTIAL, DESIGN, ECOLOGICAL HEALTH, URBAN GREENING, ECONOMICS, POLICIES, AND COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS, P287, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-812843-5.00014-9
   Wong THF, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V60, P673, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.436
   Woods-Ballard B., 2007, THE SUDS MANUAL, VVol. C697
   Yang GY, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101932
   Zhao L, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-00958-8
NR 58
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 3
U2 3
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2624-9634
J9 FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES
JI Front. Sustain. Cities
PD APR 4
PY 2024
VL 6
AR 1337449
DI 10.3389/frsc.2024.1337449
PG 17
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology;
   Urban Studies
GA OB2N7
UT WOS:001204736400001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Reddy, YTN
   Raj, AVV
AF Reddy, Y. T. N.
   Raj, A. V. Vineeth
BE Ravishankar, H
   Garg, N
   Mishra, M
TI Standardization of Rootstock in Mango
SO GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON AUGMENTING PRODUCTION AND UTILIZATION OF MANGO:
   BIOTIC AND ABIOTIC STRESSES
SE Acta Horticulturae
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT Global Conference on Augmenting Production and Utilization of Mango -
   Biotic and Abiotic Stresses
CY JUN 21-24, 2011
CL Lucknow, INDIA
SP Int Soc Horticultural Sci
DE monoembryonic; edaphic; vigour management; polyembryonic; rootstock;
   heterogeneous; compatibility; Mangifera; high density orcharding
ID GROWTH
AB Rootstocks in mango are always seedlings whether they are of zygotic or nucellar origin. Clonal nucellar seedlings rootstocks have many advantages over heterogenous monoembryonic seedling rootstocks. Clonal rootstocks have been selected for specific soil types and stress tolerance and behavior of the scion cultivar on clonal rootstocks is highly predictable. With the intensification of fruit production due to socio-economic considerations, the role of rootstocks in commercial fruit production has increased considerably in the recent past. Although rootstocks have several applications such as improving fruit quality, imparting adaptability to climatic and edaphic conditions and inducing dwarfing, the priorities of rootstocks selection in the tropics and subtropics have been focused mainly on vigour management and securing regular high fruit yields. Mango is an important fruit crop of the tropical and subtropical regions. The yield is less than 10 t/ha in most of the growing countries. Low planting densities based on the expected eventual tree size, propagation on seedling rootstocks of unknown pedigree and irregular bearing habits are some of major reasons for low orchard efficiency of mangoes in India. In India and Mexico, monoembryonic seedlings are generally used as rootstocks. Polyembryonic 'Turpentine' seedlings are used as rootstocks in Florida. Either polyembryonic 'Saber' or '13-1' seedlings are used as rootstocks in Israel. In Australia, 'Kensington' seedlings are used as rootstock. Throughout South-East Asia polyembryonic seedlings are used for rootstocks. Use of nondescript mango stones for multiplication of rootstocks has led to enormous variation in the performance of mango clones in the orchards. Some attempts have been made to standardize the rootstocks for various scion cultivars including the use of polyembryonic cultivars for vigour management, salinity drought, stress tolerance, fruit yield and quality. There are relative advantages of polyembryonic rootstocks in mango. In many regions including India and Mexico scion cultivars are still being propagated on heterogenous monoembryonic seedling rootstocks despite the demonstrated advantages of clonal nucellar rootstocks. The potential of clonally propagated manoembryonic rootstock has not been properly investigated. Other Mangifera sp. also have interesting attributes and should be screened for graft compatibility with mango. The species that could be tested as rootstock for mango might extend mango cultivation to areas where abiotic and biotic stresses currently limit production and could provide a better source for dwarfing rootstocks for high density orcharding.
C1 [Reddy, Y. T. N.; Raj, A. V. Vineeth] Indian Inst Hort Res, Bangalore 560089, Karnataka, India.
C3 Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR); ICAR - Indian Institute
   of Horticultural Research
RP Reddy, YTN (corresponding author), Indian Inst Hort Res, Hessaraghatta Lake PO, Bangalore 560089, Karnataka, India.
CR Casierra-Posada Fánor, 2009, Agron. colomb., V27, P367
   Chandan P. M., 2006, International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, V2, P594
   Gunjate RT, 2009, ACTA HORTIC, V820, P69, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.820.5
   Litz R.E., 2009, MANGO, P530
   Mahabir Singh Mahabir Singh, 2006, International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, V2, P564
   Majumdar P. K., 1989, Acta Horticulturae, P157
   Nartvaranant P., 2003, Thai Journal of Agricultural Science, V36, P193
   Reddy YTN, 2003, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V97, P95, DOI 10.1016/S0304-4238(02)00025-0
   Singh S., 2004, BOMBAI HORTICULTURAL, V17
   Zuazo VHD, 2006, EUR J HORTIC SCI, V71, P102
NR 10
TC 2
Z9 3
U1 0
U2 4
PU INT SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
PI LEUVEN 1
PA PO BOX 500, 3001 LEUVEN 1, BELGIUM
SN 0567-7572
EI 2406-6168
BN 978-94-62610-57-6
J9 ACTA HORTIC
PY 2015
VL 1066
BP 99
EP 108
PG 10
WC Agronomy; Plant Sciences; Horticulture
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Agriculture; Plant Sciences
GA BD1HJ
UT WOS:000358017200010
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Javadi, F
   Tun, YT
   Kawase, M
   Guan, KY
   Yamaguchi, H
AF Javadi, Firouzeh
   Tun, Ye Tun
   Kawase, Makoto
   Guan, Kaiyun
   Yamaguchi, Hirofumi
TI Molecular phylogeny of the subgenus <i>Ceratotropis</i> (<i>genus
   Vigna</i>, Leguminosae) reveals three eco-geographical groups and Late
   Pliocene-Pleistocene diversification: evidence from four plastid DNA
   region sequences
SO ANNALS OF BOTANY
LA English
DT Article
DE Subgenus Ceratotropis; Vigna; Leguminosae; diversification; intergenic
   spacer; germination type
ID NONCODING CHLOROPLAST DNA; BAYESIAN-INFERENCE; GENETIC DIVERSITY;
   INTERGENIC SPACER; DIVERGENCE TIMES; ABSOLUTE RATES; AZUKI-BEANS;
   EVOLUTION; WILD; BIOGEOGRAPHY
AB Background and Aims The subgenus Ceratotropis in the genus Vigna is widely distributed from the Himalayan highlands to South, Southeast and East Asia. However, the interspecific and geographical relationships of its members are poorly understood. This study investigates the phylogeny and biogeography of the subgenus Ceratotropis using chloroplast DNA sequence data.
   Methods Sequence data from four intergenic spacer regions (petA-psbJ, psbD-trnT, trnT-trnE and trnT-trnL) of chloroplast DNA, alone and in combination, were analysed using Bayesian and parsimony methods. Divergence times for major clades were estimated with penalized likelihood. Character evolution was examined by means of parsimony optimization and MacClade.
   Key Results Parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses on the combined data demonstrated well-resolved species relationships in which 18 Vigna species were divided into two major geographical clades: the East Asia-Southeast Asian clade and the Indian subcontinent clade. Within these two clades, three well-supported eco-geographical groups, temperate and subtropical ( the East Asia-Southeast Asian clade) and tropical ( the Indian subcontinent clade), are recognized. The temperate group consists of V. minima, V. nepalensis and V. angularis. The subtropical group comprises the V. nakashimae-V. riukiuensis-V. minima subgroup and the V. hirtella-V. exilis-V. umbellata subgroup. The tropical group contains two subgroups: the V. trinervia-V. reflexo-pilosa-V. trilobata subgroup and the V. mungo-V. grandiflora subgroup. An evolutionary rate analysis estimated the divergence time between the East Asia-Southeast Asia clade and the Indian subcontinent clade as 3.62+/-0.3 million years, and that between the temperate and subtropical groups as 2.0+/-0.2 million years.
   Conclusions The findings provide an improved understanding of the interspecific relationships, and ecological and geographical phylogenetic structure of the subgenus Ceratotropis. The quaternary diversification of the subgenus Ceratotropis implicates its geographical dispersal in the south-eastern part of Asia involving adaptation to climatic condition after the collision of the Indian subcontinent with the Asian plate. The phylogenetic results indicate that the epigeal germination is plesiomorphic, and the germination type evolved independently multiple times in this subgenus, implying its limited taxonomic utility.
C1 [Yamaguchi, Hirofumi] Tokyo Univ Agr, Kanagwa, Japan.
   [Guan, Kaiyun] Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Inst Ecol & Geog, Xinjiang, Peoples R China.
   [Kawase, Makoto] Minist Agr & Fishery, Natl Inst Agrobiol Sci, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
   [Tun, Ye Tun] Minist Agr & Irrigat, Agr Res Dept, Yezin, Myanmar.
   [Javadi, Firouzeh] Osaka Prefecture Univ, Osaka, Japan.
C3 Tokyo University of Agriculture; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Xinjiang
   Institute of Ecology & Geography, CAS; National Institute of
   Agrobiological Sciences - Japan; Ministry of Agriculture Forestry &
   Fisheries - Japan; Osaka Metropolitan University
RP Yamaguchi, H (corresponding author), Tokyo Univ Agr, Kanagwa, Japan.
EM h4yamagu@nodai.ac.jp
RI Javadi, Firouzeh/AAD-8960-2020
FU Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15310161, 1831054,
   23310168]; Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15310161, 23310168]
   Funding Source: KAKEN
FX We are particularly grateful to Matthew Lavin for correcting the English
   and providing extremely useful suggestions for improving the manuscript.
   We appreciate the attention of Pat Heslop-Harrison, Jeannette Whitton
   and two anonymous reviewers, whose detailed comments greatly improved
   the manuscript. We also thank Yuichiro Nakayama and Kyoko Yamane for
   technical advice during this research. The study was funded by Grant-in
   Aid for Scientific Research (B) nos 15310161, 1831054 and 23310168 from
   the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
CR BAUDET J C, 1974, Bulletin du Jardin Botanique National de Belgique, V44, P259, DOI 10.2307/3667674
   Baudoin J. P., 1988, Mungbean. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium held at Bangkok, Thailand, 16-20 November 1987., P1
   Brandley MC, 2005, SYST BIOL, V54, P373, DOI 10.1080/10635150590946808
   CHANDEL KPS, 1984, BOT J LINN SOC, V89, P85, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1984.tb01002.x
   Cordaux R, 2004, MOL BIOL EVOL, V21, P1525, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msh151
   Delgado-Salinas A, 2006, SYST BOT, V31, P779, DOI 10.1600/036364406779695960
   Doi K, 2002, GENETICA, V114, P129, DOI 10.1023/A:1015158408227
   Doyle J., 1990, Focus, V12, P13
   DOYLE JJ, 1992, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V89, P7722, DOI 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7722
   Egawa Y., 1988, Mungbean. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium held at Bangkok, Thailand, 16-20 November 1987., P200
   Egawa Y, 1996, JIRCAS J, V3, P49
   Endo Y, 1997, AM J BOT, V84, P523, DOI 10.2307/2446028
   ESSIG FB, 1992, SIDA, V15, P377
   Farris JS, 1995, CLADISTICS, V11, P377, DOI 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1995.tb00096.x
   FATOKUN CA, 1993, THEOR APPL GENET, V86, P97, DOI 10.1007/BF00223813
   FELSENSTEIN J, 1988, ANNU REV GENET, V22, P521, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.002513
   FELSENSTEIN J, 1981, J MOL EVOL, V17, P368, DOI 10.1007/BF01734359
   FELSENSTEIN J, 1985, EVOLUTION, V39, P783, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x
   Fishbein M, 2010, SYST BOT, V35, P77, DOI 10.1600/036364410790862588
   Funk DJ, 2003, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V34, P397, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132421
   GATES RR, 1951, BOT GAZ, V113, P151, DOI 10.1086/335703
   Goel S, 2002, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V22, P1, DOI 10.1006/mpev.2001.1037
   Graham SW, 2000, INT J PLANT SCI, V161, pS83, DOI 10.1086/317583
   HARRISON TM, 1992, SCIENCE, V255, P1663, DOI 10.1126/science.255.5052.1663
   Heenan PB, 2004, BOT J LINN SOC, V146, P439, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2004.00348.x
   Huelsenbeck JP, 1997, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V28, P437, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.437
   Huelsenbeck JP, 2001, SCIENCE, V294, P2310, DOI 10.1126/science.1065889
   Huelsenbeck JP, 2001, BIOINFORMATICS, V17, P754, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
   Ibarra-Manríquez G, 2001, AM J BOT, V88, P1801, DOI 10.2307/3558356
   Javadi F, 2007, BOT J LINN SOC, V154, P175, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00649.x
   KASS RE, 1995, J AM STAT ASSOC, V90, P773, DOI 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572
   Konarev AV, 2002, EUPHYTICA, V123, P165, DOI 10.1023/A:1014920309710
   Lavin M, 2005, SYST BIOL, V54, P575, DOI 10.1080/10635150590947131
   Lavin M, 2008, BOT REV, V74, P178, DOI 10.1007/s12229-008-9006-8
   Linder H. P., 2001, Feddes Repertorium, V112, P59
   Lumpkin T. A., 1994, AZUKI BEAN BOT PRODU
   MADDISON DR, 2000, MACCLADE 4 06 ANAL P
   MAEKAWA F, 1955, JAP J BOT, V15, P103
   MARECHAL R, 1978, Boissiera, V28, P1
   Mimura M, 2000, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V47, P603, DOI 10.1023/A:1026584824584
   Nylander JAA, 2004, SYST BIOL, V53, P47, DOI 10.1080/10635150490264699
   Polhill R.M., 1981, Advanced in Legume Systematics, V1, P1
   Posada D, 2004, SYST BIOL, V53, P793, DOI 10.1080/10635150490522304
   Posada D, 1998, BIOINFORMATICS, V14, P817, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817
   Pujol B, 2005, NEW PHYTOL, V166, P305, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01295.x
   RAUBESON LA, 1992, SCIENCE, V255, P1697, DOI 10.1126/science.255.5052.1697
   Saini A, 2009, PLANT SYST EVOL, V280, P187, DOI 10.1007/s00606-009-0178-4
   Sanderson MJ, 2002, MOL BIOL EVOL, V19, P101, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003974
   Sanderson MJ, 2003, BIOINFORMATICS, V19, P301, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.301
   Sang T, 1997, AM J BOT, V84, P1120, DOI 10.2307/2446155
   SAWA M, 1983, J MICHURIN BIOL, V18, P3
   Seehalak W, 2006, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V53, P1043, DOI 10.1007/s10722-004-7939-2
   Shaw J, 2005, AM J BOT, V92, P142, DOI 10.3732/ajb.92.1.142
   Shaw J, 2007, AM J BOT, V94, P275, DOI 10.3732/ajb.94.3.275
   Smartt J., 1990, Grain legumes. Evolution and genetic resources, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511525483, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511525483]
   Spicer RA, 2003, NATURE, V421, P622, DOI 10.1038/nature01356
   SWINDELL RE, 1973, J HERED, V64, P107, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a108350
   Swofford D. L., 2002, PAUP PHYLOGENETIC AN, DOI DOI 10.1002/0471650129.DOB0522
   TABERLET P, 1991, PLANT MOL BIOL, V17, P1105, DOI 10.1007/BF00037152
   Tamura K, 2007, MOL BIOL EVOL, V24, P1596, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msm092
   TATEISHI Y, 1990, SERIES ENTOM, V46, P189
   Tateishi Y., 1996, MUNGBEAN GERMPLASM C, P9
   TATEISHI Y, 1985, THESIS TOHOKU U JAPA
   TATEISHI Y, 1983, STRUCTURE DYNAMICS V, P131
   Thompson JD, 1997, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V25, P4876, DOI 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876
   Thulin M, 2004, SYST BOT, V29, P903, DOI 10.1600/0363644042451035
   Tomooka N., 2002, Kew Bulletin, V57, P613, DOI 10.2307/4110989
   Tomooka N, 2002, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V49, P521, DOI 10.1023/A:1020954800107
   Tomooka N., 1991, Mungbean and the genetic resources, the subgenus Ceratotropis
   Tomooka N., 2002, The Asian Vigna: Genus Vigna Subgenus Ceratotropis Genetic Resources
   Tun YT, 2008, BREEDING SCI, V58, P325, DOI 10.1270/jsbbs.58.325
   VERDCOURT B, 1970, Kew Bulletin, V24, P507, DOI 10.2307/4102859
   Wood TE, 2009, AM J BOT, V96, P853, DOI 10.3732/ajb.0800153
   YAMAGUCHI H, 1992, ECON BOT, V46, P384, DOI 10.1007/BF02866509
   Yano A, 2004, ECON BOT, V58, pS135, DOI 10.1663/0013-0001(2004)58[S135:ATFMIO]2.0.CO;2
   Yasuda K, 1996, BREEDING SCI, V46, P337
   Ye T.T., 2007, BREEDING SCI, V57, P271
   Zong XX, 2003, GENOME, V46, P647, DOI 10.1139/G03-041
NR 78
TC 29
Z9 30
U1 1
U2 24
PU OXFORD UNIV PRESS
PI OXFORD
PA GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND
SN 0305-7364
EI 1095-8290
J9 ANN BOT-LONDON
JI Ann. Bot.
PD AUG
PY 2011
VL 108
IS 2
BP 367
EP 380
DI 10.1093/aob/mcr141
PG 14
WC Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences
GA 799QF
UT WOS:000293300500013
PM 21725064
OA Green Published, Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Smith, FA
   Crawford, DL
   Harding, LE
   Lease, HM
   Murray, IW
   Raniszewski, A
   Youberg, KM
AF Smith, Felisa A.
   Crawford, Dolly L.
   Harding, Larisa E.
   Lease, Hilary M.
   Murray, Ian W.
   Raniszewski, Adrienne
   Youberg, Kristin M.
TI A tale of two species: Extirpation and range expansion during the late
   Quaternary in an extreme environment
SO GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptation; climate change; evolution; Bergmann's rule; Neotoma; body
   size
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; HOLOCENE VEGETATION; EVOLUTIONARY RESPONSE; LATE
   PLEISTOCENE; BODY-SIZE; GENETIC DIVERSITY; WOODRATS NEOTOMA; BERGMANNS
   RULE; NORTH-ATLANTIC; MOJAVE DESERT
AB Death Valley, California is today the hottest hyperarid area in the western Hemisphere with temperatures of 57 degrees C (134 degrees F) recorded. During the late Quaternary, pluvial Lake Manly covered much of the Valley and contributed to a much more moderate climate. The abrupt draining of Lake Manly in the mid-Holocene and coincident dramatic shifts in temperature and aridity exerted substantial selection pressure on organisms living in this area. Our research investigates the adaptive response of Neotoma (woodrats) to temperature change over the late Quaternary along a steep elevational and environmental gradient. By combining fieldwork, examination of museum specimens, and collection of paleomiddens, our project reconstructs the divergent evolutionary histories of animals from the valley floor and nearby mountain gradients (-84 to >3400 m). We report on recent paleomidden work investigating a transition zone in the Grapevine Mountains (Amargosa Range) for two species of woodrats differing significantly in size and habitat preferences: N. lepida, the desert woodrat, and N. cinerea, the bushy-tailed woodrat. Here, at the limits of these species' thermal and ecological thresholds, we demonstrate dramatic fluctuations in the range boundaries over the Holocene as climate shifted. Moreover, we find fundamental differences in the adaptive response of these two species related to the elevation of the site and local microclimate. Results indicate that although N. cinerea are currently extirpated in this area, they were ubiquitous throughout the late Pleistocene and into the middle Holocene. They adapted to climate shifts over this period by phenotypic changes in body mass, as has been demonstrated for other areas within their range; during colder episodes they were larger, and during warmer intervals, animals were smaller. Their presence may have been tied into a much more widespread historical distribution of juniper (Juniperus sp.); we document a downward displacement of approximately 1000 m relative to juniper's modern extent in the Amargosa Range. These results suggest a cooler and more mesic habitat association persisting for longer and at lower elevations than previously reported. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Smith, Felisa A.; Crawford, Dolly L.; Harding, Larisa E.; Lease, Hilary M.; Murray, Ian W.; Raniszewski, Adrienne; Youberg, Kristin M.] Univ New Mexico, Dept Biol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA.
C3 University of New Mexico
RP Smith, FA (corresponding author), Univ New Mexico, Dept Biol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA.
EM fasmith@unm.edu
RI Smith, Felisa/ABE-6160-2021
OI Harding, Larisa E/0009-0001-4778-4071; Smith, Felisa/0000-0001-6262-436X
FU Smithsonian Natural History Museum; Museum of Vertebrate Zoology
   (University of California Berkeley); Museum of Southwest Biology
   (University of New Mexico); University of Arizona; Chicago Field Museum;
   Burke Museum (University of Washington); NSF [BIO-DEB-0344620]
FX We thank the many curators and museum associates of the Smithsonian
   Natural History Museum, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (University of
   California Berkeley), Museum of Southwest Biology (University of New
   Mexico), University of Arizona, Chicago Field Museum, and Burke Museum
   (University of Washington) for their assistance with specimens; D.M.
   Kaufman, E.A. Elliott Smith, and R.E. Elliott Smith provided assistance
   with data entry. Julio Betancourt and an anonymous reviewer provided
   helpful comments on the manuscript. We thank M. Essington and D. Ek of
   the National Park Service for administrative and logistical support for
   fieldwork within Death Valley National Park. Funding was provided for
   field and laboratory work by NSF BIO-DEB-0344620 to FAS.
CR ALLEN BD, 1993, SCIENCE, V260, P1920, DOI 10.1126/science.260.5116.1920
   Allen CD, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P14839, DOI 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14839
   Alley RB, 1997, GEOLOGY, V25, P483, DOI 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0483:HCIAPW>2.3.CO;2
   Alley RB, 2005, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V24, P1123, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2004.12.004
   Alley RB, 2000, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V19, P213, DOI 10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00062-1
   Ashton KG, 2000, AM NAT, V156, P390, DOI 10.1086/303400
   [Baede A.P.M. IPCC IPCC], 2007, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis
   Barnosky AD, 2003, J MAMMAL, V84, P354, DOI 10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084<0354:MRTGWO>2.0.CO;2
   Betancourt J. L., 1990, PACKRAT MIDDENS LAST
   BETANCOURT JL, 1981, SCIENCE, V214, P656, DOI 10.1126/science.214.4521.656
   Betancourt JL, 2001, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V165, P71, DOI 10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00154-1
   Bond G, 1997, SCIENCE, V278, P1257, DOI 10.1126/science.278.5341.1257
   BOND GC, 1995, SCIENCE, V267, P1005, DOI 10.1126/science.267.5200.1005
   BRADSHAW AD, 1991, ANN BOT-LONDON, V67, P5, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088209
   Bradshaw WE, 2006, SCIENCE, V312, P1477, DOI 10.1126/science.1127000
   Brown J.H., 1968, Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool., V135, P1
   BROWN JH, 1969, EVOLUTION, V23, P329, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1969.tb03515.x
   Cayan DR, 2001, B AM METEOROL SOC, V82, P399, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<0399:CITOOS>2.3.CO;2
   Chan YL, 2005, BIOL LETT-UK, V1, P423, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0354
   Dahl-Jensen T, 1998, TECTONOPHYSICS, V288, P191, DOI 10.1016/S0040-1951(97)00292-8
   DANSGAARD W, 1993, NATURE, V364, P218, DOI 10.1038/364218a0
   Davis MB, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P673, DOI 10.1126/science.292.5517.673
   De MacPhee R, 2005, BMC EVOL BIOL, V5, DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-5-49
   Easterling DR, 2002, B AM METEOROL SOC, V83, P1327, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083<1327:RCIFDA>2.3.CO;2
   FALCONER DS, 1973, GENET RES, V22, P291, DOI 10.1017/S0016672300013094
   Graham R.W., 1986, COMMUNITY ECOL, P300, DOI 10.7208/9780226115504
   Graham RW, 1996, SCIENCE, V272, P1601
   Hadly EA, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P6893, DOI 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6893
   Hall ER., 1981, MAMMALS N AM
   HARRIS A H, 1984, Carnegie Museum of Natural History Special Publication, P164
   Harris A.H., 1985, LATE PLEISTOCENE VER
   Hegerl GC, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P663
   HOLT RD, 1990, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V5, P311, DOI 10.1016/0169-5347(90)90088-U
   Hughes L, 2000, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V15, P56, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01764-4
   Hunt G, 2006, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V103, P1347, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0510550103
   Huntley B, 2007, HEREDITY, V98, P247, DOI 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800972
   Huntley B, 2006, IBIS, V148, P8, DOI 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2006.00523.x
   Jansen E, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P433
   Koehler PA, 2005, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V215, P297, DOI 10.1016/j.palaeo.2004.09.010
   KOEHLER PA, 1994, GREAT BASIN NAT, V54, P142
   KOEHLER PA, 1995, QUATERNARY RES, V43, P238, DOI 10.1006/qres.1995.1024
   LEE ANTHONY KINGSTON, 1963, UNIV CALIF PUBL ZOOL, V64, P57
   Li JR, 1996, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V123, P179, DOI 10.1016/0031-0182(95)00123-9
   Lyons SK, 2005, AM NAT, V165, pE168, DOI 10.1086/429699
   Lyons SK, 2003, J MAMMAL, V84, P385, DOI 10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084<0385:AQAOTR>2.0.CO;2
   MacArthur R.H., 1972, pvii
   Mensing SA, 2001, QUATERNARY RES, V55, P57, DOI 10.1006/qres.2000.2196
   MEYER HW, 1992, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V99, P71, DOI 10.1016/0031-0182(92)90008-S
   MILLER AH, 1946, ECOLOGY, V27, P54, DOI 10.2307/1931017
   Millien V, 2006, ECOL LETT, V9, P853, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00928.x
   Mueller RC, 2005, J ECOL, V93, P1085, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01042.x
   Parmesan C, 2003, NATURE, V421, P37, DOI 10.1038/nature01286
   PATTON JL, 2004, CONTRIBUCIONES MASTO
   Pörtner HO, 2008, SCIENCE, V322, P690, DOI 10.1126/science.1163156
   Roy K, 2001, ECOL LETT, V4, P366
   SMITH FA, 1995, SCIENCE, V270, P2012, DOI 10.1126/science.270.5244.2012
   Smith FA, 2003, QUATERNARY RES, V59, P160, DOI 10.1016/S0033-5894(03)00004-8
   Smith FA, 1998, ECOGRAPHY, V21, P140, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00668.x
   Smith FA, 2001, EVOL ECOL RES, V3, P595
   Smith FA, 1998, QUATERNARY RES, V50, P1, DOI 10.1006/qres.1998.1982
   Smith FA, 2006, J BIOGEOGR, V33, P2061, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01631.x
   Smith Felisa A., 1997, Mammalian Species, V564, P1
   SMITH JNM, 1979, EVOLUTION, V33, P460, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04698.x
   Spaulding W.G., 1990, P59
   SPAULDING WG, 1991, QUATERNARY RES, V35, P427, DOI 10.1016/0033-5894(91)90055-A
   SPAULDING WG, 1990, QUATERNARY RES, V33, P188, DOI 10.1016/0033-5894(90)90018-G
   SPAULDING WG, 1985, 1329 US GEOL SURV, P43
   SUMNER F. B., 1932, BIBLIOGRAPHIA GENETICA, V9, P1
   Thompson R.S., 1999, Quantitative paleoclimatic reconstructions from late Pleistocene plant macrofossils of the Yucca mountain region, P99
   van Valkenburgh B., 1990, P181
   VANDEVENDER TR, 1985, NATURE, V317, P610, DOI 10.1038/317610a0
   VANDEVENDER TR, 1977, SCIENCE, V198, P189, DOI 10.1126/science.198.4313.189
   VANDEVENDER TR, 1987, QUATERNARY RES, V27, P51, DOI 10.1016/0033-5894(87)90049-4
   VANDEVENDER TR, 1979, SCIENCE, V204, P701, DOI 10.1126/science.204.4394.701
   Wells P.V., 1985, Madrono, V32, P11
   WELLS PV, 1966, SCIENCE, V153, P970, DOI 10.1126/science.153.3739.970
   WELLS PV, 1976, QUATERNARY RES, V6, P223, DOI 10.1016/0033-5894(76)90052-1
   WELLS PV, 1967, SCIENCE, V155, P1640, DOI 10.1126/science.155.3770.1640
   WELLS PV, 1964, SCIENCE, V143, P1171, DOI 10.1126/science.143.3611.1171
   Weninger Bernhard., 2007, CalPal-2007. Cologne Radiocarbon Calibration and Palaeoclimate Research Package
   WIGGINS DA, 1989, EVOLUTION, V43, P1808, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02630.x
   WOODCOCK D, 1986, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V57, P273, DOI 10.1016/0031-0182(86)90016-7
NR 82
TC 15
Z9 23
U1 2
U2 34
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0921-8181
EI 1872-6364
J9 GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE
JI Glob. Planet. Change
PD FEB
PY 2009
VL 65
IS 3-4
SI SI
BP 122
EP 133
DI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.10.015
PG 12
WC Geography, Physical; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Physical Geography; Geology
GA 416NI
UT WOS:000264012400004
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Li, MM
   Zhu, ZZ
   Ren, WW
   Wang, YZ
AF Li, Meimei
   Zhu, Zhongzheng
   Ren, Weiwei
   Wang, Yingzheng
TI Predicting Gross Primary Productivity under Future Climate Change for
   the Tibetan Plateau Based on Convolutional Neural Networks
SO REMOTE SENSING
LA English
DT Article
DE Tibetan Plateau; gross primary productivity; climate change;
   spatiotemporal variation; convolutional neural networks
ID MODEL; COVARIATION; ECOSYSTEM; IMPACTS
AB Gross primary productivity (GPP) is vital for ecosystems and the global carbon cycle, serving as a sensitive indicator of ecosystems' responses to climate change. However, the impact of future climate changes on GPP in the Tibetan Plateau, an ecologically important and climatically sensitive region, remains underexplored. This study aimed to develop a data-driven approach to predict the seasonal and annual variations in GPP in the Tibetan Plateau up to the year 2100 under changing climatic conditions. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was employed to investigate the relationships between GPP and various environmental factors, including climate variables, CO2 concentrations, and terrain attributes. This study analyzed the projected seasonal and annual GPP from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) under four future scenarios: SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5. The results suggest that the annual GPP is expected to significantly increase throughout the 21st century under all future climate scenarios. By 2100, the annual GPP is projected to reach 1011.98 Tg C, 1032.67 Tg C, 1044.35 Tg C, and 1055.50 Tg C under the four scenarios, representing changes of 0.36%, 4.02%, 5.55%, and 5.67% relative to 2021. A seasonal analysis indicates that the GPP in spring and autumn shows more pronounced growth under the SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios due to the extended growing season. Furthermore, the study identified an elevation band between 3000 and 4500 m that is particularly sensitive to climate change in terms of the GPP response. Significant GPP increases would occur in the east of the Tibetan Plateau, including the Qilian Mountains and the upper reaches of the Yellow and Yangtze Rivers. These findings highlight the pivotal role of climate change in driving future GPP dynamics in this region. These insights not only bridge existing knowledge gaps regarding the impact of future climate change on the GPP of the Tibetan Plateau over the coming decades but also provide valuable guidance for the formulation of climate adaptation strategies aimed at ecological conservation and carbon management.
C1 [Li, Meimei] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Ecol, State Key Lab Biocontrol, Shenzhen Campus, Shenzhen 518107, Peoples R China.
   [Zhu, Zhongzheng; Ren, Weiwei] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Tibetan Plateau Res, Natl Tibetan Plateau Data Ctr TPDC, State Key Lab Tibetan Plateau Earth Syst Sci Envir, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Yingzheng] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Earth & Environm Sci, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China.
C3 Sun Yat Sen University; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of
   Tibetan Plateau Research, CAS; Lanzhou University
RP Ren, WW (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Tibetan Plateau Res, Natl Tibetan Plateau Data Ctr TPDC, State Key Lab Tibetan Plateau Earth Syst Sci Envir, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
EM limm35@mail.sysu.edu.cn; zhuzz@itpcas.ac.cn; renweiwei@itpcas.ac.cn;
   wangyzh20@lzu.edu.cn
RI ren, weiwei/AAW-2766-2021
OI Zhu, Zhongzheng/0000-0003-3514-7590
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China;  [42101406]
FX This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (Grant No. 42101406).
CR Ahlström A, 2015, SCIENCE, V348, P895, DOI 10.1126/science.aaa1668
   Beer C, 2010, SCIENCE, V329, P834, DOI 10.1126/science.1184984
   Boonman CCF, 2022, DIVERS DISTRIB, V28, P25, DOI 10.1111/ddi.13431
   Cao B, 2020, CRYOSPHERE, V14, P2581, DOI 10.5194/tc-14-2581-2020
   Chen YZ, 2021, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V27, P5848, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15854
   Cheng W, 2022, SCI DATA, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41597-022-01196-7
   Conrad O, 2015, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V8, P1991, DOI 10.5194/gmd-8-1991-2015
   Deng MS, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14143337
   Eyring V, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P1937, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
   Fawcett AA, 2015, SCIENCE, V350, P1168, DOI 10.1126/science.aad5761
   Friedlingstein P, 2019, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V11, P1783, DOI 10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019
   Grossiord C, 2020, NEW PHYTOL, V226, P1550, DOI 10.1111/nph.16485
   Guo RJ, 2023, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V128, DOI 10.1029/2022JG007100
   Hajima T, 2020, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V13, P2197, DOI 10.5194/gmd-13-2197-2020
   Hilker T, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V121, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2012.02.008
   Höhne N, 2020, NATURE, V579, P25, DOI 10.1038/d41586-020-00571-x
   Hou HY, 2022, EARTHS FUTURE, V10, DOI 10.1029/2021EF002628
   Hu QW, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V810, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152231
   [黄禄丰 Huang Lufeng], 2021, [气候变化研究进展, Progressus Inquisitiones de Mutatione Climatis], V17, P514
   Jiang YZ, 2023, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V15, P621, DOI 10.5194/essd-15-621-2023
   LeCun Y, 2015, NATURE, V521, P436, DOI 10.1038/nature14539
   Li J, 2024, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/rs16111856
   Li WP, 2023, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V14, P286, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2023.02.001
   Li X, 2023, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V4, P319, DOI 10.1038/s43017-023-00409-w
   Liao Weijie, 2024, Shengtaixue Zazhi, V43, P1859, DOI 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202406.006
   Lu J, 2023, FORESTS, V14, DOI 10.3390/f14061201
   Lu QK, 2024, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V912, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169239
   Ma J, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab31e4
   Ma MN, 2018, INT J DIGIT EARTH, V11, P1166, DOI 10.1080/17538947.2017.1381192
   [马敏娜 Ma Minna], 2017, [遥感技术与应用, Remote Sensing Technology and Application], V32, P406
   Pei YY, 2020, ECOL INFORM, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.101052
   Piao SL, 2019, CHIN SCI B-CHIN, V64, P2842, DOI 10.1360/TB-2019-0074
   Piao SL, 2010, NATURE, V467, P43, DOI 10.1038/nature09364
   Ren WW, 2024, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/rs16060956
   Ren WW, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15184527
   Rolf E, 2023, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2303.18087, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2303.18087]
   Schlund M, 2020, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V125, DOI 10.1029/2019JG005619
   Shangguan W, 2023, FORESTS, V14, DOI 10.3390/f14050913
   Stouffer RJ, 2017, B AM METEOROL SOC, V98, P95, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00013.1
   Tang Y, 2021, ECOL INFORM, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101307
   Tian ZK, 2023, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V128, DOI 10.1029/2022JG007122
   Wang H, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15143475
   Wang SH, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V755, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142569
   Wang SH, 2020, SCIENCE, V370, P1295, DOI 10.1126/science.abb7772
   Xu CG, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P948, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0630-6
   Yan H, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108738
   Yan MC, 2022, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/feart.2022.970296
   Yao YT, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P184, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13830
   You YF, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11111287
   Yuan WP, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P1416, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2010.01.022
   Zhang C, 2022, INT J CLIMATOL, V42, P9449, DOI 10.1002/joc.7834
   Zhang S, 2018, ECOL MODEL, V368, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.11.023
   Zhang YC, 2022, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V12, P581, DOI 10.1038/s41558-022-01374-w
   Zhang ZC, 2021, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V13, DOI 10.1029/2021MS002802
   Zhou ZQ, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V117, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106642
   Zhu ZQ, 2023, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V29, P126, DOI 10.1111/gcb.16459
NR 56
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 7
U2 7
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2072-4292
J9 REMOTE SENS-BASEL
JI Remote Sens.
PD OCT
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 19
AR 3723
DI 10.3390/rs16193723
PG 21
WC Environmental Sciences; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Remote Sensing;
   Imaging Science & Photographic Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geology; Remote Sensing; Imaging
   Science & Photographic Technology
GA I8Q7L
UT WOS:001332852600001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Qiao, BJ
   Li, N
   Cui, JP
   Li, DF
   Li, MY
   Xiang, LW
   Borrelli, P
   Famiglietti, J
AF Qiao, Baojin
   Li, Na
   Cui, Jiangpeng
   Li, Dongfeng
   Li, Mengyao
   Xiang, Longwei
   Borrelli, Pasquale
   Famiglietti, Jay
TI Substantial Overestimation of Terrestrial Water Storage Loss in
   Headwater Basins on Earth's Third Pole
SO GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
LA English
DT Article
ID TIBETAN PLATEAU; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SEDIMENT; GRACE; PRECIPITATION;
   GLACIERS; EROSION; RIVER
AB The Tibetan Plateau (TP) is suffering from a substantial decline in terrestrial water storage (TWS) in exorheic basins, threatening water resources that are critical for similar to 2 billion people downstream. TWS changes are commonly estimated using gravity satellites through observations of the total terrestrial mass storage (TMS) change, with an implicit assumption of a negligible contribution from sediment transport. Through long-term (2002-2017) sediment flux observations in seven headwater basins on the TP, we reveal that the gravity satellite-derived TMS has decreased at a rate of 3.85 +/- 0.23 Gt yr-1 in the seven basins, of which 0.35 +/- 0.04 Gt yr-1 is contributed by sediment transport. Neglecting this contribution leads to an overestimation of the TWS loss by 10.1 +/- 1.3%, equivalent to the annual water demand of an additional 0.62 million people in the surrounding nations. Regionally, the overestimation is surprisingly high in the Indus River and Yarkant River basins, reaching up to 50.8%-77.6%.
   Accurate quantification of the change in the terrestrial water storage (TWS) on the Tibetan Plateau (TP) is imperative to improve the assessment of water availability that are critical for similar to 2 billion people downstream. Through long-term sediment flux observations, here we find that sediment transport makes a substantial contribution to gravity satellite-derived TWS change in regions with a high erosion rate such as the TP, which has never been taken into consideration in previous studies. Neglecting this contribution leads to an overestimation of the TWS loss by about 10% on average for the seven headwater basins on the TP. The contribution is especially high in the Indus River and Yarkant River basins. Our findings improve the regional estimation of water availability and thus support climate adaptation and sustainable water resource management.
   For the first time, we quantify the contribution of sediment transport to gravity satellite-based estimation of TWS change on the TP Neglecting the contribution of sediment transport leads to an overestimation of the TWS loss by 10.1% on average The overestimated TWS loss is equivalent to the annual water demand of an additional 0.62 million people in surrounding nations
C1 [Qiao, Baojin; Li, Na; Li, Mengyao] Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Geosci & Technol, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Cui, Jiangpeng] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Tibetan Plateau Res, State Key Lab Tibetan Plateau Earth Syst & Resourc, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Dongfeng] Peking Univ, Minist Educ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Key Lab Water & Sediment Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Xiang, Longwei] Yangtze Univ, Sch Geosci, Wuhan, Peoples R China.
   [Borrelli, Pasquale] Roma Tre Univ, Dept Sci, Rome, Italy.
   [Borrelli, Pasquale] Univ Basel, Dept Environm Sci, Basel, Switzerland.
   [Famiglietti, Jay] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ USA.
C3 Zhengzhou University; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Tibetan
   Plateau Research, CAS; Peking University; Yangtze University; Roma Tre
   University; Italfarmaco; University of Basel; Arizona State University;
   Arizona State University-Tempe
RP Cui, JP (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Tibetan Plateau Res, State Key Lab Tibetan Plateau Earth Syst & Resourc, Beijing, Peoples R China.
EM cuijp@itpcas.ac.cn
RI Borrelli, Pasquale/AAF-6547-2019; Xiang, Longwei/AAH-2070-2020; Li,
   Dongfeng/M-5068-2019; Famiglietti, James/G-7383-2017
OI Cui, Jiangpeng/0000-0003-4587-541X; Li, Dongfeng/0000-0003-0119-5797
FU Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP)
   [2019QZKK0202]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [41901078]
FX This work is supported by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific
   Expedition and Research (STEP) (2019QZKK0202), and National Natural
   Science Foundation of China (41901078). We thank Maxime Mouyen for the
   helpful discussion on the use of GRACE data and sediment transport.
CR [Anonymous], 2023, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
   [Anonymous], 2019, Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate
   [Anonymous], 1994, Guide to Hydrological Practices: Data Acquisition and Processing Analysis, Forecasting and Other Applications, V5o
   Barkach JH, 2020, J HYDROL, V582, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124460
   Borrelli P, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P21994, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2001403117
   Borrelli P, 2017, NAT COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-02142-7
   Brun F, 2017, NAT GEOSCI, V10, P668, DOI [10.1038/NGEO2999, 10.1038/ngeo2999]
   Chang L, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P1250, DOI 10.1029/2018GL081652
   Cui J. P., 2023, SedimentfluxdataforeightheadwaterbasinsontheTibetanPlateau. Dataset, DOI [10.6084/m9.figshare.24646245.v1.Figshare, DOI 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.24646245.V1.FIGSHARE]
   Famiglietti JS, 2004, GEOPHYS MONOGR SER, V150, P197, DOI 10.1029/150GM16
   Hussain D, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P65327, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2984794
   Jacob T, 2012, NATURE, V482, P514, DOI 10.1038/nature10847
   Jiang C, 2017, ECOL ENG, V102, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.01.029
   Jiang Chong Jiang Chong, 2017, Research of Environmental Sciences, V30, P20
   Li DF, 2021, SCIENCE, V374, P599, DOI 10.1126/science.abi9649
   Li DF, 2021, WATER RESOUR RES, V57, DOI 10.1029/2020WR028193
   Li XY, 2022, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V12, P801, DOI 10.1038/s41558-022-01443-0
   Loomis BD, 2019, J GEODESY, V93, P1381, DOI 10.1007/s00190-019-01252-y
   Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China, Chinese River Sediment Bulletin
   Ministry of Water Resources of the PR China, Chinese hydrological data Yearbook
   Mouyen M, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-05921-y
   Nakaegawa T, 2012, HYDROL PROCESS, V26, P2470, DOI 10.1002/hyp.9392
   Qiao BJ, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V222, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.037
   Reager JT, 2016, SCIENCE, V351, P699, DOI 10.1126/science.aad8386
   Rodell M, 1999, WATER RESOUR RES, V35, P2705, DOI 10.1029/1999WR900141
   Rodell M, 2018, NATURE, V557, P650, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0123-1
   Rodell M, 2009, NATURE, V460, P999, DOI 10.1038/nature08238
   Save H, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V121, P7547, DOI 10.1002/2016JB013007
   Schnitzer S, 2013, GEOPHYS J INT, V193, P1283, DOI 10.1093/gji/ggt023
   Song CQ, 2015, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V124, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2014.11.001
   Tapley BD, 2004, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V31, DOI 10.1029/2004GL019920
   Tapley BD, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P358, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0456-2
   Wang JR, 2020, J HYDROL, V584, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124652
   Wiese DN., 2018, JPL GRACE Mascon Ocean, Ice, DOI DOI 10.5067/TEMSC-3MJC6
   Xiang LW, 2016, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V449, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.06.002
   Yang K, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V147, P149, DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-2127-5
   Yao TD, 2022, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V3, P618, DOI 10.1038/s43017-022-00299-4
   Yao TD, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P663, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1580, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1580]
   Yu GA, 2024, CHIN SCI B-CHIN, V69, P394, DOI 10.1360/TB-2023-0075
   Zhang F, 2022, INT SOIL WATER CONSE, V10, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.iswcr.2021.09.004
   Zhang GQ, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P5550, DOI 10.1002/2017GL073773
   Zhang T, 2022, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V3, P832, DOI 10.1038/s43017-022-00362-0
NR 42
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 13
U2 13
PU AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
PI WASHINGTON
PA 2000 FLORIDA AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20009 USA
SN 0094-8276
EI 1944-8007
J9 GEOPHYS RES LETT
JI Geophys. Res. Lett.
PD AUG 16
PY 2024
VL 51
IS 15
AR e2023GL107553
DI 10.1029/2023GL107553
PG 10
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology
GA A9S8X
UT WOS:001285874700001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Yao, XC
   Zhang, ZY
   Yuan, FH
   Song, CC
AF Yao, Xiaochen
   Zhang, Zhiyu
   Yuan, Fenghui
   Song, Changchun
TI The impact of global cropland irrigation on soil carbon dynamics
SO AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Irrigation water; Soil organic carbon; Soil respiration; Carbon dynamic;
   Meta-analysis
ID ORGANIC-CARBON; AGGREGATE STABILITY; WATER MANAGEMENT; C SEQUESTRATION;
   RESPIRATION; TILLAGE; TEMPERATURE; DECOMPOSITION; DEPLETION; MOISTURE
AB Irrigation can increase crop yields and could be a key climate adaptation strategy. At present, under the background of increasing food demand and continuous expansion of irrigation cropland, there still uncertainties about the soil carbon dynamics under the change of irrigation water volume and irrigated area in view of largescale spatial heterogeneity. Therefore, this paper uses space-for-time + meta-analysis and a two-step methodology based on the residual trend analysis to quantitatively analyze the relationship between soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil respiration (Rs) in response to fluctuations in irrigation water volume and irrigated land extents. Here we show that the irrigation water volume within 100-1000 mm had a negative impact on SOC, and the impact was correlated with the irrigation water volume. Different levels of irrigation water manifest distinct effects on SOC content across varying soil depths. When irrigation water quantities are less than 700 mm, the impact on SOC content in the 0-30 cm depth layer surpasses that in the 30-200 cm depth layer. Conversely, when irrigation water quantities equal or exceed 700 mm, this pattern is reversed. The overall impact of irrigation on SOC stock at a depth of 0-200 cm was -14.88 +/- 6.7%. Tillage, planting intensity, topography, and soil type within irrigated cropland all exert variable impacts on SOC content. Whether these influences are deleterious or beneficial hinges predominantly upon the balance between the augmentation of SOC stock due to heightened carbon inputs from crops and the reduction of SOC through alterations in microbial activity. MannKendall trend analysis showed that from 2000 to 2015, the overall Rs of cropland showed an increasing trend, with an increase rate of 3.67 g/m2/year. The increase of global Rs is mainly driven by climate change factors (temperature, precipitation and solar radiation), while the decrease of Rs in a small number of areas is mainly driven by management practices (fertilizer nitrogen, irrigation, and tillage). Our study further quantifies the impact of irrigation on soil carbon dynamics, thereby offering potential pathways and data support for the advancement of sustainable agriculture.
C1 [Yao, Xiaochen; Zhang, Zhiyu; Yuan, Fenghui; Song, Changchun] Chinese Acad Sci, Northeast Inst Geog & Agroecol, Key Lab Wetland Ecol & Environm, Changchun 130102, Peoples R China.
   [Song, Changchun] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Hydraul Engn, Dalian 116023, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Zhiyu] Jilin Normal Univ, 1301 Haifeng St, Siping 136000, Peoples R China.
   [Yao, Xiaochen] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
C3 Chinese Academy of Sciences; Northeast Institute of Geography &
   Agroecology, CAS; Dalian University of Technology; Jilin Normal
   University; Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy
   of Sciences, CAS
RP Song, CC (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Northeast Inst Geog & Agroecol, Key Lab Wetland Ecol & Environm, Changchun 130102, Peoples R China.
EM songcc@iga.ac.cn
RI Yuan, Fenghui/M-7424-2013
OI Yuan, Fenghui/0000-0003-1004-873X
FU National Natural Science Founda- tion of China [42220104009]
FX This study was supported by the National Natural Science Founda- tion of
   China (grant no. 42220104009) .
CR Acosta-Martínez V, 2007, APPL SOIL ECOL, V37, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.03.009
   Almagro M, 2017, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V246, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2017.05.016
   Amézketa E, 1999, J SUSTAIN AGR, V14, P83, DOI 10.1300/J064v14n02_08
   Balesdent J, 2000, SOIL TILL RES, V53, P215, DOI 10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00107-5
   Ball KR, 2023, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V187, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109189
   Bond-Lamberty B, 2010, NATURE, V464, P579, DOI 10.1038/nature08930
   Caviglia OP, 2011, AGRON J, V103, P1081, DOI 10.2134/agronj2011.0019
   Chen F, 2019, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V271, P336, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.03.021
   Chen P, 2022, AGR WATER MANAGE, V272, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107867
   Chen ZM, 2018, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V116, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.10.029
   Condron LM, 2014, EUR J SOIL SCI, V65, P741, DOI 10.1111/ejss.12164
   Cui XQ, 2021, NAT FOOD, V2, P886, DOI 10.1038/s43016-021-00384-9
   Dal Ferro N, 2023, GEODERMA, V432, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116398
   Emde D, 2021, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V27, P3898, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15680
   Feng ZY, 2021, AGR WATER MANAGE, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106830
   Friedlingstein P, 2022, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V14, P4811, DOI 10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022
   Garcia-Franco N., 2018, Soil Management and Climate Change, P349, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-812128-3.00023-9
   Ge WY, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V773, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145648
   Getaneh F., 2007, Influence of Small Scale Irrigation on Selected Soil Chemical Properties, P9
   Hao Y, 2002, SOIL TILL RES, V68, P133, DOI 10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00113-7
   Huang N, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abb8508
   Hunt JE, 2016, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V13, P2927, DOI 10.5194/bg-13-2927-2016
   Hursh A, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P2090, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13489
   Jabro JD, 2008, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V88, P1478, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.07.012
   Jägermeyr J, 2017, NAT COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1038/ncomms15900
   Jiao JG, 2018, AGR WATER MANAGE, V201, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.01.020
   Jobbágy EG, 2000, ECOL APPL, V10, P423, DOI 10.2307/2641104
   Kochsiek AE, 2009, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V149, P1983, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.07.004
   Koricheva J., 2013, Handbook of MetaAnalysis in Ecology and Evolution, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400846184
   Lal R, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P3285, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14054
   Li ZC, 2016, AGR WATER MANAGE, V172, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.04.009
   Liu AG, 2005, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V69, P2041, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2005.0032
   Liu XX, 2021, SCI DATA, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41597-021-01065-9
   Liu XZ, 2002, PLANT SOIL, V240, P213, DOI 10.1023/A:1015744126533
   Livsey J, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab2108
   McCulley RL, 2007, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V71, P820, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2006.0303
   McDermid S, 2023, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V4, P435, DOI 10.1038/s43017-023-00438-5
   McGill BM, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P5948, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14472
   Miller AE, 2005, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V37, P2195, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.03.021
   Minasny B, 2017, GEODERMA, V292, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.002
   Moebius-Clune B.N., 2016, COMPREHENSIVE ASSESS
   Mudge PL, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P945, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13448
   Mueller ND, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P317, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2825, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2825]
   Mueller ND, 2012, NATURE, V490, P254, DOI 10.1038/nature11420
   Novelli LE, 2017, SOIL TILL RES, V165, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2016.08.008
   Núñez A, 2023, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V347, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2023.108392
   ORCHARD VA, 1983, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V15, P447, DOI 10.1016/0038-0717(83)90010-X
   Ouyang W, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V533, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.109
   PICKETT S T A, 1989, P110
   Porwollik V, 2019, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V11, P823, DOI 10.5194/essd-11-823-2019
   Potapov P, 2022, NAT FOOD, V3, P19, DOI 10.1038/s43016-021-00429-z
   Potter P, 2010, EARTH INTERACT, V14, DOI 10.1175/2009EI288.1
   Roldán A, 2005, APPL SOIL ECOL, V30, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.01.004
   RUSSO D, 1988, WATER RESOUR RES, V24, P285, DOI 10.1029/WR024i002p00285
   Sapkota A, 2020, SOIL SYST, V4, DOI 10.3390/soilsystems4020020
   Scanlon BR, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P9320, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1200311109
   Schauberger B, 2017, NAT COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1038/ncomms13931
   Schmidt JE, 2018, AGR WATER MANAGE, V202, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.02.005
   Shaver TM, 2003, GEODERMA, V116, P149, DOI 10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00099-5
   Sinclair TR, 2020, CROP SCI, V60, P29, DOI 10.1002/csc2.20094
   Six J, 2000, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V32, P2099, DOI 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00179-6
   Sriphirom P, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V223, P980, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.212
   Tang SR, 2017, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V17, P1843, DOI 10.1007/s11368-016-1607-y
   Tautges NE, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P3753, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14762
   Tian Z, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V166, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105360
   United Nations, 2021, 2022 Revision of World Population Prospects
   Wang MM, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-33278-w
   Watson R. T., 2000, Land use, land-use change and forestry: A special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
   Wen Y, 2023, AGR WATER MANAGE, V287, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108435
   Xu M, 2001, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V15, P687, DOI 10.1029/2000GB001365
   Xu XR, 2020, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V20, P1173, DOI 10.1007/s11368-019-02557-3
   Xu YY, 2020, AGR WATER MANAGE, V239, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106237
   Yan LM, 2010, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V16, P2345, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02091.x
   Yang SH, 2017, PADDY WATER ENVIRON, V15, P787, DOI 10.1007/s10333-017-0591-1
   Yang Y, 2023, NAT FOOD, V4, P654, DOI 10.1038/s43016-023-00821-x
   Zhang J, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V840, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156469
   Zhang WH, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12081532
   Zhang X, 2021, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V13, P2753, DOI 10.5194/essd-13-2753-2021
   Zhong YQ, 2015, SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM, V91, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.08.030
   Zou JY, 2022, NAT GEOSCI, V15, P627, DOI 10.1038/s41561-022-00989-0
NR 80
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 29
U2 39
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0378-3774
EI 1873-2283
J9 AGR WATER MANAGE
JI Agric. Water Manage.
PD MAY 1
PY 2024
VL 296
AR 108806
DI 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108806
EA APR 2024
PG 10
WC Agronomy; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Water Resources
GA PQ0Z8
UT WOS:001215442300001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU MacLeod, D
   Kniveton, DR
   Todd, MC
AF MacLeod, David
   Kniveton, Dominic R.
   Todd, Martin C.
TI Playing the long game: Anticipatory action based on seasonal forecasts
SO CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate adaptation; Seasonal climate forecasting; Early warning;
   Forecast-based financing; Disaster risk reduction; Anticipatory action
ID CLIMATE INFORMATION; SUBSISTENCE FARMERS; DECISION-MAKING; PREDICTION;
   USABILITY; SYSTEMS
AB Acting in advance of floods, drought and cyclones often requires decision-makers to work with weather forecasts. The inherently probabilistic nature of these forecasts can be problematic when deciding whether to act or not. Cost-loss analysis has previously been employed to support forecast based decision-making such as Forecast-based Financing (FbF), providing insight to when an FbF system has 'potential economic value' relative to a no-forecast alternative. One well-known limitation of cost-loss analysis is the difficulty of estimating losses (which vary with hazard magnitude and extent, and with the dynamics of population vulnerability and exposure). A less-explored limitation is ignorance of the temporal dynamics (sequencing) of costs and losses. That is, even if the potential economic value of a forecast system is high, the stochastic nature of the atmosphere and the probabilistic nature of forecasts could conspire over the first few forecasts to increase the expense of using the system over the no-forecast alternative. Thus, for a forecast-based action system to demonstrate value, it often needs to be used over a prolonged length of time. However, knowing exactly how long it must be used to guarantee value is unquantified. This presents difficulties to institutions mandated to protect those at risk, who must justify the use of limited funds to act in advance of a potential, but not definite disaster, whilst planning multi-year strategies. Here we show how to determine the period over which decision makers must use forecasts in order to be confident of achieving 'value' over a no-forecast alternative. Results show that in the context of seasonal forecasting it is plausible that more than a decade may pass before a FbF system will have some certainty of showing value, and that if a particular user requires an almost-certain guarantee that using a forecast will be better than a no-forecast strategy, they must hold out until a near-perfect forecast system is available. The implication: there is potential value in seasonal forecasts, but to exploit it one must be prepared to play the long game.
C1 [MacLeod, David] Univ Bristol, Sch Geog Sci, Bristol, Avon, England.
   [Kniveton, Dominic R.] Univ Sussex, Sch Global Studies, Brighton, E Sussex, England.
   [Todd, Martin C.] Univ Sussex, Dept Geog, Brighton, E Sussex, England.
C3 University of Bristol; University of Sussex; University of Sussex
RP Kniveton, DR (corresponding author), Univ Sussex, Sch Global Studies, Brighton, E Sussex, England.
EM david.macleod@bristol.ac.uk; d.r.kniveton@sussex.ac.uk;
   m.todd@sussex.ac.uk
OI MacLeod, Dave/0000-0001-5504-6450; kniveton, dominic/0000-0002-8643-4277
FU Science for Humanitarian Emergencies and Resilience (SHEAR)
   [NE/P000673/1, NE/P000568/1, NE/P000428/1]; U.K. Natural Environment
   Research Council; Economic and Social Research Council; U.K. Department
   for International Development; European Union [869550]; NERC
   [NE/P000673/1] Funding Source: UKRI
FX This research was supported by the Science for Humanitarian Emergencies
   and Resilience (SHEAR) consortium project "Towards Forecast-based
   Preparedness Action" (ForPAc, www.forpac.org) , Grants NE/P000673/1,
   NE/P000568/1, and NE/P000428/1. The SHEAR programme is funded by the
   U.K. Natural Environment Research Council, the Economic and Social
   Research Council, and the U.K. Department for International Development.
   DM was also supported by funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020
   program through the DOWN2EARTH project (grant 869550) .
CR Bharwani S, 2005, PHILOS T R SOC B, V360, P2183, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2005.1742
   Cash DW, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P8086, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1231332100
   de Perez EC, 2016, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V20, P3549, DOI 10.5194/hess-20-3549-2016
   Hammer G, 2000, ATMOS OCEAN SCI LIB, V21, P183
   Hammer GL, 2001, AGR SYST, V70, P515, DOI 10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00058-0
   Hansen JW, 2011, EXP AGR, V47, P205, DOI 10.1017/S0014479710000876
   Hansen JW, 2009, AGR SYST, V101, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2009.03.005
   Hillier D., 2012, Oxfam Policy and Practice: Agriculture, Food and Land, V12, P1
   Johnson SJ, 2019, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V12, P1087, DOI 10.5194/gmd-12-1087-2019
   Kilavi M, 2018, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/atmos9120472
   Lemos MC, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P789, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1614, 10.1038/nclimate1614]
   Lopez A, 2017, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V9, P701, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0072.1
   MacLeod D, 2018, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V21, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2018.05.003
   MacLeod D, 2021, ATMOS SCI LETT, V22, DOI 10.1002/asl.1015
   Macleod D, 2019, J CLIMATE, V32, P7989, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0201.1
   MacLeod D, 2019, CLIM DYNAM, V53, P4505, DOI 10.1007/s00382-019-04800-6
   MURPHY AH, 1977, MON WEATHER REV, V105, P803, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1977)105<0803:TVOCCA>2.0.CO;2
   Ngugi R.K., 2002, CLIMATE FORECAST INF
   Patt A, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P12623, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0506125102
   Patt A, 2002, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V12, P185, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00013-4
   Patt AG, 2007, SCIENCE, V318, P49, DOI 10.1126/science.1147909
   Phillips JG, 2002, AGR SYST, V74, P351, DOI 10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00045-8
   Podestá G, 2002, AGR SYST, V74, P371, DOI 10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00046-X
   Rengalakshmi R, 2007, Climate Prediction and Agriculture: Advances and Challenges, P129, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-44650-7_13
   Richardson DS, 2000, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V126, P649, DOI 10.1002/qj.49712656313
   Roncoli C, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V92, P433, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9445-6
   Vellinga M, 2018, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V144, P861, DOI 10.1002/qj.3263
   Wilkinson E., 2018, Forecasting, hazards, averting disasters: Implementing forecast-based early action at scale
NR 28
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 1
U2 13
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0963
J9 CLIM RISK MANAG
JI CLIM. RISK MANAG.
PY 2021
VL 34
AR 100375
DI 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100375
EA NOV 2021
PG 11
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA XB1MA
UT WOS:000721097500001
OA Green Published, gold, Green Accepted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Ma, XF
   Zhao, CY
   Yan, W
   Zhao, XN
AF Ma, Xiaofei
   Zhao, Chengyi
   Yan, Wei
   Zhao, Xiaoning
TI Influences of 1.5 °C and 2.0 °C global warming scenarios on water use
   efficiency dynamics in the sandy areas of northern China
SO SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE WUE; 1.5 degrees C warming; 2.0 degrees C warming; Desertification;
   Northern China
ID NET PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY; TARIM RIVER-BASIN; BIOLOGICAL SOIL CRUSTS;
   CARBON-DIOXIDE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; COMBATING DESERTIFICATION; TERRESTRIAL
   ECOSYSTEMS; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; BINDING VEGETATION; TEMPORAL PATTERNS
AB Water use efficiency (WUE) is an important variable used in hydrometeorology study to reveal the links between carbon-water cycles in sandy ecosystems which are highly sensitive to climate change and can readily reflect the effects of it. In light of the Paris Agreement, it is essential to identify the regional impacts of 0.5 degrees C of additional global warming to inform climate adaptation and mitigation strategies. Using the modified Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach (CASA) and Advection-Aridity (AA) models with global warming values of 1.5 degrees C and 2.0 degrees C above preindustrial levels from Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2b) datasets, we conducted a new set of climate simulations to assess the effects of climate on WUE (the ratio of net primary productivity (NPP) to actual evapotranspiration (ETa)) in different sandy land types (mobile sandy land, MSL; semimobile/semifixed sandy land, SMSF; and fixed sandy land, FSL) during the period of baseline (1986-2005) and future (2006-2100). The spatiotemporal patterns of ETa, NPP, and WUE mostly showed increasing trends; the value of WUE decreased (6.40%) only in MSL with an additional 0.5 degrees C of warming. Meteorological and vegetation factors determined the variations in WUE. With warming, only the correlation between precipitation and WUE decreased in the three sandy land types, and the leaf area index (LAI) increased with an additional 0.5 degrees C of warming. The desertification degree comprehensively reflects the linkages among the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI), LAI and WUE. Simulation results indicated the sandy area extent could potential increase by 20 x 10(4) km(2) per decade on average during 2016-2047 and that the increase could be gradual (2.60 x 10(4) km(2) per decade) after 2050 (2050-2100). These results highlight the benefits of limiting the global mean temperature change to 1.5 degrees C above preindustrial levels and can help identify the risk of desertification with an additional 0.5 degrees C of warming. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Ma, Xiaofei; Zhao, Xiaoning] Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Inst Ecol & Geog, State Key Lab Desert & Oasis Ecol, Urumqi 830011, Peoples R China.
   [Zhao, Chengyi] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Land Sci Res Ctr, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
   [Ma, Xiaofei] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
   [Yan, Wei] Xinyang Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Xinyang 46400, Peoples R China.
C3 Chinese Academy of Sciences; Xinjiang Institute of Ecology & Geography,
   CAS; Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology; Chinese
   Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS;
   Xinyang Normal University
RP Zhao, CY (corresponding author), Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Land Sci Res Ctr, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
EM zhaocy@nuist.edu.cn
RI Yan, Wei/GPW-7906-2022; Ma, Xiaofei/ABB-5302-2022
OI Ma, Xiaofei/0000-0001-9456-0065
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41671030, U1403281];
   Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20181059]; National
   Basic Research Program of China [2013CB429903]; Thousand Young Talents
   Program, Chinese Academy of Sciences [Y772121]
FX National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Numbers:
   41671030, U1403281. The Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province,
   Grant/Award Number: BK20181059. The National Basic Research Program of
   China, Grant/Award Number: 2013CB429903. Thousand Young Talents Program,
   Chinese Academy of Sciences, Grant/Award Number: Y772121.
CR Andrews T., 2012, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V39, P6
   BALDOCCHI D, 1994, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V67, P291, DOI 10.1016/0168-1923(94)90008-6
   Battipaglia G, 2014, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V37, P382, DOI 10.1111/pce.12160
   Belnap J, 1998, J ARID ENVIRON, V39, P133, DOI 10.1006/jare.1998.0388
   BONAN GB, 1993, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V43, P303, DOI 10.1016/0034-4257(93)90072-6
   BRUTSAERT W, 1979, WATER RESOUR RES, V15, P443, DOI 10.1029/WR015i002p00443
   Carrer D, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aab650
   Church J.A., 2013, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
   Cox PM, 2013, NATURE, V494, P341, DOI 10.1038/nature11882
   Davies WJ, 2014, THEOR EXP PLANT PHYS, V26, P1, DOI 10.1007/s40626-014-0004-4
   Davin EL, 2007, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V34, DOI 10.1029/2007GL029678
   Dong CY, 2016, J ARID ENVIRON, V124, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.07.008
   Du H, 2018, GEODERMA, V330, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.038
   Duan ZH, 2001, ATMOS ENVIRON, V35, P5915, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00406-X
   Fawcett AA, 2015, SCIENCE, V350, P1168, DOI 10.1126/science.aad5761
   FIELD CB, 1995, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V51, P74, DOI 10.1016/0034-4257(94)00066-V
   FISCHER RA, 1978, ANNU REV PLANT PHYS, V29, P277, DOI 10.1146/annurev.pp.29.060178.001425
   Friedl MA, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016
   Frieler K, 2017, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V10, P4321, DOI 10.5194/gmd-10-4321-2017
   Fu YL, 2006, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V137, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.02.009
   Gang CC, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V67, P788, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.049
   Gao Y, 2014, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V195, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.04.010
   Grote EE, 2010, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V16, P2763, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02201.x
   Hao Chengyuan, 2006, Journal of Geographical Sciences, V16, P57
   Haque A., 2003, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, V62, P57, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10064-002-0170-5
   Hu GC, 2015, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V7, P3056, DOI 10.3390/rs70303056
   Hu ZM, 2008, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V14, P1609, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01582.x
   Huang L, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V601, P1097, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.084
   Huang MT, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P2366, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12873
   Huang XT, 2018, J ARID LAND, V10, P588, DOI 10.1007/s40333-018-0093-z
   Ito A, 2012, J HYDROMETEOROL, V13, P681, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-10-05034.1
   Jassal RS, 2009, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V149, P1168, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.02.004
   Jian DN, 2018, J HYDROMETEOROL, V19, P289, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0189.1
   Jiao L, 2018, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V424, P428, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.05.011
   Keenan TF, 2013, NATURE, V499, P324, DOI 10.1038/nature12291
   King AD, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P412, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3296, 10.1038/nclimate3296]
   Knapp PA, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P631, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02209.x
   Law BE, 2002, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V113, P97, DOI 10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00104-1
   Li J, 2007, J ARID ENVIRON, V71, P350, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.03.015
   Li XR, 2014, APPL SOIL ECOL, V78, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.02.009
   Li XR, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V83, P404, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.005
   Li XR, 2013, CHINESE SCI BULL, V58, P1483, DOI 10.1007/s11434-012-5662-5
   Li XC, 2013, QUATERN INT, V304, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.02.027
   Li XR, 2004, RESTOR ECOL, V12, P376, DOI 10.1111/j.1061-2971.2004.00313.x
   Li XR, 2004, J ARID ENVIRON, V57, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00089-2
   Li Z, 2016, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V20, P2169, DOI 10.5194/hess-20-2169-2016
   Liang W, 2015, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V204, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.01.015
   Liu D, 2018, J GEOGR SCI, V28, P611, DOI 10.1007/s11442-018-1494-9
   Liu Q. F., 2018, SUSTAIN FOR, V10, P19
   Liu Y. B., 2015, SCI REP, V5, P12
   Loveland TR, 1997, INT J REMOTE SENS, V18, P3291, DOI 10.1080/014311697217099
   Lu XL, 2010, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V114, P1924, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2010.04.001
   Luyssaert S, 2011, ECOL APPL, V21, P3272, DOI 10.1890/10-2395.1
   Ma XF, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V645, P1496, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.253
   Mu QZ, 2011, HYDROL PROCESS, V25, P4093, DOI 10.1002/hyp.8367
   Mu QZ, 2011, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V115, P1781, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019
   Muraoka H, 2010, J PLANT RES, V123, P563, DOI 10.1007/s10265-009-0270-4
   Nock CA, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P1049, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02222.x
   Pettorelli N, 2005, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V20, P503, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.011
   Piao SL, 2008, NATURE, V451, P49, DOI 10.1038/nature06444
   Piao SL, 2005, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V19, DOI 10.1029/2004GB002274
   Pinder RW, 2013, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V114, P25, DOI 10.1007/s10533-012-9787-z
   Ponton S, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P294, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01103.x
   POTTER CS, 1993, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V7, P811, DOI 10.1029/93GB02725
   Reid AJ, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V77, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.006
   Reynolds JF, 2007, SCIENCE, V316, P847, DOI 10.1126/science.1131634
   Sala OE, 2012, PHILOS T R SOC B, V367, P3135, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2011.0347
   Schaeffer M, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P867, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1584, 10.1038/nclimate1584]
   Shi W, 2018, HYDROL PROCESS, V32, P1363, DOI 10.1002/hyp.11493
   SINGH VP, 1993, STOCH HYDROL HYDRAUL, V7, P163, DOI 10.1007/BF01585596
   Stow D, 2003, INT J REMOTE SENS, V24, P1111, DOI 10.1080/0143116021000020144
   Su BD, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P10600, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1802129115
   Su BD, 2017, ATMOS RES, V196, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.06.015
   Sun Y, 2016, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V25, P311, DOI 10.1111/geb.12411
   Tan ZH, 2015, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V120, P464, DOI 10.1002/2014JD022535
   Tao H, 2014, INT J CLIMATOL, V34, P2678, DOI 10.1002/joc.3867
   Tao MH, 2017, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V122, P10329, DOI 10.1002/2017JD026976
   Thomey ML, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P1505, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02363.x
   Thomson AM, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P77, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4
   Tian HQ, 2011, ECOHYDROLOGY, V4, P322, DOI 10.1002/eco.216
   Tian HQ, 2010, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V259, P1311, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.009
   Tong XJ, 2009, J HYDROL, V374, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.030
   UNCCD, 1994, UN CONV COMB DES
   Vicente-Serrano SM, 2010, J CLIMATE, V23, P1696, DOI 10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1
   Wang F, 2013, LAND USE POLICY, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.07.010
   Wang HJ, 2012, METEOROL Z, V21, P279, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2012/0330
   Wang KC, 2012, REV GEOPHYS, V50, DOI 10.1029/2011RG000373
   Wang W, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P2437, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1436-5
   Wang XP, 2007, HYDROL PROCESS, V21, P72, DOI 10.1002/hyp.6185
   Wang X, 2007, PROC SPIE, V6279, DOI 10.1117/12.725431
   Warszawski L, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3228, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1312330110
   Wen-Quan Zhu, 2006, Journal of Forestry Research (Harbin), V17, P93, DOI 10.1007/s11676-006-0022-4
   Xiao ZQ, 2014, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V52, P209, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2237780
   Yang X, 2013, IET WIREL SENS SYST, V3, P119, DOI 10.1049/iet-wss.2012.0114
   Yao JQ, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V630, P444, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.200
   Yu GR, 2004, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V161, P303, DOI 10.1078/0176-1617-00972
   Yu GR, 2006, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V137, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.02.011
   Yu GR, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V177, P927, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02316.x
   Yu Z., 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, P10
   Zhang CL, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V627, P586, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.270
   Zhang FM, 2014, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V116, P359, DOI 10.1007/s00704-013-0949-2
   Zhang T, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V565, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.126
   Zhang Y, 2017, J SUSTAIN FOREST, V36, P568, DOI 10.1080/10549811.2017.1314971
   Zhang Z, 2013, TERR ATMOS OCEAN SCI, V24, P451, DOI 10.3319/TAO.2012.12.03.01(Hy)
   Zhang ZH, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V182, P765, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.233
   Zhao CY, 2004, J ARID ENVIRON, V56, P373, DOI 10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00040-5
   Zhao HL, 2011, GEODERMA, V160, P367, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.10.005
   Zheng H, 2017, J HYDROL, V551, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.056
   Zhou QL, 2013, ADV MATER RES-SWITZ, V726-731, P3818, DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.726-731.3818
   Zhu XJ, 2015, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V129, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.03.003
NR 110
TC 18
Z9 20
U1 5
U2 187
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0048-9697
EI 1879-1026
J9 SCI TOTAL ENVIRON
JI Sci. Total Environ.
