I’m testing 2 formats of input file with the same data downloaded from Scopus: robust csv and ris scopus.
In order to transform original csv from Scopus into robust csv I’ve separated fields that are hosting multiple items with 3 successive stars.
So as the data has no difference, I hope to get the same maps created by 2 tested formats in Network Mapping script. Although there is some difference in auteurs’ homogeneous network depending on type of format (position of nodes and distance between them are not the same).
Besides, some columns from robust csv are not parsed into cortext db (“Art. No.”, “References”, “Year”).
Could you please check the absence of several columns and difference in maps?
Link for the project is below: https://managerv2.cortext.net/project/89690002702
test of robust csv and ris scopus
I have run two Network Mapping analysis for Author-Author with raw as a proximity measure and no edge filter (Find the Optimal Proximity Threshold as No)
I hope it helps!