PD MAY 10
PY 2019
VL 664
BP 161
EP 174
DI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.402
PG 14
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA HN5SQ
UT WOS:000460245600018
PM 30739851
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Arheimer, B
   Hjerdt, N
   Lindström, G
AF Arheimer, Berit
   Hjerdt, Niclas
   Lindstrom, Goran
TI Artificially Induced Floods to Manage Forest Habitats Under Climate
   Change
SO FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE environmental flow; river regulation; climate change; climate
   adaptation; biodiversity; water management; floodplains
ID MODEL; WATER; FRAGMENTATION; CONSEQUENCES; PREDICTIONS; BASINS
AB Global change is affecting agroforestry and its inherent ecosystems in Sweden. Here we examine the benefits of ecologically adjusted dam regulations to conserve biodiversity under climate change in floodplain habitats, including meadows and riparian mixed forests. The natural flood regime in snow-dominated regions has changed significantly during the last decades, in line with the projections for climate change. The ecosystems of temporary flooded forests show high biodiversity but are dependent on river high flows with long duration. These events are rare in the new climate scenario, but on the other hand, snow-fed rivers are also affected by hydropower dams and regulations. In this study we explored the potential of using reservoir regulation to artificially induce flood events; water management would then be a method to conserve biodiversity in forest habitats and adapt management to climate change. We made detailed calculations in lower Dalalven River, central Sweden, using observed time-series of river flow and dynamic scenario modeling for highly valuable Natura 2000 habitats. Here we show that long-term flooding is less frequent since extensive hydropower was introduced during the 1920s, and moreover, since the 1990's the spring floods are low due to low snow storage and short winter seasons. Sustainable management of 50% of the riparian forest requires flooding by 25 continuous days of 800 m(3) s(-1). We found that artificial floods using new ecological regulation regime of upstream hydropower reservoirs would help, but not be enough, to achieve this goal. The new regulation routines would correspond to a loss of 50-200 GWh in hydropower production for each artificial flood. Sustainable ecosystems in the study site do not request flooding every year, but some every fifth year. For practical implementation, the County Board is currently driving the process locally and we discuss the relevant social features, such as legal and funding aspects, of this adaptive management of water and forests. A smaller part of the forest could probably be rescued and costs could potentially be lowered by using only the most snow rich years and seasonal forecasting of river flow for optimal timing of water release from dams to induce flooding.
C1 [Arheimer, Berit; Hjerdt, Niclas; Lindstrom, Goran] Swedish Meteorol & Hydrol Inst, Norrkoping, Sweden.
C3 Swedish Meteorological & Hydrological Institute
RP Arheimer, B (corresponding author), Swedish Meteorol & Hydrol Inst, Norrkoping, Sweden.
EM Berit.Arheimer@smhi.se
OI Arheimer, Berit/0000-0001-8314-0735
CR Andersson E, 2000, REGUL RIVER, V16, P83, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(200001/02)16:1<83::AID-RRR567>3.0.CO;2-T
   Andréasson J, 2004, AMBIO, V33, P228, DOI 10.1579/0044-7447-33.4.228
   Antonson H, 2011, AGR FORESTRY SWEDEN
   Arheimer B, 2017, NAT COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-00092-8
   Arnal L, 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V22, P2057, DOI 10.5194/hess-22-2057-2018
   Barnett TP, 2005, NATURE, V438, P303, DOI 10.1038/nature04141
   Bergstrand M, 2014, HYDROL RES, V45, P349, DOI 10.2166/nh.2013.010
   Bunn SE, 2002, ENVIRON MANAGE, V30, P492, DOI 10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0
   Chow V. T., 1988, APPL HYDROLOGY MCGRA
   Elmhagen B, 2015, ECOL SOC, V20, DOI 10.5751/ES-07145-200123
   Falkenmark M, 2008, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V24, P201, DOI 10.1080/07900620701723570
   Godsey SE, 2014, HYDROL PROCESS, V28, P5048, DOI 10.1002/hyp.9943
   Grafton RQ, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P315, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1746, 10.1038/nclimate1746]
   Johansson B., 2002, Estimation of areal precipitation for hydrological modelling in Sweden
   Krasting JP, 2013, J CLIMATE, V26, P7813, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00832.1
   KSLA, 2015, FOR FOR SWED
   Laudon H, 2011, FORESTS, V2, P243, DOI 10.3390/f2010243
   Leira M, 2008, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V613, P171, DOI 10.1007/s10750-008-9465-2
   Lindström G, 2010, HYDROL RES, V41, P295, DOI 10.2166/nh.2010.007
   Lytle DA, 2004, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V19, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.002
   Molini A, 2011, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V38, DOI 10.1029/2010GL046477
   Nilsson C, 2005, SCIENCE, V308, P405, DOI 10.1126/science.1107887
   Nilsson P., 2016, SKOGSDATA 2016 AKTUE
   Palmer MA, 2008, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V6, P81, DOI 10.1890/060148
   Palmer MA, 2009, ENVIRON MANAGE, V44, P1053, DOI 10.1007/s00267-009-9329-1
   Rheinheimer DE, 2015, RIVER RES APPL, V31, P269, DOI 10.1002/rra.2749
   Samuelsson P, 2011, TELLUS A, V63, P4, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0870.2010.00478.x
   Strömqvist J, 2012, HYDROLOG SCI J, V57, P229, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2011.637497
   Yang W, 2010, HYDROL RES, V41, P211, DOI 10.2166/nh.2010.004
NR 34
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 0
U2 16
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-665X
J9 FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ
JI Front. Environ. Sci.
PD SEP 18
PY 2018
VL 6
AR 102
DI 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00102
PG 8
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA HD0AK
UT WOS:000452169600001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Picornell-Gelabert, L
   Servera-Vives, G
   Marco, YC
   Burjachs, F
   Currás, A
   Llergo, Y
   Dufraisse, A
   Arrillaga, MD
   Amezquita, MM
AF Picornell-Gelabert, Llorenc
   Servera-Vives, Gabriel
   Carrion Marco, Yolanda
   Burjachs, Francesc
   Curras, Andres
   Llergo, Yolanda
   Dufraisse, Alexa
   De Luis Arrillaga, Martin
   Mus Amezquita, Maurici
TI Late Holocene Aleppo pine<i> (Pinus</i><i> halepensis</i> Miller)
   woodlands in Mallorca (Balearic Islands, Western Mediterranean):
   Investigation of their distribution and the role of human management
   based on anthracological, dendro-anthracological and
   archaeopalynological data
SO QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE (Pinus halepensis Miller); Anthracology; Anthraco-typology;
   Archaeopalynology; Mallorca (Balearic island s )
ID POSTFIRE REGENERATION; LAND-USE; POLLEN; VEGETATION; PALYNOLOGY;
   PREHISTORY; IMPACT; FIRE
AB The pioneering nature of Mediterranean pines and their phytosociological role have been largely discussed in relation to different agents (e.g., edaphic, climatic or anthropogenic). In this context, Aleppo pine is one of the most widespread pine species in the Mediterranean basin, as it is especially adapted to climatic constraints, such as drought and high seasonality, and has a high tolerance for salinity and strong coastal winds. It is also well adapted to regeneration after anthropogenic landscape disturbances, highlighting its important after-fire regeneration rates. In this sense, phytosociological studies conducted in Mediterranean landscapes have found that this species' wide distribution is mostly due to its rapid regeneration after human landscape transformation, including fire, and the abandonment of agricultural lands. Aleppo pine is considered to broadly develop after human action in sclerophyllous formation, in which it would be scarce or absent without human intervention. Parallel, paleoenvironmental and archaeobotanical studies have attempted to trace these trends back to prehistoric times to investigate this species' role in Late Pleistocene and Holocene vegetation and evaluate the role of climate and human action in its diachronic dynamics. In this study, we present a compendium of anthracological, dendro-anthracological and archaeopalyonological data with the objective of (i) investigating the nature and distribution of Aleppo pine on the island of Mallorca and (ii) evaluating the possibility that human action could have resulted in the spread of this pine species during the first two millennia of permanent human occupation of the island (c. 2300 cal. BCE-1st-century ACE). Investigating these archaeobotanical datasets, as well as making comparisons with anthracological and paleoenvironmental studies in neighbouring Mediterranean zones (Iberia), allowed us to attest that Aleppo pine is a natural, pre-human component of the Holocene vegetation of the island, and it is especially well-adapted to coastal environments. Moreover, we describe the trends and characteristics of the human management of pine woodlands through anthracology and dendroanthracology, suggesting that human action did not provoke widespread growth of Aleppo pine in Mallorca at the expense of other vegetation types during prehistory. Such processes, well-documented by current phytosociological studies, probably began at some unknown point after the Romanisation of the island.
C1 [Picornell-Gelabert, Llorenc; Servera-Vives, Gabriel] Univ Balearic Isl, ArqueoUIB Res Team, Dept Hist Sci & Theory Arts, Carretera Valldemossa Km 7,5, Mallorca 07122, Spain.
   [Carrion Marco, Yolanda] Univ Valencia, Dept Prehistaria Arqueol & Hist Antiga, PREMEDOC GIUV2015 213, Av Blasco Ibanez 28, Valencia 46010, Spain.
   [Burjachs, Francesc] ICREA, Pg Lluis Co 23, Barcelona 08010, Spain.
   [Burjachs, Francesc] Inst Catala Paleoecol Humana & Evolucio Social IP, Zona Educ 4,Campus Sescelades URV Edifici W3, Tarragona 43007, Spain.
   [Burjachs, Francesc] Univ Rovira & Virgili, Dept Hist & Hist Art, Avinguda Catalunya 35, Tarragona 43002, Spain.
   [Curras, Andres] CSIC, Inst Heritage Sci Incipit, Av Vigo S-N, Santiago De Compostela 15705, Spain.
   [Llergo, Yolanda] Univ Barcelona, Dept Hist & Archaeol, Seminar Prehist Studies & Res, Montalegre 6, E-08001 Barcelona, Spain.
   [Dufraisse, Alexa] Sorbonne Univ, CNRS, UMR Archozool Arclieobot Soc Prat & Environm 7209, MNHN, CP56,55 Rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris, France.
   [De Luis Arrillaga, Martin] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Geog & Ordenac Terr IUCA, C Pedro Cerbuna 12, Zaragoza 50009, Spain.
   [Mus Amezquita, Maurici] Univ Balearic Isl, Dept Biol, Carretera Valldemossa Km 7,5, Palma De Mallorca 507122, Mallorca, Spain.
C3 Universitat de les Illes Balears; University of Valencia; ICREA;
   Universitat Rovira i Virgili; Catalan Institute of Human Paleo-Ecology &
   Social Evolution (IPHES); Universitat Rovira i Virgili; Consejo Superior
   de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC); CSIC - Instituto de Ciencias del
   Patrimonio (INCIPIT); University of Barcelona; Centre National de la
   Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle
   (MNHN); Sorbonne Universite; University of Zaragoza; Universitat de les
   Illes Balears
RP Picornell-Gelabert, L (corresponding author), Univ Balearic Isl, ArqueoUIB Res Team, Dept Hist Sci & Theory Arts, Carretera Valldemossa Km 7,5, Mallorca 07122, Spain.
EM tokelau24@gmail.com
RI Currás, Andrés/AAA-7752-2020; Burjachs, Francesc/G-2064-2015;
   Servera-Vives, Gabriel/B-3026-2016; Carrion Marco, Yolanda/I-3218-2017;
   Picornell Gelabert, Llorenc/B-3760-2016
OI Carrion Marco, Yolanda/0000-0003-4064-249X; Dufraisse,
   Alexa/0000-0002-2496-8644; Servera-Vives, Gabriel/0000-0002-2352-9236;
   Picornell Gelabert, Llorenc/0000-0003-0662-110X
FU Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
   [LPGIJCI201524550, GSVIJCI201630581]; Spanish Ministry of Economy,
   Industry and Competitiveness [HAR201567211P, PID2019-108692 GB-I00,
   HAR2017-83656P]; Direccio General de Innovacio i Recerca of the
   Government of the Balearic Islands [PRD2018/19]; Galician Innovation
   Agency (GAIN)
FX This study was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation
   and Universities (the work of LPGIJCI201524550and GSVIJCI201630581was
   founded by Juan de la CiervaIncorporacion fellowships) , the Spanish
   Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (projects
   HAR201567211P, PID2019-108692 GB-I00 and HAR2017-83656P) , and by the
   Direccio General de Innovacio i Recerca of the Government of the
   Balearic Islands (project PRD2018/19) . Andres Curras was funded by the
   Galician Innovation Agency (GAIN) . We are grateful to Alejandra Galmes
   (UIB) for drawing Fig. 1 and to the archaeologists responsible for
   excavating the studied sites and providing samples in support of
   archaeobotanical research.
CR Alcover JA, 2008, J WORLD PREHIST, V21, P19, DOI 10.1007/s10963-008-9010-2
   Allue E., 2013, ARKEOGAZTE, V3, P27
   Allué E, 2017, QUATERN INT, V457, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.10.024
   [Anonymous], 1987, VEGETACI ON ESPAN A
   [Anonymous], 2017, TECHNICAL REPORT
   [Anonymous], 1987, VEGETACION ESPANA
   [Anonymous], 2007, BRIT ARCHAEOLOGICAL
   [Anonymous], 2002, COMPLUTUM
   [Anonymous], 1978, TAPIZ VEGETAL PENINS
   [Anonymous], 1997, PAISAJE MEDITERRANEO
   Aramburu J., 2009, CAMPA NAS 2004 2005
   Aranbarri J, 2020, REV PALAEOBOT PALYNO, V279, DOI 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2020.104240
   Aura JE, 2005, VEG HIST ARCHAEOBOT, V14, P542, DOI 10.1007/s00334-005-0002-1
   Badal E., 1994, Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, V3, P155, DOI 10.1007/BF00202023
   Badal E., 1995, SAGUNTUM, V28, P29
   Badal E., 2013, CAMPAMENTO MESOL TIC, V45, P83
   Badal E., 1990, APORTACIONES ANTRACO
   Badal E., 1998, CULTURAS PLEISTOCENO, P287
   Barbero Marcel, 1998, P153
   Berbiela L., 2015, MONOGRAFIES SOCIETAT, V20, P467
   Beug H.-J., 2004, Leitfaden der Pollenbestimmung fur Mitte leuropa und angrenzende Gebiete
   Bol `os Oriol de, 1993, TREBALLS SOC CATALAN, V35, P17
   Bonet H., 2002, Serie de Trabajos Varios, V99
   Braun-Blanquet J, 1987, COMUNIDADES VEGETALE
   Burjachs F., 2005, MEMORIA EXCAVACIONES
   Burjachs F., 2000, ELS PRODUCTES ALIMEN, P31
   BURJACHS F., 2003, La recogida de muestras en Arqueobotanica: objectivos y propuestas metodologicas, P11
   Burjachs F., 1994, COLLECTIVE VOLUM TRA, P199
   C amara A., 2001, VEGETACI ON CAMBIO C, P37
   Calvo M., 2020, ARCHAEOLOGICAL ANRTH, V12, P247
   Calvo M., 2009, PYRENNAE, V40, P37
   Calvo M., 2002, INICIOS METALURGIA B
   [曹现勇 CAO Xianyong], 2007, [古生物学报, Acta Palaeontologica Sinica], V46, P411
   Carri on Marco Y., 2019, ANTHRACO2019 7 INT A, P55
   Carrión JS, 2010, REV PALAEOBOT PALYNO, V162, P458, DOI 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.12.007
   Carrión JS, 2009, J BIOGEOGR, V36, P2202, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02209.x
   Coubray S., 2019, PREHISTOIRE EUROPE N, V3, P139
   Daskalakou EN, 1996, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V6, P59, DOI 10.1071/WF9960059
   Dufraisse A, 2018, QUATERN INT, V463, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.03.065
   Ejarque A, 2011, REV PALAEOBOT PALYNO, V167, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2011.08.001
   Ensenyat J., 2002, BRIT ARCHAEOLOGICAL, V1095, P292
   Esteve M.A., 2007, RIESGOS AMBIENTALES, P1025
   ezel P., 1992, ET M EDITERRAN EENNE, V13, P158
   Faegri K., 1989, Textbook of Pollen Analysis by Knut Faegri and Johs. Iversen, V4th
   Fall PL, 2012, REV PALAEOBOT PALYNO, V185, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2012.08.002
   Florenzano A, 2013, ANN BOT-ITALY, V3, P173, DOI 10.4462/annbotrm-10248
   Florenzano A, 2012, GEOARCHAEOLOGY, V27, P34, DOI 10.1002/gea.21390
   Gil L., 2003, TRANSFORMACI ON HIST
   Girard M., 1969, Bulletin de l'AFEQ, V21, P275
   GOEURY C, 1979, Pollen et Spores, V21, P239
   Goubitz S, 2003, PLANT ECOL, V169, P195, DOI 10.1023/A:1026036332277
   Grau Almero E., 1990, DATOS ETNOBOT ANICOS
   Grove A.T., 2003, NATURE MEDITERRANEAN, V2nd
   Guerrero V., 2008, NUEVOS DATOS PRIMERA, P331
   HEIM J., 1970, Les relations entre les spectres polliniques recents et la vegetation actuelle en Europe occidentale
   Hern andez-Gasch J., 2020, 8 JORNADESARQUEOLOGI, P117
   IFN, 2012, MINISTERIO AGRICULTU
   Juggins S., 2007, SOFTWARE ECOLOGICAL, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.08.012
   Kaniewski D, 2020, ANTHROPOCENE, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.ancene.2020.100268
   Llergo Y., 2010, TECHNICAL REPORT, P21
   Llergo Y., 2010, TECHNICAL REPORT, P27
   Llergo Y., 2010, TECHNICAL REPORT, P16
   Llorenç PG, 2020, J ARCHAEOL SCI, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105265
   Llorens Ll, 2007, BASES INTERPRETACIO
   Lull V., 1999, IDEOLOGIA SOC PREHIS
   MARCO Y.CARRION., 2003, AFINIDADES DIFERENCI
   del Castillo EM, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9070416
   Mata C.y., 1983, 16 CONGRESO NACL ARQ, P249
   Mayor Soler Coords, 2015, VIVIR JUNTO TURIA HA, P62
   Men endez-Amor J., 1961, B R SOC ESP HIST NAT, V59, P97
   Mercuri AM, 2019, HOLOCENE, V29, P830, DOI 10.1177/0959683619826631
   Mercuri AM, 2012, VEG HIST ARCHAEOBOT, V21, P353, DOI 10.1007/s00334-012-0352-4
   Micó R, 2006, RADIOCARBON, V48, P421, DOI 10.1017/S0033822200038856
   Miras Yannick, 2009, Revue des Sciences Naturelles d'Auvergne, V73, P71
   Moore P.D., 1994, Pollen Analysis
   Ne'eman G, 2004, PLANT ECOL, V171, P69, DOI 10.1023/B:VEGE.0000029380.04821.99
   Ne'eman G, 1998, ECOGRAPHY, V21, P535, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00445.x
   Ne'eman G., 2000, Ecology, Biogeography and Management of Pinus halepensis and Pinus brutia Forest Ecosystems in the Mediterranean Basin
   o V.M., 2003, INTRODUCCI ON GEOGRA
   Oliver MG, 2018, TRABAJOS PREHIST, V75, P128, DOI 10.3989/tp.2018.12207
   P erez-Obiol R., 2000, COLONIZACI ON HUMANA, P73
   P erez-Obiol R., 2001, MONOGR SOC HIST NAT, V9, P69
   Parra I., 1994, QUANTIFICATION PRECI
   Pausas JG, 2004, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V203, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.061
   Pausas JG, 2003, PLANT ECOL, V169, P205, DOI 10.1023/A:1026019528443
   Pérez-Jordà G, 2018, VEG HIST ARCHAEOBOT, V27, P253, DOI 10.1007/s00334-017-0618-y
   Picornell-Gelabert Ll, 2012, PAISAJE VEGETAL SOCI
   Picornell-Gelabert L, 2021, ENVIRON ARCHAEOL, V26, P251, DOI 10.1080/14614103.2018.1521086
   Picornell-Gelabert L, 2017, QUATERN INT, V458, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.03.018
   Picornell-Gelabert L, 2017, QUATERN INT, V431, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.058
   Piqu e R., 2003, BRIT AARCHAEOLOGICAL, P322
   PUCHOL O.GARCIA., 2006, ABRIC FALGUERA ALCOI
   Punt W., 1976, Northwest European Pollen Flora
   Qu ezel P., 1990, ACTA BOT MALACIT, V15, P145
   Ramis D, 2018, J ISL COAST ARCHAEOL, V13, P265, DOI 10.1080/15564894.2017.1334721
   Räsänen S, 2007, REV PALAEOBOT PALYNO, V146, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2007.04.004
   Reille M., 1992, ATLAS PHOTOGRAPHIQUE
   Riera S, 2018, The Bioarchaeology of Ritual and Religion, P148
   Risch, 2004, CYPSELA, V15, P123
   Rivas Martinez S., 1987, ICONA
   Rivas-Martinez S, 1992, ITINERA GEOBOT, V6, P5
   Ros M.T., 1984, BRIT AARCHAEOLOGICAL, P136
   Roure Nolla J.M., 1995, FINAL REPORT CONTRAC
   Servera Vives G., 2018, 2018 IEEE INT WORKSH
   Servera-Vives G., 2016, INFORME ARQUEOPOL LI, P10
   Servera-Vives G., 2016, TECHNICAL REPORT
   Servera-Vives G., 2017, TECHNICAL REPORT, P9
   Servera-Vives G., 2019, PROMONTORIES FORTIFI, P63
   Servera-Vives G, 2018, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V498, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.02.015
   Sintes E., 2015, PREHIST ORIA LILLA
   Soler J.A., 1999, PRIMEROS RESULTADOS, P269
   Sureda-Negre J., 2011, APPL ENV ED COMMUN I, V10, P31
   Tapias R, 2004, PLANT ECOL, V171, P53, DOI 10.1023/B:VEGE.0000029383.72609.f0
   Thanos CA, 2000, ECOLOGY, BIOGEOGRAPHY AND MANAGEMENT OF PINUS HALEPENSIS AND P BRUTIA FOREST ECOSYSTEMS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN BASIN, P79
   van der Kaars S, 2001, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V171, P185, DOI 10.1016/S0031-0182(01)00245-0
   Vernet J. -L., 1987, PREMI ERES COMMUNAUT, P31
   Yll E, 1999, SAGUNTUM PLAV EXTRA, V2, P45
   Yll EI, 1997, QUATERNARY RES, V48, P339, DOI 10.1006/qres.1997.1925
   Yll R., 2010, INFORME 2010006PL TE
NR 119
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 0
U2 7
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 1040-6182
EI 1873-4553
J9 QUATERN INT
JI Quat. Int.
PD AUG 20
PY 2021
VL 593
BP 346
EP 363
DI 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.11.006
EA JUN 2021
PG 18
WC Geography, Physical; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Physical Geography; Geology
GA SS6KO
UT WOS:000661863600002
OA Green Submitted, Green Accepted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Badora, D
   Wawer, R
   Nieróbca, A
   Król-Badziak, A
   Kozyra, J
   Jurga, B
   Nowocien, E
AF Badora, Damian
   Wawer, Rafal
   Nierobca, Anna
   Krol-Badziak, Aleksandra
   Kozyra, Jerzy
   Jurga, Beata
   Nowocien, Eugeniusz
TI Simulating the Effects of Agricultural Adaptation Practices onto the
   Soil Water Content in Future Climate Using SWAT Model on Upland Bystra
   River Catchment
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE SWAT; SWAT-CUP; climate change; adaptation scenarios; soil water
   content; afforestation; no plowing; filter strips
ID CHANGE MITIGATION; PRECIPITATION; UNCERTAINTY; PROJECTIONS; CALIBRATION;
   HYDROLOGY; IMPACTS; POLAND
AB The article presents predicted changes in soil water content in the Bystra river catchment (eastern Poland) for various scenarios of climate change and adaptation practices obtained on the basis of a SWAT model simulation for three regional climate models driven by the global climate model EC-EARTH for the years 2041-2050 and the RCP 4.5 and 8.5 RCP scenarios. Climate scenarios were put against five adaptation scenarios presenting changes in land use and protective measures compared against a zero scenario of BaU (Business as Usual) kept in the future climate. Adaptation scenarios 1-5 are modifications of Scenario 0 (S-0). The 0-5 scenarios' analysis was based on comparing soil water content and total runoff, sediment yield, actual evapotranspiration. The first adaptation scenario (AS-1) assumes an increase in afforestation on soils from the agricultural suitability complex of soil 6-8 (semi-dry, permanent dry, semi-wet). The second adaptation scenario (AS-2) assumes the creation of a forested buffer for the Bystra River and its tributaries. The third adaptation scenario (AS-3) shows one of the erosion prevention practices, the so-called filter strips. The fourth adaptation scenario (AS-4) assumes the reduction in plowing on arable land. The fifth adaptation scenario (AS-5) involves increasing soil organic carbon to 2%. Simulations revealed that each of the adaptation scenarios 1, 2, 3, 5 does not generally contribute to increasing the water content in soil on BARL (spring crops), CANP (rape), WWHT (winter crops), CRDY (other crops) on arable lands (which together account for over 50% of the catchment area). However, they can contribute to the reduction in sediment yield, total runoff and changes in actual evapotranspiration. The adaptation scenario 4 (AS-4) shows a slight increase in the soil water content on Bystra catchment in the 2041-2050 perspective. Scenario 4 indicated a slight increase in total runoff and a decrease in sediment yield, which in combination with slightly higher water content reflects the protective role of plant residue mulch, lowering the evaporation from the bare soil surface during warm seasons. The no-till adaptation practice had the highest effect in positively affecting water balance at the catchment scale among the adaptation scenarios considered.
C1 [Badora, Damian; Wawer, Rafal; Nierobca, Anna; Krol-Badziak, Aleksandra; Kozyra, Jerzy; Jurga, Beata; Nowocien, Eugeniusz] Inst Soil Sci & Plant Cultivat, State Res Inst, Ul Czartoryskich 8, PL-24100 Pulawy, Poland.
C3 Institute of Soil Science & Plant Cultivation
RP Badora, D; Nieróbca, A (corresponding author), Inst Soil Sci & Plant Cultivat, State Res Inst, Ul Czartoryskich 8, PL-24100 Pulawy, Poland.
EM dbadora@gmail.com; huwer@iung.pulawy.pl; anna.nierobca@iung.pulawy.pl;
   aleksandra.krol@iung.pulawy.pl; kozyr@iung.pulawy.pl;
   bjurga@iung.pulawy.pl; nowocien@iung.pulawy.pl
RI Kozyra, Jerzy/T-9118-2019; Nieróbca, Anna/ABH-6299-2020
OI Badora, Damian/0000-0002-2497-8500; Nierobca, Anna/0000-0002-8627-0583;
   Krol-Badziak, Aleksandra/0000-0002-6680-6328; Wawer,
   Rafal/0000-0001-9266-9577
FU Polish Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development [DC2.0/2021];
   European commission
FX Research and ACP was funded by Polish Ministry of Agriculture and Rural
   Development, DC2.0/2021 Programme and B-Ferst project funded by the
   European commission.
CR Abbaspour KC, 2015, J HYDROL, V524, P733, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.027
   Abbaspour KC, 2007, MODSIM 2007: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION, P1603
   Abbaspour K.C, 2020, SWAT CUP TUTORIAL 2
   Abbaspour K.C., 2015, SWAT-CUP 2012: SWAT calibration and uncertainty programs-a user manual
   Abbaspour KC, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10010006
   [Anonymous], GUIDANCE EURO CORDEX
   [Anonymous], 2013, SYST MON SUSZ ROLN
   [Anonymous], 2021, REPORT CONDITION FOR
   [Anonymous], ZALATWIAJ SPRAWY URZ
   [Anonymous], 2020, QUANT GIS 3 10 13 CO
   [Anonymous], 2017, KRAJ PROGR OCZ SCIEK
   Arabi M, 2008, HYDROL PROCESS, V22, P3042, DOI 10.1002/hyp.6890
   Arnold JG, 1998, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V34, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
   Arnold JG., 2012, SOIL WATER ASSESSMEN
   Babel MS, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13192767
   Badora D, 2022, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/agriculture12030403
   Bajkiewicz-Grabowska E., 2022, HYDROLOGIA OGOLNA RE
   Bedkowska H., 2016, LASY ZMIANY KLIMATU
   Bilondi M.P., 2013, MIDDLE-EAST J SCI RE, V15, P1255
   Bogusz A., 2016, MONOGRAFIE KOMITETU
   Borecki T., 2021, 73 ZMIANY KLIMATU IC, P68
   Busari MA, 2015, INT SOIL WATER CONSE, V3, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.05.002
   Chalubinska A., 1954, PRZEWODNIK OG LNOPOL, P3
   CLC, 2018, CORINE LAND COV CLC
   CODGiK, 2013, CENTR OSR DOK GEOD K
   Crowther TW, 2015, NATURE, V525, P201, DOI 10.1038/nature14967
   Dembek W., 2016, INNOWACYJNE METODY G
   Derpsch Rolf, 2010, International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, V3, P1, DOI 10.3965/j.issn.1934-6344.2010.01.001-025
   Doroszewski A., 2012, WODA SR OBSZ WIEJ, V12, P78
   Doroszewski A., 2014, Agricultural drought in Poland in 1961-2010, P144
   Doroszewski A, 2016, LECT SUSZA ROLNICZA
   Geoportal, 2020, INST ODP GLOWN URZ G
   Havrylenko SB, 2016, CATENA, V137, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2015.10.001
   Hawes Ellen., 2005, RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE
   Humphrey V, 2018, NATURE, V560, P628, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0424-4
   IMGW, 2019, Instytut Meteorologii i Gospodarki Wodnej PIB
   IUNG-PIB, 2013, Ocena Retencji Wody w Glebie i Zagrozenia Susza w Oparciu o Bilans Wodny dla Obszaru Wojewodztwa Dolnoslaskiego
   IUNG-PIB, 2010, DIG SOIL AGR MAPS 1
   Jablonska E, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12030629
   Jacob D, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P563, DOI 10.1007/s10113-013-0499-2
   Jacobs C., 2019, EEA REPORT NO 4
   Jadczyszyn J., 2017, Studia i Raporty IUNG-PIB, V51, P9
   Jahn A., 1956, WYZYNA LUBELSKA RZEZ
   Jozefaciuk A., 2014, EROZJA GLEB POLSCE S, V44, P263
   Jurga B., 2018, ZLEWNIA RZEKI BYSTRE, P143
   Kalarus K., 2009, WPLYW MAT MACIERZYST
   KALISZEWSKI A., 2016, STUDIES MAT CEPL ROG, V49B, P7
   Kaliszewski A., 2016, STUDIA MAT CEPL ROGO, V49, P7
   Khan NU, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132413753
   KLIMADA 2.0, 2019, KLIMADA 2 0 BAZ WIED
   Kouchi DH, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9060384
   Kovats RS, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1267
   Kozyra J., 2019, ZMIANY KLIMATU ROLNI, P59
   Kujawa A., 2019, ZADRZEWIENIA OBSZARA
   Kundzewicz Z, 2012, STUD BAS, V29, P9
   Kundzewicz Z.W., 2011, Pol. J. Agron, V7, P68
   Kundzewicz ZW, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P173
   Kundzewicz ZW, 2018, ACTA GEOPHYS, V66, P1509, DOI 10.1007/s11600-018-0220-4
   Kundzewicz ZW, 2012, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V3, P297, DOI 10.1002/wcc.175
   Kus J., 2015, Studia i Raporty IUNG-PIB, V45, P27, DOI [DOI 10.26114/SIR.IUNG.2015.45.02, 10.26114/sir.iung.2015.45.02]
   Lambor J., 1965, PODSTAWY ZASADY GOSP
   Landelius T, 2016, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V142, P2132, DOI 10.1002/qj.2813
   Lasy Regionu, 2021, REG DYR LAS PANSTW L
   Mackey B, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P552, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1804
   Marcinkowski P, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9030156
   Markowski K., 2020, ROLNICTWO WOJEWODZTW
   Maruszczak H., 2000, Przeglad Geologiczny, V48, P580
   Mayer P.M., 2005, RIPARIAN BUFFER WIDT
   Meinshausen M, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P213, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z
   Moss RH, 2010, NATURE, V463, P747, DOI 10.1038/nature08823
   MPHP, 2017, KOMP MAP PODZ HYDR P
   Neitsch S.L., 2011, Soil Water Assessment Tool - Theoretical Documentation - Version 2009Rep, P406
   Neitsch SL., 2009, SOIL WATER ASSESSMEN, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2015.11.063, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.063]
   Nierobca A., 2013, Woda Srodowisko Obszary Wiejskie, V13, P81
   OSM, 2018, US
   OzgaZielinska M., 1997, Hydrologia stosowana (Applied hydrology)
   Pawlaczyk P., 2020, HDB GOOD PRACTICE SU
   PIEST RF, 1979, T ASAE, V22, P822, DOI 10.13031/2013.35108
   PIK, 2012, POTSD I CLIM IMP RES
   Piniewski M, 2017, HYDROLOG SCI J, V62, P1266, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2017.1321842
   Podolski B., 1999, PAM PU, V119, P101
   Sadurska E., 1980, CHARAKTERYSTYKA FIZY, P29
   Schulzweida U., 2006, Clim. Data Oper. Version
   Smarzynska K., 2016, Journal of Water and Land Development, P31
   SMGP Szczegolowa Mapa Geologiczna Polski, 2006, SZCZEG MAP GEOL POLS
   Somasundaram J, 2020, CRIT REV PLANT SCI, V39, P236, DOI 10.1080/07352689.2020.1782069
   Somorowska U, 2017, GEOGR POL, V90, P53, DOI 10.7163/GPol.0078
   Srodowiska Ministerstwo, 2013, STRAT PLAN AD DLA SE
   Summary for Policymakers, 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001, P2
   Talalaj Z, 1997, MAT KONF P OCK, V72, P91
   The Woodland Trust, 2016, KEEP RIV COOL GUID M
   Thomson AM, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P77, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4
   Trabucco A, 2008, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V126, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.015
   USDA United States Department of Agriculture, 1996, US
   Waidler D., 2011, CONSERVATION PRACTIC
   Wang YQ, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10030468
   Wawer R., 2008, Przeglad Naukowy - Inzynieria i Ksztaltowanie Srodowiska, V17, P20
   Wawer R., 2015, C PROBLEMY GOSPODARO
   Wawer R., 2021, TOP AGRAR, V5, P104
   Winchell M., 2012, SWAT EDITOR SWAT2012, P1
   Woch F., 2006, KOMPLEKSOWE SCALANIE
   Woch F., 2008, STUDIA RAP IUNG PIB, V10, P79, DOI [10.26114/sir.iung.2008.10.05, DOI 10.26114/SIR.IUNG.2008.10.05]
   Woch F., 2018, POL J AGRON, V33, P16
   Yang W, 2010, HYDROL RES, V41, P211, DOI 10.2166/nh.2010.004
   Zhang FY, 2011, AFR J BIOTECHNOL, V10, P17645, DOI 10.5897/AJB10.1163
   Zhao FB, 2021, CARBON BAL MANAGE, V16, DOI 10.1186/s13021-021-00187-2
   Ziemnicki S., 1977, ZESZ PROBL POST P W, V193, P44
NR 107
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 1
U2 16
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD AUG
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 15
AR 2288
DI 10.3390/w14152288
PG 25
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA 3R5ZO
UT WOS:000838990700001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Ashworth, P
   Sun, Y
   Ferguson, M
   Witt, K
   She, SX
AF Ashworth, Peta
   Sun, Yan
   Ferguson, Michele
   Witt, Katherine
   She, Shengxiang
TI Comparing how the public perceive CCS across Australia and China
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL
LA English
DT Article; Proceedings Paper
CT 14th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies
   (GHGT)
CY OCT 21-25, 2018
CL Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
DE Carbon capture and storage; Public attitudes; Surveys; Support; Risks;
   Benefits
ID CARBON CAPTURE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; STORAGE CCS; PERCEPTION; TRUST
AB Whilst carbon capture and storage (CCS) has been promoted as a direct countermeasure against global warming, there remains much debate about what its final role as a climate change mitigation strategy will be. One key criticism directed towards CCS has been its inability to gain public support. This study compares public attitudes to the range of low carbon energy sources and technologies across Australia and China, and is the first study to compare primary data across these two countries on this topic. An online survey encompassing a broad set of questions was used to identify the factors that are associated with support for CCS compared to other energy technologies. Data were collected from a nationally representative Australian sample (n= 2383) and from Chinese urban residents across six regions (n= 1266). The survey confirmed low levels of knowledge and support for CCS in both countries. However, male respondents, those who perceived themselves to have higher knowledge of CCS, and those who valued economic outcomes over environmental protection were more likely to support CCS - as long as the risks were not perceived to outweigh the benefits. The results found that for Australians who believed in human-induced climate change they were likely to be unsupportive of CCS. This opposition appears to be linked to no tolerance for extending fossil fuels as in our factor analysis CCS was aligned to fossil fuels in Australia. In both countries, support for renewable energy technologies remains strong. Given the International Energy Agency's future energy demand projections, combined with slow progress towards meeting the Paris Climate Agreement, the lack of knowledge and support for CCS is concerning. While there have been some technological advances, without parallel improvements in public acceptance of CCS, it will be difficult to see any commercial projects going forward in the near future. Although, the Chinese government's success in educating on climate science, as evidenced in these results, suggests that they may be more effective at informing the public of the benefits of CCS and take the lead on its deployment for climate change mitigation. Based on the latest climate models, it is almost crunch time for governments to decide if CCS has a role to play as part of an energy transition to a low carbon future or perhaps it may be time to turn their focus to climate adaptation.
C1 [Ashworth, Peta; Ferguson, Michele; Witt, Katherine] Univ Queensland, Sch Chem Engn, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.
   [Sun, Yan] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
   [She, Shengxiang] Guizhou Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Business Adm, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, Peoples R China.
C3 University of Queensland; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of
   Psychology, CAS; Guizhou University of Finance & Economics
RP Ashworth, P (corresponding author), Univ Queensland, Sch Chem Engn, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.; Sun, Y (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
EM p.ashworth@uq.edu.au
RI she, shengxiang/IZP-9694-2023; Ashworth, Peta/AAC-7378-2019; Ashworth,
   Peta/I-6503-2013
OI Ashworth, Peta/0000-0003-4648-7531; she, shengxiang/0000-0002-7975-116X;
   Witt, Katherine/0000-0002-5580-0246
FU Australian government under the Carbon Capture and Storage Research
   Development & Demonstration (CCS RDD) Fund; Australian Coal Association
   Low Emissions Technology Pty Ltd (ACALET); National Social Science
   Foundation of China [18BGL180]; Beijing Natural Science Foundation
   [9162017]
FX The UQ-SDAAP project is funded by the Australian government under the
   Carbon Capture and Storage Research Development & Demonstration (CCS
   RD&D) Fund (<SUP>~</SUP>AUDS.6 million). The project is also funded by
   the Australian Coal Association Low Emissions Technology Pty Ltd
   (ACALET) (<SUP>~</SUP>AUDS. 5 million). The University of Queensland
   (UQ) has contributed $0.5 million.The China research is also funded by
   the National Social Science Foundation of China (18BGL180) and by
   Beijing Natural Science Foundation [9162017].
CR ACCC, 2018, Restoring Electricity Affordability and Australia's Competitive Advantage
   AJZEN I, 1991, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V50, P179, DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   [Anonymous], 2017, Tracking Clean Energy Progress 2017: Energy Thecnology Perspective 2017 Excerpt Informing Energy Sector Transformations
   Ashworth P, 2015, INT J GREENH GAS CON, V40, P449, DOI 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.002
   Ashworth P, 2013, ENRGY PROCED, V37, P7410, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.683
   Ashworth P, 2012, INT J GREENH GAS CON, V9, P402, DOI 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.04.012
   Brunsting S, 2011, INT J GREENH GAS CON, V5, P1651, DOI 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.09.012
   Chen ZA, 2015, APPL ENERG, V158, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.046
   Cherry TL, 2014, ENERG POLICY, V68, P562, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.018
   China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), 2018, INDUSTRIAL CCS EOR I
   Chinese Ministry of Education (MOE), 2017, NUMBER OF FEMALE STU
   de Best-Waldhober M, 2009, ENRGY PROCED, V1, P4795, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.306
   Dowd AM, 2014, INT J GREENH GAS CON, V28, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.06.009
   Duan HX, 2010, ENERG POLICY, V38, P5281, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.040
   Hobman EV, 2013, ENERG POLICY, V63, P862, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.011
   Huijts NMA, 2014, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V38, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.008
   Huijts NMA, 2012, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V16, P525, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.018
   Huijts NMA, 2007, ENERG POLICY, V35, P2780, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.007
   International Energy Agency (IEA), 2016, 20 YEARS OF CARBON C
   Itaoka K, 2014, ENRGY PROCED, V63, P7133, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.749
   Jeanneret T., 2014, ENERGY TECHNOLOGY PR
   Koot C, 2016, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V46, P627, DOI 10.1111/jasp.12391
   Li Q, 2014, ENRGY PROCED, V63, P7019, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.735
   Liang X, 2011, APPL ENERG, V88, P1873, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.10.034
   Nisa C., 2018, REPORT TO THE AUSTRA
   Reiner D. M., 2014, WRITTEN TESTIMONY CA
   Schwartz S.H., 1977, ADV EXPT SOCIAL PSYC, V10, P221, DOI [10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5]
   Schwartz S.H., 1981, Altruism and helping behavior, P189
   Seigo SL, 2014, INT J GREENH GAS CON, V25, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.03.007
   Sharp JD, 2009, INT J GREENH GAS CON, V3, P641, DOI 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.04.001
   SLOVIC P, 1987, SCIENCE, V236, P280, DOI 10.1126/science.3563507
   Smith C., 2014, ASME SERAD 1 QUARTER, P2
   Steg L, 2005, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V25, P415, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003
   Ter Mors E, 2010, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V30, P347, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.06.001
   Terwel BW, 2012, INT J GREENH GAS CON, V9, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.02.017
   Terwel BW, 2009, ENRGY PROCED, V1, P4613, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.282
   Yan T., 2008, Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods, V2, P520
   Yang L, 2016, ENERGY, V96, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.044
   Yoo B, 2011, J INT CONSUM MARK, V23, P193, DOI 10.1080/08961530.2011.578059
NR 39
TC 22
Z9 23
U1 2
U2 31
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1750-5836
EI 1878-0148
J9 INT J GREENH GAS CON
JI Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control
PD JUL
PY 2019
VL 86
BP 125
EP 133
DI 10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.04.008
PG 9
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Energy & Fuels; Engineering,
   Environmental; Engineering, Chemical
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI); Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Energy & Fuels; Engineering
GA IC3OX
UT WOS:000470871800012
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Okey, TA
   Agbayani, S
   Alidina, HM
AF Okey, Thomas A.
   Agbayani, Selina
   Alidina, Hussein M.
TI Mapping ecological vulnerability to recent climate change in Canada's
   Pacific marine ecosystems
SO OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Ecological vulnerability; Cumulative impacts; Climate change; Marine
   ecosystems; Risk; Exposure; Sensitivity; Adaptive capacity; Resilience;
   Ecological indicators; Vulnerability mapping
ID CHANGE IMPACTS; DISTURBANCE; RESILIENCE; INDICATORS; HYPOXIA;
   COMPETITION; COMMUNITY; FRAMEWORK; CAPACITY; RANKING
AB Much knowledge is emerging about the past and potential effects of climate change on the unique and complex marine ecosystems of Canada's Pacific, including variations in the resilience, sensitivities, responsiveness, and non-stationarity of the biota. Such knowledge, however, is rarely synthesized or summarized with any overall integrated analyses that could guide the development of proactive planning for the effects of climate change. Regional and local planning of climate adaptation strategies, for example, requires an examination of ecological sensitivities and vulnerabilities at relevant spatial resolutions. We developed an illustrative example of a habitat-based ecological vulnerability assessment for the whole of Canada's Pacific marine area using existing spatial information from this region and from the California Current ecosystem. Potential climate impacts were calculated as the product of estimated exposure (E) of habitats to multiple dimensions of changing climate variables and expert-derived sensitivity (S) ratings of those habitats to changes in those climate variables. Vulnerability was then derived as the product of the estimated potential climate impacts in a location and the estimated cumulative impacts (Cl) of non-climate stressors there, which we considered to be an inverse proxy of the adaptive capacity (AC) of the biota in those habitats. We found considerable spatial variability of potential climate impacts and vulnerability on the scales of the 12 Ecosections of Canada's Pacific, 25 habitat categories, and at finer scales. We produced maps of ecological vulnerability to climate change as an example output for use in spatially-oriented adaptation planning. Our initial assessment indicated that the Strait of Georgia in particular followed by Queen Charlotte Strait, Juan de Fuca Strait, Vancouver Island Shelf, and Johnstone Strait have relatively high vulnerabilities to climate change, in part due to concentrations of local stressors there. On a coast wide basis the habitats that were indicated as most vulnerable are shallow rocky reefs, seagrass habitats, kelp habitats, and deep rocky reefs. This approach for mapping vulnerability to climate change could be improved with finer scale climate data, additional climate variables, and stressor-habitat sensitivity estimates derived specifically for this system. We provide a stepwise manual for policy-makers, managers, or other practitioners to map ecological vulnerability to climate change in other marine settings. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Okey, Thomas A.] Univ Victoria, Sch Environm Studies, STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.
   [Okey, Thomas A.] Ocean Integr Res, Victoria, BC V8V 2A4, Canada.
   [Agbayani, Selina; Alidina, Hussein M.] WWF Canada, Vancouver, BC V6C 1T2, Canada.
C3 University of Victoria; World Wildlife Fund
RP Okey, TA (corresponding author), Univ Victoria, Sch Environm Studies, STN CSC, POB 1700, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.
EM Thomas.Okey@gmail.com; sagbayani@wwfcanada.org; halidina@wwfcanada.org
FU Tides Canada Foundation; Pew Fellows Program in Marine Conservation of
   the Pew Charitable Trusts; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
FX We thank Natalie Ban and Karen Hunter, the editor of Ocean and Coastal
   Management, and two anonymous reviewers, all of whom provided helpful
   suggestions that improved the manuscript. We thank and acknowledge the
   Pew Fellows Program in Marine Conservation of the Pew Charitable Trusts
   and the Tides Canada Foundation for supporting the contributions of TAO.
   We also acknowledge CPAWS-BC as a partner in the background report and
   the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation for the support that led to this
   work.
CR Ainsworth C., 2002, U BRIT COLUMBIA FISH, V10, P1
   Ainsworth CH, 2008, ECOL MODEL, V216, P354, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.05.005
   Ainsworth CH, 2011, ICES J MAR SCI, V68, P1217, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsr043
   Allison EH, 2009, FISH FISH, V10, P173, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00310.x
   [Anonymous], 2000, EC IND NAT
   [Anonymous], 2005, Climate Change Risk and Vulnerability
   [Anonymous], 1995, Climate Change 1995: The IPCC Second Assessment Report Scientific-Technical Analyses of Impacts, Adaptations, and Mitigation of Climate Change Contribution of Working Group II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, forming part of the IPCC Seco
   [Anonymous], BRIT COL MAR EC CLAS
   [Anonymous], 2013, PLOS ONE
   [Anonymous], 2012, 2012 report card
   Ban NC, 2010, MAR POLICY, V34, P876, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.01.010
   Ban SS, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P681, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12453
   Belgrano A, 2013, SCIENCE, V342, P1176, DOI 10.1126/science.1245490
   Bernhardt JR, 2013, ANNU REV MAR SCI, V5, P371, DOI 10.1146/annurev-marine-121211-172411
   Bowen RE, 2003, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V46, P299, DOI 10.1016/S0964-5691(03)00008-5
   Brundtland GH, 1997, SCIENCE, V277, P457, DOI 10.1126/science.277.5325.457
   Christian J.R., 2013, 3032 DEP FISH OC, P127
   Cinner JE, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.018
   Cinner JE, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0074321
   Coll M, 2010, ICES J MAR SCI, V67, P769, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsp261
   Costanza R., 1992, ECOSYSTEM HLTH NEW G, V2, P378, DOI 10.1016/0925-8574(93)90006-2
   DAYTON PK, 1971, ECOL MONOGR, V41, P351, DOI 10.2307/1948498
   de Jonge V.N., 2003, Proceedings of 10th International Wadden Sea Symposium, P247
   de Jonge VN, 2007, MAR POLLUT BULL, V55, P407, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.09.014
   de Jonge VN, 2012, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V68, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.05.017
   de Jonge VN, 2006, MAR POLLUT BULL, V53, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.11.026
   DFO, 2013, RISK BAS ASS CLIM CH, P016
   Doney SC, 2012, ANNU REV MAR SCI, V4, P11, DOI 10.1146/annurev-marine-041911-111611
   Elfes CT, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0092589
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Frost M., 2013, MARINE CLIMATE CHANG, P12
   Fuentes MMPB, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P140, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02192.x
   Gaichas S., 2014, ICES J MAR SCI
   Guinotte JM, 2003, CORAL REEFS, V22, P551, DOI 10.1007/s00338-003-0331-4
   Halpern BS, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P948, DOI 10.1126/science.1149345
   Halpern BS, 2007, CONSERV BIOL, V21, P1301, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00752.x
   Halpern BS, 2012, NATURE, V488, P615, DOI 10.1038/nature11397
   Halpern BS, 2009, CONSERV LETT, V2, P138, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00058.x
   Harley CDG, 2006, ECOL LETT, V9, P228, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00871.x
   Hobday AJ, 2011, FISH RES, V108, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2011.01.013
   Hobday A J., 2006, Impacts of climate change on Australian marine life: Report to the Australian Greenhouse Office
   Hoegh-Guldberg O, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1655
   Hofmann GE, 2010, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V41, P127, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120227
   Hollowed AB, 2013, ICES J MAR SCI, V70, P1023, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fst081
   Howard J, 2013, OCEANOGR MAR BIOL, V51, P71
   Hunter K. L., 2014, CANADIAN MANUSCRIPT, V3036, P87
   HUTCHINSON GE, 1957, COLD SPRING HARB SYM, V22, P415, DOI 10.1101/SQB.1957.022.01.039
   JOCI, 2007, US OC POL REP CARD
   Jorgensen S.E., 2010, Handbook of ecological indicators for assessment of ecosystem health
   Kershner J, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025248
   Levin LA, 2009, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V6, P2063, DOI 10.5194/bg-6-2063-2009
   Marshall N, 2013, ECOSYSTEMS, V16, P797, DOI 10.1007/s10021-013-9651-6
   McCarthy J.J., 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE IMPAC
   McKenzie D.H., 1992, Ecological indicators, V1 and
   Meier HEM, 2012, AMBIO, V41, P558, DOI 10.1007/s13280-012-0320-3
   Melnychuk MC, 2014, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V24, P561, DOI 10.1007/s11160-013-9307-9
   MENGE BA, 1987, AM NAT, V130, P730, DOI 10.1086/284741
   Mumby PJ, 2014, CONSERV LETT, V7, P176, DOI 10.1111/conl.12047
   Mumby PJ, 2014, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V7, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.021
   Neslo R, 2008, NATO SCI PEACE SECUR, P265
   Niemeijer D, 2008, ECOL INDIC, V8, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.11.012
   Okey T.A., 2015, DEV INDICATORS MARIN
   Okey T.A., 2012, CLIM CHANG IMP VULN, P156
   Okey TA, 2003, ECOL MONOGR, V73, P415, DOI 10.1890/01-4088
   Okey TA, 2014, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V24, P519, DOI 10.1007/s11160-014-9342-1
   Parry M.L., 2007, IPCC Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
   Pecl G, 2011, Report
   Perry RI, 2013, PROG OCEANOGR, V115, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.pocean.2013.05.021
   Pörtner HO, 2010, J EXP BIOL, V213, P881, DOI 10.1242/jeb.037523
   Poloczanska ES, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P919, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1958, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1958]
   Preikshot D.B., 2007, INFLUENCE GEOGRAPHIC, P198
   Preikshot D, 2013, PROG OCEANOGR, V115, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.pocean.2013.05.020
   Rabalais NN, 2001, COAST EST S, V58, P115
   Rabalais NN, 2001, COAST EST S, V58, P211
   Reece J.S., 2013, PLOS ONE, V8
   Schuur EAG, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V119, P359, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0730-7
   Shin YJ, 2012, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V22, P835, DOI 10.1007/s11160-012-9252-z
   Shin YJ, 2010, ICES J MAR SCI, V67, P686, DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsp273
   Smith B, 2000, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V45, P223, DOI 10.1023/A:1005661622966
   SOUSA WP, 1984, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V15, P353, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002033
   Stortini C.H., 2014, THESIS DALHOUSIE U H, P178
   Teck SJ, 2010, ECOL APPL, V20, P1402, DOI 10.1890/09-1173.1
   Tibbetts J, 2006, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V114, pA216, DOI 10.1289/ehp.114-a216
   Tomczak MT, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0075439
   Vaquer-Sunyer R, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P15452, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0803833105
   Vinebrooke RD, 2004, OIKOS, V104, P451, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13255.x
NR 86
TC 58
Z9 68
U1 2
U2 125
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0964-5691
EI 1873-524X
J9 OCEAN COAST MANAGE
JI Ocean Coastal Manage.
PD MAR
PY 2015
VL 106
BP 35
EP 48
DI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.01.009
PG 14
WC Oceanography; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Oceanography; Water Resources
GA CC7FT
UT WOS:000350533800004
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT C
AU Brown, AJ
   Allen, PS
AF Brown, A. J.
   Allen, P. S.
BE Romano, D
   Bretzel, F
   Toscano, S
TI Commonplace or commonly replaced? Presence and population distribution
   of <i>Balsamorhiza hookeri</i> var. <i>hirsuta</i> in Utah compared to
   historic records
SO VIII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANDSCAPE AND URBAN HORTICULTURE
SE Acta Horticulturae
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
CT 8th International Conference on Landscape and Urban Horticulture
CY DEC 15-17, 2021
CL ELECTR NETWORK
SP Int Soc Hort Sci, Div Landscape & Urban Hort, Int Soc Hort Sci, Div Protected Cultivat & Soilless Culture, Int Soc Hort Sci, Working Grp Urban Hort, Univ Catania, Dept Agr, Food & Environm, Natl Res Council, Res Inst Terrestrial Ecosystems, Int Soc Hort Sci, Working Grp Landscape Hort
DE hairy balsamroot; species distribution; water-conserving species;
   conservation
AB As the Great Basin region of the western United States becomes warmer and drier, human communities and natural ecosystems are impacted by drought. Governments and water conservancy districts emphasize reducing water usage in landscaping. Using native plants adapted to climate conditions is another water-saving strategy, yet native plants are currently not widely used in designing Great Basin landscapes. Balsamorhiza hookeri var. hirsuta (hairy balsamroot) is a beautiful flowering-perennial with bright yellow flowers that bloom in early spring. It formerly grew widely throughout low-elevation mountain areas, foothills, and valleys where urban development exists today. In addition to potential landscaping applications, Balsamorhiza species are relevant to the conservation and restoration of sagebrush steppe communities which they frequently inhabit. This study seeks to investigate current distribution of B. hookeri var. hirsuta to understand how this distribution differs from historic records. We hypothesize that due to anthropogenic change, the plant no longer occupies many locations where it has grown in the past. A historical data set (1877-2000) of species population locations in Utah, USA was created using an online database of herbarium specimens. Using GoogleEarth and in-person field observations, we were able to a) determine if locations were currently natural or developed land areas, b) observe if B. hookeri was now present or absent in the location, and c) make observations regarding site conditions where the plant was formerly but not currently observed ( i.e., if the land was privatized, inhabited by invasive species, or used for grazing). Of the 48 observations included in the data set, the presence of hairy balsamroot was confirmed at only 4 locations. Hairy balsamroot was no longer observed at 13 points because of urban development. In at least 15 sites considered natural areas where B. hookeri was not found, there was either an abundance of invasive species which could outcompete native populations or evidence of heavy cattle grazing. These findings suggest potential factors contributing to the displacement of a plant that was seemingly once common. Domestication of the plant in urban landscapes and use in restoration efforts offer an opportunity to conserve this beautiful and important plant.
C1 [Brown, A. J.; Allen, P. S.] Brigham Young Univ, Provo, UT 84602 USA.
C3 Brigham Young University
RP Brown, AJ (corresponding author), Brigham Young Univ, Provo, UT 84602 USA.
EM alyssajoybrown@gmail.com
RI Brown, Amanda/KBD-2995-2024
FU Charles Redd Center
FX We would like to thank the Charles Redd Center whose funding contributed
   to the completion of this project. Special thanks to those who joined us
   in completing field validation work including Ashlee Weight, Bethanie
   Sonnefeld, Garrett Harding, Evan Percival, and Dakota Warner. An
   additional thanks to Eric Forbush for his aid with figure creation and
   Ashley Beazer for her revisions.
CR Blackmore LM, 2014, INSECT CONSERV DIVER, V7, P480, DOI 10.1111/icad.12071
   Canham Matt., 2021, The Salt Lake Tribune
   Cardinale BJ, 2012, NATURE, V486, P59, DOI 10.1038/nature11148
   Cilliers S., 2010, Urban biodiversity and design-implementing the convention on biological diversity in towns and cities, P81
   cwel.usu, 2015, Principles of Water Wise Landscaping
   Czech B, 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P593, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0593:EAACOS]2.0.CO;2
   Gillies RR, 2012, J CLIMATE, V25, P4679, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00084.1
   Helfand GE, 2006, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V78, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.08.001
   localscapes, 2017, WhatIsALocalscape
   Logan JA, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P101, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2007)017[0101:RAITFO]2.0.CO;2
   Mody K, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0234327
   Salisbury A, 2017, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V26, P2657, DOI 10.1007/s10531-017-1377-x
   slc.gov, 2018, Xeriscape with Native Plants
   Tallamy D.W., 2009, Bringing Nature Home: How You Can Sustain Wildlife with Native Plants, P360
   Zhou WQ, 2009, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V22, P744, DOI 10.1080/08941920802074330
NR 15
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 1
PU INT SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
PI LEUVEN 1
PA PO BOX 500, 3001 LEUVEN 1, BELGIUM
SN 0567-7572
EI 2406-6168
BN 978-94-62613-44-7
J9 ACTA HORTIC
PY 2022
VL 1345
BP 315
EP 320
DI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2022.1345.42
PG 6
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary; Environmental Studies; Horticulture
WE Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S); Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Science &amp; Humanities (CPCI-SSH)
SC Agriculture; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA BV7YU
UT WOS:001073826400041
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Wootten, AM
   Basagaoglu, H
   Bertetti, FP
   Chakraborty, D
   Sharma, C
   Samimi, M
   Mirchi, A
AF Wootten, A. M.
   Basagaoglu, H.
   Bertetti, F. P.
   Chakraborty, D.
   Sharma, C.
   Samimi, M.
   Mirchi, A.
TI Customized Statistically Downscaled CMIP5 and CMIP6 Projections:
   Application in the Edwards Aquifer Region in South-Central Texas
SO EARTHS FUTURE
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; decision-making; climate projections; groundwater;
   actionable science
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACTS; GROUNDWATER; SIMULATIONS; SECURITY; RUNOFF;
   MODELS; WATER
AB Climate projections are being used for decision-making related to climate mitigation and adaptation and as inputs for impacts modeling related to climate change. The plethora of available projections presents end users with the challenge of how to select climate projections, known as the "practitioner's dilemma." In addition, if an end-user determines that existing projections cannot be used, then they face the additional challenge of producing climate projections for their region that are useful for their needs. We present a methodology with novel features to address the "practitioner's dilemma" for generating downscaled climate projections for specific applications. We use the Edwards Aquifer region (EAR) in south-central Texas to demonstrate a process to select a subset of global climate models from both the CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensembles, followed by downscaling and verification of the accuracy of downscaled data against historical data. The results show that average precipitation changes range from a decrease of 10.4 mm to an increase of 25.6 mm, average temperature increases from 2.0 degrees C to 4.3 degrees C, and the number of days exceeding 37.8 degrees C (100 degrees F) increase by 35-70 days annually by the end of century. The findings enhance our understanding of the potential impacts of climate change on the EAR, essential for developing effective regional management strategies. Additionally, the results provide valuable scenario-based projected data to be used for groundwater and spring flow modeling and present a clearly documented example addressing the "practitioner's dilemma" in the EAR.
   Groundwater, constituting over one-third of global water resources, is crucial for sustaining ecosystems, agriculture, and drinking water supplies. In the face of climate change, rising temperatures and shifting precipitation patterns are anticipated to diminish the availability of groundwater for both societal and ecological requirements. Regional managers, in preparing for these changes, need localized climate projections for effective planning. However, the abundance of available climate projections poses a significant challenge for decision-makers in climate adaptation, known as the "practitioner's dilemma." This dilemma, though widely acknowledged, lacks a standardized solution. Our paper introduces a methodology to navigate this challenge, specifically tailored to the needs of the Edwards Aquifer Authority. This authority is actively engaged in implementing protection and habitat conservation plans to alleviate stress on groundwater and major springs in the Edwards Aquifer Region, located in south-central Texas. Our projections indicate that rising temperatures are likely to increase evapotranspiration, thereby exacerbating the strain on groundwater resources in this region as climate conditions evolve. Furthermore, our approach offers a customizable approach to "the practitioner's dilemma," potentially serving as a model for other decision-makers in the United States to effectively utilize climate projections in their strategic planning.
   This study presents a flexible approach to the challenge of selecting climate projections for decision-making We find projected temperature and precipitation changes will stress groundwater resources in the Edwards Aquifer using this approach
C1 [Wootten, A. M.] Univ Oklahoma, South Cent Climate Adaptat Sci Ctr, Norman, OK 73019 USA.
   [Basagaoglu, H.; Bertetti, F. P.; Samimi, M.] Edwards Aquifer Author, San Antonio, TX USA.
   [Chakraborty, D.; Sharma, C.] Univ Texas San Antonio, Sch Civil & Environm Engn & Construct Management, San Antonio, TX USA.
   [Mirchi, A.] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Biosyst & Agr Engn, Stillwater, OK USA.
C3 University of Oklahoma System; University of Oklahoma - Norman;
   University of Texas System; University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA);
   Oklahoma State University System; Oklahoma State University - Stillwater
RP Wootten, AM (corresponding author), Univ Oklahoma, South Cent Climate Adaptat Sci Ctr, Norman, OK 73019 USA.
EM amwootte@ou.edu
RI Wootten, Adrienne/AAI-3580-2020; Sharma, Chahat/KDM-8190-2024
OI Wootten, Adrienne/0000-0001-6004-5823
FU Edwards Aquifer Authority [22-016-AMS, G21AC10751]; Edwards Aquifer
   Authority, USA
FX We thank the anonymous reviewers of this article for their comments and
   critiques of this article. This research was supported by the Edwards
   Aquifer Authority, USA (Project # 22-016-AMS) and the United States
   Geological Survey's South Central Climate Adaptation Science Center
   (G21AC10751). Any opinion, findings, conclusions, and recommendations
   expressed in the publication are solely those of the authors. The
   computing for this project was performed at the OU Supercomputing Center
   for Education and Research (OSCER) at the University of Oklahoma. OSCER
   Executive Director Henry Neeman and OSCER Senior Systems Analyst David
   Atkin provided valuable technical expertise.
CR Abatzoglou JT, 2012, INT J CLIMATOL, V32, P772, DOI 10.1002/joc.2312
   Andrews T, 2012, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V39, DOI 10.1029/2012GL051607
   Barsugli J.J., 2013, Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, V94, P424, DOI DOI 10.1002/2013EO460005
   Bhatt G, 2023, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V59, P1313, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.13144
   Cannon AJ, 2015, J CLIMATE, V28, P6938, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00754.1
   Chakraborty D, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac2fde
   Chen J, 2016, CLIM DYNAM, V47, P3359, DOI 10.1007/s00382-016-3030-x
   Chen J, 2011, J HYDROL, V401, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.020
   Committee to Review the Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan, 2018, Review of the Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan: Report 3, DOI [10.17226/25200, DOI 10.17226/25200]
   Condon LE, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-14688-0
   Costantini M, 2023, EARTHS FUTURE, V11, DOI 10.1029/2022EF003068
   Crosbie RS, 2011, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V38, DOI 10.1029/2011GL047657
   Devitt TJ, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P2624, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1815014116
   Dixon K. W., 2020, South central climate projections evaluation project (CPrEP), DOI [10.21429/12gk-dh47, DOI 10.21429/12GK-DH47]
   ESGF User Support Working Team, 2019, Earth system grid federation: Federated nodes website
   Eyring V, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P1937, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
   Famiglietti JS, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P945, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2425
   Ferguson G, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P342, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1413, 10.1038/nclimate1413]
   Franklin J, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P473, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12051
   Fu ZH, 2022, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3389/feart.2021.755119
   Giordano M, 2009, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V34, P153, DOI 10.1146/annurev.environ.030308.100251
   Giuntoli I, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V150, P149, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2280-5
   Gordu F, 2023, J HYDROL ENG, V28, DOI 10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-5827
   Hausfather Z, 2022, NATURE, V605, P26, DOI 10.1038/d41586-022-01192-2
   Hawkins E, 2011, CLIM DYNAM, V37, P407, DOI 10.1007/s00382-010-0810-6
   Hawkins E, 2009, B AM METEOROL SOC, V90, P1095, DOI 10.1175/2009BAMS2607.1
   Hayhoe K., 2023, PREPRINT, DOI [10.22541/essoar.169462036.65393270/v1, DOI 10.22541/ESSOAR.169462036.65393270/V1]
   Jagannathan K, 2023, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102732
   Jagannathan K, 2020, CLIM SERV, V18, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100154
   Jagannathan K, 2021, B AM METEOROL SOC, V102, pE1579, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0296.1
   Jaramillo P, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V41, P907, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.04.005
   Keller AA., 2022, PLoS Water, V1, pe0000046, DOI [10.1371/journal.pwat.0000046, DOI 10.1371/JOURNAL.PWAT.0000046]
   Krysanova V, 2018, HYDROLOG SCI J, V63, P696, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2018.1446214
   Lafferty DC, 2023, NPJ CLIM ATMOS SCI, V6, DOI 10.1038/s41612-023-00486-0
   Lall U., 2018, U.S. Global Change Research Program, DOI [10.7930/NCA4.2018.CH3, DOI 10.7930/NCA4.2018.CH3]
   Lanzante JR, 2021, INT J CLIMATOL, V41, P3186, DOI 10.1002/joc.7013
   Lanzante JR, 2019, INT J CLIMATOL, V39, P2449, DOI 10.1002/joc.5964
   Li HB, 2010, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V115, DOI 10.1029/2009JD012882
   Lindgren R. J., 2004, US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5277, DOI [10.3133/SIR20045277, DOI 10.3133/SIR20045277, 10.3133/sir20045277]
   Loáiciga HA, 2000, J HYDROL, V227, P173, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00179-1
   Loáiciga HA, 2009, ENVIRON RES LETT, V4, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/035004
   Maraun D., 2023, Shaping tomorrow today SDGs from multiple perspectives, P15, DOI [10.1007/978-3-658-38319-02, DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-38319-02]
   Margat J, 2013, GROUNDWATER AROUND THE WORLD: A GEOGRAPHIC SYNOPSIS, P1
   Marvel K., 2023, Fifth National Climate Assessment, DOI DOI 10.7930/NCA5.2023.CH2
   McCabe GJ, 2016, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V52, P1046, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12431
   McSweeney CF, 2015, CLIM DYNAM, V44, P3237, DOI 10.1007/s00382-014-2418-8
   Neves GL, 2020, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V192, DOI 10.1007/s10661-020-08671-x
   O'Neill BC, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P3461, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016
   Parding KM, 2020, CLIM SERV, V18, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100167
   Pierce DW, 2023, J HYDROMETEOROL, V24, P951, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-22-0194.1
   Pierce DW, 2015, J HYDROMETEOROL, V16, P2421, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0236.1
   Piotrowski AP, 2021, J HYDROL, V601, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126629
   Pourmokhtarian A, 2016, ECOL APPL, V26, P1321, DOI 10.1890/15-0745
   Rahimpour Asenjan M., 2023, The dilemma of including hot models in climate impact studies: A hydrological study (preprint), DOI [10.5194/hess-2023-47, DOI 10.5194/HESS-2023-47]
   RECON Environmental Inc. Hicks Company Zara Environmental LLC BIOWEST, 2012, Edwards aquifer recovery implementation program habitat conservation plan
   [Reidmiller D.R. USGCRP USGCRP], 2018, 4 NATL CLIMATE ASSES, VII., DOI DOI 10.7930/NCA4.2018.CH8
   Riahi K, 2007, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V74, P887, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.026
   Rosegrant MW, 2009, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V34, P205, DOI 10.1146/annurev.environ.030308.090351
   Ross AC, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V157, P407, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02512-8
   Rummukainen M, 2016, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V7, P145, DOI 10.1002/wcc.378
   Rummukainen M, 2010, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V1, P82, DOI 10.1002/wcc.8
   Russo TA, 2017, NAT GEOSCI, V10, P105, DOI [10.1038/ngeo2883, 10.1038/NGEO2883]
   Sanderson BM, 2017, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V10, P2379, DOI 10.5194/gmd-10-2379-2017
   Schindel G. M., 2019, The Edwards Aquifer: The Past, Present, and Future of a Vital Water Resource, DOI [10.1130/2019.1215(02, DOI 10.1130/2019.1215(02]
   Scibek J, 2006, WATER RESOUR RES, V42, DOI 10.1029/2005WR004742
   Shaabani MK, 2023, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V9, P1681, DOI 10.1007/s40808-022-01580-7
   Siebert S, 2010, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V14, P1863, DOI 10.5194/hess-14-1863-2010
   Sun A.Y., 2020, Final Report
   Tabari H., 2016, J. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci, P1, DOI [DOI 10.5194/HESS-2016-106, 10.5194/hess-2016-106]
   Thornton MM, 2022, ORNL DAAC
   Trudel M, 2017, CLIMATE, V5, DOI 10.3390/cli5010019
   U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2015, Fish and Wildlife serviceendangered species act incidental Take Permit amendment
   van Vuuren DP, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P5, DOI [10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z, 10.1007/s10584-011-0157-y]
   Wootten A, 2017, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V56, P3245, DOI 10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0087.1
   Wootten A. M., 2024, **DATA OBJECT**, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.12775391
   Wootten A. M., 2024, **DATA OBJECT**, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.12775364
   Wootten A. M., 2024, U.S. Geological Survey Data release, DOI [10.5066/P13NMKWU, DOI 10.5066/P13NMKWU]
   Wootten AM, 2023, EARTH INTERACT, V27, DOI 10.1175/EI-D-22-0021.1
   Wootten AM, 2021, INT J CLIMATOL, V41, P980, DOI 10.1002/joc.6716
   Wu WY, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-17581-y
NR 80
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 3
U2 3
PU AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
PI WASHINGTON
PA 2000 FLORIDA AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20009 USA
EI 2328-4277
J9 EARTHS FUTURE
JI Earth Future
PD OCT
PY 2024
VL 12
IS 10
AR e2024EF004716
DI 10.1029/2024EF004716
PG 20
WC Environmental Sciences; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology &
   Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences
GA J0A0K
UT WOS:001333774600001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Salmela, MJ
   Cavers, S
   Cottrell, JE
   Iason, GR
   Ennos, RA
AF Salmela, Matti J.
   Cavers, Stephen
   Cottrell, Joan E.
   Iason, Glenn R.
   Ennos, Richard A.
TI Seasonal patterns of photochemical capacity and spring phenology reveal
   genetic differentiation among native Scots pine (<i>Pinus sylvestris</i>
   L.) populations in Scotland
SO FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptation; Chlorophyll fluorescence; Genetic differentiation; Scots
   pine; Seasonal variation; Spatial heterogeneity
ID CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE; CLIMATIC ADAPTATION; CONCEPTUAL ISSUES; LOCAL
   ADAPTATION; FROST HARDINESS; BUD-BURST; SEEDLINGS; TEMPERATURE; GROWTH;
   YIELD
AB Environment-driven genetic differentiation among populations is a common feature among forest trees, and an understanding of how populations have adapted to their home site conditions is essential for management and conservation practices. In Scotland, 84 native Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) woodlands are recognised by the Forestry Commission and they occupy highly diverse environments from the maritime west coast to continental sites in eastern Scotland. However, it is not known whether adaptations to local environments along sharp temperature and rainfall gradients have occurred in different populations and as a result, the seed transfer guidelines of the species are based only on data from isozymes and monoterpenes. In this study of an outdoor common-garden trial, we used chlorophyll fluorescence to examine whether seedlings from 32 open-pollinated families and eight populations from sites experiencing contrasting annual temperature regimes differed in their response to variation in natural outdoor temperatures between September 2009 and May 2010. In addition, growth initiation in spring was recorded. Photochemical capacity at photosystem II F-v/F-m showed a distinct seasonal trend and remained at relatively high levels (similar to 0.7) until November. Following a period of over 2 weeks with temperatures below or close to 0 degrees C, F-v/F-m started decreasing towards its minimum values recorded in early March when population means varied between 0.35 and 0.45. By early May and along with rising temperatures, photochemical capacity had recovered to the same level as observed in early November. Populations were found to respond differently to the cold period starting in December. The largest drop in photochemical capacity was observed in seedlings from a low-altitude population located in the maritime western Scotland, while in seedlings from higher-altitude locations in the cooler eastern Scotland, the response was smaller. In March, the recovery of photochemical capacity was slowest in seedlings from the mildest and coolest sites. Evidence of adaptive genetic differentiation was also found in spring phenology. Initiation of shoot elongation and needle flush were earlier in families from higher altitudes (cooler areas), but population differences were not significant at the alpha = 0.05 level. These results suggest that adaptation to the spatially heterogeneous environment in Scotland has taken place in Scots pine and that in order to minimise the risk of planting maladapted seed stock, the patterns of environmental and adaptive genetic variation should be taken into account in the management of genetic resources in this species. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Salmela, Matti J.; Cavers, Stephen] NERC Ctr Ecol & Hydrol Edinburgh, Penicuik EH26 0QB, Midlothian, Scotland.
   [Salmela, Matti J.; Ennos, Richard A.] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Evolutionary Biol, Sch Biol Sci, Ashworth Labs, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, Midlothian, Scotland.
   [Cottrell, Joan E.] No Res Stn, Roslin EH25 9SY, Midlothian, Scotland.
   [Iason, Glenn R.] Macaulay Land Use Res Inst, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland.
C3 UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH); University of Edinburgh;
   James Hutton Institute
RP Cavers, S (corresponding author), NERC Ctr Ecol & Hydrol Edinburgh, Bush Estate, Penicuik EH26 0QB, Midlothian, Scotland.
EM m.j.salmela@sms.ed.ac.uk; scav@ceh.ac.uk;
   joan.cottrell@forestry.gsi.gov.uk; g.iason@macaulay.ac.uk;
   rennos@ed.ac.uk
RI Cavers, Stephen/B-7806-2010
OI Cavers, Stephen/0000-0003-2139-9236
FU Scottish Forestry Trust; NERC; Forestry Commission; EU; NERC
   [NE/H003959/1] Funding Source: UKRI
FX The authors wish to thank Scottish Forestry Trust for funding (MJS' PhD
   studentship), Dave Sim, Joan Beaton, and Ben Moore (Macaulay Institute)
   for making the seed collections, Lucy Sheppard for lending the Handy PEA
   device, Alysha Sime for assistance with height measurements, NERC, the
   Forestry Commission and EU-funded Network of Excellence EVOLTREE for
   support, UK Met Office for the climate data, and an anonymous reviewer
   for comments that improved the manuscript.
CR Aitken SN, 2008, EVOL APPL, V1, P95, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2007.00013.x
   Aitken SN, 2001, TREE PHYSIOL SER, V1, P23
   Andersson B, 2004, SILVAE GENET, V53, P76, DOI 10.1515/sg-2004-0014
   [Anonymous], B FORESTRY COMMISSIO
   Aranda I, 2005, TREE PHYSIOL, V25, P1085, DOI 10.1093/treephys/25.8.1085
   Baker NR, 2004, J EXP BOT, V55, P1607, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erh196
   BALL MC, 1995, AUST J PLANT PHYSIOL, V22, P311, DOI 10.1071/PP9950311
   Beuker E, 1998, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V107, P87, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00344-7
   BEUKER E, 1994, TREE PHYSIOL, V14, P961, DOI 10.1093/treephys/14.7-8-9.961
   BILLINGTON HL, 1991, FUNCT ECOL, V5, P403, DOI 10.2307/2389812
   BJORKMAN O, 1987, PLANTA, V170, P489, DOI 10.1007/BF00402983
   Bolhar-Nordenkampf H. R., 1993, P193
   BRADBURY IK, 1978, CAN J FOREST RES, V8, P207, DOI 10.1139/x78-032
   Cregg BM, 2001, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V154, P131, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00626-5
   Critchfield W.B., 1966, USDA MISCELLANEOUS P, V991, P64
   DORMLING I, 1992, CAN J FOREST RES, V22, P88, DOI 10.1139/x92-013
   Dougherty P.M., 1994, Ecological Bulletins, V43, P64
   Falconer D.S., 1996, Quantitative Genetics
   FORREST GI, 1980, FORESTRY, V53, P101, DOI 10.1093/forestry/53.2.101
   GENTY B, 1989, BIOCHIM BIOPHYS ACTA, V990, P87, DOI 10.1016/S0304-4165(89)80016-9
   GILLIES SL, 1990, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V80, P148
   GRACE J, 1993, NATO ADV SCI INST SE, V244, P105
   Harrison S. J., 1997, Botanical Journal of Scotland, V49, P287
   Houle D, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P1793, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0906195106
   Howe GT, 2003, CAN J BOT, V81, P1247, DOI [10.1139/b03-141, 10.1139/B03-141]
   Hurme P, 1997, CAN J FOREST RES, V27, P716, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-27-5-716
   Ingvarsson PK, 2011, NEW PHYTOL, V189, P909, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03593.x
   Jones A. T., 1999, Scottish Forestry, V53, P237
   Karhu A, 1996, THEOR APPL GENET, V93, P215, DOI 10.1007/BF00225748
   Kawecki TJ, 2004, ECOL LETT, V7, P1225, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00684.x
   KINLOCH BB, 1986, NEW PHYTOL, V104, P703, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1986.tb00671.x
   Koski V., 1985, Crop physiology of forest trees. Proceedings of an international conference on managing forest trees as cultivated plants, held in Finland, 23-28 July 1984, P167
   Leinonen I, 1996, SCAND J FOREST RES, V11, P122, DOI 10.1080/02827589609382919
   LINDGREN K, 1993, TREE PHYSIOL, V13, P97, DOI 10.1093/treephys/13.1.97
   Lines R., 1965, RESULTS SOME OLDER S, P172
   Linhart YB, 1996, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V27, P237, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.237
   López R, 2009, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V23, P509, DOI 10.1007/s00468-008-0297-5
   Lundmark T, 1988, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V2, P110, DOI 10.1007/BF00196757
   Mason W.L., 2004, Managing the Pinewoods of Scotland
   Matyas C, 1996, EUPHYTICA, V92, P45, DOI 10.1007/BF00022827
   Maxwell K, 2000, J EXP BOT, V51, P659, DOI 10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659
   McKay JK, 2005, RESTOR ECOL, V13, P432, DOI 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00058.x
   McKay JK, 2002, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V17, P285, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02478-3
   MOHAMMED GH, 1995, SCAND J FOREST RES, V10, P383, DOI 10.1080/02827589509382904
   Neale DB, 2011, NAT REV GENET, V12, P111, DOI 10.1038/nrg2931
   Nilsson JE, 1990, SCAND J FOREST RES, V5, P501, DOI 10.1080/02827589009382633
   OLEKSYN J, 1992, NEW PHYTOL, V120, P561, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01806.x
   Öquist G, 2003, ANNU REV PLANT BIOL, V54, P329, DOI [10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.072402 .115741, 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.072402.115741]
   OTTANDER C, 1995, PLANTA, V197, P176, DOI 10.1007/BF00239954
   Parker IM, 2003, CONSERV BIOL, V17, P59, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02019.x
   Perks M. P., 1999, Botanical Journal of Scotland, V51, P103
   Perks MP, 1997, FORESTRY, V70, P223, DOI 10.1093/forestry/70.3.223
   Perry M, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1023, DOI 10.1002/joc.1160
   Persson B, 1990, SCAND J FOREST RES, V5, P381, DOI 10.1080/02827589009382621
   Petit RJ, 2006, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V37, P187, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110215
   Provan J, 1998, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V265, P1697, DOI 10.1098/rspb.1998.0491
   Repo T, 2000, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V14, P456, DOI 10.1007/s004680000059
   Repo T, 2006, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V126, P224, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00626.x
   Ruotsalainen S., 1995, Forest Genetics, V2, P189
   Salmela M.J., 2011, THESIS U EDINBURGH
   Salmela MJ, 2010, FORESTRY, V83, P535, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpq036
   SARVAS R., 1962, COMMUN INST FOREST FENN, V53, P1
   Savolainen O, 2007, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V38, P595, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095646
   STEINER KC, 1979, SILVAE GENET, V28, P185
   Strand M, 1987, TREE PHYSIOL, V3, P211, DOI 10.1093/treephys/3.3.211
   Taulavuori KMJ, 2004, NEW PHYTOL, V162, P427, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01042.x
   Wachowiak W, 2011, HEREDITY, V106, P775, DOI 10.1038/hdy.2010.118
   WORRELL R, 1992, FORESTRY, V65, P253, DOI 10.1093/forestry/65.3.253
   WRIGHT JONATHAN W., 1966, SILVAE GENET, V15, P101
   Ying CC, 2006, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V227, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.02.028
NR 70
TC 41
Z9 42
U1 0
U2 45
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0378-1127
EI 1872-7042
J9 FOREST ECOL MANAG
JI For. Ecol. Manage.
PD SEP 15
PY 2011
VL 262
IS 6
BP 1020
EP 1029
DI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.037
PG 10
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA 800NM
UT WOS:000293367800013
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Jiang, ZY
   Fang, SB
   Wu, D
   Liu, X
   Zhao, HR
   Guo, J
   Zhang, XR
   Zhu, YC
   Li, X
   Wu, YJ
   Wu, DR
AF Jiang, Zhaoyang
   Fang, Shibo
   Wu, Dong
   Liu, Xin
   Zhao, Huarong
   Guo, Jie
   Zhang, Xinru
   Zhu, Yongchao
   Li, Xuan
   Wu, Yingjie
   Wu, Dingrong
TI Response to climate warming of winter wheat varieties bred across
   different eras in the North China Plain
SO SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate warming; Winter wheat varieties; Breeding; Fertilization;
   Response
ID TEMPERATURE TRENDS; NIGHT TEMPERATURE; CROPPING SYSTEMS; YIELD; GROWTH;
   LIMITS; PATTERNS; MAXIMUM; IMPACT
AB By the 2000s, the winter wheat regions in the North China Plain had undergone six major variety renewals. It is crucial to know how the winter wheat varieties bred across different eras respond to climate change, especially climate warming. From 2017 to 2022, we conducted a two-factor, two-level field experiment at Gucheng and Raoyang, with a temperature difference of 1 degrees C existing between the two sites. The experiment used ten winter wheat varieties bred from the 1960s to the 2000s and included both fertilization and no fertilization treatments. The experiment aimed to separate the effects of warming and fertilization on the growth and development of the winter wheat varieties, thereby revealing the differences in their responses to warming. All the winter wheat varieties across different eras had higher yields in warmer environments. By separating the effects of warming and fertilization, the rate of yield increase decreased with the breeding eras of varieties due to the impact of warming alone. However, it still increased with the eras due to the combined effects of warming and fertilization. For varieties from the 1980s and 2000s, there is a strong correlation between higher fertility and warmer climate adaptability. Warming has a yield gain effect, significantly amplifying the yield increase under fertilization for the middle and late varieties. Therefore, the average yield increase for varieties from the 2000s reached 67% in warmer environments. Warming has increased the average daily minimum temperature during the winter wheat growing season. It has significantly reduced the number of days below zero degrees Celsius, shortening the overwintering stage and thereby shortening the growth period of winter wheat. However, the effective developmental days (>0 degrees C days) maintained a consistent level. Warming promotes the development of large tillers, increases leaf area and dry matter accumulation, and reduces the ratio of sterile spikelets. The varieties from the 2000s had the lowest ratio of sterile spikelets and the highest harvest index (HI) in warmer environments, resulting in a significant increase in yield. This study reveals the differential responses to the warming of winter wheat varieties across different eras, which have a specific reference for winter wheat breeding to cope with climate change.
C1 [Jiang, Zhaoyang; Fang, Shibo; Zhao, Huarong; Li, Xuan; Wu, Dingrong] Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, State Key Lab Severe Weather, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
   [Wu, Dong] Anhui Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm, Hefei 230036, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Xin; Guo, Jie; Zhang, Xinru] Raoyang Natl Climatol Observ, Hengshui 053900, Peoples R China.
   [Zhu, Yongchao] China Meteorol Adm, Meteorol Observat Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
   [Wu, Yingjie] Meteorol Data Ctr, Shandong Meteorol Bur, Jinan 250031, Peoples R China.
C3 China Meteorological Administration; Chinese Academy of Meteorological
   Sciences (CAMS); Anhui Agricultural University; China Meteorological
   Administration
RP Fang, SB (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, State Key Lab Severe Weather, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
EM sbfang0110@163.com
RI Zhang, Xinru/KMX-9529-2024
FU Development Program of China [2023YFE0122200]; National Natural Science
   Foundation of China [42075193]
FX This work was supported by the Development Program of China (Grant No.
   2023YFE0122200) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China
   (Grant No. 42075193).
CR Baigorria GA, 2008, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V148, P1353, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.04.002
   Bailey-Serres J, 2019, NATURE, V575, P109, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1679-0
   Cao L H., 2014, MOD AGR SCI TECHNOL, V9, P57
   China Meteorological Administration, 1993, SPEC AGR OBS, P7
   Cui D C., 1984, ATLAS CLIMATE RESOUR, P4
   [DENG ZhenYong 邓振镛], 2008, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V28, P3760
   Du R Y., 2006, ECOL SCI, V25, P25
   Easterling DR, 1997, SCIENCE, V277, P364, DOI 10.1126/science.277.5324.364
   Fang SB, 2015, EUR J AGRON, V64, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2014.12.012
   Fang SB, 2012, SCI CHINA EARTH SCI, V55, P1021, DOI 10.1007/s11430-012-4404-5
   Fang ShiBo Fang ShiBo, 2010, Zhongguo Shengtai Nongye Xuebao / Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, V18, P1116, DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2010.01116
   Fang ShiBo Fang ShiBo, 2010, Scientia Agricultura Sinica, V43, P3251
   Fang Z., 2013, SHANDONG AGR SCI, V45, P114
   Fang Z., 2011, CHIN SEED IND, V12, P31
   [高辉明 Gao Huiming], 2013, [中国农业科学, Scientia Agricultura Sinica], V46, P2201
   [郭海英 GUO Hai-ying], 2008, [土壤通报, Journal of Soil Science], V39, P1252
   [郭建平 Guo Jianping], 2015, [应用气象学报, Journal of Applied Meteorolgical Science], V26, P1
   [郭建平 Guo Jianping], 2002, [中国生态农业学报, Chinese journal of eco-agriculture], V10, P17
   He D, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abc71a
   Hu Q, 2005, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V135, P284, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.01.001
   [胡洵瑀 Hu Xunyu], 2019, [中国农业大学学报, Journal of China Agricultural University], V24, P16
   IPCC, 2023, Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, DOI [DOI 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647, 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.001]
   Jin S B., 1996, CHINESE WHEAT SCI, P10
   Jin S B., 1996, CHINESE WHEAT SCI, P304
   Ju Hui Ju Hui, 2005, Acta Agronomica Sinica, V31, P1340
   KARL TR, 1993, B AM METEOROL SOC, V74, P1007, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1993)074<1007:ANPORG>2.0.CO;2
   KENNEDY AD, 1995, GLOB CHANGE BIOL, V1, P29, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.1995.tb00004.x
   Klein JA, 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V11, P1440, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00994.x
   Li KeNan Li KeNan, 2012, Acta Agronomica Sinica, V38, P1483
   [李茂松 Li Maosong], 2005, [自然灾害学报, Journal of Natural Disasters], V14, P55
   Li YB, 2023, ANN BOT-LONDON, V131, P503, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcad003
   Li Z S., 2010, CHINA RURAL SCI TEC, V3, P26
   Lin Z J., 2011, MOD AGR SCI TECH, V24, P103
   Liu Y J., 2007, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V3, P229, DOI DOI 10.1016/0959-3780(96)00018-0
   Liu ZhiJuan Liu ZhiJuan, 2010, Scientia Agricultura Sinica, V43, P2280
   Lobell DB, 2007, ENVIRON RES LETT, V2, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/2/1/014002
   Lobell DB, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P616, DOI [10.1126/science.1206376, 10.1126/science.1204531]
   Lv ZF, 2013, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V171, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.12.008
   Marco B, 2011, REGIONAL ENV CHANGE, V11, P151
   Mei X R., 2015, ATLAS AGR CLIMATE RE, P29
   Norby RJ, 1997, GLOB CHANGE BIOL, V3, P259, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1997.00072.x
   Olesen JE, 2011, EUR J AGRON, V34, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2010.11.003
   Ortiz R, 2008, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V126, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.019
   Parry ML, 2004, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V14, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.008
   Qian SA, 2010, SCI CHINA EARTH SCI, V53, P1506, DOI 10.1007/s11430-010-4064-2
   Reynolds M, 2012, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V35, P1799, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02588.x
   Sadras VO, 2006, FIELD CROP RES, V99, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2006.04.003
   Shiferaw B, 2013, FOOD SECUR, V5, P291, DOI 10.1007/s12571-013-0263-y
   [宋艳玲 Song Yanling], 2022, [应用气象学报, Journal of Applied Meteorolgical Science], V33, P454
   Sun B Q., 2004, SPECIAL WHEAT NO CHI, P14
   [谭方颖 Tan Fangying], 2010, [气象, Meteorological Monthly], V36, P40
   [谭凯炎 Tan Kaiyan], 2017, [中国农业气象, Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology], V38, P333
   [谭凯炎 Tan Kaiyan], 2009, [应用气象学报, Journal of Applied Meteorolgical Science], V20, P634
   Tian HQ, 2012, ENVIRON RES LETT, V7, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044020
   [田兴帅 Tian Xingshuai], 2019, [麦类作物学报, Journal of Triticeae Crops], V39, P1112
   [田展 TIAN Zhan], 2006, [自然资源学报, Journal of Natural Resources], V21, P598
   Vrindts E, 2003, BIOSYST ENG, V85, P141, DOI 10.1016/S1537-5110(03)00040-0
   Wan YunFan Wan YunFan, 2014, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, V30, P123
   Wang Y., 2012, CHIN SEED IND, V9, P14
   Wen X Y., 2011, T CHINESE SOC AGR EN, V27, P74, DOI DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2011.z2.015
   Writing Committee for The Fourth National Assessment Report on Climate Change, 2022, WRITING COMMITEE 4 N, P1
   Xiao DengPan Xiao DengPan, 2012, Zhongguo Shengtai Nongye Xuebao / Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, V20, P1539, DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.01539
   [肖永贵 Xiao Yonggui], 2017, [麦类作物学报, Journal of Triticeae Crops], V37, P212
   Xiong W, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V81, P205, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9123-5
   Yang XG, 2011, AGR SCI CHINA, V10, P585, DOI 10.1016/S1671-2927(11)60040-0
   Yang XiaoGuang Yang XiaoGuang, 2011, Scientia Agricultura Sinica, V44, P1562
   Yu Q, 2014, INT J CLIMATOL, V34, P518, DOI 10.1002/joc.3704
   Zhao Ben, 2012, Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao, V23, P3141
   Zhao Jin Zhao Jin, 2010, Scientia Agricultura Sinica, V43, P1860
   [郑冬晓 Zheng Dongxiao], 2015, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V35, P4338
   Zhou T W., 2014, RES WHEAT PRODUCTION, P13
   Zhu WQ, 2007, CHINESE SCI BULL, V52, P3253, DOI 10.1007/s11434-007-0521-5
   [庄恒扬 Zhuang Hengyang], 2003, [农业系统科学与综合研究, System Sciences and Comprehensive Studies in Agriculture], V19, P71
NR 73
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 3
PU SCIENCE PRESS
PI BEIJING
PA 16 DONGHUANGCHENGGEN NORTH ST, BEIJING 100717, PEOPLES R CHINA
SN 1674-7313
EI 1869-1897
J9 SCI CHINA EARTH SCI
JI Sci. China-Earth Sci.
PD DEC
PY 2024
VL 67
IS 12
SI SI
BP 3855
EP 3867
DI 10.1007/s11430-023-1432-0
EA NOV 2024
PG 13
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology
GA M9E1R
UT WOS:001351176300001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, TY
   Li, MC
   Wang, Y
   Zhou, J
   Li, YH
   Zhang, F
   Cao, JF
   Chen, XY
   He, BJ
AF Zhang, Tianyu
   Li, Mingcai
   Wang, Yong
   Zhou, Jie
   Li, Yonghua
   Zhang, Fen
   Cao, Jingfu
   Chen, Xianyan
   He, Bao-Jie
TI Refined building thermal climate zoning scheme in regions with
   mountainous terrain for accurate building energy-saving potential
   estimation
SO ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
LA English
DT Article
DE Building thermal climate; Mountainous terrain; Climate zoning scheme;
   Heating degree days; Cooling degree days; Building energy efficiency
ID INTERPOLATION; TEMPERATURE; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES; COMFORT
AB Building thermal climate (BTC) zoning is important for building energy efficiency. However, previous BTC zoning has been mainly performed at national and regional scales, without sufficient attention to small-scale regions and even less so for terrain -complex regions. Typically, the complex terrain in mountainous areas causes the spatial heterogeneity of city and local climates, which can reduce BTC zoning accuracy if city and local climate variability is not considered. Therefore, this study aims to refine BTC zoning scheme for mountainous areas, by examining the accuracy of refined BTC zoning scheme and analyzing its benefit for building energy efficiency. Chongqing, a mountainous China municipality consisting of 38 districts and towns, was chosen as a representative case to perform BTC zoning scheme refinement. The results indicate that the refined zoning scheme is conducive to improving zoning resolution, coverage, accuracy, and reliability. First, the BTC zones based on China National Standard GB50176-2016 only cover four districts and towns while the zoning types of all other 34 districts and towns are assumed based on spatial proximity. The refined one can determine the zoning types of all 38 districts and towns based on robust quantitative analysis. Second, Chongqing was refined into three BTC zone types, while there were only two BTC zone types in Chongqing Standard DBJ50-102 - 2010. The zoning types of 21 districts and towns changed, two of which were reclassified to Mild Zone A (MZ_A) from the original Hot Summer and Cold Winter Zone A (HSCWZ_A). The refined zoning scheme can help improve building energy efficiency potential. Based on the refined zoning scheme, the annual heating energy use reduction ranged between 14.0 % - 21.7 % over 2011 - 2020, the annual cooling energy use increase ranged between 4.3 % - 7.6 %, and the reduction of energy use for heating and cooling was similar to 2 %. Overall, this study provides a theoretical and methodological reference to understand BTC zoning refinement in mountainous areas. Based on the refined zoning scheme, all districts and towns in Chongqing can practically adjust their building energy efficiency strategies for better climate adaptation.
C1 [Zhang, Tianyu; Wang, Yong; Zhou, Jie; Li, Yonghua; Zhang, Fen; He, Bao-Jie] CMA Key Open Lab Transforming Climate Resources Ec, Chongqing 401147, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Tianyu; Wang, Yong; Zhou, Jie; Li, Yonghua; Zhang, Fen] Chongqing Climate Ctr, Chongqing 401147, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Mingcai; Cao, Jingfu] Tianjin Inst Meteorol Sci, Tianjin 300074, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Xianyan] China Meteorol Adm, Natl Climate Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
   [He, Bao-Jie] Chongqing Univ, Ctr Climate Resilient & Low Carbon Cities, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Key Lab New Technol Construct Cities Mt Area,Minis, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China.
   [He, Bao-Jie] Chongqing Univ, Inst Smart City Chongqing Univ Liyang, Liyang 213300, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
C3 China Meteorological Administration; Chongqing University; Chongqing
   University
RP He, BJ (corresponding author), Chongqing Univ, Ctr Climate Resilient & Low Carbon Cities, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Key Lab New Technol Construct Cities Mt Area,Minis, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China.
EM baojie.unsw@gmail.com
RI chen, zhaoyang/GRS-1470-2022; He, Bao-jie/ABC-5621-2020; Li,
   Chaoqun/KIL-7588-2024
FU China Meteorological Administration "Research on Value realization of
   climate ecological products" Youth Innovation Team Project
   [CMA2024QN15]; Foundation Project of China Meteorological Administration
   Key Open Laboratory of Transforming Climate Resources to Economy
   [2023016, 2023018, 2023009, 2023011]; Three Gorges Climate Monitoring
   Project of China [SK2021015]; China Three Gorges Corporation [0704182];
   Key Innovation Team of China Meteorological Administration "Climate
   Change Detection and Response" [CMA2022ZD03]; Chongqing Meteorological
   Department Business Technology Research Project [YWJSGG-202306]
FX This work was financially supported by the China Meteorological
   Administration "Research on Value realization of climate ecological
   products" Youth Innovation Team Project (No. CMA2024QN15) , the
   Foundation Project of China Meteorological Administration Key Open
   Laboratory of Transforming Climate Resources to Economy (No. 2023016,
   2023018, 2023009, and 2023011) , China Three Gorges Corporation
   (No.0704182) , Three Gorges Climate Monitoring Project of China
   (SK2021015) , Key Innovation Team of China Meteorological Administration
   "Climate Change Detection and Response" (No. CMA2022ZD03) , and
   Chongqing Meteorological Department Business Technology Research Project
   (No. YWJSGG-202306) .
CR [Anonymous], 2018, National Geographic Map of China, V2nd
   ANSI/ASHRAE, 2013, ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 169-2013 Climatic Data for Building Design Standards, V8400, P104, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-78110-x
   ASHRAE, 2021, ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 169-2021
   Athalye R., 2016, ASHRAE Trans., P431
   Attia S, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V45, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.025
   Bai LJ, 2022, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/atmos13091498
   Bai LJ, 2020, ADV BUILD ENERGY RES, V14, P389, DOI 10.1080/17512549.2019.1653367
   Bai LJ, 2020, ENERGY, V195, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.116982
   BEAR-iD NOBATEK, 2016, European Climate Zones And Bio-Climatic Design Requirements
   Briggs R.S., 2003, ASHRAE Trans., P109
   Briggs R.S., 2003, ASHRAE Trans., V109, P1
   C.E.C. Standard, 2010, DBJ50-102-2010)
   Cheng B., 2019, Chongqing Climate Change Assessment Report
   Cheng SJ, 2019, INT J GLOBAL WARM, V18, P173, DOI 10.1504/IJGW.2019.100316
   Chinese Industry Standard, 2014, JGJ/T 346-2014)
   Chinese Meteorological Industry Standard, 2004, QX/T 22-2004)
   Chinese National Standard, 2021, GB 55015-2021)
   Chinese National Standard, 2016, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of PRC. Code for Thermal Design of Civil Buildings (GB 50176-2016)
   Chinese National Standard, 2015, Design code for heating ventilation and air conditioning of industrial buildings (GB50019-2015)
   Chinese National Standard, 2021, General code for building environment (GB 55016-2021)
   Chinese National Standard, 2012, Design code for heating ventilation and air conditioning of civil buildings (GB50736-2012)
   Chongqing Bureau of Statistics, 2022, Chongqing Statistical Yearbook of 2021
   Chongqing Meteorological Administration, 2021, Climatological Atlas of Chongqing Municipality
   Chongqing Municipal People's Government, 2023, BRIEF INTRO CHONGQIN
   Deng X, 2021, J BUILD ENG, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102778
   Dong Q., 2021, J INFRASTRUCT PRESER, V2, P5, DOI [10.1186/s43065-021-00020-7, DOI 10.1186/S43065-021-00020-7]
   GIVONI B, 1992, ENERG BUILDINGS, V18, P11, DOI 10.1016/0378-7788(92)90047-K
   Gupta R, 2023, ENERG BUILDINGS, V298, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113549
   Holdaway MR, 1996, CLIMATE RES, V6, P215, DOI 10.3354/cr006215
   Karra Krishna, 2021, 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS, P4704, DOI 10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9553499
   Khambadkone NK, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V128, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.11.029
   Kottek M, 2006, METEOROL Z, V15, P259, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130
   Lang Q, 2019, SENSORS-BASEL, V19, DOI 10.3390/s19235239
   Li MC, 2022, ENERG BUILDINGS, V271, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112323
   Liao DQ, 2021, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V143, P279, DOI 10.1007/s00704-020-03433-8
   Liu Y. L., 2020, Journal of Meteorology and Environment, V36, P97
   Liu Y, 2023, J THERM SCI, V32, P1155, DOI 10.1007/s11630-023-1449-z
   Mazzaferro L, 2020, BUILD SIMUL CONF PR, P3955, DOI 10.26868/25222708.2019.210884
   Mazzaferro L, 2020, ENERG BUILDINGS, V225, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110303
   Remizov A, 2023, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/buildings13030694
   Ren Z.H, 2018, ADV METEOR SCI TECHN, V8, P54
   Sebastian R., 2017, Python Machine Learning: Machine Learning and Deep Learning with Python, Scikit-Learn, and TensorFlow, V2nd
   Shi QW, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12072695
   Spain Codigo Tecnico de la Edifificacion (CTE), 2006, Real Decreto 314/2006 de 17 de Marzo
   Verichev K, 2021, APPL SCI-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/app11073251
   Verichev K, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V160, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106165
   Verichev K, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V40, P352, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.04.020
   Walsh A, 2022, ENERGY, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124477
   Walsh A, 2018, APPL ENERG, V212, P416, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.044
   Walsh A, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V146, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.044
   Walsh A, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V112, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.046
   Wang SY, 2023, BUILD SIMUL-CHINA, V16, P1041, DOI 10.1007/s12273-023-1017-1
   Wang ZW, 2021, J BUILD ENG, V43, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103156
   Wu TT, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V44, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.012
   Xiong J, 2019, ENERG BUILDINGS, V186, P355, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.01.005
   Yang L., 2010, Bioclimatic Architecture
   Yang L, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V171, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106663
   Zhang TY, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19148530
   Zhao M, 2015, ENERG BUILDINGS, V96, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.03.007
NR 59
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 7
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA PO BOX 564, 1001 LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND
SN 0378-7788
EI 1872-6178
J9 ENERG BUILDINGS
JI Energy Build.
PD JUN 15
PY 2024
VL 313
AR 114228
DI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114228
EA MAY 2024
PG 20
WC Construction & Building Technology; Energy & Fuels; Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Energy & Fuels; Engineering
GA TE1L2
UT WOS:001239492800001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU De Toni, A
   Vizzarri, M
   Di Febbraro, M
   Lasserre, B
   Noguera, J
   Di Martino, P
AF De Toni, Andrea
   Vizzarri, Matteo
   Di Febbraro, Mirko
   Lasserre, Bruno
   Noguera, Joan
   Di Martino, Paolo
TI Aligning Inner Peripheries with rural development in Italy: Territorial
   evidence to support policy contextualization
SO LAND USE POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Inner Peripheries; Inner areas; Context indicators; Rural development
   policy; Territorial cohesion; Integrated planning
ID ECONOMIC-PERFORMANCE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; REGIONAL LEVEL; EU; AREAS;
   MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE; FOOD; EXPENDITURE; COHESION
AB Inner Peripheries is a recent concept based on both peripherality and marginality features, thus far from the commonly adopted geographical notion of periphery. Inner Peripheries are fragile territories covering rural Europe, which suffer from depopulation, low economic potential, and weak territorial cohesion. However, these territories are extremely important for the provision of goods and services, and the stewardship of natural and semi-natural environments. Such dichotomous condition poses several challenges for planning in the EU context, particularly regarding the implementation of the Rural Development Policy. Therefore, current planning needs to contextualize the policy implementation by considering local needs and territorial resources in the Inner Peripheries. With a focus on the Italian case, the main aim of the present work is to explore to what extent Inner Peripheries cope with Rural Development targets, in the light of improving the effectiveness of planning interventions. We create and implement a set of context indicators to describe the Inner Peripheries' territorial characteristics through fine scale analyses and test their alignment with the Rural Development Policy through ANOVA and PCA. The results show that the indicators' set is significant and robust in depicting the current territorial potentialities and limitations of the Inner Peripheries towards strengthening rural development. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the Inner Peripheries exhibit alignments and misalignments with rural development targets, depending on localities, and exogenous and endogenous characteristics. We find that the Inner Peripheries in Italy need to develop holistic strategies incorporating different Rural Development Priorities, such as increased competitiveness in agriculture and forestry sectors, sustainable use of resources and climate adaptation, which may also contribute to foster territorial cohesion. We argue that strategies with less consideration of environmental and social aspects may be counterproductive for the local development in Inner Peripheries. Performing an ex-ante assessment of the main characteristics of the Inner Peripheries through e.g. the use of the indicators' framework as proposed, may support the decision-making processes in selecting planning priorities. Considering the large replicability and comparability of the indicators' set, the findings of the present study are useful to further understand how rural development is considered in territorial strategies for Inner Peripheries in similar contexts in Europe.
C1 [De Toni, Andrea; Di Febbraro, Mirko; Lasserre, Bruno; Di Martino, Paolo] Univ Molise, Dipartimento Biosci & Terr, Pesche, Isernia, Italy.
   [De Toni, Andrea] Politecn Milan, Dept Architecture & Urban Studies, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
   [Vizzarri, Matteo] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr JRC, Ispra, Italy.
   [Noguera, Joan] Univ Valencia, Inst Local Dev, Valencia, Spain.
C3 University of Molise; Polytechnic University of Milan; European
   Commission Joint Research Centre; EC JRC ISPRA Site; University of
   Valencia
RP De Toni, A (corresponding author), Politecn Milan, Dept Architecture & Urban Studies, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
EM andrea.detoni@polimi.it; matteo.vizzarri@ec.europa.eu;
   mirko.difebbraro@unimol.it; lasserre@unimol.it; joan.noguera@uv.es;
   dimartin@unimol.it
RI Di Febbraro, Mirko/GQA-4462-2022; Vizzarri, Matteo/H-9544-2019; De Toni,
   Andrea/AAT-2273-2020; Lasserre, Bruno/G-1409-2011
OI Di Martino, Paolo/0000-0001-8853-7520; Lasserre,
   Bruno/0000-0003-1150-8064; Di Febbraro, Mirko/0000-0001-8898-7046;
   Vizzarri, Matteo/0000-0002-9505-783X; De Toni,
   Andrea/0000-0002-3573-7585
CR Agnoletti M, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V126, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.012
   Aguglia L., 2009, 113 EAAE SEM 3 6 SEP, P3
   Angioloni S, 2019, GROWTH CHANGE, V50, P548, DOI 10.1111/grow.12295
   [Anonymous], 2019, European Commission
   [Anonymous], 2016, FOREST@, DOI DOI 10.3832/efor0082-013
   [Anonymous], 2016, Research for AGRI Committee, CAP Reform Post-2020, Challenges in Agriculture
   [Anonymous], 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
   Aria M, 2019, SOC INDIC RES, V142, P431, DOI 10.1007/s11205-018-1909-0
   Balzan MV, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V75, P711, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.025
   Barca F., 2014, STRATEGY INNER AREAS
   Benedek J, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V90, P516, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.020
   Berbel J., 2007, IWMI BOOKS
   Bertolini P, 2017, BIO-BASED APPL ECON, V6, P183, DOI 10.13128/BAE-18518
   Bock B., 2014, CHANGING SOCIAL CHAR, P193
   Bojnec S, 2014, ACTA OECON, V64, P197, DOI 10.1556/AOecon.64.2014.2.4
   Bolognini S., 2018, Food Diversity Between Rights, Duties and Autonomies, P91, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75196-2_5
   Bonfiglio A, 2017, J RURAL STUD, V53, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.005
   Bonsinetto F., 2013, TERRITORIAL DISSIMIL
   BOTS PWG, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
   Brelik A., 2013, EUR RES STUD, V16, P67
   Camaioni B, 2016, EUR REV AGRIC ECON, V43, P433, DOI 10.1093/erae/jbv024
   Camera dei Deputati, 2019, RET BAND ULTR
   Carrosio G., 2016, INNER PERIPHERIES PE, V19, P50, DOI 10.3280/SP2016-003004
   Cesaro L, 2017, ITAL J PLAN PRACT, V7, P100
   Chiodo E, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11020432
   Cielo P., 2003, VIABILITA AGROSILVOP
   Cislaghi A, 2019, SPRINGER SER GEOMECH, P11, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-89671-7_2
   Coppola A, 2014, ECON AGRAR RECUR NAT, V14, P177, DOI 10.7201/earn.2014.01.14
   Copus A, 2017, ITAL J PLAN PRACT, V7, P24
   Crescenzi R., 2016, EU COHESION POLICY R, DOI [10.4324/9781315401867., DOI 10.4324/9781315401867.]
   Cullotta S., 2011, ENVIRON PLANN, P107
   Dax T., 2018, EUR STRUCT INVEST FU, V6
   Dax T, 2018, EUR PLAN STUD, V26, P297, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2017.1361596
   De Vincenti C., 2018, RELAZIONE ANN STRATE
   Demir M, 2007, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V41, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.006
   Doucet P., 2014, EUROPEAN J SPATIAL D, V12, P1
   ESA, 2011, VIA BORGH PROG REC V
   ESPON, 2018, INN PER EUR POSS DEV
   ESPON, 2012, CLIM CHANG MAY HAMP
   European Commission, 2016, DEF PROX IND RUR DEV
   European Commission, 2017, MY REG MY EUR OUR FU
   European Commission, 2017, TECHN HDB MON EV FRA
   European Commission, 2016, COM(2016)739
   European Commission, 2018, A Clean Planet for All. A European Strategic Long-Term Vision for a Prosperous, Modern, Competitive and Climate Neutral Economy
   Fekó A, 2011, STUD AGRIC ECON, V113, P152, DOI 10.7896/j.1111
   Forleo MB, 2017, EUR COUNTRYS, V9, P435, DOI 10.1515/euco-2017-0026
   Foucher A, 2019, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V284, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2019.106582
   Galdeano-Gómez E, 2017, NEW MEDIT, V16, P50
   Giannakis E, 2015, LAND USE POLICY, V45, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.12.009
   Gloersen E., 2016, RES REGI COMMITTEE S, DOI [10.2861/144693., DOI 10.2861/144693.]
   Graf N, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V660, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.370
   Haarich S., 2017, ENTREPRENEURSHIP ISL, DOI [10.2863/170465., DOI 10.2863/170465]
   Hippoliti G., 1976, Italian Journal of Forest and Mountain Environments, V31, P242
   Istat, 2013, 6 CENS GEN AGR ATL A
   Joshi O., 2015, INT J FOR RES, V2015, DOI DOI 10.1155/2015/926303.
   Knickel K, 2018, J RURAL STUD, V59, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.04.012
   KRZANOWSKI WJ, 1979, J AM STAT ASSOC, V74, P703, DOI 10.2307/2286995
   Kühn M, 2015, EUR PLAN STUD, V23, P367, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2013.862518
   Legendre L., 1998, Numerical ecology, V2nd ed.
   Lezzi B., 2018, RELAZIONE ANN STRATE
   Lucatelli S., 2013, Education, Local Economy and Job Opportunities in Rural Areas in the Context of Demographic Change: Proceedings of the 2nd EURUFU Scientific Conference, Asti, Italy, 8 October 2013, P69
   Lucatelli S., 2016, AGRIREGIONIEUROPA, V12
   Magomedova N.A., 2013, Reg. Probl. Econ. Transform., V4, P184
   Mantino F., 2016, AGRIREGIONIEUROPA, V45
   Marchetti R, 2017, INT SER PUBLIC POLIC, P275, DOI 10.1057/978-1-349-94938-0_14
   Marongiu S., 2016, AGRIREGIONIEUROPA, V12, P55
   Matthews A., 2007, RURAL DEV EUROPEAN U
   Menconi ME, 2016, RENEW ENERG, V93, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.034
   Mikus O, 2019, AGR ECON-CZECH, V65, P143, DOI 10.17221/229/2018-AGRICECON
   Moteva Milena, 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V362, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/362/1/012034
   Mussida C., 2012, Is there a southern sclerosis? Worker reallocation and regional unemployment in Italy
   Nam WH, 2016, IRRIGATION SCI, V34, P129, DOI 10.1007/s00271-016-0488-6
   Niedertscheider M, 2014, LAND USE POLICY, V39, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.015
   Noguera J., 2016, Agriregionieuropa, V45
   Noguera J., 2017, final report
   Novak M, 2017, ECON RES-EKON ISTRAZ, V30, P705, DOI 10.1080/1331677X.2017.1311229
   Oppido S, 2019, SMART INNOV SYST TEC, V100, P615, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-92099-3_69
   Ota I., 2011, LEG ASP EUR FOR SUST, P54
   Galve JP, 2015, LANDSLIDES, V12, P101, DOI 10.1007/s10346-014-0478-9
   Perpina Castillo C., 2018, JRC114016
   Pettenella D., 2016, Agriregionieuropa, V45
   Piorr A, 2015, ECOL INDIC, V59, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.060
   Pisani E., 2017, SOCIAL CAPITAL LOCAL, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-54277-5_6., DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-54277-5_6.]
   Plieninger T, 2015, BIOL CONSERV, V190, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.014
   Pomeanu EE, 2012, ENVIRON ENG MANAG J, V11, P439, DOI 10.30638/eemj.2012.055
   Prestia G, 2018, GREEN ENERGY TECHNOL, P635, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_43
   PRZYBYLA K, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU10062095
   Recchia L, 2019, RESOURCES-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/resources8010056
   Medeiros EJR, 2014, IMPACT ASSESS PROJ A, V32, P198, DOI 10.1080/14615517.2014.915134
   Sallustio L, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V201, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.031
   Samuels J, 2017, CULT AGRIC FOOD ENVI, V39, P90, DOI 10.1111/cuag.12097
   Sandu A.-M., 2014, REV MANAG COMP INT, V15, P470
   Schirpke U, 2014, ECOSYST SERV, V9, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.003
   Schlager S., 2017, Statistical Shape and Deformation Analysis, P217, DOI [10.1093/bioinformatics/btac173, DOI 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTAC173]
   Servillo L, 2016, ITAL J PLAN PRACT, V6, P42
   Sousa-Uva J.M., 2013, EUS RURAL DEV POLICY
   Sundmaeker H., 2016, International Journal on Food System Dynamics, V7, P371
   Sundmaeker H, 2016, RIVER PUBL SER COMM, V49, P129
   Terres JM, 2015, LAND USE POLICY, V49, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.009
   Tobias S, 2019, SUSTAIN SCI, V14, P405, DOI 10.1007/s11625-018-0532-y
   Todorovic M., 2007, Options Mditerranennes, VVolume 57, P101
   Tulla A.F., 2017, HUM GEOGR, V11
   Uchida K, 2015, J APPL ECOL, V52, P1033, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12443
   Uchida K, 2014, ECOL MONOGR, V84, P637, DOI 10.1890/13-2170.1
   Uthes S, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V60, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.016
   Vagnozzi A., 2015, Rivista di Economia Agraria, V70, P345
   Vladu CE, 2016, INT MULTI SCI GEOCO, P553
   Wheeler B., 2016, LMPERM PERMUTATION T
   Wriedt G, 2009, J HYDROL, V373, P527, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.05.018
   Wu J., 2015, COST BENEFIT STUDIES, P299, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-981-287-393-4_14.
   Younjun K., 2012, EC WORKING PAPERS
   Zasada I, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V77, P344, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.053
   Zasada I, 2017, GEOFORUM, V82, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.03.012
NR 113
TC 23
Z9 23
U1 1
U2 28
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-8377
EI 1873-5754
J9 LAND USE POLICY
JI Land Use Pol.
PD JAN
PY 2021
VL 100
AR 104899
DI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104899
PG 14
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA PF2ZP
UT WOS:000598929300003
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Butler, JRA
   Rochester, W
   Skewes, TD
   Wise, RM
   Bohensky, EL
   Katzfey, J
   Kirono, DGC
   Peterson, N
   Suadnya, W
   Yanuartati, Y
   Handayani, T
   Habibi, P
   Jaya, KD
   Sutaryono, Y
   Masike-Liri, B
   Vaghelo, D
   Duggan, K
AF Butler, James R. A.
   Rochester, Wayne
   Skewes, Tim D.
   Wise, Russell M.
   Bohensky, Erin L.
   Katzfey, Jack
   Kirono, Dewi G. C.
   Peterson, Nate
   Suadnya, Wayan
   Yanuartati, Y.
   Handayani, Tarningsih
   Habibi, Putrawan
   Jaya, Komang Damar
   Sutaryono, Yusuf
   Masike-Liri, Barbara
   Vaghelo, Desmond
   Duggan, Kate
TI How Feasible Is the Scaling-Out of Livelihood and Food System Adaptation
   in Asia-Pacific Islands?
SO FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptation pathways; food security; Indonesia; islands; livelihoods;
   Papua New Guinea; scaling-deep; scaling-up
ID NUSA TENGGARA BARAT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; GLOBAL CHANGE; PATHWAYS;
   AGRICULTURE; PROVINCE; IMPACT; PERSPECTIVES; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT
AB The sustainable development and food security of islands in the Asia-Pacific region is severely compromised by climate change, sea level rise and compounding socio-economic issues. To achieve a step-change in food production and climate adaptation, livelihoods must rapidly transform. Food security programs continue to apply the "pipeline" model of scaling-out technological innovations, but do not account for the social-ecological complexity of islands. We tested the feasibility of scaling-out adaptation strategies in two provinces in the region: Nusa Tenggara Barat in Indonesia, and West New Britain in Papua New Guinea. Guided by a sub-district typology of resource use, we trialled a participatory, systems-based livelihood adaptation pathways approach in sub-district case studies. The process aimed to mainstream social learning and future uncertainty into community development decision-making, yielding 'no regrets' adaptation strategies to transform livelihoods. We tested two assumptions: first, that because the contexts of all villages were homogenous, strategies were sufficiently similar to enable scaling-out across the provinces; second, that the sub-district typologies would assist scaling-out within each type. The results showed that the first assumption was untenable: there was very little similarity amongst villages' strategies; only sustainable fisheries management was scalable amongst coastal villages. The second was marginally tenable, because there were strong similarities amongst villages in an off-shore island type. When pooled into classes of adaptation strategy, most related to practice and behaviour change, and addressed systemic social issues; very few were technological. Our results suggest that scaling-out livelihood and food system innovations is not feasible due to the complex social-ecological contexts within islands, caused by steep climate gradients, natural resource and cultural diversity. We discuss the limitations of a resource use typology that aimed to mitigate this complexity and guide scaling-out. Instead we argue that appropriate social learning approaches akin to livelihood adaptation pathways must be mainstreamed into existing community development decision cycles, thereby "scaling-up" and "scaling-deep" to tackle institutional, political and cultural barriers to transformation. We discuss the implications of our recommendations for government and donor support for food security programs in islands of the Asia-Pacific region, and future research priorities.
C1 [Butler, James R. A.] CSIRO Land & Water, EcoSci Precinct, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
   [Rochester, Wayne; Skewes, Tim D.] CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
   [Wise, Russell M.] CSIRO Land & Water, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
   [Bohensky, Erin L.] CSIRO Land & Water, Australian Trop Sci Precinct, Aitkenvale, Qld, Australia.
   [Katzfey, Jack; Kirono, Dewi G. C.] CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, Aspendale, Vic, Australia.
   [Peterson, Nate] Nature Conservancy, Pacific Div, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
   [Suadnya, Wayan; Yanuartati, Y.; Handayani, Tarningsih; Jaya, Komang Damar] Univ Mataram, Fac Agr, Mataram, Indonesia.
   [Habibi, Putrawan] Sekolah Tinggi Pariwisata, Mataram, Indonesia.
   [Sutaryono, Yusuf] Univ Mataram, Fac Anim Sci, Mataram, Indonesia.
   [Masike-Liri, Barbara] Nature Conservancy, Papua New Guinea Field Off, Port Moresby, Papua N Guinea.
   [Vaghelo, Desmond] West New Britain Prov Adm, Forestry Div, Kimbe, Papua N Guinea.
   [Duggan, Kate] Griffin NRM, London Circuit, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
C3 Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO);
   Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO);
   Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO);
   CSIRO Land & Water; Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research
   Organisation (CSIRO); Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research
   Organisation (CSIRO); CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere; Universitas Mataram;
   Universitas Mataram; Nature Conservancy
RP Butler, JRA (corresponding author), CSIRO Land & Water, EcoSci Precinct, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
EM james.butler@csiro.au
RI Butler, James/D-7446-2011; Wise, Russell/G-5463-2010; Jaya,
   I/R-1422-2019; Sutaryono, Yusuf Akhyar/GSO-0791-2022; Katzfey,
   Jack/AAQ-9845-2020; Bohensky, Erin/C-3636-2011; Rochester,
   Wayne/K-1569-2018; Katzfey, Jack/K-1231-2012
OI Bohensky, Erin/0000-0002-4159-5325; Rochester,
   Wayne/0000-0002-7315-9341; Kirono, Dewi/0000-0002-9142-3572; Yanuartati,
   Baiq Yulfia Elsadewi/0009-0004-0735-9937; Jaya, I Komang
   Damar/0000-0001-9194-344X; Katzfey, Jack/0000-0002-0604-8860; Butler,
   James/0000-0001-8333-947X
FU Australian Government's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT),
   through the DFAT-CSIRO Research for Development Alliance (NTB); Coral
   Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security (WNB)
FX The authors acknowledge funding provided for this work by the Australian
   Government's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), through the
   DFAT-CSIRO Research for Development Alliance (NTB) and the Coral
   Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security (WNB).
CR [Anonymous], 2018, PACIFIC ADAPTATION C
   [Anonymous], SOCIAL CULTURAL EC T
   [Anonymous], 2011, Human Development Report
   [Anonymous], 2001, GLOB ENV CHANGE PART, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00018-3
   [Anonymous], 2018, CORAL TRIANGLE INITI
   [Anonymous], PREL FIG PAP NEW GUI
   [Anonymous], 2011, INT J INTERDISCIP SO, DOI DOI 10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/V05I12/51964
   [Anonymous], AGR RES DEV CSIRO RE
   [Anonymous], 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.003
   Asian Development Bank, 2011, ADB PAC STUD SER
   Badan Pusat Statistik, 2015, STAT NUS TENGG BAR P
   Bell J.D., 2016, CLIMATE CHANGE PACIF
   Biermann F, 2012, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V4, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.01.014
   Biggs Stephen, 2007, International Journal of Agricultural Resources Governance and Ecology, V6, P144, DOI 10.1504/IJARGE.2007.012701
   Bohensky EL, 2016, CLIM RISK MANAG, V12, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2015.11.004
   Borcard D, 2011, USE R, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7976-6
   Bourke R. M., 2005, Development Bulletin, P27
   Bunce M, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.11.005
   Butler JRA, 2016, CLIM RISK MANAG, V12, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2015.11.003
   Butler JRA, 2016, CLIM RISK MANAG, V12, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2016.01.001
   Butler JRA, 2016, CLIM RISK MANAG, V12, pA1, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2016.05.002
   Butler JRA, 2015, COAST MANAGE, V43, P346, DOI 10.1080/08920753.2015.1046802
   Butler JRA, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P368, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.004
   Butler JRA, 2014, MAR POLICY, V46, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.12.011
   Butler J. R. A., 2012, W NEW BRIT FUT WORKS
   Butler J. R. A., 2018, LIVELIHOOD ADAPTATIO
   Butler JRA, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V104, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.014
   Butler JRA, 2017, SOCIAL SCIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY, P109
   Butler JRA, 2017, SOCIAL SCIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY, P51
   Carter MR, 2006, J DEV STUD, V42, P178, DOI 10.1080/00220380500405261
   Climate Development Knowledge Network, 2014, IPCCS 5 ASS REP WHAT
   Descheemaeker K, 2019, EXP AGR, V55, P169, DOI 10.1017/S001447971600048X
   Dinesh D, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10082616
   Dufrene M, 1997, ECOL MONOGR, V67, P345, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0345:SAAIST]2.0.CO;2
   Ensor J., 2011, UNCERTAIN FUTURES AD, DOI [10.3362/9781780440392, DOI 10.3362/9781780440392]
   Ensor J, 2015, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V6, P509, DOI 10.1002/wcc.348
   Foale S, 2013, MAR POLICY, V38, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.033
   Foran T, 2014, WORLD DEV, V61, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.023
   Franke AC, 2014, EUR J AGRON, V58, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2014.04.002
   Franzel S, 2001, AGR SYST, V69, P37, DOI 10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00017-8
   Giller KE, 2009, FIELD CROP RES, V114, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017
   Gillespie S, 2015, ADV NUTR, V6, P440, DOI 10.3945/an.115.008276
   Gunawan A. L., 2020, CLIM DEV
   Herrero M, 2017, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V1, P33
   Hoegh-Guldberg Ove., 2009, The Coral Triangle and Climate Change: Ecosystems, People and Societies at Risk
   Kalinoe L., 2009, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW R
   Keating BA, 2014, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V3, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2014.08.004
   Kirono DGC, 2016, CLIM RISK MANAG, V12, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2015.12.002
   Koczberski G., 2006, 506 TNC
   Kristjanson P, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P5, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2080
   Lemos MC, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Lipper L, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P1068, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2437, 10.1038/nclimate2437]
   Lisson S, 2010, AGR SYST, V103, P486, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.05.002
   Liu S, 2016, CLIM RISK MANAG, V12, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2015.11.005
   Luetz J., 2017, WERE NOT REFUGEES WE, P3, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-70703-7_1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-70703-7_1]
   Maru YT, 2018, AGR SYST, V165, P344, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.04.010
   McGillivray M., 2012, HEADLINES POOR IS W
   McGregor JL, 2016, CLIM RISK MANAG, V12, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2015.10.001
   Moore M. L., 2015, J CORPORATE CITIZENS, V58, P67, DOI [https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.4700.2015.ju.00009, DOI 10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2015.JU.00009]
   *NAT RES I, 2010, PAP NEW GUIN DISTR P
   Ojiem J. O., 2006, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, V4, P79
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Porter JR, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P485
   Reed MS, 2013, ECOL ECON, V94, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.007
   Rochester WA, 2016, CLIM RISK MANAG, V12, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2015.11.002
   Rodima-Taylor D, 2012, APPL GEOGR, V33, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.10.011
   Scherr S.J., 2012, Agriculture Food Security, V1, P1
   Skewes TD, 2016, CLIM RISK MANAG, V12, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2015.08.001
   Steenwerth KL., 2014, Agric Food Secur, V3, P1, DOI [10.1186/2048-7010-3-11, DOI 10.1186/2048-7010-3-11]
   Steffen W, 2015, ANTHROPOCENE REV, V2, P81, DOI 10.1177/2053019614564785
   Taslim Sjah Taslim Sjah, 2006, Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, V13, P39
   Thornton PK, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V52, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.06.003
   Tompkins E, 2002, ENVIRON PLANN A, V34, P1095, DOI 10.1068/a34213
   Tschakert P, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V40, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.004
   UN OHRLLS, 2015, Small island developing states in numbers
   Walker B, 2010, CROP SCI, V50, pS10, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2009.10.0565
   Westermann O, 2018, AGR SYST, V165, P283, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.07.007
   Wise RM, 2016, CLIM RISK MANAG, V12, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2015.11.001
   Wise RM, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002
   Yasin I., 2007, WATER MANAGEMENT LOM, P53
NR 80
TC 22
Z9 23
U1 8
U2 26
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2571-581X
J9 FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S
JI Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
PD APR 23
PY 2020
VL 4
AR 43
DI 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00043
PG 15
WC Food Science & Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Food Science & Technology
GA LO0WC
UT WOS:000533349300001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Khiyat, Z
AF Khiyat, Ziad
TI Groundwater in the Arab region: making the invisible visible
SO DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT
LA English
DT Article; Proceedings Paper
CT 14th Water-Sciences-and-Technology-Association (WSTA) Gulf Water
   Conference - Water in the GCC... Towards Economic Efficiency and
   Financial Sustainability
CY FEB 13-15, 2022
CL Riyadh, SAUDI ARABIA
SP Arab Fund Econ & Social Dev, Saudi Minist Environm Water & Agr, Water Sci & Technol Assoc, Saline Water Convers Corp
AB The Arab region is one of the most water scarce regions in the world with 19 states below the water scarcity threshold including 13 states below the absolute water scarcity. Groundwater is heavily relied upon and it is the primary source of freshwater in more than 11 Arab States, yet the invisible and complex character of groundwater being underground and out of sight has not given it the due attention it deserves. Hence, this report explores the importance of groundwater and the challenges it is facing, with the aim of bolstering its status to a strategic resource for the Arab region. Amid the water scarcity situation, limited renewable groundwater resources continue to be exploited at an unsustainable rate, exceeding the natural recharge rates. Excessive use of groundwater, especially by the agricultural sector combined with low efficiency, has led to the decline in groundwater storage in more than two thirds of the Arab region, where the area of decline has doubled in 2018-2019 compared to 2002. In some countries over 88% of all irrigation water comes from groundwater compared to a global average of just over 37%. Moreover, it is projected that by 2050, available groundwater per capita will have decreased by more than half since the beginning of the century and 17 Arab States, accounting for 79% of the total population, will be below the absolute water scarcity threshold. In addition to their excessive use, groundwater resources are also threatened by anthropo-genic pollution sources, from agricultural and industrial practices and from sea water intrusion in coastal cities. The deterioration in the quality of groundwater resources, both due to overexploita-tion and pollution is aggravating the problem of water scarcity. For example, in Beirut, seawater intrusion has shifted inland between 500 and 1,200 m from 1970 reference point. In Gaza, only 25% of wastewater is treated due the lack of proper wastewater collection and treatment infrastructure, which is further complicated by the occupation that has restricted access to natural resources. This is alarming knowing that groundwater is central to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and targets adopted in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in the region. It is directly linked to SDG6 and central to achieving many other SDGs such as SDG2 for ending hunger. It is also an important component of climate change adaptation, having a high buffer capacity against drought. Accordingly, the projected impacts of climate change on water resources in the region, will further increase dependency on groundwater at a time when groundwater recharge is also projected to decrease, necessitating conjunctive management of surface water and groundwater. The impacts of climate change on groundwater at the aquifer level is showcased by ESCWA on the Beni-Amir aquifer, Morocco and the Eocene aquifer, Palestine. Results from the study on Beni-Amir aquifer indicate that the water table is expected to decrease 10 to 25 m (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, respectively) by end of century, resulting in partial depletion of resources in the top three layers of the aquifer system, particularly in the northern Beni-Amir area. In the case of Palestine, the results on the Eocene aquifer showed that in the 2041-2060 horizon, the average precipitation is expected to decrease in all scenarios between 3% and 12%, whereas the recharge in 5 out of 6 precipitation scenarios showed a reduction by 12%-16%. Consequently, with no decrease in the aquifer pumping, the water levels in all scenarios will drop.
   The declining availability of groundwater resources due to increased consumption, develop-ment demands, inefficient use and climate change should prompt Arab States to explore innova-tive and integrated governance frameworks to improve groundwater resources management and ensure equitable access for current and future generations to this strategic resource. Groundwater governance has been historically weak in the Arab region, characterized by fragmented legislations and policies, limited funding, lack of coordination and lack of data and knowledge. More recent evaluation of the management of groundwater resources through the SDG indicator 6.5.1 report-ing mechanisms on the degree of implementation of IWRM has unfortunately reinforced some of the main challenges listed above in the Arab region mainly in terms of lack of implementation of management tools and proper financing. In response to the lack or fragmentation of groundwater management policies, ESCWA developed regional groundwater abstraction management guidelines offering a unified approach to deal with uncontrolled groundwater exploitation and use. Groundwater governance is further complicated by transboundary aquifers. In fact, all coun-tries, except for Comoros, share at least one aquifer with their neighboring countries. These trans-boundary aquifers cover almost 58% of the Arab region's total area. Some of these aquifers are directly connected to surface-water hydrological systems and should also be conjunctively man-aged. Other transboundary aquifers contain fossil groundwater reserves requiring specialized legal, policy and management frameworks that consider their non-renewable character. The status of regional transboundary water cooperation is captured in a recent regional report prepared by ESCWA on the progress on SDG indicator 6.5.2 in the Arab region for the year 2021. The report revealed the challenges faced by the Arab states that hinder the establishment of well-developed cooper-ation frameworks which are mainly linked to lack of knowledge and data exchange and financial constraints. However, there are encouraging signs where cooperation on transboundary aquifers has progressed, including a Joint Authority for the Nubian sandstone Aquifer, a cooperation framework for the Senegalo-Mauritanian Aquifer, a signed agreement for the Saq-Ram Aquifer, and a consulta-tion mechanism on the North Western Sahar Aquifer System. These cooperation agreements should be maintained and further developed by holding regular meetings, coordinating objectives and management plans, and regularly exchanging data and information. Regional knowledge exchange around these agreements should be enforced. Advances in technologies provide an opportunity to fill the data and information gap that hin-ders the management of groundwater. Integrated remote sensing data offer a solution to assess the groundwater status. In addition, Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) is one of the most important solutions to consider for securing water supply and for improving groundwater quality where it is deteriorating. MAR is already used in more than 44 sites across the Arab region. Technologies can assist in selection of where MAR can be a potential solution for the region and for improving the water security. Furthermore, in response to the need for availing more data and information on groundwater and improving access to such data as established through the reporting on SDG indicators 6.5.1 and 6.5.2, ESCWA will be initiating an Arab Groundwater Digital Knowledge Platform.
   This platform aims to increase access to regional knowledge and information on groundwater resources through a dedicated digital interactive platform. Finally, the relation of groundwater to water scarcity, human activity, transboundary water cooperation, climate change, and water governance is highlighted in the following key findings.
C1 [Khiyat, Ziad] Econ & Social Commiss Western Asia UN ESCWA, Beirut, Lebanon.
RP Khiyat, Z (corresponding author), Econ & Social Commiss Western Asia UN ESCWA, Beirut, Lebanon.
EM khayat@un.org
NR 0
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 5
U2 30
PU DESALINATION PUBL
PI HOPKINTON
PA 36 WALCOTT VALLEY DRIVE,, HOPKINTON, MA 01748 USA
SN 1944-3994
EI 1944-3986
J9 DESALIN WATER TREAT
JI Desalin. Water Treat.
PD JUL
PY 2022
VL 263
BP 204
EP 206
DI 10.5004/dwt.2022.28231
EA AUG 2024
PG 3
WC Engineering, Chemical; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Engineering; Water Resources
GA 4X3CM
UT WOS:000860724000028
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Choo, LM
   Forest, F
   Wieringa, JJ
   Bruneau, A
   de la Estrella, M
AF Choo, Le Min
   Forest, Felix
   Wieringa, Jan J.
   Bruneau, Anne
   de la Estrella, Manuel
TI Phylogeny and biogeography of the Daniellia clade (Leguminosae:
   Detarioideae), a tropical tree lineage largely threatened in Africa and
   Madagascar
SO MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Molecular phylogenetics; Ancestral range estimation; Forest-savannah
   transitions; Guineo-Congolian rainforest; Conservation assessments
ID FOUNDER-EVENT SPECIATION; EVOLUTION; DIVERSITY; FORESTS; CLIMATE; MODEL;
   GENUS; DIVERSIFICATION; CLASSIFICATION; CONSERVATION
AB The legume subfamily Detarioideae is exceptionally diverse in tropical Africa and Madagascar, compared to South America or Asia, a trend contrary to that shown by most other pantropical plant groups. We aim to elucidate the process of diversification giving rise to these high diversity levels by focussing our investigations on the Daniellia Glade, which is present in both Africa and Madagascar. The Daniellia Glade is an early-diverging lineage of subfamily Detarioideae (Leguminosae; pea family) and consists of three genera: Daniellia, Brandzeia and Neoapaloxylon. The species belonging to this group exhibit a wide range of habitat types. The Madagascar endemics Brandzeia (1 species) and Neoapaloxylon (3 species) occupy dry woodlands and arid succulent habitats respectively. Daniellia alsteeniana and D. oliveri are found in savannahs while the remaining eight species within Daniellia all occupy rainforest habitats. Phylogenetic analyses were generated from a dense, mull-individual species level sampling of the Glade. Divergence time estimates were carried out using a molecular clock method to investigate biogeographical patterns and shifts in habitat types within the Daniellia Glade, and conservation assessments were conducted to determine the levels of extinction risks these species are facing. We estimate that the Daniellia Glade first emerged during the Early Eocene from an ancestor present in the rainforests of North Africa at that time, reflecting an ancestral habitat preference. There was a first major split over the course of the Eocene, giving rise to both African rainforest and Madagascan savannah lineages. With the emergence of a drier climate and vegetation type in Africa during the Eocene, it is likely that a dry-climate adapted lineage from the Daniellia Glade ancestor could have dispersed through suitable savannah or woodland regions to reach Madagascar, subsequently giving rise to the savannah-adapted ancestor of Brandzeia and Neoapaloxylon in the Early Miocene. The African rainforest lineage gave rise to the genus Daniellia, which is postulated to have first diversified in the Middle Miocene, while savannah species of Daniellia emerged independently during the Pliocene, coinciding with the global rise of C4-dominated grasslands. More than half of the species in the Daniellia Glade are near threatened or threatened, which highlights the need to understand the threats of anthropogenic pressures and climate change these species are facing to prioritise their conservation.
C1 [Choo, Le Min] Natl Pk Board, Herbarium Res & Conservat Branch, Singapore Bot Gardens, 1 Cluny Rd, Singapore 259569, Singapore.
   [Choo, Le Min; Forest, Felix; de la Estrella, Manuel] Royal Bot Gardens, Richmond TW9 3DS, Surrey, England.
   [Wieringa, Jan J.] Natl Herbarium Netherlands, Nat Biodivers Ctr, Darwinweg 2, NL-2333 CR Leiden, Netherlands.
   [Bruneau, Anne] Univ Montreal, Inst Rech Biol Vegetale, 4101 Sherbrooke Est, Montreal, PQ H1X 2B2, Canada.
   [Bruneau, Anne] Univ Montreal, Dept Sci Biol, 4101 Sherbrooke Est, Montreal, PQ H1X 2B2, Canada.
   [de la Estrella, Manuel] Univ Cordoba, Dept Bot Ecol & Fisiol Vegetal, Campus Rabanales, E-14071 Cordoba, Spain.
C3 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Naturalis Biodiversity Center; Universite de
   Montreal; Universite de Montreal; Universidad de Cordoba
RP Choo, LM (corresponding author), Natl Pk Board, Herbarium Res & Conservat Branch, Singapore Bot Gardens, 1 Cluny Rd, Singapore 259569, Singapore.; Choo, LM (corresponding author), Royal Bot Gardens, Richmond TW9 3DS, Surrey, England.
EM choo_le_min@nparks.gov.sg
RI Wieringa, Jan/D-9517-2015; de la Estrella, Manuel/JNR-3076-2023
OI de la Estrella, Manuel/0000-0002-4484-3566; Choo, Le
   Min/0000-0002-1609-8343
FU Lee Foundation through the National Parks Board of Singapore; European
   Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie
   Sklodowska-Curie programme [659152]; Natural Sciences and Engineering
   Research Council of Canada; Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [659152] Funding
   Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
FX We are grateful to the staff of the cited herbaria for their support
   during our visits and for loan of material. We thank Gwilym P. Lewis,
   Bente Klitgard, Aurelie Grall and Xander van der Burgt, for their help
   at the Kew herbarium and Laszlo Csiba for his assistance in the
   laboratory. Xander van der Burgt, David Du Puy and Landy Rajaovelona
   also provided the Daniellia and Neoapaloxylon photographs used in the
   graphical abstract. Boris Domenech provided additional help for the
   processing of samples housed in Montreal. We thank the associate editor
   Rachel Jabaily, Domingos Cardoso and two further anonymous reviewers for
   their comments on a previous version of the manuscript. L.M.C. was
   funded by the Lee Foundation through the National Parks Board of
   Singapore, M.D.L.E. was funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020
   research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie
   programme (grant agreement 659152; GLDAFRICA) and research in the
   Bruneau laboratory was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering
   Research Council of Canada. This study is essentially the MSc thesis of
   L.M.C. as part of the Plant and Fungal Taxonomy, Diversity and
   Conservation Master's program (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, and Queen
   Mary University of London), supervised by M.D.L.E. and F.F.
CR AKAIKE H, 1974, IEEE T AUTOMAT CONTR, VAC19, P716, DOI 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   [Anonymous], 2006, DNA TISSUE BANKING B
   [Anonymous], 2012, IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1
   [Anonymous], NATURAL HIST MADAGAS, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01527.x
   [Anonymous], 1999, AMBER FOREST
   [Anonymous], 2007, ACTUALISATION DONNES
   [Anonymous], 2005, Legumes of the world
   [Anonymous], 2014, TRACER V 1 6
   [Anonymous], 2005, Legumes of the world
   Arakaki M, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P8379, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1100628108
   Axelrod D. I., 1978, Biogeography and ecology of Southern Africa. Vol.1., P77
   Azani N, 2017, TAXON, V66, P44, DOI 10.12705/661.3
   Bachman S, 2011, ZOOKEYS, P117, DOI 10.3897/zookeys.150.2109
   Bakker ES, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P847, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1502545112
   Barreda VD, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P10989, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1423653112
   Borges L, 2013, S AFR J BOT, V89, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.sajb.2013.07.022
   BOUREAU E, 1983, Bothalia, V14, P355
   Boureau E., 1958, B MUSEUM NATL HIST 2, V2, P321
   Braun D., 2009, LEMURS RARE FORESTS
   BRETELER F.J., 1999, Wageningen Agricultural Papers, V99, P1
   Brodersen CR, 2013, IAWA J, V34, P408, DOI 10.1163/22941932-00000033
   Bruneau A, 2008, BOTANY, V86, P697, DOI 10.1139/B08-058
   Buerki S, 2015, PHILOS T R SOC B, V370, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2014.0014
   Buerki S, 2013, BOT J LINN SOC, V171, P304, DOI 10.1111/boj.12008
   Burkill H.M., 1995, The Useful Plants of West Tropical Africa, V3
   Calviño CI, 2016, J BIOGEOGR, V43, P398, DOI 10.1111/jbi.12651
   CHANDLER M. E. J., 1954, BULL BRIT MUS [NAT HIST] GEOL, V2, P147
   COETZEE JA, 1993, BIOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN AFRICA AND SOUTH AMERICA, P37
   Conway D, 2005, PHILOS T ROY SOC A, V363, P49, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2004.1475
   Corlett R.T., 2011, TROPICAL RAIN FOREST, V2nd
   Couvreur TLP, 2015, PLANT SYST EVOL, V301, P1299, DOI 10.1007/s00606-014-1180-z
   Darriba D, 2012, NAT METHODS, V9, P772, DOI 10.1038/nmeth.2109
   Davies TJ, 2011, PLOS BIOL, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000620
   De Franceschi Dario, 2003, Geodiversitas, V25, P633
   de la Estrella M, 2019, AUST SYST BOT, V32, P564, DOI 10.1071/SB18075
   de La Estrella M, 2019, INT J PLANT SCI, V180, P63, DOI 10.1086/700581
   de la Estrella M, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-24687-3
   de la Estrella M, 2017, NEW PHYTOL, V214, P1722, DOI 10.1111/nph.14523
   de la Estrella M, 2010, SYST BOT, V35, P296, DOI 10.1600/036364410791638414
   Donkpegan ASL, 2017, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V107, P270, DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.11.004
   Donoghue MJ, 2014, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V45, P547, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091905
   Douzery EJP, 1999, AM J BOT, V86, P887, DOI 10.2307/2656709
   Drummond AJ, 2012, MOL BIOL EVOL, V29, P1969, DOI 10.1093/molbev/mss075
   DuPuy D.J., 2002, The Leguminosae of Madagascar
   Edwards EJ, 2010, SCIENCE, V328, P587, DOI 10.1126/science.1177216
   FARRIS JS, 1989, SYST ZOOL, V38, P406, DOI 10.2307/2992406
   Fessler-Vrolant C, 1977, ACT 102 C NAT SOC SA, V1, P143
   Fougère-Danezan M, 2007, SYST BOT, V32, P748, DOI 10.1600/036364407783390755
   Fougère-Danezan M, 2010, ANN BOT-LONDON, V105, P311, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcp280
   Gagnon E, 2015, TAXON, V64, P468, DOI 10.12705/643.6
   Goodman SM, 2005, ORYX, V39, P73, DOI 10.1017/S0030605305000128
   Groom A., 2012, BRANDZEIA FILICIFOLI, DOI [10.2305/IUCN.UK.2012.RLTS, DOI 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2012.RLTS]
   Gurushidze M, 2010, TAXON, V59, P829, DOI 10.1002/tax.593012
   Heywood V., 2018, BGCI IABGS SPECIES R
   Heywood VH, 2019, PLANT DIVERSITY, V41, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.pld.2018.10.001
   Heywood VH, 2017, PLANT DIVERSITY, V39, P314, DOI 10.1016/j.pld.2017.10.004
   Heywood VH, 2016, ISR J PLANT SCI, V63, P211, DOI 10.1080/07929978.2015.1035605
   Jacobs BF, 2004, PHILOS T R SOC B, V359, P1573, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2004.1533
   Jacobs BF, 2004, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V213, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.palaeo.2004.07.007
   Jakob SS, 2006, MOL BIOL EVOL, V23, P1602, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msl018
   Jaozandry J.J., 2005, MAKIRA FOREST CONSER
   Katoh K, 2013, MOL BIOL EVOL, V30, P772, DOI 10.1093/molbev/mst010
   Kearse M, 2012, BIOINFORMATICS, V28, P1647, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199
   Krausel R., 1939, ABHANDLUNGEN BAYERIS, V47, P1
   Lemey P, 2009, PLOS COMPUT BIOL, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000520
   Mackinder B., 2005, LEGUMES WORLD
   Mackinder B., 2006, THESIS, P383
   Mackinder BA., 2011, SYST BOT MONOGR, V91, P1
   Malhi Y, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P838, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1502540113
   Malhi Y, 2013, PHILOS T R SOC B, V368, DOI [10.1098/rstb.2012.0312, 10.1098/rstb.2012.0293]
   Matzke N.J., 2013, THESIS, P1
   Matzke NJ, 2014, SYST BIOL, V63, P951, DOI 10.1093/sysbio/syu056
   Maurin O, 2014, NEW PHYTOL, V204, P201, DOI 10.1111/nph.12936
   Mayaux P, 2013, PHILOS T R SOC B, V368, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2012.0300
   Miller MA, 2010, GAT COMP ENV WORKSH, P1, DOI [10.1109/gce.2010.5676129, DOI 10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129]
   Mitchard ETA, 2013, PHILOS T R SOC B, V368, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2012.0406
   Mittermeier R.A., 2010, Lemurs of Madagascar, V3rd
   Moritz C, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P533, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.533
   Morley R.J., 2000, ORIGIN EVOLUTION TRO, P362
   Nasi R, 2011, INT FOREST REV, V13, P355, DOI 10.1505/146554811798293872
   Parmentier I, 2007, J ECOL, V95, P1058, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01273.x
   Pennington RT, 2016, NEW PHYTOL, V210, P25, DOI 10.1111/nph.13724
   Perrier de la Bathie H., 1936, BIOGEOGRAPHIE PLANTE
   Plana V, 2004, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V359, P1585, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2004.1535
   Pokorny L, 2015, FRONT GENET, V6, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2015.00154
   Pross J, 2012, NATURE, V488, P73, DOI 10.1038/nature11300
   Ree RH, 2008, SYSTEMATIC BIOL, V57, P4, DOI 10.1080/10635150701883881
   Ree RH, 2018, J BIOGEOGR, V45, P741, DOI 10.1111/jbi.13173
   Richards P., 1973, Tropical forest ecosystem in Africa and South America, P21
   Ronquist F, 2003, BIOINFORMATICS, V19, P1572, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
   Ruhfel BR, 2016, AM J BOT, V103, P1117, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1500537
   Särkinen T, 2013, PHYTOKEYS, V31, P1, DOI 10.3897/phytokeys.31.6312
   SALARDCHEBOLDAEFF M, 1979, REV PALAEOBOT PALYNO, V28, P365, DOI 10.1016/0034-6667(79)90032-0
   Sang T, 1997, AM J BOT, V84, P1120, DOI 10.2307/2446155
   Scotese CR, 2004, J GEOL, V112, P729, DOI 10.1086/424867
   Senut B, 2009, CR GEOSCI, V341, P591, DOI 10.1016/j.crte.2009.03.008
   Seward A.C., 1935, GEOL SURVEY EGYPT, V21
   Shaw J, 2005, AM J BOT, V92, P142, DOI 10.3732/ajb.92.1.142
   Simon MF, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P20359, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0903410106
   Stamatakis A, 2014, BIOINFORMATICS, V30, P1312, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033
   SUN Y, 1994, THEOR APPL GENET, V89, P26, DOI 10.1007/BF00226978
   TATE JA, 2002, THESIS
   Terborgh J, 2016, ECOGRAPHY, V39, P187, DOI 10.1111/ecog.01643
   Terborgh J, 2016, ECOGRAPHY, V39, P180, DOI 10.1111/ecog.01641
   Tosso F, 2018, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V120, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.11.026
   Trauth MH, 2009, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V28, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.11.003
   Tutu K, 2009, APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN THE DEVELOPING WORLD, P25, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-9139-1_4
   Wells N.A., 2003, The natural history of Madagascar, P16
   White TJ., 1990, PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications, V18, P315, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
   Wieringa J.J., 1999, WAGENINGEN AGR U PAP, V99-4
   Willis KJ, 2013, PHILOS T R SOC B, V368, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2012.0491
   Wojciechowski MF, 2004, AM J BOT, V91, P1846, DOI 10.3732/ajb.91.11.1846
   WOLFE AD, 1995, SYST BOT, V20, P395, DOI 10.2307/2419800
   Yahara T, 2013, TAXON, V62, P249, DOI 10.12705/622.12
   Zachos J, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P686, DOI 10.1126/science.1059412
NR 115
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 0
U2 28
PU ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
PI SAN DIEGO
PA 525 B ST, STE 1900, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4495 USA
SN 1055-7903
EI 1095-9513
J9 MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL
JI Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.
PD MAY
PY 2020
VL 146
AR 106752
DI 10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106752
PG 11
WC Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Evolutionary Biology; Genetics &
   Heredity
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Evolutionary Biology; Genetics &
   Heredity
GA KU8WB
UT WOS:000519992400009
PM 32028029
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Palik, BJ
   D'Amato, AW
   Slesak, RA
   Kastendick, D
   Looney, C
   Kragthorpe, J
AF Palik, Brian J.
   D'Amato, Anthony W.
   Slesak, Robert A.
   Kastendick, Doug
   Looney, Chris
   Kragthorpe, Josh
TI Eighth-year survival and growth of planted replacement tree species in
   black ash (<i>Fraxinus nigra</i>) wetlands threatened by emerald ash
   borer in Minnesota, USA
SO FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE EAB; Foundational species; Tree regeneration; Silviculture; Assisted
   migration; Enrichment planting
ID NORTHERN MINNESOTA; FORESTS; REGENERATION; MORTALITY; COMMUNITIES;
   BUPRESTIDAE; VEGETATION; RESPONSES; AMERICAN; MICHIGAN
AB Black ash (Fraxinus nigra) is native to lowland forests of the western Great Lakes region, USA, where it often comprises a majority of trees. Like all native ash in North America, black ash is threatened by emerald ash borer (EAB; Agrilus planipennis), but the impacts from EAB mortality may be particularly severe in these forests given the foundational role of black ash at regulating ecosystem function. Compounding the problem is that associated tree species occur in low abundance and their abundance may be further reduced as habitat declines with climate change. These converging threats point to the need for silvicultural intervention to establish replacement tree species in anticipation of EAB invasion. Here we report on a large-scale management experiment from Minnesota, USA that includes different silvicultural approaches for establishing replacement tree species in black ash forests. Specifically, we examined eighth-year survival and growth of planted seedling in treatments that included clearcutting, group selection, uncut forest, and emulation of EAB mortality by girdling black ash. Species included nine that are native to the ecosystem, two from the next southern climate zone, and one exotic species, Manchurian ash (Fraxinus mandshurica). Among species and treatment combinations, survival was highest for American elm (Ulmus americana), averaging around 81% in uncut, group selection, and girdle treatments. Swamp white oak (Quercus bicolor), a species from the next southern climate zone, also had high survival in these treatments (ranging from 61% to 79%). Both species had survival under 60% in the clearcut treatment. Most native southern boreal species, as well as Manchurian ash, had low survival (0% to less than 40%) in most treatments. In the clearcut, girdle, and group selection treatments relative diameter and relative height growth was highest for balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera), averaging, respectively, around 0.25 mm mm(-1) yr(-1) and 0.20 cm cm(-1) yr(-1), followed by swamp white oak and red maple (Acer rubrum). Non-native Manchurian ash had consistently low growth in all treatments compared to other species. All species had low growth rates in the uncut treatment. An integration of survival and diameter growth pointed to group selection as the treatment that provides the best balance between survival and growth. Our results indicate promising survival and growth of at least some replacement species, including several predicted to be future climate-adapted, as well as a silvicultural approach in group selection that is an effective method to regenerate these species.
C1 [Palik, Brian J.; Kastendick, Doug] US Forest Serv, USDA, Northern Res Stn, Grand Rapids, MN 55744 USA.
   [D'Amato, Anthony W.] Univ Vermont, Rubenstein Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Burlington, VT 05405 USA.
   [Slesak, Robert A.] US Forest Serv, USDA, Pacific Northwest Res Stn, Olympia, WA 98512 USA.
   [Looney, Chris] US Forest Serv, USDA, Pacific Southwest Res Stn, Davis, CA 95618 USA.
   [Kragthorpe, Josh] Univ Minnesota, Dept Forest Resources, St Paul, MN 55108 USA.
C3 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); United States Forest
   Service; University of Vermont; United States Department of Agriculture
   (USDA); United States Forest Service; United States Department of
   Agriculture (USDA); United States Forest Service; University of
   Minnesota System; University of Minnesota Twin Cities
RP Palik, BJ (corresponding author), US Forest Serv, USDA, Northern Res Stn, Grand Rapids, MN 55744 USA.
EM brian.palik@usda.gov
RI Looney, Christopher/IUN-6310-2023; D'Amato, Anthony/AAV-3245-2021
OI Palik, Brian/0000-0003-0300-9644; Kastendick,
   Douglas/0000-0003-3916-4558; Looney, Christopher/0000-0002-3645-8406
FU Minnesota Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund; Frederick and
   Philip Noel Knorr and Northwest Paper Foundation Fellowships through the
   University of Minnesota, Department of Forest Resources; USDA Forest
   Service, Northern Research Station and Northeastern Area State and
   Private Forestry; Department of Interior Northeast Climate Adaptation
   Science Center
FX Funding was provided by the Minnesota Environmental and Natural
   Resources Trust Fund to the Legislative Citizens Committee on Minnesota
   Resources; the Frederick and Philip Noel Knorr and Northwest Paper
   Foundation Fellowships through the University of Minnesota, Department
   of Forest Resources; the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station
   and Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry, and the Department of
   Interior Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center. We thank Gary
   Swanson of the Chippewa National Forest for initially suggesting this
   project and the Chippewa National Forest staff who provided logistical
   support. We thank Mitchell Slater, Reid Peterson, John Elioff, and many
   summer field assistants who helped with tree planting and the multi-year
   data collection. Nels Johnson provided statistical consultation on
   survival modeling and reporting results.
CR Abella SR, 2019, BIOL INVASIONS, V21, P3685, DOI 10.1007/s10530-019-02080-z
   [Anonymous], 2020, PLANTS DAT
   [Anonymous], 2015, Northwest Alliance Comput. Sci. Eng
   [Anonymous], 2003, FIELD GUIDE NATIVE P
   Aubin I, 2015, FOREST CHRON, V91, P291, DOI 10.5558/tfc2015-050
   BAKER F. S., 1949, JOUR FOREST, V47, P179
   BARNES BV, 1976, CAN J BOT, V54, P19, DOI 10.1139/b76-004
   Barton K, 2019, MUMIN MULTIMODEL INF
   Bolton N, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9030146
   Bowen AKM, 2018, J TORREY BOT SOC, V145, P41, DOI [10.3159/torrey-d-16-00002.1, 10.3159/TORREY-D-16-00002.1]
   BURDON JJ, 1980, J ECOL, V68, P953, DOI 10.2307/2259467
   Burnham K. P., 2002, BASIC USE INFORM THE, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.1007/B97636
   Burns R.M., 1990, CONIFERS AGR HDB, P654
   Burns R.M., 1990, Silvics of North America, Volume 2, Hardwoods. Agriculture handbook, V2, P654
   D'Amato AW, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9060348
   Davis JC, 2017, CAN J FOREST RES, V47, P319, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0105
   Diamond JS, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V222, P436, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.082
   Ellison AM, 2005, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V3, P479, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0479:LOFSCF]2.0.CO;2
   Grueber CE, 2011, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V24, P699, DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02210.x
   Handler, 2014, USDA FOREST SERVICE
   Hartig F., 2022, R package
   Hoffmann WA, 2002, ANN BOT-LONDON, V90, P37, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcf140
   Hoven BM, 2020, ANN FOREST SCI, V77, DOI 10.1007/s13595-019-0895-y
   Hunt R, 1997, NEW PHYTOL, V135, P395, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00671.x
   Iverson L, 2016, ECOSYSTEMS, V19, P248, DOI 10.1007/s10021-015-9929-y
   Kashian DM, 2011, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V261, P480, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.10.033
   Kim JH, 2010, FOR SCI TECHNOL, V6, P1, DOI 10.1080/21580103.2010.9656351
   Klooster WS, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9050250
   Klooster WS, 2014, BIOL INVASIONS, V16, P859, DOI 10.1007/s10530-013-0543-7
   Kolka RK, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9040179
   Lenth R., 2018, PACKAGE EMMEANS
   Looney CE, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V389, P352, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.12.028
   Looney CE, 2017, CAN J FOREST RES, V47, P183, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0369
   Looney CE, 2015, CAN J FOREST RES, V45, P1728, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2015-0129
   Magnusson A., 2018, glmmTMB: Generalized Linear Mixed Models using Template Model Builder
   Montgomery RA, 2010, ECOLOGY, V91, P3641, DOI 10.1890/09-1663.1
   Nakagawa S, 2013, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V4, P133, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
   Palik B.J., 2021, INT J FOR RES, DOI [10.1093/forestry/cpaa047, DOI 10.1093/FORESTRY/CPAA047]
   Palik BJ, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V269, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.020
   Palik BJ, 2011, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V261, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.09.041
   Pedlar JH, 2012, BIOSCIENCE, V62, P835, DOI 10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.10
   R Core Team, 2018, **DATA OBJECT**
   Rebek EJ, 2008, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V37, P242, DOI 10.1603/0046-225X(2008)37[242:IVIRTE]2.0.CO;2
   Richards W., 2008, AAAI FALL S NAT INSP, P95
   Roberts MR, 2007, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V242, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.043
   Rooney TP, 2002, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V163, P119, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00532-1
   Slavicek J.M., 2012, USDA FOREST SERVICE, P242
   Slesak RA, 2014, CAN J FOREST RES, V44, P961, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0111
   SUGIURA N, 1978, COMMUN STAT A-THEOR, V7, P13, DOI 10.1080/03610927808827599
   Telander AC, 2015, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V206, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.02.019
   Townsend A. M., 2005, Journal of Environmental Horticulture, V23, P21
   Trettin Carl C., 1995, P437
   Van Grinsven MJ, 2017, ECOHYDROLOGY, V10, DOI 10.1002/eco.1862
   Wright A, 2014, ECOLOGY, V95, P2213, DOI 10.1890/13-1855.1
   Youngquist MB, 2020, WETLANDS, V40, P839, DOI 10.1007/s13157-019-01221-3
   Youngquist MB, 2017, WETLANDS, V37, P787, DOI 10.1007/s13157-017-0908-2
   Zhang CY, 2010, ACTA OECOL, V36, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.actao.2009.10.001
   Zuur Alain F., 2009, P1
NR 58
TC 16
Z9 18
U1 6
U2 42
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0378-1127
EI 1872-7042
J9 FOREST ECOL MANAG
JI For. Ecol. Manage.
PD MAR 15
PY 2021
VL 484
AR 118958
DI 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.118958
EA JAN 2021
PG 12
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA QH0AH
UT WOS:000617940200002
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Fand, BB
   Tonnang, HEZ
   Kumar, M
   Bal, SK
   Singh, NP
   Rao, DVKN
   Kamble, AL
   Nangare, DD
   Minhas, PS
AF Fand, Babasaheb B.
   Tonnang, Henri E. Z.
   Kumar, Mahesh
   Bal, Santanu K.
   Singh, Naveen P.
   Rao, D. V. K. N.
   Kamble, Ankush L.
   Nangare, Dhananjay D.
   Minhas, Paramjit S.
TI Predicting the impact of climate change on regional and seasonal
   abundance of the mealybug <i>Phenacoccus solenopsis</i> Tinsley
   (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) using temperature-driven phenology model
   linked to GIS
SO ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
LA English
DT Article
DE Abiotic stresses; Climate adaptation planning; Invasive pests; Pest
   forecasting models; Policy measures; Risk mapping
ID COTTON MEALYBUG; HOST PLANTS; POPULATION; PAKISTAN; PUNJAB; PESTS; INDIA
AB The mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) is a highly invasive and polyphagous pest of global incidence. The fundamental hypothesis of the present study was that the temperature variations due to global climate change may affect seriously the future distribution and abundance of P. solenopsis, which might further aggravate the crop yield losses. We employed a temperature-based phenology model of P. solenopsis in a geographic information system for mapping population growth potentials of P. solenopsis. The three risk indices viz., establishment risk index, generation index and activity index were computed using interpolated temperature data from worldclim database for current (2000) and future (2050) climatic conditions. The daily minimum and maximum temperature data from four selected weather stations in India were used for analysing within-year variation of pest population. A linear relationship was established between the activity indices and yield losses at various locations reported in literatures for predicting the future trend of yield loss due to climate change. The results revealed that, under current temperature conditions P. solenopsis can complete >4.0 generations per year on similar to 80% of the global cotton production areas. Economic losses are likely to occur in areas where at least 8.0 generations can develop in a year; under current climate similar to 40% areas fall under this category. The increased geographical suitability at higher latitudes in cotton production areas, additional 2.0 generations per year, and 4.0 fold increase of population abundance of P. solenopsis are expected in tropical and sub-tropical cotton areas of Brazil, South Africa, Pakistan and India due to predicted climate change. Analysis of within year population increase at various selected locations in India revealed that, P. solenopsis attained maximum potential population increase during the major cotton growing season (May-June to October-November). On the other hand, the innate ability of P. solenopsis population to increase reduced considerably during off season and cooler winter months. The increased pest activity of P. solenopsis due to climate change may intensify the losses in cotton yield, with forecasted losses in India to increase from existing losses of million US$ 1217.10 to future losses of million US$ 1764.85 by the year 2050. Here, we illustrate the possible impact of climate change on future P. solettopsis exacerbation based on temperature-driven population studies, which will help in undertaking agro-ecoregion specific management strategies. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Fand, Babasaheb B.; Kumar, Mahesh; Bal, Santanu K.; Singh, Naveen P.; Rao, D. V. K. N.; Kamble, Ankush L.; Nangare, Dhananjay D.; Minhas, Paramjit S.] Indian Council Agr Res, Natl Inst Abiot Stress Management, Pune 413115, Maharashtra, India.
   [Tonnang, Henri E. Z.] Int Ctr Insect Physiol & Ecol, Nairobi, Kenya.
C3 Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR); ICAR - National
   Institute of Abiotic Stress Management; International Centre of Insect
   Physiology & Ecology (ICIPE)
RP Fand, BB (corresponding author), Indian Council Agr Res, Natl Inst Abiot Stress Management, Pune 413115, Maharashtra, India.
EM babasahebfand@gmail.com
RI Minhas, P.S./F-6061-2012; Fand, Babasaheb/AAF-9417-2020; TONNANG,
   Henri/AAQ-2206-2021
OI TONNANG, Henri/0000-0002-9424-9186; Minhas, Paramjit
   Singh/0000-0002-2108-6048
FU National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management (NIASM), Baramati, Pune,
   Maharashtra (India) [Code-IXX08575]
FX This study is a part of the research project "Abiotic stresses affecting
   crop-insect pest interactions in the context of global climate change
   (Project Code-IXX08575)" of School of Atmospheric Stress Management,
   National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management (NIASM), Baramati, Pune,
   Maharashtra (India). The authors gratefully acknowledge the Director,
   NIASM for providing all the necessary facilities and extending his
   cooperation and support to carry out present investigations. We are
   grateful to the Heads of the Department of Agrometeorology of Punjab
   Agricultural University, Ludhiana (Punjab), Choudhary Charan Singh
   Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (Haryana), Junagadh Agricultural
   University, Junagadh (Gujarat) and Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi
   Vidyapeeth, Akola (Maharashtra) for providing daily temperature data
   required for per point simulations. We would also like to place on
   record Dr. Jawoo Koo, a Senior Research Staff, International Food Policy
   Research Institute, Washington, DC for providing shape file of global
   cotton production areas. We also thank anonymous reviewers for their
   critically evaluation of our manuscript and valuable suggestions for its
   further improvement.
CR Abbas Ghulam, 2005, Pakistan Entomologist, V27, P83
   Akintola A. J., 2008, Agricultural Journal, V3, P1, DOI 10.3923/ijar.2008.1.26
   [Anonymous], 1 CIAT
   Arif MI, 2009, INT J AGRIC BIOL, V11, P163
   Arif MI, 2012, INT J AGRIC BIOL, V14, P557
   Bale JS, 2010, J EXP BIOL, V213, P980, DOI 10.1242/jeb.037911
   Bambawale O.M., 2008, NCEIP newsletter, India, V14, P1
   Ben-Dov Y., 1994, A systematic catalogue of the mealybugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geographical distribution, host plants, biology and economic importance.
   Ben-Dov Y., 2009, SCALENET PHENACOCCUS
   CAIR, 2007, MEAL COTT CROPS WORS, P81
   CICR, 2012, COTT DAT
   Culik MP, 2005, ZOOTAXA, P1
   CURRY GL, 1978, THEOR POPUL BIOL, V13, P197, DOI 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90042-4
   de Willihk M.C . Grahara., 2003, Revista de la Sociedad Entomologica Argentina, V62, P80
   Desai H.R., 2011, P CUM WORLD COTT RES, P138
   Deshpande V., 2009, CROP CARE, V35, P81
   Dhawan A.K., 2007, Ind. J. Eco, V34, P110, DOI [10.1673/031.013.13701, DOI 10.1673/031.013.13701]
   Fand B.B., 2012, P 4 NAT S PLANT PROT, P37
   Fand BB, 2014, CROP PROT, V55, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.cropro.2013.10.020
   Goswami B., 2007, Bt cotton devastated by secondary pests
   Hanchinal S.G., 2010, THESIS U AGR SCI DHA, P126
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   Hodgson C, 2008, ZOOTAXA, P1
   Jhala R. C., 2008, Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology, V28, P403
   Kroschel J, 2013, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V170, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.06.017
   Kumar Rishi, 2013, PHYTOPARASITICA, DOI 101007/s12600-013-0361-6
   Lal M, 2001, CURR SCI INDIA, V81, P1196
   Mahmood R., 2011, P 5 M ICACS AS COTT
   Miller DR, 2005, FLA ENTOMOL, V88, P482, DOI 10.1653/0015-4040(2005)88[482:SSIGHC]2.0.CO;2
   Nagrare VS, 2009, B ENTOMOL RES, V99, P537, DOI 10.1017/S0007485308006573
   Nauen R, 2007, PEST MANAG SCI, V63, P628, DOI 10.1002/ps.1406
   Oerke EC, 2006, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V144, P31, DOI 10.1017/S0021859605005708
   [Parry M.L. IPCC IPCC], 2007, Climate Change: Impacts, Adaption and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernamental Panel on Climate Change
   PORTER JH, 1991, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V57, P221, DOI 10.1016/0168-1923(91)90088-8
   Prishanthini M., 2009, PHENOCOCCUS SOLENOPI
   Robinson P, 2010, MEALYBUG TURMOIL SPA
   Sharma O. P., 2008, Indian Journal of Plant Protection, V36, P186
   Shouq K., 2007, WORLD TRADE REV, V22, P13
   Suresh S., 2010, Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, V23, P6
   Tanwar R.K., 2007, TECHNICAL BULLETIN N, V19
   Tonnang EZH., 2013, ILCYM INSECT LIFE CY, P193
   Vennila S., 2010, TEC B NATL CTR INTEG, V24, P1
   WAGNER TL, 1984, ANN ENTOMOL SOC AM, V77, P475, DOI 10.1093/aesa/77.5.475
   Wang YP, 2010, AGR FOREST ENTOMOL, V12, P403, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2010.00490.x
   Ward NL, 2007, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V13, P1605, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01399.x
   Williams D. J., 1992, Mealybugs of Central and South America.
   Yamamura K, 1998, APPL ENTOMOL ZOOL, V33, P289, DOI 10.1303/aez.33.289
   You L., 2000, SPATIAL PRODUCTION A
NR 48
TC 48
Z9 53
U1 1
U2 112
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
PI AMSTERDAM
PA PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0304-3800
EI 1872-7026
J9 ECOL MODEL
JI Ecol. Model.
PD SEP 24
PY 2014
VL 288
BP 62
EP 78
DI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.05.018
PG 17
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA AN1CO
UT WOS:000340320500007
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Oladipo, S
   Quesada-Ruiz, LC
   Caparros-Santiago, JA
AF Oladipo, Seun
   Quesada-Ruiz, Lorenzo C.
   Caparros-Santiago, Jose A.
TI Methodology for selecting potential CO2 2 sinks in Macaronesia: The case
   of Gran Canaria
SO TREES FORESTS AND PEOPLE
LA English
DT Article
DE GHG emissions; GIS; Afforestation; Reforestation; Land suitability
   analysis; Gran Canaria
ID LAND-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; URBAN;
   TOURISM; AREAS
AB Carbon dioxide (CO2) 2 ) accounts for 80% of the greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere. One of the several ways to mitigate CO2 2 emissions is through afforestation, which prevents catastrophic environmental consequences. The mean average emission per tourist in the Canary Islands on their way to the islands is 0.48 Tn. Like most urban cities, the island of Gran Canaria faces the problem of CO2 2 emissions due to anthropogenic and human activities. Vegetation coverage significantly influences the distribution of temperature. The correlation between Land Surface Temperature (LST) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) of Gran Canaria, using satellite images from Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2, revealed a strong inverse relationship within all land use types, with an R2 value of 0.39. Land suitability analysis is a prerequisite for optimum utilization of available land resources. This study developed a suitability map for afforestation based on land use land cover, topographic, meteorologic, and socio-economic factors. Eight factors, including distance from settlements, land use, distance from the road, distance from water, elevation, slope, precipitation, and temperature, were employed according to previous studies, expert consultation, and land suitability mapping experience. After the criteria decision and data acquisition, maps of each criterion were created and transformed using the Suitability Modeler of ArcGIS Pro. The current study results show that 87% of the total area is suitable for afforestation and reforestation projects in Gran Canaria. Instead of using reactive methods to lessen the effects, the study recommends a proactive approach to climate adaptation through nature-based solutions. The study is part of an umbrella project of the Canary Islands and Spain in general, which considers the contributions of local and institutional stakeholders at different stages of the project. The next stage will be to design a forest afforestation and reforestation project, considering the kind of tree species needed, the methods required to implement it, and the management guidelines about the initial years of installation and growth of the new trees. The most crucial technical choice is which forest species to choose, as it will determine the success of the reforestation effort. The new revegetated space's ability to sequester carbon dioxide will primarily rely on the productivity of the land used for forest reforestation, the species chosen, and the introduced planting density.
C1 [Oladipo, Seun] Univ Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
   [Quesada-Ruiz, Lorenzo C.] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Geog, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain.
   [Caparros-Santiago, Jose A.] Univ Seville, Dept Phys Geog & Reg Geog Anal, Seville 41004, Spain.
C3 University of Groningen; Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria;
   University of Sevilla
RP Oladipo, S (corresponding author), Univ Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
EM seunoladipo7@gmail.com
RI Santiago, Jose/AAF-9580-2021; Oladipo, Seun/IQU-1057-2023
OI Oladipo, Seun/0000-0002-5822-4475
CR Abeydeera LHUW, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11143972
   Apud A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12229683
   Barrutiabengoa J.M., 2024, From national to sectoral perspective: a comprehensive analysis of GHG emissions in Spain
   Caparros-Santiago JA, 2023, ECOL INFORM, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102239
   Carrillo J, 2022, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V22, DOI 10.1007/s10113-022-01880-9
   Chen L, 2022, ENVIRON CHEM LETT, V20, P2277, DOI 10.1007/s10311-022-01435-8
   City Hall Las Palmas, 2024, Plan de acccion, agenda Urbana Espanola, red municipal de sumideros de carbono basados en la forestacion urbana y periurbana
   Collins MG, 2001, ENVIRON MANAGE, V28, P611, DOI 10.1007/s002670010247
   Cueva J, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103903
   De Jong BHJ, 2000, ECOL ECON, V33, P313, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00162-7
   Demuzere M, 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V146, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025
   European Environment Agency, 2024, EEA greenhouse gases-data viewer
   Fernandez-Palacios JM, 2010, TERRESTRIAL ARTHROPO, P11
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Friedlingstein P, 2019, SCIENCE, V366, DOI 10.1126/science.aay8060
   Gelan E., 2021, Environmental Systems Research, V10, P1, DOI [10.1186/s40068-021-00220-w, DOI 10.1186/S40068-021-00220-W]
   Gobierno de Canarias, 2023, Technical Report
   Gorgani S., 2013, The Relationship between NDVI and LST in the Urban Area Of Mashhad
   Government of Las Palmas, 2023, Municipal network of carbon sinks based on urban and peri-urban forestry.
   Hobohm C, 2000, FLORA, V195, P9
   Inchausti-Sintes F, 2020, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V28, P394, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2019.1677677
   INE, 2023, Environmental accounts. Air Emission Accounts. Preview 2022 and year 2021.
   INE, 2018, Environmental accounts. Air Emission Accounts. Preview 2017 and year 2016.
   Jahn R., 2006, Guidelines for soil description
   Kinnunen A, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104027
   Lal R., 2007, Climate Change and Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration in Central Asia, P475
   Liu CH, 2010, AFR J BUS MANAGE, V4, P1529
   Lo CP, 1997, INT J REMOTE SENS, V18, P287, DOI 10.1080/014311697219079
   MacKinnon K., 2008, Biodiversity, climate change, and adaptation: nature-based solutions from the world bank portfolio, P1
   Malhi GS, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13031318
   Linh NHK, 2022, CLIMATE, V10, DOI 10.3390/cli10060082
   Nguyen T.T.M., 2021, Current Urban Studies, V9, P376, DOI [10.4236/cus.2021.93023, DOI 10.4236/CUS.2021.93023]
   Nieder R., 2018, Soil components and human health, P223, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-1222-2_5
   López EP, 2006, PASOS, V4, P85
   Richards KR, 2004, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V63, P1, DOI 10.1023/B:CLIM.0000018503.10080.89
   Santos-Guerra A, 1983, Vegetacion y flora de La Palma
   Sathaye J, 2006, CURR SCI INDIA, V90, P314
   UNECE, 2021, Sustainable Urban and Peri-Urban Forestry: An Integrative and Inclusive Nature-Based Solution for Green Recovery and Sustainable, Healthy and Resilient Cities. Policy Brief
   Ustaoglu E, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126542
   Voigt C, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P3121, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13563
   Weng QH, 2004, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V89, P467, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.005
   WOODWELL GM, 1978, SCIENCE, V199, P141, DOI 10.1126/science.199.4325.141
   Wright B., 2012, Duke Forum for Law Social Change (DFLSC), V4, P1
   Yue W, 2007, INT J REMOTE SENS, V28, P3205, DOI 10.1080/01431160500306906
NR 44
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
EI 2666-7193
J9 TREES FOREST PEOPLE
JI Trees For. People
PD DEC
PY 2024
VL 18
AR 100698
DI 10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100698
PG 13
WC Forestry
WE Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
SC Forestry
GA J7F6G
UT WOS:001338687100001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Quaglia, E
   Ravetto Enri, S
   Perotti, E
   Probo, M
   Lombardi, G
   Lonati, M
AF Quaglia, Elena
   Ravetto Enri, Simone
   Perotti, Elisa
   Probo, Massimiliano
   Lombardi, Giampiero
   Lonati, Michele
TI Alpine tundra species phenology is mostly driven by climate-related
   variables rather than by photoperiod
SO JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Alpine plants; Climate change; Growing degree days; Italian Alps; Salix
   herbacea; Snowbed vegetation
ID FLOWERING PHENOLOGY; SNOW REMOVAL; RESPONSES; SOIL; TEMPERATURE; TIME;
   VARIABILITY; COMMUNITY; PLATEAU; DENSITY
AB The study of plant phenology has frequently been used to link phenological events to various factors, such as temperature or photoperiod. In the high-alpine environment, proper timing of the phenological cycle has always been crucial to overcome harsh conditions and potential extreme events (i.e. spring frosts) but little is known about the response dynamics of the vegetation, which could shape the alpine landscape in a future of changing climate. Alpine tundra vegetation is composed by an array of species belonging to different phytosociological optima and with various survival strategies, and snowbed communities are a relevant expression of such an extreme-climate adapted flora. We set eight permanent plots with each one in a snowbed located on the Cimalegna plateau in Northwestern Italy and then we selected 10 most recurring species among our plots, all typical of the alpine tundra environment and classified in 3 different pools: snowbed specialists, grassland species and rocky debris species. For 3 years we registered the phenophases of each species during the whole growing season using an adaptation of the BBCH scale. We later focused on the three most biologically relevant phenophases, i.e., flower buds visible, full flowering, and beginning of seed dispersion. Three important season-related variables were chosen to investigate their relationship with the phenological cycle of the studied species: (i) the Day Of Year (DOY), the progressive number of days starting from the 1(st)of January, used as a proxy of photoperiod, (ii) Days From Snow Melt (DFSM), selected to include the relevance of the snow dynamics, and (iii) Growing Degree Days (GDD), computed as a thermal sum. Our analysis highlighted that phenological development correlated better with DFSM and GDD than with DOY. Indeed, models showed that DOY was always a worse predictor since it failed to overcome interannual variations, while DFSM and marginally GDD were better suited to predict the phenological development of most of the species, despite differences in temperature and snowmelt date among the three years. Even if the response pattern to the three variables was mainly consistent for all the species, the timing of their phenological response was different. Indeed, species such asSalix herbaceaandRanunculus glacialiswere always earlier in the achievement of the phenophases, whileAgrostis rupestrisandEuphrasia minimadeveloped later and the remaining species showed an intermediate behavior. However, we did not detect significant differences among the three functional pools of species.
C1 [Quaglia, Elena; Ravetto Enri, Simone; Lombardi, Giampiero; Lonati, Michele] Univ Torino, Dept Agr Forest & Food Sci, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, I-10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy.
   [Perotti, Elisa; Probo, Massimiliano] Agroscope, Grazing Syst, Route Duillier 50, CH-1260 Nyon, Switzerland.
C3 University of Turin; Swiss Federal Research Station Agroscope
RP Quaglia, E (corresponding author), Univ Torino, Dept Agr Forest & Food Sci, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, I-10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy.
EM elena.quaglia@unito.it; simone.ravettoenri@unito.it;
   elisa.perotti@agroscope.admin.ch; massimiliano.probo@agroscope.admin.ch;
   giampiero.lombardi@unito.it; michele.lonati@unito.it
RI Ravetto Enri, Simone/ABC-4852-2021; Lonati, Michele/HJH-1916-2023;
   Lombardi, Giampiero/G-3714-2012
OI Quaglia, Elena/0000-0001-9087-3152; Lonati, Michele/0000-0001-8886-0328;
   Perotti, Elisa/0000-0002-6277-4410; Probo,
   Massimiliano/0000-0002-0017-7557; Lombardi,
   Giampiero/0000-0003-3787-2374; RAVETTO ENRI, SIMONE/0000-0002-3584-8031
FU MonteRosa2000 s.p.a.; Universita degli Studi di Torino
FX We thank prof. Pier Giorgio Montarolo, director of Istituto Angelo
   Mosso, which was a fundamental operating base for our fieldwork. This
   study was funded by MonteRosa2000 s.p.a., which we thank for supporting
   the monitoring project throughout its course. Open Access funding
   provided by Universita degli Studi di Torino within the CRUICARE
   Agreement.
CR [Anonymous], 2004, Flora Alpina
   Beerling DJ, 1998, J ECOL, V86, P872, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.8650872.x
   Björk RG, 2007, ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES, V39, P34, DOI 10.1657/1523-0430(2007)39[34:EOASAT]2.0.CO;2
   Carbognani M, 2016, OECOLOGIA, V182, P573, DOI 10.1007/s00442-016-3669-3
   Carbognani M, 2014, ALPINE BOT, V124, P105, DOI 10.1007/s00035-014-0135-x
   Carbognani M, 2012, ACTA OECOL, V43, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.actao.2012.06.003
   Ding MJ, 2016, J MT SCI-ENGL, V13, P83, DOI 10.1007/s11629-015-3600-0
   Ernakovich JG, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P3256, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12568
   Filippa G, 2015, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V59, P1927, DOI 10.1007/s00484-015-0999-5
   Freppaz M, 2008, J PLANT NUTR SOIL SC, V171, P672, DOI 10.1002/jpln.200700278
   Freppaz M, 2010, ENVIRON RES ADV, P81
   Gugger S, 2015, ANN BOT-LONDON, V116, P953, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcv155
   Hack H., 1992, Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes, V44, P265
   Heegaard E, 2004, OECOLOGIA, V139, P459, DOI 10.1007/s00442-004-1523-5
   Hereford J, 2017, J ECOL, V105, P1323, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12739
   Huelber K, 2006, ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES, V38, P99, DOI 10.1657/1523-0430(2006)038[0099:PROSST]2.0.CO;2
   Hülber K, 2011, PERSPECT PLANT ECOL, V13, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.ppees.2011.01.001
   Hülber K, 2010, FUNCT ECOL, V24, P245, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01645.x
   Inouye DW, 2008, ECOLOGY, V89, P353, DOI 10.1890/06-2128.1
   ISARD SA, 1986, ARCTIC ALPINE RES, V18, P83, DOI 10.2307/1551216
   Kawai Y, 2011, BOTANY, V89, P361, DOI [10.1139/B11-024, 10.1139/b11-024]
   Keller F, 2003, ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES, V35, P361, DOI 10.1657/1523-0430(2003)035[0361:TROPIA]2.0.CO;2
   Kimball KD, 2014, AM J BOT, V101, P1437, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1400214
   Klein G, 2018, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V62, P1755, DOI 10.1007/s00484-018-1578-3
   Komac B, 2015, PLANT ECOL, V216, P1257, DOI 10.1007/s11258-015-0506-4
   Korner C., 2003, Alpine Plant Life Internet, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-18970-8
   KUDO G., 1999, Polar Bioscience, V12, P100
   Landolt E., 2010, Flora indicativa: Ecological Indicator Values and Biological Attributes of the Flora of Switzerland and the Alps
   Larl I, 2006, PLANT BIOLOGY, V8, P155, DOI 10.1055/s-2005-872888
   Lessard-Therrien M, 2014, BOTANY, V92, P749, DOI 10.1139/cjb-2014-0026
   Lonati M, 2009, NEW ZEAL J AGR RES, V52, P17, DOI 10.1080/00288230909510485
   LTER Italia, 2020, LONG TERM ECOLOGICAL
   Magnani A, 2017, ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES, V49, P227, DOI 10.1657/AAAR0016-037
   Mulder CPH, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P801, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13386
   Ninot JM, 2013, FOLIA GEOBOT, V48, P23, DOI 10.1007/s12224-012-9138-9
   Olsson Lennart., 2019, Research Handbook on Climate Change and Agricultural Law, P1
   Onipchenko VG, 1998, J VEG SCI, V9, P27, DOI 10.2307/3237220
   Petraglia A, 2014, PLANT ECOL, V215, P759, DOI 10.1007/s11258-014-0368-1
   Portner H.-O., 2019, IPCC SPECIAL REPORT, DOI [10.1017/9781009157964, DOI 10.1017/9781009157964]
   Richardson BA, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P2499, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13532
   Rixen C, 2008, ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES, V40, P568, DOI 10.1657/1523-0430(07-044)[RIXEN]2.0.CO;2
   Rosa RK, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P4520, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13040
   Schmid SF, 2017, BASIC APPL ECOL, V21, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2017.05.003
   Sedlacek J, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0122395
   Steltzer H, 2009, SCIENCE, V324, P886, DOI 10.1126/science.1171542
   Totland O, 2002, OECOLOGIA, V133, P168, DOI 10.1007/s00442-002-1028-z
   Wang H, 2016, J MT SCI-ENGL, V13, P844, DOI 10.1007/s11629-015-3465-2
   WIJK S, 1986, J ECOL, V74, P675, DOI 10.2307/2260390
   Wipf S, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V94, P105, DOI [10.1007/s10584-009-9546-x, 10.1007/s10584-009-9546-X]
NR 49
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 3
U2 23
PU SCIENCE PRESS
PI BEIJING
PA 16 DONGHUANGCHENGGEN NORTH ST, BEIJING 100717, PEOPLES R CHINA
SN 1672-6316
EI 1993-0321
J9 J MT SCI-ENGL
JI J Mt. Sci.
PD SEP
PY 2020
VL 17
IS 9
BP 2081
EP 2096
DI 10.1007/s11629-020-6079-2
EA AUG 2020
PG 16
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA NQ9NX
UT WOS:000561276200001
OA hybrid, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Smalås, A
   Strom, JF
   Amundsen, PA
   Dieckmann, U
   Primicerio, R
AF Smalas, Aslak
   Strom, John F.
   Amundsen, Per-Arne
   Dieckmann, Ulf
   Primicerio, Raul
TI Climate warming is predicted to enhance the negative effects of
   harvesting on high-latitude lake fish
SO JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE age and size truncation; Arctic charr; climate change; ecological
   modelling; management of freshwater fish; population dynamics;
   salmonids; size-selective fishing
ID SALVELINUS-ALPINUS L.; COD GADUS-MORHUA; ARCTIC CHARR; FRESH-WATER;
   NATURAL MORTALITY; REACTION NORMS; GROWTH-PERFORMANCE; FOOD-CONSUMPTION;
   BROWN TROUT; EGG SIZE
AB Ecosystems at high latitudes are exposed to some of the highest rates of climate warming on earth, and freshwater ecosystems in those regions are already experiencing extended ice-free seasons and warmer waters. The dominant fish species in these ecosystems are cold-water salmonids, which play a central ecological role in lake ecosystems, where they are often exposed to size-selective fisheries that truncate their size and age distributions, making them potentially vulnerable to exploitation and environmental perturbations. Here, we address the combined effects of climate-induced water temperature increase (using regionally downscaled climate models based on the RCP-4.5 and RCP-8.5 climate scenarios together with an air-to-water temperature model) and gillnet harvesting, over the period from 1950 to 2100, on the somatic growth, demography and vulnerability of Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus (L.), using an eco-genetic individual-based model. The model captures successive annual life-history events, including the key processes of size-dependent mortality, age- and size-dependent maturation described by a probabilistic reaction norm, temperature-dependent growth, size-dependent reproduction and density-dependent recruitment. Our model predicts that higher water temperatures will increase the somatic growth of Arctic charr, leading to larger body size at age and increased stock biomass: for RCP-8.5, we predict an 80% increase in stock biomass in the year 2100 relative to the year 2000 in the absence of fishing. Interestingly, this potential increase in biomass in future climate scenarios will be partially masked by harvesting: for a fishing mortality of 0.3 year(-1), we predict a mere 40% increase in stock biomass in 2100 relative to 2000. Despite the predicted increase in stock biomass, yield will increase substantially only when fishing mortality is low. In addition, climate warming will accentuate the age-truncation effect of harvesting, which will target younger individuals, including immatures, thus elevating the vulnerability of the population to environmental perturbations. Synthesis and applications. Our model-based analyses highlight the combined effects of climate change and size-selective fishing, emphasizing the emerging vulnerability of fish populations to multiple stressors. We recommend carefully climate-adapted management strategies permitting only a narrow range of gillnet mesh sizes for inland fisheries at high latitudes.
C1 [Smalas, Aslak; Strom, John F.; Amundsen, Per-Arne; Primicerio, Raul] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Fac Biosci Fisheries & Econ, Tromso, Norway.
   [Dieckmann, Ulf] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Evolut & Ecol Program, Laxenburg, Austria.
   [Dieckmann, Ulf] Grad Univ Adv Studies Sokendai, Dept Evolutionary Studies Biosyst, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan.
C3 UiT The Arctic University of Tromso; International Institute for Applied
   Systems Analysis (IIASA); Graduate University for Advanced Studies -
   Japan
RP Smalås, A (corresponding author), UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Fac Biosci Fisheries & Econ, Tromso, Norway.
EM aslak.smalas@uit.no
RI Strøm, John Fredrik/GZG-2004-2022; Dieckmann, Ulf/E-1424-2011
OI Smalas, Aslak/0000-0002-6316-2811; Amundsen,
   Per-Arne/0000-0002-2203-8216; Strom, John Fredrik/0000-0002-9456-3976;
   Dieckmann, Ulf/0000-0001-7089-0393
FU UiT-The Arctic University of Norway; EU-H2020 project ClimeFish
   [677039]; EU-H2020 project COMFORT [820989]
FX Thanks are due to the Freshwater Ecology Group at UiT-The Arctic
   University of Norway, for collecting and sharing their long-term time
   series from Lake Takvatn. Thanks are also due to Prof. Malcolm Jobling
   for thorough and helpful revisions of earlier versions of the
   manuscript. A.S. was supported by UiT-The Arctic University of Norway.
   A.S. and R.P. acknowledge funding by the EU-H2020 project ClimeFish
   (project ID 677039). U.D. acknowledges funding by the EU-H2020 project
   COMFORT (project ID 820989). No conflict of interest are to be reported.
CR Allan JD, 2005, BIOSCIENCE, V55, P1041, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[1041:OOIW]2.0.CO;2
   Amundsen PA, 2007, J ANIM ECOL, V76, P149, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01179.x
   Amundsen PA, 2019, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V64, pS11, DOI 10.1002/lno.10951
   Anderson CNK, 2008, NATURE, V452, P835, DOI 10.1038/nature06851
   [Anonymous], 1990, ECOLOGY TELEOST FISH, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-0829-1
   [Anonymous], 2014, AED Report #26
   Barot S, 2004, EVOL ECOL RES, V6, P659
   Beniston M, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V81, P71, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9226-z
   Berkeley SA, 2004, FISHERIES, V29, P23, DOI 10.1577/1548-8446(2004)29[23:FSVPOA]2.0.CO;2
   Blanchet MA, 2019, FISH RES, V209, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2018.09.004
   Bobko SJ, 2004, FISH B-NOAA, V102, P418
   Brander KM, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P19709, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0702059104
   Bryndum-Buchholz A, 2019, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V25, P459, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14512
   CHEN Y, 1992, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V49, P1228, DOI 10.1139/f92-138
   Conover DO, 2002, SCIENCE, V297, P94, DOI 10.1126/science.1074085
   Deutsch CA, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P6668, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0709472105
   Dieckmann U, 2007, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V335, P253, DOI 10.3354/meps335253
   Dunlop ES, 2009, ECOL APPL, V19, P1815, DOI 10.1890/08-1404.1
   ELLIOTT JM, 1993, FISH RES, V17, P123, DOI 10.1016/0165-7836(93)90012-V
   Enberg K, 2009, EVOL APPL, V2, P394, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00077.x
   FABENS AJ, 1965, GROWTH, V29, P265
   Fenberg PB, 2008, MOL ECOL, V17, P209, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03522.x
   Ficke AD, 2007, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V17, P581, DOI 10.1007/s11160-007-9059-5
   Finstad AG, 2001, ECOL FRESHW FISH, V10, P220, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0633.2001.100404.x
   Folt CL, 1999, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V44, P864, DOI 10.4319/lo.1999.44.3_part_2.0864
   Gislason H, 2010, FISH FISH, V11, P149, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2009.00350.x
   Haddon M., 2011, MODELLING QUANTITATI, V2nd
   Hansen MJ, 1997, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V54, P2483, DOI 10.1139/cjfas-54-11-2483
   Hawley KL, 2017, BIOL LETTERS, V13, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0575
   Hein CL, 2012, AMBIO, V41, P303, DOI 10.1007/s13280-012-0308-z
   Heino M, 2002, EVOLUTION, V56, P669, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01378.x
   Heino M, 2002, B MAR SCI, V70, P639
   Henriksen EH, 2019, J APPL ECOL, V56, P1482, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.13369
   Hsieh CH, 2010, AQUAT SCI, V72, P165, DOI 10.1007/s00027-009-0122-2
   Jeppesen E, 2012, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V694, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10750-012-1182-1
   Jorgensen C, 2007, SCIENCE, V318, P1247, DOI 10.1126/science.1148089
   Karlsson J, 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V11, P710, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00945.x
   Klemetsen A, 2003, ECOL FRESHW FISH, V12, P1, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0633.2003.00010.x
   Klemetsen Anders, 2010, Freshwater Reviews, V3, P49, DOI 10.1608/FRJ-3.1.3
   Larsson S, 2005, J THERM BIOL, V30, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2004.06.001
   Larsson S, 2005, FRESHWATER BIOL, V50, P353, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01326.x
   Larsson S, 1998, J FISH BIOL, V52, P230, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb00795.x
   Lasne E, 2018, EVOL BIOL, V45, P105, DOI 10.1007/s11692-017-9433-8
   Law R, 2000, ICES J MAR SCI, V57, P659, DOI 10.1006/jmsc.2000.0731
   Leblanc CAL, 2011, ETHOLOGY, V117, P664, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01920.x
   Lindenmayer DB, 2010, BIOL CONSERV, V143, P1317, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.02.013
   Longhurst A, 2006, FISH RES, V81, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2006.06.022
   Marteinsdottir G, 1998, J FISH BIOL, V52, P1241, DOI 10.1006/jfbi.1998.0670
   Morgan IJ, 2001, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V7, P345, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00424.x
   Morrissey-McCaffrey E, 2019, J FISH BIOL, V94, P5, DOI 10.1111/jfb.13837
   Ohlberger J, 2013, FUNCT ECOL, V27, P991, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12098
   Olden JD, 2007, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V16, P694, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00337.x
   Olden JD, 2010, DIVERS DISTRIB, V16, P496, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00655.x
   Olsen E, 2005, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V62, P811, DOI 10.1139/F05-065
   Parmesan C, 2006, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V37, P637, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
   PAULY D, 1980, J CONSEIL, V39, P175
   Persson L, 2007, SCIENCE, V316, P1743, DOI 10.1126/science.1141412
   Pörtner HO, 2001, CONT SHELF RES, V21, P1975, DOI 10.1016/S0278-4343(01)00038-3
   Post JR, 2008, ECOL APPL, V18, P1038, DOI 10.1890/07-0465.1
   Quince C, 2008, J THEOR BIOL, V254, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.05.030
   Reist JD, 2006, AMBIO, V35, P381, DOI 10.1579/0044-7447(2006)35[381:AOOEOC]2.0.CO;2
   Siikavuopio SI, 2013, AQUAC RES, V44, P995, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2012.03112.x
   Siikavuopio SI, 2010, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V650, P255, DOI 10.1007/s10750-010-0192-0
   Siikavuopio SI, 2009, AQUACULT ENG, V41, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2009.06.006
   Solomon S., 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007, V4
   Statskog, 2017, FISK TROMS
   Symons CC, 2019, OECOLOGIA, V189, P231, DOI 10.1007/s00442-018-4298-9
   Van Nes EH, 2005, ECOL MODEL, V185, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.12.001
   Woodward G, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P2093, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0055
NR 69
TC 13
Z9 14
U1 2
U2 39
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0021-8901
EI 1365-2664
J9 J APPL ECOL
JI J. Appl. Ecol.
PD FEB
PY 2020
VL 57
IS 2
BP 270
EP 282
DI 10.1111/1365-2664.13535
EA DEC 2019
PG 13
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA KH7AU
UT WOS:000501888900001
OA Green Published, hybrid, Green Accepted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Yang, Q
   Zheng, JZ
   Zhu, HC
AF Yang, Qiang
   Zheng, Jiazhu
   Zhu, Hengchao
TI Influence of spatiotemporal change of temperature and rainfall on major
   grain yields in southern Jiangsu Province, China
SO GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION
LA English
DT Article
DE Spatial interpolation; Climate change; Trend analysis; Wavelet analysis;
   Abrupt analysis
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; IMPACTS; AGRICULTURE; VARIABILITY; GRASSLAND; MODEL
AB Spatiotemporal differences in temperature and rainfall play an important role in grain production and have wider implications for food security, an issue in China that has received worldwide attention. Jiangsu Province on China's east coast is a major contributor to grain production and therefore the region's climate has particular relevance to research on the nation's food security. This study explores the link between spatiotemporal climate patterns and grain production, which include rice output, summer grain output, and average grain output of those two seasons, using temperature and rainfall data from a study area in southern Jiangsu Province. Meteorological data covering about 40 years (1976-2013) were collected from 13 meteorological stations around the study region. Grain output was acquired from the same year's statistical report from the local government. Based on the thin plate spline method, meteorological data and grain output were interpolated to the same geographic grid. Several statistical methods-regression analysis, moving average, Mann-Kendall, moving t-test, and wavelet analysisdwere used to estimate the changing trends of metrological factors and grain output. The result showed that annual mean temperature, mean maximum temperature, and mean minimum temperature fluctuated and increased, and those changes were more abrupt in the late 1980s and early 1990s, with obvious periodic variation in three time scales: 25-32 years, 15-25 years, and 10-15 years. For abnormal annual rainfall, rainfall showed significant interannual difference in the region from 1976 to 2013. The results indicated that abrupt changes occurred from 1979 to 1980 and again from 2006 to 2007. Annual and seasonal rainfall also showed obvious periodic variation at the three time scales. The growth variation of average grain output increased with some fluctuation and was different in different periods. It gradually decreased from southeast to northwest, and had a very different spatial pattern. The annual mean temperature played an important role in agricultural production, but the annual rainfall had little effect on agriculture for annual and seasonal fluctuation from 1976 to 2013. Temperature indexes in spring, summer, and autumn had a significant effect on average rice output. For autumn grain output, temperature indexes also played an important role in summer and autumn. Moreover, correlation coefficients and p-values for temperature indexes and grain output were weak in summer, but also passed a significance test at the 95% confidence interval. The study helps understand the effect of climate change on grain production, and also provides a scientific foundation and theoretical support for formulating policy and measures on climatic adaptability for agricultural production in eastern China. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
C1 [Yang, Qiang; Zheng, Jiazhu; Zhu, Hengchao] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China.
C3 Nanjing Forestry University
RP Yang, Q (corresponding author), Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China.
EM qiangyang@njfu.edu.cn; 88530951@qq.com; zhuhengchao@njfu.edu.cn
RI yang, qiang/GYJ-0971-2022
FU State Key Laboratory of Geo-Information Engineering [SKLGIE2018-K-4-1]
FX This study was funded by State Key Laboratory of Geo-Information
   Engineering, NO. SKLGIE2018-K-4-1.
CR Adger W.N., 2010, PROG DEV STUD, V3, P179
   Alley RB, 2003, SCIENCE, V299, P2005, DOI 10.1126/science.1081056
   Alley Richard B, 2004, Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc, V115, P305
   [Anonymous], 1992, SCI ATMOS SIN
   Chavas DR, 2009, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V149, P1118, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.02.001
   Ding Y., 2006, Advances in Climate Change Research, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/0360-1285(76)90008-3
   Gao XJ, 2012, CHINESE SCI BULL, V57, P1188, DOI 10.1007/s11434-011-4935-8
   Godfray HCJ, 2010, SCIENCE, V327, P812, DOI 10.1126/science.1185383
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   HUTCHINSON MF, 1995, INT J GEOGR INF SYST, V9, P385, DOI 10.1080/02693799508902045
   Jiang W, 2017, ECOSYST SERV, V26, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.012
   Ju H, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V120, P313, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0803-7
   Lal R, 2004, SCIENCE, V304, P1623, DOI 10.1126/science.1097396
   Li Y, 2011, CLIM RES, V50, P83, DOI 10.3354/cr01038
   Liu XN, 2014, RANGELAND J, V36, P175, DOI 10.1071/RJ13103
   Liu XW, 2007, J CLEAN PROD, V15, P313, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.07.003
   Pacifici M, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P215, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2448
   [潘根兴 PAN Genxing], 2011, [农业环境科学学报, Journal of Agro-Environment Science], V30, P1698
   Piao SL, 2010, NATURE, V467, P43, DOI 10.1038/nature09364
   Polyakov IV, 2003, J CLIMATE, V16, P2067, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<2067:VATOAT>2.0.CO;2
   ROSENZWEIG C, 1994, NATURE, V367, P133, DOI 10.1038/367133a0
   Shen DJ, 2001, AMBIO, V30, P381, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2001)030[0381:CCIC]2.0.CO;2
   Smit B, 1996, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V6, P205, DOI 10.1016/0959-3780(96)00018-0
   Tait A, 2006, INT J CLIMATOL, V26, P2097, DOI 10.1002/joc.1350
   Tao F, 2003, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V95, P203, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00093-2
   Tao FL, 2008, CLIM RES, V38, P83, DOI 10.3354/cr00771
   Thomson AM, 2006, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V114, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.001
   Torrence C, 1998, B AM METEOROL SOC, V79, P61, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0061:APGTWA>2.0.CO;2
   Wang JX, 2009, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V40, P323, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00379.x
   Wang JB, 2011, INT J REMOTE SENS, V32, P6539, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2010.512933
   [王志刚 WANG ZhiGang], 2008, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V28, P720
   Xiong W, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V81, P205, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9123-5
   [阎洪 Yan Hong], 2004, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V24, P163
   [杨强 Yang Qiang], 2012, [干旱区地理, Arid Land Geography], V35, P695
   Yang Q, 2012, ARID LAND RES MANAG, V26, P328, DOI 10.1080/15324982.2012.709215
   Yao FM, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V80, P395, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9122-6
   Zhang BA, 2010, ECOL ECON, V69, P1389, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.009
   [赵志平 Zhao Zhiping], 2010, [自然资源学报, Journal of Natural Resources], V25, P2091
NR 38
TC 11
Z9 13
U1 1
U2 22
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2351-9894
J9 GLOB ECOL CONSERV
JI Glob. Ecol. Conserv.
PD MAR
PY 2020
VL 21
AR e00818
DI 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00818
PG 18
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA KR7RT
UT WOS:000517814100017
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Kangur, O
   Sopp, R
   Tullus, A
   Kupper, P
   Öunapuu-Pikas, E
   Tullus, H
   Lutter, R
AF Kangur, Ott
   Sopp, Reeno
   Tullus, Arvo
   Kupper, Priit
   Ounapuu-Pikas, Eele
   Tullus, Hardi
   Lutter, Reimo
TI Growth ranking of hybrid aspen genotypes and its linkage to leaf gas
   exchange
SO BMC PLANT BIOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Genotype ranking; Nitrogen; Populus; Water-use efficiency
ID TREMULOIDES MICHX. PLANTATIONS; SHORT-ROTATION FORESTRY; WATER-USE
   EFFICIENCY; PLANT-SOIL RELATIONS; BETULA-PENDULA ROTH; PHOTOSYNTHETIC
   CAPACITY; POPLAR; SOUTHERN; LAND; DISCRIMINATION
AB Background Afforestation of non-forestland is a new measure by the European Union to enhance climate mitigation and biodiversity. Hybrid aspen (Populus tremula L. x P. tremuloides Michx.) is among the suitable tree species for afforestation to produce woody biomass. However, the best performing genotypic material for intensive biomass production and its physiological adaptation capacity is still unclear. We compared 22 hybrid aspen genotypes growth and leaf physiological characteristics (stomatal conductance, net photosynthesis, intrinsic water-use efficiency) according to their geographical north- or southward transfer (European P. tremula parent from 51 degrees to 60 degrees N and North American P. tremuloides parent from 45 degrees to 54 degrees N) to hemiboreal Estonia (58 degrees N) in a completely randomized design progeny trial. We tested whether the growth ranking of genotypes of different geographical origin has changed from young (3-year-old) to mid-rotation age (13-year-old). The gas exchange parameters were measured in excised shoots in 2021 summer, which was characterised with warmer (+ 4 degrees C) and drier (17% precipitation from normal) June and July than the long-term average.Results We found that the northward transfer of hybrid aspen genotypes resulted in a significant gain in growth (two-fold greater diameter at breast height) in comparison with the southward transfer. The early selection of genotypes was generally in good accordance with the middle-aged genotype ranking, while some of the northward transferred genotypes showed improved growth at the middle-age period in comparison with their ranking during the early phase. The genotypes of southward transfer demonstrated higher stomatal conductance, which resulted in higher net photosynthesis, and lower intrinsic water-use efficiency (iWUE) compared with northward transfer genotypes. However, higher photosynthesis did not translate into higher growth rate. The higher physiological activity of southern transferred genotypes was likely related to a better water supply of smaller and consequently more shaded trees under drought. Leaf nitrogen concentration did not have any significant relation with tree growth.Conclusions We conclude that the final selection of hybrid aspen genotypes for commercial use should be done in 10-15 years after planting. Physiological traits acquired during periods of droughty conditions may not fully capture the growth potential. Nonetheless, we advocate for a broader integration of physiological measurements alongside traditional traits (such as height and diameter) in genotype field testing to facilitate the selection of climate-adapted planting material for resilient forests.
C1 [Kangur, Ott; Sopp, Reeno; Tullus, Arvo; Tullus, Hardi; Lutter, Reimo] Estonian Univ Life Sci, Inst Forestry & Engn, Chair Silviculture & Forest Ecol, Kreutzwaldi 5, EE-51006 Tartu, Estonia.
   [Tullus, Arvo; Kupper, Priit; Ounapuu-Pikas, Eele] Univ Tartu, Inst Ecol & Earth Sci, Dept Bot, Liivi 2, EE-50409 Tartu, Estonia.
C3 Estonian University of Life Sciences; University of Tartu; Tartu
   University Institute of Ecology & Earth Sciences
RP Lutter, R (corresponding author), Estonian Univ Life Sci, Inst Forestry & Engn, Chair Silviculture & Forest Ecol, Kreutzwaldi 5, EE-51006 Tartu, Estonia.
EM reimo.lutter@emu.ee
RI Tullus, Arvo/A-8680-2010; Õunapuu-Pikas, Eele/AAA-5389-2020; Lutter,
   Reimo/N-7788-2019; Tullus, Hardi/H-3777-2012
OI Ounapuu-Pikas, Eele/0000-0001-5697-9578
FU Estonian Research Council [PRG1007, PRG1434, PSG730]; AnaEE Estonia
   Project [2014-2020.4.01.20-0285]; European Regional Development Fund;
   Programme Mobilitas Pluss [MOBTP168]; European Commission's Horizon 2020
   programme [101000406]; European Commission's Horizon programme
   [101118127]
FX This work was supported by the Estonian Research Council grants PRG1007,
   PRG1434, and PSG730; AnaEE Estonia Project (2014-2020.4.01.20-0285);
   funded by the European Regional Development Fund and the programme
   Mobilitas Pluss (MOBTP168); by the European Commission's Horizon 2020
   programme under grant agreement no. 101000406 (project ONEforest) and
   European Commission's Horizon programme under grant agreement no.
   101118127 (project ECOLOOP).
CR Aletà N, 2009, ANN FOREST SCI, V66, DOI 10.1051/forest/2009021
   [Anonymous], 2023, Guidelines on Biodiversity-Friendly Afforestation, Reforestation and Tree Planting, DOI [10.2779/731, DOI 10.2779/731]
   Bloemen J, 2017, GCB BIOENERGY, V9, P370, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12345
   Booy G, 2000, PLANT BIOLOGY, V2, P379, DOI 10.1055/s-2000-5958
   Broeckx LS, 2014, TREE PHYSIOL, V34, P701, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpu057
   Cardoso AA, 2020, APPL SCI-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/app10186322
   Cernusak LA, 2013, NEW PHYTOL, V200, P950, DOI 10.1111/nph.12423
   EVANS JR, 1989, OECOLOGIA, V78, P9, DOI 10.1007/BF00377192
   Fahlvik N, 2021, J FORESTRY RES, V32, P181, DOI 10.1007/s11676-019-01067-9
   Fedorkov Aleksey, 2021, Folia Forestalia Polonica. Series A, Forestry, V63, P176, DOI 10.2478-ffp-2021-0018
   George JP, 2022, PLANT BIOLOGY, V24, P1108, DOI 10.1111/plb.13469
   de Andrés EG, 2018, J ECOL, V106, P59, DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12813
   Gornall JL, 2007, CAN J BOT, V85, P1202, DOI 10.1139/B07-079
   Grote R, 2016, TREES-STRUCT FUNCT, V30, P1467, DOI 10.1007/s00468-016-1446-x
   HOLBROOK NM, 1995, SCIENCE, V270, P1193, DOI 10.1126/science.270.5239.1193
   IUSS Working Group WRB, 2015, World Soil Resources Reports, V106, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0014479706394902
   Jaagus J, 2014, EST J EARTH SCI, V63, P166, DOI 10.3176/earth.2014.15
   Johansson T, 2013, J FORESTRY RES, V24, P237, DOI 10.1007/s11676-012-0305-x
   Johnsson H., 1953, Svenska Skogsvardsforeningens Tidskrift, V51, P73
   Jump AS, 2009, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V14, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.002
   Kaluthota S, 2015, TREE PHYSIOL, V35, P936, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpv069
   King JS, 2013, BIOSCIENCE, V63, P102, DOI 10.1525/bio.2013.63.2.6
   Kupper P, 2018, ECOHYDROLOGY, V11, DOI 10.1002/eco.1927
   Lambers H., 2008, Plant physiological ecology, P605, DOI [10.1007/978-0-387-78341-3, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-78341-3]
   Lee H., 2023, CLIMATE CHANGE 2023, DOI DOI 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
   Li YJ, 2017, TREE GENET GENOMES, V13, DOI 10.1007/s11295-017-1144-x
   Lohmus E., 1974, Metsanduslikud Uurimused, V11, P162
   Lüttschwager D, 2016, ACTA PHYSIOL PLANT, V38, DOI 10.1007/s11738-015-2057-7
   Lutter R, 2021, FORESTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/f12121810
   Lutter R, 2017, SCAND J FOREST RES, V32, P688, DOI 10.1080/02827581.2017.1278784
   Lutter R, 2016, NZ J FORESTRY SCI, V46, DOI 10.1186/s40490-016-0078-7
   Lutter R, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V378, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.07.021
   Lutter R, 2015, EUR J FOREST RES, V134, P653, DOI 10.1007/s10342-015-0879-x
   Maier CA, 2019, FORESTS, V10, DOI 10.3390/f10110993
   McAdam SAM, 2015, PLANT PHYSIOL, V167, P833, DOI 10.1104/pp.114.252940
   McKinney LV, 2014, PLANT PATHOL, V63, P485, DOI 10.1111/ppa.12196
   Pilipovic A, 2022, GCB BIOENERGY, V14, P287, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12887
   Pliura A, 2014, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V70, P513, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.09.011
   POORTER H, 1990, CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF VARIATION IN GROWTH RATE AND PRODUCTIVITY OF HIGHER PLANTS, P45
   Pretzsch H, 2022, EUR J FOREST RES, V141, P727, DOI 10.1007/s10342-022-01451-x
   Randlane T, 2017, CAN J FOREST RES, V47, P1202, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2017-0080
   Rasheed F, 2013, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V36, P87, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02556.x
   Rohula G, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P2169, DOI 10.1007/s10113-016-1024-1
   Rytter L, 2016, SILVA FENN, V50, DOI 10.14214/sf.1660
   Rytter L, 2014, SCAND J FOREST RES, V29, P747, DOI 10.1080/02827581.2014.968202
   Sellin A, 2008, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V134, P412, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01142.x
   Seneviratne SI, 2010, EARTH-SCI REV, V99, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.02.004
   Soolanayakanahally RY, 2009, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V32, P1821, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02042.x
   Sparks JP, 1999, TREE PHYSIOL, V19, P453
   Stener L. G., 2004, Forest Genetics, V11, P13
   Team RC, 2021, R LANGUAGE ENV STAT
   Tenkanen A, 2020, TREE PHYSIOL, V40, P198, DOI 10.1093/treephys/tpz124
   Tullus A, 2012, SCAND J FOREST RES, V27, P10, DOI 10.1080/02827581.2011.628949
   Tullus T, 2015, CAN J FOREST RES, V45, P1183, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0464
   Verlinden MS, 2015, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V38, P144, DOI 10.1111/pce.12383
   Vico G, 2021, BIOENERG RES, V14, P445, DOI 10.1007/s12155-021-10249-5
   Weih M, 2004, CAN J FOREST RES, V34, P1369, DOI 10.1139/X04-090
   Yu QB, 2003, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V173, P25, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00819-2
   Yu QB, 2001, SILVA FENN, V35, P137, DOI 10.14214/sf.591
NR 59
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 3
PU BMC
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND
SN 1471-2229
J9 BMC PLANT BIOL
JI BMC Plant Biol.
PD MAY 22
PY 2024
VL 24
IS 1
AR 435
DI 10.1186/s12870-024-05104-6
PG 13
WC Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences
GA RP6N3
UT WOS:001228905000002
PM 38773410
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Li, ZS
   Guo, XL
   Yang, Y
   Hong, Y
   Wang, ZJ
   You, LZ
AF Li, Zhansheng
   Guo, Xiaolin
   Yang, Yuan
   Hong, Yang
   Wang, Zhongjing
   You, Liangzhi
TI Heatwave Trends and the Population Exposure Over China in the 21st
   Century as Well as Under 1.5 °C and 2.0 °C Global Warmer Future
   Scenarios
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE heatwave; China; HWDI; NEX-GDDP; population exposure; 1; 5 degrees C and
   2; 0 degrees C warmer climate
ID EXTREME PRECIPITATION; TEMPERATURE EXTREMES; CLIMATE MODELS;
   UNITED-STATES; WAVES; PROJECTION; IMPACTS; EVENTS; INDEXES; SUMMER
AB Heatwaves exert negative socio-economic impacts and particularly have serious effects on public health. Based on the multi-model ensemble (MME) results of 10 downscaled high-resolution Fifth Phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) model output from NASA Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled Projections (NASA-GDDP), the intensity (largest lasting time), frequency and total duration of heatwaves over China as well as population exposure in the 21st century and at 1.5 degrees C and 2.0 degrees C above pre-industrial levels are investigated by using the three indices, the Heat Wave Duration Index (HWDI), annual total frequency of heatwaves (N_HW) and annual total days of heatwaves (T_HW) under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5. The MME results illustrate that heatwaves are projected to become more frequent (0.40/decade and 1.26/decade for N_HW), longer-lasting (3.78 days/decade and 14.59 days/decade for T_HW) as well as more extreme (1.07 days/decade and 2.90 days/decade for HWDI under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 respectively) over China. High latitude and high altitude regions, e.g., the Tibetan Plateau and northern China, are projected to experience a larger increase of intensity, frequency and the total time of heatwaves compared with southern China (except Central China). The total population affected by heatwaves is projected to increase significantly and will reach 1.18 billion in later part of the 21st century, and there will be more and more people expected to suffer long heatwave time (T_HW) in the 21st century. Compared with a 2.0 degrees C global warming climate, holding the global warming below 1.5 degrees C can avoid 26.9% and 29.1% of the increase of HWDI, 34.7% and 39.64% for N_TW and 35.3%-40.10% of T_HW under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 respectively. The half-degree less of warming will not only decrease the population exposure by 53-83 million but also avoid the threat caused by longer heatwave exposure under the two scenarios. Based on the comprehensive assessment of heatwave under the two RCP scenarios, this work would help to enhance the understanding of climate change and consequent risk in China and thus could provide useful information for making climate adaptation policies.
C1 [Li, Zhansheng; Guo, Xiaolin; Yang, Yuan; Hong, Yang; Wang, Zhongjing] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Hydraul Engn, State Key Lab Hydrosci & Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China.
   [Hong, Yang] Peking Univ, Inst Remote Sensing & GIS, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
   [You, Liangzhi] Int Food Policy Res Inst IFPR, EPTD, Washington, DC 20006 USA.
C3 Tsinghua University; Peking University; CGIAR; International Food Policy
   Research Institute (IFPRI)
RP Hong, Y; Wang, ZJ (corresponding author), Tsinghua Univ, Dept Hydraul Engn, State Key Lab Hydrosci & Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China.; Hong, Y (corresponding author), Peking Univ, Inst Remote Sensing & GIS, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
EM lizhsh1985@yahoo.com; guoxl15@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn;
   yangyuan15@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn; hongyang@tsinghua.edu.cn;
   zj.wang@tsinghua.edu.cn; L.YOU@CGIAR.ORG
RI Wang, Zhongjing/G-3315-2012; Li, Zhansheng/L-8017-2019; Hong,
   Yang/D-5132-2009
OI Hong, Yang/0000-0001-8720-242X
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [71461010701, 41701385]
FX This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China, grant number. 71461010701 and 41701385.
CR Ali J, 2018, EARTH SYST ENVIRON, V2, P437, DOI 10.1007/s41748-018-0064-8
   Bao Y, 2017, J METEOROL RES-PRC, V31, P236, DOI 10.1007/s13351-017-6106-6
   Huo-Po C, 2017, ATMOS OCEAN SCI LETT, V10, P403, DOI 10.1080/16742834.2017.1367625
   [陈晓晨 Chen Xiaochen], 2015, [大气科学, Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences], V39, P1123
   Chevuturi A, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P339, DOI 10.1002/2017EF000734
   Coumou D, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P491, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1452
   Ding T, 2015, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V122, P651, DOI 10.1007/s00704-014-1322-9
   Ding T, 2011, ADV ATMOS SCI, V28, P322, DOI 10.1007/s00376-010-9236-7
   Dong SY, 2015, ADV ATMOS SCI, V32, P1077, DOI 10.1007/s00376-015-4152-5
   Dong TY, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2018.01.003
   Dosio A, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aab827
   Douglas EM, 2000, J HYDROL, V240, P90, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00336-X
   Fang JY, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P4015, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1700304115
   Gocic M, 2013, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V100, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.10.014
   Gosling SN, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V141, P577, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1773-3
   Guo XJ, 2017, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V128, P507, DOI 10.1007/s00704-015-1718-1
   Hu WW, 2019, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/atmos10010001
   Huang JL, 2018, CLIM DYNAM, V50, P507, DOI 10.1007/s00382-017-3623-z
   Hulme M, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P222, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2939
   Im ES, 2017, SCI ADV, V3, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1603322
   IPCC, 2018, GLOB WARM 1 5C SUMM
   Jiang DB, 2016, INT J CLIMATOL, V36, P1114, DOI 10.1002/joc.4406
   [蒋帅 Jiang Shuai], 2017, [气候变化研究进展, Progressus Inquisitiones de Mutatione Climatis], V13, P11
   Jiang ZH, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V110, P385, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0090-0
   Karmalkar AV, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0168697
   Kunkel KE, 1999, J CLIMATE, V12, P2515, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<2515:LTTIEP>2.0.CO;2
   Leng GY, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V644, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.344
   Li DH, 2018, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V45, P1541, DOI 10.1002/2017GL076753
   Li JF, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V118, P11017, DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50851
   Li W, 2018, SCI BULL, V63, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2017.12.021
   Mann HB, 1945, ECONOMETRICA, V13, P245, DOI 10.2307/1907187
   Meehl GA, 2004, SCIENCE, V305, P994, DOI 10.1126/science.1098704
   Mitchell D, 2017, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V10, P571, DOI 10.5194/gmd-10-571-2017
   Nikulin G, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aab1b1
   Perkins-Kirkpatrick SE, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-12520-2
   Piao SL, 2010, NATURE, V467, P43, DOI 10.1038/nature09364
   Radinovic D, 2012, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V107, P505, DOI 10.1007/s00704-011-0495-8
   Ruane AC, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V259, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.05.013
   Schleussner CF, 2016, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V7, P327, DOI 10.5194/esd-7-327-2016
   SEN PK, 1968, J AM STAT ASSOC, V63, P1379
   Sillmann J, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V118, P2473, DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50188
   Suhaila J, 2018, METEOROL ATMOS PHYS, V130, P565, DOI 10.1007/s00703-017-0537-6
   SUI Y, 2018, INT J CLIMATOL S1, V38, pE678, DOI DOI 10.1002/JOC.5399
   Sun Y, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P1082, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2410
   Tabari H, 2011, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V151, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.09.009
   Thanigachalam A., 2017, P AGU FALL M NEW ORL
   Wang HJ, 2012, METEOROL Z, V21, P279, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2012/0330
   Wang PY, 2019, CLIM DYNAM, V53, P957, DOI 10.1007/s00382-019-04621-7
   Wang PY, 2019, CLIM DYNAM, V52, P799, DOI 10.1007/s00382-018-4167-6
   Wu CH, 2015, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V19, P1385, DOI 10.5194/hess-19-1385-2015
   Wu J, 2015, CHINESE J GEOPHYS-CH, V58, P3048, DOI 10.6038/cjg20150903
   Xu CH, 2012, ATMOS OCEAN SCI LETT, V5, P527, DOI 10.1080/16742834.2012.11447042
   Xu Y, 2012, ATMOS OCEAN SCI LETT, V5, P489, DOI 10.1080/16742834.2012.11447041
   Yang HL, 2010, CLIM RES, V42, P79, DOI 10.3354/cr00860
   Yao Y, 2012, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V3, P179, DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1248.2012.00179
   Ye DX, 2014, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V5, P66, DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1248.2014.066
   You QL, 2017, CLIM DYNAM, V48, P3975, DOI 10.1007/s00382-016-3315-0
   You QL, 2016, INT J CLIMATOL, V36, P2660, DOI 10.1002/joc.4520
   Zhai PM, 2003, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V30, DOI 10.1029/2003GL018004
   Zhan MJ, 2018, J METEOROL RES-PRC, V32, P99, DOI 10.1007/s13351-018-7016-y
   Zhou BT, 2014, J CLIMATE, V27, P6591, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00761.1
   Zhou M. Z., 2018, ADV CLIMATE CHANGE R, V14, P221, DOI DOI 10.12006/J.ISSN.1673-1719.2017.230
   Zhou TJ, 2014, B AM METEOROL SOC, V95, pS54
NR 63
TC 29
Z9 31
U1 6
U2 67
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JUN 2
PY 2019
VL 11
IS 12
AR 3318
DI 10.3390/su11123318
PG 21
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA IG4DG
UT WOS:000473753700088
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Peng, B
   Guan, KY
   Chen, M
   Lawrence, DM
   Pokhrel, Y
   Suyker, A
   Arkebauer, T
   Lu, YQ
AF Peng, Bin
   Guan, Kaiyu
   Chen, Min
   Lawrence, David M.
   Pokhrel, Yadu
   Suyker, Andrew
   Arkebauer, Timothy
   Lu, Yaqiong
TI Improving maize growth processes in the community land model:
   Implementation and evaluation
SO AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Maize; Community land model; APSIM; Phenology; Carbon allocation; Yield;
   Stress
ID GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTION; CROPPING SYSTEMS; HEAT-STRESS; ECOSYSTEM
   RESPIRATION; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; SIMULATION-MODEL; IRRIGATED MAIZE;
   HYBRID-MAIZE; JULES-CROP; CARBON
AB Earth system models (ESMs) are essential tools to study the impacts of historical and future climate on regional and global food production, as well as to assess the effectiveness of possible adaptations and their potential feedback to climate. Several current ESMs have the capabilities to simulate crop growth. However, some critical crop growth processes (e.g. flowering and other reproductive processes) and their responses to environmental extremes (e.g. heat stress) are not yet represented in most of these models. In this paper, an improved maize growth model was implemented in the Community Land Model version 4.5 (CLM4.5) by modifying the maize planting scheme, incorporating the phenology scheme adopted from the APSIM model (Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator), adding a new carbon allocation scheme into CLM4.5, and improving the estimation of canopy structure parameters including leaf area index (LAI) and canopy height. Unique features of the new model (CLM-APSIM) include more detailed phenology stages, an explicit implementation of the impacts of various abiotic environmental stresses (including nitrogen, water, temperature and heat stresses) on maize phenology and carbon allocation, as well as an explicit simulation of grain number. Evaluation of results at 7 AmeriFlux sites located in the US Corn Belt show that the CLM-APSIM model performs better than the original CLM4.5 in simulating phenology (LAI and canopy height), surface fluxes including gross primary production (GPP), net ecosystem exchange (NEE), latent heat (LH), and sensible heat (SH), and especially in simulating the biomass partition and maize yield. The CLM-APSIM model corrects a serious deficiency in CLM4.5-related to CLM4.5's underestimation of aboveground biomass (i.e. overestimation of belowground biomass) and overestimation of Harvest Index, which lead to a reasonable yield estimation with wrong mechanisms. Moreover, 13 year simulation results from 2001 to 2013 at the three Mead sites (US-Nel, Ne2 and Ne3) show that the CLM-APSIM model can more accurately reproduce maize yield responses to growing season climate (temperature and precipitation) than the original CLM4.5 when benchmarked with the site-based observations and USDA county level survey statistics. The CLM-APSIM model is thus more suitable than its predecessor models in terms of simulating abiotic environmental stresses on maize yield. This new model provides an improved tool to attribute maize yield change to various processes under historical and future climate, as well as to assess and design effective climate adaptation strategies for sustainable agricultural production.
C1 [Peng, Bin; Guan, Kaiyu] Univ Illinois, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.
   [Peng, Bin; Guan, Kaiyu] Univ Illinois, Natl Ctr Supercomp Applicat, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.
   [Chen, Min] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Joint Global Change Res Inst, College Pk, MD USA.
   [Lawrence, David M.; Lu, Yaqiong] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA.
   [Pokhrel, Yadu] Michigan State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
   [Suyker, Andrew] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Sch Nat Resources, Lincoln, NE USA.
   [Arkebauer, Timothy] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Dept Agron & Hort, Lincoln, NE USA.
C3 University of Illinois System; University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign;
   University of Illinois System; University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign;
   United States Department of Energy (DOE); Pacific Northwest National
   Laboratory; National Center Atmospheric Research (NCAR) - USA; Michigan
   State University; University of Nebraska System; University of Nebraska
   Lincoln; University of Nebraska System; University of Nebraska Lincoln
RP Peng, B; Guan, KY (corresponding author), Univ Illinois, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.; Peng, B; Guan, KY (corresponding author), Univ Illinois, Natl Ctr Supercomp Applicat, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.
EM binpeng@illinois.edu; kaiyug@illinois.edu
RI Lawrence, David/C-4026-2011; Suyker, Andy/ABC-8910-2021; Lu,
   Yaqiong/K-6930-2014; Guan, Kaiyu/N-5772-2015; Chen, Min/HCI-4409-2022;
   Pokhrel, Yadu/J-6440-2013; Peng, Bin/M-2584-2017
OI Pokhrel, Yadu/0000-0002-1367-216X; Chen, Min/0000-0001-6311-7124; Peng,
   Bin/0000-0002-7284-3010
FU NASA New Investigator Award [NNX16AI56G]; USDA National Institute of
   Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Foundational Program [2017-67013-26253];
   Blue Waters Professorship (National Center for Supercomputing
   Applications of University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign); USDA NIFA
   award [2015-67003-23489]; National Science Foundation [OCI-0725070,
   ACI-1238993]; state of Illinois; U.S. Department of Energy's Office of
   Science; NASA [903006, NNX16AI56G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER;
   NIFA [914657, 2017-67013-26253] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
FX BP and KG acknowledge the supports from the NASA New Investigator Award
   (NNX16AI56G), USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA)
   Foundational Program award (2017-67013-26253), and Blue Waters
   Professorship (National Center for Supercomputing Applications of
   University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign) awarded to KG. DML
   acknowledges support from a USDA NIFA award 2015-67003-23489. This
   research is part of the Blue Waters sustained-petascale computing
   project, which is supported by the National Science Foundation (awards
   OCI-0725070 and ACI-1238993) and the state of Illinois. Blue Waters is a
   joint effort of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and its
   National Center for Supercomputing Applications. We acknowledge the
   following AmeriFlux sites for their data records: US-Nel, US-Nel,
   US-Ne3, US-Bol, US-IB1, US-Br1, and US-Ro1. In addition, funding for
   AmeriFlux data resources and core site data was provided by the U.S.
   Department of Energy's Office of Science.
CR Allison VJ, 2005, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V69, P1412, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2004.0252
   Amos B, 2006, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V70, P1489, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2005.0216
   ANDERSON EL, 1988, PLANT SOIL, V108, P245, DOI 10.1007/BF02375655
   Andrade FH, 1999, CROP SCI, V39, P453, DOI 10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X0039000200026x
   Andrade FH, 2002, CROP SCI, V42, P1173, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2002.1173
   [Anonymous], 1986, 48 IOW STAT U SCI TE
   [Anonymous], 1987, PROGR PHOTOSYNTHESIS, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-0519-6_48
   [Anonymous], 2015, FIELD CROPS RES
   [Anonymous], 2015, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, DOI DOI 10.5194/gmd-8-261-2015
   Archontoulis SV, 2014, AGRON J, V106, P1025, DOI 10.2134/agronj2013.0421
   Badger AM, 2015, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V19, P4547, DOI 10.5194/hess-19-4547-2015
   Baker JM, 2005, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V128, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.005
   Ball J.T., 1988, ANAL STOMATAL CONDUC
   Bernacchi CJ, 2005, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V11, P1867, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.01050.x
   Bilionis I, 2015, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V8, P1071, DOI 10.5194/gmd-8-1071-2015
   Bonan GB, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V117, DOI 10.1029/2011JG001913
   Bonan GB, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V116, DOI 10.1029/2010JG001593
   Bonhomme R, 2000, EUR J AGRON, V13, P1, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00058-7
   Brown HE, 2014, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V62, P385, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.005
   CARBERRY PS, 1989, FIELD CROP RES, V20, P297, DOI 10.1016/0378-4290(89)90072-5
   Chauhan YS, 2013, FIELD CROP RES, V144, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.01.018
   Chen M, 2015, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V120, P310, DOI 10.1002/2014JG002780
   COLLATZ GJ, 1992, AUST J PLANT PHYSIOL, V19, P519, DOI 10.1071/PP9920519
   COLLATZ GJ, 1991, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V54, P107, DOI 10.1016/0168-1923(91)90002-8
   Daly C, 2008, INT J CLIMATOL, V28, P2031, DOI 10.1002/joc.1688
   DANALATOS NG, 1994, AGRONOMIE, V14, P433, DOI 10.1051/agro:19940702
   de Vries F.W.T. Penning., 1989, Simulation of ecophysiological processes of growth in several annual crops
   Deryng D, 2011, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY, V25, DOI 10.1029/2009GB003765
   Deryng D, 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034011
   Dobor L, 2016, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V223, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.03.023
   Drewniak B, 2013, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V6, P495, DOI 10.5194/gmd-6-495-2013
   Drewniak BA, 2015, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V12, P2119, DOI 10.5194/bg-12-2119-2015
   Elliott J, 2014, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V62, P509, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.04.008
   FARQUHAR GD, 1980, PLANTA, V149, P78, DOI 10.1007/BF00386231
   Gao F, 2017, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V188, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2016.11.004
   Gaydon DS, 2017, FIELD CROP RES, V204, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.015
   Griffis TJ, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V113, DOI 10.1029/2007JD009297
   Guan K, 2017, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V232, P291, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.07.021
   Guan KY, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P716, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13136
   Guan KY, 2015, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V42, P8001, DOI 10.1002/2015GL063877
   Hammer GL, 2010, J EXP BOT, V61, P2185, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erq095
   Hammer GL, 2009, CROP SCI, V49, P299, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2008.03.0152
   Hébert Y, 2001, CROP SCI, V41, P363, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2001.412363x
   Hernandez-Ramirez G, 2011, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V151, P1831, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.07.017
   Holzworth DP, 2014, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V62, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.07.009
   Hurrell JW, 2013, B AM METEOROL SOC, V94, P1339, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00121.1
   Jin Z., 2017, GEOMECH GEOPHYS GEPE, P1
   Jin Z., 2016, PRECIS AGRIC, P1
   Jin ZN, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P3112, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13376
   Jones J.W., 1986, CERES-Maize: A simulation model of maize growth and development
   Jones JW, 2003, EUR J AGRON, V18, P235, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00107-7
   KEATING BA, 1992, FIELD CROP RES, V29, P163, DOI 10.1016/0378-4290(92)90085-N
   Keating BA, 2003, EUR J AGRON, V18, P267, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00108-9
   Kucharik CJ, 2003, EARTH INTERACT, V7
   Kumudini S, 2014, AGRON J, V106, P2087, DOI 10.2134/agronj14.0200
   Law B. E., 2008, 55 FAO GLOB TERR OBS
   Lawrence DM, 2011, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V3, DOI 10.1029/2011MS000045
   Levis S, 2014, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V7, P613, DOI 10.5194/gmd-7-613-2014
   Levis S, 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/061002
   Levis S, 2012, J CLIMATE, V25, P4839, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00446.1
   Levitsky S, 2016, CHALLENGES OF PARTY-BUILDING IN LATIN AMERICA, P1
   Liu X, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V121, P13953, DOI 10.1002/2016JD025597
   Lobell DB, 2014, SCIENCE, V344, P516, DOI 10.1126/science.1251423
   Lobell DB, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P497, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1832, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1832]
   Lokupitiya E, 2016, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V129, P53, DOI 10.1007/s10533-016-0219-3
   McCown RL, 1996, AGR SYST, V50, P255, DOI 10.1016/0308-521X(94)00055-V
   Meyers TP, 2004, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V125, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.03.001
   Oleson K., 2013, TECHNICAL DESCRIPTIO, DOI [DOI 10.5065/D6RR1W7M, 10.5065/D6RR1W7M]
   Ort DR, 2014, SCIENCE, V344, P483, DOI 10.1126/science.1253884
   Osborne T, 2015, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V8, P1139, DOI 10.5194/gmd-8-1139-2015
   Ozdogan M, 2010, J HYDROMETEOROL, V11, P171, DOI 10.1175/2009JHM1116.1
   Peng B., 2016, AGU FALL M
   Post H, 2017, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V122, P661, DOI 10.1002/2015JG003297
   Edreira JIR, 2011, FIELD CROP RES, V123, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.04.015
   Edreira JIR, 2014, FIELD CROP RES, V166, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.018
   Rezaei EE, 2015, EUR J AGRON, V64, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2014.10.003
   Rosenzweig C, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3268, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1222463110
   Sacks WJ, 2010, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V19, P607, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00551.x
   Schauberger B, 2017, NAT COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1038/ncomms13931
   Schlenker W, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P15594, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0906865106
   Shi MJ, 2013, ECOL MODEL, V263, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.04.008
   Song Y, 2013, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V10, P8039, DOI 10.5194/bg-10-8039-2013
   Song YH, 2010, PLANT PROD SCI, V13, P199, DOI 10.1626/pps.13.199
   Stefan S., 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9
   Stöckle CO, 2003, EUR J AGRON, V18, P289, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00109-0
   Stöckle CO, 2014, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V62, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.006
   Sultan B, 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/104006
   Sus O, 2013, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V10, P2451, DOI 10.5194/bg-10-2451-2013
   Suyker AE, 2005, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V131, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.05.007
   Suyker AE, 2012, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V165, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.05.021
   Thornton PE, 2005, ECOL MODEL, V189, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.04.008
   Urban D., ESTIMATING IN PRESS
   Verma SB, 2005, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V131, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.05.003
   Viña A, 2004, AGRON J, V96, P1139, DOI 10.2134/agronj2004.1139
   Vuichard N, 2015, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V7, P157, DOI 10.5194/essd-7-157-2015
   WILLIAMS JR, 1989, T ASAE, V32, P497
   Williams K, 2017, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V10, P1291, DOI 10.5194/gmd-10-1291-2017
   Wilson DR, 1995, FIELD CROP RES, V43, P1, DOI 10.1016/0378-4290(95)00037-Q
   Yang HS, 2017, FIELD CROP RES, V204, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.01.019
   Yang HS, 2004, FIELD CROP RES, V87, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2003.10.003
   Zhang YG, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P3727, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12664
NR 101
TC 76
Z9 83
U1 7
U2 113
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
PI AMSTERDAM
PA PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0168-1923
EI 1873-2240
J9 AGR FOREST METEOROL
JI Agric. For. Meteorol.
PD MAR 15
PY 2018
VL 250
BP 64
EP 89
DI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.11.012
PG 26
WC Agronomy; Forestry; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Forestry; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA FZ1LP
UT WOS:000427338400006
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Zhu, ZH
   Zhang, TT
   Benmarhnia, T
   Chen, X
   Wang, HL
   Wulayin, M
   Knibbs, L
   Yang, S
   Xu, LL
   Huang, CR
   Wang, Q
AF Zhu, Zhenghong
   Zhang, Tuantuan
   Benmarhnia, Tarik
   Chen, Xin
   Wang, Huailin
   Wulayin, Maimaitiminjiang
   Knibbs, Luke
   Yang, Song
   Xu, Lianlian
   Huang, Cunrui
   Wang, Qiong
TI Estimating the burden of temperature-related low birthweight
   attributable to anthropogenic climate change in low-income and
   middle-income countries: a retrospective, multicentre, epidemiological
   study
SO LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH
LA English
DT Article
ID EXPOSURE
AB Background Pregnant individuals are particularly susceptible to non-optimal temperatures due to their physiological status. Moreover, pregnancy is a crucial period for programming fetal health. Quantifying the impact of non-optimal temperature exposure and the contribution of anthropogenic climate change is crucial for mitigating and adapting to climate-related health risks. However, this has not been thoroughly studied in pregnant individuals in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).<br /> Methods Using data from 511 449 births across 31 LMICs from 1990 to 2018, we linked climate simulations (with and without anthropogenic forcing) to spatiotemporally resolved temperature data and birthweight records. We assessed the association between heat and cold exposure (ie, >90th and <10th percentile of temperature by region) during pregnancy and birthweight across different regions. We then used temperature simulations from both historically forced and natural-only forced climate models to estimate changes in exposure due to anthropogenic climate change and to quantify the burden of temperature-related low birthweight (ie, a birthweight <2500 g) attributable to anthropogenic climate change.<br /> Findings Heat exposure during pregnancy, compared with the optimal temperature range, was associated with an increased risk of low birthweight in several regions: southern Asia (odds ratio 1<middle dot>41, 95% CI 1<middle dot>34-1<middle dot>48), western Africa (1<middle dot>12, 1<middle dot>02-1<middle dot>24), and eastern Africa (1<middle dot>40, 1<middle dot>27-1<middle dot>55). Cold exposure increased the risk of low birthweight in central Africa (1<middle dot>31, 1<middle dot>10-1<middle dot>56), southern Africa (1<middle dot>18, 1<middle dot>02-1<middle dot>36), and eastern Africa (1<middle dot>14, 1<middle dot>02-1<middle dot>26). Anthropogenic climate change contributed to approximately 59<middle dot>2% (95% CI 16<middle dot>6-94<middle dot>3), 89<middle dot>0% (51<middle dot>0-100<middle dot>0), and 77<middle dot>3% (27<middle dot>0-100<middle dot>0) of heat-related low birthweight cases in southern Asia, western Africa, and eastern Africa, respectively. Conversely, in regions where cold exposure was predominant, anthropogenic climate change reduced the burden of low birthweight. Interpretation Our study provides quantitative estimates of the contribution of anthropogenic climate change to the low birthweight burden in LMICs. These findings can inform strategies for climate mitigation and adaptation in LMICs and help reduce global health inequalities.
C1 [Zhu, Zhenghong; Chen, Xin; Wang, Huailin; Wulayin, Maimaitiminjiang; Wang, Qiong] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Guangzhou 510080, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Tuantuan; Yang, Song; Xu, Lianlian] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Atmospher Sci, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Tuantuan; Yang, Song; Xu, Lianlian] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab, Zhuhai, Peoples R China.
   [Benmarhnia, Tarik] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, San Diego, CA USA.
   [Knibbs, Luke] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
   [Knibbs, Luke] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Publ Hlth Unit, Publ Hlth Res Analyt & Methods Evidence, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
   [Huang, Cunrui] Tsinghua Univ, Wanke Sch Publ Hlth, Beijing, Peoples R China.
RP Wang, Q (corresponding author), Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Guangzhou 510080, Peoples R China.
EM wangqiong@mail.sysu.edu.cn
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China
FX Funding National Natural Science Foundation of China.
CR Althor G, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep20281
   [Anonymous], 2024, World Population Prospects-Population Division
   Basagaña X, 2021, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V129, DOI 10.1289/EHP8117
   Bell ML, 2024, NEW ENGL J MED, V390, P1793, DOI 10.1056/NEJMra2210769
   Browne VA, 2015, PHILOS T R SOC B, V370, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2014.0068
   Burgert ClaraR., 2013, Incorporating Geographic Information into Demographic and Health Surveys: A Field Guide to Gps Data Collection
   Chersich MF, 2020, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V371, DOI 10.1136/bmj.m3811
   Dadvand P, 2011, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V119, P1449, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1003241
   Dennery PA, 2010, FREE RADICAL BIO MED, V49, P1147, DOI 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.07.011
   Gillett NP, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P3685, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-3685-2016
   Grace K, 2021, DEMOGRAPHY, V58, P499, DOI 10.1215/00703370-8977484
   Grace K, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V35, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.010
   Harris I, 2020, SCI DATA, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3
   Hersbach H, 2020, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V146, P1999, DOI 10.1002/qj.3803
   ICF International, 2012, Demographic and health survey sampling and household listing manual
   Jakpor O, 2020, ENVIRON INT, V142, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105847
   Kloog I, 2018, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12940-018-0420-z
   Localio AR, 2017, ANN INTERN MED, V167, P285, DOI 10.7326/M17-1485
   MacVicar S, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0179010
   Masson-Delmotte V, 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE 2021, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009157896
   Okwaraji YB, 2024, LANCET, V403, P1071, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01198-4
   Rashid H, 2017, TROP MED HEALTH, V45, DOI 10.1186/s41182-016-0041-6
   Rodríguez-Rodríguez P, 2018, FRONT PHYSIOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00602
   Samuels L, 2022, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V66, P1505, DOI 10.1007/s00484-022-02301-6
   Sbiroli E, 2022, J CLIM CHANGE HEALTH, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.joclim.2022.100169
   Seltenrich N, 2015, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V123, DOI 10.1289/ehp.123-A275
   Sun SZ, 2019, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V127, DOI 10.1289/EHP4648
   UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2012, Decision 3/CP.18. Approaches to address loss and damage associated with climate change impacts in developing countries that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change to enhance adaptive capacity
   Vicedo-Cabrera AM, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, P492, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-01058-x
   Vicedo-Cabrera AM, 2023, ENVIRON RES LETT, V18, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ace0d0
   WHO, 2023, UNICEF-WHO low birthweight estimates: levels and trends 2000-2020
   Wulayin M, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V901, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165912
   Xue T, 2023, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V7, pE736, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00165-1
   Xue T, 2021, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V5, pE15, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30268-0
   Yitshak-Sade M, 2021, ENVIRON INT, V155, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106588
   Zhang YL, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-35008-8
   Zhu Q, 2024, EBioMedicine., V103, P103
NR 37
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
EI 2542-5196
J9 LANCET PLANET HEALTH
JI Lancet Planet. Health
PD DEC
PY 2024
VL 8
IS 12
BP e997
EP e1009
PG 13
WC Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational
   Health
GA Q7I1A
UT WOS:001386358200001
PM 39674206
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Damtie, BB
   Mengistu, DA
   Waktola, DK
   Meshesha, DT
AF Damtie, Bekele Bedada
   Mengistu, Daniel Ayalew
   Waktola, Daniel Kassahun
   Meshesha, Derege Tsegaye
TI Impacts of Soil and Water Conservation Practice on Soil Moisture in
   Debre Mewi and Sholit Watersheds, Abbay Basin, Ethiopia
SO AGRICULTURE-BASEL
LA English
DT Article
DE remote sensing; SWC; Sentinel-1A; soil moisture; water cloud model; LAI;
   upper Abbay basin; Ethiopia
ID LEAF-AREA INDEX; NORTHERN ETHIOPIA; SEDIMENT YIELD; DRY SPELL; LAND-USE;
   EROSION; RUNOFF; RAINFALL; CLIMATE; DEGRADATION
AB Soil and water conservation (SWC) practices have been widely implemented to reduce surface runoff in the Debre Mewi watershed. However, studies on the issue have disproportionately focused on the lost or preserved soils, expressed in tons per hectare, while the impacts on the lost or preserved moisture were inadequately addressed. This study aimed to investigate the impacts of soil and water conservation practice on soil moisture in the Debre Mewi and Sholit watersheds, Abbay basin, Ethiopia. We compared soil moisture between the treated (Debre Mewi) and the untreated (Sholit) watersheds with SWCs, based on Sentinel-1A data and the field-measured soil moisture, Leaf Area Index (LAI), and water cloud model (WCM). Field-measurement was based on satellite-synchronized 63 soil moisture samples, systematically collected from the two treatment slope positions, two treatment positions, and two depths. We employed ANOVA to compare samples and discern patterns along space and time. The result indicated that the LAI, a predictor of crop yield, was higher in the SWC treated watershed, demonstrating the potential of conserving moisture for boosting crop production. In addition, the results reveal that the higher soil moisture was recorded on the grasslands of the treated watershed at a depth of 15-30 cm, while the lowest was from croplands and eucalyptus trees at 0-15 cm depth. A higher correlation was observed between the measured and estimated soil moisture across three stages of crop development. The soil moisture estimation using WCM from the Sentinel-1 satellite data gives promising results with good correlation (R-2 = 0.69, 0.43 and 0.75, RMSE = 0.16, 2.24 and 0.02, and in Sholit (0.7539, 0.933, and 0.3673 and the RMSEs are 0.17%, 0.02%, and 1.02%) for different dates: August, September, and November 2020, respectively. We conclude that in the face of climate change-induced rainfall variability in tropical countries, predicted to elongate the dry spell during the cropping season, the accurate measurement of soil moistures with the mix of satellite and in-situ data could support rain-fed agriculture planning and assist in fine-tuning the climate adaptation measures at the local and regional scales.
C1 [Damtie, Bekele Bedada; Mengistu, Daniel Ayalew] Bahir Dar Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, Bahir Dar 079, Ethiopia.
   [Damtie, Bekele Bedada] Bahir Dar Univ, Inst Land Adm, Bahir Dar 079, Ethiopia.
   [Damtie, Bekele Bedada; Mengistu, Daniel Ayalew; Meshesha, Derege Tsegaye] Bahir Dar Univ, Geospatial Data & Technol Ctr, Bahir Dar 079, Ethiopia.
   [Waktola, Daniel Kassahun] Austin Community Coll, Dept GIS, Austin, TX 78752 USA.
   [Meshesha, Derege Tsegaye] Bahir Dar Univ, Coll Agr & Environm Sci, Bahir Dar 1289, Ethiopia.
C3 Bahir Dar University; Bahir Dar University; Bahir Dar University; Bahir
   Dar University
RP Damtie, BB (corresponding author), Bahir Dar Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, Bahir Dar 079, Ethiopia.; Damtie, BB (corresponding author), Bahir Dar Univ, Inst Land Adm, Bahir Dar 079, Ethiopia.; Damtie, BB (corresponding author), Bahir Dar Univ, Geospatial Data & Technol Ctr, Bahir Dar 079, Ethiopia.
EM bekelebedada031@gmail.com; daniel.kassahun@gmail.com;
   dan952003@gmail.com; derege2014@gmail.com
OI Bedada, Bekele/0000-0003-3673-8560
FU Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Ethiopia (MoSHE)
FX This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education
   of Ethiopia (MoSHE). The authors would like to thank the NASA Land
   Processes Distributed Active Archive Center (LP DAAC) and US Geological
   Survey (USGS) for sharing Landsat data. We also thanks the Copernicus
   Open Access Hub, provides complete, free and open access to Sentinel-1
   products, and allow to download Sentinel application platform (SNAP)
   freely. This research received no external funding.
CR Adimassu Z., 2018, HIGHLIGHTS SOIL WATE
   Alemayhu A., 2020, International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology, V10, P7, DOI 10.3329/ijarit.v10i2.51570
   Alexakis DD, 2017, SENSORS-BASEL, V17, DOI 10.3390/s17061455
   Alqurashi A.F., 2013, ADV REMOTE SENSING, V2, P193, DOI DOI 10.4236/ARS.2013.22022
   Alshari E A., 2021, Global Transitions Proceedings, V2, P8, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.GLTP.2021.01.002
   [Anonymous], 2019, Summary for Policy Makers; Global Warming of 1.5 Degrees Celsius, P1
   Araya T, 2011, SOIL USE MANAGE, V27, P404, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00347.x
   Ayehu G, 2020, SENSORS-BASEL, V20, DOI 10.3390/s20113282
   Baghdadi N, 2006, INT J REMOTE SENS, V27, P3831, DOI 10.1080/01431160600658123
   Baghdadi N, 2017, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/rs9090969
   Bekele A., 2001, Food security through sustainable land use: Population, environment, and rural development issues for sustainable livelihoods in Ethiopia, P165
   Bekele M., 2001, Country report
   Belayneh M, 2019, ECOL PROCESS, V8, DOI 10.1186/s13717-019-0188-2
   Bishaw B, 2001, NE AFRICAN STUDIES, V8, P7
   Bojo J.P., 1995, LAND DEGRADATION REH, V1, P1
   Borowik A, 2016, PLANT SOIL ENVIRON, V62, P250, DOI 10.17221/158/2016-PSE
   Bousbih S, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10121953
   Bousbih S, 2017, SENSORS-BASEL, V17, DOI 10.3390/s17112617
   Brocca L, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9020140
   Constable M., 1985, 24 MIN AGR ADD
   Dagnachew M, 2020, APPL ENVIRON SOIL SC, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/1868792
   Dagnew DC, 2015, J HYDROL HYDROMECH, V63, P210, DOI 10.1515/johh-2015-0021
   das Neves HH, 2017, SCI AGR, V74, P383, DOI [10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0213, 10.1590/1678-992X-2016-0213]
   Erkossa T, 2018, INT SOIL WATER CONSE, V6, P305, DOI 10.1016/j.iswcr.2018.06.001
   FAO, 1986, ETH HIGHL RECL STUD, P37
   Fiedler A, 2017, SUPPORTING INCLUSIVE
   Gadana DB, 2020, ADV AGR, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/8866230
   Garrison JL, 2017, 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTROMAGNETICS IN ADVANCED APPLICATIONS (ICEAA), P1604, DOI 10.1109/ICEAA.2017.8065595
   Graham AJ, 2003, PROG PHYS GEOG, V27, P217, DOI 10.1191/0309133303pp378ra
   GSP, 2017, GLOB SOIL PARTN END
   Gulev S. K., 2021, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781009157896.004, 10.1017/9781009157896, 10.1017/9781009157896.004]
   Gwak Y, 2017, HYDROL PROCESS, V31, P431, DOI 10.1002/hyp.11039
   Haregeweyn N, 2006, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V17, P211, DOI 10.1002/ldr.698
   Haregeweyn N, 2008, CATENA, V75, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2008.04.011
   Haregeweyn N, 2015, PROG PHYS GEOG, V39, P750, DOI 10.1177/0309133315598725
   He JY, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11151809
   He Z, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11222640
   Hishe S, 2017, INT SOIL WATER CONSE, V5, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.06.005
   Huang JX, 2015, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V204, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.02.001
   Huang S, 2019, SENSORS-BASEL, V19, DOI 10.3390/s19030589
   HURNI H, 1988, MT RES DEV, V8, P123, DOI 10.2307/3673438
   Hurni H., 1993, WORLD SOIL EROSION C, P27
   Jackson TJ, 1996, HYDROLOG SCI J, V41, P517, DOI 10.1080/02626669609491523
   Jahan M, 2019, CHEM BIOL TECHNOL AG, V6, DOI 10.1186/s40538-018-0131-2
   Jenness J., 2007, KAPPA ANAL KAPPA STA
   Kebede A, 2017, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V129, P849, DOI 10.1007/s00704-016-1813-y
   Kebede Wolka Kebede Wolka, 2014, Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, V7, P185, DOI 10.3923/jest.2014.185.199
   Khalilian A., 2017, Open Journal of Soil Science, V7, P245, DOI DOI 10.4236/OJSS.2017.710018
   Kumar K, 2012, HYDROLOG SCI J, V57, P776, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2012.678583
   Kumar MJ, 2015, CYTOGENET GENOME RES, V146, P120, DOI 10.1159/000437196
   Leblanc SG, 2001, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V110, P125, DOI 10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00284-2
   LEE JS, 1980, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V2, P165, DOI 10.1109/TPAMI.1980.4766994
   Leung LR, 2011, CLIM DYNAM, V36, P57, DOI 10.1007/s00382-010-0746-x
   Li DF, 2015, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V73, P3095, DOI 10.1007/s12665-014-3604-z
   Li JH, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10091370
   Li S, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V688, P1405, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.211
   Li T, 2014, ANN BOT-LONDON, V114, P145, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcu071
   Li XZ, 2015, J HYDROL, V529, P685, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.039
   Liang J, 2016, AIMS AGRIC FOOD, V1, P175, DOI 10.3934/agrfood.2016.2.175
   Ma YY, 2016, GEODERMA, V271, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.02.003
   Mahdi Osman Mahdi Osman, 2001, Journal of Soils and Sediments, V1, P117, DOI 10.1007/BF02987717
   Mekonnen M, 2020, J SOIL SEDIMENT, V20, P2484, DOI 10.1007/s11368-020-02611-5
   Mekuria W., 2018, Advances in Plants Agriculture Research, V8, P348, DOI DOI 10.15406/APAR.2018.08.00336
   Melaku ND, 2018, CATENA, V169, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2018.05.035
   Mhiret DA, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11112299
   Mitchell AL, 2017, CARBON BAL MANAGE, V12, DOI 10.1186/s13021-017-0078-9
   Mo XG, 2017, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V8, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2017.05.007
   Myeni L, 2019, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V21, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.11.004
   Negasa DJ, 2020, APPL ENVIRON SOIL SC, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/7026929
   Nyssen J, 2004, SOIL USE MANAGE, V20, P55, DOI 10.1079/SUM2003223
   Nyssen J, 2007, SOIL TILL RES, V94, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2006.07.011
   Nyssen J, 2009, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V34, P1216, DOI 10.1002/esp.1805
   Owuor S.O., 2016, ECOL PROCESS, V5, P16, DOI DOI 10.1186/s13717-016-0060-6
   Park S, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10030447
   Plecher H, ETHIOPIA SHARE EC SE
   PREVOT L, 1993, INT J REMOTE SENS, V14, P2803, DOI 10.1080/01431169308904310
   Reis MS, 2018, LAND-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/land7020065
   REYNOLDS S G, 1970, Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), V11, P258, DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90066-1
   Ross J, 2015, GLOB HEALTH-SCI PRAC, V3, P419, DOI 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00124
   Sekaleli T.S.T, 2016, IMPACT EUCALYPTUS PL
   Seleshi Y, 2006, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V83, P181, DOI 10.1007/s00704-005-0134-3
   Sharma R, 2017, DEEP-SEA MINING: RESOURCE POTENTIAL, TECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-52557-0_1
   Sisheber B, 2022, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102670
   Small EE, 2016, IEEE J-STARS, V9, P4759, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2504527
   Sonneveld BGJS, 2011, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V26, P1161, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.05.002
   Taddese G, 2001, ENVIRON MANAGE, V27, P815, DOI 10.1007/s002670010190
   Tadesse SA, 2017, ECOL PROCESS, V6, DOI 10.1186/s13717-017-0105-5
   Tanto T., 2019, ENV SYST RES, V8, P1, DOI [10.1186/s40068-019-0142-4, DOI 10.1186/S40068-019-0142-4]
   Tao HL, 2020, SENSORS-BASEL, V20, DOI 10.3390/s20051296
   Tao LL, 2016, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V13, P816, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2016.2546945
   Taye G, 2013, PHYS GEOGR, V34, P236, DOI 10.1080/02723646.2013.832098
   Teka K, 2020, INT SOIL WATER CONSE, V8, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.iswcr.2020.06.007
   Terefe H, 2020, ECOL PROCESS, V9, DOI 10.1186/s13717-020-0216-2
   Tilahun K, 2006, J ARID ENVIRON, V64, P474, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.06.013
   Tilahun K., 1999, Ethiopian J. Nat. Resour, V1, P125
   UNEP, 1983, ECOL ENV, V3, P29
   Vital J.A., 2008, THESIS MICHIGAN TECH
   Wainwright CM, 2021, J HYDROMETEOROL, V22, P2339, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-21-0017.1
   WIEGAND CL, 1984, AGRON J, V76, P543, DOI 10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600040008x
   Xu CY, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12010183
   Yin Q, 2015, J APPL REMOTE SENS, V9, DOI 10.1117/1.JRS.9.095981
   Yirdaw E., 1996, Sustainable forestry challenges for developing countries., P327
   Yu YJ, 2002, IEEE T IMAGE PROCESS, V11, P1260, DOI [10.1109/TIP.2002.804276, 10.1109/TIP.2002.804279]
   Zheng G, 2009, SENSORS-BASEL, V9, P2719, DOI 10.3390/s90402719
   Zribi M, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11091122
NR 105
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 6
U2 23
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2077-0472
J9 AGRICULTURE-BASEL
JI Agriculture-Basel
PD MAR
PY 2022
VL 12
IS 3
AR 417
DI 10.3390/agriculture12030417
PG 24
WC Agronomy
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA 0D2KP
UT WOS:000775830000001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Sharma, A
   Dubey, VK
   Johnson, JA
   Rawal, YK
   Sivakumar, K
AF Sharma, Aashna
   Dubey, Vineet Kumar
   Johnson, Jeyaraj Antony
   Rawal, Yogesh Kumar
   Sivakumar, Kuppusamy
TI Is there always space at the top? Ensemble modeling reveals
   climate-driven high-altitude squeeze for the vulnerable snow trout
   <i>Schizothorax richardsonii</i> in Himalaya
SO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; Himalaya; Species distribution modeling; Coldwater;
   Range shift
ID FRESH-WATER FISH; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; SALMO-TRUTTA; MOLECULAR
   PHYLOGENY; OXYGEN-CONSUMPTION; THERMAL TOLERANCE; POTENTIAL IMPACTS;
   RANGE SHIFTS; HABITAT LOSS; DISTRIBUTIONS
AB Mountain systems throughout the globe are conspicuously sensitive to on-going climate alterations. This condition is much more detrimental in the Himalaya, where the rate of warming and thus the glacier meltdown is much higher than elsewhere. The Himalayan coldwater species are concerningly most vulnerable to these changes because of their limited thermal range. Whilst climate studies strongly prognosticate the altered distribution of plants and mammals in this region, the impact on coldwater fishes still remains unknown. We used snow trout (Schizothorax richardsonii), a Himalayan coldwater specialist as a model organism to predict the current suitability and climate-driven potential range shift in an ensemble-based modeling framework. We collated occurrence data from a long term, extensive field-based sampling with additional records derived from an in-depth literature survey. A comprehensive input data set including topographic, hydrogeomorphic and climatic variables were used to build correlative species distribution models for the current and future time-periods (2050 and 2070) under three-carbon emission scenarios (Representative Concentration Pathways) by integrating five General Circulation Models. Furthermore, we predicted the elevation-specific range shifts of the snow trout in response to climate change. We predict that a wide-ranging mid-elevation river network is currently suitable for the snow trout in Himalaya, however a significant part of its current distributional range would be lost over time. Our results highlight that snow trout would expand their range upwards into the high-altitude streams with a concurrent predominant range contraction in most of their lagging edges, ultimately creating a high-altitude squeeze. The net habitat loss under three RCP scenarios (RCPs 2.6, 4.5 and 8.5) was estimated to range from 7.41% to 16.29% for the year 2050 which would further increase in the year 2070 ranging from 9.46% to 26.56%. These results provide a strategic information on prioritizing climate-adaptive actions to target the currently suitable habitats and future refugia identified. Our modeling framework also provides a foremost basis to conserve not only the snow trout but also to evaluate the climate impact on several other coldwater species, which are equally vulnerable and ecologically important in the Himalaya.
C1 [Sharma, Aashna; Dubey, Vineet Kumar; Johnson, Jeyaraj Antony; Sivakumar, Kuppusamy] Wildlife Inst India, Dehra Dun 248001, Uttarakhand, India.
   [Rawal, Yogesh Kumar] Panjab Univ, Dept Zool, Chandigarh 160014, India.
C3 Wildlife Institute of India; Panjab University
RP Sivakumar, K (corresponding author), Wildlife Inst India, Dehra Dun 248001, Uttarakhand, India.
EM ksivakumar@wii.gov.in
RI Johnson, Antony/AAU-7939-2021
OI Kuppusamy, Sivakumar/0000-0002-6938-7480; Johnson,
   Antony/0000-0002-6089-6182
FU Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India under the
   National Mission for Sustaining the Himalayan Ecosystem (NMSHE) project
   (DST Grant) [DST/SPLICE/CCP/NMSHE/TF-2/WII/2014[G]]
FX This study was funded by the Department of Science and Technology (DST),
   Govt. of India under the National Mission for Sustaining the Himalayan
   Ecosystem (NMSHE) project (DST Grant Number:
   DST/SPLICE/CCP/NMSHE/TF-2/WII/2014[G]). The authors are grateful to the
   Director and Dean, WII for their encouragement and support. Special
   thanks are due to Dr. S. Sathyakumar, Nodal Scientist, NMSHE, WII for
   his advice and guidance throughout this work. We thank the Head,
   Department of Zoology, Panjab University for support. Authors also thank
   Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Sikkim forest departments and
   Indo-Tibetan Border Police for their permission and support during the
   fieldwork.
CR Ahmad S, 2020, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V21, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00845
   Akhtar MS, 2013, FISH PHYSIOL BIOCHEM, V39, P1387, DOI 10.1007/s10695-013-9793-7
   Allouche O, 2006, J APPL ECOL, V43, P1223, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x
   Almodóvar A, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P1549, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02608.x
   [Anonymous], 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014, V80, P1
   Araújo MB, 2007, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V22, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010
   Araújo MB, 2006, J BIOGEOGR, V33, P1677, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01584.x
   Araújo MB, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aat4858
   ArcGIS, 2013, ArcMap Version 10.2
   Ashok K., 2014, Research Journal of Animal, Veterinary and Fishery Sciences, V2, P1
   Austin MP, 2011, J BIOGEOGR, V38, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02416.x
   Babaluk JA, 2000, ARCTIC, V53, P161
   Bae MJ, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V639, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.001
   Bagaria P, 2020, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V22, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00926
   Baras E, 1999, J FISH BIOL, V55, P354, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1999.tb00684.x
   Barat A, 2016, FUNCT INTEGR GENOMIC, V16, P203, DOI 10.1007/s10142-016-0477-0
   Barbet-Massin M, 2012, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V3, P327, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00172.x
   Battin J, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P6720, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701685104
   Benestad R, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P697, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE3393
   Bhattacharyya S, 2019, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V19, P2423, DOI 10.1007/s10113-019-01556-x
   Bobrowski M, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10060814
   Bouska KL, 2019, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V76, P415, DOI 10.1139/cjfas-2018-0002
   Brown JH, 2004, ECOLOGY, V85, P1771, DOI 10.1890/03-9000
   Buisson L, 2008, ECOL FRESHW FISH, V17, P244, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2007.00276.x
   Cao W.X., 1981, Origin and evolution of schizothoracine Fishes in relation to the upheaval of the Xizang Plateau, in Collection in Studies on the Period, Amplitude and Type of the Uplift of the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau (in Chinese), P118
   Chatfield BS, 2010, J BIOGEOGR, V37, P593, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02246.x
   Chen IC, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P1024, DOI 10.1126/science.1206432
   Chhetri B, 2018, AVIAN BIOL RES, V11, P221, DOI 10.3184/175815618X15316676114070
   Chu C, 2005, DIVERS DISTRIB, V11, P299, DOI 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00153.x
   Comte L, 2015, DIVERS DISTRIB, V21, P1014, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12346
   Comte L, 2013, ECOGRAPHY, V36, P1236, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00282.x
   Comte L, 2013, FRESHWATER BIOL, V58, P625, DOI 10.1111/fwb.12081
   Conti L, 2015, ECOGRAPHY, V38, P510, DOI 10.1111/ecog.00753
   Devkota S, 2019, LICHENOLOGIST, V51, P157, DOI 10.1017/S002428291900001X
   Dimri AP, 2018, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V162, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2018.01.015
   Dimri AP, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V111, P775, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0201-y
   Dirnböck T, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P990, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02266.x
   Eaton JG, 1996, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V41, P1109, DOI 10.4319/lo.1996.41.5.1109
   EDDS DR, 1993, COPEIA, P48
   Elith J, 2005, ECOL MODEL, V186, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.12.007
   Elith J, 2010, METHODS ECOL EVOL, V1, P330, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00036.x
   Escobar LE, 2015, BIOL CONSERV, V191, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.040
   Everard M, 2019, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V19, P165, DOI 10.1007/s10113-018-1391-x
   Ficke AD, 2007, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V17, P581, DOI 10.1007/s11160-007-9059-5
   Filipe AF, 2013, DIVERS DISTRIB, V19, P1059, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12086
   Franklin J., 2009, Mapping species distributions - spatial inference and prediction
   Gardner AS, 2019, DIVERS DISTRIB, V25, P1318, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12939
   Georges D., 2013, EXAMPLE SPECIES DIST, V2, P92
   Grumbine RE, 2013, SCIENCE, V339, P36, DOI 10.1126/science.1227211
   Guillera-Arroita G, 2015, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V24, P276, DOI 10.1111/geb.12268
   Guisan A., 2017, Habitat Suitability and Distribution Models: With Applications in R
   Hamid M, 2019, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V28, P2345, DOI 10.1007/s10531-018-1641-8
   HANLEY JA, 1982, RADIOLOGY, V143, P29, DOI 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747
   Hao TX, 2020, ECOGRAPHY, V43, P549, DOI 10.1111/ecog.04890
   Hao TX, 2019, DIVERS DISTRIB, V25, P839, DOI 10.1111/ddi.12892
   Hari RE, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P10, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001051.x
   He DK, 2006, J BIOGEOGR, V33, P1448, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01510.x
   Heino J, 2009, BIOL REV, V84, P39, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00060.x
   Hickling R, 2006, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V12, P450, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01116.x
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   Immerzeel WW, 2010, SCIENCE, V328, P1382, DOI 10.1126/science.1183188
   Irving K, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2018.224
   Isaak DJ, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P4374, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1522429113
   Isaak DJ, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P2540, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12879
   Isaak DJ, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P742, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12073
   Jarnevich CS, 2015, ECOL INFORM, V29, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.06.007
   Jonsson B, 2009, J FISH BIOL, V75, P2381, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02380.x
   Kamalam BS, 2019, J THERM BIOL, V83, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.04.014
   Kapila Rajeev, 2002, Indian Journal of Fisheries, V49, P187
   Khadka KK, 2017, ECOL INFORM, V40, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.04.009
   La Sorte Frank A, 2010, Proc Biol Sci, V277, P3401, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.0612
   Lehner B., 2006, HYDROSHEDS TECHNICAL
   Li J, 2009, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V18, P264, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00430.x
   Luo ZH, 2015, ECOL APPL, V25, P24, DOI 10.1890/13-1499.1
   Mainali K, 2020, ECOL EVOL, V10, P1209, DOI 10.1002/ece3.5968
   Majhi SK, 2013, CURR SCI INDIA, V105, P379
   Manish K, 2016, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V2, DOI 10.1007/s40808-016-0163-1
   Marmion M, 2009, DIVERS DISTRIB, V15, P59, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00491.x
   Mccullough DA, 2009, REV FISH SCI, V17, P90, DOI 10.1080/10641260802590152
   MENON A. G. K., 1962, J ZOOL SOC INDIA, V14, P23
   Merow C, 2013, ECOGRAPHY, V36, P1058, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x
   Milner AM, 2011, ECOLOGY, V92, P1924, DOI 10.1890/10-2007.1
   Misganaw AA, 2020, EUR J TOUR HOSP RECR, V10, P1, DOI 10.2478/ejthr-2020-0001
   Mittermeier Russell A., 2004, P1
   Mohseni O, 2003, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V59, P389, DOI 10.1023/A:1024847723344
   Moss RH, 2010, NATURE, V463, P747, DOI 10.1038/nature08823
   Mungi NA, 2018, BIOL INVASIONS, V20, P1849, DOI 10.1007/s10530-018-1666-7
   Myers N, 2000, NATURE, V403, P853, DOI 10.1038/35002501
   Pandit MK, 2012, CONSERV BIOL, V26, P1061, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01918.x
   Pearson RG, 2003, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V12, P361, DOI 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00042.x
   R Core Team, 2016, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
   Radinger J, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V208, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.011
   Rahel FJ, 2008, CONSERV BIOL, V22, P521, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00950.x
   Rajput V., 2013, TAPROBANICA J, V5
   Rajvanshi A., 2012, TECHNICAL REPORT, P203
   Regmi B., 2019, THESIS
   Rieman BE, 2007, T AM FISH SOC, V136, P1552, DOI 10.1577/T07-028.1
   Ruaro R, 2019, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V836, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10750-019-3904-0
   Ruiz-Navarro A, 2016, BIOL CONSERV, V203, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.021
   Santos HDE, 2007, NEOTROP ICHTHYOL, V5, P139, DOI 10.1590/S1679-62252007000200007
   Sarkar UK, 2012, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V22, P251, DOI 10.1007/s11160-011-9218-6
   Scott CA, 2019, HINDU KUSH HIMALAYA ASSESSMENT: MOUNTAINS, CLIMATE CHANGE, SUSTAINABILITY AND PEOPLE, P257, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-92288-1_8
   Sehgal K.L., 1999, FAO Fish. Tech. Pap., V385, P89
   Sharma A., 2016, ENVIS B WILDLIFE PRO, V17, P155
   Sharma A, 2019, CURR SCI INDIA, V117, P186
   Sharma Indu, 2010, Records of the Zoological Survey of India Occasional Paper, V323, P1
   Sharma NK, 2015, J THERM BIOL, V52, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2015.07.005
   SHIMIZU A, 1991, NIPPON SUISAN GAKK, V57, P177, DOI 10.2331/suisan.57.177
   Shrestha Jiwan, 1999, FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) Fisheries Technical Paper, V385, P13
   Shrestha UB, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0106405
   Sillmann J, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V118, P2473, DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50188
   Singh H., 2014, INT J FISH AQUAT STU, V1, P108
   Solomon S, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1
   Srivastava V, 2018, ECOL MODEL, V385, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.07.001
   Su JH, 2018, ECOL EVOL, V8, P11887, DOI 10.1002/ece3.4645
   Subba B, 2018, BIOL CONSERV, V227, P352, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.09.035
   Tare V, 2017, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V13, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.07.005
   Tewari VP, 2017, FOR ECOSYST, V4, DOI 10.1186/s40663-017-0100-4
   Thapliyal Madhhu, 2012, Environment Conservation Journal, V13, P15
   Thapliyal Madhu, 2016, Environment Conservation Journal, V17, P161
   Thuiller W, 2004, ECOGRAPHY, V27, P165, DOI 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03673.x
   Thuiller W., 2013, biomod2: ensemble platform for species distribution modeling
   Thuiller W., 2012, Package "biomod 2" version 2.1.15
   Thuiller W, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-09519-w
   Thuiller W, 2009, ECOGRAPHY, V32, P369, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05742.x
   Troia MJ, 2019, ECOGRAPHY, V42, P1913, DOI 10.1111/ecog.04576
   Tyagi Lalit K., 2014, Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy Part B Biological Sciences, V84, P299, DOI 10.1007/s40011-013-0219-1
   Urban MC, 2015, SCIENCE, V348, P571, DOI 10.1126/science.aaa4984
   Vishwanath W., 2010, SCHIZOTHORAX RICHARD, DOI [10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010., DOI 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010]
   WADIA D.N., 1931, Rec. Geol. Surv, V6, P189, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ECOLMODEL.2012.07.018
   Watling JI, 2012, ECOL MODEL, V246, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.07.018
   Yang J, 2012, J ZOOL SYST EVOL RES, V50, P184, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2012.00661.x
   Yang XQ, 2013, ECOL ENG, V51, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.004
   Yousefi M, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106137
   Zhang L, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.008
   Zurick D., 2006, ILLUSTRATED ATLAS HI
NR 136
TC 32
Z9 34
U1 0
U2 20
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1470-160X
EI 1872-7034
J9 ECOL INDIC
JI Ecol. Indic.
PD JAN
PY 2021
VL 120
AR 106900
DI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106900
PG 12
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA OV0JW
UT WOS:000591908400001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Metlen, KL
   Skinner, CN
   Olson, DR
   Nichols, C
   Borgias, D
AF Metlen, Kerry L.
   Skinner, Carl N.
   Olson, Derek R.
   Nichols, Clint
   Borgias, Darren
TI Regional and local controls on historical fire regimes of dry forests
   and woodlands in the Rogue River Basin, Oregon, USA
SO FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
ID SOUTHERN CASCADE RANGE; MIXED-CONIFER FORESTS; TREE-RING RECORDS;
   PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS; SAN-PEDRO-MARTIR; CLIMATE-CHANGE; KLAMATH
   MOUNTAINS; SIERRA-NEVADA; SISKIYOU MOUNTAINS; MONTANE FORESTS
AB Fire regimes structure plant communities worldwide with regional and local factors, including anthropogenic fire management, influencing fire frequency and severity. Forests of the Rogue River Basin in Oregon, USA, are both productive and fire-prone due to ample winter precipitation and summer drought; yet management in this region is strongly influenced by forest practices that depend on fire exclusion. Regionally, climate change is increasing fire frequency, elevating the importance of understanding historically frequent-fire regimes.
   We use cross-dated fire-scars to characterize historical fire return intervals, seasonality, and relationships with climate beginning in 1650 CE for 13 sites representative of southwestern Oregon dry forests. Using systematic literature review, we link our local fire histories to a regional dataset and evaluate our data relative to more intensively studied conifer/hardwood forest types in California.
   Fire-scars show that fires in the Rogue Basin were frequent and regular until disrupted in the 1850s through 1910s, corresponding with forced displacement of Native Americans and Euro-American settlement. Median historical fire return intervals were 8 years at the stand-scale (< 25 ha), with site medians ranging from five to 14 years and no significant differences between sampled vegetation types. Burn seasonality was broadly distributed with 47% of recorded fires in the latewood (midsummer), 30% at the ring boundary (late summer and fall), and 23% in the earlywood (spring and early summer).
   The number of sites recording fire each year was associated with Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) and El Nino Southern Oscillation Index (ENSO). Fires were detected in the study area every other year, and synchrony among sites was associated with stronger annual drought. The ENSO synchronization of fire suggests an herbaceous fuel signal, with warm winters/wet summers two years prior to widespread fire-years, a pattern observed globally in fuel-limited systems.
   Stand-scale fire histories in the Klamath, southern Cascades, and northern Sierra Nevada ecoregions resemble Rogue River Basin stand-scale fire histories. Across dry mixed conifer, yellow pine, and mixed evergreen forests, fire return intervals converged on 8 years. Moist mixed conifer and red fir forests exhibited 13-year fire return intervals. Across ecoregions, fire periodicity was weakly correlated with climatic water deficit, but well-modeled by elevation, precipitation, and temperature. These data highlight the need for decadal fire and burning outside of the contemporary fire season for forest restoration and climate adaptation in the dry forests of the Rogue Basin.
C1 [Metlen, Kerry L.; Olson, Derek R.; Borgias, Darren] Nature Conservancy, Southwest Oregon Field Off, 647 Washington St, Ashland, OR 97520 USA.
   [Skinner, Carl N.] Forest Serv, USDA, Pacific Southwest Res Stn, 3644 Avtech Pkwy, Redding, CA 96002 USA.
   [Nichols, Clint] Jackson Soil & Water Conservat Dist, 89 Alder St, Central Point, OR 97502 USA.
C3 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); United States Forest
   Service
RP Metlen, KL (corresponding author), Nature Conservancy, Southwest Oregon Field Off, 647 Washington St, Ashland, OR 97520 USA.
EM kmetlen@tnc.org
FU Northwest Conservation Fund; Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board; USDI
   Bureau of Land Management
FX We thank Celeste Abbott for meticulously cross-dating the fire-scar
   samples and our many volunteers and enthusiastic field crews,
   particularly Celeste Abbott, Bob Carlson, Anna Vandervlugt, and Clement
   Stockard. Tadashi J. Moody provided plot locations for his study. This
   manuscript benefited from review by Ryan Haugo, Eric Knapp, and two
   anonymous reviewers, and review specific to historical and Native
   American perspectives from Jeff LaLande, Frank Lake, and David
   Harrelson. The work was funded by the Northwest Conservation Fund,
   Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board, and the USDI Bureau of Land
   Management. The use of commercial product names is for reference only
   and does not constitute endorsement of the product.
CR AGEE JK, 1991, NORTHWEST SCI, V65, P188
   Ager AA, 2013, ECOSPHERE, V4, DOI 10.1890/ES13-00007.1
   Allen CD, 2002, ECOL APPL, V12, P1418
   Allen CD, 2008, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V17, P115, DOI 10.1071/WF07165
   Anderson M.Kat., 2005, TENDING WILD
   [Anonymous], 2001, TreeRing Research
   [Anonymous], 1996, MULTIPLE COMP, DOI DOI 10.1201/B15074
   [Anonymous], 1996, R6NRECOLTP1796 USDA
   [Anonymous], 2017, GEN TECHNICAL REPORT
   Baker WL, 2006, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V15, P433, DOI 10.1071/WF06047
   Baker WL, 2018, ECOL APPL, V28, P284, DOI 10.1002/eap.1688
   Baker WL, 2014, ECOSPHERE, V5, DOI 10.1890/ES14-00046.1
   Baker WL, 2012, ECOSPHERE, V3, DOI 10.1890/ES11-00320.1
   Barrett S., 2010, IN TERAGENCY FIRE RE
   Beaty RM, 2007, J VEG SCI, V18, P879, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02604.x
   Beaty RM, 2001, J BIOGEOGR, V28, P955, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00591.x
   Bekker MF, 2001, PLANT ECOL, V155, P15, DOI 10.1023/A:1013263212092
   Bowman DMJS, 2009, SCIENCE, V324, P481, DOI 10.1126/science.1163886
   Boyd Robert., 1999, INDIANS FIRE LAND PA, P94
   Briffa KR., 2002, DATA CONTRIBUTION SE, V2007
   Briles CE, 2005, QUATERNARY RES, V64, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.yqres.2005.03.001
   Collins B., 2010, LANDSCAPE ECOL, P1
   Collins B.M., 2007, FIRE ECOL, V3, P53, DOI [10.4996/fireecology.0302053, DOI 10.4996/FIREECOLOGY.0302053]
   Colombaroli D, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P18909, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1007692107
   Connolly ThomasJ., 1988, J CALIFORNIA GREAT B, V10, P246
   Cook E. R., 2000, IGBP PAGES WORLD DAT, V2000-052
   Cook ER., 2004, N AM DROUGHT ATLAS G
   Covington WW, 1997, J FOREST, V95, P23
   Crawford JN, 2015, HOLOCENE, V25, P1341, DOI 10.1177/0959683615584205
   D'Arrigo R, 2005, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V32, DOI 10.1029/2004GL022055
   Daly C, 2008, INT J CLIMATOL, V28, P2031, DOI 10.1002/joc.1688
   Davis FW, 2016, ECOSPHERE, V7, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1573
   DAVIS FW, 1990, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V4, P69, DOI 10.1007/BF02573952
   Davis RJ, 2015, PNWGTR911 USFS
   DellaSala DA, 1999, NAT AREA J, V19, P300
   DETLING LE, 1961, ECOLOGY, V42, P348, DOI 10.2307/1932085
   Dettinger MD, 1998, J CLIMATE, V11, P3095, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<3095:NSPPIW>2.0.CO;2
   Dipaolo Dominic A., 2015, Madrono, V62, P101, DOI 10.3120/0024-9637-62.2.101
   Dobrowski SZ, 2013, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V19, P241, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12026
   Donato DC, 2009, J ECOL, V97, P142, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01456.x
   Douglas County Planning Department, 2017, COMMUNITY WILDFIRE P
   Douthit Nathan., 2002, UNCERTAIN ENCOUNTERS
   Duren OC, 2012, NORTHWEST SCI, V86, P310, DOI 10.3955/046.086.0407
   EMMINGHAM W H, 1977, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, V7, P154, DOI 10.1139/x77-022
   Falk DA, 2011, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V9, P446, DOI 10.1890/100052
   Farris CA, 2013, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V22, P1021, DOI 10.1071/WF13026
   Farris CA, 2010, ECOL APPL, V20, P1598, DOI 10.1890/09-1535.1
   Ford KR, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P3348, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13690
   Ford KR, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P3712, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13328
   Forrestel AB, 2017, FIRE ECOL, V13, P1, DOI 10.4996/fireecology.1301001
   Franklin JF, 2012, J FOREST, V110, P429, DOI 10.5849/jof.10-006
   Fry DL, 2006, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V223, P428, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.021
   Fulé PZ, 2006, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V15, P439, DOI 10.1071/WF06048
   Fulé PZ, 2014, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V23, P825, DOI 10.1111/geb.12136
   Fulé PZ, 2003, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V12, P129, DOI 10.1071/WF02060
   Golladay SW, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V360, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.10.009
   Gray D.J., 1987, U OREGON ANTHR PAPER
   Gutsell SL, 1996, CAN J FOREST RES, V26, P166, DOI 10.1139/x26-020
   Halofsky JE, 2011, ECOSPHERE, V2, DOI 10.1890/ES10-00184.1
   Halofsky J. E., 2014, PNWGTR896 USFS
   Halofsky JE, 2016, FORESTS, V7, DOI 10.3390/f7110268
   Harris L, 2017, ECOSPHERE, V8, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2019
   Haugo R, 2015, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V335, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.09.014
   Hessburg PF, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V366, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.034
   Hessl AE, 2004, ECOL APPL, V14, P425, DOI 10.1890/03-5019
   Heyerdahl EK, 2001, ECOLOGY, V82, P660, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0660:SCOHFR]2.0.CO;2
   Heyerdahl EK, 2008, ECOLOGY, V89, P705, DOI 10.1890/06-2047.1
   Hickman O. E., 2011, HIST VEGETATION CENT
   Higgs E, 2014, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V12, P499, DOI 10.1890/110267
   Higuera PE, 2005, HOLOCENE, V15, P238, DOI 10.1191/0959683605hl789rp
   Higuera PE, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0127563
   Higuera PE, 2010, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V19, P996, DOI 10.1071/WF09134
   Hosten PaulE., 2006, Restoring the Pacific Northwest: The Art and Science of Ecological Restoration in Cascadia, P63
   Jenness J., 2006, Topographic Position Index (tpi_jen.avx) extension for ArcView 3.x, v.1.3 a.Jenness Enterprises
   Johnston JD, 2016, ECOSPHERE, V7, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1581
   Kane VR, 2015, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V338, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.038
   KATZ RW, 1988, J CLIMATOL, V8, P241, DOI 10.1002/joc.3370080303
   Kent LLY, 2017, ECOSPHERE, V8, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1709
   Klausmeyer KR, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006392
   Krawchuk MA, 2011, ECOLOGY, V92, P121, DOI 10.1890/09-1843.1
   LaLande J., 1989, PREHISTORY SW OREGON
   LaLande Jeff., 1999, Indians, Fire, and the Land in the Pacific Northwest, P255
   LANDFIRE, 2008, BIOPH SETT LAYER LAN
   Lauvaux CA, 2016, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V363, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.12.016
   Lee EH, 2016, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V221, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.02.009
   Leiberg J. B., 1900, CASCADE RANGE ASHLAN, P20024
   Levine CR, 2017, ECOL APPL, V27, P1498, DOI 10.1002/eap.1543
   Littell JS, 2010, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V102, P129, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9858-x
   Littell JS, 2009, ECOL APPL, V19, P1003, DOI 10.1890/07-1183.1
   Long J. W., 2016, PSWGTR252 USFS
   Long JW., 2014, SCI SYNTHESIS SUPPOR
   Lutz JA, 2010, J BIOGEOGR, V37, P936, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02268.x
   Lydersen JM, 2017, ECOL APPL, V27, P2013, DOI 10.1002/eap.1586
   Lydersen JM, 2014, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V328, P326, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.005
   Mann ML, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0153589
   Marlon JR, 2013, QUATERNARY SCI REV, V65, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.11.029
   Marlon JR, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, pE535, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1112839109
   McAfee SA, 2016, INT J CLIMATOL, V36, P508, DOI 10.1002/joc.4351
   McKenzie D, 2017, ECOL APPL, V27, P26, DOI 10.1002/eap.1420
   McKinley DC, 2011, ECOL APPL, V21, P1902, DOI 10.1890/10-0697.1
   MCNEIL R C, 1980, Northwest Science, V54, P30
   Messier MS, 2012, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V264, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.003
   Millar CI, 2015, SCIENCE, V349, P823, DOI 10.1126/science.aaa9933
   Miller A., 2002, MONOGRAPHS STAT APPL, V2nd
   Miller JD, 2012, ECOL APPL, V22, P184, DOI 10.1890/10-2108.1
   Miller R., 2003, FIRE REGIMES PRE POS
   Minor R., 2014, J CALIFORNIA GREAT B, V34, P247
   Moody T.J., 2006, FIRE ECOL, V2, P115, DOI 10.4996/fireecology.0201115
   Moritz MA, 2014, NATURE, V515, P58, DOI 10.1038/nature13946
   Norman SP, 2005, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V215, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.003
   Norman SP, 2003, J BIOGEOGR, V30, P1081, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00889.x
   Odion DC, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0087852
   Omernik JM, 2014, ENVIRON MANAGE, V54, P1249, DOI 10.1007/s00267-014-0364-1
   Oregon Department of Forestry, 2017, FIR STAT
   Perry DA, 2011, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V262, P703, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.004
   Prichard SJ, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V396, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.035
   Pullen R., 1996, OVERVIEW ENV NATIVE
   Reilly MJ, 2017, ECOSPHERE, V8, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1695
   Ricketts T., 1999, A conservation Assessment of the Terrestrial Ecoregions of North America, Volume I
   Riegel G., 2018, FIRE CALIFORNIAS ECO, P221
   RIEGEL GM, 1992, NORTHWEST SCI, V66, P66
   Rockweit JT, 2017, ECOLOGY, V98, P1574, DOI 10.1002/ecy.1805
   Ryan KC, 2013, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V11, pE15, DOI 10.1890/120329
   Schoennagel T, 2005, ECOL APPL, V15, P2000, DOI 10.1890/04-1579
   Sensenig T, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V291, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.006
   Skinner C. N., 2003, FIRE C 2000 1 NATL C, VNo. 13, P145
   Skinner C.N., 2009, Fire Ecology, V5, P73
   Skinner CN, 2006, FIRE IN CALIFORNIA'S ECOSYSTEMS, P170
   Skinner CN, 2006, FIRE IN CALIFORNIA'S ECOSYSTEMS, P195
   Skinner CN., 2002, Proceedings of the symposium on the ecology and management of dead wood in western forests, P445
   Stephens JL, 2015, CONDOR, V117, P430, DOI 10.1650/CONDOR-14-58.1
   Stephens SL, 2013, SCIENCE, V342, P41, DOI 10.1126/science.1240294
   Stephens SL, 2015, ECOSPHERE, V6, DOI 10.1890/ES14-00379.1
   Stephens SL, 2010, CAN J FOREST RES, V40, P1497, DOI 10.1139/X10-083
   Stephens SL, 2004, NORTHWEST SCI, V78, P12
   Stephens SL, 2003, CAN J FOREST RES, V33, P1090, DOI [10.1139/x03-031, 10.1139/X03-031]
   Stevens JT, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0147688
   Stokes M.A., 1968, Tree-Ring Dating
   Swetnam T. W., 1985, USDA AGR HDB
   Swetnam TW, 2008, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V17, P1, DOI 10.1071/WF08016
   Swetnam TW, 2003, ECOL STU AN, V160, P158
   Taylor AH, 2008, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V17, P60, DOI 10.1071/WF07033
   Taylor AH, 1998, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V111, P285, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00342-9
   Taylor AH, 2003, ECOL APPL, V13, P704, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0704:SPACOH]2.0.CO;2
   Taylor AH, 2000, J BIOGEOGR, V27, P87, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00353.x
   Taylor AH, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P13684, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1609775113
   Taylor AH, 2010, J VEG SCI, V21, P561, DOI 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01164.x
   Tepley AJ, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P4117, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13704
   Teske CC, 2012, FIRE ECOL, V8, P82, DOI 10.4996/fireecology.0802082
   Thompson JR, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P10743, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0700229104
   Thompson JR, 2010, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V25, P775, DOI 10.1007/s10980-010-9456-3
   Trouet V, 2010, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V37, DOI 10.1029/2009GL041695
   Trouet V, 2009, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V95, P349, DOI 10.1007/s00704-008-0012-x
   *US FISH WILDL SER, 2011, REV REC PLAN NO SPOT
   Van de Water KM, 2011, FIRE ECOL, V7, P26, DOI 10.4996/fireecology.0703026
   Van Horne ML, 2006, CAN J FOREST RES, V36, P855, DOI 10.1139/X05-289
   van Mantgem PJ, 2013, ECOL LETT, V16, P1151, DOI 10.1111/ele.12151
   Vander Schaaf Dick., 2004, Klamath Mountains ecoregional conservation assessment
   Walling A.G., 1884, HIST SO OREGON COMPR
   WARING R H, 1969, Northwest Science, V43, P1
   Waring R. H., 1970, REGENERATION PONDERO, P54
   Watson E, 2002, CAN J FOREST RES, V32, P1858, DOI [10.1139/x02-096, 10.1139/X02-096]
   Weisberg PJ, 2003, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V172, P17, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00805-2
   Westerling AL, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P940, DOI 10.1126/science.1128834
   White A, 2015, QUATERNARY RES, V84, P348, DOI 10.1016/j.yqres.2015.09.007
   Whitlock C, 2004, CAN J FOREST RES, V34, P2110, DOI 10.1139/X04-084
   Whitlock C, 2008, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V17, P72, DOI 10.1071/WF07025
   Williams MA, 2012, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V21, P1042, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00750.x
   Wise EK, 2010, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V37, DOI 10.1029/2009GL042193
   Wright CS, 2004, ECOL APPL, V14, P443, DOI 10.1890/02-5349
   Yocom LL, 2014, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V23, P959, DOI 10.1071/WF13214
NR 171
TC 28
Z9 34
U1 2
U2 54
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0378-1127
EI 1872-7042
J9 FOREST ECOL MANAG
JI For. Ecol. Manage.
PD DEC 15
PY 2018
VL 430
BP 43
EP 58
DI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.07.010
PG 16
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA GZ1OL
UT WOS:000449137300005
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Derner, J
   Briske, D
   Reeves, M
   Brown-Brandl, T
   Meehan, M
   Blumenthal, D
   Travis, W
   Augustine, D
   Wilmer, H
   Scasta, D
   Hendrickson, J
   Volesky, J
   Edwards, L
   Peck, D
AF Derner, Justin
   Briske, David
   Reeves, Matt
   Brown-Brandl, Tami
   Meehan, Miranda
   Blumenthal, Dana
   Travis, William
   Augustine, David
   Wilmer, Hailey
   Scasta, Derek
   Hendrickson, John
   Volesky, Jerry
   Edwards, Laura
   Peck, Dannele
TI Vulnerability of grazing and confined livestock in the Northern Great
   Plains to projected mid- and late-twenty-first century climate
SO CLIMATIC CHANGE
LA English
DT Article
ID FEEDLOT CATTLE; ELEVATED CO2; HEAT-STRESS; TRANSFORMATIONAL ADAPTATION;
   RANGELAND MANAGEMENT; SEMIARID GRASSLAND; RIPARIAN ZONES; FORAGE
   QUALITY; LAND-USE; STRATEGIES
AB The Northern Great Plains (NGP) region of the USA-which comprises Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska-is a largely rural area that provides numerous ecosystem services, including livestock products, cultural services, and conservation of biological diversity. The region contains 25% of the Nation's beef cattle and approximately one-third of the confined beef cattle, as well as the largest remaining native prairie in the US-the Northern Mixedgrass Prairie. With rising atmospheric CO2, the NGP is projected to experience warmer and longer growing seasons, greater climatic variability, and more extreme events (e.g., increased occurrence of large precipitation events). These climatic changes may affect livestock production both directly via physiological impacts on animals and indirectly via modifications to forage, invasion of undesirable plants, and increased exposure to parasites. This raises concerns about the vulnerability of grazing livestock operations and confined livestock operations to projected changes in mid- (2050) and late- (2085) twenty-first century climate. Our objectives are to (1) describe the NGP's exposure to temperature and precipitation trends, inter-annual variability, and extreme events; (2) evaluate the sensitivity of beef cattle production to direct and indirect effects imposed by these projected climatic changes; and (3) provide a typology of adaptation strategies to minimize adverse consequences of projected changes and maximize beneficial consequences. Agricultural managers have developed considerable adaptive capacity to contend with environmental and economic variability. However, projected climatic changes, especially the increased frequency and magnitude of weather extremes, will require even greater adaptive capacity to maintain viable production systems. Consequently, regional vulnerability to projected climatic changes will be determined not only by ecological responses but also by the adaptive capacity of individual managers. Adaptive capacity in the NGP will differ from other regions, in part because projections suggest some opportunities for increased livestock production. Adaptations in both grazing and confined beef cattle systems will require enhanced decision-making skills capable of integrating biophysical, social, and economic considerations. Social learning networks that support integration of experimental and experiential knowledge-such as lessons learned from early adopters and involvement with science-based organizations-can help enhance decision-making and climate adaptation planning. Many adaptations have already been implemented by a subset of producers in this region, providing opportunities for assessment, further development, and greater adoption. Context-specific decision-making can also be enhanced through science-management partnerships, which aim to build adaptive capacity that recognizes multiple production and conservation/environmental goals.
C1 [Derner, Justin] USDA ARS, 8408 Hildreth Rd, Cheyenne, WY 82009 USA.
   [Briske, David] Texas A&M Univ, Centeq Bldg,Rm 130C,MS2120 TAMU, College Stn, TX 77843 USA.
   [Reeves, Matt] USDA FS, 800 E Beckwith, Missoula, MT 59801 USA.
   [Brown-Brandl, Tami] USDA ARS, State Spur 18D, Clay Ctr, NE 68933 USA.
   [Meehan, Miranda] North Dakota State Univ, 1300 Albrecht Blvd,Hultz Hall, Fargo, ND USA.
   [Blumenthal, Dana; Augustine, David; Wilmer, Hailey; Peck, Dannele] USDA ARS, 1701 Ctr Ave, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA.
   [Travis, William] Univ Colorado Boulder, Western Water Assoc, 216 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.
   [Scasta, Derek] Univ Wyoming, Agr Bldg 2004,1000 E Univ Ave, Laramie, WY 82071 USA.
   [Hendrickson, John] USDA ARS, POB 459, Mandan, ND 58554 USA.
   [Volesky, Jerry] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, WCREC, 402 W State Farm Rd, North Platte, NE 69101 USA.
   [Edwards, Laura] South Dakota State Univ, Brookings, SD 57007 USA.
C3 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); Texas A&M University
   System; Texas A&M University College Station; United States Department
   of Agriculture (USDA); United States Forest Service; United States
   Department of Agriculture (USDA); North Dakota State University Fargo;
   United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); University of Colorado
   System; University of Colorado Boulder; University of Wyoming; United
   States Department of Agriculture (USDA); University of Nebraska System;
   University of Nebraska Lincoln; South Dakota State University
RP Derner, J (corresponding author), USDA ARS, 8408 Hildreth Rd, Cheyenne, WY 82009 USA.
EM Justin.Derner@ars.usda.gov; dbriske@tamu.edu; mreeves@fs.fed.us;
   tami.brownbrandl@ars.usda.gov; Miranda.meehan@ndsu.edu;
   dana.blumenthal@ars.usda.gov; William.travis@colorado.edu;
   david.augustine@ars.usda.gov; hailey.wilmer@ars.usda.gov;
   jscasta@uwyo.edu; john.hendrickson@ars.usda.gov; jerry.volesky@unl.edu;
   laura.edwards@sdstate.edu; dannele.peck@ars.usda.gov
RI Brown-Brandl, Tami/AAI-2132-2019; Hendrickson, John/M-1999-2019;
   Augustine, David/H-6167-2011; Brown-Brandl, Tami/B-8187-2015
OI Brown-Brandl, Tami/0000-0002-0874-8035; Augustine,
   David/0000-0003-3144-0466; Derner, Justin/0000-0001-8076-0736; Peck,
   Dannele/0000-0001-5464-8097; Meehan, Miranda/0000-0002-7290-467X;
   Travis, William/0000-0002-9197-1317
CR Adger WN, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
   [Anonymous], 2012, Census of Agriculture
   Badeck FW, 2004, NEW PHYTOL, V162, P295, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01059.x
   Bailey DW, 2015, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V68, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.rama.2015.02.001
   Bear DA, 2012, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V65, P119, DOI 10.2111/REM-D-11-00133.1
   Blumenthal DM, 2016, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V22, P3026, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13278
   Blumenthal DM, 2013, NEW PHYTOL, V200, P1156, DOI 10.1111/nph.12459
   Bradley BA, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P1511, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01824.x
   Briske DD, 2015, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V152, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.036
   Brown-Brandl TM, 2013, T ASABE, V56, P1563
   Brown-Brandl TM, 2010, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V54, P609, DOI 10.1007/s00484-009-0282-8
   Busby D., 1996, IOWA STATE U, VR1348, P108
   Chambers PA, 2012, J ENVIRON QUAL, V41, P1, DOI 10.2134/jeq2011.0338
   Dantas-Torres F, 2015, INT J PARASITOL-PAR, V4, P452, DOI 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.07.001
   Davis MS, 2003, J ANIM SCI, V81, P649
   Derner J. D., 2016, Rangelands, V38, P211
   Derner JD, 2012, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V65, P623, DOI 10.2111/REM-D-11-00122.1
   Derner JD, 2009, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V62, P111, DOI 10.2111/08-008.1
   Didier EA, 2004, J RANGE MANAGE, V57, P330, DOI 10.2307/4003855
   Dumont B, 2015, GRASS FORAGE SCI, V70, P239, DOI 10.1111/gfs.12169
   Evans SG, 2004, J RANGE MANAGE, V57, P539, DOI 10.2307/4003985
   Frost R., 2012, RANGELANDS, V34, P2
   Gaughan JB, 2010, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V54, P617, DOI 10.1007/s00484-009-0233-4
   Goulson D, 2005, J APPL ECOL, V42, P795, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01078.x
   GREGORY SV, 1991, BIOSCIENCE, V41, P540, DOI 10.2307/1311607
   Grudzinski BP, 2016, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V52, P16, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12364
   Hallegatte S, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.12.003
   Hamilton TW, 2016, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V69, P465, DOI 10.1016/j.rama.2016.06.008
   Hammond AC, 1998, J ANIM SCI, V76, P1568
   Heisler-White JL, 2009, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V15, P2894, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01961.x
   Hoberg EP, 2008, REV SCI TECH OIE, V27, P511, DOI 10.20506/rst.27.2.1818
   Howden SM, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P19691, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701890104
   Izaurralde RC, 2011, AGRON J, V103, P371, DOI 10.2134/agronj2010.0304
   Joyce LA, 2013, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V66, P512, DOI 10.2111/REM-D-12-00142.1
   Kachergis E, 2014, ECOSPHERE, V5, DOI 10.1890/ES13-00402.1
   Kates RW, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P7156, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1115521109
   KHALEEL R, 1981, J ENVIRON QUAL, V10, P133, DOI 10.2134/jeq1981.00472425001000020002x
   Krasfur ES, 1997, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V42, P503, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.503
   Lark TJ, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, DOI [10.1088/1748-9326/10/4/04.4003, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/4/04.4003]
   Lysyk TJ, 1999, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V28, P387, DOI 10.1093/ee/28.3.387
   Mader TL, 2006, J ANIM SCI, V84, P712, DOI 10.2527/2006.843712x
   Mader TL, 1997, J ANIM SCI, V75, P26
   Marshall NA, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.10.003
   Marshall NA, 2013, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V66, P88, DOI 10.2111/REM-D-11-00176.1
   McCartney D, 2004, CAN J ANIM SCI, V84, P511, DOI 10.4141/A03-069
   Milchunas DG, 2005, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V111, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2005.06.014
   Mortenson MC, 2005, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V58, P505, DOI 10.2111/1551-5028(2005)58[505:FPAQOA]2.0.CO;2
   Moss R., 2014, Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessmentk, DOI [DOI 10.7930/J0H12ZXG, 10.7930/J0H12ZXG]
   Müller B, 2011, ECOL ECON, V70, P2137, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.011
   Mueller KE, 2016, ECOL LETT, V19, P956, DOI 10.1111/ele.12634
   Nardone A, 2010, LIVEST SCI, V130, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.011
   Nelson DR, 2007, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V32, P395, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
   Nelson R, 2010, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V13, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.09.006
   Peinetti HR, 2011, ECOSPHERE, V2, DOI 10.1890/ES11-00021.1
   Pierce DW, 2015, J HYDROMETEOROL, V16, P2421, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0236.1
   Pierce DW, 2014, J HYDROMETEOROL, V15, P2558, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0082.1
   Polley HW, 2013, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V66, P493, DOI 10.2111/REM-D-12-00068.1
   Rashford BS, 2016, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V16, P515, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0768-3
   Reeves MC, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V126, P429, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1235-8
   Reyes-Fox M, 2014, NATURE, V510, P259, DOI 10.1038/nature13207
   Rickards L, 2012, CROP PASTURE SCI, V63, P240, DOI 10.1071/CP11172
   Rinella MJ, 2016, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V69, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.rama.2016.02.001
   Ritten JP, 2010, AM J AGR ECON, V92, P1242, DOI 10.1093/ajae/aaq052
   Roche LM, 2015, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V68, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.rama.2015.03.011
   Rose H, 2015, ECOL MODEL, V297, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.11.033
   Ryberg KR, 2016, HYDROL PROCESS, V30, P1208, DOI 10.1002/hyp.10693
   Scasta JD, 2017, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V46, P191, DOI 10.1093/ee/nvw171
   Scasta JD, 2015, J INTEGR PEST MANAG, V6, DOI 10.1093/jipm/pmv008
   Shafroth PB, 2002, ECOL APPL, V12, P107, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0107:RVRTAD]2.0.CO;2
   St-Pierre NR, 2003, J DAIRY SCI, V86, pE52, DOI 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74040-5
   Stockton M. C., 2007, Professional Animal Scientist, V23, P500
   Tolleson DR, 2014, J ANIM SCI, V92, P349, DOI 10.2527/jas.2013-6631
   Torell LA, 2010, RANGELAND ECOL MANAG, V63, P415, DOI 10.2111/REM-D-09-00131.1
   Troy TJ, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/5/054013
   Vincent K, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.009
   Wright CK, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P4134, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1215404110
NR 76
TC 58
Z9 67
U1 3
U2 59
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 0165-0009
EI 1573-1480
J9 CLIMATIC CHANGE
JI Clim. Change
PD JAN
PY 2018
VL 146
IS 1-2
SI SI
BP 19
EP 32
DI 10.1007/s10584-017-2029-6
PG 14
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA FU2VH
UT WOS:000423707600003
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Lei, YL
   Zhou, HT
   Li, QQ
   Liu, YG
   Li, J
   Wang, C
AF Lei, Yalun
   Zhou, Hongtao
   Li, Qingqing
   Liu, Yigang
   Li, Ji
   Wang, Chuan
TI Investigation and Evaluation of Insolation and Ventilation Conditions of
   Streetscapes of Traditional Settlements in Subtropical China
SO BUILDINGS
LA English
DT Article
DE traditional settlements; climate-adaptive design; the subtropical
   climate; streetscapes; insolation and ventilation condition;
   topographical features
ID OUTDOOR THERMAL COMFORT; IMPROVE
AB Global warming, the urban heat island effect (UHI), and the risks of fossil fuel depletion necessitate a re-evaluation of traditional settlements that have been adapted to local climatic conditions, topography, and available resources, including materials and construction methods, through passive strategies to achieve thermal comfort. Although vernacular settlements have received considerable attention, few have examined and evaluated their streetscapes. This study investigates the impact of topographical features and architectural forms on insolation and ventilation conditions in traditional settlements in China's southern subtropical climate. The aim is to explore traditional planning configurations of streetscapes at different altitudes to identify architectural forms and planning strategies that effectively improve outdoor users' thermal comfort conditions. For this purpose, case studies are conducted on three traditional settlements in Lingnan; the Lingnan region has a typical subtropical climate in southern China. The chosen cases represent the main features of different topographical conditions, architectural forms, and climate zones in the Lingnan. We systematically simulated the insolation and ventilation in these settlements' streetscapes on a monthly and quarterly basis and analyzed their sunlight hours, incident solar radiation, shading percentages, sky view factors (SVF), and wind speed. The findings show the following: (1) Specific terrains can affect streetscapes' shading percentages and wind speed. The mountain settlement (With an average elevation of 600 m) is located on a southeast-facing slope (10 degrees < slope < 20 degrees). It receives an additional 10% of incident solar radiation compared to gentle terrain. (2) Compared to settlements located in coastal hills and mountainous, plain settlements have better shading and ventilation conditions in streetscapes. In terms of insolation, plain settlements have denser building configurations and narrower, elongated street corridors with a height-to-width ratio (H/W) = 1.9 similar to 5.5 (the height-width ratio value as street's H/W (H = height, W = width); note that it is unitless), which can generate greater lower SVF (44.5%), and shading percentages (63.6%). Regarding ventilation, it is easier to create a "cool lane" (i) when the main street, oriented towards the dominant wind direction in summer, forms an angle <30 degrees with it, (ii) when the primary street follows a NE-SW longitudinal orientation, while SE-NW horizontal streets intersect and weave through it, and (iii) with a H/W = 3 similar to 4 resulting in wind speeds of 2.9 similar to 4.0 m/s. (3) All the streetscapes have overshadowing occurring in winter; similarly, varying sizes of calm wind zones are created in summer. To alleviate these issues, widening the streetscapes along the buildings can permit solar penetration and natural ventilation. (4) In summer, installing shading devices along the horizontal plane of covered street corridors with a H/W = 1 similar to 4 and N-S longitudinal orientation can provide an additional shading of 3.6-22%.
C1 [Lei, Yalun; Zhou, Hongtao] Tongji Univ, Coll Design & Innovat, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Qingqing; Liu, Yigang] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Art & Design, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Ji] Nanjing Vocat Univ Ind Technol, Coll Art & Design, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Chuan] Zhejiang Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Design & Fash, Hangzhou 310023, Peoples R China.
C3 Tongji University; Nanjing Forestry University; Nanjing Vocational
   University of Industry Technology; Zhejiang University of Science &
   Technology
RP Zhou, HT (corresponding author), Tongji Univ, Coll Design & Innovat, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China.
EM 22310129@tongji.edu.cn; zhouhongtao@tongji.edu.cn;
   jiangzhishu@njfu.edu.cn; neal_liu@njfu.edu.cn; moonlight202106@126.com;
   wangdachuan3781@gmail.com
OI Zhou, Hongtao/0000-0001-8508-495X; Lei, Yalun/0000-0002-0310-6850; Liu,
   Yigang/0000-0003-2735-1882
FU Office of the Leading Group for Shanghai Art Science Planning
   [YB2022-F-088]
FX This research was funded by the Office of the Leading Group for Shanghai
   Art Science Planning (2022 Shanghai Art Science Planning Project, Grant
   number: YB2022-F-088).
CR Aboelata A, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V172, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106712
   Nguyen AT, 2019, FRONT ARCHIT RES, V8, P535, DOI 10.1016/j.foar.2019.07.006
   Antoniadis D, 2018, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V62, P2025, DOI 10.1007/s00484-018-1612-5
   Bai LJ, 2019, ENERGY, V170, P709, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.187
   chinesestandard.net, CHINESE LIGHTING DES
   Cui L, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V276, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124266
   Cui P, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V92, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104484
   de Dear R, 2020, ENERG BUILDINGS, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109893
   Du Yan, 2023, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/2468/1/012163
   Fan WH, 2023, ENERGIES, V16, DOI 10.3390/en16114501
   Galal OM, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V184, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107222
   Ge JJ, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V210, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108707
   Guo PY, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/buildings12050629
   Hegazy IR, 2020, INT J LOW-CARBON TEC, V15, P594, DOI 10.1093/ijlct/ctaa028
   Hermawan H, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14031818
   Hu M, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101466
   Huang JX, 2020, ENERG BUILDINGS, V207, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109580
   Jiang YJ, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12031046
   Jiang YF, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16060952
   Jiang YF, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10093189
   Kaihoul A, 2021, J BUILD ENG, V43, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103023
   Lai DY, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V661, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.062
   Lam CKC, 2023, BUILD ENVIRON, V228, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109743
   Lei YL, 2022, MATH PROBL ENG, V2022, DOI 10.1155/2022/6293833
   Li W, 2022, J BUILD ENG, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104082
   Li YLX, 2023, ENERGIES, V16, DOI 10.3390/en16041980
   Ma HX, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V208, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108640
   Mostafavi F, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V206, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108329
   National Meteorological Information Center, About us
   Nawrath M, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V190, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103598
   Nie Q, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106248
   Osman MM, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101429
   Patandianan MV, 2020, FRONT ARCHIT RES, V9, P641, DOI 10.1016/j.foar.2020.05.006
   Philokyprou M, 2021, INT J ARCHIT HERIT, V15, P1741, DOI 10.1080/15583058.2020.1719235
   Rogelj J, 2021, NATURE, V591, P365, DOI 10.1038/d41586-021-00662-3
   Sarkar A, 2020, CITIES, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102840
   Slorach PC, 2021, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V230, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113838
   Xie YX, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V132, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.01.025
   Xiong MH, 2022, APPL SCI-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/app12147105
   Xiong Y, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104136
   Xu GY, 2020, ENERGY, V195, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117045
   Yang L, 2020, ENERG BUILDINGS, V209, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109678
   Yang W., 2022, J BUILD ENG, V53, P104514, DOI [10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104514, DOI 10.1016/J.JOBE.2022.104514]
   Yildirim M, 2020, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106318
   Ying X., 2023, HELIYON, V9, pe13051, DOI [10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13051, DOI 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E13051]
   Ying XY, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10.3390/en13020406
   Zhang XF, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/buildings12091332
   Zhang Y., 2021, P INT C SMART TRANSP, VVolume 12050, P805
   Zhen M, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/buildings12040476
NR 49
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 7
U2 30
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2075-5309
J9 BUILDINGS-BASEL
JI BUILDINGS-BASEL
PD JUL
PY 2023
VL 13
IS 7
AR 1611
DI 10.3390/buildings13071611
PG 22
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
GA N6MG3
UT WOS:001038123300001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Goda, AMAS
   Aboseif, AM
   Mohammedy, EY
   Taha, MKS
   Mansour, AIA
   Ramadan, EA
   Aboushabana, NM
   Zaher, MM
   Otazus, NI
   Ashour, M
AF Goda, Ashraf M. A. -S.
   Aboseif, Ahmed M.
   Mohammedy, Eman Y.
   Taha, Mostafa K. S.
   Mansour, Ahmed I. A.
   Ramadan, Enas A.
   Aboushabana, Nevine M.
   Zaher, Marwa M.
   Otazus, Nora Ibanes
   Ashour, Mohamed
TI Earthen pond-based floating beds for rice-fish co-culture as a novel
   concept for climate adaptation, water efficiency improvement, nitrogen
   and phosphorus management
SO AQUACULTURE
LA English
DT Article
DE Aquaculture; Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus; African catfish Clarias
   gariepinus; Earthen Pond -based Floating Bed (EPFB); Water use
   efficiency
ID CATFISH RHAMDIA-QUELEN; PERFORMANCE; GROWTH; SYSTEM; YIELD
AB The current study was carried out to evaluate and investigate a unique rice/fish-polyculture as Integrated Aquaculture-Agriculture Systems (IAAS) model established in Egypt, using Earthen Pond-based Floating Bed (EPFB). This novel idea is intended to improve Water, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus Use Efficiency (WUE, NUE, and PUE, respectively). Three experiments were carried out in this investigation. The first and second experiments investigated the effects of rice planting density (20, 25, and 30 plant m2) and rice seed germination methods (Styrofoam Trays Technique, SFT; Directly Outside Germination method, DOG, and Outside Germination for 24 h, 24 h-OG) on rice characteristics, N-contents, P-contents, N-retention, and P-retention of different rice parts. While the third trial, which lasted 90 days, assessed the impact of the EPFB on rice production characteristics, fish growth performances, and nutrient utilization efficiency (N-, P-contents, and retentions) in comparison to Traditional Rice Cultivation (TRC). In terms of rice production characteristics, 30 plants m- 2 had the highest significant (p < 0.05) yield values. A density of 20 plants m- 2 produced the highest N-contents and total dietary P-content values in rice stem and leaf, whereas a density of 30 plant m- 2 produced the highest total dietary Nretention and P-content values. The SFT approach produced the most significant results in terms of rice production variables and total yield, with the EPFB surpassing the TRC in terms of rice production characteristics. TRC produced slightly more (4412.32 kg Fadden -1, 2.5%) than EPFB (4295.58 kg Fadden -1). The EPFB system demonstrated a cumulative improvement in apparent FCR values (1.15) when compared to the apparent average FCR (1.80) of the polyculture system (catfish and tilapia). In terms of nutrient utilization efficiency (N-content and retention), the EPFB exceeded the TRC with values of 41.49%, 61.16%, 32.39%, and 28.01%, respectively, in root N-content and retention, kernel N-retention, and total N-retention. TRC achieved higher P-contents and Pretentions contents (%) in all rice parts than the EPFB system. EPFB had a total N-retention gain of 70.22% (15.83% in Nile tilapia, 12.15% in catfish, and 42.23% in rice), and a total P-retention gain of 30.68% (7.48% in Nile tilapia, 7.38% in catfish, and 15.82% in rice). FBPS's net income, on the other hand, was 5.45 times that of TCR. In conclusion, fish culture coupled with rice has a low environmental impact since it avoids contaminated streams and recycles wastewater ponds after biological treatment with rice. By producing rice without the use of agrochemical fertilizers, the present unique EPFB idea as an integrated system model can positively boost biomass production, improve WUE, NUE, and PUE, and decrease climate impact.
C1 [Goda, Ashraf M. A. -S.; Aboseif, Ahmed M.; Mohammedy, Eman Y.; Taha, Mostafa K. S.; Mansour, Ahmed I. A.; Ramadan, Enas A.; Aboushabana, Nevine M.; Zaher, Marwa M.; Ashour, Mohamed] Natl Inst Oceanog & Fisheries NIOF, Cairo 11516, Egypt.
   [Otazus, Nora Ibanes] INKOA SISTEMAS SL, Ribera Axpe 11,Edificio D1,Dept 208, Erandio 48950, Spain.
C3 Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); National Institute of Oceanography &
   Fisheries (NIOF)
RP Ashour, M (corresponding author), Natl Inst Oceanog & Fisheries NIOF, Cairo 11516, Egypt.
EM microalgae_egypt@yahoo.com
RI Ashour, Mohamed/JCP-4317-2023; Goda, Ashraf/AGI-9544-2022; Aboushabana,
   Nevine/P-4067-2014
OI Goda, Ashraf/0000-0002-0980-887X; Ashour, Mohamed/0000-0002-1595-1197;
   Aboushabana, Nevine/0000-0002-4023-1052
FU PRIMA programme - European Union [1915]
FX The experiments presented in this manuscript were subjected to the
   general protocol standards for the Institutional Animal Care and Use
   Committee of the National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries. The
   current experiment was conducted at the El-Kanater El-khayria fish
   station, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF) ,
   Kalubiya, Governorate, Egypt as part of the research project work plan
   "HortiMED Project funded by the PRIMA programme supported by the
   European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, grant
   number 1915 (HortiMED Project) . The contents of this publication are
   the sole responsibility of the authors and the PRIMA Foundation is not
   responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.
CR Ahmed N, 2022, AMBIO, V51, P1933, DOI 10.1007/s13280-022-01711-5
   Ahmed N, 2011, FOOD SECUR, V3, P81, DOI 10.1007/s12571-011-0113-8
   Allison E.H, 2007, Enhancing the Resilience of Inland Fisheries and Aquaculture Systems to Climate Change
   Allison EH, 2009, FISH TRADE DEV, P73
   APHA, 1998, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, method 3030, V20
   Bakr S.A., 2023, J. Pharm. Negat. Results, V14, P1315
   Bello U, 2020, Comparative Study of Two Varieties of Rice (Faro 44 and Faro 60) on Growth Performance of African Catfish (clarias gariepinus) in Fish Cum Rice Integrated System
   Berg H, 2012, J SUSTAIN AGR, V36, P859, DOI 10.1080/10440046.2012.712090
   Bhatta S, 2023, Production Technology of Underutilized Vegetable Crops, P355
   Bin Rahman ANMR, 2023, FOOD ENERGY SECUR, V12, DOI 10.1002/fes3.390
   Boamah PO, 2023, INT J BIOL MACROMOL, V235, DOI 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123858
   CAPMAS, 2022, Central Agency for Public Mobilization & Statistics Annual Bulletin of Statistical Crop Area and Plant Production, 2019/ 2020.
   Cradock-Henry NA, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V107, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.020
   Dong HY, 2012, J ENVIRON SCI, V24, P596, DOI 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60804-8
   Dongmei Y., 2014, J. Anhui Agric. Sci., V42, P6659
   Feng JF, 2016, ECOL ENG, V94, P315, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.002
   Fimbres-Acedo YE, 2020, AQUAC RES, V51, P4340, DOI 10.1111/are.14779
   Frei M, 2005, AQUACULTURE, V244, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.11.014
   GAFRD,, 2020, General Authority for Fish Resources Development. Statistical Analysis of Total Aquaculture Production in Egypt
   Goda AMAS, 2015, TURK J FISH AQUAT SC, V15, P525, DOI 10.4194/1303-2712-v15_2_40
   Gominho-Rosa MD, 2015, AQUACULTURE, V435, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.09.035
   Goodman E.R., 2011, Aquaponics: Community and Economic Development
   Grote U, 2021, FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S, V4, DOI 10.3389/fsufs.2020.617009
   Gupta M, 1997, Integrated AgricultureAquaculture: A Way for Food Security for Small Farmers and Better Resource Management and Environment
   Holliman J.B., 2006, An economic analysis of integrating hydroponic tomato production into an indoor recirculating aquacultural production system
   Hu LL, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep28728
   Li FB, 2019, RICE SCI, V26, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.rsci.2018.12.004
   Miao WM, 2010, SUCCESS STORIES IN ASIAN AQUACULTURE, P15
   Mohanty RK, 2004, AQUACULTURE, V230, P125, DOI 10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00423-X
   Namara RE, 2010, AGR WATER MANAGE, V97, P520, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.05.007
   Nenciu F, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su142013396
   Nguyen QH, 2020, SUSTAIN DEV, V28, P448, DOI 10.1002/sd.2036
   Prasad PVV, 2006, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V139, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.07.003
   Purba S., 1998, EC RICE FISH PRODUCT
   Rasheed M., 2021, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, V1795, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1795/1/012042
   Reddy P.R., 2018, Aquacult.-Plants Invertebrat, V11
   Rodrigues APO, 2012, AQUACULT NUTR, V18, P65, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2095.2011.00877.x
   Rothuis AJ, 1999, AQUACULTURE, V172, P255, DOI 10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00396-2
   Scott D, 1993, P WORLD AQ SOC C TOR
   Seck PA, 2012, FOOD SECUR, V4, P7, DOI 10.1007/s12571-012-0168-1
   Somerville Christopher, 2014, FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper, V589, P1
   Storebakken T, 2000, AQUACULT NUTR, V6, P103
   Tarigan NB, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132212685
   UNESCO, 2015, The United Nations World Water Development Report
   Wallace-Springer N, 2022, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/agronomy12102570
NR 45
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 7
U2 21
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0044-8486
EI 1873-5622
J9 AQUACULTURE
JI Aquaculture
PD JAN 30
PY 2024
VL 579
AR 740215
DI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.740215
EA OCT 2023
PG 12
WC Fisheries; Marine & Freshwater Biology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Fisheries; Marine & Freshwater Biology
GA W7GR1
UT WOS:001093277100001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Nidumolu, UB
   Lubbers, M
   Kanellopoulos, A
   van Ittersum, MK
   Kadiyala, DM
   Sreenivas, G
AF Nidumolu, U. B.
   Lubbers, M.
   Kanellopoulos, A.
   van Ittersum, M. K.
   Kadiyala, D. M.
   Sreenivas, G.
TI Engaging farmers on climate risk through targeted integration of
   bio-economic modelling and seasonal climate forecasts
SO AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Mathematical programming; Probabilistic seasonal forecasts; Crop choice;
   Climate risk; Small holder farmers; Profit maximisation
ID CROP MANAGEMENT; AGRICULTURE; INNOVATIONS; CONSTRAINTS; IMPACT
AB Seasonal climate forecasts (SCFs) can be used to identify appropriate risk management strategies and to reduce the sensitivity of rural industries and communities to climate risk. However, these forecasts have low utility among farmers in agricultural decision making, unless translated into a more understood portfolio of farm management options. Towards achieving this translation, we developed a mathematical programming model that integrates seasonal climate forecasts to assess 'what-if?' crop choice scenarios for famers. We used the Rayapalli village in southern India as a case study. The model maximises expected profitability at village level subject to available resource constraints. The main outputs of the model are the optimal cropping patterns and corresponding agricultural management decisions such as fertiliser, biocide, labour and machinery use. The model is set up to run in two steps. In the first step the initial climate forecast is used to calculate the optimal farm plan and corresponding agricultural management decisions at a village scale. The second step uses a 'revised forecast' that is given six weeks later during the growing season. In scenarios where the forecast provides no clear expectation for a dry or wet season the model utilises the total agricultural land available. A significant area is allocated to redgram (pigeon pea) and the rest to maize and paddy rice. In a forecast where a dry season is more probable, cotton is the predominant crop selected. In scenarios where a 'normal' season is expected, the model chooses predominantly cotton and maize in addition to paddy rice and redgram. As part of the stakeholder engagement process, we operated the model in an iterative way with participating farmers. For 'deficient' rainfall season, farmers were in agreement with the model choice of leaving a large portion of the agriculture land as fallow with only 40 ha (total area 136 ha) of cotton and subsistence paddy rice area While the model crop choice was redgram in 'above normal and wet seasons, only a few farmers in the village favoured redgram mainly because of high labour requirements, and the farmers perceptions about risks related to pests and diseases. This highlighted the discrepancy between the optimal cropping pattern, calculated with the model and the farmer's actual decisions which provided useful insights into factors affecting farmer decision making that are not always captured by models. We found that planning for a 'normal' season alone is likely to result in losses and opportunity costs and an adaptive climate risk management approach is prudent. In an interactive feedback workshop, majority of participating farmers agreed that their knowledge on the utility and challenges of SCF have highly improved through the participation in this research and most agreed that exposure to the model improved their understanding of the role of SCF in crop choice decisions and that the modelling tool was useful to discuss climate risk in agriculture. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Nidumolu, U. B.] CSIRO Agr & Food, Adelaide Labs, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
   [Lubbers, M.; van Ittersum, M. K.] Wageningen Univ, Plant Prod Syst Grp, NL-6700 AP Wageningen, Netherlands.
   [Kanellopoulos, A.] Wageningen Univ, Operat Res & Logist Grp, NL-6700 AP Wageningen, Netherlands.
   [Kadiyala, D. M.] Int Ctr Res Semiarid Trop ICRISAT, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
   [Sreenivas, G.] PJSTS Agr Univ, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
C3 Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO);
   Wageningen University & Research; Wageningen University & Research;
   CGIAR; International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid-Tropics
   (ICRISAT)
RP Nidumolu, UB (corresponding author), CSIRO Agr & Food, Adelaide Labs, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
EM uday.nidumolu@csiro.au
RI Kanellopoulos, Antonis/I-5437-2015; Nidumolu, Uday/D-3771-2011;
   Kadiyala, M/M-6592-2017; van Ittersum, Martin/J-8024-2014
OI Nidumolu, Uday/0009-0000-6844-5434; van Ittersum,
   Martin/0000-0001-8611-6781; Kadiyala, Dakshina
   Murthy/0000-0001-5468-5760
FU Australian Aid Agency for International Development (AusAID)/Australian
   Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT); CSIRO
FX The work presented in the paper is part of the Australian Aid Agency for
   International Development (AusAID)/Australian Department of Foreign
   Affairs and Trade (DFAT) and CSIRO funded project "Can seasonal climate
   forecasts improve food security in Indian Ocean Rim countries in a
   variable and changing climate?". We acknowledge AusAID/DFAT and CSIRO.
   Farming communities and in-country partner institutions participated in
   this activity with enthusiasm and contributed to discussions and
   provided valuable feedback on the model. Peter Hayman (South Australian
   Research and Development Institute, Adelaide) provided insights into
   challenges of applying SCF in agricultural decision making and
   discussion around using the term normal in SCF. D.R. Reddy (PJTS
   Agricultural University, Hyderabad), V. Nageswara Rao (ICRISAT,
   Hyderabad), T. Chiranjeevi (Livelihoods and Natural Resources Management
   Institute) provided useful inputs and feedback on the model. David
   Gobbett and Alison Laing from CSIRO provided useful comments to improve
   the manuscript.
CR Anderson D., 2005, SEAONAL CLIMATE FORE, P499
   Ash A, 2007, AUST J AGR RES, V58, P952, DOI 10.1071/AR06188
   Clewett J. F., 1990, 1 INT S INT LAND US
   COLEMAN JS, 1988, AM J SOCIOL, V94, pS95, DOI 10.1086/228943
   Hammer GL, 1996, AUST J AGR RES, V47, P717, DOI 10.1071/AR9960717
   Hansen JW, 2009, AGR SYST, V101, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2009.03.005
   Hansen JW, 2002, AGR SYST, V74, P309, DOI 10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00043-4
   Hardaker J. B., 1991, Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, V59, P9
   Hayman P., 2008, GLOBAL ISSUES PADDOC
   Hayman P. T., 2013, GLOB FOOD SEC C
   Hayman P, 2007, AUST J AGR RES, V58, P975, DOI 10.1071/AR06200
   IMD, 2014, LONG RANG FOR UPD 20
   Janssen S, 2007, AGR SYST, V94, P622, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2007.03.001
   Kokic P, 2007, AUST J AGR RES, V58, P993, DOI 10.1071/AR06193
   Kolb D., 2004, PWER 2 X 2 MATRIX JO
   Marshall NA, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V107, P511, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9962-y
   Meinke H, 2007, AUST J AGR RES, V58, P935, DOI 10.1071/ARv58n10_PR
   Meza FJ, 2008, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V47, P1269, DOI 10.1175/2007JAMC1540.1
   Millner A, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.08.001
   Nelson RA, 2002, AGR SYST, V74, P393, DOI 10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00047-1
   Nidumolu UB, 2011, J AGR SCI, V149, P663, DOI 10.1017/S0021859611000165
   Nidumolu U.B., 2015, J AGR SCI, P1
   Pitel J., 1989, MULTIPLE CRITERIA AN
   Power SB, 2007, AUST J AGR RES, V58, P945, DOI 10.1071/AR06196
   Romero C., 1989, MULTIPLE CRITERIA AN
   Shankar KR, 2011, J AGRIC EDUC EXT, V17, P153, DOI 10.1080/1389224X.2011.544456
   Stephens EM, 2012, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V3, P409, DOI 10.1002/wcc.187
   Stone R.C., 2007, METEOROL APPL, V13, P7
   ten Berge HFM, 2000, EUR J AGRON, V13, P263, DOI 10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00078-2
   van der Wal M, 2014, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V24, P1, DOI 10.1002/eet.1627
   WMO, 2014, WMO STRAT SERV DEL I
   ZADEH LA, 1963, IEEE T AUTOMAT CONTR, VAC 8, P59, DOI 10.1109/TAC.1963.1105511
   Ziervogel G, 2005, AGR SYST, V83, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2004.02.009
   Ziervogel G, 2003, AREA, V35, P403, DOI 10.1111/j.0004-0894.2003.00190.x
NR 34
TC 14
Z9 15
U1 2
U2 37
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0308-521X
EI 1873-2267
J9 AGR SYST
JI Agric. Syst.
PD NOV
PY 2016
VL 149
BP 175
EP 184
DI 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.011
PG 10
WC Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA EA9RW
UT WOS:000386983400017
OA Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Hira, FS
   Asad, A
   Farrah, Z
   Basit, RS
   Mehreen, F
   Muhammad, K
AF Hira, Fatima Syeda
   Asad, Ali
   Farrah, Zaidi
   Basit, Rasheed Syed
   Mehreen, Fatima
   Muhammad, Khisroon
TI Patterns of occurrence of dengue and chikungunya, and spatial
   distribution of mosquito vector <i>Aedes albopictus</i> in Swabi
   district, Pakistan
SO TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH
LA English
DT Article
DE dengue; chikungunya; Aedes albopictus; Swabi; Pakistan; Dengue;
   chikungunya; Aedes albopictus; Swabi; Pakistan
ID DIPTERA-CULICIDAE; AEGYPTI; FEVER; TEMPERATURE; INFECTION; INVASION;
   VIRUS; SKUSE; GLOBALIZATION; URBANIZATION
AB ObjectiveTwo principal vector species, Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus, are known for transmission of dengue (DEN) and chikungunya (CHK) in Pakistan. We aimed to investigate their spatial and temporal distribution.
   Methods and ResultsThe Maximum Entropy algorithm revealed current climatic suitability of A.albopictus by highlighting variables contributing to its spatial distribution: Land use cover was the most important environmental factor (63.1%) followed by elevation-normalised difference vegetation index (10.9%), NDVI (8.5%) and annual precipitation (7.9%). As per Normalized Difference Vegetation Index values, the vector's presence was highly likely in areas with little vegetation such as built-up spaces or uncultivated fields, and in areas with sparse vegetation such as grasslands and cultivated fields. Temperature variables showed differing effects on vector ecology with annual temperature being the most important. Logistic regression models showed that presence of the vector, build-up and distance to roads contributed significantly to the distribution of both DEN and CHIK.
   ConclusionIn Swabi, the mean temperatures of warmest and driest quarters are more important in the spatial distribution of A.albopictus than mean temperatures of the wettest and coldest quarters. Finally, disease modelling reflects a high probability for both DEN and CHIK in the same regions over a huge area.
   ObjectifDeux principales especes de vecteurs, Aedes aegypti et Aedes albopictus, sont connues pour la transmission de la dengue (DEN) et du chikungunya (CHK) au Pakistan. Nous avons cherche a etudier leur distribution spatiale et temporelle.
   Methodes et resultatsL'algorithme d'entropie maximale a revele l'adaptation climatique actuelle d'A. Albopictus en mettant en evidence des variables contribuant a sa repartition spatiale: L'etendue des terres utilisees etait le facteur environnemental le plus important (63.1%), suivi de l'indice de la difference de vegetation normalisee (NDVI) par l'altitude (10.9%), le NDVI (8.5%) et les precipitations annuelles (7.9%). Selon les valeurs NDVI, la presence du vecteur etait tres probable dans les zones avec peu de vegetation telles que les espaces batis ou les champs non cultives et dans les zones a vegetation clairsemee comme les prairies et les champs cultives. Les variables de temperature ont montre des effets differents sur l'ecologie des vecteurs, la temperature annuelle etant la plus importante. Les modeles de regression logistique ont montre que la presence du vecteur, les zones batis et la distance jusqu'aux routes contribuaient de maniere significative a la distribution de la DEN et du CHIK.
   ConclusionA Swabi, les temperatures moyennes des trimestres les plus chauds et les plus secs sont plus importantes dans la repartition spatiale d'A. Albopictus que les temperatures moyennes des trimestres les plus humides et les plus froids. Enfin, la modelisation de la maladie reflete une forte probabilite pour DEN et CHIK dans les memes regions sur une vaste zone.
C1 [Hira, Fatima Syeda; Asad, Ali] Inst Space Technol, Dept Space Sci, POB 2750, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.
   [Farrah, Zaidi; Basit, Rasheed Syed; Muhammad, Khisroon] Univ Peshawar, Dept Zool, Peshawar, Pakistan.
   [Mehreen, Fatima] Rawalpindi Med Coll, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
C3 University of Peshawar; Rawalpindi Medical College; National University
   of Sciences & Technology - Pakistan
RP Hira, FS (corresponding author), Inst Space Technol, Dept Space Sci, POB 2750, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.
EM fatima.bu14@gmail.com
RI Asad, Ali/Q-9193-2017
OI Fatima, Syeda Hira/0000-0002-7180-4722
CR Afzal M, 2015, MERIT RES J MED MEDI, V3, P69
   Alto BW, 2001, J MED ENTOMOL, V38, P646, DOI 10.1603/0022-2585-38.5.646
   [Anonymous], PAK J ZOOL
   [Anonymous], PACKAGE GSIF
   [Anonymous], 2008, HOLE FILLED SRTM GLO
   [Anonymous], INT J INNOV APPL STU
   [Anonymous], PUTA J SCI
   [Anonymous], THESIS
   Araujo RV, 2015, BRAZ J INFECT DIS, V19, P146
   Braks MAH, 2004, ANN ENTOMOL SOC AM, V97, P130, DOI 10.1603/0013-8746(2004)097[0130:ICBTIS]2.0.CO;2
   Braunisch V, 2013, ECOGRAPHY, V36, P971, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00138.x
   Britch SC, 2008, J AM MOSQUITO CONTR, V24, P115, DOI 10.2987/5594.1
   Campbell LP, 2015, PHILOS T R SOC B, V370, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2014.0135
   Chan AST, 1998, ANN TROP MED PARASIT, V92, P317, DOI 10.1080/00034989859898
   Christensen O.F., 2002, R NEWS, V2, P26
   Dash Paban Kumar, 2005, Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, V36, P370
   Delatte H, 2008, PARASITE, V15, P3, DOI 10.1051/parasite/2008151003
   Delatte H, 2009, J MED ENTOMOL, V46, P33, DOI 10.1603/033.046.0105
   Delatte H, 2010, VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOT, V10, P249, DOI 10.1089/vbz.2009.0026
   Diggle P. J., 2003, SPATIAL STAT COMPUTA, P43, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-21811-3_2
   Diggle PJ, 2007, SPRINGER SER STAT, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-48536-2
   Ditsuwan T, 2011, ANN EPIDEMIOL, V21, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.12.002
   Elith J, 2006, ECOGRAPHY, V29, P129, DOI 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
   Fatima SH, 2016, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V21, P427, DOI 10.1111/tmi.12664
   Gratz NG, 2004, MED VET ENTOMOL, V18, P215, DOI 10.1111/j.0269-283X.2004.00513.x
   Gubler Duane J, 2011, Trop Med Health, V39, P3, DOI 10.2149/tmh.2011-S05
   Gupta E, 2006, VIROL J, V3, DOI 10.1186/1743-422X-3-92
   Hijmans RJ, 2005, INT J CLIMATOL, V25, P1965, DOI 10.1002/joc.1276
   HO BC, 1971, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V44, P635
   HUSSAIN F, 1993, PAKISTAN J BOT, V25, P51
   Isaak E.H., 1989, INTRO APPL GEOSTATIS
   Khan E, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0012505
   Kilpatrick AM, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P323, DOI 10.1126/science.1201010
   Koch LK, 2016, PARASITOL RES, V115, P957, DOI 10.1007/s00436-015-4822-3
   Kraemer MUG, 2015, ELIFE, V4, DOI 10.7554/eLife.08347
   Kumar C Jairaj, 2007, Open Med, V1, pe150
   Lambrechts L, 2010, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000646
   Li YJ, 2014, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003301
   Mao L, 2016, ACTA TROP, V162, P188, DOI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.06.029
   Medley KA, 2010, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V19, P122, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00497.x
   Miller J, 2007, ECOL MODEL, V202, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.012
   Muhammad Qasim Muhammad Qasim, 2016, Journal of Rural Development and Agriculture, V1, P49
   Mulligan K, 2015, PATHOG GLOB HEALTH, V109, P10, DOI 10.1179/2047773214Y.0000000168
   Njenga MK, 2008, J GEN VIROL, V89, P2754, DOI 10.1099/vir.0.2008/005413-0
   Paupy C, 2010, VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOT, V10, P259, DOI 10.1089/vbz.2009.0005
   Phillips SJ, 2006, ECOL MODEL, V190, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
   Pialoux G, 2007, LANCET INFECT DIS, V7, P319, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70107-X
   QUTUBUDDIN M., 1960, MOSQUITO NEWS, V20, P355
   R Core Team, 2013, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
   Raheel U, 2011, J INFECT DEV COUNTR, V5, P239, DOI 10.3855/jidc.1017
   RAO C V R M, 1987, Indian Journal of Pediatrics, V54, P11, DOI 10.1007/BF02751227
   Rasheed SB, 2013, PUBLIC HEALTH, V127, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.09.006
   Rauf M, 2017, LANCET INFECT DIS, V17, P258, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30074-9
   REISEN W K, 1978, Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, V9, P587
   Rezza G, 2007, LANCET, V370, P1840, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61779-6
   Rochlin I, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0060874
   Roiz D, 2010, VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOT, V10, P811, DOI 10.1089/vbz.2009.0098
   Sher Z, 2012, PAK J BOT, V44, P711
   Skuse FAA., 1894, INDIAN MUSEUM NOTES, V3, P20
   Suleman M, 1996, J MED ENTOMOL, V33, P689, DOI 10.1093/jmedent/33.4.689
   Suleman Mohammad, 1993, Pakistan Journal of Zoology, V25, P321
   TABACHNICK WJ, 1985, AM J TROP MED HYG, V34, P1219, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.1985.34.1219
   Tatem AJ, 2017, SCI DATA, V4, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2017.4
   Turell MJ, 2001, J MED ENTOMOL, V38, P130, DOI 10.1603/0022-2585-38.2.130
   Vanwambeke Sophie O, 2006, Int J Health Geogr, V5, P5, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-5-5
   Vanwambeke SO, 2007, J MED ENTOMOL, V44, P133, DOI 10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44[133:LALCFI]2.0.CO;2
   Vazeille M, 2010, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000706
   Weaver SC, 2013, TRENDS MICROBIOL, V21, P360, DOI 10.1016/j.tim.2013.03.003
   Westbrook CJ, 2010, VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOT, V10, P241, DOI 10.1089/vbz.2009.0035
   Yaqub T, 2017, ACTA TROP, V176, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.07.019
NR 70
TC 15
Z9 16
U1 0
U2 16
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1360-2276
EI 1365-3156
J9 TROP MED INT HEALTH
JI Trop. Med. Int. Health
PD SEP
PY 2018
VL 23
IS 9
BP 1002
EP 1013
DI 10.1111/tmi.13125
PG 12
WC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Tropical Medicine
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Tropical Medicine
GA GS4EW
UT WOS:000443590900008
PM 29956428
OA Bronze
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU van Aalst, MA
   Koomen, E
   Tran, DD
   Hoang, HM
   Nguyen, HQ
   de Groot, HLF
AF van Aalst, M. A.
   Koomen, E.
   Tran, D. D.
   Hoang, H. M.
   Nguyen, H. Q.
   de Groot, H. L. F.
TI The economic sustainability of rice farming and its influence on farmer
   decision-making in the upper Mekong delta, Vietnam
SO AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Land and water management; Rice farmer income; Farmer behaviour; Climate
   adaptation; Vietnam Mekong delta; Inequality
ID RED-RIVER DELTAS; GREEN-REVOLUTION; GIANG PROVINCE; AGRICULTURE;
   MANAGEMENT; CHALLENGES; DYNAMICS; IMPACTS; CLIMATE; SYSTEMS
AB Intensive agriculture is increasingly associated with environmental degradation that may jeopardise long-term environmental and economic sustainability. The high-dike system in the upper Mekong delta that has enabled intensive rice cultivation represents a prime example of these potential negative feedbacks. The lack of seasonal flooding and the associated depletion of nutrients is expected to affect farmer income as productivity declines and more fertiliser is required. Therefore, emphasis has shifted towards more sustainable, flood-based agricul-ture, however farmer uptake has its challenges. Based on a compilation of different household surveys we first analyse rice farmers' ability and willingness to transition and subsequently study the economic sustainability of intensive rice-based livelihoods. A Motivation and Ability (MOTA) survey reveals that two-thirds of the surveyed rice farmers are reluctant to change to flood-based farming systems, as they consider rice cultivation to be economically viable in the near future. They also mention financial and technical ability as key constraints. Subsequently, we analyse yield and fertiliser developments for a large sample of farming households under different dike systems between 2008 and 2015. This shows that income from rice farming grew steadily under high-dike systems as productivity growth compensated for higher input requirements. This growth is partly dampened by the slightly higher negative impacts of potential flood damage in high-dike areas, compared low-dike areas. A counterintuitive effect that is related to the fact that high dikes remain prone to dike overtopping or breaching in the flooding season, resulting in potentially higher damage than low-dike areas that are able to crop flood-based alternatives. The observed growth in income is a likely explanation for the reluctance to change in the studied period. Our analysis also shows that rice income growth is unequally distributed in high-dike areas, with lower incomes being associated with new high-dike systems and slower growth of incomes of smallholder rice farmers compared to large-scale farms. This makes smallholder rice farmers in high-dike areas especially vulnerable to changing conditions, and thus a priority target group for policy makers promoting flood-based alternatives. Recent commune level yield data show that the past productivity growth has stalled, increasing the prospects for alternative flood-based agriculture. This transition can be facilitated, by enhancing the eco-nomic viability of flood-based crops and, particularly for smallholder farmers, by improving their financial and technical capabilities through supportive policies.
C1 [van Aalst, M. A.; Koomen, E.; de Groot, H. L. F.] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Spatial Econ, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
   [van Aalst, M. A.] Deltares, POB 177, NL-2600 MH Delft, Netherlands.
   [Tran, D. D.; Nguyen, H. Q.] Vietnam Natl Univ Ho Chi Minh City VNU HCM, Inst Environm & Resources, Ctr Water Management & Climate Change, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
   [Tran, D. D.] Nanyang Technol Univ, Natl Inst Educ, Earth Observ Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
   [Tran, D. D.] Nanyang Technol Univ, Asian Sch Environm, Singapore, Singapore.
   [Hoang, H. M.] Can Tho Univ, Res Inst Climate Change, Can Tho, Vietnam.
   [Nguyen, H. Q.] Vietnam Natl Univ, Inst Circular Econ Dev, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
C3 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Deltares; Vietnam National University Ho
   Chi Minh City (VNUHCM) System; Nanyang Technological University;
   National Institute of Education (NIE) Singapore; Nanyang Technological
   University; Can Tho University; Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh
   City (VNUHCM) System
RP van Aalst, MA (corresponding author), Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Spatial Econ, Amsterdam, Netherlands.; Tran, DD (corresponding author), Vietnam Natl Univ Ho Chi Minh City VNU HCM, Inst Environm & Resources, Ctr Water Management & Climate Change, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
EM maaike.vanaalst@deltares.nl; dungtranducvn@yahoo.com
RI de Groot, Henri/E-8493-2011; Duc Tran, Dung/J-2496-2015
OI Koomen, Eric/0000-0002-0676-1252; Duc Tran, Dung/0000-0003-2331-4996
FU NWO Top Sector Water Call: Adaptation Pathways for socially inclusive
   development of urbanising deltas [OND1362814]; Vietnam National
   University Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM) [B2021-24-04]
FX This research was funded by the NWO Top Sector Water Call: Adaptation
   Pathways for socially inclusive development of urbanising deltas
   (research number OND1362814). Data used in this research were partly
   supported by the project funded by Vietnam National University Ho Chi
   Minh City (VNU-HCM) under grant number B2021-24-04.
CR Ba HA, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104050
   Berg H, 2017, SUSTAIN SCI, V12, P137, DOI 10.1007/s11625-016-0409-x
   Binh NT, 2022, AGR WATER MANAGE, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107739
   Chapman A, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V559, P326, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.162
   Chapman AD, 2016, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V137, P593, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1684-3
   Dang NA, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132413549
   Dawe D, 2000, FIELD CROP RES, V66, P175, DOI 10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00075-7
   Dogliotti S, 2014, AGR SYST, V126, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.02.003
   Tran DD, 2021, AGR WATER MANAGE, V243, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106495
   Tran DD, 2019, AGR WATER MANAGE, V223, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105703
   Tran DD, 2018, AGR WATER MANAGE, V206, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.039
   Tran DD, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V217, P429, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.116
   Fan SG, 2005, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V32, P135, DOI 10.1111/j.0169-5150.2004.00019.x
   GoV, 2017, PRIME MINSTER RESOLU
   Hartigan J. A., 1979, Applied Statistics, V28, P100, DOI 10.2307/2346830
   Hazell P. B. R., 2009, Millions fed: proven successes in agricultural development, P25
   Hoa LTV, 2007, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V71, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2006.08.021
   Hoang LP, 2016, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V20, P3027, DOI 10.5194/hess-20-3027-2016
   Nguyen HQ, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V62, P1603, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2019.1568768
   Howie C., 2011, 25 INT COMM IRR DRAI
   Huan NH, 2008, INT J PEST MANAGE, V54, P339, DOI 10.1080/09670870802403978
   Hui T. R., 2022, Environmental Challenges, V7, DOI [10.1016/j.envc.2022.100454, DOI 10.1016/J.ENVC.2022.100454]
   Huu P.C., 2011, PLANNING IMPLEMENTAT
   IUCN VAWR, 2016, VIETN MEK DELT INT C
   Käkönen M, 2008, AMBIO, V37, P205, DOI 10.1579/0044-7447(2008)37[205:MDATCM]2.0.CO;2
   Keating BA, 2010, CROP SCI, V50, pS109, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2009.10.0594
   Kien N.V., 2014, An Economic Evaluation Of Flood Dike Construction
   Kuenzer C, 2012, ENVIRON SCI ENG, P7, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-3962-8_2
   Lan Ngo Thi Phuong, 2021, [Journal of People, Plants, and Environment, 인간식물환경학회지], V24, P551
   Ngan LT, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V73, P269, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.030
   Manh NV, 2014, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V18, P3033, DOI 10.5194/hess-18-3033-2014
   McKenzie FC, 2015, FOOD SECUR, V7, P221, DOI 10.1007/s12571-015-0441-1
   Minh L.N., 2012, GROWING BETTER FUTUR
   Nguyen MT, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V92, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.016
   Hung NN, 2014, HYDROL PROCESS, V28, P3145, DOI 10.1002/hyp.9855
   Nguyen NgocAnh., 2017, Vietnam Journal of Science, Technology and Engineering, V59, P93, DOI [10.31276/VJSTE.59(1).93, DOI 10.31276/VJSTE.59(1).93]
   Triet NVK, 2018, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V18, P2859, DOI 10.5194/nhess-18-2859-2018
   Triet NVK, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P3991, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-3991-2017
   Dung NV, 2015, J HYDROL, V527, P704, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.033
   Phi HL, 2015, WATER INT, V40, P984, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2015.1101528
   Pingali PL, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P12302, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0912953109
   Renaud FG, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P644, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.007
   Renaud FG, 2012, ENVIRON SCI ENG, P445, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-3962-8_17
   Sakamoto T, 2009, JARQ-JPN AGR RES Q, V43, P173, DOI 10.6090/jarq.43.173
   Sakamoto T, 2009, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V92, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.02.002
   Smajgl A, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P167, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2469, 10.1038/nclimate2469]
   Stuart AM, 2018, FIELD CROP RES, V229, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.10.001
   Syvitski JPM, 2007, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V57, P261, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.12.001
   Luu T, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V810, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152207
   Tran TA, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104157
   Tilman D, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P281, DOI 10.1126/science.1057544
   Tong Y.D., 2019, J ASIA PAC ECON, P1
   Tran DD, 2018, IRRIG DRAIN, V67, P81, DOI 10.1002/ird.2172
   Trung N.H., 2012, VNU J SCI EARTH ENV, V28
   Tuan L., 2007, FLOOD SALINITY MANAG
   Ut TT, 2006, DEV ECON, V44, P167, DOI 10.1111/j.1746-1049.2006.00012.x
   Van Nha D., 2006, RES IMPACTS DYKE SOC
   van Staveren MF, 2018, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V20, P267, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2017.1348287
   Tong YD, 2017, ECOL ECON, V132, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.013
   Yuen KW, 2021, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V21, P1473, DOI 10.5194/nhess-21-1473-2021
   Zhao SQ, 2006, ECOL RES, V21, P890, DOI 10.1007/s11284-006-0048-2
NR 61
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 2
U2 18
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0378-3774
EI 1873-2283
J9 AGR WATER MANAGE
JI Agric. Water Manage.
PD FEB 1
PY 2023
VL 276
AR 108018
DI 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108018
EA DEC 2022
PG 13
WC Agronomy; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture; Water Resources
GA 7B5ZK
UT WOS:000899210700007
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Bregaglio, S
   Willocquet, L
   Kersebaum, KC
   Ferrise, R
   Stella, T
   Ferreira, TB
   Pavan, W
   Asseng, S
   Savary, S
AF Bregaglio, Simone
   Willocquet, Laetitia
   Kersebaum, Kurt Christian
   Ferrise, Roberto
   Stella, Tommaso
   Ferreira, Thiago Berton
   Pavan, Willingthon
   Asseng, Senthold
   Savary, Serge
TI Comparing process-based wheat growth models in their simulation of yield
   losses caused by plant diseases
SO FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Plant diseases; Light stealers; Assimilate sappers; Comparison of
   models; Ecological intensification
ID RUST UREDOSPORE PRODUCTION; WINTER-WHEAT; LEAF RUST; PUCCINIA-RECONDITA;
   MULTIPLE-PEST; CROP LOSSES; ECOLOGICAL INTENSIFICATION; DYNAMIC
   SIMULATION; NITROGEN DYNAMICS; POWDERY MILDEW
AB Plant diseases are major causes of crop yield losses globally, yet their effects represent a poorly documented source of uncertainty in crop modelling. Ignoring the effects of plant diseases in crop models may lead to large overestimations of current and future crop production levels. Simulation modelling must be seen as a necessary instrument to understand systems and predict their behaviours. This instrument is therefore necessary when profound changes in system structures are envisioned in view of, e.g., ecological intensification or climate adaptation, which necessarily will change injury profiles by plant pathogens and pests. Here, damage mechanisms associated with four major diseases of wheat (brown and yellow rust, septoria tritici blotch and powdery mildew) are considered. These diseases and their damage mechanisms are featured in WHEATPEST, a process-based model for wheat growth under disease. The same damage mechanisms were thus incorporated into four wheat growth models (HERMES, WOFOST_GT, SSM_WHEAT, DSSAT-Nwheat), which did not account for yield losses to diseases before. A benchmark experimental data set from the Netherlands was used to perform two calibration steps to simulate disease-free attainable wheat yields (Ya), first by using the experimentally measured crop development and yields as reference, and second by further using the observed leaf area dynamics. A simulation experiment was then conducted with the five models, with three independent factors: (i) each of the four wheat diseases (individually or combined), (ii) the shape of disease progress curves, and (iii) the maximum disease severity. We analysed the simulated crop growth, actual crop yield (Y), and absolute (YL = Ya - Y) and relative (RYL = YL/Ya) yield loss, at different levels of these three factors. In a last stage of analysis, we simulated the effects of Ya on YL and RYL. Maximum severity of disease had the strongest effect on simulated Y and on YL, while there were also significant differences among models in the simulated YL. Powdery mildew and brown rust were generally associated with higher and lower YL, respectively. Simulated RYL increased as the Ya was decreased. Increase of RYL at lower Ya was attributed to a larger reduction of intercepted radiation at low green leaf area index. This work outlines the rationale for implementing damage mechanisms associated with plant diseases into crop models, and provides the necessary first step towards scenario analyses where the consequences of technology shifts, climate change, and changes in disease patterns may influence the magnitude of yield losses to plant diseases.
C1 [Bregaglio, Simone] CREA Council Agr Res & Econ, Res Ctr Agr & Environm, Via Corticella 133, Bologna, Italy.
   [Willocquet, Laetitia; Savary, Serge] Univ Toulouse, INPT, INP EI Purpan, AGIR,INRAE, Castanet Tolosan, France.
   [Kersebaum, Kurt Christian; Stella, Tommaso] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Muncheberg, Germany.
   [Ferrise, Roberto] Univ Florence, Dept Agr Food Environm & Forestry, Florence, Italy.
   [Ferreira, Thiago Berton; Pavan, Willingthon] Univ Passo Fundo, Grad Program Appl Comp, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
   [Asseng, Senthold] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Life Sci Engn, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany.
   [Kersebaum, Kurt Christian] Czech Acad Sci, Global Change Res Inst, Brno, Czech Republic.
   [Pavan, Willingthon] Int Fertilizer Dev Ctr, Muscle Shoals, AL USA.
   [Asseng, Senthold] Univ Florida, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.
C3 Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e L'analisi Dell'economia
   Agraria (CREA); Universite Federale Toulouse Midi-Pyrenees (ComUE);
   Universite de Toulouse; Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse;
   INRAE; Leibniz Association; Leibniz Zentrum fur
   Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF); University of Florence; Universidade
   de Passo Fundo; Technical University of Munich; Czech Academy of
   Sciences; Global Change Research Centre of the Czech Academy of
   Sciences; State University System of Florida; University of Florida
RP Bregaglio, S (corresponding author), CREA Council Agr Res & Econ, Res Ctr Agr & Environm, Via Corticella 133, Bologna, Italy.
EM simoneugomaria.bregaglio@crea.gov.it
RI ; Kersebaum, Kurt Christian/A-7558-2010; Asseng, Senthold/Y-6014-2019
OI BREGAGLIO, SIMONE/0000-0001-8381-2626; Pavan,
   Willingthon/0000-0001-7906-6624; Kersebaum, Kurt
   Christian/0000-0002-3679-8427; Asseng, Senthold/0000-0002-7583-3811
FU AgriDigit-Agromodelli project - Italian Ministry of Agricultural, Food
   and Forestry Policies and Tourism [36502]; Educ.Net Project - INRAE
   Meta-programme on Climate Change, ACCAF (Adaptation of Agriculture and
   Forest to Climate Change); German Ministry of Education and Research
   through MACSUR [031B0039C]; Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of
   Czech Republic [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000797]
FX This work was developed within PeDiMIP, the Pest and Disease Modeling
   Intercomparison Project of the Agricultural Modelling, Intercomparison
   and improvement Project (AgMIP), and within MACSUR. This work received
   support by the AgriDigit-Agromodelli project (DM no. 36502 of
   20/12/2018), funded by the Italian Ministry of Agricultural, Food and
   Forestry Policies and Tourism. This work was also supported by the
   Educ.Net Project funded by the INRAE Metaprogramme on Climate Change,
   ACCAF (Adaptation of Agriculture and Forest to Climate Change). KCK got
   support from German Ministry of Education and Research through MACSUR
   (031B0039C) and the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of Czech
   Republic through SustES Adaptation strategies for sustainable ecosystem
   services and food security under adverse environmental conditions
   (project no. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000797).
CR Aggarwal PK, 2006, AGR SYST, V89, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2005.08.001
   [Anonymous], 2014, CHIL J AGR RES
   [Anonymous], 2007, STUDY PLANT DIS EPID
   [Anonymous], 1986, MODELLING AGR PRODUC
   Antle JM, 2017, AGR SYST, V155, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.10.002
   Ash G.J., 1990, NO NEW S WALES
   Ashmawy M.A., 2014, J PHYTOPATHOL, V42, P71
   Asseng S, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P827, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1916, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1916]
   BASTIAANS L, 1991, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V81, P611, DOI 10.1094/Phyto-81-611
   Bhathal JS, 2003, EUR J PLANT PATHOL, V109, P435, DOI 10.1023/A:1024277420773
   BOOTE KJ, 1983, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V73, P1581, DOI 10.1094/Phyto-73-1581
   Bregaglio S, 2016, EUR J AGRON, V76, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2016.02.009
   Bregaglio S, 2015, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V72, P426, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.05.011
   BREMAN H, 1983, SCIENCE, V221, P1341, DOI 10.1126/science.221.4618.1341
   Burleigh J.R., 1973, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V62, P944
   CABI, 2018, Crop Protection Compendium
   Cassman KG, 1999, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V96, P5952, DOI 10.1073/pnas.96.11.5952
   Chakraborty S, 2011, PLANT PATHOL, V60, P2, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02411.x
   Chambers J.M., 1991, Statistical Models in S, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-50096-1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-50096-1]
   Chen XM, 2005, CAN J PLANT PATHOL, V27, P314
   Chiarappa L., 1971, FAO MANUAL EVALUATIO
   DAAMEN RA, 1989, J PHYTOPATHOL, V125, P305, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1989.tb01075.x
   DAAMEN RA, 1991, NETH J PLANT PATHOL, V97, P275, DOI 10.1007/BF01974223
   de Vallavieille-Pope C, 2000, AGRONOMIE, V20, P715, DOI 10.1051/agro:2000171
   DEWILLIGEN P, 1991, FERT RES, V27, P141, DOI 10.1007/BF01051122
   Donatelli M, 2017, AGR SYST, V155, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.019
   Duveiller E, 2005, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V95, P248, DOI 10.1094/PHYTO-95-0248
   Esker P. D., 2012, CAB Reviews, V7, P1, DOI 10.1079/PAVSNNR20127052
   Ewert F, 2015, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V72, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.003
   Figueroa M, 2018, MOL PLANT PATHOL, V19, P1523, DOI 10.1111/mpp.12618
   Fremier AK, 2013, BIOSCIENCE, V63, P472, DOI 10.1525/bio.2013.63.6.9
   GRIFFEY CA, 1993, PLANT DIS, V77, P618, DOI 10.1094/PD-77-0618
   Groot J.J.R, 1987, 13 CABOTT
   He DC, 2016, J INTEGR AGR, V15, P705, DOI 10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61300-4
   JOHNSON KB, 1992, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V82, P363, DOI 10.1094/Phyto-82-363
   JOHNSON KB, 1987, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V77, P1495
   Jones JW, 2017, AGR SYST, V155, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.05.014
   Kassie BT, 2016, EUR J AGRON, V81, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2016.08.012
   KERSEBAUM KC, 1991, FERT RES, V27, P273, DOI 10.1007/BF01051133
   Kersebaum KC, 2007, NUTR CYCL AGROECOSYS, V77, P39, DOI 10.1007/s10705-006-9044-8
   LANCASHIRE PD, 1991, ANN APPL BIOL, V119, P561, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1991.tb04895.x
   Le S, 2008, J STAT SOFTW, V25, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v025.i01
   LEATH S, 1989, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V79, P152, DOI 10.1094/Phyto-79-152
   LEITCH MH, 1995, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V124, P361, DOI 10.1017/S0021859600073329
   Luo Y, 1997, AGR SYST, V53, P27, DOI 10.1016/S0308-521X(96)00038-8
   Mendelsohn R, 2011, HDB CLIMATE CHANGE A, V13942
   Oerke EC, 2006, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V144, P31, DOI 10.1017/S0021859605005708
   Penning de Vries F.W.T., 1982, Simulation of Plant Growth and Crop Production
   Pierre B, 2015, FIELD CROP RES, V180, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.05.006
   PINNSCHMIDT HO, 1995, AGR SYST, V48, P193, DOI 10.1016/0308-521X(94)00012-G
   Pretty J, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P441, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0114-0
   RABBINGE R, 1980, Z PFLANZENK PFLANZEN, V87, P409
   Rabbinge R., 1981, Effects of Disease On the Physiology of the Growing Plant, V11, P201
   Rabbinge R., 1989, Simulation and systems management in crop protection, P3
   RAO KVS, 1989, J PHYTOPATHOL, V127, P200, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1989.tb01130.x
   Robert C, 2004, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V94, P712, DOI 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.7.712
   Robert C, 2002, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V92, P762, DOI 10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.7.762
   Röll G, 2019, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/agronomy9030120
   ROSSING WAH, 1991, NETH J PLANT PATHOL, V97, P25, DOI 10.1007/BF01995782
   Savary S, 2017, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V107, P1109, DOI [10.1094/PHYTO-01-17-0027-F1, 10.1094/PHYTO-01-17-0027-FI]
   Savary S, 2017, PLANT PATHOL, V66, P867, DOI 10.1111/ppa.12659
   SAVARY S, 1990, AGR SYST, V32, P113, DOI 10.1016/0308-521X(90)90034-N
   Savary S., 2014, Plant Heal. Instr., DOI [10.1094/phi-a-2014-0314-01, DOI 10.1094/PHI-A-2014-0314-01]
   Savary S, 2006, ANNU REV PHYTOPATHOL, V44, P89, DOI 10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143342
   Savary S, 2020, ANNU REV PHYTOPATHOL, V58, P313, DOI 10.1146/annurev-phyto-010820-012856
   Savary S, 2019, NAT ECOL EVOL, V3, P430, DOI 10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y
   Savary S, 2018, EUR J AGRON, V100, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.eja.2018.04.003
   SECK M, 1988, CROP PROT, V7, P39, DOI 10.1016/0261-2194(88)90036-1
   Shahin A.A., 2020, Am. J. Life Sci., V8, P127, DOI [10.11648/j.ajls.20200805.17, DOI 10.11648/J.AJLS.20200805.17]
   Singh RP, 2016, ANNU REV PHYTOPATHOL, V54, P303, DOI 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080615-095835
   Soltani A, 2013, INT J PLANT PROD, V7, P711
   Stella T, 2014, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V59, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.007
   Strange RN, 2005, ANNU REV PHYTOPATHOL, V43, P83, DOI 10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.113004.133839
   Sukumar Chakraborty Sukumar Chakraborty, 2008, CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, V3, P1, DOI 10.1079/PAVSNNR20083054
   TENG P S, 1977, Agricultural Systems, V2, P189, DOI 10.1016/0308-521X(77)90004-X
   Teng P.S., 1987, Crop loss assessment and pest management, P105
   Tittonell P, 2014, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V8, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.08.006
   Van Keulen H., 1982, Simulation of poplar growth and crop production,Simulation Monographs, P87
   VANROERMUND HJW, 1990, NETH J PLANT PATHOL, V96, P17, DOI 10.1007/BF01976603
   Veresoglou SD, 2013, PLANT PATHOL, V62, P961, DOI 10.1111/ppa.12014
   Whish JPM, 2015, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V72, P418, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.10.010
   Willocquet L, 2008, FIELD CROP RES, V107, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.12.013
   Willocquet L, 2000, ECOL MODEL, V131, P133, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00271-4
   Willocquet L, 2018, PLANT PATHOL, V67, P1669, DOI 10.1111/ppa.12873
   Willocquet L, 2004, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V94, P672, DOI 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.7.672
   Willocquet L, 2002, ECOL MODEL, V153, P247, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00014-5
   ZADOKS J C, 1979, P427
   ZADOKS JC, 1985, ANNU REV PHYTOPATHOL, V23, P455, DOI 10.1146/annurev.py.23.090185.002323
NR 88
TC 19
Z9 19
U1 3
U2 55
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0378-4290
EI 1872-6852
J9 FIELD CROP RES
JI Field Crop. Res.
PD MAY 15
PY 2021
VL 265
AR 108108
DI 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108108
EA MAR 2021
PG 14
WC Agronomy
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA RJ6YU
UT WOS:000637747500010
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Mankin, JS
   Lehner, F
   Coats, S
   McKinnon, KA
AF Mankin, Justin S.
   Lehner, Flavio
   Coats, Sloan
   McKinnon, Karen A.
TI The Value of Initial Condition Large Ensembles to Robust Adaptation
   Decision-Making
SO EARTHS FUTURE
LA English
DT Article
DE large ensembles; robust decision-making; internal variability; initial
   conditions; climate adaptation
ID INTERNAL VARIABILITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FUTURE; RISK; TIME;
   PREDICTABILITY; UNCERTAINTIES; COMMUNICATION; TEMPERATURES; PREDICTION
AB The origins of uncertainty in climate projections have major consequences for the scientific and policy decisions made in response to climate change. Internal climate variability, for example, is an inherent uncertainty in the climate system that is undersampled by the multimodel ensembles used in most climate impacts research. Because of this, decision makers are left with the question of whether the range of climate projections across models is due to structural model choices, thus requiring more scientific investment to constrain, or instead is a set of equally plausible outcomes consistent with the same warming world. Similarly, many questions faced by scientists require a clear separation of model uncertainty and that arising from internal variability. With this as motivation and the renewed attention to large ensembles given planning for Phase 7 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP7), we illustrate the scientific and policy value of the attribution and quantification of uncertainty from initial condition large ensembles, particularly when analyzed in conjunction with multimodel ensembles. We focus on how large ensembles can support regional-scale robust adaptation decision-making in ways multimodel ensembles alone cannot. We also acknowledge several recently identified problems associated with large ensembles, namely, that they are (1) resource intensive, (2) redundant, and (3) biased. Despite these challenges, we show, using examples from hydroclimate, how large ensembles provide unique information for the scientific and policy communities and can be analyzed appropriately for regional-scale climate impacts research to help inform risk management in a warming world.
   Plain Language Summary Estimating uncertainties in projections of climate change poses challenges but is crucial to focusing scientific and policy efforts. Initial condition large ensembles (the same model run many times with the same set of assumptions) has revealed that irreducible uncertainty arising from natural variations in the climate system-called internal variability-can be larger and more persistent than expected when compared to the set of models typically used in climate impacts assessments. Because of this, some argue that the large magnitude of internal variability presents a challenge to effective adaptations in response to climate change. Here we show using examples from water management that characterizing internal variability, even if it is large and irreducible, is the means to more effective decision-making, pointing to the importance of initial condition large ensembles in this effort. We also discuss the criticisms of large ensembles: that they are costly, redundant, and biased. We show that despite these challenges, large ensembles provide unique information that is consistent with the insights from decision science about how to position effective decisions under conditions of deep uncertainty.
C1 [Mankin, Justin S.] Dartmouth Coll, Dept Geog, Hanover, NH 03755 USA.
   [Mankin, Justin S.] Columbia Univ, Lamont Doherty Earth Observ, New York, NY 10964 USA.
   [Lehner, Flavio] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Atmospher & Climate Sci, Zurich, Switzerland.
   [Lehner, Flavio] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA.
   [Coats, Sloan] Woods Hole Oceanog Inst, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA.
   [Coats, Sloan] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Dept Earth Sci, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA.
   [McKinnon, Karen A.] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Stat, Los Angeles, CA USA.
   [McKinnon, Karen A.] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Los Angeles, CA USA.
C3 Dartmouth College; Columbia University; Swiss Federal Institutes of
   Technology Domain; ETH Zurich; National Center Atmospheric Research
   (NCAR) - USA; Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; University of Hawaii
   System; University of Hawaii Manoa; University of California System;
   University of California Los Angeles; University of California System;
   University of California Los Angeles
RP Mankin, JS (corresponding author), Dartmouth Coll, Dept Geog, Hanover, NH 03755 USA.; Mankin, JS (corresponding author), Columbia Univ, Lamont Doherty Earth Observ, New York, NY 10964 USA.
EM mankin@dartmouth.edu
RI Lehner, Flavio/JPK-3751-2023; McKinnon, Karen/IAR-7268-2023; Mankin,
   Justin/N-2979-2017
OI Lehner, Flavio/0000-0003-4632-9701; McKinnon, Karen/0000-0003-3314-8442;
   Mankin, Justin/0000-0003-2520-4555; COATS, SLOAN/0000-0001-6741-613X
FU Swiss NSF [PZ00P2_174128]; NSF Division of Atmospheric and Geospace
   Sciences [AGS-0856145]; Regional and Global Model Analysis (RGMA)
   component of the Earth and Environmental System Modeling Program of the
   U.S.Department of Energy's Office of Biological & Environmental Research
   (BER) via NSF [IA 1844590]
FX We thank two anonymous reviewers, Noah Diffenbaugh, and Fran Moore for
   helpful discussions, as well as the participants of the U.S. CLIVAR
   Large Ensemble Workshop held at NCAR in July 2019. We also thank the
   Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) and their archiving of the Coupled
   Model Intercomparison Project (Phase 5) data, the US CLIVAR Working
   Group on Large Ensembles and the National Center for Atmospheric
   Research's Climate Data Gateway (NCAR ESG) for archiving the large
   ensemble data and the Cheyenne cluster, Arnold Song and Dartmouth's
   Discovery Computing Cluster, and Naomi Henderson and Haibo Liu for the
   data serving and computing support in the Division of Ocean and Climate
   Physics at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University. J.
   S. M. also thanks The Nelson A. Rockefeller Center at Dartmouth College.
   F. L. has been supported by the Swiss NSF (grant no. PZ00P2_174128), the
   NSF Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences (grant no.
   AGS-0856145, Amendment 87), and the Regional and Global Model Analysis
   (RGMA) component of the Earth and Environmental System Modeling Program
   of the U.S.Department of Energy's Office of Biological & Environmental
   Research (BER) via NSF IA 1844590. This is SOEST publication no. 11115.
CR Anderson J, 2009, B AM METEOROL SOC, V90, P1283, DOI 10.1175/2009BAMS2618.1
   Anderson JL, 1996, J CLIMATE, V9, P1518, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<1518:AMFPAE>2.0.CO;2
   [Anonymous], 2014, WALL STREET J
   Beusch L, 2020, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V11, P139, DOI 10.5194/esd-11-139-2020
   Borges J. L., 1941, CREACION PH GOSSE
   Cai WJ, 2018, NATURE, V564, P201, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0776-9
   Coats S, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P9225, DOI [10.1002/2016gl070445, 10.1002/2016GL070445]
   Cook BI, 2018, CURR CLIM CHANGE REP, V4, P164, DOI 10.1007/s40641-018-0093-2
   Danabasoglu G, 2020, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V12, DOI 10.1029/2019MS001916
   Daron JD, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034021
   De Stefano G, 2002, PHYS FLUIDS, V14, P362, DOI 10.1063/1.1421368
   Deser C, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P277, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0731-2
   Deser C, 2016, J CLIMATE, V29, P2237, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0304.1
   Deser C, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P775, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1562
   Deser C, 2012, CLIM DYNAM, V38, P527, DOI 10.1007/s00382-010-0977-x
   Dessai S, 2004, CLIM POLICY, V4, P107
   Dessai S, 2009, ADAPTING TO CLIMATE CHANGE: THRESHOLDS, VALUES, GOVERNANCE, P64
   Diffenbaugh NS, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P15774, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0506042102
   Ding H, 2018, J CLIMATE, V31, P5437, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0661.1
   Drótos G, 2015, J CLIMATE, V28, P3275, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00459.1
   Eade R, 2014, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V41, P5620, DOI 10.1002/2014GL061146
   Eyring V., 2015, Geoscientific Model Development Discussion, V8, p10,539, DOI DOI 10.5194/GMDD-8-10539-2015
   Gallo BT, 2017, WEATHER FORECAST, V32, P1541, DOI 10.1175/WAF-D-16-0178.1
   Giuntoli I, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V150, P149, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2280-5
   Hall A, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P269, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0436-6
   Hall A, 2014, SCIENCE, V346, P1461, DOI 10.1126/science.aaa0629
   Hausfather Z, 2020, NATURE, V577, P618, DOI 10.1038/d41586-020-00177-3
   Hawkins E, 2012, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V39, DOI 10.1029/2011GL050087
   Hawkins E, 2016, CLIM DYNAM, V46, P3807, DOI 10.1007/s00382-015-2806-8
   Hawkins E, 2011, CLIM DYNAM, V37, P407, DOI 10.1007/s00382-010-0810-6
   Hawkins E, 2009, B AM METEOROL SOC, V90, P1095, DOI 10.1175/2009BAMS2607.1
   Kay JE, 2015, B AM METEOROL SOC, V96, P1333, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00255.1
   Kirchmeier-Young MC, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P553, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0412.1
   Kirtman B., 2012, NOTES, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781107415324.023, DOI 10.1017/CB09781107415324.023]
   Kunreuther H, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P447, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1740, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1740]
   Laepple T, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P16682, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1412077111
   Lawrence J, 2020, NATURE, V580, P456, DOI 10.1038/d41586-020-01147-5
   Lehner F., 2020, Earth System Dynamics Discussions, P1, DOI DOI 10.5194/ESD-2019-93
   Lehner F, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P926, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0639-x
   Lehner F, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P7739, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0792.1
   Lempert D., 2013, WR992NSF
   Lempert J. L., 2003, SHAPING NEXT 100 YEA, P187
   Lempert R, 2001, NATURE, V412, P375, DOI 10.1038/35086617
   Lempert RJ, 2007, RISK ANAL, V27, P1009, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00940.x
   Lempert RJ, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P960, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.007
   Link R, 2019, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V12, P1477, DOI 10.5194/gmd-12-1477-2019
   LORENZ EN, 1963, J ATMOS SCI, V20, P130, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2
   Lorenz S, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V132, P143, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0809-1
   Machete RL, 2016, TELLUS A, V68, DOI 10.3402/tellusa.v68.28393
   Maher N, 2019, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V11, P2050, DOI 10.1029/2019MS001639
   Mankin JS, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa5efc
   Mankin JS, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/114016
   Marvel K, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/104010
   McKinnon KA, 2018, J CLIMATE, V31, P6783, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0901.1
   McKinnon KA, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P7585, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0905.1
   Meehl GA, 2009, B AM METEOROL SOC, V90, P1467, DOI 10.1175/2009BAMS2778.1
   Milinski S., 2019, DYNAMICS DISCUSSIONS, V1-19, DOI [10.5194/esd-2019-70, DOI 10.5194/ESD-2019-70]
   Palutikof JP, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V153, P607, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2177-3
   PateCornell ME, 1996, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V54, P95, DOI 10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00067-1
   Pendergrass AG, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P10551, DOI 10.1029/2019GL084826
   Pendergrass AG, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-17966-y
   Pielke RA, 2003, MODELS IN ECOSYSTEM SCIENCE, P111
   Poppick A, 2016, ANN APPL STAT, V10, P477, DOI 10.1214/16-AOAS903
   Riahi K, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P33, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y
   Rodgers KB, 2015, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V12, P3301, DOI 10.5194/bg-12-3301-2015
   Saffioti C, 2015, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V42, P2385, DOI 10.1002/2015GL063091
   Scaife AA, 2019, ATMOS SCI LETT, V20, DOI 10.1002/asl.922
   Scaife AA, 2018, NPJ CLIM ATMOS SCI, V1, DOI 10.1038/s41612-018-0038-4
   Schneider T, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P3, DOI 10.1038/nclimate3190
   Schwartz CS, 2019, B AM METEOROL SOC, V100, P321, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0297.1
   Selten FM, 2004, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V31, DOI 10.1029/2004GL020739
   Simpson IR, 2019, NAT GEOSCI, V12, P613, DOI 10.1038/s41561-019-0391-x
   Sippel S, 2019, J CLIMATE, V32, P5677, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0882.1
   Sterl A, 2008, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V35, DOI 10.1029/2008GL034071
   Stern PC, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P607, DOI 10.1038/nclimate1929
   Sutton RT, 2019, B AM METEOROL SOC, V100, P1637, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0280.1
   Thompson DWJ, 2015, J CLIMATE, V28, P6443, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00830.1
   Tokarska KB, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aaz9549
   US CLIVAR, 2020, SUMM US CLIVAR LARG
   Vano JA, 2018, CLIM SERV, V12, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2018.07.002
   Wallace JM, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P14337, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1204875109
   Weaver CP, 2013, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V4, P39, DOI 10.1002/wcc.202
   Yeager SG, 2018, B AM METEOROL SOC, V99, P1867, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0098.1
   Zhang BS, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P10522, DOI 10.1029/2019GL083926
NR 84
TC 58
Z9 63
U1 1
U2 13
PU AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
PI WASHINGTON
PA 2000 FLORIDA AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20009 USA
EI 2328-4277
J9 EARTHS FUTURE
JI Earth Future
PD OCT
PY 2020
VL 8
IS 10
AR e2012EF001610
DI 10.1029/2020EF001610
PG 14
WC Environmental Sciences; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology &
   Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences
GA OO3XX
UT WOS:000587316800019
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Davlasheridze, M
   Atoba, KO
   Brody, S
   Highfield, W
   Merrell, W
   Ebersole, B
   Purdue, A
   Gilmer, RW
AF Davlasheridze, Meri
   Atoba, Kayode O.
   Brody, Samuel
   Highfield, Wesley
   Merrell, William
   Ebersole, Bruce
   Purdue, Adam
   Gilmer, Robert W.
TI Economic impacts of storm surge and the cost-benefit analysis of a
   coastal spine as the surge mitigation strategy in Houston-Galveston area
   in the USA
SO MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE
LA English
DT Article
DE Coastal spine; Flood damage; Industrial; Petrochemical; Economic losses;
   Disaster impacts; Storm surge; Hazus; IMPLAN; Houston; Galveston
ID CLIMATE ADAPTATION; FLOOD RISK; MODEL; RESILIENCE; EARTHQUAKE;
   VULNERABILITY; CONSERVATION; DISASTERS; HEALTH
AB Rapid population growth, urbanization, and concentration of valuable assets and strategic infrastructure in coastal regions make coastal inundation, flooding, and storm surge national problems for many countries, including theUnited States of America (USA). Enhancing coastal resilience is a complex problem and involves an integrated risk management approach, entailing both structural protection as well as other risk reduction strategies (e.g., building codes and ecosystem preservation). The former is an increasingly recognized mitigation option for densely populated areas and industrial hubs. Fully justifying benefits of costly flood defense structures is crucial, particularly when lack of funding and other institutional barriers make such projects easy targets for omission from or cuts to a budget. Justification usually requires a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis. This paper explores the economic feasibility of a coastal barrier, i.e., coastal spine, as a potential storm surge mitigation strategy to protect the Houston-Galveston metropolitan area of Texas, one of the most flood-prone and economically important regions in the USA. We provide an assessment of residential and chemical manufacturing plant and refinery exposure to multiple synthetic hurricane storm surge events by comparing losses with and without a coastal spine. While under all scenarios, benefits exceed engineering costs of a spine, our results indicate that the project feasibility largely hinges on accounting for industrial losses and resultant indirect and induced effects. As many regions and industrial hubs globally are designing adaptation and mitigation strategies to combat the consequences of extreme events, structural solution to surge mitigation maybe one of the few mitigation options for them. Unlike population and residential structures that can retreat and insure, these options are not viable for industrial plants that are resource-based. However, expertise and knowledge pertinent to surge barrier systems are relatively scarce as there are only handful of barriers around the world and they are all unique in engineering designs. As storm surge is becoming a threat for many coastal urban centers, one of the recommendations is to consolidate knowledge base and research across countries in order to foster knowledge exchange internationally. This will help identify concerns associated with existing barrier systems, pragmatic ways to improve them and will also aid the investment decision, engineering designs, and operational aspects of barriers in other parts of the world. Furthermore, forming regional research collaborations with developing countries at risk of storm surge and the sea level rise is vital to further facilitate knowledge spillover and exchange of expertise.
C1 [Davlasheridze, Meri] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Marine Sci, 1001 Texas Clipper Rd,Bld 3029,Off 362, Galveston, TX 77553 USA.
   [Atoba, Kayode O.] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture & Urban Planning, 3137 TAMU, College Stn, TX 77843 USA.
   [Brody, Samuel] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Marine Sci, 1001 Texas Clipper Rd,Bld 3003,Off 366, Galveston, TX 77554 USA.
   [Highfield, Wesley] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Marine Sci, 1001 Texas Clipper Rd,Bld 3003,Off 364, Galveston, TX 77554 USA.
   [Merrell, William] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Marine Sci, 1001 Texas Clipper Rd,Bld 3003,Off 104, Galveston, TX 77554 USA.
   [Ebersole, Bruce] Jackson State Univ, Jackson, MS 39217 USA.
   [Purdue, Adam; Gilmer, Robert W.] Univ Houston, CT Bauer Coll Business, Inst Reg Forecasting, Univ Classroom & Business Bldg,Room 302M, Houston, TX 77204 USA.
C3 Texas A&M University System; Texas A&M University System; Texas A&M
   University College Station; Texas A&M University System; Texas A&M
   University System; Texas A&M University System; Jackson State
   University; University of Houston System; University of Houston
RP Davlasheridze, M (corresponding author), Texas A&M Univ, Dept Marine Sci, 1001 Texas Clipper Rd,Bld 3029,Off 362, Galveston, TX 77553 USA.
EM davlashm@tamu.edu; kayodeatoba@tamu.edu; brodys@tamug.edu;
   highfiew@tamug.edu; merrellw@tamug.edu; j00773943@jsums.edu;
   awperdueuh@gmail.com; rwgilmer@uh.edu
RI Highfield, Wesley/AHB-4536-2022
OI Atoba, Kayode/0000-0003-4616-7917; , Meri/0000-0001-5468-7192
FU US National Science Foundation [1545837]; Office Of Internatl Science
   &Engineering; Office Of The Director [1545837] Funding Source: National
   Science Foundation
FX This paper is based on research supported by the US National Science
   Foundation (Grant No. 1545837). The findings and opinions reported are
   those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the funding
   organizations or those who provided assistance with various aspects of
   the study.
CR Aerts JCJH, 2013, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1294, P1, DOI 10.1111/nyas.12200
   Allan RP, 2008, SCIENCE, V321, P1481, DOI 10.1126/science.1160787
   [Anonymous], 2001, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:1(1), 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:1(1, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:1(1]
   Anthoff D, 2010, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V15, P321, DOI 10.1007/s11027-010-9220-7
   Bender C, 2013, COAST ENG, V73, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2012.10.003
   Bierbaum R, 2013, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V18, P361, DOI 10.1007/s11027-012-9423-1
   Bokarjova M., 2004, DISASTER PREVENTION, V13, P330, DOI DOI 10.1108/09653560410556555
   Botzen WJW, 2013, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V18, P229, DOI 10.1007/s11027-012-9359-5
   Brody SD, 2008, DISASTERS, V32, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01024.x
   Bryant MA, 2017, J WATERW PORT COAST, V143, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000412
   Burleson DW, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V77, P1183, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1652-7
   Cavallo E, 2011, INT REV ENVIRON RESO, V5, P63, DOI 10.1561/101.00000039
   Cialone MA, 2017, J WATERW PORT COAST, V143, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000408
   Cochrane Hal., 2004, Disaster Prevention and Management, V13, P290, DOI [DOI 10.1108/09653560410556500, 10.1108/09653560410556500]
   Davlasheridze M, 2017, REV REG STUD, V47, P93
   Davlasheridze M, 2017, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V81, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2016.09.005
   de Moel H, 2015, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V20, P865, DOI 10.1007/s11027-015-9654-z
   DelRossi AF, 1999, J PUBLIC ECON, V71, P247, DOI 10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00071-1
   Ding A., 2008, Natural Hazards Review, V9, P20, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2008)9:1(20)
   Dircke PTM, 2013, GLOBAL OVERVIEW NAVI, P150
   Emanuel KA, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P12219, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1301293110
   FEMA, 2008, HURR IK IMP REP
   FEMA, 2017, MULT LOSS EST METH F
   FEMA, 2006, HAZ MH FLOOD TECHN M
   Ganderton P.T., 2005, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, P445, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11027-005-0055-6
   Goetz SJ, 2015, SOC INDIC RES, V124, P657, DOI 10.1007/s11205-014-0792-6
   Griggs Troy., 2017, The New York Times
   Grinsted A, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P5369, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1209980110
   Haines A, 2006, PUBLIC HEALTH, V120, P585, DOI 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.01.002
   Hallegatte S, 2008, RISK ANAL, V28, P779, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01046.x
   Hallegatte S, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9981-8
   Highfield W E., 2017, Identifying the future costs of flooding in the Houston-Galveston region. Center for Texas Beaches and Shores
   Hope ME, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V118, P4424, DOI 10.1002/jgrc.20314
   Houston Galveston Area Council, 2017, REG GROWTH FOR
   Hydrocarbon Publishing Company, 2016, MULT STRAT REP
   Jensen RE, 2017, J WATERW PORT COAST, V143, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000342
   Jonkman S.N., 2015, Coastal spine system - interim design report. Version 0.6 (final report)
   Kirgiz K., 2009, J BUS VALUAT EC LOSS, V4
   Knutson TR, 2013, J CLIMATE, V26, P6591, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00539.1
   Kousky C, 2014, ENERG ECON, V46, P576, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.029
   Kousky C, 2014, ECOL ECON, V104, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.001
   Kousky C, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V124, P9, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1106-3
   Kousky C, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P3563, DOI 10.1021/es303938c
   Krausmann E, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V67, P811, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0607-0
   Lazarus ED, 2011, NONLINEAR PROC GEOPH, V18, P989, DOI 10.5194/npg-18-989-2011
   Lazarus ED, 2011, MAR GEOL, V281, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.margeo.2011.02.002
   MacKenzie CA, 2012, INT J PROD ECON, V138, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.032
   McNamara DE, 2011, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V38, DOI 10.1029/2011GL047207
   Mechler R, 2010, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V15, P611, DOI 10.1007/s11027-010-9245-y
   (MIG) Minnesota IMPLAN Group, 2012, IMP AN PLANN IMPLAN
   Mooyaart L., 2014, Coastal Engineering Proceedings, V1, P45, DOI DOI 10.9753/ICCE.V34.STRUCTURES.45
   Norio O, 2011, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V2, P34, DOI 10.1007/s13753-011-0004-9
   Okuyama Y., 2004, DISAST PREVENT MANAG, V4, P297, DOI DOI 10.1108/09653560410556519
   Parisi F, 2008, J CLIMATE, V21, P403, DOI 10.1175/2007JCLI1772.1
   Pielke R. A., 2008, Nat. hazards Rev, V9, P29, DOI [10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2008)9:1(29), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2008)9:1(29), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2008)9:1(29)]
   Pilkey O.H., 2008, The rising sea
   Port of Houston, 2017, PORT HOUST OV
   Prtner H.O, 2022, Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, P3056, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844]
   Razafindrabe BHN, 2014, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V19, P177, DOI 10.1007/s11027-012-9433-z
   Rebuild Texas, 2017, REQ FED DIS ASS CRIT
   Ridder M, 2012, ASCE P COAST ENG C S
   Rose A, 2005, J REGIONAL SCI, V45, P75, DOI 10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00365.x
   Rose A., 2004, Modelling spatial and economic impacts of disasters, P119
   Rose A, 2007, RISK ANAL, V27, P513, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00912.x
   Rose A, 2013, ECON SYST RES, V25, P212, DOI 10.1080/09535314.2012.731379
   Rose AZ, 2009, PEACE ECON PEACE SCI, V15, DOI 10.2202/1554-8597.1161
   Rose A, 2011, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V27, P539, DOI 10.1193/1.3587204
   Rose Adam., 2004, Disaster Prevention and Management, V13, P307, DOI [10.1108/09653560410556528, DOI 10.1108/09653560410556528]
   Rose AZ, 2010, PEACE ECON PEACE SCI, V16, DOI 10.2202/1554-8597.1189
   Rose AZ, 2009, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V6, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-3156.1978.tb00379.x
   Rose AZ, 2009, 75 CREATE HOM SEC CT
   Ruiz Fuentes MJ, 2014, THESIS
   Scawthorn C., 2006, Natural Hazards Review, V7, P60, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(60)
   Scawthorn C., 2006, NAT HAZARDS REV, V7, P60, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(72)
   Smith MD, 2009, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V58, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2008.07.011
   Stoeten K. J., 2013, THESIS
   SURGEDAT, 2017, SURGEDAT WORLDS STOR
   Sweet W., 2018, Patterns and projections of high tide flooding along the U.S. coastline using a common impact threshold
   Tate E, 2015, NAT HAZARDS REV, V16, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000167
   Thompson EF, 1996, J WATERW PORT COAST, V122, P195, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1996)122:4(195)
   U.S. Climate Change Science Program, 2008, WEATH CLIM EXTR CHAN
   U. S. Department of Energy, 2009, INFR SEC EN REST OFF
   UNISDR, 2006, HYOG FRAM ACT 2005 2
   UNISDR, 2015, Annex 1: GAR Global Risk Assessment: Data, Methodology, Sources and Usage, P35
   van der Pol TD, 2017, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V22, P267, DOI 10.1007/s11027-015-9637-0
   Villarini G, 2013, J CLIMATE, V26, P3231, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00441.1
   Walsh KJE, 2016, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V7, P65, DOI 10.1002/wcc.371
   Wei D., 2013, EC IMPACT SEA LEVEL
   WESTERINK JJ, 1992, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V118, P1373, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:10(1373)
   Wing IS, 2016, NAT HAZARDS REV, V17, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000173
   Zerbe Richard., 1994, Benefit-Cost Analysis in Theory and Practice
NR 91
TC 29
Z9 33
U1 3
U2 77
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 1381-2386
EI 1573-1596
J9 MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL
JI Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang.
PD MAR
PY 2019
VL 24
IS 3
BP 329
EP 354
DI 10.1007/s11027-018-9814-z
PG 26
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA HI2HB
UT WOS:000456264900001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU van Woesik, R
   Shiroma, K
   Koksal, S
AF van Woesik, Robert
   Shiroma, Kazuyo
   Koksal, Semen
TI Phenotypic Variance Predicts Symbiont Population Densities in Corals: A
   Modeling Approach
SO PLOS ONE
LA English
DT Article
ID GREAT-BARRIER-REEF; PHOTOCHEMICAL EFFICIENCY; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; DIURNAL
   CHANGES; PHOTOSYSTEM-II; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ZOOXANTHELLAE; DIVERSITY;
   EVOLUTION; PATTERNS
AB Background: We test whether the phenotypic variance of symbionts (Symbiodinium) in corals is closely related with the capacity of corals to acclimatize to increasing seawater temperatures. Moreover, we assess whether more specialist symbionts will increase within coral hosts under ocean warming. The present study is only applicable to those corals that naturally have the capacity to support more than one type of Symbiodinium within the lifetime of a colony; for example, Montastraea annularis and Montastraea faveolata.
   Methodology/Principal Findings: The population dynamics of competing Symbiodinium symbiont populations were projected through time in coral hosts using a novel, discrete time optimal-resource model. Models were run for two Atlantic Ocean localities. Four symbiont populations, with different environmental optima and phenotypic variances, were modeled to grow, divide, and compete in the corals under seasonal fluctuations in solar insolation and seawater temperature. Elevated seawater temperatures were input into the model 1.5 degrees C above the seasonal summer average, and the symbiont population response was observed for each location. The models showed dynamic fluctuations in Symbiodinium populations densities within corals. Population density predictions for Lee Stocking Island, the Bahamas, where temperatures were relatively homogenous throughout the year, showed a dominance of both type 2, with high phenotypic variance, and type 1, a high-temperature and high-insolation specialist. Whereas the densities of Symbiodinium types 3 and 4, a high-temperature, low-insolation specialist, and a high-temperature, low-insolation generalist, remained consistently low. Predictions for Key Largo, Florida, where environmental conditions were more seasonally variable, showed the coexistence of generalists (types 2 and 4) and low densities of specialists (types 1 and 3). When elevated temperatures were input into the model, population densities in corals at Lee Stocking Island showed an emergence of high-temperature specialists. However, even under high temperatures, corals in the Florida Keys were dominated by generalists.
   Conclusions/Significance: Predictions at higher seawater temperatures showed endogenous shuffling and an emergence of the high-temperature Symbiodinium specialists, even though their phenotypic variance was low. The model shows that sustaining these "hidden'' specialists becomes advantageous under thermal stress conditions, and shuffling symbionts may increase the corals' capacity to acclimatize but not adapt to climatechange-induced ocean warming.
C1 [van Woesik, Robert; Shiroma, Kazuyo] Florida Inst Technol, Dept Biol Sci, Melbourne, FL 32901 USA.
   [Koksal, Semen] Florida Inst Technol, Dept Math Sci, Melbourne, FL 32901 USA.
C3 Florida Institute of Technology; Florida Institute of Technology
RP van Woesik, R (corresponding author), Florida Inst Technol, Dept Biol Sci, Melbourne, FL 32901 USA.
EM rvw@fit.edu
FU Okinawa International Exchange & Human Resources Development Foundation;
   World Bank; Global Environmental Facility; Coral Bleaching; Local
   Environmental Responses working group
FX Funding for study to KS was provided by the Okinawa International
   Exchange & Human Resources Development Foundation. This research was
   supported in part by the World Bank and the Global Environmental
   Facility through the Coral Reef Targeted Research and Capacity Building
   for Management program, Coral Bleaching and Local Environmental
   Responses working group. The funders had no role in study design, data
   collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the
   manuscript.
CR Baker AC, 2001, NATURE, V411, P765, DOI 10.1038/35081151
   Baker AC, 2003, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V34, P661, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132417
   Baker AC, 2004, NATURE, V430, P741, DOI 10.1038/430741a
   Baskett ML, 2009, ECOL APPL, V19, P3, DOI 10.1890/08-0139.1
   Berkelmans R, 2002, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V229, P73, DOI 10.3354/meps229073
   BRADSHAW AD, 1991, PHILOS T R SOC B, V333, P289, DOI 10.1098/rstb.1991.0079
   Brown BE, 1997, CORAL REEFS, V16, pS129, DOI 10.1007/s003380050249
   Brown BE, 1999, CORAL REEFS, V18, P99
   BUDDEMEIER RW, 1993, BIOSCIENCE, V43, P320, DOI 10.2307/1312064
   Chen CA, 2005, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V295, P113, DOI 10.3354/meps295113
   Day T, 2008, AM NAT, V171, pE72, DOI 10.1086/524956
   Dunn SR, 2002, J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL, V272, P29, DOI 10.1016/S0022-0981(02)00036-9
   Fagoonee I, 1999, SCIENCE, V283, P843, DOI 10.1126/science.283.5403.843
   FALKOWSKI PG, 1984, BIOSCIENCE, V34, P705, DOI 10.2307/1309663
   Fitt WK, 2001, CORAL REEFS, V20, P51, DOI 10.1007/s003380100146
   Fitt WK, 2001, MAR BIOL, V139, P507
   Fitt WK, 2000, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V45, P677, DOI 10.4319/lo.2000.45.3.0677
   GATES RD, 1992, BIOL BULL, V182, P324, DOI 10.2307/1542252
   Gingerich PD, 2000, J THEOR BIOL, V204, P201, DOI 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2008
   GLYNN PW, 1991, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V6, P175, DOI 10.1016/0169-5347(91)90208-F
   GLYNN PW, 1993, CORAL REEFS, V12, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00303779
   Goulet TL, 2006, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V321, P1, DOI 10.3354/meps321001
   Hellmann JJ, 2007, BIOL CONSERV, V137, P599, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.03.018
   Hoegh-Guldberg O, 1999, MAR FRESHWATER RES, V50, P839, DOI 10.1071/MF99078
   Hubbell S.P., 2001, MG POP BIOL, V32
   HUSTON M, 1979, AM NAT, V113, P81, DOI 10.1086/283366
   Hutchinson GE, 1941, AM NAT, V75, P406, DOI 10.1086/280983
   Iglesias-Prieto R, 2004, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V271, P1757, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2004.2757
   Jones RJ, 1997, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V352, P457, DOI 10.1098/rstb.1997.0033
   Jones RJ, 2001, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V24, P89, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00648.x
   Kinzie RA, 2001, BIOL BULL, V200, P51, DOI 10.2307/1543084
   LaJeunesse TC, 2005, MOL BIOL EVOL, V22, P570, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msi042
   LaJeunesse TC, 2003, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V48, P2046, DOI 10.4319/lo.2003.48.5.2046
   LaJeunesse TC, 2002, MAR BIOL, V141, P387, DOI 10.1007/s00227-002-0829-2
   Little AF, 2004, SCIENCE, V304, P1492, DOI 10.1126/science.1095733
   Loya Y, 2001, ECOL LETT, V4, P122, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00203.x
   McClanahan T, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P543, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0543:EOTCME]2.0.CO;2
   MUSCATINE L, 1969, BIOL BULL-US, V137, P506, DOI 10.2307/1540172
   Norberg J, 2001, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V98, P11376, DOI 10.1073/pnas.171315998
   Pillay RM, 2005, SYMBIOSIS, V38, P209
   Pulliam HR, 2000, ECOL LETT, V3, P349, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00143.x
   ROWAN R, 1992, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V89, P3639, DOI 10.1073/pnas.89.8.3639
   ROWAN R, 1991, SCIENCE, V251, P1348, DOI 10.1126/science.251.4999.1348
   Rowan R, 2004, NATURE, V430, P742, DOI 10.1038/430742a
   Rowan R, 1997, NATURE, V388, P265, DOI 10.1038/40843
   Sampayo EM, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P10444, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0708049105
   Santos SR, 2004, J PHYCOL, V40, P395, DOI 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2004.03186.x
   Scheffer M, 2006, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V103, P6230, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0508024103
   Sheppard CRC, 2003, NATURE, V425, P294, DOI 10.1038/nature01987
   Stanley GD, 2001, SCIENCE, V291, P1913, DOI 10.1126/science.1056632
   Stimson J, 1997, J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL, V214, P35, DOI 10.1016/S0022-0981(96)02753-0
   Takahashi S, 2004, PLANT CELL PHYSIOL, V45, P251, DOI 10.1093/pcp/pch028
   Taylor DL., 1974, Symbiosis in the sea, P245
   Thompson DM, 2009, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V276, P2893, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2009.0591
   Thornhill DJ, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006262
   Thornhill DJ, 2006, MAR BIOL, V148, P711, DOI 10.1007/s00227-005-0114-2
   Tilman D, 1997, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V94, P1857, DOI 10.1073/pnas.94.5.1857
   Toller WW, 2001, BIOL BULL-US, V201, P348, DOI 10.2307/1543613
   van Woesik R, 2006, ECOL LETT, V9, P390, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00886.x
   van Woesik R., 2002, Comments on Theoretical Biology, V7, P201, DOI 10.1080/08948550214054
   VANWOESIK R, 2006, COASTAL ESTUARINE ST, V61, P129
   Wagner D, 2008, B MAR SCI, V83, P553
   Ware JR, 1996, ECOL MODEL, V84, P199, DOI 10.1016/0304-3800(94)00132-4
   Warner ME, 2006, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V51, P1887, DOI 10.4319/lo.2006.51.4.1887
   Warner ME, 1999, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V96, P8007, DOI 10.1073/pnas.96.14.8007
   Warner ME, 2002, MAR BIOL, V141, P31, DOI 10.1007/s00227-002-0807-8
NR 66
TC 7
Z9 8
U1 1
U2 11
PU PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
PI SAN FRANCISCO
PA 1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA
SN 1932-6203
J9 PLOS ONE
JI PLoS One
PD FEB 12
PY 2010
VL 5
IS 2
AR e9185
DI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009185
PG 8
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA 554ZC
UT WOS:000274474600006
PM 20169202
OA gold, Green Published, Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Huan, DB
   Yan, Q
AF Huan, Dubin
   Yan, Qing
TI Asymmetric and Irreversible Response of Tropical Cyclone Potential
   Intensity to CO<sub>2</sub> Removal
SO GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
LA English
DT Article
DE tropical cyclone; carbon dioxide removal; potential intensity
ID GENESIS FACTORS; SIMULATIONS; MIGRATION; RAINFALL; TRENDS
AB Understanding the behaviors of tropical cyclone (TC) intensity under the CO2 removal scenario is important for future climate adaptation and policy making. Based on the idealized CO2 ramp-up (from 284.7 to 1,138.8 ppm) and symmetric ramp-down experiments, our results suggest an asymmetric and irreversible response of TC potential intensity to CO2 reduction. Potential intensity shows an additional enhancement at the same CO2 level during the CO2 ramp-down relative to the ramp-up periods (though with regional differences), and does not completely return to the initial value even when CO2 recovers on multi-decadal to centennial timescale. The enhanced potential intensity is dominated by the increased thermodynamic disequilibrium, which is mainly attributed to the weakened surface winds arising from the El Nino-like warming pattern and inter-hemispheric ocean temperature contrast. Our results highlight the potential risks of stronger storms on the socioeconomic development under the negative carbon emissions pathways. Tropical cyclone (TC) is one of the most destructive natural disasters worldwide. Many studies pointed to the intensification of Tropical cyclones (TCs) in the warming future and thus it is important to limit the amplitude of global warming and mitigate the potential risks of enhanced TCs. This study examines whether TC potential intensity may return to its initial state with the CO2 removal method based on the idealized CO2 forcing experiments, in which CO2 increases from the preindustrial to quadruple level (284.7-1,138.8 ppm) and decreases symmetrically. Our results suggest an asymmetric and irreversible response of TC potential intensity to CO2 removal, with an additional enhancement at the same CO2 level during the CO2 ramp-down relative to the ramp-up periods. Moreover, potential intensity does not fully recover to the initial state even when CO2 is restored on multi-decadal to centennial timescale. The increased potential intensity during the CO2 ramp-down relative to the ramp-up periods is dominated by the increased thermodynamic disequilibrium. This is further linked with the uneven sea surface temperature response and the resultant weakened surface wind speed. This study helps understand the response of TC activity under future mitigation pathways and highlights the potential risks of the enhanced storm intensity.
C1 [Huan, Dubin; Yan, Qing] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, Nansen Zhu Int Res Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Huan, Dubin] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Yan, Qing] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast & Evaluat Meteorol, Key Lab Meteorol Disaster, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
C3 Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Atmospheric Physics, CAS;
   Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,
   CAS; Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology
RP Yan, Q (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, Nansen Zhu Int Res Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China.; Yan, Q (corresponding author), Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast & Evaluat Meteorol, Key Lab Meteorol Disaster, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
EM yanqing@mail.iap.ac.cn
RI Yan, Qing/C-5413-2013
OI Yan, Qing/0000-0001-5299-7824
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [42221004]; Youth
   Innovation Promotion Association by CAS
FX We sincerely thank the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive
   and insightful comments that help greatly improve the quality of the
   manuscript. We appreciate the World Climate Research Programme's Working
   Group on Coupled Modeling which is responsible for CMIP6, and the
   climate modeling groups for producing and making available their model
   output. This research was funded by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (42221004) and the Youth Innovation Promotion
   Association by CAS (Q. Yan).
CR An SI, 2022, NPJ CLIM ATMOS SCI, V5, DOI 10.1038/s41612-022-00246-6
   An SI, 2021, EARTHS FUTURE, V9, DOI 10.1029/2021EF002165
   Bister M, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V107, DOI 10.1029/2001JD000776
   Cao L, 2011, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V38, DOI 10.1029/2011GL046713
   Chang P, 2020, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V12, DOI 10.1029/2020MS002298
   Emanuel K, 2007, J CLIMATE, V20, P5497, DOI 10.1175/2007JCLI1571.1
   Emanuel K, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-27364-8
   Emanuel K, 2010, J ADV MODEL EARTH SY, V2, DOI 10.3894/JAMES.2010.2.1
   Eyring V, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P1937, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
   Fedorov AV, 2010, NATURE, V463, P1066, DOI 10.1038/nature08831
   Field CB, 2017, SCIENCE, V356, P706, DOI 10.1126/science.aam9726
   Gilford DM, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P6085, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0827.1
   Hearty PJ, 2017, MAR GEOL, V390, P347, DOI 10.1016/j.margeo.2017.05.009
   Keller DP, 2018, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V11, P1133, DOI 10.5194/gmd-11-1133-2018
   Kim HS, 2014, J CLIMATE, V27, P8034, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00475.1
   Kim SY, 2023, SCI ADV, V9, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.adg1801
   Kim SK, 2022, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V12, P834, DOI 10.1038/s41558-022-01452-z
   Klotzbach PJ, 2022, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V49, DOI 10.1029/2021GL095774
   Knutson T, 2020, B AM METEOROL SOC, V101, pE303, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0194.1
   Knutson T, 2019, B AM METEOROL SOC, V100, P1987, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0189.1
   Knutson TR, 2015, J CLIMATE, V28, P7203, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0129.1
   Korty RL, 2012, J CLIMATE, V25, P8196, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00033.1
   Korty RL, 2012, J CLIMATE, V25, P4348, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00517.1
   Kossin James P, 2020, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, V117, P11975, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1920849117
   Kossin JP, 2014, NATURE, V509, P349, DOI 10.1038/nature13278
   Krencker FN, 2015, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V425, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.06.003
   Kug JS, 2022, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V12, P47, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-01211-6
   Lee CY, 2020, J CLIMATE, V33, P4815, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0452.1
   Liu C, 2024, NPJ CLIM ATMOS SCI, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41612-024-00632-2
   Liu C, 2023, SCI ADV, V9, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.adh8442
   Oh JH, 2024, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41558-024-01928-0
   Peduzzi P, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P289, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1410
   Pérez-Alarcón A, 2023, ENVIRON PROCESS, V10, DOI 10.1007/s40710-023-00649-4
   Peters GP, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P4, DOI 10.1038/nclimate1783
   Rappaport EN, 2000, B AM METEOROL SOC, V81, P2065, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<2065:LOLITU>2.3.CO;2
   Roberts MJ, 2020, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V47, DOI 10.1029/2020GL088662
   Rogelj J, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P248, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1385, 10.1038/nclimate1385]
   Schmidt S, 2009, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V29, P359, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.03.003
   Shan KY, 2023, NATURE, V623, P83, DOI 10.1038/s41586-023-06544-0
   Song SY, 2022, SCI BULL, V67, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2021.08.013
   Tang RM, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V902, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166052
   UNFCCC, 2015, FCCCCP2015L9REV1
   Vaughan NE, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P745, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0027-7
   Wang GH, 2022, NATURE, V611, P496, DOI 10.1038/s41586-022-05326-4
   Wang S, 2020, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V47, DOI 10.1029/2020GL088589
   Wang S, 2021, SCIENCE, V371, P514, DOI 10.1126/science.abb9038
   Wing AA, 2015, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V42, P8669, DOI 10.1002/2015GL066145
   Wu LG, 2023, ENVIRON RES LETT, V18, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/acec8a
   Wu LG, 2022, ADV ATMOS SCI, V39, P205, DOI 10.1007/s00376-021-1026-x
   Yan Q, 2023, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V120, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2301018120
   Yan Q, 2021, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V48, DOI 10.1029/2021GL093946
   Yan Q, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-11110-2
   Yan Q, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P12963, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1608950113
   Ye MQ, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab9be2
   Zhang SQ, 2023, NPJ CLIM ATMOS SCI, V6, DOI 10.1038/s41612-023-00338-x
   Zhou SJ, 2022, SCI BULL, V67, P1702, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2022.07.010
NR 56
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 5
U2 5
PU AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
PI WASHINGTON
PA 2000 FLORIDA AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20009 USA
SN 0094-8276
EI 1944-8007
J9 GEOPHYS RES LETT
JI Geophys. Res. Lett.
PD JUL 28
PY 2024
VL 51
IS 14
AR e2024GL109269
DI 10.1029/2024GL109269
PG 9
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology
GA ZA1V2
UT WOS:001272487800001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Dabral, A
   Meena, RK
   Shankhwar, R
   Kant, R
   Pandey, S
   Ginwal, HS
   Bhandari, MS
AF Dabral, Aman
   Meena, Rajendra K.
   Shankhwar, Rajeev
   Kant, Rama
   Pandey, Shailesh
   Ginwal, Harish S.
   Bhandari, Maneesh S.
TI Spatial Population Structuring and Genetic Analysis of Exotic Grevillea
   robusta in Northwestern India
SO FOREST SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Grevillea robusta; microsatellite markers; polymorphism; genetic
   diversity; genetic differentiation; tree improvement
ID CROSS-SPECIES AMPLIFICATION; FRAGMENTED POPULATIONS; DIVERSITY; SHRUB;
   DIFFERENTIATION; SOFTWARE; GROWTH; HETEROZYGOSITY; PROVENANCES; MARKERS
AB The introduction of exotics is common in forestry, and majorly important species, like eucalypts, poplar, and Casuarina sp., occupy vast areas in the Indian subcontinent. Importantly, with the latest cost-effective sequencing techniques, genetic diversity research through molecular marker approaches on major exotics provides novel information for genetic improvement in economic traits with climatic adaptation. The study was carried out on Grevillea robusta to assess genetic relatedness and diversity among 228 genotypes belonging to five northwestern states in India. These genotypes were assayed using twelve simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. A population structure analysis using structure software identified four major gene pool subgroups with clear-cut differences from each other. Principal coordinate analysis also supports the clustering patterns of the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean analysis. In the case of genetic diversity assessment, a total of seventy-three alleles were detected from twelve SSRs, with an average of 6.08 +/- 0.71 per locus. Polymorphism information content ranged from 0.17 to 0.67 with a mean of 0.44 +/- 0.045, indicating high levels of polymorphism across the genotypes. All the evaluated SSRs demonstrated moderate genetic diversity (observed heterozygosity = 0.31 +/- 0.03; expected heterozygosity = 0.32 +/- 0.03; and genetic differentiation = 0.295) among the sampled genotypes. These findings indicate significant genetic variability in the germplasm to warrant selection and have potential for a long-term tree improvement program of G. robusta in India.Study Implications: The study on population genetics of Grevillea robusta in exotic environments assessed probable gene pools, provenances, and genetic diversity in geographical distribution range of the species in the Indian scenario. The basic population genetic measures revealed the high diversity areas and probable seed zones of G. robusta in its exotic range. Importantly, the study will be helpful in the selection of candidate plus trees of G. robusta to further strengthen the genotype x environment interaction study for future breeding programs. Further, studying the genetic makeup for moderately diverse species offers valuable insights into evolutionary history, population dynamics, and ecological interactions, which may lead to conservation efforts and guidance for the management of trees such as G. robusta in their native and introduced regions.
C1 [Dabral, Aman; Meena, Rajendra K.; Shankhwar, Rajeev; Kant, Rama; Ginwal, Harish S.; Bhandari, Maneesh S.] ICFRE Forest Res Inst, Div Genet & Tree Improvement, Dehra Dun 248195, Uttarakhand, India.
   [Pandey, Shailesh] ICFRE Forest Res Inst, Div Forest Protect, Forest Pathol Discipline, Dehra Dun 248006, Uttarakhand, India.
   [Ginwal, Harish S.] ICFRE Trop Forest Res Inst, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
RP Bhandari, MS (corresponding author), ICFRE Forest Res Inst, Div Genet & Tree Improvement, Dehra Dun 248195, Uttarakhand, India.
EM amandabral93@gmail.com; rajendra@icfre.org; 1986sergent@gmail.com;
   ramakant@icfre.org; pandeysh@icfre.org; ginwalhs@icfre.org;
   bhandarims@icfre.org
RI Pandey, Shailesh/AAX-9993-2020; null, Dr Rama Kant/KEI-8262-2024
OI Dabral, Aman/0000-0003-0662-9953; Bhandari, Maneesh
   Singh/0000-0002-7069-7048
FU Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education (ICFRE), Dehradun
   under the project; Department of Science and Technology (DST),
   Government of India (GoI), New Delhi [10-1/2017-2018/Budget]; 
   [ITS/2023/000752]
FX Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education (ICFRE), Dehradun
   under the project grant No. 10-1/2017-2018/Budget & Audit (Part-IInd);
   dated 04th July, 2017. Travel support to attend the IFURO Division 5
   Conference (June 4-8, 2023), Cairns, Australia, by the Science and
   Engineering Research Board (Statutory Body Established Through an Act of
   Parliament: SERB Act 2008), Department of Science and Technology (DST),
   Government of India (GoI), New Delhi, vide File No. ITS/2023/000752,
   dated 21/04/2023.
CR Ahmed N, 2022, GENET RESOUR CROP EV, V69, P2425, DOI 10.1007/s10722-022-01381-y
   Bhandari MS, 2020, MOL BIOL REP, V47, P6997, DOI 10.1007/s11033-020-05758-z
   BOTSTEIN D, 1980, AM J HUM GENET, V32, P314
   Vieira MLC, 2016, GENET MOL BIOL, V39, P312, DOI 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0027
   Chakraborty D, 2016, EUR J FOREST RES, V135, P919, DOI 10.1007/s10342-016-0984-5
   Chen SY, 2020, FORESTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/f11020203
   Colburn BC, 2017, MOL BREEDING, V37, DOI 10.1007/s11032-016-0616-2
   da Paschoa RP, 2018, ACTA BOT BRAS, V32, P376
   Dabral A, 2021, PHYSIOL MOL BIOL PLA, V27, P1623, DOI 10.1007/s12298-021-01035-w
   de Araújo AM, 2006, GENET MOL BIOL, V29, P67, DOI 10.1590/S1415-47572006000100014
   Delnevo N, 2019, APPL PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.1002/aps3.11283
   Devraj P., 1999, MONOGRAPH SILVEROAK
   Doyle J., 1990, Focus, V12, P13
   Dunphy BK, 2005, HEREDITY, V94, P418, DOI 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800622
   Eizaguirre C, 2014, EVOL APPL, V7, P963, DOI 10.1111/eva.12227
   England PR, 2002, MOL ECOL, V11, P967, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01500.x
   Evanno G, 2005, MOL ECOL, V14, P2611, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
   EXCOFFIER L, 1992, GENETICS, V131, P479
   Falush D, 2007, MOL ECOL NOTES, V7, P574, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01758.x
   Frankham R., 2002, INTRO CONSERVATION G
   FSI (Forest Survey of India), 2010, MANUAL NATL FOREST I
   Govindaraj M, 2015, GENET RES INT, V2015, DOI 10.1155/2015/431487
   Grattapaglia D, 2000, FOR SCI, V64, P451
   Gross CL, 2012, ANN BOT-LONDON, V109, P331, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcr283
   Guo Q, 2022, J FORESTRY RES, V33, P611, DOI 10.1007/s11676-021-01356-2
   Harwood C., 1992, PROC INT WORKSHOP GR, P9
   Harwood C.E., 1989, GREVILLEA ROBUSTA AN, P124
   Harwood CE, 1997, AUST J BOT, V45, P669, DOI 10.1071/BT96073
   Hevroy TH, 2013, CONSERV GENET RESOUR, V5, P887, DOI 10.1007/s12686-013-9918-4
   Hoebee SE, 2001, HEREDITY, V86, P489, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00857.x
   Hogbin PM, 1998, HEREDITY, V80, P180, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00271.x
   Holmes GD, 2009, CONSERV GENET, V10, P827, DOI 10.1007/s10592-008-9643-9
   Isaac-Renton MG, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P2607, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12604
   James EA, 2012, CONSERV GENET RESOUR, V4, P137, DOI 10.1007/s12686-011-9493-5
   Kalinganire A, 2000, ANN BOT-LONDON, V86, P133, DOI 10.1006/anbo.2000.1170
   Kalinganire A, 2001, AUSTRAL ECOL, V26, P637, DOI 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2001.01139.x
   KALINGANIRE A, 1993, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V62, P73, DOI 10.1016/0378-1127(93)90042-L
   Kordrostami M., 2015, MOL MARKERS PLANTS C, V13, P4024
   Kumar S, 2001, CAN J FOREST RES, V31, P779, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-31-5-779
   Li DJ, 2012, BMC GENOMICS, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-192
   Liu KJ, 2005, BIOINFORMATICS, V21, P2128, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti282
   Llorens TM, 2004, HEREDITY, V92, P519, DOI 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800444
   Lv JB, 2020, IND CROP PROD, V145, DOI 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112157
   Macmillan H.F., 1956, TROPICAL PLANTING GA
   Madadi LM, 2009, SOUTH FORESTS, V71, P201, DOI 10.2989/SF.2009.71.3.4.916
   Maliondo S. M. S., 1998, Southern African Forestry Journal, V0, P66
   Matschiner M, 2009, BIOINFORMATICS, V25, P1982, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp303
   Mir RR, 2021, FRONT GENET, V11, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2020.609603
   Mishra G, 2023, FUNCT INTEGR GENOMIC, V23, DOI 10.1007/s10142-023-00975-8
   Monfared Mohammad Asadi, 2018, Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, V16, P661, DOI 10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.04.005
   Mugunga C.P., 2009, RMJ, V17, P130
   Mulualem Tewodros, 2018, Australian Journal of Crop Science, V12, P1223, DOI 10.21475/ajcs.18.12.08.PNE885
   Nadeem MA, 2018, BIOTECHNOL BIOTEC EQ, V32, P261, DOI 10.1080/13102818.2017.1400401
   NEI M, 1974, GENETICS, V76, P379
   Nevill PG, 2020, PLANT METHODS, V16, DOI 10.1186/s13007-019-0534-5
   Nock CJ, 2016, BMC GENOMICS, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-3272-3
   Peakall R, 2012, BIOINFORMATICS, V28, P2537, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460
   Peleg Z, 2008, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V31, P39, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01731.x
   Porth I., 2014, Diversity, V6, P283, DOI 10.3390/d6020283
   Sheriff O, 2018, COGENT FOOD AGR, V4, DOI 10.1080/23311932.2018.1459062
   Shete S, 2000, THEOR POPUL BIOL, V57, P265, DOI 10.1006/tpbi.2000.1452
   Shimizu JY, 2002, INT FOREST REV, V4, P128, DOI 10.1505/IFOR.4.2.128.17444
   Sousa V.A.D., 2018, REV ARVORE, V42
   Stanton BJ, 2010, PLANT GENET GENOMICS, V8, P309, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-1541-2_14
   Starr GJ, 1998, AUST J BOT, V46, P671, DOI 10.1071/BT97123
   Stingemore JA, 2013, APPL PLANT SCI, V1, DOI 10.3732/apps.1300023
   Thomas A. S., 1941, East African Agricultural Journal, V7, P24
   Van Oosterhout C, 2004, MOL ECOL NOTES, V4, P535, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x
   Vats G, 2023, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/agriculture13020431
   Watt G., 1883, EC PRODUCTS INDIA, VVol. 1
   Xia Y, 2018, BMC GENOMICS, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12864-018-5329-y
   Xue L, 2018, TREE GENET GENOMES, V14, DOI 10.1007/s11295-018-1255-z
   Yeh F.C., 1999, POPGENE VER 132 32 B
NR 73
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 1
U2 2
PU OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
PI CARY
PA JOURNALS DEPT, 2001 EVANS RD, CARY, NC 27513 USA
SN 0015-749X
EI 1938-3738
J9 FOREST SCI
JI For. Sci.
PD APR 2
PY 2024
VL 70
IS 2
BP 132
EP 143
DI 10.1093/forsci/fxae003
EA FEB 2024
PG 12
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA MP9J2
UT WOS:001160173000001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Zare, M
   Azam, S
   Sauchyn, D
AF Zare, Mohammad
   Azam, Shahid
   Sauchyn, David
TI Simulation of Climate Change Impacts on Crop Yield in the Saskatchewan
   Grain Belt Using an Improved SWAT Model
SO AGRICULTURE-BASEL
LA English
DT Article
DE crop yield; climate change; weather extreme; SWAT-M; southern
   Saskatchewan
ID DANUBE RIVER-BASIN; WATER-QUALITY; CO2 CONCENTRATION; EXTREMES INDEXES;
   SOIL; CALIBRATION; SCALE; VARIABILITY; HYDROLOGY; RESPONSES
AB Climate change has a potentially significant influence on agricultural production in southern Saskatchewan. Crop yields are susceptible to weather patterns and seasonal fluctuations in this sub-humid region owing to the predominance of rain-fed farming practices. A modified Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT-M) and the output from 10 high-resolution (0.22 degrees) regional climate models (RCMs) were used to develop simulations of spring wheat and rain-fed canola in 296 rural municipalities (RM) for a historical baseline period (1975-2004) and three 30-year future periods: near (2010-2039), middle (2040-2069), and far (2070-2099). We combined SWAT-M with the S-curve method to adjust yield to the original drought stress in the source code and evaluated eight indices of extreme precipitation and temperature. Results of calibration and validation suggest that the simulated crop yields generally agree with observed data. Crop yield showed lesser performance compared with streamflow and soil water content (SWC) along with percent bias, ranging from -9.6% to -14.8%, while streamflow calibration ranges from -5.3% to -7.7%. The multi-model ensemble median showed increasing radiative forcing in the temperature and precipitation indices, such that the RCM-projected weather indices were found to be warmer and wetter than those estimated using regional historical data. The results of simulating canola and spring wheat indicate an increase in crop yield of 17% and 9.7% in the near future, 28.2% and 15.6% in the middle future, and 44.7% and 32% in the far future, respectively. Although, there has been an increase in the median wheat and canola yields, a significant reduction in the annual production is observed. This decline in yield amounts to around 1000 kg/ha and is anticipated to occur in the near and middle future. This trend is quite pronounced in the extreme south and southwest regions. Overall, this innovative research framework, along with the region-specific model outcomes in the form of crop yield projections, will aid in the formulation of future agricultural policies aimed at promoting effective climate adaptation strategies.
C1 [Zare, Mohammad; Sauchyn, David] Univ Regina, Prairie Adaptat Res Collaborat, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.
   [Azam, Shahid] Univ Regina, Environm Syst Engn, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.
C3 University of Regina; University of Regina
RP Azam, S (corresponding author), Univ Regina, Environm Syst Engn, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.
EM mohammad.zare@uregina.ca; shahid.azam@uregina.ca;
   david.sauchyn@uregina.ca
RI Zare, Mohammad/E-7115-2017
OI Azam, Shahid/0000-0002-8531-2577; Sauchyn, David/0000-0003-1607-2028
FU Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
FX The authors would like to thank the University of Regina for providing
   laboratory space.
CR Abbaspour KC, 2015, J HYDROL, V524, P733, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.027
   Abbaspour KC, 2007, J HYDROL, V333, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.014
   [Anonymous], 2016, Total Area of Farms and Use of Farm Land, Historical Data
   Arnold JG, 2012, T ASABE, V55, P1491
   Arnold JG, 1998, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V34, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
   Barros V, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, pIX
   Bauwe A., 2019, Advances in Geosciences, V48, P1, DOI DOI 10.5194/ADGEO-48-1-2019
   Bradshaw B, 2004, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V67, P119, DOI 10.1007/s10584-004-0710-z
   Chen Y, 2021, AGR WATER MANAGE, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106574
   Ficklin DL, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P5079, DOI 10.1002/2016GL069121
   FIELD CB, 1995, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V18, P1214, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00630.x
   Government of Saskatchewan, 2015, Saskatchewan Agricultural Exports
   Havrylenko SB, 2016, CATENA, V137, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2015.10.001
   He W, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0207370
   Hu X, 2007, J ENVIRON QUAL, V36, P996, DOI 10.2134/jeq2006.0228
   Kang XY, 2022, AGR WATER MANAGE, V269, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107680
   Karl TR, 1999, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V42, P3, DOI 10.1023/A:1005491526870
   Kerr SA, 2019, LAND-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/land8030049
   Kiktev D, 2003, J CLIMATE, V16, P3560, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<3560:COMAOT>2.0.CO;2
   Ko JH, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V111, P445, DOI [10.1007/s10584-011-0175-9, 10.1007/S10584-011-0175-9]
   Kozak JA, 2006, AGRON J, V98, P1146, DOI 10.2134/agronj2005.0303
   Leakey ADB, 2009, J EXP BOT, V60, P2859, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erp096
   Legates DR, 1999, WATER RESOUR RES, V35, P233, DOI 10.1029/1998WR900018
   Liu W., 2019, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss, P1, DOI [DOI 10.5194/HESS-2019-232, 10.5194/hess-2019-232]
   Malagó A, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V603, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.242
   Mearns L. O., 2017, NCAR CLIMATE DATA GA, V10, DOI 10.5065/D6SJ1JCH
   Meaurio M, 2015, J HYDROL, V525, P326, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.050
   Medlyn BE, 2001, NEW PHYTOL, V149, P247, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00028.x
   Mekonnen BA, 2016, HYDROL PROCESS, V30, P2373, DOI 10.1002/hyp.10800
   Min SK, 2011, NATURE, V470, P378, DOI 10.1038/nature09763
   Mittelstet AR, 2015, INT J AGR BIOL ENG, V8, P110, DOI 10.3965/j.ijabe.20150803.950
   MONTEITH JL, 1977, PHILOS T R SOC B, V281, P277, DOI 10.1098/rstb.1977.0140
   Moriasi DN, 2007, T ASABE, V50, P885, DOI 10.13031/2013.23153
   Moss RH, 2010, NATURE, V463, P747, DOI 10.1038/nature08823
   Musyoka FK, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13162238
   Nair SS, 2011, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V47, P1285, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00570.x
   Nash JE., 1970, Journal of Hydrology, V10, P282, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6]
   Neitsch S, 2011, SOIL WATER ASSESSMEN
   Perez-Valdivia C, 2017, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V14, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.10.004
   Pomeroy J., 2009, Impacts of Climate Change on Saskatchewan's Water Resources
   Qi JY, 2019, J HYDROL, V571, P605, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.02.020
   Qian BD, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab88fc
   Qian BD, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab17fb
   Qian BD, 2016, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V123, P651, DOI 10.1007/s00704-015-1378-1
   Rahman KU, 2022, APPL WATER SCI, V12, DOI 10.1007/s13201-022-01692-6
   Rajib MA, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V75, P498, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.032
   Saxe H, 1998, NEW PHYTOL, V139, P395, DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00221.x
   Shahvari N, 2019, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V191, DOI 10.1007/s10661-019-7266-x
   Sillmann J, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V118, P1716, DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50203
   Sillmann J, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V118, P2473, DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50188
   Sinnathamby S, 2017, AGR WATER MANAGE, V180, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.10.024
   Smith WN, 2013, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V179, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2013.08.015
   Sreeharsha RV, 2015, PLANT SCI, V231, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.11.012
   Srinivasan R, 2010, T ASABE, V53, P1533
   Sun C, 2014, HYDROL PROCESS, V28, P2478, DOI 10.1002/hyp.9759
   Thomson AM, 2005, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V69, P43, DOI 10.1007/s10584-005-3612-9
   Uniyal B, 2017, AGR WATER MANAGE, V193, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.08.002
   van Vuuren DP, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P5, DOI [10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z, 10.1007/s10584-011-0157-y]
   Vigiak O, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V599, P992, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.236
   Vincent LA, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V117, DOI 10.1029/2012JD017859
   Wand SJE, 1999, GLOB CHANGE BIOL, V5, P723, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00265.x
   Wang RY, 2016, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V216, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.10.001
   WILLIAMS JR, 1990, PHILOS T R SOC B, V329, P421, DOI 10.1098/rstb.1990.0184
   Xie XH, 2011, J HYDROL, V396, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.032
   Xu ZZ, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00657
   Yesuf HM, 2015, CATENA, V127, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2014.12.032
   Zare M, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141710804
   Zare M, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14020249
   Zhang J, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V206, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.179
NR 69
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 3
U2 6
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2077-0472
J9 AGRICULTURE-BASEL
JI Agriculture-Basel
PD NOV
PY 2023
VL 13
IS 11
AR 2102
DI 10.3390/agriculture13112102
PG 21
WC Agronomy
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Agriculture
GA Y8OT2
UT WOS:001107806300001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Juma, LA
   Nkongolo, NV
   Raude, JM
   Kiai, C
AF Juma, Lilian A.
   Nkongolo, Nsalambi, V
   Raude, James M.
   Kiai, Caroline
TI Assessment of hydrological water balance in Lower Nzoia Sub-catchment
   using SWAT-model: towards improved water governace in Kenya
SO HELIYON
LA English
DT Article
DE Accuracy assessment; Water balance; Water availability; Land use; land
   cover; Adaptive capacity; Lower Nzoia sub-catchment
ID COVER CHANGE; FRAMEWORK
AB Kenya's catchments has both natural and disturbed environments. Within these environments, there has been interaction between hydrological, physical and ecological characteristics. Therefore, impacts of Land Use Land Cover (LULC) change on surface and sub - surface hydrology needs to be well understood due to the increasing population competing for scarce natural resources such as water, trees and forest land. The water balance com-ponents' spatial and temporal dynamics in relationship to the LULC change between 2003 and 2018 in the Lower Nzoia Sub - Catchment (LNSC) in Kenya was therefore assessed. Landsat data with 30 m (m) spatial resolution was used in understanding LULC dynamics of the study area using Supervised Classification Approach (Interactive Classification Method) in ArcGIS 10.5. After landsat image classification, key water balance components including; surface runoff (SURFQ), lateral flow (LATQ), groundwater recharge (BASEQ), deep acquifer recharge (DEEPQ), evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater revap (REVAP) for years 2003 and 2018 were estimated using SWAT model in ArcSWAT. The overall accuracies for 2003 and 2018 classified images were 75.9% and 98.9% respectively which are showing good values. The results of the study showed that agricultural land coverage reduced from 83.1% in 2003 to 78.6% in 2018. Rangeland on the hand increased from 6.3% to 9.8% while urban/built - up area increasing from 10.6% to 11.6%. The annual water balance components from the LULC distribution of the two time periods shows that ET reduced, SURFQ increased, BASEQ reduced, DEEPQ reduced, LATQ reduced and REVAP reduced. At catchment level, results show that 2018 had a higher water balance than 2003 which can partly be explained by land cover decrease. The relationship between rainfall distribution, Land Surface Temperature (LST) and LULC change were further compared. At the same time, the study found out that there is limited focus to date on rural communities climate adaptive capacity. Hence, water institutions in the sub - catchment such as Water Resources Authority (WRA) are yet to fully mainstream adaptive capacity into their organizational structure and policies.
C1 [Juma, Lilian A.] Pan African Univ, Water Policy Master Grad, Inst Water & Energy Sci including Climate Change, Tilimsen, Algeria.
   [Nkongolo, Nsalambi, V] Navajo Tech Univ, Sch Sci, Crownpoint, NM USA.
   [Raude, James M.; Kiai, Caroline] Jomo Kenyatta Univ Agr & Technol, Soil Water & Environm Engn Dept, Nairobi, Kenya.
C3 Navajo Technical University; Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture &
   Technology
RP Juma, LA (corresponding author), Pan African Univ, Water Policy Master Grad, Inst Water & Energy Sci including Climate Change, Tilimsen, Algeria.
EM lillianjuma@hotmail.com
RI Nkongolo, Nsalambi/A-5165-2012
OI Nkongolo, Nsalambi/0000-0003-2485-4759; Juma,
   Lilian/0000-0001-6014-3044; Raude, James/0000-0002-2690-3852
FU African Union Commission; Pan African University Institute of Water and
   Energy Sciences including Climate Change in Algeria
FX This work was supported by African Union Commission research grant for
   the Master Thesis at Pan African University Institute of Water and
   Energy Sciences including Climate Change in Algeria for the rersearch
   work of Lilian Adhiambo Juma.
CR Adhikari P., 2013, British Journal of Environment and Climate Change, V3, P67
   Akali N., 2015, GLOB J ENG SCI RES M
   [Anonymous], 2011, 406 WAT RES I
   Arnold JG, 1998, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V34, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
   Bao Z.., 2012, J HYDROL
   Barbara A.C., 2018, ECOL SOC
   Bergkamp G., 2003, CHANGE ADAPTATION WA
   Campbell D.J., 2003, LAND USE CHANGE IMPA
   Cao WZ, 2009, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V23, P137, DOI 10.1007/s11269-008-9268-2
   Chemura A., 2020, REM SENS APPL SOC EN
   Cinner JE, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P117, DOI 10.1038/s41558-017-0065-x
   Duveiller G, 2018, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V10, P1265, DOI 10.5194/essd-10-1265-2018
   Githui F.W., 2022, LAKE VICTORIA BASIN
   Gupta HV, 1999, J HYDROL ENG, V4, P135, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:2(135)
   Horning N., 2004, Land cover classification methods
   HWSD, 2009, HARM WORLD SOIL DAT
   Jensen J. R., 1996, Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective.
   Kodiaga T., 2013, KENYA LOWER NZOIA IR, V2
   Ligtenberg J., 2017, THEORETICAL GEOECOLO
   Lillesand TM., 2004, Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, V5
   Loucks D.P., 2017, Water Resources Planning and Management An Introduction to Methods, Models, and Application
   Maingi J., 2001, INT J REM SENS, V23
   Memarian H, 2014, HYDROLOG SCI J, V59, P1808, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2014.892598
   Moriasi DN, 2007, T ASABE, V50, P885, DOI 10.13031/2013.23153
   Musau J, 2015, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V3, P233, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.12.001
   Mwangi H.M., 2016, IMPACT LAND USE CHAN
   Nash JE., 1970, Journal of Hydrology, V10, P282, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6]
   Ngaina J., 2017, HYDROL CURR RES
   Odada EO, 2004, AMBIO, V33, P13, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2004)033[0013:MOEPIL]2.0.CO;2
   Odira P.M., 2010, NILE BASIN WATER SCI
   Odongo VO, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V682, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.062
   Ostrom E, 2009, SCIENCE, V325, P419, DOI 10.1126/science.1172133
   routetofood, ROUTE FOOD 202112 31
   Rwanga S. S., 2017, International Journal of Geosciences, V8, P611, DOI 10.4236/ijg.2017.84033
   Sharma N.K., 2019, INT J INNOVATIVE TEC
   Sutcliffe J.V., 2004, Hydrology: a question of balance
   UN, 2018, SDG6 Synthesis Report 2018, DOI [10.1126/science.278.5339.827, DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.278.5339.827]
   UNEP, 2012, REPORT WORKING GROUP
   Van Liew MW, 2003, T ASAE, V46, P1539, DOI 10.13031/2013.15643
   Viessman W., 2003, INTRO HYDROLOGY, V5th
   Vörösmarty CJ, 2015, SCIENCE, V349, P478, DOI 10.1126/science.aac6009
   Waithaka A., 2020, APPL ECOL ENV SCI, V8
   Wang H, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P1929, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-1929-2017
   Young T.P., 2005, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V32
NR 44
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 2
U2 12
PU CELL PRESS
PI CAMBRIDGE
PA 50 HAMPSHIRE ST, FLOOR 5, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139 USA
EI 2405-8440
J9 HELIYON
JI Heliyon
PD JUL
PY 2022
VL 8
IS 7
AR e09799
DI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09799
EA JUL 2022
PG 12
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA 3Y1UU
UT WOS:000843515600003
PM 35855988
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Li, H
   Hou, EK
   Deng, JW
AF Li, Hui
   Hou, Enke
   Deng, Jiawei
TI Spatio-Temporal Differentiation Characteristic and Evolution Process of
   Meteorological Drought in Northwest China From 1960 to 2018
SO FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE meteorological drought; Run Theory; differentiation characteristic;
   spatial similarity; evolution process; Northwest China
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; RIVER-BASIN; ARID REGION; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; TRENDS;
   INDEX; VARIABILITY; FREQUENCY; SEVERITY; RAINFALL
AB Against the backdrop of global climate change, the response characteristic of meteorological drought is of great concern, especially in the arid or semi-arid regions. By employing the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), TPFW-MK test, Run Theory, Moran's I, and General G, the spatio-temporal evolution characteristic of drought was clarified and the spatial autocorrelation of local and global drought characteristic variables was explored based on the meteorological data from 122 stations in Northwest China (NWC) during 1960-2018. The results indicated that the drought situation of NWC was improving regardless of annual or seasonal scale. According to the Z-statistics by the TPFW- MK test, there existed an obvious wet trend in west NWC and a slight dry trend in east NWC. The center of gravity migration model revealed that the gravity center of SPI moved towards higher latitude over the last decades, there was a northwest (1960-1990) and northeast (1990-2018) variation in the covering shapes of the standard deviational ellipses of SPI, and the spatial distribution of SPI tended to be concentrated. Meanwhile, the distribution pattern of drought characteristics suggested that more droughts occurred in east of NWC, which were less harmful while fewer droughts happened in west NWC, which brought greater drought damage. The results of global Moran's I (GMI) indicated that both annual and seasonal drought variables were characterized with significant spatial autocorrelation, the spatial distribution of winter drought variables was more disperse than other seasons, while the damage of summer and autumn drought was bigger than that in spring and winter. Besides, the results of local Moran's I (LMI) showed that there was obvious agglomeration in the overall distribution of drought characteristic variables, which had a seesaw effect. The spatial distribution of hot spots and cold spots at different confidence levels indicated that Shaanxi Province experienced the most droughts but with shortest duration and lowest severity while northwest Xinjiang had the fewest droughts with longest duration and highest severity. The results of revealing the drought development process and identifying the location of drought aggregation will provide references for supporting climate adaptation strategies and preventing droughtrelated loss.
C1 [Li, Hui; Hou, Enke; Deng, Jiawei] Xian Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Geol & Environm, Xian, Peoples R China.
C3 Xi'an University of Science & Technology
RP Li, H (corresponding author), Xian Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Geol & Environm, Xian, Peoples R China.
EM lihui@xust.edu.cn
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [42007186]
FX This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (No. 42007186).
CR Amirataee B, 2020, HYDROL PROCESS, V34, P4067, DOI 10.1002/hyp.13866
   Ayantobo OO, 2017, J HYDROL, V550, P549, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.019
   Azimi S, 2020, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V34, P4703, DOI 10.1007/s11269-020-02683-5
   Beguería S, 2014, INT J CLIMATOL, V34, P3001, DOI 10.1002/joc.3887
   Bonaccorso B, 2015, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V29, P459, DOI 10.1007/s11269-014-0673-4
   Brito SSB, 2018, INT J CLIMATOL, V38, P517, DOI 10.1002/joc.5225
   Burke EJ, 2010, J HYDROL, V388, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.04.035
   Campozano L, 2020, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V8, DOI 10.3389/feart.2020.00017
   Cao D, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P11138, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2963458
   Chen HP, 2015, J CLIMATE, V28, P5430, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00707.1
   Chen YG, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0249589
   Chen YD, 2016, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V30, P2031, DOI 10.1007/s00477-015-1174-6
   China P.R., 2015, CHIN STAT YB 2014
   Deng SL, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V619, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.339
   Dinpashoh Y, 2011, J HYDROL, V399, P422, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.021
   Fung KF, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P2071, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04072-y
   Gocic M, 2013, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V100, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.10.014
   Gu L, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10111702
   Guo H, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V624, P1523, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.120
   Haroon MA, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V84, P1349, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2490-y
   Hu ZY, 2021, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3389/feart.2021.654848
   Hu ZY, 2019, INT J CLIMATOL, V39, P1072, DOI 10.1002/joc.5863
   Huang JP, 2019, ADV ATMOS SCI, V36, P922, DOI 10.1007/s00376-018-8200-9
   Huang J, 2013, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V114, P237, DOI 10.1007/s00704-013-0831-2
   Huang SZ, 2015, J HYDROL, V530, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.042
   Jhajharia D, 2012, HYDROL PROCESS, V26, P421, DOI 10.1002/hyp.8140
   Ji F, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P462, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2223, 10.1038/nclimate2223]
   Kalisa W, 2020, AGR WATER MANAGE, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106195
   Leng XX, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V102, P307, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-03928-7
   Li H, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V109, P2173, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04915-2
   Li SY, 2020, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V11, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2020.09.003
   Lin ZH, 2020, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V8, DOI 10.3389/feart.2020.00306
   Liu ZP, 2016, J HYDROL, V534, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.003
   Liu ZY, 2016, INT J CLIMATOL, V36, P2886, DOI 10.1002/joc.4526
   Machiwal D, 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P2719, DOI 10.1002/joc.4875
   Ministry of Water Resources P.R. China (MWR), 2015, B FLOOD DROUGHT DIS
   Mishra AK, 2015, J HYDROL, V526, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.054
   [莫兴国 Mo Xingguo], 2018, [自然资源学报, Journal of Natural Resources], V33, P1244
   Mondal A, 2015, ADV WATER RESOUR, V75, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.11.005
   Montaseri M, 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P998, DOI 10.1002/joc.4755
   Naumann G, 2018, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V45, P3285, DOI 10.1002/2017GL076521
   Naumann G, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124013
   Ogunrinde AT, 2021, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V143, P843, DOI 10.1007/s00704-020-03453-4
   Oikonomou PD, 2020, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V34, P4757, DOI 10.1007/s11269-020-02688-0
   Raziei T, 2015, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V29, P487, DOI 10.1007/s11269-014-0690-3
   Shi P, 2015, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V29, P3941, DOI 10.1007/s11269-015-1038-3
   Spinoni J, 2019, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V22, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100593
   Sternberg T, 2018, LAND-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/land7010022
   Sun FY, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V696, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134076
   Tirivarombo S, 2018, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V106, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2018.07.001
   Udmale P, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V10, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.09.011
   Wang H, 2016, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V75, DOI 10.1007/s12665-016-5656-8
   Wang YJ, 2017, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V8, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2017.08.004
   Wang ZL, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V579, P314, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.098
   Wei W, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P51556, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-14122-y
   Wu JF, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V765, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144232
   Xu K, 2015, J HYDROL, V527, P630, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.030
   [杨思遥 Yang Siyao], 2018, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V38, P1028
   Yang X, 2018, J HYDROMETEOROL, V19, P609, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-17-0180.1
   Yuan QZ, 2017, SCI CHINA EARTH SCI, V60, P2041, DOI 10.1007/s11430-017-9097-1
   Yue S, 2002, HYDROL PROCESS, V16, P1807, DOI 10.1002/hyp.1095
   Yusof F, 2013, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V27, P4183, DOI 10.1007/s11269-013-0402-4
NR 62
TC 11
Z9 12
U1 4
U2 63
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-6463
J9 FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ
JI Front. Earth Sci.
PD MAR 24
PY 2022
VL 10
AR 857953
DI 10.3389/feart.2022.857953
PG 18
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology
GA 1T0FV
UT WOS:000804416800001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Quang, NM
AF Quang, N. M.
TI A method for measuring women climate vulnerability: a case study in
   Vietnam's Mekong Delta
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATE CHANGE STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Women climate vulnerability; Climate risk assessment; Mekong Delta;
   Gender inequality; Women adaptive capacity; Climate adaptation
ID GENDER; IMPACTS; WATER
AB Purpose Across societies, gendered climate response decisions remain top-down and have limited progress because the influenced risk dynamics and their interrelations are not adequately understood. This study aims to address this gap by proposing an interdisciplinary innovative method, called women climate vulnerability (WCV) index, for measuring and comparing a diverse range of risks that threaten to undermine the adaptive capacity and resilience of rural women. Design/methodology/approach This paper builds on the literature to identify 12 risk categories across physical, economic and political sectors that affect rural women. These categories and attendant 51 risk indicators form the WCV index. A case study in Ben Tre Province (Vietnam) was used to demonstrate the application of the WCV methodology to rural contexts. The authors combined empirical, survey and secondary data from different sources to form data on the indicators. Structured expert judgment was used to address data gaps. Empirical and expert data were combined using a few weighting steps and a comprehensive coding system was developed to ensure objective evaluation. Findings The WCV assessment results reveal a reasonably worrisome picture of women's vulnerability in Ben Tre as top highest-likelihood and deepest-impact risks predominate in physical and economic risk sectors. Stability, human security and governance categories have lowest scores, demonstrating a fairly politically favourable condition in the province. The medium risk scores captured in land and infrastructure categories reveal promising determinants of the adaptation of women in this rural province. The results demonstrate the usefulness of the WCV index in collecting bottom-up data, evaluating a wide variety of risks that rural women face and pinpointing priority areas that need to be addressed. Originality/value The WCV is systematic, customisable and localised. It combines field research and empirical data through structured expert judgment, thus enables researchers to fill data gaps and to do evidence-based assessment about diverse risk vulnerabilities. By doing so, the WCV index gives critical insights into the challenges that rural women face. This enables local governments to better understand cross-sectoral risks, pinpoint priority areas of action and timely channel funding and policy resources to support women where they need it most.
C1 [Quang, N. M.] Can Tho Univ, Can Tho, Vietnam.
C3 Can Tho University
RP Quang, NM (corresponding author), Can Tho Univ, Can Tho, Vietnam.
EM nmquang@ctu.edu.vn
OI Nguyen, Quang/0000-0002-6786-2065
FU East-West Management Institute (EWMI) through Open Development
   Initiative (ODV) [1747-20-100-7202-20]; EWMI; Open Development Vietnam
FX This paper is part of the research grant # 1747-20-100-7202-20 funded by
   the East-West Management Institute (EWMI) through Open Development
   Initiative (ODV). The authors would like to express their sincere thanks
   to EWMI, Ms Pyrou Chung (ODV Director), Ms Nga Nguyen and Ms Hoang Anh
   (Open Development Vietnam) for their generous support and technical
   assistance related to data collection and virtualisation during the
   course of the project. Special thanks go to women respondents and local
   government officials in Ben Tre Province, who spent their valuable time
   for the interviews and provided data without which this research has
   little to rest on. The authors are grateful to the following citizen
   scientists from Can Tho University and Mekong Environment Forum who have
   overcome the challenges from pandemic to complete fieldwork and data
   collection in the research site: Ho Thi Thu Ho, Le Van Hieu, Huynh Hoang
   Kha, Le Thanh Nghe, Trinh Chi Tham, Phan Hoang Linh, Tran Thi Minh Tho,
   Nguyen Hoai Phong, Tran Thi Diem Suong, Nguyen Thi Anh Tuyet, Nguyen Van
   The, Duong Quoc Bao, Nguyen Thi My Yen and Thai Kim Nhi. This research
   is initially inspired by the research work of Gupta et al. (2007), Dube
   (2014) and Stuart et al. (2020). The author is indebted to their
   literary contributions and other authors and organisations whose
   publications were cited in this work. Finally, the authors want to thank
   Wesley Grover (MEF copyeditor) for casting his experienced eyes over
   sections of the paper.
CR Andrijevic M, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-19856-w
   [Anonymous], 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P255, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0448-2
   [Anonymous], 2019, COMPUT FRAUD SECUR, P4
   [Anonymous], 2016, CLIMATE CHANGE INDIC
   [Anonymous], 2008, 1 ICEM
   [Anonymous], 2020, VIETNAM NEWS AGENCY
   Arekapudi N., 2020, WORLD BANK BLOGS
   Asian Development Bank, 2017, CLIM CHANG ASS CLIM
   Balabanova ES., 2007, SOCIOLOGICAL RES, V46, P5
   Banerjee S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V157, P587, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02572-w
   Ben Tre People's Committee, 2021, DEC NO 301QD UBND DA
   Binh, 2018, MEKONG EYE
   Boetto H, 2013, AUST SOC WORK, V66, P234, DOI 10.1080/0312407X.2013.780630
   Chanana-Nag N, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V158, P13, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2233-z
   Chant S, 1997, IDS BULL-I DEV STUD, V28, P26, DOI 10.1111/j.1759-5436.1997.mp28003003.x
   Connor J, 2020, SOC SCI MED, V266, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113364
   de Wit J., 2019, URBAN POVERTY LOCAL
   Denton F., 2002, Gender and Development, V10, P10, DOI 10.1080/13552070215903
   Di Cesare Mariachiara, 2014, Genus, V70, P1
   Djoudi H, 2016, AMBIO, V45, pS248, DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0825-2
   Dube S., 2014, SUPPORT WOMEN BUILD
   Fairbairn J, 2020, SOCIETIES, V10, DOI 10.3390/soc10030051
   FAO, 2017, The Role of Gender in Climate-Smart Agriculture. Module C-6 in Climate-Smart Agriculture Sourcebook
   Figueiredo P, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V60, P188, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.025
   Fortnam M, 2019, ECOL ECON, V159, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.018
   Fritsche I, 2012, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V32, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.10.002
   *Gerrard M., 2016, CLIMATE CHANGE HUMAN
   Gevers A., 2020, UNDP BLOG
   Glazebrook T, 2011, HYPATIA, V26, P762, DOI 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01212.x
   Grabe S, 2015, PSYCHOL WOMEN QUART, V39, P7, DOI 10.1177/0361684314533485
   Gupta J., 2007, Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, V4, P139, DOI DOI 10.1080/15693430701742677
   Habtezion S, 2013, Overview of linkages between gender and climate change. Gender and Climate Change: Asia and the Pacific, Policy Brief 1, P20
   Howard G, 2016, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V41, P253, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085856
   Indrawati, 2015, WORLD BANK BLOGS
   International Organization for Migration, 2017, CLIMATE CHANGE HUMAN
   IPCC, 2014, ASS MAN RISKS CLIM
   IUCN, 2015, Gender and climate change, issues brief
   Kristjanson P., 2019, WORLD BANK BLOGS
   Lama P, 2021, CLIM DEV, V13, P326, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2020.1772708
   Landis WG, 2013, ENVIRON TOXICOL CHEM, V32, P79, DOI 10.1002/etc.2047
   Least Developed Countries Expert Group, 2015, Strengthening gender considerations in adaptation planning and implementation in the least developed countries Internet
   Leonard M., 1998, INVISIBLE WORK INVIS, P113
   Madra-Sawicka M, 2020, INFORMATION, V11, DOI 10.3390/info11040225
   Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, 2018, BEN 3 LAND DISP STIL
   Mlambo C, 2019, COGENT SOC SCI, V5, DOI 10.1080/23311886.2019.1681048
   Momtaz S., 2020, CLIMATE CHANGE IMPAC
   Muthien Bernedette., 2000, Agenda, V43, P46
   Nasiritousi N, 2016, INT ENVIRON AGREEM-P, V16, P109, DOI 10.1007/s10784-014-9243-8
   Nyirongo V., 2019, UN CHRONICLE
   OECD, 2013, WOM FIN LIT
   Povall SL, 2014, HEALTH PROMOT INT, V29, P621, DOI 10.1093/heapro/dat012
   Quang N.M., 2021, VIETNAM J SCI TECHNO, V745, P11
   Quang N.M., 2020, VIETNAM J SCI TECHNO, V744, P48
   Resurrección BP, 2013, WOMEN STUD INT FORUM, V40, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.wsif.2013.03.011
   Smit B, 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P877
   Sofuoglu E, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P14033, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-07937-8
   Stuart Jack., 2020, The Climate and Ocean Risk Vulnerability Index
   Tschakert P, 2012, GEOGR TIDSSKR-DEN, V112, P144, DOI 10.1080/00167223.2012.741889
   UN, 2018, GEND EQ LAND RIGHTS
   UN Human Rights, 2012, WOM RIGHT AD HOUS
   UN Population Fund, 2009, OV WOM FOR
   UN Water, 2010, CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPT
   UN Women, 2020, DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY C
   UN Women Watch, 2022, WOM GEND EQ CLIM CHA
   UNFCCC, 2017, Gender and Climate Change: Compilation of Decisions, Subsidiary Body Reports Related to Gender and Climate Change
   UNFCCC, 2019, GENDER CLIMATE CHANG
   UNFCCC, 2019, CLIM CHANG INCR RISK
   Valodia L, 2009, AGENDA-EMPOWER WOMEN, V23, P137, DOI 10.1080/10130950.2009.9676262
   VANSTEEN JFJ, 1992, J HAZARD MATER, V29, P365, DOI 10.1016/0304-3894(92)85042-Y
   Wan JH, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8101064
   Whyte KP, 2014, HYPATIA, V29, P599, DOI 10.1111/hypa.12089
   World Health Organization, 2014, Gender, climate change and health
NR 72
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 3
U2 8
PU EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
PI BINGLEY
PA HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND
SN 1756-8692
EI 1756-8706
J9 INT J CLIM CHANG STR
JI Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strateg. Manag.
PD FEB 25
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 2
BP 101
EP 124
DI 10.1108/IJCCSM-05-2021-0047
EA FEB 2022
PG 24
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA ZO2SW
UT WOS:000753051000001
OA gold
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Clark, PW
   D'Amato, AW
AF Clark, Peter W.
   D'Amato, Anthony W.
TI Long-term development of transition hardwood and<i> Pinus</i><i>
   strobus</i>-<i> Quercus</i> mixedwood forests with implications for
   future adaptation and mitigation potential
SO FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Functional diversity; Functional identity; Plant traits; Structural
   complexity; Diversity; Temperate forest
ID NORTHEASTERN UNITED-STATES; EUROPEAN VEGETATION CHANGE; STAND-DENSITY
   INDEX; DOUGLAS-FIR FORESTS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY;
   WHITE-PINE; STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT; SUCCESSIONAL GRADIENT; IMPORTANT
   DRIVER
AB Uncertainty about global environmental change has led to increased emphasis on the climate adaptation and mitigation potential of forests. Given the linkages between adaptive capacity and ecosystem complexity, this increased emphasis has motivated evaluations of the compositional, functional, and structural conditions char-acterizing a given forest ecosystem in the context of future stressors; however, less is known about how these conditions develop over time or vary between secondary forests shaped by a history of land use. To address this need, we capitalize on a 69-year field experiment to examine the long-term structural and compositional dy-namics of transition ecotone hardwood (forests containing species from both southern and northern commu-nities) and Pinus strobus-Quercus mixedwood (stands characterized by hardwood and softwood species mixtures) forests, communities which are commonly found in the Northeastern US. As expected, we observed a general increase in biomass over time and increasing density and structural complexity, with live aboveground biomass greatest in structurally complex mixedwood systems dominated by large diameter P. strobus. While all forests trended toward greater shade tolerance with increasing stand age, the functional identities of hardwood stands were stable over time compared to mixedwoods, which were more transient and ultimately generated trait profiles resembling hardwood-dominated stands. Ingrowth on all sites favored shade-tolerant Fagus grandifolia and Tsuga canadensis, which have lower future climate compatibility and adaptability compared to overstory trees, with a noticeable absence of P. strobus and Quercus spp. regeneration. Although all forest types exhibited some conditions that foster adaptation potential, the compositional stability of hardwood-dominated systems highlight the capacity of these stands to maintain comparable levels of adaptive capacity into the future. Conversely, given that P. strobus-Quercus mixedwoods examined are largely an artifact of land use, the natural successional patterns of these forests may lead to a reduction in these mixed species communities and a depreciation of associated climate benefits without silvicultural intervention to favor recruitment of these con-stituent species.
C1 [Clark, Peter W.; D'Amato, Anthony W.] Univ Vermont, Rubenstein Sch Environm & Nat Resources, 81 Carrigan Dr, Burlington, VT 05405 USA.
C3 University of Vermont
RP Clark, PW (corresponding author), Univ Vermont, Rubenstein Sch Environm & Nat Resources, 81 Carrigan Dr, Burlington, VT 05405 USA.
EM peter.clark@uvm.edu
RI D'Amato, Anthony/AAV-3245-2021
FU USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture McIntire-Stennis
   Cooperative Forestry Research Program; Department of Interior Northeast
   Climate Adaptation Science Center
FX Funding for this research was provided by USDA National Institute of
   Food and Agriculture McIntire-Stennis Cooperative Forestry Research
   Program and the Department of Interior Northeast Climate Adaptation
   Science Center. We are grateful for the early investigators at the
   Jericho Research Forest for establishing this long-term experiment, and
   for research technicians Suki Wilder and Jack Goldman who helped
   reestablish this work.
CR Abrams MD, 2001, BIOSCIENCE, V51, P967, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0967:EWPVIT]2.0.CO;2
   [Anonymous], 2014, OTHER TOOLS FUNCTION
   [Anonymous], 1992, ECOLOGY SILVICULTURE, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-8052-6
   Aubin I, 2016, ENVIRON REV, V24, P164, DOI 10.1139/er-2015-0072
   Bates D, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V67, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Boisvert-Marsh L, 2020, FORESTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/f11090989
   Bormann F.H., 1994, Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem. Vol, V1
   Bradford JB, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V308, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.042
   Bradford JB, 2012, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V10, P210, DOI 10.1890/110031
   Bu WS, 2014, TROP ECOL, V55, P393
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Chojnacky DC, 2014, FORESTRY, V87, P129, DOI 10.1093/forestry/cpt053
   Cline A. C., 1942, Harv. For. Bull.
   Cline A.C., 1925, Harvard Forest Bulletin, V8, P74
   Curzon MT, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V400, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.05.056
   D'Amato AW, 2021, CAN J FOREST RES, V51, P172, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2020-0306
   D'Amato AW, 2017, ECOLOGY, V98, P721, DOI 10.1002/ecy.1684
   D'Amato AW, 2011, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V262, P803, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.014
   Dale VH, 2001, BIOSCIENCE, V51, P723, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0723:CCAFD]2.0.CO;2
   Danneyrolles V, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-09265-z
   Domkea GM, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P24649, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2010840117
   Ducey MJ, 2013, FORESTS, V4, P1055, DOI 10.3390/f4041055
   Duveneck MJ, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V55, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.009
   Eisen K, 2015, J TORREY BOT SOC, V142, P97, DOI 10.3159/TORREY-D-14-00027.1
   Elmqvist T, 2003, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V1, P488, DOI 10.2307/3868116
   Evans AM, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V96, P167, DOI 10.1007/s10584-009-9569-3
   Fahey TJ, 2013, J TORREY BOT SOC, V140, P52, DOI 10.3159/TORREY-D-12-00024.1
   Fahey TJ, 2010, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V8, P245, DOI 10.1890/080169
   Finzi AC, 2020, ECOL MONOGR, V90, DOI 10.1002/ecm.1423
   Fisher R.T., 1920, Journal of Forestry, V18, P358
   Foley JA, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P570, DOI 10.1126/science.1111772
   Forrer K., 2005, Integrating Sustainability into Forest Management Planning of the University of Vermonts Jericho Research Forest, Jericho, VT
   Foster D.R., 1995, Global Land Use Change: Perspective from the Columbian Encounter
   FOSTER DR, 1988, J ECOL, V76, P105, DOI 10.2307/2260457
   Foster JR, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P4497, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13046
   Franklin J.F., 2018, ECOLOGICAL FOREST MA
   Franklin JF, 2002, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V155, P399, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00575-8
   Frelich Lee, 2016, F1000Res, V5, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.7412.1
   Gini C., 1921, The Economic Journal, V31, P124
   Gunderson LanceH., 2010, FDN ECOLOGICAL RESIL
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Hall B., 2021, FOREST TYPE MAPS NEW, DOI [10.6073/pasta/6994b9f12c61619df377a14b455b04d7, DOI 10.6073/PASTA/6994B9F12C61619DF377A14B455B04D7]
   Hanlon VCT, 2019, EVOL LETT, V3, P348, DOI 10.1002/evl3.121
   HARMON ME, 1986, ADV ECOL RES, V15, P133, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60121-X
   Helms J.A., 1998, The Dictionary of Forestry
   HIBBS DE, 1982, CAN J BOT, V60, P2046, DOI 10.1139/b82-252
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hoover C, 2007, J FOREST, V105, P266
   Iverson LR, 2008, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V254, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.023
   Iverson LR, 2011, ECOSYSTEMS, V14, P1005, DOI 10.1007/s10021-011-9456-4
   Johnstone JF, 2016, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V14, P369, DOI 10.1002/fee.1311
   Joyce LA, 2009, ENVIRON MANAGE, V44, P1022, DOI 10.1007/s00267-009-9324-6
   Jucker T, 2015, FUNCT ECOL, V29, P1078, DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12428
   Kabrick JM, 2017, J FOREST, V115, P190, DOI 10.5849/jof.2016-024
   Kelty M.J., 1996, Silviculture of Temperate and Boreal Broadleaf Mixtures, P47
   Kenefic LS, 2021, CAN J FOREST RES, V51, P921, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2020-0410
   Kern CC, 2021, CAN J FOREST RES, V51, P897, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2020-0492
   Kuznetsova A, 2017, J STAT SOFTW, V82, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Laliberté E, 2010, ECOLOGY, V91, P299, DOI 10.1890/08-2244.1
   Lavorel S, 2002, FUNCT ECOL, V16, P545, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x
   Lavorel S, 2008, FUNCT ECOL, V22, P134, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01339.x
   Leak W.B., 1987, NE336
   Long J. N., 1985, FOREST CHRON, P5
   Lovett GM, 2016, ECOL APPL, V26, P1437, DOI 10.1890/15-1176
   Lutz JA, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0036131
   Malmsheimer RW, 2008, J FOREST, V106, P115
   Matthews SN, 2011, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V262, P1460, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.047
   McElhinny C, 2005, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V218, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.034
   Messier C, 2019, FOR ECOSYST, V6, DOI 10.1186/s40663-019-0166-2
   Michel AK, 2009, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V257, P1453, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.11.027
   Millar CI, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P2145, DOI 10.1890/06-1715.1
   Nagel LM, 2017, J FOREST, V115, P167, DOI 10.5849/jof.16-039
   Nevins MT, 2021, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V479, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118527
   Nowacki GJ, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P314, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12663
   Oksanen Jari, 2022, CRAN
   OLIVER CD, 1977, ECOLOGY, V58, P562, DOI 10.2307/1939005
   Oliver CD., 1996, Forest Stand Dynamics, P41
   Orwig DA, 1998, J TORREY BOT SOC, V125, P60, DOI 10.2307/2997232
   Pachauri RK, 2014, 2014 IEEE STUDENTS' CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE (SCEECS)
   Palik B.J., 2020, ECOLOGICAL SILVICULT
   Paquette A, 2011, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V20, P170, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00592.x
   Park A, 2014, CRIT REV PLANT SCI, V33, P251, DOI 10.1080/07352689.2014.858956
   Pederson N, 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V21, P2105, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12779
   Peters M. P., 2020, CLIMATE CHANGE TREE
   Plotkin AB, 2013, ECOLOGY, V94, P414, DOI 10.1890/12-0487.1
   Pournelle G. H., 1953, Journal of Mammalogy, V34, P133
   Pregitzer KS, 2004, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V10, P2052, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00866.x
   Puettmann K.J., 2009, CRITIQUE SILVICULTUR
   Reineke LH, 1933, J AGRIC RES, V46, P0627
   Santoro JA, 2019, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V444, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.04.039
   Seymour R.S., 2011, Influence of Age on Productivity and Carbon Sequestration of Eastern White Pine, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-28372-8_12
   SHIGO AL, 1972, J FOREST, V70, P286
   Speer J.H., 2011, FUNDAMENTALS TREE RI
   Staudhammer CL, 2001, CAN J FOREST RES, V31, P1105, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-31-7-1105
   Suding KN, 2008, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V14, P1125, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01557.x
   Thompson E., 2019, Wetland, Woodland, Wildland: A Guide to the Natural Communities of Vermont, V2nd
   Thompson JR, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0072540
   Toumey J.W., 1928, Foundations of Silviculture Upon an Ecological Basis, Volume, V1, DOI DOI 10.2307/2255901
   Turner T. L., 1988, DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLA
   Urbano AR, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V392, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.02.037
   Vicente-Silva J, 2016, NAT CONSERVACAO, V14, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.ncon.2016.09.006
   Villéger S, 2008, ECOLOGY, V89, P2290, DOI 10.1890/07-1206.1
   Violle C, 2007, OIKOS, V116, P882, DOI 10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.15559.x
   Waskiewicz J, 2013, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V298, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.02.027
   Waterman JM, 2020, J TORREY BOT SOC, V147, P291, DOI 10.3159/TORREY-D-18-00033.1
   Webster CR, 2018, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V421, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.01.010
   WEINER J, 1984, OECOLOGIA, V61, P334, DOI 10.1007/BF00379630
   WESTVELD MARINUS, 1956, JOUR FOREST, V54, P332
   Wharton E. H., 1984, NE322 USFS GTR
   Woodall CW, 2005, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V216, P367, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.050
   Wyka SA, 2017, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V23, P394, DOI 10.1111/gcb.13359
NR 111
TC 4
Z9 5
U1 1
U2 15
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0378-1127
EI 1872-7042
J9 FOREST ECOL MANAG
JI For. Ecol. Manage.
PD DEC 1
PY 2021
VL 501
AR 119654
DI 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119654
EA SEP 2021
PG 12
WC Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Forestry
GA UZ0LB
UT WOS:000701903300001
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Slavov, GT
   Davey, CL
   Bosch, M
   Robson, PRH
   Donnison, IS
   Mackay, IJ
AF Slavov, Gancho T.
   Davey, Christopher L.
   Bosch, Maurice
   Robson, Paul R. H.
   Donnison, Iain S.
   Mackay, Ian J.
TI Genomic index selection provides a pragmatic framework for setting and
   refining multi-objective breeding targets in <i>Miscanthus</i>
SO ANNALS OF BOTANY
LA English
DT Article
DE Selection indices; genomic selection; breeding objectives; economic
   values; correlated responses; Miscanthus sinensis
ID COLD TOLERANCE; ENERGY CROPS; BIOMASS; PREDICTION; TRAITS; ASSOCIATION;
   YIELD; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; DISCOVERY; PHENOLOGY
AB Background Miscanthus has potential as a biomass crop but the development of varieties that are consistently superior to the natural hybrid M. x giganteus has been challenging, presumably because of strong G x E interactions and poor knowledge of the complex genetic architectures of traits underlying biomass productivity and climatic adaptation. While linkage and association mapping studies are starting to generate long lists of candidate regions and even individual genes, it seems unlikely that this information can be translated into effective marker-assisted selection for the needs of breeding programmes. Genomic selection has emerged as a viable alternative, and prediction accuracies are moderate across a range of phenological and morphometric traits in Miscanthus, though relatively low for biomass yield per se.
   Methods We have previously proposed a combination of index selection and genomic prediction as a way of overcoming the limitations imposed by the inherent complexity of biomass yield. Here we extend this approach and illustrate its potential to achieve multiple breeding targets simultaneously in the absence of a priori knowledge about their relative economic importance, while also monitoring correlated selection responses for non-target traits. We evaluate two hypothetical scenarios of increasing biomass yield by 20 % within a single round of selection. In the first scenario, this is achieved in combination with delaying flowering by 44 d (roughly 20 %), whereas, in the second, increased yield is targeted jointly with reduced lignin (-5 %) and increased cellulose (+5 %) content, relative to current average levels in the breeding population.
   Key Results In both scenarios, the objectives were achieved efficiently (selection intensities corresponding to keeping the best 20 and 4 % of genotypes, respectively). However, the outcomes were strikingly different in terms of correlated responses, and the relative economic values (i.e. value per unit of change in each trait compared with that for biomass yield) of secondary traits included in selection indices varied considerably.
   Conclusions Although these calculations rely on multiple assumptions, they highlight the need to evaluate breeding objectives and explicitly consider correlated responses in silico, prior to committing extensive resources. The proposed approach is broadly applicable for this purpose and can readily incorporate high-throughput phenotyping data as part of integrated breeding platforms.
C1 [Slavov, Gancho T.] Rothamsted Res, Computat & Analyt Sci Dept, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, Herts, England.
   [Davey, Christopher L.; Bosch, Maurice; Robson, Paul R. H.; Donnison, Iain S.] Aberystwyth Univ, Inst Biol Environm & Rural Sci, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, Dyfed, Wales.
   [Mackay, Ian J.] IMPlant Consultancy Ltd, Chelmsford CM2 6HA, Essex, England.
C3 UK Research & Innovation (UKRI); Biotechnology and Biological Sciences
   Research Council (BBSRC); Rothamsted Research; Aberystwyth University;
   UK Research & Innovation (UKRI); Biotechnology and Biological Sciences
   Research Council (BBSRC); Institute of Biological, Environmental, Rural
   & Sciences (IBERS)
RP Slavov, GT (corresponding author), Rothamsted Res, Computat & Analyt Sci Dept, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, Herts, England.
EM gancho.slavov@rothamsted.ac.uk
RI Bosch, Maurice/C-6400-2008; Donnison, Iain/K-6138-2014
OI Donnison, Iain/0000-0001-6276-555X; Robson, Paul/0000-0003-1841-3594;
   Bosch, Maurice/0000-0003-1990-589X
FU UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K01711X/1,
   BBS/E/W/10963A01A, BB/CSP1730/1]; BBSRC [BBS/E/W/10963A01A,
   BB/K01711X/1, BBS/E/W/0012843A, BBS/E/C/000I0410, BBS/E/W/10963A01B,
   BBS/E/W/10963A01E] Funding Source: UKRI
FX This work was supported by the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences
   Research Council (grant nos BB/K01711X/1, BBS/E/W/10963A01A and
   BB/CSP1730/1).
CR Akdemir D, 2017, BIORXIV, DOI [10.1101/209080, DOI 10.1101/209080]
   Allison DB, 2002, AM J HUM GENET, V70, P575, DOI 10.1086/339273
   [Anonymous], 1998, MOL DISSECTION COMPL
   Bentley AR, 2014, THEOR APPL GENET, V127, P2619, DOI 10.1007/s00122-014-2403-y
   Bernardo R, 2016, THEOR APPL GENET, V129, P2323, DOI 10.1007/s00122-016-2772-5
   Bhatia R, 2017, PLANT BIOTECHNOL J, V15, P1071, DOI 10.1111/pbi.12764
   Boyle EA, 2017, CELL, V169, P1177, DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.038
   Buckler ES, 2009, SCIENCE, V325, P714, DOI 10.1126/science.1174276
   Button KS, 2013, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V14, P365, DOI 10.1038/nrn3475
   Chung JiHoon Chung JiHoon, 2012, Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, V15, P65
   Clark LV, 2016, ANN BOT-LONDON, V118, P941, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcw137
   Clifton-Brown JC, 2000, ANN BOT-LONDON, V86, P191, DOI 10.1006/anbo.2000.1183
   Clifton-Brown J, 2017, GCB BIOENERGY, V9, P6, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12357
   Clifton-Brown John, 2008, P273, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-70805-8_10
   Cockram J, 2018, ADV BIOCHEM ENG BIOT, V164, P109, DOI 10.1007/10_2017_48
   Cuevas J, 2017, G3-GENES GENOM GENET, V7, P41, DOI 10.1534/g3.116.035584
   da Costa RMF, 2019, ANN BOT-LONDON, V124, P553, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcy155
   da Costa RMF, 2017, NEW PHYTOL, V213, P1710, DOI 10.1111/nph.14306
   Costa RMF, 2014, ANN BOT-LONDON, V114, P1265, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcu054
   Davey CL, 2017, J EXP BOT, V68, P5093, DOI 10.1093/jxb/erx339
   Davey JW, 2011, NAT REV GENET, V12, P499, DOI 10.1038/nrg3012
   Dong HX, 2018, GCB BIOENERGY, V10, P165, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12472
   Evans LM, 2014, NAT GENET, V46, P1089, DOI 10.1038/ng.3075
   Falconer D. S., 1989, Introduction to quantitative genetics.
   Farrell AD, 2006, ANN APPL BIOL, V149, P337, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2006.00099.x
   Fonteyne S, 2018, ANN BOT-LONDON, V121, P281, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcx159
   Furtado A, 2014, PLANT BIOTECHNOL J, V12, P1246, DOI 10.1111/pbi.12300
   Garrick DJ, 2009, GENET SEL EVOL, V41, DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-41-55
   Gaynor RC, 2017, CROP SCI, V57, P2372, DOI 10.2135/cropsci2016.09.0742
   Gifford JM, 2015, GCB BIOENERGY, V7, P797, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12201
   Hallingbäck HR, 2016, GCB BIOENERGY, V8, P670, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12280
   Hastings A, 2009, GCB BIOENERGY, V1, P180, DOI 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2009.01012.x
   Heaton E, 2004, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V27, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.10.005
   Ings J, 2013, FRONT PLANT SCI, V4, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2013.00468
   Jensen E, 2011, GCB BIOENERGY, V3, P387, DOI 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01097.x
   Jia Y, 2012, GENETICS, V192, P1513, DOI 10.1534/genetics.112.144246
   Lewandowski I, 2000, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V19, P209, DOI 10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00032-5
   Li X, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0180217
   Liu W, 2012, GCB BIOENERGY, V4, P545, DOI 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01157.x
   Long SP, 2013, ANNU REV PLANT BIOL, V64, P701, DOI 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120033
   Mackay I, 2015, FOOD ENERGY SECUR, V4, P25, DOI 10.1002/fes3.52
   Malinowska M, 2017, GCB BIOENERGY, V9, P78, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12350
   Meuwissen THE, 2001, GENETICS, V157, P1819
   Naidu SL, 2003, PLANT PHYSIOL, V132, P1688, DOI 10.1104/pp.103.021790
   Richter GM, 2008, SOIL USE MANAGE, V24, P235, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2008.00156.x
   Sacks EJ., 2013, Genomics of the Saccharinae, P73, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-5947-84, 10.1007/978-1-4419-5947-8, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-5947-8_4]
   Slavov G, 2013, GCB BIOENERGY, V5, P562, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12025
   Slavov G, 2013, FRONT PLANT SCI, V4, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2013.00217
   Slavov GT, 2014, NEW PHYTOL, V201, P1227, DOI 10.1111/nph.12621
   Smith HF, 1936, ANN EUGENIC, V7, P240, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02143.x
   Stavridou E, 2019, ANN BOT-LONDON, V124, P653, DOI 10.1093/aob/mcz009
   Stavridou E, 2017, GCB BIOENERGY, V9, P92, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12351
   Tanger P, 2013, FRONT PLANT SCI, V4, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2013.00218
   Valentine J, 2012, GCB BIOENERGY, V4, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01111.x
   Van der Weijde T, 2017, GCB BIOENERGY, V9, P176, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12355
   Van der Weijde T, 2017, GCB BIOENERGY, V9, P770, DOI 10.1111/gcbb.12382
   Visscher PM, 2017, AM J HUM GENET, V101, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.005
   Welker CM, 2015, ENERGIES, V8, P7654, DOI 10.3390/en8087654
   WENG JH, 1993, PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V29, P43
   Witzel CP, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V53, P681, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.063
   YAMADA Y, 1975, JPN J GENET, V50, P33, DOI 10.1266/jjg.50.33
   Zeng YN, 2014, CURR OPIN BIOTECH, V27, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.09.008
NR 62
TC 10
Z9 11
U1 1
U2 10
PU OXFORD UNIV PRESS
PI OXFORD
PA GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND
SN 0305-7364
EI 1095-8290
J9 ANN BOT-LONDON
JI Ann. Bot.
PD SEP 13
PY 2019
VL 124
IS 4
SI SI
BP 521
EP 529
DI 10.1093/aob/mcy187
PG 9
WC Plant Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Plant Sciences
GA JX6ZS
UT WOS:000503881100002
PM 30351424
OA hybrid, Green Published, Green Submitted
DA 2025-01-10
ER

PT J
AU Chu, JH
   Lin, RC
   Yeh, CF
   Hsu, YC
   Li, SH
AF Chu, Jui-Hua
   Lin, Rong-Chien
   Yeh, Chia-Fen
   Hsu, Yu-Cheng
   Li, Shou-Hsien
TI Characterization of the transcriptome of an ecologically important avian
   species, the Vinous-throated <i>Parrotbill Paradoxornis webbianus
   bulomachus</i> (Paradoxornithidae; Aves)
SO BMC GENOMICS
LA English
DT Article
ID FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; SEQUENCING DATA; HIGH-ALTITUDE; RNA-SEQ;
   ADAPTATION; SPECIATION; TOOL; POPULATIONS; ANNOTATION; TIMALIIDAE
AB Background: Adaptive divergence driven by environmental heterogeneity has long been a fascinating topic in ecology and evolutionary biology. The study of the genetic basis of adaptive divergence has, however, been greatly hampered by a lack of genomic information. The recent development of transcriptome sequencing provides an unprecedented opportunity to generate large amounts of genomic data for detailed investigations of the genetics of adaptive divergence in non-model organisms. Herein, we used the Illumina sequencing platform to sequence the transcriptome of brain and liver tissues from a single individual of the Vinous-throated Parrotbill, Paradoxornis webbianus bulomachus, an ecologically important avian species in Taiwan with a wide elevational range of sea level to 3100 m.
   Results: Our 10.1 Gbp of sequences were first assembled based on Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata) and chicken (Gallus gallus) RNA references. The remaining reads were then de novo assembled. After filtering out contigs with low coverage (<10X), we retained 67,791 of 487,336 contigs, which covered approximately 5.3% of the P. w. bulomachus genome. Of 7,779 contigs retained for a top-hit species distribution analysis, the majority (about 86%) were matched to known Zebra Finch and chicken transcripts. We also annotated 6,365 contigs to gene ontology (GO) terms: in total, 122 GO-slim terms were assigned, including biological process (41%), molecular function (32%), and cellular component (27%). Many potential genetic markers for future adaptive genomic studies were also identified: 8,589 single nucleotide polymorphisms, 1,344 simple sequence repeats and 109 candidate genes that might be involved in elevational or climate adaptation.
   Conclusions: Our study shows that transcriptome data can serve as a rich genetic resource, even for a single run of short-read sequencing from a single individual of a non-model species. This is the first study providing transcriptomic information for species in the avian superfamily Sylvioidea, which comprises more than 1,000 species. Our data can be used to study adaptive divergence in heterogeneous environments and investigate other important ecological and evolutionary questions in parrotbills from different populations and even in other species in the Sylvioidea.
C1 [Chu, Jui-Hua; Lin, Rong-Chien; Yeh, Chia-Fen; Li, Shou-Hsien] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Dept Life Sci, Taipei 116, Taiwan.
   [Hsu, Yu-Cheng] Natl Dong Hwa Univ, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Studies, Hualien 97401, Taiwan.
C3 National Taiwan Normal University; National Dong Hwa University
RP Li, SH (corresponding author), Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Dept Life Sci, Taipei 116, Taiwan.
EM t43028@ntnu.edu.tw
RI Lin, Rong-Chien/LIC-2433-2024
FU National Science Council (NSC) of Taiwan; NSC
FX We are grateful to Alan Watson who greatly improved the readability of
   this manuscript. The study was supported by a grant from the National
   Science Council (NSC) of Taiwan to SHL. JHC is a post-doctoral
   researcher funded by a grant from the NSC.
CR Alström P, 2006, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V38, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.05.015
   Ashburner M, 2000, NAT GENET, V25, P25, DOI 10.1038/75556
   Cibois A, 2003, AUK, V120, P35, DOI 10.1642/0004-8038(2003)120[0035:MDPOBT]2.0.CO;2
   Conesa A, 2005, BIOINFORMATICS, V21, P3674, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610
   Ellegren H, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P283, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2009.12.004
   Faircloth BC, 2008, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V8, P92, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01884.x
   Garant D, 2005, MOL ECOL, V14, P1843, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02561.x
   Gotz S, 2008, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V36, P3420, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkn176
   Hachisuka M., 1951, Quarterly Journal of the Taiwan Museum, V4
   Hancock AM, 2008, PLOS GENET, V4, DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.0040032
   Hudson ME, 2008, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V8, P3, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.02019.x
   ISLAM SA, 1995, PROTEIN ENG, V8, P513, DOI 10.1093/protein/8.6.513
   Körner C, 2007, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V22, P569, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.006
   Li H, 2009, BIOINFORMATICS, V25, P1754, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
   Losos JB, 2010, AM NAT, V175, P623, DOI 10.1086/652433
   McKenna A, 2010, GENOME RES, V20, P1297, DOI 10.1101/gr.107524.110
   Metzker ML, 2010, NAT REV GENET, V11, P31, DOI 10.1038/nrg2626
   Morozova O, 2008, GENOMICS, V92, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.07.001
   Ozsolak F, 2011, NAT REV GENET, V12, P87, DOI 10.1038/nrg2934
   Paszkiewicz K, 2010, BRIEF BIOINFORM, V11, P457, DOI 10.1093/bib/bbq020
   Penhallurick J, 2009, FORKTAIL, P137
   Renaut S, 2010, MOL ECOL, V19, P115, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04477.x
   Rice AM, 2011, ECOL LETT, V14, P9, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01546.x
   Robertson G, 2010, NAT METHODS, V7, P909, DOI 10.1038/nmeth.1517
   Robson C, 2007, HDB BIRDS WORLD
   Rundle HD, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P336, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00715.x
   Schluter D, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P9955, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0901264106
   Seeb JE, 2011, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V11, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02979.x
   Seeb JE, 2011, MOL ECOL RESOUR, V11, P335, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02936.x
   Simonson TS, 2010, SCIENCE, V329, P72, DOI 10.1126/science.1189406
   Smith CT, 2005, MOL ECOL, V14, P4193, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02731.x
   Surget-Groba Y, 2010, GENOME RES, V20, P1432, DOI 10.1101/gr.103846.109
   Turner TL, 2010, NAT GENET, V42, P260, DOI 10.1038/ng.515
   Wang Z, 2009, NAT REV GENET, V10, P57, DOI 10.1038/nrg2484
   Warren WC, 2010, NATURE, V464, P757, DOI 10.1038/nature08819
   Wheelan SJ, 2000, BIOINFORMATICS, V16, P613, DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.7.613
   White BJ, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P244, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1013648108
   Yi X, 2010, SCIENCE, V329, P75, DOI 10.1126/science.1190371
NR 38
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 1
U2 25
PU BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
PI LONDON
PA 236 GRAYS INN RD, FLOOR 6, LONDON WC1X 8HL, ENGLAND
SN 1471-2164
J9 BMC GENOMICS
JI BMC Genomics
PD APR 24
PY 2012
VL 13
AR 149
DI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-149
PG 11
WC Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Genetics & Heredity
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Genetics & Heredity
GA 100WN
UT WOS:000315735600001
PM 22530590
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-01-10
ER

EF